Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout780A CRAIGVILLE BEACH ROAD �, A ��� .4,70 _�� A „ � � � ,, r ^ a ;" '� E 1 i'a R*.S t "' � - , "a° f at" --� - ,, � �, , �: � : b h " , - , -, I , ­_ , ,,:,.� ",--y, 1 :'' - i"---,,,--�- , � -� - , ;'."" ,,,, -��111' , ,,,���_�. ,,,,,,-'1r", , ": ' '�, :�_ �,, , - "'.." ",-, , "' ' , ,, � -I . ,, ,. n x -,r y 3 r �,.„. la h�: I : — � 15, 1 "�W­,,�viv no�-v ­� , " 0 V4 � I v> N, ,�4'�jfo;§ ,, 1 1 QOAA J'Y rti. )? , 1.:': - V. , try E -Np .2 +, ^?` 3`s'x. .., t. 10, k : 'S y .C,' 7 :, ,' nwl a y n e., ,. x: 4.M _., - t,.r.- . ..�i. n 10 a '''S + t' ue., Tom. �*v ':x :: s... , .,. .v,.. r .:..,. i l,e::,. „ ,,1 r ,: r.+, E ':.il.., +M°v 3.. oY zl 'W,`.. .).. t ;) ., ., .. ,ws , a .! ,. N ., .. v 3 C .,:•;+. , .a+-a, ., .. x. ,ah a i ,t-5 "�7. ..,,.aw.,. , r.i,.. :.:, ,,, ,,.a.,.. ,',, r. .:.,.,r�: , , :s ..a..< 4 s.a..r ,s. rA sG g t. x• F :;a e.,f, a.. '4 I. k.:'::r; .. ,.,?'�. a -1 i s `far-S� i<% ';kw� ,. '. ,;'.; ra v a -- , 1. a �ryy1. x' Y x';,:, , t a ,:... , < -, ,r...,,, :,...* ...,,.a , ,,.r -s 1 ,.;a• asv f C s P. ,..': „ , .x,r , x' .+3'. ..a�i$'.1J, .. s. :. it.... ,. ,„lx t,.. ., .x ,)�' 1'. )'d r ,.."!Wig .a .... ,. ,,:i. ;4,. -:-,A., a, ,, „:.'.Y rot t , , „ :v.:. r f•,. 9 ''S 'f ,� .£ r,r-:a..�gg x N Y, ,-n,M ax,,n,i�.`A, ,z w k - x. '.,r. , ..a"fR: V w k r- ,.. - rs K ,. ,q ,{,. e yy4� i 1 a`,.a LW7''°; .,,,., , r,!,—? :.°a.x :,,. . .,,, .:: .. ':, r,,::h; a. '>'. ,fit r,t r w. ti d, '.'ai r. e i ,] ::., Y , ,....✓ '9 ..,AC` 'y.. f, , , -�, ,r..._.,, 'r"i W:,,', vr's 3 '-: -.:... :,.. }} =EY,: 4A ,{3xx 4, ",,9.��"<'?e .. :. ,.. d._, ,.,:S t{. , .r.. g- Y.',.n Mh ,: , , .. e1 r ,v l It� :,h 5:P, b, v< 'v,,.,.n A,,. :.. /. ..M . H ..,.... .:„..,. ,r ,.,;.Tm. r„.». Y 5. ,aM, .'. '�.. ..,. ,,,, i2n '>:e: ,k{ ,e .<, .,..., .,,. ., -, i t ,.... :, .,:.:. -,tit , t t'z/:�", +. n-.,.. , ,, f�.+F'. ;t ft v. -,6 �+Q ,., r w ,. t n ,.,- ,..t,:. Y ,r , "v'. E ,M .. .,. �' m, .t, k ,._,:..i•.. ,.:'.l , +. >r„ ..:.t- r,,... , Y, ,�a ":.�z ."{.. Gt Y:)R..,. ., :.,, 'ate 7.. ,..,t..t as ,OW .,.... ,c.., ,, x .,,..:,.," , a..,.:. n,,.! :n , a. .°RN `t .r ,. ,. .'n.,r. ..., ,.., ,: 5. (,":a 4s...'�....-:'.. _i:. „_, , ... ,, t`i :yr ,...' ,rf }' - . - k.._. „..-, .., >#:-.+l:iS '_e.... ..a.,, k, _ :. ,., x f... .A. , ....:.: 1 ,.5 tt5.: - P9 i r'a.,: f.''� sF::. .. n:- '�a , :..,Y -.-. .. ,;s- ..r.::... ,v.. - ::: c.. a , i f - ,{ } N:. .` • ,:,. Q...-W ,., ,.0 .-.}y. , a, a:ai ,.,:::$< #'. :> .; J S - .1, `t:'. ; A r „ a' , � .< ,�< r"e¢ _ s>. :,.. ,, .,,,. ,. .,,...,. £� .v , ..:a.. ,.:,a ,... .. .,n .. -v, .,,.. .san. .. ,..,..,., n.: ,...,.. ., , ,.,�. t .. kr,., k. n"w :at"• r x . 1 . tz a e 1<v Mir v%. v':, t, 4 �. •- w 5, w 1, .a1. t '.' ,.l. a. ,;'3r ...X '"~.R'v r , a, ., �, v,. .,, 'r;- :, .l. .4,.1,...„ , ,,.,:i r.}; ...X s, g,. ,_ ., r .. ., «., s ,. .1. _,., ,.,. ,, ,..,,>,>. ,..,. .h.. ,'3Y`..-.;. ..' ,;,y, .,::. ,.?tx.: s:..P' x i. 3r, ..,. . ..-. , ,fr roc <, n,.. , :t, ... ,.5- } yy , , ,. -.., -.s,.,.. _,.. 7Y.+Mr .g.F-. '..t..t,. ,- .3+., z , :' .. ,1 .A�r E.',i'. J 4} .a+ „ a 3 , F' .'✓,. Y, : _, a ,.:_ b....... a ,s # i. . ., .:. .n ... ,. ..... a. ..,.f ,......a :.:.,. .. :.... . ....,', ,t"-, .. ., , ., ,.,» ....,,xr. q� ..-, -` .:: S w �'a kn rS", '�'",,.. +r"F s ,*,r- -. a: w. , tl ,u,. ,, s- 3 af, �q S. > ,,a s:: �, r ,?, xsy, ,. ... ,,. .. ... ,. y 1. ,, ,., +, e `4 !€:wa+,r „ r. .t;.. en. a.-., „ pr,M 2+. ... >•,.. r. ,, . n . :.,',,..,: ,,,., F " n....,., ,. ., r, ec&,, <.., . thy ... :,. ,,'�' .,., : ..5.. `4 'y�ty. ." 1a;:v'ba,.. .:>. . ,. :....: , „ ,b.... x°' ..da +, ,'�V vi , :.,. ,�:',,., ..W.,J :.,.. >„++.v dv.. .rt f« ..:.._. [*,!. E t I::4 4, ,1:,.� " ... .., ,.. >: +. xt- t� ,,."� 1R. y, ..•-.,r ,.. S -..:.. �, a„ ,, `"'�,,,.... u.. 3Y,. n a.. a. „. ,.c. +. 'rr'` .. ....,. , 5. NY°�. ,. . .., ,... ... _...s.. > .., ,..: .,:w. ,b, ,n rr. `ti`> 7r ., is... ,Y.. -,...w , ', .'t»a�: ,. .P f" .. l .:�1 ,.. ,,y! �. .,F. :. +4v 4 1.. :,.'+"`': , t"P �..L .",', ,. .,: .. .. ..:.r .. a. ..a. .. , :2-r .,,,...., t,.,, ,. .�@,R, „t, ,w F _,_ ,Jr :.f: .t* zr 111' d . tf 4 t �_ ,. e.u.., r , ,,..,y�w .. u > ,_t„ ,., r. i'......1 .,., .' r. , .,..amsd"' *.,r.:. �., K -e,is:. , .o,: .... },,; Apr, < ,..,,.. G, "&* ,t ,.. '4Y., zt. ,..:. +wAa: .:..^ri.,.. .,%' .. :..",. r, it Y... .- - ..« , -. -. 's.. ::rt, ,. +.,..,, ,,. f<... .s_. ,r, ,.. 'yet..«. ., ,.,., .,r... ...,,., ,M, ,_..„ rt „C` ....., ,at ,.., ,wok,t".�}...aW:, .... .-. ,,.. ..M. .,..,.. d.. .. .. ... ,...,_., ,..:..__.'..._tt. ._, ..- �... :_fi. e' F .w. �'. +� J'11 ^s .. ., ? n £ --.. , e. .f,v �.., r r ., x, -:. .. , w.:i. „ „ ,x h , . :t, J:". ..e -,> , xr ^„d M S. _.'S�r ! M1, ,., .. ,,, , w. n ,., '.a eTn ,. .., � ,_ .. s N i x ,..+ a ,Ty 'a .' , 4rk .. .... rt � r ,�....., .t, :n .&, r m AJ.wF,, . ..rt < n.,,, , h..,. (r' 'fir _'i.. ... r Y:. <a., ..fir , ,. . ,. ,,.t .5.,,.,: P :r,;, r. ,,,..3A. .:., k „" , ,... .. t. :,, t �. Tf..,..x... .,s... �` a�a,,,��,� .., ; ,= 44w X*;. 4.a,,x ,.,„ b .,.... l.. ,.r"r.v.-R r a v.. , ,., S.:4, d .4r..., „ , ,.S ,. n.. _.. J r,r :. -°"'�' -.", -:,t.,. r(ia,,.. , ., r.: R AA ;!, .L ..,...J 1 w&. t. ,: ¢.}t- a ±V #..b..,,« x, -. , r ....c. r..,.,, . . a. ,., S'' r. r, n,... t. ,.:.,.... , ..f.. ,. .i :, v..a ,, ...:.. > .. ...,++ :« i 1_ 0.,., r+: a� :. .,. ,_..si..,. _:. 5V, _ ,S, ,,. ;,'. .. ,, +ter ,,.._—_ bq..`{7".' ..:r.,, :: ,: f e:,� . .„ .,, 1 .,. .. q r.., r, � o , ,�,, r �t>� ,...e ,<... ,. ,:.: .r a. t, t ,. ..,,r,F .._W.~r, 4 >.rk..ro ,,,: ..,..,;W s3" .,r ., ,:.,x:. _- 't< .. f. - ,:#r .. .,.:. - v.. .,, ..,.. .. fin.. r .-s: ,, s.... .F, v... , ,. , .a c fi'.�,''1t. a' ., -.: i' . p„ :.q ..,,. 3. C ar...,. h F. , q 5. , W- v , R a:i''4 .r:, 3.,e, .`" rt �a� �/.:. , -. 1 ,. ,. .$. „ +.. , 1. .,. ,, n :A° .., :,a. h.,. .-..r^ ..,ax.. C::. 1 a', k.,. .!t P .. F $.. M VR, C... i« h, ,.. ,.. ..iWs ,. !' ,; , .. k. .x ar.. M ,.. -h' ., ,.,,., , e+' x,'N. r, ,, f,:111__,�o`11: ,,; ,.a.. .. ,.. rs ,,. ,, .. _,. it :,. .e .. �, ,, 'C r.ar ,.t, :e.,,,. ., S+r ...-,r .,,, s mt,� ... „ a, At,, d''.. !: S n .t ,~..r. ,.. , :r_„e,. ..,e .>...,, 0.. ¢,..nt ,.hs... +a,...., ,. +t ..,.,r.. .. .,+ _-_f x £.,,¢ rr+.. C" �,._,u, -.. ,. .S,.... aas-:., ...,., .. e b. ., A ,. :) a . ., , ar ...,.., .. 'L 'r; �,,. :,a, ,� ,. ',:,... e.... .. c:•"'r4'.,,z„e,.,k;:. „, ,;,a ,..,. ,..1 a ..m < `fi ,....,., `. . .,.a.. .. .x. ,.,,.a .k '...,..5 ..fi. , ><, . . �: •,.I..,,, t r ,:-�-. x e €�,:'. ,. # r T x :. _ ,.. - !f. ,.-.:: Sc« #..,.>?. . .v+% ,. ,. ,.a,..:., -..e.. , _,. :.. .ar, .._ .,_., _.._ ..,�... ..z� „tia- a�'-s.. z.:r•. -_, r ,.' _. r, _ A3,.. .,.r....�,....:. .;. ...,,. .;::-xn .:.._.... c .. r<. --.r'` .-jx k':` .,r n a, ,f.':',. ..n:,. t ...,._., ... -, .. .r .,.d .... .K, ., .- .+ r , 1 Y :, =ro C to { 4` R".,. nv',� !.'iXl. ,(.A ,�,.,:..,. {� a ,4 �,,,, f _,,,.„ mf n H3 q-� ,t , a' ,, at. .,., ,yt v ,.'Yw .3 ri, , ^: t, „ ....... ,h , .."' .x .0 nt. .,.3 Z 3v V eE,f" k .h ,C],:':w. :l ...,Fl , .n N' m: „ :.. a,e d,?.$i: ..,At,v,K,-.. ! d_. , r « 1 V .iX'. :{.." 'tt n ,a�;= 5 .r. a },.,, , r.'l,a,Y , v, .,z:'4 ,. ,,,.v,.., .,.x:. .,A i e,+,_,. ,: ., ,. Mt, k w �') L , ,.. ,., r .:.,u1 a„ .,r,-1, r. .,.,. _ .. - .; _«v .:.<. C , :-3. ,y�,:. } ,1'1,`: v. �°S} '.0 5+ -',4,,$_ e*" C '. c , e. :;...... , , _.,,u- s ., t 4., 5, „a,. ,.:.t ,r r ,`. ,,r r %x at, ,. . - ._. , ....,: ... N.. . ,.,... .. .N-. ,. w v r M v t .,'. r. „ ',.«.... .::x. , ,r n. '.,: Aiff t�k :"Sk ,,.t f rnR a,,..,e. .v, f. _t . ., h. „r+ �.. .. •r , „r_..,. n.. .. a _. tt w'... _t.,,., T• i ,. "x.,-._x , ..,: r "*k ;..e..e "✓ .,.:I r,�.' 4.._. Sw,: ti. ..� .. ., , w. ,,..,.._..J , b ✓. ,.. ...., .: ! r. ,",r , ,.. o- N £. .. ,:v. Wr...,t .vr .:d.:w>r..''. a rr rf. s...�, .. , d +,.:,., ,«.. ..., , x.r;,. .. -.�f.. .»�t .,tr A', rr,•a „ - , ., ..L, r. i, „,. e,4.. s ,,. .,, r 'F$a .x..r., .;x. :4,.`', , .. Cs+..i -,a t.. ,M. x :n?, , ...,.._�,,, ,. ,, - '..c 4 ti•�Sl .:.,i.r., ,, s. s:, ., g'. s t„:. ,,"J s ..,i'.:.;, ,w ,ai'. is �y ��si� - *r a ; ... 4. -; ..,.. x.. .. , e ,. Y X ,ar, ...t. ..t ,N.,. .. rr.. „ ... Y ,, - 'k ... ,.. , "Y .. 5... 3..n. f i e , nl ':.t ... r s... .r. ,.. .. .^S. , :t.. 1NM I,. ,, ,,,pe" 'r :f, ,. -,, x r F �, ..`Pa .,.r ,.,,fR ,:.,a _,x� § ,q.. � V t>., 'a9'`:r.. ,.. , ...,,, n r ,,..a .., „ ., .kr ..... , :a.aj? , za. a 3'.. »...k' a -,. �:`ac ,-: .. ,n �.. <:r:-<., ';.:n a.... ,.4"Sn.. dr._. , r„ .. .., s. ,,.::. _? Q,'r. > n ::.:., .,w ,.. , ,Grv, _,..... te*. w` - ':w �..` .. at' ,rrc .,p.! -a .a... ..o, ci: r ,+,,. ..e. t4, < ,.. „ r m .3'9r "r.,.,. , f . . , r , ><_�91. ..NN..d.. , >..:, .e..,. ,. .,:.'1 „'k`.: �... ,.. s ,. . v.. ::: :.Y _,*' „tnt.14 :F. i .n vS , .+. . ., .e.., ..?., .,4 ., r.;.., , ,z..L... ,w ,a , ---� '"{-., r:'Pad« ,v' !y ,. , ,...': ':;. s .. .. .,,w„ :.a,. 4 .. ;,.._,. , t. ,g" ' . " rs a ,+ r,','- .a s x£. a,,. ,. a ,, �.„ ,., 1: b }�� r ,,,:,r S,.. .,.,,,r...e. 1 44... .'.':,. ar -..:, f „ro «'�r , .'.:.� ,. i••+ : ��4. _� 'F.` :4V "', ..�.v�t",i' `nt .Y i1 n.}{:' v i' .1, F. _ ,...., ., w ....,,r 2k.L 't.n., ...,.. a. ?.Y,�i .� "4, r"i,s. }° ,. ..... �. „. ls. ,.... '.n x, .: t :...,:. t 'k;.,:,, > t^ .„ d s , .i .._` f ,+„.a•4 .. ,.r ,„ ,a. �. ,. '5. 5, -,., x <, a >.-..> -fir::. 3 _.a !r,,F .. .,...., ,.. „ r r.,. , ... .._ :a., . .,... , ,k...t, , , c daa: kr1 a f.. 1:, tt,w8-.. .. ,. ,.r.,.. ,{ ... .....- PW. ., .,,. , 3, ;... .ro,.. e ..,. w 32:.. h ,. ., .+,rn,a,7 -:krr.. 6. ;l _r_,, ...,-.. -, ..t- ,. .. ^r,. r.; ,,,:r",r1 ..r.. ,.- z,, a V[, ra cE. }, ,,... . ,,.xu P.,, ,. x - , �,, ., k , .. ,,. ,,, a,-. :. ,, ,, a+4:.:. 3, .a.:.. ,K .,::. r.,.,... 1.,.<.y . 1....:..: _X L A`+ f t< . .+b?t'i. .,....: ,,, , , »-. ., ,,.- ,. ., as sf v :5> .u- ,.,, 4 s:.. .~f.�.. .. � '.., ,, ,.,x , m ,.:,:.. ,. „ ,�'.,v ...,,..._, ,=r:i , x.r d:?' *r .ti`r > s. .. „ . .:... .... ,W:. ,... a ,.,, ,.,.,.,.. > +> ., , -. 1-vr s +r r ,..,, ,.n,. ,::� .c. '.. w c,; aa,> r 4, ,.M,. ,r i+t, Y3 4. .,``.. , ,1. a, (... ka ,+.."', x^:+.'. , ,T....H,: ,,., .. v t - rym .H .. ,..-arS. .. .,.-,..- d ., 'i.. , ...; :.-ru .mom,. ., ., ,....: e „.,,... ., ....... , ... .,,µ r °\-. 1 'ri".', y +� t .::. „ ,y. t ,..,. S vi _,., t .n ,,..,r , ,,.f.... w.:. F-:. x: :v ,.,.",: ., ^':, -a,vf $ a,Rb.� _ ,.' '..t,. -..,.. grcA :... t ,,.. -n,.:. r_ , .. ..n..,._, ,..... ,,:. .,d!.s '.....,,r ;'., i.;,.. :/ Er a5 { ,:,,t. .., ,.a R:....,. Y. ,... .. ,., .:. .. C. ,.,.,<�' 9, ...5.,.: ��g }',&, .K4+n- „?., �{ da. 1r b era ., a,, ,. :a ggYY ,3. a a a r r. ., + a:".;. r ,. .a ..,,.. yy .., ,,,,. s ,Y %,. S' ., v.. I' ,.-... ,:.; N a e,W i,+Y' Ti4 +Y. k ... s4: ,, .. ..a:,o-, de ;: :::. -..: , J'. _. , . ,.,::,., ;,t 3r. ,,. a.. # , ,. 1 . ,5 „"S'•.. i !< ,,6 ,;A,�' r. .vY,..,.,: , ...,. .,, c-., -,:.....,, .., .M_;,n ,.,, ,, a �,4.. ^P -T+S. F 1 ,fi. i+'.:,.{,$r. MEW t -% , , ,..,.:v4 u, 9 ,,.,.,, „ r....,..: , , .,.. .., ,..;.., ,,.- ,q':..- .. yr. ., ,. ,.. ,f? {., Y ,�.k:.aY,.�F.- ). .. ,. -,r :...:� f ,ru ,.Y,.. a ...,... , s.,x ,F.',,... -v, �.,," + r „ ,.., ,,, , .,C,�,' '4'+. a. F.iva., ;.� x... ,r<, xxr,.,...,, ... , aa:.=,,. 4,. :rx ,...t r,,.',:�..x2. r 4, .><x ,!rP,:•, ,' "...., _ ,.k. , r; 7,.., a; a as ,D aA , _: < „r,„.. ,,,, a.. ,. , r... ,_« Spa' 'ri ^e S ,t a• - m.. ;a. ::z. -.m vrr Sg:'.y..:_,. t. « o- , ':: _ .„>,;, r++ yla k a?',qS::f aW.Mye<' Y"" `g1. r ,. %.F , 4 , ,: : ,.x,.. h .,.s.l::. P,a:,. mn,...,_�n fu. 1 .: � .-3 k„ , :,? ^ �y�; : , .. b iR [ :,.Slat ,,,,v .,, t '� ..a,, , , i ;. , ., ..<, ,;:, r!;. 'i<.FV}. r ..r. , , x. ,.,rt ,�:.,, k ..1 t t r '...,s F5 , r ., .. a4,,.a. „ , ..,ru,.. , _, ,,,,�,.. l 5. ,.., + ,,. ,.e < "A .,, „ , b d.. .t 4 ,C n. t ,r w. „ ,d v , .,.:,kA. - '. $ v y... , .1�. < ..k:'.c.i r..A,,:, t ,-.. 'J^ ,d ,,.. a -.. .. ,,... ,.. a.,. a ,. a ,... d�- .s.,. tf, :h,: Ea' h ,..,, lY..,.. , f. 3 v-. .,Fm. a r..,,.. ,., v f .. , ,a ..,.y�; ., p i'. , r. x,� 'i Y .a,^.� .''" e.::.. .. tk v„r. ,.:i .wY 7, „ ,.2, .,.,Y. , ., ,. v. 4.A.. 4 r ,c :_ +;... ,a..4"3' _ ..at t'h �} £,F k ,y r ,>,.t. $, .r., 'Wq , .',^+r .,..,.:,,, ,+, 4 :.l , - - r: 5<,. Iv.?aY F= .kc, 1'x b='}s ...,% :; t, ,... 1 , ,-.' i, ,. .. a:. , ^(. I 1;•": :1.. y :. .fir ,}r 1. .,n., .R. .c. 5,6.,..- .-,.»;.,t .. .::..a n•,:.'e. Kt, :^ .r ,Y,,d f t ,..... ,. , , , v w :-,:. ,,, e.,,..,. e » b ',:.. .. t.., f`.,. ,.4r r.,:, d. .ro n.. h. ,,. G., .. ..,:,r '�y,. » .. •' ':, „ ,,.': nw,. r .r. .S !. , sr ran v':,, ,_. ,W k ,. ,,'.s... r ,,..,. 8a+t..., i',': ..d ➢. 'ah,.,. a.*. r tt ,x• 45...,, ..a;,.,.'kt a .,, r-..;... 4.-.a,... 1 ,. t..,..r », r. ,,,s ,,..r e y a5M' s d ,. ,.:,,, t, ,.n:'F r,.+,4 :;t..,, ,y, „ .na , ...a...,,= c. .az a d. ,,.,:� , . .;. : r ' _' 9:,<' .a�nZ.r,° 4. dw�, _.,, _ K. ,ram F 4 =',. .. ,,! ,art:.- .,-: "y_ _ .a::,;r - ,, t. 1 p... ,'4•.r r ^cY„•"` Ya `'" } .,.,.,:tl ... r ;a ..,. s, .,: „? , .+ ,4 , a .'r Sy,s`a{, e " ,r as$ '^d s it . >„ a . r,-,* ,. n ,w .r, _,,,.. ': ,r` ;�+ 9.a + k.w+"`ia,�`t ...'; iR ....,rF.:A ,.� ., ^„..... ., r ,r ,,» ..:i�.,..:, .:a: ;4",. {f yr r,_ n, y i r 4., :,.... :1,. ,. ! ...K,:. „ •!.;r. Y ,"$ r. \. d .,Dr' a'.�:58' a;.,, t^r r c:... k... , ,r, ,x adr ,(: .^:. r,,,, b,.a , a R I t >S"�' S€ 5- ;G:�^ a x. „ , ` .�. , '.3 s'. i y n5' ''"Y ta+u YAr.,q Y a ?,+ is11 t r ',�;> N, -. ,..' , ," ,.:J :'' ,:; .a' t -r r dar. t-,:«" ,w r; h ,nJ t,w ._,. w.,... -... .R. „ +' , l'." , „ ('^, w. tl,. „k: °hf> 'a Yd: k, ^a3 .,`tl,•n ., s .:w: .t..... ,. .,...>, r`. ,.et ,xy. .,, ,sn y'. �S r... .::;. +«i a to £"t`�'. gg'� - .:: x 4. ,r ,. .. M „..,. H, , <,,..., 4 : k.:,:.'+,, ,r ,r .', ., .,. R ,9.. .V f+,/ 1 ", n t, w . 41+ ._, . , ,A J,,..til+ c i',:<= eke ,,,a „r:9,§.x 4 t, �> .64. „ b. , „_.• 's, -, a r., ',..a ,ri h.Sty, , r .�5, , „t e� t -. .. " T.- m ,', v rx, i ¢ , ,_v.....__,,,.,,..___ .. _ : �.._ .. _ , :. - '' - , , fit .r i '^,.. s ,,,, ,,, s ,,i11 OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC, 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #19 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: September 4, 2007, at 10:30AM Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, Sunny, 70°Ff Present at Site: Chad B. Hill, Coastal Engineering Co., Inc. (CEC) l David A. Morand, Coastal Engineering Co., Inc. (CEC) Richard Scanlan,J. K. Scanlan Co., Inc. (JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of Richard Scanlan(JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for the retaining walls at buildings (D-C)and(B-C). Also, slab preparation for building"D"was inspected. In addition, the existing steel beam at the northeast section of bum ilding*AY was looked at and will be analyzed for load capacity. 1. It was observed that the forms and rebar placed for retaining wall sections were in accordance-with CEC plans with the exception of a few rebar locations not placed 2"clear from the inside of the wall form. • All continuous horizontal rebar appeared to be#5 bars spaced 12" O.C. as specified. • All vertical rebar appeared to be 45 bars spaced 12"O.C. as specified. • 2"Dia. PVC weeps appeared to be installed for drainage as specified. • All rebar doweled into existing concrete walls appeared to be set.using the specified epoxy. • Rebar located in wall section"C"on SK-I measured 4 1/2"clear from inside of wall form, not 2" clear as specified on.CEC plan: • Rebar located in wall section"B"at angle only on SK-1 measured 7"clear from inside of wall form, not 2"clear as specified on CEC plan. • All form geometry appeared to be sized and placed properly as specified. • It was also observed that a hole was dug under the footing of buiding"D"for a drain pipe to pass through. CEC advised J.K. Scanlan:to fill in with concrete when work has been completed. 2. Slab preparation at Building"D"was observed and was in accordance with CEC plans. • Transverse bars in strip footings appeared to be#4 bars at 12" o.c., as specified. • Continuous longitudinal bars in strip footings appeared to be 4-#4 bars equally spaced as specified. • Specified WWM appeared to be set with appropriate chairs and in accordance with CEC plans. ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 September 4,2007 Field Inspection Report#19 3. The existing steel beam at the northeast, ls`floor of building-"A"was inspected by CEC. • The existing S8 steel beam is bearing 4-5" on the existing concrete foundation wall. 0 It appears to have some rust and oxidation with an approximate 4"dia. hole cut out for pre-existing plumbing or drainage. It is recommended by CEC to weld a steel plate covering the cut hole. It is also recommended to weld a new C8 x 13.75 A36 steel channel onto the existing steel beam flange to add reinforcement. Submitted by: Chad B. Hill Date Structural Engineering Technician CBH/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart David A. Morand,P.E., SECB (CEC) D.•IDOCIC]6600U6684I16684.01IInspectionsIField Inspection Report 19.doc I OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 ■ Provincetown 508-487-9600 ■ Hyannis 508-778-9600_ ■ Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #18 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: August 30,2007,at 7:00 AM Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, Sunny,-70°Ft Present at Site: of Chad B. Hill Coastal Engineering Co. Inc. (CEC) t ` David Robbins,J. K.Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of Davi bin (JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for the retaining wall footings atTbuilding�; (B C)and;(AsB)"�"� !/ 1. It was observed that the forms and rebar plac r all retaining wall footings were in accordance with CEC plans. • "lyooting.dowels appeared to be#6 bars spaced at 6" O.C. (12"O.C. at A-B)with the specified hook size and direction:as on CEC,plan:; 4 r; • Transverse rebarin;footing appeared to be#4 bars spaced at 8"O.C. (10"O.C. at A-B)as specified. 1 •. -Longitudinal rebar appeared to be#4 bars spaced at"12"O.C. (16"O.C. at A-B)as specified. • All forms appeared to be placed on the existing sand based soil,which appeared to be compacted with the ' exception of a few areas where men have stepped while tying rebar together. • All footing forms appeared to be 12"thick as specified. All footing form dimensions and geometry appeared to be in accordance with CEC plan. • All rebar doweled into existing concrete footings appeared to be set using the specified epoxy. • The stepped footing between buildings A-B measured out at a 5:3 ratio and is determined to be acceptable by- CEC. 5 =3 Submitted by: r ' rl. -�•, i Chad B. 14111 Date Structural Engineering Technician CU CBH/dlb cc: J.K Scanlan,C6,,Inc ..+:_ Keenan;&Kenny.-Architects- James John Stewart ry David A. Morand,P.E., SECB (CEC) 1):00 06600V 6684116684.01 JnspectionslField Inspection Report 18.doc ■Providing solutions for the benefit'of our clients and community■ 1 OASTAL NGINEERING a J v'd'� f, ia ; , i_ OMPANY, INC. 0 9 MIA,P 19 P ii 1: 2 9 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompanyxom Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600y----■G,r; H,yamrs 5U9 7°78-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #43 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: Thursday,Feb. 14,2008,at 7:30 AM Barnstable,MA Weather: cold,sunny,35'Ff Present at Site: Mel Dishman-J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) Tim-Shawnlee Construction Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc.(CEC) A field inspection was made per the request of Mel Dishman of J.K. Scanlan to inspect the framing for the balance of 1Biuliing AA"(Units 1-4);the following was observed: Unit 1 • The floor framing and sill conditions-in Unit 1 were not observed,due to limited access to the crawl space. The framing in this location needs to be inspected prior to CEC signing off for the framing.Moderate molding was observed on the underside of the floor sheathing. CEC was informed that steps would be taken to mitigate the issue. • There were no SDS screws observed to be used to attach the exterior walls to the sill,nor was there nails observed to be protruding from the bottom of the wall to indicate that Simpson LS90 clips were used.Either Simpson LS90 clips or SDS screws must be installed as previously specified. • The Simpson L and T brackets were not installed at all LVL beams and post locations.CEC was informed that straps were ordered,and will be installed as previously specified Unit 2 • It appeared that the gable end,truss had proper bracing at the bottom and mid height of the truss. • The roof trusses,which extend over the deck area,did not have.the required plywood gusset connection at the outside end of the truss. Gusset plates must be installed according to the manufacture's recommendations previously provided. • The roof framing at the CMU wall between Units 2 and 3 is comprised of roof trusses landing on the interior 4" bearing wood stud wall. Some of the roof trusses were not aligned with the wall studs as specified.Additional studs need to be placed directly under the roof trusses. • The roof trusses,which are next to the CMU wall,are not blocked at the lower chord and needs to have the required blocking extending to the CMU wall as shown on Section I on A7S6. • It was noted in the first floor framing that there was a 3 1/4"diameter hole in one of the LVL beams for the fire sprinkler system. The hole is located at mid depth and is 15"away from the support location. CEC informed the framer that this needed to be checked for strength.Per the LVL manufacturer's recommendation,all holes should be in the middle third of the beam and no greater than 2"in diameter. After analysis,it was determined that that the hole size and location in this case is acceptable.It is advised that no penetrations through LVL beams be made without first consulting with the engineer. ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ r Trade Winds Residences LLC Page 2 of 3 February 22,2008 • The second-floor LVL deck framing was observed to be built in accordance with CEC drawings. The end blocking between the LVL and the I joist flange was approximately 4"in length,as opposed to the 12"in length that was specified.After further review,it was determined that this is acceptable as the blocking provides adequate bracing of the LVL beam. • The coil strapping underneath the windows was missing at the gable wall in the 2"a floor.The framing sub- contractor informed CEC that this was because the sheathing on that wall lapped from the first floor to the second floor,which is acceptable. Unit 3 • The trusses,which extend over the deck area,did not have the required plywood gusset connection at the outside end of the truss. Provide the plywood gussets as specified by the truss manufacturer. • The Simpson L and T brackets were not installed at all LVL beam and post locations. • Some of the roof trusses do not align with the wall studs as specified. Additional studs need to be placed directly under the roof trusses. • The roof trusses that are next to the CMU wall are not blocked at the lower chord and should have blocking extending to the CMU wall as shown on Section I on A-S6.' • The valley beams at the back of the building are'not supported at the exterior walls. Install either 6x6 posts or built-up 3-2x6 studs under the valley beam at this location. • It was observed that no connectors were present where the valley meets the ridge. The specified hanger needs to be installed. • It was observed that the ridge beam had no mechanical fastening to the support element. The contractor was informed that this could either be done with Simpson L or T brackets,or Simpson A35 angles. • The rafters that frame into the ridge beam did not have any hangers. The contractor was informed to use the hangers specified on sheet A-S4.1. • In the mechanical room in the basement,it was observed that the sill had questionable attachment to the foundation. Only the lower 2x'sill has any attachment to anchor bolts,which do not have nuts and washers attached to them.The upper two 2x sills appear to be resting on the lower 2x sill with no attachment present. Proper attachment of the sill to the foundation needs to be provided. • The floor-to-floor connections appeared to be completed as specified with Simpson LS90 angle or Simpson S_DS screws. Unit 4 • The trusses,which extend over the deck area;did not have the required plywood gusset connection at the outside end of the truss.Plywood gussets are required at each location as specified by the truss manufacturer. • The valley beams at the.back of the building are not supported at the exterior walls.Install either 6x6 posts or additional studs under the'valley beams at this location. • Connectors were missing where the.valley beams attaches to the roof truss. • Specified hangers need to be installed at several ridge beam locations: • Rafters hangars were missing at the ridge beam connection point.Rafter hangers are required asshown on detail A-S4.2. • The Simpson L and T brackets were installed at all LVL beam and post locations. • The connection of the posts to the beam at the first floor entry porch could not be observed due them being covered with the final trim work.The connection of the beam to the post must be checked,or documentation to indicate satisfactory completion shall be provided. • The steel column by the stairs running from the basement to the first floor appears to be offset from the steel column running from the first floor to the'second floor. There should be a 3'/2"x5'/a"LVL under the steel column as detailed in SK-29 dated 9/28/07(attached). • The floor-to-floor connections appeared to be completed as specified with Simpson LS90 angle or Simpson SDS screws. Trade Winds Residences LLC Page 3 of 3 February 22,2008 General • CEC noted standing water around the steel column in the basement.This water should be removed,along with any debris(see attached picture). This will need to be re-inspected to determine the condition on the steel columns what corrective measures that may be needed. • The contractor was informed that they must not start sheet rocking until CEC signs off on the building framing. Submitted by: Jon Downing,E.I.T. JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart D.IDOCICl660011668411668401IInspeclionstField Inspection Report 43.doc r } i x d No hangers present on rafters and LVL not attached to support. Provide specified connectors at these locations. y pj �'#^: ! 4 J•' -•��p�� .. viIj* C - cif°4 {n Web stiffener provided at floor joist bearing location. Typical steel beam to column connection. C 16684.01 2/14/08 J M D/d lb 1 r _ r• O4.v Y MAk4 ny ®' ��I .,�,. I '_ w r * P y V 0 } lu 116 Simpson LS90 angle drilled through. CEC will allow this, as Water noted at steel base, along with debris. Water and debris only one angle was drilled through. needs to be removed from the hole. S � 9 S 7t 00 1-ZZ ,n r ' Lag screw not properly fastened into LVL. �1;,,c ® ply , Ridge beam and rafter missing the specified connectors. 5` { C16684.01 2/14/08 JMD/dlb 2 s. . r ry V. i Truss bearing on interior wall. No stud directly below truss. Specified hangers are missing on valley beam connections. WNW IOWWK NNW �a � i;+ �� �• ''+.� Y' 'A yam:: � /�s ...•yr'+.'.•- w. ,a: . r 4 R•, ta� , , usr' F Specified hangers are missing on valley beam connections. Connector missing for post to beam. C16684.01 2/14/08 JMD/dlb 3 .. s s- 5 2 ir,•�4 .w.�• 1 " rllw CAI Y✓ f A No post present under valley beam. Provide post or additional Concrete cracking at Unit 3 mechanical room doorway. studs under valley beam. r .:. �. '• ° rt':la,a ""'�.. "y �.«...q� ,`°'+*yt4..r ,�,»M yl .?"+�y"- � - sn Fs w p Waa.'.r aw -u • k rr ;7T,w..�-.+ra. - ...Psi.....- w= a:.. ...— Simpson LS 90 and coil straps attached as specified. Steel beam resting on new foundation wall in Unit 3 mechanical room. C16684.01 2/14/08 JMD/dlb 4 The sill located at the mechanical room in Unit 3 is not The sill located at the mechanical room in Unit 3 is not properly attached to the foundation. properly attached. Note that the anchor bolt is in a scab piece of wood. ;:'• "tines a F6 EW a ... r Bracing of roof trusses at bottom chord. Bracing of roof trusses at bottom chord. C 16684.01 2/14/08 JM D/dlb 5 t it t y t 7-TAQ ze .� .r. Gable end truss bracing at Unit 1 roof. The bracing appears No strapping found under the window at Unit 2 on the first floor. to be adequate. t �'Y . »,rr,..