Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0067 TANBARK ROAD
�o '7 �� �� ,. t �.��..,�., - - _ � , . . ��,.� -----j C46Y.1J. G�S�vt �do,•✓1 l rCie )ryLj C� in( si 1p i t r jv'vG� aS i cVo"i ( e�5„ �i I� r Town of Barnstable ��a5�.7 �0.*'IHE TOiy� Expires 6 ng the on a date Regulatory Services Fee v MASS.' Thomas F. Geiler,Director �A 039. rED MA'1 Building Division Tom Perry, CBO, Building Commissioner 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 www.town.bamstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 EXPRESS PERMIT APPLICATION - RESIDENTIAL ONLY Not Valid.without Red X-Press Imprint Map/parcel Number Property Address fiW-MA d 19111,f [Residential Value of Work Uy- Minimum fee of$25.00 for work under$6000.00 Owner's Name&Address ///�Lc�� � Tom- �� � ono&( Contractor's Name Telephone Number Home Improvement Contractor License#(if applicable) Construction Supervisor's License#(if applicable) ❑Workman's Compensation Insurance ® DES PERMIT Check one: NOV -- 9 2009 ❑ I am a sole proprietor P!am the Homeowner 'TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ❑ I have Worker's Compensation Insurance Insurance Company Name Workman's Comp.Policy# Copy of Insurance Compliance Certificate must accompany each permit. Permit Request(check box) n H Re-roof(stripping old shingles) All construction debris.will be taken to i(1�c,/l %/��� ❑Re-roof(not stripping. Going over existing layers of roof) ❑ Re-side , #of doors ❑ Replacement Windows/doors/sliders.U-Value (maximum .44)#of windows *Where required: Issuance of this permit does not exempt compliance with other town department regulations,i.e.Historic,Conservation,etc. ***Note: Property Owner must sign Property Owner Letter of Permission. . A copy of the Home Improvement Contractors License&Construction Supervisors License is required. SIGNATURE: Q:\WPFILESTORMS\building pemut forms\EXP S.doc Revised 090809 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents Office of Investigations h L 600 Washington Street c , : Boston, MA 02111 www.mass.gov/dia Workers' Compensation Insurance Affidavit: Builders/Contractors/Electricians/Plumbers Applicant Information Please Print Le il7•bly Name (Business/Organi2ation/Individual): Address: City/State/Zip: ma 2 a�/ Phone #' GX09 � Are you an employer? Check the appropriate box: Type of project(required): 1.❑ I am a employer with 4. ❑ I am a general contractor and I 6 ❑New construction have hired the sub-contractors employees (full and/or part-time).* listed on the attached sheet. 7. ❑ Remodeling 2.El I am a sole proprietor or partner- These sub-contractors have g. ❑ Demolition ship and have no employees working for me in any capacity. employees and have workers' 9 ❑ Building addition [No workers' comp. insurance comp. insurance.l �, re uired.] 5. ❑ We are a corporation and its 10.❑ Electrical repairs or additions 3.y2'1 am a homeowner doing all work officers have exercised their I LE] Plumbing repairs or additions myself. [No workers' comp. right of exemption per MGL 12.❑ Roof repairs insurance d.re uire t C. 152, §1(4),and we have no required.] employees. [No workers' 13.❑ Other comp..insurance required.] "Any applicant that checks box#1 must also fill out the section below showing their workers'compensation policy information. t Homeowners who submit this affidavit indicating they are doing all work and then hire outside contractors must submit a new affidavit indicating such. tContractors that check this box must attached an additional sheet showing the name of the sub-contractors and state whether or not those entities have employees. If the sub-contractors have employees,they must provide their workers'comp.policy number. I am an employer that is providing workers'compensation insurance for my employees. Below is the policy and job site information. Insurance Company Name: Policy# or Self-ins.Lic.#: Expiration Date: Job Site Address: City/State/Zip: Attach a copy of the workers' compensation policy declaration page (showing the policy number and expiration date). Failure to secure coverage as required under Section 25A of MGL c. 152 can lead to the imposition of criminal penalties of a fine up to$1,500.00 and/or one-year imprisonment, as well as civil penalties in the form of a STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of up to$250.00 a day against the violator. Be advised that a copy of this statement.may be forwarded to the Office of Investigations of the DIA for insurance coverage verification. I do hereby certify under the pain/s/and penalties of perjcrry that the information provided above is trice and correct. Signature: !✓ Date: Phone#: Official ctse only. Do not write in this area, to be completed by city or town official. City or Town: Permit/License# j Issuing Authority (circle one): 1. Board of Health 2. Building Department 3. City/Town Clerk 4. Electrical Inspector 5. Plumbing Inspector 6. Other Contact Person: Phone•#: Information and Instructions Massachusetts General Laws chapter 152 requires all employers to provide workers' compensation for their employees. Pursuant to this statute, an enrplo},ee is defined as "...every person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written." An employer is defined as "an individual,partnership, association, corporation or other legal entity, or any two or more of the foregoing engaged in a joint enterprise, and including the legal representatives of a deceased employer, or the receiver.or trustee of an individual, partnership, association or other legal entity, employing employees. However the owner of a dwelling house having not more than three apartments and who resides therein, or the occupant of the dwelling house of another who employs persons to do maintenance, construction or repair work on'Such dwelling house or on the grounds or building appurtenant thereto shall not because of such employment be deemed to be an employer." MGL chapter 152, §25C(6)also states that"every state or local licensing agency shall withhold the issuance or renewal of a license or permit to operate a business or to construct buildings in the commonwealth for any applicant who has not produced acceptable evidence of compliance with the insurance coverage required." Additionally,MGL chapter 152, §25C(7)states"Neither the commonwealth nor any of its political subdivisions shall enter into any contract for the performance of public work until acceptable evidence of compliance with the insurance requirements of this chapter have been presented to the contracting authority." Applicants Please fill out the workers' compensation affidavit completely,by checking the boxes that apply to your situation and, if necessary,supply sub-contractor(s)name(s), address(es)and phone number(s)along with their certificate(s)of insurance. Limited Liability Companies (LLC)or Limited Liability Partnerships(LLP)with no employees other than the members or partners, are not required to carry workers' compensation insurance. If an LLC or LLP does have employees,a policy is required. Be advised that this affidavit may be submitted to the Department of Industrial Accidents for confirmation of insurance coverage. Also be sure to sign and date the affidavit. The affidavit should be returned to the city or town that the application for the permit or license is being requested,not the Department of Industrial Accidents. Should you have any questions regarding the law or, if you are required to obtain a workers' compensation policy,please call the Department at the number listed below. Self-insured companies should enter their self-insurance license number on the appropriate line. City or Town Officials Please be sure that the affidavit is complete and printed legibly. The Department has provided a space at the bottom of the affidavit for you to fill out in the event the Office of Investigations has to contact you regarding the applicant. Please be sure to fill in the permit/license number which will be used as a.reference number. In addition, an applicant that must submit multiple permit/license applications in any given year, need only submit one affidavit indicating current policy information (if necessary)and under"Job Site Address" the.applicant should write"all locations in (city or town)."A copy of the affidavit that has been officially stamped or marked by the city or town may be provided to the applicant as proof that a valid affidavit is on file for future permits or licenses. A new affidavit must be filled out each year. Where a home owner or citizen is obtaining a license or permit not related to any business or commercial venture (i.e. a dog license or permit to bum leaves etc.)said person is NOT required to complete this affidavit. The Office of Investigations would like to thank you in advance for your cooperation and should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call. The Department's address, telephone and fax number: The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents Office of Investigations 600 Washington Street Boston, MA 02111 Tel. # 617-727-4900 ext 406 or 1-877-MASSAFE Revised 4-24-07 Fax # 617-727-7749 www.mass.gov/dia i , Town of Barnstable ofzl+r Regulatory Services o� RA"SrABLE Thomas F.Geiler,Director MASS. 039. ��� Building ]division pTfD pAA'1> - Tom Perry,Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790--6230 HOMEOWNER LICENSE EXEMPTION A Please Print DATE: /I / JOB LOCATION: t 7:2 iT( ic� �l���O/��5��/0- number street village "HOMEOWNER": name ,��y�, home phone# work phone# CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS: pS � city/town state zip code The current exemption for"homeowners"was extended to include owner-occupied dwellings of six units or less and to allow homeowners to engage an individual for hire who does not possess a license,provided that the owner acts as Supervisor. DEFINITION OF HOMEOWNER Person(s)who owns a parcel of land on which he/she resides or intends to reside,on which there is,or is intended to be,a one or two-family dwelling,attached or detached structures accessory to such use and/or farm structures. A person who constructs more than one home in a two-year period shall riot be considered a homeowner. Such "homeowner"shall submit to the Building Official on a form acceptable to the Building Official, that he/she shall be responsible for all such work performed under the building permit. (Section 109.1.1) The undersigned"homeowner"assumes responsibility for compliance with the State Building Code and other applicable codes,bylaws,rules and regulations. The undersigned"homeowner"certifies that he/she understands the Town of Barnstable Building Department minimum inspection procedures and requirements and that be/she will comply with said procedures and requirements. Signature of Homeowner Approval of Building Official Note: Three-family dwellings containing 35,000 cubic feet or larger will be required to comply with the State Building Code Section 127.0 Construction Control. HOMEOWNER'S EXEMPTION The Code states that: "Any homeowner performing work for which a building permit is required shall be exempt from the provisions of this section(Section 109.1.1 -Licensing of construction Supervisors);provided that if the homeowner engages a person(s)for hire to do such work,that such Homeowner shall act as supervisor." Many homeowners who use this exemption are unaware that they are assuming the responsibilities of a supervisor(see Appendix Q, Rules&Regulations for Licensing Construction Supervisors,Section 2.15) This lack of awareness often results in serious problems,particularly when the homeowner hires unlicensed persons. In this case,our Board cannot proceed against the unlicensed person as it would with a licensed Supervisor. The homeowner acting as Supervisor is ultimately responsible. To ensure that the homeowner is fully aware of his/her responsibilities,many communities require,as part of the permit application, that the homeowner certify that he/she understands the responsibilities of a Supervisor. On the last page of this issue is a form currently used by several towns. You may care t amend and adopt such a form/certification for use in your community. QAWPFILES\FORM S\homeexempLDOC J , ��HEr°w Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services BAMSTABLE. ' Thomas F. Geiler,Director ncnss.9�p1 i639 g ,�0. Building Division Eo�, Tom Perry,Building Commissioner .200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 www.town.b arnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 Property Owner Must Complete and Sign This Section If Using A Builder I , as Owner of the subject property hereby authorize to act on my behalf, in all matters relative to work authorized by this building permit application for. (Address of Job) Signature of Owner Date Print Name If Pr_ ope_dy Owner is applying for permit please complete the Homeowners License Exemption Form on the reverse side. g�.q,"Sy�±l_{ y Iii. y _ ..'T '771 �'(�IKw'�1�PJ� '•/ fR'4'k �'Pk$'' � 1� � % TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Permit No. ..327,25.. BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OFFICE BUILDING Cash N�...'. 8Q HYANNIS.MASS.02601 Bond CERTIFICATE OF USE AND OCCUPANCY F Issued to Greenbrier Corp, Address Lot #113, 67 Tanbark Road. r Marstons Mills, Mass. S USE GROUP FIRE GRADING OCCUPANCY LOAD THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BE VALID, AND THE BUILDING SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL SIGNED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR UPON SATISFACTORY COMPLIANCE WITH TOWN REQUIREMENTS AND.IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 119.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE. May 25, 89 /tz� ........................... 19................. ........... .......... Building In pector TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS B ul WING P��i �T A=100-31 DATE i r c 2 11 19 lul 9 PERMIT NO. lk-K) 32725� APPLICANT owlic r ADDRESS_L_i.,.,;t,--:�d 6,:'law #001397 (NO.) (STREET) —(CONTR'S LICENSE) +. tPERMIT TO iAll i fl I Fajni:L�.,. DWC Tp STORY - N- UMBER OF UNITS (TYPE OF IMPROVEMEN NO. (PROPOSED US-E) 19WELLING U AT (LOCATION) _Lot 4113, 67 lanhcu-k Road , ZONING ICT— RF (NO.) (STREETI DISTR BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) SUBDIVISION LOT LOT—BLOCK SIZE BUILDING IS TO BE FT, WIDE By FT. LONG BY _ IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION- TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS: Sewage TT 89-.8 AREA OR c. . N/A VOLUME 768 s -L: FEE t ESTIMATED Co $ 45 , 000 00 PERMIT I ST 6 1...5 0 (CUBIC/SOUARE FEET) — OWNER Gre-clibrit;r C.,_-!rp. BUILDING DEPT.ADDRESS p• 0 0, I L 1 BY O'R'Kl—'r-F'rE-rS*SU-4-FIM-t--at`rpi, eR 6 T`0` OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF THREE CALL APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR JOB AND THIS WHERE APPLICABLE SEPARATE ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: CARD KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN PERMITS ARE REQUIRED RED FO'R I. ELECTRICAL, PLUMNG FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS. MADE. WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS RE- MECHANICAL I NSTALLB IATIONS.AND 2. PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL QUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL MEMBERS(READY TO LATH). 3. FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. OCCUPANCY. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM STREET BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS OD 2 ere�.E) HEATING INSPECTION APPROVALS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OTHER BOARD OF HEALTH WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE INSPEC- PERMIT 'W!LL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION TOR HAS APPROVED THE VARIOLUS STAGES OF WORK IS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS CARD CAN BE CONSTRUCTION. PERMIT ;S ISSUED AS NOTED ABOVE. OATE THE ARRANGED FOR BY TELEPHONE OR WRITTEN NOTIFICAIION. Rp PO R �DLOT 113 10200 SF `'o tr LOT 112 ao ' LOT 114 oa � I 65 00 1 3 17 8s INITIAL ISSUE cF ND. DAIS ;DESCRIPIIDN BY i AS—BUILT FOUNDATION PLAN-LOT 113 . MARSTONS MI TS .WOODLANDS BARNSTABLE, :MASSACHUSETTS .,w,WOODLANDS ASSOCIATES REALTY. TRUST °s i I CERTIFY THAT THE FOUNDATION �`� scALE 1" so' roa Na ,ue X>1> SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS LOCATED °� PAUL A, � o so . goo Z. I ON THE GROU ©AS&INDICATED LEY No. 10517 t r UM, IMMM TAaNIt ASSOC TIS K DATE REGIS REO: LAND SURVEYOR � Y,; ' = - �� M ' Mum°m= Beg VMT MM STRM cznxgv= )u 02M Assessor's office (1st floor): 5!/'o SEPTIC SYSTEM �Ius Assessor's map and lot number ..../.Q ...`... oaf Boa4d of Health (3rd floor): .., �� d� �• SewageC;sPermit number ...... ... .... ........ ..............� �C_ LE . Engineering Department (3rd floor): /� ' M & House number:'v.-P ..............tiQ..7.............. ........ 01, Definitive PIQ0'NV oved by Planning Board __-___-___9- - __.__ �� orpv 19 APPLICATIONS P OESSED 8:30 9:30 A.M. and 1:00 2:00 P.M. only TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING • INSPECTOR APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO .......a 4 w CZtC=NC ....................................................................................................... TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ........ ivFC C 17. e, 006 � "C 7................ i2 ........................................ ................... '....... ............. 19..0 TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned hereby applies for a permit according to the following information: �0T //.3 /'+vB.a2� /��Location `. ...............................0. ...... ...... . ..........................Af�............................................... Proposed Use LF �J.-t a Zoning District ........................................................................Fire District Name of Owner E6413)-Lram (!iF- :..............Address ?• 6. 70'k 5 `�.vIc -1 r L� ................................................ ........... ...........y............................................... r � Name of Builder .......... ~L .......................................................Address .................................................................................... Nameof Architect ..................................................................Address ......... ...................................................................... Number of Rooms .............................................................•.....Foundation �v. E/ CoA/C/tFTC ............................................................ Exterior .........e.L.i9 5...,....si�F�v(rEC�.....L.F :.Roofing ...........A5,Pljl'L1 '. .. ET / V1 ~y�'................................Interior ............S.A1�!iZ6C Floors .........�. �............ ............. ......................................................... rfeating .A...........73 y.........G s..........................Plumbing ........../.........T3'e4 T l�/............................................... Fireplace ............. ..............................................................Approximate Cost ..........q5 ................ ................................... Area Diagram of Lot and' Building with Dimensions Fee ....... .. .......... ....................... OCCUPANCY PERMITS REQUIRED FOR-NEW DWELLINGS I hereby agree to conform to all the Rules and Regulations of the Town of Barnstable regarding the above construction. Name ..... ...... ...... . . .. .... .................................... 40/397 Construction Supervisor's License . GREENBRIER CORP. N '�27 o ... .......2.5. Permit for .... ...Story.........., „Single Family Pwe•lqi.n.g........... Location '...L9t...#11qj......6.7...Tanbark Road ...................... �Marstons Mills . ............................................................................... Owner Greenbrier„..Corp................... ..................... Type of Construction ..F.r.am.e............................ . ............................................................................... Plot .................... Lot ................................ . , Permit Granted ....March........I.......21....................19 89 Date of,Inspection ....................................19 T. Date Completed ....19 _1.......... 51 sh I Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services OF1ME Tor, do Thomas F.Geiler,Director Building Division zinarasrABL& rrAas. $ Tom Perry,Building Commissioner '•�Ep � 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-8624038 Fax: 508-790-6230 Approved: Fee: Permit#: rl ( $ HOME OCCUPATION REGISTRATION Date: �1(6lo3 Narne:IQX AC S L-u)�G Phone#: Address: ro� ���"JV.���\ ��" VillageGi`5o�Sw���S Name of Business:Qu4t."' � � SQ Type of Business:�'�� v ses � Map/Lot: /e�4'0 1!5 6 Zoning District/ 1 Zoning Districts RF and RC-1 require Special Permit from Zoning Board of Appeals. INTENT: It is the intent of this section to allow the residents of the Town of Barnstable to operate a home occupation within single family dwellings,subject to the provisions of Section 4-1.4 of the Zoning ordinance,provided that the activity shall not be discernible from outside the dwelling: there shall be no increase in noise or odor;no visual alteration to the premises which would suggest anything other than a residential use;no increase in traffic above normal residential volumes; and no increase in air or groundwater pollution. After"registration with the Building Inspector,a customary home occupation shall be permitted as of right subject to the following conditions: • The activity is carried on by the permanent resident of a single family residential dwelling unit,located within r that dwelling unit. • Such use occupies no more than 400 square feet of space. • There are no external alterations to the dwelling which are not customary in residential buildings,and there is no outside evidence of such use. • No.traffic will be generated in excess of normal residential volumes. • The use does not involve the production of offensive noise,vibration,smoke,dust or other particular matter, odors,electrical disturbance,heat,glare,humidity or other objectionable effects. • There is no storage or use of toxic or hazardous materials,or flammable or explosive materials,in excess of normal household quantities. • Any need for parking generated by such use shall be met on the same lot containing the Customary Home Occupation,and not within the required front yard. • There is no exterior storage or display of materials or equipment. . • There is no commercial vehicles related to the Customary Home Occupation,other than one van or one pickup truck not to exceed one ton capacity,and one trailer not to exceed 20 feet in length and not to exceed 4 tires,parked on the same lot containing the Customary Home Occupation. • No sign shall be displayed indicating the Customary Home Occupation. • If the Customary Home Occupation is listed or advertised as a business,the street address shall not be included. • No person shall be employed in the Customary Home Occupation who is not a permanent resident of the dwelling unit. I,the undersigned,have read and agree with the above restrictions for my home occupation I am registering. Applicant: Qc"rj Date: 0 06 03 Homeoc.doc Rev.5/30/03 TO ALL N W BUSINESS OWNERS DATE: R (� Fill in please: t ' APPLICANT'S '' YOUR NAME: �1�� BLJSINESS YOUR HOME ADDRESS: �G.�O is TELEPHONE F Telephone Number Nome NAME OF NEW BUSINESS _��ee. TYPE OF BUSINESS ��2e g Lam. Sca IS THIS A HOME OCCUPATION? YES N Have you been given approval from the building�division? YE NO� �Q� ADDRESS OF BUSINESS 61 Tc�v��pc�,�k � �G.S`S1SZ�K5 01.F,4`b MAP/PARCEL NUMBER When starting a new business there are several things you must do in order to be in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Town of Barnstable. This form is intended to assist you in obtaining the information you may need. Once you have obtained the required signatures, listed below,you may apply for a business certificate at the Town Clerk's Office (Ist floor-Town Hall) or if you get the business certificate first you MUST go to the following office to make sure you have all the required permits and licenses.. GO TO 200 Main St. - (corner of Yarmouth Rd. &Main Street) and you will find the following offices: 1. BUILDING COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE This individual has b en i med of ny ermit requirements that pertain to this type of business. � Authorized Siy atX COMMENTS: a �� i Vy 2. BOARD OF HEALT ! This individual has be informed o h -permit r m nts that pertain to this type of business. iz Signature COMMENTS: 3. CONSUMER AFFAIRS (LICENSING AUTHORITY) This individual ha en info��e�f li e� using requirements that pertain to this type of business. Authorized Signature* COMMENTS: Business certificates (cost$30.00 for 4 years). A business certificate ONLY REGISTERS YOUR NAME in the town (which you must do by M.G.L. -it does not give you permission to operate-you must get that through completion of the processes from the various departments involved. **SIGNIFIES A PPRO VA L FORA BUSINESS CERT/F/GATE ONL Y. Property Location: 67 TANBARK RD MM MAP ID: 100/031/002// Vision ID:5530 Other ID: Bldg#: 1 Card 1 of 1 Print Date:11/05/1999 eve ep is aveDescription Code Appraised Value Assessed Value %VEGA,MARC G as ' 21,700801 7 TANBARK RD SIDNTL 1010 73,40 73,40 ARSTONS MILLS,MA 02648 Tim a e E DATA-Barnstable, SUPPLEccoun an e . I Tax Dist. 300 Land Ct# 29500-D er.Prop. #SR Life Estate VISION DL 1 LOT 113 Notes: DL 2 CIS ID: Mal , RECORD VFuWNERYHTY— - qu vt r. Code Assessed Value Yr. Code Assessed Value Yr. Gode Assessed Value AVANO,RICHARD J C117663 06/15/1985 U I 78,OOC P 21, , ACEY,WILLIAM E III TRS C116758 02/15/198 U V 1 B 199 1010 71,90 199 1010 60960 ota. ota. , ota. 73,30t _ is signature ac now ages a visa y a ata o ector or ssessor Year lypelvescription Amount Gode escription Number Amount Comm.int. APPRAISED VALUE SUMMARY Appraised Bldg. Value(Card) 73,400 Appraised XF(B)Value(Bldg) 0 ota. Appraised OB(L)Value(Bldg) 0 NjIES - Special Land Valuesed Land lue(Bldg) 21,700 Total Appraised Card Value 95,10 Total Appraised Parcel Value 95,10 Valuation Method: Cost/Market Valuatio e o a ppraisea-ParcelYalue •- - --95-1150 I Permit ID issue Date lype Description Amount Insp.Dole o Comp. Date Comp. I omments Date ID Ud. Purpose esu t Meas/Listeil I 1/15/90 ML I a. Use Gode DescriptionZone D Frontage Depth Units nn Value ing a lFam ——RT——S-' .23 AC 270,0U0.0[ o es: , i i I otal iandnit —0. — "-- otal Cantu —ZT7ifU Property Location: 67 TANBARK RD MM MAP ID: 100/031/002// Vision ID:5530 Other ID: Bldg#: 1 Card 1 of 1 Print Date:11/05/1999 -- — CONSTRZ/CTTOND — -- --- ETCH _ —- — ement Ud. Ch. Desmlytion Commerce-0-Data Elements . Style/I ,ype 4 — ape o — Element Cd. Ch. Description Model 1 Residential Heat Grade C i rame Type Baths/PlumbingBAS Stories 1.5 1 1/2 Stories BM Occupancy 0Ceiling/Wall FHS j ooms/Prtns i lExterior Wall 1 4 Wood Shingle /o Common Wall 2 11 Clapboard Wall Height I oof Structure 3 Gable/Hip (Roof Cover 3 IlAsph/F Gls/Cmp COjYD ]A nterior Wall 1 5 Drywall 2 ement o e escripnon actor Interior Floor 1 14 Carpet omp ex 2 5 IVinyl/Asphalt Floor Adj 4 2 Unit Location Heating Fuel 3 Gas Heating Type 4 Hot Air Number of Units C Type 1 None umber of Levels /o Ownership edrooms 2 Bedrooms athrooms 2 Bathrooms 0 Full na 1.Base e 48.00 otal Rooms Rooms Size Adj.Factor 1.12671 Bath TypeGrade(Q)Index .01 YP Adj.Base Rate 54.62 32 Kitchen Style Bldg.Value New 79,745 r Year Built 1989 ff.Year Built A)1989 rml Physcl Dep uncnl Obslnc on Obslnc 7=9D USE pecl.Cond.Code Code Description Percentage pecl Cond% mg a am Overall /o Cond. 2 eprec.Bldg Value 73,400 _,. ., .. o e Description LIB Units Unit Price Yr. Dp Rt %C;nd Apr. a ue o e Description LivingArea CirossArea Eff.A rea Unit Cost Undeprec. Value BAS Mrs oor41,94 FHS Half Story,Finished 538 768 538 38.26 29,38 UBM Basement,Unfinished 0 768 154 10.9 8,41 114ross tv ease Area 1,4611 B7dg—Pa`F N -DISIJ.IUAIE PRINT V D KEY r*v CLASS 0067 TANBARK ROAD 03 RF 300 03CO 07/09/9.5 loll 00 12DC R100 031 .002 LAND/OTHER FEATURES DESCRIPTION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS `, UNITAOJ'D. UNIT Land By/Date Size Dimension SPEC.CLASS ADJ. COND. P PRICE PRICE.: ACRES/UNITS VALUEDescription T A V A N O, R I C H A R D J MAP— LOC./YR.CD. FF•Oe th/Acres #LAND 1 18j,600 CARDS IN ACCOUNT — L 10 18LOG.SIT 1 , X . .2 =100 270 r 29999.99 80999.99 .23 18600 #3LDG(S)—CARD-1 1 54.700 01 OF Cl A #DL LOT 113 OST N BATHS 1 .0 U . 