HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-3-28 - Planning Board Draft Mins 1
Board Members
Steven Costello – Chair Stephen Robichaud – Vice Chair Mary Barry - Clerk Robert Twiss Michael Mecenas Raymond Sexton Tim O’Neill
Mathew Levesque – Town Council Liaison
Planning & Development Dept. Staff Support
Elizabeth Jenkins, AICP, Director
Kaitlyn Maldonado, Assistant Director
James Kupfer, AICP, Senior Planner
Karen Herrand – Principal Assistant - karen.herrand@town.barnstable.ma.us
Town of Barnstable
PLANNING BOARD
Minutes
March 28, 2022
Steven Costello – Chairman Absent
Stephen Robichaud – Vice Chairman Present
Mary Barry – Clerk Present
Robert Twiss Present
Michael Mecenas Present
Raymond Sexton Present
Tim O’Neill Absent
Also in attendance via remote participation were Planning & Development Staff; Elizabeth Jenkins, Director,
Kaitlyn Maldonado, Assistant Director, James Kupfer, Senior Planner, and Karen Herrand, Principal Assistant.
The Planning Board’s Public Hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. by remote participation methods.
Alternative public access to this meeting shall be provided in the following manner:
1. The meeting will be televised via Channel 18 and may be viewed via the Channel 18 website at
http://streaming85.townofbarnstable.us/CablecastPublicSite/
2. Real-time access to the Planning Board meeting is available utilizing the Zoom link or telephone
number and Meeting ID provided below. Public comment can be addressed to the Planning Board by
utilizing the Zoom link or telephone number and Meeting ID provided below:
Link: https://zoom.us/j/97152590063
Phone: 888 475 4499 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 971 5259 0063
3. Applicants, their representatives and individuals required or entitled to appear before the Planning
Board may appear remotely and may participate through the link or telephone number provided above.
Documentary exhibits and/or visual presentations should be submitted in advance of the meeting so
that they may be displayed for remote public access viewing.
Application materials may be accessed by contacting Karen.herrand@town.barnstable.ma.us or calling
508-862-4064.
Call to Order Introduction of Board Members and Staff Members
Attendance Roll Call
Town of Barnstable
www.town.barnstable.ma.us/PlanningBoard
2
Stephen Robichaud
Mary Barry
Bob Twiss
Michael Mecenas
Ray Sexton
Notice of Recording This meeting is being recorded and broadcast on Channel 18 and in accordance
with MGL Chapter 30A §20. The Chair must inquire whether anyone else is taping this meeting and to
please make their presence known.
Public Comment – General Public Comment - None
Zoning Amendments:
Zoning Amendment TC item No. 2022-134 – Proposal to Amend Chapter 240 Zoning Article XIV, Citizens
Petition to Establish a Temporary Moratorium on Large Scale Ground Mounted Solar Photovaltaic
Systems - The purpose of this public hearing is to take comment on a citizens petition proposal to add a
new section §240-129.2 establishing a temporary moratorium on Large Scale Ground Mounted Solar
Photovoltaic Systems, as defined, for a period of eleven and one half months. This amendment is a
petition made by ten certified registered voters of the Town and was referred to the Planning Board for
a public hearing by Town Council Item No. 2022-134. (Public Hearing) (Majority of members present and
voting for recommendation to Town Council)
Acting Chair/Vice Chair Stephen Robichaud entertains a motion to open the public hearing, moved by
Mary Barry, seconded by Michael Mecenas,
Roll Call vote
Mary Barry - aye
Bob Twiss - aye
Michael Mecenas – aye
Ray Sexton - aye
Stephen Robichaud - aye
Anne Salas in attendance. Reads from her email as sent today, Exhibit A. Attorney General article, if
finds in violation, unreasonably restriction but passes the rest of the zoning amendment, in residential
zone. This would mean that batteries could be placed in residential zones. Urge to vote in favor until
this bill to pass and become law. Allows municipalities to reasonably regulate solar/and installations to
not be put in residential zones, and not endanger our water systems.
Ray Sexton directs to Anne Salas, municipalities or towns would be empowered or declined to approve
large photovoltaic arrays – would be an adjustment to the existing law, is this what states?
Anne Salas reads into record: “No zoning ordinance or by-law shall prohibit or unreasonably regulate
the installation of solar energy systems or the building of structures that facilitate the collection of solar
energy for residential purposes except where necessary to protect the public health, safety or
welfare. Commercial, governmental, and non-residential solar energy structures and systems may be
reasonably regulated for purposes of (i) protecting public health, safety and welfare; (ii) preserving
forested lands, agricultural lands, or wetlands; or (iii) ensuring compatibility with municipal zoning."
Nancy Minegrove, Marstons Mills, reiterate concerns and a lot to learn about this, particular large
commercial scale projects. Urge to vote to pass moratorium.
Ray Sexton – what do Town Attorney’s have to say.
Jim Kupfer refers to letter/memorandum from Town Attorney, Exhibit B. Requirements to uphold a
moratorium. In review of petition article and certain time, beyond 11 month time frame. Doesn’t quite
3
define what the action would be/task to finalize the moratorium or study test. Will keep our eye on
legislation. Reasonable time and study action. Town attorney has recommended not recommending this
to Town Council.
Ray Sexton, based on case law, the moratorium may be struck down in court. Concerned that bar set a
little low.
Anne Salas – refers to item B from Petition moratorium - no building permit for any large scale - in size
of more than 150 percent. Any property not to exceed 35 kilowatts. That doesn’t take away from any
homeowner/business/municipal bldg. Has had attorney review this petition as well. Only duration is
11.5 months.
Jim Kupfer replies, 11.5 months after, or until sufficient deliberation by the Town. Definition – while
another community may have a definition, significantly different. 35 kilowatts does bring it to a
residential scale.