• fry ._i- .,.. ,a • f•. r,,,,�^ y Ft + � < { �, � + �1 �. �f s���4�"'�n«•+ riv*�r"'.+1..�.. �.+*++a",-e�y, "�� ref. � '� Z • - SE - �. y�{r"J��.I'w i y�y„ � v �` M v �" F .,q��.1�: , # #' 1MWY MWY-,�.YH�.'4R JI�—�"R". s".••,� • k 10� !' „Y? y/•r ...�''yi rah�,,. CR t? a .., s t �K G Blocking at the back of the LVL only has about 4"of bearing Steel connection to LVL beam as specified. compared to the specified 12"of bearing. C16684.01 2/14/08 JMD/dlb 6 ". Y"�p[?-�.s. �d ,f � L � Si: `s �r•�� '� r y } � r i�/i j n /r 414 y It does not appear pre-drilling of LVL occurred, causing the Typical I joist attachment to steel beam for Unit 2 first floor. screws to separate LVL. } { r Mold found on the underside of Unit 1 first floor framing. z %�r W—^,r..�r'�f"""`�"` ' -• .�—. 'Sys{., .f F i rr pp r. 3,'/4"diameter hole in (2) 1 3/4"x 11 7/8" LVL beam in Unit 2 first floor framing. `' C16684.01 2/14/08 JMD/dlb 7 t OASTAL _ N NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. CH - > 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.Coasta,3 ineeringCoompsy.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 FaxW 8-2 )6700 .c' r STRUCTURAL FIELD REPORT #48 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location:--�780'Crargville�Beach*Road Date/Time: Monday,May 20, 2008,at 3:30 PM "B`a�rn�stab le,AMA Weather: warm, sunny, 65'Ff Present at Site: Frank—Shawnlee Jim Hudson—J.K. Scanland(JKS) Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) A field inspection was made per the request of J.K. Scanlan to inspect the final punchlist items for building "A";the following was observed: -44 Unit 1 • The LPI-20 I joists which frame into the LVL.beam at the front of the building used Simpson HU412 hangers.-instead of.the specified Simpson HU312 hangers.The Simpson HU412 hangers are too wide for the I joists and were,padded.out as'specified. Unit 2 • A set of stairs was being built to the deck at the front side of the building. It was observed that footings had concrete sonotube footings placed under the posts for the landing. . Unit 3 • It was observed that the ridge beam had no mechanical fastening to the support element. Connection shall be made with either Simpson L or T brackets, or Simpson A35 angles. • The.rafters that frame into the ridge beam did not have any hangers.Provide proper hangers as specified on sheet A-S4.1; or Simpson A35 angles maybe installed.. Unit 4 •` The rafters that frame into the ridge beam had Simpson LS90 placed as specified. •, , It;was observed that the ridge beam had Simpson LS90 mechanical fastening placed to the support element as'specifi'ed. x ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ . @S Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 General • CEC has released the final structural affidavits for Buildings"A", `B", and"C"to Jim Hudson with the understanding that CEC may perform one more trip to the site to ensure that the final connectors missing were placed as specified. Submitted by: Jon Downing, E.I.T. JMD/dlb - cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart i 14 S�,F4 - i ��t f y ,:-t w`" � i ��� 4 '�\'�V ".:�+�T "-`«"'3�-'�'�_,r....T~,s*_��'• '"� F j� loor CY Al a y _ ♦{r•t "Ij f i �Y 4 � APT�_'� � �"��. Blocking placed to fill hanger at Unit 1. b a' { , .�4 Simpson LS90 clips laced on ridge at Unit 4. Simpson LS90 clips at p p p g rafters to ridge at Unit 4. C16684.01 5/20/08 JMD/dlb 1 J i ?If 1 IRE� _; Dormers where hangers need to be placed in Unit 3. a Simpson LS90 placed at rafter to ridge and ridge to support in Unit 4. C16684.01 5/20/08 JMD/dlb 2 OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A), Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-25576511 ■ Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 M Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD REPORT #47 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location.�7-$0;,Craigvil"l:e;Beach Road Date/Time: Monday;May 19,2008, at 3:30 PM Barnstable,MA Weather: warm, sunny, 60'Ff Present at Site: Tim-Shawnlee Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) A field inspection was made per the request of J.K. Scanlan to inspect the final punchlist items for building"A"; the following was observed: Unit 1" , e; • The LPI=20 I foists;which"frame mto<tl e-LUI<beam-at the�frorifof the building;used•.Simpson:•HU41:2�hangers instead-of the' specified-:Simpson;HU31V2-hangers The!Simpson HU412 hangers are too wide for the I j oists and need to be-padded.out orremoved and..replaced with-Simpson HU3.12.hangers.. Unit 2 • A set of stairs was being built to the deck at the front side of the building. It was observed that footings were placed under the main support posts for the landing. Unit 3 - • It was observed that the ridge beam had no mechanical fastening to the support element. Connection shall be made with either'Simpson L or T brackets, or Simpson A35 angles. • The rafters that frame into the ridge beam did not have any hangers. Provide proper hangers as specified on sheet A-S4.1; or Simpson A35 angles may be installed. Unit 4 • The rafters that frame into--the:ridge'beam did not.-have any.hangers:Provi&proper hangers s speci l@d oQ sheet-A`54:1, or.SimpsorijA35 ari'g1eS may be installed �= • It,was observed that the ridge beam had no mechanical fastenmg to:the support`element.:-(gnnectioriall bye made with either Simpson L or T brackets, or Simpson A35 angles ; O O ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ t Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 k ' Fire Room t • It was observed that the small hex head screws were removed and replaced with the appropriate size lag screws as specified by CEC Submitted by: Jon M.Downing,EIT.r JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&.Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart r 4 r D:IDOCIC16600I16684116684011InspectionsIField Inspection Report 47.doc r E Small hex head screw replaced with the specified lag screw. Small hex head screw replaced with the specified lag screw.. .a y i u y r Blocking is needed between z joist hanger at Unit 1 floor '16 framing. W � ��� `�� a �'�� ������ a•" � � � rix r µ s: C16684.01 5/19/08 JMD/dlb 1 Q)NSTAL �� NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.Coasta-EngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 ■ Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT#44 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: Wednesday,Feb. 20,2008,at 12:45 PM Barnstable,MA Weather: cold,sunny,32'Ff Present at Site:- Mel Dishman-J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) / Steve-Shawnlee Construction - Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) Afield inspection was made per the request of Mel of J.K. Scanlan to inspect the wall framing in Units 3-4 located in B dii gAdo they may begin to insulate and sheet rock these units,the following was observed: Unit 3 • The trusses,which extend over the deck area,did not have the required plywood gusset connection at the outside end of the truss.According to Steve they are awaiting the information from the truss manufacturer,which they should receive by 02-21-08. • The Simpson L and T brackets were fully installed at header locations. • The roof framing at the CMU wall between Units 2 and 3 is comprised of roof trusses landing on the interior 4" wood stud wall.Additional studs were placed directly under the roof trusses as specified. • The roof trusses,which are next to the CMU wall,are not blocked at the lower chord,and should have blocking extending to the CMU wall as shown on Section I on A-S6. This blocking was in the process of being installed at the time of the inspection. • The valley beams at the back of the building that were not supported at the exterior walls had additional studs provided under the valley beam as specified. • It was observed that 2 Simpson SDS screws were present where the valley meets the ridge. These valley beams need to have the supports located in the wall below,extend up to the underside of the valley beam. • It was observed that the ridge beam had no mechanical fastening to the support element. CEC informed Mel that this can either be done with Simpson L or T brackets,or Simpson A35 angles. • The rafters which frame into the ridge beam did not have any hangers. Steve was informed to use the hangers,,, specified on sheet A-S4.1. , Unit 4 « _ • The trusses,which extend over the deck area,did not have the required plywood gusset Conn tion at the outside end of the truss(see above): C, • The valley beams at the back of the building that were not supported at the exterior walls,MU additional=studs provided under the valley beam. • It was observed that 2-Simpson SDS screws were present where the valley meets the ridge. ese vall beaus need to have the supports located in the wall below,extend up to the underside of the valley ams. ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 • The rafters which frame into the ridge beam did not have any hangers. Steve was informed to use the hangers specified on sheet A-S4.2. a • The Simpson L and T brackets were fully installed at header locations. • The steel column running from the basement to the 1 st floor appears to be offset from the steel column running from the 1 st floor to the 2nd floor.A 3'/2"x51/a"LVL post was placed under the steel column as detailed in SK-29 dated 9/28/07. General • CEC noted standing water around the steel column in the basement.This water should be removed along with any debris(See attached picture). CEC will inspect the condition on the steel columns and will provide any corrective measures that may be needed. • CEC informed Mel that he may proceed to sheet rock and insulate in Units 3 and 4,provided that the issues still left to be resolved can still be viewed for a final framing inspection. Submitted by: Jon Downing,E.I.T. JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart D:IDOCIC]66001166841166840]VmpectionslField impeclion Report 44.doc u t i + 4 ', ���' `� . f�: � 4 ��, �,nr o � •�! `ram ` . �, �_• 'S �. f _:.a++ � �'� CIA `CiJ'� a ' °fit du LVL post under steel beam in Unit 4 with Simpson connectors. LVL post under steel beam in Unit 4 with Simpson connectors. a� qq!! 2 Simpson SIDS screws used to secure valley beam .�, to truss. No connectors were added for the rafters. There are also no connectors for the ridge beam to the rafter. y C16684.01 2/20/08 JMD/dlb 1 a-11 d i W i Pt�A}�z j5 tr l 1j 1 ` gy Additional studs were added under the valley beam as LVL was in the process of being installed for blocking of the specified. truss bottom chord at the CMU wall between Units 2 and 3. IT ZI J' 2 Simpson SIDS screws used to secure valley beam d. .0 to truss. x' ( '✓ 1 . QP q 1 Simpson L and T brackets added at LVL header and post. w,✓, ` C16684.01 2/20/08 JMD/dlb 2 v T z 44 5 Cq w Cris COO « o cc w/ i j eu} ,, {x Cr F CD a ". � o uo `", ', No hangers or connectors to _• c ;� uotetn �, attach the rafters to the LVL. Simpson A35 and T bracket added at LVL beam and post. •'f - ; C16684.01 2/20/08 JMD/dlb 3 iOASTAL NGINEERING '= OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans'508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 M Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #23 .To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 . Location: 780 Crai Ville Beach Road Date/Time: .. Sept..26,2007 at.,1:30xPM Z... g _ .;. ., Barnstable,•MA Weather: �VVarm,�Sunny;65°Ff Present at Site: Jon Downing, Coastal Engineering Co., Inc. (CEC) Richard Scanlan, J. K. Scanlan Co., Inc. (JKS) Ray Devita(JKS) A field inspection was.made at the request of J K .Scanlan to verify form geometry and rebar placement for the spread footings in the crawl space underU.Unit 1 m Buil�dmg A".The following was`noted during this field inspection t ... 1. The spread-fdotmgs in the crawl space under Unit`1 in Building"A"were observed and the following was noted: a. -The footings appeared to be.located in compliance with the:construction documents b. Rebar in all F1 designated,footings appeared io..be 6-#5 bars.each way. C. All F1 footings appeared to be.4'-6".x 4'76'..'as specified d. Rebar in,all F3 designated footings appeared to be 445 bars each way: e. All F3 footings appeared to be 3'-0"x 3'-0"as specified. f.. All footings appeared to`have.3"clear to the soil and 2"clear to the sides of the forms.. g. All footing forms appeared to allow for the specified footing thickness. 2. Spread footings at the garage area of Building"A"were observed,and the following was noted: a. All footings for the HSS 4' x 415'x 1/4"columns were approximately 4'-6"x 4'-6". n t. b. All footings in this area appeared to have.6-#5,bars,each way. = (_n n c. All footings appeared to.have 37 clear to the soil and,2"clear to the sides of the form d. All footing forms appeared to.allow.for the.specified footing thickness. vA e.. A rebar was vertically placed in the,footing: Ray and Richard.were informed that these ebars are to be removed before pouring. These'rebars were still embedded in the ground upon leaving the site. C:) m 3. Footings for•the crawl space next to Unit 1 were observed and the following was noted: ;a.• ._,,,Footing width appeared to be 2'-6"as specified. b :Vertical dowels appeared tobe,#5 at approximately 16"O C ,with,a 15"hook C. Stepped footings had approximately a 2,horizontal tora_vertical slope.- i r . t': d' ' Rebarappeared to be 3"clear from the ground and 2"clear from the sides of the forms. ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ Trade,Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 September 26,2007 "Field Inspection Report#23 4. CEC inquired from Richard(JKS) if Briggs has tested the area under the spread footings for compaction and if the compaction was acceptable. CEC was informed that Briggs tested the area and that they were informed that the compaction was acceptable. CEC is awaiting the compaction test reports. 5. - The HSS 4"x 4"x 1/4"columns next to the CMU demising walls in Building"A"were observed and the following was noted: a. The columns which extend from the basement to the second"floor-are comprised of spliced HSS 4"x 4" columns bolted together vertically(see attached photos). CEC informed Ray(JKS)that this needed to be evaluated for stability issues and we will advise if this is acceptable. 6.-:The 2 steel beams to support the second floor in Unit 4 in Building"A"were observed and the following was noted: a. One end of the steel'column rested on one of the HSS columns mentioned above. b. The other end of the beam rested on a stiffened seat angle bolted through the CMU demising wall (see. attached photo). This detail needs a written descriptive to be submitted to CEC, as this support detail differs from-original design documents. -- If you have any questions regarding the above,please contact our office. Submitted by: clSourt.�Z�L Jon Downing,.EIT Date JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart D:IDOCIC16600116684I16684.01IInspectionslField Inspection Report 23.doc I 1 x 4 n .. � f.5►�� {� d�'iS is ��' i� ° a\d d r�l�i- � + .. r „r.+ T e 4 .°.4 ✓& r41"!r s� to S bY" �� t .y,n Sj.yp, I ISKa _ _ , 1 �. n ,ql�'rW. rti r "+ 7,'" ,tS 1. t `""1-.�, ` y' 1 l �.,.+ , � M ..� -'��rEr � iyg-�i tr s � h A x,+4�`f }!"� ,.�.tr .y� ygt- 1t16yi 1�, g# to t�g.ya�,� .. F• ES F k r'�a.� " A•. `°�d,s4 + a e r'`k�a�'�"�"� 4^; tit^., p7 �1� ,�'}��'t<""�'"�y,.Sy, °c��'�a �`��r-:�� �i F��S '� !". A4,..��j�� y,... 4 ^yt}.� ,,_ .�+.•i x �'^,�. �5 !.+ r' tl— —All rt d. e & t 4W„, IF,t. y, 'f d • Stiffened seat angle J supporting second r , HSS 4x4 at demising wall connection. ., „ floor beam � ,� - o )rp ��- obi in- r AI IP'IE 'I'd* fk �,� L 9 xF.r. r•,-T� - st ss� C16684.01 Trade Winds Insp. 23 9/26/07 JMD/dlb 1 OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 2 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEn ineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 M Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis•=508F 7719¢00 m Fax 508-255-6700 .STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #45 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigvilfe Beach Road Date/Time: Monday,Mar. 03,2008,at 1:30 PM Barnstable,MA G'VI��P� Weather: warm; sunny-,45'Ff Present at Site: Mel Dishman-J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) Steve-Shawnlee Construction Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) A field inspection was made per the request of Mel of J.K. Scanlan to inspect the final framing in Units 1-4 located in B-ulldmg"A'�-the following was observed: Building;«A?` • The;floonframi R,,and sill conditions 4.1.U,rt;i were no t',bts6rved;:due4o limited access to"tl e crawrspacc: The.-'°. i-,-,-,-:framing in this location needs to be inspected prior to CEC signing off for the framing. Moderate to severe molding was observed on the underside of the floor sheathing.CEC was informed.-that steps would be taken to mitigate the :issue. • SDS screws were observed.to attach sorrie of the exterior walls to the sill.-It was`observed at the remaining exterior walls that there were nails from the:bottom of the wall to indicate that Sirnpson LS90 clips were used to attach the exterior walls to the.sill.The framers informed CEC that when installing the' L'S90 clips they noticed water entering the basement at the southwest foundation wall. Unit 2 •. The roof trusses,which extend over the deck area,had the required plywood gusset connection at the outside end of the truss as specified by the truss manufacturer. • The roof framing at the CMU wall area between Units 2 and 3 is comprised of roof trusses landing on the interior 4" bearing wood stud wall.The roof trusses had additional studs placed directly under the roof trusses. • The roof trusses;which are next to the CMU wall,were blocked at the lower chord as shown on Section I on A-S6. • It was observed that two of the LVL headers in the exterior wall were missing the T bracket. Steve,was informed of this;_and the bracket was placed prior to CEC leaving the site. Unit 3 The:tnisses;whichiextend oyerithe,deck,had the regii'red'plywood gusset:connection`at Chetoutside end of the'truss. 6�.ij The roof trusses,which are next to the CMU wall,were blocked at the lower chord,as shown on Section I on A-S6. • It was observed that 2 Simpson SDS screws were present where the valley meets the ridge. These valley beams is rie'ed'ed to-,have the supports located in the wall below extend up to the underside to the valley beam. It could not be observed if this was completed due to the drywall already being placed. As noted in Inspection Report 44 these ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 areas were to be left open. Scanlan shall submit a written document on company letterhead and submit to CEC to indicate this work has been completed. • It was observed that the ridge beam had no mechanical fastening to the support element. Connection shall be made with either Simpson L or T brackets, or Simpson A35 angles. • The rafters that frame into the ridge beam did not have any hangers. Proper hangers as specified on sheet A-S4.1 or Simpson A35 angles shall be installed. Unit 4 • The trusses,which extend over the deck area,did not have plywood gussets added at the end.Based upon the manufacturer's stamped calculations these trusses do not require the.plywood gussets. • It was observed that 2 Simpson SDS screws were present where the valley meets the ridge. These valley beams needed to have the supports located in the wall below extend up to the underside to the valley beam. It could not be observed if this was completed due to the drywall already being placed. As noted in Inspection Report 44 these area were to be left open. Scanlan shall submit a written document on company letterhead and submit to CEC to indicate this work has been completed. • The rafters that frame into the ridge beam did not have any hangers.The proper hangers as specified on sheet A-S4.2 or Simpson A35 angles need to be installed. " • It was observed that the ridge beam had no mechanical fastening to the support element. Connection shall be made with either Simpson L or T brackets,or Simpson A35 angles Unit 5-8 • The plywood gussets for the roof trusses were placed as specified by the truss manufacturer.The plywood gussets were 29"x 20"with 3 rows of nails at approximately 4"o.c. General • CEC noted standing water and debris around the steel column in the basement. This water should be removed along with any debris(See attached picture). CEC will inspect the condition on the steel columns and will provide any corrective measures that may be needed. Building"B" • The plywood gussets for the trusses in Units 9-12 were observed.The gussets were 29"x20"with 3.rows,of nails approximately 4"o.c. Building"D" • It was noted that one of the steel columns,which are at the garage area by building A was leaning,and that the anchor bolts pulled out of the concrete. It appeared that one of the anchor bolts had snapped(see attached picture). This condition needs to be reviewed by CEC prior to continuing construction of this building. Submitted.by: Jon Downing, E.I.T. JMD/dlb r cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart" w. 144 Sill in the mechanical room of Unit 3 had nuts placed onto the Plywood gusset plates added to trusses as specified by the Sill. truss manufacturer. � qqpp x No hangers were on rafters ' and no attachment was - ,— found on the ridge beam to �t ., * � ' the header. U " M; Debris and water present around the steel columns. C16684.01 3/3/08 JMD/dlb 1 sip j a �r j y. 4 rnr K ..'T9 Y RT� q } i Nuts have been added to secure the sill to the foundation. Typical plywood gusset on the specified roof trusses. Y x Simpson Land T straps missing at 2 LVL headers in Unit 2. Ceiling joists are attached to the truss at every other joist. These straps were placed prior to leaving site. C16684.01 3/3/08 JMD/dlb 2 .W y w. N� ,.�_�� ,j ,� .-� �� r, rya,• y .��. ,� y; � � +AW RP soyri � .,43Fic„Ac « �'' .' v �. & 4♦ O fir w r��r '� �'�(,. " 9+7 .. f *rsd No SIDS screws or LS 90 clips present due to sheathing Nail protruding from bottom plates indicated that Simpson LS lapping 16". 90 are likely installed. lk As rAx � ''fie � 0'�•.�!" �S-^^"^'�`�R 4s i f � 4' A W rti �7 i � > 4 :' V jvrH "'h `* a' ��" Gta ..s .,ae"_...•, • l a ,: #� ,. `� � ^• , '.. �+"' u .. rr'� is - f v ti ,,�^. ❑ � �,r sNr rc t r , SIDS screws present at the exterior wall of Unit A. SIDS screws present at the exterior wall of Unit A. C16684.01 3/3/08 JMD/dlb 3 s Fa f r y f ,Q rrts •#r'i. . `.d'' r'"*� .r1 4 �{F ,.*a., " e. i«, �� �' � � �R�Ft;; tt � ?���.1.�4 �'hy�Ji;. ?��,. ��' •��'� .�� ° G`/."'+ � t.$ d yt '.d�!Tcw�. SIDS screws present at the exterior wall of Unit A. SIDS screws present at the exterior wall of Unit A. w t �S r F: Nailing of the plywood gusset to the truss. Blocking between joists as specified. C16684.01 3/3/08 JMD/dlb 4 r �s d +Y^sw.M'+ �eI Simpson T bracket placed at LVL header in Unit 2 where Nailing of the plywood gusset to the truss. bracket was missing. r 1. c 1W'y i a y`i Y 4U , A YP r � r LS 90 nailed similar to an LS50 was on both sides of the LS 90 nailed similar to LS 50 was present on each side of the double truss. (2)truss. C16684.01 3/3/08 JMD/dlb 5 J i s .fix �` ,.j' , � l I ,�r• . a� A. � ' r y R ty � eJr''''k° �: ,��'�.��� �„ _y$ t;•s..—.�f'^"` j T - .,,.�..w.+r _ h �- `I R � .•" yr. :+ •'F '�"` "�'�'!"nT" � pa,'.-" ~.�4'� _..�p J' arc """ft � .�`� °#' `' '" ' � „ �"�`fir"," < yy "� ' s�'�t �'�•; 'Ab.� -& .�: `�i� rn,.... • +" _ 6�_� n t.- . ."io K*�'<'»jy,��� r�p'!e$�y V. �} � .a =w�a�s y� "� ��K:t`. }1 ,',� r '. i� Y'^' r...prt �..y.�� i ��. f•-� � �i 7 n Y 1 p.4t� "\ "� .M r4.✓� a . •-T � kf '►'naf� 'yam, I +f'{ f,I t � �.{YF i n11�1Y! ~++s �, *A°A' ,sz 'A' �k*" ��r.. r�r �"- yY„ �•:. #� �r`.yir n <�ya 5.(? � `.. a � �:�Ys ;... ""�•er`�5x,„ s�rtx ��.�lK a: a � '.aF+.� � T4T�_1�4�T�t y �y"d �...y.�j', .gib •�r `'" k* � 1u.. ~ �+`+` s ti y "A�. x }r t J�S',' �<'� .ta �}2 tt Area in front of Unit 1 where there is reported water Area in front of Unit 1 where there is reported water infiltration. infiltration. 2 t r4 •Y 4 E r .y. iij I A�'Y, [' r +�R, • G �sf ��e��'b�f�` l.A 3��7 ti,.".J� � - Column pulled out of concrete at Building "D". Note that one of the bolts snapped, the others pulled out. C16684.01 3/3/08 JMD/dlb 6 _ t ASTALGINEERING ANNS "AMPANY, INC. 70081MA Y 27 PM 12: 04 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte.6A),Orleans,'MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 ■ Hyannis"5ft-�47 ■ Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD REPORT #46 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: Wednesday,May 14,2008,at 9:00 AM �1 Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, Sunny, 559 Ff �✓ Present:.at Site: l 0 Jim Hudson-J.K.Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) i A field inspection was mad er the request of J.K. Scanlan to inspect the final punchlist items and to perform a final walkthrough foiiBuildings. ;and_`C';the following was-observed: Building"A" ;. Unit-1,. .'.^t;t;..•.:r a. '. �.,. ,,. t .i., • ; :The floor framing appeared to be framed in accordance with CEC plans and the approved shop drawings`with the �. . following exception.The LPI-20 I joists,which frame into the LVL beam at the front of the building,used Simpson HU412 hangers,�,instead;of:the specified Simpson HU312 hangers.The Simpson HU412 hangers are too wide for the I joists and need to be removed and rep laced.with:Simpson HU312 hangers. • The.Simpson LS90 angles were placed at the sill to the•rim-board,and the rim boardto the wall above. Unit 2 • A set of stairs was being built to the deck at the front side of the building. It was observed that.no footings were .placed under the main support posts for the landing. CEC recommended to Jim that footings'.be placed to prevent settling of the stairs.Jim informed CEC that it is his intent to place footings to support the stair landing. Unit.3:: • It was observed that 2 Simpson SDS screws were,present where the valley meets the ridge.These valley beams needed.to have.the supports located in the wall below to.extend up to the underside,of the valley beam.,It could not be. observed if this was completed due to the.drywall.already being,placed.'As noted in Inspection Report 44 these areas were to be left open. Scanlan-shall.submit a written document on.company letterhead and submit to CEC to indicate :this work has been completed. • It was observed that the ridge beam had no mechanical fastening to the support element. Connection shall be made with either:Simpson,L or_T brackets; or Siinpson A35.angles <. - • The.rafters that frame into the ridge beam did npt•have any hangers Provide proper`hangers as"specified on sheet A- S4 l or Simpson A35,4ngles scs. ;,rf .•k n , , _.: .�,is 1�,F .. t a r 1- ti s, Unit 4 4 i�.r: ts..r .3�.s.S ..:r rkz4y l.S.x : ?• at *,-% It was observed that 2 Simpson SDS screws were present where the valley meets the ridge.These valley beams needed to have the supports located in the wall"below to extend up to,the underside to the valley beam. It could not be ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 observed if this was completed due to the drywall already being placed.As noted in Inspection Report 44 these area were to be left open. Scanlan shall submit a written document on company letterhead and submit to CEC to indicate this work has been completed. • The rafters that frame into the ridge beam did not have any hangers.Provide proper hangers as specified on sheet A- 54.1 or Simpson A35 angles. • It�was observed that the ridge beam had no mechanical fastening to the support element. Connection shall be made with either Simpson L or T brackets,or Simpson A35 angles • The mechanical fasteners at the first floor porch could not be observed due to finishes. Scanlan shall submit a written document on company letterhead to CEC,which indicates this work has been completed. Unit 5 • It was observed that the existing steel beam,which is shown on CEC plans scheduled to be cut to a cantilever on each side,had one side of the flange cut above the stairs to the basement.It appears that the flange may have been torch cut. Unit 6 • It was observed that the existing steel beam,which is shown on CEC plans scheduled to be cut to a cantilever on each side,had one side of the flange cut above the stairs to the basement. It appears that the flange may have been torch cut. General • CEC noted that the steel columns in the basement had concrete placed around the base.It appears that a bond breaker was used at the base of these columns. • The LVL beam in the fire room bears on top of the steel column and is attached to the steel column with 2 lag screws and 2 hex head screws(refer to picture).Remove the hex head screws and replace with the appropriate size lag screw. Building"B" • A final walk through of Building"B"revealed no issues that need to be resolved. Building"C" • The plywood gussets for the roof trusses in Units 13-15 were observed. The gussets were 29"x20"with 3 rows of nails approximately 4"o.c. • A final walk through of Building"C"revealed no issues that need to be resolved. Building"D" • It was noted that the CMU walls already placed had steel wire from the top of the wall extending to the steel angles and foundations on either side.. Submitted by: Jo" n D ning,E.I.T. JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart D:IDOCICI6600116684116684011InspectionsIField Inspection Report 46draft.doc r v Simpson LS90 at underside of Unit 1 LVL to steel column connection at underside of Unit 1 AN, � �� "tom""* + - � t• r re. < 7 �►.. -_ n ,t d .