1 X . C= 100 3500.0 3500. 00 1 .00 3.500 3 #PL 67 TANi3ARK RD MM ARKET — UNFINISH S X . C= 100 22.5 27_.55 576 13000-8 #RR 1690 NCOME SE A PPRAISED VALUE 73P 300 A i ARCEL SUMMARY A U AND 1860C T S LDGS 547CC A T —IMPS M OTAL 73300 F E 'CNST E N DEED REFERENC Type DATE RKp� R I O R YEAR VALUE T Book POW Ins,. MO. Yr. Sol"Price AND 18 6 C 0 A T S C117663 I06/89 P 78000 LDGS 54700 U C116758 V02/89 B 1 OTAL 7330C I R t t E BUILDING PERMIT I Number Date Type Amount S LAND LAND—ADJ INCOME ISE SP—SLDS FEATURES BLD-ADJS UNITS 18600 9500— B3.2725 3/ 39 ND 45000 Const. Total r 8 'It Norm. Obsv. Class Units Units Base Rate Adj.Rate A t Age Depr. Cond. CND Loc %R.G Rapt Cost New Adl Repl Value Stones Height Rooms Rms Bathe 1 Fie. PanywaB t1e. 01 Description 100te100 Square FeetRbi.00epl.Cost M89IN89 5 96 IMP.BY/DATE: 96 57024 54700 1 .5 4 . 2 1 .0 4.0 1.00 ML 1/90 SCALE: 1/01 .00 ELEMENTS CODE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SAS 100 61 .00 768 46848 DWELLING CNST GP:UU S 815 42 25.62 768 19676 *---------------3Z--------------* iTYLE 04 APE COD 0.0 T ! 815 . 5 ESISFI ADJAT- 0 -_-_-_ 0.6 R ! XTER.WAlCS f0 LP9D7SHINGLE ZI.d U ! ! EATIAC-TYPE- -ft AS=DARK-ATR----V.O C 1 NTER.FINISH 04 RYWALL ----------0.0 T ! ! ATril-LAY00T 12 Wit._7No_RAAL----VA U ! ! NTZ_,F.DTIACTY- _Q2 AME AS EXTER. U:O R 24 BASE 24 LoOR STRITCT Q _ 2 D JOISTIaEAP9 ---r._6 A W ! E LsDUR-C-OVER-- _J4 -AWFET------------U.0 L 0 Total Areas Aux Base 768 ! ODT-TYP-E---- JT AU_CE=A 13fl-SH a _ E BUILDING DIMENSIONS ! L F�TR I I:A L Qf V E F9A Gi E .6 T SAS W32 N24 . E32 S24 . . 615 - N24 ! ! 0U;Y6ATITfN--- ITT -OUR E0-fORC-----9-9-.9 -------------- - --- ---------------------- A W32 S24 . E32 I ! ! -----NEIZWHORH Q6 -176C-1efK9STIOWS 14I1C L *---------------32--------------X LAND TOTAL MARKET PARCEL 18600 73300 AREA 2096 VARIANCE +0 +3397 STANDARD 25 Sales Over $5,000 - Sorted by Use & Map LIVE DATA - Barnstable, MA Use Sale Q Val Proposed Map Block Lot Location Code Use Descri Date Grantor Grantee Book/Page U Code Price essed Value 272 002 003 16 ANTHONY DRIVE HY 1010 Single Fam 07/01/99 CONTRE, DENNIS & DIANE CAPE COMMUNITY HOUSING TRS INC 12382/ 073 U 11, 92,000 86,800 1 12/9/99 9:05:49AM Page 1 iAT -��s ` . ',.. ,� ._. � ;,� . � ti J� . t_ \ ` ` � • l r � . � +. ' . i _ , Sales Over $5,000 - Sorted by Use & Map LIVE DATA - Barnstable, MA Use Sale Q Val Proposed Map Block Lot Location Code Use Descri Date Grantor Grantee Book/Page U Code Price essed Value 099 014 35 CAMMETT WAY MM 1010 Single Fam 05/01/98 STEENSMA, AMY STEENSMA, AMY C148364 Q 00 77,500 67,500 099 034 81 CAMMETT WAY MM 1010 Single Fam 03/30/98 MACK, JOHN P & MARGO S MACK, JOHN P & MARGO S C147917 Q 00 169,400 162,700 100 006 003 558 RTE 149 MM 1010 Single Fam 07/09/98 BURNS, PHILIP M & EMMA JANE M BURNS, PHILIP M & EMMA JANE M 11550/ 101 Q 00 179,900 159,000 100 017 002 35 MOSS PL MM 1010 Single Fam 07/31/98 BRAGALONE, JOANNE P ET AL BRAGALONE, JOANNE P ET AL C149550 Q 00 124,000 99,300 100 021 68 TANBARK RD MM 1010 Single Fam 03/30/99 STANLEY, PETER M & ELIZABETH C GODDARD, LAURA A C152503 Q 00 129,500 98,700 100 023 001 96 TANBARK RD MM 1010 Single Fam 09/18/98 WENNERSTROM, ERIC R & WILLIS, TRACY WENNERSTROM, ERIC R C150166 Q 00 118,000 97,400 100 031 002 67 TANBARK RD MM 1010 Single Fam 03/29/99 TAVANO, RICHARD J VEGA, MARC G C152484 Q 00 86,620 95,100 i 12/9/99 8:59:26AM Page 1 1 f s + For Board use only:Comp.Perm.Application N6. '�J Date RecA Hearing �r TOWN OF BA % _ ERK Zoning Board of Appeals FU 9-WiTown Hall. Hyannis, , 02601 _b. JUL -6 P3 :52 6 1986 JUL APPLICATION for COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT ^ (Made pursuant to M.G.L. Ch.408, Secs. 20-23. and 760 C.M.R. 30.00 & 31.00) Note: Please submit fifteen (15) copies of pages 1 and 2 of this completed application farm and of all accompanying plans and documents listed in Item 19.. together with a check payable to Town of Barnstable for $75.00. [Only one (1) copy needs to be filed of documents referred to in Items 2- A.. 10-A.. 14 A. and 21-A.] Use supplemental pages if necessary to provide complete information called for by any item in this application. indicating name of applicant (Item 23 and name of development (Item 33 on each such page. If an item is not applicable. please enter N/A. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT NEATLY All ENTRIES. I Applicant(name)...Marst....... ns, Mills - Woodlands Associates. .................... . .......... (address & tel.).....P..0. Box 510, Centerville, MA 02632 771-3616. ....................................................................................................... 2.Status of applicant: (check one): Public Agency _; Non-Profit Org. _; Ltd.- Dividend Org. X 2 AAttach documentary evidence of status. 3. Name of proposed development...Marsto*ns Mills - Woodlands, 4. Type of development (check one): New construction x _ ; Rehabilitation of existing structure(sY S. Applicant's attorney:(name).....Peter L. Freeman, Wxlie, Liman & Freeman ........................... (address & tel.).....0..CamP„Street, Hyannis t MA 0260.1 775-7055 6. Applicant's architect-Iname)....Terry..Luff„and Associates ....................... (address & tel.)........6...Main„Street,,,..Hyannis t MA 02601 . ................................ 7. Applicant's engineer:(name).....Levy, Eldredge & Wainer Associates , Inc............... .. ........... (.address.& tel.)......U9„Weit_.MainStree MA „ .........................0..2...6..3..2..........7..7..5...-.....2..4..4.. .......... - - - Marstons Mills , Cammett Rd. , Old Falmouth Rd. .. B. Location of site by village and street(s)�...................... ..... .............. ........ 9. Fire district and water supplier:..,Centerville, Osterville.,..Marstons...Mil1s_,F re. .tis.tric .......................................................................... 10. Area of site in acres/sq_ft_:1,5,9 9. : acre s 6 9 6 ,9:0 0 s f �. ............. .� eye 11. Assessors map & parcel nos_ for site. ... ot s 5 3 , 5 4 , .........................5 7 map 10 0 eiow ...................... . . .................... . 11-AAttach copy of assessors map(s) showing parcels) comprising site. 12_ Zoning District(s) of site ....RF..................................................................................................................... Tanbark Rd. , Moss Place .S,ta , 13. Is elimination of any existing street(s) proposed? ..yeslf so, give name(s): lig Dri ve 14. Applicants interest in site: (check one): Owner — ; Option to purchase — ; Contract to purchase—)L. 14-A-Attach documentary evidence of interest in site. 15. Total number & type of housing units M bedrooms) proposed:............................................................ 48 Single family homes: 45 two bedroom homes ................... . ii.6........ .......................... 3 three f�ecroom homes .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... 16_ Number & type of low-or-moderate-income housing units (A bedrooms) proposed:........................ ...... 9...OP.P.ortunity,..Program,,,,"HOP",.�,.homes.z..............................I.................... .........16...tw.P...bedr.RATn HOP...homes,;,.. 3„Barnstable„Housing. J uj t ority ( "BHA" ) , tlaxoe...bed�Q.4[►?...homes.... ..BHA...two„bedroom. homes..... ................... ......... ......... ......... ........... lots 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29, 30 , 31 , 32 f [Rev. 3/3/881 1 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 APPLICATION for COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT Marstons Mills - Woodlands Associates Marstons Mills .- Woodlands Name of Applicant Name of Development Application.No. 17. List of exceptions requested from local by-laws. codes and regulations: (Specify each exception with precise reference to applicable by-law, code or regulation.) Zoninci By,-law.: S 3-3.. 4 ... 5 )...............................................nmm lot - area-aaminimum lot fronta e Conformance to, Bulk and Yar u . ons lot„ shade factor - Residential Districts : L .. **17.). S n...s .zes . �!?y, t.........................................f ' elf.onp ..a�/ /i'c4.[/. ............................... 5-2 . 1 Performance Bonds. Subdivision Regulations : a�1?royal thereunder . ...... ......... r . n. . .............. 18. List of approvals needed from other public agencies:' (Identify each local, regional, state, and federal agency and specify the approval to be sought.) none ..........................................................................................................................:.......................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... ..............................................................................................:..................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 19. List of accompanying plans and documents submitted as part of this application: (Identify each such plan and document by its title.) 1 . Marstons Mills - Woodlands Associates Partnership Agreement .................. ..................................................... ............... 2 . Purchase and Sales Agreement 3. Letter dated June 20 , 19$8 designating nominee Buyer.................. ...... 4 . Letter dated March 11", 1988 from Cape' Community Housing Trust ........ ......... ... 5. - Letter dated April 12 ` 1988 from Barnstable Selectmen *see below .................................................................................................................................................................................... 20. List of supplemental pages used to provide full, information called for by: this application ..............................................................................:........................................................................................................ ................................................................................................. ...............................................................:....................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 21.. Subsidy agency (name and address) and financing program (name) involved. 100 Cambridge St . Mas.S.ac. u,S,� s,.Execu,tive„Office„of .. ommunitie. . .s..,&...Deve.lopment. Boston,,..MA.. 02.202 .. . .... . .. . Homeownership Opportunity Program and Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency ... ............................................................................... 21-A-Attach documentary evidence of subsidy agency's determination of site-acceptability. This application for a Comprehensive Permit to build/rehabilitate low-or-moderate-income housing is made subject to the provisions of 116L Chapter 40B. Secs. 20 23. and 760 Ct1Ft 30.00 A 31.00. Marstons Mills-Woodlands Associates a toName of Applicant By Y. Date: June 27 , 1988 Authorized Signature Peter L. Freeman Typed Name of Authorized Signatory Note: If any information or documentation submitted as part of this application changes during the course of its consideration, applicant should promptly supply such changed information or documentation to the Board. making clear reference to the item, document or plan to be replaced or updated thereby. *6 . Letter dated March 11 , 1988 from Barnstable Housing Authority. 7 . Letter dated June 22 , 1988 from HOP Program 8 . Traffic Study dated June 1988 prepared by McDonough & Scully [Rev. 3/3/881 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Zoning Board of Appeals Supp. Page APPLICATION for COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT Marstons Mills-Woodlands Associates Marstons Mills Woodlands Name of Applicant Name of Development Application.No. SUPPLEMENTAL PAGE(s) - Please letter the supplemental page and indicate thereon the number of each item in the application for which additional information is provided on this page. See Supplemental Pages for: 1. Tabulation for Proposed Buildings 2 . Summary of Site Area 3. Existing Site Conditions 4 . Utilities 5 . Public Infrastructure Improvements 6 . Low or Moderate Income Housing Proposal [Rev. 3/3/881 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Zoning Board of Appeals Page 4 APPLICATION for COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT Marstnnc Mi 1 1 s-Wanrl l anag AgRor-i aces Margttons Mi 1 1 G-Wood l ands Name of Applicant Name of Development ApplicationAo. Listing of interested parties: Enter below the names and mailing addresses of • the owners of property abutting the site (i.e. abutters), • the owners of property abutting the abutters' property; • the owners of property across the street(s) from the site: all with their corresponding map and parcel numbers according to the records in the Assessors' Office at the date of this application. Please type or print only. Use additional separate page and so note if necessary. Map " Parcels Name Address Zia Code .................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................................see...at•t ached••&hee t................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................................................................:..............................:.......................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................I................. ..................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... (Rev. 3/3/881 i Marstons Mills - Woodlands Associates Application for Comprehensive Permit 1 . Tabulation for Proposed Buildings Building type: 48 one and one-half story detached single family Capes Bedrooms & bath: 45 two bedroom, 1 bath homes 3 three bedroom, 2 bath homes Floor area: 45 homes @ 768 sf ( 730 sf living space; 38 sf storage area; 0 garage area) . 3 homes @ 1200 sf ( 1124 sf living space;. 76 sf storage area; 0 garage area) . . Ground . coverage-: maximum 7 .68% (768 sf divided by minimum -10., 000 sf : lot) Estimated number residents : 173 (4`5 x 3 . 5,;.plus 3 x 5 ). Estimated number school -age children:., ;-: .40 ( 1-73 residents- mi- nus 96 parents divided by 2 ) Estimated volume of sewerage : 10 , 890 gallons per day (99 bedrooms x 110) ; septic systems designed for 3 bedrooms each or 15 , 840 gpd Anticipated number of resident's cars.; 72 ( 24 homes with one car and 24 homes with two cars) Size. of parking ayes : n.a. (private driveways for each house) 2 . Summary of Site Area Total area: 696 ,900 sf-; 15 .99 acres Building area: 36 , 864 sf; 5 . 3% Street area: 51 , 480 sf; 7 . 38% Sidewalks : none Driveways : 21 , 112 sf ( 11 ' x 40 ' ) ; 3% Total coverage: 15 . 68% Marstons Mills - Woodlands Associates Application for Comprehensive Permit 3 . Existing Site Conditions The site is approximately 15 . 23 acres of undeveloped wooded land. It is relatively flat; there are no wetlands or ponds on the site. It is not within a zone of contribution for public drinking water. It is approximately- one-half mile from the town of Barnstable dump on Flint St. The surround- ing neighborhood is residential in character with detached single family homes on 15 ,000. to 20, 000 sf lots . For a discussion of the surrounding streets and traffic patterns on streets serving the site, see the Traffic Study accompanying this application. There are no common open areas on the site, since each lot has its own substantial yard space . 4 . Utilities All utility supplies are contiguous to the 's,ite;:. . public water supply main, natural gas supply main, electrical power and telephone lines . 5 . Public Infra-Structure Improvements Public water will be provided to the homes , and the streets and drainage will be built to town standards in an- ticipation that they will become town roads . 6 . Low or Moderate Income Housing Proposal The housing to be provided is under the Commonwelath of Massachusetts Homeownership Opportunity Program ( "HOP" ) . This is a program that provides first-time home buyers with an opportunity to purchase homes at below-market prices with below market financing provided by_the_state.-___ _Marstons Mills Woodlands will provide 16�two_bedroom_ HOP__houses to be sold as follows : 3 at $60, 000 each; 4 at $63 ,000 each; 4 at $68 ,000 each; 3 at $73 , 000 each; and 2 at $78,000 . In addition, the developer has offered 5 units for sale to the Barnstable Housing Authority ( "BHA" ) for rental pur- poses , and BHA has expressed a desire to purchase. them, as follows : 3 three bedroom units at $95 , 000 each and 2 two Page 2 I Marstons Mills - Woodlands Associates Application for Comprehensive Permit bedroom units at $85 ,000 each. Under the HOP program qualified home-buyers with the following minimum income thresholds will be eligible to pur- chase the HOP homes : 3 at $60,000 : minimum income: $18 ,044 + or - 4 at $63 ,000 : minimum income: $18 ,946 + or - 4 at $68 ,000 : minimum income: $20, 450 + or - 3 at $73 ,000 : minimum income : $21 ,954 + or - 2 at $78, 000 : minimum income: $23 , 458 + or - In addition, the developer will sell the. "market" houses at a price of $108, 467 .00 . Purchasers of these houses will be eligible'.for financing under the Massachusetts Housing Fi- nance Agency ( "MHFA" ) Builder Program. . This program also provides below market rate loans, from MHFA for first time home buyers.., This `proposal `has the support of the. . . Cape Communi-ty Housing Trust ( "the Trust" ) and the Barnstable Board of.. ~- Se lectment . The developer will work with the Trust. to provide any local residency preference it desires , and an overall . buyer selection program. Page 3 _ ,i4 - �:'v:.":4s;6L��.y�u-�iil�t'-.w.>...w'l:u��:�':wv:1'F�J-.,,-:;:.f:�s y:1',c�:...m✓i�,'e''�`:`'���++:c� �r-';9,:a 'ir..� Ltis:.:�!;. c o�, � .�.�"`k� 5-a f�:s• c y r•r•'! �,;.�. �iL Assessor's office (1st floor):. � / ' o`THETO� Assessor's map and lot number .� ►......,.................. Board of Health (3rd floor): ttt/// ev, Sewage Permit number ...... ..... ............: . `�'% je Z BA639?dBLE, i Engineering Department (3rd floor): 4c� �o rasa House number o t639. \00 ..7.•..................�... '�e�aY a Dbfinitive Plan Approved by Planning Board ,_________5�a ---------19-------- . APPLICATIONS PROCESSED 8:30-9:30 A.M. and 1:00-2:00 P.M. only•. TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING INSPECTOR F APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ......... ...........................e.... .z•..C... TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION S e ns( C ���Usc ................ ... .... ... ........................................................................... ' ..........................'...................19. 0... TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned hereby applies for a permit according to the following information: Location ti 713 ��., /S,1,z c '> >'4 . c U/' JI-�i�X ,&.,s S ...................................... ........................................................................................ Proposed Use .......................................... !...................4....... ...................................................................................................... ZoningDistrict .............................:..........................................Fire District .................................................. ............................ (y c;4. ....... C '` .6.'....6�,-x �......... . Yc�.cc ( t. Name of Owner * ...........................Address ........ Nameof Builder .......S��.............................................................Address .................................................................................... • Name of Architect ..................................................................Address .......... ... ..................................................................... Number 'of Rooms ..................................................... �d w K C �� C'ei.w!`i{F T'� Foundat�on .............................................................................. C. c q. �� �� sis.s.vGc Exterior C`3 �'.� .......... ......./... ... .......................................................Roofing ...............Sf.................................................................. /le r v N y�. �.�r f ew lc 1( Floors .....!.. ..............:...................................................Interior .................................................................................... Heating �`� S..........,....... ....... . r�r.............................................Plumbing ......... ......... ^t !� ............................................................. it Fireplace N6 ......... ...............Approximate, . .Cost ... ... . :....Za::U�............................. ..... ......................................................... Area Diagram of Lot and Building with Dimensions Fee ° ! t OCCUPANCY PERMITS REQUIRED FOR NEW DWELLINGS I hereby agree to conform to all the Rules and Regulations of the Town of Barnstable regarding the above construction. l 1 Name ...�.1.. 1 ............ ..................................... Construction Supervisor's License t.da1 �5�r7 GREENBRIER CORP. A=100-31 9 No for ... ............ ......Single ..... . ......... Location J!9t...#1D.........6.7...TaXib.ar-k-Road, Marstons Mills ............................................................................... Owner . r.e.e.n.br.i.er....Corp. . .............................. .. . .. .... .. .... .... .. .. . Type of: 'Constructibin.. ............Fr...a.me.................. .... .... ............. ................................................................. Plot ........ Lot ................................ Permit Granted .....March.. 2.1..............1 1 9 89 ..... .. . .. Date of Inspection ....................................19 Date Completed .......... ...........................19 NOU-04-1999 09:26 BRRNSTPBLE HOJSING 15037799312 P.O1 Barnstable Telephone(5)S) 771-7 22 ° F'ax(5O8.177s-9312 I s,.rxs b' Leases!Housing Dept.(Setif 771-7292 r rMo `\ Housing Authority 146 South Street Hyannis, Mass.02601 ZONING VERIFICATION TO: Gloria Urenas FROM: Robert Hooper, Leased Housing Coordinator RE: Legal Rental Unit Verification Date: Address: 67 :LaoLack Rd _ Village: Unit Type: s I Fes..,; I✓ Bedroom Size: 3 , Map & Parcel No.: f 0 0 _ U 3 The owner of the above listed property is entering Into a contract with us for the rental of the property as listed above. Please verify by signing below that the unit is legal and meets all zoning requirements for a rental in the town of Barnstable. if it does not, please list reason here: Thank you for your assistance In this matter. ------------Print name Date-------------------- VIA FAX: 790-6230 MRVP Section 8 ' Rev. 9/98 Etlual Housing UpDartuni1Y Agctwv Sales Over $5, 000 - Sorted by Use & Map LIVE DATA - Barnstable, MA Use Sale Map Block Lot Location Code Use Descri Date Grantor Grantee B 099 014 35 CAMMETT WAY MM 1010 Single Fam 05/01/98 STEENSMA, AMY STEENSMA, AMY C 099 034 81 CAMMETT WAY MM 1010 Single Fam 03/30/98 MACK, JOHN P & MARGO S MACK, JOHN P & MARGO S C 100 006 003 558 RTE 149 MM 1010 Single Fam 07/09/98 BURNS, PHILIP M & EMMA JANE M BURNS, PHILIP M & EMMA JANE M 1 100 017 002 35 MOSS PL MM 1010 Single Fam 07/31/98 BRAGALONE, JOANNE P ET AL BRAGALONE, JOANNE P ET AL C 100 021 68 TANBARK RD MM 1010 Single Fam 03/30/99 STANLEY, PETER M & ELIZABETH C GODDARD, LAURA A C 100 023 001 96 TANBARK RD MM 1010 Single Fam 09/18/98 WENNERSTROM, ERIC R & WILLIS, TRACY WENNERSTROM, ERIC R C 100 031 002 67 TANBARK RD MM 1010 Single Fam 03/29/99 TAVANO, RICHARD J VEGA, MARC G C 100 043 24 STARLIGHT DR M M 1010 Single Fam 10/30/98 POLSELLI, ANTHONY & DEBORAH POLSELLI, ANTHONY & DEBORAH C i r i 12/9/99 8:27:10AM Page 1 /d-229 17 175` • 1 44 i- YYYY v4 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS � l% ` COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT 9 CHAPTER 40B 13` DECISION AND NOTICE PETITION: 1988-68 PETITIONER: MARSTONS MILLS-WOODLAND ASSOCIATES At a regularly scheduled hearing, held on August 4, 1988 and continued on August 25, 1988, notice of which was duly published in the Barnstable Patriot, and notice of which was forwarded to all interested parties pursuant to Chapter 40B of the General Laws of Massachusetts, the petitioner, MARSTONS MILLS-WOODLAND ASSOCIATES, through attorney, Peter Freeman, requested a comprehensive permit for Low and Moderate Income Housing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 40B Section 20 thru 23 of the General Laws of the, Commonwealth of Massachusetts on the property located easterly off . of Cammett Road Marstons Mills, at Map 99, Lots •53 thru, 57 ,and Map 100, Lots 13 thru 32 - containing approximately sixteen- 116 ) acres in an RF zoning district. In support of this petition, the Petitioner.-presented evidence that the following .conditions applied which would warrant the grant of a comprehensive permit. According to the plans submitted the applicant proposes to construct forty-eight ( 48 ) single family dwelling units, of which forty-five ( 45) units will contain two bedrooms and three ( 3 ) units will contain three bedrooms, all on individual lots within a grid-type subdivision. The two bedroom units will have an expansion room in the unfinished second floor. All of the proposed units are proposed to be identical cape style homes, having very few architectural differences. Twenty on oe f the units-will' be available to; fir t ime,- low,and moderate income buyers under`the=.,Homeownership•,Opportunity Program. 'Five units �`1 will Ybe;`sold to the;Barn stab l us'e Hoing"Author1ty,%for? rental-=- -* `purposes -7The=remaining twenty-seven units- i1~] `b"e--sold' at-less than -4; 0004ach- to first-time bu-yers Under the Massachusetts Housing Finance 'Agency Builder Program, which provides below market-rate loans. The Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, by. letter dated August 2, 1988, has given site approval to the project. The applicant/developer has submitted the required information and is a limited dividend entity. The Petitioner maintains that this town has not yet met the statutory minima for affordable housing units pursuant to 40B. A copy of the partnership agreement for the proposed site was submitted. A copy of the purchase and sales agreement has been submitted. a i The premises is not in a zone of contribution to public- supply well. The applicant is seeking a waiver from Section 3-1 . 4( 5) (minimum lot area/lot frontage requirements ) ; 2-3. 2 (conf.ormance to bulk and yard regulations ) ; 2-3. 4 (.lot shape factor-Residential Districts ) ; 4-3. 5( 4 ) , (7) (sign sizes) and section 5-2. 