Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0022 BURNING TREE LANE
i. Ro 1 ���1^ry�/nn/ ��atvctFa�o UPC 12543 No. 53LOR H O.RTI V,!o bPd Anderson, Robin From: Logan, Erin Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2018 3:25 PM To: Florence, Brian Cc: Anderson, Robin Subject: Greenhouse, 22 Burning Tree, West Barnstable Good afternoon,Brian, Due to a lack of quorum, the August 811,Old Kings Highway agenda will be continued to the August 29th hearing.This includes the application for the greenhouse at 22 Burning Tree Lane,West Barnstable.I have notified the Waluck's (applicant)as well as Joe Gill(the abutter).I will provide an update on August 30th. In the meantime,please do not hesitate to call or email with any questions. Best Regards, Erin K. Logan Erin K. Logan Administrative Assistant Town of Barnstable Planning&Development Department Old King's Highway Historic District Committee Barnstable Historical Commission 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 Phone 508.862.4787 erin.logan@town.barnstable.ma.us 1 Anderson, Robin 6ar)I.d From: Florence, Brian Sent: Monday, July 09, 2018 12:08 PM To: 'Joe' Cc: Anderson, Robin; Logan, Erin Subject: 22 Burning Tree Greenhouse Dear Mr. Gill, Ms.Anderson has entered your concerns regarding your neighbors greenhouse into our code compliance system. Please be advised that the neighbor has been notified that they must seek approval from the Old Kings Highway Regional Historic District Committee for that structure and are in the process of doing so. We will await their decision and/or proceed with enforcement action after 30 days if they fail to diligently pursue an approval. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. i Regards, Brian Florence, Building Commissioner Building Department I Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4038 Brian.forence@town.barnstable.ma.us i 1 E Ap RL V -L jell 0 'r ` ► �ii` o Nor ._ .K, M� i U �� ��r� n� as �t� Anderson, Robin From: Logan, Erin Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 11:37 AM To: Anderson, Robin Subject: 22 Burning Tree Lane, West Barnstable, Map 136, Parcel 025 Good morning,Robin, Kindly see below complaint/inquiry and please let me know if you need additional information. Date of Inquiry: May 23,2018 Inquirer: Anonymous Property Owner: Bruce&Susan Waluck Address of inquiry: 22 Burning Tree Lane,West Barnstable Map &Parcel: 136/025 Inquiry:Construction of a hot house in the rear of the property OKH Status: The homeowner does not have OKH approval for this project Thank you! Best Regards, Erin K Logan Erin K. Logan Administrative Assistant Town of Barnstable Planning&Development Department Old King's Highway Historic District Committee Barnstable Historical Commission 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 Phone 508.862.4787 erin.logan@town.barnstable.ma.us 1 Anderson, Robin From: Florence, Brian Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 9:29 AM To: Logan, Erin; 'Joe'; Scali, Richard Cc: Anderson, Robin Subject: RE: OKH hearing May 23 Waluck 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Mr. Gill, My recollection is that your neighbor is on a slight hill. I could not confirm at the time that surface water travelled far enough to reach your property from the neighbor's house and driveway. You may recall that my inspection was conducted during a significant rain event. To be clear,the Building Department's role and responsibility during construction is to ascertain whether or not the construction of the house caused more run-off and/or erosion than what existed prior to construction. I determined that was not the case because roof run-off from the neighbor's building drains into a proper drainage system (gutters, downspouts and subsurface drywells). That is why I closed your request for enforcement. The building department does not regulate driveways and thus cannot require specific materials to be used. However, it would seem to me that a driveway,which would direct the water downhill and onto the roadway would have the opposite effect of sending water onto your property and would help limit any water from going onto your property. With that said, I am not a hydrologist or a civil engineer and am not qualified to confirm or deny for certain why you have surface water accumulating on your property. I would recommend that you engage the services of a civil engineer to perform an evaluation and analysis of the cause and effect of surface water on your property. If you find out in fact that the neighbor's house drainage system has failed and that more water than what existed prior to construction is entering upon your property then we can assist you with a building code enforcement action. However, if you find that surface water from your neighbor unrelated to the building is affecting your property then you have a civil matter that can only be resolved through a civil action in court, in which case I recommend that you contact an attorney. At this point the case involving water run-off from your neighbor's building remains closed. I hope that this information .has been helpful: If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. Regards, Brian Florence, Building Commissioner Building Department I Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4038 Brian.forence@town.barnstable.ma.us From: Logan, Erin Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 10:11 AM To: 'Joe'; Scali, Richard Cc: Florence, Brian Subject: RE: OKH hearing May 23 Waluck 22 Burning Tree Lane Good morning,Joe, 1 Thank you for your feedback regarding the proposed paving project at 22 Burning Tree Lane.I have forwarded same to the OKH Committee and your email will become part of the file. As always,please let me know if you have any questions. Best Regards, Erin K. Logan I Erin K. Logan Administrative Assistant Town of Barnstable Planning& Development Department Old King's Highway Historic District Committee Barnstable Historical Commission 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 Phone 508.862.4787 erin.logan@town.barnstable.n-ia.us From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 2:15 PM To: Logan, Erin; Scali, Richard Cc: Florence, Brian Subject: OKH hearing May 23 Waluck 22 Burning Tree Lane Erin: Please confirm you have received this email and please pass this email to the OKH members for the March 23 meeting—thank you. We are writing to object to the proposed paving of the Waluck driveway at 22 Burning Tree Lane — a property that we abut. All 9 properties that surround 22 Burning Tree have stone or grass driveways — paving would be inconsistent and inappropriate with the current look of the area. Within our Point Hill neighborhood there are a few paved driveways but all are located about a half mile away and have steep slopes where stone would not be workable. We strongly urge the Commission to require a stone driveway for this property. Sincerely, Joe and Nancy Gill 42 Burning Tree Lane West Barnstable MA 02668 PS to Mr Florence As you know there is a history of runoff from 22 Burning Tree onto our property and last year to collect the runoff in the rear of the property the Walucks installed a large swale and dry well. if the driveway is paved it will increase the runoff to the rear yard swale (possibly. 2 overloading it) and more runoff will flow to the front yard where there is no provision for surface runoff. This is another reason a stone driveway should be required. i 3 r,. _ _._ _ __. , i t ��� ���- R� i �� �- � � s ��� Joseph Gill From`. Bruce Waluck[brucewaluck@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:35 PM To: Joseph Gill Subject: Re: landscaping Hi Joe, We fully understand your concern of the long term effects as a result of the house going in. I want you to feel confident and know that I plan on doing whatever it takes to control the run-off. There are a number of ways we can do that and dry wells are definitely included. The newly paved road should have a curbed edge to direct rain water towards the drain and we should ask for it. We intend to remove material but at this point it is too soon to tell how much, we still have to dig the septic. Zoe lot slopes four feet across the front. We want to flatten that out and not build it up. It looks ugly w with all the piles and the rough foundation but everything will work out. Our plan is to pick up another silt fence and hay bales tomorrow, install on Saturday. Regards, Bruce From: Joseph Gill <ioseph-gill(a)_comcast.net> To: Bruce& Susan Waluck<brucewaluck(a-yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:03 AM Subject: landscaping Bruce: We talked about landscaping a few days ago and here is the info that I promised. When we renovated in 1998-99 we used Tom McCarthy of Shamrock Landscaping, located in Sandwich, best way to reach Tom is his cell 508-509-8530. Tom designed and constructed most of what you see in our yard; the driveway, parking areas, plantings and drainage. Tom also has done our yard maintenance for many years — spring and fall clean up and lawn cutting, etc during the summer. He is reliable, has good people and is an excellent resource for planning and when questions come up. I .think you would really benefit by talking with him now, pick his brains and get a review of your plans. I recommend him highly. With.the clay soil we both have, drainage is really important otherwise runoff will get into window wells and the basement —we have a neighbor with a cracked foundation probably due to the recent heavy rains and poor drainage and settling. Bob Stolte had some water problems last year. When we renovated we set up'a system with all the josephgill From: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 11:31 AM To: josephgill@comcast.net Subject: Re:dry well HI Joe, The system I just installed will cost us over$2,000... in terms of the heavy machine needed,the stone,the chamber, and the cleanup, not to mention the time that I just don't have --but I am putting time into it for you. Not to mention the upcoming costs of the downspouts and the trenching needed to channel the water....another $4,000. We're been quoting that already. I will not debate the water storage design with you. It will not be 10 times larger. Are you kidding? Most of these calculations do not take into account that we have 22 tons of stone underneath. How many people do you know have a 3,906 gallon tank in their back yard? Bruce From: Joseph Gill <josephgill@comcast.net> To: Bruce& Susan Waluck<brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 7:45 AM Subject: dry well Bruce: We are glad to see you working at a dry well solution and appreciate your efforts. I googled ADS but could not find anything. Please send me their web site and show me how you did the calculation to arrive at the structure you placed yesterday that is about 300 gallons. I did find NDS Flo-Well and used their dry well calculator—for the rear half of the roof I plugged in 1,000 sq ft and a Coefficient of Runoff of 1.0 and for the back yard lawn I used 17,600 sq ft and a Coefficient of 0.35. I used 1.75 for the 25 year rainfall for our zone. The calculator results are 130 gallons per minute and it calls for a tank capacity of 3,906 gallons which is about 10 times larger than the tank you have. Thanks,Joe I Joe From: Daniel A.Ojala PE, PLS <downcape@downcape.com> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe' Subject: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Attachments: 14-350 DRAINAGE REPAIR 11x17 (1).pdf Joe: Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. The design if for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A.Ojala PE,PLS down cape engineering,inc. 939 Main St.Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. 1 N Y g•�, 5 c9 f�'9tF\ C MAP 136 026 ILL SIDENCE o SEPTI SYS o P/ E)OSTING DWELLING ( N MAP 1 6 02 DRIVE MAP # 0 # 2 \N ARE PLAN VIEW Scale:1"=40' $ 0 20 40 60 80 100 FEET \ Gy LEAVE OPEN SAND / \ moo", G FOR TEMPORARY FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN FRAME&GRATE CONSTRUCTION UNTIL SITE STABILIZED l' . . ...... \ F PERIOD POOLING REMOVE CONSTRUCTION SILTATION PRIOR l` �j/ ':.:.: :.\ 0 ZONE DEPTH PER TO FINAL PLANTING, PLACE SOD ON RETENTION AREA .\ S O 0� PLAN PRIOR TO REMOVING FILTER FABRIC \✓ :.:.� \ � LINE AND GRADE PER REMOVE CONSTRUCTION SILT AS REQUIRED ® O PLAN VIEW UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED. — PLACE DOUBLE LAYER OF FILTER ;•;�.. %Q\ �..... \ t�� FABRIC BETWEEN FRAME AND OO� �- GRATE UNTIL SITE STABLE t^ •� RLM EL 32-0 COARSE SAND COARSE SAND `.t, •,':j` 5 FILL Flu " Scale:1"=10* 10 SCALE DETAIL VIEW BASIN FILL~``.t':':"•i•' UNSUITABLE SOIL REMOVAL • TOP EL 27.0 REQUIRED "„. ..... ..... .. OVERALL SIZE 0 5 10 15 20 25 FEET ...._0..0.0 .. X 34• x7.5 " DRAINAGE SKETCH PLAN 6'-8'X 6'0 N oi LOCATED AT 1000 GAL AL � LEACHPTT 4'SCH40 PVC AT '�+ EaLAL ORIGINAL GLEAN SAND BELOW 22 BURNING TREE LANE 2x MIN. IN FROM 90'PER SOIL LOG TH2 REAR ROOF GRAINS o0000000o RED TO GLEAN SAND, WEST BARNSTABLE, MA REPLACE SILT LOAM WITH CLEAN COARSE SAND eseesee eves>e 3/4'— 1 1/2' PREPARED FOR DOUBLE WASHED STONE • 4' MIN.AROUND PIT JOSEPH GILL FOR #22 SITE SECTION VIEW N.T.S. DECEMBER 11, 2014 I off 508-362-4541 fox 508-362-9880 NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO ;downcope.com e LOCATE U11UTIES AND NOTIFY DIGSAFE, ADJUST GRADES TO down Hro a e� inae�M MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS, PREPARED BY: DANIEL A. OJALA, P.L.S., P.E. P 8i/At. MAINTAIN DESIGN SHAPE. Civil engineers REF. SITE PLAN BY ECO-TECH land surveyors REVISED AUG. 30, 2013 939 Moin Street ( Rte 6A) LICE #14-350 YARMOUTHPORT MA 02675 14-350 GILL.DWG I Joe From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 4:03 PM To: Thomas Perry(thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us) Cc: Phil Wallace; Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) Subject: FW:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Attachments: 14-350 22 Burning Tree Drywell Calcs.pdf, RATIONAL 14-350.pdf Tom: This is a second email from Dan 0jala with the design calculations. Dan's design has over 5,000 gallons of capacity; Mr Walluck has approximately 1,500 gallons. Also note that Dan calls for a second drywell for the front roof drains. Regards, Joe Gill From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 8:45 AM To: 'Joe' <josephgilI@comcast.net> Cc: 'Heather Vermette'<hvermette@downcape.com> Subject: RE:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Hi, Joe: The four feet of stone around the 1,000 gallon pit provides an additional 3,000 gallons for 3,920 gallons total storage. Storage volume above the rim in the bowl and in the voids in the sand is not included,that would add to the capacity. The trick is to keep the water going into this leaching system clear from silt. If kept clean, it will reliably infiltrate 224 gallons per minute into the ground, so the storage volume under these conditions is wholly adequate. I was thinking another drywell should be used for the front roof drain, I just did the calcs for the rear of the roof. Attached are drywell capacity and the rational drainage design utilized. Thanks, Daniel A.Ojala PE,PLS down cape engineering,inc. 939 Main St. Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com down cape engineering,inc. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS DATE:6-10-2014 DOWN CAPE ENGINEERING DRAINAGE AREA: DA1-REAR ROOF AND YARD DRAINING TO GILL SIDE DRAINAGE AREA COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS: AREA OF PAVEMENT/DRIVES/BUILDINGS: 2,200 SF 0.05 AC. AREA OF LAWNS AND WOODS: 13200 SF 0.30 AC. TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 15400 SF 0.35 AC. CURVE NUMBER PVT/BLDGS: 0.95 CURVE NUMBER LAWN/WOODS: 0.41 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER: 0.49 (PVT AREA*0.95+GRASS*0.41)/TOTAL AREA) RATIONAL METHOD DRAINAGE SIZING: Q=CIA, SF REQ=Q*448.8 GPM/CFS (1/0.6)GPM/SF DRAINAGE AREA: 15400 SF CURVE NUMBER: 0.49 RATIO RAINFALL INTENSITY: 3.5 IN./HR (SEE NOMOGRAPH) GPM/SF RATIO: 0.6 GPM/SF (<2MIN/IN PERC RATE) LEACHING AREA REQUIRED: 451 SF USE ONE 6X14 LEACHING CATCH BASINS WITH STORAGE OVER, SQUARE FOOTAGE 453 SF>443 SF O.K. down cape engineering 14-350 22 Burning Tree Drywell Calcs.xls HYDRO-CAD DRAINAGE ANALYSIS INFORMATION STAGE-DISCHARGE AND STAGE STORAGE TABLE DAl 6'DIA PRECAST LEACHING PITS, 6-8"HIGH 3/4" - 1-1/2" WASHED STONE FOR EFF.DIA SELECTED T DEEP LEACHING TRENCHES BETWEEN STRUCTURES IF REQ. INPUT VARIABLES: NUMBER OF LEACHPITS: 1 (NO.PITS) LENGTH OF TRENCHES: 0 (FT.) WIDTH OF TRENCHES: 0 (FT.) INVERT OF STRUCTURES: 25 (EL.ABOVE DATUM) EFFECTIVE DIAMETER PITS: 14 (STONE+LPIT O.A.DIA) STONE VOID RATIO,E: 0.4 (FT3/FT3) DESIGN LEACH RATE: 0.5 (GPM/SF) CALCULATED VALUES: TOP OF PRECAST STRUCTURES ELEV.: 27.00 BOTTOM LPIT.ELEV. 20.33 BOTTOM TRENCH.EL. 23.00 ELEVATION(FT) STORAGE(CUTT.) DISCHARGE(CFS) 20.23 0 0 20.33 0 0.17 21.00 52.6 0.19 22.00 131.2 0.25 22.93 204.2 0.30 23.00 209.7 0.30 24.00 288.2 0.35 25.00 366.8 0.40 26.00 445.3 0.45 27.00 523.8 (3,920 gal) 0.50 r Joe From: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 7:05 PM To: josephgill Subject: Re: Rain on April 7 Hi Joe, Welcome back from Florida. Thanks for the picture. Yes -- we're very aware that that drywell fills up... mostly during the very heaviest of rains. I'm going to add a berm of plantings uphill of the collection area. We'll take some bids this week and hope to get it installed soon before the grass growing season. I've had many health issues this winter and have not been able to get out there. And, although I can get around....I continue to have trouble with strenuous tasks. This weekend was the first time in awhile that I've been able to visit the house. I managed to cut two pieces of plywood outside before I had to go inside and lie down. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. I don't check emails that often and our phone ran out of charge today. I can only respond on a PC and have not been near one since Wednesday. Best regards, Bruce From:josephgill <josephgill@comcast.net> To: brucewaluck@yahoo.com Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 1:19 PM Subject: Rain on April 7 Drywell flooded and overflowing to our yard - black cloth and rectangular stone at top of photo - Joe Sent from my iPhone 1 PO Box 1617 Marstons Mills, MA 02648 P. (508)420-1500 C H I L D S A R B O R I S T S pc@childsarborists.com Proposal INc Job Name: Gill 20160413 Date: 4113/2016 Joe Gill Work: (508) 362-1921 26 Burning Tree Road W. Barnstable, MA 02668 Work Site: 26 Burning Tree Road W. Barnstable, MA 02668 The following is a proposal for tree work on the work site listed above.All employees are covered by Farm Family Mutual Insurance # Item Description Cost 1 Eastern Red Replacement $6,100.00 Cedar Cost to replace a 20' Eastern Red Cedar, 10-12" diameter. Cost of tree $3000 plus installation, $2000.00. Labor, bio-stimulants, guying. Price is per tree. Notes: Subtotal: $6,100.00 Total: $6,100.00 Customer Signature Date &M 61sm �14636&nag" n ?llaf.lWstlis A�JIL561lVJCUA6� " VOICE Of TREE CARE •''"'` " "' 'A S S Page 1 of 1 f ZZ U S� L-4 PaF,e 1 July 31, 2017 Condensed Chronology of Significant Communication Between Local Inspector McKechnie, Mr. Gill, and Mr. Waluck 11/20/14: Complaint received from M. Gill of water flowing onto his property during construction of new house at 22 Burning Tree Lane, WB (Waluck property) 11/25/14: Mr. Gill met with Commissioner Perry and Local Inspector McKechnie 12/09/14: Photos received via email from Mr. Gill of storm (water-muddy water) runoff. Site visited by Commissioner Perry and Local Inspector McKechnie during rain to confirm Complaint 12/11/14: Mr. Ojala's plan received via email. Prepared for Mr. Gill at his own expense. 12/12/14: Inspector McKechnie discussed runoff issue at length with Mr. Waluck on the site. 04/13/15: Mr. Gill returns home from Florida lets the building department know that the runoff is continuing. 07/31/15: The runoff is continuing. Mr. Waluck suggests a final inspection take place early August 2015. 08/03/15: Inspector McKechnie emails Mr. Waluck informing him that the Final Inspection should take place after the runoff has been eliminated. 08/06/15: A phone conversation and in office Building Department discussion results in a final by Inspector McKechnie and an OK for a Temporary Occupancy Certificate due to hardship. 08/10/15: Temporay Certificate of Occupancy issued per Commissioner Perry. 10/13/15: First extension of Temporary Occupancy Certificate issued, noted that site work is needed. 10/13/15-12/09/15: Countless emails and phone calls. Runoff lessens but still exists after attempts to contain. 12/10/15: Temporary Certificate of Occupancy expires. 07/11/15: Request for a Certificate of Occupancy. Many emails and phone calls.Attempts at water containment continue. Runoff still exists. Some site visits. 04/19/16: Certified letter mailed. r Page 2 04/21/16: Mr. Waluck reminded via email that no additional Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Permit extensions will be issued until the runoff is eliminated. Also notified that a certified letter is in the mail to him. He had visited the Building Department earlier expecting a certificate of occupancy to be issued to him. A second email is sent to Mr. Waluck with a copy of the certified letter attached. Week of 05/15/16: Mr. Coughanowr(Eco Tech) comes into the Building Department to discuss a Design that.he has come up with for the containment system. 08/08/16: Final plan received from Mr. Coughanowr(Eco Tech) via email. I emailed him with a request for more information.This information is not necessary to continue but suggested. Many emails and calls received and exchanged about the design. 08/24/16: As of this date and 12:15 PM no work has started on the system at 22 Burning Tree Lane. 08/25/16: Emails from Mr. Gill. Councilor Wallace, Mr. Scali, Mr. Ells regarding the issue. 08/28/16: Emails. Question about design of retention area from Mr. Gill 09/12/16: Mr. Waluck emailed with news that system was installed. Pictures were provided. 09/13/16: Mr. Gill emailed a thank you to Mr.,Scali. 09/20/16: Email from Mr. Waluck with pictures showing containment system functioning during a rain event. 09/21/16: Email received from Mr. Waluck with another picture of system working in the downpour. 09/21/16: Site visit by Inspector McKechnie. No issues observed. Email Inspector McKechnie to Commissioner Roma. 09/23/16: Full Certificate of Occupancy issued for 22 Burning Tree Lane, WB Waluck Property 09/26/16: Mr. Gill requested a copy of the plan of the detention area. He stated he would come by 200 Main Street to pick it up. 10/13/16: Email from Mr. Gill to Mr. Scali requesting details of the design of the system and mention of a flow of water coming from a pile of rocks onto the road. Questioned if it was coming from a sump pump on the Waluck property. There was no evidence of a sump pump in the basement of the house when the final inspection was performed. 05/06/17: Email from Mr. Gill. Questioned whether or not the drywell system functioned over the J r r Page 3 winter.Another mention of water flow from the rock pile with a picture of same. I could not tell if there was any water flow that was not normal. 07/11/17: Phone communication between Councilor Wallace and Mr. and Mrs. Gill about all issues of water flow, runoff, etc. Communicated via email from Mr. Scali to Mr. Ells, Inspector McKechnie, Mr. Lauzon, and Councilor Wallace. 07/17/17: Mr. Gill emailed all parties regarding the July 7`h, 2017 storm,that caused water to flow from The Waluck Property onto the Gill Property. Stated the large system worked but the small system failed. (Please Note: the storm on july 71h, 2017, dumped in excess.of 4" of rain over a short time. This storm resulted in flooded roads and intersections over the whole of Cape Cod. Referred to as a 100 year storm.) Please note that.Mr. Gill has only emailed the Town of Barnstable Officials, not.Mr. Waluck. 07/26/17; Mr. Scali emailed Mr. Gill. Relayed the findings of an inspection by the Conservation Agent on July 25`h.The findings reflected no evidence of property damage or abnormal significant flow of water from the Waluck property onto the Gill property. 07/26/17: Mr. Gill replied with a request for a meeting. He contended that the runoff situation has Gone on now for three years and must come to an end. See text for details. 07/27/17: After many inter department emails, Meeting Scheduled for 11:OOam Thursday 08/03/17. This is current as of 9:30am 07/31/17. Emails and correspondence not including myself may have been omitted from this report but may still exist. Robert McKechnie Locallnspector Building Department Town of Barnstable I Page 11 July 31, 2017 Condensed Chronology of Significant Communication Between Local Inspector McKechnie, Mr.Gill, and Mr.Waluck 11/20/14: Complaint received from M.Gill of water flowing onto his property during construction of new house at 22 Burning Tree Lane,WB(Waluck property) 11/25/14: Mr. Gill met with Commissioner Perry and Local Inspector McKechnie 12/09/14: Photos received via email from Mr. Gill of storm (water-muddy water) runoff. Site visited by Commissioner Perry and Local Inspector McKechnie during rain to confirm Complaint 12/11/14: Mr.Ojala's plan received via email. Prepared for Mr.Gill at his own expense. 12/12/14: Inspector McKechnie discussed runoff issue at length with Mr. Waluck on the site. 04/13/15: Mr. Gill returns home from Florida lets the building department know that the runoff is continuing. 07/31/15:The runoff is continuing. Mr.Waluck suggests a final inspection take place early August 2015. 08/03/15: Inspector McKechnie emails Mr.Waluck informing him that the Final Inspection should take place after the runoff has been eliminated. 08/06/15:A phone conversation and in office Building Department discussion results in a final by Inspector McKechnie and an OK for a Temporary Occupancy Certificate due to hardship. 08/10/15:Temporay Certificate of Occupancy issued per Commissioner Perry. 10/13/15: First extension of Temporary Occupancy Certificate issued, noted that site work is needed. 10/13/15-12/09/15: Countless emails and phone calls. Runoff lessens but still exists after attempts to contain. 12/10/15:Temporary Certificate of Occupancy expires. 07/11/15: Request for a Certificate of Occupancy. Many emails and phone calls.Attempts at water containment continue. Runoff still exists.Some site visits. 04/19/16: Certified letter mailed. w Page � 2 04/21/16: Mr.Waluck reminded via email that no additional Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Permit extensions will be issued until the runoff is eliminated. Also notified that a certified letter is in the mail to him. He had visited the Building Department earlier expecting a certificate of occupancy to be issued to him.A second email is sent to Mr.Waluck with a copy of the certified letter attached. Week of 05/15/16: Mr. Coughanowr(Eco Tech)comes into the Building Department to discuss a Design that he has come up with for the containment system. ' 08/08/16: Final plan received from Mr. Coughanowr(Eco Tech)via email. I emailed him with a request for more information.This information is not necessary to continue but suggested. Many emails and calls received and exchanged about the design. 08/24/16:As of this date and 12:15 PM no work has started on the system at 22 Burning Tree Lane. 08/25/16: Emails from Mr.Gill. Councilor Wallace, Mr.Scali, Mr. Ells regarding the issue. 08/28/16: Emails.Question about design of retention area from Mr.Gill 09/12/16: Mr.Waluck emailed with news that system was installed. Pictures were provided. 09/13/16: Mr. Gill emailed a thank you to Mr.Scali. 09/20/16: Email from Mr.Waluck with pictures showing containment system functioning during a' rain event. 09/21/16: Email received from Mr.Waluck with another picture of system working in the downpour. 09/21/16:Site visit by Inspector McKechnie. No issues observed. Email Inspector McKechnie to Commissioner Roma. 09/23/16: Full Certificate of Occupancy issued for 22 Burning Tree Lane,WB Waluck Property . 09/26/16: Mr.Gill requested a copy of the plan of the detention area. He stated he would come by 200 Main Street to pick it up. 10/13/16:Email from Mr.Gill to Mr.Scali requesting details of the design of the system and mention of a flow of water coming from a pile of rocks onto the road. Questioned if it was coming from a sump pump on the Waluck property.There was no evidence of a sump pump in the basement of the house when the final inspection was performed. 05/06/17: Email from Mr.Gill. Questioned whether or not the drywell system functioned over the r Page I3 winter.Another mention of water flow from the rock pile with a picture of same. I could not tell if there was any water flow that was not normal. 07/11/17: Phone communication between Councilor Wallace and Mr. and Mrs.Gill about all issues of water flow, runoff,etc.Communicated via email from Mr.Scali to Mr. Ells, Inspector McKechnie, Mr. Lauzon,and Councilor Wallace. 07/17/17: Mr. Gill emailed all parties regarding the July 7th, 2017 storm,that caused water to flow from The Waluck Property onto the Gill Property.Stated the large system worked but the small system failed. (Please Note:the storm on july 7th, 2017,dumped in excess of 4" of rain over a short time. This storm resulted in flooded roads and intersections over the whole of Cape Cod. Referred to as a 100 year storm.) Please note that Mr. Gill has only emailed the Town of Barnstable Officials, not Mr.Waluck. 07/26/17: Mr.Scali emailed Mr.Gill. Relayed the findings of an inspection by the Conservation Agent on July 251h.The findings reflected no evidence of property damage or abnormal significant flow of water from the Waluck property onto the Gill property. 07/26/17: Mr. Gill replied with a request for a meeting. He contended that the runoff situation has Gone on now for three years and must come to an end. See text for details. 07/27/17:After many inter department emails, Meeting Scheduled for 11:00am Thursday 08/03/17. This is current as of 9:30am 07/31/17. Emails and correspondence not including myself may have been omitted from this report but may still exist. L Robert McKechnie f Local Inspector / Building Department) Town of Barnstable f f Town of Barnstable OME 1p� Regulatory Services Richard V.Scali,Director AMUA AA- Building Division IMMSTAS BARNSTABI;E Paul Roma 1639. 10 f iso-wia A'F0 �a Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.maxs August 24, 2016 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Mr. Bruce W. Waluck RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane Mrs. Susan E. Waluck West Barnstable, MA 02668 22 Burning Tree Lane Map: 136 Parcel: 025 West Barnstable, MA 02668 Mr. and Mrs. Waluck, Your Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the subject property expired on December 10, 2015. You are currently in violation of: 1.) The Massachusetts State Building Code 780 CMR R110 Certificate of Occupancy as amended. 2.) The Town of Barnstable General Ordinances Chapter 240-124B Occupancy Permits. All work necessary to satisfy the requirements for securing a Certificate of Occupancy for the subject property must be completed by September 30, 2016-or you will be subject to all applicable fines. By Order, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector 508-862-4033 robert.ncckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us Joe From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday,July 23, 2017 11:22 AM To: 'Bruce Waluck' Subject: RE:drywell performance on July 7, 2017 Bruce: It has been 2 weeks since I last heard from you. Have you developed a plan to correct the runoff and when will the work be done and completed? I am sure you are aware of this but just for the record whatever changes you make to the downspout flow it must go to a drywell as the town has required —otherwise it will just flow downhill onto our property. Your runoff from the storm on July 7 washed away a large section of mulch and driveway stones—and possibly endangering trees and shrubs along the property line. Joe From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] Sent:Sunday,July 9, 2017 5:15 PM To:Joe<josephgill @comcast.net> Subject: Re: drywell performance on July 7, 2017 H Joe, I will investigate the overflow and maybe reduce the amount of downspout flow to that area. This is the first time in almost a year that any great amount of water has left our property. Bruce On Fri Jul 07 2017 16:01:37 GMT-0400(Eastern Daylight Time), Joe <josephgill(cDcomcast.net>wrote: Bruce: I just checked your drywells today at about 3 PM during today's storm. The large pit and drywelll about 30 feet off the lot line appears to be working OK — it is full but not overflowing. The drywell at the property line that has small stone exposed in not working and there is a substantial flow of water onto our property — as I understannd it that is the drywell that is connected to your roof gutters and downspouts. I have still photos and video that I would like to show you. We need to discuss this situation - please contact me. Joe 1 i WEST BARNSTABLE, MA ?0 �D� �Jp Jai THIS IS A COLOR USE COLOR PLAN ONLY � TONOT FOR INSTALLATION SCALE FULL DETAIL IS BEST - VIEWED IN C N�A91• 't FULL COLOR 0!i jF. per �y 30zr JI 0 q YY�1 4 f / ax • A;p ,• \. PATIO' m'O=+ ?v a sEPnc x `\ SOIL ABSORPTION ' �•, \YSTEw c < r -OT 1® AREA =35200 sf+- u,.. K . ( . „ vuN BOOK2aSA-111 107 ASSR MAY 136 i&l,2,5 �• 3`r— _ � r a ftft GP1 A N SCALE: 1 in = 3L., ft n 60 PRINT OY1 it r 17 in PAPER FOR "PROPER SCALci PROPOSED RUNOFF DETENTION AREA DIMENSION AND DETAIL �- 4 T� 3173 fl DM ~\ L.h COUGHANOWk�n' ?ICi'.{ath 62.25 ft 1p SECTION A=a •---•�/ ��c;��-%��/� - �.SgN__Rngl 27.33 ft .. 17.33 ft' N O T SECTION 8-8 TO SCALE PROPOSED RUNOFF CONTROL PLAN -TO SERVE EXISTING ONELLBYO BRUCE W. AND SUSAN E. WALUCK OW AVM OF RECORD T 22:BURNING...TREE LANE 155 oeo Ryydet Res WEST.,BARNSTABLE. MA . Chothola AAA 02639 PROPERTY ADDRESS:::.:. Dov"OUGXotmouxom DATE JULY 27 2016 508 364-0894 Pn v1 .w. DRPL-1612 r WEST BARNSTABLE. MA THIS IS A COLOR NL4 PLAN t �{ NOT USE COLOR PLAN ONLY ".. "",''" TO FOR INSTALLATION FULI DETAIL IS REST SCALE I VIEWED IN FULL COLOR `�aq�Rgy b IT o�cvs�3ikaP� 90\ W A �i�ENT70AF 17 12VArlo3. ,x' r 1 I s t c SEPTIC m g , SOB.``• $(/ rg'-t x "y� ! ABSORPTIONYSTEAI �' IS AREA -35200 rf+- r Je PLAN BOOvK 2a136A PAGE I07 assR „ c�.� �� _ sE .ram. •�. *-col. y '� FILE A 3Y SCALE: I in = ::t: ft C. 60 PAINT ON i! r I? ;n P4PEA FOR PAOPEA SCAL PROPOSED RUNOFF DETENTION AREA - ptr.;ENt ON AND cEraiL lIk s AWD D. ' DIJGl1AN0\WRw. 62.26 fr , No.1003 j I- M.;, ?,�( SECTION A-A 27.33 ft 17.03 ft N0 T SECTION 8-8 T O SCALE q PROPOSED RUNOFF CONTROL PLAN -TO SERVE EXISTIM ONELLDW BRUCE W. AND SUSAN E. WALUCK t>L�Rrs,of REL'OR'O 22:BURNING TREE LANE lss o aydel Res WEST BARNST'ABLE. MA ' - chat ath eo 00 MA 02639 PRO ERTY ADDRESS Dovidcoo®Hotmofixom imm.JULY 27 2016 508 364-0894�l-03- DRPL-1812 ,ose h Gill From: Bruce Waluck[brucewaluck@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:35 PM To: Joseph Gill Subject: Re: landscaping Hi Joe, We fully understand your concern of the long term effects as a result of the house going in. I want you to feel confident and know that I plan on doing whatever it takes to control the run-off. There are a number of ways we can do that and dry wells are definitely included. The newly paved road should have a curbed edge to direct rain water towards the drain and we should ask for it. We intend to remove material but at this point it is too soon to tell how much, we still have to dig the septic. Zoe lot slopes four feet across the front. We want to flatten that out and not build it up. It looks ugly w with all the piles and the rough foundation but everything will work out. Our plan is to pick up another silt fence and hay bales tomorrow, install on Saturday. Regards, Bruce From: Joseph Gill <iosephgill(o)comcast.net> To: Bruce& Susan Waluck<brucewaluck@_Vahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:03 AM Subject: landscaping Bruce: We talked about landscaping a few days ago and here is the info that I promised. When we renovated in 1998-99 we used Tom McCarthy of Shamrock Landscaping, located in Sandwich, best way to reach Tom is his cell 508-509-8530. Tom designed and constructed most of what you see in our yard; the driveway, parking areas, plantings and drainage. Tom also has done our yard maintenance for many years — spring and fall clean up and lawn cutting, etc during the summer. He is reliable, has good people and is an excellent resource for planning and when questions come up. I think you would really benefit by talking with him now, pick his brains and get a review of your plans. I recommend him highly. With the clay soil we both have, drainage is really important otherwise runoff will get into window wells and the basement —we have a neighbor with a cracked foundation • J josephgill From: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 11:31 AM To: josephgill@comcast.net Subject: Re:dry well HI Joe The system I just installed will cost us over$2,000... in terms of the heavy machine needed,the stone, the chamber, and the cleanup, not to mention the time that I just don't have--but I am putting time into it for you. Not to mention the upcoming costs of the downspouts and the trenching needed to channel the water....another $4,000. We're been quoting that already. I will not debate the water storage design with you. It will not be 10 times larger. Are you kidding? Most of these calculations do not take into account that we have 22 tons of stone underneath. How many people do you know have a 3,906 gallon tank in their back yard? Bruce From: Joseph Gill <joseph gill@comcast.net> To: Bruce& Susan Waluck<brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 7:45 AM Subject: dry well Bruce: We are glad to see you working at a dry well solution and appreciate your efforts. I googled ADS but could not find anything.Please send me their web site and show me how you did the calculation to arrive at the structure you placed yesterday that is about 300 gallons. I did find NDS Flo-Well and used their dry well calculator—for the rear half of the roof I plugged in 1,000 sq ft and a Coefficient of Runoff of 1.0 and for the back yard lawn I used 17,600 sq ft and a Coefficient of 0.35. I used 1.75 for the 25 year rainfall for our zone. The calculator results are 130 gallons per minute and it calls for a tank capacity of 3,906 gallons which is about 10 times larger than the tank you have. Thanks,Joe r Joe From: Daniel A.Ojala PE, PLS <downcape@downcape.com> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe' Subject: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Attachments: 14-350 DRAINAGE REPAIR 11x17 (1).pdf Joe: Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. The design if for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A.Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering,inc. 939 Main St.Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. i rr1 Y = Lo MAP 136 aJ 026 % ILL SIDENCE \% O SEPTI y 0 SYS 0 EXISTING OwEl1WG 10 N� MAP 1 6 02 DRIVE MAP 0136# # 2 C PLAN VIEW scale:14=40' �p �< 0 20 40 60 80 100 FEETLEAVE OPEN SAND 0 TEMPORARY FILTER FABRIC SEIWEEN FRAME h GRATE CONSTRUCTION UNTIL SITE STABILIZED 1 ... ...... \ �� PERIOD POOLING REMOVE CONSTRUCTION SILTATION PRIOR ZONE DEPTH PER TO FINAL PLANTING, PLACE SOD ON RETENTION AREA � �O,� PLAN PRIOR TO REMOVING FILTER FABRIC \ LINE AND GRADE PER REMOVE CONSTRUCTION SILT AS REQUIRED PLAN NEW UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED. ® Of, PLACE DOUBLE LAYER OF FILTER 0 •.;z', FABRIC BETWEEN FRAME AND w .�- GRATE UNTIL SITE STABLE ."'•``'• _ c� Z\ Rai Fl 32.0 �,�:.'•.;'.: <� in . COARSE SAND COARSE SAND u FILL FILL Scale:l'=10' 10 SCALE DETAIL VIEW BASIN FILL ...,_.,.:•.- UNSUI TABLE SOIL REMOVAL ;_::,:o•. TOP EL 27.0 REQUIRED ..•. ;;;;,,,;,;;,�;; OVERALL SIZE 0 5 10 15 20 25 FEET io 18 %34 X75' DRAINAGE eeg_eoeoe`� —� SKETCH PLAN W-8' X 8'O N-20 Co LOCATED AT 1000 GAL LEACNPIT 4$CN40 PVC AT SHOREY EQuu ORIGINAL CLEAN sANO BELGw 22 BURNING TREE LANE 2% MIN. IN FROM W PER SOIL IOC,TH2 REAR ROOF DRAMREMOVE TO CLEW SAND, WEST BARNSTABLE, MA REPLACE SILT LOAM wm CLEAN COARSE SAPID \ 31e— 1 1/2' PREPARED FOR DOUBLE WASHED STONE I 4' MIN.AROUND PIT JOSEPH GILL FOR #22 SITE SECTION VIEW DECEMBER 11, 2014 N.T.S. I off 508-362-4541 NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO Paz ncope.com112 @ LOCATE UTILITIES AND NOTIFY downcope.com p DIGSAFE, ADJUST GRADES TO down cope engifeeiinB iac. MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS, PREPARED BY: DANIEL A. OJALA, P.L.S., P.E. -- -� --_ r I s Joe From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday,August 18, 2015 4:03 PM To: Thomas Perry(thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us) Cc: Phil Wallace; Bob McKechnie(robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) Subject: FW:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Attachments: 14-350 22 Burning Tree Drywell Calcs.pdf, RATIONAL 14-350.pdf Tom: This is a second email from Dan Ojala With the design calculations. Dan's design has over 5,000 gallons of capacity; Mr Walluck has approximately 1,500 gallons. Also note that Dan calls for a second drywell for the front roof drains. Regards, Joe Gill From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS[mailto:downcape@downcape.coml Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 8:45 AM To: 'Joe' <josephgill@comcast.net> Cc: 'Heather Vermette'<hvermette@downcape.com> Subject: RE:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Hi, Joe: The four feet of stone around the 1,000 gallon pit provides an additional 3,000 gallons for 3,920 gallons total storage. Storage volume above the rim in the bowl and in the voids in the sand is not included,that would add to the capacity. The trick is to keep the water going into this leaching system clear from silt. If kept clean,it will reliably infiltrate 224 gallons per minute into the ground, so the storage volume under these conditions is wholly adequate. I was thinking another drywell should be used for the front roof drain, I just did the calcs for the rear of the roof. Attached are drywell capacity and the rational drainage design utilized. Thanks, Daniel A.Ojala PE,PLS I . down cape engineering, inc. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS DATE:6-10-2014 DOWN CAPE ENGINEERING DRAINAGE AREA: DA1-REAR ROOF AND YARD DRAINING TO GILL SIDE DRAINAGE AREA COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS: AREA OF PAVEMENT/DRIVES/BUILDINGS: 2,200 SF 0.05 AC. AREA OF LAWNS AND WOODS: 13200 SF 0.30 AC. TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 15400 SF 0.35 AC. CURVE NUMBER PVT/BLDGS: 0.95 CURVE NUMBER LAWN/WOODS: 0.41 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER: 0.49 (PVT AREA*0.95+GRASS*0.41)/TOTAL AREA) RATIONAL METHOD DRAINAGE SIZING: Q=CIA, SF REQ=Q*448.8 GPM/CFS(1/0.6)GPM/SF DRAINAGE AREA. 15400 SF CURVE NUMBER: 0.49 RATIO RAINFALL INTENSITY: 3.5 IN./HR (SEE NOMOGRAPH) GPM/SF RATIO: 0.6 GPM/SF (<2MIN/IN PERC RATE) LEACHING AREA REQUIRED: 451 SF USE ONE 6X14 LEACHING CATCH BASINS WITH STORAGE OVER, SQUARE FOOTAGE 453 SF>443 SF O.K. 001 down cape engineering 14-350 22 Burning Tree Drywell Calcs.xls HYDRO-CAD DRAINAGE ANALYSIS INFORMATION STAGE-DISCHARGE AND STAGE STORAGE TABLE DAI 6'DIA PRECAST LEACHING PITS, 6'-8"HIGH 3/4" - 1-1/2" WASHED STONE FOR EFF.DIA SELECTED 3'DEEP LEACHING TRENCHES BETWEEN STRUCTURES IF REQ. INPUT VARIABLES: NUMBER OF LEACHPITS. 1. (NO.PITS) LENGTH OF TRENCHES: 0 (FT.) WIDTH OF TRENCHES: 0 (FT.) INVERT OF STRUCTURES: 25 (EL.ABOVE DATUM) EFFECTIVE DIAMETER PITS: 14 (STONE+LPIT O.A. DIA) STONE VOID RATIO,E: 0.4 (FT3/FT3) DESIGN LEACH RATE: 0.5 (GPM/SF) CALCULATED VALUES: `COP OF PRECAST STRUCTURES ELEV.: 27.00 BOTTOM LPIT ELEV. 20.33 BOTTOM TRFNI CH EL. 23.00 ELEVATION(FT) STORAGE(CUTT.) DISCHARGE(CFS) 20.23 0 0 20.33 0 0.17 21.00 52.6 0.19 22.00 131.2 0.25 22.93 204.2 0.30 23.00 209.7 0.30 24.00 288.2 0.35 25.00 366.8 0.40 26.00 445.3 0.45 27.00 523.8 (3,920 gal) 0.50 G � > Legend A 0 � 0 : bWA N ,� � ,i u � a w t- -'� i x Spot Heights(NAVD88) —Intermediate Contours(NAVD88) 1y 136007 �' I ++ X 1 f1 — Index Contours(NAVD88) �. '#339 f� /l ti::: r \ 2 -1 Z (1� l Parcels t I ,J ! '` .•.• r. jJ Town Boundary Railroad Tracks f'136006� I r I r#027t�'7j k r / �+r r Buildings 136014002b�/ x ,) .� 1 f+ r — Painted Lines 136052 j �r I 1 Parking Lots Paved 7- Unpaved Driveways ❑ Paved Unpaved / i ri 1.1136014001 /x 29.32 ..:. ti I j! �f� x ( /�' jJ Roads .:7....,.;.::r:::::�-':•..;.:.! I 1 i`/ f "li; ❑ Paved Road I ya3.-'..�...�,'•.,:_�.r�:. ` ,I 1 / r �- Unpaved Road +;'j ®Bridge Paved Median Streams Marsh 1 .436026 ,r�''� 1 1 '4 ❑ Water Bodies 435003 33 136016 35-92 136017 023 (-7"1361027 1360 r ...�� 7.74 �L1�.�'' ti � � � I i7 �i` r•. #t464'"^�. 1 1�3661 B 10 5 t 36029 #,43 3S za # Map printed on: 7/27/2017 This map is for illustration purposes only.It is not Parcel lines shown on this map are only graphic Town of Barnstable GIS Unit adequate for legal boundary determination or representations of Assessor's tax parcels.They are Feet regulatory interpretation.This map does not represent not true property boundaries and do not represent 367 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 026oi O 83 167 0 an on-the-ground survey.It may be generalized,may not accurate relationships to physical objects on the map 5o8-862-4624 reflect current conditions,and may contain such as building locations. Approx.Scale: finch= 83 feet cartographic errors or omissions. gis@town.barnstable.ma.us Legend i • ` ! U Allr��a H 1 x Spot Heightst D88) ` ....` A —Intermed' Co n ou s(NAVD88) 136007 '• �� p _ .. X hr`r� —Index Contours(NAVD88) r�f �1! �.Parcels Town Boundary y J 5t r + }t Railroad Tracks 10 Buildings Painted Lines #350 � 136052 r� Parking Lots O Paved unpaved Driveways P , f ®Paved 29: l2' unpaved Roads p �#330 :� - / r: Paved Road ' f Iff 13 Unpaved Road rr � 0 Bridge ■Paved Medan Streams tt5 Marsh r .136026� t7 Water Bodies 50 ✓ 1l Jfs'-/ � � � �� 13601 r" �• ` ` j •� iJff _ 1360241 ?C ,.- \ Y s -17 1300 Q. 13602T A r '13 8 'o\ �,-_- ��--136029o� :e r f Map printed on: 7/27/2017 This map is for illustration purposes only.It is not Parcel lines shown on this map are only graphic Town of Barnstable GIS Unit adequate for legal boundary determination or representations of Assessor's tax parcels.They are Feet regulatory interpretation.This map does not represent not true property boundaries and do not represent 367 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 O 83 167 an on-the-ground survey.It may be generalized,may not accurate relationships to physical objects on the map 5o8-862-4624 reflect current conditions,and may contain such as building locations. Approx.Scale: 1 inch= 83 feet Q cartographic errors or omissions. gis@town.barnstable.ma.us UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail Postage&'Fees Paid USPS Permit No.G-10 I I • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4®in this box* I TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING DIVISION 200 MAIN ST HYANNIS, MA 02601 i ,llJ rr f !!I i 11 r off III rs�;;�Er�fl:filf,; ;f � SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE TH.�S SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete I9 e item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired: ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. �' eived by(Prfn ed Name C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. D. Is delivery address different from: "1? 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery addre�� Ipvy; No�m I S"64'-' w G?g I 3 ��6 3�- I l&, ��%!//l��r_. -; rvlceType fil!Certified Mail® 17 Priority Mail Expr s" ❑Registered EFReturn Receipt for Merchandise ---- :-- — _- ❑ Insured Mail ❑Collect on Delivery ` ,�IIIIIIIII��11�I.11.LLl�.I�.Illl_�.ILILII�II_I_ILI_IIJII ��—o...,•.t,.•,,,�_n�r.,.e..,o_/cdy_G 1 n v... � (transfer froi � • `• , PS Form 381* T Postal CERTIFIED MAILT. RECEIPT ru (Domestic ru For rmation visit our website at www.usps.come r` deliveryO F• F I A CO Postage $ D� Her i N Certified FeeNO Ap Return Receipt Feep (Endorsement Required)Restricted Delivery Fee1 Q (Endorsement Required) t 092 pTotal Post�ge&Fees $ Sent T ni r-1 Street t r�,ftt - ------------------------- M or PO Box No. City State,Z/P+ PS Form 3800,August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions r Certified Mail Provides: ■ A mailing receipt ■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece ■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: ■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mails or Priority Mail®. ■ Certified Mail is tiot available for any class of international mail. ■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables,please consider Insured or Registered Mail. ■ For an additional fee,a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery.To obtain Return Receipt service,please complete and attach a Return Receipt(PS Form 3811)to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee.Endorse mailpiece'Return Receipt Requested'.To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt,a USPSe postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. ■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent.Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement"Restricted Delivery". ■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired,please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed,detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT:Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800,August 2006(Reverse)PSN 7530-02-000-9047 [Aju�67,r 7A., 14 � � I l i 44 cr� rat„ w0.-�,er o�n tiffs profe4l . ClACV�� do►(ti►)-j -Prbv�I`I( is lo`[. Gt�i1( 1Wre-ss Af er-P _. . LSC,- Sk" (k►u -Adl�QSec�— rkrvfinf/cQc�c Qv my c�uferin-�o | | p July-31, 2017 Condensed Chronology of SignificantCommunication Between Local Inspector W1cKechnie, Mr.Gill, and Mr.VVa|uck | ! 11/20/14:Complaint received from M. Gill of water flowing onto his property during construction | of new house at22 Burning Tree Lane,WB(Wa|uckproperty) ' � 1 Mr. Gill met with Commissioner Perry and Local Inspector K4cKechnie 12/O9/14: Photos received via ennai|fnom Mr.Gill of storm (xvater-nuddy water) runoff. | Site visited by Commissioner Perry and Local Inspector McKechnie during rain to confirm Complaint _ 12/11/14: Mr. Oaba's plan received'via email. Prepared for Mr. Gill othis ownexpense. � � � Inspector McKechnie discussed runoff issue at length with Mr.Waluck on the site. � � : Mr.Gill returns home from Florida lets the building department know that the runoff is continuing. D7/31/1S:The runoff b continuing. Mr.Wo|uch suggests a final inspection take place early August 2O15. 08/03/15: Inspector McKechnie emails Mr.Waluck informing him that the Final Inspection should take place after the runoff has been eliminated. D8/O6/1S:A phone conversation and in office Building Department discussion results inafinal , by Inspector McKechnie and an OK for a Temporary Occupancy Certificate due to hardship. 08/10/15:Temporay Certificate of Occupancy issued per Commissioner Perry. : First extension of Temporary Occupancy Certificate issued, noted that site work is ' needed. ` : Countless emails and phone calls. Runoff lessens but still exists after attempts to | contain. ~ :Temporary.Certificate of Occupancy expires. 07/11/15: RequestforaCertificateofC]ccupancy. Many ennai|s and phone calls.Attempts at water containment continue. Runoff still exists Sonlesitevbits 6: CertiOedlettermnaUed. N | ��� � I Page 12 04/21/16: Mr.Waluck reminded via email that no additional Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Permit extensions will be issued until the runoff is eliminated. Also notified that a certified letter is in the mail to him. He had visited the Building Department earlier expecting a certificate of occupancy to be issued to him.A second email is sent to Mr.Waluck with a copy of the certified letter attached. Week of 05/15/16: Mr. Coughanowr(Eco Tech)comes into the Building Department to discuss a Design that he has come up with for the containment system. 08/08/16: Final plan received from Mr. Coughanowr(Eco Tech)via email. I emailed him with a request for more information.This information is not necessary to continue but suggested. Many emails and calls received and exchanged about the design. 08/24/16:As of this date and 12:15 PM no work has started on the system at 22 Burning Tree Lane. 08/25/16: Emails from Mr.Gill. Councilor Wallace, Mr.Scali, Mr. Ells regarding the issue. 08/28/16: Emails.Question about design of retention area from Mr.Gill 09/12/16: Mr.Waluck emailed with news that system was installed. Pictures were provided. 09/13/16: Mr.Gill emailed a thank you to Mr.Scali. 09/20/16: Email from Mr.Waluck with pictures showing containment system functioning during a rain event. 09/21/16: Email received from Mr.Waluck with another picture of system working in the downpour. 09/21/16:Site visit by Inspector McKechnie. No issues observed. Email Inspector McKechnie to Commissioner Roma. 09/23/16: Full Certificate of Occupancy issued for 22 Burning Tree Lane,WB Waluck Property 09/26/16: Mr. Gill requested a copy of the plan of the detention area. He stated he would come by 200 Main Street to pick it up. 10/13/16: Email from Mr.Gill to Mr.Scali requesting details of the design of the system and mention of a flow of water coming from a pile of rocks onto the road. Questioned if it was coming from a sump pump on the Waluck property.There was no evidence of a sump pump in the basement of the house when the final inspection was performed. 05/06/17: Email from Mr.Gill. Questioned whether or not the drywell system functioned over the .__........�.._............................_........---._.._._......_._....._.._._............ .............................._..__............................................................................................._P...a...g.._e......._...._3.. winter.Another mention of water flow from the rock pile with a picture of same. I could not tell if there was any water flow that was not normal. 07/11/17: Phone communication between Councilor Wallace and Mr.and Mrs.Gill about all issues of water flow, runoff,etc.Communicated via email from Mr.Scali to Mr. Ells, Inspector McKechnie, Mr. Lauzon, and Councilor Wallace. 07/17/17: Mr. Gill emailed all parties regarding the July 7th, 2017 storm,that caused water to flow from The Waluck Property onto the Gill Property.Stated the large system worked but the small system failed. (Please Note:the storm on july 7th, 2017,dumped in excess of 4"of rain over a short time. This storm resulted in flooded roads and intersections over the whole of Cape Cod. Referred to as a 100 year storm.) Please note that Mr.Gill has only emailed the Town of Barnstable Officials, not Mr.Waluck. 07/26/17: Mr.Scali emailed Mr.Gill. Relayed the findings of an inspection by the.Conservation Agent on July 25th.The findings reflected no evidence of property damage or abnormal significant flow of water from the Waluck property onto the Gill property. .07/26/17: Mr. Gill replied with a request for a meeting. He contended that the runoff situation has Gone on now for three years and must come to an end. See text for details. 07/27/17:After many inter department emails, Meeting Scheduled for 11:OOam Thursday 08/03/17. This is current as of 9:30am 07/31/17. Emails and correspondence not including myself may have been omitted from this report but may still exist. Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable i Parcel Lookup Page 1 of 1 w � e v b U1N5 t"ABLE,.