�»; �-�• 1-joist at front side of * building. Note hanger is too ,.. ' wide for joist. Padding was =*F provided. ,, , E iw►l Concrete was placed at steel column base where water and debris was previously noted. C16684.01 5/14/08 JMD/dlb 1 t. Y �4 T + w yd • 4 ` t,: '' Awn.. y,y .. �•� d ...1 ;x.., '-+.�+•... , P ILL I-joist at front of building in Unit 1. Note that hanger is too LVL beam resting on concrete in beam pocket. wide. No pad was provided. r. I One side of the bottom flange was removed from the steel beam. In Unit 5 <„ and 6 CEC called for the portions of beam over stairs to be removed. t; One side of bottom flange removed from steel beam at Unit 5 and 6. C16684.01 5/14/08 JMD/dlb 2 yy 7 - ,Sl r � 4 7 R ' r �a r . ,aw"��,;,,< .a...•,J'�Y�:+� +try �.s �Y�. � sr' �. Au 1 L No connection of ridge to support. Connector not added as specified at ridge beam. L — ��.1. "sa} anti+OE SIN e �1 ' Connection not added .: as specified for ridge y (4)-2x8 lumber on side of to support. LVL beam-appears to support deck. C16684.01 5/14/08 JMD/dlb 3 �r r t — ^��tfx 1 ✓� " o,m k! r AF is •.l Plywood gusset plate as specified in Building "C" No ridge beam to support connection in Building "A" 77 . k- ` x ) • i Fz a` i 1 k I y ..m f � Small hex head screws with oversize washer at column in fire No footings under stairs to Unit 2 deck protection room C16684.01 5/14/08 JMD/dlb 4 f .OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #28 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: October 24,2007,at 9:30am ' Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, Overcast,65°Ff Present at Site: �j Chad B.Hill,Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. CEC �Q l 1 g g Inc.'(CEC) l�I Ray Devita,J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) David Robbins,J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc.(JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of Dave Robbins(JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for three of the "bigfoot"footings in front of'bui-1-d! —`A". Also Dave had asked for an inspection on the seat connection detail that was revised and corrected on 10/10/07(SK-30). • It was observed that"Squarefoot"footings were substituted for the specified"Bigfoot"footings.This change has been previously approved by CEC. • All vertical rebar appeared to be 545 bars equally spaced with 12"long hooks and 2"clear as specified. • All circular ties appeared to be#3 bars spaced 10"O.C. as specified. • The base soils appeared to be compacted as specified. • All sonotubes appeared to be 16"dia.and approximately 4'-8"deep as specified. —; • The seat connection detail located.on the rear side of building"C"appears to be in accordance with SK-30`,--howev_er, the angle design calls out for a 3/16"weld on each side that has not been performed. CEC will advise on how to:x' proceed. ' • CEC also observed the finish siding being placed and or completed on the front face of building`I'B"prioCt—o any . resolve with the shear wall design issues. :. J Submitted by: — ' cx: Chad B.Hill Date Structural Engineering Technician CBH/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ P t ` .�1 1 {� t� f 1� f • r � Yy'! � ' r r � ,� �, ,'^tL 'r I �'�' I. IIN�� r1 , � r jA jp 4 M 27 r= a, .tom �� t• � � Y.X' ��... "' wles. � �° , 3dn - iJ C16684.01 10/24/07 CBH/dlb 1 _ t y 4 nil w n ., s l � wu C16684.01 10/24/07 CBH/dlb 2 - IPA y' _. .r.3R ,.�r �`' � F.S.,i �'�"�+Ae;-..� c f-�'� �� / "'f ��• �� *. I� .a`.'�. J 4 } C16684.01 10/24/07 CBH/dlb 3 OASTAL , NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 M Provincetown 5087487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 M Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #32 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: November 19,2007,at 12:30 AM Barnstable,MA Weather: Overcast,40'Ff Present at Site: Chad B.Hill,Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc.(CEC) Ray Devita,J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc.(JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of Ray Devita(JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar placement for all foundation wall footings at Building"E". Also,nailing of the exterior wall sheathing at corners of B_�ui� 'i�ding A was 's. inspected. • All footing form and rebar geometry appeared to be sized and placed in accordance with CEC plans. • Footing dowels appeared to be#5 bars spaced at 16"O.C.with the specified hook size as on CEC plan. • Transverse rebar in footing appeared to be#4 bars spaced at 16"O.C. as specified. • Longitudinal rebar appeared to be 344 and 444 bars,3"clear from bottom and equally spaced as specified. • All forms appeared to be placed on the existing`sand-based soil,which appeared to be compacted or properly proof-rolled. • All footing forms appeared to be 12"thick as specified: • All stepped footings appeared to have a 2:1 step with a typical 30 bar lap as specified. • Footings at detail E/S-6 have been modified to match the typical wall footing as detailed on B/S-6. • The nailing sequence at the comers of building"A"appeared to be 4"O.C.throughout the entire length at each corner. • It was obvious that the gaps between all wall panels at building"A"were not yet filled and nailed off. Ray (JKS)and Steve(Shawnlee)were reminded of this by CEC. Submitted by: .1� Chad B.Hill Structural Engineering Technician CBH/sms cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart D:IDOCIC16600116684116684011InspectionslField Inspection Report 31.doc ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ 1 � �v..r��3 �i 1' •� °t � ,,� `j S""°"v" � 1 T G - • � _ _ �.� i•-�![yv ..ti 4�'.a �s,�,�=�/`-si' '- jam' -�ix"��"� •.iis�� ���^�•`�"�ak'�--.tea •-�.._ ,,.� 1''�`►., �,I 1 '�Y ay. +••.. 1 t•,�7'� � ,�y• l 1' +=-1u ���i � �' r 4 1 a' 1 fAtfe` `e�a� � ,i. {.� ZL � - - ��••�"t.y L- :Lt9 ...•,�: .+'C• r Y " y- -. «-. '; �,+...�.:, ,� Fla,:"�• « tS x �x . .. "°,... ,k , � ,�., z .t * .'=�°zaY .y Y ., n ryYG.• '4v'1. , ` t rt si.f' ,',y ,/.��y�J�. •.a2y n,.�,A.a �. -YF �„n,.,�� xM`4 �., Y ,A J' � s�' ,f} a t /J,1Y' Y 'Y*�,r •. •5 Lr. ., x* i 6e —A ,• , �,t', rxy. I�fr'. t 31�uk S" � "�;�" i•d9-. � �;.. � .t.,d ��� y r i�" l Syr >+�'.�'�"" � �.x 4a ill�a G�,#r,; °,a, `'a" � � ,Y.�,"'g'fi�'XL� y w� '• ,.• .,.4"�a. ,,Sates, �' � � r,� yM.,_.,w ".�,�.:."'z.,pr�.. y. � ��,.,!3,^ x; � i -liFrv�,y�J •+,� Rftv J 4-4 H P ti x 79+ �, � ,�.:.�7 aa+ 1L�. � +,x� ,+•t e � .. }. .�. � {�' �A d }F"�4 '.6 + ..�� a'�>� .�F. 'S ° y C16684.01 Tradwinds/Craigville Beach/Barnstable November,2007 CBH 4.. �� �..�. � �F'W'�'!„1 x 3• i� � ri _I� lei f r"� _� •�.^.. s! .�"n � .4-Vt' s4rr rG�, t}�i(a jJ- �. J iq. rr'l _ f� +, #;" � .� "�;;,�_ �•"r � '.+.� � ..,tea "" .r :�'a� ,�-. �"'i.,?:-. ;. `:,L .�`". I'°It .a, � �...�.:..�,: rry� �', 'f as �� �" «�+: ,y �w �8t '`•�f .�'.�y ,t ,y �' � *' ._� .� >'-•� — iy�, ; ; n SSA... .. 's§ 3•r yy �,a M I y 4�,. .Ar•� . r-,,YY5a ,A�,y •«'.,r; �'� r �,.: �J' - t �'rt i;Q'„�r¢;'Y'.4� j +�k�S' .`'ra , , - 4 iz a � r � 1 WL ♦ _� - Y,�,.,.f µ. J -_ V. .. �� 'i�� A � Rl�t �� �� �<A K Y� td ��¢ 1•P .�'F i a •�. s" ,� +��^ r s�"' _.'ma`s`. h « r C16684.01 Tradwinds/Craigville Beach/Barnstable November,2007 CBH p '1 } l a#'ci++. '�'r•rc;,wv�""1 � -. 3" 'yam,.. r r i�. r'"s K"b+•R v't•• tit rG ,... ,a M _ r .. r d ` * Pis 7 "4 �77 �$"?u`�.wy'.t�,tt ;R.. `t`y; � z �w.wy, .T+a.,.._ 4�,. •rT ,h.liT+byrt � "Yaww �. f , r g - a `hA3� ��, 3."9'; _zyw., � •r ,� d° L" �•s.3�.". �;. ,r ^..- ,y„. ,'� Fw ; •,.-..�,�. .♦ y,]F r t L� � � ��. �Ik.T�. ��'3T �wf�' i�r'k's�`�"?s w � o' � �,5.��..-.,,y, �-� r. y: ,�6. R ,. ..C"� �„�„.,."wrrs 1�P� ,•� ,1i, `t4 ti -_ x. w "• ��r I , ��'£ :.�" ,- `; '"mow ,.�"'�"..,�.-,. �.«� �•� � ,+ -: ,.j* r^ �c?ix' k B, 4,1 .,„y, r* 2^ �RaFr M1 r v �r :�."• "µa'�,�w"�¢, p,,r `'w, t'tir.y ,w' .�' e +r""•"•r+.+..rCL,'�< '''� �t r`�` 't. �' ��} -' .r' ..�.. �,.i I��'. �„;� v...H. R� ±�•` i "Fr'"�"' r r� �,apC M, �' 'e, 7.1+.. � i � d a•�s.} F- -"',��.,,�..w..,..,y'r - � . ai •�. �� i�r.rl�� � � *t. 4 ems✓,^ Mom• j�� •t� � •r �r {-'� r' >pp7 '*" h•' �' r -�+,re"' o-. cs R�' F � .. „�.l�ki^,w,•t..tit� ,�y,'`5, •- c` r}� �c' `,Sa. �� ^"-::'� s �.r _ .: < "'� ��^ `+ .r _ � •. ��� yam,, r C16684.01 Tradwinds/Craigville Beach/Barnstable November,2007 CBH N SIC J.,Y`o ..a t: — � �s -e«� s ..' �Y��1��1� �wt�, "'*.a.G�"`Fr �l ti.9"fq+ - �•wMq�r� �r— r� 1 �� . n mom A " •. K .ifs -� ��� r�,- c I�,a, r s• '. I19h�1+� `TRh^1��11.' �+. - w� � � IIC^ �uz_."�� ' .![�Y S h&'."d� :w ,.. � ,'!. � +• �V Gar+ i+ .e�.s �,,, �" V'/ - '�� �w,ev R�t¢!. #�,.�."ev:.(}y1....<.. R*a".,`��fRl t� ?' 1..�. S;'."�°' S '_. �x 1 -.-.•..H.4.. � �h ,Tt 1 —', � :� ���!+ Zia bc 4 fill'' 10,�III 1, } •t. Ca:t lIYM' .Gv. t � f low pro j < r+ • a a '- t �+ 13 a iplga w y t 34? a E a+ .^a<yi4tw`S `y� .,#•�,wwF,,... i�rr .r. ''' — +... was „ P,..• "�..t �! oA, �.,„ N ... ,.—_ �i a �,`1 it �44.tt�777 w } • � Aft ` ��� Y • .. �Y 4�, f .1,5� ��-) �l �S A'. Al Mg " �';T 777LLLfff��� 1�' •a7.. t : ' � ��. "1 � f• i"�^,.ywJ� �<, r r« 1 syk ,,� l ^F� IM �.,+Ln�a ,y "v ..+<.f.••.w- "�" i"._ �4y All, yi th{ '�~ • j , to ¢ v u Fjfd�� �' v, '� rr1314?if", Ae&Er a.*`" �:F do. '1•r� ' ' ,'"L a + s t.+."F 'f^r s?. �r. .. ... y. - � �y ?r{..�,��.7�1 -a tr r�,.+�r43 +a<<�a ],� �r a � a 7�:.� e��, s' d9w ♦� k v. .. P, Fy''�" i.;• { -.., +,.�; '.>•� - 11 ,». «...`�� 'r l�"`�'"'' r %KAa 4 tr 1 riJ r 5y � '+� .g - �� �� ' '..wt ""� •#v 'y� p �,� � �,;7��rj'•tii � . y ''fir .': y. ._ .n'r..c s X +i Y G, <. r��j• i {r ey •? i •t .. �� ....'.. /°P ` y'h,:d.. `;a •,.. �� �r ..,�,�, ~gt 1A 1.r f0. a:14* r. aia, �^L,_ .-. `" � t _ t , 7 tr' 'P C•a°l:`t i�.�x�,y 1 y� .� 1.,�? .1�,a f�- Pc. 1� � a F + �i��p �. i i 4e++a—�1.......,�.,,. - `f ... s i. x.+"r 'r". ;.s �+ F`f����� r��" l!"jy' , ��`f��� #ys � • � +`j �}k ,,�'., T � � Is t rJ711-1 x 7� j X �y� C16684.01 Tradwinds/Craigville BeachBarnstable November,2007 CBH c _ ° l r 1AKS r 44 TI 1" r f +� �w _ - , 1 ; !i rug : 3h S" s �. ,.;A �'"!' "v� a �i ►"" , ++ For AN i 'a } F�,:Tucim ✓ '� ; ,�np8. Y yF r ° e . �........ �9„ C16684.01 Tradwinds/Craigville Beach/Barnstable November,2007 CBH Gym(l q lo t s TOWN OF BARNSTABLE N ILDING PERMIT APPLICATION �b Map Parcel `9 Q® Aieation# ^ vrc `-"��� Ith Division � -- 17 7 /7 ZI Conservation Division �' ?.�� G� O '��®q 00 I Permit#� . Tax Collector Y � Date e fC� iL d5 Treasurer 'QO A p"cTion Fe `7 Planning Dept. @�► 7l� �' mit Fee' Q Date Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board t'Historic-OKH A) & - Preservation/Hyannis project Street Address 780 Craigville Beach Road Lau A )6 C b 1 � Village Centerville Owner Lily Pad LLC Address P.O. Bog 447, Centerville, MA 02632 Telephone 508-280-7966 Permit Request Demolition of existing building down to the first floor deck. 5 Square feet: 1st floor:existing proposed 7,750 2nd floor:existing proposed 7,750 Total new15,500 Zoning District RB Flood Plain Groundwater Overlay ! {a /Project�',aluation I a�J� Construction Type Plui l►1 'Lot Size� 43,560 Grandfathered: ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, attach supporting documentation. Dwelling Type: Single Family ❑ Two Family ❑ Multi-Family(#units) 8 Age of Existing Structure Historic House: ❑Yes O No On Old Kings Highway: ❑Yes ❑No LO ` Basement Type: ❑Full ❑Crawl ❑Walkout ❑Other M Basement Finished Area(sq.ft.) Basement Unfinished Area(sq.ft) t Number of Baths: Full:existing new Half:existing new Number of Bedrooms: existing new Total Room Count(not including baths):existing new First Floor Room Count Heat Type and Fuel: ❑Gas ❑Oil ❑ Electric ❑Other Central Air: ❑Yes ❑No Fireplaces: Existing New Existing wood/coal stove: ❑Yes ❑No Detached garage:❑existing ❑new size Pool:❑existing ❑new size Barn:❑existing ❑new size Attached garage:❑existing ❑new size . Shed:❑existing ❑new size Other: Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization ❑ Appeal# Recorded❑ Commercial ❑Yes ❑No If yes,site plan review# Current Use Proposed Use {..__.,-BUI:.DER INFORMATION Name John Scanlan Telephone Number 508-540-6226 Address 15 Research Road License# CS O40692 Last Falmouth, MA 02536 Home Improvement Contractor# Worker's Compensation# WC1-111-258096-036 e ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING I FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO "'1 A SIGNATURE DATE 4tS, FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ' PERMIT NO. ~� J DATE ISSUED MAP/PARCEL NO. ADDRESS VILLAGE r s ' OWNER t- J � DATE OF INSPECTION: FOUNDATION ' FRAME INSULATION FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL: ROUGH FINAL PLUMBING: ROUGH FINAL GAS: ROUGH FINAL FINAL BUILDING' • 7 DATE CLOSED OUT ASSOC ATION-PLAN NO. ,. -C) Dot.: 1 s D 17 v 5O7 10-31-2005 BARNSTABLE LAND COURT Rf=G,IS.�RY 9ABNSfAw'� HAM. � I fp MCi► J Town of Barnstable `n Zoning Board of Appeals Decision and Notice Appeal 2005-065 - Special Permits -Tradewinds Inn Section 240-94A, change of a nonconformin ngg use to another nonconformi use r= and Section 240-93B, alterations/expansions in preexisting nonconforming building or structure. To change,extend,alter/re-construct a nonconforming 46 bedroom hotel&restaurant to 21 unit multi-family development. . Summary: Granted with Conditions Petitioner: Tradewinds Inn _. _ Property Address: 780 Craigville Beach Road,Centerville,MA r Assessor's Map/Parcel: Map 226,Parcel 140-1 Zoning: Residence B&Residence C Zoning Districts Relief Requested & Background: The locus is the "Tradewinds Inn", a 46-bedroom commercial hotel and 125-seat restaurant. The use of the property is nonconforming as it is a commercial use located within single-family zoning districts. The applicant.is seeking to redevelop the property's multi-family with 21 two-bedroom townhouse units and Y ' associated site improvements including parking, a swimming pool and tennis court. The Inn encompasses two lots, as shown on Assessor's Map 226,parcels 140-001 and 140-002, addressed 734 and 780 Craigville Beach Road, Centerville. The two lots total 5.51 acres and are developed with four principal buildings. Both lots are owned by the Archer Realty Trust, Alan-Isenstadt,Trustee. Today, the applicant is seeking special permits for one of the two lots -Assessor's Map 226, parcel 140-001 which is the larger of the two lots containing 5.28 acres and three of the four structures—aka 780,760 and 760A Craigville Beach. The applicant is seeking to convert`those three strictures totaling 16,807 sq.ft. of living area and containing the restaurant, to 21 two-bedroom townhouse units. - From the plans presented, 21 indoor garage spaces are proposed and 27 outdoor paved parking spaces are' provided for the residents and visitors. In addition to the tennis court, a 20 by 40 foot outdoor pool is planned and two screened dumpsters are provided for.the 21 units. Two curb-cuts, one an entrance drive and the other an exit drive, are proposed. A third curb-cut.is to be gated and used only for emergency access. , Procedural & Hearing Summary: This appeal was filed at the Town Clerk's Office and at the Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 18, 2005. An Extension of the Time Limits for holding the public hearing and for the filing of the decision was executed between the applicant and the Board Chairman. A public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals was duly advertised and notice sent to all abutters in accordance with MGL Chapter 40A. The hearing was opened August 10, 2005 and continued to September 14, 2005,at which'time the Board found to grant the special permit with conditions Board Members assigned were, Gail Nightingale,`Randolph ' Childs, Sheila Geiler, Jeremy Gilmore, and Chairman Daniel M. Creedon L u Attorney Michael Ford represented the Applicant before the Board.. Also present was Craig Short;P,E. and- Mr. Gordon Clark,Northside Design Architects. Mr. Alan Isenstadt;Trustee of the Archer Realty Trust was also present during the hearing. Mr. Ford noted that the applicant is seeking a special permit to change a nonconforming restaurant/hotel into a 21-unit condominium complex(multi-family) with each unit containing 2 bedrooms. He cited that the area of the buildings would also be altered and expanded to accommodate the new use. He presented a brief - history of the property,predating it to 1929 when it was the Wainright Estate. .He explained the existing conditions of the nonconformities. Mr. Ford stated that the site is located in an environmentally sensitive area and the wetland and health issues constrained much of the development...Mr.Ford stated that the change from commercial hotel to multi- family would be more compatible with the neighborhood. With reference to the initial plans presented, Mr. -Ford noted that the applicant is still working,with Site Plan Review and the Building Commissioner to assure all requirements are met. He presented the plans noting that the buildings on site would be raze and replaced with a series of connected buildings. The plans have been approved by the Conservation Commission and by the Board of Health. Mr.Ford noted that more site area.-would be preserved as a buffer to the wetlands and that on-site wastewater disposal would be reduced from 8,700 gal.per day to 4,620 gal.per day.as calculated under Title V. Mr. Short noted that the proposed septic system will treat to 15 ppm at the edge of the property. Parking needs of 95 spaces are needed and there are only 86 spaces. There was discussion about the reduction of parking on site and putting more into impervious. Traffic will be less than that of a motel etc. because the units will be privately owned. There would be a less intense use even during the summer. Plans for the units and buildings were presented by Mr. Gordon Clark of Northside Design. He addressed the issue of the number of stories and cited that: there'will be no living space is in the attic area, there will be only 2 floors of living area, and the buildings will conform to all zoning and building code requirements for the intended use. The Board and Mr. Ford discussed the plans initially presented with the applicant. Changes were requested and the applicant agreed to investigate those changes and prepare plans for review., The Board questioned what was the applicant's plans were for the smaller lot. Mr.Ford stated that the applicant is aware that there no longer could be a nonconforming use and it would have to conform to- single-family use. However, he suggested that the structure on this smaller lot could be used for affordable . units as the affordable requirement would have.to be satisfied prior to the issuance of the building permit Public comment was requested. Tony Balsamo,President.of Christian Camp Meeting Association reads letter expressing concerns for Lake Elizabeth and'neighborhood beautification. Jim Lane,.President of Redly Apartment Association stated that the Tradewinds offers a positive proposal. Gabrial Facker, Clergyman, Craigville Village, alsocited concerns for'Lake Elizabeth:- Charles Marshall, a Member of Craigville Beach Road Association sited concerns for the location and its environment. Wayne Kurker, direct abutter supported the proposal. Also.speaking in support were; Kevin O'Neil, John Pendergast, Jr., John Troy,Tim O'Keefe, Stefan Seidner and Mrs. Julia Gavitt. Mr. Seidner"did cite concern regarding traffic and pedestrians and Mrs. Gavitt,noted concerns for certain design aspect's. The Board requested the applicant look into those issues when the plans are further refined. The hearing was continued to September 14, 2005. 2 At the continuance, it was noted that Board Member,Jeremy Gilmore was not present and if the applicant proceeded with a four member board all of the votes would have to be in the affirmative for a grant of the 'appeal. Mr. Ford agreed to proceed with the four members present. At that continuance, revised site and architectural plans and a September'14, 2005 Memorandum from the Building Commissioner were received. The Board and.applicant reviewed those plans and a short summary of the proposal was presented by Mr. Ford. Public comment was requested and a Mr. Gerald C. Tucke of 20 Marie Avenue spoke in opposition: He' stated that he had not received public notice. The Board reviewed that issue and it was determined that he was not within that area required under MGL Chapter 40A for notification to be sent. He expressed •concerns that recent improvements in the area had led to flooding in his basement and he was concern that the proposed development would exasperate the situation. The Board determined that'a condition should be imposed that all drainage from the site would be contained on the site. . Findings of Fact: At the hearing of September 14, 2005, the Board unanimously made the following findings of fact: 1. Appeal 2005-65 is that of the Tradewinds Inn for property addressed 780 Craigville Beach Road, Centerville, MA as shown on Assessor's Map 226,Parcel 140-1. It is in a Residence B and C Zoning Districts. 2. The subject lot is the "Tradewinds Inn", a 46-bedroom commercial hotel and 125-seat restaurant. The use of the property is nonconforming and the applicant is seeking to redevelopthe property as multi- family with-21 two-bedroom townhouse units and associated,site improvements including parking, a swimming pool and tennis court. 3. According to the Town of Barnstable records, the Inn encompasses two lots, as shown on Assessor's Map 226,parcels 140-001 and 1.40-002, addressed 734 and 780 Craigville Beach Road,,Centerville. The two lots total 5.51 acres and are developed with four principal buildings. 734 Craigville Beach is developed with a single building of 2,990 sq.ft.,built in 1958. 780 Craigville Beach is developed with` three structures totaling 24,686 sq.ft., apparently rebuilt in 1952. The larger structure, 18,9517sq.ft. houses hotel rooms, and a 125-seat restaurant. The two smaller structures on the lot(aka 760 and 760A Craigville Beach) apparently house additional hotel rooms. There also exists a dilapidated shed on the property. 4. Both lots are owned by the Archer Realty Trust,Alan Isenstadt,Trustee. Both have been owned by the Trust since June of 1972 as'evidenced by deeds recorded in the Barnstable Registry of Deeds as Certificate Nos. 55074 and 55075. Both of the lots are also subject to the same mortgages and in December.of 1987 were.granted.Special Permit.1987-84 to allow for the expansion of the nonconforming use. That permit was issued to Jeff Sol lows and Douglas Lebel as Trustees of S,L.S. - Trust,however, it was never implemented. 5. The applicant is seeking a special permit for one of the two lots,780 Craigville Beach Road, containing 5.28 acres and three structures-aka 780, 760 and 760A Craigville Beach. The applicant is seeking to convert the property+to 21 two-bedroom townhouse units. The proposed new.buildings are described as: - 41 . .. 3 , • `Building A", estimated at 226 by 36 feet, converted to 8 living units within the existingtootprint (Unit Nos. 1 to 8). • `Building B 1" and`Building B2" a new structure estimated to measure 136 by 40 feet- The two halves are connected by a covered roof structure and each half is to be two units for a total of 4 living units, (Unit No.s 9, 10, 11 & 12). • "Building C"is a proposed new structure, estimated to measure 96 by 40 feet and containing 3 . living units (Unit No.s 13, 14 & 15). "Building D" is also a 96 by 40 foot building containing 3 diving units (Unit No.s 16, 17 & 18). • > `Building E"is located to the eastern side of the property and estimated to measure,110 by 40 feet containing 3 living units, (Unit No.s 19, 20 &21). 6. From plans presented,Buildings A through D are three level structures with parking garages on the lower level (with the exceptions of the lower level of Units No. 4; 5, 6,7, 8, and 16). Building E appears to contain garages and living area on the lower level with bedrooms above. 7. In addition to the 21 indoor garage spaces, there is one space provided in each of the garage drives plus ; 27 uncommitted outdoor paved parking spaces for a total of 69 on-site parking spaces for the residents and visitors. In addition to a proposed tennis.court, a 20 by 40 foot outdoor pool is planned and two screened dumpsters are provided for the 21 units. 8. Revised site plans for the development consisting of a total of seven (7) sheets have been submitted to the file. Those plans consist of Sheets I to 5 entitled"Proposed=Construction for Tradewinds" as drawn by Craig R. Short,P.E., dated July 26,Last revisedSeptember.13, 2005, scaled 1"=30',plus two R addendum sheets. Copies of which have been entered into the file. F , 9. In order to qualify as a pre-existing legally-created,nonconforming use the use must predate the 1929 inception of zoning in the Town of Barnstable. A 1922 recorded plan (Land Court Plan 8993A) shows that the lot existed at that time, and the then existing structures located upon the lot. The size of a larger building would suggest that a use other than single-family residence.may have existed at that time. That lot appears to have remained until the,1952 division of the land as per Land Court Plans 8993B and , 8993C. 10. Section 941) of the Code of the Town of Barnstable-Inclusionary Affordable Housing requires two. units of housing to be dedicated in perpetuity as affordable. The applicant has agreed to meet this requirement to the satisfaction of the Barnstable Housing Committee. 11. With respect to the requirements of Section 240-94A: * On January 25, 2005, the Board of Heath approved the proposed on-site septic system. That system was approved with dimensional variances to the location of the soil absorption system. • Regarding required parking, the existing use would require a minimum of 98 parking spaces. The y proposed 21 multi-family units would require only 35 on-site parking spaces according to the - Zoning Ordinance. • Traffic generations from°a 125-seat restaurant and a 41-room motel would be considerably more than that generated for a 21-unit multi-family development. 4- i • The proposed change in use would certainly not result in an increase of'on-site and off-site noise, ` dust and odors, nor increase the hours of operation, number of tenants or number of employees. 12. With regards to the requirements of Section 240-94B: the proposed new buildings meet the required, front, side and rear setbacks. However, the location of two'of the new structures do not comply with the . required 35-foot setback from wetlands. Building A,is located as it now exists, non-conforming, in that it is only 28.4 feet off the wetlands. Building E, that is to replace an existing structure,located 10.68 feet from the wetlands, is proposed at 30.23 feet. Although not conforming to the requirement of 35• - feet, it is less intrusive than that which exists. In effect, the proposed alterations_ make it less nonconforming and more in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance overall. 13. This application falls within a category specifically excepted in the ordinance for a grant of a Special Permit. 