1 (Performance Bonds/When Required) . A Traffic Study has been submitted and transmitted to the DPW. The Planning Board, by letter dated August 16 , 1988 has indicated that it will oversee the subdivision as submitted in accordance with the usual procedures under the Town of Barnstable Subdivision Rules and Regulations. The Board of Health by letter dated August 23, 1988 has indicated that the project by itself does not present any more specific environmental problems that others previously allowed in the Town, and recommends that each dwelling contain not more than a total of three bedrooms. The Conservation Commission has no objection to the project. The Cape Community Housing Trust has indicated that it supports this project in its entirety. At the request of this Board, the Petitioner has set aside one lot consisting of approximately 1 /3 of an acre ,of open space to be utilized for recreational purposes for the .inhab.itants,:of the - proposed project, said jo.t-to be maintained by, .the •.Barnstab,le Housing Authority pursuant' to an agreement .entered into between: the Petitioner and. the Housing Authority. j DECISIONS AND FINDINGS FINDINGS REGARDING STANDING: Based on the evidence submitted, the Board by a motion duly made and seconded found that: 1 ) The developer is a limited dividend entity. 2) The developer has a purchase and sales agreement on the land in question and therefore has an interest in the site. 3) The developer has obtained site approval from the Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency and from the Housing Authority. And that therefore: The applicant does have standing to apply for a comprehensive permit under Chapter 40B. The votes was as follows: AYES: JANSSON, NIGHTINGALE, BOY, MCGRATH, LALLY NAYES: NONE COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT Based on the evidence submitted, and the finding that the applicant has standing to apply for a comprehensive permit under Chapter 40B, the Zoning Board of Appeals, at a public meeting. held on September 8,. 1988, by' a motion duly made and seconded voted to grant the comprehensive permit being sought. The vote was as follows: AYES: JANSSON, NIGHTINGALE, BOY, MCGRATH NAYES: LALLY In granting the comprehensive permit sought, the Zoning Board of Appeals has imposed the following conditions, the breach of which shall invalidate the permit being granted: 1 . There are to be a total of not more than forty-three ( 43 ) single family detached houses. 2'. There shall not be more than one single family house on each lot within the proposed subdivision, and not more than one garage. _ 3: At no time shall any house within the proposed development contain 'more than three -bedrooms. 4' . = .Road are to be named and built in accordance with the 'Town of Barnstable Subdivision .Regulati`ori._ ., 5. A waiver is granted from{ Section 4 L (1.1 ) of the Town Subdivision Rules and Regulation-'- allowing overhead electric_ and y telephone lines and Section '4 E,; `sidewalks. 6. No:work shall commence on the road grading, installation of drainage and construction until all required subdivision plans, profiles and drainage calculations .have been submitted and approved by the Department of Public Works engineer, and the Town Engineering Department. 7. It being the intention of the granting of this permit to satisfy the need to provide for affordable housing for this__. �s town's year round permanent_res_idents,.rto the fuflest extent` ossible the , develo er shall i v e _t o purchasers who are focal residents" the first :opportunity to:_ _ rchase--the-affordable., units. �In this regard, 1the developer shall work with the Barnstable ,In Authority,. 8. The Subdivision plan is to be approved and endorsed by the Planning Board, provided said plan has first been submitted for review to this Board and complies with those rules and regulations of the Subdivision Regulations for the Town of Barnstable to the extent the same are not waived herein. 9. Security for the completion of the subdivision in accordance with this decision, shall be deposited with the Planning Board in an amount as recommended by the Department of Public Works prior to endorsement and release for recording. v 10 The Petitioner shall prepare a set of restrictions in form suitable for recording, incorporating all of the within restrictions, and shall record the same prior to the commencement of any construction upon the premises in the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds. 11 . Responsibility for supervision of construction and completion of the subdivision is to be exercised by the Planning Board and the Department- of Public Works in accordance with the usual procedures under the 'Town of Barnstable Subdivision Rules and Regulations. . 12. Septic systems are to be installed in compliance with provisions of Massachusetts Title V and in accordance with all conditions and requirements of the Town of Barnstable Board of Health. 13. Water is to be supplied to the site at the expense of the developer, and pursuant to the direction of the Centerville, Osterville, Marstons Mills Fire District. 14. A so-called "playground lot" shall be cleared and designed, and laid out so as to establish a meaningful recreational area suitable for use by all of the inhabitants Hof the proposed project, it being understood and agreed that said area is to remain as open°space in 'perpetuity--and a,s `to be regularly maintained under the direction of,..:.the .Barnstable Housing Authority. 15... A minimum of 'f- �fteen __(�1���Si) units of the forty-three ( 43`) _units allowed shall be H . P�qual�if-ied units. 16. No waivers are to be granted from Section 4.3 Sign Regulations of the Zoning Bylaw. 17. The Applicant/Developer shall work closely with the Department of Planning and Development for the purposes of constructing units which will offer a diversity of architecture for the overall project, it being the intent of this condition to assure that the project will be aesthetically in keeping with the neighborhood. The developer shall be allowed to build "Cape" style homes provided that there is a mix of design features throughout the proposed project. 18. Waivers are granted from the Town of Barnstable Zoning Bylaws as follows: a) Section 3-1 .4 (5) minimum lot area and frontage. b) Section 2-3.2 conformance to bulk and yard regulations c) Section 5-3. 4 lot shape factor requirements Any person aggreived by this decision may appeal to the Barnstable Superior Court, as prescribed in Section 17 of Chapter 40A of the General Laws of Massachusetts by filing a Complaint in f r said Court as well as a notice of action with the Barnstable Town Clerk, within twenty ( 20) days of the filing of this decision with the Barnstable Town Clerk's Office. Chairman ^� I, \ " ' ' '� '" , Clerk of the Town of Barnstable, Barn a le Coun , assachusetts, hereby certify that twenty ( 20 ) days have elapsed since the Board of Appeals rendered its decision in the above entitled petition and that no appeal of said decision has been filed in the office of the Town Clerk. a Signed and sealed this A';' day of 1 , 1 9_1..under ' � - the pains and penalties of perjury. L?k Town Clerk DISTRIBUTION Town Clerk ; Property Owner Applicant Persons Interested Building Commissioner Public Information NOV-04-1999 09:26 ERRNSTa81_E HOUSING 15097789312 P.01 Do Barnstable (S:)tf, 77;.r__. F'ax(5JK, 77,t-931Housing Authority 6SouthStreengDc tSJ�,,,i_,�,-rt. ,, , 1y6 5„uth Street•Hyannis, Mj,,.U,bf)1 ZONING VERIFICATION TO: `Gloria Urenas FRQM: Robert Hooper, Leased Housing Coordinator RE: +- ' `'Legal Rental Unit Verification Date: _ J1LY1._9 Y ---- ---- '� Address: - Viliage: - L Unit Type: Bedroom Size: 3 Map & Parcel No.: ? /a 0 U 3 The owner of the above listed property is entering into a contract with us for the rental of the property as listed above. Please verify by signing below that the unit is legal and meets all zoning requirements for a rental in the town of Barnstable. It it does not, please list reason here: Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Signature---- --------- Print name �� --- Date-------------------- VIA FAX: 790-6230 MRVP Section 8 Rev. 9/98 Equal Housing Oppurtuni,y Agmy " -Zfl l f=L• • � (M,�i-�?- N-P/t.L.� Is.,e.�-.-� V..,�`[� c✓/ '�`~cT � �', �,f-�..• S FG.O<. .1- ,�� l� c.�:t.� 19.�.�l� CLf t,oc.-e. 4-e f Y'G.( r-p-e 5 or C-CA79 cW - S a.. _ �%c,�� /lil.wt �c !s �,.A V4- l..Q�,e.. ,1 aJ Ccc J `'C'. .�- � (n,�`�/'� �(�.,�..L�c- ('fl-n� /��J P� j�¢.L /,� �y 5�Q,w, (•�u-j Pr-6J'�G�a� f No.._8.fr__..._ F......... a THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH ..............Aw"/..............OF.... ��ILn/S•:R�.(:.C.......... Appliration for Biopoii al Work,i Tonntratrtion f luntit Application is hereby made for a Permit to Construct (✓ ) or Repair ( ) an Individual Sewage Disposal System at: p ..................................................... -•-•................................ ............. � ---••-•-•••............---••-•-•-••--....-••-••---..............•-•-••........................---• Loc i n-Address / 0 -)LO No* 6RCE /S l K .61c /7U I �F J/(] F; CN1'tL✓_itt-l_ .......... ..............................__.._.._ ._..-'-'-•----._...._...._._.._._..----- _____..... Owner �Q'- I Address a ` ---•-----•---•-----C3-`.-..-•x ....,....... .............. Installer Address Typ of Building J Size Lot...>�,.. __� Sq. feet ------------- �-, Dwelling—No. of Bedroo s- ----------------- ----------------------Expansion Attic ("Y ) Garbage Grinder (Al) p`1-I Other—Type of Building ..... ......... ......... No. of persons__..._______............__.. Showers ( ) — Cafeteria ( ) Q' Other fixit}�res -----------•..... ----••...... .. W Design Flow...............t?........_..___......_.....gallons per person per day. Total daily flow___...._-3,56..._.........__.______._gallons. WSeptic Tank—Liquid capacity.NW(?gallons Length................ Width................ Diameter................ Depth................ x Disposal Trench—No. .................... Width.................... Total Length.................... Total leaching area....................sq. ft. Seepage Pit No-----------_-------- Diameter.................... Depth below inlet.................... Total leaching area..................sq. ft. Z Other Distribution box ( ) Dosire tank ) W Percolation Test Result Performed by. F� ;. 4.:?'<<`�G.�,._^` . !f< !r?!----.--•• Date_...f �s .-F................ Test Pit No. 1................minutes per Inch Depth of Test Pit___�_`�.'_5____. Depth to ground water...^�O:^'`____.... 44 Test Pit No. 2................minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit.................... Depth to ground water........................ Ix ............................................._....--•-•-•••••-......................--•••-••--•••-•...................................-..................... O Description of Soil._.._N E'....._... ' v��•.......'`!I...._._�n 6 13 6 C x - --------•----------------- -------.-------- V ----------------------------•----------------------•----•---------------------------------...... W .............................................••••••••••-•----••------------....-••-----------•-••••-----------••--•------------------••--...-------•--•.......--•......-•------------••••............-- U Nature of Repairs or Alterations—Answer when applicable............................................................................................... •.•-•.••••••--•-----••••--•.....................•--••-•---------...........-•-----•-•--•-•--...._...........••----••----.........--•-------........--------_....._............_................-•_..... Agreement: The undersigned agrees to install the aforedescribed Individual Sewage Disposal System in accordance with the provisions of'TT LE , p S of the State Sanitary Code— The undersigned further agrees not to place the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance ha;bn issued y t board of health. Signed ...!. ..... .. ." •"" ----------------------------------- -•-- -- ---•----•-- Application Approved By.............��. � ...__._-------------- ----------- -- -- ---- Daze Application Disapproved for the following reasons:............................................................................................................... .......................•-_._..........•••-----•••••..._...-•••-•••--••••----•-•..............._ Date PermitNo....... - " ..................•....... Issued...................................................... D=' THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH /uw� Sr'-7A ( .........................................OF Tntif iratr of Tontplianrr THIS IS TO CERTIFY, That the Individual Sewage Disposal System constructed (/ ) or Repaired ( ) b 1. Wt 1 Is t'c t-(. !� S a,/ C. 0 r //z - Installer has been installed in accordance with the provisions of TITi of The State Sanitary Code as described in the �application for Disposal Works Construction Permit No-------, _'�1_..".f_____________ dated....� -,?_................ THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE THAT THE SYSTEM WILL FUNCTION SATISFACTORY. \ DATE -_11 Inspector -------------- < J THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH LJ �. p t° �.................0F......r� '.'.'I -'. ................................................................... NO.............t --•--•-•- FEE.... Via... Rapoodkn Tonotrudion Vanfit Permission is hereby granted.... ...........). 'c ' `` t c % �`'/ -••-•-•--•-••-••••---•-•••--••-•-•-••-•--•-•••••-••.....-••--......--••-•-•--•-----••••••••-••••................•--•- to Construct (./-,) or Repair ( ) an Individual Sewage Disposal System atNo.....' .!........./!•.....••--•-{nN ��G�-•-••-....R-u-�.. o �~S........fa.i.............................................................. Street as shown on the application for Disposal Works Construction Permit No._ Dated.... e— �f ........................ ••... ••••• ---•--------Health DATE........ ---•--...---- ....................................................... FORM 1255 HOBBS & WARREN. INC.. PUBLISHERS r ` OWN-OF-BARNSTABLE LOCATION �ll��r SEWAGE # VILLAGE !�Jr11�N� (� ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT '00-t i INSTALLER'S NAME & PHONE NO.--,, SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY f��✓� �!G LEACHING FACILITY:(t7Pe) , (size)'//O'r�i� NO. OF BEDROOMS v2 PRIVATE WELL PUBLIC WATER\ BUILDER OR OWNEROG'PixJ DATE PERMIT ISSUED: DATE COMPLIANCE ISSUED: VARIANCE GRANTED: Yes NO o � .E FILE COPY TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - MARSTONS MILLS - WOODLANDS ASSOCIATES Memorandum in Support of Application for Comprehensive Permit i 1. INTRODUCTION: M.G.L. Chapter 40B, SS20-23 ( "the statute" ) This case is an' application pursuant to.. M.G.L. `Chapter 40B, S21 for a Comprehensive Permit to build 48 singl'e .family-:homes. under, the- Massachusetts "Homeownership Opportunity., Program", :(or "HOP" ) . • Par- ticipation in the HOP program qualifies the housing ,.as "low. and mod- erate income" housing as defined in the statute: See HOP regula- tions 760 CMR 37 . 02 (9 ) , attached hereto. Such housing is defined in Ch. 40B, S20 as: "any housing subsidized by the federal and state government -under any program to assist the construction of low or moderate income housing as defined in the applicable federal or state statute,. whether built or operated by any public agency or any nonprofit or limited dividend organization. " The statute essentially creates a state mandate to local cities and towns to allow the construction of low and moderate income hous- ing at densities that might not otherwise be allowed by local zoning and other by-laws, as long as a proposed project is "consistent with local needs" . "Consistent with local needs" involves a balancing, as it is defined in Ch. 40B, S20, "between the regional need for low , I TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - MARSTONS MILLS-WOODLANDS ASSOC. and moderate income housing considered with the number of low income persons in the city or town affected and the need to protect the health or safety of the occupants of the proposed housing or of the I city or town, to promote better site and building design in relation to the surroundings, or to preserve open space" . The statute goes on, in 520, to define certain minimal thresh- olds of low or moderate income housing that, if attained in a city or town, would cause the local rules and regulations to • auto- matically be treated as consistent .with local -needs. The town : of Barnstable fall's short of the minima: ' the percentage required in terms of number of housing units is 10%.; Barnstable has only , 5 .24 ; . ' the percentage in terms of land. area , is 1. 5%; Barnstable has ap-. proximately . 42% . The statute also says the minimum threshold is met if the application before the Board would result in the com- mencement of construction of low or moderate income housing on sites comprising more than three-tenths of one per cent of the town' s to- tal land area zoned for residential, commercial or industrial use, or ten acres, whichever is larger, in any one calendar year. Three-tenths of one per cent of such land area is 115 . 5 acres; even if this proposal (15 .99 acres) and other affordable or low and mod- erate income housing projects under construction or proposed were all built in 1988 (which is hard to conceive) , a total of only 70. 53 acres , not 115 . 5 acres , would be built upon. See data attached Page 2 i TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - MARSTONS MILLS-WOODLANDS ASSOC. hereto as Exhibit A. The . proposed project has been. conceived and designed with the above standards in mind. The proponent believes, for all the rea- sons hereinfter set forth, that. the project is not only "consistent with local needs, " but that it will be an asset to the town and will help provide truly affordable housing. 2. STANDING AND STATUS a. ). Limited Dividend Entity The applicant, Marstons Mills - Woodland Associates, is a lim- ited dividend organization as defined in the statute. It limits, in Sections .12 .and 34A, its return on equity as required by the HOP Regulations, 760 . CMR 37 . 02 ( 8) , a copy of which is attached hereto. See the Partnership Agreement submitted herewith. b. ) Control of the Land The applicant (through one of its co-partners, Greenbrier Cor- poration, which has nominated the applicant as nominee to. take title) has a binding Purchase and Sale Agreement for purchase of the land. C. ) Site Acceptability The applicant has received a preliminary award of HOP funds Page 3 y TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS _ MARSTONS MILLS-WOODLANDS ASSOC. from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency. ( In fact, ' out of seventy applications, the applicant's-. proposal received the highest point total in the entire state on the competitive rank- ing! ) 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The locus is a . 15 .99 acre site on Cammett Road near Old Falmouth Road. , It is zoned Residential F,,- .which allows single fam- ily residential lots of one acre. The. pxoposal is- for 48 single family lots., or- a density of only,3-,unit s ..per acre:: The proposed lots would be approximately '10.,000 to .14,000 sq.ft. each, which conforms to the general development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood. In terms of . density, the HOP guidelines published by the Massachusetts Housing Partnership indicate that- the density for HOP developments shall not exceed eight (8 ) units per acre. See Guidelines attached hereto. The proposed density, at 3 units per acre, is far short of that. The land is quite flat, and wooded. There are no wetlands on the site. It is not near any public drinking water supplies or within zones of contribution for same. All on-site septic systems will fully comply with Title V of the state Sanitary Code, and it is the opinion of the project engineers (Levy, Eldredge & Wagner As- sociates, Inc. ) that the soil is more than suitable for 48 Title V TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - MARSTONS MILLS-WOODLANDS ASSOC. on-site septic systems. Any impact will be of the same degree as that made by the existing development in the neighborhood, which is comprised predominately of similarly sized house lots. The houses are all 32 'x 241 Capes ... -Of the++48-•units,-._-.2-7(or 41 -75%) are "HOP units. The minimum required for the prgram is _- o - ,---30%. Of the HOP .units, - 5 jor._ 1OV) will be sold by the applicant to •the' Barnstable Housing Authority- for --low-or-moderate-income r�a tals. - Under they program,, .,,between 5. and 10% of, the. units must be; made available to local- tiousi'ng -authorities+.= . %sixteen-=of' the HOP units will be- 2-bedr om,''-768 sq.ft. houses . 11 " _- - e They will sell for $60,000 to $78, 000 . 00 , "as shown -on the applica- tion. They will therefore be affordable to families with annual in- comes of $18 ,044.00 to $23,458. 00 . Oahe=5^Barnstable Housing"Au—// _ _- - tho y houses,-three will -bel3ibedrooms; and two, 2 bedrooms . _'The �27 market units will all be 2-15e-droom, 768 sq.ft. houses (with ex- pansion to the second floor possible) . They will sell for about $108, 467. 00, and purchasers will be eligible for financing under the MHFA Builder Program, which provides b ow market rate—loans -for' r�---- - _ ,-fi'rst time home buyers:--J This will also help affordability of even the market units. There will be no distinction between the HOP and market houses in appearance or location. They will be interspersed throughout the - site . Each home will of course have its own driveway with adequate Page 5 I TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - MARSTONS MILLS-WOODLANDS ASSOC. parking for at least 2-3 cars. With single-family development being less intense than multi-family development, and with the density be- ing virtually the same as the surrounding neighborhood, any traffic generated will be of the same intensity as that provided by the sur- rounding homes . Of course, additional vehicle trips will be added to the local traffic, but the effect is minimal . Especially when weighted against the need for affordable housing, and the. balancing test required by the "consistent with local. needs° standard, the 'im- pact must be - deemed acceptable.- See Traffic Impact, and Access Study; June 1988 , by McDonough & Scu.11y submitted with' 'the. ap.plica tion. Likewise, although the applicant does not have empirical data predicting the number of children who will be living at Woodlands, it certainly can be anticipated that the occupancy patterns will be similar to those prevailing in the comparably developed abutting subdivisions . The concerns for recreational space and safety for children (and other pedestrians) that one might have ' in a multi-family development, with large parking lots and less open space, do not obtain in the proposal at hand, with ample private yards for each house, and driveways rather than parking lots . It is significant that all of these characteristics promote the compatibility of the proposed subdivision with the neighboring prop- er-y. Will not contrast in style or density, like an apartment Paq•� TOWN OF BARNSTABLE -� ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - MARSTONS MILLS-WOODLANDS ASSOC. EXHIBIT A l -7 d 1. The percentage of .low and moderate income housing units is based on the draft list provided by the Massachusetts Executive Of- fice of Communities and Development, attached hereto. 2. The total land area of Barnstable zoned for residential, com- mercial and industrial, not including publicly owned lands, is about 60.17 square miles, or 38,509 acres. (Source: Town of. Barnstable i Assessor' s Office and Cape Cod Planning & Economic Development Com- mission. ) 'The' total area on which low or moderate -income .housing is ,built, ,.. ., in Barnstable is about 162 acres, (Source: Barnstable Housing Au-, thority) . -162 = 38 ,509 = -.42% 3 . The proposals with low or moderate income housing conceivable to be under construction in 1988.- are: 1. rSeameadow Village r �5 acres 2. E---Holly Hill - -_._ 7 acres 3:----,Stoneybr`ook Village__ . --31. 54 acres 4 . Marstons_ Mills�Woodlands 15 .99 acres 5 . Bishops -'Common 3 acres 6 . Hathaways Pond —23 acres 7. Pine Street,—Centerville � 2 acres 8 . Lombard Avenue, West Barnstable 11 acres TOTAL 70. 53 ACRES 38 , 509 acres X . 3% = 115 . 5 acres �� 8 . ♦ 1 MINUTES OF OPEN/PUBLIC HEARINGS - SEPTEMBER 8, 1988 The Chairman, Ron Jansson, opened up the hearing and explained to the public present that we would take up the unfinished business this evening in the order of which they would be expiring. We will be discussing and possibly voting on Appeal No. 1988-68, MARSTONS MILLS WOODLANDS ASSOCIATES, a Comprehensive Permit application under Chapter 40B, located at Map 99, Lots 53, 54., 55, 56, 57 and Map 100, lots 13 through 32, at Cammett Road, Marstons Mills in an RF zoning district. The Chairman then went on to read the regularly scheduled hearings for this meeting which will be taken up immediately after the discussion of the Marstons Mills Woodlands petition. The Marstons Mills Woodlands petition is a request to be allowed to construct 48-single family detached residential dwellings on a parcel of approximately 16 acres. The following Board members sat, on thIs .pet itI on: .GaII NIghtJngaIe, Luke La11y, Richard Boy,. Jim McGrath and Chairman, Jansson. Under--the proposal of the applicant he seeks to construct 45 two-bedroom units and three, three-bedroom units. Approximately 21 of these houses will be available to first time low and moderate income buyers under the HOP Program. Five units will be sold to the Barnstable Housing Authority and the remaining 27 units will be market units; however, the market units will be sold at substantially below market prices - somewhere between $100 - 110,000 or thereabouts. The property is not in a zone of contribution. The petitioner, in addition to seeking a Comprehensive Permit, is seeking an approval of their subdivision plan - they have a variety of different sized lots - some as large as 25,000 square feet and some of 9,000 square feet. Total coverage of the site including buildings, streets and driveways is about 25% - all of the units will contain their own on-site septic system. The nitrate levels will be higher than what Is recommended by the State as well as the Cape Cod Economic Plannning & Development Commission, but again the site is not in a zone of contribution. We did not receive any input from the Barnstable School Department regarding the impact this project will have on the new Marstons Mills Elementary School . We did not receive any negative comment from any of the various Town Boards involved. The Board of Selectmen indicated that are in favor of the project. Planning 8 Development recommends the project, but there are several abutters who are very concerned with the intensity. There is also concern about 2 i the lack of open space - playground areas for this project. The petitioner has taken it upon himself to work out a scheme with the Barnstable Housing Authority to give the development some open space - believe that it is about a quarter of an acre which will be maintained by the Housing Authority in perpetuity. This is gust a broad outline of the petition - the minutes of the original hearing which have been distributed to the Board Members will be helpful to you when making your decision. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, reviewed the correspondence received in order that the Board might incorporate some of these matters as conditions upon the granting of the Comprehensive Permit, if the Board is inclined to grant the permit. Following the initial hearing, we received correspondence from the Department of Public Works who had recommended that a comprehensive Traffic Study be completed - the Traffic Study was submitted to. us at the hearing and provided to the DPW. Their projections indicate about 480 trips per day generated from the adjacent roads as a result of the . development. of this project.