- Logged In As: Tuesday,January 24 2017 Nancy Larned Parcel Lookup Road Lookup Condo Lookup Multiple Address Lookuo Reports Search Options hL Search By Street Street# Street Name burn : Village West Barnstable v I Search <Prev Next> Page 1 of 1 Rows/Page: oo Parcel Location Owner Village Index Map 136- 22 BURNING TREE WALUCK, BRUCE W& SUSAN E WB 0199 136025 025 LANE 136- 25 BURNING TREE STOLTE, ROBERT R & SHIRLEY C WB 0199 136028 028 LANE TRS 136- 42 BURNING TREE GILL, NANCY F & JOSEPH B WB 0199 136026 026 LANE 136- 46 BURNING TREE ECKERT, KATHLEEN M WB 0199 136027 027 LANE http://issgl2/intranet/propdata/lookup.aspx 1/24/2017 Page 1 of 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: josephgill@comcast.net Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 12:21 PM To: Perry, Tom Cc: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Fwd: 11-17-2014 Water and mud flow from 22 Burning Tree this past weekend. Joe Gill From: Joseph Gill <iosephgill a,comcast.net> Date: November 18, 2014 at 9:08:26 AM EST To: Joseph Gill <josephgill(a�comcast.net> Subject: 11-17-2014 Sent from my iPad 11/20/2014 r , Page 1 of 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe Uosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 10:50 AM To: Perry, Tom Cc: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Tom: Thanks for the opportunity to visit with you on Nov 25 and a special thanks to you and Bob McKechnie for stepping in on the continuing runoff problem from 22 Burning Tree. Would you please copy me on any correspondence or orders that are issued to Mr Waluck. I do not know what runoff control activity is going on at 22 Burning Tree but I do know Mr Waluck installed a silt fence on Nov 25.but it didn't work and mud and water flowed to my property during the storms on Nov 26 and Dec 3. Regards,Joe 12/4/2014 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 12:21 PM To: Karle, Darcy; Perry, Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Dec 9, 2014 Attachments: FullSizeRenderjpg; Untitled attachment 00043.txt Darcy,Tom and Bob: Just to keep you updated I'm attaching a photo of today's storm -the photo shows a heavy flow of muddy water coming from 22 Burning Tree. Mr Waluck put in a silt fence and some hay bales and straw on Dec 5 and they are not doing any good.Thanks and Regards,Joe -----Original Message----- From: (mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net) Sent:Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:57 AM To:Joseph & Nancy Gill Subject: Dec 9, 2014 1 f Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 12:26 PM To: Karle, Darcy; Perry, Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Dec 9, 1014 Attachments: FullSizeRenderjpg; Untitled attachment 00037.txt Darcy,Tom and Bob: Another shot of the water and mud -Joe -----Original Message----- From: [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:58 AM To:Joseph & Nancy Gill Subject: Dec 9, 1014 1 V M ro y t•5� r. �� - '7F 1 40 ir :3 "'"" or- .� _ - �• — lop " Am 4 06 _a - Ohm- w s - p iL IL i . 4- � p ' F _ l s r � x -� J.. _ k� - �,: a�♦} ��: ;-ice �' � Ri pl d ell rA c+� Mckechnie, Robert From: Karle, Darcy Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 12:35 PM To: 'Joe'; Perry, Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Dec 9, 1014 Attachments: 100_3092 j pg I just spoke with Bob this morning about this. I told him I went out there Dec 5th and I had a feeling what he placed up was not going to hold in a storm like this. I believe he is going out there. He said he would keep me posted. -----Original Message----- From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill2comcast.netj Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 201412:26 PM To: Karle, Darcy; Perry,Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree- Dec 9, 1014 Darcy,Tom and Bob: Another shot of the water and mud -Joe -----Original Message----- From: iosephQill@comcast.net [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:58 AM To:Joseph & Nancy Gill i Subject: Dec 9, 1014 i i I 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Karle, Darcy Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 12:55 PM To: susan.waluck@fmr.com' Cc: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: FW: photos from 11/24/14 Attachments: 100_3092 j pg HI Susan, i I just wanted to forward you a photo I took on Dec 5th of the repair job on the property line. I took this photo, but the only other thing I noticed was a truck parked out in front of the house with straw wattles in the back. I was hoping they were just not finished with the repair and those additional wattles in the back of the truck were going in also. Very concerned with all this rain. If they were finished and this is what it looked like I am sure there are issues there today. I don't think this repair job was the best if it was left like that. I have a report that silted water is flowing today. Was the drywell hooked up? Please let me know. I asked Bob in building to check into this and report back to our office. -----Original Message----- From: Karle, Darcy Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:34 AM To: 'susan.waluck@fmr.com' Subject: photos from 11/24/14 Hello, Here are the photos I took on 11/24/14 Darcy Karle Conservation Agent Town of Barnstable Conservation Division 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4041 1 �' y-Z` ,s....0 '�I Ir. r '' •�Q ���1...,c.1'f!�l'P'i l�Q ,:� �� - ;�li. 2,f j� ~' ..1 �+ will", K"?!•- •l s'. �. , ♦W ` 1 yr �� s ..t F 7•+ �'i 1�"C 9h���' ��t"� �`'�R��11r1� � �` � Y � \•1 I � J _ r -41 � 1 IL - l! I�?�J'9`.x.t tixylYl�,`. ���{ems +�-_ ,{ �` f �J ►L`1�+ f 'J ^�-' (� AI'ei�6'�� � � �1 ���: � >,r :>!• 1a1� �,i�',:�,f�`1w •Y'*`n •:.�? .aF' � `}} ��'e•�l� =+•�j i :��.►" _ - � •� � ! '�'' .�( ,� k "ram w�� 7 vio- Lr- +w�-�-� ��Ji _.c r--+�h•!" .�h�.Y,O'� � /'� �` .'< tom" 'V _ r - ( -_ J• � i 1`ay f+.'ii-1� � 1 �r+..did � � e`I +�lz,� �� � ,� __ _ _ I'�-..✓ _ r r ,r� f .,..nrl �', -+- �, •�I 11�'"�ll �S.IS 1 � � i e•_ �•.'�c +. _ ..� -rv-,a.1�roL''6�; .,>.�.��^:'�.z c' � ...,!f� r::4 ,+, ��:^��1�.Y��ji�.;!� � �c. �,•` b•.�r'�`C-� �• .-{21'G?�:__ .� a ��. , "AlC ,j l ..1 �' �Y'" 1'•7 � � /, f11 3 ` �yGr« i ������ L'S � �, C��`�`f'��-�es?{ycw�rY t�: �.�:�y�irr r. •-,�Srzzw. �r e � r �•� •1F{ "o�a.L. •F��.fC.r!r a:�p,. �� ?"" 'rae - - _ '°-d•+a��. "- ,y �y f ��tKdsL6-Y-,v,��� 'Fai `r � r, ae+r,+C-may.•- -4�`gq�C�y.�r=Sr' a .,�?...,�.��`�. +:r_;w-�, . �rs„•.^�+"' �- i� { _ � � -. dr--i- -i�7♦'" y �i'�!y,�, ���„*+h �,:.- w,�!�k...2_Y: �'�5 �' �^c •.'4��II �'Jyy1...' ^,}'..'s.I"'(`!,�'n ."a-.1K"• _7� 'f�!!���'�'�" T.�. .iv. �< ��- '� vi`e•�i.��'d•��72r,.",�'�•/ �t�T`TI'��t(•..+_ .e.�� ? S��"'�'•a`• F�t ??�-'� �•rr y � - ^�/ ,� � �' -.ct�h('._ i .'Ta,• �_ �li''J��.�..U "''�'�r- may.M ,• 'i�t� .4-. A �+s,• �w,�v�?�: �. _ _t•`E' yt"' �1. ram.. �. fE�•w'4•s' .,t•'•+�S4 ! ,� C� •T i`� J �5-t � �Y--1t-�►_,„may �•�^�`r'r• �`'.�'9{� , � Page 1 of 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe Uosephgill@comcast.netj Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 9:22 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Karle, Darcy; Perry, Tom Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: Many thanks for your visit in the middle of the downpour today.As far as we know the Walucks have not sought professional help to stop the runoff onto our property—given the results we guess that's pretty clear. So we have hired Dan Ojala of Down Cape Engineering to produce a plan. Dan is working on the plan now and we hope to have it to you in time for your meeting with the Walucks this Friday. In addition to the damage to the wetlands, we are likely to lose some or all of the 7 large red cedars at the property line plus the water flow may undermine the foundation of our barn. Regards,Joe & Nancy , ' F 12/10/2014 r Message Page 1 of 1 Mckechnie, Robert -� From: Joe Uosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 9:46 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert '�9�►�' l / Cc: Karle, Darcy; Perry, Tom �hT Subject: FW: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Bob: For your meeting tomorrow please see the attached plan and the instructions below. We asked Dan to provide a reasonable and practical solution and he has done that. And of course we are paying for this plan. We will be traveling to Texas tomorrow but are available by cell at 508-733-1010.This is a plan that provides both a short term and long term solution to the runoff problem that has gone on for over 7 months. What is in place now we all know is not working and the damage to the wetland and our property continues. We would appreciate it if you would present this to the Walucks and we hope get their commitment to finally stop the runoff. Many thanks,Joe & Nancy From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS (mailto:downcape@downcape.com] �� Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe' Subject:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Joe: Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. The design is for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering, inc. 939 Main St.Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, Inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. 12/12/2014 i Ito Is CO rn ~nNJ � Y a MAP 136 vP \ • \ 026 ILL SIDENCE 2\9;, 0 SEPn SYS o EXISTING DWELLING N\j MAP 1 6 02 DRIVE MAP 136 # # 2 NON �R PLAN VIEW SGGIe:1•=40' 0 20 40 60 80 100 FEET \ Gy LEAVE OPEN SAND FOR TEMPORARY FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN FRAME& GRATE CONSTRUCTION UNTIL SITE STABILIZED PERIOD POOLING REMOVE CONSTRUCTION SILTATION PRIOR l` �a �.::•.'. ::':.•.:•.. ZONE DEPTH PER TO FINAL PLANTING, PLACE SOD ON RETENTION AREA \ �''W ✓ :::_::•'• ::• '• \ p PLAN PRIOR TO REMOVING FILTER FABRIC \✓ : ...\ \ �0� LINE AND GRADE PER REMOVE CONSTRUCTION SILT AS REQUIRED ® I O PLAN VIEW UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED. 7„ PLACE DOUBLE LAYER OF FILTERA FABRIC BETWEEN FRAME AND O\ •S GRATE UNTIL SITE STABLE RIM EL. 32.0 Gy\ CIL COARSE SAND COARSE SAND '.:•::.�:.�:.:',�• 5 FILL FILL `) SCOle:1"=10' 10 SCALE DETAIL VIEW BASIN FILL�•�•'.�;��'�.�•'•�•' UNSUITABLE SOIL REMOVAL TOP EL 27.0 REQUIRED OVERALL SIZE 0 5 r- 10 15 20 25 FEET : 18 X 34' X7.5' I 1n DRAINAGE 0000000� o 0 0�I aaeoeoe SKETCH PLAN H-20 I LOCATED AT o 1000 GAL LEACHPIT 4•SCH40 PVC AT SHOREY OR EQUAL o ORIGINAL CLEAN SAND BELOW 22 BURNING TREE LANE 2R MIN. IN FROM °-°o°S°o 90'PER SOIL LOG TH2 REAR ROOF DRAINS o-'. ono REMOVE TO CLEAN SAND. WEST BARNSTABLE MA zea;e¢a¢e,, REPLACE SILT LOAM WITH CLEAN COARSE SAND 0000000 ooa000 3/4- - 1 1/2- / PREPARED FOR DOUBLE WASHED STONE 4' MIN. AROUND PIT JOSEPH GILL FOR *22 SITE SECTION VIEW DECEMBER 11, 2014 N.T.S. I off fax 508-508-362-9880362-4541 NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO downcope.com p LOCATE UTILITIES AND NOTIFY DIGSAFE, ADJUST GRADES TO down co p,/TIC. MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS, PREPARED BY: DANIEL A. OJALA, P.L.S., P.E. a en,fineerin• O MAINTAIN DESIGN SHAPE. Civil engineers REF. SITE PLAN BY ECO-TECH land surveyors REVISED AUG. 30. 2013 939 Moin Street ( Rte 6A) DICE #14-3SO YARMOUTHPORT MA 02675 14-350 GILL.DWG r Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 3:32 PM ' To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: Checking in with you to ask what transpired today. Joe j 1 IMessage Page 1 of 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe Uosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 9:49 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Hello Bob: I appreciate the update. Based on the design study that Dan Ojala has done, Bruce's dry well is much too small. Bruce's gravel has storage of 1,500 gallons. Dan designed to handle the rear roof and back yard with 3,920 gallons plus the storage capacity of the Swale. Also Bruce's dry well is buried and has no provision for maintenance. Gutters and downspouts were installed Sunday but they are not connected to a dry well. The system Dan proposes can be moved south if it's getting too close to the geothermal coils. Has Bruce said what he will do now and in the spring? Many thanks for your help, Joe From: Mckechnie, Robert [ma ilto:Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Tuesday, December 16, 2014 4:29 PM To:Joe Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Hi Joe, Just enough time for a quick email. I discussed the runoff issue with Bruce at length on Friday. He reminded me that he has installed a "drywell system in the vicinity of the edge of the yard. He said that they excavated down to sand, added coarse gravel, some sort of a plastic drywell type of channel, and then covered it. This drywell apparently is designed to capture the roof runoff. I will ask him for a drawing to clarify. I did not furnish your design to him. That would have to be done by you. He also reminded me of a geo thermal or heating grid in much of the back lawn at that point. More to come. Have a good evening, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 -----Original Message----- From: Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 3:32 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: Checking in with you to ask what transpired today. Joe 12/18/2014 r Mckechnie, Robert From: Karle, Darcy Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:16 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane,WB Thank you Bob!! -----Original Message----- From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Monday,January 12,2015 4:37 PM To: Karle, Darcy Subject: 22 Burning Tree Lane,WB Hi Darcy, My last visit to the subject property was on December 12, 2014, to perform an insulation inspection on the new house. At that time I discussed the drainage issue at length with the Construction Supervisor/ Property Owner Bruce Waluck. I explained to him that a final inspection will not be done until the drainage/runoff problem has been eliminated. He also explained to me that he had installed an approximately 300 to 500 gallon (I cannot recall the exact amount at this time)drywell to collect the runoff from the house which was not connected yet. This was installed in a similar location as shown on the plan drawn by Dan Ojala for Joe Gill. The extent of the Building Department's enforcement is to ensure that the excessive runoff is eliminated by the time a Final Inspection is performed and Certificate of Occupancy is issued. This allows a contractor time to landscape the property and connect roof drains, etc. and perhaps proceed with further solutions to eliminate runoff. I will attempt to contact Bruce in the next week to discuss this problem again. Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 12:49 PM 1 To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Karle, Darcy; Macfitchjdf Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: We are just returning from 3 months in Florida. It looks like the runoff problem from 22 Burning Tree is about the same: the surface runoff is not connected to the drywell and continues to flow into our yard; and the back yard downspouts that were connected to surface flex piping that went to the drywell are no longer connected. Please update me on what's happening at your end. Regards, Joe I Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:43 AM , To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Karle, Darcy; Perry, Tom; Macfitchjdf Subject: 22 Burning Tree - occupancy permit Hello Bob: No further .news from 22 Burning Tree. The construction project is moving along but the drywell is still not functioning to collect surface water runoff from the rear yard. As of today none of the downspouts (front or rear) are connected to a drywel.l. I.just want to be sure that we are on the same page and that an occupancy permit will not be issued until the runoff problem is corrected. Please advise that this is the case. Also I: do not know if you have been able to confirm this but I continue to suspect that a sump pump connection is, contrary to regulations, putting water onto the street—the water flow hits the street 20 feet or so uphill from our driveway and water flows well after the end of a rain storm. Regards, Joe From: Joe [mailto:joseph.gillgcomcast.net] Sent: Monday,April 13, 2015 12:49 PM To: Bob McKechnie(robert.mckechnie@town.barn stab]e.ma.us) Cc: Darcy Karle(darc, .k�arle@town.barnstable.ma.us); Macfitchjdf Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: We are just returning from 3 months in Florida. It looks like the runoff problem from 22 Burning Tree is about the same: the surface runoff is not connected to the drywell and continues to flow into our yard; and the back yard downspouts that were connected to surface flex piping that went to the drywell are no longer connected. Please update me on what's happening at your end. Regards, Joe 1 I Mckechnie, Robert ' From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday,July 28, 2015 11:09 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: I'm checking in with you to see if the Walucks are at the point of asking for an occupancy permit. The rear downspouts are connected to the drywell — but the rear yard runoff is not going to the drywell and continues to run onto our property. Thanks and regards, Joe Mckechnie, Robert From: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 1:58 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Attachments: datauri-file.png Hi Bob, Final electrical is sighed off.... plumbing is soon. Can we get an occupancy approval later next week? Is there a day that's better for you? Bruce New cell phone # if needed is: 978-852-7774 From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie(3town.barnstable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck<brucewaluck cDyahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 4:12 PM Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bruce, All of the inspectors are in class Wednesday(tomorrow, 5/07) and Thursday (5/08)which means I will inspect the foundation on Friday the 9th if you will be ready. I should be at the site between 12 and 1 and you do not need to be there. I will either.sign the red card (if it's there) or leave a sticker will the results of the inspection. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Waluck to:brucewaluck ahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday M 06 2014 9:29 AM To: Mckechnie; Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bob, The foundation is in at 22 Burning Tree Lane. We'll be sealing it tomorrow and the "as built" plan is completed. The plan should be submitted to your office this week. Bruce i From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKech n ie(cDtown.barn stable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck(o),yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:10 AM Subject: 22 Burning Tree Lane WB Plan Review Update Hi Bruce, You or Susan should be getting a call from our staff either today or sometime tomorrow telling you to pick up the Building Permit Foundation Card. I just wanted to note the two items that will be required by the frame inspection so that these items will not be a surprise. They are: 1.) "Storm Shutters" are listed as the type of window protection selected to comply with the requirements of 780 CMR R301.2.1.2 and its amendment. Documentation showing that your choice of window protection complies with those requirements must be provided by the frame inspection. 2.) Wind wash barriers are required if fiberglass insulation is used in the house per the code. These were not shown on the plan but will be determined by the frame inspection and discussed. No other issues are apparent at this time. Bob McKechnie Local Inspector Town of Barnstable 508-862-403A I 2 .r Mckechnie, Robert From: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 8:12 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Attachments: ATT251866.png Hi Bob, Can we meet at your office on Wednesday or Thursday to discuss this? Please reply with a time and day that works best for you. Bruce ........................................ ___---.....................--................-................. _ _-.._.._----..._...._..---- _._.....__.... - -- ---._......_... _—_..------ ---.. From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie(a).town.barnstable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck(cDyahoo.com> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 4:19 PM Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane Good Afternoon Bruce, Per our previous discussions, a final inspection will be done only after the issue of runoff and drainage on the neighbor's lot is satisfactorily addressed. The latest communication from your neighbor stated that this hasn't been corrected. If you call next week when you have time we can further discuss this. Have a good weekend. Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] 'Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 1:58 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bob, Final electrical is sighed off.... plumbing is soon. Can we get an occupancy approval later next week? Is there a day that's better for you? Bruce 1 i New cell phone # if needed is: 978-852-7774 From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie @town.barn stable.ma.up To: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck6�yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 4:12 PM Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bruce, All of the inspectors are in class Wednesday (tomorrow, 5/07) and Thursday (5/08)which means I will inspect the foundation on Friday the 9th if you will be ready. I should be at the site between 12 and 1 and you do not need to be there. I will either sign the red card (if it's there) or leave a sticker will the results of the inspection. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck()yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 9:29 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bob, The foundation is in at 22 Burning Tree Lane. We'll be sealing it tomorrow and the "as built" plan is completed. The plan should be submitted to your office this week. Bruce From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie(@-town.barnstable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck(cDyahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:10 AM Subject: 22 Burning Tree Lane WB Plan Review Update Hi Bruce, You or Susan should be getting a call from our staff either today or sometime tomorrow telling you to pick up the Building Permit Foundation Card. I just wanted to note the two items that will be required by the frame inspection so that these items will not be a surprise. They are: 1.) "Storm Shutters" are listed as the type of window protection selected to comply with the requirements of 780 CMR R301.2.1.2 and its amendment. Documentation showing that your choice of window protection complies with those requirements must be provided by the frame inspection. 2.) Wind wash barriers are required if fiberglass insulation is used in the house per the code. These were not shown on the plan but will be determined by the frame inspection and discussed. No other issues are apparent at this time. Bob McKechnie Local Inspector Town of Barnstable '' 2 508-862-4033( a 3 . „M. essage Page 1 of 3 Mckechnie, Robert From: Bruce Waluck[brucewaluck@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 8:12 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bob, , Can we meet at your office on Wednesday or Thursday to discuss this? Please reply.with a time and day that works best for you. Bruce From: "Mckechnie, Robert” <Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck<brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 4:19 PM Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane Good Afternoon Bruce, Per our previous discussions, a final inspection will be done only after the issue of runoff and drainage on the neighbor's lot is satisfactorily addressed. The latest communication from your neighbor stated that this hasn't been corrected. If you call next week when you have time we can further discuss this. Have a good weekend. Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 1:58 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bob, Final electrical is sighed off.... plumbing is soon. Can we get an occupancy approval later next week? Is there a day that's better for you? Bruce 8/3/2015 i ;�--- Message Page 2 of 3 New cell phone # if needed is: 978-852-7774 From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie@town.barn stable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck<brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 4:12 PM Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bruce, All of the inspectors are in class Wednesday (tomorrow, 5/07) and Thursday (5/08)which means I will inspect the foundation on Friday the 9th if you will be ready. I should be at the site between 12 and 1 and you do not need to be there. I will either sign the red card (if it's there) or leave a sticker will the results of the inspection. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 9:29 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bob, The foundation is in at 22 Burning Tree Lane. We'll be sealing it tomorrow and the "as built" plan is completed. The plan should be submitted to your office this week. Bruce From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie@town.barn stable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck<brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:10 AM Subject: 22 Burning Tree Lane WB Plan Review Update Hi Bruce, You or Susan should be getting a call from our staff either today or sometime tomorrow telling you to pick up the Building Permit Foundation Card. I just wanted to note the two items that will be required by the frame inspection so that these items will not be a surprise. They are: 1.) "Storm Shutters"are listed as the type of window protection selected to comply with the requirements of 780 CMR R301.2.1.2 and its amendment. Documentation showing that your choice of window protection complies with those requirements must be provided by the frame inspection. 2.) Wind wash barriers are required if fiberglass insulation is used in the house per the code. These were not shown on the plan but will be determined by the frame inspection and discussed. No other issues are apparent at this time. Bob McKechnie 8/3/2015 l�lessage Page 3 of 3 Local Inspector Town of Barnstable 508-862-4033® I 8/3/2015 i Mckechnie, Robert I From: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday,August 04, 2015 7:56 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Attachments: ATT291674.png Hi Bob, Can we meet in your office at 9am this Thursday? Yes -- 978-807-6017 is the correct phone number. I'll call this morning as well. Bruce From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie()town.barnstable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck(cDyahoo.com> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 4:34 PM Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bruce, You can drive over to discuss this issue if you want. Thursday works this week. Is 978-807-6017 the correct number to reach you? And I will be here Thursday between 8 am and 10:30 in the morning or 3:30 to 4:30 in the afternoon. If we can set up a firm time I will be in the office to meet with you. The Commissioner wanted to be part of this discussion but his schedule may change on Thursday so he may not be able to be part of it. However, he will be determining whether the final inspection can be done now or if you will have to do more to alleviate the runoff. Please try to contact be phone tomorrow am. Thanks, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 :-----Original Message----- From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluckCa@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 8:12 AM To Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bob, Can we meet at your office on Wednesday or Thursday to discuss this? Please reply with a time and day that works best for you. Bruce From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie(cD_town.barn stable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck <brucewalucka-yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 4:19 PM Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane Good Afternoon Bruce, Per our previous discussions, a final inspection will be done only after the issue of runoff and drainage on the neighbor's lot is satisfactorily addressed. The latest communication from your neighbor stated that this hasn't been corrected. If you call next week when you have time we can further discuss this. Have a good weekend. Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 ' -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck()yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 1:58 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi.Bob, Final electrical is sighed off.... plumbing is soon. Can we get an occupancy approval later-next week? , Is there a day that's better for you? Bruce New cell phone # if needed is: 978-852-7774 From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie cDtown.barnstable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck(o)yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 4:12 PM Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bruce, 2 i All of the inspectors are in class Wednesday(tomorrow, 5/07) and Thursday (5/08)which means I will inspect the foundation on Friday the 9th if you will be ready. I should be at the site between 12 and 1 and you do not need to be there. I will either sign the red card (if it's there) or leave a sticker will the results of the inspection. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck(a)yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 9:29 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bob, The foundation is in at 22 Burning Tree Lane. We'll be sealing it tomorrow and the "as built" plan is completed. The plan should be submitted to your office this week. Bruce From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie(@town.barnstable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck<brucewaluck(Qyahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:10 AM Subject: 22 Burning Tree Lane WB Plan Review Update Hi Bruce, You or Susan should be getting a call from our staff either today or sometime tomorrow telling you to pick up the Building Permit Foundation Card. I just wanted to note the two items that will be required by the frame inspection so that these items will not be a surprise. They are: 1.) "Storm Shutters" are listed as the type of window protection selected to comply with the requirements of 780 CMR R301.2.1.2 and its amendment. Documentation showing that your choice of window protection complies with those requirements must be provided by the frame inspection. 2.) Wind wash barriers are required if fiberglass insulation is used in the house per the code. These were not shown on the plan but will be determined by the frame inspection and discussed. No other issues are apparent at this time. Bob McKechnie , Local Inspector Town of Barnstable 508-862-403A 3 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent:. Monday, August 17, 2015 8:50 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: trust a Certificate of Occupancy has not been issued yet. The Walucks were living in the house this past weekend. I am not savvy on the regulations so my question is whether this is a violation? The front downspouts were recently connected to the drywell. The rear downspouts were previously connected. However my major concern is that the principal source of runoff from the rear lawn is still not connected to the drywell. Thanks and regards, Joe From: Mckechnie Robert [MLt o:.R.obert.McKeclmie a town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 29,2015 :16 AM To: Joe<iosephgi l cr,comcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Good Morning Joe, No occupancy permit has been requested or issued for 22 Burning Tree as of this date. The final inspections have not been requested as of today and therefore have not been performed yet. Thanks for the update, Bob -----Original Message----- From: Joe [mailto:josephQill@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:09 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: I'm checking in with you to see if the Walucks are at the point of asking for an occupancy permit. The rear downspouts are connected to the drywell — but the rear yard runoff is not going to the drywell and continues to run onto our property. Thanks and regards, Joe i I Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday,August 18, 2015 3:51 PM To: Perry, Tom Cc: Phil Wallace; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Tom: I understand in talking to Bob McKechnie yesterday that you will be conducting a final occupancy inspection at 22 Burning Tree sometime over the next few weeks. I would like to be present for that inspection, and so please advise me of the time and date. I am very concerned about .the surface runoff from the rear yard of 22 Burning Tree. The drywell that was installed is not connected to surface runoff from the rear yard and the runoff continues to flow into our yard. Bob asked Mr Waluck for a drywell plan and it appears no plan was provided as there is no plan in the file. I would like a copy of that plan when it is produced. I believe the drywell is too small. In a separate email I will send you the plan I paid for that was executed by Dan Ojala of Down Cape Engineering. Dan's plan is substantially larger and it has a clean out which Mr Waluck does not have. I am asking that Mr Waluck connect the surface runoff to the drywell. Then we need to observe what happens in a heavy rainstorm. To be fair that test should occur once we have a few rainstorms so that the ground which is extremely dry now returns to normal moisture and runoff conditions. Please let me know if this is agreeable to you before a final occupancy permit is granted. Ever since the lot was cleared, every time it rains I have observed hundreds of gallons of water flow into my yard. This water damages the trees and shrubs along the property line and potentially will undermine the foundation of my barn. The water runs through my property and then into the adjacent marsh. I This problem can be solved with a properly designed drywell that can be periodically cleaned. hope that we will soon have a functioning drywell system in operation. Thanks and Regards, Joe Gill 508-733-1010 i From: Mckechnie, Robert Imailto:Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 9:34 AM To:Joe<iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Hi Joe, There is a temporary occupancy permit for the property at 22 Burning Tree Road per the Commissioner's (Tom Perry) approval. A full occupancy certificate will not be issued until the Commissioner does a final inspection. Tom is away this week and will arrange.for a final inspection with the owners when he returns. Have a good day, 1 i Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 -----Original Message----- From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 8:50 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: I trust a Certificate of Occupancy has not been issued yet. The Walucks were living in the house this past weekend. I am not savvy on the regulations so my question is whether this is a violation? The front downspouts were recently connected to the drywell. The rear downspouts were previously connected. However my major concern is that the principal source of runoff from the rear lawn is still not connected to the drywell. Thanks and regards, Joe From: Mckechnie, Robert [mail.to::Robert.McKechni.entown.bam'stable.ma.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 8:16 AM To: Joe <josephgillr�comcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Good Morning Joe, I No occupancy permit has been requested or issued for 22 Burning Tree as of this date. The final inspections i have not been requested as of today and therefore have not been performed yet. Thanks for the update, Bob -----Original Message----- From: Joe [mailto:josephgill0comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:09 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree I I Bob: I'm checking in with you to see if the Walucks are at the point of asking for an occupancy permit. The rear downspouts are connected to the drywell—but the rear yard runoff is not going to the drywell and continues to run onto our property. Thanks and regards, Joe 2 f Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday,August 18, 2015 3:54 PM To: Perry, Tom Cc: Phil Wallace; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: FW:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Attachments: 14-350 DRAINAGE REPAIR 11x17 (1).pdf Tom: This is the drywell design by Dan Ojala that I mentioned in an earlier email. Mr Waluck's design is well short on features and capacity. Regards, Joe Gill From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe' <iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Joe: Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. The design if for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering,inc. 939 Main St.Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 4:03 PM To: Perry, Tom Cc: Phil Wallace; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: FW:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Attachments: 14-350 22 Burning Tree Drywell Calcs.pdf; RATIONAL 14-350.pdf Tom: This is a second email from Dan 0jala with the design calculations. Dan's design has over 5,000 gallons of capacity; Mr Walluck has approximately 1,500 gallons. Also note that Dan calls for a second drywell for the front roof drains. Regards, Joe Gill From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 8:45 AM To: 'Joe' <iosephgill@comcast.net> Cc: 'Heather Vermette'<hvermette@downcape.com> Subject: RE: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan j Hi;Joe: The four feet of stone around the 1,000 gallon pit provides an additional 3,000 gallons for 3,920 gallons total storage. Storage volume above the rim in the bowl and in the voids in the sand is not included, that would add to the capacity. The trick is to keep the water going into this leaching system clear from silt. If kept clean, it will reliably infiltrate 224 gallons per minute into the ground, so the storage volume under these conditions is wholly adequate. I was thinking another drywell should be used for the front roof drain, I just did the calcs for the rear of the roof. Attached are drywell capacity and the rational drainage design utilized. Thanks, Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering, inc. 939 Main St.Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com J This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information'is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 7:53 AM To: Dan Ojala Subject: RE: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Dan: I just looked at the plan carefully and note the roof drain connection. I am sure you worked it out but I had expected a tank of more than 1,000 gal—does all of the sand work as additional tank capacity?Thanks again,Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:55 PM To: 'Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS' Subject: RE: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Dan: Thanks for getting this done today—I have forwarded it to Bob McKechnie. A very creative solution solving the problem both short term and long term -terrific! Does the pit and tank have the capacity to handle the roof or does that need a separate dry well—and if a separate dry well is needed for the roof should that be say a 1,000 gal for front and a 1,000 gal for rear?Joe I From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe' Subject: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Joe: Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. The design if for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. 'Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering, inc. 939 Main St. Yarmouthport, MA 2 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. r 3 down cape engineering 14-350 22 Burning Tree Drywell Calcs.xls HYDRO-CAD DRAINAGE ANALYSIS INFORMATION STAGE-DISCHARGE AND STAGE STORAGE TABLE DA1 6' DIA PRECAST LEACHING PITS, 6'-8" HIGH 3/4" - 1-1/2" WASHED STONE FOR EFF. DIA SELECTED T DEEP LEACHING TRENCHES BETWEEN STRUCTURES IF REQ. INPUT VARIABLES: NUMBER OF LEACHPITS: 1 (NO. PITS) LENGTH OF TRENCHES: 0 (FT.) WIDTH OF TRENCHES: 0 (FT.) INVERT OF STRUCTURES: 25 (EL. ABOVE DATUM) EFFECTIVE,DIAMETER PITS: . 14 (STONE+ LPIT O.A. DIA) STONE VOID RATIO, E: R 0.4 (FT3/FT3) DESIGN LEACH RATE: 0.5 (GPM/SF) CALCULATED VALUES: TOP OF PRECAST STRUCTURES ELEV.: 27.00 BOTTOM LPIT ELEV. 20.33 BOTTOM TRENCH EL. 23.00 ELEVATION (FT) STORAGE (CU.FT.) DISCHARGE(CFS) 20.23 0 0 20.33 0 0.17 21.00 52.6 0.19 22.00 131.2 0.25 22.93 204.2 0.30 23.00 209.7 0.30 24.00 288.2 0.35 25.00 366.8 0.40 26.00 445.3 0.45 27.00 523.8 (3,920 gal) 0.50 r down cape engineering, inc. i DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS DATE: 6-10-2014 DOWN CAPE ENGINEERING DRAINAGE AREA; DA1- REAR ROOF AND YARD DRAINING TO GILL SIDE DRAINAGE AREA COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS: AREA OF PAVEMENT/DRIVES/BUILDINGS: 2,200 SF 0.05 AC. AREA OF LAWNS AND WOODS: 13200 SF 0.30 AC. TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 15400 SF 0.35 AC. CURVE NUMBER PVT/BLDGS: 0.95 CURVE NUMBER LAWN/WOODS: 0.41 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER: 0.49 (PVT AREA'0.95+ GRASS"0.41)/TOTAL AREA) RATIONAL METHOD DRAINAGE SIZING: Q=CIA, SF REQ=Q"448.8 GPM/CFS (1/0.6) GPM/SF DRAINAGE AREA: 15400 SF CURVE NUMBER: 0.49 RATIO RAINFALL INTENSITY: 3.5 IN./HR (SEE NOMOGRAPH) GPM/SF RATIO: 0.6 GPM/SF (<2MIN/IN PERC RATE) LEACHING AREA REQUIRED: 451 SF USE ONE 6X14 LEACHING CATCH BASINS WITH STORAGE OVER, SQUARE FOOTAGE 453 SF>443 SF O.K. RATIONAL 14-350.x1s Page 1 of 1 rPage2 of 4 Richard Scali From: Ells, Mark Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:30 AM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Richard, Phil Wallace called today inquiring about this matter. Can you please look into the matter and get back to Mr. Gill? From: Philip Wallace [mailto:philip n wallace@)hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:33 PM To: Ells, Mark Subject: Fwd: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Hi Mark, You can see the request made by my constituent Joe Gill. Can we make his request possible? Cheers, Phil Sent from,my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Joe" <Josephgill.@co.mcast.n.et> Date: August 16, 2016 at 9:10:32 AM EDT To: "Phil Wallace" <philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Phil — if OK with please forward the email below to the Mark Ells. I think we should have a meeting with Mark as soon as possible which should include Bob McKechnie and Paul Roma. Based on what I know now I have many concerns. Thanks, Joe From:Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Tuesday,August 16, 2016 9:03 AM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (Paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <paul.roma@town,barnstable.ma.us> . Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: I'm glad we met at the Building Department counter yesterday afternoon. My 9/14/2016 I , Page 3 of 4 wife and I continue to be totally frustrated that this runoff has still not been corrected by Mr. Waluck— and after more than 2 years of promises and delays and runoff flooding our property. You gave me a copy of a plan by Eco- Tech dated July 27, 2016 showing a design of a detention area. There is very little information in this plan so as we discussed you agreed to call Eco-Tech to get more details. A complete'copy of the entire plan is needed including what are the tank like structures adjacent to the detention area and a copy of the runoff calculations showing water volume and disbursion into the sand layer that is about 10 feet below ground level. Also there must be a provision for clean out so that over time the system does not silt up and fail. Construction will leave the ground bare and so what provisions will be made to keep silt and mud from flowing into the system while grass is becoming established. All of the features I mention here were shown in the design for this property done by Dan Ojala of Down Cape. There should also be a letter or statement from Eco-Tech certifying the design and performance. My point is that you and I and the town must make reasonable efforts to be assured the Eco-Tech plan will perform properly before it is installed. Finally when will the work be done? Please email the information to me or I can go to your office to pick it up. Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday,August 5, 2016 1:15 PM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: We are sorry to report there is still no dry well construction activity at 22 Burning Tree. To put this into context Mr Waluck has had over 2 years too comply with town regulations and now he is almost 2 months beyond the June 15, 2016 completion date ordered in your Certified Letter of April 15, 2016. There is no excuse for this continued delay— Mr Waluck's email below clearly shows no urgency and borders on insult. We would like to meet with you and Mr. Roma at your earliest convenience. Please give us a call at 508- 733-1010 or an email to set up a date. We are copying Phil Wallace in the hopes that he can join us for the meeting. Many thanks, Joe and Nancy Gill 9/14/2016 i Page 4 of 4 From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewalucl<@yahoo.com] Sent:Wednesday,July 13, 2016 7:51 AM To:Joe and Nancy Gill<josephgill@comcast.net> Subject: Project Hi Joe, Still planning on investing in the drainage project. Our engineer is very busy and slow, but is getting closer to completion. I'll send email when I know more. Bruce I 9/14/2016 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: - Thursday, August 25, 2016 8:08 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Roma, Paul; Phil Wallace Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Bob: You did not respond on items 1 and 2 in my email below— please advise on those - Joe From: Mckechnie, Robert [mailto:Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Wednesday,August 24, 2016 4:26 PM To:Joe<josephRill@comcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Gill, You are correct about the certificate of occupancy not being issued until the system is in and proves itself. I will remind you that the property owner at#22 has every right to select any system that his engineer says will work. That is his choice. We will not review the system nor permit it because.the building code does not provide for such action: This is why we are relying on the engineer to provide the design. I will keep you posted,' Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street - Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 From: Joe [mailto josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 2:40 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Roma, Paul Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Bob: I should a.dd that it is my understanding that.the town will not issue an occupancy permit until We have proof that the runoff is stopped by observing successful performance in a heavy rainstorm.,) know there is a note to that effect in the file-but this is critical and I would appreciate your.confirmation on this point too. I think it also crucial that we all be confident i that the Eco-Tech design is very likely to correct the runoff before Mr Waluck proceeds. As you know the heavy clay conditions make it very difficult for water to perc. Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Wednesday,August 24, 2016 2:17 PM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barn stable.ma.us)<robe rt.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (pa ul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us)<paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: A short email to state where I believe we are on this project. 1.) You are working on a report that will be distributed shortly. 2.) You asked 3 questions on Eco-Tech re the design and performance of their proposed plan — I trust that will be available shortly and distributed to me and others. 3.) In you last email you indicated that Mr Waluck would decide what system to put in. I will reserve comment on that pending what Eco-Tech says re the design and performance of their plan. 4.) Once we all have items 1 and 2 above I want to have a sit down meeting with you and Mr Roma before the project proceeds. Please confirm 1 and 2 above. Regards, Joe 2 ' i I Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday,August 28, 20161:21 PM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; phi lip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr Scali: I have several questions concerning this project and would like to have a sit down meeting with you and Bob McKechnie and Paul Roma. Given the Sept 30 deadline I would like to meet this week if possible. I am available Tuesday 8 to 2; Wednesday 12 to 4; Thursday 8 to 11 and Friday 8 to 4. If we need to go into next week I am available on Sept 6 or 7 from 8 to 4. It would probably be best to meet once the final Eco-Tech plan is available so if you agree please set up a time accordingly. Regards, Joe Gill 508-733-1010 PS to Bob McKechnie — I trust you are the contact person on the plan — please email it to me when it's available. From:Scali, Richard [mailto:Richard.Scali@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Thursday, August 25, 2016 2:06 PM To:josephgill@comcast.net Cc:Weil, Ruth <Ruth.Weil@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Ells, Mark<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma.us>; philip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul <Paul.Roma @town.barnstable.ma.us>; Mckechnie, Robert <Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Gill: This is in response to your inquiry to Councilor Wallace which was forwarded to Mark Ells. I have consulted with Paul Roma and Bob McKechnie on the work they have done on this matter. .Just as a brief synopsis, which I am sure you are familiar with on this matter, began in Nov. 2014.You met with Commissioner Perry,we received photos, a plan was prepared at your expense on the run-off from Mr.Waluck's new home construction at 22 Burning Tree. In April, 2015,you informed us that the run-off continued. A final inspection was to take place August 2015 only after the run-off was eliminated. A temporary occupancy certificate was issued due to hardship. Between Oct. 2015-Dec. 2015, there were numerous phone calls and emails,whereby the run-off had lessened but still existed after attempts to contain.The temporary certificate expired Dec. 2015. In April 2016, a certified letter was sent to Mr. Waluck and emails stating no additional temporary certificates would be issued until the run-off was eliminated. Eco Tech visited the Building Dept in May, 2016 to discuss a containment plan. On Aug 8, 2016 a final plan was received from Eco Tech with many emails and calls back and forth on the design. On August 24, 2016, a Notice of Violation was sent out to Mr.Waluck stating that all work necessary to satisfy the Certificate of Occupancy must be completed by Sept 30, 2016 or he will be subject to fines. We hope that this letter will get the final plan to us with the necessary details for containment. If not,fines will begin. Thank you for your patience on this matter. ., 1 Richard Scali From: Ells, Mark Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:30 AM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Richard, Phil Wallace called today inquiring about this matter. Can you please look into the matter and get back to Mr. Gill? From: Philip Wallace [mailto:philip n wallace(abhotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:33 PM To: Ells, Mark Subject: Fwd: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Hi Mark, You can see the request made by my constituent Joe Gill. Can we make his request possible? Cheers, Phil Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Joe" <osehhgil_lr�c,,comcast.net> Date: August 16, 2016 at 9:10:32 AM EDT To: "Phil Wallace"_<Philip_n_wallace@)hotmail.com> Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Phil — if OK with please forward the email below to the Mark Ells. I think we should have a meeting with Mark as soon as possible which should include Bob McKechnie and Paul Roma. Based on what I know now I have many concerns. Thanks, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net) Sent:Tuesday, August 16, 2016 9:03 AM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (pa ul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <paul.roma@town.ba rnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: I'm glad we met at the Building Department counter yesterday afternoon. My wife and I continue to be totally frustrated that this runoff has still not been corrected by Mr. Waluck— and after more than 2 years of promises and delays 2 and runoff flooding our property. You gave me a copy of a plan by Eco-Tech dated July 27, 2016 showing a design of a detention area. There is very little information in this plan so as we discussed you agreed to call Eco-Tech to get more details. A complete copy of the entire plan is needed including what are the tank like structures adjacent to the detention area and a copy of the runoff calculations showing water volume and disbursion into the sand layer that is about 10 feet below ground level. Also there must be a provision for clean out so that over time the system does not silt up and fail. Construction will leave the ground bare and so what provisions will be made to keep silt and mud from flowing into the system while grass is becoming established. All of the features I mention here were shown in the design for this property done by Dan Ojala of Down Cape. There should also be a letter or statement from Eco-Tech certifying the design and performance. My point is that you and I and the town must make reasonable efforts to be assured the Eco-Tech plan will perform properly before it is installed. Finally when will the work be done? Please email the information to me or I can go to your office to pick it up. Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 1:15 PM To: Bob McKechnie(robert.mckechnie@town.barnstab le.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <Paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: We are sorry to report there is still no dry well construction activity at 22 Burning Tree. To put this into context Mr Waluck has had over 2 years too comply with town regulations and now he is almost 2 months beyond the June 15, 2016 completion date ordered in your Certified Letter of April 15, 2016. There is no excuse for this continued delay— Mr Waluck's email below clearly shows no urgency and borders on insult. We would like to meet with you and Mr. Roma at your earliest convenience. Please give us a call at 508-733-1010 or an email to set up a date. We are copying Phil Wallace in the hopes that he can join us for the meeting. Many thanks, Joe and Nancy Gill From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] Sent:Wednesday,July 13, 2016 7:51 AM To:Joe and Nancy Gill<iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: Project 3 Hi Joe, Still planning on investing in the drainage project. Our engineer is very busy'and slow, but is getting closer to completion. I'll send email when I know more. Bruce i 4 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 12:10 PM To: Perry,Tom Cc: Phil Wallace; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Tom: Further to my email below I would like to mention 3'other concerns that I have. First, I have a "Site and Sewerage Disposal System Plan" dated 6-29-2013 which shows named and located landscape plantings along the front and right side of the house - as of today no plantings are in place. Item 2, the rear yard lawn is not being mowed and has weeds about a foot tall including weeds in the collection trough above the dry well — I am not sure if this is an occupancy issue. And item 3, following rain storms and when the roads and lawns have dried out there is a flow of water coming from a rock pile at the right front corner of the property— the water may be coming from a sump pump which I believe is contrary to regulations. I should add that the water then flows across the entrance to my driveway and will be an ice hazard in the winter. Has a date been set for the final inspection? Thanks and Regards, Joe Gill From:Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Tuesday,August 18,2015 3:51 PM ` To:Thomas Perry (thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us) <thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip_n_waIlace@hotmail.com>; Bob McKechnie (robe rt.