Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0293 LONG BEACH ROAD - Health
293 Long Beach Road Centerville A = 185 034 CYCL4p UPC 12534 No.2-153LOR HASTINGS. WN �tr �� Town of Barnstable Barn m ameNc3chy 39. ' Board of Health prfa ' 200.Main Street, Hyannis MA 02601 2007 Office: 508-8624644 Wayne Miller,M.D,. FAX: 508-790-6304 Paul Canniff,D.M.D. Junichi Sawayanagi May 28, 2013 Ms. Joyce Haseotes 293 Long Beach Road Centerville, MA RE Sampling of Wastewater Effluent from your Innovative/Alternat!Ve (FAST) System at 293 Long Beach Road;Centerville Dear Ms. Haseotes, You are granted permission to reduce the frequency of sampling and monitoring of the wastewater effluent from your onsite sewage disposal system consisting of innovative/alternative technology (FAST system) at 293 Long Beach Road, Centerville. A public hearing was held before the Board of Health on May 14, 2013. The Board has received the report of eight test results with an average Kjeldahl Nitrogen level of only 2.07, an average Nitrate-Nitrogen level of only 5.6 mg/liter, and an average Nitrite-Nitrogen level of 0.05 mg/liter (none detected in most cases). This permission is granted with the following conditions: • The wastewater effluent shall continue to be tested once per year during the month of July or August for BOD, pH, Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate-Nitrogen, and Nitrite Nitrogen. ❖ Operation and Maintenance Inspections shall be conducted on a regular basis in accordance with MA DEP Regulations. Since " ly; W e miler, M.D., Chairman Cc: Wastewater Treatment Services,Inc. Q:\WPFILES\H8eotesMonitoringReduction2Ol3.doe ��a r • 44 Commercial Street, Raynham, MA 02767 Q:\WPFILES\HaseotesMonitoringReduction2013.doc " , f , r 44.Commercial Street iy.hham;-MA 02767 { 'C)Xz: Tel:;,(5,08),880-0233 Fax: (508) 880-7232 April 10, 2013 Barnstable Board of Health 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Subject: Request for Testing Reduction FAST Treatment System 'Reference: Serial Number: 00005186 293 Long Beach Road, Centerville, MA Attached please find the results for testing performed at the property of Joyce Haseotes, 293 Long Beach Road, Centerville, MA. We are asking the Barnstable Board of Health to review the test data for that property to see if that testing may be reduced. Please forward a copy of your decision to our office. Your help in this matter would be greatly appreciated. k� -4 Sincerely, �--° Wastewater Treatment Services, Inc. `OFF Service Department Aa Cc: Joyce Haseotes emistry ��.� Environmental Services ent Anal 1Ca1 i �B Site Sampling i. J 1. ty Assurance Services i 1Ce Data Auditing C O R P O R A T 1 O N Moreau CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Wastewater Treatment Services,Inc. 44 Commercial Street REPORTED: 03/08/2011 Raynham, MA 02767 ORDER#: G1134514 COLLECTED BY: M.Dillen SAMPLE DATE: 2/28/2011 TIME: 10:00 . DATE RECEIVED: 3/1/2011 LOCATION: 293 Long Beach Rd. Centerville, MA SAMPLE ID: Grab (0000-5186) Haseotes DESCRIPTION: WATER RESULTS OF ANALYSIS z �{..�+�� -.n�,�.,ir•:•1.., .rr'.rt � :�.p.� yi t..:.,..ra s^.�'..Sy eir '>d,..•f ..� ...yti'�'.. �;�3-� �`f?5„�i 3{3- '.-.3 ..,! ��e. i+1u V..r.3,. ,. te:u4'�• ,�"'''%..._ - :, .:.y'S.,�S�1 :�: !c. nS e'Y.1-�£au.3. .y, y �G:ti�,. }.�,�.... 1 wt F::=:: `}'.�.�;..r:1,4 �., •,�.; �. - �?":.. ria.�i"4 �,,,,'bj�t -t... .�} r�i to n��.t�.w r ire V::`. r�kay,_ i �--�arameter�-,.� ��i,b$�, .� »,...� .�. .�g,���,� _ „y„�r., ��` ` ,��, , � �, .�'•1 � r{,��y�, Y�>r;� � `1 �.��'� -+� �.,�,7;Jt �ff,� .><� .a __, xi.� Anal. cal,: .>; -�4,,�'Datee .�� .� �7 is ,-}•��r� e �,bet:����, ,�tii -. , :.,���,,,.. . � E� . ..iT.a'*a.,.::�''cvt,-s,'`; c3 :py,^4' ��•" �.a�'.•;.dk..;r.;x .r nz,X,^ m t.,}: Y , ., Y l.su-''?y- rX:. „ nc�.a.ri.: '.:E r.f... Est .<.�i7 rr9 x. -. .. .h ,F�..•e >Z.��r f.Y.�-.r� C n..�T•�i�,i ., 4}3.'�� .,�s.3,3h�...,.�1.a�.e �V�§.•�}f!wY.�vf ik�r,•,, ,k'�' ym..�: F e.._s- a b�,a, 4� � ._.u,y i�iF is n.ye. '�.;S,€' .... "�2,"*a Y2,,. �' �15 j1: ! xFby„ n,�<�{ f� :�'`�.� �� k,��:�- �.�.+ .� �;:� .,Method , �,� :,.Anal ed,;.�. _.. rf=� �:„s � � �)✓'nniG:�,��' . � �Y :-:�' ���:r� � :�:� rs;�=�� � >y,�'R-y, .. �,(4-..<`�.,a. .p,A�y _�+;�,a.:yr.. S .�.:i�s, Syr.r-r• � s,r.. .. l..r:";'n�Mcrc,.s' d'�eg.��li. i� .t.'�'e _i.. r�.r '*!s,`FMa[...�• .. r4`'rf r....x,9�...y�'.c,t i'Y:..r;rr �,:�� e.4.�: � +:. r: .;.-a_ 'a,��..�11,rz5 '1��5"�r '�'�'��'�`�k�7�2 �s r'�`3 -� �� n�.,�_. .y.r. � �. d..,\..^*-?-•. "k�- ,.: �,5 s...,t..:h..- �,.4..,i7��.r a-i � ..Y�;.�t .»tia*, . t._:�' ry. 1:y1� y.*au4,�yt�V s�:r. •� .i..ea.f�i y-,fir„-;'.i3 rv'�"f I a:��'�rA i.,.,_v•§ .ri >$�`�.p� ., r.ti �`� ,:!.�,�..,y y A�""�sd 11 �-,.�n s .., ... e* tr ...�,.,# �,�a�i=hz'rT4" �£: a;� Fa ' � `x �� V� i"[f�!�w�v �+ �r•#y I`-Cy .,�,.�vk�15w7 .7�a :�.yY;.: 1`r'•�4�.�a?�,fi"4-'�,�.r:.��i�r�'S� � �sti-.:,�'rr�'a^ k�:� ,�`��4�ti;!I�td r�+ �,��.�±�ukwrysl, � �'� �u:o�.�t`t' -�psik�,,,�f,3ra�.w '� ��'r �, "i a'� 7�'�.�, +, "" .„a`�r � 'I I Test Parameters LAB-ID#: 1134514-01 BOD SM 5210B 03/02/2011 mg/L 4 <4.0 Kjeldahl,Nitrogen EPA 351.2 03/03/2011 mg/I; 0.50 0.57 Nitrate,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 03/01/2011 mg/L 0.50 16.7 Nitrite,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 03/01/2011 mg/L 0.25 ND pH SM 4500 H+B 03/01/2011 S.U. 0-14 6.6 Solids, Suspended SM 2540 D !7�03/04/2011 mg/L 4 <4.0 NA=Not Applicable ND=Not Detected <' = Less Than Approved By. *' = Detection Limit La�Maag,,�/ Date ' liI y I , I: li I: MAR 0 8 2011 � ` 4 By ..... Analytical Balance Corp., 422 West Grove Street, Middleboro, MA 02346 Ph: 508-946-2225 _ Page 1 of 1 try r��r�nrp Environmental Services sme!tZ�hemis Anal lcal B�L11LL Site Sampling ity Assurance Services Data Auditing � C O R P O R A T I O N Mike Moreau CERTIFICATE .OF ANALYSIS Wastewater Treatment Services,Inc. 44 Commercial Street REPORTED: 05/27/2011 Raynham, MA 02767 ORDER#: G1136617 COLLECTED BY: M. Dillen SAMPLE DATE: 5/18/2011 TIME: 9:15 DATE RECEIVED: 5/19/2011 LOCATION: 293 Long Beach Rd., Centerville,MA SAMPLE ID: Haseotes ... Haseotes DESCRIPTION: WATER RESULTS OF ANALYSIS le Test Parameters LAB-ID#• 1136617-01 BOD SM 5210B 05/20/2011 mg/L 4 <4.0 Kjeldahl,Nitrogen EPA 351.2 05/25/2011 mg/L 0.50 0.53 Nitrate,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 05/20/2011 mg/L 0.50 3.90 Nitrite,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 05/20/2011 mg/L 0.25 ND pH ISM 4500 H+B 05/20/2011 S.U. 1 0-14 7.4 Solids, Suspended ISM 2540 D 05/24/2011 mg/L 4 4.5 NA=Not Applicable ND=Not Detected <' Approved Less.Than - r % *' = Detection Limit �bm anag �/ D e i JUN 0 1 2011 r BYo..................... ag of 1 Analytical Balance Corp.,. 422 West Grove Street, Middleboro, MA 02346 Pb: 508-946-2225 a1 Chemistry Environmental Services essment r�1`�}� p Site Sampling ality Assurance Services An V� cal LlG4lantL Data Auditing C O R I P O R A T 1 O N r, Mike Moreau CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Wastewater Treatment Services, Inc. 44 Commercial Street REPORTED: 08/23/2011 Raynham, MA 02767 ORDER#: ' GI 139522 COLLECTED BY: M. Dillen SAMPLE DATE: 8/15/2011 TIME: 14:15 DATE RECEIVED: 8/16/2011 LOCATION: 293 Long Beach Centerville,MA SAMPLE ID: Haseotes Grab(5186) DESCRIPTION: WATER RESULTSry OF ANALYSIS E � 4 •� � is 3� I7aI � r ° ° ti'+-� � � ��. '.' � ,yU� Test Parameters Las-ID#: 1139522-01 BOD SM 5210B 08/17/2011 mg/L 4 5.1 Kjeldahl,Nitrogen EPA 351.2 08/19/2011 mg/L 0.50 1.88 Nitrate,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 08/16/2011 mg/L 0.50 4.83 Nitrite,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 08/16/2011 mg/L 0.25 ND pH SM 4500 H+B 08/16/2011 S.U. 0-14 7.4 Solids, Suspended SM 2540 D 08/16/2011 mg/L 4 6.5 NA=Not Applicable, ND=Not Detected Approved By: '<' = Less Than � i La anager Date *' = Detection Limit I atiyy..............eso.e • Page 1 of 1 Analytical Balance Corp., 422 Wesi Grove Street,'Middleboro, MA 02346 Ph: 508-946-2225 ironmental Chemistry Environmental Services it Assessment Balance AnalyticalSAA .I.CLI,1Ll.. . Site Sampling Quality Assurance Services Data Auditing G o RIP O R I 0 N Mike Moreau CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Wastewater Treatment Services,Inc. 44 Commercial Street REPORTED: 12/20/2011 Raynham, MA 02767 ORDER#: GI 143251 COLLECTED BY: M.Dillen SAMPLE DATE: 12/13/2011 TIME: 8:00 DATE RECEIVED: 12/13/2011 LOCATION: 293 Long Beach Rd. Centerville,MA SAMPLE ID: Haseotes Grab DESCRIPTION: WATER RESULTS OF ANALYSIS ��u€'�.n '�•�'�r�rv' Y • � .:.�•�� ��.. �5,� .� _�r3 r r -.„ N � .t�� ���n; i `t�"^tY"�.'�� ` � �'i�}l �,�y� �"��� gyp;';k.. +�a-�'ar�i e�,6'.�i, �L2�y�d .�,�, .,.,�„ �r'�`atrt�t'�r�r . �� � ",:�1�:' � ,��1Dat � �a -� ts � • , � �U.et i��� �3 l` r`� �R�esul�:•' � a 'F� � �. 9N r:� s°�� ,w r #'` t�•,• e G��..s'�" •;�lt �'M� Geri 7- ;� 0.�� x' i �� �'��I�v�i {� -s t y,p'6,,� ���� y-M 1 �•` 1 � } r.,5krc _ .r' rdke'1"fir'4[2 F `1''.i!.± 'k'�4 ti". _ r••7 .��<.Y _ _ { 4 _'y� hfi?r:� c'iari 'M 5 �5h3i'�"7 Test Parameters LAB-ID#: 1143251-01 BOD SM 5210B 12/14/2011 mg/L 4 <4.0 Kjeldahl,Nitrogen EPA 351.2 12/19/2011 mg/L 0.50 1.15 Nitrate,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 12/13/2011 mg/L 0.50 3.06 Nitrite,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 12/13/2011 mg/L 0.25 ND pH SM 4500 H+B 12/13/2011 S.U. 0-14 7.8 Solids, Suspended SM 2540 D 12/15/2011 mg/L 4 8.5 NA=Not Applicable ND=Not Detected x Approved By• '<' = Less Than La Manager Date Detection Limit r RECEIVED DEC 2 12011 Page 1 of 1 Analytical Balance Corp., 422 West Grove Street, Middleboro, MA 02346 Ph: 508-946-2225 emistry \\ Environmental Services - �rrne`�nt ,, Site Sampling ices Anal Kcal �� 8alance Data Auditing G O R P O R A T I O N -= yNlike Moreau CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Wastewater Treatment Services, Inc. 44 Commercial Street REPORTED: 02/29/2012 Raynham, MA 02767 ORDER#: G1244674 COLLECTED BY: M. Dillen SAMPLE DATE: 2/15/2012 TIME: 10:00 DATE RECEIVED: 2/17/2012 LOCATION: 293 Long Beach, Centerville,MA SAMPLE ID: Haseotes - Grab (0000-5186) DESCRIPTION: WATER RESULTS OF ANALYSIS cr��f:e �r�.�,�r�x y�'�,,-�,;. a•. ,�:a 1 f-3��'g`�.. ��7 :�_I 2�"1 .aka`is :1 tir zo11�;,:�F r,,'" a.crL .� . ,�l �` 4.'yy y� _:F� r.A -4.:1!��.� '+ t I� 'F{ lt: s-T�s :: .u� 7�M }t�i�1 f:� .y �1�-�i'+�t ,Cf...�\4j�'U � � 4 '1+��4I}f -`tDate 4�:Tf , Y,YKU t5 •.��4 �i 3e:: 1 i �et,L ��41`� �1 � �.re-.� � }�eSlllt' FZ 7�r t: 5. ;�� ^��.� ,����-7c,c��s'.4r za�..6.. " fix vy'�"�.. x, h ua.-a;✓��1�.1 kt'?_ + h�F' a s a�i 1p.-.�.�s 7^ *r 4 ki -� r � cr tr13. 'I�::.L.�!y�5� S.n-..h>i } tz,•x'{" rw..�y r.n.,�,f :.��eth�d:.:,. .l: dal j�zecl �:s:_��9a 1�z� Ljmt i '"+'Jai' 7 tiei �. - k � �f n X : L�� �Id§:A� .m''::a +f 'i. �'aa�'I+:.��Fp-fLP �... a �-�s�c.�h 4�.�^.^ ,Y 4,��f "�i�a„.�91T�n;.[y er ...��� f Y.T:�' dY 1.,5'l '! ry�.-t al a.�a �� :u�i-4}ry*.q i'fi rec• .re 4j-r rl F' -. 1,Pe '..� Y ��: �t �r'k i`,y Y. � `t7^-1%4yl(•A ..iLavSUi} Pt-w �,�.. {.� u+z l�. d s4FkP�a_J�h l,hd! �:. i f r ¢`5 Sr 'r J!- t L�'71',; �,a veer�.rs r'nY r�y'4.!+'', �'ai �:a ���. Nest Parameters LAB-M 1244674-01 f BOD SM 5210B 02/17/2012 mg/L 4 <4.0 Kjeldahl,Nitrogen EPA 351.2 02/29/2012 mg/L 0.50 1.07 Nitrate,Nitrogen 41 l OB SM 4110 B 02/17/2012 mg/L 0.50 5.20 Nitrite,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 02/17/2012 mg/L 0.25 ND pH SM 4500 H+B 02/17/2012 S.U. 0-14 _ 7.7 Solids, Suspended. SM 2540 D 02/21/2012 mg/L 4 <4.0 NA=Not Applicable ND=Not Detected Approved By: � '<' = Less Than *' La= Detection Limit Manager / Date DECEIVED MAR 0 5 2012 Page 1 of I Analytical Balance Corp.,, 422 West Grove Street, Middleboro, MA 02346 Ph: 508-946-2225 al Chemistry Environmental Services r ssment �n�l ���� E �� rp Site Sampling 11 t li ty Assurance Services Data Auditing i C O R P O R A T 1 O N p" MikeiMoreau Data OF ANALYSIS Wastewater Treatment Services, Inc. 44 Commercial Street REPORTED: 06/06/2012 Raynham, MA 02767 ORDER# G1247358 COLLECTED BY: M.Dillen SAMPLE DATE: 5/29/2012 TIME: 9:45 DATE RECEIVED: 5/31/2012 LOCATION: 293 Long Beach Rd. Centerville,MA SAMPLE ID: Haseotes . (Grab) DESCRIPTION: WATER �t,hy ¢J _ RESULTS OF ANALYSIS aPh iff` yl'rM', .'=K'v�. h� .S,.tf ...,.. ' i^ ° ,m;. 74,` ,'` "., aI''v}r."7s'� ,': r , ?yaul, ...{M ,k5 'x''1=' ": Fsi,.'rus`4 zi x r.rTr {fl ,"�"t�Alk neter' �'�" � $ t ,�� , F-. n� ^!rsr � �J. �� �r"'y s }'4���3•a,.''Ana�1 >=h,' r� '� .�.r-- _ �--"��f�, •� �! � -'3v �.r•r a,.�� s..� ,.. �h' .'` � et#r '�'rt.4�+,�;;,���y.. u, :� ��1 �Sl.F��" {i a +r«�'. 4 ..4 -m. i, r ', i� ,a}� 1" {� - � -: }r s,�b � . . 3*�i •� �xi"�' a � ��n�x = nfi oA C W' E"hir66 •sw� �� Test Parameters LAB-ID#: 1247358-01 I f BOD SM 5210B 05/31/2012 In. 4 9.9 Kjeldahl,Nitrogen EPA 351.2 06/05/2012 mg/L 0.50 9.70 �I Nitrate,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 05/31/2012 mg/L 0.50 3.88 li Nitrite,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 05/31/2012 mg/L 0.25 ND I` pH SM 4500 H+B 05/31/2012 S.U. 0-14 7,4 Solids, Suspended ISM 2540 D 06/O1/2012 mg/L 4 4.5 P NA=Not Applicable ND=Not Detected j <' = Less Than Approved By: *' = Detection Limit Lab M ager f VDate i i RECEIVED JIfN 8 �1 I! i. i, Analytical Balance Corp., 422 West Grove Street, Middleboro, MA 02346 Ph: 508-946-2225 Page 1 of 1 Ij j� emistry Environmental Services nt F �'] Site Sampling ssurance Services Analyt�Cal �f' SJ({Af 411Ce Data Auditing C1 O F P O R A T I O N ike Moreau CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 'Wastewater Treatment Services, Inc. 44 Commercial Street REPORTED: 08/22/2012 Raynham, MA 02767 ORDER#: G1249937 COLLECTED BY: M.Dillen SAMPLE DATE: 8/13/2012 TUAE: 9:00 DATE RECEIVED: 8/15/2012 LOCATION: 293 Long Beach Centerville, MA SAMPLE ID: Haseotes Grab(0000-5186) DESCRIPTION: WATER RESULTS OF ANALYSIS b yb'S''t1 W a� hESnal cal rDate �x+ ,�ZTt1t y +i rDet rE{ Result;.f t - :°a�-�»4 �5'Cs,'.,.� �.1J�, € 4; .;Sf'wnrrf p ��,.:.,.£ ..':,;�`,}�,..,� 13§t Y..:::. � 'wf 7'7 T,m� s*$.q`� �,vt ,.-. �k, f;,i�s'�t+rC°..�..,;t*. �.t•ru'S7�µ���1�:- ::�4"'S s.u�:'1,.�x:s: ..-;''��• yv�.f.,: �k'�x'.�i. �1 - 1 �.lF:� c� �1 : etho�l:�.r• .��ial�zed"�'�'.a;-�.;;����r`' ,,,� ,. � Lamt�' ,� E . : M f `� ' 5:r -.-.�.�.. k3-.,�:-�.zt._:��s:..>..:<,r..,, v.t_:h_r.� r-.�._l+_ .....r,S - _�,. +:,. �.,Sz,�'2'�.yi= 6 ..;�5.: _�.la$-ti1� ,.r>.-z:E�a.Y';�w .}s .1�y.�M._ + k�tt+' 4rf�,.'1:�.�. ..-4>r�... .KJ•,�.t..'h.,: Nest Parameters LAB-1D#: 1249937-01 BOD SM 5210B 08/15/2012 I mg/L 4 <4.0 Kjeldahl,Nitrogen' IEPA 351.2 08/21/2012 mg/L 0.50 1.15 Nitrate,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 08/15/2012 mg/L 0.50 3.08 Nitrite,Nitrogen 4110E SM 4110 B i 03/15/2012 mg/, � 0.25 i 0.40 IpH SM 4500 H+B 08/15/2012 S.U. 0-14 7.3 j Solids, Suspended SM 2540 D 08/16/2012 ` meL 4 <4.0 NA=Not Applicable ND=Not Detected Approved By: '<' = Less Than Lab anager ate *' = Detection Limit _ i Page 1 of 1 Analytical Balance Corp., 422 West Grove Street, Middleboro, MA 02346 Ph: 508-946-2225 __ I Environmental Services Site Sampling A� ssurance Services Anal lcal6' ,?BalanceData Auditing G O R P O R ... A T I O N Moreau CERTIFICATE OF,ANALYSIS Wastewater Treatment Services, Inc. 44 Commercial Street REPORTED: 11/30/2012 Raynham, MA 02767 ORDER#: G1252911 COLLECTED BY: M. Dillen SAMPLE DATE: 11/19/2012 TIME: 8:45 DATE RECEIVED: 11/20/2012 LOCATION: 293 Long Beach Rd. Centerville,MA SAMPLE ID: Haseotes Grab (0000-5186) DESCRIPTION: WATER RESULTS OF ANALYSIS ,k 3.... ':�Y.� u"rfr7 i sy w:z n- aaw-: t Pr'r a«s.ar a•<z. !".•y 1 k �'i .-k.. i�x:.. s .: ,..� ;-}S;;_: �,�...fis���:�p? r� ". -s ✓+^'.. £'�..uXra t.'E I�i S r,:.:., 'ah :^s.k �,a :�',- :• k...::t34 �,t��-'.ar r u,_:- `f, r'-a-.-.i E.. ...-- s. u.,�y::. i � .c.;: x ra 1-•�:-1- n. � -. I.,�. - ,.s.�5 a E r =- - aV 4 Pd.,.�. '3�.. ,�, s~ a— a. 'i.�:lav ..:�'�;'� rr:,�: ra �`:�.•: W h.a_a x fi"�_ k..::s°a 7� ..�d':•. �t ea°,�a i�, ,a .,:,,,r.W.r' � c �`r„ N L:.,.z r a,r �,�:.,.:: r.�, '�`a f:. A� ..�.ri=. - ,..,. �„rr�. �a� �'i''"e�d°"�•. �,. sx. .�' '� .�'n ti,„��'�'R�nfi' .....Fr� .ti, fi��sl� .�:' ,�^:`�u:�,�� i+},. 3��, yk'��:re+z`��'z��.�;'� •i;.,:a^I.t�}3".d}a,.;?"3.;rw �'.�. -.�� :�.a� �v.ia'• ._,r. "Y`atT-,. L ,r:;:,n Er.a.�:� � _....--5w'3 .+t.,,,.s a �x( �a ar I I.. y,, .w _..4 F a na,4. i- k ..,;i .�pp-S•�.. 3a 7 ,:.r x�i'.�ap, t„ s ! .,..: .,.- ��hqa,a..:; f'�i ,�'4:. �'S -..,l.,,� a znG � h Ft.r.�LF '"".;��cl�M tt.�,�'.Fat?:Ir,rah. Test Parameters LAB-ID#: 1252911-01 BOD ' SM 5210B 11/21/2012 mg/L 4 <4.0 Kjeldahl,Nitrogen, EPA 351.2 11/29/2012 mg/L 0.50 0.53 Nitrate,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B 11/20/2012 mg/L 0.50 4.15 Nitrite,Nitrogen 4110B SM 4110 B, : 11/201/2012 mg/L 0.25 ND pH • SM 4500 H+B 11/20/2012 S.U. 0-14 7.7 Solids, Suspended ISM 2540 D 11/21/2012 mg/L 4 <4.0 NA=Not Applicable r ND=Not Detected Approved, <' = Less Than FabMana r / Date *' = Detection Limit i RECEIVE Q 4 ~ Page 1 of 1 1 Analytical Balance Corp., 422 West Grove Street, Middleboro,'MA 02346 Ph: 508-946-2225 I 44 Commercial Street Raynham, MA 02767 a Tel: (508) 880-0233 Fax: (508) 880-7232 June 11, 2010 Barnstable Board of Health 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 . Attention: Board of Health Agent Reference: Home FAST Treatment Serial Number: 00005186 Attached please find a copy of the Product Registration Report for the FAST Treatment\ System_for e startup performed on 05/20/2010 at the home of Joyce Haseotes located at - th�: [293 Long Beach Road, Centerville,MA: Also, attached is a copy of the fully executed Inspection&Testing Agreement. If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Donna L. Callahan Enclosures 1NG0R�P0RATEb 8450 Cole Parkway Tu Shawnee, KS 66227 to Phone 913-422-0707 w Fax: 912-422-0808 e-mail: onsite .biomicrobics.com m www.biomicrobics.com a 800-753-FAST(3278) PRODUCT REGISTRATION REPORT Product Registration Report must be completed and returned to Bio-Microbics, Inc. in order to effect warranty. Date of Start-UpA Date Shipped to End User 3/3/10 Serial # 00005186 OWNER NAME Joyce Haseotes ADDRESS 293 Long Beach Road CITY/STATE/ZIP Centerville, MA 02632 PHONE/FAX BIO-MICROBICS DISTRIBUTOR NAME Wastewater Treatment Services,Inc. ADDRESS 44 Commercial Street CITY/STATE/ZIP Raynham, MA 02767 PHONE/FAX 508-880-0233 FAX: 508-880-7232 INSTALLER NAME Pastore Excavating ADDRESS P.O. Box 1289 CITY/STATE/ZIP Forestdale,MA 02644 PHONE/FAX 508-428-9300 CONSULTING ENGINEER if applicable) NAME PMP Associates ADDRESS 200 North Redford Street CITY/STATE/ZIP East Bridgewater,MA 02333 PHONE/FAX 508-378-3421 Go d Bad NA Good Bad NA ELECTRICAL PANEL(S) TREATMENT UNITS) ; Visual Alarm Operating Air vent clear ❑ Audio Alarm Operating Septic tank level BLOWER(S) Septic tank meets min. size ❑ Wired for correct voltage [� Septic tank filled to ❑ operating level Inlet/outlet piped correctly Air Lift Operation ❑ Filter element installed ❑ Recirculation tube in place ( ❑ Blower hood secure ❑ Fasteners tight L`J Blower works correctly [� ❑ WATER-TIGHT JOINTS Blower located within 100'of (J ❑ ❑ Treatment unit to septic tank ❑ treatment unit Air line clear ❑ Entrance tube to insert cover ❑ ❑ Air inlet screen clear ❑ Insert to insert cover ❑ Blower hood vents clear ❑ Discharge line connection Factory Authorized Personnel: Title: Firm: Wastewater Treatment Services, Inc. Date: 4 7 i 44 Commercial Street Please complete all items marked Raynham, MA including three signatures. Mail 02767 signed original contract to: Wastewater Treatment Services Inc. 44 Commercial Street Tel: (508) 880-0233 Rav lam.MA 02767 Fax: (508) 880-7232 INSPECTION AND EFFLUENT TESTING AGREEMENT Agreement entered into by and between Wastewater Treatment Services,Inc. (herein called WTS)and the FAST'System OWNER(herein called OWNER) for the inspection by WTS of certain equipment of OWNER which is described below. T Tiv,n- ^�,.2f, r _ ? se -es ?oftC + tw T v r,l�t l co TTC � ! 1 1 ( } l " v Equipment will be inspected at le st 4 times per year that this Agreement remains in effect, with the first inspections beginning These inspections will include: 1) Testing of the sludge depth in the septic tank. 2) Take amperage and voltage readings, change oil, grease blower, check belts, check air pressure, air scour unit, check airlift, check recycle line, and clean/replace intake filter of air blower. 3) Inspection of the alarm system. 4) Inspect over-all condition of Modular FAST®System. 5) Notify OWNER of any problems encountered. ' 6) Service other.than.routine maintenance will be billed at an hourly rate,plus travel and parts. WTS shall notify the local Board of Health and Department of Environmental Protection in writing within 24 hours of a system failure or alarm event including corrective measures that have been taken. OWNER will be billed standard WTS charges for any parts used in repairs or maintenance. Any additional labor time will be billed to the OWNER at our current labor rates of$78.00 per hour. Emergency service between regular inspections will be provided at standard labor rates during normal business hours; at time and one-half after 5:00 PM and on Saturdays; and at double time on Sundays and holidays. Emergency service charges will include a minimum four(4)hours of labor, plus standard WTS charges for parts,plus mileage and tavel charges. The ami ual Cite inc'i !ales routine rnaintenaiiCe, but does not include repairs required for damages caused by abuse, accident, theft, acts of third persons, forces of nature, or alterations made to the equipment. WTS shall not be responsible for failure to render the agreed services if caused by strikes,labor disputes, non-cooperation by OWNER, or other factors beyond the control of WTS. OWNER understands and agrees that WTS is not responsible for special, incidental or consequential damages, including but not limited to loss of time, injury to person or property, or equipment failure. OWNER agrees that WTS may enter OWNER's property and have acceptable access to all areas deemed by WTS to be necessary or appropriate for WTS to perform its duties hereunder. Current WTS practice is to send OWNER approximately 10 days before expiration of the term of the current contract an invoice for one year of service. It is OWNER's responsibility to timely return the payment. WTS must receive the payment before expiration of the current contract year to assure continuous contract coverage. Failure to return payment may result in suspension of service, cancellation of the contract and/or nullification of warranties, at the election of WTS. OWNER may not assign this contract without the prior written consent of WTS. It will remain in force until a party cancels by written notice to the other at the address given herein. MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. LOCATION ANNUAL RATE Bio Microbics ModularFAST D00 J-1 6 Centerville, MA $500.00 EQUIPMENT OWNER Wastewater Treatment Services,Inc *Signed by OWNER. Signed: Joyce Haseotes 44 Com ial Street *Address: Raynham, MA 02767 293 Long Beach Road Tele: (508) 880-0233 *City: State: Zip: Fax: (508) 880-7232 Centerville MA 02632 *Telephone 508-1- 9 Effective Date of Agreement 9 r Daytime Telephone 771-l4, OWNER understands that(1)ANNUAL RATE payment is for one year only commencing on the date set forth above and is non-refundable, and(2)Current DEP Regulations require OWNER to maintain a service agreement for the life of the FAST`*System. I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE FOREGOING. *Signed by OWNER.- Effluent Testing Effluent sample taken 4 times per year and delivered to a qualified testing lab for evaluation. Results sent to State and local Agencies as well as the OWNER. OWNER is responsible for providing acceptable access to effluent to enable a grab sample to be taken for laboratory testing performed. PE RINIIT: *(PLEASE CHECK ONE) (X) GENERAL ( ) REMEDIAL O PROVISIONAL *SPECIAL CONDITIONS PER LOCAL BOARD OF HEALTH (Y)or(N) if YES, please attach copy of permit ( X )pH,BOD;, TSS,Nitrate,Nitrite,TKN ( ) Other: *Cost for testing: $265.00/Visit Operator assigned: William Everett Telephone: (508) 400-3868 *Engineer: PMP Associates *Approval for Effluent Testing Owner's Signature A:I.MA-INSP 1,.rpd No. �O J 21 2• Fee THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Entered in computer: +� Yes PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION -TOWN OF BARNSTABLEa MASSACHUSETTS Z.ppfication for Migpozat *potem Conotruction Permit Application for a Permit to Construct( )Repair( )Upgrade(/Abandon( ) ❑Complete System O Individual Components Location Address or Lot No.&`tJ \oV Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. ppfy Assessor's Map/Parcel aq3 LhJ 6F ��0� � q 5bB- 3�� b Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No. �r9 1 �'. �Ai.wl, YI'lLl" �(0�'�'l //y� ���J...////`l /`/0. �j�/���yr�1J')l.�/�1�eT `J/vyv��s�J��a�J�al Type of Building:?A\s��: C.XG v i1 U t� "�'� 3�v Dwelling No.of Bedrooms Lot Size A21 Tr q.ft. Garbage Grinder( ) Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow & gallons per day. Calculated daily flow gallons. Plan Date D Number of sheets _Revision Date I 1V09 Title Size of Septic Tank ADOD ai9 Type of S.A.S. 4 E- q I&l(;wim Description of Soil g _ rD —� 1 L Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) Date last inspected: Agreement: The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title of the ironme a and not t e the %rm—i—n o eration until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has been issued b this ` ar eal Signed e Date 30 Application Approved by Date 3© tT Application Disapproved for the fo wing reasons Permit No. 2 D®a 3 2 1 Date Issued 9 130 � -7N ��yy 1i .:�...� ,�•—�Wirtz. Fee, 4 e,. fi"- Entered in computer:@ ' Y ` THE;COII MONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Yes w PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION -TOWN OF BARNSTABLE; MASSACHUSETTS p 1, � . Application for igogaYpgtentMogtructiott Permit Application for a Permit to Construct( )Repair( )Upgrade(/Abandon( ) O Complete System ❑Individual Components Location Address or Lot No.&q3 LjO& 61;0C H I (W.D Owners Naatttre,Addresss d Tel.No.l Assessor's Map/Parcel �5 /�3 �3� C -1 JI(.,� 6rAC r I KD Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No. . _.. -�,,.�,.��� :- r�' .tom I�`1.�'. (�-SS�G• � LLC.. �'�'���'- 3�t�J �00 00, 6GO Ott Q 51 C Type of Building: TErQ.L I`�CP V_��Lot f0? C/ol?7 — 3 ODwelling No.of Bedrooms Size .4D W? q.ft. Garbage Grinder( ) Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow ' LO(Po gallons per day. Calculated daily flow IS r gallons. Plan Date Number of sheets Revision Date Y T ; �! Title ! Size of Septic Tank 400o li tq L Type of S.A.S. // S O F' !? 6XA 604 1DPILT!?drOeS Description of Soil; T Cgi aulz.. 0) ROM., z� rlei H- �aC ;t/ ro . --il 3T-PrFri Fi Fj) Fly' r_ r,. _tv C041es 1�. f) e ( 42as e Sl l)o o . C.r-f'"-y , V rieyi eu y (�(-/c1es t _ Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) /e�i�!�1f' .. EXI-?!fj(,G S aTFJ41, v I,;-,(� Date last inspected: Agreement: _ The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Tit] of the EfivironmenrtaLCode and not t "Tace the system" o eration until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has been issued y this% rd t ate W09 .Signed D Application Approved by w--- s Date 36 0 -Application Disapproved for the fo wing reasons E Permit No. 2 O 4g" 321 Date Issued 9130 !� THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ' BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS s Certificate of Compliance . - THIS•IS TO CERTIFY,that the On-site Sewage Dis osal System Constructed( )Repaired( )Upgraded(� Abandoned( )by �-- t� r i -� 't M"T- /LF-- 1C X CKI0X-l'7v--J TkJ C. at AG3 16 0 Ci- P�_O'C H go M) LoTr,)V i o.t � has been constructed in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 and the for Disposal System Construction Permit No..2049-3 Z( dated q" 30— 700 CA Installer P --6t-f *P L -S-i`5k, -)I U/3Designer ®m p- n 5,�oC i 4il_5 L L C, The issuance of this ermi shall t be construed as a guarantee that thf-sy�w'll -u c`dn as designed.r Date �a �� Inspector No. --------------------------Fee THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION - BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS Zi5pogal *pgtem Congtruction Permit Permission is hereby granted to Construct( )Repair( )Upgrade( )Abandon( ) System located at � ,.3 LO AA, 6�,Oc R®i:�Q , C,&)_r1:EtZy f LLIl v and as described in the above Application for Disposal System Construction Permit. The applicant recognizes his/her duty to comply with Title 5 and the following local provisions or special conditions. Provided:Construction must becompletedwithin three years of the date of this /pzrmit. J Date: k 197- 30 2 G O/ Approved by �t�------ �� � r �T' ' l�VC1'd'�'.`f'1�1�/` �J/`E'C�if72e/Zf ���'�►(.CP.6i,��GG. 44 Commercial Street Please complete all items marked• Raynham, MA including three signatures. Mai'. 02767 signed original contract to: Wastewater Treatment Services Inc. 44 Commercial Street Tel: (508) 880-0233 Ravnham,MA 02767 Fax: (508) 880-7232 INSPECTION AND EFFLUENT TESTING AGREEMENT Agreement entered into by and between Wastewater Treatment Services,Inc. (herein called WTS)and the FAST®System OWNER(herein called OWNER) for-the inspection by WTS of certain equipment of OWNER which is described below. U11(~ acceptance of tll.is ag,-eerrent at WTS's office.,WTS will render the following services oily: Equipment will be inspected at least 4 times per year that this Agreement remains in effect,with the first inspections begirring These inspections will include: 1) Testing of the sludge depth in the septic tank. 2) Take amperage and voltage readings, change oil, grease blower, check belts, check air pressure, air scour unit, check airlift, check recycle line, and clean/replace intake filter of air blower. 3) Inspection of the alarm system. 4) Inspect over-all condition of Modular FAST®System. 5) Notify OWNER of any problems encountered. 6) Service other than routine maintenance will be billed at an hourly rate,plus travel and parts. WTS shall notify the local Board of Health and Department of Environmental Protection in writing within 24 hours of a system failure or alarm event including corrective measures that have been taken. OWNER will be billed standard WTS charges for any parts used in repairs or maintenance. Any additional labor time will be billed to the OWNER at our current labor rates of$78.00 per hour. Emergency service between regular inspections will be provided at standard labor rates during normal business hours; at time and one-half after 5:00 PM and on Saturdays; and at double time on Sundays and holidays. Emergency service charges will include a minimum four(4)hours of labor, plus standard WTS charges for parts,plus mileage and travel charges. 'lie annual r.tte includes routine maintenance, but does not include repairs required for damages caused by abuse, accident, theft, acts of third persons, forces of nature,or alterations made to the equipment. WTS shall not be responsible for failure to render the agreed services if caused by strikes,labor disputes,non-cooperation by OWNER,or other factors beyond the control of WTS. OWNER understands and agrees that WTS is not responsible for special,incidental or consequential damages, including but not limited to loss of time, injury to person or property, or equipment failure. OWNER agrees that WTS may enter OWNER's property and have acceptable access to all areas deemed by WTS to be necessary or appropriate for WTS to perform its duties hereunder. Current WTS practice is to send OWNER approximately 10 days before expiration of the term of the current contract an invoice for one year of service. It is OWNER's responsibility to timely return the payment. WTS must receive the payment before expiration of the current contract year to assure continuous contract coverage. Failure to return payment may result in suspension of service, cancellation of the contract and/or nullification of warranties, at the election of WTS. OWNER may not assign this contract without the prior written consent of WTS. It will remain in force until a party cancels by written notice to the other at the address given herein. MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. LOCATION ANNUAL RATE Bio Microbics ModularFAST Centerville,MA $500.00 EQUIPMENT OWNER Wastewater Treatment Services,Inc *Signed by OWNER. Signed:_ Joyce Haseotes 44 Commercial Street *Address: Raynham, MA 02767 293 Long Beach Road Tele: (508) 880-0233 *City: State: Zip: Fax: (508) 880-7232 Centerville MA 02632 *Telephone 508-737-2267 Effective Date of Agreement Daytime Telephone OWNER understands that(1)ANNUAL RATE payment is for one year only commencing on the date set forth above and is non-refundable; and (2) Current DEP Regulations require OWNER to maintain a .service agreement for the life of the FAST®System. I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE FOREGOING. *Signed by OWNER: Effluent Testing Effluent sample taken 4 times per year and delivered to a qualified testing lab for evaluation. Results sent to State and local Agencies as well as the OWNER. OWNER is responsible for providing acceptable access to effluent to enable a grab sample to be taken for laboratory testing performed. P tn' p rY g PERIyHT: *(PLEASE CHECK ONE) (X) GENERAL ( ) REMEDIAL O PROVISIONAL *SPECIAL CONDITIONS PER LOCAL BOARD OF HEALTH (Y) or(N) if YES,please attach copy of permit ( X )pH,BOD5, TSS,Nitrate,Nitrite, TKN O Other: *Cost for testing: $265.00/Visit Operator assigned: William Everett Telephone: (508)400-3868 *Engineer: PMP Associates *Approval for Effluent Testing Owner's Signature A:\MA-[NSP_2—pd - - aLfje(UmmonWeaffli of JftmjJ)u� _ C (INSTRUCTIONS USE REVERSE;SIDE) ``�r10� P 1`� �7 09-25i-2f309, 11 -_oo FOR USE BY STANDARD CERTIFICATE OF DEATH BARN[ TAB LANI3 GOU T REGISTRY PHYMIANS AND REGISTRY OF VITAL RECORDS AND STATISTICS REGISTERED NUMBER STATE USE ONLY MEDICAL EXAMINERS DECEDENT-NAME FIRST MIDDLE LAST SEX DATE OF DEATH(Mo.,Day,Yr.) . STATE USE , ron Fr e M e 3 M 200 ONLY PLACE Of DEATHCOUNTY OF DEATH HOSPITAL OR OTHER INSTtTUiION•Name I.nor,in ,give street°ry number) 4a 46 Banta e k Cane Cod Hos ital PLACE OF DEATH(Check oMy oneJ: bsP HOSPITAL' OTHER 7 _ WAS D T HISPANIC ORIGIN? RACE(¢g.WiaTe,Black American Indian,at.) DECEDENT'S EDUCATION hest Grade 5 Type OlJam SpecAl, Puerto do Rican.!)ortrirrican,Cuban,efGl (Spe-AW t 9 completed) • . ($NO❑YES Elementary Sec(a,2) College fl4 5t) ea Specitr, III) White a 12 AGE-Last Birthday UNDE 1 YEA NOER 1 if Providence Rhode Island .MARRIED,NEVER MARRIED LAST SPOUSE(it wr7e,give maiden name) USUAL OCCUPATION WI KIND OF BUSINESS OR INDUSTRY WIDOWED OR DIVORCED (Ppor-NRetiredl 10 Age ,2 Married 13. Jo ce E. Geor a 14a i4b e d Farms RESIDENCE-NO.d ST.,Cf1YITOWN,COUNTY,STATE(COUNTRy ZIP CODE ' ,Sa 293 Lon . Beach Road Barnstable Barnstable Massachusetts 15b FATHER-FULL NAME STATE OF BIRTH(d not In US, MOTHER-NAME (GIVEN) (AfA1Df3y) STATE OF BIRTH(I1 not In the U8, 16 Rea(d _ name Country) name mradryl 16 a 17 Gr ace is Aphrodite Bassis ,e Greece ,6 out if • INFORMANT'S NAME MAILING ADDRESS-NO.S ST..CITYFTOWN,STATE,ZIP CODE RELATIONSHIP - 20 ce E 11 seotes 21 122 e 23 METHOD OF IMMEDIATE DISPOSITION FUNERAL SERVICE 02632 LICENSEE ORERDESIGNEE LICENSE• BURIAL ❑CREMATION 29 Dlap ENTOMBMENT ❑REMOVAL FROM STATE 20 an H. Edwards 50263 110NA710N ❑OTH.SPEC. 2 • -• • PLACE OF DISPOSITION(Name al Cemetery,Cram or When) LOCATION(CIIy?a.n,State) 26a Beeches-od CemetefNA�MEAND 29bBarnstable,3132 Autop DATE OF DISPOSITION ADDRESS OF FACILITY OR OTHER DESIGNEE 27 Yr. a Beal & Ames 160 W. Main St. 11 annis MA 02601 29 PART I-Enter the diseases,44udes,or complicaCons that Caused Mo death.Do not use o*the mode of dyirp,such aseaNutc or respiratory arrest ahock or head Nature 34 Manner Ust a*one cause an each fine(a through d1 PRINT OR TYPE LEGIBLY. BeNreen ante In e Death wa IMMEDIATE CAUSE(Final . disease or onnote n reen' aPneumonia in deamJ�,�� DUE TO tOA AS A CONSEOutNCE DFT 35C Work IM. �� Sequentially fist sordalons,11 b. - arty,leading to Immediate DUE TO(GR AS ACONSE rENCE Cr7 cause.Enter UNDERLYING CAUSE(disease 0,Injury that c. Initiated events resulting in DUE TO MR AS CQVSEOLMWZ OF7 351 Plan. decal)LAST d. PART II-Other significant conditions contributing to death but not resulting in underlying cause given in Pan 1. WAS AUTOPSY WERE ALrrOPSY FINDINGS U-37 Cod - PERFORMED? AVAILABLE PRIOR TO (Yes or Not COMPLETION OF CAUSE OF DEATH?(Ye°or Na) 30 e ter Disease Diabetes 31 32 1 From MED,F�(AM. MANNE OFfEATH DATE OF INJURY TIME OF INJURY INJURY AT WORK NOTIFIED? NATURAL �„J HOMICIDE❑COULD NOT BE 7Ehamo. (Ma,Day,Yr.) (Yes or No) (Yes or No) 33 a ACCIDENT❑SUICIDE ❑PENDING INVEST 35a 356 M 35c DESCRIBE HOW INJURY OCCURRED - PLACE OF INJ (Na 6 SL,clty/TPI,Ty stare) Pronouncement of Death LOCATIONForm(R-302)on File:❑ Br"''61eSt 1ac • afc,l SPeanly 35d 35o 35f 36a To the bast of my knowl ta amrretl et the time,dale,end place and due to the 37¢On the basis W examinauon arWar Imestl tlon In�O caw staled. s,p: - 9a Coy OplNan death occurred at the Ume, . H (Signature - oq W data,end plaza and du•to the eazee(a)elated ro and Title �� 9 g ISfonafure E o i DATE SIGNED(Mo_Day, HOUR OF DEATH n > and Tlde /y} [� 8! DATE SIGNED(Ma,Day,Yr. O 5( / 36c 00 a O ) HOUR OF DEATH i c F NAME OF ATTENDING PHYSICIAN IF NOT CERTIFIER M 3 37b 37C M o¢ .B� PRONOUNCED DEAD(Mo.,Day,Yr.) PRONOUNCED DEAD(Hr) al Mackenzie 36d 37d NAME AND ADDRESS OF CERTIFYING PHYSICIAN OR MEDICAL EXAMINER(Typ• P_Q 37e M � J"v4S(p G LICENSE No CERTIFIER SHARi �kScHEta 2 c�? 7A1-k- 'Sf4-. e_t- 1uArrr AA WAS THERE A IF YES,DATE IF YES,11ME 40d NAME OF PRONOUNCER 39 PERMANENT PRONOUNCEMENT FORM?PRONOUNCED PRONGING TITS BLACK INK ONLY (resarnm) 4 ❑RN. P.A.❑ ❑N:P. 4De R�01 OB DATE BUR IA PERMIT S LIED RECEIVED IN E CRY )G ?QWN F DATE OF,RE)CORD 'L ! ® 4 Etr3 , cLE nSLa m1�T 2 BIG �] , 43 C.SU G is I;the undersigned,hereby certify that I am the Town Clerk for the Town of Barnstable that,as such,I have custody of the records of births,marriages and deaths,required by law to be kept in my office;and I do hereby ceitify that the above is a true copy from said records. WITNESS:My hand and the SEAL OF THE TOWN OF BARYSTABI.E A TRUE COPY ATTEST:at Barnstable,Massachusetts r1 �//(/��/ • I Linda Hutchenrider,Town Clerk,Barnstable .(If the Seal is not raised,this document has been illegally copied-do npt accept it.) Doc:1. s 124 r 372 09-25-2009 11 :t7D BARNSTABLE LAND COURT REGISTRY DEED RESTRICTION WHEREAS,Joyce E. Haseotes (the"Grantor")is the owner of the property known as and numbered 293 Long Beach Road, Centerville,Barnstable County, Massachusetts, as is more particularly described in Certificate of Title No. 58363 filed with the Barnstable County Registry District of the Land Court(the`,Property"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to construct an addition to the single family dwelling on the Property and to install a HighStrengthFAST 1.00 Wastewater Treatment System on the Property in compliance with 310 CMR 15.000, State Environmental Code,Title V, Minimum Requirements for the Subsurface Disposal of Sanitary Sewage; WHEREAS, on July 23,2009, the Cape Cod Commission issued a decision approving the Grantor's application for a Hardship Exemption from the Craigville Beach District of Critical Planning Concern, pursuant to Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act, c. 716 of the Acts of 1989,as amended(the "Decision");and WHEREAS, pursuant to General Condition 5 of the Decision, the Grantor has agreed with the Town of Barnstable,a Massachusetts municipality having a mailing address of 367 Main Street, Hyannis, Massachusetts 02630(the"Town")to a restriction as to the number of bedrooms which can be included in any home built on the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, the Grantor does hereby place the following restriction on the Property in accordance with her agreement with the Town, which restriction shall run with the land and be binding upon all successors in title: 1. Any house or structure constructed on the Property shall be limited to a maximum of six(6)bedrooms 2. The Grantor shall allow the Cape Cod Commission the ability to unilaterally re- record these restrictions with the Barnstable County Registry District of the Land i Court prior to the thirty (30) year expiration of said restrictions. f For Grantor's title, see Certificate of Title No. 58363. Byron Haseotes died on May 25, 2009. Executed as a seal instrument this 14tday of , 2009. J ce . Haseotes COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS l�astle, ss. ' 2009 On this �C?�h day of SPQ6%bA—, 2009, before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared Joyce E. Haseotes, proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification,which was ,pn�(�U n6Gc)� , to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding o ttached document, and acknowledged to me that she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. t Notary Public My Commission expires: as ao A.1842033.5 •c,OFE�• �b,�e�i i CI �. y i i I i i i i I i i j ©oc=1 r 124 r 373 09-25-2009 11 :00 BARNSTABLE LAND COURT REGISTRY RESTRICTION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Joyce E. Haseotes (the "Grantor") is the owner of the property known as and numbered 293 Long Beach Road, Centerville,Barnstable County, Massachusetts, as is more particularly described in Certificate of Title No. 58363 filed with the Barnstable County Registry District of the Land Court(the"Property"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to construct an addition to the single family dwelling on the Property; WHEREAS, on July 23, 2009, the Cape Cod Commission issued a decision approving the Grantor's application for a Hardship Exemption from the Craigville Beach District of Critical Planning Concern, pursuant to Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act, c. 716 of the Acts of 1999, as amended(the"Decision");and WHEREAS, pursuant to General Condition 5 of the Decision, the Grantor has agreed with the Town of Barnstable,a Massachusetts municipality having a mailing address of 367 Main Street, Hyannis, Massachusetts 02630 to place a number of restrictions on the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, the Grantor does hereby place the following restrictions on the Property in accordance with her agreement with the Town of Barnstable,which restrictions shall run with the land and be binding upon all successors in title: 1. The Grantor shall maintain a view corridor on the Property as follows: No structures shall be maintained within thirty(30) feet of the westerly lot line of the Property(the "Setback'). Further, this Setback shall remain free of view obstructing site improvements and landscaping other than low growing plant material or existing natural vegetation. I 2. The currently existing single family dwelling on the Property and the proposed additions, as shown on the plans entitled"Additions and Renovations for The Haseotes Family,"dated August 4, 2009 and prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. i (the "Tian"),attached hereto as Exhibit A, shall constitute the full build-out of the i Property. The Grantor agrees that there shall be no further expansions, additions or changes to the bulk of the structure on the Property except in accordance with the Plan. 3. The Grantor agrees that the Property shall be used for single family residential use only. Accessory uses to the single family dwelling, including accessory apartments and accessory home occupational use of the Property, shall be prohibited 4. The Grantor shall allow the Cape Cod Commission the ability to unilaterally re- record these restrictions with the Barnstable County Registry District of the Land Court prior to the thirty (30) year expiration of said restrictions. For Grantor's title, see Certificate of Title No. 58363. Byron Haseotes died on May 25, 2009. [SIGNATURE ON FOLLOWING PAGE] I i i i i i i f i I I i I Executed as a seal instrument this&day of �4 009. Jo e E. 14aseotes COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 1�(1i�esP,r Barmtable, ss. .(ZPQ�t?M6f 16, 2009 On this day of-�- =" 2009, before me, the undersigned notary public, 0—ft— personally.appeared Joyce E. Haseotes, roved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was��r'p' Y-MOL-) , to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. Notary Public cc,, My Commission expires: o�S o1d� \�\111111111I1/�//�j A.S23. oh ZZ �ff<llNltiltll��� i i I i ! i i i Exhibit A [INSERT EXPANSION PLANS] 1842248.5 i i I i i F , .:._...;.�. i a.q.... rs arc ..._. ..�.'_.__•�..-., EA UNITX e�Aeees _r ( 4 7873 arm - ..................... 00 r .q...q... .....«.—..._.._ '.-----'-- -- Q :.•ib�rADINTIONSAREWOVATIO, ....._._. ! ?,..�,•••'�tr-Y .r �r-.. �:!f - ,a,.wJB THE HMILYES FA ('PROPOSED FROM ELEVATION NI ++ 193 LONG REACH ROAD - rwv x,r•r•r CEYrMVILLE,MA ..':.::":ITT:',:`-(:L_ ... '.Y.,S.`L;.'..::T.:.:::._.__......JI��:...._-."'•�JL_. _ -^:T:.^.:":::::.:'::.':.:._.::. �:.��. REVISIONS MADE SINCE COMMISSIONS APPROVAL i y. 1. (4)DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS ON THE FRONT ELEVATION -_ 2. REMOVAL OF CIRCLE WINDOW IN FRONT GABLE. 3. LONGER DOUBLE HUNGS IN GREAT ROOM. i`r "_� r;%'Lk�` '' ':" 1-u_ +r'r,...,••'..,x*.. ®a. 4. REMOVAL OF CIRCULAR WINDOW IN REAR GABLE. _ '� �( yT r Y`ii "'°'��RW`••"p' 5. NEW GAS FIREPLACE W �'' J`:t..T. r$!�.'('�A:?:x:.tON `'c '� ,, ® m1�'.�...^'•' /ADJACENT BUILT-INS. ](? PRO,(nT p—ft R ...4` Y,'., i.,.'. - own is u Ww - 6. REVISED H/C BATHROOM LAYOUT 0PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION ����"W'~� "�� 7. NEW LAUNDRY CLOSET IN SPACE PREVIOUSLY '"d�`•+ ,.1-- v.n nq nao. . r:a wsaa a.un ALLOCATED FOR THE H/C BATHROOM. rwA.(.E.aura a.o..w my AM Im m nix etmp _ rPt urso.a Tn ca w.aL ..e.. PO—SET woavzT T Pm�(n SET • i; PRYgNRS 1n ....._..ate--_•_• ::".....:....::...T- .:_.. - ........:..... 011.. A -.._........Y......�.�i,y.�1_•' __— ..''.:,.J: i •ij��J 43 a uxlass orNawu Nono. nP__ROPOSEI REAR ELEVATION s-a?w. EA TOY.NUNe[ or SHEETS M6 SN[R rw.Vn [� W A . QI OOVKETcTC SET W . �aPgNG nMxwnS ' ERT ARCwTEcrs INC. -- 917 ROUTE 6A,uMi 0 PO BOY 343 YARYOUTWORT,4A 0287S W(SOB)382-8883 fa.(SOB)382-4883 f OIFL THE HASEOTES I / / / / -_ FAMILY /`� 293 LONG BEACH ROAD • / TTT fi / �// CENTERVILLE,MA - .. //j/, / ,•� �uo�¢i ,',J PAoatc.�oaio9...kn ' O+n foam �amu.or.[.aw noae a^ ♦1 II(Y V MIISL•M.W.EO • '//` �%:,'�•'./:�•/ w.er wuc umu:4a WQ_a.aaxs ma OC[ ROOF PLAN SCALE: ll s st .I. ...�.. ....a..__._ ,:�._...::.:...:.._._..,,.,.._.......r...r.......:....." ::..iii REM"-. ® Na.LS3 ORQRwS(MOt[0. r� PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION !1 W. vain 19 uxuss+ctauo.a¢o 9• •co�Pl.ca s�or - aoaax9 w.wucs P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC UTTER W TRAMMYTAL CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND PLANNING PATE_ J B NO. 200 North Bedford Street _ , 6— O DD 7 ATTENTION East Bridgewater, MA 02333 RE: p l C Tel (508) 378-3421 Fax (508) 378-8382 �3 �U6 604-61� 2To BOAZO 0 ,= ©Z46 �' WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Via the following Items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter Cl Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION y` ev 8- - !C S G-�✓I G�;S��-�U T.copies o C THESE ARE TRANSMITTED.as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ A_ pproved as submitted Cl Resubmit �l t" ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted Cl Submit copies for distibution ( As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints V❑ For review and comment ❑ REMARKS_6%V. © V . l © -7 t a-nc! cam,`v u�U PA d �V p7� t h 9 d4e e ��tw ►�i 410 k-.e _ u COPY TO C.:�� T Il e SIGNE If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. P.M.P. ASSOCIATES,- LLC UTTER W TRANSHOTTAd CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND PLANNING DATE ^ — Q JOB NO. �10�J 200 North Bedford Street ATTENTION V East Bridgewater, MA 02333 RE. SEPTIC D FS 16-,A-) Tel (508) 378-3421 a673 L-0"6- 64216H 2-0 Fax (508) 378-8382 TO 90AE1D 0f= 140-1 zoo m4i o 5 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION e� - l C , G G-6>6�kV Ana"vaA THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval Cl Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distibution V-_As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review�and comment ❑ j I REMARKS :k . � mod/ o © 55�c� bu 0, 7 Pt &nJ coAvu aJxL2- k-,k /r. D a: vwe ®n t,kL CL6 L ' ' kl n 'an COPY TO i SIGNE ei, L �o/�� If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. ASSOCIATES; LLC LETTER OF TRAI 14HOTTAL CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND PLANNING DATE q JOB NO. h� 200 North Bedford Street ATTENTION / (J East Bridgewater, MA 02333 RE: Tel (508) 378-3421 Fax (508) 378-8382 RD To �o1JSC12U/�t�ll� �0/`�/7f�O�J �y HAW ST &&132lf5 . M OU WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter O Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION j ZG� 6e4netel Ceni� oi 13 lip (5,A coel Q' THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: al!*or approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distibution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints O For review and com nt 0 REMARKS Oet !X V vel 4,,, 4&J 711 a— e-e .e "c n r-/ �/rAZZIL -77 COPY TO C1 1 E 1� li��/13a ` r SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services °s Thomas F Geiler,Director Public Health Division 1639. 1 39. Thomas McKean,Director 4 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601` Office: 508-862-4644 Fax: 508-790-6304 Date: ' 46 -/0 Sewage Permit# zoO -3 V Assessor's Map/Parcel 3 Installer&Designer Certification Form P.e w,, 1� PE Designer: f KR A-5500147 0 /iL6 Installer: .To2G E_X(_AyA-r1 N1J Address: &OZ) 1`1. &4, 5' Address: PO Scy- 1? q -3 0 On 9 P b9 /7nsrprzv &CA�//lTj04as issued a permit to install a (date) (installer,) septic system at ZQ 3 �•o►, �C@r,� Koa, based on a design drawn by (address) / PXR AM60A70, Ur, dated (Zev 9�BIOQ (designer) certify that the septic system referenced above was installed substantially according to the design, which may include minor approved changes such as lateral relocation of the distribution box and/or septic tank. Stripout (if required) was inspected and the soils were found satisfactory. I certify that the septic system referenced above was installed with major changes (i.e. greater than 10' lateral relocation of the SAS or any vertical relocation of any component of the septic system) but in accordance with State & Local Regulations. Plan revision or certified as-built by designer to follow. Stripout(if required) was inspected and the soils were found ,: 0F Mgss::>... o� MICHAEL qCy E. _. z PERRAULT m - ller' nature o CIVIL y U No.29399 O � �pc TEP (Design •' _Signature) (Affix DesinS �tanp Here) PLEASE RETURN TO BARNSTABLE PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION. CERTIFICAft F COMPLIANCE WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL BOTH THIS FORM AND AS- BUILT CARD ARE RECEIVED BY THE BARNSTABLE PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION. THANK YOU. q:\office forms\desigiercertification form.doc P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC CIVIL ENGINEERING & .LAND PLANNING CONSULTANTS JeVowihw woreerhW/fleA faw, V! 200 North Bedford Street Tel.(508)378-3421 East Bridgewater,MA 02333 Fax.(508)378-8382 www.pmpassoc.com Board of Health Public Health Division December 17, 2009 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Subject: Initial Septic System Piping As-built—293 Long Beach Rd. (Project No. P007.00) Dear Board Members, The septic system on the above referenced lot was field checked,pipe/component elevations surveyed and the Piping As-built Plan prepared per the requirements of 310CMR15.021(3) and 310CMR15.220. At the present time,the Septic Tank,piping from the existing house,piping to the new addition (with end cap for the connection),piping to the distribution box and the infiltrator leaching system with vent have been installed. The pump in the existing house has to be installed as well as the Fast system. It is our understanding that these components will be installed in early Spring 2010 (once the new addition is constructed and the power source is available. This letter is to certify(declare)that, in my opinion,the individual sewage disposal system presently constructed on this lot has been installed as noted above, in general conformance with the design intent and the provisions of Title 5 of the State Sanitary Code as well as the Town requirements. Any modifications made during construction are reflected on the Piping As-b@-A o Plan. " This declaration is limited to the provisions of the State Sanitary Code and local Board of Health requirements only. The backfilling and final restoration of the ground surface or otl'er site features are specifically excluded from this declaration(Opinions regarding the final restoration Zzl of the ground surface or other site features are specifically excluded from this declaration, sWce a Final Topographic As-built Plan will have to be submitted). � _„ r s It should be clearly understood that P.M.P. did not provide our client with construction observation or construction management services. It is the responsibility of the licensed installer to properly construct the system(PMP is not part of the contract with the installer). It is our understanding that the Board of Health performs certain observations during the construction, which are independent of the services performed by PMP. P.M. P. Associates, LLC does PMP guarantee the operation of the system. Page 2 of 2 Initial Septic System Piping As-built—293 Long Beach Rd. December 17, 2009 Two copies of the As-Built Plan are enclosed. Should the Board have any questions in regard to this letter,please contact me. Very truly yours, P.M.P. Ass ciates C Michael :Perrault, P.E. Manager CC: Joyce Haseotes Conservation Commission C.J. Riley Builder, Inc.,10B Wianno Ave., Osterville, MA 02655 Andrew Nixon, Pastore Excavation �\ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ExECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292.5500 MITT ROMNEY Governor STEPHEN R.PRITCHARD Secretary KERRY HEALEY Lieutenant Governor ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Commissioner RENEWAL OF CERTIFICATION FOR GENERAL USE Pursuant to Title 5, 310 CMR 15.000 Name and Address of Applicant: Bio-Microbics, Inc. 8450 Cole Parkway Shawnee,KS 66227 Trade name of technology and models: MicroFAST®Treatment System Models MicroFASTV 0.5, 0.75, 0.9, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0;HighStrengthFASTO Treatment System Models HighStrengthFASM 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0 and NitriFAST®Treatment System Models NitriFASM 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0 (hereinafter the "System"). Schematic drawings illustrating each of the models and an Inspection Checklist are attached and are part of this Certification. Transmittal Number: W072368 Date of Issuance: June 16, 2006 Renewal Date: June 16, 2011 Authority for Issuance Pursuant to Title 5 of the State Environmental Code, 310 CMR 15.000, the Department of Environmental Protection hereby issues this Certification for General Use to: Bio-Microbics, Inc., 8450 Cole Parkway, Shawnee, KS 66227 (hereinafter "the Company"), certifying the System described herein for General Use in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Sale and use of the System are conditioned on and subject to compliance by the Company and the System owner with the terms and conditions set forth below. Any noncompliance with the terms or conditions of this Certification constitutes a violation of 310 CMR 15.000. i _June 16, 2006 Glenn Haas, Director Date Division of Watershed Management Department of Environmental Protection This information is available in alternate format.Call Donald M.Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057.TDD Service-1-800-298-2207. MassDEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.mass.gov/dep 0 Printed on Recycled Paper y . Bio-Microbics,Inc.,Renewal of Certification for General Use Page 2 of 7 I. Purpose 1. The purpose of this Certification is to allow the use of the System in Massachusetts on a General Use basis. 2. With the necessary permits and approvals required by 310 CMR 15.000,this Certification authorizes the installation and use of the System in Massachusetts. 3. The System may be installed on all facilities where a system in compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 exists on site or could be built and for which a site evaluation in compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 has been approved by the local approving authority or by DEP if DEP approval is required by 310 CMR 15.000. This Certification for General Use does not allow the use of the System on facilities for nitrogen reduction in a Department designated nitrogen sensitive or limited area as defined in 310 CMR 15.214 and 15.215. 4. The System is approved for use at facilities with a maximum design flow less than 10,000 gallons per day (GPD). II. Design Standards 1. The System, MicroFAST®0.5, 0.75, 0.9, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0, and, HighStrengthFAST® 1.0, 1.5 3.0 4.5 and 9.0 and Ni triFAST® 0.5 0.75 0.9 1.5 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0 units are installed in a tank or tanks having a primary settling zone and an aerobic biological zone. Solids settle in the primary settling zone that is quiescent. In the aerobic zone,the sewage is continually agitated and aerated. Bacteria in the sewage attach to the surface of a submerged plastic media;they reproduce by consuming the organic material in the sewage. 2. The MicroFAST®0.5, 0.75 and 0.9, HighStrengthFAST® 1.0 and NitriFAST®0.5, 0.75 and 0.9 are installed in the second compartment of a two-compartment tank with a total liquid capacity of at least 1,500 gallons constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.226. 3. The MicroFAST®, HighStrengthFAST®and NitriFAST® 1.5 are installed in the second compartment of a two compartment 3000-gallon tank constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.226. 4. The MicroFAST®, HighStrengthFAST®and NitriFAST®3.0, 4.5, and 9.0 units are installed in a separate tank constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.226. The units are located between a standard Title 5 septic tank, designed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.223 and 15.224, and the soil adsorption system (SAS). Bio-Microbics,Inc.,Renewal of Certification for General Use Page 3 of 7 5. New Construction less than 2000 gpd: For residential Systems less than 2,000 GPD, the SAS size required by 310 CMR 15.242,LTAR: Effluent Loading Rates can be reduced by 50 percent provided that the facility is not located in an area described in Section I, item 3 and complies with the requirements of Section IV item 2. a. Systems with a 50 percent reduced SAS shall include an effluent pressure distribution system designed in accordance with Department guidance. 6. New Construction 2,000 gpd to less than 10,000 gpd and all non-residential facilities: No reduction in SAS field size is allowed under this approval. 7. Access shall be provided to all tanks in the primary settling and aerobic biological zones in accordance with 310 CMR 15.228 (2). The tanks shall have at least three manholes with readily removable impermeable covers of durable material provided at grade. Two manholes, over the inlet and outlet, shall have a minimum opening of 20 inches. All access ports and manhole covers shall be installed and maintained at grade to allow for maintenance of the System 8. The control panel including alarms shall be mounted in a location accessible to the operator of the System. III. General Conditions I. The provisions of 310 CMR 15.000 are applicable to the use and operation of this System,the System Owner and the Company, except those that specifically have been varied by the terms of this Certification. 2. Any required operation and maintenance, monitoring and testing shall be performed in accordance with a Department approved plan. Any required sample analysis shall be conducted by an independent U.S. EPA or DEP approved testing laboratory or a Department approved independent university laboratory, unless otherwise approved by the Department in writing. It shall be a violation of this Certification to falsify any data collected pursuant to an approved testing plan,to omit any required data or to fail to submit any report required by such plan. 3. The facility served by the System, and the System itself, shall be open to inspection and sampling by the Department and the local approving authority at all reasonable times. 4. In accordance with applicable law,the Department and the local approving authority may require the owner of the System to cease operation of the System and/or to take any other action as it deems necessary to protect public health, safety, welfare or the environment. 