\ j . The Planning Board, by letter dated, August 16, 1988, Indicated the following provisions should be included in the event that we grant this project. First of all that the Planning Board approve and sign the applicants Subdivision Plan, secondly, that security for the completion of the subdivision work, in accordance with the terms of our decision, in the amount recommended by the DPW be deposited with the Planning Board before the signed Plan is released. Third, that responsibility for oversight of the Subdivison be exercised by the Planning Board and the Department of Public Works in accordance with usual procedures under the Town of Barnstable, Subdivision Rules and Regulations. The Board of Health has corresponded with us, and although they expressed their concerns about the high levels of concentration of nitrates in this area, they indicated that the project by itself does not present any more specific environmental problems than others previously allowed in the area. We have the most modified Plans which include the new Play Area. Also, the Conservation Commission has no objection to the project either. The Department of Public Works, by letter dated August 1 , 1988, indicates that they have reviewed the Plan and made the following comments: The roads within the proposed Subdivision, if granted, need to be named, also recommend that as a condition of the approval , that the developer be required to submit 3 definitive Subdivision Plans including road plans, profiles, topographic .information, drainage calculations and property plans to the Town Engineer for his approval prior to ' commencing construction or grading on the site. Property Plans should be suitable for recording at the Registry of Deeds. They also recommend that the foundation installation be certified by a Registered Land Surveyor, although they would defer on that matter to the Building Inspector's wishes. The Cape Community Housing Trust has indicated to us that they support this project in its entirety. Apparently, for the record, there are going to be three houses proposed to sell at $60,000, four at 63,000, four at 68,000, three at 73,000 and two at 78,000 - 16 units that will be very affordable - they will be selling two units to the Barnstable Housing Authority for $85,000 and another three will be sold to the Barnstable Housing Authority for $95.000. The remaining 27 units will be selling for $108,467 - al.l of the houses that are proposed to be constructed would be of the cape style home, that was discussed somewhat photographs-had been submitted fore . viewing as representative of what the developer. planned.. We also have letters from the Massachusetts- Housing Financing Agency indicating that they have approved the site. We have also received .information that the developer has an interest in the site, they have testified that they are a non-profit, or limited dividend organization. We are in receipt of a letter from Dr. Grover Farrish, Chairman of the Barnstable Board of Health. They indicate their concern with the intensity of the project, but because the project was located outside of a zone of contribution to any well fields, that they do not have any specific comments either pro or contra to this project. Dr. Farrish indicated by letter dated August 23, that- the Board of Health remains of the opinion that number of bedrooms on 15.99 acres of land is an over use of land in the Town; however, this project by itself does not present any more specific environmental problems than others previously allowed by the Town. Dr. Farrish states further that it would be difficult to disallow this project in view of its quality of design and unpalatable alternatives. It is recommended; however, that each dwelling contain no more than a total of three bedrooms. It has been indicated that the bulk of the units will contain two bedrooms, with expansion - this might be something the Board might want to consider in way of restrictions. This is basically the bulk of what has been discussed regarding this particular petition, if the Board would like to discuss specifics, etc. The Chairman went on to comment regarding the neighborhood involved - the neighbors have shown opposition and concern with this 4 1 project - several letters and a petition from abutters has been submitted to the file There is some discussion as to when the petition will close - indicated as September 13 on our records. Because the time frame is so short and in view of the fact that we have such a crowded docket, as well as additional Comprehenisve Permits before the Board, important that we move forward on this. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, opened the matter up for discussion. Over all think that there would be a substantial amount of intensity on this particular parcel of land, but the tradeoff is that we are getting an affordable housing proejct that consists of detached single-family dwellings, probably the largest number of single-family affordable housing that the Town has been involved with before. - These are comments - concern over the intensity even though there Is not environmental concerns based upon what has been related to us by various Town Boards. There is also concern about the traffic that will be generated— also concerned that all of the houses will be cape-style homes. Gaal Nightinagle discussed the nitrate loading involved with this •. amount of bedrooms. - The problem with nitrate levels • in. areas that are- not in zones of contribution, is that. it really does not matter - believe that is what the Board of. Health is saying - they are concerned, but it will not have an impact upon the groundwater supply at thi.s time. Mr. ' Jansson questions where those nitrates ultimately go - no one seems to have an answer. Mr. Jansson is also concerned with the architecture of the houses - if we are going to grant this permit sure that the developer does not intend to create the old stereotype project where every house is the - same - where people lose pride in their homes as a result of that - hope that if this is granted, the developer will come up with a more imaginative scheme other than staggering the houses or changing configuration - or painting different colors. If every house is basically the same, this lends itself to the possibility of becoming a project which could fall into disrepair as a lack of pride - thought developer might be a little more imaginative. Also suggest that the pricing of the houses is extremely reasonable - do not know where one can purchase a single-family detached house in the State (brand new) for $60,000 - there might possibly be a trade off here - maybe we can encourage the builder to raise his prices somewhat to cover his expenses and reduce the intensity of the project by reducing the number of houses he proposes - only a thought. Gail Nightingale thinks that we should reduce the number of bedrooms per unit - perhaps reduce the number of units by 10%, or go with the same amount of units - to be by deed description. Richard Boy questions a Site Plan Review for the project - in order to avoid having a "project-type-atmosphere". 5 ' Chairman, Jansson, commented that perhaps they could, unfortunately at this point we do not have the time to wait for them to make those changes. The Board reviewed the most recent Subdivision Plan - perhaps that should be a recommendation of this Board. Jim Mcgrath expressed concerns with the nitrate levels and traffic issue - basically, think that it is a good plan - should not exceed three bedrooms. Gail Nightingale again discussed the way the homes are planned - could be four bedrooms with the expansion possibilities. Chairman, Jansson, concurred with that - the real problem would be that even though we impose restrictions, they are only as good as they are enforced - lacking enforcement mechanism, how do you preclude that from happening - there is discussion regarding covenants and bond issues that were raised by Board Member, Richard Boy at the previous hearing. Not certain that we could use a bond issue to cover the issue of restrictions here, because the i restrictions would ultimately accrue to the individual land owners themselves and the bond would be on that would be initially imposed upon the developer - would think that he would have rights to claim his - bond - it seems that there was talk of the developer wanting to waiver that. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, commented that he believes the developer would be required to bond the project - that is part of the Subdivision Rules and Regulations. The other issue raised was that he wanted to waive the requirement that all utilities be installed underground. Luke Lally commented about the things that bother him about this project. The density is a major concern - we are all aware of affordable housing - we have to do what we have to do in order to house people economically and intelligently, but when you take a project that goes in total contravention with all the zoning and planning done by the Town over a 30 - 40 year period, you have a situtaion with nitrate loading and in spite of the fact that A.M. Wilson, Associates, say that they are a quarter of a mile away from Princess Cove - know the area fairly well - at one time you could walk these dirt roads and shoot quail - you are not too far from an estuarial situation with cranberry bogs and water - that has a gradient slope of three degrees and two feet of top soil and then you are in to the gradient = know that it flows in a southwesterly section - not very far from the water - we are already experiencing some problems at Princess Cove with pollution - believe that it is from the cesspools in the area. Also concerned with this, as there are some very nice homes in this area that are priced quite a bit above the houses that are shown on this plan - think that we have an obligation, in spite of the State mandate, to give some protection to the property owners in the area who have established homes of some value. Luke Lally commented that he originally asked the developer why he made no provisions for a playground - that did happen, but there was no lessening of the density - some of the larger lots were made 6 smaller and the playground evolved out of pieces of lots and a new plan was drawn - does not seem to be much of a compromise - was not what he had in mind when asking for a playground - sure that buyers of these properties will be young families who are having difficulties purchasing a home today. Mr. Lally got a playground, but no relief in density and other things. It endangers the wildlife in the area, also the water table, find this particular project way out of line as far as what he conceives as creating affordable housing for residents of the Town of Barnstable - those are his comments. Richard Boy commented that he agrees with Luke Lally regarding the playground - that was surprising that they did not sacrifice one buildable lot for the playground - rather selfish on their part. Mr. Lally is ready to make a motion to deny the petition based upon the potential that we know that the developer will probably appeal to the State Appeals Board, but would try for some lessening of the density - would like you' to recall that there was a Chapter 40B `application that was presented to this Board dealing -with the Masonic. Building located on Main Street, Hyannis - the developer wanted to have 37 units there - with no available parking - we denied that petition - the developer went to the Housing Appeals ' Committee and it was solved through a series of compromises and now there are 19 units there - still no parking, but at least there are 19, rather than 37 - seems to be the basis of our being - willing to compromise - would like to see affordable housing - in order to alleviate the pain in your finger you do not remove the arm - ready to make a motion to deny. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, commented that, in view of the fact that our experiences with the Housing Appeals Committee has been one of negotiation, almost similar to having a gun at your head sometimes, would prefer if possible if the Board is inclined to do that, rather than denying the project rather see the Board impose restrictions and conditions and modify what has been submitted to us, if the developer is not satisfied, then he can appeal directly to the the Housing Appeals Committee, but at least we have given him our position rather than going through a . negotiation process that would involve this Board in meetings outside of our regularly scheduled meetings. Mr. Lally commented that he is willing to listen to any compromise that anyone is willing to bring forth - not Wiling to put 48 units on 16 acres of land because of all the reasons that he initially stated - willing to listen to any compromise. 7 Gail Nightingale feels that we should come to a compromise, rather than deny outright because we could have the same thing happen as did with Old Stage Road - the Board denied that and then we did not have a single condition that we could insert - it was approved by the Housing Committee. Gail would rather see approval with lesser amount of units, with several conditions - then the Housing Appeals would have something to negotiate. Chairman, Jansson, stated that before going into that he would like to suggest to the Board that they first make findings with reference to the applicants standing to be before the Board, after which we can address the issue of the project itself. We have to make findings as to when the site itself received approval from the subsidizing agency, establish whether or not the petitioner is a limited dividend organization and also to establish that the petitioner has in fact interest in the site to be developed before we can allow him to proceed. Chairman, Jansson, moved at this time -that we find that the applicant, based upon those three cr• iter. ia. and the evidence submitted,, does in fact--have. standing to be- before : ,the Board the--mot i on-:seconded by !Ga i.1 N i ght i nga lie: _ Luke La 1 y :feels:that a 1 1 those •.items have a l ready: been ; substantiated in• the ,initial hearing -. do-,,not feel-that we have to ,go .over that 751,th i,s . i s a d i scus-s ion and -a vote not • •.open to ,public - comments or public input -. we have . established that they do have standing, ownership, approved, by the Housing Authority. Chairman, Jansson, commented that we are required under law to find that they have standing to be before the Board. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, called for a vote. Jim McGrath voted in the affirmative, as did Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy, Luke Lally and Chairman, Jansson - we have found that the petitioner does have standing • - now let us address the issue of the project itself. Gail Nightingale stated her restrictions as follows: that because of the septic systems, the houses be limited by deed restriction to not more than three bedrooms; In accordance with DPW, the roads be built to Town standards and named; Local preference be given to- home buyers; Involve the recommendations of the Planning Board; The septic to be installed in accordance with Title V; The water supply to be at the cost of the developer, not the Fire District; 8 i Decrease the project by a percentage to bediscussed; Retain playground lot undeveloped and restricted to playground use only; If the project is approved with this number of units, that it is to be as per Plan submitted on August 25, 1988. Mr. Lally commented that he would be very interested in discussing the density percentage that Mrs. Nightingale indicates that she would want to reduce project to. Gail Nightingale would like to reduce to a minimum of 10%, which would be five houses less. Chairman, Jansson, stated that would mean 43 units on sixteen ( 16) acres of land - that is the minimum - to be about two and a half units per acre. Eugene Capoccia, Housing Coordinator for the Town of Barnstable, asked to be allowed to comment - he introduced himself to the hearing. Mr. Lally commented that before Mr. - Capoccia proceeds, he would like to know for what purpose he addresses the Board. The Chairman, Ron ,Jansson,. stated that . we will not open this hearing up again - is there input with matters raised tonight that should be of concern to the Board. Mr. Capoccia would like to address the density issue which is vital - he is aware of the concerns of the Board to protect the groundwater - aware of the letter from the Board of Health. This development had specific numbers in terms . •of its affordability - it was approved that way. By reducing the denisty, in effect you would stop this development - it could not go forward in a lower number - what you would end up doing is force the developer to then take this to the Housing Appeals Committee - we would have no choice - could not build with those numbers and those parameters at a reduced number. We have negotiated it down to the lowest possible number so that we are providing residents a home beginning at $60,000 - cannot go back tot he State and say $65 - $70,000 - it is too late for that they will not accept that - the only recourse is to either stop completely or go to the Housing Appeals Committe and seek the maximum density he would have sought in the first place - all other conditions sound reasonable, but if you touch the density, after we have negotiated hard down to the penny then think we will have wiped out the project and leave the developer only two choices, go to Housing Appeals Committee for more density or back to the original , or perhaps more, or end the development and lose the chance for really affordable homes. Mr. Capoccia commented further, that one of the things that the developer has done, rather than come in for 150 units, and reduce to the 48 units, they did more negotiating and left it at the number (more reasonable) and negotiated the price - we have a lot of i units at the lower price - that is why this development was scored number one in the State, because it was all affordable housing units - four an acre - think that he is 9 hitting the guideline that was set forth - it is not in a zone of contribution - the Town puts out some recommendations to the developers - this particular developer paid attention to everything that we asked for - negotiations centered around making them as affordable as possible. What are we doing when we have homes of $150,000 and a few at an affordable level - all of these are affordable -- if we touch that density we will be in serious trouble. Gail Nightingale questioned whether there was anything to say that if the Board decreased this by 10% , they could not increase the price by 10% - Mr. Jansson does not know if that is true - was of the impression that they could always modify the price structure. Hathaways Pond is one project that we did this with. Mr. Lally commented that it is amazing that they proceeded with the Masonic Building, Instead of the 37 units they went ahead with the 19. There .was further discussion regarding another. petition across from Pitchers Way/Route 28 - those units sold for, more than what was presented to this Board: Chairman, Jansson commented that we have- some proposed conditions upon the project - would- prefer to go ,.the route of compromise rather than see the project end here. With reference to the affordabi.iity level , find that although $60,000 is a very attractive figure - do- not see that it is inconceivable that someone could not afford $66,000 for a home, or whatever the cost is to cover the lots that could not be built upon. 'Richard Boy commented that we were reviewing the proposals - Gail Nightingale thinks that they should be reworded as conditions. Chairman, Jansson is ready to entertain a motion with findings and restrictions. Gail Nightingale moved to approve petition No. 1988-68, Marstons Mills Woodlands, Associates for the total number of units- to be 43 divided on the lots equally. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, questions when you state 43 units divided on the lot equally, you mean that each lot must be the same size, or same shape. Gail Nightingale does not want one section left as open space that could be developed - want a grid subdivision of the entire parcel with 43 units spread out on the entire parcel , with one single-family unit per lot, and each house shall be limited to three bedrooms by deed restriction - that is the main motion of Gail Nightingale - the rest would be conditions - Richard Boy seconded the motion. Luke Lally voted to deny the motion. Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy, Jim McGrath and the Chairman, Ron Jansson, all voted in the affirmative to grant the project subject to the conditions to be imposed the subject of 43 units of housing 10 to be spread out throughout the entire lot itself. No lot to contain more than one single- family- housing unit and no house to contain more than three bedroom units and that is to be restricted by deed restriction. Other restrictions are as follows: Roads are to be built according to Subdivision Rules and Regulations of the Town of Barnstable and named; No work shall commence on the road grading and construction until all the required subdivision Plans, profile and drainage calculations have been submitted to and approved by the Town Engineer, that is a proposed motion seconded by Richard Boy. Luke Lally declined to vote on the -amendments since he is not in favor of the main motion. Gail NightingaliS Richard ' Boy, Jim McGrath and Chairman, Jansson all .voted in favor. y: Additional conditions by Ga i•l- Night i'nge le: : r Local '.residents:r,preference be g i-ven.:.to home;,buyer. s for a) 1 c , un i is = .}seconded by R i chard -Boy.. Luke -La l='Vy "cast h is vote ,. to. deny. , Ga i 1 N.i ght4 nga l e, R.i chard .Boy, J i m McGrath. and Chairman, - Jansson, % cast an affirmative 'vote ` The next cond.ition deals with Planning Board. -recommendations as follows: That the Planning Board approve and sign the applicant's Subdivision Plan; That security for the completion of the Subdivision work in accordance with the terms of our decision in the amount recommended by the Department of Public Works be deposited with -the Planning Board before the signed Plan is released to the applicant for recording; That responsibility for over site of such completion be exercised by the Planning Board and the Department of Public Works, in accordance with usual procedures under the Town of Barnstable Subdivision Rules and Regulations - the motion was seconded by Richard Boy. Luke Lally voted to deny. Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy, Jim McGrath and Chairman, Jannsson voted in the affirmative. Septic systems be installed in accordance with Title V - seconded by Richard Boy. Luke Lally voted to deny. Gail Nightingale, Jim McGrath, Richard Boy and Chairman, Jansson all voted in the affirmative. Water supply will be installed at the cost of the developer seconded by Richard Boy. Luke Lally cast a negative vote. 11 Gail Nightingale, Jim McGrath, Richard Boy and Chairman, Jansson all. voted in the affirmative. I The ."so-cal°led-playground lot" shall remain undeveloped and restricted to playground use only, in accordance with the agreement reached with the Town .- seconded by Richard Boy. �.Luke' LaIfy 'cast a vote of denial . Jim McGrath, Gail N;i gtit'`..nga I e., R i chard Boy .and Chairman, Jansson all cast an af. rmat i ve vote. There: followed discussion that we should have a new Plan in order that the condition be imposed "PER PLAN SUBMITTED". This would .have to be a Plan approved by the Planning Board, a New Plan should be submitted to this Board for its review to make sure that it is not going to have an adverse impact upon the surrounding areas. The final condition would be approved PER THE PLAN SUBMITTED - seconded by Richard Boy. Luke Lally voted in the negative. ` Jim McGrath, Richard Boy, Gail Nightingale and Chairman, Jansson a] I' 'voted in the affirmative. There ' i s d i scuts i on as to whether' th'i s shou 1 d ' i-h`c i ude' the numbers to :*be "des i gnated 'as 'HOP 'un i is Suggest-"you 1 rid 1 cate' the -number of un its you wou 1'd 1 Ike, to-see as HOP'Un i is. Gai°1 'Nightingale -feels that is subject to financial matters. ' Board member, Luke Lally, states that he is not in favor• of the general motion;` the whole object of this kind of density .in a residential area that is zoned for one acre, is that there is going to be created hopefully some affordable housing - think it is important, if they are going to prevail with a four out of five member vote, that you indicate the number of units that are going to be affordable. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, commented that the difficulty with determining the number of units to be affordable, is that we have no proforma to indicate whether the project is reasonably economically feasible - they are required under State guidelines to have a minimum of 30% of their units be affordable. Gail Nightingale would like to see (before were going to have 21 HOP UNITS out of 48) . Chairman, Jansson commented that the problem with that is that if you want to reduce the density of the project then you are cutting it close - you may be destroying their incentive to put affordable housing there - 35% was discussed. 12 35% of the units shall be HOP UNITS, which will include five (5) Housing Authority units - seconded by Richard Boy. Luke Lally cast a negative vote. Jim McGrath, Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy and Chairman, Jansson all cast an affirmative vote. There is. something in the recommendation from Planning & Development regarding signs. Planning & Development recommends that no waivers be granted from the Sign Code Section of the Zoning By-law - Gail Nightingale would like to made that a condition - Richard Boy seconded that condition. Luke Lally voted in the negative. Jim McGrath, Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy and Chairman, Jansson all voted in the affirmative. The Board would like to see some sort of an Architectural Review of the overall project to make sure that it is consistent with the neighborhood, to involve Planning & Development of this Town - Richard Boy recommends that the developer and the Department of Planning & Development formulate an Architectural Review Board for• the complete project. - For clarification of the :condition- - you propose that the developer be required to work -with the Department } of Planning & Development pertaining to the architecture of the buildings themselves - the condition seconded by Chairman, Jansson. Gail Nightingale commented that her feeling is that the houses represented were nice looking homes. Mr. Boy is concerned that they will all look alike. Mr. Boy feels that the Plan is no longer valid. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, commented that the overall Subdivision Plan may have been varied, but the architectural integrity has not been modified at all , because we have not discussed that. Mr. Boy commented that it has been discussed a number of times by the Board: Gail Nightingale was not sure that Planning & Development would want to get involved in it. Mr. Boy feels that they control the Planning Department and this Board, administratively, so let them do it - .they have the staffing. Mr. Lally does not think that it will make much difference on 10,000 square feet of land with 48 units - Mr. Lally stated that he is not voting on any of this - he is not in favor of the project - he voted the main motion down.. Chairman, Jansson, called for a vote on the motion. Luke Lally voted in the negative as did Gail Nightingale. Jim McGrath, Richard Boy and Chairman, Jansson voted in the affirmataive - a three to two vote carries. f Chairman, Jansson, asked whether the Board has addressed all of the conditions regarding this proposal . Mr. Jansson has examined the recommendations from DPW - the developer has 13 requested a waiver of the condition that the utilities be installed underground. Gail Nightingale stated that she would be in favor of waiving that as a condition. Gail Nightingale would recommend that the application be approved as follows: the NEW SUBDIVISION PLAN subject to the restriction that all the requirements of the Town of Barnstable, Subdivision Rules and Regulations, except that waivers be granted as follows: 1. From Section 4, L ( 11 ) which requires all electric and telephone lines to be placed underground. Above ground, lines shall be permitted. That is proposed as a motion and seconded by Chairman, Jansson. The Board voted unanimously in favor of the motion. DPW had recommended that the foundation installation be. certified. by a registered land surveyor. but Mr. Jansson feels that should be something that falis. within the purvue of the Building Inspector's office - the .;Board agrees with that. There being no further conditions that .the Board wants to place on the project, Gail., ,Nightingale moved that the hearing be .ciosed - .seconded. by Cha.irman,.:. Jansson. .The Board voted unanimously. on the motion: i The Comprehensive Permit•_..is granted, subject to the ` conditions. as . imposed. APPEAL NO. 1988-62 MARGARET O. VERRILL The following Board Members sat on this petition: Richard Boy, Gail Nightingale, Jim McGrath, Luke Lally and Acting Chairman, Dexter Bliss. On August 2, 1988, the Board sent a Memo to Town Counsel regarding this petition, specifically, requesting information on the grandfather issue; however, we have not had a response to that correspondence. The Board reviewed the minutes of the original hearing of July 28. For . clarification regarding this petition, this site contains two lots where one of the dwellings sits on a lot that was presumed to be an individual lot; all we are doing is changing the. lot line. Board Member, Luke Lally, commented that in the interest of expediency, he finds that the request of the petitioner in petition, 1988-62, to alter the lot line of two contiguous lots on Commerce Road, West Barnstable does not appear to be substantially detrimental to the neighborhood. Recall that there was no opposition to the petition. The house is existing - the two lots are there - the house inadvertently was built over the lot line and the applicant is merely changing it so that it becomes a conforming lot, therefore, r t�� A• 1 I •` MINUTES OF OPEN/PUBLIC HEARINGS - AUGUST 25, 1988 The Chairman, Ron Jansson, called the meeting to order and informed the petitioners as well as the public present that we would hear the Comprehensive Permit, Chapter 40B, MARSTONS MILLS WOODLANDS, which was originally heard on August 4, 1988 and continued until this evening. The Board has requested information from the School Department, Planning Board and the Board of Health, specifically, requesting their input regarding the affect this petition would have. For the record, we have received correspondence from the various agencies that we requested input from. We will go through that correspondence -and share it with the public. A letter dated, August 23, 1988 was received from the Board of Health, pertaining to this particular project. - For those who were present at the last hearing, you will recall we had requested them to provide us with ,further input. The Board of Health indicated in that letter that they remain of the opinion that 48 bedrooms on 15.99 acres of, land is an over, use of the land. in the Town of. Barnstable. The question pis, thought that it was 48 houses, containing a minimum of two bedrooms each - maybe this is .just a typographical error. However, this project by itself does not present any more specific environmental problems than others previously allowed by the Town. The project is not located within a -zone of contribution to any public water supply well . Studies commissioned by the Town indicate that our drinking water supply will not be immediately affected. The project will be located a considerable idstance from any wetlands or water courses and does not appear to pose a specific threat to our shellfish harvesting areas. If one person occupied each bedroom in each dwelling, the project would generate a nitrate concentration of 13.57 mg/liter per year, this would increase to 27. 15 mg/liter per year if two persons occupied each bedroom. CCPEDC recommends nitrate concentrations no higher than 5 mg/liter, inasmuch as all of Cape Cod has been designated a sole source aquifer. The Town continues to approve high density developments, yet cannot provide adequate sewage treatment or waste disposal . The development we have permitted throughout the Town has caused irreversible environmental damage and has lowered the quality of life. Nevertheless, it would be difficult to disallow this project in view of it's quality of design and unpalatable alternatives. It is recommended; however, that each dwelling contain no more than a total of three bedrooms. The letter is signed by Grover C. Farrish, M.D. , Chairman, Board of Health, Town of Barnstable. t 2 In addition to that letter, we have correspondence from the Planning Board, dated August 16, 1988, which states as follows: On August 8, 1988, the Planning Board reviewed and discussed the referenced application and voted unanimously to express to you its approval for the housing development proposed by WOODLAND ASSOCIATES. In response to a suggestion made by the applicant's attorney and endorsed by the Department of Planning and Development, and assuming that your Board decides to issue a Comprehensive Permit as sought by the applicant, the Planning Board recommends that your decision make the following.provisions: ( 1 ) that the Planning Board approve and sign the applicant's subdivision plan, (2) that security for the completion of the subdivision work in accordance with the terms of your decision, in the amount recommended the Department of Public Works, be deposited with the Planning Board before the signed plan is released to the applicant for recording; and (3) that responsibility for oversight of such completion be exercised by the Planning Board and the DPW in accordance with usual procedures under the Town of Barnstable Subdivision Rules and Regulations. This is signed by Susan i, Rohrbach, Chairman of the Planning Board. We have also received correspondence from the Department- of Public Works which is now part of the record, from Thomas Mullen, Superintendent, DPW. In particular, Mr. Mullen, Indicated that they have reviewed the- proposed project and make the following comments regarding traffic impacts: An analysis was made for trip teneration by way of' reference to ITE Manual . They find that 480 trip ends per day can be expected to impact adjacent roads. This level of traffic could affect the level of service on adjoining through roads. Mr. Mullen indicates that it is recommended that a traffic study be conducted to determine the impact on adjoining through roads. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, stated that he does not believe that Mr. Mullen was aware of the fact that the petitioner had already submitted a Traffic Impact Report to us. Mr. Jansson has written a letter to Mr. Mullen suggesting that he review the traffic study submitted by the petitioner and then make further comment if it is necessary. We also requested input from the Barnstable Public Schools and have received a letter from them, dated August 12, 1988, from Edward Tynan, Superintendent of Schools. The Barnstable Public Schools has no comments on the impact to our schools because we lack any historical or concrete experiences with similar developments. Mr. Tynan goes on to say that perhaps by December, they will have some experiences to report, in light of the proposed developments on Old Stage Road, Centerville and other affordable housing developments being considered. 3 l We have also received this evening, a letter signed by the Selectmen, dated August 25, 1988, stating as follows: In response to the suggestions concerning a neighborhood playground, . made by the Zoning Board of Appeals during the Initial hearing of the Marstons Mills Woodlands petition, it Is our understanding that our Housing Coordinator, Mr. j . 'Eugene Capoccia, has been able to negotiate an agreement between the Developer, -the Barnstable Housing Authority and the Town of Barnstable, that will provide the land and on- going maintenance at no cost to the residents. The developer, the Greenbrier Corporation, will donate to the Barnstable Housing Authority Lot 127A, containing approximately 11 ,650 square feet of land. The Town is prepared to accept the Housing Authorities ongoing maintenance of this park as part of their payment in lieu of taxes. This agreement will mean that there will be no additional burden on the Town's Department of Public Works ., for maintenance. We believe that this plan will work,,- and, we Intend to accept ' the Authorfties" contri but I on .as part, of their payment I lieu of taxes. 1• We 'aI so- received a Ietter from the Barnstable Housing Authority, dated August "24 • 1988, signed •by Michael Toner, ' who is present this evening. This letter. fndirates that they have worked out an agreement pertaining to a "so- called" Tot Lot, or recreational playground in this vicinity, and Mr. Toner echoes the comments made by the Selectmen. That is all of the correspondence we have pertaining to this matter. Prior to the hearing tonight, we were notified that a petition has been circulated thoughout the neighborhood - this is to be submitted to the file tonight. Peter Freeman, Esquire, has viewed the petition and sees no problem with accepting same. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, read the petition aloud which states that the undersigned do hereby object to the proposed development- plans for affordable housing within the area of Cammett Road and Starlight Drive, as presented to the Town of Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals, in the Marstons Mills area. They object for the following reasons: 1. The density - 48 units on approximately 16 acres results in the overwhelming majority of lots being from 9,000 to 11 ,000 square feet in size, i .e. , approximately I/5th of an acre. 2. Over saturation of the sewage system and water supply in the entire Marstons Mills area. I 4 3. Over population of the area and overcrowding of the roadways. 4. Over taxing of the rubbish disposal syste4in the Marstons Mills area. 1 5. Over taxing the new elementary school . It has been reported that the new school will be opening at or near its total capacity. The houses will contain three to four bedrooms. 6. Notification - many of the homeowners were not individually notified of the meeting of August 4, 1988. 7. The proposed density will result in the developer cutting all the trees and undergrowth in the area; resulting in further ^endangering the' Cape wildlife. 8. The planned affordable houses, as stipulated at the August 4, 1,988 meeting, wi11 not be comparabfe or equal to the existing,-house -in the Marstons M i•1'l s. area. At this time, in view of the correspndence received, and addressed,"the tissues we had• raised,-.we •wil,l ,•ailow: Mr. e ` Freeman to .provide the Board with any further.-' fnformation, and will also give the public the opportunity to comment on the matters raised specifically tonight - those matters that we indicated that we would limit to tonight's meeting. Peter Freeman, Esquire, discussed the letter relating to the TOT LOT - Mr. Freeman will now submit a letter on behalf of his client which indicates that the applicant has modified the Site Plan in order to provide a recreational /playground lot , therefore, the applicant agrees to donate to the Barnstable Housing Authority, the lot known as Lot 127A of approximately 11 ,650 square feet - this lot would be deeded as a non-buildable lot - restricted to playground usage for the residents of this development - the exact location and size of the l-ot would be modified slightly and will be shown on the final plan to be submitted. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, questions Mr. Freeman about the lot to be for playground use - is that going to be one house less. Mr. Freeman commented that the plan has actually been modified by the Engineer to create different configuration, so that there is still 48 lots - with one additional lot not to be built on - you will see that on the six (6) copies of the Plan - indicated in yellow for identification purposes - the Plan was held up for viewing to the public and also the Plans will be available for viewing after the hearing. The second matter addressed by Mr. Freeman was a question asked at the previous hearing regarding the Number One ( 1 ) rating that the petitioner stated his application received. 5 i A letter from the Massachusetts Housing Partnership is submitted to the file. The letter is to Mr. William Dacey, III , and it addresses Mr. Dacey's interest in the scoring of his project and for which he received the highest scoring evaluated during the spring competition. The score 76.8 points is a matter of record and is awarded to the Marston's Mills home ownership proposal . In conjunction with that, someone expressed concern about the criteria and rating system submItted 'to the file is an original publication, The Homeownership Opportunity Program, Guidelines for Communities and Developers, dated January, 1988 - see Page 26 which states the criteria - percentages, etc. Finally, there is a letter from the Centerville/Osterville/Marstons Mills Fire District which states that the purpose of this letter is to inform you that Town water is available to the proposed Greenbrier Corporation project known as "Marstons Mills Woodlands" off Cammett Road in Marstons Mills. Board Member, Luke Lally, questions Mr. Freeman .as to howl you develop a playground lot without losing a plot An this development. Mr.. Freeman responded that there were several lots that were larger and they have been reduced• in a few Instances. Mr. Pellitier, Engineer for the project, was available to comment on this point. Mr. Pellitier stated that they developed the lot very carefully- - they were able to take pieces from some of the larger lots - they selected this one because it probably was the most centrally located - everyone could get to it. Also of concern was the remark made by the petitioner's application, namely, that these houses located in this type of development are not comparable to the houses in the area - could you respond to that comment. Mr. Freeman stated that essentially the facts speak for themselves - photographs of the proposed kinds of houses there were submitted at the prior hearing, typical capes, etc. in the Marstons Mills area - one-floor houses - some old bungalow-style houses - first of all do not think we are talking about architectural homogenity in of itself - there are certainly capes as well as other styles mentioned - we are talking about style, quality, general size, as fitting in with the general character of the area, which we certainly think that they do - that is what is meant by saying that they fit in - it may be a subjective matter - the house itself may be a little different. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, commented that as he reviewed his notes and reviewed the file, he noticed that the developer does intend to develop primarily a cape-style-house on each of these lots, what type of assurances can the developer give this Board that this subdivision, if it were in fact granted, or if this project were allowed by this Board, will not take on the• appearances of basically a project, where every house looks the same and the neighborhood itself that 6 you are creating does not have a character that the residents would in fact be proud of and want to maintain. Mr. Freeman stated that most importantly, the placing of the houses, that they will not simply be lined up house by house. Secondly, there is a little variation even by coloring by the paint that is used, as well as landscaping, as well as the fact that there is the possibility of garages, etc. that a person might construct in the future, breezeway, distinguishing features such as that - think that it is not unlike any other, such as Franco developments or subdivisions with similar style homes - there are also dormers visible from some of the backs - will not be terribly different from other developments in the general community. Mr. Jansson recognizes what Mr. Freeman is stating - what he is looking for in addition to siting as well as some painting, is the concern that we avoid, if this Board is to grant the permit, avoid the ability of this development to take -on the appearances of being a project, per se - the project that we have all stereotyped -years and years ago that every house is 'basically the same ._ there As , no character and people in the indi-vi.dual -homes do- not 'have any pride in ownership, recognizing that they simply do not have something that is in fact unique. Is the developer in a position, not looking for major modifications in- the event the Board wanted* to go forward with this, i,s the developer in a position to make certain modifications to some of the houses from the point of view, if they are going to be capes maybe modifying them - maybe some to be half or three quarter capes, or full capes, whatever, so that we do have a little bit of homogeneity throughout the particular project. Mr. Freeman discussed this with the petitioner, after which he expressed his concern based upon the desire of the State HOP Program people have in keeping uniformity. Mr. Freeman's suggestion is that there might be some random units that might have a different dormer - in order that they maintain what the State is trying to achieve in terms of not distinguishing between the kinds of units, think that, as Mr. Jansson stated, not major modifications might be possible structure wise. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, at this time allowed questions by the public as to what has been presented this evening. Bernard Levar of 27 Starlight Drive, Marstons Mills, asked what the price of the affordable houses would be - general price asked for the affordable houses. Mr. Freeman responded that there would be three units at 60,000, four at 63,000, four at 68,000, three at 73,000 and two at 78,000, and then the marketable units, the intent of this developer i is to have those available at 108,000. We are talking about a range of from 60,000 to 108,000. 7 William Skinner questioned whether the lot sizes are going to be 50 x 100, 100 x 100, and is so, will there be houses on 50 x 100 lots or the 100 x 100 lots - the other part of the question is how have you designated your septic tank systems so that they do not interfere with the other house in that particular neighborhood. Mr. Jansson responded that we have a recently submitted plan, just submitted tonight that will show the configuration of each particular lot which is to be built upon with the exception of the lot outlined in yellow, Lot 127A, these lots vary in size from roughly 9800 to 22,000 square feet - so they are certainly much larger than 50 x 100. With reference to the septic design, that was not a matter the Board addressed this evening, that is a matter the Board of Health has to address, and apparently they feel that they can in fact comply and the Board of Health has indicated their acquiescence in this project, but if Mr. Freeman is in a position to comment to your question we will allow him to do *so. .-Mr. Freeman responded that they will be designed and can be designed to comply with Title V of the State Sanitary Code, which is the protection being .sought , the petitioner would not proceed without that.. Mr. Anderson made comments with reference to the statement by Mr. Freeman about being able to put a garage or something else on these lots to make them look a little different; can the developer guarantee that all these houses, by their stated size in the proposal , you could put a garage on there - to put a garage on these houses of standard size and still have appropriate setbacks required by law, or breezeway, in order to deal with the sewer system-, water system, or whatever. Mr. Jansson asks for a clarification of what Mr.Anderson is asking - first of all , if any proposed additions to these houses, would in fact be able to comply with the existing setbacks and side yard requirements. Mr. Anderson stated that is partly correct. The second question of Mr. Anderson deals with the ability, if there is in fact an addition, of these projects to comply with Title V, with reference to sewering. Mr. Anderson commented that the attorney for the petitioner is saying that they can make this so that it does not look like a project, by adding a garage or breezeway. Mr. Anderson's question is whether they can do this bn the lot size and still be able to do it. Mr. Freeman stated that the answer is that the lots size wise are generally in a range 85' x 125' long - the houses are 32' wide so there is plenty of room if you just take those dimensions - there is plenty of room on the vast majority - believe the Engineer said 80% of them would have attached garage - some placed at the rear and there is plenty of access. In terms of the septic, there would be adequate room for septic, etc. 8 Mr. Anderson does not feel his questions have been answered by Mr. Freeman - these were going to be cape-type-houses, a cape-type-house generally, when you think of a cape house with either an attached garage or a garage next to it - not talking about a garage in the back yard behind the house with access to drive ten feet from the side door to get to the garage in the back yard. Talking of putting a normal cape with a garage next to it and have it look like cape house. Bill Covell , of Greenbrier Corporation, addressed this issue - he stated that he has built many houses and have put garages behind, in front, on the side, anywhere - it does not matter - it just depends upon your taste - a corner lot, sometimes it is appropriate to have a garage behind a house - it depends on your access, or what is the most aesthetic look to the 1 of. Mike. Patterson, asked for a def i�n i t-i on 'of a .cape. The on by r . appropr fate . response to that i:s that the hot p ographs- subm i tted '- he i d up for v i ew i ng - those are ;p i ctur•es of .the homes existing in the neighborhood - a house such as this would be considered a cape - similar to• a cape - not. 1- necessar-i l y i n pure �form we are to l k i ng •essent i a 1.1 y about a house with that appearance. The Chairman, -Ron Jansson,. r does not want to get into an architectural dispute here - that is not the purvue of this Board - the purvue of this Board is to determine whether or not this project is in fact consistent with local needs. We want to oblige the public - we are under mandates by the State - with reference to what type of house is going to be built is totally within the purvue of the petitioner - we do not really have much control over that. Gwen Mclain, who lives on Cammett Lane, asked whether they would have fire hydrants in the area - the fire hydrant is presently on Cammett Lane - wonder if there will be one in this area. Peter Freeman, Esquire, stated that the hydrants will be available and are shown on the Plan. Mr. Ryan, who lives on Cammett Road, would like to know what happened to the law of one house per one acre and why are we allowing the petitioner to build on less than an acre. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, explained that is why the petitioner is before the Board - this is part of the Comprehensive Permit process under Chapter 40B of the General Laws - the applicant is allowed to obviate or set aside our Zoning Ordinances with the provisio that they do so to provide affordable housing in an area which does not meet the statuatory requirements for affordable housing - 9 this Town simply has not met the State requirements for a certain amount of affordable housing in this particular Town, as a result, a developer has the right to come before the Board and seek to set aside zoning to construct a development that would contain in part affordable housing. Mr. Ryan commented that we are throwing out one law to allow some one to get away with something. The Chairman, commented that we are not throwing out a law, what we are doing is recognizing the law which was passed in 1968, the "so-called^ .Anti Snob Zoning Law to allow for affordable housing in particular Towns where there simply is not enough affordable housing - that is the law. There being no further questions by the public, we will now hear public comments on what has been presented this evening. Lee Koraso, of Starlight Drive, Marstons Mills thanked the Chairman for the courtesy extended to the public at the initial hearing - he has read,'the minutes• and found them to be accurate and thorough, etc. Addressing the issues expressed this evening,.