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Tom: I understand in talking to Bob McKechnie yesterday that you will be conducting a final occupancy inspection at 22 Burning Tree sometime over the next few weeks. I would like to be, present for that inspection, and so please advise me of the time and date. I am very concerned about the surface runoff from the rear yard of 22 Burning Tree. The drywell that was installed is not connected to surface runoff from the rear yard and the runoff continues to flow into our yard. Bob asked Mr Waluck for a drywell plan and it appears no plan was provided as there is no plan in the file. I would like a copy of that plan when it is produced. I believe the drywell is too small. In a separate email I will send you the plan I paid for that was executed by Dan Ojala of Down Cape Engineering. Dan's plan is substantially larger and it has a clean out which Mr Waluck does not have. I am asking that Mr Waluck connect the surface runoff to the drywell. Then we need to observe .what happens in a heavy rainstorm. To be fair that test should occur once we have a few rainstorms so that the ground which is extremely 1 dry now returns to normal moisture and runoff conditions. Please let me know if this is agreeable.to you before a final occupancy permit is granted. Ever since the lot was cleared, every time it rains I have observed hundreds of gallons of water flow into my yard. This water damages the trees and shrubs along the property line and potentially will undermine the foundation of my barn. The water runs through my property and then into the adjacent marsh. This problem can be solved with a properly designed drywell that can be periodically cleaned. I hope that we will soon have a functioning drywell system in operation. Thanks and Regards, Joe Gill 508-733-1010 From: Mckechnie, Robert [mailto:Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] - ��- Sent: Monday,August 17, 2015 9:34 AM To:Joe<iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Hi Joe, There is a temporary occupancy permit for the property at 22 Burning Tree Road per the Commissioner's (Tom Perry) approval. A full occupancy certificate will not be issued until the Commissioner does a final inspection. Tom is away this week and will arrange for a final inspection with the owners when he returns. Have a good day, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 -----Original Message----- From: Joe [mailto:josephgillocomcast.net] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 8:50 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: I trust a Certificate of Occupancy has not been issued yet. The Walucks were living in the house this past weekend. I am not savvy on the regulations so my question is whether this is a violation? The front downspouts were recently connected to the drywell. The rear downspouts were previously connected. However my major concern is that the principal source of runoff from the rear lawn is still not connected to the drywell. Thanks . and regards, Joe From: Mckechnie, Robert [mailto:Robert.McKecb.nie(i,town_barnstable.ma.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 8:16 AM To: Joe <joseph.gil.lncomcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Good Morning Joe, 2 No occupancy permit has been requested or issued for 22 Burning Tree as of this date. The final inspections have not been requested as of today and therefore have not been performed yet. Thanks for the update, Bob -----Original Message----- From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:09 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: I'm checking in with you to see if the Walucks are at the point of asking for an occupancy permit. The rear downspouts are connected to the drywell—but the rear yard runoff is not going to the drywell and continues to run onto our property. Thanks and regards, Joe f a . 'f 3 . Page 1 of 4 Anderson, Robin From: Joe Uosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 5:01 PM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; philip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert; Anderson, Robin Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr. Scali: Over the past few days Mr. Waluck has installed a runoff detention area and a circular grate which appears to lead to a drywell. Our thanks to you and the town officials above who have brought about this enforcement action. We very much appreciate the town's involvement and we hope very soon to see a stop to the runoff. The final test of compliance will come when grass is established in the detention area and we have a substantial rain storm Regards, Joe & Nancy Gill From:Scali, Richard [ma ilto:Richard.ScaIi@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Thursday,August 25, 2016 2:06 PM To:josephgill@comcast.net Cc:Weil, Ruth <Ruth.Weil@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Ells, Mark<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma.us>; philip_n_waIlace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul <Paul.Roma @town.barnstable.ma.us>; Mckechnie, Robert <Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Gill: This is in response to your inquiry to Councilor Wallace which was forwarded to Mark Ells. I have consulted with Paul Roma and Bob McKechnie on the work they have done on this matter. Just as a brief synopsis, which I am sure you are familiar with on this matter, began in Nov. 2014. You met with Commissioner Perry, we received photos, a plan was prepared at your expense on the run-off from Mr. Waluck's new home construction at 22 Burning Tree. In April, 2015, you informed us that the run-off continued. A final inspection was to take place August 2015 only after the run-off was eliminated. A temporary occupancy certificate was issued due to hardship. Between Oct. 2015-Dec. 2015, there were numerous phone calls and emails, whereby the run-off had lessened but still existed after attempts to contain.The temporary certificate expired Dec. 2015. In April 2016,a certified letter was sent to Mr. Waluck and emails stating no additional temporary certificates would be issued until the run-off was eliminated. Eco Tech visited the Building Dept in May,'2016 to discuss a containment plan. On Aug 8, 2016 a final plan was received'from Eco Tech with many emails and calls back and forth on the design. On August 24, 2016, a Notice of Violation was sent out to Mr. Waluck stating that all work necessary to satisfy, the Certificate of Occupancy must be completed by Sept 30, 2016 or he will be subject to fines. We hope that this letter will get the final plan to us with the necessary details for containment. If not,fines will begin.Thank you for your patience on this matter. 9/14/2016 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 2:30 PM To: Perry,Tom Cc: Phil Wallace; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Tom: I see no work being done to connect the surface runoff to the dry well. I am hopeful this will be fixed before construction gets held up by the winter and of course before we face more runoff from the winter storms. I am sending you a photo from my iphone — it shows the collection area, still not connected or tested and overgrown with weeds. When does the temporary occupancy permit expire?Thanks and Regards, Joe Gill From:Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Thursday,August 27, 2015 12:10 PM To:Thomas Perry(thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us)<thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip_n_wallace@hotmail.com>; Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Tom: Further to my email below I would like to mention 3 other concerns that I have. First, I have a "Site and Sewerage Disposal System Plan" dated 6-29-2013 which shows named and located landscape plantings along the front and right side of the house — as of today no plantings are in place. Item 2, the rear yard lawn is not being mowed and has weeds about a foot tall including weeds in the collection trough above the dry well — I am not sure if this is an occupancy issue. And item 3, following rain storms and when the roads and lawns have dried out there is a flow of water coming from a rock pile at the right front corner of the property— the water may be coming from a sump pump which I believe is contrary to regulations. I should add that the water then flows across the entrance to my driveway and will be an ice hazard in the winter. Has a date been set for the final inspection? Thanks and Regards, Joe Gill From:Joe [mailto:iosephpill@«comcast.net] Sent:Tuesday, August 18, 2015 3:51 PM To:-Thomas Perry (thomas.perrv@town.barnstable.ma.us) <thomas.perrv@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<Philip n wallace@hotmail.com>; Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robe rt.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree 1 i Tom: I understand in talking to Bob McKechnie yesterday that you will be conducting a final occupancy inspection at 22 Burning Tree sometime over the next few weeks. I would like to be present for that inspection, and so please advise me of the time and date. I am very concerned about the surface runoff from the rear yard of 22 Burning Tree. The drywell that was installed is not connected to surface runoff from the rear yard and the runoff continues to flow into our yard. Bob asked Mr Waluck for a drywell plan and it appears no plan was provided as there is no plan in the file. I would like a copy of that plan when it is produced. I believe the drywell is too small. In a separate email I will send you the plan I paid for that was executed by Dan Ojala of Down Cape Engineering. Dan's plan is substantially larger and it has a clean out which Mr Waluck does not have. I am asking that Mr Waluck connect the surface runoff to the drywell. Then we need to observe what happens in a heavy rainstorm. To be fair that test should occur once we have a few rainstorms so that the ground which is extremely dry now returns to normal moisture and runoff conditions. Please let me know if this is agreeable to you before a final occupancy permit is granted. Ever since the lot was cleared, every time it rains I have observed hundreds of gallons of water flow into my yard. This water damages the trees and shrubs along the property line and potentially will undermine the foundation of my barn. The water runs through my property and then into the adjacent marsh. This problem can be solved with a properly designed drywell that can be periodically cleaned. I hope that we will soon have a functioning drywell system in operation. Thanks and Regards, Joe Gill 508-733-1010 From: Mckechnie, Robert [ma i Ito:Robe rt.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 9:34 AM To:Joe<josephgill@comcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Hi Joe, There is a temporary occupancy permit for the property at 22 Burning Tree Road per the Commissioner's (Tom Perry) approval. A full occupancy certificate will not be issued until the Commissioner does a final inspection. Tom is away this week and will arrange for a final inspection with the owners when he returns. j Have a good day, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 r 508-862-4033 -----Original Message----- From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 8:50 AM 2 I To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject:.22 Burning Tree Bob: I trust a Certificate of Occupancy has not been issued yet. The Walucks were living in the house this past weekend. I am not savvy on the regulations so my question is whether this is a violation? The front downspouts were recently connected to the drywell. The rear downspouts were previously connected. However my major concern is that the principal source of runoff from the rear lawn is still not connected to the drywell. Thanks and regards, Joe From: Mckechnie, Robert [mail.to:.Robert.McKechni.e@town.barnstable..ma.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 8:16 AM To: Joe <josepbgi.11ncomcast..net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Good Morning Joe, No occupancy permit has been requested or issued for 22 Burning Tree as of this date. The final inspections have not been requested as of today and therefore have not been performed yet. Thanks for the update, Bob -----Original Message----- From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:09 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: I'm checking in with you to see if the Walucks are at the point of asking for an occupancy permit. The rear downspouts are connected to the drywell—but the rear yard runoff is not going to the drywell and continues to run onto our property. Thanks and regards, Joe f i 3 I i Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2015 12:47 PM To: Perry,Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Waluck Attachments: October 2, 2015 015 jpg; October 2, 2015 017 (2)jpg Tom: We had light to heavy rains for 3 days ending on 10/2/2015; this was a test of the runoff violation and dry well system at 22 Burning Tree.THE BOTTOM LINE: a heavy flow of surface water continues to run from#22 onto our property-the rear yard surface water flows right through Mr.Waluck's collection trough on our common property line and then onto our property. The trough is porous so it can't collect water and direct it to the dry well.The trough needs a redesign and rebuild. I am attaching photos taken on 10/2 showing the 2 points where most of the water flows onto our property. In a separate email I will send a video taken on 10/2.The Walucks are enjoying the use of their home while the runoff problem has still not been resolved and we are fearful of further damage to our property during the winter storm season.Thanks and Regards,Joe Gill PS: In the photos the grassy areas are Waluck property-the dark mulch,shrubs and trees are Gill property. October 2, 2015 015 October 2, 2015 017 (2) I A t ' 4 r - fi '�£�� i =• ' y ia+—ens . I 7 i• sum• ' �x,4 .{" t co 4t {. k ' f I rQ I Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe Oosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 1:23 PM To: Perry, Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Waluck Tom: I note that the Waluck Temporary Occupancy Permit Expires on 10/10/2015. I urge you to not extend this permit until Mr Waluck corrects the runoff problem that has gone on since April of 2014 (18 months! ) . I think the information in the email below is important and useful and ask that you add this to the file for 22 Burning Tree. Thanks and Regards, Joe Gill -----Original Message----- From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2015. 12 :47 PM To: Thomas Perry (thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us) <thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace <philip_n_wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Waluck Tom: We had light to heavy rains for 3 days ending on 10/2/2015; this was a test of the runoff violation and dry well system at 22 Burning Tree. THE BOTTOM LINE: a heavy flow of surface water continues to run from ##22 onto our property - the rear yard surface water flows right through Mr. Waluck's collection trough on our common c property line and then onto our property. The trough is'Porous so it can't collect water 'z and direct it to the dry well. The trough needs a redesign and rebuild. I am attaching photos taken on 10/2 showing the 2 points where most of the water flows onto our property. In a separate email I will send a video taken on 10/2. The Walucks are enjoying the use of their home while the runoff problem has still not been resolved and we are fearful of further damage to our property during the winter storm season. Thanks and Regards, Joe Gill PS: In the photos the grassy areas are Waluck property - the dark mulch, shrubs and trees are Gill property. October 2, 2015 015 October 2, 2015 017 (2) Olt?0 - 1 i Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 1:23 PM To: Perry, Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Waluck Tom: I note that the Waluck Temporary Occupancy Permit Expires on 10/10/2015. 1 urge you to not extend this permit until Mr Waluck corrects the runoff problem that has gone on since April of 2014(18 months!). I think the information in the email below is important and useful and ask that you add this to the file for 22 Burning Tree.Thanks and Regards,Joe Gill -----Original Message----- From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2015 12:47 PM To:Thomas Perry(thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us) <thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robe rt.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree-Waluck Tom: We had light to heavy rains for 3 days ending on 10/2/2015;this was a test of the runoff violation and dry well system at 22 Burning Tree.THE BOTTOM LINE: a heavy flow of surface water continues to run from#22 onto our property-the rear yard surface water flows right through Mr. Waluck's collection trough on our common property line and then onto our property. The trough is porous so it can't collect water and direct it to the dry well.The trough needs a redesign and rebuild. I am attaching photos taken on 10/2 showing the 2 points where most of the water flows onto our property. In a separate email I will send a video taken on 10/2.The Walucks are enjoying the use of their home while the runoff problem has still not been resolved and we are fearful of further damage to our property during the winter storm season.Thanks and Regards,Joe Gill PS: In the photos the grassy areas are Waluck property-the dark mulch,shrubs and trees are Gill property. October 2, 2015 015 October 2, 2015 017 (2) F 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 9:32 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Perry, Tom; Phil Wallace Subject: FW:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan - 22 Burning Tree Attachments: 14-350 DRAINAGE REPAIR 11x17 (1).pdf Bob: I just spoke with Tom Perry re 22 Burning Tree and he asked me to give you a call and I just left a message on your line. I have some thoughts re how to fix this and towards that end I am attaching the repair plan that Dan Ojala did in December 2014. 1 am asking that the town require Mr Waluck to obtain a professionally designed solution to the runoff problem — something similar to what Dan Ojala has done. I think you will agree that if this were an electrical or structural problem Mr Waluck would not be allowed to design and install his own solution. Based on the last 2 storms I know the system that is in place now does not work. Regards, Joe From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:down,cape@downcape.com] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe' <iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Joe: Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. The design if for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering, inc. 939 Main St. Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 ; 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com 1 This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. I 2 i Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:36 PM To: Bruce &Susan Waluck Cc: Perry,Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan - 22 Burning Tree Attachments: 14-350 DRAINAGE REPAIR 11x17 (1).pdf Bruce: i I am attaching a drainage repair plan for the runoff problem on your.property—the plan was done by Dan Ojala of Down Cape Engineering—this is the same plan that I sent to you several months ago. On October 12 you told me you plan to work immediately on a final fix to the runoff problem. I truly want you to succeed. Before you do anything I strongly urge you to contact Dan Ojala (or another professional engineer) to advise you on exactly how to proceed. You have a drywell of your own design and Dan will be able to advise you if and how that system can satisfactorily function. You have no provision for periodic clean out— as it stands the system will plug up and you and I will be at this again. The water runoff looked clear to me during last week's storm, but if there is still some silt, Dan's plan will collect it without damaging the dry well — see comments below. You have installed 2 drywell systems of your own design and neither has worked. Trial and error is not the right approach; it's time get professional help. Finally I want this to be "on the record" and so I am sending a copy of this email and the attachment to you via certified mail return receipt. Regards, Joe From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe'<iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Joe: i Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. _ The design if for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS 1 down cape engineering, inc. 939 Main St.Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. i Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 4:09 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Perry,Tom; Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Bob: Just a short note to let you know that nothing is happening at 22 Burning Tree relative to correcting the runoff. The drywell is not connected and of course no rainy day test has been performed to see if it performs and has adequate capacity. I hope Mr Waluck will act soon i before winter weather makes work impossible. Regards, Joe r Mckechnie, Robert From: Waluck, Bruce <bruce.waluck@philips.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:36 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Susan Waluck Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Attachments: French Drain.docx Hi Bob, See attached pictures in the MS WORD file. Please scroll DOWN to see all 5 pictures. We just finished installing a 50 foot FRENCH DRAIN into a 11 foot deep DRYWELL along the Gill property lot line. The drywell was installed over a year ago but was covered over until now. It's a 48" x 48" hole, 11 feet deep, filled with crushed stone and TWO 10ft PVC drain pipes (to the sand below). Now that the lawn is established --we located the drywell and decided to tap into it. The French drain is lined (bottom and backside) with POND LINER material. It contains a 4 inch perforated drain pipe to a drywell barrel sitting in the crushed stone pit. Filter fabric and crushed stone covers the perforated pipe. A cover can easily be removed to clean out the barrel if needed. We're looking for a permanent occupancy permit—can you check out the installation? Bruce I - 1 The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law.The message is intended solely for the addressee(s).If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any use,forwarding,dissemination,or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. r �.�� �� �; ,� . .�� �� � s ��yy e Ppy�+�l rl'��I,I+� ICI P —�., fi '�ffi.. l e ti Fay' �� , �'� 1`, +� �" �•�. �� � a r�, LW a Odll� 1 �yf jcl Ar �ic..C'"�``�}�""`F a-, < �"� �i�:�;� ,AR�,T,,,�dad.->�',{• a � ,�,... � �� _ � `�'��.e� L-',A, �„ �*C3 �,z - ' �jy t `{ pNi pile„j f 3 i x F +w v a ram- . All ffi• k e NOW x v� n ti t :�� a„,. .. ;�' „+�a�- �� �:.. ,� �'� y�'�.:e*'°'4E'fi �• _�.. ter.� ��, ARK w5 , i _ e =y x o e v w a s Via- jg ' , y � fg i r f f` e � stiff, �f teak'� r �, � `c "a I s S r ,aA Page 1 of 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe Dosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, November.16, 2015 5:35 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Perry, Tom; Phil Wallace; radusseault@gmail.com Subject: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff, Bob: Mr. Waluck worked on the dry well this weekend and it appears the system is ready for a test. As you know I have some reservations about the system and so my request is that the test be conducted during a heavy rain storm. I think the collection trough is too small and the gallonage capacity of the dry well tank and washed stone is too small. Also I would like to be present for the test and so please give me a heads up when you plan to come over. I will be traveling in Europe Nov 20 through 30 so if the test occurs then I will send a friend to observe. Please notify me by email which I will be getting while traveling. I sure hope the system works so we can all move on. Thanks, Joe 11/17/2015 I Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 5:35 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Perry,Tom; Phil Wallace; radusseault@gmail.com Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Bob: Mr. Waluck worked on the dry well this weekend and it appears the system is ready for a test. As you know I have some reservations about the system and so my request is that the test be conducted during a heavy rain storm. I think the collection trough is too small and the gallonage capacity of the dry well tank and washed stone is too small. Also I would like to be present for the test and so please give me a heads up when you plan to come over. I will be traveling in Europe Nov 20 through 30 so if the test occurs then I will send a friend to observe. Please notify me by email which I will be getting while traveling. I sure hope the system works so we can all move on. Thanks, Joe 1 Page 1 of 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe Uosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 11:44 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Perry, Tom Subject: 22 Burning Tree-Today Bob: We had a moderate rain today. The bottom line is that changes that Mr Waluck made last weekend are not functioning. The dry well does collect some water , possibly 10% of the volume —the bulk of the water continues to run onto my property. A much wider and deeper collection trough is needed. Most of the water seeps through the berm. I have photos that I will send later. Regards, Joe Gill 11/20/2015 R e}. r t' 41 M _ iL r° Alv ilk • .t ice• �' � t I. _ I � i{ �i ,, � ,�,; , x' r.r.;.h*� � '�• ��(`'9'i `� ''',}�,*� �� 4- �� �s � � +'�'1 '.�� �"+. �` `'��F i '�. a v+� ai4ps ,� �' •.� {- "�- 1 :�, Ar.a._y ryes,�h, �:��. tir 7 :"�. :..p.'•.I •� '' ' , tF� ~ •..�, _ - Ar - 04 4p lb .P �.�e i f:i�. ��� M .yPt; ''��� -f '� ef•'�'r, "*.''•". �?`��f^c _'� �y�A — •�+. !� 'P, I L '��'• � `�� '�..^�- F;! .p ,~.a-J"I�-c,r l��I ...� ,�,.'�i�.. - �I+ v!"� '�`t 1��.' r' ,.s�� . y 5 •-+t' � r Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgiII@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 11:44 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Perry,Tom Subject: 22 Burning Tree -Today Bob: We had a moderate rain today. The bottom line is that changes that Mr Waluck made last weekend are not functioning. The dry well does collect some water , possibly 10% of the volume —the bulk of the water continues to run onto my property. A much wider and deeper collection trough is needed. Most of the water seeps through the berm. I have photos that I will send later. Regards, Joe Gill r i - M Ilk n X 40 Jo V - � v;p 1� ip, ��t ' _ S d '" tom, u• � n�.� �k µ �.r - - - �-0 AG n'g ;i Alle 1� * i0'V -1 A dlW _ 1 a Mckechnie, Robert From: josephgill <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 12:08 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 11-20-2015 rain storm - 22 Burning Tree Attachments: IMG_1304.JPG;ATT331726.txt Small amount of water going to dry well but most of water still coming onto my property-water not getting into plastic and stone trough-wider and deeper trough needed -water is collected in grass to right of plastic-most of water seeps thru berm onto my property-Joe 1 Is 4� lip - i IL 41, � �� ` �i1 .ir� �`. .5,� r .6�-`b+ "ty �F � t F�..; r�� -#� �•,Y �� _r� �F � � — •.� �,�F �,�`v . ,� �_•,;. .�f� � .,.6i�'6`-.�(^.a��. , r � �, �`� �. � YLi. �M � b l :. �b d+�• "�' 4f s �•� J: �, ,. y _. - - Mckechnie, Robert From: josephgill <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:54 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 burning tree Bob- I am having email problems and so please let me know if you got my messages today advising dry well did not work during today's storm -thanks,Joe Sent from my Whone i f Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 4:26 PM To: josephgill' Subject: RE: 22 burning tree Hi Joe, The emails (and pics)were received,thanks. We will be in contact with Bruce next week. Bob -----Original Message----- From:josephgill [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:54 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 burning tree Bob- I am having email problems and so please let me know if you got my messages today advising dry well did not work during today's storm-thanks,Joe Sent from my iPhone I 1 1 � �I Mckechnie, Robert From: josephgill <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2015 11:17 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: 22 burning tree Bob: Excellent. I think to work the plastic sheet must be 2 or 3 times wider and be tucked under the uphill turf- otherwise the water seeps thru the berm and onto my land. Nancy and I are in Paris (yes Paris) until Nov 30 but I am guessing there won't be a final test for a while until Bruce does some more.work.Thanks,Joe Sent from my iPhone >On Nov 20, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Mckechnie, Robert<Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>wrote: > Hi Joe, >The emails(and pics)were received,thanks. We will be in contact >with Bruce next week. > Bob >-----Original Message----- > From:josephgill [mailto:iosephpill@comcast.net] >Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:54 PM >To: Mckechnie, Robert >Subject: 22 burning tree > > Bob- I am having email problems and so please let me know if you got > my messages today advising dry well did not work during today's storm >-thanks,Joe >Sent from my iPhone Page 1 of 2 Mckechnie, Robert From: Waluck, Bruce [bruce.waluck@philips.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:23 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Susan Waluck Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, There was a significant rain event in West Barnstable on Sunday— 1.5 inches. We observed that after six hours there was no evidence of streaming water flowing from our property to the Gill land. The 50 foot French drain into the drywell stops any perceptible water flow into the neighboring yard. Water build-up along the Gill's grass edge is flowing from a bare surface area of 50 x 17 feet on the Gill property itself. Our temporary occupancy permit is about to expire on December 10. We would like to get our permanent occupancy permit. Bruce From: Waluck, Bruce Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:36 AM To: Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us Cc: Susan Waluck Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, See attached pictures in the MS WORD file. Please scroll DOWN to see all 5 pictures. We just finished installing a 50 foot FRENCH DRAIN into a 11 foot deep DRYWELL along the Gill property lot line. The drywell was installed over a year ago but was covered over until now. It's a 48" x 48" hole, 11 feet deep, filled with crushed stone and TWO 10ft PVC drain pipes (to the sand below). Now that the lawn is established --we located the drywell and decided to tap into it. The French drain is lined (bottom and backside)with POND LINER material. It contains a 4 inch perforated drain pipe to a drywell barrel sitting in the crushed stone pit. Filter fabric and crushed stone covers the perforated pipe. A cover can easily be removed to clean out the barrel if needed. 11/24/2015 Page 2 of 2 We're looking for a permanent occupancy permit—can you check out the installation? Bruce The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law.The message is intended solely for the addressee(s).If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any use,forwarding,dissemination,or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. r 11/24/2015 Page 1 of 2 Mckechnie, Robert From: Waluck, Susan [Susan.Waluck@fmr.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 1:46 PM To: Waluck, Bruce; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, Are you open on Friday 11/27? We would like to come in for the permit. Happy Thanksgiving! Susan From: Waluck, Bruce [mailto:bruce.waluck@philips.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:23 PM To: Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us Cc: Waluck, Susan Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, There was a significant rain event in West Barnstable on Sunday— 1.5 inches. We observed that after six hours there was no evidence of streaming water flowing from our property to the Gill land. The 50 foot French drain into the drywell stops any perceptible water flow into the neighboring yard. Water build-up along the Gill's grass edge is flowing from a bare surface area of 50 x 17 feet on the Gill property itself. Our temporary occupancy permit is about to expire on December 10. We would like to get our permanent occupancy permit. Bruce From: Waluck, Bruce Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:36 AM To: Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us Cc: Susan Waluck Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, See attached pictures in the MS WORD file. 11/24/2015 . Page 2 of 2 Please scroll DOWN to see all 5 pictures. We just finished installing a 50 foot FRENCH DRAIN into a 11 foot deep DRYWELL along the Gill property lot line. The drywell was installed over a year ago but was covered over until now. It's a 48" x 48" hole, 11 feet deep, filled with crushed stone and TWO 10ft PVC drain pipes (to the sand below). Now that the lawn is established --we located the drywell and decided to tap into it. The French drain is lined (bottom and backside) with POND LINER material. It contains a 4 inch perforated drain pipe to a drywell barrel sitting in the crushed stone pit. Filter fabric and crushed stone covers the perforated pipe. A cover can easily be removed to clean out the barrel if needed. We're looking for a permanent occupancy permit—can you check out the installation? Bruce The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law.The message is intended solely for the addressee(s).If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any use,forwarding,dissemination,or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 11/24/2015 Mckechnie, Robert From: Waluck, Susan <Susan.Waluck@fmr.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 1:46 PM To: Waluck, Bruce; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, Are you open on Friday 11/27? We would like to come in for the permit. Happy Thanksgiving! Susan From: Waluck, Bruce [mailto:bruce.waluck(oDphilips.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:23 PM To: Robert.McKechnieatown.barnstable.ma.us Cc: Waluck, Susan Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, There was a significant rain event in West Barnstable on Sunday—1.5 inches. We observed that after six hours there was no evidence of streaming water flowing from our property to the Gill land. The 50 foot French drain into the drywell stops any perceptible water flow into the neighboring yard. Water build-up along the Gill's grass edge is flowing from a bare surface area of 50 x 17 feet on the Gill property itself. Our temporary occupancy permit is about to expire on December 10. We would like to get our permanent occupancy permit. Bruce From: Waluck, Bruce Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:36 AM To: Robert.McKechnieatown.barnstable.ma.us Cc: Susan Waluck Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, See attached pictures in the MS WORD file. 1 Please scroll DOWN to see all 5 pictures. We just finished installing a 50 foot FRENCH DRAIN into a 11 foot deep DRYWELL along the Gill property lot line. The drywell was installed over a year ago but was covered over until now. It's a 48" x 48" hole, 11 feet deep, filled with crushed stone and TWO 10ft PVC drain pipes (to the sand below). Now that the lawn is established --we located the drywell and decided to tap into it. The French drain is lined (bottom and backside) with POND LINER material. It contains a 4 inch perforated drain pipe to a drywell barrel sitting in the crushed stone pit. Filter fabric and crushed stone covers the perforated pipe. A cover can easily be removed to clean out the barrel if needed. We're looking for a permanent occupancy permit—can you check out the installation? Bruce The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law.The message is intended solely for the addressee(s).If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any use,forwarding.dissemination,or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ' - 2 Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 4:29 PM To: 'Waluck, Bruce' Cc: 'susan.waluck@fmr.com'; Perry, Tom Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE I Good Afternoon Bruce, As you are aware, the commissioner must make a decision on this matter. Unfortunately, he is out of the office until next week. Therefore, a permanent CO won't be issued until he is satisfied that your issue is resolved. We have received emails with pictures from your neighbor Joe Gill stating that the water is still flowing and showing water on his land. I have been trying to attach copies to this email but have not been successful. I will try tomorrow, again, and hopefully send at least one so that you can see where this occurs. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Waluck, Bruce [mailto:bruce.waluck@philips.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:23 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Susan Waluck Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, There was a significant rain event in West Barnstable on Sunday— 1.5 inches. We observed that after six hours there was no evidence of streaming water flowing from our property to the Gill land. The 50 foot French drain into the drywell stops any perceptible water flow into the neighboring yard. Water build-up along the Gill's grass edge is flowing from a bare surface area of 50 x 17 feet on the Gill property itself. Our temporary occupancy permit is about to expire on December 10. We would like to get our permanent occupancy permit. Bruce From: Waluck, Bruce Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:36 AM To: Robert.McKech nie(cbtown.barnstable.ma.us Cc: Susan Waluck Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, 1 •-` See attached pictures in the MS WORD file. Please scroll DOWN to see all 5 pictures. We just finished installing a 50 foot FRENCH DRAIN into a 11 foot deep DRYWELL along the Gill property lot line. The drywell was installed over a year ago but was covered over until now. It's a 48" x 48" hole, 11 feet deep, filled with crushed stone and TWO 10ft PVC drain pipes (to the sand below). Now that the lawn is established -- we located the drywell and decided to tap into it. The French drain is lined (bottom and backside) with POND LINER material. It contains a 4 inch perforated drain pipe to a drywell barrel sitting in the crushed stone pit. Filter fabric and crushed stone covers the perforated pipe. A cover can easily be removed to clean out the barrel if needed. We're looking for a permanent occupancy permit—can you check out the installation? Bruce The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law.The message is intended solely for the addressee(s).If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any use,forwarding,dissemination,or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ' 2 Mckechnie, Robert From: Waluck, Susan <Susan.Waluck@fmr.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:20 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert;Waluck, Bruce Cc: Perry, Tom Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, thanks forgetting back to us. Joe Gill sent us the pictures as well so don't worry about getting them to US. We are sure that the water is falling from the sky onto his yard and running downhill to a low spot. This has nothing to do with us and we are not responsible for disposing of the Gill's rain water. The French drain we installed on the line is adequate for the runoff from our yard. Anything further is just not necessary and we want our permit when Tom is next available. Thank you and we appreciate your patience in this matter. Susan and Bruce Waluck From: Mckechnie, Robert [mailto:Robert.McKechnie(c town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 4:29 PM To: Waluck, Bruce Cc: Waluck, Susan; Perry, Tom Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Good Afternoon Bruce, As you are aware, the commissioner must make a decision on this matter. Unfortunately, he is out of the office until next week. Therefore, a permanent CO won't be issued until he is satisfied that your issue is resolved. We have received emails with pictures from your neighbor Joe Gill stating that the water is still flowing and showing water on his land. I have been trying to attach copies to this email but have not been successful. I will try tomorrow, again, and hopefully send at least one so that you can see where this occurs. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Waluck, Bruce [mailto:bruce.waluck(d)philips.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:23 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Susan Waluck Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, There was a significant rain event in West Barnstable on Sunday— 1.5 inches. We observed that after six hours there was no evidence of streaming water flowing from our property to the Gill land. 1 i The 50 foot French drain into the drywell stops any perceptible water flow into the neighboring yard. Water build-up along the Gill's grass edge is flowing from a bare surface area of 50 x 17 feet on the Gill property itself. Our temporary occupancy permit is about to expire on December 10. We would like to get our permanent occupancy permit. Bruce From: Waluck, Bruce Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:36 AM To: Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us Cc: Susan Waluck Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, See attached pictures in the MS WORD file. Please scroll DOWN to see all 5 pictures. We just finished installing a 50 foot FRENCH DRAIN into a 11 foot deep DRYWELL along the Gill property lot line. The drywell was installed over a year ago but was covered over until now. It's a 48" x 48" hole, 11 feet deep, filled with crushed stone and TWO 10ft PVC drain pipes (to the sand below). Now that the lawn is established --we located the drywell and decided to tap into it. The French drain is lined (bottom and backside) with POND LINER material. It contains a 4 inch perforated drain pipe to a drywell barrel sitting in the crushed stone pit. Filter fabric and crushed stone covers the perforated pipe. A cover can easily be removed to clean out the barrel if needed. We're looking for a permanent occupancy permit—can you check out the installation? Bruce 2 r The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law.The message is intended solely for the addressee(s).If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any use,forwarding,dissemination,or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.if you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 3 I Mckechnie, Robert From: Waluck, Bruce <bruce.waluck@philips.com> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 10:23 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Perry, Tom;Waluck, Susan Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob and Tom, We're going to have 90%chance of rain on Wednesday. Would it be possible for you to visit the site on Wednesday? Bruce From: Waluck, Susan [mailto:Susan.Waluck(a)fmr.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:20 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Waluck, Bruce Cc: Perry,Tom Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, thanks for getting back to us. Joe Gill sent us the pictures as well so don't worry about getting them to US. We are sure that the water is falling from the sky onto his yard and running downhill to a low spot. This has nothing to do with us and we are not responsible for disposing of the Gill's rain water. The French drain we installed on the line is adequate for the runoff from our yard. Anything further is just not necessary and we want our permit when Tom is next available. Thank you and we appreciate your patience in this matter. Susan and Bruce Waluck From: Mckechnie, Robert [mailto:Robert.McKechnieO)town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 4:29 PM To: Waluck, Bruce Cc: Waluck, Susan; Perry, Tom Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Good Afternoon Bruce, As you are aware, the commissioner must make a decision on this matter. Unfortunately, he is out of the office until next week. Therefore, a permanent CO won't be issued until he is satisfied that your issue is resolved. We have received emails with pictures from your neighbor Joe Gill stating that the water is still flowing and showing water on his land. I have been trying to attach copies to this email but have not been successful. I will try tomorrow, again, and hopefully send at least one so that you can see where this occurs. Bob 1 r -----Original Message----- jFrom: Waluck, Bruce [mailto:bruce.waluck(a>philips.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:23 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Susan Waluck Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, There was a significant rain event in West Barnstable on Sunday—1.5 inches. We observed that after six hours there was no evidence of streaming water flowing from our property to the Gill land. The 50 foot French drain into the drywell stops any perceptible water flow into the neighboring yard. Water build-up along the Gill's grass edge is flowing from a bare surface area of 50 x 17 feet on the Gill property itself. Our temporary occupancy permit is about to expire on December 10. We would like to get our permanent occupancy permit. Bruce From: Waluck, Bruce Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:36 AM To: Robert.McKechnieO)town.barnstable.ma.us Cc: Susan Waluck ' Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Lane UPDATE Hi Bob, See attached pictures in the MS WORD file. Please scroll DOWN to see all 5 pictures. We just finished installing a 50 foot FRENCH DRAIN into a 11 foot deep DRYWELL along the Gill property lot line. The drywell was installed over a year ago but was covered over until now. It's a 48" x 48" hole, 11 feet deep, filled with crushed stone and TWO 10ft PVC drain pipes (to the sand below). Now that the lawn is established --we located the drywell and decided to tap into it. The French drain is lined (bottom and backside) with POND LINER material. It contains a 4 inch perforated drain pipe to a drywell barrel sitting in the crushed stone pit. Filter fabric and crushed stone covers the perforated pipe. A cover can easily be removed to clean out the barrel if needed. We're looking for a permanent occupancy permit—can you check out the installation? 2 Bruce i The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law.The message is intended solely for the addressee(s).If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any use,forwarding,dissemination,or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 3 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 8:30 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Perry, Tom Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: RE: 22 burning tree Bob:, I believe the 60 day temporary occupancy permit is up this week. Since my Nov 20 email and picts below no further work has been done to correct the problem.Thanks and Regards,Joe I -----Original Message----- From: Mckechnie, Robert [ma i Ito:Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 4:26 PM To:josephgill <]osephgill@comcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 burning tree Hi Joe, The emails(and pics)were received,thanks. We will be in contact with Bruce next week Bob -----Original Message----- From:josephgill [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:54 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 burning tree Bob- I am having email problems and so please let me know if you got my messages today advising dry well did not work during today's storm -thanks,Joe Sent from my iPhone 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Monday, December 28, 2p15 11:52 AM To: Perry, Tom Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane WB ok -----Original Message----- From: Perry, Tom Sent: Monday, December. 28, 2015 11:31 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane WB No.Thursday morning would be best and the rain situation will be more conducive to see what's going on i From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 10:24 AM To: Perry, Tom Subject: 22 Burning Tree Lane WB Tom, Do you have time to inspect the runoff at 22 Burning Tree tomorrow? I will have time in the afternoon. Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:40 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Perry,Tom Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Bob: Still no solution to the runoff problem. Yesterday's storm was a good test. Thanks and Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:30 AM To: Bruce &Susan Waluck(brucewaluck@vahoo.com)<brucewaluck@vahoo.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bruce: We met at our common property line to view the runoff during yesterday's rain storm. What we saw was a considerable flow of water coming from your property across the property line about 8 feet north of the end of the stockade fence. The adjacent mulched areas on my property were flooded as was the adjacent grass. Some water is flowing into your dry well but it was flooded. The plastic trench with stone you installed in November is not collecting water A much larger collection Swale is needed and that Swale needs to extend south to collect the water mentioned in the 2"d sentence above. On Nov 20,2015 1 sent you a message and photo advising that your collection Swale and drywell system were not functioning and considerable water was flowing onto my property. That was 6 weeks ago and in spite of the good weather and your frequent presence at the house you have done nothing to correct this problem. The runoff has continued for nearly 2 years. When are you going to fix it? Joe i is Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 12:02 PM To: 'Bruce Waluck' Subject: Runoff at 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Bruce and Susan, Just a quick email. Tom and I will try to visit the subject property tomorrow am. There may be more rain tonight into tomorrow am. Maybe we will see you then, Bob. Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 20Q Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 1 Page 1 of 2 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe Uosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 4:38 PM To: Perry, Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree -continuing runoff problem Tom: Runoff from 22 Burning Tree has been flowing onto my property for nearly 2 years. Mr. Waluck has had plenty of time to fix the problem. Considering how long this has gone on I am requesting that the town take the next logical step and establish in writing a reasonable deadline to show a functioning drywell system that will last. I appreciate your work on this project and I am sure you too hope we can bring it to an end soon. Thanks and Regards, Joe Gill PS: The storm on Dec 29 that I observed with Mr. Waluck showed 2 facts: 1.) a heavy flow of water onto my property and 2.) some water flows to the drywell but during the storm it flooded proving it-has inadequate capacity. I sent pictures to you and Bob. From:Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:40 AM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Thomas Perry(thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us)<thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Bob: Still no solution to the runoff problem. Yesterday's storm was a good test. Thanks and Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:losephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:30 AM To: Bruce &Susan Waluck(brucewaluck@yahoo.com)<brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bruce: We met at our common property line to view the runoff during yesterday's rain storm. What we saw was a considerable flow of water coming from your property across the property line about 8 feet north of the end of the stockade fence. The adjacent mulched areas on my property were flooded as was the adjacent grass. Some water is flowing into your dry well but it was flooded. The plastic trench with stone you installed in November is not collecting water A much larger collection Swale is needed and that Swale needs to extend south to collect the water mentioned in the 2nd sentence above. 1/4/2016 ram. Page 2 of 2 On Nov 20,2015 1 sent you a message and photo advising that your collection swale and drywell system were not functioning and considerable water was flowing onto my property. That was 6 weeks ago and in spite of the good weather and your frequent presence at the house you have done nothing to correct this problem. The runoff has continued for nearly 2 years. When are you going to fix it? Joe 1/4/2016. Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 4:38 PM To: Perry,Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree - continuing runoff problem Tom: Runoff from 22 Burning Tree has been flowing onto my property for nearly 2 years. Mr. Waluck has had plenty of time to fix the problem. Considering how long this has gone on I am requesting that the town take the next logical step and establish in writing a reasonable deadline to show a functioning drywell system that will last. I appreciate your work on this project and I am sure you too hope we can bring it to an end soon. Thanks and Regards, Joe Gill PS: The storm on Dec 29 that I observed with Mr. Waluck showed 2 facts: 1.) a heavy flow of water onto my property and 2.) some water flows to the drywell but during the storm it flooded proving it, has inadequate capacity. I sent pictures to you and Bob. From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:40 AM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us)<robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>;Thomas Perry(thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us)<thomas.perry@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Bob: Still no solution to the runoff problem. Yesterday's storm was a good test. Thanks and Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:30 AM To: Bruce&Susan Waluck (brucewaluck@yahoo.com)<brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bruce: We met at our'common property line to view the runoff during yesterday's rain storm. What we saw was a considerable flow of water coming from your property across the property line about 8 feet north of the end of the stockade fence. The adjacent mulched areas on my property were flooded as was the adjacent grass. Some water is flowing into your dry well but it was flooded. The plastic trench with stone you installed in November is not collecting water A much larger collection swale is needed and that swale needs to extend south to collect the water mentioned in the 2"d sentence above. On Nov 20,2015 1 sent you a message and photo advising that your collection swale and drywell system were not functioning and considerable water was flowing onto my property. +' That was 6 weeks ago and in spite of the good weather and your frequent presence at the house you have done nothing to correct this problem. The runoff has continued for nearly 2 years. When are you going to fix it? Joe - 2 Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Monday,January 11, 2016 3:42 PM To: 'Waluck, Bruce' Cc: Perry, Tom Subject: RE:ANOTHER FRENCH DRAIN -- 22 Burning Tree Lane Good Afternoon Bruce, The Building Commissioner(Tom Perry) has to verify that your work to control the runoff has worked. Unfortunately, the only way he can do this is to visit the site during a significant rain event. He will not ok or issue an occupancy certificate for the property before he has observed the elimination of excess runoff. You are welcome to stop by the office anytime but I feel it would be more productive to wait'until the Commissioner has approved the site. Thanks for the update, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 -----Original Message----- From: Waluck, Bruce [mailto:bruce.waluck@philips.com] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 2:54 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: McKean, Thomas Subject: ANOTHER FRENCH DRAIN -- 22 Burning Tree Lane Hi Guys, Last week we installed another 50 feet of French drain—and tied it into the large dry-well. The trench is lined with a waterproofing barrier and contains 50ft of 4 inch perforated pipe. See attached picture. I'm looking for an occupancy permit and will be in your office tomorrow morning. It might rain tomorrow afternoon—can you visit? Bruce The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law.The message is intended solely for the ' addressee(s).If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any use,forwarding,dissemination,or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: josephgill <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday,January 14, 2016 4:11 PM To: Perry,Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: philip_n_wallace@hotmail.com Subject: 22 Burning Tree Attachments: 20160108_133744_resized_1 jpg;ATT2017658.txt Gentlemen: Photo of the new collection Swale-email follows shortly-Joe " i Ah • . .. rAA * iij IPL "4* s ti K� Mckechnie. Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday,January 14, 2016 4:11 PM To: Perry, Tom; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Phil Wallace;Josh Blakely Subject: 22 Burning Tree Tom and Bob: Several days ago Mr Waluck put in a 50 foot long by about 10 inch wide swale with small stone which is intended to catch the runoff and direct it to the drywell. I sent you a picture of the trench from my phone. So I believe the next step will be to wait for a good rainstorm to see if this latest alteration will work. When you are planning to head over to inspect the system please give me a call at 508-733-1010 and I will have a friend meet you at the property (I am in Florida for the winter). I have 2 concerns: 1) Does the new swale catch the runoff and keep it from flowing onto my property and 2) Does the drywell have sufficient gallonage capacity to absorb the water or does it overflow after it has rained for a while. I hired Dan Ojala of Down Cape Engineering and he did the calculations - his design calls for a much larger drywell and collection swale. Thanks, Joe 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday,April 09, 2016 12:18 PM To: Perry, Tom Cc: Mckechnie, Robert; Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree -April 7 report Tom: I observed the situation during the rain storm on Thursday April 7. Mr. Waluck's latest effort is not working. The runoff from 22 Burning Tree continues to flow into our yard. The water seems to flow to the top of the drywell but the drywell does not accept the water which then goes right into our yard. The water was 2 or 3 inches deep at spots along the property line. I have some photos which I will send to you from my phone. It's been 2 years— and still no solution. I would appreciate if you or one of the staff would put a copy of this email in the file folder for the property. Best Regards, Joe Gill . 1 r Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 9:58 AM To: 'Bruce Waluck' Subject: Certificate of Occupancy Hi Bruce, The last time we talked I mentioned that you needed to get an extension on your temporary occupancy certificate. However, I checked this morning and see that we don't have a record of you extending it. The temporary occupancy certificate that you have expired on October 10, 2015. You have to get a new Temporary Certificate of Occupancy ASAP or not occupy the residence. The second issue you are well aware of. The complaint of runoff is still active. Your neighbor Joe has contacted us about this problem again and we hope that you are actively pursuing a solution. Call or email with any questions, Thanks, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 i 1 i Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 5:05 PM To: Perry,Tom Cc: Mckechnie, Robert; Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree - meeting Attachments: Meeting with Town 4-14-2016.docx Tom: Many thanks for meeting with us on April 14. Attached is summary of our meeting which is based on my notes and input from Phil and Nancy-- let me know if you see a need for any additions or corrections. If the summary looks OK please add it to the file. 1 will follow up with you in a few days to see how we are progressing towards an engineered solution and a final fix. This flow of mud and water has been going on for 2 years and I think you will agree Nancy and I have been extremely patient—we are hoping this will be the final chapter over the next 30 days. Regards, Joe i Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 9:14 AM To: 'Bruce Waluck' Subject: RE: Certificate of Occupancy Good Morning Bruce, I First, my apologies for your unproductive trip into the office to obtain your extension of the Temporary Occupancy Certificate. Secondly, there is a letter in transit to you via certified mail regarding the ongoing drainage issue. It was sent to the Harvard address as well as the West Barnstable address. The staff was not aware of this letter when they spoke to you today. I will attempt to attach it to a second email so you can review it today. I do not know how successful I will be. Also, I will try to contact you by phone later after I know the email has been sent. Thanks, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck(dyahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 1:20 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: Certificate of Occupancy Hi Bob, see you tomorrow morning at 8:30 Bruce From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie(cDtown.barnstable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck(cDyahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 9:57 AM Subject: Certificate of Occupancy Hi Bruce, The last time we talked I mentioned that you needed to get an extension on your temporary occupancy certificate. However, I checked this morning and see that we don't have a record of you extending it. The temporary occupancy certificate that you have expired on October 10, 2015. You have to get a new Temporary Certificate of Occupancy ASAP or not occupy the residence. The second issue you are well aware of. The complaint of runoff is still active. Your neighbor Joe has contacted us about this problem again and we hope that you are actively pursuing a solution. 1 Call or email with any questions, ' Thanks, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 c 2 i Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 9:16 AM To: 'Bruce Waluck' Subject: Copy of Certified Letter Attachments: Waluck 22 Burning Tree Lane WB ORDER.DOC This is a copy of the letter. The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Waluck 22 Burning Tree Lane WB ORDER .DOC Note:To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 1 k 364- 804 -SEPTIC DESIGN PLANS -PERC TESTS 2 Mappp L COO DAVID COUGHANOM • U 155 Geo Ryder Rd South CIVIL ENGINEER, SENIOR CHATHAM. MA 02633-1621 LICENSED RSOI SANITARIAN EVALUATOR Message Page 1 of 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert -- Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:27 AM To: . 'Bruce Waluck' Subject: Temporary Occupancy Certificate Hi Bruce, I have had a discussion with the commissioner and I would like to pass the information on to you. Regretfully, we will not be issuing another temporary occupancy certificate or an occupancy certificate at this time. Please keep us informed as to your plans and progress on the elimination of the runoff. Thanks, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 y t r 4/21/2616 Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:27 AM To: 'Bruce Waluck' Subject: Temporary Occupancy Certificate Hi Bruce, I have had a discussion with the commissioner and I would like to pass the information on to you. Regretfully, we Will not be issuing another temporary occupancy certificate or an occupancy certificate at this time. Please keep us informed as to your plans and progress on the elimination of the runoff. Thanks, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 C viz ie e-c-T� 711A6 /N�o Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:18 PM To: 'Bruce Waluck' Subject: RE:Temporary Occupancy Certificate Hi Bruce, Thanks for the update. David was in last week or the week before to let me know that he is working on this for you. Please let me know when you get started so that I can come by to see the work. Bob From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck(abyahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:41 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: Temporary Occupancy Certificate Hi Bob, Our original site engineer... David Coughanowr (ECO-TECH) is designing a water containment system for our property. I already have a contractor lined up to do the site work. As soon as David submits a plan to you we'll schedule the work. David is waiting for rain to observe and verify his calculations. The existing two drywells and 150ft of French drains work for rain storms up to 1" but not over that. We'll add additional capacity as soon as David completes his work. Bruce Hi Bruce, I have had a discussion with the commissioner and I would like to pass the information on to you. Regretfully, we will not be issuing another temporary occupancy certificate or an occupancy certificate at this time. Please keep us informed as to your plans and progress on the elimination of the runoff. Thanks, t Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 1 i i From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie(aD-town.barnstable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck(cD-yahoo,.com> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:27 AM Subject: Temporary Occupancy Certificate i 2 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 2:38 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: I stopped in at the town office to check the file and read your excellent certified letter of April 15 to the Walucks. I am in total agreement with the letter and very much appreciate your sending it. I noted that the 2 certified letters were not accepted and returned — how does the town deal with this situation and get notice to Mr Waluck? Has Mr Waluck has given you specifics on the drywell design and when it will be put in? Since Tom has retired are you "in charge" of this project and the person determining when and if the Certificate of Occupancy is granted? Thanks and Regards, Joe . 1 i Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:32 PM To: 'Joe' Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Hi Joe, Mr. Waluck has an engineer working on a plan to contain the runoff. After the engineer is satisfied with the plan the work will start. We have to have faith in the engineer and his design. Mr.Waluck has received the letter. I'll keep you posted, Bob From: Joe [mailto:josephgillacomcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 2:38 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: I stopped in at the town office to check the file and read your excellent certified letter of April 15 to the Walucks. I am in total agreement with the letter and very much appreciate your sending it. I noted that the 2 certified letters were not accepted and returned — how does the town deal with this situation and get notice to Mr Waluck? Has Mr Waluck has given you specifics on the drywell design and when it will be put in? Since Tom has retired are you "in charge" of this project and the person determining when and if the Certificate of Occupancy is granted? Thanks and Regards, Joe Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Monday,June 27, 2016 11:08 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Bob: had this on a 30 day follow up and I'm checking in with you to see what's up. I see no dry well action. A large truck arrived with beds and furniture a few days ago. Thanks and Regards, Joe From: Mckechnie, Robert [mailto:Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:32 PM To:Joe<]osephgill@comcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Hi Joe, Mr. Waluck has an engineer working on a plan to contain the runoff. After the engineer is satisfied with the plan the work will start. We have to have faith in the engineer and his design. Mr.Waluck has received the letter . I'll keep you posted, Bob From: Joe [mailto:josephgill(o)comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 2:38 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree Bob: I stopped in at the town office to check the file and read your excellent certified letter of April 15 to the Walucks. I am in total agreement with the letter and very much appreciate your sending it. I noted that the 2 certified letters were not accepted and returned — how does the town deal with this situation and get notice to Mr Waluck? Has Mr Waluck has given you specifics on the drywell design and when it will be put in? Since Tom has retired are you "in charge" of this project and the person determining when and if the Certificate of Occupancy is granted? Thanks and Regards, Joe 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Monday,August 08, 2016 9:10 AM To: 'Bruce Waluck' Subject: Drainage Plan Good Morning Bruce, Could you forward this email to your engineer Dave so that he can communicate via email with me? I understand that he has a plan that he wants to share. Thanks, v Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 • 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday,July 19, 20161:03 PM ' To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: FW: Project Bob: See Mr Waluck's email below. He is well beyond the town's 60 day time limit that ended on June 15. His email sure doesn't indicate any urgency. I would appreciate your thoughts on forcing some urgency and finally getting this project done. Thanks and Regards, Joe 508-733- 1010 From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] Sent:Wednesday,July 13, 2016 7:51 AM To:Joe and Nancy Gill<ioseghgill@comcast.net> Subject: Project Hi Joe, Still planning on investing in the drainage project. Our engineer is very busy and slow, but is getting closer to completion. I'll send email when I know more. Bruce 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 1:15 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Roma, Paul Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Bob: We are sorry to report there is still no dry well construction activity at 22 Burning Tree. To put this into context Mr Waluck has had over 2 years too comply with town regulations and now he is almost 2 months beyond the June 15, 2016.completion date ordered in your. Certified Letter of April 15, 2016. There is no excuse for this continued delay— Mr Waluck's email below clearly shows no urgency and borders on insult. We would like to meet with you and Mr. Roma at your earliest convenience. Please give us a call at 508-733-1010 or an email to set up a date. We are copying Phil Wallace in the hopes that he can join us for the meeting. Many thanks, Joe and Nancy Gill From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] � Sent:Wednesday,July 13, 2016 7:51 AM 'To:Joe and Nancy Gill<iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: Project Hi Joe, Still planning on investing in the drainage project. Our engineer is very busy and slow, but is getting closer to completion. I'll send email when I know more. Bruce 1 . Mckechnie, Robert From: David <davidcou@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday,August 08, 20161:40 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Attachments: 22_Burning Tree_DR_PL_Prelim3.pdf Good afternoon, My client, Mr Bruce Waluck would like to relandscape the property according to the attached plan. Will any sort of permit be required? j Thanks! David D. Coughanowr Eco-Tech Rapid Response 508 364-0894 • 1 WEST BARNSTABLE. MA 0'p OJPyp? THIS IS A Q N COLOR y PLAN �� NOT USE COLOR PLAN ONLY FOR INSFALLArION 'sx - TO FULL DETAIL IS BEST fq SCALE VIEWED IN q c i FULL COLOR �� ��o,y�ggF•� ", 30 3t 32 1 � 1 x S \. PAllO 24 dmq SEPTIC n. f�. ti TAM ' £ '��ar a I I I r solr scf>E ' W Q ABSORPTION Ppq�� ary 3u \YSTEM gyp, y ,g 6:�®0 /® AREA =35200 if A ietr* / y 3G PLAN BOOK2�A PAGE 107 AssA MAP 136 P�t,�s E PLC e14 nNl p late SCALE: I in = 30 f t n so 60 2,0 PRINT ON II x 17 in PAPER FOR PROPER SCALE PROPOSED RUNOFF DETENTION AREA t— nrr troslor AND DETAIL • SI 7L rr AVID\G� a ( - '..'�•,n t :.. .... - .r ,:'w._: r ..�.::'..'....,,.ue�.' 1COLIOHANOWR t"o 'sl..011;;.li ;•,\ OT.20 If ^ No.1093 Nt.4b1 v ;•. ) i fFG�ERc.O - SECTION A-A S,gMfNNpN Fv<.��. • 27.33 it . .........._..� SECTION B-B T O 5:A L E PROPOSED RUNOFF CONTROL PLAN 1 -TO SERVE EX1Si1N0 O"E"'N' BRUCE W. AND SUSAN E. WALUCK Ouhmmm)OF RECORD 22 BURNING TREE LANE lsb Oeo Ryder Rd s WEST BARNSTABLE, MA -- - - Chothorrm MA 02638 PR�ERTY J1001RESS Dovldcov®HotmoO.com Imm.JULY 27 2016 508 364-0894 Fa 1f1 Co- DRPL-1B12 Roma, Paul From: Lovell, Cynthia Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:16 AM To: Roma, Paul Subject: 22 Burning Tree Lane Good Morning I just had a call from Councilor Philip Wallace regarding 22 Burning Tree Lane, a man by the name of Joe Gill has been trying to reach you with regards to this property and a run off that is happening.The home owner was told to have a permanent fixture of some sort by the end of June to prevent this from happening, Councilor Wallace is receiving complaints from the surrounding neighbors because its August and nothing has been done. Could you please reach out to Councilor Wallace regarding this property at 508-280-1085 please.Thanks Cynthia A. Lovell Town Council Administrator ' 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Cynthia.Lovell@town.barnstable.ma.us 508-862-4738 r Cell#.,774-320-5954 ' e- 4!f i S 1 Roma, Paul From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 9:03 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Roma, Paul Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Bob: I'm glad we met at the Building Department counter yesterday afternoon. My wife and I continue to be totally frustrated that this runoff has still not been corrected by Mr. Waluck— and after more than 2 years of promises and delays and runoff flooding our property. You gave me a copy of a plan by Eco-Tech dated July 27, 2016 showing a design of a detention area. There is very little information in this plan so as we discussed you agreed to call Eco-Tech to get more details. A complete copy of the entire plan is needed including what are the tank like structures adjacent to the detention area and a copy of the runoff calculations showing water volume and disbursion into the sand layer that is about 10 feet below ground level. Also there must be a provision for clean out so that over time the system does not silt up and fail. Construction will leave the ground bare and so what provisions will be made to keep silt and m-ud from flowing into the system while grass is becoming established. All of the features I mention here were shown in the design for this property done by Dan Ojala of Down Cape. There should also be a letter or statement from Eco-Tech certifying the design and performance. My point is that you and I and the town must make reasonable efforts to be assured the Eco-Tech plan will perform properly before it is installed. Finally when will the work be done? Please email the information to me or I can go to your office to pick it up. Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 1:15 PM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us)<robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip_n_wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: We are sorry to report there is still no dry well construction activity at 22 Burning Tree. To put this into context Mr Waluck has had over 2 years too comply with town regulations and now he is almost 2 months beyond the June 15, 2016 completion date ordered in your Certified Letter of April 15, 2016. There is no excuse for this continued delay— Mr Waluck's email below clearly shows no urgency and borders on insult. We would like to meet with you and Mr. Roma at your earliest convenience. Please give us a call at 508-733-1010 or an email to set up a date. 1 We are copying Phil Wallace in the hopes that he can join us for the meeting. Many thanks, Joe and Nancy Gill From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@vahoo.com] Sent:Wednesday,July 13, 2016 7:51 AM To:Joe and Nancy Gill<iosephgill@corncast.net> Subject: Project Hi-Joe, Still planning on investing in the drainage project. Our engineer is very busy and slow, but is getting closer to completion. I'll send email when I know more. Bruce 2 Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 9:16 AM To: 'David' Cc: 'Bruce Waluck' Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Good Morning David, Sorry for the long time to respond. There is no requirement for a building permit to perform this work. If a wall were to be part of the plan it would have to be permitted if it measured greater than 48"from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall. However, I did not see any wall on the plan. And of course,you are the authority that determines if this will function to eliminate the runoff from 22 Burning Tree Lane the neighbor's property at 42 Burning Tree Lane. Thank you, Robert McKechnie Local.lnspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 _ II 1 -----Original Message----- From: David [mailto:davidcou@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday,August 08,20161:40 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Good afternoon, I My client, Mr Bruce Waluck would like to relandscape the property according to the attached plan. Will any sort of permit be required? Thanks! David D. Coughanowr Eco-Tech Rapid Response 508 364-0894 1 WEST BARNSTABLE. MA. 0 Q0p �o THIS IS Amy N COLOR PLAN aQ1 NOT = USE COLOR PLAN ONLY �a.�.A 4P TO FOR INSTALLATION - ;� SCALE FULL DETAIL IS BEST ' VIEWED IN i FULL COLOR • Io q q'"ggy OvrF HO 30\ 3i Z0,, . A - JJ. .i �!ON ARfA sfx 1 SEPTIC , TANK 'o- I � ,t SOIL BSORPTION��' ]s SYSTEM ,� • \^ ]o Mn �\ 7 C ro o- AREA = 35)200 PA�Dl PAGE IO7 Pcc..25� � FY_�-k� M� •il � ���lr f. *,c I �bhp}ram PLAN SCALE: I in = 30 f t, LJ 30 60 PRINT OP it r. I7 n PAPER FOR PROPER. SCALE PROPOSED RUNOFF DETENTION AREA Dlti ENSION P D DE T It �tN or`A7ity�\ .. DAVID eo 7e re co I � �)!!3114 WLtl +I e2.25%Ly t No.W3 N: 461 I GIS(Ea , SECTION A-A LP- fiVt.; 27.33 rr _ L 1733-iE .__� NOT SECTION 8-8 T C) SCALE PROPOSED RUNOFF CONTROL PLAN - -TO SERVE EXISTING DWELLING BRUCE W. AND SUSAN E. WALUCK OWNERISI OF RECORD 22 BURNING TREE LANE 155 Goo R do. Rd s 'WEST BARNSTABLE. MA 11Chothom, 33 MA 026 PROPERTY ADDRESS Dov3dcou®HotmolLcom IDAYri JULY 27 2016 50)8 364-0894 PG.In Is, DRPL-1812 � Mckechnie, Robert From: David <davidcou@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:05 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Good morning, It appears you can go ahead with the regrading plan! David From: Mckechnie, Robert [Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Tuesday,August 16, 2016 9:16 AM To: David Cc: Bruce Waluck Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Good Morning David, Sorry for the long time to respond. There is no requirement for a building permit to perform this work. If a wall were to be part of the plan it would have to be permitted if it measured greater than 48"from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall. However, I did not see any wall on the plan. And of course,you are the authority that determines if this will function to eliminate the runoff from 22 Burning Tree Lane the neighbor's property at 42 Burning Tree Lane. Thank you, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector, Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601. 508-862-4033 ----Original Message----- From: David [mailto:davidcou@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday,August 08, 2016 1:40 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Good afternoon, My client, Mr Bruce Waluck would like to relandscape the property according to the attached plan. 1 Will any sort of permit be required? Thanks! David D. Coughanowr Eco-Tech Rapid Response 508 364-0894 • 2 r , Mckechnie, Robert From: Scali, Richard Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 12:19 PM To: Ells, Mark Cc: Weil, Ruth; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert; Lauzon, Jeffrey Subject: Re: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mark I know that staff and I have discussed this in the past. I will get an update on Monday when we are all back in office. Richard ' Sent from my iPhone On Aug 19, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Ells, Mark<Mark.Ellsna,town.barn stable.ma..Lis> wrote: Richard, Phil Wallace called today inquiring about this matter. Can you please look into the matter and get back to Mr. Gill? From: Philip Wallace [mailto:philip n wallace(abhotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:33 PM To: Ells, Mark Subject: Fwd: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Hi Mark, You can see the request made by my constituent Joe Gill. Can we make his request possible? Cheers, Phil Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Joe" <joseph rill(@,comcast.nel> Date: August 16, 2016 at 9:10:32 AM EDT To: "Phil Wallace" <philip n wallace a,hotmail.com> Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Phil — if OK with please forward the email below to the Mark Ells. I think we should have a meeting with Mark as soon as possible which should include Bob McKechnie and Paul Roma. Based on what I know now I have many concerns. Thanks, Joe i 1 i I From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net) Sent:Tuesday, August 16, 2016 9:03 AM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma,us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (Paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us)<paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: I'm glad we met at the Building Department counter yesterday afternoon. My wife and I continue to be totally frustrated that this runoff has still not been corrected by Mr. Waluck— and after more than 2 years of promises and delays and runoff flooding our property. You gave me a copy of a plan by Eco-Tech dated July 27, 2016 showing a design of a detention area. There is very little information in this plan so as we discussed you agreed to call Eco- Tech to get more details. A complete copy of the entire plan is needed including what are the tank like structures adjacent to the detention area and a copy of the runoff calculations showing water volume and disbursion into the sand layer that is about 10 feet below ground level. Also there must be a provision for clean out so that over time the system does not silt up and fail. Construction will leave the ground bare and so what provisions will be made to keep silt and mud from flowing into the system while grass is becoming established. All of the features I mention here were shown in the design for this property done by'Dan Ojala of Down Cape. There should also be a letter or statement from Eco-Tech certifying the design and performance. My point is that you and I and the town must make reasonable efforts to be assured the Eco-Tech plan will perform properly before it is installed. Finally when will the work be done? Please email the information to me or I can go to your office to pick it up. Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday,August 5, 2016 1:15 PM To: Bob McKechnie (robe rt.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us)<paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: 2 We are sorry to report there is still no dry well construction activity at 22 Burning Tree. To put this into context Mr Waluck has had over 2 years too comply with town regulations and now he is almost 2 months beyond the June 15, 2016 completion date ordered in your Certified Letter of April 15, 2016. There is no excuse for this continued delay— Mr Waluck's email below clearly shows no urgency and borders.on insult. We would like to meet with you and Mr. Roma at your earliest convenience. Please give us a call at 508-733-1010 or an email to set up a date. We are copying Phil Wallace in the hopes that he can join us for the meeting. Many thanks, Joe and Nancy Gill From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluckCa@yahoo.com] Sent:Wednesday,July 13, 2016 7:51 AM To:Joe and Nancy Gill<ioseph�ill@comcast.net> Subject: Project Hi Joe, Still planning on investing in the drainage project. Our engineer is very busy and slow, but is getting closer to completion. i I'll send email when I know more. Bruce 3 I Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 5:06 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: runoff Bob — much appreciated — I look forward to the report - Joe From: Mckechnie, Robert fmailto:Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 4:35 PM To:Joe<iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: runoff Hi Joe, I have been working on a report on this issue for some time today but will not complete it until Monday or Tuesday. At that time I will email all parties involved. Thank you, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 0 1 r Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 4:20 PM To: 'David' Cc: 'Bruce Waluck'; 'phi lip_n_wallace@comcast.net'; 'Joe'; Roma, Paul Subject: 22 Burning Tree Detention Plan Hi David, i I have looked at your plan again and have questions: 1.) Is your plan for an empty pit where water is to accumulate and simply evaporate? 2.)The plan doesn't show where the water is going. Most plans of this type have a noted detail about what is being done and what will happen to the water once it finds your design (where it will flow to). 3.) It appears that your design could hold about 1100 cubic feet of water(or approximately 8,000 gallons) if no gravel or sand, etc., is in the "detention area". I need a better understanding of how this will work. i Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 i r 1 I Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 1:37 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Roma, Paul Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Bob: I think you will agree that for all of us to be assured that things will finally be done right the Runoff Control Plan should be designed by a Professional Engineer and have a P E stamp. On the proposed plan dated July 27, 2016 there is a Sanitarian stamp and a Soil Evaluator stamp but no P E. Let me know what you think.Thanks,Joe -----Original Message----- From: Mckechnie, Robert [ma i Ito:Robert.McKechnie town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent: Friday,August 19, 2016 4:08 PM To: David<davidcou hotmail.com> Cc: Bruce Waluck<brucewaluck@vahoo.com>;Joe<iosephhgilI@comcast.net>;phillip n waI lace @comcast.net; Roma, Paul <Paul.Roma @town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Hi David, I have looked at your plan again and have questions: 1.) Is your plan for an empty pit where water is.to accumulate and simply evaporate? 2.)The plan doesn't show where the water'is going. Most plans of this type have a noted detail about what is being done and what will happen to the water once it finds your design (where it will flow to). 3.) It appears that your design could hold about 1100 cubic feet of water(or approximately 8,000 gallons) if no gravel or sand, etc., is in the "detention area". I need a better understanding of how this will work. -----Original Message----- From: David [mailto:davidcou@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday,August 17, 2016 5:05 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Good morning, It appears you can go ahead with the regrading plan! David From: Mckechnie, Robert [Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Tuesday,August 16, 2016 9:16 AM To: David 1 Cc: Bruce Waluck Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Good Morning David, Sorry for the long time to respond. There is no requirement for a building permit to perform this work. If a wall were to be part of the plan it would have to be permitted if it measured greater than 48"from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall. However, I did not see any wall on the plan. And of course,you are the authority that determines if this will function to eliminate the runoff from 22 Burning Tree Lane the neighbor's property at 42 Burning Tree Lane. Thank you, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 -----Original Message----- " From: David [mailto:davidcou@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday,August 08,2016 1:40 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: 22 Burning Tree Preliminary Plan attached Good afternoon, My client, Mr Bruce Waluck would like to relandscape the property according to the attached plan. Will any sort of permit be required? Thanks! David D. Coughanowr Eco-Tech Rapid Response 508 364-0894 I f 2 r Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 1:45 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Roma, Paul Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: FW:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan - 22 Burning Tree Attachments: 14-350 22 Burning Tree Drywell Calcs.pdf, RATIONAL 14-350.pdf Bob: You may remember that in 2014 1 paid Dan Ojala who is a Professional Engineer at Down Cape Engineering to do a drywell design and gave that design to Mr Waluck— he did not use the design. I pulled up my copy of the design and am resending it to you as it was 2 years ago and may be archived or not available in the town system. This is the kind of design and analysis that is needed to do a proper drainage system and may be a helpful reference in looking at the Eco-Tech design. Dan's design has over 5,000 gallons of capacity and at the sand layer about 10 feet down it will absorb or infiltrate 224 gallons per minute —that means this system will continuously handle a heavy rainstorm or back to back rainstorms without overflowing. This email shows calculations — I will send the construction detail in a second email. As I mentioned in an email yesterday there is no PE stamp on the Eco-Tech plan and as we discussed and at least so far no supporting detail or calculations performed by a PE. Regards, Joe From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 8:45 AM To: 'Joe'<iosephgill@comcast.net> Cc: 'Heather Vermette'<hvermette@downcape.com> Subject: RE: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Hi, Joe: The four feet of stone around the 1,000 gallon pit provides an additional 3,000 gallons for 3,920 gallons total storage. Storage volume above the rim in the bowl and in the voids in the sand is not included, that would add to the capacity. The trick is to keep the water going into this leaching system clear from silt. If kept clean, it will reliably infiltrate 224 gallons per minute into the ground, so the storage volume under these conditions is wholly adequate. I was thinking another drywell should be used for the front roof drain, I just did the calcs for the rear of the roof. i r Attached are dry-well capacity and the rational drainage design utilized. Thanks, Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering,inc. 939 Main St.Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] — Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 7:53 AM To: Dan Ojala Subject: RE: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Dan: I just looked at the plan carefully and note the roof drain connection. I am sure you worked it out but I had expected a tank of more than 1,000 gal—does all of the sand work as additional tank capacity?Thanks again,Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 201410:55 PM To: 'Daniel A.Ojala PE, PLS' Subject: RE:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Dan: Thanks for getting this done today—I have forwarded it to Bob McKechnie. A very creative solution solving the problem both short term and long term -terrific! Does the pit and tank have the capacity to handle the roof or does that need a separate dry well—and if a separate dry well is needed for the roof should that be say a 1,000 gal for front and a 1,000 gal.for rear?Joe From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe' Subject:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Joe: Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. The design if for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. 2 I I Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineerinp,, inc. 939 Main St.Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. 3 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday,August 23, 2016 1:46 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Roma, Paul Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: FW:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan - 22 Burning Tree Attachments: 14-350 DRAINAGE REPAIR 11x17 (1).pdf Bob: As promised the construction details. Joe From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe' <iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Joe: Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. The design if for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering, inc. 939 Main St.Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. i 6 � g N Y 4 LO co MAP 136 026 ILL SIDENCE SEPTI /4p i ^� SYS o EXISTING DWELLING (O� N MAP 1 6 02 DRIVE M0136 # 2# 2 < \N ARE PLAN VIEW Scale:1 40' 0 20 40 60 80 100 FEET \ GZ LEAVE OPEN SAND FOR TEMPORARY FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN FRAME h GRATE \ Q0� G CONSTRUCTION UNTIL SITE STABILIZED I PERIOD POOLING REMOVE CONSTRUCTION SILTATION PRIOR l co ZONE DEPTH PER TO FINAL PLANTING, PLACE SOD ON RETDlRON AREA \ WW ✓:: '::::.•.PLAN PRIOR TO REMOVING FILTER FABRIC ✓ ..1 00 ON LINE AND GRADE PER REMOVE CONSTRUCTION SILT AS REQUIRED \ ® \ O� PLAN VIEW UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED. PLACE DOUBLE LAYER OF FILTERFABRIC BETWEEN FRAME :;:.;1:.• �\ \ �� CRATE UNTIL SITE STABLE. D OG1 S RIM EL 32.0In 15 COARSE SAND COARSE SAND '.a�'•�',•• s FILL FILL v Scale:1"=10• 10 SCALE DETAIL VIEW BASIN ::•`.' FILL Y,•:,f•-'::';• UNSUITABLE SOIL REMOVAL9, psi 0. 27.0 REQUIRED ' OVERALL SIZE tj 0 5 10 15 20 25 FEET ,B x 34 x7.s DRAINAGE oo n :A. a — SKETCH PLAN H-20 LOCATED AT 1000 GAL. m LEACHPR 4•SCH40 PVC AT SHOREY OR EQUAL ORIGINAL CLEAN SAND BELOW 22 BURNING TREE LANE 000000000 00000°000 00.000000 0o*o*o0°0 2% MIN. IN FROM 8g'.00,08 °000..... REAR ROOF DRAINS $o$o$o$o$ 000,°°°o° 90 PER SOIL LOG TH2 REMOVE To CLEAN SAND, WEST BARNSTABLE MA eeae$eeeao REPLACE SILT LOAM WITH 000000000000000000000000o CLEAN COARSE SAND o000000 °o°000 3/4•— 1 1/2• / PREPARED FOR DOUBLE WASHED STONE 4' MIN. AROUND PIT JOSEPH GILL FOR #22 SITE SECTION VIEW N.T.S. DECEMBER 11, 2014 0. off 508-362-4541 fax 50IN _9880 NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO downcope.com LOCATE UTILITIES AND NOTIFY DIGSAFE, ADJUST GRADES TO own co a e/l /ne�ri�D,/dc. MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS, PREPARED BY: DANIEL A. OJALA, P.L.S., P.E. MAINTAIN DESIGN SHAPE. Civil engineers REF. SITE PLAN BY ECO-TECH land surveyors REVISED AUG. 30, 2013 939 Moin Street ( Rte 6A) LICE ##14-350 YARMOUTHPORT MA 02675 14-350 GILL.DWG Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 3:41 PM To: Scali, Richard Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Good Afternoon Richard, I attempted to see you at 3:30 but your door was closed. I presumed you were busy. Can we connect tomorrow morning at some time we could go over this file/issue? In a nutshell, Mr.Walluck hired an engineer, David Coughanowr, to design a system that would control the runoff. The engineer took a significant amount of time after he met with me to explain that he was very busy. A plan was received in this office recently.When Mr. Waluck notified us that he had hired an engineer we verbally gave him more time as we felt that he was proceeding in the proper direction. Anyhow, Wednesday AM would be a better time. Thanks, Bob Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 From: Scali, Richard Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 10:41 AM To: Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Anderson, Robin Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Paul and Bob: Could you see me today on this issue. Is Mr.Walluck in violation of your letter of April 15, 2016? Not sure if I have all the facts. Richard From: Ells, Mark Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:30 AM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Richard, 1 Phil Wallace called today inquiring about this matter. Can you please look into.the matter and get back to Mr. Gill? From: Philip Wallace [mailto:philip n waIlace(&hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:33 PM , To: Ells, Mark Subject: Fwd: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Hi Mark, You can see the request made by my constituent Joe Gill. Can we make his request possible? Cheers, Phil Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Joe" <ioseph i.11.a,comcast.n.et> Date: August 16, 2016 at 9:10:32 AM EDT To: "Phil Wallace" <philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Phil — if OK with please forward the email below to the Mark Ells. I think we should have a meeting with Mark as soon as possible which should include Bob McKechnie and Paul Roma. Based on what I know now.l have many concerns. .Thanks, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Tuesday,August 16, 2016 9:03 AM To: Bob McKechnie(robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robe rt.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (pa ul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<Philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: I'm glad we met at the Building Department counter yesterday afternoon. My wife and I continue to be totally frustrated that this runoff has still not been corrected by Mr. Waluck— and after more than 2 years of promises and delays and runoff flooding our property. You gave me a copy of a plan by Eco-Tech dated July 27, 2016 showing a design of a detention area. There is very little information in this plan so as we discussed you agreed to call Eco-Tech to get more details. A complete copy of the entire plan is needed including what are the tank like structures adjacent to the detention area and a copy of the runoff calculations showing water volume and disbursion into the sand layer that is about 10 feet below ground level. Also there must be a provision for clean out so that over time the system does not silt up and fail. Construction will leave the ground bare and 2 so what provisions will be made to keep silt and mud from flowing into the system while grass is becoming established. All of the features I mention here were shown in the design for this property done by Dan Ojala of Down Cape. There should also be a letter or statement from Eco-Tech certifying the design and performance. My point is that you and I and the town must make reasonable efforts to be assured the Eco-Tech plan will perform properly before it is installed. Finally when will the work be done? Please email the information to me or I can go to your office to pick it up. Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosepheill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday,August 5, 2016 1:15 PM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree-Runoff Bob: We are sorry to report there is still no dry well construction activity at 22 Burning Tree. To put this into context Mr Waluck has had over 2 years too comply with town regulations and now he is almost 2 months beyond the June 15, 2016 completion date ordered in your Certified Letter of April 15, 2016. There is no excuse for this continued delay— Mr Waluck's email below clearly shows no urgency and borders on insult. We would like to meet with you and Mr. Roma at your earliest convenience. Please give us a call at 508-733-1010 or an email to set up a date. We are copying Phil Wallace in the hopes that he can join us for the meeting. Many thanks, Joe and Nancy Gill From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] Sent:Wednesday,July 13, 2016 7:51 AM To:Joe and Nancy Gill<iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: Project Hi Joe, Still planning on investing in the drainage project. Our engineer is very busy and slow, but is getting closer to completion. I'll send email when I know more. Bruce 3 Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Tuesday,August 23, 2016 3:31 PM To: 'Joe' Cc: Roma, Paul Subject: RE:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan - 22 Burning Tree Hi Joe, Thanks for that information. It is a permanent part of the correspondence file.The original emails were received from both you and Dan Ojala on December 11, 2014. I believe that we discussed the fact that it is the property owners choice as to what plan they may choose to eliminate the excessive water runoff. I will try to be in touch in the next two days with an update. Thanks, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 1:45 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Roma, Paul Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: FW: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan - 22 Burning Tree Bob: You may remember that in 20141 paid Dan Ojala who is a Professional Engineer at Down Cape Engineering to do a drywell design and gave that design to Mr Waluck— he did not use the design. I pulled up my copy of the design and am resending it to you as it was 2 years ago and may be archived or not available in the town system. This is the kind of design and analysis that is needed to do a proper drainage system and may be a helpful reference in looking at the Eco-Tech design. Dan's design has over 5,000 gallons of capacity and at the sand layer about 10.feet down it will absorb or infiltrate 224 gallons per minute —that means this system will continuously handle a heavy rainstorm or back to back rainstorms without overflowing. This email shows calculations— I will send the construction detail in a second email. As mentioned in an email yesterday there is no PE stamp on the Eco-Tech plan and as we . 1 I y discussed and at least so far no supporting detail or calculations performed by a PE. Regards, Joe From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 8:45 AM To: 'Joe'<iosephgill@comcast.net> Cc: 'Heather Vermette' <hvermette@downcape.com> Subject: RE: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Hi, Joe: The four feet of stone around the 1,000 gallon pit provides an additional 3,000 gallons for 3,920 gallons total storage. Storage volume above the rim in the bowl and in the voids in the sand is not included, that would add to the capacity. The trick is to keep the water going into this leaching system clear from silt. If kept clean, it will reliably infiltrate 224 gallons per minute into the ground, so the storage volume under these conditions is wholly adequate. I was thinking another drywell should be used for the front roof drain, I just did the calcs for the rear of the roof. Attached are drywell capacity and the rational drainage design utilized. Thanks, Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering, inc. 939 Main St.Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 7:53 AM To: Dan Ojala Subject: RE: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan 2 Dan: I just looked at the plan carefully and note the roof drain connection. I am sure you worked it out but I had expected a tank of more than 1,000 gal—does all of the sand work as additional tank capacity?Thanks again,Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 201410:55 PM To:'Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS' Subject: RE:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Dan: Thanks for getting this done today—I have forwarded it to Bob McKechnie.A very creative solution solving the problem both short term and long term -terrific! Does the pit and tank have the capacity to handle the roof or does that need a separate dry well—and if a separate dry well is needed for the roof should that be say a 1,000 gal for front and a 1,000 gal for rear?Joe From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe' Subject: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Joe: Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. The design if for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering, Inc. 939 Main St. Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. 3 MckediInie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 3:46 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Roma, Paul Subject: RE:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan - 22 Burning Tree Bob: Do you have a reply yet from Eco-Tech yet on how it functions or any calculations? Joe From: Mckechnie, Robert [ma ilto:Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Tuesday, August 23, 2016 3:31 PM To:Joe<josephgill@comcast.net> Cc: Roma, Paul<Paul.Roma @town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan-22 Burning Tree Hi Joe, Thanks for that information. It is a permanent part of the correspondence file.The original emails were received from both you and Dan Ojala on December 11, 2014. I believe that we discussed the fact that it is the property owners choice as to what plan they may choose to eliminate the excessive water runoff. t I will try to be in touch in the next two days with an update. Thanks, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 From: Joe [mailto josephgill(abcomcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 1:45 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Roma, Paul Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: FW: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan - 22 Burning Tree Bob: You may remember that in 20141 paid Dan Ojala who is a Professional Engineer at Down Cape Engineering to do a drywell design and gave that design to Mr Waluck— he did not use the design. I pulled up my copy of the design and am resending it to you as it was 2 years ago and may be archived or not available in the town system. This is the kind of design and analysis that is needed to do a proper drainage system and may be a helpful reference in looking at the Eco-Tech design. Dan's design has over 5,000 gallons of capacity and at the sand layer about 10 feet down it will absorb or infiltrate 224 gallons per minute —that means this system will continuously handle a heavy rainstorm or back to back rainstorms without overflowing. This email shows calculations — I will send the construction detail in a second email. As I mentioned in an email yesterday there is no PE stamp on the Eco-Tech plan and as we discussed and at least so far no supporting detail or calculations performed by a PE. Regards, Joe From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape downcape.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 8:45 AM To: 'Joe' <iosephgill@comcast.net> Cc: 'Heather Vermette'<hvermette@downcape.com> Subject: RE: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Hi, Joe: The four feet of stone around the 1,000 gallon pit provides an additional 3,000 gallons for 3,920 gallons total storage. Storage volume above the rim in the bowl and in the voids in the sand is not included, that would add to the capacity. The trick is to keep the water going into this leaching system clear from silt. If kept clean, it will reliably infiltrate 224 gallons per minute into the ground, so the storage volume under these conditions is wholly adequate. I was thinking another drywell should be used for the front roof drain, I just did the calcs for the rear of the roof. Attached are drywell capacity and the rational drainage design utilized. Thanks, Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering, inc. 939 Main St. Yarmouthport, MA 1-508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape.com 2 This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be°for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 7:53 AM To: Dan Ojala Subject: RE:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Dan: I just looked at the plan carefully and note the roof drain connection. I am sure you worked it out but I had expected a tank of more than 1,000 gal—does all of the sand work as additional tank capacity?Thanks again,Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:55 PM To: 'Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS' Subject: RE: Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Dan: Thanks for getting this done today—I have forwarded it to Bob McKechnie A very creative solution solving the problem both short term and long term -terrific! Does the pit and tank have the capacity to handle the roof or does that need a separate dry well—and if a separate dry well is needed for the roof should that be say a 1,000 gal for front and a 1,000 gal for rear?Joe From: Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS [mailto:downcape@downcape.com] Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:19 PM To: 'Joe' Subject:Waluck Drainage Repair Plan Joe: Attached is a drainage repair plan that should provide a decent solution. The design if for a large stripout down to clean sand, fill with clean sand, create sandy bowl for temporary construction runoff, removing silt as required. Swales direct flow into the basin, and a plastic liner helps prevent breakout of water toward your property. Install the large subsurface drain but leave filter fabric between the frame and grate to prevent construction silt from damaging the leaching pit. Once the site is stable, remove final construction silt from sand bowl, and place loam and sod in the basin, remove filter fabric. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel A. Ojala PE, PLS down cape engineering, inc. 939 Main St. Yarmouthport, MA 3 i 1-'508-362-4541 x108 1-508-362-9880 fax downcape@downcape:com This Electronic Message contains information from the engineering firm of down cape engineering, inc., which may be privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. I i 4 Mckechnie, Robert From: Roma, Paul Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 4:08 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Bob would you please update Richard on this matter. Thanks, Paul From: Scali, Richard Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 10:41 AM To: Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Anderson, Robin Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Paul and Bob: Could you see me today on this issue. Is Mr. Walluck in violation of your letter of April 15, 2016? Not sure if I have all the facts. Richard From: Ells, Mark Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:30 AM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Richard, Phil Wallace.called today inquiring about this matter. Can you please look into the matter and get back to Mr. Gill? From: Philip Wallace [mailto:philip n wallace(o)hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:33 PM To: Ells, Mark Subject: Fwd: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Hi Mark, You can see.the request made by my constituent Joe Gill. Can we make his request possible? Cheers, Phil Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: i Z'= From: "Joe" <iose-phvrillQcomcast.net> Date: August 16, 2016 at 9:10:32 AM EDT To: "Phil Wallace" <philip n wallacenhotmail.com> Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Phil — if OK with please forward the email below to the Mark Ells. I think we should have a meeting with Mark as soon as possible which should include Bob McKechnie and Paul Roma. Based on what I know now I have many concerns.. Thanks, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] _ ^ Sent:Tuesday, August 16,2016 9:03 AM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstab le.