Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0167 STRAIGHTWAY - Health 167 Straightway Hyannis A = 268 219 ' . i, N 6' e 1, l A TOWN OF BARNSTABLE LGC:,TION If SEWAGE # VILLAGE 1�14e 6 n S ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. Z / C <- / 6 SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY LEACHING FACILITY: (type.) ;e, (size) NO.OF BEDROOMS _t,BUII.DER OR OWNER PERMUDATE: V • `7 . OMPLIANCE DATE: Separation Distance Betwen�e: ,p Maximum Adjusted Grouwn vdate-able'-the Botto f Leaching Facility / Feet Private Water Supply Well d Leaching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet o hing-facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist _ within 300 feet of leaching facility - Feet Furnished by ��'— -- l o Z : , E --- !�' � � —, � �� - � � � ', W ., �, TOWN OF BARNSTABLE 0 3 _ 3a' LOCATION G S� "` f' h • y /� cI SEWAGE # VILLAGE y A., ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. a . SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY S 0 O LEACHING FACILITY: (type) (size) 4..-1 NO. OF BEDROOMS ° BUILDER OR OWNER PERMr'TDATE: OMPLIAN DATE: Separation Distance Between the• n P Maximum Adjusted Groundw to Tab to th Botto of Le ing Facility / Feet Private Water Supply Well and aching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaclun facility) ?� Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of 1pac 'ng05 ,� Feet Furnished by 0 � ,. 1 �� �. / � ' � � , � � - �� .. 1� �. � �. ' � �- � ' ' 3 ` TOWN OF BARNSTABLE • LOCATION �'� n `y�� �" '��•SEWAGE# VILLAGE_ , a S ` ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOTZG Zj INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. /� �— f— S 'f ' SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY LEACHING FACII,ITY: (type) i (size)l NO. OF BEDROOMS 2S BUILDER OR OWNER �» Q PER ITDATE: COMPLIANCE DATE: Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table to the Bottom of Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells exist j O on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of le ng facuity) Feet Furnished by 6 i O N L4 w Ceila,r WAS V&-, it.�tc@.s cy�"vek No. 2W3 3 ----. klA9 11A,"Gu�CQ_ nPjXVVeA (0—MIt Fee 6 0 THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Tp°I Entered in computer: Yes PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION -TOWN OF BARNSTABLE., MAS ACHUSETTS 01ppYication for Zi!5po.5a16petem Construction Permit Application for a Permit to Construct( )Repair(K Upgrade( )Abandon( ) O Complete System ❑Individual Components Location Address or Lot No. s It,7 S�y ` �j f W Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. ©�(o� Assessor's Map/Parcel 2 ._� Y219 ° 167 5 ��f,,�tJet� a:„�,:5°/-/* d2EOP Installer's (Name,Address,and Tel.No. Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No. -To kA f %C.e Z o C C / po �o� S'08-331-192% Ytil � ®a�S s l6Z- 020 8 Type of Building: Dwelling No.of Bedrooms Lot Size sq.ft. Garbage Grinder( ) Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow gallons per day. Calculated daily flow gallons. Plan Date Number of sheets Revision Date Title d Size of Septic Tank `'`� . Type of S.A.S. I`Il' < 35 Description of Soil `�f Sate n✓ �%� S yL f � Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) �'�Q f r ter ' Tip se KsVew- Date last inspected: ' 1 Agreement: The undersigned agrees-to-ensure the constr ction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the pr isions of Title 5 of the iron ental- and not.to place the system in operation until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has be issued by this Boar f.Hea Signed r Date Application Approved by ,� Date 7 3 Application Disapproved for the folio mg reasons Permit No. 7-06 l 31� Date Issued e,3 ti — .Cella, WA-1t q&,rI ces 2g r o � Q Fee ,o n 5N y ArA RC _. THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 'rM Entered in computer: Yes PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION -TOWN OF BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS ZippYication for Migpool *p5tem Construction 3permit Application for a Permit to Construct( )Repair( Upgrade( )Abandon( ) El Complete System ❑Individual Components Location Address or Lot No. WQ (00/ Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. a n`x M , � � (c act _, A P N Assessor's'K /Pl G % Oy 7 i`� arce 2�6 - 2�9 StYG•q�'r�_J0./ H�L1-r,i.r S���- Q ZFiDI Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No. D _Ttk,, h %'tli0 we rpo do,e1�°�r-+R 0 ZOLI 8 So$-335-192(o yes+y�•_oc>$' Type of Building: Dwelling No.of Bedrooms Lot Size sq.ft. Garbage Grinder( ) Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow gallons per day. Calculated daily flow gallons. Plan Date Number of sheets Revision Date Title Size of Septic Tank 4 S°Ogal. Type of S.A.S. �`J� )c 35 x " e.ae,4 Description of Soil 9t- 3 All, 0-11 S i o S. Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) Date last,inspected: 1:t Agreement: . xy The undersigned agrees to-ensure the construction and maintenance'of.;.tYe afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the pr tstons of Title 5 of the Envtron ental Cade and not to place the°system in operation until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has be•n issued by this Boar�d�.df.Hea . Signed // / / �� ��� Date Application Approved by zI v f Date 7 3 Application Disapproved for the foll�0 ing reasons Permit No. z-UO 1�r OKa Date Issued to 3 THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS Certificate of Compliance THIS IS TO CERTIFY,that the On-site.Sewage Disposal System Constructed( ) Repaired X)Upgraded( ) Abandoned( )by at Rod 'r'u:ak+w tV has been construct d in/accordance a;. with the provisions-offitle 5 and the for Disposal System Construction Permit No. 200 3-13 9 dated D 3 Installer Designer The issuance of s p it sfiaThnot be construed as a guarantee that the syste Date C� 3 Inspector V No.Z OD3" I3F Fee ✓C/ THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC HEALTHDIVISION - BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS Mi!6pozal *pgtem Com9truction 3permit Permission is hereby granted to Construct( )Repair Upgrade( )Abandon( ) System located at I(o'7 Is`-1_0"`sl,+WAW {L e„h,s j and as described in the above Application for Disposal System Construction Permit. The applicant recognizes his/her duty to comply with Title 5 and the following local provisions or special conditions. Provided: Constru ion ust be completed within three years of the date of this pe Date:_. 