14. After evaluation of all the evidence presented, the proposal fulfills the spirit and intent of the Zoning.. Ordinance and would not represent a substantial detriment to the public good or the neighborhood affected. 15. A site plan has been reviewed by the Site Plan Review Committee and that^plan can be found approvable. Decision: Based on the findings of fact, a motion was duly made and seconded to grant the appeal with the following conditions: 1. This permit is issued in accordance with Section 240-94A,change of a nonconforming use to another.nonconforming use to permit a nonconforming motel and its accessory uses to change to a multi-family use and Section 240-93B, alterations/expansions in pre-existing nonconforming building or structure to permit the structures located on the site to be altered and expanded. ` 2. 780 Craigville Road, Centerville. Assessor's Map 226, parcel 140-001 shall be limited to no more that 21 two-bedroom multi-family townhouse units and associated site improvements including parking, a swimming pool and tennis court. Development of the site shall be in accordance with plans submitted to the Board, entitled"Proposed Construction for the Tradewinds" as drawn by Craig R. Short,P.E.,dated July 26, 2004, last revision date of September 13, 2005 and consisting of 5 sheets plus two addendum sheets. 3. The buildings to be built on the lot addressed as 780 Craigville Beach Road shall be as presented to the Board in plans submitted entitled'"Proposed Tradewinds.Town Houses, Centerville MA"as drawn n by North`side Design Associates dated 9/2/05 and consisting of 12 sheets., 4. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Section 94D of the Code of the Town.of Barnstable-Inclusionary Affordable Housing that will require two units of housing to be`dedicate& in perpetuity as affordable. 5 5. Unless the Barnstable Housing Committee determines that another option exists to satisfy the F Inclusionary Affordable Housing requirement and subject to approval of the Barnstable Housing Committee;734 Craigville Beach Road, Centerville -Assessor's Map 226,paicel`l'40=002 sliall�be limited to one structure containing a two-family dwelling,(townhouse type units)-to satisfy the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Requirements of Section 9-4D of the Code of the Town of Barnstable. Those two units shall dedicate in perpetuity to affordable housing units.To only be sold or rented to qualified households in accordance with the requirements of the Ordinance. . 6. All of the structures shall conform to the residential height limitations and number of stories for the • Zoning District and conformity as determined by the Building Commissione'r.`_The.area of the.attii` space shall'b"e structured so that it is not usable as-a-habitable area.- --- 7. ' Each of the units shall have a deeded or assigned garage space: 8. Development of both lots shall conform to and be maintained with any Order of Conditions issued r or to be issued by the Conservation Commission: 9. On-site septic shall conform to all requirements of the Board of Health , 10. Development shall conform to all applicable fire and building requirements for the use. 11. All development shall conform to the Section 240-34-Flood area provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 12. The Master Deed shall include restrictions that the attic area and the garage area shall not be converted into habitable space and that the number of bedrooms shall not be expanded beyond that permitted by this decision. The Master Deed shall also contain all restriction, contained in this decision. 13. The units shall not be rented for less that a'period of three months. This restriction shall be imposed on the applicant and incorporated into the master deed and bylaws of the association. 14"In.the event that the Inclusionary affordable units are to be located at 734 Craigville Bea'&Road, then prior to the issuance of the 10`h and 20`h occupancy permits to.the 21 unit development on 780' "Craigville Beach Road;one affordableunit occupancy.permit must.be issued for an affordable unit i on 734 Craigville Beach Road. ' 15. All mechanical equipment associated with the dwelling(air conditioners, electric generators, etc.) shall be located sous to conform to the required setbacks for the District and screened'from neighboring homes and the public right-of-way. 16. During all stages in the demolition and reconstruction on the property,°all vehicles; equipment and materials associated with the demolition/reconstruction shall be required to be located on-site and not within the required setbacks. At no time will any parking, storage or construction materials or items be permitted in the right-of-way of Craigville Beach Road and Marie Avenue. ' + 6 �, 17. The extent of development authorized in this permit shall be considered.full build-.out for the lot and the buildings and structures shall not be expanded in area or in footprint nor shall any other „ accessory structure be permitted without further permission from the Zoning Board of Appeals. 18. This decision must be recorded at the Barnstable Registry of_ Deeds and a copy of that recorded document must be submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals Office and to the Building Division before any demolition or building permit is issued. The relief authorized must be executed within one year of the grant of this permit. 19. All run-off shall be contained on-site. w 20. All lighting shall conform to the guideline of the Cape Cod Commission. The vote was as follows: AYE: Gail Nightingale,Randolph Childs, Sheila Geiler,Daniel`M:Creedon NAY: None Ordered: , Special Permit 2004-65 is granted with conditions. This decision must be recorded at the Registry of.Deeds - for it to be in effect. The relief authorized by this decision must be exercised within one year. Appeals of this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 17, within twenty (20) days after the date of the filing of this decision, a copy of which must be filed in the office of the Town Clerk. Daniel M. Creedon III, Chairman Date Signed I,Linda Hutchenrider, Clerk of the Town of Barnstable,Barnstable County, Massachusetts, hereby certify that twenty(20) days have elapsed since the Zoning Board of Appeals filed this decision and that no appeal of the decision has been filed in the office of the.Town Clerk. Signed and sealed this�_day o under`the pains a d penalties,of perjury. Linda Hutchenrider, Town,Clerk 1781441° j NSTAR SUM SW3080A NSTAR SUM SW3080A 01:08:40 p.m. 09-25-2006 212 P CIS PROD P778 PENDING ORDERS 9BY ACCOUNT JMW , 13:00 .09/25/06 14`f 1-2^a77-0015 DIV 72 E R ASC . 3135 LSO URFY-083095 TRADE WINDS INN INC OPEN BAL 0.00 LUC 780 CRAIGVILLE RD RUG BILL 208.00 CRED AO AO W HYANPORT 02672 COMMENTS P A NXT/RD/DT 10/17/06 H (508) 775-0365 MAIL CY .12 RTE 536 PREMISE DIG IN PVT UG SVC DUG UP CAP 8 REFUSED 24/65 NOT CUST COMMENTS: PLEASE CALL .775-0355 MR ISENSTADT # ORDER DESC STATUS TAKEN ORD# LAST UPOTE - 1 SOFF-REM SENTBATCH-080806 K55-072606 06085953 081 06- SCO-080806 2 EXCHANGE SENTBATCH-071806 POI-061306 060667215 061305-AT DLT-071806 3 MISC VOIDED -071806 SOC-083002 021255842 090302-AT DLT-071805 4 CANCEL/REBILL SENTBATCH-072005 KKM-072006 060827477 000000- -000000 5 CANCEL/REBILL _ VOIDED -072006 KKM-072006 050827465 000000- KKM-072006 SELECT ORDER NUMBER: _ ACTION: _ PAGE 01 (ACTIONS: C=COMPLETE, R=REVISE, I=INQUIRY, H=HISTORY, V=VOID) PF01 : HELP PF02: FIND PF07: BACK PF08: FORW PF09: G+E NEXT: FIND x 1781441f14, 377-0015 NSTAR SUM SW3080A NSTAR SUM SW3080A 01:08:40 p.m. .09-25-2006 212 CIS PROD P778 PENDING ORDERS •BY ACCOUNT JMW 13:00 09/25/06 DIU 72 E R ASC 3135 LSO VRFY-083095 TRADE WINDS INN INC OPEN BAL 0.00 - LUC 780 CRRIGUILLE RD AUG BILL - 208.00 CRED A0 , A0 W HYANPORT 02672 COMMENTS , P A NXT/RD/DT 10/17/06 H (508) 775-0365 MAIL CY 12 RTE 536 PREMISE DIG IN PUT UG SVC DUG UP CAP & REFUSED 24/65 NOT CUST COMMENTS: PLEASE CALL 775-0365 MR ISENSTADT # ORDER DESC STATUS TAKEN ORD# LAST UPDTE 1 SOFF-REM SENTBATCH-080806 K55-072606 06085953 081406- SCO-080806 2 EXCHANGE SENTBATCH-071806 POI-061306 060667216 061306-AT 'OLT-071806 3 MISC VOIDED 7071806 SOC-083002 021255842 090302-AT DLT-071806 4 CANCEL/REBILL SENTBATCH-072006 KKM-072006 060827477 000000- -000000 5 CANCEL/REBILL _ VOIDED -072006 KKM-072006 060827465 000000- KKM-072006 PAGE 01 SELECT ORDER NUMBER: _ ACTION: (ACTIONS: C=COMPLETE, R REVISE, I=INQUIRY, H=HISTORY, V=VOID) PF01 : HELP PF02: FIND PF07:, BACK PF08: FORW PF09: G+E NEXT: FIND t r O SEP-26-2006 TUE 10:25 AM KEYSPAN ENERGY FAX NO, '508 394 5019 P. 01 r KeySpan Energy Delivery Erw rjjy 1-16i'e",jy 127 Whites Path South Yarmouth,MA 02661 September 26, 2006 O Whorl it may concerlt: Re: 780 Craigville Beach Rd., Hyannis This letter is to confirm that we have cut and carped the gas service at the fiats box and removed the muter to the above referenced property on 08/08/2006. ]Cyou should have any questions, I can be contacted directly at 508-760-7502. —�i� -•crt,ly, r Joh"Inne 011e1101t0 field C'oordhiator Cape, Division r SHIFMAN DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. Plumbing and Fire Protection Design Services 141 Cross St. Stoughton, Mass. 02072 781-344-6743 FAX 781-344-3847 Trade Winds Condominium 780 Craigville Beach Road Building"A" Centerville,Massachusetts In accordance with 780 CMR: State Board of Building Regulations and Standards,Article 9, paragraph 903.1.1.La: The project consists of the construction of the alterations of 'the existing building converting this building, which will be known as Building "A", into condominiums. In addition, the project requires the construction of four additional buildings to be known as Building "B", Building "C",Building"D"and Building "E". At present, Building"A" is . protected with sprinklers. The sprinkler system in Building "A" will be dismantled and new systems constructed to conform to the new architectural design for the new condominiums. The existing sprinkler water service will be relocated to a new location where it will be provided with the proper equipment. From this location the sprinkler water main will extend from building to building located on the site. The sprinkler systems for each condominium will be individual and separate fed off the service main mentioned above through"floor control stations". Each floor control station will be equipped with a control valve,flow switch and drain and test valve. The attics of all condominium units will be protected with a glycol system through an anti- freeze loop located in a heated space in the unit. The sprinkler systems for the building is designed in accordance with 780 CMR,Chapter 9 and NFPA#13. The service main will be equipped with a backflow preventer with shut off valves, alarm station and fire department connection. There is provided strobe lights, one for each condominium unit to provide a visual indication in the event of a fire in that unit_ The sprinkler system will be completely automatic consisting of quick-response,low flow, glass-bulb sprinkler heads. In the event of a fire the sprinkler heads)will actuate allowing . water to flow. The movement of water within the piping system will initiate an alarm and initiating the strobe light The system components will be maintained periodically and tested annually by allowing water to flow through a test valve until an alarm is sounded. a 1 r SHIFMAN DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. Plumbing and Fire Protection Design Services 141 Cross St. Stoughton, Mass. 02072 781-344-6743 FAX 781-344-3847 August 2, 2006 Building Inspector Inspectional Services Division Building Department Centerville, MA Re: Building"A„ From: Shifman Design Associates, Inc. PLUMBING DESIGN SYSTEM AFFIDAVIT` I herebythat the design of the plumbing systems in Building"A" for the Trade certify l� P g Y g Wmds Condominium project located at 780 Craigville Beach Road, Centerville, Massachusetts, as prepared by this ffice was designed in accordance with the requirements State of sach Plumbing and Gas Codes. Signed by: Date: 17, 6P and dent Subscription sworn to before me thisL24-day of , 2006. ZH OF, LIS BETH HOFFMAN - DAMES y Notary Public P. C monwealth of Massachusetts STROKE =aMY Commission Expires . No.20068 My commission expires Jul 4 20 k ------------------- 08 1 °•'C LYE �Ru•� ,F r HIFMA IASSOCIATES,S N DES GN INC. Plumbing and Fire Protection Design Services 141 Cross St. Stoughton, Mass.02072 781-344-6743 FAX 781-344-3847 August 2,2006 BuildingInspector Inspectional Services Division Building Department. Centerville,MA Re: Building"A" From: Shifrnan Design Associates,Inc.' SPRINKLER SYSTEMS DESIGN AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that the design of the sprinkler systems in Building"A" for the Trade Winds Condominium project located at 780 Craigville Beach Road, Centerville, Massachusetts, as prepared by this office was designed in accordance with the requirements of the State of Massachusetts Building Code and NFPA Standards#13 and ` 20. Signed by: Date: ar S ' resident Subscription and orn to before me this day of ,2006. P OF I,1 Cy o`er JAMES G 7C ' H HOFF AN rn o STROKE , saaxs'et3 ry Publicv No.20068 ,X�` w� � ;` lf;f .,,fh of Massachusetts ission.Expires Mycope ssionexpues4,200b _ MECHANICAL ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION CONTROL AFFIDAVIT Project Number:NA Project Name: The Residences at Trade Winds Project Title: Building`A' Project Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road,West.Hyannisport,MA Scope of Project: Construction of new residential condominium units In accordance with paragraph 116.0 of 780 CMR,the Massachusetts State Building Code, 1, W/4 LiN�y 14 gd/o'Od s/ Massachusetts Registration Number 12 OS3 being a registered professional Engineer, hereby states to the best of my knowledge and belief, that all Building`A' mechanical plans dated 07/11/06, computations and specifications, and changes thereto, involving subject project will be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a Massachusetts registered professional Engineer and bear his or her original signature, as defined by Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L.)a 112, 81R. For the above named project, I, or my authorized representative, will review the design concept, shop drawings, samples and other submittals which are submitted by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. ; I, further state that 1, or my representative will be present on the construction site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with progress and quality of the work and to determine-, in general, if the work is being perfonned in a manner consistent with the construction documents. I, or my authorized representative, will submit, periodically, a progress report with all pertinent comments of the site visits and compliance of all pertinent items to the building official. I, or my authorized representative, eport as to the satisfactory completion and the readiness of the project for occupancy,i Ssq WILLIAM mm Engineer o Date SfONAI_�G\� Subscribed and s e ore me this a1 day of 20,0 . o?O o201J Public Date Public Commission Expires JENNiFER L'GILL Notary Public Commonwealth of Massachusetts My Commission Expires June 20,2008 SEP. 27. 2006 2:41N. JK SCA NIL A,N COMPANY 1NCv'11 r N0. 92k-2006P. 2 2n 6089574ou's N6imn rr%r%MOUTi� 01:�2:336.m. NSTAH GAS Or►e NSTAR Way,Westwood,Massachusen 02000-9�t3 27 September 2W6 Ward Jaros IX Scanlon Company, Inc Falmouth Technology Park 15 Research Road E.Falmouth,RSA 02536-4440 RE: NSTAR Wools Order#1533681 790 Crai9v7ille Beach Road, Hyannisport Meter#5099174 Service pole 24/63 Dear Mr.Jaa;os, This letter will serve as c0 fL*mation that the electric utility service to the building at 790 Craigv111e Beach Road,Hyannisport was removed from the utility poles. Based on Haas information,there is no electric power to this building and yov may proceed with the di a,molition. Sincerely yours, AceQurit Executive One NSTAR Way SW 340 Westwood, MA 02090.9230 Office:781-441-8717 Mobile,389-987-8286 Fax: 781-441^yy 94 ®Mail Vicki Marchan rgstarwline corn l r - ,Centerville-Osterville-Marstons Mills Water Department P.O.BOX 369- 1.138 MAIN STREET OSTERVILLE,MASSACHUSETTS 02655 Ot E OV w� c OFFICE OF u WATER M BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS WATER SUPERINTENDENT ?i DEPT. TEL.No.508-428-6691 9�STONS FAX No.508-428-3508 August 2, 2006 Town of Barnstable Building Dept. 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 , Re: Account#2339 Trade Winds Inn - "Domestic Water Service" _ - 780 Craigville Beach Road Centerville, MA t _ Gentlemen: On Tuesday, August 1, 2006 we turned off the water for the"domestic water service", pulled the meter and disconnected the water service at the curb stop for the "domestic water service" at,the property mentioned above.•The water line for the"fire service" is turned off at the curb stop near the street but the line still goes into the foundation. Our ofcewas notified'that the structure was being demolished, leaving the - foundation in place. If you have any questions, please call our office at,508-428-6691. Very truly yours, Herbert Mc Sorley Assistant Superintendent HLMCS/jw { The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents Office of Investigations 600 Washington Street Boston, MA 02111 Y www.mass.gov/dia Workers' Compensation'Insurance Affidavit: Builders/Contractors/Electricians/Plumbers Applicant Information Please Print Legibly Scanla K. Name (Business/Organization/Individual): J.K. Company, Inc. Address: 15 Research Road City/State/Zip: E. Falmouth, MA 02536 Phone g. 508-540-6226 Are you an employer? Check the appropriate bog: Type of project(required): 1.❑ I am a employer with 4. ® I am a general contractor and 1 6. ®New construction employees(full and/or part-time).* have hired the sub-contractors 2.❑ I am a sole proprietor or partner- listed on the attached sheet. $ 7• ❑ Remodeling ship and have no employees These sub-contractors have 8. ® Demolition working for me in any capacity. workers' comp. insurance. 9. ❑ Building addition [No workers' comp. insurance 5. ❑ We area corporation and its. required.] . officers have exercised their 10.0 Electrical repairs or additions 3.❑ I am a homeowner doing all work right of exemption per MGL I L❑ Plumbing repairs or additions myself. [No workers' comp. c. 152, §1(4), and we have no 12.❑ Roof repairs insurance required.]t employees. [No workers' 13.0 Other comp. insurance required.] *Any applicant that checks box#1 must also fill out the section below showing their workers'compensation policy information. t Homeowners who submit this affidavit indicating they are doing all work and then hire outside contractors must submit a new affidavit indicating such. ' $Contractors that check this box must attached an additional sheet showing the name of the sub-contractors and their workers'comp.policy information. I am an employer that is providing workers'compensation insurance for my employees. Below is the policy and job site information. Insurance Company Name: Liberty Mututal Policy#or Self-ins.Lic. #: WC1-1 1 1-258606-036_ y Expiration Date. 8/31/07 780 Crai ville Beach Road W. Hyannisport, MA Job Site Address: g City/State/Zip: Attach a copy of the workers' compensation policy declaration page(showing the policy number and expiration date). Failure to secure coverage as required under Section 25A of MGL c. 152 can lead to the imposition of criminal penalties of a fine up to $1,500.00 and/or one-year imprisonment, as well as civil penalties in the form of a STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of up to$250.00 a day against the violator. Be advised that a copy of this statement may.be forwarded to the Office of Investigations of the DIA for insurance.coverage verification. I do hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the information provided above is true and correct . Signature Date: September 21, 2006- . Phone# 508-540-6226 Official use only. Do not write in this area,to be completed by city or town official City or Town: Permit/License# Issuing Authority(circle one): 1. Board of Health,2. Building Department 3. City/Town Clerk '4. Electrical Inspector 5.Plumbing Inspector 6. Other Contact Person: Phone# , r Information and Instructions Massachusetts General Laws chapter 152 requires all employers to provide workers' compensation for their employees. Pursuant to this statute,an employee is defined as"...every person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written." An employer is defined as"an individual,partnership, association,corporation or other legal entity, or any two or more of the foregoing engaged in a joint enterprise, and including the legal representatives of a deceased employer, or the receiver or trustee of an individual, partnership,association or other legal entity, employing employees. However the owner of a dwelling house having not more than three apartments and who resides therein, or the occupant of the dwelling house of another who employs persons to do maintenance, construction or repair work on such dwelling house or on the grounds or building appurtenant thereto shall not because of such employment be deemed to be an employer." MGL chapter 152, §25C(6)also states that"every state or local licensing agency shall withhold the issuance or renewal of a license or permit to operate a business or to construct buildings in the commonwealth for any applicant who has not produced acceptable evidence of compliance with the insurance coverage required." Additionally,MGL chapter 152, §25C(7)states"Neither the commonwealth nor any of its political subdivisions shall enter into any contract for the performance of public work until acceptable evidence of compliance with the insurance requirements of this chapter havebeen presented to the contracting authority.", Applicants Please fill out the workers' compensation affidavit completely,by checking the boxes that apply to your situation and, if necessary, supply sub-contractor(s)name(s),address(es)and phone number(s)along with their certificate(s)of insurance. Limited Liability Companies(LLC)or Limited Liability Partnerships(LLP)with no employees other than the members or partners, are not required to carry workers' compensation insurance.. If an LLC or LLP does have employees, a policy is required. Be advised that this affidavit may be submitted to the Department of Industrial Accidents for confirmation of insurance coverage. Also be sure to sign and date the affidavit. The affidavit should be returned to the city or town that the application for the permit or license is being requested, not the Department of Industrial Accidents..Should you have any questions regarding the law or if you are required to obtain a workers' compensation policy,please call the Department at the number listed below. Self-insured companies should enter their self-insurance license number on the appropriate line. City or Town Officials Please be sure that the.affidavit is complete and printed legibly. The Department has provided a space at the bottom of the affidavit for you to fill out in the event the Office of Investigations has to contact you regarding the applicant. Please be sure to fill in the permit/license number which will be used as a reference number. In addition, an applicant that must submit multiple permit/license applications in any given year, need only submit one affidavit indicating current policy information(if necessary)and under"Job Site Address"the applicant should write"all locations in (city or town)."A copy of the affidavit that has been officially stamped or marked by the city or town may be provided to the applicant as proof that a valid affidavit is on file for future permits or licenses. A new affidavit must be filled out each year. Where a home owner or citizen is obtaining a license or permit not related to any business or commercial venture (i.e. a dog license or permit to burn leaves etc.)said person is NOT required to complete this affidavit. The Office of Investigations would like to thank you in advance for your cooperation and should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call. The Department's address,telephone and fax number: The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. P.epattm ent of Industrial Accidents, Of�i-ee of Investigations, 600 Washington Street B'osto NIA,02,1 1 Tel. # 617-7274900 ext.406,or 1-8'77-MASS.AFE, Fax#, 617 727-7749, Revised 5-26-05 www.mass.gov/'dia r This certificate is executed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Group as respects such insurance as is afforded by those companies. BM0068 Certificate of Insurance This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon you the certificate holder. This certificate is not an insurance policy and does not amend,extend,or,alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed below. This is to certify that(Name and address of Insured) J.K.Scanlan Company,Inc. •h 15 Research Road `` �Ve East Falmouth,MA 02536-4440 mutuoym is,at the issue date of this certificate,insured by the Company under the policy(ies)listed below. The insurance afforded by the listed policy(ies)is subject to all their terms,exclusions and conditions and is not altered by any requirement,term or condition of any contractor other document with respect to which this certificate maybe issued. Ex iration Type Eff./Ex .Date(s) Policy Number(s) Limits of Liability Continuous* 08/31/2006/08/31/2007 WC1-1 1 1-2 5 8096-036 Coverage afforded under WC law of Employers Liability the following states: Extended Bodily Injury By Accident X Policy Term CA,MA,NH,OK $1,000,000 Each Accident Bodily Injury By Disease r $1,000,000 Policy Limit Workers Compensation Bodily Injury By Disease $1,000,000 Each Person 08/31/2006/08/31/2007 YY2-1 1 1-2 5 8096-0 1 6 General Aggregate-Other than Prod/Completed Operations General Liability $2,000,000* Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Hx Claims Made $2,000,000*Occurrence Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability Per $1,000,000 Occurrence Retro Date Personal and Advertising Injury Per Person/ $1,000,000 Organization Other Liability Other Liability Med.Pay$10,000 Fire Legal$300,000 08/31/2006/08/31/2007 AS2-111-258096-066 .Each Accident-Single Limit.-B.I.and P.D.Combined Automobile Liability $1,000,000 Each Person X Owned X Non-Owned Each Accident or Occurrence X Hired -Each Accident or Occurrence C *Per project and per location combined aggregate limit of$2,000,000 with cap.of$10,000,000. O Employee liability limits for CA are:1,000,000/1,000,000/1,000,000.--Job Number:0616Residence at Trade WindsAdditional Insureds:Lily Pad LLC&Archer Realty M Trust M E N I - S *If the certificate expiration date is continuous or extended term,you will be notified if coverage is terminated or reduced before the certificate expiration date. However,you will not be notified annually of the continuation of coverage. Special Notice-Ohio:Any person who,with intent to defraud or knowing that he/she is facilitating a fiaud against an insurer,submits an application or files a claim containing a false or deceptive statement is guilty of insurance fraud: Important information to Florida policyholders and certificate holders:in the event you have any questions or need information about this certificate for any reason,please contact your local sales producer, whose name and telephone number appears in the lower left comer of this certificate. The appropriate local sales office mailing address may also be obtained by calling this number. Notice of cancellation: (not applicable unless a number of days is entered below). Before the stated expiration date the company will not cancel or reduce the insurance afforded under the above policies until,at least 30 days notice of such cancellation has been mailed to: Office: WESTON,MA-SOUTH Phone: 781-891-8900 Certificate Holder: CLARE HALLAHAN Paul LeBel Authorized Representative Lily Pad LLC' t P.O. Box 477` + Centerville, MA 02632 Date Issued: 09/01/2006 Prepared By: KS r '000- Igor KEENAN+KENNY ARCHITECTS, LTD. ARCHITECT CONSTRUCTION CONTROL AFFIDAVIT Project Number:NA Project Name: The Residences at Trade Winds Project Title: Building `A' Project Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road West Hyannisport MA Scope of Project:Construction of new residential condominium units In accordance with paragraph 116.0 of 780 CMR,the Massachusetts State Building Code,1, Antonia A.Kenn A.I.A Massachusetts Registration Number 5446 being a registered professional Architect, hereby states to the best of my knowledge and belief, that all Building `A' architectural plans dated 07/11/06, computations and specifications, and changes thereto, involving subject project will be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a Massachusetts registered professional Architect and bear his or her original signature, as defined by Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L.)c. 112, 81R. For the above named project, I, or my authorized representative, will review the design concept, shop drawings, samples and other submittals which are submitted by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. I, further state that 1, or my representative will be present on the construction site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with progress and quality ,of the work and to determine, in general, if the work is being performed in a manner consistent with the construction documents. 