• he is concerned about the commentary in the letter from the Board of Health and some of the statistics regarding the acceptable 1 evel of nitrates, being y something in the order of five plus units - the project ion , of this project is anywhere from 15 plus to 27 pius' units. Also, the statement of Dr. Farrish, indicating that the Town has approved similar projects in other areas - based on that, it appears this it may be necessary to to approve this - concern in addressing this as well as the letter from the School Department indicating that they have a number of projects about to be experienced and we have no history of the impact - how far do we go - how long do we wait before we suffer the damage before we halt and examine, if we have a number of these in the area, and we have not had the opportunity to experience the result and impact upon our environment, and considering that for the . last several months all of the newspapers have been addressing the serious environmental impact that we are having on the Cape, asking you to be sure before voting that four years down road we will not be in the position where we have so damaged the environment because of an effort to try to be fair to everyone, that in turn we destroy the quality of life for everyone else - that is important - not fighting the concept of the affordable housing - very concerned about the density - we are pleased that they have put in some area for the children - that is an important issue that was raised. Want to draw attention to the number of articles about the serious pollution and threat to the water table, the serious environmental impact of the effluent and the rubbish before being allowed to proceed. Wayne Anderson, an abutter, commented on the history of this project on Starlight Drive - it began in the early 1970s by r 10 John Maffei , Sr. , and his brother. John Maffeir, Sr. , passed away - they went before this Board to request to put this subdivision in - including the area that they want to put this proposed housing on - that was one subdivision - it sat there for years - it was proposed to the abutters by John Maffeir, Jr. , that land was in litigation for many years, when it was settled he was going to construct houses and complete the project - he promised the individuals on the street that the project would be completed. He went ahead and lived on the street - built three more houses in the last year and a half - they sold for approximately 150 to 165,000 dollars - he moved to Indian Lakes and built a 600,000 dollar house - he moved off the street and then this project came about. Think the main concern is the fact that fifteen years ago when we backed up Mr. Maffei , purchased houses on the street, we were led to believe that the project would be completed, and there is a plan to show the original subdivision for the area. Living on Starlight Drive, which was never intended to be a dead-end-street was to have been a circle - that circle has never been completed,, now 1t still will not be completed, but what we are going to get are 48 homes in our -back yard on what was originally designed .to be half-acre lots, which the original subdivision shows. We are bordered by Cammett Road, Old Falmouth Road, Starlight Drive and Cammett Way to the rear, this is not a piece of land that goes into a dead-end power line - this is surrounded by other homes, mostly family people, retired people, people who have been living there all their lives - it is a very high density to drop right in the middle of three streets - think that is something that should be somewhere else - realize the snob law, understand why it was proposed - agree with that - this is not a snob- law- type of discussion for this subdivision we are not living in 300,000 dollar homes - we are working people living in the area - now we are in a situation that what we thought was going to be a completed neighborhood of average homes is not going to be - the attorney can paint a picture that this will not be a project, etc. , this is a project, it will be - my concern, if you do elect to proceed to approve this 40B, that you do turn around and make them construct different types, not small capes all plunked in a row, etc. We are now going. totake 16 acres and construct 48 homes with two to three bedrooms - that is a lot of people, a lot of pollution, etc. , in a small area we are not living in 300,000 dollar homes - we are working people living in the area - now we are in a situation that what we thought was going to be a completed neighborhood of average homes is not going to be - the attorney can paint a picture that this will not be a project, etc. , this is a project, it will be - my concern, if you do elect to proceed to approve this 408, that you do turn around and make them construct different types, not small capes all plunked in a row, etc. We are *now going to take 16 acres and construct 48 homes with two to three bedrooms - that is a lot of people, a lot of tt `1 pollution, etc. , in a small area. Not necessari.ly convinced that it is wrong to do it, but think that the density is tremendous - if it is going to happen, go back to the half- acre zoning -make this the neighborhood that we are residents bought into. Commented further on the Shopping Center in Centerville and when they wanted McDonalds, now we have this large shopping center in Centerville - that is development and that happens - they just mowed down all that ' land - there were dead animals in the dirt, the trees, birds, everything - do not want to see this happen by removing every tree - we have a nice little woodsy area with skunks, etc. , have even seen deer out there. Mr. Skinner, thanked the Board for holding this extra meeting and granting the people the opportunity to express their feelings. Mr. Skinner, of Cammett Lane, thanked the Board for the opportunity to allow people to express their views. Sixteen years ago when he found his lot in the neighborhood it was reasonably priced property, now do not think -he would want to buy the property at the current price today. -Mr. Skinner's children cannot afford the price that exists on the current value of the property, even:.though. they have .fairly good jobs - he is .not against affordable .. housing - the only concern is that. the environment be protected, that the water tables be. protected, that septic systems be built so that they will not interfere, and that - there- be proper runnage, and the system used to clear the land will not be detrimental - there is a large habitat of rabbits that use to live in the area that no longer exist the amount of drainage could be a problem -also question whether there will be underground utilities - hope that they will be built in such a way that they wont interfere with anything. The number of children that will be coming into the area - there has to be provisions by the Schools to afford them the proper classroom facilities. Look at the statistics now - the number of children now in the lower level in Marstons Mills Elementary School - the new school will not be able to take on the number of children that will be coming in - not sure why the Board of Education cannot project the number of births or number of children that will be coming in to the system within the next ten years - the census people do it all the time. Here only to express his feelings about the environment - believe that we need housing, think there are hard-working-families that do need housing - we do need people to work here and to be the back bone of the system - the area cannot prosper unless there is a volume of work people in the area to to support it. ' Alternate, Board Member, Helen Wirtanen, commented that the people present tonight are not the only ones who have unhappy feelings maybe about the law, Chapter 40B, but you do have the power to contact your Senator, Representatives, etc. , tell them your feelings - think it is in the process 12 of being revised - do get in touch with them - believe they will appreciate it. Mr. Anderson, a previous speaker, commented that the following people are being contacted regarding this project: Environmental Protection Agency, Senator, Paul Tsongas, Association for the Preservation of Cape Cod, State Division of Environmental Quality Engineering, Cape Cod Historical Association, Mass Audubon Society, Cape Cod Planning & Development, Mass Citizens for Clean Environment, State Board of Health, State Division of Landfills and Greenpeace. Peter Freeman, Esquire, remarked that they respect peoples viewpoints - they have talked with the Marstons Mills Civic Association several months ago - we desire to make this as nearly compatible and as quality as possible - that is our intent. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, commented that since we- have only ; four members present, we are unable, to-take a vote; however, "be l i eve- that we have a] 1 of the Information that we- have -: requested and accordingly, unIess, f any. the Board Members . have any further ' i nput, move at th i s �t fine• that the• Marstons Mills Woodlands Association Appeal No.-' .1988-68, be: terminated- in -order to move forward with°our, deliberations - the. motion was seconded by Luke Lally. There being no further discussion the Board, consisting of Luke Lally, Gail Nightingale, Dick Boy, and the Chairman, Ron Jansson, voted in favor, the hearing terminated - the Board to deliberate on it. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, thanked all the interested parties and informed them that they should realize that the Board is confronted with very difficult decisions to make in what they consider to be in the best interest of all . There are many times when the decision that we make do not seem to be what one may not like - that is not to say that the Board will vote in favor or against this particular project, but we are bound by law to observe certain criteria in making a decision, and the affordable housing law, so that you will know for those not familiar with it, is a very tough law to deal with; we have in the past denied many affordable . housing projects to find that our vote has been overturned by the Housing Appeals Committee - want the public to be aware of that - we do very much appreciate your concern and interest in preserving your area of Town - thank you for coming this evening. 1988-70 MARIE ESTELLE RICH The applicant has appealed to the Zoning Board of Appeals and petitions for a Variance from intensity regulations at Map 79, Lot 27, 63 Cammett Road, Marstons Mills in an RF zoning district. i r 4 1 Minutes of Open/Public Hearings - August 4, 1988 The Chairman, Ron ,Jansson, called the meeting to order by informing the part°ies assembled that we were dealing with one petition this evening, namely, Appeal No. 1988-68, MARSTONS MILLS WOODLANDS, which is a Comprehensive Permit under Chapter 40B for a parcel of land located at Map 99 consisting of Lots 53 through 57 and Map 100, Lots 13 through 32. Said locus contains approximately 16 acres and is located in an RF zoning district. Present for the record are the following Board Members: James McGrath, Luke Lally, Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy and the Chairman, Ron Jansson. The Marstons Mills Woodlands Associates have applied to the Zoning Board of Appeals to allow the construction of 45 two- bedroom homes and three, three-bedroom homes. The site of the proposed construction is at the east side of Cammett Road in Marstons Mills. The two bedroom units have expansion roon in the unfinished second floor. Mr. Jansson, explained the procedure that we wi-11 follow this evening. We will allow the. petitioner to present this matter-, there are certain procedural criteria that he must comply with in order to go forward with this 40B. We will allow him to address those issues procedurally first to the Board - then address the issues of the overall project and whether or not the project is consistent with local needs. After the petitioner and his experts have presented their case to the Board, the Board will then entertain questions of the petitioner and then we will open the meeting up to the public for comments, either pro or contra. If .there are any comments regarding this petition, in view of the Fact that it has been our history that these hearings get somewhat bogged down time wise, ask that you limit your questions specifically to this particular project. Also -ask you to limit your comments to this particular project - your cooperation would be appreciated. Peter Freeman, Esquire, appeared to represent the petitioner. -submitting a memo to the file he then introduced William Dacey, III , and several members of the Greenbrier Corporation. Also present were Arlene Wilson and Jess Reiber along with Mr. Pellitier. Mr. Eugene Capoccia, Housing Coordinator for the Town of Barnstable. Also in attendence were Mr. Joseph Polcaro of the Cape Cod Housing Trust and Patricia Pap We are excited about this project -- we have spent a lot of time working with the community, the Housing Coordinator and i Cape Community Housing Trust. In addition we were eager' to find a site that was suitable and to arrive at a plan that was in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. We t 2 have received, I am told, number one placement in terms of competition for the HOP funds. there were 70 applications - we however, offered a project with a high degree of affordab ility, etc. Mr. Freeman went on to discuss the question of standing. The developer is a limited dividend entity. Attached to the Memo is information regarding the Massachusetts Regulations that show the limit on returns and equity of that organization in order to be considered. we do have those in the partnership agreement which was previously submitted. Also submitted is a Purchase and Sale agreement. Finally, in terms of site acceptability, there is a requirement when filing for a Comprehensive Permit, that the subsidizing agency, which is HOP and MHFA, give a so-called Site Approval letter which has been submitted Mr. Freeman went on to summarize the HOP aspect. This is a 16 acre site on Cammett Road in Marstons Mills. For which we propose a subdivision of 48 lots ranging from 9,000 to 14,000 square feet - most of them are 10,000 square feet or' more. These lots would be fairly compatible with the existing lots in the general neighborhood. Mr. Freeman distributed photographs of the site for the Board to view. The proposal is for ail single-family homes - to be 21 HOP units which is about 43% - this is in excess of the minimum of 30% that is required under the state law. Of the 21 units, 16 will be units that will be sold to first time home owners under the HOP Program - to be sold at prices starting at $60,000. - five of the units will be available to the Barnstable Housing Authority - the requirement is that between five to ten percent be available to the Housing Authority - the Housing Authority wants to have three, three-bedroom units and two, two-bedroom units. We propose two-bedroom capes that will have an expandable second floor. Mr. Boy wondered if the five units being offered to the Housing Authority, does that come out of the total or does that come out of the low income. Mr. Freeman responded by stating that 21 of the total are considered HOP units, of that 21 , five will be to the Housing Authority. It has been confirmed that . the other 27 units are the so-called market units - there is a greater degree of affordability in this proposal because first time home buyers are eligible for low or below market rates_ - they do_ not .get as low as the-five i ,percent HOP unit-buyers-will- have, -but they do get about-two \points below the-market,. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, asked if the attorney has submitted a schedule to the Board of the proposed prices of each one of these particular units - it has been stated that 1 is part of the package submitted by the developer to the Board at the time of submittal of the application. • 3 j Mr. Boy asked for a clarification - the applicant stated that they have 43% HOP units - that is correct, however, Mr. Boy questioned further that if they are intending to sell five to the Housing Authority how can that be accurate. Mr. Freeman commented that they are not trying to get into semantics -' they are trying to stick with what the regulations state - a so-called HOP units includes both those sold to first time home buyers and those sold to the Housing Authority - 16 units would be to the general public first time home buyers - we would be very happy to give preference to Town residents. Mr. Freeman went on to discuss the Plan which indicates the . existing road on Cammett Road - the proposal calls for the road to come as shown on the plan with a loop and cul-de-sac and continuing out fora second access onto Cammett Road. This has been reviewed by the Planning Department and other Town Boards and believe that it is a good plan and a safe one - it does not present any access •problems - also that opinion is substantiated by the Traffic Consultants . who have. submitted a traffic study, which was part of the original filing by the applicant. Would like to point out that originally there was another access coming out on Old Falmouth Road, at the suggestion of the Planning Department, because it comes in at a particular angle, they suggested that access be deleted and that is why we have the cul-de- sac. That is an indication as to the petitioner working with Town Departments. Mr. Freeman discussed compliance with setbacks in terms of sideline and front yard setbacks, obviously, they have requested for approval of smaller lots than otherwise allowed under the zoning by- law. The houses are spaced so that they have roughly those setbacks conforming with the scale of the neighborhood. In final design they might turn somewhat - have tried to site homes so that there would not be any visual monotony - this is a preliminary conceptual plan - that might change somewhat, but not substantially. There are other components of this plan that Mr. Pellitier, the Engineer will explain to the Board, such as septic design and utility design. Mr.Freeman stated that the site is not in a zone of contribution, not near any zones - it is one of the least sensitive areas in terms of impacting groundwater and drinking water, again, that was a conscious choice when looking for land. We will comply with •Title V in terms of individual septic systems, etc. The roads will be constructed according to Town standards - not looking for waivers on that. Believe that we do riot have to go to the Planning Board - we are not trying to circumvent that in terms of building the roads, the driveways, utilities, etc. We propose not to build 4 i sidewalks because of the cost factor. We have asked that we be allowed to have the electrical wires overhead as opposed to underground - in terms of utilities, we have Town water. We would comply with the construction standards of the Subdivision Rules and Regulations. In terms of health regulations, again, we would look for assistance from the Health Department as to whether it is a plan that they can approve - we have no problem in making sure that the septic systems are designed to state standards . In discussing the design of the homes, Mr. ' Freeman, commented that of the two-floor capes, the three-bedroom units would have two bedrooms on the second floor and one on the first floor with kitchen/dining area. T,he�two bedroom un.i is--wou l-d-have two-bedrooms- -onthe-f i rt`s -fel oor- and the- _ _ -- ..,� .0 f i n i'shed -upstairs --i t—ts-noted-on-the P_l an.--There is-to-4 be no-di_fferentat i_on b_etwe_er ti he: HOP-Lin i ts--and^_the_ market'-ot. un ts�-so- that_there--_i s--no- conc. e_ ntrat:i on.-N They will be cape- style-Homes of 24 x 32, typical of the area. The driveways will be about 11 x 40 feet with parking .for at least two -to three vehicles The total cover of the .enti're area is only about 15.68% which includes buildings, driveways, etc.- In terms of the impact, the traffic will be minimal to be about 480 vehicle trips per day 1n one hour there will be about 30 vehicle trips. . In terms of the nitrate loading, we have the information from the Planning Department. Mr. i Freeman submitted a report done by A. M. Wilson, Associates. Also submitted this evening is another traffic report - -the prior report submitted was a draft .with a typographical error - this one has some minor changes but it is essentially the same. Mr. Freeman discussed the memo from the Department of Planning that has been submitted to the file. Leo Pellitier, from Levy, Eldredge and Whiting, discussed the fact that the site is 16 acres and includes all the roads. At the suggestion of the Town Engineer, they originally had a leaching catch basin; however, at his suggestion we deleted the catch basin - as shown on the detailed sheet which did not go along with the .original . The third sheet shows a typical design of a three-bedroom septic system and leeching with 100% reserve - the septic system is designed to meet Title V requirements. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, commented that in view of the density of the land over all , once the septic systems are operating have you design criteria to take this into consideration - what will the impact of the septic system be once the homes are used Mr.. Pel 'Iitier stated that they have taken that An to consideration and if one looks at the third sheet it will show that they meet all of the setback requirements, all of the distances from the building to the septic tank and from, the septic tank to the leaching field. We also have 100% reserve capacity located on each individual lot - the distances between septic systems from lots meets all Title i a V. Mr. Boy questions whether that is based on a two bedroom 1 or three bedroom. Mr. Pellitier stated that the typical design is based on a three bedroom. Mr. Boy then commented, in other words, even two bedrooms would have 100% - we are told that it would be for three bedroom, regardless of the size. Gail Nightingale questions a four• bedroom - these homes could be expanded to a four bedroom. Mr. Pellitier stated that the building would contain two bedrooms on the first floor and if upstairs is expanded, one of the bedrooms on the first floor would become a dining room or country kitchen type - it would still be three bedrooms. Gail Nightingale stated that if people retained the two bedrooms downstairs and expanded the upstairs to two additional bedrooms, would this take care of it. Mr. Pellitier stated that they were designed for three bedrooms - if you went to a four bedroom, then you would need a larger septic and leaching bed. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, questioned whether Mr.Pellitier is aware of any restrictions or conditions that you would be imposing on. this development to, pre.clude anyone from adding a fourth bedroom, -obviously, with. this. type of space i.t . ]ends itself to that and people can certa i ri 1 y, do that in violation of the Building Code, but will - there -be private restrictions as well as notices. to the prospective'. purchasers of this condition that they canot have more than three bedrooms. Peter Freeman, Esquire, commented that it will be made clear to the purchaser that there may be no more than three bedrooms. Would also show the plans to purchasers - that is the intent. It will be no different than other homes in the Town - if something expands it will be volume based on the septic system design as elsewhere in the Town we do not want to make any distinctions between affordble housing. Mr. Pellitier, presented his opinion by stating that the road has been designed to meet Town standards - there is a 50 foot right-of-way with a 22 foot road. There is a loop water system. Mr. Pellitier explained how one would come in and out of the development - it is a complete loop system. There will .be a gas line coming in - each house to have a gas line The drainage system will go into leaching pits and easements as they develop the property. All of the electric system will be overhead on poles. Basically, I would say that it is a simple design - have tried to keep the shape factor for lots, less than 22 - some will have a shape factor less than 22 - have tried to meet all of the laws, except the area itself. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, questioned whether there is any attempt to set aside open space in this. proposed subdivision - Mr. Pellitier stated that there is not much room left - there is a small amount at the entry which is the buffer. 6 We have made sure that there is no access on lots that may be fronting on Cammett Road - there are several small buffers. Mr. . Boy questioned Mr. Freeman, asking about the control of the four bedrooms, still do not understand their rule regarding this, because you do not control occupancy permits to begin with - how do you- plan on controlling four bedrooms. Mr. Freeman stated that the only thingone=coul-d-do--is-put-:ate r,estri,cti.on_on=the deed:-* Mr. Boy stated that he would like to hear that if that is the applicants proposal . That would probably be the most sure fired way to do it- the only reason they would like to go a different route is because they would like to avoid that - if it is of a major concern, as Mr. Dacey stated, it could be a deed restriction that would state, no more than three bedrooms if the the Board felt that was important to impose that condition. Mr. Boy stated that he wanted to see how the applicant intended to , impose that condition. Mr: Boy stated that he wanted to see.-, - how the applicant could poIice .that know what: Mr. DaIuz -can do about it, but what will you do about it. Mr-Freeman stated that the sal.es .period is over and after, we have given them the plans and have the purchase and sale agreement that show they must be a certain way - the p l.ans:w.i,l_1..._re£1 ect-.i.f . the wall is removed, reaIisticaII � ___. y,. after-the`sa 1"e has-been:::5 made then probably-wi'1-1--be-up-to`tti`e Town. The-Cha,i;rman"��'� Ron_Janssonstated=that�the_Hous i-ng_Author i ty�r:s=go i ng-toy be_deeded=f i;v f-the_un i ts,,_tendZto�tfi:i_nk-that=-th^i s-wi-1'l faj T into-what-we a.1-17"common deed_r_estr_i-ct•ions"-a-com n -_ subd i_v.i.s-ion=r_estii ct io_n--.--wh-i ch-wou 1 d-a l-1 ow--the-Town because_they-ar_e_owner-s_=of-=�that=par_t i.cu l ar-proper-ty,-tol enforce,p thosezrestr i ct.i ons-a;l;so.