03 Approved by TOWN OF BARNSTABLE 7 ao . /LOCATION' Z-6? :7 �-'/- 02 !2 SEWAGE # VILLAGE Alli Z ASSESSOR'S MAP &LOT INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. i C- c- 339 / pZG i SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY LEACHING FACILITY: (type) (size) NO.OF BEDROOMS �� 3 " a s BUILDER OR OWNER e s ✓ �''JJ/ i r� - PERMTTDATE: V. .. OMPLIANCE DATE: Separation Distance Betw L;e ' 0 .Maximum Adjusted Groundthe Botto f Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply WetlFacility (If any wells existon site or within 200 feeecility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of leaching facility " Feet Furnished by ,o yew I M i 167`Straightway _ Hyannis; MA 02601 October 142005 Town of Barnstable Yankee Survey Consultants Health Division P.O. Box 265 200 Main Street 40 Industry Road Hyannis, MA 02601 Marston Mills, MA 02648 To Both Addressees: In March and April of 2003,we worked with Sam White from the Town's Health Division and Paul Merriweather from Yankee Survey Consultants to design a new Title 5 Septic System on our property listed above. This was quite an ordeal for us and continues to be at this time. Let me explain. When our old system failed back in 2003 and we learned that we would need to replace it with a Title 5 Septic System, we faced many obstacles presented to us from both the Town of Barnstable and Yankee Survey Consultants. First,we were informed that a new system could not be installed at the site of the old system in the back yard because our back yard slopes down and because there is a pond 1/4 mile away. Therefore, we were informed that a cement vault measuring 14 X 35 was the only solution. This vault,we were told,would run.along the side of our property up to the existing driveway and require a pump. We said no to this horrible design, as we are sure you would,too. Second,we were informed that we could go with an electric pump system in the back yard that would reroute the liquid and solid waste from the back yard to a new leeching field in the front yard. We.were told that the.leeching field definitely could not stay in the back yard. Because Straightway loses power so frequently, we said no to this design as well. Third, we asked the Town and Yankee if we could raise our back yard up to an appropriate measurement, 2 or 3 feet, by bringing in fill.. Then, it would perk for sure. Unfortunately for us, Sam White and Paul Merriweather said this could not be done because run off from our higher back yard would impact our neighbors' yards. (If you need proof of any of this,we still have Yankee's 3 design which cost over$1,500.) Sadly for us, we had no other option but to reroute our entire plumbing system in the basement from the back of the house to the side yard in order to accommodate a new septic system and leeching field which is now located in the front yard of our property. This ordeal was not only time-consuming but quite expensive, as we are sure you can imagine: $18,000+by the time everything was finished. We write this letter now because my next-door neighbors,who basically have the same size/same sloping property as ours,have had their Title 5 Septic System put right back in their back yard, which is what we wanted to do, at a cost of$10,000. And guess how they accomplished this feat: by raising their entire back yard up 3 feet, perhaps higher. Can you imagine that? If you think we are exaggerating, step onto their deck located at 177 Straightway and look down into their bulkhead. You will see how high their back yard has been risen. No rerouting of the plumbing system; no tearing up of the entire yard; no angst and anxiety on the part of the property owners. A simple case of bringing in enough fill.to raise the yard up to accommodate a Title 5 Septic System. Just what we wanted to do -but we were shot down. We write this letter now because you,the Town, approved and inspected this design for .my neighbors but not for us. You also agreed to that discrepancy in height between my neighbor's back and side yard and ours,a discrepancy that Sam White and Paul Merriweather would not agree to. This we do not understand at all. The implication, we are sure you know, is that we could not do anything to impact our neighbors' properties, but they could do as they wished with no problem. This saddens us to know of the inconsistencies here. We thought you should know just how unfair this seems to us. We thought you should also know that we have never had standing water in our back yard or in our basement,and we certainly hope this doesn't occur now. However, if it does happen that water runs off into our yard and/or into our basement, at least you will have a record of it in your file and a remedy up your sleeve. We await your professional courtesy and comments. Sincerely, Maureen and Jim McLaughlin I 167 Straightway Hyannis,MA 02601 November 1, 2005 1 Donald , . arias Board..", altli --a To Barnstable 367 � St: ca H "?is,MA 02601 Dear Mr. Desmarias: Your kind receptionist gave us your name as the person from the town who inspects not only new Title 5 Septic System plans but also.the finished project as well. You should have received our previous letter, a copy of which is enclosed, about the problems we are encountering from my neighbor's new Title 5 System. We were hoping to hear back from you but received no response. Please read that letter again so that you remember why we wrote in the first place. You will,see that our fears are grounded and valid. We are now writing again to inform you what has occurred since we wrote that letter. On two separate occasions,rain run-off from my neighbor's yard,which has been raised with fill and is now significantly higher than our yard,.has saturated our back yard to the point where we needed to don boots in order to walk through it. You will see from my previous letter that we always had a dry back yard with no saturation,no standing water, and no water in the basement. We now fear that the water saturation in our yard during extended periods of rain will eventually make its way to the basement. We phoned our good neighbors in New York about the water accumulating in our yard. They told us that even they thought this might be a problem. They said they were sure it was inspected by the town and were going to look into°it. We then called