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <Paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: I'm glad we met at the Building Department counter yesterday afternoon. My wife and I continue to be totally frustrated that this runoff has still not been corrected by Mr. Waluck— and after more than 2 years of promises and delays and runoff flooding our property. You gave me a copy of a plan by Eco-Tech dated July 27, 2016 showing a design of a detention area. There is very little information in this plan so as we discussed you agreed to call Eco-Tech to get more details. A complete copy of the entire plan is needed including what are the tank like structures adjacent to the detention area and a copy of the runoff calculations showing water volume and disbursion into the sand layer that is about 10 feet below ground level. Also there must be a provision for clean out so that over time the system does not silt up and fail. Construction will leave the ground bare and so what provisions will be made to keep silt and mud from flowing into the system while grass is becoming established. All of the features I mention here were shown in the design for this property done by Dan Ojala of Down Cape. There should also be a letter or statement from Eco-Tech certifying the design and performance. My point is that you and I and the town must make reasonable efforts to be assured the Eco-Tech plan will perform properly before it is installed. Finally when will the work be done? Please email the information to me or I can go to your office to pick it up. Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday,August 5, 2016 1:15 PM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) 2 <Paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: We are sorry to report there is still no dry well construction activity at 22 Burning Tree. To put this into context Mr Waluck has had over 2 years too comply with town regulations and now he is almost 2 months beyond the June 15, 2016 completion date ordered in your Certified Letter of April 15, 2016. There is no excuse for this continued delay— Mr Waluck's email below clearly shows no urgency and borders on insult. We would like to meet with you and Mr. Roma at your earliest convenience. Please give us a call at 508-733-1010 or an email to set up a date. We are copying Phil Wallace in the hopes that he can join us for the meeting. Many thanks, Joe and Nancy Gill From: Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] � „a.-......._,._.-• --_._�_a.._.-....�..._,.._.�..._...m.. . Sent:Wednesday,July 13, 2016 7:51 AM To:Joe and Nancy Gill<iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: Project Hi Joe, Still planning on investing in the drainage project. Our engineer is very busy and slow, but is getting closer to completion. I'll send email when I know more. Bruce 3 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday,August 25, 2016 8:08 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Roma, Paul; Phil Wallace Subject: RE:22 Burning Tree - Runoff Bob: . You did not respond on items 1 and 2 in my email below— please advise on those -Joe From: Mckechnie, Robert [mailto:Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) Sent:Wednesday,August 24,2016 4:26 PM To:Joe<iosephaill@comcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Gill, You are correct about the certificate of occupancy not being issued until the system is in and proves itself. I will remind you that the property owner at#22 has every right to select any system that his engineer says will work. That is his choice. We will not review the system nor permit it because the building code does not provide for such action. This is why we are relying on the engineer to provide the design. I will keep you posted, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 2:40 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert; Roma, Paul Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Bob: I should add that it is my understanding that the town will not issue an occupancy permit until we have proof that the runoff is stopped by observing successful performance in a heavy rainstorm. I know there is a note to that effect in the file but this is critical and I would appreciate your. confirmation on this point too. I think it also crucial that we all be confident i i that the Eco-Tech design is very likely to correct the runoff before Mr Waluck proceeds. As you know the heavy clay conditions make it very difficult for water to perc. Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Wednesday,August 24,2016 2:17 PM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us)<robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us)<Paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree-Runoff Bob: A short email to state where I believe we are on this project. 1.) You are working on a report that will be distributed shortly. 2.) You asked 3 questions on Eco-Tech re the design and performance of their proposed plan — I trust that will be available shortly and distributed to me and others. 3.) In you last email you indicated that Mr Waluck would decide what system to put in. I will reserve comment on that pending what Eco-Tech says re the design and performance of their plan. 4.) Once we all have items 1 and 2 above I want to have a sit down meeting with you and Mr Roma before the project proceeds. Please confirm 1 and 2 above. Regards, Joe i 2 Mckkhnie, Robert From: Scali, Richard Sent: Thursday,August 25, 2016 2:06 PM To: 'josephgill@comcast.net' Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; philip_n_waIlace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE:22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr. Gill: This is in response to your inquiry to Councilor Wallace which was forwarded to Mark Ells. I have consulted with Paul Roma and Bob McKechnie on the work they have done on this matter. Just as a brief synopsis,which I am sure you are familiar with on this matter, began in Nov. 2014.You met with Commissioner Perry,we received photos,a plan was prepared at your expense on the run-off from Mr.Waluck's new home construction at 22 Burning Tree. In April, 2015,you informed us that the run-off continued. A final inspection was to take place August 2015 only after the run-off was eliminated.A temporary occupancy certificate was issued due to hardship. Between Oct. 2015-Dec.2015,there were numerous phone calls and emails,whereby the run-off had lessened but still existed after attempts to contain.The temporary certificate expired Dec. 2015. In April 2016, a certified letter was sent to Mr,Waluck and emails stating no additional temporary certificates would be issued until the run-off was eliminated. Eco Tech visited the Building Dept in May, 2016 to discuss a containment plan. On Aug 8, 2016 a final plan was received from Eco Tech with many emails and calls back and forth on the design. On August 24, 2016, a Notice of Violation was sent out to Mr.Waluck stating that all work necessary to satisfy the Certificate of Occupancy must be completed by Sept 30, 2016 or he will be subject to fines. We hope that this letter will get the final plan to us with the necessary.details for containment. If not,fines will begin. Thank you for your patience on this matter. Richard Scali From: Ells, Mark Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:30 AM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth Subject: FW:1 22 Burning Tree - Runoff .Richard, Phil Wallace called today inquiring about this matter. Can you please look into the matter and get back to Mr. Gill? From: Philip Wallace [mailto:philip n wallace@hotmail.coml Sent: Tuesday,August 16, 2016 4:33 PM To: Ells,Mark Subject: Fwd: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Hi Mark, . You can see the request made by my constituent Joe Gill. Can we make his request possible? Cheers,. Phil 1 Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Joe" <osephgill@comcast.net> Date: August 16, 2016 at 9:10:32 AM EDT To: "Phil Wallace" <philip n wallacena hotmail.com> Subject: FW: 22 Burning'Tree - Runoff Phil — if OK with please forward the email below to the Mark Ells. I think we should have a meeting with Mark as soon as possible which should include Bob McKechnie and Paul Roma. Based on what I know now I have many concerns. Thanks, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.netl Sent:Tuesday,August 16,2016 9:03 AM To: Bob McKechnie(robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robe rt.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <Paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<Philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: I'm glad we met at the Building Department counter yesterday afternoon. My wife and I continue to be totally frustrated that this runoff has still not been corrected by Mr. Walu.ck— and after more than 2 years of promises and delays and runoff flooding our property. You gave me'a copy of a plan by Eco-Tech dated July 27, 2016 showing a design of a detention area. There is very little information in this plan so as we discussed you agreed.to call Eco-Tech to get more details. A complete copy of the entire plan is needed including what are the tank like structures adjacent to the detention area and a copy of the runoff calculations showing water volume and disbursion into the sand layer that is about 10 feet below ground level. Also there must be a provision for clean out so that over time the system does not silt up and fail. Construction will leave the ground bare and so what provisions will be made to keep silt and mud from flowing into the system while grass is becoming established. All of the features I mention here were shown in the design for this property done by Dan Ojala of Down Cape. There should also be a letter or statement from Eco-Tech certifying the design and performance. My point is that you and I and the town must make reasonable efforts to be assured the Eco-Tech plan will perform properly before it is installed. Finally when will the work be done? Please email the information to me or I can go to your office to pick it up. Regards, Joe . 2 From:Joe [mailto:iosepheill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday,August 5, 20161:15 PM . To: Bob McKechnie(robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robe rt.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (Paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <Paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject:22 Burning Tree-Runoff Bob: We are sorry to report there is still no dry well construction activity at 22 Burning Tree. To put this into context Mr Waluck has had over 2 years too comply with town regulations and now he is almost 2 months beyond the June 15, 2016 completion date ordered in your Certified Letter of April 15, 2016. There is no excuse for this continued delay— Mr Waluck's email below clearly shows no urgency and borders on insult. We would like to meet with you and Mr: Roma at your earliest convenience. Please give us a call at 508-733-1010 or an email to set up a date. We are copying Phil Wallace in the hopes that he can join us for the meeting. Many thanks, Joe and Nancy Gill From: Bruce Waluck[mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] Sent:Wednesday,July 13, 20161:51 AM To:Joe and Nancy Gill<iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: Project Hi Joe, Still planning on investing in the drainage project. Our engineer is very busy and slow, but is getting closer to completion. I'll send email when I know more. Bruce 3 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcasUet> Sent: Sunday,August 28, 20161:21 PM To. Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; philip-n_waIlace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr Scali: I have several questions concerning this project and would like to have a sit down meeting with you and Bob McKechnie and Paul Roma. Given the Sept 30 deadline I would like to meet this week if possible. I am available Tuesday 8 to 2; Wednesday 12 to 4; Thursday 8 to 11 and Friday 8 to 4. If we need to go into next week I am available on Sept 6 or 7 from 8-to 4. It would probably be best to meet once the final Eco-Tech plan is available so if you agree please set up a time accordingly. Regards, Joe Gill 508-733-1010 PS to Bob McKechnie — I trust you are the contact person on the plan — please email it to me when it's available. From:Scali, Richard [mailto:Richard.Scali@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Thursday,August 25, 2016 2:06 PM To:josephgill@comcast.net Cc:Weil, Ruth<Ruth.Weil@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Ells, Mark<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma.us>; philip_n_waI lace @comcast.net; Roma, Paul<Paul.Roma @town.barnstable.ma.us>; Mckechnie, Robert <Robert.McKechnie @town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Gill: This is in response to your inquiry to Councilor Wallace which was forwarded to Mark Ells. I have consulted with Paul Roma and Bob McKechnie on the work they have done on this matter. Just as-a brief synopsis, which I am sure you are familiar with on this matter, began in Nov. 2014.You met with Commissioner Perry,we received photos,a plan was prepared at your expense on the run-off from Mr. Waluck's .new home construction at 22 Burning Tree. In April, 2015,you informed us that the run-off continued. A final inspection was to take place August 2015 only after the run-off was eliminated.A temporary occupancy certificate was issued due to hardship. Between Oct. 2015-Dec. 2015, there were numerous phone calls and emails,whereby the run-off had lessened but still existed after attempts to contain.The temporary certificate expired Dec. 2015. In April 2016,a certified letter was sent to Mr.Waluck and emails stating no additional temporary certificates would be issued until the run-off was eliminated. Eco Tech visited the Building Dept in May, 2016 to discuss a containment plan.On Aug 8, 2016 a final plan was received from Eco Tech with many emails and calls back and forth on the design. On August 24, 2016, a Notice of Violation was sent out to Mr.Waluck stating that all work necessary to satisfy the Certificate of Occupancy must be completed by Sept 30, 2016 or he will be subject to fines. We hope that this letter will get the final plan to us with the necessary details for containment. If not,fines will begin. Thank you for your patience on this matter. 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Scali, Richard Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:05 AM To: Roma, Paul; Lauzon,Jeffrey,Anderson, Robin; Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Fwd:22 Burning Tree - Runoff Great job Paul by you and your staff! Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Joe" <iosephgill@a,comcast.net> Date: September 13, 2016 at 5:00:50 PM EDT To: "'Scali, Richard"' <Richard.Scali@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: "'Weil, Ruth"' <Ruth.Weil(a to,,vn.barnstable.ma.us>, "'Ells, Mark"' <Mark.El ls@town..barnstable.ma.us>, ghilip n wallace2comcast.net>, "'Roma, Paul"' <Paul.Romanu,town.barnstable.ma.us>, "'Mckechnie, Robert"' <Robert.McKechnie(c�town.barnstable.ma.us>, "Robin Anderson" <robin.an.dersonL&town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr. Scali: Over the past few days Mr. Waluck has installed a runoff detention area and a circular grate which appears to lead to a drywell. Our thanks to.you and the town officials above who have brought about this enforcement action. We very much appreciate the town's involvement and we hope very soon to see a stop to the runoff. The final test of compliance will come when grass is established in the detention area and we have a substantial rain storm Regards, Joe & Nancy Gill . From: tali, Richard [mailto:Richard.Scali@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Thurskay,Augus��, 016 2:06 PM To: 'ose h ill Mcorricast.net Cc:Weil, Ruth<R Weil town.barnstable.ma.us>; Ells, Mark<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable;ma.us>; Philip n wallace Oco st.net; Roma, Paul<Paul.Roma @town.barnstable.ma.us>; Mckechnie, Robert <Robert.McKechnie town. arnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE:22 Burning Tree- unoff Mr. Gill: This is in response to your inquiry to Counci r Wallace which was forwarded to Mark Ells. I have consulted with Paul Roma and Bob McKechnie n the work they have done on this matter: Just as a brief synopsis,which I am sure you are fami with on this matter, began in Nov. 2014. You met with Commissioner Perry,we received photos, a pla was prepared at your expense on the run-off from Mr:Waluck's new home construction at 22 Burning T e. In April, 2015,you informed us that the run-off continued. A final inspection was to take place August 15 only after the run-off was 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 4:58 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re:Copy of Letter Attached Attachments: 20160920 111018 (Medium)jpg;20160920 112557 (Medium)jpg;20160920 112833 (Medium)jpg Hi Bob, See attached pictures of our rain containment system at the end of our downpour today. No water moved onto the Gill's property. Every flows nicely into our 24" drywell. , r Also --we've added 17 trees along the back property to restrict water flow into our yard. You can clearly see this in picture 112557. Bruce From: "Mckechnie, Robert" <Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.up To: Bruce Waluck<brucewaluck(cDyahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 24, 2016 12:55 PM Subject: Copy of Letter Attached Please review the attached letter, Thank You Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 r 1 3EHt .r i c K��� }-Q � a• h t aa� - .ate '�M•.j�"y.,.a K+��w- �. f __; .� _,�,.•r`. ,�� a ,t let Y�, _ $} }� 7 fi' w m g cry a . ' 1 T yar l.— � ._� -rl. .T• '.. l^ .. -- __ -1 — -� �f � �..� � _ -�`-fir- �� '1c � ��_ aF" -a. -r..,.- .ate _ s..♦.+'>! _.> _ � _ l� -.•. '".� - -stJ� - � - f.t ;d�E' �"3., rt - ram' _,�. w✓-' - �,�•� _ -_ 'Gr � 31f�'. �e .. • -tom:.^1��_ -_ _ _ +! �h � _ ,�.+�`�!"'rc� _ _ t• 'M r'` ,.paw rf i-'� >'. � _ ,t • �. fie J' � � -. � ` �,�`- � - v,- ►�' Z2. A?46JPCAe-ice r. - 6 4A'Wf- P 1 mLU M I^� y,l Cf,y) _ L. C' E CD C -ar�x� � , ��- fey• _ ��c - _r / w a r � - - ear-�ai.� _ �.r_ - - _ ._ _ - _ -A.•- i .� , t �,`� �„r�,+�, .k•1'���- �� a t� }.+':mac � - r .i�t �"�. �"� u .I - r..sc � _ fit t l, .yam_--•� - - Omit l -. ,g Y r - _ ,' +� ''Y- �•�-��.."fig' v, b - _ _- ��„�_- _ c/� 2 /¢Nl=_ AW77Q ZO y y Cn rr� � rn i Mckechnie, Robert From: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7.:27 AM To: Mckechnie, Robert Subject: Re: Copy of Letter Attached Attachments: 20160920 181146 (Medium)jpg Hi Bob, One more picture showing that the water from heavy downpours have almost dissipated as of 6pm. Hydroseed covers the area. Absolutely no water travelled downhill from this area. Bruce From: Bruce Waluck<brucewaluck ahoo.com> To: "Mckechnie, Robert" <R ert.McKechnie town.barnstable.ma.us> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 16 4:58 PM Subject: Re: Copy of Letter Attach S Hi Bob, ���'� v✓` See attached pictures of our rain contain nt system at the end of our downpour today. No water moved onto the Gill's prope Every flows nicely into our 24" d II.. Also --we've added 17 trees ong the back property restrict water flow into our yard. You can clearly see this in icture 112557. Bruce From: "Mckechnie, Robert" < ert.McKech 'e town.barnstable.ma.us> To: Bruce Waluck <brucewaluck hoo. m> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 PM Subject: Copy of Letter Attached Please review the attached left , Thank You Robert McKechnie 1 rr:i � ^•i a-. ^� f�; t a <-c 4.�'��'i' ems. =�; _ ., -. - - - ;r, -fi a. :.��_ _3,�' +a _ .'Y� -. ,.+"���"n.{ry. �'it?_"��>.^.i.s-��er.,n..,f3' - �.� .r�" _ .y+L .:e{ ,;,, ••t - � �?C9s °i� '' -��'��.�.-.� d-= -- .. Y } w cm h co ca CV LL- O 0- C� t-1 f. } u c Mckechnie, Robert From: Mckechnie, Robert Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:24 AM To: Roma, Paul Subject: 22 Burning Tree Lane,WB runoff issue I have new pictures from the completed drainage control project on the Wallack's property from yesterday's rain. It looks like it is working. I will go by today to inspect it. Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 508-862-4033 1 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 2:15 PM To: Mckechnie, Robert;Anderson, Robin; Roma, Paul Cc: Phil Wallace Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Bob: The detention area and drywell are installed. I would like to get a copy of the plan. Please email it to me or if that is not possible I will drop by the office to pick it up. Regards, Joe From:Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Tuesday,September 13, 2016 5:01 PM To: 'Scali, Richard'<Richard.Scali@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: 'Weil, Ruth'<Ruth.Weil@town.barnstable.ma.us>; 'El Is, Mark'<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma.us>; 'philip_n_wallace@comcast.net'<philip_n_waI lace @comcast.net>; 'Roma, Paul'<Paul.Roma @town.barnstable.ma.us>; 'Mckechnie, Robert'<Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Robin Anderson (robin.anderson@town.barnstable.ma.us)<robin.anderson@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Scali: Over the past few days i - aluc has installed a runoff detention area and a circular.grate which appears to lead to a dry ll. Our thanks to you and the town officials above who have . brought about this enforcem acF : We very much appreciate the town's involvement and we hope very soon to see a stop to runoff. The final test of compliance will come when grass is established in the detent. ea we have a substantial rain storm Regards, Joe & Nancy Gill From:Scali, Richard mailto:Richard.Scali t arnstable.ma. s] Sent:Thursday,August 25, 2016 2:06 PM To: iosephgill@comcast.net Cc:Weil, Ruth<Ruth.Weil town.barnstable.ma. I , ar rk.Ells town.barnstable.ma.us>; Philip n waI lace @comcast.net; Roma, Paul<Paul.Roma tow arnstable.ma.us>; Mckechnie, Robert <Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr.Gill: This is in response to your inquiry to Councilor Wallace w ch ar to Mark Ells. I have consulted with Paul Roma and Bob McKechnie on the work they have don this matter. Just as a brief synopsis, which I am sure you are familiar with o ter, an in Nov. 2014.You met with Commissioner Perry,we received photos, a plan was prepar at your a nse on the run-off from Mr. Waluck's new home construction at 22 Burning Tree. In April, 2015,you informed hat t�ie•run-off continued. A final inspection was to take place August 2015 only after the run-off was eliminated. porary occupancy certificate was issued due to 1 I Mckechnie, Robert From: Scali, Richard ' Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 12:06 PM To: 'Joe' Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; phiIip_n_waIlace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert; Anderson, Robin Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr. Gill: I gather the circumstances have changed since our last correspondence Sept 131h. 1 will confer with our Building dept to see what plans we have on file for your review and have them revisit the site for an update. Richard Scali From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.n Sent:Thursday,-October-r3, 2016 11: 2-A To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark:- ilip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert; Anderson, Robin Subject: 22 Burnin ree - Runoff C � Mr Scali: ' re�G Please provide us with a copy of an. the detention area and the or dr well an other. Y Y runoff related structures th ave.r"eently been installed - also a copy of any runoff related calculations supplied b e designer, the town or others. Finally, please advise on this situation: there is a fl w of water going onto our road that comes from a rock pile at the south east corner of the pr rt - is t pump and if so it is illegal and we ask that the town require the owners to correct the situation Joe & Nancy Gill From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.netl Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 5:01 PM To: 'Scali, Richard'<Richard.Scali town.bar able.ma.us> Cc: 'Weil, Ruth'<Ruth.Weil town.bar able.ma.us>; 'Ells, Mark'<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma:us>; 'philip_n_wallace@comcast.net'< i n wallace comcast.net>; 'Roma, Paul'.<Paul.Roma@town.barnstable.ma.us>; 'Mckechnie, Robert'<Robert.McKe ie town.barnstable..m:a..us>;Robin=An erson (robin.anderson@town.barnstable.ma.us)<robin.anderson@town.barnstable.ma.us Subject: RE:22 Burning Tree-Runoff Mr. Scali: Over the past few days Mr. Waluck s installed a runoff detention area and a circular grate which appears to lead to a drywell. r-tb-a-n-ks you and the town off''aIs above who have brought about this enforcement action. We very m date the town's involvement and we hope very soon to see a stop to the run . The final test of compliance will come when grass is established in the detention area and we have a substa I rain storm Regards, Joe & Nancy Gill i I Mckechnie, Robert From: Scali, Richard Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 12:08 PM To: Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert;Anderson, Robin; Lauzon,Jeffrey Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Paul: Could you have staff review the files for any plans you have as requested. Also perhaps have Bob revisit the site. Richard From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Thursday, October 13, 2016 11:42 AM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; philip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert; Anderson, Robin Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr Scali: Please provide us with a copy of the plan for the detention area and the drywell or any other runoff related structures that have recently been installed - also a copy of any runoff related calculations supplied by the designer, the town or others. Finally, please advise on this situation: there is a flow of water going onto our road that comes from a rock pile at.the south east corner of the property— is this is coming fronla sump pump nd if so it is illegal and we ask that the town require the owners to correct the situation. Joe & Nancy Gill N O IlGc From:Joe [mailto:'ose h ill mcast.net] Sent:Tuesday,Septemb�,-,016 5:01 PM To: 'Scali, Richard' <Richard.Scali town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: 'Weil, Ruth'<Ruth.Weil@town.bar s able.ma.us>; 'Ells, Mark'<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma.us>; 'philip_n_wallace@comcast.net' <KH Wallace comcast.ne >; 'Roma, Paul'<Paul.Roma @town.barnstable.ma.us>; 'Mckechnie, Robert'<Robert.McKechnie town.ba stable. a us>; obin Anderson (robin.anderson@town.barnstable.ma.us)<robin. nder o wn.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Scali: Over the past few days Mr. ck has installed ar- off detention area and a circular grate which appears to lead to a drywell. Our than .s- you and the town officials above who have brought about this enforcement action. W��much appreciate the town's involvement and we hope very soon to see a stop to the runoff. The final test of compliance will come when grass is established in the detention area and We have a substantial rain storm Regards, Joe & Nancy Gill . 1 Roma, Paul From: Roma, Paul Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 8:11 AM To: 'Joe' f Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Dear Mr. Gill, You're welcome to come and look at our street file for the above referenced address and to purchase the pages you're looking for. Our staff will be more than happy to assist you. Sincerely, Paul Roma Building Commissioner From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 11:42 AM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; philip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert; Anderson, Robin Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr Scali: Please provide us with a copy of the plan for the detention area and the drywell or any other runoff related structures that have recently been installed - also a copy of any runoff related calculations supplied by the designer, the town or others. Finally, please advise on this situation: there is a flow of water going onto our road that comes from a rock pile at the south east corner of the property— is this is coming from a sump pump and if so it is illegal and we ask that the town require the owners to correct the situation. Joe & Nancy Gill From:Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 5:01 PM To:'Scali, Richard'<Richard.Scali@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: 'Weil, Ruth'<Ruth.Weil@town.barnstable.ma.us>; 'Ells, Mark'<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma.us>; 'philip_n_waI lace @comcast.net' <philip_n_wallace@comcast.net>; 'Roma, Paul'<Paul.Roma@town.barnstable.ma.us>; 'Mckechnie, Robert'<Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>;Robin Anderson (robin.anderson@town.barnstable.ma.us)<robin.anderson@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Scali: Over the past few days Mr. Waluck has installed a runoff detention area and a circular grate which appears to lead to a drywell. Our thanks to you and the town officials above who have brought about this enforcement action. We very much appreciate the town's involvement and we hope very soon to see a stop to the runoff. The final test of compliance will come when grass is established in the detention area and we have a substantial rain storm Regards, Joe & Nancy Gill 1 e From:Scali, Richard [ma ilto:Richard.Scali@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Thursday,August 25, 2016 2:06 PM To:josephgill@comcast.net Cc:Weil, Ruth<Ruth.Weil@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Ells, Mark<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Philip n waI lace @comcast.net; Roma, Paul <Paul.Roma@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Mckechnie, Robert <Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Gill: This is in response to your inquiry to Councilor Wallace which was forwarded to Mark Ells. I have consulted with Paul Roma and Bob McKechnie on the work they have done on this matter. Just as a brief synopsis,which I am sure you are familiar with on this matter, began in Nov. 2014. You met with Commissioner Perry,we received photos,a plan was prepared at your expense on the run-off from Mr. Waluck's new home construction at 22 Burning Tree. In April, 2015,you informed us that the run-off continued. A final inspection was to take place August 2015 only after the run-off was eliminated. A temporary occupancy certificate was issued due to hardship. Between Oct. 2015-Dec. 2015,there were numerous phone calls and emails, whereby the run-off had lessened but still existed after attempts to contain.The temporary certificate expired Dec. 2015. In April 2016, a certified letter was sent to Mr.Waluck and emails stating no additional temporary certificates would be issued until the run-off was eliminated. Eco Tech visited the Building Dept in May, 2016 to discuss a containment plan. On Aug 8, 2016 a final plan was received from Eco Tech with many emails and calls back and forth on the design. On August 24, 2016, a Notice of Violation was sent out to Mr.Waluck stating that all work necessary to satisfy the Certificate of Occupancy must be completed by Sept 30, 2016 or he will be subject to fines. We hope that this letter will get the final plan to us with the necessary details for containment. If not,fines will begin. Thank you for your patience on this matter. Richard Scali From: Ells, Mark Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:30 AM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Richard, Phil Wallace called today inquiring about this matter. Can you please look into the matter and get back to Mr. Gill? From: Philip Wallace [mailto:philip n wallace(abhotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:33 PM To: Ells, Mark Subject: Fwd: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Hi Mark, You can see_ the request made by my constituent Joe Gill. Can we make his request possible? Cheers, Phil ' 2 Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Joe" <josephgill(u�comcast.net> Date: August 16, 2016 at 9:10:32 AM EDT To: "Phil Wallace" <ph.ilip n wallacenhotmail.com> Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Phil — if OK with please forward the email below to the Mark Ells. I think we should have a meeting with Mark as soon as possible which should include Bob McKechnie and Paul Roma. Based on what I know now I have many concerns. Thanks, Joe From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Tuesday,August 16, 2016 9:03 AM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Bob: I'm glad we met at the Building Department counter yesterday afternoon. My wife and I continue to be totally frustrated that this runoff has still not been corrected by Mr. Waluck— and after more than 2 years of promises and delays and runoff flooding our property. You gave me a copy of a plan by Eco-Tech dated July 27, 2016 showing a design of a detention area. There is very little information in this plan so as we discussed you agreed to call Eco-Tech to get more details. A complete copy of the entire plan is needed including what are the tank like structures adjacent to the detention area and a copy of the runoff calculations showing water volume and disbursion into the sand layer that is about 10 feet. below ground level. Also there must be a provision for clean out so that over time the system does not silt up and fail. Construction will leave the ground bare and so what provisions will be made to keep silt and mud from flowing into the system while grass is becoming established. All of the features I mention here were shown in the design for this property done by Dan Ojala of Down Cape. There should also be a letter or statement from Eco-Tech certifying the design and performance. My point is that you and I and the town must make reasonable efforts to be assured the Eco-Tech plan will perform properly before it is installed. Finally when will the work be done? Please email the information to me or I can go to your office to pick it up. Regards, Joe 3 From:Joe [mailto:iosephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 1:15 PM To: Bob McKechnie (robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us) <robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Paul Roma (paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us) <paul.roma@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: Phil Wallace<philip n wallace@hotmail.com> Subject: 22 Burning Tree-Runoff Bob: We are sorry to report there is still no dry well construction activity at 22 Burning Tree. To put this into context Mr Waluck has had over 2 years too comply with town regulations and now he is almost 2 months beyond the June 15, 2016 completion date ordered in your Certified Letter of April 15, 2016. There is no excuse for this continued delay— Mr Waluck's email below clearly shows no urgency and borders on insult. We would like to meet with you and Mr. Roma at your earliest convenience. Please give us a call at 508-733-1010 or an email to set up a date. We are copying Phil Wallace in the hopes that he can join us for the meeting. Many thanks, Joe and Nancy Gill From:Bruce Waluck [mailto:brucewaluck@yahoo.com] _.._. . Sent:Wednesday,July 13, 2016 7:51 AM To:Joe and Nancy Gill<iosephgill@comcast.net> Subject: Project Hi Joe, Still planning on investing in the drainage project. Our engineer is very busy and slow, but is getting closer to completion. I'll send email when I know more. Bruce 4 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2017 12:56 PM To: Roma, Paul; 'Phil Wallace';Anderson, Robin; Mckechnie, Robert;Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark Subject: RE:22 Burning Tree - Runoff Attachments: IMG_2291 jpg Dear Mr. Roma: This is a follow up on the runoff status at 22 Burning Tree, West Barnstable. Late last year it appears a dry well system was installed. Has the town determined that the system performs properly in a moderate to heavy rain storm? We have been away for most of the winter and have not been able to observe any heavy storms. Secondly, the sump pump for this property may be illegally discharging directly onto the street—see the photo above taken today—there is a significant flow of water from the rock pile in the photo. The water flows only during and after storms and would seem to be sump pump related. Regards, Joe & Nancy Gill uo �wwp pw �Nd�'li . From: Roma, Paul [m8ilto:Paul.Roma @town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent: Monday,October 24, 2016 8:11 AM To:Joe<josephgill@comcast.net> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Dear Mr. Gill, You're welcome to come and look at our street file for the above referenced address and to purchase the pages you're looking for.Our staff will be more than happy to assist you. Sincerely, Paul Roma Building Commissioner From: Joe fmailto:josephgill(c)comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 11:42 AM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; philip n wallace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert; Anderson, Robin Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff MrScali: Please provide us with a copy of the plan for the detention area and the drywell or any other runoff related structures that have recently been installed - also a copy of any runoff'related calculations supplied by the designer, the town or others. Finally, please advise on this situation: there is a flow of water going onto our road that comes from a rock pile at the south east.corner of the property— is this is coming from a sump pump and if so it is illegal and we ask that the town require the owners to correct the situation. Joe & Nancy Gill From:Joe'[mailto:[osephgill@comcast.net] Sent:Tuesday,September 13,2016 5:01 PM 1 - Y ` ._a,ate. .. ` ♦ =-c�.:..� Y• _ _ ��r- � _ _ .. .+' ��-�' - M IL T ;,���-.�fX']�-u+� -i i�,�t �^, .�•.�+-�1s'e,µ' _�,� i��` _:�,�� JF -= l� � k _ ,., m� '�'��'af` � _ _ '_ ter°` - �r 4. y , - : ,=3 t L ^a .. s I Mckechnie, Robert j From: Scali, Richard Sent: Tuesday,July 11, 2017 1:07 PM To: Lauzon,Jeffrey Cc: Ells, Mark; Mckechnie, Robert; philip_n_wallace@comcast.net Subject: 22 Burning Tree Lane W. Barnstable Jeff: Just wanted to update you on a phone call I received today from Councilor Wallace. He received a call from Nancy and Joe Gill,42 Burning Tree Lane about the run off/discharge onto their property from 22 Burning Tree.As you may recall, ' when the new house was built there were certain building orders given on the run off,vegetation requirements and pathway into the marsh with erosion controls put in place. The Gills have been in our office before and I met them last year. Darcy reviewed the issues in 2014/2015,and determined that so long as is not turbid water, it would not require conservation action.She will revisit the property soon to look at the circumstances again to check the vegetation and the water quality as well as the fact with all the recent rain we just had that there are a lot of flooding and discharge j issues.You might want to look at the site again and the orders given and confer with the Gills. Darcy will update me on her findings. Richard Richard V. Scali, Esq. Director of Regulatory Services 200 Main St. Hyannis,MA 02601 508-862-4778 508:778--2412 fax I • Mckechnie, Robert. From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Monday,July 17, 2017 4:53 PM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; philip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert; Anderson, Robin Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr. Scali: Phil Wallace tells me he has advised you that the drywell at 22 Burning Tree failed during the storm on July7. Midway through the storm I checked the situation. The large rectangular pit and drywell about 30 feet off the lot line appeared to be working OK— it was full but not overflowing. The drywell at the property line that has small stone exposed did not work and there was a substantial flow of water onto our property —this is the drywell that is connected to the roof gutters and downspouts. I have still photos and video available. I realize it was a heavy storm but the drywell failed at an early point in the storm. It is clear that additional drywell capacity is needed to handle the roof gutters and downspouts. I have an email from Mr: Waluck indicating he may divert some of the flow from the roof—that's OK as long as the diverted water goes into a drywell with sufficient capacity—just dumping some roof water onto the lawn is unacceptable as it would then flow downhill onto our property. I appreciate your involvement in solving this ongoing problem. Please advise how the town plans to proceed. Many thanks, Joe Gill From:Scali, Richard [mailto:Richard.Scali@town.barnstable.ma.us] Sent:Thursday, October 13, 2016 12:06 PM To:Joe<josephgill@comcast.net> Cc:Weil, Ruth<Ruth.Weil@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Ells, Mark<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma.us>; philip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul<Paul.Roma @town.barnstable.ma.us>; Mckechnie, Robert <Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>;Anderson, Robin<Robin.Anderson@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Gill: I gather the circumstances have changed since our last correspondence Sept 131h. I will confer with our Building dept to see what plans we have on file for your review and have them revisit the site for an update. Richard Scali From: Joe [mailto:josephgillacomcast.net] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 11:42 AM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; philip n wallace@comcast.net; Roma, Paul; Mckechnie, Robert; Anderson, Robin Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff 1 Mckechnie, Robert From: Joe <josephgill@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday,July 26, 2017 9:38 PM .To:' Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; philip_n wallace@comcast.net; Mckechnie, Robert;Anderson, Robin; Lauzon,Jeffrey, Karle, Darcy Subject: RE:22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr Scali: Thank you for your email and the information. We would like to have a meeting with you and other town officials you feel are appropriate. This runoff situation has gone on for three years and it must come to an end. In the meeting we hope to persuade you how serious the situation is and to work with you and the town to stop this illegal activity. We want to get the facts in front of you and others as soon as possible and do this before the town makes any decisions. We have videos and photos and an extensive file that we will bring to the meeting. Please give us a call to set up the meeting. Regards, Joe and Nancy Gill 508-733-1010 From:Scali, Richard [mailto:Richard.Scali@town.barnstable.ma.usj Sent:Wednesday,July 26,2017 3:29 PM To:Joe<josephgilI@comcast.net> Cc:Weil, Ruth<Ruth.Weil@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Ells, Mark<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma.us>; philip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Mckechnie, Robert<Robert.McKechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us>;Anderson, Robin <Robin.Anderson@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Lauzon,Jeffrey<Jeffrey.Lauzon@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Karle, Darcy <Darcy.Karle@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr. Gill: I apologize for not getting back to you sooner on your email. I was away last week and wanted to confer with other divisions on this matter. It was also helpful that we had more rain these past two days to do further investigation. The conservation agent visited the site on Monday afternoon July 25th and there was no runoff crossing onto 42 Burning Tree and there was no evidence of dirty runoff or erosion damage that would cause any conservation concerns for the marshes.They could also not see any historic evidence of damage from the record rainfall a few weeks ago.#22 is completely vegetated with lawn and some shrubs out front and along the property line so one would not expect to see erosion or dirty sediment leaving the property under most rainfall events. I also sent this information to the Building commissioner to look at this from the building dept point of view and will confer with him further on this issue. I wanted to give you this updated information since you emailed last week. Thanks for your patience on this matter, Richard Scali From: Joe [mailt 'ose h ill comcast.net] Sent: Monday, July 1 , 4:53 PM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth�Elis;M hill n wallace co �et; Roma, Paul; Mc ech-nie;-R,obert; Anderson, Robin Subject: 22 Burning Tree - Runo 1 i Mckechnie, Robert From: Scali, Richard Sent: Thursday,July 27, 2017 11:18 AM To: Lauzon,Jeffrey; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Ells, Mark; philip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Karle, Darcy,Anderson, Robin Subject: FW:22 Burning Tree - Runoff Jeff After speaking to you this morning, I called Mr. Gill and he is available Thurs Aug 3 at 10:00 to come in and speak to us. He will bring his video and pictures. I did tell him that you would be out there the next big rain storm to try to view it yourself or have Bob view it. Please confirm if Aug 3 at 10:00 am is available for you. Richard From: Joe [mailto:josephgill@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2017 9:38 PM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; hilip_n_wallace@comcast.net; Mckechnie, Robert; Anderson, Robin; Lauzon, Jeffrey; Karle, Darcy Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tre - Runoff' Mr Scali: Thank you for your email an the information. We would like to have a meeting with you and other town officials you feel a e appropriate. This runoff situation has gone on for three years and it must come to an end. In a meeting we hope to persuade you how serious the situation is and to work with you nd the town to stop this illegal activity. We want to get the facts in front of you and others as on as possible and do this before the town makes any decisions. We have videos and phot and an extensive file that we will bring to the meeting. Please give us a call to set up the mee 'ng. Regards, Joe and Nancy Gill 508-733-1010 From:Scali, Richard [ma ilto:Richard.Scali town.bar table.ma.us Sent:Wednesday,July 26, 2017 3:29 PM To:Joe<iosephgilI@comcast.net> Cc:Weil, Ruth <Ruth.Weil@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Ells, ark<Mark.Ells@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Philip n wallace@comcast.net; Mckechnie, Robert<Robert. cKechnie town.barnstable.ma.us>;Anderson, Robin <Robin.Anderson@town.barnstable.ma.us>; Lauzon,Jeffrey< ffre .Lauzon town.barnstable.ma.us>; Karle, Darcy <Darcy.KaHe@town.barnstable.ma.us> Subject:.RE: 22 Burning Tree- Runoff Mr.Gill: I apologize for not getting back to you sooner on your email. I w\andthere t week and wanted to confer with other divisions on this matter. It was also helpful that we had more ra two days to do further investigation. The conservation agent visited the site on Monday afternoon July 2e as no runoff crossing onto 42 Burning Tree and there was no evidence of dirty runoff or erosion damage thause y conservation concerns for the marshes.They could also not see any historic evidence of damae recor rainfall a few weeks ago.#22 is completely vegetated with lawn and some shrubs out front andproperty ' e so one would not expect to see 1 I Mckechnie, Robert From: Lauzon,Jeffrey Sent: Thursday,July 27, 2017 12:18 PM To: Scali, Richard; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Ells, Mark; 'phi Iip_n_waIlace@comcast.net'; Karle, Darcy;Anderson, Robin Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff See you at 11:00 August 3. From: Scali, Richard Sent: Thursday,July 27, 2017 12:17 PM To: Lauzon, Jeffrey; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Ells, Mark; 'philip_n_wallace@comcast.net'; Karle, Darcy; Anderson, Robin Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Let's change it to 11:00 when you are free.Thanks Jeff. From: Lauzon, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:13 PM To: Scali, Richard; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Ells, Mark; 'philip_n_wallace@comcast.net'; Karle, Darcy; Anderson, Robin Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Richard, I have formal site plan review Thursday morning so will be unable to attend. I will talk to Bob and he can attend.Thank you. From: Scali, Richard Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 11:18 AM To: Lauzon, Jeffrey; Mckechnie, Robert Cc: Ells, Mark; Philip n wallace@comcast.net; Karle, Darcy; Anderson, Robin Subject: FW: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Jeff After speaking to you this morning, I called Mr. Gill and he is available Thurs Aug 3 at 10:00 to come in and speak to us. He will bring his video and pictures. I did tell him that you would be out there the next big rain storm to try to view it yourself or have Bob view it. Please confirm if Aug 3 at 10:00 am is available for you. Richard From: Joe [mailtoJosephgilMcomcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 9:38 PM To: Scali, Richard Cc: Weil, Ruth; Ells, Mark; philip n wallaceQcomcast.net; Mckechnie, Robert; Anderson, Robin; Lauzon, Jeffrey; Karle, Darcy Subject: RE: 22 Burning Tree - Runoff Mr Scali: 1 '"- ,� l+•t'�`i -��'� a -\` \ i.... J > � `•"�'a }w s - -^^�" •c , _ _ -'v`�' i�.rr r`� w� ,,., sr•µ -_ a. � �,+,�- ., •.,,,__ i ask 1 ,� �- AK .ate ►, "tl' _: .._ 4.. „4 y` - �," _�' y �_� � IL _ * - � � ��� •.rlLla � � � �tr^'T`�•T 5� t. �.•�� `.fit 4 L — ti s 4 � X VA .s y 77, y ` ` Ff' Y i ' WW _ i i q Town of Barnstable Geographic Information System October 8,2015 � �J r: �v. Map:136 Parcel:026 DISCLAIMER It is not adequate for legal P S This map is for planning purposes only q e9 Selected Parcel i boundary determination or regulatory interpretation. Enlargements beyond a scale of Owner:GILL,NANCY F 8 JOSEPH B Total Assessed Value:$1254800 00'may not meet established map accuracy standards. The parcel lines on this map 1"=1 w are only graphic representations of Assessor's tax parcels. They are not true property Co-Owner: Acreage:1.46 acres Abutters boundaries and do not represent accurate relationships to physical features on the map Location:42 BURNING TREE LANE such as building locations. Buffer Aerial Photos Taken April 19,2008 Town of Barnstable Geographic Information System October 8,2015 X 63.04'' t X 29.18 � O �.� X 7.37 �N A O 0 h X 32 X 55. 5 S� X 33.03 X 35.52 30 4 X 40.98 X 37. 40 X 38.as 4 40 ryo �O - O DISCLAIMERS:This map is for planning purposes only. It is not adequate for legal Map:136 Parcel:026 boundary determination or regulatory interpretation. Enlargements beyond a scale of Owner:GILL,NANCY F 8 JOSEPH B Total Assessed Value:$1254800 Selected Parcel N 1"=100'may not meet established map accuracy standards. The parcel lines on this map -e:1.46 acres Abutters w_ -E are only graphic representations of Assessor's tax parcels. They are not true property Co-Owner: Acrea 9 boundaries and do not represent accurate relationships to physical features on the map Location:42 BURNING TREE LANE such as building locations. Buffer Town of Barnstable Geographic Information System October 24,2014 aO J I ltJ o � X 27.37 S� � r Gr�c1 t i } Y' X 29.3 X 33.03 1 i X 35.52 l 0 33-Feet 2a El N DISCLAIMERS:This map is for planning purposes only. It is not adequate for legal Map:136 Parcel:026 N boundary determination or regulatory interpretation. Enlargements beyond a scale of Owner:GILL,NANCY F&JOSEPH B Total Assessed Value:$1255400 Selected Parcel 1"=100'may not meet established map accuracy standards. The parcel lines on this map are only graphic representations of Assessors tax parcels. They are not true property Co-Owner: Acreage:1.46 acres Abutters „y "E boundaries and do not represent accurate relationships to physical features on the map Location:42 BURNING TREE LANE such as building locations. Buffer �r ' t r ` e � ;. Lj 4 r ie Tl i• � ��W�>v .�a.. �,��� �'P � �.� .y�i t�, f�. "fry •�jt, '..L ; •'� - A� .1 t� �t � 0 y 74�" ' -�{ -e� y iY M'� �j _ - _ �7q ++ ,.•. '.a.._ erOki, t P .•ti Z :,{q _, yr II r i �rz ,l4Gt�Nl.V6 �6�e-- r K„ I dL Aw 4w 4WD oor ti 5 r- j ry . 1 Foh-r 2-Z 0—Z Ilk �' 11 ,yam 4 a w IN #. Je yk e • + it r a w i „ � r • a � � , i � .yam. � � 4• e � w • ik �, IF 11R yAe- �. li S low Al p 4 y� - '`die.. •, - w �_ yt �� ;t '!� �' .. r r 5 •¢v IrM` hyr- �! ) 4 yyy i 6• �sC�$A7�NSF., -,r• r� 3 rk•• „•f'� �•, ry�1•� ,, "+�cr. ���� �� - �?'��,�1: ':rY,. 1. d�s� �"t -i ,• yam,, "� � �.Y ref � �.. ,�. .� •� � � _ _ tea. ix �� '��,.;' - ` .' X. "+K?T'' rah` •��� v. .t,� a \.�i• ., � ' � ' �. S t. �,t fi'Ctlt. t. yv � .. .tom ..�`- 1 t'� '�. `.t x ` _ � � - - .. -. - � y� - _ _. _. f =a�- a a..w � .. , ^3 - �.�' � �, �� I. f �G; I M1 f � Jl' � ML J r � � .fr - y � _ 4. L ` u At t _ \\' All F -.s•r. Building Department Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis,MA 02601 Mr. Bruce Waluck Mrs. Susan Waluck 22 Burning Tree Lane West Barnstable, MA 02668 CERTIA10 MA Town of Barnstable ' Building Department U.S.POSTAGE>>RTNEveoWES 200 Main Street ���. Hyannis, MA 02601 � 0ZIP 2 4ry601 $ 006.465 7" 0000336455 APR. 19. 2016, �- 7015 0640 0005 8489 8386 AIOISINC ' 1st Notice Mr. Bruce W. Waluck 2nd Notice Mrs. Susan E. Waluck 9 f (' ul 22 Burning T�AA_i�a►,e Returned j YY Y of 7 n ---- West Barns i, NI..:XI:E rz';e Sj 101.3.6;, . UNCLAIMED UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 026014002'00 * BIZ2-10715-19- 45 gi k0A2 �t,,I��1'�1r111111„�I,i,a�lll'11�111�1'�+'��l'ilC�?'- „l111111111 r r - Wil 9QEQ 6ehQ soda 0+i90SENDEk: COMPLETE THIS SECTION- _ . l A.■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. Signature i name and address on the reverse ❑Agent ■ Print our /// Y X ❑Addressee So that we can return the Card to you. B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery ' ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑Yes i ) If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No iJWLO t , i 223. II I'lll'I I'll I'I I I I I I II l III I II I II II II II II II III ❑duMall ExpressS lt Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Regisice Type 0 tered Mail Restricted. 19 Certified Mail® Delivery i 9590 9403 0521 5173 2831 01 Certified Mail Restricted Delivery Retum Recelpt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise I ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirrnationTM 2. Article Number(transfer from service label) ❑Insured Mail ❑Signature Confirmation i ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery I (over$500) rill, I I PS Form 3811,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt I, I; Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services Richard V. Scali, Director Building Division BARN3TABIE BARNSTABI,E NAM �r�-CENnmur.mnn•inu)S nas vu u•.ne 1639. Thomas Perry, CBO 1639-201a�FD"AA�A Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 April 15, 2016 Mr. Bruce W. Waluck Mrs. Susan E. Waluck 22 Burning Tree Lane West Barnstable, MA 02668 Dear Bruce and Susan, It is spring and the runoff from your property is still flowing onto your neighbor's property. Enough time has passed for you to mitigate and contain the runoff on your property. You therefore are ordered to come up with an engineered plan and start work on that plan within_30 days of receipt of this letter. Furthermore, you are hereby ordered to satisfactorily complete the work within 60 days of receipt of this letter, If you choose not to act on this order or are unable to meet the deadlines imposed by this order further action will be taken by this office and serious repercussions should be expected. Thank you for your immediate attention, By Order, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector . Building Department 508-862-4033 Robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us , 'Town of Barnstable Y U.S.POSTAGE>)PITNEY BOWES Building'Department ,t e�•� 2'00 Main Street ";' ®® Hyannis 1 Qc BAR��SNIE :i S = ZIP 02601 $ 006.465 02 4w 0000336455 APR. 19. 2016. 7015 0640 0005 8489,8379ca T Cr' v, 4 Mr. Bruce W. Waluck Mrs. Susan PO Box 273E. Waluck ha/Q S Ole +! NsfXT tt,*T'� ro S: �`•P L1LOG /,:1 > i. Harvard, M L1 *.�„ Q z., • 13,_ _ , 0;,_6 ara -�r� c_njD�r� Ui`1CLAIMED UNABLE TO FORWARD Cilar I'IIIIIIIIIIIIII III I'IJ;I1,11II11I i1 Jill 1111.I11f 1111 y A -- 6ZEB_6Qth,Q_S❑E0_0_h9.