Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0033 BROOKS ROAD - Health
33 BROOKS RD., HYANNIS ° ° k I c P ° ° o Y ° ° Address: 33 AND 51 BROOKS ROAD, HYANNIS REPORTS BY: BENNETT ENVIRONMENT ASSOCIATES VARIOUS REPORTS ON RELEASE PHASE V. STATUS REPORT TO MAINTAIN REMEDY OPERATIONS STATUS WITH REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT RTN 4-0824 (Linked to RTN 4-15370) • APRIL 2008 - OCTOBER 2008 • SEPTEMBER 2009 DOCUMENTS IN STORAGE BOX # 41 CPMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTIONS PHASE IV REMEDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION THIS IS LOCATED IN THE BACK ROOM FILING CABINET FOR THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY: 33 & 51 BROOKS ROAD HYANNIS MA Above round rSto\ra' Ag- a T' nk Closure . � g � _ �a C osure i Assessment o Former Hubbard Oil Co. f 33=Brooks, Road ��, i Hyannis Massachusetts ��m IIu J November 14,.2016 1 Z/ - LL= Prepared For: /77 Mr'Darren-Johnson' Robert B.,Our, Co. Inc. 24 Great We'stern'Road (� , P.O. 136x'1539 Harwic_h;,Massachusetts;02645 r-\ Preiiared'B :� C' Green Seal Environmental, Inc. 114,State Road, Building'B '•%Sagam`ore Beach, Massachusetts 02562 4 ' GSE Project Number.RBOC-1602-0001 ' J Providing Innovative Solutions For: �J\P�NM f,�T9 Solid Waste Management • Survey&Land Development i GREEN . Hazardous Waste • Civil Engineering w SEAL a yi, ,�, Environmental Services • Construction Management ADb�a� Facilities Management • Wetland Restoration 114 State Road,Building B,Sagamore Beach,MA 02562 1 Tel:(508)888-6034 Fax:(508)888-1506 1 www.gseenv.com \PONMFN T z GREEN cr, SEAL 1997 N�•A'CI November 14, 2016 ' Mr.Darren Johnson ROBERT B.OUR,CO.INC. 24 Great Western Road ' P.O. Box 1539 Harwich,MA 02645 RE: Aboveground Storage Tank Closure Assessment Reported 106,000-gallon Fuel Oil Aboveground Storage Tank Former Hubbard Oil Company, Inc. ' 33 Brooks Road; Hyannis, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Johnson, ' At your request,Green Seal Environmental Inc.(GSE)has prepared this summary letter describing the assessment activities completed as part of the removal of a 106,000-gallon fuel oil aboveground ' storage tank(AST) system at the above referenced location(the Site)on October 18, 2016. The tank was removed as scrap metal by Robert B.Our Co.,Inc(Our Co.).GSE was contracted by Our ' Co. to conduct the environmental assessment following removal of the AST bottom. The assessment was completed to confirm that the tank did not leak and contribute to existing petroleum soil and groundwater contamination at the Site. According to files maintained by the Massachusetts ' Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP), a historical release of petroleum to soil and groundwater has occurred at the Site and is currently in Phase V of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan(MCP)with Release Tracking Number(RTN)4-00824. A site locus and site plan along with photographic documentation of the tank closure and laboratory analytical results are attached as part of this report. ' Site Information ' The Site is the former Hubbard Oil Company facility located along Brooks Road in Hyannis,MA. The AST was located on native soils along the southeast bounds of the Site. The Site is bound to the north by parking for New Colony Oil, to the south by Mary Dunn Way and wooded land, to the east by ' wooded land and rail line and to the west by Brooks Road with the Barnstable Municipal Airport beyond. GSE,INC. 1 114 STATE ROAD,BLDG.B,SAGAMORE BEACH,MA 02562 I T:508-888-6034 F:508-888-1506 I \aoNMFro Est. T9( ' z GREEN c SEAL ' According to the MassDEP 21E Resources Priority Map, the Site appear to be within a designated Non-Potential Drinking Water Source Area(NPDWSA). The Site is also depicted within a MassDEP ' Approved Wellhead Protection Area(Zone II)which contains three Public Water Supply(PWS)wells. Tank Closure Assessment ' Prior to October 18, 2016, Our Co. removed associated above ground lines and the majority of the AST to the base of the former tank. On October 18,2016,GSE observed the base of the former tank in-situ. The base was removed allowing the visual assessment and collection of soils. Following the removal of the tank base,GSE scanned soils for Total Organic Vapors(TOVs)with a ' MiniRAE Model 3000 Photoionization Detector(PID). Prior to field screening soils samples,the PID was calibrated to 100 parts per million by volume (ppmv) with isobutylene span gas which was referenced to benzene. Native soils at the tank base consisted of brown medium and coarse sand with traces of gravel. GSE observed no visual or olfactory evidence of petroleum staining or odors present on soils beneath the ' tank base. Furthermore,no detectable concentrations of TOVs were recorded. GSE collected two composite samples from soils beneath the tank base and from soils just above the ' exterior wall of the tank grave. The tank base grave was halved (north and south) with 12-grab locations chosen from each half for two submitted composite confirmatory samples. Confirmatory samples were submitted to ESS Laboratories in Cranston, Rhode Island for MassDEP Volatile ' Petroleum Hydrocarbons(VPH) and Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) analyses. Laboratory Analytical Results ' The sample collected from the Northern portion of the tank base (TANK-B-NORTH 0-6")reported EPH fractions C9-Cl8 Aliphatics,C19-C36 Aliphatics and C11-C22 Aromatics at concentrations well below applicable MassDEP Reportable Concentrations for category RCS-1. The Northern sample reported EPH Target Analytes and VPH Fractions and anlalytes as "not-detected". The sample collected from the Southern portion of the tank base (TANK-B-SOUTH 0-6") reported EPH Fraction C 19-C36 Aliphatics and VPH fraction C9-C 12 Aliphatics at concentrations well below the applicable Reportable Concentrations. The Southern sample reported all other EPH and VPH ' fractions and target analytes as "not-detected". A copy of the analytical report as well as table 2 t GSE,INC. 1 114 STATE ROAD,BLDG.B,SAGAMORE BEACH,MA 02562 1 T:508-888-6034 F:508-888-1506 ,�PONIv�FNp z GREEN cc w. SEAL z m y.� 1997 ' summarizing data are included as Attachments to this report. ' Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the soil screening results and visual observations during the assessment,GSE opines that no ' release has occurred from the former tank that poses risk to human health and the environment, and thus recommends no further action related to the AST removal at this location. ' Sincerely, GREEN SEAL ENVIRONMENTAL,INC. rRichard P. Geisler, LSP, PG Vice President of Environmental Services ' Attachments: Figures Photographs ' Analytical Summary Table Laboratory Report t 3 GSE,INC. 1 114 STATE ROAD,BLDG.B,SAGAMORE BEACH,MA 02562 T:508-888-6034 F:508-888-1506 1 1 1 1 ATTACHMENT 1 r rFIGURES ' 1 r r r . i r ONMfNr �� Est, 9!• z GREEN c SEAL Zito 1997 r .• .T' UA �a. 0 Ab • tis ' • o✓. x ater o 70 •• x Pe[A B - -0 •• .r. , off J�l"�--� •• x `'I ' --"ems � • _. -_ o +. ► t3 + ST r 70 o Ca , Ho _ FIreSt f . f CI �1 —40 Ni • ♦ `-` �• v % • • ' its. o IT 1 IMAGE SOURCE:USGS IMAGE SOURCE:USGS MassGIS OLIVER USGS HYANNIS,MA(2015) i Green Seal Environmental,Inc. PROJECT NAME: DRAWING TITLE: DATE: 114 State Road,Building B ay4"r°Y " Sagamore Beach,MA 02562 Aboveground Storage Figure 1:Site Locus November 14,2016 GREEN t Tank(AST)Removal ' W SEAL Tel:(508)888-6034 m Fax:(508)888-1506 LOCATION: SITE COORDINATES: PROJECT ID: www.gseenv.com 33 Brooks Road, Latitude: 41.662249 RBOC-1602 ' Hyannis,MA Longitude: -70.275578 FassDEP Phase 1 Site Assessment Map http://maps.massgis.state.ma.us/images/dep/mcp/mcp.htm ' MassDEP - Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Phase 1 Site Assessment Map: 500 feet & 0.5 Mile Radii The information shown is the best available at the Site Information: date of printing.However,it may be incomplete.The M a S S D E P 33 BROOKS ROAD responsible party and LSP are ultimately 33 BROOKS ROAD HYANNIS,MA responsible for ascertaining the true conditions surrounding the site.Metadata for data layers tnmo�eetndna�.e.os 4613051TM Meters: shown on this map can be found at: Department at Environmental Protection November mE(Z.one:19) hip://vwwnimass.g0v/mais/. November 11,2016 r � + r m tt ti 1 'AIaPO IT ItOA ► i ► a 11_ I ;' t I t I f t t o 1 t -iQG �p yy yy IX N I I � t I � � 1 I i I l I j A .", ��. I.3 .� i i �Av uttcot.a•n ,- t Y s ', i . ► � � 1 I �, 1 i i s I t �I t ; 1 L:�r. � s �{} \K4I t I , ► 4. 1 1 �� I 1 I I = i Flee j �� I � I + I t � 1 I I 1 s\ b I '�• l I I M ! 1 � � j(p .Gk i E < , ' t � � d i� a' � i � � �" A 02 2 �� �. i t 1� •� 1 eaoatEastateErt j ��j # s�1 �• stPEe1 t °� t I \ t 1 � �iC- �H • andC i bda �� I `# S_ P. a1 r I t a+T A y % 5EAG.S WAY ra l P '.F• EuMD WAY I' i HYA NNI$ l ` 3 4-j�a .� j �: '..:•_` Sr � ' tFsaa� . s y 500 m Sat Is 1000ft T � 3 t I t 4 / r f v�' R°SET'A 9`?NEE •,�t��� at— bi Cwmm it Colla M aAobE Roads:Limited Access,Divided,Other Hwy,Major Road,Minor Road,Track Trail PWS Protection Areas:Zone II,IWPA,Zone A............®® Boundaries:Town,County,DEP Region;Train;Powerline;Pipeline;Aqueduct Hydrography:Open Water,PWS Reservoir,Tidal Flat..... ' ----• — — Wetlands:Freshwater,Saltwater,Cranberry Bog.........0 0 Basins:Major,P WS; Streams:Perennial,Intermittent,Man Made Shore,Dam FEMA 100yr Floodplain;Protected Open Space;ACEC.... Aquifers:Medium Yield,High Yield,EPA Sole Source......=0 � � Est Rare Wetland Wildlife Hab;Vemal Pool:Cart.,Potential WJ ' Non Potential Drinking Water Source Area:Medium,High(Yield) Solid Waste Landfill;PWS:ComGW,SW,Emerg,Non-Com® ©© of 1 11/t1/2016 10:03 AM r r 1 1 r ATTACHMENT 2 r iPHOTOGRAPHS i r 1 1 r 1 r 1 ONMfNT z GREEN 9 SEAL 1997 r r I4 Y h }' gyp _} ,. 'tft a' 3 ATA� k ♦ 3 ;' i 4y2 " � a ��k+�5fj i• '+g Heys � " " ,' {� ?� ki Ile a �VII{J t � /� w;� A 7 •a t j t d1 I � ry S d . 3 _ 9� •fir A '�''l— � r t� � t14 � ��'. !: •aa 1 1L� ti L L -Al Q Q a� .�k Hit j ,, '•� O f¢' O { k R CA (f � _.� s •1 '�' aw t �' A � } M cpa • �� �, Ito T _ € # ��lJr a y 6 G F i i ATTACHMENT 3 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY TABLE ONA4 At Z GREEN � a:, 2,tJ 1997 1AO Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results:AST Removal 33 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA Collected October 18,2016 Sample Identification: TANK-B-NORTH(0-6") TANK-B-SOUTH(0-6") MCP RCS-1 Sample Time: 9:50 10:00 Sample Depth(feet) 0"-6" 0"-6" - Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons(VPH)(Results in mg/kg) C5-C8 Aliphatics <10.6 <10.3 100 C9-C12 Aliphatics <10.6 14.6 1000 C9-C10 Aromatics <10.6 <10.3 100 VPH Target Aromatic Analytes(Results in mg/kg)(1) - VPH Target Analytes(all tested) ND ND -- Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons(EPH)(Results in mg/kg) C9-C18 Aliphatics 161 <15.1 1000 C19-C36 Aliphatics 64.3 47.6 3000 C11-C22 Aromatics 71.9 <15.1 1000 Target PAH Analytes(Results in mg/kg)(1) Target PAH Analytes(all tested) ND ND -- NOTES: (1)=Only those compounds detected are summarized in the table. Please see the E55 Report for a full list of analytes <=Compound was not detected above laboratory reporting limits. The laboratory reporting limits are provided in the table. MCP RCS-1=The applicable Massachusetts Contingency Plan(MCP)Reportable Concentrations(RCs)for category S-1 soils(RCS-1) Yellow Shaded=Concentrations exceed applicable MCP RCS-1. mg/kg=milligrams per kilogram NA=Not analyzed ATTACHMENT 4 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT �pONA4 ;� Est. �!• z GREEN c SEAL m 1997 ��•Ag�a`'a ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division 11 • ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Matthew Duclos Green Seal Environmental, Inc. 114 State Road, Building B Sagamore Beach, MA 02562 ' RE: RBOC- 1602(RBOC- 1602) ESS Laboratory Work Order Number: 1610404 This signed Certificate of Analysis is our approved release of your analytical results. These results are only representative of sample aliquots received at the laboratory. ESS Laboratory expects its clients to follow all regulatory sampling guidelines. Beginning with this page, the entire report has been paginated. This report should not be copied except in full without the approval of the laboratory. Samples will be disposed of thirty days after the final report has been delivered. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call our Customer Service Department. 01 REVIEWED Laurel Stoddard By ESS Laboratory at 10:43 am, Oct 26, 2016 Laboratory Director ' Analytical Summary The project as described above has been analyzed in accordance with the ESS Quality Assurance Plan. This plan utilizes the following methodologies: US EPA SW-846, US EPA Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes per 40 CFR Part 136, APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and other recognized methodologies. The analyses with these noted observations are in conformance to the Quality Assurance Plan. In chromatographic analysis, manual integration is frequently used instead of automated integration because it produces more accurate results. ' The test results present in this report are in compliance with NELAC Standards, A2LA and/or client Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPP). The laboratory has reviewed the following: Sample ' Preservations, Hold Times, Initial Calibrations, Continuing Calibrations, Method Blanks, Blank Spikes, Blank Spike Duplicates, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, Matrix Spike Duplicates, Surrogates and Internal Standards. Any results which were found to be outside of the recommended ranges stated in our SOPS will be noted in the Project Narrative. 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http7Hwww.ESSLaboratorv.com ' Dependability ♦ Quality • Service Page 1 of 19 ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ' - Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division r a of Thielsch Engineering,Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 SAMPLE RECEIPT The following samples were received on October 19,2016 for the analyses specified on the enclosed Chain of Custody Record. To achieve CAM compliance for MCP data, ESS Laboratory has performed and . reviewed all QA/QC Requirements and Performance Standards listed in each method. Holding times and preservation have also been reviewed. All CAM requirements have been achieved unless noted in the project narrative. Each method has been set-up in the laboratory" to reach required MCP standards. The methods for aqueous VOA and Soil Methanol VOA have known limitations for certain analytes. The regulatory standards may not be achieved due to these limitations. In addition, for all methods, matrix interferences, dilutions, and %Solids may elevate method reporting limits above regulatory standards. ESS Laboratory can provide, upon request, a Data Checker (regulatory standard comparison �. spreadsheet)electronic deliverable which will highlight these exceedances. ' Lab Number Sample Name Matrix Analysis 1610404-01 TANK-B-NORTH(0-6") Soil EPH8270,MADEP-EPH,MADEP-VPH 1610404-02 TANK-B-SOUTH(0-6") Soil EPH8270,MADEP-EPH,MADEP-VPH 1610404-03 Trip Blank Solid MADEP-VPH r r . 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http://www.ESSLaboratory.com Dependability • Quality 0 Service ', Page 2 of 19 • ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ' . Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The MiciobiologyDh sion I�l�l ♦ ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 rPROJECT NARRATIVE 1 MADEP-EPH Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons tCZJ0268-CCV2 Continuing Calibration%Diff/Drift is above control limit(CD+). Benzo(g,h,i)perylene(21%@ 20%),Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene(23%@ 20%),Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene (22%@ 20%) No other observations noted. End of Project Narrative. ' DATA USABILITY LINKS Definitions of Quality Control Parameters ' Semivolatile Organics Internal Standard Information Semivolatile Organics Surrogate Information Volatile Organics Internal Standard Information Volatile Organics Surrogate Information EPH and VPH Alkane Lists r r r r r. r 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 h!W://wlvNv.ESSLaboratory.com ' Dependability ♦ Quality • Service Page 3 of 19 . ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory 1�13� Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division i t of Thielsch Engineering,Inc. CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 CURRENT SW-846 METHODOLOGY VERSIONS Analytical Methods Prep Methods 1010A-Flashpoint 3005A-Aqueous ICP Digestion 6010C-ICP 3020A-Aqueous Graphite Furnace/ICP MS Digestion 6020A-ICP MS 3050B-Solid ICP/Graphite Furnace/ICP MS Digestion 7010 -Graphite Furnace 3060A-Solid Hexavalent Chromium Digestion 7196A-Hexavalent Chromium 3510C-Separatory Funnel Extraction 7470A-Aqueous Mercury 3520C-Liquid/Liquid Extraction 7471B-Solid Mercury 3540C-Manual Soxhlet Extraction 8011 -EDB/DBCP/TCP 3541 -Automated Soxhlet Extraction 8015C-GRO/DRO 3546-Microwave Extraction 8081B-Pesticides 3580A-Waste Dilution 8082A-PCB 5030B-Aqueous Purge and Trap 8100M-TPH 5030C-Aqueous Purge and Trap 8151A-Herbicides 5035-Solid Purge and Trap 8260B-VOA 8270D-SVOA 8270D SIM-SVOA Low Level 9014-Cyanide 9038-Sulfate I 9040C-Aqueous pH 9045D-Solid pH(Corrosivity) 9050A-Specific Conductance 9056A-Anions(IC) 9060A-TOC 9095B-Paint Filter MADEP 04-1.1 -EPH/VPH SW846 Reactivity Methods 7.3.3.2(Reactive Cyanide)and 7.3.4.1 (Reactive Sulfide)have been withdrawn by EPA.These ' methods are reported per client request and are not NELAP accredited. 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 ham://www.ESSLaboratoiy.com ' Dependability ♦ Quality ♦ Service Page 4 of 19 . ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ' Division ofThielschEngineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. ' CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 MassDEP Analytical Protocol Certification Form ' MADEP RTN: This form provides certification for the following data set:1610404-01 through 1610404-03 ' Matrices: ( )Ground Water/Surface Water 00 Soil/Sediment ( )Drinking Water ( )Air ( )Other: ' CAM Protocol(check all that apply below): ( ) 8260 VOC ( ) 7470/7471 Hg (X) MassDEP VPH ( )8081 Pesticides ( ) 7196 Hex Cr ( ) MassDEP APH CAM 11 A CAM III B CAM IV A CAM V B CAM VI B CAM IX A ' ( ) 8270 SVOC ( ) 7010 Metals (X) MassDEP EPH ( ) 8151 Herbicides ( ) 8330 Explosives ( ) TO-15 VOC CAM II B CAM III C CAM IV B CAM V C CAM VIII A CAM IX B ( ) 6010 Metals ( ) 6020 Metals ( ) 8082 PCB ( ) 6860 Perchlorate ( ) 9014 Total Cyanide/PAC CAM III A CAM III D CAM V A CAM VIII B CAM VI A Affirmative responses to questions A through F are required for "Presumptive Certainty status ' A Were all samples received in a condition consistent with those described on the Chain-of-Custody,properly Yes(X) No( ) preserved(including temperature)in the field or laboratory,and prepared/analyzed within method holding times? B Were the analytical method(s)and all associated QC requirements specified in the selected CAM protocol(s) Yes(K) No( ) ' followed? C Were all required corrective actions and analytical response actions specified in the selected CAM protocols) Yes(X) No( ) implemented for all identified performance standard non-conformances? D Does the laboratory report comply with all the reporting requirements specified in the CAM VII A,"Quality Yes(K) No( ) ' Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Analytical Data"? E a.VPH,EPH,APH and TO-15 only:Was each method conducted without significant modification(s)?(Refer Yes(K) No( ) to the individual method(s)for a list of significant modifications). b.APH and TO-15 Methods only:Was the complete analyte list reported for each method? Yes( ) No( ) F Were all applicable CAM protocol QC and performance standard non-conformances identified and evaluated Yes(X) No( ) in a laboratory narrative(including all"No"responses to Questions A through E)? ' Responses to Questions G,H and I below are required for"'Presumptive Certainly"status G Were the reporting limits at or below all CAM reporting limits specified in the selected CAM protocols(s)? Yes(X) No( )* Data User Note.Data that achieve"Presumptive Certainty"status may not necessarily meet the data usability and ' representativeness requirements described in 310 CMR 40.1056(2)(k)and WSC-07-350. H Were all QC performance standards specified in the CAM protocol(s)achieved? Yes( ) No(X)* I Were results reported for the complete analyte list specified in the selected CAM protocol(s)? Yes(X) No( )* *All negative responses must be addressed in an attached laboratory narrative. I,'the undersigned,attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that,based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for obtaining the information,the material contained in this analytical report is,to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Q�h��--o Signature: Date: October 26.2016 Printed Name:Laurel Stoddard Position:Laboratory Director 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 h_i):Hwww.ESSLaboratorv.com Dependability • Quality ♦ Service Page 5 of 19 . ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ' r Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The MicrobiologyDivision of Thielsch Engineering,Inc. ' CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. ' Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 Client Sample ID: TANK-B-NORTH(0-6") ESS Laboratory Sample ID: 1610404-01 Date Sampled: 10/18/16 09:50 Sample Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 97 Units:mg/kg dry ' Initial Volume: 24.1 Final Volume: I Prepared: 10/20/16 12:21 Extraction Method: 3546 ' MADEP-EPH Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyte Results(MRL) MDL Method Limit DF Analyst Analyzed Sequence Batch C9-C18Aliphaticsl 161(16.0) MADEP-EPH 1 ZLC 10/20/16 21:04 CZJ0266 CJ62009 ' C19-C36Aliphaticsl 64.3(16.0) MADEP-EPH 1 ZLC 10/20/16 21:04 CZJ0266 CJ62009 C11-C22 Unadjusted Aromatics) 71.9(16.0) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 C11-C22Arorratics1,2 71.9(16.0) EPH8270 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 [CALC] ' 2-Methylnaphthalene ND(0.21) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Acenaphthene ND(0.43) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Naphthalene ND(0.43) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 ' Phenanthrene ND(0.43) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Acenaphthylene ND(0.21) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Anthracene ND(0.43) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 tBenzo(a)anthracene ND(0.43) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Benzo(a)pyrene ND(0.43) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND(0.43) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 tBenzo(g,h,i)perylene ND(0.43) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND(0.43) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Chrysene ND(0.43) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 ' Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene ND(0.21) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Fluoranthene ND(0.43) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Fluorene ND(0.43) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 ' Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene ND(0.43) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Pyrene ND(0.43) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:19 CZJ0268 CJ62009 %Recovery Qualifier Limits swwgate:1{hlarooctadecane 56% 40-140 Surrogate:2-Bromonaphthalene 84% 40-140 ' Surrogate:2-Ruoiobipheny4 88% 40-140 Surrogate:6Teipheny4 63% 40-140 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http://www.ESSLaboratory.com ' Dependability • Quality • Service Page 6 of 19 ' t� •. • j ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory 21Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. TheMicrobio/ogyDivision ' i t ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. ' CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 ' Client Sample ID: TANK-B-NORTH(0-6") ESS Laboratory Sample ID: 1610404-01 Date Sampled: 10/18/16 09:50 Sample Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 97 Units:mg/kg dry ' Initial Volume: 15.1 Analyst: MEK Final Volume: 15 Extraction Method: 5035 ' MADEP-VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon ' Analyte Results(MRL) MDL Method Limit DF Analyzed Sequence Batch C9-CIOAromatics ND(10.6) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:27 CZJ0284 CJ62036 C5-C8 Aliphaticsl,2 ND(10.6) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:27 [CALC] ' C9-C12 Aliphatics2,3 ND(10.6) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:27 [CALC] Benzene ND(0.21) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:27 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Ethylbenzene ND(0.21) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:27 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether ND(0.05) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:27 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Naphthalene ND(021) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:27 CZJ0284 CJ62036 ' Toluene ND(0.21) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:27 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Xylene O ND(0.21) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:27 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Xylene PM ND(0.42) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:27 CZJ0284 CJ62036 ' 1:1 MethanoVSoil Ratio%D 0.7(N/A) MADEP-VPH 10/20/16 7:40 CJ62036 Preservative: McOH-covered MADEP-VPH CJ62036 %Recovery Qualifier umity Swrogate:2,5-Dibromotoluene-FID 10396 70-130 Surrogate:2,5-Dibromotoluene-PID 10196 70-130 Surmgate.•Tnfiuorotoluene-RD 10096 70-130 Sumagate:Trifiuomtoluene-PID 10896 70-130 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI029 10-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http://www.ESSLaboratorv.com Dependability • Quality ♦ Service Page 7 of 19 ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ' c Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division 40. ofTbielscb Engineering,Inc. ' CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 Client Sample ID: TANK-B-SOUTH(0-6") ESS Laboratory Sample ID: 1610404-02 Date Sampled: 10/18/16 10:00 Sample Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 98 Units:mg/kg dry ' Initial Volume: 25.2 Final Volume: 1 Prepared: 10/20/16 12:21 Extraction Method: 3546 ' MADEP-EPH Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyte Results(MRL) MDL Method Limit DF Analyst Analyzed Sequence Batch C9-C18 Aliphatics I ND(15.1) MADEP-EPH 1 ZLC 10/20/16 21:51 CZJ0266 CJ62009 ' C19-C36Aliphatiesl 47.6(15.1) MADEP-EPH 1 ZLC 10/20/16 21:51 CZJ0266 CJ62009 C11-C22 Unadjusted Aromatics] ND(15.1) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 CI I-C22 Aromaticsl,2 ND(15.1) EPH8270 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 [CALC] ' 2-Methylnaphthalene ND(0.20) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Acenaphthene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Naphthalene ND(0.40) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Phenanthrene ND(0.40) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Acenaphthylene ND(0.20) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Anthracene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 ' Benzo(a)anthracene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Benzo(a)pyrene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND(0.40) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Chrysene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 ' Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene ND(0.20) EPH8270 I VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Fluoranthene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Fluorene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 Pyrene ND(0.40) EPH8270 1 VSC 10/20/16 20:54 CZJ0268 CJ62009 ' %Recovery Qualifier Limits Surrogate:1-Mbimctadecane 60% 40-140 Sur.ogate:1-8mmonaphthalene 8596 40-140 Surrogate:1-Rluorobipheny4 94% 40-140 Surrogate:O-Terphenyl 69% 40-140 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http://www.ESSLaboratory.com Dependability • Quality • Service Page 8 of 19 ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ' Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Micro biology Division Y ]�� • } ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 Client Sample ID: TANK-B-SOUTH(0-6") ESS Laboratory Sample ID: 1610404-02 Date Sampled: 10/18/16 10:00 Sample Matrix: Soil Percent Solids: 98 Units:mg/kg dry Initial Volume: 15 Analyst: MEK Final Volume: 15 Extraction Method: 5035 ' MADEP-VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon ' Analyte Results(MRL) MDL Method Limit DF Analyzed Sequence Batch C9-CIOAromatics ND(10.3) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:58 CZJ0284 CJ62036 ' C5-C8 Aliphaticsl,2 ND(10.3) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:58 [CALC] C9-C12Aliphatics2,3 14.6(10.3) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:58 [CALC] Benzene ND(0.21) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:58 CZJ0284 CJ62036 ' Ethylbenzene ND(0.21) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:58 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether ND(0.05) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:58 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Naphthalene ND(0.21) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:58 CZJ0284 CJ62036 ' Toluene ND(0.21) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:58 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Xylene O ND(0.21) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:58 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Xylene PM ND(0.41) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 16:58 CZJ0284 CJ62036 ' 1:1 Methanol/Soil Ratio%D ND(N/A) MADEP-VPH 10/20/16 7:40 CJ62036 Preservative: McOH-covered MADEP-VPH CJ62036 96Recovery Qualifier Limits Surrogate:2,5-Dibromoroluene-RD 10496 70-130 Surrogate:2,5-Dibromotoluene-PID 10496 70-130 Surrogate:Tnfluorotoluene-RD 97% 70-130 Surrogate:TdNuomtoluene-PID 10696 70-130 i r 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 hgRJ/%,%vw.ESSLaboratorv.com ' Dependability • Quality ♦ Service Page 9 of 19 ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory Division ofThielschEngineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division j;A13p � a ofThie/sch Engineering,Inc. ' CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. ' Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank ESS Laboratory Sample ID: 1610404-03 Date Sampled: 10/18/16 00:00 Sample Matrix: Solid Percent Solids: N/A Units:mg/kg ' Initial Volume: 15 Analyst: MEK Final Volume: 15 Extraction Method: 5035 ' MADEP-VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analyte Results(MRL) MDL Method Limit DF Analyzed Sequence Batch C9-CIOAromatics ND(10.0) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 15:54 CZJ0284 CJ62036 C5-C8 A]iphaticsl,2 ND(10.0) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 15:54 [CALC] C9-C12 Aliphatics2,3 ND(10.0) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 15:54 [CALC] Benzene ND(0.20) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 15:54 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Ethylbenzene ND(0.20) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 15:54 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether ND(0.05) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 15:54 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Naphthalene ND(0.20) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 15:54 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Toluene ND(0.20) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 15:54 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Xylene O ND(0.20) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 15:54 CZJ0284 CJ62036 Xylene PM ND(0.40) MADEP-VPH 1 10/20/16 15:54 CZJ0284 CJ62036 ' %Recovery Qualifier Limit Surrogate:2,5-D1brom0t01uene-RD 101% 70-130 Surrogate:2,5-Dibrom0M1ue7e-PID 102% 70-130 ' Surrogate:Trifiuomtoluene-FID 91% 70-130 S✓mwte:Tnfluorotoluene-PID gg% 70-130 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 htti)://xvw%v.ESSLaboratofy.com ' Dependability • Quality • Service Page 10 of 19 j E S S Laboratory BAL Laboratory ti Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division v of Thie/sch Engineering,Inc. CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 Quality Control Data Spike Source %REC RPD Analyze Result MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier MADEP-EPH Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons ' Batch 062009-3546 Blank C19{36 Aliphabcsl ND 15.0 mg/kg wet ' C9-C18 Aliphatic l ND 15.0 mg/kg wet Decane(CIO) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Docosane(C22) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Dodecane(C12) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Eicosane(C20) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Hexacosane(C26) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Hexadecane(C16) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Hexabiacontane(C36) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet ' Nonadecane(C19) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Nonane(0) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Oc-acosane(C28) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Octadecane(C18) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet ' Teracosane(C24) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Teradecane(C14) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet Triacontane(00) ND 0.5 mg/kg wet ' 5u7ogate:1-Chlorooctadecane 1.69 mg/kg wet 1.000 85 40-140 Blank 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.20 mg/kg wet Acenaphthene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Acenaphthylene ND 0.20 mg/kg wet Anhracene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Benzo(a)anthracene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet ' Benzo(a)pyrene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Beizo(g,h,i)perylene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet C11{22 Aromabcsl,2 ND 15.0 mg/kg wet C11{22 Unadjusted Aromaticsl ND 15.0 mg/kg wet Chrysene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet ' Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene ND 0.20 mg/kg wet Fluoranthene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Fluorene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Naphthalene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Phenanthrene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Pyrene ND 0.40 mg/kg wet Su.7Wate:2-Bromanaphtha1ene 1.58 mg/kg wet 2.000 79 40-140 ' Su-gate:2+7uorob/phenyl 1.90 mg/kg wet 2.000 95 40-140 Surrogate:4Terpheny4 1.56 mg/kg wet 2.000 78 40-140 LCS ' C19{36 Aliphadcsl 14.6 15.0 mg/kg wet 16.00 91 40-140 C9-C18 Aliphaticsl 9.3 15.0 mg/kg wet 12.00 77 40-140 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,Rl 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http://www.ESSLaboratory.com ' Dependability ♦ Quality • Service Page 11 of 19 r ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ' Division ofThielschEngineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division s ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. ' CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 ' Quality Control Data Spike Source %REC RPD ' Analyze Result MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier MADEP-EPH Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons ' Batch 062009-3546 Demme(C10) 0.9 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 46 40-140 Docosane(C22) 1.8 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 89 40-140 Dodecane(C12) 1.1 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 53 40-140 Eicosane(C20) 1.6 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 80 40-140 Hexacosane(C26) 1.6 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 78 40-140 Hexadecane(C16) 1.5 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 73 40-140 ' Hexatdacontane(C36) 1.3 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 64 40-140 Nonadecane(C19) 1.7 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 86 40-140 Nonane(C9) 0.8 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 38 30-140 Octacosane(C28) 1.5 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 74 40-140 Octadecane(08) 1.7 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 86 40-140 TeVacosane(C24) 1.5 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 77 40-140 Tetadecane(C14) 1.2 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 61 40-140 Triacontane(C30) 1.4 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 72 40-140 Surrogate:1-MoAvctadecane 1.64 mg/kg wet 2.000 81 40-140 LCS ' 2-Methylnaphthalene 1.28 0.20 mg/kg wet 2.000 64 40-140 Acenaphthene 1.44 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 72 40-140 Acenaphthylene 1.43 0.20 mg/kg wet 2.000 72 40-140 Anthracene 1.61 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 81 40-140 ' Benzo(a)anthracene 1.62 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 81 40-140 Benzo(a)pyrene 1.61 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 80 40-140 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.69 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 84 40-140 ' Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1.69 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 84 40-140 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1.64 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 82 40-140 Cl_-C22 Aromabcsl,2 ND 15.0 mg/kg wet C11C22 Unadjusted Aromatics) 25.5 15.0 mg/kg wet 34.00 75 40-140 Chrysene 1.57 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 79 40-140 Ditenzo(a,h)Anthracene 1.71 0.20 mg/kg wet 2.000 86 40-140 Fluoranthene 1.56 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 78 40-140 Fluorene 1.55 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 77 40-140 ' Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 1.71 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 86 40-140 Naphthalene 1.35 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 68 40-140 Phenanthrene 1.59 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 80 40-140 Pyrene 1.59 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 80 40-140 Surrogate:1-Bromonaphthalene 1.50 mg/kg wet 2.000 75 40-140 Surrogate:1-Ruorobiphenyl 1.87 mg/kg wet 2.000 94 40-140 Surrogate:4Terpheny4 1.72 mg/kg wet 2.000 86 40.140 ' LCS 2-Methylnaphthalene Breakthrough 0.0 °h 0-5 Naphthalene Breakthrough 0.0 % 0-5 LCS Dup C19C36 Aliphabcsl 14.8 15.0 mg/kg wet 16.00 93 40-140 2 25 C9-08 Aliphaticsl 9.4 15.0 mg/kg wet 12.00 78 40-140 0.9 25 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 httl)://www.ESSLaboratory.com ' Dependability • Quality • Service Page 12 of 19 ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ' s Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division I ABC i . ofTbielscb Engineering,Inc. hz� ' CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 Quality Control Data Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier MADEP-EPH Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Batch 062009-3546 Decane(CIO) 0.9 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 45 40-140 2 25 Dccosane(C22) 1.6 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 79 40-140 12 25 ' Dcdecane(C12) 1.1 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 54 40-140 0.9 25 Soosane(C20) 1.6 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 78 40-140 3 25 HExacosane(C26) 1.5 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 77 40-140 2 25 HExadecane(C16) 1.4 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 72 40-140 0.2 25 HExatdacontane(C36) 1.3 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 65 40-140 1 25 Nenadecane(C19) 1.6 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 79 40-140 8 25 Nonane(C9) 0.7 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 36 30-140 4 25 Octacosane(C28) 1.5 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 74 40-140 0.4 .25 Octadecane(C18) 1.5 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 75 40-140 13 25 Tetracosane(C24) 1.6 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 79 40-140 3 25 Tetradecane(C14) 1.2 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 62 40-140 0.3 25 Trlacontane(C30) 1.5 0.5 mg/kg wet 2.000 73 40-140 1 25 rSurrogate:1{rilorooctadecane 1.60 mg/kg wet 2.000 80 40-140 LCS Dup 2-Methylnaphthalene 1.14 0.20 mg/kg wet 2.000 57 40-140 12 30 Acenaphthene 1.30 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 65 40-140 10 30 Acenaphthylene 1.28 0.20 mg/kg wet 2.000 64 40-140 11 30 Anthracene 1.45 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 73 40-140 10 30 Benzo(a)anthracene 1.50 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 75 40-140 8 30 Benzo(a)pyrene 1.48 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 74 40-140 8 30 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.52 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 76 40-140 10 30 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1.45 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 72 40-140 15 30 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1.60 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 80 40-140 3 30 CI1{22 Aromaticsl,2 ND 15.0 mg/kg wet C11-C22 Unadjusted Aromatics) 26.8 15.0 mg/kg wet 34.00 79 40-140 5 25 Chrysene 1.47 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 73 40-140 7 30 Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene 1.51 0.20 mg/kg wet 2.000 76 40-140 12 30 Fluoranthene 1.47 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 73 40-140 6 30 Fluorene 1.41 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 71 40-140 9 30 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 1.48 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 74 40-140 is 30 Naphthalene 1.18 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 59 40-140 14 30 Phenanthrene 1.46 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 73 40-140 9 30 Pyrene 1.50 0.40 mg/kg wet 2.000 75 40-140 6 30 ' Surrogate:2-8mmonaphthalene 1.56 mg/kg wet 1.000 78 40-140 Surrogate:2+70orobipheny4 1.81 mg/kg wet 2.000 91 40-140 Sw wate:t}Terphenyl 1.51 mg/kg wet 2.000 75 40-140 ' LCS Dup 2-M 2-Methylnaphthalene Breakthrough 0.0 % 0-5 200 Naphthalene Breakthrough 0.0 % 0-5 200 MADEP-VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon rBatch C162036-5035 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,Rl 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http://www.ESSLaboratory.com Dependability • Quality ♦ Service Page 13 of 19 ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ti Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division AJ38Q& G + ofThic1sch Engineering,Inc. A B tOR A;T O�R Y CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 Quality Control Data Spike Source %REC RPD P.nalyte Result MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier MADEP-VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon 1 Batch 062036-5035 Blank 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene No 0.20 mg/kg wet 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane NO 5.00 mg/kg wet 2-.Methylpentane ND 5.00 mg/kg wet Benzene ND 0.20 mg/kg wet CS{8 Aliphaticsl,2 NO 10.0 mg/kg wet CE-C8 Aliphaticsl,2 ND 10.0 mg/kg wet CS-C8 Unadjusted Aliphatics ND 10.0 mg/kg wet CS-00 Aromatics NO 10.0 mg/kg wet CS-C12 Aliphatics2,3 NO 10.0 mg/kg wet CS-C12 Aliphatics2,3 NO 10.0 mg/kg wet C9-C12 Unadjusted Aliphatics NO 10.0 mg/kg wet Ethylbenzene NO 0.20 mg/kg wet Methyl tert-Butyl Ether NO 0.05 mg/kg wet Naphthalene ND 0.20 mg/kg wet n-Butylcydohexane NO 5.00 mg/kg wet n-Decane NO 5.00 mg/kg wet Nonane(C9) ND 5.00 mg/kg wet Pentane ND 5.00 mg/kg wet Toluene NO 0.20 mg/kg wet Xylene O ND 0.20 mg/kg wet Xylene P,M NO 0.40 mg/kg wet Su7ogate:1,5-Dibromotoluene-FID 5.09 mg/kg wet 5.000 101 70-130 5,,ogate:2,5.D/bromot01uene-P1D 5.12 mg/kg wet 5.000 101 70-130 Surrogate:Tnfluorotoluene-PAD 4.87 mg/kg wet 5.333 91 70-130 Surrogate:TiiRuorotoluene-PID 5.11 mg/kg wet 5.333 98 70-130 LCS 1,2,4-THmethylbenzene 9.53 0.20 mg/kg wet 10.00 95 70-130 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 14.5 5.00 mg/kg wet 15.00 96 70-130 2-Methylpentane 15.3 5.00 mg/kg wet 15.00 102 70-130 Benzene 5.10 0.20 mg/kg wet 5.000 102 70-130 C5{8 Aliphaticsl,2 ND 10.0 mg/kg wet C5-C8 Aliphaticsl,2 6.82 10.0 mg/kg wet C5-C8 Unadjusted Allphatics 41.7 10.0 mg/kg wet 40.00 104 70-130 C9{30 Aromatics 9.28 10.0 mg/kg wet 10.00 93 70-130 C9-C12 Aliphatics2,3 NO 10.0 mg/kg wet C9-C12 Aliphatics2,3 NO 10.0 mg/kg wet C9-C12 Unadjusted Aliphatics 27.9 10.0 mg/kg wet 30.00 93 70-130 Ethylbenzene 4.99 0.20 mg/kg wet 5.000 100 70-130 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 15.4 0.05 mg/kg wet 15.00 102 70-130 Naphthalene 9.69 0.20 mg/kg wet 10.00 97 70-130 n-Butylcydohexane 8.36 5.00 mg/kg wet 10.00 84 70-130 n-Decane 7.83 5.00 mg/kg wet 10.00 78 70.130 Nonane(0) 7.88 5.00 mg/kg wet 10.00 79 30-130 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 htti):Hwww.ESSLaboratory.com ' Dependability ♦ Quality • Service Page 14 of 19 ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ' Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division Y i s of Thielsch Engineering,Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 Quality Control Data ' Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Qualifier MADEP-VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon Batch 062036-5035 Pentane 11.2 5.00 mg/kg wet 10.00 112 70-130 Toluene 14.4 0.20 mg/kg wet 15.00 96 70-130 xAene 0 9.58 0.20 mg/kg wet 10.00 96 70-130 X0ene P,M 19.2 0.40 mg/kg wet 20.00 96 70-130 SunWate:l,5-Dibromotoluene-FID 5.18 mg/kg wet 5.000 104 70-130 ' Sumogate:15-Dibromotoluene-PID 5.20 mg/kg wet 5.000 104 70-130 Surrogate:Tn luorotoluene-FID 4.80 mg/kg wet 5.333 90 70-130 Surrogate:TnAucrotoluene-PID 5.28 mg/kg wet 5.333 99 70-130 LCS Dup 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.54 0.20 mg/kg wet 10.00 95 70-130 0.1 25 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 14.8 .5.00 mg/kg wet 15.00 99 70.130 2 25 2-Methylpentane 15.5 5.00 mg/kg wet 15.00 103 70-130 1 25 Benzene 5.09 0.20 mg/kg wet 5.000 102 70-130 0.08 25 CS-C8 Aliphaticsl,2 7.37 10.0 mg/kg wet C5-C8 Aliphaticsl,2 7.37 10.0 mg/kg wet CS-C8 Unadjusted Aliphatics 42.2 10.0 mg/kg wet 40.00 106 70-130 1 25 C9-C10 Aromatics 9.33 10.0 mg/kg wet 10.00 93 70-130 0.5 25 ' C9-C12 Aliphatics2,3 ND 10.0 mg/kg wet C9-C12 Aliphatics2,3 ND 10.0 mg/kg wet C9-C12 Unadjusted Aliphatcs 26.5 10.0 mg/kg wet 30.00 88 70-130 5 25 Ethylbenzene 4.97 0.20 mg/kg wet 5.000 99 70-130 0.3 25 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 15.3 0.05 mg/kg wet 15.00 102 70-130 0.5 25 Naphthalene 9.82 0.20 mg/kg wet 10.00 98 70-130 1 25 n-3utylcyclohexane 8.50 5.00 mg/kg wet 10.00 85 70-130 2 25 ' n-Decane 7.62 5.00 mg/kg wet 10.00 76 70-130 3 25 Nonane(C9) 7.79 5.00 mg/kg wet 10.00 78 30-130 1 25 Pentane 11.2 5.00 mg/kg wet 10.00 112 70-130 0.6 25 Tcluene 14.5 0.20 mg/kg wet 15.00 97 70-130 0.3 25 Xytene 0 9.56 0.20 mg/kg wet 10.00 96 70-130 0.2 25 XAene P,M 19.2 0.40 mg/kg wet 20.00 96 70-130 0.04 25 ' Surrogate:2,5-Dibromotoluene-FID 5.33 mg/kg wet 5..000 107 70-130 Surrogate:1,5-Dibromotoluene-PID 5..31 mg/kg wet 5.000 106 70-130 5uoogate:71i9uorotoluene-FID 4.90 mg/kg wet 5.333 91 70-130 Su.rogate.•rf7lU010tv1uene-PID 5.32 mg/kg wet 5..333 100 70-130 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http://%vWYV.ESSLaboratory.com ' Dependability • Quality ♦ Service Page 15 of 19 ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory ' Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 ' Notes and Definitions Z-04 McOH-covered U Analyte included in the analysis,but not detected D Diluted. CD+ Continuing Calibration%Diff/Drift is above control limit(CD+). ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the MRL(LOQ),LOD for DoD Reports,MDL for J-Flagged Analytes dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis RPD Relative Percent Difference MDL Method Detection Limit MRL Method Reporting Limit LOD Limit of Detection LOQ Limit of Quantitation DL Detection Limit UV Initial Volume IN Final Volume Subcontracted analysis;see attached report 1 Range result excludes concentrations of surrogates and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 2 Range result excludes concentrations of target analytes eluting in that range. 3 Range result excludes the concentration of the C9-C10 aromatic range. Avg Results reported as a mathematical average.' NR No Recovery [CALC] Calculated Analyte SUB Subcontracted analysis;see attached report r , r � 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 http://www.ESSLaboratoiy.com Dependability • Quality • Service Page 16 of 19 ESS Laboratory BAL Laboratory Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. The Microbiology Division ofThielsch Engineering,Inc. 4Z, CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS Client Name: Green Seal Environmental,Inc. Client Project ID: RBOC- 1602 ESS Laboratory Work Order: 1610404 ESS LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS AND ACCREDITATIONS ' ENVIRONMENTAL Rhode Island Potable and Non Potable Water:LAI00179 htti)://www.health.ri.gov/find/labs/analytical/ESS.t)d Connecticut Potable and Non Potable Water,Solid and Hazardous Waste:PH-0750 http://wwvv.ct.gov/di)h/lib/dph/environmental health/environmental laboratories/pdf/OutofStateCommercialLaboratories.odf Maine Potable and Non Potable Water,and Solid and Hazardous Waste: RI00002 http://w Av.maine.gov/dhhs/mecdc/environmental-health/water/dwp-services/labcert/documents/AIILabs.xis ' Massachusetts Potable and Non Potable Water:M-RIO02 htti):Hi)ublic.dep.§tate.ma.us/Labcert[Labcert.aspx ' New Hampshire(NELAP accredited)Potable and Non Potable Water,Solid and Hazardous Waste:2424 htty://des.nh.gov/organ iza tion/divisions/water/dwgb/nhelap/index.htm New York(NELAP accredited)Non Potable Water,Solid and Hazardous Waste: 11313 http://w%v%v.wads%vorth.org/labcertlelap/comm.html New Jersey(NELAP accredited)Non Potable Water,Solid and Hazardous Waste:R1006 htti)://datamine2.state.ni.us/DEP OPRA/OvraMain/vi main?mode=pi by site&sort order—PI NAMEA&Select+a+Site:=58715 United States Department of Agriculture Soil Permit:P330-12-00139 Pennsylvania:68-01752 http://www.depweb.state.i)a.us/portal/server.pt/community/labs/13780/laboratory accreditation program/590095 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston,RI 02910-2211 Tel:401-461-7181 Fax:401-461-4486 h_t_tl):Hwww.ESSLaboratory.com ' Dependability ♦ Quality • Service Page 17 of 19 ESS Laboratory Sample and Cooler Receipt Checklist Client: Green Seal Environmental,Inc.-TB/HDM ESS Project ID: 1610404 Date Received: 10/19/2016 Shipped/Delivered Via: ESS Courier Project Due Date: 10/26/2016 Days for Project: 5 Da 1. Air bill manifest present? No 6.Does COC match bottles? Yes Air No.: NA 2. Were custody seals present? No 7.Is COC complete and correct? Yes 3. Is radiation count<100 CPM? Yes 8.Were samples received intact? Yes 4. Is a Cooler Present? Yes 9.Were labs Informed about short holds&rushes? Yes I No/(D Temp: 2.0 Iced with: Ice 10.Were any analyses received outside of hold time? Yes Q 5. Was COC signed and dated by client? Yes 11.Any Subcontracting needed? Yes 1 r l0 12.Were VOAs received? Ye 1 No ESS Sample IDs. a. Air bubbles in aqueous VOAs? es!No Analysis: b. Does methanol cover soil completely? (!!!5/No/NA TAT: 13. Are the samples properly preserved? Ye / No a. If metals preserved upon receipt: Date: Time: By: b. Low Level VOA vials frozen: Date: Time: By: Sample Receiving Notes: 14. Was there a need to contact Project Manager? Yeses a. Was there a need to contact the client? Yes / No Who was contacted? Date: Time: By: Sample Container Proper Air Sufficient Record pH(Cyanide and 608 Bubbles Container Type Preservative Pesticides Number ID Container Present Volume 01 75436 Yes NA Yes 4 oz.Jar-Unpres NP 01 75439 Yes NA Yes VOA Vial-Methanol McOH 02 75435 Yes NA Yes 4 oz.Jar-Unpres NP 02 76438 Yes NA Yes VOA Val-Methanol McOH 03 75437 Yes NA Yes VOA Vial-Methanol McOH 2nd Review Are barcode labels on correct cunt ' ? �Ye /No ////_ �7 Completed h1 f l�G r 5(o By. Date&Time: Reviewed gy Date&Time: /80 Delivered By. to ' Page 18 of 19 ESS Laboratory CHAIN OF CUSTODY ESS Lab 9 4 b — Division of Thielsch Engineering, Inc. Turn Time Standard Other Reporting Limits- � 185 Frances Avenue,Cranston, RI 02910-2211 Regulatory S. MA RI CT NH NJ NY ME Other Tel. (401)461-7181 Fax(401)461-4486 l ct for any of the following:(please circle) Electonic Deliverables Excel Access PDF www essiaboratory.com MA-MCP Navy .USACE .CT DER Other.. p Project.Name 2 Co.Name V-gew SITP.- �41v r hoc- 0 oc " [(902 k ' Contact Person :� .�1J�OS Address V��; y, 3 TT . V state zip cqs�Z Po# Tel. A. r u WkJL Fax emau. ,�Lt05 Ll1Ui 3 P� 4 of Type of. ol d- Grab-G Matrix Sample IDSy ESS Lab ID Date Collection lime Composke C Code Containers Container :�C:ontainer Q�c5�1 C j P�N�--�-�arM�o ° 1 ) : G � X 1 X LLL Container Type P-Poly G Glass AG 4mber Glass SSterile To V VOA Matrix S-Soii SDSosd D-Sludge Ww-Wastewater GW-Gratmdwater SWSurraoe Water DW-Drinking Water 0-011 W-Vtipes F•Fnrer Preservation Code: 1-NP,2-HCl,3H2SO4,4HNO3,5-NaOH,6-INe0Hj AsorbfcActd,8-ZnAct,9- Cooler Present es No Internal Use Only _ Seats Intact Yes No NA:_ [q Pickup Sampled by.:,. Cooler Temperature: a o CQ �4 j Technician Comments: R cashed by(S n lure, ate&Time by. g re, T ell lshed (S• a, ate& me) r`I� Received by.(Signature,Date&Time) — I��I a I ;�s t Relinquished by.(Signature,Date&Tlme) Received by.(Si Data&Tina Relinq shed by(S gnatur ate& im Received by.(Suture,Date&Ttme) eilh- r �/ 17:d �� !� /73J lease fax to the laboratory all changes to Chain of Custody 1(White)Lab Copy "$y&Cffng MA-MCP,client nknovAedges samples were 2(Yellow)Client Receipt collected in acoordance with MADEP CAM VITA FOR 33 UCIOKs (t4 V N?-N D Ott) Please print or.type.(Form designed for use on elite(I2•pitch)typewriter..) Form, OMB No.2050-0039 UNIFORM HAZARDbUS t.Generator ID Number 2.Page 1 of 3.Emergency Response Phone 4.Mannest Tracking Number rHARVAN E MANIFEST M !�• D 0 1 .1 3 a i1 2 R ri 1 800 667-745 1015133373. JJ K cu:s6aglaapyt11naAddr�C Generator's Site Address(If different than mailing address) REAT b4ESTEN RD MA 02646 s Phone: 5 '0 8 `� 3 2 - 0 5 3 0 U.S.EPA ID Number 6.Transporter 1 Company Name Ivi A C 3 0 0 0 9 8 5 8 9 Boaton Green Fuel Company, Inc. 7.Transporter 2 Company Name U.S.EPA ID Number ENPRO SERVICES, INC. IM A C 3 0 0 0 9 8 3 9 9 U.S.EPA ID Number 8. t�ft rbVd�XRMONT,INC. .64 AVENUE D WAWSTON:VT05495 VTR00061 7052 Facill sPhona:802 815n71200 93. 9b.U.S.DOT Description 10,Containers.Qnduding Proper Shipping Name,Hazard Class,ID Number, 11.Total 12.Unit 13,Waste Codes HM and Paddng Group(it any)) No. Type Quantity WtNol. t N 1993,Y�4STE.FII�MMABLE LIQUIDS,N.O.S.(DENATURED ��® 01 o ALCOHOL:)3,PG ll 4g DM 9@@Er C, z 2• ' w 3 4 t4.Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 15. GENERATOR'SIOFFEROR'S CERTIMATION.I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by lhe,proper shipping name,menardtre classified,I am the packaged, marked and labela0lacarded,and are In.all respects in proper condition for transport according to applicable international and national governmental regulations.It export shipment and I am the Pilmary Exporter,I certify that tlte'bcatents of this oonslgnment conform to the terms of the attached EPAAcknowledgmeht of Consent. I certify that the waste minimization statement Identified 1p40 CFR 262.27(a)(if I am a large quantity generator)or(b)(If I am a small quantity generator)is true. Month Day Year Gerieratorsl or. Printed/Typed Name.:- Sigriatu 6 vsi� . 16.ntema onal Shipments ❑import to U.S.' ❑Export from t.S.. Port of entrylexit Trenspoder signature(forexports d'nly):' Date leaving U.S.: a 17.TransporterA00wledgment of ReceiptOf Materials w Month, Day Year Transportet 1..R nt yped Name ' f Signature 00, Transporter. PrintedflypedName sig'nalure Month Day Year 18.Discrepancy. 188.Discrepancy Indication Space ❑ Quantity ❑Type ❑Residue ❑Partial Rejection ❑Full Rejection Manifest Reference Number. 18b.Allemate Fadlity(or Generator) U.S.EPA ID Number C.) , Facility's Phone: W 18c.Signature of Allemste adlity(or Generator Month Day Year Q z 19.Hazardous Waste Report Management Method Codes(l.e.,codes for hazardous waste treatment,disposal,and recycling systems) 3. G 1• 2' 4. 20.Designated Facility Owner or Operator.Certification of recelpt of hazardous materials covered by the manifest except as noted In Item 18a Month Day Year PnntedlT ame Signature EPA Form 8700-22(Rev.3.05) Previous editions are obsolete. DESIGNATED FACILITYTO.DESTINATION STATE(IF REQUIRED) � . Re N !11 ? Invoice Number: 4781 UuQ3At�i� o I L� p Invoice Date: Se 27,2016 102 Charles A. Eldridge Drive Page: 1 Lakeville, MA 02347 388-338-2657_ : • .. u..., ...,., ..:.. .1...... •.,,..... .•..... Bill T.o...... .......:...::: .:.....�... ....: ,........t... ...... ROBERT B OUR ROBERT B OUR 24 GREAT WESTERN ROAD 24 GREAT WESTERN ROAD N HARW I CH, MA 02645 , N HARW I CH, MA 02645 ustol ,a m ent .ermsa RBO DARREN JOHNSON Net 30 Days — Y Shi InMev4ho°d 4 ' ;;r ate I Due Date Ship D RIGAZIO US Mail 10/27/16 Quantity Item Unrt�of{Measure �w ;y ' ,r Descri tion Unit Pricer Amount`:;,.;;:' 1.00 EACH PICK UP AND TRANSPORTATION TO 250.000 250.00 FACILITY 2.00 DRUM DISPOSAL OF DENATURED ALCOHOL 215.000 430.00 i i S�s��� c, ;. Subtotal 680.00 Sales Tax Total Invoice Amount 680.00 Check/Credit Memo No: Payment/Credit Applied _ 80r00.: TOTAL_ "` Past due invoices are subject to a 1.5% monthly service charge. fi E act.':T„r;,h Cc r.:.hl a:,p•(o ,';: °p THE►, Town of Barnstable Office:508-862-4644 Public Health Division Fax:508-790-6304 BARN STABLE. 200 Main Street• Hyannis, MA 02601 �1°lFOMA+�`0 TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSPECTION REPORT Business Name: 0�0b44 51 1 C.e Date: Location/Mailing Address: 33 coo vlvl15 0 23 Contact Name/Phone: e J o-��'+�.e: E e- ►1 �8-77r' Invento Total Amount: 1 I�) MSDS: ? }o ��+�'�n�` License#: 10510 Tier II : a Labeling: I 'dlr5 'I�bele� Sill Plan: o' Oi[/Water Separator: A) A Floor Drains: IL10 Emergency Numbers: /1 Storage Areas/Tanks: A 1I ftay ►t "sfolcoe i erg ,K, o f ggrg1,L 01-k cr&hcrel c <1ooc3 E'lQ.�tr,07 Emergency/Containment Equipment: — 4u4v a k 9 Waste Generator ID: - Waste Product: Date&Amount of Last Shipment/Frequency ear-5 o Tug ? o 41 4►,t4 4, gza+r^ 8, / LIST OF TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Oar ZJeC +�i�'y o�� -�nz.-2xfi rt�fv�S�t¢,•� NOTE: Under the provisions of Ch. 111, Section 31, of thg General Laws of MA, hazardous material u6e, storage and disposal of 111 gallons or more requires a license from the Public Health Division. Antifreeze Dry cleaning fluids Automatic transmission fluid Other cleaning solvents&spot removers Engine and radiator flushes Bug and tar removers 0 Hydraulic fluid (including brake fl i ) Windshield wash oo�5 nay s Miscellaneous Corrosives $� Motor oils 1K- S�t1 b Gasoline,let fuel, avion gas 5,6_0 Cesspool cleaners Diesel fuel, kerosene, #2 heating oil Disinfectants Miscellaneous petroleum products: Road salts grease, lubricants, gear oil Refrigerants Degreasers for engines&garages Pesticides: Caulk/Grout insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides Battery acid (electrolyte)/batteries Photochemicals(Fixers) Rustproofers Photochemicals(Developer) Car wash detergents Printing ink Car waxes and polishes Wood preservatives(creosote) Asphalt&roofing tar Swimming pool chlorine Paints, varnishes, stains, dyes Lye or caustic soda Lacquer thinners Miscellaneous Combustible Paint&varnish removers, deglossers Leather dyes Miscellaneous Flammables Fertilizers .Floor&furniture strippers PCB's Metal polishes Other chlorinated hydrocarbons Laundry soil &stain removers (including carbon tetrachloride) (including bleach) Any other products with "poison labels" 10 „x „� fe�2as� (including chloroform, formaldehyde, hydrochloric acid, other acids)) VIOLATIONS: I O ORDERS: &%vL MS rj . t;; - 60+1 41ayl, aK, 64.e— INFORMATION/RECOMMENDATIONS: 6,W6 vi o o c- S Co v& ra 10U s + k'A'eeS G, itw ,�,2 a 5 e• o ,« 0df>e- � � �5 06a .�uelC leII ka7,ar&s � P40 'spector:p.,I J -f--et g Co,'+wt,-s a.F of �-1 s -{'o OQ�JIalility Representative: WHITE COPY-HEALTH DEPARTMENT/CANARY COPY-BUSINESS J Town of Barnstable Office:508-862-4644 Public'Health Division Fax:508-790-6304 B""M LE.$ 200 Main Street• Hyannis, MA 02601 ' �'°'FOMA+A`•+ `' TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSPECTION REPORT Business Name: �v���t�X C71 � Cov.1, a.ti Date: �ll2v �y Location/Mailing Address: 33 coals v' vw�i, ^lQf o.x ►23 Contact Name/Phone: ��c� � ,.c� 509 - 5;�-7- 4I r0 oTrte-e E-JeI,A- kg,- S��o-77�- Inventory Total Amount: 11 ZSi/k 1 MSDS: ? 10� 4" bl- v10+-C'CP License#: !aS(o Tier II : o Labeling: VYt�rt2'•Sruws vv� Spill Plan: N o 7 Oil/WaterSeparator: MIA Floor Drains: No Emergency Numbers: /1 Storage Areas/Tanks: A it �4 1fore e ,M/-A01i, IVt 611e4 4?gCoe"e— k-,h+k coAr,rele �?oncs e,,+/ Emergency/Containment Equipment: + -! c4 4,r;j `-\-4 u I a �q , ,, s lLa - Waste Generator ID: U��vs��u�ly � ��f2�e Waste Product: Date&Amount of Last Shipment/Frequency: lk3 o 'clel 0-5 1 W. a �a�S L4eensedWaste44ar�lew-&Destinat �3fion: , ova �l�rvt� .LvKA �« a G►ol � Other-Waste-DispesaWeth&s r� ?�v�_sk o,t"' So ,! R41 y- 2 44 ) Iwo w- a i i LIST OF TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS C�l�a�ae�� 2ko ��������1 mvcr�.eac� Size .ram NOTE: Under the provisions of Ch. 111, Section 31, of the General Laws of MA, hazardous material u e, storage and disposal of 111 gallons or more requires a license from the Public Health Division. Antifreeze Dry cleaning fluids ' Automatic transmission fluid Other cleaning solvents&spot removers Engine and radiator flushes Bug and tar removers S"O` Hydraulic fluid (including brake fluid) Windshield wash pots Motor oils w 594 sol^�;5+an� �l�.-t5 Miscellaneous Corrosives Gasoline,jet fuel, aviation gas Sesp Cesspool cleaners Diesel fuel, kerosene, #2 heating oil Disinfectants Miscellaneous petroleum products: Road salts grease, lubricants, gear oil Refrigerants Degreasers for engines&garages Pesticides: j Caulk/Grout _, insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides Battery acid (electrolyte)/batteries ' Photochemicals(Fixers) Rustproofers Photochemicals(Developer) Car wash detergents Printing ink Car waxes and polishes _ Wood preservatives(creosote) Asphalt&roofing tar Swimming pool chlorine . Paints, varnishes, stains, dyes Lye or caustic soda Lacquer thinners Miscellaneous Combustible Paint&varnish removers, deglossers Leather dyes ✓ Miscellaneous Flammables Fertilizers Floor&furniture strippers PCB's Metal polishes Other chlorinated hydrocarbons ' Laundry soil &stain removers (including carbon tetrachloride) ` (including bleach) Any other products with "poison labels" �� IS (including chloroform,formaldehyde, J y hydrochloric acid, other acids) VIOLATIONS: lJoSbS ORDERS: 0(0 PAS tN . nfA 50,1 =, 'iavL 1 INFORMATION/RECOMMENDATIONS: Ao (o c' S Opo ve-1 i -S•}ar .e- 16u`+ s T, 1( JecefY1 '""' C �v�l5e_ ►55�e-5. �ecowtn*.,Rv>.�Z _Oc���-e.� aQ�S 4-o o5 1 arl+� CII ku��ur�pJs t 5-f��5►°+P Tk�PI�,� ,Mo Inspector: <I &C d Facility Representative: � � 'I"ca S�t�CuK-f� �r 5 0 0l 5 -1-n �Jn 5. WHITE COPY-HEALTH DEPARTMENT/CANARY COPY-BUSINESS Built on trust 0 To: Town of Barnstable Septem 1, 2016 Health Department ` 200 Main St. Hyannis, MA 02601 Re: Demolition of 33 Brooks Rd., Hyannis, MA (Hubbard Oil)—List of Contractor's and Facilities to Remove/Receive Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Demolition Materials. 1. Asbestos Banner Environmental Services, Inc. 254 Bodwell St., Unit C Avon,MA 02322 781-934-6873 2. Oil and Containers Recycled at Robert B. Our Co. shop 3. Denatured Alcohol Boston Green Co. 102 Charles Eldredge Dr. Lakeville,MA 02347 *will pick up at Robert B. Our Co. 4. 275 Gal. Oil Tank Tank Removal Services 58 Willow Ave. Hyannis,MA 02601 508-778-8265 5. Paint Cans Disposed of at Local Landfill Drop off 6. Wood Demo Material Champion City Recovery 138 Wilder St. Brockton, MA 02301 508-941-6700 7. Concrete Demo Material Robert B. Our Co., Inc. 24 Great Western Rd. Harwich, MA 02645 508-432-0530 8. Steel Demo Material Spiegel Scrap Metal 212 North Carry St. Brockton, MA 02302 508-897-0008 24 Great Western Rd., P.O. Box 1539, Harwich, MA 02645 -Tel. 508-432-0530 Fax. 508-432-4385 Please print or type.(Form designed for use on elite(12-pitch)typewriter.) fSCin; Form Approved.OMB No.2050-0039 UNIFORM HAZARDOUS 1.rGenerator ID Number rt fxti 2.Page 1 of 3.Emergency Response Phone 4.Manifest Tracking Number WASTE MANIFEST t 1 rl I i1 f *+� ll 015133373 JJK 5.Generators Namg end Mailing Addressl, Generator's Site Address(if different than mailing address) 1 1 'i .'f "A '•I L(-T 'f 11^t•t."•i• it E.1' Il:t' Ih •. 11 r II •� I It Generator's Phone: 6.Tra1,.•nsporter 1 Company Name U.S.EPA ID Number 7.Transporter 2 Company Name U.S.EPA ID Number I t if 'f;' • ✓ 1.' 1•.I If it b l '1 '- • 11 f) It ; %f t1 8.Designated_Facility,Name and Site Address 1,t.1• .1.1 1 11 1, U.S.EPA ID Number I , 1 1,101. 1' All i I W-Okh Facility's Phone: ga. 9b.U.S.DOT Description(including Proper Shipping Name,Hazard Class,ID Number, 10.Containers 11.Total 12.Unit HM and Packing Group(if any)) No. Type Quantity Wt.Nol. 13.Waste Codes .IY11 O Z 2. w 3. 4. ir.f I,IA to r-C1 It . JI 'ftlf' Cl.•.`.� 1°f 1.•,:Nl 't 14.Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 1 16. GENERATOR'SIOFFEROR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by the proper shipping name,and are classified,packaged, marked and labeled/placarded,and are in all respects in proper condition for transport according to applicable international and national governmental regulations.If export shipment and I am the Primary Exporter,I certify that the contents of this consignment conform to the terms of the attached EPA Acknowledgment of Consent. I certify that the waste minimization statement identified in 40 CFR 262.27(a)(if I am a large quantity generator)or(b)(if I am a small quantity generator)is true. eneratorsl0, es PrintedlTyped Nargee, //. Cj y Sign{atturre r j� - / Month Day Year i 16.International Shipments ❑Import to U.S. ❑Export from U.S. Port of entry/exit: E- Z Transporter signature(for exports only): Date leaving U.S.: i w 17.TransporterAcknowledgment of Receipt of Materials Transporter 1 P' ed Name i1 r / Si nature f1 Mo th Day+} Year P yp �I✓ /LJ �G / : 9 i `�'�Cr��t:1w.1'` I� a I Z Transporter 2 PrintedrTyped Name Signature Month Day Year 18.Discrepancy 18a.Discrepancy Indication Space ❑ Quantity El Type ❑Residue El Partial Rejection ❑Full Rejection 1 Manifest Reference Number: iz 18b.Alternate Facility(or Generator) U.S.EPA ID Number J U ta+ Facility s Phone: W 18c.Signature of Alternate Facility(or Generator) Month Day Year Q Z y19.Hazardous Waste Report Management Method Codes(i.e..codes for hazardous waste treatment,disposal,and recycling systems) 0 1. 2. 7- 4. Fintedfed acility Owner or Operator:Certffcation of receipt of hazardous materials covered by the manifest except as noted in Item 18a me Signature Month Day Year 4 EPA Form 8700-22(Rev.3-05) Previous editions are obsolete. GENERATOR'S INITIAL COPY Bunton gust To: Town of Barnstable September 21, 2016 Health Department .200 Main St. Hyannis.,MA 02601 Re: Demolition of 33 Brooks Rd., Hyannis,MA (Hubbard Oil)—List of Contractor's and Facilities to Remove/Receive Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Demolition Materials. 1. Asbestos Banner Environmental.Services,Inc. 254 Bodwell St., Unit C Avon,MA 02322 781-934-6873 2. Oil and Containers Recycled at Robert B. Our Co. shop 3. Denatured Alcohol Safety-Kleen will pick up at Robert B. Our Co. 4. 275.Gal. Oil Tank Tank Removal Services 58 Willow Ave. Hyannis,MA 02601, 508-778-8265 5. Paint Cans Disposed of at Local Landfill Drop off 6. Wood Demo Material Champion City Recovery 138 Wilder St. Brockton, MA 02301 508-941-6700 i 7. Concrete Demo Material Robert B. Our Co., Inc. 24 Great Western Rd. Harwich,MA 02645 508-432-0530 8. Steel Demo Material Spiegel.Scrap Metal 212 North Carry St. Brockton, MA 02302 508-897-0008 24 Great Western Rd., P.O. Box 1539, Harwich, MA 02645-Tel. 508-432-0530 Fax. 508-432-4385 I "DUPLICATE TICKET'" SITE TICKET GRID WEIGHMASTER -own of Harwich Disposal Area 01 841098 Erin 1.0. 1543 DATE IN DATE OUT TIME IN TIME OUT VEHICLE ROLL OFF Harwich,MA 02645 0 /21/16 .0 /21/16 1 :51 1 :51 100005 Robert B. Our Co. REFERENCE 0. P.O. Box 1539 Harwich MA 02645 Manual Gross Wt. 5100 LB Inbound-Charge ticket Manual Tare Wt. 5000 LB Net eight 1,00 LB CITY. UNIT DESCRIPTION RATE EXTENSION FEE TOTAL 0.05 TON T wn Misc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TENDERED �J CHANGE CHECK NO. WW6T1 TO REORDER CONTACT CAROLINA SOFT%VARE(910)799-6767 SIGNATURE -�� I Bill McMahon From: Lisa-Anne DeMello <LDeMello@bannerenvironmental.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 21,2016 9:06 AM To: Bill McMahon Cc: Stephen Wenzel Subject: DEP Notification Attachments: 33 Brooks Rd. Hyannis 091616.pdf,Asbestos License.pdf Hi Bill, Attached please find the DEP Notification for the Brooks Roadproject and our Asbestos Contractor License. Since Banner is not doing the demo we.wouldn't have filed for an AQ06 Permit. The waste record will come after the waste has moved to the landfill. Let us know if you have any further questions. Have a good day, Lisa Banner Environmental Services, Inc. 31 Hayward Street, Suite 2A-205 Franklin,MA 02038 Tel:781-934-6873 Fax:866-934-2374 Website: www.bannerenvironmental.eom i AQ 04 - Asbestos Removal Notification Form ANF-001-Transaction#859286 Page 1 of 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 1100249696 BWP AQ 04 (ANF-001) Asbestos Project# ' Asbestos Notification Form BProject Revision Project Cancellation A. Asbestos Abatement Description 1. Facility Location: COMMERCIAL PROPERTY r -� 33 BROOKS ROAD �� a.Name of Facility b.Street Address HYANNIS 1 508 983t>913 c.Chy/Town d.State e.Zip Code f.Telephone DARRENJOHNSON IMANANGER —� g.Facility Contact Person Name h.Facility Contact Person Title Instructions 1.All Worksite Location: JEASEMENT soctions of this form must I.Building Name,Wing,Floor,Room,etc. bo complotod In ardor to conplyWth MassDEP 2. Is the facility occupied? a❑a.Yes L`.I b.No notification requiromonls 3. Is this a fee exempt notification(city,town,district,municipal housing authority,state facility,or owner- of 310 CMR 7.15 and Department of Labor occupied residential property of four units or less)?1-C-31a.Yea [],b.No Standards(DLS) notification roqulremonts 4. Blanket Permit Project Approval,if applicable: ---� of 453 CMR 6.12 Approval ID# 5. Non-Traditional Asbestos Abatement Work Practice Approval,if applicable: E Approval ID# MassDEP Use Only C--� I 6.Asbestos Contractor. Date Received BANNER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC CROCKVIEW WAY a.Name b.Address' ROCKLAND�_____ ® 02370 781-021-ti681 —� 2.Submit Original c.City/Town d.State e.Zip Code f.Telephone Farm To: AC000884 � h.Contract Type: 1.Written Commonwealth of — � �?•Verbal g.DLS License# Massachusetts P.O. �" Box 4062 Boston,MA WADY ORTEGA _ �AS034956 02211 a.Name of Contractor's On-Site Supervisor/Foreman b.DLS Certification# --I 8, OONN D.JR.LAFLAMME 1--� A 0041143 t a.Name of Project Monitor b.DLS Certification# g, JAEC LABORATORIES,LLC �� IAA000197 -I a.Name of Asbestos Analytical Lab b.DLS Certification# 10.D9n4/016 o9116rz016 a.Project Start Date(MM/DD/YYYY) b.End Date(MM/DONYYY) 5:T_ 10 c.Work Hours-Monday Through Friday d.Work Hours-Saturday 8 Sunday 11.What type of project is this? na.Demolition F[_3�b.Renovation Q c.Repair F[�]d.Other-Please Specify: i 12.Abatement procedures(check all that apply): 7111a.Glove Bag F[]Ib.Encapsulation �Ic.Enclosure nd.Disposal Only �e.Cleanup Q f.Full Containment ng.Other-Please Specify: rL—Ir ^ httos Wedet).dev.mass.vov/WebForms/AsbestosB WPANFOO l.aspx 8/25/2016 AQ 04 -Asbestos Removal Notification Form ANF-001-Transaction#859286 Page 2 of 4 13.Job is being conducted: aa.Indoors-1b.Outdoors 14 a.Total amount of each type of asbestos Containing materials(ACM)to be removed,enclosed,or encapsulated: r�__ ------ 1.Linear Feet(Lin.Ft.) 2.Square Feet(Sq.Ft.) b.Boiler,Breaching,Duct,Tank c.Transits Pipe -1 Surface Coatings 1.Lin.Ft. 2.Sq.Ft. 1.Lin.Ft. 2.Sq.Ft. d.Pipe Insulation � e.Transits Shingles L-=E_�_ 1.1In.FI. 2.Sq.FI. 1.Lin.Ft. 2.Sq.Ft. f.Spray-On Fireproofing g.Transits Panels 1.Lin.Ft. 2.Sq.Ft. 1.Un.Ft. 2.Sq.Ft. h.Cloths,Woven Fabrics I.Other-Please Specify: 1.Lin.Ft. 2.Sq.Ft. j.Insulating Cement �� PIPE INSULATION,ASSO.MAT 87 _ l 1.Lin.Ft. 2.Sq.Ft. 1.Lin.Ft. 2.Sq.Ft. 15.Describe the decontamination system(s)to be used: - 3 CHAMBER AS INDICATED ^� i V 16.Describe the containerization/disposal methods to comply with 310 CMR 7.15 and 453 CMR 6.14(2) (9)� - WASTE WILL REMAIN WET AT ALL TIMES PLACED IN DOUBLE 6MIL LABELED POLY BAGS ! Vi 17.For Emergency Asbestos Operations,the MassDEP and DLS officials who evaluated the emergency: L- _- F a.Name of MassOEP Official -1 fib..Titlelee tl off-MassOEP Official -1 c.Date of Authorization(MMIDD/YYYY) d.Waiver p e.Name of DLS Official f.Title of DLS Official g.Date of Authorization(MMlDDNYYY) h.Waiver q 18.Do prevailing wage rates as per M.G.L.c..149,§26,27 or 27A-F apply to this FE-11a.Yes�b.No project? B. Facility Description 1. Current or prior use of facility: COMMERCIAL 2. Is the facility owner-occupied residential with 4 units or less? I�I a.Yesab.No 3. iC/0 ROBERT B.OUR,INC.' � IV GREAT WESTERN ROAD a.Facility Owner Name b.Address HARWICH ---- -------� l''� 02645 _ 50B-Q&q-0913 c.City/Town d.State e.Zip Code f.Telephone 4. INA _ �- _- 1 NA --� a.Name of Facility Owner's On-Site Manager b.Address NA ] ® 02645 06D-000.0000 c.City/Town d.Stale e.Zip Code L Telephone 5. NA T� NA a.Name of General Contractor b.Address htti)s:Hedep.dep.mass:gov/WebForms/AsbestosBWPANF001.aspx 8/25/2016 AQ 04 -Asbestos Removal Notification Form ANF-001-Transaction 9859286 Page 3 of 4 NA c.Cily/Town d.state e.Zip Code f.Telephone g.Contractor's Worker's Compensation Insurer 03M017 --� h.Policy# I.Expiration Date(MM/DD/YYYY) 6.What is the size of this facility? --� 0� ---� a.Square Feet b.#of Floors C. Asbestos Transportation & Disposal 1.Transporter of asbestos-containing waste material from site of generation: a a.Directly to Landfill or`���/{b.To Temporary Storage Location/Transfer Station BANNER VI ENRONMENTAL BODWELL ST c.Name of Transporter d.Address Note:Temporary storage -- `-1 or Asbestos containingAVON r781-934 6873 waste material Is only e.Chyfrown f.State g.Zip Code h.Telephone allowed at the place of 2. If a temporary storage location/transfer station is used,list name of transporter of asbestos containing business of o US. waste material from temporary storage location/transfer station to final disposal site: licensed Asbestos ff contractor or transfer RED TECHNOLOGY INC�— 173 PICKERING _ __J station that Is permitted a.Name of Transporter fib.A—ddre—ss-- byMassDEPand pORTLAND CT� law —� laZ-1022 operated In compliance c.Cilyfrown d.State e.Zip'Code f.Telephone with Solid Waste Regulations 310 CMR 3. Name and address of temporary storage location/transfer station for the asbestos containing waste 19.000 material: _ PAGE ST a.Temporary Storage Location Name ��,—, b.Address ,— STOUGHTON �,_"_� I' I 04072 c.Cityfrown d.State e.Zip Code f.Telephone 4. Name and location of final disposal site(asbestos landfill): MINERVA — — ~ � LMINERVA a.Final Disposal Site Name b.Final Disposal Site Owner Name 9000 MINERVA RD c.Address _ WAYNESBURG �!� OH 44688 d.Chyfrown e.State f.Zip Code g.Telephone D. Certification I certify That I have personally examined IBETH MCKINNON 1bETH MCKINN0N the foregoing and am familiar with the 1.Name 2.Authorized Signature information contained In this document —`- -------, OFFICE MANAGER —�� 08/25I2016 and all attachments and that,based on Note:Contractor must 3.Pashlon/Tige 4.Date(MWDD/YYYY) my inquiry of those individuals sign this form for DLS immediately responsible for obtaining 78/g34 5873 —_ BANNER ENVIRONMENTAL i notification purposes the information,I believe that the 5.Telephone 6.Representing Information is true,accurate,and 1254 BODWELL ST complete.I am aware that there are 7.Address B.Cityfrown significant penalties for submitting false ram--— — ---t information,including possible fines and I imprisonment.The undersigned hereby 9•State 10.Zip Code stales that I have read the httns://eden.det).mass.t;ov/WebForms/AsbestosBWPANF001.aspx 8/25/2016 AQ 04 -Asbestos Removal Notification Form ANF-001-Transaction#859286 Page 4 of 4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts regulations governing asbestos abatement(453 CMR 6.00 promulgated by the Department of Labor Standards and 310 CMR 7.15 promulgated by the Department of Environmental Protection),and that I am aware that this permit application or notification shall not be deemed valid unless payment of the applicable fee is made." httns://eden.den.mass.eov/WebFonns/AsbestosB WPANF001.asox 8/25/2016 Certificate No: A04SI61 > � THE COMMONWEALTH Or MASSACHUSETTS Exi.CUTtvE Orrtcr or LABOR AND Wowrotzce Drvet oPMr:NT "rr.`� DEPARTIYICNT OF LABOR STANDARDS 19 STANBFORD S•rRLN r,BOSTON,MASSACHUSr•M 02114 ASBESTOS CONTRACTOR LICENSE BANNER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 254 BODWELL-STREET UNIT C AVON MA 02322 LICENSE: AC000884 EXPIRES: Friday,April 07,2017 IN ACCORDANCE WITH MGL CH. 149§6B AND 453 CMR 6.04 THIS CERTIFICATE 1S ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR STANDARDS TO THE CONTRACTOR ABOVE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENTERING INTO OR ENGAGING IN ASBESTOS WORK. THIS LICENSE 1S VALID FOR A PERIOD OF ONE(1)YEAR. Aly WILLIAM D.MCKINNEY,DIRECTOR Please detach this mailing tab andkeep your license certificate In an accessible location.A copy of this license must be maintained at each worksite. BANNER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. A w 31 HAYWARD STREET SUITE 2A-205 FRANKLYN,MA 02038 Bill McMahon From: Lisa-Anne DeMello <LDeMello@bannerenvironmental.com> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 1:14 PM To: Bill McMahon Cc: Stephen Wenzel Subject: Robert B Our Certificate Attachments: Robert B Our Certificate:pdf, Robert B Our 33 Brooks Rd Hyannis_091416_COC.pdf Hi Bill, Attached is the Clearance Report that you need for demo at 33 Brooks Rd., Hyannis as well as you Certificate of Completion. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Lisa Banner Environmental Services, Inc. 31 Hayward Street, Suite 2A-205 Franklin, MA 02038 Tel:781.-934-6873 Fax:866-934-2374 Website: wv<,,,v.bannerenvironmental.com i lit► i m ANNER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ASBESTOS ABATEMENT CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION ABATEMENT PERFORMED BY: BANNER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. ASBESTOS CONTRACTOR LICENSE # AC000884 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 33 Brook Road, Hyannis, MA DATE OF COMPLETION: 9/ 14/ 16 DEP DECAL #: 100249696 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS REMOVED: • Asbestos Abatement: • Removal of— 87 linear feet of asbestos containing pipe insulation. • Removal of boiler and associated asbestos containing material up to the first connection. 3RD PARTY CLEARANCE: MAC SERVICES, LLC APPROVED WASTE DISPOSAL SITE: MINERVA LANDFILL, WAYNESBURG, OH, PERMIT #15-1292 r MAC Services,LLC Lab 1D:AA000235 ASBESTOS AIR SAMPLING LOG(Version 1.2 Revised 11/06/201 4) Page 1 of 2 PCM:MOSH 7400 Method(Revision#3,Dated 8/15/1994) Client Name: Banner Environmental Services.Inc. Project#:2016 3)03 Microscope Cleaned:Yes Client Address: 16 Black River Way,Duxbua,MA Microscope Number: OL-01 Pass HSE-NPL Test Slide&Date: Yes Collection Date: 09/14/16 Ref. Slide Data(No.&fib/f1d):L1-14/100 Graticule Field Area(MM2):0.00785 Collected By:Joseph Cooney Phase Rings Aligned:Yes Analyzed By:Joseph Cooney Project Location: Office building of former Hubbard Oil Co.complex—33 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA.—work area is boiler area in basement Location/Activity Sample Pump Pump Time Rotometer Flow Rate Volume LOQ Actual Adjusted Analyst Sample# or Type On Off ins LPi Liters Count Count* Result* ID Worker Name/ Task (1-10) hh:mm hh:mm [A] On Off Ave[B] A*B=[C] (2.7/C) (F/Flds) (F/Fids) (F/CC) Initials 091416-01 Blank 10 - - - - - - - - 0/100 - - JPC 091416-02 Field Blank 10 - - - - - - - - 0/100 - - JPC 091416-03 Inside contained work area 7 1241 1404 83 14.7 14.7 14.7 1220.1 0.002 7/100 - 0.003 JPC 091416-04 Inside contained work area 7 1242 1405 83 14.7 1.4.7 14.7 1220.1 0.002 9.5/100 - 0.005 JPC 091416-04 Duplicate Anal si 8/100 JPC QA/QC Calculation Abs Value[Sqr Root(first density)-Sqr Root(dup density)]<=2.77 x(Avg of the sq Root of the two counts)x.225 Pass/Fail Pass *If Adjusted Count is less than or equal to 5 Fibers/l00 Fields,then report Result as<LOQ. Samples will be maintained under the COC Protocol for 30 days after receipt,unless instructed otherwise. If original analysis and QC analysis are less than or equal to the analytical limit of detection of 5 Fibers/100 Fields then a Failed QC result is acceptable. (Density=(fibers/fields)/graticule area) For a 25mm filter and a Walton-Beckett G-22 with a diameter of 100um the concentration calculation is((fib/Flds)*385)/(Volume*7.85). This calculation MUST be adjusted for variables other than mentioned Work Phase: 1)Area Background 3)Asbestos Removal 5)Glove Bag Evolutions 7)Final air clearance 9)Other Associated Work 2)Pre-Abatement(Prep 4)Final Cleaning 6)Personal Air sample 8)Waste Load-Out 10)Blank Analyzed By: rl� Date: 09/14/16 Relinquished By: Date: Received By: Date: I I Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street Roston, MA 02 108•©17-292-5500 DEVAL L PATRICK RICHARD K.SULLIVAN Jl. Guvarnur. SocrUtary TIMOTHY P MURRAY KENNETH L.KIMMELL Liautanant Governor Corrimbalunar May 31,2012 Evelyn Read, Owner RE: HYANNIS Hubbard Oil Company Incorporated Release Tracking Number: 4-0000824 PO BOX 10 Hubbard Oil Hyannis, Ma 02601-0000 33 Brooks Road NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE NON-SE-12-3P-044 THIS IS AN IMPORTANT NOTICE. FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE ACTION IN RESPONSE TO THIS NOTICE COULD RESULT IN SERIOUS LEGAL CONSEQUENCES. Dear Ms. Read: The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (MassDEP), is tasked with ensuring the permanent cleanup of oil and hazardous material releases pursuant to Massachusetts General Law Chapter 21E (Chapter 21E). The law is implemented through regulations known as the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, 310 CMR 40.0000 et seq. (MCP). Through the MCP, MassDEP is currently regulating a release of oil that has occurred at the property located at 33 Brooks Road, in Hyannis, Massachusetts (the Site). MassDEP was first notified of this Site on November 01, 1989. MassDEP records indicate that you (as used in this Notice of Noncompliance (NON), "you" refers to Hubbard Oil Company Incorporated)are a Potentially Responsible Party(a PRP) for this release. This NON is provided to inform you that you are not in compliance with the MCP and outlines the provisions of the MCP that you have not complied with. Contained within the Noncompliance Summary are the necessary action(s)you must complete to return to compliance. Please be advised that there is a prescribed deadline for your completion of the action(s). MassDEP may assess a Civil Administrative Penalty in excess of several thousand dollars if you continue to be in noncompliance with the violation(s)cited herein. Notwithstanding this NON, MassDEP reserves the right to exercise the full extent of its legal authority in order to obtain full compliance with all applicable requirements, including, but not limited to, criminal prosecution, civil action including court-imposed civil penalties, or administrative penalties assessed by MassDEP. This Information Is avellabla In alternate format.Call Mlchelle Waters-Ekanam,Diversity Director,at 617-292.6161,TDD#1.866.539-7622 or 1.617.674.6868 MassDEP website:www.mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper RELEASE TRACKING NUMBER 4-0000824 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions regarding this matter, or if you would like to discuss compliance with this NON, please contact Courtland Ridings, at the letterhead address or by telephone at (508) 946-2722. All future communications regarding this matter must reference Release Tracking Number 4-0000824. Sincer Leonard J. Pinaud,Chief State&Federal Site Management Section' Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup P/CR/Ig Enclosure: Notice of Noncompliance CERTIFIED MAIL t#7010 0780 0000 6737 7560 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED W:\BWSC\DocumentArchive\4-0000824.HYANNIS.NON.05-31-2012 ec: Hyannis, Board of Health Hyannis,Chief Municipal Officer David C. Bennett, LSP Bennett Environmental Associates, Inc. dbennett@bennett-ea.com. DEP-SERO Deneen Simpson, Regional Enforcement Office Lara Goodine, BWSC—Data Entry[C&E NON] cc: DEP-SERO Attn: Regional Enforcement Office NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE NON-SE-1.2-3 P-044 RTN 4-0000824 NAME OF ENTITY IN NONCOMPLIANCE: Evelyn Read Hubbard Oil Company Incorporated PO Box 10 Hyannis, Ma 02601-0000 LOCATION WHERE NONCOMPLIANCE OCCURRED OR WAS OBSERVED: Hubbard Oil 33 Brooks Road Hyannis, Massachusetts DESCRIPTION OF REQUIRMENT(S) NOT COMPLIED WITH AND DATE(S) WHEN NONCOMPLIANCE OCCURRED OR WAS OBSERVED: On September 30, 2005, a Phase IV Completion Statement and Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Opinion were submitted to MassDEP for the Site. Subsequently, Phase V Status Reports were submitted to MassDEP for the Site.The Phase V Status Reports were prepared and submitted on your behalf by David C. Bennett, LSP, Bennett Environmental Associates, Inc. The last Phase V Status Report submitted to MassDEP was received on October 15, 2009. As of the date of this Notice, no further submittals, since the Phase V Status Report submitted to MassDEP on October 15, 2009, have been made to MassDEP related to the Site. Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(2)(f) and as described at 310 CMR 40.0892(1), Phase V Status and Remedial Monitoring Reports must be submitted to MassDEP every six months for the duration of the operation of the remedy. A Phase V Status Report and Remedial Monitoring Report were due to be submitted to MassDEP by April 15, 2010. As such, you are not in compliance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0893. In addition, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(6)(a)(1), ROS terminated at the Site on April 16, 2010. Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(6)(e), any person conducting response actions at a Site where ROS has terminated shall have two years from the date of termination to achieve a Response Action Outcome (RAO). To date, MassDEP has not received an RAO for the Site. As such, you are not in compliance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0893(6)(a)(1). DESCRIPTION AND DEADLINES OF ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN: By August 31, 2012, submit to MassDEP a Class A or C Response Action Outcome, prepared in full accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.1000. Release Tracking Number 4-0000824 NON-SE-12-3P-044 Page 2 of 2 All items must be prepared in full accordance with the MCP. . If the required actions are not completed by the deadlines specified, an administrative penalty may be assessed for every day after the date of this Notice that the noncompliance occurs or continues. The Department reserves its rights to exercise the full extent of its legal authority in order to obtain full compliance with all applicable requirements, including, but not limited to, criminal prosecution, civil action including court-imposed civil penalties, or administrative action, including administrative penalties imposed by the Department. By: Leonard J.Pinaud,Chief State&Federal Site Management Section Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Date: 3D M-ay 2 017, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108 ` COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking Number FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT 4❑ Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) A- SITE LOCATION: 1. Site Name:ATWOOD OIL (HUBBARD OIL CO INC) 2. Street Address: 133 BROOKS RD 3. City/Town:I HYANNIS 4. ZIP Code: 026010000 5. UTM Coordinates: a.UTM N: 14613090 b. UTM E: 1393827 6. Check here if a Tier Classification Submittal has been provided to DEP for this disposal site. ❑ a. Tier IA ❑ b. TierlB c. Tier IC d. Tier 11 7. If applicable,provide the Permit Number: B.THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO: (check all that apply) 1. Submit a Phase I Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484. 2. Submit a Revised Phase I Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484. 3. Submit a Phase II Scope of Work,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0834. ❑ 4. Submit an interim Phase II.Report. This report does not satisfy the response action deadline requirements in 310 CMR 40.0500. 5. Submit a final Phase II Report and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0836. 6. Submit a Revised Phase 11 Report and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0836. 7. Submit a Phase III Remedial Action Plan and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0862. ❑ 8. Submit a Revised Phase III Remedial Action Plan and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0862. ❑ 9. Submit a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0874. 10. Submit a Modified Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0874. 11. Submit an As-Built Construction Report,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0875. 12. Submit a Phase IV Status Report,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0877. 13. Submit a Phase IV Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0878 and 40.0879. Specify the outcome of Phase IV activities:(check one) a. Phase V Operation,Maintenance or Monitoring of the Comprehensive Remedial Action is necessary to achieve a Response Action Outcome. b. The requirements of a Class A Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation, Maintenance or ❑ Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. c. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation, Maintenance or Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. d. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. Further Operation,Maintenance or ❑ Monitoring of the remedial action is necessary to ensure that conditions are maintained and that further progress is made toward a Permanent Solution. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report (BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. (All sections of this transmittal form must be filled out unless otherwise noted above) Revised:2/15/2005 Page 1 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108 COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking Number FORM& PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) B.THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO(cont.): (check all that apply) ❑ 14. Submit a Revised Phase IV Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0878 and 40.0879. ❑ 15. Submit a Phase V Status Report,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0892. 16. Submit a Remedial Monitoring Report.(This report can only be submitted through eDEP.) a.Type of Report: (check one) ❑ i. Initial Report ✓❑ ii. Interim Report ® iii. Final Report b.Frequency of Submittal:(check all that apply) ❑ i. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s)submitted monthly to address an Imminent Hazard. ❑ ii. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s)submitted monthly to address a Condition of Substantial Release Migration. ❑✓ iii. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s)submitted concurrent with a Status Report. c.Status of Site:(check one) ❑ i. Phase V ✓0 ii. Remedy Operation Status ❑ iii.Class C RAO d. Number of Remedial Systems and/or Monitoring Programs: 13 A separate BWSC108A,CRA Remedial Monitoring Report,must be filled out for each Remedial System and/or Monitoring Program addressed by this transmittal form. ❑ 17. Submit a Remedy Operation Status, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893. © 18. Submit a Status Report to maintain a Remedy Operation Status,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(2). ❑ 19. Submit a Modification of a Remedy Operation Status,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(5). ❑ 20. Submit a Termination of a Remedy Operation Status,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(6). ❑ 21. Submit a Phase V Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0894. Specify the outcome of Phase V activities: (check one) a. The requirements of a Class A Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation,Maintenance or ❑ Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. b. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation,Maintenance or ❑ Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. c. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. Further Operation, Maintenance or ❑ Monitoring of the remedial action is necessary to ensure that conditions are maintained and/or that further progress is made toward a Permanent Solution. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. 022. Submit a Revised Phase V Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0894. ❑ 23. Submit a Post-Class C Response Action Outcome Status Report,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0898. (All sections of this transmittal form must be filled out unless otherwise noted above) Revised: 2/15/2005 Page 2 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108 COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking Number FORM& PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT �r{ 4' - 824 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) C. LSP SIGNATURE AND STAMP: I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with this transmittal form, including any and all documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based upon application of(i)the standard of care in 309 CMR 4.02(1), (ii)the applicable provisions of 309 CMR 4.02(2)and(3),and 309 CMR 4.03(2),and (iii)the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(3),to the best of my knowledge,information and belief, > if Section B indicates that a Phase/,Phase ll,Phase/I/,Phase IV or Phase V Completion Statement is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(1)has(have)been developed and implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,and(iii) comply(ies)with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals identified in this submittal; > if Section B indicates that a Phase II Scope of Work or a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(i)has(have)been developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000, (ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,and(iii)comply(ies)with the identified provisions of all orders, permits,and approvals identified in this submittal; > if Section B indicates that an As-Built Construction Report,a Remedy Operation Status,a Phase IV,Phase V or Post-Class C RAO Status Report,a Status Report to Maintain a Remedy Operation Status and/or a Remedial Monitoring Report is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(i)is(are)being implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,and(iii)comply(ies) with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals identified in this submittal. am aware that significant penalties may result,including,but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment,if I submit information which I know to be false, inaccurate or materially incomplete. 1. LSP#: 14303 1 2. First Name: DAVID'C' 3. Last Name: BENNETT` 4. Telephone: 5088961706 5. Ext.: 6. FAX: 7. Signature: David C Bennett ealth of Mas 103/30/2009' —� 8. Date: 9.LSP Stamp: F� , �� (mm/dd/yyyy) & Electronic Seal o 5 Revised: 2/15/2005 Page 3 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108 COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking Number !FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT 4❑ - 824 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) D. PERSON UNDERTAI KING RESPONSE ACTIONS: 1. Check all that apply: 11 a.change in contact name ❑ b.change of address c. change in the person undertaking response actions 2. Name of Organization: HUBBARD OIL COMPANY INC 3. Contact First Name: EVELYN 4. Last Name: READ 5. Street: PO BOX 10 6.Title: 7. City/Town: HYANNIS 8. State: MA 9. ZIP Code: 026010000 10. Telephone: 8002877103 11.Ext.: 12. FAX: E. RELATIONSHIP TO SITE OF PERSON UNDERTA UNG RESPONSE ACTIONS: Q✓ 1. RP or PRP ❑ a. Owner ❑✓ b. Operator c. Generator d. Transporter ❑ e. Other RP or PRP Specify: 2. Fiduciary,Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status(as defined by M.G.L.c.21 E,s.2) 3. Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way(as defined by M.G.L.c.21 E,s.50)) 4. Any Other Person Undertaking Response Actions Specify Relationship: F. REQUIRED ATTACHMENT AND SUBMITTALS: 1. Check here if the Response Action(s)on which this opinion is based,if any,are(were)subject to any order(s), permit(s) and/or approval(s)issued by DEP or EPA. If the box is checked,you MUST attach a statement identifying the applicable provisions thereof. 0✓ 2. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the submittal of any Phase Reports to DEP. ❑✓ 3. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the availability of a Phase III Remedial Action Plan. ✓ 4. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the availability of a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan. a5. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of any field work involving the implementation of a Phase IV Remedial Action. 6. If submitting a Modification of a Remedy Operation Status,check here to certify that a statement detailing the compliance history,as per 310 CMR 40.0893(5),for the person making this submittal is attached. Ei7. If submitting a Modification of a Remedy Operation Status,check here to certify that written consent of the person who submitted the Remedy Operation Status submittal,as per 310 CMR 40.0893(5), is attached. o8. Check here if any non-updatable information provided on this form is incorrect,e.g.Site Name. Send corrections to the DEP Regional Office. 0 9. Check here to certify that the LSP Opinion containing the material facts,data,and other information is attached. Revised: 2/15/2005 Page 4 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108 :COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking Number IL FORM& PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) G. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON UNDERTA UNG RESPONSE ACTIONS: 1. I,Evelyn Read ,attest under the pains and penalties of perjury(i)that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal, including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form, (ii)that,based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information,the material information contained in this submittal is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate and complete,and(iii) that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the entity legally responsible for this submittal. I/the person or entity on whose behalf this submittal is made am/is aware that there are significant penalties,including,but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment,for willfully submitting false,inaccurate,or incomplete information. 2. By. Evelyn Read 3. Title: GENERAL MANAGER Signature 4. For: JHUBBARD OIL COMPANY INC 5. Date: 03/30/2009 (Name of person or entity recorded in Section D) (mm/dd/yyyy) ® 6. Check here if the address of the person providing certification is different from address recorded in Section D. 7. Street: 8. City/Town: 9. State: 10. ZIP Code: 11. Telephone: 12.Ext.: 13. FAX: YOU ARE SUBJECT TO AN ANNUAL COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE FEE OF UP TO$10,000 PER BILLABLE YEAR FOR THIS DISPOSAL SITE. YOU MUST LEGIBLY COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THIS FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMENT AS INCOMPLETE. IF YOU SUBMIT AN INCOMPLETE FORM,YOU MAY BE PENALIZED FOR MISSING A REQUIRED DEADLINE. Date Stamp(DEP USE ONLY:) Received by DEP on 3/30/2009 6:05:39 PM Revised: 2/15/2005 Page 5 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108A IL CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H) Remedial System or Monitoring Program: 0 of:0 A. DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM: 1. Type of Active Remedial System or Active Remedial Monitoring Program:(check all that apply) ❑ a. Active Remedial System: (check all that apply) ❑ i.NAPL Recovery ❑ ii. Soil Vapor Extraction/Bioventing ® iii. Vapor-phase Carbon Adsorption ❑ iv.Groundwater Recovery ❑ v. Dual/Multi-phase Extraction ❑ vi. Aqueous-phase Carbon Adsorption ❑ vii.Air Stripping ❑ viii. Sparging/Biosparging ❑ ix. Cat/Thermal Oxidation ❑ x. Other Describe: ✓0 b. Application of Remedial Additives:(check all that apply) ✓❑ i.To the Subsurface ❑ ii. To Groundwater(Injection) ❑ iii. To the Surface c. Active Remedial Monitoring Program Without the Application of Remedial Additives:(check all that apply;Sections C,D ❑ and E are not required;attach supporting information,data,maps and/or sketches needed by checking Section F5) ❑ i. Reactive Wall ❑ ii. Natural Attenuation ❑ iii. Other Describe: 2. Mode of Operation:(check one) ❑ a. Continuous ❑ b. Intermittent ❑ c. Pulsed ❑✓ d. one-time Event Only ❑ e. Other: 3. System Effluent/Discharge:(check all that apply) ❑ a.Sanitary Sewer/POTW b.Groundwater Re-infiltration/Re-injection: (check one) ❑ i. Downgradient ❑ ii.Upgradient ❑ c. Vapor-phase Discharge to Ambient Air:(check one) ❑ i. Off-gas Controls ❑ ii. No Off-gas Controls ® d. Drinking Water Supply ❑ e. Surface Water(including Storm Drains) ❑ f. Other Describe: B. MONITORING FREQUENCY: 1. Reporting period that is the subject of this submittal: From: 8/16/2008 To: 3/17/2009 (mm/dd/yyyy) (mm/dd/yyyy) 2. Number of monitoring events during the reporting period:(check one) ❑ a.System Startup:(if applicable) ❑ i. Days 1,3,6,and then weekly thereafter,for the first month. ❑ ii. Other Describe: ❑✓ b.Post-system Startup(after first month)or Monitoring Program: ❑ i.Monthly ❑ ii.Quarterly ❑✓ iii. Other Describe: BI-ANNUALLY BASED ON PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE 3. Check here to certify that the number of required monitoring events were conducted during the reporting period. C. EFFLUENT/DISCHARGE REGULATION:(check one to indicate how the effluent/discharge limits were established) 1.NPDES: (check one) ❑ a. Remediation General Permit ❑ b. Individual Permit ❑ c.Emergency Exclusion Effective Date of Permit: mm/dd ❑ 2. MCP Performance Standard MCP Citations(s): ❑ 3. DEP Approval Letter Date of Letter: mm/dd/ ❑✓ 4. Other Describe: MA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MAGNESIUM Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 1 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108A CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Release Tracking Number L7 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H) Remedial System or Monitoring Program: 1 1 of:0 D. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR:(check one) 1. Required due to Remedial Wastewater Treatment Plant in place for more than 30 days. a. Name: b. Grade: c.License No.: d. License Exp.Date: 2. Not Required (mm/dd/yyyy) Q✓ 3. Not Applicable E. STATUS OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM DURING REPORTING PERIOD: (check all that apply) 1.The Active Remedial System was functional one or more days during the Reporting Period. a. Days System was Fully Functional: F I b.GW Recovered(gals): c. NAPL Recovered(gals): d.GW Discharged(gals): e.Avg.Soil Gas Recovery Rate(scfm): I f. Avg.Sparging Rate(scfm) Q 2.Remedial Additives:(check all that apply) El a. No Remedial Additives applied during the Reporting Period. ❑✓ b. Enhanced Bioremediation Additives applied:(total quantity applied at the site for the current reporting period) ❑ i.Nitrogen/Phosphorus: Q ii. Peroxides: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units ORC ADVANCED s712008 500 LBS ❑ iii.Microorganisms: iv.Other: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units c. Chemical oxidation/reduction additives applied:(total quantity applied at the site for the current reporting period) Fj i. Permanganates: ❑ ii.Peroxides: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units iii.Persulfates: iv.Other: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 2 of 3 LEMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108A CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H)� El - 824 Remedial System or Monitoring Program: I L of:0 E. STATUS OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM DURING REPORTING PERIOD:(cont.) (check all that apply) d.Other additives applied:(total quantity applied at the site for the current reporting period) Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units e. Check here if any additional Remedial Additives were applied. Attach list of additional additives and include Name of Additive,Date Applied,Quantity Applied and Units(in gals.or lbs.) F. SHUTDOWNS OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM:(check all that apply) 1. The Active Remedial System had unscheduled shutdowns on one or more occasions during the Reporting Period. a. Number of Unscheduled Shutdowns: b.Total Number of Days of Unscheduled Shutdowns: c.Reason(s)for Unscheduled Shutdowns: ❑ 2. The Active Remedial System had scheduled shutdowns on one or more occasions during the Reporting Period. a. Number of Scheduled Shutdowns: 0 b.Total Number of Days of Scheduled Shutdowns: c. Reason(s)for Scheduled Shutdowns: Ei 3. The Active Remedial System or Active Remedial Monitoring Program was permanently shutdown/discontinued during the Reporting Period. a.Date of Final System or Monitoring Program Shutdown: (mm/dd/yyyy) ® b. No Further Effluent Discharges. c. No Further Application of Remedial Additives planned;sufficient monitoring completed to demonstrate compliance with 310 CMR 40.0046. E] d. No Further Submittals Planned. e. Other: Describe: G. SUMMARY STATEMENTS:(check all that apply for the current reporting period) a1. All Active Remedial System checks and effluent analyses required by the approved plan and/or permit were performed when applicable. Li2. There were no significant problems or prolonged(>25%of reporting period)unscheduled shutdowns of the Active Remedial System. ❑� 3. The Active Remedial System or Active Remedial Monitoring Program operated i n conformance with the MCP,and all applicable approval conditions and/or permits. 4. Indicate any Operational Problems or Notes: 0 5. Check here if additional/supporting Information,data,maps,and/or sketches are attached to the form. Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 3 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC108 B Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Release Tracking Number. CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT 0 - 824 r L771 �EFFLUENT/DISCHARGE CONCENTRATIONS Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H) Remedial System or Monitoring Program: L_ of:0 For each Point of Measurement,indicate the highest concentration detected during the reporting period,of each oil,hazardous material and/or remedial additive. Influent Midpoint (check one) Check Within Point of Date Contaminant,Measurement and/or Concentraion Concentration El Discharge here,if Units Permissible Permissible Measurement (mm/dd/yyyy) Indicator Parameter (where (where ✓❑ Groundwater ND/BDL Concentration Limits? applicable) applicable) Concentration (Y/N) MW-5S 11/20/2008 MAGNESIUM 1.6 ❑ 10 MG/L Yes MW-6S 11/20/2008 MAGNESIUM 1.9 ❑ 110 MG/L Yes GZA-2 11/20/2008 MAGNESIUM 1.2 110 MG/L Yes ❑ ❑ D ❑ ❑ MG/KG ID ❑ Check here if an additional BWSC108B, Effluent/Discharge Concentrations Form,is needed. Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 1 of 1 L71Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108A 1!CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H) �� El - 824 Remedial System or Monitoring Program: L 1 of:0 A. DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM: 1. Type of Active Remedial System or Active Remedial Monitoring Program:(check all that apply) ❑ a. Active Remedial System: (check all that apply) ❑ L NAPL Recovery ❑ ii. Soil Vapor Extra cti on/Bi oventi n g ❑ iii. Vapor-phase Carbon Adsorption ❑ iv.Groundwater Recovery ❑ v. Dual/Multi-phase Extraction ❑ vi. Aqueous-phase Carbon Adsorption ❑ vii.Air Stripping ❑ viii. Sparging/Biosparging ❑ ix. Cat/Thermal Oxidation ❑ X. Other Describe: ✓❑ b. Application of Remedial Additives:(check all that apply) ✓❑ L To the Subsurface ❑ ii. To Groundwater(Injection) ❑ iii. To the Surface c. Active Remedial Monitoring Program Without the Application of Remedial Additives:(check all that apply;Sections C, D and E are not required;attach supporting information,data,maps and/or sketches needed by checking Section F5) ❑ L Reactive Wall ❑ ii. Natural Attenuation ❑ iii. Other Describe: 2. Mode of Operation:(check one) ❑ a. Continuous ❑ b. Intermittent ❑ c. Pulsed ❑ d. One-time Event Only ✓❑ e. Other: BI-ANNUAL=Y 3. System Effluent/Discharge:(check all that apply) ❑ a.Sanitary Sewer/POTW ❑ b.Groundwater Re-infiltration/Re-injection:(check one) ❑ L Downgradient ❑ ii. Upgradient ❑ c. Vapor-phase Discharge to Ambient Air:(check one) ❑ L Off-gas Controls ❑ ii. No Off-gas Controls ❑✓ d. Drinking Water Supply ❑ e. Surface Water(including Storm Drains) ❑ f. Other Describe: B. MONITORING FREQUENCY: 1. Reporting period that is the subject of this submittal: From: 8/1 (mm/dd/yyyy) To: 3/17/2009 mm/d (mm/dd/yyyy) 2. Number of monitoring events during the reporting period:(check one) ❑ a.System Startup:(if applicable) ❑ i. Days 1,3,6,and then weekly thereafter,for the first month. ❑ ii. Other Describe: Qb.Post-system Startup(after first month)or Monitoring Program: ❑ i. Monthly ❑ ii.Quarterly 0✓ iii. Other Describe: BI-ANNUALLY BASED ON PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE 3. Check here to certify that the number of required monitoring events were conducted during the reporting period. C. EFFLUENTIDISCHARGE REGULATION:(check one to indicate how the effluent/discharge limits were established) 1.NPDES:(check one) ❑ a. Remediation General Permit ❑ b. Individual Permit ❑ c.Emergency Exclusion Effective Date of Permit: mm/dd ❑ 2. MCP Performance Standard MCP Citations(s): ❑ 3. DEP Approval Letter Date of Letter: mm/dd ❑✓ 4. Other Describe: MA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 1 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108A CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CM 40.0800(SUBPART H) Remedial System or Monitoring Program: of:0 D. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR:(check one) ❑ 1. Required due to Remedial Wastewater Treatment Plant in place for more than 30 days. a. Name: b. Grade: c.License No.: d.License Exp.Date: ❑ 2. Not Required (mm/dd/yyyy) Q 3. Not Applicable E. STATUS OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM DURING REPORTING PERIOD: (check all that apply) ❑ 1.The Active Remedial System was functional one or more days during the Reporting Period. a. Days System was Fully Functional: b.GW Recovered(gals): c. NAPL Recovered(gals): I d.GW Discharged(gals): e.Avg.Soil Gas Recovery Rate(scfm): f. Avg.Sparging Rate(scfm): a 2.Remedial Additives:(check all that apply) Fla. No Remedial Additives applied during the Reporting Period. Qb.Enhanced Bioremediation Additives applied:(total quantity applied at the site for the current reporting period) ❑✓ i. Nitrogen/Phosphorus: . ❑ ii.Peroxides: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units MIRACLE GROW 9112/2008 20 GALS ❑ iii. Microorganisms: ❑ iv.Other: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units ❑ c.Chemical oxidation/reduction additives applied:(total quantity applied at the site for the current reporting period) ❑ i. Permanganates: ❑ ii. Peroxides: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units ❑ iii.Persulfates: ❑ iv.other: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 2 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108A CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H)�--� �---� El - 824 F6L. Remedial System or Monitoring Program: l'-1 of:l�J E. STATUS OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM DURING REPORTING PERIOD:(cont.) (check all that apply) d.Other additives applied:(total quantity applied at the site for the current reporting period) Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units e. Check here if any additional Remedial Additives were applied. Attach list of additional additives and include Name El of Additive,Date Applied,Quantity Applied and Units(in gals.or lbs.) F. SHUTDOWNS OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM:(check all that apply) 1. The Active Remedial System had unscheduled shutdowns on one or more occasions during the Reporting Period. a. Number of Unscheduled Shutdowns: b.Total Number of Days of Unscheduled Shutdowns: c. Reason(s)for Unscheduled Shutdowns: 2. The Active Remedial System had scheduled shutdowns on one or more occasions during the Reporting Period. a.Number of Scheduled Shutdowns: b.Total Number of Days of Scheduled Shutdowns: c.Reason(s)for Scheduled Shutdowns: 3. The Active Remedial System or Active Remedial Monitoring Program was permanently shutdown/discontinued during the Reporting Period. a.Date of Final System or Monitoring Program Shutdown: (mm/dd/yyyy) ® b. No Further Effluent Discharges. c. No Further Application of Remedial Additives planned;sufficient monitoring completed to demonstrate compliance ❑ with 310 CMR 40.0046. d. No Further Submittals Planned. e. Other: Describe: G. SUMMARY STATEMENTS:(check all that apply for the current reporting period) a1. All Active Remedial System checks and effluent analyses required by the approved plan and/or permit were performed when applicable. 2. There were no significant problems or prolonged(>25%of reporting period)unscheduled shutdowns of the Active Remedial System. 3. The Active Remedial System or Active Remedial Monitoring Program operated in conformance with the MCP,and all applicable approval conditions and/or permits. 4. Indicate any Operational Problems or Notes: [� 5. Check here if additional/supporting Information,data,maps,and/or sketches are attached to the form. Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 3 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC108 B Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Release Tracking Number, CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT (EFFLUENT/DISCHARGE CONCENTRATIONS Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H) Remedial System or Monitoring Program: � J of:0 For each Point of Measurement,indicate the highest concentration detected during the reporting period,of each oil,hazardous material and/or remedial additive. Influent Midpoint (check one) Check Within Point of Date Contaminant, Measurement and/or Concentraion Concentration ❑ Discharge here,if Permissible Permissible Measurement (mm/dd/yyyy) Indicator Parameter (where (where ✓❑ Groundwater ND/BDL Concentrati Units on Limits? applicable) applicable) Concentration (Y/N) MW-5S 11/20/20087 NITRATE 1.5 ❑ 10 MG/L Yes MW-5S 11/20/2008 PHOSPHORUS ✓❑ Yes MW-6S 11/20/2008 NITRATE 1.9 110 MG/L Yes MW-6S 11/20/2008 PHOSPHORUS Yes GZA-2 11/20/2008 NITRATE 0.33 110 MG/L Yes GZA-2 11/20/2008 PHOSPHORUS ❑✓ Yes El El El El El El ❑ MG/KG Check here if an additional BWSC108B, Effluent/Discharge Concentrations Form,is needed. Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 1 of 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108A CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H) 4❑ Remedial System or Monitoring Program: of:0 A. DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM: 1. Type of Active Remedial System or Active Remedial Monitoring Program:(check all that apply) 0 a. Active Remedial System:(check all that apply) ❑ i.NAPL Recovery ❑✓ ii. Soil Vapor Extra ction/Bioventing ❑✓ iii. Vapor-phase Carbon Adsorption ❑ iv.Groundwater Recovery ❑ v. Dual/Multi-phase Extraction ❑ vi. Aqueous-phase Carbon Adsorption ❑ vii.Air Stripping ❑✓ viii. Sparging/Biosparging ❑ ix. Cat/Thermal Oxidation ❑ x. Other Describe: ❑ b. Application of Remedial Additives:(check all that apply) i.To the Subsurface ❑ ii. To Groundwater(Injection) ❑ iii. To the Surface c. Active Remedial Monitoring Program Without the Application of Remedial Additives:(check all that apply;Sections C,D and E are not required;attach supporting information,data,maps and/or sketches needed by checking Section F5) ❑ I.Reactive Wall ❑ ii. Natural Attenuation ❑ iii. Other Describe: 2. Mode of Operation:(check one) a. Continuous ❑ b. Intermittent ❑✓ c. Pulsed d. One-time Event Only ❑ e. Other: 3. System Effluent/Discharge:(check all that apply) ❑ a.Sanitary Sewer/POTW ❑ b.Groundwater Re-infiltration/Re-injection:(check one) ❑ i. Downgradient ❑ ii. Upgradient ❑✓ c. Vapor-phase Discharge to Ambient Air: (check one) I. Off-gas Controls ❑ ii. No Off-gas Controls ❑ d. Drinking Water Supply ❑ e. Surface Water(including Storm Drains) ❑ f. Other Describe: B. MONITORING FREQUENCY: 1. Reporting period that is the subject of this submittal: From: 8/1 (mm/d To: 3/17/2009 (mm/dd/yyyy) (mm/dd/yyyy) 2. Number of monitoring events during the reporting period:(check one) ❑ a.System Startup:(if applicable) ❑ i. Days 1,3,6,and then weekly thereafter,for the first month. ❑ ii. Other Describe: ❑✓ b.Post-system Startup(after first month)or Monitoring Program: ❑ i.Monthly ❑ ii.Quarterly ✓❑ iii. Other Describe: SINGLE MONITORING EVENT DUE TO SYSTEM SHUTDOWN ❑✓ 3. Check here to certify that the number of required monitoring events were conducted during the reporting period. C. EFFLUENTIDISCHARGE REGULATION:(check one to indicate how the effluent/discharge limits were established) ❑ 1.NPDES: (check one) ❑ a. Remediation General Permit ❑ b. Individual Permit ❑ c.Emergency Exclusion Effective Date of Permit: mm/dd/ ❑ 2. MCP Performance Standard MCP Citations(s): ❑ 3. DEP Approval Letter Date of Letter: mm/dd ❑✓ 4. Other Describe: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 1 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108A CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H) 4F Remedial System or Monitoring Program: of:l�1 D. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR:(check one) 1. Required due to Remedial Wastewater Treatment Plant in place for more than 30 days. a. Name: b. Grade: c. License No.: d.License Exp. Date: 2. Not Required (mm/dd/yyyy) Q 3. Not Applicable E. STATUS OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM DURING REPORTING PERIOD: (check all that apply) ❑✓ 1.The Active Remedial System was functional one or more days during the Reporting Period. a. Days System was Fully Functional: 120 1 b.GW Recovered(gals): c. NAPL Recovered(gals): d.GW Discharged(gals): e.Avg.Soil Gas Recovery Rate(scfm): 150 f. Avg.Sparging Rate(scfm): 135 2.Remedial Additives:(check all that apply) ❑ a.No Remedial Additives applied during the Reporting Period. b.Enhanced Bioremediation Additives applied:(total quantity applied at the site for the current reporting period) i. Nitrogen/Phosphorus: ii.Peroxides: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units iii.Microorganisms: iv.Other: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity jUnits c.Chemical oxidation/reduction additives applied:(total quantity applied at the site for the current reporting period) i.Permanganates: ❑ ii.Peroxides: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units iii.Persulfates: iv.Other: Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 2 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108A CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H) El - 824 Remedial System or Monitoring Program: Q of:0 E. STATUS OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM DURING REPORTING PERIOD:(cont.) (check all that apply) d.Other additives applied:(total quantity applied.at the site for the current reporting period) Name of Additive Date Quantity Units Name of Additive Date Quantity Units ❑ e. Check here if any additional Remedial Additives were applied. Attach list of additional additives and include Name of Additive,Date Applied,Quantity Applied and Units(in gals.or lbs.) F. SHUTDOWNS OF ACTIVE REMEDIAL SYSTEM OR ACTIVE REMEDIAL MONITORING PROGRAM:(check all that apply) 1. The Active Remedial System had unscheduled shutdowns on one or more occasions during the Reporting Period. a. Number of Unscheduled Shutdowns: b.Total Number of Days of Unscheduled Shutdowns: c. Reason(s)for Unscheduled Shutdowns: 2. The Active Remedial System had scheduled shutdowns on one or more occasions during the Reporting Period. a.Number of Scheduled Shutdowns: 0 b.Total Number of Days of Scheduled Shutdowns: c. Reason(s)for Scheduled Shutdowns: 0 3. The Active Remedial System or Active Remedial Monitoring Program was permanently shutdown/discontinued during the Reporting Period. a.Date of Final System or Monitoring Program Shutdown: 9/12/2008 (mm/dd/yyyy) ® b. No Further Effluent Discharges. c. No Further Application of Remedial Additives planned;sufficient monitoring completed to demonstrate compliance with 310 CMR 40.0046. El d. No Further Submittals Planned. 21 e. Other: Describe: BIOVENTING AND AIR SPARGING SYSTEM SUSPENDED INDEFINITELY G. SUMMARY STATEMENTS:(check all that apply for the current reporting period) 1. All Active Remedial System checks and effluent analyses required by the approved plan and/or permit were performed when applicable. ❑ 2. There were no significant problems or prolonged(>25%of reporting period)unscheduled shutdowns of the Active Remedial System. 3. The Active Remedial System or Active Remedial Monitoring Program operated in conformance with the MCP,and all applicable approval conditions and/or permits. 4. Indicate any Operational Problems or Notes: 5. Check here if additional/supporting Information,data,maps,and/or sketches are attached to the form. Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 3 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC108 B Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Release Tracking Numbe: CRA REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT EFFLUENT/DISCHARGE CONCENTRATIONS Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0800(SUBPART H) Remedial System or Monitoring Program: L� of:0 For each Point of Measurement,indicate the highest concentration detected during the reporting period,of each oil,hazardous material and/or remedial additive. Influent Midpoint (check one) Check Within Point of Date Contaminant,Measurement and/or Concentraion Concentration ✓0 Discharge here if Permissible Permissible ND/BDL, Measurement (mm/dd/yyyy) Indicator Parameter (where (where Groundwater Concentrati Units on Limits? applicable) applicable) Concentration (Y/N) MANIFOLD 9/12/2008 TOTAL ORGANIC VOLATILES 32.6 0.1 0.1 ❑ 35 PPMV Yes ELI El El MG/KG Check here if an additional BWSC10813,Effluent/Discharge Concentrations Form,is needed. Revised: 2/9/2005 Page 1 of 1 eDEP -MassDEP's OnlineFiling System Pagel of 2 MassDEP Home i Contact I Feedback i Tour i Privacy Policy MassDEP's Online Filing System Username:DAVIDBENNETT V My eDEP I Forms im; My Profile lam, Help Receipt immmmmom Forms Attach Files Signature Receipt Summary/Receipt print receipt, Exit Your submission is complete. Thank you for using DEP's online reporting system. You can select "My eDEP" to see a list of your transactions. DEP Transaction ID: 233321 Date and Time Submitted: 3/30/2009 6:05:39 PM Other Email BWSC Remedial Monitoring Report(A) BWSC Remedial Monitoring Report(A) BWSC Remedial Monitoring Report(A) BWSC Remedial Monitoring Report B() BWSC Remedial Monitoring Report B() BWSC Remedial Monitoring Report B() Form Name: BWSC108 CRA Transmittal Form&Phase I CS RTN: 4-824 Location: ATWOOD OIL (HUBBARD OIL CO INC) Address: 33 BROOKS RD,HYANNIS, 026010000 Person Making Submittal HUBBARD OIL COMPANY INC EVELYN READ PO BOX 10 HYANNIS, MA 026010000 LSP LSP#: 4303 LSP Name:DAVID C BENNETT Person Making Certification HUBBARD OIL COMPANY INC Evelyn Read HUBBARD OIL COMPANY INC Evelyn Read https:Hedep.dep.mass.gov/Pages/PrintReceipt.aspx 3/30/2101 1BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS,ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS,GEOLOGISTS,SANITARIANS 1573 Main Street,P.O. Bog 1743 (508)896-1706 Brewster,MA 02631 fax(508)896-5109 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: DATE: JOB NUMBER: MA DEP-SERO 04/01/2009 BEA02-3490 Mr.Gerard Martin,Section Chief BWSC SMP 20 Riverside Drive REGARDING: Lakeville,MA 02347 PHASE V STATUS REPORT TO MAINTAIN REMEDY OPERATION STATUS WITH REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT SHIPPING METHOD: Hubbard Oil Company,Inc.