the town ourselves and.were told that you were that inspector. We have a difficult time believing you completed a satisfactory inspection of.my neighbors' yard, when the town's inspector,just a few short years ago,would not let us raise our back yard because it would negatively impact our neighbors. Did you actually.go to the site? Did you look at the property boundary and see the shear drop that has been created between the two yards? We think not, for if you did,you would have never given your approval. My neighbor's yard,two to three`feet higher than our back yard where they meet,is. causing water problems in our yard that we never had. This is going to be an ongoing problem,we know. We are clearly the victims here. y We await your professional courtesy and-response as to how this filled-in yard passed inspection. We also await your response regarding your remedy of stopping the accumulation of water in our back yard. As the town previously told us, "You can't do anything that would impact your neighbors." Sincerely, Maureen and Jim McLaughlin Cc Tom Broderick Samuel B. ld. Go stem i rf 167 Straightway Hyannis,MA 02601 March 27,2003 Sam White Barnstable Board of Health Town Hall Hyannis,MA 02601 Dear Sam: First,I want to thank you for all always calling me back with much-appreciated help and advice. I don't know what I would have done during the past two months without your support. I do want to say a few things,though. This whole Title S undertaking has been one huge nightmare. Due to my naivete,I actually.thought, after I thought I had fully researched the issue and talked to other people who had gone through it,that it would be a simple"take the old system out,put the new one in"project. I couldn't have been more wrong. Here I am-$2,000 later-without a design in hand. I can't believe it. Let me tell you why and share my nightmare with you. When the perk was done in the back yard,and I received the good news that it had passed,I was elated. Then came the bad news- after the engineer's design, of coi_oe: an expensive above-ground vault system,which was totally unacceptable to me and the other two owners of the property. First,they are obtrusive. Second,no one in their right mind,including me,would buy property with this system installed. The other owners and I, for key reasons, declined to accept this system. Next,the engineer designed a second system, and on the day that I paid off his total bill in the amount of$2,000+,I was told this one would be in the front yard. Now I was really excited;this is what we wanted all along. The plans came back,and much to my surprise,the system wasn't in the front yard at all-only the leaching field was. This required that the tank and a$3,000 pump chamber be installed in the back yard with a piping system up the side yard to the front yard leaching system. As the engineer told me,this also meant electrical wiring for the pump, so that every time power dies in the area-and it dies on Straightway quite often- you can't use the toilets! Now I have to ask you, in today's world of technology,who would ever want this system? The other owners and I declined to accept this design as well. After(1)reviewing the situation,(2)talking to residents with vault systems, and(3) residents who declined vault systems and, accordingly, after fighting for their property, "got what they wanted,"I and the other owners decided to have a third design drawn up. I The engineer met me last night to look around in our basement at the plumbing. However,before he came,I tracked down some of the year-round residents on Straightway and found, much to my surprise,only three doors down, neighbors who had their entire system put in their front yard- at a design and perk expense of only$900. The owner of the property was home,told me what he and his installers wanted,and said the plumber had no problem rerouting the plumbing in the basement without a pump because they simply lowered the tank to accommodate that design. He also took me out to his back yard,which he said was a solid six feet lower than the front yard and which is now a beautiful built-in swimming pool.. To make a long story short,the engineer came over, and I took him three houses down to view my neighbor's system. The engineer told me that he would design a system for the front yard but he couldn't say for sure that we would or wouldn't still need an electric pump. Much-to my dismay and the other owners'disgust with this entire project undertaking,we have gone around in circles, and as I mentioned,$2,000 later,we are now awaiting yet another design. I cannot believe the problems we have encountered. The yard is 1.00 by 100, as are most other properties in a two-mile radius(excluding Hyannis Port). Title 5, I believe, is everyone's worst nightmare. Implemented just a short 8 years ago,Title 5 is, I am sure, just another experimental way for the state,towns, and private businesses to make money off people like me who are, in their own way, merely trying to preserve and enhance the beauty of their own property and not devalue it by adding vaults or mounds with white piping sticking out everywhere. As I stated earlier,I do thank you for your support during the past few months. However, I am greatly saddened and disturbed by the sequence of events that I and the other owners have experienced at the hands of experts in the field of Title 5. I hope no other homeowner has to go through what we have been through- and it's not over yet. Enclosed is a copy of a letter sent to my engineer,which is self-explanatory. Sincerely, Maureen McLaughlin 167 Straightway Hyannis,MA 02601 March 24, 2003 Yankee Survey Consultants 40 Industry Road Marston Mills, MA 02648 To Whom It May Concern: - - - - Enclosed-please fnd-mycheck in-the-amount of$1,250 - - - - - - - - - - - I want you to know that, if it weren't for my husband, I would have dismissed your firm and hired another engineering consultant who is an expert in the field of Title 5 design. I cannot help but feel that your firm did not treat us with the professionalism I expected. As you know, I had to call your office every day to find out the status of our situation, and sometimes you did not return my calls. When you did call, I got the feeling that you didn't.know the answers to my questions and didn't care about the desperateness of our situation. Consequently, I talked to other experts in the field who led