❑STnI ' - • • •;WPL'ETE THIS SECTION ON DEL VERY # , y ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Agent so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee , ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery i or on the front if space permits. I 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes ' �-6tx—&— co r Yf f YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No 4�arva-r(5� , tl mow_ of qs-)-037 3.II I IIII'I I'll I'I I I I I I II I III I II I II III I'I ll I I Ill ❑dullsSignature 0 Signatuice re Delivery ❑Registered edlMail Restricted, It 9590 9403 0521 5173 2830 95 Certified Mail® Delivery I ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery K Retum Receipt for ' ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirrnationT" ❑Insured Mail ❑Signature Confirmation i r ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery IP (over$500 l `} PS Form 3811'April 2015 PSN.7530-02-000-9053 Domestic'Return Receipt Town of Barnstable oF +E Regulatory Services Richard.V. Scali,Director &MMSTABM ; Building Division BARNSTABLE i639, .• Thomas Perry, CBO 1639.201, Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 April 15, 2016 Mr. Bruce W. Waluck Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Mrs. Susan E. Waluck West Barnstable, MA 02668 PO Box 273 Harvard, MA 01451-0273 Dear Bruce and Susan, It is spring and the runoff from your property is still flowing onto your neighbor's property. Enough time has passed for you to mitigate and contain the runoff on your property. You therefore are ordered to come up with an engineered plan and start work on that plan within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Furthermore, you are hereby ordered to satisfactorily complete the work within 60 days of receipt of this letter, If you choose not to act on this order or are unable to meet the deadlines imposed by this order further action will be taken by this office and serious repercussions should be expected., Thank you for your immediate attention, By Order, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department 508-862-4033 Robert:mckechn ie@town.barnstable.ma.us �J. » , Town of Barnstable .' ASSa Building Department-200 Main Street , 1639; `0e Ea e Hyannis, MA 02601 Tel. (508) 862-4038 Certificate Of Occupancy Permit Number: B-2013-06534 CO Issue Date: 9/23/2016 Parcel ID: 136-025 Zoning Classification: RF Location: 22 BURNING TREE LANE, WEST Proposed Use: 1300 BARNSTABLE Gen Contractor: Permit Type: Residential - Comments: RUNOFF RETENTION AREA INSTALLED. EXCESSIVE RUNOFF APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED. SEE PICTURES. Building Official Date: 41 4 r+ R 11MV I may; y N ! o 1 .4 r ow �r SAW �V s ~ r � ,ems. , ,r R----�' TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Map l 3 6 Parcel 0 2S Application # Q/.> S J? Health Division . :20 3 3q oS Date Issued Conservation Division Application Fee Planning Dept. te° Permit Fee �? oZ�2(,a Date Definitive Plan proved by Planning Board 2G� Historic - OKH If _ Preservation / Hyannis 6.1A ►`` Project Street Address 22 V W"46 'TIEE L4+JE, OC-ST T"gt"Li MA Village tJe6T?fA)9t41C_ Owner Rudre`l Loy6,h4ANE Address 2I T°0,31 N L VJ 6rt' A)�aLU Telephone 108 _ 3 6 2- U T Z- I °:Permit Request arMd -M w,,4rruc Square feet: 1st floor: existing proposed 2,d 02nd floor: existing proposed % 0 Total new 3 y SO Zoning District RF Flood Plain 00 Groundwater Overlay Project Valuation 0 0OO Construction Type wooaTig-nb Lot Size IS: ZOO Grandfathered: 5/Yes ❑ No If yes, attach supporting documentation. Dwelling Type: Single Family ❑ Two Family ❑ Multi-Family (# units) Age of Existing Structure Historic House: ❑Yes ❑ No On Old King's Highway: LdYes ❑ No Basement Type: dFull ❑ Crawl ❑Walkout ❑Other Basement Finished Area (sq.ft.) Basement Unfinished Area (sq.ft) ZSO 0 Number of Baths: Full: existing new 2 Half: existing new Number of Bedrooms: existing 3 new Total Room Count (not including bath;): existing new 7 First Floor Room Count Heat Type and Fuel: ❑ Gas Li/Oil ❑ Electric ❑ Other Central Air: 2(Yes ❑ No Fireplaces: Existing New �_ Existing wood/coal stove: ❑Yes YNo Detached garage: ❑ existing ❑ new size_Pool: ❑ existing ❑ new size _ Barn: ❑ existing ❑ new size_ Attached garage: ❑ existing knew size Z Shed: ❑ existing ❑ new size _ Other: Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization ❑ Appeal # RecordedS Commercial ❑Yes YNo If yes, site plan review # ci ; c� Current Use Proposed Use APPLICANT INFORMATION (BUILDER OR HOMEOWNER) a j Name - PUC -W'L = Telephone"NUmber 7 g g02 (,(A7 Address?0 �-eok 7-73 License # CS ^ LAG 1 3 T7AfV 14,d , M iq 0) Home Improvement Contractor# Worker's Compensation # ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO T T7 - S73 - F 2-3 3 SIGNATURE W DATE S P/ b CYZ_ !f S 20 3 'z FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY . APPLICATION# f �DATE ISSUED MAP/PARCEL NO. 5 a ADDRESS VILLAGE 1 OWNER j zDATE OF INSPECTION: FOUNDATION 13 � 1 CJW } FRAME S�ijeai6��6���Ll �o� N��RAIL INSULATION o z t FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL: ROUGH FINAL t, PLUMBING: ROUGH FINAL GAS: ROUGH FINAL FINAL BUILDING ej/eJ sew .-r DATE CLOSED OUT ASSOCIATION PLAN NO. lD 0(11 AUG 9 PrU;46 BARNSTABLE TOWN CLERK Barnstable Old Kings Highway Historic District Committee SAXT•, 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601,TEL: 508-862-4787 Fax 508-862-4784 XAM t 19. APPLICATION, CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application is hereby made,with four(4)complete sets,for the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness under Section 6 of Chapter 470,Acts and Resolves of Massachusetts, 1973,for proposed work as described below and on plans,drawings,or photographs accompanying this application for: Check all categories that apply; 1. Building construction: Lod New ❑'Addition ❑ Alteration 2. Type of Building: WHouse ❑ Garage/barn ❑ Shed ❑ Commercial L96ther 3. Exterior Painting,roof ❑ new roof ❑ color/material change,of trim,siding,window,door 4. Sign_: ❑ New Sign ❑ Existing Sign ❑ Repainting Existing Sign 5. Structure: ❑ Fence ❑ Wall ❑ Flagpole ❑ Retaining wall ❑ Tennis court ❑ Other 6. Pool Swimming ❑ Other man-made pool ❑ Solar panels ❑ Other Type or Print Legibly: Date ', �L—� Z bt NOTE AU applications must be signed by the current owner `, p Owner(print): ��.-> � �"��� -Telephone#: Q 7 &'gs j C� T� Address of Proposed Work: 2�- *���� +;> � Village ��5� 'x- Tap Lot# Mailing Address(if different �►��/'��+� � Owner's Signature Descrip ' n of Proposed Work: Give particulars of work to be done: V`.1 G 0.2 1 to x t 4, ��o c, �ca.s t i Co >1 too Agent or Contractor(print): AN.ti E Ut G Him!t E 4 t Telephone#: 5 O E? Address: 2 E NAj A`1 E- T w tG6 4 Z 3 Contractor/Agent'signature: For committee use only. This Officate is hereby�P7 D/� ENIED RECEM-R,-i; Date d Members signatures aw- - •- JUL 0 3.2013 V , GROWTH MANAGEM APPROVE® JUN 2 4 2013 Town of Barnstable Old King%Highway 1 Comm,ttee QABoardc and Conunissions\Old Kings Highwa,A0KH Applications\OKH DRAFT 2011 Cert Appropriateness DRAFT.doc i • d CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS SPEC SHEET Please submit 5 copies Foundation Type: (Max. 12"exposed)(material-brick/cement,other) G cam-►eQt Siding Type: Clapboard— shingle '! other / Material: red cedar white cedar t/ other Color: Chimney Material: Color: Z Ec-'ZMi v Roof.Material: (make&style) Q�G Color: Roof Piteh(s): (7/12 minimum) 1 8 111Z_ (specify on plans for new buildings, major additions) Window and door trim material: wood other material,specify A--z-E►L x Size of cornerboards I "x rL size of casings(1 X 4 min.) color M1'-i`Te t' Rakes Ist member 1`�i n 2'member l X Depth of overhang I-L Window: (make/model) material eL.- -i> color k11-4 +TE (Provide window schedule on plats for new buildings, nutjor additions) Window grills(please check all that apply_: true divided lights_ exterior glued grills_ grills between glass removable'interior_ None Door style and make: -PL,,t`L wmaterial \,�CVQ Color: Garage Door,Style Size of opening X Material Color W hA CVIE Shutter Type/Style/Material: Fig C SS Etc C'z2t=.t3�(� Gutter Type/Material: ���'� Color: w T t/ JUN G� Deck material: wood other material,specify Color: Town of N�ghwaY Skylight,type/make/model/: material old C;ommAtetolor: Size: Sign size: Type/Materials: Color: Fence Type(max 6' )Style y t► '-(L_ Color: Retaining wall: Material: RECEN'D Lighting,freestanding on building '— illuminating sign JUL-0 3 2013 OTHER INFORMATION: NAGENENT THE ATTACHED CHECK LIST MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED Please provide samples of paint colors,manufacturers brochure of windows,doors,garage door,fences,lamp posts etc Signed: (plan preparer) Print Name titer t= i L H ty t l=- 4 lC°Z 2 Q.\Boards and Coitu))issionAOId Kings Highway\OKI]Applir.ations\OKFI DRAFT 20ll Cert Appropriateness DRAFT.doe I Pl ` all include the following: 7ame of applicant,street location,map and parcel. Name of Builder Designer,or architect;original signature of plan preparer and stamp;plan date;and all revision dates. ALL NEW HOUSE OR COMMERCIAL BUILDING PLANS MUST HAVE AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND STAMP,IF ANY,BY A REGISTERED ARCHITECT,MEMBER OF AIBD,OR A LICENSED MASSACHUSETTS HOME IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTOR,UNLESS THIS REQUIREMENT IS WAIVED BY THE OKH DISTRICT COMMITTEE. l A written and bar drawn scale. Elevations of all(affected)sides of the building„with dimensions including height from the natural grade adiacent to the building to the to of the ridge;location and elevation of finished grade,roof pitch(s)dormer setbacks;trim style,window and door styles. Changes-to existing buildings must be clouded on drawings. Window schedule on plans. ping plan,5 copies drawn on a certified perimeter plan containing the following information: me of applicant,street address,assessor's map and parcel number. a "Name,address and telephone number of the plan preparer;plan date and dates of revisioAP P RO V E he location of existing and proposed buildings and structures,and lot lines. J U N 2 4 2013 Natural features of site(e.g.rock outcroppings,streams,wetlands,etc.). Existin buffer areas to remain. Town of Barnstable g Old King's Highway Committee Location and species of trees outside of buffer areas greater than 12"caliper to be retained or removed. dle location,number,size and name of proposed new trees and plants. .Driveway,parking areas,walkways,and patios indicating materials to be used. Existing stone walls,and proposed walls including retaining walls for slope retention or septic systems. (for removal of stone walls,file Demolition Form). _All proposed exterior lighting and signs. Sketch or photos of adjacent properties,(1 copy only) A sketch(s)to scale or photographs of nearby adjacent buildings,where present,along both sides of the street frontage,showing the proposed new house or commercial building in scale and in relationship to the existing buildings. Please discuss with staff if you do not think this is relevant to your application. Photographs of all sides of existing buildings toremain,or being added to(1 set only). Fees according to schedule. RECEMD Please complete the following: JUL 0312013 Existing building,foot print: GROWTH MANAGEMENT Building I sq.ft. Building 2 Existing Building,gross floor area,including area of finished basement: Building 1 sq.ft. Building 2 New building or addition,foot print: Building 1 .5 (P y S QF1 sq. ft. Building 2 �J Co SQ I���"- 04)� New Building or addition, gross fl�_Or area,including area of finished basement: Building 1 3 4' Z sq. ft. Building 2 'L 4 Q.\Boaidc and Cornnussions\Old Kings Highway\OKH Applications1DK11 DRAFT 2011 Cert Appropriateness DRAFT.doc L_ 5. SIGNS Diagram of sign,showing graphics,size,design and.height of post,color and materials. Spec sheet. Site Plan on a GIS map or mortgage survey,OR photographs OR to-scale sketch of building elevation showing location of proposed sign;and any tree to be removed near a freestanding sign. Fee according to schedule. 6. SOLAR PANELS Drawing of location of panels on house showing roof and panel dimensions. Site plan showing location of building on property. (Assessors map may be submitted) Height of solar panel above the roof. Color of panels , 111 Finish(matt or glossy) 7. FOR LIST OF ABUTTERS: PLEASE SEE OKH STAFF 01�I�s W T H MAt4AGIt'eI NT SIGNED (plan preparer) Print ,,L. Date: — Zo t 3 Tel.Phone no's: Z 4—6�'6-7 NOTE The Old Kings Highway Historic District Committee MAY DENY INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS: If the applicant or his/her representative is not present during the hearing is scheduled,the application may be either CONTINUED OR DENIED APPEAL PERIOD APPROVED.PLANS PLAN PICK UP There is a ten(10)day appeal period,plus a 4 day waiting period for approved plans from the date the decision is filed with Town Clerk. This is necessary for each Certificate of.Appropriateness and/or Certificate for Demolition issued by the Old King's Highway Committee. Plans approved by the Old King's Highway Historic District Committee may be picked up at Growth Management,Regulatory Division,200 Main Street,Hyannis,after expiration of the 14 day"wait"period. If the l4d'day falls on a Saturday,your plans will be available the afternoon of the following business day. DENIALS Applications that are denied may be appealed to the,Old Kings Highway Regional Historic District Commission within 10 days of the filing of the decision with the Town Clerk. For more information, see the Bulletin of the Old Kings Highway District Commission. BUILDING PERMITS,OTHER AGENCY CONTACTS In most instances,before commencing work,a Building Permit is required. The Building Division will require a certified plot plan for new construction and/or demolition. Commercial work may require Site Plan approval. Demolitions: the applicant should check with the Building Division as to conformance with Zoning requirements. Other Regulatory Agencies at 200 Main St,Hyannis MA 02601: Building Division 508-862-4038 Conservation Division 508-862-4093 Health Division 508-862-4644 QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR APPLICATION? PLEASE CALL THE BARNSTABLE OLD KINGS HIGHWAY OFFICE AT 508 862-4787 APPROVE® JUN 24 2013 5 Q:\Boards and Contra ission.A01d Kings 11ighway\0KH AppiicationAOKH DRAFT 2011 Cert Appropriateness DRAF aloe Town of Barnstable Old King's Highway Committee Town of Barnstable Geographic Information System July 5,2013 m 136011002 136009 c #s #91360081 n r{3as � a 13som #339 136052 136006 #380 #0 k360314002 Sandw/eh50 136014001 . #330 �Bq G .5PNgr N� z 1#003 -� 136026 S. 136025 #42 136016 r #22 #7 p O 136024 #26 136017 'fit ti N 136066 # NtNG 136027 36028 ® gUR #as #25 1 #zs 136018 136029 136057 #43 #52 #44 136005 Fty #7 136031 136032 #19 1 #44 136033 # 136003 136019 136030 # #68 136034 #29 136002 #91 #70 #74 7et #44 DISCLAIMERS:This map Is for planning purposes only. It Is not adequate for legal Map:136 Parcel:025 a boundary determination or regulatory Interpretation. Enlargements beyond a scale of Selected Parcel 1"=100'may not meet established map accuracy standards. The parcel lines on this map Owner:LOUGHNANE,AUDREY M Total Assessed Value:$401000 are only graphic representations of Assessor's tax parcels. They are not true property Co-Owner: Acreage:0.80 acres Abutters •:•:.;.::; E boundaries and do not represent accurate relationships to physical features on the map Location:22 BURNING TREE LANE // such as building locations. Buffer rf r TOWN OF BARNSTABLE OLD KING'S HIGHWAY HISTORIC DISTRICT COI IMTTEE STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING -- -- .----------As-property-owner/contractorla ent for-the construction at:--- --- - -- ------- -___..-.- --- ---- ___.__._._--- No. Street Village Map Parcel no. 2. Only minor changes may be approved by the Committee without a new application and a hearing. Minor changes include things like moving a single window or door or a.minor change of color. All changes by amendment require the Committee's written approval. A request for change must be submitted to the Committee in writing. Approval must be obtained before incorporating the change into the project. For more than one revision to approved plans, a new application for a Certificate of Appropriateness must be applied for. Failure to comply with approved plans may result in the Building Department issuing a stop work order or denying an Occupancy Permit. I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE ABOVE STATEMENTS. - - 's Zo Signed: Date Owner/Contractor/Agent Signed: Chairperson,Old King's Highway C.(Documents and SettingsldecolliMocal SettingslTemporary Internet FilesIOLKIIOKH Statement of Understanding 07.doc Max Def Georfletown Gray . i r , GROWTH CHAIN LINK APPROVED r _ _ ._ ��!-•. �� ..yt'� ���t lam"r�,.,�7 �, i ;,�7 '�.� r'• '^ ram' jqb' '� • King s Highway Commiftee •f SOULS TEST LOG, DD ESMN C ALC UL AcKM S DATE OF TEST: OCTOBER 15. 2004 ' SOIL EVALUATOR: DAVID D. COUGHANOWR, LSE-461 DESIGN FLOW: 3 BEDROOMS X 110 GPD = 330 GPD WITNESSED BY: DONNA MIORANDI, HEALTH DEPT. SEPTIC TANK: 330 GPD X 2 DAYS = 660 GALLONS PERC NUMBER: 10821 INSTALL )500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK (MINIMUM ALLOWED) TEST PIT 1 NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED DISTRIBUTION BOX: USE 3 OUTLET D-BOX. 2 MIN/INCH IN C2 SOILS ELEVATION DEPTH SOIL USDA SOIL COL SOIL OTHER SOIL ABSORBTION SYSTEM: (FEET) (INCHES HOFQ TEXTURE GAUNSELD M0771M INSTALL 20 ADS ARC 36 HIGH CAPACITY BIODIFFUSERS 35.50 20 UNITS x 5.0 ft / UNIT = 100 L.F. 0-3 A LOAM l0 YR 2/2 NONE FRIABLE 100.0 L.F. x 4.80 S.F./L.F = 480.0 S.F. 3-20 B LOAMY SAND 10 YR 4/3 NONE FRIABLE 480.0 S.F x .74 G.P.D. / S.F. = 355.2 GPD 20-84 Cl SILT CLAY LOAM 10 YR 5/4 NONE FIRM USE 20 ARC 36 HC BIODIFFUSERS AS CONFIGURED BELOW 27.50 - Vt = 355.2 GPD ) 330 GPD REQUIRED 84-188 C2 MEDIUM SAND 10 YR 613 NONE LOOSE REFER TO DEP APPROVAL LETTER TRANSMITTAL 19.83 * X235253 FOR CERTIFICATION OF ADANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS BIODIFFUSER SYSTEMS. TEST PIT 2 PERCGROUNDWATER AT 110 W AT 2 MINA NCH IN EC SOILS p n q BOX ELEVATION DEPTH SOIL USDA SOIL COL SOIL OTHER W S T ROBV V OUV 191 OG1� (FEET) (INCHES)HORIZOIN TEXTURE MUNSELL) MOTRM DIMENSIONS AND DETAIL USE SHOREY DB-6 H-20 34.10 0-4 A LOAM 10 YR 2/2 NONE FRIABLE 4-22 B LOAMY SAND 10 YR 4/4 NONE FRIABLE NOT 22-90 Cl SILT CLAY LOAM 10 YR 5/4 NONE FIRM TO 16 in 26.60 SCALE 90-160 C2 MEDIUM SAND 10 YR 6/3 NONE LOOSE 2077 FROM c TANK TO co SAS Np.O> Ol A 6 in STONE BASE 1500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 24 2 CROSS SECTION VIEW DIMENSIONS AND DETAIL USE SHOREY ST-1500—H-10 .-NOT c� p c� �r �1► 1 in �. TO V O§L� A t�V OR U CONSTRUC�OUv TAPER y ION SCALE SYSTEM B DETAIL USE ADS ARC 36 HC BIODIFFUSERS GRAVEL FREE INSTALLATION - USE DEP 5 ft- APPROVED INSTALLATION PROCEDURES. 8 in INSPECTION 20.0 ft PORT „ \0 INSTALL O TWO AND 4-1 - ✓ f('L SHOW ON -I- !p ft-6 GJ AS BUILT u') CARD to INLET CENTER OUTLET COVER COVER COVER O �3 /N DROPUFLOW LINE --► 20 UNITS TOTAL - 5.0 ft PER UNIT FROM 10 /n _ 14 TO 48 In BUILDING j� D-Box CROSS SECTION VIEW LIQUID GAS LEVEL BAFFLE RESTORE VEGETATIVE COVER BACKFILL WITH CLEAN PERC SAND TO TOP OF CHAMBERS 6 in STONE BASE _ 1 ` I i SEPARATION BETWEEN INLET AND 161nch OUTLET TEES SHALL NOT EXCEED 10.75 In HI-CAP TOTAL DEPTH LIQUID DEPTH EFF DEPTH t2' UN1T5 / EXISTING SUITABLE CROSS SECTION VIEW MATERIAL - - - - _EFFECT-lVE .WIDTH =-S..x_2.875' _-i4.375'. Lo USE 20 ARC-36 HC ADS BIODIFFUSER UNITS-NO STONE NOTES 1) INSTALLER TO OBTAIN DISPOSAL WORKS PERMIT.BEFORE STARTING WORK. 2) ALL COMPONENTS INSTALLED SHALL MEET THE'MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SITE b SEWAGE DISPOSAL OF MASSACHUSETTS TITLE 5 SEPTIC CODE (310 CMR 15). 3) INSTALLER TO VERIFY LOCATIONS,OF ALL UNDERGRX)UND UTILITIES SYSTEM PLAN PAGE 2 OF 2 BEFORE EXCAVATING FOR SYSTEM. j 4) PIPES EXITING D-BOX TO RUN LEVEL FOR 2" FEET BEFORE PITCHING DOWN, SUSAN & BRUCE WALUCK 5) EC IXTURESE$VIPONANCES LAND'BIANNUAL PUMPING AOF TTHHE SEPTIC LOW TANK.FLOW 22 BURNING TREE LANE 6) SPARKM IS OR DRRIIVEDVEHIICILES OVER ED TO WITHSTAND LOADING. DO NOT WEST BARNSTABLE, MA 7) SEPTIC TANKS TO BE INSTALLED LEVEL AND TRUE TO GRADE ON A LEVEL STABLE BASE THAT HAS BEEN MECHANICALLY COMPACTED 8 ON TO WHICH SIX DUNE 29. 2013 ETE-1812 INCHES OF CRUSHED STONE HAS BEEN PLACED TO MINIMIZE UNEVEN SETTLING. NO OTHER WELLS WITHIN ISO ft OF 34 �� NOTES BEiVrH�Al1AROC THE PROPOSED LEACHING SYSTEM. TOP OF CONC BOUND 35 `q ^ni REMOVE ALL UNSUITABLE SOILS ENCOUNTERED ELEVATION = 36.00 ft t � � f. y % WITMN THE SOIL REMOVAL AREA FOR FIVE a LATERAL FEET DOWN TO THE C2 MEDIUM BARNSTABLE 0I5 DATUM 36 Q4.8 i c "� " y 'Skis Jt �, St* '��v SAND STRATUM AS INDICATED ON PLAN AND REPLACE WITH CLEAN MEDIUM SAND PER TITLE 5. 38 t �7 a t ADDITIONAL SURVEY MAY BE REQUIRED AFTER } 1, i ,7 n it .}i A pr r�' r l�l �'', CLEARING OF LOT. 5 fL i + �/ ic•ti +. ti, t1I'`��."$fvfi� a a -,�✓ �. 'dx w t U''Y 'SAS 'U+, 1 sC } ^ pVE, A�Fr� T4. F �•y1.�'r , M'. •c 'f d_:atFF THIS IS A 1 i k9 a 11' i. Y. i+� ,t �A• ' '� Yi r �_. ��,•�� 5.•`iSF �-h- j( ,�a p ®L�, O�l�9 � a y ,; > -t•'1•;,:•t� .,*'' - o PLAN Yt} i ek eII. F `34-Y CF "` S•••"Ft• • • ..+".v'!•, '-;s� �a:. h W t a.r r' 1 ; , .-• I � ;. FULL DETAIL IS BEST PROPOSED• VIEWED IN FULL COLOR ' USE COLOR PLAN ONLY N OX j TEST FOR SEPTIC INSTALLATION t��x SEE DETAIL. D-B PIT 2 `sz �SON BACK i • O 36 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ?� ft Ap v T�� �i O: ��4, ,S ,• J: o ZONE: RF-1 SOIL L z REM A J�. s , , ;• ; :32 FRONT: 30 ft ' FE SIDE: IS ft FEAR` �.. \�t� ry ;t,w, r.c REAR: 15 ft 10 SEPTIC TANK" 96Z O O m Q ,.� ..- act > k,.j`v�f�f�,.rgrs.+•{� tiy,t '� .� ..'i -w • �a: y� OA N `^rn ,�w i )i �, _ >b �jr�C�4 '� T ✓�" ti OWED •'�, •s'1'-rt'-'•!�',�S�SI��� '•�'' '. m at O O m �tk r i s'•�.i'�, ' �a_]�F "`x"� ar �.� r� � {.�+.�eTL�hpx:;n�i,�� '` - � r ,a 5 N-w • y 1 WE 36\ Y, �,a #,BARE 0� _ �6b 'PCL 25C 0. EXISTI 2 •"i q" �''� ` 11 ' je -f >iY'k• - i.-�'-_ �S4 e, •i�xN�w _ A.�,,^�tom. N a�°. •-A+, ,�¢��.r .. .•�%.y� �,.,n;�zr�'. 43, 7 to tti. ��,<ii+"' /pVEME 160.00 ft 3i� U 34 SCALE: 1 in = 30 ft up 36 U� 0 30 60 Lb a as iC_ FL0W RR" 0F LE 0 10 20 30 TOP OF FOUNDATION RAISE COVERS TO WITHIN ALL PIPE TO BE SCH. 40 PVC EL = 36.00 x in OF FINAL GRADE AND TO PITCH AT 1/8 In/ft MIN + 7 34.75 D-BO 3 ft INSPECTION USE H-20 AX PORT 33.25 1500 GALLON 31.75 SEPTIC TANK 32.50 6 in 3►.40 32.75 SEE DETAIL ON BACK STONE SOIL ABSORP�1®N + w 31.57 BASE 31.32 SY87-EM -SEE DETAIL o 10 ft 6 in STONE BASE 45 ft 3-10 ft ON BACK 30.42 NO GROUNDWATER LO WEST BARNSTABLE. MA MOTTLING OBSERVED — 19.83 po JP�Pa�, � 1N OF Mgss9c SH OF M4 �Gp-TFc SITE AND SEWAGE ° 0 0� ti� o� AV ti� y DISPOSAL SYSTEM PLAN ! N DAVID DID.o � �� -TO SERVE EXISTING DWELLING D. COUGHANOWR � D. SUSAN 81 BRUCE r COLIGHANOWR NOT No. 1093 • • WALUCK TO SCE sgC'ISTEPNO °��/EF"S��o� y��RoN���� 22 URNING TREE LANE 099'' .➢gy " �' WEST BARNSTABLE. MA �vrF yip 43 TRIANGLE CIRCLE PROPERTY ADDRESS a4 ti*4y v t%e ZCj F ZO ( 3 SANDWICH MA 02563 wTE JUNE 29. 2013 L O C US MAP 508 364-0894 p.1/2 1 -ago ETE-1812 �..v_ �� .■mow." �� -- 1 BMW ■.�:�. _��_■_ 0 poil oil foil ■�1� � _� ■;III ■_■_■_ u ■, :� ■��� [�No MIIA ■'�� �i� �■ . gym..: i "'' �I�,� 111[ ��1 �IMIM! . ME MEMO. I i i .ice. Y■�. ��+��- v . .T ACORP. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE F DATE(MM/DDIYYYY) 02/04/2014 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(les)must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Karen Bernier Southeastern Insurance Agency, Inc. P,,",CNN E,�: 508.997.6061 arcN„508 990.2731 439 State Rd. E-MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 79398 PRODUCER CUSTOMER ID#: North Dartmouth, MA 02747 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED INSURERA: Merchants Insurance Group Rons Excavating Inc. INSURERB: 81 Echo Road, Unit #1 INSURERC: Mashpee, MA 02649 INSURERD: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 024 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS LTR INSR WVD POLICY NUMBER MM1DD MMIDD GENERAL LIABILITY CMP914824 05/01/2013 05101/2014 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,00 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY DA PREMI SES MAGE S(Ea occurre RENTED nce) $ 100,001 CLAIMS-MADE a OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $ 5,00( A PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,00( GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,00( GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,00( POLICY jE O- LOC $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY MCA701391 08/16/2013 08/16/2014 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ (Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ 1,000,00C ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ 1,000,00C A X SCHEDULEDAUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE X HIREDAUTOS (Per accident) $ 1,000,00 X NON-OWNEDAUTOS $ UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAR CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION WCA909453 05/0112013 05/0112014 X ORY LA ITS X OT AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIQEUgJ $ 500,000 A OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? NIA - ry (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-,EA{EMPLOYE $ 5-9 ,00 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below NO OFFICER EXCLUSIONS E.L.DISEASE;POLICY LIMIT $ 560,000 4-4 00 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION 1 LOCATION I VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,If more space is required) 1 :� email: bruce.wa�luck@yahoo.com CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION CC+ � SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Bruce Wal uck AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 22 Burning Tree Lane Wet Barnstable, MA 02668 Karen Bernier ©1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2009109) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD � a= a COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE DISTRICT COURT BARNSTABLE DOCKET NO. _ NANCY F. GILL ) PLAINTIFF, ) V. ) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT OLD KING'S HIGHWAY REGIONAL ) HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION ) AUDREY LOUGHNANE AND } MICHAEL LONGO ) DEFENDANTS. ) PARTIES 1. Admit 2. Deny as to party, Proper Party is only the Old King's Highway Regional Commission, admit as individual. 3. Admit 4. Admit that Nancy Gill is one of the owners of 42 Burning Tree Lane, Barnstable. 5. Admit FACTS 6. Admit that 22 Burning Hill Ln., West Barnstable is subject to the jurisdiction of the Historic District Act, but deny that the property is totally unimproved. 7. Admit that Michael Longo is one of the parties who was considering to build a single family home at the premises. The size is neither admitted nor denied as the word "approximate" is vague and misleading. 8. Admit 9. Admit , 10. Admit J U N 2 7 2007 it 11. Admit COUNT 12. Defendant neither admits or denies #12 of Plaintiffs complaint. 13. Denies as Plaintiff is a stand in for another person based upon reasonable belief as Plaintiff's husband spoke against the project and was the party appealing decision of Barnstable Old King's Highway Commission. 14. Denied. The Commission acted at all times reasonable and deliberately and the action was considered, reasonable, and within the jurisdiction of the statute. St. 1973 c 470/ section 11. DEFENSES 1. The Plaintiff is estopped from making the claims before this court as the Plaintiff or their agent failed to make those claims in the hearing below. 2. The Plaintiff by the theory of res judicata can not bring the issues before this court because the Plaintiff or their agent waived their claims in the case below. 3.. The Plaintiff has waived their claims as they or their agents failed to make the claims made herein before the commission. 4. The acts of the Commission did not injure the Plaintiff in any fashion which would support the Plaintiffs claims. 5. The complaint does not provide substantial facts necessary to constitute with any certainty,the cause of action brought by the Plaintiff in violation of Mass. R. Civ. P. 8(a). COUNTER CLAIMS VIOLATION MASS, R. CIV. P. .11(a) 1. The Appellant before the Old King's Highway Historic District Commission of Barnstable was Joseph Gill and was represented by Attorney Butler who is representing Nancy Gill, Joseph Gill's wife in the case before the court. 2. Attorney Butler started his presentation before the Commission at 745PM and the } process took some 2 hours. I 3. The basis of the appeal before the Commission was that the local Barnstable Historic Commission exceeded their authority ,was arbitrary, and capricious. 4. During the totality of the hearing Attorney Butler never once explained how the decision of the Barnstable Historic Commission's was arbitrary, capricious or how the action exceeded the Commission broad authority. 5. Attorney Butler's current appeal fails to state how the Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Commission was at all capricious, whimsical, unreasonable, arbitrary or was based on legally untenable grounds. 6. The hearing before Old King's Highway Commission for Barnstable shows a reasoned, patient, and carefully considered decision which included each of those deciding the issue viewing the property and surrounding properties. 7. The Old King's Highway regional Historic District Commission Decision# 2007- 5 supplied to the court as part of the appeal shows a thoughtful articulate decision which allowed all parties to discus the issues and present their position. 8. Attorney Lynne Turner pointed out at the Hearing that the only issue before the Commission was if Town Committee acted capricious or arbitrary which was not responded to by Attorney Butler in any fashion. Page 5 of decision 2007-5. 9. As Attorney Butler failed to respond to or address the issue of if the Board acted in capricious or arbitrary manner in the decision below he has waived that issue on appeal. 10. The decision of the Barnstable Old King's Highway Commission, given it's broad discretion under the statute, was supported in their decision by the Regional Old L King's Highway Commission. 11. The arbitrary delay caused by this appeal brought by attorney Butler fails to show a subjective good faith belief that his pleading was supported in both fact and law given the broad discretion granted to the Commission. 12. The act of this appeal has extinguished the purchase and sales agreement and cost the purchaser and seller substantial sums of money,unnecessarily and without justification, and made the lot of questionable value given the attitude and acts of Attorney Butler. 13. Attorney Butler is an attorney who practices extensively in the area of Real Estate 3 Law and would reasonably know that the claim before the court was lacking merit. L 14.. Attorney Butler did not nor could not argue that the decisions of the local Barnstable Old Ding's Highway Commission was at all arbitrary or capricious and the pleadings before this court lacks any reasonable factual or legal support for the appeal. 15. Attorney Butler by this complaint has caused needless costs, loss of a reasonable real estate sale, cost of architectural fees and land development fees by the Defendants, Loughnane and Longo. 16, Attorney Butler by bringing this appeal has failed to show subjective good faith and given Attorney Butler's experience has injured Audrey Loughnane and Michael Longo and they have suffered substantial money damages. 17. Attorney Butler has violated.his duty pursuant to Mass R. Civ. P. 11(a) Therefore the defendant Audrey Loughnane requests this Honorable Court to dismiss the appeal and award money damages to be paid by Attorney Butler to the Defendants for their legal expenses, fees, land development costs and architectural expenses for his will full violation of Mass. R. Civ. P. 11(a)as his pleading is not a good faith pleading nor is it supported in fact or law. The Defendant, AUDREY LOUGHNANE By h Michael W. T er �� o Attorney at Law Post Office Box 910 Marion, Ma. 02738 BBO# 565820 508-748-2362 Certi:cafe of Service I, Michael W. Turner, do hereby certify that the Answer to the Complaint was served to Patrick M. Butler, attorney for the Plaintiff,Robert Smith, attorney for the Town of Barnstable, James Wilson and Leslie Anne Morse, attorney's for Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Commission, and Philip Liston-Kraft, this 27'day of June, 2007 via facsimile and regular mail de 've Michael W. Turner,fsq. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Design of Beam 1: BEAM #5 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.02 I Slope 0 in 12 code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.01001 I Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) 0 I Grade : 2.0E Rep. use : No I TL Deflection L/300 I Tri.b. width : 15' -0" ' Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading Yes I side Loaded : No SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 114' -6" Actual 114' -7.25" Brg. 2.5" 0" Min. 1.5" 1.5" . Total Length : 14' -7.25" MEMBER SELECTED Generic LVL 2.0E 1.75x11.875x2 - IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In A2) I ( K /In A2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE ( 3.264 I 1.726 I 0.10171 I -0.305 I -0.458 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 58 I 35 I 63 I 79 LOCATION I 0" I 7'-3" 113' -6.125" I 7' -3" I 7' -31' MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 3.264 K (LEFT) 3.264 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 11.88 In. Deep ----------------------------------------------------------- I I - 3264 lbs Max. 3264 lbs Max. 1089 lbs DL 1089 lbs DL 2175 lbs LL 2175 1 LL 3.3 K K o General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end PT ° �qss of the structure. s 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are BsHoa°' m measured from the left end of the structure. STRuCTu Rqt. v 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. NO.z948g 5. structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. �0S��/STEREG 6. Bearing l engths required may be l i mi ted by bearing stress on TONAL ENG�N supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice: the span length. • � �-c' . ,]� � ��(�• `, a '. '! !:('; �!' +tf_`"`•a - '�;,� � fib � r � r •, ce / .. ._. -�. . v _�Cam^`. Q'•. .„TM C;3 O o rl Aq 7, TOO � tG; �' � yr- � '` '�J.. � �,.' � it•1� . ..',rlY 'r ' -------=-------------------------------=---------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Design of Beam 1: BEAM #3/#4 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K./Ft A2) : 0.7 I Slope 0 in .12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.35 ( Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade : 2.0E Rep. Use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I Side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 114' -6" Actual 114' -7.25" Brg. 2. 5" 0 11, Min. 1.933" 1.933" Total Length : 14' -7.25" MEMBER SELECTED Generic LVL 2.0E 1.75x14x3 . IS MEMBER OK? : Yes . CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In ^2) I ( K /In A2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 7.613 I 1.931 I 0.13036 I -0.290 I -0.435 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 67 I 45 I 59 I 74 LOCATION I 0" I 7' -3" I 13' -4" I 7' -3" I 7' -3" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 7.613 K (LEFT) 7.613 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ In. Deep ------------------------------------------------------------ 7613 lbs Max. 7613 lbs Max. 2538 lbs DL 2538 lbs DL 5075 lbs LL 5075 lbs LL 7.6 K 7.6 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end of the structure. j MASS 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are 9°ti�N measured from the left end of the structure. B;S o° 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. STRUCTURAL C S. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. NO.29488 6. Bearing lengths required may be 1 i mi ted by bearing stress on ��� �FGISTEIR' supporting members. FSSIONAL ENG\� y, 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. .,F i..i ff fi' 1., 1 i� i. '�1Ir1 r • ' 1f'. � .. +- �._ , y tl . 1, • 1 Cti• Ley..+ ! �t. f+ i r •r.r `� r� f 7••• + j �� .' ca SJr] , t CJ E5 - ® r r - rL r l+� *�'' %•y !` rLeL _ Pt is It I, --------------------------------------- - Design of Beam 1: BEAM #3/#4 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.7 ( Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.35 I Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2.) : 0 ! Grade Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1'-0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I Side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) SPAN 1 Length 114' -6" Actual 114' -7.25" Brg. 2. 5" 0" Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 14' -7.25" MEMBER SELECTED Steel wF W8x21 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL MAX VALUE I ( K7.613 I ( K /-18.19 I.In A2) ( K /13.678 j In) In) I ( -0.478 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 76 I 25 I 65 I 82 LOCATION I o I 71 -311I o I 7 -3 I 7 -3 11 MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 8.28 In. i Deep ---------------------------------------- ------------------ 7613 lbs Max. 7613 lbs Max. 2538 lbs DL 2538 lbs DL 5075 lbs LL 5075 lbs LL 7.6 K 7.6 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end �� ° Sol of the structure. o=S °y�� 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are o W1 P A measured from the left end of the structure. STRUCTURAL cn 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. NO.29488 5. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. 6. Beari n 1 en the required red may be 1 i mi ted b bearing stress on �FSSG/STER�G�� /) g, 9 4 Y Y g S/°NAL supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened 3 to the support to resist uplift. 8. Cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. r e i ;ol t`�-' 4 / ..t t� _f rll�c;, t-.• 1.t.0 �: o:.� � •n '(t •tt �r `%. cr_ • cL- �" � t ►`�"°` 1� ._ �fit. , `� . N i y T, 1, Design of Beam 1: BEAM #3/#4 ------ -- INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.7 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load .( K /Ft A2) : 0.35 I Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade . Rep. Use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I Side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 114' -6" Actual 114' -7.25" Brg. 2.5" 0" .Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 14' -7.25" MEMBER SELECTED Steel WF W10x17 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL C K ) IC K /In ^2) IC K /In ^2) I C In) I C In) MAX VALUE I 7.613 I -20.44 I 3.137 I -0.293 I -0.440 OF ALLOW I n/a I 86 I 21 I 60 I 75 LOCATION ( 0" I 7' -3" I 0" I / ' -3" I 7' -3" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ I 10.11 In. Deep ----------------------------------------------------------- 7613 lbs Max. 7613 lbs Max. 2538 lbs DL 2538 lbs DL 5075 lbs LL 5075 lbs LL 7.6 K 7.6 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end f ASS of the structure. 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are = measured from the left end of the structure. z w�e`SN°P N 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. 511111 8 2.988,.. c� STRUC 5. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. "°" 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on Ago REGISI supporting members. FESSIONP� l� 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. Cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. I Cam' co .3 w C ES [•~ -40 c V 3t !•t r T M -------=------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Design of Beam 1: BEAM #2 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.7 I slope 0 in 12 code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.35 I species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I side Loaded : No SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 120' -6" Actual 120' -7.25" Brg. 2.5 0" Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 20' -7.25" MEMBER SELECTED Steel wF W10x39 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In ^2) I ( K /In ^2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 10.76 I -15.72 I 3.444 I -0.459 I -0.688 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 66 I 23 I 67 I 83 LOCATION I 0" I 10' -3" I 0" I 10' -3" I 10' -3" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 9.92 In. Deep ------------------------------------------------------------ I- 1.076e+004 lbs Max. 1.076e+004 lbs Max. 3588 lbs DL 3588 lbs DL 7175 lbs LL 7175 lbs LL 11 K 11 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assu �yGs med to be included in Dead Load. o MSSq 2. Load locations given are-measured from the left end of the structure. _ P o• FN 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are `B,SN S 0. measured from the left end of the structure. 0 Sig, A S 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. N° Z0 5. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. AQOFREGIS�����\� 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on ESS10tA supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. rr � + Cd�a 1 �,_ ,� �1•:'v'•1 .. � v + 't' ,+t 1 �" .!`t• LL- 1 , IJ , ,. r -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Design of Beam 1: BEAM #2 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.7 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.35 I Species wet use : No i Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade Rep. Use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I Side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 120' -6" Actual 120' -7.25" Brg. 2.5 0" Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 20' -7.25" MEMBER SELECTED Steel wF w12x26 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In ^2) I ( K /In ^2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 10.76 I -19.82 I 3.829 I -0.470 I -0.705 OF ALLOW I n/a I 83 I 26 I 68 I 86 LOCATION i 0" I 10' -3" I 0" I 10' -3" I 10' -3" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K (RIGHT) -----------------------7------------------------------------ 12.22 In. Deep -------------------------------------- lbs Max. 1.076e+004 lbs Max. 3588 lbs DL 3588 lbs DL 7175 lbs LL 7175 lbs LL 11 K 11 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. F ,A 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end A�HGs of the structure. o• A 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are P measured from the left end of the structure. o s R\'°z9R Qeb 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. 5. structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. A REGISI���� 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on `fssv4 ` supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. • 1, .4', �"-..�' _� .•r� ', _� �;� Cy y�.�7 � '�'«fir. f�'(_r� r ,.�ry•`'. � � f n tJ� her 1 rr<< _ .•r�'.i ♦ r�i• �; t _ N 1 J i ? ' rr Ll i } l � „ 1 L 33L r any SIC ( � `• a ` i ���'.� : r JJ 4 s i -I! D+ OCiR' 1 `'' J. r ---------------------------------------------------------------- Design of Beam 1: BEAM- #1 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 1 I Slope 0 in 12 code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0. 5 I species wet use : No I snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade Rep. use . No I TL Deflection L/300 I Trib. width . 1' -0" l.t. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/36O I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) SPAN 1 Length 120' -6" Actual 120' -7.25" Brg. 2. 511. 0" Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 20' -7.25" MEMBER SELECTED Steel WF W1Ox49 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION ( BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL C K ) I ( K /In ^2) I ( K /In A2) I C In) I C In) MAX VALUE I 15.38 I -17.32 I -4. 531 I -0.504 I -0.756 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 72 I 31 I 73 I 92 LOCATION I 20' -6" I 10' -3" I 20' -6" I 10' -3" I 10' -3" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K (RIGHT) ------------------7----------------------------------------- I I ' 9.98 In. I I Deep I ------------------------------------------------------------ 1.538e+004 lbs Max. 1. 538e+004 lbs Max. 5125 lbs DL 5125 lbs DL 1.O25e+004 lbs LL 1.O25e+004 lbs LL 15 K 15 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. F ASSq�yGs 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end S, o. �A of the structure. 5�� P� N 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are a R measured from the left end of the structure. s�No 29°e$ 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. A REGISS�������� 5. structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. PfSS10W\N1 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on supporting members. �I 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. Cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. s , 7 co- t.i' ,CT 'f' 7.� .c.! 1. i f + i r ►T 1 CD IL '1 �'•� ` 4 ' , � i s 11 1 ram.. rr r- v . J♦ v 1 i/•., 1 'E. 'ter) � ��r+,t� � k+ - , r -t I ,�,'.,t . r4 fJ F.3>f' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Design of Beam 1: BEAM #1 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 1 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.5 I Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : . 0 I Grade Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 120' -6" Actual 120' -7.25" Brg. 2.5" 0" Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 20' -7.25" MEMBER SELECTED Steel WF W12x35 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL I C K ) IC K /In ^2) IC K /In ^2) I C In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 15.38 I -20.74 I -4.1 I -0.481 I -0.721 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 87 I 28 I 70 I 87 LOCATION I 20' -6" I 10' -3" I 20' -6" I 10' -3" I 10' -3" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 12. 5 In. l Deep ------------------------------------------------------------ 1.538e+004 lbs Max. 1. 538e+004 lbs Max. 5125 lbs DL 5125 lbs DL 1.025e+004 lbs LL 1.025e+004 lbs LL 15 K 15 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end O Assq�ti of the structure. Gs�� 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are o' N measured from the left end of the structure. o Boo VRA� 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. STNo.z9as$ 5. structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. �o 'O �'EGISSE� V\ 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on �oF supporting members. ESSIONP 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. wt- Crf 1 �S ram+•'^ 1 • .i ♦ � �� UC sic , j Ut ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Design of Beam 1: BEAM #6 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.04 I slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.01501 I Species Wet Use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) 0 I Grade : 2.0E Rep. Use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 10' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I Side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 112' -0" Actual 112' -1.25" Brg. 2.5" 0" Min. 1.5" 1.5" Total Length 12' -1.25" MEMBER SELECTED Generic LVL 2.0E 1.75xi1.875x2 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR ( LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In ^2) i ( K /in ^2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 3.301 I 1.444 i 0.099473 I -0.191 I -0.263 OF ALLOW I n/a I 49 I 34 I 47 I 54 LOCATION I 0" I 6' -0" I 11' -.125" I 6' -0" I 6' -0" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 3.301 K (LEFT) 3.301 K (RIGHT) ------------ ----------------------------------------------- 11.88 In. Deep i ------------------------------------------------------------ 3301 lbs Max. 3301 lbs Max. 900.6 lbs DL 900.6 lbs DL 2400 lbS LL 2400 lbs LL 3.3 K K General Notes OFMgSS 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. q"yG 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end ILL MO. of the structure. BI3 P 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are S NO.29488` measured from the left end of the structure. 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. �cFRFGISTEREO\�c� onaL E N 5. structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. SS/n 4 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on 1 supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. Cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. e• r . '�'_'.i �� { t. it . ' { . + _.{�•_ w • 1 4't} i , '11 j - 1 � .2 y - - -- M J "ter, ,1) :.- 1=. rf l !I f r CDP—t s •1. 1 1_ j . 1 1 ,. •r •. i � r ��. J��. , "' ,' �("i� 1 �_ '�1 YID.. Design of Beam 1: BEAM #7 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.04 I Slope 0 in 12 code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.01501 I Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) 0 I Grade : 2.0E Rep. Use : No I TL Deflection L/300 I Trib. width : 10' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N ( Pattern Loading Yes I side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 116' -0" Actual 116' -1.25" Brg. 2.5" 0" Min. 1. 5" 1.5" Total Length : 16' -1.25" MEMBER SELECTED Generic LVL 2.0E 1.75x11.875x3 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In ^2) I ( K /In ^2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 4.401 I 1.712 I 0.092786 I -0.403 I -0. 554 OF ALLOW I n/a I 58 I 32 I 75 I 86 LOCATION I 0" I 8' -0" I 15' -425" I 8' -0" I 8' -0" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 4.401 K (LEFT) 4.401 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ I 11.88 In. Deep ------------------------------------------------------------ I 4401 lbs Max. 4401 lbs Max. 1201 lbs DL 1201 lbs DL 3200 lbs LL 3200 lbs LL 4.4 K 4.4 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end °tip of the structure, t o 81 OP. 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are STRu TURAL measured from the left end of the structure. NO.29488 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. RFGISTEREO 5. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. FSSIONALENG\� 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. _ t"C. ►S..}. '.C1^4 , !�_ (?� :1� `��r t .`� �rJ. I !.s. �..a � � , r � .'� - 1 .CtJ' ' "i � �i�. � ,.1• _ "��• l;l,xi t 1� ,�6� ` ` !':�! � / ; sr i C+a Tq "1 i 4`t rl r r• Design of Beam 1: BEAM #7 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.04 I Slope 0 in 12 Code UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.01501 I Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Tri.b. Width : 10' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I Side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 116' -0" Actual 116' -1.25" Brg. 2.5" 0" Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 16' -1.25" MEMBER SELECTED Steel WF W8x15 IS MEMBER OK? Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In ^2) I ( K /In A2) I ( In) I ( In). MAX VALUE I 4.401 I -17.9 I 2.215 I -0.424 I -0. 583 OF ALLOW I n/a I 75 I 15 I 79 I 91 LOCATION I off I 8' -0ll I off I 8' -01, I 8' -011 MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 8.11 In. I Deep I i ------------------------------------------------------------ I I 4401 lbs Max. 4401 lbs Max. 1201 lbs DL 1201 lbs DL 3200 lbs LL 3200 lbs LL 4.4 K .4 K General Notes �I OFMq 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. �:�� Ss�c 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end ��g �o WILLIAM O. of the structure. �c� BISHOP 3. Locations of maximum moment, N0.29488 stress and deflection are STRU N 9488 measured from the left end of the structure. 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. SOS ERSP 5. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. EN L 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. Cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. i • , I. y i•,, r r r I CN ` - CO + ^ •O i s Ow r + r i t. GP Ci?_ � ,w-+ I i- ? y • •i1. r �.�; :i ��b t.} i . +.l } ® F-5 n ,� ri IY.�� :'.. _ _ -. t i �]C r .l.r r rl �r. + i•r { r .w.i -a1 r..(. C"{�tl� 11,`1 (''_I.�r•�, 9 �',Z '�� ' r ., !�t r -ri.J .L 1 '�V� •,-• - .1 r a� l.' 1 y � 1J ( i � r t' ! �-. `• y �1 _ I � Cif ��(� �` i; �:�� ;� � _ .. r J •�.i : l i +'��+ l �; r ' VIVI r `� j ,< � _ � �� -. . L� TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Building Department - Foundation Permit Date Permit # 20130653 � Name Jot#cviv*jue I WALKLk Location 2 2 Bwkwimc Vve LAuE W t3 Insp. of Bldgs.. 5 9�8 6515 MBLU 136-025 22 BURNING TREE LANE SARNSTABLF, MA Nam, 0 0 Jp016 of N U0 Z5¢ �� 0 c12 0. 5 NEW o N� FOUNDATION o�8 LO �,� 200 380 .o Yo 46 U 00 .00 160 00 REE L PNE. �G vRN� B FOUNDATION AS-BUILT PLAN WALKUCK RESIDENCE I CERTIFY THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN of 22 BURNING TREE LANE HAVE BEEN LOCATED BY A FIELD SURVEY. ��` .4 BARNSTABLE, MA off' tiG DAIS: MAY 5, 2014 DRAWN: RBS a ROBB J' JOB NO. S033 c SYKES ', SCALE.1"=40' DWG. SURVEY No. 35418 EASTBOUND LAND SURVEYING o a 5�' P.O. BOX 442 ROBE SYKES, P.LS. DATE FORESTDALE, MA 02644 508-477-4511 ox•�+E Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services MASS. fig, Thomas F.Geiler,Director .r�;b ►` Building Division Thomas Perry,CBO,Building.Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 PLAN REVIEW 4p?# o / 3 0 e 5-3 Owner: �o ��h e Map/Parcel: 136 a2 5— Project Address Z?A daf,, G�re- lJf3 Builder: /RewrE "u.e.Ic The following items were noted on reviewing: 2 i` e ") �7�PNl '�7 OIy OKI-0 4C-:i?f#-,IG OrI46 'VoT 40,¢6 9 OFO-&x 6:-I-S I de -/Vp T sn'o wA! ON 114 Reviewed by: Date:— i 9�3 Q:Forms:Plnrvw' C The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department oflndustrialAccidents Office of In vestigad o n s I Congress Street, Suite 100 Boston,MA 02114-2017 www mass.gov/dia Workers'Compensation Insurance Affidavit: Builders/Contractors/Electricians%Plumbers Applicant Information -\ ` Please Print LeEibly Name (Business/Organization/Individual): `� ruGE W . WrtLo Jc Address: I q 4 StoiZ 2A CPO eck 2-73) City/State/Zip: TTWV A -rd M4 01L1,91 Phone#: 7 71� —8 U 7—6 01'7 Are you an employer? Check the appropriate b Type of project(required): 1.El am a employer with _ 4.appropriate a general contractor and I ,,�jemployees (full and/or part-time).* have hired the sub-contractors 6. [ New construction 21 [am a sole proprietor or partner- listed on the attached sheet. 7. ❑Remodeling ship and have no employees These sub-contractors have g. ❑Demolition working for me in any capacity. employees and have workers' 9. ❑Building addition [No workers' comp.insurance comp. insurance. required.] 5. ❑ We are a corporation and its 10.❑Electrical repairs or additions 3.❑ I am a homeowner doing all work officers have exercised their l 1.❑Plumbing repairs or additions myself. [No workers' comp. right of exemption per MGL 12.❑Roof repairs insurance required.] + c. 152,§1(4),and we have no employees. [No vmrkers' 13.❑ Other_ comp. insurance required.] *Any applicant that checks box 41 must also fill out the section below showing their workers'compensation policy information. t Homeowners who submit this affidavit indicating they are doing all work and then hire outside contractors must submit anew affidavit indicating such. Contractors that check this box must attached an additional sheet showing then ame of the sub-contractors and state whether or not those entities have employees. I the sub-contractors have employees,they must provide their workers'comp.policy number. I am.an employer that is providing workers'compensation insurance for n{y employees Below is the policy and job site information. Insurance Company Name: Policy#or Self-ins.Lic.#: Expiration Date: Job Site Address: City/State/Zip: Attach a copy of the porkers' compensation policy declaration page(showing the policy number and expiration date). Failure to secure coverage as required under Section 25A of MGL c. 152 can lead to the imposition of criminal penalties of a fine up to$1,500.00 and/or one-year imprisonment, as well as civil penalties in the form of a STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of up to$250.00 a day against the violator. Be advised that a copy of this statement may be forwarded to the Office of Investigations of the DIA for insurance coverage verification. I do hereby certify under thPe pains'gaud penalties ofperjury Mat the information provideod above its true and correct Signature: (//1 w • W Date: 344 QMJo& Phone#: 7, O ici sl use only. Do not write in this area,to be completed by cay or town ofrcial. City or Town: Permit/License# Issuing Authority(circle one): 1.Board of Health 2.Building Department 3. City/Town Clerk 4.Electrical Inspector 5.Plumbing Inspector 6.Other Contact Person: Phone#: (ki( LL -o Co o r/c ( ,i-k cc CE -S: 'R Massachusetts -Department of Public Safety Board of Building Regulations and Standard_s Construction Supervisor License: CS-069753 BRUCE W WALU�K ;. PO BOX 273 �N�} s Harvard MA 01431 /` Expiration Commissioner 12/06/2014 Unrestricted -Buildings of any use group which contain less than 35,000 cubic feet (991m3)of e enclosed space. i i Failure to possess a current edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code is cause for revocation of this license. For DPS Licensing information visit: www.Mass.Gov/DPS , Affidavit of Substantial Financial Interest Jr u 6E of ��ru , M , on oath depose and state as follows:.: 1. 