-RTN 4-0824(Linked to RTN#4-15370) 33 and 51 Brooks Road[Assessors Map 328,Parcel 125 and 126] Regular Mail ❑ Pick Up ❑ Hyannis,MA 02601 Priority Mail ❑ Hand Deliver ❑ Express Mail ❑ Other uploaded ❑X Certified Mail ❑ Green Card/RR ❑ COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 03/26/2009 PHASE V STATUS REPORT TO MAINTAIN REMEDY OPERATION STATUS WITH REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Hubbard Oil Company,Inc.-RTN 4-0824(Linked to RTN#4-15370) o -� 33 and 51 Brooks Road[Assessors Map 328,Parcel 125 and 126] � a MW Hyannis,MA 02601 0 O > Z -'0 For review and comment: ❑ For approval: ❑ As requested: ❑ Fob' youmuse: 0 co m REMARKS. cc: Hubbard Oil,Inc.-Attn:Evelyn Read,General Manager (full report) Robert A.Fasanella,Esq.-RUBIN&RUDMAN,LLP(full report) Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department (narrative,title page,site plan,transmittals only) Thomas McKean-Barnstable Board of Health(narrative,title page,site plan,transmittals only) John Klimm-Barnstable Town Manager(narrative,title page,site plan,transmittals only) John Robichaud,Abutter-Robie's Refrigeration(narrative,title page,site plan,transmittals only) FROM: If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once I BENNETTENVIRONMENTAL 'AssOC'IA' TES,' INC.' LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 0 GEOLOGISTS 0 SANITARIANS 1573 Main Street- P.O. Box 1743, Brewster, MA 02631 6 508-896-1706 6 Fax 508-896-5109 0 www.benneft-ea.com BEA02-3490 March 26, 2009 Mr. Gerard Martin, Section Chief Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC)/Sites Management Program(SMP) MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION(MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office (SERO) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 RE: PHASE V STATUS REPORT TO MAINTAIN REMEDY OPERATION STATUS WITH REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Hubbard Oil Company.Inc. - RTN 4-0824 (Linked to RTN#4-15370) 33 and 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328, Parcel 125 and 126] Hyannis, MA 02601 Dear Mr. Martin: On behalf of our client, Hubbard Oil, Inc., BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. (herein referred to as BEA) has prepared this Phase V Status Report to maintain Remedy Operation Status for the above referenced Site in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0892. This filing documents the remedial response actions and environmental monitoring activities conducted at the Site over the past six (6) months associated with the shutdown of the active bioventing remedial system, and suspension of the use in remedial additives towards the recognition that it is infeasible to meet a Class A Response Action Outcome objective as a Permanent Solution wherein GW-1 standards must be achieved. As such, this Phase V Status Report provides the final Remedial Monitoring Report for the active remedial system and use of remedial additives and outlines the continuation of environmental monitoring to evaluate natural attenuation without the benefit of the active remedial systems and use of remedial additives. Additional targeted soil and groundwater sampling is proposed herein to further evaluate Substantial Hazards towards a Class C-1, Response Action Outcome. During the past six month reporting period, laboratory analysis of the downgradient monitoring wells have reported fractional Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon (EPH) and target analyte concentrations indicated concentrations below reporting limits (BRL), as well as significantly below the applicable and most restrictive GW-1, Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. Downgradient monitoring wells also reported concentrations of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH) as BRL or as trace concentrations, significantly below the applicable GW-1 Standards absolving any condition of Substantial Release Migration(SRM) or practical ingestion exposures associated with the consumption of impacted drinking water. Remedial efforts under response actions taken over the past five years have resulted in the reduction of contaminant source as concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils and groundwater. Environmental 1 EMERGENCY SPILL RESPONSE Q WASTE SITE CLEANUP Q SITE ASSESSMENT Q ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING 0 LAND USE PLANNING WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT,OPERATION&MAINTENANCE 6 WASTEWATER TREATMENT,OPERATION&MAINTENANCE MARCH 26,2009 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 2 OF 11 PHASE V STATUS REPORT monitoring has characterized "lines of evidence" for stable environmental conditions and attenuation of the dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbon plume as documentation of No Substantial Hazard. In September 2008, BEA terminated the air sparging system and the active bioventing system, in favor of a passive venting system to further evaluate any potential Substantial Hazard in the absence of an active remedial system. During the reporting period, groundwater impacts remained stable or continued to be further attenuating. The reactive barrier at the downgradient property line has an expected lifetime of 12 months and will continue to provide oxygen to the subsurface and shallow groundwater through May 2009. Following the depletion of the reactive barrier future groundwater monitoring of downgradient and interior monitoring wells will evaluate any potential Substantial Release Migration and Substantial Hazard in the absence of remedial additives. Over the next reporting period BEA will perform additional EPH/VPH sampling of shallow soils to compare with the Method 2 Direct Contact Exposure Criteria, to evaluate any potential Substantial Hazards and the reliance on the locked gate surrounding the property to prevent any potential exposure to human receptors. Subsequent to the additional assessment and monitoring, BEA may terminate the Remedy Operation Status and file a Phase V Completion Report in moving towards a Class C-1 RAO as a Temporary Solution. This Phase V Status Report is an addendum to, and an essential part of, the public record for Site characterization, risk assessment of exposure pathways and corrective remedial efforts under Comprehensive Response Actions as a Tier 1 C Site. For the purposes of this Report, the previous information offered is omitted as redundant and summarized only to orient the reader. For specific information on historic environmental assessment activities and remedial response actions, the reader should reference the "Phase I Limited Site Investigation" [LCR (2/20/90)], "Phase I - Initial Site Investigation with Tier Classification" [RAM (8/9/96)], "Immediate Response Action Completion Report" [SEA (8/11/00)], and the Phase II Scope of Work (9/20/02), Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Completion Statement(11/18/02), and Phase III Identification, Evaluation and Selection of Comprehensive Response Actions (2/18/03), Phase IV Implementation of Selected Remedial Action Alternatives (6/23/03), Remedy Operation Status Report I (12/30/03), through Remedy Operation Status Report III (3/8/05), Phase IV Completion Statement, Remedy Operation Status Report IV (9/27/05), Remedy Operation Status V (3/16/06) Remedy Operation Status VI (9/7/06), Remedy Operation Status Report VII(3/7/07), Remedy Operation Status Report VIII (9/17/07), Remedy Operation Status Report IX (3/21/08) and the most recent Remedy Operation Status Report X (9/17/08) documents prepared by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. as filed with the MA DEP (SERO). As of January 28, 2008, BEA became the successor to BENNETT& O'REILLY,INC. The work represented within this document, has proceeded under my supervision in a manner consistent with 309 CMR 4.02 (2), the MCP Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS), pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0191 and Quality Assurance/Quality Control policies of BEA. The facts and statements herein are, to the best of our knowledge, a true and accurate representation of the current Site activities, remedial response actions and environmental conditions associated with the project. As such, this document serves as the technical i l MARCH 26,2009 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 3 OF 11 PHASE V STATUS REPORT justification and rationale for the LSP Opinions represented by the certifications on the Comprehensive Response Action transmittal forms attached relative to current regulations and standard of care practices at the time of filing. PHASE V OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Consistent with the Operation, Maintenance and Environmental Monitoring Plan set forth, BEA performed periodic Site inspections during the reporting period to monitor operations and perform maintenance on the active bio-venting and air-sparging treatment systems in use at the subject Site. These inspections were further utilized to assess environmental conditions and conduct prescribed groundwater sampling in consideration of remedial system performance and exposure risks. Two Site inspections were conducted on September 12, 2008 and November 20, 2008. These inspections, and specific daily activities, are documented on field reports in Appendix B and the RMR transmittal forms. The following is a summary of significant events during the past six months. SITE INSPECTIONS Reactive Barrier On May 7, 2008, BEA personnel were at the site with ADH drilling to replenish the reactive barrier at the downgradient property line. The reactive barrier consisted of 500 lbs. of Regenesis' Oxygen Releasing Compound Advanced (ORC-A) injected to the groundwater interface between 23 to 25 feet below grade surface (bgs) at the downgradient property line and within each of the source areas in Zone A and Zone B, as recommended by Regenesis. During the sampling event on November 20, 2008, downgradient monitoring wells MW- 5S, MW-6S(R) and GZA-2 on the Robies Refrigeration property were sampled for remedial additive use pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0046 and as specified in the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan. No adverse impacts associated with remedial additive use have been observed as measured by magnesium, which is the primary compound of ORC. Given the longevity of ORC-Advanced is estimated at up to 12 months, BEA has evaluated the effectiveness of the additive by monitoring dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations in these downgradient monitoring wells [Refer to the Environmental Monitoring section of this report]. Based on the elevated concentrations of DO reported, it appears that the ORC is still active and there is currently no plan to replenish the remedial additives at this time. Additional field-testing, groundwater sampling and analysis of interior well water quality in May 2009,will be used in the consideration Substantial Hazards with the depletion of the remedial additive and in the absence of active bioventing. Bioventing System Over the past three years of operation, concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil have been reduced to below the applicable S2 and S3/GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1 Risk 1 MARCH 26,2009 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 4 OF 11 PHASE V STATUS REPORT Characterization Standards, with the exception of surficial soils (0-6') and soils at the groundwater interface (18-25'). Although some reductions through treatment or attenuation are apparent, the benefits of active treatment relative to O&M costs were not justified, as No Substantial Hazards were apparent. As such, on September 12, 2008 the active Bioventing system was shut down in favor of a passive venting system using a wind driven turbine vent erected above the roofline of the garage building. BEA personnel conducted regular monthly Site inspections at the Hubbard Site since September 2005 prior to the discontinuation of the active system. Each time, the vacuum, pressure and magnahelic flow gauges on the regenerative blower were checked and recorded on Bioventing System O&M Inspection Reports documented in Appendix B. During the final system inspection on September 12, 2008, the operating vacuum was been measured at 10" of water. The particulate filter was checked and a photoionization detector(PID)was used to record the total organic volatile (TOV) concentrations in the influent air from each SVE point, as well as between(intermediate)the two GAC units and at the exhaust vent. Air-Sparging System The air sparging pilot study was also terminated on September 12, 2008. The pilot study began on February 16, 2007, as specified in the ROS Status Report VI (9/7/06). The sparging point (AS-1) was installed approximately ten feet northwest (upgradient) of monitoring well SEA-1 and approximately ten feet southeast of bioventing points SVE B-3S and D. BEA elected to abandon the air sparging system at the Site in favor of a passive venting system and engineering controls after monthly sampling and then quarterly sampling showed no significant further decreases in fractional petroleum hydrocarbons. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING/RISK CHARACTERIZATION [APPENDIX B & D] On November 20, 2008 BEA personnel were on Site to complete semi-annual groundwater sampling of select downgradient monitoring wells in review of potential exposure pathways, as specified in the Environmental Monitoring section of the previous Remedy Operation Status report. Downgradient monitoring wells GZA-1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW- 6S(R)/D on the Robies Refrigeration property were gauged, purged, and sampled for EPH with target-4 poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and VPH with target BTEX analytes. Remedial additive testing was also performed in downgradient monitoring wells as previously noted. Perimeter Monitoring_Wells Results of the November 2008 semi-annual sampling event indicated that all concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH and target analytes in all perimeter monitoring wells were below the reporting limits of the analysis or as significantly below the applicable GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards. In each case, the reported value or reporting limit was significantly less than the applicable GW-1 and GW-3 standards. A summary of groundwater laboratory analysis is presented in Appendix D of this report. MARCH 26,2009 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 5 OF 11 PHASE V STATUS REPORT Interior Monitoring Interior monitoring wells were not sampled over the reporting period. The sampling frequency of the interior monitoring wells had been reduced to every five years, as specified in the previous Remedy Operation Status Report. However, in consideration of post-active remedial system environmental conditions and the need to evaluate any potential Substantial Hazards, interior monitoring wells will be sampled in May 2009 for EPHNPH analysis with target analytes to determine if the site has achieved a Class C-1, RAO. Soil No soil sampling was performed over the reporting period. Results of previous soil sampling events demonstrate positive treatment of soils in the intermediate and deep horizons, wherein the bioventing remedial system served to decrease concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH. Concentrations of EPH and VPH, have not decreased significantly in the shallow soils (0- 6') as most recently reported (May 2008) at concentrations above the applicable S-2/GW-1 and GW-3, Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards, and in some cases, the Method 2 — Direct Contact standards (S-2). Additional shallow soil sampling in the vicinity of TB-I I (Zone A), TB-6 (Zone B) and HB-1 (Zone C), will be conducted in consideration of any potential Substantial Hazards towards achieving a Class C-1,RAO. Microbial Respiration Analysis No respiration analysis was performed over the reporting period. The bioventing system was shut down on September 12, 2008, as such no further respiration analysis is proposed. Previous analysis of soils collected from SVE A-1 and SVE B-3 indicated sufficient indigenous bacteria with a lack of sufficient nutrients. As such, supplemental nutrient additions were made, by introducing a low-strength fertilizer through the soil vapor points, during monthly Site inspections. The final injection of nutrients was performed on September 12, 2008. REMEDIAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SOil/Bio-ventin� The bioventing remedial system treating soil impact at the Site was suspended in September 2008. The system had been operating since September 2005. Over the past three years decreasing concentrations of EPH and VPH were documented during the yearly soil sampling events. The last soil sampling was performed on July 7, 2008 to qualify the reduction of petroleum concentrations in vadose zone soils in the areas of identified impact. As previously noted, soil sampling was conducted via three test borings; two in Zone B (TB-6C and TB-8C) and one in Zone A (TB-11C). Samples were collected in two-foot intervals, every five feet and then composited into three distinct intervals (3-5', 8-15' and 18-25') for analysis. Soil samples were analyzed for EPH and VPH and the results were compared with samples collected from similar locations during Phase H activities conducted in October 2002 and performance sampling MARCH 26,2009 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 6 OF 11 PHASE V STATUS REPORT conducted in May 2006 and May 2007 The July 2008 soil-sampling event reported that significant levels of petroleum impact remain in shallow soils (3-5' bgs) in Zone A because the bioventing remedial system was not designed or constructed to adequately treat shallow soil impact as readily accessible. Concentrations of residual soil impact in the intermediate and deeper depths in Zones A and B responded well to the bioventing system with concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH concentrations below the applicable S-2 and S-3 Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards,with the exception of TB-8C: 18-25' (350 ug/L), which remains marginally above the S-3/GW-1 standard of 300 ug/L, most likely due to groundwater impact at the Site. BEA has previously recommended the mechanical removal of surficial soils and the construction of an infiltration system and engineered barrier at the Site to eliminate the direct contact exposures and absolve the potential leaching of contaminants within the soils to groundwater as a chronic and persistent source of groundwater impact. Most recently, the cost to benefit of such work has been revisited under the context of Feasibility wherein static or attenuating groundwater impact is apparently limited to a discreet area and the facility is surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence topped with barbed wire fence as effectively limiting exposures to Site workers that are typically involved in the transfer and distribution of fuels. Over the next reporting period, BEA will sample surficial soils for EPHNPH analysis in the areas of surficial soil impacts for comparison to the Method 2 Direct Contact Exposure Criteria and in consideration of eliminating or reducing the area of soil removal and construction of an engineered barrier to evaluate any potential Substantial Hazard to achieve a Class C-1, RAO. Groundwater/Reactive Barrier BEA was operating an air sparging pilot study, which was suspended in September 2008. The air sparging system operated for 18-months upgradient of monitoring well SEA-1 to evaluate if groundwater impact may be treated more effectively. The influence of the supplemental sparge treatments was further evaluated by regular groundwater sampling for treatment performance. Results of the air sparging system pilot study did not indicate any significant reductions in fractional EPH and VPH. As such, the air sparging system was suspended in September 2008. The remedial additive ORC-Advanced was replenished as a reactive barrier at the downgradient property line as well as within the source area in May 2008 based on laboratory analytical results of downgradient perimeter monitoring wells indicating the diminishing capacity of the ORC-Advanced to act as an oxygen barrier. Subsequent to the anticipated lifetime of the barrier (12-months), BEA will monitor for petroleum hydrocarbons in downgradient monitoring wells to evaluate whether any Substantial Release Migration has occurred. Remedial Additive Monitoring MARCH 26,2009 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 7 OF 11 PHASE V STATUS REPORT During the November 2008 sampling event,the perimeter monitoring wells were sampled for wet chemistry in accordance with the provisions for remedial additive use, 310 CMR 40.0046. Wet chemistry analysis included nitrate, phosphorus and magnesium. Concentrations of wet chemistry parameters observed over the reporting period have been consistent with baseline/background concentrations indicating no significant degradation of water quality associated with remedial treatments downgradient of the treatment area. Wet chemistry tracking charts are included for reference in Appendix D. RISK CHARACTERIZATION AND REVIEW OF SUBSTANTIAL HAZARD Groundwater Contaminant concentrations in groundwater sampling of central wells SEA-1 and SEA-2, located immediately downgradient of the source areas on the Hubbard property, have been significantly fluctuating since they were first sampled in 2002. Regardless, Mann-Kendall statistical evaluations of laboratory results from 2002 through current data indicate a negative fifteen (45) value at SEA-1 and a negative thirteen (43) value at SEA-2, representing statistically decreasing concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons at these locations [Refer to Tables 5 and 6]. Table 5: Mann-Kendall Worksheet for SEA-1 (TPH) Date 10/02 2/04 11/04 5/05 11/05 5/06 11/06 3/07 4/07 5/07 9/07 11/07 2/07 6/08 Totals Conc.(mg/L) 6.4 26.0 23.0 12.0 39.0 11.9 5.19 4.66 9.41 34.70 3.65 7.36 15.1 14.6 6.4 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +1 +7 26.0 -1 -1 +1 -1 1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -8 23.0 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -7 12.0 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -3 39.0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -9 11.9 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -2 5.19 -1 +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +1 +3 4.66 -1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +1 +2 9.41 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 +2 34.70 -1 -1 -1 -1 -4 3.65 +1 +1 +1 +3 7.36 +1 +1 +2 15.1 -1 -1 14.6 Total -15 MARCH 26,2009 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 8 OF 11 PHASE V STATUS REPORT Table 6: Mann-Kendall Worksheet for SEA-2 (TPH) Date 10/02 2/5/04 11/04 5105 11105 5/06 11/06 5/07 11/07 6/08 Totals Conc.(mg/L) 40.0 6.45 81.0 2.1 2.6 33.4 1.27 3.22 11.2 1.59 40.0 -1 +1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -5 6.45 +1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -2 81.0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -7 2.1 +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 -1 +2 2.6 +1 -1 +1 +1 -1 +1 33.4 1 -1 -1 -1 -4 1.27 +1 +1 +1 +3 3.22 +1 -1 0 11.2 -1 -1 1.59 Total -13 During the reporting period, and throughout testing conducted over the past 7 years, all concentrations of EPH and VPH and associated target analytes in downgradient monitoring wells have been consistently reported as at or below the applicable GW-1 and GW-3, Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. Based on the statistical evaluation of petroleum hydrocarbon reduction in the source areas and the absence of impacts in downgradient monitoring wells, an attenuating plume of reduced size and decreasing groundwater concentrations is indicated. As such, there is presently no Condition of Substantial Release Migration nor any Critical Exposure Pathway is apparent. As such, presently there is no Substantial Hazards associated with residual static or attenuation groundwater impacts under current Site conditions and uses relative to potential ingestion, inhalation or dermal contact exposures to identified human receptors or significant environmental impacts to ecological receptors. Soils Although there may be potential human exposures associated with surficial soil impacts, these areas are publicly restricted, with no children present, by a gated 6' chain-link fence topped with barbed wire, with No Trespassing signs along the perimeter of the property which is patrolled and monitored during business operations and locked at all other times. Employees of Hubbard Oil have been advised of environmental hazards. BEA has also recommended the removal of shallow accessible soils (0-3' bgs) to negate issues related to petroleum impact in these surficial soils. Therefore, there is neither a condition of Imminent Hazard nor any Substantial Hazards associated with the Site under current Site conditions, conditioned upon restricted access by locked fencing, signage, patrolling and monitoring of the area of release area MARCH 26,2009 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 9 OF 11 PHASE V STATUS REPORT on the subject property. FUTURE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Bio-venting System Operation&Maintenance: As previously noted, the active bioventing system has been suspended and replaced with a passive wind-driven turbine vent erected above the roofline of the garage building at the Site. Results of the May 2008 soil analysis indicate concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH as below the applicable Method 1 S-2 and S-3 Risk Characterization Standards with the exception of the shallow surficial soils, which the bioventing system cannot effectively treat, as well as at the TB-8C location at the groundwater interface. BEA has also been injecting a nutrient solution into the subsurface in the form of a low-strength fertilizer poured into the shallow bioventing points. The final addition of the nutrient solution was performed in September 2008 and the nutrients will no longer be applied. As such, no additional remedial additive monitoring will be conducted in downgradient wells for nitrate or phosphate. Additionally, after May 2009 and the expiration of the ORC reactive barrier, no additional remedial monitoring of manganese will be conducted. Environmental Monitoring. Soil Results of the May 2008 soil sampling event report concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH at the TB-11 (Zone A) locations as greater than the Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards and the Method 2, Direct Contact standards (S-2). Additional soils sampling and analysis in all areas (0-6') will be conducted in review of limiting soil removal and the construction of an engineered barrier. Although there may be potential human exposures associated with surficial soil impacts, access to these areas are publicly restricted by locked fencing, signage, patrolling and monitoring of the area of release area on the subject property. Further soil (and groundwater) sampling will be used in consideration of modifying or eliminating the planned removal of the surficial soils and engineered barrier in favor of an Activity and Use Limitation with Site Health and Safety and Soil Management Plans as an alternative to assure No Substantial Hazard under a Class C-1, RAO condition. Environmental Monitoring: Groundwater As reported in the previous Remedy Operation Status Report, Semi-annual (May/November) groundwater monitoring of the downgradient perimeter monitoring wells GZA- 1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW-6S(R)/D will be conducted for EPH with target 4 PAHs and VPH analysis with target BTEX analytes. In addition, central monitoring wells SEA-1, SEA-2, MW-1, MW-2 and MW-4 will be sampled for VPH/EPH analysis with all targets in May 2009. All sampling will be accompanied by field measurements of dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity and temperature. < MARCH 26,2009 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 10 OF 11 PHASE V STATUS REPORT Remedial additive monitoring for Magnesium, will be conducted in May 2009 in review of any potential degradation to groundwater related to the remaining lifetime of the ORC reactive barrier. Based on the projected life-span of the ORC-Advanced estimated to be up to 12-months, no more remedial additive monitoring will be conducted after the May 2009 event. Subsequent to the anticipated lifetime of the reactive barrier, BEA will monitor for any rebound or evidence of any migration in downgradient monitoring wells through the projected time of travel. Soil Removal with Engineered Barrier and Infiltration System Remedial efforts under Comprehensive Response Actions over the past five years have resulted in the significant reduction of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils and groundwater. However, reducing groundwater concentrations below the Method 1 GW-1 groundwater standards to meet a Class A, RAO is apparently infeasible at the present time. Environmental monitoring over the past three years, however, has indicated "lines of evidence" for stable environmental conditions and attenuation of the petroleum hydrocarbon plume. Based on the premise of technical infeasibility, BEA has recommended the removal of surficial contaminated soils for the construction of an engineered barrier to effectively cap the area of soil contamination to protect against potential dermal exposures and leaching to groundwater in support of a Class C, Response Action Outcome. Competitive bids were solicited for the recommended response actions and the results of the analysis with the bids and specifications including cross-sections and groundwater flow plans were previously sent to Hubbard. The implementation of such recommendations remains under review by Hubbard. BEA is prepared to implement the removal of the more heavily impacted, easily accessible (0-3') soils at the Site as well as the construction of the engineered barrier and infiltration system originally proposed in the Remedy Implementation Plan(6/23/03). However, additional soil and groundwater sampling as proposed herein is being conducted in consideration of limiting soil removal and engineered barrier construction whereby an Activity and Use Limitation may be used under the Class C-1, RAO to effectively manage any Substantial Hazards. Assuming the facility will remain a fuel storage and transfer facility, the AUL may be a more cost effective alternative in eliminating potential exposure risks. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Remedial efforts under various response actions conducted over the past five years have resulted in the reduction of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils and groundwater. Environmental monitoring, however, has indicated "lines of evidence" for stable environmental conditions and attenuation of the dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbon plume. Based on limitations caused by technical infeasibility to meet a Permanent Solution given current and foreseeable GW-1 standards, BEA has recommended moving the project into a Class C, Response Action Outcome as a Temporary Solution. MARCH 26,2009 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 11 OF 11 PHASE V STATUS REPORT In September 2008, BEA terminated the air sparging system and the active bioventing system, in favor of a passive venting due to the limited effect of the air sparging point to treat groundwater and the inability of the active bioventing system to treat surficial soils. The effective lifetime of the reactive barrier at the downgradient property line is expected to expire May 2009. Following the depletion of the reactive barrier, subsequent groundwater monitoring will be used to monitor any potential Substantial Release Migration and Substantial Hazards and ability to achieve a Class C-1, RAO. Over the next reporting period BEA will perform EPHNPH sampling of shallow soils to compare with the Method 2 Direct Contact Exposure Criteria, to evaluate the possibility of limiting soil removal and construction of engineered barriers and potential use of an Activity and Use Limitation with requirements for Health and Safety and Soil Management Plans. Subsequent to the additional assessment and monitoring, BEA may recommend the Termination of Remedy Operation Status and filing of a Phase V Completion Report with a Class C-1 RAO to achieve a Temporary Solution for the site. Periodic soil and groundwater sampling will be documented over the next six months and reported in a Phase V Status Report in September i 2009. The LSP opinions represented by this report are established by the certifications made on the Comprehensive Response Action [BWSC-108] Transmittal Form. The LSP opinions are based upon available data and regulations in effect at the time of this reporting. Should you have any questions or require any further information,please contact me directly. Sincerely, B TT IRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC. Y D ennett,LSP rroject hn D. a ema-Wi t Principal Manager Encl. Supporting Appendices [A through E] cc: Hubbard Oil, Inc. -Attn: Evelyn Read, General Manager 1 Robert A. Fasanella, Esq. - RUBIN&RUDMAN,LLP 1 Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department 2 Thomas McKean - Barnstable Board of Health 2 John Klimm-Barnstable Town Manager 2 John Robichaud,Abutter-Robie's Refrigeration 2 'Full report 2 Report Narrative,Transmittal Forms and Site Plan PHASE V STATUS REPORT TO MAINTAIN REMEDY OPERATION STATUS WITH REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN 4-0824/4-15370 Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc. 33 &51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328,Parcel 125 & 126] Hyannis,MA. 02601 Project#BEA02-3490 MARCH 26,2009 Prepared By: BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC. 1573 Main Street P.O.Box 1743 Brewster,MA 02631 David C.Bennett,LSP. Prepared For: Mr. Gerard Martin,Chief Sites Management&Permitting Section,BWSC Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office(SERO) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup(BWSC)/Sites Management Program(SMP) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville,MA 02347 On Behalf Of: Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc. P.O.Box 10-Hyannis,MA 02601 Evelyn Read, General Manager APPENDIX A: Reference Plans -Figure 1: Site Locus Plan from USGS Topographic Quad.,Hyannis-Excerpt(TOPO 1998) -Figure 2:MA DEP BWSC GIS Map,Hyannis-Excerpt(MA DEP 9/29/00) -Figure 3:Water Table Contour Map Excerpt,Town of Barnstable, 1992 - Site Plan ROS-1 - `Comprehensive Response Actions...", Prepared by BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC.,Dated March 16,2006(rev.03/18/09) APPENDIX B: Field Reports -Field Inspection Reports:#72(9/12/08)and#73 (11/20/08) -Monitor Well Sampling Log: 11/20/08 -Bioventing System Operation/Monitoring Inspection Form:#36(9/12/08) -TOV Tracking Charts-Zone A,Zone B,All points, SVE B3 S,D APPENDIX C: Environmental Records -BWSC-108:Comprehensive Response Actions Transmittal Form -BWSC-108A:Remedial Monitoring Report Transmittal Forms(3) -BWSC-108B:Remedial Monitoring Report Transmittal Forms(1) APPENDIX D: Laboratory Analysis -Table 1:EPH analysis summary-Perimeter Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 2:VPH analysis summary-Perimeter Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 3:EPH analysis summary-Central Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 4:VPH analysis summary-Central Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 5:EPH analysis summary-Soil -Table 6:VPH analysis summary-Soil -Wet chemistry Tracking Charts-Perimeter wells[GZA-2,MW-5S,MW-6S(R)] -Groundwater Analytical Laboratory Reports: [Groundwater—12/9/08] APPENDIX E: Quality Assurance/Quality Control . BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS,ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS,GEOLOGISTS,SANITARIANS 1573 Main Street,P.O.Box 1743 (508)896-1706 Brewster,MA 02631 fax(508)896-5109 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: DATE: JOB NUMBER: Mr.Gerard Martin, Section Chief 03/26/008 B002-3490 BWSC/SMP MA DEP-SERO 20 Riverside Drive. REGARDING: Lakeville,MA 02347 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX& REMEDIAL MONITORING STATUS REPORT Hubbard"Oil"Company,Inc.-RTN 4-0824(Linked to RTN#4-15370) SHIPPING METHOD: `33 a'nd-5l=Br6oks Road�[Assessors Map 328,Parcel 125 and 126] "Hyannis-,`MA 0266F'" Regular Mail ❑ Federal Express ❑ Certified Mail ❑ UPS ❑ Priority Mail ❑ Pick Up ❑ Express Mail ❑X Hand Deliver ❑ COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 03/21/2008 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX& REMEDIAL MONITORING STATUS REPORT For review and comment: ❑ For approval: ❑ As requested: ❑ �;f;, For your use: REMARKS: ;( r-j1 r i c.c. Hubbard Oil,Inc.-Attn:Evelyn Read,General Manager(Bound Copy) ' -� Robert A.Fasanella,Esq.-RUBIN&RUDMAN,LLP(Bound Copy and CD) Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department(Narrative,title page,site plan only) Thomas McKean-Barnstable Board of Health(Narrative,title page,site plan only) John Klimm-Barnstable Town Manager(Narrative,title page,site plan only) John Robichaud,Abutter-Robie's Refrigeration(Narrative,title page,site plan only) FROM: John Tadema-Wielandt/gjb If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once t . 1 ' BE' NNETTENVIRONMENTAL 'AssO' C' 'IA' TES, INCO' LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS A ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS A GEOLOGISTS A SANITARIANS 1573 Main Street- P.O. Box 1743, Brewster, MA 02631 A 508-896-1706 A Fax 508-896-5109 A www.benneft-ea.com B002-3490 March 21, 2008 Mr. Gerard Martin, Section Chief Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC)/Sites Management Program(SMP) MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office (SERO) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 RE: REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX& REMEDIAL MONITORING STATUS.REPORT Hubbard Oil Company, Inc. -RTN 4-0824 (Linked to RTN#4-15370) 33 and 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328, Parcel 125 and 126] Hyannis, MA 02601 Dear Mr. Martin, On behalf of our client, Hubbard Oil, Inc., BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. (herein referred to as BEA) has prepared this Remedy Operation Status Report for the above referenced Site, as consistent with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0893. This filing-documents-the-remedial_response actions and_environmental-monitoring--activities conducted`at the.Site.over_the.past six.(6).n hs associated with the operation and maintenance of an active bioventing remedial system. Environmental monitoring over the period includes microbial respiration analysis, groundwater sampling and laboratory testing in review of any potential exposures to identified human and environmental receptors Cand-as-a=measure-of (remedial performance relative to:project_closure objectives: In this period, microbial respiration rates indicate stable biological activity and effective hydrocarbon mineralization in impacted soils as consistent with earlier soil testing. Laboratory analysis of d� gradient-monitoring-wells=have-indicated-fractional'Extractable_Petroleum C Hydrocarbon-(EPH)-and-target-analyte-concentrations-as-below-reporting-limits-(BRL£)vor� significantly-below the-applic`able�and.most.restrictive.GW-1;.MRIhod' 1 - Risk Characterization standards. Although,trace-concentrations-,of.'a:single_target:analyte were=detected-in-a-sentinel ,monitoring'well, all Critical Exposure Pathways (CEP's) to identified human and environmental receptors remain incomplete and conditions of No Substantial Hazard and No Imminent Hazard (IH) exist under current Site conditions. LRemedial.efforts:under Comprehensive_Response-Actions-over tlfe:past:four-years-have ,resulted:in:the,reduction..of-petroleumhydrocarbons-in-soils-and--groundwater in-a-limited- capacity: Environmental monitoring, however, has characterized "lines of evidence" for stable environmental conditions and attenuation of the dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbon plume. 1 EMERGENCY SPILL RESPONSE A WASTE SITE CLEANUP A SITE ASSESSMENT A ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING A LAND USE PLANNING WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT,OPERATION&MAINTENANCE A WASTEWATER TREATMENT,OPERATION&MAINTENANCE MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 2 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX However, based on issues of technical and financial infeasibility to meet a permanent solution, BEA has recommended the removal of surficial contaminated soils for the construction of an engineered barrier to effectively cap the area of soil contamination against potential dermal exposures and leaching to groundwater in support of a Class C, Response Action Outcome as a Temporary Solution. These recommendations are under review as subject to PRP negotiations with the Insurer This Remedy Operation Status (BOPS IX) document is an addendum to, and an essential part of, the public record for Site characterization, risk assessment of exposure pathways and corrective remedial efforts under Comprehensive Response Actions as a Tier 1 C Site. For the purposes of this report, the previous information offered is omitted as redundant and summarized only to orient the reader. For specific information on historic environmental assessment activities and remedial response actions, the reader should reference the "Phase I Limited Site Investigation" [LCR (2/20/90)], "Phase I - Initial Site Investigation with Tier Classification" [RAM (8/9/96)], "Immediate Response Action Completion Report" [SEA (8/11/00)], and the Phase II Scope of Work (9/20/02), Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Completion Statement (11/18/02), and Phase III Identification, Evaluation and Selection of Comprehensive Response Actions (2/18/03), Phase IV Implementation of Selected Remedial Action Alternatives (6/23/03), Remedy Operation Status Report I (12/30/03), through Remedy Operation Status Report III (3/8/05), Phase IV Completion Statement, Remedy Operation Status Report IV (9/27/05), Remedy Operation Status V (3/16/06) Remedy Operation Status VI (9/7/06), Remedy Operation Status Report VII (3/7/07) and the most recent Remedy Operation Status Report VIII (9/17/07) documents prepared by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. as filed with the MA DEP (SERO). As of January 28, 2008, BEA is the named successor to BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. The work represented within this document, has proceeded under my supervision in a manner consistent with 309 CMR 4.02 (2), the MCP Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS), pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0191 and Quality Assurance/Quality Control policies of BEA. The facts and statements herein are, to the best of our knowledge, a true and accurate representation of the current Site activities, remedial response actions and environmental conditions associated with the project. As such, this document serves as the technical justification and rationale for the LSP Opinions represented by the certifications on the Comprehensive Response Action transmittal forms attached relative to current regulations and standard of care practices at the time of filing. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL The subject property has historically been the location of bulk fuel storage and distribution. Through time (1940-1985), various releases of petroleum hydrocarbons have occurred from the handling and transfer of fuels and from leakage of tanks and lines as undocumented. The Phase II Investigation conducted in 2002 was used to identify three distinct MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 3 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX areas of soil contamination from specific sources. Zone A is an area in the north central portion of the property that corresponds to the location of former aboveground fuel tanks for the storage of fuel oil. It is reported that the containment facilities around the tanks were concrete walls with an earthen bottom. These tanks lead to a fueling rack to the south of the containment facility. In the 60' x 55' area defined, gross weathered soil impact extends from the surface through the entire soil column to the groundwater at 28 ` below grade. A second area, Zone B, in the east central portion of the property corresponds to the area of former above ground and underground tanks historically used for both fuel oil and gasoline. There is a reference to a leaking above ground gasoline tank in this area. Soil testing indicates that although gasoline impact is predominant in. this area, fuel oil impacts are comingled with the gasoline as attributed to handling and transfer of fuel to a loading rack that existed to the west. Zone B is defined as a 65' x 45' area of soil impact extending from the surface throughout the soil column to groundwater at 28' below grade. A third area of minor soil impact is located adjacent to the abandoned 100,000 gallon above ground tank. This impact is surficial as attributed to minor leakage of fuel oil from valving and lines at the base of the tank. Zone C is a 10' x 15' area of soil impact to a depth of 5'. Based on mass balance computations, it appears that over 50 years of operation as a bulk fuel plant, some 5,000+ gallons of fuel oil and gasoline may have been released as entering the groundwater and traveling east in a downgradient direction towards the Barnstable Water Company well field property line as within 1000' of the release area. Groundwater testing of multi-level downgradient monitoring wells shows that the extent of dissolved phase groundwater impact extends 200-300' downgradient of the release areas across the railroad easement and onto the abutting property. Groundwater impact is limited to the upper portion of the unconfined sand aquifer. The extent of groundwater impact is defined by the wells on the abutting property intermediate to the well field. These wells monitor a Critical Exposure Pathway as critical samples. Under Phase III, a remedial strategy was piloted and subsequently developed to stabilize the groundwater plume, reduce contaminant source and isolate impacted soils from direct contact and further leaching of contaminants to groundwater. The Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan (RIP) proposed the construction of a reactive barrier, removal and capping of surficial soils and bioventing with use of remedial additives was set forth. In 2005, the reactive barrier and bioventing system were installed and active remediation commenced. The soil removals and the, infiltration/capping system portion of the RIP were never implemented, as complicated by Eminent Domain proceedings against the property and negotiations of coverage and reimbursement by the PRP's Insurer. Most recently a sparge component has been piloted as part of the Remedy Operation Status (ROS) and the construction of an engineered barrier over the area of shallow soil removal have been proposed as a modification of the Phase IV. Regardless, throughout the period of 2005 to the present day, the remediation strategy implemented has been successful in absolving any issue of further plume migration and successfully reduced contaminant source contributing to documented attenuation of the groundwater plume. Cost to feasibility analysis and past performance evaluations indicate that it MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 4 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS D{ is technically and financially infeasible to meet the GW-1 standards to support a Class A Response Action Outcome (RAO) as a permanent solution. Therefore, the full implementation of the remedial strategy with shallow soil removal, engineered barrier with ongoing active biosparging is viewed as an effective alternative to assure No Substantial Hazard conditions are maintained under a Class C, RAO temporary solution. Ongoing sampling of downgradient monitoring wells for EPH/VPH with target analytes is conducted in review of CEP's. Additional monitoring wells immediately downgradient of Zone A and Zone B are tested for EPH and VPH without target analytes in review of treatment performance. In addition, TOV monitoring of the bioventing system and respiration analysis (carbon dioxide/oxygen/methane) is used as indicators of source removal as is periodically qualified by borings and soil sampling for EPH and/or VPH analysis. PHASE V OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING As consistent with the Operation, Maintenance and Environmental Monitoring Plan set forth in the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan Modification, BEA performed periodic Site inspections over the reporting period to monitor operations and perform maintenance on the active bio-venting and air-sparging treatment systems in use at the subject Site. These inspections were further utilized to assess environmental conditions and conduct prescribed groundwater sampling in consideration of remedial system performance. A total of eight(8) Site inspections were conducted at the over the past six months on 9/19/07, 10/23/07, 11/14-15/07, 12/20/07, 1/16/08, 2/15/08 and 3/3/08. These inspections, and specific daily activities, are documented on field reports in Appendix B and the RMR transmittal forms. The following is a summary of significant events over the past six months. SITE INSPECTIONS Reactive Barrier On April 13 and 14, 2005, 1,000 lbs. of"ORC-Advanced" compound was injected into the subsurface at the downgradient property line (10 injection locations) adjacent to Zone A and Zone B, as well as within source areas delineated as Zone A and Zone B. Injection points were spaced approximately 15' apart at the downgradient property line and approximately 10' apart within source areas. During the sampling event on November 14 and 15, 2007, downgradient monitoring wells MW-5S, MW-6S(R) and GZA-2 on the Robies Refrigeration property were sampled for remedial additive use pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0046 and as specified in the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan. No adverse impacts associated with remedial additive use have been observed, wherein no excessive concentrations by magnesium, the primary component of ORC, have been reported. Wherein the longevity of ORC-Advanced is estimated at 12 to 24 months, BEA has evaluated the effectiveness of the additive by monitoring concentrations of dissolved oxygen (DO) and magnesium in these downgradient monitoring wells. As previously MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 5 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX reported, based on decreasing concentrations of magnesium observed during the most recent sampling event as well as decreasing concentrations of DO and the presence of trace concentrations of dissolved-phase groundwater impact, it appears that the ORC barrier has been depleted. As such, BEA had previously recommended that a second application of the ORC- Advanced be conducted at the Site to replenish the oxygen barrier in order to reduce the potential off-Site migration of impacted groundwater in the short-term. In the longer term, the removal of impacted near-surface soils and the construction of an engineered barrier are has been recommended, to prevent any potential dermal contacts to Site workers and leaching of contaminants to groundwater. The implementation of such recommendations remains under review by the PRP as subject to ongoing negotiations with the Insurer. Syste s BEA personnel have conducted regular monthly Site inspections at the Hubbard Site since September 2005. Each time, the vacuum, pressure and magnahelic flow gauges on the regenerative blower were checked and recorded on Bioventing System O&M Inspection Reports documented in Appendix B. Throughout the period, the operating vacuum has been measured consistently at 10" of water. The moisture trap did not require emptying over the reporting period. The particulate filter was checked and a photoionization detector (PID) was used to record the total organic volatile (TOV) concentrations in the influent air from each SVE point, as well as between(intermediate)the two GAC units and at the exhaust vent. Air-Sparging Pilot Study On February 16, 2007, BEA personnel began an air-sparging Pilot Study as specified in the ROS Status Report VI (9/7/06). The sparging point (AS-1) was installed approximately ten feet northwest (upgradient) of monitoring well SEA-1 and approximately ten feet southeast of bioventing points SVE B-3S and D. During the installation, thirty-five feet of 11/4" galvanized pipe with a 1' stainless steel screen was installed ten feet below the water table to 35' below grade surface (bgs). To install the point, a test boring was performed to the groundwater interface the sparging point was then driven into the vadose zone to avoid creating a preferential pathway for injected air. A two-foot bentonite seal was applied at the groundwater interface and the borehole was backfilled with native material to grade. BEA personnel sampled monitoring well SEA-1, immediately downgradient of sparge point AS-1, on a monthly basis in March, April and May 2007 and quarterly in September and November 2007 and February 2008 to determine the effect of air-sparging on concentrations of dissolved-phase hydrocarbons at that location. Results of the March 2007 sampling event reported concentrations of Cl 1 to C22 fractional aromatics decreased slightly after the first month of air sparging. Results of the April 2007 sampling event reported an increase in fractional CI I to C22 aromatics in SEA-1, and results of the May 2007 sampling event showed a significant increase in EPH concentrations in SEA-1 as noted graphically below. However, MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 6 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX concentrations of C11 to C22 aromatics reported a significant decrease in September 2007 and increased slightly in November before creeping up again in February 2008. EPH C11 To C22 Fractional Aromatics in SEA-1 Over Time 25,000 A23,400 20,000 J 15,000 0 13,eoo 0 a .. d 10,000 V 7,300 Y7.200 BegIn AS Pllot Study 6.4 0 5,000 2H 6/G7 3,640 OR�1� ao0 Ill 3,300 '��`500 /22,100 0 Oct-02 Feb-04 Nov-04 May-05 Nov-05 May-06 Nov-06 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Feb-08 Date Additional VPH analysis was also performed over the reporting period to determine the full effect of sparging at the Site in reducing concentrations of dissolved-phase groundwater impacts within the source area monitoring wells. Concentrations of VPH C9 to C10 fractional Aromatics were reported at concentrations between 1,400 mg/L (9/07) and 1,800 mg/L (2/08) as observed below. MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 7 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS DX VPH Fractional C9-C10 Aromatics in SEA-1 Over Time 7,000 ssoo 6,000 5,000 J rn �� 4,600 7 C 4,000 .�0 to y 3,000 ` Pilot Skidy 0 2/1 WO7 L) 2,000 J 1,800 1,000 0 Feb-04 May-06 Nov-06 Sep-07 Nov-07 Feb-08 Date These results indicate that while concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons have been generally lower than previously observed, air sparging in the short-term has not served to significantly reduce heavier aromatic compounds impacts to groundwater as attributed to volatilization. Regardless, TOV concentrations in the bioventing system have decreased significantly through time and increased carbon dioxide and oxygen depletion as a measure of biological activity remains significantly above background concentrations as evidence of microbial mineralization of petroleum hydrocarbons. Additional field-testing will be performed at the end of March to determine if modifications to the sparging system may have possible benefits toward reducing concentrations of petroleum in groundwater at the Site. The results of the additional field-testing will be included in subsequent filings and qualified by periodic soil and groundwater analysis. REPRESENTATIVENESS EVALUATION AND DATA USABILITY ASSESSMENT The following presents a discussion of the site information used in the evaluation of CEP's and treatment performance as consistent with the guidance provided in MA DEP Policy WSC-07-350. It provides an evaluation and demonstration of the adequacy of the spatial and temporal data sets used and makes conclusions on the accuracy, precision and sensitivity of the data used. MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 8 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX Field Screening Over the reporting period, PID screening for TOV concentrations has been used as an indicator of bioventing system performance as well as a measure of off-gas controls. The PID detector is regularly calibrated by isobutylene to benzene standards. Decreasing TOV concentrations in the SVE/Sparge manifold are attributed to a reduction in petroleum hydrocarbons in affected media. Increasing TOV concentrations in the off-gas intermediate location indicates activated carbon breakthrough as dictating carbon change out. In addition, gas-monitoring equipment is used for the field-testing of microbial respiration rates. A fan is used to pull three air volumes from the vertical SVE risers after they have been shut down for 24 hours. The measurement of carbon dioxide, methane, oxygen and hydrogen sulfide is recorded as relative percentages. Oxygen depletion (< 20%) and significant carbon dioxide accumulation(>3%) are viewed as a measure of microbial mineralization. This field screening is periodically quantified by physical testing of impacted soils and groundwater. Field screening is also used for selective of representative samples as typically positive TOV biased. Sampling Locations Initial soil sampling was conducted as focused on areas of potentially egregious historic activities and noted soil staining and prior pre-MCP investigations. Subsequent soil sampling was conducted progressively as 10' offsets to previous locations wherein soil conditions of high permeability typically demonstrate minimal horizontal dispersion of contaminants through the soil column. This work was used to define the vertical and horizontal extent of soil impacts and characterize the source of such impact in directing the selection of target analytes. TPH, VPH/ EPH with target analytes and 8260 VOC sampling has been conducted during the course of the CRA activities. This information has been used to develop sampling protocols for representative methods and for the exclusive of target analytes as substantiated by a preponderance of evidence. No soil sampling has been conducted in this reporting period. Groundwater samples from downgradient perimeter wells are collected as critical samples in the evaluation of CEP's associated with potential ingestion of contaminated drinking water. There are multi-level wells to test the shallow and intermediate portions of the aquifer. The well locations have been confirmed to be representative as based on groundwater flow direction. The deeper wells are set at depth that is intermediate to the screened interval of the PWS wells. Solute transport modeling from slug testing and hydraulic gradient measurements indicates that the samples are certainly within the projected time of travel. Groundwater samples for perimeter downgradient wells were tested in November 2007 during the reporting period. These wells were analyzed by VPH/EPH methods with target analytes reported. Only the fuel oil/diesel oil related PAH compounds are reported as based on prior characterization wherein these compounds were the exclusively reported above detection limits in the area of release and other MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 9 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS a PAH compounds are attributed to coal tar derivatives from the abutting railway easement as exempt from notification under the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0317(9) and representing background conditions. Additionally, only select metals were used for remedial additive monitoring as specific to ORC. Other than these issues identified in Section F of the Compendium of Analytical Method (CAM), all other responses were in the affirmative and Presumptive Certainty of the data was met. Additional groundwater sampling in the reporting period was conducted in September 2007 and February 2008 at the interior SEA-1 monitoring well. Again, all the responses were affirmative on the CAM Certification with the exception of Section F. EPH/VPH methods were used but no target analytes reported. These methods were chosen as a cost savings measure wherein only performance is evaluated based on relative changes in the fractional compounds. As such, Presumptive Certainty of the data is met for the intended purpose of performance evaluation. Field duplicates or trip blanks were not collected or considered necessary for the reporting period as based on a preponderance of historic evidence. Over the past five years of monitoring, perimeter wells typically report all fractional compounds and target analytes as BRL or at low concentrations wherein the reported concentration or reporting limits are significantly less that the most restrictive GW-1 and GW-3, Method 1 — Risk Characterization standards. EPHNPH samples were collected by low flow method and placed in appropriately preserved containers and kept within a cooler with ice and subsequently within a refrigerator pending shipment to the laboratory under a chain-of-custody. Data Inconsistency No inconsistent data was identified for the reporting period. Visual observations, odors and field screening were generally well correlated. The results of the groundwater sampling are consistent with field and historic data. Data Not Used All the data was used for the expressed purposes of CEP evaluation of potential risks or for performance evaluation. Data Usability Groundwater samples collected from the Site in the reporting period were done so in a manner consistent with Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS) of the MCP wherein field screening and past analytical data reporting was used as a guide to sampling protocol and analytical methods employed. All samples were submitted to a MA Certified laboratory, and all groundwater samples were collected upon meeting purge requirements and/or the stabilization of field measurements (temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen and pH). All received MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 10 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX laboratory analytical results were reviewed and validated by BEA upon receipt with verification that Presumptive Certainty requirements were met, and/or that the reported values were technically justified as described in CAM VII A, Section 2.0 (a), (b), (c), and (d). As such, samples and data collected were reviewed in consideration of exposure risks and have been deemed valid and scientifically justified by Site-specific hydrogeologic conditions, aquifer characterization and solute transport modeling represented in the Conceptual Site Model presented herein, iri accordance with the Representative Evaluation and Data Usability (REDUA) guidance requirements under the MA DEP Policy WSC-07-350. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING/RISK CHARACTERIZATION [APPENDIX B & D] On November 14 and 15, 2007 BEA personnel were on Site to complete bi-annual groundwater sampling of select downgradient and source area monitoring wells in review of potential exposure pathways, as specified in the Environmental Monitoring section of the previous Remedy Operation Status report. Downgradient monitoring wells GZA-1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW-6S(R)/D on the Robies Refrigeration property were gauged, purged, and sampled for EPH with target 4 poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and VPH with target BTEX analytes. The downgradient monitoring wells were not analyzed for PAHs via EPA Method 8270 because in the past, elevated concentrations of heavy PAHs were detected in these downgradient monitoring wells due to the fugitive emissions of creosoted timbers in the upgradient Old Colony Railroad bed as exempt from notification and as representing background conditions. Source area monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 were also gauged, purged and sampled for VPH/EPH carbon range only (CRO) as a measure of remedial performance. Remedial additive testing was also performed in downgradient monitoring wells as previously noted. Perimeter Monitoring Results of the November 2007 bi-annual sampling event reported trace concentrations of Ethylbenzene (5 ug/L) in downgradient monitoring well GZA-2. All other VPH fractions and target analytes in all other perimeter monitoring wells were reported as below the reporting limits of the analysis. In each case, the reported value or reporting limit was significantly less than the applicable GW-1 and GW-3, Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards. No concentrations of fractional EPH or target PAHs were reported above the method detection limits in any of the downgradient monitoring wells. In each case, the reporting limit was a concentration less than the applicable GW-1/GW-3, Method 1-Risk Characterization standards. Interior Monitoring Results of the November 2007 sampling event reported increasing concentrations of fractional EPH in central-area monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2. Both monitoring wells SEA- r MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 11 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX 1 (2,100 ug/L) and SEA-2 (2,500 ug/L) reported concentrations of fractional C11 to C22 aromatics exceeding the GW-1 standards. These concentrations are also marginally higher than those reported in the November 2006 sampling event. A summary of groundwater laboratory analysis is presented in Table 3 and Table 4 located in Appendix D of this report. Soil No additional soil sampling has been conducted over the reporting period for the qualification of contaminant reduction in unsaturated soils within the vadose zone in the areas of identified impact. Such testing will be conducted in May 2008. Previous soil sampling results indicate positive treatment of soils in the intermediate and deep horizons, wherein the bioventing remedial system has served to decrease concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH. However, laboratory analytical results also indicate impacts to potentially accessible soils at 3-5' bgs are increasing at the TB-11B and TB-8B locations, wherein the reported concentrations are exceeding the applicable S-2/GW-1 Method 1 — Risk Characterization Standards, as well as the S-2, Method 2 Direct Contact Standard for fractional EPH (C9 to C 18) at TB-11 B. These results indicate that the bioventing system is not adequately treating shallow soils. BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. has again reiterated our recommendation to include the excavation and re-cycling of surficial contaminated soils 0-3' [600 yards +/-] and the construction of an infiltration trench, capped with an engineered barrier, within the areas of excavation as part of the remedial strategy to meet closure objectives. Pending review, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. is prepared to proceed with soil removal, infiltration system and engineered barrier construction as a further modification of the RIP and to continue bioventing efforts under the Phase V Remedy Operation Status. Microbial Respiration Anal Respiration analysis was performed on November 15, 2007 and February 15, 2008, in order to compare baseline and post-venting conditions of bacterial respiration to current respiration rates, as well as to track such rates and reported TOV concentrations as a measure of relative treatment performance. Previous analysis of soils collected from SVE A-1 and SVE B-3 indicated sufficient indigenous bacteria with a lack of sufficient nutrients. As such, supplemental nutrient additions were made, by introducing a low-strength fertilizer through the soil vapor points, during monthly Site inspections conducted throughout the reporting period. Baseline respiration analysis indicated superior biological activity with minimal methane observed in some of the more heavily impacted vapor points, as an indicator of anaerobic respiration and an oxygen-limited environment. Significant carbon dioxide accumulation was also observed. Respiration analysis conducted on November 15, 2007 indicated good biological activity with sustained respiration rates at all SVE points. Compared to baseline and previously MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 12 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX measured conditions, average methane concentrations increased to 0.025%, compared to the 0.46% recorded during baseline analysis and 0.0% recorded during respiration analysis in May 2007. An average oxygen concentration of 15.175% was established as increased significantly above the baseline (7.86%) and consistent with previously observed concentrations (15.6625%) in May 2007. Average carbon dioxide concentrations decreased to 4.975% from the 9.3% established through baseline analysis and increased from the 3.43% established in May 2007. Respiration analysis conducted on February 15, 2008 also indicated good biological activity but with decreasing respiration rates in the majority of SVE points. Compared to baseline and previously measured conditions, average methane concentrations increased slightly to 0.025%, compared to the 0.46%recorded during baseline analysis and 0.025%recorded during respiration analysis in November 2007. An average oxygen concentration of 17.25% was established as comparable to baseline (7.86%) and previously observed concentrations (15.5625%) in November 2007. Average carbon dioxide concentrations decreased to 2.5625% from the 3.98% established in November 2007, and were noted to be significantly below the concentration established through baseline analysis (9.3%). Results of the most recent respiration analysis continue to show oxygen depletion relative to an atmospheric concentration of 20% with carbon dioxide accumulations as lines of evidence indicating microbial mineralization of petroleum hydrocarbons. Performance of bioventing is qualified by reductions in measured TOV concentration at the exhaust manifold and by physical testing wherein petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations have decreased in soil and groundwater samples through time. Results of the respiration analyses are included for reference in Appendix B. Respiration analysis tracking charts are also provided for reference in Appendix B. Microbial populations will be quantified during the next round of soil sampling scheduled for May 2008. REMEDIAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SOil/B10-ventinsz No soil sampling was performed over the reporting period. The next soil-sampling event is scheduled for May 2008. Previous soil sampling results have indicated significant reductions in petroleum hydrocarbons indicating effective treatment in subsurface soils. However, as previously noted, soil sampling conducted in shallow soils (3-5' bgs) in Zones A and B indicated that high levels of residual soil impact are present in the shallow potentially accessible soils and that the current bioventing remedial system is not adequately treating this shallow impact. In fact, results of the most recent sampling event (May 2007) report concentrations of EPH and VPH increased significantly in borings TB-I I and TB-8B, with little to no change in TB-6B. BEA has subsequently reasserted our recommendation to implement the full-scale Remedy Implementation Plan consisting of the removal of surficial soils and the construction of an infiltration system and engineered barrier at the Site to eliminate the direct contact exposures and absolve the potential leaching of contaminants within the soils to groundwater as a chronic and MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS R0ADBEA08-3490 PAGE 13 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS DX persistent source of groundwater impact. As such, in future report filings we shall focus our review of performance sampling on the intermediate (8 or 10 to 15' bgs) and deep (18 to 25') samples collected. It should also be noted that simply by operating the bioventing system, petroleum hydrocarbons are being removed from impacted soils via volatilization and vapor extraction. Calculations of the amount of hydrocarbons removed from the soil were made based on the average concentration of TOV readings (46 ppm) being removed by the regenerative blower operating four (4) hours a day (2x/day for 2 hours) since September 23, 2005 (907 days) with an average flow of 110SCFM. This information indicates that over 57 gallons of petroleum hydrocarbons have been removed over the course of the system operation as an additional benefit of the bioventing strategy. The actual reduction in hydrocarbon mass is expected to be much greater due to mineralization of contaminants by indigenous microbes in the soil, as qualified by the most recent soil testing in May 2007. Groundwater/Reactive Barrier The remedial additive ORC-Advanced was applied as a reactive barrier at the downgradient property line as well as within the source area in April 2005. Based on laboratory analytical results of downgradient perimeter monitoring wells over the past few sampling events, it appears that the capacity of the ORC-Advanced to act as an oxygen barrier is diminishing as evidenced by increasing frequency of concentrations of fractional petroleum hydrocarbons and target analytes in groundwater and decreasing concentrations of dissolved oxygen (DO) and magnesium. This coincides with the approximate life of the ORC-Advanced, estimated at up to 24-months. As such, it is the recommendation of BEA that the reactive barrier be replenished, as it has proven effective in mitigating any issues of Substantial Release Migration. Based on recent analytical results, the ORC-Advanced does not appear to have significantly reduced petroleum concentrations in the source area monitoring wells. As such, BEA proposed, constructed and currently operates the sparging system upgradient of monitoring well SEA-1 as a pilot study to evaluate if groundwater impact may be treated more effectively. The influence of the supplemental sparge treatments was further evaluated over the reporting period by quarterly sampling of monitoring well SEA-1 for fractional EPH and VPH. In September 2007 concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH decreased in SEA-1 from previously reported concentrations in May 2007. However during the subsequent two sampling events in November and February, concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH increased. These fluctuations in fractional EPH concentrations have been observed at the Site for the past several years and it is believed that the concentrations of dissolved-phase hydrocarbon impact rise concurrent with fluctuations in groundwater. Additional field-testing is scheduled for the end of March 2008 to determine if any changes in the sparging system would be beneficial to the Site. MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 14 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS D{ Remedial Additive Monitorins? During the May 2007 sampling event, the perimeter monitoring wells were sampled for wet chemistry in accordance with the provisions for remedial additive use, 310 CMR 40.0046. Wet chemistry analysis included nitrate, total nitrogen, sulfate, total iron,manganese, magnesium and total phosphorus. Concentrations of wet chemistry parameters observed over the reporting period have been consistent with baseline/background concentrations as indicating no significant degradation of water quality associated with remedial treatments downgradient of the treatment area. Wet chemistry tracking charts are included for reference in Appendix D. RISK CHARACTERIZATION AND REVIEW OF SUBSTANTIAL HAZARD Groundwater Contaminant concentrations in groundwater sampling of central wells SEA-1 and SEA-2, located immediately downgradient of the source areas on the Hubbard property, continue to fluctuate. Regardless, Mann-Kendall statistical evaluations of laboratory results from 2002 through current data indicate a negative eighteen (48) value at SEA-1 and a negative six (-6) value at SEA-2, representing statistically decreasing concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons at these locations [Refer to Tables 5 and 6]. Table 5: Mann-Kendall Worksheet for SEA-1 (TPH) Date 10/02 2/04 11/04 5/05 11105 5/06 11/06 3/07 4/07 5/07 9/07 11/07 2/07 Totals Conc. 6.4 26.0 23.0 12.0 39.0 11.9 5.19 4.66 9.41 34.70 3.65 7.36 15.1 (mg/L) 6.4 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +6 26.0 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -7 23.0 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -6 12.0 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 1 +1 -4 39.0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -8 11.9 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 +1 -3 5.19 -1 +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +2 4.66 -1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +1 9.41 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 34.70 -1 -1 -1 -3 3.65 +1 +1 +2 7.36 +1 +1 15.1 Total -18 MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 15 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX Table 6: Mann-Kendall Worksheet for SEA-2 (TPH) Date 10/02 2/5/04 11/04 5/05 11/05 5/06 11/06 5/07 11/07 Totals Conc.(mg/L) 40.0 6.45 81.0 2.1 2.6 33.4 1.27 3.22 11.2 40.0 -1 +1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -4 6.45 +1 -1 -1 +1 4 -1 +1 -1 81.0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -6 2.1 +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +3 2.6 +1 -1 +1 +1 +2 33.4 -1 -1 -1 -3 1.27 +1 +1 +2 3.22 +1 +1 Total -6 During the reporting period, and throughout testing conducted over the past 72 months, all concentrations of EPH and VPH and associated target analytes in downgradient monitoring wells have been consistently reported as at or below the applicable GW-1 and GW-3, Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. As such,there is no Condition of Substantial Release Migration nor any completed Critical Exposure Pathway relative to potential ingestion, inhalation or dermal contact exposures to identified human receptors or significant environmental impacts to ecological receptors as associated with groundwater impacts related to the Site. Soils In addition, although there may be potential human exposures associated with surficial soil impacts, these areas are publicly restricted, with no children present, by a gated 6' chain-link fence with No Trespassing signs along the perimeter of the property which is patrolled and monitored during business operations and locked at all other times. Employees of Hubbard Oil have been advised of environmental hazards. BEA has also recommended the removal of shallow accessible soils (0-3' bgs) to negate issues related to petroleum impact in these surficial soils. Therefore, there is neither a condition of Imminent Hazard nor any Substantial Hazards associated with the Site under current Site conditions, as dependent upon restricted access by locked fencing, signage, patrolling and monitoring of the area of release area on the subject property. MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 16 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX FUTURE OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Bio-venting System Operation&Maintenance: . Inspections of the bio-venting system will continue on a monthly basis. At the time of inspection, the vacuum, pressure, and flow gauges will be checked. The moisture trap will be emptied and remedial wastewater removed and stored in a sealed DOT drum in the secured storage building. The particulate filter will also be checked and cleaned or replaced as necessary. A photoionization detector will be used to record the TOV concentrations in the influent air and intermediate to the GAC units for evidence of breakthrough. The primary GAC unit will be replaced when intermediate breakthrough is indicated. In addition, nutrients in the form of a low-strength fertilizer will be applied through the soil vapor points during each of the monthly inspections. Remedial additive monitoring for nitrate, total nitrogen, sulfate, total iron, manganese, magnesium and total phosphorus will continue to be conducted in downgradient wells on a bi-annual basis. As previously reported, this chosen sampling frequency is based on a preponderance of physical evidence, which has reported no concentrations of nutrients or magnesium above MA Drinking Water Standards. Based on the revised WAVE 2 regulations, effective February 14, 2008, Remedial Monitoring Reports (RMRs) will continue to be submitted to the Department electronically concurrent with the Remedy Operation Status Reports every six-months, as required. Air-sparging treatment system Inspections of the air-sparging (AS) system will be conducted concurrent with the monthly bio-venting system inspections. Proper operation of the air-sparging blower and timer will be checked during the inspection. It is also the recommendation of BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., to continue with quarterly groundwater sampling and analysis of monitoring well SEA-1, downgradient of the air sparging point AS-1 to gather additional data on the effectiveness of the AS system in treating dissolved-phase hydrocarbon impact. Additional field-testing is scheduled in March 2008 to evaluate the current operation of the air sparging system. Flow, vacuum and pressure will be measured at AS-1 as well as at SVE points and monitoring wells in the immediate vicinity of AS-1. Based on these results, modifications to the air sparging system may be made. Results of the field-testing and any modifications made to the system will be detailed in subsequent ROS filings. Based on the new WAVE 2 regulations, effective April 2006, Remedial Monitoring Reports (RMRs) will continue to be submitted to the Department concurrent with the Remedy Operation Status Reports every six-months, as required. MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 17 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS D{ Environmental Monitorin : Soil Respiration analysis will continue to be performed quarterly as a measure of system performance. As respiration rates approach those of background concentrations, or on a minimum annual basis, test borings will be conducted for the qualification of soil treatment for EPH and VPH analysis. This information will be compared with baseline test results in review of SVE performance and closure objectives. Soil samples will also be analyzed on an annual basis for wet chemistry and bacteria counts to assure adequate nutrients to support indigenous bacteria populations and to qualify respiration rates for microbial activity. The next soil sampling event is currently scheduled for May 2008. Environmental Monitoring: Groundwater Bi-annual (May/November) groundwater monitoring of the downgradient perimeter monitoring wells GZA-1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW-6S(R)/D will be conducted for EPH with target 4 PAHs and VPH analysis with target BTEX analytes. The most heavily impacted central monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 will also be sampled for EPH and VPH (carbon range only) in November to quantify the fractional petroleum hydrocarbons in comparison to baseline analytical results. On an annual basis (May), EDB and lead analysis (dissolved) will be conducted in the perimeter wells. All sampling will be accompanied by field measurements of dissolved oxygen,pH, conductivity and temperature. Remedial additive monitoring, as described above, will also be conducted on a bi-annual basis in review of any potential degradation to groundwater related to the ORC wall. Furthermore, based on the apparent depletion of the reactive barrier, additional ORC injections may be conducted along the downgradient property line in order to prevent any Condition of Substantial Release Migration(SRM). Soil Removal with Engineered Barrier and Infiltration System Remedial efforts under Comprehensive Response Actions over the past four years have resulted in the reduction of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils and groundwater in a limited capacity wherein the objectives to meet a Class A, RAO is infeasible. Environmental monitoring, however, has characterized "lines of evidence" for stable environmental conditions and attenuation of the petroleum hydrocarbon plume. As based on the premise of technical and financial infeasibility, BEA has recommended the removal of surficial contaminated soils for the construction of an engineered barrier to effectively cap the area of soil contamination against potential dermal exposures and leaching to groundwater in support of a Class C, Response Action Outcome. Competitive bids were solicited for this work and the results of the analysis with the bids and specifications including cross-sections and groundwater flow plans were sent to the client. The implementation of such recommendations remains under review by the PRP and MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 18 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS DX Insurer in support of a Class C, Response Action Outcome. Pending review, BEA is prepared to implement the removal of some of the more heavily impacted, easily accessible (0-3') soils at the Site as well as the construction of the engineered barrier and infiltration system originally proposed in the Remedy Implementation Plan (6/23/03). An "As-build Construction Report including the as As-built plans and specifications, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0875, will be provided to the Department at which time the work is authorized. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The findings of the Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report IX, as represented herein, set forth the rationale and technical justification for the construction of the engineered barrier in support of a Class C-1, Response Action Outcome with Monitored Natural Attenuation. Until such recommendations are authorized and implemented, continuation of the existing bio- remediation strategy as supplemented with air sparging will continue. As such, Operation and Maintenance of the active bioventing system and the environmental monitoring activities will continue within the Phase V Remedy Operation Status. Upon approval by the client, BEA will proceed with oversight of the removal of accessible (0-3') soils at the Site as well as the construction of the engineered barrier and infiltration system originally proposed in the Remedy Implementation Plan in order to expedite Site cleanup and absolve potential Critical Exposure Pathways to meet closure objectives as either a temporary or permanent solution. Operation and maintenance of the bioventing system and air-sparging system, with the inclusion of soil removal and construction of an engineered barrier as appropriate, will be documented over the next six months and reported in ROS Report X in September 2008. Based on the current capacity of the eDEP system, the BWSC-108 Transmittal Forms with RMR's will be electronically filed with a paper copy of the ROPS report to follow within seven days by mail. The LSP opinions represented by this report are established by the certifications made on the Comprehensive Response Action [BWSC-108] Transmittal Form. The LSP opinions are based upon available data and regulations in effect at the time.of this reporting. Should you have any questions or require any further information,please contact me directly. S' rely, E TT& LY, INC. a. NJ17) avid C. ett,LSP Jtiect D. d ma-Wie an P pa P Manager f MARCH 21,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 19 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS IX Encl. Supporting Appendices [A through E] Cc: Hubbard Oil, Inc. -Attn: Evelyn Read, General Manager(Bound Copy) Robert A. Fasanella, Esq. -RUBIN&RUDMAN, LLP (Bound Copy and CD) Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department(Narrative,title page, site plan only) Thomas McKean-Barnstable Board of Health(Narrative,title page, site plan only) John Klimm- Barnstable Town Manager(Narrative, title page, site plan only) John Robichaud, Abutter-Robie's Refrigeration(Narrative,title page, site plan only) REMEDIAL OPERATION STATUS REPORT IX WITH REMEDIAL MONITORING STATUS REPORT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN 4-0824/4-15370 Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc. 33 &51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328,Parcel 125 & 126] Hyannis,MA. 02601 Project#B002-3490 MARCH 21,2008 Prepared By:: BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC. 1573 Main Street P.O.Box 1743 Brewster,MA 02631 David C.Bennett,LSP. Prepared For: Mr. Gerard Martin,Chief Sites Management&Permitting Section,BWSC Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office(SERO) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup(BWSC)/Sites Management Program(SMP) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville,MA 02347 On Behalf Of: Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc. P.O.Box 10-Hyannis,MA 02601 Evelyn Read,General Manager APPENDIX A: Reference Plans -Figure 1: Site Locus Plan from USGS Topographic Quad.,Hyannis-Excerpt(TOPO 1998) -Figure 2:MA DEP BWSC GIS Map,Hyannis-Excerpt(MA DEP 9/29/00) -Figure 3:Water Table Contour Map Excerpt,Town of Barnstable, 1992 -Site Plans: ROS-1 - 'Comprehensive Response Actions...",Prepared by BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC.,Dated March 16,2006(rev. 3/21/08) CS-1 - "Geologic Cross-section", Prepared by BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC.,Dated September 5,2007(rev.3/21/08) GW-1 - Site-specific Groundwater Flow Direction, Prepared by BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC.,Dated September 5,2007(rev.3/21/08) APPENDIX B: Field Reports -Field Inspection Reports:#56(9/19/07)through#63 (3/2/08) -Monitor Well Sampling Logs: 11/14& 15/07,2/15/08 -Respiration Analysis Logs: 11/15/07,2/15/08 -Bioventing System Operation/Monitoring Inspection Forms:#26(9/19/07)through#30(3/3/08) -TOV Tracking Charts-Area A,Area B,All points -Charts:Respiration Values-SVE points Al-S,Al-D,A2-S,A2-D,B3-S,B3-D,B4-S,B4-D APPENDIX C: Environmental Records -BWSC-108: Comprehensive Response Actions Transmittal Form -BWSC-108A:Remedial Monitoring Report Transmittal Forms(3) -BWSC-108B:Remedial Monitoring Report Transmittal Forms(2) APPENDIX D: Laboratory Analysis -Table 1:EPH analysis summary-Perimeter Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 2:VPH analysis summary-Perimeter Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 3:EPH analysis summary-Central Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 4:VPH analysis summary-Central Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 5:EPH analysis summary- Soil -Table 6:VPH analysis summary-Soil -Wet chemistry Tracking Charts-Perimeter wells [GZA-2,MW-5S,MW-6S(R)] -Groundwater Analytical Laboratory Reports: [Groundwater 10/4/07, 12/4/07, 12/4/07,3/5/08] APPENDIX E: Quality Assurance/Quality Control BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS,ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS,GEOLOGISTS,SANITARIANS 1573 Main Street,P.O. Bog 1743 (508)896-1706 Brewster,MA 02631 fax(508)896-5109 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: DATE: JOB NUMBER: Mr.Gerard Martin, Section Chief 09/29/2008 BEA02-3490 BWSC/SMP MA DEP-SERO 20 Riverside Drive REGARDING: Lakeville,MA 02347 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT WITH REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Hubbard Oil Company,Inc.-RTN 4-0824(Linked to RTN#4-15370) SHIPPING METHOD: 33 and 51 Brooks Road[Assessors Map 328,Parcel 125 and 126] Hyannis,MA 02601 Regular Mail ❑ Pick Up ❑ Priority Mail ❑ Hand Deliver ❑ Express Mail ❑ Other uploaded ❑X Certified Mail ❑ Green Card/RR ❑ COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 09/17/2008 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT WITH REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Hubbard Oil Company,Inc.-RTN 4-0824(Linked to RTN#4-15370) 33 and 51 Brooks Road[Assessors Map 328,Parcel 125 and 126] Hyannis,MA 02601 For review and comment: ❑ For approval: ❑ As requested: ❑ 1 For—' use: X ,r , ~�1 (.A) REMARKS: v cc: Hubbard Oil,Inc.-Attn:Evelyn Read,General Manager(Bound Copy) �w Robert A.Fasanella,Esq.-RUBIN&RUDMAN,LLP(Bound Copy and CD) tU Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department(Narrative,title page,site plan only) Thomas McKean-Barnstable Board of Health(Narrative,title page,site plan only) —� John Klimm-Barnstable Town Manager(Narrative,title page,site plan only) r John Robichaud,Abutter-Robie's Refrigeration(Narrative,title page,site plan only) FROM: If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once i BENNETTENVIRONMENTALAsSOCIATES, INC. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS 6 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 6 GEOLOGISTS 0 SANITARIANS 1573 Main Street-P.O. Box 1743, Brewster, MA 02631 6 508-896-1706 6 Fax 508-896-5109 & www.bennett-ea.com B002-3490 September 17, 2008 Mr. Gerard Martin, Section Chief Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC)/Sites Management Program (SMP) MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office (SERO) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 RE: PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT WITH REMEDIAL MONITORING REPORT Hubbard Oil Company. Inc. -RTN 4-0824 (Linked to RTN#4-15370) 33 and 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328, Parcel 125 and 126] Hyannis, MA 02601 Dear Mr. Martin, On behalf of our client, Hubbard Oil; Inc., BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC. (herein referred to as BEA) has prepared this Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report with Remedial Monitoring Report for the above referenced Site, as consistent with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0893. This filing documents the remedial response actions and environmental monitoring activities conducted at the Site over the past six (6) months associated with the operation and maintenance of an active bioventing remedial system. Environmental monitoring over the period includes microbial respiration analysis, soil and groundwater sampling and laboratory testing in review of any potential exposures to identified human and environmental receptors and as a measure of remedial performance relative to project closure objectives. Over the reporting period, microbial respiration rates indicate stable biological activity and effective hydrocarbon mineralization in impacted soils as consistent with earlier soil testing. Laboratory analysis of downgradient monitoring wells have indicated fractional Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon (EPH) and target analyte concentrations as below reporting limits (BRL) of the analysis as well as significantly below the applicable and most restrictive GW-1, Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards. Remedial efforts under Comprehensive Response Actions over the past five years have resulted in the reduction of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils and groundwater in a limited capacity. Environmental monitoring, however, has characterized "lines of evidence" for stable environmental conditions and attenuation of the dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbon plume. Based on issues of apparent technical infeasibility to meet a permanent solution, BEA has recommended the removal of surficial contaminated soils and the construction of an infiltration 1 EMERGENCY SPILL RESPONSE A WASTE SITE CLEANUP SITE ASSESSMENT 6 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING 6 LAND USE PLANNING WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT,OPERATION&MAINTENANCE 0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT,OPERATION&MAINTENANCE SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 2 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT trench and engineered barrier in support of a Class C, Response Action Outcome as a Temporary Solution. Subsequent to the filing of this report, BEA will terminate the air sparging system and the active bioventing system, in favor of a passive venting system. This move towards a passive system is due to the limited effect of the air sparging point to treat groundwater and the inability of the active bioventing system to treat surficial soils. Following the removal of the impacted surficial soils and the installation of the infiltration trench and engineered barrier a revised Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan with"as-built" construction plans will be offered in conjunction with a Phase V Completion report in moving towards a Class C-1 RAO as a Temporary Solution. This Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report is an addendum to, and an essential part of, the public record for Site characterization, risk assessment of exposure pathways and corrective remedial efforts under Comprehensive Response Actions as a Tier 1 C Site. For the purposes of this report, the previous information offered is omitted as redundant and summarized only to orient the reader. For specific information on historic environmental assessment activities and remedial response actions, the reader should reference the "Phase I Limited Site Investigation" [LCR (2/20/90)], "Phase I - Initial Site Investigation with Tier Classification" [RAM (8/9/96)], "Immediate Response Action Completion Report" [SEA (8/11/00)], and the Phase II Scope of Work (9/20/02), Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Completion Statement (11/18/02), and Phase III Identification, Evaluation and Selection of Comprehensive Response Actions (2/18/03), Phase IV Implementation of Selected Remedial Action Alternatives (6/23/03), Remedy Operation Status Report I (12/30/03), through Remedy Operation Status Report III (3/8/05), Phase IV Completion Statement, Remedy Operation Status Report IV (9/27/05), Remedy Operation Status V (3/16/06) Remedy Operation Status VI (9/7/06), Remedy Operation Status Report VII (3/7/07), Remedy Operation Status Report VIII (9/17/07) and the most recent Remedy Operation Status Report X (3/21/08) documents prepared by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. as filed with the MA DEP (SERO). As of January 28, 2008, BEA is the named successor to BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC. The work represented within this document, has proceeded under my supervision in a manner consistent with 309 CMR 4.02 (2), the MCP Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS), pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0191 and Quality Assurance/Quality Control policies of BEA. The facts and statements herein are, to the best of our knowledge, a true and accurate representation of the current Site activities, remedial response actions and environmental conditions associated with the project. As such, this document serves as the technical justification and rationale for the LSP Opinions represented by the certifications on the Comprehensive Response Action transmittal forms attached relative to current regulations and standard of care practices at the time of filing. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL The subject property has historically been the location of bulk fuel storage and distribution. Through time (1940-1985), various releases of petroleum hydrocarbons have occurred from the handling and transfer of fuels and from leakage of tanks and lines. The Phase II Investigation conducted in 2002 was used to identify three distinct areas of soil contamination SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 3 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT from specific sources. Zone A is an area in the north central portion of the property that corresponds to the location of former aboveground fuel tanks for the storage of fuel oil. It is reported that the containment facilities around the tanks were concrete walls with an earthen bottom. These tanks lead to a fueling rack to the south of the containment facility. In the 60' x 55' area defined, gross weathered soil impact extends from the surface through the entire soil column to the groundwater at 28 ` below grade. A second area, Zone B, in the east central portion of the property corresponds to the area of former above ground and underground tanks historically used for both fuel oil and gasoline. There is a reference to a leaking above ground gasoline tank in this area. Soil testing indicates that although gasoline impact is predominant in this area, fuel oil impacts are comingled with the gasoline as attributed to handling and transfer of fuel to a loading rack that existed to the west. Zone B is defined as a 65' x 45' area of soil impact extending from the surface throughout the soil column to groundwater at 28' below grade. A third area of minor soil impact is located adjacent to the inactive 100,000 gallon above ground tank. This impact is surficial as attributed to minor leakage of fuel oil from valving and lines at the base of the tank. Zone C is a 10' x 15' area of soil impact to a depth of 5'. Based on mass balance computations, it appears that over 50 years of operation as a bulk fuel plant, some 5,000+ gallons of fuel oil and gasoline may have been released as entering the groundwater and traveling east in a downgradient direction towards the Barnstable Water Company well field property line as within 1000' of the release area. Groundwater testing of multi-level downgradient monitoring wells shows that the extent of dissolved phase groundwater impact had extended 200-300' downgradient of the release areas across the railroad easement and onto the abutting property. Groundwater impact is limited to the upper portion of the unconfined sand aquifer. The extent of groundwater impact is currently defined by the sentinel wells on the abutting property intermediate to the well field. These wells monitor a Critical Exposure Pathway as critical samples. Additional monitoring wells immediately downgradient of Zone A and Zone B are tested for EPH and VPH without target analytes in review of treatment performance. In addition, TOV monitoring of the bioventing system and respiration analysis (carbon dioxide/oxygen/methane) is used as indicators of source removal as is periodically qualified by borings and soil sampling for EPH and/or VPH analysis. Under Phase III, a remedial strategy was piloted and subsequently developed to stabilize the groundwater plume, reduce contaminant source and isolate impacted soils from direct contact and further leaching of contaminants to groundwater. The Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan (RIP) proposed the construction of a reactive barrier, removal and capping of surficial soils and bioventing with use of remedial additives was set forth. In 2005, the reactive barrier and bioventing system were installed and active remediation commenced. The soil removals and the infiltration/capping system portion of the RIP were never implemented, as complicated by Eminent Domain proceedings against the property and negotiations of coverage and reimbursement by the PRP's Insurer. Most recently a sparge component has been piloted as part of the Remedy Operation Status (ROS) in lieu of the construction of an engineered barrier over the area of shallow soil removal have been proposed as a modification of the Phase IV. SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 4 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT Throughout the period of 2005 to the present day, the remediation strategy implemented has been successful in absolving any issue of further plume migration and successfully reduced contaminant source contributing to documented attenuation of the groundwater plume. Cost to feasibility analysis and past performance evaluations indicate that it is technically and financially infeasible to meet the GW-1 standards to support a Class A Response Action Outcome (RAO) as a permanent solution. Therefore, the full implementation of the remedial strategy with shallow soil removal, engineered barrier with ongoing active biosparging is viewed as an effective regulatory alternative to assure No Substantial Hazard conditions are maintained under a Class C, RAO temporary solution. PHASE V OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING As consistent with the Operation, Maintenance and Environmental Monitoring Plan set forth, BEA performed periodic Site inspections over the reporting period to monitor operations and perform maintenance on the active bio-venting and air-sparging treatment systems in use at the subject Site. These inspections were further utilized to assess environmental conditions and conduct prescribed groundwater sampling in consideration of remedial system performance. A total of eight (8) Site inspections were conducted at the over the past six months on 3/26/08, 4/11/08, 5/5/08, 5/7/08, 6/12/08, 6/13/08, 7/7/08 and 8/15/08. These inspections, and specific daily activities, are documented on field reports in Appendix B and the RMR transmittal forms. The following is a summary of significant events over the past six months. SITE INSPECTIONS Reactive Barrier On May 7, 2008, BEA personnel were at the site with ADH drilling to refresh the reactive barrier at the downgradient property line. The reactive barrier consisted of 500 lbs. of Regenesis' Oxygen Releasing Compound Advanced (ORC-A) injected to the groundwater interface between 23 to 25 feet below grade surface (bgs) at the downgradient property line. The ORC-Advanced was injected by direct push method with a tracked Geoprobe rig. The ORC-Advanced was injected using a grout pump and an injection point on the end of the Geoprobe. Nine injection points were advanced parallel to the downgradient property line and three injection points were advanced within each of the source areas in Zone A and Zone B, as recommended by Regenesis. Bioventing System BEA personnel have conducted regular monthly Site inspections at the Hubbard Site since September 2005. Each time, the vacuum, pressure and magnahelic flow gauges on the regenerative blower were checked and recorded on Bioventing System O&M Inspection Reports documented in Appendix B. Throughout the period, the operating vacuum has been measured between 10" and 11" of water. The moisture trap did not require emptying over the reporting period. The particulate filter was checked and a photoionization detector (PID) was used to record the total organic volatile (TOV) concentrations in the influent air from each SVE point, as SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 5 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT well as between (intermediate) the two GAC units and at the exhaust vent. The two vapor-phase carbon units were changed-out on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 after intermediate break-through was noted. The spent carbon was transported off-site for recycling under a Uniform Bill of Lading. A copy of the Bill of Lading is included for reference in Appendix C. Air-Sparging Syste On February 16, 2007, BEA personnel began an air-sparging Pilot Study as specified in the ROS Status Report VI (9/7/06). The sparging point (AS-1) was installed approximately ten feet northwest (upgradient) of monitoring well SEA-1 and approximately ten feet southeast of bioventing points SVE B-3S and D. During the installation, thirty-five feet of 1'/4" galvanized pipe with a l' stainless steel screen was installed ten feet below the water table to 35' below grade surface (bgs). To install the point, a test boring was performed to the groundwater interface the sparging point was then driven into the vadose zone to avoid creating a preferential pathway for injected air. A two-foot bentonite seal was applied at the groundwater interface and the borehole was backfilled with native material to grade. BEA personnel sampled monitoring well SEA-1, immediately downgradient of sparge point AS-1, on a monthly basis in March, April and May 2007 and quarterly in September and November 2007 and February 2008 to determine the effect of air-sparging on concentrations of dissolved-phase hydrocarbons at that location. Results of the March 2007 sampling event reported concentrations of C 11 to C22 fractional aromatics decreased slightly after the first month of air sparging. Results of the April 2007 sampling event reported an increase in fractional C11 to C22 aromatics in SEA-1, and results of the May 2007 sampling event showed a significant increase in EPH concentrations in SEA-1. Concentrations of C11 to C22 aromatics then reported a significant decrease in September 2007 and increased slightly in November before creeping up again in February 2008. In March of 2008, BEA personnel were at the site to field test the Air Sparging system. BEA personnel determined that the sparge point was getting insufficient pressure to displace the amount of water in the sparge point. BEA personnel installed an air compressor to the air sparge point and determined that the point was completely blocked. As such, BEA personnel returned to the Site with the Jenkins Well Drilling personnel to service the sparge point. The l' stainless steel sparge point was blocked with fine sand. The point was cleaned and reinstalled in the same location. The regenative blower that the sparging system was operating from was replaced with an air compressor to increase the sparge point capacity. Subsequent to the repair of the air sparging point, concentrations of C11 to C22 fractional aromatics did decrease approximately 33 percent in June 2008, however, the reactive barrier was also replenished at the same time, as such, we cannot contribute the decrease in fractional aromatics to repairing the sparging system. SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 6 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT EPH C11 To C22 Fractional Aromatics in SEA-1 Over Time 25,000 23,400 20,000 J_ 15,000 _. . c A800 10,000 ORC Injections UU V BegIn 7,300 7,200 � s��y0 2J18/07 6,40 5,000 - A 3 0 3,840 ORC Injedw 3,400 3,300 4113M 2,100 eia1r AS 1500 \,.,, P'olPit 00 0 Oct-02 Feb- Nov- May- Nov- May- Nov- Mar-07 Apr-07 May- Sep- Nov- Feb- Jun-08 04 04 05 05 06 06 07 07 07 08 Date VPH analysis was also performed to determine the full effect of sparging at the Site in reducing concentrations of dissolved-phase groundwater impacts within the source area monitoring wells. Initially, decreasing concentrations of VPH C9 to C10 fractional Aromatics were reported in September 2007 (1,500 mg/L) and November 2007 (1,400 mg/L). After the November 2008 sampling event concentrations of C9 to C10 Aromatics began to rise again, with the most recent results at 2,000 mg/L (June 2008). A graphical representation of VPH data is depicted below. SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 7 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT VPH Fractional C9-C10 Aromatics in SEA-1 Over Time 7,000 _ ssoo 6,000 5,000 _ J ORC Inl asoa c 4,000 4/�=5 0 ORC Inge&m C 3,000 cPilot7 0 2/1 6JO/07 V 2,000 0 0 1,000 AS Port 5✓5/08 0 — Feb-04 May-06 Nov-06 Sep-07 Nov-07 Fe Jun-08 Date Since the air sparging pilot study began, no significant decreases in fractional petroleum hydrocarbons or target analytes were observed. As such, based on the results of EPH and VPH testing over the past 18 months, BEA has decided to suspend the air sparging system indefinitely. Furthermore, BEA is eliminating the expansion of the air sparging system at the Site in favor of a passive venting system and engineered barrier in order to offer a Revised Phase IV RIP with"as- built" construction plans and Phase V Completion Report in moving towards a Class C RAO as a Temporary Solution. REPRESENTATIVENESS EVALUATION AND DATA USABILITY ASSESSMENT The following presents a discussion of the site information used in the evaluation of CEP's and treatment performance as consistent with the guidance provided in MA DEP Policy WSC-07-350. It provides an evaluation and demonstration of the adequacy of the spatial and temporal data sets used and makes conclusions on the accuracy, precision and sensitivity of the data used. Field Screening Over the reporting period, PID screening for TOV concentrations has been used as an indicator of bioventing system performance as well as a measure of off-gas controls. The PID detector is regularly calibrated by isobutylene to benzene standards. Decreasing TOV concentrations in the SVE/Sparge manifold are attributed to a reduction in petroleum hydrocarbons in affected media. Increasing TOV concentrations in the off-gas intermediate location indicates activated carbon breakthrough as dictating carbon change out. SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 8 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT In addition, gas-monitoring equipment is used for the field-testing of microbial respiration rates. A fan is used to pull three air volumes from the vertical SVE risers after they have been shut down for 24 hours. The measurement of carbon dioxide, methane, oxygen and hydrogen sulfide is recorded as relative percentages. Oxygen depletion (< 20%) and significant carbon dioxide accumulation(>3%) are viewed as a measure of microbial mineralization. This field screening is periodically quantified by physical testing of impacted soils and groundwater. Field screening is also used for selective of representative samples as typically positive TOV biased. Sampling Locations Initial soil sampling was conducted as focused on areas of historic activities and noted soil staining and prior pre-MCP investigations. Subsequent soil sampling was conducted progressively as 10' offsets to previous locations wherein soil conditions of high permeability typically demonstrate minimal horizontal dispersion of contaminants through the soil column. This work was used to define the vertical and horizontal extent of soil impacts and characterize the source of such impact in directing the selection of target analytes. TPH, VPH/ EPH with target analytes and 8260 VOC sampling has been conducted during the course of the CRA activities. This information has been used to develop sampling protocols for representative methods and for the exclusive of target analytes as substantiated by a preponderance of evidence. No soil sampling has been conducted in this reporting period. Groundwater samples from downgradient perimeter wells are collected as critical samples in the evaluation of CEPs associated with potential ingestion of contaminated drinking water. There are multi-level wells to test the shallow and intermediate portions of the aquifer. The well locations have been confirmed to be representative as based on groundwater flow direction. The deeper wells are set at depth that is intermediate to the screened interval of the PWS wells. Solute transport modeling from slug testing and hydraulic gradient measurements indicates that the samples are certainly within the projected time of travel. Groundwater samples for perimeter downgradient wells were tested in June 2008 during the reporting period. These wells were analyzed by VPH/EPH methods with target analytes reported. Only the fuel oil/diesel oil related PAH compounds are reported as based on prior characterization. These PAH compounds were exclusively reported above detection limits in the area of release and other PAH compounds previously detected in sentinel monitoring wells were attributed to coal tar derivatives from the abutting railway easement as exempt from notification under the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0317(9) and representing background conditions. Additionally, only select metals were used for remedial additive monitoring as specific to ORC. Other than these issues identified in Section F of the Compendium of Analytical Method (CAM), all other responses were in the affirmative and Presumptive Certainty of the data was met. Additional groundwater sampling in the reporting period was conducted in June 2008 at the interior SEA-1 and SEA-2 monitoring wells. Again, all the responses were affirmative on the CAM Certification with the exception of Section F. EPH/VPH methods were used but no target SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 9 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT analytes reported for interior monitoring wells. These methods were chosen as a cost savings measure, wherein only performance is evaluated based on relative changes in the fractional compounds. As such, Presumptive Certainty of the data is met for the intended purpose of performance evaluation. Field duplicates or trip blanks were not collected or considered necessary for the reporting period as based on a preponderance of historic evidence. Over the past five years of monitoring, perimeter wells typically report all fractional compounds and target analytes as BRL or at low concentrations wherein the reported concentration or reporting limits are significantly less that the most restrictive GW-1 and GW-3, Method 1 — Risk Characterization standards. EPH/VPH samples were collected by low flow method and placed in appropriately preserved containers and kept within a cooler with ice and subsequently within a refrigerator pending shipment to the laboratory under a chain-of-custody. Data Inconsistency No inconsistent data was identified for the reporting period. Visual observations, odors and field screening were generally well correlated. The results of the groundwater sampling are consistent with field and historic data. Data Not Used All the data was used for the expressed purposes of CEP evaluation of potential risks or for performance evaluation. Data Usability Groundwater samples collected from the Site in the reporting period were done so in a manner consistent with Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS) of the MCP wherein field screening and past analytical data reporting was used as a guide to sampling protocol and analytical methods employed. All samples were submitted to a MA Certified laboratory, and all groundwater samples were collected upon meeting purge requirements and/or the stabilization of field measurements (temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen and pH). All received laboratory analytical results were reviewed and validated by BEA upon receipt with verification that Presumptive Certainty requirements were met, and/or that the reported values were technically justified as described in CAM VII A, Section 2.0 (a), (b), (c), and (d). As such, samples and data collected were reviewed in consideration of exposure risks and have been deemed valid and scientifically justified by Site-specific hydrogeologic conditions, aquifer characterization and solute transport modeling represented in the Conceptual Site Model presented herein, in accordance with the Representative Evaluation and Data Usability (REDUA) guidance requirements under the MA DEP Policy WSC-07-350. SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 10 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING/RISK CHARACTERIZATION [APPENDIX B & D] On June 12 and 13, 2008 BEA personnel were on Site to complete semi-annual groundwater sampling of select downgradient and source area monitoring wells in review of potential exposure pathways, as specified in the Environmental Monitoring section of the previous Remedy Operation Status report. Downgradient monitoring wells GZA-1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW-6S(R)/D on the Robies Refrigeration property were gauged, purged, and sampled for EPH with target-4 poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), VPH with target BTEX analytes and EDB/DBCP and lead. Source area monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 were also gauged, purged and sampled for VPH/EPH carbon range only (CRO) as a measure of remedial performance. Remedial additive testing was also performed in downgradient monitoring wells as previously noted. Perimeter Monitoring Wells Results of the June 2008 semi-annual sampling event reported all concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH and target analytes in all perimeter monitoring wells were reported as below the reporting limits of the analysis. In each case, the reported value or reporting limit was significantly less than the applicable GW-1 and GW-3, Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. Interior Monitoring Wells Results of the June 2008 sampling event reported decreasing concentrations of fractional EPH in central-area monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2. However, both monitoring wells SEA- 1 (4,300 ug/L) and SEA-2 (570 ug/L) reported concentrations of fractional C11 to C22 aromatics exceeding the GW-1 standards. Concentrations of VPH fractional C9 to C10 aromatics in monitoring well SEA-1 were noted as slightly increasing from 1,800 ug/L in November 2007 to 2,000 ug/L in June 2008. Concentrations of C9 to C10 aromatics in interior monitoring well SEA-2 decreased from 220 ug/L in November 2007 to 110 ug/L in June of 2008, which is below the applicable Method 1 GW-1 Risk Characterization Standards. A summary of groundwater laboratory analysis is presented in Table 3 and Table 4 located in Appendix D of this report. Soil On July 7, 2008 BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. was at the Site to conduct soil sampling in review of remedial system performance. Three test borings were conducted at the Site in Zones A and B of delineated impact. The borings were performed using a Mobile Drill B-61 drilling rig with 4 1/4 inch augers. Soil samples were collected every five (5) feet using a two (2) foot split-spoon sampler. Test boring TB-6C was performed in the southern portion of the Site in the area of Zone B, in near proximity to SVE-B4. Test boring TB- 8C was also performed in the southern portion of the Site within Zone B. Test boring TB-11C was performed in the central portion of the Site in the area of Zone A. Soil samples were collected in two (2) foot intervals and screened in the field with a photoionization detector by"jar SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 11 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT headspace" method. Three discreet intervals from each test boring including 3-5', 8-15' and 18- 25' bgs were prepared, preserved and forwarded to Groundwater Analytical Laboratory for EPH and VPH analysis (carbon range only). Results of the annual soil sampling event were reported on July 22, 2008. Laboratory analytical data reported concentrations of EPH and VPH significantly above the applicable Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards in the shallow (3-5' bgs) samples collected from the TB-11 C (Zone A) location. Elevated concentrations of fractional EPH were also observed in the TB-6C and TB-8C (Zone B) locations. Concentrations of VPH in the TB-8C and TB-6C (Zone B) locations remained consistent with previous results. EPH and VPH concentrations in the intermediate (8-15' bgs) interval in were observed to decrease in all locations. EPH and VPH concentrations remained consistent with previous results in the deep (18-25') interval in all locations. Concentrations of EPH in excess of applicable Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards were noted in the shallow interval in TB-11 C. Concentrations of VPH were reported in excess of the applicable standards in the shallow interval in TB-11C and the deep interval of TB-8C. No exceedances were reported above the applicable Standards in any samples collected from TB-6C. Concentrations of fractional EPH/VPH were reported either as present but below the applicable soil Standards, or as below the reporting limits of the analysis in all other samples submitted. A summary of soil laboratory analysis is presented in Table 5 and Table 6 located in Appendix D of this report The results of the annual soil-sampling event demonstrate positive treatment of soils in the intermediate and deep horizons, wherein the bioventing remedial system has served to decrease concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH. However, laboratory analytical results also indicate impacts to potentially accessible soils at 3-5' bgs remain untreated, wherein the reported concentrations are exceeding the applicable S-2/GW-1 Method 1 — Risk Characterization Standards, as well as the S-2 Method 2 Direct Contact Standard for fractional EPH (C9 to C18) at TB-1 IC. Results of soil sampling over the past thirty-six months only serves to reaffirm our previous recommendation for the excavation and disposal of surficial contaminated soils, the construction of an infiltration trench and engineered barrier, within the areas of excavation as part of the remedial strategy to meet closure objectives. Pending review by the client, BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. is prepared to proceed with soil removal, infiltration system and engineered barrier construction prescribed by the RIP and to suspend the active bioventing system in favor of a passive system to move the project into a Class C RAO as a Temporary Solution. SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 12 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT Microbial Respiration Analysis_ Respiration analysis was performed on August 15, 2008, in order to compare baseline and post-venting conditions of bacterial respiration to current respiration rates, as well as to track such rates and reported TOV concentrations as a measure of relative treatment performance. Previous analysis of soils collected from SVE A-1 and SVE B-3 indicated sufficient indigenous bacteria with a lack of sufficient nutrients. As such, supplemental nutrient additions were made, by introducing a low-strength fertilizer through the soil vapor points, during monthly Site inspections conducted throughout the reporting period. Baseline respiration analysis indicated superior biological activity with minimal methane observed in some of the more heavily impacted vapor points, as an indicator of anaerobic respiration and an oxygen-limited environment. Significant carbon dioxide accumulation was also observed. Respiration analysis conducted on August 15, 2008 indicated average biological activity but with decreasing respiration rates in the majority of SVE points. Compared to baseline and previously measured conditions, average methane concentrations increased significantly to an average of 1.0 %, compared to the 0.46% recorded during baseline analysis and 0.025% recorded during respiration analysis in February 2008. An average oxygen concentration of 14.69 % was established as comparable to baseline (7.86%) and previously observed concentrations (17.25%) in February 2008. Average carbon dioxide concentrations increased slightly to 4.25 % from the 2.5625 % established in February 2008, and were noted to still be significantly below the concentration established through baseline analysis (9.3%). Results of the most recent respiration analysis continue to show oxygen depletion relative to an atmospheric concentration of 20% with carbon dioxide accumulations as lines of evidence indicating microbial mineralization of petroleum hydrocarbons. Performance of bioventing is qualified by reductions in measured TOV concentration at the exhaust manifold and by physical testing wherein petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations have decreased in soil and groundwater samples through time. Results of the respiration analyses are included for reference in Appendix B. Respiration analysis tracking charts are also provided for reference in Appendix B. REMEDIAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SOil/Bio-ventini? Soil sampling was performed on July 7, 2008 to qualify the reduction of petroleum concentrations in vadose zone soils in the areas of identified impact. As previously noted, soil sampling was conducted via three test borings; two in Zone B (TB-6C and TB-8C) and one in Zone A (TB-11C). Samples were collected in two-foot intervals, every five feet and then composited into three distinct intervals (3-5', 8-15' and 18-25') for analysis. Soil samples were analyzed for EPH and VPH and the results were compared with samples collected from similar i SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 13 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT locations during Phase H activities conducted in October 2002 and performance sampling conducted in May 2006 and May 2007 The most recent soil sampling conducted in shallow soils (3-5' bgs) in Zone A indicates that high levels of residual soil impact remain present in the near surface soils. The current bioventing remedial system is not adequately treating this shallow soil impact as readily accessible. Concentrations of residual soil impact in the intermediate and deeper depths in Zones A and B have been responding well to the bioventing system with concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH concentrations below the applicable S-2 and S-3 Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards, with the exception of TB-8C: 18-25' (350 ug/L), which remains marginally above the S-3/GW-1 standard of 300 ug/L. As such, BEA has subsequently reasserted our recommendation for the mechanical removal of surficial soils and the construction of an infiltration system and engineered barrier at the Site to eliminate the direct contact exposures and absolve the potential leaching of contaminants within the soils to groundwater as a chronic and persistent source of groundwater impact. As such, we shall focus our review of performance sampling on the intermediate (8 or 10 to 15' bgs) and deep (18 to 25') samples collected. In TB-11C, in both the 8-15' and 18-25' intervals, concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH were reported below the applicable S-2 and S-3 Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards and continue to show decreasing numbers. The significant reductions in petroleum hydrocarbons indicate effective treatment in soils at this location. At the TB-6C location, concentrations of EPH and VPH reported in the 8-15' and 18-25' intervals were also reported as below applicable S-2 and S-3/GW-1 and GW-3 standards, as well as the most stringent S-1/GW-1, Method 1 — Risk Characterization Standards. Decreasing concentrations with only trace concentrations indicate effective treatment at this location. In test boring TB-8C, concentrations of all EPH fractions decreased in the 8-15' interval but increased in the 18-25' interval as compared with previous analytical results. However, all EPH fractions continue to be reported below the applicable Method 1 standards in each of these intervals. In addition, the C9 to C10 fractional VPH concentrations were also reported as decreasing in these two intervals. However the concentrations of fractional C9 to C10 VPH continued to be reported as above the applicable standard in the 18-25' interval. Concentrations of all VPH fractions were reported below the applicable standards in the 8-15' interval. Petroleum hydrocarbons are also being removed from impacted soils via volatilization and vapor extraction. Calculations of the amount of hydrocarbons removed from the soil were made based on the average concentration of TOV readings (40 ppm) being removed by the regenerative blower operating four(4) hours a day (2x/day for 2 hours) since September 23, 2005 (1,082 days) with an average flow of 50SCFM. This information indicates that over 20 gallons of petroleum hydrocarbons have been removed over the course of the system operation as an additional benefit of the bioventing strategy. The actual reduction in hydrocarbon mass is SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 14 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT expected to be much greater due to mineralization of contaminants by indigenous microbes in the soil, as qualified by the most recent soil testing in July 2008. Mass balance concentrations showing an average reduction of 603 ppm of TPH in 3,887 cubic yards of material from zones A and B, indicates that the RIP/ROP has accounted for the removal of some 7,000 lbs of hydrocarbons (875 gallons) removed from soils at the Site [3,887 yds x 3,000 lbs/yd = 11,661,000 lbs x 0.0006 %TPH=7,000 lbs of hydrocarbons/ 8lbs/gal = 875 gallons] . Groundwater/Reactive Barrier The remedial additive ORC-Advanced was re-applied as a reactive barrier at the downgradient property line as well as within the source area in May 2008 based on laboratory analytical results of downgradient perimeter monitoring wells indicating the diminishing capacity of the ORC-Advanced to act as an oxygen barrier. Over the past 18-months BEA has been operating an air sparging system upgradient of monitoring well SEA-1 as a pilot study to evaluate if groundwater impact may be treated more effectively. The influence of the supplemental sparge treatments was further evaluated over the past 18 months by regular sampling for treatment performance. Results of the air sparging system pilot study did not indicate any significant reductions in fractional EPH and VPH. As such, during the next monthly inspection the air sparging system will be suspended. The most recent results from groundwater sampling conducted in June 2008 report decreasing concentrations of fractional EPH C11 to C22 aromatics, with a result of 4,300 mg/L down from 6,400mg/L in February 2008. Concentrations of VPH fractional C9 to C10 aromatics reported a slight increase in June with a result of 2,000 ug/L, up from 1,800 ug/L in February 2008. These fluctuations in fractional EPH concentrations have been observed at the Site for the past several years and it is believed that the concentrations of dissolved-phase hydrocarbon impact rise concurrent with fluctuations in groundwater. Remedial Additive Monitoring During the June 2008 sampling event, the perimeter monitoring wells were sampled for wet chemistry in accordance with the provisions for remedial additive use, 310 CMR 40.0046. Wet chemistry analysis included nitrate, total nitrogen, sulfate, total iron, manganese, magnesium and total phosphorus. Concentrations of wet chemistry parameters observed over the reporting period have been consistent with baseline/background concentrations as indicating no significant degradation of water quality associated with remedial treatments downgradient of the treatment area. Wet chemistry tracking charts are included for reference in Appendix D. i SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 15 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT RISK CHARACTERIZATION AND REVIEW OF SUBSTANTIAL HAZARD Groundwater Contaminant concentrations in groundwater sampling of central wells SEA-1 and SEA-2, located immediately downgradient of the source areas on the Hubbard property, continue to fluctuate. Regardless, Mann-Kendall statistical evaluations of laboratory results from 2002 through current data indicate a negative fifteen (45) value at SEA-1 and a negative seven (-7) value at SEA-2, representing statistically decreasing concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons at these locations [Refer to Tables 5 and 6]. Table 5: Mann-Kendall Worksheet for SEA-1 (TPH) Date 10/02 2/04 11/04 5/05 11/05 5/06 11/06 3/07 4/07 5/07 9/07 11/07 2/07 6/08 Totals Conc.