me to believe that I did not receive the best treatment from your firm. In closing, I do want to say a few things. • We have never had water in our basement or standing water in our backyard, as you seemed to think. You wouldn't even consider allowing us to regrade our backyard to accommodate the Title 5. After all, my neighbor's back yard is higher than ours, so there would have been no water runoff problems into his yard. • When I asked you to come to the house to physically show me the vault system area you designed and to allow me to show you a vault system around the corner on Haven Lane, you said you"didn't see the need for that." It was the Board of Health who, with plans in hand, told me to step out on our deck while they described the vault system to mein detail. It was only then that I realized the negative impact the vault system would have on our property value. Your second design provides for the tank and a pump chamber to be installed in the back yard and a leaching field in the front yard. We never had water in our basement before, and,with your new design, I am confident that it will remain that way. J • We are going to have an electric pump installed in the back yard that pumps water uphill? What happens when we lose power? How much more will our electric bills be as a result of this design? • My entire yard is going to be torn up as a result of this new design. What a shame that the system has to be spread out over the entire yard. • The front yard will not be raised one iota. It will be as flat as it is now. If that is not correct, then I have been misled. Also, there will be no pipe sticking out of my front lawn to release fumes. If there is,then I have been misled again. When our system began to fail back in February, I immediately got on the phone to talk to experts in the field and searched the Internet looking for information about Title 5s. I talked to plumbers and septic companies. I received information from the -Commoriwealtt of Maissachusetts and the town.At the'time,I was confident that the team of professionals we hired would work with us to (1) design the most effective and efficient Title 5; and(2) treat our property and us with respect. Sadly, that has not been the case. If you have any questions or can answer any of my remainingquestions, lease feel free q p to contact me. Sincerely, Maureen McLaughlin I Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services + BekIt1YS'FABL& MAM Thomas F. Geiler,Director Public Health Division Thomas McKean,Director 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4644 Fax: 508-790-6304 March 31, 2003 Mrs. Maureen McLaughlin 167 Straightway Road Hyannis, MA 02601 Dear Mrs. McLaughlin, Thank you for your letter dated March 27, 2003. I am sorry to hear that you continue to experience problems with a septic system design plan for your property. The Director and the other health inspectors at this Office were all advised of the topography and the physical constraint issues at your site. At this time, we are awaiting a stamped engineer plan for a proposed system to be placed in front of your home. It is the engineer's responsibility to design the septic system plan. As you are aware,the Health Division staff does not design septic systems;but we will consult with engineers during the design phase and will ultimately approve or disapprove the proposed septic system design plan. If variances are needed, it will be the engineer's responsibility or the applicant's responsibility to notify the abutters and to apply for variances from the Board of Health(with the exception of foundation setback variances). If you should have any further questions,please feel free to telephone me at 862-4644. Sincerely yours, Samuel White Health Inspector e (167 Straightway Hyannis,MA 02601 March 27,2003 Sam White Barnstable Board of Health Town Hall Hyannis,MA 02601 Dear Sam: First, I want to thank you for all always calling me back with much-appreciated help and advice. I don't know what I would have done during the past two months without your support. I do want to say a few things, though. This whole Title 5 undertaking has been one huge nightmare. Due to my naivete,I actually thought, after I thought I had fully researched the issue and talked to other people who had gone through it, that it would be a simple "take the old system out,put the new one in"project. I couldn't have been more wrong. Here I am-$2,000 later-without a design in hand. I can't believe it. Let me tell you why and share my nightmare with you. When the perk was done in the back yard, and I received the good news that it had passed,I was elated. Then came the bad news - after the engineer's design,of course: an expensive above-ground vault system,which was totally unacceptable to me and the other two owners of the property. First,they are obtrusive. Second,no one in their right mind,including me,would buy property with this system installed. The other owners and I, for key reasons, declined to accept this system. Next,the engineer designed a second system, and on the day that I paid off his total bill in the amount of$2,000+,I was told this one would be in the front yard. Now I was really excited;this is what we wanted all along. The plans came back,and much to my surprise,the system wasn't in the front yard at all-only the leaching field was. This required that the tank and a$3,000 pump chamber be installed in the back yard with a piping system up the side yard to the front yard leaching system. As the engineer told me,this also meant electrical wiring for the pump, so that every time power dies in the area-and it dies on Straightway quite often- you can't use the toilets! Now I have to ask you, in today's world of technology,who would ever want this system? The other owners and I declined to accept this design as well. After(1)reviewing the situation, (2)talking to residents with vault systems, and(3) ` residents who declined vault systems and, accordingly, after fighting for their property, f "got what they wanted,"I and the other owners decided to have a third design drawn up. f l II The engineer met me last night to look around in our basement at the plumbing. However,before he came,I tracked down some of the year-round residents on Straightway and found, much to my surprise, only three doors down, neighbors who had their entire system put in their front yard- at a design and perk