Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0120 SOUTH MAIN STREET (2) /r��_.....+a....,e,L�'--�Y`+"�a,�.��`r:uw..se-....... .„. ....._._.r..o......._✓......0 i�.. �..�i ".M,5.;6W4�,.u1 'M1 ..1�j�{/,/M����,������ /1(, ��`" x r� Y a Sign OF BARNSTABLE Permit BAMSTABLE, TOWN MASS. z6 Permit Number: Application Ref: 201304139 20070870 Issue Date: 06/21/13 Applicant: CAPE REGENCY LANDLORD MA, LLC Proposed Use: NURSING HOMES Permit Type: SIGN PERMIT Permit Fee $ 50.00 Location 120 SOUTH MAIN STREET Map Parcel 208089001 Town CENTERVILLE Zoning District SPLT Contractor PROPERTY OWNER Remarks CAPE REGENCY SIGN 15.97 SQ FT (MONUMENT UPDATED PANELS) Owner: CAPE REGENCY LANDLORD MA, LLC Address: 135 SOUTH MAIN STREET FARMINGTON, CT 06032 ti Issued By: SS YY(/ POST THIS CARb SQ THAT IS VISIBLE FRAM TlE S ET Oaeap a44� dvecated, 9&c..r ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-PLANNERS t, 105 Webster Street, Units 1 &2 Hanover, MA 02339 (781)878-0066 FAX(781)878-7060 E-mail: david@dhdunlap.com December 11, 2008 Mr. Thomas Perry, Director Building Division ' ( / t Town Hall 367 Main Street ' " V? Hyannis,MA 02601 Re: Cape Regency Assisted Living Dear Mr. Perry: Our office has compiled field reports from job meetings being held on a continuing basis at Cape Regency under Permit#B 20073078. This information is being provided to you for your records as required under controlled construction, Section 116.2.1 of the MSB, 780 CMR 6th Edition. Attached hereto are field reports for October 9 -December 11, 2008. Sincerely yours, D VIDH. D ASSOCIATE , David"HDunlap,Pr., CARB, AR President rol a44� dvecated, 9&c..r ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-PLANNERS t, 105 Webster Street, Units 1 &2 Hanover, MA 02339 (781)878-0066 FAX(781)878-7060 E-mail: david@dhdunlap.com J Y December 11, 2008 Mr. Thomas Perry, Director Building Division Town Hall t � ^,Q 367 Main Street ' " V? Hyannis,MA 02601 Re: Cape Regency Assisted Living Dear Mr. Perry: Our office has compiled field reports from job meetings being held on a continuing basis at Cape Regency under Permit#B 20073078. This information is being provided to you for your records as required under controlled construction, Section 116.2.1 of the MSB, 780 CMR 6th Edition. Attached hereto are field reports for October 9 -December 11, 2008. Sincerely yours, D VIDH. D ASSOCIATE , David"HDunlap,Pr., CARB, AR President } October 9, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Administrator Head of Radius' Maintenance Service from RI. Mary Lou Burgeson, Radius Jon Truslow, Radius Jim Goulet,Nauset Jon Teixeira,Nauset Al Deluca,Nauset Paul, Assistant Super Bob Griffiths,Hall Engineering David Dunlap, DHDA Purpose: Review the progress of the project and discuss how parking would be handled when the sitework commences so that there is minimal interference with the visitors and staff. Construction Administration 1. Completion Date: 1/2/09;Nauset indicated that they think there will be a 3- week slide on the schedule due to a variety of reasons. 2. Sewage Treatment Plant: A. We discussed the installation. No work appears to have proceeded relative to piping, wiring or ducting the area. B. Nauset confirmed that the subcontractor will be completed by mid- November so that testing can be done for EPA. C. It was reported that a tank has been installed for the treatment plant which is included in the sitework. They are getting ready to run the force mains. D. Discussed the installation of the leaching fields and the subcontractor advised Nauset that all (3) fields need to be installed at the same time, indicating that this is a code requirement. No one was sure what code or why. E. Reviewed a plan developed by Nauset Construction after meeting with 5 the sitework contractor. It shows that all of the parking on'the side of the leaching fields will be out of commission until the fields are in and tested. This does leave parking around the opposite side including (7) spaces to be added to the parking from the spaces that were previously under the building and changed based on value engineering. 3. Al Deluca has met with the administrator and reviewed the parking layout out plan which includes locating parking for staff and contractors off-site at possibly the Catholic church. The administrator advised that they had met and are anxious to see the project completed so they will agreed to the plan if it will expedite the completion of the sitework. 4. We were advised that C. Bassett and Briggs had met at the site and made a number of determinations relative to changes to the project. There was no documentation or overview of the changes. 5. We discussed ramps from the living room. The issue at hand is that there are no grades in this area and in order to calculate a ramp, stairs, etc. we will need elevations. We were advised that SS Design would be on-site on Saturday to obtain this information and work out a proposed ramp. 6. Job Super's Look Ahead was provided to those in attendance. 7. Shop Drawings: A. DHDA reviewed gyperete and mailed it to Nauset. B. Waiting for submissions on: 1. miscellaneous hardware" 2. toilet room accessories 3. building signage 4. kickplates, corner guards, etc. J. Teixeira stated that they will be sent momentarily. 8. Telephone/data Cable: The rep who will be provide and install the system is: Michael Baker, President/CEO, US Edge. J. Truslow is handling this and provided and overview of the system. He pointed out that this system is separate from the e-call and the intent is to have this.company due a walk-thru, discuss installation and coordinate this work with Nauset. 9. During the meeting we took an hour break so that Jon Truslow could review it a with the vendor. 10. PCO: Nauset provided a log and additional PCOs. 11. RFI: An RFI was provided regarding a different size dumpster pad be specified and information.provided. Evidently it turns out that there are (3) dumpsters that the owner is presently using. A question arose on whether a compactor needs to be installed. The site engineer looked at it and determined that to service what they had the dumpster pad is too long and would extend into the detention basin. This would be unacceptable to the conservation commission. Jon Truslow to review with the facility what they really need and report back. SS Design to locate and show the details for the pad. 12. Mary Lou asked if color selections are needed for the carpet,walls, ceiling, etc. Nauset advised that they were told to paint the walls a neutral color and that they were not sure the carpet should be replaced. A discussion ensued. Mary Lou was requested to get the colors from Anne to expedite the completion of this area. 13. We discussed toilet room accessories and determined that this needs to be revisited and changed to a more residential type. DHDA recommended that the medicine cabinets be purchased with a residential mirror that has a wood trim, use a cup holder with tooth brush holder. 14. Discussed the shower. It was confirmed at this meeting that Chris Bassett has determined that the new showers recently ordered shall have a shower head located on the front end of the shower with the mixing valve located below,the shower to come with a shower rod, grab bars to be located in the shower and have a fold-down seat. 15. Mary Lou asked what appliances were included. DHDA showed her the schedule in Division 14 for her use. However,since the laundry was added,the washer and dryers were not included. Construction Phase 1. Owner's Concerns: A. We asked the administrator whether there has been any interference with the operations. She stated that she is anxious to get the project completed at the earliest time and that she had no specific issues at this time. She explained that she would like the main entrance and offices back as soon as possible. This is an issue as plumbing for the bathrooms above needs to be installed and it will take some time. Al indicated that he thought in about two weeks he could turn over some of the area. B. Administrator indicated that there is a new maintenance supervisor who will interface with Al Deluca so that the facility can understand the time table for completion of various components of the project: 2. We reviewed with Paul and Jim Goulet that windows installed were only taped in place and that the detail calls for flashing,which is a peel and stick which should go across the top and down the jambs. This needs to be provided on all windows except for the bays which would only get it at the jambs. 3. We discussed that the ductwork has not been coordinated with the plumbing and there appear to be a number of areas where these issues are reducing the ceiling heights or causing soffits to be constructed. We refer you to the General Conditions which require the GC to coordinate the installation of the various building systems. 4. DHDA walked through with super to discuss a variety of construction issues: A. Relocation of staff toilet room on 2nd and 3rd floors. B. Difference in elevation of the existing building with the new addition. C. Discussed the duct coming up from the kitchen. D. Reviewed temporary kitchen hood ductwork. 5. Bob Griffiths of Hall Engineering did a walk-thru of the building with me. He arrived after the meeting. He will be sending his report. Next job meeting is scheduled for October 23, 2008. If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise, this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. i October 30,2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow Stan,SS Design Tony Papantonis Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Al Deluca David Dunlap Purpose: Review HCP ramp provided by SS Design and the progress of the project. a ' Walk-thru 1. Vinyl siding on the rear of the building is approximately 95%.complete. 2. Only one person working in the WWTP. 3. Some sitework being performed outside of the plant. 4. Some of the fiberglass shower units. 5. Basement entrance mechanical and plumbing lines have not been installed to maintain a 7-6" minimum ceiling height. Ducts at the entrance door measure 7'- 1" and 7-2" in other areas. November 13, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Chris Bassett Jon Truslow Al Deluca Paul Jon Teixeira David Dunlap Purposes: Review the.project completion and to bring Chris up-to-date with the various aspects of the project. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: A. Completion date: 2/6/09. When discussed the PM stated that they are updating their schedule for the project and will issue it before the next meeting. Jon wanted to get feedback on a couple of deliveries before issuing the`revised schedule. B. WWTP Update: 1. Percent complete: Not much work has been done on the plants since the pieces of equipment that were missed.when the truck was unload and the bill of lading was providing to the engineer. Jon advised that they have several pieces of equipment that was missing on-site;however, there is a piece of equipment which is , back ordered and there is no delivery date on it. Since time is of the essences we need to get an answer on when the equipment will be on-site. 2. Some work has been completed outside the plant. Disccusssed if we could install the equipment pad at the rear of the site, which has been an ongoing question for some weeks now. Stan advised the � GC that it could not be done and that the paving has to be done first; then the paving modified and the slab poured. These appears to be counter-productive but this is the site engineer's call. 3. Has the force main been installed? GC advised that it has been i brought to the top of the hill. They are considering paving the service drive since this work has been completed. Now that the force main is up to the leaching fields. Does this mean the work on the leaching fields can commence. GC assumed so. 4. It was noted that there were no workmen work on the plant or the fields. C. Job Super's Look Adhead: Al provided those in attendance with the look ahead. See attached: 2. Shop drawings; A. Expansion joint: DHDA requested an additional copy of the expansion joint submission be provided. B. Toilet room accessories were returned by DHDA. D. Signage: Waiting for Anne to pick a color. E. Fire alarm submission: The engineer has returned this submission with comments on a several occasions. The subcontractor is not providing the appropriate information so that this can be approved and material ordered. Michael Zax requested that a fire alarm contractor be on-site with the wiring contractor to discuss the submission and installation of same. 3. First Floor Terrace: A. GC advised that the trench drain been installed and waterproofed. B. After the meeting we saw water still ponding from the rain on the deck. C. The pad for the membrane is on-site but has not been installed. D. DHDA advised that the two new columns shall have a steel plate that set on the slab that is presently poured and then a pitch pocket installed so that the entire base of the column can be waterproofed. Waiting for the structural engineer to advise on how to attach column. , E. Now that the membrane has been installed, our office recommends that the area be flooded, stand for 24 hours and then drained. F. J. Texiera advised that he is working with the deck mfg. who has come up with a cost for a 2-color deck with exposed aggregate. The cost is in the area of$37,000. G. Chris asked if they had a cost on the pergola. We were advised by the PM that they do not but will have the estimate by the next job meeting. 4. Chris is anxious to get this work ordered and underway as she is pre-marketing the facility, which is extremely important. The following was requested for pre- marketing: A. The main entrance of the facility needs to be utilized so that families considering placing their loved ones in the facility. In order to do this: 1. Carpet replaced in the main entrance through to the elevator lobby. Since the reception area, conference room and some offices were turned over to the facility, it will assist the administrative staff getting back in their offices. 2. There is a request that the reception desk be manufactured and installed to help show the ambiance of the assisted living.' 3. Install the cross-corridor doors into the assisted living,but remain shut under the construction phase has been completed. B. Would like the mansard over the existing canopy roof to be completed so it looks like a finished product. 5. Status: A. There is only one more fiberglass shower enclosure to be delivered. Those on site are in the process of being installed. During the walk-thru it was observed that the grab bars and seats were,not installed at the factory and are being done on-site which often times causes maintenance problems at a later date. GC is responsible to see that the locking is adequate attached so that the grab bars can meet code requirement of holding up 250 lbs/lin. ft. and that the fold-down seat will be adequately supported as well and not leak. B. HVAC and plumbing outside lower elevator entrance: We asked if they have been installed to meet code. During walk-thru we saw ducts that were at T-1". Once the ceiling is installed they will be even lower. At the last meeting J. Teixiera indicated that they issued a directive to the subcontractors that ceiling is to be 7-6 in the lower area and that all building systems will be located hire than this so that the parking will be open and clear. C. They indicated that he is needed in the outdoor storage. An electric unit heater will be added. 6. The existing building central dining room will be ready for use on Thanksgiving day for dinners.A. Deluca confirmed this. 7. ASI: #54: 1"Floor Terrace,.dated 11/4/08,WSK15 and WSK16, rev. 11/10/08 #55: Type of dishwasher, 11/10/08 #56: Fire Alarm: Electrical engineer is concerned about the fact that the subcontractor is not complying with the construction documents. He wants to meet him on-site to discuss this. Fire alarm is a key life safety ingredient to this project so it must be coordinated and installed per code. 8. PCO: A. #31: DHDA recommended approval. B. #41: backflow preventor, requirement of water dept. C. #42: cost rejected. Construction Phase 1. J. Truslow stated that there has not been any interference with the ongoing operations. 2. DHDA explained that there appears to be too much parking on-site. It was my understanding that the church next door was going to going to be utilized so that this will alleviate the parking and access around. 3. DHDA was instructed by Chris Bassett to attend the weekly meetings. DHDA will rearrange his schedule to accommodate Radius. Next meeting is scheduled for 11/20/08. DHDA cannot attend this as he will be attending Build Boston to obtain continuing education credit to maintain his 17 Architectural professional licenses. DHDA could make be available on Friday, November 21st if this is practical for the others who attend. If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please advise this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise,this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. December 4,2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Al Deluca Paul Connors David Dunlap Purpose: Review the progress of the project and to review the pencil requisition. Temperature: 42 degrees, sun Walk-Thru 1. It was report that the sheet rock is not being installed due to the fact that the town will not let the GC proceed because they believe the envelope is not weather-tight at this time. 2. Showers have been installed on the 1" and 2nd floors. However, shower seats have not been installed on the non-HCP showers. They are installed on the HCP showers. 3. Sprinkler mains were being installed. 4. Corridor partitions have been installed in the basement area. Doors and completion of the partitions remain. 5. A number of ducts continue to be located below 7-6". This is an issue the GC had set with his subcontractors. 6. Patching of concrete plank for the 1s' floor where an opening was installed below is not consistent with the structural engineers recommendation for this work. It is our understanding that saddles were supposed to be utilized and then the opening was supposed to be in-filled with rebar, which are to be tied into the plank that run parallel with it. 7. Laundry exhaust has been extended up through the roof. It is.our understanding J that the laundry is working. 8. Gyperete has been installed on the 1"floor precast slab. 9. No work was being performed at the main entrance. This area needs to be turned over to the owner for marketing. 10. Protection membrane has been laid over the new terrace waterproofing. Deck has not been poured yet. Owner has not advised on how to proceed. 11. Sitework: A. No work being done on the WWTP. It is DHDA's understanding that no work has been done since DHDA was at the site two weeks ago. Evidently, a part has not been delivered for installed. B. Loam was being screened. DHDA questioned at the meeting why all of the material is not placed in front of the living room area as a substantial amount of material is required and only the top 6" need to be screened loam. This has been discussed on a number of occasions. Be advised that the owner is not paying for additional fill in these areas. C. Base has been installed on the access drive. It will be paved the week of December 8th. DHDA advised that the entire site needs the paving completed. This was discussed months ago but the contractor refused to proceed with this work. Be advised that time is of the essence. The facility cannot go through the winter without the paving shown on the contract documents. We don't believe that an occupancy permit will be obtainable without the required parking spaces approved on the Special Permit. Plants normally close in December. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: A. Completion Date: Previously 2/6/09. GC advised that the completion date is now 2/27/09. It was discussed and pointed out that the project was originally scheduled to be completed at the beginning of January and. at each job meeting the date is being pushed back for a variety of reasons all of which are under the control and coordination of the GC. C. Bassett had directly advised the GC that time is of the essence and needs the project delivered in a timely fashion so she can pre-market and J hire staff necessary to run it. The ongoing delays are causing a financial hardship. What can be done to expedite the completion of the project. B. We had discussed that the sewage treatment plant was supposed to be tested November 151h for 7-10 days. The plant presently is not operable. All of the materials are not on-site nor is any work being done on it. It was reported that no work has taken place for two weeks on it. It should be noted that the construction of the leaching fields has not commenced yet. See SS Design's recommendations for installation of the entire sewage system dated October 27, 2008. Phase I has not commenced as of December 41h. We were advised that the leaching fields will be completed by December 191h C. Job super provided those in attendance with the look ahead. If you compare this look ahead with previous ones you will see the time line slipping for various component parts of the building. 2. Shop Drawings: A. Returned: transfer switches _approved as noted B. Fire Alarm: It was reported that the local fire department did not acceptable the narrative for the system. J. Teixeira indicated that this is correct. He has spoken with the fire alarm company who is redoing the , narrative and it will be filed with the fire department on December 91h. This needs to be followed up as it is a life safety component part that needs to be approved and installed with the contract drawings and the recommendations by the fire department. 3. PCO: A. Discussed outstanding PCOs. J. Truslow to check with the owner. B. Discussed the PCO"for the pergola for the terrace area. DHDA advised that the PCO is incomplete,that the intent is to provide entire work shown on ASI#54 dated 11/4/08. Among other things,the following is not included: 1. The screens are custom made. The onlyrevision would be that t the . bottom of the screens would be located at 2' off the deck. This reduces the size of the screens. This would be typical throughout. 2. The pressure-treated blocking across the top of the screens is continuous for attaching as needed. 3. Across the bottom there should be 4 sets of blocks, one at each end and two at the 3`d points. 