Anne Salas, thinks we need some time without the pressure of a lawsuit to write our zoning by laws.
Shows a copy of a map and points out where her home is located. Cancer study, found 70 percent
greater risk of leukemia with children living within 160 ft. of power lines. Electromagnetic – shouldn’t be
in residential zones. This moratorium is to buy us time to work on a zoning amendment that protects
people and natural resources. Once passed a residential zone to be a solar overlay district that opens
the doors for others.
Vice Chair Stephen Robichaud wants all to remember that no project will go forth without a special
permit process being involved.
Mary Barry doesn’t like to have a lot of special permits. Would like zoning done before review of special
permits. Will support a moratorium that has the right language to support it.
Bob Twiss, the Board has spent a lot of time looking at this. Trying to improve and update and put in
protections for. Provisions have been put in. Notice for hazardous substances. Set backs have been
increased and prohibits the use of batteries. These issues have been raised repeatedly through the
various hearings. The proposed moratorium does not ask for amended ordinance, only on special
permits or modifications of the zoning map/overlay. If there were an 11.5 month moratorium what
would happen in that time? Or if adopt, we would be in same position 11.5 months from now. Civil
suits does not involve the Planning Board, this is not our role. Doesn’t see any reason to impose a
moratorium.
Vice Chair Stephen Robichaud agrees we have done a lot of work with this.
Michael Mecenas agrees – have spent a lot of time and done their own research. Appreciates the
concerns of the abutters.
Ray Sexton, his concern is the specific site. Think we have the ordinance right. What would 11.5 months
do and what have we missed.
Anne Salas replies, the moratorium does refer to restriction on overlay district, no ground mounted may
be adopted for 11.5 months after the approval of said moratorium. Concerns with industrial scale solar
plants within a residential zone. Still creating massive amounts of electricity, near well head protection.
When panels taken apart they break and toxic chemicals will go into the ground. Where are we going to
put these in 20 years? What will be done with them, this will be a massive problem. This moratorium
does address – residential zone overlay districts should not be.
4
Vice Chair Stephen Robichaud, agrees Staff and Board have spent a lot of time. He feels they have it
right. Solar has been in use for three decades. Thinks Board has addressed well.
Anne Salas thanks the Board for all the work done. This is so very serious and to protect in the special
permitting process.
Vice Chair Stephen Robichaud entertains a motion to close the public hearing, moved by Mary Barry,
seconded by Michael Mecenas,
Roll Call Vote:
Mary Barry - aye
Bob Twiss - aye
Michael Mecenas - aye
Ray Sexton - aye
Stephen Robichaud - aye
Vice Chair Stephen Robichaud entertains a motion, moved by Ray Sexton that the Planning Board not
recommend the Petition as written to be adopted, accepted or enacted for Town Council Item No.
2022-134, seconded by Bob Twiss,
Roll Call Vote:
Mary Barry - aye
Bob Twiss - aye
Michael Mecenas - aye
Ray Sexton - aye
Stephen Robichaud - aye
Anne Salas would like a copy of the memorandum from Legal Dept in order to address.
Jim Kupfer replies – this is posted on the website.
Regulatory Agreements:
Regulatory Agreement RA – 001 - Flagship Estates Hyannis LLC
To determine if the proposed amendment to eliminate the construction of Building E and install a
parking lot in its place, and reduce the overall number of units from 29 to 24, thereby reducing the
corresponding number of affordable units required by the Town’s Inclusionary Affordable Housing
Ordinance, Chapter 9 of the Barnstable Code, from 3 to 2 affordable units qualifies as a minor
amendment or a substantial amendment in accordance with §168-5D. (Majority of members present
and voting) Jim Kupfer, this is where we need Board’s review if think a minor or major modification.
Application - would like to continue to April 11th, 2022.
Paula Schnepp in attendance, asks if considered a minor amendment, then won’t go to Town Council,
but if major yes, would have to go ?
Jim Kupfer, yes, if major would have public comment and a public meeting, then to Town Council and to
Town Manager.
Staff Updates
Local Comprehensive Plan - Elizabeth Jenkins - no additional updates at this time.
Matters Not Reasonably Anticipated by the Chair
Correspondence
Chapter 91 Notice – 18 Sail-A-Way – Curley – Dock
Approval of Minutes
March 14, 2022, draft minutes
5
Vice Chair Stephen Robichaud entertains a motion to approve the draft minutes of March 14, 2022,
moved by Mary Barry, seconded by Ray Sexton,
Roll Call Vote:
Mary Barry - aye
Bob Twiss - aye
Michael Mecenas - aye
Ray Sexton - aye
Stephen Robichaud - aye
Future Meetings: April 11th and April 25, 2022, @ 7:00 p.m.
Adjournment
Vice Chair Stephen Robichaud entertains a motion to adjourn, moved by Bob Twiss, seconded by
Mary Barry,
Roll Call Vote:
Mary Barry - aye
Bob Twiss - aye
Michael Mecenas - aye
Ray Sexton - aye
Stephen Robichaud - aye
The meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted
Karen Herrand, Principal Assistant, Planning & Development
Further detail may be obtained by viewing the video via Channel 18 on demand at
http://www.town.barnstable.ma.us
List of Exhibit Documents
Exhibit A – Zoning Amendment TC item No. 2022-134 – Proposal to Amend Chapter 240 Zoning
Article XIV, Citizens Petition to Establish a Temporary Moratorium on Large Scale Ground
Mounted Solar Photovaltaic.. – email from Anne Salas, March 28, 2022
Exhibit B - – Zoning Amendment TC item No. 2022-134 - Memorandum from Town Attorney-
ZA