expense of only $900. The owner of the property was home,told me what he and his installers wanted, and said the plumber had no problem rerouting the plumbing in the basement without a pump because they simply lowered the tank to accommodate that design. He also took me out to his back yard, which he said was a solid six feet lower than the front yard and which is now a beautiful built-in swimming pool.. To make a long story short,the engineer came over, and I took him three houses down to view my neighbor's system. The engineer told me that he would design a system for the front yard but he couldn't say for sure that we would or wouldn't still need an electric pump. Much to my dismay and the other owners' disgust with this entire project undertaking,we have gone around in circles, and as I mentioned, $2,000 later,we are now awaiting yet another design. I cannot believe the problems we have encountered. The yard is 1.00 by 100, as are most other properties in a two-mile radius (excluding Hyannis Port). Title 5,I believe, is everyone's worst nightmare. Implemented just a short 8 years ago, Title 5 is,I am sure, just another experimental way for the state,towns, and private businesses to make money off people like me who are, in their own way, merely trying to preserve and enhance the beauty of their own property and not devalue it by adding vaults or mounds with white piping sticking out everywhere. As I stated earlier,I do thank you for your support during the past few months. However, I am greatly saddened and disturbed by the sequence of events that I and the other owners have experienced at the hands of experts in the field of Title 5. I hope no other homeowner has to go through what we have been through-and it's not over yet. Enclosed is a copy of a letter sent to my engineer,which is self-explanatory. Sincerely, Maureen McLaughlin 167 Straightway Hyannis, MA 02601 March 24, 2003 Yankee Survey Consultants 40 Industry Road Marstons Mills;,MA 02648 To Whom It May Concern: Eficlowd please find my check in the amount of$1,250. I want.you to know that, if it weren't for my husband, I would have dismissed your firm and hired another engineering consultant who is an expert in the field of Title 5 design. I cannot help but feel that your firm did not treat us with the professionalism I expected. As you know, I had to call your office every day to find out the status of our situation, and sometimes you did not return my calls. When you did call, I got the feeling that you didn't know the answers to my questions and didn't care about the desperateness of our situation. Consequently, I talked to other experts in the field who led me to believe that I did not receive the best treatment from your firm. In closing, I do want to say a few things. • We have never had water in our basement or standing water in our backyard, as you seemed to think. • You wouldn't even consider allowing us to regrade our backyard to accommodate the Title 5. After all, my neighbor's back yard is higher than ours, so there would have been no water runoff problems into his yard. • When Tasked you to come to the house to physically show me the vault system area you designed and to allow me to show you a vault system around the corner on Haven Lane, you said you"didn't see the need for that." It was the Board of Health who, with plans in hand, told me to step out on our deck while they described the vault system to me in detail. It was only then that I realized the negative impact the vault system would have on our property value. • Your second design provides for the tank and a pump chamber to be installed in the back yard and a leaching field in the front yard. We never had water in our basement before, and,with your new design, I am confident that it will remain that way. • We are going to have an electric pump installed in the back yard that pumps water uphill? What happens when we lose power? How much more will our electric bills be as a result of this design? • My entire yard is going to be torn up as a result of this new design. What a shame that the system has to be spread out over the entire yard. • The front yard will not be raised one iota. It will be as flat as it is now. If that is not correct, then I have been misled. Also, there will be no pipe sticking out of my front lawn to release fumes. If there is, then I have been misled again. When our system began to fail back in February, I immediately got on the phone to talk to experts in the field and searched the Internet looking for information about Title 5s. I talked to plumbers and septic companies. I received information from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the town. At the time, I was confident that the team of professionals we hired would work with us to (1) design the most effective and efficient Title 5; and(2)treat our property and us with respect. Sadly, that has not been the case. If you have any questions or can answer any of my remaining questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Maureen McLaughlin 'Town of ljarnsta= PH -h 10 -H q L Department of Regulatory Services r G 2 �,,,�, Public Health Division Date l 7 200 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 DAMU MNA MwM P l d hTime !� Fee Pd. �'0® i •bra •` Data scheduled 3� / /-63 . ' I Soil Suitability Assessment for Sewage Disposal Performed By: s • `t�1 witnessed By: Sa,r1 W1uk ' owner's Name Location Address !lob s1EM; f Address Assessor's Map/Parcd: 2-0'219 Engineers Nsme 5-� Q y� NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIR Telephone 0 Land Use Slopes(-A) a Surface Stones y4v Distances from: Open Water Body 1v o ft Possible et �.,�o.��ft Drinking Water Well ft / ft Drainage Way � � � ft Property Line�_.�.--- Other ft SKETCH:(Street name,dimensions of lot,exact locations of test boles&perc tests,locate wetlands in proximity to holes) . I I i v6 (J 1vU . 1 Parent material(geologic) Depth to Bedrock �:�./A Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in Hole: (o [i` Weeping from Pit Face camel Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater Method Used: Depth Observed standing in obs.hole: n. GrouDeptndwater to soil Adjustmots: in. Depth to weeping from side of obs.hole: in. Grornrdws Adjustment ft Index Well/ Reading Date: Index Well level T— Adj.sector Adj.Groundwater Level_ F 51PZ3.1 bvd:� Observation Time at 9" Hole k I Depth of Perc 'S L•1 Tune at 6" Start Pro-soak Time Q Tune(9"-6) End Pre-soak Rate Min.Mch Site Suitability Assessment' Site Passed Site Failedt Additional Testing Needed(Y/td) Original: Public Health Division Observation Dole Data To Be Completed on Back I ....................... - )>)::)::':•>):a•,;:o+:•)»J:�>:do-r i :; yy�1 y.. :�..Y a `:. :; y� 'Yi:'33v....k>�krp•� r%�''i'.