1 am an applicant fora building permit for theproperty located at Map /3 , Parcel :.' The address of:the property is 2 �urli,o'arc--E 'Last. f� rn�.slabl�,rM F} 2. 1 .have o % legal or equitable interest in the real property which is the subject of the building permit application which is identified in paragraph 1 above.. 3:Within in the last twelvemonths from today's date, which is ten IS 2oi3., the following individuals or entities have had a 1% .or greater legal o equitable interest in the real property which is the subject of the building permit application which is identified in paragraph 1 above: Name Address Levh�J n-�k Z(o 1- 0 r a�' :`(�-�LL RJ c,�C�ET''av,Si"Lo,� 4. Within the last twelve months, from today's date, which is : a_ 18 W3, I have had a 1% or greater legal or equitable interest in the following properties which have been the subject of a building permit application: Map/Parcel. Address 5. Within this calendar year, I have submitted o building permit applications for. property in which I have a 1% or greater legal or equitable interest. ' 6. Within the last ten days, l have submitted o ' . building permit applications for property in which i have a-1% or greater legal or equitable interest. 7. Within this.month, I have submitted © building permit applications for property in . which I have a 1% legal or equitable interest. 8. Within this month, I have received o building permits for property in which I have a 1% legal or equitable interest. Zo I .:Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury, this 1 g day of 200_. 2001-W50/affin Q/LOTTERY/AFFIDAVIT. .� � ,• _ � '- � I � .. ': � .... ..:. _� I F ��� /' � .. G tl v n G ➢ G SDI tl p tl G ➢ v ➢ Effective Date: August 1st, 2013 G Western rCompany Sue ➢ G LICENSE AND PERMIT BOND G ➢ KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: Bond No. 61676347 ➢ e o G tl That we, Bruce Waluck a e n ➢ ➢ of Harvard State of Massachusetts , as Principal, ; ° and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, a corporation duly licensed to do surety business in the State of ° Massachusetts as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Town of Barnstable , State of Massachusetts as Obligee,in the penal sum of Six Hundred Forty and 00/100 DOLLARS($640.00 ) lawful money of the United States, to be paid to the Obligee, for which payment well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves and our legal representatives,firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That whereas, the Principal has been licensed Road Bond for 22 Burning Tree Lane, west Barnstable, MA Town of Barnsta by the Obligee. NOW THEREFORE, if the Principal shall faithfully perform the duties and in all things comply with the laws and ordinances, including all amendments thereto, pertaining to the license or permit applied for, then this obligation to be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect until August 1st - 2014 ,unless renewed by Continuation Certificate. This bond may be terminated at any time by the Surety upon sending notice in writing, by First Class U.S. Mail, to the Obligee and to the Principal at the address last known to the Surety, and at the expiration �` I"of thi s Pays from the mailing of said notice, this bond shall ipso facto terminate and the Surety shahs l �eupml.. %lieved from any liability for any acts or omissions of the Principal subsequent to said dad e ss.;6 the number of years this bond shall continue in force, the number of claims made a n is bo �iV::the number of premiums which shall be payable or paid, the Surety's total limit of lsa shall not �emulative from year to year or period to period, and in no event shall the Surety's total lij- rty �:a'' t�gai�ct��exceed the amount set forth above. Any revision of the bond amount shall not be t1'^N s 4 Cu b... •��Yo�y� 8 ibv o Dated his 6th day of May 2013 e 0 ➢ G ° Principal n G ➢ G ➢ G ➢ p Principal o G WESTE SURET COMPANY G ° G ➢ ➢ Bl J Paul T.Bruflat,gnior Vice President a p tl G Form 532-12-2011 ° v ➢ WESTERN SURETY COMPANY ONE OF —ERICA'S OLDEST RONDINC COMPANIES 2222�-: Mi G tl p tl ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SURETY STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA ss (Corporate Officer) COUNTY OF MINNEHAHA On this 6th day of May 2013 before me,the undersigned officer, personally appeared Paul T. Bruflat who acknowledged himself to be the aforesaid officer of WESTERN SURETY COMPANY,a corporation, and that he as such officer,being authorized so to do,executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained, by signing the name of the corporation by himself as such officer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and official seal. {4bbbb4444444444b4444444b+ 8 S. PETRIK s sS NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL L r 8 SOUTH DAKOTA r y Public—South Dakota +44444b44444444444444444� My Commission Expires August 11, 2016 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL STATE OF ss (Individual or Partners) COUNTY OF On this day of before me personally appeared known to me to be the individual_ described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that—he— executed the same. My commission expires Notary Public ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL STATE OF (Corporate Officer) COUNTY OF ss On this day of before me personally appeared who acknowledged himself/herself to be the of a corporation,and that he/she as such officer being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the name of the corporation by himself/herself as such officer. My commission expires Notary Public CL E " c� U o a z q q °D ° o a 04 i 0) W Z w ra o c ,.. a 0 a o 0 Western Surety Company POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That WESTERN SURETY COMPANY,a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of South Dakota,and authorized and licensed to do business in the States of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, and the United States of America,does hereby make,constitute and appoint Paul T. Bruflat of Sioux Falls State of South Dakota ,its regularly elected Vice President as Attorney-in-Fact,with full power and authority hereby conferred upon him to sign, execute, acknowledge and deliver for and on its behalf as Surety and as its act and deed,the following bond: One Road Bond for 22 Burning Tree Lane, West Barnstable, MA Town of Barnstable bond with bond number 61676347 for Bruce Waluck as Principal in the penalty amount not to exceed: $ 640.00 Western Surety Company further certifies that the following is a true and exact copy of Section 7 of the by-laws of Western Surety Company duly adopted and now in force,to-wit: Section 7. All bonds, policies, undertakings, Powers of Attorney, or other obligations of the corporation shall be executed in the corporate name of the Company by the President, Secretary,any Assistant Secretary,Treasurer,or any Vice President,or by such other officers as the Board of Directors may authorize. The President, any Vice President, Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, or the Treasurer may appoint Attomeys-i n-Fact or agents who shall have authority to issue bonds,policies,or undertakings in the name of the Company. The corporate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds,policies,undertakings, Powers of Attorney or other obligations of the corporation. The signature of any such officer and the corporate seal may be printed by facsimile. In Witness Whereof, the said WESTERN SURETY COMPANY has caused these presents to be executed by its Vice President with the corporate seal affixed this 6th day of May 2013 ATTEST WESTE N/ URET COMPANY By- L.Nelson,Assistant Secretary Paul ruflat,Vice President �!�®6ettbit��e•aeee�<<��sP C4 Ir. STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA ss COUNTY OF MINNEHAHA 0 lf�j8k09��1a�ttl6 ' On this 6th day of May 2013 before me,a Notary Public,personally appeared Paul T. Bruflat and L. Nelson who,being by me duly swom,acknowledged that they signed the above Power of Attorney as Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of the said WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, and acknowledged said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said Corporation. }bbbbbb4bbb444bbbbbbb4hbb} s S. PETRIK s a SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC SE L s a SOUTH DAKOTAe a }bbbbbbbb4b44bbbb444bbbb} My Commission Expires August 11,2016 Notary Public Form F1975-1-2012 I JOHN W. KENNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW 12 CENTER PLACE 1550 FALMOUTH ROAD CENTERVILLE,MASSACHUSETTS 02632 TELEPHONE 771-9300 FAX NO.775-6029 AREA CODE SOS e-mail:John@jwkesQ.com i May 31, 2013 Bruce Waluck and Susan Waluck P.O. Box 273 Harvard, MA 01451 Re: Opinion of Buildability Lot 10, Plan Book 249, Page 107 22 Burning Tree Lane, West Barnstable, MA 02668 Our File No. 13-74 _ Dear Mr. & Mrs. Waluck: You have asked me to render an opinion whether Lot 10 as shown on a plan recorded in Plan Book 249, Page 107 is a buildable lot for zoning purposes:_ In response to your request, I have caused the records at the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds to be researched. Based upon my review of the results of the search of the records at the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds it is my opinion that Lot 10 on a plan recorded in Plan Book 249, Page 107 is a buildable lot for zoning purposes. This opinion is based upon the following: 1. Lot 10 was created by a definitive subdivision plan approved August 16, 1971 and signed September 13, 1971 by the Town of Barnstable Planning Board. Said plan is recorded in the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds in Plan Book 249, Page 107. A copy of said plan is attached hereto for your reference. 2. The subdivision plan recorded in Plan Book 249, Page 107 is a subdivision of Parcel B shown on the plan recorded in Plan Book 246, Page 73: A copy of said.plan is attached hereto for your reference. 3. Parcel B on Plan Book 246, Page 73 was acquired by James Southwood and Robert W. Bridges by a deed dated May 19, 1971 and recorded with the Barnstable Registry of Deeds in Book 1511, Page 32. 4. James Southwood and Robert W. Bridges conveyed Parcel B to themselves as Trustees of Point Hill Realty Trust by a deed dated November 29, 1971 recorded in Book 1570, Page 125. i i Mr. & Mrs. Bruce Waluck May 31, 2013 Page 2 5. As of November 29, 1971, James Southwood and Robert Bridges, Trustees of Point Hill Realty Trust owned Lot 10 and abutting Lots 9 and 11 shown on the plan at Plan Book 249, page 107 in common. The two lots to the North abutting Lot 10 were not owned by Southwood and Bridges. 6. On January 31, 1975 Lot 10 was conveyed by a deed from Robert W. Bridges as Sole Trustee of Point Hill Realty Trust to Richard W. Grimm, Jr. and Katherine A. Grimm recorded in Book 2147, Page 21. 7. Lot 10 was again conveyed on October 28, 1977 by a deed from Richard W. Grimm, Jr. and Katherine A. Grimm to Katherine A. Grimm recorded in Book 2608, Page 149. 8. Lot 10 was conveyed to the current owner Audrey M. Loughnane by a deed from Katherine A. Grimm dated December 19, 1977 recorded in Book 2652, Page 61. 9. Abutting Lot 9 was conveyed by Robert W. Bridges as Sole Trustee of Point Hill Realty Trust to Robert Ward Bridges, Trustee of the Traditional Realty Trust by a deed.dated October 29, 1974 recorded in Book 2113, Page 294. Robert W. Bridges, Trustee of Traditional Realty Trust sold Lot 9 to Edward E. Lyons and Lucia O. Lyons by a deed dated March 3, 1975 and recorded in Book 2156, Page 281. Edward E. Lyons and Lucia O. Lyons conveyed Lot 9 to the current owner, John Loughnane and Audrey Loughnane by a deed dated January 31, 1977 recorded in Book 2462, Page 185. 10. Abutting Lot 11 was conveyed by Robert W. Bridges, Sole Trustee of Point Hill Realty Trust to Katherine A. Grimm and Richard W. Grimm, Jr. by a deed dated July 6, 1972 and recorded in Book 1684, Page 245. Katherine A. Grimm and Richard.W. Grimm, Jr. conveyed Lot 11 to Janice C. Leggatt by deed dated January 4, 1978 and recorded in Book 2644, Page 210. There have been eight additional conveyances of Lot 11 and none of the eight additional owners of Lot 11 ever held an interest in Lot 10. 11. A review of the records at they Barnstable County Registry of Deeds revealed that none of the owners from the 1960's to today of the two abutting lots to the north ever held an interest in Lot 10. r Mr. & Mrs. Bruce Waluck May 31, 2013 Page 3 Based upon the foregoing, it is my opinion that the conveyance described in paragraph 8 above conveyed Lot 10 into separate ownership in the name of Audrey Loughnane, individually. The conveyance into separate ownership took place during the seven (7) year plan protection period afforded by Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 6 in effect at the time. The lot has remained in.separate ownership since that conveyance and is therefore a legally grandfathered buildable lot for zoning purposes. The fart that Audrey Loughnane and John Loughnane have owned abutting Lot 9 as husband and wife tenants by the entirety since January31,. 1977 does not cause merger with Lot 10, separately owned by Audrey Loughnane, individually. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Very truly yours, ' ohn W, Kenney, E uire JWK:bp Enclosure I REScheck Software Version 4.4.4 Compliance Certificate Project Title: Energy Code: 2009 IECC Location: Barnstable,Massachusetts Construction Type: Single Family Project Type: New Construction Conditioned Floor Area: 3,450 ft2 Glazing Area Percentage: 12% Heating Degree Days: 6137 Climate Zone: 5 Permit Date: Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 22 Burning Tree Lane Bruce Waluck Anne Michniewicz West Barnstable,MA PO Box 273 Sandwich,MA Harvard,MA 01451 978-807-6017 brucewaluck@yahoo.com ,Compliance: Compliance: 1.1%Better Than Code Maximum UA: 558 Your UA:552 The%Better or Worse Than Code Index reflects how close to compliance the house is based on code trade-off rules. It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum-code home. Envelope Assemblies Gross Cavity Cont. Glazing Assembly Area or or Door UA Ceiling 1:Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 2,350 30.0 11.0 59 Ceiling 1 copy 1:Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 150 30.0 0.0 5 Wall 1:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 4,175 21.0 0.0 207 Window 1:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 327 0.330 108 SHGC:0.00 Window 2:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 76 0.320 24 SHGC:0.00 Window 3:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 39 0.310 12 SHGC:0.00 Window 4:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 14 0.190 3 SHGC:0.00 Door 1:Solid 28 0.140 4 Door 2:Glass 21 0.340 7 SHGC:0.00 Door 3:Glass 42 0.320 13 SHGC:0.00 Floor 1:All-Wood Joist/Truss:Over Unconditioned Space 2,500 21.0 0.0 1.10 Project Title: Report date: 09/18/13 Data filename: C:\Documents and Settings\usd04O38\My Documents\REScheck\BurningTree.rck Page 1 of 8 r Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans,specifications,and other calculations submitted with the permit application.The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2009 IECC requirements in REScheck Version 4.4.4 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. Name-Title Signature Date Project Title: Report date: 09/18/13 Data filename: C:\Documents and Settings\usd04O38\My Documents\REScheck\BurningTree.rck Page 2 of 8 REScheck Software Version 4.4.4 Inspection Checklist Requirements: 100.0% were addressed directly in the REScheck software Text in the"Comments/Assumptions"column is provided by the user in the REScheck Requirements screen. For each requirement,the user certifies that a code requirement will be met and how that is documented,or that an exception is being claimed.Where compliance is itemized in a separate table,a reference to that table is provided. 2009 IECC Pre-Inspection/Plan Review Plans Verified Field Verified Complies? Comments/Assumptions Value Value 103.2 ;Construction drawings and ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [PR1]' documentation demonstrate energy ❑Does Not Comply ® ;code compliance for the building ❑Not Observable envelope. ❑Not Applicable 103.2, :Construction drawings and ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. 403.7 :documentation demonstrate energy ❑Does Not Comply: [PR3]' code compliance for lighting and ❑Not Observable mechanical systems.Systems serving ❑Not Applicable ; ;multiple dwelling units must demonstrate compliance with the :commercial code. 403.6 Heating and cooling equipment is Heating: Heating: E]Complies ;Requirement will be met. [PR2]2 sized per ACCA Manual S based on Btu/hr Btu/hr :❑Does Not Comply loads per ACCA Manual J or other ; Cooling: Cooling: QNot Observable approved methods. Btu/hr Btu/hr :❑Not Applicable ; Additional Comments/Assumptions: 11 High Impact(Tier 1) 12 1 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Report date: 09/18/13 Data filename: C:\Documents and Settings\usd04038\My Documents\REScheck\BurningTree.rck Page 3 of 8 2009 IECC Foundation Inspection Complies? Comments/Assumptions 303.2.1 A protective covering is installed to ;❑Complies ;Exception:Requirement is not applicable. [FO11]2 protect exposed exterior insulation ;❑Does Not Comply U and extends a minimum of 6 in.below ❑Not Observable grade. :❑Not Applicable 403.8 Snow-and ice-melting system ;❑Complies ,Exception:Requirement is not applicable. [FO12]2 controls installed. ❑Does Not Comply 14 ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: i r 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Report date: 09/18/13 Data filename: C:\Documents and Settings\usd04038\My Documents\REScheck\BurningTree.rck Page 4 of 8 I 2009 IECC Framing/Rough-In Inspection Plans Verified Field Verified Complies? Comments/Assumptions Value Value 402.1.1, ;Door U-factor. ; U- ; U- ;❑Complies ;See the Envelope Assemblies table for 402.3.4 ; ; ❑Does Not Comply values. [FR1]' ; ;❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.1.1, ;,Glazing U-factor(area-weighted ; U- ; U- ;❑Complies ;See the Envelope Assemblies table for 402.3.1, average). :❑Does Not Comply:values. 402.3.3, '❑Not Observable [FR2] T❑ ' ' Not Applicable FR2] I ' , 303.1.3 ;U-factors of fenestration products are ❑Complies ,Requirement will be met. [FR4]' determined in accordance with the ❑Does Not Comply NFRC test procedure or taken from ❑Not Observable ; ;the default table. ❑Not Applicable 402.3.5 U- U- ;❑Com lies ;Exception:Requirement is not ;Sunrooms enclosing conditioned p p q [FR8]' space have a maximum fenestration :❑Does Not Comply:applicable. ® U-factor of 0.50 in Climate Zones 4-8. ;❑Not Observable ' ;New glazing separating the sunroom ; ❑Not Applicable from conditioned space must meet :code requirements. 402.3.5 ;Sunrooms enclosing conditioned ; U ; U- ;❑Complies ;Exception:Requirement is not [FR9]' :space have a maximum skylight U- ❑Does Not Comply:applicable. factor of 0.75 in Climate Zones 4-8. :[-]Not Observable ; ❑Not Applicable 402.4.4 ;Fenestration that is not site built is ❑Complies ;,Requirement will be met. [FR20]' "listed and labeled as meeting ❑Does Not Comply jAAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440 or ❑Not Observable ; :has infiltration rates per NFRC 400 that do not exceed code limits. [:]Not Applicable 402.4.5 IC-rated recessed lighting fixtures ❑Complies :Requirement will be met. [FR16]2 sealed at housing/interior finish and ❑Does Not Comply 1 BJ labeled to indicate 2.0 cfm leakage at ❑Not Observable 75 Pa. ❑Not Applicable 403.2.1 ;Supply ducts in attics are insulated to ; R- ; R- ;❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [FR12]' R-8.All other ducts in unconditioned R_ R_ UDoes Not Comply ;spaces or outside the building ; :[]Not Observable ; ;envelope are insulated to R-6. ; :❑Not Applicable , 403.2.2 :All joints and seams of air ducts,air ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [FR13]' :handlers,filter boxes,and building ❑Does Not Comply ;cavities used as return ducts are ❑Not Observable ; ;sealed. 1[]Not Applicable 403.2.3 113uilding cavities are not used for ❑Complies :Requirement will be met. [FR15]3 supply ducts. ❑Does Not Comply g ❑Not Observable ; ❑Not Applicable 403.3 HVAC piping conveying fluids above ; R- R- ;❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [FR17]z 105 IF or chilled fluids below 55 IF I :❑Does Not Comply v are insulated to R-3. ; ;❑Not Observable ; ❑Not Applicable 403.4 Circulating service hot water pipes are; R- R- ;❑Complies :Requirement will be met. [FR18]2 insulated to R-2. :❑Does Not Comply V ; ; '❑Not Observable ; ❑Not Applicable 403.5 Automatic or gravity dampers are ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [FR19]2 installed on all outdoor air intakes and ❑Does Not Comply 49) exhausts. ❑Not Observable ; IE]Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 11 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Report date: 09/18/13 Data filename: C:\Documents and Settings\usd04O38\My Documents\REScheck\BurningTree.rck Page 5 of 8 I 2009 IECC Insulation Inspection plans Verified Field Verified Complies? Comments/Assumptions Value Value 303.1 All installed insulation is labeled or the ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [IN13]2 installed R-values provided. []Does Not Comply ❑Not Observable ; ❑Not Applicable 402.1.1, :Floor insulation R-value. ; R- ; R- ;❑Complies ;See the Envelope Assemblies table for 402.2.5, ❑ Wood ;❑ Wood PDoes Not Comply:values. 402.2.6 ❑ Steel ❑ Steel ❑Not Observable [IN1]' :0Not Applicable i 303.2, ;Floor insulation installed per ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. 402.2.6 :manufacturer's instructions,and in ❑Does Not Comply: [IN2]' :substantial contact with the underside ❑Not Observable ' of the subfloor. ❑Not Applicable 402.1.1, Ma ll insulation R-value.If this is a R- ; R- ;❑Complies ;See the Envelope Assemblies table for 402.2.4. :mass wall with at least''/.of the wall ❑ Wood ❑ Wood :❑Does Not Comply:values. 402.2.5 ;insulation on the wall exterior,the ❑ Mass ❑ Mass QNot Observable ; [IN3]1 exterior insulation requirement ❑ Steel ❑ Steel ;❑Not Applicable r :applies. 303.2 ;Wall insulation is installed per ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [IN4]' manufacturer's instructions. ❑Does Not Comply ❑Not Observable ; IE]Not Applicable 402.2.11 ;Sunroom wall insulation has a R- R- ;❑Complies ;Exception:Requirement is not [IN8]' :minimum R-value of R-13.New walls QDoes Not Comply:applicable. (a I:separating the sunroom from ;❑Not Observable ; :conditioned space must meet code :❑Not Applicable :requirements. 303.2 :Sunroom wall insulation installed per ❑Complies ;Exception:Requirement is not [IN9]' :manufacturer's Instructions. ❑Does Not Comply:applicable. ® ❑Not Observable ; ❑Not Applicable 402.2.11 Sunroom ceiling minimum insulation R- R- :❑Complies ;Exception:Requirement is not [IN10]' :R-value of R-19 in Climate Zones 1-4, :❑Does Not Comply:applicable. ;and R-24 in Climate Zones 5 8. :❑Not Observable : ❑Not Applicable 303.2 ;Sunroom ceiling insulation is installed ❑Complies ;Exception:Requirement is not [IN11]' :per manufacturer's instructions. ❑Does Not Comply:applicable. ❑Not Observable []Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 11 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Report date: 09/18/13 Data filename: C:\Documents and Settings\usd04038\My Documents\REScheck\BurningTree.rck Page 6 of 8 r 2009 IECC Final Inspection Provisions Plans Verified Field Verified Complies? Comments/Assumptions Value Value 402.1.1, ;,Ceiling insulation R-value.Where>R-; R- R- ;❑Complies ;See the Envelope Assemblies table for 402.2.1, :30 is required,R-30 can be used if Wood ;❑ Wood :❑Does Not Comply:values. 402.2.2 ;insulation is not compressed at eaves.; Steel Steel '❑Not Observable [Fl1]' :R-30 may be used for 500 ft'or 20% ;❑Not Applicable j :(whichever is less)where sufficient :space is not available. 303.1.1.1, ;Ceiling insulation installed per ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. 303.2 :manufacturer's instructions.Blown ❑Does Not Comply; [FI2]' :insulation marked every 300 ftz. ❑Not Observable : []Not Applicable 402.2.3 ;Attic access hatch and door insulation ; R- R- ;❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [FI3]1 :R-value of the adjacent assembly. : :❑Does Not Comply ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.4.2, ;Building envelope tightness verified ACH 50= ACH 50= ;❑Complies ;,Requirement will be met. 402.4.2.1 :by blower door test result of<7 ACH : :❑Does Not Comply [FI17]' ;at 50 Pa.This requirement may :❑Not Observable ® ;instead be met via visual inspection, :❑Not Applicable :in which case verification may need to :occur during Insulation Inspection. 402.4.3 Wood-burning fireplaces have ❑Complies :Exception:Requirement is not [FI8]2 gasketed doors and outdoor ❑Does Not Comply:applicable. combustion air. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.2.2 :Post construction duct tightness test : cfm cfm :❑Complies :Requirement will be met. [F14]' :result of 8 cfm to outdoors,or 12 cfm : UDoes Not Comply :across systems.Or,rough-in test ; :❑Not Observable result of 6 cfm across systems or 4 : :❑Not Applicable :cfm without air handler.Rough-in test : :verification may need to occur during ,:Framing Inspection. 403.1.1 Programmable thermostats installed ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [FI9]2 on forced air furnaces. ❑Does Not Comply U ❑Not Observable : ❑Not Applicable 403.1.2 Heat pump thermostat installed on ❑Complies ;,Exception:Requirement is not [FI10]2 heat pumps. ❑Does Not Comply:applicable. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.4 Circulating service hot water systems ❑Complies :Exception:Requirement is not [FI11]2 have automatic or accessible manual ❑Does Not Comply applicable. controls. ❑Not Observable : []Not Applicable 403.9.1 Readily accessible switch on heaters ❑Complies ;,Exception:Requirement is not [FI12]3 for swimming pools. ❑Does Not Comply:applicable. 41 ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.9.2 Timer switches on pool heaters and ❑Complies ;Exception:Requirement is not [F119]3 pumps are present. [)Does Not Comply:applicable. U ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.9.3 Heated swimming pools have a cover. ❑Complies ;Exception:Requirement is not [F120]3 Covers on pools heated over 90 OF ❑Does Not Comply:applicable. are insulated to R-12. ❑Not Observable : [-]Not Applicable 404.1 ;50%of lamps in permanent fixtures ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [FI6]' !are high efficacy lamps. ❑Does Not Comply ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 11 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Report date: 09/18/13 Data filename: CADocuments and Settings\usd04O38\My Documents\REScheck\BurningTree.rck Page 7 of 8 r Plans Verified Field Verified 2009 IECC Final Inspection Provisions Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions 401.3 Compliance certificate posted. ❑Complies :Requirement will be met. [FI7]2 ❑Does Not Comply �p []Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 303.3 Manufacturer manuals for mechanical ❑Complies ;Requirement will be met. [FI18]3 and water heating equipment have ❑Does Not Comply been provided. ❑Not Observable 1E]Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Report date: 09/18/13 Data filename: C:\Documents and Settings\usd04038\My Documents\REScheck\BurningTree.rck Page 8 of 8 r 2009 IECC Energy Efficiency Certificate Insulation . Wall 21.00 Floor 21.00 Ceiling/Roof 41.00 Ductwork(unconditioned spaces): Door Rating U-Factor SHGC Window 0.33 Door 0.32 CoolingHeating& Heating System: Cooling System: Water Heater: Name: Date: Comments: I PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: L� PERMIT# 72 O 1 3 PERMIT DATE: ') a . l M/P: 1 '3La, OZS� LARGE ROLLED PLANS ARE IN: BOX. l Z, SLOT . Data entered in MAPS program on: 't Zz 3 BY: R38 - � �002 I CREScheck Software Version 4.4.4 �J( Compliance Certificate Project Title: Energy Code: 2009 IECC Location: s a le,Massachusetts Construction Type: Single Family Project Type: New Construction Conditioned Floor Area: 3,450 ft2 Glazing Area Percentage: 12% 2� L q1� Heating Degree Days: 6137 Climate Zone: 5 Permit Date: 7 Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contract r: Q.�� 22 Burning Tree Lane Bruce Waluck Anne Michniewicz West Barnstable,MA PO Box 273 Sandwich,MA Harvard,MA 01451 L c t 3 978-807-6017 brucewaluck@yahoo.com ;t Compliance: 1.4%Better Than Code Maximum ILIA: 557 Your UA:549 The%Better or Worse Than Code Index reflects how dose to compliance the house is based on code trade-off rules. It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum-code home. Envelope Assemblies Gross GlazingAssembly Area or Cavity Cont. or Door UA Ceiling 1:Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 1,500 30.0 30.0 26 Ceiling 1 copy 1:Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 1,000 30.0 0.0 35 Wall 1:Wood Frame,16"o.c. 4,175 21.0 0.0 207 Window 1:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 327 0.330 108 SHGC:0.00 Window 2:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 76 0.320 24 SHGC:0.00 Window 3:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 39 0.310 12 SHGC:0.00 Window 4:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 14 0.190 3 SHGC:0.00 Door 1:Solid 28 0.140 4 Door 2:Glass 21 0.340 7 SHGC:0.00 Door 3:Glass 42 0.320 13 SHGC:0.00 Floor 1:All-Wood Joist/Truss:Over Unconditioned Space 2,500 21.0 0.0 110 Project Title: Report date: 12/15/14 Data filename: C:\Users\usd04O38\Documents\REScheck\BurningTreeNEW.rck Page 1 of 2 i Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans,specifications,and other calculations submitted with the permit application.The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2009 IECC requirements in REScheck Version 4.4.4 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. Name-Title Signature Date I Project Title: Report 12/15/14 Data filename: C:\Users\usd04O38\Documents\REScheck\BurningTreeNEW.rck Page 2 of 2 Design of Beam 1: BEAM #1 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.03 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.01501 I Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 13' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 128' -0" Actual 128' -1.25" Brg. 2.5" 0" Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 28' -1.25" MEMBER SELECTED Steel WF W12x35 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In ^2) I ( K /In A2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 8.192 I -15.09 I 2.184 I -0.653 I -0.979 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 63 I 15 I 69 I 87 LOCATION I 0" I 14' -0" I 0" I 14' -0" I 14' -0" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------- - I 12. 5 In. Deep i ------------------------------------------------- ----------- I 8192 lbs Max. 8192 lbs Max. 2732 lbs DL 2732 lbs DL 5460 lbs LL 5 0 lbs LL 8.2 K K General Notes 11. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. " FMgss 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end of the structure. � wB�sH o. N In 3. Locations of- maximum moment, stress and deflection are STRUCTURAL Cn measured from the left end of the structure. NO.29488 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. 1 5. Structural adequacy of supporting �O members must be confirmed. SNAL E < 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on A supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. i Design -of Beam 1': BEAM #2 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.98 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.5 I Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I Side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 112' -0" Actual 112' -1.25" Brg. 2.5" 0" Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 12' -1.25" MEMBER SELECTED Steel WF w8x18 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In ^2) 1 ( K /In ^2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 8.88 I -21.03 I 4.743 I -0.255 1 -0.385 OF ALLOW I n/a I 88 I 32 I 63 I 80 LOCATION I 0" I 6' -0" I 0" I 6' -0" I 6' -0" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K .(RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 8.14 In. i Deep ------------------------------------------------------------ 8880 lbs Max. 8880 lbs Max. 3000 lbs DL 3000 lbs DL 5880 lbs LL 5880 lbs LL 8.9 K 8.9 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end y ,c , sErrs of the structure. o d 3. Locations of, maximum moment, stress and deflection are measured from the left end of the structure. w ����CV' 1w 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. �� �� �`� 5. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on °° PROF supporting members. Q� 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. Cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. Design of Beam '1: BEAM #3 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.98 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.5 I species wet Use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade Rep. Use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I Side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) SPAN 1 Length 116' -0" Actual 116' -1.25" Brg. 2. 5 0" Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 16' -1.25" MEMBER SELECTED Steel wF W10x26 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In A2) I ( K /In ^2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 11.84 I -20.37 I 4.408 I -0.346 I -0. 523 OF ALLOW I n/a I 85 I 30 I 64 I 81 LOCATION I 0" I 8' -0" I 0" I 8' -0" I 8' -0" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 10.33 In. Deep -- - ------------------------------------------------------- 1.184e+004 lbs Max. 1.184e+004 lbs Max. 4000 lbs DL 4000 lbs DL 7840 lbs LL 7840 lbs LL 12 K 12 K General Notes P FMgSSyc 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. yes 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end `"' " °' of the structure. BLS P N STRUCT RAl 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are NO.29488 measured from the left end of the structure. APO RFGiSTER�°.���2 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. FSSIONM- - 5. structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. Design,of Beam 1: BEAM #4 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.03 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.01501 I Species Wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade : 2.0E Rep. Use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 14' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I Side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 112' -0" Actual 112' -1.25" Brg. 2.5" 0" Min. 1.5" 1.5" Total Length : 12' -1.25" MEMBER SELECTED Generic LVL 2.0E 1.75x9. 5x3 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In A2) I ( K /In ^2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 3.781 I 1.724 I 0.098706 I -0.261 I -0.392 , OF ALLOW I n/a I 57 I 34 I 65 I 81 LOCATION I 0" I 6' -0" I 11' -2. 5" I 6' -0" I 6' -0" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 3.781 K (LEFT) 3.781 K (RIGHT) ------------------- In. Deep i i ------------------------------------------------------------ I I 3781 lbs Max. 3781 lbs Max. 1261 lbs DL 1261 lbs DL 2520 lbs LL 2520 lbs LL 3.8 K 3.8 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. MASS 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end of the structure. o. 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are o g1$H P U) measured from the left end of the structure. STRUCTURAL � 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. N0.29488 5. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. A�O� RFGISTER�O\�� 6. Bearing 1 engths required may be 1 i mi ted by bearing stress onny�,SONA��� supporting members. pp 9 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. Cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. I ----------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Design �of Beam 1': BEAM #4A INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.075 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.07501 I Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade : 2.0E Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/360 I Trib. Width : 1' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/480 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I Side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 16' -0" Actual 16' -1.25" Brg. 2. 5" 0" Min. 1.5" 1.5" Total Length : 6' -1.25" ADDITIONAL LOADS (Distances are from left end) Units: K Ft REF I LOAD I LOAD I DISTANCE I LOAD I . BEGIN I END NO. I CASE I TYPE I TO START I LENGTH I VALUE I VALUE 1 I D I C 1 3 I 1 1.50 '1 2I L I C I3 I I 2.501 MEMBER SELECTED Generic LVL 2.0E 1.75x7.25x2 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL 1 ( K ) IC K /In A2) I ( K /In A2) 1 C In) ( C In) MAX VALUE I 2.45 I 2.612 I 0.13947 I -0.097 I -0.160 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 83 I 48 I 64 I 79 LOCATION I 0" I 3' -0" I 5' -4.75" I 3' -0" I 3' -0" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 2.45 K (LEFT) 2.45 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 1 7.25 In. Deep ------------------------------------------------------------ 2450 lbs Max. 2450 lbs Max. 975 lbs DL 975 lbs DL 1475 lbs LL 1475 lbs LL 2.5 K 2. 5 K General Notes SETTS 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. P 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end 0 of the structure. Q 2 o - 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are W m "gyp W measured from the left end of the structure. 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. 5. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. PRO 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must" be fastened to the support to resist uplift. R r'anti 1 avar tlafl anti nn al 1 nimnhl ac ara hacarl nn twi ra tha cnan 1 annth f Design,of Beam 1': BEAM #5 INPUT Floor I Live .Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.6 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.3 I species wet Use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade 2.0E Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL 100 Rt. cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes ( Side Loaded NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 115' -0" Actual 115' -1.25" Brg. 2. 5" 0" Min. 1.714" 1.714" Total Length : 15' -1.25" MEMBER SELECTED Generic LVL 2.0E 1.75x14x3 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL ( K ) I ( K /In A2) I ( K /In A2) I ( In) I ( In) MAX VALUE I 6.75 I 1.771 I 0.11633 I -0.285 I -0.427 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 61 I 40 I 56 I 71 LOCATION I 0" I 7' -6" I 13' -10" I 7' -6" I 7' -61 1 MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 6.75 K (LEFT) 6.75 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 14 In. I Deep ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 6750 lbs Max. 6750 lbs Max. 2250 lbs DL 2250 lbs DL 4500 lbs LL 4500 lbs LL 6.8 K 6.8 K General Notes. 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end. MASSgcy of the structure. 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are WILLIA 0• �-A measured from the left end of the structure. o BISHOP N 4. Beari ng across ful 1 wi dth of beam i s requi red. sNO 294gg`" S. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. 6. Bearing lengths required may be 1 i mi ted by bearing stress on 0, FGISTS supporting members. FSSIONA\- 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened V to the support to resist uplift. 8. Cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. ---------------=------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Desi gn�of Beam'1: BrAM #6 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.03 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.01501 I Species wet Use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 I Grade : 2.0E Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 13' -0" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 115' -6" Actual 115' -7.25" Brg. 2. 5" 0" Min. 1.5" 1.5" Total Length : 15' -7.25" MEMBER SELECTED Generic LVL 2.0E 1.75x11.875x3 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL C K ) IC K /In ^2) IC K /In ^2) I C In) I C In) MAX VALUE I 4.535 I 1.709 I 0.095175 I -0.346 I -0.519 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 58 I 33 I 66 I 83 LOCATION I 15' -6" I 7' -9" 114' -6.125" I 7' -9" I 7' -9" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 4.535 K (LEFT) 4.535 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 11.88 In. Deep ------------------------------------------------------------ 4535 lbs Max. 4535 lbs Max. 1512 lbs DL 1512 lbs DL 3022 lbs LL 3022 lbs LL 4.5 K .5 K General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end E ` yo, of the structure. �9 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are measured from the left end of the structure. o do Gar�A 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. �99aRgc 5. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. /o ';F, en 6. Bearing 1 engths required may be 1 i mi ted by bearing stress on '�ENGINEER supporting members. �3 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. 8. cantilever deflection allowables are based on twice the span length. Design. of Beam 1: BEAM #7 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.03 I Slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.01501 I Species . wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0 i Grade Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1' -4" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection L/360 I DOL : 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading Yes I side Loaded : No SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 113' -0" Actual 113' -1.25" Brg. 2.5 0" Min. 0" 0" Total Length : 13' -1.25" ADDITIONAL LOADS (Distances are from left end) units: K Ft REF I LOAD I LOAD I DISTANCE I LOAD I BEGIN I END NO. I CASE I TYPE I TO START I LENGTH I VALUE I VALUE 1 I D I C 16 I I 1. 50 2 I L I C 16 I I 3.00 MEMBER SELECTED Steel wF w8x13 . IS MEMBER OK? Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL C K ) IC K /In ^2) IC K /In ^2) I C In) I C In) MAX VALUE I 2.813 I -19.13 I 1.531 I -0..227 I -0.341 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 80 I 10 I 52 I 65 LOCATION I 0" I 6' -0" I 0" I 6' -4.26" I 6' -4.26" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 0 K (LEFT) 0 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 7.99 In. Deep ------------------------------------------------------------ { 2813 lbs Max. 2461 lbs Max. 937.8 lbs DL .4 lbs DL 1875 lbs LL 45 lbs LL 2.8 K K WEA(Ty OKI General Notes 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end A y C tiro c of the structure. ,� °�9e��� m 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection are C. measured from the left end of the structure. °tisTFRED 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. FNCINEE� 5. st' uctural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. 6. Bearing lengths required may limited by bearing stress on supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. $Z • rnntilavar rlaflartinn nllnimnklac arc hacati nn twira tha cnan lannth I . Design, of Beam 1: BEAM #7 INPUT Floor I Live Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0.03 I slope 0 in 12 Code : UBC I Dead Load ( K /Ft A2) : 0,01501 I Species wet use : No I Snow Load ( K /Ft A2) . : 0 I Grade : 2.0E Rep. use : No I TL Deflection : L/300 I Trib. width : 1' -4" Lt. Cant. : N I LL Deflection : L/360 I DOL 100 Rt. Cant. : N I Pattern Loading : Yes I side Loaded : NO SPAN DATA (Length is to center line of bearing) I SPAN 1 Length 113' -0" Actual 113' -1.25" Brg. 2.5" 0" Min. 1.5" 1.5" Total Length : 13' -1.25" ADDITIONAL LOADS (Distances are from left end) units: K Ft REF I LOAD I LOAD I DISTANCE I LOAD I BEGIN I END NO. I CASE I TYPE I TO START I LENGTH i VALUE I VALUE 11 D I C 16 I I 1. 50I 21 L I C 16 I I 3.00I MEMBER SELECTED Generic LVL 2.0E 1.75x11.875x2 IS MEMBER OK? : Yes CRITICAL STRESSES SUMMARY CONTROL I REACTION I BENDING I SHEAR I LL-DEFL I TL-DEFL C K ) IC K /In ^2) IC K /In ^2) I C In) I C In) MAX VALUE I 2.813 I 2.305 I 0.099159 I -0.267 I -0.401 % OF ALLOW I n/a I 78 I 34 I 61 I 77 LOCATION I 0" I 6' -0" I 12' -.125" i 6' -4.26" I 6' -4.26" MAXIMUM HANGER FORCES 2.813 K (LEFT) 2.467 K (RIGHT) ------------------------------------------------------------ 11.88 In. j Deep I ------------------------------------------------------------ 2813 lbs Max. 2467 lbs Max. 937.8 lbs DL 822.4 lbs DL 1875 lbs LL 1645 lbs LL 2.8 K oN EA( o� 2. 5 K • G � General Notes ��a4q� 9N(P 1. Beam weight is assumed to be included in Dead Load. o tioZICIA o 2. Load locations given are measured from the left end „ p ? G m me 9 B Q of the structure. �- 's gip y� 3. Locations of maximum moment, stress and deflection a 02q(�NGD EER measured from the left end of the structure. 4. Bearing across full width of beam is required. S. Structural adequacy of supporting members must be confirmed. 6. Bearing lengths required may be limited by bearing stress on supporting members. 7. A negative reaction indicates that the beam must be fastened to the support to resist uplift. R ranti 1 ava r tiafl Anti nn n11 nvonhl ac n ra hacad nn tiui na tha cnnn 1 annth , .^ ��� ^ 1l^ � 3 ��� � � �� � � ���� /�' I a MASSACHUSETTS QUITCLAIM DEED SNORT FORM(INDIVIDUAL)681 t aoor.2652 FAl 061 otgg0 I, KATHERINE A. GRIMM, of 31 Chestnut Street, Wellesley, Norfolk County,Massachusetts I` being married,for consideration paid,and in full consideration of EIGHTEEN THOUSAND FINE HUNDRED ($18,500.00) DOLLARS grant to AUDREY M. LOUGHNANE of Point Hill Road, Barnstable County, with I[Wltlulm raurnunts Massachusetts, thelandin West Barnstable, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, bounded and described as follows: [Description and encumbrances,if any) BEGINNING: at a point on the Northerly sideline of Burning Tree Lane at the in- tersections of Lots 9 and 10 as sham on a plan hereinafter mentioned; THENCE: North 23° 43' 58" West by Lot 9, a distance of Two Hundred NIneteen and 99/100 (219.99) feet to a paint; THENCE: North 66" 15' 25" East by land now or formerly of Robert W. and Grace L. Russell, sixty-five and 15/100 (65.15) feet to a cement bound found; THENCE: North 66° 16' 02" East by said Russell land Ninety-four and 85/100 (94.85) feet to a point; THENCE: SOUTH 230 43' 58" East by Lot 11, a distance of Two Hundred Twenty and 00/100 (220.00) feet to a point; THENCE: South 66n 16' 02" West by the sideline of Burning Tree Lane, a distance of One Hundred Sixty and 00/100 (160.00) feet to the original point of beginning. Being shown as LOT 10 containing an area of 35,200 square feet, more or less, on a plan--in-titled "Subdivision Plan of Land in West Barnstable, Mass. and East Sandwich, Mass. designed for Point Hill Realty Trust, Pe- titioners by Crowell 6 Taylor Corp. Yarmouthport Mass. Scale: 1" = 100' , July, 1971," said plan being duly recorded in Barnstable County Registry cE Deeds in Plan Book 249, Page 107. Together with a right of way in and over the ways as shown on said plan together with all others entitled thereto. Said premises are conveyed subject to the restrictions as set forth in a deed front Robert W. Bridges to Katherine A. Grimn and Richard W. Grimm, Jr., recorded in Barnstable County Registry of Deeds Book 1684, Page 245. Subjec t to and with the benefit of all rights, restrictions, resery ations, easements and other encumbrances of record insofar as the same are now of force and effect. For my title, see Deed of Richard W. Grimm, Jr., et ux , to me dated October 28, 1977, and recorded in said Deeds in Book 2608, Page 149. 39ltnrsa••AW...;.-nand and seal this....f.r.:.�`.� y �fZGi:A,r l�'L... 193.7... ..�././....day of:::. .. UMrA JH OF /AASSAt11UScf1S �f.•.�e�A.....Ith ............... !. a.. ,�, ID Katherine A. Grimm 4 _._�aS ............................................................................... a o I— _ Ice —.Lig73'7R I'V ==" 4L. I SF•= .`-. .--. s .......................................................... .. Wilt womulanwealtil nl ands"4110r1ts co4ary v . Then personally appeared the above named KATHERINE A. GRIMM OV % and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be her free act and deed, before mf Notary l I'u u% •• Iv Mr,•.,:,�.:. RITA A. ROGERS M9 nmrtussiou explres NOTARY PUBLIC 19 ...... le oonduW 0*0 lbb V.HU ("individual—Joint Tenants—Tenants in Common--Tenants by the Entirety.) CHAPIT.R IR3 SEC.6 AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 497 OF 1969 Every deed presented for record shill contain or have endorsed upon it the full Sarre,residence and put office address of the grantee and a recital of the amount of the full uotuidersti.m thereof in dollars or the nature of the other comideratiem therefor,if not delivered for a icfic monetary sum. The full comidemtion shall mean the total price for the conveyance without deduction for any lien or eno., I- aesumad by the grantee or teruininR thereon. um as thereon. All such endorents and recitals shall be recorded part of the deed. Failure I,,o rnr; with thiv action ahall not afrm the validity of any deed. No register of deeds shall accept a deed for recording unless it is in compliance with the requirements of this section. RECORDED JAN 2 3 1978 BARNSTABLE COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS A TRUE COPY,ATTEST JOHN F.MEADE,REGISTER Lt ie, F , AT-YC-Guide to Wood Constructhr! hi HMI fWcnd Areas:110 ticph 1K17d Zorze Massachusetts Checklist for Compliance (780 CAIR5301:2.1.1)' Check Compliance 1.1 SCOPE WindSpeed(3-sec. gust).................................................................. ................................................ 110 mph WindExposure Category.................................................................. .............................................................B ✓ Wind Exposure Category................Engineering Required For Entire Project.......................................C 12 APPLICABILITY Number of Stories (a roof which exceeds 8 in 12 slope shall be considered a story) 2 sto n'es <2 stories Roof Pitch....................:......................................................(Fig 2) .........................� . Iz i -<12:12 MeanRoof Height............................................................._(Fig 2)....................------...................�Q ft <'33' Building Width,W ...............................................................(Fig 3)...................:................... ft 5 90, BuildingLength, L ..............................................................(Fig 3)............................... ft__<80' Building Aspect Ratio (Fig 4 ............................. .......... <_3:1 t✓ Nominal Height of Tallest Opening2 .............................:.....(Fig 4)................................................Co-YJ 5 6'8' C/ 1.3 FRAMING CONNECTIONS General compliance with framing connections....................(Table 2)............................................................... �C 2.1 FOUNDATION Foundation Walls meeting requirements of 780 CMR 5404.1 ✓ Concrete....... .................................................................................................................... ConcreteMasonry........................._......................................................................................................... 22,ANCHORAGE TO FOUNDATION"' 5/3'Anchor Bolts,imbedded or 5/B'Proprietary Mechanical Anchors as an alternative in concrete only o Bolt Spacing-general ........................................:.(Table 4).................:.............._.....,.._..... 2 a/ Bolt Spacing from endrjoint of plate .............................(Fig 5)..................:.................1 in.-<6'-12 4� Bolt Embedment-concrete.........................................(Fig 5)...... ................................:...........`1 in.17" Bolt Embedment-masonry........................................ (Fig 5).....:......r............................... in-_> 15' Plate Washer-*..............................................................(Fig 5)..............................................>3"x 3-x'/.' 3.1 FLOORS Floor-framing member spans checked ...............................(per 780 CMR Chapter 55)................................... Maximum Floor Opening Dimension.................................. (Fig 6)..................................................(ID$ft_12' Full Height Wall Studs at Floor Openings less than 2'from Exterior Wall(Fig 6)............................ . . Maximum Floor Joist Setbacks L� Supporting Loadbearing Walfs or Shearwall................(Fig 7).................................................... t 5 d Maximum Cantilevered Floor Joists Supporting Loadbearing Walls'or Shearwall................(Fig 8).................................................... Dtt 5 d V FloorBracingat Endwalls....................................................(Fig 9).............._................_................................. Floor Sheathing Type ........................................................(per 780 CMR Chapter 55)......... C/ Floor Sheathing Thickness ...........................................:.....(per 780 CMR Chapter 55)..................... in. S� Floor Sheathing Fastening..................................................(Table 2).. d nails at_L edge/_' eld 4.1 WALLS Wall Height Loadbearing walls.........................................................(Fig 10 and Table 5)...........................K ft 510' Non-Loadbearing walls ............:...................................(Fig 10 and Table 5)...........................1, ft'S 20 Wall Stud Spacing .........................................................(Fig 10 and Table 5)..................U.0-in.5 24'o.c. / WallStory Offsets .....................................................:..(Figs 7&8)............................................. O ft 5 d v 4.2 EXTERIOR•WALLS3 Wood Studs Loadbearing"Is........................................................(Table 5)..........................._.2x Non-Loadbearing walls (T ) _ .................:.............................: able 5 ..............................2x -�ft in. Gable End Wall Bracing Full Height Endwall Studs......................... .......(Fig 10)......................,........................................ WSP-Attic Floor Length.................:...................._.......:(Fig 11)_....... ................._........._...... ft W/3 'G sum Ceiling Length rf WSP not used (Fig 11 ft z 0.9W Z and 2 x 4 Continuous Lateral Brace @ 6 ft o.c. .. (Fig 11)............................................................. or 1 x 3 ceiling furring strips @ 16'spacing min.with 2 x 4 blocking @ 4 ft.spacing in end joist or truss bays Double Top Plate AM,C Guide to Wood Construction! in High fYind flreas: 110 tfrph f "Irid Zone Massachusetts Checklist_ for Compfiance (7s0 Cik1R5301.2.1.1�r Loadbearing Wall Connections ' Lateral (no.of 16d common nails)................................(Tables 7)..................................................... `L Nan-Loadbearing Wall Connections - / Lateral (no.of 16d common nails)................................(Table 8)....................................................... 5� Load Bearing Wall Openings (record largest opening but check all openings for compliance to Table 9) _ / HeaderSpans ........................................................(Table 9)............................