4. Blocking to be flashed. 5. Clarification: Openings between the strapping of the screens is a 4 x 4 opening. Screens should be made of one piece. Blocking to be securely anchored to the structural studs. C. PCO#48:J. Truslow to check with interior designer on Item 00004 apartments can be omitted. D. TCO#47 was approved. E. PCO#43: Removal/replacement unsuitable soil -GC to follow up with owner. 4. RFI: A. Waiting for size and location of dumpster pads from SS Design. 5. Requisition: We review pencil requisition#15. It was found to need revisions in a number of areas: a. drywall, metal studs reduced to 35% b. fire extinguisher and cabinets reduced from 100%to 50% C. fire protection reduced from 65%to 50% d. HVAC reduced from 87%to 85% e. electrical secondary service from$13,300 to $5,000 f. CO#4 reduced from$40,000 to $30,000 g. CO#6 reduced from$48,000 t0 $30,000 h. fire alarm reduced from 75%to 65% 6. DHDA provided a proposed design solution for the ramp and connecting the bottom of the ramp to the HCP parking spaces on the opposite side of the driveway. This plan is different than SS Design's scheme which shows a 5' ramp and 5' walkway which protrudes into the existing drive that approaches the main entrance. It appears by the information provided to us by SS Design that utilizing 10' off of the building for ramps and walks would not allow for a 22' driveway pass to the main entrance. N We requested additional information from SSDesig n relative to proposed contours for this work and dimensional information relative to the drives. We have received limited information on the contours around the new addition. This needs to be resolves ASAP due to the phase of the project. 7. Discussed that when revision#4 went to the GC on Drawing S-4. It was confirmed that the GC received a response to an RFI issued on 9/16/08 relative to the sizing of the plank angle support. 8. Discussed the lack of work in the WWTP. GC confirmed that have been trying to get the site contractor to proceed. 9. The new detention area required by the conservation commission is extremely close to the service drive. It drops off steeply. This should be reviewed by the site engineer to see if it needs a guard rail for this area. The driveway had not been staked out so it was hard to ascertain the edge of the paving but by viewing it, it appears extremely close. We noted that the bollards called for in this area have not been installed either. Job super stated that he was going to install these after the paving which.is not the most desirable as the paving will have to be patched. 10. Care should be taken to stabilize the embankment as it was only graded last week. We anticipate that if it is not stabilized, it will erode over the winter months and require patching in the spring. Engineer shold advise. 11. DHDA confirmed the job meeting dates for the holidays with those in attendance. All could attend. Tuesday December 23`d at 9:30 am Tuesday December 301h at 9:30 am If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise, this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David 14. Dunlap Associates, Inc. r 1 k .. December 11,2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Al Deluca Paul Connors Stan, SS Design David Dunlap Purpose: Review progress of project. Weather: light rain,40 degrees Construction Administration 1. Project Schcedule: A. Completion Date Clarification: GC maintains that the project will be completed 2/27/09 but indicated that decisions on the terrace need to be made in expeditious manner. B. WWTP: Completion continues to be delayed. Workmen were scheduled to be on-site today;however,none were observed during the walk-thru. There was an issue with missing parts. GC assumed that they had been obtained and that is why workers were scheduled for today. Completion date is now scheduled for 12/7/08 and operations (30) days later... C. Sitework: 1. Status of the 3rd leaching field: excavated to the bottom and waiting for inspection. We were advised that SS Design has been on-site and is reviewing installation of the leaching fields. It was confirmed that double-washed stone will be utilized and that off- site material will be brought on. In speaking with Stan, it is our understanding material as it comes on-site. We advised Stan that we need a letter from his company regarding inspection of materials brought on site and the work to construct the fields on a regular basis, every two weeks, as the building inspector requires controlled construction. Stan stated he would do this. 2. It was confirmed that the pressure main coming up the entrance drive is in place and tested. 3. Service entrance drive has been paved including (5) additional spaces relocated to the main lot. 4. , We asked when paving will be completed since it is December 11"' and the plants close sometime this month. There is a substantial amount of paving to be completed. D. SS Design: ' 1. We reviewed the information needed to complete the design for the HCP ramp and access walk to the HCP spaces. Since SS Design is a site design engineer, we need all of the information relative to grades, drainage, construction details, foundation for the wall, etc. Job super indicated that they cannot build it with the information presently on the drawing. Discussed that the footings need to be at least a min. of 4' below grade. If the elevations'of the grade is not given the GC stated they cannot proceed. 2.. Detention area at the back of the building is problematic. It was graded. The retaining wall and guard rail were not installed and now the paving installed is extremely close to the area. It appears that the detention area will have to be re-graded; certainly the wall needs to be constructed. 3. During our walk-thru, SS Design found that the paving was only 15' wide where it abuts the sewage treatment building. Perhaps when re-grading the detention area they can move the area over so they can make it.wider, perhaps 18-19'. Stan stated he looked at it and will provide the GC with instructions on how to proceed. 2. job super provided those in attendance with the look ahead. 3. Shop Drawings: A. We reviewed the cabinet work at the country kitchen island. It was determined'that the way the contractor is showing how the cabinets will be constructed for this purpose is acceptable. The cabinet work contractor was referred to previous shop drawings showing how the bar counter gets supported off this millwork. He also indicated that the supports that he showed were short and need to match the construction detail on the drawings. See Detail 3/A10. The portion of the island that supports the 1 granite counter has an apron that covers the ends of the braces. The brace needs to be made from Cherry to match the counter. The shops that were made by Shephardville Construction LLC were approved as corrected and can proceed into fabrication. P B. Discussed the millwork shop drawings. Everything needs to be field- verified - � g Y g d verified before fabrication. Once the sheet rock is installed this can take place. Millwork for the reception desk is required to be expedited so it can be place while marketing is taking place. GC to provide a schedule. 4. GC to provide schedule on the new reception area to be used for pre-marketing. GC commited to completing this work by 1/2/09. 5. ASI: A. #54: Shows an update on the pergola design. GC requested the status of PCO on this. B. #58: Electrical engineer responded to the questions in this ASI. 6. PCO: A. J. Teixeira reviewed the log and we discussed the outstanding PCOs. J. Truslow requested that the terrace finished slab be separated from the millwork in order to expedite the installation of the slab. 7. RFI: A. Waiting for SS Design to provide location of the duinpster pad at the service entrance. We discussed in detail,but are still waiting for sketch.. 8. Requisition: DHDA signed and forward this on 12/10/08. 9. Discussed that Value Engineering took off the EIFS fascia and a similar fascia was installed. Three (3) fascias were submitted by the sub. We selected one and returned it. J. Teixeira needs help in getting the sub to proceed with the work. 10. Next job meeting is scheduled for 12/18/08. Walk-Thru 1. Drywall was being delivered to the site and passed through the existing windows on the various floors. 2. A number of drywallers were on-site erecting the drywall on the 1" floor. It was being stocked in the corridors for erection. We questioned that there were 22 sheets stacked in one area. This loading needs to be checked with the structural engineer. 3. It appeared that 90% showers for the apartments were installed. 4. The screening of top soil was completed and stockpiled on-site in a location that blocks the view of the main entrance. 5. We checked with the job super to make sure that the tarp over the patio area does not block the drains so that due to the substantial amount of rain being experienced will be able to drain off the roof. 6. Ceiling has not been installed at the basement area entrance. 7. Bollards have been installed at the sewage treatment plant. 8. Driveway around the plant is so tight that it does not appear that the containers from the trash compactor can be removed/set-in-place. 9. It appears that no work is being done around the perimeter where the parking spaces are. If the base does not get installed in the next two weeks,the plants will more than likely be closed and the facility will have a lack of parking through the remainder of the winter. 10. It was noted that in the country kitchen the window sill and the counter now line up. This means that the back splash will have to be eliminated at this area and the counter top caulked and then the window sill installed above it. 11. The 2-hour shaft wall for the kitchen hood duct has not been completed. If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise, this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H: Dunlap Associates, Inc. David W. Oaaeap oiddociated, Sac. ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-PLANNERS 105 Webster Street, Units 1 &2 Hanover, MA 02339 (781)878-0066 FAX(781)878-7060 E-mail:david@dhdunlap.com June 19, 2008 Mr. Thomas Perry. Director Building Division n / Town Hall C�/�' �( 367 Main Street Hyannis,MA 02601 Re: Cape Regency Assisted Living Dear Mr. Perry: Our office has compiled field reports from job meetings being held on a continuing basis at Cape Regency under Permit#B 20073078. This information is being provided to you for your records as required under controlled construction, Section 116.2.1 of the MSB, 780 CMR 6th Edition. Attached hereto are field reports for May 16 - 12, 2008. Per your request, attached hereto please find the testing reports for your information. Sincerely yours, VID H. DUNLAP ASSOCIATES, IN at d " 4- David H. Dunlap,Jr.,NCARB, ARA President I yam'.}{ t ..•.r;e 3T2 .Eh JI-i Ltd .rid iY6i.yJ.; . May 30, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Al Deluca Stan, SS Design David Dunlap Purpose: Review progress of construction. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: We were advised at the last meeting that there would be a month delay due to a variety of reasons. We explained the need to maintain the completion date. At this meeting we received a new construction schedule, which indicated that the project will be completed January 2, 2009 which is approximately 1 week late. We appreciate the review and re-analysis of the schedule so that we get the project completed in a timely fashion. 2. It was confirmed that steel will be arriving on June 2nd, with erection starting on the 3rd. 3. Facility's Concerns:At the last job meeting Danielle Breault and Mike Berendsen expressed their concerns relative to the construction phase. Nauset has reported back the following: A. .Site lighting being inoperable: This has been reviewed and repaired by the electrician. The site lighting is operable. B. Ruts in paving and dirt in temporary parking: Nauset has patched the ' driveway and filled in the ruts. C. Existing lights on building are inoperable. No update at this time. This needs to be reviewed again. D. Flooding of administrator's office: The roofer has made the roof weather- tight; there should be no further problems. E. Job super meeting with administrator in the morning:The administratorwas not available due to other commitments but it was reported that super has met with Michael Berendsen to keep him up-to- date. The facility needs an updated schedule and requires 72 hr. notification before the phases that disrupt them are undertaken. 5. Temporary partitions are in place inside the building,which is primarily to allow for the structural steel pockets to be cut in the exterior bearing wall. 6. Status of the facility emptying areas of the basement to the construction phase can work in these areas. It was agreed that Nauset will construct the (4) spaces recently added to the wetlands side of the access driveway so that the owner can place a container in this area. Nauset has not done this yet. 7. Status of attic stock Phase I: Jon Teixeira reported that the ACT has been ordered. The ACT for Cape Heritage will be delivered to this site. Jon was not aware of the other attic stock required. We asked him to follow up and then advise us. The facility should VCT, carpet, paint and other finishes used in the building for their use. 8. Status of Cape Heritage attic stock revolves around the ACT.. This needs to be revisited. 9. Site Engineering: A. We were advised that we were going to be receiving shop drawings for the grates, ladder, etc. It was pointed out that the drawings call for a metal grate with metal stairs, etc. Engineer to see that this is what is utilized. B. Evidently the as-built foundation plan has not been completed. It was reported that measurements have been taken. Copies need,to go to the town, J. Truslow, D. Dunlap and Stan. 10. PCO: A. #10 ACT: This was revised. B. Outdoor Patio: this was approved and signed. 11. ASI: A. #16: Revision to sinks in granite counters in the country kitchen was issued. B. #17: Dwg. A-7 was revised relative to HCP water closets. We discussed and Jon Teixeira is to get a cost to increase showers to 5'. This was a clarification made by DHDA. It indicates that all showers will be 4' except in HCP bathrooms where they will be 5'. If there is a change to this, we have no record of this. 12. Job super's look ahead was provided. 13. Testing: DHDA continues to receive testing results. 14. Requisition: It was reviewed and once corrections are made it can be approved. 15. The nurse call manufacturers need to be interviewed. Construction Phase 1. Concrete Pour: Except for the slabs, approx. 90% is in place. 2. Underground Plumbing: The 1st floor plumbing is being installed; once done it will be backfilled and then the slab on grade will be poured. This will be a great area to erect the addition off of. 3. We did not have a chance to review the sediment control barrier. 4. Contractor requested additional information on the HVAC and plumbing for the new laundry areas. If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise, this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr., NCARB, ARA President 4 . May 22, 2008 CAPE REGENCY FIELD REPORT People Present: Danielle Breault Michael Berendsen Jon Truslow Jon Teixeira Al Deluca David Dunlap Weather: 56, clear Purpose: Review progress of project. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: When asked if the project was on schedule, we were advised that the completion date of 12/26/08 had slipped and we received a new project schedule which indicates approximately a 1 month delay. An in-depth discussion took place and we were advised that there were approximately (7) rain days and that Nauset was advised that the structural steel installation would slip due to a variety of reasons. We advised that this is unacceptable and they need to find out how to bring the project back in line,by either reducing the time it takes to install the steel or some other phase of the construction as the owner has there plans set on this completion date for marketing, hiring employees, etc. This would cause a substantial financial hardship to the facility. Nauset stated that they would revisit this and get back to us at the next meeting. 2. The facility's staff were in attendance as there are number of issues need to be resolved so as to coordinate the operations with the construction which has been slipping as of late: A. The site lighting has gone out on a number of occasions and is causing a safety issue for the staff and visitors at night. The administrator advised that this creates an unsafe condition for her staff coming and leaving a shift change. With all of the disruption relative to construction there are hazardous conditions if you cannot see where you are walking. B. There are a number of areas where the black top has ruts that cars have trouble driving over. Even the earth where some parking is taking place is uneven and damaged causing a problem for staff and visitors. The job super and administrator will walk the site to define these areas and corrective steps will be taken immediately. C. Existing lights on the building that were operable are now not functioning. This needs to be corrected. D. The administrative area is being flooded due to leakage from the roof. The facility understands that there are temporary patches but the problem is that the leaking is continuous and there is a concern about damage to the interior and mildew issues that could arise. E. Construction Sequence: The facility is not always aware of what is happening especially inside the facility. They need to understand this so it can be taken into consideration when planning the operation activities. It was agreed that the job super will meet early in the morning with the administrator a minimum of twice per week. 3. Nauset requires areas of the building to be empty so that they can complete their work. This means that existing storage and records need to be moved and stored . in another location. Since the facility is tight for storage, outside containers were discussed. It was discussed in depth and it was agreed that the additional (4) spaces to be created on the site will be graded and gravel will be installed. This area will be used to locate the owner's trailer. This wont have to be moved until the final paving is to be done. 4. Facility indicated that they did not receive attic stock from Phase 1. Evidently, they have taken attic stock from Cape Heritage to replace the damaged ceiling file in a number of areas where the roof has leaked. This means that not only does Cape Heritage need the file replaced, but this facility needs the attic stock from Phase 1. 5. The facility asked about the patio construction. DPH will be surveying within the next(30) days and this is a concern that they had previously. A PCO was developed by Nauset,but the cost appeared excessive. Nauset is to revisit the number. 6. Nauset requested a fire extinguisher layout inside the assisted living. 7. Site Engineering: A. No additional shop drawings have been provided on the plant. A. Returned: 1. elevator color selection 2. American Olean Vallano Tile 3. Dal Tile quarry tile 4. Armstrong Safeguard Spa 5. Johnson stair treads, nosings, risers & stringers 6. USG DX/DL fire-rated grid 7. USG centricitee fire-rated grid 8. Armstrong Dune beveled tegular B. Status: 1. Stairs: I spoke with company, revised drawings are in route. 2. A meeting needs to be set to select the nurse call. 4. PCO: A. Received a PCO on the new patio cost was excessive; GC to review. B. Received PCO for relocating sprinkler heads as required by the fire department. PCO was approved. C. Received PCO on ACT to make it fire-rated. 5. Testing: DHDA stated he has received the latest test results from UTS and have sent them to the building inspector along with the field reports to date. Construction Phase 1. Based on the information stated above, we hope to resolve the issues the facility has raised. It appears that if we follow-up on the resolution we will be back on track. I believe that the super meeting with the administrator will be a conduit that will allow the facility to understand the construction sequence as well. 2. . Jon Truslow indicated that the site engineer will be at the next meeting to review the requisition. It will be Jon Teixeira's responsibility to have the requisition for this meeting. 3. Contractor indicated that the steel will be delivered June 6th which is substantially later than originally scheduled. We asked if the erection of steel could be expedited so time could be picked up. • 4. DHDA to provide a revised sketch for the typical apartment bathrooms based on the fact that the water closets are HCP type. 5. Work in progress during this site visit: A. Filling the void inside the new addition. B. Roof: 1. Forming the beams that need to be poured. 2. Patching roof to make it weather. 3. HVAC contractor was on the roof looking at the RTU to be disconnected and removed so that the new columns can come through the plank to the roof. C. Masons were working on the exterior walls of the WWTP. D. Coring for underground plumbing. 6. I pointed out to the super that there is an area where there is break out on the soil erosion barriers. He stated he would take care of it. It was reported to have been caused by the fire department testing fire hoses from the building. Next meeting is scheduled for May 29, 2008. If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing within ten days receipt; otherwise, this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. 9; Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People'- -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/19/2008 Report No. 8 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete CO. Lawrence Ready Mix ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/411 No Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS 21 SET 1 LOCATION: Elevator walls & interior footings, column line 7 at E Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture No. (in:) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested Days (lbs.). (psi;) Air Temp.