(mg/L) 6.4 26.0 23.0 12.0 39.0 11.9 5.19 4.66 9.41 34.70 3.65 7.36 15.1 14.6 6.4 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +1 +7 26.0 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -8 23.0 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -7 12.0 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -3 39.0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -9 11.9 1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -2 5.19 -1 +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +1 +3 4.66 -1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +1 +2 9.41 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 +2 34.70 -1 -1 -1 -1 -4 3.65 +1 +1 +1 +3 7.36 +1 +1 +2 15.1 -1 -1 14.6 Total -15 Table 6: Mann-Kendall Worksheet for SEA-2 (TPH) Date 10/02 2/5/04 11/04 5/05 11/05 5/06 11/06 5/07 11/07 6/08 Totals Conc.(mg/L) 40.0 6.45 81.0 2.1 2.6 33.4 1.27 3.22 11.2 1.59 40.0 -1 +1 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -5 6.45 +1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -2 81.0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -7 SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 16 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT Table 6: Mann-Kendall Worksheet for SEA-2 (TPH) Date 10/02 2/5/04 11/04 5105 11105 5/06 11/06 5/07 11/07 6/08 Totals Conc.(mg/L) 40.0 6.45 81.0 2.1 2.6 33.4 1.27 3.22 11.2 1.59 2.1 +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 -1 +2 2.6 +1 -1 +1 +1 -1 +1 33.4 -1 -1 -1 -1 -4 1.27 +1 +1 +1 +3 3.22 +1 -1 0 11.2 -1 -1 1.59 Total -13 During the reporting period, and throughout testing conducted over the past 72 months, all concentrations of EPH and VPH and associated target analytes in downgradient monitoring wells have been consistently reported as at or below the applicable GW-1 and GW-3, Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. Based on the statistical evaluation of petroleum hydrocarbon reduction in the source areas and the absence of impacts in downgradient monitoring wells, an attenuating plume of reduced size and decreasing groundwater concentrations is indicated. As such, there is no Condition of Substantial Release Migration nor any completed Critical Exposure Pathway relative to potential ingestion, inhalation or dermal contact exposures to identified human receptors or significant environmental impacts to ecological receptors as associated with groundwater impacts related to the Site. Soils In addition, although there may be potential human exposures associated with surficial soil impacts, these areas are publicly restricted, with no children present, by a gated 6' chain-link fence with No Trespassing signs along the perimeter of the property which is patrolled and monitored during business operations and locked at all other times. Employees of Hubbard Oil have been advised of environmental hazards. BEA has also recommended the removal of shallow accessible soils (0-3' bgs) to negate issues related to petroleum impact in these surficial soils. Therefore, there is neither a condition of Imminent Hazard nor any Substantial Hazards associated with the Site under current Site conditions, as dependent upon restricted access by locked fencing, signage, patrolling and monitoring of the area of release area on the subject property. SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROAD/BEA08-3490 PAGE 17 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT FUTURE OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Bio-venting_System Operation& Maintenance: As previously noted, during the next monthly inspection in September 2008, the active bioventing system will be suspended and the effects evaluated. Results of the most recent soil analysis indicate concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH as below the applicable Method 1 S- 2 and S-3 Risk Characterization Standards with the exception of the shallow surficial soils, which the bioventing system cannot effectively treat, as well as at the TB-8C location at the groundwater interface. Subsequent to the suspension of the active system, a turbine vent will be installed on the vapor points to passively vent the vapor points. Nutrients in the form of a low- strength fertilizer will still be applied through the soil vapor points during each of the monthly inspections. Remedial additive monitoring for nitrate, magnesium and dissolved phosphorus will continue to be conducted in downgradient wells on a semi-annual basis. As previously reported, this chosen sampling frequency is based on a preponderance of physical evidence, which has reported no concentrations of nutrients or magnesium above MA Drinking Water Standards. Based on the revised WAVE 2 regulations, effective February 14, 2008, Remedial Monitoring Reports (RMRs) will continue to be submitted to the Department electronically concurrent with the Remedy Operation Status Reports every six-months, as required. Air-sparring treatment system As previously reported, over the past eighteen months, of operation the sparging system failed to produce any further significant reduction in fractional EPH and VPH as anticipated. As such, during the next monthly inspection in September 2008, the active air sparging system will be suspended indefinitely. Environmental Monitoring: Soil The frequency of respiration analysis will be performed semi-annually as a measure of system performance. No further soil testing is required in the future. Results of the most recent soil sampling event report concentrations of fractional EPH and VPH below the Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards with the exception of surficial soils (0-3') and soils at the capillary fringe. The proposed removal of the surficial soils with end-point sampling and the installation of an infiltration trench and engineered barrier will serve to isolate any residual impact in consideration of Significant Risk. In addition, soil impact at the capillary fringe is best evaluated by groundwater impact at the source-area monitoring wells. i SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 18 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT Environmental Monitoring: Groundwater Semi-annual (May/November) groundwater monitoring of the downgradient perimeter monitoring wells GZA-1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW-6S(R)/D will be conducted for EPH with target 4 PAHs and VPH analysis with target BTEX analytes. The frequency of sampling the most heavily impacted central monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 will be reduced to a five-year basis in conjunction with soil sampling. The central wells will also be sampled for EPH and VPH (carbon range only) to quantify the fractional petroleum hydrocarbons in comparison to baseline analytical results. All sampling will be accompanied by field measurements of dissolved oxygen,pH, conductivity and temperature. Remedial additive monitoring, as described above, will also be conducted on a semi-annual basis in review of any potential degradation to groundwater related to the ORC wall. Soil Removal with Engineered Barrier and Infiltration SyLtern Remedial efforts under Comprehensive Response Actions over the past five years have resulted in the significant reduction of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils and groundwater. However, Reducing groundwater concentrations below the Method 1 GW-1 groundwater standards to meet a Class A, RAO is apparently infeasible at the present time. Environmental monitoring, however, has characterized "lines of evidence" for stable environmental conditions and attenuation of the petroleum hydrocarbon plume. As based on the premise of technical infeasibility, BEA has recommended the removal of surficial contaminated soils for the construction of an engineered barrier to effectively cap the area of soil contamination against potential dermal exposures and leaching to groundwater in support of a Class C, Response Action Outcome. Competitive bids were solicited for this work and the results of the analysis with the bids and specifications including cross-sections and groundwater flow plans were previously sent to the client. The implementation of such recommendations remains under review by the PRP and pending settlements with the Insurer, BEA is prepared to implement the removal of some of the more heavily impacted, easily accessible (0-3') soils at the Site as well as the construction of the engineered barrier and infiltration system originally proposed in the Remedy Implementation Plan (6/23/03). An "As-build Construction Report including the as As- built plans and specifications for the infiltration system and engineered barrier, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0875, will be provided to the Department at which time the work is completed. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The findings of the Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report, as represented herein, set forth the rationale and technical justification for the termination of the air sparging and active bioventing system in favor of a passive venting system with remedial monitoring. This move towards a passive system is due to the limited effect of the air sparging point to treat groundwater and the inability of the active bioventing system to treat surficial soils. However, environmental monitoring has characterized "lines of evidence" for stable environmental conditions and I SEPTEMBER 17,2008 HUBBARD-BROOKS ROADBEA08-3490 PAGE 19 OF 19 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT attenuation of the dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbon plume. Based on issues of apparent technical infeasibility to meet a permanent solution, BEA has recommended the removal of surficial contaminated soils and the construction of an infiltration trench and engineered barrier in support of a Temporary Solution. Following the removal of the impacted surficial soils and the installation of the infiltration trench and engineered barrier a revised Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan with "as-built" construction plans will be offered in conjunction with a Phase V Completion report in moving towards the Class C-1 RAO as a Temporary Solution. Upon settlement with the Insurer and approval by the client, BEA will proceed with oversight of the removal of accessible (0-3') soils at the Site as well as the construction of the engineered barrier and infiltration system originally proposed in the Remedy Implementation Plan in order to expedite Site cleanup and absolve potential Critical Exposure Pathways to meet closure objectives as either a temporary or permanent solution. Periodic groundwater sampling, termination of the active bioventing system, with the inclusion of soil removal and construction of an engineered barrier as appropriate, will be documented over the next six months and reported in a Phase V Status Report in March 2009. The LSP opinions represented by this report are established by the certifications made on the Comprehensive Response Action [BWSC-108] Transmittal Form. The LSP opinions are based upon available data and regulations in effect at the time of this reporting. Should you have any questions or require any further information,please contact me directly. Sincerely, BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. I avid C. Benne , LSP Jo D. T dema-Wiel t Principal P iect Manager Encl. Supporting Appendices [A through E] cc: Hubbard Oil, Inc. - Attn: Evelyn Read, General Manager(Bound Copy) Robert A. Fasanella, Esq. - RUBIN& RUDMAN, LLP (Bound Copy and CD) Lieutenant Hubler- Hyannis Fire Department(Narrative,title page, site plan only) Thomas McKean- Barnstable Board of Health(Narrative, title page, site plan only) John Klimm- Barnstable Town Manager(Narrative,title page, site plan only) John Robichaud,Abutter-Robie's Refrigeration(Narrative,title page, site plan only) REMEDIAL OPERATION STATUS REPORT X WITH REMEDIAL MONITORING STATUS REPORT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN 4-0824/4-15370 Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc. 33 & 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328,Parcel 125 & 126] Hyannis,MA. 02601 Project#B002-3490 SEPTEMBER 17,2008 Prepared By BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC. 1573 Main Street P.O. Box 1743 Brewster,MA 02631 David C.Bennett,LSP. Prepared For: Mr. Gerard Martin,Chief Sites Management&Permitting Section,BWSC Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office(SERO) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup(BWSC)/Sites Management Program(SMP) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville,MA 02347 On Behalf Of: Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc. P.O. Box 10-Hyannis,MA 02601 Evelyn Read, General Manager APPENDIX A: Reference Plans -Figure 1: Site Locus Plan from USGS Topographic Quad.,Hyannis-Excerpt(TOPO 1998) -Figure 2:MA DEP BWSC GIS Map,Hyannis-Excerpt(MA DEP 9/29/00) -Figure 3: Water Table Contour Map Excerpt,Town of Barnstable, 1992 - Site Plan ROS-1 - `Comprehensive Response Actions...", Prepared by BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC.,Dated March 16,2006(rev.9/4/08) APPENDIX B: Field Reports -Field Inspection Reports:#64(3/26/08)through#71 (8/15/08) -Monitor Well Sampling Log: 06/12/2008-06/13/2008 -Geologic Borehole Logs:TB-6C,TB-8C and TB-I IC -Respiration Analysis Logs: 8/15/08 -Bioventing System Operation/Monitoring Inspection Forms:#31 (4/11/08)through#35(8/15/08) -TOV Tracking Charts-Zone A,Zone B,All points -Charts:Respiration Values-SVE points Al-S,Al-D,A2-S,A2-D,B3-S,B3-D,B4-S,B4-D APPENDIX C: Environmental Records -BWSC-108:Comprehensive Response Actions Transmittal Form -BWSC-108A:Remedial Monitoring Report Transmittal Forms(3) -BWSC-108B:Remedial Monitoring Report Transmittal Forms(2) -Uniform Bill Of Lading—Granulated Activated Carbon Recycling APPENDIX D: Laboratory Analysis -Table 1:EPH analysis summary-Perimeter Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 2:VPH analysis summary-Perimeter Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 3:EPH analysis summary-Central Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 4:VPH analysis summary-Central Groundwater Monitoring Wells -Table 5:EPH analysis summary-Soil -Table 6:VPH analysis summary-Soil -Wet chemistry Tracking Charts-Perimeter wells [GZA-1,GZA-2,MW-5S/D,MW-6S(R)/D] -Groundwater Analytical Laboratory Reports: [Soil-7/22/08,Groundwater-8/22/08] APPENDIX E: Quality Assurance/Quality Control BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. LETTER OF Engineering & Environmental Services TRANSMITTAL 1573 Main Street,P.O.Box 1667 Brewster,MA 02631 (508) 896-6630 FAX (508) 896-4687 TO: DATE: JOB NUMBER: Mr. Gerard Martin 3/21/07 13002-3490 MA DEP Southeast Regional Office (SERO) 20 Riverside Drive REGARDING: Lakeville, MA 02347 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS VII & REMEDIAL Shipping Method: MONITORING STATUS REPORT Hubbard Oil Company, Inc. - RTN 4-0824 (Linked to Regular Mail ❑ Federal Express ❑ RTN#4-15370) Certified Mail ❑ UPS ❑ 33 and 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328, Parcel 125 Priority Mail ❑ Pick Up ❑ and 126], Hyannis, MA 02601 Express Mail ❑ Hand Deliver ❑ COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 3/7/07 Report entitled "Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report VI and Remedial Monitoring Status Report", Prepared by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., Dated March 7, 2007 -Comprehensive Response Action Transmittal Form, BWSC-108 (original) - Interim Remedial Monitoring Report Checklist For review and comment: ❑ For approval: ❑ As Requested: ❑ For your use:,,. - REMARKS: o cc:Hubbard Oil, Inc. - Attn: Evelyn Read, General Manager Robert A. Fasanella, Esq. - RUBIN & RUDMAN, LLP (2 copies) c - Lieutenant Hubler- Hyannis Fire Department (narrative only) _3 4� QThomas-McKean---Barnstable--Board of-Health--(narrativ_e only) John Klimm - Barnstable Town Manager(narrative only) - David Condry- Barnstable Water Company (narrative only) John Robichaud, Abutter- Robie's Refrigeration (narrative only) From: John D. Tadema-Wielandt/trl If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once BENNETT A O 'REILLY, Inc. Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line PO Box 1667Brewster,MA 02631 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Licensed Site Professional Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax B002-3490 March 7, 2007 Mr. Gerard Martin, Chief Sites Management& Permitting Section, BWSC MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION(MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office(SERO) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC)/Sites Management Program(SMP) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville,MA 02347 RE: REMEDY OPERATION STATUS VII & REMEDIAL MONITORING STATUS REPORT Hubbard Oil Company,Inc. -RTN 4-0824 (Linked to RTN#4-15370) 33 and 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328, Parcel 125 and 126] Hyannis,MA 02601 Dear Mr. Martin, On behalf of our client, Hubbard Oil, Inc., BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., has prepared this Remedy Operation Status Report for the above referenced Site, as consistent with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0893. This filing documents the remedial response actions and 1 environmental monitoring activities conducted at the Site over the past six (6) months associated l� with the operation and maintenance of an active bioventing remedial system. Environmental monitoring over the period includes microbial respiration analysis, soil and groundwater sampling and laboratory testing in review of any potential exposure to identified human and environmental receptors and as a measure of remedial performance relative to project closure objectives. An air sparging pilot study was also performed over the reporting period including the installation of a single air sparging point, to be evaluated for potential use in conjunction with the existing soil bioventing system to enhance groundwater treatment. In this period, microbial respiration rates indicate excellent biological activity and effective hydrocarbon mineralization in deep impacted soils as consistent with earlier soil testing. This soil testing did, however, identify the limitations of the bioventing system in treating the near surface soils wherein soil removal and capping remains under consideration. The environmental analysis of downgradient monitoring wells documents that all potential exposures to identified human and environmental receptors are incomplete and that no Condition of Substantial Release Migration or Imminent Hazard exists under current Site conditions wherein GW-1, GW-2 and GW-3, Method 1, Risk Characterization standards are meet at the abutters downgradient property line as intermediate to 1 MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RDJ B002-3490 PAGE 2 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT the Maher Wellfield. The most recent testing of groundwater testing of interior monitoring wells within the historic release area indicated significant improvement in water quality as to be confirmed by additional groundwater sampling prescribed in May 2007. This Remedy Operation Status (ROPS VII)document is an addendum to, and an essential part of, the public record for Site characterization, risk assessment of exposure pathways and corrective remedial efforts under Comprehensive Response Actions as a Tier IC Site. For the purposes of this report, the previous information offered is omitted as redundant and summarized only to orient the reader. For specific information on historic environmental assessment activities and remedial response actions, the reader should reference the "Phase I Limited Site Investigation" [LCR (2/20/90)], "Phase I - Initial Site Investigation with Tier Classification" [RAM (8/9/96)], "Immediate Response Action Completion Report" [SEA (8/11/00)], and the Phase II Scope of Work (9/20/02), Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Completion Statement (I1/18/02), and Phase III Identification, Evaluation and Selection of Comprehensive Response Actions (2/18/03), Phase IV Implementation of Selected Remedial Action Alternatives (6/23/03), Remedy Operation Status Report I (12/30/03), through Remedy Operation Status Report III (3/8/05), Phase IV Completion Statement and Remedy Operation Status Report IV (9/27/05) and the most recent Remedy Operation Status VI (9/7/06) documents prepared by BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC. as filed with the MA DEP (SERO). The work represented within this document, has proceeded under my supervision in a manner consistent with 309 CMR 4.02 (2), the MCP Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS), pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0191 and Quality Assurance/Quality Control policies of BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. The facts and statements herein are, to the best of our knowledge, a true and accurate representation of the current Site activities, remedial response actions and environmental conditions associated with the project. As such, this document serves as the technical justification and rationale for the LSP Opinions represented by the certifications on the Comprehensive Response Action transmittal form [BWSC-108] attached. PHASE V OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING As consistent with the Operation, Maintenance and Environmental Monitoring Plan set forth in the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan Modification, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., performed periodic Site inspections over the reporting period to monitor operations and perform maintenance on the active bio-venting treatment system in use at the subject Site. These inspections were further utilized to assess environmental conditions relative to Substantial Release Migration (SRM) and conduct prescribed soil and groundwater sampling in consideration of remedial system performance. A total of eleven (11) Site inspections were conducted at the over the past six months on 9/15/06, 10/31/06, 11/15-16/06, 12/14/06, 1/24/07, 2/2/07, 2/13/07, 2/16/07 and 2/27/07 as representing monthly Operations and Maintenance of the bioventing system and supplemental sparge system construction and pilot testing. These MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RDJ B002-3490 PAGE 3 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT inspections, and specific daily activities, are documented on field reports in Appendix B. The following is a summary of significant events over the past six months. SITE INSPECTIONS Reactive Barrier On April 13 and, 14, 2005, 1,000 lbs. of"ORC-Advanced" compound was injected into the subsurface at the downgradient property line, as well as within source areas delineated as Zone A and Zone B. Injection points were spaced approximately 15' apart at the downgradient property line and approximately 10' apart within source areas. During the sampling event on November 15 and 16, 2006, downgradient monitoring wells MW-5S/D, MW-6S(R)/D, GZA-1 and GZA-2 on the Robies Refrigeration property were sampled for remedial additive use pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0046 and as specified in the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan. No adverse impacts associated with remedial additive use have been observed as measured by magnesium, which is the primary compound of ORC. Wherein the longevity of ORC-Advanced is estimated at 12 to 24 months, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., has evaluated the effectiveness of the additive by monitoring dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations in these downgradient monitoring wells [Refer to the Environmental Monitoring section of this report]. Based on the elevated concentrations of DO reported and absence of significant dissolved-phase groundwater impact, it appears that the ORC is still active and there is currently no plan to re-apply the remedial additives at this time. Additional field-testing, groundwater sampling and analysis of interior well water quality in May 2007, will be used in the consideration of additional ORC injections. Furthermore, the air sparging pilot study will be reviewed as to the effectiveness in providing oxygen to support bioventing and in the capacity to further reduce concentrations of dissolved-phase groundwater impact within the source area monitoring wells at the Site. Bioventin sg,_ystem Regular monthly Site inspections have been conducted at the Hubbard Site by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., personnel since September 2005. Each time, the vacuum, pressure and Magnahelic gauges on the regenerative blower were checked and recorded on Bioventing System O&M Inspection Reports documented in Appendix B. Throughout the period, the operating vacuum has been measured between 8" and 16" of water depending on which SVE points were opened at the time. The moisture trap was emptied on 10/31/06 and 12/14/06 with a total of 5 gallons of remedial wastewater removed and.stored in a sealed DOT drum within the garage building at the Site. The particle filter was also checked and a photoionization detector (PID) was used to record the total organic volatile (TOV) concentrations in the influent air from each SVE point, as well as between (intermediate) the two GAC units and at the exhaust vent. BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., will continue to monitor the exhaust TOVs on a monthly basis for process control to optimize treatment performance and will arrange for the two VS-200 MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 4 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT vapor-phase carbon units to be changed out when elevated TOVs are observed from the system's exhaust port as representing Best Management Practices (BMP). Air Sparging Installation On January 24, 2007, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. personnel met Jenkins Well Drilling personnel at the Site to install an air sparging point as part of the Air Sparging Pilot Study specified in the previous ROS Status Report (9/7/06). The sparging point (AS-1) was installed approximately ten feet northwest (upgradient) of monitoring well SEA-2 and approximately ten feet southeast of bioventing points SVE B-3S and D. During the installation, thirty-five feet of 1'/4" galvanized pipe with a 1' stainless steel screen was installed ten feet below the water table to 35' bgs. To install the point, a test boring was performed to the groundwater interface; the sparging point was then driven into the vadose zone to avoid creating a preferential pathway for injected air. A two-foot bentonite seal was installed at the groundwater interface and the borehole was backfilled with natural materials to grade. The sparge point was then connected to the Gast Regenative Blower already on-site servicing the existing bioventing system at the Site. However, based on vacuum and pressure readings observed during the initial.test, it was determined that using the blower did not have the capacity to support the sparge point demand. . As such, a Ring Compressor medium pressure regenerative blower was purchased for the air sparging application and installed on February 16, 2007. This compressor assured constant delivery of oil-less pressurized air to run the sparge system pilot study and has the capacity to support additional sparge points in future applications. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING/RISK CHARACTERIZATION [APPENDIX B & D] On November 15 and 16, 2006, BENNETT& O'REMLY, INC. personnel were on-site to complete bi-annual groundwater sampling of select downgradient and source area monitoring wells in review of potential exposure pathways, as specified in the Environmental Monitoring section of the previous Remedy Operation Status report. Downgradient monitoring wells GZA- 1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW-6S(R)/D on the Robies Refrigeration property were gauged, purged and sampled for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) with target poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile petroleum hydrocarbon (VPH) with target BTEX analytes. Source area monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 were also gauged, purged and sampled for EPH and VPH carbon range only. Remedial additive testing was also performed in downgradient monitoring wells as previously noted. Perimeter Monitoring Wells Results of the November 2006 bi-annual sampling event reported concentrations of VPH C9 to C10 fractional aromatics in downgradient monitoring well MW-6S(R) marginally above MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 5 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT the method detection limit of 20 µg/L. In addition, monitoring wells MW-6S(R) and GZA-2 reported trace concentrations of naphthalene (5 µg/L and 6 µg/L, respectively) below the applicable GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1 Risk Characterization standards. Perimeter monitoring wells GZA-1, MW-5S and D, and MW-6D continued to report fractional VPH and target BTEX compounds as below the reporting limit (BRL) of analysis. In each case, the reported value or reporting limit was less than the applicable GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1-Risk Characterization standards. No concentrations of fractional EPH or target PAHs were reported above the method detection limits in any of the downgradient monitoring wells. In each case, the reporting limit was a concentration less than the applicable GW-1/GW-3, Method 1-Risk Characterization standards. Interior Monitoring Results of the November 2006 sampling event reported significant decreases in concentrations of fractional EPH in central-area monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2. Monitoring well SEA-1 reported concentrations of fractional CI I to C22 aromatics (1,600 µg/L) exceeding the GW-1 standards. However, these concentrations were 53% lower than reported in the May 2006 sampling event (3,400 µg/L). In addition, concentrations of C9 to C 18 aliphatics in SEA-1 were reported at 3,000 µg/L, below the Method 1 Risk Characterization Standard of 4,000 µg/L and 58% lower than the May 2006 sampling event (7,1000 µg/L). Monitoring well SEA-2 reported concentrations of fractional C11 to C22 aromatics (390 µg/L) marginally exceeding the GW-1 standards (200 µg/L). Similarly, these concentrations were 95% lower than previously reported during the May 2006 sampling event (7,900 µg/L). In addition, concentrations of C9 to C18 aliphatics in SEA-2 were reported at 630 µg/L, significantly below the Method 1 GW-1 Risk Characterization standard of 4,000 µg/L and 97% lower than May 2006 sampling event(23,000 µg/L). Results of the November 2006 sampling event also reported significant decreases in concentrations of fractional VPH in central-area monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2. Concentrations of VPH fractional C5 to C8 aliphatics were detected in SEA-1 (170 )Ug/L) below the GW-1 Method 1 Risk Characterization standard (400 µg/L). This concentration was seventy percent (70%) lower than concentrations detected in May of 2006 (570 µg/L). Concentrations of C9 to C10 aromatics were also detected in SEA-1 (1,700 µg/L) exceeding the GW-1 (200 µg/L) standard. This concentration was 63% lower than were detected in May 2006 (4,600 µg/L). Fractional C9 to C12 aliphatics were reported in SEA-2 at a concentration of 130 µg/L, 97% lower than concentrations detected in May 2006 (4,000 µg/L) and below the applicable GW4 Method 1 Risk Characterization Standard of 4,000 µg/L. Fractional C9 to C10 aromatics were also reported in SEA-2 at a concentration of 160 µg/L, 96% lower than concentrations reported in May 2006 (3,400 µg/L) and below the applicable GW-1 Method 1 Risk Characterization I MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RDJ B002-3490 PAGE 6 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT Standard of 200 µg/L. Although this analytical data is very encouraging as documenting the effectiveness of remedial response activities in waste site cleanup of groundwater, future groundwater sampling in May 2007, will account for any seasonal variations and qualify performance. A summary of groundwater laboratory analysis is presented in Table 3 and Table 4 located in Appendix D of this report. Soil On October 31, 2006, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., personnel conducted a series of shallow hand borings to evaluate the area and volumes of easily accessible (0-3') impacted soils and the residual petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in reconsideration of surficial soil removal as an element of the original Remedy Implementation Plan (RIP). A series of four (4) hand borings [HB-14, HB-15, HB-16 and HB-17] were conducted at the property corresponding with the area of Zone B wherein the former and existing loading racks were located [Refer to Site Plan]. An additional hand boring [HB-18] was collected in the area of Zone A at the historic location of bulk fuel oil tanks. At each of these locations, a 0-3' composite soil sample was collected for EPH, VPH and TPH"fingerprint"identification analysis. Analytical results indicate that high level residual soil impacts are present in the near surface accessible soils wherein the applicable S-1/GW-1, Method 1 — Risk Characterization standards are exceeded at all locations, the Method 2, Direct Contact standards are exceeded at three of the four locations and the Method 3, Upper Concentration Limits are exceeded at the HB-15 location. In all cases, the TPH "fingerprint" identification reported the source of such impacts as associated with old, weathered, fuel oil/home heating oil which is consistent with impacts related to the historic overfill of vehicles during the fuel transfer operations at and near the loading racks. As a result of such investigations, it was determined that the bioventing system was not adequately treating shallow soils. Although this area is fenced and locked against public access as effectively controlling dermal contact exposures as the basis delayed implementation of the full RIP, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. has reiterated our recommendation to include the excavation and re-cycling of surficial contaminated soils 0-3' [600 yards +/-] and the construction of an infiltration trench, capped with an engineered barrier, within the areas of excavation as part of the remedial strategy to meet closure objectives. Pending review, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. is prepared to proceed with soil removal, infiltration system and engineered barrier construction as a further modification of the Remedy Implementation Plan and to continue bioventing efforts under the Phase V Remedy Operation Status. Microbial Respiration Analysis Respiration analysis was performed on November 16, 2006 and February 13, 2007, in MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 7 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT order to compare baseline and post-venting conditions of bacterial respiration to current respiration rates, as well as to track such rates and reported TOV concentrations as a measure of relative treatment performance. Previous analysis of soils collected from SVE A-1 and SVE B-3 indicated sufficient indigenous bacteria with a lack of sufficient nutrients. As such, supplemental nutrient addition was made by introducing a low-strength fertilizer through the soil vapor points. Baseline respiration analysis indicated excellent biological activity with minimal methane observed in some of the more heavily impacted vapor points, as an indicator of anaerobic respiration and an oxygen-limited environment. Significant carbon dioxide accumulation was also observed. Respiration analysis conducted on November 16, 2006 indicated excellent biological activity with increased respiration rates. Compared to baseline and previously measured conditions, average methane concentrations remained low at 0.0375%, as compared to the 0.46% recorded during baseline analysis and 0.025% recorded during respiration analysis in May 2006. An average oxygen concentration of 6.9375% was established as comparable to baseline(7.86%) and previously observed concentrations (16.65%) in May 2006. Average carbon dioxide concentrations increased to 9.5% from the 9.3% established through baseline analysis and the 3.4%established in May 2006. Respiration analysis conducted on February 13, 2007 was performed with a different set of instruments than in the previous respiration analyses. A separate CO2 meter and LEL (02/CH4) meter were used. With these new instruments, no Methane was detected in any of the vapor points, Carbon Dioxide concentrations decreased to an average of 3.6% and average oxygen concentrations increased to 20.8 %. Based on the degree of variability in the February respiration results, Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. will return to using the Landtech three-gas meter during the next quarterly respiration analysis event. Regardless of the disparity in instrument readings, oxygen depletion with carbon dioxide accumulations are lines of evidence to show microbial mineralization of petroleum hydrocarbons is supported by the bioventing system. Performance of bioventing is qualified by reductions in measured TOV concentration at the exhaust manifold and by physical testing wherein petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations have decreased in soil and groundwater samples through time. Results of the respiration analyses are included for reference in Appendix B. Respiration analysis tracking charts are also provided for reference in Appendix B. REMEDIAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Soil/Bio-venting As noted, soil sampling conducted in shallow soils in Zones A and B indicated that high levels of residual soil impact are present in the near surface accessible soils and that the current bioventing remedial system is not adequately treating this shallow impact. Based upon the MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RDJ B002-3490 PAGE 8 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT client's review of this data, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. is prepared to implement the full- scale Remedy Implementation Plan consisting of the removal of surficial soils and the construction of an infiltration system and engineered barrier at the Site to eliminate the direct . contact exposures and absolve the potential leaching of contaminants within the soils to groundwater as a chronic and persistent source of groundwater impact. The next scheduled soil sampling event will be conducted in May 2007. Samples collected will be analyzed for EPH and VPH and compared to previous and historic analytical results in review of remedial performance. As previously noted, respiration analysis has been conducted on a quarterly basis over the reporting period with excellent biological activity and increased respiration rates observed. It should also be noted that simply by operating the bioventing system, petroleum hydrocarbons are being removed from impacted soils via volatilization and vapor extraction. Calculations of the amount of hydrocarbons removed from the soil were made based on the average concentration of TOV readings (75 ppm) being removed by the regenerative blower operating four (4) hours a day (2x/day for 2 hours) since September 23, 2005 (523 days) with an average flow of 51 SCFM. This information indicates that over 14 gallons of petroleum hydrocarbons have been removed over the course of the system operation as an additional benefit of the bioventing strategy. The actual reduction in hydrocarbon mass is expected to be much greater due to mineralization of contaminants by indigenous microbes in the soil, as qualified by soil testing in May 2006. Groundwater/Reactive Barrier The remedial additive ORC-Advanced was applied as a reactive barrier as well as within the source area in April 2005. Groundwater sampling of downgradient perimeter monitoring wells continues to show concentrations of EPH and VPH at or below the applicable GW-1, Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards with elevated levels of DO. Groundwater sampling of central wells SEA-1 and SEA-2, located immediately downgradient of the source areas, on the Hubbard property, continue to fluctuate. While petroleum concentrations in these monitoring wells have shown significant fluctuations throughout the year, Mann-Kendall statistical evaluations of laboratory results from 2002 through current data indicate a negative five (-5) value at SEA-1 and a negative seven (-7) value at SEA-2, representing statistically decreasing concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons at these locations [Refer to Tables 5 and 61. As such, wherein the perimeter downgradient monitoring wells continue to report fractional VPH/EPH and target analyte concentrations below the most restrictive GW-1 Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards and.increased DO concentrations continue to be observed,the reactive barrier has proven effective in mitigating any issues of Substantial Release Migration. However,prior to the most recent groundwater sampling in November 2006,the ORC-Advanced i MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 9 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT did not appear to have significantly reduced the petroleum concentrations in the source area monitoring wells. As such, BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC. proposed, constructed and currently operates the sparging Table 6: Mann-Kendall Worksheet for SEA-2 system upgradient of monitoring well SEA-1 as Date 10/02 2/5/04 11/04 5/05 11/05 5/06 11/06 Totals a pilot study to evaluate if Conc.(mg/L) 40.0 6.45 81.0 2.1 2.6 33.4 1.27 groundwater impact may 40.0 -1 +1 -1 +1 _1 _1 _2 be treated more effectively. 6.45 +1 1 -1 +1 -1 _1 The influence of the supplemental sparge 81.0 -1 -1 -1 -1 4 treatments will be further 2.1 +1 +1 -1 +1 evaluated by future soil 2.6 +1 -1 o and groundwater sampling 33.4 -1 -1 analysis in May. 2007 for determination of either full 1.27 scale sparge system -7 1 operation or additional ORC injections. Remedial Additive Monitoring During the November 2006 sampling event, the perimeter monitoring wells were sampled for wet chemistry in accordance with the provisions for remedial additive use, 310 CMR 40.0046. Wet chemistry analysis included nitrate, total nitrogen, sulfate, total iron, manganese, Table 5: Mann-Kendall Worksheet for SEA-1 magnesium and total phosphorus. Date 10/02 2/04 11/04 5105 11/05 5/06 11/06 Totals Concentrations of wet Conc.(mg/L) 6.4 26.0 23.0 12.0 39.0 11.9 5.19 chemistry parameters 6.4 +1 +i +1 +1 +1 -1 +4 observed over the reporting period have been z6.o 1 1 +1 -1 -1 -3 consistent with 23.0 -1 +1 -1 -1 -2 baselinelbackground 12.0 +1 -1 -1 -1 concentrations as 39.0 -1 -1 _2 indicating no significant degradation of water 11.9 1 -1 quality associated with 5.19 remedial treatments _5 downgradient of the treatment area. Wet chemistry tracking charts are included for reference in Appendix D. In the absence of any groundwater impacts being associated with ORC application as documented over the past 18 i i MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RDJ B002-3490 PAGE 10 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT months, future remedial additive monitoring will include only nitrate and total nitrogen as associated with periodic nutrient addition within the area of bioventing treatment. i RISK CHARACTERIZATION AND REVIEW OF SUBSTANTIAL HAZARD During the reporting period, and throughout testing conducted over the past 53 months, all concentrations of EPH and VPH and associated target analytes in downgradient monitoring wells have been consistently reported as at or below the applicable GW-1 and GW-3, Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. As such, there is no Condition of Substantial Release Migration nor any completed Critical Exposure Pathway relative to potential ingestion, inhalation or dermal contact exposures to identified human receptors or significant environmental impacts to ecological receptors as associated with groundwater impacts related to the Site. Although there may be potential impacts associated with surficial soil impacts relative to human exposures, the area of shallow soil impacts is publicly restricted, with no children present, by a gated 6' chain- link fence with No Trespass signs along the perimeter of the property which is patrolled and monitored during business operations and locked at all other times. Employees of Hubbard Oil have been advised of environmental hazards. Therefore,there is neither a condition of Imminent Hazard nor any Substantial Hazards associated with the Site under current Site Conditions as dependent on restricted access by locked fencing, signage, patrolling and monitoring of the area of release area on the subject property. FUTURE OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Bio-venting System Operation&Maintenance: Inspections of the bio-venting system will continue on a monthly basis during the completion of the sparge piloting program. At the time of inspection, the vacuum, pressure and flow gauges will be checked. The moisture trap will be emptied and remedial wastewater removed and stored in a sealed DOT drum in the secured storage building. The particle filter will also be checked and cleaned or replaced as necessary. A photoionization detector will be used to record the TOV concentrations in the influent air and intermediate to the GAC units for evidence of breakthrough. The primary GAC unit will be replaced when intermediate breakthrough is indicated. Based on the new WAVE 2 regulations, effective April 2006, Remedial Monitoring Reports will continue to be submitted to the Department concurrent with the Remedy Operation Status Reports every six-months, as required. These reports will be electronically filed after April 2007 and copies included with the future ROPS reports. Air-sparging_pilot study BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., has initiated an air sparging (AS) pilot study to target impacted groundwater at the property as a more aggressive groundwater remediation strategy, MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RDJ B002-3490 PAGE 1 I OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT wherein significant reductions in dissolved-phase petroleum concentrations have been realized at similar Sites. During the next three monthly inspections, DO measurements will be recorded and groundwater samples collected from SEA-1 and compared to historic data to qualify remedial performance of the air sparging pilot study. In addition, TOV readings will be collected at area monitoring wells and SVE points both with and without the benefit of the sparge system to qualify increase volatilization of petroleum hydrocarbons and evaluate the radius of influence for treatment to be expected for each sparge point. Environmental Monitoring Respiration analysis will continue to be performed quarterly as a measure of system performance. As respiration rates approach those of background concentrations, or on a minimum annual basis, test borings will be conducted for the qualification of soil treatment for EPH and/or VPH analysis as dependent on the known contaminant source. This information will be compared with baseline test results in review of SVE performance and closure objectives. Soil samples will also be analyzed on an annual basis for wet chemistry and bacteria counts to assure adequate nutrients to support indigenous bacteria populations and to qualify respiration rates for microbial activity. The next soil sampling event is currently scheduled for May 2007. Environmental Monitoring: Groundwater Monthly sampling of central monitoring well SEA-1 will be performed in March and April for EPH (carbon range only) to evaluate the remedial performance of the AS pilot study. Bi-annual (May/November) groundwater monitoring of the downgradient perimeter monitoring wells GZA-1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW-6S(R), D will be conducted for EPH and.VPH analysis with target analytes. The most heavily impacted central monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 will also be sampled for EPH and VPH (carbon range only) in May and November to quantify the fractional petroleum hydrocarbons in comparison to baseline analytical results. Remedial additive monitoring of nitrate and total nitrogen will also be conducted on a six month basis in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0046. On an annual basis (May), EDB and lead analysis (dissolved) will be conducted in the perimeter wells. All sampling will be accompanied by field measurements of dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity and temperature. Soil Removal with Engineered Barrier and Infiltration Syste BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. has recommended full-scale implementation of the Remedy Implementation Plan based on the soil sampling conducted in October 2006. Competitive bids were solicited for this work and the results of the analysis with the bids and specifications were sent to the client. Pending review, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. is prepared to implement the removal of some of the more heavily impacted, easily accessible (0- 3') soils at the Site as well as the construction of the engineered barrier and infiltration system MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 13 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT cc: Hubbard Oil, Inc. -Attn: Evelyn Read, General Manager Robert A. Fasanella, Esq. -RUBIN&RUDMAN, LLP (2 copies)' Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department(narrative only) Thomas McKean-Barnstable Board of Health(narrative only) John Klimm - Barnstable Town Manager(narrative only) David Condry-Barnstable Water Company(narrative only) John Robichaud,Abutter- Robie's Refrigeration(narrative only) MARCH 7,2007 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 12 OF 13 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT originally proposed in the Remedy Implementation Plan. The engineering plans and specifications will be provided at which time the work is authorized SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The findings of the Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report VII, as represented herein, set forth the rationale and technical justification for the selection of the existing bio-remediation strategy as the preferred remedial alternative. The bio-remedial strategy set forth in the Phase IV Modified Remedy Implementation Plan (March 6, 2005) has been implemented with "As Built" and Phase IV Completion Statement (September 27, 2005) provided. As such, Operation and Maintenance of the active bioventing system, piloting of supplemental sparging and the environmental monitoring activities in review of potential Critical Exposure Pathways and remedial performance in consideration of closure objectives, will continue within the Phase V Remedial Operations. Although there is No Substantial Hazard under current conditions, the consideration of supplemental sparging under the piloting program and shallow soil removal with the construction of an infiltration trench and engineered barrier are intended to expedite Site Cleanup and absolve potential Critical Exposure Pathways to meet closure objectives as either a temporary or permanent solution. The possible utilization of sparging as part of the bioventing system and/or the inclusion of soil removal and construction of an engineered barrier as part of the Comprehensive Response Actions will be addressed over the upcoming reporting period and reported in the next ROS Report in September 2007. The LSP opinions represented by this report are established by the certifications made on the attached Comprehensive Response Action [BWSC-108] Transmittal Form. The LSP opinions are based upon available data and regulations in effect at the time of this reporting. Should you have any questions or require any further information,please contact me directly. Siw.crely, ILLY,INC. C vid enne , LSP John D. dem -Wi dt Director o Envir ental Services Project Manager encl. -Report entitled"Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report VII and Remedial Monitoring Status Report", Prepared by BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC., Dated March 7, 2007 -Comprehensive Response Action Transmittal Form,BWSC-108 (original) -Interim Remedial Monitoring Report Checklist I BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. Engineering &Environmental Services LETTER OF 1573 Main Street, P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 TRANSMITTAL (508)896-6630 FAX(508) 896-4687 TO: DATE: JOB NUMBER: Mr.Gerard Martin,Chief Sites Management 3/22/05 B002-3490 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Southeast Regional Offices REGARDING: 20 Riverside Drive Hubbard Oil Company,Inc.-RTN 4-0824 Lakeville,MA 02347 33 and 51 Brooks Road[Assessors Map 328,Parcel 125 and 126] We are sending you: Hyannis,MA 02601 I COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 3/16/06 Report entitled"Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report V",Prepared by BENNETT& O'REILLY,INC.,Dated March'16,2006 -Comprehensive Response Action Transmittal Form,BWSC-108(original) t • LJ f�1 For review and comment: ❑ For approval: ❑ As requested:❑ For your use: REMARKS: Dear Mr.Martin, Please frid enclosed the above referenced document along with appropriate original BWSC Transmittal Forms. If you have any questions regarding this filing or require additional information,please contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you. cc:Hubbard Oil,Inc.-Attn:Evelyn Read,General Manager Robert A.Fasanella,Esq.-RUBIN&RUDMAN,LLP Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department(narrative only) A�_`Tho_mas McKean-.Barnstable Board of Health(narrative only) John Kliinm-Barnstable Town Manager(narrative only) David Condry-'Barnstable Water Company(narrative only) John Robichaud,Abutter-Robie's Refrigeration(narrative only) From: David C.Bennett,LSP /John Tadema-Wielandt/cmr If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once B002-3490 March 16, 2006 Mr. Gerard Martin, Chief Sites Management&Permitting Section, BWSC MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION(MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office (SERO) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC)/Sites Management Program-(SMP) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 RE: REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V Hubbard Oil Company, Inc. -RTN 4-0824 33 and 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328, Parcel 125 and 126] Hyannis,MA 02601 Dear Mr. Martin: On behalf of our client Hubbard Oil Inc. BENNETT&O'REILLY INC. has this prepared Remedy Operation Status Report V for the above referenced Site,as consistent with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0893. This filing documents the remedial response,actions and environmental monitoring activities conducted at the Site over the past six(6)months which include operation and maintenance of the active bioventing remedial system,microbial respiration analysis of bioventing performance and the groundwater sampling and laboratory testing of perimeter and interior monitoring wells in review of any potential Critical Exposure Pathways (CEP's). In this period, microbial respiration rates indicate excellent biological activity and effective hydrocarbon mineralization in impacted soils. Furthermore, the environmental analysis of downgradient monitoring wells documents that all potential CEP's are incomplete and that a condition of No Substantial Hazard is present under current Site conditions. This Remedy Operation Status V(ROPS V) document is an addendum to, and an essential part of, the public record for Site characterization, risk assessment of exposure.pathways and corrective remedial efforts under Comprehensive Response Actions as a Tier 1 C Site. For the purposes of this report, the previous information offered is omitted as redundant and summarized only to orient the reader. For specific information on historic environmental assessment activities and remedial response actions,the reader should reference the"Phase I Limited Site Investigation" [LCR (2/20/90)], "Phase I - Initial Site Investigation with Tier Classification" [RAM (8/9/96)], 1 L MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROAD/BO02-3490 PAGE 2 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V "Immediate Response Action Completion Report"[SEA(8/11/00)],and the Phase II Scope of Work (9/20/02), Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Completion Statement(11/18/02), and Phase III Identification, Evaluation and Selection of Comprehensive Response Actions (2/18/03), Phase IV Implementation of Selected Remedial Action Alternatives(6/23/03),Remedy Operation Status Report I(12/30/03),through Remedy Operation Status Report III(3/8/05)and the most recent Phase IV Completion Statement and Remedy Operation Status Report IV (9/27/05) documents prepared by BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC. as filed with the MA DEP (SERO). The work represented within this document,has proceeded under my supervision in a manner consistent with 309 CMR 4.02 (2), the MCP Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS), pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0191 and Quality Assurance/Quality Control policies of BENNETT & O'REILLY,.INC. The facts and statements herein are, to the best of our knowledge, a true and accurate representation of the current Site activities, remedial response actions and environmental conditions associated with the project. As such,this document serves as the technical justification and rationale for the LSP Opinions represented by the certifications on the Comprehensive Response Action transmittal form [BWSC-108] attached. SITE DESCRIPTION/ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING [Refer to Appendix A] Physical Conditions The subject abutting properties are located at 33.and 51 Brooks Road in Hyannis,MA under RTN#4-0824. The properties are located approximately 250 feet east of the intersection of Mary Dunn Road and Brooks Road in the Town of Hyannis,MA[Refer to Site Locus Plan-Appendix A]. The two parcels of land contain approximately 0.71 and 0.67 acres of land, respectively, with frontage along Brooks Road. The parcels are identified on the Town of Hyannis Assessors'Map 328 as Parcels 126 and 125, respectively, under common ownership by B & A Fournier Realty, Inc. Historic monitoring well sampling and analysis have identified significant groundwater impact on the eastern end of the subject property and downgradient into the railroad easement to the rear of the Robies Refrigeration property. As such, the Site, as including the eastern portion of the subject property encompasses an area 2 10'wide and extending 150'downgradient as primarily restricted to the unconfined, sandy aquifer [Refer to Site Plan-Appendix A]. The parcel identified as 33 Brooks Road(Map 328,Parcel 126)consists of a 0.71-acre parcel of land. This parcel was developed in 1929 and initially operated by Shell Oil Co.as a fuel oil depot with various aboveground/underground storage tanks and loading facilities for the wholesaling of various petroleum fuels. The parcel is developed by a two-story wood and brick framed office building, a single-story wood and concrete framed storage garage and a wood framed pumping station/loadirig rack. In 1941 the property was purchased by B.W.Atwood(Book579/Page531)and continued to be operated as a bulk fuel storage facility. Fire Department.records further indicate a release of gasoline at the Site in 1971, although no specific location nor quantity of release is reported. The property was sold to Bertrand and Alfred Fournier in 1974(Book 2116/Page 242)and continued to be used as a bulk fuel depot. It was eventually sold to the B&A Fournier Realty Trust MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROAD/BO02-3490 PAGE 3 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V in 1980(Book 3115/Page 70). It appears that the facility continued to operate as a bulk fuel facility through the mid-1990's. The underground (UST) and aboveground (AST) storage tanks were removed from the property in the period between 1992 and 1995 leaving only the 106,000-gallon aboveground storage tank(AST)in the southeast corner of the property,and the central loading rack utilized for home heating oil distribution. Sometime in the late 1990's,the facility discontinued the use of the facility for bulk fuel storage but continued to run business operations for the management of their service station properties. The parcel identified as 51 Brooks Road(Map 328,Parcel 125)consists of a 0.67-acre parcel of land. This parcel appears to also been used for bulk fuel storage of petroleum fuel. Research and record plans indicate that five(5)AST's were located in the southeast corner of the parcel adjacent to the storage facility at 31 Brooks Road. An investigation of the Hyannis Fire Department records indicates that there were five(5) 1 0,000-gallon tanks at the property. These tanks were removed in 1983.According to Evelyn Read,the General Manager of Hubbard Oil,Inc.,these tanks contained diesel fuel. In the period between 1983 and 1993,the property was used for the storage of service station equipment as part of the Fournier Petroleum interests. The 51 Brooks Road property is currently undeveloped with all petroleum marketing and fuel storage appurtenances removed by Cyn Environmental in 2000. The property is leased to New Colony Fuel Oil and is used as a parking area for fuel oil delivery trucks. Land uses in the vicinity include commercial and industrial. Abutting properties to the south formerly included two residential properties,however,that land was taken by the Town of Barnstable and is now part of the improved Mary Dunn Road roadway layout. The abutting property to the east j is used as an active railroad line owned and operated by the Old Colony Railroad Company, the Steamship Authority parking lot occupies the westerly abutting property across Brooks Road and the property to the north is vacant. Database research represented in the Phase H Scope of Work prepared by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., shows that there have been numerous releases and several active Sites in the vicinity of the Hubbard Oil Brooks Road properties. The historic testing ofupgradient groundwater monitoring wells at the subj ect Site and the Steamship Authority property to the west has reported no petroleum-related compounds at concentrations which exceed the applicable RCGW-1 and GW-1/GW-3 standards.Furthermore,no significant upgradient petroleum contaminant source appears to currently be contributing to the groundwater impact identified at the Hubbard Brooks Road Site. However, chlorinated solvents and MTBE have been detected in the upgradient Steamship Authority monitoring wells and appear to be migrating from the Barnstable Municipal Airport Property(RTN#4-0823),as unrelated to the petroleum impact at the Brooks Road properties. Access to the subject property and the railroad easement is restricted by fencing along the property lines. Such fencing restricts entry by children and the frequency and intensity of use of the land area is low. Environmental Conditions/Hydrog_eological Characteristics Review of the Geologic Map of Cape Cod&the Islands. Massachusetts, 1986, by Oldale and Barlow,indicates the subject area is underlain by Barnstable Plain Deposits,typified by mostly gravelly sand and pebble to cobble gravel and locally includes boulders. The Site is characterized MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADBO02-3490 PAGE 4 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V i by the Soil Survey of Barnstable County,Massachusetts, 1-993,as CcA-Carver loamy coarse sand, typified by very deep, nearly level, excessively drained soils generally in broad areas on outwash plains but also in areas of sandy glacial lake deposits. These glacial outwash sands typically display hydraulic conductivities between 50-200ft/day with an associated groundwater flow velocity between 100-200 ft/year. Slug testing conducted by SEA in June of 2000 indicates an average hydraulic conductivity of 28.2 ft/day and a groundwater velocity of approximately 120 ft/year at the Site. Based on historic groundwater testing, dissolved petroleum contamination appears to be limited primarily to the upper 20'portion of the shallow unconfined, sandy aquifer. Review of regional groundwater contours indicate a southeasterly groundwater flow direction toward Lewis Bay,some 3/4 mile southeast(Refer'to Figure 3). Site-specific groundwater flow has been determined to be in a generally easterly direction with the groundwater contact between 26 and 30' below grade surface (bgs). The aquifer underlying the Site is unconfined with an estimated thickness of more than 50'based on regional cross-sections developed in association with the Unit 3 Barnstable Aquifer Protection Project. According to the MA DEP BWSC 2 1 E GIS overlay map, both parcels appear to be fully within a designated Non-Potential Drinking Water Source Area (NPDWSA)apparently based on the density of development,and industrial and transportation uses in the area. However,-both parcels and the surrounding area are also depicted as within the DEP Approved Wellhead Protection Area(Zone II)of the Maher Wellfield,containing three public water supply wells (PWS) located approximately 1,000' southeast of the Site with a capacity of three million gallons per day. As such, issues of the Zone II Approved Wellhead Protection Area take precedence over the NPDWSA designation based on current density and use as constituting a Potential Drinking Water Source Area. Based on the Site specific physical and environmental setting, the GW-1 and GW-3 groundwater standards, and the S-2 and S-3 soil standards are applicable to Method 1 - Risk Characterization under the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0900. Such criteria is considered in review of"Significant Risk" in the determination of potential ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact exposures and significant environmental impacts. Disposal Site Map Three specific areas of contaminant impact were identified during the Phase II Investigation previously conducted. Soil borings at the Brooks Road properties were conducted to establish the presence and extent and magnitude of significant soil contamination within the vadose zone, in locations corresponding with former and current bulk fuel storage, fuel transfer, and areas of the property which had not previously been thoroughly investigated. Such testing at the 51 Brooks Road location showed that soil impact was present in the southeast corner of the property[Zone A] as corresponding to the former 5-10,000 gallon AST's(diesel). Soil contamination extended from 3-8' in the northern portion (TB-4) of Zone A and from 3-27', the groundwater interface, in the central portion (TB-11) of Zone A. Confirmatory laboratory analysis of soil samples reported fractional EPH compounds and TPH concentrations exceeding the applicable S-2 and S-3/GW-1 standards.As such,Zone A was defined as diesel related soil impact within a 65 (L)x 50' (W)area i MARCH 11,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADBO02-3490 PAGE 5 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V as defined by TB-4 to the north,TB-12 to the west,SEA-2 to the east and based on lateral dispersion extends south onto the 33 Brooks Road property approximately 23'. I Analytical results of soil samples from previous investigations had reported elevated field PID readings and levels of EPH and VPH exceeding the S-3/GW-1/GW-3 Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards in the east-central area(SEA-1 and SEA-SB-3) of the 33 Brooks Road property as corresponding to the former aboveground bulk fuel storage of gasoline and kerosene [Zone B]. Phase lI activities conducted in this area reported significant soil impact from 13-28' below grade in the TB-6 location as south of the previous test borings.This area is defined by TB-5 to the north, SEA-SB-2 and TB-8 to the west,and SEA-SB-4 and TB-7 to the south. Confirmatory Laboratory analysis indicated that concentrations of the C9 to C 10 aromatic compounds as well as naphthalene exceeded the applicable S-3/GW-1 Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards at this location below 15'to the groundwater interface. As such, Zone B was defined as gasoline/kerosene' and co-mingled diesel fuel soil contamination within a 65'(L)x 45'(W)area,corresponding to the former dispenser locations on the 33 Brooks Road property. The Zone B delineation further corresponds with the area of an aboveground kerosene tank reported as having leaked in the 1974 appraiser's report conducted as part of the B. W.Atwood to Bertrand and Alfred Fournier property transfer(Book 2116/Page 242).It is believed that this reference and the 1971 release reported by the Hyannis Fire Department are one in the same. Earlier investigations had shown several areas of soil staining on the property as a result of bulk fuel transfer operations. Such an area of staining was identified during the Phase H Investigation at the base of the 106,000-gallon AST located at the southeastern portion of the 33 Brooks Road property where control valves are located for the piping to the existing loading rack [Zone C]. Hand boring HB-1:0-5' reported elevated PID response as corresponding to surficial staining in the area. As such, Zone C was defined by diesel/#2 fuel oil impact within an approximated 15' (L)x 15' (W)-area. Based on previous testing of on-site monitoring wells during the Phase II Investigation as compared to the GW-1/GW-3 criteria,an area of significant groundwater impact appears to extend from the area of monitoring wells SEA-2, SEA-1,MW-4 and MW-1 on the eastern portions of the Hubbard properties, southeasterly into the railroad easement (N/F Old Colony Railroad), as consistent with regional and Site-specific groundwater flow. The downgradient lateral,vertical and longitudinal extent of groundwater impact represented in the Phase H Completion statement was defined by monitoring wells (RR)GZA-2, (RR)GZA-3, (RR)MW-6S/D and (RR)MW-5S/D, wherein no significant concentrations of VPH/EPH,BTEX,PAH's,EDB or metals corresponding to source contaminants identified on 51 and 33 Brooks Road were detected. Sensitive Receptors/Exposure Routes Exposure potential was evaluated per the applicable Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. A review of potential ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation hazards relative to the frequency and intensity of Site use was conducted. Site workers and commercial tenants were identified as the potential human receptors. The presence of children was considered, as a MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROAD/BO02-3490 PAGE 6 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V conservative measure, with low frequency and low intensity of use for determination of soil standards within the fenced-in property. As such,the S-3 soil category is applicable to potentially accessible soils from 3-15'below grade in unpaved areas and from 0-15'in paved areas, as well as to isolated soils greater than 15'below grade or soils underlying buildings or permanent structures. Based on the depth of noted soil contamination below T,no ingestion,inhalation or dermal contact exposures to humans and/or environmental receptors have been identified. Wherein the area of identified soil impact is unpaved, the leaching of contaminants to groundwater is an overriding consideration of these Comprehensive Response Actions and is the sole potential Critical Exposure Pathway(CEP) at this time. In review of groundwater exposure,wherein the Site is within the boundaries of Zone H for several public water supply(PWS)wells, the GW-1 ingestion standards are applicable. Based on a depth to groundwater at greater than 15'below grade,the GW-2 inhalation standards are excluded. The GW-3 Method 1 -Risk Characterization standard for environmental risk is also applicable to groundwater beneath the site and potential dermal contact. The Maher well field which contains three public water supply wells is also located approximately 800' east-southeast of the Site in a downgradient location. Based on the mapped vertical and lateral extent of groundwater impact,no Condition of Substantial Release Migration (SRM), ingestion, inhalation or dermal contact exposures to humans and/or environmental receptors have been identified and no Critical Exposure Pathways are apparent at this time. DISPOSAL SITE REGULATORY COMPLIANCE HISTORY In November 1989, B & A Realty, Inc., was originally issued a Notice of Responsibility (NOR) by the MA DEP in response to volatile organic compound (VOC) impact within the three municipal water supply wells of the Maher Wellfield being investigated by the Town of Barnstable in the "Unit 3 Investigation" for wellhead protection. This Unit 3 study included commercial/indust W use properties surrounding the Maher Wellfield. Hubbard Oil Company,Inc. retained the services of LCR,LLP.to conduct a"Phase I Limited Site Investigation"at the 33 Brooks Road property. During the site reconnaissance by LCR, several petroleum storage tanks, both aboveground (ASTs) and underground (USTs) were observed on the Site, as well as several areas of soil staining. In December 1989 and January 1990,LCR conducted test borings and monitoring well installations with soil and groundwater sampling along the easterly property line. No significant soil contamination was noted from field photoionization screening except at the groundwater interface at MW-1,located immediately downgradient of the existing 106,000-gallon aboveground storage tank storing #2 fuel oil. Groundwater gauging of Site and surrounding monitoring wells established a Site-specific northeasterly groundwater flow direction. Results of groundwater sampling conducted at the on-Site monitoring wells indicated trace levels of benzene in the MW-2 monitoring well location,generally downgradient of the truck loading rack. No VOCs were detected in the sample from MW-1 with all concentrations reported below the promulgated drinking water standards at the time. The findings of the LCR investigation were that the subject Hubbard property was potentially contributing to the hydrocarbon-related groundwater impact identified at the Robie's Refrigeration property, and to a lesser potential degree to impact at monitoring wells at the Maher Wellfield. MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD O]L CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROAD/BO02-3490 PAGE 7 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V On October 31, 1993,under the revisions to the MA Contingency Plan(MCP),the Hubbard Oil property was transitioned as a"Location to be Investigated". In accordance with the new MCP regulations for such Transitioned Sites,a Phase I Initial Site Investigation was conducted in August 1.996 by RAM Environmental,LLC. (RAM)to qualify and update environmental conditions at the property and review remedial response liability as associated with human and/or environmental exposure risks. The Phase I Initial Site Investigation Report was used as the basis of the Tier Classification for the 33 Brooks Road property as a Tier 1 C Site based on the discovery of significant soil and groundwater impact within the Zone H of the Barnstable Water Department Maher Wellfield, indicating a potential Critical Exposure Pathway associated with the potential ingestion of contaminants in drinking water. Because petroleum related soil contamination was suspected of leaching into the groundwater,RAM recommended an Immediate Response Action(IRA)to address soil and groundwater impact at the property as a 72-hour Release Notification condition pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0313. In the period between 1992 and 1995,the fuel storage tanks on the 51 Brooks Road property were removed and remedial response activities appear to have been limited to environmental assessment only. On December 30, 1999 the Department issued a Notice of Noncompliance (NON) to Hubbard identifying the Tier I Permit Application as administratively incomplete. On February 22, 2000 SEA Consultants,Inc. (SEA)were retained and re-submitted a Tier IC Permit Application to the DEP on behalf of Hubbard. As part of the DEP's Permit Review process,a site inspection was conducted at the 33 Brooks Road property and the 51 Brooks Road property on March 20, 2000. Seven 55-gallon drums containing various amounts of unknown liquids and solids were observed in poor condition at the properties, as well as several empty, rusted fuel storage tanks. On March 30,2000,the Department issued another NON to Hubbard for the facility at 33 Brooks Road(RTN 4-0824). The DEP requested that an IRA Plan be submitted to evaluate current Site soil and groundwater quality. The DEP also assigned RTN 4-15370 for the Threat of Release at the 51 Brooks Road property as based on the identification of rusted tanks and drums. Hubbard subsequently requested approval to link the two RTNs and a Minor Permit Modification to the existing Tier IC permit was submitted to the DEP along with the IRA Plan on April 13, 2000. The IRA Plan specified removal of the potential sources of release including tanks, drums and service station related appurtenances at the 51 Brooks Road property, research of previous environmental assessment activities conducted at the property and at the downgradient properties, the testing of soil and groundwater conditions at both Hubbard parcels and downgradient properties, and the removal of up to ten yards of impacted surface soils. An environmental contractor was hired by Hubbard to remove all existing debris at the 51 Brooks Road property and on April 27,2000 Cyn Environmental Services removed ten drums of oil and oily solids from the property under a Hazardous Waste Manifest. Hyannis Fire Department records further indicate that eight(8)abandoned ASTs stored on the 51 Brooks Road property were removed in April 2000 as part of the general housekeeping cleanup of the property recommended by SEA. i MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADBO02-3490 PAGE 8 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V Soil and groundwater assessment activities included eight test borings(SB-1 through SB-5) with three completed as groundwater monitoring wells(SEA-1 through SEA-3). Concentrations of EPH,VPH,2-Methyl naphthalene and naphthalene were detected above applicable MCP standards at the SEA-1 (23-25')and SEA-3(12-14')locations. SEA-1 was located on the easterly property line on the railroad spur between MW-1 and MW-2 immediately down gradient of former underground/aboveground fuel storage at 33 Brooks Road and SEA-3 was located in the northeast corner of the 55 Brooks Road property.No other significant petroleum contamination was noted in the soil testing conducted. . On June 14,2000, SEA sampled the six(6)on-Site monitoring well and two(2)upgradient wells at the Barnstable Airport property across Brooks Road,as leased to the Steamship Authority. Fractional VPH/EPH compounds and several target analytes were detected above the RCGW-1 and GW-1 standards in the SEA-1 (located down gradient of the former bulk storage and loading racks), SEA-2 (located south of the former diesel ASTs at 51 Brooks Road) and MW-1 (located down gradient of the large existing fuel oil AST at 33 Brooks Road) monitoring wells. The gasoline additive EDB was reported at a concentration above the applicable MCP standards at the SEA-1 monitoring well only. As part of the IRA,SEA further substantiated an easterly groundwater flow direction toward the Maher Wellfield. At the time of testing,the Site-specific groundwater flow direction was in an east-southeasterly direction. Slug testing was used to measure hydraulic conductivity and combined with hydraulic gradient and an assumed porosity, a groundwater flow velocity of 120 ft/year was computed. It was the finding of such investigation that no Imminent Hazard Condition existed but that groundwater quality at the downgradient property line did exceed the promulgated GW-1 drinking water standards as a result of leaching of impacted soils in the area of the existing and former bulk storage of petroleum products at 33 Brooks Road and from the former bulk storage of petroleum products at 51 Brooks Road. Additional soil testing was recommended to define the extent of both soil and groundwater impact in the development of an effective remedial strategy. On. the filing of the Immediate Response Action Completion Report(8/11/00), SEA provided an LSP Notice Termination with the withdrawal of William Mallio as LSP of Record. On June 5,2002,the MA DEP issued allotice ofNon-Compliance to Hubbard Oil for failure to meet the Comprehensive Response Actions statutory deadline for the submittal of the Phase II and Phase III Investigations due on April 4,2002. Subsequently,a meeting was held with the MA DEP to enter into an Administrative Consent Order to established time frames for performance and to take corrective measures and submit the Phase II,Phase III and Phase IV reports required under the MCP. An Administrative Consent Order was subsequently entered into between Hubbard Oil and the MA DEP. BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., was retained to provide professional environmental consulting services and LSP oversight. A Phase II - Scope of Work dated September 23, 2002 was prepared by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., and filed with the MA DEP. The Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment investigation was initiated to establish survey control for vertical and horizontal locations of existing MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADB002-3490 PAGE 9 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V site features and monitoring wells, identify and investigate the source(s) of known soil and groundwater contamination,establish the nature and extent of such impact and to evaluate exposure pathways and risk to identified receptors. A total of twelve (12) test borings,with one monitoring well, were conducted at the subject properties as part of the investigation for hydrogeologic characterization of subsurface conditions, specifically in the northern and eastern portions of 51 Brooks Road(Lot 125), as well as the area of the former ASTs in the southeastern portion of that property. At 33 Brooks Road(Lot 126),the areas of testing included areas of current and former fuel storage in the southeastern portion of the property as well as a leaching catch basin in the central portion of the property. Based on such soils sampling,an additional shallow monitoring well(MW- 4)was set on the 31 Brooks Road property at the TB-6 location,immediately down gradient of the existing loading rack, wherein gross soil impact was noted below 15'to the groundwater interface. Monitoring well MW-4 was set in the area of the former underground storage tanks between MW-1 and SEA-1. Subsequent to negotiation of an Access Agreement with the Robichaud's as owner of the property at 279 Yarmouth Road (Robie's), two monitoring well couplets were installed on the downgradient Robie's Refrigeration property as proposed in the Phase H Scope of Work. The positioning of these monitoring wells was based on site specific groundwater flow determination as being clearly in a down gradient position to define the lateral, longitudinal and vertical extent of dissolved phase groundwater impact intermediate to the Maher Wellfield. The shallow wells were set across the groundwater interface with the deep wells set with 30'of penetrations within the upper aquifer as intermediate to the production horizon of the Maher Well Field production wells and the Hubbard Site. i The Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment established a Site model as the basis of the Phase III Investigation for the Review and Selection of a Remedial Alternative as prepared and filed with the MA DEP dated February 18,2003. In the evaluation of remedial alternatives suited to the specific environmental conditions and physical limitations ofthe Site,proposals were solicited from various companies that specialize in remediation technology for the treatment of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater. An initial screening of technologies including: bioventing, excavation, chemical oxidation, butane biostimulation and thermal desorption were identified as appropriate for the treatment of vadose zone soil impact and dissolved phase groundwater impact as being able to attain a Permanent Solution in support of a Class A, Response Action Outcome. Based on such review,a bioremedial strategy was developed and presented that included the removal of near surface contaminated soils,the use of the remedial additive ORC for groundwater treatment, bioventing for soil treatment and use of an engineered barrier. This Remedial Action Plan was to be subject to pilot testing to qualify microbial respiration rates to support the mineralization of petroleum hydrocarbons. On April 16,2003,BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. supervised the installation of eight soil vapor points,constructed of two inch,schedule 40 PVC with#20 slot screen. The vapor points were installed as four well couplets,consisting of a shallow point,screened from-5 to-10'bgs,and a deep MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADBO02-3490 PAGE 10 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V point, screened from-13 to-23'bgs. Two couplets(A-1, A-2 S/D)were installed in Zone A where fuel oil/diesel fuel impact had been identified. Two well couplets(B-3,B-4 S/D)were installed in Zone B where gasoline impact had been identified. Soil samples were collected from points SVE A-1 and SVE B-3 and were submitted to Micro-Bac International, Inc. for TPH degraders plate counts, nutrient analysis package and treatability testing. Results of soils collected from SVE A-1 and SVE B-3 indicated sufficient indigenous bacteria with concentrations of 4.01 x 10'from SVE A-1 and 3.57 x 106 in SVE B-3. However,the analyses reported insufficient nutrients at both points. Both samples also responded well to treatability analysis with ratings of"good"or"very good"when inoculated with Micro-Bac M-1000H* and OSNF#l. As such, nutrients appeared to be a limiting factor to microbial counts and activity. Respiration analysis was performed on June 10, 2003,prior to the pilot study,to determine baseline conditions of bacterial respiration prior to the Bio-venting pilot testing. Previous analysis of soils collected from SVE A-1 and SVE B-3 indicated sufficient indigenous bacteria but with a lack of sufficient nutrients. Respiration analysis of baseline conditions indicated excellent biological activity with minimal methane and significant carbon dioxide accumulation. Minimal amounts of methane were observed in some of the more heavily impacted vapor points. The presence of methane is an indicator of anaerobic respiration and suggests an oxygen-limited environment. Respiration analysis was conducted again on June 13, 2003, after the bio-venting pilot study to determine the effects of ventilation on biological activity. Again, respiration analysis of post- ventilation conditions indicated excellent biological activity and increased respiration rates. This pilot testing estimated petroleum hydrocarbon removal rates up to 24 gallons/day at 40 CFM for SVE-A1D and up to 8 gallons/day at 40 CFM for SVE-B31). The pilot testing information was incorporated into the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan(RIP) filed with the MA DEP dated June 23,2003. This report presented information on soil treatability analysis,the bio-venting piloting study and ORC injection computations to further qualify the configuration, equipment specifications, operation and maintenance and environmental monitoring requirements for the elected bioremediation alternative. The Remedy Implementation Plan specified 1)the injection of Regenesis Oxygen Release Compound(ORC)to form an oxygen barrier at the downgradient property line, 2)the removal and recycling of near surface contaminated soils,with the construction of an engineered barrier to reduce infiltration of storm water,3)and the installation and connection of soil.vapor points to a regenerative blower with an infiltration trench for nutrient and moisture control. Following such submittal,the Town of Barnstable announce an intent to acquire the property as part of the Barnstable Airport expansion. Subsequently,BENNETT& O'REILLY,INC. as the agent for Hubbard Oil, had meetings with the Town's Consultant to review Site cleanup and to acquire development plans to coordinate remedial response efforts with the intended taking and future property development. In leu of full implementation of the RIP,the bioventing system was equipped with wind turbine vents for passive operation during negotiations over the imminent domain taking wherein no definitive plans were presented for the Site and there was disagreement on fair market value of the property relative to environmental concerns. The full scale MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADB002-3490 PAGE 11 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V implementation of the RIP bioremediation strategy was delayed until the Spring of 2005 pending response from the Town of Barnstable to substantive practical and financial issues regarding the previously announced taking of the property and proposed use of the property as a roadway and parking lot. Phase V Remedy Operation Status(ROS)reports were prepared on a six month basis in the period between December 2003 to March 2005. The Town of Barnstable then announced in a written statement that they were withdrawing from negotiations for immanent domain taking of the property, abandoning plans for Airport Expansion in this area. In March 2005,the ROS report presented a modification of the Phase IV RIP excluding soil removal and construction of the engineered barrier in leu of environmental monitoring of system performance to treat surficial soils. In September 2005,the Phase IV Completion statement with the"as built"construction plans for the full scale active bioventing system and installation of the ORC reactive barrier was presented in the ROS 4 report filed with the MA DEP. The following section presents the ROS activities over the past six months of active system operation, maintenance and environmental monitoring. PHASE V OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING As consistent with the Operation,Maintenance and Environmental Monitoring Plan set forth in the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan Modification, BENNETT & O'REMLY, INC., performed periodic Site inspections over the reporting period to monitor operations and perform maintenance on the active bio-venting treatment system in use at the subject Site. These inspections were further utilized to assess environmental conditions relative to SRM and conduct prescribed soil and groundwater sampling. A total of eight Site inspections were conducted at the subject Site over the past six months on 9/15/05, 9/23/05, 11/9/05 and 11110105, 12/30/053 1/27/06, 2/7/06, and 3/2/06. These inspections,and specific daily activities,are documented on field reports in Appendix B. The following is a summary of significant events over the past six months. SITE INSPECTIONS Reactive Barrier On April 13 and 14, 2005, 1,000 lbs. of ORC-Advanced were injected into the subsurface at the downgradient property line, as well as within source areas Zone A and Zone B. Injection points were spaced approximately 15'apart at the downgradient property line and approximately 10' apart within source areas. During the groundwater sampling events on September 9 and 10, 2005 downgradient monitoring wells MW-5 S/D, MW-6D, GZA-1 and GZA-2 on the Robies Refrigeration property were sampled for remedial additive use pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0046 and as specified in the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan. Wherein the longevity of ORC- Advanced is estimated at 12 to 24 months, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. is evaluating the effectiveness of the additive by monitoring dissolved oxygen (DO) levels in these downgradient monitoring wells [Refer to the Environmental Monitoring section of this report]. There are no operation or maintenance requirements for the reactive barrier. The need to re-apply the ORC- Advanced will be reviewed following the May 2006 sampling event. MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADB002-3490 PAGE 12 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V Bioventin sg`vstem Regular monthly Site inspections have been conducted at the Hubbard Site by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., personnel since September 2005. Each time, the vacuum, pressure and Magnaehelic gauges on the regenerative blower were checked and recorded on Bioventing System O&M Inspection Reports documented in Appendix B. Throughout the period,the operating vacuum has been measured between 8 and 18" of water depending on which SVE points were opened at the time. The moisture trap was emptied on 11/9/05 and 1/27/06 with a total of 10 gallons of remedial wastewater removed and stored in a sealed DOT drum within the garage building at the Site. No impacted groundwater was transported off-Site during the reporting period. The particle filter was also checked and a photoionization detector (PID) was used to record the total organic volatile (TOV)concentrations in the influent air from each SVE point,as well as between(intermediate)the two GAC units and at the exhaust vent. During the most recent inspection, the intermediate and exhaust TOV readings were noted to be elevated. As such,the two VS-200 vapor-phase carbon units are scheduled to be changed out. The spent carbon will be recycled by thermal reactivation with the Bill of Lading and recycling certificates provided in the next ROS report. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING/RISK CHARACTERIZATION [APPENDIX B & D] Perimeter Monitoring_Wells On November 9 and 10, 2005, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. personnel were on-site to complete bi-annual groundwater sampling of select downgradient and source area monitoring wells in review of CEPs, as specified in the Environmental Monitoring section of the previous Phase IV Completion/ROS-4 report. Downgradient monitoring wells GZA-1,GZA-2,MW-5 S/D and MW-6 D on the Robies Refrigeration property were gauged, developed and sampled for EPH with target four poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and VPH with target BTEX analytes. Monitoring well MW-6S on the Robies Refrigeration property was noted as destroyed with the installation of a new septic system at the property and was subsequently reinstalled on January 27, 2006 as replacement well MW-6S(R). Source area monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 on the Hubbard properties were sampled for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). Results of the November 2005 bi-annual sampling event reported concentrations of VPH C9 to C 10 fractional aromatics in downgradient wells GZA-2 and MW-6S marginally above the method detection limit of 20 µg/L. Perimeter monitoring wells MW-5S and D, and MW-6 D reported fractional VPH compounds as below the reporting limit (BRL) of the analysis. In each case, the reported value or reporting limit was a concentration less than the applicable GW-1/GW-3,Method 1-Risk Characterization standards. Concentrations of fractional EPH compounds were reported as BRL in all downgradient monitoring wells. In each case,the reported value or reporting limit was a concentration less than the applicable GW-1/GW-3,Method 1-Risk Characterization standards. MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADB002-3490 PAGE 13 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V Table 1: Method 1 -Risk Characterization Standards EPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-PERIMETER GROUNDWATER Monitoring EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH 4amw—m' W3� Well RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS 'Standard .Standard Location (µPS--PPb) (µPS--PPb) (µFA PPb) (µPS PPb) (lid--PPb) (µPS-PPb) (µgfL-PPb) b, [4/24/03] [6/3/03] [10/9/03] [2/5/04]* [11/10/04]* [5/26/05] [1119105- n 310 C3MR u3105CMR� 11/10/05] #40 9„�74(2) GZA-1(D) T t �N 0 C9 to C18 � NOT NOT BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 4 000.� 20fQ0�0,z C19 to C36 TESTED TESTED BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) r 5000} 20 000 ; Cl l to C22 BRL(<160) 160 200 BRL(<200) BRL(<150) fi 2gOr 22 30?000 4-Target PAR. NT naphthalene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 2-methylnaphthalene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 1'0 G 000 acenaphthene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 20a 5 Sr000 phenanthrene 0.8 2.2 BRL <5 B EDB/DBCP ( ) BRL( )<5 NT NT BRL(<0.02) NT Lead• NT NT BRL(<5) NT 4 s 13!7f T C9 to C18 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) .�4000h00�j�5;20 -000- -.= C19 to C36 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) .BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 5,0 0 l 0 000� C11 to C22 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<150) BRL(<200) BRL(<150) 200 E"N30 000 t 4 Target PAH BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<0.5) ` S 7 naphthalene BRL(<0.5) 0.8 BRL(<5) BRL(<5) �6 000 2-methylnaphthalene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) �}0�` 3 00 acenaphthene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 03 phenanthrene P 0.9 BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) EDB/DBCP NT NT BRL(<0.02) NT U 02 � S�OOOp Lead NT NT BRL <5 NT GZA-3(S) r��r Y rt C9Ito C18 NOT NOT BRL(<500) NOT NOT NOT NOT ,54 g00� ti�20 000 ea— —z C19 to C36 TESTED TESTED BRL(<500) TESTED TESTED TESTED TESTED �5 000 �� q20 000 Cl 1 to C22 BRL(<160) NA a "200a s `�' 4 Target PAH NT ,[4PAIm�4PAH>50 MW-5S c C9 to C18 BRL(.<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 4 000 '�' 200 ME C19 to C36 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) "tl'-5 000 r Cl1 to C22 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<150) BRL(<200) BRL(<150) �00 4 Target PAH BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) i;4PA�IR,I--`i°0's PAH SOi EDB/DBCP NT NT BRL(<0.02) NT :x7,WRQDM-it Lead NT NT BRL(<5) NT MW-513 C9 to C18 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<530) 4,000 --R20 000�$ aM C19 to C36 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<530) 5 QOOe 20 OOOt C11 to C22 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) .BRL(<160) BRL(<150) BRL(<200) BRL(<160) Ya-' 200 A�-ha— 4 Target PAH BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) YY9. f naphthalene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 20 x�€6 000x# 2-methylnaphthalene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) acenaphthene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) �205000 phenanthrene - 0.6 BRL(<g) BRL(<5) EDB/DBCP NT NT BRL(<0.02) NT Y0 O ' 50j00Q Lead NT NT BRL(<5) NT .15 30; r MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROAD/B002-3490 PAGE 14 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V MW-6S C9 to C18 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 4 000' ,20 000 C19 to C36 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 5000, 20 000 a DESTROYED CI 1 to C22 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<150) BRL(<200)<0 AND 200-,, =30000 'x; 4 Target PAH BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL .5 'f`` ( ) REPLACED naphthalene 2.1 BRL(<0.5) 2.2 BRL(<5) WITH t t 206`000 2-methylnaphthalene 1.2 BRL(<0.5) 0.8 BRL(<5) lvfW-6S(R) 10 + : 3 000 acena hthene BRL <0.5 BRL <0.5 BRL <5 .l :; ,0 0 ,f. p ( ) ( ) BRL(<5 ,�r20 <�5 000 r phenanthrene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<O.5) BRL(<5) 3 300 (Z 50 1 EDB/DBCP NT NT BRL(<0.02) Lead NT NT BRL(<5) ='30 MW-6D C9 to C18 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 4,000 i 1`-20 000 C19 to C36 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 5r000 K,20 000E:a CI to C22 190 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<150) BRL(<200) BRL(<150) r_ �200 Y.+, F30,OOOu; 4 PAH BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) (4PAH>10 P_AH4>50 EDB/DBCP NT NT BRL(<0.02) NT 0.02 -'50,000 u-j Lead NT NT BRL(<5) NT Bold text indicates results that exceed applicable groundwater category(s) Shaded areas designates appropriate groundwater category(s) Heavy PAHs detected in samples collected on 2/5/04 and 11/10/04 were determined to be unrelated to the release on the Hubbard Oil Site and have been removed from this Table. Table 2: Method 1 -Risk Characterization Standards VPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-PERIMETER GROUNDWATER Monitoring VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH GW�1 Gw 3C Well RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS Standard `� /Standard; Location (µg/L-ppb) (µg/L-ppb) (µFA-ppb) (µg/L-ppb) (µme-ppb) (µgIL-ppb) (pg/L-ppb) ;pb) @P b),i [4/24/03] [6/3/03] [10/9/03] [2/5/04] (11/10/04] [5/26/05] [11/9/05- 310xCMR t 310 CMR 11110105] L'40.974(2j r40 974 2)` GZA-1(D) CS to C8 NOT NOT BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 400 '400 al C9 to C12 TESTED TESTED BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) '4,006' 20,000 J C66 BtTEX CIO BRL BRL(5)) BRL(<S) BRL( 5/25) BRL(5) 37 V':j00 K >400Q0 N MTBE BRL(<5) _�0� k '.„*5 000 Toluenne e BRL(<I) S + ; �7 Qpw" , BRL(<5) 50,000 Ethylbenzene 7 ;7�00 4,000'>r Xylene 16 10,000, 50,000 Naphthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<25) 7 BRL(<5) 20 :6,000 EDB NT NT NT BRL(<0.20) NT 02 ..5,Q000 LEAD NT NT NT BRL(<5) NT 15 3 -30w_' GZA-2(S) - cs to c8 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) . 400;_�; ',a,000; C9 to C12 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(Qo) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 4 000x-A 20 000 ` 5 is C9 to C10 25 34 BRL(<20) 20 24 32 34 1,200, r *4 000` Xylene BRL(<5) 11 BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 12 17 10 000 ." •.;50 fl00 Ethylbenzene 6 10 BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 6 7 700 4,000 Other Target BTEX BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) i>4 000 t.k Naphthalene BRL(<5) 6 BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 6 BRL(<5) BRL(<5) ]6,000, EDB NT NT NT NT NT BRL(<0.02) NT .`02 50 000 LEAD NT NT BRL(<6) NT NT BRL(<S) NT ' "15R GZA-3(S) C5 to C8 NOT NOT BRL(<20) NOT NOT NOT NOT 400�+ 4 000'- C9 to C12 TESTED TESTED BRL(<20) TESTED TESTED TESTED TESTED 4,000�*jj 1-',-20'Q00, C9toCIO BRL(<20) Ir000—11 ry BTEX/Naphthalene BRL(<5) >5 `->4 000 EDB NT 02"' t i50,0o0?,4 LEAD NT 30y F_ MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROAD/BO02-3490 PAGE 15 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V Uffi CS to C8 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 400' s'_ �4 000+' C9 to C12 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 000 C9 to CIO BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 41 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 200' t K_�-%'4 000'-�, BTEX/Naphthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) >f5 ii ^ >4 OQO EDB NT NT NT NT NT BRL <0.02) NT 3 v LEAD BRL(<5) NT 8 NT NT BRL(<5) NT MW_5D C5 to C8 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) j 4r00 4 000'— C9 to C12 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 0001 > 20 000 C9 to CIO BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BTEX/Napbthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5/25) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) EDB NT NT NT NT NT BRL(<0.02) NT LEAD NT NT BRL(<6) NT NT BRL(<5) NT w ?35 7.�: -jQ;;:• MW-6S y r r C5 to C8 24 BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) DESTROYED 400" ' 4 000 C9 to C12 20 BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) --t;A 0007NI �20 000?E C9 to CIO .150 BRL(<20) 130 BRL(<20) 82 21 .20Q 4,0QO tr r aL Xylene 5 BRL(<5) 71 BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) Ethylbenzene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 13 BRL(<5) 700^ ,t' y, 4 000 ,3 Other BTEX BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5/25) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) >5p,,. � �;4,Oq r Naphthalene 11 BRL(<5) BRL(<LS) BRL(<5) 13 BRL(<5) EDB NT NT NT NT NT BRL(<0.02) 3 02 y L :'V50 0001U',: LEAD NT NT BRL(<6) NT NT BRL(<5) ,w.30 MW-6D C5 to C8 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 400 000 C9 to C12 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) V000 C9 to CIO BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BTEX/Naphthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) EDB NT NT NT NT NT BRL(<0.02) NT 02 50 000 LEAD NT NT BRL(<6) NT NT BRL(<5) NT 15 tt Bold text indicates results that exceed applicable groundwater category(s) Shaded areas designates appropriate groundwater category(s) Interior Monitoring Wells Results of November 2005 sampling event reported concentrations of TPH in central-area monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 as above the applicable GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1-Risk Characterization standards. Monitoring well SEA-1 reported concentrations of TPH at 39,000 µg/L and SEA-2 reported concentrations of TPH at 2,600 pig/L. No NAPL was observed in either of these central source-area monitoring wells. These most recent results as compared to TPH data previously collected indicates fluctuations of petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations over the past three years. Such fluctuations were observed in both monitoring points from the previous sampling event in May of 2005, as well as from the monitoring event in November of 2004. Regardless, groundwater impact above the applicable GW-1 and GW-3 standards continues to exist at the Site: The historic testing of the interior monitoring wells is presented in Table 3 and Table 4. i MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADBO02-3490 PAGE 16 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V Table 3: Method 1-Risk Characterization Standards EPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-CENTRAL GROUNDWATER Monitoring EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH RESULTS GW 1� Well Location RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS (µg/L-ppb) Stard � Sanjdard b�z (µg/L-ppb) (µ1/--ppb) (µme-ppb) (µme-ppb) [11/9/05- 310 GMR 10/02 2/5/04 11/10/04[ ] [ ] [ ] [5/26/OS] 11/10/OS] (Based on ALL PAH's (Based 60/40 split for on (Base d on 4 PAH's 60/40 split for 60/40 split for TPH results) TPH results) EPH results) MW-1. ,,s r :: i ,s kM�-ast5>i Yke St C9 to C18 200 700 NOT NOT NOT TESTED — 4 0�00.F- rM20 000 j C19 to.C36 NA BRL(<500) TESTED TESTEDAll, ; ,5�000 ter' 20 000= C11 to C22 300 450OR- � 2E00000t�' r 17 Target PAHs NT All BRL 4 f' TPH/Total EPH 500 1,150 `mil, 200200 , ,F,..b.<.�.>„aa-3..c�:�C S�ouc�,r• �•..,rw�k. i MW-2M C9 to C18 BRL BRL(<500) NOT NOT NOT TESTED �a 4"000 t .1 A ,20 000, 11 C19 to C36 BRL BRL(<500) TESTED TESTED 5 000� 'Y_yW O'000„liij'j� Cl1 to C22 BRL BRL(<160) 20' 30 000 17 Target PAHs NT All BRL i 4PAH 10/ALO 7,{j PAH4,50u/ALL?0 7 ,cif� I�� TPH/Total EPH BRL BRL � 00 �a .t2003 �f MW-4 taWt9 t f3snr [d a �I�E c. irT, 3df1",23 5i:r a C9 to C18 240 BRL(<500) NOT NOT NOT TESTED 'OOOxy � �20 000 ' C19 to C36 NA BRL(<500) TESTED TESTED � �5;000x "' '20'OQO, 3 C11 to C22 360 180 �� �' Nff "200 .r, ,� 9 30 000� % 4 PAH/12 PAH NT All BRL 4PaH�kO/ALL>0 7 AHa,sO/AI U07 2- _ , 5 sr qgg a TPH/1'otal EPH 600 180200 { SEA-1 ri° =fi i y''.i"ct g�'V C9 to C18 2,560 16,000 9,200 4,800 15,600 4,000 z�_ x20 000z C19 to C36 NA 2,300 NA NA NA �5 000 i i, � � 0�000 `?0 Cl 1 to C22 3,840 7,300 13,800 7,200 23,400 � 00 fi v I 1�43070000._ �Z Tar eet PAH NT NT NT R7 a , naphthalene 57 Fs' i c6� 004 � � 2-methylnaphthalene 10010 acenaphthene BRL(0.5) '; 20r` -� "y Z. acenaphthalylene 4:7 ,�' 300 ' �' r �a3�000 33 fluorene 11 a 300 ' �3c0�00 ' phenanthrene 16 � 300' anthracene 1.8 fluoranthene BRL(<0.5) ( 3�00 'gkELM OR r` 200 v. pyrene 1.7 200 '�,1':r .3000 suet ems._ r Pam. benzo(a)anthracene BRL(<O.1) � w l r 3�000` chrysene BRL(<O.1) 2 `3t000 benzo(b)fluoranthene BRL(<0.1) �3000 benzo(k)fluoranthene BRL(<0.1) 1 F '310001 benzo(a)pyrene BRL(<0.1) Fr 0 2 _ ! ;1� 3000� ideno1,2,3-c,d �pne BRL <0.1 �5 r d0'S OOb ' a dibenzo(a,h)anthracene BRL(<O.1) : 3 000��` 1 benzo(g>b,i)Perylene BRL(<O.1) �71s � 300 +� =S 3 000 TPH/Total EPH 6,400 , 26,000 23,000 12,000 39,000 � 00. �F a k 3,O,,U MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC. BROOKS ROAD/BO02-3490 PAGE 17 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V - o C9 to C18 16,000 4 300 32 400 840 1 040, , , C19 to C36 NA 650 NA NA NA ' � � � Cl1 toC22 24,000 1,400 48,600 1,260 1,560 x `sue=f00 36:,a� 3 00 Target PAH NT NT NT NT x 1 w X ` naphthalene 0.6 20 2-methylnaphthalene 9.20,E�E° r r3�000 <0.5 BRL acena hthene P ( ) S$0,0' . . acenaphthalylene 1.4 5300 E�hr3 000; fluorene 3.03 000 _ phenanthrene 4.3300 P 50 �+�d �„. ,•,c.a ss'i c'3�,E anthracene BRL(<0.5) �0l�0 h �j QQO fluoranthene BRL(<0.5) r 300— R� 200= pyrene BRL(<O:5) 2� s 3 000 benzo(a)anthracene BRL(<0.1) Vi c ene BRL <O.1) r ash" L sE L ;� ( ,a �r+ t3 OOOL r benzo(b)fluoranthene BRL(<O.1) benao(k)fluoranthene BRL(<O.1) benzo(a)pyrene BRL(<O.1) idenol,2,3-c,d)pyrene BRL(<O.1) dibenzo(a,h)anthracene BRL(<O.1) a�.3x fix._ benzo(g,h,i)perylene BRL(<O.1) TPH/Total EPH 40,000 6,450 81,000 2,100 2,60000a _ Bold text indicates results that exceed applicable groundwater category(s) M Shaded areas designates appropriate groundwater category(s) Table 4: Method 1 -Risk Characterization Standards VPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-CENTRAL GROUNDWATER Monitoring VPH VPH VPH VPH 49GW l µ GWRj Well Location RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS Standard t-- �T � w ----r•�ax (llg/L-PPb) (µme--PPb) (µg/L-PPb) (µg/L-PPb) Y(PPb) E7P�p"b �y [10/23/02] [2/5/04] [11/10/04] [1119105- >.q 310 Mft,7 3L0 MR� 11/10/05] 40 974(2) , 40t974(2) MW-1 r, GF"s . C5 to C8 NOT BRL(<20) NOT NOT k400 R 4 000�rx C9 to C 12 TESTED BRL(<20) TESTED TESTED t 4,000 A' xr 20 000 �9 r3 C9 to CIO BRL(<20) 200 4 Eut4 000 benzene BRL(<I) 6 ethylbenzene BRL(<5) toluene BRL( )<5 ` lyY000 , k 4 000 xylene BRL(<5) 10 OOOF k 50 000 - naphthalene BRL(<5) 20 6,000 MTBE BRL(<5) °MW-2 , - , CS to C8 NOT BRL(<40) NOT NOT 00Va;*g y4f000; C9 to C12 TESTED BRL <40 TESTED TESTED =4000T $ 20 000"n ' C9 to CIO 43 rsE200 nak E4 a000 � be BRL(<2) S r fi x { '7�000 �Sc ethylbenzene BRL(<10) € 700, [,�4 000 toluene BRL(<10) •`:- jQ50 000 xylene BRL(<10) 10 OOOx td50 000 naphthalene BRL(<10) ''` 20 ,i 6 000 MTBE BRL <10 r a . MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADB002-3490 PAGE 18 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V Table 4: Method 1 -Risk Characterization Standards VPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-CENTRAL GROUNDWATER g Monitorin VPH VPH VPH VPH W 1 _ Well Location RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS '� tandarda arcs ' 5. y -.3standard, (PP/--ppb) (µg/L-ppb) (µPS-ppb) (µme-ppb) [10/23/02] [2/5/04] [11/10/04] [11/9/05- j�y-dg3�10 CM � 3�1CMlt � 11/10/05] yy;, 40 97y4(2) 40.9,74(2)�,.,.�L MW-4 :1 z'W • 'd j S .�L'L'd7 C5 to C8. BRL(<20) BRL(<20) NOT NOT °; 40 r4 000t n 4 000 ;'�� �20 �Q�z ;i C9 to C12 43 BRL(<20) TESTED TESTED OO L ,M 4 ' 3 C9 to C10 73 23 OD E4`000` benzene BRL(<1) BRL(<1) 5 � 7£000'" ethylbenzene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) toluene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) rr ?1 OOOr;r + 50 OOU' xylene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) - 10000 �t z50{000`�t ; �x.F '^ems � sc mii•_-ess�r � s naphthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) x 20 t 6 000 MTBE BRL(<5) BRL(<5) PO =_50`000?�;Lw SEA-1 CS to C8 NOT 850 NOT NOT nM INfl S C9 to C12 TESTED 2,300 TESTED TESTED z 40300- g- 20;-000;-� ._-9= C9 to C10 6,600m200 s 4 OQO benzene 9 Ls551�° ethylbenzene 470 e � 700 f s4M000 toluene 620cs'�s�k000; 6500 0�j xylene 2,730 r;as' 30 000 SOL000-ter naphthalene 280 M MTBE BRL(<10) h 50,0004 ; SEA-2 L: C5 to C8 NOT 34 NOT NOT ' 40Q a4 c�4 000y z ' C9 to C12 TESTED 500 TESTED TESTED 4 000 r > 20 000 -r C9 to C10 770 benzene BRL(<I) 5 y t 37`000; i ethylbenzene BRL(<5) r700 i 4 000,E + tr toluene BRL(<5) `1 0009" �50 000. u�s xylene BRL(<5) TL0000 , +q'fSOs0004;.