5. The Department has not determined that the performance of the System will provide a level of protection to public health and safety and the environment that is at least equivalent to that of a sewer. Accordingly,no System shall be upgraded or expanded, Bio-Microbics,Inc.,Renewal of Certification for General Use Page 4 of 7 if it is feasible to connect the facility to a sanitary sewer, unless as allowed pursuant to 310 CMR 15.004. 6. Design and installation and use of the System shall be in strict conformance with the Company's DEP approved plans and specifications and 310 CMR 15.000, subject to this Certification. IV. Conditions Applicable to the System Owner l. The System is certified in connection with the discharge of sanitary wastewater only. Any non-sanitary wastewater generated and/or used at the facility served by the System shall not be introduced into the System and shall be lawfully disposed of. 2. New Construction less than 2000 gpd• For residential Systems with a design flow less than 2000 GPD,the System owner initially shall size the SAS in accordance with 310 CMR 15.242 to demonstrate that a conventional Title 5 SAS, including a reserve area, can be installed on the site. The System owner can then reduce the size of the SAS as calculated in 310 CMR 15.242 by 50 percent.No additional reduction in sizing based on innovative technology shall be taken. The total area required in the initial sizing, which must include the area designated for the System and the primary and reserve area, shall be preserved and the System owner shall ensure that no permanent structures, excluding the System and 50 percent reduced SAS, or other structures are constructed on that area and that the area is not disturbed in any manner that will render it unusable for future installation of a conventional Title 5 SAS. 3. Operation and Maintenance agreement: a. Throughout its life,the System shall be under an operation and maintenance (O&M) agreement.No O&M agreement shall be for less than one year. b. No System shall be used until an O&M agreement is submitted to the local approving authority which: i Provides for the contracting of a person or firm trained by the Company as provided in Section V (5) and competent in providing services consistent with the System's specifications,with the operation and maintenance requirements specified by the Company and the designer and with any specified by the Department; ii Contains procedures for notification to the Department and the local approving authority within five days of knowledge of a System failure, malfunction or alarm event and for corrective measures to be taken immediately; and Bio-Microbics,Inc.,Renewal of Certification for General Use Page 5 of 7 iii Provides the name of an operator,which must be a Massachusetts certified operator as required by 257 CMR 2.00 of an appropriate grade that will operate and monitor the System. iv For residential Systems installed with a 50 percent reduced SAS the operator must inspect, field test and maintain the System at least every six_ months in accordance with the Departments policy and anytime tis'f ere is an alarm event. For residential Systems installed with a standard sized SAS the inspections and field testing shall be conducted at least once per year. v For all other Systems the operator must inspect, field test and maintain the System at least every three months and anytime there is an alarm event. 4. The System owner shall at all times have the System properly operated and maintained in accordance with this Certification,the designer's operation and maintenance requirements and the Company's approved procedures. The System owner shall notify the Department and the local approving authority, in writing, within seven days of a change in the operator. 5. The System owner shall provide a copy of this Certification,prior to the signing of a purchase and sale agreement for the facility served by the System or any portion thereof,to the proposed new owner. 6. The System owner shall furnish the Department any information that the Department requests regarding the System, within 21 days of the date of receipt of that request. 7. By September 301h of each year,the System owner shall submit to the Department and the local approving authority an O&M checklist and a technology checklist, completed by the System operator for each inspection performed during the previous 12 months. Copies of the checklists are attached to this Certification. V. Conditions Applicable to the Company 1. By January 31 st of each year,the Company shall submit to the Department, a report, signed by a corporate officer, general partner, or Company owner that contains information on the System for the previous calendar year. The report shall state: the number of units of the System sold for use in Massachusetts during the previous year; the address of each installed System,the owner's name and address, the type of use (e.g. residential, commercial, school, institutional)and the design flow; and for all systems installed since the first issuance of Certification for General Use, all known failures, malfunctions, and corrective actions taken and the address of each such event. 2. The Company shall notify the Director of the Watershed Permitting Program at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer of ownership of the technology for which this Certification is issued. Said notification shall include the name and address of Bio-Microbics,Inc.,Renewal of Certification for General Use Page 6 of 7 the proposed owner containing a specific date of transfer of ownership, responsibility, coverage and liability between them. All provisions of this Certification applicable to the Company shall be applicable to successors and assigns of the Company, unless the Department determines otherwise. 3. Company shall maintain and update as necessary the following: minimum installation requirements; an operating manual, including information on substances that should not be discharged to the System; a maintenance checklist; and a recommended schedule for maintenance of the System consistent with the Department's requirements essential to consistent successful performance of the installed Systems. 4. The Company shall make available, in printed and electronic format, the referenced procedures and protocol in item 3 above,to owners, operators, designers and installers of the System. 5. The Company shall maintain a program of designer and operator training and continuing education, as approved by the Department. The Company shall maintain and annually update, and make available the list of trained operators by January 31 S`. 6. The Company shall furnish the Department any information that the Department requests regarding the System, within 21 days of the date of receipt of that request. 7. The Company shall include copies of this Certification and the procedures described in Section V (3)with each System that is sold. In any contract executed by the Company for distribution or resale of the System, the Company shall require the distributor or reseller to provide each purchaser of the System with copies of this Certification and the procedures described in Sections V (3). 8. The Company or its designee shall conduct an intended use review of the System prior to the sale of any nonresidential unit or any System over 3000 gpd to ensure that the proposed use of the System is consistent with the unit's capabilities. 9. The Company shall comply with 310 CMR 15.000 and all the Department policies and guidance that apply and as they may be amended from time to time. 10. If the Company wishes to continue this Certification after its expiration date,the Company shall apply for and obtain a renewal of this Certification. The Company shall submit a renewal application at least 180 days before the expiration date of this Certification, unless written permission for a later date has been granted in writing by the Department. VI. Reporting 1. All notices and documents required to be submitted to the Department by this Certification shall be submitted to: Bio-Microbics,Inc.,Renewal of Certification for General Use Page 7 of 7 Director Watershed Permitting Program Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street - 6th floor Boston, Massachusetts 02108 V. Rights of the Department 1. The Department may suspend, modify or revoke this Certification for cause, including, but not limited to, noncompliance with the terms of this Certification, non- payment of any annual compliance assurance fee, for obtaining the Certification by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts or any change in or discovery of conditions that would constitute grounds for discontinuance of the Certification, or as necessary for the protection of public health, safety,welfare, or the environment, and as authorized by applicable law. The Department reserves its rights to take any enforcement action authorized by law with respect to this Certification and/or the System against the owner, or operator of the System, and/or the Company. VI. Expiration Date 1. Notwithstanding the expiration date of this Certification, any System sold and installed prior to the expiration date of this Certification, and approved, installed and maintained in compliance with this Certification (as it may be modified) and 310 CMR 15.000, may remain in use unless the Department, the local approval authority, or a court requires the System to be modified or removed, or requires discharges to the System to cease. i MUINCORPORATED FIELD INSPECTION & SERVICE REPORT FAST® wastewater treatment systems INSTALLATION AUTHORIZED SERVICE PROVIDER Installation Address Name Owner Name Street Mail Address Mail Address city State Zi city State Zip Phone Fax Phone Fax e-mail e-mail INSTALLATION INFORMATION Model No. Serial No. Date of Installation Date of last pumpout MAINTENANCE PERFORMED EQUIPMENT YES NO AND COMMENTS Electrical Panel(s) Visual Alarm Operating Audio Alarm Operating if resent Blower s Air Inlet Filter Clean Blower Hood Vents Clear Excessive Noise Excessive Vibration Treatment Unit(s) Unusual Odor Pum out Required: Primary Settling Zone Aerobic Treatment Zone EFFLUENT(options) LIMIT RESULT Estimated Daily Flow H Standard Units 6-9 S.U. Color Clear Temperature Odor Slightly Musty odor not se tic OWNER SIGNATURE TECHNICIAN SIGNATURE SERVICE DATE EXCERPT FROM THE BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING MINUTES 9/08/09: B. Michael Perrault,_P M.P Associates, representing Joyce Haseotes, owner 293 Long Beach Road, Centerville;proposed addition, approval edquested for 1/A Fast System monitoring plan. Michael Perrault presented the plan and noted the Cape Cod Commission requested an I/A Fast System be used even though the property did not necessitate it according to Title V. The Board did not agree with the ground water elevation used. Other properties on the street used ground water levels much lower than 3.5 ngvd. Upon reviewing the files on the street, the Board felt a 2.0 ground water elevation would be more accurate. Mr. Sawayanagi asked if the reserve area could be moved to the side of the house. Mr. Perrault explained the Cape Cod Commission had preferred the location of the reserve on the plan. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Sawayanagi, seconded by Ms. Rask, the Board voted to approve the I/A Fast System with the following conditions: 1) redesign based on a 2.0 elevation, 2) change the plan to state a standby power source will be provided, and 3) six bedroom deed restriction be recorded at the Registry of Deeds and a proper copy be provided to the Public Health Division. (Unanimously, voted in favor.) Hof BAA, CAPE COD COMMISSION p 3225 MAIN STREET v 1W. P.O. BOX 226 . I BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02630 �ssACIiOSQS (508) 362-3828 FAX (508) 362-3136 E-mail: frontdesk@capecodcommission.org 4' II ^a TO: Town of Barnstable Town Clerk, Building Inspector, Town Planner, Planning Board, Board of Appeals, Conservation Commission, Board of Health and Police Chief FROM: Gail Hanley, Clerk of the Commission SUBJECT: Haseotes Addition District of Critical Planning Concern Hardship Exemption Decision DATE: July 27, 2009 Enclosed please find a copy of the District of Critical Planning Concern Hardship t Exemption Decision for the Haseotes Addition project that was approved by the Cape Cod Commission on July 23, 2009. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. (26'Nr aq wNg P64 OV BA ,s CAPE COD COMMISSION �$ 3225 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 YssACH�3s��S (508)362-3828 FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org Date: July 23, 2009 To: Barry Weiner, Esquire Eliza Cox, Esquire Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C. Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP 100 North Washington Street P.O. Box 1630 Boston, Massachusetts 02114 Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 From: Cape Cod Commission RE: District of Critical Planning Concern (DCPC) Hardship Exemption Cape Cod Commission Act, Section 23 Applicant/ Owner: Joyce Haseotes, 293 Long Beach Road, Centerville, Massachusetts Project: Haseotes Addition Project#: HDEX# 08023 Certificate of Title: Certificate No. 58363 14594A & 16179A DECISION OF THE CAPE COD COMMISSION SUMMARY The Cape Cod Commission (the "Commission") hereby approves with conditions the Hardship Exemption application of Joyce Haseotes (the "Applicant") for an addition to the single-family residence at 293 Long Beach Road in Centerville, MA pursuant to Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act (the "Act"), c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended. The decision is rendered pursuant to a vote of the Commission on July 23, 2009. Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 1 of 27 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The property consists of a 0.66-acre lot at 293 Long Beach Road in Centerville identified by the Town of Barnstable as Assessor's Map 185 Parcel 34 (the "site"). The site is abutted by barrier beach and Nantucket Sound to the south, residences to the east and west, and by Long Beach Road to the north. A single-family residence that was constructed circa 1929 occupies the site. At the time of their iiutial Hardship Exemption application submission, Byron and Joyce Haseotes were originally proposing to construct a 4,276-square foot(s.£) two-floor addition to their approximately 5,150-s.f. residence. After the passing of her husband, Byron Haseotes, Joyce Haseotes revised the proposed plans to include a 1,937-s.f. one-floor addition to the residence. The Applicant is seeking an exemption to the limited moratorium on building permits, which was established by the creation'of the Craigville Beach District of Critical Planning Concern (DCPC). PROCEDURAL HISTORY On October 15, 2008,Attorney Eliza Cox of Nutter, McClennen&Fish,LLP on behalf of Byron and Joyce Haseotes submitted an application to the Commission requesting a Hardship Exemption pursuant to Section 23 of the Act for the construction of a 4,276 s.f. (2,904 s.f. of livable space) addition to their single-family residence at 293 Long Beach Road in Centerville, MA. On December 18, 2008, the application was deemed complete, and a duly noticed public hearing was held to consider this request on January 13, 2009. After this public hearing and upon receiving feedback from the subcommittee that a revised plan could be more in line with the purposes of the DCPC, the Applicant's team met with Commission staff on several occasions to discuss proposed revisions to the plans. On April 15,. 2009, the Commission received revised plans and materials for a proposed addition consisting of 2,853 s.£ on two floors. These plans eliminated unfinished attic space and a closet on the.second floor, and a full kitchen, separate entryway/foyer, and a bathroom on the first floor. Additionally, the proposed septic system leachfield location was moved to an area outside of the Centerville River watershed. In response to Commission staff comments regarding the revised plans, the Applicant again revised the addition plans to reduce the bulk and mass of the structure and submitted the revised civil and architectural plans to.the Commission between June 3-8, 2009. The revised plans eliminated the second floor of the addition, consisting of the removal of a bedroom, den/office, medical supply /utility closet, and bathroom, removed the exterior deck proposed along the southern side of the addition on the barrier beach, removed the exterior dormers from the addition, and slightly reduced the height of the addition. The total square footage of the new addition proposed was 1,937 s.f. A duly noticed public hearing to consider the revised request was held on June 10, 2009. Subcommittee meetings were held on June 15, 2009, June 25, 2009, and July 14, 2009. Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 2 of 27 I On June 15, 2009, the subcomrnittee deliberated on the project. Based upon the Applicant's assertion that her hardship was a physical one that required the addition to be built, the chair of the subcommittee requested that the Applicant obtain a letter from Mrs: Haseotes' physician commenting on her physical disabilities. Upon receipt of this letter and after further deliberations on the project, at the June 25, 2009 meeting, the subconunittee voted(2 in favor and 1 opposed) to approve the Hardship Exemption application with conditions and directed staff to draft a decision for their review. On July 14, 2009,the subcommittee reviewed the draft decision and voted(2 in favor and 1 opposed) to forward the draft decision, approving the hardship exemption application with conditions, to the full Conunission. A final public hearing was held before the full Conunission on July 23, 2009, during which the Commission voted six in favor and four opposed to approve the Hardship Exemption application. MATERIALS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD In addition to the list of materials submitted for the record as listed below in Table 1, the application and notices of public hearings relative thereto, correspondence,the minutes of public meetings and hearings, and all other writings contained in the DRI file are hereby incorporated into the record by reference. TABLE'1 Materials Submitted for the Record Materials From the Applicant Date Subrnitted Hardship application materials submitted by E. Coy:to Commission 10/15/08 staff Memorandum with attached Hardship exemption application materials 10/15/08 submitted by E. Cox to K. Senatori Letter from E. Cox to Brona Simon(Massachusetts Historical Society) 10/17/08 re: project notification form Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: Tuesday meeting date 10/29/08 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting dates 10/30/08 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori, J. Buntich re: meeting date 10/31/08 Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached stamped MHC 11/10/08 form Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: project update 11/21/08 Letter providing additional information from E. Cox to K. Senatori 12/5/08 with attached printed emails from R. Gatewood(Conservation Administrator, Barnstable) re: resource areas Memorandum and attached civil site plans from E. Cox to K. Senatori 12/17/08 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: public hearing date 12/19/08 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: email confirmation 12/28/08 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: copies 1/6/09 Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 3 of 27 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: copies 1/6/09 Memo with attached supplemental information for Subcommittee from 1/7/09 E. Cox to K. Senatori Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: site visit 1/8/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: site visit confirmation 1/12/09 Print out of Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act from E. Cox . 1/13/09 to staff and subcommittee Email-from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: conference call 1/26/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: draft minutes, availability 2/6/09 Email fiom E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting time, minutes 2/9/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting minutes 2/9/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting time 2/11/09 Revised elevation& floor plan submitted by hand from E. Tolley to K. 2/12/09 Senatori Minutes from public hearing on 1-13-09 with revisions by E. Cox to K. 2/12/09 Senatori Email from C. McGrath to K. Senatori re: scheduling 3/5/09 Email from C. McGrath to K. Senatori re: scheduling 3/6/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: thanks 3/9/09 Updated plans, nitrogen loading calculations, `revised' minutes 3/12/09 Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached updated plans 4/15/09 and calculations Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: response to S. Michaud's 4/24/09 comments Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting time change 4/29/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting time confirmation 4/29/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: possible scheduling conflict 5/13/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: thanks 5/13/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting date change 5/15/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting scheduling 5/20/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting time 5/20/09 Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: response to January staff 5/20/09 report Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: deed restrictions, lowest point of 5/28/09 addition Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attendance confirmation 5/27/09 Revised septic, sketch, and site plans submitted by hand 5/28/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached deed restrictions &town 5/29/09 comments Email from B. Weiner to J. Wielgus re: plan& staff report revisions 6/l/09 Email from E. Tolley to K. Senatori, E. Cox re: confirmation of lowest 6/3/09 point of addition Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: confirmation of deck removal 6/3/09 Fax from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: confirmation of deck removal 6/3/09 Memorandum from B. Weiner to K. Senatori re: attached Coastal 6/3/09 Resources consultant payment Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 4 of 27 Memo from E. Tolley to K. Senatori re: Attached and revised floor and 6/3/09 exterior elevation plans Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached updated civil site 6/3/09 plans, nitrogen loading calculations, updated lot coverage calculations, mailing materials Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: revised civil/septic plans 6/5/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached updated civil/septic plan 6/5/09 Memorandum from E. Tolley to K. Senatori re: Attached and revised 6/8/09 floor and exterior elevation plans Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached revised architectural 6/8/09 Tans Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: out of office 6/12/09 Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached revised civil site 6/5/09 plan; full size Email from B. Weiner to K. Senatori re: attendance confirmation 6/15/09. Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: recording information 6/24/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: total s.f. 6/24/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori with attached plan 6/29/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: copies 7/10/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori with attached draft deed restrictions 7/14/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori with revised draft deed restrictions 7/16/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori with revised draft deed restrictions 7/21/09 Materials from Commission Staff Date Submitted Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: meeting with applicant 10/28/08 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: application completeness 10/28/08 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: project comments 12/7/08 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: public hearing 12/22/08 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: public hearing confirmation 12/22/08 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: copies 1/6/09 Staff report 1/6/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: public hearing 1/7/09 Email fiom K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: public hearing 1/7/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: site visit time/day 1/7/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: comments for staff report 1/7/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: site visit 1/9/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: attached comment letter 1/11/09 Fax from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: attached comment letter from 1/12/09 anonymous Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: site visit confirmation 1./12/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: nitrogen loading calculations 1/21/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting conflict 2/6/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: draft minutes, meeting dates 2/6/09 Email fiom K. Senatori to E. Cox re: word doe, meeting date 2/9/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting confirmation 2/11/09 Email from K. Senatori to C. McGrath re: meeting date/time 3/6/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: S. Michaud's attached comments 4/23/09 Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 5 of 27 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: S. Michaud's attached 4/27/09 comments Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting 4/29/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting time change 4/29/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: noticing delay 5/13/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: hearing confirmation 5/15/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting time 5/19/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting/memorandum 5/20/09 Memorandum via facsimile from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: Coastal 5/21/09 Resources Consultant Fee Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: attached updated staff report 5/27/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: list of deed restrictions 5/28/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: lowest point of renovation 6/3/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: revised memo 6/3/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: revised memo for mailing 6/3/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox& B. Weiner re: updated staff report 6/3/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: revised civil plans 6/5/09 Email from K. Senatori to B. Weiner re: updated staff report 6/9/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: attached email in support 6/10/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: subcommittee meeting date 6/12/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: Haseotes past permits 6/12/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: subcommittee meeting 6/17/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: meeting date, attached letter 6/24/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: recording information,mtg dates 6/24/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: s.f. totals 6/24/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: s.f. clarification 6/24/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox requesting plan 6/26/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Miller Buntich re: subcommittee meeting 6/30/09 Email with decision from K. Senatori to E. Cox, B. Weiner, J. Buntich 7/7/09 Email fiom K. Senatori to E. Cox requesting copies 7/10/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox with attached draft decision 7/16/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: deed restrictions 7/16/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: proposed language 7/23/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: proposed language 7/23/09 Materials from Town of Barnstable Date Received Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: meeting dates 10/28/08 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori,E. Cox re: meeting 10/30/08 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: meeting& town comments 12/5/08 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: meeting with staff 12/9/08 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: Tom McKean's (Director of 1/5/09 Public Health, Barnstable) attached comments Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: town comments 1/7/09 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori, S. Kor'eff re: draft comments 5/19/09 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: meeting attendance 6/12/09 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: past pen-nit discussions 6/14/09 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: attached ZBA files 6/15/09 Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 6 of 27 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: meeting attendance 6/24/09 Email from J. Buntich cc: K. Senatori re: accessory uses 7/16/09 Email from J. Buntich cc: K. Senatori re: revised drafts 7/22/09 Materials from Others Date Received Email from anonymous to K. Senatori re: opposition to project 1/5/09 Letter from J. Driscoll in support of the project 6/6/09 Letter from J. and B. Haseotes in support of theproject ._ 6/9/09 Email from A. Marty to K. Senatori in support of the project 6/9/09. Email from J. Bieling to K. Senatori in support of the project 6/10/09 Letter from E. Weber, M.D. to K. Senatori re: Mrs. Haseotes' health 6/16/09 TESTIMONY Public hearing—January 13, 2009 A public hearing was held at 6:00 pm on January 13, 2009 in Rooms 11&12 of the Barnstable Superior Courthouse. Attorney Eliza Cox of Nutter, McClennen & Fish,LLP, Mr. Erik Tolley of ERT Architects, and Mr. Mike Perrault of P.M.P Associates, Inc. presented the proposed addition plans on behalf of Byron and Joyce Haseotes. The Applicant's team indicated Mr. Haseotes currently lives in the house, but that is has become dangerous for him, as the hallways are very narrow and that the bathrooms aren't wheelchair accessible. The Applicant also noted that the addition has to be elevated and they are connecting to the existing house but they are not making any alterations to the existing house. The Applicant's team suggested that the amount of time and money and investment that the client made prior to the.implementation of the DCPC, together with Mr. Haseotes' medical conditions and the fact that this existing home does not accommodate his needs, constitute a substantial hardship. Ms. Kristy Senatori, Ms. Sarah Korjeff, and Mr. Scott Michaud presented the staff report. Staff gave a brief overview of the existing site setting, the Cape Cod Commission's jurisdiction, an overview of the DCPC, staff analysis in the applicable resource issue areas, and conclusions. Staff explained the purpose of the DCPC building permit moratorium and said that the regulations are anticipated in June of this year. Staff said that an applicant may apply for a Hardship Exemption for any development that can demonstrate that a suspension of action on a local development permit application during a period of moratorium constitutes a substantial hardship. Staff suggested that the project as proposed would substantially derogate from the intent and purpose of the DCPC and the Act in the area of water resources, coastal resources, and community character. Staff noted they had not received nitrogen-loading calculations and the Applicant's counsel responded that they would be provided. Subcommittee members asked questions of the Applicant's team and Commission staff regarding the existing house, specifics regarding the proposed FAST septic system and leachfield and their proposed locations, Mr. Haseotes' physical disabilities, and the use of the house by the Haseotes family. Subcommittee members voiced concerns about the purpose of the DCPC with regard to the bulk and scale of the houses, and asked additional questions regarding the scale of the proposed addition in relation to the neighboring community, and raised flooding concerns. r Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 7 of 27 Ms. Jo Anne Miller Buntich, Director of Growth Management for the Town of Barnstable, said that the Town is in agreement with the analysis provided by the staff. She applauded the de- nitrifying system that is proposed, but said that the Town has additional concerns about flows because this is an.area identified by the town for sewering. She questioned the undesignated areas in the proposed addition and raised concerns about flooding. She said the Town concludes that the hardship exemption derogates from the DCPC. Subcommittee members suggested a continuation of the hearing based on the staffs need to review the nitrogen loading calculations, and they requested dramatically scaled-down plans. Public hearing—June 10, 2009 A public hearing was held at 6:00 pm on June 10,2009 at the Cape Cod Commission office. Ms. Senatori presented the staff report. She noted that the project as originally proposed consisted of a three-bedroom addition of approximately 4,276 s.f. on two floors. An exterior deck along the southern side of the addition was also proposed and the septic system's leach field was sited within the Centerville River watershed. She noted the applicant made revisions to the plans and the new proposal now consists of a two-bedroom, 1,931 s.f. addition on one floor. She noted the elimination of the proposed deck and that the applicant moved the septic system leach field outside of the sensitive watershed. She noted that while'the original deadline for the town to adopt its implementing regulations for the DCPC was June 12, 2009, the town requested and received a 90-day extension of this timeframe and the new deadline for adopting the implementing regulations is September 10, 2009. She stated that Commission standards allow for existing structures on barrier beach to be reconstructed or renovated provided there is no increase in floor area, footprint, or intensity of use. Ms. Senatori stated that since the applicant is proposing an increase in footprint, it is not possible for the applicant to meet this standard without a Hardship Exemption. Ms. Senatori also indicated that the applicant worked with the Town of Barnstable and has proposed to place deed restrictions on the property that would include: 1) a view corridor restriction that would prohibit structures within the 30' westerly side yard setback, requiring the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of vegetation; 2) that the house with the proposed addition presents the full build-out of the property; 3) a bedroom restriction limited the residence to a total of 6 bedrooms; and 4) a use restriction limiting the property use to single family residential only which includes no accessory apartments. Ms. Senatori also noted that earlier in the day staff received four letters from abutters to the project in support of the project, and the subcommittee now has those letters. Attorneys Barry Weiner of Ruberto, Israel & Weiner and Eliza Cox of Nutter, McClennen and Fish, presented on behalf of the Applicant. Attorney Weiner respectfully noted that Byron Haseotes passed away on May 25, 2009. He also noted that the Haseotes' hardship is financial and physical. He also noted the unique architecture of the interior of the house and stated that a lot of the interesting design depends on the different levels of living space. He explained that Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 8 of 27 given the disabilities of Mrs. Haseotes, these levels, which are accessible by sets of stairs are, difficult for her to get to. He noted that the family has invested roughly $75,000.on architects, engineers, and lawyers on the assumption the addition would be permitted. He further explained that Mrs. Haseotes was having difficulty navigating the stairs in the house due to heart,hip, and back conditions, which have been getting increasingly worse. Attorney Weiner noted that the proposed addition was consistent with the architecture of the existing house and the size, bulk, and design of surrounding houses. He further explained that the design tried to accommodate concerns expressed by Commission staff and the Town while making the additional bulk as attractive as possible and consistent with existing surroundings as well as reduce it as much as possible while still addressing the Applicant's needs. Attorney Weiner explained that the .proposed addition contains caregiver's accommodations, Mrs. Haseotes' bedroom, a bathroom, a den, a living area, and a mudroom. He explained this provides Mrs. Haseotes with the ability to provide for herself(with caregivers help) and that this space fits her needs without going beyond them. Mr. Weiner reiterated the deed restrictions that were agreed to by the Applicant as identified earlier by Commission staff and also noted the plumbing fixtures in the existing home would be upgraded to low flow fixtures. He stated that this project does not substantially derogate from the intent or purpose of the act. S:Jo Anne Miller Buntich stated that-theTor ginal plans prop sed roughly-an 83%-increase in cstructure-size-and the current plans represent roughly a 38%o increase. She noted this is closer.to the structure-limi--fi oo of" 25/o that the DCPC=regulations might._mcludr She expressed rappreeiat on--for the-deed -restrictions and-fdlther stated that the-town llas-no-opinion on the {`subcormnitfee's ability to find ai-i determine-the-extern of the hardship relied Ms. Heidi Davis, Mrs. Haseotes' eldest daughter, stated that this is a very substantial financial hardship and her mother is not able to navigate through her home and is deteriorating fast. Ms. Davis stated that she currently uses a walker right now and will most likely end up in a wheelchair. Mr. Ari Haseotes, Mr. Haseotes' son, agreed with his sister's previous comments and also noted there has been substantial investment made and he explained that his concern is his mother and he would like the house to be as navigable and user friendly as possible for her. He noted that his mother has a significant heart issue and has gone through numerous procedures that required a defibrillator to get her heart back in rhythm. Mr. Bob Angelo and Mr. Dom Gautrau, two neighboring property owners, testified in support of the project. The subcommittee had questions regarding the expiration of the moratorium,the height of the utility area over the addition, local permitting,the lengthaof the deed restrictions extent of the kitchen in the addition,the goals of the DCPC�, nitrogen.loading and_wastJ ewater fly construction on the barrier beach, the FAST system, and Mrs. Haseotes' needs. Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 9 of 27 The public hearing was continued to the full Commission meeting on July 23, 2009 at 3:00 pm at the First District Courthouse Assembly of Delegates Chamber in Barnstable, Massachusetts for the purpose of accepting further testimony on this Hardship Exemption application. Subcommittee meeting—June 15, 2009 . A subcommittee meeting was held on June 15, 2009. The subcommittee deliberated on whether the Applicant has met her burden of proving a hardship exists, financial or otherwise, and whether the proposed,addition presents a substantial detriment to the public good or nullify or substantially derogate from the intent or purpose of the Cape Cod Commission Act. Attorney Weiner outlined the Applicant's financial hardship and stated that approximately $75,000 was spent on architects, engineers, and legal counsel prior to the DCPC nomination. The subcommittee.had questions for the Applicant regarding Mrs. Haseotes' disabilities and the architecture of the existing residence. Ms. Brookshire rioted that the applicant was both Mr. and Mrs. Haseotes and the emphasis at the time of the application and up until his passing, was on Mr. Haseotes' condition and need for a handicap accessible addition to accommodate his needs. As Mrs. Haseotes is now the sole_ applicant, Ms. Brookshire asked when Mrs. Haseotes' condition deteriorated to the extent that an addition and caretaker was needed to fill her needs. Attorney Weiner explained that Mr. Haseotes' condition was so severe (as he was wheelchair bound) that when the application was filed they chose to focus only on him. He noted that Mrs. Haseotes'.health conditions predate January 2009 by several years and have gotten worse. The subcommittee asked for clarification on the fact that the original plans were not solely to accommodate any physical disabilities but instead appeared to provide more space for family and recreational activities. Attorney Weiner noted he was not part of the project at that point but when he was retained he looked at the plans and realized the addition was roughly 5,000 square feet of space. He explained to the Haseotes family that that he would want to see the addition relate directly to the hardship. The subcommittee had questions and deliberated on the size of the addition and the type of rooms it included, Mrs. Haseotes' medical disabilities, and whether Mrs. Haseotes is capable of self-care. Ms. Davis testified that she has rearranged both her and her small children's lives in order to be on the Cape with her mother this summer. She noted that her mother's heart condition is very severe and precludes her from taking the stairs. She explained that they are working on finding a health care provider who can live in the house with her. Ms. Davis testified that her mother needs assistance with shopping and driving but increasingly needs assistance to bathe. She stated that her mother is able to feed herself and could do the food preparation if everything was accessible. Ms. Davis stated that her mother stopped driving sometime this winter and that technically she still has a license but she doesn't drive at all. Ms. Davis also stated her mother would eventually have a caretaker during the summer months. Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 10 of 27 Mr. Richardson noted that there were six months between when the DCPC nomination was made and when it was recorded at t? registry of deeds. He asked why the Applicant waited so long to file for a Hardship Exemption. Mr. Tolley stated that a substantial amount of work was done before the DCPC was in place. He noted that the original plan was not likely to pass as a Hardship Exemption and he worked with the film Nutter, McClennen, and Fish for six months drawing various plans for the family until one was agreed on. Commission staff noted that the subcommittee has to decide whether a literal enforcement of the act involves a substantial hardship, financial or otherwise and if they find there is a hardship, then they must decide if desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the act. Mr. Weiner noted that he worked with Commission staff to address their concerns. Ms. Brookshire noted that the purpose of the DCPC moratorium is to allow the Town of Barnstable time to create regulations that will protect the natural resources on the barrier beach area and Centerville River. She noted that one concern she has is the issue of community character. Mr. Richardson noted that the house is big to begin with and he would like to see another design for the addition. Mr. Tolley answered that this is the fifteenth version of the plans for the addition and that nine iterations came as a result of feedback from the Connnission. He explained th-at if-the 17ardship-were approved today he would have difficulty_getting petmits by Se tember_1.0, 2009 when the-D-CPC mplementing`regulations_ar.e enabled. Mr. Putnam stated that he is not convinced a hardship exists, however he is very sympathetic to the Haseotes family. Mr. Putnam stated that the only question they need to answer is if there is a hardship as defined by the regulations. He stated that he does not think that there is. Mr. Richardson stated that based on the testimony from Ms. Davis,Mrs. Haseotes' health is declining and if no action is taken now more significant action may need to be taken later. He stated that he believes there is a hardship. Mr. Richardson stated that Mrs. Haseotes' condition is creating the hardship and granting the project by allowing the creation of a handicapped accessible addition would be the relief necessary to address it. Ms. Brookshire stated she believes there is a hardship as well but wasn't sure if it was substantial enough to override the DCPC moratorium two weeks before the moratorium expires. Ms. Brookshire stated she wished she could hear testimony from Mrs. Haseotes or a doctor's report on Mrs. Haseotes.. Ms. Brookshire stated that she had reservations about voting today and would like a doctor's report that would help convince her this hardship is so substantial that the applicant can't wait until the DCPC moratorium ends. She noted that this is a very emotional issue that will have to be decided based on the facts and testimony presented. She stated she would like to vote without having any reservations and be able to explain her position in good faith to the Town. She reiterated in order to feel this way she will need to see a doctor's report. Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 11 of 27 Mr. Weiner answered that he will provide one. Mr. Weiner asked Mr. Putnam if a physician's letter, which documents Mrs..Haseotes' condition in terms of the physical nature of the hardship, would help him change his opinion. Mr. Putnam stated it would interest him and depending on what it says it could persuade him. Subcommittee meeting—June 25, 2009 After receiving a letter from Mrs. Haseotes' physician, a subcommittee meeting was held on June 25, 2009. At that meeting,the subcommittee deliberated on whether the Applicant has met its burden of proving a hardship exists by virtue of the DCPC moratorium. Ms. Brookshire,stated that she feels there is both afinancial and an `otherwise' hardship. She noted that the Applicant spent $75,000 based on the assumption that the addition could be built. She noted the original plans depicted an addition that deviated from the purpose of the hardship request; to make a livable, year round addition for first Mr. Haseotes and now Mrs. Haseotes. She also noted that many revisions of the plans have been made, and the square footage has decreased dramatically from approximately 4,200 s.f. to 1,937 s.f. as a result of cooperation between the Applicant, staff, and Town. She also noted the legal, architectural and engineering expenses that the Applicant has incurred and the fact that the architect stated that nine plans out of the fifteen different versions for the addition came as a result of Commission staff input. She stated that the financial hardship was created in part, due to the willingness of the Haseotes family to take the concerns of the Town, Commission staff, and subcommittee into consideration. She noted she believes there is both a financial and physical hardship. Ms. Brookshire moved that a financial hardship exists. Mr. Putnam seconded the motion for discussion purposes. Ms. Brookshire noted that if the subcommittee finds there is no financial hardship, then the $75,000 that has already been expended on the project would be for naught. Ms. Brookshire stated she believes it qualifies as a financial hardship. Mr. Putnam noted that the Applicant's expenditures were made at their discretion and that they were not forced to make them. He stated that it is not a financial hardship as they spent the money because they wanted to, not because they had to. Mr. Putnam stated that the judgments made to spend the money were made before the Commission was involved and that the expenditures were made on a voluntary basis. Mr. Richardson said he also believes that.losing $75,000 is a hardship. Ms. Brookshire called for a vote that there is a financial hardship. The motion passed with two in favor and Mr. Putnam opposed. Ms. Brookshire noted that§23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act states a hardship can be financial or otherwise. She stated she would like to discuss the `otherwise' aspect of this hardship. Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 12 of 27 Ms. Brookshire read the testimony from Ari Haseotes on page seven of the June 10, 2009 minutes, "He explained his concern is his mother and he would like the house to be as navigable and user friendly as possible for her. He noted that his mother has a significant heart issue and has gone through numerous procedures that required a defibrillator to get her heart back in rhythm." Mr. Richardson moved to adopt this verbal testimony as a finding that Mrs. Haseotes has a physical hardship, and Ms. Brookshire seconded the motion. The motion passed with Mr. Richardson and Ms. Brookshire voting in support of the motion and Mr. Putnam voting in opposition. Ms. Brookshire read the testimony from on page seven of the June 10, 2009 minutes, "Ms. Heidi Davis noted she was Mrs. Haseotes' eldest daughter. She explained she was here to reinforce Mr. Weiner's comments that this is a very substantial financial hardship. She also noted her mother is not able to navigate through her home and is deteriorating fast." Ms. Brookshire noted the subcommittee received a letter from Eric Weber, M.D., Mrs. Haseotes' physician, dated June 16, 2009 discussing Mrs. Haseotes' physical capabilities. Mr. Richardson moved to adopt the verbal testimony of Ms. Davis and written testimony of Eric Weber M.D. as findings that a physical hardship exists, and Mr. Putnam seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Ms. Brookshire stated that the design of the house is extremely difficult for Mrs. Haseotes to navigate, as there are many different levels of living space. She stated due to the houses unique design, it would be extremely detrimental to gut the inside and renovate it in order to be more wheelchair accessible. Mr. Putnam noted Mrs. Haseotes doesn't currently need a wheelchair, and she could ambulate on a ramp that could be installed in the existing house. Mr. Weiner stated given the steepness of the ramp, getting up or down would cause problems for Mrs. Haseotes. He noted the letter from the Doctor suggested the current plans fill all of Mrs. Haseotes' present and future needs. Mr. Richardson noted Mrs. Haseotes is very ill and if the Doctor stated Mrs. Haseotes needs these accommodations they should vote on the issue and move on. Mr. Richardson moved that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the applicant. Mr. Putman seconded the motion for discussion purposes. The motion passed with Ms. Brookshire and Mr. Richardson voting in support of the motion and Mr. Putnam voting in opposition of the motion. Mr. Richardson made a motion that the desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the act. Ms. Brookshire seconded the motion and the motion passed with Mr. Richardson and Ms. Brookshire voting in support of the motion, and Mr. Putnam opposed. Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 13 of 27 Ms. Brookshire noted the subcommittee has received written testimony from abutters and oral i testimony from Mr. Bob Angelo and Mr. Dom Gautrau in support of the project. She reiterated the subcommittee should also consider testimony from the family and from Mrs. Haseotes' doctor. She noted the project will not contribute nitrogen to the Centerville river watershed and that most of the MPS have been met. Ms. Brookshire noted that a concern is the fact the house is increasing its footprint on a barrier beach. She stated that by approving the hardship, the subcommittee is saying the Applicant has met the MPSs to the maximum extent feasible and that the addition is absolutely necessary for Mrs. Haseotes to continue living in her house. Mr. Putnam stated the project does not conform to the intent of the Act. He stated that it is increasing the size of a building that is located on a barrier beach, in direct conflict with MPS 2.2.2.3. Ms. Brookshire noted that moving the septic system outside of the Centerville river watershed is an overall improvement to the recharge area of the watershed. She stated that the FAST system would also decrease the nitrogen load. Ms. Brookshire noted that the area is mapped as Endangered Species Habitat, however any concerns they had could be addressed at the local level. She noted that the DCPC purpose is partially to protect and preserve the waterfront and the shoreline from inappropriate use. She noted the land is a FEMA mapped A-zone. She noted that the house is designed to have an elevation of 12 feet, one foot higher than necessary, and that the new addition will be on pilings to protect it in the case of a flood. She noted that Community Character was originally a concern, however the size of the house had decreased substantially and that the view corridor has increased and will remain as such through the deed restriction. She noted that the house is increasing the footprint on a barrier beach but that the subcommittee could vote that it was the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship. Ms. Brookshire stated she was looking for a motion to adopt her statements as findings as she just outlined. Mr. Richardson made the motion. Mr. Putnam seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Richardson moved to adopt the deed restrictions on page eight of the staff report as a condition to the decision. Mr. Richardson identified the deed restrictions as: 1) a view corridor restriction that would prohibit structures within the 30' westerly side yard setback; require the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of the vegetation(subject to and in accordance with Conservation Commission approval); 2)the house with the proposed addition represents full build-out on the property (no further expansions, additions or changes to the bulk of the structure) 3); a bedroom restriction; and 4)the use would be restricted to single family only; no accessory apartments. Mr. Putnam seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Mr. Richardson moved that the relief granted relates directly to the nature of the hardship and is the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship and that the Applicant has shown that a Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 14 of 27 hardship exists. Ms. Brookshire seconded the motion. The motion passed with Mr..Richardson and Ms. Brookshire voting in support, and Mr. Putnam opposed. Mr. Putnam stated he was voting in opposition of the project for three reasons. The first being he does not believe a hardship exists, the second being it is not the minimum relief that can be granted to allow her to live in her home, and the third being it does not support the purposes of the DCPC. Mr. Richardson moved to direct staff to draft a decision approving the hardship with conditions, which will include the testimony and findings and conditions as discussed today. Mr. Putnam seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Subcommittee meeting—July 14,2009 On July 14, 2009, the subcommittee met to review the draft decision. Ms. Senatori reviewed the draft decision and ran through a brief summary of the project, the procedural history, materials submitted for the record, testimony from the public hearings and subcommittee meetings, Cape Cod Commission jurisdiction over the project, and the standard of review for the project, which includes §23 of the Act, the standard for hardship exemptions. She reviewed each individual general, natural resource, community character, and coastal resource finding. She stated that at the June 25, 2009 public meeting, the subcommittee found that the Applicant fulfilled the burden of showing that the DCPC moratorium had created a hardship. She noted that the subcommittee found that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve waiting until after the DCPC regulations are drafted in September 2009 to permit and construct the addition. She stated that at the June 25, 2009 meeting, the subcommittee found that relief from this requirement may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Act, and that the relief being granted relates directly to the nature of the identified hardship and is the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship. She noted that all of this was substantiated in the findings of the decision as she previously outlined. She noted that the decision approves the project with conditions and reviewed each of the general conditions. She noted that general condition number five places the following deed restrictions on the property: a view corridor restriction prohibiting structures within the 30' westerly side yard setback, and requiring the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of the vegetation (subject to and in accordance with approval by local boards); that the house with the proposed addition represents full build-out on the property (no further expansions, additions or changes to the bulk of the structure); a bedroom restriction limiting the total number of bedrooms within the existing house and addition to six; and the use of the residence and property is restricted to single-family use only; including, but not limited to, prohibiting accessory apartments. She continued to review with the subcommittee each of the water resources conditions, community character conditions, and coastal resources conditions. Ms. Brookshire stated that previously, JoAnne Miller-Buntich (Interim Director of Growth Management for the Town of Barnstable) had concerns with the roof height of the addition. She noted that Ms. Buntich wanted to see the roof height slightly decreased. She stated that the Applicant's architect previously explained to the subcommittee why decreasing the roof height Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 15 of 27 1 . isn't feasible, as space is needed for mechanical equipment and ductwork. She stated that she would like testimony from the architect adopted as a finding. Mr. Richardson agreed. Ms. Senatori stated she would amend the draft decision accordingly. Ms. Cox added that this testimony was presented during the July 10, 2009 public hearing and at the June 1.5, 2009 subcommittee meeting. Ms. Wielgus suggested that this be added to general finding 14, which adopts other testimony from the architect. Mr. Putnam stated.he has no concerns with the draft decision but disagrees with the approval of the project. Mr. Richardson made a motion to adopt the decision as amended, approving with conditions the hardship exemption application of Joyce Haseotes. Mr. Putnam seconded the motion and the motion passed with Mr. Richardson and Ms. Brookshire voting in support and Mr. Putnam voting in opposition. Ms. Brookshire stated she was.looking for a motion to forward the draft decision, as amended,to the full Commission for the July 23, 2009 meeting. Mr. Richardson made the motion, and Mr. Putnam seconded it. The motion passed unanimously. . JURISDICTION The-Site-is-located-within the-Craigvlle'Bea`ch DCPC,which is_an-area that i_s-curr-ently s-ubject_---- to a building_permit moratorium:The-purpose-of the-n orator-ium is to-all w the town to�dev- lop implementing regulations that will be applicable to the area and protect the resources identified`' in the nomination process. In accordance with Section 11(c) of the Act,the power of a municipality to grant development permits is suspended until the implementing regulations are effective. However, during the moratorium,the Act allows a municipality to grant a development permit "for development within the district if- (t) the commission has certified in its acceptance of the nomination that the type or class of proposed development is not substantially detrimental to public health, safety or . general welfare and does not contravene the purposes of this act and a development by-law or by-laws had been in effect immediately prior to the nomination of such areas and development permits could have been granted until the by-laws; or (2) a development has received approval as a development of regional impact within the seven year period next preceding the nomination of the geographic area in which said development is located, in whole or in part and such approval is still valid; or (3) a development of regional impact has been referred to the commission for review prior to the first published notice of the nomination of a district of critical planning Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 16 of 27 concern in which said development is located, in whole or in part, and subsequently is approved; or (4) a development is authorized by a development agreement which has been approved by the commission and the relevant municipality or municipalities; or (5) the commission has not expressly found in accepting a nomination that the issuance of development permits for a single-family house or houses on lots held in conumon ownership or on lots in separate ownership may be substantially detrimental to the protection of the public health, safety and welfare or in light of the factors specified in clauses (1) and (2) of subsection (a) of section ten,might contravene the purposes of this act." The proposed development does not fall into any of these exceptions provided by the Act. When the DCPC was created, the Cape Cod Commission issued a DCPC Acceptance Decision dated February 21, 2008 (the "Decision") that described the resources and provided guidelines for the future implementing regulations. The Decision states "[t]he Commission further finds that in accepting the nomination of the DCPC that the issuance of development permits for a single-family home...may be substantially detrimental to the protection of the public health, safety and welfare...including...the presence of significant natural, coastal,water cultural, architectural, historic resources and...might contravene the purposes of the Act." Furthermore,the Decision lists development allowed to continue during the DCPC moratorium. Included in this list is "[n]ormal and customary repair or maintenance to a single-family home as determined by the Barnstable Building Commissioner. Such repair shall not increase the number of bedrooms or wastewater disposal capacity or result in an increase in impervious area and"[n]ormal and customary repair or maintenance to existing open air decks without structural or other cover that are not entirely impervious and does not increase decked area." The Decision states "[p]ursuant to Section I l(c) of the Cape Cod Commission Act, `the acceptance of a nomination for consideration for designation as a district of critical planning concern shall continue to suspend the power of a municipality to grant development permits for development within the nominating district...."' In accordance with the Decision, an applicant may apply for a hardship exemption for "any development that can demonstrate that suspension of action on a local development permit application during the limited moratorium constitutes a substantial hardship." Further, "[h]ardship applications will be heard by the Cape Cod Commission...in accordance with Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act." Section 23 of the Act states that the Commission may "grant an exemption, in whole or in part and with appropriate conditions...where the commission specifically finds that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the applicant and that desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the act." Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 17 of 27 The intent/purpose of the Commission Act in allowing for a moratorium while implementing regulations are being developed for a DCPC is to provide a"time out" for development for an identified area so that implementing regulations may be developed. The intent of the Act in developing a Regional Policy Plan is to "present a coherent set of regional planning policies and objectives to guide development...to protect the region's resources, which shall reflect and reinforce the goals and purposes set out in section one." (Commission Act §7) One of the goals and purposes of Section One is the preservation of coastal resources. The planning section of the coastal resources section of the RPP identifies that an"important is factoring consideration for coastal floodplam managementg relative sea-level rise into development projects." A specific goal of the DCPC decision is to "preserve.and enhance flood hazard protected provided by the barrier beach, estuarine and tidal marsh systems for coastal properties in the Craigville Beach District." One of the main issues identified by both the Act and this DCPC itself is the concern of development upon a barrier beach. These interests must be weighed against the standards for a Hardship Exemption, which is the only exception provided from this moratorium of the Craigville DCPC as outlined in the DCPC decision. As such, the Enabling Regulations governing the Hardship process must be applied. The Enabling Regulations in its requirements in allowing a Hardship Exemption directs that compliance with the RPP to'the"maximum extent feasible is required. Additionally, the Commission's Enabling Regulations state "Projects should comply to the maximum extent feasible with the Minimum Performance Standards of the Regional Policy Plan (RPP). Any relief granted from the requirements of the Minimum Performance Standards shall relate directly to the nature of the identified hardship and shall be the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship." The Commission must consider the purposes of the Act, which includes protection of coastal, natural, historic, architectural, cultural values and the purpose of the preservation of coastal resources, the protection of groundwater, surface water and ocean water quality,as well as other natural resources of Cape Cod, as well as the preservation of historic, cultural, archeological, architectural and other recreational values. In order to determine whether relief could be granted without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent/purpose of the Act, the Commission must also consider the intent of the Act in developing a Regional Policy Plan as well as the intent of the DCPC itself. The purpose of regulating development in the barrier beach area as identified in the Craigville DCPC decision is to protect natural resources including the barrier beach, prevention of flood damage, protection of public health and safety, reduction of risk to people, property and municipal safety and from storm surge and sea rise. FINDINGS Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition_Hardship Exemption Page 18 of 27 The Commission has considered the application of Joyce Haseotes, and based on consideration of such.application and upon the information presented at the public hearings and submitted for the record, snakes the following findings pursuant to Section 23 of the Act: General Findings: GF 1. The Commission finds that the Applicant is Joyce Haseotes. The Hardship Exemption application was submitted naming both Byron and Joyce Haseotes as joint Applicants. However, Byron Haseotes passed away on May 25, 2009, during the timeframe of the review of this application. GF2. As the first substantive hearing was held on January 13, 2009, the RPP in effect at this time is the 2002 RPP. GF3. The Site consists of 0.66 acre at 293 Long Beach Road in Centerville identified by the Town of Barnstable as Assessor's Map 185 Parcel 34. A 5,150 s.£_residence,Aconstructed in 1929 and owned by Byron and Joyce Haseotes, is currently on the site. GF4. The addition is proposed in accordance with the following plans, which are attached to this decision as Exhibit A: • Proposed Conditions for: The Haseotes Family, prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. of Yarmouthport,MA, and dated June 4, 2009 o Sheet No. A-1 Proposed Exterior Elevations (Exhibit A-1) o Sheet No. A-2 Proposed First Floor Plan (Exhibit A-2) • Septic System Design plan, prepared by P.M.P Associates of East Bridgewater, MA, and dated April 27, 2007 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009 (Exhibit A- 3 • High Strength Fast 1.0 Septic System Design Details plan, prepared by P.M.P Associates of East Bridgewater, MA, and dated December 11, 2008 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009 (Exhibit A-4) GF5. The Commission finds that the purpose of the Craigville Beach DCPC as stated in the Commission's Acceptance of DCPC Nomination Decision dated February 21, 2008, is to address redevelopment concerns in the Craigville Beach District by allowing the town to plan and adopt zoning strategies that will provide additional protections to guide redevelopment in a way that contributes to and respects the character and historic development patterns of the area,protects natural resources including but not limited to the barrier beach, groundwater and coastal water quality,prevents flood damage,protects public health and safety and reduces the risk to people, property and municipal safety personnel from storm damage and relative sea level rise. The Commission's Acceptance of DCPC Nomination Decision states "[t]he Commission further finds that in accepting the nomination of the DCPC that the issuance of development permits for a single-family home...may be substantially detrimental to the protection of the public health, safety and welfare...including...the presence of significant natural, coastal, water cultural, architectural, historic resources and...might contravene the purposes of the Act." Furthermore, the Decision lists development Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 19 of 27 allowed to continue during the DCPC moratorium. Included in this list is "[n]ormal and customary repair or maintenance to a single-family home as determined by the Barnstable Building Commissioner. Such repair shall not increase the number of bedrooms or wastewater disposal capacity or result in an increase in impervious area" and"[n]ormal and customary repair or maintenance to existing open air decks without structural or other cover that are not entirely impervious and does not increase decked area." GF6. The following chronology of events describes the important milestones in the DCPC process and includes key dates associated with the Applicant's project: September 14, 1987 Applicant: All Cape Engineering prepared"Sketch Plan of Land" December 15, 1992 Applicant: Taylor Design Associates prepared Revision-A site plan "for conservation" December 9, 2006 Applicant: Mike Perrault prepared Site Plan identified as "Preliminary Plans for: Byron& Joyce Haseotes" April 27, 2007 Applicant: P.M.P. Associates, LLC prepare "Septic System Design" plan February 12, 2008 DCPC: First Nomination received for Craigville Beach and Centerville Village area DCPC February 15, 2008 DCPC: Notice of Nomination consideration—starts full moratorium February 21, 2008 DCPC: DCPC nomination accepted by the Commission, full moratorium ended, limited moratorium began April 3, 2008 DCPC: Commission voted to forward to Assembly of Delegates for designation as a DCPC April 11, 2008 Applicant: Division of Fisheries and Wildlife correspondence May 21, 2008 DCPC:Assembly of Delegates approves DCPC ordinance June 4, 2008 DCPC: County Commissioners approved June 13, 2008 DCPC: DCPC ordinance recorded at the Registry of Deeds September 23, 2008 Applicant: ERT Architects, Inc. prepared"Proposed Conditions" plans October 14, 2008 Applicant: Submission of Project Notification Form to the Massachusetts Historical Society December 18, 2009 Applicant: Hardship Exemption application complete April 15, 2009 Applicant: Submitted revised plans and materials to the Commission June 3-8, 2009 Applicant: Submitted revised plans and materials to the Commission June 12, 2009 DCPC: One year to complete implementing regulations September 10, 2009 DCPC: 90-day extension to complete implementing regulations GF7. The Commission finds that the existing residence totals 5,150 s.f. (3,370 s.f. on the first floor and 1,792 s.f. on the second floor). The Applicant proposes a 1,937 s.f. one -floor addition to the existing residence. Hardship relief is sought to allow for the issuance of local permits for this addition during the Craigville Beach DCPC moratorium. GFIfTh-t-Ceommission finds-that the-Applicant has.agreed-to-placeTtheTfollowing,_ esrictions in perpetupon the property(as outlined in GC6):-----_� 1) A view corridor restriction prohibiting structures within the 30' westerly side yard setback, and requiring the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of the vegetation (subject to and in accordance with approval by local boards); Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 20 of 27 2) That the house with the proposed addition represents full.build-out on the property (no further expansions, additions or changes to the bulk of the structure); 3).-A_bedr-oorrrrestrict on Iimiting the total number-of bedraoms-witliiirthe existing-house and addition to six_(6),andr 4)The use of the residence and property is restricted to single-family use only; including, but not limited to, prohibiting accessory apartments. GF9. The Commission adopts the testimony of the Applicant's counsel and finds that the Applicant expended approximately $75,000 on attorney's fees, engineers, and architects for the proposed addition plans prior to the DCPC moratorium. GF 10. The Commission adopts the oral testimony of Ari Haseotes and finds that the Applicant has a significant heart issue and has gone through numerous procedures that required a defibrillator to get her heart back in rhythm. GF11. The Commission adopts the oral testimony of Heidi Davis and finds that the Applicant is not able to navigate through her home, that she is physically deteriorating fast,that she currently uses a walker, and that she will likely need a wheelchair soon. GF 12., The Commission adopts the written testimony of Dr. Eric Weber, Mrs. Haseotes' . physician,,and finds that Mrs. Haseotes has a heart condition, an arthritic hip, and back issues. The Commission further finds based on Dr. Weber's testimony, that Mrs. Haseotes needs to avoid stairs, she must reduce her daily activities, and she must bring in help to assist her with basic functions, including cooking, bathing, cleaning, and driving. Additionally, based on Dr. Weber's testimony, the Commission finds that given Mrs. Haseotes' present limitations and the difficulties posed by the existing multi-level house, new living space on one floor and a live-in caregiver are immediate needs of Mrs. Haseotes. Finally,the Commission finds based on Dr. Weber's testimony, that the proposed addition represents a direct and necessary response to Mrs. Haseotes' physical limitations and requirements. GF13. The Commission adopts the testimony of Erik Tolley, the Applicant's architect, and finds that the unique architecture and multiple levels of living space in the existing residence prohibit its renovation or rehabilitation to provide for handicapped-accessible living areas. Additionally, the Commission adopts the testimony of Mr. Tolley and finds that the need to house the duct work, mechanical equipment, and electrical equipment in the attic space above the addition prohibits a decrease in the roof height. GF14. The Commission finds that based on written and oral testimony,that six abutters and/or neighboring property owners support the project. GF15The Commssionadopts the testimony of Michael-Perr-ault;the-Applicant'-s-engineer;and C ----finds tliat the project will-not contr-ibute-nitrogen tothe-Centerville-River watershed, which is-an impaired wate rhed.� GF16:-B_y_virtue of the addition, the-Commission.frnds that the-project-does_not,meet;MPS, fl—2:2:2 3;which-allows.existing str_uctur_es on barrier beaches of coastal dunes to bed Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 21 of 27 reconstructed or renovated,provided there_is no increase in floor�area,:footprnt, or riteil'sity of use:"' 7 GF 17. The Commission finds that the Applicant requires wheelchair-accessible living space, caretaker's quarters, and a reasonable connection to the existing residence. The Comi-nission finds the proposed 1,937 s.f one-floor plan is the minimum relief necessary to accommodate Mrs. Haseotes' disabilities. GF18. Based on Finding GF9,the Commission finds that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve substantial financial hardship. The Commission further finds that the Applicant has fulfilled its burden to demonstrate a financial hardship exists. GF 19. Based on Findings GF 10 through GF 13, the Commission finds that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve substantial "otherwise"hardship. The Commission further finds that the Applicant has fulfilled its burden to demonstrate that an"otherwise"hardship exists. GF20. The Commission finds that relief from the moratorium may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Act. GF21. The Commission finds that the project complies to the maximum extent feasible with the Minimum Performance Standards of the Regional Policy Plan. GF22. Based on Findings GF16 through GF17, the Commission finds that the relief granted from the requirements of the Minimum Performance Standards relates directly to the nature of the identified hardship and is the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship. Water Resources Findings: WRF1. The Commission finds that the Town of Barnstable has identified the District in its Comprehensive Wastewater Management.Plan as a priority area for a sewage-collection system. A goal of the DCPC ordinance is to provide the Town of Barnstable with an opportunity to develop regulations protective of water quality and to evaluate sewer- neutral policy options for the District. WRF2, Commission-finds that the pro_ectTwrll expand anexisting Home resulting in two+(2) riew-bedr�o_s.Tlie Appl canf has agreed to record a deed restriction with the Town of, B-arnstable th&bby restricting the number of bedrooms�to-six (6)and effectively l_uniti g a Title-5 wastewater flows_to_660-gallons-per-day(gpd).�J WRF3. The Applicant has agreed to refit the house's entire plumbing system with low-flow fixtures. The Commission finds that these measures will limit wastewater flows, consistent with a goal of the DCPC ordinance to provide the Town of Barnstable with an opportunity to evaluate sewer-neutral policy options for the District. Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 22 of 27 WRF4. The Commission finds that the project will result in a net reduction in nitrogen load to groundwater and thereby meets MPS 5.1 which requires development and redevelopment to maintain or improve water quality where existing development exceeds an identified nitrogen-loading standard or where there are documented marine water quality problems. The net reduction in nitrogen load to groundwater will be achieved through use of a FAST@ denitrifying septic system. Based on Technical Bulletin 91-001, the project will result in a nitrogen loading concentration of 5.6 milligrams per liter (mg-N/L or ppm-N). WRF5. The Commission finds that the project meets RPP MPS 3.1, which requires development to meet critical nitrogen limits for nitrogen-sensitive estuaries. The-prooje;t s te-straddles the-Centerville'River watershed boundary-shown-on RPP Wafe `Resource-Map-II and'. ,,-delinea� ty ed by the Massachusetts Estuaries Project a collaborative program that provides technical support to MADEP as it implements provisions of the Clean Water Act. The northwest corner of the site drains to the Centerville River, a nitrogen-sensitive estuary for which a Total Maximum Daily Load for nitrogen has been approved by USEPA. The proposed expansion of the house will occur outside the Centerville River watershed, in an area that drains to Nantucket Sound. The project will replace an existing cesspool on the south(Nantucket Sound) side of the house with a FASTO system proposed for the north (Centerville River) side of the House and the septic layout plan was modified on March 30, 2009 to shift the septic soil absorption system (SAS) from the Centerville River watershed. Natural Resources Findings: NRF I. The Commission.finds that the property is locatedJin a Significant Natural-Resource Area, wetland resource areas, and a Riverfront Alea.•+The site is also located on Long Beach,a barrier beach, the coastal beach portion of which is mapped as endangered species habitat. NRF2. The Commission finds that the project has components that will require review and consideration by local boards for consistency with state acid local wetland regulations,but that due to the nature of the actual area to be developed and the project's proximity to other development, impacts of regional significance to natural habitat resources are not anticipated. Community Character Findings: CCFl. The Commission finds that the Craigville Beach DCPC was created primarily out of response to out-of-scale development of single-family homes. When the DCPC was designated by the Assembly of Delegates, it noted the threat posed by the siting and massing of redeveloped residences, which could affect the historic character of the area, and eliminate viewsheds to Nantucket Sound. To address these concerns about building bulk, neighborhood scale, and views to the water, the town is developing new regulations for the area. CCF2. The proposed project involves an addition to an existing waterfront residence on Long Beach Road. The Commission finds that although the proposed addition represents an Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 23 of 27 increase in building mass and building footprint, it is in keeping with the scale and height of buildings in the neighborhood. CCF3. The existing residence is approximately 75 feet wide, spanning roughly half of the 150- wide lot. The Commission finds that the proposed addition would span over approximately 38 feet, leaving an approximately 30=foot wide open area on the west side of the lot. The Applicant has agreed to a deed restriction that would prohibit structures within the 30-foot westerly side yard setback and require the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of the vegetation in this area, maintaining an open view across the property to the water. Coastal Resources Findings: CRF lTl e Commiss� ion_finds that the pip is located entirely within Land:Subject to_Coastal Storm Flowage, is FENIAm m apped-A-Zone;and the-enti-r-e-parcel-is-designated-as barrier beach. CRF2. RPP MPS 2.2.2.2 requires elevation of a structure in an A-zone to accommodate for sea level rise rates of one foot over the next 100 years. The Commission finds that the Applicant has committed to constructing the addition with the lowest member of the structure having an elevation of at least'l2-feet NGVD;in accordance with plans entitled Proposed Conditions for: The Haseotes Family, Sheet No. A-1 Proposed Exterior Elevations, prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. of Yarmouthport,MA, and dated June 4, 2009. CRF3. The Commission finds that the addition will be on piers, there will not be vegetated mounds around the addition, and that the latticework around the piers will allow floodwaters to freely flow under the addition and will be designed in a manner that would break away during a severe storm event. CRF4. RPP MPS 2.2.2.3 requires that existing structures on barrier beach may be reconstructed or renovated"provided there is'no in floor area, footprint, or intensity of use." The Commission finds that by virtue of the addition, the Applicant does not meet this standard. However, the Commission further finds that relief from this standard is the minimum relief necessary. Based on the findings above,the Commission hereby concludes: 1) The Applicant has fulfilled its burden to show that the DCPC moratorium creates a hardship. A literal enforcement of the provisions of the.Act would involve waiting until ' after the DCPC regulations are drafted in September 2009 to permit and construct the addition. Relief from this requirement may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Act. The relief granted relates directly to the nature of the identified hardship and is the minmum relief necessary to address the hardship. The Cape Cod Coemiesion hereby approves w- ith conditions the Hard'slfip Exemption application of Joyce Haseotes, provided the fo'll ng conditions-ar-e-met:__3 Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 24 of 27 1 CONDITIONS General Conditions: GC1. The addition shall be constructed in accordance with the following plans, which are attached to this decision as Exhibit A: • Proposed Conditions for: The Haseotes Family, prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. of Yarmouthport, MA, and dated June 4, 2009 o Sheet No. A-1 Proposed Exterior Elevations (Exhibit A-1) o Sheet No._At2-Proposed First Floor Plan (Exhibit A-2) Septic System Design plan prepared by P�M.PP Associates of East Bridgewater, MA, and dated April 27, 2007Qth_latest revision dated June_2,:2909 (Ual itA� • High Strength Fast 1.0 Septic System Design Details plan, prepared by P.M.P Associates of East Bridgewater, MA, and dated December 11, 2008 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009 (Exhibit A-4) Any deviation from the above plans shall require approval by the Commission through a modification of this decision, pursuant to the Modifications section of the Commission's Enabling Regulations. The Applicant shall submit to the Commission any additional information deemed necessary to evaluate any modifications to the approved plans. GC2. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this decision. GC3. No development work, as the term "development" is defined in the Act, shall be undertaken until all appeal periods have elapsed or, if such an appeal has been filed, until all judicial proceedings have been completed. GC4. The Applicant agrees to allow Commission staff to enter onto the property, which is the subject of this decision at reasonable times and after reasonable notice for the purpose of determining whether the conditions contained in the decision are met. GCS. The Applicant shall place the following deed restrictions in perpetuity upon the property: 1) A view corridor restriction prohibiting structures within the 30' westerly side yard setback, and requiring the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of the vegetation (subject to and in accordance with approval by local boards); 2) That the house with the proposed addition represents full build-out on the property (no further expansions, additions or changes to the bulk of the structure); -r- )-A bedroomo rresorictlon limiting he total number of bedrooms-withinrthe existing-i uo1 se C ::Zand-addition to six(6), and 4)—The'use of th Bence_and-property.is zestr-icted.to single-famrly-use only; including, r—butiiot lu`nited`to,,prohibiting accessory apartme�ts.� Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 25 of 27 Prior to a full Commission vote on the Hardship Exemption application, the Applicant shall submit copies of the draft deed restrictions to Commission staff and Town of Barnstable counsel for review and approval. Prior to obtaining a building permit for the addition, the Applicant shall provide copies of the recorded deed restrictions to Commission staff and the Director of Growth Management for the Town of Barnstable. GC6. After the completion of construction for the project, the Applicant shall obtain a Final Certificate of Compliance from the Commission, which states that all conditions in this decision pertaining to the project have been met. Water Resources Conditions: WRC1. The Applicant shall limit Title 5 wastewater flows to 660 gallons per day. WRC2. The Applicant shall refit the house's entire plumbing system with low-flow fixtures. WRC3. The.Applicant shall install a FAST® denitrifying septic system as shown on Septic System Design plan, prepared by P.M.P Associates of East Bridgewater, MA(dated April 27, 2007 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009) and in accordance with the High Strength Fast 1.0 Septic System Design Details plan, prepared by P.M.P Associates (dated December 11, 2008 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009). The soil absorption system shall be located outside the Centerville River watershed mapped as described in WRF5. ;WRC� The_.Applicant-shall r-emove:or_fill�and�dsconnect..the-existing:cesspool on the south side � �f the House. � �1 Community Character Conditions: CCC1. In accordance with Sheet No. A-1 Proposed Exterior Elevations, prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. of Yarmouthport, MA, and dated June 4, 2009, the maximum height of the addition shall be no higher than 23 feet 9 inches as measured from the ground to the highest roof peak. CCC2. The addition shall be constructed in accordance with Sheet No. A-2 Proposed First Floor Plan, prepared by ERT Architects,Inc. of Yarmouthport, MA, and dated June 4, 2009, which shows that the addition will provide living area only on the first floor, and no additional deck area shall be constructed. Coastal Resources Conditions: CRC1. The Applicant shall construct the addition with the lowest member of the structure having an elevation of at least 12 feet NGVD. CRC2. The Applicant shall construct the addition on piers and the latticework around the piers shall allow floodwaters to freely flow under the addition and shall be designed in a manner that would break away during a severe storm event. The Applicant shall not construct vegetated mounds around the addition. Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 26 of 27 The Cape Cod Commission hereby approves the application of Joyce Haseotes as a Hardship Exemption from the Craigville Beach DCPC pursuant to Section 23 of the Act, c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended. &� jJoD. Harris, Chair J Date COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Barnstable,ss kly A 3 , 2009 Before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared" , ii��lher capacity as Chairman of the Cape Cod Commission, whose name is signed on the preceding document, and such person acknowledged to me tha he/& signed such document voluntarily .for its stated purpose. The identity of such person was proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was U photographic identification with signature issued by a federal or state governmental agency, L] oath or affirmation of a credible witness, or personal knowledge of the undersigned. /1 Notary Public My Commission Expires: / lc�, i3: it Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 27 of 27 r Exhibit A-1 ER 1 s w• Tg _.-__. __._._.-...._. __..__. _ - ARCHI'IBCTS,INC YARNW WP T.NA o2075 Elm (MO)302-8883 _ - _ �� PeovoseDmrmmone LlU zV+.F�...-i•'"�.'C�-=':`-_P."'^ .��i i �•F N .s_.a Mf). � _ . . _ II'SE HA$EOTE$ AMII.Y 29e LONG HF CH ROAD PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION - ���[�.IAA PROPOSED RIOHT ELEVATION P—r a O.O:ov O o Pu¢cr no vn°nA oe,a. o occrssrsfr PROPOSHD LBFT HLEVATION ® ._ C ly T,'AICI Itr�i[fT��uTll_�-1P roses nary m@xssf norto. r 4 !-�enlfrlIM In] . a Pasm '� �„f rotAl mnB@ Of SRffT2 h S S ACCO IN �xILSOOWAMCO BY PROPOSID REAR ELEVATION OMP—sc*of Exhibit A-2 ERT ARCT ECTS,INC. 947 ROUTE BA UNIT 5 PO Box 3 TARMOUTHPORT,MA 01975 Id(50a)381-813 1.(10.)]6]-4900 - raoewao mrmmona fOP: CR � A THE HASEOTES FAMILY k N F CH ROAD 1v N O B CEMBRVRLR,hIA S ' SQUARE FOOTAGE BREAKDOWNS DIN EXISTING: NEW _ 1ST FLOOR GROSS: 3,370 IF ROOM 2ND FLOOR GROSS. 2 IF ©� F„ f _ � i 79 _ OMB: BEDo INITIAL CONCEPT: 1ST FLOOR GROSS: 2,192 IF PRa CT r 0s010s LNINO f oArz.:u[a a ° — 2ND FLOOR GROSS: 2,084 IF a[N[o NEW . ..: ..; Y FOYER a.crsAc."0 mo nn o.o. . FIRST REVISION: NEW 13 iSTFLOOR GROS S 1,937 IF RAWBATH - - OEP�T iR CARE GIVER'S AC COMODAnONSGROSS: c sR 1 S F 96 N 2 D 6"ESS va0 CURRENT VERSION: 1ST FLOOR GROSS: 1,937 IF _ as BAnan Ew ::;Ax::''' y w _ Is'-Y FIRST FLOOR PLAN P A yF :.ft';:v';' ...,.,.,........ 'seue Ana•s'0 �roess om[nm AT2. TosA[ �SRo< u[RS 2 ), ,mlLis A[COu puv,Lrt� xVN",uC BPAm" Exhibit A-3 XaN'rRE(XO a eND(rN0) r",�,R�"'XD°�nl Lo„]AT; "` DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE #1 APPAD�ATl LOT 11iIAi• v'v (SEC°RAID N0• "SOIL EVALUATOR:�diBRS1A®IEl1_OATC:_]Q?L°I_ T B6B NOTE I AND „ jar °p•• rroR NR APPROVING AUTHORITY• A PLAN ASraI AND LONG BEACH t ROAD ,:.qYA a„u t «Ir. °IRN xp5a0 °IL,[.xrvRE —1 °rn]N° D NCA It or p"TVN ioRNc o °" sr.AE !^°"K ,j sr.lcco wreAiss r:S°�'� G+SA.•, _=`______-� \ J,wal - � _ Uace of TAre _ LSRn•'_�,,.'", � r--�\YI� �K7 I� �•.+.'-' im..- -L`�N OUGKo c uRUXpwAKA MRnxD A K.X Xa) srt[ M° �•I° T iI;1—;L }"2F° ' 1 P.' xp�oaa "C[n'L °"' pPERCOLATION TEST T°1 K NO / RON RK3(INO) JII l '1\`^LI 1 I W - ••'' II _ IT . iUML sOR \ / 1 111 i D R PERIORYCO`T:� OhiC: C.C. X T R]IC[]e APPROVING AUTHORITT: • , /r//,:a!t.✓i// i�wieT?»;R"`A SFRnoD°pR"mow DIrM Dr rIRL Tx[v emu_AR.�u AT LOCUS MAP III I11r Bc Ln. EROSION CONTROL BARRIER AA lai.3D- S�Se ° I„prat-TDAX °-_ J sarAnoiuii ei° SPECIFICATIONS 9 1 DETAIL (TYPI n:5[uuexs caDm X,Y�A�Xr.In ,O:oI nMnA.I- Mrl rGc I m TO s�AIE NOTEST DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE #2 "per IS ��O v�m SOIL EVALUATOR: DATE : ]ne/°J TffiS PLAN REQUIRES APPROVAL 1 ,`\ R.D APPROVING AUTHORIIYI R"pOMHS"e3. G.s.EL= UNDER BARNSTABLE CODE rlr npr'is w"Rcpup a.Iw.°s "o pL CRAPTER 7D0, ARTICLE U1. li f r I \- ` \ 'x• i MC m3a®x x nor,ourEDIRm,1 s.Apr LL orcx '^'m1{ JJ I[ w " aillr abp em/r 0 �u.(i�wn.IM-ie°'cclourtne w N" 360-3. a a I 1 \•- "Mrs p xrtln A x aV rt. sVrn Goal e�irF, _ 1a �� tn3lvo.. MCArrsRYc° [p.rz MI v;I,O[ ro" cnAoY� y3(SrtQogI+�,\\. ��,,, ryWr,]�,° t33[mni�' ro-1 osw. CMVAAM°c" I jllll \\\�"rl.•IS.M�YIR' ��!.•��-.�IA'�/./ o.n] BTIRVIp p R(wRr O a rv..)v) rNc scena xlw KPIK TAx0. I 1 i I i 1 I- \KST :�..,' Y�/r. .\•,\ gg 11 T"c cX. •`°"°�°ry N HOLE 3 '�•°° }11= \' \ H fm °N DEEP OBSERVATION # '[01".rY1OALDlrXiO LM51111[lnlr TNi,°nlf n 1 i III \\fit c ]Im srrt IS NprOlDGlm!TM µ E" k I ii "r Z San EVALUATOR: —I, GATE: X TAM. OR 5"n.MVR all"A N" wAr[ }I I - / P/ "e[ IrtM♦A APPROVING AUTHORITY: DDxun tayuRi 0.5 O.S.EL.y0_ i]101m°ixmip'��rluNfi an[l,na smEY K ru,IRR I ;j S 1 1 ill f� 't IILV. aruan r°aaA A s mea DRre RT rl.rn° IGOpW mriY,mi m]rrAM1 Am Slurs TSI'r'A'Ac �1_ i nAXa R s°xRcc. X,�" SEE SHEET 2 FOR THE INSPECTION REQUIREMENT "wmDOCai°.:l°MmL irArllnoGSTfiutXp�EnAttn L• swLwl ;pm ro.m+�. OVER I p�+; SCHEDULE REQUIRED PER 310 CMR 15.021 n —flm c[.uvpaL a eE 1pp1'�'"0v 1 V DBSc mH nnnm.LRUCIea Axo+AwaaID. \Y I '- `J°r01[RRP.ev) @`113� °°"„U / _ RED DaounDwAKR(XttrinD a srAnpma) °r PERCOLATION TEST T 3H c nmew oAO1Ti•anmCE YU Yx A LDCOm FRM \ ! LR NeX . TH fArt YMRf AXO ed \ I PERFORMED BY: Mm DATE:VIM' Dw[Wx°ae cuxncMnr HAS A U.—I \ I APPROVING AUTHORITY: OCHRO MARRS R.. 1N11 el5ro RCDOIR [ CCIIR a.Rv�l(rn.� y OA I 0 CNW .RIaR 1°]N[ IIroY°OIa"1VT YMllfAl.MOi -+� eevav(m KART°!RR:SN[V�!L' A[L• ]n9 A MR.UACTInr,AOI BIR x[Vr,L NIRRai STST[AL __ ____�� - - CHO E-SOAR - I'THC O.R+ 100.1NDD[R Is[10 T[YOV[D,0 p.m........xmn \ ras-saw mY]p f• D,DS [o e I_ TH,CE RURIIMCEII—M.A..R M[nlS011a OYKWNp R I—K iOwN WAl[IL a TV CX DAReAD[ I ArraOAXAK IACATOX 6+nO1rIL a ---- •x5 LALIONT COV,n„ YAH W. PIRG IUTC- AL.IS TlLxni --_ __ NPI M OCSMX n Can10[aCO VpOCO. nxrL �"o fwLL rRan[rAoru. ------- ----------- - _ DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE #4 DESIGN CALCULATIONS cMwADf AxAT pY M[LGexlxD STfr[Y -_ - San EVALUATOR: D.V,r erwvr Mmr. AXO TICE M[dxa SY11UclOLEA ----______ 11 v my x nmvA a GATE:5/i°/ar 1 BEOaOOYT D I]0 CPO- ea0 cP0 +IQ�M�N Rd -----'-- -- APPROVING AUTHORITY: ^ N1WAy,1`n=O.S.CL- n15 OCSrCn ROx -1 eeO MI,RI,,_"A,.ilO-IS iIIC mP of p,ulml r------_ zzt_ ELsv. OC'M xOrliOx SAIL JmUAt COLOR pm]rlc pm[" Le0e6GE,FBwGFB ID n p_(S a1I) LuvAnpx.Mc If n.DmANacn ro+c YGSIraID ___________________ x EHI - n . raoM Mc foBE 1 a,rnm[cpac Dr ra puYeTRs_ -------------� ' (rEA D[P 11WrsMRlAt R•.waalne) e.5 °-].' r n1 - m>i w,rt iOrAl DESIGN Ix} _p5ry®Q�C� Ip SwDt]Ory NwC y_rTyyl 66° cP° MC 1ML W— 11 A IWYBIXO IN 111E QIfMN drtL1110 F �- OIC_U�NMN w.T[I1_ _ el - Yn9f IbY • m OEs cx n X]OO 3. II 5] b Iona L w' F Ivy vvA m..v rmrO IS A eC a[-aOUt[0 Ta M[MRI xOX G rp.R' CI sNO ai!]/, wrt axPimR.va tOTK CPPACRT PRTYDEO S- CK rn""C1p1"NYr.ALL nrtG101,M1lMIXO SXALL _________________________ pu a OK Rv[O caOU TTAn T CTRE CMmowxOM[M�ARa rOR MDAY M ALL KAK AxO leE l'IWYmw roVd � pm Ja/OT [ xOw.tta(w[RIXO A Ha) u e BEDROOM COUNT NOTE:THC NUMBER Or BEDROOM FOR THIS nPST COVPARMEHi-09-ULt IDnC lL1LLIOOfTmXX DOFF 11NNff S�0 TAXX YAJ+ART DESIGN IS BASED ON MOOR PLANS FOR THE EXISTING OwI—B YIMVYY C.—E-�•O�WL IaOM 1M tLNaT]I fnOWx.111E CONYIUCma fM4L _______________________________ AND FOR THC PROPOSED AOORION. IE COYP"ARTlEOENT-rUT.ENT ZONE: YMXINI A E 1X aarC f0 TNC fpRIC TAXIL °-------'-- ~ MINIMUM COTRN NIrLYlI016/1OPODR"PI,N:SUmNc Rt -__�_�______�___-1}j•1Q1C 9L77RII'/�WATCF�_-- CIAED - GL P..M.P.AaDC,Ar6.lk P[RC MRRD.YOEO oEOroAD STPELT MS TH0IC PEERS HAS BEEN PR[PM[0 oD AKeRTax SKt S Wr BXIX[IeATEA YA CU O HEAEOR T -Zwl D W MTE-LYMPI PIS TMS"I rtENaF➢FOR M[ [RLU[M IOMINc -Nn]I CPO/5` SYSTEM PLAN PLAN REFERENCE• LAN REFERENCES: F.I,R.M.MAP 250001 00000 ZONING DISTRICT:EXISTING LOT k DWELLING(RO) EEYic PO[ASZOC .—ME sv cv0/3ZLcoO/sr �9L_ I.�mR DYE 0 RESOURCE PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT IH THE SPOSSESSIONI 1Or 0°cwRrt o mwX p ip r5 rr,of A lfAaR� "1Y1L KMI 1.5 l°rID BEAM ROrL LC PI.W IT[A THIS ME IS LOCATED IN ZOHE51 Y LOT MU-BT,IIO SF. N LOT IAOMICE 20 E °MOT OML ROR OUICR Si.npX^C CHn RS }K,VucR ra versa TVR M L�REF.TUL W BOON 11[1 P_11f A13 IOOYR R000 EL 11 Gr5},LOT MG-ae afOs SF.F%,T'r.FRONT,.iE-IS°fT' vcaTOx DME lnul ME PERSON CAMEO -LESS rRU-/"LO Lv R Dx lOtl rAR"'�vra""'CanM011RKicK SCALE] i• v.20 FT R P.eIP.ATSVC'ATn,IIL pp--"— 1 PACE'1 V1 B-1VOYR.COSTAL FLOOD ZONE YIN.rAONT TMO SETAACA-'°R. [P[aRR OR MEIS� Oq I1ED AODEM. ACNE./aG"},u R"J"R-J.I Sr. BATE"],+/oe. D EO REFERENCE.: WITH VELOCITY' WAVE ACTION EL•13 smBE TARIOro sSEflB.iT,-I �, ���OA'S MAP 105 i"HEH DOE Sp L E AH° EscR RR O[r IRA Yrti.t U BG Smi3Kf / ( ) OWXCGw PAACEI,0]I FTiEnRC ARG-R.12 Yn."•]]e V-Ime.S R. rASOi°Ai.�r SA ]deJ i vex:0. -15 ' AARA 30,IBA..ST, U m .s 111 Sr. rvvl Je.a sr ^0°®,e NR17.R1X1O D""r n61 m00 ;" �M Rmi ri][A nK'a�.iRT aplL.el:;D '°^q R,xr roYr°RNIK Xorz. Sr�.rL',alltl.r"`) (:E'c":R°1a 0 aR.a„�i N I'.,".e :,ru° RT •"SEPTIC SYSTEM Re imniom Mn I.e mv.Tvcxi D m AL°uo IS A "'m'a"°RA' °oru x �D�Oca�TaHie u[slo _ µ[mµ TN,Y o RleloulR• csRsno E"s t DESIGN opmcc°""aoa nanoc °m[rna[mmnl O. n p -SLOPE 293 LONG FOR ROAD I vTR. >; CENTERVILLE, MA. -°Ri°'� ri Fi o -- xrm. 4^ � n n ( pr cru„rto a r.0 BYRON B"JOYCEf HASEOTES A. `^ SEC[RUKOVT nGK) e " ] 293 LONG BEACH ROAD ,luleR f• :NnL1 .� H - 11.>'(z,Al CCNTERVILLE MA.02362 500-]3S-ZIT 67 All 's'°�L*�• .'�(' •R w Taa.E.p r m"If `a.r s.v, -. a.:.o`a�RiS.1 r"["°Ri°s°r"'"LTr P.M.P. ASSOCIATES. LLC KN1D1 TV REMOVE 4 RCPIMS I'D" B'OX 9 .xa i d0 crn KR aew-e Ran TmW v'Tl—SUBS OR.OR OTHER n.eLL r 300 N0.BEOfORO ST..[.BflIOGEYYATCR.YA µIeXKR mm—RHO T m m OR IMPERV�IIs SOn A Of 5 M Pp�SGrOMI XICN pAwHOaAI[A EL,al(•PI) SOA-]TD-311, U$ NEW 2000 GA _ y ,�n 6 ROWS OF Grnr"il"n"A vrTn ETE IN ALL o1 Tl��rt""TTTJsiRi+°N.,Dm u«x I A -.E I As xoln PRnaoNXI,/1"A° " w HIGH STRENGTH . wawa"'11rt rp11.c - INFILTRATOR QUICK 4 TO YHT N'TUR�Y CDCURNIXG PER,Us DETERMINED R:0OBSERVAROH Dr AcrvAL alma RICH HAT"CARE o.I ;A/n/aJ .I/Is/or °Rarc'!u FAST 1.0 N'"`.IA °f:..r p,,,,•,•rx, .,,M R,c xem BWDRr""is c]iiairn �1O1zEE s °m XOYY rnvp or a (cRUAOY con.a°„ct a SEPTIC TANK 'o"-s"'"e"' r MM"c'a°o Wynn rAaX Tw 'S STANDARD CHAMBERS vipfOr,cAn°"ol„` ®sea rntoR US Pm YEYNOV V ,s¢fNRr1) sEEsMEET:Or:FORINSTALunoM M[[w LIl IL VAR. A FIELD CONFIGURATION SO, TO 111—AR°—ATe TIP QUICK 4 CHAMBER SECTION 5"EYYf'°: '°/(.I a;':`"o... {3( u![M�]IB[R Iro,r2[[ ip AT OYM M O,LRS T°N1 APPROVWYC RIYISroX:a/a�9 (P[ T D CR) (NOT TO 54LC J INSTRUCTIONS AND DETAILS ¢EVAnax OF I.ex _VARES FIELD CONFIGURATION NOT TO SCALE ME SAYE DMN _"ATGX(T T). a , Exhibit A7-4 allera -Hp}Q i rzs plpYq b FAsie maynd v>med 100 Ft 1]aRnl lord zuavemMel k�m m,d meaeRxln alwbmen ra adoncm oeolamon em oden wH Z RpbwFwmfAfle morml.w..D lmn1»S held i im ii mrmlX lvduY.Noeermat ee bedew vbaw HrI.a WHI 1 wWil �rrep��n mmn.nn m..ee..rbm.yy°ml.rn to IIYInIMR 3 p0Sni1•wdwbReY ono mrvele Dme leRlX•zl• mrFmm.fw dnameT w . Iwc�i,I�m,.Iwbc�ell°.°Id v°ea°i 1�� revAl @ aS]�A1.e�q� In]ul .ewe S.•a lr M•,Iaay.[ fl 2 Vadb pe YlMed whore Arbn avtle wllMsbmald I irr 1. le Cw Mnea lln a ren vea.e Mnmvve vl+aM1v lvwm hetratlan Cm Mm rwd ode wld teal P.>A k.IEa]ra• A YdP°°limnvv � t Dolsrnm vl bon f.l q m.Ise.r w. 1 Pen.Rtvice Drew Sewn wlXl dvbsended wewn Pee y lisu>NII (iv..xr vNo eawe asase°ve rmnwwnasllve.,.l». y' 1 yn dieel id.NFASIe1m 0eFmJ '•"'I iwsll'Wrwtte ofvpelml. PVnved b,lbked bcalANl altl oertp wNAl Vent i»SNIT or w nrneonwa jw°v^'v'v.�Ynec.°••m see wni wbw•/albm11.1gh(�1+F�v�Pen swtv[»aea. pa akon f.Inrtlse]p.un �lt�les ll s Ifsl? 3.w[.Mm adgm deal ne+I.Vent lipFq nsm rolobn - �� � eM V PbbV met nvf dvw �� [ Inetul nM1Mve lMdw vapct sRm... tndteR..balmwada2Drva,.d 5 y ulel.. I°taP�nae°I..h d 7,At b.fARele.D.ta'k wd[.elc mmf Frnw rorrut �n°PoPm.'m"i`w.,el.rexn¢,.la..an.«-..e�"I. - roaaowmY lt°Is.wmkc w�i ixd Wmmq luv x.,,l nnmw emnlom: �^"yu�°•P«mca.oe..-do:.r-OB. . eedlcd mrwetem Ober b e„rw+� arltl ereeDlvd a+sde1111e dowawned sydembpvHtlee try NemlionwsenAd tv e.nvaw ebw.l„bw.l+aee.a.t»Iwram%`�'�i ,_,,,•,,, ek.Mboda.sre elo.,. lwtiv.t..mlw 1.z2°e s�mlew ae.N.m.n me°Naeee�e:e° "em olla Fin., F? ^^••�b"'e 41aR.v4ne mnr be l.aemeeisYSIEPrtAnr.enn of lOhNw �psxnW�o�alry yen , Cornel°don lvr appwx[ wrot.ra�o'b"'"°�°I, Ll1:e'3!: .the vRllwr EamanrAnl mor Dee.epaale lalL .F.As ''eP""e�.°1.odogv�R'»P:are°�:�m°e:.e°".n°a°.el°°w I"0n.:a"i" IN erperavVMloM' ICI o RSFV Ie vIeWq»c°a men PamF»m^a7.0 e.en,ermeFMra roe,rnt ee nlred wetly PlPe rnP alM m eeiaw.n,w e:i`:w`irlevnlNole mee m.wa^rYAI M1.a a bvine e.Paanro It�e nn m.m avS ee en.na0d n en by m o�sA.non o.a�o..,D. ' ^^ti^q'I me tonL nctIvwnvIo Vm Ille dPe wo.men me hams AaR da dleod DTXl ngnwn,on n,e.rofwb.el.ws,awnwm. � iAli°Jm°a.v u+�wnle�".�.��°�e4��'n..nae,m..eb , oim�.ua.1 Ell 7. Y°pdecr°accNMdwx�iM put«c°evmet be ncvea to r aw vl.r yyd v.ronevn.go...rwnv vov ara nun v. rV.v Aewl Cw.Me A IVM1 tbm,,,r�V IL Tat aTrM;plphB.mrMM.Eldwerb.�'Ig Pad aPe rann ObmOOM�w}w�e�vl��mMaM mlq fAP mnl ml I.Impede a mlAc Ovv Nw of em Prmta.a a omel. Ib"°w�ew�FA,nannwn e.I..wee naae I IS IIr.IT f.Al dD�y mttl mcewvevWtllembvMktl anw FASi9 mull V+:.I IIw,rAew ri Iv B:'e�'°d»,m° 'vn.�'.m»•r I. lyr rpf IitpeC mOtl bey M+ol eRuenf. y�� s�nil lxm 10.Ne mare mon.RII1131mn�IdXlm%De pklcetl vnR M. II.7imnIJM HweaubMvc�°ea:. loclvf anenleance M AmtMr 1111NN¢¢ I1Mmv/dand hide lab;Iv»srreet2l ala PAfle l.m vrtln Li ,I sso- M ,f :M�M1aal» Iwfl•0.etwbRvbsePvn monad nr delmE 11 R�wn1OdanAO•wMelmenn�Imo-lve aw.wvlabv T nbern w,mler WllaisUlF lee�°iCv.1 jn.mal c00 Nm SCA,E IMffitvl® I owRwNORP �o',w4b1"'" r+ENno10 1 mY,a n.ebwnl ARE IN INniD smnn° t .yM cl ........... s..ml.s law Se. __ /wa 1 �.,,....... IM -1 HWP+vlrrnn lm rrsrlee i+Tl jiu.oifJ.vCNI rOwlnrvm[usim rwp um SI� A »NSrAslelm.vn ro.l sNEn �'P�' �1T�sT3�odou elo-MI,CIIonICTo3DB lo. _ .nvna==�rmonm �PIO-MICROBICSmNAB tor+ - Ia SXydbewRJASTIm MmlerM>Tnvmlent tpsem n ^` �n�wno.aeau ""v"vv Mlnlmum h9 1e4 euleml assemoy .�Pec/ka0ae ea np nae.e ` ��vwn' iM.xntaedre eI Aqt MrY n vM Mot�1��Ilv�airmpnfAtlO.im Xevtmam ryslem m marulpclwetl bf eb#tlwYla.he ine healment rydvm,tlar De compb(e wen a0 needed egvlpmeni m �Rve ":j W,�I fa �t IF' llvwn nle'agwlllm vtlspetlXed.nbleF ifw nenedep�pmer�dld lldlde FASlefyytwn Feed, exlredonP ate bbww awmbly.bbwerewdrob arq dams AlvmwXem Wlbe ed by omer� ilia fAssll.00 aYl fltl be Clualed Mmhc7'A Gos lmvppeoOy Er►►sRRrl�q�adin.malankm gfwm vn msRrmpptmaamwle»n tega1av1ro1e bYM1DmR Ilblen d RwIW Im,7toAhtltTPl mrp Carllamlo Iota. IM . ineptr¢ah01750 'n^^ in01henA17r=vupnob. qNfippps�vpp teai ne.eoevtfaataO pMe M1alb sdbnam PAST 1 T and dehey No ilke a "1OPH19pnA�7trReIAgCmONOISgNS ryaem teoXnp rygS� Eby " MDIe LAwIImL Wmie Ieanl;; hftT9 Ws 1fhaPnDrodnscorwlnnd.dhxfieamle��n hme�FM rysl CarwH1 lom ppvNILdV pprM.e wmte.h d-Voq.M rv,hfiv. on il,s FAST meea,rla Ye mandocMed d dpM PVC,DoMirMero. potspapllel»aM n ma Oe wpPMed tl o 1'vlrrvb[ro�n m mT°d4eaiv Iv�IM Ob°Ran vtP Iltw a�`�ntoh no ^- Irlerky aw.ahc pan old dtatflesemnvae.iM hwdla PlNbe pnsa otia hdpsed b.rmne mat Dm"docsnd P t-L _ r .�•Vm J.eeowElt T»MD1vf��pinFA51 a90 wH 4q1 pame egvlpped Mm p repemnero Frye bbws.capobb of tlel.e4q Z/JS CFM I]SC,S rN/hl.iM bbww®embr/sMl pxNde an 4tle1 flle[rim meld cm�� f�/bP M�Re MOVNIED IIOWflt 4u wi I ' llro bkwrsstlaA De rtlDaaea.,wbl001eetpea met.ncdrtlumean llro NgtdllergmfAs7uric ono-tro ngpeeE le bme.Th.1b lwd not let hdondnp walaalwm ebnibn TTnnl De Ngnv man ms nwmpl Iboa breL A nrepbee.reclonpia Fades rhol De pmvbeEL lne d'edfwpe vk be hum Ina El-Iv Itm 1/BldhenBmfASI Sydem si>a'I ba poMded .awFaMeEnyd,eaannvda. ^•," aa..l - s.RlCIRJCAL iM vlecsR'dlT.aara dlvM De wlINn ISO liefd"doww.Cvrvuebcacodm lalongerwYfiB I'l1n, •w.M=,navl rorI-to rnde. Input pv«er 60tt Me lllcd rydembllO(IlO VAG A+pb pFuee.a,iFL7 ortm lrmN pvwQrn sCFh McMkd sydemi 730 VAG»lute Phme OAli Rw?n d0 fD mree puma 210/Im AC A SO N[eeee Pnme 190(iBO VAC we oDe vwlbDb. +w.h N eendp BrM.wttry alot Gnlppted by Carltractar. 7.CONTROLS FASIQSUd rueuu. ro.vev - paplweldMlprmldmpowerblMbbnwrMmanalam,ydem nbiFla Dlar6ualDrMwdde°lam cvpadbdAlawlhlB blowwdvAfoaveald Hght wcvndnwe.r-mrol Venl Opllan pwlM GmpeRrlp. SiPC lse�uaElcFp Flied Reoclarl lhpd conhvl leahie.Amawrd slMlce WtlonYMAAed. S IES1AllATION AN0 aPERAtRIG Iarkucnora A Iemota Air Supply Op lion Al wokMabibn arld rnrMdbmdtlle lA5AltrrnalnFAST Ilm Fnd.I dom lnaesapmce wen me wdeen let p=t1.Plana abTine mamRveYew andhattordancewlm va aPPI bb IDal mdm ana teaivXon.Opemlbm mamroh[nd1.n.MrbhedwsAll wN MJWeade[o1pX°n of Mv➢olwrt opemibn ana syd mdmenana Plvicedma I.Ixe..I.D.d.Idmwme rAne vm er Pb[FiDmetewe on.vd,ea vl m•ba enenxnl+a*o..pv 1.FLOW AND DOSING 2 CIOOull�lt,y j�e��'�d PVC ph.Xwl Ddne�tp abmHlne eeaw lwpt�Aww.m°�puolm Oln llc fAtT FYTlene Ste»bean nleraaM1as•deia;ee,Iedad and cwnMdlxeMrla aa.Slydermndtmetl lnMenSeow.Wnen hewed lbws rnnhvled WpuTlp aomamean lDFalp wP.n nighty Ims aa"26•"Yc° In mew wbgmvl111 Fina 1.Fyne v n I� rvlpbb cow eDndlibra men nMttpb doTklB events efdda de vud Iv Nip eraAe Iran Avw. dp•Iwl Yet�d}nML�U.v.+°pe mwabv v�Fvb H'y1�1. IMO.WdAaIOtlIDAn aR 61oabl-e I,lNyzlteanallehl noldo-ntle mhnrmen erhaElr"oc dn lksnle lApaM geat rolne lD nolrNgAlalw tlefehhlMa nF/p favPe'bd om 111 year ale[ emdea ls.Anvamw'..mne�br y ulNvIodot anr.neo.mr.rmsmlee evl,w amtl snMuemnn+Mm+nwwc�cmnv��e.aue.Atw i°o Ps•evor,ro niiFaCmValae<.ecal Xnw v�ovme.broeoamncnmSemv ov f v�on^wm^watm�^ �..I ..,.... m:a AFm I.m wRlea am,wD 0.rtw mewmmlty pwiod.IS pat b tlelec9.a er bll b pM pedlled wFwn wpaena pl dedp mMXom.andrtme egdpnpm nm dean Manoa mMDlxbp opwvlo d .. tlp.w me rAsn mnw•F,.c...de rn wcna�navoen ov.vR..me�s wowr e�WCe ,y.,n,,,R,.u,,,rlm.u,a. HIGH STRENGTH h vacvrtlmne Mtn Mwdeen pmWee Drely vJaodle hc_ebMbeble scrn,A mpakwrepbce vtmal.oenvn rvcn d°IvclM pwhlne of cbwn ofMNe pwn >.IVRmom,vpxq mae.la..w.Fu,aq Ro°a v ..nM1 v. I�os I r Deronmedbyowns beloAaavdo,hc•foci rwy odvpe pahLXroleglndea.tna e°d Drlab°rwta an amw o�enmleEatlnB nwnrwlaoeFrbmal me aelec11.pan w,a bom a=•e•a n,.m.,. - _ FAST 1.0 Mvtallon of parR Yardtwd,mtlw"HlY waralry ana roNRaP mahfanalee II=,10 m Rlen aam,nest be bane M memelw.mbwmm doe,nof mvagenerd,ynem mmm.Damla ^�,�p o,� awuaelaoxoe A Y SEPTIC SYSTEM MompvnennwMcn non Dew awrloaea anoeahga mlNNtenITlMlna.e Been do®elr,aea drw'o.nnwnoa m.lmvnPolry•o-„�oFeawaamoBoa e°e la onelva or lmPmPe[ �, ,o. .. ,. ,,,,,a „aA e� ,.._ '>oo.An �ywmmood pnroariar.iw wal�,ly Pam oliytoa l�le"ilealmem pa»a>d aowe fo h .ea.F or lne nw„v w> DESIGN DETAILS dr_d wpik nrlkadspamis/d eb�Mrts�pwvtln�lrle.1Drosa+�eRro dmd rotaWa.eflanpeamodly me to eta le a,ts[rouomme mnhuc datledSmatlMF sydem aoTlY IelaARkia pan lrorev.wenad hanhq elm vdXaaNaml° BID-MICROBICS, INC. SHALL BE NLL7 RESPONSIBLE 293 LONG'BEACH ROAD ate nsh dnnam anwdRcmMuhptmad egapmen, bb,he hnotrefponlDbfaaaveauen l hWentN oO NOFSGIE FOR THE DESIGN ANO FABRICATION OF THE HICH STRENGTHor d pe[dmry Me ham xnM ho of bvind Yliletl to.tleledhasagn mat°Aal.awa4nvMw,orddaysln nh- BHlF33 NOfm I FAST 1.0 TREATMENT SYSTEM AND SHALL BE FULLY M CENTERVILLE, MA. d.TMS WARRAFRY6MlhV OFALLO1Hfll WARRArlIRS OmP!>f OR WPIi®.tIOMICROXR33PEOr1GLLT DaI]ANAS ANY VAPUF➢ - MEIN NCH I i RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION, START-UP, AND vnu jeer°e rviuisiosx[ resr+R[D run WARRANTY Of MEACNAMAaM1RT OR iiRNFSS FOR APARIKNAR PURPOSE AAEIN MCH6 - MAINTENANCE, INCLUDING COMPLIANCE W17N THE r xn o°awl BYRON h JOYLE MASEOTES NO ICORMEIEPSI ........ es,re e[i. DEP APPROVAL(TRANSMITTAL#W072368). �'rP will m[izuvAnon-.nox[ZEE- 293 LONG BEACH ROAD ANY ODFSEWfUTE OR PFRSONTIAUMORQE01OGIFITI FOMEP WAPRAMYORrOddhIr MR WofopoA OXICS.RJG. LERA1N�L6 DTIE CENTERVILLE MA.02362 AIff OIHEROMNIT IN CONNECTION WSIH/HESNE Of In PRODULIi.Comadywbew tlOXiDulalapprb alM smdee. > vLA4val HXIISXeIIBmFAST IPO FAST VM a u.eC aArE Or TIE eiPxcxe-Eu°pasv.11.Nle 1- 508-M-2167 _ roioP To RIpSMRLNO.s I.suev[ir u. v[IrnP[7 PREPARED er rencanANmwlla vR.RweoeM teorertr rrn[e-[oo,e HFMrw.FM A 14fA91o0spedkonom LOCAL SALES REPRESENTATIVE, _ _ew o n ms AV p�ae�t��wp �v% SHEET JOHN ROLANO P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC 011m� bra�.aPw rb CF50�rsa vaO�AwµO cwgR�mmpn x0�^IQ BI0-MICROBICS m 2008 SOF2 508-771-5570 OR joA.1c TMt LT 11 NR TIE 0 ar THE eo 200 N0.OCOF SOB JJe�11=RjIOLEWATCR,NA hK 508-82.3-9566 _�liT,u +iE�or T NETRE nm[xr G1zi A Rmslpx I[%rijoeo xoi%i%ai° or I'S oxserulss or x Fa TNEfxicav riell°ON`�w MIs TnRR. r , � ��������.�//f'!�I�� ~��AFL���f�i •� P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC CIVIL ENGINEERING& LAND PLANNING CONSULTANTS .%�axinur�ett�ucee�fr��Ca�i f.�e�'ufurre, fada�� �- �- O 200 North Bedford Street Tel.(508)378-3421 East Bridgewater,MA 02333 Fax.(508)378 -8382 www.pmpassoc.com Board of Health Public Health Division July 31, 2009 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Subject: High Strength FAST Monitoring Requirement`§---293 Long Beach Rd._(Project No. P007.00) Dear Board Members, I have prepared this letter in response to a request from Thomas A. McKean, Director of the Public Health Division to outline the following monitoring requirements that are to be applied to the proposed Bio-Microbics High Strength FAST treatment system for the above referenced property: l. The monitoring of the system shall be in full compliance with the DEP Certification for General Use as published in Transmittal Number W072368 (Issued June 16, 2006). 2. In accordance with this DEP Certification, Section IV 3. Operation and Maintenance agreement,the signed O&M agreement is to be submitted to the Board of Health prior to the utilization of the system. This signed agreement between the maintenance contractor and the property owner shall be for a two-year period 3. For the first two (2)years of operation, the system shall be inspected and wastewater tested on a quarterly schedule. 4. The wastewater influent and effluent_shall be tested. The minimum testing parameters are to include the following:pH, BOD, TSS, TKN,Nitrates and Nitrites. 5. After two (2)years of operation, the applicant and/or their representative shall appear before the Board of Health, during a public meeting, to present the results of the influent& effluent testing. It is anticipated that the above listed requirements will be included in the conditions of approval. Should the Board have any further questions in regard to this matter,please contact me. C Very truly yours, M.P. Associates, LL t r' LJ el E. Per rault, P.E. P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC L�74' ft W TG3laMM` TAL CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND PLANNING DATE % _G /, JOB NO. (}07 C�(� 200 North Bedford Street ATTENTION (East Bridgewater, MA 02333 RE: g c � ��� r �� 2 I� Tel (508) 378-3421 Fax (508) 3 8-8382 TO L6Z'y0yL_.'5 '� L2 P- WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached jW,va I" 1�-E"�12 7Z j /M L the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Sy Z'lf,�' �r�. �L"P. 1� �� Gi�Yh?rtl >%Gs� f1' •"HI/c'� ����r • F , )a- 11 i�' v THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: t5 For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distibution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ // REMARKS C1 ram( ��4� ' �%1 � � 5��/�L'��?I»n 77�^ c2, 7�3/� • a�_ i+� 11 n 3 n i5iv"� ill "� (J i I ��. � J �� � E'er u_ � ��y',� : _ � /•`��'. COPY TO i5-I u MM+F oes�o SloaED- If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. ,.o. FETE COMMONWEALTH OF ;ASSACIEFJS�TTS. Board of Health, P,(tr S 1l� APPLICATION FOR DISPOSAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION 'I_-JRMIT Application for a Permit to Constructe<Repair( ) Upgrade( ) Abandon( ) - '9'Complete System ❑Individual Components Location 293 I-M& aeAul RD Owner's Name Z3UYCE Map/Parcel# I Address2b Lc 9a'+tkl.xle)6udlodn Lot# 0 Telephone# 50 •-<737— Z2,4/ Installer's Name Designer's Name R 1AA ' 5L)ul r&5 LLB Address Address 2W M ReDi-r'40 r .f 3 -.,y&L-1A3rfT Telephone# Telephone# 3 7 3 l ll Type of Building G i 01-!• L � !"3f1 Y Lot Size3t)2 '/F 7 t�- sq.ft. Dwelling-No. of Bedrooms N©Garbage grinder++- Other-Type of Building No. of persons Showers ( ),Cafeteria ( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow (min./required) ��l 1. gpd Calculated design flow 660 Design flow provided��gpd Plan: Date�/e,�'7�� /-y Number of sheets Revision Date Title S L PTI L SY57& D L Sr j lIs �1�L 17,65760 Description of Soil(s) t IC 0-4o;tC +- 1 Lj �,, a Soil Evaluator Form No. Name of Soil Evaluator��(2&WrQLct Date of Evaluation D DESCRIPTION OF REPAIR$OR ALTERATIONS e7"P- e- C-e_ O S The undersigned agrees to install the above described Individual Sewage Disposal System in accordance with-0 pro�,tsioris of TIC I Es5 an tr- 'u> rrh further agrees to not to place the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Board gf;He._ j Signed Date Inspections ` No. FEE COMMONWEA1_T1I OF MASSACHUSiETTS Board of Health, 1VIA. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Description of Work: O Individual Component(s) ❑ Complete System The undersigned hereby certify that the Sewage Disposal System; Constructed ( ),Repaired ( ),Upgraded ( ),Abandoned ( ) by:at has been installed in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 15.00 (Title 5) and the approved design plans/as-built plans relating to application No. dated Approved Design Flow (gpd) Installer Designer: Inspector: Tate: Town of Barnstable P# Department of Regulatory Services Public - „ c Health Division �/ Date 'bJ9 200 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Date'Scheduled -7 'Time Fee Pd. /GY�) ---------- SOU-Suitability Assessinent or Sewage ge Disposal Performed By:P.9T2 t:C:k•/.f. 6.9/?R,41?1J /r Witnessed By: 00.vA40 /Z. =41COCATION& GENERAL INFORMATION Q� // L Qn3 14C R _ . 1 Owner's Name 2 �'�r, -�15eri 112 i^Ci ( � ✓Yt Address �9 3 �� �.S 13 C e v`Le r L) (U rVA 1 5�3 YEngineer's NameV REPABZ A S5 0G la+e 5 L Telephone# 37�. 3 Land Use rG-'lJ.rrvS OwEGLZniS. Slopes(%) D-.f- Surface Stoncs 11774-t At,f 1:wA1,6J Distances from: Open Water Body 00 ft Possible Wet Area �--_�0_ft .Drinking Water Well ft Drainage Property ere Line + . p Y �2-- �ft Other _ft SKETCH:(Street name,dimensions of lot,exact locations of test holes&pert tests,locate wetlands?n proximity to holes) 1 I I I ZoS. I I N 16 I C � — b 1 a ,' Parent material(geologic) OyniE DEPoJ'zr t v Depth to Bedrock 7/O Z T jo y Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in Hole:�-r 7,4 f.Z Weeping from Pit Fpcc Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater 60 a MoTrLEl TAI 7P Z,. DETERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER.TABLE Method Used: 0Ltf yF4 /11071eE.I Depth Observed standing in obs.hole: 0 a T Depth to weeping from side of obs.hole: in. 'Depth to soil mottles: Z Index Well# Reading Date: index Well level Groundwater Adjustment ft. _ Adj.factor_.,,•_ Adj.GrOundwater Level PERCOLATION TEST bate V21/0ff �,p�o�vD Eak T� 1 Tp Time at 9 /0.'pr . 2 y..yZ rr . '20-,y f P n Time at 6" �' N k Time C 9'` p /O:D Z . Time(9"-6") /Q�/� /O;/ Qa!lV TfffJ: ZrSALeo,�fGo v�Q ivoT M/aTioSiJ ch zZh r /Zrr Site Suitability Assessment: Site Passed Site Failed: Additional Testing Needed(Y/N) .� Original: Public Health Division Observation Dole Data To Be Completed on Back----------- ***If percolation test is to be conducted withiii 100' of wetland,you must first notify the Barnstable Conservation Division at least one (1) week prior to beginning. Q:\SEPTIC\PERCFORM.DOC DEEP.OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# J Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture .Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones;Boulders. Consistency,% ravel veV jcLSA04E 0-9 u Ajo SAxio./LoAM /0y/L14-4 NONE cAw,v /Loom_ 'O eTAOLf MeotvM JA.voy LOAM /0x/L`'�i� /1/0NF J'7. PEadcE ;,vVEL. fi�FTf�ffO r To / _gs-!, CI XANO 2.f/'7/-, CW4A-Cf rAnro LoOXF it,o✓tLy' LAyf.� avLg C41-EV 2'w. DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# 2- Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. Consistency,%Gravel) y` VFiay FittApaF Ap JAnro aAM !0/(Lz-/Z NONL� cA o TJ +c-'CA9zC,H/f'0 SuM SA,voyGuAM {0.), L -7 PEGOLL`. ,o..o M.,aEa wcrH (O++ Q/ONO JfrtAttftl`o FtvFla Z L-�® or z•ryY/ Loo,rE,lrrmrl.FVAIOTn% Cic,O,.Fu_ L.4yCi'✓. DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# 3 Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil.Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. n i tc o ve VF.y 09'UA0ZE 0 r�tr A rAivoyi3OAM /o//L L/Z A10A/E ,0+•,,,v /Loor.I- ;EA ABLC,,MfOTv/`+ fA,,,o M. lOy/LyIG ,vo/vC f2.. P�B4�E SANo 2. ry?/,/ / V vE C,4A„rF r&-O DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG ! Hole# `/ 50l I Ocher Depth from F Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Mottling Structure,Stones,Boulders, Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) g _ . on i n Tpp.rofL�dAna FtL� I 0-Zyn F - 1`L4. F,c,fa OcF, Qvr.-T!-'o Z5f-7,7� /-fib SA.rroycoAM 10X(L -/Z /VOnie• 14or-CL"', ftIAGoE, MfOtvM av JAroyLuAM d'j, PfUOLF. ;r rj-r r4a FrA,,-to .rAA/0 2.-r./�Jy tio,vE C�A,�J- JANO Loo1F..ft.✓f�f 4rLgfiY Flood Insurance Rate Map: Z,r000 J 00080 Above 500 year flood boundary No� Yes Witten 500 year boundary No= Yes Within 100 year flood boundary No, Yes x z o/v6 A /3 Depth of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist,in all areas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? If not, what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? -- Certification z//Z. (date) I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the I certify that on Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with . the required training,expertise and exp rience described in 310 CMR 15.017. oe Date -7109 a 7 Signature 03 P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND PLANNING CONSULTANTS 200 North Bedford Street Tel.(508)378-3421 East Bridgewater,MA 02333 Fax.(508)378-8382 www.pmtassoc.com Board of Health Public Health Division July 31,2009 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Subject: High Strength FAST Monitoring Requirements—293 Long Beach Rd. (Project No. P007.00) Dear Board Members, I have prepared this letter in response to a request from Thomas A. McKean, Director of the Public Health Division to outline the following monitoring requirements that are to be applied to the proposed Bio-Microbics High Strength FAST treatment system for the above referenced property: 1. The monitoring of the system shall be in full compliance with the DEP Certification for General Use as published in Transmittal Number W072368 (Issued June 16, 2006). 2. In accordance with this DEP Certification, Section IV 3. Operation and Maintenance agreement,the signed O&M agreement is to be submitted to the Board of Health prior to the utilization of the system. This signed agreement between the maintenance contractor and the property owner shall be for a two-year period 3. For the first two (2)years of operation,the system shall be inspected and wastewater tested on a quarterly schedule. 4. The wastewater influent and effluent shall be tested. The minimum testing parameters are to include the following: pH,BOD, TSS, TKN,Nitrates and Nitrites. 5. After two (2)years of operation,the applicant and/or their representative shall appear before the Board of Health, during a public meeting,to present the results of the influent&effluent testing. It is anticipated that the above listed requirements will be included in the conditions of approval. Should the Board have any further questions in regard to this matter,please contactme. Very truly yours, "= P. .P. Associates LL W ichael E. Perrault, P.E. anager _1 ., 1 • � ` { 1 � I � A ; I d6 . re r..._ .a .�iN ..- •. � s-.Y�t•M - m ef'ww .�fax.� - •.� - � � a ♦, rt �a w. � -r tiN r • �� . . -. f 1 1 r � i t ` . - •I' � •l i� � � �. �,V_i �f ,+! �. � �1` .i r � �{? 1 ._ F. ` 31i1 �� . . � T t���'f" 1Y..r . �IT1•. • _ � �� ri' --{'��, '{ � it 1 � .i.! � - .. .. it rtl_ �t�{ f. i�F t�. { r � %'3 -.. Ti i ' r I 1 , � _ i r J�ir 11`J( 1, ���.