••`f:ic::g:;;;;. ............:....... ..:::..:.:.:....::........: ::;y.. ..�. r:...:,.....; .. ,t J'•?SM>:f: .< :c:;!„"'$:.a.:::.... Ra,�:xG?.wo... �z>:...o!t...... S Depth from Sall Hotlzon Texture 'Soill Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA)oil (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stories,Boulderes. Comista Graven �lZ t Nir X. ._ -3 -�5-Z1^1ZC '� �H� f�Y�C yfi-•.iC �;•.,...... ,� :. .' - �. .. , Y.• •J::�:%<'� �c•f'•fL'�'�+ kttiY^' '.a,L"iwSc4bYo� o•.7a4k•.'!. as'N,,. vcd: �. Depth from Soil Hodzoa Soll Twtllue:.. Soil Colo( Soil Otfiei ' Surface(In.) (USDA) (Munsdo Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulderes. t `�„';�� Consistency-%Gravel) Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Cot or Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulderes. 'rf:•`.c v)Yrf:..k:-:+.MF�i�:".:i:if:r:n::.f:�fi'h`i>fv:'.!v ij.: Depth from t Y Soil Horizon+ Sod Tex6c Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munscll) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulderes. Consistency-%Gravel) Flood Insurance Rate Man: `• Above 500 year flood boundary No_ Yes Within 100 year boundary No_ Yes Within 100 year flood boundary No_ Yes Depth of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist in all areas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? T­%Z1 If not,what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? Certification I certify that on q (date)I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of Environmental Protection end that the above analysis was performed b me c n intent with the required training,expertise and experience described-in 310`CMR 15.017. LOCATION IlQ1 SEWAGE PERMIT N0. 4. VILLAGE INST'A LLER'S NAME i DDRESS e U I l D E R OR OWNER DATE PERMIT ISSUED LA© DATE COMPLIANCE ISSUED � �� ��� '� '^- �� � 1� �� � I O HYANNIS A. M. 2681219 9 � / 40 s PLAN REF 240/15 ZONING: "RE G.P. O.D.: "WP 11 SUOMI ROAD A.M. 2681220/ FLOOD ZONE C B`� 1 �N r C IY.V y ' A.M. 268/235 ARh � np OF CB PANEL 2v000 0008 D CB ELC�R _ .es o 712192 S'82°4814"�, �,�, LOCUS titi IO . 00' i / l CB TP / RUCE ti ------ ASPHALT G. DRIVE MUFiPHY v No.749 LOCUS MAP GV 00 I 38.s• ' - ---�As------ ty STEa I 'DEC 6 ~ —\ --___-____- ----- ------ -5 6 4MI r AAUP \ AREA=10,000 SF, - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ ca ie5.3 � ��__ SEPTIC UPGRADE PLAN ,PikGy /3-BEDROOMS . --_____-___ LOCATED A T - - - - - - - - - - w 167 STRAIGHTWAY M. /268 34 O \ - - �o;zS.I _ BLHD .I. 24.9 o �; HYANNIS AIAGRAMM G S. - - - - IV. PREPARED FOR: _ r l O'b 3 ¢' ¢' w McLA UGHLIN 33 N ip h 3122103 ------- -- ---��4, REV. 41112003 M1XIMIUM FEASIBLE COMPLIANCE S82 4814 CRA VEL T ASPHALT SEPTIC REPAIR VARIANCE. 100 00' ---- i i DRIVE I. LEACHING 5.0' FROM PROPERTY LINE. I w - R4.7 SCALE 1 " = 20 FEET I 5.0' VARIANCE REQUESTED.) TITLE V 15.405 IA NN N\<< l< f1,�I/, ,2. LEACHING 14.0' FROM CELLAR WALL. A.M. 2681218 ' M RrHAE`iv %' "- YANKEE SURVEY CONSULTANTS . (6.0 VARIANCE REQUESTED.) TITLE V 15.405 IB gm =� `-°� � �e UNIT 1, 4 0 INDUSTRY ROAD 3. SEPTIC TANK 7' FROM CELLAR WALL. : °?�p��'"tea (3.D VARIANCE REQUESTED.) TITLE V 15.211 ' �5� ap � �-. � Qa° P. 0, BOX 265 ' A����,`° MARSTONS MILLS, MASS. 02648 TEL: 428—0055 FAX 420—5553 CONTO URS BASED ON THE GRO UND SUR VEY AND G.I.S. . PAGE 1 OF 2 J#53372E GM _2_4_9' TOP OF EXIST. FOUNDATION 20 MIN. �-- 10' MIN. ALL CONCRETE COVERS Z F /6 - /2 WASHED S719NE O ice . /6 MIN. . . � i MN 24.0' O 6' MIN. i i 4" CAST IRON PIPE 4 (OR EQUAL, MINIMUM CLEAN SAND O IT I/ PER FT _ - _ -�_. - - viN a�Ps plrN I/le'PER/�9=o oos - FLOW-LINE' - - - SCH 4(7 --- EL=23.0, W 0 RAISED PLUMBING iMlN.10 14" PI9�'H I/B" PER FT 2' ° I o° + 0 0 0 END CAPS -22 85' o EL.---- -22.5 ° o0 00 ° o0 0 0 �� 00 00° o0 0 ° 23.5 \—INVERT EL.---- 0 000 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 6 0 o ° °o 0 0 ADD GAS EL.=2_3.05' INVERT BAMW o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° o 0 EL.=2_3.3' 'DB-9" EL.=22_.65' 0 °0 0 0000 0 o +0 O o0 8 00°�°o� EL.-21.80' DISTRIBUTION _ 1,500__GALLONS BOX o 14'x 35'x 6" SEPTIC TANK _ TO BE WATER TESTED FIELD FORMATION -� IF MORE THAN ONE OUTLET ( T 9 BE INSTALED ON COMPACTED BASE) PLACE ON 6" STY9NE 3/4" 7V 1-1/2" SOIL ABSORPTION DOUBLE WASHED STONE SYSTEM (SAS PROFILE OF 14' X 35' FIELD SEWAGE . DISPOSAL SYSTEM 4" SCHEDULE 40 R VC (1.19) U S C S ADJ. GROUND WATER ELVE.= NOT TO SCALE INSTALL THREE (3) PERFORATED PIPES WITH 4' FEET STONE OBSERVED WATER TABLE (3113103) ELEV=_ 14.9' BETWEEN PIPES & THREE.FEET ON SIDES END CAPS ON END OF PIPES . O VERDIG - 5' ON SIDES-- 5' ON ENDS OBSERVATION HOLE 1 ELEV.= 20_5' PERCOLATION RATE �2__ MIN./ INCH AT _4K INCHES 40 MIL LINER HOUSE SIDE OF O VERDIG. GENERAL NOTES DEPTH HORIZ TEXTURE COLOR MOTT. OTHER 1) ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO D.E.P. 0-8" A SANDY :LOAM 10 YR 3/2 STONESMA" INSPECTION SCHEDULE.' TITLE 5 AND THE TOWN OF _BARNSTABLE __ RULES AND INSPECTION /1) HEATH DEPARTMENT SHALL INSPECT REGULATIONS FOR THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE. 8"-32" B LOAMY .SAND 0 YR 4/6 10;O2NEs" WHEN LEACHING EXCAVATION IS COMPLETED 2) ONE COVER ON SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE BROUGHT TO AND PRIOR TYJ BACK-F C. FINE SAND 5' OVERDIC-- APPROXIMATEMATE 32" 719 FINE SAND. 'WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE-- TWO COVERS WITHIN 12" OF GRADE. 32"-120" C FINE SAND 2.5 Y 6/4 / LOOSE, NO 3) ALL COMPONENTS OF THE SANITARY SYSTEM SHALL BE CAPABLE OF ST9N&S INSPECTION 12)HEALTH DEPARTMENT SHALL INSPECT WITHSTANDING H-10 LOADING UNLESS THEY ARE UNDER OR WITHIN GROUND WHEN THE COMPONENTS OF THE SEPTIC 10 FT. OF DRIVES OR PARKING AREAS. H-20 LOADING SHALL BE USED UNDER OR WITHIN 10 FT. OF DRIVES OR PARKING AREAS. WA TER .6 7"=EL. 14. 9' SYSTEM HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. 4) ANY MASONARY UNITS USED TO BRING COVERS TO CRADE'SHALL BE MORTERED IN PLACE. DATE OF SOIL TEST 3113103 SOIL TEST DONE BY STEVE DOYLE 5) NO DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE AS TO COMPLIANCE WITH WITNESSED BY: SAM WHITE P#10-446 DESIGN CALCULA TIONS.' DEEDED OR ZONING REGULATIONS. OWNER/APPLICANT IS TO NUMBER OF BEDROOMS . 