�, naphthalene 13 7420Y 6 000 cr L.. s MTBE BRL(<5) F �SU�000m Bold text indicates results that exceed applicable groundwater category(s) Shaded areas designates appropriate groundwater category(s) Microbial Respiration Analysis Respiration analysis was performed on November 9, 2005,February 7, 2006 and March 2, 2006 in order to compare baseline and post-venting conditions of bacterial respiration to current respiration-rates and to track respiration rates and reported TOV concentrations as a measure of relative treatment performance. Previous analysis of soils collected from SVE A-1 and SVE B-3 indicated sufficient indigenous bacteria with a lack of sufficient nutrients. Respiration analysis of baseline conditions indicated excellent biological activity with minimal methane,as an indicator of anaerobic respiration and an oxygen-limited environment. Significant carbon dioxide accumulation was also observed. Minimal amounts of methane were observed in some of the more heavily impacted vapor points. Respiration analysis conducted on November 9,2005 indicated excellent biological activity and increased respiration rates. Compared to baseline and previously measured conditions,average MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROAD/B002-3490 PAGE 19 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V methane concentrations decreased from 0.46%during baseline analysis and 0.66%during respiration analysis in November of 2004,to 0.21%. An average oxygen concentration of 7.2%was established as comparable to baseline and previously observed concentrations with an average concentration of 7.86% during baseline analysis and 8.1% in November of 2004. Average carbon dioxide concentrations increased to 10.8%from the 9.3%established through baseline analysis and the 9.7% established in November 2004. Specifically,carbon dioxide concentrations increased in four of the SVE points as compared to concentrations in November 2004. The increase in the average carbon dioxide levels indicated that the microbe populations within impacted soils at the Site were flourishing and that mineralization of petroleum hydrocarbons was occurring. With the introduction of nutrients and oxygen, the potential to increase mineralization rates was considered excellent. Results of the respiration analyses are included for reference in Appendix B. Although respiration analysis was conducted on February 7, 2006, the bio-venting system was not shut down for a standard period of 24 hours prior to the analysis. Therefore,there was not a sufficient amount of time for the respiration gases to accumulate within the piping. As such,the concentrations of oxygen, carbon dioxide and methane recorded during the February 7, 2006 respiration analysis are not considered to be indicative of true respiration performance and a more accurate respiration analysis was performed again on March 2, 2006. Nutrients, consisting of Miracle Grow and water,were added to each ofthe SVE points during the February 2006 respiration analysis event. A copy of the February results are included in Appendix B but are not discussed in this section. Respiration analysis conducted on March 2,2006 indicated excellent biological activity and respiration rates. Compared to baseline conditions and respiration analysis from November 2005, average methane concentrations decreased from 0.46%during baseline analysis and 0.21%during respiration analysis in November of 2005 to an average methane concentration of 0.09%,though it is noted that methane concentrations were only observed in two of the eight SVE points. The concentration of oxygen, which is the limiting factor in aerobic respiration, increased slightly to 10.7%compared with 7.86%during baseline analysis and 7.2%measured in November 2005. The average carbon dioxide concentration decreased to 5.5% from 9.3% during baseline analysis and 10.8% measured in November 2005. Specifically, carbon dioxide concentrations increased significantly in two of the eight SVE points over the previous testing performed in November 2005. However, with standing water observed in the upper portion of SVE point B4-S, due to the construction of the SVE point and the addition of nutrients during the February respiration analysis event, the respiration gasses were not able to be adequately sampled from that point. In addition, moderate decreases in concentration were observed in the five remaining SVE points resulting in a reduced average concentration. Results of the respiration analyses are included for reference in Appendix B. MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROAD/BO02-3490 PAGE 20 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V REMEDIAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Soil/Bio-ventinl? As noted,no additional soil sampling has been conducted over the reporting period for the qualification of contaminant reduction in unsaturated soils within the vadose zone in the areas of identified impact. Such testing will be conducted in May 2006. As previously noted, respiration analysis has been conducted on a quarterly basis over the reporting period with excellent biological activity and increased respiration rates observed. It should also be noted that simply by operating the bioventing system, petroleum hydrocarbons are being removed from impacted soils via vapor extraction. Calculations of the amount of hydrocarbons removed from the soil were made based on the average concentration of TOV readings (120ppm)being removed by the regenerative blower operating four(4)hours a day (2x/day for 2 hours) since September 23,2005 (166 days)with an average flow of 44SCFM. This information indicates that some'5.7 gallons of gasoline have been removed within the reporting period as an additional benefit of the bioventing strategy. However the actual reduction in hydrocarbon mass is expected to be much greater due to mineralization of contaminants by indigenous microbes in the soil,to be qualified by soil testing in May 2006. This information will be used to adjust operational controls to maximize petroleum hydrocarbon reduction. Groundwater/Reactive Barrier The remedial additive ORC-Advanced was applied as a reactive barrier as well as within the source area in April 2005. Groundwater sampling of downgradient perimeter monitoring wells continues to show concentrations of EPH and VPH at or below the applicable GW-1 Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. Groundwater sampling of central wells SEA-1 and SEA-2,located immediately downgradient of the source areas,continue to fluctuate and show little or no attenuation. A Mann-Kendall statistical evaluation of laboratory results from 2004 indicate a negative one(4) value at SEA-1 and a negative two (-2)value at SEA-2, statistically indicating overall attenuation. However,these monitoring wells have shown significant fluctuations throughout the year. As such, additional monitoring is necessary to determine if such attenuation can be attributed to the application of the ORC-Advanced in the source area or to seasonal and/or groundwater table variations. Based on the fact that the perimeter downgradient monitoring wells continue to report fractional VPH/EPH and target analyte concentrations below the most restrictive GW-1,Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards,the reactive barrier has proven effective in mitigating any issues of substantial release migration. Tables 5 and 6 show the Kendall-Man worksheets below. MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADB002-3490 PAGE 21 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V x.r 't'¢. r s >��eN. ''�.• ','i �c Table 5;,Mann;Kendall— rksheet for SEA 1 Date 2/04 11/04 5105 11105 Totals Conc.(mg/L) 26.0 23.0 12.0 39.0 26.0 -1 -1 +1 -2 23.0 -1 +1 0 12.0 +1 +1 39.0 -1 �Taber 1e�6:.Mann e�ndall�W,,orksL�heet forS�EA�2,;� Date 2/04 11/04 5105 11105 Totals Conc.(mg/L) 6.45 81.0 2.1 2.6 6.45 +1 -1 -1 -1 81.0 1 -1 -2 2.1 +1 +1 2.6 -2 Remedial Additive Monitorins? During the November sampling event the perimeter monitoring wells were sampled for wet chemistry in accordance with the provisions for remedial additive use, 310 CMR 40.0046. Wet chemistry analysis included nitrate, nitrite, TKN, total nitrogen, sulfate, total iron, manganese, magnesium and total phosphorus. Concentrations of wet chemistry parameters observed over the reporting period have been consistent with baselinelbackground concentrations as indicating no significant degradation of water quality associated with remedial treatments downgradient of the treatment area. Soil Removal with Engineered Barrier and Infiltration S, stem The excavation of significantly contaminated near surface accessible soils with the construction of an engineered barrier was originally proposed under the Phase IV to reduce contaminant source and cap accessible soils to help mitigate issues of leaching to groundwater. The installation of an infiltration system was also proposed beneath the engineered barrier to introduce moisture and nutrients into the soil for the benefit of microbial populations and facilitate bioventing performance. The removal of accessible soils and construction of an engineered barrier remains a viable option in absolving leaching to groundwater and direct contact exposures at the Site. This option will be revisited pending qualification of petroleum hydrocarbon reductions in groundwater and soils after bi-annual groundwater/annual soil testing in May 2006. No complete exposure pathways currently exist at the Site as the property is completely surrounded by a 6'chain-link fence. r MARCH 16,2006 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADB002-3490 PAGE 22 OF 23 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V RISK CHARACTERIZATION AND REVIEW OF SUBSTANTIAL HAZARD During the reporting period, and throughout testing conducted over the past 41 months, all concentrations of EPH and VPH and associated target analytes in downgradient monitoring wells have been consistently reported as at or below the applicable GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. As such,no Substantial Release Migration or critical ingestion exposure to the Maher Wellfield,inhalation exposures to occupied buildings,or environmental impact to the downgradient wetlands is attributed to groundwater impact associated with the subject Site at this time. Therefore,there is neither a condition of Imminent Hazard nor any Substantial Hazard at the site indicated under current Site Conditions FUTURE OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Bio-venting System Operation&Maintenance: Inspections of the bio-venting system will continue on a monthly basis. At the time of inspection, the vacuum, pressure and flow gauges will be checked. The moisture trap will be emptied and remedial wastewater removed and stored in a sealed DOT drum in the secured storage building. The particle filter will also be checked and cleaned or replaced as necessary. A photoionization detector will be used to record the TOV concentrations in the influent air and intermediate to the GAC units for evidence of breakthrough. The primary GAC unit will be replaced when intermediate breakthrough is indicated. Based on the new WAVE 2 regulations, effective Spring 2006, a Remedial System Monitoring Report will also be submitted to the Department electronically every three-months as required by the new regulations. i Environmental Monitoring Respiration analysis will continue to be performed quarterly as a measure of system performance. As respiration rates approach those of background concentrations,or on a minimum annual basis, test borings will be conducted for the qualification of soil treatment for EPH and/or VPH analysis as dependent on the known contaminant source. This information will be compared with baseline test results in review of SVE performance and closure objectives. Soil samples will also be analyzed on an annual basis for wet chemistry and bacteria counts to' assure adequate nutrients to support indigenous bacteria populations and to qualify respiration rates for microbial activity. The next soil sampling event is currently scheduled for May 2006. It is noted that at the present time, access to the area of soil impact is restricted by perimeter fencing. Employees of Hubbard Oil have been advised of environmental hazards, and therefore, no Critical Exposure Pathways are complete at the present time. Environmental Monitoring: Groundwater Bi-annual (May/November) groundwater monitoring of the downgradient perimeter monitoring wells GZA-1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW-6S(R), D will be conducted for EPH and VPH analysis with target analytes. The most heavily impacted central monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 will be sampled for EPH and VPH(carbon range only)to quantify the fractional petroleum MARCH 16,2006 PAGE 23 OF 23 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.-BROOKS ROADBO02-3490 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT V hydrocarbons in comparison to baseline analytical results. Wet chemistry sampling will also be conducted in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0046. Wet chemistry will include nitrate, total nitrogen, sulfate, iron, manganese, magnesium and total phosphorus. On an annual basis(May),EDB and lead analysis will be conducted in the perimeter wells. All sampling will be accompanied by field measurements of dissolved oxygen,pH, conductivity and temperature. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The findings of the Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report V, as represented herein, set forth the rationale and technical justification for the selection ofthe selected bio-remediation strategy as the preferred remedial alternative. The bio-remedial strategy set forth in the Phase IV'Remedy Implementation Plan(6/23/03)has been implemented and monthly inspections are being performed at the Site as Operation and Maintenance of the active remedial system. Quarterly respiration analysis performed under the current environmental monitoring program indicates significant numbers of petroleum degraders are present as supported by the active bioventing system. Although no significant attenuation of petroleum impact to groundwater in the release area has been documented by such efforts, the testing of downgradient sentinel wells continues to document a condition of No Substantial Hazard under current conditions, with no indication of Substantial Release Migration or complete inhalation, ingestion or direct contact exposure pathways to identified human and environmental receptors. The LSP opinions represented by this report are established by the certifications made on the attached Comprehensive Response Action[BWSC-108] Transmittal Form. The LSP opinions are based upon available data and regulations in effect at the time of this reporting. Should you have E any questions or require any further information,please contact me directly. a S' cere , B ILLY, INC. A C E v1d nnett LSP J hn D. ad ma- 1 dt f Director lronmental Services roject Manager 3. i encl. -Report entitled"Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report V", Prepared by BENNETT& O'REILLY, ITC.,Dated March 16, 2006 s -Comprehensive Response Action Transmittal Form, BWSC-108 (original) cc: Hubbard Oil,Inc. -Attn: Evelyn Read, General Manager Robert A. Fasanella,Esq. -RUBIN&RUDMAN,LLP Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department(narrative only) Thomas McKean-Barnstable Board of Health(narrative only) John Klimm-Barnstable Town Manager(narrative only) David Condry-Barnstable Water Company(narrative only) John RoB3chaud,.Abutter Robie's Refrigeration(narrative only) ' ' COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACFlUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENviR.ONMENTAL AF FAiAs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRO 'I�IUR4 'T ►BLE SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE --2005 MAR 18 P11 3: 32 20 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, L/iKEVILLE, MA 02347 508-9..46.2700, ner kOMNEY Go —� ; . Governor " ZFELDER Secretary FMRRYY ROBFRT W GOLLDDG�,Jr. Lieutenant(rtrvprnor Commissioner FAX COVLk SHLLT FAX (508)947-6557 DATE TELEI HONE##(508) 8Z� PLEASE DELIVER TO: COMPANY NAME: L� 4w o ADBR4"' YELECOPIFRNUMBER: - 15N)0k LAY19 (, d 7,�30�� r� TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE : � -(INCfUDING COVER PAGE) I . PLEASE CALL IF YOU DO NOT <CEIVL A COMPLETE FAX. REMAI .-, I _ This information is available in alternate format Call Donald K Gomes,AD9 Coordinator at 617-55G 3057 1`DA Scrvicc-1 3200 79�2207,. DZP on the World Wide Web: http:lhvww.mass.gov/dep iO Printod on Recycled Paper III a 1 ' I I L V V V I L ' I ?I III 11 V L I I V I L/ 1 -\ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXEcuTiVE OFFICE OF ENVIRoNMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE UV 20 RIVERSIDE DRIVE,LAKEVILLE,MA 02347(508)946-2700 MITT RONDM ELLEN ROY HERZI?ELDER Governor Secretary ICERRY HEALEY ROBERT W GOLLEDGE,Jr. LieutenantGovernor Commi8eioner March 15, 2005 Mr..Robert A. Fasanella, Esquire RE: BARNSTABLE-BWSC c/o Mr.Bertrand Fournier RTN 4-0824 ; Rubin and Rudman,LLP Hubbard Oil Company 50 Rowes Wharf 33-51 Brooks Road Boston,Massachusetts 02210-3319 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE NON-SE-05-3T-209 THIS IS AN IMPORTANT NOTICE. FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE ACTION IN RESPONSE TO THIS NOTICE COULD RESULT IN SERIOUS LEGAL CONSEQUENCES. Dear Mr. Fasanella: The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste .Site Cleanup (the `Department', is tasked with ensuring the cleanup of oil and hazardous material releases pursuant to Massachusetts General Law-Chapter 21E ("Chapter 21E'). The law is implemented through regulations known, as the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, 310 CMR . 40.0000 et seq. (the"MCP"), Through the MCP, 'the Department is currently regulating -a release of oil and/or hazardous material that has occurred at the Hubbard Oil'Company (the "Site') located at 33-51 Brooks Road in Hyazulis, Massachusetts. The Department was first notified of the release on November 1, 19m The Department's records indicate that you (as used in this Notice, "you" collectively refers to Hubbard Oil Company) ere a Potentially Responsible Party(a"PRP") for this release. This Notice is provided to inform you that you are not in compliance with the MCP. The Department has no record of your completing the response actions required by the MCP to address this release. Attachm, nt 1 of this Notice is a Noncompliance Summary Sheet that outlines .the provisions of the MCP that you have not complied with. Contained within the Noncompliance Summary are the necessary action(s) you must complete to return to compliance. Additionally, Thix information is available in alternate format.Call Donald Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617.556.I057_TDp Service-.1-800.298-2207. DEP en the.Worid Wide Web: Wp://www.mass.gov/dep �,�� Printed on Recycled Paper ni u I • I I c V V V I L . I I I In IY V - L I 1 V f J/ 1 I Barnstable-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0824 Page 2 of 2 Notice of Noncompliance there is a prescribed deadline for your completion of the action(s). The deadlines established herein can not be extended and are not subject to the seven (7) day grace period as allowed by 310 CMR 40.0008(4). The submittals required by this Notice are due to the Department by the deadlines established herein. You-will remain out of compliance with the provisions of this Notice until all of the corrective actions stated in the Noncompliance Summary Sheet have been completed and documentation is submitted to the Department confirming the actions have been completed in accordance herewith. Notwithstanding this Notice of Noncompliance ("NON"), the Department reserves the right to exercise the full extent of its legal authority in order to obtain full compliance with all applicable requirements, including, but not limited to, criminal prosecution, civil action including court-imposed civil penalties, or administrative penalties assessed by the Department. Finally, Attachment 2 of this Notice is a fact sheet containing supplemental information regarding this NON. If you have any questions regarding this matter, or if you would like to discuss compliance with this Notice, please contact Laura Stanley, at the letterhead address or by telephone at (508) 946-2880. All future communication regarding this matter must reference Release Tracking Number 4-0824. Sincerely, n Jonathan E. Hobill,Regional Engineer Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Attachment 1: Noncompliance Summary Sheet Attachment 2: Supplemental Information Regarding the Notice of Noncompliance H/LASAs CERTIFIED MAIL#70041160 0006 2134 8539 4-0824 Notice of Noncompliance—Nonresponder fe: John Klimm,Town of Barnstable,Manager(508)790-6226 Thomas A. McKearn, Town of Barnstable,Director,Division of Health, (508)790-6304 David Bennett, LSP,.Bennett& O'Reilly,Incorporated, (508) 896-4687 ec: DEP-SERO-Data Entry(e-copy) cc'. DEP-SERO-Regional Enforcement Office (2 copies) I I l u I I I L V V V I L I 't I III I'I V L I I V f Y/ v ATTACHMENT 1 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY ENTITY/POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY IN NONCOMPLIANCE: Mr. Bertrand Fournier Hubbard Oil Company 33-51 Brooks Road Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 LOCATION WHERE NONCOMPiYANCE OCCURRED OR WAS OBSERVED: Hubbard Oil Company, RTN 4-0824 33-51 Brooks Road Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 DATE WHEN NONCOMPLIANCE OCCURRED OR WAS OBSERVED: February 2,2005 LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL AT TIME OF NONCOMPLIANCE: David Bennett,LSP Number 4303 Bennett& O'Reilly, Incorporated. 233 Clay Hole Road South Orleans,Massachusetts 02662 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY OR CONDITION RESULTING IN NONCOMPLIANCE: You have not submitted Phase V Inspection and Monitoring (I&M) Reports to the Department for the Site pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0891(5). DESCRIPTION OF REOUIREMENT NOT COMPLIED WITH: Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0891(5), information and data on the operation, maintenance and/or monitoring conducted pursuant to the provisions of Phase V shall be gathered and submitted to the Department every six (6) months in a report prepared pursuant to 310 CMR 40„0892. DESCRIPTION AND DEADLINES OF ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN: To avoid imposition of a Civil Administrative Penalty,-the following actions) must be completed within the timeframes specified below: By April 15, 2005, submit to the Department a Phase V-I&M Report for the Site prepared pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0892, or a Response Action Outcome Statement for the entire Site pursuant to 310 C dR 40.1000. If an I&M Report is submitted to the Department for the Site, additional I&M Reports should be submitted to the Department every 6 months thereafter until an RAO is submitted to the Department for the Site. IVIdI - III LUV0 1t - 14rIVI 11U - LI10 r 0/ I Barnstable(Hyannis)-BWSC RT N.4-0824 Page 2 of 2 Notice of Noncornpliance—Attachment I The deadlines established herein are not subject to the seven (7) day grace period as allowed by 310 CMR 40.0008(4). The submittals required by this Notice are due to the Department by the deadlines established herein. If at any time during the MCP cleanup process documentation is submitted to the Department to support the conclusion that a level of No Significant Risk and a Class A or B Response Action Outcome Statement have been achieved for the entire Site, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1000, additional response actions are no longer necessary at the Site 1310 C1VM 40.1003(1)}. Upon performance of all of the required response actions under this Notice, your LSP should certify that the Respondent has implemented response actions in accordance with M.G.L. c..21E and the MCP and complied with this Notice„ Notwithstanding this Notice of Noncompliance, the Department reserves the right to exercise the full extent of its legal authority to obtain full compliance with all applicable requirements, including but not limited to, criminal prosecution, civil action including court-imposed civil penalties, and Civil Administrative Penalties issued by the Department. 'If you have any questions regarding this matter, or if you would like to discuss compliance with this Notice, please contact Laura Stanley at the letterhead address or by telephone at (508) 946-2880. All future communications regarding this matter must reference Release Tracking Number 4-0824.. i i III 1 I I LV VV I L A I 'tI 111 14V L I I V f V/ I R� ATTACHMENT 2: NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION This attachment further explains why this Notice of Noncompliance (NON) has been issued to YOU. Why was I issued this NON? The Department's records indicate that you have not submitted one or more of the documents, or conducted one or more of the response actions, listed in the attached NON. This NON was issued to inform you of this fact and offer you an opportunity to come back into compliance by submitting the missing information to the Department, or conducting the response actions,by the deadlines specified in the NON. The Department's records also indicate that you were issued a Tier I Permit (the Permit). By accepting the Permit, you agreed to conduct response actions at the site in accordance with the terms and the conditions set forth in the Permit and the provisions of the.MCP, 310 CMR 40.0000. In addition, you agreed to notify the Department in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0172 if you are/were unable to proceed with such actions. WhAt happens if I fail to comply with or respond to the NON? You have a specified amount of time from the date you receive the NON to comply, as is stated in Attachment 1. If you fail to comply, you may be subject to additional enforcement action by the Department including, but not limited to, criminal prosecution, civil action including court- imposed civil penalties, or administrative penalties. If a penalty is assessed,your total penalty exposure may be considerable. For example,penalties can be assessed for each day you remain in noncompliance. Note that the Department is allowed by law to back calculate daily penalties to begin on the date you received the NON. As a result, you may be penalized thousands of dollars should you fail to comply with or respond to the NON by the deadline specified. Please refer to the Civil Administrative Penalty Statute, Chapter 21A, Section 16 and 310 CMR 5.00, and the Civil Administrative Penalty Regulations, for complete details on the Administrative Penalty rules. When the cleanup contractor finished the work in the field, I thought my dealings with the Department were finished. What more do I have to do? This is a common question asked when a NON is received. PRPs often think their dealings with the Department are over when, for example, the fieldwork is completed by a cleanup contractor. Examples of the types of fieldwork completed include the removal of contaminated soil; installation of groundwater monitoring wells; collection and analysis of soil, groundwater, air or surface water samples; and installation and/or operation and maintenance of a remedial system (examples include a groundwater pump and treat system, a soil vapor extraction system and/or III U I I I ' L V V V I L ' I V I III 11 V • L I I Barnstable(Hyannis)-BWSC RTN 4-0824 Page 2 of 2 Notice of Noncompliance—Attachment 2 an air sparging system)_ The fieldwork may be complete, but you still must submit documentation (such as Immediate Response Action Status and Completion Reports, Phase Reports, and a Response Actiori Outcome Statement)to the Department to prove that the cleanup was undertaken in compliance with the MCP and the terms and conditions of the Tier I Permit. The Department tracks the progress of cleanups by checking to see if you are sending information about your cleanup progress on time. For example, if we do not receive the Phase Reports described in 310 CMR 40.0800 within the time frames allotted in the MCP, (refer to 310 CMR 40.0550) or a Response Action Outcome (RAO) Statement within five (5) years of the effective date of the Tier I Permit, we mast assume that you are either not.implementing any cleanup activities at all or are conducting response actions at the site without a valid Permit. Without your cooperation in obtaining the cleanup information, the Department does not know Whether serious environmental problems are being addressed., If work is not being performed or is not being performed in compliance with the Tier I Permit, the Department must take action to ensure it happens. On the other hand, you may have finished the cleanup but neglected to forward the appropriate documentation required by the MCP and the Permit. 3 What do I have to do to comply with the NON? - — 1 In order to comply with the•NON; you must conduct the response actions, if applicable, and submit the documentation stated in Attachment 1 of this NON, Noncompliance Summary. Please be advised that all response actions not directly managed by Department staff must be overseen and directed by a "Licensed Site Professional' or LSP. LSPs are licensed by the Commonwealth, and their stamp and signature are required (together with yours) on all but one form you must submit to the Department. For information on hiring an LSP, you may call the LSP Board at (617) 556-1091. You should be aware that the Department does not become involved in or help mediate billing disputes with insurance companies, cleanup contractors, or LSPs. A common response to a NON is that an insurance company is slow on paying cleanup bills or will not cover various cleanup costs. We also hear that cleanup firms and LSPs will not send in RAOs and other forms because their clients have not paid their bills. These matters must be resolved privately by you. You ultimately must comply with the attached NON or be subject to significant penalties from the Department. z REMEDIAL OPERATION PLAN STATUS REPORT III SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN 4-0824/4-15370 Hubbard Oil Co., Inc. 33 & 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328, Parcel 125 & 126] Hyannis, MA. 02601 Project#B002-3490 MARCH 8, 2005 ENNET T A O'REILLY. Inc. Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line PO Box 1667 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Brewster, MA 02631 Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Licensed Site Professional Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax ENNET T A 0 9 RE I L Ly, Inc. Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line PO Box 1667 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Brewster, MA 02631 Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Licensed Site Professional Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax B002-3490 March 8, 2005 Mr. Gerard Martin, Chief Sites Management&Permitting Section,BWSC MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION(MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office (SERO) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC)/Sites Management Program(SMP) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 RE: REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT III Hubbard Oil Company. Inc. -RTN 4-0824 33 and 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 14, Parcel 25 and 26] Hyannis, MA 02532 Dear Mr. Martin: On behalf of our client,Hubbard Oil,Inc.,BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC., has prepared this Remedy Operation Status Report III for the above referenced Site,consistent with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0893. This filing documents the remedial response actions and environmental monitoring activities conducted at the Site over the past six(6)months which include among other things passive bioventing, microbial respiration analysis of bioventing performance and the groundwater sampling and laboratory testing of perimeter and interior monitoring wells in review of any potential Critical Exposure Pathways (CEP's). in this period, microbial respiration rates indicate effective hydrocarbon mineralization in impacted soils. Furthermore, the environmental analysis of downgradient monitoring wells documents that the potential CEP's are incomplete and that a condition of No Substantial Hazard is present under current Site conditions. Over the preceding eighteen months,work progress and remedial efforts have been impeded by publically announced Town of Barnstable eminent domain taking of the Hubbard properties for the Barnstable Airport expansion project. Based upon an apparent dispute over fair market value, appropiate response measures and relocation costs,neither the Town of Barnstable or their agents, could represent the intended development of the property to accommodate intended future remediation by Hubbard or agree to remedial obligations and allocations under the sale of the property.Most recently,the Town of Barnstable has made a formal declaration [February 3,2005], that it had insufficient funds and/or incentive to acquire the Hubbard properties at this time or the 1 MARCH 8,2005 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 2 OF 9 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT III foreseeable future. Therefore the PRP has authorized the full construction, operations and maintenance of an active bioventing system with use of remedial additives to construct a reactive barrier with reinstated quarterly environmental monitoring as outlined in the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan(June 23, 2003). This Remedy Operation Status III(BOPS III)document is an addendum to,and an essential part of, the public record for site characterization, risk assessment of exposure pathways and corrective remedial efforts under Comprehensive Response Actions as a Tier 1C Site. For the purposes of this report, the previous information offered is omitted as redundant and summarized only to orient the reader. For specific information on historic environmental assessment activities and remedial response actions,the reader should reference the"Phase I Limited Site Investigation" [LCR (2/20/90)], "Phase I - Initial Site Investigation with Tier Classification" [RAM (8/9/96)], "Immediate Response Action Completion Report"[SEA(8/11/00)],and the Phase R Scope of Work (9/20/02), Phase lI Comprehensive Site Assessment Completion Statement (11/18/02), and Phase III Identification, Evaluation and Selection of Comprehensive Response Actions (2/18/03), Phase IV Implementation of Selected Remedial Action Alternatives (6/23/03),Remedy Operation Status Report I (12/30/03), and Remedy Operation Status Report H (7/12/04), documents prepared by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. as filed with the MA DEP (SERO). The work represented within this document,has proceeded under my supervision in a manner consistent with 309 CMR 4.02 (2), the MCP Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS), pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0191 and Quality Assurance/Quality Control policies of BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. The facts and statements herein are, to the best of our knowledge, a true and accurate representation of the current Site activities, remedial response actions and environmental conditions associated with the project. As such,this document serves as the technical justification and rationale for the LSP Opinions represented by the certifications on the Comprehensive Response Action transmittal forms [BWSC-108] attached. REMEDY OPERATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING [APPENDIX B & D] Perimeter Monitoring_Wells On November 10,2004,BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.personnel were on-site to complete bi-annual groundwater sampling of select downgradient and source area monitoring wells in review of'critical exposure pathways as associated with soil and groundwater impacts exceeding the applicable Method 1-Risk Characterization Standards at the subject Site, as specified in the Environmental Monitoring section of the previous ROS-2 report. Downgradient monitoring wells GZA-1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW-6 S/D on the Robies Refrigeration property were gauged, developed and sampled for EPH and VPH for all target poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and volatile organics (BTEX). Source area monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 on the Hubbard properties were sampled for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). Results of the November 2004 bi-annual sampling event reported concentrations of VPH C9 to C10 fractional aromatics in downgradient wells GZA-2 and MW-6S slightly above the method MARCH 8,2005 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 3 OF 9 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT III detection limit of 20 µg/L. Perimeter monitoring wells MW-5S and D,and MW-6S and D reported fractional VPH compounds as below the reporting limit (BRL) of the analysis. In each case, the reported value or reporting limit was a concentration less than the applicable GW-1/GW-3,Method 1-Risk Characterization Standards. Concentrations of fractional EPH compounds were reported as BRL in the GZA-2, MW- 5S/D and MW-6S/D monitoring wells. In each case the reporting limits were concentrations less that the applicable GW-1/GW-3,Method 1-Risk Characterization Standards. Likewise,the aliphatic compounds in the GZA-1 monitoring well were reported as BRL. The concentrations of the C11 to C22 aromatic compounds were reported in GZA-1 at the GW-1 ,Method 1 -Risk Characterization Standard of 200 jig/L. Aromatic concentrations within this well were previously reported as BRL (<160ug/L) [10/9/03] and 160 ug/L[2/5/04] in the most recent sampling. Based on the current and historic data for these perimeter wells, fractional EPH concentrations appear to represent no significant groundwater impact outside the area of the defined Site and no substantial release migration is documented in the sentinel wells. Several Poly- cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) were also reported in perimeter monitoring wells GZA-1,GZA-2 and MW-6S. As was previously established in the ROS H report, higher molecular weight Polynilclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), beyond the typical naphthalene, 2 methylnapthalene, acenapthene and acenapthlylene associated with virgin fuel oil, are unrelated to groundwater impacts associated with the release under RTN#4-0824. Based on the historic distribution and concentrations of PAH's in soils at the Hubbard property and the current spacial and temporal occurrence of these high molecular weight PAH's in groundwater at the Robies property alone,it appears that the likely source of coal tar derivatives is associated with the railway easement, wherein historic and current uses utilize creosote treated timbers. Of the related naphthalene, 2 methylnapthalene, acenapthene and acenapthlylene PAH's, none of the reported concentrations or the BRL reporting limits exceed the applicable GW-1 and GW-3,Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards in the downgradient sentinel wells as indicating no significant groundwater impact outside the area of the defined Site and no substantial release migration as associated with the RTN#4-0824. Again, as previously stated in the ROS II report, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., has concluded that while the concentrations detected of the high molecular weight PAH's are above the RCGW-1 Concentrations under the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0317(9),(12)and(16 a)the identified "release"did not require Release Notification because, (1) the release is suspected to be related to coal tar from the creosoted timbers,(2)because the release is emanating from building materials that are in good repair and still serving their original intended use, and(3)response actions are already being undertaken at the Hubbard site in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0000 as Adequately Regulated. Interior Monitoring Wells Central wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 reported concentrations of TPH significantly above the applicable GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1-Risk Characterization Standards. Monitoring well SEA-1 MARCH 8,2005 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 4 OF 9 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT III reported concentrations of TPH at 23,000 µg/L and SEA-2 reported concentrations of TPH at 81,000 µg/L. No NAPL was observed in either of these central source-area miotlitoring wells. These most recent results were compared to baseline TPH and previously collected EPH data and indicate significant groundwater impact above the applicable GW- and GW-3 standards with little or no attenuation. This residual and persistent groundwater impact is the target of the bioremediation treatment through the construction of a reactive barrier and the stimulation of microbial growth for petroleum mineralization. Microbial Respiration Analysis Respiration analysis was performed on November 10, 2004, in order to compare baseline conditions and post-venting conditions of bacterial respiration to current respiration rates. Previous analysis of soils collected from SVE A-1 and SVE B-3 indicated sufficient indigenous bacteria but with a lack of sufficient nutrients. Respiration analysis of baseline conditions indicated excellent biological activity with minimal methane and significant carbon dioxide accumulation. Minimal amounts of methane were observed in some of the more heavily impacted vapor points. The presence of methane is an indicator of anaerobic respiration and 'suggests an oxygen-limited environment. Respiration analysis conducted on November 10, 2004 also indicated excellent biological activity and increased respiration rates. Compared to baseline and post-venting conditions,average methane concentrations increased from 0.46%during baseline conditions and 0.17%measured after venting to 0.66%. However, significant increases in methane concentrations only occurred in a single SVE point (SVE B3-S). Oxygen concentrations remained within previous ranges from baseline and post,-venting concentrations. The current average oxygen concentration from the wells were 8.13%compared with 11.33%after the piloting study and 7.86%during baseline conditions. Carbon dioxide concentrations increased slightly to 9.69%,up from 9.3%at baseline conditions and 6.3%measured after the piloting study. Carbon dioxide concentrations went up in six of the eight SVE points from the previous testing performed June 13, 2003. The increase in carbon dioxide levels indicate that the microbe populations within impacted soils at the Site are flourishing and that mineralization of petroleum hydrocarbons is occurring. With the introduction of nutrients and oxygen,the potential to increase mineralization rates is excellent. Results of the respiration analyses are included for reference in Appendix B. Imminent Hazard Evaluation During the reporting period, and throughout testing conducted over the past 16 months, all concentrations of EPH and VPH as well as all target analytes in downgradient monitoring wells have been consistently reported as at or below the applicable GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1 - Risk Characterization Standards. As such,no Substantial Release Migration or critical ingestion exposure to the Maher Well field,inhalation exposures to occupied buildings,or environmental impact to the downgradient wetlands is attributed to groundwater impact associated with the subject Site at this time. As such, there is neither.a condition of Imminent Hazard nor any Substantial Hazard at the siteindicated under current Site Conditions. However,increasing concentrations of TPH at centrally MARCH 8,2005 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE.5 OF 9 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT III located monitoring wells and increasing concentrations of fractional EPH at monitoring well GZA-1 shows that identified groundwater impact have not been significantly attenuating. As such, given that it appears unlikely that the Town will be proceeding with the eminent domain taking of the Hubbard properties, the implementation of more aggressive measures is proceeding as outlined in the Modification of the Remedy Implementation Plan as outlined in the following section of this report. PHASE IV MODIFIED REMEDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN As indicated in the Phase III Investigation (February 18, 2003), an active bioremediation system was selected as the preferred remedial alternative for the continued use of the facility for fuel oil storage and distribution,wherein the treatment of petroleum impacted soil and groundwater was projected as being able to meet a Class A, Response Action Outcome. As previously discussed, following the submission of the Phase III and Phase IV Investigations(June 23,2003),the Town of Barnstable announced the intended taking of the property and becoming the perspective owners, which may have substantially changed the perferred approach of the remedial response actions being conducted at the Site. Discussions between the Town of Barnstable and Hubbard.Oil were conducted in good faith to avoid substantial expenditures for the purchase of specified equipment, materials and construction related activities and to act in the interest of the purchaser. The Department was advised in writing of such activities and the effect such negotiations had on implementation of the selected remedial*alternative. During the course of such negotiations, BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.,did start the operation of a passive bioventing system with the use of the existing soil vapor points as equipped with wind driven turbine vents and conducted quarterly and semi-annual testing of downgradient and interior monitoring wells under the Remedial Operation Plan. Remedial Operation Plans Status (RODS) reports representing such operations, maintenance and environmental monitoring work,were filed in January and July 2004,as consistent with the requirements of 310 CMR 40.0893. At the insistence of counsel for Hubbard Oil Company,the Town of Barnstable has recently made a formal response that the Town now does not intend to take the property by its correspondence,dated February 3,2005.As such,this filing includes a Modification of the Remedy Implementation Plan to proceed with the construction of the active bioventing system and the reactive barrier as previously outlined. This work is scheduled to be undertaken within the next 45 days with the trenching of lines to the already purchased regenerative blower and the injection of some 10001bs of ORC in the area of documented groundwater impact at the downgradient property line. The following is a recap of the intended Phase IV activities for Remedy Implementation as previously set forth. Relevant Contacts and Organizational Structure The following is a flow diagram as representing the pertinent information and responsibilities associated with the Remedy Implementations Plan as of the date of this filing. MARCH 8,2005 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 6 OF 9 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT III HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC. RUBIN&RUDMAN,LLP. Evelyn Read,General Manager Robert Fasane Esquire P.O.Box 10-Hyannis,MA 02601 1-800-287-7103 50 Rowes Wharf-Boston,MA 02110 [Potentially Responsible Party] [Legal Counsel] BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. ENVI ROSAFE CORPORATION David C.Bennett,LSP.#4303 Heather Atwood,General Manager [LSP of Record] P.O.Box 810-East Sandwich,MA 02537 John Tadema-Wielandt,Project Manager 508-888-5478 P.O.Box 1667-Brewster,MA 02631 508-896-6630 [Environmental Contractor/Hazardous Waste Hauler] (Environmental/Engineering Consultant J ROBIE'S REFRIGERATION GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES John Robichaud,President Eric Jensen,Laboratory Director Gerhard Robichaud,Owner 228 Main Street-Buzzards Bay,MA 02533 279 Yarmouth Road-Hyannis,MA 02601 508-759-4441 508-775-3083 [Certified Analytical Laboratory] [Downgradient Property Owner] Bioremediation System Design Soil-Venting System Desig_rI:The soil venting system consists of three primary components as represented on the Site Plan RIP-2 entitled"...Remedy Implementation Plan"(Sheet 2 of 2),in Appendix A. These are: 1)the soil vapor extraction points,2)the regenerative blower, and 3) the granular activated carbon(GAC) off-gas treatment units. The soil vapor points consist of two couplets in each of the two delineated zones of contamination. SVE-Al S, D and SVE-A2 S,D are located in Zone A, and SVE-B3 S,D and SVE-B4 S,D are located in Zone B. The couplets include a shallow point and a deep point which are constructed of 2"PVC with#20 slot screen set at approximately-10 to-5 bgs(shallow)and-13 to-23'bgs (deep) as corresponding to the occurrence of the contaminated soil underlying the former area of the aboveground storage tanks. The 6" gravel packed points are grouted to the surface with access manholes to be provided. A two inch PVC line will be teed into these points and run to the regenerative blower with an access port provided at the top of the point. The regenerative blower unit is specified to provide 60 SCFM at 25" (water)vacuum. The Gast Model R411 ON-50 regenerative blower with 1 hp motor and explosion proof housing has been used in the pilot testing study and has demonstrated this performance capacity. The skid -mount unit is presently available for this application and requires plumbing from the blower to the vapor points and construction of the manifold and connection to the GAC unit(s). Upon installation, the blower will initially be set to extract at a rate of 40 SCFM from Zone A and 40 SCFM from Zone B by adjusting the throttle control valves. The GAC units will consist of two 200 lb.drums(Carbon Filtration System,Inc.VS-200 or equivalent) in series. MARCH 8,2005 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 7 OF 9 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT III Reactive Barrier:The remedial additive application will consist ofthe injection ofRegenesis ORC in slurry form (40% solids) to ten injection points 13' apart at the downgradient property line to create an oxygen barrier in order to treat on-site groundwater impact and eliminate the off-site migration of dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbons. Over the course of treatment,approximately 90-100 lbs of ORC+will be injected at each location with total of 1,000 pounds of ORC+use projected at the Site. The ORC injections will be performed by direct-push method and injected by the use of a grout pump. Soil moisture probes will be installed so that soil moisture can be monitored for optimal conditions. The soil vapor points offer the flexibility for the application of water and nutrients as may be required to sustain microbial activities, wherein the piping can be retro-fitted to accept a number of different remedial additives to enhance bio-remediation,in case a more aggressive approach or modification to the ROP is desired or a more remote injection of remedial additives is needed because of the Town's reuse of the surface area for parking lots or roadways. Currently, the removal of surficial soils and the installation of the engineered barrier are being reconsidered under a cost to benefit analysis as the residual petroleum impact is non-persistent and appears to be located at depths 3'below grade surface in an area isolated by locked chain link fencing area where children are not present. Furthermore,historic groundwater monitoring has not indicated substantial release migration as associated with the mobilization ofpetroleum compounds associated with rainfall infiltration as the Site. In the final consideration of such work, additional soil analysis will be conducted to represent current Site conditions and evaluate practical exposure risks at the present time. In the interim,the operation and performance of the bioventing system is unaffected. The final"As-Built"construction plans with a Phase IV Completion Statement will be filed in the 6-month ROPS report following the completion of construction activities as outlined above. These reports will include, "As Built" plans, field reports for daily work progress, inspection of construction, and documentation of environmental testing and field testing protocol as established within the QA/QC policies of BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.,and as previously represented in the ROPS-1 and ROPS-2 reports filed with the MA DEP. PHASE V: OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING The implementation schedule has been modified to reflect a time-line from the filing of this report at the MA DEP (SERO). Full system startup is proposed within 45-days. SVE Operation &Maintenance: Following the installation and full system startup, monthly site inspections will be conducted by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. At the time of inspection, the vacuum, pressure and flow gauges will be checked. The moisture trap will be emptied and remedial wastewater stored in a sealed DOT drum in the secured storage building. The particle filter will also be checked and cleaned or replaced as necessary. A photoionization detector will be used to record the TOV concentrations in the influent air and intermediate to the GAC MARCH 8,2005 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 8 OF 9 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT III units for evidence of breakthrough. The primary GAC unit will be replaced when intermediate breakthrough is indicated. Environmental Monitorin :,Soil Respiration analysis will be performed quarterly subsequent to the startup of the system as a measure of system performance. As respiration rates approach those of background concentrations, or at least on a six-month basis, test borings will be conducted for the qualification of soil treatment for EPH and/or VPH analysis as dependent on known contaminant source. This information will be compared against baseline testing in review of SVE performance and closure objectives. Soil samples will also be analyzed on a six- month basis for wet chemistry and bacteria counts to assure adequate nutrients to support indigenous bacteria populations and to qualify respiration rates for microbial activity. At the present time,access to the area of soil impact is restricted by perimeter fencing. Employees of Hubbard Oil have been advised of environmental hazards; and hence, critical exposure pathways are not complete at the present time. Environmental Monitoriniz: Groundwater Frequency of groundwater monitoring has previously been reduced based on a preponderance of historic quarterly data collected at downgradient monitoring wells wherein no significant groundwater impact is demonstrated intermediate to critical receptors and hence,no critical exposure pathways are complete as the basis ofNo Substantial Hazard. Bi- annual(May/November)groundwater monitoring of the downgradient perimeter monitoring wells GZA-1, GZA-2, MW-5 S/D and MW-6S, D and the most heavily impacted central'. monitoring wells SEA-1 and SEA-2 will be conducted for EPH and VPH analysis with target analytes as well as TPH analysis as a cost-saving measure. At the time remedial additives are in use, wet chemistry sampling will be conducted in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0046. Wet chemistry will include nitrate, total nitrogen, sulfate, iron, manganese,magnesium and total phosphorus. Annually(May),EDB and lead analysis will be conducted in the perimeter wells. All sampling will be accompanied by field measurements of dissolved oxygen,pH, conductivity and temperature. All information on the bioremediation system operation, maintenance and environmental monitoring will be recorded on the Inspectors Daily Record, Monitor Well Sampling Logs and or Respiration Logs as shown in the QA/QC Policies in Appendix G. The evaluation of system performance and/or environmental monitoring will be reported in the Phase V Remedy Operation Status Report following system startup with a Phase IV Completion Report and"As Built"plans in the six month filings as required. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION This Phase V ROS III report, specifies the implementation of the selected remedial alternative as consistent with the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan (6/23/03). The MARCH 8,2005 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC-BROOKS RD./B002-3490 PAGE 9 OF 9 PHASE V REMEDY OPERATION STATUS REPORT III implementation of the proposed bioremediation strategy was delayed pending response from the Town of Barnstable to substantive practical and financial issues regarding the previously announced taking of the property and proposed use of the property as a roadway and parking lot. With the recent written response of the Town of Barnstable abandoning such plans, Hubbard Oil is now prepared to proceed with such work and a Modification of the Remedy Implementation plan is presented. The respiration analysis performed under the ROS environmental monitoring indicates significant numbers of petroleum degraders are present as supported by the passive bioventing system that has been operated in lieu of the active system and reactive barrier,pending the resolve of the taking issues. Although no significant attenuation of petroleum impact to groundwater in the release area has been documented by such efforts, the testing of downgradient sentinel wells continued to document a condition of No Substantial Hazard under current conditions, with no indication of Substantial Release Migration or complete inhalation, ingestion or direct contact exposure pathways to identified human and environmental receptors. It is anticipated that the construction of the active bioventing system and installation of the reactive barrier with ORC injections will be completed within 45 days. It is also presumed that outstanding issues between the PRP and the Town of Barnstable will be resolved in the next reporting period. At this time BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. will revisit the removal of surficial soils and the installation of an engineered barrier. The LSP opinions represented by this report are established by the certifications made on the attached Comprehensive Response Action[BWSC-108] Transmittal Form. The LSP opinions are based upon available data and regulations in effect at the time of this reporting. Should you have any questions or require any further information,please contact me directly. inc ly, E T & ILLY, INC. avi nnett, LSP J hn D. a ema-W andt Director o n ' onmental Services P oject Manager encl. -Report entitled"Phase IV Remedy Operation Status Report III",Prepared by BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC., Dated March 8, 2005 -Comprehensive Response Action Transmittal Form,BWSC-108 (original) cc: Hubbard Oil, Inc. - Attn: Evelyn Read, General Manager Robert A. Fasanella, Esq. - RUBIN &RUDMAN, LLP Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department Thomas McKean- Barnstable Board of Health John Klimm-Barnstable Town Manager David Condry-Barnstable Water Company John Robichaud, Abutter-Robie's Refrigeration REMEDIAL OPERATION PLAN STATUS REPORT III SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN 4-0824/4-15370 Hubbard Oil Co., Inc. 33 & 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328,Parcel 125 & 126] Hyannis,MA. 02601 Project#B002-3490 MARCH 8,2005 Prepared BY BENNETT& O'REILLY,INC. 1573 Main Street P.O.Box 1667 Brewster,MA 02631 David C.Bennett,LSP. Prepared For: Mr. Gerard Martin,Chief Sites Management&Permitting Section,BWSC Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office(SERO) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup(BWSC)/Sites Management Program(SMP) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville,MA 02347 On Behalf Of; Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc. P.O.Box 10-Hyannis,MA 02601 Evelyn Read,General Manager APPENDIX A:Reference Plans -Site Plan:Comprehensive Response Actions,"Phase IV-Remedy Implementation Plan"(2 Sheets), Prepared by BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.,Dated April 24,2003 (rev. 3/3/05) -Figure 1: Site Locus Plan from USGS Topographic Quad.,Hyannis-Excerpt(TOPO 1998) -Figure 2: MA DEP BWSC GIS Map,Hyannis-Excerpt(MA DEP 9/29/00) -Figure 3: Water Table Contour Map Excerpt,Town of Barnstable, 1992 APPENDIX B: Field Reports —Field Inspection Reports: '#17(7/11/04)and#18(11/10/04) -Monitor Well Sampling Log: 11/10/04 -Respiration Analysis: 11/10/04 -Charts: Respiration Values- SVE points Al-S,Al-D,A2-S,A2-D,B3-S,B3-D, B4=S,B4-D APPENDIX C: Environmental Records -BWSC-108: Comprehensive Response Actions Transmittal Form -Memo from counsel to client regarding public records request(January 26,2005) -Request for Extension for Remedy Operation Status Report(January 28,2005) -Town of Barnstable Response to Land Taking Inquiry(February 3,2005) APPENDIX D: Laboratory Analysis -Groundwater Analytical: Report(dated 11/29/04) -Table 1: EPH analysis summary-Perimeter Wells -Table 2: VPH analysis summary-Perimeter Wells -Table 3: EPH analysis summary-Central Wells -Table 4:VPH analysis summary-Central Wells APPENDIX E: Quality Assurance/Quality Control - Site Health and Safety Plan APPENDIX A BarIIS'�ble, HISTORIC GROUNDWATER WELL GAUGING GROUNDWATER ELL GAUGING DATE: 10/02/02 TLME: 11:00AM TIDE: _.DATE: 11/10/04 THM: Reference Site Plan by SEA Consultants,Inc. M MA WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. S.W.L. PLOW VECTOR ME: Cambridge,MA Scale 1"=50' Q R Reference Site Plan for Robie'8 Refri eration °/ MW-1 48.84 28.14 20.70 S 52°E WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. I.W.L. FLOW VECTOR g \\a MW-2 48.84 28.13 20.71 (128°) RAO by Horsley& VWittenInc. d� "ad MW-3 48.08 26.60 21.48 MW-5S 38.99 19.18 6.81" Q LOCUS SEA-1 148.37 27.66 20.71 MWSD 38.94 18.00 0.94 46 a SEA-2 50.92 30.11 20.81 O SEA-3 51.60 30.70 20.90 MW-65 39.20 18.23 0.97 h DATE: 10l2302 TLME TIDE: MW-6D 39.20 18.21 A99 WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. S.W.L. FLOW VE,CrOR MW-1 48.84 28.16 20.68 S 62°E GZA-1 39.24 18.W .1.24 / (b hour Road' a MW-2 48.84 28,14 20.70 (118°) Q GZA-2 39.31 18.30 11.01 MW-3 48.08 26.67 21.41 MWa 49.50 28.74 2036 GZA-3 39.57 18.60 t0.97 SEA-1 48.37 27.68 20.69 SEA-2 50.92 30.11 120.81 SEA-1 48.37 26.74 21.63 / TYPICAL. a 3 KEY MAP SEA-3 51.60 30.73 20.87 SEA-2 50.92 29.16 21.76 / TEST BORING-MONITOR WELL HW-2 51.65 30.14 21.51 / RESERVED AS REQUIRED HW-3 50.01 28.48 21.53 / LEGEND GZA-2 39.31 19,16 20.15 / / / GZA-3 39.57 19.45 20.12 Ei CB Concrete Bound A Existing Monitor Well DATE: 11/04/02 TL[afE: TIDE: -2 f o Proposed Monitor Well WELL T.O.C. D.T,W. S.W.L. FLOW VECTOR GZA-1 39.24 19.11 20.13 S 49°E / Existing Test Boring MW-5S 38.99 19.21 19.78 (131°) Proposed Test Boring MW-5D 38.94 19.14 19.80 / 0 Proposed ORC Injection.Point MW-6S 39.20 19.35 19.85 fT1 ' W Area of Staining MW-6D 39.20 19.34 119.86 D Diesel DATE: 04/24/03 TLME: TIDE: GW Groundwater WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. S.W.L. FLAW VECTOR HW 3 A �� See(Sheet Details �a� � G�p A Gasoline GZA-2 39.31 16.03 23.28 1 (Sheet 2 of 2) _j� \t S>1-iA Installations by SEA Consultants,Inc. GZA-3 39.57 16.33 23.24 0 A 0�4 O j AST Aboveground Storage Tank MW-5S 38.99 15.90 23.09 mil) ��a �/ ! UST Underground Storage Tank MW-5D 38.94 15.81 23.13 Former Location -- (b J GZA GZA,Inc.,Consultants MW-6S 39,20 16.10 123.10 5 A5Ts(Diesel) OW Observation Well MW-6D 39.20 115.99 12321 g �C Removed 1986} Existing ® Area of Soil Impact>S3/GW-I @� / DATE: 10N9/03 TLYIE: TIDE: Steamship Authori Area of Groundwater Impact>GW 1 WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. S.W.L. FLOW VECTOR Monitor Wells O S.- TB-3 MW-5S 38.99 18.02 20.97 S 57 E 0 MW-5D 38.94 17.95 20.99 123° �Gt� MW-6S 39.20 18.17 21.03 \ " / MW-6D 39.20 18.15 21.05 I f All i O GZA-2 39.31 18.20 21.11 6NE „ � VVV GZA-3 39.57 18.52 21.05 G7A-1 39.24 117.89 21.35 OW-5 40.00 Dry NT DATE: 2/5/04 TEAR TIDE: all TB- DATE: ` �F WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. S.W.L. FLOW VECTOR HW- _ 2� MW-5S 38.99 17.05 21.94 S 62°E MW-5D 38.94 17.13 21.81 1:18, S Proposed MW l XlStin MW-6S 39.20 17.27 21.93 - MW-6D 139.20 17.25 21.95 / • 1 5p GZA-1 39.24 16.91 22.33 Former Location GZA-2 39.31 17.33 21.98 UST(Kerosene) MW-1 48.84 26.19 22.65 / -- rorl) MW-2 48.84 26.16 22.68 MW-3 48.08 24.52 23.56 �a'4� v •-- ___' -_ 6nstin - % MW 3 49.50 26.72 22.78 -Septic-Tank SEA-1 148.37 25.70 122.67 SEA-2 50.92 2s.o9 22.g3 \ \ ZO N ading Doc • � Exisf nq Sump( MW-3 D well (brl) CA Now or Formerly �ar� TB-10 loading Racks _ �. .-- �- • ----__ Gasoline <GW-() Concrete . Parking SEA ' t`vrnter I�ssatron � PLAN Kerosene) Scale 1"=4V Ga °'� emaVezi 995` SEA SB-1 -14 uel in -_ _. (Gasoline <GW I) (shallow Only) REVISED 3/3/05: Added well gauging and groundwater flow IDENTIFIED SOIL I VIPACT (>S-1/GW-1) TB-9 -�- ._,_.-� -` ;S, determinations for J 1/10/04 REVISED G/24/04: Added well gauging and groundwater flow ZONE"A" f65'L X 50V X 27D] If !f determinations for 2/5/04 ZONE C REVISED 1.2/19/03: Added well gauging and groundwater TB- 4: 3'-8' bgs(DIESEL) R IP-2 MW-1 (Diesel): � flow determinations for 10/09/03 TB-11: 3'-27'bgs(DIESEL) (Existing) Catch ,ga 1 PH > GW-1 (I 996-2000) q Catch® Fxisti Basin d, Project: Basin s NS ZONE"B" [65'L X 45V X 28D] / HUBBAR.D OIL COMPANY INC. p�j p Attu:Evelyn Read, P.O.Box 10,Hyannis,MA 02601 SEA-1(SB): l'-24'bgs(GASOLINE/DIESEL) (N TE R RU F D A Kf-A Of /SEA-SB-3: 1'-15'bg s(G DIESEL) Title* COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ONSE ACTIO N TB-6: 15'-28'bgs(GASOLINE) G FRQ U N D VATf-K JVPA PHASE IV-REMEDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MW 5 S&D 33&51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA-RTN 4-0824 ZONE"c" [151 X la-lsW x (DIESEL) sohne <GW I) l: �' bgs(D � (sha Only) BENNETT & 01-REILLY, INC. 0'- / ENGINEERING,ENVIRONMENTAL,&SURVEYING SERVICES / 1573 MAIN STREET,P.O.BOX 1667 / BREWSTER,MA 02361 PHONE:(508)896-6630 FAX:(508)$96.4687 [1/24/03 SCALEBY CHECK JOB NUMBER SHEET 1 C As Noted JJTW/e-JDCB IBM2-3490 BIO VENTING SYSTEM ZONE "All Scale 1"=4' Area of Soil Removal (50'x 65'x 3') Control Panel Presure Gauge Vent ----- S -2 ' 2" PVC Pipe Infiltration Trench (see detail) Carbon Filtration Systems Two VS-200 200 lb 200 lb E GAC GAC 1.0 HP S -1 Regenerative Dilution Valve Vacuum Gauge Blower To SVE Manifold GAST R4310P-50 Vacuum Release Valve —25 in water 0 60 SCFM Moisture Trap �� v O Particle Filter r 2" PVC Pipe O Measured Radii.of Influence ZONE E IIQII Area of 501I (Removal (45'x 65'x 3') SCHEMATIC BIO-VENTING COUPLET(typical) Not to Scale -3 S Deep Shallow "T" with inspection port Grade EL=0.0 Steel Manhole ----=2" PVC Pipe to SVE System Grout Grout Bentonite plug 5' Bentonite Plug #20 Slot Screen Gravel Pack Sand SCHEMATIC INFILTRATION TRENCH/ENGINEERED BARRIER Not to Scale 13' bgs 10' 0' bgs Clean Sand Moisture AS-BUILT SITE SKETCH PLAN —Probes 0.5,bgs ---40 mil HDPE liner Scale 1"=20' ---3/4" grovel FRIP-2 Project: • • • • • • • • • • • • _4" perforated PVC pipe #20 Slot Screen COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTIONS Grover Pack HUBBARD OIL CO., INC. 33 AND 51 BROOKS RD.,HYANNIS,MA 3 bgs v-: .. 4 Title: - SOIL VENTING TREATMENT SYSTEM Bottom of SVE Point 23' _ Groundwater P L PHASE IMPLEMENTATION P ---Natural materials MEDIAL IMPLEME :. : . . RTN 4-0824(RTN 4-13570) HUBBARD OIL CO.INC.,P.O.BOX 10,HYANNIS,MA,02601 . .. _ _ •. _ . .. BENNETT & O'REIILLY, INC. ENGINEERING,ENVIRONMF,NTAL,&SURVEYING SERVICES 1573 MAIN STREET,P.O.BOX 1667 BREWSTER,MA 02361 PHONE:(508)896-6630 FAX:(508)896-4687 DATE SCALE BY CHECK j1OBNU1*1BER SHEET 2 OF 2 6/20/03 As Noted I ELS DCB B002-3490 Hubbard Oil Co., Inc.-33 and 51 Brooks Road, Hyannis,MA 41040'15",70017-18" 41040'15", 7001544" 0 Go 61 ip G 3 Y-5 rave N% LOCUS JAL- ■ .' .r i JY Ca 'Q 41°39'06", 70°1 T 18" NAD83 41°39'06", 70015-44" MN TN 0 1/2 1 MILE 160 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000FEET Printed from TOPO! 01998 Wildflower Productions(www.topo.com) Figure 1: The subject properties are located at 33 and 51 Brooks Road in Hyannis, MA. The properties are located approximately 250 feet east of the intersection of Mary Dunn Road and Brooks Road in the Town of Hyannis, MA. The two parcels of land contain approximately 0.71 and 0.67 acres of land,respectively,with frontage along Brooks Road. The Barnstable Registry of Deeds lists the owner of record for both parcels as B&A Fournier Realty,Inc. The parcels are identified on the Town of Hyannis Assessors' Map 328 as Parcels 126 and 125, respectively. \►1\ 1 ►1 1"►�►►Vi�1►1�►11�a,: 1�;n u1��1? �001\1\1\1�N11\nlwt M''�►1: E�o1\11�S1111 111 �:�1 �11�� e 11 11►►\ d i►►• i,y� t\ 1� \� \�11`�:►�'S?t ii L\a1 l� 1 \1 11 1\�•1\11\I'+ 11:►\. 1 ►\\\►,;►\.►►.\.u►1. \ 1 ti\\�11\\Iioo\off\o1e1o!!owe, aiae11M11U1\N111 'Nl�►�K �>i :� �1;\ \ij1,o11�1 1►�Nb�►1��;4 io;N ,o1\\,1ni0 :\����'1.'!t' @Jl,hllo;�olsNo��►�1..ra.1•� ..�;.\1111�,�\1111\11\y111,1`R„��\����'� 1�11\i1\11\u\1i�4!. INN, ,►buy l �1�►►,.�.,1��1\�Rj��ol�q, ►i'►i�iol�j\1o 'n�1 0\looli�11o11�'a;M4 F4 �\►i11��1 \11\I1\i:\1'i5ba;0'71 a};.... ,q,o.''i, \y��, \11111\ltha• 1� �e�11i11���111\1\�!\N\1111111 11 1,1►�„ •1i11 �� i1,�1�4 a',1 '►==l1::\ii�1111\�t1,1\,il\;o1 1�p��ip6a: �i,�1 �5 � 111,1oP-01\I 1!!}lii!►'.11N11� iii: ik'��1� ��+► t 11�� i`� \� 1111\11mmi,N�►o11%1 \i�, �► ��C h �i�i► ►��p�,���11�1�i 1 1Aio1►4 ;11►;►111;ii� ��►!A. E q1 ���:'�1�11�,\ i\��1o01 11�1�►►0 1�� \t� `1�►i1.`�R!1`L\1►i1 t1 11 111+ 1 ':'''liR•tt . 1 1 1 1 . ►.. , \ 1 1 1 IN 11 %, it 1!1 nsl � ,�!1\ ►1 1 �' \� RV I`►1'11,�1111N�1;%M%M I'M 11 11\\,�..1h \1\ ► r i �, Mi•11�►, �+�® 1, 1► !�'f.\� 111\►115,gi\\1 \,�1111\\1\q\ 11 10 111 t11 .�11tU'k�N!'. �!�.+,+��•►►. �I.;1 t \t ,1 ►. 1 ►. t 11 11 \11\1 11 �1,1! 1,11�1o�1N1y�;\i!, :� ,,. �i'1 ' ++ _'jA " 1N1\"11bU--J \►!.11 \1111t`1!i'i+1\ \ 1t►1\ 111t O,r�, ,�►.. 11 11►. ice ► ++ i,1►.� i►t11 \>> ►.\ i!,�11 \I 11 11 11, 1i 11 11 t 1\11\i �►►a .u1!►\tt 11111\,` ►► s*+ \\ �' < ��,t1 1\ N 11 11t 11 111 11 � �. �'��1�►\p1:�1��\!i�„�n►4'111\\1\►`'rr,� �` ���_ t���R ����1�11 ►.� 11 11 1\ 1\ 11 1\ 1\ 1 ��.;M:'-� 1\. „ - ,,.►i�.,.-;�. ,t►\11 fly► .z►i n ��ti � .h\ 1\ \1.11 11 11 11 11 11\ \t1►1\\ 1�:' `� �h�a0!1;'Ipi.uu! �t\�,},►t�,��r�,., y,�. �y:6�'��jr,..,. ,y\t 1\1111►,��1\i1\11\11\11\11\1\4.11► i \;!�, � \ �` ��++ � � i 1\I�1�\,j1\��q�11\i oi1� 11�o\ii�►,ii1,\1 i t'� : ►aj�'M ++ �'R��:. � a1 \ 1 t\•11 i1 11 \1 1\ 11 1\I i1 li1 11 1, ?t,�►,�� .It;�►a� �� .,.► �\•1t�1111�i•.,1NIN1t11\11111\11111\1\t,1\11 �\. .►\ .u� .t. �� � �1 1\►11h1��N1\11111p11111\11i11\�11111\111 *. .• �•I•q,�►' �+ � �\1�,•11• \.11►1111\111g1111111 �.� \ 1 . 11 �..a.1t 1\.1 ��' '► �,�.11 r,1 11 11 i1 11 11►u\.►\.►11..►,\; \11�11 � + `\!'t11�\�1��t�.1�►�,1,Ii��1��1�i1�o!11��10\\01101\01 4 � j 1t \■ry1 1,\ N N 1.n\�►1�►-1\: .1�1.�1\,,►1► e. '!.. �\11���IN1Ny1\11\11\1.�•�.\1.,�1��111►uhu► ���� ►1 1 ►";1 11 11 \\ 11 11"1�.\..11 \1 , � ►t< !1\U\1'��1141►111►1\►11: i• t1,':.`�\t! 0� �'' � �i� kk►\ �1 1 11�\,�►t:•\1c►1�1►1: �� v,l.�,1 ��J 1 + \st 3 i141\\ 1\ 1 1111�,�\;11:n1.Rn .R,.•1�\\iy? 1\1\\I1\it1b,11t I\e.►►a�lE,fE�O\.50 . '►.lq \� � � 4 1 1 \\ "� ► i e, ��►`�+' 'i►\�• , ,�� `�,$;0'_;��•y �"►,y.� \1;1�\10\11\1i�t\;,.�1!• r�ir: t 1\`,11,. .� �_+��,+.+�1�►��1it, ;.: .. j1 \1 i1 11r 11 11►►'r.l ,.171� .11 .. 7 ►!•°ui. ��.i��,\1►1\►i1\11h1111.� t..�!4�1.�����II''��1ii. i, r� 1► �,,��, o� "!e►1�: o_-• \tit,i.�.��►,i\y111►\+,1\1? 111, L ; ' ,�n,, i�ryliply� a .F ��r11\,i• _� ►t ,Tre► n� ;11\1►=►htl.ZA -01 `t 'ar OVA 1.7,• „ . %' � a.�+b1h 1�i1.►i. �` i _ �� n '�\p 1•III III►►.� � 1► ,., _ •, ► 11 ,r�rt. i u 1 � 1 ' ` •. 1 i it •,� r,t o-- � APPENDIX B BENNETT & O'REILLY Inc. REPORT NUMBER: F17 1573 Main Street: 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster, MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: B002-3490 Date: 7/11/04 Job Name: Hubbard Oil Feature: Remedy Operation Plan Status Contractor: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Type of Work: Install Turbine Vents Weather Conditions: Windy,sunny • Temperature: 750F 'ontractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) Sennett&O'Reilly,Inc. :Scott Kraihanzel(ES n quipment in use or idled(identify which) cord F-150,HnU PID(in use) faterials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed x 2"-4"couples x 2"90°angles on-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies one mmary of construction activities 0 Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc.personnel leaving the office and heading to Snow and Jones in South Yarmouth for adaptor parts for the system. :00 Arrive on-site. Begin installation. -00 Installation complete,heading back to the office. 15 Leaving office for the Site to conduct PID screening. 5 Leaving the Site. int PID reading 23.5 11.5 13.5 BENNETT & O'REILLY Inc. REPORT NUMBER: 18 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster, MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: B002-3490 Date: 11/10/04 Job Name: Hubbard Oil Co.Inc. Feature: Remedy Operation Status Contractor: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Type of Work: Bi-Annual Groundwater Sampling,Respiration Analysis Weather Conditions: Partly cloudy,cold Temperature: 39°F 'ontractor's Work Force(Indicate classification, including Subcontractor personnel) 3ennett&O'Reilly,Inc. :John Tadema-Wielandt,ES 11;Samantha Westgate,ET quipment in use or idled(identify which) Water level indicator,whale pump,YSI multi-meter,Land Tech GA-90 gas meter,air pump(in use),SVE system and negative blower(idle), arbine vents(in use). Iaterials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed ample 6 wells for EPH/VPH 3 dolphin locks ample 2 wells for TPH Jon-conforming materials or work, field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies one ummary of construction activities �30 Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc.personnel arrive at downgradient Robies Refrigeration Property for bi-annual groundwater sampling. Begin uging selected wells for groundwater flow direction and to calculate purge volumes. 00 Complete gauging at Robies property. Begin sampling downgradient wells. I00 Complete sampling at downgradient Robies property. Pack up. 05 Break for lunch. �i5 Return from lunch. Arrive at Hubbard property. Gauge and purge selected MWs. Begin respiration analysis at SVE points with Land L.ch GA-90 gas meter. 45 Complete groundwater sampling at Hubbard property. Continue respiration analysis. 45 Complete respiration analysis indicating excellent microbial activity. Swap turbine vents to alternate points. 0 Depart Site. BENNETT & 0"REILLY, Inc. MONITOR WELL SAMPLING LOG 1573 Main Street, P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 Engineering and Environmental Services (508)896-6630 FAX(508)896-4687 CLIENT Hubbard Oil Co. Inc. DATE(S) 11/10/04 TEME: TIDE: LOCATION 33&51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA JOB NUMBER B002-3490 SAMPLER JohnTadema-Wielandt, Samantha Westgate MEASURING POINT GROUND SURFACE OR T.O.C: T.O.C. Elev.of Total Standing Water Depth to Static Volume HNU Dissolved Well reference Depth Water Table Conductivity Temperature Number point of Well Water Height Elevation Volume Purged PI-101 pH Oxygen (F) Comments: (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (gallons) (gallons) (ppm) (mg/L) GZA-1 39.24 77 18.00 59 21.24 10.03 28.5 NT 5.58 2.66 89 56 Sulfur Odor/No Sheen GZA-2 39.31 28.7 18.30 10.40 21.01 1.77 5.5 NT 5.22 7.81 100 57 No Odor/No Sheen GZA-3 39.5.7 29 18.60 10.40 20.97 1.77 NA NT NA NA NA NA Gauge only MW-5S 38.99 28 18.18 9.82 20.81 1.67 5.0 NT 5.71 7.27 131 55 No Odor/No Sheen MW-5D 38.94 51 18.00 33.00 20.94 5.61 16.0 NT 5.53 2.16 106 58 No Odor/No Sheen MW-6S 39.20 28 18.23 9.77 20.97 1.66 5.0 NT 5.53 4.35 254 56 No Odor/No Sheen MW-6D 39.20 51 18.21 32.79 20.99 5.60 16.0 NT 5.37 9.10 46 58 No Odor/No Sheen SEA-1 48.37 32 26.74 5.26 21.63 0.89 3 NT 5.22 3.75 261 46 Strong Petroleum Odor/Slight Sheen SEA-2 50.92 1 32.25 29.16 3.09 21.76 0.53 1.5 NT 5.26 3.59 205 53 Strong Petroleum Odor/Slight Sheen NOTES: Sample 6 wells for EPHNPH Sample 2 wells for TPH 1573 Main Street,P.O.Box 1667 BENNETT & GREILLY, Inc. Brewster,MA 02631 Engineering and Environmental Services (508) 896-6630 MONFOR WELL SAMPLING LOG RESPIRATION ANALYSIS CLIENT Hubbard Oil Co., Inc. DATE(S) 11/10/04 LOCATION 33 & 51 Brooks Rd., Hyannis JOB # B002-3490 S AMPLER John Tadema-Wielandt, Samantha Westgate Well Number Total Approx. Standing Length HNU Methane Oxygen Carbon Comments: Depth of Depth to Water of screen PI-101 (%CH,) (%O,) Dioxide SVE Well Water Height above (ppm) (%CO,) Screen Interval (feet) (feet) (feet) SWL Al-S 10' 28' NA NA NT 0 20.2 0.5 5-10' Al-D 23' 28' NA NA NT 0.4 0.6 16.1 13-23' A2-S 10' 28' NA NA NT 0 9.7 8.0 5-10' A2-D 23' 28' NA NA NT 0 11.2 6.9 13-23' B3-S 10' 28' NA NA NT 4.0 0.9 15.6 5-10' B3-D 23' 28' NA NA NT 0.3 9.3 7.5 13-23' 134-S 10' 28' NA NA NT 0 11.5 7.5 5-10' 134-1) 23' 28' NA NA NT 0.6 1.6 15.4 13-23' NOTES: Respiration Values SVE Al-S 25 -- 20 = 15 o 0 Methane(%CH4) La Oxygen (%02) U12.4 -.6-Carbon Dioxide (%CO2) c x—TOVs (Ppm) U 10 7.8 5 W-4.1 .5 0 6/10/2003 6/13/2003 11/10/2004 Date Respiration Values SVE AI-D 60 50 4 U -- w +,r c - c -0 Methane(%CH4) c �___ �—Oxygen (%W) 30 —b--Carbon Dioxide(%CO2) c -TOVs (ppm) U 20 -. 16.1 10 1 9.4 -9 72 0 9.4 6/10/2003 6/13/2003 11/10/2004 Date Respiration Values SVE A2-S 18 -- - - - --- - 16 � 14 12 .° 10 \ Methane (%CH4) 9.2 9.7 Oxygen (%02) 6—Carbon Uin;Adi? (%C:i 0). 0 8 - TOVs(ppm) v 7.5 4 2 0 6/10/2003 6/13/2003 11/10/2004 Date Respiration Values SVE A2-1) 25 - ---- ---- - - - - - 20 17.9 169 c Methane (%CH4) —�-OxygPn (%02) d —a—Carbon Dioxide (%CO2) c 11.2 -TOVs(ppm) t� 10 6.9 5 1.4 0 3 6/10/2003 6/13/2003 11/10/2004 Date Respiration Values SVE 133-S 180 160 140 120 ° - Methane(%CH4) = 100 f Oxygen (%02) m —e—Carbon Dioxide (%CO2) 0 TOVs(ppm) 80 60 i 40 20 _. 12 4 r 15}6 0 6/10/2003 6/13/2003 11/10/2004 Date Respiration Values SVE 133-13 90 80 �g 70 - 60 c / , 50 _ -i—Methane (%CW4) --*—Oxygen (%02) c —6—Carbon Dioxide(%CO2) 0 40 - TOVs(ppm) U 30 - z 20 16 3 10 '86 2i3 0 6/10/2003 6/13/2003 11/10/2004 Date Respiration Values SVE 134-S 35 -- - - - -- - -- -- - - - 30 25 0 20 - Methane(%CH4) -f-Oxygen (%02) -- -b-Carbon Dioxide(%CO2) c X TOVs(ppm) U. 15 WIT 7 11.5 10 7.5 .1 ,51 5 34 6/10/2003 6/13/2003 11/10/2004 Date Respiration Values SVE 13-413 28.5 25 _. 20 —0 Methane (%CH4) 15.4 - 0—OxYgen (%02) 15 �14.1 --n—Carbori Dioxide ("ioCO2) c / �� —TOVs(ppm) 10 / 4 X 8.1 7.2 5 4.3 6/10/2003 6/13/2003 11/10/2004 Date APPENDIX C Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC108 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking Number FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT ® 824 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40:0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) A- SITE LOCATION: 1. Site Name: Hubbard Oil Co., Inc. 2. Street Address: 33 and 51 Brooks Road 3. Cityrrown: Hyannis 4. ZIP Code: 02601-0000 5. Check here if a Tier Classification Submittal has been provided to DEP for this disposal site. Fla. Tier IA [] b. Tier IB [2 c. Tier IC d. Tier II 6. If applicable, provide the Permit Number: 31003452 B.THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO: (check all that apply) ❑ 1. Submit a Phase I Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484. ❑ 2. Submit a Revised Phase I Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484. 3. Submit a Phase II Scope of Work,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0834. D4. Submit an interim Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Report pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0835 (An interim Phase II Report does not satisfy the response action deadline requirements in 310 CMR 40.0500). 5.Submit a final Phase II Comprehensive Site Report and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0836. Specify the outcome of the Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment: (check one) a. Comprehensive Remedial Actions are necessary at the site to achieve a Response Action Outcome. A Phase III study for the identification,evaluation,and selection of Comprehensive Remedial Action Alternatives;pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0850,•is necessary. b. The requirements of a Class A Response Action Outcome have been met,and a completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. c. The requirements of a Class B Response Action Outcome have been met and a completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. 6.Submit a Revised Phase II Comprehensive Site Report and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0836. 7. Submit a Phase III Remedial Action Plan and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0862. 8. Submit a Revised Phase III Remedial Action Plan and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0862. 9. Submit a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0874. 10. Submit a Modified Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0874. 11. Submit an As-Built Construction Report,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0875. (All sections of this transmittal form must be filled out unless otherwise noted above) Revised: 12/09/2003 Page 1 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108 COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking Number FORM& PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) B.THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO(cont): (check all that apply) ❑ 12. Submit a Phase IV Final Inspection Report and Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0878 and 40.0879. Specify the outcome of Phase IV activities:(check one) a. Phase V Operation, Maintenance or Monitoring of the Comprehensive Remedial Action is necessary to achieve a Response Action Outcome. b. The requirements of a Class A Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation,Maintenance or Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. c. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation,Maintenance or Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. d. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. Further Operation,Maintenance or Monitoring of the remedial action is necessary to ensure that conditions are maintained and that further progress is made toward a Permanent Solution. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report (BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. ❑ 13. Submit a Revised Phase IV Final Inspection Report and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0878 and 40.0879. 14. Submit a periodic Phase V Inspection&Monitoring Report,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0892. Q 15. Submit a Remedy Operation Status,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893. 16. Submit a Termination of a Remedy Operation Status,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(5). 17. Submit a final Phase V Inspection&Monitoring Report and Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0894. Specify the outcome of Phase V activities: (check one) a. The requirements of a Class A Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation,Maintenance or Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. b. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation,Maintenance or Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. c. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. Further Operation,Maintenance or DMonitoring of the remedial action is necessary to ensure that conditions are maintained and/or that further progress is made toward a Permanent Solution. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report(BWSC104)will be submitted to DEP. 0 18. Submit a Revised Phase V Inspection&Monitoring Report and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0894. Q 19. Submit a Post-Response Action Outcome Inspection&Monitoring Report,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0897. (All sections of this transmittal form must be filled out unless otherwise noted above) Revised: 12/09/2003 Page 2 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108 COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking Number FORM$ PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) C. LSP SIGNATURE AND STAMP: I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with this transmittal form, including any and all documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based upon application of(i)the standard of care in 309 CMR 4.02(1),(ii)the applicable provisions of 309 CMR 4.02(2)and(3),and 309 CMR 4.03(2),and (iii)the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(3),to the best of my knowledge,information and belief, > if Section B indicates that a Phase I,Phase It,Phase Ill,Phase IV or Phase V Completion Statement is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(i)has(have)been developed and implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,and(iii) comply(ies)with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals identified in this submittal; > if Section B indicates that a Phase H Scope of Work or a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(i)has(have)been developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such. response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,and(iii)comply(ies)with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals identified in this submittal; > if Section B indicates that an As-Built Construction Report,Phase V Inspection and Monitoring Report,or a Remedy Operation Status is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(i)is(are)being implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,and(iii)comply(ies)with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals identified in this submittal. I am aware that significant penalties may result,including,but not limited to,possible fines and imprisonment,if I submit information which I know to be false,inaccurate or materially incomplete. 1. LSP#: 4303 2. First Name: David 3. Last Name: Bennett 4. Telephone: ( 08) - 0 5. Ext.: 102 s FAX: (508) 896-4687 7. Signature: F rhA9 8. Date: `�'9i � 9.LSP Stamp: o ��+! a; (mm/ d/ ) v BENNE' - P Nlo.4303 �f; y 4 sie �G� s�1 O O�•e,; SITE -J Revised: 12/09/2003 Page 3 of 5 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 71 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108 COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking Number FORM& PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) D. PERSON UNDERTAKING RESPONSE ACTIONS: 1. Check all that apply: El a.change in contact name b.change of address c. change in the person undertaking response actions 2. Name of Organization: Hubbard Oil Co., Inc. 3. Contact First Name: Evelyn 4. Last Name: Read 5. Street: P.O. Box 10 6.Title: General Manager 7. City/town: Hyannis MA 02601-0000 8. State: 9. ZIP Code: - 10. Telephone: (508) 7753711 11. Ext.: 12. FAX: 508 778-9403 E. RELATIONSHIP TO SITE OF PERSON UNDERTAKING RESPONSE ACTIONS: Q1. RP or PRP © a. Owner Q b. Operator 0 c. Generator d. Transporter e. Other RP or PRP Specify: 2. Fiduciary,Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status(as defined by M.G.L.c.21 E,s.2) 3. Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way(as defined by M.G.L.c.21 E,s.50)) 4. Any Other Person Undertaking Response Actions Specify Relationship: F. REQUIRED ATTACHMENT AND SUBMITTALS: 1. Check here if the Response Action(s)on which this opinion is based, if any,are(were)subject to any order(s), permit(s) EJ and/or approval(s)issued by DEP or EPA. If the box is checked,you MUST attach a statement identifying the applicable provisions thereof. a2. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the submittal of any Phase Reports to DEP. 4 ❑ 3. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the availability of a Phase III Remedial Action Plan. 0 4. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the availability of a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan. © 5. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of any field work involving the implementation of a Phase IV Remedial Action. o6. Check here if any non-updatable information provided on this form is incorrect,e.g.Site Name. Send corrections to the DEP Regional Office. © 7. Check here to certify that the LSP Opinion containing the material facts,data,and other information is attached. Revised: 12/09/2003 Page 4 of 5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC108 COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking Number FORM& PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT ® - 824 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) G. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON UNDERTAKING RESPONSE ACTIONS: 1. I, Evelyn Read attest under the pains and penalties of perjury(i)that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal,including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form, (ii)that,based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information,the material information contained in this submittal is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate and complete,and(iii) that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the entity legally responsible for this submittal. I/the person or entity on whose behalf this submittal is made am/is aware that there are significant penalties, including,but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment,for willfully submitting false,inaccurate,or incomplete information. 2. By: 3. Title: General Manager Signature 4. For. Hubbard Oil Co., Inc. 5. Date: (Name of person or entity recorded in Section D) (mm/dd/yyyy) 6. Check here if the address of the person providing certification is different from address recorded in Section D. 7. Street: 8. City/Town: 9. State: 10. ZIP Code: 11. Telephone: 12.Ext.: 13. FAX: YOU MUST LEGIBLY COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THIS FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMENT AS INCOMPLETE. IF YOU SUBMIT AN INCOMPLETE FORM,YOU MAY BE PENALIZED FOR MISSING A REQUIRED DEADLINE. Date Stamp(DEP USE ONLY:) Revised: 12/09/2003 Page 5 of 5 y PRIVILEGED/CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT REN JAN 2 8 2005 RUBIN AND RUDMAN LLP COUNSELLORS AT LAW 50 ROWES WHARF • BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02110-3319 TELEPHONE: (617)330-7000 • FACSIMILE: (617)439-9556 • EMAIL: FIRM@RUBINRUDMAN.COM MEMORANDUM To: Evelyn Read, General Manager, Hubbard Oil Bert Fournier, Owner, Hubbard Oil and Fournier,Petroleum From: Robert Fasanella, Esq. and Keren Schlomy, Esq. cc. David Bennett, LSP, Bennett & O'Reilly Env. Inc. Re: Update on Public Records Requests and Recommendations as to Next Steps 33 & 51 Brooks Road, Hyannis, MA Date: January 26, 2005 This memorandum supplements our memoranda of December 16, 2004 and December 21, 2004 regarding the results of our inquiries with the Town of Barnstable and the Airport Commission concerning the Fournier properties. As you know, there is past correspondence in our possession, from Special Town Counsel Barbara Harris, dated May 7, 2003, in the form of a notice indicating that the Town had an interest in acquiring your properties, located at 33 and 51 Brooks Road, (the "Terminal Properties") in Hyannis, which states that "the Town of Barnstable intends to acquire the [properties] for the purpose of constructing an access road and parking lots." Subsequently, on July 17, 2003, the Barnstable Town Council convened a formal public hearing to discuss and formally vote on the decision to exercise its power of eminent domain to take the Terminal Properties to use as a intermodal parking facility for the Hyannis ferry and as an additional runway safety area for the Barnstable Municipal Airport (the Barnstable Unified Transportation and Parking System Project, or"BUTAPS"). We have enclosed colored handouts that were distributed by the Town consultants Edwards and Kelcey the night of the public hearing, as Attachment 1 hereto. A presentation was made which included the history of the project including slide shows and a power point description of the process and area to be taken. On that night we learned that the project modifications, including a creation of a trailer parking area and relocation of the service roadway(Mary Dunn Road), had been planned to pass directly through the Terminal Properties (See enclosures). The Town Council of Barnstable voted unanimously to appropriate sufficient funds the acquire your and other surrounding properties at the end of the Airport. We have also enclosed as Attachment 2 hereto the Notice of the Pubic Hearing and Motion approved by a 11-0 vote by the Town Council entitled, "Appropriation of a 626951_4 PRIVILEGED/CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT RUBIN AND RUDMAN LLP Loan for the Construction, including Acquisition of the Land of a Barnstable Unified Transportation Parking System Order, 2003-099 appropriated under Item No. 98-054." We have letters which document a meeting with several town officials including the Director of Public Works, Assistant Town Manager, Town Counsel and Special Town Counsel, and consultants from Horseley & Witten, who were hired to evaluate the plans to take over your property and continue the remediation begun on the Terminal Properties. We continued to ask them when they intended to take your property, whether they would assume liability for the clean-up begun by you, how they would assist with relocation, how much they would give you for relocation and when you would have to make arrangement to leave. The Town even hired a relocation specialist to evaluate the cost of relocations and methods to achieve the relocation. The Town also hired an appraiser to estimate the fair market value of your property to award you in an eminent domain proceeding. All of these documents exist and many should be public records. The Town in fact bought many of the properties surrounding your Terminal properties and has partially constructed the intermodal parking facilities. Nevertheless, recently Town Counsels Harris and Bob Smith stated in phone conversations with Kerry Schlomy in December, 2004, that the Town was now likely not interested in buying the Fournier properties for the BUTAPS project, although they left open the possibility that the properties might still be needed in the future to straighten out the road. In fact, that is consistent with a recent Environmental Notification Form ("ENF") that the Nantucket Steamship Authority has filed an with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Office for a parking lot on other property. The ENF states that the Town has decided that it will not be building the BUTAPS facility. The ENF is enclosed as Attachment 3 hereto. Per our conversation with you we have placed calls to.Counsel Smith and left messages asking that he put in writing that (1) The Town is not going forward with BUTAPS and (2) the Town has no interest in acquiring the Fournier properties in the foreseeable future. Assistant Town Attorney T. David Houghton has said that he will talk to Counsels Smith and Harris about drafting a letter. Concerning whether the Terminal Properties might be taken for use by the Airport, we spoke with Airport Manager Doc Mosby, who stated that the Barnstable Airport Commission has no plan to take the Forunier properties at this time or in the foreseeable future (the next five years). He noted that given the location of the property in relation to the runway, however, if Mr. Fournier wants to sell the property he would recommend to the Federal Aviation Authority that the Airport be granted funds to purchase it. Given that the uncertainties associated with the properties with respect to potential takings would likely adversely impact your ability to improve or sell the properties (such as to your tenant) for a fair price we recommended in our prior memoranda taking action to get the Town and the Airport Commission to provide greater certainty as to the status of the properties. In response to our public records requests, the Town Counsels and the Airport Commission stated that there were no records in their possession relating to the Town's or Commission's interest in acquiring the properties. Copies of those responses are enclosed as Attachment 4. We find these responses incredulous and a patent failure to disclose under the Massachusetts and Federal public records 626951_4 2 PRIVILEGED/CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT RUBIN AND RUDMAN LLP statutes. We are sending one additional request to the Town Clerk, as Keeper of the Town Records. We have enclosed a copy of the new request as Attachment 5. At this point you have several options, including the following: 1. Continue to operate the business as before. 2. Try to sell the properties on your own and determine whether you can get a similar offer to the prior lease with and option to purchase offer you had in 2003. 3. Send a request to the Airport Commission asking that they purchase the properties, including payment of relocation costs, and asking that they recommend to the FAA that funds be appropriated to purchase them. We can draft such a letter. 4. If you are unable to sell the properties due to uncertainty about property status, you may want to consider having us send a Demand Letter/Notice of Claim to the Town alleging that the Town has made a de facto regulatory taking (i.e. that the property is worthless) and that the town must compensate you for it. If you are able to get an offer but it is lower than the prior offer, you may want to allege that the Town has interfered with contractual relations and request compensation for loss of income, sales, and attorney fees. In such a case damages would include: • The difference in price between the prior offers for the properties ($650,000) plus $24,000 in rent for 24 months of rent that the Buyer offered to pay during the lease/option period and the best offer you receive (assuming that number is negative); • Attorneys fees expended in dealing with the Town and the Commission on issues i regarding the taking (approximately$16,000); and • Any lost sales that can be attributed to the property being in limbo, awaiting being taken. Please let us know how you would like to proceed. 626951_4 3 Source Data: Data compiled from the following source: MassGIS,Commonwealth of Massachusetts EOEA USGS Quadrangle Images: December 1995 dz� Hyannis Quad: 1974/1979 r b f r r'Of Clk KV `." J��`<e 01�' U-• � ...„.:r�- �e� WJ � Zr \ .J- L;i-, � -%s (may ! A -�. �' >� ,� .:< L �u�j ! t'! p ['s.1. { \5.�41�• >! 1t ',,, o t a Y t I-��-Z° - C� i, � � r � ��,•cvti� �>�3r /t ir��� p,� � +r�p�a b��. / �. 4r ; _� v � ^}�, •f, �! n 1,. Z' T+.. a Lr r f��LYl ���.�.. ,��r`'k-�G ROWIIz �• ,�. •. e r '�;t QY2 5 7 �+'r\ "( „ l•Ym�, r r s��:,,'� �•g Jy o-y � 1��- ! J.:� O y l t� V'3i �_ p }�5k•,YiL\ljl� �a`y jrh.�d�� '�,"?J.�In hf"ys i �.. C`0.�ps:�`� (. ''� n7,. t aJ t�� GS' � L c ! - ��i C yF 1 �rY;.( ! �t'`T'4/1�.. Qw�'•.r�'',� :�•1Ut L n" V 71 1 St a 9s ' ( 3o s z ass a,i�� C3� 1 ;✓ (� f� of a x� y ! 1 N-e ar'3h d r 3 / ! a f r SF Xt �{� 7' fr',F�- - % t`f,�p`�. 4s3.•} y,--f s s �' F 1.-•a,�� r C .�[ a, �'' Ts C +� ?t.+t�!'oJS'� r ., t 1"•'t.. x i�T� Y l \.. v.,y a .c r u i L r� ; ar(\ l e !u. , , 1 -, o/ *.. - .f + .•rnr� ` - ir-} '�' ii �s'a,'..tom T•'.5. .r..r�t�h �,rl�+.,'�` 1WINxg . 1'" a:• ��.::�rl. d:? (�, 'Xtl � �'... �:5i t . .i'S" �a._,y. ter, `� A�I.-.�: r c � ! `" +�` . i°iF s�:�� l n E:f. •.,��.-''.: +• ...eats:: 1 ::>~rah •`,_..,�--',_--"'"' � i -s"-"�: � Y!• .i Y -��:. ! �: ��''� '� ✓� :1}. f5 a t10 _ f TL% m y7 1 ..•,.:Io :/�i i / P:' e �f�^- •��;Lrts c�3 J'f`' `--4' /, ' S,gya ,, 10-^�.s 4r J ~• ..; I D f' .�.•e`/ L �7 0 / '.R "kr�r t {.',,,''r �d ! �!•�. •! .* ,•nr, •=s.•j, J �R.`,If-•.i lfEf'' Ed i,�{.x'`��'. MR, n 4 /i /r / • r�iK .` �� d z 7 .�• k a i^.Yl!r }� .. B� " AYIyt�� s er 1 B �r�- ram• rl;-1': 1 ^ .:�1��(,�L '— f� \• I/ tJl—lJ Mvr •� I(��� \ `\ • / 1,q`� ( to 4 V.16 F_.,..'. . �Ell, El� ✓j t f o �' • t >� � INTERMODAL � `� !a :-r� `•. I �(� �� .� _ `...;1�-=� ��.� PARKING rr �ti�p_ �,,, � /Water, •,V•, z 1 f8t5rQ4� FACILITY ! . .• .Y s i � Y �<A'�(T'� ! f --t ��'✓ -1 O l9.�?ryr l�>f �' `w+ !� � � r '' �•�+.(/!;I•` ^�!:-�•`R-�"'G� t9j�rt "^"s- "rzl �I! ��a„a a f��li/`yiP"tveV4zx� .D/ :I--`a ` � s� • - -.! � • �(�'`�, '•�-_�'� s--F��:•a C-'��"e, �.s 1 h. - ��"3::::1=6 •}.:-�'a: ,. r '�• "'�t�`,c' e�>_• <w A �' tz �':� I' N �r21� cr `if �o < <�e �. ,� � wt: TERMINAL � p � 4 •�.� �'' � ,1y e o � �,�° �'�„�=A � 'f:. INTERMODAL - s r. TRANSPORTATION CENTER r'Y(€�•, { �Qtt't < !rr`, 13 _?`'r} 1 '. T �l},`�' r"''.1 �":�� C�f .._� '�7a.,�'/( �. ` � r,� l• `a^ ( 11 if r --1; � 3}r _ .J'-`r I`/-. t�>:• rr�N FERRY1., t a -``ems !dr s..... V � .S' `•:\ q� y, ,�, i ��)' \t..��� ��-!•''.;-'... !! i�4���'tee."<•,l� r�/! 1.. � �.50 :.) r �. ,Y :.�.� 1� J Qom' .r' •1�j�S'!;: \•`�� ' ! � / a1 r ( I �, 1^ate+ r �/�i %�•/r'� l �eNr" goc d7' S {�til Y � 1>.h --'rF.r:���`,-1•,' � j �rS�l�'•1_"'-`M, •�o=O, /! . 'P3 K'tR. .�•�`T r� J/ ' -'A �tl Il g�1�. � Cour �) :y4: Project Locus Edwards BUTAPS 1 Intermodal Parking Facility anm�IL�hJ Barnstable, MA Appro)amate Scale: 1"=2,000' + ti "` �, • .44 IN l2.11 '> • AR t tA 52 r.� r r r•'w r � i '.--', x"• °v r f w7;�y�.: ����*zit ��"a-' r — ZME :E , i.., �itw�z )r<� lf�• / � � �r�� t✓'" ,�r�-�•i, f • aY�1i: s� / ®R .T.f c�': Jf(f}��, r'�f, is '�`�'y>t'Pa' 4'4 +ak �:Y �d4/�'x��'a/'i /. � '�. fl �.. I • r 3� Nl. t y o�'4 r.� 3 � • v� fsr�^F°� a: rc-`: �3i'rsy'r ,� rw .oA��yi. fsri f1 G 3 ..� r a .YC.. �'¢ yS. e 1 � t•v`' x'�.._.;.���,�Jw+/a '^.�Fe�W'Y, �.�•' "'c'!?:.'.'a'•'J �i. \ \\ ? '' . • k y� k vc yt �. ¢ � 1.k �� i F k.4�q� t�{a T ..gfeK • �- i 4 -� - JS. � �i•�i �� - L 1,X, �i Wort WNW- r �} 't IN PA 3Y `S.FSIE F� f s SC `, ;A+.'m'�.2i '•, �j(i/tC�- `{S�1 eL���' � ��p'y�' y`� � • cc m cea g MCI P .0 1 ]p• S � 01 ' � I ..r�ro Sn',�.rJ?' 3oy�� 3 ,I � �I,7 '� k:• Y �'' �a •�� � �'��'"�,e44r.-s,�,a #?i'wss}#-:. �� �1�; 7'�' x� '"`i a r ,e g;< 6r �' 1 � f Rom. r �i_a�'�ti'�"� �'• , F '• i ' �� o I a�<dr a �`"�a3r `' b �f , �. �'fy m Y �• aJ u / AW 's. 1 � y a ; r• .�5' 1 GRASS SWALE(TYP.) FUTURE AIRPORT i j fir- ¢t; Y t'. SERVICE ROAD "°d a PERIMETER ROAD _ <i \ ;. a RECONSTRUCTION .: ( � �' BY OTHERS �'`� , 4 y 1 j 1 •�.,.. _.:,1 ,;�.� '���, ,'i• ���� i,�// �tom.'"n� J.. �`.� ' r�t`T'� 3' <i,,., 1�-.� ' ', -t\^ �t �., �' .:;r \\ i ,3�/�, <�r �'4,pti• ;j; � �r�4�`,t�K ,.'i!�;;i ,�� / Y. MV �T .�, ���:> i�iv ,;l�+ '' ,�. f- "` `....• rl•''�/, •'d>r, r��� •r-. y\S. ;�i:l�' ti;.0 ,,�. r - t 1. �. � '\'. t F �'. BIORETENTiON 5: / �� Wi \ AREA ,�'' \,;.' = /; d ;k s; y� IK� 3 r P i��3 r i i f` r INFILTRATION Ei Eft t, W -bow, .k\ / : PROPOSED:. ss PARKING LOT ,. __ .1;.: ;P- - 'x�. -q;.. �\ _•..^! `.rr. ,�. 1. �' +�' x,,r•: � ''f t- 'r :''�Y7i ,('. '�'_."__... d .,•�=,i.'.yl j�i•° �' _ •� 1.- ,r� "J��.r � w ? '�i �1��-r,,i �w�1Pr{ f�r� `�LR -• �, t/..,'i ;�. � i .:� t �� �€p'' t � .may,.{ � .p ,;�: 1_ x ;ter n y�H r syt, y�,I/.�: r i• J f } - y'rj " rd.> xyy O :.7 '1 :,�`� '�•-�. �i�' \ itt e •''sY�� .- r v, ,- L:' . ,��+ .fit' :r'i��) '�, .i�sl'. 7 IL tit t',,:tl,�$� f`. :r' �,.,•Y!-'>, ;K tl��- 1 '''�.,' ',r:,!•.f. E '`4' .� t / ?>,.S'- ��, •�j'r .�:,.' �.... i, r. s•as�a.! /'; } ` rr, k ,'�,,u,F' .,�c, _ .,,, r; a�'l.s <:. 1 4'4 ,A+--,za ,lt•, 1 1:. I" '.A: rr'3� , r� r;3 �,��;} .:- -I'`' -;� ;;?•r" C ry._.x�r'tt��+$a. n.?''�.rJ•:�ix,_X'Yl�. ��2� �t�3�a'�(.. i..kft��va's���.�-:�`rt��u•�r. ,t9f.^. �i._' LER rA IaNG s ._... ..._.. . _ n• ,,, �BI�Ia1: BIpOCR-EfE O BIORETE O •i S h t , y r. AREA ®. . _ YamtouBi Road 1 7` i i l l - YKw� 1i I•' + r :r Sty �R . p Conceptual Layout Parking Area and Access Road. BUTAPS/Intermodal Transportation Center Barnstable,MA Figure 4a ..., ku w_ BIORETENTION / us AREA ! 'y 8 Z ' - PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD SIDEWALK INFILTRATION z' BASIN GRASS AREA(TYP.) _ — — — ��., „-.. �,.� . ��. — —— �---���. •s BIKE w ,� ,fit.,-.t• r 4 r.:,.n-a:+. �n,� - - .H :'..11•�Ylgt.`•,..,;:t.l�' �':"i:..,- - - - - -. - - -- -- - -- .. �.,-...tq 1'�,r•`rS,.� 1 � ;�.,.e�� x':'a` ! ,�L:.vxy4ntF� I' .1r, v:ry� � eJ-F 1:- .._-, 1 ` . .. .. .. ............_.._._...._.__.._r,:.-:•,.:-.,..z.. ......�-,-._._..c..,.,....- --.:.._._.Y._c_._•--i •-^—Tc"-::."_:t'..°^`Y• ram'•. .._...i - — - -_ 'p".� ' r ' ' � F� '{ ,`.•.� � j..(. #� � ! x�i r�liy 1. 1 i ��,{ 0t' �. ! r • r .e+:WAJ �tj( ^f r 1y f�ji 1 •`.%.' _. ..� ! �,L {tl, 3 � 1j 1 _ -:� r."�. % c��u' �• * yy'1'i i It a��3��)5:?.� (g- �"� � 1 }y 1. r "ry',rfi`J � �S 4YG sr+ •'��'� •t - ( I j f ' U. `Fy [' 3osw Conceptual Layout Parking Area and Access Road BUTAPS I Intermodal Transportation Center Barnstable,MA Fl ure 4b W. !` PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD SIDEWALK t LL. ! PROPOSED •. EXTEND TO MATCH FUTURE TAKINGS YARMOUTH R.O.W. �• w 1 `V- BIKE LANES -._...,_:..�.__..:...... - _ _ =: __- _- _- .. ..,..... ......_, .... _..... r , � J f , L~ i% } m��m •,: _ Road Y ' �--.�_ •�( - _ _ Bm�OtrLlr • 4 ;, A! r .I Ps 2 h`E t v S �u EYv(. y. FFtiy. i\ c fv J - QI J � I "� �� � 'f�•.a ,.��.,.0 \ ,- '�� }.�•o v� . , \ .Y80'" v I _ Conceptual Layout Barking eaaand Access Road TransportationCenter Barnstable,MA F ure 4c hI"E TO'ytio The Town of Barnstable Town Council STABLE, * 367 Main Street, Village of Hyannis MA 02601 MASS. 1639. �0 508-862-4602• Fax 508-862-4770 rFo N► s email: council@town.barnstable.ma.us TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA ouncilors: July 17, 2003 ary C.Blazis President 7:OU PM ,obert R.Jones, 1. ROLL CALL Vice President Richard G.Barry 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ;ary R.Brown Uchard W.Clark zichard D.Elrick 3. MOMENT OF SILENCE anet S.Joakim kudrey M. 4. ACT ON MINUTES Loughnane Gregory Milne ' Presentation of Jane Eshbaugh Community Service Award Zoyden C. Richardson 5. PUBLIC COMMENT earl S.Riedell Administrative 6. COUNCIL RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT Assistant Donald M.Grissom 7. COMMUNICATIONS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS, Town Council BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND STAFF, Secretary CORRESPONDENCE, ANNOUNCEMENTS AND Cheryl A.Phillips Town Council COMMITTEE REPORTS 8. PRESIDENT/VICE PRESIDENT COMMUNICATIONS 9. TOWN MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS 10. ORDERS OF THE DAY A. OLD BUSINESS B. NEW BUSINESS 1 2004-010—Administrative Code Amendment to the Open Space Committee Composition and Term of Office(May Be Acted Upon) . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2004-011 —Appropriation and Loan Order for the Addition to the Barnstable Police Facility (To Be Referred To Public Hearing August 21st) .. .. . ..... . . . . . . . . . . .25 —26 2004-012—Resolve Accepting Generous Gift of Playground Equipment Including: 4 School Age Swings,2 Infant Swings, and 1 Climber,to Replace the Existing Swings at Veterans Park Beach in Hyannis,From Al and Maureen Makkay (May Be Acted Upon)... .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . .27—28 Minutes from Barnstable Town Council meeting on June 19, 2003 . . . . .. ... .. . . . . . . ... . .30—45 3 A. OLD BUSINESS (PUBLIC HEARING-MAY BE ACTED UPON) BARNSTABLE.TOWN COUNCIL 2003-099 APPROPRIATION LOAN ORDER FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ACQUISITION OF LAND, OF A BARNSTABLE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PARKING SYSTEM TO THE EAST OF THE BARNSTABLE MUNICIPAL.AIRPORT INTRO.: 06/19/03; 07/17/03 ORDERED, that the vote taken under Item No. 98-054(Appropriation and Loan Order for the Construction, Including Acquisition of Land, of a Barnstable Unified Transportation and Parking System to the East of the Barnstable Municipal Airport)be amended by adding the following three parcels to the land to be acquired: Parcel 1: A parcel of land containing 31,900 square feet,more or less,having an address of 10 Mary Dunn Way,Hyannis MA,being Lot 136 on Assessors' Map 328, and identified as "Assessors' Map: 328 Parcel: 136," on a plan of land entitled"Town of Barnstable Plan Showing Land to be Taken at Mary Dunn Way and State Route 28/1yanough Road,Hyannis,(Barnstable) MA as made by the D.P.W. Engineering Division" a copy of which plan is on file with the Town Clerk's office; and Parcel 2: A parcel of land containing 29,177 square feet,more or less,having an address of 51 Brooks Road,Hyannis MA,being Lot 125 on Assessors' Map 328, and identified as"Assessors Map:328 Parcel: 125," on a plan of land entitled"Town of Barnstable Plan Showing Land to be Taken at Brooks Road Hyannis (Barnstable)MA as made by the D.P.W. Engineering Division"a copy of which plan is on file with the Town Clerk's office; and Parcel 3: a parcel of land containing 30,999 square feet,more or less,having an address of 33 Brooks Road,Hyannis MA,being Lot 126 on Assessors' Map 328, and identified as"Assessors Map: 328 Parcel: 126," on the plan above referenced for Parcel 2, and also as shown on Land Court Plan 15434-A,which plan is on file with the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds Land Registration Office; and that the amounts necessary to acquire the parcels specified in the order be borrowed and appropriated within the amount appropriated in Item No. 98-054. SPONSOR: Assistant Town Manager Joellen Daley DATE ACTION TAKEN 5 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 2003-102 TO: Town Council FROM: John C. Klimm, Town Manager DATE: June 19, 2003 SUBJECT: FY 2004 Operating Budget for the Community Services Department BACKGROUND: the Town of Barnstable acquired the Prince Cove Marina in January 2003. At the time the annual budget document was issued we were in the process of analyzing and developing an operating plan for this marina for FY 2004. Therefore,the FY 2004 budget for the Marine&Environmental Affairs Division, located within the Community Services Department, did not include the funds necessary to cover the anticipated cost of running this marina for FY 2004. ANALYSIS: the Town Manager is proposing the following budget for the first full year of operations of the Prince Cove Marina: Personnel and benefit costs totaling$68,932 for full-time and seasonal labor. Operating expenses of$30,375 include funds for items such as utilities,repairs and maintenance, advertising and promotion and general and administrative expenses. A budget of$40,800 for other requirements,which includes $30,800 to pay for interest on the bond anticipation note issued for acquiring the marina. No principal payment will need to be made in FY 2004. This project will be borrowed long-term in FY 2004 resulting in the first principal payment in FY 2005. The remaining$10,000 includes the cost for adding the marina onto our property and casualty policy. FISCAL.IMPACT: the additional funds needed to operate the Prince Cove Marina in FY 2004 are completely covered by the estimated new fee revenue from operating the marina. The new revenue generated by the Prince Cove Marina operation is estimated to exceed the additional funding request by$64,643 in FY 2004 creating more than enough capacity to fund these requests. TOWN.MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: the Town Manager recommends approval of the transfer order. STAFF ASSISTANCE: Dan Horn,Harbormaster and Mark Milne,Finance Director 7 Commonwealth of Massachusetts For Office Use Onty Executive Office of Environmentai Affairs Executive Office of Environmental Affairs ■MEPA Office E 0 E A No.:/3yp? ' ENFEnvironmental MEPA AnalysR,GA av�e F Notification Form Phone: 617-626 The information requested on this form must be completed to begin MEPA Review in accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00: Project Name: Steamship Authority Parking Lot Street: Aviation Way Formed Mary Dunn Wa Municipality: Barnstable Watershed: Cape Cod Universal Tranverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude: 41039147.1411N 15135002.22899 N; 1291797.20461 E Longitude: 70016134.7911 W Estimated commencement date: April,2005 Estimated completion date: May,2005 Approximate cost: $200,000 1 Status of pro'ect design: 75°kcomplete Proponent: Woods Hole,Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority Street: Railroad Avenue,P.O. Box 284 Municipality: Woods Hole State: MA Zip Code: 02543 Name of Contact Person From Whom Copies of this ENF May Be Obtained: Maryann T. Magner Firm/Agency: Edwards and Kelcey Street: 343 Con ress Street Municipality: Boston State: MA Zip Code: 02210 Phone: 617-242-9222 Fax: 617-242-9824 E-mail: mmagner@ekmall.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? ❑Yes NNo Has this project been filed with MEPA before? ®Yes (EOEA No.11138 - ❑No withdrawn) Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? ®Yes (EOEA No. 12267) [:]No Is this an Expanded ENF (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(6)) ❑Yes NNo a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) ❑Yes NNo a Waiver of mandatory EIR?(see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes NNo a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes NNo Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an agency of the Commonwealth, including the agency name and the amount of funding or land area (in acres): Are you requesting coordinated review with any other federal, state, regional, or local agency? ❑Yes(Specify ) NNo List Local or Federal Permits and Approvals: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)Release for long term(20 year) lease of land for non-aviation purposes. Which ENF or EIR review threshold(s)does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03): Revised 10/99 Comment period is limited. For information call 617-626-1020 ❑ Land ❑ Rare Species ❑Wetlands, Waterways, &Tidelands ❑Water ❑ Wastewater ® Transportation ❑ Energy ❑Air : ❑ACEC El Solid & Hazardous Waste ❑ Regulations ❑ Historical &Archaeological Resources Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total State Permits & & Environmental Impacts Approvals ❑.Order of Conditions Total site acreage 8.3 ❑Superseding Order of New acres of land altere Conditions d 5.7 El-Chapter 91 License Acres of impervious area 0 0 0 ❑.401 Water Quality Certification Square feet of new bordering 0 ❑ MHD or MDC Access vegetated wetlands alteration Permit Square feet of new other 0 ❑Water Management wetland alteration Act Permit Acres of new non-water 0 ❑ New Source Approval dependent use of tidelands or ❑ DEP or MWRA waterways Sewer Connection/ Extension Permit E • ❑ Other Permits Gross square footage 60 0 60 (including Legislative Number of housing units p 0 0 Approvals)— Specify: Maximum height(in feet) 15 0 15 TRANSPORTATION Vehicle trips per day 11,116 2,764 3,880 Parking spaces (Seasonal) 248• 614 862 + See Project Description Gallons/day(GPD) of water use 0 0 0 GPD water withdrawal 0 0 0 GPD wastewater generation/ 0 0 0 treatment Length of water/sewer mains 0 0 0 (in miles) CONSERVATION LAND:Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public natural resources to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? ❑Yes(Specify ) ®No Will it involve the release of any conservation restriction,preservation restriction,agricultural preservation restriction,or watershed preservation restriction? ❑Yes(Specify ) ®No -2- RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated Habitat of Rare Species,Vernal Pools, Priority Sites of Rare Species,or Exemplary Natural Communities? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ❑Yes(Specify ) ®No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? ❑Yes(Specify ) [:]No AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project in or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? ❑Yes(Specify ) ®No PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project description should include (a) a description of the project site, (b)a description of both on-site and off-site alternatives and the impacts associated with each alternative, and (c) potential on-site and off-site mitigation measures for each alternative (You may attach one additional page, if necessary) The Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority (SSA) proposes to build a gravel parking lot on Airport property, southeast of the East Ramp, off Aviation Way (formerly Mary Dunn Way). The purpose of the project is to replace an interim 650 space remote parking area that was taken by the Federal Aviation Administration for the construction of the Runway 33 Safety Area at Barnstable Municipal Airport. The interim lot (in use up until Fall 2004) had approximately 650 spaces. The new lot will provide 862 spaces, a net increase of 212. The proposed lot will be used by the Steamship Authority for over-flow automobile parking on a seasonal basis. The Airport will also use the lot for overflow parking during the several peak summer weekends. The 8.3 acre site consists of a remaining portion of the interim lot and currently vacant land that has been previously used for non-aviation related activities. The lot would provide parking spaces for approximately 862 cars and maintain the existing staging area for approximately 15 trailer trucks. The lot will be fenced, lighted and have an attendant during operating hours. Since the late 1980s,the SSA has been using the area as a truck staging area. Trailer trucks are diverted to this staging area to wait for the scheduled sailing time. Trucks coming off the vessels are taken to the lot to be picked up by the drivers. The staging area minimizes congestion at the waterfront. In the late 1990s, as part of the reconstruction of the ferry terminal and at the request of the Town,the SSA reduced the size of its terminal parking lot at the Hyannis waterfront. The SSA expanded and improved the truck staging lot it had been leasing from the Airport and established an interim, seasonal remote lot for passenger cars. The interim lot was expanded in 2002 in response to the continued reduction of illegal parking in the downtown and waterfront areas as well as the increase in "passenger-only" travel to Nantucket. Approximately 11,000 cars used the lot last summer. Until recently, the Town planned to develop a large,paved permanent intermodal facility for 1000 cars at the Airport site. This project; which also included a by-pass road, is known as BUTAPS (Barnstable Unified Transportation and Parking Study). The Town has recently decided they will not build the paved intermodal facility. Additionally, the Airport is not planning to build a replacement lot. The SSA needs to construct a replacement parking lot in time for the 2005 summer season. In the future, if the Town decides to go forward with the bypass portion of the BUTAPS plan, the proposed parking lot would not interfere with the bypass roadway layout. -3- Alternatives The proposed project will replace an existing(up until Fall 2004) interim seasonal remote parking lot.The interim lot was the result of several planning studies that addressed the issue of traffic circulation, pedestrian safety and parking in the downtown and waterfront areas of Hyannis. Several traffic planning studies identified the need for remote parking alternatives to downtown and waterfront parking. Additionally, the MEPA Certificates for the Ferry Terminal Reconstruction relied heavily on agreements between the Town and the Steamship Authority regarding off-site parking as mitigation. The No-Build Alternative is unfeasible because it would result in several hundred cars parking (legally and illegally)in the downtown/waterfront of Hyannis every summer weekend. Design options were considered for the parking lot. A paved lot is not economically feasible because it is only used between May and September. A gravel lot with a liner would be as expensive and perhaps more expensive than a paved lot. The Feasible Build Alternative is a graded gravel lot with 4 inches of dense gravel covered with 2 inches of compacted blue stone. Mitigation Because the lot is in a Zone 11 municipal groundwater protection area and the Cape Cod Sole Source Aquifer, several mitigation measures are proposed. The base of the graded lot will consist of 4 inches of dense graded gravel and 2 inches of compacted stone, similar to the previous lot. This base has been used in other SSA lots and has been effective in holding incidental oil and gas spills and coolant boilovers until the material can be removed and properly disposed. Groundwater monitoring wells will be installed hydrologically downgradient of the lot and groundwater samples will be collected in accordance with Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection protocols on a monthly basis from May through October and once in January. Samples will be submitted to a Massachusetts certified laboratory for analysis of volatile organic compounds including methyl tert butyl ether(MTBE)by EPA Method 8260.A similar sampling program was established for the interim lot. Results of the sampling are then summarized and submitted to the Steamship Authority as well as the Barnstable Municipal Airport and the Barnstable Water Company. The lot will not be used for parking of any vehicles that transport petroleum products or hazardous materials. Washing or refueling of vehicles will not be allowed. The parking lot will be staffed and inspected daily when it is in use. A Spill Response Plan has been developed. Steamship authority personnel are trained in rapid response. The interim lot(in use up until Fall 2004)had approximately 650 spaces. The new lot will provide 862 spaces, a net increase of 212. Traffic studies done for the Airport Terminal E1R factored in the planned 1000 car intermodal lot(no longer proposed).Planned improvements to Route 28,signalization of the intersection of Route 28 and Aviation Way,and improvements to Yarmouth Road will support the net increase in parking and traffic impacts are expected to be generally positive for the overall area.Message boards on Route 6 will be considered in order to direct traffic to the parking lot by way of Exit 7 in order to lessen congestion on Route.132,thus minimizing downtown traffic. -4- TOWN OF BARNSTABLE "ARNBTAeLE• ' OFFICE OF TOWN ATTORNEY MA9S. 367 MAIN STREET HYANNIS, MASSACHUSETTS 02601-3907 ROBERT D.SMITH,Town Attorney TEL.#•(508)862-4620 RUTH J.WEIL, 1"Assistant Town Attorney FAX#• (508)862-4724 T.DAVID HOUGHTON,Assistant Town Attorney January 3, 2005 www.town.barnstable.ma.us CLAIRE R.GRIFFEN, Paralegal/Legal Assistant CLAUDETTE BOOKBINDER,Legal Clerk Keren Schlomy, Esq. Rubin and Rudman LLP 50 Rowes Wharf Boston, MA 02110-3319 Re: Public Records Request Letter Dated December 21, 2004 Dear Ms. Schlomy: In response to your above-captioned request,this office is not in possession of any of the records of the Airport Commission that relate to `.`the Town's interest in taking, purchasing or otherwise acquiring"the Fournier Oil property. Very truly yours, r C /tdh T. DAVID HOUGHTON, Assistant Town Attorney Cc: Barbara Harris, Esq. 20030160 recregltrl �oF� > BARNSTABLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT o„ BOARDMAN-POLANDO FIELD BARMABIX = 480 BARNSTABLE ROAD, 2ND FLOOR 9`b059. •0� HYANNIS' MA 02601 RFD MA't a www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-775-2020 Quincy"Doc"Mosby,Airport Manager Fax: 508-775-0453 Frank Sanchez, Asst.Airport Manager unstable Municipal irport Commission: January 3, 2005 ichael A.Dunning, :►airman Via Certified Mail •hn T.Griffin,Jr., Keren Schlomy, Esq. ice Chairman Rubin and Rudman LLP rthur F.Kimber, Counselors at Law )mmissioner,Clerk 50 Rowes Wharf argarete Maillho, Boston, MA 021 i0-3319 )mmissioner Re: Public Records Request M F.Wheatley, B&A Fournier Realty Trust/Hubbard Oil Company Properties )mmissioner 33 and 51 Brooks Road, Hyannis, MA )bert L.O'Brian Assessors Map 14, Parcels 25 and 26 )mmissioner athony J.Balsamo Dear Mrs. Schlomy: )mmissioner Pursuant to your request dated December 21, 2004,we have examined the airport administrative files and do not have any records relating to the above referenced matter. Per our previous conversation, same subject, the airport has no immediate plans to initiate any action to acquire your client's property, either via eminent domain or purchase. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions regarding this matter, or need any further assistance. Very truly R I Q ' cy , DBA Airport Manager C:\Documents and Settings\mosbyq\My DocumentAfoumier jan 05 ltr.doc I BARBARA HARRIS ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O.BOX 861 BARNSTABLE,MASSACHUSETTS 02630-0861 TELEPHONE FACSIMILE 508-428-0501 508-420-1527 January 3, 2005 Keren Schlomy,Esquire Rubin and Rudman LLP 50 Rowes Wharf _ Boston MA 02110-3319 Re: Public Records Request-Hubbard Oil Company property Dear Ms. Schlomy: In response to your letter of December 21,2004, I do not have custody of any public records regarding the above property. Very truly yours, Barbara Harris i gP cc: Robert D. Smith, Town Attorney, Town of Barnstable I RUBIN AND RUDMAN LLP COUNSELLORS AT LAW 50 ROWES WHARF • BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02110-3319 TELEPHONE: (617)330-7000 • FACSIMILE:(617)439-9556 • EMAIL: FIRM@RUBINRUDMAN.COM January 26, 2005 By Certified Mail-Return Receipt Requested Linda E. Hutchenrider, Town Clerk Barnstable Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis,MA 02601 Re: Public Records Request B&A Fournier Realty Trust/Hubbard Oil Company Properties 33 and 51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA Assessors Map 14, Parcels 25 and 26 Dear Ms. Hutchenrider: Our clients,B&S Fournier Realty Trust and the Hubbard Oil Company, are trying to determine whether there ever was, or is, an intent to take the above-referenced properties by eminent domain or by purchase.. To that end, this letter constitutes a request under the Massachusetts Public Records Law (Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4, § 7, cl. 26 and M.G.L. c. 66, § 10) for any and all public records' in the possession of the Town relating to the Town's past or present interest in taking,purchasing or otherwise acquiring the above-referenced properties. This request includes,but is not limited to, any documents referring to our clients' properties in connection with the Airport's runway protection zone project and/or the Barnstable Unified Transportation and Parking System Project, including documents supporting or leading up to the Town Council vote on July 17, 2003, Order 2003-009, and Order 98-054, which added our clients' properties to the list of"parcels of land to be acquired,"documents of subsequent meetings with and analysis by Town personnel and/or Town consultants Horseley& Witten, relocation specialists, appraisers and any other documents relating to these properties. 