•a r, . r r. � � � .{.� 1 i 1 r {i1`.`{11<1.. sE. lir +�.'i ...�' r`rr i -1 J �. _ r � . '+.� #t., , . ,E ' �" 4 P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC L97TER OF TRANSMITTAL CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND PLANNING DATE 3),0 JOB NO. 0070 200 North Bedford Street ATTENTION East Bridgewater, MA 02333 RE: 2 g Tel (508) 378-342111�L�G Fax (508) 3 8-8382 TO 515 1� �D MAW WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached Via N 2 0 0 G Z L the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION d -W 0 Q rWI G R(- lJ 12 ,NJ7 k&, 77�9? COPY OF `Z S c)17 )117✓ 0M9--' �t ff7 C'3 6 P �r G� 6� W 0 7a3 64j'- T (-e4* )- s�na 10- mter0e)63 S 0w w a - THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: D— IfAu fl For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distibution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ I REMARKS Tte Comt"'o'l 14 ' Ir" Gvr 7123 a ezx; ©� A;� 'TP >10 PG . 6�"&7Ar T /y COPY TO �� 2efux MM+F O-C)d(V- SI ED- If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. . . : 3 _ _ _ t. _ , . . . � s - ,. 0 .. _ •\ i � t , ' "� ' , - � � •� . �� i � � _ S - - � - - - -- - . • � - - -- - - - -- - � - --- - � , , i -� '. � ! ' t � . � �� �� � �_�, , , � r , )tI __ - _- - � - - - --- r _ \ -, -�, � �- � _1 _ Y _� _ _ .f .` , . r � � _ ' t 1 ' \\� Tow 4 n of Barnstable P# � 7J Department'of Regujato c r'3'.,cryacea Public Health Division f r Date ��rED yq. 200 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 i J Date'Scheduled Tiine Fee Pd. /G�J Soil Suitability Assess tfor Sewage Disposal. Performed By:NAT2 tGk'd. 6,4RIZAR r ' Witnessed By: 00ivAlo /1. OFV11A4•411,/l.S r LOCAT�,N& GENT, INFORMATION Location Address p / 4�h (? Owner's Name ( fNl Address d9 3 Assessor's Map/Parccl: 1 5`/.3 Y r c; 1 ¢ yvt/a / Engineer's Name _ NEW CONSTRUCTION V �'�-5��C lG,t�S REPAIR Telephone# SUsS 37F 3 Land Use ��'+J rtAX OwEr_Z_Cvf,. Slopes 0`Ir Surface Stones If mA'f /Lfl:WAGGJ Distances from: Open Water Body 00/ ft Possible Wet Area -.__ft Drinking Water Well`_ft Drainage Way ft Property Line "� �2-S'o -�_ft Other _ft SKETCH:(Strut name,dimensions of lot,exact locations of test holes&perc tests,locate wetlands in proximity to I P y holes) I.. 1 Z 06.sn' 5, Nc z fv " I r 1 t,Z,Z��t� \ Parent material(geologic) OyNE DEporcrd 7/0Z Depth to Bedrock T y Depth to Groundwater. Standing Water in Hole: (.T 7p f.Z Weeping from Pit Face Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater 60" Mo7-1r4Ef TA/ 7p 7— DETERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER.TABLE Method Used: OQJE�.vEp MlfJr�Ef i Depth Observed standing in obs.hole: 60 r' T rl Depth to weeping from side of obs.hole: In. Depth to soil mottles: r, Z In: Index Well# Reading Date: Index Well level in. Groundwater Adjustment ft. .___�.. Adj.factor,,,,' Adj.drountlwater lxvel , PERCOLATION TEST Date 2/2!/07 Thne/o'oo Observation - Hole#- - Tj� I TP Time at 9" /a�V 1 /0.'p,r Depth of Pere 2 y`12 a . 10-,y1 �._ .... .`_` Time at 6" �' N Start Pre-soak Time C 8 /O:O Z Time(9".6") End Pre-soak /Q;13 /0./7 Qoru rfJfr: 2r <Alco vJ — _7 GovcO .vvT 1%7A4v710siV LZH�i RateMinJlnch zlih � Site Suitability Assessment: Site Passed Site Failed: Additional Testing Needed(Y/N) .N Original: Public Health Division Observation Dole Data To Be Completed on Back----------- ***If percolation test is to be conducted within 100' of wetland,you must first notify the Barnstable Conseli-vation Division at least one(1) week prior to beginning. Q:SEPTICVERCFORM.DOC t DEEP.OBS� RVATION HOLE LOGn1ling Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture soil Color Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) (Structure,Stones,Boulders. 0Consistency,% ravel Vfcy F�AOcE O-9N f_ SA +c4*AM /0yn_1-/2 A10AIF CAw.v /Loo1rr. -� FR,?�Ocf, MFoTvM AM /o,Y/L yr; -F .!'� Pr4oLe titiovE-L Jr^Arrcr75 rz&E ro J'AN4 2. 1•yi�/y C^,,r1d4a0 6, 4A-rf rAAV c avrE OF .�r .'rFLV 44,1 rA-r vLg CA(/LO d N. y�5 DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG ole# 2 Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(ic,): (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. si e % av 1 y L VFtiy Fi11Apo�` AP .f Onno o�4M �Z c,e o T1 rc.zA rl�E�HKO ZuM _ �-1 Y^ 49. JANoyl uAM IO,Y/t y/,� Ago'41.eeo t fJu.o doZL. t7A�,a orrjCfedZL-F-an �� JPA.10 2.fy'/y �ti1E dA..ro oodf,Jtn.�cEC'�toTni . DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG. Hole# 3 Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil - Other. Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. Consistency. ve VF_Ay 9t,fA04E A fdvoyLoAM i1/oniF FicfAdGG`,,MEOlvM JANoyLuAM !Oy/Ly/t; /vo/VL' f?. PrBQGE -ANo 2.J'r?/Y /vo.V,-e' C-.4n.,rf rAAo LOOJE, .r'jNCLE�I..,olN DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG ! Hole# `/ Other Soil Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Structure,Stones,Boulders. n Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) g ( TvPfosGI JAMo Fta L i. 0-2yr' __.._ f. Frc4. ZfAoGF Ov--zro 2�/-��r� /qb ,fAvvyLoAM lOj/R,-r'I Z, /VON l,rIn-CI- ftrAO�E,M,FGCvM 3�- Yo" a�•. rAroy40AM '(Owns/6 NONf d-z PEvoGE. f tat o rrFre 0 FrA�e to yo-/OZ" << -rA.Vo 2.Jr/'7/y /(,o vE Co4Aj.- JA,-o cooeF.Xf-rcef 4'vWr/v !.Mvl`�y GelyrrN. . Flood Insurance Rate Map: Z So O o 1 0009 Q Above 500 year flood boundary No Yes Within 500 year boundary No Yes Within 100 year flood boundary No _ _ Yes x Z o/Vet Depth of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist,in all areas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? If not,what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? Certi_rication y fZ q 8 I certify that on (date)I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required training,expertise and ex rience described in 310 CMR 15.017. Date Z?ff/07 Signature SEP-02-2009 08:03AM FROM—UP Associates, LLC 5083786382 T-568 P.001/005 F-084 P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND PLANNING 200 NORTH BEDFORD STREET EAST BRIDGEWATER, MA 02333 Performing Engineering for the future, today' FAX COVER LETTER DATE: PAGES (with cover letter): TO: 'r\Q.. FAX#• - 5(J 97 L 'COMPANY• L g CC: FROM: lC/VI �i!/1, �i rMr Project No._ SUBJECT: MEMO: e .5' lfgf� CONFIDENTIALLY NOTE THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS PRIVILEGED&CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE USE OF TIRE INDIVIDUAL NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT/EMPLOYEE/AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,THEN YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION OR COPYING OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED_ IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THESE DOCUMENTS IN ERROR PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CONTACT US. VOICE NUMBER: (508) 378-3421 FAX NUMBER: (508) 378-8382 SEP-02-2009 08:03AM FROM-PMP Associates, LLC 5083788392 T-568 P-002/005 F-084 ITT Wastewater Goulds Pumps GWP23x P ackages Wastewater O acka es FEATURES ■ Choice of Pumps: A9-2PH • PV Vortex • PS Non-clog • WW05 Vortex a9-zp ■ Ribbed 23x30 Polyethylene Basin ■fully assembled at the factory for simplified installation. ■Swing type 2" check valve: • A9-2PH rubber sleeve type • A9-2P compression type ■Schedule 40, 2" PVC discharge pipe with 'Is" bleed hole is factory installed. ■Structural foam cover is strong and corrosion resistant. ■Vent grommets for both 2" and 3" vent provided. Adds system flexibility and reduces inventory. ■Torque stop insert to stabilize the pump. ■ Ribbed Basin Inlet Hub is a molded-in, slip-fit type for connection using flexible, slip-fit connectors and clamps (not included). GOU LDS PUMPS SPECIFICATIONS 23 x 30 — Basin: - ■ Ribbed polyethylene basin Goulds Pumps is a brand of ITT ■ Usable capacity: z4.8 gallons Residential and Commercial Water. ■ Inlet: 4" inlet hub www.goulds.com Engineered for life SEP-02-2009 08:04AM FROM-PMP Associates, LLC 5083788382 T-568 P.005/005 F-084 ITT Wastewater PACKAGE WITH WW05 PUMP PACKAGE O ORDER PUMP VOLTS BASIN COVER CHECK eIDISCHARGE-i NUMBER VALVE —PIPE GWP1131 WW0511AC 11S 18"Structural A9-2PH Ribbed Polyethylene Polyethylene Foam Cover 2"Rubber Diameter x GWP1132 WW0512AF 230 with Bolts, Sleeve Type 30"Long 23"Diameter x 30"High with Sealing Tape Schedule GWP1231 WWOS11AC 115 4"Slip Type Inlet Hub and and(2)2"and A9-2P 2" 40 PVC Pump Torque Stop Insert (1)3"Vent Compression Discharge GWP1232 WWO512AF 230 and Discharge Grommets Sleeve Type Pipe PUMP INFORMATION C2 PUMP HP VOLTS MAX. MIN.CIRCUIT PHASE FLOAT SWITCH POWER CORD DISCHARGE MAXIMUM MODEL AMPS BREAKER STYLE LENGTH CONNECTION SOLID SIZE WWOS11AC 0.5 115 13 20 1 Piggyback wide angle 20' 2" 2" WW0512Af 230 6.5 15 rD Information on individual basin components for"replacement parts"may be found in the Basin Section,kit numbers CWK11,CWK12,CWK21,CWK22 and CWK23. ®Additional pump information may be found on the pump bulletin. WW05 PERFORMANCE CHART—See"Performance chart Note" Pipe GPM Length Vertical Head Feet (Feet) 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 25 75 68 62 52 40 27 67 61 54 45 35 24 75 61 55 48 40 32 22 100 56 50 44 3 21 150 48 43 38 6 200 43 39 29 2 250 39 35 31 26 21 1 15, .10 300 2 1 29 1 24 1 20 ''' '1 14 j .10 NOTE: Shaded area does not meet 21 GPM.Mimimum Scouring Velocity for 2"pipe. NOMENCLATURE Ribbed 23 x 30 Basin Dimensions CHARACTER CODE 6.3" 1 -3 GWP=GP Assembled Vortex Wastewater Package - 21„ 26.4" - 11 23"x 30"Ribbed basin with A9-2PH check valve— 12 4 and S 12 23"x 90"Ribbed basin with A9-2P check valve I I 11 P551 P1 F 20'Pi back wide angle 13" I I 1 2 25" 12 PS52PIF 20'Pioqybackwidean le 13 PS5I AV 10'T-Spliced vertical switch 14 PSS1A1 10' T-Spliced wide angle _ 21 PS41 P1 F 20'Piggyback wide angle 22 PS42P1 F 20'Piqqyback wide angle I 3V 23 P541AV 10'T-Spliced vertical switch 4"INLET 6 and 7 24 PS41A1 10' T-S liced wide angle 31 WWO511AC 20'Piggyback wide angle 32 WW0512AF 20'PiQaybackwide angle 41 PVS1 Pi F 20'Pi back wide angle 42 PV52PIF 20'Piggyback wide angle 43 PV51AV 10'T-Spliced vertical switch 44 PV51A1 10'T-Spliced wide angle 23" 45 PVS1 P1 10'Piggyback wide angle For additional basin kit data,see basin bulletins BCPCWKI I. GOU LDS PUMPS BGWP23X30 October,2006 Goulds Pumps and the ITT Engineered Blocks Symbol are ®2006 ITT Corporation registered trademarks and tradenames of ITT Corporation. �,f SPECIFICATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. Engineered for life r SEP-02-2009 08:04AM FROM-UP Associates, LLC 5083788382 T-568 P.004/005 F-094 GOULDS PUMPS Wastewater PACKAGE WITH PS PUMP PACKAGE PUMP MP VOLTS BASIN COVER CHECK DISCHARGE NUMBER VALVE PIPE �VVP1111 PS51P1F 115 GVyP1112 PS52P1F 230 G T1113 PS51P1F 115 A9 2PH GyVp1114 PS51AV 115 18"Structural 2"Rubber GWpi 121 PS41 P1 F 115 Foam Cover Sleeve GyJP1122 PS42PIF 230 with Bolts, Type 2"Diameter GWP1123 P541AV 115 Ribbed Polyethylene Sealing Tape X 30"long 6Wp1124 PS41A1 115 23"Diameter x 30"High with and(2)2" Schedule 40 6WP1211 P551 P1 F 115 4"Slip Type Inlet Hub and and PVC PS52P1 F 230 Pump Torque Stop Insert (1)3"Vent Discharge ,WPt212 ,Wp1213 PS51P1F 115 and A9.21) Pipe 6WP1214 PS51AV 115 Discharge 2° 6WPI221 PS41P1F 115 Grommets Compression 6WP1222 PS42P1F 230 Type �WP1223 P541AV 115 611yP1 4 PS41A1 115 p�Mp INFORMATION MAX. MIN.CIRCUIT FLOAT SWITCH POWER CORD DISCHARGE MAXIMUM PUp4P HP VOLTS AMPS BREAKER PHASE STYLE LENGTH CONNECTION SOLID SIZE MopEL T-s liced vertical PSa1AV 115 10 20 T-s liced wide angle 10 pS41A1 0.4 Piggyback wide angle 1PIF 230 5 15 Piggyback wide angle 20 P54ZP1F 1 T-s liced vertical P5511-V 115 13 20 T•s liced wide angle 10 PSSW 0.5 Pi q back wide angle P551pIf 230 6.5 15 Piggyback wide angle 20 052P1 F n individual basin components for"re lacement pans"may be found in the Basin Section,kit numbers CWK11,CWK12,CWK21,CWK22 and CWK23. anon o P P P Y ®add Anal pump information may be found on the pump bulletin. PERFORMANCE CHART—See"Performance Chart Note" P� GPM Pipe Vertical Head Feet length 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (feet 96 88 82 74 65 54 43 33 24 B3 77 70 47 38 30 2 7 6 62 56 4 42 35 28 21 6 57 51 45 33 26 1 3 48 44 39 29 23 7.' 1 1 47 43 2 39 35 31 22 1 ..:• t0•:':: 43 39 36 33 28 a 21 D a3 39 37 34 30 27 23 15 ... .' 9 .:. F 30 P551 PERFORMANCE CHART—See"Performance Chart Note" PM Pipe Vertical Head Feet Length 2 d 6 8 1 10 1 12 1 14• 16 18 20 (met) 1p5 99 91 84 1 7S 65 55 45 35 2S 25 g 85 78 71 63 56 48 40 32 24 8 7 . bg 62 1 57 44 37 30 22 7 62 57 52 40 34 28 21 1� 61 58 54 49 45 35 31 25 1. . 10 54 1 48 44 40 36 32 28 23 : 17. 2 '..; d7 44 40 37 34 30 :1 26 21 0 d6 43 40 37 34 31 24 : ':20.:;;..: 1' ::::..,. 30 N01 g:Shaded area does not meet 21 GPM,Mimimum Scouring Velocity for 2"pipe. 3 r SEP-02-2009 08:04AM FROM-PMP Associates, LLC 5083788382 T-569 P-003/005 F-084 ITT GOULDS PUMPS Wastewater PACKAGE WITH PV VORTEX PUMP PACKAGE m ORDER PUMP VOLTS BASIN COVER CHECK DISCHARGE NUMBER VALVE PIPE GWP1141 PV51P1F 115 18°Structural A9.2PH GWP1142 PV52P1 F 230 Foam Cover GWP1143 PV51AV 115 2"Rubber with Bolts, Sleeve 2"Diameter GWP1144 PV51A1 115 Ribbed Polyethylene Sealing Tape Type x 30"Long GWP1145 PV51 Pt 115 23"Diameter x 30"High with and(2)2" Schedule 40 GWP1241 PV51 P1 F 115 4"Slip Type Inlet Hub and and PVC GWP1242 PV52P1 F 230 Pump Torque Stop Insert (1)3"Vent A9-2P Discharge GWP1243 PV51 AV 115 and 2„ Pipe GWP1244 PV51A1 115 Discharge Compression GWP1245 PV51P1 115 Grommets Type PUMP INFORMATION PUMP HP VOLTS MAX. MIN,CIRCUIT PHASE FLOAT SWITCH POWER CORD DISCHARGE MAXIMUM MODEL AMPS BREAKER STYLE LENGTH CONNECTION SOLID SIZE PVSI AV T-spliced vertical PV51A1 115 13 20 T-spliced wide angle 10, PV51 P1 0.5 1 Piggyback wide angle 2" 2" PV51 P1 F Piggyback wide angle 20' EPV52P1 F 230 6.5 15 Piggyback wide angle r9 Information on Individual basin components for"replacement parts"may be found In the Basin section,kit numbers CWK11,CWK12,CWK21,CWK22 and CWK23. ®Additional pump information may be found on the pump bulletin. PV51. PV52 PERFORMANCE CHART—See"Performance Chart Note" Pipe GPM Length Vertical Head(Feet) (Feet) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2S 95 89 83 77 70 62 53 45 35 22 50 83 78 73 67 61 55 48 40 31 , s.40 75 76 71 66 61 55 50 43 37 28 J8 100 69 65 61 56 51 46 40 33 26 9J. ISO 60 57 S3 1 49 45 40 35 29 23 16':,',: 200 54 51 48 44 40 36 32 27 21 `14 250 49 47 44 40 37 33 29 24 s.;19.;"r.•`. :; 13.;` 300 1 46 43 do 37 34 31 27 23 4f8• 12 NOTE:Shaded area does not meet 21 GPM.Mimimum Scouring Velocity for 2"pipe. PERFORMANCE CHART NOTE These charts show actual system performance with friction loss factored in for various discharge pipe lengths.Calculations and performance based on a system with 2"PVC,schedule 40 plastic pipe(C150),(4)900 elbows,(1)check valve and(1)shut-off valve. Wastewater requires a minimum scouring velocity of 21 gpm for 2"pipe.Shaded areas do not provide minimum scouring velocity use only for gray water with no solids. 2 II % TRANS.NO.: j tL CITY/TOWN: C G9Tck V i LL I APPLICANT: U0 V G E ADDRESS: 2-q'_ LG rr 66-ACW t?_o)40 DESIGN FLOW: gpd REVIEWED BY: M r c W n E L P. Peneej}v rXL DATE: 7-3 i-d l N/A OK NO GENERALtrr��° fir ky,' t !�° i xzk y � 4r s. k Mr {' s ��i..-�+���t Legal boundaries denoted 310 CMR 15.220(4)(a)] Street,Lot,tax parcel number and lot number noted on plan [310 CMR 15.220(4)(u)] Locus Provided 310 CMR 15.2204(t)] a� Plan proper scale?(1"=40'for plot plans, 1"=20'or fewer for components) [310 CMR 15.220(4)] Easements shown 310 CMR 15.220(4)(b)] System located totally on lot served [310 CMR 15.405(1)(a)for upgrades]-if not, a variance is required [310 CMR 15.412(4)] Location of impervious surfaces(driveways,parking areas etc.) [310 CMR 15.220(4)(d)] Location all buildings existing and proposed 310 CNM 15.220(4)(c)] Location and dimensions of system components and reserve areas. 310 CMR 15.220(4)(e)] System Calculations 310 CMR 15.220 4 daily flow septic tank capacity (required andprovided) soil absorption system (required andprovided) D/ whether system designed for garbage grinder wo- North arrow 310 CMR 15.220(4)(g)] a� Existing and ro osed contours 310 CMR 15.220(4)(g)] Location and log of deep observation holes(existing grade el. on each test) [310 CMR 15.220(4)(h)] Names of soil evaluator and BOH representative [310 CMR 15.220 4 h and i Location and date of percolation tests(performed at proper elevation?) [310 CMR 15.220(4)(i)] Percolation test results match loading rate? 310 CMR 15.242] Certification statement by Soil Evaluator 310 CMR 15.220(4)0)] Observed and Adjusted groundwater(method for adjustment given or indicated) [310 CMR 15.103(3)and 310 CNM 15.220(4)(n)] Address 2q3. e-om- 1v3e CP Rn� CEkT Vl a6 Sheet 1 of 7 t i N/A OK NO Location of every water supply,public and private, [310 CMR �. 15.220 4 within 400 feet of the proposed system location in the case of surface water supplies and gravel packed public water sup ly within 250 feet of the proposed system location in the case V*' within 150 feet of the proposed system location in the case of private water supply wells Location of all surface waters and wetlands located up to 100 ft. beyond setbacks listed in 310 CMR 15.211 and any catch basins located within 50 ft. 310 CMR 15.220(4)(1)] Water lines and other subsurface utilities located [310 CMR 15.220(4)(m)] (if water line cross see 310 CMR 15.211(1)[1]) Profile of system showing invert elevations of all system components and the bottom of the SAS 310 CMR15.220(4)(o)] Stamp of designer 310 CMR 15.220 1 and 310 CMR 15.220(2)] Stamp of Registered Land Surveyor(required if construction activities within 5 ft. of lot line) [310 CMR 15.220(3)] Test Holes adequate(two in each of the primary and reserve unless trenches as permitted in 310 CMR 15.102(2)or as approved for an upgrade under LUA at 310 CMR 15.405(1)(k)] Test hole adequate to demonstrate four feet of suitable material? - 310 CMR 15.103 4 Test Holes adequate to confirm adequate groundwater separation? 310 CMR 15.103(3)] (� Benchmark within 50-75' of system [310 CMR 15.220(4)O] 1- Materials specifications noted? [various sections of 310 CMR 15.000 System components not> 36"deep (unless Local Upgrade Approval or LUA requested) 310 CMR 15.405 1 b Address 2Q3 1,omk- L7�L�,1 KD„ Cewawa r Sheet 2 of 7 N/A OK NO SEPTIC TANIg "�� � � ��A.M.W try Size OK? 310 CMR 15.223(l)] Inlet tee located ten inches below flow line 310 CMR 15.227(6)] a� Outlet tee 14" or 14"+5"per foot for increase ft depth [310 CMR 15.227(6)] PA3T Outlet tee with gas baffle or approved filter [310 CMR 15.227(4)] Note regarding installation on stable compacted base [310 CMR 15.228(l)] P1 B 1r�i L Separation between inlet and outlet tees(no less than liquid depth) 310 CMR 15.22 7 2 Inlet/Outlet elevations at least 12"above high groundwater (except as described 310 CMR 15.227(5))or permitted for upgrades under LUA 310 CMR 15.405 1 ] Minimum cover 9" (Tanks buried more than 9"must have risers on all openings and on the d-box) [310 CMR 15.2228(1)and 310 V' CMR 15.232 3 Three access covers(inlet and outlet must be 20" or greater)- o/ middle access at least 8" 7/07 310 CMR 15.228(2)] F)%T Access to within 6 "of grade -one port for systems<1000gpd, two fors stems>1000 g d [310 CMR 15.228(2)] RM 7 All at-grade covers secured to unauthorized access? [310 CMR 15.228(2)] sPFC > 10 ft from building foundation 310 CMR 15.211 1 ✓' Buoyancy calculation Required/Done 310 CMR 15.221(8)] ate' - , H-20 Where appropriate? [310 CMR 15.226(3)] ✓' Setbacks from resources 310 CMR 15.211 1� rxH, zA�S 4�fi h t,c s '¢ x '7" `� �. - a s `�-w Mul`t� Compartmgnt Tank 05 , a �t F/4�S?� 0' 4 Si �,�'_E6!�117$ Required when other than single-family dwelling or flow>1000 g d 310 CMR 15.223 1 First compartment 200%daily flow; Second compartment 100% daily flow 310 CMR 1 5.224 2 and 3 "U"pipe through or over baffle, outlet of each compartment with as baffle or approved filter 310 CMR 15.224(4)] Address aC,j. -OIv G- BL' GN p,)Cuk7M0>>"6_ Sheet 3 of 7 NIA OK NO Located at least ten feet from any water line?[310 CMR 15.222(2)] Disposal piping at least 18" below water line(when water and sewer cross, see 310 CMR 15.211 1 1 Cleanouts required/provided ? 310 CMR 15.222(8)] ✓' Thrust blocks specified in force mains?310 CMR.15.221(6)(c)] Slope of sewer line not less than 0.01 (1/8"/ft) 0.02 preferable [310 CMR 15.222(6)] @� Proper pitch on:all runs?(.005 within gravity-distributed trenches and beds) [310 CMR 15.251(9)and 310 CMR 15.252(2)(c)] ✓Siphonproblem/ leachfield'below pump chamber u� Endca s or vent manifolds ecified? Size and orientation of discharge holes specified?(not smaller than 3/8"not larger than 5/8") [310 CMR 15.251(8)and 310 1� CMR 15.252(2)(h)] Materials specified (310 CMR 15.251(5)specifies various pipe types allowed DISTRIBUTION BOX i ,k { .3r, 3cvifi ' � }�� �� .'i i Stable compacted base [310 CMR 15.221(2)and 310 CMR 15.232(2)(a)] VII Splash plate or baffle tee required on inlet/provided?(when pressure sewer to d-box or steep pitch of gravity sewer) [310 CMR 15.323(3)(a)] Riser if deeper than 9" 310 CMR 15.232(3)(0) Inside minimum dimension 12" 310 CMR 15.232(2)(b)] Minimum sum 6" 310 CMR I5.232(3)(e)] o/ Watertight cover if<2000gpd);waterproof manhole if>2000gpd [310 CMR 15.232(3)(d)] .r ��Y -�za vu s�., (l r PIIMP CHAMBF RS.� s{ k� a q t ve t�3 bkt c Mrs J,.F .:e l.a,' .�a:,a. 's. J... ,�,'-.x.�-e;�tv..s'ZS. ..,,, �'°..o- �...�.k,..✓, .' Capacity (emergency storage above working=design flow)? [310 CMR 231 2 Proper setbacks [310 CMR 15.211 (same as septic tanks)] Watertight 20-in minium access manhole at least 20"MUST BE TO GRADE 310 CMR 15.231(5)] Service components accessible (not too deep with piping, disconnects accessible) Alarm floats-alarm on circuit separate from pumps specified? Exceeds two units must have two pumps.operating in lead-lag mode. 310 CMR 15.231.(6)and 8 ] Stable Compacted Base [310 CMR 15.221(2)] Buoyancy calculations needed ?Provided? 310 CMR 15.221(8 Address ?N3 to"&: ggwN Rp, Cc-j7c71U/GLe Sheet4of7 N/A OK NO SOIL"ABSORPT IONSYSTEMS(SAS}GE°NEvt B `� � � � Calculations correct? 4 feet of naturally occurring material demonstrated? [310 CMR 15.240(l)], Required separation togroundwater? 310 CMR 15.212)] 6/ Aggregate specified as double washed [310 CMR 15.247(2)] No ZrT 5 Y57eM System Venting required/provided?(system under driveway or >36" deep) 310 CMR 15.241] Inspection ports specified and within.3"final grade?[310 CMR 15.240(13) Breakout requirements met?(No violation of breakout elevation within 15 ft of SAS unless barrier) [310 CMR 15.211(1)[4] and Guidance Document GALLERIES PITS CHAMBERS310C1VIIr15`253 ` gn >ablf= Chambers and Gal. in trench configuration supplied with inlet t every 20 ft. 310 CMR 15.253 6 Each structure with one inspection manhole(if>2000 gpd must be tograde) 310 CMR 15.253(2)] Aggregate 1'minimum-4'maximum. 310 CMR 15.253 l 2' sidewall credit maximum 310 CMR 15.253(1)(a In bed configuration, inlet every 40 s . ft. 310 CMR 15.253(6)] 1TRENCHES310C1VIR135 Width T minimum 3'maximum 310 CMR 15.251 1 b ate' 100 feet-maximum length 310 CMR 15.251 1 a a/ Minimum separation2x effective depth or width whichever greater 3x if reserve between trenches 310 CMR 251 1 d ,e Situated along,contours 310 CMR 15.251(2)] ✓ Breakout OK? 310 CMR 15.211 1 4 and Guidance Document minimum 2 distribution lines 310*CMR 15.252(2)(a)] ✓' Maximum separation between lines 6' 310 CM R15.252(2)(d)] o/ Maximum separation between lines and outside of bed 4' [310 CMR 15.252(2)(e)] Aggregate depth below discharge pipes 6"minimum, 12" maximum. [310 CMR 15.252(2)( )] Separation between beds 10'minimum. 310 CMR 15.252(2)(0] Bottom area used in calculations only 310 CMR 15.252(2)(i)] P�v i26G� C-l-1NM 72I FI -tD C0NF-16. Address z q3 LO&6- geprufl PO- C-c >/uc Sheet 5 of 7 N/A OK NO DID.THEsPLAN� ���{'� ,`.K�, wz_ ..�.. Pressure Dosed System ? Provided pump and piping calculations as required 310 CMR 15.220(4)(r)] Pressure dosing required on all systems>2000gpd or alternative systems under remedial approval [310 CMR 15.254(2)and I/A Remedial Use Approvals] If used in gravelless system -make sure jet is directed as not to �. scour soil interface Guidance Document Inspections once per year(systems<2000 gpd)or quarterly >2000 d)good to note on plan 310 CMR 15.254(2)(d)] Construction in fill -Did the plan specify that the fill shall meet the specification of 310 CMR 15.255(3)? Impervious barrier and/or retaining wall ? Guidance Document] Impervious barrier installation must be supervised by designer 310 CMR 15.255(2)(b)] Retaining wall must be designed by Registered Professional Engineer[310 CNIR 15.255(2)(a)] V1 Side slope not exceed 3.1 ? 310 CMR 15.255(2)] Breakout requirements met? [310 CMR 15.252(2)and Guidance Document] At least 5 ft. from impervious barrier to edge of SAS (10 ft. recommended) [310 CMR 15.255 2 (e) - Check DEP Approval letters for credits and design conditions If used with pressure dosing do not allow pressure discharge to scour soil interface AlternartvesSe ttC'is stern I/A A` rovalLettersF' �� � ` �`£ Was DEP Approval Letter provided and/or have you reviewed the letter for conditions? U® Is the technology being properly applied and does it meet all DEP Approval Conditions? Is there a note on the plan regarding the requirement for ✓ � perpetual maintenance agreement? Any alarms involved on separate circuits Did the applicant submit an operation and maintenance --- manual? Hasa licant submitted a co of a maintenanc r'O �'° '' ` VIP Vlll'l_Q71CCS ` s r 4 w7' " ra*rig" ati ma r s ff t V,F.. s�''w�.. 'r.s,. 'r' ,.!z: � u'# '. '.' � :nk .`. x-. ',. ` Are the variances listed on the plan ? [310 CMR 15.220 4 ) RLS Stamp necessary on plan if a component is within five feet of roe line [310 CMR 15.412(4)] New construction or increased flow proposed [Refer to 310 CMR 15.414] Address 1.0", genc,( BCD, Co.�;rwwa, Sheet 6 of 7 N/A OK NO a tia os _ n c c NatrogenfiSensitrveAreri Ml � � � ' � M � �� �. �� _ , Is the system in a Designated Nitrogen Sensitive Area(Zone II for a public supply well)? [310 CMR 15.214, 310 CMR 15.215 and 310 CMR 15.216-also refer to Policy regarding upgrades of such existing systems] Is the system proposed on the same lot as served by private well ? 310 CMR 15.214(2)] Are the nitrogen loads proposed in compliance? [310 CMR 15.216 1 Pumping to septic tank? [310 CMR 15.229 Shared System 310 CMR 15.290 A. Address Cim-renotl t- ,4 � Sheet 7 of 7 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY&ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617.292-5500 DEVAL L.PATRICK LAN A.BOWLES Governor Secretary TIMOTHY P.MURRAY ARLEEN O'DONNELL Lieutenant Governor Commissioner MODIFIED CERTIFICATION FOR GENERAL USE Pursuant to Title 5,310 CMR 15.000 Name and Address of Applicant: Infiltrator Systems,Inc. P.O. Box 768 6 Business Park Road Old Saybrook,CT 06475 Trade name of technology and model: High Capacity chamber,Quick4 High Capacity chamber, Standard chamber,Quick4 Standard chamber,Infiltrator 3050(Storm Tech SC-740),Equalizer 24 chamber,Quick4 Equalizer 24 chamber,Equalizer 36 chamber,and Quick4 Equalizer 36 chamber (hereinafter the"System'). Schematic drawings of the System and a design and installation manual are attached and made a part of this Certification Transmittal Number: W023699 Date of Issuance: February 21,2003,Revised August 19,2005,December 22,2005,July 24, 2006,July 19,2007 Authority for Issuance Pursuant to Title 5 of the State Environmental Code, 310 CMR 15.000, the Department of Environmental Protection hereby issues this Certification to: Infiltrator Systems,Inc., P.O. Box 768, 6 Business Park Road,Old Saybrook,CT 06475(hereinafter"the Company'),for General Use of the System described herein. Sale and use of the System are conditioned on and subject to compliance by the Company and the System owner with the terms and conditions set forth below. Any noncompliance with the terms or conditions of this Certification constitutes a violation of 310 CMR 15.000. July 19,2007 Glenn Haas,Acting Assistant Commissioner Date Bureau of Resource Protection Department of Environmental Protection This hformadon is avaBaMe In atteraste format Ca0 Domld X Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617-5561057.TDD Service-1-800-298-2207. MassDEP on the World Wide Web: httpJAvww.rress.gov/dep 0 Prirted on Recycled Paper ll`tf�-::'.Ml ft I"T'li rt:r t.ilr,1�! lr IN ` E'i e .1f• ' . Elt. + .`i �✓ r' ! -. i •' ,l��§1 ,.Y! .� i(r„•if '} t- , E"E , , ' '.� ;- - r .'.iSi/..: t:^,o'I': who n fit. wlr �esl .i:rrt:r►., .r3fr.tii;trrS r,V t"Ut{ b•'�.IF�;cl?FI i?:£, s°E�i ,t�(1rnGrEa rJi�^t{E:.' rl�sl-1 t•.l-�ir'C1 .s.r;rnryr,.J !)Eas3rlr'� (It�il-! 'f:si3otr lTf�l; r�{• ,�,,,,_ ' �v .<rt,::€ vi; -i"LOW aM PAW k1`3E'iq lbtia ,'1Wndw '1`. E,.3'>:Eiiirlp i s'tirllr da V'i"'Ndi;S3pi #-✓13 O) ;i:itjr171 6 r .if (: €S:y rfl,,°l4`.�f 11;;ii it! litii fly+ ,U is tbt:f: rrlwic,tr? `}ft$ i'l c rYr[rf,if? u.t. rra`.rt i ltt� c 1t1*' "l' lz1"lwigl:iI0 frt71t1;;:3ktl't�,)r+`Ei `rl F'!.`r r: f)(;fft �JElli fs;�• "1 . 4h;.,rc,)v' f,ttrtl�s� 1s,3.Etr[;-`rss 't"T POO, '01 J rfuujll 6-W114 ,,.00E A unnsztlm 101 100ijui. b 1r unalfirjuO :;ri .00M( 11;!0 01 r No! li;Invonad ivj w I .t_• 4P t T xuet! lr;rt\ /';d .O.q ..-jot ejtl:App e 1t11 llSl:fl's ')! Irl,,. : li rt! r t III it. .E , 1i T. Aefi(� :Cl i 3rEE�tl 1Flr})pJ:ogplu,?li`S!i so itj(d'_"jlnou me (T{"ea"t M 56%`.,?.ur bar, ;rle? .o-,I✓ff l?An,-e".) rrs�. _J.E l'ry 11161 2wtlt!]iittj lift[; CollS A An un ldv t1yw§ a i! � 3 r} Swt 1' f,�.' ' . �,lE 311,4D Olr lco floihG!Iil l 6 �-.AlljjlE llrJ7 n+:+tiCOW eAl i+J Mousnowly 2rr1' i A ou JfA1li4rtif)'MwT And d a Wlu�i � rfr iri`"i;'t .t- � . ''.•I � i / .. ffrfr; .� ( tad 1 A., . . ^i,! .P sHri-(-i�it^:•ti:(.i1!'s."''"f d?%Tf,Is r,;,,vfn.r,.1 T tfi �-Nr°...! !f G!tcnrrlf tL:.3.Y.:,,i,,,....t7 1.;.st.' ,: ,.1..r i!craxda+;;13,i I Infiltrator Modred Certification for General Use Page 2 of 7 I. Purpose 1. The purpose of this Certification is to allow use of the System in Massachusetts, on a General Use basis. 2. With the necessary permits and approvals required by 310 CMR 15.000, this Certification authorizes the use of the System in Massachusetts. 3. The System may be installed on all facilities where a system in compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 exists on site or could be built and for which a site evaluation in compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 has been approved by the local approving authority, or by DEP if DEP approval is required by 310 CMR 15.000. II. Design Standards 1. The models listed in Table 1 are covered under this Certification. Table 1. Chamber Dimensions Dimensions Invert Model W x L x H Height Inches Inches Equalizer 24 15 x 100 x 11 6 uick4 Equalizer 24 16 x 48 x 11 6 Equalizer 36 22 x 100 x 13.5 6 uick4 Equalizer 36 22 x 48 x 12 6 Standard Chamber 34 x 75 x 12 — 6.5 _ u cW Standard 34 x 48_x 12 —8 J Infiltrator 3050 or 51 x 85.4 x 30 24 StormTech SC-740 High Capacity Chamber 1 34 x 75 x 16 1 11 uick4 High Capacity 34 x 48 x 16 11.5 2. The System is an open-bottom leaching unit molded from polyolefin resin. It can be installed without aggregate or distribution pipe as an absorption trench'in accordance with the requirements in 310 CMR 15.251 or as a bed or field in accordance with the requirements in 310 CMR 15.252. 3. The use of aggregate as specified in 310 CMR 15.247 is not necessary with the System when installed as a trench, bed or field. When designed with aggregate in accordance with 310 CMR 15.253, the System shall be designed in accordance with Section II item 10. ru v!5le'la t.fij lo ',,ev .11011f, (d el dlfi! ?is nd `)29 f, 11r) i to I 2 1 14-D 0 1 icjprn- -e I wioik�I q,�; blor� eitf,i-vir, i -w I I V rio If 13 o In:.j 31i�. t, fili'l 1; -Ic� bf it, flP A A b I w)i ij ot iz i.,() zj tiz:�, W O t ,3F,f fo-7qq.c. 11!nof wil in-A ari o0o.e'-! AV'_ :-W�. 11!i-ii 000 P,I 311,4f 11 01 C Id b3impf)I ;,Ile lclaqtqt 1,T]o'If BC! ./d lo ;iriudliz -elflj w b-,ID in:)ans fit, j!",bom AT It �f mt,tilt; C." Pilo "j)I on I ay..) v it f I"";ri rrc o 1 od "':)c o (11 f. fl i fl, fit TL,-,v1j 'to 11JO141"; -i th ;i ic, b;;-,.' r, rf,, -i,r lij f Iry It C,i fit Inj I e,' tii w mill bl5it -.,o Alwtot Il n b9lio-41all r."WiR "'WAe oe t Infiltrator Modified Certification for General Use Page 3 of 7 4. The minimum separation between any two trenches shall be as specified in 310 CMR 15.251. 5. The requirement that the Chamber installed in trench configuration as specified in 310 CMR 15.253(6)be provided with inlets at intervals not to exceed 20 feet is not applicable to the System.In accordance with 310 CMR 15.240(13)a minimum of one inspection inlet shall be installed per system The inlet shall be capped with a screw type cap and accessible to within three inches of finish grade. 6. The total effective leaching area for any Chamber Model shall be calculated by multiplying the Effective Leaching Area per square foot of chamber times the total length of chamber from end cap to end cap including end caps. 7. For new construction, the applicant can size the System in a trench configuration without aggregate, using the effective leaching areas presented in Table 2. No System,however, shall be designed and constructed with a soil absorption system area of less than 400 square feet of effective area Table 2.Effective Leaching Area for New Construction And Remedial Sites' Effective Effective Model Leaching2 Leachinj Area Area SF/LF SF/LF Equalizer 24 3.75 NA t uick4 Equalizer 24 3.90 NA Equalizer 36 4.73 NA uick4 Equalizer 36 4.73 NA Standard Chamber 6.53 NA uick4 Standard 6.96 NA Infiltrator 3050 or NA 74 StormTech SC-740 I-ligh Capacity Chamber 1 7.79 NA uick4 ffigh Capacity 7.93 1 NA 1. Effective April 21,2006,310 CMR 15.251(1)(b)maximum trench width is 3 feet. 2. Effective leaching area is equal to 1.67(bottom width+(2x invert height))for Systems 3 feet or less in width. 3. Effective leaching area is equal to 1.0 (3 +(2x invert Height)) for Systems with a width greater then 3 feet. 4. The maximum trench width allowed to calculate effective leaching area is 3 feet. rn lilt' fu Al boRmye Co noMigRanD Hansa rni lui! lfijuw)-iiopvl• tAT ".)j l�n3 lf,,lwvl v m0n it I If bbbilulki v! It) el ,,,l Mi")Off- 11 htl ) 1 0 E An (A ffli'le 1? ifi10A VdF im", 1�q I.Sen I A i lade 150 MR 11 UK w5A nAh m of Mams Me 'd AWK Sel [lad? 1-bol"A /m, ic;l uq-u; -2mdr!A 1wol -wi r 6 fl; e, f I i 1 .1�j d(f"..,"ff'.) I c"61. tj p a 1.w.j 0 Ff 0 1 q i'i i ,pabu!:mi qc. 05 of qK) btt'� flJO 11 7df,'lG;b'jk1 ffj�rVjtl 1 r! )j a n, nw 'Al ion'l "I anau wl; noitqot,!n lv)2P iiji Us 9bW d l%QwA momjnu . ;;,)-in 5 �o mll maya MA lindl awl ig SUIC AWMA uO 1 W w 0 t on Ans i 9 AMU I Adv A yr (IN I 0"Wir- T Infiltrator Modified Certification for General Use Page 4 of 7 8. Systems installed on remedial sites shall be allowed to utilize the effective leaching areas presented in Table 2 above or additional reductions in soil absorption leaching area approved by the approving authority in accordance with 310 CMR 15.284. In no instance shall the reduction in the soil absorption system required in 310 CMR 15.242 exceed the maximum reduction allowed for alternative systems approved in accordance with 310 CMR 15.284. 9. In accordance with 310 CMR 15.240 (6) absorption trenches should be used whenever possible. When the System is installed for new construction without aggregate in a bed or field configuration, as defined in 310 CMR 15.252, the System shall be designed using the effective leaching area for the bottom width presented in Table 3. No system shall be designed and constructed with a leaching area of less than 400 square feet of effective area. Table 3. Effective Leaching Area for Bed or Field Configuration Effective Model Leaching' Area SF/LF Equalizer 24 2.08 uick4 Equalizer 24 2.23 Equalizer 36 3.05 uick4 Equalizer 36 3.05 Standard,Chamber— 4.72 -uick4-Standards 4.72 Infiltrator 3050 or StormTech SC-740 High Capacity Chamber 1 4.72 uick4 High Capacity 4.72 1. Effective Leaching area is equal to 1.67 times bottom width only. 10. The System, when installed in a bed or field configuration without aggregate on remedial sites,shall utilize the effective leaching areas presented in Table 3 above or additional reductions in soil absorption system area approved by the approving authority in accordance with 310 CMR 15.284. In no instance shall the reduction in the soil absorption system area required in 310 CMR 15.242 exceed the maximum reduction allowed for alternative systems approved in accordance with 310 CMR 15.284. 11. The System, when installed as specified in 310 CMR 15.253: Pits, Galleries, or Chambers, shall have an aggregate base and/or be surrounded by aggregate and shall be sized as specified in 310 CMR 15.253 (1) (a) and (b), effective leaching T!,j i,\lbljj (,1 .9 III efloil�jbjl havollibibE., to i 1"AL S 5!d;;T ri Ao ti"o-mal; xi h!, 5"1! of Ft01,1,,abn jilt I Wri,� `.'If:-I?C6 On n'. 411 I(A bl- 7016; b,, 311,4D 01 F t4i-,i ru biiJod;o --mbre'l! filw'm r),df, o) 0�2.�t i P1 I"'Ira lvori,l�it (1-DOU'liefm item 161 it ffm,-ave` 'Ifil w9f(Vrl .Al motlod 5rh -wl .:,:.Tr. 1-ciin-tc-A JI, !3-nimff fx)"glnb-- ,L)d fluff? ITJ51-, !Pin W-J; 8 041 Z t'dfT m it, 1;,j i i k, r. f v. ,04r lol,F11" 'all ivi-,ji Jd 11'J" Fit Infiltrator Modified Certification for General Use Page 5 of 7 area is equal to 1.0 times a conventional aggregate system.. Effective depth can be increased up to two feet with the corresponding addition of up to 14 inches of base aggregate. Bottom width can be increased by two to eight SF/LF with the corresponding addition of one to four feet of aggregate per side. 12. When the System is installed as specified in 310 CMR 15.255: Construction in Fill, the finished 15 foot horizontal separation distance, item (2), shall be measured from the from the top of the chamber. III. General Conditions 1. All provisions of 310 CMR 15.000 are applicable to the use of the System, except those that specifically have been varied by the terms of this Certification. 2. The facility served by the System, and the System itself, shall be open to inspection and sampling by the Department and the local approving authority at all reasonable times. 3. In accordance with applicable law, the Department and the local approving authority may require the owner of the System to cease use of the System and/or to take any other action as it deems necessary to protect public health, safety, welfare or the environment. 4. The Department has not determined that the performance of the System will provide a level of protection to the environment that is at least equivalent to that of a sewer. Accordingly,no new System shall be constructed,and no System shall be upgraded or expanded, if it is feasible to connect the facility to a sanitary sewer,unless allowed pursuant to 310 CMR 15.004. 5. Design, installation and use of the System shall be in strict conformance with the Company's DEP approved plans and specifications and 310 CMR 15.000, subject to this Certification. IV. Conditions Applicable to the System Owner 1. The System is approved for the treatment and disposal of sanitary sewage only. Any wastes that are non-sanitary sewage generated or used at the facility served by the System shall not be introduced into the on-site sewage disposal system and shall be lawfully disposed of. 2. For new construction, the owner initially shall size a soil absorption system in accordance with 310 CMR 15.242 to demonstrate that a conventional Title 5 soil adsorption system using aggregate, including a reserve area, can be installed on the site. The owner may than size the soil absorption system for the System The total area required for the aggregate system, which may include the area designated for the System, and a reserve area shall be preserved and the owner shall ensure that no permanent structures or other structures are constructed on that area and that the area is not disturbed in any manner that will render it unusable for future installation of a conventional Title 5 soil absorption system J; d'mit 0" itA14 ?,I r',", amixt; f 4 qu 10 n 'hobb lirif rlhtf lit;', 0111 ot fill n a/I! Id lx.:r.5-v5rit ,,fl n,;-,) tilbi it mciM8 A , ar jar ni 1)t)ji'txq,7 Pm b`jllrjerjt -ab i-A1/1 how M, 4wWal noonuqva pJaymm! Oro U bails' nn IN JR, ITAUS A 10 q0J 501 l"110-11 WP M(If! of iq IIA I 10 to 0: A in Onc I wd a Ina Qufo Doq 1 IMP smil ,,I fjjqo ,,-I Had� rtls-jz1,9 ,dl bnL msm<2 Q yd hat 16hao Uln' 10 putun jai 101qqw full! 5111 bw; c hia.: w!) bim 1finfai1q,-Al iw ! =12 sifilo ja,u oi :)11110 !:Mill.) 'MI 'It .011,;9A �)jlducl 1-*knq of "aumun amob ji af� fwt;:12 lwll'lo �.fti. '.'A;;] trivaa(ya; -,,rh io f.?0 ki-it ihm rV91212 0111 10 vii ;L(l) tort a,�A' tmw,,mq,u 5rrr wrIf o) villp., latil In A Jefli Irl-wilf-vill i`wj edj 01 fiowx�ivlq 10 !")1151 ; '-1)1,10-liq fm limp. Knuvanuo A SWe fawevE wi,,,ri -rt, bob�;qn io so bt tioN, SAj s5riurmulm) ;-mu ill Al Nf:6 ,r7tl?.Jr riljln 5?.i1 brc noitc.Upierii, bite 2 ncii.ln:)�i s5ri� bim Fric 1(i ibr�i oiqqr, 11---1 q. 2'if-sifjf tiro :0"0 wycage it/ lanqmb bnc M5mnm-,,., orll iol mt;32_P .+rlt Jo Lai io -,grjtf` fv)l; ti-.ii" i(,A bas rnsl?.le luo%0)f);y;itui.toile-fie 9t11 Ulfli bj.)ubowll ad mn IMS nlwp it A 'd 10 -A kcild in mWag Im"(poedn 11r)e 13 am- )Ut, tIflnitlm 1"willo -,(; flolj3lnJd11rJ':i w'fi lol !W? 1011 wwwavinvialcd! ')J 3H/D OiE 61111 an LiMad bd no t; r, "rillml-mi pi;vj im'12.i2 ""'Otlq"fJ261; `�"01 m5",/�" U& 161 nwiqi+..,dj!, wii m0t nxi lou itr, jf.q J"T.1 riblibm -lfim Sill 661 b�)-iiijpai i;�,ic 1�rilcij TAI.M) Aft bri, L,,mjo-xw rd a bni; 901 lr;t fit} bwwwrioo sic ellumulls ISTO w Of( tEd) j1b?W;. MCde, Hitt IrA -itildir-ai vi-i, fu b,.rhi;J?ib imi %i r:.av tAi won b,,w imlqiwdr, 02 k AT lanwint) n-ju now.bf.,Ieni ')-wmll-ioj jldu iiftlj I Infiltrator Modred Certification for General Use Page 6 of 7 3. The owner of the System shall at all times properly operate and maintain the on- site sewage disposal system. 4. The owner shall furnish the Department any information that the Department requests regarding the operation and performance of the System, within 21 days of the date of receipt of that request. 5. No owner shall authorize or allow the installation of the System other than by a person trained by the Company to install the System V. Conditions Applicable to the Company 1. By January 31st of each year, the Company shall submit to the Department a report, signed by a corporate officer, general partner, or Company owner that contains information on the System for the previous calendar year. The report shall state known failures, malfunctions, and corrective actions taken for the System as well as the date and address of each event. 2. The Company shall notify the Department's Director of Watershed Permitting at least 30 days in advance of any proposed transfer of ownership of the technology for which this Certification is issued. Said notification shall include the name and address of the proposed new owner and a written agreement between the existing and proposed new owner containing a specific date for transfer of ownership, responsibility, coverage and liability between them. All provisions of this Certification applicable to the Company shall be applicable to successors and assigns of the Company,unless the Department determines otherwise. 3. The Company shall furnish the Department any information that the Department requests regarding the System, within 21 days of the date of receipt of that request. 4. Prior to any sale of the System, the Company shall provide the purchaser with a copy of this Certification. In any contract for distribution or sale of the System, the Company shall require the distributor or seller to provide the purchaser of the System,prior to any sale of the System, with a copy of this Certification. 5. The Company shall prepare an installation manual specifically detailing procedures for installation of its System. The Company shall institute and maintain a training program in the proper installation of its System in accordance with the manual and provide a training course at least annually for prospective installers. The Company shall certify that installers have passed the Company's training qualifications, maintain a list of certified installers, submit a copy to the Department, and update the list annually. Updated lists shall be forwarded to the Department. -fyc) !-w fliclmixti ban way tuquy cbmil Un in fvj2i,2 tAi'if) J111,,je InDrulln(p(l 9111 i,nd) ilowmiolry nf, immicli'l Al diptmkil IL-H, vjo.,.,o e tab 1 S Kim Aj'!0 summAtcl im'; rt")"Ir itjqo w!t wjijp-,l ii�ralc jo, n id M My wef orb In mmUcan, vdi wok io smodwa W many u/ juRqM3 At v,v 16(1,;lb�:) ?ijovf?,q vrit 10 o,,4 no fiohj:rTIlrsifll "MIGiNji Mq,,q df�ot,-!o ?e4-ibbE Ime web ?.,,, f1w, ?j, frw?ota e'xz,;ff lzq`.Q -'Iffi ilmiq llnfl? wIT 10 rlifizi-willo,10 -1jiM011 WW,Xj0Iq jPL 10 tit e/,A) QS. fe-8--1 I'on sman 50 colwanoon Wo? Ima".; zi "'.. :I& dDid,1, vA gmu�,iz:, wit Mamsmgc nwhiii c Imn -s5fi110 aon b9c0qrjjq "evibbf; Quon U0 10 Wermli �(;j !","ni) li ;tyll-If jfl():; 1w.;oo r. 'to Ww"J "d it quanos w;l 0! �to f C' wh qjnqffjo�j Ailfj !PVfff q fmawyAl us Iwo ImuctrVAN sio toprutl flade inqmUS OF iaff.) ls:`. 10 smb A 10 P jcb f 1 AM -Al A Wlolq ITS, w ,M0112 ON 10 Ida 10 noludhijb A -f;lloo7 l:lc fit f1r.111c:)"1lys wiij A miq w 1t,1152 -lo !.�Aj llcmle ejfbfilo qow c thou it, wil lo, i.im, 01-iortq vv,�l Qo.,-lwq2 Wu ern noklhum u.; :'tlfl twumf Fit 10 lv,Of-lclaw -;"A wunablow ni mulef 2,11 lc: flol"Mirlarl:loqoa! 3,11 fli E mm(Iffarl wimayaq wl + Vnf,,mw !?rsl Alil" wstfl 0j Illn-wrint; Jed wil f);sbqU bi.13 i Infiltrator Modified Certification for General Use Page 7 of 7 6. The Company shall not sell the System to installers unless they are trained to install these Systems by the Company. VI. Conditions Applicable to Installers of the System 1. Each Installer shall install the System in accordance with Company training on the installation of the System and the conditions of this Certification. 2. No Installer shall install the System unless the Installer has been trained by the Company on installation of the System VII. Reporting 1. All submittals of notices and documents to the Department required by this Certification shall be submitted to: Director Wastewater Permitting Program Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street-5th floor Boston,Massachusetts 02108 VIH. Rights of the Department 1. The Department may suspend, modify or revoke this Certification for cause, including, but not limited to, non-compliance with the terms of this Certification, non-payment of an annual compliance assurance fee, for obtaining the Certification by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts or any change.in or discovery of conditions that would constitute grounds for discontinuance of the Certification, or as necessary for the protection of public health, safety, welfare or the environment, and as authorized by applicable law. The Department reserves its rights to take any enforcement action authorized by law with respect to this Certification, the System, the owner, or operator of the System and the Company. ot �pw -dnrft awnu m(i1. eni Ul mwp.,P2 .)Jt flr);,z qmqnOD to Y rowelz qdI la %iffman! ct, f1c, ""milflim) 01MUMOSOC "I rn,1212 56, Won HK 15101M And 5di id Quir.? a%JA Uld mumal all m Sh vd btuiupui lnsumcquG A EO MhjiC,jnb bflf; 4tniiov wl baAndue ad 110 fmashain uolu&M Imummm mRIG mmucfeCI VD mommq 'Ic-21 N) mmu IT -,m liflur plunt.firdo o 0 .101 If'orml-, w� 'I -� -r; V; fl If;{ Mr lQ W mmb fin MA wimb �J vt"wv,aw 10 w upn% mr, Im, !Drh ''(' n,O Almrit)d rd ifa%n"jv,1w) ju its! cm wrQi-, idj 10 01!mi(jo -1J 3on no A Mgu not t%:)iI ?,;fij (')I Im I un INCORPORATE D OWNER'S MANUAL FOR USE WITH BIO-MICROBICS, INC. FAST® WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS IMPORTANT: We urge you to fully read this manual. The contents are important to your safety and the operation of the Bio-Microbics,Inc. wastewater treatment system. Keep this manual with other important household manuals for future reference. FAST System Serial Number: System Designer Name: Designer Phone: Health Official Name: Health Official Phone: Manufacturer Name: Bio-Microbics, Inc. Manufacturer Phone: 1-800-753-FAST (3278) Installed By: Installer Phone: Maintenance Provider Name: Maintenance Provider Phone: Revised March 2007 24 ,r' /'`� �� �..' 4 NOTES TABLE OF CONTENTS WarningLabels...........................................................................3-4 Dangers............................................................................................4 Warnings.........................................................................................5 Introduction.....................................................................................5 How FAST®Systems Work............................................................6 SystemComponents....................................................................7-9 Underground Treatment System...............................................7 ControlPanel........................................................................7-8 Identification Plate....................................................................8 BlowerHousing.................................................................... 8-9 Introducing Substances into the System....................................9-12 Prohibited Substances.............................................................10 Limited-Use Substances .........................................................11 Acceptable Substances............................................................12 System Maintenance and Monitoring...................................... 12-15 TheSeptic Tank.............................................................................15 AlarmWarning........................................................................ 15-16 Blower Stoppage or Electrical Power Outage...............................16 Flooding.................................................................................. 16-17 Evaluation of System Performance...............................................17 Intermittent Use....................................................................... 17-18 Abandonment or Decommissioning..............................................18 Specifications................................................................................18 Important Phone Numbers.............................................................18 Warranty........................................................................................19 FAST®Installation Components Diagram.............................. 20-21 Index..............................................................................................22 2 23 t INDEX THANK YOU for choosing a FAST wastewater treatment system for your wastewater treatment needs. Bio-Microbics cares about your safety and satisfaction. Please take the time to read the information in Abandonment, 18 Warning labels, 3-4 this manual. Safe and proper operation of your FAST system will ensure Acceptable substances, 12 Warnings, 5 long product life. Alarm, 8, 12, 13, 15, 16 Warranty, 10, 19 Animal fats, 10 WARNING LABELS Bleach, 11-12 These warning labels are located on the control panel and blower Blower housing, 5, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, housing. You must follow the information on these labels to ensure your 16 Blower stoppage, 16 safety. Chemicals, 10-11 Control panel, 7-9, 13, 15 Corn cobs, 11 Dangers,4 1 ' Decommissioning, 18 Detergents, 11-13 ELECTRICAL HAZARD. a AL Disinfectants, 10 Disconnect power before Drain cleaners, 10 servicing. Failure to do so Electrical power outage, 16 may result in electrical shock FIOOdIrig, 16 causing serious bodily Injury or death. Gasoline, 10 Thir unit it to be r imd enb by trained end certified Bio-microbk.t-Imid.. Identification plate, 8 Limited-use substances, 9, 11 Melon rinds, 11 Motor oil, 10 Located on the Blower Housing Intermittent Use, 17-18 Paint, 10 Paint thinner, 10 A WARNING Paper products, 10 / Pesticides, 10 BIOHAZARD. re NOT attempt to service components your ML of the Single Home FASTS treatment malty yours"".cell your Single Home FAST0 servla mehrtletan.PMentlally helaonly trained.ea a er wseta matter ero Phone numbers, 19 BIOHAZARD i�n� a� riaa oeerva�yc,ruseil btled ey""Ce 4 5 7 unauthorized personnel may result In death or bodily Injury. Pipes Only arrthorlzed—,A—personnel ero to remove cap.on pips or covere Plastic, 1 O on the septic tank. Removal by unauthorized personnel may result In d"ath or bodlty Injury from potentlelly hazardous gases and waste matter. Prohibited substances, 9-10 DO HOT allow child-n to climb or play around this equipment. Pump-out, 6, 7, 9, 11, 15 Fagure to do ao may result In falls or other.--ts auaing sad=bodily Injury. Septic tank, 5-7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16 The veebrerd unit an b.d.m.g.d by pl-j g h—s y llama en the gfourM above the t.nlc y.hlelr wslghing more Shwa laeg pounds per wheel(a fully loaded Pl�k"p Huck)ahouW nW bs Specifications, 1 8 d.".-k ens es.on.w pip". _ FaST1•eo mi.dmba m.n.k a mm.ya m d» System diagram,6 The arse,w a w eound the FAST"end purnp pipe must t r so eir—enter on,housing.Do NOT.lbw,dsbns or other objects.Including ddfdng snow or lea•to eovsr the bower housing.Whon mewing,direct debris trom the mdw.r.wey from the blower sousing. Toilet paper, 12 Treatment tank, 7, 8, 17 22 3 ELECTRICAL"AZARD. Electrical equipment located In flooded " areas presents an elect icel hazard. Should the unit become _ flooded.Call your Big-Microbics,Inc. emlice technician. Do not enter a flooded area. Failure to do so may result in F electric shock causing death or serious bodily injury. !] There Ore buried electric cables Located near this equipment. Contactyour Bio-Microbics,inc. servicetechnician bebre — Tff...l — digging above or now am treatment syatem. Failure to do so — -,?-,7�r may result In electric shock causing death or serious bodily Injury. ' (BY OTHERS) PIPING AND Located on the Blower Housing ELECTRICAL CONDUIT (BY OTHERS) IMPORTANT INFORMATION Please read and follow the cautionary notes given below and those found elsewhere in this manual. If you have questions regarding the safety or operation of your FAST® Wastewater Treatment System, contact your authorized Bio-Microbics service technician. OUTLET PIPE (BY OTHERS) 'I = GASKET, 6" DANGERS 2 = GASKET, 2" 3a = LID (or FEET) 1. Electrical equipment located in flooded areas presents an electrical SEPTIC TANK 3b = FEET (or LID) hazard. Should the unit become flooded, call your Bio-Microbics (BY OTHERS) 4 = FAST(@ INSERT service technician. Do not enter a flooded area. Entering a flooded area may result in electrical shock causing death or serious bodily 5 = BLOWER injury. f = BLOWER HOUSING 2. There are buried pipes and electric cables located near this equipment. Contact your authorized Bio-Microbics service 7 = ALARM PANEL technician before digging above or near the treatment system. Failure to do so may result in electrical shock causing death or serious bodily injury. 4 21 Typical FASTe Installation Components WARNINGS (Actual installed components subject to design specifications) 1. DO NOT attempt to service components of the FAST wastewater treatment system yourself, call your authorized Bio-Microbics service technician. 2. Only authorized service personnel are to remove caps on pipes or covers on the septic tank. Removal by unauthorized personnel may result in death or bodily injury from potentially hazardous gases and waste matter. 3. DO NOT allow children to play on or around the vents and blower 6" DIA PIPE VENT housing. Such play may result in falls or other accidents causing (BY OTHERS) serious bodily injury. 4. Ice may form around vents during cold weather. Use caution when walking in these areas to avoid falling,causing serious bodily injury. 5. Anyone coming in contact with wastewater must remove any contaminated clothing and thoroughly wash all body areas and 3a clothing exposed to wastewater with soap and water. Then consult a physician to minimize the risk of illness. 6. The treatment unit can be damaged by placing heavy items on the ground above the tank. Vehicles heavier than a lawn tractor should not be driven in the area surrounding the FAST system to minimize the risk of damage to the septic tank and associated piping (unless the septic tank has been specially designed for use under roadways). 7. The area around the blower housing and vents must be clear so air�7can enter the housing. Do NOT allow debris or other objects, including drifting snow or ice,to cover the blower housing or vents. When mowing, direct debris from the mower away from the blower housing and vents. 4 INTRODUCTION Thank you for choosing a FAST wastewater treatment system for your home. The system is compatible with garbage disposals (see note on p. 11), dishwashers and other household appliances. The MicroFAST 0.5, 0.75, 0.9 and 1.5 systems have been tested and certified by NSF International to meet NSF Standard 40, Class 1. 