1, or my authorized representative,will submit,periodically, a progress report with all pertinent comments of the site visits and compliance of all pertinent items to the building official. 1, or my authorized representative, will submit a repo to the satisfactory completion and the readiness of the project for occupancy, if re requested. ®0�°0 �File®� q * aED AFi�y®®, � �OENZ t N0:5446 P (1 ! ......r,, .6ARNSTAELE, • ��°Ob '°° URI� C'''� Architect Date a gjL �Z �ro< .0 IVLY 79 Fj � °'� Subscribed and sworn to before me Tis9AS8 _day of 200(61-0 0 OA �°'• V8LIC iP�a �upa No ublic Date Notary Public Commission Expires 189 Main Street Suite 2A Falmouth, MA 02540 508.540.0075 TEL 508.540.0079 FAX kk.arch@verizon.net r STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION CONTROL AFFIDAVIT Project Number: NA Project Name: The Residences at Trade Winds Project Title: Building `A' tH OV&q.9 Project Location: 780 CraiQville Beach Road,West Hyannisport,MA RAN i9N. y No.45391 Scope of Project: Construction of new residential condominium units A��,�9F0/STER����� S�ONAL E�6 In accordance with paragraph 116.0 of 780 CMR,the Massachusetts State Building Code,I, CG David A.Morand,P.E., SECB Massachusetts Registration Number 45391 being a registered professional Engineer, hereby states to the best of my knowledge and belief, that all Building `A' structural plans dated 08/10/06, computations and specifications, and changes thereto, involving subject project will be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a Massachusetts registered professional Engineer and bear his or her original signature, as defined by Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L.)c. 112, 81R. For the above named project, I, or my authorized representative, will review the design concept, shop drawings, samples and other submittals which are submitted by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. 1, further state that I, or my representative will be present on the construction site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with progress and quality of the work and to determine, in general, if the work is being performed in a manner consistent with the construction documents. I, or my authorized representative,will submit,periodically,a progress report with all pertinent comments of the site visits and compliance of all pertinent items to the building official. I, or my authorized representative, will submit a report as to the.satisfactory completion and the readiness of the project for occupancy,if requested. Id d 8". Engineer Date ,'ar'ns4a66, s 5 (20k,»-,onwped4-L- A46SStei" u Subscribed and sworn to before me this J day of 20 6 4 vo tary t1blic Date Notary Public Commission Expires SUZANNE M. SULLIVAN ` Notary Public Commonwealth of Massachusetts MY Commission Expires Apr 3,2009 r` ELECTRICAL ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION CONTROL AFFIDAVIT. Project Number:NA Project Name: The Residences at Trade Winds Project Title: Building `A' Project Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road,West Hyannisport.MA Scope of Project: Construction of new residential condominium units In accordance with paragraph 116.0 of 780 CMR,the Massachusetts State Building Code,I, ROBERT WOOLSON Massachusetts Registration Number 34601 being a registered professional Engineer, hereby states to the best of my knowledge and belief, that all Building `A' electrical plans dated 07/11/06, computations and specifications, and changes thereto, involving subject project will be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a Massachusetts registered professional Engineer and bear his or her original signature, as defined by Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L.)c. 112,81R. For the above named project, I, or my authorized representative, will review the design concept, shop drawings, samples and other submittals which are submitted by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. I, further state that I, or my representative will be present on the construction site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with progress and quality of the work and to determine, in general, if the work is being performed in a manner consistent with the construction documents. I,or my authorized representative, will submit,periodically,a progress report with all pertinent comments of the site visits and compliance of all pertinent items to the building official. I, or my authorized representative, will submit a report as to the satisfactory completion and the readiness of the project for occupancy,if requested. 8 -�7- a6 En ' eer Date Subscribed and sworn to before me this I Ilk day of 20 09 /1re.e 4, Notary Public Date Notary Public Commission xpires r -T4 Qammwnu�ea �✓�aaaac� BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS License: CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR Number:CS, 040692 Ez`pire 09/06/200`8 Tr.no: 1428.0 M.t Re'strifti 06- JOHN K SCANLA[ 15 FERNWOOD RD`\ NO FALMOUTH, MA`05i C Commissioner - T 00-35,000 cf enclosed space (MGL C.112 S.601-) i to-Masonry only ;1G-1&2 Family Homes i Failure to possess a current edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code i is cause for revocation of this license. 1 I DIG SAFE CALL CENTER: (888)344-7233 u. License or Permit Bond Bond Number 929410120 Continental Casualty Company it A National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford ppnu � rt� tl American Casualty Company of beading, Pennsylvania CNA Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60685 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,That we J.K. SCANLAN COMPANY, INC. of 15 Research Road, East Falmouth MA hereinafter referred to as the Principal, and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of South Dakota and authorized to do business in the State of Massachusetts as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, MA hereinafter referred to as Obligee, in the sum of TWENTY THOUSAND AND 00/100 ($20,000.00). Dollars lawful money of the United States of America,to the payment of which sure,Welland truly to be made,we bind ourselves, our executors,administrators,successors and assigns, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That whereas,the Principal has made application for a license or permit to the Obligee for the purpose of or to exercise the vocation of Street Opening NOW,THEREFORE, if the Principal shall faithfully comply with all ordinances, rules and regulations which have been or may hereafter be in force concerning said License or Permit, and shall save and keep harmless the Obligee from all loss or damage which it may sustain or for which it may become liable on account of the issuance of said license or permit to the Principal,then this obligation shall be void; otherwise,to remain in full force and effect.. THIS BOND WILL EXPIRE September 25, 2007 but may be continued by continuation certificate signed by Principal and Surety.The Surety may at any time terminate its liability by giving thirty(30)days written notice to the Obligee; and the Surety shall not be liable for any default after such thirty day notice period, except for defaults occurring prior thereto. SIGNED; SEALED, AND DATED this 25th day of September, „ 2006. J.K. S ANLAN COMPANY INC.' P hcipal By: (sea!) John K. Scanlan, President WESTE SURETY C PANY Surety By: (Seal) Richard A Le ro4 Attorney-in-Fact G•23172-8 f J Western SuretyCompany POWER OF ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT Know All Men By These Presents,That WESTERN SURETY COMPANY,a South Dakota corporation,is a duly organized and existing corporation having its principal office in the City of Sioux Falls,and State of South Dakota,and that it does by virtue of the signature and seal herein affixed hereby make,constitute and appoint Richard,A Leveroni, Kathleen M Flanagan,,Individually of East Hartford,CT,its true and lawful Attomey(s}in-Fact with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign,seal and execute for and on its behalf bonds,underta kings and other obligatory insttumentsof similarnature -In Unlimited Amounts - r and to bind it thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such instruments were signed by a duly authorized officer of the corporation and all the acts of said Attorney,pursuant to the authority hereby given,are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the By-Law printed on the reverse hereof,duly adopted,as indicated,by the shareholders of the corporation. In Witness Whereof,WESTERN SURETY COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Senior Vice President and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed on this 20th day of July,2004. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY .oSVREry""4� €„Q'4Q,PDA4r�s pis, fAV.r; ti�w4'N Dpµo�� Paul 75ruflat,Senior Vice President State of South Dakota 1 I ss County of Minnehaha On this 20th day of July,2004,before me personally came Paul T.Bru'flat,to me known,who,being by me duly swom,did depose and say: that he resides in the City of Sioux Falls,State of South Dakota;that he is the Senior Vice President of WESTERN SURETY COMPANY described in and which executed the above instrument;that he knows the seal of said corporation;that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal;that it was so affixed pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto pursuant to like authority,and acknowledges same to be the act and deed of said corporation. My commission expires #��StiSti45SSy5.,yyyS.,yyc y.,e,,,f s D. KRELL f 1 November 30,2006 s NOTARY PUBLIC s i SEAL SOUTH DAKOTA SEAS i s 45S�,a55hy55y�,54�,5tih5y55a D.Krell,No ry Public CERTIFICATE 1, L.Nelson,Assistant Secretary of WESTERN SURETY COMPANY do hereby certify that the Power of Attorney hereinabove set forth is still in force,and further certify that the By-Law of the corporation printed on the reverse hereof is still in force. In testimony whereof 1 have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the said corporation this 25th da of September 2006 Y s o" WESTERN SURETY COMPANY ���o a y� ` Fonn F4280-01-02 L.Nelson,Assistant Secretary t. ' n Authorizing By-Law ADOPTED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS OF WESTERN SURETY COMPANY This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of-the following By-Law duly adopted by the shareholders' of the Company. Section 7. All bonds, policies, undertakings, Powers of Attorney, or other obligations of the corporation shall be executed in the corporate name of the Company by the President, Secretary, and Assistant Secretary, Treasurer, or any Vice President, or by such other officers as the Board of Directors may authorize. The President,any Vice President, Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, or the Treasurer may appoint Attorneys,in Fact or agents who shall hav-- authrrity to issue bonds,policies, or undertakings in the'name of the Company. The corporate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds, policies, undertakings, Powers of Attorney or other obligations of the corporation. The signature of any such officer and the corporate seal may be printed by facsimile. n, •e f Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services BARNSTABLE, 9 MASS. g Thomas F.Geiler,Director i639• ♦0 Building Division Tom Perry, Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 Property Owner Must Complete and Sign This Section If Using A Builder I, L,AoJ SS�,(Vi �'�-�� , as Owner of the subject property hereby authorize SG(aGV L to act on my behalf, in all matters relative to work authorized by this building permit application for: (Address of Job) /* Signature;Odwner Date Print Name Q:FORM&OWNERPERMISSION � f Town of Barnstable EMWMEIM Zoning Board of Appeals Gail Nightingale,Chairman 200 Main Street,Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 Phone(508)862-4785 Fax(508)862-4725 Growth Management Department 367 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 Ruth J.Weil,Director January 11, 2007 Thomas Perry— Building Commissioner Regulatory Services — Building Division 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 RE: Tradewinds Inn — Revised Plans Dear Mr. Perry, At the January 3, 2007 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Board reviewed and discussed revised plans for the redevelopment of the Tradewinds submitted to your Division for a Building Permit in accordance with Special Permit No. 2005-65 issued September 27, 2005. The review was triggered to determine if those plans submitted pose a significant change from plans approved by the Board in the issuance of the Permit that would warrant a public hearing and modification of the Special Permit. Attorney Michael D. Ford and Architect A. Arbenz Kenny were present to discuss the changes. Upon review concerns were expressed for the increase in the height of Building A. It was noted that the height was consistent with the other buildings as originally approved in the Permit. It was also noted that the overall gross area of the buildings were not increased although added living area will be gained in Building E by moving of three indoor parking garages from that building to neighboring buildings. After discussion, a motion was duly made and seconded that the revised plans for the Tradewinds redevelopment that have been submitted to the Building Division for a Build Permit do not constitute a change in the plans requiring a public hearing by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Board Members; Daniel M. Creedon, Randolph Childs,James R. Hatfield, and Gail C. Nightingale voted to affirm the motion. Board Member Ron S. Jansson voted nay. The motion, having four affirmative votes, carries and the revised plans for the redevelopment of the Tradewinds entitled "The Residences at Trade Winds 780 Craigville Beach Road West Hyannisport, Massachusetts" dated July 11, 2006, the Architects for which are Keenan & Kenny Architects, LTD have been determined to be permitable under Special Permit.No. 2005-65 as issued and without the need for a modification of the Permit. Respectfully: failghtingale, Chai man Copy: Michael D. Ford, P.O. Box 665,West Harwich,MA 02671 A.Arbenz Kenny, Keenan & Kenny Architects, LTD., 189 Main St.Suite 2a, Falmouth MA,02540 Alan Isenstadt,Trustee of the Archer Realty Trust, P.O. Box 477 Centreville,MA 02632 Ruth Weil— Director—Growth Management Department Thomas A. Broa&ck—Director Regulatory Review-Growth Management Department ZBA File#2005-065 l.� TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Map Parcel Ald 00/ Application# cW076aa�� Health Division Conservation Division 3 s Permit# Tax Collector Date Issued ` )ion Treasurer Application Fee Planning Dept. Permit Fee Date Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board ro-R Historic-OKH Preservation/Hyannis Project Street Address 760 A Craigville Beach Road Village Centerville Owner Orbis Properties Address 1 State Street, 14th Floor Boston, MA Telephone Permit Request Complete demolition & disposal of existing building Square feet: 1 st floor:existing 1000 proposed 2nd floor:existing 750 proposed Total new Zoning District RB Flood Plain Groundwater Overlay Project Valuation ! A00 Construction Type Lot Size Grandfathered: ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, attach supporting documentation. Dwelling Type: Single Family ❑ Two Family ❑ Multi-Family(#units) Age of Existing Structure Historic House: ❑Yes M No - On Old King's Highway: ❑Yes ❑No Basement Type: ❑ Full ❑Crawl ❑Walkout ❑Other Basement Finished Area(sq.ft.) Basement Unfinished Area(sq.ft) Number of Baths: Full:existing new Half:existing new Number of Bedrooms: existing new Total Room Count(not including baths):existing new First Floor Room Count Heat Type and Fuel: ❑Gas ❑Oil ❑ Electric ❑Other Central Air: ❑Yes ❑No Fireplaces: Existing New Existing wood/coal stove: ❑Yes ❑No Detached garage:❑existing ❑new size Pool:❑existing ❑new size Barn:❑existing ❑new size Attached garage:❑existing ❑new size Shed:❑existing ❑new size Other: Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization ❑ Appeal# Recorded❑_ f '� Commercial ❑Yes ❑No If yes, site plan review# Current Use Proposed Use I co BUILDER INFORMATION o m w Name John Scanlan Telephone Number 508-540-62 6 Address 15 Research Road License# CS O40692 East Falmouth, YAA 02536 Home Improvement Contractor# Worker's Compensation# WC1-111-258096-036 ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO Bourne Landfill SIGNATURE DATE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PERMIT NO. DATE ISSUED MAP/PARCEL NO. ADDRESS VILLAGE OWNER y. 4 DATE OF INSPECTION: FOUNDATION FRAME INSULATION FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL: ROUGH FINAL PLUMBING: ROUGH FINAL GAS: ROUGH FINAL FINAL BUILDING w DATE CLOSED OUT ` ASSOCIATION PLAN NO. i_ t he t,•ontmonwealth t?,t massacnuseres Department of Industrial Accidents Office of Investigations d 600 Washington Street Boston,MA 02111 ` www.mass.gov/dia ' workers' Compensation Insurance Affidavit:-Builders/Contractors/E.lectricians/Plil-mbers Applicant Information Please Print Legibly Name (Business/Organization/Individual): J.R- Scanlan Company,, Inc. ca Address: .15 Research Read, City/State/Zip: E.. Falmouth, MA 02536 Phone:#: 508-540-6226 Are you an employer? Check the'appropriate boa: -Type of project(requited):. 1.❑ I am a em to er with 4. ® I am a general contractor and I P Y 6.• ®New construction . employees (full and/or part-time).* have hired the stab-contractors 2. I am a'sole proprietor or partner- listed on the-aitached sheet. 7. ❑Remodeling ship andhave no employees These sub-contractors have 8• ®Demolition workingfor me in an capacity. employees and have workers' Y P tY 9. ❑Building addition [No workers' comp.insurance comp,insurance. • required.] 5. 7 We are a corporation and its 10.❑Electrical repairs or additions 3.❑ I am a homeowner doing.all work officers have exercised their l l.❑Plumbing repairs or additions myself. [No workers' comp. right of exemption per MGL 12.Q Roof repairs insurance required.]t c. 152 § ( �, 1 4 ,and we have no 13.7 Other employees. [No workers' comp.insurance required.] *Any applicant that checks box#1 must also fill out the section below showing their workers'compensation policy information. t Homeowners who submit this affidavit indicating they are doing all work and then hire outside contractors must submit anew affidavit indicating such. #Contractors that check this box must attached an additional sheet showing the name of the'sub-contractors and state whether or not those entities have employees: If the sub-contractors have employees,they must provide their workers'comp.policynumber. lam an employer that is providing workers'compensation insurance for my employees- Below is.the polity and job site information. Insurance Company Name: Liberty Mutual ' Policy#•or Seli ins. Lic.#: WCI-11.1-258096-036 Expiration Date: 8/31/07 lob Site Address: 780.Craigville Beach Road - City/State/Zip: Centerville, MA 02632 Attach a copy of the workers' compensation policy declaration page'(showing the policy number and expiration date). Failure.to secure coverage as required under Section 254 of MGL c. 152 can lead to the imposition of criminal penalties of a fine up to S 1,500.00 and/or one-year imprisonment, as well as civil penalties in the form of a STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of up to $250.00 a day against the violator, Be advised that a copy of this statement may be forwarded to the Off ce of Investigations of the DIA for insurance coverage verification. I'do hereby certify unde epains penalties ofperjury that the information provided above is true and.correct, Date: May 1, .2007 Greg Inon, Project Manager Phone#: 508-540-6226 - Offlcial use only.. Do not write in this area, to be completed by city or town officiaL City or Town: Perudt/License# Issuing Authority(circle one)—Board of Health 2.Building.Department 3. City/Town Clerk 4.Electrical Inspector 5,Plumbing Inspector 6. Other Contact Person: Phone 9: Information and Instructi®us Massachusetts General Laws chapter 152 requires all employers to provide workers'compensation for their employees. Pursuant to this statute,an employee is defined as"...every person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written." An employer is defined as"an individual,partnership,association,corporation or other legal entity,or any two or more of the foregoing engaged in a joint enterprise, and including the legal representatives of a•deceased employer,or the =ece e�attnustee-of an individual,partnership, association or other legal entity, employing employees. However the owner of a dwellfug-house having not more than three apartments and who resides therein;or the occupant of the dwelling house of another who employs persons to do maintenance,construction or repair work on such dwelling-house or on the grounds or building appurtenant thereto shall not because of such employment be deemed to be an employer." MGL chapter 152, §25C(6)also states that"every state or local licensing agency shall withhold the issuance or, rene al of a license or permit to'o erate a business or to construct buildings in the commonwealth for any . w P P g applicant-who has not produced�acceptable evidence of compliance with the insurance coverage required. Additionally,MGL chapter 152, §25C(7)states"Neither the commonwealth nor any of its political subdivisions shall enter into any contract for the performance of public work until•acceptable evidence of compliance with the in-st=- arce requirements of this chapter have been presented#o the contracting authority." Applicants Please fill out the workers'compensation affidavit completely,by checking the boxes that apply to your situation and, if necessary,supply sub-contiactor(s)name(s), address(a)and phone number(s)along with their certificate(s)of insurance. Limited Liability Companies•(LLC)or Limited Liability Partnerships(LLP)with no employees other.than the members orpartners, are not required to carry workers' compensation insurance. If an LLC or LLP does have employees,a policy is required. Be advised that this affidavit may be submitted to the Department of Industrial Accidents for confirmation of insurance coverage. Also be sure to sign and date the affidavit. The affidavit should be returned to the city or town that the application for the permit.or.license is being requested,not the Department of Industrial Accidents,, Should you have any questions regarding the law.or'-if you are required to obtain a workers.'- compensation policy,please call the Department at the number listed below. Self-insured companies should enter their self-insurance license number on the appropriate-line. City or Town Officials Please.be sure that the affidavit is complete'and printed legibly. The Department has provided a space at the bottom of the affidavit for you to fill out in the event the Office of Investigations has to contact you regarding the applicant. Please be sure to fill in the permit/license number which will be used as a reference number. In addition, an applicant that must submit multiple permit/license applications in any given year,need only submit one affidavit indicating current policy'information(if necessary)and under"Job Site Address"the applicant should write"all-locations in (city-or town)."A copy of the affidavit that has.been officially stamped or marked by the city or town may be provided to the applicant as proof that a valid affidavit is on file for future permits or licenses. A new affidavit must be filled out each year.Where a home owner or citizen is obtaining a license or permit not related to any business or commercial venture (i.e. a dog license or permit to bum leaves-etc.) said persoa is NOT required to complete this affidavit. The Office of Investigations would hike to thank you in advance for your cooperation and should you have any questions. please do not hesitate to give us a can. The Depaxtment's address,telephone-and fax number: Jb�,CommoiiweaJ.th of Massadhus�tts Departmi nt of ladutial M-60c nts Office of Ina-yestigat ons • ��4�asshi�gt� �trse� Boston, MA 02111 TeL#617-727-0W.ext 406 ar 1�07 - 4 SAF8 Revised 11-22 06 Fax# 617-727-7749° www.Mass.govidia r Client#:89155 CCCONSTRUCTION ACORDTM CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 0DATE(MM/D 4/09/4/09/0 7D/YYYY) PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Feitelberg Company LLC ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 222 Milliken Blvd HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. PO Box 3220 Fall River,MA 02722-3220 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED INSURER A: Acadia Insurance Companies C.C.Construction,Inc.15 Diamond's Path INSURER B: Construction Industries Compensation South Dennis,MA 02660 INSURER C: INSURER D: - INSURER E: - COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. - LTR INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATIONDATE MM/DD/YY DATE MMIDDIYY LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY CPA130124915 06/15/06 06/15/07 EACH OCCURRENCE $1 OOO 000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY - - - - DAMAGE ES TO RENTE occur ante) $250 000 PREMCLAIMS MADE FE OCCUR - - MED EXP(Any one person) $5 000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $1 OOO OOO- GENERAL AGGREGATE s2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: _ _ _ PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $2 000,000 POLICY X PRO- JECT X LOC A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY MAA130125015 06/15/06 - 06/15/07 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT ANY AUTO (Ea accident) $1,000,000, X ALL OWNED AUTOS - - -BODILY INJURY _ $ X SCHEDULED AUTOS - (Per person) X HIRED AUTOS - . BODILY INJURY $ X NON-OWNED AUTOS - (Per accident) X Drive Other Car PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY - AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO - OTHER THAN EA ACC $ - - - - AUTO ONLY: AGG $ A .EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY CUA011963312 06/15/06 06/15/07 - EACH OCCURRENCE s7,000.000 X OCCUR CLAIMS MADE - - AGGREGATE s7,000,000 DEDUCTIBLE - - $ - RETENTION $ B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND W00005737. - 01/01/07 01/01/08 X TWOC Y STL IMIT ERA IT 0ER EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY - ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE - - E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $500,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? - - - E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE s500,000 If yes,describe under. - - SPECIAL PROVISIONS below - E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $500,000- OTHER - DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS I VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS - - - - - - RE:Job#0616 The Residences at Trade Winds,780 Craigville Beach Road, .Centerville, MA J.K.Scanlan Company,Inc.and Trade Winds Residences LLC are named as additional insured with respect to general liability,automobile liability (See Attached Descriptions) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION- J.K.Scanlan Company,Inc. DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 'An DAYS WRITTEN Falmouth Technology Park NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL 15 Research Road IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR East Falmouth,MA 02536 REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25(2001/08)1 of 3 #S113812/M104163 DP3 © ACORD CORPORATION 1988 I i ✓fie �omainearuvea�i o�,�ac�ivaeG_Y� BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS License: CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR r Numbed:CS, 040692 Expires 09/06/2008 Tr.no: 1428.0 R*rlctect 0:0 JOHN K SCANW 15 FERNWOOD Rat c NO FALMOUTH, MA 0556%'' Commissioner i 00-35,000 cf enclosed space (MGL C.112 S.60L) y i to-Masonry only I-1&2 Family Homes i Failure to possess a current edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code is cause for revocation of this license. i i ! DIG SAFE CALL CENTER: (888)344-7233 This certificate is executed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Group as respects such insurance as is afforded by those companies. BM0068 Certificate of Insurance F-X,ded certificate is issued as a matter ofinformation only and confers no rights upon you the certificate holder. This certificate is not an insurance policy and does not amend,extend,oralter the coverage by the policies listed below. This is to certify that(Name and address of Insured) J.K.Scanlan Company,Inc. _�� , 15 Research Road -. j■ i East Falmouth,MA 025364440 m `—il T� is,at the issue date of this certificate,insured by the Company under the policy(ies)listed below. The insurance afforded by the listed policy(ies)is subject to all their terms,exclusions and conditions and is not altered by any requirement,term or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued. Ex iration Type Eff./Ex .Date(s) Policy Number(s) Limits of Liability Continuous* 08/31/2006/08/31/2007 WC1-111-258096-036 Coverage afforded under WC law of Employers Liability Extended the following states: Bodily Injury By Accident X Policy Term CA,MA,NH,OK,VA $1,000,000 Each Accident Bodily Injury By Disease $1,000,000 Policy Limit Workers Compensation Bodily Injury By Disease $1,000,000 Each Person 08/31/2006/08/31/2007 YY2-1 1 1-258096-01 6 General Aggregate-Other than Prod/Completed Operations General Liability $2,000,000* Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Claims Made $2,000,000* X Occurrence Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability Per $1,000,000 Occurrence Retro Date Personal and Advertising Injury Per Person/ $1,000,000 Organization Other Liability Other Liability Med.Pay$10,000 Fire Legal$300,000 08/31/2006/08/31/2007 AS2-111-258096-066 Each Accident-Single Limit-B.I.and P.D.Combined Automobile Liability $1,000,000 Each Person X Owned X Non-Owned Each Accident or Occurrence X Hired Each Accident or Occurrence C *Per project and per location combined aggregate limit of$2,000,000 with cap of$10,000,000. O Employee liability limits for CA are:1,000,000/1,000,000/1,000,000.