'The term"public records"is broadly defined to include "All books,papers,maps,photographs,recorded tapes,financial statements,statistical tabulations,or other documentary materials or data,regardless of physical form or characteristics,made or received by any officer or employee of any agency,executive office,department,board,commission,bureau,division or authority of the commonwealth, or of any political subdivision thereof." M.G.L. c.4,§ 7 cl.26. RUBIN AND RUDMAN LLP Linda E.Hutchenrider, Town Clerk January 26, 2005 Page 2 Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 66, § 10, you have ten(10) days to respond to this request. We request a prompt response to this request and will be following up with your office on the progress of your response later in the month. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you require additional information or have any questions. Very truly yours, Keren Schlomy, Esq. cc: Evelyn Read, General Manager, Hubbard Oil 6270061 APPENDIX D RECT NOV 3 0 2004 GroGROUNDWATER P.O.Bo 1200 Analytical, Inc. �7 P.O.Box 1200 Buz A11 ALYTICAL B Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 November 29, 2004 FAX(508)759-4475 www.groundwateranalytical.com Mr. David Bennett Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 s � LABORATORY REPORT Project: Hubbard Oil Co.- Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Lab I D: 78492 Received: 11-11-04 Dear Dave: Enclosed are the analytical results for the above referenced project. The project was processed for Standard turnaround. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a sample receipt report detailing the samples received, a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a quality control report, and a statement of our state certifications. The analytical results contained in this report meet all applicable NELAC standards, except as may be specifically noted, or described in the project narrative. This report may only be used or reproduced in its entirety. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Eric H Jensen Oper tions M nager EHJ/ka Enclosures GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 2'C Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Airbill: n/a Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 78492 Lab Receipt: 11-11-04 Custody Seal(s): n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 78492-1 GZA-1 Aqueous 11/10/04 12:45 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C483580 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901 E 04-14-04 n/a C483577 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901E 04-14-04 n/a C483565 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901E 04-14-04 n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 78492-2 GZA-2 Aqueous 11/10/04 12:15 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C483605 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901 E 04-14-04 n/a C483604 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCl R-3901E 04-14-04 n/a C483592 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCl R-3901 E 04-14-04 n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 78492-3 MW-55 Aqueous 11/10/04 10:50 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C483595 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI - R-3901E 04-14-04 n/a C483563 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901 E 04-14-04 n/a C483551 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901 E 04-14-04 n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 784924 MW-5D Aqueous 11/10/04 11:10 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C483582 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901E 04-14-04 n/a C483594 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901E 04-14-04 n/a C483575 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCl R-3901 E 04-14-04 n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 78492-5 'MW-6S Aqueous 11/10/04 11:30 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C483606 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901E 04-14-04 n/a C483564 40 ml.VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901E 04-14-04 n/a C483552 40 mL VOA Vial Proline SX12071 HCI R-3901E 04-14-04 n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 78492-6 MW-6D Aqueous 11/10/04 11:55 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C483593 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901E 04-14-04 n/a C483581 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901 E 04-14-04 n/a C4835761 40 mL VOA Vial Proline BX12071 HCI R-3901 E 04-14-04 n/a j 7GZA-1 field ID— -Matrix-=Sampled==Method Notes Aqueous 11/10/04 12:45 MA DEP EPH with PAHs by 8270C-Mod SIM ontainer Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship Amber Glass Proline BX14800 H2SO4 RA153F 10-28-04 10-29Amber Glass Proline BX14800 H2SO4 R 4153E 10 28-04 10 29-04 ��.r_ n .- lab lD-' Fie'Id IDS^^ �_--^ - Matrix - Sampled= ILtethw=� -�^ ^--� = c='Notes-- -^- - +c 78492-8 GZA-2 Aqueous 11/10/04 12:15 MA DEP EPH with PAHs by 8270C-Mod SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C526233 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX14800 H2SO4 R4153F 10-28-04 10-29-04 C526232 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX14800 H2SO4 R4153F 10-28-04 10-29-04 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 J GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report (Continued) Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 2'C Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Airbill: n/a Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 78492 Lab Receipt: 11-11-04 Custody Seal(s): n/a E ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 92-9 MW-55 Aqueous 11/10/04 10:50 MA DEP EPH with PAHs by 8270C-Mod SIM ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship 865 1 LAmberGlass Proline BX14756 H2SO4 R-4153F 10-12-04 n/a 864 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX14756 H2504 R4153F 10-12-04 n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 78492-10 MW-5D Aqueous 11/10/04 11:10 MA DEP EPH with PAHs by 8270C-Mod SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C526228 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX14800 H2SO4 R-4153F 1 10-28-04 10-29-04 C517866 1 LAmberGlass Proline BX14756 H2SO4 R-4153F 1 10-12-04 n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 78492-11 MW-6S Aqueous 11/10/04 11:30 MA DEP EPH with PAHs by 8270C-Mod SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C526237 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX14800 H2SO4 R4153F 10-28-04 10-29-04 C526236 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX14800 112504 R4153F 10-28-04 10-29-04 Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 78492-12 MW-6D Aqueous 11/10/04 11:55 MA DEP EPH with PAHs by 8270C-Mod SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C526239 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX14800 H2SO4 R-4153F 10-28-04 10-29-04 C526238 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX14800 H2SO4 R-4153F 10-28-04 10-29-04 Lab ID Feld ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes ei - - - - - 78492-13 SEA-1 Aqueous 11/10/04 14:10 TPH by GC ASTM D3328-00 Mod Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C526230 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX14800 H2SO4 R4153F 10-28-04 10-29-04 C526229 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX14800 H2SO4 R-4153F 10-28-04 10-29-04 Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 78492-14 SEA-2 Aqueous 11/10/04 14:45 TPH by GC ASTM D3328-00 Mod Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C526231 1 L Amber Glass F Proline BX14800 H2504 R4153F 10-28-04 10-29-04 C517618 1 L Amber Glass I Proline BX14769 H2SO4 R4153F 10-28-04 10-29-04 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Data Certification Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./8002-3490 Lab ID: 78492 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Received: 11-11-04 17:45 MA DEP Compendium of Analytical Methods Project Location: n/a MA DEP RTN: n/a This Form provides certifications for the following data set: MA DEP VPH: 78492-01,-02,03,04,05,06 MA DEP EPH: 78492-07,-08,09,-10,-11,-12 Sample Matrices: Groundwater (X) Soil/Sediment ( ) Drinking water ( ) Other ( ) MCP SW-846 8260E ( ) 8151A ( ) 8330 ( ) 6010B ( ) 7470A/1A ( ) Methods Used I 8270C ( ) 8081A ( ) VPH (X) 6020 ( ) 9012A2 ( ) As specified in.MA DEP 8082 ( ) 8021 B ( ) EPH (X) 7000 S3 ( ) Other ( ) Compendium of Analytical 1. List Release Tracking Number(RTN),if known. Methods. '2. SW-846 Method 9012A(Equivalent to 9014)or MA DEP Physiologically Available Cyanide(PAC)Method (check all that apply) 3. S-SW-846 Methods 7000 Series. List individual method and analyte. An affirmative response to questions A,B,C and D is required for"Presumptive Certainty"status. / A. Were all samples received by the laboratory in a condition consistent with J that described on the Chain-of--Custody documentation for the data set? Yes B. Were all QA/QC procedures required for the specified analytical method(s) 1 included in this report followed, including the requirement to note and discuss in a narrative QC data that did not meet appropriate performance standards or guidelines? Yes ` C. Does the analytical data included in this report meet all the requirements / for"Presumptive Certainty,"as described in Section 2.0 of the MA DEP document CAM VII A,Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Analytical Data? Yes D. VPH and EPH methods only: Was the VPH or EPH method run without significant modifications,as specified in Section 11.3? Yes A response to questions E and F below is required for"Presumptive Certainty"status. ✓ E. Were all QC performance standards and recommendations for the f specified methods achieved? Yes F. Were results for all analyte-list compounds/elements for the specified method(s)reported? Yes All No answers are addressed in the attached Project Narrative. I,the undersigned,attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that,based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for obtaining the information,the material contained in this analytical report is,to the best of my,!? yk owledge and belief,accurate and complete. Signature: Position: Operations Manager Printed Name: Eric .Jense Date: 11-29-04 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PID/FID Field ID: GZA-1 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCl/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-01 QC Batch ID: VG10-2221-W - Sampled: 11-10-04 12:45 Instrument ID: GC-10 Agilent 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 11-17-04 21:38 Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: JR VPH Ranges - Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons to BRL ug/L 100 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t® BRL ug/L 100 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 100 Unadjusted n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t. BRL ug/L 100 Unadiusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 100 CAS Number Analyte Concentration Notes Units Reporting limit y 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-but I Ether n BRL ug/L 25 71-43-2 Benzene° BRL ug/L 5 108-88-3 Toluene° BRL ug/L 25 10OA14 Ethy(benzene t BRL ug/L 25 108-38-3 and 10642-3 meta_ X lene and para-X lene= BRL I ug/L 1 25 9547-6 ortho- X lene t BRL ug/L 25 91-20-3 1 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 25 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 82 82 % 70-130% 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 85 85 % 70-130% QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. u Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. # Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PID/FID Field ID: GZA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCl/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-02 QC Batch ID: VG10-2221-W Sampled: 11-10-04 12:15 Instrument ID: GC-10 Agilent 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 11-17-04 22:19 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JR VPH Ranges Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t0 BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons to BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 24 ug/L 20 Unadiusted n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 Unadiusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t 31 ug/L 20 CAS Number Analyte Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit 1634-04A Methyl tert-bu I Ether" BRL ug/L 5 71-43-2 Benzene° BRL ug/L 1 108-88-3 Toluene° BRL ug/L 5 100-414 Eth (benzene; BRL ug/L 5 108-38-3 and 10"2-3 meta-X lene and para-X lene= BRL ug/L 5 95-47-6 ortho- X lene= BRL ug/L 5 91-20-3 Naphthalene 6 ug/L 5 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits. 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 81 81 % 70-130% 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 86 86 % 70-130% - - QA/QC Certification — 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. u Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. # Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PID/FID Field ID: MW-5S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCl/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-03 QC Batch ID: VG10-2221-W Sampled: 11-10-04 10:50 Instrument ID: GC-10 Agilent 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 11-17-04 22:59 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JR VPH Ranges Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons to BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons to BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-CI0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 Unadjusted n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 Unadjusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 CAS Number Analyte Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-but I Ether° BRL ug/L 5 7143-2 Benzene° BRL ug/L 1 108-88-3 Toluene° BRL ug/L 5 10041-4 Eth (benzene; BRL ug/L 5 108-38.3 and 10642-3 meta-X lene and para-X lenet BRL ug/L 5 95-47-6 ortho- X lene t BRL ug/L 5 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 82 82 % 70-130 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 83 83 % 70-130% QA/QC Certification {- - - -- - 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. tt Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. # Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PI D/FI D Field ID: MW-5D Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCl/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-04 QC Batch ID: VG10-2221-W Sampled: 11-10-04 11:10 Instrument ID: GC-10 Agilent 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 11-17-04 23:40 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JR - - . . ---- -- - - - -- - - _. --- ----- VPH. Rang__e_s Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons i0 BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t® BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-CIO Aromatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 20 Unadiusted n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 Unadiusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 CAS Number ,Analyte Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-but I Ether' BRL ug/L 5 71-43-2 Benzene° BRL ug/L 1 108-88-3 Toluene° BRL ug/L 5 100-41-4 Eth (benzene 1 BRL ug/L 5 108-38-3 and 10642.3 meta-X lene and para-X lenet BRL ug/L 5 95-47-6 ortho- X lene= BRL ug/L 5 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 QC Surrogate Compound 7 piked Measured Recovery QC Limits 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 78 78 % 70-130% 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 80 80 % 70-130% - QA/QC Certification — - 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. r( Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. t Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PID/FID Field ID: MW-6S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCl/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-05 QC Batch ID: VG10-2221-W Sampled: 11-10-04 11:30 Instrument ID: GC-10 Agilent 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 11-18-04 00:20 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: )R VPH Ranges Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons to BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t® BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' 82 ug/L 20 Unadiusted n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 Unadjusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t 110 ug/L 20 CAS Number Analyte Concentration Notes T Units Reporting Limit 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-but I Ether° BRL ug/L 5 7143-2 Benzene° BRL ug/L 1 108-88-3 Toluene° BRL ug/L 5 100414 Eth (benzene; 13 ug/L 5 108-38-3 and 10642.3 meta-X lene and ara-X lenei BRL ug/L 5 95 47-6 ortho X lene= BRL ug/L 5 91-20-3 Naphthalene 13 ug/L 5 QC Surrogate Compound— Spiked JMeasuredl Recovery QC Limits 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 1 81 1 81 % 70-130% 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 1 84 1 84 % 70-130% QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality controfreport. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. 9 Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. # Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PID/FID Field ID: MW-611) Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCl/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-06 QC Batch ID: VG10-2221-W Sampled: 11-10-04 11:55 Instrument ID: GC-10 Agilent 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 11-18-04 01:00 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JR VPH Ranges: Concentration ^- g Limit Notes Units Reporting n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons to BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons to BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 Unadiusted n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 Unadi BRL ug/L 20 CAS Number Analyte Concentration Notes Units Repor ing Limit. 1634-04-4 Methyl ten-but I Ether' BRL ug/L 5 71-43-2 Benzene° BRL ug/L 1 108-88-3 Toluene° BRL ug/L 5 100-414 Eth (benzene$ BRL ug/L 5 108-38-3 and 10642-3 meta-X lene and ara-X lenet BRL ug/L 5 95-47-6 ortho- X lene= BRL ug/L 5 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured Recovery - QC Limits` 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 87 87 % 70-130% 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 89 89 % 70-130% QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n{70 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. rt Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. t Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: GZA-1 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-07 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 12:45 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mt. Analyzed(AL): 11-24-04 21:58 Aliphatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 11-24-04 22:41 Aromatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: MM EPH Ranges = Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons+ BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t° 200 ug/L 150 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons+ 220 ug/L 150 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured=. Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 36 91 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 30 75 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 29 71 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 35 89 % 40-140% QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 r GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: GZA-1 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-07 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 12:45 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 11-24-04 11:38 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JJT CAS Number. Analyte- Concentration Notes Units Reporting limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene 2.2 ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 0.5 206-44-0 Fluoranthene 4.6 ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene 3.4 ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene 1.3 ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene 2.1 ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 3.2 ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.2 ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene 2.0 ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 1.5 ug/L 1 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.3 ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1.4 ug/L 0.1 QC Surrogate Compound J Spiked Measured Recovery QC limits ortho-Terphenyl 40 1 49 122 % 40-1401/6 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FI D Field ID: GZA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-08 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 12:15 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 11-24-04 23:25 Aliphatic Dilution Factor. 1 Analyzed(AR): 11-25-04 00:09 Aromatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: MM EPH Ranges Concentration Notes Units Reporting timir - - . _- n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic H drocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-Cl9 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t° BRL ug/L 150 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 150 QC Surrogate Compound' Spiked Measured Recovery - QC Limits - - _ Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 37 92 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 37 92 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 31 77 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 37 91 % 40-140% QA/QC Certification _ 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: GZA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-08 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 12:15 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mt. Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 11-24-04 12:18 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: JJT i CAS Number _ Analyte Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.8 ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 0.5 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.1 ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL I ug/L 1 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 0.1 QC Surrogate Compound "`. Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl 40 1 . 47 116 % 40-140% Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-5S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./6002-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-09 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 10:50 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 11-25-04 01:36 Aliphatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 11-25-04 02:20 Aromatic Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: MM EPH Ranges' --.'.c Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 0 BRL ug/L 150 Unadjusted n-Cl1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 150 QC Surrogate Compound - - Spiked Measured Recovery, QC.Limits - Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 35 87 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 35 88 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 31 78 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 35 89 % 40-140% QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW-5S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-09 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 10:50 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 11-24-04 12:58 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JJT CAS Number Analyte ",. Concentration:., Notes Units- Reporting Urni - 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 0.5 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 1 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 0.1 C Surro ate Com ound7 -sip-iked Measured r� Recove T a = — QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl 40 43 108 % 40-140% Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GUID Field ID: MW-51) Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-10 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 11:10 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 11-25-04 03:04 Aliphatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 11-25-04 03:48 Aromatic Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: MM HPH-Ranges Concentration Notes _Units Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-Cl9 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-Cl1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons to BRL ug/L 150 I Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 150 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured' -- Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 33 83 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 32 79 % 40-140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 30 75 % 40-140 ortho-Terphenyl 40 32 79 % 40-140 -= QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancetacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C71 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW-5D Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-10 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 11:10 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 11-24-04 13:38 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JJT --- - _ CAS Number Analyte " „Concentration Notes Units . Reporting Limit - - -.___-4_ w. - - --- 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 0.5 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 1 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 1 0.1 191-24-2 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 1 0.1 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured -Recovery QC Limits -- - — - ortho-Terphenyl 40 40 100 % 40-140 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III 0996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FI D Field ID: MW-6S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-11 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 11:30 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 11-25-04 04:32 Aliphatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 11-25-04 05:15 Aromatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: MM EPH Ranges Concentration Notes Units Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic H drocarbons t° BRL ug/L 150 Unadiusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 150 QC Surrogate Compound. Spiked = Measured Recovery QC Limits - - Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 34 86 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 35 87 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 31 77 % 40-140 ortho-Terphenyl 40 34 85 % 40-140% QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW-6S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-11 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 11:30 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 ml Analyzed: 11-24-04 14:18 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: )JT CAS Number Analyte �Conceotration ° Notes Reportin Limit•-[' 91-20-3 Naphthalene 2.2 ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene 0.8 ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 0.5 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL I ug/L 1 0.1 53-70.3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 0.1 =.QC Surrogate Compound Spiked"`Measured;�, Recovery__. .�, ;_ QC LIITIIts ortho-Terphenyl 40 41 102 % 40-140% Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-6D Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-12 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 11:55 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 11-25-04 05:59 Aliphatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 11-25-04 06:43 Aromatic Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: MM - EPH Ranges Concentration Notes = Units Reportmg tjmit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-CI9 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-Cl1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons f° BRL ug/L 150 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons f BRL ug/L 150 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured Recovery, - "£ = QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 28 70 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 28 70 % 40-140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 30 74 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 29 73 % 40-140 QA/QC Certification - 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze concentrations. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW-6D Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-12 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Sampled: 11-10-04 11:55 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 11-24-04 14:57 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JJT CAS Number Analyte'. Concentration% Notes Units Reporting Limit" 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 0.5 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[klfluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL I ug/L 1 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 0.1 QC Surrogate Compound - Spiked_measure'cll Recovery- - QC Limits - - -- -- - - ortho-Terphenyl 40 34 84 % 40-140% Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ASTM Method D3328-00 (Modified) Hydrocarbon Fingerprint by GC/FID Field ID: SEA-1 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-13 QC Batch ID: HF-1535-F Sampled: 11-10-04 14:10 Instrument ID: GC-12 Agi lent 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mt. Extracted: 11-17-04 08:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 11-23-04 14:48 Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: MM - ,.Qualitative Identification - This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to: 1. Fuel Oil No. 2/Diesel Fuel. 2. Based on the distribution of the isoprenoid hydrocarbons to the n-C alkanes,the Fuel Oil appears to be mildly weathered. Concentration = ` ` Notes Units Reporting Umit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 23 mg/L 1 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl 0.040 d d 60-140 Method Reference: Comparison of Waterborne Petroleum Oils by Gas Chromatography,Annual Book of ASTM Standards,Volume 11.02, American Society for Testing and Materials(2000). Method modified to quantify total petroleum hydrocarbons in the range n-C 9 through n-C 36. Results are quantified on the basis of a series of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons,using 5-alpha-androstane as an internal standard. Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. d Surrogate recovery not measurable due to required sample dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ASTM METHOD D3328-00 (Modified) Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting by GC/FID Lab ID: 78492-13 Hydrocarbons Laboratory 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Retention Time (Minutes) GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ASTM Method D3328-00 (Modified) Hydrocarbon Fingerprint by GOAD Field ID: SEA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 78492-14 QC Batch ID: HF-1535-F Sampled: 11-10-04 14:45 Instrument ID: GC-12 Agilent 6890 Received: 11-11-04 17:45 Sample Volume: 1000 mL Extracted: 11-17-04 08:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 11-23-04 15:28 Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: MM Qualitative Identification This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to: 1. Fuel Oil No. 2/Diesel Fuel. 2. Based on the distribution of the isoprenoid hydrocarbons to the n-C alkanes,the Fuel Oil appears to be mildly weathered. Anal e yt `' " _. Concentration Notes Units RepoAi�g limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 81 mg/L 2 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits ------ ortho-Terphenyl 0.040 d d 60-140 Method Reference: Comparison of Waterborne Petroleum Oils by Gas Chromatography,Annual Book of ASTM Standards,Volume 11.02, American Society for Testing and Materials(2000). Method modified to quantify total petroleum hydrocarbons in the range n-C 9 through n-C 36. Results are quantified on the basis of a series of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons,using 5-alpha-androstane as an internal standard. Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. d Surrogate recoveries not measurable due to required sample dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ASTM METHOD D3328-00 (Modified) Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting by GG/FID Lab ID: 78492-14 Hydrocarbons Laboratory 1.4 ,.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Retention Time (Minutes) GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Project Narrative . Project: Hubbard Oil Co.-Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Lab ID: 78492 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 11-11-04 17:45 �'-.,,cs �.�.+?..<=t*cZhT y�=`q�' �'h�"�_yRs��"3c7wrk` "'"u'�;r,�,� �.�'Sr,�.' �•t'°'.k".7 �''P"kN�;t .'' �' _ ai �y..�sfr ltt. �. � � A:iDocumentation and Client Commurncation The following documentation discrepancies,and client changes or amendments were noted for this project: 1 . No documentation discrepancies,changes,or amendments were noted. a^S • ' 'ntr =u a,V X—V' c S" '-f � � B.-Method,Modifications-Non Conformances and,Observations ?&ZM*1 s13r;rzoµ s.(`.6` *., k -a ..acW„'� The sample(s) in this project were analyzed by the references analytical method(s),and no method modifications, non-conformances or analytical issues were noted,except as indicated below: 1 . MA DEP EPH Note:Samples 78492-07,08,-09;10,-11;12. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon(PAH)target analytes were identified and quantified by GC/MS-SIM, in accordance with the method provision for alternate determinative methodologies.GUMS-SIM was used to achieve low quantification limits necessary for regulatory compliance. Target analytes were determined utilizing the same sample extract used for carbon range determination by GGFID. 2 . MA DEP VPH Note: Sample 78492-01.Sample was diluted prior to analysis. Dilution was required due to observed foaming characteristics of sample.Sample foaming interfers with purge and trap sample concentration. 3 . TPH by GC/FID Non-conformance: Samples 78492-13,-14. Sample had surrogate recoveries outside recommended limits due to required sample dilution. 4. TPH by GC/FID Note: Samples 78492-13,-14. Sample was diluted prior to analysis. Dilution was required to keep all target analytes within calibration. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 Buzzards Bay,MA02532 IUIJT nr—%,UPII! ANALYTICAL Telephone dwat ran tyylical.wm(508)7594475 AND WORK ORDER www.groundwaterana Project Name: Firm: TURNAROUND ^i^ C ANALYSIS REQUEST ��UObCtfG VIl Cp.-groD LS ( / 1.t.. ( Y) Yahlllp se"I" tl'a dee e o Nebh 6agd Chemistry InMr STANDARD 10 Business Days) waste Project Number: Address: ❑ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) ? gryy�� z4Ro 1573 Ma',,,,St- P D-p oY.(667 RUSH(RAN- t 0 0 0 0 0 �W�-� L (Rion requires Rush IWtnorl anon Number) p ❑❑❑ ' ❑ ❑ Sampler Name: City/State/Zip: ❑Please Email to:rI p ❑ $ STWISRW g,,�s � MIS °�i Please �b8 gq _ 66 e110 — 3 _ ❑ E W � g� 8t Project Manager: Telephone: f BILLING ,{p o 0 ❑ o o B ig� ���K T-I� �tig gib-�63v 9 Purchase Order No.: ?CO? ❑ Third Parry Billing: ? a 7 ❑ a INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates). ❑ GWAOuote: z $ $ a jr s g ° o ° Sampling Matrix s Type Contalner(s) Preservation o H o ° ❑ o o ❑II1 ❑ a ❑ e o$c mx = � 6n � �° $SII�❑ ° P sLABORATORY %oy ❑CATO On ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ o ° ❑ o ° NUMBER z a e ° o L ❑SAM IDENTIFI o ao 111oe Z "� 1 } C z -Z b: I: o - ( ; o - 2;10 E REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specific OC All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. MA DEP MCP Data Enhancement Affirmation State Standard Deliverables Marry regulatory programs and EPA methods require project eli m Date Time Received by:L.-p /.uG• Receipt Temperature: YES ONO MCP Data Certification is r,qubed. specific OC.Project specific OC includes Sample Duplicates, / per Q ❑ee nRe q—no D ❑CT ,Q MCP GW-1/S-1 ❑PWS Form Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.laboratory OC is , ` �-'wt z se eeosfiso ace not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC D to Time Received Container Count: O YES ONO MCP minimum c ri: QC e;uri. meets ❑ME ❑MCP GW-2/S 2 D MWRA samples are charged on a per sample basis.Each MS,MSD !,Ku ls by: ha.•c been met fcr t:::s p:o^r;. 'S MA ❑NY STARS p and Sample Duplicate requires an additional sample aliquot pp�� /I 11 !A[ewls,eer.,valrra o5re::,.::.,.:r.!gxnide arulyres rrquire one malri.rpi<r pn_9 crplesl ❑NH ❑Drinking Water Number. Relinqulshed try: Date Time Race' IZy to NumnglAlrbili OYES❑NO CPU' long Water s.:.-;L•s rrgwred. ❑NY ❑Wastewater Project Specific OC Required Selection at OC SamSampleNumbe !'r /,•r fxrion of ccn:m�r.•,rlupGcare ampler. ❑RI ❑Waste Disposal ❑Sample Duplicate O Please use sample: C nea a r.lso mruimi.d 1'Cn simples collected Signature: ❑VT ❑Dredge Material ❑Matrix Spike Method of hipment GWA Courier❑Express Mail O Federal press Custody Seal ❑_ ❑ ❑Matrix Spike Duplicate UPS❑Hand❑ Number. GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Assurance/Quality Control A rogram O n �` Ml �� � Pverviewy ' } ,:�+t# `4'.ti. `�:t ..� a"zS.,..v�r� i`h..�°s'.kt - ..�j",• `� '� a "' Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceabi I ity. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GC/MS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing calibration standard. GC/MS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. MINgefg_ .� B Dinit�ons .F1='n. Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: ASTM D3328-00 Mod Hydrocarbon Fingerprint Instrument ID: GC-12 Agilent 6890 QC Batch ID: HF-1535-F Extracted: 11-17-04 08:30 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 11-19-04 18:40 Units: mg/L Analyst: MM Analyte Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits Fuel Oil No.2 2.0 2.0 100 % 60-140% QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits - ortho-Terphenyl 0.040 0.035 88 % 60-140% Method Reference: Comparison of Waterborne Petroleum Oils by Gas Chromatography,Annual Book of ASTM Standards,Volume 11.02, American Society for Testing and Materials(2000). Method modified to quantify total petroleum hydrocarbons in the range n-C 9 through n-C 36. Results are quantified on the basis of a series of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons,using 5-alpha-androstane as an internal standard. Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: ASTM D3328-00 Mod Hydrocarbon Fingerprint Instrument ID: GC-12 Agilent 6890 QC Batch ID: HF-1535-F Extracted: 11-17-04 08:30 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 11-19-0418:00 Analyst: MM Analyte "Concentration Notes Units Reporting iimit_; - - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons BRL mg/L 0.2 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured> .Recovery QC Limits r ortho-Terphenyl 0.040 6.033 83 % 60-140% Method Reference: Comparison of Waterborne Petroleum Oils by Gas Chromatography,Annual Book of ASTM Standards,Volume 11.02, American Society for Testing and Materials(2000). Method modified to quantify total petroleum hydrocarbons in the range n-C 9 through n-C 36. Results are quantified on the basis of a series of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons,using 5-alpha-androstane as an internal standard. Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Samples LCS LCSD Category: EPA 8270C Modified Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 11-24-04 10:19 Analyzed: 11-24-04 10:59 Units: ug/L Analyst: JJT Analyst: JJT CAS Number Analyte LCS LCS Duplicate QC Limits Spiked M�surea Recovery Spiked musurea Recovery. RPD Spike RPD 91-20-3 Naphthalene 5.0 4.0 80 % 5.0 3.6 73 % 10 % 40-140% 20% 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene 5.0 4.3 87 % 5.0 4.0 80 % 8 % 40-140% 20% 85-01-8 Phenanthrene 5.0 4.3 85 % 5.0 3.9 77 % 10 % 40-140% 20% 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 5.0 4.9 98 % 5.0 4.5 89.% 10 % 40-140% 20% 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene 5.0 5.0 99 % 5.0 4.4 88 % 12 % 40-140% 20% 86-73-7 Fluorene 5.0 5.0 99 % 5.0 4.4 89 % 11 % 40-140% 20% 120-12-7 Anthracene 5.0 4.7 93 % 5.0 1 4.2 83 % 11 % 40-140% 20% 206-44-0 Fluoranthene 5.0 4.8 95 % 5.0 4.3 85 % 11 % 40-140% 20% 129-00-0 Pyrene 5.0 4.7 93 % 5.0 4.2 84 % 10 % 40-140% 20% 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene 5.0 4.4 87 % 5.0 4.0 79 % 10 % 40-140% 20% 218-01-9 Chrysene 5.0 4.1 82 % 5.0 3.7 74 % 10 % 40-140% 20% 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 5.0 4.8 96 % 5.0 4.4 87 % 9 % 40-140% 20% 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 5.0 4.9 99 % 5.0 1 4.5 90 % 10 % 40-140% 20% 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene 5.0 5.0 100 % 5.0 4.5 90 0 11 % 40-140% 20% 193-39-5 1 Indeno[1,2,3c,d]pyrene 5.0 4.8 95 % 5.0 4.2 85 % 12 % 40-140% 20% 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 5.0 5.0 101 % 5.0 4.5 90 % 12 % 40-140% 20% 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 5.0 4.7 95 % 5.0 4.2 84 % 11 % 40-140% 20 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured Recovery Spiked Measured Recovery 'QC Limits - - ortho-Terphenyl 40 46 1 115 % 40 1 37 1 92 % 40-140 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update 111(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. The LCS and LCSD are prepared from separate source standards than those used for calibration. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: EPA Method 8270C(Mod.)-EPH PAHs by GC/MS-SIM Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 11-24-04 09:39 Analyst: JJT "CAS Number_ Analyte .: Concentration. Notes Units ReportmgLimit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 0.5 20644-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 1 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene I BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 0.1 1 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured _ Recovery, — QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl 1 40 1 49 1 123 % 40-140% Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Samples LCS LCSD Category: MA DEP EPH Method Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed(AL): 11-23-04 18:15 Analyzed(AL): 11-23-04 19:41 Units: ug/L Analyzed(AR): 11-23-04 18:58 Analyzed(AR): 11-23-04 20:25 Analyst: MM Analyst: MM CAS Number Analyte LCS LCS Duplicate QC Limits Spiked.Meabu.ed _Recovery_ Spiked Measured Recovery RPD __._ .Spike ._ RPD 111-84-2 n-Nonane(C9) 50 29 59 % 50 28 55 % 6 % 30-140% 25% 124-18-5 n-Decane(Clo) 50 33 66 % 50 31 63 % 6 % 40-140% 25% 112-40-3 n-Dodecane(C12) 50 34 69 % 50 33 65 % 5 % 40-140% 25% 629-59-4 n-Tetradecane(C14) 50 39 77 % 50 37 74 % 5 % 40-140% 25% 544-76-3 n-Hexadecane(C16) 50 43 85 % 50 41 82 % 4 % 40-140% 25% 59345-3 n-Octadecane(Cle) 50 46 93 % 50 45 89 % 4 % 40-140% 25% n/a n-C9 to n-C18 Group 300 220 75 % 300 1 210 1 71 % 5 % 40-140% 25% 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(C19) 50 44 89 % 50 43 85 % 4 % 40-140% 25% 112-95-8 n-Eicosane(C20) 50 45 90 % 50 43 87 % 4 % 40-140% 25% 629-97-0 n-Docosane(C22) 50 44 87 % 50 42 83 % 5 % 40-140% 25% 646-31-1 n-Tetracosane(C24) 50 40 81 % 50 39 78 % 4 % 40-140% 25% 630-01-3 n-Hexacosane(C26) 50 41 83 % 50 39 78 % 6 % 40-140% 25% 630-02-4 n-Octacosane(C28) 50 39 78 % 50 38 76 % 4 % 40-140% 25% 638-68-6 n-Triacontane(C30) 50 40 80 % 50 1 38 1 76 % 4 % 40-140% 25% 630-06-8 n-Hexatriacontane(C36) 50 43 87 % 50 41 83 % 5 % 40-140% 25% n/a n-C19 to n-C36 Group 400 340 84 % 400 320 81 % 4 % 40-140% 25% 91-20-3 Naphthalene 50 39 77 % 50 32 64 % 18 % 40-140% 25% 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene 50 41 82 % 50 35 70 % 16 % 40-140% 25% 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene 50 43 86 % 50 37 75 % 14 % 40-140% 25% 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 50 44 88 % 50 38 77 % 13 % 40-140% 25% 86-73-7 Fluorene 50 45 90 % 50 40 79 % 13 % 40-140% 25% 85-01-8 Phenanthrene 50 48 97 % 50 42 85 % 13 % 40-140% 25% 120-12-7 Anthracene 50 48 97 % 50 42 84 % 14 % 40-140% 25% 206-44-0 Fluoranthene 50 50 100 % 50 44 89 % 12 % 40-140% 25% 129-00-0 Pyrene 50 49 98 % 50 43 87 % 12 % 40-140% 25% 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene 50 51 102 % 50 44 87 % 15 % 40-140% 25% 218-01-9 Chrysene 50 44 87 % 50 38 77 % 13 % 40-140% 25% 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 50 49 97 % 50 43 1 86 % 13 % 40-140% 1 25% 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 50 47 1 95 % E85 42 84 % 12 % 40-140% 25% 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene 50 47 94 % 41 82 % 13 % 40-140% 25% 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3c,d]pyrene 50 50 100 % 43 86 % 15 % 40-140% 25% 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 50 49 99 % 43 85 % 14 % 40-140% 25% 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,ilperylene 50 48 95 % 43 85 % 15 % 40-140% 25% n/a PAH Group 850 790 93 % 690 81 % 14 % 40-140% 1 25% -QC-Surrogate,Compound ..-_.Spiked .MeasHM .Recovery,Spiked .Measured�Recovery� _r.. C,Ltmtts_ Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 38 96 % 40 35 88 % 40-140 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 38 95 % 40 35 88 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro octadecane 40 34 85 % 40 33 82 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 38 96 % 40 34 84 % 40-140 -- ----- ----- Fraction,ation-,BreakthroughEvaluatio ----�--- .---- QC Limits_.._.;. 91-20-3 Naphthalene LCS 0 % LCSD 0 % 5% 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene LCS 0 % LCSD 0 % 5% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. The LCS and LCSD are prepared from separate source standards than those used for calibration. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: MA DEP EPH Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 QC Batch ID: EP-1446-F Extracted: 11-22-04 13:30 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed(AL): 11-23-04 16:52 Analyzed(AR): 11-23-04 17:32 Analyst: MM EPH Ranges Concentration Notes Units. .Reporting Limit. n-C9 to n-Cl8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-Cl 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbon t° BRL ug/L 150 Unadiusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 150 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured. Recovery Q C Limits — -- - -- -- -- - - Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 36 89 % 40-'140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 34 86 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 37 93 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 37 91 % 40-140% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory,operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Samples LCS LCSD Category: MA DEP VPH Instrument ID: GC-10 HP 5890 Instrument ID: GC-10 HP 5890 QC Batch ID: VG10-2221-W Analyzed: 11-17-04 09:18 Analyzed: 11-17-04 19:36 Matrix: Aqueous Analyst: JR Analyst: JR - Units: ug/L CAS Number Analyte LCS LCS Duplicate QC Limits Spiked Measured Recovery Spiked Measured Recovery RPD Spike RPDJI 109-66-0 n-Pentane 50 53 106 % 50 57 115 % 2 % 70-130% 25% 107-83-5 2-Methylpentane 50 52 103 % 50 56 111 % 2 % 70-130% 25% 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 50 51 101 % 50 54 109 % 2 % 70-130% 25% n/a Aliphatic Group 1 150 160 107 % 1 150 170 113 % 2 % 70-130% 25% 111-84-2 n-Nonane 50 45 91 % 50 47 94 % 1 % 70-130% 25% 124-18-5 n-Decane 50 52 104 % 50 48 97 % 2 % 70-130% 25% 1678-93-9 n-Butylcyclohexane 50 49 98 % 50 50 100 % 0 % 70-130% 25% n/a Aliphatic Group 2 150 150 100 % 150 150 100 % 0 % 70-130% 25% 1634-044 Methyl tert-butyl Ether 50 57 114 % 50 57 115 % 0 % 70-130% 25% 7143-2 Benzene 50 1 51 1 102 % 50 52 103 % 0 % 70-130% 25% 108-88-3 Toluene 50 51 101 % 50 51 102 % 0 % 70-130% 25% 10041-4 Ethylbenzene 50 51 101 % 50 52 104 % 1 % 70-130% 25% 108-38-3 and 106-42-3 meta-Xylene and para-Xylene 100 100 100 % 100 100 100 % 0 % 70-130% 25% 9547-6 ortho- Xylene 50 52 103 % 50 52 104 % 0 % 70-130% 25% 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 50 51 102 % 50 51 103 % 0 % 70-130% 25% 91-20-3 Naphthalene 1 50 1 48 1 95 % 50 50 100 % 1 % 70-130% 25*0 n/a Aromatic Group 450 1 460 1 102 % 1 450 1 470 1 104 % 1 % 70-130%1 250 QC Surrogate ked Compound Spi Measures iked Recovery Sp Measured Recovery QC Limits - - 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 78 78 % 100 88 88 % 70-130% 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 1 80 80 % 100 91 91 % 70-130% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: MA DEP VPH Instrument ID: GC-10 Agi lent 6890 QC Batch ID: VG10-2221-W Analyzed: 11-17-04 09:59 Matrix: Aqueous Analyst: )R VPH.'Ranges Concentration_ Notes Units Reporting Limit n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons to BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons to BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 Unadjusted n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 4 BRL ug/L 20 Unadjusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 CAS Number Analyte Concentration r- _- Notes Units Reporting Limit 1634-044 Methyl tert-butyl Ether° BRL ug/L 5 71-43-2 Benzene° BRL ug/L 1 108-88-3 Toluene ° BRL ug/L 5 100414 Eth (benzene 4 BRL ug/L 5 108-38-3 and 10642-3 meta-X lene and ara-X lene 4 BRL ug/L' 5 9547-6 ortho- X lene= BRL ug/L 5 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 88 88 % 70-130 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 91 91 0& 70-130% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(Revision 1.1,2004). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. zt Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. # Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Certifications and Approvals Groundwater Analytical maintains environmental laboratory certification in a variety of states. Copies of our current certificates may be obtained from our website: http://www.groundwateranalytical.com/qualifications.htm RMIN_ _„ffi CONNECTICUT; Depar�tm o"Hera t Service P3H`0586 ?¢ �¢ .: e�i�<x-f' "'a.:-_'w�"S�'n'�.YSd€�,.K�s"X".`.e�s"�n..�sv., �'`_`�__�`2t';�-'�'"i�5�"��d'•�'.���'3��, ?�.�'F�:.�� �����..�r.,�,._ �..�: .:K'ig`, .x za'�-i,. Categories: Potable Water,Wastewater,Solid Waste and Soil http://www.dph.state.ct.us/BRS/Environmental Lab/OutState Lab List.htm �FLO�R�®A De artment�,of}Health <Bureau°o_fayl�aboratories�E87fi43 `'s-. .� � T ,� f mn Categories:SDWA,CWA, RCRA/CERCLA http://www.floridadep.grg/labs/qa/d.ohforms.htm MAINE>Department of Human Services;�MA10`3 :�`��� :��,-. Categories: Drinking Water and Wastewater http://www.state.me.us/dhs/eng/water/Compliance.htm -� MASSACHUS�ZETTS A�epartment of.;Env�ronmenfal P�otect�on;�M MA 103� � ,� r Categories: Potable Water and Non-Potable Water http://www.state.ma.Us/dep/bspt/wes/files/certlabs.pdf 2tt�.a-E^ g-"..�la's✓`.���,i'srklK�i""�»��tc��'•�3s�`.s�3��5J3'=�s'��'j`x'.S�h�-� T'.'��"✓rS'��.`#r�.�+��s �'>�„ ice- ,.,, v `_aYY,ef�.is• my* �c .. . ANEW HAMPSHIRE�DeparfinentoftEnvironmental Se�r,�v�ces�703 � '���� ��� ����� . � - _--�, .�.`y#:.s�-�� '4.''�. 'i°��[��-.r��;.?,��,z.$.�t �.•�'7�.`.�T.?,�'-a.'t���'.__.,:i?'�'�iFS'`Y?+.'+...r�`at'�i°=6- _..�.�8 ....mke.:..4�`�x...a n.F.7!.�..ftA�"' Categories: Drinking Water and Wastewater http://www.des.state.nh.us/asp/NHELAP/labsview.asp '�-.•�3N,,EW`' ��aK�� �.��� �°�,H'e�th�1�754�F � . ?.���,;.:�=, 1;��s�_ �.����-��r'� {_ �' '4 Y ��"� t Categories: Potable Water, Non-Potable Water and Sol id,Waste http://www.wadsworth.oreabcert/elap/comm.html Environmental Laboratory Registration(Non-drinking water and Non-wastewater) http://www.dep.state.pa.us/Labs/Registered/ `�' HO�DE,IS'LA.[ �Departm �°,fH�� 54 ,�.*s- .� �. �t � � �' `�• ,.. Categories:Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage http://www.healthri.org/lab0absCT—MA.htm, US epartment off g icu Itu a So I�Pem t 5�'3921 a Foreign soil import permit Category: Drinking Water http://www.vermontdri'nki_ngwaier.org/wsops/labtable.PbF Y Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 K Table 1: Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards EPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-PERIlVIETER GROUNDWATER Monitoring EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH JG% Well RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS Standandard Location (µg/L-PPb) (µme -PPb) (µg/L-PPb) (µg/L-PPb) (µme--ppb) (µme-ppb) (I1P�--PPb) (PP 3 [10/23/02] [1/27/03] [4/24/03] [6/3/03] [10/9/03] [2/5/04] [11/10/04] 310 CA1)Z 3Y'O0 R ALL PAH's ALL PAH's ALL PAH's d 44 q(c2: A-I(D) �- to C18 NOT NOT NOT NOT BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) '1000 �20;000a to C36 TESTED TESTED TESTED TESTED BRL <500 BRL <500 BRL <500 to C22 BRL(<160) 160 200 200;� 30;000 eta PAH NT hthalene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) tethylnaphthalene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) '10 000` laphthene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) �20 r laphthalylene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) a 300 3 Irene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.50.5< ) nanthrene 0.8 2.2u iracene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) 0p0 3'000� ,ranthene 2.2 4.6 3Q0 200..E; me 1.4 3.4 `. 200." 3,OO.W. zo(a)anthracene 0.5. 13 �13r 3 isene 1.1 2.1 3000 zo(b)fluoranthene 1.2 3.2u3ot zo(k)fluoranthene 0.9 1.2 1 3000 zo(a)pyrene 0.9 2.0 0 2`r 3000= iol,2,3-c,d)pyrene 1.0 1.5 0 5' 3;OQ0 ;nzo(a,h)anthracene 0.2 0.3 zo(g,h,i)perylene 1.1 1.4 3�OQ 300 � A-2(S) to C18 BRL(.�-20) BRL(<530) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 4 0 20AOO 1 to C36 BRL(<20) BRL(<530) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 500Ni k to C22 33 BRL(<170)' BRL(<160) BRL(<l60) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<150) 200 31100(1 eta PAH BRL(<5) BRL(<11) BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<0.5) hthalene BRL(<0.5) 0.8 4 20 6;000c} iethylnaphthalene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) 10 r 00�0 Y iaphthene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) 6'40 1 iaphthalylene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) �3uu 3 Irene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) nanthrene 0.9 BRL(<0.5) N ,300 SQI iracene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0 5) �12 000 - 3,000� ianthene 2.2 BRL(<0.5) 300' 2 ,r►e 1.4 BRL(<0.5) zo(a)anthracene 0.6 BRL(<O.1) `" 3 0 isene 1.0 BRL(<0.1) �' 23 000 zo(b)fluoianthene 1.0 0.1 zo(k)fluoranthene 0.8 BRL(<0,1) fiy 3Q0 P zo(a)pyrene 0.8 BRL(<0.1) 0 2 s 3z000�t� iol,2,3-c,d)pyrene 0.8 BRL(<O.1) K 0 5 3 ,nzo(a,h)anthracene 0.2 BRL(<0.1) zo(g,h,i)Perylene 0.8 BRL(<O.1) V3005r: n� 3�0� 4-3(S) :o C18 BRL(<20) NOT NOT NOT BRL(<500) NOT NOTJ 4{000 100 to C36 BRL(<20) TESTED TESTED. TESTED BRL(<500) TESTED TESTED 5000p 2U;1M10 to C22 BRL(<20) BRL(<160) 00 30 4I PAH BRL.(<5) NT 4PAH>di,;f� Ali -5S o C18 NOT BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) r, �4x00. a7ti0 . to C36 TESTED BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 5,0500 � 20;000 to C22 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<150) 200 30 12 PAH BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<l0) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) 0P,AH>10/ 1' 1>SOJ* �ALL?0•'=7 .y Table 1: Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards EPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-PERIMETER GROUNDWATER Monitoring EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH GW-: GW=3fi Well RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS Standard Standard Location (µPS--ppb) (µg/L-ppb) (µg/L-ppb) (lid-ppb) (µg/L-ppb) (µ€/L-ppb) (µg/L-ppb) [10/23/02] [1/27/03] [4/24/03] [6/3/03] [10/9/03] [2/5/04] [11/10/04] :1AOC 3410 GMR` ALL PAH's ALL PAH's ALL PAH's -5D . to C18 NOT BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 4 Q00' 20 000 to C36 TESTED BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 5 000. 10000 1 to C22 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<150) 200 F� '3 I U et PAH BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) hthalene BRL(<0.5) ethylnaphthalene BRL(<0.5) naphthene BRL(<0.5) f. 20 5;00�0 naphthalylene BRL(<0.5) 300, rene BRL(<0.5) 300J3 000 nanthrene 0.6 30In scene BRL(<0.5) "'' 200;0' x' 3,000 9 ranthene 1.4 300 200-c ene 0.9 200 t "3-000 (a)anthracene 0.3 1 � 3;Q(0 ;P sene 0.6 2 3•'000 zo(b)fluoranthene 0.6 1,: zo(k)fluoranthene 0.4 zo(a)pyrene 0.4 2. '30" ino1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 0.4 05 r3�;`0 ;enzo(a,h)anthracene 0.1 0. 3 00 azo(g,h,i)perylene 0.5 ;.3;U0. 3090 W-6S , to C18 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(5500) BRL(<500) 4�000- 20 0001W '�,.a!ets..rTrSw^dc any.. 9 to C36 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 5 Ovu . < < �3�r0�00 •: 1 to C22 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL( 160) BRL(<150) 200 rget PAH BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<0.5) K �r"1 phthalene 2.1 BRL(<0.5) 2.2 20�- 60001 WM nethylnaphthalene 1.2 BRL(<0.5) 0.8 ; ?yyv k0�� naphthene ` BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) r20" •3�0 �naphthalylene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) 300 orene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) f3i0100 ; enanthrene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) } 300 A50 thracene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) A 2 IUUU tw•r' X } oranthene 0.7 BRL(<0.5) 3 rene BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) r 206" 000 nzo(a)anthracene 0.2 BRL(<O.1) 1 rysene 0.3' BRL(<O.1) _°em�s~�,�2 000Y azo(b)guoranthene 0.3 BRL(<0.1) <a 3,000w nzo(k)fluoranthene 0.2 BRL(<0.1) -W000 �zo(a)pyrene 0.2 BRL(<O.1) 2{( 0 ,nol,2,3-c,d)pyrene 0.2 BRL(<0.1) )enzo(a,h)anthracene BRL(<0.1) BRL(<0.1) ? .O t Ea 3.g0 nzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.2 BRL(<0.1) 300 3000 W-6D t to C18 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) r 45000 a 20 000 9 to C36 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) *Sk00�0 �20 0009 1 to C22 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) 190 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<160) BRL(<150) 0 � 'AW12 PAH BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<10) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) BRL(<0.5) AH>r10/ AET4>50/' Bold text indicates results that exceed applicable groundwater category(s) Shaded areas designates appropriate groundwater category(s) Table 2: Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards VPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-PERIlVIETER GROUNDWATER Monitoring VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH ''G � Well RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS Standar S"taIn Location (µ1/L-ppb) (µg/L-ppb) (µg/L-pPb) -(µg/L-pPb) (µgIL-ppb) (IlPlL-ppb) (lig/L-ppb) (PP P [10/23/02] [1/27/03] [4/24/03] [6/3/03] [10/9/03] [2/5/04] [11/10/04] 330C1`SR 3LO CMR . GZA-1(D) . — s, r t CS to C8 NOT NOT NOT NOT BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<100) VMS 00 �4C9 to C12 TESTED TESTED TESTED TESTED BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<100) 4'0000,. .Z4:r0j000r- C9 to C10 BRL(<20) 37 BRL(<I00) 2�00 � 000 BTEX/Naphthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5/20) EDB NT NT NT 50,000 . LEAD NT NT NT M0: GZA-2(S) � CS IO C8 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(QO) C9 to C12 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 0�O0,tvr 0. '. C9 to C10 33 BRL(<20) 25 34 BRL(<20) 20 24 . 20 + Xylene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 11 BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) '100 a 50000 Ethylbenzene BRL(<5) BRL(<S) 6 10 BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) "' 700. i E 4000 Other Target BTEX BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) >5 r I000 Naphthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 6 BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 620 6000� EDB NT BRL(<.02) NT NT NT NT NTk 50 OOOM LEAD NT BRL(<5) NT NT , BRL(<6) NT NWT ,_t1�5�� ........_ '30 GZ_4-3(S) CS to C8 BRL(<20) NOT NOT NOT BRL(<20) NOT NOT 0 mmlf 'ogoIni C9 to C12 BRL(<20) TESTED TESTED TESTED BRL(<20) TESTED TESTED4g006 20 000, C9 to C10 BRL(<N BRL(<20) 200 ,, �4;0, BTEX/Naphthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) Ell 00� EDB NT NT n, SQ 000 LEAD NT NTd MW-5S fit$' a ` aRK C5 to C8 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 0 4;000 C9 to C12 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) .. 4 000`� ImU50b 0000 C9 to CIO 21 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 41 BRL(<20) 00 + P ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) �° BTEX/Na hthalene BRL <5 BRL <5 BRL <5 BRL <5 BRL <5 BRL <5 BRL <5 EDB NT BRL(<0.2) NT NT NT NT NT 02 SU 000 LEAD NT 17 BRL(<5) NT 8 NT NT I5: s t*x30� « u ME ¢.vy C5 to C8 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 4�00 C9 to C12 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL.(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 4000:y00�0 C9 to C10 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) »200' t� d;000 BTEX/Naphthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5/25) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) >5 >4�000�`t EDB NT BRL(<.02) NT NT NT NT NT 02+; 01411, 50'000 LEAD NT BRL(<5) NT NT BRL(<6) NT NT MW-6S " + 400" 4300�0 C5 to C8 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 24 BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) ,fi C9 to C12 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 20 BRL(<20) BRL(<100) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 4 009, 20 00000 C9 to Cl0 51 100 150 BRL(<20) 130 BRL(<20) 82 �2 4;000�z Xylene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 5 BRL(<5) 71 BRL(<5) BRL(<5) �10.000 50 000' Ethylbenzene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 13 �700 . `Ri Other BTEX BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5/25) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 4'00.0 - Naphthalene BRL(<5) 8 11 BRL(<5) BRL(<25) BRL(<5) 13 �20 f000¢�_ EDB NT BRL(<.02) NT NT NT NT NT ; LEAD NT BRL(<5) NT NT BRL(<6) NT NT14. '+ MW-6D T C5 to CS BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20j BRL(<20) BRL(<io) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) � C9 to C12 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 4TOOd., 20 0 C9 to C10 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) BRL(<20) 200' �4,000 BTEX/Naphthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) BRL(<5) EDB NT BRL(<.02) NT NT NT NT NT LEAD NT BRL(<5) NT NT BRL(<6) NT NT 15: 30 � Bold text indicates results that exceed applicable groundwater category(s) Shaded areas designates appropriate groundwater category(s) Table 3: Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards EPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-CENTRAL GROUNDWATER EPH EPH EPH Monitoring RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS `Standari 4Standards Well Location (µg/L-ppb) (µg/L-ppb) (llg/L-ppb) [10/02] [2/5/04] [11/10/04] _310 CMR }_3:10 (Based on ALL PAH's (Based on 40:974(2) 40.994(2) 60/40 split for 60/40 split for TPH results) TPH results) MW-1 C9 to C18 200 700 NOT 4 000 20 000 C19 to C36 NA BRL(<500) TESTED 5 000 20 000 '! Cl I to C22 300 450 200 30 000 17 Target PAHs NT All BRL TPH/Total EPH 500 1,150 MW-2 C9 to C18 BRL BRL(<500) NOT '000 10,060 C19 to C36 BRL BRL(<500) TESTED 5;000, .= 20,000, ." Cl l to C22 BRL BRL(<160) 20Q 30 000 17 Target PAHs NT All BRL 4PAA>10/A '"PAH4>50/'t LU0.7 ALUO.'I TPWrotal EPH BRL -BRL MW-4 — C9 to C18 240 BRL(<500) NOT 4,000.1 20 000` C19 to C36 NA BRL(<500) TESTED 3,0.00 530,000 Cl I to C22 360 180 200 30,000 4 PAH/12 PAH NT All BRL 4PAH510/A PAH0.$0/' LL?0:T lA >0:3 TPH/Total EPH 600 180 200 200 SEA-1 - C9 to C18 2,560 16,000 9,200 4,000 20 000' C19 to C36 NA 2,300 NA 5;000 20000 C11 to C22 3,840 7,300 13,800 200_ 30,000 Target PAH NT naphthalene 57 20' .6 000 , 2-methylnaphthalene 100 10 31000 " acenaphthene BRL(0.5) 20_ 5 000:.:_ acenaphthalylene 4.7 300 3 000 fluorene 11 300, " 3.,000" .-- phenanthrene 16 300 anthracene 1.8 00.; 3 000 fluoranthene BRL(<0.5) 300 pyrene 1.7 200 ,:3 000 benzo(a)anthracene BRL(<O.1) chrysene BRL(<O.1) - benzo(b)fluoranthene BRL(<O.1) 1 3 000 benzo(k)fluoranthene BRL(<O.1) 1 3 000: benzo(a)pyrene BRL(<O.1) Or"2 3,000; ideno1,2,3-c,d)pyrene BRL(<O.1) 015' 3 000 dibenzo(a,h)anthracene BRL(<O.1) 03, 3 000 benzo(g,h,i)perylene BRL(<O.1) 300,: 3 000 TPH/Total EPH 6;400 26,000 23,000 200 "� 200 o Table 3: Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards EPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-CENTRAL GROUNDWATER SEA-2 7y C9 to C18 16,000 4,300 32,400 �4 000, 20 OOOt C19 to C36 NA 650 NA C11 to C22 24,000 1,400 48,600 Tar eet PAH NT 0.6 naphthalene 9.2 20 =6 000 2-methylnaphthalene BRL(<0.5) 10', 3 000, >' acenaphthene 1.4 �5000 acenaphthalylene 3.0 300 3 0001 fluorene 4.3 �300 3,000 phenanthrene BRL(<0.5) 300' 5.0 anthracene BRL(<0.5) 2 000: =.-3 00W. fluoranthene BRL(<0.5) 300=" 200 pyrene BRL(<O.1) 200 ''.3-0 00'" benzo(a)anthracene BRL(<O.1) chrysene BRL(<O.1) benzo(b)fluoranthene BRL(<O.1) .1, 31,900 benzo(k)fluoranthene BRL(<O.1) 1..; :° 3,000- benzo(a)pyrene BRL(<O.1) 004 3 000' ideno1,2,3-c,d)pyrene BRL(<0.1) 0.5 3 000 dibenzo(a,h)anthracene BRL(<O.1) 0:5, 3;000 benzo(g,h,i)perylene BRL(<O.1) 300 3 000 TPH/I•otal EPH 40,000 6,450 81,000 200 200 _ Bold text indicates results that exceed applicable groundwater category(s) Shaded areas designates appropriate groundwater category(s) Table 4: Method 1 Risk Characterization Stamdards VPH ANALYSIS SUMMARY-CENTRAL GROUNDWATER Monitoring VPH RESULTS VPH RESULTS VPH RESULTS ' GWL GW - Well Location (µg/L.-ppb) (µg/L-ppb) (µg/L-ppb) tandard stanaai d. ' [10/23/02] [2/5/04] [11/10/04] 3LO CuMR ', 310d�MR^�" 4(:= MW-1 CS to C8 NOT BRL(<20) NOT a 400 � �x-.�' 41000 ` ¢ C9 to C12 TESTED BRL(<20) TESTED 4;0 OA OOOO,R C9 to C10 BRL(<20) benzene BRL(<I) :3'° u a ".000'' .,. ethylbenzene BRL(<5) 7,00 ` ' 4'000'` toluene BRL <5) xylene .BRL(<5) � 10 00 r �50 000 naphthalene BRL(<5) 2'0 - 6000k �r MTBE BRL(<5) 70 REi.:, 50,000 MW-2 C5 to C8 NOT BRL(<40) NOT 400 C9 to C12 TESTED BRL(<40) TESTED _ 4 00OF 0 C9 to CIO 43 '"- 2�0 40�0N benzene BRL(<2) 5 � �° 001. ethylbenzene BRL(<10) 00y4 000_ y. toluene BRL <10 1000 � ( ) " 50 OOOS„ ;. xylene BRL(<10) °+:r 10 000 50�OOA naphthalene BRL(<10) 20 t 6 000 MTBE BRL(<10) 70 �,SU;OUQ� MW 4 ,•war , C5 to C8 BRL(<20) BRL(<20) NOT x 400± C9 to C12 43 BRL(<20) TESTED ' 4 000 : 20�0MU, C9 to C10 73 23 200 1 �"4 M benzene BRL(<1) BRL(<1) 5�wkl°r< f 0 ethylbenzene BRL(<5). BRL(<5) 7umm "000` s toluene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) xylene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 000 50 000 naphthalene BRL <5) BRL <5) 6 000 MTBE BRL(<5) BRL(<5) [f70S000O SEA-1 T� ' CS to C8 NOT 850 NOT 400? •• 40 } �* C9 to C12 TESTED 2,300 TESTED 4'000 r y' C9 to CIO 6,600 200 z K4 000 c�' � oo benzene 9 55: 7.000 /' ethylbenzene 470 1 a 70U 41000 ;ka toluene 62009 SO,000i xylene 2,730 1.0000 ,�'50;000 naphthalene 280 20 "_. f 6 T . MTBE BRL(<10) SEA-2 C5 to C8 NOT 34 NOT 400 4 000� C9 to C12. TESTED 500 TESTED 4 000 ti 20 00� '� i C9 to CIO 770 = 200w; 4 000• benzene BRL(<I) T�00 , ethylbenzene BRL(<5) 70 Out) toluene BRL(<5) 1 000 }yam 0004;: . xylene BRL(<5) 07000 naphthalene 13 MTBE BRL(<5) a70 =t ;50�OOQ Bold text indicates results that exceed applicable groundwater c3degory(s) Shaded areas designates appropriate groundwater categor/si APPENDIX E ENNETT A 'REILLY Inc. ngineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Lined PO Box 1667 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision 4 Brewster,MA 02631 Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Licensed Site Professional Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax QUALITY ASSURANCE & QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM Quality Assurance& Quality.Control Program For Soil and Groundwater Sampling INTRODUCTION The Quality Assurance & Quality Control' QA/QC) Program outlines- the purpose, policies, organization and operations to support sampling work conducted by BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC... The procedures and protocal represented herein are consistent with the MA DEP "Standard References for Monitor Wells" [WSC-310-91], and the recommendations of a MA certified laboratory.- Implementation of this program will help to ensure the validity of data used to provide . professional engineering and environmental opinions to clients. The following definitions are used in the QA/QC Program: Quality Assurance refers to the concepts used in defining a system for verifying and maintaining a desired level of quality in a product or process. Quality Control is a specific step-by-step description of how the Quality Assurance Program will be carried out. This QA/QC Program guides field sampling activities. Project specific QA/QC Programs are adopted when warranted. Modifications to the QA/QC Program may be made only after specific approval by the QA/QC Officer(Project Manager). I 1 The specific objectives of the QA/QC Program are to: 1. specify the level of quality of each field procedure used in collecting samples; 2. identify deficiencies in field procedures which might affect the quality of data; and 3. require sufficient documentation to verify the credibility of the sampling methods employed. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY The Project Manager of BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., is responsible for the quality of work -produced. The Project Manger directs the QA/QC Program to document the control of field efforts and resulting data. In this capacity,the Project Manager is expected to do the following: 1. . prepare detailed QC Plans; 2. obtain analytical and sampling procedures reference materials; I 3. ensure that all field test and measurement equipment is maintained and calibrated properly; 4. monitor quality assurance activities to ensure conformance with authorized policies, procedures, and sound practices, and recommend improvements as necessary, 5. ensure that all field sampling is conducted in accordance with guidelines contained herein, 6. oversee all field sampling efforts to detect conditions which might directly or indirectly jeopardize the.utility of resulting analytical data, such as improper calibration of equipment or cross-contamination through improper storage of samples; 7. ensure that sample handling procedures are adequate for the sample types received; 8. inspect the quality of purchased sampling materials. 2 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT, COLLECTION,AND PREPARATION Introduction Sample management and stringent documentation are essential for successful quality assurance. The procedures in this section are designed to ensure collection of samples which truly represent the matrix being sampled by eliminating trace levels of contaminants from external sources. Sample Management The management of samples,up to the point of delivery to the laboratory for analysis,is under the supervision of the Project Manager,who shall ensure that samples are collected,labeled,preserved, stored, and transported according to the prescribed methods. If significant deviations from the sampling protocol occur,resulting in a suspected compromise of the sample integrity, all samples collected during the sampling effort prior to correction of the procedure will be discarded and fresh samples collected. Sample Collection Groundwater Monitoring wells will be sampled in accordance with the following sampling procedures: 1. Identify the well and record the well number on the groundwater sampling record an an Monitoring Well Sampling Log(attached). I 2. Open the well cap and measure total organic volatile (TOV) concentrations at the wellhead with the use of a portable photoionization detector. Record levels detected. 3. Measure groundwater level to the nearest 0.01 foot from the top of the well casing using a water level indicator. Record water level on a Monitoring Well Sampling Log (attached). Water level indicators will be decontaminated between wells. 4. The volume of standing water in the well casing will be calculated and recorded on the Monitoring Well Sampling Log. At least three well volumes will be purged either by pump or disposable bailer. Newly installed monitoring wells will be developed by purging at least'ten volumes. Purging of wells will be complete when either dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity or temperature has stabilized'relative to previous sampling rounds. Once the purging is complete,wells will be screened for each of the above parameters and recorded on the Sampling Log 5. Samples will be collected using either a disposable bailers or pump. Samples will be transferred into appropriately sterilized/preserved containers, taking care to minimize agitation of the sample [Refer to attached "Recommended Sample Containers..." Groundwater Analytical]. 3 6. Sample containers will be properly labeled with tags provided by the laboratory. Samples will be logged in on a chain-of-custody form. 7. Samples taken for precipitate metal analysis will be acidified to a pH of less than 2.0 in the field. When sampling water for volatile compounds, care must be exercised to prevent loss of compound through evaporation, and to control susceptibility to outside contamination. Precautionary measures include: 1. avoiding engine exhaust,gasoline containers,degreasing solvents,solvent-laden rags and non-compatible decontamination agents; 2. sampling bottles will only be opened at the time of sampling and quickly closed after collecting the sample,preventing aeration of the sample with the atmosphere or any other gas; 3. slowly filling bottles to capacity with sample and securing cap without entraining air bubbles; 4. inverting the bottle while tapping lightly to check for air bubbles; 5. adding additional sample to eliminate air bubbles if present,repeating steps 3 and 4; 6. placing samples on ice(approximately 4°C)immediately after collection in a dark, dry location; 7. segregating samples with a secondary barrier such as zip-lock bags, etc.; and 8. analyzing sample as soon as possible within the specific holding times after collection. Pump tubing will be decontaminated as follows: 1. Pump non-phosphate detergent solution through system for two minutes. 2. Pump clean hot tap water through system for two minutes or until clear,whichever, is longer. 3. Pump analyte-free water through system for two minutes. 4. Seal tubing ends; wrap and label with date of cleaning. 4 Soils When collecting and screening soil samples,the procedures to be used are: l. Prior to sampling surficial locations,surface vegetation,rocks,leaves,and debris will be cleared from the sample point to allow collection of a clean soil sample. If surficial soil samples are to be collected,a hand trowel or shovel and spatula will be used. The sampling equipment will be decontaminated as outlined below. 2. Boring samples will be collected via drilling rig-operated split spoon procedures. Soil samples collected from excavations or test pits will be collected directly with an auger (if necessary) from grade to approximately four feet below grade. Samples collected at deeper depths will be obtained directly from the bucket of the backhoe., A stainless steel spatula will be used to remove soil from the backhoe bucket for placement in the appropriate sample containers. 3. Soil samples collected. for TOV screening will be placed in glass soil jars with aluminum foil placed under the screw cap. Samples will be allowed to warm to ambient temperature before screening or will be screened in a heated vehicle after warming. The jar will be shaken for fifteen seconds prior to warming and after warming to ensure proper headspace development. Total organic vapors will be measured via a portable photoionization detector (PID) and their concentration recorded either on a Geological Borehole Log or field log. 4. Soil samples will.be stored and shipped in appropriate sealed containers. 5. Sample containers will be marked to indicate sampling date, time, location, and depth. Samples will be logged in on chain-of-custody forms (copy attached). 6. The stratigraphy of each soil boring and test pit excavation,and the construction of each monitoring well will be recorded by the on-site geologist on the appropriate Geologic Borehole Log or test"pit field log(copies attached). When sampling soils for volatile compounds, care must be exercised to prevent loss of compound and to control susceptibility to outside contamination. Precautionary measures include:. l. avoiding engine exhaust,gasoline containers,degreasing solvents,solvent-laden rags and non-compatible decontamination agents; 2. opening sampling bottles only at the time of sampling and quickly closing after collecting the sample; 3. placing samples on ice(approximately 4° Q immediately after collection in a dark, dry location; 5 4. segregating samples with a secondary barrier such as zip-lock bags, etc.; and 5. analyzing sample as soon as possible within the specific holding times after collection. Soil sampling equipment (shovel, auger, etc.) will be decontaminated between each sampling location with a potable water rinse, alconox soap wash, and a final potable water rinse. Drilling and excavating apparatus (augers, rods, casing, core barrels, backhoe bucket, and other equipment coming in contact with the borehole or excavation)will be decontaminated between each boring and excavation via steam cleaning. If necessary,an alconox soap wash followed by a steam cleaning will be included. Sample Preservation To prevent or retard the degradation/modification of chemicals in samples during transit and storage, the samples will be refrigerated at or below 4° C in appropriately preserved containers. Samples will be delivered to the laboratory by courier or by overnight delivery service. DATA MANAGEMENT Logging of Samples The accountability of a sample begins when the sample is taken from its natural environment. Sample handling (chain-of-custody) records must be completed at the time of sampling. The following chain-of-custody procedure must be implemented by the Field Team Leader to assure sample integrity. 1. The samples are under custody of the Field Team Leader if a. they are in his (or her)possession; b. they are in view after being in possession: I c. they are locked up or sealed securely to prevent tampering; or, d. they are in a designated secure area. 2. The"original"of the sample handling form must accompany the samples at all times after collection. A copy of the sample handling form is kept by the Field Team Leader. 3. When samples are transferred in possession, the individuals relinquishing and receiving will sign, date, and note the time on the form. 6 The Sampling Handling Record will contain information to distinguish each sample from any other sample. This information will include: 1. the project for which sampling is being conducted; 2. the matrix being samples (air, groundwater, soil, etc.); 3. the sampling date and time; 4. field sample identification number and chain-of-custody identification number; 5. the number and type of containers and the type'of preservative used (if any); and, 6. signature of the person performing the sampling. Each sample will be assigned a unique identification number,which will be marked on the sample container. The sample handling record will be forwarded to the laboratory with the samples. As a precaution against this record being lost or altered,the sampling personnel'will retain a copy of the sampling handling record documenting all information up until the first change of sample custody. This record will be filed by the Project Manager. Sample Identification Numbers Reporting of date to the data management system will require the assignment of a unique identification number to each sample collected(including quality control samples).. A record will be maintained by the Project Manager to associate the field sample with the various identification numbers used to analyze the field sample. Specific sample identification procedures are developed for each field sampling effort by the Project Manager. FORM SAMPLES BENNETT & OtREILLY, Inc. MONITOR WELL SAMPLING LOG 1573 Main Street,P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 Engineering and Environmental Services (508)896-6630 FAX(508)896-4687 CLIENT DATE(S) TIME: TIDE: LOCATION JOB NUMBER SAMPLER MEASURING POINT GROUND SURFACE OR T.O.C: T.O.C. Elev.of Total Standing Water Dissolved Depth to Static Volume HNU Well reference Depth Water Table Conductivity Temperature Water Volume Purged PI-101 pH Oxygen Comments: Number point of Well (feet) Height Elevation (gallons) ) (PP-) (mg/L)(gallons) (F) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) i NOTES: 1573 Main Street,P.O.Box 1667 BENNETT & OREILLY, Inc. Brewster,MA 02631 Engineering and Environmental Services (508) 896-6630 MONFOR WELL SAMPLING LOG CLIENT DATE(S) LOCATION JOB# MEASURING POINT SAMPLER GROUNDSURFACE OR T.O.C. Well Elev. of Total Depth to Standing Water Static Volume. HNU Comments Number reference.- Depth of Water Water Table. Volume Purged PI-101 point Well (Feet) Height Elevation (gallons) ; (gallons)-. (ppm), (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) NOTES: BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. 1573 Main Street,P.O. Box 1667 Brewster MA 02631 Engineering and Environmental Services, (508) 896-6630 MONITOR WELL SAMPLING LOG RESPIRATION ANALYSIS CLIENT DATE(S) LOCATION JOB # SAMPLER Well Total Approx. Standing Length of HNU Methane Oxygen Carbon Comments: Number Depth of Depth to Water screen PI-101 (%CH,) M OZ1 Dioxide Well Water Height above (ppm) (%CO,, (feet) (feet) (feet) SWL NOTES: BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. ' Sheet of 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-8964687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 Job Number: Date: Time: Test Hole Number: Job Name: Witness: Casing I. D.: Ground Elevation: Reference Elevation(TOC): Falling Head ❑ Rising Head ❑ Aquifer Saturation Thickness (If Confined): Depth of Boring(A): Well Screen Length(L): Length of Test Section(L): Depth.of Groundwater.Table(H): Depth of Top of Test.Section.(B).: Type.of Material in.-Test-.Zone:. . Notes: TIME ELAPSED WATER ACTIVE 2r (sec.) TIME(sec.) h/Ho DEPTH(x) HEAD(h) X H B STATIC A _ L —I 2R 1-- h=H-X(falling head) or h=X-H (rising head) Ho=H-Xo (falling head) or Ho=Xo-H (rising head) Xo=X at t=0 A,B, H&L are defined above. Witness: Pump & low Rate Location: TOO: Location: TOO. Location:. TOO: NOTES: Time Time Depth to Water Static Water Lv. Draw Down Depth to Water Static Water Lv. Draw Down Depth to Water Static WaterLv. Draw Down pH/Cond./Temp. (sec). 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 30 (sec.) 45 . (min) 1 2 3 4 5 6 . 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 — 50 60 70 80 90 100 190 280 370 460 550 640 730 820 910 1000 BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. Sheet of 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 Sieve Analysis Data and Computation .Sheet Job Number: Date: Job Name: Sample Number: Sample Collected By: Sample Tested By: Notes SIEVE WEIGHT PERCENT CUMULATIVE' PROJECT OPENING SIEVE RETAINED RETAINED PERCENT MANUAL MILLI- MESH IN GRAMS (Cumulative) FINER SPECIFICATION METERS (Cumulative) I PASSED MESH SIEVE TOTAL Sample Weight Wet: Sample Weight Dry: Percent Moisture: Sample Weight Passed Through Sieves: BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. Sheet of 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 Job Number: Date: Job Name: SAND GRAVEL SILT SAND Test Hole Number: El � Witness: Drilling Contractor: PEAT CLAY Sampling Method: GEOLOGIC BOREHOLE.LOG Type Well Lithology/Sediment Blows per 0 of ithology Depth of Depth Specification.&Remarks Description Sample 6"Drive Recovery . PID Response (ppm) 5 10 15 20 25 swL: 30 35 40 45 50 BENNETT&O'REILLY,Inc. Project Name: Sheet 1573 Main St.,P.O.Box 1667 Project Location: Boring No. Brewster,MA.02631 Project Number: Location Surface Elev. Groundwater Readings Casing Sampler Core Start Date Date Reading Type Finish Date 1 Size I.D. Driller 2 Hammer Wt. Inspector 3 Hamer Fall Sample Sampling Inches TOV SPT Well Depth type-No. Depth(ft) Pen Rec Blow Count 6" Reading N-Value Soil Description Installation 5-ft 10-ft 15-ft 20-ft Sand Cohesive Soils Granular Soils Sample Type NOTES: Gravel < 2 =very soft < 4 = very loose SS-split spoon Sand/Gravel 2-4 .= soft 5-10 =loose ST-Shelby tube Silt/Sand 4-8 =medium stiff 11-30 = medium AF-aguer flights Top/Sub Soil 8-15 = stiff 30-50 dense RC-rock core Clay 15-30 =very stiff > 50 =very dens MA-Microliners Fill > 30 =Hard HA-Hand Auger BENNETT & O'REILLY Inc. REPORT NUMBER: 508-896-6630 1573.Main Street 508-896-4687 Fax PO Box 1667 Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS . Job Number: . Date: Job Name: Feature: Contractor: Type of Work: Weather Conditions: Temperature: Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) Equipment irruse or idled.(identify which) . I Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies Summary of construction activities FAX(508)756-4475 )roject Name: Firm: TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST yohlilns semiralilllee -PaeVaertrlPCae Metal Petro eom mur6oe' W.M. e- General Chemistry Other ❑STANDARD(10 Business Days) d'BBte ° 'roject Number: Address: ❑ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) 3 ❑ RUSH(RAN- 1 S Sg (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) o ❑ ❑ ❑ £ a o ;ampler Name: City/State/Zip: g Please FAX ❑ YES ❑ NO FAX Number: ' 7 I _ rr ❑ 'roject Manager: Telephone: BILLING o o o o a o g Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: ❑ D NSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates). ' a _ ° ❑ g 1 o ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ° o a o ;ampling Matrix Type Contalner(s) Preservation Flltero o $ e $LAB a ' ° $o a .s o 0 SAMPLEBER ORATORY CATIO a ❑ a a Oa (LabUse Only)IDENTIFI ❑ O 5 g 2 AR ' y oF g S o o a o o a a s o ❑ ❑ o a ❑ 9 0101010101010 o � o a REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES 5 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specific OC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require project Relinquished]by Sampler: Date Time Received by: Receipt Temperature: ❑MA DEP Form specific OC.Project specific OC Includes Sample Duplicates, ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory OC Is Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC ❑RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples. Relinqulsh eA by: Date Time Received by: Shipping/Alrbill ❑MA MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional Number: Reportable Concentrations sample aliquot. ❑RCGW-1 ❑RCS-1 Project Specific OC Required Selection of OC Sample Relinquished by: Date Time Received by Laboratory: Custody Seal/ ❑RCGW'-2 O RCS-2 ❑Sample Duplicate ❑ N Selected by laboratory Cooler Serial umber: ❑MA Dredge Disposal ❑Matrix Spike O Please use sample: ❑NH❑RI❑CT❑ME Method of Shipment:❑GWA Courier❑Express Mail ❑Federal Express Specify Category:_� 0 Matrix Spike Duplicate ❑UPS 0 Hand❑ �vY1�oT�c�1.�oR�m81$s,1N� _MA CERT.NO•N-A4 063 449 SYX 130 SAND16C , NA 02565 50d( •6460) 1-600-339-6460 LAB USE ONLY: FAX(5016) -64.46 TER ANALYSIS REQUISITION. TE: DATE RECEIVED: SAMPLE NO.: TIME: NO. COPIES: T DAY SERVICE BY 5:00 PM 20.00 Surchar a PICK UP: MAIL: E: WATER LOCATION: NE: ,LING ADDRESS: SAMPLED BY: MENT/AMT. RECEIVED: WELL SPECS.: TO/AMT.: - — — Lab use only. LYSIS REQUESTED: WATER SAMPLE TYPE: FHA-HUDNA HETERO-TROPHIC PLATE COUNT COPPER NEW WELL COLIFORM BACTERIA LEAD EXISTING WELL 77PH ARSENIC TOWN WATER CONDUCTANCE SILICA IRRIGATION NITRATE-N ZINC FILTER/CONDITIONER NITRITE-N TDS MISCELLANEOUS SODIUM TANNINS NEW MAIN IRON SULFIDE TITLE 5 MANGANESE SILVER POOL SPA CHLORINE POTASSIUM RCRA 8 CALCIUM IOC's COLIFORM BACTERIA MAGNESIUM - SEC. CONT. PSEUDOMONAS HARDNESS FLUORIDE HETEROTROPHIC PLATE COUNT ALKALINITY OTHER ANALYSIS REQUESTED: SULFATE FECAL COLIFORM CHLORIDE METHOD: DEP SAMPLES COLOR VOLATILE ORGANICS PWS#: TURBIDITY METHOD: SAMPLE SITE: .FREE CO2 METALS Cie. Sink) AMMONIA-N METHOD: SAMPLE LOCATION: ODOR (ie. Kitchen/Well) UCTIONS: BACTERIA-Obtain sterile sample bottle. Remove.strainer/aerator from faucet. Turn on cold water. Allow it to run (5)five minutes. Fill container. Do not touch the inside of the bottle or the cap with anything. POTABLE WATER SAMPLE- Follow instructions for bacteria. Sample size approximately 500 mis. LEAD-Call lab for instructions. VOLATILE ORGANICS/METALS- Call lab for instructions. 449 Route 130 Address: Proj. No. Project Name: Sandwich, MA 02563 .(508)888-6460/ 1-800-339-6460 Sampler: FAX (508)888-6446 Phone#: Signature: Fax#: Field No. Date Time Comp Grab Station Location Container Pres. Sample type Analysis Requested Relinquished: DatelTime Received: Reliqulshed: Date/Time Received: Rellnquished: Date/Time Received: Relinquished: Daterrime Received: TECHNICAL REFERENCE SAMPLERECOMMENDED I I HOLDING TIMES Volatile Organics by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Parameter Method Matrix Minimum Recommended Containers(s)' Required Holding Qty.1 Preservation Time8 Cool to 4°C' Volatile EPA Aqueous 40mL 3 x 40mL VOA Vials12 HCl to pH<24 14 Days Organics 8260B Remove Chlorine' 1 x 40mL VOA Vial with Methanol Cool to 4°C' Volatile EPA Soil 40mL and 3 x 40mL VOA Vials with Methanol and 14 Days Organics 8260B Sodium Bisulfate and 1 unpreserved Sodium Bisulfate y container for percent moisture Cool to 4°C' Wastewater 12 HCl to pH<2' Volatile EPA 624 Aqueous 40mL 3 x 40mL VOA Vials Remove 14 Days Organics Chlorine' Drinldng Cool to 4°C' Water EPA Aqueous 40mL 3 x 40mL VOA Vials" HCl to pH<2' 14 Days Volatile 524.2 Remove Organics Chlorine' Volatile Organics by Gas Chromatography(GC) I Parameter Method Matrix Minimum Recommended Containers(s)' Required Holding Qty.1 Preservation Time' Cool to 4°C' Volatile EPA 12 HCl to pH<24 Organics gEPA Aqueous 40mL 3 x 40mL VOA Vials Remove 14 Days Chlorine' GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED iHOLDING 1 x 40mL VOA Vial with Methanol Volatile EPA Cool to 4°C' Organics 8021B Soil 40mL and 1 unpreserved container for Methanol 14 Days percent moisture Wastewater Cool to 4°C' Volatile EPA 601 Aqueous 40ML 3 x 40mL VOA Vials" Remove 14 Days Organics Chlorine' Wastewater Cool to 4°C' Volatile EPA 602 Aqueous 40mL 3 x 40mL VOA Vials" HCl to pH<24 14 Days Remove Organics Chlorine' Semivolatile Organics by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Parameter Method Matrix Minimum Recommended Containers(s)' Required Holding Qty.' Preservation Time' Semivolatile EPA 2 x 1L Amber Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C' Organics 8270C Aqueous 1L w/teflon liner" Remove 7 Days' Chlorine Semivolatile EPA Soil 30g Glass Jar w/teflon liner" Cool to 4°C3 14 Days10 Organics 8270C Wastewater Cool to 4°C' 2 x 1L Amber Glass Bottle Semivolatile EPA 625 Aqueous 1L w/teflon liner" Remove 7 Days9 Organics Chlorine GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED 1 PRESERVATION, i HOLDING Pesticides,PCBs and Herbicides by Gas Chromatography (GC) Parameter Method Matrix Minimum Recommended Required Holding Qty,' Containers(s)' Preservation Time' 2 x 1L Amber Glass Cool to 4°C' Organochlorine EPA Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" , 7 Days 9 Pesticides 8081A Remove Chlorine Organochlorine EPA Glass Jar w/teflon Pesticides 8081A Soil 30g liner" Cool to 4°C' 14 Days10 2 x 1L Amber Glass s PCBs EPA 8082 Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" Remove to 4°Cne' 7 Days PCBs EPA 8082 Soil 30g Glass Jar w/teflon Cool to 4°C' 14 Days10 liner 17 PCBs in Oil EPA 8082 Organic 5g 1 x 40mL VOA Vial None 14 Days10 Modified Liquid 3 x 40mL VOA Cool to 4°C3 EDB and DBCP EPA 8011 Aqueous 40ml, Vials" Remove to pH<24 14 Days Remove Chlorine EDB in Soil EPA 8011 Soil 30g 1 x 60mL Glass Jar Cool to 4°C' 14 Days Modified w/septum cap 2 x 1L Amber Glass Chlorinated EPA Cool Herbicides 8151A Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner Removet ° s Chlorine' 7 Days Chlorinated EPA Soil 30g Glass Jar w/teflon Cool to 4°C' 14 Days10 Herbicides 8151A liner 17 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED 1 PRESERVATION, 1 1 Organophosphorus EPA 2 x 1L Amber Glass? Cool to 4°C' 9 Pesticides 8141A Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner Remove Chlorine' 7 Days Organophosphorus EPA Soil 30g Glass Jar w/teflon Cool to 4°C' 14 Days10 Pesticides 8141A liner 17 Wastewater 2 x 1L Amber Glass Cool to 4°C'Check Organochlorine EPA 608 Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" pH;Adjust 5_96; 7 Day?Pesticides Remove Chlorine' 2 x 1L Amber Glass s Wastewater PCBs EPA 608 Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" RemoCol to °Chlorine' 7 Days Wastewater 2 x 1L Amber Glass Cool to 4°C3 Chlorinated EPA 615 Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" Remove Chlorine' 7 Days9 Herbicides Drinking Water EDB [EPA 5041 Aqueous 40mL Y 3 x 40mL VOA Cool to 4°C3 Add 14 Days and DBCP , q Vials" Sodium ThiosulfateZb 2 x 1L Amber Glass HCl to pH<24 Drinking Water EPA 508.1 Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" Cool to 4°C' 14 Days" Chlorinated Pesticides Remove Chlorine24 2 x 1L Amber Glass Cool to 4°C' Drinking Water EPA 515.1 Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" , 14 Days23 Herbicides Remove Chlorine Drinking Water 2 x 1L Amber Glass HCl to pH<24 Semivolatile Organics EPA 525.2 Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" Cool to 4°C' 14 Days22 Remove Chlorine24 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED SAMPLE CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION, and HOLDING Monochloroacetic Drinking Water Acid Buffer at pH 3 Carbamate Pesticides EPA 531.1 Aqueous 60mL 2 x 60mL Glass Vial Cool to 4°C' 28 Days Remove Chlorine' 2 x 500mL Amber Cool to 4°C' Drinking Water PA 548.1 Aqueous 250mL Glass Bottle w/teflon Add Sodium 14 Days" Endothall liner" Thiosulfate16 Drinking Water Diquat 2 x 1L Black Plastic Cool to 4°C' 27 and Paraquat EPA 549.2 Aqueous 1L Add Sodium 7 Days Bottle Thiosulfate26 Add NH4C1 Drinking Water 3 x 40mL Amber Cool to 4°C' 28 Haloacetic Acids EPA 552.2 Aqueous 40ML VOA Vials12 Add Sodium 14 Days (HAAs) Thiosulfate21 Petroleum Hydrocarbons by Gas Chromatography(GC) Parameter Method Matrix Minimum Recommended Required Holding Qty.1 Containers(s)2 Preservation Time' Hydrocarbon 2 x 1L Amber Glass Fingerprint ASTM Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" Cool to 4°C'H2SO4 7 Days D3328-90 to pH<2 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED SAMPLE CONTAINERS,PRESERVATION, and HOLDING TIMES Hydrocarbon Fingerprint ASTM Glass Jar w/teflon D3328-90 Soil 30g liner" Cool to 4°C' 14 Days` EPA 8100 2 x 1L Amber Glass? Cool to 4°C'HZSO, 9 TPH by(GC/FID) Modified Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner to pH<2" 7 Days EPA 8100 Glass Jar w/teflon Cool to 4°C' 14 Da s10 TPH by(GC/FID) Modified Soil 30g liner" y EPA 8100 2 x 1L Amber Glass? Cool to 4°C'H2SO4 9 API DRO Modified Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner to pH<2" 7 Days API DRO EPA 8100 Soil 30g Glass Jar w/teflon Cool to 4°C' 14 Days10 Modified liner API GRO EPA 8015 Aqueous 40mL 3 x 40mL�VOA Cool to 4°C34 14 Days Modified Vials HCl to pH< 1 x 40mL VOA Vial with Methanol and 1 EPA 8015 Cool to 4°C' API GRO Modified Soil 40ML unpreserved Methanol 14 Days container for percent moisture 2 x 1L Amber Glass CT ETPH CT ETPH Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" Cool to 4°C' 7 Days9 Glass Jar w/teflon Cool to 4°C' 14 Days" CT ETPH CT ETPH Soil 30g liner" y GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES 2 x I Amber Glass Cool to 4°C'H SO ME DRO ME 4.1.25 Aqueous 1L Bottle wheflon liner" to pH<2"Z 4 7 Days' ME DRO ME 4.1.25 Soil 30g Glass Jar w/teflon Cool to 4°C' 14 Days10 liner 17 ME GRO ME 4.2.17 Aqueous 40mL 3 x 40mLVials s12 Cool to HCl to pH<2<24 14 Days 1 x 40mL VOA Vial with Methanol and 1 Cool to 4°C' ME GRO ME 4.2.17 Soil 40mL unpreserved Methanol 14 Days container for percent moisture MA DEP VPH MA DEP Aqueous 40mL. 3 x 40mL�VOA Cool to 4°C'4 14 Days VPH 1998 Vials HCl to pH<2 1 x 40mL VOA Vial with Methanol and 1 MA DEP VPH MA DEP Soil 40mL unpreserved Cool to 4°C' 28 Days VPH 1998 container for percent Methanol moisture 2 x I Amber Glass PH DEP Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner" Cool to p4°C'H2SO4 14 Days10 MA DEP EPH E to H<2 13 MA DEP EPH MA DEP Soil 30g Glass Jar w/teflon Cool to 4°C' 7 Days' EPH 1998 liner 17 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED 1PRESERVATION, i HOLDING Hazardous Waste Characterization Analyses Parameter Method Matrix Minimum Recommended Required Holding Qty' Containers(s)' Preservation Time8 TCLP/SPLP Volatile EPA 2 x 125mL Glass Vial Organics 1311/1312 Solid16 150g w/teflon septum cap16 'Cool to 4°C' 14 Days19 EPA 8260B EPA TCLP/SPLP Metals, 1311/1312 Semivolatiles, EPA 18 Glass Jar w/teflon ° s 28 Days19 Pesticides and 6010B/7470A Solid 300g liner„ Cool to 4 C 14 Days19 Herbicides EPA 8270C EPA 8081A EPA 8151A Ignitability EPA 1010 Solid 50g Glass or Plastic Jar None None Modified Corrosivity(as pH) EPA 9045C Solid 50g Glass or Plastic Jar Cool to 4°C' None Reactivity SW-846 Solid 50g Glass or Plastic Jar Cool to 4°C' None Free Liquids EPA 9095 Solid 100g Glass or Plastic Jar None None GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED SAMPLE CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION, andHOLDING Metals by ICP,GFAA and CVAA Parameter Method Matrix Minimum Recommended Required Holding Qty.' Containers(s)Z Preservation Time' Total Metals(except EPA 6010B Aqueous. 100mL Plastic Bottle HNO3 to pH<2 180 Days Mercury) Dissolved Metals Filter First'HNO3to (except Mercury) EPA 6010B queous 100mL Plastic Bottle pH<2 180 Days Total Metals(except Glass or Plastic Mercury) EPA 6010B Soil 15g Bottle Cool to 4°C3 180 Days Total Mercury EPA 7470A Aqueous 100mL Plastic Bottle HNO3 to pH<2 28 Days Dissolved Mercury EPA 7470A Aqueous 100mL Plastic Bottle Filter First"p HNO3 to 28 Days Total Mercury EPA 7471A Soil 15g Glass or Plastic Cool to 4°C3 28 Days Bottle Wastewater and Drinking Water Total EPA 200.7 Aqueous 100mL Plastic Bottle HNO3 to pH<2 180 Days Metals(except Mercury) GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL PRESERVATION,RECOMMENDED SAMPLE CONTAINERS, Wastewater Dissolved Filter First'�HNO3 to Metals(except EPA 200.7 . Aqueous 100mL Plastic Bottle pH<2 180 Days Mercury) Wastewater and Drinking Water Total EPA 245.1 queous 100mL Plastic Bottle HNO3 to pH<2 28 Days Mercury Wastewater Dissolved EPA 245.1 Aqueous 100ML Plastic Bottle Filter First"HNO3 to 28 Days Mercury pH<2 Colorimetric Methods for Metals Speciation Parameter Method Matrix Minimum Recommended Required Holding Qty.1 Containers(s)Z Preservation Time' SM 3500- Hexavalent Cr D EPA Aqueous 100mL Plastic Bottle Cool to 4°C3 24 Hours 7196A Chromium, EPA Soil 15g Glass or Plastic Cool to 4°C3 30 Days Hexavalent 7196A Bottle Iron,Ferrous SM 3500- Analyze Fe D Aqueous 100ML Plastic Bottle None Immediately GROUNDWATER . ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED SAMPLE CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION, and HOLDING Inorganic Analyses Parameter Method Matrix Minimum Recommended Required Holding Qty' Containers(s)' Preservation Time' Acidity SM 2310.B Aqueous 100ML Plastic or Glass Cool to 49C' 14 Days r Bottle Alkalinity SM 2320 B Aqueous 100ML Plastic or Glass Cool to 4°C' 14 Days PA 310.2 Bottle BOD SM 5210 B Aqueous 1L Plastic or Glass Cool to 4°C3 48 Hours Bottle CBOD SM 5210 B Aqueous 1L Plastic or Glass Cool to 4°C' 48 Hours Bottle EPA 325.2 Plastic or Glass Chloride EPA 300.0 Aqueous 50mL Bottle None 28 Days EPA 9251 Chlorine,Total SM 4500- Plastic or Glass Analyze Residual Cl G Aqueous 200mL Bottle None Immediately � I Chemical Oxygen SM 5220 D Aqueous SOmL Plastic or Glass H2SO4 to pH<2 2g Days Demand(COD) Bottle Cool to 4 C3 LAqueSM 2120 B Plastic or Glass Color ous SOmL Bottle Cool to 4°C' 48 Hours GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED . and 1 Cyanide,Amenable to Plastic or Glass Remove Sulfide14 Chlorination EPA 335.1 Aqueous 500mL Bottle NaOH to pH>12 14 Days Cool to 4°C' EPA 335.3 EPA 335.4 Plastic or Glass Remove Sulfide 14 Cyanide,Total EPA Aqueous 500mL Bottle NaOH to pH>12 14 Days Cool to 4°C' 9012A SM 4500-F Fluoride C EPA Aqueous 300mL Plastic Bottle Only None 28 Days 300.0 SM 5540 C Plastic or Glass � MBAS(Surfactants) Aqueous 250mL Bottle Cool to 4°C' 48 Hours I SM 4500- Aqueous 4 OOmL Plastic or Glass H2SO4 to pH<2 28 Days Nitrogen,Ammonia NH3 G Bottle Cool to 4°C' SM 4500- Plastic or Glass Nitrogen,Nitrate NO3 F Aqueous 100ML Bottle Cool to 4°C' 48 Hours EPA 300.0 Nitrogen,Nitrate SM 4500- Plastic or Glass (Chlorinated Drinking NO3 F Aqueous 100ML Bottle Cool to 4°C' 14 Days Water) EPA 300.0 SM 4500- Plastic or Glass Nitrogen,Nitrite NO3 F Aqueous 100ML Bottle Cool to 4°C' 48 Hours EPA 300.0 Nitrogen,Nitrate plus SM 4500- Plastic or Glass H2SO4 to pH<2 Nitrate NO3 F Aqueous 100ML Bottle Cool to 4°C' 28 Days GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED 1PRESERVATION, i HOLDING Nitrogen,Total Plastic or Glass H2SO4 to pH<2 Kjeldahl(TKN) EPA 351.2 Aqueous SOOmL Bottle Cool to 4°C' 28 Days Odor SM 2150 B Aqueous 200mL Glass Bottle Only Cool to 4°C3 24 Hours Oil and Grease, SM 5520 B 1 x 1L Amber Glass H2SO4 to pH<2" Gravimetric EPA 1664 Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner Cool to 4°C' 28 Days EPA 9070 Organic Carbon,Total SM 5310 B Plastic or Glass H2SO4 to pH<2 (TOC) EPA 9060 Aqueous 25mL Bottle Cool to 4°C' 28 Days Oxygen,Dissolved M 4500-0 Aqueous 300mL Glass Bottle Only None Analyze G Immediately SM 4500- Plastic or Glass Analyze PH H+B EPA Aqueous 25mL Bottle None Immediately 9040B Petroleum SM 5520 1 x 1L Amber Glass H2SO4 to pH<2" Hydrocarbons,Total CF Aqueous 1L Bottle w/teflon liner Cool to 4°C' 28 Days (TPH-IR) EPA 420.2 1 x 1L Amber Glass? H2SO4 to pH<2 Phenolics,Total EPA 420. Aqueous 500mL Bottle w/teflon liner Cool t PH 28 Days SM 4500-P Filter(0.45 µm) Phosphate,Ortho F Aqueous SOmL Glass Bottle Only Cool to 4°C3 48 Hours SM 4500-P Plastic or Glass H2SO4 to pH<2 F Aqueous 50mL Bottle Cool to 4°C' 28 Days Phosphorus,Total GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED PRESERVATION, and HOLDING Phosphorus,Total SM 4500-P Plastic or Glass H2SO4 to pH<2 (Low-level 0.005 E Aqueous 50mL Bottle Cool to 4°C' 28 Days mg/L) Solids,Settleable(SS) SM 2540 F Aqueous 1L Plastic or Glass Cool to 4°C3 48 Hours Bottle Solids,Total(TS) SM 2540 B Aqueous 100ML Plastic or Glass Cool to 4°C' 7 Days Bottle Solids,Total SM 2540 C Aqueous 100ML Plastic or Glass Cool to 4°C' 7 Days Dissolved(TDS) Bottle Solids,Total SM 2540 D Aqueous 100ML Plastic or Glass Cool to 40C3 7 Days Suspended(TSS) Bottle Solids,Total Volatile SM 2540 E Aqueous 100mL Plastic or Glass Cool to 4°C' 7 Days (TVs) Bottle Solids,Volatile SM 2540 E Aqueous 100ML Plastic or Glass Cool to 49C' 7 Days Suspended(VSS) Bottle Solids,Volatile EPA 2540 Aqueous 100ML Plastic or Glass Cool to 4°C3 7 Days Dissolved(VDS) E Bottle SM 2510B Plastic or Glass Specific Conductance EPA Aqueous 100mL Bottle Cool to 4°C' 28 Days 9050A SM 4500- Sulfate SO4 F EPA Aqueous 50mL . Plastic or Glass Cool to 4°C' 28 Days 300.0 EPA Bottle 9056 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED SAMPLE CONTAINERS,PRESERVATION, and HOLDING SM 4500- Plastic or Glass NaOH to pH>9 Sulfide S2 D Aqueous 500mL Bottle 2mL Zinc Acetate 7 Days Cool to 4°C' Turbidity SM 2130 D Aqueous 100ML Plastic or Glass Cool to 4°C' 48 Hours Bottle Microbiological Analyses Parameter Method Matrix Minimum Recommended Required Holding Qty.' Containers(s)' Preservation Time' Wastewater Total SM 9222 B Cool to 4°C' Coliform(Membrane Aqueous 100mL Sterilized Bottle Remove Chlorine' 6 Hours Filtration) Wastewater Fecal SM 9222 D Cool to 4°C' Coliform(Membrane Aqueous 100ML Sterilized Bottle Remove Chlorine' 6 Hours Filtration) Drinking Water Total SM 9222 B Cool to 4°C' Coliform(Membrane Aqueous 100ML Sterilized Bottle Remove Chlorine' 30 Hours Filtration) Drinking Water Total SM 9223 B Aqueous 100ML Sterilized Bottle Cool to 4°C' 30 Hours Coliform(Colilert) Remove Chlorine' Drinking Water Fecal SM 9222 D Aqueous 100ML Sterilized Bottle Cool to 4°C' 7 30 Hours Coliform(Membrane Remove Chlorine Filtration) GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL PRESERVATION,RECOMMENDED SAMPLE CONTAINERS, Drinking Water E. SM 9222 Aqueous 100mL Sterilized Bottle Cool to 4°C' 7 30 Hours Coli SM 9223 Remove Chlorine Heterotrophic Plate Cool to 4°C' Count(Standard Plate SM 9215 Aqueous 100mL Sterilized Bottle Remove.Chlorine' 30 Hours Count) Sampling Notes 1. The minimum quantity specified is the minimum amount of sample material necessary to perform the analysis.This quantity allows for no margin of error. For some analyses,Groundwater Analytical recommends specific types and numbers of containers(e.g.,an Aqueous Volatile Organic sample requires 3 x 40mL Glass Vials w/teflon septum caps).In such cases,the recommended container(s)allow for an adequate margin of error. For other analyses,Groundwater Analytical only recommends a general type of container(e.g.,a Solid Semivolatile Organic sample requires a Glass Jar w/teflon liner).In such cases,it is strongly recommended that twice the minimum quantity of sample material be collected in the recommended type of container. For solid samples,in addition to the minimum quantities required for individual analyses,each sample also requires 20g of sample material for a percent solids(or percent moisture)determination.Example:A soil sample collected for TPH-IR(30g), 8 RCRA Metals(2.6g)and PCBs(30g)requires a minimum of 62.6g of material for the desired analyses,and 20g of material for percent solids(or percent moisture),for a total required minimum of 82.6g of material.It is then recommended that this minimum be doubled,and at least 165.2g of sample material be collected in a Glass Jar w/teflon liner. For solid samples,all minimum quantities are calculated net of all foreign objects,such as sticks,leaves and rocks. 2. Only sample containers pre-cleaned according to US EPA protocols are recommended.Appropriate pre- cleaned and pre-preserved containers are available from Groundwater Analytical.Pre-cleaned sample containers should not be pre-rinsed with sample prior to sample collection.Pre-rinsing may cause elevated results. i 3. Samples should be immediately cooled,stored and shipped refrigerated.4°C(34T)is the recommended temperature for most analyses.Refrigeration retards biological degradation,reduces the volatility of compounds,retards the hydrolysis of non-aqueous compounds,reduces absorption effects and prevents continuing chemical reactions. 4. Adjust to pH<2 with Hydrochloric Acid(HCl).Acidification retards biological action,reduces absorption effects and prevents the formation of precipitates and/or complexes. Sulfuric Acid(HZSO4)or Sodium Bisulfate(NaHSO,)may be substituted for HCl in EPA Methods 8021B,8011,and 8260B. GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED 1 PRESERVATION, and HOLDING 5. Adjust to a pH range of 4.0 to 5.0 with Hydrochloric Acid(HCl),Sulfuric Acid(HZSO,)or Sodium Hydroxide(NaOH). 6. If sample will not be received by laboratory within 24 hours of collection,then adjust to specified pH range with Sulfuric Acid(HZSO,)or Sodium Hydroxide(NaOH).The pH adjustment may be omitted if it is performed upon receipt at the laboratory within 24 hours,and may be omitted if the sample is extracted within 48 hours of collection. 7. If free chlorine is present in the sample,then Sodium Thiosulfate(NaZS,O,)should be added.Free chlorine can react with organic compounds to form chlorination by-products.Free chlorine is likely to be found in chlorinated municipal drinking waters and treated wastewaters. Sodium Thiosulfate,a reducing agent,is added to remove the free chlorine.For most levels of free chlorine,add 4 drops of 10%Sodium Thiosulfate to samples in 40mL vials,and add 5mL of 10%Sodium Thiosulfate to samples in 1 L bottles. 8. The listed Holding Time is the maximum time a sample may be held between collection and initiation of analysis or extraction. 9. Samples must be extracted within 7 days of collection.Extracts must then be analyzed within 40 days of extraction. 10. Samples must be extracted within 14 days of collection.Extracts must then be analyzed within 40 days of extraction. 11. Samples for dissolved metals must be filtered prior to preservation with Nitric Acid(HNO,).Filtration must be done with a 0.45 micron membrane filter.Field filtration and preservation is preferred. However,if field filtration is not possible,samples should be cooled at 4°C and shipped to the laboratory for filtration and preservation.Filtration must be done as soon as practical after collection.Groundwater Analytical recommends that filtration be done within 24 hours of collection.If samples are not going to be field filtered,do not preserve samples with Nitric Acid(HNO,). 12. Aqueous samples samples for Volatile Organic Analyses(VOA)must be collected without any headspace or air bubbles.Volatile organics dissolved in water tend to volatilize readily and will fill any air bubble available in the vial.Particularly with low level samples,this results in a loss of material upon opening the vial.VOA vials must be filled slowly until the liquid forms a meniscus on the rim of the vial.The cap should then be gently placed on the vial,taking care not to disturb the crown of liquid,and firmly rotated tight.The vial should then be examined to verify the absence of all air bubbles. 13. Adjust to pH<2 with Sulfuric Acid(HZS04).Alternatively,Hydrochloric Acid(110)may be used. 14. Maximum holding time is 24 hours when Sulfide is present. Samples may be tested with lead acetate paper before the pH adjustment in order to determine if Sulfide is present.If Sulfide is present,it can be removed by the addition of Cadmium Nitrate powder until a negative spot test is obtained.The sample is then filtered,and NaOH is added to adjust the pH>12. GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED SAMPLE CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION, and HOLDING 15. Adjust to pH<2 with Nitric Acid(HNO,)or Sulfuric Acid(H,SO,).Acidification retards biological action, reduces absorption effects and prevents the formation of precipitates and/or complexes. 16. Samples should be collected with a minimum of aeration.The sample bottle should be filled completely, excluding all headspace,and capped. 17. Extractable organic samples are susceptible to Phthalate ester contamination.Phthalate ester contamination is generally caused by sample contact with a plastic material,particularly flexible plastics.Use care to avoid sample contact with any plastic,other than Teflon. 18. Specified quantities of sample material are for only single phase solid samples(i.e.no free liquids).Liquid phase or multiple phase samples require different quantities of sample material.Contact laboratory for advice prior to collecting liquid phase or multiple phase samples for TCLP analyses. 19. Samples for TCLP Volatile Organics analysis must be leached within 14 days of collection.The leachate must then be analyzed within 14 days of leaching. Samples for TCLP Metals analysis must be leached within 28 days of collection,if Mercury is being analyzed.The leachate must then be analyzed within 28 days of leaching.If Mercury is not being analyzed, then samples for TCLP Metals must be leached within 180 days of collection,and the leachate analyzed within 180 days of leaching. Samples for TCLP Semivolatile Organics,TCLP Pesticides,and TCLP Herbicides analyses must be leached within 14 days of collection.The leachate must then be extracted within 7 days of leaching.The extract must then be analyzed within 40 days of extraction. 20. Samples must be analyzed within 7 days of collection.However,if Heptachlor is not being determined, sample holding time to analysis may be extended to 14 days. 21. Samples must be extracted within 7 days of collection.Extracts must then be analyzed within 14 days of extraction. 22. Samples must be extracted within 14 days of collection.Extracts must then be analyzed within 30 days of extraction. 23. Samples must be extracted within 14 days of collection.Extracts must then be analyzed within 28 days of extraction. 24. Add 40-50mg of Sodium Sulfite to each liter of sample to reduce free chlorine that may be present.Free chlorine can react with organic compounds to form chlorination by-products.Free chlorine is likely to be found in chlorinated municipal drinking waters and treated wastewaters.Alternatively,use 40-50mg of Sodium Arsenite.Do not use Sodium Thiosulfate,as it may produce a residue of elemental sulfur which may interfere with the determination of some analytes. 25. Samples must be extracted within 7 days of collection.Extracts must then be analyzed within 30 days of extraction. GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RECOMMENDED 1PRESERVATION, i HOLDING 26. Add Sodium Thiosulfate to reduce free chlorine that may be present.Free chlorine can react with organic compounds to form chlorination by-products.Free chlorine is likely to be found in chlorinated municipal drinking waters.Use approximately 80mg of Sodium Thiosulfate per liter of sample. 27. Samples must be extracted within 7 days of collection.Extracts must then be analyzed within 21 days of extraction. 28. Samples must be extracted within 14 days of collection.Extracts must then be analyzed within 7 days of extraction i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL. PROTECTION STANDARD REFERENCES FOR MONITORING WELLS SECTION 1.2 TABLE OF •.CONTENTS' Section 1.2 Page i January 1991 •SECTION 1.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Foreword 1.2 Table of Contents 1.3 Definitions 2.0 First Steps 2.1 Reconnaissance Surveys 2.2 work and Cost Plans (Reserved) 2.3 Health and Safety Plans 3.0 Subsurface Investigations 3.1 Exploratory Test Pits 3.2 Drilling Techniques 3.3 Borings in Contaminated Areas 3.4 In-situ sampling of Soil 3.5 soil Classification 3.6 In-situ sampling of Rock 3.7 Rock Classification 3.8 Laboratory Tests for Soil 3.9 Plugging Boreholes 4.0 Piezometers, observation wells and Monitoring wells 4.1 Monitoring well Network Design 4.2 Selection of well Construction Materials 4.3 well Installation Procedures 4.4 As-built Notes and Records 4.5 well Development 4.6 Decommissioning of Monitoring wells 5.0 Interpretation of Ground water and Aquifer Characteristics 5.1 water Level Measurements 5.2 In-Situ Hydraulic Conductivity Tests 5.3 " Pumping Tests 5.4 Packer Tests 5.5 surveying and Datum Planes 6.0 Sampling of Monitoring wells 6.1 , Quality Assurance/Quality Control 6.2 Sampling Techniques 6.3 Sample Handling 6.4 Chain of Custody 6.5 Decontamination of sampling Equipment Section 1.2 Page ii January 1991 Section 1.2 Table of Contents (continued) 7.0 Computer Models (Reserved) 8.0 Geophysical Techniques (Reserved) Date: Y /c` / a ' TOWN OF BARNSTABLE TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ON-SITE INVENTORY NAME OF BUSINESS: Pu,,b30e;t4j o� �/�C-��'► BUSINESS LOCATION: 33 60 22H Sm- l be" INVENTORY MAILING ADDRESS: It to a.dox /d TOTAL AMOUNT: TELEPHONE NUMBER: S0 "' r7'7S"-- ?t l ZZ • S CONTACT PERSON: 7� �- �'u-''t�� e'✓' d � ' EMERGENCY CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER: MSDS ON SITE? Nv. TYPE OF BUSINESS: az�4 /4j,ee,,e.( +0 � INFORMATION/RECOMMENDATIONS: leu.� Fire District: i�'15J7 5 5(Lae_45 a?/yid PL.\a4e i s l Waste Transportation: Last shipment of hazardous.waste: Name of Hauler: Destination: Waste Product: Licensed? .Yes No NOTE: Under the provisions of Ch. 111, Section 31, of the General Laws of MA, hazardous materials use, storage and disposal of 111 gallons or more a month requires a license from the Public Health Division. LIST OF TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS The Board of Health and the Public Health Division have determined that the following products exhibit toxic or hazardous characteristics and must be registered regardless of volume. Observed/Maximum Observed/Maximum IS 04AAntifreeze (for gasoline or coolant systems) Misc. Corrosive NEW USED Cesspool cleaners 094 Automatic transmission fluid Disinfectants Engine and radiator flushes Road Salts (Halite) Hydraulic fluid (including brake fluid) Refrigerants $ Motor Oils Pesticides NEW USED (insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides) Gasoline, Jet fuel, Aviation gas Photochemicals (Fixers) Diesel Fuel, kerosene, #2 heating oil NEW USED 1 2- Misc. petroleum products: grease, Photochemicals (Developer) lubricants, gear oil NEW USED Degreasers for engines and metal Printing ink Degreasers for driveways & garages Wood preservatives (creosote) Caulk/Grout Swimming pool chlorine Battery acid (electrolyte)/Batteries Lye or caustic soda Rustproofers Misc. Combustible Car wash detergents Leather dyes Car waxes and polishes Fertilizers Asphalt & roofing tar PCB's Paints, varnishes, stains, dyes Other chlorinated hydrocarbons, Lacquer thinners (inc. carbon tetrachloride) NEW USED Any other products with "poison" labels ✓� Paint &varnish removers, deglossers (including chloroform, formaldehyde, Misc. Flammables hydrochloric acid, other acids) Floor &furniture.strippers Other products not listed which you feel Metal polishes may be toxic or hazardous (please list): Laundry soil & stain removers (including bleach) Spot removers &cleaning fluids .(dry cleaners) Other cleaning solvents Bug and tar removers d Windshield wash WHITE COPY-HEALTH DEPARTMENT/CANARY COPY-BUSINESS Date: TOWN OF BARNSTABLE f� TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ON-SITE INVENTORY NAME OF BUSINESS: kr"�d O i ICc�y�a�.y BUSINESS LOCATION: =33 6o 5n- m. (S aa,,4L INVENTORY MAILING ADDRESS: to. c7,gox 1 a TOTAL AMOUNT: TELEPHONE NUMBER: SO$ — 7'75`--371 I tS22 • pl ��s CONTACT PERSON: -�� YYO�i/.t- (SZ.c.�.iii e-*"' , dw -r' EMERGENCY CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER: MSDS ON SITE? Nu. TYPE OF BUSINESS: a_&�( c14c�*C-4 c 'Y' /lleer,( +& INFORMATION/RECOMMENDATIONS: l./ecrQ 0 Fire District: 015� .Gem Waste Transportation: ��� Last shipment of hazardous.waste: Name of Hauler: Destination: Waste Product: Licensed? .Yes No NOTE: Under the provisions of Ch. 111, Section 31, of the General Laws of MA, hazardous materials use, storage and disposal of 111 gallons or more a month requires a license from the Public Health Division. LIST OF TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS The Board of Health and the Public Health Division have determined that the following products exhibit toxic or hazardous characteristics and must be registered regardless of volume. Observed/Maximum Observed/Maximum IS Antifreeze (for gasoline or coolant systems) _ Misc. Corrosive ✓ NEW USED Cesspool cleaners ZO Automatic transmission fluid Disinfectants Engine and radiator flushes Road Salts (Halite) Hydraulic fluid (including brake fluid) Refrigerants Motor Oils Pesticides ✓ NEW USED (insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides) Gasoline, Jet fuel, Aviation gas Photochemicals (Fixers) Diesel Fuel, kerosene, #2 heating oil NEW USED • Misc. petroleum products: grease, Photochemicals (Developer) lubricants, gear oil NEW USED Degreasers for engines and metal Printing ink Degreasers for driveways & garages Wood preservatives (creosote) Caulk/Grout Swimming pool chlorine Battery acid (electrolyte)/Batteries Lye or caustic soda Rustproofers Misc. Combustible Car wash detergents Leather dyes Car waxes and polishes Fertilizers Asphalt & roofing tar PCB's Paints, varnishes, stains, dyes Other chlorinated hydrocarbons, Lacquer thinners (inc. carbon tetrachloride) NEW USED Any other products with "poison" labels 3 Paint &varnish removers, deglossers (including chloroform, formaldehyde, Misc. Flammables hydrochloric acid, other acids) Floor &furniture.strippers Other products not listed which you feel Metal polishes may be toxic or hazardous (please list): Laundry soil & stain removers (including bleach) Spot removers & cleaning fluids .(dry cleaners) Other cleaning solvents Bug and tar removers Windshield wash WHITE COPY-HEALTH DEPARTMENT/CANARY COPY-BUSINESS a Town of Barnstable-Health Department Page 1 ` HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY SITE VISITS DBA: Hubbard Oil Company,Inc. Fax: Corp Name: 'Airport Exxon Mailing Address Location: .33 Brooks Road,Hyannis Street: P.O.Box 10 mappar: City: Hyannis Contact: ;Thomas Fournier State: Ma Telephone: 508-775-3711 Zip: 02601 Emergency: Person Interviewed: Business Contact Letter Date: 7/28/2OnA Category: Fuel Inventory Site Visit Date: 8/ /200 Type: Oil Distributers Follow Up/Inspection Date: d❑ public water ❑ indoor floor drains ❑ outdoor surface drains ❑ license required ❑ private water ❑ indoor holding tank mdc ❑ outdoor holding tank mdc ❑ currently licensed ❑d town sewage ❑ indoor catch basin/drywell R outdoor catch basin/drywell expir ❑ on-site sewage ❑ indoor on-site syste ❑ outdoor onsite system date: . ........ .._ 2000-building heated by oil;Above ground fuel tank-275 gal. compliance: Satisfactory e Page 2 Town of Barnstable-Health Department HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY Chemicals: ❑ Zero Toxic Waste Materials ❑ gty's>25 Ibs dry or 50 gals liquid but less than 111 gals gty's 111 gals or more description: qty: unit of measure motor oil 11'cases Windshield Wash _ _ 21gallons antifreeze(for gasoline or coolant systems) �— 61gallons _ cts:grease, _5luuite other-eleeRiaQ-satvents _6,uuits• Waste Transporter: Fire District: Last HW Shipment Date: Waste Hauler Licensed: No I 1 N �(� tAI) 3 ,v I � q0 . Date: B/9' / a V TOWN OF BARNSTABLE TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ON-SITE INVENTORY NAME OF BUSINESS: 14szb-lnt;r� o it C crrL. �l'ye-• BUSINESS LOCATION: 33 60css-K5 bad INVENTORY MAILING ADDRESS: it ' to tqox i 0 TOTAL AMOUNT: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 5-09-- ''7-75— ( I 922 . - ga-Zlem CONTACT PERSON: E1761:tsim44- EMERGENCY CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER: MSDS ON SITE? /Jo. TYPE OF BUSINESS: av( Alee,�,t 4n o+kAAhL INFORMATION/RECOMMENDATIONS: �� Fire District: rh S 5 ( GLyt.,�,.,i s Waste Transportation: �i4 Last shipment of hazardo0s waste. Name of Hauler, Destination: Waste Product: Licensed? Yes No NOTE: Under the provisions of Ch. 111, Section 31, of the General Laws of MA, hazardous materials use, storage and disposal of 111 gallons or more a month requires a license from the Public Health Division. LIST OF TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS The Board of Health and the Public Health Division have determined that the following products exhibit toxic or hazardous characteristics and must be registered regardless of volume. Observed/Maximum Observed/Maximum ntifreeze (for gasoline or coolant systems) Misc. Corrosive NEW USED Cesspool cleaners #Automatic transmission fluid Disinfectants Engine and radiator flushes Road Salts (Halite) Hydraulic fluid (including brake fluid) Refrigerants Motor Oils Pesticides NEW USED (insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides) Gasoline, Jet fuel, Aviation gas Photochemicals (Fixers) Diesel Fuel, kerosene, #2 heating oil NEW USED 4sLUmisc. petroleum products: grease, Photochemicals (Developer) lubricants, gear oil NEW USED Degreasers for engines and metal Printing ink Degreasers for driveways & garages Wood preservatives (creosote) Caulk/Grout Swimming pool chlorine Battery acid (electrolyte)/Batteries Lye or caustic soda Rustproofers Misc. Combustible Car wash detergents Leather dyes Car waxes and polishes Fertilizers Asphalt & roofing tar PCB's Paints, varnishes, stains, dyes Other chlorinated hydrocarbons, Lacquer thinners (inc. carbon tetrachloride) NEW USED Any other products with "poison" labels Paint &varnish removers, deglossers (including chloroform, formaldehyde, Misc. Flammables hydrochloric acid, other acids) Floor& furniture strippers Other products not listed which you feel Metal polishes may be toxic or hazardous (please list): Laundry soil & stain removers (including bleach) Spot removers &cleaning fluids (dry cleaners) Other cleaning solvents Bug and tar removers d —OaAWindshield wash WHITE COPY-HEALTH DEPARTMENT/CANARY COPY-BUSINESS i BEN NE A 109 REILtY Inc. 0 Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line PO Box 1667Brewster,MA 02631 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Q Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Licensed Site Professional Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax March 4, 2004 RECEIVED02-3 90 Mr. Bert Fournier MAR 0 8 2004 c/o Ms. Evelyn Read TOWN OF BARNSTABLE HUBBARD OIL COMPANY, INC. HEALTH OEPT. P.O. BOX 10 Hyannis MA, 02601 RE: DISCOVERY OF PAHs IN GROUNDWATER Hubbard Oil Company Inc. -RTN 4-0824 Y 33 and 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map.14, Parcel 125 and126] -Hyannis,MA. 02601 Dear Ms. Read, This correspondence is in followup to our previous letter,dated February 26,2004,wherein we informed you of the presence of several Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in groundwater, above the applicable standards, in several downgradient monitoring wells on the Robies property. Since then BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.has had the opportunity to secure and review the full list of PAH analytes concentrations from historic groundwater and soil analysis: Results of groundwater analysis from monitoring wells on the downgradient Robies property were reviewed from as far back as October 2002,wherein BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.asked the laboratory to report the full PAH list for the analysis as prior to June 2003, previously only requesting the target 4 PAH analysis associated with virgin fuel oil impact as consistent with the historic use of the property. Please be advised that the laboratory records of such historic analysis did no allow for the low-level Reporting Limits to meet the RCGW-1 Standards in that mass spectrometry was not conducted at the time of such testing. Although no higher molecular coal tar related PAH compounds were detected in the historic groundwater testing reviewed,the detection limits and analytical sensitivity do no preclude the possibility that such compounds were present at the time of historical testing. These compounds,however,were not present in the monitoring wells at the Hubbard property in the most recent testing conducted in February of 2004. BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC. also requested the laboratory to report the full list PAH's for soil samples previously collected as part of the Phase H Investigation from the subject Hubbard property in October 2002. In this testing,.the Reporting Limits did meet the RCS-1 Standards. All the arIglysi�s reviewed reported fractional EPH concentrations. Two of the four samples did not i MARCH 4,2004 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC/BROOKS RD.BO02-3490 PAGE 2 OF 3 DATA REVIEWNALIDATION-PAH DISCOVERY report any PAHs above the method Reporting Limit. In the TB-4 sample with the greatest degree of petroleum impact,low-level concentrations of PAH's were reported for the compounds 2-methyl naphthalene,phenanthrene,acenaphthene and fluorene as typical of a fuel oil source. In the TB-10 sample, low-level concentrations of PAH's for the compounds fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene and benzo(g,h,i)perylene were reported. Although several of the compounds reported in the TB-10 sample are associated with coal tar derivatives, none of the concentrations of PAHs reported were above the Method 1 - Risk Characterization Standards or at concentrations exceeding published Background .(MA DEP Technical Update). It is further noted,in consideration of the source,that no such compounds were detected in the most recent groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells on the Hubbard property and that distribution of PAH constituents reported in groundwater at the Robies property is dissimilar to those historically reported in soils at the Hubbard property. Based on the historic distribution and concentrations of PAH's in soils at the Hubbard property, and the current spacial and temporal occurrence of PAH's in groundwater at the Robies property alone,it appears that the likely source of coal tar derivatives is associated with the railway wherein historic and current uses utilize creosote treated.timbers. _. BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.would like to restate its previous recommendation that the Barnstable Water Company test their wells for semi-volatile compounds as a precautionary measure in review of any critical exposure pathways. We would appreciate being copied on such testing and provided with copies of any future testing of volatile organic compounds and/or inorganic compounds. BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. will continue to sample and analyze groundwater samples from the Hubbard and Robies properties as specified within the Remedial Operation Plan. This data will continue to be made public as reported to the MA Department of Environmental Protection and copied to the Town of Barnstable and the Barnstable Water Company. Should you have any questions, or need additional information,please contact me at your convenience. B NNE 'RE LY, INC. D id C. ett,LSP JD. T de a- i dt Direc or of nviro ental Services Project Manager encl. Groundwater Analytical Results"Groundwater Analytical Inc." (Groundwater- sampled 10/23/02 & 11/4/02, both dated 2/24/04) (Soil- sampled 10/01/02; dated 3/l/04) Table 1: MA DEP Identified Background Levels in Soil from Technical Update Document MARCH 4,2004 HUBBARD OEL CO.,INC/BROOKS RD.BO02-3490 PAGE 3 OF 3 DATA REVIEWNALIDATION-PAH DISCOVERY CC. Laura Stanley, Sites Management-MA DEP (SERO) Attorney Robert Fasanella-RUBIN&RUDMAN, LLP John Robichaud, President-Robies Refrigeration David Condry-Barnstable Water Company Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department Thomas McKean-Barnstable Board.of Health John,Klimm-Barnstable Town Manager, c/o Barbara Harris,Town Counsel Commonwealth of Massachusetts,c/o Executive office of Transportation and Construction- (Railroad easement owners) REVO MAR 0 2 2004 GROUNDWATER Groundwater Analytical, Inc. P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL - Buz Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 February 26, 2004 FAX(508)759-4475 www.groundwateranalytical.com Mr.John Tadema-Wielandt Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 LABORATORY REPORT AMENDMENT Project:_ Hubbard Oil Co. Brooks Rd./B002-3490 Lab I D: 54995 Received: 10-02-02 Dear John: Enclosed are the amended.analytical results for the above referenced project. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a sample receipt report detailing the samples received, a project narrative indicating project changes and non-contormances, a quality control report, and a statement of our state certifications. The analytical results contained in this report meet all applicable.NELAC standards, except as may be specifically noted, or described in the project narrative. This report may only be used or reproduced in its entirety. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Jonathan R. Sanford President J RS/smd Enclosures GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Brooks Rd./B002-3490 Delivery:. GWA Courier Temperature: 11.2C Client: . Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Airbill: n/a Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 54995 Lab Receipt: 10-02-02 Custody Seal(s): n/a ! tt }W N4 rr ` 3 ,. dx § th. �.}Y4u �tt'.u?.k,-, rm. 54995-1 TB-4:3-5' Soil 10/1/02 13:00 MA DEP EPH PAHs Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C138813 250 mL Glass Proline BX4385 None n/a n/a 07-01-02 t k t r s m s: c x wr 7 s w[ x cC y.Lab ID 1FieIdID< � � Matnx SampledrMethod 'w'� y� _ Notes ...�..ya#:.. ..2r...u,,.:�...,:._�.e•s ..s'�+z.. ,mom-.z,:,n..._..�.xv..ve.... fi1w::xw+.a._.+.s.- =..,N""'$.,a.,n5'E" t1s1s-.,X. 54995-5 T13-1:8-10' Soil 10/1/02 9:00 TPH by GC ASTM D3328-00 Mod Con ID Container' Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C144036 250mLGlass Proline BX4559 None n/a n/a n/a zLaki1D ° `FredID $+Rt3 i.fylatrix' Sampled Methodt� Wiz` to °' � s. s: e T�`rc ;Notes 54995-7 .,TB-6:13-15' Soil. 10/1/02 15:15 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C129412 60 mL Glass Industrial- BX4621 Methanol R-33821 1 08-08-02 1 08-16-02 C189237 40 mL VOA Vial n/a n/a None n/a n/a n/a axrlablD FieIdIDy e Matrix Sam led `M`eihod �3 gX •x....��=.�Su;C.o ;�}•w.cc V,1,A.*��'�Nxa'al��`�� .�+.�ft,`�-A:. P,..+m�l.?Raxz, E;.x,L*tr �'`.iff,�ei`Y„'..,;.�s,%.:il:'4.. 7,.`+.Rt. �u,.8c3x .�'s �$.s..fi. •a- .. .....�a,.- 54995-8 TB-6:18-20' Soil 10/1/02 15:30 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C129408 60 mL Glass Industrial BX4621 Methanol R-33821 08-08-02 08-16-02 C189232 60 mL Glass n/a n/a None n/a n/a n/a .Xm a�Lab ID * iField l>Du * ,z Matrzx i a Sam ledyMe�thod � T a1 a ,a z Notes 54995-9 TB-8:8-10' Soil 1012/02 10:00 MA DEP EPH PAHs Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C138816 250 mL Glass Proline BX4385 None n/a n/a 07-01-02 w,a"L' .. S 7 � ,.-q Y �•`t'�' Zr.. ra;'-•�.'�s t} i-'s"'. �° i 'k o'S1iG2 `�' '' -t' r t 5(.ru'�'S'K Lab IDt, t 4 FIeId IDc =a ms s. Matrix Y�;t Sampled �Me OVIN-•, �,` �F, aZ.1,.;��� �_ � Noted t���':��n,._,���'1e�3k. 54995-10 TB-8:18-20'' Soil 10/2/02 10:15 MA DEP EPH PAHs Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery' QC Lot Prep Ship C138818 250 mL Glass Proline BX4385 None n/a n/a 07-01-02 Lab lD -ah� FzeId81D�; L � �° � lvlat ixtSampledA ;a�Method- t � � w :ka....r'.;n3f ..x�>•:sf��,a�.8r��--rx _4�"s'< ��:°-Pt....rye."..,. a 54995-11 TB-10:13-15' Soil 10/2/02 13:00 MA DEP EPH PAHs Con ID Container Vendor QC.Lot Presery QC Lot Prep . Ship C138820 250mLGlass Proline BX4385 None n/a n/a 07-01-02 i z`' ,, s .+.+ re --•& •a� �-• nr -.,x ,ga a�.. C4 s.�: x- .,u r xa ti ,*. rtF�'s — kv < } '+; 4 .€-„r• ,: ;a;lab I D�a3 �L�F�eId2�D 'r` � M<tr�.�• ;,tr:Sar"p�ed��i,.MMethod�.�� � ,� : -�''�• At�� 54995-12 TB-11:3-15' Soil 10/2/02 14:00 TPH by GC ASTM D3328-00 Mod Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: TB-4: 3-5' Laboratory ID: 54995-01 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: EP-1538-M Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 10-01-02 Container: 250 mL Glass Received: 10-02-02 Preservation: Cool Extracted: 10-04-02 Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 10-17-02 Moisture: 8 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH,Ranges . Concentration Units Reportrg limit - - - _ - _ n-C9•to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t 840 mg/Kg 32 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 380 mg/Kg 32 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 430 mg/Kg 32 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' 440 mg/Kg 32 - -- CAS Number' PAH Analytes _,. '_ Concentration . `; Units Reporting Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene 3.3 mg/Kg 0.54 85-01-8 Phenanthrene 0.90 mg/Kg 0.54 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 0.71 mg/Kg 0.54 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 86-73-7 Fluorene 1.1 mg/Kg 0.54 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL mg/Kg 0.54 Q C Surro ate Co_ Recovery QC__Lrmits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 102 % 40-140% 2-13romonaphthalene 108 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 58 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 124 % 40-140% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.1.1? Yes Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative . and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Results are calculated on a dry weight basis. Method modified by use of microwave accelerated solvent extraction technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: TB-8:8-10' Laboratory ID: 54995-09 Project: Hubbard Oil Co.Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: EP-1538-M Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 10-02-02 Container: 250 mL Glass Received: 10-02-02 Preservation: Cool Extracted: 10-04-02 Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 10-17-02 % Moisture: 5 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH Ranges - Concentration Units:. Repofing limit - - n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 290 mg/Kg 30 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 76 mg/Kg 30 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 81 mg/Kg 30 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' 81 mg/Kg 30 CAS Number PAH Analytes Concentration Units Reporting Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 QC Surrogate Compounds Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79 % 40-140 % 2-13romonaphthalene 103 % 40-140 % Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 55 % 40-140 % ortho-Terphenyl 86 % 40-140 % QA/QC Certification s 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all perform ance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.1.1? Yes Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Results are calculated on a dry weight basis. Method modified by use of microwave accelerated solvent extraction technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: TB-8: 18-20' Laboratory ID: 54995-10 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: EP-1538-M Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 10-02-02 Container: 250 mL Glass Received: 10-02-02 Preservation: Cool Extracted: 10-04-02 Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 10-17-02 %Moisture: 3 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH Ranges a` Concentration Umts Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 130 mg/Kg 30 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 54 mg/Kg 30 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 79 mg/Kg 30 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons} 79 mg/Kg 30 CAS Number PAH Analytes'_ ,Concentration `: Units Reporting Limit _- 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL. mg/Kg 0.50 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anth race ne BRL mg/Kg 0.50 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyre ne BRL mg/Kg 0.50 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 4-. QC Surrogate Compounds Recovery, aT _ ,QC Limits . ---- Fractionation: 2-Fluor biphenyl 93 % 40- 140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene 110 % 40- 140 % Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 55 % 40- 140% ortho-Terphenyl 116 % 40- 140% Q Q ertrfication t . 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.1.1? Yes Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Results are calculated on a dry weight basis. Method modified by use of microwave accelerated solvent extraction technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: TB-10: 13-15' Laboratory ID: 54995-11 Project: Hubbard Oil Co.Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: EP-1538-M Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 10-02-02 Container: 250 mL Glass Received: 10-02-02 Preservation: Cool Extracted: 10-04-02 Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 10-17-02 %Moisture: 9 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 'E PH Ranges ,.< Concentration Units Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 55 mg/Kg 32 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 150 mg/Kg 32 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 79 mg/Kg 32 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 85 mg/Kg 32 G CAS Number ' PAH.Analytes Concentration Units Reporting Limit - - 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 206-44-0 Fluoranthene 0.64 mg/Kg 0.53 129-00-0 Pyrene 0.59 mg/Kg 0.53 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.70 mg/Kg 0.53 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.53 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.58 mg/Kg 0.53 QC Surrogate Compounds Recovery QC Limits - - Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 87 % 40- 140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene 70 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 57 % 40-140% . ortho-Terphenyl 78 % 40-140% f Y ' QA/QC Certification z 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.1.1? Yes Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Results are calculated on a dry weight basis. Method modified by use of microwave accelerated solvent extraction technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GR13UNLIWATER -ANALYTICAL Project Narrative Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Brooks Rd./8002-3490 Lab ID: 54995 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 10-02-02 13:40 %$'. Client Comm uni i caton �� 4>r 4f 1 A:Documentafion and, u 4 The following documentation discrepancies,and client changes or amendments were noted for this project: 1 Samples 54995-01,-09,-10,and-11 were reported by MA DEP EPH with all target analytes, per John Tadema- Wielandt,02-25-04. x B='Method Modifications-Non Conformancesand Observations ' The sample(s) in this project were analyzed by the references analytical method(s),and no method modifications, non-conformances or analytical issues were noted,except as indicated below: 1 . Project Non-conformance. Project 54995 was received at a temperature of 11.2'C. This measurement is outside the recommended range of 2-6'C. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 lib I 228 Main Street,P.O.Box 1200 GROUNDWATER Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ANALYTICAL AYTICdf1/ Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER N2 053455 �°'#9@OB�IbC ® d'rABa FAX(508)759-4475 Project Name: Firm: TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST R'6,4 o�1& —l�:oaks ��. -9e�lA�{f 0`��Illy c, r � Valalttas Semlvolatlles PesVHerh/PCas PetroleumN roaareon Haz. STANDARD(10 Business Days) Exlmctahle Vo Metals Ext TPH Vol TPH Waale General Chemistry Other Project Number: Address: ( �/ ❑ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) � 0�-3 4�0 .1 M A-'6 S+•/Po Zog I��/ ❑ RUSH(RAN- ) F z a (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 3 0 o F Sampler Name: City/State/Zip: g n `(o� j Please FAX YES ❑ N x z v iye��5krr ��A .5� 00gC-�9�MIA FAX Number: N N o Project Manager: 11 Telephone: / 2 BILLING o 0 0 0 0 o a o e L�dG Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: a ° s INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates). o o g ° v P o ° 5 o Sampling Matrix Type Container(s) Preservation Fllte ea ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ 10i ❑ o o a a ❑ ❑ L ° _ € Y Q a z v ? 3 0 0 0 0 SAMPLE ao � � a ., J s LABORATOflY v, p s_` o o a ao sa 9 s ° 0 IDENTIFICATION a s ,, g - NUMBER �•' 2 _ - i g ❑ 8 U U ❑ ❑ 5 5 5 a 5 5 2 E (Lab Use Only) o E S. E S. 41 E s ` ID f o•t- I'rob 'T�-.( : g-ll) X J�( � ❑ ❑ IS o ❑ o a o a ❑ o ❑ X O't o2 o0 I 1?)7 3-5' A I X. X I jo )Jc2 �.15 —f, : 1. -I�" X1 I Xl?J 7 x ;o 4Z lo.00 ,-Q, 8 «, X X 10 z a r0:15 - 6: (e,-wr Xj� (D DZ Ir00 1 -117: I?,-15X Xi X I( 102OL zrOU .r V-11 �-►5� j .(y. ;-Z REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specific OC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require projectWiuish❑MA DEP Form specific gul Project specific OC Includes Sample Duplicates, Y PI Date Time Received by: Receipt Temperature, ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laborato OC is L T 7 G Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC ❑RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples, elin Ise by: D to Time Received by: Shipping/Airbill each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional Number: MA MCP(310 CMR 40) P P q (�� Reportable Concentrotiono sample aliquot, ��/ 6--'7 ••ti., a XI RCGW'-1 N RCS-1 Project Specific OC Required Selection of OC Sample Relinquished by: Date Time Re I ed y L atory: Custody Seal/ ❑RCGW-2❑ Number: RCS-2 ❑Sample Duplicate D Selected by laboratory 7 `// Cooler Serial ❑MA Dredge Disposal D Matrix Spike ❑Please use sample: ti M N'S ❑NH❑RI❑CT❑ME ❑Matrix Spike Duplicate Method of Shipment:M GWA Courier❑Express Mail ❑Federal Express a Specify Category: 0 UPS 0 Hand 0 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Assurance/Quality Control "A r Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification. standard.and a blank;. and excepting. GC/MS sequences,. all sequences close with a continuing., calibration standard. GUMS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12:. hour operating period,whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory contro[ sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation: batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. d�•-�2,F-F���1�k�W `$"['fib t` r'1 e1dF� vC+ TY. S.- ��T v�i� �i.. .`�. x'S �`2y'3}'-��K�d ?��,,F'^+�+i L �f �'�.yti"^F4.�i- '�; Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Perent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. ..Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical. method in.dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries'are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-1538-M Matrix: Soil Units: mg/Kg `CAS Number. ' Analyte Spiked { .,Measured :.., Recovery^ QC Limits 111-84-2 n-Nonane(C9) 3.3 1.5 45% 40-140% 629-59-4 n-Tetradecane(C14) 3.3 1.8 55% 40- 140 % 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(C19) 3.3 2.2 66% 40- 140% 112-95-8 n-Eicosane(C20) 3.3 2.3 68% 40-140 630-02-4 n-Octacosane(C28) 3.3 2.4 72 % 40- 140 0° 91-20-3 Naphthalene 3.3 1.6 48% 40- 140% 83-32-9 Acenaphtherie 3.3 1.9 58% 40- 140% 120-12-7 Anthracene 3.3 2.3 68% 40- 140% 129-00-0 Pyrene 3.3 2.5 74% 40-140 Z/- 218-01-9 Chrysene 3.3 2.3 70% 40- 140 QC Surrogate Compounds r• Recovery 0-fQC Limits ,. Fractionation: 2-Fl66robiphenyl 82 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 87 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 68 %. 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 70 % 40-140% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch I D: EP-1538-M Matrix: Soil EPH Ranges r "" ` `. Concentration, - Units, Reporting Limit -- - n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic HydrocarbonsT BRL mg/Kg 30 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons T BRL mg/Kg 30 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons TO= BRL mg/Kg 30 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL mg/Kg 30 CAS Number t Target Analytes, r`w Concentration W Units Reporting Limit - - -- _ 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 : QC Surrogate 64ipo—u T r Recovery' QC Limits' Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 88 % 40-140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene 91 % 40-140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 72 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 81 % 40-140% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Certifications and Approvals Groundwater Analytical maintains environmental laboratory certification in a variety of states. . Copies of our current certificates may be obtained from our website: http://www.groundwateranalZical.com/qualifications.htm Categories: Potable Water,'Wastewater,Solid Waste and Soil . http://www.dph.state.ct.us/B RS/Environmental_Lab/OutStateLabList.htm FL®RID"A�De artment'of:Health Bureau of Laboratorres Categories:SDWA,CWA, RCRA/CERCLA http://www.floridadep.orgliabs/qa/dohforms.htm k�'` 't�l'-'?�'`s"-.A `a��kw=��u3�'"a�°��1� �'�-���m�4 ci`g•". �. �� °`�"`�� y � �S'�?" ,� Categories: Drinking Water and Wastewater http://www.state.me.us/dhs/eng/water/Comp l i ante.htm ._.. ��_ �*��n�s'r^r fir'-4�Te• �3. �`t�h�'��t:���` .lA'"x�'��`aX" j£�3 `�"���'a�i �' '�_ •.� :: k," :vt's .. .. '�MA�SS�A�CH�USE�TTS�De artment ofX EnvtrgnmentalProtection; M MA�103��> '• Categories: Potable Water and Non-Potable Water http://www.state.ma.us/dep/bspt/we.s/fi les/certlabs.pdf xd +•F"� r.'.:y . S' ' S'.,=z`�i+.� ^j •`' 112§5� i a.ayx NEW HAMPSH4'RE,-0DepartmenfFof Env�ronmentalServicess, 2703 n4 � RM� Categories: Drinking Water and Wastewater http://www.des.state.nh.us/asp/NHELAP/Iabsview.asp NEWY®RK; partmentWwgWg. nfF^-1b7<5}'p4 , a s ' ra.�`t•.a` rt.'i'�5. r'A 's:�•,a�'Fxi4s> N F >�:..' F�.�'x;d•':. ..�7i'�i! "'d"r==.O I ��'i�5. Categories: Potable Water, Non-Potable Water and Solid Waste http://www.wadsworth.org/labcert/elap/comm.html .�48 l `:`'tYrt. la`. '!7"'r�M.+r . .ys^`'k yPp,ENaNSYLPVANIA;Depariw�tmRent�oyEnvironmentahProte<ction�, 68 665a PFi' ✓ , ti '*L'.ifil^t;+ZvF P?� '� F+;w1�. :}fif.t NAo, d!'Y!T9 .+•F1 ..S N 5 r Ir' v J:. �... >'•A&3 dT , Environmental Laboratory Registration(Non-drinking water and Non-wastewater) http://www.dep.state.pa.us/Labs/Registered/ 3 , �c � �* s: was y w RH,", ISLpAND partment of�Health U5�4 �� � F ,. Categories:Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage http://www.health ri.orgdab�s/IabsCT MA.htm s '4'r.'�``;el-V9 51 10VI r `�' 7 .tt'�° 3-- +C' s R' z NOW ` a a'+i Zy`�t` U S Depan en t of+Agricultd...- o1I Permit, S 539'2ti1 � Foreign soil import permit .V,.ERM®NTDepartment:of„Environmental Conservation Water Supp'Ly Division Q 9 ., asR Category: Drinking Water http://www.vermontdrinkingwater.org/wsops/labtable.PDF Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street,.Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i Table 1. MADEP Identified Background Levels In Soil Concentration in Soil Containing Coal Concentration Ash or Wood Ash in"Natural" Associated With Fill Soil Material OIL OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL mg/kg mg/kg ACENAPHTHENEZ 0.5 2 ACENAPHTHYLENE2 0.5 1 ANTHRACENE2 1 4 ALUMINUM' 10,000 10,000 ANTIMONY 1 7 ARSENIC 20. 20 BARIUM' 50 50 BENZO(a)ANTHRACENEZ 2 9 BENZO(a)PYRENE2 2 7 BENZO(b)FLUORANTHENEZ 2 8 BENZO(g,h,i)PERYLENE2 1 3 Massachusetts Department of BENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE2 1 4 Environmental Protection BERYLLIUM 0.4 0.9 One Winter Street CADMIUM 2 3 Boston,MA 02108-4746 CHROMIUM(TOTAL) 30. 40 CHkOMIUM(III) 30 40 ( Commonwealth of CHROMIUM(VI) 30 40 Massachusetts CHRYSENEZ 2 7 Jane Swift,Governor COBALT' 4 4 COPPER 40 200 Executive Office of DIBENZO(a,h)ANTH RACE NE2 0.5 1 Environmental Affairs FLUORANTHENEZ 4 10 FLUORENEZ 1. 2 Bob Durand,Secretary 2 INDENO(1,2,3-cd)PYRENE 1 3 IRON' 20,000 20,000 Department of LEAD 100 600 Environmental Protection MAGNESIUM' 5,000 5,000 Lauren A.Liss,Commissioner MANGANESE' 300 300 MERCURY 0.3 1 Produced by the METHYLNAPHTHALENE,2 2 0.5 1 Office of Research&Standards, NAPHTHALENE2 0.5 1 May 2002. NICKEL 20 30 Printed on recycled paper. PHENANTH.RENE2 3 20 PYRENE2 4 20 This information is available in SELENIUM 0.5 1 alternate format by calling our SILVER 0.6 5 . rdin'... , THALLIUM . 0.6 5 ;....; ADA Coordinator at (617)574 6872. VANADIUM' 30 30 ZINC 100 300 (Values rounded to one significant figure.) In the absence of fill-specific data,the"natural'soil value has been adopted. 2 In the absence of data specific to"natural"soil,a lower percentile value from the fill data set has been adopted.' background to 05232002.doc •Page 5bif 5"" FES 2 b 2004 GROUNDWATER Groundwater Analytical,Inc. P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL Buz Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 February 24 2004 FAX(508)759-4475 - www.groundwateranalytical.com Mr.John Tadema-Wielandt Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 LABORATORY REPORT AMENDMENT Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./B002-3490 Lab IQ: 55892 Received: 11-05-02 Dear John: Enclosed are the amended analytical results for the above referenced project.. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a sample receipt report detailing the samples received, a project narrative indicating project changes and non-contormances, a quality control report, and a statement of our state certifications. The analytical results contained in this report meet all applicable NELAC standards, except as may be specifically noted, or described in the project narrative. This report may only be used or reproduced in its entirety.. V attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report; please do not hesitate to contact me. I Sincerely, Jonathan R. Sanford President J RS/smd Enclosures GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./B002-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 2.6'C Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Airbill: n/a Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 55892 Lab Receipt: 11-05-02 Custody Seal(s): n/a 'D - Lab b IZ7 Matrix _"`Sampled . ;t- 55892-1 (RR)MW-6S Aqueous 11/4/02 16:15 MADE?E PH with PAHs Con ID Container I Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C137180 1 L Amber Glass I Proline BX4505 H2SO4 R-3353C 08-08-02 08-16-02 Lab ID i F1eld Matrix �sAnpliA Method z Notes 1A, 55892-2 (RR)MW-6D Aqueous 11/4/02 16:45 MA DEP EPH with PAHs Con.lD Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship:�� C772597 I LArnberGlass Proline BX5371 H2SO4 R-3421C 09-12-02 09-17-02 1 -—t.- —--.--- -.-- - Lab I-EP,�'- Field 'T ho�MAtri", rnp - -.,e 55592-3 (RR)MW-5S Aqueous 11/4/02 15:30 TPH by GC ASTM D3328-00 Mod Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C1 72593 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX5371 H2SO4 R-3421C 09-12-02 09-17-02 iS �npld4f— e6 Mthd"t 00d ;--.—1 , — e 11�, 1 Noie's'- La Matrix a 558924 (RR)MW-5D Aqueous 11/4/02 15:30 TPH by GC ASTM D3328-00 Mod Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C172589 I L Amber Glass Proline BX5371 H2SO4 R-3421C 09-12-02 09-17-02 Field Notes,'-1-1 6 1�6 e d-1 D.- I to I , jg,,- 77Ma, J�5 t;1 i� M 55 892-5 (RR)MW-55 Aqueous 11/4/02 1.530 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con 10 Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C203992 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5470 HC1 R-3173F 10-02-02 10-18-02 C203991 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5470 HCl R-3173F 10-02-02 10-18-02 La I D t Fie Samj Method Notes - 'k 41 55892-6 (RR)MW-5 D Aqueous 11/4/02 15:30 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C203989 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5470 HC1 R-3173F 10-02-02 10-18-02 C203990 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5470 HC1 R-3173F 10-02-02 10-18-02 Field A- Samp!,t. Method, Notes., 55892-7 (RR)MW-6S Aqueous 11/4/02 16:15 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C203980 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5470 HC1 R-3173F 10-02-02 10-18-02 C203979 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5470 HC1 F eldID, ' Matrix ', S4n'pled Method 55892-8 (RR)MW-6D Aqueous 11/4/02 16:45 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot_ Presery QC Lot Prep Ship r C203983 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5470 HC1 R-3173F 1 10-02-02 10-18-02 C203982 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5470 HCl R-3173F 1 10-02-02 10-18-02 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID. Field ID: (RR)MW-6S Laboratory ID: 55892-01 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: EP-1131-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 11-04-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 11-05-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 11-08-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 11-11-02 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH Ranges ,:�'� " ' 't°' Concentration Units Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 160 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons+ BRL ug/L 160 CAS Number 'Target Analytes Concentration Units Reporting imit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 10 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 10 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 10 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 10 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 10 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 10 206A4-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 10 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anth race ne BRL ug/L 10 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 10 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyre ne BRL ug/L 10 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 10 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 10 Compouds Recovery Surrogat C Limits -- Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 93 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 92 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 75 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 87 % 40-140% ' QA/QC Certrfication _ 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte'concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: (RR)MW-613 Laboratory ID: 55892-02 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: EP-1131-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 11-04-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 11-05-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 11-08-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 11-11-02 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 Reporting Lrmt n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 160 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons+ BRL ug/L 160 CAS Num_lier__ }'_ Tar et A_ nal es' _ _' ,,. Concentration :,t Unrts Re ortm Crmt g g. 91-20-3Naphthalene BRL ug/L 10 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 10 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 10 __. 86-73-7 Fluorene. BRL ug/L 10 208-96-6 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 10 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 10 20644-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 10 56-55-3 Ben zo[a]anth race ne BRL ug/L 10 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 10 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10: 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 10 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 10 F_ Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 93 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 92 % 40-140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 71 % 40-140 % ortho-Terphenyl 87 % 40-140% QA/QC Certrfrcafion s:- .�_ e., 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t. Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Project Narrative Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./B002-3490 Lab ID: 55892 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 11-05-02 16:10-_ " �:� a� y_rk-�`'' -x��k+v-.��,�r Y'ik,�,�y,�'".S,'i5.',.-'�5-�� �.'� '�°sj� '�� .�r.ry��"� �x•`°`r. '.�� ` � K� A�Documentat�on�andrClient Communication,,(" � � ��-�-��`"�EMIR, -jam k'c� z- x. .y -+`�•.,�. s ro;, , �. +L'4� i3, p, Li c..r y�'`S' x"i`'1 f'_` The following documentation discrepancies,and client changes or amendments were noted for this project: 1 . Samples 55892701 and-02 were analyzed by MA DEP EPH with all targets,per John Tadema-Wielandt,02-23-04. . _.. €+t: L _„,"+�,r 'A"' u' 3 Ash'=� �++ �±4Yb;X i"�' .. �'`w'p3: _ �3�,,� •'•.n• -'x-a..a.- t3. l`9 '"�'+ 's'X Gnf-�rmances The sample(s) in this project were analyzed by the references analytical method(s),and no method modifications, non-conformances or analytical issues were noted,except as indicated below: 1 . No method modifications,non-conformances or analytical issues were noted. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200;228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 iSR®16 NDW ATER Buzzards Main Street,P.O.Box 1200 Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ®lq�py����L Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER N265104 G'� FAX(508)759-4475 ANALYTICAL nl Project Name: Firm: I TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST d 1 1 1 votaOtes Semiwlalltae Pes erh oe, PeIrdeamH —fta az.H Cp.1.vk1 \ v �r -(/`� ❑STANDARD(10 Business Days) nana e o Metals a VW.TPH I wa:te General ch.mtr,ry seer Project Number: Address: g g _ �PRIORITY(s Business Days) o � OC)2-3`� 1 t��3 Met tti }• PV � `C� I ❑ RUSH(RAN- _ \ 0 0 0 0 $s^ o o(Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) aA Sampler Name: City/State/Zip: e Please FAX 1 YE(ySp p NO p•� a J 1�' / 1J1.3 '✓'l�/1r)s•i'� .t I'1 0�.1�3 ( FAX Number: �S (�"1�'� 1? 1 = _ 9 2 ❑ Project Manager: Telephone: O ( BILLING 0 0 0 0 201610 oo 5 08 CO) 6-V[V 30 Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: o o n a s s INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates). l - a g ° 0 S r I Sampling Matrix Type Container(s) Preservation RtemE a m o e o ❑ o 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ ° o 0 0 o e e $ eo e >: � e 0 ° 8 A W s egos ° 5 0 0 SAMPLE -o ., q LABORATORY s S o e a -, = O 0 ❑ O s° q a „ ❑ IDENTIFICATION o S ❑ T81- ,w W $ 5 ; a 5 g z e (Lab'NUMBER Use Only) 9 1 1 s 1 1 1 W ° 1 0 o . o 1 Cl t o 0 o a ❑ ° 0 0 ° o o ❑ o ° o a o li ❑ 0 0 o ❑ ° o ° ❑ ° o ° z"2 „^ :Utin1"\ �<� 7Y'I ... . .�. :;, '� J :7�'u.. ".t.::51:�,� .•t '�� 'k T��::r��iv. :.i t�._.'5.,� _ _ "5Ti�,.t. v t_.`F4 F r � _ 4;15 R 131 1 2 1 1 13 2 k „F NY. f is t.1�} 'n 7 a, "S. R 2" Ti if 4ui A+:-wC��.' :�_ 4 I ?- v,y'.. S'. -�' °.L.'^'.�> 1" '-, . ..'' `� -, :.T rc•I.. .. -/+.. ..<... .�' s '..c.. 5 .\,a}t.. iy1..i d Sf7. -. -..•.:: ^'afi?� :.:,,'•err:ass.,:. is o-r Pqt zs-. r r •d " a z< .t 4S . : .. �l;:b.; 3•. ... .y.r ..�..' ,r�'..i..iris�id ;. ._r..i'�)-S'. :x�y°...?rvV 3-,xx.C:xr.....:_....i`_,..�:. `SS?vv 1�...,Y �.y rL�'. r h a: V.:+' Y.:a_ M i- '.- '._''h td 's's 2.? .�. .,-.� t1.t- tyty;:�;-ti• >4..•R;i: `` S .. .e•.!-. .. < :tit 4 A♦ .o;, i 4 3 1 ".L•fr �, k A,R a •xr."*I .ors. ";r N<:��, ._'",,�,�,..� .:;t c_.,.._._..>: L :,;•;,:>" ...._..-_..�.;r•�'°,....�..�r.;. ��-: ���-r<s�,��:',z�� _5 r%.v':�.;: t.:N' x zi:ti.��;` n r - -- r .. :•µ •*1 i i' y 't '� ", !de h>=f. StE. ,iy ['.. r e• Q' !b ?ca?Sa 111, :e: )r•.i �•F 0-1, # � (�yy � �G.,sa, � a� ,�it �, ,a•fit•.a t.:.,I.•i ",' r .�_=a} M�'lA'S ,,y, ..� y 1.-4..}•:" �.J.w" 'k.1 Yi siS.1..a:.tK. .,�uts ..0.:...FE:s+a ..?�.�,..:r3,;,r, �•_k.:?y;� �,a..'.� is£e�r - �_Yk..��`n�,.4�y>;Lj�-,s � - ^ ,.,} - !`;,. .`•\asls,,. x. .-.nr5+¢4t -:a.,.<, >§A„ ;e saw J;a .�.'r, .. .. p. a,:_�.tt .... y `•�.._,.�res..�r� ,s'-s.' '::z.: ei?a. -' ��-�;aa w � r� .y,a € .rs i:r..:.x a:1 fi-l�+i�x• :$" ,no ,J•"_i;.. :a. ,�^ -a. ;t.., t rr.t a- e .. t.... �•.i...�,:;5•-$. 4 a,. t �+. t r43,: .. t e- . � .t ,.t.. � .•�•„ •t �, ��" r, 1a�� .FF ,"� xt'a� r,:td� ,.Fc.:�: :"�:s.7 I ".ai'm�k r �e.b; < �s• ,��,3. -r;:''. .3i. siS�`1�tu�,.- - tt,z�_i 'a x��a>;,k.-. t?4l -u, ti�,•�:,�s4�;z#, ;�2:i:�a+ a�� aa � �',u kT k�'� ( REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specit9e OC NO E:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Con itions on reverse hereof. ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require project e y a er' Dat Time Received b ecei t Tem e ❑MA DEP Form y: P P �K-t specific QC.Project specific QC Includes Sample Duplicates, i AA❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory QC is 1' a2 O ( z 6Z6hwJis Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC I ❑RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples, lin 1 ed y: t Time Rec by: hipping/Airbill �1MA MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional Number: /-Reportable Concentrations sample aliquot. S�OZ O 'ARCGW-IA FICS-1 Prolect specific Oc Required selection of OC Semple ell i Date Time ratory /U Custody Seal ❑RCGW-2❑RCS-2 ❑Sample Duplicate, ❑Selected by laboratory I!1151(� vt� 1 )� Cooler Serial ❑MA Dredge Disposal - Number: ❑NH❑RI❑CT O ME ❑Matrix Spike r ❑Please use sample: Method o t:❑GWA Courier❑Express Mail ❑ ederal xpress Specify Category: 0 Matrix Spike Duplicate 0 UPS 0 Hand 0 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Assurance/Quality Control �f� ��z o--�€" .t+d4 a �.,vn .�� ����-x• R.,� ��.�y�•xta�,.1`r 4�'�; a'h��.,��.-.�� .+,�a'4e.�.4�'fi�`t�,�i' � �� , '�4^zf�fi "'? i'�w�'nS pS L: Z +u .i N ���• �'-�c•-r :� ": 9 07. W ' •�-.��4 vi >, ' 3-s�.,,�„ • •`•;:ticw a.�. �.: .,,. �F..'�•�'2,=.'. �:?.s.'.;ii �:.. c,�'� a x59�'.�'i�k' <t�,a.`rz'1'.'S'�';`="X.»`�'�:rd�ro .ayc.'c? rz:,.„ .��.i1s.+F�,s,R< <£?t>, .n�. ..�3.` Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high quality, valid data. This, program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality.Assurance Project Plans, U.S EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and-one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration ..verification .standard and a blank;_ and excepting..GC/MS sequences,_.all sequences close with a continuing calibration standard. GC/MS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period,whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank., one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. L _ir�;�-c '... ,��/'u.... X^s`51t" .'¢, ".u,- r1 eS:sxs t S y-i'di3{s'4�_,4� 3r P �(, s+rafr.'�'• �., .y 4'z. _ iL r`y,1�>S+h.[_ .§ •. t�i .. 3"Z ti W -T 4i �F' .d ;,f',p� F`�3'Su��Vc�z Ac��... ,n° ° -s,' F2, .:�.5, s +"'` `... y+� . `fi��: .4« z:.r�,..�".�'•$.antn..: .i°'wrt.?'.+`..`:..#;.,_.,<.ez s,. ..zz 2a.FS.i.'tw�.«:2�w..` a.,: ..a.1.i..12.._,.x.K4•... Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Perent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control.Samples are.calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to, assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an-analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of. interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GR13UN13WATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch I D: EP-1131-F Matrix: Water Units: ug/L ACAS Number Analyfe 3w},JAM. _ ; , SpikPeil yx M asured `Recovery_ QC Limit- 111-84-2 n-Nonane(C9) 50 24 48% 40-140 % 629-594 n-Tetradecane(C14) 50 32 63% 40-140 % 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(Cl 9) 50 40 79% 40-140% 112-95-8 n-Eicosane(C20) 50 41 83% 40-140 % 630-02-4 n-Octacosane(C28) 50 39 77% 40-140 % 91-20-3 Naphthalene 50 35 70% 40-140 % 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 50 39 78% 40-140 % 120-12-7. Anthracene 50 46 91 % 40-140 % 129-00-0 Pyrene 50 46 92% 40- 140 218-01-9 Chrysene 50 46 92% 40-140 % QC$UrrO ate COm OUf1dS �'' xi Recover Tr r� 'rt C LImItSt_�3 .w ,R}x E Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 102 % 40-140 2-Bromonaphthalene 92 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 80 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl . 95 % 40- 140 % Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report'Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-1131-F Matrix: Water EPH Ranges -: Concentration Units Reporting Limit _ -C . n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 160 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 160 CAS Number Target Analytes t ' h Concentration Units Reporting Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 10 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 10 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 10 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 10 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 10 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 10 20644-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 10 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 10 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 10 i 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 10 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 10 ` Y Q0Surrogate Compounds' Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluor biphenyl 104 % 40- 140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 105 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 78 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 98 % 40-140% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Certifications and Approvals Groundwater Analytical maintains environmental laboratory certification in a variety of states. Copies of our current certificates may be obtained from our website: http://www.groundwateranal)dical.com/qualifications.htm r a4t s� � asc " s :. r is {Nil S ,� r� C®N N ICUT§Depar� ti�°tfe �h VH ,86 _ M _:t•. ` Categories: Potable Water,Wastewater,Solid Waste and Soil http://www.dph.state.ct.us/B RS/Envi ron mental_Lab/OutStateLab List.htm �,'� ��3'°:x#�'.. �n'��zy��: •"��E� k��,,�i,3-r+��jJ�"7��y 3'>-s �'t �" �,� � *� -� FLOR<tDA`De�1ar tment ofHealth Bureau�of Laboratories E87;643 -_.'�.b .-. a ...:,r. "Try`' .'. t+ees "4.MtitrFy�`C, 'i .`k$m"itik#'; �,s'� "�•+49 '. ,i...a.1' -�t ..f�;;d; �&?.,a. n�,.c�.'•+iRf✓, ,.s.,�,�rs Categories:SDWA,CWA, RCRA/CERCLA http://www.floridadep.org/labs/ga/dohforms.htm `� � ?*' `.i; Y P ti = MARINE Depa rnent of�Human ServicesA'M TQMA Categories: Drinking Water and Wastewater http://www.state.me.us/dhs/eng/water/Compliante.htm �M'�SS`ACH'USETTgS;De�ptm nt o Enonmental4P o ect on; M�MA1 Categories: Potable Water and Non-Potable Water http://www.state.ma.us/dep/bspt/wes/tfeiles/certlabs.pdf si i "t:�a+fk�.�7.�R`�-s'!i���.-�`� A.'�r.,�,7'd,-r`��`"�`•�ly�. �':�•'a�'� .�.N'31.•a�y. 's`y�,t,�'y �-#`49 F i.� WAMPSH'REDpa °fE�nv ° metal S�erues202703i�� ` Categories: Drinking Water and Wastewater http://www.des.state.nh.us/asp/NHELAP/Iabsview.asp ke � 3 NEW�YORK�Departmenyt of H a th; 11754 t �t �. s Categories:*Potable Water, Non-Potable Water and Solid Waste. http://www.wadsworth.org/labcertlelap/comm..html ENNSYLU`AN�JADe�ayrt�metorfEn ironme al PrSo�tection 68665 ,. �`� S`` ' Ake tY F _�'_'�'iiT{1YE}�si�iltL:2YT'�+' Xi'YS'Y•k`Z`6'•�i'��c blG ,'a.�C� vTtY j�.: �'- .�� �,S'sd. '�' Environmental Laboratory Registration(Non-drinking water and-Non-wastewater) http://www.dep.state.pa.us/Labs/Registered/ 4Y ak wl 15 i z r�vYa n X S S�3' 3" 3s r c i RH®DE ISLAND, -X�-�Department`ofHealfFr, 54 �.. ia•} .�,N ,y.Y�i,._ .' .;butl.7 ?K�-', ��u :rlfi�tik 'tk..'�k' .a k�ri3, Categories:Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable.Water,Sewage http://www.healthri.org/labs/IabsCT_MA.htm `` '" > ` 'tfi ' t+ cx$-r,� yl M1l�,""t` 5 '�_i"".rc " •rv„'±!�ta 43 t 'r' `k �U:SDepartment of�Agriculturew'Soi) PermrtS-5392 ci3 ,kb.6s..: . ."ic......,M�R�#'' _ f. ffia _, Foreign soil import permit el- Category: -L./.. Ciil .n'sNd:Ya�v114?dSEA3iY�'fi3lYit .v4_3 �sY_s.- `y '.� . �V,E•RM'O, Depa"'rtmnuir�sonmen'taatio1Nateruly�Drvision Drinking Water http://www.vermontdrinkingwater.orgtwsops/labtable.PDF Groundwater Analytical;Inc., P.O. Box)200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532: I 1 REC'D F E B 2 6 2004 GROUNDWATER Groundwater Analytical,Inc. P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL Buzzards Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 February 24 2004 FAX(508)759-4475 ry www.groundwateranalytical.com Mr.John Tadema-Wielandt Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 LABORATORY REPORT AMENDMENT Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./B002-3490 Lab ID: 55605 Received: 10-25-02 Dear John: -- Enclosed are the amended analytical results for the above referenced-project. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a sample receipt report detailing the samples received, a project narrative indicating project changes and non-contormances, a quality control report., and a statement of our state certifications. The analytical results contained in this report meet all applicable NELAC standards, except as may be specifically noted, or described in the project narrative. This report may only be used or reproduced in its entirety. attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Jonathan R. Sanford President J RS/smd Enclosures GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./B002-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 4.8'C Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Airbill: n/a Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 55605 Lab Receipt: 10-25-02 Custody Seal(s): n/a -:F^:.--•�h �.-,r .s E�K%'`'�'zt-. � T;�3"i4vs1 !S'S` Y ?��i� 'k-x '....Via; gnv.�._er`��-a-e€a d z. k 3 'Fr`i.� ... .:tis-yrf-� ysty�.s Lab ID s 3xaField ID �1 Matrix, Sam led fMethod�a z',Notest .•, r �?..E�f 55605-1 MW4 Aqueous 10/23/02 5:00 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep' Ship C153982 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5257 HCI. R-3173F 09-19-02 10-18-02 C153995 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5257 HCI R-3173F 09-19-02 10-18-02 C153994 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5257 HCI R-3173F 09-19-02 10-18-02 s ,..g "� .;„ "w,� u •ti+ T - -�+'y a 7t..+ i }s2�'.'.ya�• 4 Y f''�,�: 'y i Lab ID ; Freld ID fvlatnxr wSam ledMethod �m Notes k3 55605-2 GZA-2 Aqueous 10/23/02 5:30 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C153983 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5257 HCI R-3173F 09-19-02 10-18-02 C153971 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5257 HCI R-3173F 09-19-02 10-18-02 C153959 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5257 HCI R-3173F 09-19-02 10-18-02 1. ,+ nvcs tLab IDS 4 ,Fkeld+ID1„ t Matnx SSampled Method y � Notes 55605-3 GZA-3 Aqueous 10/23/02 5:45 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container. Vendor-. ..QC_Lot-. _ Presery .. QC Lot Prep Ship Ci53970 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5257 HCI R-3173F 09-19-02 10-18-02 C153958 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5257 HCI R-3173F 09-19-02 10-18-02 C153947 1 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5257 HCI R-3173F 09-19-02 10-18-02 'NM- sty ,� ae }aa�� ?=k t r, - v- a - .z , x - , lab IDI "Field ID s , atnx a�41Sampled� Melfiod . x. fi� Notest _`.r 556054 MW4 Aqueous 10/23/02 5:00 TPH by GC ASTM D3328-00 Mod Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C172642 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX5376 H2SO4 R-3421C 09-12-02 0947-02 C172647 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX5376 H2504 R-3421C 09-12-02 09-17-02 'lab ID s3 � taField IDS -' < 5am«.P.+=.'led�1P Method W 3_ az� .,... Mxatrtxcb_ .r- 3v.+. 55605-5 GZA-2 Aqueous 10/23/02 5:30 MA DEP EPH with PAHs Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C172643 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX5376 H2504 R-3421 C 09-12-02 09-17-02 C172639 1 L Amber Glass Proline BX5376 H2SO4 R-3421C 09-12-02 1 09-17-02 r i��J �a ') 1�lotes N.''�" rati rL.sa,lab fD' s eld D f€r xr a `Matnx x Sam led � Meffiod ` " ° ,,1 F t; Sa1s+..w�:: i,'-+9. ....3 ,: 55605-6- GZA-3 Aqueous 10/23/02 5:45 MA DEP EPH with PAHs Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C172638. 1 L Amber Class Proline BX5376 H2SO4 R-3421C 1 09-12-02 09-17-02 C172637 1 LAmberGlass Proline BX5376 H2504 R-3421C 09-12-02 09-17-02 �Y Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FI D Field ID: GZA-2 Laboratory ID: 55605-05 Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd/8002-3490 QC Batch ID: EP-1126-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 10-23-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 10-25-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 10-28-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 10-31-02 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH.Ranges Concentration Units_ Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C1 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 160 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons+ BRL ug/L 160 CAS Number Target Analytes Concentration Units Reporting Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 10 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 10 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 10 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 10 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 10 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 10 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 10 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 10 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 10 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 10 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 10 QC.Surrogate Compounds ,.' Recovery _ QC Limits -_ Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 67 % 40- 140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 60 % 40- 140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 66 % 40- 140% ortho-Terphenyl 78 % 40-140 % --- - -_ _- -�--- -a =-QA/QCCertification _._ s. - 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FI D Field ID: GZA-3 Laboratory ID: 55605-06 Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd/BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: EP-1126-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 10-23-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 10-25-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 10-28-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 10-31-02 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH Ranges Concentration Units; Reporting Limit ,. n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 160 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons r BRL ug/L 160 i—CAS Number ;. UTarget Analytes Concentration Units Reporting Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 10 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 10 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 10 86-73-7- Fluorene BRL ug/L 10 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 10 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 10 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 10 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 10 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 10 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 10 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 10 k LZ . QCSurrogate_Compounds Recovery - — _�_QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80 % 40-140% _ 2-Bromonaphthalene 76 % 40-140% --� Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 83 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 95 % 40- 140% QA/QC Certifrcation 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Project Narrative Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./B002-3490 Lab ID: 55605 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Received: 10-25-02 16:25 A�D�ao.c2umentat�o.n a�hent_Ciimmumcation.., � �' The following documentation discrepancies,and client changes or amendments were noted for this project: 1 . Samples 55605-05 and-06 were analyzed by MA DEP EPH with all targets,per John Tadema-Wielandt,02-23-04. N "�= s ''iY ' 'Y2asv � ZS asu� Mrfr� a: " 3vs .. ±�q�1 ; BINethodif�icationso n�Co.nforrnancesand�®bseruations i'.? . :�.r!+t�:t tr '.#Q�� W°r�:�y��'�'^rate:$'.•�;! ^z' ?w�'iha'^�'�'��. ,'3t�`�`fi "3ry_ �`� t`,� - -- ' The sample(s) in this project were analyzed by the references analytical method(s),and no method modifications, non-conformances or analytical issues were noted,except as indicated below: 1 . No method modifications, non-conformances or analytical issues were.noted. _ I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 228 Main Street,P.O.Box 1200 GROUNDWATER Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF—CUSTODY RECORD ANALYTICAL Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER N2 064756 FAX(508)759-4475 P jecIN a, Firm: TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST Q�����;5 �� valatllas semlvolatiles Pesl arh Cea Metals Petroleum aroaamon Her. General Chemistry Other ' ❑STANDARD(10 Business Days) a ata e o Ea H .I.TP waste Project Number: Address: z z n7 j(PRIORITY(5 Business Days) o t92 �,!90P.D ODX /l0l07 ❑ RUSH(RAN- ) F F up o I a (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ y 0 ❑ ;. Samples•Name:u / City/State/Zip: ` _•.,r; i TDr hL,iet�ntaT �/�8.7'Please FAX (g YES ❑NO s / gz cJSi ck Mai pZ�3/ o s a FAX Number: SGtS-89&J-. H � n - W Project Manager: Telephone: BILLING BILLING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a r�.oa.;: ..�iL`C1t'fP G✓!cf.An/�T S�V" (JQ�� �?1A3� a ❑ a - Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: a o a a s o ts INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates). 3�9 N a ❑ ❑ g r o Sampling Matrix a Containers m $ $ $ $ m a a d £ e Type O Preservation niterea i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ o a 0 8 9 ❑ g a p e e a o 6 LABO*ATORY S a _ o R ¢ m o r o ❑ ❑ S SAMPLE a g - a 43 ,.: $ s } - 3 ❑ a 9 ❑ ❑ IDENTIFICATION a - a a NUMBER $ - - - o o o w gL g W > 5 a a 5 5 s 5 5 a _ >3 (Lab U{;e Only) 11 1 X - g r �. o a 6 e m ❑ ? 0 0 o o 3 - g � � � s � S '� � ss � � R = o ;: , s° r �a � - ate • O S ❑ ❑ o 0 00 a ❑ 0 00 0 ❑ ❑ o ❑ o ❑ R 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ o ❑ o ❑ Z 3 Z I y Z / n ••77 3 .'a.�'F i N.h.} JJ F� :S:L.' t:-l-Z4--' �... .S it �'Y i t" -A-,, - 1 ��z s'yj C�7,4- 5 Z 3 2 3 Z 3 .l. _h :x °�'JF.: >' azt <, w F,-l° . .y •�. 4. t. ` c. :R,a t. :1 i } } ,r - I �'e< n cc 4 .ran..... .:.., w: aan •n4..rn.. . hL - s,.:.l•r;' :rt.•r"'+� .'fie-, _ , +~ r cEll 'f d a e,. ... Y.:,�... Ic-- :t.�:h �5, a r:'� 4. fir•F.t r. r , I a;e r5'"T. ,,� 'iJ yy•ir.S r}i r ciP:+<t -.,,..:,. a. I,s+;:�...ta,8..!. :s,nd s ass,,e.,. :,,.'Ir :S,�rn„•..:n.:e...�,i., } REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specific QC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. i Sa fe ❑ ae Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require project Relinquished b Sampler: Date Time Received by: Receipt Temperature: ❑MA DEP Form specific OC.Project specific QC includes Sample Duplicates, /� $.r0 A`•/e- it L 1 p j) / ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory QC is p 1�+•C U L/ � p�D� � Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Protect specific OC eE��/�' ' TGr ❑ A/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per'sample basis.For water samples, Relinq fished by: Date Time Received by: Shipping/Airbill MA MCP(310 CMR 4 each MS,MSD end Sample Duplicate requires an additional /�,11 �'`�_� j Number: 0) 1_ Rep�Aablo Concentrations sample aliquot. II /�/Q�G s G(� i 3D Cl wt' Q RCGW-1 ❑RCS-1 Project Specific OC Required SelectloM1 of OC Sample Relinquished by: Date Time eCeived b Labor at ry: Custody SeaV ❑RCGW-2❑RCS-2 / Cooler Serial ❑Sample Duplicate D Selectede laboratory C 0 _. -/ �� Number: ❑NH Dredge Disposal ❑Matrix Spike p Pleas I use sample: Metltud of Shl-uient GWA Courier❑Express Mail ❑Fede Express ❑ p ❑RI❑CT❑ME O Matrix Spike Duplicate t V p Specify Category: , ❑UPS ❑Hand❑ GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL . Quality Assurance/Quality Control EW-7 � A� o ram;OverviewTm �� -_d .`>m�`�.....�... ''u L4:Y' � -w' .�. �r'��ia'�"� ,�k .�1'.81�. Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality. Assurance program to ensure the production of high. quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) developed for each analytical method.. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and.a blank; and excepting .GC/MS.sequences, all sequences close with_a continuing. calibration standard. GC/MS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period,whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control:` sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparatiorr. batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity.is- verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. x_� _ ..'+. $m Kaki_..�.,s�ik�.ns._E.._ � '�a�'� .�r� :� ����s F S� z x[._ .a�•.,aE,rv;a�SaKY4".a�F3 <M��l�•.", Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Perent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to. assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks.are taken through all the appropriate . steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL .Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-1126-F Matrix: Water Units: ug/L �#CAS�NumberxsfAnalyte � � Spiked' Measured � RecoveQC�Limits,� 111-84-2 n-Nonane(C9) - 50 21 43 % 40-140% 629-59-4 n-Tetradecane(C14) 50 30 59% 40-140% 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(C19) 50 41 81 % 40-140 % 112-95-8 n-Eicosane(C20) 50 41 82% 40-140 % 630-024 n-Octacosane(C28) 50 36 73% 40-140 % 91-20-3 Naphthalene 50 32 64% 40-140 % 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 50 35 71 % 40-.140 % 120-12-7 Anthracene 50 43 87% 40-140% 129-00-0 Pyrene 50 43 85 % 40-.140 % 218-01-9 Chrysene }} 50 43 86% 40-140% '2 " ; '; Recover A C Limlts _ ( �"-��'�QC Surrogate�Cgmpounds�;"�.��.�....,��s�,r .. _ ,Y-�����. ,� L Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 74"%" "40- 140 2-Bromonaphthalene 71 % 40- 140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 76 % 40-140 % ortho-Terphenyl 88 % 40-140 % Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. ti , Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 I GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL - Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-1126-F Matrix: Water EPH Ranges r, Concentration - Units. Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 160 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 160 CAS Number Target Analytes; Concentration T units Reporting Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 10 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 10 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 10 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 10 86-73-7 Fluorene • BRL ug/L 10 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 10 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 10 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anth race ne BRL ug/L 10 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 10 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 I 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 10 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 10 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 10 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 10 QC Surrogate Compounds '' w _ Recovery _ QC Lrmits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 82 % 40-140 % 2-13romonaphthalene 62 % 40-140 % Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 75 % 40-140 % ortho-Terphenyl 95 % 40-140 Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Certifications and Approvals Groundwater Analytical maintains environmental laboratory certification in a variety of states. Copies of our current certificates may be obtained from our website: http://www.groundwateranaI)dicaI.com/qualifications.htm - � Categories: Potable Water,Wastewater,Solid Waste and Soil http://www.dph.state.ct.us/BRS/Environmental Lab/OutStateLabList.htm - r-�' ��'�.�a �"bt� .�i�'��v`����a��a�b'��'r�x Y`�» ���`',ae�`n, �t'�j`��r"�fs�T .�a�".d•�;� � •��r '�''�`,;�$' ' FL®RIDAepartrnent of Healfh` Bureaus�of�Laborator.ies E8'7{6443 r�� `� `��� f� Categories:SDWA,CWA, RCRA/CERCLA http://www..ffIo�r(idadep.org/l abs/ga/dohforms.htm MRA.�I1NIE',y,�®'department ofrHuman Services,• MJA103 i � � S � Fx" Categories: Drinking Water and Wastewater http://www.state.me.us/dhs/eng/wyatter/Compliance.htm y . .. ._. }S"��r�.�s��i?�,z�-s�3`a�ce^��i� ,�-"+`.Ss�?a, °-�a�E��,�x�`'�''?' �-t�a✓��n.�Xb �j4i t�`�` �'� ��.� _x '.ti�^$ ""�'''.?�.,$�. .,a ...'._ ��M�� C�,�U "as�',��`�e�,,P ��t°� '��°�m.�ntal��P��ro�tec ° a�M�°-�M.A �03 '�'�` �' �� •,n_ ���x� " h Categories: Potable Water and Non-Potable Water http://www.state.ma.us/dep/bspt/wes/fiIes/certlabs.pdf � ��N HAMPSHIRE,CDepartmentf Enuiro inen al�Sery es�20 03� � � F r j' 3 x �,� Categories: Drinking Water and Wastewater http://www.des.state.nh.us/asp/NHELAP/Iabsview.asp �`",a"-Lr'',��'��y �1�'at,�'R7,3�'zt�,. `�"',/j ��ab � c ak•;m � r ,ys *z sr � �, k �y����� c�v .x�,.��'at,r{'�r��r''�,�? ss`;'`�^u?�`�iS..'��.vr-�?�� ',r»_r�ar�'t'"4'.3.� .�*��:� .<..,i u+ .:.�' � 'F�GR`",�x�-a:-na� � �r '�• ��: Categories: Potable Water, Non-Potable Water and Solid Waste http://www.wadsworth.org/labcert/elap/comm.ktml �S3'�''rt�'T�S'""P,�y3.'�`5x{»��s' �.'"�r3�,�r��'"��'.'i3 Ati` :� ¢ •�'"`�C""�, �3t"�:§7$�i�n }�zx;�l*�• b*..h'r��r}� t: � a� �aq�'u�. r, - .r��`� �; Environmental Laboratory Registration(Non-drinking water and Non-wastewater) http://www.dep.state.pa.us/Lab,s/R6gistered/ 3g1'XE `s+', '`t�t)' ".r c '. �'s 5��. !„ r �' vs�•x' e� U '4(+�F�` -A Categories: artment�ofalHealth 54 ' � ��� � � r } Categories:Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage http://www.healthri.org/labs/labsCT—.MA.htm n 1�15� p rtmen�to Ag ultue,.S it emit;��$t5 92r1 �tgf $ •;s �' ,4 s,, '��t��, �• ,,� �aJ�y k bSs ?6• 5 r ax x Y�C rL� �" �w im o. a �c'Yar F Foreign soil import permit - �VE O,NT;�Dsep�a tmenf o Eno m"nental�G'n e ation �W�ater Su I Division ���" ������ W Category: Drinking Water http://www.vermontdrinkingw.ater.org/wsops/labtable.PDF Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O: Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 The Town of Barnstable + BABcvsTABLE, » Office of Town Manager MASS. 039.�p 367 Main Street, Hyannis MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4610 John C.Klimm,Town Manager Fax: 508-790-6226 Email:John:klimm(@,,town.barnstable.ma.us RECEIVED MAR 0 8 2004 MEMORANDUM TOWHEALTH DEPT. TO: Tom McKean, Director Health Dept. FR: John C. Klimm, Town Manager DT: March 5, 2064 RE: Notice of Public Hearing and Procedural Conference—Keyspan Energy Please be informed of a public notice on the above said matter. Thank you. JCK: smo Attachment C5 February 27, 2004 Attached please find Notice of Public Hearing and Procedural Conference in DX.E. 04-9. Would you please post Notice in your Town/City Hall until close of business (5:00 p.m.) Friday, March 19, 2004. Attachment I . = 0 �o =g b--G :7 S ©D 'r C'7 r•1 rn LADTE Proceeding\03-86'03-'04 Energy EfficiencyIncentiveRecovery\Memo to Cities and Towns 022704.doc fj• , February 26, 2004 D.T.E. 04-9 f... Petition of..Boston Gas Company, Colonial Gas Company, and Essex'Gas.Company each d/b/a Keyspan Energy Delivery New England, .pursuant to Boston Gas Company, D.T.E. 0340 (2003) and NOI/Gas Unbundling-, D.T.E. 98-32-B (1999) for review of a'gas resource portfolio management and gas sales agreement. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PROCEDURAL CONFERENCE On February.3, 2004, Boston Gas Company, Colonial Gas Gpmpany, and Essex Gas Company each d/b/a Keyspan EnergyDelivery New England (collet_#vely, "Keyspan" or "Company"), in compliance with Boston"Gas Company, D.T.E. 03-40(2003) and NOI/Gas Unbundling, D.T.E. 98-32-B (1999), filed with "the Departiriefit of TelecorYimuniU6ons and- Energy ("Department") a gas idsource portfolio management'and gas,sales agre'e'hi ht ' ("Portfolio Agreement") between-the Company and Entergy-Koch Trading, LP (Entefgy- Koch") for the Department's review. in D.T.E.-03-40, at 227, the Department found'that the Company had failed to file with the Department for review Ke'yspan-;e` t'bree-year Portfolio Agreement with Entergy-Koch. 1d. citing D.T.E. 9.8-32-B at 57. Therefore, the-Department will review Keyspan's Portfolio Agreement to determine, among other�'fhings, whether the Company has complied with the directive-contained in D.T.E. 9.8-32-B and D.T.E. 03-40. The Department docketed the filing as D.T.E. 04=9. The Department will conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the Company's filing at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, Mareh,T4, 20.041 at the Department's offices- One South Station, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110. The Department will hold a procedural chi ferenee immediately after the conclusion of the public hearing. Any person who wishes to submit written comments may do so by filing an,original and five (5) copies of such comments with: 1v1ary L. Cottrell, SecretaTy, Department of Telecommunications and Energy, One South Station, Boston, Massachusetts 0.2110, no later than the close of business Mai-eh 231 2.004:. Any person seeking to iritefvene in this irive"stigation must file a i.original and three (3) copies of a written petition for leave to intervene or to participate in:tfis proceeding no-later than the close of business (5:00 p.m.).Friday, Mareh 19."20.04, with Mary L. Cottrell, Secretary, Department of Telecommunications and Energy, One South'Station, Boston, \I' D.T.E. 04-9 Page 2- Massachusetts 02110. All comments and petitions to intervene must.also be submitted to the Company's attorney, Thomas P. O"Neill, Esq, 52 Second Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451. A petition to intervene must satisfy the timing and substantive requirements of 220. C.M.R. § 1.03. Receipt by the Departmeli"t -- not mailing -- constitutes f ling and determines whether a petition is timely filed. A late-filed petition may be disallowed.as untimely, unless. good cause is shown for waiver. To be allowed; a petition under 220�C.M.R. 1.03(1) must satisfy the standing requirements of G.L. c. 30A, § 10. All written pleadings or comments must also be submitted to the:Departnierit in.electroic format using one of the following'metliods: (1) by e-mail attacluiient to dte.efilingcr,state.ma.us. Arid john.geM@state.ma.us or(2) on a 3.5" floppy diskette,IBM-compatible format. The text of the e-mail or the diskette label must specify: (1) an easily identifiable ca e_caption; (2) docket number; (3) name of the person or company submitting the f ling; and(4)a brief descriptive title or document(e.g., comments or petition to intervene). The electronic filing should also include the name,'title and phone number'of a person to contact in the event of questions about the filing. Text responses should be written in either Core! Word Perfect(naming the document with a ".wpd" suffix) or in 1Vlicrosoft Word, (naming the,document with a".doc'.' suffix). Data or spreadsheet responses should be compatible with Miciosoft'Excel. Documents submitted in electronic format will be posted on the Department's Web site, http://www.mass.gov/dpu. A copy of the Company's filing is on file at the Department's offices, One South Station, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, for public view during business hours. The Company's filing is also posted on the Departmerit's Website. Copies of the filing are also on file for public view at Keyspan, 52'Second Street, Waltham, Massachusetts. Any .person desiring further information regarding the Company's filing should contact Thomas P. O'Neill, Esq., at 781 466=5136. Any peirson desiiin further information reg aid n this notice should contact John J. Geary, Hearing Officer, Department of Telecommunications andEnergy, at (617) 305-3616. i i ENNET T 'At 0 RE I L Ly, Inc. i, Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line PO Box 1667 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Brewster, MA 02631 Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Licensed Site Professional Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax B002-3490 February 26, 2004 FwECEIVED Mr. Bert Fournier c/o Ms. Evelyn Read MAR 0.1 2004 HUBBARD OIL COMPANY, INC P.O. BOX 10 TOWN HALTH DEpT. Hyannis MA, 02601 RE: DISCOVERY OF PAHs IN GROUNDWATER Hubbard Oil Company Inc. - RTN 4-0824 33 and 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 14, Parcel 125 and126] - Hyannis, MA. 02601 Dear Ms. Read, On February 5, 2004, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. was at the above site to perform scheduled quarterly groundwater sampling of selected monitoring wells, both at the site and on the downgradient Robies Refrigeration property, as based on the revised Environmental Monitoring Program in the Hubbard Remedial Operation Status Report I, dated 12/30/03. Results of these analyses, received February 24, 2004, indicate the presence of several Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons(PAHs),marginally above the applicable RCGW-1 Reportable Concentration as well as the Method 1 GW-1 Risk Characterization Standards in the downgradient monitoring wells GZA- 1, GZA-2, MW-5D and MW-6S located on the Robies property. BENNETT& O'REILLY,INC. has conducted a review of previous analytical results from these downgradient wells and it appears that none of these compounds have been previously detected at the downgradient Robies property. Similarly,none of these compounds have been detected within monitoring wells at the Hubbard property as within'the area of the subject release. We have requested Groundwater Analytical to report the full list of PAH concentrations on all previous EPH testing of soils at the Hubbard property. Such results are pending at the time of this correspondence. As such, based on the spatial and temporal distribution of these heavy-weight PAH compounds as being not identified in the monitoring wells at the Hubbard property, BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC. concludes that there must be another source of the detected contaminants. The suspected source of these high molecular weight PAHs is creosoted timbers in the railroad easement leaching through the subsurface and into the groundwater, as being consistent with the identified contaminants and upgradient of the impacted wells at the Robies property. 1 FEBRUARY 26,2004 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC/BROOKS RD./BO02-3490 PAGE 2 OF 2 DISCOVERY OF PAHS IN GROUNDWATER While the concentrations detected are above the RCGW-1 Concentrations, under the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0317(9),(12)and(16 a)it seems as though the identified"release"does not require Release Notification because(1)the release is suspected to be related to coal tar from the creosoted timbers and(2)because the release is emanating from building materials that are in good repair and still serving their original intended use and (3) response actions are already being undertaken at the Hubbard site in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0000 as Adequately Regulated. However, because of the relative sensitivity of the area where the samples were collected, being directly upgradient of the Maher Wellfield public water supply, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. is copying the Department on this correspondence so that they can specify any additional actions they may deem appropriate. BENNETT &. O'REILLY, INC. would recommend that the . Barnstable Water Company test their wells for semi-volatile compounds in order to determine if there is a risk of ingestion of these compounds to the general public served by the Public Water Supply Wells. BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC. will continue to monitor these downgradient wells quarterly as specified and will review the information relative to the identified PAHs upon receipt. Should you have any questions,or need additional information,please contact either of the undersigned directly at your earliest convenience. Si erely, B1 NN ILLY, INC. vi ett, SP c or J hn D.:Tiad ma-W t' Dire of onmental Services roject M ager encl. Groundwater Analytical Results"Groundwater Analytical Iric."dated 2/23/04 and 10/27/03 Site Plan RIP-2 prepared by Bennett& O'Reilly, Inc. dated 4/24/03 (revised 12/19/03) cc. Laura Stanley, Sites Management -MA DEP (SERO) Attorney Robert Fasanella-RUBIN &.RUDMAN, LLP John Robichaud, President- Robies Refrigeration David Condry - Barnstable Water Company Lieutenant Hubler-Hyannis Fire Department Thomas McKean- Barnstable Board of Health John Klimm - Barnstable Town Manager, c/o Barbara Harris, Town Counsel Commonwealth of Massachusetts,c/o Executive office of Transportation and Construction- (Railroad easement owners) Groundwater Analytical,Inc. GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Bards Bay. 228.Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 February 23, 2004 FAX(508)759-4475 www.gmundmteranalyfical.wm Mr. David Bennett Bennett& O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 LABORATORY REPORT Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./B002-3490 Lab ID: 69408 Received: 02-06-04 Dear Dave: Enclosed are the analytical results for the above referenced project. The project was processed for Standard turnaround. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a sample receipt report detailing the samples received, a project narrative indicating project changes and non-contormances, a quality control report, and a statement of our state certifications. .::.:.—uc.:umuvrraaawr vua:criau:a'� umwnua.wam�c:ma:u:r�.:.:u�a-.�-vr.aa:rr.ra.-zzvooAaacn:3.�..:tcdoc:rwc u.:ra::m:rraw:xn_went.::c.cxs:.-.n.—e':r..u:v:w6:=.rar.r raiur..r:.n_..•::..:•r,n'— The analytical results contained in this report meet all applicable NELAC standards, except as may be specifically noted, or described in the project narrative. This report may only be used or reproduced in its entirety. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately .responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ho Jonathan R. Sanford President JRS/smd Enclosures SROUADMTER ANALYTICAL Data Certification Project Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./6002-3490 Lab ID: 69408 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc Received: 02-06-04 1250 WIE Project Location: n/a MA DEP RTN:-� -n/a This Form provides certifications for the following data set: MA DEP VPH: 6940"1,-02,-03,-04,-05,-06,-07,-08,-09,-10;11 MA DEP EPH: 69408-12;13,-14,-15;16,-17;18;19,-20,-21,-22 Sample Matrices: Groundwater (X) Soil/Sediment ( ) Drinking waw ( ) Other ( ) _ 4 _ 8260B ( ) 8151A ( ) 8330 ( ) 60108 ( ) 7470A/1A ( ) 8270C ( ) 8081A ( ) VPH (X) 6020 ( ) 9012AZ ( ) -� o�a 8082 ( ) 80218 ( ) EPH (X) 7000 53 (. ) Other ( ) --- - -- = tea- An affirmative response to questions A,B,C and D is required for"Presumptive Certainty"status. A- I Were all samples received by the laboratory in a condition consistent with that described on the Chain-of-Custody documentation for the data set? Yes B. Were all QA/QC procedures required for the specified-analytical method(s) included in this report followed,including the requirement to note and discuss in a narrative QC data that did not meet appropriate performance standards nr guidelines? Yes C. Does the analytical data included in this report meet all the requirements for"Presumptive Certainty,'as described in Section 2.0 of the MA DEP document CAM VII A,Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Atialytical Data? Yes D. VPH and EPH methods only: Was the VPH or EPH method run without significant modifications,as specified in Section 11.3? Yes A response to questions E and F below is required for"Presumptive Certainty"status. — E. Were all QC performance standards and recommendations for the specified methods achieved? No F. Were results for all analyte-list compounds/elements for the specified method(s)reported? Yes All No answers are addressed in the attached Project Narrative. I,the undersigned,attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that,based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for obtaining the information,the material contained in this analytical report is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,accurate and complete. Signature: Position: President Printed Name:. Jonatha .S ord Date: 02-23.04 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Btizzards Bay, MA 02532 GRCXMWWATER ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report (Continued Project Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 2'C Client Sennett&0'Reifty,Inc. Airbill: n/a Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 69408 Lab Receipt 02-06-04 Custody Seal(s): n/a tilt, 69408-16 MW-6S Aqueous 2/5/04 13:00 MA DEP EPH with PAI-Is by 8270C-Mod SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presem -QC Lot Prep Ship C348679 I LAmberGlass Proline 8X10194 H2SO4 R-3779B 12-2"3 n/a C348678 1 LAmberGlass Proline 8X10194 H2SO4 R-37796 12-29-03 m/2 69408-17 MW-6D Aqueous 2/5/04 12:50 MA DEP EPH with PAI-Is by 8270C-Mod SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C348671 I L Amber Glass Proline BX10194 HZS04 R-37798 12-29-03 rWa C348670 I LAmberGlass Proline BX10194 H2504 _R3779B 12-29-03 n/a W h4etfi'd—I;Aiw*U� —FiAd: 696408-18 MW-1 Aqueous 2/5104 14:45 MA DEP EPH with FAI-Is by 827OC-PAW SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presev QC Lot Prep Ship C3486731 I L Amber Glass Proline BX10194 HZS04 R-3779B 12-29-03 rVa C3486681 I L Amber Glass Praline BX10194 H2.504 R-35:79-�B 12-29-03 n/a 69408-19 MW-2 Aqueous 2/5/t14 14:45 MA DEP EPH with PAI-Is by 8270C-Mod SIM I Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Prmw-, QC Lot Prep I Ship C348672 I LAmberGlass Praline BX10194 H2SO4 R-37793 12-29-03 n/a C348669 1 LAmbercilass, Praline BX10194 H2SO4 R-3779B 12-29-03 n/a Moto ... ............... . ........ 69408-20 MW-4 Aqueous 2/5/04 15:20 MA DEP EPH with PAI-Is by 8270C-Mod SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Prexry QC Lot Prep Ship C326833 1 LAmberGlass Praline* 8XI0898 H2SO4 R-3779B 01-21-04 n/a C326832 I LAmberGlass Proline BX 10898 142:504 R-3779B 01-21-04 n/a es ............ 69408-21 SEA-1 Aqueous 2/5/04 15:50 MA DEP EPH with PAI-Is by 8270C-Mod SIM Con ID Contai ner Vendor QC lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C326837 I L Amber Glass Proline SX10898 H2504 R-37798 01-21,04 I n/a C3268301 I L Amber Glass Proline 13XI0898T H2SO4 R-3779B 01-21-04 n/a rw "e, 69408-22 SEA-2 Aqueous 215/04 15:30 MA DEP EPH with PAHs by 8270C-hAod SIM on ID Container Vendor QC lot Prosery QC Lot Ship 0 &L C�326836 1 I.AmFAwGlaq, Prolinp BXI0898 H2504 P-37798 Di-21-04 n/a C 2 C3�26831 I L Amber C lass Pmline BX10898 H2504 R-37798 01-21-04 n/a Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GR 3ENVOWATER ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report (Continued) Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 2'C Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Airbill: nia Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 69408 Lab Receipt: 02-06-434 Custody Seal(s): nfa d, -U641D FMd lW 7 Method Nate&' 6940" MW-2 Aqueous 2/5104 14:45 MA DER VPH with Targets Can 10 Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot i Prep I Ship T " --C3500646 40L VOA Vial Industrial BX9938 HCl T-3-85—M-7-12-111-413 n/a C351777 40 ml.VOA Vial i Industrial OX9274 HCI R-3722E i 09-19-03 nia C351730 40 ml.VOA Vial i Industrial BX9274 HCI R-3722E 09-19-03 n/a _p�.AtUrt Sin d-- 69408-9 MW-4 Aqueous 2/5)04 15:20 MA DER VPH with Targets Can ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot i Prep ship C3500801 40 ml.VOA Vial r Industrial OX9938 —k--i i5 7 D 12-11-03 n/a O500791 40 ml.VOA Vial Industrial SX9938 I HC1 R-3857D 12-11-03 n/a C3k0Z-7'T 4d'mL''VOA'Vial Industrial BX9938 HCI R-3857D 1 12-11-03 n/a 7 7 7 mp 69,408-10 SEA- iA DER VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot i Prewry QC Lot i Prep ship C338203 40 MIL VOA Vial industrial OX9966 HC1 P-3722D1-03-03 11-23-03 C338t 78 40 mL )A Vial i Industrial BX9966 HCI R-3722D 1-03-03 11-25-03 i )A Vial Industrial OX9966 HCl R-3722D 11-03 3 11-25-03 1 69408-11 SEA-2 Aqueous 215104 15:30 MA DER VPH with Targets Con ID I Container Vendor QC Lai Prewry QC Lot i Prep Ship C339165: 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial RX9966 HCl R-3722D r 11-D3-0.3 I 11-2-5-03 C350068! 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial Rx993.9 HCI R-38.57D 12-11-03 Na I C35017156: 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial SX9938 HCI R-3857D r 12-11-03 i n/a i Lab 111) Field lD I Matrix SoiiWiW: Method 69408-12! GZA-1 Aqueous 2/5104 13:30 MA DER EPH with PAI-Is by 8270C-Mod SIM Con 10 Container Vendor QC Lai I Presery QC 1.011 Prep Ship C3411677i 1 L Amber Class— Proline BX10194 R-37798 12-29-03 n/a C3486761 1 L Amber Glass Prolin�BXI0191 1_._H2504 R-37798 I 12-29-03 n/a Lab ID Fie1&.10" i Matrix Sampled'; -Method 69406-13 GZA-2 Aqueous 215/04 13:30 M,&DER EPH with PAHs by 827OC-Mod SIM T— Con ID Container Vmdur .--..QC Lut Prebery QC Lot Prep �Shi C348675 1 L Amber Glass Proline SX10194 H2504 R-37798 12-29-03 n/a 1`-648674 1 LAnbr Glass Proline 8X10194 H2504 J R-37798 12-29-03 i n/a Lab:ID Field1l): M;diix 53!no �'Aithod-.'- !Nwei;. 1 69408-14 MW-55 Aqueous 2/5/04 12:00 MA,DER EPH with PAI-Is by 8270C-Mod SIM J Con ID Container LVendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C326870 j I L Amber Glass Proline i SX10901 1-12SO4 K-37798 01-21-U4 i n/a mber(;Iass Proline I BX10901 1-1:604 R-37798 01-21-04 n1a I La;--jD7 find IM = Matrix Si :'�-hWmd 69408-15 MW-5D Aqueous W5104 12:10 MA DFP FPH with RAW by 8270r-MM SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep : Ship 1C326869 1 L Amber Glass ProlineOX10901 H2SO4 R-37 98 01-21-04 n/a C326862 I L Am ber G Lass Proline _.BX1090l.__H2504 R-37798 01-21-04 n/a Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 ERCIUVOWATER ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd-/B002-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 2'C Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Airbill: rtla Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 69408 Lab Receipr. 02-06-04 Custody Seal(s): n/a �c$-: =•3anpie�':` _-tah LD =- ...�. 69408-1 GZA-1 Aqueous 2/5/04 13:30 MA DEP VPH with Targets Can ID Container Vendor QC Lot Prescry QC lot Prep Ship C350053 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9938 HCI R-3857D 12-11-03 n/a I C351718 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9274 HCI R-3722E 09 19-03 n/a i C351765 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9274 HCl R-3722E 09.19-03 n/a 69408-2 GZA-2 Aqueous 2/5/04 13:30 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C350077 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9938 HCI R-38570 12-11-03 r✓a C3500781 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9938 HCI R-3857D 12-11-03 rt/a C350065 40 ml VOA Vial Industrial I BX9938 HCl R-3857D 12-11-03 n/a . .E ' 69408-3 MW-5S Aqueous 2/5104 12.00 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Prewry I QC Lot Prep Ship C350120 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9938 HCI I R-38570 12-11-03 n/a C350122 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial SX9938 HCI R-38570 t2-11-03 n/a C350121 1 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9938 HCl R-38570 12-7 1-03 n/a -- - ;- -briabsr :�5-orgAtld_: :A4t�e�. . 69408-4 MW-5D Aqueous 2/5/04 12:10 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C350109: 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9938 HCI R-38570 12-11-03 Na C3501081 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9938 HCI R-3857D 12-11-03 n/a LC3500971 40 mL VOA Vial ' Industrial F SX9938 HCI R-3857D 12-11-03 n/a I -lab ID Notes. 69408.5 MW-65 j Aqueous 2/5/04 13:DO MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor I QC Lot Presery I QC Lot I Prep Ship -138167 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial RX9966 HCI R-3722D 11-03-03 11-25-03 C3381.5.5 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9966 HCI I R-37221) 1 1-03-03 11-25-03 C351742 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9274 HCI R-3722E 09-19-03 n/a Lab ID.: :, Sell ID 7�eFatrtz - .._ . = Sam01Qd —��- 69408-6 MW-61) Aqueous 2/5/04 1250 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con 1D Container Vendor QC lot Presery QC lot Prep Ship i C338154 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9966 HCI R-3722D 11-03-03 11-25-03 C338191 4D m'VOA Vial Industrial BX9966 HCI R-3722D 11-03-03 11.25-03 I 1 C338179 40 ml VOA Vial Industrial BX9966 HCI R-3722D 11-03-03 11-25-03 - 69408-7 MW-1 Aqueous 2/5/04 14:45 MA DE?VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C338213 40 rnL VOA Vial `. Industrial BX9966 HO R-37220 11-03-03 11-25-03 C338202 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9966 HCI R-37220 11-03-03 11-25-03 C351775 40 ml VOA Vial Industrial BX9274 HCI R-3722E ! 09]9-03 n/a Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GR XJNDIWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCIPID/FID field ID: GZA-1 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard OW Brooks Rd1B002-3490 Container. 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCI/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-01 QC Batch ID: VG10-2042-W Sampled: 02-05-04 13:30 Instrument ID: GC-10 HP 6990 Received: 02-06-M 1250 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 02-17-04 1158 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst PO n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons'0 - -- — — BRL ug/L� 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 20 ccc n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 37 ug/L 1 20 ?rQ Unadjusted n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL _ ug/L 20 unadiumtd n-C9 to n-C12 AliphaticHydrocarbons' 46 ug/L 20 SAS._ -•- = Ar+7Y "= ._:.�:...._ ,._._ 3Vgtes.. W_Uirs 1634-04-4 methyl tent-b I Ether' BRL ug/L 5 71-43-2 Benzene° BRL ug/L 1 108-88-3 Toluene' �. BRL ug/L 5 100-41-4 Fth Iben7ene t BRL ug/L 5 10&38.3 and 10642-3 meta-X lene and para-X lene; BRL ug/L 5 9S-47-6 ortho- X lene s BRL ug/L 5 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 2,S-Dibromotoiuene(PID) 100 1 110 114 % 70-130% 2,5-Dibromotoluene(fID) 100 110 114 % 70- 130% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. were any significant modifications made to the method,as specitled in Section 11.3.2.1? No iMethod non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control repon. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanrying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon's,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range dam excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n{S to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze Luncentrdtiuns. ® n-C9 to ri-CU Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n,-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. tt Analyte elutes in the nCS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. 3 Analyte elutes in tine n-C9 to irC12 Aliphatic Hydmcarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GRDt/NDMTL=R ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJPID/FID Field ID: GZA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd-/BO02-3490 Container, 40 mL VOA Vial Cl ient: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation. HCi/cool Laboratory ID: 69408-02 . QC Batch ID: VG70-2042-W Sampled: 02-05-04 13:30 Instrument ID: GC-10 HP 6890 Received: 02-06.04 1250 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 02-17-04-13:15 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: PO T_ -- -= n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons'° BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons '® BRL ug/L 20 ��CG n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' 20 ug/L 20 ; n{5 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 20' I Un d•usted n-C9 to n-012 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons} i BRL ug/L 20 t 1634-04 4 I Methyl tent butyl Ether'-..............__.�...- ---- --- BRL ...._...-...— — --._ ug(L _._...5 . 71 43-2 Benzene ' BRL ug/L 1..... - , 108-88-3 Toluene : DRL ug/L 5 100-41-4 Eth (benzene` BRL ! ug/L 5 _ IM-18-3 and 10642.3 meta-X lene and para-X lene° BRL ug/L 5 95-47-6 ortho- X lene` BRL j ug/L 5 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L i 5 2,5 Dibromotoluene(P1D) 100 110 109 % 70-130 qo i 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) i 100 110 1 109 % 70-130% A/all were 1. - I Q QC procedures required by the method followed? yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant mudificatiuns made to die nlethud,as specified in Secdun 1 1.3.2.1>. No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter- The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze concentrations. 0 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatir.Hydrnrarbrim range data excludes the mathnd target analyte.concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range- a Analyte elutes in the nr-5 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. t Analyze elutes in the n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 ............... GROC/IVDWATF.R ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCIPID/FID Field ID: MW SS Project Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Matnjc Aqueous Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc Container 40 ml VOA Vial Laboratory ID: 69408-03 Preservation: MCI/Cool Sampled: 02-05-04-12:00 QC Batch ID_ VG70-2042-W . Received: 0246-04 12S0 Instrument ID: CC-10 HP 6890 Analyzed: 02-17-04 14.36 Sample Vofume: 5 mL Analyst: PO Dilution Factor. 1 n-a to n-C8 Ali hatic rocarborts t° — — BRLnC9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic H i9/L 2 rocarbonsBRL ton-C10 Aromatic H drocarbons 41 ug/L 200 t, v" _ ug(L 20 Unadjusted n—05 to n-C8 Ali hatic H drocarbons' BRL Unadiusirrl n{9 to n{12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbon 35 s' ug/L 20 igiin5ef _ J u �0 16344044 Methyl tert b I Ether" 71-43-2 Benzene' BRL ug(L" 5 108-88-3 Toluene BRL ug(L 1 5 1013-41-4 Eth (benzene; BRL ug/LBRL '°rL3e3a"d'°6'z_3 meta-X lenea_nd Para-X lene`—9— uBfL 5 BRL � 5 5-47-0 o-— orth Xvlrne j u L 91' ZD 3 Naphthalene BRL uP�l 5 BRL ug/L I 5 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) RI 100 110 112 %2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 120 119 % 70-130% 70-130% 1 Were all QA/QC procedures required by die method followed? 2_ Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required A/QC procedures - - - - Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified achieved? Yes r Itedfied in Section 1 1.3.2.1? No I Method non-confurmances indicated above am detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and pmject quality control report. Release of this data is authorfzed by the accompanying signed project cover fetter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Vnlatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below rp.mrting lim it for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditinns. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range- 0 n-05 to OC8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze crmcentrations. ® n{9 to rv- 72 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-{9 to n-Cl Q.&Umatfc Hydrocarbons range. a Analyse elutes in the n-05 to 4-C8 A)iphatir Hydrocarbons range. 2 Analyte elutes in the n{9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range.. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O_ Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 ........... SIMUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJPID/FID Field ID- MW-6s Matrix Aqueous Project. Hubbard Oil/Brooks ftUB002-3490 Container. 40 ml.VOA Via] Client Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H(3/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-05 - QC Batch ID: VC10-2042-W Sampled: 02-05-04 13.00 Instrument ID: GC-10 HP 6890 Received: 02-06-04 12:50 Sample Volume- 5 mL Analyzed: 02-17-04 15:57 Dilution Factor. I Analyst- P01 .......... CARkO n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1 0 BRL ug(L 20 n-C9 to n-Cl 2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons* BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 20 Vxwdiuged n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L :20 J.Unadjusted n-C to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 20 1634444 AAethyl tert-butyl Ether BRL ug/L. 5 71-43-2 1 BRL ug/L 1 108-88-3 I Toluene BRL ug/L S 100-41-4 I Ethvlbenzene BRL ug/L 5 meta-Xylene and para-Xylene BRL ug/L 5 95-47-6 ortho- Xylene BRL 5 L91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L S 2.5-Dibmmotoluene(PID) 100 93 93 % 70-130 % 2,5-Dibmmnfnlupnp(FID) 100 102 102 % 70- 130 % 1. Were all QAIQC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Method rvon-<onformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Relpase of this data is atithnri7ed by thp arcrimpanying signed project c.nvpr letter. The ar.rnmpanying rover 1patpr,prnject narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data repon. Method Reference, Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydnx:arbons,MA DEP 0 998). Report Notations. BRL indicates concentration,H any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon.range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 mCS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations.. 0 n-C9 to n-02 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration roe the o-C9 to n-6 0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. Is Analyte ellitp.-;in the n-C-5 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrnc.arbnns range. Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GJ40tlNDWAT�R ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GOPID/FID Field)D: MW-SD Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oill Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. Client: Bennett&O-Reilly,Irtc H I VOA Vial Preservation: CI fool Laboratory ID: 69408-04 QC Batch 10: YG10-2042-W Received: 02-06-04 12:50 Sampled: 02-004 12:10 Instrument ID: GG10 HP 6890 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 02-17-04 15:16 Analyst: PO Dilution Factor. 1 n-LS to n-CB Ali ha tic H/drocarbons to BRL ug/L -- 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Ali hatic Hydrocarbons ® BRL n-C9 to n.{10 Aromatic H rorar•bons t L 20 BRL ug ug/ft L 20 u n C5 to n C8 Aliphatic iydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 Lnadiu tee n�9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 1634-044 Methyl(err-bu I Ether' BRL 5' 71—t3-2 Benzene' BRL 108-85-3 Toluene R 100-41-4 BRL ug/L 5 Eth (benzene s BRL ug/L 5 1 S-4 and 10t:d.3 meta-X lene and ara-X ene' 8RL 95-47-6 X u 5 ordto- fene= BRL ug/L 5 91-20 3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 103 103 % 70 130% _ 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 108 108 % 70- 130 % 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? 2. Were all I•serformance/acceptance standards for the required A/ Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified n o�ti��? Yes No Me"non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of Oris dam is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accanpanying cover letter,project nartativo and quality control report are considered part of this dam report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: ORL Indicates concentration.if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be.reliably quantified under routine laboramry operating conditions- Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 nGS to n.C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analytP concentrations. 0 n•C9 to n{12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n•C9 to r►.00 Aromatic Hydrocarbons rang'- = Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. t Analyse elutes in the r C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GR 3UNLnVATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile.Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GGPIDARD Field ID- MW-6S Mauir— Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJE002-3490 Container 40 mL VOA Via] Client. Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation- 1-11011 Coal Laboratory ID: 69408-05 . QC Batch ID: VCI0-2042-W Sampled: 02-05-04 13.00 Instrument ID: GC-10 HP 6890 Received: 02-464)4 12:50 Sample Volume- 5 mL Analyzed: 02-17-04 15:57 Dilution Factor. I Analyst: PO aii --illa n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons" BRL ug(L 20 n-C9 to ne-Cl 2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons*® BRL ug(L 20 n-C9 to no-Cl 0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 20 Unaadiwgcd ne-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 20 [_Unadjusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 20 1634 04 4 1 Methyl tert-butyl Ether BRL ug/L 5 71-43-2 Benzene>zBRL ug/L 1 108-88-3 Toluene BRL ug/L 5 100-41-4 Ethvibenzene BRL ug(L 5 1 10t138-3 and 106-42-31 meta-Xylene and para-Xylene' BRL ug(L 5 I 95-47-6 ortho- X lene s BRL ug(L 5 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L S 2L .............. 2.5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 93 93 % 70-130 % 2-9-Dibrerementoluprip.(FID) 100 102 1 102 % 70-130 % -... . �.. !...:-:.-L- 11:K -- --:-,-.- xW -------- ...... .... ................ 1. Were all QAIQC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all perfoffnance(accepmnce standards for the required QA/Qt procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Method non conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data isairthnri7ed by the arcrimparrying signed project cnvp.r le ter. The arrnmrianying envpr lets,project narrativp and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Melhod Reference- Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. 00 n-C9 to re-Cl 2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyre concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n,-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. Analyte elutes in the n-CS to n-r8 Aliphatic Hyderwartinns ranges. Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to re-Cl 2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUVOWATFR ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GUPID/F1D Field ID: MW-6D Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 40 mL VOA Vial Cl ient: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: Hel/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-06 . QC Batch ID: VG70-2042-W Sampled: 02-05-04 12:50 Instrument ID: GC-10 HP 6890 Received: 02-06-04 12:50 Sample Volume: S mL Analyzed: 02-17-04 16:37 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: PO n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons r0 BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug(L 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug(L 20 Unadiusted n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons r BRL ug/L 20 ! Unadiusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons r I BRL ug/L 1 20 CAS:Nz = 77515 edeu+tr�6on _.i Nair linitsa` :.^^ ue 1634-04 4 I Methyl ten-butyl Ether' BRL ug/L 5 71-43-2 - ...�..--- I Benzene' BRL ug/L 1 108.88-3 Toluene a BRL ug/L 5 100-41-4 Eth (benzene= BRL ug/L 5 10&3&3 arx!10&42-3 meta-X lene and ara-Xylene' BRL ug/L 5 9547-6 ortho- X lene' I BRL ug/L 5 91-20-3 .Naphthalene BRL ug/L j 5 11 25-Dibromotoluene(PID) 1 100 103 1 103 % 70-130% 2,5-Dibromotoluene MD) 100 109 109 % 70-130% : QECc+�ifirabwa s 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance(accepmnce standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant mudilicaiions made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.17 No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality 1 control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative Land quality mntml report are considered part of this data report Method Reference: Method for the 13etennination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any%urrngatels)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 rrC5 to n-C8 Aliphatic I lydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. 0 n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range dam excludes the method target analyte cuncenuations and the concentration for the n-C9 w rrCIO Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. a Analyse elutes in the n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. # Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GRQL DVOWATER ANALY77CAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GUPID/FID Field ID: MW-1 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H,0/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-07 . QC Batch ID: VGW2042-W Sampled: 02-05-04 14.45 Instrument ID: GC-10 HP 6890 Received: 02-06-04 12:50 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 02-17.04 17:18 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: PO n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons+0 BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t® BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 nad• ed WE to n-C8 Ali hatic H drocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 n C9 to n�12 Ali hatic Hydrocarbons f BRL ug/L 20 -- 1634-04-4 methyl tert-butyl Ether' BRL ug/L 5 7143-2 Benzene" .. —_ BRL ug/L 1 I 108-88-3 Toluene' I BRL ug/L 5 10041-4 Fth lbenze.ne` BRL ug/L 5 i 10a3&3 and IOsa2-3 meta-X lene and para-X lene s BRL ug/L 5 95-47-6 ortho- Xylene s BRL ug/L 5 91-20-3 Naphthalene--.-- I BRL ug/L 5 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 101 701 % 70-130% 2,5-Dibromotoluene(F1D) 12-1 100 110 6. 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Ye, I 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes i 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 1 1.3.2.1? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of thic data rppnrt. ; Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte_ Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. + Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogates)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbuns range data excludes die method target analyte concentrations. 0 n{9 to n{12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte rnnrontrations and the concentration for the n{9 to n-CI G Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. rs Analyte elutes in the n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range Arralyte erules in the n{9 to n{12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GR011111 WATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJPID/FID Field ID.- MW-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oilill1roolm RdJB002-3490 Container. 40 mt.VOA Vial Client- Sennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCl I Coal Laboratory ID: 6940848 QC Batch ID- VGI0-2042-W Sampled: 02-05-" 14:45 Instrument ID: CC-10 HIP 6890 Received.- 024)6-" 12:50 Sample Volume: S ml. Analyzed: 02-17-04 19:19 Dilution Factor. 2 Analyst- PO n-CS to n-CB Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 40,0 40 n-C9 to n-C1 2 Aliphatic H Yd to rbon5 BRL /L X 009 40 n-C9 to n-Cl 0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 43 ug(L 40 7r F�Ustecl rrCS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL— ug/L 40 Unadluged n-C9 to n-C1 2 AiiDhatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug(L 40 7`1-- I......... 1634--04-4 Methyl tert-butyl Ether BRL ug/L 10 71-43-2 Benzene BRL ug/L 2 108-88-3 Toluene BRL ug/L 10 100-41-4 Ethyl benzene BRL I ug/L -10 IM38-3 and 106-42.3 meta-Xviene and pand-Xylene' BRL ug/L 10 975-47-6 — 9�- X ferle; BRL ug(L 10 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 10 2,5 7 brornotoluene(PID) 100 104 104 % 70-130% 2_5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 107 107 % 70-130% 1. Were all QAIQC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Wore all performance/acceptance vmncl2rds for the required QA14QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 1 1.3.2.It No i Method nowconfurmances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the arcrinirianying project narrative and project quality control report Release of this data is authorized by the acconiviinying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,Project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adimted fur sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range dare excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range- 0 n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrincarbons range data excludes the method target analyze concentrations. 0 0-C9 to n-C1 2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze concentrations and the crincentration for the rb-C9 to rii.-Cl 0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydroi.-drbuns range. 4: Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-CI 2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range- Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200,228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA02532 ��uNflwA�R - ANALYMAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GUPID/FID Field ID: MW-4 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil?Biroola RdJBO02-3490 Container. 40 ml.VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCl/Cool Laboratory ID: 694OB-09 QC Batch ID: VC10-2042-W Sampled: 02-05-04 15:20 Instrument ID: GC-10 HP 6890 Received: 02-06-04 12.50 Sample Volume: S mL Analyzed: 02-17-04 21:20 Dilution Factor 1 Analyst: PO n{5 to n-C8 Ali hatic Hydrocarbons i 0 BRL ug/l 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic H drocarbore; BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' 23 ug/L 20 Unadituted n:g5 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 20 Un d-usted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t 25 ug/L 20 FJk53Slutoher' ! - .-. T 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl Ether' BRL ug/L 5 71-43-2 Benzene' BRL ug/L 1 --.--- 108-88-3 Toluene ' BRL ug/L 10041-4 Ethylbenzene r _ BRL ug/L 5 tob38-3 and 10642.3 meta-X Iene and para-X Iene' BRL ug(L 5 95-47-6 F'N; rtho- X Iene` BRL ug/L 5 91-10 3 phthalene BRL ug/L 5 ._ .. . : -....... . : P iced..- ifeLir' ':— 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) i 1'00 104 104 % 70-130% 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 107 107 % 70-130% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for dre required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3- Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed pmjert cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality cuhhtrul report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified tinder routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 nCS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to rrC10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. A Analyte elutes in the n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. t Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 G 3UNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJPID/FID Field ID: SEA-1 Matrix: j Aqueous Project: Hubbard OiU Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container. 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCI/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-10 . QC Batch ID: VC10-2042-W Sampled: 02-05-04 15:50 Instrument ID: CC-10 HP 6990 Received: 02-06-04 1250 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 02-17-04 22:00 Dilution Factor. 2 Analyst: PO n{5 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrucarbons t 0 INS 0 _ n-C9 to n{I2 Aliphatic Hvdrocarbons'® 2,300 ug/L 40 '10 ug/L 40 dOG`t%o n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic rocarbons t 6,600 ug(L 40 Unad'us ed n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ' 1,500 ug/L 40 x L Unadtusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t 12,000 I ugh 40 i 1634-04-4 J Meth I ter-bu I Ether" BRL - - ug(L 10 '7N 71-43-2 Benzene 9 1. ug/L 2 5 10848-3 Toluene ° 620 ug/L 10 ICOO 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene r 470 u L 10 -7;M I 106363 and 10"2.3 meta-X lene and ara-Xvlene' 11800 ug(L 10 95-47-6 ortho- X lene 930 I ug(L 10 91-20 3 Naphthalene 280, u B/L 10 ?0 Spiked 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) i 100 110 111 % 70. 130% 25-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 120 ( 118 % 70- 130% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specked in Section 11.3.2.1? No MPthnd nnn-ennfomunces indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are cunsidered part of this darn repot Method Reference: Method for the Determination nt Vnlatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP 0 998). Report Notations; BRL Indicates concentraton,if any,is below reporting limit foranalyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating comlitione. Repurtlug limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n.C5 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydnuarbons range data excludes the method target analyre concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to rh{TO Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. a Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. t Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to nL12 Aliphatic Hydromrbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P_O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 EROUPlOWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJPID/FID Field ID: SEA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Cnntainer. 40 mL VOA Via) Client. Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: "Cl/Cool Laboratory ID: 6940E-11 . QC Batch 10: VG10-2042-W Sampled: 02-05-04 15:30 Instrument ID: GC-10 HP 6890 Received: 02-06-04 12:50 Sample Volume: 5 ml. Analyzed: 02-17-04 22:40 Dilution Factor 1 Analyst: PO 11-CS to r1 8 All ;tic Hydrocarbons'0 I 34 ug/L 20 � 9p6 n-C9 to n-12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t e Sao ug/L 20 ff x n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' 770 ug/L 20 I Unad' n-CS to n-CB Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t 34 u&(L 20 Unadiu ed n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,300 ug/L 20 - ---=-fin 1634 04 4 Methyl tert-butyl Ether BRL ug/L 5 71-43-2 Benzene' BRL ugh ---- j- 108-88-3 Toluene' BRL u 5 100-41-4 Eth (benzene' - BRL ug/L 5 I 1063b3 WW 10&41-3 meta-X lene and ara-X lene' BRL I ug/L 5 95 47-6 ortho- X lene` BRL ug/L 5 91-20.3 Naphthalene 13 ug/L 5 ? PGdet+ _ M -- -.- ._.. 2,5-Dibromutoluene(PID) 100 110 114 % 70-130 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 95 95 % 70-130% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? yes 2. Were all perform ance(acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 1 1.3.2.1? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative Land quality control report are considered part of this data report. _ Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below rv1»rting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. f• Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze concentratium. 0 n-C9 to nC 12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the methnd target analyze concentrations and the concentration for the rr•C9 to n-C10 Arumadc Hydrocarbons range. is Analyze elutes in the nC5 to nC8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. 3 Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to nC12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200,228 Main Street,.Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GR XADMTER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJFID Field 1D: GZMI Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 1 Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-12 , QC Batch ID- EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 13:30 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 02-06-04 1250 Sample Volume: 1,000 ml. Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 m1 Analyzed(AL): 02-1804 03:22 Aliphatic Dilution Factor 1 Analyzed(AR): 02-18-04 04-05 Aromatic Diluion Factor. 1 Analyst: WN n-C9 to n-Cl8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons+ - BRL ug/L 500 n-Cl I to n-C22 Aromatic Hydroaarbons t° 160 ug/L 160 Unadhgled n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 170 ug/L 160 _: Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 34 8S % 40-140% _ 2-Bromona hthalene 40 34 66 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 22 55 % 40-140% ortho Terphenyl 40 31 78 % 40-140% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all perfomrancelacceptance standards for die required QA(QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method nonconformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover later. She accompanying criver letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Sample extraction performed by separahsry funnel technique. Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogates)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-Cl 1 to r►C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GRDUNDNIIG4TFR - ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GCJMS-SIM Field ID: GZA-1 Matrix: Aquas Pmjem Hubbard Oil!Brooks Rd./8002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-12 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 13:30 Instrument ID: MS-6HP6890 Received: 02-06.04 12:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 02-184314 11:49 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: JIT Z Naphthalene BRLuglL 2-Methyfnaphthalene BRL ug/L0.8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene 0.8 ug/L 0.5 3co 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 0.5 ug 206-44-0 Fluoranthene 2.2 L 0.5 129-00-0, Pyrene 1.4 00 ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 I Benzo(a(anthraceneI US _ -"U� 218-01-9 Chrysene g . 1, 205-99.2 Benzo(b]fluoranthene .1 ug/L 0.1 210 2 9 1. - u 0.1 I ,0 5D-32-8 ene 0.9 ug/L 0.1 11.0 Benzo(a]pyrene 0.9 ug(L 0.1 0,2- 193 39 5 Indeno(1,2,3-c,dlpyrene 1.0 ug/L 0.1 0.7 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracenP 0.2 ug/L 0.1 ,,j:�- 197-24-2 Benzo[g h,ilperylene 1.1 ug/L 0.1 ?o 0 ortho-Terphenyl 40 30 76 "6 40.1q0 0� Method Reference: Test Mrthods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(199fi). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the medtod. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance witfi the MA DEP Method for the Oetertnination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notatiorm BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting Ifmft for anatyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboraiory operating conditions. Reporting IinriU err adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GI�QIAVDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJFI D Field ID: GZA 2 Maui= Aqueous Project: Hubbard OiV Brooks RdJ8002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc.' Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-13. QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 024)5-04 13:30 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 02-06-04 12.50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AU: 02-18-04 04:49 Aliphatic Dilution Factor. 1 Analyzed(Aft 02-184014 05:32 Aromatic Dilution Factor 1 Analyst- WN n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug(L Soo n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ugf Soo n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 10 BRL ugtL 160 Unadiusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 170 ug/L 160 QESerr�aGe> —._::,... :- . ...:�t�:_.r..----....._ _ :. ��aw� .,.-_. - .. : _�-•:__-�..==:c_���ilr+ti�__ — Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 35 88 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 36 89 % 40_140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane_ 40 21 51 % qo_140 ortho-Terpheny! 40 32 80% 40-140% - tiz it 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required WQC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No i Method non-confor lances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report Release of this dam is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered pan of this data report Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Exhactable Petroleum Hydmcarhnns,MA DEP(1998). Sample extrdcYiun perfurmed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is die lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surtogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C11 to n{22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GRMNDMTER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynucaear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GUMS-S1M Field ID: GZA-2 Matrix: Aqua Project- Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd-/B002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-13 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-f Sampled: 02-05-04 13:30 Instrument ID: Ms-6 HP 6890 Rer:eived: 02-06-04 72:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 ml. Analyzed: 02-18-04 12:27 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: JJT G1 W 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57.6 2-Methylnaphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene _- _ BRL ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL u 0.5 -� 85-01 8 Phenanthrene 0.9 ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene - -� BRL ug/L 0.5 206 440 Fluotanthene 2.2 ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene 1.4 ug/L 0.5 v 56-55-3 Senzo[alanrhracene 0.6 ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene 1.0 ug/L 1 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.0 ug/L 0.1 032-8 50.32 8 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.8 ug/L 1 0.1 t. Benzo[alpyrene 0.8 ug/L I 0.1 193-39-3 Indena[1,2,3r,d1pyrP.ne 0.8 ug/L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.2 ug/L 0.1 191-24.2 Benzo[g h j1perylene - T 0.8 ug/L 0.1 'QCSumegakeCosnpiwnd_.,._ Staked -Recavv= - - EYimtts orrho-Terphenyl 40 32 81 °� --- 40- 140 °! Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW846,Third Edition,Update III.(19961: � -x�. Methud modified by use of selected ion monitoring(Simi in accordance with Section 7.5.5'of'tXe method. Method protocol modified to include acidification drui the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extrartinn performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are.adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 ANALYT/CAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC1F1 D Field ID: MW-s5 Matrix.- Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-14 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 •12:00 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP SSW Reretved. 024)6.04 12:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 cal Extracted: 024)9.04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 02-18-04 06:15 Aliohatic Dilution Factor; 1 Analyzed(AR): 02-18-04 06:59 Aranatir.Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: WN n{9 to n{18 Aliphatic H dr�trbans+ � BRL ---- - n-C19 to n-C36 Ali hatfc Hydrocarbons 500 ' BRL uF/L 50o n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic — rbons I° BRL u 160 FUDad-ust n-C1 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL uj/L 160 Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 33 82 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 35 87% 40-140% Extraaion: Chloro-octadecane 40 21 53 % 40-140% ortho-Terpheny) I 40 30 1 75 % 40-140% _ - - - — 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specked in Section 11.3? No Method nonconfonmances indicated above are detailed below on this dam report or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality rnntrol report are considered part of this data repot Method Reference. Method for the Determination of Eatracrable Petroleum Hydrocarbons.MA DEP(1998). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C1 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay,.MA 02532 4f ANRA�LINDVII(ATFI? . LYMAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuciear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GUMS-SIM Field ID: MW 5S Marx: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-14 QC Batch ID: EP-132" Sampled: 02-0S-04 12:00 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 02-06-04 12.50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09.04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 02-18-04 13:06 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: JI]T 91-20.3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L —'0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyinaphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acena hthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL u L 11 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthricene BRL ug/L 0.5 206-aad Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 ne BRL ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo(a]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo(b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 2074%-9 Senzo(k]fluoranthene BRL ug%L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo(a] rene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 Indeno(1,2,3c,d(pyrene BRL u L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo(aManthracene BRL ug/L 01 991-24-2 BenzoI&h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 0.1 urtha-jerphenyl 1 40 1 31 77 % - - 40_1 % Method Reference Test Mediuds for Evaluating Solid waste,Us EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update 111(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory uperdting conditions. Reporting limits an:adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FI D Field ID: MW-SD Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard OW Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Preservation: H2504/Cool Laboratory ID: 69405-15 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 12:10 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 02-06-04 12:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 02-18-04 07:42 Aliphatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 02-18-04 08:25 Aromatic Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: - WN n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL — ug/L 500 n-C19.to n-C36 Ali phatic Hydwarbons BRL ug/L Soo n-C11 to n- 22 Aromatic H droc2rbons r° BRL I ug/L 160 Unad' n C11 to n-C22 Aromatic H drocarbons t BRL ug/L 160 4001 _- Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphe nyl 40 28 69 .6 40-140 0% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 28 71 % 40-140% .Extraction: ChIoro-octadecane 40 19 47% 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 25 62%, 40-140 q, 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all oertorrt+ance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the mediod,as specified in Secfinn 11.31 _ No Method non-conformances indicated'above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report Method Reference-. Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for anatyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under mutine lahnratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. + Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogates)and/or internal standards eluting in drat range. 0 n-C1 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target anatyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWAT� ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GUMS-SIM Field ID: MW-5D Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Matrix: Aqueous Client: Bemtett&O'Reilly,inc. Container. 1 L Amber Glass Preservation: H2SO4/Coot Laboratory ID: 69408-15 Sampled: 02-05-04•12:10 QC Batch ID: EP-132&-F Received: 02-06-04 12:50 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Analyzed: 02-18-04 13:44 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyst: 1JT Dilution Factor. 1 - _.. :- 1-20-3 Naphthalene BRL 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 0.5 208-9fr8 Acenaphthylene BRL u91L I 0.5 83-32-9 BRL ug/L 0 5 Acenaphthene BRI 86-73-7 Fluorene -- ug/L 0� 85-01-8 BRL _ j up,/L 0.5 Phenanth re 0.6 —' 12012-7 Anthracene ug1L 0.5 206 44 0 , Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0 5 124 00-0 Pyrene I 1�4 ug/L 0.5 5Cr55-3I Benzo[a]anthracene 0.0.9 3 U ug/L 0-5 ;'� 1218-01-9 Chrysene ug/L 0.1 I,p F205-99-2 U_6 ug/L 0.1 1,0 BenzoMfluoranthene ug/L 01 I. 207-08 9 j Ben zo[k]fluoranthene 0.4 ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo[a]PYrene 0.4 193-39-5 In de no[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 0.4 53-70.3 _ Dibenzo[a,hjanthratene u L 0.1 191-24 2 I Benzo(g h 7Perylene 0.1 u fJ 0.5 P/. 0.1 Co>t�o�md.... u 0 L 1 ogaix�ortho.-!eEehenyl - 65 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wdsle,u5 EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Up date III(1996). - MPthod modified by use of selected ion monitoring(Sim)in accordance with Sxtion 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze.. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration thdt can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, lnc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 j GRCHAYO IATEI? ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCAI D Field ID: MW-6s Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oit Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-16 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 13:00 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 02-06.04 12-50 Sample Volume: 1,000 ml _ Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 ml Analyzed(AL): 02-17-04 19--31 Aliphatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 02-17-04 20.10 Aromatic Murton Factor: 1 Analyst: WN n-C9 to n-C18 Ali hatic H !carbons' --- - - BRL - u L _ 500 rt-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug(L 500 n-C1 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydroinarbons t° BRL ug/L 160 Unadiusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 160 Fractionation: 2-Fluorobi hen I 40 38"- --- 95 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 40 . 100 % 40-14O% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 30 76 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 34 85 % 40-140% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? -: - -4i Ji-^ Yes Z. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC prorpdunec achieved? yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.31 No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report arp considered part of this data report Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1993). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below mponing limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for.ample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogatefs)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n{l 1 to r►C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes die method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200,228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GJ4DL�IVD "TER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GUMS-SIM Field ID: MW-0S Matrix: Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container 1mAqueous Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc- 1 LAmber Glass Preservation: H25O4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-16 QC Batch ID: EA-1326-F Sampled: 02-0S-04 93:00 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 02-064)4 12:50 Extracted: 02-09.04 i8:30 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Analyzed: 02-18-04 14:23 Final Volume: 1 will. Analyst: NT Dilution Factor. 1 91-20-3 Naphthalene — — •`-` �- - =- � _ BRL ug/L 0.5� 91-57-6 2-Me.thylnaphthalene BRL 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene u 0.5 1 83-32-9 Acenaphth_ene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene" BRL u 0.5BRL 85-01-8 Phenanthn'ne ug/L 0.5 BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL 206-44-0 Fluoranthene ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene 0.7 ug/L 0.5 goo BRL ug(L 0.5 5Cr55 3 Ben zo[aJanthracene 0 2 ( �218-01-9 Chrysene ug/L 0.1 ,O 0.3 ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 _ Benzo[biflunranthene 0.3 207-08-9 Ben 0.2 zo(k(fluoranthene ug/L 0.1 p t 1 50-328 Benzo[ajpyrene ug/L 0 0.2 , I 193-39-5 ]praycreennee 0.2 ug/L 53-70 3 ug/L 0.1 BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Berizo(g h,ilperylene 0.2 ug/L 0.1 - -Oil .. f ortho-Terphenyl 40 1 32 81 % 1 -- 40-140 % Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(Sim)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method pmtocol modified to include acidification and the suntr&te compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C Report Notations•. 8111. Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 r �ouNowAT� ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJFID Field ID: MW-6D Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard OiV Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client:. Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-17 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 12:50 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP S890 Received. 02-06-04 12-50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09-04 18_30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AU: 02-17-04 20-53 Aliphatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 02-17-04 21:37 Amirdtic Ditudon Factor. 1 Analyst WN n-C9 to n-Cl8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL _ ugtL 500 nn--C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t0 BRL ug(L t60 �adiusted n-Cl 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 160 - .�L-1-vt1� Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 36 90 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 38 94 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-oinadecane 40 22 55 % 40_140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 1 34 84 % 40_ 140% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method fnllnwvdd yes 2. Were all perfonnancelacceptance standdrds for the required QA/QC procedures achieved( yg 3_ Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? Nn Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrdtive and project quality control report Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered pan of this data report Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory uperating conditions_ Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or intemal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C11 to n{22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200,228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 GROLINDWi4TFR • ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic-Hydrocarbons by GUMS-SIM Field 1D: MW-6D Matrix. Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd-/8002-3490 Aqueous Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Container. 1 L Amber Glass Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-17 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 12:50 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 02-06-04 12:50 Sample Volume i,000 mL Extracted: 02.09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 ml.. Analyzed: 02-18-04 7s:01 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst JJT 91-20-3 Naphthalene —� BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene BRL 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 ug/L 0.5 83-33-9 Acena hthene -- BRL 8fr73-7 Fluorene ug/L 0.5 BRL I - u�/L 0.5 85-01$ Phenanthrnne BRL �' 12012-7 Anthrarxne ug/L 0.5 BRL ug/L 0.5 206-44 0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 rene BRL ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[alanthracene gRL 218-01-9 Chrysene ug/L 1 0.1 BRL ug/L 0.1 205 99 1 Benzo[bjfluoranthene BRL I ug/L 0.1 207-08.9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene EIRL ug/L 0.1 150 32-8 �Benzo[aj rene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ug/L 0.1 BRL ug/L 191-24-2 1 Benzo[g,h i]perylene BRL ug/L 0.1 itecorery-'= i ortho-Terphenyl 40 34 85 q 40. 140 % Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by-use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and die surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DFP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that cdn be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 L_- GR�LINDVIIIAATEiR . ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GGFID Field ID: MW-1 Matritc Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bermett&O'Reilly, Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID 694(8-18 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-0S-04 14:45 Instrument ID: GC-7 HP 3890 Received: 02.06-04 12:50 Sample Vo)ume 1,W0 cal Extracted: . 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 cat Analyzed(AL): 02-17-04 22:20 Aflphatic uitution Factor. 7 Analyzed(Aft 02-17-04 23:03 Aromatic Dilution Factrsr: 1 Analyst: WN ._.._.•_, -- - --•:: -- -_-._.. . _hies=-:. �_ :rr�s. a n-C9 to n-C18 Ali hatic H rocarbons} 700 ug/L Soo a �� n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydmrarbons BRL ug/L Soo 5C n-C11 to n-M Aromatic Hydrocarbons'° _450 ug/L 160 <( Unadigged n-C11 to n- 22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' 1 450 ug/L 160 Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 37 93 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 40 100 % 40-140% Fxtraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 26 64% 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 33 82 % 40_140% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all perfnrnance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modtfications made to the method,as specified in Section 113? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report Release of this data is authorized by the accomparrying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Fxtrdcubte Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Sample extraction perfiorned by separatory funnel technique. Repnrt Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for anadyte. Reporting limit is the lowest coneevrtretiun that can be reliably quantified under mutirw laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. f- Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or intemal standards eluting in that range o n{11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte cnnrentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GR 31JNDMTER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GUMS-SIM Field ID: MW-1tri Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 mber Glass Client: Bennet&O'Reilly,Inc Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-18 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05434 14:45 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 0246-04 1750 Sample Volume: 1,006 mL Extracted: 024)9-04 1830 Final Volume: 1 ml. Analyzed: 02-18-04 15.39 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: J)T 91-20-3 Naphthalene - - BRL — — ug/L 0 5 91-57-6 2-Meth Ina thalene BRL 208- ug/L 0.5. 96-8 Acenaphth lene BRL ug/L 0.5 � 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL _ _ L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluore BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L _-0.5 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[alanthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo(blfluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Senzo(klfluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo[alpyrene BRL u 0.1 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,dlpyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,hlanthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g,hA lerte BRL ug/L 0.1 ortho-Terphenyl 40 33 82 °6 40 140 96 Method Reference. Test Methnds for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW846,Third Edition,Update In(1996). Method modified by use of selected inn monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compnund in accordance with the MA DEP method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc-, P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 un�AT� ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GGFID Field ID: MW-2 Matrix Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Prewrvation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-19 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 '14:45 instrument ID: GC-7 HP 5890 Received' 02.06-04 12:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 02-17-04 23-46 Aliphatic Dilution F2=r. 1 Analyzed(AR): 02-18-04 00.29 Aromatic Dilution Factor 1 Analyst WN — - - BRL _ - n-C9 to n{18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ug/L Soo n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' BRL u&L s00 n Cl 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydror2rbons 4° BRL u L 160 n-C1 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' BRL uWL 160 Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphen 1 40 36 1 91 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 39 97 % 40-1 qe Extraction: Chloro-octadecanP 40 27 68 °,ti 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 34 85 % 40.140 96 1. Were all QA/QC Pmaedures required by the method followed? - — - Y --= _ 2. Were all Performancelaccepmnce standards for the.required QA/QC procedures achieved? es Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 1 1.3? No Method nonconfori nanrxs indicated above are detailed below on this dam report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality mntml report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,pmjPrt narrative 1 and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference- Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,NIA DEP(1998). Sample extraction performed by separatory,funnel technique. Repurt Notations. BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyse. Reporting limit is the lowebt concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. o n-C11 to n.C22 Aromatic Hydnxerbons range dam excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P-O.Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 GROLNVOWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GCJMS-SIM Field ID: MW-2 Mix: Aqua Project: Hubbard OIU Brooks RdJ6002-1490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Cl ient: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-19 QC Batch ID. EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-0S-04 14:45 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 02-06-04 12.50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extra(tpd: 02-09.04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 02-18-04 16:17 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: JIT IiiO-'= 91-20-3 Naphthalene-__.. BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene j BRL URIC 1 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene - BRL ug.L 1 0.5 i 83-32-9 Arena htht:ne BRL ! URIC 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL t1g/l. 0.5 85-01-8 ! Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL ug/L 0.5 _206440 Fluoranthene BRL u 0.5 129-00-0Pyrene BRL ! ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo(alanthracene BRL ug/L 01 '' 218-01-9 I Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo(blfluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k]Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo(a]pyrene BRL URIC 1 0.1 I9 -39-5 Indenof1,2,3 ,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 ! 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRI. URIC 0.7 191-24-2 Benzo[&h,ilperylene BRL ug/L 0.1 Q.CSiierogate:('ixapotu� ::_. - - _ _ SPied. ---. u.._._ atcuvery-r _ QC Lints I ortho-Terphenyl _ 40 I 33 1 83 % ! 40-140 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wdste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the inethud. method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Eirrme.inble Petroleum Hydrocarbons_ Sample exvaaion performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analytc. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 l 6RDAWwaT ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJFID Field ID: MW-0 Matrix: Project: Hubbard Oil/Sroohs RdJB002-3490 AqueousContainer. i L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-20 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04'15:20 Instrument 1D: GC-7 HP 5890 Received: 02-06-04 12.50 Sample Volume. 1,000 ml Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AU: 02-18-84 01:12 Aliphatic Dilution Factor 1 Analyzed(AR): 02-18-04 01:56 Aromatic Dilution Factor 1 Analyst WN n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic H rorarbons t BRL -_ug/L S00 4�c n-C19 to n-C36 Ali hark H rocarbons r n-CI1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons r° 180 BRL ug/L 500 y W ug/L n "us n{t 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 180 uPIL tan Fractionation: 2-Flucrobiphenyl 40 38 — - = -- 96 % 40-140% 2-Bromona hthalene 40 39 99 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 29 73% ortllo-Temhenyl 40 34 40-140 96 86 % 40-140% 1• Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? 2. Were all performarKwacceptance standards for the Yes required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 1 T_3? No Method non-confomunces indicated above are deWled below on this data report,or in the accompanying Project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed Project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference Method inn the Determination of Exuacttble Petroleum I lydmcarbom,MA DEP(1998)- Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below rvponine limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C1 1 to n{22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200,228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 SR13UA DMTER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GUMS-SIM Field 1D: MW-4 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJBO02-3490 Container_ 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-20 QC Batch 1D: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 15:20 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 02-06-04 1250 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09.04 18:30 Final Volume: I mL Analyzed: 02-18-04 1656 Dilution Factor. I Analyst: JJT ,._:. = :-�---�..--=-�;:.:_—_:-;:_c:-� _..— '._=:-y=--=�.�11eTY5_�:;:_•�:= `_= riot=+-' 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene _ _ BRL ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acena hthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene BRL _ ug/L O.S 20&44-0 Fluoranthene BRL — ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 i 56-55-3 Benzola]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 21"1-9 I Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-_ Benzo[a] rene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39 5 Indenol1,2,3c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 0.1 ortho-Terphenyl — 40 34 I 86 % 40-140% Method Reference: Test Methods fur Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 75.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Deterrn inatinn of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C Report Notations BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is tyre IuweA concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GRIQUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJFID Field ID: SEA-1 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-21 QC Batch ID: F9-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 1S:50 instrument ID: GC-7 HP S890 Received: 024)6-04 12.50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 02-18-04 03:22 Aliphatic Dilution Factor. 1 Analyzed(AR): 02-18.04 04:05 Aromatic Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: WN n-C9 to n C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons r 16,000 ug/L S00 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons r 2,3W ug/L S00 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons"° 7,300 ug/L unadiusted n-Ci 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' 7,700 —ug/L 160 -- - Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 43 108 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 41 102 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 140 29 72 % 40-140 5- ortho-Terphenyl 1 40 27 68 % 40-140% ` - -- --— — .._ .; 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. were all perforrnance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method nonconformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project Dover letter. the accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality cormol — ... . _.-_ .---.—. report are Considered .. ._ .._....... .. .. ... ..._. . . ... . . ... pattvfdris��eport. ._— ... Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP t 1999). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentratiun,if any,is below reporting limit fur dndlylr. Reporting limit is Ilre lowest COMxrrlydtion Ural can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range dam excludes concentrations of any surrogams)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C1 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocaybons range data excludes the method target anatyre concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROMOWAT ER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GCJMS-51M Field ID: SEA-1 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./9002.3490 Container_ 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-21 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 1550 Insirumeent ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 02-06.04 1250 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-094)4 18:30 Final Volume: 1 col Analyzed: 02-18-04 17:34 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: 11T CAS>acsftbec= -_y::_.-_::_:_..::_:-.:.. :.._-,....... 91-20-3 Naphthalene 48 a ug/L I 0.5 ?-� 91-57.6 .2-Methylnaphthalene 79 a ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Aces hth lease BRL USIL 0.5 63-32-9 Acenaphthene 4.7 1 ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene 11 ug/L I 0.5 3R� 85-01-8 Phenanthrene i 16 ug/L 0.5 ?b0 120-12-7 Anthracene _ _ _ 1.8 ug/L 0.5 2.1cti' 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pynene I 1.7 ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 _ 218-01-9 ChrysPne. BRL ugh. 0.1 205-99.2 Benzo[b]ftuoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k)fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 Ind eno[1,2,3-c d]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 53=70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 0.1 _ —.._...._...------ -..._..... .... _.... QS!+cFogate�o> d.' --- =. SP.iked:. Meastt^ : Re�utKry.. QC...Wa'v_.... ortho-Terphenyl 40 21 t 53 % 40-140 % Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction pe owned by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: 8RL India a[es cuncentretiu , in urH rt for analyse. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified er rou i borato conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. e Indicates content tion exceeded on range f r the analyte. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon*s by GUMS-SIM Field ID: SEA-1 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oilf Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. I L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-21RAI QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 15:50 Instrument 10; MS-6 HP 6II90 Received: 02-064)4 112:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 024)9-04 18:30 Final Volume: I mL Analyzed: 02-19-04 15:23 Dilution Factor. 10 Analyst: JJT 91-20-3 Naphthalene 57 ug/L 5.0 —Z C) 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene 100 ug/L 5.0 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 5.0 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 4.0 ug/L I 5.0 12 8&-73-7 Fluorene 10 ug/L 5-0 300 85-01-8 Phenanthrene 13 ug/L 5.0 120-12-7 T Anthracene BRL ug/L 5.0 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 570 129-W-0 Pyrerte BRL ug/L 5.0 S&-55-3 :ene' BRL ug/L 1.0 I 218-01.9 Chry5ene BRL ug/L 1.0 L205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 1.0 F-207-08-4 'Benzo[k]n uoranthene BRL ug/L 1.0 50-32-8 Benzolailpyrene BRL ug/L 1.0 193-39-5 Indenol 1,.2,3-cdlpyrene BRL ug/L 1.0 53-70w3 Dibenzo[a,h]anth race nc BRL ug/L 1.0 19T-24-2 Benzo[g,h,ilperylene BRL ug/L 1.0 F7 keid ....... -0c I ortho-Terphenyl 40 20 49 % 40-140% Method Reference.- Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update 111(1996). method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the me". Method pioLucul modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 351 Or Report Notations: BRL indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting I im it for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Indicates an estimated value detected below the reporting limit for the analyte. Groundwater.Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNUMMR . ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJFI D Field ID: SEA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project Hubbard Oilf Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Coot Laboratory ID: 69408-22 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 15:30 Instrument ID: CC-7 HP 5890 Received: 02-06 04 12:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AQ: 02-18-04 04:49 Aliphatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 02-18-04 05:32 Arom2fic Dilution Factor 1 Analyst: WN n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t 4,300 ug/L S00 QiA n{19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t 650 ug/L. 500 n-CI 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t° 1AW ug/L 160 �>> na n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic H rocarbons t 1,500 ug/L 160 Mt-- - Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphen I 40 33 83 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 33 83 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 24 59 % 40-140% ortho=ferphenyl 40 30 76 % 40-140% T. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancetaceeptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control,report- Release of this data is authori2�the accompanying signed. Protect cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,aroiecarrative t n and Quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP 0998). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyre. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C1 T to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc.,.P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 6RDLIMWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GGMS-SIM Field 1D: SEA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project. Hubbard Oitl Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Gtass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 69408-22 QC Batch ID: EP-1326-F Sampled: 02-05-04 15:30 Instrument ID: MSdi HP 6890 Received: 02-06-04 12.50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 02-09-04 18:30 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 02-18-04 18:13 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: IIT r, — •----.:.__.__ ._.__ -- .__..---:--- -----------• —r-, _...... .��_�=�- �-;�.-.^_::_tom:V:= 'Gtm 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.6 ug/L 0.5 20 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene 9.2 ug/L 0.5 10 208-96-8 Acena hth lene BRL u 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 1.4 ug/L 0.5 10 86-73-7 Fluorene 3.0 ug/L 0.5 =1 85-01-8 Phenanthrene 4.3 ug/L 0.5 , 00 120-12-7 Anthrdcene BRL ug/L 0.5 206-440 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00.0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthtacene BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 1 207-08-9 Benzo]k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzoja]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a hianthnacene BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo]g h,i]perylene BRL ug/L 0.1 onho-Terphenyl 1 40 J 25 62 % 40- 140% Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid waste,US EPA,SW-a46,Third Edition,Update 111(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion muuituring(SIM)in accordance with Smtiun 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons- Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for anatyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATO ANALYTICAL Project Narrative Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Lab ID: 69408 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 02-06-04 12:S0 -77- - - - - - - rrl►lfuAtCdt�OA. - The following documentation discrepancies,and client changes or amendments were noted for this project: 1 No documentation discrepancies,changes, or amendments were noted. i+ieddicatwns°_3NonXo9mnw%ce.'.and Observatwns The sample(s)in this project were analyzed by the references analytical method(s),and no method modifications, non-conformantes or analytical issues were noted,except as indicated below: 1 . EPA 8270C Non-conformance: Sample 69408-21. Reported results for the analyte exceeded the high standard of the associated calibration curve. Results are estimated. 2 . EPA 8270C Note: Sample 69408-2.1. Sample was diluted prior to analysis_ Dilution was required to keep all target analytes within calibration. 3 . MA DEP EPH Note:Samples 69408-12,-13;14,-15,-16;17,-18;19,20,21,22. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)target analytes were identified and quantified by GCJMS-SIM, in accordance with the method provision for alternate determinative methodologies. GUMS-51M was used to achieve low quantification limits necessary for regulatory compliance. Target analytes were determined utilizing the same sample extract used for carbon range determination by GC/FID. 4 . MA DEP VPH Note: Sample 69408-10.Sample was diluted prior to analysis. Dilution was required to keep all target analytes within calibration. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200,228 Main Street, Bt177ards Bay, MA 02532 i i i i 22e Main Street,RO,Box 1200 GROUNDIMATER Buzzards Bay,MA02632 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY REC RD ANALYTICAL Telephone(608)799.4441 a FAX(609)759.4475 AND WORK ORDER N 2 084864 w,vw.prounliwalerenetyllcel.aom Project Name: Frm: /&4(,-; nV� � TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST 01I RN. g(,kW,+ O V t l Il' }-1� � STANDARD 10 Business Dar �6 rn rr' YCUntu exnlmlrfZ1, Osranl6papairy 011y y,) IIhidr aide Project Number: Address: (� p� [ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) W-✓q`o 1673 M4•4St. /FV &A IFS ( Ci RUSH(RAN- ) III] Rush regrke,Rosh AuhorlealIII] d hn NrtgOen D e°o ° o Sampler Name: City/State/Zip: �jPlease Email to: J I D e TM SEk �S'kf MA oAJ RaaeeFAXto: 8 Project Manager. Telephone: BILLING y c{�11 T I �jq / oaoo C �UV'M 1'�t/V uV0 O (�' 6630 Purchase Order No.: ❑ Third Party Billing: 6 a 99 jj H O t D D s' INSTRUCTIONS:Use Separate ilne for each contahler(except repllcates). I I I v yl o # ❑awn Ouole: a SempllAg Matrix () o o a o o 0 0 0 a C a o 0 6 a ° Typo COntalnel a Preservation Ili y ® e C a tDENTIFCA710N $ g� a J�� g9 uNVNfB, RY 9 pp gt ° w s e a ns !a U J (lab Uee nly) i t B' d o A ' S -Me9 ��� 5ii � � i9 66 1a I I I Isar � � a a a a [ o D 0 00 a 7 cl p e a o o O a 0 a a O a a a a a a 0 t 8 Awl 2 3 3 05 '-2 ' K I� ,JD 1 3 V1 > .dp IN I ly 1u U 1� t REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD t MADEP MCP Data Enhancement Affirmation Regulatory Program Project Specific OC NOT_:All samples submIled subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. Slate Standard Dellvereb'es Marry regulatory programs and EPA method,r qufre project so by S Date The ReceNedby: ;�� perature: AYES ONO MCP 011a Cedlfleallon is eequired. 'pacific OC.Project specific OC+nciudea Se a'up Icetes, OCT ;KMCP aV/•1/8•1 ]PWS Form WON Spites.end/or Matrix Spike Duplicates. eboratory OC Is p 5,� 1D � d.d OYESONOhive nimumFlelr.QCrcqullemenls /' not roes 1M• Nec have b er met fur Ihis ro;ecl. ❑ME ❑MCP aW-2/S•2 7 MWRA project I speNllc unless preerrangee.Project psNllc Or, lGelah,hnarakrr ch,dmimn and ciewde mi/yres MA O NY 9TAR3 'empies are charged an a per Semple bees. eh MS,MSD IM Rate Tine Received by: L Comalner Count• lequhe ene dcarrta,pike pet Z2lamprer) O end Sample Duplicate requires on addlllona sample ellqua1. &H ❑Drinking Water ,OYES ONO MCP Odnllna Ware,sample,,e(uhed• ONY ❑Wastewater Project Specific DO Required Selection of SeritpI@ Ruin ad Da:e The Recs)\'�d gy�sboratory; Shlpping/Altba 'lle bf a cclle 21sc of dtr!d,gml ddpllcsle trrtphy, I 1,- Number. r blmh.,e drd.equhed,nwr ran:ykr ee/lecled? O RI ❑Waste Deposal O Semple OLOcals O P19e9e U9e 6 pie: 3�4/y 71 a k, Signature: pVT OOredge fAetellal fl Matrix Spike Melhodol Shtpmeat: GWA Courier pE press Mall OFoderal Fifre,� Custody Sear _ ❑.— 0 0 Matrix Spam Duplicate '— U .OH and 0 Number: i I I i i L7R U/ DWAM Buz Main Street,P.O.Box 12GD Buzzards Bey,MA Inssz CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECd D ANALYTICAL Telephone ,FAX(t10a)759.4475 AND WORK ORDER No 084863 wwuv.grolmdwetere na lybcal.com Project Name: Firm, TURNAROUND L ni ANALYSIS REQUEST .��� KGB ►1 (,I,I1 l "C. STANDARD(10BuldnessDeys) yablter sromuuu r r Mfg w ® . HnIvauplil r arnurcesnrrol mmr Project Nu m7mber:4 Address: M ( oJ� Q p�`� O PRIORITY(b Business Days) gN $ g& 13667-31`1O 151� I`tGih J�•/ I V W�C�C7o/ O RUS4(RAN- 1 k� d (gran rgwx awn Auromellm uuneer) Ile c °❑o o ❑ Sampler Nanm: Cl /Slate 121p: Pleeee Email lo: n $n &(AJ5{rr r !"`A '37Z� OPleaseFAXto: � p u � � � k J ry 77 0 Project Manager: BILLING Telephone: c Q o ❑ g 0 P f M 1 nn J a�� \�- 5Db 8 Q�- 6b�o �°Purchase Order No.: O�Z 3� V � � � e O ThkdPartyBlllhg: $ 8 ¢ '� 0 y ee ppo - INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except repWoates). O OY/A Quote: b § ® _ g e go o o o u BempAng Matrix type Container( Preservatlon — , a $ 1 C 0 c o o ❑ a D ❑ D i ❑ SAMPLE � LABORAT RY � � 'a f0� g MUM ga g ¢ y E reEN71FiCAM tl p ! A 5 3 3 & ° n y a s al 8 (Lab Use ly) Y u9 D ° F C00000 ❑ o ° o 000000 C oaC ° o oonooOo ❑ a ° aG S i"5 D KI-) ( 1 r.3 O Z.A L ro -Z tvr� �S 3 z-00 W E ' to -5D 00 19W- 00 ,6 (� i -CD �: 6 JJ- IL REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specille OC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions an reverse hereof. MA DEP MCP Date Enhancement Affirmation Slate Standard Dellvereb:ee Merry regulatory programs and EPA melhode riqulre project sl d r p Time fl Ned by: Pecelpl7emperolure: YES 0 NO MCP Data Certillcalinn Is repaired. specific CC.Project specific OC Includes Semple Duplicates, OCT MCP GW-1/3-1 ❑PWS Form Matrlx Spikes.end/or Matrix Spike Duplicates. aboialo OC Is ula rq.r"° OYES ONO MCP:nnlmur:-;; /' P P P 4 rY r �� h(..�i�Gw xa•;ai ,�.e Id QC re ❑ME O MCP GW-2/S-2 ❑MWRA act project specific unless prearranged.Project specific QC W a7kra calved by: ConrelnerCount:lovc 1.;Z. .4ft rtsprol^rl sempleIere charged on a oar Semplebasis.Erjch Rig,MSDdrreroirrn and cpnldr ana/yf� � ❑NY STARS ❑ end Semple Duplicate requires an addibona eampla aliquot.rpr!e pe:2o,,—j„1pNH O Drbtking Wetar ale Tlms Rer/elve2byLaboratory: Shtpping/AhbAl •YEs_ONOptrequired. ❑NY OWestawator Projeel Specille OC Required geleeaen e106 Sample // Nuoer: /feodlrcunn of mr ringrm d licak sarepks. ' J1 JZ1 /Trp AIM"err rho rrgdre4 i!VDa nn•ples rel/rcadl ❑RI, O Waste D19poSe1 O Sertpla Dupreale ]P:eeeo use vamp e:OVr O Dredg9 Materiel ❑Maul.Spaa ourier O Fxprem Mall❑Fpeoa E+pr a Custcdy Seal O— O ❑Melllx Spike Duplicate number: pVFS ONend p GROUNDWATER P.O.GroLmdwale; Analytic?:.Inc. P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL 228 tardy Strccl Say. B�uds y.MA 02532 Telephone(508)755-44-41 October 27, 2003 FAX(508)I5e-4475 wtvw.groundwateranaly:ieal.eor., Mr.John Tadema-Wielandt Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02 631 LABORATORY REPORT Project: Hubbard Oil / Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Lab I D: 65807 Received: 10-1 0-03 Dear John: Enclosed are the analytical results for the above referenced project. The project was processed for Standard turnaround. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a sample receipt report detailing the samples received, a project narrative indicating project changes and non-contormances, a quality control report, and a statement of our state certifications. The analytical results contained in this report meet all applicable NELAC standards, except as may be specifically noted, or described in the project narrative. This report may only be used or reprodur.Pd in its entirety. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Jonathan . Sanford President JRS/kal Enclosures i i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./6002-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 4'C Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Airbill. n/a Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 65807 Lab Receipt: 10-10-03 Custody Seal(,): n/a Lab ID Feld ID Matrix Sampled Method —_-�-- 'Notes 65807-1 MW-SS Aqueous 10/9/03 12:05 EPA 6010E Pb Total Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C:3132816 500 ml Plastic Froline 8X8852 HNO3 R-3593D 09-15-03 n/a Lab ID Field ID i Matrix Sampled Method Notes 65807-2 MW-6S Aqueous 10/9103 10:00 EPA 6010B Pb Total Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C362807 500 mL Plastic Proline RX8857 HNQ3 R-3593D 041.5411 n/a Lab ID Feld ID i Matrix Sampled I Method :Notes 65807-3 MW-6D f Aqueous . 10/910313:20.EPA 6010B Pb Total Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C382781 500 mL Plastic Proline BX8852 HNO3 R-3593D 09-15-03 n/a Lab ID Field ID —- __ Matrix ` Sampled'. i Method i Notes. 65807-4 CZA-2 _ Aqueous 10/9103 13:15 EPA 60108 Pb Total Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Preserv-- QC Lot Prep Ship C382834 500 mL Plastic Proline BX8852 HNO3 R-3593D 09.15-03 n/a Lab ID Feld ID Matrix Sampled - Method !Notes 65807-5 MW-55 Aqueous 10/9103 12:05 MA DEP VPH with Target Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C283437 40 mL VOA Vial Fisher BX7661 HCI R-36458 06-02-03 06-09-03 C337337 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 MCI R-372_2E• 09-15-03 C337336 40 ml VOA Vidl Industrial BX9134 HCI - R-3722E 09-15-03 Iva Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 65807-6 Mw-5D Aqueous 10/9/03 12:30 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot _ Prep Ship C337349 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09 15-03 n/a C337348 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 n/a C337334 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 rua Lab ID Feld ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes b5807-7 MVV-65 Aqueous 10/9/03 13:00 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendor _ — -- QC'I of Precrry 'QC I nt Prep Ship CMUTA 4n ml VDA Vial Fisher BX7661 HCI R-3645B 0602-03 06-09-03 — C337335 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI K-37221: U9-15_13 n/a t337333 46 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 n/a Lab ID — Feld ID Matrix Sampled Medved Notes 65607-8 MIA'-617) ArluPnuc 10/9101 11:20 MA DFP VPH with Targarc Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship _ C337338 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 n/a C337351 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 n/a C337350 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial SX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 n/a Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYT/CAL Sample Receipt Report (Continued) Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 4'C Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Airbilk Na Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 65807 Lab Receipt: 10-10-03 Custody Seal(s): n/a Lab ID I Feld ID - - Matrix Sampled Method :Notes Y -- 65807-9 GZA-1(D) Aqueous 10/9/03 15:00 MA DEP VPH Carton Ranges Only Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C337352 40 mL VOA Vial industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 Na C337340 4U mL VOA Vial Industrial SX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-13-03 Na 037331 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX913a HCI R-3722E 1 09-15-03 Na Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled Method _- :Notes , 65807-10 GZA-2 Aqueous 10/9/03 13:45 MA DEP VPH with Targets Con ID Container Vendnr QC Lnt Presery QC Lot Prep Ship 1733733q 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI _ R-3722E 09-15-03 Na C337332 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 Na C337320 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15.03 Na_ Lab ID Field 1D Matrix i Sampled Method Notes 65R07-11 GZA-3 Aqueous 1019J03 14:10 MA DEP VPH Carbon Ranges Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C337295 40 mL VOA Vial industrial RX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 Na 7337308 40 ml.VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 Na C3377% .40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX9134 HCI R-3722E 09-15-03 n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled i 'Method .Notes 65B07-12 MW-SS Aqueous 10/9/03 12:(15 MA DFP FPH with PAHs by 8270C-Mnd SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC lot Presery QC Lot - Prep Ship C336698 1 LAmberGlass Greenwood BX9478 H2504 R-3779C 09-23-03 -_Na - - 7=366 77 1 L AmberClass •Greenwood BX9478 H2SO4 R-3779C 09.23-03 Na Lab ID Feld ID - Matrix Sampled Method - -- Notes 65807-13 MW SD Aqueous 10!9J03 12:30 MA DEP EPH with PAHs by 8270C-Mod SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship - _- C336696 1 LAmberGlass Greenwood BX9478 1-12504 R-3779C 092303 n/a _ C336692 1 LAmberGlass Grccnwood BX9478 H2SO4 R-3779C 09-23-03 n/a L Lab-0 Field 1D Matrix Sampled ! Methnd (Notes 65807-14 MW-65 Aqueous 10/9103 13:00 MA DEP EPH with PAHs by 8270C-Mod SIM - Con ID Container Vendur QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship _ C399866 1 LAmberGlass Greenwood BX9579 1-12504 R-3779C 10-01-03 n/a C336693 1 LAmberGlass Greenwood- 8X9478 1 QSO4 'R-3779C 09-23-03 n/a Lib ID I Field 1D Matrix Sampled I Method 1 Notes 6580715 MVy-6D Aqueous 10/9/03 13:20,MA DEP EPH with PAHs by 8270C-Mod SIM Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C399862 1 LAmberGlass Greenwood BX9579 H2504 R-3779C 10.01-03 Na C399858 I LAmberGlass Greenwood BX9579 H2SO4 R-3779C . 10-01-03 Lab ID ; Field ID Matrix Sampled i Method 'Notes 6SSi37-16 GLA-101 Aqueous 10/9/03 15:00 AMA DEP EPH Carbon Ranges Only Con ID _ Container Vendor QC I.o_t Precery QC Lnt Prep Ship-- C399868 1 LAmberGlass C.rpnnwnnri BXg57q H2SO4 R-3779C 10-01-M Na C3998r,4 1 I AmhPrGlass Greenwood BX9379 HZSU4 K-3779C 7U-01-03 Na Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 I GROUNDWATER , ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report (Continued) Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./9002-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 41C Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Airbill: nla Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 65807 1 ah Receipt: 10-10-03 Custody Seal(s): n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix i Sampled Method — ;Notes —_ 65807-17 L;LA-2 Aqueous 10/9t03 13:45 MA DEP EPH with PAHS by 8270C-Mod SIM — Con ID Container Vendnr QC Lot Pre%ery QC Lot Prep Ship C34191467 1 L Amber Glass Greenwood SX9579 FQSO4 R-3779C 10-01-03 n/a C399863 1 LAmberGlass Greenwood BX9579 H2SO4 K-3779C 10-01-03 n/a Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled'' Method ,Notes 65807-18! G7A-3 Aqueous 1019103 14:10 MA DEP EPH Carbon Ranges Only Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship -- i'' C399860 1 LAmberGlass Greenwood BX9579 H2SO4 R.3779C 10-014)3 n/a Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Data Certification Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Lab ID: 65807 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Received: 10-10-03 15.50 MA DEP Compendium of Analytical Methods Project Location: nla MA DEP RTN: n/a This Form provides certifications for the following data set: MA DEP VPH: 65807-05,-06,-07,-08,-09,-10,-11 MA DEP EPH: 65807-12,-13,-14,-15,-16,-1 7,-18 EPA 6010B: 65807-01,-02,-03,-04 Sample Matrices: Groundwater (Xl Soil/Sediment ( ) Drinking Water ( ) Other ( ) MCP SW-946 8260B ( ) 8151A ( ) _8330 ( ) 6010B (X) 7470A/1A ( ) Methods Used 8270C ( ) 8081A ( ) VPH (X) 6020 ( ) 9012A' ( ) - As specilied in MA DEP 8082 ( ) 8021 E ( ) EPH (X) 7000 S3 ( ) Other ( ) CnmMrdium of Anaklical _t. List Release Tr--J iug Number(RTN),'it known. -• __—__—_ - . Methods — '2. Swd46 MeiFwd 4072n(Equivalent to 9014)or nnn DEP Phystologimlly nvallable Cyanide(PAC)Method _ (check all that apply) :3.5-SW846 Methods 7000 Series. List.irufivicual nlerhod and aname. An affirmative response to questions A, 8,C and D is required for"Presumptive Certainty"status. A. Were all samples received by the laboratory in a condition consistent with that descrilled un the.Chain-of-Custody documentation for the data set? Yes S. Were all QA/QC procedures required for the specified analytical method(s) included in this report followed, including the requirement to note and discuss in a narrative QC data that did not meet appropriate performance standards or guidelines? Yes C. Does the analytical data included in this report meet all the requirements for"Presumptive Certainty,"as described in Section 2.0 of the MA DEP documPni CAM VII A, Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Repurting of Analytical Data? No D. VPH and EPH methods only: Was the VPH or EPH method run without significant modifications,as specified in Section 11.3? Yes A response to questions E and F below is required fur"Presumptive Certainly"StaluS. E. Were all QC performance standards and rerommPndationc for the. specified methods.achieved? Yes F. Were results for al l analyze list compounds/elements for the specified method(s)reported? No All No answers are addressed in the attached Project Narrative. I,the undersigned,attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that,based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for obtaining the information,the material contained in this analytical report is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,accurate and complete. signature: L V� rui Position: President Printed Name: Jonathan R. Sanford Date: 10-27-03 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GRQUNGWATER ANALYTICAL Trace Metals Field ID: MW-5S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brook;Rd./8002-3490 Container. 500 mL Plastic Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. . Preservation: HNO3/Cool Laboratory ID: 65607-01 Preserved: 10-09-03 12:05 Sampled: 10-08-03 12:05 Received: 10-10-03 155 0 Analysis Method OC Batch ID Prep Method Preparpd Samole Volume Instrument Irk Analyst EPA 60106' MM-1770-W EPA 3015 10.15-03 10:30 50 mL Icp.2 Pi»00 NAWR CAS Number Analyze __ Concentration mots; Units au�g Limit DF Analyzed Method 7439-92-1 Lead,Total 0.008 mg/L 0.006 1 10-24-03 10:52 EM 6010B' Method Reference: Test MPthnds for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846.Third Edition,Update III(1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is beluw tevjitiuig limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. DF Dilution Factor. 'tic .. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Bil77ards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Trace Metals Field ID: MW-6S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd.10002-3490 Container. 500 mt.Plastic Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Preservatiun: HNO3/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-02 Preserved: 10-09-03 10:00 Sampled: 10-09-03 10:00 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Analytic Method OC Batch ID Prep Method Prepared Sample Volume instrument ID An I s EPA 60109' MM-1770-W EPA 301.5 10-15-03 10:30 50 mL ICP-2 Pc 3300 MWP I _CAS Number Analyte I Concentration Note Units DIF ; ..Analyzed Method 7439-92-1 Lead,Total BRL mg/L 0.006 1 ID-24-03 1u:!)7 EPA 6010B' Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid waste,US EPA,SW-846.Third Edition,Update III it 996). Repurt Nutatipns: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit fur analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits arc adjusted for sample size and dilution. DF Dilution Factor. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200,228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Trace Metals Field 1D: MW-6101 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 500 mL Plastic Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HNO3/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-03 Preserved: 10-09-03 13:20 Sa m p I cd: 10-09-03 13:20 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Analysis Method OC Batch ID Prep Method Prepared gamole volume Instrument ID Analyst EPA 6010B' MM-1770-\N EPA 3015 10.15d3 10:30 50 ml. ler.2 n esuu MWR CAS Number Analyte _ Concentration Notesi Units Reponingunit- DF `. Analyzed Method 7439-92-1 Lead,Total BRL m 0.006 1 10-24-03 11:03 EPA60109' Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laWcatuly operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilutiun. DF Dilution Factor, Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Trace Metals Field ID: GZA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 500 m1 Plastic Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Preservation: HNO3/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-04 Preserved. 10-09-03.13:45 Sa m p l cd: 10.0 9-03 13:45 Received: 10-10-03 7 S:50 &aeX 5 Method oc Batch ID Prpo Method P r Sarno Volume Instrument III Analvs EPA 6010B' MM-1770AV EPA 3015 10.15-03 10:30 50 mL iCP.:PF 330D MWR —_ I CAS Number Analyze Concentration.. Notes... .. Units ,wgoRh�t;m;tr DF J. . Analyzed. Met}tod 7.439-92-1 Lead,Total BRL mWL 0.006 t �o-za o3 t 1:08 EPA 601 ` Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III 0 996). Report Notations: BRL. Indicates concentrdtiurt,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. DF Dilution Factor. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P-O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PID/FID Field ID: MW-5s Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./8002-3490 Container. 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCl/Cool Laburatory ID: 65807-05 QC Batch ID: VG1-1818-W Sampled: 10-09-03 12:05 Instrument ID: GC-1 HP 5890 Kereived: 10.10-03 15:50 Sample Volume: 5 ml Analyzed` 10-23-03 13:55 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: PO VP_H Ranges Concentration _ Notes Units i Reporting L-rmit n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ° _ _. _ BKI ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons'® BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' - BRL ug/L 20 Unadjusted n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons` BRL ug/L 20 Unadjusted n{9 to n C12 AIi phatic Hydrocarbons BRL uWL 20 CAS Number Analyte Concentration - Notes Units Reporting limit - ...._..----- 1634-04-4 Methyl tent-butyl Ether BRL ug/L 5' __._._. -.. 71-43-2 Benzene - BRL ug/L 1 108-88-3 Toluene' BRL ug/L 5 — BRL uWL 5 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene uro-36-a and lue-al-a meta-XYlene and Para-Xylene BRL ug/L S 95-47-6 ortho- Xylene' BKI ug/L 5 _ 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL u L 5 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked :Measured; Recovery - QC Limits _2,5-Dibrumutoluene(PID) 100 109 109 k _ ^ 70-130 % _ 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 110 109 % _— 70-130 -- QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the tequittd QA/QC procedutes achieved? yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? vo Mprhnd nnn{nnfrinmanres indirated ahnve are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data lepun. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limh is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. (D n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the i�C9 to n-CIC Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. = Analyze elutes in the n-05 to rrC8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. x Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNOWATIER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PI D/FI D Field ID: MW-5101 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 40 ml.VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Preservatiun: HCl/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-06 QC Batch ID: VG1-1818-W Sampled: 10-09-03 12:30 Instrument ID: C..C-1 HP 5890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 10-23-03 22:37 Dilution Factor. 5 Analyst: PO _ �" Concentration Notes Units ttcyartb.g timrt ,_VPH Ranges _ �_.. _..� :. n-CS to n-CR Aliphatic Hydrocarbons f° BRL ugIL 100 n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons'® BRL _ ug/L 100 n-C9 to n-Cl0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 100 m _ nad n-CS.to n-CS Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 100 _Unadjusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic ti dY rota bons BRL ug/L 100 — CAS Number Analyte Concentration Notes Units Reporting tirrkh 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-but IY Ether- BRL ug/L 25 71-43-2 Benzene' BRL ug/L 5 BRL 2 108-88 3 L Toluene' u 5 100-41-4 Ethyl benzene' BRL ug/L 25 10e-763 and 106.42-3 meta-Xvletle and Para-X le1 ne: .. BRL ug/L 25 95-47-6 ortho Xvlene` BRL ug/L 25 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 25 — QCSurrogate Compound Spiked iMeasuredl Recovery r QC Limits 2,5-2jbromotoluene(PID) 100 99 99 % 70- 130 ro _ ro 2,5-Dibromotuluene(FID) 70- 130 100 97 47 % — �. QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QAIQ(.procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifirations made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project qualir\, control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover lever. The acrmmpanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: methud for the Determination of volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit tnr analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration drat tail be reliably quantified tinder routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. I lydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/nr internal standards eluring in that range. n-CS to n•C8 Aliphatic Hydrtx:arbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic.Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte t:urtcentiations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-Cl0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-CR Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. + Analyte elutes in'the n-C9 to n-C12.Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PID/FID Field ID: MW-6S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./6002-3490 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: HCl/Cool Laboratory ICY: 65807-07 QC Batch ID: VG1-1818-W Sampled: 10-09-03 13:00 Instrument ID: GC-1 HP,5H9n Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sample Volume: S mL Analyzed: 10-23-03 16:33 Dilution Factor. 5 Analyst: PO VPH Ranges �— Concentration Notes Units Reportinc uTrat i n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons'0 BRL ug/L- 100 _ n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons+e BRL ug/L 100 n-C9 to n-Cl0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' 130 ug/L 100 Unaliusted n-C9 to n-C12 Alp uiphatic Hydrocarbons' 180 ug/L 100 nadiusted n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ' BRL _ L 100 CAS Number Analyte I Concentrations Notes Units Reyoningt;roa 1634-04-_4 Methyl tert-butyl Ether' BRL ug/L 25 71-43-2 Benzene' - BRL ug/L 5 _ 1.08-88-3 Toluene' _ BRL ug/L 25 16 1-4 Ethylbenzene` BRL ug/L 25 10&363 and 106.42.3 rrreld-Xylene and Para-Xylene' _-, 35 ug/L 25 95-47-6 ortho- Xylene' _ 36 ug/L 25 91-20-3 -Naphthalene BRL ug/L 25 _ QC Surrogate Compound .Spiked '•Measuredl Recovery T_ QC Limits 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 104 104 % 70-130 % 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 97 97 b 70-130 % QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the nledlud fulluwed? Yes 2. were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. were any signitiram modifications made to the method,as specked in Section 11.3.2.1? No method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the arcompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authuiized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrativo and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference. Method fat the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons.MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRI- Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit inT dndlyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size dltd dilution. t I hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 r1 C5 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data exr.htdx the method target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. = Analyte elutes in the n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. S Andlyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. _ Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 - ' LYTIC GI?OUN LTER . ANA Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PID/FID Ficld ID: MW-6D Matrix: Aqueous Container. 40 mL VOA Vial Project: Hubbard-Oil/Brooks Rd./8002-3490 preservation:. HCl/Cool Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Laboratory ID: 65807-08 QC Batch ID: VG1-1818-W Sampled: 10-09-03 13:20 Instrument ID: GC-1 HP 5890 Received: 10.1"3 15:50 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 10-23-03 15:12 Dilution Factor:. 1 Analyst: PO _-- —_ --~— Concentration Notes UnitsReporting Urnit r VPH Ranges ug/L 20 n n-CS to -C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarhnns ° _. _.—. BRL— ——. — 1gtl 20' n-C9 to n-Cl2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons °._.— —.— DRL uj;/L — 20 . n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. —.— — — _ u � 20 nadjusted n-05 to n-CB Aliphatic Hydrocart>dns -- —.—.. BRL— — —. >�— 2 _ I In n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic I I•drocerbons t BRL __ ug/L 0 — _ adiust� � a --.—_—_——.-- _ — -- Concentration Notes Untts Reporting t;nirt CAS Number Analyte—_ — 1634 04-4 Methyl tent-butyl—Ether' —.— — — BRL— 5 _ — 71�3 2 Benzene _ —. — — — DRL — — 1 08 88 3 Toluene —BRL - 100->.1-jl_ Ethvlbe BRL nzene` _ _ _ —. _ _ BRL ��� 10a3&33r Xyl ,d106-42-3 meta- para- ene' — .— —— — —.— —5 95-47-6 orrho- x Ipne° _ — — BRL — ug1L 5 .—..— —. .— BRL— - - Recov QC Limits QC-Surrogate Compound — — Spiked !Measured 70-130 % 2,5-Dibromotoluene,5- (PID) 100 108 _108 %— — 2Dibromntoluene(FID) — —.—. 100 10S 105 °/e 70-130 k� _ ——— — — —QVQC Certification — _ - Yes 1. Were all QA/QC Procedures requited by the method followed? Yes 2. were all perfurntance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? No 3. Were arty significant modifications made to rho method,as specified in 5ection 11.3.2.1? Method nor>conformanres indicated above are detailed below un this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality rnntrol report. Kelease of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,projen narrative and qualiny contrul report are considered part of this data report_ —— —— — —— .— — — Method Reference: Method for the Detemrination of volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DFP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is tare lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under rorrtinp laboratony-operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution i Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any sunngate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-LB Aliphatic Hydrocarbunb range data excludes the method target analyze concentrations. ® n C9 to n-C12.Aliphatic Hydrnrarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the cnnrenfration for the n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. t Analyte elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., Q.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJPID/FID Field ID: GZA-1(D) Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./B002-3490 Container. 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Presetvalion: HCl/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-09 QC Batch ID: VG1-181&-W Sampled: 10-09-03 15:00 Instrument ID: GC-1 HP 5890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sample Volume: 5 ml Analyzed: 10-23-03 17:14 Dilution Factor. 1 ,Analyst: PO VPH Ranges Concentration Notes units Reporting Limit n-05 to n-C8.Aliphatic Hydrocarbons I` _ BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 20 _n C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L'- 20 Unadjusted rrC5 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarl>ons` BRL ug/L 20 Unadjusted n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 20 QC Surrogate Compound _ Spiked_ !Measured Recovery QC Limits 3,5-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 103 103 % 70-130% 25-Dibromotoluene(FID) 100 101 101 /. 70-130 QA/QC Certification. _ 1. Were all QAIQC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 'a 2. Were all performancelaccepunce standards for the squired QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. were ally significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 1 1.3.2.1? :gin method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report.Ur in the dccumpanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part nl chic tiara report Method Reference: method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below,reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lov.est concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions:Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydtu[drtxms range datd excludes the method target analyte concentrations. co n-C9 to n-02 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the mnrhnrf target analyte concentrations and Lilt concentration for the n-C9 to n-CI0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. z Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-CR Aliphatic. Hydrocarbons range. i Analyle elutes in the n C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range.. - Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PID/FID Field ID: GZA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./9002-3490 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc.. Preservation: HCl/Cool Laburaloiy ID: 65807-10 QC Batch I11: VG1-1818-w Sampled: 10-09-03 13:45 Instrument ID: GC-1 HP 5890 . Received: 1(1-10-03 15:50 Sample Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 10-23-03 17:54 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: PO VPH Ranges Concentration Notes Units ReportfnS Limit n-CS to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrnmtons'° BRL ug/L 20 n C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons'$ BRL ug/L 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons'_ BRL ug/L 20 lU adiusted n-05 to n-E Aliphatic Hydrocarbons _.. BRL ug/L 20 U u5 d n7C9 Lo n{12 Aliphatic I lydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 20 CAS Number Analyte Concentration Notes Units Aepnrting Limit 1634-04-4 . Methyl ten-but ly Ether' . BRL ueJL -S 71-43-2 Benzene - BRtL ug/L 1 10888-3 Toluene BRI ug/L 5 100-41-4 Elllyibenzene BRL _ �P1L 5_ tub-s&j and toca2-3` meta-Xyleneand Para-Xylene` BRL ug/L 5 y5-1 orthr> X11ene_ uR/L 5 BRL 7-6 -, 91-�0 3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L o _ QC Surrogate Compound spiked red' - Recovery - QC Limits 25-Dibromotoluene(PID) 100 104 104 % 70-1 30% 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID) 10D 103 103 % 70-130% QA/QC Certification _ 1. were all QA/QC procedureb required by the method followed? Yes 2. were all perrormance/acceprance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. were any significant modifications made to the methnd,as specified in Section 11.3.2.1? No Mothnd non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,ut ill the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for The Detemtination of Volatile Petroleum I lydrocarbons,nnA DEP(1998). Report Nutaliuns: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the I(rwP.it rnncentranon that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory npprating conditions. Keporting limits are adjusted for sample size and d ilutiun. Y Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogatels)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-05 to n-C6 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the merhod target analyte concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-Cl 2.aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-C1G Aromatic Hvdrocarbons range. Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8.aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Analyte elutes in the❑-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic I lydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP VPH Method Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/PID/FID Field ID: GZA-3 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container. 40 mil.VOA Vial Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Preservation: HCl/Cool Labordtory ID: 65807-11 QC Batch ID: VG1-1818-W Sampled: 10-09-03 14:10 Instrument ID: GC-1 HP 5890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sample.Volume: 5 mL Analyzed: 10-23-03 18:35 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: PO _ i !�—Concentration __Notes Units R1ns Lima VPH Rang n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic..Hydrocarbons-0 —.—. BRL—.--. ug/L 20 ug/L 20 _ n_C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons+®— — BRL —— ugll 1 20 n-C9 to n-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons --- ri d'us n�5 to n CB AI i hatic H drocarbons r — — —. BRL— ug/L 20 — . .—_�L. _ BRL ug/L 20 nadiaatd n-C9_to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons --. — —. -- _ -Rec.-very QC Limit �5 it ed MdaureQCSurrogateCompound 102 °� _ 70 130 % 2,5-Dibromot0luen=(PID) 100 102 2,5-Dibromotoluene(FIU) 100 101 101 °'° _. 70- 130% - - QA/QC Certification — Yes 1. Were all QA/Qc procedures required by the methud followed? 2. Were all performancelacceptaiice standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes no 3. Were any significant modificafions made to the method,as sporified in Section 1 L3.2.1 Method non conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,ui in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report- Release of this data is authorized by the dLcutupanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and duality control report are consideied part of this data report_ — Method Reference-. Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(19991. Report Notations. 13XL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyie. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating r'rinditions. Reporting limits are adjusted fur sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 r-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrorarbons range data excludes the itiethod target analyse concentrations. ® n-C9 to n-Ct 2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze concentrations and the concentration for the n-C9 to n-CIO Aromatic Hydrocarbons range. a Analyte elutes in the n-05 to n-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range s Analyze elutes in the n-C9 to n-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons range. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Ektractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-5S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Huhhard Oil/Brooks Rd./9002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Class Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Prescrvation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-12 QC Batch ID: EP-1280-F ' Sampled: 10-09-03 12:05 Instrument ID: GC-9 Agilent 6890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 10-21-03 14:00 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 10-24-03 00:52 Aliphatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 10-2443 01:36 Aromatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: AG EPH Ranges Concentration Notes Units Reporting tfndt n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons} BRL ug/1 500 n-C19 to n-C36_Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/1 50o n-Cl1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 0 BRL ug/L 160 Unadjusted n-Cl 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL uWL 160 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked !Meawrec Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluo_mbiphe.nyl 40 36 90 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 22 55 % 40-140°h _ Extraction: Chloro-octadecane - 40 32 80 % 40-140%W ortho-Terphenyl 40 37 92-% 40-140% -- QA/QC Certification _--.-•--. 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? _ Yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as spentied in Sxtion 11.1? No melliud tturiconfumtances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The dcuurnpanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrucdrbuns,MA DEP(19981. Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: RRI Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits arc arljimM for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or intemal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C1 I to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range ddta excludes the method target analyze concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GRQUIVDWAT�R • ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field 1D: MW-5s Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJ5002-3490 Container: I L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O y 'Reill Inc. Preservation: F12SO4/Cool r - Laboratory ID: 65807-12 QC Batch ID: EP-1280•F Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Sampled: 10-09-03 12:05 Sample volume: 1,000 mL Rer.Dived: 10-10-03 15:50 Extracted: 10-21-03 14:00 Final volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 10-23-03 16:56 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: JJT ——. — CAS Number ; .Analyte Concentration Notes ! Reporting�rm1 BRL ug/L 0.5 — _91-20-3 Naphthalene _.— — — BRL —— ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene _ —.—_ —.— --- u�l 0.5 208-96-8 —Acenaphthylene ——__,—— BRL —— — - - BRL _ugJL - 0.5 — 83-32-9 _Acenaphthene_ _ .—.—-- BRL —ug/L— 0.5_ 86-73-7 Fluorcne —.— —..—— — BRL ug/L 0.5 _ 85-01-8 Phenanthrene — —. — BRl — ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene —.— — — — —ug/L 0.5 20fi•44 0 Fluoranthene— g/L 0.5 —.——_—. — BRL ——.—.— . BRL tI _ 129 00-0 Pyrene _ — — ._.. — — .— .—. BRL — .— — ug/L— 0.1 _56-55,-3 Benzo[a]anthracene —._ —— _BRL ug/L —_ 0.1 — 218-01-9 Chrysenc 205-99 2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene_ — — —.—_ BRL_ — ..— . ug/L - - BRL ug/L 0_1 — 207-08-9-9 _Benzork][luoranthene BRL _u�_— 0 1— 5432-8 BPnzo[alPYrene — —.•— — — -- .— 193 39.5 I ndeno[1,2,3-r.,dlpyrene ---- — BRL — _BRL ug/L 0.1 _53-7 0.3 Dibenzo[a,h[anthracene 191 24 2 Benzo[g,h,i]Perylene_ — —.—.— — . BRL_ ug/L 0.1 i Recovery QC Limits QC Surrogate Compound Spiked -Measured. ►y 40 34 85 % 40-140% — ortho-Terphenyl—_ — —. —.—. — — — — Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US CPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(19961. Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in aLwiJance with the MA DEP MPthnd for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum I lydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Mediod 3510C. Rnpnrt Notations: BRL IndiLdI&S concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentation that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GICIF1D Field ID: MW-5D Matrix: Aqueous Projen: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Conlainet: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2504/Cool Laboratory IIU: 65807-13 QC Batch IC1: EP-1280-F Sampled: 10-09-03 12:30 Instrument ID: GC-9 Agilent 6890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sampie Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: -10-21-03 14:00 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 10-24-03 02:20 Miplidtic Dilutiuu FdLiUI: 1 Analyzed(AR): 10-24-03 03.05 Aromatic Dnunon Factor: 1 Analyst: AG EPH Ranges Concentration Notes - Units _Reporting Limit . n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatir.Hydrornrbrins` BRL ug/L 500 n-Cl1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hvdrocarbons'° _BRL ug/L 160 r- Unadiustcd n_C71 to n C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons -_ BRL ug/L 160 QC Surrogate Compound _ Spiked ;Measured; Recovery _-,_.._.._. . . QC Limits -FtaUiundliun: 2-Fluoicibiphenyl 40 37 93 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 33 82 % 40-140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecana 40 39 47 % 40-140 _ _ . ortho-Terphenyl 40 41 102 % 40- 140 —_.._ QA/QC Certification 1. Were all Q VQC procedures required by the method followed? - Yec 2. were all performance/accepiance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Wwe dny significant mudifications made to the method,as specified in section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are derailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control re.porL Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered pan of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Sample rxtrartion performed by reparatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,Harty,Is below reporting limlt for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest cuncentrdtion that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target anaMe concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GUMS-SIM Field ID: MW-5D Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2504/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-13 QC Batch ID: EP-1280-F Sampled: 10-09-03 12:30 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 ml Extracted: 10-21-03 14:00 Final Volumc: 1 ml Analyzed: 10-23-03 17:34 Dilution Factor: 1'' Analyst: JIT CAS Number ' Analyze eonc6tration Notts Units Rpymorting L7mh 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphtfiylene BRL ug/L 0.5 _ 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL, ug/L 0.5 _ 86.73-7 Fluorene - —^ BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01.8 Phenanthrene RRL ug/L 0.5 _1_20-12-7 Anthracene BRL- ug/L 0.5 206-44-I1 I-luoranthene BRL ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pvrene ... BRL ug/L 0.5 56 55-3 Benzo[a)anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/I 0.1 205-99-2 Benzofblfluoranthene RRI ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k)fluoranthPne BRL _ ug/L 0.1 _ SO_i2-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL u&/L 0.1 193-30-5 lndeno[1,2,3-c,d)pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 53-70 3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24.2 Benzo[K,h,i)perylene BRL up/L 0.7 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked_ :Measured Recovery QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl 40 35 88 0, 40- 140 % Melhnd Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW 846,Third Edition,Update III(199G). Method modified by use of selertpd inn monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. MethW prulucul modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in arrordanrp with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petruleum Hvdrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,it any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 - i i GRDl1NDWAMR ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GtJFID Matrix: Aqueous Field ID: MW-65 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Prole.ct: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./6002 3490 preservation: H2SO4/Cool Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,inc. Laboratory ID: . 65807-14 QC Batch I GC-9 Agilent 6890 Sampled: 10-09-03 13.00 instrument D: GC-9 il Sample Volume: 1,000 ml Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Final Volume: 1 mL Extracted: 10-21-03 14:00 Aliphatic Uilucion Factor. 1 Analyzed(AL): 10-24-03 03:49 Aromatic Dilution Factor: 1 _ Analyzed(AR): 10.24-03 04,33 Analyst: AG -;_..fir rm fPH Ranges Coneentratton Notes Units I ltevos► RRI U91L 500 ' rt-C9 to n-0 H Aliphatic Hydrocarbun f _ug/L 500 _ n-C19 to n-C36 Al iphatir..Hydrocarbons=o .—, BRL ug/L 160 _ n C11 tc n=C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons --- -— BRL ug/L 160 — Unadiusted n C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons —— — Spiked :Measured;_: Recovery QC Limits QC Surrogate Compound P c 40-140°� Frarzionation: 2-Fluorobiphen�—.. 40— 3� — _43 D° — —---— 44-140% /° _ 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 _25 62 ——— — — 34 86 % 40-140 °b Ch _ r Extraction: — lort�orSadecane 40— 102 0� 40-140 k - ortho-Terphenyl — —40 41 ——.— ———— QA/QC Certification -- __ Yes 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all fwrtarmance/acceptance standards fut the required QPJQC procedures achieved? No 3. Were any.significant n,udirications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? Method non•conf6rances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality rn control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. 7hc accompanying cover letter,prnjPct narrative and quality control sport are considered part of this data report_ - - - - -. Method Reference: Method for the Determinarinn of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbuns,AtA DIt(t9981 Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Nntations: BRL Indicates cuncentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting Jim it is the lowest concentration tltat can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory or>P.rating conditions. Reporting limits are ddjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surcogatelsl and/or intPmal standards eluting in that range. 0 n Cl 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW6S Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./5002-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-14 QC Batch ID: EP-1280-F Sampled: 10-09-03 13:00 _. Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 sample Volume: 11000 mL Extracted: 10-21-03 14:00 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed: 10-2:"3 18:12 Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: )1T CAS Number Analyte Concentration Notes Units Reporting limit _1-2rI-3 Naphthalene 2.1 _ — _.— ug/L 0.5 9 _ 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene 1.2 —._ —, ug/L 0.5 _ 208 96 8 Acenaphthylene _ ——_ __. BRL0.5 BRL 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene —, ugfL Sfr73 7 Fluorenc BRL — —..— ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 _Phenanthrene — —_— —,— BRL — — .—u�. ._0.5 BRL ug/L P� -12-7 Anthracene i — ._ —. g/ 0.5 206-a4-0 FIuoranthene — —. BRL — — �L_ 0.5 . . 129-00 0 Pyrene .' '— BRL — .—..ug/L 0.5 — _5�55-3 Benzo[alanthracene —.— -- BRL 218 01-9 Chrysene _ — —,_BRL — — u8/L 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b)fluoranthene — — —. RRt.— ,. ug/L 0.1 _BRL - I"axG. :. . S/L 0.1 207-OR-y _ Benzo[kIfIuurdnthene == — 50-32-8 BPnzo[alpyrene_ — —.— —. BRL— ugh 0.1 _193-39-5 Indenol1,2,3-c,d)pyrene _ —— _ BRL ug/L 0.1 — 53-70-3 _BRL _ uS/L— 0.1 Dibenzo[a,h)anthracene 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,ilperylene — —. BRL —_ u L 0.1 _QC Surrogate Compound -- spiked IMeasured Recovery QC limits ortho-Te hen I 40 35 88 —— — — 40-140 N. Method Reference: TP%T Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,5xv-846,Third Edition,Update III(19961. Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method fnr the Determination of Extractable Petruleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA method 351 OC. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze Reporting limit is the lowest concentration rhat cdr,be reliably quantified under routine laboratory nperating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. i I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street,-Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCJFID Field ID: MW-6D Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-15 QC Batch ID: EP-1280-F Sampled: 10-09-03 13.20 .- instrument ID: GC-9 Agilent 6890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mt Extracted: 10-21-03 14.00 Final volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 10-24-03 05.17 Aliphalic nihninn Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 10.24-03 06:01 Aromalic Duulion Factor 1 Analyst: AG _EPH Ranges, _ _.__.. Concentration Notes Units Repodnatimit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons _- BRL_. ug/L 500 n C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarhnns f BRL ug/L 500 _ n C7 1 to n-C22 Arm oatic Hydrocarbons'° BRL lug/L. 160 Unadiusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons .. _ BRL.—. ug/L 160 QC Surrogate Compound Spiked :Measured Recovery- QC Limits Fraetinnation: 2-Fluorubiulzezzyl 40 39 97 % 40-140 b 1-Bmmonaphthalene_ 40 _31 _78 % —. 40- 140'!° — Extraction: _Chloro-octadecane 40 34 _85 % 40- 140 % ortho-Terphenyl 40 41 103 % _ ._ - 40- 140 °k - — QA/QC Certification - — 1. were all QA/QC procedures required by the mpthnd followed?- Yes 2. Were all performanrPlacceptance standards for the require)QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 1. Were any significant modlficatium made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method notKunformances indicated above are detailed below on this data repon,nr in the accompanying project narrdtive and project quality control report Release of this data is authorized by the arrnmpanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are rnnsidered part of this data report_ Method Reference: method for the Determination of Extmrtahle.Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Sample extracrinn performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notatinns: 13KL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the Inwvcr concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogatclsl and/or internal standards eluting in that range. o n-Cl 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydmrarbnns range data excludes the method tdrget analyze concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW-6D Matrix: Aqueous Project: Huhhard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Client: Sennett&O'Reilly, Inca Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laburatory ID: 65807-15 QC Batch ID: EP-1280-F Sampled: 10-09-03 13:20 Instrument ID: MS-6 HP 6890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sample Vnlume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 10.21-03 14:00 Final Volume: 1 mL 1a23-Oa 18.51 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyzed: _ Analyst: UT s. •` CAS Number Analyte Concentration — — Notes Units • Reporting Urnit 91-20-3 Naphthalene __ BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57 6 7.-Methylnaphthaiene — — BRL_ ttgll. 0.5 20B-96-8 Acenaphthylene —_ — —,.— .— BRL — — —.uglL 0.5 _ _83-]2 9 Acenaphthen_a BRL _ ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene _ — .— _BRL ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene _HRL —. ug/L.— 0.5 120 11-7 _ Anthracene BRL— _ _. ug/L 0.5 - - 2064�0 _Hunranthene_ — _ BRL — _. — ttg/L 0.5 _ 120-00 0 Pyrene — — .— —BRL !L% _ 0. 5cr55-3 Ber zo[a)anthracene _BRL ug/L— 0.11 .. _218-01-9 Chrysene — — .-- — —. BRL— — .—. 0.1 705-99-2_ _Benzo[b)fluoranthene _ — — — BRI — _ ug/L— 0.1 _ 207-08-9 _ Benzo[k)fluorandiene BRL_ ug/L 0.1 — _50.32-8 Reron[a)pyrene —_ .— BRL 0.I 193-39 5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,dJpyrane .— BRL ugfL 0.1 53-70.3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL — ._ ugfL 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,ijperylene— .—. .—_BRL 0.1 C Surrogate Compound _ _ Spiked Measured: Q Recovery — _. QC Limits _ ortho-Terphenyl —40 —34 —84 % — .— -4.0-140 l— — Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-1346,Third Edition,Update III(19W. Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Swoon 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sampip extraction performed by EPA Method 3510C. Report Notations: BRL Indicates cuncentation,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze. Rernning limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. keporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02332 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GCIFID Field ID: GZAA(D) Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./B002-3490 Container. . 1 L Amber Glass Client: Sennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-16 QC Batch ID: EP-1280•F Sampled: 10-09-03 15:00 InstrumentlD: .-GC-9Agilent6890 Received: 10-10.03 15:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 1G-21-03 14:00 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 10-24-03 07:30 Aliphatic Dilution Factor. 1 Analyzed(AR): 10-24-03 08:14 Arnmatir.nilutinnFactor. 1 Analyst: AG EPH Ranges i Concentration Notes Units Reporting Urnit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ' BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n{11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t° BRL ug/L 160 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydruc:drbuns' BRL ug/L 160 ^ QC Surrogate Compound Spiked ;Measured; Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 35 88 % 40- 140 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 34 85 % _ 40-140 . Extraction. Chloro-octadecane 40 _ 38 95 % _ 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 40 38 96 % 40-140% QA/QC Certification —. 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? f'es 3. Were any significant modifications mad-to the methnd,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are derailed below on rhis data report,or in the accompanying prujeet riandtive and project quality control reWrt. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report arc considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons.MA DCP(1998). Sample extraction performed by sepwatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze Reporting limit is the Inwgct rnncentratinn that ran be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. f Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogatels)and/or internal standards eluring in that range. 0 n-C11 to it-C22 Atumatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards.Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: GZA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Cl lent: Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservatiun: H2SO4/Cool Laboratory ID: 65807-17 QC Batch ID: EP-1280-F Sampled- 10-09-03 13:45 Instrument IU: GC-9 Agilent 6890 Received: 10-10-03 1550 Sample Volume: 1,000 ml Extracted: 10.21-03 14:00 Final Volume: l mL Analyzed(AU: 10-24-03 08S8 Aliphatic Dilution factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 10-24-03 04.42 Aromatic DilutitmFactur 1 Analyst: AG EPH Ranges Concentration. Notes Units Rep-ling n-C9 to n-C-18 atic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L_ i 500 Aliph n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL, ug/L 500 n-Cl1 ton-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons r° BRL ug/L 160 Un d"us n-Cl l to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 1 60 QC Surrogate Compound + Spiked :Measured`:. Recovery QC,Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 40 37 93 % 40- 140°! 2-13romonnphthalene 40 36 89 /o ° 40-140°!o Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 40 36 91 % 40-140 q° ortho Terphenyl 40 Al 101 % 40.-140% - _ QA/QC Certification 1. Werc all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancelarrP.ptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achievedr Yes 3. were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method nuit-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considererl Part nt this data report Method Reference-. Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Sample extraction performed by separatnry funnel technique. Report Nntatinns: UKL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit fur dttdlyie. Repotting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. i Hydrnrarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal staruldidi eluting in that range. 0 n-C11 to n C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte ennrentrations. i Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C(Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field 1D: GZA-2 Matrix: Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd.l9002 3490 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Client: Bennett-&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation H'1504/Cool Laburdlory ID: 65807-17 QC Batch ID: EP-1280-F Sampled: 10-09-03 13:45 Instrument ID: MS-0 HP 6890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 10-21-03 14.00 Final Volume: 1 ml Analyzed: 10-23-03 16:17 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst: 117 CAS Number Analyse Concentration Notes .Units aepodit umil 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL_ ug/L 0.5 91-57 6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 _83-32-9 Acenaphthene �- BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 _ Fluorene _ BRL ug/L. - 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthrare.ne BRL ug/L _0.5 _ _2064 Fluoranthene_ BRL 4 0 urJl 0.5 129-00-0 _ Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 5(r55-3 Benzo[a]anthracenc BRL ug/L U.1 218-01-9 Chrysene BRL ug/L 0.7 _.... 205-99-2 ene . Benzo[b]fluoranth BRL ug/L 0.1 _ _ _ _ . 207-09-9 Be.n7n[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 193-39-5 1ndeno[1,2,3-c,d)pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 -- -53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo[g.h,ilperylene BRL. _ ug/L 0.1 QC Surrogate Compound I spiked :Measured Recovery_ _ QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl _ 40� 36 90 % 40-140% Method Reference: Test Methods for E,aluating Solid Waste,LK FPA,SW-846,Third Edition,Update III(1996). Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)In accordance with Section 7.55 of the method. Method protucul tnudiried to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance_ with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Sample extraction performed by EPA methruf 1510C. Report Notatinnc: BRL Indicates concentration.if any,Is below reporting limit for analyte. Repunhig limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and dilution. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, BL1Z7.ardS Bay;MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL - Massachusetts DEP EPH'Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: GZA-3 Matrix: -Aqueous Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks RdJB002-3490 Container. 1 L Amber Glass Cl ient: Sennett&O'Reilly,Inc. Preservation: H2SO4/C.nnl Laboratory ID: 65807-18 QC Batch ID: EP-1280-F Sampled. 10-09-03 14:10 Instrument ID: CC-9 Agilcnt 6890 Received: 10-10-03 15:50 Sample Volume: 1,000 mL Extracted: 10-21-03 14:00 Final Volume: 1 mL Analyzed(AL): 10-24-03 10:27 Aliphatic Udurion Factor: 1 Analyzed(AR): 10-24-03 11:11 Aromatic Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: AC EPH Ranges -Concentration Notes Units Reporting ti.nrt n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons _ BRL ug(L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons` BRL ug/L Soo _ _.. ri-Cl 7 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t o BRL ug/L 7 60 Unadjusted n-Cl t to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L - 160 QC Surrogate Compound - i Spiked Meawtrdi. Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl aU 40 100 % 40-140°!° 2-Bromonaptithalene 40 34 85 % - 40-_1 40% [xtraction: Chloro-octadecanc 40 34 86 % 40-140% —_ ortho-Terphenyl 40 43 107 % 40-140°! QA/QC Certification _ 1.-were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? yes 2. \�'erc all perform ance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modfrarinnc made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are derailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control repurt. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report arc considered part&this data report. Method Reference: Method fur the Determination of Extractable Petroleum I lydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Sample extraction performed by separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analytr. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted fur sarriple size and dilution. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards oluling in that range. o rt-Cl 1 to o-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O- Box 1200, 228 Main Street, 111,177ardq Say, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Project Narrative Project: Hubbard Oil/Brooks Rd./BO02-3490 Lab I D: 65807 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: .10-10-03 15:50 A. Documentation and Client Communication The following documentation discrepancies,and client changes or amendments were noted for this project: 7 . No documentation discrepancies,changes,or amendments were noted. i B.Method Modifications, Non-Conformanees and Observations The sample(s)in This project were analyzed by the references analytical rr,ethod(s), and no method modifications, non-conformances or analytical issues were noted, except as indicated below: 1 EPA 6010E Non-conformance: Samples 65807-01,-02,-03,-04.A matrix spike (MS)sample was not performed in accordance with the minimum field QC:requirements of the MA DEP CAM. 2 . EPA 6010B Note: Samples 65807-01,-02,03,04.Samples were analyzed for selected target analytes, as requested by client. 3.. MA DEP EPH Note:Samples 65807-12,-13,-14;15,-17.Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)target analytes were identified and quantified by GUMS-SIM, in accordance with the method provision for alternate determinative methodologies.GUMS-SIM was used to achieve low quarrl.ificatiun limits necessary for regulatory compliance. Target analytes were determined utilizing the same sample extract used.for carbon range determination by GC/FID. 4 . MA DFP EPH Note:Samples 65807-16,-18. Samples were analyzed for only carbon range analytes,as requested by client. 5 . MA DEP VPH Note: Sample 65807-06,-07. Sample was diluted prior to analysis. Dilution was required due to observed foaming characteristics of sample. Sample foaming interfere with purge and trap sample concentration. 6. MA DEP VPH Note: Samples 65807-09,-1 1.Samples were analyzed for only carbon range analytes, as requested by client. i Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200,228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i I i I 226 i GRMNOWATER Buz andsn Slie st,P.O.Box 1209 M Sliest,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD 14fq 0750$6 ANALYTICAL Telephono(608)759-4441•FAX(eoe)759-4475 AND WORK ORDER www.gfoiindwaterafkalyllcal.com - PmjocIN e n: Firm TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST If �1sibP�tdnnl<rltub. AIL. 'll Q(• )1I S-AWARD(III Business Days) uwalue, swhdnW, ul a New OAae 7meul n.olu.•, Oho Proiecl Ngmber: AddlesS: 'I PRIORITY 1.5 Business Daysl E a a !1l,'.11 1 11 RUSF(RAN-.. t))- �,�}'0 �)3 /vltl'", Poi IL( ! i 11 t '� J>< INrnn rxFllree n.,h Amoualron Nm,n[r) I1 n ri 11 I1 11 } {) I Samplat Nanho: City!Stale/2111: I 1 Please Email to: C1�,3 ( -'IPleaseFAXio:� 4 F a BILLING ? IN ?# = 3 x } Project Maragcc Twephhrone: �.tp %I .t r " ii n n A ,1 'b • A o' .J - 1"�t�, ,.T(f bit,- �) 3() 14 Purchase :_.r Na F 1 Cl v r :. CI Third?arty Billing:—'- _- _-.--- 2 •a � � � INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container{except replEates). r) GwnQuote:, a x - 1It 1 1 — Matrixhpal cotalner(s)Sanpling � a 5 - , P b a u LABORATORY �. � p k SAMPLE NUMBER .S IDENTIFICATION : g• s d o @ a (Leh Uso Only) t'. a tD '�' R ti e i n •, a F Fyn - � k p S $ � � 799 5c �. 2 . NNh Se ar�r, i: a ,RI1s & �.r, � t_ re n # N r' i. 1 z �:- A111i r:1. 11 1. 1 11 .l rl it ll 1' .1'Il Li II II , n Li G I 1 II II it 11 i 1: I 3 I% X e• lot 12 JS I L � � �e z•3� W's I� S I:oe W' :S 3 % 1. x `.zv -ivi� 145 'Z -Z Z 3 n X i i REMARKS I SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Speclllc OC )5iirrp i submitted subject to Standard Terms and CondhiullS Oil t0vorso hrrnol. Slato Standard Del)vofab as Many'aguletcry programs and FDA methods require project mr 1 sa I / oat lone no,.elaa.4 l:y: ` n coipl rm11,J1114,IC ' specific OC.Piclecl specific OC includes Samplo Duplicates, I i '� 'tom, T-, f' �� '.c�.II�.y�u1.J 'i CT pOiMCPGW-1/S-1. :IPWSFvrm Matrix SpBtas,and/or Mabix SpikeDuplica:es.LzhonbryOCis I� �� 4•- r'1� ,1-tiC. OtffC( (Iddd`/ ,�u�ttrta.r.••.'^' r nM project specific unless prearranged Project spodliC OC 1„ nma Rocetvetlny: Ccnudun fuuu- 7ME fl1ACP GW-2/S-1 �..-_— R uxptiEll salplas aro charged on a pnr sarrlpla oasis.Each MS,MSD �AA I.l NY STARS ri_ and 9onhpla Dupllcale raqulfae an addlllonel sample ellquot. J itJ .• j ! .�. 11NH I IOinking Watw Onla Tirw R laJoralo;y: Sri ,int erall uiA,ed hy.. . ,-v •}hy q y n NY Ef Waste Rolinq water Project Spatlllo OC Required Selection of OC Sample I 1 1 N11rrl,ar: I RI U Wasln clsposal IJ Semple 0,pl c.1e U PWa,e me simple: C, F IVIF I I Oredgo Malaria 1-11,4311ix Spe.e Method at Shirrmnt I I GV P 1:mxiet i I Expl[se Mail t I 17eu0lal tr,goe, uSlady Se:1 IJ fI_ __ _ 11 Mahi.Spll.a Out,laito -- - �— _ J1 NurnhOC 'I IIPS r.I>,nrl I I BENNETT AT O'REILLY, Inc. Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street Sanitary 21FJSite Remediation Property Line ® PO Box 1667 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Brewster, MA 02631 Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Licensed Site Professional Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax B002-3490 August 14, 2003 Ms. Laura Stanley, Sites Management Section MA Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC) �� '' AR'a"D Southeast Regional Office (SERO) 20 Riverside Drive AUG 1 2.qn Lakeville, MA 02347 TOWN OF e:4_, E HEALTri t E - RE: PHASE IV REMEDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MODIFICATION Hubbard Oil Company Inc. - RTN 4-0824 33 and 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 14, Parcel 125 and1261 - Hyannis, M.A. 02601 Dear Ms. Stanley, Pursuant to our most recent conversation following the submittal of the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan(6/23/03),BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC., has communicated with the Town of Consultant's (Horsely & Whitten - Joe Longo) regarding the approved taking and the proposed re-development of the property under the Barnstable Airport expansion project. I have enclosed a copy of the conceptual design for the Intermodal Parking Lot that was forwarded to me with our Site Plan superimposed. You will see that this composite plan clearly shows that the proposed roadway goes through the existing buildings on the property and through treatment Zone A. The remaining portion of the Site appears to be unaffected by the redevelopment in that a secure fenced gravel parking area for containers and commercial vehicles is proposed. In communications with the Town's consultant, I have been advised that the final design is subject to change throughout the permitting process which is projected to take place over the next 16 to 24 months. Based on the current conceptual design, and the projected time frame for permitting and construction activities, it is the opinion of BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC., that the selected remedial alternative can be successfully implemented within the schedule outlined within the Phase IV Investigation with one exception. The roadway construction and placement ofunderground utilities within Zone A would damage the engineered barrier and infiltration system. Expenditures in this area for the construction of such appurtenances, ahead of the final design and determinations for utility placement would result in redundant costs and could adversely effect treatment capacity. 1 I I AUGUST 14,2003 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC/BROOKS RD.BO02-3490 PAGE 2 OF 2 MODIFICATION OF REMEDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN As such, we plan to delay the construction of infiltration system and engineered barrier in Zone A until which time that assurances can be made relative to restricting the depth of such disturbances and/or the re-routing of underground utilities away from this area;preferably on the western side of the planned roadway. The ORC injections along the downgradient property line, bio-venting in all areas and the removal of surficial soil contamination(0-3) and construction of an engineered barrier in other areas would be unaffected.The prescribed environmental monitoring program would remain unaltered. A copy of this communications is being provided to the Town of Barnstable counsel,Barbara Harris, and their consultant, Joe Longo, to make comments or to provide updated information on any changes to the conceptual design or re-development schedule. I am suggesting the any such communications be copied to you to keep you apprized of such events as they may impact the operation, maintenance and/or monitoring of the remedial system. All construction, inspection, maintenance and environmental monitoring with"as built"plans will be filed in the future Remedial Operation Status Reports to be filed on a six month basis. The first of these reports is due in December 2003. I have most recently met with the environmental contractor to confirm the scope of work and scheduling for Remedy Implementation to begin in the first week of October 2003. In the interim, quarterly groundwater sampling at the end of September will be conducted. Should you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact either of the undersigned directly at your earliest convenience. I Sincerely, B TT & 'REILLY, INC. P 1 � id . nnett, LSP Jo D. T de a- Ie t Director of nmental Services Prbject Manager encl. Composite Plan merging Hyannis Intermodal Transportation Center "Conceptual Layout Parking Area and Access Road" (7/03) by Edwards and Kelcey [Figure 4a] with Site Plan RIP-2 entitled "...Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan" (4/24/03) by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. cc. Hubbard Oil, Inc. - Attn: Evelyn Read, General Manager Attorney Robert Fasanella- RUBIN& RUDMAN, LLP John Klimm -Barnstable Town Manager c/o Attorney Barbara Harris Lieutenant Hubler -Hyannis Fire Department Thomas McKean -Barnstable Board of Health David Condry - Barnstable Water Company Joe Longo, Project Manager-Horsley& Whitten I BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. Engineering& Environmental Services LETTER OF . 1573 Main Street, P.O.Box 1667 Brewster,MA 02631 TRANSMITTAL (508) 896-6630 FAX(508) 896-4687 TO: DATE: JOB NUMBER: Ms.Laura Stanley/Mr.Gerard Martin 6/27/03 B002-3490 Massachusetts Dept.Environmental Protection(SERO) BWSC/SMP 20 Riverside Dr. REGARDING: Lakeville,MA 02347 Hubbard Oil Co,Inc. t 33 &51 Brooks Rd. We are sending you: Hyannis,MA Comprehensive Response Action Transmittal BWSC 108 Phase VI Remedy Implementation Plan Supporting Documentation-RTN#4-0824/4-15370 1 COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION t 1 6/23/03 Phase VI Comprehensive Response Actions Remedy Implementation Plan RTN#4-0824/4-15370 For review and comment: ❑ For approval: ® As requested:❑ For your use:❑ REMARKS: cc: Hubbard Oil,Inc.-Evelyn Read,Gen.Mgr. Atty.Robert Fasanella-Rubin&Rudman,LLP Lt.Hubler-Hyannis Fire Dept. Thomas McKean-Barnstable Board of Health John Klimm-Bamstable Town Manger,c/o Atty.Barbara Harris David Condry-Barnstable Water Company John Robichaud,Abutter-Robie's Refrigeration From: John Tadema-Wielandt-Environmental Scientist II/Project Manager If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once r - f AM AENNET T t 'REILLY Inc. Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line PO Box 1667 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision O Brewster,MA 02631 Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Licensed Site Professional Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax B002-3490 December 3, 2002 Ms. Laura Stanley, Compliance and Enforcement Branch Chief, SMP p Mr. Gerard Martin, Chief Sites Management& Permitting Section, BWSC Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office (SERO) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC)/Sites Management Program (SMP) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 RE: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA AS PART OF PHASE II COMPLETION REPORT Hubbard Oil Co. Inc. -- RTN 4-0824/4-15370 33 & 51 Brooks Road [Assessors Map 328, Parcel 125 & 126] Hyannis, MA. 02601 Dear Ms. Stanley and Mr. Martin, . The attached analytical data represents the remaining set of data associated with the Phase 11 Completion Statement for the above referenced property, submitted to the MA DEP on November 21, 2002. Historic research had formerly indicated EDB and lead in groundwater at the Hubbard property. In order to finther delineate the extent of groundwater impact as consistent with Phase II activities and the Implementation of the MA DEP EPH/VPH Approach Document(10/31/02),groundwater samples collected on November 14, 2002 from the two most downgradient monitoring well couplets [(RR)MW-5S,D and (RR)MW-6S,D] were analyzed for ethylene dibromide (EDB) and total lead. Results of the analysis,not available at the time of the filing,report no concentrations of either analyte above the laboratory reporting limits in any of the samples analyzed. These results are consistent with, and further support the findings of the Phase II fmdings,relative to the extent of significant groundwater impact being confined to a discrete area to the west of Yarmouth Road. As such,there is no critical ingestion expostire to the Maher Well field, inhalation exposures to occupied buildings, or environmental impact to the downgradient wetland as associated with the identified releases at the Hubbard Oil-Brooks Road Site at this time. 1 DECEMBER 3,2002 HUBBARD OIL CO.,INC.BO02-3490 PAGE 2 OF 2 PHASE II-SUPPLEMENTAL DATA Please incorporate this cover letter and analytical data as an addendum to the"Phase H Completion Report' prepared by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., dated November 18, 2002. This information has been copied to the local municipal authorities in accordance with public notification requirements. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact myself or John Tadema-Wielandt at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, BE TT & O'REILLY, INC. � 1 � Q) - D ne , LSP hn DT dema- ie dt Director onmental Services onvironmental Scientist II encl. - Groundwater Analytical data (11/25/02) cc. Hubbard Oil, Inc. - Attn: Evelyn Read, General Manager Attorney Robert Fasanella- RUBIN & RUDMAN, LLP Lieutenant Hubler -Hyannis Fire Department Thomas McKean- Barnstable Board of Health John Khmm - Barnstable Town Manager David Condry -Barnstable Water Company John Robichaud, Abutter- Robie's Refrigeration I RECE9E,E3 , zoo? Groundwater Analytical,Inc. GROUNDWATER P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL Buz Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 November 25, 2002 Mr.John Tadema-Wielandt Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 LABORATORY REPORT Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 Lab I D: 56251 Received: 11-05-02 Dear John: Enclosed are the analytical results for the above referenced project. The project was processed for Priority turnaround. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a sample receipt report detailing the samples received, a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a quality control report, and a statement of our state certitications. The analytical results contained in this report meet all applicable NELAC standards, except as may be specifically noted, or described in the project narrative. This report may only be used or reproduced in its entirety. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the intormation, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and beliet, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Eric H. Jensen Operati ins M ager EHJ/pcl _ Enclosures I GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Sample Receipt Report Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 Delivery: GWA Courier Temperature: 2.6'C Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Airbill: n/a Chain of Custody: Present Lab ID: 56251 Lab Receipt: 11-05-02 Custody Seal(s): n/a ^Lab ID"'*'r'.- :FieId:ID Matrix., Sampled'.' Method r - Notes . 56251-1 (RR)MW-5S Aqueous 11/4/02 15:30 IEPA 504.1 EDB and DBCP Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot Prep Ship C203993 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5470 HCl R-3173F 10-02-02 10-18-02 ,lab ID'] Fii 10D., Matrix Sampled. ' Method '' Notes 56251-2 (RR)MW-5D Aqueous 111/4/02 15:30 IEPA 504.1 EDB and DBCP Con ID Container Vendor QC Lot Presery j QC Lot Prep j Ship C203988 j 40 mL VOA Vial Industrial BX5470 HCI j R-3173F ' 10-02-02 j 10-18-02 -Lab,ID I -Field ID "Matrbe - "Sampled 'Method . 'fig': Notes—,' 56251-3 I (RR)MW-6S Aqueous 11/4/02 16:15 IEPA 504.1 EDB and DBCP Con ID j Container I Vendor I QC Lot Presery I QC Lot Prep Ship C203981 j 40 mL VOA Vial j Industrial j BX5470 j HCl j R-3173F 10-02-02 ! 10-18-02 j .Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled I Method Notes 562514 I (RR)MW-6D I Aqueous ! 11/4/02 16:45 JEPA 504.1 EDB and DBCP I j Con ID) Container j Vendor QC Lot j Presery j QC Lot _Prep_ I Ship C203984 40 mL VOA Vial j Industrial I BX5470 j HCl R-3173F 10-02-02 j 10-18-02 lab.ID Field ID Matrix Sampled I Method iNotes 56251.5 ! (RR)MW-5S Aqueous i 11/4/02 15:30 iEPA 6010E Pb Total j Con ID Container j Vendor QC Lot Presery QC Lot __Prep Ship C172592 ! 1 LAmberGlass j Proline I BX5371 H2SO4 _R•3421C 09-12-02 09-17-02 Lab ID Field-ID Matrix Sampled Method Notes 56251-6 i (RR)MW-5D j Aqueous ; 11/4/02 15:30:EPA 6010E Pb Total _— I Con ID j Container I Vendor i QC Lot Presery I QC Lot Prep j Ship I I C172588 I 1 L Amber Glass ! Proline ( BX5371 i H2SO4 j R-3421C j 09-12202 ! 09-17-02 Lab ID FieldJD Matr7--7 Sampled I Method Notes —� 56251-7 ! (RR)MW-6S j Aqueous 11/4/02 16:15!EPA 6010E Pb Total Con ID Container I Vendor QC Lot Presery j QC Lot Prep Ship _ : C137184 I 1 L Amber Glass I Proline j BX4505 H2SO4 , R-3353C , 08-08-02 j 08-16-02 j Lab ID Field ID Matrix Sampled I Method iNotes 56251-8 (RR)MW-6D I Aqueous 11/4/02 16:15!EPA 6010E Pb Total Con ID i Container I Vendor j QC Lot Presery j QC Lot Prep Ship ! _ C172594 j 1 L Amber Glass j Proline j BX5371 H2SO4 R-3421C j 09-12-02 09-17-02 I =. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 I GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 504.1 EDB and DBCP by GGECD Field ID: (RR)MW-5S Laboratory ID: 56251-01 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: PV-0609-E Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 11-04-02 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Received: 11-05-02 Preservation: HCI/Cool Extracted: 11-18-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 11-19-02 Dilution Factor: 1 CAS Number Analyte " 'Concentration' Units Reporting Limit 106-93-4 I1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) BRL ug/L I 0.02 96-12-8 I1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane(DBCP) BRL ug/L 0.02 Method Reference: Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water,Supplement III, US EPA,EPA-600/R-95/131 Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 504.1 EDB and DBCP by GC/ECD Field ID: (RR)MW-5D Laboratory ID: 56251-02 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: PV-0609-E Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 11-04-02 Container: 40 mt.VOA Vial Received: 11-05-02 Preservation: HCI/Cool Extracted: 11-18-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 11-19-02 Dilution Factor: 1 t AS.Number Analyte Concentration' Units Reporting Limit 106-934 I1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) I BRL I ug/L 0.02 96-12-8 I1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane(DBCP) I BRL ug/L 0.02 Method Reference: Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water,Supplement III, US EPA, EPA-600/R-95/131 Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. I Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 Y GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 504.1 EDB and DBCP by GGECD Field ID: (RR)MW-6S Laboratory ID: 56251-03• Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: PV-0609-E Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 11-04-02 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Received: 11-05-02 Preservation: HCI/Cool Extracted: 11-18-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 11-19-02 Dilution Factor: 1 -fir. .•^-aw.r•rrsyRr`u � S.-i:ire .i.:,. rat, 3 -rs t.ysa udaHt a-_4i+i c."' CAS Number �y �a i#rAnalyte »�; Concentration; v ,' �wUmts*r.A.- A epor6ng1imitt d+N•y.Tni+'•.�+�Y':=ib 106-93-4 I1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) I BRL ug/L I� 0.02 96-12-8 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane(DBCP) BRL ug/L I 0.02 Method Reference: Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water,Supplement III, US EPA,EPA-600/R-95/131 Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 504.1 EDB and DBCP by GGECD Field ID: (RR)MW-613 Laboratory ID: 56251-04 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 QC Batch ID: PV-0609-E Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 11-04-02 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Received: 11-05-02 Preservation: HCI/Cool Extracted: 11-18-02 Matrix: Aqueous, Analyzed: 11-20-02 Dilution Factor: 1 Y'rw:.+i4.r�Ytr'�}{ti .'F�'•n Y',sir ti Cr sr yIS ti.l..e�jd rnti cen4 �, se fir.. jf.,:•,r nc.a -" rTcE►y "''C:�: i CASNumberrt»� ;; x �1" �Analyte ; �T= ` ram; Contratio 4.cc.� n, . s., Umtssr` '-jReporting+Ltmtti �±?s�,._:-�r_ kcx...-.c.���:`Y_d.> x::...._� �.-„a....� ..,.. ,.��n .. .mac ...,_�_..n>~ ate. _,..c er...•.:, 10(r93 4 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) I BRL ug/L I s 0.02 96-12-8 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane(DBCP) BRL ug/L I 0.02 a I Method Reference: Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water,Supplement III, US EPA,EPA-600/R-95/131 Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. i i Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Trace Metals by ICP-AES Field ID: (RR)MW-5S Laboratory ID: 56251-05 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 Sampled: 11-04-02 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 11-05-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Preserved: 11-04-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Matrix: Aqueous ry, .t.� r% - "s'�Re Ortln " '7�i'S ".^�„ r4' _+r.9k.i�i:.$„4'C<i'�-•n x �yQ-,spr+,f a4, cASNumbec Anae '?t + Concent'atlon'J!Untts w;�mlt i`AnnalyzedlQCBatchMet4ho 7439-92-1 I Lead,Total BRL I mg/L 0.005 11-20-02 I MM-1670-W EPA 6010B Method Reterence: lest Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-84b, third Edition, Update III (199b). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration tnat can be reliably quantirled under routine laboratory operating conditions. Keporting limits are adjusted tor sample dilution and sample size. • i Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Trace Metals by ICP-AES Field ID: (RR)MW-5D Laboratory ID: 56251-06 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 Sampled: 11-04-02 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 11-05-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Preserved: 11-04-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Matrix: Aqueous Reporting CAS'Number Analyte Concentration ' Units ; Analyzed! QC Batch Method Limit 7439-92-1 Lead,Total BRL I mg/L 1 0.005 11-20-02 I MM-1670-W EPA 60106 Method Reterence: lest Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846, I hird Edition, Update III (1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantities under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. i Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Trace Metals by ICP-AES . Field ID: (RR)MW-6S Laboratory ID: 56251-07 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 Sampled: 11-04-02 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 11-05-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Preserved: 11-04-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Matrix: Aqueous a"r-i2i> trxL' i� 'A., �fy-�;tt*- s'�+.. °Fc it'a'��+ ,�f'at.�'t REpoftlrlg� { :a�'w.; f7`r,+2t � �t7X'kcr�.3� �-ffty ���. CAS1Number. nalyte`f Concentration; ,Units , Analyzed, QC Batch Method 'a�, T :skrflrz s.'h a't�z38a t ': 7439-92-1 1 Lead,Total BRL mg/L 1 0.005 11-20-02 I MM-1670-W EPA 60106 Method Keterence: lest Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-646, I hird Edition, Update III(1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Keporting limits are adjusted tor sample dilution and sample size. y Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Trace Metals by ICP-AES Field ID: (RR)MW-6D Laboratory ID: 56251-08 Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 Sampled: 11-04-02 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 11-05-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Preserved: 11-04-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Matrix: Aqueous CAS Number Analyte Concentration." Units Reporting Analyied QCBatch Method Limit 7439-92-1 I Lead,Total BRL mg/L I 0.005 1 11-20-02 MM-1670-W EPA 60106 Method Reterence: lest Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EVA,SW-84b, I hird Edition, Update III (1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantitieo under routine laboratory operating conoitions. Reporting limits are ao)ustea for sample onution and sample size. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 L__ GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Project Narrative Project: Hubbard Oil Co. Inc./BO02-3490 Lab ID: 56251 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 11-05-02 A:.'Physica'I Condition of>Sam pie(s) This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition, and the sample(s) were received undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation, except for the following non- conformance(s): 1. Samples 56251-05 through —08 for Total Lead analysis were received preserved with H2SO4. Samples were analyzed as received, per Dave Bennett, 11-18-02. B. Project Documentation This project was accompanied by satisfactory Chain of Custody documentation, with the following amendment(s) or correction(s): 1. Project 56251 was processed for Priority Turnaround due 11-25-02, per Dave Bennett, 11-18-02. 2. Samples 56251-01 through -04 were analyzed by EPA Method 504.1, per Dave Bennett, 11-18-02. 3. Samples 56251-05 through -08 were analyzed for Total Lead, per Dave Bennett, 11-18-02. 4. Samples 55812-01 through -08 were reassigned laboratory numbers 56251-01 through -08. C. Analysis of Sample(s) No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were noted by the laboratory during the processing of these sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 228 Main Street,P.O.Box 1200GROUNDWATER Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD NALYTlCAL Telephone ` (508)759-4441 Project Name: Firm: -4475 N AND WORK ORDER pp FAX(508)759 0 065104 TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST /r valatiles semlvalallles Pes erb Ces❑ STANDARD(10 Business Days) M.I.I. Peaole- dioaatban Haa. ' Project Number: Address: areala ol. GaneralChemiatry omar PRIORITY(5 Business Days) _ a E LlPIL of TPH waste ❑ RUSH(RAN- Sampler Name: (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number O A City/State/Zip: ) O ❑ O w 3 O O a Please FAX T)YES O NO 8 0 FAX Number: ?' '� m O Project Manager. Telephone: e 5 W 's c 1 'l BILLING 's = & a E s ��u��"��� ��) Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ° ❑ ❑ ° 3 = INSTRUCTIONS: 7 a g s it - UCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates). ����/L 5 ��(/ S g m m y �d s n - Sampling Matrix Type Container(s) 3 2 s a V o ❑ 2 S :� ❑ 33 Preservation Fill �iT -� o o ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o o -' S _ o � 4 0 o a 0 SAMPLE W IDENTIFICATION I S's o 5 u ------------- LANUMBERRY 8c — a. Zj F $ Q � '-' x c _ 5j js _ m (Lab Use Only) d m i 55 g AA y a ❑ oE -------------- i c g d$� = S "s_ S i E y.s s": _ $ m g s � _ - x .' s s ! s ❑ . o o �s, a 3 _ 2 ti ❑ o c ❑ a ❑ o o a - o 0 0 0 0 ❑ a ❑ s ❑ g a $o 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o 0 0 o a o 9S F� tl-�u1 3 Z t, ------------------- IFT REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specific OC O Sale Drinking Water Act NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Con itions on reverse hereof. Man regulatory programs and EPA methods require project e I y a r er• oat Time Received by: N DE DCf Form Y 9 Y p 9 q P ! �eceipt Tempe[a qu .,,,rspecilic OC.Project specilic OC includes Sample Duplicates, LLAA O Specify Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory OC is 1 Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC - dZ t(6 ^1v C ll l ,.� 'Z O RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples, lin i ed y: to Time Rec a by: hipping/Airbill MA MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS.MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional / Number: Reportable Concentrations sample aliquot. / 5/C�'2 'ARCGW-1-t RCS-1 Project Specific OC Required Selection of OC Sample Relip ui Date Time O RCGW-2 O RCS-2 I oratory !l) Custody Seal/ O Sample Duplicate 0 Selected bylaboratory 1 I e Cooler Serial O MA Dredge Disposal I►16,U �(I- , I ...:i O NH O RI O CT O ME O Matrix Spike p Please use sample: Number: Specify Category: O Matrix Spike Duplicate Method o t: O GWA Courier O Express Mail D ederal xpress 0 UPS 0 Hand 0 � GROUNDWATER NALY�ALTER Quality Assurance/Quality Control A. Program Overview Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) developed for each analytical method. SOPs are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GC/MS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing calibration standard. GUMS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. B. Definitions Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: EPA Method 504.1 QC Batch ID: PV-06094 Matrix: Aqueous .n� �6?,� t C45 Number, 1 � 'Analyte ,,,rt Concentration ,.,Units �+ ..`k'-'�.:sM» _ iks1��rrllt . 