20 5 HOW FAST®TREATMENT SYSTEMS WORK LIMITED 24-MONTH WARRANTY FAST stands for Fixed Activated Sludge Treatment. In the FAST io-Microbics, Inc. warrants every new Residential FAST® system against wastewater treatment system process, a colony of bacteria, called the defects in materials and workmanship for a period of two years after installs biomass, breaks down biodegradable waste into carbon dioxide and ion subject to the following terms and conditions, (Commercial FAST system water. The process occurs continuously as long as the biomass is supplied for a period of one year after installation or eighteen months from date of ship- food (incoming waste) and oxygen (air) in a suitable environment. Solid ment,whichever occurs first,subject to the following terms and conditions): material that the biomass cannot process settles into the septic tank for normal removal by pump-out. During the warranty period, if any part is defective or fails to perform as speci fied when operating at design conditions, and if the equipment has been in The heart of the FAST wastewater treatment system is a honeycomb-type stalled and is being operated and maintained in accordance with the written media suspended in the septic tank below ground. The media contains the instructions provided by Bio-Microbics,Inc.,Bio-Microbics,Inc.will repair o � eplace at its discretion such defective parts free of charge. Defective parts biomass. Above ground, an electric blower blows air through an must be returned by owner to Bio-Microbics, Inc.'s factory postage paid, if so underground pipe into the media to aerate the wastewater. Aeration requested. The cost of labor and all other expenses resulting from replacement circulates the wastewater, thereby providing both food and oxygen to the of the defective parts and from installation of parts furnished under this war- biomass. An outlet pipe directs treated wastewater into the septic tank ranty and regular maintenance items such as filters or bulbs shall be borne b drain field. he owner. This warranty does not cover general system misuse, aerator con onents which have been damaged by flooding or any components that have There are no moving mechanical parts in the FAST wastewater treatment been disassembled by unauthorized persons, improperly installed or damage system other than the blower (however there may be other moving parts due to altered or improper wiring or overload protection. This warranty applies associated with other portions of your treatment system). With proper use only to the treatment plant and does not include any of the house wiring, plumbing, drainage, septic tank or disposal system. Bio-Microbics, Inc. is re- and maintenance, and a healthy environment for the biomass, the FAST serves the right to revise, change or modify the construction and/or design o wastewater treatment system will perform safely and reliably. the FAST system,or any component part or parts thereof,without incurring any obligation to make such changes or modifications in present equipment. Bio icrobics, Inc. is not responsible for consequential or incidental damages o Typical FAST®System Installation any nature resulting from such things as, but not limited to, defect in design, material,or workmanship,or delays in delivery,replacements or repairs. HIS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES EX- FAST®Control Panel PRESS OR IMPLIED. BIO-MICROBICS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS Observation NY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS Blower Housing Port FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. FAST®Wastewater ftdz"Air Supply Treatment System NO REPRESENTATIVE OR PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY OTHER WARRANTY OR TO ASSUME FOR BIO-MICROBICS, INC., Power Cable NY OTHER LIABILITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF ITS PRODUCTS. Contact your local distributor for parts and service. Sewer Line SepticTank Septic Tank Drain Field System Diagram 6 19 i • INTERMITTENT USE SYSTEM COMPONENTS The FAST wastewater treatment system will function normally even if wastewater does not enter the system for an extended period of time.The A.Underground Treatment System power to the system should be left on during short periods when there is The underground treatment tank includes the septic tank (supplied by no wastewater flow to the system. Suggestions for intermittent use others) and the FAST wastewater treatment module. Underground pipes (Check with local regulations before attempting): If the property is carry wastewater into and away from the tank. Depending upon local going to used seasonally and shut down completely for an extended codes, a pipe or cover may extend upward from the tank. This pipe may period of time (i.e. summer use only and then abandoned for the winter), serve as a pump-out pipe to remove solid material from the septic tank. we suggest that the blower be shut down. The blower should be re- An observation port may extend from the top of the module. This can started upon return to the property. Your local service provider may be serve as a vent for the module and also used for service. contacted to perform these functions (It is also possible to arrange for the re-starting of the blower a week or two in advance of return through your WARNING• Only authorized service personnel are to local service provider.). If the property will be used on weekends only, it remove caps on pipes or covers on the septic tank. Removal is best to leave the blower on continuously throughout the season for use by unauthorized personnel may result in death or bodily until an extended period of absence is anticipated. (Extended period injury from potentially hazardous gases and waste matter. being at least 4 weeks or more.) A slight odor may be detected for a couple of days while the system returns to normal operation. WARNING: The treatment unit can be damaged by placing heavy items on the ground above the tank. Vehicles heavier ABANDONMENT OR DECOMMISSIONING than a lawn tractor should not be driven in the area If you plan to connect your house's sewer system to a municipal sewer surrounding the FAST system to minimize the risk of damage system, or if your FAST wastewater treatment system is no longer to the septic tank and associated piping (unless the septic tank has been needed, please contact your Bio-Microbics service technician or Bio- specially designed for use under roadways). Microbics, Inc. (913-422-0707). Procedures specified by regulatory agencies must be followed when the FAST wastewater treatment system B.Control Panel is abandoned or decommissioned. A light on the control panel reports the status of the system's electrical circuit. If the red light is lit or flashing,there is a problem in the system. SPECIFICATIONS A buzzer also sounds when the red light flashes. Power Requirements 120 or 220 VAC, 1 Phase, 60Hz., 50Hz. a 8•YVC D� 0 IMPORTANT PHONE NUMBERS o Space is provided for you on the title page to record important phone P� rl_ numbers. a rID Yam'•�4 Wu 1 N C 0 N P 0 N A T E 0 1-800-753-FAST (3278) FIGURE 1 CONTROL PANEL 18 7 If the alarm should sound, check air intake and vents for obvious signs of attempt to restore electrical power to the blower. The service blockage,but do not attempt to remove caps or open the blower housing. technician must inspect and evaluate the condition of the FAST unit before electrical power is restored. If there are no signs of blockage, check the circuit breaker switch located in the FAST system control panel. If the switch has tripped, reset the Water covering the septic tank unit can be tolerated if there is no leakage switch. If the alarm stays on, call your authorized Bio-Microbics service or backup into the system. Backup is characterized by wastewater technician. The horn may be silenced by pushing the silence button on flowing back into the house or slow movement of wastewater in the the control panel. drains. C.Identification Plate WARNING: Anyone coming in contact with wastewater must An identification plate similar to the one shown in figure 1 is located on remove any contaminated clothing and thoroughly wash all the control panel and on the blower housing. Information that identifies exposed body areas with soap and water. Then consult a the unit is found on the plate. For future reference, copy the information physician to minimize the risk of illness. on the plate onto page 18. If you contact your authorized Bio-Microbics service technician or Bio-Microbics, Inc. Customer Service, the service EVALUATION OF SYSTEM PERFORMANCE technician may request information on the identification plate. The FAST wastewater treatment system operates automatically. There are no operating procedures for the user of the FAST wastewater treatment system to perform. However, as with any home appliance or j T machine, simple periodic checks should, and can be made to aid in the V prevention of costly repair problems. Generally, the FAST wastewater FAST® treatment system unit can be checked by sight and by smell. Bio-Microbics,Inc. 8450 Cole Parkway Odor Evaluation Shawnee, KS 66227 The FAST wastewater treatment system produces only a "musty" odor. 913-422-0707 There should be no septic smell (sulfur or rotten eggs) emanating from your system. Should there be a sulfurous "septic" smell associated with MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. the FAST system,contact your Bio-Microbics service technician. RATED : GAL.PER DAY,UP TO PERSONS Visual Evaluation CLASSIFICATION: NSF INT'L, STD 40,CLASS 1 FOR SERVICE CALL: ALARM The FAST systen should produce effluent that is virtually as clear as tap SILENCE water,however it is NOT fit for consumption. If the system is producing wastewater that is not clear contact the local Bio-Microbics service I technician. DANGER: DO NOT attempt to service any components of the FIGURE 2 IDENTIFICATION PLATE A FAST unit yourself- call your Bio-Microbics service technician. Potentially hazardous gases and waste matter are D.Blower Housing contained in the treatment tank and only trained, certified The blower housing sits above ground and contains the blower and an service technicians are authorized to service your unit. Servicing by electric conduit. Air is drawn into the housing,then directed through an unauthorized personnel may result in death or bodily injury. underground pipe to the aeration system in the treatment tank. 8 17 ALARM WARNING WARNING: Do NOT allow children to play on or around The s stem is equipped with a red light on the control panel and an alarm A the blower housing. Such play may result in falls or other y accidents causing serious bodily injury. horn. Should the red light illuminate or flash and the horn activate, check g Y I rY. the breaker on the control panel to ensure it is not off. If the breaker is turned off, attempt to reset it. If the breaker fails to remain reset, call CAUTION: Ice may form around vents during cold your Bio-Microbics service technician. The alarm horn may be shut off weather. Use caution when walking in these areas to avoid by pushing the silence button. Pushing the silence button will not falling, causing serious bodily injury. reactivate the unit,only silence the horn. NOTICE: Do not cover the blower housing or vents. When mowing, BLOWER STOPPAGE OR POWER OUTAGE direct debris from the mower away from the blower. The area around The FAST wastewater treatment system requires a supply of oxygen and the blower housing and vents must be clear so air can enter the food for the .biomass. Should the blower stop, air flow through the housing and vents. Do NOT allow debris or other objects, including aeration pipe will stop, cutting off the supply of oxygen to the biomass. drifting snow or ice, to cover over housing and vents. A prolonged absence of oxygen will seriously affect the condition of the E. NSF STANDARD 40,CLASS 1,CERTIFICATION MARK biomass. When the blower is operating, it will emit a humming sound. The NSF mark shown below is displayed on all NSF Standard 40, If the blower is not operating, first determine whether an electrical power Class 1 certified FAST wastewater treatment systems. The outage has occurred in your community. MicroFAST 0.5, 0.75, 0.9, and 1.5 system should all have this mark on the side of the control panel housing. Non NSF certified systems will If your house is without electricity, call the electric utility. If the not have this mark. electricity is off more than 48 hours, call your Bio-Microbics service technician as well for treatment system advice. If your house has electricity, but the blower is not operating, follow the procedure under ALARM WARNING. FLOODING Flood water may cover the septic tank unit, the blower housing, or both, FIGURE 3 NSF CERTIFICATION MARK if the FAST system is installed in a low-lying area. DANGER: Electrical equipment located in flooded areas INTRODUCING SUBSTANCES INTO THE SYSTEM Apresents an electrical hazard. Should the unit become flooded, Introducing harmful substances into the system may reduce the call your Bio-Microbics service technician. Stay out of a efficiency of the system or stop the treatment process by destroying the flooded area. Failure to do so may result in electrical shock biomass. These substances that reduce the efficiency or stop the causing death or serious bodily injury. treatment process can be grouped into two groups, prohibited substances and limited-use substances. While the FAST wastewater SHOULD water cover all, or part, of the blower housing, treatment system will process most waste produced by the average IMMEDIATELY disconnect electrical power to the blower at your household, the following information will maximize the system's house circuit breaker box by switching the circuit breaker to "off'. efficiency and reduce the time period between septic tank pump-outs. Immediately call your Bio-Microbics service technician. Do not In general, if a substance is harmful to humans, or is anti-biotic in 16 9 nature, it should not be put into any septic system including FAST. If SERVICE AFTER THE FIRST TWO YEARS you have a question regarding the effect of a particular substance on the An Extended Service Policy is available and may be purchased through FAST system,call your Bio-Microbics service technician. your local Bio-Microbics distributor. The extended service policy should provide the same service checks as the initial NSF service policy, sludge NOTICE: Introducing harmful or damaging chemicals into your accumulation levels in the septic and FAST tanks, and perform any FAST system may void the warranty. additional service required by local regulation. Extended service on NSF certified systems should be performed twice per year. A.Prohibited Substances Prohibited substances are those substances which, when present in even THE SEPTIC TANK small amounts,will prevent the FAST system from providing wastewater Periodically, waste will need to be removed from the settling compart- treatment. Substances that will not dissolve may clog and possibly ment of the septic tank using normal pump-out procedures.Bio- damage the aeration unit. The following is a partial list of prohibited Microbics recommends that pump-out occur if sludge is 18 inches deep, substances, common sense should be used for other substances not on or takes up 75%of the volume of the settling compartment below the this list: port connecting settling chamber to FAST chamber.All stricter,applica- ble regulations supercede these operational directions. When pump out of 1. Plastic or rubber products the settling compartment occurs,the FAST compartment should also 2. Petroleum based products, such as motor oil, paint, paint thinner, have any sludge removed. Only persons experienced in wastewater gasoline, and solvents treatment or service are authorized to remove the septic tank cover. If 3. Non-biodegradable products, such as sanitary napkins, wipes, the drains in your house require an unusual amount of time to drain,the condoms, diapers and cat litter septic tank may require pumping out. 4. Toxic substances such as pesticides, strong disinfectants large amounts of strong caustic drain cleaners, paint or anything else that WARNING• Do NOT attempt to service components of the would be toxic to humans. This includes quaternary ammonia FAST wastewater treatment system yourse f call your Bio- compounds(found in some commercial cleaners). Microbics service technician. Only authorized service 5. Large amounts of paper products, such as paper towels and synthetic personnel are to remove caps on pipes or covers on the septic fiber-reinforced products advertised as having "wet strength," tank. Removal by unauthorized personnel may result in death or bodily 6. Animal fats, such as bacon grease or lard (normal cleaning of pots injury from potentially hazardous gases and waste matter. and pans is acceptable). 7. Liquid fabric softeners WARNING: The treatment unit can be damaged by placing 8. Water softener waste(from regeneration)without flow equalization heavy items on the ground above the tank. Vehicles heavier than a lawn tractor should not be driven in the area Chemicals surrounding the FAST system to minimize the risk of damage The following chemicals are prohibited substances and should not be to the septic tank and associated piping (unless the septic tank has been poured into the FAST system tank or leach field: specially designed for use under roadways). 1. Herbicides NOTICE• The area around the blower housing and vents must be 2. Pesticides clear so air can enter the housing. Do NOT allow debris or other 3. Paint thinner objects, including drifting snow or ice, to cover the blower housing or 4. Motor oil(including transmission oil and hydraulic fluid) vents.. When mowing, direct debris from the mower away from the blower housing and vents. NOTICE: Contact your Bio-Microbics, Inc. service technician immediately if a substantial spill occurs in the area of the treatment system. 10 15 �I v e B.Limited-use Substances A. Complete this section ONLY if the FAST®was installed in tank at the jobsite. Limited-use substances in large concentration will reduce or stop the Concrete Tank Trash Tank Clean Out Present treatment process. These same substances in smaller concentrations will Fiberglass Tank FAST Chamber Clean Out Present have no harmful effect on the treatment process (in general, a small Anti-Flotation Installed Trash Tank Vent concentration is defined as being a dosage amount that the substance's H20 Loading Capabilities Inspection Port Access to Grade Fill Over FAST Lid manufacturer recommendeds). You may use the followingsubstances Tank Level without harming your FAST system if you use the substance according Watertight Joints&Piping to the manufacturer's directions, use the substances sparingly, and do not introduce concentrated doses into the system. B. Tankage Yes No Service&Access Port Yes No 1. Laundry bleach Tank Manufacturer Tank Model No. 2. Detergents with bleach Working Liquid Volume in Trash Collector Chamber 3. Household cleaners containing sodium bactericides such as: Working Liquid Volume in FAST Treatment Chamber Pine oil(disinfectant used in general purpose liquid cleaners), FAST system installed using which method Lid Suspension Leg Support N-alkyl dichlorobenzyl ammonium chloride (disinfectant used in FAST system installed into tank by whom: detergents and spray cleaners), Sodium hydroxide (lye-chemical used in drain openers and C. Alarm Panel/Piping cleaners), Sodium dichlor-s-triazinetrione (powdered bleach used in Visual Alarm Operating Length of Air Supply Line scouring powders and automatic dishwasher detergents), Audio Alarm Operating Diameter of Air Supply Line Sensor Switch Installed Ortho-phenylphenol (bactericide used in tub and toilet bowl cleaners). D. Air Blower Food Waste Filter Element Inside Inlet&Outlet Pipe Installed Correctly Some food waste, whether or not it is run through a garbage disposal, Blower Hood Installed Blower Operates Correctly will not be treated by the FAST system, but will remain in solid form and Blower Hood Secure Blower Area Subject to Flooding Blower Area Ventilated Blower Area Subject to Snow Load fall to the bottom of the septic tank. Large quantities of organic material Blower Hood Vents Clear introduced into the FAST system from the garbage grinder may Wired for High or Low Voltage Single Phase or Three Phase organically overload the FAST system and cause more frequent pump- Voltage 50 hz or 60 hz out of the septic tank. Therefore, you should consider not disposing of these food items: j E: Treatment Unit 1. Animal bones Air Lift Operates Correctly Remote or Inspection Port Vent Module Insert Stable Module Sealed&Bolted to Tank 2. Melon rinds 4"Outlet Pipe Place Air Line Connection Glued to Airlift 3. Corn cobs Length of Vent Line Size of Vent Line Pipe 4. Pits and seeds 5. Eggshells F. Other 6. Any other non-edible waste Manuals Onsite for Owner NSF Inspection Service Given to Owner C.Acceptable Substances Warranty to Owner After NSF Service Contract to Owner 'cal domestic wastewater are considered to be t Substances that are const typical 14 11 human waste, bath and dish water, edible food waste, and coffee and tea EXCESSIVE FOAMING grounds. Some foaming may occur during the startup of the system. This foaming is tan in color and is normal due to massive growth of the The following substances may be used regularly without harming your bacterial population in the treatment chamber. FAST wastewater treatment system: The production of pure white foam after the system has been running for 1. Laundry detergents without bleach atleast one week, indicates the excessive use of detergents, or use of 2. Dishwashing detergents without bleach detergents that have a large of amount of sudsing agents (Tide is known 3. Toilet paper to produce condition). 4. Household cleaners containing sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate and sodium borate. NSF CERTIFIED SYSTEMS SERVICE POLICY All NSF Standard 40, Class I certified wastewater treatment sytems NOTICE: Sodium borate is found in some household cleaners. It will not (MicroFAST 0.5, 0.75, 0.9, 1.5) have an intitial service agreement for harm the FAST wastewater treatment system, but its use may be restricted two years (two calls per year) included with the sytem's initial purchase by local wastewater codes. Check with the appropriate authority before price. To find out who is the NSF initial service provider for your using products containing sodium borate. system, check the labels on the blower housing or control panel. NOTICE: IMMEDIATELY fix all leaky fixtures. Even the smallest If there are any deficiencies in the FAST systems operation or leak will greatly increase the hydraulic load on the FAST unit and may components, the service person will notify the owner in writing and prevent it from fidly treating the waste. Excess flow may also cause detail when these deficiencies can be fixed. eventual failure of a drainfield system. If these service calls are not performed on your NSF certified system,or SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING not all of the items are checked, please call Bio-Microbics toll-free at The FAST wastewater treatment system operates automatically and 800-753-FAST(3278). continuously. The maintenance procedures for the user of the FAST wastewater treatment system include keeping the vents and the blower For the homeowner, operational procedures for the FAST wastewater treatment system are minimal. Normal operation of the unit requires housing clear of debris. The homeowner should monitor the status of the operation of the blower and regular discharge of wastewater to the unit. system (alarm indicator light as shown in Figure 2), substances introduced into the system, and the frequency of required pumpout as Leaves, snow, or other material must not be allowed to block the blower determined by the service provider. intake. If the blower should fail, follow the procedure given under ALARM WARNING. IF WASTEWATER BACKUP OCCURS, do not add water; turn off any taps or appliances, such as a clothes washer, that direct water into the During service calls,the authorized service person will check the blower wastewater system and contact service technicians immediately. for proper operation and perform preventative maintenance including cleaning of the blower intake and inspection of control panel light. The If the instructions contained in this manual are carefully followed, the service provider should also measure the solids level in the septic tank FAST wastewater treatment system can provide years of service. If and recommend pumpout when necessary. problems arise due to chemical spills, power outages or alarms, contact your Bio-Microbics service technician. This unit is to be serviced only by When performing an NSF service call, the service provider will run the trained and certified Bio-Microbics technicians. checks included on the checklist shown on the next page (a service provider's checklist may have a different appearance, but will contain each of these checks). 12 13 ..0 TRANS.NO.: CITY/TOWN: C G K T67k V l 1.1-L' APPLICANT: _ a0 y G E 4 P CO'r001 ADDRESS: 2R_ �- �L=�}Gl►I IZOY40 DESIGN FLOW: gpd REVIEWED BY: M t Lu n I L P. Pe--WeA u t.T. DATE: 7-31-0 q N/A OK NO GENERAL . Legal boundaries denoted 310 CMR 15.220(4)(a)] ✓' Street,Lot,tax parcel number and lot number noted on plan [310 CMR 15.220(4)(u)] Locus Provided 310 CMR 15.2204(t)] e� Plan proper scale?(1"=40'for plot,plans, 1"=20'or fewer for components) 310 CMR 15.220(4)] Easements shown 310 CMR 15.220(4)(b)] System located totally on lot served [310 CMR 15.405(1)(a)for upgrades]-i not, a variance is required 310 CMR 15.412(4)] Location of impervious surfaces(driveways,parking areas etc.) ✓, [310 CMR 15.220(4)(d)] Location all buildings existing and proposed 310 CMR 15.220(4)(c)] Location and dimensions of system components and reserve areas. 310 CMR 15.220(4)(e)] System Calculations 310 CMR 15.220(4)(1)] daily flow se tic tank capacity(required andprovided) soil absorption system(required andprovided) 1d whether system designed for garbage grindei e/ North arrow 310 CMR 15.220 4 Existing and ro osed contours 310 CMR 15.220 4 Location and log of deep observation holes(existing grade el. on each test) [310 CMR 15.220(4)(h Names of soil evaluator and BOH representative [310 CMR 15.220 4 h and i Location and date of percolation tests(performed at proper 00 elevation?) [310 CMR 15.220(4)(i)] Percolation test results match loading rate? 310 CMR 15.242 Certification statement by Soil Evaluator 310 CMR 15.220(4)0)] ✓' Observed and Adjusted groundwater(method for adjustment given or indicated) [310 CMR 15.103(3)and 310 CMR 15.220(4)(n)] Address__ 243 �oN&, Bra Rn CElyzts? via Sheet 1 of 1 t f _ J r. f II /i 1 i N/A OK NO Location of every water supply,public and private, [310 CMR 15.220 4 within 400 feet of the proposed system location in the case of surface water supplies and gravel packed public water sup 1 within 250 feet of the proposed system location in the case ✓' within 150 feet of the proposed system location in the case of private water supply wells Location of all surface waters and wetlands located up to 100 ft. beyond setbacks listed in 310 CMR 15.211 and any catch basins located within 50 ft. 310 CMR 15.220(4)(1)] Water lines and other subsurface utilities located [310 CMR 15.220(4)(m)] (if water line cross see 310 CMR 15.211(1)[1 Profile of system showing invert elevations of all system components and the bottom of the SAS 310 CMR15.220(4)(9)] Stamp of designer 310 CMR 15.220 1 and 310 CMR 15.220(2)] Stamp of Registered Land Surveyor(required if construction activities within 5 ft.of lot line) [310 CMR 15.220(3)] Test Holes adequate(two in each of the primary and reserve unless trenches as permitted in 310 CMR 15.102(2)or as approved for an upgrade under LUA at 310 CMR 15.405(1) Test hole adequate to demonstrate four feet of suitable material? . 310 CMR 15.103 4 Test Holes adequate to confirm adequate groundwater separation? 1/ 310 CMR 15.103(3)] Benchmark within 50-75'of system 310 CMR 15.220(4)(g)] ✓' Materials specifications noted? [various sections of 310 CMR 15.000 System components not>36" deep(unless Local Upgrade Approval or LUA requested) 310 CMR 15.405(1 Address 2 Q3 Loamy Lam/ a, l.almoue- Sheet 2 of 7 . ( I ' ' r�7IF.s ICf1` a !r• "• I ,. � .: ��_ � t �ra3 �_.__....�. _�..... _.....i.. _...__ ._._ — S! � - 3 ,'t'J'rPjtl-.- �r !al ajM: .__7 h(�.. t,—. •�';+ f c,a .fE.tt,t!(. �� • � :1. ! 3 t_1'{', � 1' `,� ,llt - - ,tJr ''}, r r 3•i ! 'l:il,!, ijrt.3 ., a 2 t j N/A OK NO SEPTIC TANK' Size OK? 310 CMR 15.223 1 L11001 Inlet tee located ten inches below flow line 310 CMR 15.227(6)] ✓' Outlet tee 14" or 14"+5"per foot for increase ft depth [310 CNM 15.227(6)] POT Outlet tee with gas baffle or approved filter 310 CMR 15.227(4)] Note regarding installation on stable compacted base [310 CMR 15.228 1 OeTAIL Separation between inlet and outlet tees(no less than liquid depth) 310 CMR 15.227(2)) Inlet/Outlet elevations at least 12"above high groundwater (except as described 310 CMR 15.227(5))or permitted for upgrades under LUA 310 CMR 15.405 1 k Minimum cover 9" (Tanks buried more than 9"must have risers on all openings and on the d-box) [310 CMR 15.2228(1)and 310 VOO CMR 15.232(3)(0] Three access covers(inlet and outlet must be 20"or greater)- I� middle access at least 8" 7/07 310 CMR 15.228(2)] P1j*T Access to within 6 " of grade -one port for systems<1000gpd, e/ two fors stems>1000 g d [310 CMR 15.228(2)] P T All at-grade covers secured to unauthorized access? [310 CMR 15.228(2)] SPFcft > 10 fl from building foundation 310 CMR 15.211 1 ✓' Buoyancy calculation Required/Done 310 CMR 15.221(8)] H-20 Where appropriate? [310 CMR 15.226(3)] Setbacks from resources 310 CMR 15.211 I� 1VIu1ti=Com artment Tanks. ' �` � ��Y •�;F/q�5? ,�D�v./(��, i�EQ.�r?ZS..• Required when other than single-family dwelling or flow>1000 d 310 CMR 15.223 1 First compartment 200%daily flow; Second compartment 100% Vol' daily flow 310 CMR 15.224(2)and 3 "U"pipe through or over baffle,outlet of each compartment with as baffle or approved filter 310 CMR 15.224(4)] Address 243 L04&. BaW u K(. CLWZMU.'"LF Sheet 3 of 7 1 1 ' F 3 � t N/A OK NO BUILDING SEWER AND'OTHER PTPING Located at least ten feet from any water line? [310 CMR 15.222(2)] Disposal piping at least 18"below water line(when water and Vol sewer cross, see 310 CMR 15.211 1 1 Cleanouts required/provided? 310 CMR 15.222(8)] a� Thrust blocks specified in force mains?310 CMR 15.221(6)(c)] Slope of sewer line not less than 0.01 (1/8"/ft) 0.02 preferable 310 CMR 15.222(6)] 6� Proper pitch on all runs?(.005 within gravity-distributed trenches and beds) [310 CMR 15.251(9)and 310 CMR 15.252(2)(c)] I/ Siphonproblem/ leachfield below pump chamber Endca s or vent manifoldspecified? Size and orientation of discharge holes specified?(not smaller than 3/8"not larger than 5/8") [310 CMR 15.251(8)and 310 CMR 15.252(2)(h)] Materials specified (310 CMR 15.251(5)specifies various pipe types allowed DISTRIBUTION BOXY Stable compacted base [310 CMR 15.221(2)and 310 CMR 15.232(2)(a)] Splash plate or baffle tee required on inlet/provided?(when pressure sewer to d-box or steep pitch of gravity sewer) [310 CMR 15.323(3)(a)] Riser if deeper than 9" 310 CMR 15.232(3)(t)] Inside minimum dimension 12" 310 CMR 15.232(2)(b)] .� Minimum sum 6" 310 CMR15.232 3 e Watertight cover if<2000gpd);waterproof manhole if>2000gpd 310 CMR 15.232(3)(d)] PUMP CHAMBERS ;,.: . Capacity(emergency storage above working--design flow)? [310 CMR 231 2 Proper setbacks 310 CMR 15.211 same as septic tanks Watertight 20-in minium access manhole at least 20"MUST BE TO GRADE 310 CMR 15.231(5)] Service components accessible(not too deep with piping, disconnects accessible Alarm floats-alarm on circuit separate from pumps specified? Exceeds two units must have two pumps operating in lead-lag Vol'. mode. 310 CMR 15.231(6)and 8 Stable Compacted Base 1310 CMR 15.221(2)] IBuoyancy calculations needed?Provided? 310 CMR 15.221(8) Address 2Q3 l om, Piac} bl RP, CeN rewo/ GE" Sheet 4 of 7 — 9- -- - -i- - -- - -- -- - - - 6 ` � 't-.,;` •—rt'�• 'f ., tf.i� +rP•s .. �1,1:; s � , .� -.. .. #-__' -_. � _� -. �l - _ - - - - _ � _....�.....,_.f('•J'f rI� Ji s_....-'._ii i{•' if?_..-'..P,� r- ' ,r ! :...� ' t ' '4j^•' h •f .� t.'�.jt?i•. . .f!' ►,if1 s... I JI't i'$1'.!r�. t N/A OK NO SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEMS(SAS)GENERAL Calculations correct? 4 feet of naturally occurring material demonstrated? [310 CMR 15.240 1 Required separation togroundwater? 310 CMR 15.212 9S Aggregate specified as double washed 310 CMR 15.247(2)] No ;re 5,Y57eM System Venting required/provided?(system under driveway or >36" deep) 310 CMR 15.241 Inspection ports specified and within 3"final grade? [310 CMR 15.240 13 Breakout requirements met?(No violation of breakout elevation within 15 ft of SAS unless barrier) [310 CMR 15.211(1)[4] and 91 Guidance Document GALLERIES,PITS,CHAMBERS*31WCMR Y5 253 ` Chambers and Gal. in trench configuration supplied with inlet every 20 ft. 310 CMR 15.253(6)] Each structure with one inspection manhole(if>2000 gpd must be tograde) 310 CMR 15.253(2)] Aggregate I'minimum-4'maximum. 310 CMR 15.253 1 1/ 2' sidewall credit maximum 310 CMR 15.253 1 a a� In bed configuration, inlet every 40 s . ft. 310 CMR 15.253(6)] 1/ TRENCHES 31O CMR".t"5:251. Width 2'minimum 3'maximum 310 CMR 15.251 1 ✓' 100 feet-maximum length 310 CMR 15.251 1 a a/ Minimum separation 2x effective depth or width whichever eater 3x if reserve between trenches 310 CMR 251 1 d Situated along contours 310 CMR 15.251(2)] i/ Breakout OK? 310 CMR 15.211(l)[41 and Guidance Document BED SAS aximum size of bed or field 5000; d minimum 2 distribution lines 310 CMR 15.252(2)(a)] Maximum separation between lines 6' 310 CM R15.252(2)(d)] Maximum separation between lines and outside of bed 4' [310 CMR 15.252(2)(e)] Aggregate depth below discharge pipes 6"minimum, 12" maximum. 310 CMR 15.252 2 Separation between beds 10'minimum. 310 CMR 15.252(2)(0] Bottom area used in calculations only 310 CMR 15.252(2) i a/ µp pc-6,+ C WAM Wk iK Ft FtD coNF16. Address ?,q3 tolV& gem QD,, Catxu/ccc Sheet 5 of 7 it i ' _ _ � - w_.^ •• .1.-.. t• ..J I ' ,%-; J...girl ' .. 1 . 1 ` I 1 1 r , a t it a jf r: If t i •.. , `t. ,•rt , _ ��._. -_ t _. .�_. Jam__. r� __ � _ f'�:i �• .—.-. _ .» .,— ..._.� ..... _ ._.._ N/A OK NO DID THE•PLAN INVOLVE . k Pressure Dosed System ? Provided pump and piping calculations as required 310 CMR 15.220(4)(r)] Pressure dosing required on all systems>2000gpd or alternative systems under remedial approval [310 CMR 15.254(2)and I/A Remedial Use Approvals] If used in gravelless system-make sure jet is directed as not to Vol. scour soil interface Guidance Document Inspections once per year(systems<2000 gpd)or quarterly >2000 dgood to note on plan 310 CMR 15.254(2)(d)] Construction in fill -Did the plan specify that the fill shall meet Q the specification of 310 CMR 15.255 3 ? Impervious barrier and/or retaining wall? Guidance Document Impervious barrier installation must be supervised by designer 310 CMR 15.255 2 Retaining wall must be designed by Registered Professional Engineer 310 CMR 15.255 2 a) Side slope not exceed 3:1 ? 310 CMR 15.255(2)] Breakout requirements met? [310 CMR 15.252(2)and Guidance Document At least 5 ft. from impervious barrier to edge of SAS (10 ft. recommended) [310 CMR 15.255 2 e Grayelless'System[I/A:A Y'royal Letters] Check DEP Approval letters for credits and design conditions If used with pressure dosing do not allow pressure discharge to scour soil interface Alteriaatiue Septic System[UAA royal Letters 4 6,14 Was DEP Approval Letter provided and/or have you reviewed the letter for conditions? Is the technology being properly applied and does it meet all DEP Approval Conditions? Is there a note on the plan regarding the requirement for perpetual maintenance agreement? SH7 Z �q Any alarms involved on separate circuits ✓' �► Did the applicant submit an operation and maintenance V' 5 vav k-c manual? u: nn�aN v d VA A Has applicant submitted a copy of a maintenance cO Variances Are the variances listed on the plan? [310 CMR 15.220 4 i/ RLS Stamp necessary on plan if a component is within five feet of property line 310 CMR 15.412(4)] New construction or increased flow proposed- [Refer to 310 CMR 15.414 Address 213 L.o,cj&- Bey-XU at), CeWZ Vv1t&- Sheet 6 of 7 —_ __ _{ ._�.__ �tt _ _._ _' .(f �E,, !II• .r/E •1 .}! ._•'1 .. �r . y,(� —.�:5 <,1 Cis , ..o'er .- •..... � � _ .••� - ._1� .�.. _ � ,j � _-- 1 is ... w _'ram -- '�' ��..�.X_--.`- .,+� 4t + 1 N/A OK NO Nifrogen Sensitive Areas ' Is the system in a Designated Nitrogen Sensitive Area(Zone II for a public supply well)?[310 CMR 15.214, 310 CMR 15.215 and 310 CMR 15.216-also refer to Policy regarding upgrades of such existing systems] Is the system proposed on the same lot as served by private well ? 310 CMR 15.214(2)] Are the nitrogen loads proposed in compliance? [310 CNM 15.216 1 Miscellaneous ;.�. e ,. .A�, A Pumping to septic tank? 310 CMR 15.229 Shared System 310 CMR 15.290 Address 2n lom &,A 12J �eN-rzwvju G Sheet 7 of 7 _.. ._ _ � ,;�, _ . T - �� --..r.._,. �_ _-- - - - - _ _. __ r � .+ ` � � � .f .i �}' � I � 1 .� _.. ._ _._ '' _. __ _. _ ... < . .__ _. _ � _ ...._r _ l 5 �„, �` •\..`�.:Y.°��.� � A�. I� �•,t. k It _,> .�i. s. DRAFT Date: July 23, 2009 To: Barry Weiner,Esquire Eliza Cox,Esquire Ruberto, Israel& Weiner, P.C. Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP 100 North Washington Street P.O. Box 1630 Boston, Massachusetts 02114 Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 From: Cape Cod Commission RE: District of Critical Planning Concern (DCPQ Hardship Exemption Cape Cod Commission Act, Section 23 Applicant/ ` Owner: Joyce Haseotes,293 Long Beach Road, Centerville, Massachusetts Project: Haseotes Addition Project#: HDEX# 08023 Book/Page: LCPs 14594A& 16179A Plan Reference: Certificate No. 58363 DECISION OF THE CAPE COD COMMISSION SUMMARY The Cape Cod Commission (the "Commission") hereby approves with conditions the Hardship Exemption application of Joyce Haseotes (the"Applicant") for an addition to the single-family residence at 293 Long Beach Road in Centerville,MA pursuant to Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act (the "Act"), c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended. The decision is rendered pursuant to a vote of the Commission on July 23, 2009. DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 1 of 27 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The property consists of a 0.66-acre lot at 293 Long Beach Road in Centerville identified by the Town of Barnstable as Assessor's Map 185 Parcel 34 (the "site"). The site is abutted by barrier beach and Nantucket Sound to the south, residences to the east and west, and by Long Beach Road to the north. A single-family residence that was constructed circa 1929 occupies the site. At the time of their initial Hardship Exemption application submission, Byron and Joyce Haseotes were originally proposing to construct a 4,276-square foot(s.f.)two-floor addition to their approximately 5,150-s.f. residence. After the passing of her husband, Byron Haseotes, Joyce Haseotes revised the proposed plans to include a 1,937-s.f. one-floor addition to the residence. The Applicant is seeking an exemption to the limited moratorium on building permits, which was established by the creation of the Craigville Beach District of Critical Planning Concern (DCPC). PROCEDURAL HISTORY On October 15, 2008, Attorney Eliza Cox of Nutter, McClennen& Fish, LLP on behalf of Byron and Joyce Haseotes submitted an application to the Commission requesting a Hardship Exemption pursuant to Section 23 of the Act for the construction of a 4,276 s.f. (2,904 s.f. of livable space) addition to their single-family residence at 293 Long Beach Road in Centerville, MA. On December 18, 2008,the application was deemed complete, and a duly noticed public hearing was held to consider this request on January 13, 2009. After this public hearing and upon receiving feedback from the subcommittee that a revised plan could be more in line with the purposes of the DCPC, the Applicant's team met with Commission staff on several occasions to discuss proposed revisions to the plans. On April 15, 2009, the Commission received revised plans and materials for a proposed addition consisting of 2,853 s.f. on two floors. These plans eliminated unfinished attic space and a closet on the second floor, and a full kitchen, separate entryway/foyer, and a bathroom on the first floor. Additionally, the proposed septic system leachfield location was moved to an area outside of the _*("-- Centerville River watershed. In response to Commission staff comments regarding the revised plans,the Applicant again revised the addition plans to reduce the bulk and mass of the structure and submitted the revised civil and architectural plans to the Commission between June 3-8, 2009. The revised plans eliminated the second floor of the addition, consisting of the removal of a bedroom, den/office, medical supply/utility closet, and bathroom, removed the exterior deck proposed along the southern side of the additionon the barrier beach,removed the exterior dormers from the addition, and slightly reduced the height of the addition. The total square footage of the new addition proposed was 1,937 s.f. A duly noticed public hearing to consider the revised request was held on June 10, 2009. Subcommittee meetings were held on June 15, 2009, June 25, 2009, and July 14, 2009. DRAFT Decision-7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 2 of 27 On June 15, 2009, the subcommittee deliberated on the project. Based upon the Applicant's assertion that her hardship was a physical one that required the addition to be built,the chair of the subcommittee requested that the Applicant obtain a letter from Mrs. Haseotes' physician commenting on her physical disabilities. Upon receipt of this letter and after further deliberations on the project, at the June 25, 2009 meeting, the subcommittee voted(2 in favor and 1 opposed) to approve the Hardship Exemption application with conditions and directed staff to draft a decision for their review. On July 14, 2009,the subcommittee reviewed the draft decision and voted(2 in favor and 1 opposed) to forward the draft decision, approving the hardship exemption application with conditions,to the full Commission. A final public hearing was held before the full Commission on July 23, 2009, during which the Commission voted_in favor and_opposed to approve the Hardship Exemption application. MATERIALS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD In addition to the list of materials submitted for the record as listed below in Table 1, the application and notices of public hearings relative thereto, correspondence, the minutes of public meetings and hearings, and all other writings contained in the DRI file are hereby incorporated into the record by reference. 5; TABLE 1: Materials Submitted='for the Record Materials From the Applicant Date Submitted ' Hardship application materials submitted by E. Cox to Commission 10/15/08 staff Memorandum with attached Hardship exemption application materials 10/15/08 submi ed by F. Cox to K. Senatori Letter from E. Cox to Brona Simon(Massachusetts Historical Society) 10/17/08 re: roject notification form Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: Tuesday meeting date 10/29/08 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting dates 10/30/08 Email ftom E..Cox to K. Senatori, J. Buntich re: meeting date 10/31/08 Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached stamped MHC 11/10/08 form Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: project update 11/21/08 Letter providing additional information from E..Cox to K. Senatori 12/5/08 with attached printed emails from R. Gatewood(Conservation Administrator, Barnstable) re: resource areas Memorandum and attached civil site plans from E. Cox to K. Senatori 12/17/08 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: public hearing date 12/19/08 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: email confirmation 12/28/0.8 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: copies 1/6/09 DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 3 of 27 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: copies 1/6/09 Memo with attached supplemental information for Subcommittee from 1/7/09 E. Cox to K. Senatori Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: site visit 1/8/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: site visit confirmation 1/12/09 Print out of Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act from E. Cox 1/13/09 to staff and subcommittee Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: conference call 1/26/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: draft minutes, availability 2/6/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting time, minutes 2/9/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting minutes 2/9/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting time 2/11/09 Revised elevation& floor plan submitted by hand from E. Tolley to K. 2/12/09 Senatori Minutes from public hearing on 1-13-09 with revisions by E. Cox to K. 2/12/09 Senatori Email from C. McGrath to K. Senatori re: scheduling 3/5/09 Email from C. McGrath to K. Senatori re: scheduling 3/6/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: thanks 3/9/09 Updated plans, nitrogen loading calculations, `revised' minutes 3/12/09 Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached updated plans 4/15/09 and calculations Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: response to S. Michaud's 4/24/09 comments Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting time change 4/29/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting time confirmation 4/29/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: possible scheduling conflict 5/13/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: thanks 5/13/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting date change 5/15/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting scheduling 5/20/09 mai rom E. Cox to K. Senatori re: meeting time Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: response to January staff 5/20/09 report Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: deed restrictions, lowest point of 5/28/09 addition Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attendance confirmation 5/27/09 Revised septic, sketch, and site plans submitted by hand 5/28/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached deed restrictions & town 5/29/09 comments Email from B. Weiner to J. Wielgus re: plan& staff report revisions 6/1/09 Email from E. Tolley to K. Senatori, E. Cox re: confirmation of lowest 6/3/09 point of addition Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: confirmation of deck removal 6/3/09 Fax from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: confirmation of deck removal 6/3/09 Memorandum from B. Weiner to K. Senatori re: attached Coastal 6/3/09 Resources consultant payment DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 4 of 27 Memo from E. Tolley to K. Senatori re: Attached and revised floor and 6/3/09 exterior elevation plans Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached updated civil site 6/3/09 plans, nitrogen loading calculations, updated lot coverage calculations, mailing materials Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: revised civil/septic plans 6/5/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached updated civil/septic plan 6/5/09 Memorandum from E. Tolley to K. Senatori re: Attached and revised 6/8/09 floor and exterior elevation plans Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached revised architectural 6/8/09 Tans Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: out of office 6/12/09 Memorandum from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: attached revised civil site 6/5/09 plan; full size Email from B. Weiner to K. Senatori re: attendance confirmation 6/15/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: recording information 6/24/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: total s.f. 6/24/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori with attached plan 6/29/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori re: copies 7/10/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori with attached draft deed restrictions 7/14/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori with revised draft deed restrictions 7/16/09 Email from E. Cox to K. Senatori with revised draft deed restrictions 7/21/09 Materials from Commission Staff Date Submitted Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: meeting with applicant 10/28/08 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: application completeness 10/28/08 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: project comments 12/7/08 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: public hearing 12/22/08 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: public hearing confirmation ',12/22/08 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: copies 1/6/09 Staff report 1/6/09 Email om K. Senatori to E. Cox re: public hearing 11/109 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: public hearing 1/7/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: site visit time/day 1/7/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: comments for staff report 1/7/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: site visit 1/9/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: attached comment letter 1/11/09 Fax from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: attached comment letter from 1/12/09 anonymous Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: site visit confirmation 1/12/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: nitrogen loading calculations 1/21/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting conflict 2/6/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: draft minutes, meeting dates 2/6/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: word doe, meeting date 2/9/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting confirmation 2/11/09 Email from K. Senatori to C. McGrath re: meeting date/time 3/6/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: S. Michaud's attached comments 4/23/09 DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 5 of 27 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: S. Michaud's attached 4/27/09 comments Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting 4/29/09. Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting time change 4/29/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: noticing delay 5/13/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: hearing confirmation 5/15/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting time 5/19/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: meeting/memorandum 5/20/09 Memorandum via facsimile from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: Coastal 5/21/09 Resources Consultant Fee Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: attached updated staff report 5/27/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: list of deed restrictions 5/28/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: lowest point of renovation 6/3/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: revised memo 16/3/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: revised memo for mailing 6/3/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox&B. Weiner re: updated staff report 6/3/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: revised civil plans 6/5/09 Email from K. Senatori to B. Weiner re: updated staff report 6/9/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: attached email in support 6/10/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: subcommittee meeting date 6/12/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: Haseotes past permits 6/12/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: subcommittee meeting 6/17/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: meeting date, attached letter 6/24/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: recording information,mtg dates 6/24/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: s.f.totals 6/24/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: s.f. clarification 6/24/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox requesting plan 6/26/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Miller Buntich re: subcommittee meeting 6/30/09 Email with decision from K. Senatori to E. Cox, B. Weiner, J. Buntich 7/7/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox requesting copies 7/10/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox with attached draft decision 7 1 09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: deed restrictions 7/16/09 Email from K. Senatori to E. Cox re: proposed language 7/23/09 Email from K. Senatori to J. Buntich re: proposed language 7/23/09 Materials from Town of Barnstable Date Received Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: meeting dates 10/28/08 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori, E. Cox re: meeting 10/30/08 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: meeting&town comments 12/5/08 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: meeting with staff 12/9/08 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: Tom McKean's (Director of 1/5/09 Public Health, Barnstable) attached comments Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: town comments 1/7/09 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori, S. Korjeff re: draft comments 5/19/09 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: meeting attendance 6/12/09 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: past permit discussions 6/14/09 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: attached ZBA files 6/15/09 DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 6 of 27 Email from J. Buntich to K. Senatori re: meeting attendance 6/24/09 Email from J. Buntich cc: K. Senatori re: accessory uses 7/16/09 Email from J. Buntich cc: K. Senatori re: revised drafts 7/22/09 Materials from Others Date Received Email from anonymous to K. Senatori re: opposition to project 1/5/09 Letter from J. Driscoll in support of the project 6/6/09 Letter from J. and B. Haseotes in support of the project 6/9/09 Email from A. Marty to K. Senatori in support of theproject 6/9/09 Email from J. Bieling to K. Senatori in support of the project 6/10/09 Letter from E. Weber, M.D. to K. Senatori re: Mrs. Haseotes' health 6/16/09 TESTIMONY Public hearing-January 13 2009 A public hearing was held at 6:00 pm on January 13, 2009 in Rooms 11&12 of the Barnstable Superior Courthouse. Attorney Eliza Cox of Nutter, McClennen&Fish,LLP, Mr. Erik Tolley of ERT Architects, and Mr. Mike Perrault of P.M.P Associates, Inc. presented the proposed addition plans on behalf of Byron and Joyce Haseotes. The Applicant's team indicated Mr. Haseotes currently lives in the house, but that is has become dangerous for him, as the hallways are very narrow and that the bathrooms aren't wheelchair accessible. The Applicant also noted that the addition has to be elevated and they are connecting to the existing house but they are not making any alterations to the existing house. The Applicant's team suggested that the amount of time and money and investment that the client made prior to the implementation of the DCPC, together with Mr. Haseotes' medical conditions and the fact that this existing home does not accommodate his needs, constitute a substantial hardship. Ms. Kristy Senatori, Ms. Sarah Korjeff, and Mr. Scott Michaud presented the staff report. Staff gave a brief overview of the existing site setting, the Cape Cod Commission's jurisdiction,an ervi ei.