--Job Number:0616Project Name:Residences at Trade Winds-780 Craigville Beach Road, M Centerville,MA 02632Additional Insured:Trade Winds Residences,LLC. M E N T S *If the certificate expiration date is continuous or extended term,you will be notified if coverage is terminated or reduced before the certificate expiration date. However,you will not be notified annually of the continuation of coverage. Special Notice-Ohio:Any person who,with intent to defraud or knowing that he/she is facilitating a fraud against an insurer,submits an application or files a claim containing a false or deceptive statement is guilty of insurance fraud. Important information to Florida policyholders and certificate holders:in the event you have any questions or need information about this certificate for any reason,please contact your local sales producer, whose name and telephone number appears in the lower left comer of this certificate. The appropriate local sales office mailing address may also be obtained by calling this number. Notice of cancellation: (not applicable unless a number.of days is entered below).Before the stated expiration date the company will not cancel or reduce the insurance afforded under the above policies until at least 30 days notice of such cancellation has been mailed to: Office: WESTON,MA-SOUTH Phone: 781-891-8900 Certificate Holder: CLARE HALLAHAN James Walsh Authorized Representative Trade Winds Residences, LLC One State Street, 14th .Floor Boston, MA 02109 Date Issued: 03/21/2007 Prepared By: KS �WN M05/'02/2007 12:20 6172636874 PAGE 01i 01 ■one Town of Barnstable. A • Regulatory = �►�ltvaaestt Services- MAM Thomas F:Grder,.Dfredor r A Build iug.DiAsiou. Tom Perry; 11-WI&a9 Commissioner 20O�Yiain 5tne� Hyannis,MA 02601 '�►�v.to�vn.6 arnstable.ma.us Q�ce:; .SqB`-&6��4038 Fax: 50.8-790-6230 'Property Owner Must Complete and Sign Tbis .S:ection. If Using A.Bui.lder lliiqw lW S c �e-7; cx- C_ I; ✓ 3 �/A �( /G ,as Otivner of die stiibject property ierebyautL o ze J��� se•�c•Ia to-vi#on.sny beh%H,. ia.all matters relative W,VO authorized bytbis bi nding permit application;for: W&W S of job) _ /- 0 S" of Owner Date I'riht Iw� • Q?ORMs•:OWN..I�YER�,�1IS5'fON ' . y` OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte.6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 • Hyannis 508-778-9600 ■ Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #21 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C 16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: September 10., 2007,at,9:30AM Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, Overcast, 66°Ff Present at Site: Chad B. Hill, Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) o tM Richard Scanlan,J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. (JKS) A field inspection was at.the request of Richard Scanlan(JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for the retaining wall at buildin (A B). Also,building"A"footings at the southwest side are to be inspected as well. 1. It was observed that the forms and rebar placed for the retaining wall sections at building,"A-B"were non--` conforming with CEC plans. - k- • All continuous horizontal rebar appeared to be#5 bars spaced 12"O.C. as specified. • All vertical rebar appeared to be#5 bars spaced 16"O.C. and is non-conforming to CEC plans, as 12" O.C.bars are specified. • 2"Dia. PVC weeps appeared to be installed for drainage as specified. • All rebar doweled into existing concrete walls appeared to be set using the specified epoxy. - • All hooked footing dowels.appeared to be 12".O.C..and lap with the vertical rebar spaced at 16"O.C. e'This is non-conforming with CEC plans. • Only one row of rebar exists within the wall form and CEC specifies two. This is non-conforming with CEC plans.. • The one row of rebar.that exists within the wall is placed approximately 4"to 6" from the inside of the wall form(high side). CEC specifies 2"clear. This is non-conforming with CEC plans. • It appears that the rebar is doweled 12"O.C. into building"A"and`B"and consistent with a 24" lap at all corner bars. Horizontal rebar runs straight into building"A"and is lapped 20"with existing r building"B"dowels. All non-conforming items were noted to J.K.-Scanlan so that revisions could be made. 2. It was observed that the footings for building"A"(southwest side)were in accordance with CEC plans. • All footing form and rebar geometry appeared to be sized and placed in accordance with CEC plans. • Footing dowels appeared to be#5 bars spaced at 16" O.C.with the specified hook size as on CEC plan. ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ f Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 September 10,2007. Field Inspection Report#21 • Transverse rebar in footing appeared to be#4 bars equally spaced as specified. • Longitudinal rebar appeared to be 344 bars, 3"clear as specified. • All forms appeared to be placed on the existing sand based soil, which appeared to be compacted. 0 All footings appeared to be 12" thick and 2'-6"wide as specified. • The stepped footing at the existing.wall of building"A"appears to maintain a 2:1 ratio and is in accordance with CEC plan. • All rebar doweled into existing concrete footings appeared to be set using the specified epoxy. • All rebar at column locations appeared to be in accordance with CEC plans. Submitted by: Chad B.Hill Date Structural Engineering Technician- CBH%dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart David A.Morand,P.E., SECB (CEC) D:IDOCIC16600116684116684.OIIInspectionsIField Inspection Report 21.doc OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte.6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 January 11,2008 Project No.C16684.01 Town of Barnstable Building Division 200 Main Street Hyannis,MA 02601 Advance Conv Via.Fax: 508-790-6230 Re: Trade Winds Residences Building"A",Units 5,6,7,and 8 Framing Approval ` 780 Craigville Beach Road,Barnstable,MA Dear Barnstable Building Division: Coastal Engineering Company,Inc. (CEC)has performed-the Building_'W'Framing Punchlist for Units; 5i 6;.7,and 8 as indicated upon our Structural Field Inspection Reports No. 37 through 39. CEC has performed a follow up field inspection on Tuesday,January 08,2008 (Structural Field Inspection Report No. 40)to verify that the outstanding punch-list items have been resolved per our initial field visit observations. As such,we hereby approve the final wood and structural steel framing construction associated with Building"A", for Units 5;'6';"7;and 8 at the Trade Winds Condominiums project. Please note that this letter represents the framing approval only,and is not intended to serve as the final structural affidavit sign-off of the project to obtain occupancy. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require any additional information regarding this matter. Very truly yours, COASTAL ENGINEERING CO.,INC. David A.Morand,P.E., SECB Structural Division Manager m DAM/dlb c_ r y; Enclosure _ cc: David Robbins(via fax: 508-790-0329) Xl� % John Stewart •- • ! •< , c:: a ti.,.?6:1 t- +,.�`,T t,...r,7 ..� . .:;.�i .�' . . .) •+.., t. ..... 1 .. „1S' . 7c r"'l r t r :C>; r: f t... I Fd':. f' r i U:IDO('IC16600116684116684011Corresp6liilence'!LetterBldgDept 0/1.108.rloc ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte.6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 ■ Provincetown 508-487-9600 ■ Hyannis 508-778-9600 0 Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT#39 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location:`780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: Wednesday,Jan. 02, 2008, at 2:00 PM Barnstable,MA Weather: Cold, cloudy, 30'Ff Present at Site: David Robbins J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co., Inc. (CEC) David Morand-CEC .n, A field inspection was-.made to review the dormer roof areas in units 5-8 in Building"A",the following was observed � 1. The cathedratroof areas in Units,7,and 8;were observed-.;As previously stated in Inspection Report#38;the... roof was not constructed in accordance with CEC structural drawings. As such,based.on the field observation the following fixes are to be implemented: a. Provide a new 1 3/4"x 5 1/4"LVL collar tie on the opposing face of the existing collar ties at every_ other"rafter. b. Attach the new LVL collar tie to the rafter with Sika Dur Anchor Fix 3. Provide 5- 1/4"diameter x 4 1/2" long Simpson SDS screws on each side of the new collar tie. c. At the interior end of the ridge beam provide a 3 1/2"x 3 1/2"LVL column (minimum) from the nders�_,A-of the rM k�-- to t e header,be_nt Ateach.flp r��r rrostothe rij4brt� w^-- d JCader,v. h Simpson PC series post caps. 2. The arched roof and associated roof system was observed in Units 5 and 6.Due to the roof rafters attaching to a ledger,which is attached to the adjacent roof trusses with 3 nails,the following fix needs to be provided to ensure proper load path and roof connections. a. Infill between the existing roof trusses at the dormer location with a:2"x 4" stud wall from the existing header to the bottom of the existing ledger.that supports the dormer roof. b. -Provide.a (2)-2"x10"header on:top of the new wall infill.Place a-2'-0" long x.2.'-0"wide_x 1/2"APA .-.rated,plywood the-to the backside.of the,studs,Attach th&plywood with Sika Anchor.Fix-1or,.4an_ d with 16d nails at 3"o.c. at the.edges and 6"o.c. in the field. -Attach the ledger to the new(2)-2"x10"header with(2)-1/4"diameter x 4 1/2"long Simpson SDS s t Jscrews:atl8', d Attach the infill wall to the truss with 1/4" diameter x 4 1/2"Tong Simpson SDS screws"at 16" o.c,. staggered. ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 January 2,2008 e. In one portion of the new infill wall is located a vent duct,the infill wall is to be headed off around the vent. f. Place new joist hangers at rafters that are missing hangers at the ledger location. 3. Per discussion with David Robbins, a.tentative inspection date of 1/4/07 in the morning has been established to verify that these fixes are properly completed. Submitted by: Jon Downing, . . JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart ;f D:IDOCIC]66001166841166840IIInspectionslField Inspection Report 39.rloc cc 2009 JAN 14 PPS 12' 02 DIVISION a , } i I ` OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 c STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #40 To: Barnstable Building Department (� Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.0I Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: Tuesday, Jan. 08,2008, at 7:30 AM Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, cloudy, 50'Ft Present at Site: David Robbins-J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) A field inspection was made to review the completed construction for the reinforced dormer roof areas in Units 5-8 in Building"A'; the following was observed: 1. The cathedral roof in Unit 7 and 8 was observed to have the following reinforcing: a. New 1 3/4 x 5 1/2"LVL collar ties on the opposing face of the existing collar ties at every other rafter(3 total)were placed. The end three rafters on the interior of the building had no supplemental collar ties.This is acceptable, as this end of the roof is less likely to spread due to the new post support that has been installed continuous to the header below. b. The new LVL collar tie appeared to be attached to the rafter with an epoxy adhesive and five(5)-SDS screws on each side of the new collar tie as specified. c. At the interior end of the ridge beam, a 4"x 6"post from the underside of the ridge am to ft header below was provided.The post is attached to the ridge beam and header with Simp'so PC ser poscaps. 2. The arched roof and associated roof system was observed in Units 5 and 6.The followin reinforcing was provided: � 7, a. A 2"x4" infill stud wall was placed between the existing roof trusses at the dormer ld�ation eg-�ndirg from the existing header to the bottom of the existing ledger that supports the dormer roof's specified. R b. It was observed that the specified(2)-2"x10"header on top of the new wall infill w s� nstalled directly in back of the existing ledger. The new(2)72"x10"header was attached to,the stud wall ith a pieoe off'-0" long x 1/2"OSB on the backside of the studs. The OSB was attached to the studs with ails spaeed aK j _- approximately 3"o.c. at the edges and 6"o.c. in the field, as specified. c. The ledger was attached to the new(2)-2"x10"header with 3 to 4 Simpson SDS screw d. The infill stud wall was attached to the trusses with 2 nails next to each other spaced approximately 16"o.c. e. At the location where the infill stud wall has a vent, there.is a(2)-2"x10"header above the vent. 3. The location of the posts to support the roof;above the back deck on Unit"2"was discussed. The architectural plans do not match the structural plans for the post location.Upon follow-up back at the office, it appears that Dave Robbins did not have the latest architectural drawings. ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ �.• "•Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 January 8,2008 4. It was observed that at the front porch area of Unit 8,there was a new patch in the concrete foundation wall. 5. It was noted that the back deck.for Building"A"was being built. CEC observed that the post base connector, which was previously noted to have been bent,has been unbent and the deck post attached.The connector appears to be in good condition. 6. It was observed that several of the wall panels on the back side of Building"A"at Units 2-5 had pieces of the exterior sheathing ripped off of the studs. It is not clear why this occurred.. Submitted by: Jon Downing,E.I.T. JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart D:DOCIC16600116684116684011InspectionslField Inspection Report 40.doc OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 ■ Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #41 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: Thursday,Jan. 11, 2008,at 11:15 AM Barnstable,MA Weather: cold, cloudy, 30'Ft Present at Site: _ Mel-J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) Steve- Shawnlee Construction Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) A field inspection was made per the request of Mel of J.K. Scanlan to inspect the exterior sheathing nailing for the balance of building"A"(Units 1-4);the following was observed: 1. Several nails were pulled from the sheathing to determine the size nail that was used. It was found that 3 of the nails pulled appeared to be IOd nails(3" long)as specified.However, it was found that the fourth nail that was pulled appeared to be 8d(2 'h"long). Steve of Shawnlee was informed of this. �/ 2. It was observed that the nails were placed on average at 3"to 4" o.c. at the panel edge and 6"o.c. in the field. 3. The outside corners were'observed to be nailed on both sides at 3"o.c. spacing. 4. The exterior sheathing above the majority of the doors and windows was nailed at 3"o.c. at the perimeter.However, there was no nailing present in the field of the panels. These panels above the doors and windows were approximately 2'-0"tall, and should have 3 rows of nails in the field. Steve from Shawnlee was informed that this needs to be corrected. 5. In Unit 4,one of the front wall panels had nails at'an angle protruding from the edge of the stud.There only appeared to be one row of nails in the panel at this location.As such,the panel edge needs to be re-nailed so that the nails fully penetrate the stud. Steve of Shawnlee was informed that this needs to be corrected. Submitted by: , Jon Downing,E.I.T. sf s'3 JMD/dlbcu _ cc: ' JX- Scanlan'Co:, Inc: r . •.r ry, .i i.,. Keeiiari&'Kenny'Arcliitect"st r ► '`, `. < � . ,�:i ;�. 51 t::i.;.I:�. .....• �I x<;f,>. .�}l :t....'.„.y} r �. James'VJalsh • � _ �J6hn Stewart'j'F \ .• U �' :' ....' t_.,„i,t ...... %)jU... €ii:�i C ;i: . st �6s.��6 :.r, .:« :., :� ° ti: �: :s � it �• .. 'f � r: .r..,,-C,. ,.+;: �,, _T < r t,..t'r1 - aa::' r,, Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ r h OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 . Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL*FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #42' To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: Tuesday,Jan. 22,2008,at 10:15 AM Bariisiable;iry IA Weath`.: cold; cloudy, �'10'F+ Present at Site: Mel-J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) Steve-Shawnlee Construction Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc:(CEC) A field inspection was made per the request of Mel of J.K. Scanlan to re-inspect the exterior sheathing nailing for the balance of building"A"(Units 1-4);the following was observed: 1. The nails were placed on average 3"to 4"o.c. at the panel edge and 6"o.c. in the panel field. 2. Several of the outside panel corners were reviewed and found to have been nailed on both sides at 3"o.c. spacing. 3. The exterior sheathing above the two(2)of the wall openings at the back of building"A"was nailed at 3"o.c. at the perimeter.,However,there was no nailing present in the field of the panels,as previously pointed out by CEC. Steve of Shawnlee""was informed and these panels were nailed properly prior to leaving the site. The other panels over the, doors and windows that needed nailing in the field were observed to have been done with nail spacing averaging approximately 4"6.c. 4. In Unit 4,at the front wall panel that had nails at an angle protruding from the edge of the stud had nails added,with a spacing of 1'/z"o.c. Submitted by: Ion Downing,E.I.T. JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects .. Fa..(.. . .+ ar ..._ .:r ti Q '.f. �1�1 is -3,r_:. -. •. s .x �. .i:J °.` James Walsh � t Joh +r n Stewart r .�:1.' G�. ( :.:A. 7 i:,eyE •i'a i v ; r i r t..;;_...+.r.--""p"p" y y.�_.51+ �t( 4. z 3 . `i ... : Nrti i•� �'{.. .... �.,j_f';'u�,:•+.i.1b t . . Re'ic 7 ,.;�i; ..l.' ,:i,•r ._., y; -1 c-v't: ,,.ft _ sl;. : '-r � ,:t.cr��if`,.?t�'�; - • J..,+,.�,,p„ ` l r t.�I ,1. h ■Providing solutions for-the benefit of our clients,and community I OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #11 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road mate%Ti-,ne: July 16,2007 al,2:3U Ply Barnstable,MA Weather: Hot, Sunny, 83°Ff Present at Site: Chad Hill, Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) David Robbins,J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of David Robins(JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for the crawl space bump-but'footings`on,the''southwest'corners of Building."A A1's6,..thee walls southeast,northeast, and north of Building`=`A'--wer`e:inspected as=well�as th'e`slab`preparation:for-Building"_`B,'garage ,! .: 1. It was observed that-the'foriiisand rebar-placement for'the'footings'was iii'accordarice'with'CEC plans. • Footing dowels'`appeared'to.be#5 bars spaced at;16" o c'and'allow for at least 30" lap with the vertical bars.' " • Transverse bars appeared to be#4 bars at-16"'o:c.,which,is eloserthan specified and is acceptable. • Continuous longitudinal bars appeared to be 3-#4 with a minimum of 20" laps, equally spaced as specified. • Footings appeared to:be 12"thick as specified. 2. It was observed that the forms and rebar placed for the.bump=out sections at Building"A"was in accordance :v i.,t CEC tali;»tui itt� Vile% �IGrt'Gi the uVvv„i• tuC ;.ii itt at �iti lii [-u51 and i it.:tiiasv wall sections. The walls appeared to be 10" thick with the rebar approximately in the middle of the forms. • All vertical bars"appeared to be#5 bars spaced at 16" o.c. and have at least 30" lap with the footing dowels. • All walls appeared to be of the correct height: • All corner bars and locations of laps appeared to have.the specified'ininimum of.40 bar diameter lap; length. T • All horizontalibars appearedto be- ,#5 bars at 12" o c. as'spe'cified.' • The"dowels at.the•,sbi tlieast,`and northwest wall'sections (Vere:n6t'm-acc0_rddn&6*i-t$=CEC ,.1 ' specifications. Dowels appeared to be loose and the adhesive used was not cured T{jhe adhesive used wa's a S1ka''Ancho-'Fix l which rs not in'conformance witl A dUspec,i eie These wall sectlons,wer not poured acid dowel issues will be fixed'per;David Robbins (JKS)` ) flY M ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 July 24,2007 Field Inspection Report#11 3. Slab preparation at Building"B"was observed and was in accordance with CEC plans with the exception of the introduction of a compressible foam filler located at all walls and piers. • Transverse bars appeared to be#4 bars at 12" o.c., as specified., • Continuous longitudinal bars appeared to be 4 #4 bars equally spaced as specified. • Specified WWM appeared to be set with appropriate chairs and in accordance with CEC plans. -. • Specified.compacted structural fill and vapor barrier appeared to be in accordance with CEC plans. • It appeared that a compressible foam filler was used as a bond breaker,which is not specified on original documents nor on requested RFI responses. JKS stated that this material will be removed and an asphaltic bond breaker will be applied per David Robbins. Submitted by: Chad B. Hill Structural Engineering Technician CBH/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc: (Andrew Baker) Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart David A. Morand,P.E., SECB (CEC) , 7 ' D:I 0006600116684116684.01 UnspectionsTield Inspection Report 11.doc OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte.6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompdny.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #12 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: July 19,2007 at 3:30 PM Barnstable,MA Weather: Hot, Sunny,78°Ft Present at Site: Chad Hill,Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) David Robbins,J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc.(JKS) A field inspection was made to verify the existing sill attachment around the entire perimeter'of Building"A".It appears that the existing 3 1/2"x 3 1/2"wood sill is not attached and an attachment design detail will be proposed by CEC. 1. It was observed that the existing 3 1/2"x 3 1/2"wood sill rests unattached at north and south walls of Building "A". The wood sill lays along the inside of the 16"concrete wall with an inset that varies 0"to ''/z".It appears that the existing sill material is in good overall condition.There is also a 3/8"to 1/2"thick insulated pad which continues along the entire length of the underside of the sill.The 2 1/2"x 11 1/4"floor joists rest atop the sill 16" O.C.toenailed each side.Each floor joist extends flush with the sill resulting with 3 ''/2'of bearing support.`The east and west side returns of the foundation wall do not include sills and are open to daylight. CEC proposes a new attachment detail(SK-09)to be used at all existing sill locations.This detail includes a L4"x 3 1/2"x 1/4"steel angle with 5/8"Dia.x 4"long hot dipped galvanized lag bolts spaced 48"O.C.and 6"from each discontinued end. CEC recommends,using a non-shrink 5,000psi grout under angles if needed for full bearing support. , 2. It was also observed that there are two cracks in the existing concrete foundation wall at the southwesterly portion of Building"A".These cracks are approximately 1/16"to 1/8" inch in width and run the full height of the wall. CEC will reevaluate these cracks and determine what repair approaches(if any)will be required. Submitted by: r Chad B.Hill Date Structural Engineering Technician cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart David A.Morand,P.E., SECB(CEC) D.•IDOCIC16600116684116684 OIILnspecteonslField]nspection Report 12.doc ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community i J LWAOASTAL MOM NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. J - 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 ' _ www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 ■ Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #13 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: July 24, 2607 at 12:0G PM Barnstable,MA Weather: Hot, Sunny, 80°Ff Present at Site: Chad Hill, Coastal Engineering Co., Inc. (CEC) David Robbins, J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of David Robins (JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for the crawl space bump-out walls on the southwest corners of Building "A", and also the slab preparation for Building"C"garage. 1. It was observed that the forms and rebar placed for the bump-out sections at Building"A"was in accordance with CEC plans. The walls appeared to be 10" thick with the rebar approximately in the middle of the forms. • All vertical bars appeared to be#5 bars spaced at 16" o.c. and have at least 30" lap with the footing dowels. • All walls appeared to be of the correct height. • All corner bars.and locations of laps appeared to have the specified minimum of 40 bar diameter lap length. • A lI hor126nta1.bars,appea_red:.to be#5 bar&•at 12" d.c 'as.specified' • All dowel placements into existing concrete walls appeared to be in accordance with CEC plans. 