--.... ft 0 in.5 11' Sill Plate Spans ........................................................(Table 9).....-........................... ft din.5 11' Full Height Studs (no. of studs)....................................(Table 9)....................................................... Non-Load Bearing Wall Openings (record largest opening but check all openings for compliance to Table 9) HeaderSpans.............................................................(Table 9)...................------........._ft_in.5,1Z SillPlate Spans......................:....................................(Table 9).................................. ft_in.5 12' Full Height Studs (no. of studs)....................................(Table 9)......................................................... sJ / Exterior Wall Sheathing to Resist Uplift and Shear Simultaneously Minimum Building Dimension, W Yb Z AF.Nominal Height of Tallest Opening Sheathing Type........ ..................•......(note 4)...................................................... p� (/ Edge Nail Spacing.•.............................I.........(fable 10 or note 4 if less)......................:. in. Field Nail Spacing............................:.............(fable 1D)......_..._......................_............... Shear Connection (no. of 16d common nails)(Table 10).......:.....:.......... .... �{........... . .. Percent Full--Height Sheathing :... able 10 ...............__.....3�� ��.lf? °!° v 9 9 (T ). . 5%Additional Sheathing for Wall.with Opening>6'8"(Design cepts)..... ............. Maximum Building Dimension, L -7 Nominal Height of Tallest O enin Z ....................................... SheathingType..............................................(note 4).....................................................G�K Edge Nail Spacing able 11 or note 4 if less ......:................. m. -Field Nail Spacing g..................... (Table 11)................,..........---...................-12.�n. Fi acin Shear Connection(no. of 16d common nails)(Table 11)............................. ��..... ° Percent Full-Height Sheathing.......................(Table 11)......................... 2. _....... /° 5%Additional Sheathing for Wall with Opening>6'8".(Design Cbncep .................... Wall Cladding Ratedfor Wind Speed?.............................................................. ........................................................E.� 5.1 ROOFS Roof framing member spans checked?.........................(For Rafters use AWC Sien Tool,see BBRS Website) Roof Overhang .:..................................................(Figure 19) ............. ff ft 5 smaller of 2'-or L/3 Truss or Rafter Connections at Loadbearing Walls Proprietary Connectors Uplift....•...........................................(Table 12)............................................U=`Z J If Lateral.............................................(Table 12).............................................L= plf ✓ Shear............................:..................(Table 12)............................................S plf Ridge Strap Connections, if collar ties not used per page 21... (Table 13)...............................T= . plf Gable Rake Oudooker.._........................................(Figure 20) ............. ft 5 smaller of 2'or U2 ' Truss or Rafter Connections at Non-Loadbearing Walls Proprietary Connector's Uplift................................................(Table 14)............................................U= lb. Lateral no. of 16d common nails)... able 14 L= . lb. Roof Sheathing Type................:..................................(per 780 CMR Chapters 58 anqf 59) ....... .eco-, c� Roof Sheathing Thickness.....................................:.....:........................................... r ->7/16"WS / Roof Sheathing Fastening............................................(Table 2)....................._.............................il..� CA Notes: ;D a6bi_ (o F,lam. .1. . This checklist shall be met in its entirety, excluding the specific exception noted in 2, to comply with the requirements of 780 CMR-5301.2.1.1 Item 1. If the checklist is met in its entirety then the fol)ow)ng metal straps and hold downs ara not required per the WFCM 110 mph Guide: a. Steel Straps per Figure 5 b. 20.Gage Straps per Figure 11 c. Uplift Straps per Figure 14. d. All Straps per Figure 17 e. Comer Stud Hold Downs per Figure 18a and Figure 18b 2. 'Exception:Opening heights of up to B ft.shall be permitted when 5% is added to the percent full-height sheathing requirements shown in Tables 10 and 11. 3. The bottom sill plate in exterior walls shall be a minimum 2 in. nominal thickness pressure treated#2-gr2ide. . � e c^�o � S ��Z� _��C,� v� G®'� x. �— ,— .; _. _.� - - • V A FYC'Gidde to Wood Construction in High Wind Areas:110 tnph I'vind Zone Massachusetts Checklist for Compliance (7a0 CnTR5301:2.1.1)' Check - Compbance 1.1 SCOPE 910 mph P ( gust) .....::......_. ._..... ............................................. Wind Speed 3-s�c. ust ............................... ...... ... p WindExposure Category ..........................................................................................................................B ! � Wind Exposure Category................Engineering Required For Entire Project.......................................0 12 APPLICABILITY Number of Stories (a roof which exceeds 8 in 12 slope shall be considered a story) Z stori 2 stories Roof Pitch..............................:............................................(Fig 2) ..............:........._. _i? 512:12 ✓ MeanRoof Height ..._(Fig 2 ....................................................................................... Building Width,W ...........................................................!..(Fig 3).............S 4.._......... s 90' i . Building Length, L ..............................................................(Fig 3)...._........:z ...�. 2 --.. BO' y Building Aspect Ratio (Fig 4 5 3:1 Nominal Height of Tallest Opening .............................:.....(Fig 4)................................................� <6'B• C� 1.3 FRAMING CONNECTIONS c General compliance with framing connections....................(Table 2)............................................................... 2.1 FOUNDATION Foundation Walls meeting requirements of 780 CMR 5404.1 Concrete...................................................:.......................................................................... ConcreteMasonry........................._.......................................................................................:................ 2-2 ANCHORAGE TO FOUNDATION1'3 5/8'Anchor Bolts=imbedded or 5/13'Proprietary Mechanical Anchors as an altemativ4tiwncrete only Bolt Spa P_ cing—general ..........................................(Table 4)......................... in. Bolt S crri from end(oint of late Pa � 9 J P .............................(Fig 5).................................... Bolt Embedment—concrete.........................................(Fig 5)...... ................................:............ in.>7" . C/ Bolt Embedment—masonry........................................ (Fig 5).....:......_............................... in.>_ 15" _ PlateWasher..:.............................................................(Fig 5)..............................................>3-x 3-x 3.1 FLOORS / Floor-framing member-spans checked ..............................(per 780 CMR Chapter 55)........._..............._......... V Maximum Floor Opening Dimension................. ..............(Fig 6).................................----• .........� 7ft s 12' Full Height Wall Studs at Floor Openings less than 2'from Exterior Wall(Fig 6)....................................... � Maximtim Floor.Joist Setbacks Suppoijing Loadbearing Walrs or Shearwall................(Fig 7)......................................................... _<d j Maximum Cantilevered Floor Joists Supporting Loadbearin Walls*or Shearwall................(Fig 8 ft d FloorBracingat Endwalls........................................ (Fig 9).............._.................................................. Floor Sheathing Type ........................................................(per 780 CMR Chapter 55)......•--•••---...•-:.•--• .....n Floor Sheathing Thickness .................................................(per 780 C Chapter 55)..... ................ in. Floor Sheathing Fastening..............................................:...(Table 2)..b d nails at�in edge/fin field 4.1 WALLS Wall Height Loadbearing walls.........................................................(Fig 10 and Table 5)........................: ft 10, Non-Loadbearing walls (Fig 10 and Table 5) ft's 20' tl Wall Stud Spacing ..........................:.............................(Fig 10 and Table 5)................... in.�4'o.c. C Wall Story Offsets ......................................................!..(Figs 7&8)......................... ft <d 4.2 EXTERIOR•WALLS' Wood Studs Loadbearingwalls ...... ............................................ able 2x g ft in. (T )............................. - Non-Loadbearing walls._._..........................................:(Table 5)..............................2x�- 4_in. Gable End Wall Bracing Full Hei 'ht Endwall Studs....................................._.....(Fig 10 ...............:.:...__. WSP•Attic Floor Length..._...._.......:.... (Fig 11)_........................................... ft_:W/3 'Gypsum Ceiling Length(if WSP not used)....:..............(Fig 11).............................................. ft>_0.9W and 2 x 4 Continuous Lateral Brace @ 6 ft o.c...(Fig 11)............................................................. or 1 x 3 ceiling furring strips @ IT spacing min.with 2 x 4 blocking @ 4 f L spacing in end joist or truss bays Double Top Plate AA'C Guide to Wood Construction in High Wirrd Areas:'119l mph-lf'ind Zone Massachusetts Checklist for Compliance (780 CMR5301.2.1.1)' Loadbearing Wall Connections Lateral (no.of 16d common nails).......................:........(fables 7)...................................................... Non-Loadbearing Wall Connections Lateral (no.of 16d common nails)................................(Table 8)....................................................... 2 Load Bearing Wall Openings (record largest opening but check all openings for cony ptiance to Table 9) Header Spans ........................................................(Table 9)................................... aJ ft—in.5 1 V :✓ Sill Plate Spans ........................................................(Table 9)....._........................... ft_in. 11 1� Full Height Studs (no. of-stu . ds)...................................(Table 9)....................._...............,........ _..._ & Non-Load Bearing Wall Openings (record largest opening but check all openings for complfce in to Table 9) .. Header Spans.............................................................(Table 9)................. .------ . •...... _ ft .5 12' Sill Plate Spans......................:....................................(Table 9)................._............... _in.5 12- Full Height Studs(no. of studs)....................................(Table 9)..................................._._......__........'_r Exterior Wall Sheathing to Resist Uplift and Shear Simultaneously4 Minimum Building Dimension, W s Nominal Height of Tallest OpeningZ ...................... ................................................CI 5 6`8 C,- SheathingType..............................................(note 4)...................................................... M c� Edge Nail Spacing.........................................(Table 10 or note 4 if less)......................... to in. C� Feld Nail Spacing . p g...........................:..............(Table 10).................................... Shear Connection (no. of 16d common nails)(Table 10)...:.................................: ..._ a/ Percent Full-Height Sheathing...................:...(Table 10)..........................:7.. .... / e/ 5%Additional Sheathing for Wall.with Opening>6'8'(Design Concepts).................... Maximum Building Dimension, L 2-F Cam, Nominal Height of Tallest Opening 2...................... ..:....:.............................. ........01�X 6'8' Sheathing Type..............................................(note 4)........................................... -- Edge Nail Spacing.........................................(fable 11 or note 4 if less)........................ CP in. Feld Nail Spacing......................................:..(fable 11)................I......................l?... f L Shear Connection no, of 16d common nails able 11 ,��•�j/ - Percent Full-Height Sheathing..;.....................(Table 11).............................ii.Z.L`lt!. _.5% 5%Additional Sheathing for Wail with'Opening>6'8'.(Design Concepts):................:.. -� Wall Cladding i Rated for Wind Speed?..................... 5.1 ROOFS Roof framing member spans checked?...........:............ For Rafters use AWC S gh Toot,see BBRS Website Fi - Roof Overhang ...................................................(Figure 19 _ft 5 smaller of 2'-or L/3 Truss or Rafter Connections at Loadbearing Walls Proprietary Connectors Uplift........................................,....:..(Table 12)............................................U-�plf Lam/ Lateral...:.........................................(1-able 12)..............................................L=1�&pff Shear..............................................(Table 12)............................................S=_�fj pif Ridge Strap Connections, if collar be not used per page 21... (Table 13)..........v...................T= pff Gable Rake Oudooker.................................. (Figure 20 ... 8ft 5 smaller of 2'or L/2 Truss or Rafter Connections at Non-Loadbearing Walls Proprietary Connectors Uplift.......................:. (Table 14)............................................U=1-7(Ib. Lateral(no.of 16d common nails)...(fable 14)................ . = Roof Sheathing Type...................................................(per 780 CMR Chapters 58 and 59)......... ✓ Roof Sheathing Thickness.....................................:.................................................. in.>7/16'WSf� ✓j Roof Sheathing Fastening.............................................(Table 2).....................:........................... Notes: -1. . This checklist shall be met in its entirety, excluding the specific exception noted in 2, to comply with the requirements of 780 CMR-5301.2.1.1 Item 1. If the checklist is met in its entirety then the following metal straps and hold downs are not required per the WFCM 110 mph Guide: a. Steel Straps per Figure 5 b. 2b Gage Straps per Figure 11 c. Uplift Straps per Figure 14. d. All Straps per Figure 17 ' e. Comex Stud Hold Downs per Figure 18a and Figure 18b 2. 'Exceptiorr Opening heights of up to 8 ft:shall be permitted when 5% is added to the percent full-height sheathing requirements shown in Tables 10 and 11. 3. The bottom sill plate in exterior walls shall be a minimum 2 in.nominal thickness pressure treated#2-grade. 2013 �6 �3 `( i �e�� � �O C w� Thou. � -� 1,0 �. �rr1� S �ppnvu� °4INE r° Town of Barnstable BARNSTABLE Regulatory Services � MASS g ,d w Building Division 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 1 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 t Inspection Correction Notice i i Type of Inspection 131-IAJ Location 2 Z ali��'�°`� J� �Au Permit Number Za 13 06 S�3 , X. Owner k1,9 4itck- Builder S-A9/n E i One notice to remain on job site,one notice on file in Building Department. The following items need correcting: p W AJ S, c. S ©,u A o a Tiir L�lfl S t o oP 1 osT ��z(sr' (�'�/z T/� �cW. >E ,C1 y ��E� I qiy�-oL,• y rRc ��dTiLt�rl/� �6/✓ QFg. -" x t. Please call: 508-862-46" for re-inspection. Inspected by� c�',�-� Date � LlS5- i IKE Town of Barnstable •BARNSTABLE. Regulatory Services • .. MASS. h.- Building Division f0 MPS 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-8624038 `S Fax: 508-790-6230 Inspection Correction Notice Type of Inspection 13 1-1,AJ Location Z 13li�tii I A� Permit Number 2013 06S3 . Owner k119 cuclk Builder One notice to remain on job site,one notice on file in Building Department. The following items need correcting: ,( / 2 /QE �g1AJ�,(JG �O(J�Js,�o S Du I�(, 0l2r�/LC�r�Sr lO•('1�� �.,... A4 Gf S 7` IfA41AM 7-;L— /N -7� 1,b/Z yGc c C L u9 POST ?(st/ OE—lzT/,E �CJ?TE -3 f o s-r 4 cc 6 E u (ic-13-c�s 0/Q O rRr � s(-N Dom. 1 �s PSG77 0AJ &)e iAJ ��1/A-) Pf G?L'(/ff E--e) Sr/9L 'y�EN l�l 65 �ti �-,�1��� �TiQOGFG 33 Please call: 508-862-40" for re-inspection. Inspected by� ` Date �/O Llam BIKE Town of Barnstable i RNSTARLE. Regulatory Services RA MASS 9. •Building Division p�EO MPS� 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 Inspection Correction Notice Type of Inspection Location a2 Aole a/09- r,,f G. ,vF aJA Permit Number 1 3 S� Owner Builder One notice to remain on job site,one notice on file in Building Department. The following items need correcting: ter. 9l�/�/7/ �`f /�/•�/i/�Oly U/�L L —" c�TIP!�l"�-S /�a Th' :�iG�-� G��;}��� ���' S. 6�07-o, D/= �(iT�i7c� �c--/klT �C I L iNG 027/iR 9:!06 lql--F Q4 56 a M ,7-o7y?Aq e- A---Av& 7W4 770/()5 1 F �&U In/6- ar Z - f 1,oole Cf4A s6 Ao i 1 ' 1 r r i I Q %L Please call: 508-862- for re-inspection. Inspected by �"' — 5wz� Date r Town of Barnstable uF n+e rqk, Regulatory Services �y�' '► Richard V. Scali,Director i • Building Division BARNSTABLE snxxszAIIM MAS. wu�aa� nuEeurser 039. Paul Roma, Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us August 24, 2016 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Mr. Bruce W. Waluck RE: 22 Burning Tree Lane Mrs. Susan E. Waluck West Barnstable, MA 02668 22 Burning Tree Lane Map: 136 Parcel: 025 West Barnstable, MA 02668 Mr. and Mrs. Waluck, Your Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the subject property expired on December 10, 2015. You are currently in violation of: 1.) The Massachusetts State Building Code 780 CMR R110 Certificate of Occupancy as amended. 2.) The Town of Barnstable General Ordinances Chapter 240-124B Occupancy Permits. All work necessary to satisfy.the requirements for securing a Certificate of Occupancy for the subject property must be completed by September 30, 2016'or you will be subject to all applicable fines. By Order, � �V Robert McKechnie Local Inspector 508-862-4033 robert.rmckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us Town of Barnstable �F1HE, Regulatory Services Richard.V. Scali,Director ,ARNBrABLE. ; Building Division BARNSTABLE MA88. � w s"ia`s°Hwsa�mu�'rcxv�sw 1639. , Thomas Perry, CBO 1639-2014 A'ED rA Building Commissioner 573 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230. April 15, 2016 Mr. Bruce W. Waluck Re: 22 Burning Tree Lane Mrs. Susan E. Waluck West Barnstable, MA 02668 PO Box 273 Harvard, MA 01451-0273 Dear Bruce and Susan, It is spring and the runoff from your property is still flowing onto your neighbor's property. Enough time has passed for you to mitigate and contain the runoff on your property. _You therefore are ordered to come up with an engineered plan and start work on that plan within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Furthermore, you are hereby ordered to satisfactorily complete the work within 60 days of receipt of this letter, If you choose not to act on this order or are unable to meet the deadlines imposed by this order further action will be taken by this office and serious repercussions should be expected. Thank you for your immediate attention, By Order Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department 508-862-4033 Robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us Now r r- v� lL t v l/lJ q7 g r Y t es-detail/309-Bay-Ln_Centerville_MA_02632 M... 4/7/2016 tHEtp�� Town of Barnstable Building Department - 200 Main Street ASTABLE, Hyannis, MA 02601 y MASS. $ (508) 862-4038 ArfD MA'S A Certificate of Occupancy Temporary Application 201306534 CO Number: 20150206 Parcel ID: 136025 CO Issue Date: 10113/15 Location: 22 BURNING TREE LANE Zoning Classification: RESIDENCE F DISTRICT Owner: LOUGHNANE, AUDREY M Proposed Use: DEVELOPABLE LAND 26 POINT HILL RD WEST BARNSTABLE, MA 02668 Village: WEST BARNSTABLE Gen Contractor: WALUCK, BRUCE Permit Type: RTC2 RES TEMP CO 2NO Comments: 60 DAY TEMP C.O. EXPIRES 12110115 SITE WORK NEEDED 12/10/15 Building Department Signature Date.Signed Expiration Date Town of Barnstable Building Department - 200 Main Street " . * Hyannis, MA 02601 9�A 16.39. A.�' (508) 862-4038 rF0 MA'S Certificate of Occupancy Temporary . Application 201306534 CO Number: 20150177 Parcel ID: 136025 CO Issue Date: 08110/15 Location: 22 BURNING TREE LANE Zoning Classification: RESIDENCE F DISTRICT Owner: LOUGHNANE, AUDREY M - Proposed Use: DEVELOPABLE LAND 26 POINT HILL RO WEST BARNSTABLE, MA 02668 Village: WEST BARNSTABLE Gen Contractor: WALUCK, BRUCE Permit Type: RTCO RES TEMP CERT OF OCCUPANCY Comments: 60 DAYS EXPIRES 10/1 Oil 5 10/10/15 Building Department Signature Date Signed Expiration Date 4f z� - TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUirding ZHE 201306534 `* BARxsrAel.E, Issue Date: 11/19/13 Permi t 9 MASS. �ArFG 3NI9.P't A�� Applicant: Permit Number: B 20132937 Proposed Use: DEVELOPABLE LAND Expiration Date: 05/19/14 Location; 22 BURNING TREE LANE Zoning District RF Permit Type: NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME Map Parcel 136025 a r Permit Fee$ 2,601.00 Contractor WALUCK,BRUCE Village WEST BARNSTABLE App Fee$ 100.00 License Num 069753 Est Construction Cost$ 510,000 Remarks APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND TTA CONSTRUCT A 3 BEDROOM SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ACH D 2t4WCARD MUST BE KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL GARAGE INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH Owner on Record: LOUGHNANE,AUDREY M BUILDING SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL A FINAL Address: 26 POINT HILL RD INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. WEST BARNSTABLE,MA 02668 Application Entered by: RM Building Permit Issued By: THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET,ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF,EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY. ENCROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NO SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION. STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAYBE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF FIVE CALL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: 1.FOUNDATION OR FOOTINGS. 2.SHEATHING INSPECTION 3.ALL FIREPLACES MUST BE INSPECTED AT THE THROAT LEVEL BEFORE FIRST FLUE LINING IS INSTALLED. 4.WIRING&PLUMBING INSPECTIONS TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FRAME INSPECTION. 5.PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS(FRAME INSPECTION). 6.INSULATION. 7.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. WHERE APPLICABLE,SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS. WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE VARIOUS STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION. PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED Aj NOTED ABOVE. PERSONS CONTRACTING WITH UNREGISTERED CONTRACTORS DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO GUARANTY FUND(as set forth in MGL c.142A). POST THIS CARD SO THAT IS VISIBLE FROM THE.STREET BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS 1 '$Fab 0'X 1 �hcJ ( AS 1 /15 oK zo6,/iy 1 C- _ t M 2 aft/" its r�1 ie 2 7 3 l-r� - _ 2/ gF«" seru o 4:�' I4 Lw6r o�Fb� T��tP Cep 3 1 Heating Inspection Approva s Engineering Dept Fire Dept PX Fl/14 2 Board of ealt 3�(L aoi 3_ 31 Bk 29804 P9132 036192 107-19-2016 & 10 2- 29a When recorded please return to: Bruce W Waluck Susan E Waluck PO Box 273 i. Harvard, MA 01451 DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE The CAPE COD COOPERATIVE BANK, of Hyannis, Massachusetts, holder of a mortgage from Bruce W Waluck and Susan E Waluck to the CAPE COD COOPERATIVE BANK dated July 22, 2014 and recorded in the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds in Book 28277, Page 177 acknowledges satisfaction of the same. In witness whereof the said CAPE COD COOPERATIVE BANK has caused its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed, acknowledged, and delivered in its name and behalf by Jessica Davis, its Assistant Vice President this 8th day of July,2016. THE C E COD COOP E TIVE BANK By: .��c Jessic Davis,Assistant Vice President .� . Q. rc 3y. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS County of Barnstable %11 On this 8th day of July, 2016, before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared Jessica Davis, Assistant Vice President proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification,being my own personal knowledge of the identity of the signatory, to be the person whose name is listed above, and acknowledges to me that he/she/they signed the foregoing instrument voluntarily of his/her/their own free act and deed and of said corporation, for its stated purpose. 7 A A. BYRN JE$SICE Notary Public• N Public: Jessica A Byrne eoMµorm�a�lt+of w+nsaAcltusrt: M Commission Expires: October 21 2022 My cone 21. 2on 022ris Y 1? � October _ SEAL HERE i PROPERTYLOCATION: 22 Burning Tree Lane, West Barnstable,MA BARNSTABLE REGISTRY OF DEEDS John F. Meade, Register Bk 28277 Ps177 -032357 07-22-2414 a 1 1 = 52cx After Recording Return'To: Cape Cod Cooperative Bank 26 Benjamin Franklin Way Hyannis, MA 02601 Property Address: 22 Burning Tree Lane West Barnstable,MA 02668 [Space Above This Line For Recording Data]— MORTGAGE DEFINITIONS Words used in multiple sections of this document are defined below and other words are defined in Sections 3, 11, 13, 18,20,and 21.Certain rules regarding the usage of words used in this document are also provided in Section 16. (A) "Security Instrument"means this document,which is dated July 22,2014 ,together with all Riders to this document. (B) "Borrower"is Bruce W Waluck and Susan E Waluck Borrower is the mortgagor under this Security Instrument. (C) "Lender"is Cape Cod Cooperative Bank Lender is a Cooperative Bank organized and existing under the laws of Massachusetts .Lender's address is 25 Benjamin Franklin Way,Hyannis,MA 02601 Lender is the mortgagee under this Security Instrument. (C-1)"Mortgage Broker"is NONE Mortgage Broker's post office address is and Mortgage Broker's license number is MASSACHUSEI'IS—Single Fanuly—Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT Form 3022 1/01 MASSACHUSETTS GreatOoca• REM 190OL1(040913) (Pays 1 Of 15) v M . , UAOAM_UD rap {CO .. Im cc) WrIlryff-TN Er 0 Er Certified Mail F F I C I A L y U S �CO $ Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee as appropriate) \�.- ❑Return Receipt(tuudoopy) $ "� `G T r3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) S ' " R l q�fre,ark 0 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ [UI frlere Q ❑Adutt Signature Required $ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ p g � S Postage ��SQS S .D $ E:] Total Postage and Fees r-I Sent To O � tre Zad1:4,474 d o.,of ox o. I .. _----- � r Certified Mail service provides the following benefits: ■A receipt(this portion of the Certified Mail label). for an electronic return receipt,see a retail ■A unique identifier for your mailpiece. associate for assistance.To receive a duplicate ■Electronic verification of delivery or attempted return receipt for no additional fee,present this delivery. USPS®-postmarked Certified Mail receipt to the •A record of delivery(Including the recipients retail associate. o signature)that is retained by the Postal Service— Restricted delivery service,which provides 111 for a specified period. delivery to the addressee specified by name,or to the addressee's authorized agent /mportaat Reminders: Adult signature service,which requires the t.s:. ■You may purchase Certified Mall service with signee to be at least 21 years of age(not First-Class Mail®,First-Class Package Service®, available at retail). r x or Prioriiy Mail®service. Adult signature restricted delivery service,which ■Certified Mail service is not available for requires the signee to be at least 21 years of age 1 International mail. and provides delivery to the addressee specified ■Insurance coverage is notavailable for purchase by name,or to the addressee's authorized agent. with Certified Mail service.However,the purchase (not available at retail). of Certified Mall service does not change the ■To ensure that your Certified Mail receipt is Insurance coverage automatically included with accepted as legal proof of mailing,it should bears•' certain Priority Mail items. USPS postmark.If you would like a postmark on ■For an additional fee,and with a proper this Certified Mail receipt,please present your ti endorsement on the mailpiece,you may request Certified Mall item at a Post Office'for the following services: postmarking.If you don't need a postmark on this -Return receipt service,which provides a record Certified Mail receipt,detach the barcoded pardon of delivery(including the recipients signature). of this label,aifix it to the mailplece,apply You can request a hardcopy return receipt or an appropriate postage,and deposit the mailpiece..' electronic version.For a hardcopy return receipt, complete PS Form 3811.Domestic Return , Receipt;attach PS Form 3811 to your mailpiece; IMPORTANT.Save this receipt for your records. PS Forrn 3800r April 2015(Reverse)PSN 7530-02-000.9047 p o BarO 1p^ IN .. • Im CO . I1ir OFFICIAL USE c13 Certified Mail Fee N' CD $ r/ostmark SF�ctre Services& ees(check boxadd lee as appmpdae1U) ❑Return Receipt(handcopy) $ M'O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $O ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ MC3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ M Ile ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ C3 Postage G� .A $ p Total Postage and Fees ,n a �T� S... o ------ - o. --¢-- J--------------- ....... .. Gi .;Yj,.,Vt et9. 48o x-N - ----------------D----------c=ZI 1 57, � Certified Mail service provides the following benefits: ■A receipt(this portion of the Certified Mail label). for an electronic return receipt,see a retail ■A unique Identifier for your mallplece. associate for assistance.To receive a duplicate ■Electronic verification of delivery or attempted return receipt for no additional fee,present this it delivery. USPSO-postmarked Certified Mail receipt to the ■A record of delivery(including the recipients retail associate. signature)that is retained by the Postal Service' Restricted delivery service,which provides ^_ for a specified period. delivery to the addressee specified by name,or to the addressee's authorized agent Important Reminders. Adult signature service,which requires the ■You may purchase Certified Mail service with signee to be at least 21 years of age(not First-Class Mail®,First-Class Package Service®, available at retail). or Priority Mali®service. Adult signature restricted delivery service,which ■Certified Mail service is notavallable for requires the signee to be at least 21 years of age intemational mail. .I and provides delivery to the addressee specified ■Insuranpe coverage Is notavailable for purchase by name,or to the addressee's authorized agent. with Certified Mail service.However,the purchase (not avaliabie at retail). of Certified Mall service does not change the ■To ensure that your Certified Mail receipt is Insurance coverage automatically included with accepted as legal proof of mailing,it should bear a certain Priority Mail items. USPS postmark If you would like a postmark on ■for an additional fee,and with a proper this Certified Mail receipt,please present your endorsement on the mailpiece,you may request Certified Mall Item at a Post Office'for the following services: postmarking.If you don't need a postmark on this -Return receipt service,which provides a record Certified Mall receipt,detach the barcoded portion of delivery(including the recipient's signature). of this label,affix it to the mallpiece,apply You can request a hardcepy return receipt or an appropriate postage,and deposit the mailpiece. ' + electronic version.For a hardcopy return receipt, complete PS Form 3811,Domestic Return Receipt,•attach PS Form 3811 to your mailpiece; IMPORTAN1.Save this receipt for your records. Ps Form 3800,April 2015(Reverse)PSN 7530-02-000-9047 r Town of Barnstable oFTHE, Regulatory Services Richard V. Scali,Director AMA BAMS "M ; Building Division BARNSTABLE Thomas Perry, CBO 1639-2014 ATEO N p Building Commissioner 575 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.maxs Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 April 15, 2016 Mr. Bruce W. Waluck Mrs. Susan E. Waluck 22 Burning Tree Lane West Barnstable, MA 02668 Dear Bruce and Susan, It is spring and the runoff from your property is still flowing onto your neighbor's property. Enough time has passed for you to mitigate and contain the runoff on your property. You therefore are ordered to come up with an engineered plan and start work on that plan within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Furthermore, you are hereby ordered to satisfactorily complete the work within 60 days of receipt of this letter, If you choose not to act on this order or are unable to meet the deadlines imposed by this order further action will be taken by this office and serious repercussions should be expected. Thank you for your immediate attention, By Order, Robert McKechnie Local Inspector Building Department 508-862-4033 Robert.mckechnie@town.barnstable.ma.us , pW ks - ar �� ~ x ' X Legend � - �; `.:.<k_••q,...• Spot Heights(NAVD88) Intermediate , Contours AV � Index Contours NAVD88 $ � � reels , r I Pa }}t fit1 :�: Y ,r `:• ��` Town Boundary :..`r:. ' Railroad Tracks t '4# Buildings 7 8 i• 9 .:� �•` 136 � Painted Lines : 814 ots <:: �`:... `136�5 i Parking L 3Q r Paved � .• :�•.;'`'�=t�', :; .:�: �. � ._� Unpaved :..: .. .r �- ��;:� �•y j •Driveways JJ: j.: :... �; ,rf� ••.�. � � �.�� � � �.r 0 Paved Unpaved Roads . > • f: ® Paved Road r _ Unpaved Road Bridge Paved Median it V Streams ' ..::: . t . 91t ater Bodies t �x� �•• Marsh # v -3560 � �t #4 51 . _33 u.. 43602-4 ~`. . n� r� #13- Osff y .. a f } .. - . ....._....._...... ..._........_.. Map printed on: 7/27/2017t •'-: This map is for illustration purposes only.It is not Parcel lines shown on this map are only graphic Town of Barnstable GIS Unit adequate for legal boundary determination or representations of Assessor's tax parcels.They are Feet regulatory interpretation.This map does not represent not true property boundaries and do not represent 367 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 026oi 83 167 an on-the-ground survey.It may be generalized,may not accurate relationships to physical objects on the map 5o8-862-4624 reflect current conditions,and may contain such as building locations. Approx. Scale: 1 inch = 83 few cartographic errors or omissions. giSt?a town.barnstable.ma.us i 4 �o�or .awar■u► r�i i N�au■-- - -:w���ws\ ■f��i s��r � "�� !�� =".�rY�'.. ■III ■,11'_ �■III■� I ■ ■!ul " I. alai'� � ' • aiwT■:"r fill � ...■a��;. �I III ■IIl1 I�111� I� wl ■�u.� I .�■I��;� � �■i• .aa■■Ir.'.w.�l.0_ ■l�li � ws � ■11,■I h �I Il u 1■■ .��ss■��..■...■.■.�w�.n�aaarr►\ � �-lit p � mw■.. _�w�ws��m ...��■w■ �.Y_ . n.a .■swt.woi ww � w■■�®_�.w■ n.. . ■mow. — ■■L■. I ���e-- � swr= —._���a■�r■■a . — —a�'i■r —'-vs■Ils. I.-- -�_= ■0�1�� � ��— - fin' f �_ ■� s��t..w.a= ■�1� =lawa■w = ♦l■.� �a�_ ■_�.�■ � �.w �■�_ ■ I = � ��� f■r.� _� -- - _ ■ I= ■l11 =I■a ■i � _ -- J s r t.r���_ I■I�i Ciu� ■IA.1 =PE ■i■■ I e j ■ �i ! �■s ■I��( _ �I■� r ..ate■. E s _. a'�:�= IIII = ........I= ICI■II _��■■.: _ �I■1 _roomMI. `�"--' C�= 11 ■I�!1 � li R_ Ill I =:= IlI l m.i�' a I �! i ilw.■u.�i�'i ilrsmtttU. ■p■1� �11 _--_� _-__— EEC _---_ _ ram �'- ' �•- _-` ,- i NMI FA lei O C�� ■I1,�1 � ■■' III�I f� . �ELF �I III _�I�i,C� ■ � �� I�r���y,; '��r-■i �1_�I !■� �.w'Lii.■alrr�uw' !■I■ ■_■ ■Il = ■ �� 'i'unl. � t's'�'Y'%� ' ��e. .a�■r�w. r ��.+,_ �w rr.�r.wfs■o s� Ilf�Z+°?2�I - — — _ i I I I 1 I i1111 ■111� '1�_I� .�..'�9 � ���_� ■■;1 ■�aar..W<va 1_IIII_�iurWr,�..■1� � ia.WW■u■■w�a+s lal■■laa�■. , a.a;11111 �■I■ 111� laAa1 ....,o�=.>.-..�. 111■ �-�- llll Will ■ •r. Kill i■i _� .mow■.■.-w...■..a ■ t.a 1■■ .emu ■W■■■■■ 1111_I■l■s■■an;� --II s ■asw ■■.l ' .W■n fralwr■l.ww� i' �"�': ■; io.i aril ■■�■1Fi ■1 i1 .:--- - ■�� ■�■I■■■I ■� ■I■ i_ 1�1 �� 1�� '�,_ uw 1■ ---- -I-- - --- ail � 1■.■ ■� 1 I.W laa.a■..�ua - - - �t o ,3; \ ' .n �■ WI O' mod., +;�. ■��. =ElMmm■ _�� 1� 1■� ■1� ■I p 11`'1 1■1 ■II� \ ti af'v'�' � � <o;1■, r�� i'W1.■■rl- 1 jai l.�f.� t 1 �1 _1 ■ �r 1 1�1 �1� � � ■■j�■11r1 ■■ ■1.1'�' I■■■■ri1■!� __II G i W 1■ I. ■I ��it ��j 9 y e,., 1■II��N. °°' ■■ ■� ■■� ■ ■■W.wr■■r �� ��� ■�'I �■I� 11 � ■■ d � �•s Iti� :;�.�,���;-. �16(wlo_ W�wLi �'■.mow-"-�r..wi t.rww ■!:■.■1 �I� ■■ � l �I'� ilk '��� � Gig �� a '� '::;,;� ��at��,��,�;a3 �l�lil� � , - i 11 � ���.— --■wI—�� 0—LaY.� Ira=��Y vl. ■...� W.ygas o■°w� .l Lp ---� ■,LR Z'is■� NOR a . INN WIN / I I� ■I�'1 � 11 ■�__1 �11�1 I ;_■1_1_1111_II1 � � \�� 1 � � I'■i111', ;��I1 1111 1 ;1 III ■IIl lilll I I �� ��a rr i ��--- e1■.W. i t SMOKE dETECTORS REVIEWED BARNSTABLE BUILDING II����r11 �l_ � � � ,� � -�:� —_ ._ _ —=__—__--_----=—_-- ---- —_—--_--- •,.�,.>� DING DEPT. DATE FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE BOTH SIGNATURES ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING 1�T rT'-ire�'I_.iT•..L r-'��P �-. IrL —�-- ----fto fu'Efi-I CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS --E-RI UILDING CODE ii: �� --_-- -- - ------=- — ate.-. •. I. ... - t"-'� —r�l I I'=o-1- -r ` - IL��TI�11 - I�c� q� �i r ll ,.L �-�uI I I�--1 4T`t - "1S - - �J_C L To J ..-L_1. '-L �L}r-1•Y P" 1 I I I ��� - �i'II f I Tf- -r n� 1 . I T' L Li_I I I _lJ I I - — . -_ ���flT' C7 •v —1 iy�4 o O Jn'• J_ Z—�_' ,,'I — _— r--r-1-4a' I _ _11'_I--'_�=t I \ I �• --6A 1_�I�i T EP•i h W 11_54.. j w n . wHl-T� 'GEOv.P•i_�-� I I ..I.�- �- •I' =1 _ _. w T I \ -�' • _ � I._i -T TIT' ' - L, __—__ _I .:n ELK,._ '�-- T1 17 I 1 Tt r I1; I.J t- _u T-r=T LLl 1,4 . .1+ ,;?r '"-�.=�,�=-=.-{ FSGP.o5c=.0--:.PEES rOEti1-C E'-Fpfi • _ J �9 .� 771 oN s -E_. '�_ t - - III , _ � � :.I ��'%. ,�, %• :✓. .ice �.i�I♦I�_�i�I .moo. ��1- IIII ■ � � .1.:�'■.� 1 . " 1 1111� 11� I 1 ' ; �I�1 11..'P■'o _.L1.�... �IIII_II 1111� � C■�.� �I�� III III � _ 1 ul.�.��'�o ��� I'emu � � 111 If�11 1 I�, � �- 1■.�...�..� �CC".■>'■.C.� ■■! `� I I■ 111 111�1� � �,...-s..s;.• ;■, ����:.�.n ■1�■�"1i 1♦ I 1 ICI Ill 11■I■ ■Y■YA h 1� ■■� ■III ■ py �¢�''rr�f ���� 1Y�■�.�■� --I ( ■III III■� ■� ���C;�;I '�C� .��• �'� 1■�1��i�ly�■W - I �Y■ ��. � 1� 1�_■ ■ril�l'.Til �1 � ■l� � � �+III �e �3 _ lot �,I, I, ' �.'' of �r 4i\ +. n r'cr1 a16wI i II:I ■■1� _■(�. 1� �� Eli r r[ ■ reL I � �i •� wow ,'1 .L��r�w ��w I �.��■■L!•. __ 4. ._- �/.r�iy��l 'E:C� 1 --icf�� - _ .__ ,_- r - .ra..-=_"+Vm�-s�- ..:..'.•...-_�.. � - - - -_ '_ �=a .- ._-- Iill`I` v �■►— � w I�� _ II �II:1� III �I111 ■III; IIIII�� li_1 '����� ■1111� rll'1 ■III 11111 III 1■It� I I�I'� �• i - .- — - — LQY..rwv.wm��w����� www��„���ti�ws■1 � - � ■ ■I�I�■ WWIr � .�u,�■ ail.�'il � -- .■ ' III HIM ISO REA - i I I ' Ito'-o" 12`-o Z'-CP 0 i 6� 4 ° CSFm Gam- q o -d', iI O D N SEIaKti.tiBQi�- 'NT,12�11!1 IN � 4° F_G.OIJC P_iETE JI - T 7O I JEF'T_a E.c I h g - Q 8 - p 1 � 2-Cn„ 0 q -5 - _ 4' v` �- co _ OF It c^ 0 _ •� fi eF t o _e 1 O S _J3" 3'_6n li I o - I�( :w_I2 x3SeeaaM— O 01 ` - r. l?i 1 _ cLosCr .-- z� DTf\f1 NP�oaM.= a p =_ST_l1_D - s T -- _- JL v `"J I -OA _ -- - - '- - 0 -- -' i I c0 OA 14' D 4' ^ . I _roT4_P_Lia�Fo 5-T_cP_ I -1' DIt IQI-Cn d p u i '�.•-(v 1 '-q Z`-9B'- O° • _tom o�.5__ -'��--o--o—'j' 3 a'-o' I-::;:ALL-G:ON'.S.T'.P_iti�_C-T1.0) 1 5:�-1A�L_aE tN GONFOP�wnG.w1G� " A _ -v�T<-1.E.MASyAGH�JSC�Ti/ S�'A�"L'.BU�LO�w� cOOC..�.Awi�.AU. . -- c t1 _A Ll oswq EKl'S1 oN -5`ti A'.Ct aL vs�r 1c o_.e�-ricc ov.N g - - _"_ .AC3_�lC-_ GE1J'E{3�L'__C•'4.N TF.SIaC-'rD-P�--PP_-�J'OP7 YOTt.1[, ST�+�'�" _ - _ - __ __ p7{4 o.PoS��"pp- FS 6�OLPLC'.E_ o ' IJ ESP,u'ce 5 SusY+N wa;.Lu-c Ci TF3GE.00.n[E` �•-�' 1 /�, _.wL'''L-.BAPiN'S=T.Ri�C���5.�A�iC>, t •... Scams_-� „_-1'-0, F1_135T.._. coa� P.�A�1 —. -- 3 4 Cc� I 06 10 ai N' -•- r d- _ v a° 6' �L^ 8_l�'' T- __ 6E5ntiABcrt - LP IYl 1 -- - S6LA..L-IS�Kl.GLO I ; _� ( _ ASS.*� I1 I, -car.- H Co I e-�,e'-a: I 5 - { - - co "; _m NI .rIEN:t5�iE0-?y:_uH��GnreOr 1 I 4" -'2'6° _ ___ 'Cc�4•_a1T_Y -- ZIA-1,El�CC5.RE0. I K• e - r g - o I \9 : _ -- =0 'x-Lv lO \ a ice'-vi 1 t'-v - - — 0- - -cr _ _ _ 11 �•' ICI," 4_4 LP O O O I I �o I „ 4-O ' (4 -O 1 Ul r v 'L-Cu' ti-co° 'L-td 2-l0 -1p" y'-0 c7'-O' W_On S'-O'' 4o1 d, `71 'O1 .1 I g'-o" 2 - I 'f Gt�LE 1'Af�pP . S.CQGi'GE--P_F5.0:P o5LO__.f3E _yUy;Qwr w FOP) __W. Tti�L..MA�/�j.AGli tJ�ii �i.TP�TG a��.l��o•�..,�Go nc - _ggLlcE"_q_ ,�NA�uc✓, =� _t=l'l'_C7-Ic1—C ,f'��I ' -..Oiy�sePih=nnlr� T3•[E..C„-Im�.IGP�nL c�wl'rg,.�c-oa•, 'w>=`zT=6A1�;!�1 gTrSB Ltj"I:A"4'S!iA,G_wuSElfh TFS�o.6_T_o_Tt-VL�- _G.�4TOIa- . G_o,1 C? P L Awl MI GHN�EVICL tt 142- 0 i 11 -0 Lo <. VOL � f CfaF�AC�E I •.! 5 -o CV-o'- �7` 0 �i' 0 5'-Co" �i' ' 4'_—�^� 4 O L III co _ ! c0 _I 1--I L -J 1 L ! o L L _I IL1 SLAB w�w.w F _1 L. J L _I L. 1 I- � N `➢ I _ I -f'�EAM=PGf;ET _ co m - I 0 ':CIt- Lx_�t E'1Ei+.M_-� r 7 1-' �' I- _f r 1 r t- 7 1- 1 -7 1- i cr 1 . 9 0 L J L I_ _.1 L _ L -I i_J 1—• 1 I 1 I I I i 25' - 4„ I I 4_'RT - - 1'L--�-�-r i •a_� —_-—--- ——_J =N s0 -Co, __.h4=uTNc�FPiOGI'G�OL\ ao`T.—I I I i _ --I LL ---- -` 20'- o .4W.V. CONGPReZE'FP;OST._ 4Pti�_; ro_o_G..IC� 8`H,, GONGF,cSE FpuNOATON . _ 0'_N w'1F ooT�G Eo uNOATi O,.t 38, o„ 1 G; N:O'TE 5 1 i w_�2EL —M--A95_l1 rr"7 5'�A'1"C-�'.@�l�i:.O�-N _Cc1C5E AND - e-��E�,.. � —�Q V._N���A�1 O f�l.-----P��_All\1._ -P.��o.Po-s_co_�E:s.aE`•�cE�s -'-=':.AtiDTi�E_ ENEPia�1_.—..GO:a"1"f3J�-CTC?`i:.:PFSfOF'i :Tp_T1=1'C-:-STAFyT '-- wE5 __BP_:F5N5��$C�bt1A�t�1tGA115E7�5 3.=A �: F�LJNCA'T�.Ot�1 _S'fJOTiI.o.�J.C�-5 _sSa•1AL1e 6E Four�t� oil._ _FON.IATl�N��A-1 -_L1t=LL7_C5-T_.IPP�B.E'D_'--'�i.L1LT_A8_L�. - _=DgAWt.S-P.iY—_ Dl1T_t<-_moo 13=- — no F i d' �K r���--�•-L.LD�7Lq a � e r -0 _, 01 X1 x - lip d - d 3 "-.5_o_�eo-�� oe Iti�� `Xl < � i i _—'2-scl.!L':_1or$.S_9-�=4'=ts",_�_G- •� i =LL�T_ES= -L,_�C�CQIV:-S.T_Li.d:GTI:'ON.=SAv"ALt__6�L.-'a�rs-cor�f-_r_=of?�r�t:P.�1c� A<-L GA� pn �:SrP.CG-3.1J rLD�t =CoDw�D -�C::R_ST-. ._F-L QOF -F E 'Z.=A-t:- I M_Et�S:S 1:oN ' 2 N Sfy Eta CAN t._ AVID THE- ENE:_/>L=Go►a _P5,A�- TOv�_Pi;i'OR,:Ta_;ry�yTAgT w.ES-t �A�wL' �, ASrAzu.u:SE7Ly MAIN l , iY • � �4l - 01 I . 2x l0 ,�p�STS =O � t OIL +s,- I — - - -Ll - _ — ------ � I I 1.4j"Ji - p 2 ro _ o o �oL TS M- lv" o.�. L � �LX Ib Ja15T5 IGo'� OGi Zx �O �Ol�iTs @IG.o'"0.�, ( Vf - _r.. :,L�c�co"�5_T_ti.u=cT1_o_t�'S•�l:ta"":�.E:_�►a-::c��,,�oq►..�fnaisc`_ w1z►.�.� __ _ . _N�iiS�zAU��LSE"1Ty_ .STATE.. �U�w_��.1 _.000.E eahlo AI�L::I:.OGA1= -' -Q--pip, A `A Ate- —Pt�:OPOSE�D PEE=`7.f:GEK1GE-_:.FOPy_ A _-- /At�UGIK..- iL :/ LSD.\MEN'plOt�1_S-�SNA t__'0G'_V..E1�t'G1Cp-6( .Y_F1E-Uv.t�lEpi�SnZO-TFIt -_S:GALE=�'I e�-'�S'-- - - W BApi►.16mis, A54AG-Ii55ETrl _CiEt�Ef�_AL_..G.OIJ_T_(�AG_i._O�-PP.j.1_OF5'=T0_TNC=�T.AP�-�-QF CCSI.!- —' -- — C_� �T1. 1-- 5Ec_oN�_FCOOf .: FFSAM N.C, EHJ� - • `2+z=P'O P_'k�F�3�!@=1'GuO.G. ---�--- . i I Q U J h r V 17 = ro m Q , r` N I + I II CO:p5__Nr—M.EC'i!7:'@=ttv_".:o-.ta- I I:AzL�C: 'Ala G'_Co�.l 5e1Ya��=pE�a�:c_c�o_a�lr_o�'iMe�vJc�_w��n1t uSEzc�i S-T_'AT'L-B.VLL.O�tJ G-. c'op� Ati110-_ALL.._l_ocAL — -PP>of�'o.��p=F_5'ES:1:O.E=�S�•K QF� 2, A-� ::_ ..til�N_3_e_aN-5--5.w1o:c�._e�C__VEP�-ter=_e�D.....�Yi� Eow55_.Aiao� -'—'-- �•t _sc..g.�,►"'is` ss�d=—,..M1�5h:cNu:q. i_ =_C1A'E:C�:E"1:1F_C'�-AL=.G:ONTAA:-GTOP =-_P_:F'.i-IaP_�=TO:'i-FiE_:�-J_'T�af3-T..=G2i~'=cQN'S7-p)U'C.`PfCN -P,00F__rP�Nm- DATE 4 C� 2.Oi�j • w � r , HC�t=-FP31aM'r P_t ti t� C9rz�C�CiEB6PP�p--- -- ---\\ '. \ /----- L•��=2x:10.�ra'FL'A.T --- I��,-[�"''�Y�.�_C'v[S'�. —. L 2x1-2 T6_FSAFIEF,JL-LU'-0-G- —--.. 1� ?ieKo-o�AFTOF'�h:Q-'--- - .. i CE `!°"O.C- MPSob,.1 142,h TL1O 5..@ i_:a'o.G• d - - -LTor e�w,�n..� �— �2 I.-' - -- wA`I,._.uT�=PJ�2 - �'Lx , — 9'-0 2X'rOJo15T5@.ICy`IO.C, ro �2 i _ 5-ew-nPgoN u 2,S •L-rOP o oo...� . 2xCo5Tu p @ I( "O.C.- TOP ow w•uon.• r r 4'-0 : 9_i2x35' �- W.y I TE GCOpRj'S F4LNC,LLS _ I -- m N C� ' , CD -14 — NGCE- `6'�' 2xl� S iLC I P.T• �_ - to.__(�T__S tCL. " I GGNGPiC-CE-8 r ( C3�1x_I�L-�E[aM w.13'11- I :6��GouGP,'L�-E. FbUUOA- I „ I EPf0.5T WALL' I w�4"x�o"r'C�k.��.OP•�' � -1 — I �L�L�,.�lsQc4LM�t" I I �• 4!`'Go N�E'CE -.FooT:cts Ci-' --�_o�o_r._,n��j I '� � I I -aECT_l gu 6BF.Fi._M EMQ(iAwIG _._.�A:�E't'iZO.O:DECKtw�Ct GAT•-,AZt: �$ Feercq 7S2�FS5 o'/ �1h1DrBS_E.N=Tcs2-r��10-- - —_(- -IL- -2=Cvrtc_8 - {_LnL(�E{�=_lP�=. L`1C�- %- P,T-_LEO cg QL —.-_—G=G=S P C:.tf�9DEN TK11 P�T, A►�_EE +:Etil�'3' �— �4 2_ _ _ _ A v6G _Co-� 7 Z?ilM: tMioy 2 ZS�I:Cf_ e etc oci -�— - S_��5�—— -�.U�t�—CS�v _ _SAFETY -LAZI --' -- - � —•--.`__�-- I -- - _ .� - x _ --v,--- _ S E�CT V.C)-mil-. -o-- -F- l:1ll .E -0. .. .1 g Lt-----S�s5rL 5e"4 -5caL-e--114: r.or-- 3 �{;--TOP.OFWINODWS -I`-4°OFF'OF F'i;OG7�} ---==Ex.G6PT-..pD„.W_tNOO.W_5......--- -------__ 04 - Co___2o13 `� ®,-�� VARIANCE REQUESTED BARNSTABLE TOWN CODE 397-2 REMOVE ALL UNSUITABLE SOILS ENCOUNTERED BENCH MARK MINIMUM 40.000 sf FOR NEW WITHIN THE SOIL REMOVAL AREA FOR FIVE TOP OF CONC BOUND 34 CONSTRUCTION INVOLVING WELL LATERAL FEET DOWN TO THE C2 MEDIUM ELEVATION =36.00 3S • AND SEPTIC - VARIANCE TO SAND STRATUM AS INDICATED ON PLAN AND BARNSTABLE GIS OATEN 3694.g6 ft • 3S.199 sf REQUESTED. REPLACE WITH CLEAN MEDIUM SAND PER TITLE S. A DEED RESTRICTION LIMITING THE ADDITIONAL SURVEY MAY BE REQUIRED AFTER 38 DWELLING'S BEDROOM CAPACITY TO CLEARING OF LOT. ft .. THREE SHALL BE RECORDED PRIOR b,.j6 RSA•.•+ TO THE ISSUANCE OF A DISPOSAL POOL HOUSE TO CONSIST OF ONE ROOM. WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. / ��,..�•��. .PIT 1 / O PROPOSE SOIL • . •. ABSORPTION SYSTEM 3 38 ft 0,3 ON BA CKIL � oA't �N to SA t i� m�`�S'°!. O � SOIL 3 w 9D Qe `7- ApEA© D►BQX � N �� ' 9O� ?D� I500 GALLON Q SEPTIC TANK" �Nv\. ROp R pO M � :Z.� 100 o ED 4G Q 8 B D� L�r1 DN To EL ' 36- ° �� LOT 1 , \ � g EXISTING O h `yD AREA = 35200 s�+- .� WELL ccO ASSR MAP 136 Pa 25 <� O 1 J PROPOSED EXISTING ,- WELL ' / WELL -FOR ON USED FOR IRRIGATION w !! 'Po ' ,c � ;� SE�NON vorASIE DOMES C b p o \ EXISTING LOT 9 1' 9qy USE 34 AGE 1 A� o \ WELL ASSR MAP 136 Pa 24 �F!! 35 a \ #26 POINT HILL ROAD N/F LOUGHNANE. JOHN & AUDREY ult�'� / LOT 13 ASSR MAP 136 Pa 28 3a9O PROPOSED '� *25 BURNING TREE LANE i� N/F STOLTE. ROBERT R \ WELL 6 SHIRLEY C TRS EXISTING 10• \ EXISTING \ ft�-- \ \ IV O \ \ THIS IS A \ COLOR PLAN FULL DETAIL IS BEST \ ; VIEWED IN FULL COLOR USE COLOR PLAN ONLY \ FOR SEPTIC INSTALLATION OF 114Ss'cy = \ \ G E , SETBACK \ T rvcY354418 y \ REQUIREMENTS ` OWED ZONE: RF-1 0 FRONT. 30 ft \ SIDE: 15 ft LOT 14 " PLAN 4 ASSR MAP 136 Pa 29 REAR: 15 ft ` � ,, SCALE: I In = 40 ft \ *S2 POINT HILL ROAD 40 80 N/F KILDUFF. KATHLEEN C "/ " 20 40 WEST BARNSTABLE. MA o "-�" 0 T� SITE AND SEWAGE O �DAVID4�a oF �cy �G C� DISPOSAL SYSTEM PLAN N QOP D. ��, DAD. � -FOR PROPOSED DWELLING ,•o�� � coN° 083WR H co No. 461 R H SUSAN 81 BRUCE NOT r SFG �� SOS C �� • • CLIENT W A L U C K .y TO SCALE o ONNI�� 22 BURNING TREE LANE �o o9q�6F9 a P-av l5c4 44usf 30, 2-013 WEST BARNSTABLE, MA DESIGN ENGINEER MUST SUPERVISE 43 TRIANGLE CIRCLE PROPERTY ADDRESS E aq Qh'ygY AND CERTIFY INSTALLATION OF SEPTIC SANDWICH MA 02563 SYSTEM. CONTACT ECO-TECH AT DATE: J U N E 29, 2013 L O C U S M A P INS 36 INSTALLATION BEFORE COMMENCING 508 3 6 4—0 8 9 4 INSTALLATION OF SEPTIC SYSTEM. PG. 1/2 ,.IOB, E T E—1812 0 ®01� TEST ®�5 OCTOBER 15. 2004 DESIGN. CALCULATIONS PERC NUMBER 10821 DESIGN FLOW: 3 BEDROOMS X 110 GPD = 330 GPD SOIL EVALUATOR: DAVID D. COUGHANOWR, LSE-461 WITNESSED BY: DONNA MIORANDI. HEALTH DEPT. SEPTIC TANK: 330 GPD X 2 DAYS = 660 GALLONS TEST PIT 1 2NO GROUNDWATER KF( IN C2 SOILS ENCOUNTERED INSTALL 1500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK (MINIMUM ALLOWED) DISTRIBUTION BOX:, USE 3 OUTLET D-BOX. ELEVATION DEPTH SOIL USDA SOIL SOL COLOR SOIL OTHER SOIL ABSORBTION SYSTEM: INSTALL A 24 ft x 12.5 ft x 2 ft HORIZON TEXTURE MONSEW MOTRW LEACHING GALLERY AS DEPICTED BELOW 35.50 Abet = ( 24 x;)2.5 ) = 300 sf 0-3 A LOAM 10 YR 212 NONE FRIABLE Asdw = ( 24 + .24 + 12.5 + 12.5 ) x 2 = 146 sf 3-20 B LOAMY SAND 10 YR 4/3 NONE FRIABLE Atot = 446 sf •i 20-84 Cl SILT CLAY LOAM 10 YR 5/4 NONE FIRM Vt = 0.74 x 446 = 330.04 GPD 27 Sp INSTALL A 24 ft x 12.5 ft x 2 ft GALLERY AS CONFIGURED BELOW �� WIBB C2 MEDIUM SAND 10 YR 6/3 NONE LOOSE - Vt = 355.2 GpP�Dy) 330 GPD REQUIREDD/ NO GROUNDWATER In - 2 ENCOUNTERED ®ISTRIB U IOUW BO/6 DBE3 H,OY TEST PIT 2 PERC AT lro In - 2 MIWIINCH IN C SOILS DIMENSIONS PIPES EXITING D-BOX TO RUN LEVEL ONDEPTH SOIL. USDA SOIL COL SOIL OTHER AND DETAIL FOR 2 FEET BEFORE PITCHING DOWN Fam34,10 HOFQ TEXTURE MOTnM 0-4 A LOAM 10 YR 212 NONE FRIABLE 4-22 B LOAMY SAND 10 YR 4/4 NONE FRIABLE NOT TO 12 /n 26.60 22-901. Cl SILT CLAY LOAM 10 YR 514 NONE FIRM SCALE MIN _... _ 9D-160 C2 MEDIUM SAND 10 YR 6/3 NONE LOOSE 2077 iA°IM ` ` To o p SAS r 00 GALLOI`9 SE61"TI T'ANK � b ST E MENSIONS AND DETAIL155 /n ,5 SECTION VIEW SE SHOREY ST-I500-H-IO I in NOT TAPER 8 TO SOIL ABSORPTION ��`' © SCALE S SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION DETAIL C5` USE SHOREY PRECAST 500 GALLON LEACHING DRYWELL - ° 5 ft- DRYWELL 24.0 ft 8 in UNIT cl c� /O ft-6 Jn 5 N z _ N cn C w INLET CENTER OUTLET STONE 3.5 ft ;8.5 ft 18.5 ft 3.5 ft COVER COVER COVER �? IN DROPFLOW LINE 50�0 GALLON-DRYWRL INSTALL ONE INSPECTION f RISER TO WITHIN THREE FROM = INCHES OF FINAL GRADE BUILDING 10 In 14 TO AND INDICATE LOCATION '^ D-BOX USES LET ON AS-BUILT PLAN 48 In LIQUID OAS LEVEL BAFFLE . 33 ov❑v In Opwwpa4��po0j' 6 In STONE BASE '~ vvovvv SEPARATION BETWEEN INLET AND ��� yam OUTLET TEES NO LESS THAN �b2 !" LIQUID DEPTH INSTALLER N PLACESOF SUBSTITUTE 2 In. PEASTONE LAYERT SPECIFIED. CROSS SECTION' VIEW CROSS SECTION VIEW 2 in PE4ST0nE 2 In PEASTOAE In FU2 in ORA EF rn is= [26 EFFECTI In DEPTH 461n 581n 461n GROUNDWATER ADJUSTMENT NOTES. I50 In EXISTING GROUNDWATER LEVEL BASED ON CONDITIONS OBSERVED 1) ALL COMPONENTS INSTALLED SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS IN TEST PI T I OF MASSACHUSETTS TITLE 5 SEPTIC CODE (310 CMR 15). OBSERVED GW NONE AT 19.83 2) ECO-TECH ENVIRONMENTAL RECOMMENDS THE INSTALLATION OF LOW FLOW &JSPECT/OIV PORT FIXTURES & APPLIANCES, AND BIANNUAL PUMPING OF THE SEPTIC TANK. INDEX WELL SDW-252 DETAIL ZONE 3) SYSTEM IS NOT DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND VEHICULAR LOADING. DO NOT READING DATE OCTOBER, 2004 PARK OR DRIVE VEHICLES OVER SEPTIC SYSTEM. 4) SEPTIC TANKS TO BE INSTALLED LEVEL AND TRUE TO GRADE ON A LEVEL 3 in MAX READING 47.58 STABLE BASE THAT HAS BEEN MECHANICALLY COMPACTED & ON TO WHICH SIX PVC CAP-s . ADJUSTMENT 1.7 INCHES OF CRUSHED STONE HAS BEEN PLACED TO MINIMIZE UNEVEN SETTLING. 4 In PERF PIPE-0- ADJUSTED OW BELOW 20.53 5) APPLY MAGNETIC LOCATING TAPE TO THE EDGES OF ALL CONCRETE t COMPONENTS AND TO THE TOP OF ALL PIPING. STONE -FLOW pG�3 %01FULE TOP OF FOUNDATION RAISE COVERS TO WITHIN ALL�PTIO TO BE CH. 40 PVC EL = 36.00 6 in OF FINAL GRADE -7 ANPITCH AT 1/8 In/ft MIN '• 34.75 34.75 D-BOA I 3 ft INSTALL TWO INSPECTION RISERS TO MAX WITHIN THREE INCHES OF SURFACE 8 �p ONE INSPECTION PORT IN LEACHING MTALL 31.77 GALLERY STONE. ]733.25 1500 GALLON li PRECAST������ ���� 31.75 30.40DRYWEL L'� L o,� :: ...r...�. in 32.00 SEE DETAIL ABOVE STONE SM AC�SORPTUON + 30.57 30.32 _ 4j 10 ft BASE , SYSTEM -SEE DETAIL o 6 In STONE BASE 46 ft ° 5 ft BELOW b) 12 ft 28.32 HIGHADJUS TED SEASONAL, V 0 GROUNDWATER 20.53 SITE & SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PLAN 22 BURNING TREE LN, W BARNSTABLE. MA DUNE 29, 2013 ETE-3737 PG 2/2 77 CA pe¢ C•OD BAY N . /O ? 14vbY � N60.r 1 'Il�v `, • '� Locus cl / � - 6PFor f J c h4 VOT1`: p! �P �' ` 9 fi/ ay /939 `P/O Zo9 p NON-BU/LDA8L6 y 5 �f PA EGEL 5 L' 0 �p Us 6 s sgNaW/c%/ gUgb. h N�'V $ �p8e2��5• Sc ALE /••=zoos' 9y/ 5�/./D'� �' 0068 "2 37. I fl�SOO'J4- ..cPosstic6r G IZBD-yG 0. Al 00' 21 ,�0 o�e¢7fLJ 9L� l9 287.5� H�8,1;.1338 W 1f 2 et• 23 / 13 �Y mOGQccla��93- '16.oZ Z 6y N '.lO •/OJ ♦ a G 0 0 ecyZB'�'' (rNWi 66 19 Q 0 ZEVNT FE• p? p14yL8r - 94.85 ti p8'e� 'Crouva) 9yy 1 192.18� V.Z6.19 ��d:5y� 66 �; 2h ,�65•l3 y�6� g3 _ 1 S3 ;♦.n /5480't � oP 185• y /O �. 58�+ �.`c o y ♦- 9 m m 35200 i•1 6 GD"t"i(d c"- 2g8•p660 1 �P 37e90^i' dl NN p/46•ot311 N 0 9• 1 "$ 51 o a - / 16o0Yg0 r;/ z 6z• q 3�p'q N VI I le /•50.0p A•4/.16 C,?H \♦ $.�'/ / 61 f.'CH 2 �_ '3 m •N __IP./23;37 \ :' Der CH, 130• 6 69 A136.39 N 160.00 5a s P r•2s40 j�L:$°s ,/ /♦. ,� �rl 50090°t o rME,-V �"v A y/ cuL, T. 1 \� e ae� 's 5p \L�k / 13NMjG o 133'Or9z7 / ♦ sAe13o S elk / L s� 51 ' 6 ✓fd 6 ;j 00. ♦ AO3 y''. / o s AN 1 95 ?40. a.� .--T 2 3 N3'•o r•.,g• 00 �1� /.� 'vIC �•fi /Z / NOW 0.2 K0.2ME72LY 1/ so � 50435".if v.'Y•N` T•?9.0.7 W a m v 5/4 w �' `�•'Z:�o 6=+ao: na?p. ♦ ,�O MO,o 00'1e W L/NI7SAY A72•yST20NG 14 p 36670•t„rya /./B A!) O' / ��// �`��r�a N a♦ O� 36/20`i N N °1 w V'1� 4p 40.21 h\?�`1 V1 .56660•p0/�9'sboo /� / ,� -S •/2"W /G�y /O (,D' D• ,.'2 /06 220./4 -f(iin(rypj 3 i5 r.I 1, ••0 Ob O' 6'LEA S. A o \b 4,o z rc w 3 B&•113 7I5226 0 9' fv P o of P /7 O �P /. `♦\ 2 i�pz$2 9.85 s/�� \35940 t�P9y942350 NO�\ 43625 t b�lb,ry / '�b�.•N_B4.2,Q_23"E Oa, 9 ��,,` ti b 0 c..93---4'� %' J A•5345 . '� %♦ (� ry r1/0 SdLr MGESN ' 4022o•t p P a•2y'ao �~. ♦ \ N 30 06"32'4 y0 i- _ 7. �� i�7NDOby /.•" y L, ie.79 �0 /2 00 Q� 00 /60.ao _ A h rV /9 0_ VE. Ao. o-w- 8 r: S9. v` / CHd/ZLES F. l 0)0' 'moo �No / //A•25,09 r /60.Oo /60.00 SO4.33 �Y / .38600 BERTHA M L/'LL/A.Pb '� i�sy / b,./>e•$S.oO o A• 6.14 / Boor 697 7,AGE 397 6♦ '\ .� 350os I, /• y 40$ oNf a srav�o' 0 e 622 59s a, l .r. I 26 O o 25 3 b' o° a E3. I o �� k 35/so•t m o`60 3.520o r ° m o �/ •=�L o♦b�� N N 352oo"t 'm N 36/30'Y $`Ci.R� ... :>."�Q�IQ / `C I ti N N N 04 `Q•-/" .. 20 /• 352oo'f / l �• N •�� '�s�A•16000 ♦y / 1\ / q' - N 230. 3o E 1 NB73630 E• I N 'q0 a 04 iD`�aa` d•/66 Oo'SO \T. _ S/i ` 'L y, 0j7(6 •/09.97: 6 L� 00 B7'36;30"E N 1 64°35 1.9'l• 0 O• 0 / , r •L- /60.00 - /J 2z I .•' 36200 t Z p 2 ss. 0 I 1 /60.00 -' - /70.00 - b po 1' 27 Qb 7 O 0\ ^h "01 p 29 0 O r A•S/.o0 Obq 35.A7 i� /90.0 2.4 i' 352oo et / 0 352oo•r , m o° 29 ^oi 30 z•rsy0 ,"� o o e0 y 3 0 1\\♦s /' 4 r i' N N 352oo'a p ro 3.5426't .� I`A•/ s6 y p /V Zs:� N N N 36070 f N V m a- OP i ' 35 73 5'J', ` /2'S i' L p S 0 r /T-26.C;1 4,5'3B N N N Or -Z I a i•.-- ,b p °L 7+7.4 Ae -1/ y - - C m A /60;r. p,h 0♦♦ 80ti "'o�' `-/o7.s4,,L- /60.00 l 7 L� yz oe•a3���_ 5� 2 6 0-_.�37 'Idyl i' 352oo'f i '9 6` s 97• -l67.2 /0g.9 3p 1 A '�oO'd/; / 0/./ did y d -2.56 A\ / .V ��3POo 29A%.�8.27 /$72.P.?v...o r w -;-Ai" 384.77 NA. 1yp 3 . 79• �// Ra o'J /zo.00 same.. h. 79- vrVO �3•e` 'L d^• 8• oO A, .07 g7.36' so-•�//LL/�qTc?DS • ' /60• ' �•J+ �`��by��` `Tm?2o p ,�/�l9 r :au .q.,- - 145 �_ p0 ♦" ., Y v 4 rypy M..: \`�•o0 6p�pQ e: y 5 '00 - - i6'. ti " 0 Ij'' / `'a. 35 .1 ' i isss o'f I/ 64.93 ♦`/�/ ' I oo \/ j`CuT\ A•6g99 1. 0 �.�-� 01 pi t %A, WNa N N /./q O 1� oo sc $ a5z o^t 0 352oo•t p �7ao'r •�N 3ea� �9 U0� Pn 3 ��_ 2•y� tia`'os��-_/Y ------_uN� ===NO 94B6N'3 Yol 10r/ /- ,�j •0�� ,p- �.q•lob. ��v h soot- �N 30 (/6000'� y V1 v� a� 680 . K v 9800•t N<89u Z_1 00 Cary// p 36 0 y1�lA- /60.0036 !H/60.00,h/`=s 74 JJ%o,.,y 9�3 67 T�0 3.2 ACSES f UPL.cIND , 1� S B)• ' it "4virA/ ��I 3210.00. - Q -346 o '\' , / TIDE- GZEAT MA>ia5</ES - `Z.�15SIh�•r,+, - S / fti o� •V SV$b/V/S/ON 7.7LA/J OF LAND/N BA eiVS'7-AZL6- MA as. AND L-Asr SANDW/CA/ MASS. OE-S/Gh/ED RO.2 PO//VT A,l/LL. zL-ALTY neusr =L-r/T/Or\/E2.9 ' BY C20WELL 4 TAY1-0.2 C0874 YAQ MOVTfJP07aT HA SS• .SCALE• /�/00' ..TULY /97/ �yt'at it WILFRED BARNSTABLE COUNTY .TRYLOfl REGISTRY OF DEEDS A TRUE COPY,ATTEST AApmvel of this plea 0 subject to compliance with oovenad to bs ,� . . \1JL raaordad borewllh. (�V��/,�,f••t�Ly" ��'-/_� __ _ JOHN F.MEADE REGISTER $•iC+LCL4ND SUH Y08 DATE APP•20VED �//O/]/ .. ,• DATE- Sr6NED C'K7,p 411077, .s �T /s•/T $,d2NSTAHLE 7�L4NN/NG SOALb - " O APP20Val- Nor 72E'4>L//86D I F/O WA12D N%:SE•A,2.5 CLEPR OF THE TON/N OF - 4L//vDE2 rW& 57Ve9D/V/5/0N BArlNSYaBUf•NE•8E6Y OE27IFy 774A7'7NE•-Or/C@- \ CON T20L LAW. OP APP20 VAL OP 7-1415 PLAN 6YTIIE SdBA1/S7-Za4E SANON/ICN PLA NNrNG BOAQD PLANNING SOA YZD/•/AS BbEN SE'C Er V&0 4ND \ �` /,/r x• /� RE0020ED 47•Te/15 OFFICE ANO TNgT NO APPEAL WAS .P_KE/VED DUgINO THE 7'N/ENTY DAYS NEXT APT--2 SUCI-/ .QE•CE/PT AND 3ZE- -00.20/NG OF SA/D NOT'CE. e� DATE- TOWN CL E•E.0