* -of the DCPC, staff analysis in tho appliGab le Fe—so i WrGe,i ssi ic aren s, and concil I S* Staff explained the purpose of the DCPC building permit moratorium and said that the regulations are anticipated in June of this year. Staff said that an applicant may apply for a Hardship Exemption for any development that can demonstrate that a suspension of action on a local development permit application during a period of moratorium constitutes a substantial hardship. Staff suggested that the project as proposed would substantially derogate from the intent and purpose of the DCPC and the Act in the area of water resources, coastal resources, and community character. Staff noted they had not received nitrogen-loading calculations and the Applicant's counsel responded that they would be provided. Subcommittee members asked questions of the Applicant's team and Commission staff regarding the existing house, specifics regarding the proposed FAST septic system and leachfield and their proposed locations, Mr. Haseotes' physical disabilities, and the use of the house by the Haseotes family. Subcommittee members voiced concerns about the purpose of the DCPC with regard to the bulk and scale of the houses, and asked additional questions regarding the scale of the proposed addition in relation to the neighboring community, and raised flooding concerns. DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 7 of 27 Ms. Jo Anne Miller Buntieh, Director of Growth Management for the Town of Barnstable, said that the Town is in agreement with the analysis provided by the staff. She applauded the de- nitrifying system that is proposed, but said that the Town has additional concerns about flows because this is an area identified by the town for sewering. She questioned the undesignated areas in the proposed addition and raised concerns about flooding. She said the Town concludes that the hardship exemption derogates from the DCPC. Subcommittee members suggested a continuation of the hearing based on the staffs need to review the nitrogen loading calculations, and they requested dramatically scaled-down plans. Public hearing—June 10, 2009 A public hearing was held at 6:00 pm on June 10, 2009 at the Cape Cod Commission office. Ms. Senatori presented the staff report. She noted that the project as originally proposed consisted of a three-bedroom addition of approximately 4,276 s.f. on two floors. An exterior deck along the southern side of the addition was also proposed and the septic system's leach field was sited within the Centerville River watershed. She noted the applicant made revisions to the plans and the new proposal now consists of a two-bedroom, 1,937 s.f. addition on one floor. She noted the elimination of the proposed deck and that the applicant moved the septic system leach field outside of the sensitive watershed. She noted that while the original deadline for the town to adopt its implementing regulations for the DCPC was June 12, 2009,the town requested and received a 90-day extension of this timeframe and the new deadline for adopting the implementing regulations is September 10, 2009. She stated that Commission standards allow for existing structures on barrier beach to be reconstructed or renovated provided there is no increase in floor area, footprint, or intensity of use. Ms. Senatori stated that since the applicant is proposing an increase in footprint, it is not possible for the applicant to meet this standard without a Hardship Exemption. Ms. Senatori also indicated that the applicant worked with the Town of Barnstable and has proposed to place deed restrictions on the property that would include: 1) a view corridor restriction that would prohibit structures within the 30' westerly side yard setback, requiring the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of vegetation; 2) that the house with the proposed addition presents the full build-out of the property; 3) a bedroom restriction limited the residence to a total of 6 bedrooms; and 4) a use restriction limiting the property use to single family residential only which includes no accessory apartments. Ms. Senatori also noted that earlier in the day staff received four letters from abutters to the project in support of the project, and the subcommittee now has those letters. Attorneys Barry Weiner of Ruberto,.Israel & Weiner and Eliza Cox of Nutter, McClennen and Fish, presented on behalf of the Applicant. Attorney Weiner respectfully noted that Byron Haseotes passed away on May 25, 2009. He also noted that the Haseotes' hardship is financial and physical. He also noted the unique architecture of the interior of the house and stated that a lot of the interesting design depends on the different levels of living space. He explained that DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 8 of 27 given the disabilities of Mrs. Haseotes, these levels, which are accessible by.sets of stairs are, difficult for her to get to. He noted that the family has invested roughly $75,000 on architects, engineers, and lawyers on the assumption the addition would be permitted. He further explained 4 that Mrs. Haseotes was having difficulty navigating the stairs in the house due to heart, hip, and back conditions, which have been getting increasingly worse. Attorney Weiner noted that the proposed addition was consistent with the architecture of the existing house and the size, bulk, and design of surrounding houses. He further explained that the design tried to accommodate concerns expressed by Commission staff and the Town while making the additional bulk as attractive as possible and consistent with existing surroundings as well as reduce it as much as possible while still addressing the Applicant's needs. Attorney Weiner explained that the proposed addition contains caregiver's accommodations, Mrs. Haseotes' bedroom, a bathroom, a den, a living area, and. a mudroom. He explained this provides Mrs. Haseotes with the ability to provide for herself(with caregivers help) and that this space fits her needs without going beyond them. Mr. Weiner reiterated the deed restrictions that were agreed to by the Applicant as identified earlier by Commission staff and also noted the plumbing fixtures in the existing home would be upgraded to low flow fixtures. He stated that this project does not substantially derogate from the intent or purpose of the act. Ms. Jo Anne Miller Buntich stated that the original plans proposed roughly an 83% increase in structure size and the current plans represent roughly a 38% increase. She noted this is closer to the structure limitation of 25% that the DCPC regulations might include. She expressed appreciation for the deed restrictions and further stated that the town has no opinion on the subcommittee's ability to find and determine the extent of the hardship relief. Ms. Heidi Davis, Mrs. Haseotes' eldest daughter, stated that this is a very substantial financial hardship and her mother is not able to navigate through her home and is deteriorating fast. Ms. Davis stated that she currently uses a walker right now and will most likely end up in a wheelchair. Mr. Ari Haseotes, Mr. Haseotes' son, agreed with his sister's previous comments and also noted there has been substantial investment made and he explained that his concern is his mother and he would like the house to be as navigable and user friendly as possible for her. He noted that his mother has a significant heart issue and has gone through numerous procedures that required a defibrillator to get her heart back in rhythm. Mr. Bob Angelo and Mr. Dom Gautrau, two neighboring property owners, testified in support of the project. The subcommittee had questions regarding the expiration of the moratorium, the height of the utility area over the addition, local permitting, the length of the deed restrictions, the extent of the kitchen in the addition,the goals of the DCPC,nitrogen loading and wastewater flows, construction on the barrier beach, the FAST system, and Mrs. Haseotes' needs. DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 9 of 27 The public hearing was continued to the full Commission meeting on July 23, 2009 at 3:00 pm.at the First District Courthouse Assembly of Delegates Chamber in Barnstable, Massachusetts for the purpose of accepting further testimony on this Hardship Exemption application. Subcommittee meetiny,—June 15, 2009 A subcommittee meeting was held on June 15, 2009. The subcommittee deliberated on whether the Applicant has met her burden of proving a hardship exists, financial or otherwise, and whether the proposed addition presents a substantial detriment to the public good or nullify or substantially derogate from the intent or purpose of the Cape Cod Commission Act. Attorney Weiner outlined the Applicant's financial hardship and stated that approximately $75,000 was spent on architects, engineers, and legal counsel prior to the DCPC nomination. The subcommittee had questions for the Applicant regarding Mrs. Haseotes' disabilities and the architecture of the existing residence. Ms. Brookshire noted that the applicant was both Mr. and Mrs. Haseotes and the emphasis at the time of the application and up until his passing, was on Mr. Haseotes' condition and need for a handicap accessible addition to accommodate his needs. As Mrs. Haseotes is now the sole applicant, Ms. Brookshire asked when Mrs. Haseotes' condition deteriorated to the extent that an addition and caretaker was needed to fill her needs. Attorney Weiner explained that Mr. Haseotes' condition was so severe (as he was wheelchair bound) that when the application was filed they chose to focus only on him. He noted that Mrs. Haseotes' health conditions predate January 2009 by several years and have gotten worse. The subcommittee asked for clarification on the fact that the original plans were not solely to accommodate any physical disabilities but instead appeared to provide more space for family and recreational activities. Attorney Weiner noted he was not part of the project at that point but when he was retained he looked at the plans and realized the addition was roughly 5,000 square feet of space. He explained to the Haseotes family that that he would want to see the addition relate directly to the hardship. The subcommittee had questions and deliberated on the size of the addition and the type of rooms it included, Mrs. Haseotes' medical disabilities, and whether Mrs. Haseotes is capable of self-care. Ms. Davis testified that she has rearranged both her and her small children's lives in order to be on the Cape with her mother this summer. She noted that her mother's heart condition is very severe and precludes her from taking the stairs. She explained that they are working on finding a health care provider who can live in the house with her. Ms. Davis testified that her mother needs assistance with shopping and driving but increasingly needs assistance to bathe. She stated that her mother is able to feed herself and could do the food preparation if everything was accessible. Ms. Davis stated that her mother stopped driving sometime this winter and that technically she still has a license but she doesn't drive at all. Ms. Davis also stated her mother would eventually have a caretaker during the summer months. DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 10 of 27 Mr. Richardson noted that there were six months between when the DCPC nomination was made and when it was recorded at the registry of deeds. He asked why the Applicant waited so long to file for a Hardship Exemption. Mr. Tolley stated that a substantial amount of work was done before the DCPC was in place. He noted that the original plan was not likely to pass as a Hardship Exemption and he worked with the firm Nutter, McClennen, and Fish for six months drawing various plans for the family until one was agreed on. Commission staff noted that the subcommittee has to decide whether a literal enforcement of the act involves a substantial hardship, financial or otherwise and if they find there is a hardship, then they must decide if desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the act. Mr. Weiner noted that he worked with Commission staff to address their concerns.. Ms. Brookshire noted that the purpose of the DCPC moratorium is to allow the Town of Barnstable time to create regulations that will protect the natural resources on the barrier beach area and Centerville River. She noted that one concern she has is the issue of community character. Mr. Richardson noted that the house is big to begin with and he would like to see another design for the addition. Mr. Tolley answered that this is the fifteenth version of the plans for the addition and that nine iterations came as a result of feedback from the Commission. He explained that if the hardship were approved today he would have difficulty getting permits by September 10, 2009 when the DCPC implementing regulations are enabled. Mr. Putnam stated that he is not convinced a hardship exists, however he is very sympathetic to the Haseotes family. Mr. Putnam stated that the only question they need to answer is if there is a hardship as defined by the regulations. He stated that he does not think that there is. Mr. Richardson stated that based on the testimony from Ms. Davis, Mrs. Haseotes' health is declining and if no action is taken now more significant action may need to be taken later. He stated that he believes there is a hardship. Mr. Richardson stated that Mrs. Haseotes' condition is creating the hardship and granting the project by allowing the creation of a handicapped accessible addition would be the relief necessary to address it. Ms. Brookshire stated she believes there is a hardship as well but wasn't sure if it was substantial enough to override the DCPC moratorium two weeks before the moratorium expires. Ms. Brookshire stated she wished she could hear testimony from Mrs. Haseotes or a doctor's report on Mrs. Haseotes. Ms. Brookshire stated that she had reservations about voting today and would like a doctor's report that would help convince her this hardship is so substantial that the applicant can't wait ,until the DCPC moratorium ends. She noted that this is a very emotional issue that will have to be decided based on the facts and testimony presented. She stated she would like to vote without having any reservations and be able to explain her position in good faith to the Town. She reiterated in order to feel this way she will need to see a doctor's report. DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 11 of 27 Mr. Weiner answered that he will provide one. Mr. Weiner asked Mr. Putnam if a physician's letter, which documents Mrs. Haseotes' condition in terms of the physical nature of the hardship, would help him change his opinion. Mr. Putnam stated it would interest him and depending on what it says it could persuade him. Subcommittee meeting—June 25, 2009 After receiving a letter from Mrs. Haseotes' physician, a subcommittee meeting was held on June 25, 2009. At that meeting,the subcommittee deliberated on whether the Applicant has met its burden of proving a hardship exists by virtue of the DCPC moratorium. Ms. Brookshire stated that she feels there is both a financial and an `otherwise' hardship. She noted that the Applicant spent$75,000 based on the assumption that the addition could be built. She noted the original plans depicted an addition that deviated from the purpose of the hardship request; to make a livable, year round addition for first Mr. Haseotes and now Mrs. Haseotes. She also noted that many revisions of the plans have been made, and the square footage has decreased dramatically from approximately 4,200 s.f. to 1,937 s.f. as a result of cooperation between the Applicant, staff, and Town. She also noted the legal, architectural and engineering expenses that the Applicant has incurred and the fact that the architect stated that nine plans out . of the fifteen different versions for the addition came as a result of Commission staff input. She stated that the financial hardship was created in part, due to the willingness of the Haseotes family to take the concerns of the Town, Commission staff, and subcommittee into consideration. She rioted she believes there is both a financial and physical hardship. Ms. Brookshire moved that a financial hardship exists. Mr. Putnam seconded the motion for discussion purposes. Ms. Brookshire noted that if the subcommittee finds there is no financial hardship, then the $75,000 that has already been expended on the project would be for naught. Ms. Brookshire stated she believes it qualifies as a financial hardship. Mr. Putnam noted that the Applicant's expenditures were made at their discretion and that they were not forced to make them. He stated that it is not a financial hardship as they spent the money because they wanted to, not because they had to. Mr. Putnam stated that the judgments made to spend the money were made before the Commission was involved and that the expenditures were made on a voluntary basis. Mr. Richardson said he also believes that losing$75,000 is a hardship. Ms. Brookshire called for a vote that there is a financial hardship. The motion passed with two in favor and Mr. Putnam opposed. Ms. Brookshire noted that §23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act states a hardship can be P P financial or otherwise. She stated she would like to discuss the `otherwise' aspect of this hardship. DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 12 of 27 Ms. Brookshire read the testimony from Ari. Haseotes on page seven of the June 10, 2009 minutes, "He explained his concern is his mother and he would like the house to be as navigable and user friendly as possible for her. He noted that his mother has a significant heart issue and has gone through numerous procedures that required a defibrillator to get her heart back in rhythm." Mr. Richardson moved to adopt this verbal testimony as a finding that Mrs. Haseotes has a physical hardship, and Ms. Brookshire seconded the motion. The motion passed with Mr. Richardson and Ms. Brookshire voting in support of the motion and Mr. Putnam voting in opposition. Ms. Brookshire read the testimony from on page seven of the June 10, 2009 minutes, "Ms.' Heidi Davis noted she was Mrs. Haseotes' eldest daughter. She explained she was here to reinforce Mr. Weiner's comments that this is a very substantial financial hardship. She also noted her mother is not able to navigate through her home and is deteriorating fast.." Ms. Brookshire noted the subcommittee received a letter from Eric Weber, M.D., Mrs. Haseotes' physician, dated June 16, 2009 discussing Mrs. Haseotes' physical capabilities. Mr. Richardson moved to adopt the verbal testimony of Ms. Davis and written testimony of Eric Weber M.D. as findings that a physical hardship exists, and Mr. Putnam seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Ms. Brookshire stated that the design of the house is extremely difficult for Mrs. Haseotes to navigate, as there are.many different levels of living space. She stated due to the houses unique design, it would be extremely detrimental to gut the inside and renovate it in order to be more wheelchair accessible. Mr..Putnam noted Mrs. Haseotes doesn't currently need a wheelchair, and she could ambulate on a ramp that could be installed in the existing house. Mr. Weiner stated given the steepness of the ramp, getting up or down would cause problems for Mrs. Haseotes. He noted the letter from the Doctor suggested the current plans fill all of Mrs Haseotes' present and future needs. Mr. Richardson noted Mrs. Haseotes is very ill and if the Doctor stated Mrs. Haseotes needs these accommodations they should vote on the issue and move on. Mr. Richardson moved that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise to the applicant. Mr. Putman seconded the motion for discussion purposes. The motion passed with Ms. Brookshire and Mr. Richardson voting in support of the motion and Mr. Putnam voting in opposition of the motion. Mr. Richardson made a motion that the desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the act. Ms. Brookshire seconded the motion and the motion passed with Mr. Richardson and Ms. Brookshire voting in support of the motion, and Mr. Putnam opposed. DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 13 of 27 Ms. Brookshire noted the subcommittee has received written testimony from abutters and oral testimony from Mr. Bob Angelo and Mr. Dom Gautrau in support of the project. She reiterated the'subcommittee should also consider testimony from the family and from Mrs. Haseotes' doctor. She noted the project will not contribute nitrogen to the Centerville river watershed and that most of the MPS have been met. Ms. Brookshire noted that a concern is the fact the house is increasing its footprint on a barrier beach. She stated that by approving the hardship, the subcommittee is saying the Applicant has met the MPSs to the maximum extent feasible and that the addition is absolutely necessary for Mrs. Haseotes to continue living in her house. Mr. Putnam stated the project does not conform to the intent of the Act. He stated that it is increasing the size of a building that is located on a barrier beach, in direct conflict with MPS 2.2.2.3. Ms. Brookshire noted that moving the septic system outside of the Centerville river watershed is an overall improvement to the recharge area of the watershed. She stated that the FAST system would also decrease the nitrogen load. Ms. Brookshire noted that the area is mapped as Endangered Species Habitat, however any concerns they had could be addressed at the local level. She noted that the DCPC purpose is partially to protect and preserve the waterfront and the shoreline from inappropriate use. She noted the land is a FEMA mapped A-zone. She noted that the house is designed to have an elevation of 12 feet, one foot higher than necessary, and that the new addition will be on pilings to protect it in the case of a flood. She noted that Community Character was originally a concern,however the size of the house had decreased substantially and that the view corridor has increased and will remain as such through the deed restriction. She noted that the house is increasing the footprint on a barrier beach but that the subcommittee could vote that it was the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship. Ms Brookshire stated she was looking for a motion to adopt her statements as findings as she just outlined. Mr. Richardson made the motion. Mr. Putnam seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Richardson moved to adopt the deed restrictions on page eight of the staff report as a condition to the decision. Mr. Richardson identified the deed restrictions as: 1) a view corridor restriction that would prohibit structures within the 30' westerly side yard setback; require the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of the vegetation(subject to and in accordance with Conservation Commission approval); 2)the house with the proposed addition represents full build-out on the property (no further expansions, additions or changes to the bulk of the structure) 3); a bedroom restriction;and 4)the use would be restricted to single family only;no accessory apartments. Mr. Putnam seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Mr..Richardson moved that the relief granted relates directly to the nature of the hardship and is the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship and that the Applicant has shown that a DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 14 of 27 hardship exists. Ms. Brookshire seconded the motion. The motion passed with Mr. Richardson and Ms. Brookshire voting in support, and Mr. Putnam opposed. Mr. Putnam stated he was voting in opposition of the project for three reasons. The first being he does not believe a hardship exists, the second being it is not the minimum relief that can be granted to allow her to live in her home, and the third being it does not support the purposes of the DCPC. Mr. Richardson moved to direct staff to draft a decision approving the hardship with conditions, which will include the testimony and findings and conditions as discussed today. Mr. Putnam seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Subcommittee meeting—July 14 2009 On July 14, 2009, the subcommittee met to review the draft decision. Ms. Senatori reviewed the draft decision and ran through a brief summary of the project, the procedural history, materials submitted for the record, testimony from the public hearings and subcommittee meetings, Cape Cod Commission jurisdiction over the project, and the standard of review for the project, which includes §23 of the Act, the standard for hardship exemptions. She reviewed each individual general, natural resource, community character, and coastal resource finding. She stated that at the June 25,2009 public meeting, the subcommittee found that the Applicant fulfilled the burden of showing that the DCPC moratorium had created a hardship. She noted that the subcommittee found that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve waiting until after the DCPC regulations are drafted in September 2009 to permit and construct the addition.. She stated that at the June 25, 2009 meeting, the subcommittee found that relief from this requirement may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Act, and that the relief being granted relates directly to the nature of the identified hardship and is the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship. She noted that all of this was substantiated in the findings of the decision as she previously outlined. She noted that the decision approves the project with conditions and reviewed each of the general conditions. She noted that general condition number five places the following deed restrictions on the property: a view corridor restriction prohibiting structures within the 30' westerly side yard setback, and requiring the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of the vegetation (subject to and in accordance with approval by local boards); that the house with the proposed addition represents full build-out on the property (no further expansions, additions or changes to the bulk of the structure); a bedroom restriction limiting the total number of bedrooms within the existing house and addition to six; and the use of the residence and property is restricted to single-family use only; including, but not limited to, prohibiting accessory apartments. She continued to review with the subcommittee each of the water resources conditions, community character conditions, and coastal resources conditions. Ms. Brookshire stated that previously,JoAnne Miller-Buntich (Interim Director of Growth Management for the Town of Barnstable) had concerns with the roof height of the addition. She noted that Ms. Buntich wanted to see the roof height slightly decreased. She stated that the Applicant's architect previously explained to the subcommittee why decreasing the roof height DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 15 of 27 isn't feasible, as space is needed for mechanical equipment and ductwork. She stated that she would like testimony from the architect adopted as a finding. Mr. Richardson agreed. Ms. Senatori stated she would amend the draft decision accordingly. Ms. Cox added that this testimony was presented during the July 10, 2009 public hearing and at the June 15, 2009 subcommittee meeting. Ms. Wielgus suggested that this be added to general finding 14, which adopts other testimony from the architect. Mr. Putnam stated he has no concerns with the draft decision but disagrees with the approval of the project.. Mr. Richardson made a motion to adopt the decision as amended, approving with conditions the hardship exemption application of Joyce Haseotes. Mr.-Putnam seconded the motion and the motion passed with Mr. Richardson and Ms. Brookshire voting in support and Mr. Putnam voting in opposition. Ms. Brookshire stated she was looking for a motion to forward the draft decision, as amended, to the full Commission for the July 23,2009 meeting. Mr. Richardson made the motion, and Mr. Putnam seconded it. The motion passed unanimously. JURISDICTION The Site is located within the Craigville Beach DCPC, which is an area that is currently subject to a building permit moratorium. The purpose of the moratorium is to allow the town to develop implementing regulations that will be applicable to the area and protect the resources identified in the nomination process In accordance with Section I I(c) of the Act, the power of a municipality to grant development permits is suspended until the implementing regulations are effective. However, during the moratorium, the Act allows a municipality to grant a development permit"for development within the district if. (1) the commission has certified in its acceptance of the nomination that the type or class of proposed development is not substantially detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare and does not contravene the purposes of this act and a development by-law or by-laws had been in effect immediately prior to the nomination of such areas and development permits could have been granted until the by-laws; or (2) a development has received approval as a development of regional impact within the seven year period next preceding the nomination of the geographic area in which said development is located, in whole or in part and such approval is still valid; or (3) a development of regional impact has been referred to the commission for review prior to the first published notice of the nomination of a district of critical planning DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 16 of 27 concern in which said development is located, in whole or in part, and subsequently is approved; or (4) a development is authorized by a development agreement which has been approved by the commission and the relevant municipality or municipalities; or (5) the commission has not expressly found in accepting a nomination that the issuance of development permits for a single-family house or houses on lots held in common ownership or on lots in separate ownership may be substantially detrimental to the protection of the public health, safety and welfare or in light of the factors specified in clauses (1) and(2) of subsection (a) of section ten,might contravene the purposes of this act." The proposed development does not fall into any of these exceptions provided by the Act. When the DCPC was created, the Cape Cod Commission issued a DCPC Acceptance Decision dated February 21, 2008 (the"Decision") that described the resources and provided guidelines for the future implementing regulations. The Decision states"[t]he Commission further finds that in accepting the nomination of the DCPC that the issuance of development permits for a single-family home...may be substantially detrimental to the protection of the public health, safety and welfare...including...the presence of significant natural, coastal,water cultural, architectural, historic resources and...might contravene the purposes of the Act." Furthermore,.the Decision lists development allowed to continue during the DCPC moratorium. Included in this list is"[n]ormal and customary repair or maintenance to a single-family home as determined by the Barnstable Building Commissioner. Such repair shall not increase the number of bedrooms or wastewater disposal capacity or result in an increase in impervious area" and"[n]ormal and customary repair or maintenance to existing open air decks without structural or other cover that are not entirely impervious and does not increase decked.area." . The Decision states "[p]ursuant to Section 11(c) of the Cape Cod Commission Act, `the acceptance of a nomination for consideration for designation as a district of critical planning concern shall continue to suspend the power of a municipality to grant development permits for development within the nominating district...."' In accordance with the Decision, an applicant may apply for a hardship exemption for"any development that can demonstrate that suspension of action on a local development permit application during the limited moratorium constitutes a substantial hardship." Further, "[h]ardship applications will be heard by the Cape Cod Commission...in accordance with Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act." Section 23 of the Act states that the Commission may "grant an exemption, in whole or in part and with appropriate conditions...where the commission specifically finds that.a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the applicant and that desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the act." DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 17 of 27 The intent/purpose of the Commission Act in allowing for a moratorium while implementing regulations are being developed for a DCPC is to provide a"time out" for development for an identified area so that implementing regulations may be developed. The intent of the Act in developing a Regional Policy Plan is to "present a coherent set of regional planning policies and objectives to guide development...to protect the region's resources, which shall reflect and reinforce the goals and purposes set out in section one." (Commission Act §7) One of the goals and purposes of Section One is the preservation of coastal resources. The planning section of the coastal resources section of the RPP identifies that an"important consideration for coastal floodplain management is factoring relative sea-level rise into development projects." A specific goal of the DCPC decision is to "preserve and enhance flood hazard protected provided by the barrier beach, estuarine and tidal marsh systems for coastal properties in the Craigville Beach District." One of the main issues identified by both the Act and this DCPC itself is the concern of development upon a barrier beach. These interests must be weighed against the standards for a Hardship Exemption, which is the only exception provided from this moratorium of the Craigville DCPC as outlined in the DCPC decision. As such,the Enabling Regulations governing the Hardship process must be applied. The Enabling Regulations in its requirements in allowing a Hardship Exemption directs that compliance with the RPP to the"maximum extent feasible" is required. Additionally, the Commission's Enabling Regulations state "Projects should comply to the maximum extent feasible with the Minimum Performance Standards of the Regional Policy Plan (RPP). Any relief granted from the requirements of the Minimum Performance Standards shall relate directly to the nature of the identified hardship and shall be the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship." The Commission must consider the purposes of the Act, which includes protection of coastal, natural historic architectural, cultural values and the purpose of the preservation of coastal resources, the protection of groundwater, surface water and ocean water quality, as well as other natural resources of Cape Cod, as well as the preservation of historic, cultural, archeological, architectural and other recreational values. In order to determine whether relief could be granted without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent/purpose of the Act, the Commission must also consider the intent of the Act in developing a Regional Policy Plan as well as the intent of the DCPC itself. The purpose of regulating development in the barrier beach area as identified in the Craigville DCPC decision is to protect natural resources including the barrier beach,prevention of flood damage, protection of public health and safety,reduction of risk to people, property and municipal safety and from storm surge and sea rise. FINDINGS DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 18 of 27 The Commission has considered the application of Joyce Haseotes, and based on consideration of such application and upon the information presented at the public hearings and submitted for the record,makes the following findings pursuant to Section 23 of the Act: General Findings: GF 1. The Commission finds that the Applicant is Joyce Haseotes. The Hardship Exemption, application was submitted naming both Byron and Joyce Haseotes as joint Applicants. However, Byron Haseotes passed away on May 25, 2009, during the timeframe of the review of this application. GF2. As the first substantive hearing was held on January 13, 2009,the RPP in effect at this time is the 2002 RPP. GF3. The Site consists of 0.66 acre at 293 Long Beach Road in Centerville identified by the Town of Barnstable as Assessor's Map 185 Parcel 34. A 5,150 s.f. residence, constructed in 1929 and owned by Byron and Joyce Haseotes, is currently on the site. GF4. The addition is proposed in accordance with the following plans, which are attached to this decision as Exhibit A: Proposed Conditions for: The Haseotes Family, prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. of Yarmouthport, MA, and dated June 4, 2009 o Sheet No. A-1 Proposed Exterior Elevations (Exhibit A-1) 0 Sheet No. A-2 Proposed First Floor Plan(Exhibit A-2) • Septic System Design plan,prepared by P.M.P Associates of East Bridgewater, MA, and dated April 27, 2007 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009 (Exhibit A- 3) • High Strength Fast 1.0 Septic System Design Details plan, prepared by P.M.P Associates of East Bridgewater, MA, and dated December 11, 2008 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009 (Exhibit A-4) GF5. The Commission finds that the purpose of the Craigville Beach DCPC as stated in the Commission's Acceptance of DCPC Nomination.Decision dated February 21, 2008, is to address redevelopment concerns in the Craigville Beach District by allowing the town to plan and adopt zoning strategies that will provide additional protections to guide redevelopment in a way.that contributes to and respects the character and historic development patterns of the area,protects natural resources including but not limited to the barrier beach, groundwater and coastal water quality, prevents flood damage,protects public health and safety and reduces the risk to people, property and municipal safety personnel from storm damage and relative sea level rise. The Commission's Acceptance of DCPC Nomination Decision states "[t]he Commission further finds that in accepting the nomination of the DCPC that the issuance of development permits for a single-family home...may be substantially detrimental to the,' protection of the public health, safety and welfare...including...the presence of significant natural, coastal, water cultural, architectural, historic resources and...might contravene the purposes of the Act." Furthermore, the Decision lists development DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 19 of 27 allowed to continue during the DCPC moratorium. Included in this list is "[n]ormal and customary repair or maintenance to a single-family home as determined by the Barnstable Building Commissioner. Such repair shall not increase the number of bedrooms or wastewater disposal capacity or result in an increase in impervious area" and"[n]ormal and customary repair or maintenance to existing open air decks without structural or other cover that are not entirely impervious and does not increase decked area." GF6. The following chronology of events describes the important milestones in the DCPC process and includes key dates associated with the Applicant's project: September 14, 1987 Applicant: All Cape Engineering prepared"Sketch Plan of Land" December 15, 1992 Applicant: Taylor Design Associates prepared Revision-A site plan "for conservation" December 9, 2006 Applicant: Mike Perrault prepared Site Plan identified as "Preliminary Plans for: Byron&Joyce Haseotes" April 27, 2007 Applicant: P.M.P. Associates, LLC prepare"Septic System Design" plan February 12, 2008 DCPC: First Nomination received for Craigville Beach and Centerville Village area DCPC February 15, 2008 DCPC: Notice of Nomination consideration-starts full moratorium February 21, 2008 DCPC: DCPC nomination accepted by the Commission, full moratorium ended, limited moratorium began April 3, 2008 DCPC: Commission voted to forward to Assembly of Delegates for designation as a DCPC April 11, 2008 Applicant: Division of Fisheries and Wildlife correspondence May 21, 2008 DCPC:Assembly of Delegates approves DCPC ordinance June 4, 2008 DCPC: County Commissioners approved June 13, 2008 DCPC: DCPC ordinance recorded at the Registry of Deeds September 23, 2008 Applicant: ERT Architects, Inc. prepared"Proposed Conditions"plans October 14, 2008 Applicant: Submission of Project Notification Form to the Massachusetts Historical Society December 18, 2009 Applicant: Hardship Exemption application complete April 15, 2009 Applicant: Submitted revised plans and materials to the Commission June 3-8, 2009 Applicant: Submitted revised plans and materials to the Commission June 12, 2009 DCPC: One year to complete implementing regulations September 10, 2009 DCPC: 907day extension to complete implementing regulations GF7. The Commission finds that the existing residence totals 5,150 s.f. (3,370 s.f on the first floor,and 1,792 s.f. on the second floor). The Applicant proposes a 1,937 s.f one-floor addition to the existing residence. Hardship relief is sought to allow for the issuance of local permits for this addition during the Craigville Beach DCPC moratorium. GF8. The Commission finds that the Applicant has agreed to place the following deed restrictions in perpetuity upon the property (as outlined in GC6): 1) A view corridor restriction prohibiting structures within the 30' westerly side yard setback, and requiring the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of the vegetation(subject to and in accordance with approval by local boards); DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 20 of 27 2) That the house with the proposed addition represents full build-out on the property (no further expansions, additions or changes to the bulk of the structure); 3) A bedroom restriction limiting the total number of bedrooms within the existing house and addition to six (6); and 4) The use of the residence and property is restricted to single-family use only; including, but not limited to, prohibiting accessory apartments. GF9. The Commission adopts the testimony of the Applicant's counsel and finds that the Applicant expended approximately $75,000 on attorney's fees, engineers, and architects for the proposed addition plans prior to the DCPC moratorium. GF 10. The Commission adopts the oral testimony of Ari Haseotes and finds that the Applicant has a significant heart issue and has gone through numerous procedures that required a defibrillator to*get her heart back in rhythm. GF11. The Commission adopts the oral testimony of Heidi Davis and finds that the Applicant is not able to navigate through her home, that she is physically deteriorating fast,that she currently uses a walker, and that she will likely need a wheelchair soon. GF 12. The Commission adopts the written testimony of Dr. Eric Weber, Mrs. Haseotes' physician, and finds that Mrs. Haseotes has a heart condition, an arthritic hip, and back issues. The Commission further finds.based on Dr. Weber's testimony, that Mrs. Haseotes needs to avoid stairs, she must reduce her daily activities, and she must bring in help to assist her with basic functions, including cooking, bathing, cleaning, and driving. Additionally, based on Dr. Weber's testimony,the Commission finds that given Mrs. Haseotes' present limitations and the difficulties posed by the existing multi-level house, new living space on one floor and a live-in caregiver are immediate needs of Mrs. Haseotes. Finally,the Commission finds based on Dr. Weber's testimony,that the proposed addition represents a direct and necessary response to Mrs. Haseotes' physical limitations and requirements. GF 13. The Commission adopts the testimony of Erik Tolley, the Applicant's architect, and finds that the unique architecture and multiple levels of living space in the existing residence prohibit its renovation or rehabilitation to provide for handicapped-accessible living areas. Additionally,the Commission adopts the testimony of Mr. Tolley and finds that the need to house the duct work, mechanical equipment, and electrical equipment in the attic space above the addition prohibits a decrease in the roof height. GF14. The Commission finds that based on written and oral testimony,that six abutters and/or neighboring property owners support the project. GF15. The Commission adopts the testimony of Michael Perrault, the Applicant's engineer, and finds that the project will not contribute nitrogen to the Centerville River watershed, which is an impaired watershed. GF16. By virtue of the addition,the Commission finds that the project does not meet MPS 2.2.2.3, which allows existing structures on barrier beaches or coastal dunes to be DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 21 of 27 "reconstructed or renovated,provided there is no increase in floor area, footprint, or intensity of use." GF 17. The Commission finds that the Applicant requires wheelchair-accessible living space, caretaker's quarters, and a reasonable connection to the existing residence. The Commission finds the proposed 1,937 s.f. one-floor plan is the minimum relief necessary to accommodate Mrs. Haseotes' disabilities. GF 18. Based on Finding GF9,the Commission finds that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve substantial financial hardship. The Commission further finds that the Applicant has fulfilled its burden to demonstrate a financial hardship exists. GF 19. Based on Findings GF 10 through GF 13, the Commission finds that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve substantial"otherwise" hardship. The Commission further finds.that the Applicant has fulfilled its burden to demonstrate that an"otherwise"hardship exists. GF20. The Commission finds that relief from the moratorium may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Act. GF21. The Commission finds that the project complies to the maximum extent feasible with the Minimum Performance Standards of the Regional Policy Plan. GF22. Based on Findings GF 16.through GF 17, the Commission finds that the relief granted from the requirements of the Minimum Performance Standards relates directly to the nature of the identified hardship and is the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship. Water Resources Findings: WRF1. The Commission finds that the Town of Barnstable has identified the District in its Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan as a priority area for a sewage-collection system. A goal of the DCPC ordinance is to provide the Town of Barnstable with an opportunity to develop regulations protective of water quality and to evaluate sewer- neutral policy options for the District. WRF2. The Commission finds that the project will expand an existing home resulting in two (2) new bedrooms. The Applicant has agreed to record a deed restriction with the Town of Barnstable thereby restricting the number of bedrooms to six(6) and effectively limiting Title-5 wastewater flows to 660 gallons per day (gpd). WRF3. The Applicant has agreed to refit the house's entire plumbing system with low-flow fixtures. The Commission finds that these measures will limit wastewater flows, consistent with a goal of the DCPC ordinance to provide the Town of Barnstable with an opportunity to evaluate sewer-neutral policy options for the District. DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 22 of 27 WRF4. The Commission finds that the project will result in a net reduction in nitrogen load to groundwater and thereby meets MPS 5.1 which requires development and redevelopment to maintain or improve water quality,where existing development exceeds an identified nitrogen-loading standard or where there are documented marine water quality problems. The net reduction in nitrogen load to groundwater will be achieved through use of a FAST® denitrifying septic system. Based on Technical Bulletin 91-001,the project will result in a nitrogen loading concentration of 5.6 milligrams per liter (mg-N/L or ppm-N). WRF5. The Commission finds that the project meets RPP MPS 3.1, which requires development to meet critical nitrogen limits for nitrogen-sensitive estuaries. The project site straddles the Centerville River watershed boundary shown on RPP Water Resource Map II and delineated by the Massachusetts Estuaries Project, a collaborative program that provides technical support to MADEP as it implements provisions of the Clean Water Act. The northwest corner of the site drains to the Centerville River, a nitrogen-sensitive estuary for which a Total Maximum Daily Load for nitrogen has been approved by USEPA. The proposed expansion of the house will occur outside the Centerville River watershed, in an area that drains to Nantucket Sound. The project will replace an existing cesspool on the south (Nantucket Sound) side of the house with a FAST® system proposed for the north (Centerville River) side of the house and the septic layout plan was modified on March 30, 2009 to shift the septic soil absorption system (SAS) from the Centerville River watershed. Natural Resources Findings: NRF 1. The Commission finds that the property is located in a Significant Natural Resource Area, wetland resource areas, and a Riverfront Area. The site is also located on Long Beach, a barrier beach, the coastal beach portion of which is mapped as endangered species habitat. NRF2. The Commission finds that the project has components that will require review and consideration by local boards for consistency with state and local wetland regulations,but that due to the nature of the actual area to be developed and the project's proximity to other development, impacts of regional significance to natural habitat resources are not anticipated. Community Character Findings: CCF1. The.Commission finds that the Craigville Beach DCPC was created primarily out of response to out-of-scale development of single-family homes. When the DCPC was designated by the Assembly of Delegates, it noted.the threat posed by the siting and massing of redeveloped residences, which could affect the historic character of the area, and eliminate,viewsheds to Nantucket Sound. To address these concerns about building bulk, neighborhood scale, and views to the water, the town is developing new regulations for the area. CCF2. The proposed project involves an addition to an existing waterfront residence on Long Beach Road. The Commission finds that although the proposed addition represents an DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 23 of 27 increase in building mass and building footprint, it is in keeping with the scale and height of buildings in the neighborhood. CCF3. The existing residence is approximately 75 feet wide, spanning roughly half of the 150- wide lot. The Commission finds that the proposed addition would span over approximately 38 feet, leaving an approximately 30-foot wide open area on the west side of the lot. The Applicant has agreed to a deed restriction that would prohibit structures within the 30-foot westerly side yard setback and require the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of the vegetation in this area, maintaining an open view across the property to the water. Coastal Resources Findings: CRF1. The Commission finds that the property is located entirely within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage, is FEMA-mapped A-Zone, and the entire parcel is designated as barrier beach. CRF2. RPP MPS 2.2.2.2 requires elevation of a structure in an A-zone to accommodate for sea level rise rates of one foot over the next 100 years. The Commission finds that the Applicant has committed to constructing the addition with the lowest member of the structure having an elevation of at least 12 feet NGVD, in accordance with plans entitled Proposed Conditions for: The Haseotes Family, Sheet No. A-1 Proposed Exterior Elevations,prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. of Yarmouthport, MA, and dated June 4, 2009. CRF3. The Commission finds that the addition will be on piers, there will not be vegetated mounds around the addition, and that the latticework around the piers will allow floodwaters to freely flow under the addition and will be designed in a manner that would break away during a severe storm event. CRF4. RPP MPS 2.2.2.3 requires that existing structures on barrier beach may be reconstructed or renovated"provided there is no increase in floor area, footprint, or intensity of use." The Commission finds that by virtue of the addition, the Applicant does not meet this standard. However,the Commission further finds that relief from this standard is the minimum relief necessary. Based on the findings above,the Commission hereby concludes: 1) The Applicant has fulfilled its burden to show that the DCPC moratorium creates a hardship. A literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve waiting until after the DCPC regulations are drafted in September 2009 to permit and construct the addition. Relief from this requirement may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Act. The relief granted relates directly to the nature of the identified hardship and is the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship. The Cape Cod Commission hereby approves with conditions the Hardship Exemption application of Joyce Haseotes, provided the following conditions are met: DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 24 of 27 CONDITIONS General Conditions: GC1. The addition shall be constructed in accordance with the following plans, which are attached to this decision as Exhibit A: • Proposed Conditions for: The Haseotes Family, prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. of Yarmouthport,MA, and dated June 4, 2009 o Sheet No. A-1 Proposed Exterior Elevations (Exhibit A-1) o Sheet No. A-2 Proposed First Floor Plan(Exhibit A-2) • Septic System Design plan,prepared by P.M.P Associates of East Bridgewater, MA, and dated April 27, 2007 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009 (Exhibit A- 3) • High Strength Fast 1.0 Septic System Design Details plan, prepared by P.M.P Associates of East Bridgewater, MA, and dated December 11, 2008 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009 (Exhibit A-4) Any deviation from the above plans shall require approval by the Commission through a modification of this decision, pursuant to the Modifications section of the Commission's Enabling Regulations. The Applicant shall submit to the Commission any additional information deemed necessary to evaluate any modifications to the approved plans. GC2. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this decision. GC3. No development work, as the term "development" is defined in the Act, shall be undertaken until all appeal.periods have elapsed or, if such an appeal has been filed, until all judicial proceedings have been completed. GC4. The Applicant agrees to allow Commission staff to enter onto the property,which is the subject of this decision at reasonable times and after reasonable notice for the purpose of determining whether the conditions contained in the decision are met. GCS. The Applicant shall place the following deed restrictions in perpetuity upon the property: 1) A view corridor restriction prohibiting structures within.the 30'westerly side yard setback, and requiring the planting of low growing vegetation and maintenance of the height of the vegetation(subject to and in accordance with approval by local boards); 2) That the house with the proposed addition represents full build-out on the property (no further expansions, additions or changes to the bulk of the structure); 3) A bedroom restriction limiting the total number of bedrooms within the existing house and addition to six (6); and 4) The use of the residence and property is restricted to single-family use only; including, but not limited to, prohibiting accessory apartments. DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 25 of 27 Prior to a full Commission vote on the Hardship Exemption application, the Applicant shall submit copies of the draft deed restrictions to Commission staff and Town of Barnstable counsel for review and approval. Prior to obtaining a building permit for the addition, the Applicant shall provide copies of the recorded deed restrictions to Commission staff and the Director of Growth Management for the Town of Barnstable. GC6. After the completion of construction for the project, the Applicant shall obtain a Final Certificate of Compliance from the Commission, which states that all conditions in this decision pertaining to the project have been met. Water Resources Conditions: WRC1. The Applicant shall limit Title 5 wastewater flows to 660 gallons per day. WRC2. The Applicant shall refit the house's entire plumbing system with low-flow fixtures. WRC3. The Applicant shall install a FAST® denitrifying septic system as shown on Septic System Design plan, prepared by P.M.P Associates of East Bridgewater, MA (dated April 27, 2007 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009) and in accordance with the High Strength Fast 1.0 Septic System Design Details plan, prepared by P.M.P Associates (dated December 11, 2008 with latest revision dated June 2, 2009). The soil absorption system shall be located outside the Centerville River watershed mapped as described in WRF5. WRC4. The Applicant shall remove or fill and disconnect the existing cesspool on the south side of the house. Community Character Conditions: CCC1. In accordance with Sheet No. A-1 Proposed Exterior Elevations,prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. of Yarmouthport, MA, and dated June 4, 2009,the maximum height of the addition shall be no higher than 23 feet 9 inches as measured from the ground to the highest roof peak. CCC2. The addition shall be constructed in accordance with Sheet No. A-2 Proposed First Floor Plan, prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. of Yarmouthport, MA, and dated June 4, 2009, which shows that the addition will provide living area only on the first floor, and no additional deck area shall be constructed. Coastal Resources Conditions: CRC1. The Applicant shall construct the addition with the lowest member of the structure having an elevation of at least 12 feet NGVD. CRC2. The Applicant shall construct the addition on piers and the latticework around the piers shall allow floodwaters to freely flow under the addition and shall be designed in a manner that would break away during a severe storm event. The Applicant shall not construct vegetated mounds around the addition. DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 26 of 27 The Cape Cod Commission hereby approves the application of Joyce Haseotes as a Hardship Exemption from the Craigville Beach DCPC pursuant to Section 23 of the Act, c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended. John D. Harris, Chair Date COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Barnstable, ss , 2009 Before me,the undersigned notary public,personally appeared , in his/her capacity as Chairman of the Cape Cod Commission, whose name is signed on the preceding document, and such person acknowledged to me that he/she signed such document voluntarily for its stated purpose. The identity of such person was proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was L] photographic identification with signature issued by a federal or state governmental agency, U oath or affirmation of a credible witness, or U personal knowledge of the undersigned. Notary Public My Commission Expires: r DRAFT Decision—7/23/09 Haseotes Addition—Hardship Exemption Page 27 of 27 Exhibit A-1 R. ERT ARCHITECTS,INC. ....._. _..__—._. a]flWTE BA UNIT B _ - YARMW7HPORT,MA 02675 t+�+:Y .. - � .• ___ lal(508)382-6683 - ......._ w as(SOB)302{BB3 .aoeaamm � ~LZ_+y^ ~ � PftOPo1EO CONODlON9 — ..-.ram 2Z. 4 -'•.• --- Raft: THE HASEOTES FAMILY -- — -- 293 LONG BEACH ROAD (FNT'ERVfi.LE,MA PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION .5, PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION _....L __---._._..- 90N5: 0 PPO IN.S SEi E ET RODRCSS SET PROPOSED LE FT ELEVATION UNLESS Oi TERNISC NOTED. ` &T IQ rMIT TOTAL NU'N SET. SNfETS 2 M:S SHEET:x UNLESS ACCO NINPNT EO BY O PROPOSED REAR EVAT ON r.. coNP¢rE SET oP I� j Exhibit A-2 ERT ARC=cTS,INC. 947 ROUTE 8A,UNIT 8 PO BOX 343 YARMOU7HPORT,MA 02675 to (508)382-8883 (Os(508)382-4883 PSOPOSSOCONOMONS FOB: P7n a �aRC THEHASEOTES FAMILY 293 LONG BEACH ROAD CENTBRVB.LE,MA DINING RGOM - SQUARE FOOTAGE BREAKDOWNS NEW DEN - ATEI: EXISTING: TM -- 1ST FLOOR GROSS: 3,370 SF LiVN RNO9FvI 9T - ROOM .. H 2ND FLOOR GROSS: 1,792 SF N: BEDROOM - INITIAL CONCEPT: G AREA ,^ - 1ST FLOOR GROSS: 2,192 SF a�<TF°'°1°' LIVIN .a� C?: 2ND FLOOR GROSS: 2,084 SF NEW .FOYER •' .: FIRST REVISION: Oa EITHBaroBT°..« NEW 1ST FLOOR GROSS: 1,937 SF o. - SIT GARB GIVER'S - Pf°uglE Ss[rET ACCOMODAT10N5 O 2ND FLOOR GROSS: 916 SF —ESS SET CURRE NT VERSION: GARAGe:'; 1ST FLOOR OR GROSS: 1937 SF REQSTBATOH FIRST FLOOR PLAN ° a 7 °MESS.— A.2 ' iOTAI EP OF 5 EETS H SET: n THIS SHEET IN— UMESS AttOUPANNO BT PIET_SET OF Exhibit A-3 Oxc..ND(FMD) NOT.TwLAME 6Axor"LLIMSEUNf ter' offew °' `� DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE #1 R� I...IRE(FN.) WITH THE GROUXD. AK . pATmot rudAa B 'p ,\T� mean R[xe,M (SCC.-D.) SOIL EVALUATOR: .�e R w5MMVs Re DATE:L= S SEEROMM L LOT AND LINE LONG BEACH 1.\GRIT Zr,wmmwr "u's-u'"Vv 41'Lo- SEAPPROVING AUTHORITY: - - G.S.EL=S]i_ PLAN NOTE REFERENCES 1 R DF xx M.D.Ya.DATU10•v[ [tFv. OFnN NagaoN sax RKNR[ Co1GR oMJxO 0Md p i m.IT"T"' C Mp VI[w A O-B• N SVNT IDxI IanOn NDM .DIr meL IMM Rv¢ 6 _ _-~\•T �� f C UBIEv-Ir BK 54BnIOV ImPM/! IMX[D HAYGUI oBSVC°GROUNDWATER(W[[PINE!SrAX01N0)T. � / ;`` °"+� 1' rgp,ym]' ppqq FILL �" D.n •PERCOLATION TEST Tpl RON PIPES(MD) 1 I I `4;( �' UC(SR"MDT[) L SOIL ,y g 1 1 II i I PERFORMED BY:�ATmcV x txx GATE:ine/D a I7I CONSTRUCTED Erosro DRIVEw•Y NOTE. ,p„p APPROVING By::: GOOD R.OFSMwxs.R.S. STRUEDwORIVEWpY IS TO [ CTEO PERVIOUS SURFACE DOM OF PERC SHELF_2l=Bi FL=A.= LOCUS MAP COMHO unon"['o TF ") //`gj%j/l a °unEln.YA nU1 Is TD BE DETERMIH[°. EROSION CONTROL BARRIER[ ° START PRE-SOAK- nMB P 9• END PRE-S.A IDaJ P f1 - m ic[GxosaPi v nAE D 12•_ [ _le's]_ nuE a.•_ I SPECIFICATIONS J 1 r / / / / ( LAN.) DETAIL (TYP1 •f{ I' 1 NOT TO SCALE i]GALLONS,COULD MDL M•IMTAIH li•• PER,RAT[. NOTES: DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE #2 I.TW¢WR�RP�TORN�D. IIFOGo KO OTABIIDB PRO A 1JN0 SOIL EVALUATOR: rAm¢ DATE:Jne/m M ono K M�rt x�IxRR Deon°RRVO 0.oi�Y°esia["iDJ°�D SYRVRT, K IRIS PLAN RE9UQtE5 APPROVAL T \ C \ TTHII PUN I@z.io a APPROVING AUTHORITY:DDxAUn M.xN G.S.EL=_e 1s y usr Rn \ .4'�°\ I y [RECO1roC0 Ar A R[m31RY Or OLEOS. [LLV. 0[mM NDRI20 SOIL IEYNR[x C06 D Rm]x uR.xfj w m sirtu i T`Kpi"mn Arf u' UNDER BARNSTABLE CODE $ /( L 1111'. X\� \ :Z')� a? 'r CHAPTER 380,ARTICLE HI, i r8 �� ..A- 3.MR��xYA*pMO RERPPF3FNfAnOMS W REMOO IDDBwdLAN05 lNKLHxwlE ii�t8 GEL-n.,W.1..C. v, THE SYSTEM urs AR[HOT.-RM B. rT. - N yler LDw In Hart R:Umuar mT]• \y drsnxG WATd T°TAS sT`%...ENYS u5 laGrz°-HIM A[CAT¢.. �• 1 � ME BLOWEP u w \\ >E� // xS y ..OF Me NO ADC.-HIGH CVAcm 11 23 i •THICK n UNIT IT00[BtAL.PLACED ON }I (I i[DiW�M��. °u (s[ ° )�Cd 1-1.N 05f°i°"nM,S rxu[T°TSP°i o R.C.wo wa srr.]DR v_Bo• c+ swo .30/.aF'J,MOVI M,n ON THE PCO [ O E iME R00° �¢ y `I1� /"]% s,Ile N - a-Lx ovwir Turf 1AvTHE P DFSI" `�' 11111 1�]I-•\'d r}fin o0� / // / 'frIt 41E.>)L' "C A rx[WSrAUFR YYsr m1UDW M!uT[91•SEPM°YG GE KO GRO HIDWATER(WEEPING A STANDING) IMTT•I3AnON u•xULL FOR IMixTGTOR OUKK 1 STAM3 COn01➢B Mrw e[1m m_[• A• J 1 1 1 (MUST YEEr Dq : / w ITT jDLTMre.STST.I.IN. rc.Iq aMw EAncrNK 11 )t 11- M eK' %�</ MB EADNHE:aT�." rzDEEPBSOBSERVATION HOLE #3 C01°IIV4LIMMT'"0[N9URC TN•T TN[1OIHT R°fl 1 I11 1 ;jL- \y, � \ 1. IS SITE Is NOT LOCATED IN A Do zaxc D. ° ]naror WAYLN TIGHT. a•C I ] ]1 1 - / 3 K(x.)ix SOIL EVALUATOR: DATE:_ Mxs wn e[M. p •OVE r TSTx rAn rum 1 1 II // e[[Ou1PCo w i STANoO°i°°A A xeoi�e"'OR APPROVING AUTHORITY: PGGIU+D - _ O.I EL.J]S_ T Y ADm ON [dI5TIN0 STSr[Y°[ t 11 L 1 1 1 I /x fG// - POWER SOURCE. 1. B[PM MOTETS..EX,TEKNRCRxCO.. MOTrUx O 11 A°STAx U5B ItACH�No TST YT."0�C C u1N'TEO SOILS 5wLL 0-a• N YAOr UMY I°rl0n M N¢R C ••�\ �'/ REQUIREMENT *SEE SHEET 2 FOR THE INSPECTIONUIREMENT EECL 0 VCD 10 A IfACNIxc Of EFNAFROM TURD AT� 'a �¢m 9-le B- SVIN'lWu 1 e NONE Wmx s:Mo"ui[ srtclncinar O i°ie R / D`1K`['r OR SCHEDULE REQUIRED PER 310 CMR 15,021 �x _ SYSRu x °F; I I AmDxxv pmoL n R_e0' CI YHD 2enH HO NB.TONE TNC Tfl qE 13 Tc BE I .- \Gu l��1e.x[xl lN[onuVO1 /t B]9 TS• OBS[RV[D O0.0UHDWARR(WEEPING R STANDING) PV P[0.C VSNED.AMO BACKnLLEG. �\ I' x °°� 1Kir'M<)u ixtt"° xn.umi,TH. [T0n"1n ,!��`�S3pRVlx�E WAS LOCATED FROM -r - PERCOLATION TEST T 3 pp 5 MARKS AND tt\I - PERFORMED BY:�AaK N nw_A L_DATE:3/]e/°] RT HAS A E BAGE T ]n_ APPROVING AUTHORITY: BwwO 0.0[suwls.R.s. p0 R THIS oEsi OH q[oulR[5 THAT n"IE TN�"UN RGROU�D��LTRIC[WAS IAGT[O \� -s'�I mxI°�11°wgm�. C 'OlRICKu 4m'� s f PERC MGARBAGE GRIXDO`R EYDVEA PRIOR TO THE FR LR AP 0 FUGS. �- 1 LL'ITum------.` °TARN 0 3NEU�➢_x6_ EL- S09 I ST/E... GRINDER HEW OHIMO _-_ -- _-ry START PRE-SOAK- tD 02 9• fN0 PR[-SOAK 101^ IF MF AR°AS GAINIS i REMOVE..OR g<rgvlc[.OTT: YI nM[a ti• nYL O _ 023- nYE a°• p0[R E RENS EO INSTALLED. ME FCISTIHO DWEWNO IS SERVED BY TOWN WATER. $ •23 GALLONS ..MN PERC RATE <3 TMII[SEA CONSIDERED v010E0. °sl APPROYIWTE LOCATION IS SHOWN. COVED NDT I2•• P. I -- - DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE #4 DESIGN CALCULATIONS - ------------------- / nMtr�[wAGf ROW: nNK SITEn xP Hmn PROPER -- _---_--R pxM 1 ie/n AWAY FROM:HALL PROVIDC 1-1 AIJ rESY/P.yi R.3 ,DATE: nIs A..VMe AWAY G THE L[ACNIHO SYSTEM *T - SOIL EVALUATOR: OONVD RNJJJewM m DATE:_ y-BEOROONS a IID GPD- UQ GPO •x0 ME BUxDINC SIRUEMR6. 1 -- ---------- - APPROVING AUTHORITY: ON vi- ---' -- OESIGHNOOw " 5(S CPO ME B5g V[ Oxll MC TOP.1 CHAMBER a--- [ld. 0 ]X NORIION SOIL RIINRC CO YOTIUIIC °M[R a: T ALLOWED(SEE NOTE) nON N � IFVAiI c1 LOR O.RRmf TO OES1cN Flow GPO cRlx REV•I MC 15 R.DISTANCE IS TO BE MEASUR[0 ---- -- ------ ADO IDOK ° TROY THE BORON OI115I0[EDG[OF TN[CHAMBERS. -- ----e 0-21• f FLL T�r'•°FlL TOTK DESIGN FLOW -.QS_ED .IS SLYOY IOW IMNE (P[R DO TPAHSMIRAL No.w02]0K9) s.N [I-31 M 1 rreX xAm A,omw .•mr cwNrc``Acm. of .oR ruYRNe xm[. •_------------------------------ _ IwAImx.Ylamr. _:��� . _----_-__ti r.e1 L-10' B. SNIT IOW IDmy HONE _ APPROK.jE HIGH WATER ___ _ I CI yp z3nn xdrt __OE31GN ROw x 32°GK TNC NRRIOp U'I. IM ME dl oN0 DW[RWNO ,� mK CAPAEYIY PgOw0E0%- GAL 10-DI• wD .vnt R` W IS TO BE UM RE-ROUTED TO ITHE.MCW N M-GRIN d [J[mOR PUMP.ALL INTERIOR I.N.H.SHALL y_-------------------Ym----�_--- '--'----'� -0']5 NULTP wCGmRM�COMPARTMENT LWN FOR CONFORM TO ALL STAR,AND LOLL PLUMBING CODES. -3 30/0T_ DED v0•COURT NOTE GROUNDWATER(01 B D A mAN ORCJ [w Pwue xD NOrzr __ ___ . NI C°MPMIMEM-SEMWN°ZONE: THE IEMOTN OF iNE BUIl01H0 5[WER FROM THE >------'---------- BEDROOM COUNT NOTE:THE NUMBER OF BEDROOM FOR THIS MIMMUM aPACm-f9$D_GK DESIGN IS BASED ON ED AD PLANS TOTE THE EXISTING DWEWNG GPACm PROWDEO -�5➢3_CK •DMnON 10 M[M.SEPTIC TANK MAY VARY FROM ME L"Tx SHOwM.TN[CONM-OR SHALL ------------------------ -------- AND FOR THE PROPOSED ADDITION. SEunMUM°CMN^AHTMEHT- GMEM ZONE: MAINTAIN A MIN.I%SLOPE TO 1HE SCPTIC TANK. r-�'-'--- M __ ----_- m-�i{L.GL EXIST..EONUmONS/T.POCRAIRHe SURVEY BY: ---- x7kEIC QETN" WATFIr CAPACMT PROVI0E0 -IDSDz GAL MR E PERSON HAS BEEN PREPARED _ ASS .m.LUG FOR ONLY. 1UO NORM EOFORD SMEET Ml T0"'REM°N x""L'nE�il HEREaN ON pfRCApATE, OESIGHPRE' S4MPI 1E014f BRID°EWARR,MA EEL GP LO/dNG 0 - n.TN GPO/SF '""'""'`•""nJt° PLAN P eN R F R NC F.I.R.M.MAP 250001 OOODO ZONING DISTRICT:EXISTING LOT h DWELLING(RD) F,C PURAOSE Ass«°NmRo E`THE 'I �-Ep0/CR I ST°NSf.LPL IF RExMUApK swu e[Puc[D SYSTEM c Lm PIAY of VND LC 1 SCAM THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN ZONES: RESOURCE PROTECTION OVERLAY OSTRIC7 SEAM,srSrEM. F Mls DocuuEM Is n rs rt.i"t iw pBe (wcxlxa FAnIm.ME 19]LONG BGCH pOAD LG.P I""A MIN.LOT CE �BT,IS°SF. I..LOT FROMACE=10 R. THE POSSESSION Or AHY OMER GRAY RATOR QUICK OAR.CHAMBERS [m"O G1FzcwN OR 293CON LONG BE. PUN OON 12 PACE 113 Al3 700YR FLOOD EL 11 WST LOT AREA-2B.T50S SF.DUST.PROHTACE-ISO R PERSON Op ETM TWN ME PERSON NAMED GRAVEL-L[55 nElO/BCD.COXFlGUpAnOXF Ds°BURN.COMSTRUn, DN. SCALE 1"= 20 FT m P.M.P.ASSOCMR3,U.C. PLAN OOK III PAGE 1 V16 100YR.COSTAL FLOOD ZONE ,.LOT AR O SEfOACK�]0 R. �xEREOu EIS AUMORR[0 ACEHT, ACNK ARG-19.5 FT JB R�T4 D ERMCN-t53 PT. ASSEBSOR'S MAP 165 EH rxE SfAL 1 MPG.IND DESIGN PER TRANSMITTAL BETE W02110 DATED:5/Is/OB � WITH VELOCITY(WAVE ACTION)EL15 rMJiN,s r PARCEL O34 ARE REVOKED. EFRCINE mG-I.12 SF/U.22B M-1DTe.2 SF. z pun u[n c.DO ,gq,gr LAND Om GEHT.30]N NI.RGR TARO$EIH.CK- Fr. 30,49B.6 SF.x: TOTAL ARG 1075.2 s P S.sr. UIREO. Orm[D 1�x� px � •Nm•� WnM FAI �¢°N°]Ss roMmi 1NmbE PDmAxT x0u[DwxEK Hon• 11 1 R,W°Of INFILTRATOR f nRxx[xxxr[u snm W'TO MT n°YC OVICK STA"DRARD CNANBDS ,•.m:.. is1¢e m io isa J°miiiA wF°o[°"Saenr�.i'io5 m) s ncilcriliASSinio'muTui�xi°mcE.Aruin"c I3 A I aN%vR°nrc isa"in°PaD"sio i`wuiil�l Noi[: LOATa rs usE. SEPTIC SYSTEM ..14M:Ar2R Pm'w rRn °"°" [G01m[rnnN raxDl�Oi[�°"� AnuA",EUNAAI�MTTEE°M T""CE o nn Rram"TONE mM °K n[LD .r (sa xoiEs s e) DESIGN JI°VDEM'i°fWOe&GODj cxurcOLL FlLi[P ern`GiDm RC MAX.SLOPE TOR 293 LONG BEACH ROAD 1-T. CENTERVILLE, MA. A "E PREPARED m E BREA1 1-1tl __ �> nnr""S( A HRZ 3aI1RRII[[Y! - rt M (SESEPTS on°x Dr°eeuue[gsJ[L e.G BYRON @ JOYCE HASEOTES x 293 LONG BEACH ROAD RR DOxcj rut IT./rt:(Yw.) ,:� i+ �----I45•(2]t- CENTERVILLE 22R.02362 naol, E r - ) 50 PREPARED Ron"[ _ •R 3F �'n y' ,�' IN�LIRA w�n" PR[PAR[D°Y 6 n N. .. cL-T eT '9A4" s a:i.oi x Uxm 'E101cx°cws rd RDW-e R01n r P1 art.MlxwUu M.