(F.) 60 Type Conc Temp(F) 70 B375 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 05/27/2008 8 39,000 3,110 2 B376 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 06/02/2008 14 50,000 3,980 2 Truck No. 2.91 B377 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 06/16/2008 as Ticket No. 1776E B378 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 06/16/2008 28 Time 2:15 B379 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 06/16/2008 zs Unit Wtlbs/cu ft Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours ; Time J. Grocer No REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES (1) Cone (2) Cone and Split (3) Cone and Shear 4 ( ) Shear (5)Columnar Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/19/2008 Report No. 8 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete CO. Lawrence Ready Mix FIELD SUMMARY REPORT 'Total Pour: Elevator walls, basement level; interior footings, column line 7 at D, 8 at D, 9 at D, 7 at E, 8 at E, 9 at E Method of Placement: ID E]Chute Discharge E] Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑ Truck Discharge Chute ® End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ❑ Thermal-Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer © Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ❑X None ❑ Other Slump Specification (in.) '3-5 Number of slumps out of specifidation reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: f R• Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/19/2008 Report No. 8 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Ready Mix ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/4 No Of Sets 1 CUBIC YARDS 21 SET 1 LOCATION: Elevator walls & interior footings, column line 7 at E Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp.(F.) 60 No, (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested Days (Ibs.) (psi.) Type Conc Temp(F) 70 B375 4 x 8 12.56 Good OS/19/2008 05/27/2008 8 39,000 3,110 2 B376 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 06/02/2008 14 50,000 3,980 2 Truck No. 291 B377 4 x 8. 12.56 Good O5/19/2008 06/16/2008 28 66,000 5,250 1 Ticket No. 17768 B378 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 06/16/2008 28 64,000 5,100 2 Time 2:15 B379 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 06/16/2008 28 63,000 5,020 4 Unit Wtlbs/cu ft Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES - f'J i I r• (1) Cone (2)Cone and Split (3)Cone and Shear (4) Shear (5)•Columnar fur reports are available in PDF ,form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs- Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn': John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan.Szczurko -Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing ReopW } Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/19/2008 Report No. 8 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. .Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete CO. Lawrence Ready Mix FIELD SUMMARY REPORT `TOtalPour: Elevator walls, basement level; interior footings, column line 7 at D, 8 at D, 9 at D, 7 at E, 8 at E, 9 at E Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge Bucket ❑ Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑ Truck Discharge Chute ® End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ❑ Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer ® Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ® None ❑ Other Slump Specification (in.) 3-5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: 9• Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing PeapW -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/19/2008 Report No. 8 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap _ Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Ready Mix ALL.FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-3- 1 C-143 C-1064 .ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE .ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/4 11No Of Sets 1 CUBIC YARDS 21 SET 1 LOCATION: Elevator walls & interior footings, column line 7 at E Total Unit Lab Size Area Slump(.in.) 4 Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp. (F.) 60 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested Days ,:,,,:(I (psi.) Type B375 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 OS/27/2008 8 39,000 F 3,110 z Conc Temp(F) 70 B376 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 06/02/2008 14'� y": Truck No. 291 B377 4 x 8 12.56 Good OS/19/2008 06/16/2008 28 Ticket No. L:l B378 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 06/16/2008 28 Time B379 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/19/2008 06/16/2008 28 Unit Wtlbs/cAir Content GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES { { (1) Cone (2) Cone and Split (3) Cone and Shear (4) Shear (5) Columnar )ur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. ,cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko L Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/19/2008 Report No. 8 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 . Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete CO. Lawrence Ready Mix FIELD SUMMARY REPORT `Total Pour: Elevator walls, basement level; interior footings, column Brie 7 at D. 8 at D; 9 at-D, 7 at E, 8 at E, 9 at E Method of Placement: ❑X Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ❑X Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑ Truck Discharge Chute © End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ❑ Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer ❑X Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ❑X None ❑ Other Slump Specification (in.) 3-5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: Of Massac husetts The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/27/2008 Report No. 9 " David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete CO. Lawrence Ready Mix ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/4 11 No. Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 8 SET 1 LOCATION: Piers D7, D8, D9, E7, E8, E9 Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 AN - Area Date Date Age, Load Load Fracture (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested. . Days (Ibs, Air Temp. (F.) 65 8 12.56 Good OS/27/2008 06/03/2008 7 38,000 3(030 T2peConc Temp(F) 72 8 12.56 Good 05/27/2008 06/10/2008 14 Truck No. 297 8 12.56 Good_ OS/27/2008 06/24/2008 2g TlCket NO. 20694 8 12.56 Good OS/27/2008 06/24/2008 2g Time 2:00 12.56 Good OS/27/2008 06/24/2008 28 Unit Wtlbs/cu ft Air Content(%) 3ENERALREMARKS: Inspector Premium ;Tra%i;el - vVameTime Hours 7. GrocerMax Day+0,5 Hrs CT ZEVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES 1 I A / II II 1 l (1)Cone (2) Cone and Split (3)Cone and Shear (4) Shear (5)Columnar ur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Cc: Radius Management Svcs: Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko q. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/27/2008 Report No. 9 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Ready Mix FIELD SUMMARY REPORT 'Total Pour: Interior piers, D7, D8, D9, E7, E8, E9 Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge Bucket ❑ ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ❑X Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑ Truck Discharge Chute © End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ❑ Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer ❑X Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat. None ❑ Other Slump Specification (in.) 3-5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected 4pproved by temarks: o• Of-Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing,PeopW -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/27/2008 Report No. 9 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number . 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Ready Mix ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 r4LL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 40004 3/411 INo: Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 8 SET 1 LOCATION: Piers D7, D8, D9, E7, E8, E9 Lab Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 Size Area Date Date 'Age Load, Load Fracture' Air Temp. (F.) 65 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested Da C511 4 x s ys (lbs.,) (psi.) Type Conc Temp(F) 72 12.56 Good 05/27/2008 06/03/2008 7 38,000 3,030 2 C512 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/27/2008 06/10/2008 14 48,000 3,820 4 Truck No. 297 C513 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/27/2008 06/24/2008 2g Ticket No. 20694 C514 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/27/2008 06/24/2008 28 Time 2:00 C515 4 x 8 12.56 Good OS/27/2008 06/24/2008 28 Unit Wt Ibs/cu ft Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Name Premium Travel Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day+0.5 Hrs OT 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES Ir j Ii (1) Cone an lit (3)Cone and Shear (4)Shear (5)Columnar ur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko 9' Of-Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/27/2008 Report No. 9 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105. Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Ready Mix FIELD SUMMARY REPORT Total Pour: Interior piers, D7, D8, D9, E7, E8, E9 Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge Bucket Other: ❑ ❑Other Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑ Truck Discharge Chute' ®-End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: []Curing Box ❑ Thermal Blanket Ha /Straw ❑ Y ❑ Trailer © Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ® None � Other Slump Specification(in.) 3-5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: Of-Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Grout Report Date 05/30/2008 Report No. 1 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervill 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Cape Cod ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-476 C-1019 C-1064 C-143 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 C-617 CLASS GROUT: 3000# Wall Fill No Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS 5 SET 1 LOCATION: Column line A-C at 1.6-2, high lift, waste water treatment plant Total Unit Slump(in.) 9 Lab Size Area Date Date Age . Load Load, Air Temp(F.) 66 No. (in.) (sq.in.) 'Condition Cast Tested Days (lbs.) (psi.) Grout Temp(F.) 70 E311 3 x 3 x 6 9.00 Good 05/30/2008 06/06/2008 7 16,500 1,830 E312 3 x 3 x 6 9.00 Good 05/30/2008 06/27/2008 28 Truck No. 54 E313 3 x 3 x 6 9.00 Good OS/30/2008 06/27/2008 E28Ticket No. 10675 E314 3 x 3 x 6 9.00 Good OS/30/2008 06/27/2008 g Tlme 12:35 GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time Tony Robinson No REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Grout Placement Summary Report Report Date 05/30/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor < Nauset Construction Grout Placement Strength (lbs.): ❑ 2,000 ❑ 2,500 ❑ 3,500 ❑ 4,000 0 Other: 3,000 Lift: ❑ High ❑ Low ❑ Other: Method: ❑X Pump ❑ Manual ❑ Vibrated ❑ Puddled ❑ Other: Type: ❑ Wall ❑ Pier ❑ Column ❑ Other: Cleanouts Present: 0 Yes ❑ No Location Floor Level: waste water treatment plant Room No.: Column Lines: Column line A-C at 1.6-2 Other: Bond Beams Location: ❑ Bed Cours ❑ Intermediate(Course) 0 Top Of Masonary' ❑ Head ❑ Sill ❑ Other: Reinforcement: ❑ Single ❑X Double ❑ Other: Size Rebar: #4 Vertical Wall Reinforcement Bar Size(#): ❑ 4 0 5 ❑ 6 ❑ 7 ❑ 8 ❑ 9 ❑ Other: Bar: ❑X Single ❑ Double Bar Positioners: ❑ Yes 0 No ipacing: ❑ 8" ❑ 16" ❑ 24" ❑ 32" ❑ 40" 48" El Other: ❑ -lorizontal Joint Reinforcement iorizontal joint 0 Yes ❑ No ,einforcement Vire#: 9 gauge Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) Grout Placement Summary Report Report Date 05/30/2008 Report No. 1 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Type: Q Truss ❑ Ladur ❑ Tri-Rod ❑ Hook and Eye ❑ Other: Spacing (o.c.) 16 Flashing Type: ❑ Lead Coated Copper _ ❑ E.P.D.M. Coated Copper Fabric ❑ Bituthene ❑ Other: Location: ❑ Thruwall ❑ Jamb ❑ Head. ❑ _Sill ❑ Slab ❑ Cap ❑ Other: GENERAL REMARKS: Fernandez Masonry ordered fresh grout to fill cells and bond beams courses. All walls contained the proper vertical and horizontal reinforcement necessary. One grout prism was fabricated for compressive strength tests. Inspector . Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time Tony Robinson No Min Day 3 Hr(s) ; REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reportsOutsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Att-n: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko I 4• } Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) Grout Placement Summary Report Report Date 06/03/2008 Report No. 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Grout Placement Strength (lbs.): ❑ 2,000 ❑ 2,500 ❑ 3,500 0 4,000 ❑ Other: Lift: ❑X High ❑ Low ❑ Other: Method: ❑X Pump ❑ Manual ❑ Vibrated ❑ Puddled ❑ Other: Type: © Wall ❑ Pier ❑ Column 0 Other: Stairwell Cleanouts Present: ❑ Yes No Location Floor Level: Stairwell Room No.: Column Lines: column line C-Cl at 5-6 Other: Bond Beams Location: ❑ Bed Cours ❑ Intermediate(Course) Q Top Of Masonary ❑ Head ❑ Sill ❑ Other: Reinforcement: ❑ Single ❑X Double ❑ Other: Size Rebar. #4 Vertical Wall Reinforcement 3ar Size(#): ❑ 4 ❑ 5 ❑ 6 ❑ 7 ❑ 8 ❑ 9 ❑ Other: 3ar: ❑X Single ❑ Double 3ar Positioners: ❑ Yes Q No ;pacing: ❑ 8„ . ❑ 16" 0 24" ❑ 32" ❑ 40" ❑ 48" ❑ Other: lorizontal Joint Reinforcement orizontal pint Q Yes ❑ No einforcement 'ire#: 9 gauge o• Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-43877755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Grout Placement Summary Report Report Date 06/03/2008 Report No. 2 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Type: ❑X Truss ❑ Ladur ❑ Tri-Rod ❑ Hook and Eye ❑ Other: Spacing (o.c.) 16 Flashing Type: ❑ Lead Coated Copper ❑ E.P.D.M. ❑ Coated Copper Fabric ❑ Bituthene ❑ Other:. Location: ❑ Thruwall ❑ Jamb ❑ Head ❑ Sill ❑ .Slab ❑ Cap ❑ Other: GENERAL REMARKS: Fernandez Masonry pumps fresh grout into CMU cells at stairwell. All cells were filled completely. Masons vibrated vertical bars to make grout fill completely. All walls contained the proper vertical and horizontal reinforcement specified. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Tony Robinson Time No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: William F. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. CC: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 05/23/2008 Report No. 31 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Sunny, 65 degrees ,TIME. 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork constructionn and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT. 4320c excavator, #624H loader, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum, Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction; ,l ocation (Feet) 1 6.2 132.6 130.3 98.3 See sketch -2.5' 2 6.0 132.E 130.5 98.4 " 3 6.0 132.6 130.8 98.6 '2.0' 4 6.4 132.61 131.7 99.3 OBSERVATIONS: Che purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as 'necessary. 'he following was observed:. 'he interior of the building was backfilled up to the plumbing pipe elevation with offsite gravel from A. Landers. After it was compacted four density tests'were performed using a sand cone in .ccordance with ASTM D1556. All test results exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM 11557 (98.0% is required when processed gravel is being used and 95% when onsite gravel is being used) . 'hese observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. ispector Premium Travel lame Time Hours Time . Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) EVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser ur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko �UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)181-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, In.c. Report Date 05/23/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 31 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment 05/127/2008 09:51 5087710835 _ NAUSET CONSTPUCTIN PAGE 05/ERA ^ur } s In c„ ~S! 0 a a p7 I n 3y j h ( ' aril to o w° ' m z z n o Jf: s~ } n �m Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 05/19/2008 Report No. 8 David Dunlap Associates, Inc , Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction CONTACT. Al Deluca TIME OF INSPECTION: 10 : 00 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 1 : 00 SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS: S1, S2 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: 3/10/0 8 SHOP DRAWING(S):Rl, R2 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES NO X 4REA REVIEWED: 'slevator wall, basement level; interior footings 7D, 8D, 9D, 7E, 8E, 9E ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED Yes No Coverage(Top x Bottom x and/or Inside Face x Outside Face x ) X Clearance X Cleanliness (heavy rust, scale, mud, dirt, oil,etc. not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing . X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying ; X The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. ENERAL REMARKS: All reinforcing steel was in place prior to concrete placement. ispector . Premium Travel ame Time Hours Time Grocer No IOf Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 05/19/2008 Report No. 8 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction .REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko q Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216,(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 05/27/2008 Report No. 9 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction CONTACT: Al Deluca .TIME OF INSPECTION: 8 : 00 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 1 :00 PM SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS: S1, S2 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: 3/10/08 SHOP DRAWING(S):Rl, R2 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES X NO 4REA REVIEWED: Interior piers, D7, D8, D9, E7, 28, E9 ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED. Yes No Coverage(Top x Bottom x and/or Inside Face x Outside Face x ) X Clearance ' X Cleanliness (heavy rust, scale, mud, dirt,oil,etc. not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying X The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. ENERAL REMARKS: All reinforcing steel was tied and in place prior to, concrete placement. ispector Premium Travel ame Time Hours Time Grocer No Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 05/27/2008- .Report No. 9 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn• David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 1.05 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction .REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree WT � Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko { Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) C.M.U. Mortar Summary Report Report Date 05/28/2008 Report No. 1 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Mortar Strength (psi.): ❑ O-350 ❑ N-750 ❑X S -1800 ❑ M-2500 ❑ Other: On Site Mix: Pre-Mix (brand): Masonry Cement(brand): Iron Clad Portland Admixture(s): Type: Type S Lime Brand: Type: . Brand: Pigment(s): Type: Brand: Dye Lot: Type: Brand: Dye Lot: Block Block Type: 0 Standard ❑ Glazed ❑ Split Faced ❑ Other: Block Size: ❑ 4" ❑ 6" ❑ 8" ❑ 10" ❑ 12" ❑ Other: Horizontal Joint Reinforcement Wire Size(#): 9 gauge Type: Q Truss ❑ Ladur ❑ Tri-Rod ❑ Hook and Eye y El Prefab"Ells" ❑ Prefab"Tees" ❑ Other: Spacing: ❑ 8" o.c. 16"o.c. ❑' 24"o.c. ❑ Other: Wall Ties: ❑ Adjustable ❑ Trap Triangle g El Corrugated ❑ ❑ Other: Flashing Material: Grace, Perma-barrier Location: 0 Thruwall ❑ -Base ❑ Sill ❑ Head ❑ Jamb ❑ Cap ❑ Other: Joints Type: ❑ Struck 0 Tooled ❑ Raked ❑ Other: GENERAL REMARKS: work area: A line nspector Premium Travel lame Time Hours Time Grocer No L II i Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing People- Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) C.M.U. Mortar Summary Repoli Report Date 05/28/2008 Report No. 1 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor _ Nauset Construction .REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDF form via email. ,Please email us.at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. CC: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn; John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko I_ Of-Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Concrete Field Report Report Date 05/28/2008 Report No. 6 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project. Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: .TIME: CONTACT: SUMMARY: Transported one set of cylinders cast on 5/27/08 to the lab for testing. GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time. R. Lopes No REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available -in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko l Of M-assachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Mortar Report Date 05/23/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Cen.tervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. onsite ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-1064 C-270 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-109- CLASS MORTAR: Type S 1800 psi No. Of Sets: 2 SET 1 LOCATION: Column line A at -2-2, course 1-5 Total Unit Air Temp.