3 OBTAIN SUCH DETERMINATION FROM APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY. GARBAGE DISPOSAL . . . . . . . . . NO 6) UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY, EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR TOTAL ESTIMATED FLOW IS TO CALL "DIG- SAFE" AT 1-800-322-4844 AT LEAST 72 HOURS CAL/BR/DAY x 3--- BR) 33o GAL/DAY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON SITE. ( -11--0-- 7) CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY GRADES AND ELEVATIONS AS WELL AS U.S.G.S. GROUND WATER ADJUSTMENT PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY 1500 CAL SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON SITE. ZONE "C" SOIL CLASSIFICATION . . . . . . . . 1 8) PARCEL IS IN FLOOD ZONE___'AE"____. WELL M. W.29 DESIGN PERCOLATION RATE . . . . . < 2 MIN./IN. f, 9) LOT IS SHOWN ON ASSESSORS MAP 268 AS PARCEL _219__. MARCH 03 EFFLUENT LOADING RATE . . . . . . •74 CAL/DAY/S.F. 10) PUMP AND FILL EXISTING CESSPOOLS ADJ. L 9' LEACHING CAPACITY (AREA X RATE) 362 CAL/DAY RESERVE LEACHING CAPACITY . . . 362 CAL/DAY (14 X 35 x.74) SHEET 2 OF 2 JOB NUMBER__ 5337,2------- HYANNIS .. �• 0 , A. M. 2681219oP , PLAN REF 240115 G.P. O.D.: »R�,,,, G4P�� N ' a SUOMI ROAD A.M. 220 FLOOD ZONE "C" �j 268 A.M. 2681235 � .*� �. D o 9�sa � oN PANEL r.5000 0008 100 CB 4814»E # 712192 LOCUS. 00' f 2 ' / 1 CB r------ ------------------ / 2 30'5. 5' OVERDIC -____-�--_ -; ASPJ9{i9LT �Q 0 DRIVE,- 4; O o - G„ LOCUS MAP 38.9' --------------- SO o _ (3. ... SEPTIC UPGRA DE PLA N LOCA TED A T- =10,000 �� . #167 STRAIGHT WA Y A.M. 2681234 0 =T.0.F= 24.9' ( G.I.S. - HYANNIS MA. f �LND ) 5 PREPARED FOR: moo• JACK McLA UGHLIN 31-15103 ` " ---- - r-------T_ _ GRAPHIC SCALE S8.? GRAVEL ASPHALT MAXIMUM FEASIBLE COMPLIANCE \ 14 �\ 100, pp' / DRIVE 20 0 10 20 40 80 SEPTIC REPAIR VARIANCE. 1 1. LEACHING 4.0' ABO VE GROUND WATER IN FEET (1.0' VARIANCE REQUESTED.) TITLE V 15.405 1 ( ) A.M. 268/218 i inch = 20 ft. ,2. LEACHING 5.0' FROM PROPERTY LINE. , (5.0' VARIANCE REQUESTED.) TITLE V 15.405 A YANKEE SURVEY CONSULTANTS ' 3. LEACHING 15.0' FROM CELLAR WALL UNIT 1, 40 INDUSTRY ROAD ' (5.0' VARIANCE REQUESTED.) TITLE V 15.405 A P. 0. BOX 265 MARSTONS MILLS, MASS. 02648 4. VARIANCE OF 1.0' FROM U.S.G.S. ADUJUSTMENT. TEL: 428—0055 FAX 420—5553 (1.3' ADJUSTMENT USED FOR DESIGN. TITLE V 15.103 3C PAGE I OF 2 Jf53372 GM L� 3 EL. = 24_9' TOP OF EXIST. FOUNDATION r� 20, MIN. 10' MIN. ALL CONCRETE CO VERS 2"LAYER OF EI=rRlcAL pox 2" PRESSURE LINE 1/B"WASHED STO S719 NE SLOPE TODRAIN BACK HBO PVC. 4" CAST IRON PIPE ; 6 MI ,�, , , EL.=18.0' s A (OR EQUAL MINIMUM - EL 22.5' 6" 5' O VERDIG „ Pl7t^H 1/4 PER FT g CLEAN SAND U SCH 40 P. I!C MIN. MIN M/N. P/PB PITCH!/!B"PBIP F7= 0.005 q FLOW LINE LEVEL EL=22.2' N PI7C'H 1 4 EXISTING INVERT lA�°N 14" • PER !/s"eLss° yob —17. 75' o EL=_1B.B' INVERT LARY ON EL.---- -22.25' ° °O o O O pp p O °O° 00 p°O pp ° ----- !Z. EL.-2 ° op o o o o p o 0 ADD CAS PUMP ON -22 O —21 7 o°o o o 0 0 ° o 0 0 0 ° ° °o°°o w EL.=1B.15' EL.-___ 473 INVERTBAMW P//YP OFF 3" CHECK VALVE EL.—_-- o o ° °o o ° $ o +o ° °o ° $ o° 4 o ' 18.4' e• ° EL.—21.2 3" WORKING RANGE DISTRIBUTION _ 1,500__GALLONS (70 BE PLACED ON HRM BASE) BOX WITH "T" 14'x 25'x 6" 1,000 _(;ALL ONS SEPTIC TANK H-20 PUMP STATION TFo MBE WA TER ORE TESTED OUTLET FIELD FORMATION —� SEPTIC TANK WATERPROOFED AT FACTORY. WATERPROOF AT FAC719RY PLACE ON 6" S719NE 3/4" 717 1-1/2" . SOIL ABSORPTION DOUBLE WASHED S719NE SYSTEM (SAS � ZOELLER "WASTEMATE" SUBMERSABLE MODEL M282 1/2 HP PUMP U.S.G.S. ADJ GROUND WATER EL VE.= 17.2 ALARM AND CONTROL PANEL OBSERVED WATER TABLE (3113103) ELEV.=_ 14.9' TO BE INSTALLED INSIDE BUILDING PROFILE 0 F ALARM TO BE ON SEPARATE CIRCUIT FROM PUMP 4" SCHEDULE 40 P. V.C. SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TOWN ELECTRICAL PERMIT AND INSPECTION REQUIRED INSTALL TWO (2) PERFORATED PIPES WITH 6' FEET STONE BETWEEN PIPES 1 14 X 25 NOT TO SCALE CONNECT END OF PIPES TOGETHER OBSERVATION HOLE 'I ELEV.= ,20_5' GENERAL NOTES PERCOLATION RATE �2 _ LMIN./ INCH AT _46: INCHES 0 VERDIG — 2' ON SIDES-- 3' ON ENDS DEPTH HORIZ TEXTURE COLOR MOTT. OTHER 1) ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM 7n D.E P. 0—B" A SANDY LOAM IO YR 3/2 SS7OMEYINES SMALL INSPECTION SCHEDULE- TITLE 5 AND THE Tow OF _BARNT7'ABIS--- RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE. 10% 2"-3" INSPECTION 11) HEATH DEPARTMENT SHALL INSPECT 2) ONE COVER ON SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE BROUGHT TO 8„—3,z B LOAMY SAND 10 YR 416 STONES WHEN LEACHING EXCAVATION IS COMPLETED WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE-- TWO COVERS WITHIN 12" OF GRADE. INSPECTION 12) LAND SURVEYOR SHALL STAKE POSITION 3) ALL WITHSTANDIENTS OF THE SANITARY NG H-10 LOADING UNLESSYSTEM SHALL BE THEY ARE UNDER OR CAPABLE WITHIN 32"-120" C FINE SAND : 2.5 Y 614 FINE SAND OF RETAINING WALL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION LOOSE, NO 10 FT. OF DRIVES OR PARKING AREAS. H-20 LOADING SHALL BE S719NES INSPECTION�f3)H&AL7H DEPARTMENT SHALL INSPECT USED UNDER OR WITHIN 10 FT. OF DRIVES OR PARKING AREAS. WHEN THE COMPONENTS OF THE SEPTIC 4) ANY MASONARY UNITS USED 7n BRING COVERS TO GRADE SHALL GRO UND I. SYSTEM AND THE PUMP MECHANISMS IC VE BE MORTERED IN PLACE. WA TER 67"=EL. 14. 9' 5) NO DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE AS 70 COMPLIANCE WITH BEEN INSTALLED DEEDED OR ZONING REGULATIONS. OWNER/APPLICANT IS TO DATE OF SOIL TEST 3/13 03` ,_SOIL TEST DONE BY STEVE DOYLE OBTAIN SUCH DETERMINATION FROM APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY. 6) UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY, EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR WITNESSED BY: SAM WHITE ' P#10-446 DESIGN CALCULATIONS. IS TO CALL "DIG- SAFE" AT 1-800-322-4844 AT LEAST 72 HOURS 3 PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON SITE. � NUMBER OF BEDROOMS . 