¢D�1. c Tor or 1ST LlC "Orr BROX %0 D: rm.0 S0�i'--°Rw sTKLFR r0 RDJovE A REPucE o9 D o[ra"T'i[vWEi or'"ix�°�S 1 IRE P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, ..... '"��v 1P xWo1 ¢'TOM14 SUBSOIL OR OMER nABIE 300 N0.BEOFORD ST..E.BRIDGEWATER.M4 ' qwl iS OR IMPERAIN SOIL A MINIYUN F 3 R PI°wSGSOwL-1GN OpWHDRMW[L I.JI(IPI) 308-3)R-]A21 mGO DDDy H0 NEW 2000 GAL _ _ RR T,rnsRxm ro w @ 6 ROWS OF uRRKLr IN w.olq TM s ariox0 M[ scnn As NGTED PROJECT NO:PG M m HIGH STRENGTH .T.0 DUR1N - INFILTRATOR QUICK 4 °DOTER PN°AA�"Tuw",LE.°oc E X°I'S'FP"[Rv"",o a"""°_HH.ED ar:O o.SEEn GN OF__M+II_HIGH wATFA TABLE .•TE:./ar/DT [nBID.:r/li%av ou.°Lm"C�P i°0 FAST 1.0 HIM m¢ 1.0 UKn Me°VAa Bono iu'm°n - .t t T. wv Norm wN°[J°'+"?NE rG ° ®sD:L coLox uslxO u riu ❑mIMPRR xEMoO ° 2 Mr.x j.......T)� mRSH� .G STANDARD CHAMBERS oX IS ExE4OYED, SEE ME 1U.nONGe. ° "G SRTd'siaM f'S/'O/DB(�Bomon io°TPRui' 5 SEPTIC TANK D DY THE WRmMs OF THE NEN ER PI ES FROM ME FIELD CONFIGURATION ° m y0/m uo vE aq Pic 3 ncM SYSTEM PROFILE(SEE sNECT 2) SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR INSTAWTION 0-BOX TO THE CHAMBER ROWZ AYAgY. B. E A NO aIox3 Axo nLL u TYP QUICK 4 CHAMBER SECTION r INSTRUCTIONS AND-DETAILS ALL cHANe[a Rows ARF To r WH M SOIL TOGS TD An APVRoxlwi[ RMsroN:e%i� (R[Y E fa0xr D�cK) (NOT TO SCALE) ME SAME.IXV[Ri[INAnON pEVAnON or 4.B>• OEP1H vKICS FIELD CONFIGURATION NOT TO SCALE P r,Y Exhibit A74 moWe ogee EON NOTES i x,«P�p,B/pFMlq mayn't ercee TOO Fr ISDsml fowl ins' rlifft roFASim nxr/r�el..coed TGO.I.lmll of , 1 rnl daselemow+mMmum. ahtanca,goof«mvn sm°m«,wN EE mmvmm}ebp.fmm.1MMnn^,oath to SDDaam wN 333 IW 303mj-rnmull loalory.&owe dbe bcosetl above InEGLAANl Z Ispl wll im�115oN1, m I]v«wl�on lmf�bm�ca,uun IIm AWI 34, Iboe/dpndlm °ter levall onoean to bm0]rzle•xr 5�' =1 ixl iedwsnufibe bcvlea nOoro Mva bumf ono 3 ISuu.]x26tI mnMIImL upg 'iu=}ui Lvfearxle•zl•mlxalz3.xvnl l,n a vem to lea baled above nnbh tmae nT�nerlo vold 5t x.vmnl1Owb°cvo°oan°I RmOwle'r°maie°ir.i°a .Ffa. mAmaton.Cap won vent gale /all it 9.wM.ISB.730. ml panwlxe ova.secMe MIF Oaknf dDDlt«oxs Uea ND I pen solace aea.sOcure vAmd INea deal wavnitee (ISts AWI Ilsi�w Naellale HeASIm0.911Pe OG). simal/oltHSan 1.00 gabu.l Pw Venl Iv eefted localbn aM<ov«operla MM OveN Beee Runvenl tO tleWee locanOn veal COv PBNrlp Mich vent See Noted p am»ale MlnNbafl P.lwM.SAJ w.cmlopensMlacsaeo. See Noted ys n> gqOoto w/allead9.l sy m.ISIL]w.m lopen surtace aea. SeO L 'Ins ii� SemRe MlnsldNau deal wawf.Vent gpka rlWtnoto»w ian1°"B ,E,r SeauO vrll n P O tPan pldrlg mod rolalaw x . F aRceu mohMebNdwwbpa lx®«a, D, to UGOTiaix lank pvrla MAelc,mad J.MoCCp d.."'Ces tv FAadO le.p.lank v pautL el<.I must pv,y A'[am,fon oppFcew wunuy.flvlc�o�w,ce,a�locm rwmbo0 country,dab,pvence local gvmbmB moeW90 AY�lank �y4Nevc�«covss ew.ar syaem Oye4 i'I meNncm[oaaAmeaowamn v emnpreMaedey ee merowae m b e as Rq a l""ml BechkalcorAuehael Rend ro .+o Nwxaoda me me>Iba_nwehB.See rolm117- la d. vwr.Do, M«em.dby mzemWRammlBMcnee , doner/blav'«DRAN".leonolal.i L! �ti M1q 1355cmh»edbe' me uNlam Rn Ome.I , /.TalkwMrt»mNbe Maemad by II ben"roof lOmcMs ��� ma M"Ine wq°0pl tlBN puteh C°""elvrlaryt«apP'vvvl IDp'llpb,a�q,««qv mmyo a IT33�.Wed beM'ean111B urdi me Eaw oilalk See role>AI° 5.Ilw pfivycvmpannanimoy OeOwpvN.IW. ppN"pmkeh �1q�F4r�� I a Idyfa Opprmal tmpe�bJ nv^V d.B�;M�nxm fMS Oe eneavenagpe cap«Iro s Toe pNnaryeompartmantmrnbaa paOle loot sae,�e ro»t7.ae Im p�ltl.w.f Toth e.en.l,aoealn..,ar Pipe cvPa Iwl to nr tw« II,mm,p la»e ua gpecw.mm Iso) IaPeclbN Ferro«^ me mile Yfar ISIecmlNBlw moo mevvlr Nrm Pahsee roteil.Ae 6..theme WlueN vvlroo leesMlbe Rmewmsa In° of Nownen h met Oe bemerePalNMp l�Iwo moat dle0 poled to the rop of me elwmv "moot iM tent ll clNoanp fo usO me pipe P.menme bathe NaA ).Al Mfpeclbn vle+bq mdpvmp oW parlfmN00»cone la beNbvd 7TB7 hlgha llnnlhe wN vela,Nown an me !`IpI0 «evem aweeeNm«Mwnmmee accay. . fASrfiavNO IIMsI dUil 7.MmSpeeHo vlmNn0=pump out eds vwd be seeleed fo rBm rsFl Sse roles 1 ypdYp.c°emM.N°'"°'n°°dq pap am venn oe umaB� rlgmMN 'o vide Welnm. _ Proveni accltleNala0n0 d cos FW'a F. qWm n0 e p IYvtolee aber FAST-1.1 z isle B.tekonc ears,p'pMg.<andumb MIOMg P°e aPd venh impeae«nmlc%v�{e«xMeMient. prevb alley Omen. 10.m^at pal NeInIOIM fABeuNlnral De»cAlO 9.M�Ipmg nd ancibrY equlpmenllm°Bed aherFASF0mw1 V.rM.I IIMi3i+x� enivPo-vlMnaucePRO .ine orw�qy nMe rollmpede«resMei evwoIS nt. ga Fe dvemarla^cpmV+s damp everyYmn lscml. 1 1 If.MM nelnpnl male re0ucae.[awum Ioealy0rq lelwe2e 10.NO mwe the./R11.3 m11 of Al moyh placod-etUnnw. ' ago- SnMi/SilAoamePmcemReSNr ( 14� alp U.I. dontl 4Sdeefa tlsee Neal OI4 HS FAS1e LCOwth .; v Is.Q-To thee-dwFAS1e15D-URRfmmv.-Re i niatea reeq.Relam Wfinenonmanual la ore deteAk M+eN Tail -PRO'emene seMAnnl r" 1. f le9 ,GONOTSUIE »anoled Im' OON°LSGUE I utwi wWeQ.note. Uw}wxl �rdMFs to ,I I T DGAEMIOIS I I �m.l ACelr"mMEr°XFAasI Earn r" ,ew CENIW1NCE1FR6.51 IeFe Free erFF SFIIYq n„�I ,(, IFFFFre FefFe See role3 lam Sor"ero"�n1 fOlF1UNCa See mte3 Eons "' C6 I ry1 �INAN MI N EwgInFASi IAOfFS[UrFI I,vl IfeAS GNCMI FOpldRenBlnfASl l.fq FF3r UlYl . enxw nrwma _ _ nrea'w�m�"'�'o+ � 010-MICROfi1CS021JpB�e CAK A w wP 1, SM(r �0- A I�FASSe11AN, I IOFl f. I aF}m'aa �BIOMICROBICSmxp08 5 I&allom la h5hen mA3T 1.00 Wgdawvla Trealment5 _ MrueR"Thrlum lag entenslon assembly ewer ..� pee Mg gmf ydem a See note Ee'O,1eaj."prt�'m 1.GENERAL kt,e.a roem0 The ta°hacer Nall hralhhene mdat1II NghShengWASTS,1.00 tredlment Fresh.,me1Nlathmed by BbMlaabb,Inc.The heehment sydems al be complete with o0 needed equipment ad F^vac^ flown on Ihe'alrawinBS and spetmad harem. pmnel maBtrlcNde FASIA Mtem IlvM,l xferMom.ate.bkfwa aoambN•bbwertonlmh and drmuMomalt wAl be gqoovbed by°man. mfiepHlMBtdSpRael npelhFMiOem(.�W uret dloO be slNolee vdmma 750 Galoen�pZBtt0.�MrMlum< rimentaTant os shown onma pbra.aMa1750 pal n117001 emmpodm Ntank Sugge sted admum sett➢ngz°nahliXl ine duly lbw.Tent slmWl tonronn toldcal.data.and aBxopp0cohle codek Tha to^h°tlwsnaB proNdaC albn beMreen the fAll Mlem one an suppEa Wdtl tegam to lobriwnon of ine tank mslolalb^of the FASF uNl and eellvery to IMlob alto. OTTONS Tho lHip hSheIn ONASM i.00 healment ryrydd hat be GaPable of h,,LnIq tl»Hyn dmnglh wastew°tupradu<ed py tlal radBAef prod appmPried Wade to d.,W.p and sudaln°. 3.MEDIT mass,Waste conhSng 911, wbdan[eshrorrecommendetl Ear SrealL more FASL rystem.Comullf°ctay(a propersWng Ieage. - J.MEDIA ne The FAST medlo tlwll be morndacheed of dgid PVC,PaNetnyyff poi Tg nd N ma0 be.I%W.d by he pblyethylerte Wed.The me that be Med m pa,lNan and tvntam no moving ormMFg Pats and'hal not<oao t e.the mealo sfioll De dedgnetl and lmtamd m emure In°I dwghed mlltli do9X flnw0n me ma la to me bottom of ine sepllc tons. FMe,u W 1.BLOWER to Tier eleS rglhFASi 0.9D unR short came equlppetl wiMare9erNmme type bbwa capable at deWedng'Af-IS CFM IJB-BS m3/1r7.the blower emery mpl m w with cnsae an wort f9ler meta, . 5.REMOTE MOUNTED BLOWER fie bbwa'hot bemounletl,up fo M'11 130.Smetersl rnmOmum.ham lee MBmhengltlFASi p.Vdaconhaclasupplled corlaele bate. blowamud hot' ot selmdanAng water antl lh elevollon must be n'gnalnanlhenomlallbod level.Alwopbca.reclangNa houYrlg snoE be pmvRled.mad'ectwrge ok0na lmmine blower aloe HignShenglhFA5T 5ys1em Noll be ROrided e.anSl el coeel and I.test by The coniratta. 6.ELECTRICAL The elecincal sourcemauld be wMhin 150 feet of me blower.Connll local codes fa lo,ga MMg dI1,n;a,.MWldnghluilconformlocode. Inputpower 6OH3elecMcal Erdemhll0 VAC,fingb pna,e,l.6n.,amps.InpW poweron SORE gactdcal systems 2]O VAC.BnBla phone Obl6 Kw/N.dO Fh iMee phme xl0/460VAC A 30 three phase 190/SBO VAC°»also vwBoblO. Al[ondullantlwbrlg shc4be.polledby Conan ta. 7.CONTROLS FASTO Ud _Aru rravpeq The Dan hal panel pmNdes ppoawweer tO the bbwW wmh an abml sMem combeng of°vlsuol and auNble Nann cappable of dgnaBrq blower bd3N OBue and hill watatonNMara.ine tOnhol Vent Option P.-IT epulPPetl Mlh SFR®Isequentlng Fhad Reaclorf Imletl camnN featae.A_LNE'lien[.Fulton hmWriatl. Al wak hofna0a b^onEPGo�gn cibu l9Cie H18 f»nmInFAST 7.00maB be d°nem°ttaNance vAlh me vNgen trstlmcnom pr°Ndaeby me man acUser anal m ottarda[rce with at°pp9[abk No1n a Ns Alternate Air Supply Option howl coda,and reg"Wra.Opemllom monuah Un be Ivan dwNeh wit lFdude°dasMpnon of lmt°B°naM1 operoto and sydem m°rote Ce pmCedures. I. IS1B�m,ae.M�on tome FASlnuAley pAZMB Masaewsan wNaaa of ltw by anewonH l«we o« 9.FLOWANDOOSING 1c�mllp .bNCppttN5etrot tM,aeel la aelon ale dmtWwonl Aaivm plea b,pmelkl/C FAST sydemt hove been successfuN dedgned.fedetl and<edlfietlreteMrp glaNN.demandbvsed Influent floW,When thAvenl now b conthele by pump a other mevm to help w9h NghN INSlsI:�1$'�'�^,'bB eearein lenpm of tl iFr lm]e1.F«ne,a Beplemen le'I�71 vabbb Roweondeiom.men muHiple dovlq everts RMub be used to nelp.more even fie- fmd°""eCSbe lo°'°""•"«vl' '""«yT«°a°"mglePb°SOM'u RU' a°"°Itc�E l vAontcn�«tM by W«olo ant• Ilomvwdn n«an«•ro 4rlgeamhn«.+bore m«mep BbAU_wcf' c.W_Fb,aA new lBghthen9mFA5fOmodeb lHeg tthenI11r IA.I3.J.0,15.antl 9Al GEg!tdalach mmaledaband omidp rota Pedae one 1p year otter 1.bemenNnmm lvntvaNnn bF IDSertMmnbboo MaNanbmee. - A� UWalalbn«e nleen lB monies ham dale of sNpmenl vdli< o[ Frsl, ell lO the'/o Tema and eonasom: 5.1M rtw ewrAaeemnw M»cvetln proven)dvmope�wnpipe davlbe Sae el kt I I +wi Ibwtre InpnApeimMmu ewwt,B �Obw�.A 1F41 DannpmewvPenh pedoa.xany panhaemaha«tore fopMam os speanea wnen aPeranrrgg NaedgIt<andmom,andrcme egwpmem nth ImtaBeeane is beks�operaed one d.me,i Rw ore m.fASmMm mMb.,.a,eew veM vpalbnk,m,cea.,mope.me at npwr wmr x«,te.apo,arlmFAnl.e r HIGH STRENGTH molnlalnaethatcordanta vAlh ine wm^an lnsimalba,proNtleeb BbM1a0bIo.Inc.eb Micnbks.lne.wW re Yare lace Us Itsa Grenon su de(eclNe Msfree ofc un.ea Mlna mecvmma demo.veY 1. cwcel Y Pa P 0 ape.DalaelNe parts 7,laa.«rllvf.plpbgrnledlblver.Ip,dla poewgveNfen«..boor bFpme,E m FAST 1.D l be rcnnnea byy to elo-Auamolc.mG.s taaan podsp Its rewa,lea.Fne cod Nleborana as aloe mBsemal rasullMg irwn btertwN of me aefecTNe pan wa ham A .... SEPTIC SYSTEM Ilatalmbn Olean brtddSetl lmtlafhb wa^anty one regular mNnlenance Items mcn as in a bWssnaE be home by me miner.ihh w°rto^ d sn teavxgenerpl sydam mllWe.°er°lot a p a�w BIO+.UCROBICt01(pB .,,,m ^eelmoene . ponenb whknhwebaon al byanooeme«am/c mporNnisma,owe boon dhossamWeal by unaulhal3ed pe ns.lmpmpady Bed OR do to Nlereeorlmprepm , ate. ., w .pa `" ..� DESIGN DETAILS Moor a Moore Bmlacllo^.lhn wmanm� ppFm aNy I°OSe hamment dent aM doer not mtluaa am of me noble wNnIt OR calm erNnog,apnc lank arwpp ea,.elwAlaoma.b.bretenetfna,bntlo revise.mange«moat ma BIO-MICROBICS, INC. SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE PSa me cla 6.021 SAC POT1aRma ommiG an�ne9_aeslgn of tt»FAAfyd ^r<pmp ipM apah mmeoEvnmoW mtamng am obBBaom7 to consmurnex pR:aR YASRe ARR REavBIRD: 293 LONG BEACH ROAD oke inch cnenges arrrodlAcNbmmpre"I""' enf equll.elo.NSkmbks,Inc.hnot mspomlble facomequennal or mckental DD NO SCAtE FOR THE DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF THE HIGH STRENGTH AssoaAres,uc. N oARD Dr xulr" CENTERVILLE, MA. deEveges atom value ravlting ham mcn romps a,.but not lhnned to.delectm dodge.mafenol,aMaNrlamhb•or delaylln FAST 1.0 TREATMENT SYSTEM AND SHALL BE FULLY po'e[xoa:Einiu oessnvz Txo 1piniMlr Ez<pvsnEUEx ry.re IOc0men15 ar le Ilk UNSFSS OTED I AND P[PPP[a OR p P° 01BE M NS r I RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION, START-UP, SEE SPfCl1AGIO N 11 FOR SUBMISSION R[OUIPEMENiS.' 1Ng WARRANTY IS IN UEUOFALL OTHER WARRAMIES F%PRFSS ORIMPDED.BIOMICROBICS SPECIFlGLLY OgCWMt ANYIMPUED ARE INI CNFS MAINTENANCE, INCLUDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ae1[Rv[ BYRON CSRJOYCEr HASEOTES WARRANTY OFMERCHAMABINY OR RTNESS FOR APAB'CUURPURPOSE. JtC MR51 -I.F Fetus s DE APPROVAL(TRANSMITTAL#W072368). P.I.P. ciriwrAic or Mc cicivnnoHn�Hli 6toxf puG[M[w. 293 LONG BEACH ROAD NOREPR6EMAME OR PERSONaAIfmORBEDTO GIVE ANYOMER WARRANTY OR IO ASSUME FOR BIOMICROBICS.WC, (OIERA CU - A [ x aaARo o7 xu*rN CENTERVILLE,MA. 02362 ANY OTHER OABIUIY IN CONNECRON WIIN iHESME OFIR PRODUCTS.Conlad your local tlhmbutala path antl sarvlee. O.Ox1 N HlghShengmFMT1.O0FMTUnNT a !'joe[xoTlp[o'wwEx ix[zTsi[u • [[x INSTALLED 500-73]-2267 130'a5 AS/CMI pgSaA!0 e�Pox[Ni"AS PBUIIi suRV[Yr ENO p PIPMO/ pq[pARED BT eernrvwroxeomwrle w.ewRwvnasaErvortRnorFo+wcFakunc.unlnmo wPurwuA A f45FAST®.I,WSpecifleatbns LOCAL SALES REPRESENTATIVE _ pox. gnAREra P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC Be SHEET JOHN ROLAND _ x00 NO.BEOFORO ST..E.BRIDGEWATER,MA .nee"wairt..tiFgo«'lrs �rw['d1°elm°oa�cn umosMA"YB1"0iwa""awmeErewnl°FAwm-ildsie� BIO-MICROBICS 02008 JOF.1 508-771-5570 OR tyro poeosrio As ssllr is q[oulq ED ar ixc iEo�gi sae-s]e-ldxl 508-823-9566 puux P1 Is Az eEu IS POP cuuvwwcemMiili usE. x so ] eR°IyAR A�Io pimEUEx E o PRESENT , l3�i i%va R[vrsmx ai%zj°e° FOR pTIIN OR E1NETtaxPSCrlONior NS waRRIC SURFACE [sv axsNluri[s s-3 1 09;;25/2009 11:27 508-771-8079 NUTTER MCCLENNEN FIH PAGE 01/10 Nutter FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL. SHEET J'oday's Date: September 25, 2009 'Time: ��= ��p Employee 1D: # of Pages: I rem: Lli.za Cox Direct Dial: 508-79U-5431 Fax No: 508-771-8U79 RL"CIPi1 N'I' COMPANY TAX NO. PHOML No. Tom Perry, Building Commissioner d 'Town of Barnstable 508-790-6230 508-862-4038 'l'om McKean, Director, Barnstable Board of Health 508-790-6304. 508-862-4644 COMMENTS : Re: Ffaseote I;eaeh Road, Centerville 1.'lease see the attached deed restrictions with recording information on same allowing for the issuance of the building; permit for the property located at 293 Long Beach Road, Centerville. Thank you 'for your assistance. JJ;m Cox STATEMENT OF(;ONFIDENTIAI.I'IT The documents included with this laesimile tntnsmittal sheet contain information from the law firm of Nutter McClennen&Fish I-LP which is confidential and/m privileged. The information is intended to be for die use of the addressee named on this transmittal sheet, If you arc not the addressee, note that any disclosure. photocopyinfi, distribution or use of the contents of Chia faxed information is prohibited. If you have.received this facsimile in error,please notify us by telephone (collect)immediately so that we can arrange for the retrieval of the original dOcumCntc at no Cost to you. iF TTITiRE IS A PROBLEM WI'1'I-i T141S TRANSMISSION, OR IV YOU DID NOT RECi:IVE ALL. PAGES, PLEASE CALL 508-790-5400, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, FOR NUTTER MCCLENNEN & FISH LLP USE ONLY Client-Matter No. 1.08719-1 Nutter McClennen&Fish LLP ■ Attomeys at Law 1471 lyannough Road, P.O. Box 1630 ■ Hyannis,MA 02601-1630 . 508-790-5400 ■ Fax: 508-771-8079 ■ www.nutter.com 0925/2009 11:27 508-771-8079 NUTTER MCCLENNEN FIH PAGE 10/10 12 T. ��O '� :'I. 1, .._.... '• .::�-:-.a-a� `���t`�s� iia.�,'�� Y ,•. fig z `•'�''''I,r:'I.II I I ��0 _MI.' L C D® ' z r e l r' S t C c 5 � p P 9 a eloll •p�r'l1l!rR i"� � ;,'� t /V ,k 09/,25/2009 11:27 508-771-8079 NUTTER MCCLENNEN FIH PAGE 09/10 lot a r.2 rn .A f V wlf ..r "Lvi � IL .!II iR �'•':yr -���..' ,f'i 'I if 'fr,ipr.:};.%' .�{5�a.11e! II' 'll� ',�• ! �1' 'L.i!F.: .. Ir Rig NI IF - lip, QIN 111 PERMrr SET: CA I P.H. tic 09/,25/2009 11: 27 508-771-8079 NUTTER MCCLENNEN FIH PAGE 08/10 Exhibit A [INSERT EXPANSION PLANS] 1842248.5 09,25/2009 11:27 508-771-8079 NUTTER MCCLENNEN FIH PAGE 07/10 Executed as a seal,instrument this &�Nday of &&—MIeP009. J c rEjTaseoies � COMMONWEALTT-I OF MASSACHUSETTS rnl�.�eSPX �� 2009 jjH88� ss. OR this +"day of� 2009, before me, the undersigned.notary public, personally appeared Joyce E. Flaseotes, )roved to the through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was j K.rNbc o , to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. IN AAr+ Notary Public My Commission expires: kill l l II I(I Nj1, N�c�j�!�i� %. .Of r111111111�\ 09/25/2009 11:27 508-771-8079 NUTTER MCCLENNEN FIH PAGE 06/10 Property. The Grantor agrees that there shall be no further expansions, additions or changes to the bulls of the structure on the Property except in accordance with the Plan. 3. The Grantor agrees that the Property sliall be used for single family residential use only. Accessory uses to the single family dwelling, including accessory apartments and accessory home occupational use of the Property, shall be prohibited 4. The Grantor shall allow the Cape Cod Commission tb,e ability to unilaterally re- record these restrictions with the Barnstable County Registry District of the Land Court prior to the thirty (30) year expiration of said restrictions_ For Grantor's title, see Certificate of Title No. 58363. Byron Haseotes died on May 25, 2009. [SIGNATURE ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 09125/2009 11:27 508-771-8079 NUTTER MCCLENNEN FIH PAGE 05110 Doa'-1 s 124 P 373 091--25-200? 11 =00 BARNSTABLE LAND COURT REGISTRY RESTRICTION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Joyce E. Haseotes (the "Grantor") is the owner of the property known as and.numbered 293 Long Beach Road, Centerville, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, as is more particularly described in Certificate of Title No. 5 83 63 fled with.the Barnstable County Registry District of the,Land.Court(the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to constrict an addition to the single fam.i.ly dwelling on the Property; WJTEREAS, on July 23, 2009, the Cape Cod Commission issued a decision approving the Grantor's application for. a Hardship Exemption from.the Craigyil.le Beach District of Critical Planning Concern, pursuant to Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act„ c. 716 of. the Acts of 1989, as amended(the "Decision"); and WIdEREAS, pursuant to General Condition 5 of.the Decision,the Grantor has agreed with.the Town of.Barnstable, a Massachusetts municipality having a mailing address of 367 Main Street, Hyannis, Massachusetts 02630 to place a number of restrictions on the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, the Grantor does hereby place the following restrictions on the Property in accordance with her agreement with the Town of Barnstable,which restrictions shall run with the land and be binding upon all successors in title: 1. The Grantor shall maintain a view corridor on the Property as follows: No structures shall be maintained within thirty (30) feet of the westerly lot line of the Property (the"Setback'). Further, this Setback shall remain free of view obstructing site improvements and landscaping other. than low growing plant material or existing natural vegetation. 2. The currently existing single family dwelling on the Property and the proposed additions, as shown on,the plans entitled."Additions and Renovations for The Haseotes Family,"dated August 4, 2009 and,prepared by ERT Architects, Inc. (the "Plan"), attached hereto as Exhibit A, shall constitute the full build-out of. the 09/25/2009 11:27 508-771-8079 NUTTER MCCLENNEN FIH PAGE 04/10 Executed as a seal*instrument this hday of , 009. J ce . Haseotes COMMONWEALTH OF MA.SSACHUSETTS 1R`N �C e tet [O_ , 2009 I i*.table, ss. — On this���h _day of , 2009, before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared Joyce E. Haseotes, proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification,which was 4- Ch.Or.S)I(\ --, to be the person whose name is signed on.the preceding or attached document, and.acknowledged to me that she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. Notary Public expires: � My Commission p ���11111111111// A.S 1842033.5QP o��e ie� �,FJ� ao us yy .sA p � o � i �/if 1�111111\ a 09125/2009 11:27 508-771-8079 NUTTER MCCLENNEN FIH PAGE 03/10 D0Ce1l124T372 09--25-200$ 11200 BARNSTABLE LAND COURT REGISTRY DEED RESTRICTION WHEREAS, Joyce E. 1laseotes (the "Grantor") is the owner of the property known as and.numbered.293 Long Beach Road, Centerville,Barnstable County, Massachusetts, as is more particularly described in.Certificate of Title No. 58363fi.led with the Barnstable County Registry District of: the Land Court(the `%Property"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to construct an addition to the single family dwelling on the Property and to ui.stall a Hi.ghStrengthFAST 1..00 Wastewater Treatment System on the Property in compliance with 310 CMR 15.000, State Environmental Code, Title V, Minimum Requirements for the Subsurface Disposal of Sanitary Sewage; WHEREAS, on.July 23, 2009, the Cape Cod Commission issued a decision approving the Grantor's application for a Hardship Exemption from the Craigville Beach District of. Critical Planning Concern., pursuant to Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act, c. 71.6 of the Acts of 1989, as amended(the "Decision"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to General Condition 5 of the Decision, the Grantor has agreed with the Town.of Barnstable, a.Massachusetts municipality.having a mailing address of 367 Main Street, Hyannis, Massachusetts 02630 (the"Town") to a restriction,as to the number of bedrooms which can be included in any home built on the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, the Grantor does hereby place the following restriction on the Property in accordance with her agreement with the Town, which restriction shall run.with the land and be binding upon all successors in title: 1. Any house or structure constructed on the Property sball.be limited to a maximum of. six(6) bedrooms 2. The Grantor shall allow the Cape Cod Commission the ability to unilaterally re- record these restrictions with the Barnstable County Registry District of the Land Court prior to the thirty (30) year expiration of said restrictions. For Grantor's title, see Certificate of Title No. 58363. Byron Haseotes died on May 25, 2009. 09/25/2009 11:27 508-771-8079 NUTTER MCCLENNEN FIH PAGE 02/10 (INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE) vLtJr s t t rcc## ti.r� �.� w•r� a i —...+ STANDARD CERTIFICATE OrOEATN BARN TAB ILAND COU T REGISTRY FOR USE Or REGISTRY OF VITAL RECORDS AND STATtsTlcs gE01Sn:REo NUMBER ATE USE ONLY PHYSICIANS,AND lug LAST Sex DATE OF DEATH(No.,Day,y(J MEDICAL EXAMINERS Of D£CfDRNT•NAME FIRST MIDDLE STATE USE. , 3Xalel 20U HOSPITAL OR OTHER ONLY PLACE OF DENY H(Clf}/f COUNT/OF DEATH Iru'TTUTION•NAmn pl aal Ine l r,of•e en.+t Aee Amber) .A h e Ae a Cod t l PLACE OF DEATH(GAAlk ony one): T w0.9 DE lNT OF FS6PANIC DRIGIN7 RACE(e.p.WM,n,&olSc Am!daAn IndlAn,elo.) OFCEDENr6 EDUCATION(Hlpnesl Gmda CompkMeJ 6 Typea e ofyyAl SQa level"e RI.,DbmW&Qft,CUban,Aft) (SPRE M ElnmAftwrY Sac La_-19 Can n �a 0 `s ad Re --White B 12 AGE•LAM 011111dnY N ER UNDL• Providence Rhode Island 10 MARRIED,NCV..R MARRIED L4,gT SPOUBE(If A&j71W"AI&A nnmo) us OCCUPATION KIND OF SUSINCSS OR INDUSTRY WIDOWED OR DIVORCED (PINY If RnNred) 10 Age +2 -Ma -rie ,,. Joyce E. Geor a 114a elland Eamp_ RESIDENCE-NO.A ST_ClrrrTOWK COUNTY,STATFJCOUNTRY nP coor. yen 293__Long Beach _ mad Bar table Barr►,stable Massachusetts FnTHFR—FULL NAMt[ BTATE Of BIRTH(n not M US. MOTHER•NAME (GIVII (MAIDEN) STATE,OF BIRTH Ql nol M The US, 16 Reald name wunfryJ name country) ,d p 1d A e Baseis IB Greece INFORMANTS NAMr: MAIUNA ADORNS-NO,AST„CITY(TOWN,STATE,21P CODE R-LATIONSHIP It 00-SMIA a 02632 20 ce Ha a to + m 23 METHOO OF IMMEDIATE DISPOSITION FUNL14AL RERVICE LIOtN$EF,OR TF{ERR DE'utUNLL^ LICENSE a AURIAL ❑CREMATION 23 Dlsp P_IHTOMBMENT ❑REMOVAL FROM STATE Alam H. Edwards 09 50263 DONATION OT14 S -C. e -• r PLACE OF DISPORRION(Name of GAMAT4ry,Cremnlery OradterJ LOCATION(p'?ewn S14fe) ". Beechwood Cemeter. Zoe F 21.32 Avt40 DATEOF DISPOSrrrON NAME ANO ADORQSS OF FACILITY OR OTMFFl DESIGNEE R7A„Dny,yr. 28ND e St. , Hyannis. M& 0260 20 PART I-CntAr thn dhoenao,InIudaA,ar enmplteollans Ihnl W0804 Inn dnnlh.Da not vee Only thn reoda of dying,ouch ee wrdlne or m4plmloy Arml,nhomc or haoR failure ApprulfrAlr Intarvrl 3H MMner Lkl only Ono enuan on each Ilno(A d)yduph d)PRINT OR TYPE LEGIBLY. Between OnIIM And DAIIIn IMMEDIATE CAUSC(n"l r tpeAAmA or eond4lon revuhlnD A. PXje= In dAAth) Yp OIIF TO PR A-A LON:NUCNC8009 ~' ELcuenth1lly IIAt condlllono.II h, 350 Wetk In( any,kadlna to Imrnndlnln CUE TO TOR 0 A COWeCIAOXE OM CAUSE Enter fire of total c, MlRnfad avenu mronhg h we ro BRAS,A coNvn ewe OF) 381 Place d4anr)LAST n PART II•Other adnllloont MrAllam Oanhlbullnp to death bid not fnrullinp In undarylnp wUnA glvnn In Pan L WAS AUTOPSY WERE AUTOPSY FINDINGS PERFORMED? AVAILABLE PRIOR TO TT CAM OF or NA) COMPLETION of CAUGE OF DEATHI(YAAorNo) 3o Un13 Cancer.rQTonae 'S ease, Diabetes 3, 32 �- dda Plan EX)11a M NNE OE�.,pp_ATH U Tli OF INJURY TIME OF INJURY I UnY AT WORK NOTIPED1 NATURAL UMOMICIDCGICOVLDNOTHEDLTERMINSO (A40.Ddy,Yr.) (Ye:erNO) (yo2 or Not Yp9 _ ACCIDENT 0SUICIDE (_IPENOINRINVESTIGATION AA insu 30 Prohouneement of Death mjcRIOE HOW INJURY OCCURRED (PLACE Oee:LWJ�(,41 �p LOCATION(No.A SL,Wry/loka,:016) Form(R-302)on File:❑ ale..)Spud& 35d 36a 3SI 300 7o the b4t1 0l my knewlnd o Qpin�_0ovtmnd Al the Ilme,darn,Ma pineo one due to IhA 37A On IM Oallo or otmminalton andfor nrvad ntlen In ey apinlon deoA oII of 01rt Omo. a, wucNe)elollM, rT� F. e One pnm and evA to the wwa(e)stated..1 �— (Slpnnlum •]ll�l H . (3(Onnwle A e RA SI a'J ATC SIGNED(Mo.,Deyly. HOUR OF DEATH L• � DATE SIGNED(M4..Day,Yr.) HOUR OF DEATH Co 10g %lb /'I 1.1 ��( ��c 9 See M 37e 370 M AI NAME OF ATTENDING PHYSICIAN IF NOT CEnTTFIER a PRONOUNCED DEAD(Ma.,Day,Ye) PRONOUNCED DEAD(HrJ e 10 30d Dr. a,].yn I�IaC g� 'e ~� 37d '1 A M NAME AND ADDRESS OF CERT1!•'YI t3 PHYSICIAN OR MEDICAL EXAMINUR(1W o PM) /C }A, 6 LICENSE O.OF CRATIFIEn SR .��Al2)' I� 14ASCHEfne-k vZ? 4APJ/` ..?�f "` WAS,TH' E A IF YES,DATE IF YEB,TIME Add NAME OF PRONOUNCER TIYLL PERMANENT PRONOUNCEMENrr•ORM?PRONOUNCED PnONOUNCED BLACK INK ONLY (YIN 01 NO) ❑R.N.❑P.A.(]N.P. 404 140- LjHF E BIJRI PERMIT ED nECEIVED IN E C9TY' WN F DATE OF R OROn R-301.08 �,r�a 4 1'I ESI � SR3 1 rA /'�"r� � I A C�.>=�0 .200 I,theundcrsigned.hereby certi fy that I am the Town Clerk for the Town of Barnstable that,as such,I have custody of the records of births,marriages and deaths,required by law to be kept in my office;and I do hereby certify that the above is a true copy from said records. WITNESS:My hand and the SEAL OF THE TOWN OF BARf+lSTABLE /,I A TRUE COPY ATTEST:at Barnstable,Massachusetts CG` / Linda Hutchenrider,Town Clerk,Barttstable (If the Scal is not raised,this document has been illegally copied-do not accept it) TOWN OF BARNSTABLE LOCATION z93 I LM &AG11 0. SEWAGE#-2 00 9 Z/ VILLAGE CrQ7rdz.uiLJ_Z ASSESSOR'S pM-A_P&PARCEL '�3 INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. P 'S l' cAyKTI byQ. SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY 2-OZrO qI F-I►C� �iyST, (I ..b� LEACHING FACILITY: (type) 14..S x 35 (size) 1 to F 1 L"MAT-OW NO.OF BEDROOMS n ro►n,%� ' OWNER -T GS U. ce fA^h PERMIT DATE: 9" 3c) C79 COMPLIANCE DATE: I 1 I Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table to the Bottom of Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility(If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of le ility) -- ll Feet FURNISHED B 9AISIOV66 h - ®�C d k 1 C�.o21alW) Town of Barnstable P# / (a 7J Department of Regulatory Services Public MAS& Health Division y t639• 200 Main Street,H anuis MA 02601 Date �. lEDtA Date Scheduled . Time Fee Pd. . . . .. >: , , . •, . , ., , Fes.. . . �'. Soil.Suitability Assessment for Sewage D' g asposal Performed.By.PA72 Lck ! . '649RAIZ4 k Witnessed By: OorvA Lp /Z. 0,CrMi92 q g f, P LOCATION& GENERAL FORMATION E . ;�9_3 �c�n� �4Ch R� . or 1 Owner's Name 1?)y �,G� i 00_v �erv( l6 M �. �OSe0�f5 Address ag �o"S I.. I S 5' U C e }�; u i(' yvL/� �� / . Engineer's Name TION V REPAIR p � A 55 0G LG+,o S LJ y Telephone# SLR g 37 5 3 Land Use EyYiJ•r.TivS ^_ =C1 L2ni S. Slopes(%j O".r Suiface Stones FIL"It AX r WA1,6.( ��. Distances'from: "Open Water Body � `7%O D ` } ff` 'Po'ssible Wet Area - OO �_ft Drinking Water Well Drainage Way ft property Line i2-s'O �� —�_fit Other ft SKETCH:is tree[name,dimensions of lot,exact locations of test holes&pert tests,locate wetlands�nProximity x to holes) I I I Z 06: S � p r : S •� GJ _ ,� Jlr o Pa rent material(geologic) .Drpod2'rS ,. r, Depth fq Bedrock Depth to Groundwater.:Standing Water in Hole: `-T rr Ijo,/4 Z .�y 'Weeping from Pit Rpce Estimated Seasonal High groundwater 60 rr morrcV Tiv TP Z,. • x DETERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER � Method Used: OQJE�t.vEO Mtrf��Ef Depth Observed standing in obs.hole: Depth to weeping from side of obs.hole: tn, Depth to soil mn[tles: ul0 T ;Z -, m Index Well# Readin Date. �-�•in. Groundwater Adjustment -- g Index Well level+ Adi,thctor AdJ.1Irouttdwater1evel Ee ° PERCOLATION TESL' Date .7�Z1/o7 xtmel/O'oaTP 1 Tp 3 TimeAt9" (00 c 2 y'.--Z rrJo"`/ /' i QTime at 6"k Time @ 9'fp /O:O z N '---—W~ Time(9"-6")ij /O;!7 Q6 rT✓ rfJfJ: 2LGD vL-p .vor 01/04VTIOX4 h �Zmto Site Suitability Assessment: Site Passed Site Failed: Additional Testing Needed(Y/N) .�✓ Original: Public Health Division Observation Hole Data To,Be Completed on Back----------- ***If percolation test is to be conducted within 100'of wetland,you must first notify the Barnstable Conservatiori'Division at least one(1) week,Prior to beginning. Q:ISEPTICIPERCFORM.DOC DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. n istenc % ravel a ve- Fi�AOcF p-9 A& SA.ti6y6OAM /QXa1-/z A10,VE LAWI: /Coors. . . FitsAOcF, MatozvM q�l7+ ,Q,,, JAwcyLOAM /OX/L ivoNE XX P60diX ;►MvrL• G/Is f r"FrrrEo FZ.vf fo /7-&r�• fl J'ANO 2.Ir, FNt/QA.tw q4"I fA",covJE o< Z ty`y/ 49A4.4 a'CAO SC,v • � .t,s�ir�Sr c,4rF.�.f a�LX c,OvEo rrv. DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# 2- Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. Consistency,%Gravel) ,j4AV t/fiay Fitt.4paE O_ r, AP y Lw4M /oyn -A VQAIE , cA ,v t• 007-r ' .ttA 9zE,MJPO ZuM -/'/^ ` Qh, SA,1oyL.v,4M /Oy/t 1j/.1' iVvNE. J-7, PEOOe-E. A,�o"y,.060 ,wcrr{ go" VA,vo Jrapfr-Ofed Fs"f/m ZL-�®"' �� IrANJ Z.sy'/Y of cryy/ CvA^Jlr d•A,vO Goo fF,drA4'Cf f'AArA01 c�c o„Fc cy LA ."F,u. I f DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# 3 Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other _ Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. I - Consistengy. o Grave VG-,y AtfA04E A ,,... Lo6voy4oAr4 /�yn.z/2 *VONE (.o,~ /Coors. F,tf,OdLL�,MEOzvM L}r/(> �'I*. Qw. � J'AtiodL�AM lOy/Ly/�s wOwC J'� PFBQGE ' /67 J'p u G t 'SA--VO 2:S'r �, QAlE c-Aa„rf r'A,•'O GOofE, J'?,vtcE'tsoswr DEEP-OBSERVATION DOLE LOG - Hole# Depth from Soil Soil Texture Soil Color *Soil Other .) - ' (USDA) � - (Munsell)— Mottling (Structure,Stones:Boulders. Surface(in • _ � . Consi en '., .- y '• tppdo3L�JAivc FtL t. i FrcrAOcF' Ov,•-'Tll Ab SANo•YLoAM /OY/bz'/Z. J1/0N,E "' ,4,tp-lZv,r F,trAOLE,A14corl^, 33-Yo.":. av fA�-oyLvAM <oY/ty/6 d'?., ~674ir. 77,",rirreto FrA a fo yQ-IOZN J"A'Alo.^ 2 jy7�y /NONE CvA,aJd� J,ONO LoodF.•f&wff- �it.Ot/V Flood Insurance Rate Man: Z s'o O o / 0008 0 Above 500 year•flood boundary No.-' Yes t Within 500 year boundary No= Yes x ZOA/Z A=/3 E'C. ♦! Within 100 year boundary No_,._. Yes.� I Depth of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist:.in all areas observed throughout the area proposed forahe.soil absorption system? •f'�J -- If not,what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material7' ,�. - Certification VA�g 8 I certify that on (date)I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required training,expertise and exp rience described in 3 10 CMR 15.017. Signature Date �/Z8107 i Q:\S•EPTICVERCFORM.DOC � 4 CONC. BND(FND) ��• IRON PIPE(FND)---'" EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROJECT BENCHMARK g APPROXIMATE LOT LINE EXISTING P Z NAIL SET IN U �� SEE PLAN REFERENCEBEACHROAD DRIVEWAY EL.=7.34 �qy �p s;> NoJ " N : �(N. .V.D. DATUM � :.� ::::: EXISTING . . CO EDGE OFPAV PAVEMENT DRIVEWAY 0 0 " Up " c S� 7 33 55 E coROAD Up32c0-� 150.10 S 77'33 55 W 1 o I No SITE v 0 I K . s Q 1 v C I rn 19.5 x38 �1P IRON PIPES(FND) I /NFL TRATOR QUICK 4 I I LEACHING FIELD \ / I •,';t I VEN a T 1 ` U; Z; POLY INSP. \ i � A BARR/ER PORT 2 I ~ ' LOCUS M A P Y ; U s TABLE OF AS-BUILT TABLE OF AS-BUILT D-Box SYSTEM ELEVATIONS SYSTEM LOCATION TIES , 1o"FOUNDATION \�. N LOCATION AS-BUILT PLAN LOCATION A B C D INSP. WALL ��EXISTWG �� '� CENTER OF I PORT 1 T.O.F.=9.64 .GARAGE` \� AT NEW 6.63 6.5t • SLAB=6.7t�� SEPTIC TANK 56.80' 45.20' ti •C • •D ��\��� w+i FOUNDATION INLET END o � �� Ln N 2" FMS AT CO 2 6.33' 8.5' ����� 2"x4" 9.23 8.94 CENTER OF Q; I .0 16.48 � M COUPLING SEPTIC TANK 47.90 33.20 ^� ti II � " "'OUTLET END -� ° oo 4"0 SCH 40 0 o co f �, w v► STUB FOR 9.16 DISTRIBUTION I' :N 2"FMs -� / ADDITION ti BOX 31 .65 27.40 2000 GAL. . • / mo 2-COMPARTMENT / / PORCH BASEMENT SEPTIC TANK r� FAST TANK 2"x4" o / // / EL,=3.04t INLET INVERT 8.98 8.59 INSPECTION COUPLING � / #293 PORT 1 53.00 47.45 1 4"1+� SCH 40 N / / / ' / w I / EXISTING DWELLING. / z STUB FOR / / / ' w SEPTIC TANK ADDITION F.F.=io.74t� OUTLET INVERT 8.73 8.34 INSPECTION / SLAB// / / a - 48.20 50.80 /T.O.F.=s.72t w PORT 2 NO BASEMENT , �• D BOX / \�� " INLET INVERT 8.23 8.03 END OF 10"0 P.T. SLAB=8.67t U ' WOOD PILE • // / / j / \SLAB y D-BOX 69.50 64.70 (TYP:) �� OUTLET INVERTS CHAMBER ti 8.08 7.86 , ROW 1 r • / END OF _ \` _ - -_ // SUN ROOM / " . . . BER OF , I\DE�CK CRAM 7.95 7.77 CROWMV66R 6�5.70') 68.50' " a /F.F =9.11 t ;;- , INLET INVERTS BOTTOM OF GRADE 21 .50' 25.75' -- -J -- -- -- CHAMBER ROWS 7.28 7.10 CLEANOUT 1 ti ' N 3' RIGHT I GRADE OF WAY v, EXIST. EROSION ;. TOP OF g,40 8.35 7.15' 24.10 CLEANOUT 2 ' o CONTROL;BARRIER , POLY BARRIER ( a 9 W ' EXISTING STONE RETAINING WALL ;` NOTE: THIS PLAN REPRESENTS A PROGRESS AS-BUILT SHOWING THE INSTALLATION I OF THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS. PLAN REFERENCE " ONCE THE FAST SYSTEM IS INSTALLED "SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN FOR 293 LONG BEACH ROAD l 15' -' COSTAIL OF BANK --15' (SPRING 2010) A FINAL TOPOGRAPHIC CENTERVILLE, MA. ` AS-BUILT WILL BE PREPARED. PREPARED BY: P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC. j DATED: APRIL 27, 2007 OWNER: REVISED: JUNE 2, 2009 0 FINAL REVISIONS PER BOARD OF HEALTH JOYCE HASEOTES AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION APPROVAL ZONING SET- 293 LONG BEACH ROAD COMMENTS DATED: SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 BACK LINE(TYP.) CENTERVILLE, MA. 02362 ZONE A13 I GRAPHIC SCALE ZONE VI SEPTIC SYSTEM 20 0 10 20 40 80 PIPING AS-BUILT PLAN 6" mom FOR ( IN FEET ) 293 LONG BEACH ROAD l inch = 20ft. APPROX. MEAN HIGH WATER CENTERVILLE, MA. -- - - - - - -. PREPARED FOR JOYCE HASEOTES OCEAN LEVEL AT 12:15pm ON 3/30/07 293 LONG BEACH ROAD THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR CENTERVILLE, MA. 02362 THE PERSON NAMED HEREON ONLY. 508-737-2267 OF MA THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED FOR THE MICHAEL s9� SPECIFIC PURPOSE ASSOCIATED WITH THE PREPARED BY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,.,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ yN SEPTIC SYSTEM AS-BUILT ONLY. IF THIS - '� - " " - " " ' "- - - '- s -'APPROX. MEAN LOW WATER P.M.P. ASSOCIATES LLC o PE °` r "' DOCUMENT IS IN THE POSSESSION OF ANY APP 200 N0. BEDFORD ST. E. BRIDGEWATER, MA 4�Y '399 OTHER PERSON OTHER THAN THE PERSON 508-378-3421 F NAMED HEREON OR THEIR AUTHORIZED WWW.PMPASSOC.COM AGENT, THEN THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE ARE REVOKED. SCALE: 1"=20' PROJECT NO: P007.00 DATE: 12-16-09 REVISION: IRON PIPE(FND)----� CONC. BND(FND) �. EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROJECT BENCHMARK Z APPROXIMATE LOT LINE NAIL SET IN U SEE PLAN REFERENCE LONG B E A ROAD EXISTING P , J DRIVEWAY EL.=7.34 eqy �o N.G.V.D. DATUM �4 i N N EXISTING PAVEMENT ao F PA ED GE 0 O " - 0 DRIVEWAY 0 up " N 77'33'55" E -' � MP\� `\v�� • ggACN ROAD 150.10' Up32� 150.01' I I S 7T33'55„ W r ; 50�•(N \,\<� R ONG I I SITE o�No Q , ` , I N c rn 19.5 x38 NP IRON PIPES FND ( ) /N /F L TRATOR DICK �r I Q 4 I �- LEACHING FIELD \ l I z S _ VENT / Ui POLY INSP. w J �Q ` BARRIER PORT 2 \ \ / : - I Y LOCUS MAP It TABLE OF AS-BUILT TABLE OF AS-BUILT SYSTEM ELEVATIONS SYSTEM LOCATION TIES I , 1o"FOUNDATION \\\ N LOCATION AS-BUILT PLAN LOCATION A B C D INSP. WALL \EXISTING �� Li : 2" FMS PORT I T.O.F.=9.64 \'.GARAGE`\� AT NEW 6.63 6.5t CENTER OF , , • •D SLAB=6.7t� w FOUNDATION SEPTIC INLET TANK 56.80 45.20 .H C ;�,N 2" FMS AT • co z 8.5, \\ X\\ o N 2„x4„ 9.23 8.94 . , 6.33 i \ M7 COUPLING SEPTIC TANK 47.90' 33.20' °j • • • 16.48 ,I OUTLET END 00 i 4" SCH 40 a .N Gco `" �► STUB FOR 9.16 ti DISTRIBUTION / ADDITION a 2 FMS / Box 31 .65 27.40 2000 GAL. . . // / / PORCH i o : 2-COMPARTMENT / BASEMENT SEPTIC TANK 2'x4" " / / EL.=3.04t INLET INVERT 8.98 8.59 INSPECTION > > h FAST TANK COUPLING / 293 i w PORT 1 53.00 47.45 ^� 4"Af SCH 40 ^' / / / ' srue FOR / / EXISTING DWELLING. / W SEPTIC TANK ADDITION / / / F.F.=10.74t�// OUTLET INVERT 8.73 8.34 INSPECTION / SLAB/ /�T.O.F.=8.72t o PORT 2 48.20 50.80 ti • ,> NO BASEMENT S8 Mt // / / \\ x Y D-BOX 8.23 8.03 INLET INVERT END OF , 10 o P.T. / /' �.SLA\ N - CHAMBER, 69,50 64.70 N N � WOOD FILE / / / j �� \. D BOX $,08 7.86 OUTLET INVERTS ROW 1 (TYP.) / // / 1 \ , END OF r ROOM / " CHAMBER ROWS 7 95 7 77 CHAMBER 65.•70 6 8.5 0 / SUN . F.F.=9.1 1 t INLET INVERTS ��ECK ROW 6 / / \ GRADE _ - - - - _ - / / / -- -- - j CHAMBER OF 7,.28 7.10 cLEANouT 1 21 .50 25.75 3' RIGHT OF WAY N EXIST. EROSION TOP OF GRADE CONTROL BARRIER 8.40 8.35 CLEANOUT 2 7.15 24.10 © POLY BARRIER W � EXISTING STONE RETAINING WALL ;'. NOTE: THIS PLAN REPRESENTS A PROGRESS AS-BUILT SHOWING THE INSTALLATION PLAN REFERENCE I OF THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS. "SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN FOR 293 LONG BEACH ROAD _ LIMIT OF ONCE THE FAST SYSTEM IS INSTALLED (SPRING 2010) A FINAL TOPOGRAPHIC CENTERVILLE, MA." t5 COSTAL BANK AS-BUILT WILL BE PREPARED. PREPARED BY: P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC. DATED: APRIL 27, 2007 REVISED: JUNE 2, 2009 ; OWNER: FINAL REVISIONS PER BOARD OF HEALTH 0 ZONINGJOYCE HASEOTES 293 LONG BEACH ROAD SET-CONSERVATION COMMISSION APPROVAL BACK uNE(TYP.) CENTERVILLE, MA. 02362 COMMENTS DATED: SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 ZONE A131 I ZONE V16 GRAPHIC SCALE SEPTIC SYSTEM 20 0 10 20 40 80 PIPING AS- BUILT PLAN FOR ( IN FEET ) 293 LONG BEACH ROAD 1 inch = 20 ft. APPROX. MEAN HIGH WATER CENTERVILLE, MA. _ - - - - _ _ _ _ PREPARED FOR JOYCE HASEOTES OCEAN LEVEL AT 12:15pm ON 3/30/07 293 LONG BEACH ROAD THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR CENTERVILLE, MA. 02362 -.� THE PERSON NAMED HEREON ONLY. 508-737-2267 THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED FOR THE PREPARED BY tiP a�gss SPECIFIC PURPOSE ASSOCIATED WITH THE _ _ _ - _ e - _ _ P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC o� MICHAF goy - - - - - - - - '- - -' - - ® ' '"° APPROX. MEAN LOW WATER - c SEPTIC SYSTEM AS-BUILT ONLY. IF THIS v PEav� coDOCUMENT IS IN THE POSSESSION OF ANY 200 NO. BEDFOR08 S3.'8 E34 'RIDGEWATER MA ass, OTHER PERSON OTHER THAN THE PERSON 9 NAMED HEREON OR THEIR AUTHORIZED 7 WWW.PMPASSOC.COM AGENT, THEN THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE si v ARE REVOKED. SCALE: 1 "=20' PROJECT NO: P007.00 DATE: 12-16-09 REVISION: ARCIHTECTS, INC. AR�TS -INTERIOR DESIGNERS-BUILDERS 947 ROUTE 6A, UNIT 8 f . . . . . . POBOX343 -&--M-y� YARIVIOUTHPORT, MA 02675 'R 0 tel (508) 362-8883 —4883 fax (508) 362 WWW.ERTARCHITECTS.COM tu tr% C-4 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ebk.601 M. ."** - -------1_-`_1_-,-__1_-,__*___-_-1- ADDITIONS & RENOVATIONS '.NO co CL_ C) FOR: c/) THE HASEOTES . .......... ------------------------------------------ FAMILY 293 LONG BEACH ROAD . . . . . . . . .. ----------------- CENTERVILLE MA . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . -------------- - -- --------------------------------- -- . . . . ... . . . .......... ------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- -------------- ......................... ------------------- THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION ----------------------- PURPOSES UNLESS STAMPED & SIGNED — EXISTING TO REMAIN. WITH AN ORIGINAL ARCHITECT'S STAMP AND SIGNATURE & MARKED AS "PERMIT SET" OR "CONSTRUCTION SE ". L---------------------------------------------- L------------------------------------- .. . . . . . . . . .. 2009 ERT ARCHITECTS, INC. THE DRAWINGS AND al PLANS INDICATED THEREON OR REPRESENTED 'ECTS, OF ER ARCHITECTS, NO PAR THEREO SHALL TI BE UTILIZED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM, 0 SEC ND FLOOR PLAN FOR ANY PURPOSE, EXCEPT NTH SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE FIRM ERT ARCHITECTS. INC. (DS!. PROJECT #: 040109 DATE ISSUED: 08.04.09 .. . . . . . . . . . .: XIO WINDOW WALL REVISIONS: REMOVAL OF NEW 2ND FLOOR IN THIS VERSION: 06.03.09 AT REAR OF HOUSE: 06.04.09 . . . . . . . . .. .... . . . . . . REVISED NEW FRONT GABLE .......... .......... TO REFLECT NO 2ND FLR: 06.06.09 DN ....... .................................................. W IL)h.N ............... ...................................................... ... ........... A 'EX l Ism. NEW .... . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . t AAA: MUD RM. PERMIT SET PRICING SET BUILT-INS [RIF .............................. NEW BEDROOM 00. NEW .......... DWMG AREA STACKED WASHER NEW .......... DRYER F01VER is REGISTRATION NEWBEDROOM SCALE:1/4"=V-0" RAISED PANEL— WAINSCOTING 0 4 8 THIS WALL E EXISTING TO REMAIN. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SHEETNO. 7 7 A. I n_RL:S� -T-FL00,R LAN FLOOR PLANS SCALE: 1/8"=11'—O" TOTAL NUMBER OF SHEETS IN SET: 19 THIS SHEET INVALID UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY A COMPLETE SET OF WORK NG DRAWINGS E RT ONC. BND(FND) NOTE: SUBJECT TO AN ORDER OF CONDITIONS SE3-4830 WOOD STAKES IRON PIPE(FND) DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE 1 _ ------� ___ � # NOTE: PLACE HAY BALES SO THE SECTION B z PROJECT BENCHMARK TWINE IS NOT IN CONTACT SOIL EVALUATOR:_____ PATRICK H. CARRARA III ___DATE:_1?s�o�_ a sP o APPROXIMATE LOT LINE EDGE of PAVEMENT NAIL SET IN U WITH THE GROUND (SEE DETAIL). 1 APPROVING AUTHORITY:_DONALD R. DESMARAIS R.S. G.S.EL.= 6.39_ J� Z SEE NOTE 1 AND LONG �A i o�� EXISTING P SUPP RT NET --- ----------- ------ --- oDRIVEWAY EL.=7.34 SECTION A �r PLAN REFERENCES (N.G.V.D. DATUM) ELEV. DEPTH HORIZON SOIL TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLING OTHER �4ti • EXISTING A 6'39 0-9" Ap SANDY LOAM 10YR2/2 NONE VERY FRIABLE, LAWN ROOTS. o °v DRIVEWAY--7-,, EDGE OF PAVEMENT TOP VIEW oo„ - - FILTER FABRIC 5.64 _ N 77 33'55" E Up LIMIT BU ESTUARY WOOD STAKE B S� 6- - - F CONTRIBUTION ZONE FRIABLE, MEDIUM, �N R ROAD r ^ ` _ �� ROW OF DOUBLE 4 97 9-17 Bw SANDY LOAM 1OYR4/6 NONE 5% PEBBLE GRAVEL N'P R��� NG BEACH Up32r0.3 I 1 150.01' I o STAKED HAYBALES 150�10" r: TAPE s1" STRATIFIED FINE TO COARSE SAND S 7T33 55 W ... �8 i• \ ti Tp2 a RESOURCE S�OpE p. 17-85" C1 SAND 2.5Y7/4 RING/BAND LOOSE, SINGLE, GRAIN GRAVELLY ,p AREA r--"' OF 2.5Y4/1 LAYERS, HOLE CAVED IN. .. . . ` ROPOSED _ ► , , �- -0.69 DRIVEWAY '(� EL= 1.31 7'•6 •� r / / �11 \ , l , I (SEE NOTE) r� o i / SSG SITE So�N° 7.9 19.5 xy38 / / t > 0.97 65 OBSERVED GROUNDWATER WEEPING & STANDING 0 ( ) �V 6 l 1 1 NFETRATOR ,QUICK �, LEACHING FIELD / PROPOSED = NP CK IRON PIPES(FND) [ I ( I '\\2\� ` I -6- CONTOUR(TYP.) a� UNDERGROUND '_..\ �� BACKFILL S�G��o� PERCOLATION TEST T 1 [ p Q EXISTING 7• t (, t 1 1 �I 1 I Tp4 - ,, r �_ J ELEC. (SEE NOTE) NATURAL SOIL 3 28 07 �r SPOT O 18REAKOMTLEL810 .-�-- - JTp1r ,�' �; PERFORMED BY:___ PATRICK CARRARA III __DATE._ / C GRADE(TYP.) ,� _ ---C ,,, 6 �r r r z; PROPOSED DRIVEWAY NOTE: _-_ _ --- --- �\\ � VENT ,-1' ' r ' u; THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS TO BE FENCE JOINT DETAIL APPROVING AUTHORITY:_DONALD R. DESMARAIS_,R.S. z LIMIT OF ESTUARY 7'9 D BOXi INSPEC OR__T(T P!)/�I .._'_�\ I -� r �r E VIE- AR A rt ` ° W CONSTRUCTED WITH A PERVIOUS SURFACE ® - -0 � Y : TREATMENT. (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN.) E R 0 S I 0 N C 0 N T R 0 L BARRIER DEPTH OF PERC SHELF _24�42= EL= 4_39 LOCUS MAP :5 CONTRIBUTION ZONE j^j'5' REMOVE I w r r �r �r c� °- ; AND REPLACE i \ r� r� r 23.6' °- PROVIDE PERVIOUS SURFACE START PRE-SOAK ____ 9_58 _ END PRE-SOAK a I MATERIALS PER CON. COM. D ETA I L (TYnN TIME CAD 12" = TIME CAA 9" _10:01 TIME @ 6" N SPECIFICATIONS 7• , �.� EXIST. & .. . RYWELL - ----- ------ I, ! i I ,, ' . -' g.._ - �. D I SPECIAL CONDITION #17. *25 GALLONS, COULD NOT MAINTAIN 12"* PERC RATE _ <2 _ MPI 1 T E SEPTIC SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED E :- NOT TO SCALE HE COMPLETE I I I l -- - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS OF ' I �\ 310 CMR 15.00 THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE 1 1,01 , I \ N NOTES: DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE 2 TITLE V: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUBSURFACE 8.1 {' I � DISPOSAL OF SANITARY SEWAGE, AS WELL AS LOCAL, 2_0 SCH 40 \\\\ \ 1. THIS PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO ESTABLISH PROPERTY LINES OR MUNICIPAL, AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THIS PLAN REQUIRES APPROVAL is /07 \� (� pp i n � ' SEE NOTE) x'' FMS SEE PROFILE EXISTING \ I OTVNERSHIP OF LAND. IT DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY SOIL EVALUATOR:_____ PATRICK H_CARRARA III _____DATE:-3/2I � w-H -' - 2. ALL PIPING SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. UNDER BARNSTABLE CODE PROPOSED i 1t5 GARAGE �\ _ BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, OF THE LOT LINES. APPROVING AUTHORITY:_DONALD R. DESMARAISL_R.S.-__G.S.EL.= 6.19_ � POL BARRIER I I , ( VIE T \\ �' x�: �" \SLAB=6.7�\ -- 3. SEPTIC TANK, GREASE TRAP & PUMP CHAMBER SHALL r ,, \ o ci 2. THIS PLAN IS NOT TO BE RECORDED AT A REGISTRY OF DEEDS. CHAPTER 360 ARTICLE III `t: (SEC DETAIL) w � I I I ( \\\ \tO - o -- \\ �.'\ ELEV. DEPTH HORIZON SOIL TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLING OTHER BE PRECAST REINFORCED WATERTIGHT CONCRETE (4000 360--3. o, I ( I - \\� \ 3a 3. THIS PLAN MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS IN REGARD TO WETLANDS - PSI AT 28 DAYS) WITH SUITABLE WATERTIGHT ACCESS �11 �'' � � I ° S H 40 �` \ 1s.48', EXIS . ATE EXCEPT AS NOTED HEREON. 6.19 0 8" A SANDY LOAM 10YR2 2 NONE VERY FRIABLE LAWN ROOTS. MANHOLES (20" MIN.) AND PIPE PENETRATION KNOCK- INV=8.94 t t' \ \�, /METE p / OUTS. HEAVY DUTY HS-20 WHEEL LOADING REQUIRED THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN 100 FT. 5.52 " WHEN STRUCTURES ARE TO BE LOCATED IN AREAS BLOWER UNIT NOTE: :N 5 \ \ v T J OF A WETLAND. 5 02 s-14 Bw SANDY LOAM 10YR4/6 NONE FRIABLE, MEDIUM, 5% PEBBLE. SUBJECT TO TRAFFIC. THE BLOWER UNIT IS TO BE PLACED ON A �` o- �\ / / / /��PORCH EXISTING WATER THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE LOCATED WITHIN A ZONE A. " SAND MIXED WITH TOP 4. DISTRIBUTION Bo To A PRECAST AT °' a' �� AD 110 ,`PROPOSED / / NEW 2 OFMS✓ / �, AND GAS SERVICES 14-22 F FILL I X BE EC ST WATERTIGHT 1 THICK CONCRETE PEDESTAL. THE ELEVATION o o. �3.5 N �\ / INV.=6.5t BASEMENT} ) 4. THE INSTALLATION OF THE NO AGGREGATE HIGH CAPACITY 4.35 AND SUB SOIL. STRUCTURE WITH A BAFFLE AND SUFFICIENT PIPE ON THE PEDESTAL IS TO BE ABOVE THE FLOOD re)to I 2 BEDROOM / / EL.=3.04f (SEE NOTES 1 ��\ADDITION \ / / 293 . / W SYSTEM MUST BE DONE BY A PERSON TRAINED BY INFILTRATOR " 60" BAND STRATIFIED FINE TO COARSE PENETRATION KNOCKOUTS. ELEVATION OF 1 1. 8: 5 0\ / / / �# / 22-80 Cl SAND 2.5Y7 4 OF 2.5Y4 1 5. ALL SYSTEM COMPONENTS SHALL BE MARKED WITH TO BE SET ON•PIER_S / EXISTING DWELLING w SYSTEMS, INC. TO INSTALL THIS TYPE OF LEACHING SYSTEM. -0.47 / EL.=1.19 SAND, LOOSE, SINGLE GRAIN NEW SEPTIC TANK NOTE: 8.4 1 1 I 1 \\ F.F.=13.Ot.\ / / F.F.=10.74f 5. THE INSTALLER MUST FOLLOW THE LATEST "SEPTIC SYSTEM GRAVELLY LAYERS. MAGNETIC MARKING TAPE OR A COMPARABLE MEANS i� ` (MUST MEET CODE) / / /T•O.F.=8.72t IN ORDER TO LOCATE THEM ONCE BURIED. THE SECTION JOINTS ON THE NEW SEPTIC TANK I 1 I SLAB/ o INSTALLATION MANUAL FOR INFILTRATOR QUICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBERS 0.77 65 OBSERVED r,ROUNDWATER (WEEPING & STANDING 1 1 ► I v 'may \ 11.73 NO BASEMENT i Y IN MASSACHUSETTS" BY INFILTRATOR SYSTEMS, INC. AS A CONDITION 6. CAST IRON FRAME & COVER WHEN REQUIRED SHALL BE ARE TO BE WRAPPED WITH 6 EASY WRAP OR 1 I ` \\ EQUIVALENT TO ENSURE THAT THE JOINT IS 1 1 1 I _�= SLAB=8.67t EN 4 C.I. \ o FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS LEACHING SYSTEM. MEDIUM DUTY OR HEAVY DUTY FOR TRAFFIC AREAS. l i 1 1 I I I I o� \\\ / / INV. 6,54t� 'SLAB � DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE #3 ALL COVERS AT GRADE SHALL BE PROPERLY SECURED WATER TIGHT. PROP. 2000 GAL. 0 I ; , I I Imo- 1 X _ I / / // / �- 6. THIS SITE IS NOT LOCATED IN A DEP ZONE If. SO AS TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS. REMOVE AND REPLACE NOTE: 2-COMPARTMENT I� f 4.5 / / SOIL EVALUATOR:_____ PATRICK H. CARRARA III ___�_DATE:_3/28/07 7, IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS DESIGN THAT ALL MATERIALS FAST TANK 1 I cn I I I / / 7. PER 310 CMR 15.229(2)(c) THE NEW NON-GRINDER EJECTOR -- -- -- - AND CONSTRUCTION BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH TITLE V. SHOULD ANY PORTION OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM BE 1 °� { / / `'' \ PUMP MUST BE EQUIPED WITH A STAND-BY POWER SOURCE. APPROVING AUTHORITY: DONALD R. DESMARAIS R S. _G.S.EL.= _6.39- ANY SUBSTITUTIONS OR DEVIATIONS MUST BE APPROVED I 1 1 rf I / / SUN ROOM / \DECK -�.__--' ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE AREA OF THE NEW 1 i m F•F,=9.1 1 t PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. LEACHING SYSTEM, THE CONTAMINATED SOILS SHALL ! _``� / / / \\\ ELEV. DEPTH HORIZON SOIL TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLING OTHER // 8. FILL MATERIAL TO CONFORM WITH THE LATEST BE REMOVED TO A DISTANCE OF 5 FT. FROM THE I 6 39 p-g" Ap SANDY LOAM 10YR2/2 NONE VERY FRIABLE LAWN ROOTS. REQUIREMENTS OF 310 CMR 15.255. INSTALLER IS EDGE OF THE NEW LEACHING SYSTEM AND REPLACED M. s EXIST. SEE SHEET 2 FOR THE I N S P ECTI O N R E Q U I R E M E N T 5.64 FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING A SIEVE ANALYSIS -•- WITH SAND FILL PER SPECIFICATION NOTE #8 3' RIGHT_�I 7 CESSPOOL I 9-16" Bw SANDY LOAM 10YR4/6 NONE FRIABLE MEDIUM, 5% PEBBLE. PLOTPERF D ON THE FILL OFSIEVE ANALYSIS RIALS. A SHALLB COPY PRO PROVIDED TO OF WAY o (SEE NOTE) SCHEDULE REQUIRED PER 310 CMR 15.021 5.05 ' I E v EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM NOTE: �, I APPROX. LOC. OF PROP. EROSION I 16-80" Cl SAND 2.5Y7 4 NONE STRATIFIED FINE TO COARSE THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE BOARD OF HEALTH THE EXISTING CESSPOOL IS TO BE \ UNDERGROUND ONTROL BARRIER -O 27 / SAND, LOOSE, SINGLE GRAIN PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF THE AS-BUILT DRAWING. I OIL TANK SEE DETAIL PROP. EROSION PROVIDE WATER TIGHT GRAVELLY LAYERS. PUMPED, CRUSHED, AND BACKFILLED. ( ) FIN. GRADE " 9. THE DESIGN IS INTENDED TO MEET THE TITLE V AND i^ (TO BE REMOVED) EXISTING STONE _ CONTROL BARRIER ACCESS COVER AT GRADE \ \9' RETAINING WALL (SEE DETAIL) FIN. GRADE-9.25f EL 9.4t 0.39 72 OBSERVED GROUNDWATER (WEEPING & STANDING) OFHTHIS PLAN ADOES NOT IRGUARANTEE THAT ETHE AS�STEM GAS SERVICE NOTE: \ \ �9� L EX. GRADE AT (SEE SPEC #6) PERCOLATION TEST T 3 WILL BE INSTALLED AS DESIGNED, NOR DOES THIS THE EXISTING GAS SERVICE WAS LOCATED FROM \ DIG SAFE MARKS AND FLAGS. Xxxx xxxXXXx xxxxXxXxX xXxxXx XxxXXxxxxXxxxX BOTTOM OF SLOPE p \ X X X X X x X X X x X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X x x x x x x x x X x X X x x x x X x EL 7.9t PLAN GUARANTEE THE OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM. \ Est PERFORMED BY:___ PATRICK H_CARRARA III ---DATE:_3/28/07 GARBAGE GRINDER NOTE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC NOTE: \ ( y� -- IF THE DWELLING CURRENTLY HAS A GARBAGE THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WAS LOCATED EXISTING LIMIT OF T' APPROVING AUTHORITY: R._DESMARAIS_R.S._-_ GRINDER THIS DESIGN REQUIRES THAT THE \ 15-"I CONTOUR(TYP.) COSTAL BANK 15 FROM DIG SAFE MARKS AND FLAGS. - _- - GARBAGE GRINDER BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE _ I / TOP OF CHAMBERS DEPTH OF PERC SHELF - 30_I8'= EL= 3_89 INSTALLATION OF THE NEW LEACHING SYSTEM. l OP OF BARRIER EL 8.10 WATER SERVICE NOTE: - - - -8-- - - - - - - EL.8.35 2. START PRE-SOAK 10:02 END PRE-SOAK 10:17 IF THE GARBAGE GRINDER 1S NOT REMOVED, OR ------------ ----- THE EXISTING DWELLING IS SERVED BY TOWN WATER. i oo PROVIDE A 5' WIDE PLANTING _ ® ® B TIME @ 12" N TIME @ 9" 10:05_ TIME CAD 6" IF A NEW GARBAGE GRINDER IS INSTALLED, APPROXIMATE LOCATION IS SHOWN. _ _ - - - - - - - BED PER CON. COM. SPECIAL ZONING SET- - -8 10' . _ * _ --;,-- ------ THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE ARE REVOKED AND FINAL GRADING NOTE: CONDITION #20. BACK LINE(TYP.) 5 25 GALLONS, COULD NOT MAINTAIN 12 * PERC RATE _ _<2 MPI THE DESIGN IS CONSIDERED VOIDED. _ _ _ _ _ (EDGE OF REMOVE DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE 4 FINAL SITE GRADING SHALL PROVIDE PROPER - - - - - - - - - - - POLY f' ONLAND Y ON WESTERN END # DESIGN CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE LEACHING SYSTEM 6-- ZONE A13 - -7 BARRIER SEE PLAN BOTTOM OF CHAMBERS AND THE BUILDING STRUCTURES. - - - - - - - FOR LOCATION 3 28 07 DAILY SEWAGE FLOW: I - - - - - - - _ EL. 7.10 SOIL EVALUATOR: ___ PATR►CK H_CARRARAIIL -_-_-DATE:_ �__ ZONE V16 - - - - - - -'�'--�- - - 6 _ BEDROOMS Q 1 10 GPD = _660 _ GPD BREAKOUT ELEVATION NOTE: -6 APPROVING AUTHORITY: DONALD R. DESMARAIS,_R.S.___G.S.EL.= _8.15_ DESIGN FLOW = _660 _ GPD THE BREAKOUT ELEVATION IS THE TOP OF CHAMBER 5` , - - - - - - - _ - ® - _ - - - - ® - _ ® _ BOTTOM 04.35BARRIER ELEV. DEPTH HORIZON SOIL TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLING OTHER GARBAGE GRINDER : NOT ALLOWED (SEE NOTE) ELEVATION. THE 15 FT. DISTANCE IS TO BE MEASURED - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ GPD FROM THE BOTTOM OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE CHAMBERS. 5 P 0 �Y BARRIER DETAIL 6.15 0-24'" F o FILL - - TOPSOIL, SAND FILL. ADD TOTAL DEOSIGDNSIFLOW GN LOW 66o GPD (PER DEP TRANSMITTAL No. W023699 INTERIOR PLUMBING NOTE: 4 - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5.40 24-33 Ab g SANDY LOAM 1OYR2/2 NONE FRIABLE, BURIED A HORIZON. SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY: NOTES: NOT TO SCALE 4•81 33-40" Bw SANDY LOAM 10YR4/6 NONE FRIABLE, MEDIUM, 5% PEBBLE. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: THE INTERIOR PLUMBING IN THE EXISTING DWELLING APPROX. MEAN HIGH WATER -4 IS TO BE RE-ROUTED TO THE NEW NON-GRINDER - '- ""- _ - 1. CONSTRUCTION TO BE SUPERVISED BY THE ENGINEER AND HEALTH AGENT. " STRATIFIED FINE TO COARSE TOTAL DESIGN FLOW X 200% = _ 1320 GAL EJECTOR PUMP. ALL INTERIOR PLUMBING SHALL 3- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - _. - - - - - - - - - -3 2. POLY BARRIER SHALL BE 40 MIL. THICKNESS MINIMUM. 40-102 Cl SAND 2.5Y7/4 NONE SAND LOOSE, SINGLE GRAIN TOTAL CAPACITY PROVIDED = _2000 -0.35 GRAVELLY LAYERS. GAL CONFORM TO ALL STATE AND LOCAL PLUMBING CODES. 3. THE BOTTOM OF THE BARRIER SHALL BE 1 FT. MINIMUM MULTIPLE COMPARTMENT TANK FOR NEW PLUMBING NOTE: OCEAN LEVEL AT 12:15pm ON 3/30/07 BELOW EXISTING NATURAL GROUND ELEVATION AND TO 0.65 90" OBSERVED GROUNDWATER (WEEPING & STANDING) HIGH STRENGTH FAST 1.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2 THE ELEVATION SPECIFIED. THE LENGTH OF THE BUILDING SEWER FROM THE 2- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FIRST COMPARTMENT - SETTELING ZONE: ADDITION TO THE NEW SEPTIC TANK MAY VARY POLICY/SOP/GUIDELINE #: BRP/DWM/WPeP/G02-1 BEDROOM COUNT NOTE: THE NUMBER OF BEDROOM FOR THIS MINIMUM CAPACITY =_500_GAL FROM THE LENGTH SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN IS BASED ON FLOOR PLANS FOR THE EXISTING DWELLING =-75of_GAL MAINTAIN A MIN. 2% SLOPE TO THE SEPTIC TANK. 1- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - i AND FOR THE PROPOSED ADDITION. CAPACITY PROVIDED _ - - - - - - - - - - SECOND COMPARTMENT - TREATMENT ZONE: EXISTING CONDITIONS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY: - -' - ® ® - '- - - - - ® - - APPROX. MEAN LOW WATER - MINIMUM CAPACITY =__750_GAL P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC CAPACITY PROVIDED =_1250t GAL 200 NORTH BEDFORD STREET o THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM: a� FOR THE PERSON NAMED HEREON ONLY. PERC RATE =3_MPI DESIGN RATE _ <5 MPI o MICHAE ��- / THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED FOR THE EAST BRIDGEWATER, MA. �P s , ,r LOCAL BENCHMARK PLAN REFERENCE: PLAN REFERENCES: F.I.R.M. ,MAP .250001 0008D ZONING DISTRICT EXISTING LOT & DWELLING (RD) Z PER EA ;_r SPECIFIC PURPOSE ASSOCIATED WITH THE EFFLUENT LOADING RATE _ _0_74 GPD/SF PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, A BENCHMARK SHALL BE PLACED LA NCOMPILED PLAN OF LAND L.C. PLAN 14594A v C ; SEPTIC SYSTEM. IF THIS DOCUMENT LS 660 GPD / LL GPD/SF = _892_ SF WITHIN 50 'TO 75 FT. OF THE LEACHING FACILITY. THE SYSTEM P 2g3 LONG BEACH ROAD L.C. PLAN 16179A THIS SITE IS ,LOCATED IN ZONES: RESOURCE PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT - �J, it, IN THE POSSESSION INFILTRATOR u BENCHMARK WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO DISLOCATION OR MIN. LOT AREA = 87,120 SF. MIN. LOT FRONTAGE = 20 FT. 1 4 r a OF ANY OTHER QUICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBERS , CENTERVILLE, MA PLAN BOOK 112 PAGE 145 A13 100YR FLOOD EL.11 v� ., r 4 LOSS DURING CONSTRUCTION. SCALE 1 �� = 2O FT BY P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC. PLAN BOOK 161 PAGE 1 V16 10OYR. COSTAL FLOOD ZONE EXIST. LOT AREA = 28,750f SF. EXIST. FRONTAGE = 150 FT. FS �., .! PERSON OTHER THAN THE PERSON NAMED GRAVEL-LESS FIELD/BED CONFIGURATION HEREON OR THEIR AUTHORIZED AGENT, ACTUAL AREA = 19.5 FTx38 FT = 741 SF. MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK = 30 ET. ASSESSORS MAP 185 - . DATED: 5/19/08 DEED REFERENCE WITH VELOCITY (WAVE ACTION) EL.15 MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK = 15 FT. r THEN THE SEAL, SIGNATURE, AND DESIGN PER DEP TRANSMITTAL NUMBER W023699 LAND COUT CERT.#58363 MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK = 15 FT. PARCEL 034 ARE REVOKED. EFFECTIVE AREA = 4.72 SF LFx228 LF =1076.2 SF. PROPOSED ADDITION FINSHED FLOOR=13.Ot (MUST MEET CODE) PROVIDE WATER TIGHT INSPECTION 3"0 VENT AREA 30,498.8 SE.t � (SEE PLAN FOR FINISHED GRADES) & PUMP ACCESS ACCESS COVERS WITH FILTER PROVIDE WATER TIGHT TOTAL AREA 1076.2 SF. > 892 SF. REQUIRED. AT GRADE. FIN. GRADESS CO ACCESS COVER AT GRADE „ 4"0 SCH. 40 FIN. GRADE=9.25t " IMPORTANT HOMEOWNERS NOTE: INSPECTION PORT (4 0 SCH 40 PVC) 6 ROWS OF INFILTRATOR TOP OF EXISTING PVC BUILDING 4"� scH. ao (SEE SPEC #6) INSPECTION PORT (4 0 SCH 40 PVC) THE SEPTIC SYSTEM IS PROVIDED WITH A HIGH- PROVIDE SCREW CAP TO WITHIN FINISHED GRADE EL.=9,4t SEWER - PVC CLEANOUT (SEE SPEC #6) PROVIDE SCREW CAP TO WITHIN STRENGTH FAST 1.0 TREATMENT DEVICE. THERE IS A 3" OF FINISHED GRADE. PROVIDE (SEE PROPOSED GRADING) QUICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBERS SEPTIC SYSTEM FOUNDATION. 8.72t (SEE PLAN VIEW) 3" OF FINISHED GRADE. PROVIDE 2 INSPECTION PORTS. NOTE: NO AGGREGATE IS USED 2 INSPECTION PORTS. ANNUAL DEED EMAINTENANCE STRICTION AAND REPORT.T IS ALONG WITH TOP OF CHAMBER (SEE NOTES 5 & 6) DESIGN PORCH ' �'�� \ \ � GEOTEXTILE I'll / FIN. GRADE 9.4f VENT WITH FILTER FABRIC FIELD EL.= 8.10 9" MIN 2'0 SCH 40 TO BLOWER (SEE PROPOSED GRADING) CHARCOAL FILTER FOR XX MAX. SLOPE \'\'/��1 \FT. MIN \��\ �i\:% \\'. `� �\� 3 HORIZ. 293 LONG BEACH ROAD ' ,\\,. .• INVERT' CENTERVILLE NIA. 3 FT. MAX .� �,�\ EL.= 7.77 40" 1 VERT. INLET INV. 4"0 SCH 40 L= 10.5 FT. GEOTEXTILE AND FILL PER ��, 2 0 SCH 40 FMS EL.- 8.94 24 FT. - - TOP OF CHAMBERS 1 FT. MIN 15 FT MIN. DISTANCE " (SEE HEADER NOTE) FILTER FABRIC EL.= 8.10 3 FT. MAX �. SPECIFICATION i� \ / PREPARED FOR TO 4 0 SCH 40 It FL-OW LINE s=o.ot3Fr/Fr S= 0.01 FT/FT. � `:NOTE �8 -: (SEE BREAKOUT NOTE) �\\,�\�\\ \ 4"0 BUILDING SEWER - /i\/\\ BYRON & JOYCE HASEOTES p PROVIDE L=-20 FT. OTTOM OF CHAMBERS EL. 7.10 293 LONG BEACH ROAD CHECK VALVE 10' 1250 GALL rn MAINTAIN POSITIVE S= 0.0�_FT./FT.(MIN.) TREATMENT 6" e - 34" - 34" 6" 34" N BASEMENT UPWARD SLOPE ZONE INLET INV. OUTLET INV. a� on so ® ®!i 19.5'(234") CENTERVILLE, MA. 02362 FLOOR 750 GAL.t .= 8.03 EL.= 7.8s ��E�I�, 5 0 8-7 3 7-2 2 6 7 � EL. 3.04f SETTLING EL INLET INV. LEACHING CHAMBER FIELD NOTE. s" LAYER 1 3s t PREPARED BY NEW INVERT AT ZONE EL.= 7.77 THE INFILTRATOR CHAMBERS ARE TO o FOUND.= 6.5t INLET INV. �� �� CR. STONE 38 (TOTAL) 5 FT. MINIMUM BE BACKFILLED WITH TITLE 5 SAND N (SEE INTERIOR EL.= 8.59 D BOX BOTTOM OF CHAMBER I PLUMBING NOTE) IL BOTTOM OF CHAMBER 0 9 UNITS AND 2 END CAPS PER ROW - 6 ROWS TOTAL) EL.= 7.10 INSTALLER TO REMOVE & REPLACE 5.10 PROVIDED TO THE LEVEL OF THE TOP OF THE P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC > SRP SIDE INLET L� CHAMBER UNITS. Q s" LAYER CR. STONE 8 OUTLET "D"BOX OR EQUAL. EL.