-b, Even if they own one unit there they have the right as being an owner of the subdivision -to enforce the restrictions - that is a condition that the Board might want to impose ultimately. Mr. Boy then questioned whether they are going to put lighting there - it is possible to - but, usually that lighting comes from the utility company (on a pole) at the request of the Town. Mr. Freeman discussed the affordability of the project. Believe that this is why the proposal received the number one ( 1 ) rating from the State in competition. Mr. Freeman stated that there will be-three,two-bedroom3capes at 60,000,-f6ur, two-bedroom capes at= 63,000, four, two bedrooms et-68.;.000,=.,,three, two-bedrooms at 73,000 and two, two-bedroom capes at 78, 000 (HOP UNITS) . in addition there are so-called market units to be sold at 10 50.D Mr. Freeman also mentioned the income needed'4to purchase the different priced homes beginning at 18,000 to 23,000 . The proposal has the support of the Barnstable Housing Authority and the Board of Selectmen. The developer will work with p. 7 the Barnstable Housing Coordinator and build according to the Town standards The petitioner intends to ask for a waiver of bonds be posted and that the lots be released on a lot by lot basis or letter of credit Finally, in terms of submitting plans - this will be a definitive plan that can be recorded at the Registry of Deeds. Mr. Egugene Capoccia, Housing Coordinator for the Town of Barntable, gave his presentation and stated that shortly after he came on board in early March, he became aware of this proposal . He then met with the developer and found that he had addressed a number of this issues that were raised by residents and members of various Boards throughout the Town of Barnstable. In laying out the units, this developer has met with some requests by moving the location of the homes off the side so as to allow for future construction of garages. Also met with people in the area and made a presentation at that time and received comments and took into consideration those -comments. Also met in July with various departments within the Town - it .was . generally well received. Mr. -•Jansson, commented to Mr. Capoccia that_there•-seems-tom be art ng,l.y-=mias i ngrf.rom-the-f i l e-any zoomments"from`thP Pl--agn,i ng--Board-who --i.scr_espons,i b 1 e-forti"Subd i v:i s.i.an- Como 1 V n. CtFi i,s�Town }I' am:-assum i rig_-that you--have corresponded-'w i thy. i - them and wonder-if you know why they .have "not .pr.ov i ded us,_--.) with any. type- of response that would be meaningful . in --- assi"sting_us in consideration of the subdivison qual.iti,es of this particular project. c-?r- .M-F7--Capoccia. stated that-he could not'-comment as to why -J-� they -have- not responded—^ We do have commun i cat ion:-from-the T� - =Of_f_i ce--of P 1 ann 1 ng• B--Deve Vopment, but noth 1 ng-from-they-=� P1-anning--Board? Mr. Capoccia stated further that we all know that there are deficits in terms of meeting the ratio for Chapter 40B applications , this particular development addresses almost 10% of that goal , and in judging the number of applications that have come before him, many of which will not make it to this, because we discouraged applicants . from -proceeding any further, this is an opportunity to approve a development that meets. .all the criteria that we outlined. It is consistent with the immediate surroundings - the size of the lots here are similar to the lots in the general community, the size of the homes are not dissimilar, either in style or overall size from the homes in the community. In *bringing in Town water to the site, they will be improving the supply system to a number of other- residents in the community, obviously,at no cost to the other residents. This proposal is consistent with the neighborhood - it addresses itself to the issues 'in much better way thanother developments. The petitioners have gone out of their way to ensure that this is very affordable, beginning at 60, 000 is virtually the lowest that e 1 8 I we have seen, and the exciting thing is that they are all under the MHFA - so they are actually all affordable, and as pointed out, the market units are so-called market rate - still able to be purchased by first-time home buyers under the MHFA Program. Luke Lally, commented that he has heard the expression, "Number One Rating", are we privy to any of that information as to what that was based upon. Mr. Freeman commented that they have changed the HOP Program since its initial origination to a competition, we applied in the first round competition whereby the application was submitted on March 12, between that time and ultimately the first week in June, the HOP people and administrators at EOCD gave points based on various criteria in terms of design, affordability, etc. every development and planning criteria that one could think of and based upon those various criteria, whereby points were awarded - Barnstable got the largest amount of points and that is what it is based upon. Mr. Lally asks Mr. Freeman to provide the Board with that list of criteria - Mr. Freeman• would be happy to provide-that that to the . -- Board. Mr. Lally is very curious as• to .how they- could be awarded. number one ( 1 ) do not• see, any: open space:,- there As '. +. s•4 - no playground - do not see a lot .of• things - see- a gr-.id subdivision - cannot get too exc-i:ted about it - you will : have to sell me -a lot more - see °contami•nation of groundwater - this kind of concentration is what we are tryingt to avoid in the Town -not saying that I am against it - wondering what the criteria of the State is - understand that we need affordable housing, but we do not have to 'prostitute ourselves to get it either —very interested in hearing the rest of the arguments. Mr. Boy stated that he is concerned with the Subdivision Rules 8 Regulations - you want to waiver a lot of them - such as securities and covenants, etc. I would like to see the request in writing to -the Board - if you could submit that in writing it would be helpful . Mr. Freeman stated that he would be happy to supplement that - believe that we had submitted that with our application. Mr. Boy states .that there is no basis behind it, you are just saying that you would like that. Mr. Jansson commented that in the application, the petitioner has submitted waivers of those requirements, and this is a Comprehensive Permit process so we,are acting on behalf of all Town Boards and agencies - think that he has complied in that regard. Mr. Freeman commented that he is hoping to get a letter of credit or covenant for lot by lot release. Mr. Boy questions whether the Town has looked into that. Mr. Capoccia, commented that he felt that: issue could be addressed with some condition on -the property or a letter of credit:, rather than increase the cost of the units which is 9 9 i the main concern because of the very affordable price - we want to be assured from the Town's standpoint that the road is built to specifications - beside posting the bond there are other ways to do it - the letter of credit is certainly as good as the amount of cash it is written to - could be drawn upon and is less expensive for the developer to produce - find that adequate protection from our standpoint of acceptable alternative to a full fledged bond. Mr. Lally commented that it is a common occurence as far as a letter of credit as opposed to the actual funding. Mr. Jansson stated that a letter of credit is cash in the bank that should not be a concern of the Board. Mr. Boy is concerned because he has not seen it in the presentation of Mr. Freeman. That matter is addressed in the submittal of the petitioner. Mr. Jansson does not perceive that to be a major problem. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, commented that in the presentation it was ind.icated that this project would account for 10% of the outstanding. affordable -'housing. needs of th-is Town that we are bound to obtain. under: . Chapter 408 are we to. presume from that:, that a 1 1 of- these .un i-ts...ar;e to be counted in our statuatory formuIa,.and .what 1s the, ; authority..for that. .Mr. Capoccia stated that he had no ; . authority for that. Mr. Jansson stated that he thought that issue had not been resolved yet.. . Mr. Capoccia commented that from MHFA and MHP has indicated that :all units will be counted towards our goal - even the market. units. Mr. Jansson stated that he recalled the Hathaway Pond project and several of the other affordable housing projects that we have had during the past year that has in fact been an issue that has not been resolved and he would like to see how it is in fact resolved if you can provide us with information. Leading on to that, Mr. Capoccia; you have indicated that our housing goals are short by approximately 500 affordable houses, does that take in to consideration all of the comprehensive permits that this Board granted in record numbers last year. Mr. Capoccia commented that if Mr. Jansson is talking about Hathaway Pond - most of the others are close to approval and moving ahead to build, they have now received their approval until they actually start construction, would think it is not counted until it is for sure. Mr. Jansson commented, then we granted approximately 260 units of housing last year (affordable housing programs) and what you are saying is that 260 units would be in addition to the fifty, so we then would only have a short fall of about 200 units, once those are all built - is that an accurate statement. Mr. Capoccia stated that he would have to go back and check as to which, etc. Mr. Jansson commented that perhaps -that information could be provided to us - it is not that important at this moment. Mr. Jansson's next question dealt with the water 10 capacity of this particular project - it has been alluded that this would be an improvement to the community, does the Centerville/OsterviIIe/Marstons Mills Water District have the ability to provide these water resources for this project and have they contemplated this - overall volume, fire protection, etc. Mr. Capoccia has stated that the answer to that is, "yes" Mr. Jansson questioned further that we have also constructed a new school in Marstons Mills will the new school , even though I understand that it is almost filled to capacity already, have the ability to service maybe at a maximum, two children per household and I there are 48 - 96 additional children. Mr. Capoccia commented that he thinks one of the things that we should keep in mind and could certainly be followed through from in the fact that Barnstable residents seek first preference here, and also indicated that having heard from the developer their willingness to proceed under that fashion that in fact we will be looking for the same number of children. Mr. Jansson questions whether there is any in-put from the - School Department regarding how they would go about dealing with this - we are told that is ,not available at this time. Mr. Jansson questions whether the .Board .should have that information before mak i ng...the i r <dec i-s i on..;„ Not . certain that would be something that the ,School Department would be able to asses, not knowing the. numbers of, people who may be -moving in .at the time which this reaches. occupancy. , Mr.Jansson commented further about the concerns expressed by Mr. Lally about the lack of open space and other criteria - we are looking at approximately 48 units on about 15 - 16 acres of land, have you had an opportunity to evaluate the pro forma submitted by the developer to determine whether or not the figures would support more affordable housing or some additional open space to make -the project economically feasible, and if so, what are the results. Mr. Capoccia commented that they have made a real attempt and have in fact achieved one of the most affordable housing plans to come before the Town in recent past by adding open space and playgrounds, etc. , obviously, that increases the cost of each unit The. second question that arises from that is who is going to maintain those parks, those open spaces - the developer has allotted the space " 100%, as you will , to each one of the homeowners so they will have the opportunity to maintain their surroundings - giving each family the maximum space. Alternate Board Member, Jim McGrath, questions whether it was stated that the roads would be up to• Town standards the developer has stated that the roads will be up to Town standards - to be no betterments - it is indicated that they will be fully inspected by the Town. Jim McGrath further commented that in the beginning it was stated that all the units would be interspersed - the more expensive 11 1 with the less expensive - it has been established that is correct. Mr. McGrath commented that at the bottom of the first page of the application, -the lots are numbered accordingly and as such does that mean we are talking about just the HOP lots. Mr. Freeman stated that those are 'the Town Assessor's map and lot numbers. Mr. Freeman discussed some of the relevant issues brought forth. In terms of the number of residents that would occupy, we have searched hard and long to find acceptable data - SEA has come up with 2./5 cannot state that we can prove that will be the case, but in terms of the Town statistics, please find Exhibit A, submitted by the applicant the calculations based on the number of units and acreage - the 1990 census will show the number of housing units that we will have to achieve, etc. Mr. Lally had an additional question for Mr. Freeman - he questioned .the appl1 cation submitted -bearing -the list of exceptions submitted by the developer of exceptions. � . requested by the applicant - Mr. Lally understands the,_; minimum lot area and frontage requested, what . i-s . the relief being sought under the SIGN -SIZE, '-Mr:. Freeman- commented that =.� the only reason why he inserted -that was because; •sometimes :-: funding agencies requests a sign. 1 Gail Nightingale commented, that by eliminating a portion of, Starlight and Tamback Roads, are they c.utt.ing off ..anyones access. Mr. Freeman responded by stating that he does not believe so it would be access through deeds. Gail Nightingale questions whether there is a plan showing the overlay of where the roads were before. Mr. Bill Covell , of Greenbrier Corporation,brought forward a plan for viewing - it has been determined that attached to the Purchase and Sale Agreement submitted by the petitioner there is a SUBDIVISION PLAN, dated October, 1961 which indicates the original roads, etc. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, called for a five-minute-recess in order that all parties might view the Plans. The representatives from public agencies were asked to provide their comments and input regarding the petition. Mr. Polcaro, of the Cape Housing Trust, stated that he was invovied with the petition from its inception - he reviewed all of the figures and he is satisfied - he has submitted a letter to the file expressing his support. It is a real balancing going on between the need for affordable units and the ability to produce those units at the lowest possible price and provide open space for single-family detached units . It is the feeling of this Town and the Housing Trust, as well as the State, that this is the most desirable type of housing. That is one of -the reasons it scored so I r Y 12 1 high on the State system. One of the other reasons is because of the density, in fact, even though the lots are only approximately 10,000 square feet, many developments are 4, 8, 10 or 12,000 square feet - from that point of view it is very productive - that was one of the real interests in this project and one of the reasons why we are so supportive of it. We also are very happy with the developer because we have seen that he has a real expertise in building low and moderate income housing and having them look good and blend into the neighborhood. It is an art form and the developer has that art. We are very supportive of this and proud to have been a part of the process in acquiring the number one rating in the State. Jack i e Etsten, of the Off i-ce -of P_1=ann-i ng--B---Deve_l opment, stated that her department has had some involvement with this project from the beginning and we did look at the design as a whole. As you can see the main access is off Cammett Roadand there are two entrances to the subdivision which is desirable for the number of . lots being developed.. Originally there was only..one entrance = .we :felt that was inadequate and the developer did agree to put in the. -second one. The . lots are well .planned, very regular -:,.the:.overalI density s probably one of the lowest :that one will 'see in _ affordable housing - there, are some developments in .the Town .that were built prior to the, one acre zoning going into effect. It is not unusual for the Town to have a density of approximately three houses to an acre. This type of housing is mostly for young famil .ies and families with children - these are the people who have a difficult time purchasing their first house - we need to keep young families in Town to support local economy, particularly the service industry, the tourist industry, etc. we would like to see this type of housing. The HOP ownership program is is far preferable to a rental program - there is a much better chance of seeing -the affordable housing remain attractive, etc, I particularly like the design of the house - it does have expansion upstairs. We have outlined issues of concern in our Memo - the zoning exceptions from lot size and frontage requirements. As far as the subdivision approval goes, the developers can ask for approval from the Board of Appeals without having to go through the Planning Board. All I would ask is that you follow the procedures that the Planning Board does and rely upon -the Engineering Department for their expertise in reviewing final plans, etc. look to them .for recommendations. Would expect that the Board of i Appeals would sign the equivalent of the Subdivision Plan when it is prepared, rather than go to the Planning Board which would put the Planning Board into the position of having to sign a plan without a public hearing which is not legally sound to do - that would come at a later stage of the project and would look to the applicants as to when that plan would be prepared. As to the question of open space, you have a choice, you either have a grid subdivision or i 13 1 open space subdivision - the applicants have decided to go with the grid subdivision - there is sufficient area on each of the lots to have a small play area for children. Approval should be subject to provision of public water. As to the underground utilities, the Planning Board is quite often asked to waive underground utilities because of the additional cost - cannot say what that cost is - engineers may be able to provide that to you. Board Member, Luke Lally, asked whether the Planning Board of the Town agree with the theory with the State's formula for affordable housing in relation to the number of miles. Do not know whether they have taken an official position on that believe that they will take up this project on Monday evening, August 7, 1988. In approving the Subdivision Plan routinely the Board will approve it subject to the requirements of the Board of Health and they usually say in your letter of such and such - do not have the letter - that is why it is .a so vague a statement : - approval subject to. at] .the requ i.rements of Title V and.,the Board of- Hea i th pursuant to septic systems. The .,Chaffrman, Ron Jansson, ..:commeiits,'ithat he _is assuming that Jack.i a Etsten will be. to 1 k i ng- w i•th :ahe P l ann.i ng Board regarding this project - think that.. thi.s. Boar.d .would very, much like their. input especially insofar as. -it relates to Subdivision Rules and Regulations would appreciate hearing. from..them regarding their feelings -and this particular project --those aspects of this plan may very well be beyond our capacity and we will rely upon them and Engineering to give us their input. In addition, notice some contradictions in some of the figures - maybe that could be explained to me. Have a letter from the Board of Health stating that the nitrate loading on this particular project would be 27. 15 milligrams per litre per year, if two persons occupied each bedroom - looking at your projections and believe that you say that there will be 16.58 Jackie Etsten stated that there are many ways to calculate - it depends upon pounds per person, the number of people occupying the bedroom. The Board of Health is using the assumption from the State for the number of occupants per bedroom. The State routinely. says two persons per bedroom. We use SEA calculations consistently - sometimes they are higher - sometimes they are lower - in this case, they may be low because we may have a higher occupancy rate - it is a balancing act. Mr. Jansson questions further that the petitioner contends that the total project would result in 15.68 total coverage - your calculations indicate the total coverage will be about 25. 1% - your figures are 10% higher than the petitioners - can you explain that discrepancy Jackie Etsten replied "NO", but they are using the ► buildings, streets and driveways . The final question of Mr. Jansson, pertained to the general population. of this project . and its impact upon •the ability to provide governmental 14 services, in particular, concerned about the ability of the school department to provide for as many as 96 children being influxed in to that area - has Planning & Development reviewed that aspect with the school department to see what the overall impact will be. - Jackie Etsten stated that they have not - that question should be referred to the school department. You may find that some of the children are already occupants of the Town and enrolled in the school system -. people who are merely going to be relocated. Mr. Jansson requests that Planning & Development look into that they will send a memo relative to that issue on behalf of the Board of Appeals. Mr. Michael Toner, of the Barnstable Housing Authority, stated that they have an updated list of 1420 applications in the past six months - the need far exceeds what we are able to produce. We have negotiated to purchase five of these units for our clients. We very much believe that this is a valuable mechanism to provide affordable housing - we heartily endorse the concept. These units .wouid -be for . rental - almost in perpetuity - .purchase. them and retain them for forty years s . Board,. Member., Richard Boy, commented as to •whether thi s--.will be for Barnstable residents. Mr Toner stated that .the :. Statute has not. changed, ,the regulation has not changed, -we- have had discussions. as to length of -.residency :and duration;- for example, kids moving out of Town because they could. not: find housing - they are treated as residents of the Town. Six-month residency requirement is still in, a somewhat questionable period. The irony is that with the length of our waiting period, close to 90% are current residents in the Town. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, commented that his understanding is that the Housing Authority is basically the agency that is involved in the eligibility criteria of people who qualify for these programs - Mr. Toner responded that they are in the process of working out that with the Cape Community Housing Trust. In relation to all affordable housing in the Town, think this Board has expressed its concerns that if we are going to obviate zoning in this Town, we feel that the residents themselves should derive some benefit from that. - we again, would like to see some criteria established by the agency who will be responsible for evaluating applicants, to ensure that our residents are given first priority at this housing - if something could be worked out in the near future that would be very helpful . Mr. Preserby, Executive Director of the Housing Assistance Corporation, commented that they have found that there are usually fewer children than one would think. In this project there are approximatly 50 bedrooms that you talk of having children in - might have two children in some units a 15 't and no children in others - so that the number of children might be in the order of 50 in the project - a number will be pre-school age children - this is directed towards Younger families, however, there may not be as dramatic a number as we have seen before - an accurate formula needs to be projected for the number of children - believe that it is a lower number than what was discussed. Mr. Jansson, commented that he has to disagree - as long as there is a bedroom he understands that the code allows two people to occupy that bedroom you have a. minimum of 48 units involved in this project - each of them having a minimum of two bedrooms - one of which could occupy two children - that is our concern - this Board has to evaluate all project for the worst possible case scenario - it is conceivable that this could house as many as 96 children. Mr. Jansson commented further regarding the impact upon public services can be substantial in any of these type of developments. We want to ensure that the quality of life of the residents of the Town do not suffer as a result of this project. At this t i,me, th.e meet-ing was opened. to the pub 11 c for - questions. : . .. -Gwen McLain asked -if- there :wou 1 d. be.. enough room for -the + homeowner and their guests,to park ,their vehicles. Mr.. Freeman stated that there would be; adequate room to .park two to three vehicles. The homes w i'l l be c i ted._so as -to, be . ti consistent .w4th the setbacks. When she moved into the area there was a half-acre requirement- now you have a postage stamp for forty -five families. The Chairman, stated that at this time the hearing is open to questions - comments to be later i David Hamel , of Cammett Road, stated that the petitioner alluded to the fact that most of -the surrounding lots are of equal size, being one quarter acre. - believe that is not a correct statement - - most of the lots are half acre or one acre in size. Peter Freeman, Esquire, stated that what we are saying is that this is not an area of acre lots - the Assessor's Maps speak for themselves in terms of what is there. That is the information that we use when notifying abutters - we may be generalizing; however, they do have the appearance of being compatible. Mr. Hamil stated that he is a developer and all of the lots that he has worked with are at least one half acre or larger - if it is one half acre, it is pre-existing - do not believe there are any houses in the area that would have lots of the size that you intend to utilize. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, informed Mr. Hamil that is why we have Chapter 408 process to set aside zoning to allow for the substantial need that we have in this Town for affordable housing. We are all very much aware of what housing prices have done during the pasts ten years . One of 44 Dexter Bliss seconded the motion to continue the hearing for a week for limited purposes, without public comment, these matters have been made a matter of public record. Luke Lally, Dexter Bliss, Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy and Chairman, Jansson all voted' in the affirmative - the motion carried. The hearing to be continued for one week: for purposes of receiving the explanation in the difference in the builders figures for developing the property, as well as the Town figures, as well as the issue of the Board of Health -- we will make that a matter of public record, but will not accept public comment on those issues at that time,. APPEAL NO. 19 ;0-68 MARSTONS MILLS WOODLANDS The Board discussed this hearing which is a Comprehensive Permit Application. Mr. William Covell was present to answer any questions of the Board. Discussed, is the Subdivison F1a_.n presented for .review of the Board. The Board is reviewing the, Subdivision Flan prior, tq signing same. This has. been reduced to 43 lots and indicates the TOT LOT which is Lot 126.' There are- no other - hots containing open , space. There are tobe no driveways or houses facing `o^to Cammett Road. The lots are basically the same. There was a pork chop lot in the middle which has been removed. The Board compared the original plan with the Subdivision Flan. The dotted lines on the Plan show the old road layout (Board should disregard those) on there for Land Court purposes, only. There are legal rights in the right-of-ways that cannot be e:finguished unless you have a case in Land Court to extinguish that. That stays on the Flan until such time as it can be accomplished - that takes time. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, commented that Mr. Covell is saying, because of the configuration of the roads; that the developer is- left. with the lots being irregular in shape -- was there any way that you could reconfiure these roads to make the lots more uniform and also give the lots more space - one of the concerns of the Board is to make the lots larger - they are all over 10, 000 square feet. The Beard had wanted to see the size of the lots increased overall . Gail Nightingale commented about the lots - why could they not t"ke the TOT LOT and put that on the larger lot that they could put a house upon, so that you would have more open space. Gail questions why change these lots. TO �. 4 5 In reviewing the decision of the Board, it appears that there is nothing specific said - they stated that the lets would be reduced to 43, no indication that the Board wanted the developer to apportion them in a certain spay. The Plan has been approved by the Engineering Department. Chairman, Jansson stated that the reason that we reduced the proposal , although it may not appear in the decision, was because the Board wins concerned with the overall lot size - made that part of their public record. The developer is no►i having the large lots made larger - it does not address the concerns of the Board. The Board was trying to get a uniform appearance. Mr. Jansson asks that some consideration be given to making some of the small lots larger. . Mr'. Covell stated there is not much they can do. Gail Nightingale stated that the Plan does not do what she had wanted it to - cannot understand that now because it is Land Court and can only build on certain portions of the road, why was it not. brought out at the hearing. ~ Chairman, Jansson is' concer.ned that every single house is . almost right on the road - we want to avoid the .appearanf_e of a. development: do not want it- to look .Ii.k:e 'Ti:nseltown . Richard. Boy 'rer_dmmended that the Board accept the Plan, as j submitted. Gail Nightingale stated that it does not do what she warts if you have three votes, pass it: Luke Lally abstained from voting on the Plan. Richard Boy made .a motion to accept the Plan as submitted - seconded by Jim McGrath. The recommendation of Richard Boy was based upon the study that Town Counsel has put into this as well as the cost factor. If Town Counsel tells the Board that the petitioner has done the best possible, we will accept it. The concerns of Gail Nightingale are that, u!hen the petitioner revised the Subdivision Plan, it does not reflect what we believed would be done regarding increasing the of the lots, also the idea of the road being Land Courted - .that was never presented at the hearing, and for that reason you cannot build there. If we had approved the 40 houses, there would have been a house there - Gail Nightingale is against it. < Jim McGrath, Richard Boy and Chairman, Jansson all voted in Favor - the vote carries on that basis - three to one - on EE` member abstained. This is not approving -the location of the houses - the Board would like to see changes in that, and as stated in the decision of the Board, we want arch i t.actural changes - the Board is not accepting the positioning of the houses as shoran on the Flan. The Chairman, Ron Jansson, told Mr. Covell that the Board will not sign the Subdivision Flan because the names of the Board Members are not on file at the Req`istr y of needs and it would create confusion. We are told by Assistant Town Counsel , Ruth Weil, that the Board of Appeals approve-IA tile nl Flan for the . Comprehensive Permit. Richard Boy made a motion to adjourn - seconded by Ron Jansson. The Board voted unanimously to adjourn the hearing at 11:20 p. m. p. �~ • �°��� Barnstable ewPNsrABIE. a Telephone(508)771-7222 siv ,,e Ho i sing Authority 146 South Street•Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 "rEo wun` September 28,' I 4=. S4 OCT — 4 Ron S.