7) CONTRACY19R IS 719 VERIFY GRADES AND ELEVATIONS AS WELL AS GARBAGE DISPOSAL . . . . . . . . NO SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO C0jVg fNCING WORK ON SITE � TOTAL ESTIMATED FLOW B) PARCEL IS IN FLOOD ZONE_--- ----. GAL/DAY 9) LOT IS SHOWN ON ASSESSORS MAP 26B AS PARCEL _219 ( 110__GAL/BR/DAY x 3___ BR) 330 Fy 10) PUMP AND FILL EXISTING CESSPOOLS PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY 1500 GAL 11) PUMP ELECTRICAL PANEL TO BE ON SEPARATE CIRCUIT. SOIL CLASSIFICATION . . . . _ 1 DESIGN PERCOLATION RATE < 2 MIN./IN. 12) THE FORCE MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO DRAIN BACK TO PUMP CHAMBER EFFLUENT LOADING RATE . . . . •74 GAL/DAY/S.F. 13) THE ALARM SHALL CONSIST OF A RED LIGHT WITH AUDIBLE BELL LEACHING CAPACITY (AREA X RATE) 259 GAL/DAY 14) AT ALL BENDS.ON FORCE MAIN, 1 CF MIN.OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING IS REQUIRED. RESERVE LEACHING CAPACITY . . . 259 GAL/DAY 15) ALL SEWER PIPING, INCLUDING FORCE MAIN PIPING, SHALL BE CEMENTED AT i (14 X 25 x.74) COUPLING JOINTS. SHEET 2 OF 3 JOB NUMBER__ 53372------- HYANNIS r• � A. M. 2681219 PLAN REF 240/15 ' RE G.P. 0.D.: " ,." G�P�� N ! .� SUOMI ROAD A.M. 0681220 FLOOD ZONE "C" A.M. 2681235 PANEL 25000 0008 D �� f CB / S82'4814'� 7/2/92 LOCUS 1DO 00' / CB TP / r------I--- / ® 2° /l� 2� �/ \ - ----------- -1-- Z5.B 40 Dy O / /-------�-------� ASPAMGT I DRIVr\ G„ LOCUS MAP 3e.9• �;I r �1 AREA-10,000 S.F. 11 p 111)0( 67 (3—BEDROOMS) 153 .14 SEPTIC UPGRADE PLAN LOCATED AT.• Ala 16 7 STRA IGHT WA Y A.M. 268/234 -T.O.F.= 24.9 HYA NNIS MA. � \ 1¢ 19� PREPARED FOR.- \ \N 333• ¢• 17 JA CK McLA UGHLIN 3117103 \ r-- - -- ---j 24.9' S8�48'14 GRA VEL I ASPHALT \ \ 100 0O' - / DRIVE MAXIMUM FEASIBLE COMPLIANCE 24 7 SCALE 1 " , = 20 FEET SEPTIC REPAIR VARIANCE. 1. LEACHING 5.0' FROM PROPERTY LINE. A.M. 268/218 (5.0' VARIANCE REQUESTED.) TITLE V 15.405 A YANKEE SURVEY CONSULTANTS UNIT 1, 40 INDUSTRY ROAD 2. LEACHING 14.0' FROM CELLAR WALL P. 0. BOX 265 (6.0' VARIANCE REQUESTED.) TITLE V 15.405 A MARSTONS MILLS, MASS. 02648 TEL.- 428-0055 FAX 420-5553 J 53372 GM PAGE 1 OF 2 � t a EL. =_24.9' 70P OF EXIST. FOUNDATION 20 MIN. �-- 10' MIN. ALL CONCRETE CO VERB 2"LAYER OF ELSLMICAL BOX 2" PRESSURE LINE SLOPE TO DRAIN WASHED STONE 6, IN BACSH80PVC. 24.0' 6' MIN. 6 A!! 6' MIN. . . . i i 4" CAST IRON PIPE EL =18.0' B A A _OR EQUAL MINIMUM - T 9" CLEAN SAND Pl7L^H I/4 PER FT FLOW LINE SIC 4O P. V.C. MIN M/N. PIPB P/7CH!/IB'PER l�'J- aoo5 1 10" " P%IC'H!/4"PER FT 1 s Br�Ere HOLe z'LE EL=23.2' w EXISTING INVERT MjAy 14 —17. 75 0 o O EL. I8.8 INVERT uEM°N EL'-___ 23 25' 0 °o 0 00.0 o END CAPS ---- ADD OAS -18.15' PUMP ON !2* EL.=2_2./ °° ° ° ° 000 ° O O o ° ° ° ° o ° o° °°Cb h 00 EL.—__ INVERT BA zB - s vn ems 5� CH6L^K VALVE EL.=23 O J ° o 0 0 0 0 $ o ° ° 0° 0 8 0° %° o _22.2' EL.= 18.4' a' ° o ° 5" NORKING RANGE DISTRIBUTION o 1,500_-GALL ONS (70 BE PLACED ON FIRM BASE) 3 -- --- 100o BOX WITH T 14'x 35'x s" „ „ ___—_GALLONS o H-20 SEPTIC TANK TO BE WATER TESTED FIELD FORMATION � H--20 PUMP STATION IF MORE THAN ONE OUTLET SEPTIC TANK WATERPROOFED AT FACTORY. WATERPROOF AT FACTORY PLACE ON 6" STONE s/4" 7n I_,/2" SOIL ABSORPTION DOUBLE WASHED S70NE SYSTEM (SAS BO UANCY?7 7 9 SUBMERSABLE MODEL M282 1/2 HP PUMP (2.3) U.S.C.S. ADJ GROUND WATER ELVE=—LZZ ALARM AND CONTROL PANEL OBSERVED WATER TABLE (3113103) ELEV.__ 14.9' TO BE INSTALLED INSIDE BUILDING PROFILE 0 F ALARM TO BE ON SEPARATE CIRCUIT FROM PUMP 4" SCHEDULE 40 P. V.C. SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM - TOWN ELECTRICAL PERMIT AND INSPECTION REQUIRED INSTALL TWO (3) PERFORATED PIPES WITH 4' FEET STONE BETWEEN PIPES 14' X 35' FIELD NOT TO SCALE '; END CAPS ON END OF PIPES OBSERVATION HOLE I ELEV.= 20. 5 GENERAL NOTES PERCOLATION RATE MIN./ INCH AT _48_' INCHES O VERDIG - 5' ON SIDES-- 5' ON ENDS DEPTH HORIZ TEXTURE COLOR MOTTI OTHER 1) ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM 7O DEP. O-8" A SANDY LOAM 1OYR 3/2 SOME MALL INSPECTION SCHEDULE.' TITLE 5 AND THE TOWN OF __BARNSTABLE__ RULES AND INSPECTION 1 HEATH DEPARTMENT SHALL INSPECT REGULATIONS FOR THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE / 10�' 2"-3" �) WHEN LEACHING EXCA VATION IS COMPLETED 2) ONE COVER ON SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE BROUGHT TO 8 —32 B LOAMY SAND 0 YR 416 s7ONES WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE--- TWO COVERS WITHIN 12" OF GRADE AND PRIOR 7O BACK-FILLING. 3) ALL COMPONENTS OF THE SANITARY SYSTEM SHALL BE CAPABLE OF „ „ FINE SAND 5' OVERDIG-- APPROXIMATE 32" 7O FINE SAND. WITHSTANDING H-10 LOADING UNLESS THEY ARE UNDER OR WITHIN 32 -120 C FINE SAND 2.5Y 6/4 LOOS4 NO 10 FT. OF DRIVES OR PARKING AREAS. H-20 LOADING SHALL BE S719NAS INSPECTION 12)HEALTH DEPARTMENT SHALL INSPECT USED UNDER OR A7THIN 10 FT OF DRIVES OR PARKING AREAS GROUND, WHEN THE COMPONENTS. OF THE SEPTIC 4) ANY MASONARY UNITS USED 7O BRING COVERS 7O GRADE SHALL BE MORTERED IN PLACE. IWA TER 6 7"=EL. 14. 9' SYSTEM AND THE PUMP MECHANISMS HA VE 5) NO DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE AS 7O COMPLIANCE WITH BEEN INSTALLED DEEDED OR ZONING REGULATIONS. OWNER/APPLICANT IS 7O OBTAIN SUCH DETERMINATION FROM APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY DATE OF SOIL TEST 3113 03 SOIL TEST DONE BY STEVE DOYLE B) UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY, EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR WITNESSED BY: SA WHITE_ PIfIO—446 DESIGN CALCULATIONS.• IS 7O CALL "DIC- SAFE" AT 1-800-322-4844 AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR 7O COMMENCING WORK ON SITE *' NUMBER OF BEDROOMS . 3 7) CONTRACTOR IS 7O VERIFY GRADES AND ELEVATIONS AS WELL AS GARBAGE DISPOSAL . . . . . . . . . NO SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR 70 C0dVKjj'NCING WORK ON SITE TOTAL ESTIMATED FLOW GAL/DAY { 8) PARCEL IS IN FLOOD ZONE—__AE____. _i_l0_ GAL R/DAY x 3___ BR) 330 9) LOT IS SHOWN ON ASSESSORS MAP 268 AS PARCEL _219 . 10) PUMP AND FILL EXISTING CESSPOOLS U.S.G.S. GROUND WATER ADJUSTMENT PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY 1500 GAL ZONE "C" SOIL CLASSIFICATION . . . . . . . . 1 11) PUMP ELECTRICAL PANEL TO BE ON SEPARATE CIRCUIT. ` WELL M. W.,29 DESIGN PERCOLATION RATE < 2 MIN./IN. 12) THE FORCE MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO DRAIN BACK TO PUMP CHAMBER EFFLUENT LOADING RATE . . . . •74 GAL/DA YIN F. ADJ. 2. 13) THE ALARM SHALL CONSIST OF A RED LIGHT WITH AUDIBLE BELL FEB. .3 LEACHING CAPACITY (AREA X RATE) 362 CAL/DAY 14) AT ALL BENDS ON FORCE MAIN, 1 CF MIN.OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING IS REQUIRED. 3' RESERVE LEACHING CAPACITY . - 362 CAL/DAY 15) ALL SEWER PIPING, INCLUDING FORCE MAIN PIPING, SHALL BE CEMENTED AT (14 X 35 x.74) COUPLING JOINTS. SHEET 2 OF 2 JOB NUMBER___Wj27z______