2. Slab preparation at Building"C"was observed and was in accordance with CEC plans. • Transverse bars in strip footings appeared to be#4 bars at 12" o.c., as specified. • Continuous longitudinal bars in strip footings appeared to be 4-#4 bars equally spaced as specified. • Specified WWM appeared to be set with appropriate chairs and in accordance with CEC plans. ■Providing solutions for the benef t of our clients and community■ Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 August 8,2007 Field Inspection Report#13 • Specified compacted structural fill and vapor barrier appeared to be in accordance with CEC plans. • An asphaltic bond breaker was applied to the perimeter wall surfaces at proposed slab transition areas as specified. Submitted by: , Chad B. Hill Date Structural Engineering Technician CBH/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart David A. Morand,P.E., SECB (CEC) at D:IDOCICI6600116684I16684.011InspectionslField Inspection Report 13.d6c 0ASTAL _J - NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 ■ Provincetown 508-487-9600 ■ Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #14 To: - Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: July 30, 2007 at 3.15 PM Barnstable,MA Weather: Hot, Cloudy, 80°F± Present at Site: Chad Hill, Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) David Robbins, J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of David Robins(JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for the interior steel column footings and existing foundation wall infill located in Building"A". 1. It was observed that the forms and rebar placed for the interior footings at Building"A"was in accordance with CEC plans. • All footing form and rebar geometry appeared to be sized and placed correctly according to CEC plans with the exception of one located mid section of Building"A". This footing rests atop a large rock causing the form and rebar to teeter to one side. Scanlan was reminded of specified sub-base requirements for all foundations. • All rebar appeared to be#4 bars equally spaced as specified in CEC plans. • Most forms appeared to be placed on the,existing disturbed sand based soil. Sub-base soils did not-appear.to:be compacted,and showed:con_siderabte•foot�rint disturbanc.?„un.even: substrate, and no evidence of structural fill or crushed stone. CEC questioned David Robbins as to why specified sub-base conditions were not present. Drawing A-S5 Typical Column Base Detail specified"undisturbed acceptable soil",which is further specified on Sheet S-0 Foundation Notes. — • All footings appeared to be.12" thick as specified. • Plans indicate using a 1/4"Dia. Hilti-HY 150 adhesive anchor bolt. All steel anchor bolts placed are approximately 5/8"Dia. x 8" long with a 2"J-hook and are acceptable by CEC. 2. It was also observed that the rebar placed in the existing foundation wall infill locations was in accordance with CEC plans. • All rebar appeared to be#4 bars doweled in placed with specified epoxy 10-12"O.C.as shown on CEC plans. ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 August 8,2007 Field Inspection Report#14 1 All existing concrete wall sections appeared to be clean and free from any paint or debris. Surfaces also appeared to be prepared as roughened, as specified. Submitted by: Chad B. Hill Date Structural Engineering Technician CBH/dlb Attachment: Photos cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart David A.Morand, P.E., SECB (CEC) D:000C16600 16684116684.0111nspectionsWield Inspection Report 14.doc f r .. w a;. o r � . a � • �. ,1 T'��� 3 � ate. ,. tW PVT Ile AR .11 1) Note the disturbed sub-base soils below footing locations. r sa a7; G{� #'� .s✓r..�*e.,•�,2-x.-'o._, `t 2�..'��+2."•�`'.n1+-=2��."'3'f">. *'-r t a.{. s 2) Typical formed column footing. ;.' Note the disturbed sub-base soils, U with no evidence of compaction, structural fill, or crushed stone sub- base. w C16684.01 July 30, 2007 DAM/dlb 1 ruts OASTAL 7 NGINEERING - OMPANY; INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653. www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans�508-255-651 1 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #15 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: August 6, 2007, at 1:00 PM Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, Cloudy, 65°Ff Present at Site: Jon Downing, Coastal Engineering Co.,)Inc. (CEC) David Robbins, J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of David Robbins,(JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for footings for the exterior northeast corner of Building-"A". 1. It was observed that the forms and rebar placed for the footing at Building"A"was in accordance with CEC plans. • All footing form and rebar geometry appeared to be sized and placed correctly according to CEC plans. • Transverse rebar in footing appeared to be 344 bars equally spaced as specified. • Longitudinal rebar appeared to be#4 bars with at least the minimum lap length of 20". • All forms appeared to be placed on the existing sand based soil,which appeared to be compacted. • All footings appeared to be 12" thick as specified. • It was also.observed that the rebar placed in the existing footing locations was in accordance with,CEC plans. Rebar appeared to be#4 bars doweled in placed and epoxied to line up with the 3 equally spaced#4 bars. 2. The two east masonry walls in building`B"were observed to be in accordance to CEC plans. , • Bottom cores appeared to be grouted based on holes drilled in the first core, and by sound difference when hitting blocks with a hammer. • Bond beam at second floor level appeared to be grouted and horizontal wire reinforcement was observed between the bond beam and the CMU course above the bond beam. It was also observed that the end cells had double 45 bars as per CEC drawings. • When tested by hitting the CMU with a hammer, it appeared(via audible testing)that the cells,which should contain rebar,were grouted. • The west most wall in building`B"was being built*at the time of inspection. It was observed that the CMU had#5 rebar at the specified locations and horizontal reinforcement was being used_at each row. 7 ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ • ^ Trade-Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 August 8,2007 Field Inspection Report#1 S 3. It was noticed that the I"floor joist in building"B"had no blocking between joists, except for at support locations.When inquired, CEC was informed by Shawnlee,that.the blocking was not specified in the shop drawings,but was noticed on the structural drawings. Upon returning to the office, it was noted that blocking was called for on the approved shop drawings and construction documents. Submitted by: Qt9'1L �Crft�yl,G1La/ Jon Downing,EIT Date Project Engineer JMD/d1b cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart David A. Morand,P.E., SECB (CEC) 4 D:IDOCIC16600116684116684:OIIInspectionslField Inspection Report 15.doc r O.ziSTAI, NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.,CoastalFngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 M Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #25 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 T,,,atft n: .78n Crag -:tle Beach Road Dat_.M�,e. October 4, 2007 at 10:00 V.-4 L.,,u��.,... �.at i t. Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, Sunny, 75°Ff Present at Site: Jon Downing, Coastal Engineering Co:,Inc. (CEC) David Morand(CEC) Richard Scanlan J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. (JKS) Andrew Baker(JKS) Greg Inman (JKS) .Ray De vita;;(JKS) ; _ :LL <David Robbins'(JKS) John Keenan,Keenan and Kenny Architects (K&K) A field inspection was made of the request of J.K. Scanlan•to review current framing'issues;which have structural and architectural implications due to plumbing, electrical, and fire protection proposed construction. Previously directed structural modifications by K&K were review by CEC. The following was noted: 1. The rebar and forming of the Unit I Building"A"crawl space slab was observed(SK-5): a. The wire mesh appeared to be 6"x6"-W2.1xW2.1 WWM as specified. z ' b. WWM appeared to be lapped of all locations,-,by 1 mesh space plus 2 inches minimum as�specifie`& c. i ut cup tau apjjcatctt tU:u�z uutl[nc stone for the step 1}ttafLU i vCfii` d� specified._, d. Slab step appeared to be approximately l,foot as specified. 3 e. A continuous vapor retarder was observed throughout the pour area. All lap areas appeared to be C:> approximately 12" ; Mo 2. Placing of the concrete for the crawl'space slab in Building"A"was observed. ; a. Concrete was being placed without vibrators or rodding for this pour. ACI recommend that rodding and vibrating of the concrete is done to ensure full placement and consolidation of the con ete."'' Y _. ., b.. .There did not appear.to-be any-testing.present for-this-concrete.placement: -- c. David Robbins (JKS)was informed of the issues stated above. Pi 3. Rebar wa`slobserved a'second time for the Building"A deck piers(see Field Inspection Report 24). a. It was observed tfiat'4-#6 vertical dowels with 12"hooks were placed next to the 444 dowels. This is acceptable:' ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ r Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 3 October 4,2007 Field Inspection Report#25 b. All rebar had a minimum of 3"clear cover to the soil, and 2"clear cover from the forms as specified. 4. David Robbins of JKS was informed that the concrete for part of Building"D"had low compressive strength for the 28 day break. 5. Floor framing in Building"A"was discussed where the fireplace had originally been. It was concluded that the floor joists that span the width of the building on either side of the fireplace are to be removed and replaced by I joists. One of the joists will be replaced by a ledger that is attached to the CMU demising wall. CEC will provide sketch for the framing in this area. 6. In Building"A"Unit 7 there was no blocking or web stiffeners in the I joists at the bearing wall location as required in contract documents and approved shop drawings. Also in Unit 7 stiffeners were missing at mid height in all bearing walls. 7. In Unit 7,Building"A", it was noticed that LVL beams were secured to the ledger with Simpson HGLTV5.511 hangers. The hangers were secured to the ledger with.nails, as suggested by the manufacturer. 8. Per discussions with David Robbins,I joists are to receive holes drilled through the webs using the limitations that the manufacturer recommends. CEC informed JKS that this was an acceptable procedure. 9. In Unit 10,Building"B"it was noted that a load bearing wall had an approximate 2 ''/z"diameter hole through the studs. CEC informed JKS that these studs must have full size scab studs added to each drilled one, and to have the plumbing routed elsewhere. 4 10. In Unit 10 Building"B" it was noticed that one of the girder trusses had a_web member which completely cracked in half. JKS was informed of this and that it must be fixed. It was also noticed that no permanent bracing has been placed to stabilize the trusses.Dave Robbins informed CEC that the sub-contractor is waiting for a rainy day to place the bracing. 11. The plumber asked to drill a 2 9/16"hole in the LVL beam in the garages. The hole is to be 5"from the top of the beam and 6 ft. over from the nearest support location. CEC informed the plumber and JKS that this was acceptable, due to the fact that this LVL beam is actually part of a continuously supported band board. 12. Several roof trusses in Unit 10 Building"B"have Simpson HI hurricane ties which are missing top 2 nails. It is also noted that there is no nailing material present at the top two nailing holes.The truss manufacturer needs to provide written connection approval included with their stamped calculations showing the load capacity of the hanger in uplift with two missing nails. 13. In Unit 7 Building"A"a(4)-1 3/4"x 11 7/8"LVL beam was substituted for a steel beam. Based on our analysis,this beam is acceptable. The LVL beam rests on a 5 1/4"x 3 1/2"•LVL column; however, there is no mechanical connection between the beam and column, and the beam and floor. It is recommended that 2- Simpson A23 be used to connect the column to the floor and the column to the LVL beams. 14. In Unit 10 Building"B", and as typical throughout all units, a triple top plate has been attached to the top of the CMU demising wall. The bottom chords of the gable truss need to be attached to the triple top plate. 15. Based upon conversations with the mechanical sub-contractors and JKS it was determined that the ledgers on the CMU walls may be cut to allow for piping to extend to the second floor. In cutting the ledger,an additional specified adhesive anchor will be required each side of the cut if they are not placed between two adjacent anchors. CEC stated that a 4"edge distance from the end of the ledger and from the Simpson joist hangers shall be maintained. ' - -,. ' r.h'.e. ,.tic.^�•:9 M. ar. .Y ' .. ►Trade Winds Residences Page 3 of 3 October 4,2007 Field Inspection Report#25 16. Installed seat angles supporting steel second floor beams in Building"A"(as directed by K&K)require grouting of spalled CMU wall, straightening of plate washers,torquing of nuts and tack welding of all nuts. 17. CEC informed Ray(JKS)that steel columns which were stitched together in Building"A" (see field inspection report#23)need to have a clip angle welded to the two side perpendicular to the CMU wall.These clip angles are then to be attached to the CMU wall with adhesive anchors. This is to ensure the column stability. 18. Richard Scanlan informed CEC that they hired their own engineer to design the connection for the wall panels, as the wall panel manufacturer will not provide these details. If you have any questions regarding the above,please contact our office. Submitted by: Jon Downing,EIT Date JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart D.•IDOCIC766001166841166840IVnspectionslField Inspection Report 25.doc j' Y v 4 a n v , l I I PIN %c Steel beam in Unit 5 Building "A"at original fireplace opening. LVL beam resting on LVL column in Building "A" in place of steel beam. No mechanical fastening present. First floor framing r _ at original First floor framing at fireplace in ' ' "` � . original fireplace in Building "A" Building "A" looking looking northeast. r southwest. C16684.01 10/4/07 - DAM/dlb 1 All } K " -01 ro 40 ct Back side of seat angle which supports the steel beam in Unit LVL beam attached to LVL ledger in Building "A"with Simpson 6. Note spalled CMU and overlapping plat washers. hangar. } « Wr el t L, 4 yN t �c [ +rF 1 '' ,+• i'�� e�t�d �{ y1 '` w` �r � �� LVL beam resting on AT LVL column. No Back side of seat angle which supports the steel beam in.Unity , ;{ + s t- mechanical fastening 6. Note spalled CMU and overlapping plat washers. present. +01 C16684.01. 10/4/07 DAM/dlb 2 IN T Connection of roof trusses to LVL header in Building "B" Unit 10 x a c t r Approximate 2 '/2" hole in :• » Approximate 3" hole in 2x4 base plate in �� 2x4, second floor bearing 61 second floor bearing wall. This condition ; # ; e � wall. This condition is _ -- is unacceptable and requires unacceptable and requires reinforcement. reinforcement. r .. air _ a C16684.01 10/4/07 DAM/dib 3 y y • r i Aft a r ` ti ! s ' � No permanent bracing present in Building "B roof trusses. , v *- n ' . Fractured web member in girder truss. Building B", Unit 10 � n Unit 10 in Building "B" -- top nails in hurricane tie missing. C16684.01 10/4/07 DAM/dlb 4 i y t OASTAL NGINEERING ` OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #10 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: July 12,2007 at 1:00 PM Barnstable,MA Weather: Hot, Sunny, 80°Ff Present at Site: Jon Downing,Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc.(CEC) David Robbins,J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) Richard Scanlan(JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of David Robins(JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for the crawl space bump- outs on the southeast and northeast comers of Building"A". 1. Footing forms were observed to be placed for the bump-outs as called for on plans. 2. It was observed that the rebar placement for the footings was in accordance with CEC plans. Footing dowels.appeared.to be 45 bars spaced at 16" o.c. and allow for at least 30" lap with the footing dowels. Transverse bars appeared to be#4 bars at 16" o.c.,which is closer than specified and is acceptable. ett j�.'. Continuous longitudinal bars appeared to be 3-#4 with a minimum of 20"daps,equally spaced as specified. Footing forms.appeared to be 12"thick as specified. Dowels appeared to be adhered into existing footing as-called for. 3. .The relocated pier in building"B"was observed.It was noted that the bars in the pier were acceptable(see attached), and that there was a 3"x 5" section of the pier not sitting on concrete.Due to the fact that this area was already backfilled and compacted,CEC informed David Robbins that the pier could be poured. Submitted by: owning E.I.T. cam_. w: Project Engineer C= ' r— a N JD/dlb Enclosure: Photo showing relocated pier—Bldg. `B" ' cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,.Inc. (Andrew Baker) =rr LO Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh.-__ John Stewart r ; L, ,, ': . r*s � r David-A Morand,P E:, SECB(CEC)-•, ,.-, -,,, t . °- j' .r , ..._ "L. ,.. T. ...r r .t '� f� a,t ..: . L., •c „ '� .. � 4 t »-.....- ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ e a •LA a. pAj k64/ Relocated pier—Building`B" F OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 5087487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #24 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 7.80 Cra "gville Beach Road ,: Date7Tiine: October 3; 2007 at'7:30AM, Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm,Foggy, 62°Ff Present at Site: Jon Downing, Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) Ray Devita, J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) David Robbins(JKS) A field inspection wasmade at the requestAof J K .Scanlan;to verify form geometry and rebar placement for the utility room wall by Unit,Lcrawl space in.Building"',X% the following was observed: 1. The-rebar and forming of the footings for the-rear. ing Build !WA deck(SK=.16)were observed.a. 'The.footmgs wereiapproximately:T-6" x2'-6"„as specified. to�(, b. The footings had 444 bars each way in the footing, as specified c. The footings had 4,-#4 vertical dowels.with,12".hook;.plans call.for 446.bars.':-Ray-(JKS)was.informed of this. CEC was informed by Ray that.the bars will be replaced with#6 bars(see attached picture). d. The ties for the piers were#4 square ties at approximately 10" O.C., as specified. e. One of the footings had rebar placed;within 1",of.the form;.27,in is required. 2. CEC observed the area-in the retaining wall between Buildings "A" and "B",where the deck1piers forbuilding "A"are to be located.-Based on the location where the centers of the piers are marked to be located by,(JILS there is enough room for the specified pier. CEC informed Ray(JKS)that the vertical#6 bars for th piers may be drilled and epoxied into the retaining wall footing.(See attached.pictures). ? --� 3. The wall for the utility room by Unit l,crawl space was.observed:, b a.• The wall had#5 bars horizontal at approximately 12"_O.C.placed approximately in the"center of the walfi. as specified. -- b. Two#5 bottom bars were obseryed,.as specified CD t -' c.; The all,thickness was measured:to,be 4pproximately 10", as.specified ::. m Vertical rebar appeared to have approximately the-minimum 30" lap length required to th footing dowels. e The corner barswere a roximatel;,2 0 . aDp y ' ",x T-O",:as specified: , f Horizontal bars appeared;tobe epoxied into thet,existingtfoundation..walls g. Vertical bars appeared to be#5 bars at approximately 16"O.C., as specified. ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ i Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 October 3,2007 Field Inspection Report#24 4. Footings for HSS steel columns at the garage area were observed: a. These footings were inspected during the previous inspection(refer to Field Inspection Report#23). b. A single vertical rebar embedded into the soil was noticed to still be located at the center of the footings. Ray(JKS)was informed that the vertical rebar must be removed prior to placing concrete. 5. Part of the original foundation wall had damage at the top. J.K. Scanlan was in the process of cutting the damaged portion out. Ray(JKS)informed CEC that they want to drill and epoxy#4 bars at 12" O.C. and run a#4 horizontal bar and place concrete to match the existing geometry. CEC informed Ray that#5 bars will likely be needed,but will check back at the office and inform on 10-3-07. After checking in the office Ray (JKS)was informed by phone that the rebar for the infill should be#4 vertical bars at 12"O.C. and epoxied in 3/4"diameter holes with 8"embedment and 4" minimum edge distance. The horizontal bars should be 1- #4 bar 3"clear from the top of the wall,and epoxied similar to the vertical bars. CEC was informed that the infill will be poured structural concrete and C21 bonding agent with latex will be used as a wet on wet application. 6. As leaving the site,Dave (JKS)inquired about a lintel over the window in the CMU wall closest to the street in building"A". CEC was informed that the mason brought.2-L5"x 3 1/2"x 5/16"hot-dipped galvanized angle to the site to use as a lintel. Due to the location of and the length of the opening(38")CEC informed JKS that the lintel size had to be checked in the office. Dave(JKS) inquired if note 17 under masonry on sheet S-0 covered the requirements for the lintel, CEC informed JKS that the not applies to the opening,but that it doesn't cover the lintel. Ray(JKS)was informed per phone conversation that the lintel should be a L5" x 3 1/2"x 5/16"hot-dipped galvanized angle with the long leg vertical. The angle is also to bear a full 8". minimum on solid grouted masonry with at least'l full height.#5 bar in the grouted cell. 7. CEC observed that no rebar was sticking out of the CMU wall during placement, CEC was informed previously and confirmed on the phone that the rebar was being placed when the cells are filled with grout. If you have any questions regarding the above,please contact our office. Submitted by: Jon Downing,EIT Date JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart David A. Morand,P.E.;SECB (CEC)' J D.•IDOCIC16600116684116684.0]UnspectionslField Inspection Report 24.doc :'A++.. y y q r � ��' R - . � a,� Y `k Cl' .1� � ,�,5 k � "1 6 .F I ti•np . ? ''.x`_ ,".`..•I. �' S,i, - _" s� �. V `1 y,x, +•`.hrr f" } `�"b,R?. I f ' J•r' M.+1 �Jf" L a. ='1lwi, r •C ` R .:q f y�'P rk ro �yr �.d -� w �: a>- *��• i - r �44 "�" Z!I Rk Mw x r x,. P x�' ...� ,r: f Ix. I :• H :�� � Sa n 'tw x�,�� 6 - :" - :�, � .. �`^'e��°J' �, t..� � Ye.k fir,•� �,�'�," ` �� ` i,.._ �> � . k z Center of deck pier. vk �� a.n f. � ,,�t�uc ��"``Y�,+�T.^ r •;,y,t� r ,. AIR. 0 -z y f *S #4 vertical bars at deck Area of foundation repair. piers where#6 vertical bars are required. .y� ' lit C16684.01 October 3, 2007 JMD/dlb 1 OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 ■ Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #27 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road' Date/Time: October 16,2007,at 12:00 Noon Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, Sunny,65°Ft Present at Site: Chad B.Hill,Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) Ray Devita,J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of Ray Devita(JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for the interior steel column strip footing and(4)F3 type footings in the northwest side of building"A". • All longitudinal rebar appeared to be 345 bars equally spaced and is non-conforming to CEC plans. JKS was notified of this and two additional bars will be added. 0t • All dowels appeared to be#5 bars 16"o.c.with 12"hooks at bottom as specified. • All transverse bars appeared to be#4 bars placed 16"o.c. as specified. • The base soils appeared to be disturbed by foot traffic from tying rebar together. CEC specifies that all base soils need to be compacted and evaluated prior to placing concrete. JKS informed CEC that all footings have been- compacted,however,the sandy soils are easy to disrupt. • Form geometry at strip footing was approximately 12"deep by 2'-6"as specified. Form geometry for all F3 footings appeared to be sized at 3'-0"x 3'-0"x 12"deep as specified. • CEC also observed three 1'-0"x 1'-0"piers with 446 vertical bars equally spaced and#4 square ties at 10"O.C..It appears that the#6 vertical bars have been doweled into the existing footing below. All form geometry and sizing is in accordance with CEC plans. • CEC also observed the finish siding being placed on the rear face of building"B"prior to any res.'olve witf�the shear wall design issues. - Submitted by: r s, Chad B.Hill Date Structural Engineering Technician r ; CBH/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ ♦.„..ta�`4.4 F� t � j •.� _ '+.�^� '.�. 1 e __ 1ada.: r sr ��{*w,;! �` •awV�}"' ��` ,l�, sy�"^'"�S '4.� ..'K�,+- yr' �t �� - _ •^,�` �' y ) 1 i k'i,�+�,7.`. 4'►w.;,,,�> �,�r��,� i P.w• t� „�° "i 'w+k'l. s y � 1 } i �• S y.A� t"sF ri �' ^.��e r` � :..,o _ ,.-.-:.ram ..�' a G.?1FR Y' - �; .i� � � ,•Yy. f'�- ^ ��r� ���t\s`t \F a' 0 •,der"T- ,3 rW6 it�� �e � �- \ i1S /' • �i.. � �'.'� ° rL`t' -f. .f�p, • a°s:c ?. .% .; Rtir* ,,/J ,- � .3� '�.�r�`�� �e s .i. k' ��'i;y `y7��"#- � ,• '. ,,., ��* r.�` r c 4 k t rt `' ,� .i �r . .M F Raef�+yw r'{1 "ram-y '- .x. y d.- �;? ,�4 . d�+' ��� `+�' .yf :'t �•�,,:Y""�� . "ANIII+��� } �r'r�"e��� l ,���i� a�' �r ,� iF e "r ��� 'fax' c'x� �Mf� + e ' �` '� `"•,�! ,,,�"; -� l.r'. % `A �': .�!'+"ca. �,�c:: 2Fi },rrk ti;�+ } � � .r �, �;�•� l� �--.� X e Y^:y rr�'"� rv"�1"r�, .„y�, r+,.7"''' •�, �� 1p, ,- r- +ia.,P� ... ..`mow ..:\r .. _ .d ,.p..�•�'� r :., �� j,."�„".M1. M.. • " '�j+ - ":. fy'. 1 II f'.�h'��� r .l ?"3:'"}wr t YR' s. �°w ;�•vR'�+. �"v �`��` , r , r, e., `Y r�u ''"�' >. t .. .., 't, ' 't « 'ram '' ,<a• tr " �h. Y '.`"�,'.+k., ,�e,,.,., ,"'tea., '!` )' y« �"•V .. � v,yra� �/e J +..-« •ts .. d�' \Gw'� ro _ ,� . All ',�"• i �f.."���"r:�,D�'T�'a�� �i r s.wi„ ��'`` Il� �` :�� �;..,r s r `,J^` -'."+.>l Mrs, °R ..� s �� -YM F 7� a �., r � • .. z�. �._ Al .'�M. =4N'`"rEf" r�'' j �w"e_�A_, � '1- fi45 l C16684.01 10/16/07 CBH/dlb 1 f Q C � n J. L •' x . f "-1�-.. - i ' y,;. `fir � �• '' �.. - � � r P f - - ("V La IP NO il Y * r m e S v� F'�. _ �� ,sty] 4 (.r �4� s��• � - ' At,r WS+t �. rr Y.. �-w +� yy C16684.01 10/16/07 CBH/dlb 2 ti s r . bp.. �` :.'' ` � >, 1 4.. fI�L;yy, �,+�� r'�,+,iY 5k2T .a—xx�•:.