-Jansson, Chairman Town of Barnstable 4 Zoning Board of Appeals ` 230 South Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Dear Chairman Jansson: Thank you for your letter regarding the comprehensive permit issued for the Woodlands project in Marstons Mills. The Barnstable Housing Authority concurs with the Zoning Board of Appeals that the BHA is responsible for maintenance of the so- called one-third acre of open space. BHA files do not indicate.why the past executive—, director did not hold the builder.accountable for the conversion of.the'lot into a meaningful recreational area. The BHA will continue to meet,our responsibilities to keep the lot clear of.debris.and work with the;neighborhood group on the use of the lot. The BHA shares your'concern regarding tenant behavior. Upon learning of the behavior of the family at 95 Tanbark Road, the BHA was actively involved in a solution. I have enclosed a copy of BHA action in this matter. The family would have been evicted even sooner if one neighbor had not been involved in an altercation with the son of the tenant. This very public action resulted in a court order delay of the scheduled eviction hearing. There are several items in this packet for your review. The first item is a chronology of events up to April 7, 1994. The matter went to District Court on April 21, 1994. The tenants, abiding by a court agreement, were out of the.property by April 30, 1994. The second item is the letter the BHA Board requested I send to Mr. Schulman. Mr. Schulman attended three monthly board meetings and spoke with the Commissioners at each meeting. Following the May meeting he spoke to Councilor Gobeil regarding the lack of responsive of the Board to his concerns. The Commissioners had a different view of their cooperativeness with Mr. Schulman and asked I write to him. His four page response you have. Part of the BHA follow-up included a meeting, arranged by Chairman Burlingame and Councilor Gobeil, with neighbors. The meeting was held at the Marstons Mills East Elementary School, on August 25, 1994. The enclosed letter from Equal Housing Opportunity Agency 'w Craig.is the BHA response to both the Schulman letter and issues raised at the meeting.. While I have not included several of the documents requested by the residents, please feel free to contact me if you wish to see this material, such as the Tenant Selection Policy or my job description. If following your review of this material you wish to sit and discuss this matter further, please feel free to contact me at 771-7222. The BHA appreciates your interest in this matter. Sincerely, Thomas K. Lynch Executive Director Enclosures tiJ DATE. March 16, 1994 TO: Board of Commissioners FROM: Thomas Lynch, Executive Director RE: 95 Tanbark Road-Chronology 4/9/89 Family Leased Premises. 9/14/90 Neighbor complaint (41 Tanbark Rd.) oldest boy threatened her 5 yr. old daughter with knife. Police not called. 9/14/90 Neighbor complaint (35 Tanbark)oldest boy beating up neighbor's young daughter, brother intervened and had tooth broken. Police not called. j 6/28/93 Neighbor's written complaint received by BHA. 6/29/93 Notice for Informal Conference sent to the tenant. 7/8/93 BHA notified by tenant that oldest son moved out of unit. 7/8/93 Tenant attended Informal Conference concerning alleged complaints against the family. Agreed to remove vehicles, restrain animals, stated that 2 children are in counseling, daughter in court system (CHINS). 8/16/93 Neighbor complaint via phone call. 9/20/94 Neighbor complaint (75 Tanbark Rd.) 9/27/93 Neighbor Complaint. 10/5/93 Informal Conference -Rent Arrearage. 10/20/93 BHA Annual Inspection of 95 Tanbark Road. 10/21/93 Neighbors at_#23u&_#.86 into BHA_ Office to:discuss complaints. 10/23/93 f Neighbor #67 - written complaint received^by BHA. -- _ 11/1/93 Scheduled Informal Conference with tenant She did not attend and no attempt made to reschedule appointment. 11/1/93 Assistant Executive Director phoned Bortolotti Construction concerning their company truck being parked overnight at house. 11/2/93 Letter sent to tenant by BHA Assistant Exec. Director about tenant not attending Informal Conference, outlining complaints against family, and giving tenant 5 days to respond. 12/3/93 Neighborhood Petition against family and copies of police logs referencing the property received by BHA. Case turned over to BHA Attorney for eviction. 1/13/94 Notice of Private Conference sent to,tenant by BHA Attorney. 1/27/94 Private Conference Scheduled - Tenant did not show up & no attempt made to reschedule. 1/28/94 30 Day Notice to Quit sent to Sheriff for Service. 1/31/94 Notice to Quit handed to tenant by Sheriff. 3/01/94 Tenant Still in Unit. 3/02/94 Summons and Complaint to Sheriff for Service. 3/16/94 Assault incident at 95 Tanbark Rd. between tenant's boyfriend, Neighbor and 14 year old son of tenant. 4/07/94 Scheduled Court Date for Summary Process. Barnstable 0A"y"ARLE.. Telephone(508)771-7222 MA . � Housing Aut6ority 146 South Street• Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 July 26, 1994 Stuart Schulman 96 Tanbark Road Marstons Mills, MA 02648 Dear Mr. Schulman: Last month Councilor Gobeil contacted me regarding certain issues at Tanbark Road. Some of these concerns related to the Barnstable Housing Authority's handling of the 95 Tanbark Road matter. Some of the issues Mr. Gobeil raised with me we had already discussed with you, however, I will repeat the position of the. BHA. Fair Housing laws prohibit housing authorities from allowing subjective selection of families for Chapter 705 housing. Individual citizens would not be permitted to participate in,or pass judgment on, the.worthiness of particular families for .placement in public housing. The BHA is renovating the property at this time and will be certain the-property meets health and safety codes. It is not the practice of the BHA to have-individuals inspect properties. Regarding the cost of the renovation, from your attendance at our Board meetings you are aware that we share information openly on bills and expenses. The Board has voted to allow the neighbors to do clean-up work at the vacant lot on the comer of Tanbark Road and Moss Place. After we finish renovations at 95 Tanbark and barring any additional vacancies, we will be clearing brush from the lot, if necessary. Finally, 1 was surprised to hear that you felt the BHA was not listening to your concerns. I believe the Board and staff have-addressed your concerns and answered your questions. We may differ on how matters should be handled, but I did not believe that communication was a problem. In fact, during the correspondence section of our last Board meeting I relayed Mr. Gobeil's issues and Chairman Burlingame offered to speak with you personally on these matters. His home number is 420-1229. Sincerely, Thomas K. Lynch Executive Director Equal Housing Opportunity Agency IHE " Barnstable BARN\TABLE. : L Telephone(508)771-7222 MA,S. 0/ Housing Authority lOrlty 146 South Street• Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 9� �07W �0 CEO M9.s. September 21, 1994 Dear Tanbark Road Area Resident: I am writing to you on behalf of the Board of Commissioners-of the Barnstable Housing Authority and in response to the letter we received from area residents dated August 10, 1994. In addition, I would like to respond to additional issues which were raised at a meeting conducted jointly by Town Councilor Len .Gobiel and myself at the Marstons Mills East Elementary School on Thursday, August 25, 1994. I was initially going to attempt to respond to the letter we received point by point. However, I am concerned that such a response would cause greater,discord between residents and the B.H.A., and that is not my goal in preparing this correspondence. Instead; I would prefer to respond to what I perceive to be the key issues and,provide you with as much information as possible related to these issues. In the way of an introduction, let me state for the record that the BHA Board of Commissioners is interested in working with our tenants and area residents so as to insure a safe and peaceful neighborhood for everyone. Our Board was concerned several months ago when representatives from your neighborhood came to one of our Board meetings regarding several incidents with one of our tenants. After this meeting the BHA continued actions it had previously initiated against the tenant in question, and moved as swiftly as possible through the courts to bring closure to what I know was a very unpleasant situation for all concerned. The incidents in your neighborhood raised several issues which concerned our Board members. Since these incidents, the BHA has made several changes to our policies and procedures in an effort to minimize the likelihood of future incidents of a similar nature. I would like to highlight some of these changes for you: 1. The BHA has adopted a troubled tenant policy which triggers an increased level of unit inspections and closer monitoring of a housing unit after the BHA has received neighbor complaints; 2. The BHA has worked out a system with the Barnstable Police to. regularly obtain incident activity reports associated with all BHA owned properties so as to give us insight as to any problems before they get out of hand. Equal Housing Opportunity Agency Tanbark Road Area Residents September 21, 1994 Page 2 3. The BHA is working to incorporate Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) checks into our tenant qualification process so as to utilize one additional information source in screening possible housing tenants; and 4. The=BH_� A is-working=with-Representative.Klimm-to~see1f-a-State wide register can-be-establishedrof tenan s who.leave.public,housing in-'`Badp-Standing%. (This registertiwould prevent_a problem tenant from leaving:one'housing authority. only to-t5e-Koused_with_another authority�elsewhere:in Massachusetts:,..- Although it is never possible to say "never", we hope these new policies and procedures will help the BHA detect serious tenant problems in the future, and should allow us to take corrective actions sooner than was previously possible. I was concerned to find that residents felt they had been rebuffed when they attempted to obtain information about the Housing Authority and its workings. .Let me assure you the BHA takes requests for.information seriously, and I will take it as my personal f responsibility,to insure future requests for.information are responded to promptly. As you may know there is some information which the BHA cannot disclose due to confidentiality protections afforded our clients. In an.effort to respond to many of the , issues articulated in the Fetter we received'and further issues from the Marstons Mills Elementary meeting, I have enclosed the following attachments to this letter in response to your requests: - 1. A copy of the Tenant Selection Guidelines we are required to follow. 2. A copy of the form Lease which is executed between the BHA and our clients. 3. The detail of repair costs associated with 95 Tanbark Road. (Please note it is the BHA's policy to pursue all available means to reclaim repair costs from any tenant who causes damages to our property. In the case of 95 Tanbark Road, the BHA is seeking court action to reclaim the costs detailed in this attachment.) 4. A copy of the Job Description for the Executive Director of the BHA. Finally, I would like to address the issue of the vacant lot in the development. The BHA has recently cleared debris from the vacant lot as agreed by Councilor Gobeil and myself at the Marstons Mills East meeting, and the BHA will be completing some additional chipping and cleaning in the weeks to come. Although this is a good short term solution to this issue, the BHA will attempt to develop a long range strategy as to how we will handle future maintenance issues associated with this property. We would welcome any thoughts neighbors might have as to how this lot could be utilized by Tanbark Road Area Residents allowing us to at the same time be consistent September 21, 1994 Page 3 in the future with deed recordings associated with this property and the development In closing, I would like to make a few comments oriented toward promoting better communications between the BHA and neighborhood residents. Direct, candid, polite communications can go a long way to promoting a good relationship. In prior meetings and communications with specific Tanbark Road residents, I have offered my home and office telephone numbers to be used if there are problems dealing directly with the staff at the BHA. As a volunteer, non-compensated, elected official, I would prefer residents attempt to work directly with the BHA staff on routine issues. If however, at any time, a resident does not feel they are being treated properly, or is dissatisfied with a response from our agency, I would encourage communication directly with myself or any of the BHA Board Members. Like you, we are residents of Barnstable and are concerned about our community, and the public housing services which are provided within it. Due to the history of issues in the Tanbark Road,Area, I have asked Sandra Perry, our Assistant Executive Dieector, to act as'a contact point Jor residents,who wish to voice concerns to the Housing Authority. I am asking Sandee to,separately track issues: raised by Tanbark Road residents and to be in'touch.with.me on.aweekly basis to discuss any matters which have come up during the week. . Pleaser feel free to contact Sandee at 771-7222 if you have concerns, or desire.additional information about BHA operations. If you are dissatisfied with any response you.receive from the agency, or would like to speak with me directly, please feel free to contact me in Cotuit at 420- 1229. I hope this letter provides you with useful information, and I hope we can work to promote a more positive and productive relationship with area residents for the future. I would also like to thank Town Councilor Len Gobiel for his assistance in responding to the concerns of area residents. His input and assistance is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Craig D. Burlingame, Chairman cc: Len Gobeil, Councilor John Klimm, State Representative Warren Rutherford, Town Manager TOTAL FRONTAGE THIS STREET 782 TOTAL 'PARCELS THIS STREET 6 `. ROAD INDEX! 1689• TYPE: 'Pv DESC: S.E. OFF RUTH STREET IN WEST HTANNISPORT . - PRIM NAP: 268. • CONNENT: f TANBARK ROAD - 1690 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ROAD INDEX g SjEEpp�� --PAGE 1 • - R O-A D-CIS-T-I•N G-.-8 r-N A M E_-'A S-0 F--1"0/ 8/9 8' -- ---- "-- ---"- -- - --'- i& HOUSE SEC: SEC VILL NUMBER MAP & PARCEL DEVEL LOT OWNER ACRES FRNTG IDX SECONDARY ROAD FRNTG CD PCA 0 100 016.003 126 BARNSTABLE HOUSING AUTHOR'Y .25 0 03 908 ' 9 099 057. 106 WHITE. MICHAEL R & KIMBERLY .39 147 0216 CAMMETT ROAD " 163 03 101 10 100 019.001 149 LC295 HEGARTY. RICHARD E & .36 0 03 101 22 100 019.002 148 MURRAYv JOHN C .33 0 03 101 23 099 056 107 HUBBARD, LYNNE E 27 141 03 35 1000 020.001 ' 147 ALBURYv WILLIE L .37 0 03 101 3 055. 108 BARNSTABLE HOUSING AUTHOR Y .50 122 03 908 38 100 025. 35 DACEYi WILLIAM E III TRS .75 335 03 130 :s 41 099 053.002 109 SCHIFFER.- HERBERT P & HEIDI .48 0 03 101 42 100 020.002 146 GENDRONv EDWIN V & MARY L •26 0 03 101 is i 47 099 053. 001 110 SORDILLOv JOHN & ANTOINETTE .27 0 03 101 13I 60 100 020.003 1451C29.5 OGILV•IEv MICHAEL C & LISA M .24 0 003 3 101 i9 64 100 027. 37 DACEYv 'WILLIAM E III TRS .45 125 03 101 15 :id A'g8- 10 21 -144 STANLEY RICHARD J .23 0 7 . STA NLEY• PETER M& ELI Z ABETH .24 80 03 101 zo 75 1_00 031,0o1 114 DIGGS. . KIP Al CARMEN D .23 0 03 101 zl 1 76 10�2-2.DO1 143 LC295 BRADYv KAREN L .24 0 03 101 221 z 79 100 024. 139- WATSON,, WALLACE A & .24 204 1042 MOSS PLACE 200 03 101 23 : 1,4 85 100 030. 115 LC295 CARUSOv ROBERT A & RUTH W .23 85 03 101 24 i I,; 86 100 022.002 142 - DOOLEYv MICHAEL L & •CAROL A .24 0 03 101 25 � 90 130 029. 39 DACEY ' WILLIAM E III TRS .45 125 03 130 40 12 93 100 023. 33 DAC EY. " WILLI AM E III TRS .51 140 03 130 zb I its' 002 116 BARNSTABLE HOUSING AUTHOR'Y " 23 0 iz: 95 100 029- 03 908 zs 96 100 023.001 141 LC295 SCHULMANv STUART D & .24 0 03 101 23 3.1 103 130 929.001 117 EASTER'BROOKSP RICHARD 8 .23 0 03 101 33! ,: 104 100 023.002 140 L.0 295 MARRY, PAUL J- - -- .23 0 03 101 107 100 022. 32 DACEY. WILLIAM E III TRS .51 140 03 130 32 � 13 111 100 028. 118 SULLIVANP JEFFREY E & .23 85 03 101 33I 114 100 031 . 41 DACEY• WILLIAM E III TRS 45 125 �3d 121 100 027.002 119 BURKEv TIMOTHY J .23 0 03 101 3.: �i3_ 03 1D1 .. ' I._ 126 100 032. 1 2 BARNSTABLE HOUSING AUTHOR' Y .23 ' ' 125 03 908 3; 37: 133 100 020. DAC EY. WILLIAM E 11.1 TRS .51 140 03 908 f 137 136 130 016.002 25 BARNSTABLE HOUSING AUTHOR 'Y .27 0 03 130 37 �;33 1 37 100 025. 121 PUNDIK• OLEG $ ANNA .23 - 125 03 101 35 140 138 099 054. 111 CABELL. RONALD A .25 125 03 101 401 �4 145 130 025.002 122 SCHLEGEL. FRANK J & .26 0 03 101 41I '1 v 148 100 016.001 124 GUILFOYLE JANE M 36 0 I 03 101 42 � I4s. 153. 100 025.001 123 LC295_ GUT£RMUTHv MICHAEL C 8 .67 0 !44,1 - PRIMARY ROAD 43 ------------------------------ SECONDARY.. PARCELS ------------ ------ - 5J ii45_ 13 100 041 . ZAKARIANv DOTTIE .68 155 1529 STARLIGHT DRIVE 204 03 101 4., 143 2 100 016. A> DACEYv* WILLIAM E III TRS .65 234 1042 MOS-S PLACE 94 03 130 i i4V 0 100 004-. - WERNER• �� CONCETTA 3.00 316 1147 OLD FALMOUTH ROAD 710 03 130 43I J3 177 099 053•0 44 . DACEY. WILLIAM E III TRS :47 131' 1529 STARLIGHT DRIVE 154 03 130 451 3 5. 53 53 54 I.c 55 p 57 1 o 1 53 160 TOTAL FRONTAGE THIS STREET - 3.205 TOTAL PARCELS THIS STREET " - 38 f0I i6� .. _ .._ .�._.V.__-_._ ... 61 3163 : ROAD INDEX: 1690.. TYPE. P• DESC: SE OFF CAMMETT RD- PRIM NAP: 099� COMAEMTt " * 62 63 �_-- .•-- - 6J i L ' I` TOTAL FRONTAGE THIS STREET - 342 TOTAL PARCELS THIS STREET:: -. 2 " ROAD INDEX: 1041 • TYPE: P. DESC: Off HARBOR RD . PRIM. MAP:: .30.6m ° COMMENT.r - ---------------- MOSS PLACE - 1042 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ROAD INDEX SYSTEM ---___ _ _- _-_- PAGE_ _ _ 1 r: - ---------- -R 0 A D-L-i-S T I N G B Y N A M E�A S_0 F-1'0/28I 9$�____ _.__ - _ --•-__--�. SEC SEC VILL HOUSE FRNTG COPCA NUMBER - NUMBER MAP & PARCEL DEVEL LOT OWNER ACRES FRNTG IDX SECONDARY ROAD 2 100 016� CM> -DACEY WILLIAM E III TRS .6.5 94 1690 TANBARK ROAD 234 03 1003 1 5 100 018:002 Tn HERSEY• NEIL 0 .23 0 12 100 015;003 1 3 fORGIONE. LISA A .23 D 03 13 DACEY. WILLIAM E III TRS .S2 130 03 130 17 100 019.0..03 4 FAG ANS• KEVIN W & TAMI M .31 0 03 101 03 101 20 100 018.001 131 DEBARROS. PETER R & .27 0 03 101 2.3 190 019.004 135 ANGLIN. JAMES M & JANE M .37 0 29 100 p17.001 136 BARNSTABLE HOUSING AUTHOR• Y .45 134 03 101 ;3 34 100 813. . 13 C FER GUSO N. KEVIN JOHN & 03 1 01 i.+ 35 100 017.002 1 7 DIETRICK-p JOSEPH J & AMY F 25 0 . 03 1.01 3: DAC EY. WILLIAM E III TRS .64 263 03 130 to 46 100 014. 129 DACEY• WILLIAM E III TRS .37 130 03 101 ,$ 03 101 49 130 017.003 138 ZULKIEWICZ. JANE M .24 040 52 100 015.001 128 DEYOUNG. PHILLIP G 8 .34 0 03 101 60 100 015.002 127 LC295 ANTOSCA. JOSEPH A & LINDA M .48 0 03 101 2a! 2, 1 ------ ------ SECONDARY ' PARCELS PRIMARY ROAD --- �; ; .24 200 1690 TANBARK ROAD 204 03 101 24i• 79 100 024. 13 WATSON. WALLACE A & 76 1']0 01 8.. DAC EY. WILLIAM E III TRS .69 158 0216 CAMMETT ROAD 156 03 130 25 i 17. 176 079 018. 2 LC295 BROWN. MICHAEL W & DOREEN .52 49 0216 CAMMETT ROAD 212 03 101 2. 19 LC2950 NORMAN• KINGS & .51 161. U216 CAMMETT - ROAD 154 03 101 ;i. 23 33 I '3'' 34 3.3 3: 1 .3 ,4) 4) ! �42 4v 45 4 ', ,3 t 53— � I55 58 59 G" 4mm w. SHEET 7 OF 7 ` S MILLS LOT 130 Sam! cp ri LOT 129 LOCATION MAP s~Orlo OT� k�? �- , LOT 12t .9 I LOT 31 ` p sciw! �•' no! — 'A'o!R�1 1 LOT 137 i �< 1 i I 4 i 1yA '4 ♦ K1,•! ��, a ii LOT 124� ` IA• `Kd / LOT 106 LOT 126 "25•- LOT 123 4) y /' /1. I C 74° �tr 1 l_ >4• a,!? < 'kh LOT 13 / \\ LOT 149 *' I \lam \\ IL71111! ^ Q LOT 136 1 pSpd / \\\ 21 LOT 134 ii1 �� /�' / S LOT 122 `�I 4 ie• I&M! LM1q! '' h -A r Ab. �'/ L T 121 `tpd.1 1 \ r.S LOT 107 f LOT 14a! 00 \\ 14. ! e l *,5 > $40' Y �; < q, � t/s t°• 01 0 a1.ao• RIOT 14712 •,� � y �1 '� � '� iuv':. c , g ~ '• '6.9 wl,INSY, ou ,\/, \ LOT 119 r LOT 141 \ '�\� t, 17� .L Sam! < 1!•.S r. °ua° Y < LOT�t411LOT }&I \ "m Sir moo► r IL LOT 120 T. A � LOT 117 � Ai tAw Sirs er ,. ; •� 1 0 LOST 43\ / ,, �, 7S A~ � '� � \ mil' R� 1�1 � < '11•e l� 'LOT 144' P Y \ �,.,' Nms ���''�' Lai!°Wd �'' a >R� : l� � 1.�! !HEFT 7A oF'1 "& SO/t� Lp" A.Ab 6 v ,• \i 1 LOT 115 4a r �... —1�a\.11.11W1 War. gesoLors.. �� ►off L'Of 145 11. 1�I LOT 146 �6� �I,aeo! a - , t.iaf M�QT ,I03"! ' Qt < ,,�,0 a 7A 0I 7 1V1e_ •{.1�61Mp' � - LO>• toe � IIM7Q►' e� �\ i r LOT 116 LOT 113 1� Im4! \�' ,' as. %�- ° '• six\4 xmo>M � LOT i,e 111 \ „\�`L\0ll�114 i'' I� b� r ° < 1tip i . •' . Isle •6 .D.r e.4 f taro I 1:1 3 11 29 ee I FINAL BLDG. AND SEPTIC LOCATIONS PA 1 10 12 ee 1 INITIAL ELK NO. DATE I DESCRI t eY \\\ •.N,s 1 1 BUn DING LOCATION PLAN MARSTONS MILLS WOODLANDS LOT 109 +°«'� I BARNSTABLE, MASS CHUSETTS I OODLANDS ASSOCIATES Uscll \ 50' JOB NO 13313 \ SCALE: 1` .� •,,.. 00 o b no •^�I\1) .a o/..7. 1 , 1JL1161Aib UGM M ==t Nr. i eeB TEST 1uu+ 1rSaEr CENTERV= lu OEM w a racer 0aN r loomloomAm ruw 63 a - t u� mom ® DESM CALD"110kS:� � ® ��rl�R1MT .,v ra rt r s•nr rrg "I'L s" Rw 1At:AI M WW �� r<m�T rw rt ,�"rx �U& sKie mAY x_wL 9L) .�3LSyA�1LL JUAT vs �� r LAW V wm or t�Oc WAK 3�GL mpmmmm ILK thou.aA /Lf 110rM AKA or./ar. uma asnbsutlON • ""` sox 6 kotEs: ® 1. Au AM"Alumna 94UL a"va"to as." MU r AM tK"M Or nr r WAn NO o nRAo at e r 1W t� WAa asoaa Or umac t000 QA11011 S[TTC TAW r 1 r 1 r 1 1. .0 eras/0 SAMM7 IMn OWL K momen A . wow 1r a r0rs0 WoAc SEPTIC SYSTEM PROFIT F � 'r I • i ����oaten w arc l ALL oW/•rsn S 1K frown TOMNI MYL K 01110014 .w w urt M o11 Cr TEST k01 E ar Minvoilliiio w-n Lamm Ram tw•rt 10os a 11101111 r rT.W wwvo a nMw"o rrA: W-s LOOM lEACHM►IT MILL W IO>a R*OT On tM to rt or awe an S. Ntwtsrtr NO VBnC 1 mrwoc=1ivr.aaAK LOT ELEVATIONS LEGM: NO. y Y Put trot amt im m ELEV. 106 �07108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 low Tom swr0 51Ot a OCATI i ( r�wr ua.n rn 0 O.FOUND r�10"Im yr of A 76•S 7t.s 71.0 i.0 7bo 110 t•01 sl.e Lf 7f.S 7L0 71.r 7f.9 00.9 4..s a.s *L• sl0 tl.! p. - o1.o q,r -0 IIA+ 74,5 7f,6 lire 74.• �K laotto rn l 74.f 74.T '1- '7>r0 77.0 7s.o 7i.3 •*,f 70.0 14..0 11.0 �A 71,3 74. low A ro sm at vm Nal B 7b•s �tS �+0 (.41 itJ M.o t1J� 7t6 h•e 7f.o 730 74•f 7�•0 7ts r.s rs 1►4 >•.I -N� 7s.f - 70.0 7M 7$G f 71.1. 71.1 76L 7Qf .0.6 7t.e 7601 t•1 7f.5 741 70A 7t.1 -N,4 7&4 Y1.4 66,5 MS 6.4.o 74o B C 7b•7 s tf.T t!•s bAo FZ7 y1t 7Li 1L1 7t.1 71,7 74.i If.7 1t•t 77 77•t 7r. 77•• 77' 7►.L - 77.7 777 7f.1 71 -1t3 It(r 71.3 70.E }.t 11.7 7>t '74.4 7f.t 4 T1•(. 1t.b 71.1 -11. H4 K &ft' 5o'T M•7 C D 70.0 H•e bs•9 ail ff.fr ti.f i1.' 7t0 . h.S 7sd 72.f 74.0 70.s 7a0 .0 77,0 7r.0 vs of 77 4 7s,o - 77.3 77:f 7f,i o 71.1 4i.* W 70.0 10.0 7tf D 71y0 fi•4 1s.• 744 75.4 7t4 7►4 7e. N•1 t ev 0.0 1,64 7A3 E Lit► ef•t ts•'J i&A kq iti t*% ho I�71.3 72-f 79.3 7i.s T1.3 Ifs 7c.s r s 7!1 7,r.s ?%5 7r.� - �1> 77.b 1 7 D. 7►fl /s•f *.1 k1•� H• lt4 ►t.• 7t, s4. 74.5 7i.b 7t.i f1•e • H.f K.b i4.1 H•) h 3 E F ear too 6,0.1 t1)•t eat its to.61 70.6!rM.1 7t.1 7s.1. 7f.1 WA, 7t.1. 7t.4, 11-1 77.1 77.1 7Le - 77.1 7Z1 74 A. 7i a 7r•7 7D.1 f 1.6 4" 76t. 7L.1, 7t1.1 74.1 744 . 71•I tI 70.e KA, MAr L1.1 7r� F G t '',no 7.3 7z5 77.0 7 .0 7i.S - 7 77,0 r.o h•t . 145 7407t0f . ni. 1 71•f 70 `6, Hi G H if f `!5 f1.0 51.0 s1 a ace lot-91, 649 tso ".o {to 67.5 e10 e1•5 70.6 70.5 71.6 7<•0 7.o H•s - 71.0 71.0 os.s 1.7•f rA•f K.e elf ears el,s K.0 e4.3 tSo t►.f N.o 7o tw.tr is.i 14.5 (ri.f 546 -%•f I KA e4o H APPROVED: BOARD OF HEALTH J f4f f►s is•o ft+ �o>f7•o st►f boa �ilo tiro tt.. elf es.• If.6 tt.0 esf t73 tlo e710 t49 _ t7t K•5 LI.s t1.S M.f se.• IrO.f 61.s f1•s �l•o ti.f ►ire e4S t4.9 es• el.o etS fors Sff 41.6 I.o o tore K M1 7K0 7r.0 ta0 µ• 7r,o 71.1 71.3 Ti 6 7hf 7f.1 74•O 77.f If 746 7}f 00.0 emp 6e0 71.5 640 art• .f 7i.; 7s.0 74•s 7G.v 7S.o ►) K Mi r!r T 7s•6 J1i.0 7i. 71►s 77.0 7f.b 74t 1M3 7i l• 61.0 7r•f 7t•r a't•0 iL 78.6 71•s taro t►• $0.3I64•0 •11l ?&*I I&S f" 71.0 70.9 720 70.f .71.o "-a 746 79.0 7s.6 71.0 - 71.5 71.0 •R,.• 7s.5 -mf 7H 7t.$ Ise 71A.9 74.7 0 7110 Tao 7f.S 711f -P4* 7t.e Ii.ek&sko 10.0 Its 77S L to 7S.o h,o t7f K.s N.0 M.t 7A►q .91 Tr.o 7r.f 7+s 7r<o 7as 7xs ss� 7Fo "", 71.6 7f-q 720 - 7s9 77.0 7 71.0 7!t ,0 7sS lt.f . 0 743 1 o s t 'M4 74.4 7t,o 711, e4•S Ito 13.5 ?�C73 CIO } N 7t.e 71.0 tx0 tii N! Mo 7ttA 711.1 1 MS 7tRI 7>1.1♦ ' �' 7r.o; 74L4`?N �• 77a4 7tl.f 77:e1 '11.e 7i a IM.O 74•! 7Z.f 7No fart 74f 1f.D 1!,f '7f•o 14! 1i 0 7i.0 7Me /s 0 e4.0 7�.5 1f.S N .. - '..i -'•ay .mac r�.. y. 1 12 HTIAL ISSUE AL s later s _ N0. DATE DESCRIPhON # roec ZEST s SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN ec tD7S" MARSTONS MII.LS�WOODLANDS_ ..,arlw• _ ,•••.ate ,, stow - s . -t- HARNST_ARM-,MASS :1100DLANDS;ASSOCIATESARBAI.17 Ion .t`' n " �SCAIF`l r v40 JOB s NQ 1J38z�s0o F r � r s Ow SHEET 7 OF 7 I tsae � I MARSTONS MILLS i LOT 130 usa w _ 1saw. LOCATION MAP f oil �����O/A s•� ta s '~X `` a,?�. ,,,s• .is 1, \ LOT 31 LOT 137 A 4 ! 10.71114 r lot 8 LOT 106 '' I 1 • ♦ yl� \`� `Y ` 9 `�1 ` LOT 123` \ LOT 126 01111114111 w y �`` I i J.)L_ �40 ` T�.6 `i I �' LOT 13 yi eta \ i , '�'' yp �� w \ -pow s \ LOT 149lip / \\ lawn t► - ~Y i a LOT 136 I pyd 140 LOT 134 ��' A \ + t LOT 122 135 , '�s \� v�LOT 121 nd � \\� LOT 107 + LOT 146 1!• ' �\\ r Y. \ a T^ \ 1t�w� i� a •I `) / .. 6 > ' � �\�'p \ �• °5 R \ tepl tat " (sae�r hl� aIOT 147 .. % �1\ LOT 119 oyd ���A'LOT�1a1 \\ ';\� �s� �1A`>�1aso ff \ o +b . \ri TA .I 1 11. (� • •ly. 'LOIN i 'lpso `R LOT 120 i \\ limas \� LOT 117 s ar 1 0 Y.y f li "kp N LOT A 43\\ '' .\ s�yi laaa s �o Il 4 a I I • �, ,iieo A a '.lo tit ' loalircIr .ea �' otes i bile s>+ ��''�' a � �.' pr. I.fit. '..dlCl;T TA Or-'? "K- Sat- v�.s ANe - / 9 LOT 11s se' : �� 7 7sRivWMw4 -Mwr 99"LoTs.. n ig1 tis �1 \ + >jt S.$00 srvoG T- 7A or 7 tot- •LAI&WNW. `e 1 st LOT 141i 'fosn e► �` "�toso s f w,o i I LOT 106 • �' Heap►' � yt li 1 LOT 116 '� v� �► v. 1 LOT 11i �� A. ♦a loco I11 � I +1.9 I k LOT 111 to"w tom•, : �{� �tLO 114 16 t0.e0e sR ��x . .a f d 14 a► --Isle es .0.10.4w e.1 tbkb E. tat.Ano►tu ' 18 r Ir J$A I I 1 - • 3 11 29 88 FINAL BLDG. AND SEPTIC LOCATIONS PAL 11.0 `� ..,. BUILDINGOCATION ELM DON — 1 10 12 88 INITIAL IS ELK NO.I DATE DESCRIPTI BY BUILDING LOCATION PLAN I.1 MARSTONS MILLS WOODLANDS \ LOT 109 °:•"w I BARNSTABLE, MASS CHUSETTS \\ .. WOODLANDS ASSOCIATES ustr \\ SCALE: 1" = 50' JOB NO. 1338 00 0 0o no LM M=1 11PsN0 MOCUTt INC. i oId® u1m m Raw us ueiae Beg TMEST cz3rTj2ty= Ju ozeax