= 7.10 � o TOPSOIL, SUBSOIL OR OTHER UNSUITABLE 200 N0. BEDFORD ST., E. BRIDGEWATER, MA fy NEW NON-GRINDER NEW 2000 GAL 2000 GAL. 2-COMPARTMENT � > OR IMPERVIOUS SOIL A MINIMUM OF 5 FT HIGH GROUNDWATER PER BOH EL. 2.00 508-378-3421 EJECTOR PUMP SEPTIC TANK SUITABLE FOR OUTLET INV. TO BE WATER TESTED TO - 0 6 ROWS OF LATERALLY IN ALL DIRECTIONS BEYOND THE SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER EL. 1.31 (Tp1) o GOULDS GWP 23x30 HIGH STRENGTH CONFIRM EQUAL DISTRIBUTION � SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NO: P007.00 --� OR EQUAL. THE INSTALLATION of THE EL.= 8.34 DURING THE AS-BUIILT SURVEY CL OUTER PERIMETER OF THE SYSTEM AND DOWN = FAST 1 .0 HIGH STRENGTH FAST 1.0 UNIT INFILTRATOR QUICK 4 TO THE NATURALLY OCCURRING PERVIOUS DETERMINED BY: ❑ OBSERVATION OF ACTUAL ANNUAL HIGH WATER TABLE DATE: 4/27/07 REVISION : 1/13/09 (SEE NOTE 7) STANDARD CHAMBERS I SEPTIC TANK CHAMBER FIELD HEADER PIPE NOTE: L` � MATERIAL AS NOTED WHEN THE FOLLOWING Q SOIL COLOR USING MOTTLING ❑ FRIMPTER METHOD SHEET 1 OF 2 ESTUARY CONT. ZONE) � BOX IS CHECKED. SEE SPECIFICATION 8. v (SEE SHEET 2) SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR INSTALLATION THE LENGTHS OF THE HEADER PIPES FROM THE .- FIELD CONFIGURATION REVISION 3/10/09(ADDITION FOOTPRINT) SYSTEM PROFILE 0 FI LE D-BOX TO THE CHAMBER ROWS WILL VARY. ui REMOVE A AND B HORIZONS AND FILL AS TY P . QUICK 4 CHAMBER SECTION REVISION : 3/30/09(MOVE SEPTIC SYSTEM) cy NOT TO SCALE INSTRUCTIONS AND DETAILS ALL CHAMBER ROWS ARE TO START AT SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER SHOWN IN SOIL LOGS TO AN APPROXIMATE REVISION: 6/2/09 (REMOVE BR & FRONT DECK) THE SAME INVERT ELEVATION (7.77). = EL. = 1.31 (Tp1) HIGH GROUNDWATER PER BOH EL. 2.00 ELEVATION OF 4.8f DEPTH VARIES FIELD CONFIGURATION NOT TO SCALE REVISION: 9/8/09 (BOH & CON COM APPROVAL Opening tor FAS I NOTES NOTES module to sit on tank 17---BFower piping to FAST@ may not exceed 100 FT [30.5m] total r-----------------------------r-r----------------------------------------------- l. Blower piping to FAST@ may not exceed 100 FT 30.5m total r------"-"-""_---_--"---_""__-r-r---------- length and use 4 elbows maximum. For distances greater than ; 500 Gallon MIN ; ; z 12 MIN ; length and use a maximum of 4 elbows in the plppin system (@ l 500 Gallon MIN I I z I 100 FT [30.5m] - Consult factory. Blower must be located above l [1900L MIN] [30.5 MIN] I 100FT [30m]). For distances greater than 100 FT [30m1 consult flood/standing water levels on a concrete base 24" X 18" X1" ' ' ' CZ ry. [I 900L MIN] I I � l o z 26 5/9'+1/2„ I facto Blower must by located above flood levels on a { l o z [61 X45.7X2.6c minimum. J [67.6±1.31 , concrete base 24 X 18 Xl [61 X 45.7 X 2.6cm] min. 2. Vent to be located above finish grade or higher to avoid l o� 2. Vent to be located above finish grade or higher to avoid O o �� infiltration. Cap with a vent grate with at least 9.1 sq in.[58.7 sq. o� infiltration. Cap with vent grate w/at least 9.1 sq in. [58.7 sq. r; '�� - 1 -1- 53 1/4" MIN 541/2' MIN cm] open surface area.Secure with stainless steel screws (see LO `u' 9" '- 541 2"MIN cm] open surface area. Secure with stainless steel screws (see -' ' ' -- -I- [135.3 MIN] [138.4 MIN] sheet 4 of 4 HSFAST@ 0.90 Details). I0 sheet 4 of 4 HSFAST@ 1.00 Details. [l 4.5] ,- � [l 38.4 MIN l ) i I i ,� i Or or I Run Vent to desired location and cover opening with a vent 54„ Run vent to desired location and cover opening with vent See Note 6 I I a grate with at least 9.1 sq in.[58.7 sq. cm] open surface area. 1137.21 I grate w/at least 9.1 sq in. [58.7 sq. cm] of open surface area. I 31 1/4"±1/2" Secure with stainless steel screws.Vent piping must not allow See Note 6 m S Settling! 0 [79.5±1.31 excess moisture build up or back pressure. Secure with stainless steel screws. Vent piping must not allow g, c Settling I I v - ; excess moisture build up or back pressure. I Zone I I �N 3. All appurtenances to FAST® e. . tank um outs, etc. must a� -----------------------"---L-.L- - p gg Zone � � �N � `- ------"---------"-----"-"---------"--------- conform to all applicable counfry, state province and local ' _----"""""--_----"-L-L"--__--.-_- � 3. All appurtenances to FAST@ (e.g. tank pump outs, etc.) must 59"MIN Opening for FAST plumbing and electrical codes. Blower control system by Bio- ------ f d 21/7' conform to all country, state, province, an local plumbing [149.9 MIN] module to sit in tank Microbics, Inc. and electrical codes. The blower control system is provided by y 4. Tank volume must be increased by 20%if minimum of 10 inches [6.4] Electrical conduit from blower controls stem to Electrical conduit from blower control system to border for sealing Bio-Microbics, Inc. blower/blower housing.See notes 1, 3, &8 blower/blower housing.See notes 1,3, &8 and securing the Cons ltlactory is used between the unit and the base of tank. 23 7/8" rid and liner to tank 4. Tank volume must be increased by 20% if minimum of 10 inches 23 7/8" All plumbing and venting Consult for approval. [25.5cm] is used between the unit and the base of tank. [60.81 must use water tight gaskets 5. The rimy compartment may be a separate tank. [60.81 All plumbing and venting See note 7 & 10 primary P Y P must use water tight gaskets Consult factory for approval. Inspection/ Pump g g 3' [8]QS MIN Vent out Ports 6. Either the influent pipe tee shall be fitted with a pipe cap or the See note 2&8 5. The primary compartment may be a separate tank. 20" See note 3, 7, &8 baffle separating the two zones shall be extended all the way 2 Y [50.71 to the top of the tank. If choosing to use the pipe cap.Then [50.7 Inspection/ Pump out 6. Either the influent pipe tee shall be fitted with a pipe capor the the baffle shall be at least 3" [8cm]higher than the water level Ports See note 3, 7, &8 Joints must be baffle separating the two zones shall be extended to th top of as shown on the drawing. watertight the tank. If choosing to use the pipe cap, then the baffle shall 7. All inspection,viewing and pump out ports must be secured to be at least 3"[8] higher than the water level as shown on the AST0�eated prevent accidental or unauthorized access. -- drawing. --- N MAX 61/,V Effluent 8. Tank, piping, conduit, blower housing pad and vents are [1.2 m MAX] [16] 7. All inspection, viewing and pump out ports must be secured to 2' [5]O MIN See note 9 provided by others. see note 6 prevent accidental or unauthorized access Blower Piping 3 [8]O MIN Vent See note 2 Z9. All piping and ancillary equipment installed after FAST must not 2 [5]O MIN 8. Tank, anchors, piping, conduit, blower housing pad and vents _ ----.- impede or restric free flow of effluent. Blower Piping are provided by others. 16 3/8" MIN 10. The air supply line into the FAST@ unit must be secured to „+ 9. All piping and ancillary equipment installed after FAST@ must 3°MIN [41.6 MIN 1 prevent vibration Induced damage.The air supply line should 3"MIN 15 1/8 _1/8 not impede or restrict free flow of effluent. [7.6MIN] see note 12 e secured with a non-corrosive clamp every 2 min [5cm]. [7.6MIN] [38.4±0.31 P - 11. Min height may be reduced, consult factory and reference - 10. No more than 4 FT [1.2 m] of fill may be placed over unit lid. o "Short-FAST-Module-Procedure.pdf' � 4" [10]0 Unit may stand inside tank (see sheet 2 of 4 HS FAST® 1.00 with os; 4'MIN ������ �� 12. Refer to sheet 4 of 4 HSFAST@ 1.00 Details drawin for le os; �ri4w fM10@G30OC30@ FAST treated feet). Refer to installation manual for more details. 4 Influent 15.2 [10.2 MIN] extensions requirements. g g 152 [10.2MIN1 effluentMOORPORKTED waste 347/8 +1/8" [10.2] T- " see note 9 10.2 [88.4±0.31 \'L Influent DO NOT SCALE see note 6 DO NOT SCALE waste 41 1/4"MIN see note 6 [104.6 MIN] UNLESS NOTED I ', T �� `' ��` ] UNLESS NOTED Treatment DIMENSIONS i DIMENSIONS ] ARE IN INCHES 1a1 MIN ARE IN INCHES x Zone ] a Settling Treatment - CENTIMETERS `� " 1WMIN [CENTIMETERS] �" � �eT i m C�0 iR P C R A T E l [25.5 MIN] [CENTIMETERS] ,; t Settling See note 5 Zone Zone see c ° >� P O R A T E D [25.5MIN1 TOLERANCES TOLERANCES See note 5 Zone see note 4 ±0.02IN/IN 61/9' ±0.021N/IN [±0.05 CM/CM] HighStrengthFAST 1.00 FAST Unit [15.6] [±0.05 CM/CM] HighStrengthFAST 1.00 FAST Unit pipe length see WEIGHT lb SIZE DRAWING NUMBER HSFAST1.00 Details WEIGHT lb SIZE DRAWING NUMBER THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF BIO-MICROBICS INC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A NAME I DATE A HSFAST@ 1.00 with lid SHEET THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF BIO-MICROBICS INC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A NAME DATE A HSFASTO 1.00 with feet SHEET WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BIO-MICROBICS INC.IS PROHIBITED.DESIGN AND INVENTION RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.IN THE BIO-MICROBICS @ 2008 DRAWN CTC 2/18/2006 1 OF 4 WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BIO-MICROBICS INC.IS PROHIBITED.DESIGN AND INVENTION RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.IN THE BIO-MICROBICS © 2008 DRAWN CTC 2/18/2D06 2 OF 4 INTEREST OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT,ALL PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO DESIGN AND OR MATERIAL CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. INTEREST OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT,ALL PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO DESIGN AND OR MATERIAL CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. CHECKED PF 7/24/2008 REVISED Thursday,July 24,2008 REV. INI-01-E CHECKED PF 7/24/2008 REVISED Thursday,July 24,2008 7 REV. INI-01-E Specifications for HighStrengthFAST 1.00 Wastewater Treatment System Minimum leg extension assembly 2"Air psee note 4 2 screws per Supply 1. GENERAL NDs 6"Grate MIN 9.1 Q side included in[58. e a ea open Line surface area The contractor shall furnish and install (1) HighStrengthFAST@ 1.00 treatment system as manufactured by Bio-Microbics, Inc. The treatment system shall be complete with all needed equipment as every 2 feet Non-corrosive clamp shown on the drawings and specified herein. The principal items of equipment shall include FAST@ system insert, leg extensions, or lid, blower assembly, blower controls and alarms. All other items will be provided by others. The HighStrengthFAST@ 1.00 unit shall be situated within a 750 Gallon[2800L] minimum compartment or tank as shown on the plans, or in a 1250 gallon [4700L] one compartment tank. Suggested maximum settling zone is (1 X) the daily flow. Tank(s) must conform to local, state, and all other applicable codes. The contractor shall provide coordination between the FAST system and tank supplier with regard to fabrication of the tank, installation of the FAST unit and delivery to the job site. 2. OPERATING CONDITIONS The Hig hStrength FAST@ 1.00 treatment system shall be capable of treating the High strength wastewater produced by commercial facilities producing appropriate waste to develop and sustain a viable biomass. Waste containing inhibitory substances is not recommended for treatment in the FAST system. Consult factory for proper sizing and usage. 3. MEDIA The FAST media shall be manufactured of rigid PVC, polyethylene, or polypropylene and it shall be supported by the polyethylene insert. The media shall be fixed in position and contain no Riser moving or wearing parts and shall not corrode. The media shall be designed and installed to ensure that sloughed solids descend through the media to the bottom of the septic tank. 012"MIN FAST@ Air Liff 4. BLOWER [30.5 MIN] The HighStrengthFAST 0.90 unit shall come equipped with a regenerative type blower capable of delivering 20-45 CFM [38-85 m3/hr]. The blower assembly shall include an inlet filter with metal filter element. Fasten with non- Riser 61/8"MIN corrosive screws 5. REMOTE MOUNTED BLOWER [15.6 MIN] The blower shall be mounted , up to 100 feet [30.5 meters] maximum, from the HighStrengthFAST unit on a contractor supplied concrete base. The blower must not set in standing water and its elevation must be higher than the normal flood level. A two-piece, rectangular housing shall be provided. The discharge air line from the blower to the HighStrengthFAST System shall be provided Non-corrosive clamp and installed by the contractor. every 2 feet Gasket 6. ELECTRICAL The electrical source should be within 150 feet of the blower. Consult local codes for longer wiring distances. All wiring must conform to code. Input power on 60Hz electrical system is 110/220 2"Air VAC, single phase,•4.6/2.3 amps. Input power on 50Hz electrical systems 230 VAC, single phase 0.616 Kw/hr. 60 Hz three phase 220/460VAC & 50 Hz three phase 190/380 VAC are also available. supply All conduit and wiring shall be supplied by contractor. Line 7. CONTROLS FAST® Lid FAST@ Air Lift The control panel provides power to the blower with an alarms stem consisting of a visual and audible alarm capable of signaling blower circuit failure and high water conditions. The control 2 Coupling panel is equipped ed with SFRO (Sequencing Fixed Reactor timed control feature A manual silence button is included. g g g Vent Option p q pp ( q g ) 8. INSTALLATION AND OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS Alternate Air Supply Option �,������, oFA��s� All work installation and connections of the HighStrengthFAST 1;00 shall be done in accordance with the written instructions provided by the manufacturer and in accordance with all applicable Notes ppY p 411 local codes and regulations. Operations manuals shall be furnished which will include a description of installation, operation, and system maintenance procedures. 1• foot re leg extensione to the FAST@ unit by placing two screws on each side of the leg extension [4 screws per _ . JI 2. Cut 4" 10 schd.4.0 PVC i e not included to obtain the desired height. Minimum pipe length of 6 1/8" 9. FLOW AND DOSING � [ ] P.P ( ) � P P 9 ' FAST systems have been successfully designed, tested and certified receiving gravity, demand-based influent flow. When influent flow is controlled by pump or other means to help with highly [15.56];Original leg extension height requires a pipe length of 11 1/8" [ 8.26]. For hei hts greater then 18" [45.7] " variable flow conditions, then multiple dosing events should be used to help ensure even flow, use schd.80 PVC pipe (not included).Consult factory for extending leg beyond 36 [�91]. DO NOT SCALE EN 3. Anchor the leg extensions to the tankk with non-corrosive hardware not included at the provided mounting .., oints . UNLESS NOTED 10.WARRANTY 4. ncrease minimum tank volume b 20%if minimum le extension is used. ARE IN INCH Bio-Microbics, Inc.warrants all new HighStrengthFAST@ models (HighStrengthFAST@ 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 9.0) against defects in materials and workmanship for a period one (I) year after Y . g ARE ON INCHES installation or eighteen(18) months from date of shipment which ever occurs first, subject to the following terms and conditions: 5. The air supply line into the FAST@ unit must be secured so as to prevent damage from pipe vibration.See all [CENTIMETERS] ,: It CTM0 R'0 R T notes on HS FAST@ 1.00 with lid drawing TOLERANCES During the warranty period, if any,part is defective or fails to perform as specified when operating at design conditions, and if the equipment has been installed and is being operated and 6. The air supply line into the FAST@ unit must be secured to prevent vibration induced damage.The air supply ±0.02 IN/IN HighStrengthFAST 1.00 FAST Unit HIGH STRENGTH maintained in accordance with te written instructions provided by Bio-Microbics, Inc., Bio-Microbics, Inc. will repair or replace at its discretion such defective parts free of charge. Defective parts line should be secured with a non-corrosive clamp every 2 MIN. [±0.05 CM/CM] 7. Tank must be returned b owner to Bio-Microbics, Inc.'s factory postage paid, if so requested. The cost of labor and all other expenses resulting from replacement of the defective parts and from , anchors, piping conduit, blower, housing pad and vents are provided by others. WEIGHT lb SIZE DRAWING NUMBER FAST 1 .0 arts furnished under this warranty installation of and regular maintenance items such as filters or bulbs shall be bome by the owner. This warranty does not cover general system misuse, aerator THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF BIO-MICROBICS INC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A NAME DATE A HSFAST@ 1.00 Details SHEET P warranty WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BIO-MICROBICS INC.IS PROHIBITED.DESIGN AND INVENTION RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.IN THE BIO-MICROBICS @ 2008 DRAWN CTC 2/18/2006 4 OF 4 SEPTIC SYSTEM components which have been damaged by flooding or any components that have been disassembled by unauthorized persons, improperly installed or damaged due to altered or improper INTEREST OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT,ALL PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO DESIGN AND OR MATERIAL CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. CHECKED PF 7/24/2008 REVISEDThursd .Juh/24,2008 REV, INI-02E DESIGN DETAILS wiring or overload protection. This warranty applies only to the treatment plant and does not include any of the house wiring, plumbing, drainage, septic tank or dis osa) system. Blo-Microbics, Inc. is reserves the right to revise, change or modify the g p BIO-MICROBICS INC. SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE PER 310 CMR 15.021 THE FOLLOWING FOR construction and/or design of the FAST system, or any component part or parts thereof, without incurring any obligation to CONSTRUCTION PHASE TASKS ARE REQUIRED: 293 LONG BEACH ROAD make such changes or modifications in present equipment, Bio.Microbics, Inc.is not responsible for consequenfial or incidental DO NOT SCALE ,A FOR THE DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF THE HIGH STRENGTH damages of any nature resulting from such things as, but not limited to, defect m design, material, or workmanship, or delays in 1: P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. AND THE BOARD OF HEALTH FAST 1 0 TREATMENT SYSTEM AND SHALL BE FULLY TO BE NOTIFIED TO OBSERVE THE INITIAL EXCAVATION CENTERVILLE, MA. delivery, replacements or repairs. UNLESS NOTED l °` 4, ' RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION, START-UP, AND PRIOR TO BACKFILLING WITH SAND OR STONE PLACEMENT. DIMENSIONS , SEE SPECIFICATION 8 FOR SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS. PREPARED FOR THIS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. BIO-MICROBICS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY IMPLIED ARE IN INCHES MAINTENANCE, ,MAINTENANCE, , INCLUDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE # WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. [CENTIMETERS] ` ;fw i C O R P a R ATE Q DEP APPROVAL (TRANSMITTAL #W072368). 2: P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC. To BE NOTIFIED TO OBSERVE BYRON & JOYCE HASEOTES NO REPRESENTATIVE OR PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY OTHER WARRANTY OR TO ASSUME FOR BIO-MICROBICS, INC., TOLERANCES THE BACKFILLING OF THE EXCAVATION AND STONE PLACEMENT. 293 LONG BEACH ROAD ANY OTHER LIABILITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF ITS PRODUCTS. Contact your local distributor for parts and service. ±0.02 IN/IN HighStrengthFAST 1.00 FAST Unit 3: P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. AND THE BOARD OF HEALTH CENTERVILLE, MA. 02362 [±0.05 CM/CM] To BE NOTIFIED WHEN THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSTALLED 508-737-2267 WEIGHT lb SIZE DRAWING NUMBER LOCAL SALES REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. P.M.P. TO PERFORM A PIPING/ PREPARED BY SYSTEM COMPONENT AS-BUILT SURVEY AND PREPARE THE THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF BIO-MICROBICS INC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A NAME DATE A HSFAST@ 1.00 Specifications SHEET J 0 H N R 0 LA N D AS-BUILT PLAN. P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BIO-MICROBICS INC.IS PROHIBITED.DESIGN AND INVENTION RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.IN THE BIO-MICROBICS @ 2008 DRAWN CTC 2/18/2006 3 OF 4 508-771 -5570 OR 4: A FINAL TOPOGRAPHIC AS-BUILT IS REQUIRED BY THE BOARD 200 NO. BEDFORD ST., E. BRIDGEWATER, MA INTEREST OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT,ALL PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO DESIGN AND OR MATERIAL CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. CHECKED PF 7/24/2008 REVISED Thursday,July 24,2008 REV. INI-02-E 5 0 8-8 2 3-9 5 6 6 OF HEALTH PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF 508-378-3421 COMPLIANCE. THIS AS-BUILT IS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NO: P007.00 BREAK-OUT REQUIREMENTS ONLY AND DOES NOT REPRESENT DATE: 12/11/08 REVISION: 6/2/09 COMPLETION OF THE SURFACE RESTORATION OR RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR THE COMPLETION OF HIS WORK. ..i. .::....:. .. .. .. r ... .. ...... ..... :-. ..:....... ..,•.,_ ...... ,.:.' ...... .... .. ,.... .. ._ -. ... ... - .. ... .. ..._ ._ . . _ . ., ...., .., -.. .. ._ -, . ...... ....r.. f .. ... .. - ._. .,.... . .... i...... ....... ... - - ----CONC. BND(FND) � NOTL: PLACE HAY BALES THE - WOOD STAKES DEEP OBSERVATION H 0 L # 1 IRON PIPE(FND) - ----� i TWINE IS NOT IN CONTACT WITH THE GROUND. SECTION B ---- --- ---- -- _____-._ _PROJECT BENCHMARK (SEE DETAIL) SOIL EVALUATOR:___-__ PATRICK H. CARRARA Ili DATE:_128107_ s APPROXIMATE LOT LINE. EDGE OF PAVEMENT NAIL SET IN U Z SEE NOTE 1 AND �� ^ EXISTING P SUPPORT NET APPROVING AUTHORITY:-DONALD R. DESMARAISLR.s.__-G.S.EL.-I J O1 V �>r B EL iC �� ROAD DRIVEWAY EL.=7.34 i � SECTION A ELEV. DEPTH HORIZON SOIL TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLING OTHER PLAN REFERENCES (N.G.V.D. DATUM) o EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT TOP VIEW °D DRIVEWAY A - - ------ - 6,39 0-9" Ap SANDY LOAM 10YR2 2 NONE VERY FRIABLE, LAWN ROOTS._f p LIMIT OF ESTUARY --FILTER FABRIC B 5.64 - - - WOOD STAKE , S� N 77'33'55" E CONTRIBUTION ZONE ROW OF DOUBLE 9-17" Bw SANDY LOAM 1OYR4/6 NONE Mp�N \DER eEpCH u 32� 0.01' ! STAKED HAYBALES A FRIABLE, MEDIUM,- �� ON ROAD V� 01 I 4.97 5% PEBBLE GRAVEL R G 150.10 p 15 ( t � �;� y `l TAPE S 77'33'55" V1 111111P,� Tp2 s •:, r ! 61 STRATIFIED FINE TO COARSE SAND, .��R��� .� RESOURCE SHOP E P i 17-85" Cl SAND 2.5Y7/4 RING/�'►D LOOSE, SINGLE, GRAIN GRAVELLY ` PROPOSED �� r - AREA �Q� -0.69 OF 2.5Y4/1 LAYERS, HOLE CAVED IN. DRIVEWAY �, I = .� _ EL- 1.31 r.. (SEE NOTE) N o �,r - ! -j �G k `•' ti�v."' --- - SITE - c�pvN� /I 19.5'x38' t° v „s `� x 0.97 65" OBSEP QED GROUNDWATER (WEEPING & STANDING) E� INFILTRATOR QUICK 4-7 PROPOSED > . , LEACHING FIELD / =c -- BACKFILL IRON PIPES(FND) CONTOUR(TYP.) _ UNDERGROUND . �G� - � \ - _ � ELEC. (SEE NOTE) / S E Re.� OLATI 0 N TEST Tp 1 p Tp4�y uj NATURAL SOIL - ----"- EXISTING � 11 ` --- - SSTIN Sao _ ''- _ ---"__ PERFORMED BY: PATRICK H_CARRARA III DATE- 3/28/07 v • BREAKOUT EL` - Tp 1 I _ _ x PROP-OSEDDRIVEWAY NOTE; ------ GRADE(TYP.) - - - - -- APPROVING AUTHC°�'.lTY:_DONALD R DESMARAIS_R.S._`_ .r VENT _ _ 1g•5'x38' ' THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS TO BE _ --_- INSPECTION FENCE JOINT DETAIL z LIMIT OF ESTUARY D BOX j PORT(TYP.) -- -- -- �__. cP 4 RESERVE AREA �� Y CONSTRUCTED WITH A PERVIOUS SURFACE v TREATMENT. MATERIAL IS TO BE DF -ERMINED. EROSION CONTROL BARRIER DEPTH OF PERC SHE{_F _�4_42" EL= 4 .3_9 LOCUS MAP a CONTRIBUTION ZONE y 5' REMOVE u I o (SEE. LANDSCAPE PLAN.) START PRE-SOAK 9:58 _ CE END PRE-SOAK 10:13___ -- -- - U AND REF A _ 23.6 (TYP) _ SPECIFICATIONS ExtsT' DETAILTIME @ 12" TIME @ 9" _10:01 _ TIME @ 6" �. I 1 ---- ----- DR(WELL ----- -� " I NOT TO SCALE *25 GALLONS, COUL�' NOT MAINTAIN 12"* PERC RATE _ <2 MPI 1. THE COMPLETE SEPTIC SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED t _ I _ - _.. ---- ------------- ------- ---- -- _._ - -- - __..- _ --- F �( IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS 0 310 CMR 15.00 THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE 1 ( 7 ,` `� NOTES : DEEP C B S E R V A T I 0 N HOLE # 2 TITLE V: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUBSURFACE �\ A, DISPOSAL OF SANITARY SEWAGE, AS WELL AS LOCAL, _ 4' r j g I _-2*0 SCH 40 \ 1. THIS PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO ESTABLISH PROPERTY LINES OR - - - - MUNICIPAL, AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THIS PLAN REQUIRES APPROVAL EE NOTE) FMS-SEE PROFILE EXISTING OWNERSHIP OF LAND. IT DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY, SOIL EVALUATOR:_ _•,___ PATRICK H. CARRARA ill ___-_DATE:_3/28/07_ - --- _ I � 2. ALL PIPING SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. __G.S.EL.- _s L� UNDER BARNSTABLE CODE H t15 ---- -- - . GARAGE -- W*' BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, OF THE LOT LINES. APPROVING AUTHOi'ITY:_DONALD R. DESMARA�S�R.S.- ` .z _ ,, SLAB=6.7t N ----- ---------- ------ -- ----- ------ - ----_-_-_-._-_ - 3. SEPTIC TANK, GREASE TRAP & PUMP CHAMBER SHALL p \ (ao) \ 6 c I I o 2. THIS PLAN IS NOT TO BE RECORDED AT A REGISTRY OF DEEDS. BE PRECAST REINFORCED WATERTIGHT CONCRETE (4000 CHAPTER 360, ARTICLE III, _ 44 VENT _ _-- ELEV DEPTH HORIZON SOIL TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLING OTHER . Y, M 3. THIS PLAN MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS IN REGARD TO WETLANDS PSI AT 28 DAYS) WITH SUITABLE WATERTIGHT ACCESS o 4"/ .6.38" 6.19 MANHOLES 20" MIN.) AND PIPE PENETRATION KNOCK- 360-3. - , (3�H 40 _ t6!8 - EXIST. WATER - / EXCEPT AS NOTED HEREON. 552 0--8 Ap SANDY LOAM t0YR2/2 NONE WRY FR�LE LAWN ROOTS. OUTS. HEAVY DUTY (NS-20 WHEEL LOADING) REQUIRED LL7INvs.22 11 / THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN 100 FT. _•r� � I METER- � - _ _ - - _ -__ _--__ WHEN STRUCTURES ARE TO BE LOCATED IN AREAS O o :* '`l S 9 q, > --__�-� ,-1 'A i OF A WETLAND. 5 02 8-14" BW SANDY LOAM IOYR4/6 NONE FRIABLE, MEDIUM, 5% PEBBLE. SUBJECT TO TRAFFIC. BLOWER UNIT.__NOTE: � PORCH / ` EXISTING WATER THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE LOCATED WITHIN A ZONE A. `- --- - -- ----- --- --- THE BLOWER UNIT IS TO BE PLACED ON A �� i / ,� AND GAS SERVICES _ _ SANG MIXED WITH TOP 4. DISTRIBUTION BOX TO BE A PRECAST WATERTIGHT rn - .-FROM PROPOSED � ' NEw 2 •FMs -- 4.35 14-22" f FILL AND SUB SOIL 1 THICK CONCRETE PEDESTAL. THE ELEVATION o 30 5' - - ADolTION INv 6.5!t BASEMENT SEE NOTES 4. THE INSTALLATION OF THE NO AGGREGATE HIGH CAPACITY _ _ STRUCTURE WITH A BAFFLE AND SUFFICIENT PIPE ,� z 2 BEDROOM / ( ) SYSTEM MUST BE DONE BY A PERSON TRAINED BY INFILTRATOR 60` SANE) PENETRATION KNOCKOUTS. ON THE PEDESTAL IS TO BE ABOVE THE FLOOD = .�/ / EL.=3.Oat ; STRATIFIED FINE TO COARSE 5 ADDITION i/ / #293 v t 22- 80" C1 SAND 2.5Y7 4 OF 2.5Y4 t ELEVATION OF 1 1 . " TO BE SET ON PIERS / j � EXIST{NG DWELLING .r I z , SYSTEMS, INC. TO INSTALL THIS TYPE OF LEACHING SYSTEM. / / SAND, LOOSE, SINGLE GRAIN 5. ALL SYSTEM COMPONENTS SHALL BE MARKED WITH F.F.=13.Ot ✓ �� / / u`'� ` -0.47 - ELffi1.19 1 GRAVELLY LAYERS._ MAGNETIC MARKING TAPE OR A COMPARABLE MEANS NEW SEPTIC TANK NOTE: / F.F.=10.74t , / 5. THE INSTALLER MUST FOLLOW THE LATEST SEPTIC SYSTEM » - -- IN ORDER TO LOCATE THEM ONCE BURIED. ' MUST MEET CODE) T.O.F.=8.72t w 0.77 65 OBSERVED GROUNDWATER WEEPING & STANDING THE SECTION JOINTS ON THE NEW SEPTIC TANK ( St.AB _ ^��� ` INSTALLATION MANUAL FOR INFILTRATOR QUICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBERS ( ) x 11 3 �, I Q ------. --- -..- -_-- --_---._--.---_---_-- ---_-- _-_ _ __-_--__-- ---- 6. CAST IRON FAME & COVER WHEN REQUIRED SHALL BE ARE TO BE WRAPPED WITH 6" EASY WRAP OR ,; NO BASEMENT IN MASSACHUSETTS' BY INFILTRATOR SYSTEMS, INC. AS A CONDITION R R EQUIVALENT TO ENSURE THAT THE JOINT IS �� SLAB=8.67t ; EX. 4'0 C.I. j ; FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS LEACHING SYSTEM. MEDIUM DUTY OR HEAVY DUTY FOR TRAFFIC AREAS. I` �`, SLAB �- I DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE # � ALL GONERS AT GRADE SHALL BE PROPERLY SECURED WATER TIGHT. '� '^ , 6. THIS SITE IS NOT LOCATED IN A DEP ZONE 11. SO AS To PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS. PROP. 2000 GAL. ,� REMOVE-..AND.__REPLACE_ NOTE: 2-COMPARTMENT - ; ; 4 54 19 %/�,'x -�-;_ - THE NEW NON EJECTOR ` SOIL EVALUATOR:__•, PATRICKH.S�ARRAf3_A DATE: 3/28/07 7• IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS DESIGN THAT ALL MATERIALS FAST TANK �� / 7. PER 310 CMR 15.229(2)(c) --- - ------- T 1 , AND CONSTRUCTION BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH TITLE V. SHOULD ANY PORTION OF THE EXISTING SYS', '"M BE I i / SUN ROOM - I F`I►MP MUS1 BE EQUIPED WITH A STAND-BY OR A HOOK-UP FOR APPROVING AUTHORITY:_ R. DESMRAIS.,R.S.-__G.S.EL.- _�. _ ANY SUBSTITUTIONS OR DEVIATIONS MUST BE APPROVED DECK ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE AREA OF THE NEVr � t '' � - /,F.F.=9.1 1 t I '`.�,,,� ! A STAND-BY POWER SOURCE. --- -" - -- - PRIOR To INSTALLATION. LEACHING SYSTEM, THE CONTAMINATED SAILS SHALL i I "y 1 ---- --- - ELEV. DEPTH HORIZON SOIL TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLING OTHER BE REMOVED TO A DISTANCE OF 5 Ft, FROM THE _, ,.� - - __ �_ �,,,,,� �/" � �:=-"�_ -��,' -- -------- 8. FILL MATERIAL TO CONFORM WITH THE LATEST T_ _ _ 6.3g REQUIREMENTS OF 310 CMR 15.255. INSTALLER IS {� 0-9 Ap SANDY LOAM t 0YR2 2 NONE VERY FRIABLE LAWN ROOTS.�'T� / FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING A SIEVE ANALYSIS EDGE OF THE NEW LEACHING SYSTEM AND REPLACED �, I „, EXIST. -r- ' SEE SHEET 2 FOR THE INSPECTION REQUIREMENT 5.64 _ - i „ PERFORMED ON THE FILL MATERIALS. A COPY OF THE WITH SAND FILL PER SPECIFICATION NOTE #8 3' RIGHT s ems- CESSPOOL 5.05 9-16 Bw SANDY LOAM 10YR4/6 NONE FRIABLE, MEDIUM, 5X PEBBLE. PLOT OF THE SIEVE ANALYSIS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO OF WAY o (SEE NOTE) SCHEDULE REQUIRED PER 310 CMR 15.021 STRATIFIED FINE TO COARSE THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE BOARD OF HEALTH EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM NOTE: I APPROX. LOC. OF PROP. EROSION I 16-80" C1 SAND 2.5Y7/4 NONE SAND, LOOSE, SINGLE GRAIN PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF THE AS-BUILT DRAWING. THE EXISTING CESSPOOL IS TO BE UNDERGROUND -CONTROL BARRIER -0.27 GRAVELLY LAYERS. PUMPED, CRUSHED, AND BACKFILLED. I OIL TANK (SEE DETAIL) 3 PROP. EROSION -1 9. THE DESIGN IS INTENDED TO MEET THE TITLE V AND (TO BE REMOVED) CONTROL BARRIER 0.39 72 OBSERVED GROUNDWATER (WEEPING & STANDING) OTHER APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. THE PREPARATION 9- ` (SEE DETAIL) OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE SYSTEM GAS SERVICE NOTE: ' ,.. EXISTING STONE- ` PERCOLATION TEST T 3 WILL BE INSTALLED AS DESIGNED, NOR DOES THIS THE EXISTING GAS SERVICE WAS LOCATED FROM i RETAINING WALL p PLAN GUARANTEE THE OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM. DIG SAFE MARKS AND FLAGS. - - - � - - .a 3/28/07 GARBAGE GRINDER NOTE: - PERFORMED BY: .•ATRICK H_CARRARA III DATE:______ p --------- IF THE DWELLING CURRENTLY HAS A GARBAGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC NOTE: zoNlNc sET- _ ______I I APPP, :'VING AUTHO�' T �• DONALD R DESMARAIS, R.S. IaERInFR �' EXISTING FJ _ ---.__ -- -- •------w _...._._.....__ . G � THIS DESIGN REQUtRf:� THAT THE THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WAS LOCATED --15'--I CO TOUR(TYP.) cosTal� BANK BACK LINE(TYP.) i s, DEPTH OF PERC SHEL _ Q=�$_ EL= 3_89 G �` f' �L.T�I}iEVLrL. "R SE R-v%I"tVED PRIOR TO THE FROM DIG SAFE MARKS AND FLAGS. i INSTALLA ION OF THE NEW LEACHING SYSTEM. WATER SERVICE _NOTE: START PRE-SOAK 10.G2 _- END PRE-SOAK 10:17 IF THE GARBAGE GRINDER IS NOT REMOVED, OR THE EXISTING DWELLING IS SERVED BY TOWN WATER. oo T „ ____ IF A NEW GARBAGE GRINDER IS INSTALLED, TIME ® 12" TIME ® 9 10:05_ TIME @ 6 THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE ARE REVOKED AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION IS SHOWN. I I *25 GALLONS, COULD NOT MAINTAIN 12"* PERC RATE _ _<1__ MPI THE DESIGN IS CONSIDERED VOIDED. FINAL GRADING NOTE_ FINAL SITE GRADING SHALL PROVIDE PROPER DEEP O B S E R V A T I O N HOLE # `t' DESIGN CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE LEACHING SYSTEM ZONE At 3 AND THE BUILDING STRUCTURES. C_-_ _ 3/2g/07 DAILY SEWAGE FLOW: SOIL EVALUATOR:_ PATRI K H. CARRARA III _ DATE: 6 BEDROOM @ 1 10 GPD = 660 _ GPD BREAKOUT ELEVATION NOTE: ZONE vt6 APPROVING AUTHORITY:_DONALD R. DESMARAIS, R.S.---G.S.EL.- DESIGN FLOW = _660 _ GPD THE BREAKOUT ELEVATION IS THE TOP OF CHAMBER 5,•, � ` s ELEV. DEPTH HORIZON SOIL TEXTURE COLOR MOTTLING OTHER GARBAGE GRINDER NOT ALLOWED SEE NOTE ELEVATION. THE 15 FT. DISTANCE IS TO BE MEASURED -` -- - - --- - -.- - __ - - _. - - - _ _ _ _ _ ( ) t FROM THE BOTTOM OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE CHAMBERS. - - - - ! '- - - - - - -' - `• -- -- -a 8.15 � FILL - TOPSOIL, SAND FILL ADD 100% TO DESIGN FLOW =__ GPD (PER DEP TRANSMITTAL No. W023699) 6.15 0-2.4" F > TOTAL DESIGN FLOW = 660 GPD ___ _._ __ . 5.40 24-33" Ab SANDY LOAM 1OYR2/2 NONE FRIABLE, BURIED A HORIZON_ SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY: INTERIOR PLUMBING NOTE: - -- -- -_ _ a 4.81 33-40" Bw_ SANDY LOAM 10YR4/6 NONE FRIABLE, MEDIUM, 5% PEBBLE. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: THE INTERIOR PLUMBING IN THE EXISTING DWELLING tr - - APPROX. MEAN HIGH WATER STRATIFIED FINE TO COARSE TOTAL DESIGN FLOW X 200% = 1320 GAL IS TO BE RE-ROUTED TO THE NEW NON-GRINDER '-' _ - - 40-102 Cl SAND 2.5Y7/4 NONE SAND LOOSE, SINGLE GRAIN - EJECTOR PUMP. ALL INTERIOR PLUMBING SHALL TOTAL CAPACITY PROVIDED = _ 2000 GAL -0.35 GRAVELLY LAYERS. MULTIPLE COMPARTMENT TANK FOR CONFORM TO ALL STATE AND LOCAL PLUMBING CODES. --- 1----- --NEW PLUMBIC NOTE: OCEAN LEVEL AT 12:15pm ON 3/30/07 0.65 90" OBSERVED GROUNDWATER (WEEPING & STANDING) HIGH STRENGTH FAST 1.0 THE LENGTH OF THE BUILDING SEWER FROM THE �r'/ BEDROOM COUNT N{; TE: THE NUMBER OF BEDROOM FOR THIS - FIRST COMPARTMENT = SETTELING ZONE: ADDITION TO THE NEW SEPTIC TANK MAY VARY DESIGN IS BASED 0"4 FLOOR PLANS FOR THE EXISTING DWELLING MINIMUM CAPACITY = 500 GAL FROM THE LENGTH SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAPACITY PROVIDED =_750E-_GAL MAINTAIN A MIN. 2% SLOPE TO THE SEPTIC TANK. \ AND FOR THE PROF':)SED ADDITION. SECOND COMPARTMENT - TREATMENT ZONE . EXISTING CONDITIONS/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY: APPROX. MEAN LOW WATER - ' MINIMUM CAPACITY =_750_GAL -_-- - -- - _ 1250E CAI. P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC CAPACfTY PROVIDED -__ 200 NORTH BEDFORD STREET I THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED SOIL_ABSORPTION SYSTEM: EAST BRIDGEWATER, MA. FOR THE PERSON NAMED HEREON ONLY. THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED FOR THE PERC RATE = 3_MPf DESIGN RATE _ <5 MPI EFFLUENT LOADING RATE _ �' LOCAL _BENCHMARK PLAN REFERENCE: _PLAN REFERENCES: F.I.R.M. MAP 250001 0008D ZONING DISTRICT EXISTING LOT & DWELLING (RD) rr SPECIFIC PURPOSE ASSOCIATED WITH THE o�74 GPD/SF PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, A BENCHMARK SHALL BE PLACED COMPILED PLAN OF LAND L.G. PLAN 14594A SEPTIC SYSTEM. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS 660_ GPD / 0_74 GPD/SF = _B92_ SF SYSTEMPLAN RESOURCE PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN 50 TO 75 FT. OF THE LEACHING FACILITY. THE THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN ..•(i��IE.S: 293 LONG BEACH ROAD L.C. PLAN 16179A s IN THE POSSESSION OF ANY OTHER INFILTRATOR QUICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBERS _ d BENCHMARK WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO DISLOCATION OR -- -- - --_ - MIN. LOT AREA = 87,120 SF. MIN. LOT FRONTAGE = 20 FT. LOSS DURING CONSTRUCTION. CENTERVILLE, MA PLAN BOOK 1 12 PAGE 145 A 1 3 100YR FLOOD EL. 1 1 PERSON OTHER THAN THE PERSON NAMED GRAVEL-LESS FIELD/BED CONFIGURATION SCALE 1 = 20 FT BY P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC. PLAN BOOK 161 PAGE 1 V16 100YR. COSTAL FLOOD ZONE EXIST. LOT AREA = 28,750E SF. EXIST. FRONTAGE = 150 FT. �� HEREON OR THEIR AUTHORIZED AGENT, ACTUAL_ AREA - 19.5 FTx38 FT = 741 SF. MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK = 30 . - ASSESSOR'S MAP 185 1 " ` T WAt THEN THE SEAL, SIGNATURE, AND DESIGN PER DEP TRANSMITTAL NUMB R W 3699 DATED: 5/19/08 DEED REFERENCE WITH VELOCITY (WAVE ACTION) EL. 15 MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK = 15 PT. Al � - ,--E--,_ -- - - ---- ------- - LAND LOUT CERT.#58363 MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK = 15 FT. PARCEL 034 f . 4F ARE REVOKED. EFFECTIVE: AREA = 4.72 SF/ Fx228 LF` 1076.2 SF. PROPOSED ADDITION F OR FIN FLOHED R ADES) (MUST MEET CODE) PROVIDE WATER TIGHT INSPECTION 3"0 VENT-- AREA 30,498.8 SF.f '•' - ,� TOTAL AREA 1076.2 SF. > �3Z�F. REQUIRED. ' _ ---- (SEE PLAN FOR FINISHED GRADES) PROVIDE WATER TIGHT & PUMP ACCESS ACCESS COVERS WITH FILTER 7` AT GRADE. FIN. GRADE=9.9± ACCESS COVER AT GRADE IMPORTANT HOMEOWNERS NOTE: INSPECTION PORT (4"0 SCH 40 PVC) 4"0 SCH. 40 SEE SPEC 6 FIN. GRADE=9.tt '- 6 ROWS OF INFILTRATOR TOP OF EXISTING_- PVC BUILDING 4"0 SCH. 40 O INSPECTION PORT (4"0 SCH 40 PVC) THE SEPTIC SYSTEM IS PROVIDED WITH A HIGH- PROVIDE SCREW CAP TO WITHIN- FINISHED GRADE EL=9.4�. SEWER- PVC CLEANOUT (SEE SPEC PROVIDE SCREW CAP TO WITHIN___ 3 OF FINISHED GRADE. PROVIDE SEPTIC SYSTEM FOUNDATION. 8.72t � \ STRENGTH FAST 1 .0 TREATMENT DEVICE. THERE IS A " (SEE PROPOSED GRADING) QUICK 4 STANDARD CHAMBERS (SEE PLAN VIEW) 3" OF FINISHED GRADE. PROVIDESTRICTION 2 INSPECTION PORTS. NOTE: NO AGGREGATE IS USED - - 2 INSPECTION PORTS. ANNDEEUAL E MAINTENANCE ANDREPORTREQUIRED ALONG WITH TOP OF CHAMBER (SEE NOTES 5 & 6) DESIGN PORCH� - �` �- 4,, , , _ - ---_ FIN. GRADE 9.4t _ FILTER FABRIC FIELD EL.= 7.40 GEOTEXTILE VENT WITH .-. FOR 9 MIN 2"/ SCH 40 TO BLOWER (SEE PROPOSED GRADING) t ::'HARCOAL FILTER ----- MAX. SLOPE �--- - _ -_ _ - .�, , 9 LONG ROAD i FT. MIN INVERT 3 FT. MAX �\` A/ H I CENTERVILLE MA . ,. . •- EL.= 7.07 --- ao" ------ --- - ..� ,.- - . 1 VERT , 4"� SCH 40 r AND FILL PER INLET INV. _- � L= t0`5_FT, GEOTEXTILE ,�, 15 FT MIN. DISTANCE "0 SCH 40 FMS EL.= 8.22- L= 24_FT. (SEE HEADER NOTE FILTER FABRIC TOP OF CHAMBERS 1 FT. MIN ; I - SPECIFICATION PREPARED FOR TO 4"0 SCH 40 _ - -- _ S=0.013FT/FT• S=�01_FT FT, ) C EL.= 7.40 3 FT. MAX NOTE #8 (SEE BREAKOUT NOTE) p " _- - FLOW LINE _ _ ---- --LEVEL.F(1R 2 FT- 0 -- _ \ D S 4 0 BUILDING SEWER _ YRON & JUYCE HASEOTE 0 PROVIDE. L=_2Q-FT. " - - - BOTTOM OF CHAMBERS EL 6.40_ to" 1250 GAL± 6" - ------ - --- -{ -- - F - CHECK VALVE _ ( ) TREATMENT _ C E N02362 rn MAINTAIN POSITIVE S-_0.�2_FT./FT. MIN. ,�_ a �.}6» __ 34"._ ` -� 293 LONG BEACH ROAD --34"--- �---6" 34" _ _ BASEMENT UPWARD SLOPE ZONE INLET INN. _ - ,___.� OUTLET INN. ;,� 19.5'(234") --------- - TERVILLE, MA. FLOOR u .. 750 GAL± - __ EL.= 7.33 EL.= 7.16 _� LEACHING _CHAMBER FIELD NOTE: SOS-737-2267 EL. 3.04t '• � SETTLING INLET INN._ _ -_ 6 LAYER _ -1' ------------ -3 6' ------------ - - - --1'- __ NEW INVERT AT ZONE EL.- 7.07 THE INFILTRATOR CHAMBERS ARE TO PREPARED BY O � FOUND.= 6.5t INLET INN. ___- it �� --_------ --- -38' TOTAL BOTTOM OF CHAMBER -- CR. STONE �__-- ( ) __ __ _-__ --_-_ 5 MINIMUM BE BACKFILLED WITH TITLE 5 SAND (SEE INTERIOR EL. 7.87 D BOX �I PLUMBING NOTE) � U BOTTOM OF CHAMBER � w 9 UNITS AND 2 END CAPS PER R(-J - 6 ROWS TOTAL) EL.= 6.40 INSTALLER TO REMOVE & REPLACE 5.0' PROVIDED TO THE LEVEL OF THE TOP OF THE P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC -E SRP SIDE INLET - � 0 TOPSOIL, SUBSOIL OR OTHER UNSUITABLE CHAMBER UNITS. 200 NO. BEDFORD ST., E. BRIDGEWATER, MA 8 urlR CR. STONE 8 OUTLET "D"BOX OR EQUAL. EL.= 6.40 OR IMPERVIOUS SOIL A MINIMUM OF 5 FT 508-378-3421 N EW NON-GRINDER NEW 2000 GAL 200o GAL. 2 COMPARTMENT O SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER EL. 1 .31 T 1 PUMP TO BE WATER TESTED TO Z C LATERALLY IN ALL DIRECTIONS BEYOND THE ( P ) GOULDS GWP 23x30 HIGH STRENGTH SEPTIC TANK SUITABLE FOR OUTLET INV. CONFIRM EQUAL DISTRIBUTION 6 ROWS Of __ _________-_________ SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NO: P007.00 OR EQUAL. THE INSTALLATION OF THE EL.= 7.62 DURING THE AS-BUIILT SURVEY , OUTER PERIMETER OF THE SYSTEM AND DOWN --- - = DATE: 4/27/07 REVISION 1/13/09 (SEE NOTE 7) FAST 1 .0 HIGH STRENGTH FAST 1.0 UNIT 11 �: FILTRATOR QUICK 4 TO THE NATURALLY OCCURRING PERVIOUS DETERMINED BY: ❑ 0 `-ERVATION OF ACTUAL ANNUAL HIGH WATER TABLE �I SEPTIC TANK CHAMBER FIELD HEADER- PIPE NOTE: w STANDARD CHAMBERS MATERIAL AS NOTED WHEN THE FOLLOWING SHEET 1 OF 2 (ESTUARY CONT. ZONE) BOX IS CHECKED. © SEE SPECIFICATION 8. [� SOIL COLOR USING MOTTLING [-] FRIMPTER METHOD REVISION 3/10/09(ADDITION FOOTPRINT) (SEE SHEET 2) THE LENGTHS OF THE HEADER PIPES FROM THE `�' o `- (� SECTION SYSTEM PROFILE SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR INSTALLATION D-BOX TO THE CHAMBER ROWS WILL VARY. �- LD CONFIGURATION REMOVE A AND B HORIZONS AND FILL AS T Y P Q U I C I°� CHAMBER REVISION 3/30/09(MOVE SEPTIC SYSTEM) D - - - INSTRUCTIONS AND DETAILS ALL CHAMBER ROWS ARE TO START AT SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER SHOWN IN SOIL LOGS TO AN APPROXIMATE ---- --- -- -- -- - ------- - -- REVISION: 6/2/09 (REMOVE BR & FRONT DECK) o ( NOT TO SCALE ) THE SAME INVERT ELEVATION (7.07). EL. = 1.31 (Tpt ' r ELEVATION OF 4.st DEPTH VARIES FIELD CONFIGURATION NOT TO SCALE opening Tor I-A,)I NOTES module to sit on tank T-dower piping to FAST@ may not exceed 100 FT [30.5m] total -- ----- - r - --------- ------ --- ----- - ----- - ------- - NOTES glower piping to FASTS may not exceed 100 FT [30.5m] total ---- - -------- ----- 100 FT 30 and consult facto ImB o e�rmust be located above 1900E MIN [30 5 MIN length and use a maximum of 4 elbows in the plpin system (ia, -- --- ------- -- 9 g 500 Gallon MIN z 012` 500 Gallon MIN z -�-� [ ] - ry. [ ] MIN J 100 T [30m]). For distances greater than 100 FT [30m� consult [1900L MIN] f lood/standing water levels on a concrete base 24" X 18" X 1" C z ; facto Blower must be located above flood levels on a 26 5/8 ±1/2 concrete base 24" X 18" X 1" [61 X 45.7 X 2.6cmJ min. o z [61 X45.7X2.6c minimum. ; ; 2� 6 5/ ±1.3] 0o ; 2. Vent to be located above finish grade or higher to avoid t I og ; 2. Vent to be located above finish grade or higher to avoid o infiltration. Ca with vent rate w/at least 9.1 s in. 58.7 s LO infiltration. Cap with a vent grate with at least 9.1 sq in.[58.7 sq. �00 P g q ( q r; ^`- ___ ___________. I 531/4" MIN 54 117' MIN cm] open surface area. Secure with stainless steel screws (see ^`V 9" 54 1 2" MIN cm] open surface area. Secure with stainless steel screws (see -- - �__ [135.3 MIN ) 1-r- [138.4 MIN j sheet 4 of 4 HSFAST@ 0.91,, Details). sheet 4 of 4 HSFASTO 1.00 Details.) ' [1 4.5 1 r ! 1138.4 M:N I _ or or ' Run Vent to desired loccstion and cover opening with a vent 54�' I Run vent to desired location and cover opening with vent � See Note 6 � � a grate with at least 9.1 sq In.[5R.7 sq. cm] open surface area. See Note 6 ac): 11372 1 ; grate w/at least 9.1 s� in. [58.7 sq. cm] of open surface area. 31 114"±1/7' Secure with stainless steel screws. Vent piping must not allow E ; Secure with stainless steel screws. Vent piping must not allow Se`tling; o T [79.5±1.3] ; excess moisture build up or back pressure. ___ _____ 3. All a purtenances to FAST® (e. . tank pump outs, etc.) must a, Zone a) o Settling a W excess moisture build up or back pressure. �-N ' -------------------------L_L----------------------- Zone I I _"______ 3. All appurtenances to FAST® (e.g. tank pum Outs, etc.) must L ------ -- --- - -- Opening for FAST conform to all applicable counTry, state, province, and local ---------- - p ------ ------- conform to all count state, province, and local plumbing59" MIN module to sit in tank plumbing and electrical codes. Blower control system by Bio- . - � _-------- and electrical codes. The blower control system is provided by [149.9 MINI Microbics, Inc. (6.a, Electrical conduit from blower control system to blower/blower housing. Sep, notes l, 3, & 8 --Electrical conduit from blower control system to --- border for sealing Bio-Microbics, Inc. 4. Tank volume must be increased by 20% if minimum of 10 inches blower/blower housing. See notes 1, 3, & 8 and securing the [25.5cm] is used between the unit and the base of tank. 23 718" lid and liner to tank 4. Tank volume must be increased by 20% if minimum of 10 inches 23 7/8" --All plumbing and venting Consult factory for approval. 25.5cm is used between the unit and the base of tank. 160.81 must use water tight gaskets [60.8] All plumbing and venting 3 [ ] - t r See note 7 & 10 5. The primary compartment may be a separate tank. must use water tight gaskets Consult factory for approval. I Inspection/ Pump T " (8]QS MIN Vent i I out Ports - 6. Either the influent pipe tee shall be fitted with a pipe cap or the See note 2 & 8 5. The primary compartment may be a separate tank. ! �" See note 3, 7, & 8 baffle separating the two zones shall be extended all the wa 20 I [�•7] to the to y [50.7 Ports See note 3, 71&t8 �� Joints must be 6. Either the influent pipe tee shall be with a pipe cap or the the baffle hall be at least3" [ ing lh use the pipe cap. Then -- p p �t 3" [8cm)higher than the water level baffle separating he two zones shall be extended to the top of - as shown on the drawincl. /watertight the tank. If choosing to use the pipe cap, then the baffle shall 7. All inspection, viewing and pump out ports must be secured to be at least 3"[8] higher than the water level as shown on the 4" l0)P� prevent ' - - - -- drawing. FAST treated p accidental or unauthorized access. 4'MAX / -- 6 1/4" / _- - Effluent 8. Tank, piping, conduit, blower housing pad and vents are 11.2 m MAX , 7. All inspection, viewingand um Out ports must be secured to [ ] See note 9 provided by others. see note 6 �/ 11�' ' p pump P T 5 0 MIN prevent accidental or unauthorized access Blowe. Piping -3" [810 MIN Vent 2" [5]0 MIN See note 2 - I 9. All piping and ancillary equipment installed after FAST must not =-- - - - 8. Tank, anchors, piping, conduit, blower housing pad and vents ------ - --- - -� _-- impede or restric free flow of effluent. Blower Piping are provided by others. - - -_._ rMIN (41.6 MIN prevent vibration induces FASTS unit must be secured to 16 3/8" MIN 10. The air supply line into th 15 1/8"+1/8" 9. All piping and ancillary equipment installed after FAST® must d damage. The air supply line should XMIN ( i not im ede or restrict free flow of effluent. 17.6M"1 see note 12 be secured with a non-corrosive clamp every 2' min [5cm]. --_--- -- 1 1. Min height may be reduced, consult factory and reference f7.6MIN1 ---- i 4_0.,3 _ -- 10. No more than 4 FT (1 .2 m] of fill may be placed over unit lid. -- - _ �- ----- "Short-FAST-Module-Procedure.pdf"' - ---.- ■1 r Unit F`na stand inside tank see sheet 2 of 4 HS FASTO 1.00 with f1v ®�UIJUOI�iW®��lY T 4 10]0 y ' ( 06 4'MIN a h CMI NI FAT treated feet). Refer to installation manual for more details. �" IIo.2 MIN; ___ 12. Refer to sheet 4 of 4 HSFASTO 1.00 Details drawing for leg m effluent --- Influent hs.z t extensions requirements. ii 115 2 1 _ see note 9 --- ---_. --T. - --- - waste lToa -� _.__� 34 7/8"±1/9' j _�_ ___- _ ___.________ Influent ____L__ - f88.4±0.3 1 DO NOT SCALE � see note 6 _ __ DO NU1 SCALE waste 41 1/4" MIN see note 6 [104.6 MIN i UNLESS NOTED '" _ UNLESS NOTED x TTreatment DIMENSIONS _� � _ DIMENSIONS >- ARE IN INCHES Settling Treatment Zone � tin MIN ARE IN INCHES 10"MIN CENTIMETERS ie5e5 � ___ - € ' Settling - [z5.5MINI [CENTIMETERS] s ° Y See note 5 Zone Zone ��- b lie TO RANGES S] See note 5 Zone see note 4 - - _ .._ 0.02 IN/IN Highs 1.00 FAST Unit - -- - ---- - --- ---- + 0.02 IN/IN _ --- --- + -"" -��-�--- [.s.6 j - Hi hStren, thFAST 1.00 FAST Unit [_0.05 CM/CM] -- (+ 0.05 CM/CM) g g - - -------------- -- --------- - ----- ---___ ._.__. ____ _-. Pie 4engih see t- 1 WEIGHT lb SIZE DRAWING NUMBER H$FAST1.00 Details WEIGHT Ib SIZE DRAWW,NUMBER THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF BIO-MICROBICS INC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A _-NAME DATE SHEET THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING!S THE SOLE PROPERTY OF BI0 MiCROBICS INC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A NAME DAZE WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BIO-MICROBICS INC.IS PROHIBITED.DESIGN AND INVENTION RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.IN THE C A HSFASTO 1.00 with lid - - - A HSFASTCR? 1.00 with feet SHEET Bio-MICROBICS O 2008 DRAWN CTC 2/18i2oo6 1 OF 4 WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OFBIO-MICROBICS INC.IS PROHIBITED.DESIGN AND INVENTION RIGHTS ARE RESERVED IN THE BIO-MICROBICS © 2008 DRAWN CTC 27IB7200d 2 OF 4 INTEREST OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT,ALL PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO DESIGN AND OR MATERIAL CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE - - - ----- INTEREST OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT,ALL PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO DESIGN AND OR MATERIAL CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE ----- -- CHECKED PF 7/24/20DB REVISED fi ,July 24 2006 REV. INI-01-E - _ ���Y-__ � - -- -- -_ ICHECKED Pf 7/ay2ooB v REsED --__ _ -- m'xsdaY.JkAy 24.2008 REV. INi-0I-E Specifications for HighStrengthFAST 1 .00 Wastewater Treatment System Minimum leg extension assembly Nos 6"Grate MIN 9.1 SQ z'Air see note 4 2 screws per Supply l . GENERAL -__4!0side included in[58.7cm SQ] open Line The contractor shall furnish and install (1 Hi hStren thFASTO 1 .00 treatments stem as manufactured b Bio-Microbics, Inc. The treatments stem shall be complete with all needed equipment as surface are" 9 9 Y Y Y PNon-corrosive clamp shown on the drawings and specified herein. every 2 feet The principal items of equipment shall include FAST@ system insert, ie extensions, or lid, blower 7ssembiy, blower controls and alarms. All other items will be provided by others. -� The HighStrengthFASTO 1 .00 unit shall be situated within a 750 Gallone'2800L] minimum compartment or tank as shown on the plans, or in a 1250 gallon [4700L] one compartment tank. Suggested p< maximum settling zone is (1 X) the daily flow. Tanks) must conform to local, state, and all other applicable codes. The contractor shall provide coordination between the FAST system and Tank supplier with regard to fabrication of the tank, installation of the FAST unit and delivery to the job site. Q 2. OPERATING CONDITIONS The HighStrengthFASTO 1 .00 treatment system shall be capable of treating the High strength wastewater produced by commercial facilities producing appropriate waste to develop and sustain a -11 viable biomass. Waste containing inhibitory substances is not recommended for treatment in the FAST system. Consult factory for proper sizing and usage. 3. MEDIA The FAST media shall be manufactured of rigid PVC, polyethylene, or polypropylene and it shall be supported by the polyethylene insert. The media shall be fixed in position and contain no o Riser moving or wearing parts and shall not corrode. The media shall be designed and installed to ensure that sloughed solids descend through the media to the bottom of the septic tank. - _ O 17' MIN --FASTS Air Lift 4. BLOWER - _ i30.5 MIN i The HighStrengthFAST 0.90 unit shall come equipped with a regenerative type blower capable of delivering 20-45 CFM [38-85 m3/hr]. The blower assembly shall include an inlet filter with metal Fasten with non- -Riser filter element. corrosive screws 5. REMOTE MOUNTED BLOWER 1[15.1/6 MIN 6 MIN] The blower shall be mounted , up to 100 feet [30.5 meters] maximum, from the HighStrengthFAST unit on a contractor supplied concrete base. The blower must not set in standing water and its elevation must be higher than the normal flood level. A two-piece, rectangular housing shall be provided. The discharge air line from the blower to the HighStrength FAST System shall be provided Non-corrosive clamp and installed by the contractor, every 2 feet _ --Gasket 6. ELECTRICAL The electrical source should be within 150 feet of the blower. Consult local codes for longer wiring distances. All wiring must conform to code. Input power on 60Hz electrical SyStE'm is 110/220 7'Air VAC, single phase, 4.6/2.3 amps. Input power on 50Hz electrical systems 230 VAC, single phase 0.616 Kw/hr. 60 Hz three phase 220/460VAC & 50 Hz three phase 190/380 VAC are also available. ' -- - Supply All conduit and wiring shall be supplied by contractor. Line 7. CONTROLS FASTO Lid FAST®Air Lift - The control panel provides power to the blower with an alarm system consisting of a visual and audible alarm capable of signaling blower circuit failure and high water conditions. The control _ -7'Coupling panel is equipped with SFRO (Sequencing Fixed Reactor) timed control feature. A manual silence button is included. _ Vent Option 8. INSTALLATION AND OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS \-__ Alternate Air Supply Option All work installation and connections of the HighStrengthFAST 1 .00 shall be done in accordance with the written instructions provided by the manufacturer and in accordance with all applicable Notes - local codes and regulations. Operations manuals shall be fumished which will include a description of installation, operation, and system maintenance procedures. 1. Secure leg extension to the FAST@ unit by placing two screws on each side of the leg extension (4 screws per foot are included). 9. FLOW AND DOSING 2. Cut 4" [10] schd. 40 PVC pipe (not included) to obtain the desired height. Minimum pipe length of 6 1/8" tow FAST systems have been successfully designed, tested and certified receiving gravity, demand-based influent flow. When influent flow is controlled by pump or other means to help with highly [15.561; Original leg extension height requires a pipe length of 11 1/8" (28.26]. For hei�he hts greater then 18" [45.71 " variable flow conditions, then multiple dosing events should be used to help ensure even flow. use schd. 0 PVC pipe (not included►. Consult factory for extending leg beyond 36" 1 J. DO NOT SCALE r 1 O.WARRANTY 3. Anchor the leg extensions to the tank with non-corrosive hardware not included at provided mounting points . UNLESS NOTED Bio-Microbics, Inc. warrants all new Hi hStren thFAST@ models Hi hStren thFAST@ 1 .0, 1 .5, 3.0, 4.5, and 9.0 against defects in materials and workmanship for period one 1 4. Increase minimum tank volume by 20%if minimum leg extension is used. DIMEMSIONS g 9 9 g ) 9 p p ( ) year after ARE IN ;NCHES installation or eighteen(18) months from date of shipment which ever occurs first, subject to the following terms and conditions: 5. The air supply line Into the FAST@ unit must be secured so as to prevent damage from pipe vibration. See all [CENTIMETERS] notes on HS FAST@ 1.00 with lid drawing Durin the warranty TOLERANCES g ty period, if any part is defective or fails to perform as specified when operating at design conditions, and if the equipment has been installed and is being operated and 6. The air supply line into the FASTS unit must be secured to prevent vibration induced damage. The air supply ±0.02 IN/IN maintained in accordance with the written instructions provided b Bio-Microbics, Inc., Bio-Microbics, line should be secured with a non-corrosive clam HighStrengthFAST l.00 FAST Unit HIGH STRENGTH I p y Inc. will repair or replace at its discretion such defective parts free of charge. Defective parts p every 2' MIN. (±o.oscM/cM] ` . must be returned b owner to Bio-Microbics, Inc.'s facto postage aid, if so requested. The cost of labor and all other expenses resulting from replacement of the defective arts and from 7. Tank, anchors, piping conduit, blower, housing pad and vents are provided by others. -- ----- rY P P q P 9 P P 9 WEIGHT lb SIZE DRAW NUMBER FAST 1 . 0 installation of parts furnished under this warranty and regular maintenance items such as filters or bulbs shall be borne by the owner. This warranty does not cover general system misuse, aerator THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF BIO-MICROBICS INC ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A NAME DATE A SHEET WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BIO MICROBICS INC IS PROHIBITED.DESIGN AND INVENTION RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.IN THE e HSFASTS 1.00 Details SEPTIC SYSTEM components which have been damaged by flooding or any components that have been disassembled by unauthorized persons, improperly installed or damaged due to altered or improper INTEREST OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT,All PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO DESIGN AND OR MATERIAL CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE BIO-MICROBICS O 2" DRAWN CIC 2/Ie/2006 _ 4 OF 4 wine or overload protection. This warrant applies only to the treatment plant and does not include an of the house wiring, CHECKED FF 7/24/20M REVISED J 24.2008 REV IMM-E gg P y PP Y P Y g, - -�__.-' -- ____-- ___-_ __-_--_ -- - _ -___-- _ - --_-_ ---_..-- _ DESIGNplumbin , drainage, septic tank or disposal system. Bio-Microbics, Inc. is reserves the right to revise, change or modify the DETAILS construction and/or design of the FAST system, or any component part or parts thereof, without incurring any obligation to --- ----- ---------- - - B I 0- MICR 0 B I C S, INC. SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE PER 310 CMR 15.021 THE FOLLOWING FOR make such changes or modifications in present equipment. Bio-Microbics, Inc. is not responsible for consequential or incidental DO NOT SCALE FOR THE DESIGN AND FABRICATION R I C AT I 0 N 0 F THE HIGH STRENGTH CONSTRUCTION PHASE TASKS ARE REQUIRED: 293 LONG BEACH ROAD - -------- - -------- damages of any nature resulting from such things as, but not limited to, defect in design, material, or workmanship, or delays in 1 : P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. AND THE BOARD of HEALTH delivery, replacements or repairs. UNLESS NOTED > FAST 1 .0 TREATMENT SYSTEM AND SHALL BE FULLY To BE NOTIFIED To OBSERVE THE INITIAL EXCAVATION CENTERVILLE , MA. DIMENSIONS r RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION START- UP' AND PRIOR TO BACK-ILLING WITH SAND OR STONE PLACEMENT. THIS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. 610-MICROBICS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY IMPLIED ARE IN INCHES T ' COMPLIANCE WITH WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. [CENTIMETERS] MAINTENANCE, INCLUDING COMPLTH THE SEE SPECIFICAT ON #8 FOR SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS. PREPARED FOR DAP APPROVAL (TRANSMITTAL # IANCE W 2: P.M.P. ASSOCIA''ES, L.L.C. TO BE NOTIFIED To OBSERVE BYRON & JOYCE HASEOTES NO REPRESENTATIVE OR PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY OTHER WARRANTY OR TO ASSUME FOR BIO-MICROBICS, INC., TOLERANCES THE BACKFILLING OF THE EXCAVATION AND STONE PLACEMENT. 293 LONG BEACH ROAD ANY OTHER LIABILITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF ITS PRODUCTS. Contact your local distributor for parts and service. ± 0.02 IN/IN HighStrength FAST 1 .00 FAST Unit 3: P.M.P. ASSOCIATES, LLC. AND THE BOARD OF HEALTH CENTERVILLE, MA. 02362 (± 0.05CM/CM1 TO BE NOTIFIED WHEN THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSTALLED I 508-737-2267 _ - - - LOCAL SALES REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. P.M.P. TO PERFORM A PIPING/ WEIGHT Ib SIZE DRAWING NUMBER SYSTEM COMPONENT AS-BUILT SURVEY AND PREPARE THE PREPARED BY THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF BIO-MICROBICS INC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A _ NAME DATE SHEET J 0 H N R O LA N D AS-BUILT PLAN. P.M . P. ASSOCIATES, LLC WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BIO-MICROBICS INC. IS PROHIBITED. DESIGN AND INVENTION RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. IN THE C A HSFASTO 1 .00 Specifications INTEREST OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT, ALL PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO DESIGN AND OR MATERIAL CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. BIO-MICROBICS O 2008 DRAWN CTC 2/1Bi2oo6 __- 3 OF 4 508-7 71 -5570 OR 4: A FINAL TOPOGRAPHIC AS-BUILT IS REQUIRED BY THE BOARD 200 NO. BEDFORD ST., E. BRIDGEWATER, MA CHECKED PF 7/24/2008 REVISED Thursday,July 24,2008 LREV. INI-02-E 508-823-9566 OF HEALTH PRI!)R TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF 508-378-3421 COMPLIANCE. THIS AS--BUILT IS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NO: P007.00 BREAK-OUT REQUIREMENTS ONLY AND DOES NOT REPRESENT DATE: 12/11/08 REVISION: 6/2/09 COMPLETION OF THE SURFACE RESTORATION OR RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR THE COMPLETION OF HIS WORK.