• a'„"'4 ro. .. `�:: VAX w � t°�. C16684.01 10/16/07 CBH/dlb 3 T Y r a ° i y • .02 gE�;, ri y^� -mow r .r.w,k•='a#. s. '"vari st,w' ttn w — _ t r ' P r4 k ) � {}} .. • (( ,gyp 1' Y' .,' S ' C16684.01 10/16/07 CBH/dlb 4 F OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 ■ Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 0 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #29 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 180 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: November 1,2007 at 12:00 PM Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, Sunny, 60°Ff Present at Site: Jon Downing' Coastal Engineering Co. Inc. (CEC) I �� David Morand(CEC) Richard Scanlan, J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) Ray Devita, (JKS) David Robbins(JKS) A field inspection was made to review,current framing issues,and shear wall issues. The following was noted: 1. The following issues from Field Inspection Report#25 were reviewed: a. Test reports were provided for the crawl space lab in Building"A". It was previously noted_that no testing appeared to be present. (Item 2b) € g b. JKS provided CEC with the 56-day test for the concrete walls in building"D". Theconcrete strength was tested to be 4090-psi compared the required 4000-psi required. CEC informed�KS that the concrete for the walls in building"D"was acceptable. (Item 4) c. CEC noted that no blocking or web stiffeners in the I joists were placed as required,though ceiling strapping has already been placed. Shawnlee informed CEC that the blocking and web stiffeners would' be placed when time permits. (Item 6) d. It was noted that the 2 i1/2 diameter holes through the studs in Unit 10,Building' did not have; scabs added on,JKS was informed that this must be done. (Item 9) M e. In Unit 10, Building"B"the girder truss with the previously noted break had a 2xJ scab placed on either side,with the scab being spliced at the bottom 1/3 of the web member. According to the manufacturer's certified repair for this truss, there should be an 8' long 2x4 centered on the break on each side of the truss and nailed with 2.rows of I Od nails at 4"O.C. (Item 10) f. The roof trusses that have Simpson H10 connectors which are missing the top four nails are acceptable, as the top 4 nail holes are optional according to the hanger manufacturer's literature. (Item 12) g. The roof trusses,which are next to the CMU wall,have been attached to the CMU wall with threaded rods which appear to be epoxied into the CMU wall. This is an acceptable means to laterally brace the roof trusses to the CMU demising wall. (Item 14) -Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ Trade Winds Residences November 9,2007 Field Inspection Report#29 h. Item 16 was not reviewed. This refers to the grouting of spalled CMU wall, straightening of plate washers, torquing of nuts and tack welding of all nuts. i. The steel columns,which were bolted together vertically,had a clip angle welded to the two.sides perpendicular, on the upper column to the CMU wall, and appears to be attached to the CMU wall with adhesive anchors. This is an acceptable way to laterally brace the column. 2. The Steel for Building"D"was reviewed to make sure that the anchor bolts have enough edge distance from the face of the concrete piers. After reviewing the requested columns, CEC informed Ray(JKS)that the steel appears to be located to allow the anchors to have enough concrete edge distance. 3. The welding of clip angle seats at the exterior steel columns of Building "C" were verified and found to be sufficient. 4. The issues in Building"A"where the posts supporting the roof do not align, (3)- 1 3/4"x 11 7/8"LVL beams are needed to be added underneath the posts in question. Some I joists may need to be removed to properly place the LVL Beams. 5. The wall panels that, according to JKS, are 9"too short in height were reviewed. The area affected is the lower floor of Building"A"and is for a length of about 100 linear feet of wall. JKS proposal to add(1)-2x6 bottom plate on top of the existing wall panel with 2x6 studs at 16"o.c. and a new double top wall plate. This appears to be acceptable, assuming that the wall sheathing extends approximately 1'-6"beyond the new scab wall piece. The replaced sheathing should be nailed with l Od nails at 4"o.c. at the edges and 8"o.c. in the field. CEC informed JKS that a second option is to stick frame the walls in question on site. 6. The shear walls for Building"A"were evaluated on the east and west side, as the south and north side had no wall panels present. The following was observed: a. On the west side of the building, sheathing appeared to be nailed with 10d nails with an average approximate spacing of 3.5"o.c at the edges. b. On the east side of the building, sheathing appeared to be nailed with 10d nails with an average approximate spacing of 4"o.c at the edges. c. The wall sheathing appeared to be applied so'that there was no sheathing lap from panel to panel d. The panels appeared to be fastened together with(2)to(3.)-10d nails at approximately 2'-6"o.c. Please provide a minimum of 16d(3 1/2" long)annular-ring nails, spaced no more than 4 inches on center to stitch the panels together along their vertical transitions. e. Many corners of the buildings do not have any nails to attach the exterior wall sheathing to the back up studs.Full heights of the building need to be securely nailed off,to transition shear and connect panels appropriately. Please visit all exterior surfaces of the buildings to ensure that the panel perimeter nailing is placed as originally specified using the 10d nails. 7. Many gaps still exist between the wall panels. These need to be solidly and continually.blocked and completely nailed as indicated above. 8. Buildings"B"and"C"appeared to be fully sided,therefore the nailing of the sheathing to the wall panels could not be determined. CEC informed JKS that all exterior sheathing and all framing needs to be inspected before siding,insulation, or finishes are applied. 9. CEC informed JKS that the strap connections,which have already started to be placed, are needed for all . buildings. Strapping should be placed in accordance to the letter dated 10-17-07 by Bruce Alexander. 10. Due to the connection of the sheathing to the wall panels from floor to floor, CEC recommends that the wall panels be attached to either the double rim joist or the floor joists, depending on the location,with 41/2" Simpson SDS screws at 6"o.c. 11. Proper toenailing, or other approved means of attaching the floor joists to sills and top wall plates,needs to be verified. .Trade Winds Residences November 9,2007 Field Inspection Report#29 12. Truss bracing, including web bracing, gable end bracing, and the gable modified bracing due to the Boston Hip details need to be placed ASAP. The trusses are NOT braced properly, and could pose a safety or lateral stability concern. 13. In Building"A"Unit 8, a triple 1 3/4"LVL is supported on a notched 5 1/4"x 5 1/4"LVL post and a 2x6 stud. The LVL beam is not mechanically attached to the support post. The beam should be attached to the LVL post with 2-5/8"diameter by 6" long lag screws. If you have any questions regarding the above,please contact our office. Submitted by: . Jon Downing, EIT Date JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart 5, • 1 D:IDOCIC166001166841166840117nspectionslField Inspection Report 29.doc r'r W 4 .ram r 1 ' II << "t � - - ' i• ^fir u' s ti yxW 1 1. )x r ! r �y35- yt $ A - t exterior steel column of Building "C"were verified Typical roof truss next to the CMU wall.Attached to CMU wall Clip angle seats a g YP P 9 to be welded. with thread rods epoxied into the CMU wall. r 1 i t rt. •"'-- ' ' Typical connection o = = Simpson H-10 tie - connecting wall top plate 2x4 splice noted in Building "B"girder truss web member with break. 8Y roof truss. C 16684.01 11/1/07 JMD/dlb 1 � y c ❑ ,xs Scab on 2x4 repair for Typical clip angle connection for girder truss in Building °B" spliced 4"x4"columns in r with break in the web. Building A. rr 4 v _ Y Y i f t K � 4 i >4 `L g4 tt w No blocking or web Note that no nailing g stiffeners as required in 2"d d t d was provide a edge of ' floor joists in Building "A". 1 sheathing. Note that strapping has been placed. C 16684.01 11/1/07 JM D/dlb 2 i ��` r. ��+.�� � ;•'•s. '�v ice' - s 1� ��}e� '' ,� y yy i f .r`h •� �� � `per �� r,. ��� �5#�� � j� � � lk Sheathing on wall LVL post notched to panels end at top of ? }`" `" r support LVL beam in a. ,. . ,� wall panel. No lap I 1 . = fW Building A'. Note no provided. mechanical connection provided. F r .P^ t t t: Corner at Building , ` - y Note that no nailing was } f - "A"where no nailing {. provided at edge of of sheathing to outer`; `� ' ` " sheathing. •r:, stud provided. C 16684.01 11/1/07 JM D/dlb 3 '� �' �"t, �n a .• off �f t -. iii Y �v T�^" �s,r.r�;�: r :�g�1 ...• I et � ' �l• i �l���,, ted��R�,�� ig ems'.�y .�, � q'"�`�—"•'` y y 6 -�„'•PO ''e'} A 4 IZAS ' I 41 71 1 Note bow in exterior �� ••=�y• ����. k '.rc ; sheathing on Building �.����; �� ,��;�,�; y �+� Gap located on east side of Building A"at demising wall. vo- .: »�,,•, t :i x:. °i d- h+y '.� .mil pM h R r Average nailing spacing on west side of Building "A" 3.5'. r _ _ Note that a maximum of 2 nails in window wall panels were found. ✓ �"�= . 7 C16684.01 11/1/07 JMD/dlb 4 OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT.#26 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: October 09,2007,at 12:00 Noon Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, Sunny,65°Ff Present at Site: l l�I Chad B. Hill, Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) Ray Devita,J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) A field inspection was made at the request of Ray Devita(JKS)to verify form geometry and rebar for the interior steel column strip footing located in building"A". • All longitudinal rebar appeared to be 344 bars equally spaced as specified in CEC plans. • All dowels appeared to be#5 bars 16"o.c. with 13"hooks at bottom as specified. • All transverse bars appeared to be 44 bars-placed 16"o.c. as specified. • The base soils appeared to be disturbed by foot traffic from tying rebar together. CEC specifies that all base soils need to be compacted and undisturbed prior to placing concrete. JKS will correct. • Form geometry at strip footing was approximately 12"deep by 2'-6"as specified. Form geometry for F1 and F2 appeared to be sized as specified. • CEC observed water collecting in the foundation of building"D"stairwell,approximately 140"deep. JKS was informed of this and advised to remove the water. ' a ems,, Submitted by: Chad B. Hill Date �� CU Structural Engineering Technician CBH/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart D:DOCIC16600116684116684011InspectionslField Inspection Report 26.doe ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ T d 1 v. �w 4 .�.• e..�av�t - ��ttia'�` >.�,,, � �'� A•e'^t i Y*�! ."�,p•, g...<�. &.` *`i+ _. ' : � yf'; rAy.. - f'1' �'`A `Y ♦` 7 Ik . , +a I ..:.ate�� � a. � s, � 1�"�if' d- I .F`�� 4�' �"• 46 w � � N y < k'�{f �tl u hr C16684.01 10/9/07 CBH/dlb 1 _ t ' `{Y .'�r � ..� .� ?+� � ".... ,.. ,. � .'fir•, � ,'may"` 5•.� G•�" - .�` Y{1�^`E , #I �` �{��'� �� .a,1. . I'.� .'fie' � '�`{^_` •�r F _ . m a . . A 1 C ` n , r f , . t e xf en •S'.7�'��' .9. ." .:, x y r: ! p�' ^aa°ar �yY p 3,, y ..:J. > j„ +'� f f� •!''.�.�J' ,_^ ��"h" •s,,'.. a,u,%� � Lt � Yn•f �•.q'• �' ° ;[ as u -Wr r ,.ai is.d.�„Sd'S3-' ;'�b'L" ."`•* �4w.:scaY:'.�1.�, C16684.01 10/9/07 CBH/dib 2 t i a l l•� r w C16684.01 10/9/07 CBH/dlb 3 NGINEERING 200e BAN _ AM OMPANY, INC. �� 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 ., _ www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 bf ) Iyannis 508-778-9600 ■ Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #38 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craig'ville Beach Road Date/Time: Wednesday,Dec. 26, 2007, at 2:00 PM Barnstable,MA c�d,l� Weather: Cool, cloudy, 40'Ft Present at Site: David Robbins-J. K. Scanlan.Co., Inc. (JKS) Dan-JKS Jon Downing-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) W'field_inspectiori was made per therequest of David Robbins to'rev ew•the'final framing'at'the south half of Building"A"; whicli inc ludes'Unrts 6 through 8 The following was observed _ r. �l. In Uriits'6'tlirougl "8 it`was!'observed that the exterior wall`panel were fastened to the'structure below with"tfie'specified Simpson brackets and SDS screws. 2. In Units 8 and'7 if was observed that the back dormer"(facing Building"D")was not-built according to plans. CEC plans show the dormer rafters as 2"x10"rafters supported by a 13/4"x`11 7/8"LVL ridge beam and(2)-13/4"xl 1 7/8"valley beams.However the LVL'ridge beam has no support at either end and is built as a ridge board. The outside end of the ridge beam was cut short of the exterior wall to allow a small hip to be added to the top of the dormer. CEC informed Dan that this must be reviewed back at the office. 3. hi Unit 8 the LVL which supports the back porch was not fully nailed to the hanger_. Dan was informed and the LVL was fully nailed to thehanger prior to leaving the site. �. I Units and � «�, oo,�� �liat iastcri5ilie game truss at each unit to the CIMU demising wail were not fully tightened. CEC was informed that the bolts were not tightened because they were recently placed and were waiting for the epoxy to cure. These bolts were fully tightened prior to leaving the site. 5. In Unit 7 one of the short LVL's;which support the trusses by Unit 6, was missing nails in the connector. This was immediately corrected. 6. The end bracing at the Unit 5 cheek wall was completed as CEC described, with extending the temporary' bracing on the vertical web member to the gable wall to become permanent bracing. 7.. The.web'met'begs observed that had a TV"—added on the top to•forn'a T cross section'for lateral bracing appear ed`to be:securely'faSteried to fhe tru'ss�. 8. In'Unif 6',_6 ie'of the'header's was missing a T-bracket-to`attach'the L`VL,he'gder`to the`p. This work Was performed, and was observed as being completed,before CEC left the site. 9 The exterior wall studs that wer'e''cHecked were see=ur'ely'att'ached to the`sheathing 10..Iri the concrete Sonotube foofings'(2)'between Units 3,and 4"the following was=observed. ...a."...The rebar_was securely-fastened-.to-the sonotube with-approximately-2' of-cover all around: -" ■Providing solutions,for the benefit of our clients and community■ Y 4 Trade Winds Residences Page 2 of 2 January 2,2008 b. The sonotube was 16"diameter as specified. The footing size could not be determined as the . footing was buried. c. The vertical bars were 545 bars equally spaced. The vertical bars had a minimum of 25" lap to the dowels. d. It was observed that the dowels rested on chair bars to obtain the proper concrete cover. e. The ties were#3 bars spaced at approximately 10"o.c. f. According to David Robbins, the compaction testing was performed last week and was determined by Briggs to be acceptable. . Submitted by: Jon Downing, F.I.T. JMD/dlb cc: J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart D:IDOCIC1660011668411668401IInspectionsIField Inspection Report 38.doc WTI ,NGINEERING ���1�'' cPF "AR��S'`�B�"E OMPANY, INC. 2000 JAN —3 AID IP 57 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte.6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-Lqk,P§f@N' ■. Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #37 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: Friday,Dec. 21,2007,at 2:30 PM Barnstable,MA (v Weather: Cool, sunny,40'Ft Present at Site: David Robbins-J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) (01 David A. Morand-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) Jon Downing—CEC A field inspection was made to review the framing at the south half of-Building.`,'A'i which included Units 6 through 8; ­' the following was observed: 1. Several of the LVL headers which support partial roof trusses in Unit 8,need more nailing of the connector and connectors placed at-some locations. The lateral restraint at some of the LVL headers was questionable.After reviewing the plans back at the office,there should be a ridge supporting the dormer roof adjacent.This will be confirmed at the full framing inspection on 12/26/07,as discussed with David Robbins. 3. It:was observed that most of the Simpson SDS screws have not been placed to secure the wall panels to the structure below. Scanlan has stated that they have not yet completed this work. 4. In several places,the Simpson LS90 connectors have not been added to secure the wall panels to the structure below. David Robbins informed CEC that they had not finished placing all of the Simpson LS90 connectors. 5. David Robbins informed CEC that he will call on 12/26/07 to confirm if the framing is.ready for a full inspection. 6. Additional nails are required in beam hangers at short LVL truss headers. T Some additional metal tie connecters(L's or T's)are needed to attach posts to beams. 8. Roof truss bracing needs to be resolved at the Unit 6 check wall. 9. Some truss web tee-bracing was not securely nailed,resulting in segregated pieces. Submitted by: Jon Downing; .2.1 '( . ✓F..V �:.. r J lY T: -�*� .. '�i' (,iS JM1 1b k }t r `! f1)C- i` — Cll ar �� :iJ..: i 12.,e11 �Sr J •..:r T. is S) 9t�:C . (l: cc: J:K:�Scanlarr:Co?Inc:' +� 5, l:,.�re Keenan&Kenny;Arch tects;•t}z•F :.1ccq J11 James Walsh DrIDOCIGl6'6o6ii6684111668401finspecti6nslFieldi7 iS ecti6h'keport37doc ■Providing solutions for the benefit of our,clients and community■.' IOASTAL NGINEERING ��� 9�,R � �81E OMPANY, INC. 2PBO JAN -3 A410: 51 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte. 6A),Orleans,MA 02653 - www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.com Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hy i-A1S!6K7.78-9600 Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT #36 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: Trade Winds Residences ' Job No: C16684.01 Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Date/Time: Weds.,Dec. 19, 2007, at 10:10 AM Barnstable,MA C h Weather: Cool, cloudy;40'Ff Present at Site: V Ray Devita-J. K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) David A. Morand-Coastal Engineering Co.,Inc. (CEC) A field inspection was made at the request of JKS to evaluate the CMU grouting around the two steel seat angles within Building`"A T.he--following was noted: 1. Three (3) 1-inch diameter holes were placed into the surrounding CMU wall at the two (2) steel seat angle ,•-,J aocations which support the second floor steel beams.The hole locations were marked by CEC at locations in the block which were both accessible with the drill and representative of localized block cells. 2. All three (3)holes at each angle support location resulted in having a solidly filled grout infill within the block cells, as evident by the three(3)inch deep drilled-holes. Based upon the field observations by CEC for the apparent extent of grouting within the existing CW wall areas around the seat angles, CEC hereby includes this seat angle construction for the two(2) second floor beam support locations within Building"A" into the framing approval for the structure. Submitted by: La MA' David A. Morand,RE.,,SECB Structural Division.Manager DAM/dlb t;ld N 1.l i7 S 1., .. ! ! f its E. !, f.ii.L): u.t_L .{' 1 l :•� ..i_i.>>., 1 }E t i. ,i •tti�w r:. }Jt'I!ar. .<':%;t.�. s_ 1°`ti } f cc: J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. ;1. ,, Keenan,&;KennyArchitects JamesrWalsh T. :. �.;; .�� _i: . .t ,,. I f ... , _•.;t z r,, c, .. l.i 4'_. John Stewart D:IDOCIC166001166841166840I11nspectionsIField Inspection Report 36.doc Providing solutions for the benefit of our clients and community■ Barrows, Debi From: Rudziak, Jeff Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 3:34 PM To: Barrows, Debi Cc: Perry, Tom Subject: RE: Trade Winds Map & Parcel#'s It appears that the master deed has not been recorded yet. We need that to be able to assign the new numbers. -----Original Message----- From: Barrows, Debi Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 3:25 PM To: Rudziak, Jeff Subject: FW: Trade Winds Map & Parcel #'s -----Original Message----- From: Perry,Tom Sent: Thursday,June 28, 2007 2:06 PM To: Barrows, Debi Subject: RE:Trade Winds Map&Parcel #'s Sure;l thought that this was ALL SET before?ls it because now it has reverted back to the old way with three sets of ways to assign the# -----Original Message----- From: Barrows, Debi Sent: Thursday,June 28, 2007 11:38 AM To: Perry,Tom Subject: Trade Winds Map&Parcel #'s Wendy from Glynn Electric called Assessing trying to get the map& parcel#'s for TradeWinds Condo's so that we can permit the 21 units. After speaking with Assessing Wendy informed us that we are to use the master map & parcel for all units and if we have a problem with this to go to the Assessors Office. This is totally unacceptable since each unit needs there own map & parcel assigned to them. That is why we have this new Munis system so that we can streamline the permitting and inspections process for each unit that needs to receive their own certificate of occupancy. This has not been a problem in the past, what has changed? Debi 1 C:elaterville-Ost.ervilleaMarstons Mills Water Department P.O.BOX 369- 1138 NIAIN STREET 0STE.1R`'ILL E,MASSA,CHUSETTS 02655 ?sa4�E 0, F� OFFICE OF WATER BOARD OF 1 AT FR COt INCSSiONERS DEPT.eyH WATER SUPERkNTE\DLNT �Py7o��rg TEL.No.i0'-425-E69' F.vx No.5W-42S-3,)O-q VIA FAX April 19, 2007 Town of Barnstable Building Department 367 Main Street. rt Hyannis, Ma 02601 Re: :00.A.CRAIG�'II_LE.BE, CH_RD.,CE1_�T•. Dear Mr.Perry: s Please find this letter as notice of termination of the water service to the above esidenGe. The owner plans to rebuild and ser-vice will be restored at fae appropriate time. " 5l67uld you have any question please call. zv� CD r, ri Since 1•yr° /� Craig Crocker Superintendent CAC;j eg Cc: Scanlon Const-motion mgb�iefcascbidgdc:ptie e °� SOS€-aab-Bos '4da❑ Jagem 41wo3 49t, :20 Go 61 J-Ju 01/14/2008 15:38 FAX 508 255 6700 COASTAL ENGINEERING Z 001 OAST AL NGINEERING - OMPANY,-INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte.6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.CoastalEngineeringCompany.coni Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 ■ Hyannis 508-778-9600 ■ Fax 508-255-6700 January 11,2008 Project No.C16684.01 Town of Barnstable Building Division 200:Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Advance Copy Via Fax: 508-790-6230 'Re: Trade Winds Residences Building"A",Units 5,6,7,and 8 Framing Approval 780 Craigville Beach Road,Barnstable,MA Dear Barnstable Building Division: Coastal Engineering Company,Inc. (CEC)has performed the Building"A"Framing Punchlist for Units, 5, 6,,7,and 8 as indicated upon our Structural Field Inspection Reports No. 37 through 39.CEC has performed a follow up field inspection on Tuesday,January 08,2008 (Stnictural Field Inspection Report No.40)to verily that the outstanding punch-list items have been resolved per our initial field visit observations. As such,we hereby approve the final.wood and structural steel framing construction associated with Building"A", for Units 5,6,.7, and 8 at the Trade Winds Condominiums project. Please note that this letter representq the framing approval only, and is not intended to serve as the final structural affidavit sign-off of the project to obtain occupancy. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require any additional information regarding this matter. Very truly yours, CUAS':I:'AL ENGINEERING CO.,INC. David A. Mora.nd,P.E., SECB Structural Division Manager DAM/dlb Enclosure cc: David Robbins(via fax:'508-790-0329) John Stewart Jim Walsh - /j.•IDl)(:1C.766UUI166841766340/TC.orrrrcpaideneell_c��trrRlrlgDey�_0/1108,doC ■Providing solutions b),the benefit of o-ur clients anal.communit3�■ 01/14/2008 15:39 FAX 508 255 6700 COASTAL ENGINEERING a 002 OASTAL NGINEERING OMPANY, INC. 260 Cranberry Highway(Rte.6A),Orleans,MA 02653 www.Coastdl'EnginceringCompany.coni Orleans 508-255-6511 Provincetown 508-487-9600 Hyannis 508-778-9600 ■ Fax 508-255-6700 STRUCTURAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT 440 To: Barnstable Building Department Project: 'Trade Winds Residences Job No: C16684.01 .Location: 780 Craigville Beach Road Aate/Tinte: Tuesday,Jan. 08,2008,at 7:30 AM Barnstable,MA Weather: Warm, cloudy, 50'rf Present at Site: David Robbins-J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc. (JKS) Jon Downing- Coastal Engineering Co:,Inc_ (CEC) A field inspection was made to review the completed construction for the reinforced dormer roof areas in Units 5-8 in Building"A';the following was observed: 1. The cathedral roof in Unit 7 and 8 was observed to have the following reinforcing: a. New 1 3/4 x 5 1/2" LVL.col lar ties on the opposing face of the existing collar ties at every other rafter(3 total)were placed. The end three rafters on the interior of the building had no supplemental collar ties. This is acceptable, as this end of the roof is less likely to spread due to the new post support that has been installed.continuous to the header below. b. The new LVL collar tie appeared to be attached to the rafter with an epoxy adhesive and five(5)7 SDS ` screws on each side of the new collar tie as`specif ed. - c. Att the interior end of the ridge beam,a 4"x 6" post from the underside of the ridge beam to the header below was provided. The post is attached to the ridge beam and header with Simpson PC series post caps. 2_ The arched roof and associated roof system was observed in Units 5 and 6.The following reinforcing was provided: a. A 2"x4".infill stud wal I was placed between the existing roof trusses at the dormer location extending from the existing header to the bottom of the existing ledger that supports the dormer roof as specified. b. It was observed that the specified(2)-2"xl0"header on top of the new wall infill was installed directly in back of the existing ledger_The new(2)-2"x10"header was attached to the stud wall with a piece of 2'-0 long x 1/2" OSB on the backside of the studs.The OSB was`attached to the studs with nails spaced at approximately 3"o_c. at the edges and 6"o.c_ in the field, as specified. c. The.ledger was attached to the new(2)-2"xl 0" header with 3 to 4 Simpson SDS screws. d. The infill stud wall was attached to the trusses with 2 nails next to each other spaced approximately 16" o.c. .e. At the location where the infill stud wall has a vent, there is a(2)-27'xl0"header above the vent. 3. The location of the posts to support the roof above the back deck on Unit"2"was discussed.The architectural plans do trot match the structural plans for the post location.Upon follow-up back at the office, it appears that Dave Robbins did not have the latest architectural drawings. ■Providingsolutions for the benefit of vur ch"-nis and corrtnzuniry■ 01/14/2008 15:39 FAX 508 255 6700 COASTAL ENGINEERING ' Z 003 Trade Winds Residences Page 2'of 2 January 8,2008 4. It was observed.that at the front porch area of Unit 8, there was a new patch in the concrete foundation,wall_ 5. It was noted that the back deck for Building"A"was being built_ CEC observed that the post base connector, which was previously noted to have been bent, has been unbent and the deck post attached.The connector appears to be in good condition. 6. It was observed that several of the wall panels on the back side of Building"A"at Units 2-5, had pieces of the exterior sheathing ripped off of the studs. It is not clear why this occurred. Submitted by_ Jon Downing,E.I.T. JM D/dlb cc_ J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc: Keenan&Kenny Architects James Walsh John Stewart r y D.nDOCICi660Oi l6684l l rh,440:L 1/nspecrionsIField/nspeciion Report 40.Jue. , DATE: 11 July 2006 � t Z 0 w I Q 4- J F- w 4- o co Z o (� I.I.! roe a) Loo - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - J ZIN01b U joLnC 0 Nook <CO N � Lo � Q ��Lf) ul N C > U � Z �+LN � '- N C I L 0 a) co rfh- __ co 30A-2P) 17 19 — (.0 o Co L 1 BEDROOM BEDROOM SLOPE T T wio wio UTILITY_ O + �2f6- �� BLOPG P e G UP it UP PG UP O 6 Z 6LOP�-V 9L_OPC I!P - GLOP!U G ll /D ° G I\ HI 2S ❑ / \ AT LAU F717 F LA D o nA D O(�D ° A o . P "" Q E7N- aATH I . H�AL A - o ° ° O HA L TH H L =EMT r6 � I M / /. BATH n 1 A A23 IB � 0 W Lf) � t \ A S3 $ "� 1 — — —SD S3 J� '`1 lA HAII Bay W S3 rj ON 190-- D Y oa N II D S S 3 l\i - -S - AQ I — — _ 1 W.I. t�L_J 20 n - S ON ON — LOS, S 1,�CAC� — � n =z, F25 I wio _z�, - - W.I.GF TIL. LIN. — A - 21 ������ M, BATH woe Aa- e UTIL 3 GFI A2 _ — ia' 4�7I I airs $ S 1 _ W.I, _._ I DRY -- — - 1 ° - L N — - _ oo \ SD A2 D 1. I — \BATH S AT woe W,l, Leo® -3� J ti A- aZF]a A /S __ S�1 W.I. A V4 S S 1 / /S _ S3 --—_a 16 LIN e / UTIL, LIN. OA LAS S,a $ Lz63ia 16 A D �I MASTER S \ — ]� 17 0 �I UNIT 7 UNIT 8 00 \ 06 At HALL A �` I 201 ROOM UNIT 3 B ZOOM BEDROOM UNIT 4 A I. A CL C WI• CCS Q AF TSB/ L \ W.I. A - Ol A4 Cu A, 53 DA - _ - — — $ \ ® \ co oz oz BEDROOM ` w 0 W.I. EDDROOM A��as— N A( A -- — — — _ -- MASTER / A _ MASTER _ w (30 O \ ' BEDROOM F M-1 � AC 19 g 19 10 M aAr_H QAAEDR� 6�DR/OM _ Q CS? GFI S3 A$-`Fd�- A6-204 1 ' 3 1 ♦r LTi) U IL A wP CC Lo � ccs CY — _ a- / \ `1 G 2 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 y C ` m � / ATH BAL 0 Y BA CONY / 1 \\ 21 1 l BALCONY BALCONY H1 „_ O \ zs ® ® Aa�tr� '+ Q S A UO UO A7-212 ra rer .� A © B 3ROOM F — SITE LIGHTING 3 F ----- — -- _ C m N U . 1 I •o S S PHOTOCELL S 17 A2 O I UNIT 2 FI 18 (� Qp wP C) AS W'I I S MASTER *TER O .N C A C C BEDROOM ROOM D 1 / ' c DR QrA �oNY 1 BALNT BEDROOM S� 4ti 17 F �. AL ONY L P-LA-N------ 1/8jj -T-0ij c c� n- o 0 J U w (D (D = W Cf) Y l wa i { V • SCALE: 1/8"=T-0" DRAWING NO. A- E13 Y