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) BRL ug/L 0.02 96-12-8 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane(DBCP) ' BRL ug/L 0.02 Method Reference: Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water,Supplement III, US EPA,EPA-600/R-95/131 Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. I i Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 L GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: EPA Method 504.1 QC Batch I D: PV-0609-E Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L CAS Number Analyfe Spiked Measured ' Recovery QC Limits Recovery 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) I 0.20 I 0.19 I 97% I 70- 130 % 96-12-8 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane(DBCP) I 0.20 0.20 I 98% 1 70- 130 % Method Reference: Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water,Supplement III, US EPA, EPA-600/R-95/131 Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: Metals Matrix: Aqueous y��11 �.:iw i� '*� k7.Aw Y�{,is+-.K.T:�'.t.� �, ��y�_': nizT � ,q�" f'xe'°�i$� t �GASiNumber �,Analyte a Metho ZQG:jBatch< yUmts Spiked NriMeasu' ed (Recovery +�QC Limits . :_-... ,7,:....:a....,,4r .:.. .,,.r r-r.. s«a+^Mar_r�.$ La??,..a.. Ka:_ �"`,sXEt;.,�.+ siFeaa..z�Ytxr+2Yx:,«.,..Ts.te9@�,SuKirr�; #x73.21LStt..:; 7439-92-1 I Lead 6010B MM-1670-W mg/L 1.0 0.92 92 % 80-120 % Method References: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III (1996). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards'Bay, MA 02532 i i i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: Metals Matrix: Aqueous Reporting CAS Number vAnalyte.-: Result Units QC`Batch Method:, Limit 7439-92-1 Lead I BRL mg/L I 0.005 MM-1670-WB 6010B Method References: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III(1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates result, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest value that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Certifications and Approvals CONNECTICUT, Department'ofi'Health-Services, M0586 Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste,Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. C. MAINE, Department of Human.,Services, MA103 Drinking Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analytes. D. MASSACHUSETTS, Department-of Environmental Protection, M-MA-103 Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,Fluoride, Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity,Total Dissolved Solids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform,Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated Biphenyls(water),Polychlorinated Biphenyls(oil). E. MICHIGAN, Department of Environmental Quality Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 F. NEW HAMPSHIRE, Department of Environmental Services, 202798 Drinking Water Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium, Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. RHODE ISLAND, Department of Health, 54 Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water, Sewage Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS � EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS "J DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRO Er SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 1py SOUTHE S 20 RIVERSIDE DRIVE LAKEVILLE, MA_02347 .., JANE SWIFT BOB DURAND Governor Secretary LAUREN A.LISS Commissioner October 21, 2002 Mr. Bertrand A.Fournier,President RE: BARNI STABLE-BWSC/SIMLP Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated RTN 4-0824 Post Office Box Number 10 Hubbard Oil Company(Fmr. Atwood Oil Co.) 33 Brooks Road Former Bulk Fuel Oil Storage Facility Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 33 Brooks Road ADIVIINISTRATIVE CONSENT ORDER ACO-SE-02-3S-009 Dear Mr. Fournier: Enclosed please find a fully executed copy of an Administrative Consent Order (the Consent Order) for the above referenced Site. The Effective Date for the Consent Order is October 21, 2002. The Consent Order has been assigned file number ACO-SE-02-3S-009. Contained within the Consent Order is the schedule to return to compliance. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at(508) 946-2799. } Sincelely, ✓Gerard M.R. Martin, F'h�iff Site Management and Permitting Section M/LAS/ka Enclosure: Administrative Consent Order CERTIFIED MAIL 9 7001 0320 0001 4830 6858 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED cc: John Klimm, Town Administrator Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 This information is available in alternate format.Call Aprel McCabe,ADA Coordinator at 1-617-556-1171.TDD Service-1-800-298-2207. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.mass.gov/dep Z�FI Printed on Recycled Paper BARNSTABLE-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0324 Page 2 of 2 Administrative Consent Order cc: Tom McKearn,Director Town of Barnstable Department of Public Health Post Office Box Number 534 Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 Bamstable Water Company 47 Old Yarmouth Road Post Office Box Number 326 Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 David C.Bennett,LSP Bennett and O'Reilly,Incorporated 1573 Main Street. Post Office Box Number.1667 Brewster,Massachusetts 02631 Robert Fasanella,with attachment Rubin and Rudman 50 Rose Wharf Boston,Massachusetts 02110 DEP-SERO Attn: Millie Garcia-Surette, Deputy Regional Director Jonathan Hobill, Regional Engineer Tom Mason, Senior Regional Counsel Theresa Barao, Public Affairs Regional Enforcement Office Data Entry This information is available in alternate format.Call Aprel McCabe,ADA Coordinator at 1-617-556-1171.TDD Service-1-800-298-2207. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.mass.gov/dep Z"w1 Printed on Recycled Paper I COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ^__ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTI,ON,, j - ;elf IN THE MATTER OF: RE: Barnstable-BWSC Mr. Bertrand A. Fournier, President ) Release Tracking NLlmbet-4=0824 Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated ) Hubbard Oil Company(Fair. Atwood Oil Co.) Post Office Box 10 ) 33 Brooks Road 33 Brooks Road ) ADMINISTRATIVE CONSENT ORDER Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 ) ACO-SE-02-3S-009 FEIN: 042489667 ) I. THE PARTIES 1. The Department of Environmental Protection ("the Department") is a duly constituted agency of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Department maintains a primary office at One Winter Street in Boston, Massachusetts 02108, and a regional office at 20 Riverside Drive in Lakeville, Massachusetts 02347. 2. Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated ("the Respondent") is a Massachusetts based corporation with a business address of 33 Brooks Road, Hyannis, Massachusetts, 02601. The Respondent owns the property located at 33 Brooks Road in Hyannis, Massachusetts. The Respondent operated a bulk fuel oil storage facility at the 33 Brooks Road property. II. STATEMENT OF LAW 3. The Department is charged with the implementation and enforcement of the "Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material Release Prevention and Response Act", M.G.L. c. 21E, as amended. ("M.G.L. c. 21E") and the regulations promulgated thereunder as the Massachusetts Contingency Plan ("MCP") at 310 CMR 40.0000 et seq. 4. The Department is authorized to assess Civil Administrative Penalties by M.G.L. c. 21A, §16 and regulations at 310 CMR 5.00. 5. M.G.L. c. 21E, Section 9 and 310 CMR 40.0170(9) authorize the Department to enter into a consent order with a responsible party ("RP"), potentially responsible party ("PRP"), or other person, which sets forth necessary response actions, time periods, deadlines for the performance thereof, and requirements for submittals to the Department. 6. 310 CMR 40.0167 authorizes the Department to establish and enforce reasonable deadlines for the performance of response actions through the issuance of an order. Barnstable—BWSC RT-N 4-0824 Page 2 of 9 e, Administrative Consent Order 7. Pertinent provisions of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan are as follows: 310 CMR 40.0835(1) Phase II Report A Phase II Report shall be submitted to the Department at the conclusion of Comprehensive Site Assessment activities pursuant to the applicable deadlines set forth in 310 CMR 40.0550 or 40.0560 or through Interim Deadlines specified by the Department. 8. Unless otherwise stated herein, the terms used in this Consent Order are defined pursuant to M.G.L. c. 21E, the MCP and 310 CMR 5.00. III. STATEMENT OF FACTS 9. For purposes of this Order, the `site" includes the strictures and property located at 33 and 51 Brooks Road, Hyannis, Massachusetts and all other areas where oil and/or hazardous material originating from the 33 and 51 Brooks Road property have come to be located. The known release from the site occurred on 33 Brooks Road, an approximately 0.75 acre parcel of land that was first developed in 1929 to accommodate a bulk fitel oil and gasoline depot. The site is also located in a Town Wide Zone II established for the Town of Barnstable. 10. On November 1, 1989, the Department issued a Notice of Responsibility ("NOR") to B&E Fournier Realty Incorporated. The NOR stated that the Department had reason to believe that B&E Fournier Realty Incorporated (Fournier Realty, Incorporated) is a potentially responsible party ("PRP") with liability under M.G.L. c. 21E, Section 5, for the release(s) that had occurred at the site. The NOR required that Fournier Realty, Incorporated conduct response actions at the site pursuant to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (the MCP, 310 CMR 40.600). The Department assigned Release Tracking Number ("RTN") 4-0824 to the site. 11. In 1990, Fournier Realty, Incorporated retained the services of LCR, Incorporated to conduct response actions at the site. Upon completion of the response actions, LCR determined that trace levels of benzene were present in the groundwater beneath the site and surficially stained soils existed in numerous places throughout the facility including the drum storage area and the oil delivery platform. 12. Between August 1992 and May 1995, three (3) underground storage tanks (USTs), ranging in size between 275 and 1000 gallons and containing #2 fuel oil, kerosene and waste oil, were removed from the site. 13: On October 1, 1993, the amended MCP became effective. 14. On August 9, 1996, the Department received a report titled "Phase I-Initial Site Investigation Report (310 CMR 40.0480), Fournier Petroleum Facility, 33 Brooks Road, Hyannis, Massachusetts, RTN: 4-000824" (the Phase I Report) dated August 9, 1996 and.prepared by RAM Environmental, L.L.0 (RAM Environmental). The Phase I Report was accompanied by a Numerical Ranking System (NRS) Scoresheet and BWSC Form Numbers ,107A, 108 and 110 titled "Tier Classification, Tier II Extension & Tier II Transfer Transmittal Form", Barnstable—BWSC RTN 4-0824 Page 3 of 9 Administrative Consent Order .. "Comprehensive Response Action Transmittal Form & Phase I Completion Statement'' and "Licensed Site Professional (LSP) Evaluation Opinion Transmittal Form", respectively. The NRS Score Sheet indicated that the site met the criteria in 310 CMR 40.0520(3)(e) established for a Tier IC Disposal Site. However, a Tier I Permit Application and corresponding application fee were not included. 15. On December 30, 1999, the Department issued a Notice of Noncompliance to Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated for failure to submit a Tier I Permit Application and applicable fee for the site. 16. On February 22, 2000, the Department received a new Tier Classification Submittal, NRS Score Sheet and a Tier I Permit Application and fee for the site prepared by SEA Consultants. The Permit Application included copies of all of the reports generated for the site to date, including the Phase I Report prepared by RAM Environmental. The Department reviewed the Phase I Report as part of the permit review process. The Phase I stated that total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) exist in the groundwater at the site at a concentration of approximately 8.0 milligrams per liter. The Phase I also stated that the site is located in the Interim Well Protection Area established for the Maher Municipal Wellfield and that the concentration of TPH exceeds the Reportable Concentration established for Groundwater Category GW-l. Based on this information, the Phase I Report concluded that an Immediate Response Action (IRA) was required at the site pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0313(3) and 310 CMR 40.0412(2). However, an IRA was never conducted. 17. On March 30, 2000, the Department issued a Notice of Noncompliance to Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated for failure to conduct an IRA at the site pursuant to 310 CMR 40.03 13 and 310 CMR 40.0412. 18. On March 31, 2000, Mr. Bertrand Fournier signed and accepted the Permit for the site. By accepting the Permit, Mr. Fournier agreed to conduct response actions at the site in accordance with the MCP and the terms and conditions contained in the Permit. The Permit became effective on April 3, 2000. 19. On April 4, 2000, the Department issued Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated a letter titled "Notice of Permit Effective Date". The letter stated that the effective and expiration dates of the Permit are April 3, 2000 and April 3, 2005, respectively. 20. On April 13, 2000, an IRA Plan was submitted to the Department for the site. BWSC Form Numbers 108 and 109, titled "Comprehensive Response Action Transmittal Form & Phase I Completion Statement" and "Tier I Minor Permit Modification Transmittal Form", respectively, were submitted with the IRA Plan. The Minor Permit Modification Form linked RTN 4-15370 to 4-0824. 21. On August 11, 2000, the Department received a report titled "Hubbard Oil Co., Inc., P.O. Box 10, 33 and 51 Brooks Road, Hyannis, Massachusetts, Release Tracking No. 4-0824, 4- 15370, Immediate Response Action (IRA) Completion Report, BWSC Form #105 titled "Immediate Response Action (IRA) Transmittal Form" and a letter titled "Immediate Response Action Completion Statement, Hubbard Oil Co., Inc., 33 and 51 Brooks Road, Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601, DEP RTN 4-0824, 4-15370", dated August 11, 2000 and Barnstable—BWSC RTN 4-OS24 i Page 4 of 9 Administrative Consent Order prepared by SEA Consultants, Incorporated. In addition, Mr. William Mallio notified the Department that he resigned as LSP-of-record for the site. 22. On April 4, 2002, the Phase II Comprehensive' Site Assessment Report and a Phase III Remedial Action Plan, if applicable, were due to be submitted to the Department. 23. On June 5, 2002, the Department issued a Notice of Noncompliance to Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated for failing to submit a Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Report to the Department =or the site. 24. On July 11, 2002, Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated notified the Department in writing that they were unable to meet the deadlines established in the Notice of Noncompliance. They also requested a meeting with the Department in order to establish a new date for the submission of the Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Report and the Phase III Remedial Action Plan. 25. On August 6, 2002, rep=esentatives from Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated, their legal counsel and LSP attended a meeting at the Department to discuss the completion of response actions at the site and the submission of Phase Reports. 26. The Respondent has violated 310 CMR 40.0550(2)(a) by not submitting a complete Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Report and Phase III Remedial Action Plan, if applicable, by April 4, 2002. IV. DISPOSITION 27. As a result of discussions between the Department and the Respondent (the "Parties"), and without admission or adjudication of any fact or law set forth above, the Parties have agreed to this Consent Order rather than expending further time and resources necessary to adjudicate this matter. 28. This Consent Order is issued by the Department pursuant to its authorities under M.G.L. c. 21A, M.G.L. c. 21E, 310 CMR 5.00, and the MCP. 29. The Respondent assents to -,he authority of the Department to issue this Consent Order and waives its rights to fiirther administrative or judicial review of this Consent Order. The Respondent reserves its right to challenge any requirement imposed by the Department beyond those set forth in this Consent Order. 30. This Consent Order is not an admission of liability or a waiver of any defenses the Respondent may raise in any proceeding to enforce this Consent Order. 31. This Consent Order represents the fiill and final agreement between the Parties concerning the Respondent's alleged failure to complete response actions at the Site in the timely manner required by the MCP described in Section III herein. However, nothing in this Consent Order shall be construed as or operate as, barring, diminishing, adjudicating or in any way affecting the legal or equitable right of the Department to issue any future order, or in any way affecting any other claim, action, suit, cause of action, or demand which the Department may initiate, except actions to recover penalties or seek equitable relief for the - j Barnstable—BWSC RTN 4-0824 Page 5 of 9 Administrative Consent Order Respondent's alleged failure to complete response actions at the Site which are addressed in this Consent Order, including, but not limited to; the: (i) recovery of costs incurred by the Commonwealth in oversight, administration and enforcement of this Consent Order; (ii) recovery of any other past or future costs incurred by the Department in connection with response activities conducted at the Site or related areas arising out of the release or threat of release or oil/hazardous materials; (iii) recovery of damages to natural resources pursuant to M.G.L. c. 21E § 5 or 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et. seq.; (iv) recovery of damages to the Commonwealth's real or personal property pursuant to M.G.L. c 2 1 E § 5; (v) enforcement of the terms of this Consent Order; and or (vi) enforcement of past or future noncompliance with any statute or regulation, except for the alleged noncompliance described in Section III of this Consent Order. The Respondent reserves all rights and defenses it may have with respect to any claims, except for those addressed through this Consent Order, that may be brought by the Department. 32. Subject to the Department's Reservation of Rights set forth in paragraph 31 of this Consent Order, compliance by the Respondent with the obligations of this Consent Order shall be considered compliance with all alleged instances of noncompliance referenced herein. The Respondent acknowledges and the Department reserves the right to sue or take any administrative action for any future noncompliance by the Respondent and the Respondent expressly reserves any rights it may have (unless expressly waived by this Consent Order) to contest and appeal the same. 33. This Consent Order is also a Notice of Noncompliance, issued pursuant to M.G.L. c. 21A, §16 and the regulations promulgated thereunder at 310 CMR 5.00. 34. The Department hereby determines, and the Respondent agrees, that the deadlines set forth in this Consent Order constitute reasonable times to perform the acts expressly agreed to in this Consent Order and that the activities required pursuant to this Consent Order otherwise meet the requirements of the MCP. 35. The activities required pursuant to this Consent Order may be subject to Department approval and the Respondent shall comply with all other applicable federal, state and local laws. 36. This Consent Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Respondent, its agents, successors and assigns. No change in property ownership alters, in any way, the Respondent's obligation to comply with this Consent Order. The Respondent shall provide a signed copy of this Consent Order to any subsequent owner, heirs, successors and assigns before any property rights are transferred. 37. The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Consent Order to each LSP, contractor or consulting firm that has been hired to conduct any portion of the work pursuant to this Consent Order. 38. Notwithstanding the terms of any contract, the Respondent shall not violate this Consent Order and shall not cause their contractors, subcontractors; consultants, LSP, successors; assigns or agents to violate this Consent Order. i Barnstable—BWSC RTIN 4-0824 Page 6 of 9 % Administrative Consent Order 39. The Department shall have the right to enter upon the Site at reasonable times to monitor compliance with the terms of this Consent Order. V. ORDER 40. Based on the foregoing statement of facts and law and pursuant to its authority under Section 9 of M.G.L. c. 2 1 E anc Section 10 of M.G.L. c. 30A, the Department orders the Respondent to undertake the actions described in Section V of this Consent Order. 41. The Respondent shall provide all data and documentation that is necessary to support the submission of all response action documents pursuant to the MCP, including, but not be limited to: (a) all final ta;Dulated data with appropriate plans and maps showing sampling points; (b) all documentation generated by the laboratory associated with the collection and analysis of samples from the site including appropriate quality assurance quality control data; (c) all calculations of hydraulic conductivity, groundwater flow direction, exposure point concentrations, and any assumptions and/or corrections made to these calculations, including graphic representations and charts; (d) and all finalized data conclusions regarding full delineation of contamination and feasible remediation options. 42. By November 21, 2002, the Respondent shall submit to the Department a Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Report ("Phase II") for the site, prepared in full accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0830. 43. By January 21,2003, if the Phase II Report, referenced in paragraph 42 above, indicates that more Comprehensive Response Actions are needed to achieve a Response Action Outcome ("RAO") at the Site, the Respondent shall submit to the Department a Phase III Remedial Action Plan ("Phase 111"), prepared in full accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0850. The Phase III Report shall evaluate the feasibility of reaching a Permanent Solution, as defined by the MCP, for the Site. 44. The deadline(s) established in Section V of this Consent Order, and any Amendment thereto, is an Interim Deadline p•-irsuant to 310 CMR 40.0167 and is not subject to a grace period pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0008(1) and 310 CMR 40.0022(1). 45. If sufficient documentation. is provided to the Department which supports a Licensed Site Professional's conclusion fzat a Condition of No Significant Risk has been achieved at the site and a Response Action Outcome Statement is provided to the Department prior to attaining Remedy Operation Status at the site, the Respondent is not required to implement any fiirther Comprehensive Response Actions at the site, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0560(3) and Section V of this Consent Order. f Barnstable—BWSC RT14-0824 Page 7 of 9 Administrative Consent Order 46. Any failure to submit the required documents described in Section V of this Consent Order, or meet other MCP requirements, may subject the Respondent to Stipulated Penalties described in Section VI of this Consent Order. 47. The Respondent shall comply with all required Public Involvement activities regarding the Site, as described in 310 CMR 40.1400. 48. The Respondent shall submit all applicable reports to: Laura Stanley Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Southeast Regional Office 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, Massachusetts 02347 49. All documents will be deemed to be delivered upon receipt by the Department. VI. STIPULATED PENALTIES 50. If the Respondent fails to comply with any action or deadline described in this Consent Order without the express approval of the Department, the Respondent shall pay the Commonwealth, upon demand, stipulated penalties in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day per violation for each day such violation occurs. NOTE: Per day violation amounts shall double on the thirtieth (30th) consecutive day of noncompliance, treble on the sixtieth (60th) consecutive day of noncompliance, and quadruple on the ninetieth (90th) consecutive day of noncompliance, with maximum per day penalty not to exceed $25,000 per day, per offense. 51. All payments of stipulated penalties shall be by check, certified check, cashier's check or money order, made payable to the "Commonwealth of Massachusetts". All stipulated penalty payments shall be sent to the following address: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection P.O. Box 3584 Boston, MA 02241-3584 The name, Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated, its Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN 0424,,89667) and the Consent Order file number, ACO-SE-02-3S-009-STIP, must be clearly printed on the face of the check or money order. A copy of the check must be sent to the Department of Environmental Protection, Southeast Regional Office, 20 Riverside Drive, Lakeville, Massachusetts 02347, Attention: Laura Stanley. Barnstable—BWSC RTN 4-0824 Pave 8 of 9 L Administrative Consent Order VII. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 52. The terms and conditions of this Consent Order shall take effect on the Effective Date, which is the date on which the Consent Order is signed by the Department. 53. The undersigned represents that he/she has the authority to bind the Respondent to this Consent Order. 54. The Department represents that the Regional Director has the authority to,issue this Consent Order on behalf of the Department. 55. If the Department determines that the Respondent's request to extend the deadlines is reasonable, it may, on its oven initiative or upon a reasonable documented request from the Respondent, extend any deadline established in Section V of this Consent Order through a written amendment. If the Respondent has reason to know that any event has occurred or may occur which could cause delay of performance of the actions described in this Consent Order, the Respondent may submit a written request to the Department to extend the deadlines for performing the actions described in this Consent Order. For the Department to consider the Respondent's request, the request must be submitted as soon as the Respondent learns of the delay, but not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the deadline. The request shall contain the following information: (a) The anticipated length and cause of the delay; (b) The measure(s) to be taken to minimize the delay; and (c) A timetable for implementing those measures; and (d) If the delay is due to a failure to obtain property access, the Respondent shall certify in writing that it has followed the requirements of 310 CMR 40.0173 that describe the procedure for obtaining property access, when requesting the extension. The Department may unconditionally approve, disapprove, or approve the Respondent's request with necessary modifications. 50_. Failure of the Department to complain.of action or non-action on the part of the Respondent shall not constitute a waiver by the Department of any of its rights hereunder. Furthermore, no waiver by the Department of any provision herein shall be construed as a waiver of any other provision herein. 5-. If any term or provision of:his Consent Order, or the application thereof, to any person or circumstance, shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Consent \7 yr Barnstable—BWSC RTN 4-0824 Paee 9 of 9 Administrative Consent Order Order, and the application thereof, shall not be affected, and each remaining term and provision shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 58. Any submission(s) required by this Consent Order shall be accompanied by the applicable fee(s). -SO ORDERED: FOR RESPONDENT, Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated. BY: DATE: /4 oz_ Bertrand A. Fournier, President Federal Employer Identification Number: 042489667 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BY: � . � 16/Z DATE: Paul A. Taurasi, P.E. Regional Director I TOWN OF BARNSTABLE OMPL/ANCE: CLASS: 1.Marine,Gas Stations,Repair satisfactory 2. Printers BOARD OF HEALTH 3.Auto Body Shops O unsatisfactory- 4.Manufacturers COMPANY_A_4iLsP �i��G (see"Orders") 5.Retail Stores 6.Fuel Suppliers ADDRESS "IV Class: 7. Miscellaneous QUANTITIES AND STORAGE (IN= indoors; OUT=outdoors) MAJOR MA =R S _ n IN OUTI IN I OUT IN OUT #&gallons Age Test Fuels: Gasoline Jet Fuel (A) Die , #2(B) ��(f aw Heavy Oils: waste motor oil (C) new motor oil (C) transmission/hydraulic Synthetic Organics: degreasers Miscellaneous: j I DISPOSALIRECLAMATION REMARKS: _ 1. Sanitary Sewage 2.Water Supply 0 Town Sewer ATublic On-site OPrivate 3.Indoor Floor Drains YES NO 0 Holding tank:MDC 0 Catch basin/Dry well 0 On-site system 4. Outdoor Surface drains:YES ZNO ORDERS: O jiolding tank:MDC ACatch basin/Dry well�!"-V 0 On-site system 5.Waste Transporter 'Name of Hauler Destination Waste Product Licensed?! 2. P son(s) Interviewed Inspector Date i`` The Town of Barnstable ASS. Office of Town Manager 9 ass. i639. A`�� 367 Main Street, Hyannis MA 02601 fD Mp'l Office: 508-862-4610 John C.Klimm,Town Manager Fax: 508-790-6226 Joellen J.Daley,Assistant Town Manager MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Geiler, Director of Regulatory Services FR: John C. Klimm, Town Manager DT: June 20, 2002 RE: Notice of Noncompliance Correction Fmr. BP Service Station 230 Iyanough Road and Oil Distribution Facility 33 Brooks Road For your information, enclosed is a letter dated June 17, 2002 from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding the above-captioned matter. Thank you. JCK/lmb Enclosure E U E _ D TOWN OF BARNSTABLE CA/W&M/LICENSE/PARIVORD-VIOL -� COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS =s EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION zr SOUTHEAST-REGIONAL OFFICE 20 Riverside Drive, Lakeville, MA 0 TOT' OF6Ae?N;jQ6 LE JANE SWIFT t; Governor BOB DURAND '02 JUN 19 Secretary PI2 :05 LAUREN A.LISS Commissioner June 17,2002 Mr. John Klimm, Town Administrator RE: BARNSTABLE-BWSC SMP Town of Barnstable RTN 4-0392 & 4-0824 Town Hall Fmr. BP Service Station(NON-SE-02-3S-007) 367 Main_ Street 230 Iyanough Road Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 And Oil Distribution Facility(NON-SE-02-008) 33 Brooks Road NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE CORRECTION Dear Mr. Klimm: On June 5, 2002, the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (the*"Department") issued a Notice of Noncompliance to Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated (Hubbard Oil)for the former BP Service Station located at 230 Iyanough Road, in Hyannis, Massachusetts and the former Fuel Oil Distribution Facility located at 33 Brooks Road in Hyannis, Massachusetts. The Notices were issued to inform Hubbard Oil that they have not submitted. a'Phase IIf.Comprehensive Site Assessment Report and, if necessary, a Phase III Remedial Action Plan pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0835 and 310 CMR 40.0861 within two (2) years of the respective permit effective date. The Notice of Noncompliance issued for the former BP Service Station also informed Hubbard that an application for a Permit Extension pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0724 was not submitted. These Notices stated that William J. Mallio was the Licensed Site Professional of record for the sites at the time the Noncompliance occurred. The purpose of this letter is to correct an error made in Attachment 1 of the Notices of Noncompliance titled "Noncompliance Summary". Specifically, Mr. William Mallio was not the LSP of record for the former BP Service Station and the forme. Fuel mil Distributior. Facility at the time the Noncompliance occurred at these sites and is not currently the LSP of record. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Laura Stanley, at the letterhead address or by telephone at(508)946-2880. Sifey, erard M.R.Martin, Chief Site Management*Permitting Section M/LAShere This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)574-6872: DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.mass.gov/dep Co Printed on Recycled Paper MW BARNSTABLE-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0392&4-0824 Page 2 of 2 Notice of Noncompliance Correction cc: Mr.Bertrand Fournier Tom McKearn, Director Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated Town of Barnstable 33 Brooks Road Department of Health Post Office Box#10 Post Office Box 534 Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 Barnstable Water Company William J.Mallio, LSP 47 Old Yarmouth Road SEA Consultants,Incorporated Post Office Box 326 485 Massachusetts Avenue Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 Cambridge,Massachusetts 02139 DEP-SERO ATTN: Laura Stanley, Compliance and Enforcement Branch Chief, SMP Regional Enforcement Office(2 copies) Data Entry i pyt� �• �n G U 6 a '�' ,Qir 6.e�-moo �� Q Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Resources 109989 -� E OR PRINT ONLY Well Completion Report 1. WELL.LOCATION GPS,(OPTIONAtL) LATITUD / .LONGITUDE Address at Well Locatio 00 QAQet/ Property Owner: oRs -z 60`�� l v e Subdivision Name:� Qfi�� Mailing Address O vT E U/fLI �/ll C- City/Town: Q.V A//J City/Town: k--70 iV cf Gu tell Assessors Map Assessors Lot#: NOTE: Assessors Map and Lot# mandatory if no.street address available Board of Health permit obtained: Yes ❑ Not Required Permit Number Date Issued 2. WORK PERFORMED 3. PROPOSED USE 4. DRILLING METHOD ew Well ❑ Abandon ❑ Domestic ❑ Irrigation ❑ Cable r-mrtu ger ❑ Deepen ❑ Recondition nitoring ❑ Municipal ❑ Air Hammer .0 Direct Push ❑ 'Replace ❑ Other ❑ Industrial ❑ Other ❑ Mud Rotary 1 ❑ Other 5. .WELL COGS_ Cc Unconsolidated Consolidated 6. SITE-SKETCH (use permanent landmarks with distances) Permeability > ZI c >Co From (ft) To (ft) High Low `� to (5 0 o Other Rock Type ` 777-1 x i Q ` Q`�r r 7. WELL CONSTRUCTION 8. CASING Total Depth Drilled _eU 0 7 From (ft) To (ft)r-� Casing Type and Material Size O.D. (in) Well Seal Type 1 Date.D filling Complete C�tlTo t,/-7 C- 9. SCREEN From (ft) To (ft) Slot Size Screen Type and Material Screen Diameter dr 0 1 . 0/O 2� V(Z. a 10. FILTER PACK/GROUT/ABANDONMENT MATERIAL 11. ADDITIONAL WELL INFORMATION Developed? ta=yes ❑ No From (ft) To (ft) Material Description Purpose Fracture 61 ` � �Q /0Al ETC- a� Enhancement? ❑ Yes CC�o .14 okTE aS G.a1— Method Disinfected? ❑ Yeso 12 WELL TEST DATA(PRODUCTION WELLS) 13. STATIC WATER LEVEL(ALL WELLS) Yield . Time Pumped Drawdown to Time Recovery to Depth Below Date Method (GPM) (hrs & min) (Ft. BGS) (hrs & min) (Ft. BGS) Date Measured Ground Surface (FT) 14. PERMANENT PUMP(IF AVAILABLE) 15.NAMEIADDRESS OF PUMP INSTALLATION COMPANY Pump Description �� , Horsepower Pump Intake Depth (ft) Nominal Pump Capacity (gpm) -16.COMMENTS 17 WELL DRILLER'S STATEMENT This well was drilled and/or ab doned and€r my supervision, according to applicable rules and regulations, and this repo is comple a and c rect to the best of my knowledge. J lt�C,t1�� T Dt;ille• 0.'�.Ct4�1� '-S�i`pervising Driller Signature: �fO �---Registration #:r Firm: 1f'A1_W'dl w�L� /� /� Date: ���` Rig Permit#: NOTE: Well Completion Reports must be filed by the registered well driller within 30 days of well completion. ; 'r , ,,BOARD OF HEALTH.COPY,',', COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION "y SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 20 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, LAKEVILLE, MA 02347 JANE SWIFT Governor RECEIVE® BOB DURAND Secretary LAUREN A.LISS 0 ~�M JUN 7 2Q02 Commissioner �O I��.JJtJ U TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Tune 5, 20 HEALTH DEPT. Mr. Bertrand Fournier,President RE: BARNSTABLE-BWSC/SMP Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated RTN 4-0824 33 Brooks Road Hubbard Oil Company(Fmr. Atwood Oil Co.) Post Office Box#10 33 & 51 Brooks Road Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE NON-SE-02-3S-006 THIS IS AN IMPORTANT NOTICE. FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE ACTION IN RESPONSE TO THIS NOTICE COULD RESULT IN SERIOUS LEGAL CONSEQUENCES. Dear Mr.Fournier: The Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (the "Department") is currently regulating a release of oil and/or hazardous material that occurred at the Hubbard Oil Company, formerly Atwood Oil Company (the "Site") located at 33 Brooks Road in Hyannis, Massachusetts pursuant to M.G.L. c.21E and the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (the "MCP"), 310 CMR 40.0000. The Department was first notified of the release-at the Site on November 1, 1989. The Department's records indicate that Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated (Former Atwood Oil Company) is a Potentially Responsible Party(a"PRP")for the release. This Notice is provided to inform you that you are not in compliance with the 'MCP. The Department has no record of your completing the response actions required by the MCP to address this release. Attachment I of this Notice is a Noncompliance Summary sheet that outlines the.provisions of the MCP that you have not complied with. Contained within the Noncompliance Summary are the necessary action(s) you must complete to return to compliance. Additionally, there is a prescribed deadline for your completion of the action(s). Notwithstanding this Notice of Noncompliance ("NON"), the Department reserves the right to exercise the full extent of its legal authority in order to obtain full compliance with all applicable requirements, including, but not limited to, criminal prosecution, civil action including court-imposed civil penalties, or administrative penalties assessed by the Department. Be advised that the deadlines stated in the Noncompliance Summary Sheet cannot be extended. Be further advised that you will remain out of compliance with the provisions of this Notice until all of the corrective actions stated in the Noncompliance Summary Sheet have been completed and This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)574-6872. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.mass.govidep Z�h1 Printed on Recycled Paper .......... BARNSTABLE-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0824 Page 2 of 2 Notice of Noncompliance documentation is submitted to the Department confirming the actions have been completed in accordance herewith. Finally,Attachment 2 of this Notice is a fact sheet containing supplemental information regarding this NON. If you have any questions regarding this matter, or if you would like to discuss compliance with this Notice, please contact Laura Stanley, at the letterhead address or by telephone at(508)946-2880. All future communication regarding this matter must reference Release Tracking Number 4-0824. S m* c e _12— erard M.R!Martin, Chief Site Management&Permitting Section M/LAS/re Attachment 1: Noncompliance Summary Sheet Attachment 2: Supplemental Information Regarding the Notice of Noncompliance CERTIFIED MAIL#70010320 00014832 6511 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED cc: John Klimm, Town Administrator Town of Barnstable Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 Tom McKearn, Director Town of Barnstable Department of Health Post Office Box 534 Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 Bdinstdble Water Company 47 Old Yarmouth Road Post Office Box 326 Hyannis,Massachusetts'02601 William Mallio,LSP SEA Consultants,Incorporated 485 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge,Massachusetts 02139 DEP-SERO ATTN: Laura Stanley, Compliance and Enforcement BranchChief,.SMP Regional Enforcement Office(2 copies) Data Entry _. ....,....... .. ._ _...._..,..," _....., . .....u.. ..... 4 w r r ATTACHMENT 1 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY ENTITY/POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY IN NONCOMPLIANCE: Mr. Bertrand Fournier,President Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated 33 Brooks Road, Post Office Box#10 Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 LOCATION WHERE NONCOMPLIANCE OCCURRED OR WAS OBSERVED: Hubbard Oil Company(Former Atwood Oil Company),RTN 4-0824 33 &51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,Massachusetts DATE WHEN NONCOMPLIANCE OCCURRED OR WAS OBSERVED: April 5,2002 LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL AT TIlVIE OF NONCOMPLIANCE: Mr.William J.Mallio,LSP Number 4966 SEA Consultants, Incorporated 485 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge,Massachusetts 02139 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY OR CONDITION RESULTING IN NONCOMPLIANCE: On February 20, 2000, the Department received a Tier Classification Submittal and a Tier IC Permit Application (the Tier IC Permit) for the Site prepared by SEA.Consultants, Incorporated (SEA Consultants). .The Department approved the Tier IC Permit and it became effective on April 3, 2000 pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0751. On April 13, 2000,the Department received a Tier I Minor Permit Modification(the Permit Modification) for the Site prepared by SEA Consultants. The Permit Modification stated that the 33 and 51 Brooks Road properties are located adjacent to one another and that both properties served as bulk oil storage facilities. The Permit Modification also stated that both properties are owned by B&A Fournier Realty, Incorporated. Based on this information,the Permit Modification proposed to link RTN 4-15370 to RTN 4-0824. The Department approved the Permit Modification on April 20, 2000. The Department also indicated in its letter titled "Minor Permit Modification Approval', dated April 20, 2000 that future response actions must be conducted at the Site in accordance with the terms, conditions and timeframes established in the Tier IC Permit. Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0550(2)(a), a Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Report for both RTNs(a Phase H Report) and, if applicable, a Phase III Remedial Action Plan(a Phase III Plan)shall be submitted to the Department within two (2) years of the Permit effective date. The Department has not received a Phase II Report and a Phase III Plan for the Site to date. Therefore, you have not complied with the provisions in 310 CMR 40.05 5 0(2)(a). _......................_.........._... BARNSTABLE-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0824 Page 2 of 2 Notice of Noncompliance-Attachment I DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT NOT COMPLIED WITH: Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0550(2)(a), a Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Report and, if applicable, a Phase III Remedial Action Plan shall be submitted to the Department within two (2) years of the Permit effective date. A Tier I Permit shall become effective twenty-one (21) days after the date the Department issues and receives a signed Permit Acceptance Statement as defined by 310 CMR 40.0750(1). DESCRIPTION AND DEADLINES OF ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN: The following actions must be completed within the timeframes specified below: 1. By July 12, 2002, submit to the Department a Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment Report ("Phase II Report") and a Risk Characterization prepared in accordance with 310 C'VIR 40.0835 and 310 CMR 40.0900, respectively. 2. By July 12, 2002, submit to the Department a Class A or B Response Action Outcome ("RAO") Statement pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1000 or a Phase III Remedial Action Plan prepared pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0861, if the Phase II Report indicates that comprehensive response actions are necessary to achieve an RAO at the Site. The Remedial Action Plan ("Phase III Plan") must also include a feasibility evaluation pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0860. If at any time during the MCP cleanup process documentation is submitted to the Department to support the conclusion that a level of No Significant Risk and a Class A or B Response Action Outcome Statement have been achieved for the entire Site, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1000, additional response actions are no longer necessary at the Site {310 CMR 40.1003(1)). - If a Phase IV Completion Statement or a Response Action Outcome Statement is submitted to the Department at least ninety(90) days prior to the expiration of a Tier I Permit or a Tier I Permit Extension, additional Tier I Permit Extension submittals are not required to be filed with the Department pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0580(2), 310 CMR 40.0702(1)and 310 CMR 40.1003(1). Upon performance of all of the required response actions under this Notice, your LSP should certify that the Respondent has implemented response actions in accordance with M.G.L. c.21E and the MCP and complied with this Notice. Notwithstanding this Notice of Noncompliance, the Department reserves the right to exercise the full extent of its legal authority to obtain full compliance with all applicable requirements, including but not limited to, criminal prosecution, civil action including court-imposed civil penalties, and Civil Administrative Penalties issued by the Department. If you have any questions regarding this matter, or if you would like to discuss compliance with this Notice, please contact Laura Stanley at the letterhead address or by telephone at (508) 946-2880. All future communications regarding this matter must reference Release Tracking Number 4-0824. For the Department of Environmental Protection: DATE: J v NAME: Gerard M.R. Martin, Chief Site Management&Permitting Section i ............ ............... ............................. ATTACHMENT 2: NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION This attachment further explains why this Notice of Noncompliance (NON)has been issued to you. Why was I issued this NON? The Department's records indicate that you have not submitted one or more of the documents, or conducted one or more of the response actions, listed in the attached NON. This NON was issued to inform you of this fact and offer you an opportunity to come back into compliance by submitting the missing information to the Department, or conducting the response actions, by the deadlines specified in the NON. The Department's records also indicate that you were issued a Tier I Permit (the Permit). By accepting the Permit, you agreed to conduct response actions at the site in accordance with the terms and the conditions set forth in the Permit and the provisions of the MCP, 310 CMR 40.0000. In addition, you agreed to notify the Department in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0172 if you are/were unable to proceed with such actions. What happens if I fail to comply with or respond to the NON? You have a specified amount of time from the date you receive the NON to comply, as is stated in Attachment 1. If you fail to comply, you may be subject to* additional enforcement action by the Department including, but not limited to, criminal prosecution, civil action including court-imposed civil penalties,or administrative penalties. If a penalty is assessed, your total penalty exposure may be considerable. For example, penalties can be assessed for each day you remain in noncompliance.'Note that the Department is allowed by law to back calculate daily penalties to begin on the date you received the NON. As a result,you may be penalized thousands of dollars should you fail to comply with or respond to the NON by the deadline specified. Please refer to the Civil Administrative Penalty Statute, Chapter 21A, Section 16 and 310 CMR 5.00, and the Civil Administrative Penalty Regulations, for complete details on the Administrative Penalty rules. When the cleanup contractor finished the work in the field, I thoullht my dealin2s with the Department were finished.What more do I have to do? This is a common question asked..when a NON is received. PRPs often think their dealings with the Department are over when, for example, the fieldwork is completed by a cleanup contractor. Examples of the types of fieldwork completed include the removal of contaminated soil; installation of groundwater monitoring wells; collection and analysis of soil, groundwater, air or surface water samples., and installation and/or operation and maintenance of a remedial system (examples include a groundwater pump and treat system, a soil vapor extraction system and/or an air sparging system). The fieldwork may be complete, but you still must submit documentation (such as Immediate Response Action Status and Completion Reports, Phase Reports, and a Response Action Outcome Statement) to the Department to prove that the cleanup was undertaken in compliance with the MCP and the terms and conditions of the Tier I Permit. The Department tracks the progress of cleanups by checking to see if you are sending information about your cleanup progress on time. For example, if we do not receive the Phase Reports described in 310 .................... .......... ....................... ........... ............................... ..................... ..................... BARNSTABLE-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0824 Page 2 of 2 Notice of Noncompliance—Attachment 2 CMR 40.0800 within the time frames allotted in the MCP, (refer to 310 CNIR 40.0550) or a Response Action Outcome (RAO)Statement within five(5)years of the effective date of the Tier I Permit, we must assume that you are either not implementing any cleanup activities at all or are conducting response actions at the site without a valid Permit. Without your cooperation in obtaining the cleanup information, the Department does not know whether serious environmental problems are being addressed. If work is not being performed or is not being performed in compliance with the Tier I Permit,the Department must take action to ensure it happens. On the other hand, you may have finished the cleanup but neglected to forward the appropriate documentation required by the MCP and the Permit. What do I have to do to comply with the NON? In order to comply with the NON, you must conduct the response actions, if applicable, and submit the documentation stated in Attachment I of this NON,Noncompliance Summary. Please be advised that all response actions not directly managed by Department staff must be overseen and directed by a"Licensed Site Professional" or LSP. LSPs are licensed by the Commonwealth, and their stamp and signature are required (together with yours) on all but one form you must submit to the Department. For information on hiring an LSP,you may call the LSP Board at(617)556-1091. You should be aware that the Department does not become involved in or help mediate billing disputes with insurance companies, cleanup contractors, or LSPs. A common respo-nse to a NON is that an insurance company is slow on paying cleanup bills or will not cover various cleanup costs. We *also hear that cleanup firms and LSPs will not send in RAOs and other forms because their clients have not paid their bills. These matters must be resolved privately by you. You ultimately must comply with the attached NON or be subject to significant penalties from the Department. S°E A Consultants Inc. April 24,2000 Science/Engineering/Architectu re CERTIFIED RECEIPT MAIL#Z 325 301 000 Mr.Tom McKearn Hazardous Waste Coordinator Health Department Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 Re: Notice of Immediate Response Actions Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc.(Former Atwood Oil) 33 and 51 Brooks Road Hyannis,Massachusetts Release Tracking Number 4-0824,4-15370 S E A Ref.No. 99426.04-A Dear Mr.McKearn: As per 310 CMR 40.0703 of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP), an Immediate Response Action (IRA) will be undertaken to evaluate soil and groundwater conditions at the above referenced properties. This will include installation of three monitoring wells, sampling of six wells and evaluation of surface staining at the site (33 and 51 Brooks Road). An IRA Plan was submitted to the Southeast Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) on April 13, 2000. DEP approved the IRA Plan on April 20,2000. Field activities are scheduled to commence in May,2000. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at(617)498-4635. Very truly yours, S E A CONSULTANTS INC. William J.Mall uo,LSP,Ph.D. Project Manager cc: Laura Stanley,DEP Southeast Regional Office,Lakeville,MA Ca Massachusetts Avenue Evelyn Read,Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc.,Hyannis,MA Cambridge, MA 02139-4018(617)497-7800 Patrick KCambridge, orths, S E A Consultants Inc., MA FAX(617)498-4630 Email cambridge@seacon.com I:\_clients\hubbard\iranoticebohatwood.doc Rocky Hill, CT Rochester, NY Concord, NH Web site http://wwwseacon.com COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS o DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PIZQMCZW 20 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, LAKEVILLE, MA 02347 508- -2 �y ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI BOB DURAND Governor Secretary JANE SWIFT LAUREN A.LISS Lieutenant Governor Commissioner April 20, 2000 Mr. Bertrand Fournier,President RE: BARNSTABLE-BWSC/SMP Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated 33 Brooks Road (Former Atwood Oil Company) Post Office Box 10 33-51 Brooks Road Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 RTN 4-0824 MINOR PERMIT MODIFICATION/IRA PLAN APPROVAL Permit#31003452 M.G.L. c.21E and MCP, 310 CMR 40.0000 Dear Mr.Fournier: On March 20, 2000, the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (the Department), conducted an inspection of the property located at 51 Brooks Road in Hyannis, Massachusetts. At the time of the inspection, seven (7) 55-gallon unlabeled drums and approximately seven (7) rusted storage tanks were observed at this location. The drums were located on a concrete pad adjacent to the railroad tracks. The drums were observed to be rusted and dented. The platform is cracked and shows signs of staining. Groundwater samples collected from two (2) monitoring wells located on the adjacent property (33 Brooks Road) contained total petroleum hydrocarbons at concentrations of 8.0 mg/1. The Reportable Concentration for total petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater is 1.0 mg/1. Based on this information, the Department determined a release occurred at 51 Brooks Road and issued you a Notice of Responsibility for this release. In addition, the.Department assigned Release Tracking Number (RTN) 4-15370 to this release. On April 13, 2000,the Department received a Tier I Minor Permit Modification(the Permit Modification) and an Immediate Response Action Plan (the IRA Plan) dated April 2000, prepared by SEA Consultants,Incorporated. The Permit Modification stated that the 33 and 51 Brooks Road properties are located adjacent to one another and operated as bulk oil storage facilities. The Permit Modification also stated that both properties are owned by B&A Fournier Realty, Incorporated. Based on this information,the Permit Modification proposed to link RTN 4-15370 to RTN 4-0824. This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)574-6872. DEP on the World Wide Web: http:/twww.magnetstate.ma.us/dep Z�� Printed on Recycled Paper Barnstable-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0824 Page 2 of 3 Minor Permit Modification/IRA Plan Approval The Department reviewed and approves the Tier I Minor Permit Modification. Please be advised that future response actions should be conducted at the 33-51 Brooks Road site in accordance with the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (310 CMR 40.0000) and the Tier IC Permit for RTN 4-0824 issued to you on March 16,2000. EMNMDIATE RESPONSE ACTION PLAN The IRA Plan submitted with the Minor Permit Modification proposed the execution of six (6) borings and the installation of three (3) monitoring wells at the site. A soil sample will be collected from each boring and field screened with a Photoionization Detector. A soil sample will also be collected and analyzed for volatile and extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH/EPH), ethylene dibromide, methyl tertiary butyl ether and eight(8) RCRA metals. A groundwater sample will also be collected from each of the newly.installed wells and analyzed for VPH/EPH, ethylene dibromide, methyl tertiary butyl ether and the eight (8) RCRA metals. In addition, approximately ten (10) cubic yards of petroleum impacted soil seven (7) 55-gallon drums and several rusted storage tanks will be removed from the site. The Department approves the IRA Plan with the following conditions: 1. A monitoring well is installed hydrogeologically downgradient of the former above ground storage tanks located on the 51 Brooks Road portion of the site. A groundwater sample should be collected from this well and analyzed for VPH/EPH, chlorinated solvents, ethylene dibromide, methyl tertiary butyl ether and eight (8) RCRA metals. In addition, a groundwater sample should also be collected from the monitoring well designated as PW-1 on Figure 2 titled "Site Plan, Hubbard Oil Company" (the Site Plan) and analyzed for volatile organic compounds including chlorinated solvents. 2. Post excavation soil samples are collected and analyzed for VPH/EPH, ethylene dibromide,methyl tertiary butyl ether and eight(8)RCRA metals. 3. -The timeframes specified in the IRA Plan are enforceable interim deadlines pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0167. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter, please contact Laura Stanley at(508) 946-2880. Sincerely, erard M.R.Martin, hief Site Management&Permits Section M/LAS/rr Barnstable-BWSGSMP RTN 4-0824 Page 3 of 3 Minor Permit Modification/IRA Plan Approval CERTIFIED MAIL NO. Z 240 878 637 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED cc: Town of Barnstable Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis,MA 02601 ATTN: James Tinsley,Town Administrator Town of Barnstable Board of Health Post Office Box 534 Hyannis,MA 02601 ATTN: Tom McKearn,Director Barnstable Water Company 47 Old Yarmouth Road Post Office Box 326 Hyannis, MA 02601 ATTN: George Wadsworth SEA Consultants,Incorporated 485 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge,MA 02139 ATTN: William Mallio,LSP DEP-SERO ATTN:.Mildred Garcia-Surette,Deputy Regional Director Gerald_Monte, Chief, Compliance& Enforcement Joseph Kowal, Chief,Audits and Site Management Data Entry COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL P 20 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, LAKEVILLE, MA 02347 508- - p Y ' ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI BOB DURAND Governor Secretary JANE SWIFT LAUREN A. LISS Lieutenant Governor Commissioner March 30,.2000 Mr.. Bertrand Fournier, President RE: BARNSTABLE--BWSC/SMP Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated Hubbard Oil Company,Incorporated 33 Brooks Road (Former Atwood Oil Company) . P. O. Box 10 33 Brooks Road v kly G A Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 RTN 4-0824 NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE NON-SE-00-311-015 This is an important notice. . Promptly respond to any requests contained herein. Failure to respond to any such requests could result in serious legal consequences. I Dear Mr.Fournier: The Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (the Department), as a result of its review of the above mentioned file, hereby notifies you (as used in this Notice"you"refers to Hubbard Oil Company,Incorporated)that response actions at the above- referenced site are not in with one or more laws, regulations, orders, licenses, permits, or approvals enforced by the Department.-- Attached hereto is a written description of. (1) each activity referred to above, (2) the requirements violated, (3) the action the Department now wants you to take, and (4) the deadline for taking such action. If you fail to come into compliance by the prescribed deadline(s) or if you otherwise fail to comply in the future with requirements applicable to you,you could be subject to legal action. This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)574-6872. DEP on the World Wide Web: http:/Avww.magnet.state.ma.us/dep 10 Printed on Recycled Paper Barnstable-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0824 Page 2 of 4 e Notice of Noncompliance The Department is authorized to take any one or more of the following actions against you for failure to comply with the requirements imposed by M.G.L. c. 21E and the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, 310 CMR 40.0000: Imposition of double the amount of permit fees otherwise owed; Assessments of up to three (3)times the amount of all response action costs incurred by the Department,plus sanctions for failure to perform response actions under the MCP; Assessment of interest on costs incurred at the rate of twelve percent (12%), compounded annually;. Assessments for damage to natural resources; Placement of liens on all property located in the .Commonwealth, with authority to foreclose; - Initiation of civil judicial action brought by the Attorney General; and/or - Initiation of criminal action prosecuted by the Attorney General. In addition to the above list of prospective legal actions, the Department may assess a civil administrative penalty for every day from now on that you remain out of compliance with the requirements described in this Notice of Noncompliance. If performance of the necessary response actions is beyond your technical, financial or legal ability, you should promptly notify the Department in writing of your inability in accordance with Chapter 21E, subsection 5(e), and 310 CMR 40.0172. An adequate demonstration of technical, legal, or financial inability could provide you with a limited defense to an action by the Commonwealth for recovery of two to three times the Department's response action costs, as well as a limited defense to the Department's assessment of civil administrative penalties. Questions regarding this matter should be directed to Laura Stanley at the letterhead address or at (508) 946-2880. Any future correspondence regarding this site should reference the Release Tracking Number 4-0824. Sincerely, rand M.R.MartQnm, * f Site Management&Permits.Section M/LAS/rr Barnstable-BWSGSMP RTN 4-0824 Page 3 of 4 . Notice of Noncompliance CERTIFIED MAIL NO. Z 333 585 523 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Attachment-Notice of Noncompliance cc: Town of Barnstable Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 ATTN: James Tinsley, Town Administrator Town of Barnstable Board of Health Town Hall Post Office Box Number 534 Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 ATTN: Tom McKeam, Director RAM Environmental, L.L.C. 140 Samoset Street Post Office Box Number 1040 Plymouth,Massachusetts.02362 ATTN: Michael Pierdinock,LSP SEA Consultants, Incorporated 485 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 ATTN: William Mallio, LSP DEP-SERO ATTN: Mildred Garcia-Surette,Deputy-Regional Director Kevin Kiernan,Deputy Regional Counsel Regional Enforcement Office(2 copies) Data Entry Barnstable-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0824 Page 4 of 4 lb Notice of Noncompliance NONCOMPLIANCE SUMMARY NON-SE-00-3R-015 NAME OF ENTITY IN NONCOMPLIANCE: Bertrand Fournier,President Hubbard Oil Company,Incorporated 33 Brooks Road P.O.Box 10 Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 LOCATION WHERE NONCOMPLIANCE OCCURRED OR WAS OBSERVED: Hubbard Oil Company,Incorporated j (Former Atwood Oil Company) 33 Brooks Road Hyannis,Massachusets 02601 DATE WHEN NONCOMPLIANCE OCCURRED OR WAS OBSERVED: June 8, 1996 LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD AT TEVIE OF NONCOMPLIANCE: Michael Pierdinock,License Number 4078 I DESCRIPTION OF NONCOMPLIANCE AND OF THE REQUIREMENTS NOT COMPLIED WIT- On August 9, 1996, the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau.of Waste Site Cleanup (the Department) received a Numerical Ranking System Score Sheet and a report titled "Phase I — Initial Site Investigation Report (310 CMR 40.0480), Fournier Petroleum Facility, 33 Brooks Road, Hyannis, Massachusetts, RTN: 4-0000824." (the Phase I Report) dated August 9, 1996, prepared by RAM Environmental,L.L.C. The Phase I Report revealed that total petroleum hydrocarbons exist in the groundwater at the site at a concentration of approximately 8.0 milligrams per liter(mg/1). The Report also indicated that the site is located in the Interim Well Protection Area established for the Maher Municipal Wellfield and that the TPH concentration exceeds the Reportable Concentration established for Groundwater Category GW-1. Based on this information, Michael Pierdinock determined that an Immediate Response Action (IRA) was required pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0313(3) and 310 CMR 40.0412(2), (refer to Section 7.4 of the Phase I Report). However,an IRA was never conducted at the site. ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN,AND THE DEADLINE FOR TAKING SUCH ACTION: Submit to the Department by April 14,2000,an Immediate Response Action Plan prepared pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0424. The Plan should be designed to evaluate a potential substantial release migration condition pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0413(2)(b)through(d)and(f). For the Department of Environmental Protection: DATE: 3o Z-100 NAME: 4erard .Martin,C ief Site Management&Permits Section COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS = EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS + d DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL P O 20 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, LAKEVILLE, MA 02347 508- - �e ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI BOB DURAND Governor Secretary JANE SWIFT LAUREN A.LISS Lieutenant Governor Commissioner March 14,2000 Evelyn Read, General Manager RE: BARNSTABLE--BWSC/SMP Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporated Hubbard Oil Company Post Office Box 10 33 Atwood Street 33 Brooks Road RTN 4-0824 Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 TRANSMITTAL#31003452 INITIAL PERMIT APPLICATION STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLETENESS Dear Ms.Read: The Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (the Department), has completed its Administrative Review of the Permit Application for the above- referenced site and determined it to be administratively complete. This determination was made on March 6,2000. Accordingly,the Department will begin its Technical Review. According to 310 CMR 4.04, the Department now has to complete its Technical Review and issue a final decision to grant or deny the permit. The Department may request additional information during the course of the Technical Review.. This Initial Technical Review Period (T-1) shall result in either a decision to grant or deny the permit, a proposed permit decision, or a statement of Technical Deficiencies. Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0722 (2), a Public Comment Period (PC-1) of 20 days shall run concurrently with T-1 for those persons who notified the Department of their interest in reviewing or submitting written comments on the permit application. The permit application for the above referenced site is now available for review and comment in the Department's Regional Service Center located in Lakeville, Massachusetts. The comment period for this document ends on March 15, 2000. When submitting comments to the Department, please include the site name, Transmittal Number and the site Release Tracking Number 4-0824. Please submit comments in writing to: This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)574-6872. DEP on the World Wide Web: http:/M+ww.magnet.state.ma.us/dep ��� Printed on Recycled Paper Barnstable-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0824 Page 2 of 3 Statement of Administrative Completeness 1 Laura Stanley Department of Environmental Protection 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, Massachusetts 02347 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0722 (2)(e) and 310 CMR 4.04(2)(b)2.c., if a Statement of Technical Deficiencies is issued, the applicant shall respond to the Department within 30 days of issuance of such Statement of Deficiencies. by submitting any additional material to support the application and address deficiencies. Pursuant to 310 CUR 4.04 (2) and 310 CMR 40.0721 (5), a determination of Administrative Completeness shall not constitute any finding with respect to the technical suitability, adequacy or accuracy of the material submitted, and shall-be no bar to a request to amend, revise, replace, or supplement such materials based on technical suitability, adequacy or accuracy. The Department may request additional information during the course of the Technical Review. Withdrawal of the permit application shall be subject to the provisions of 310 CMR 4.04 (3) (d). In accordance with 310 CMR 4.04 (2)(e)3. f. and 310 CMR 40.0720(3),the applicant and the Department may, by written agreement, extend any schedule for timely action or any portion thereof Provided your application is technically adequate, and none of the contingencies outlined in 310 CMR 4.04 occur,the Department will issue a final decision within the timefi-ames listed in 310 CMR 40.0722. You will be entitled to a refund of your application fee should the Department fail to complete its final review of your application and make a decision to grant or deny the permit within these timefi-ames. Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1400, the PRP should conduct minimum public involvement activities for this proposed work plan. This should include submitting a copy of the work plan and LSP Opinion to the Town of Barnstable Administrator and Board of Health when the original work plan is submitted to the Department. If you have any questions,please call Laura Stanley at(508)946-2880. Sincerely, Gerard M. R. Martin, Chief Site Management and Permits Section MILAS/rr Barnstable-BWSC/SMP RTN 4-0824 Page 3 of 3 Statement of Administrative Completeness CERTIFIED MAIL NO. Z 240 863 762 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED cc: Mr. James Tinsley, Town Administrator Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 Town of Barnstable Department of Health Post Office 534 Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 ATTN: Tom.McKearn,Haz:Waste Coordinator SEA Consultants,Incorporated 485 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge,Massachusetts 02139 ATTN: William Mallio,LSP DEP-SERO ATTN: Mildred Garcia-Surette,Deputy Regional Director Mark Jablonski,Permitting Branch Chief Data Entry MEW S E A Consultants Inc. Science/Engineering/Architecture February 22,2000 CERTIFIED RECEIPT MAIL#Z 325164 202 Mr.Tom McKearn Hazardous Waste Coordinator Health Department Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 Re: Notice of Tier IC Permit Application Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc. (Former Atwood Oil) 33 Brooks Road Hyannis,Massachusetts Release Tracking No.4-0824 S E A Ref.No. 99426.03-A Dear Mr. McKeam: As per 310 CMR 40.0703(8)(a)(1) of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, a copy of a legal notice associated with the permit application for the above referenced property is attached to this transmittal letter for your use. This legal,notice will appear in the Cape Cod Times on March 3,2000. If you have any questions or comments,please call me at(617)498-4635. I Very truly yours, S E A CONSULTANTS INC. William J.Mallio,LSP,Ph.D. Project Manager Enclosure cc: Laura Stanley,DEP Southeast Regional Office,Lakeville,MA Evelyn Read,Hubbard Oil Co.,Inc.,Hyannis,MA 485 Massachusetts Avenue Patrick Korths, S E A Consultants Inc.,Cambridge,MA Cambridge,MA 02139-4018 (617)497-7800 I:\_clients\hubbard\teir 1 noticea.doc FAX(617)497-7709 Email cambridge@seacon.com Rocky Hill, CT Webster,NY Concord, NH Web site http://www.seacon.com NOTICE OF INITIAL SITE INVESTIGATION AND WASTE SITE CLEANUP PERMIT APPLICATION HUBBARD OIL CO., INC. (FORMER ATWOOD OIL) 33 BROOKS ROAD HYANNIS, MASSACHUSETTS RELEASE TRACKING NUMBER 4-0824 Pursuant to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (310 CMR 40.0480), an Initial Site Investigation has been performed at the above referenced location. A release of oil and/or hazardous materials has occurred at this location which is a disposal site (as defined by M.G.L. c. 21E, Section 2).. This site has been classified as Tier IC (310 CMR 40.0500) and an Initial Tier. IC Permit Application is being submitted on February 22, 2000 to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0703. A permit is required to proceed with a Comprehensive Remedial responses at all Tier I sites. Anyone interested in reviewing the permit application should notify DEP by writing to the Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup, Permit Section, Southeast Regional Office at 20 Riverside Drive, Lakeville, MA by March 24, 2000. If anyone notified DEP of his or her interest in reviewing or submitting comment on the Tier I permit application, DEP will conduct a public comment review period of twenty (20) days which shall run concurrently with DEP's Initial Technical Review of the application. Anyone who fails to notify DEP in writing of his/her interest in commenting on the application by the above date may be deemed to have waived his/her rights, if any, to appeal DEP's permit decision or to intervene in an adjudicatory proceeding with respect to this application,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0770(2). M.G.L. c. 21E and the Massachusetts Contingency Plan provide additional opportunities for public notice of and involvement in decisions regarding response actions at disposal sites: 1) The Chief Municipal Official and Board of Health of the community in which the site is located will be notified of major milestones and events, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1403; and 2) Upon receipt of a petition from ten or more residents of the municipality in which the disposal site is located, or of a municipality potentially affected by a disposal site, a plan for involving the public in decisions regarding response actions at the site will be prepared and implemented,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1405. To obtain more information on this disposal site and the opportunities for public involvement during its remediation, please contact William J. Mallio, Project Manager, S E A Consultants Inc., 485 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 at(617) 498-4635. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS `. • FOR IN-STATE WASTE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OIL ONLY DIVISION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OR One Winter.Street IN-STATE VSGG HW/WO. Boston, Massachusetts 02108 ,se print or type.(Form designed for use on elite(12- •tch)typewriter.) enerator US F) LQ No. Manifest 2.Peg 1 Information in the shaded areas UNIFORM HAZARDOUS c r/1 Document of is not required by Federal law. WASTE MANIFEST J �A 3 ante Manifest Document Number 3 3.Generator's Name and Mailing Address J U I M{1�s K 15 5 21z2 " D r V' (3 V y V B.State Gen.ID 73 -3 (3/0 4.Generator's Phone U EPA ID Number Ln S 8`Tr D . 6. U r r 5.yy+T+��ranspo teerrf!I Company Name �t rV 0.Transporter's Phone( 1 E-' YN g• US EPA ID Number � I 7-Transporter 2 Company Name Late I rans. � � 10. US EPA ID Number to dit F :Transporter',.Phone i ) Yam. - 19• icl l .+'I" 1 i.i .. P. C:. BC))( G StateFacility's.IO ..q r TJ facy's Ptionti i { SI TIr1i31ir3�'•IETON. MACIL2-072 230377 V 12.Containers 13•: 14. 1• Total Unit Waste No., .. 11.US DOT Description(Including Proper Shipping Name,Hazard Class,and 1D Numbed No. Type Quantity WtNol apETTROLEUM 08L C"OM80STIBLE ExattK31 # 113 Z M i b• Z1 D • O c. iD M i -- —1 1 D I d. H Z Fiard'inc r 'r:. rf r'Nr:�tns I *cd Abzvrf f/) - c.'?r� aP f...tt.,{?ftCi:f h'.0...� ('P - .. . ._ .... Y€rC Co'*::•s .� i vial Y.a,id1;l;,Snstruc ;nns a:,'Additions!tr.!,rr "n y�V"l�,L I Cir 3 EA�EP13Et4CV # 1..RES�t�([�;E: 781-34f--51U9. O.O.T. EMERGEt4CY OU'De "I 2A ii ULI _ _ - -- hichwa ' 1 GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION:I hereby declare that the con r':his consignment are tuity and accurately described above by proper shipping name and are classified,packed,marked,and '»i,-r.,end arc.•t:•• �erts in proper conCri;. 'u:transport by Y according to applicable international and national government•eguiar;-As. f generated to the degree I have Bete m nee d'>e -nr i:m'ce4y pracucah!a rrl r.to n.race" �• '..!and tci icily r' e 9-' ' n a large W,r.,b'Y Sane"+^r,I Certify that I have a f ! ' ,�.. ,,.ai�a.,l, r c••minimizes the Present and future hr.at to human cosh and the ert i nr- nler.. t and that i have sctzi.ied the prccticable methud of tre , ,.us'^q• • .s0eet the bee:wave manage — -, nor n min;OR,if I am a small Quatity gene•ator,I have m,..,�,•g c?.n afford. -- onrh T v a Prinred/TYpe,d Name -- _ 11s- •.� "� .SC Date— T I ?7,Transporter 1 Acknow` ment f Receipt of fJ,dte sic _ __—_: —= M i (1gv Y I Slgnrlurel, ( � Ai Printed/Typed Name _V - { 5 I WA Date n L O I 18.Transporter_2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of MaterialE Month Day Ye,'a �R 7 Signature � T Printed/Typed Name i E R i 19.Discrepancy Indication Space F A lHor Operator:Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 1 Date Month Day YearSignatured Name F corm Approved OMB No.2050-0039 FPA Form 8700-22(Rev. 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. 1 COPY>4 : GENERATOR RETAINS Y Ter 1-800 899.1038 • OUTSIDE MA'1-781-344=0265 1771 Washington St., P.O.Box 119 (r Y fl Stoughton,MA 02072 �: _ � fflYlflOflfflEOTflI _� S I fl Y I C E S EPA No. MAD 0823 777 Check No. trill LIC. NOS. MA-40.TNH 0019.VT Date — CT-HW-28. RI 315. ME-HWT 84023 JReceived from dq f1 Address �oK' QUANTITY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CHARGED WASTE AUTOMOTIVE OIL PAY TH I I N V01 C E STATE TRANSPORTED FEE NO STATEMENT WILL BE SENT T al- S r - Drivr X e COC 78e.288 Receiver X I �— 6- / i r+ /L'D v r ol/`p/L, �� C (/"(Olt 0(ti� L/y ITF O1P k S 4:G, j / �✓ss�y�0 (,f— w/ s EvN,�y GZ��• j' c �� O �'� ca,w..c O�n..�. tn.Yze O�i✓v w,J f- a�S , ' l,-e- T'W a oGw�,,,i� 01 Zvi GGw� cNv.�L. �- Hof Cy Dv-1, cy GT+ d-r�Scf of,t q ov o�✓ J'(�a G� �I�Q�e h y o0-&5!r - e 2ft.4, t:t 61---c dl Vt-L- !fir T YLO- Ot s o�eJ 14 joe.-& i of oG,�.�►.� r d c�, 1� c.�P�• S Ga-v ld Gc, fi C o� GP�,� {vz Gce.� duo u� G -. C�z�jOl G�.a ¢ '(�-�.�2 J 0%�r d r a✓1�} 'mil} r7 ®,- I r,,m-s c4� YL-a-C-4X d� a/ �q . Y- CGS- C70, -.,01 , (zeaop W t l l e a u Y--�, / G P�,a t-. 1, D-�lL %S Sr- �,e S v s ss GG�.�o{ H-► t. ntvf�. !/ d•`y� ,� Q. 1 S t.-O V..-Vv2 1.7'Co i %a&- a'e- f F•- TOWN OF BARNSTABLE COMPLIANCE: CLASS: 1.Marine,Gas Stations,Repair satisfactory BOARD OF HEALTH 2.3.Auto Body Shops unsatisfactory- 4.Manufacturers COMPANY 6 r ®` �" (see"Orders") 5.Retail Stores 6.Fuel Suppliers ADDRESS 3 S gvv--L' �° Glass: y 7.Miscellaneous QUANTITIES AND STORAGE (IN=indoors;OUT=outdoors) MAJOR MATERIALS Case lots Drums, . Above Tanks Under6rround IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT #&gallons Age Test Fuels: Gasoline Jet Fuel (A) Diesel, Kerosene, (B Heavy Oils: 1 waste motor oil (C) new motor oil(C) L;):j ,4'rF ► �t=s x transmission/hydraulic Synthetic Organics: l degreasers Miscellaneous: cad Pw,.,_t5 ,-, 6o.7 S 7 D rvvy i 0 V V%ievt•�v 2-jam T o ; ( 1 e S -Nc IxC s's-y o SY Gj(X d 11—S X 0 d DISPOSALIRECLAMATION REMARKS: 1. Sanitary Sewage 2.Water Supply 0, / vies .160 -av A O Town Sewer Public H /a;-A' ,,yq� O On-site O Private j j y y Q 1 I v3'T s 3. Indoor Floor Drains YES N0 O Holding tank:MDC_ O Catch basin/Dry well ±! t c4v,,.s on—i OOn-site system tnztrJ-. 5 l S •( (�+ �br,.r.drtirr� 4. Outdoor Surface drains:YES-,K NO ORDERS: Q Holding tank:MDC kjeve� c-- ck�g';w crl 1,3 v;d dv(,u,!g e_.e S*►ecf O Catch basin/Dry well tJv'1•-.1 i'�; �ic�'C �L✓1 v;r:L��'t;W'1,J�'� `.'i'v►i'l /Ts�'yl�-lYt' ( lOn-site system SC7 f, .r'•�C3., jal, w f➢r` g, �1 to t' �vW�1 Z"i �... 5.Waste Transporter -ZA( t vs, -4)•6' t) Z d c ; re ' (,,k rt< -wit��� Name of Hauler Destination Waste Product Licensed? "<"111 YES NO �,^ 1. 2. Person (s) Interviewed Inspector / Date ���;; r ys'�� �f `7 ,V-,A O TOWN OF BARNSTABLE HEALTH DEPARTMENT 367 MAIN STREET HYANNIS, MASS.02601 ( j� 0 .y,r. } �,Y,.t:'{` L-%•tom,;. 44 a#,Au D 21�0 T-7-77' 3 1 �'b:. §n +b M _ ��;.. 1 3 �1 �. R r � n... ' '+« `� � � R"���� �r�i �s+ �" � " I - � ��� E f pp�xx a i i 1 , ��� r. 4 � S F � �� .•fir. `"t� r' t., T ,� � ,y ,.yF• y'+s .<i' rye �_\ i` ;ems ��� t`��• `1 E i ,; �� .,.� k . ,�; ': . ,�� � . �_ � _ _I� �, '+ it ��< </ ,�11� � � � Ii s ' a t � �`' � ' %- � � - 1 �� '� i {{ i�`' \, ^�� .�Z. ��, ; �� � ' '� �� �!� �a.� ��__ . ���t. �F � ��� �J � ��• ~_, �� rim .'!� .__ s � I� , f� ,, t �� � �l LC.�i:1+. �- y T, r ,' a. i .. d , '" ,, �1 � ,, , �� f.� �` -. , _rr `� ,�, '�. ��� � �: .��"»*:. ' y, f l S � �� ��� ?-o 1 3 �� _ ,.�� �. ��A ��� ,�� � t, �,� �� ,• �� � _ ""' �� � � w y ��N' � :' ��. � Y rr I �I �,� • - '� 7 4 7 G-- i t 1 ,t;, ,.�_ r � f '�1 4 � F� r aZJ `'� !4 I � tti� 4. i �Y�((\'I jf y. . 4s; k "� 7;,� \ d ���I��.� ����v� f.b; ...; � - i � I O w'.lr. ...�"€ � . �? Y�_ -� `, , ` � � � N7 Y-� �r�`.f a��l .tof �4 j�q(.�r'yF�r, i r Y' j'�.� � .iR � .i-eY��.M,�����r.r 1 �•� '�•'.��''b,:f"�-l• �=-tip =.u? `.E � � � • i i t r P4iw(t.*.r.. 33 iS.-eo 1�yak.afS. Soil s4wjb.r" Ir,&liv $•.7•tT ST-v&A d,rvw�t• 9A.! idol Mc_ wI/. Ia/sfoaasIL t 1 a►ro v -044". T -_i y 5.. �. f` $ � All C/ � 2—la-qg �o v►h1G� Pew/ttiw., 3.� �,,r,,,�.. ' �o(•, ffYa.r��:�'• q 6ow.aGee.aoC�go,,l� t J L, > t t i q u � �Z-j�` ! 8 �pvrM%BI rG'h°1G�P.✓iw/ �'3j 8roo� Rd. M y0.,,.,:S, 444. o--, A#et- ,r/sl/- u..�.. v�,.4cN oa•�e. S 9a! Pala; ka+�.;l s+4v....�. S ai!p,r.r.�..d.�L4e r•�. S� g�,d��.•.t cK� �iw�o�Fy• � f+Es�•rKf t6n,f etis. ' - .�.i.{y 11 f`} ).`1...�..f',^.. _'S"^ -__.�..-� ��4i- 4`vifrhy+i ` CAM ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION•ASSESSMENT•MANAGEMENT August 14, 1996 �v Warren Rutherford, Town Manager Town of Barnstable Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 RE: Fournier Petroleum Facility 33 Brookds Road,Hyannis,Massachusetts RTN 4-0000824 RAM Ref.No. 132.1 Dear Mr. Rutherford: On behalf of Fournier Petroleum Company, Inc., enclosed is a copy of the Public Notice which will be published in a local newspaper associated with the Phase I Initial Site Investigation and Tier Classification recently conducted at the above referenced Site. This notice will be published in the Cape Cod Times, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0590 and 310 CMR 40.1403 (6). - If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at(508) 747-7900, extensions 127. Very truly yours, RAM Environmental, LLC Michael J. Pierdinock, LSP, CHMM Principal Enclosure cc: Mr. Timothy McKean, Director, Board of Health DEP, BWSC, Southeast Regional Office Mr. Bert Fournier, Pres., Fournier Petroleum Company, Inc. C:\132.3\96CORRES\0814RUTH.W PD RAM ENVIRONMENTAL,LLC - 140 SAMOSET STREET • P.O.BOX 1040 • PLYMOUTH,MA 02362 508-747-7900 • FAX 508-747-3658 B Y NOTICE OF AN INITIAL SITE INVESTIGATION AND WASTE SITE CLEANUP PERMIT APPLICATION Fournier Petroleum Facility 33 Brooks Road, Hyannis, Massachusetts Release Tracking Number 4-0000824 Pursuant to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan(310 CMR 40. 0480), an Initial Site Investigation has been performed at the above referenced location. A release of oil and/or hazardous material has occurred to this location which is a disposal site(as defined by M.G.L. c. 21 E, § 2). This site has been classified as a Tier IC (310 CMR 40.0500), and an Initial Tier IC Permit application is being submitted on September 3, 1996 to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0703. A permit is required to proceed with a Comprehensive Remedial Response at all Tier I sites. Anyone interested in reviewing the permit application should notify DEP by writing to Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup, by September 24, 1996. If anyone notifies DEP of his or her interest in reviewing or submitting comment on the Tier I permit application, DEP will conduct a public comment review period of twenty (20) days which shall run concurrently with DEP's Initial Technical Review of the application. Anyone who fails to notify DEP in writing of his/her interest in commenting on the application by the above date may be deemed to have waived his/her rights, if any, to appeal DEP's permit decision or to intervene in an adjudicatory proceeding with respect to this application, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0770(2). M.G.L. c. 2 1 E and the Massachusetts Contingency Plan provide additional opportunities for public notice of and involvement in decisions regarding response actions at disposal sites: (1) the Chief Municipal Official and Board of Health of the community in which the site is located will be notified of major milestones and events, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1403; and (2) upon receipt of a petition from ten or more residents of the municipality in which the disposal site is located, or of a municipality potentially affected by a disposal site, a plan for involving the public in decisions regarding response actions at the site will be prepared and implemented, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1405: To obtain more information on this disposal site and the opportunities for public involvement during its remediation, please contact Michael J. Pierdinock, LSP, RAM Environmental, LLC, 140 Samoset Street,P.O. Box 1040,Plymouth,Massachusetts, 02362 at(508)747-7900,extension 127. C A 132.1\96DOCS\NOTIC E 1.W P D ..� Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Department of Environmental Protection 11 Southeast Regional Office y William F.Weld Govemw Trudy Coxe f Secretary,EOEA S, David B. Struhs Commissioner May 13 , 1996 Mr. Tom Fournier, General Manager RE: BARNSTABLE--WSC/SMP-4-0824 Hubbard Oil Company, Incorporation Atwood Oil Company Brooks Road 33 Brooks Road Post Office Box 10 SITE STATUS/REQUEST FOR Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 INFORI�IATION, M.G.L. c.21E and MCP, 310 CMR 40. 0000 Dear Mr. Fournier: On November 1, 1989, the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (the Department) issued you (as used herein "you" and "your" refers to B&E Fournier Realty) a Notice of Responsibility for the above-referenced site. The Notice of Responsibility informed you that Atwood Oil Company located at 33 Brooks Road in Hyannis, Massachusetts is a disposal site pursuant to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (the MCP, 310 CMR 40. 000) . The Notice of Responsibility also informed you of your legal responsibility associated with the cleanup of the site and requested that a Phase I Limited Site Investigation Report be submitted to the Department. On March 26, 1990, the Department received a report titled "Phase I Limited Site Investigation, 33 Brooks Road, Hyannis, Massachusetts" dated February 20, 1990, prepared by LCR, Incorporated (LCR) . The Report indicated that a fuel oil depot has existed at the site since 1929. The Report also indicated that trace quantities of benzene were detected in the groundwater beneath the site and surficially stained soil was present in the drum and vehicle storage areas, around the aboveground storage tanks, beneath the waste oil tank fill cap and around the northeast corner of the garage. Based on this information, LCR recommended that at least one (1) additional monitoring well be installed at the site and a Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment be completed. The Department listed Atwood Oil Company as an Unclassified Disposal Site at which releases of oil and/or hazardous material have occurred on January 15, 1990. On October 1, 1993, the revised MCP (310 CMR 40. 0000) became effective. The MCP was re-designed to streamline and accelerate the cleanup of releases of oil and hazardous material to the environment. The revised MCP and Chapter 21E of the Massachusetts General Laws contain specific requirements 20 Riverside Drive a Lakeville,Massachusetts 02347 • FAX(508)947-65V • Telephone (508) 946-2700 i �a -2- that must be met by those responsible for Unclassified Disposal Sites. The MCP requires responsible parties connected with a site to evaluate it to determine whether a reportable release of oil and/or hazardous material has occurred and whether further response actions are required. l• If you take appropriate action before August 2, 1996, you can minimize your cleanup costs, maintain compliance with the MCP, and avoid possible enforcement action by f the Department. You must employ a Licensed Site Professional (an LSP) to file an LSP Evaluation Opinion. LSPs are professionals licensed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to issue Opinions in connection with waste site cleanups. For a list of LSP names, contact the Board of Registration at (617) 556-1145. The LSP Evaluation Opinion for this site must be submitted by August 2A. 1996. That Opinion must indicate that: 1. there has not been a reportable release pursuant to 310 CMR 40. 0300 and no response actions are necessary; or 2. a reportable release has occurred pursuant to 310 CMR 40. 0300 but previous response actions sufficiently cleaned up the release; or 3 . a reportable release has occurred pursuant to 310 CMR 40. 0300 and additional response actions are necessary; or 4. further cleanup actions must be taken. The site must also be assessed and classified by August 2, 1996 if the LSP makes this determination. Alternatives to Filing an LSP Opinion If you filed a report with the Department prior to October 1, 199.3 which recommended that no further actions are necessary at this site, you may submit a certified statement that affirms that recommendation. If the cleanup will be adequately regulated by a --.. hazardous or solid waste permit or approval, please contact Laura Stanley at (508) 946-2880. If you believe filing an LSP Evaluation Opinion is beyond your financial, legal or technical ability, you must notify the Department of your inability to file by following the procedures of 310 CMR 40. 0172. -------------------------------- The specific requirements that must be met for Unclassified Disposal Sites can be found in the MCP at 310 CMR 40. 0620. -3- Compliance Fees i If you file an Opinion or affirm a no further action recommendation by August 2, 1996, the Department will not assess an Annual Compliance Fee for the first year. If you fail to do so, the site will be classified as a Tier IB disposal site and you may be subiect to enforcement action by the Department. A Tier IB Annual Compliance Fee of $2, 600 per year will be assessed if you take actions after the August 2, 1996 deadline. Should you have questions regarding this letter, please contact Laura Stanley at the letterhead address or at (508) 946- 2880. The Department appreciates your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Since ely, Gerard M.R. Mar 'n, Acting Chief Site Management and Permit Section M\LAS\re CERTIFIED MAIL NO. P 256 393 468 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED cc: Barnstable Board of Health P.O. Box 534 Hyannis, MA 02601 ATTN: Tom McKearn, Hazardous Waste Coordinator Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 ATTN: Warren Rutherford, Town Manager DEP - SERO ATTN: Andrea Papadopoulos, Deputy Regional Director Jonathan Hobill, Acting Regional Engineer Data Entry i Commonwealth of Massachusetts mi- -A--A Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Department of Environmental Protection Southeast Regional Office William F.Weld Governor Trudy Cox e D Secretary,EOEA O Thomas B. Powers Acting Commissioner June 11, 1994 B & A Fournier Realty, Inc. RE: BARNSTABLE--WSC/SA-4-0824 P.O. Box 1238 Atwood Oil Co. . Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 Brooks Road UNCLASSIFIED CONFIRMED TRANSITION SITE ATTENTION: Mr. Alfred Fournier M.G.L. Chapter 21E and 310 CMR 40. 0000 .Gentlemen: The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has redesigned the Waste Site Cleanup Program. . The revised Massachusetts Contingency Plan ("MCP") and related fee regulations (310 CMR 4.00) became effective on October 1, 1993 . This letter is being sent to you regarding the above- referenced confirmed disposal site which. is listed on DEP's August 1993 Transition List of Confirmed Disposal Sites and Locations to Be Investigated, or Addendum thereto. You (as used in this letter "you" refers to B&A Fournier Realty, Inc. ) have been previously identified as a "Potential Responsible Party" (PRP) for the above- referenced site with liability under MGL c.21E §5. NECESSARY RESPONSE ACTIONS AND APPLICABLE DEADLINES This site shall not be deemed to have had all the necessary and required response actions taken for it unless and until all substantial hazards presented by the release and/or- threat of release have been . eliminated and a level of No Significant Risk exists or has been achieved in compliance with M.G.L. c. 21E and the MCP. A Phase I Limited Site Investigation has been .completed for this site as documented in a report dated February 20, 1990, prepared by LCR, Inc. The Department anticipates that Comprehensive Remedial Actions may be necessary at this site to address the release of volatile organic compounds to soils and possibly groundwater at the site. The enclosed MCP Transition Fact Sheet #2 explains the requirements for unclassified confirmed sites. The new MCP offers two viable options with deadlines for a responsible party to submit to the Department the necessary submittals. However, because this site is located within an approved •zone II for several public water 20 Riverside Drive • Lakeville,Massachusetts 02347 • FAX(508)947-6557 • Telephone (508) 946-2700 r 1 -2- supply wells and just upgradient of the Maher Electric Public Water Supply Wellfield; the Department requests that the required information be submitted to the Department no later than- November 21, 1994. The Department would like to meet with you and PRPs for neighboring sites on August 10, 1994, .at 10 a.m. at the Department's Southeast Regional office located at 20 Riverside - Drive, Lakeville, Massachusetts, to discuss coordination of remedial response actions at the sites listed below: • Former Charter Service Station, (DEP Site 4-0026) • Former BP service Station (DEP Site 4-0392) • Nelson Coal & Oil (DEP Site 4-0716) • Atwood Oil Corporation (DEP Site 4-0824) • Former Cotton Pickin T's (DEP Site 4-0852) • Mobil Service Station (DEP Site 4-0862) • Barnstable Water Company Property (DEP Location 4-0976) In addition, the MCP requires persons undertaking response actions to perform Immediate Response Actions in response to sudden releases, Imminent Hazards and Conditions of Substantial Release Migration. Such persons must continue to evaluate the need for Immediate Response Actions and notify the Department immediately if such a need exists. We recognize that there may be difficulties and confusion during the transition of existing sites from the 1988 MCP to the new MCP. The new MCP, however, offers many incentives and opportunities for streamlined, timely, and efficient cleanups. It is the Department's intent to provide you with as smooth a transition as possible. Please be aware that failure to comply with any provisions of the revised MCP may result in the Department taking enforcement action against you. Should you have any questions about this letter, or to inform the Department whether you intend to comply with the Department's requirements, please contact Maria Pinaud or Jonathan Hobill at (508) 946-2862 or at the above address., Very truly yours, Gregg Hunt, Acting Regional . Engineer for Waste Site Cleanup H/MP/rr Attachment: The 1993 MCP Transition Fact Sheet #2 Fact sheet on LSPs -3- CERTIFIED MAIL #P 337 626 808 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED cc: Barnstable Board of Health P.O. Box 534 Hyannis, MA 02601 .ATTN: Tom McKean Hazardous Waste Coordinator Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 ATTN: Warren Rutherford Town Manager DEP - SERO ATTN: Mark Jablonski DEP - SERO - Data Entry h �r� � � �" ���'�iGg�2z, Ca-P�-�r2/ �ir �2- I J ��� � ��� ���e_ �� �d�� � ���2, � �'��� �� �� ��%C a� � �'���� a, I0� l� ��� o � � � ��� o ��� � ��� � ���� � � ��� ��`G�� �ru�n � , or%eo 0�� �� ��� �� � .. ._ __._. .:._.. __ _ .. ...:.. _.. :.. ... 0. &Zer-4t Daniel S.Greenbaum Commissioner Gilbert T.Jolyae ®� � Regional Director NO W IS OPY _ November 1, 1989 TNEDEP�IF?Ta'>ri=�IT�?F ENVIRONMENTAL PROT€C770N. B & E Fournier Realty RE: BARNSTABLE--WSC-4-08urooks Rd. , Atwood oil Company, p.0. Box 1238 - NOTICE OF RESPONSIBILITY, Brooks Road preliminary Assessment/Phase I Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 M.G.L. , Chapter 21E and ATTENTION: Alfred Fournier, 310 CMR 40.000 � Vice President Gentlemen: This letter concerns the existence of petroleum hydrocarbons and other hazardous materials present in the environment around the Atwo Oil referred Company located on Brooks Road, Hyannis, Massachusetts, to as the site) . nation In an att'empt� to determine the source ofy well field asaMaher1Wellse water quality at the public waterPP 1, 2 and 3 , the Barnstable Water Company obtained ground water samples downgradient of the subject site. Results of the analyses of said samples indicate the presence of volatile organic compounds. by The assessment and cleaPOi1 and disposal Hazardoussites MaterialrReleaseM.G.L. , chapter 21E, the Massachusetts and by3se CMR Prevention and Rachusettsnse Act ContingencyrPlanG(hereafter, the MCP) . 40. 000, the Massachusetts tion, the Departmet has reason Based upon the available n whereafter rreferrednto as Atwood)tis a believe that the Atwood Oil company potentially responsible party (PRP) with liability under M.G.L. , c. 21E, Section 5. Section 5 makes the following parties liable to the Commonwealth: current andrp answners and/or orted, stored�,erators disposedfof orte; any treated person who arranged for o P person who in any way caused hazardous materials to or at the site; or any the release or threat of release oil aor withouthazardouregardrtol nature fault. of this liability is joint and several Original Printed on Recycled Paper 2 The Department is authorized pursuant to M.G.L. , c. 21E, Sections 3A (j ) and 4 to take such response actions at the site as it deems necessary should Atwood fail to respond to these releases in an appropriate and timely manner. Any, response actions taken by the Department will be 'dictated by the individual characteristics of the site and by the time lines set out in M.G.L. , c. 21E, Section 3A and the MCP. The Department encourages PRPs to take response actions to assess and cleanup contamination at sites. By taking the response actions Atwood makes it unnecessary for the Department to have its contractor perform the work. If Atwood does not take..the necessary response actions the Department is authorized by M.G.L. c. 21E sections 3A'(j ) and 4 to have the work performed by its contractor and recover up to three (3) times its costs from Atwood. I Regardless of who performs the necessary work at the site, Atwood may be liable for all the Department's response action costs. Response action costs include the cost of direct hours for work performed by Department employees in overseeing or arranging for response actions, any expenses incurred by the Department in support of those direct hours, as well as payments to the Department's contractors (for more details see the cost recovery regulations at 310 CMR 40.600 et sea. ) . In addition to Atwood's liability for up to three (3) times the response action costs incurred by the Department, Atwood may also be liable for damages for loss of natural resources, and interest on the total outstanding liability at the rate of 12% compounded annually. To guarantee payment of this debt the Department may place a lien on all of Atwood's property within the Commonwealth. To recover the debt the Department may foreclose on the lien or the Attorney General may bring a court action against Atwood. As a party potentially liable for the release at the site, the Department requires that you, on Atwood's behalf, take the steps outlined below: 1. Provide the Department with a written response within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this Notice, indicating whether Atwood intends to take the necessary actions. 2 . Contract with a consultant knowledgeable in hazardous waste site assessment and abatement to conduct the following work in accordance with the MCP: a. Complete and submit, within forty-five (45) days of receipt of this Notice, a Preliminary Assessment Report (copy enclosed) meeting the requirements of 40.541 of the MCP. b. A Phase I-Limited Site Investigation as outlined in 40.543 of the MCP. r• 3 - C. Complete the Interim Site Classification Form (copy enclosed) in accordance with 40.544 of the MCP. The Phase I Report documenting all Phase I activities shall be prepared and submitted, in conjunction with the Interim Site Classification Form, to the Department within 90 days of receipt of this Notice; and j c. The consultant....shall also evaluate the need for a Short Term Measure (STM) as defined in 40.542 of• the MCP. If at any time an imminent hazard is discovered at the site, you must immediately notify the Department, and submit a proposal for a STM. This evaluation shall continue throughout the assessment process for the site. Depending on the information generated by the above work, the Department may require additional investigations, studies and actions. Be advised that the site has been placed on the Massachusetts Hazardous Waste Site List in accordance with M.G.L. , C. 21E, Section 3A, resulting in the tracking of the progress of this site by the Department. Should you have any questions regarding this Notice, please contact Maria Ramirez at (508) 946-2862 . In any correspondence to this office, please refer to case WSC/SA 4-0824 . The Department looks fordward to your cooperation in cleaning up the site. Very truly yours, ter, �� Cl MArk Beg ey, CIYYefZ Site Remediation Section B/MR/kd Enclosures CERTIFIED MAIL #P965994410 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED cc: BWSC-Boston Hazardous Waste Coordinator Town Hall Hyannis, MA 02601 4 - Barnstable Water Company P.O. Box 326 i Hyannis, MA 02601 i ATTN: George Wadsworth DWS-SERO ATTN: David DeLorenzo f FIISTORIC GROUNDWATERBamstable, WF•LLGAUGING GROUNDWATER WELL GAUGING MA IDENTIFIED SOIL IMPACT(>S-1/GW-1) Reference Site Plan by SEA Consultants,Inc. .� n,TT m.c• nw ,uA., nor, n^,c n,2nC5 n.ic..o..,,, m,h., T.,r ,,,.° ;.0•4 u,�Y, °,' ^: ""° °' Cambridge,MA Scale l MW-i L<S, 2X.I3 3,.,0 rS r, \+W-SS 3A.99 15.N1 23.29 's 50'Er M ZONE"A" [65'L X 50-W X 27'D] Reference Site Plan for Robie's Refrigeration 33 7 712 4s.0 za.0 N,a nz•^, hnlsD IthN 15.52 2J.42 124- TB- 4: 3'-8' bgs(DIESEL) RAO by Horsley&Witten,Inc. d 26 A,W-3 ,S.OA 2"o 21 Jp \+W+N 3020 IR.N n41. LOCUS SI:{.1 ,R3) 37riM1 2a.71 �0 uw-0o 3P.20 15.71 z{,9 TB-II: 3'-2T bgs(DIESEL) �Oo 9� SI:_{-^ <°m2 )u.11 Mi,, G71-1 3V24 15.61 2,t,cY b F siwa St.. 30)0 WA, ,7,,.2 79.31 13.7'1 235; ZONE"B" [65'L X 45-W X 28'D] srA-1 4.37 24.04 24 33 mwe SEA-2 A'02 26.,9 N 51 SEA-1(SB): I'-24'bgs(GASOLINE/DIESEL) 2`�•O n E Roa fNlw '-iiA, Ew.iR 20AN ,�','- "„r. GROLR.'U\V:\'ft-:RWELLG.oUGING SEA-SB-3: I'-15'bgs(GASOLINE/DIESEL) / 2 S o Noux Roaa S9 h,w-2 <s.A, 28.1.1 rn.-.1 ��:m„• ,1,1�m,.'„•. TB-6: I S'-28'bgs(GASOLINE) F 8 °w--3 ,S°S '_M1.h7 2111 ttU,V"rt1'r{I RfW� ,9.i4 :kN 20.`r, 4\\j5S 3R.. Iti?0 __ f.I `S� D ZONE"C" [IS'L X 10-15'W X 5'D] SY9F � �s sr- ,R.V !7nY 2001 h+\4'-SD!&9, w. :228 ° KEY MAP HB- I: 0'-5' b s DIESEL iF,-: SrA9: 1011 _'n.gl \1l\'-tti i'1.3, 0rir.rv..0 NA g (DIESEL) / 2 S SEA-3 SI.M) 30,--3 NAR7 \tl•J-Af) IY.2V 1&.13 ::.37 Illl-: SI.uR 30.1.1 :ISI '57 41 3Y:4 16.72 :.S: ITw-J in 0. 2+.,8 2L13 Gb,-2 3P 31 1t89 22.42 / °•5, � LEGEND G7{., 3931 IY.IR 20.15 SEA-1 71 77 G-r Aa 303) re.,5 z0.a sr,-2 _ l9A / S CB Concrete Bound / ♦ Air Sparging Point "A • Existing Monitor Well uu i / TB / • Proposed Monitor Well �i°'Vr w•Ttl. T.U.' m:r.° s,1,'3. vi•,Ff. / G7.Ad 311.21 IP II !0.1! ,S 49,F. h+\Vds 3SW 16.91 220.5 Existing Testaest rig s i0'r. h+m-sc 3A.w lov l9s 03I^, s+W-iD isa Ia.R4 z-l0 U21`1 0 / Proposed Test Boring A, l :S.q, 19.1a 1^An .\I,l'l-:N,Ni. i,m-,t4 39,20 14,,5 IP.83 1-411 _ 17,Q :.18 • Infection Point ® Area of Staining n+wvn;9.2n w.0 19.R° r.,;Aa 3021 I°95 n.29 - -] / / D Diesel ,R3, 25n G Gasoline 2zw Q` GW Groundwater v, srA-2 30.92 7.94 .3,nA HW-3• Q �a� G% ;o;l IR.m 23.>x h,l\:-, SEA Installations by SEA Consultants,Inc. GZ{-1 .Y„ r 31 Q • �rA / AST Aboveground Storage Tank :3.09 ,\nc-, ,v 5o 2M1.58 229: SEA-3 cacao UST Underground Storage Tank oral-SD sin, ISSI 1,.13 Former Location ( ) P GZA GZA,Inc.,Consultants mwoe 39-0 1M1.1u 23.10 5 ASTs(Diesel) OW Observation Well hl"•r,t13920 JM 23.21 GROUNDWATER WELL GAUGING (Removed 1986) ® Area of Soil Impact>S3/GW-1 - Existing".n � rrvE oe DATE:I1/IS/06.I1/16/06 TIME:9:30 AM TIDE:N/A Steamship Authority ® Area of Groundwater Impact>GW-I O y5' n+\l'I.1.Rs l T"iOR Monitor Wells O TB-3 rs s7•E WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. S.W.L. FLOW VECTOR / A1W-511 3R.94 nos 1.99 123" MW-5S 38.99 17.61 21.38 21.113 M hlw,:D 3920 M,5 21.°s MW-5D 38.94 17.55 21.39 II OZA.2 3^J1 18.20 21.11 ZONE "All GZAa 3Y.57 IA.S: 21.05 MW-6S R 39.20 17.75 21.45 67{.I Wr!' 17.0 2133 OHO `7 nw-5 UkQ0 D,y .1r MW-6D 39.20 17.73 21.57 11,1n-3 0, um nnE GZA-1 139.24 17.62 121.62 /a T 1i41- T"° GZA-2 39.31 17.79 21.52 HW-2• ooO�Lcw \ / M"Ss :all- 17,u5 2,.",. iI'u'E rUx ay / n+w:m 3&0, n.0 II5' SEA-1 48.37 26.07 22.30 AIW��g 19.M 17.27 21.93 S - Existin h4K.11 39:n li.l3 z1.Ys SEA-2 50.92 28.45 22.47 1C P 17-1-1 31" ir..91 2 11 Former Location - 6%A-2 31rJ1 11.33 21o11 U5T(Kerosene) , '\� °�pv ZA-3 fAN-1 ,A.Si 2d IP 21n5 A1w-3 4&0.S J.52 n s, ENIStin -- MWJ A-5o 2z:+ 5ept,c Tank SE-2- �� r h�02c PLAN $PJ,-1 A1137 111.,O 1 2 0 1 Sr{-2 M2 :R.119 21R] ZONE II �- adingDoc Scalel"=40' o MW 3 w� Existing / Sump °1. ,.- 1 i1° ,al vrrn). (bri) Dry Well . � �l Nav or Formerly _ hw-5S1311- ts.IA 2".A1 c act TB-10 loading Racks GZA-2 5? Concrete Gasoline<GW-1) AIW,IS 39111 11823 20°7 ParPng _ GZA-: 3931 15.3n 21.1.1 SEA 4 W ,9 0' 7_.ZA-3 13- 20a7 SEA-1 6;4 :1 03 60catio0 sr_A-2 N.92 29.115 :v0 hn M -65 De st ed and 0arape •I' f 411IL placed vnth -65(R) TB-14 on OI/27/06 SEA SB-1 MW-6 SIR)&D st'n (Gasoline GW-I) Uei �r°4 (Shallow Onn ly) PASSIVE SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION(SVE)/SPARGE DETAIL TB-9 Not To Scale �j PEV151014 3/2/07:Added GW Gauging I I/06,Add A5-1 Detail. RO S-I la= o REVISION 1 1102/06:Added Test Bonngs 14-18. SPARGE POINT SEA-I ZONE 11 CII .-_ �`� TO BIO-VENTING a BG5----•-• MW-1 (Diesel) _ F REVISION 09/05/06:Added Test Bonngs;Groundwater Data. SYSTEM MANAFOLD Cat REGENATIVE (Ezisting) - Catch® Existing Basin Project: I I BLOWER EPH>GW-I(1996-2000) Basin •1Ces �� HUBBARD OIL COMPANY, INC. BENTONITE PLUG -� 5VE B-35 @ I BG5 ....... I 1/4'GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE INTERPRETED AREA O F / Attn:Evelyn Read, P.0.Box 10,Hyannis,MA 02601 5VEB-3D@23-5G5 •••••.• Title: COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION 25'BG5 @ GW •-Y-• a+Od"o e�$+ * 26'BG5 @ GW -Y-. GROUNDWATER IMPACT TB-13#* PHASE V-REMEDY OPERATION STATUS ° OXYGEN RELEASE COMPLOUND ° °p MW-5 S&D 33&51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA-RTN 4-0824 (0PC)BARRIER AS-I @ 35'BG5........... ° °O P NIO555CREEN .........5EA-I @32'BG5 / (5ha01neOnly)w I) BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. / ENGINEERING,ENVIRONMENTAL,&SURVEYING SERVICES / J / 1573 MAIN STREET,P.O.BOX 1667 BREWSTER,MA 02361 PHONE:(508)896-6630 FAX:(508)896-4687 DATE SCALE BY CHECK JOB NUMBER AutOCAD LT/D/A ENVIRONMENTAUHUBBARD OIL BROOr5 RD/3489RO5-I(3-I-07).DWG 03/16/06 As Noted JTW/e DCB B002-3490 i Bamstable, IDENTIFIED SOIL IMPACT(>S-1/GW-1) MA Reference Site Plan by SEA Consultants,Inc. �R Cambridge,MA Scale 1"=50' a o ZONE"A" [65'L X 50'W X 27D] / Reference Site Plan for Robie's Refrigeration TB-4: T-8' bgs(DIESEL) RAO by Horsley&Witten,Inc. o ppad TB-1 I: 3'-27 bgs(DIESEL) / u LOCUS ZONE"B" [65'L X 45-W X 28'D] / 562� l nou h i SEA-1(SB): 1'-24'bgs(GASOLINEMIESEL) 2 En, SEA-SB-3: I'-15'bgs(GASOLINFJDIESEL) TB-2 F nOux a TB-6: 15'-28'bgs(GASOLINE) / / ss9� S ZONE"C" [15'L X IO-15'W X 5'D] KEY MAP HB- 1: 0'-5' bgs(DIESEL) + �'b SS�$ TB-I / 6�nS209O LEGEND �s O CB Concrete Bound • Air Sparging Point HW-3 • qQ3 / • Existing Monitor Well �oa6 Existing Test Boring ♦ �¢-T / Existing ORC Injection Points Q SEA-3 O SEA Installations by SEA Consultants,Inc. T Qya�° AST Aboveground Storage Tank OFo men toe Leon 5 Asrs(o.r:: UST Underground Storage Tank (Removed.986) Q GZA GZA,Inc.,Consultants OT OW Observation Well Existing '/n �� n/ Steamship Authority -CiJ + `� Monitor Wells Q a� TB-3 v / e° aT p II II Engm�red Barrier) / \ 0(Pro / ed m Q 12 BARN5TABLE MAHER WELL i Ov / FIELD 300'± TO PL Hw-2 • e� Z � • EA-2 Emsbng �-1 Ce spool Fo�zr Le.-rw:tun— u5T > Vic° ZA-3 / � a /'/ y (EwSb Ga`F' v MW-2 Septic Tank / A� SEA SB-^_ TB-5 A INTERPRETED o 0 3O PLAN 60 90 ZONProE Eppo ecl 8II GW IMPACT / Loading Dock MW-3 Exi9ting Engineered Barrier) A SB_ >GW-1 Sump SCALE I"=30' ' Dry Well F .ta- la.d ry Pic: / }II�14 TSA4` v O`t'rf r TB-10 TB 8 �y�B--o T GZA-2 5�t' Fa tin •a -1 d9/08) ROS-I LO?d Vvs k Concrete J B- OW-5 REV1510N 3/1&09:Noted A5-1 is 5u5pended,Added bar scale.6 edited title block. Parkln9 �SVJ B-,4 S/ T GZA-I -. •� A-I / PEV1510N 9/04108:Added OP.0,n/ect,on points,TBs 6c,8c,I Ic. TB 's SEA -4 6 r1' REV15ION 3121108:Added graphic scale.Pursed btle block S V, PEV1510N 9/5/07:Added TB-GB,Tli<TB-I 1 B:Labeled proposed engineered bamers. REVISION 8/3/07: .moved hatching,gauging,detail.and—ed. .uarant TB-7 REV1510N 7/1 1/07:Added GW Gauging 5/07.R—sed Zones'. TB- SEA SB-I 14 MW-6 S(R)&D REV15ION 3/2/07:Added GW Gauging I I/06,Add A5-1 Detail. Ex15bna B-1 P PEV1510N 1 1/02106:Added Test Bongs 14-18. Fuel 01 =_ AST REV15ION 09/05/06:Added Test Bongs:Groundwater Data. TB-9+ QP' Project: HUBBARD OIL COMPANY, INC. J Attu:Evelyn Read, P.0.Box 10,Hyannis,MA 02601 ZONE 110 / rj0� Title: COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION PHASE V-STATUS REPORT M W-I Gas n G4`�' 33&51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA-RTN"824 BEN NETT�Ce59p o NETT ENVIRONMENTAL BasinASSOCIATES, INC. / LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS,ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS, GEOLOGIST,SANITARIANS 1573 MAIN/ STREET,P.O.BOX 1743,BREWSTER,MA 02361 PHONE:(SOM)896.1706 —bennea<o.com FAX:(508)896-5109 TB-13 DATE SCALE BY CHECK JOB NUMBER MW-5 S&D AutoCAD LT/D/A ENVIRONMENTAUHUB15APO OIL,BROOK5 RD/349OP05-1(3.I A.M),pWG 03/16/06 As Noted ]TW/e DCB B002-3490 Barnstable, IDENTIFIED SOIL IMPACT(>S-1/GW-1) Reference Site Plan by SEA Consultants,Inc. MA / Cambridge,MA Scale 1"=50' o Reference Site Plan for Robie's Refrigeration �&2 pyas . ZONE"A" [65'L X 50V X 27'D] / RAO by Horsley&Witten,Inc. o LOCUS TB-4: 3'-8' bgs(DIESEL) / TB-II: 3'-27'bgs(DIESEL) ZONE"B" [65'L X 45-W X 28'D] / ss2�/cy no h n i SEA-1(SB): I'-24'bgs(GASOLINM ESEL) + / 23 a a E„ one SEA-SB-3: I'-15'bgs(GASOLBQE/DIESEL) / TB-2 S Ouse Roo TB-6: 15'-28'bgs(GASOLINE) / sys 9 n ZONE"C" [15'L X 10-I5'W X 5'D1 ° KEY MAP HB- 1: 0'-5' bgs(DIESEL) TB-1 / c�0 sQO9� LEGEND �s o CB Concrete Bound ♦ Air Sparging Point HW-3 ♦ yQ' ♦ Existing Monitor Well + Existing Test Boring ♦ 2� / O Existing ORC Injection Points SEA-3 SEA Installations by SEA Consultants,Inc. Q a'� v0 AST Aboveground Storage Tank OQ- Former Lo-tion UST Underground Storage Tank 5 A5r5(Diesel) �i (Removcd 1986) OO Consultants OW Observation We Existing n' Steamship Authority O,1iJ 4�° TB bi 3 \ / Monitor Wells C Oau ZONE "All = / (Propo5e/d\ Engineered Barrier) \ XJ Ov HH-1R <rT13�1� \� Q a TB-12 + S\Y. 2 J Off/ HW 2 ♦ ray Tiiri SVL B I IC*m�- ♦SEA-2 &sdng 0 Ce spool Former to-do. y� LJ5T(Kero5ene) �> ,° � Forma T ZA3 Pxk / (Existing) Gam " MW-2 PLAN b" sep is Tank ZONE11 " SEA SB-2 TB-5 Scale V=30' B Ensd. ♦ \ j ftopo5ed Pumping Sy� / Loa Dock Mw-3` Exntng Engineered Barrier) Dry Well Existing Q2 loadin HB e R T�-SA +g Rack TB-10 TB-S+, ' B-3 I GZA-2 9P Former � Loading Rack`• .9 ROS_1 a OW-5� �7 Concrete ofl B Parking \e ' S ♦ A-1 Q GZA-1 / REVISION 9/04/D8:Added ORC injection points,TBs 6c,8c,I I c. S � TB- ,y SEA �+ 1 / d_ REVISION 3/21p8:Added graphic s- evi le,Rxd title bock .-.i07� Former Location 3�� REV1510N 9/5107:Added TB-6B,TB-8B,4 TB-1 I B;labeled proposed engmcered bamers. `� 6 ASTN5rs(Gaso dKerosex) REVISION 8/3/07:Removed hatching, gauging,detml,and IdSacd. NNAA • � �-s—16 (Removed 199 - 995) Garage TB-7* � PEV151014 7/1 1,07:Addcd GW Gauging 5A07.Pevse4'2on-'. T-1 REVISION 3/2/07:Added GW Gauging 1 I/06,Add A5-1 Dctad. SEA SB-1 MW-6 S(R)&D G:stinq HB-1 RtV15lON I ip2/06:Added Test Borings 14-I8. Fuei Ol A 0.5T I �� �.cr REVISION 09/OSN6:Added Test Bonngs;Groundwater Data. Project: TB-9 HUBBARD OIL COMPANY, INC. Attn:Evelyn Read, P.0.Box 10,Hyannis,MA 02601 Title: COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION ZONE "C" PHASE V-REMEDY OPERATION STATUS 33&51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA-RTN 4-0824 MW-1 `a n BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL Basin / Bs.® �1tiCnessp 1 ASSOCIATES, INC. / LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS,ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS, GEOLOGIST,SANITARIANS 1573 MAIN STREET,P.O.BOX 1743,BREWSTER,MA 02361 <ane PHONE:(509)396-1706 _bae o0in FAX:(50S)894-S 109 TB•13 DATE SCALE BY CHECK I JOB NUMBER MW-5 S&D AutoCAO LT/D/A ENVIRONMENTALMLIBBARD OIL BROOKS RD/349ORO5-I(9-4-08).DWG' 03/16/06 As Noted JTW/e DCB B002-3490 Bamstable, MA �2 RPa�� o'0� LOCUS 1 no h a a f Ro „cruse RoaO D Railroad Easement KEY MU v U U A �cv � CD Proposed CO ~W a Area of `� F Surficial i v �0/ Soil Robies Refrigeration Remova " Building �!� A' Impacted Soils ORC- Advanced Oxygen Barrier V Dissolved- Phase hydrocarbon Plume LEGEND: ® Asphalt/Sub-grade CROSS-SECTION F CS-1 Revised 3/21/08:Added graphic scales Revised title block. Sand Horizontal Scale 1t`=10t Project: HUBBARD OIL COMPANY, INC. Gravelly Sllty Sand Vertical Scale 111—51 Ti .Attn:Evelyn Read, P.O.Box 10,Hyannis,MA 02601 0 — tle: GEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION ® Impacted Soils 33&51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA-RTN 4-0824 BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ° 10 2O 30 ASSOCIATES, INC. Dissolved- Phase Groundwater Impact SCALE I"=10' LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS,ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS, 0 5 10 15 GEOLOGIST,SANITARIANS 1573 MAIN STREET,P.O.BOX 1743.BREWSTER.MA 07.361 5(:AI.F. I"=5 PRONE:(508)896-1106 wuw.bennencvcom FAX:(508)996-5109 DATE SCALE BY CHECK I JOB NUMBER AutoCAD LLD/A ENVI.RONMENTAURUBBARD OIL BROOKS RD/3490GW.re 3-21-08.DWG 09/05/07 As Noted JTW/f DCB B002-3490 Barnstable, Reference Site Plan by SEA Consultants,Inc. MA Cambridge,MA Scale V=50' o u Reference Site Plan for Robie's Refrigeration m> ag' ' RAO by Horsley&Witten,Inc. �2 pyad 0 0� LOCUS no h is Oi23 2 .a E in Ro TB-2 / 3 Noose Road S9� OS' D �9g �9ro n KEY MAP � a sass. TB-I 2� LEGEND v10 '�iv O CB Concrete Bound "Is.Se 1 ♦ Air Sparging Point HW-3 ♦ y� /, s,v 6b ♦ Existing Monitor Well \Aaa �Oj s * Existing Test Boring ♦ ¢� j" SEA Installations by SEA Consultants,Inc. Q SEA-3 O AST Aboveground Storage Tank O� Former laonon UST Underground Storage Tank 5 ASTs(Dense" / GZA GZA,Inc.,Consultants (Removed 19BG) OO %" OW Observation Well Existing Steamship Authority `C Monitor Wells O� TB-3 O "IIU ZONE "A" ems, j OO / a TB=12 HB-18 TB Q �' � SVE -2 HW-2 • L� T -1 B-11 SVE AA.'�\ •SEA-2 Exisnng P TB-.IIA 0j' Ce s o01 Former Location U5T(Kerosene) Zp-3 n qA Fo mer loading Rack � (Exi9ting) Dam MW-2 Exstng � i�+ Septic Tank h��� PLAN qq SEASB-2 TB-5 • ZONE 11U A ing5g Sum Scale1"=30' Pumping Systc Loading Dock MW-3 E,W B_3 P Dry Well Existing -8B r w Loading Rack HB 1z TB-SA 'SS�, Fi , Ott TB-10 TB-8 �LSY\E B-3 S6D GZA-2 a 9? Loading Rack /�\� W 17 I Concrete ( 1 �m`�`.� B OW-5 Parking \ \V\4`S%D� ♦ A l G�I z4 j$ SEA -4=��\6 B=6B TB-6 H Former Location -�HB-16'� G a5TN5T's(Gasoi eJKero9ene) (Removed 199 - 995) Gsra9e TB-7� / A'(Refer ro Site Plan CS-I) SEA SB-I / MW-6 S(R)&D IfB-I GW-1 tin EJi9 Fuel Oil rh / pa Revised 3/21/08,Added graphic scales Revised title block. TB-9+ ' I /' Project: HUBBARD OIL COMPANY, INC. Attn:Evelyn Read, P.0.Box 10,Hyannis,MA 02601 ZONE "C" / �' Title` SITE-SPECIFIC GROUNDWATER FLOW 33&51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA-RTN 4-0824 catch % eats® t'Ge99POI W9n BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL v ' ASSOCIATES, INC. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS,ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS, GEOLOGIST,SANITARIANS / 0 30 GO 90 1573 MAIN STREET,P.O.BOX 1743,BREWSTER,MA 02361 PHONE:(508)896-1706 vnvw kanenr— FAX:(508)896-5109 / TB-13 $CALL I"=30' DATE SCALE BY CHECK JOB NUMBER MW-S S&D AA.CAO LT)D/A ENVIRONMENTAUHUBBAW OIL 19ROOK5 RW3490GW.rev3-21-09.OwC 9/5/�7 As Noted JTW/f DCB B002-3490 Barnstable, IDENTIFIED SOIL IMPACT(>S-1/GW-1) Reference Site Plan by SEA Consultants,Inc. MA Cambridge,MA Scale 1"=50' g ZONE"A" [65%X 50'W X 27'D] // Reference Site Plan for Robie's Refrigeration °e RAO by Horsley&Witten,Inc. 2 poad TB-4: 3'-8' bgs(DIESEL) o LOCUS TB-1 I: 3'-27 bgs(DIESEL) / g� ZONE"B" [65'L X 45-W X 28'D] / s62� ^o h SEA-1(SB): I'-24'bgs(GASOLINE/DIESEL) + �2s E me SEA-SB-3: I'-15'bgs(GASOLINEIDIESEL) TB-2 2 house Roaa TB-6: 15'-28'bgs(GASOLINE) ss9°P °S n ZONE"C" [15'L X 10-15'W X 5'D] 0 9g 2 HB- 1: 0'-5' bgs(DIESEL) s KEY MAP TB-1 / sFOSQOs� LEGEND �-3 Ea CB Concrete Bound A Air Sparging Point HW-3 • ayQ§ / ♦ Existing Monitor Well Boa + Existing Test Boring ♦ ¢-T SEA Installations by SEA Consultants,Inc. Q SEA-3 ��rA O� ' AST Aboveground Storage Tank O� Former Location �a V UST Underground Storage Tank 0 5 A5re(0-1) GZA GZA,Inc.,Consultants (Removed 198G) Q OW Observation Well Existing ' n0� . Steamship Authority 'CiJ + `C Monitor Wells OO a� TB-3 / a` ZONE "A" (Propo5eci n( Engineered Barrier) O ICJ i u O HB-18 ( TB�� � Q a T8-12 SVE 2@ J v � m Q \ J O HW-2 • e""'y T I rB-i l SVE IJ m •SEA-2 Existing A �Ce spool Former Location ^ U5T(Kerosene) c'Ov A / for Y ZA-3 / ¢j,S'a Loading Rack / (Existing) 0a'd' MW-2 Existing Septic Tank H 11 SEA SB-2 TB-5 yo PLAN �\ ZONE B Existing Scale l"=30' • \ (Prop05ed Pumping 5yste / LoSumg Dock MW-3 &,sting Engineered Barrier) A B_3 F Dry Well Existing B-8B Loading Rack HB )i TB-8A OlbrF TB-10 TB_g ��YI B-3 S/b GZA-2 Former Loadmg Rack H�I' ,. Concrete J m� B OW-5 Parking '� ( S/ ♦' A I GZA-1 ROS-1 / 4 � SEA -4*\� 'Tt5-g / REVISION 3/21/08:Added graphic scale.Revised title block t5 u TB A\ Former Location �q REVISION 9/5/07:Added TB-GB,TB-8B,E TB-I I B;labeled proposed engmcered bamcn. HB 16 G A5TN5r5(Gaso e/Kerosene) RLV1510N&3/07:Removed hatchet detach re and srzed. (Removed 199 - 995) g,gauging, Gga9e TB-7+ REV15ION 711 1107:Added G%V Gauging 5/07.TB-14 4eviscd Zones'. SEA SB-1 REVISION 3/2/07 MW-6 S(R)&D :Added GW Gaugin b g I I/OG,Add A5-1 Ocil. W- Emstmqq -1 PEV15ION 11/02J°G:Added Test Bor-g.14-18. Fuel oa REV15ION 09/05/OG:Added Test Borings;Groundwater Data. TB-9+ Project: HUBBARD OIL COMPANY, INC. Attn:Evelyn Read, P.0.Box 10,Hyannis,MA 02601 ZONE HCn Title: COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION PHASE V-REMEDY OPERATION STATUS MW 1 33&51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA-RTN 4-0824 Latch E,s Catch- NETT ENVIRONMENTAL ® xting Basin BEN -- Basin occ55p of ASSOCIATES, INC. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS,ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS, GEOLOGIST,SANITARIANS O 30 60 90 1573 MAIN STREET,P.O.BOX 1743,BREWSTER,MA 02361 PHONE(508)8961706 wuw.hnnrcrrc:x.eom FAX:puff)896-5109 TB-13 .SC:AI.F I'A30' DATE SCALE BY CHECK JOTB-;W ER MW-$ &D AutoCAD LTMIA ENVIRONMENTAUnUBBARD OIL BROOK5 RD/349OR05-1(3-21-08).DWG 03/16/06 As Noted JTW/e DCB B002-3490 (2015 Google Aerial Image of Site) --f PROJECT NAME: Aboveground Storage Tank 1 r � (AST)Removal DRAWING TITLE: Figure 2: Site Plan .�� LOCATION: 33 Brooks Road, Hyannis,MA DATE: d � November 14,2016 PROJECT ID: RBOC-1602 SCALE: NONE y r '• ��� Wi . T } Confirmatory Sample Collection Area: / Green Seal Environmental,Inc 114 State Road,Building B TANK-B-NORTH (0-6") Sagamore Beach,MA 02562 Tel: (508) 888 6034 Fax: 508 888— 1506 .:v. www.gseenv.com Former 106,000-gallon AST '.\?;ONMF�T ' ;v Es1. z GREEN SEAL 2X0 1997 Confirmatory Sample Collection Area: ti TANK-B-SOUTH (0-6") AOda Barnstable, GROUNDWATER WELL GAUGING MA DATE: 10/02/02 TIME: 11:00 AM TIDE: O S O�+ REt. ORD ` 19 WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. S.W.L. FLOW VECTOR 7 W \\ MW-1 48.84` 28.14 20.70 S 520 E Ni a� LOCUS o �" MW-2 48.84 28.13 20.71 (128°) MW-3 48.0$ 26.60 21.48 ' � anon ference Site Plan by SEA Consultants,Inc. h / Cambridge,MA Scale I"=50' House Roa SEA-1 48.37 27.66 2Q.71 / g , � in d Reference Site Plan for Robie's Refrigeration o Ro SEA-2 50.92 30.11 20.81 a RAO by Horsley&Witten,Inc. SEA-3 51.60 30.70 20.90 1 D / 1 DATE: 10/23/02 TME: TIDE: c -TYPICAL KEY MAP WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. S.W.,.L. FLOW VECTOR / TEST BOR - (?NITOR L MW-1 48.84 28.16 20,68 S 620 E / RESERVE AS UIltE �" LEGEND MW-2 48.84 29.14 20.70 (118°) J - -- / El CB Concrete Bound MW-3 48.08 26.67 21.41 • Existing Monitor Well MW-4 49.50 28.74 2Q.76 / -2 } ��TB A Proposed Monitor Well / Existing Test Boring SEA-1 48.37 27.68 20.69 / Proposed Test Boring SEA-2 50.92 30.11 20.81 / X Proposed ORC Injection Point Area of Staining SEA-3 51.60 30.73 20.87 1 O / / D Diesel HW-2 51.65 30.14 21.51 ��'` �j GW Groundwater HW_3• Q See Schematic Details Q G Gasoline HW-3 50.01 28.48 21.53 Q'- (Sheet 2 of 2) �` Q- , SEA Installations by SEA Consultants,Inc. GZA-2 39.31 19.16 20.15 O • 01 O AST Aboveground Storage Tank n SEA-3 ��� n' UST Underground Storage Tank GZA-3 39.57 19.45 20.12 `C Former Location (brl) �� yC GZA GZA,Inc.,Consultants 5 A5T'5(Dic!"C OW Observation Well DATE: 11/04/02 TIME: TIDE: �v (Removed 198G) ' C� Area of Soil Impact>S3/GW-1 WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. S.W.L. FLOW VECTOR Existing Steamship AuthorityTB-�3 Area of Groundwater Impact>GW-1 Monitor Wells 0 GZA-1 39.24 19.11 20.13 S 490 E 0 O MW-5S 38.99 19.21 19.78 (131°) �a11-4 MW-5D 38.94 19.14 19.80 6NE "All / � �39.20 19.35 19.85 MW-6D 39.20 19.34 19.86 ti d` TB- DATE: 04/24/03 TIME: TIDE: HW-2• WELL 'T.O.C. D_T.W. S.W.L. FLOW VECTOR m ` •S GZA-2 393 EA-2 Proposed MW 1 I6.03 23.28 � Ez+stin I} • �--� spo , GZA-3 39.57 16.33 23.24 Former Location (Dig a• U5T(Kerosene) ZA-3 MW-SS 38.99 15.90 23.09 I - (brl) MW-5D 38.94 15.81 23.13 Oa>� ., MW-2 • �...... , Ex!5tmg rl 0 MW-6S 39.20 16.10 23.10 5eptic Tank / SEA SB-2 � ) �c MW-6D 39.20 15.99 23.21 TB-5 � adm Doc nN t - • ��.� I:xis,Yng ZV I:V ti i Sump MW-3 Dry Wei - DATE: 06/03/03 TTW: TIDE: rl *SEA SB-3 � -, Now or Formerly-/, µ YM �'" =10 Loading Racks SVE T-3 S/D „w GZA-2 WELL T.O.C. D.T.W. S.W.L. FLOW VECTOR t �(ya J -8 +i ;� / "' `� Gasoline < GW-1) MW-5S 38.99 15.75 23.24 , Concrete J i . .,.,...... u„ - D i �ar\ SVE T-4 S,'D _.. OGZA 1 MW 5 3894 15.68 23.26 ! j �'s� TB-6A�IW-4 ? • A-1(Gasoline) MW-6S 39.20 15.89 23.31 SEA GDi / x 1 PLAN MW-6D 39.20 15.89 23.31 -Former Lmcat�on """ �'° Scale 1"=40' ' G USA e/KGrosene) GZA-2t39.31 15.93 23.38 Oat�� TB-7 �) (�iemoved 1 2-!995) SEA SB-1 / TB-14 MW-6S&D Exist HB-1 ;` w Q (Gasoline < GW-1) Fuel ( , �o AST (5haiow Only) �c IDENTIFIED SOIL IMPACT >S-I/GW-1 - TB-9 O N E C ° �T ZONE"A" [65'L X 50 X 2T Z 'W D] I+ II TB- 4: 3'-8' bgs(DIESEL) MW-1 (Diesel) RIP-2 TB-11: 3'-27 bgs(DIESEL) (+xist+ng) / Catch _qti �. Catch Existing Basin �` Project: EPH > GW-I (1996-2 Basin® �1Ce5 o � HUBBARD OIL COMPANY INC. ZONE"B" [65'L X 45'W X 28'D] 4/� Attn:Evelyn Raed, P.O.Box 10,Hyannis,MA 02601 SEA-1 (SB): 1'-24'bgs(GASOLINE/DIESEL) INTERPRETED R Title: COMPREHENSIVE .RESPONSE ACTION SEA-SB-3: 1'-15'bgs(GASOLINE/DIESEL) GROUNDWATER (M PANT % / PHASE IV-REMEDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TB-6: 15'-28'bgs(GASOLINE) d/ TB-13 41'°/ MW-5 S D 33&51 Brooks Road,Hyannis,MA-RTN 4-0824 �° % ZONE"B" [15'L X 10-15`W X 5'D] j (Gasoline < GW-1) (5narli�,�,only) BENNETT & OREILLY, INC. HB- 1: 0'- 5' bgs(DIESEL) 4- ENGINEERING,ENVIRONMENTAL,&SURVEYING SERVICES 1573 MAIN STREET,P.O.BOX 1667 BREWSTER,MA 02361 PHONE:(508)896-6630 FAX:(508)896-4687 DATE SCALE BY CHECK I JOB NUMBER s SHEET 1 OF 2 04/24/03 As Noted JTW/e DCB IB002-3490