(F.) 58 [Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Mortar Temp(F) 60 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition ' Cast Tested Days �,.,(Ibs� (psi.) Time 7:30 C704 2 x 2 x 2 4.00 Good 05/23/2008 O5/30/2008 7 { 6,9:0$ 1,730 C705 2 x 2 x 2 4.00 Good 05/23/2008 06/20/2008 28 y�, C706 2 x 2 x 2 4.00 Good 05/23/2008 06/20/2008 28 SET 2 LOCATION: Column line A at -2-2, course 6-11 Total Unit Air Temp. (F.) 65 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Mortar Temp(F) 64 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested Days 1160 (psi.) Time 2:30 C710 2 x 2 x 2 4.00 Good 05/23/2008 05/30/2008 7 i 6,800 1,700 C711 2 x 2 x 2 4.00 Good 05/23/2008 06/20/2008 28 C712 2 x 2 x 2 4.00 Good 05/23/2008 06/20/2008 28 e GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada Dur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko 4 Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) SOII Inspection Report Report Date 05/22/2008 Report No. 30 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville � 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Partly cloudy, 63 degrees TIME: 9 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, #624H loader, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent No. Moisture Den Elevation sity Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 6.4 132.6 130.4 98.3 See sketch -5.0' 2 6.0 132.6 131.2 98,9 " -4.5' 3 6.0 132.6 132.1 99.6 " 4. ' 4 -G.3 132.6 130.0 98.0 " -4.0' 5 6.1 132.E 130.7 98.6 " 4.0' 6 5.8 132.6 131.4 99.1 " -3.5' 7 5.8 132.6 131.0 98.8 -3.5' OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary: The following was observed: The interior of the building continues to be backfilled. Offsite gravel from P. A. Landers was being used. Seven compaction tests were performed using a sand cone in accordance with ASTM D1556. All seven tests exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. (98.0% is required when arocessed gravel is being used and 95% when onsite gravel is being used) . these observations and test results were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time � Hours J. Grocer Time No Max Day - 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser ur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing ReopW Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 05/22/2008 Report No. 30 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. :r Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781.438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 05/22/2008 Attn: David Dun lap p Report No. 30 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339--1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment 05/23/2008 11:23 5087710835 NAUSET CONSTRUCTIN PAGE 1.,5/ -- ------__...--- o --r r �41, v J T 7 L. �. C N n �� ts l L� m p O f' � - �, 77 � � N f) n r- C I q Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) SOII Inspection Report Report Date 05/21/2008 Report No. 29 David Dunlap Associates, Inc , Job Number 11670 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Sunny, 67 degrees .TIME: 11 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, #624H loader, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location. 6.4 133.7 129.7 97.0 Elevation 1 See sketch -6.0' (Feet) 2 6.4 133.7 128.6 96.2 " 3 6.0 133.7 130.5 97.6 " -5.5' 4 6.0 133.7 128.1 95.8 " 5.0' 5 6.3 133.7 127.7 95.3: " OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field densitty tests as necessary. The following was observed: Phe interior of the building was being backfilled and compacted in six inch lifts with onsite gravel. Five compaction tests were performed using a sand cone in accordance with ASTM D1556. All five tests exceeded 950 of a' modified proctor derived by ASTM D1557. 'hese observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. nspector Premium Travel Jame Time Hours T. Grocer _ - Time No Min Day 3 Hr(s) ZEVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser >ur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko l UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Rkhsrdson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 05/21/2008 Attn: David av Dunlap� p Report No. 29 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment 05/25/2008 11:23 5087710835 NAUSET CONSTRUCTIN PAGE 09ii o �r ; (C 1 CO (y V. 0 � � n N � w d ® Q o B® i -a c- J o m° m z / -r SIN r' rJ f` r / e' b i � m n r- 7 � Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 05/20/2008 Report No. 28 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 0 2 3 3 9-12 2 7 Contractor Nauset Construction t WEATHER: Sunny, 45-57 degrees .TIME: 6 : 30 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, #624H loader, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.2 133.7 128.8 96.3 See sketch -4.0' 2 5.2 133.7 129.7 97.0 -3.0' 3 1 5.4 133.7 129.0 96.5 -2.0' OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Continuing to backfill the outside face of the wall on G-line. It was placed and compacted in six inch lifts. Three compaction tests were performed-by the sand cone method according to ASTM D1556. Test results exceeded 95% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. Water has collected in the interior of the building and is being pumped out so backfilling can begin tomorrow. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED-BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. IL ` f Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 05/20/2008 Report No. 28 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 05/20/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 28 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 1167'0 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency. Healthcare Ct.r. ,Centerville Attachment 05/23/2008. 11:23 5087710835 NAUSET CONSTP,UCTIN �: PAGE 03 1 --------------- H (c a ti �N n - L q % l' o m n D M 4 P.1 \~ CD a i (n z m n r Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 05/19/2008 Report No. 27 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street., Suite 2 Hanover, MA 023 3 9-12 2 7 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Partly cloudy, 50-60 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM.- CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, #624H loader, #AT175 mini excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: 0 Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location Elevation (Feet) ' 1 6.4 133.7 130.2 97.4 See sketch -6.0' 2 6.2 133.7 129.7 97.0 " 3 6.2 133.7 131.1 98.0 4 6.0 133.7 130.0 97.7 " OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: 3ackfilling of the outside face of the wall on G-line resumed with onsite gravel. It was placed and compacted in 12-inch lifts. Four compaction tests were performed according to ASTM D1556 using the nand cone method. All four test results exceeded 95% compaction of the modified proctor ASTM D1557- 'hese observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. nspector Premium Travel Vame Time Hours Time T. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) ZEVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser )ur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko f _ IJTS.of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 05/19/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 27 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Regency Cape Re Health p 9 Y care Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment 05/22/20M 11:38 5067710835 NAUSET CONSTRUCTIN PAGE 03/EG � S 1 � 11T 'A ? r Z — ? I n q Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report _ Report Date . 05/16/2008 Report No. 26 Job Number. 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset construction WEATHER: Cloudy, 51-59 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, #624H loader, #AT175 mini excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: Q Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 6.7 133.7 130.0 97.2 See sketch -7.5' 2 6.4 133.7 131.4 98.3 3 6.4 133.7 130.8 97.8 " 7.0' 4 6.2 133.7 131.7 98.5 5 6.0 133.7 129.6 96.9 " 6.5' 6 6.0 133.7 131.2 98.1 , 7 5.8 133.7 129.0 96.5 " OBSERVATIONS: Fhe purpose of this visit was to observe earthwork operations and perform field density tests. The Eollowing was observed: lontinuing to backfill the interior of the building with onsite gravel. Seven compaction tests were Derformed using a sand cone in accordance with ASTM D1556. All test results exceeded 95% compaction of .he modified proctor ASTM D1557. 'hese observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure nspector Premium Travel Jame Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) i:EVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser ✓} )ur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' 'Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-62116_(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 05/16/2008 Report No. 26 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow• Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko a UTS of-Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date. 05/16/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 26 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment 05/19/2008 09:53 5087710835 NAUSET CONSTRUCTIN FAGS 03/0'• I G s I J f ra = _. -7, 0 7:�J I i T i � I o w I I J. i Ii I I G) i 1 I �at�id?t. �u�eap o�dvciated, ��c. ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-PLANNERS 105 Webster Street, Units 1 &2 Hanover, MA 02339 (781)878-0066 FAX(781)878-7060 �O /IIa.a 5 7— E-mail: david@dhdunlap.com September 25, 2008 Mr. Thomas Perry, Director Building Division Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 _ f� Re: Cape Regency Assisted Living Dear Mr. Perry: Our office has compiled field reports from job meetings being held on a continuing basis at Cape Regency under Permit#B 20073078. This information is being provided to you for your records-as required under controlled construction, Section 116.2.1 of the MSB, 780 CMR 6th Edition. Attached hereto are field reports for June 19 -September 25, 2008. Per your request, attached hereto please find the testing reports for your information. Sincerely yours, C= SAID H. D AP ASSOC F INC. a rn David H. Dunlap,Jr.,NCAR _ vN+ v President e p. a° co w m rn Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 i 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Magnetic Particle Examination of Welds Report Report Date 09/16/2008 David Dunlap Report No. 1 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Job Number 11670 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Hanover, MA 02339 Contractor Nauset Construction Contacts: Al DeLuca, Nauset Description Of Details Inspected: Bar joist extension repairs Area Reviewed. Column lines E/7 west, E/7 west, and E/9 east and west; Specification Reference Contract Drawing Reference S-102 Project Specification Reference: 05120 Shop Drawing Reference: Sketch Reference: Test Method Standard: AWS Dl.1-2006 MT Unit Serial No.: Parker Probe 9601 Acceptance Standard: AWS D1.1-2006 MTSerial No.: DA-400 Inspection Method 0 Other: ❑X Continuous ❑ DC 0 Dry ❑ Half-Wave ❑ Residual ❑ Visual ❑ Wet ❑ Other: Weld Area TInterpretation Repairs ID/Location (%) Accept Reject Accept Reject Remarks Elevation: Joist extension repairs: D/7 west 100% X E/7 west 100% X E/6 east 100°s X E/6 west 100% X Pe, the undersigned, certify that the statements in this record are correct and that the welds were prepared and rested in accordance with the requirements of the American Welding Society AWS D1.1.2006 Structural Welding Code. Technician: K. VanHecke Level' II Interpreter: K VanHecke Level II 3ENERALREMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time K. VanHecke No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.'com for more information. CC: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Stan Szczu.rko Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 i Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Compressive Strength. Report - Concrete Report Date . 08/14/2008 David Dunlap Report No. 12 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Job Number 11670 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Hanover, MA 02339 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. P. A. Landers ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/811 No. Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 50 SET 1 LOCATION: SOD, Column line 2 at D Total. Unite Slump(in.) 7 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp. (F.) 76 No. (in.) . (sq.:in:) Condition Cast Tested Days (Ibs.) (psi:); Type. Conc Temp(F) 74 X175 4 x 8 12.56 Good 08/14/2008 08/21/2008 7 45,000 3,580 3 Truck No. 1291 X176 4 x 8 12.56 Good 08/14/2008 08/28/2008 14 56,000 1 4,460 4 1 Ticket No. 18118 X177 4 x 8 12.56 Good 08/14/2008 09/11/2008 28 57,000 4,540 1 Time 9.00 X178 4 x 8 12.56 Good 08/14/2008 09/11/2008 28 56,000 4,460 2 X179 4 x 8 12.56 Good 08/14/2008 09/11/2008 28 54,000 4,300 1 Unit Wt lbs/cu ft Air Content(%) * olarset, SAME DAY CALL IN. GENERAL REMARKS: P :.... Inspector Rremium : Travel Name Time Hours Time Kevin Fitzgerald No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES 7-7 (1) Cone (2) Cone and Split (3) Cone and Shear (4) Shear (5)Columnar Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 0 8/14/2 0 0 8 Report No. 12 David Dunlap David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Job Number 11670 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Hanover, MA 02339 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. P. A. Landers FIELD SUMMARY REPORT *Total Pour: SOD - Column line 1-4 at A.7-H Method of Placement: ❑X Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑ Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ❑X Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑X Truck Discharge Chute ❑ End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage:: ❑Curing Box ❑ Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑Trailer ❑X Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ❑X None ❑ Other Slump Specification (in.) 6 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: Slumps and cylinders performed at truck discharge chute - 1" slump loss at end of hose. THE FOLLOWING IS/ARE THE BEST IMAGES FROM POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL (S) MF�� DATA UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Report Date 08/14/2008 Report No. 12 Job Number 11670 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment i Of Maissa husem Inc. _ arm cmftw on T®starog m 6 �Page #-- � DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR PROJECT NAME: Ile PROJECT NO.: DATE: J����� ,� AIR TEMP.: TOTAL YARDS: - LOCATION OF POUR: S Load & Slump Batching Batching Time In i Yards Concrete % of f Ticket # I No. of Truck # Inches � In Out Minutes Temp. Air I jCylinders bO') i . SO i I INSPECTOR: ,� i h ;rL� P f ' < REMARKS: J i i n�dchardson Lane, Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180 (781) 438.7755 Fax (781) 438.621/ Of Massachusetts . 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Fireproofing Report Report Date 09/02/2008 Report No. 2 . David Dunlap David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Job Number 11670 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Hanover, MA 02339 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al Deluca of Nauset NUMBER OF DENSITY TESTS: NUMBER OF COHESION TESTS: SUMMARY: Observations A visit was made to the above mentioned project for the purpose of performing a fireproofing inspection. The following was observed: Spray application of Cafco 300 was completed. A visual inspection was made of the application between column lines 1-9 to G-C to 16-22 1st 2nd & 3rd floors. Coverage to columns & bracing throughout the area listed revealed acceptable coverage throughout. Thickness testing was also performed on this area. Results of the tests averages was also acceptable and in compliance with project specifications for 2 & 3 Hr rating, Columns' between 2 1/1611 & 1 3/4" . Sprayed fireproofing inspected was found to be acceptable& complete with the exception of areas requiring patching. A review was made with Al prior to departure. - GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time K. VanHecke No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree - Ws Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Stan Szczurko } June 19, 2008 CAPE REGENCY FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow , Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Al Deluca Assistant Super David Dunlap Purpose: Review the progress of the project. Weather: 75 degrees, sunny Construction Administration 1. Project.Schedule: January 2, 2009 A. No work was being performed at the time of this site view. We only saw administrative personnel on the job. A project schedule cannot be maintained unless there is an ongoing work force. Nauset needs to. manage the project so that there is a continual work flow. B. There have been minor delays due to the erection of the structural steel. The erector was not on-site because he reportedly broke down on the highway. C. WWTP:J. Teixeira advised it is now July 21". This is 34weeks later than we had previously discussed. GC to verify. 2. Owner's Concerns: A. GC has removed the ACT and damaged sheet rock and put the furniture, up on wood blocking but not the TVs (I am not sure why the TVs would be stored in an area where they can get wet). B. Fire department conversation relative to the temporary partitions. They don't have to be sprinkered as long as the space is checked once a day and combustible materials are not stored there. t C. GC indicated that the storage trailer has been relocated to an area at the end of the site so that the owner can remove furnishings from the basement so that the contractor can proceed with work. After viewing the basement area, not much work has been done. A question was raised on whether a new trailer is required. Discussion ensued but no determination was made. 3. Job super provided his look ahead to those in attendance. 4. Site Engineering: A. A question was raised last week about the grade being too steep for the (4) new parking spaces on the wetlands side of the property. Job super spoke with Stan and requested a sketch on how to handle it. A sketch was faxed but we could not read it. Another request is being to resolve this issue. B. No additional shop drawings are available on items inside the WWTP. 5. PCO's: A. New patio installation was to commence 6/17/08. It has been rescheduled for 6/24/08. This patio needs to be installed ASAP. This issue was raised by DPH and needs to be,take care of immediately. B. PCO#12: A extra for relocation of a gas line. We discussed in detail and found this to be excessive. The breakdown is not adequate to review. We have passed it along to Hall Engineering for their comments. C. PCO#13 Request for additional money to go to chrome finish on the hardware. DHDA checked with the hardware consultant and mfg. and there is no additional cost to go to a standard finish chrome. 6. ASI: A. #17: No pricing yet on the 5' showers. B. #10: Nauset was asked to get a quote on the Dunnes tile with 2 x 4 Second Look, which appears to be a 2 x 2 tile. C. GC had no questions on ASIs previously issued on the laundry area. We recommend that these ASIs be sent to Sagamore Plumbing as they are doing the coring submission of the deck. r I 7. Testing: No testing taking place at the time of this visit. Construction Phase 1. Discussed the staff's concerns on the demolition of the roof. There is no work on the roof at this time,but precautions will be taken when working on the roof. 2. Discussed the damage to the planting beds. It has been raked temporarily and will be replaced near the end of the project: 3. Discussed the new backflow preventor required on the domestic water. Hall Engineering to provide a sketch. 4. Phase I: A. Facility advised that they have not been provided an in-service on the RTUs. It was pointed out that the maintenance supervisor was not in the day it was given. Nauset has provided him the maintenance manuals and information for the RTUs. Nauset reported that the filters were changed by the maintenance supervisor and the units are working. B. The facility has not received the maintenance manuals for this phase. J. Teixiera stated he is work-on the manuals and these along with the warranties/guarantees will be provided by June 23`d. C. Discussed service calls made on the RTUs. Evidently the calls were not going through Nauset to correct the problems. Nevertheless, the is a one year guarantee unless calls were made for service do to loads of the RTUs being changed then it.would be covered. Service charges were,made due to PTACs in the existing building which froze when turned on. Nauset had them repaired only because they were on-site. No work is envisioned for these units. Walk-Thru 1. Reviewed the masonry walls around the WWTP. Walls are up,but roof steel needs to stay off until the units are set. .2. Job super indicated that the second floor over the new addition, the metal deck is going to be set next week and the slab poured so they can procee&with the work required above, i.e.: framing of mansards, venting through the slab to the roof, construction of the July 3, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT Jon P People on Truslow p , Jon Teixeira Paul, Super David Dunlap Purpose: Review progress of project. Workmen on Site: 3 steel erectors 0 sitework 0 concrete placement 2 plumbers Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: A. Completion date 1/2/09: 1. Steel erectors on-site work direct for One Steel. No steel was being erected. Work in progress was detailing, getting ready to pour the 1St floor slab. It was reported that the structural steel will be completed by 7/23/08. Additional steel workers will arrive on July 7,2008. B. Sewage treatment plant is scheduled 7/21/08. 2. Site Engineering: A. Grading of the.4 parking spaces: no work performed. B.. Status of work being performed on-site away from steel erection. C. Owner is using patio: 3. Job Super's Look Ahead: See attached. 4. PCO: No new PCOs. 6. ASI: . t A. #10: Dunes Tile: A suggestion was made to change to another ACT which would save approximately $3,500. J. Truslow to review with the owner. 7. Testing: None being performed as there little work underway. 8. Phase I: 1. In-services: A. Staff were trained for RTUs this week. B. Fire Alarm: Reported that the mainteance supervisor does not need an in-service on the changes to the fire alarm system. C. Electrical: Only lighting changed;no in-service required. 2. O&M Manuals were delivered to the site this week and to J. Ciccareillo. J. Truslow to contact him to see if the manual is acceptable. 9. Requisition: It was reviewed and found approvable as amended. J. Teixeira to revise and send for review on 7/7/08. Coordination of Construction Activities 1. Concrete: A. Pouring of floors: 7/7/08. The pour is over the new addition where.steel is erected. The garage will be poured 7/8/08. B. Opening between new and existing building has been cut. There is an issue on a cast iron sanitary line that is extremely close to the pocket. This should have been brought to our attention before it was cut. The door could have been moved to avoid the existing problem or the opening could have been extended to the deck above. Job super to review with the plumber and contractor to find out the best approach and then discuss with DHDA. The steel lintel has„not been set for this opening. C. Concrete floor in general storage has not been patched. Job super said he is not ready until he sets the column. Once set,he will pour. In the meantime he has spoken with Mike, maintenance supervisor, and they will arrange to ge3t the facility's storage out of the work area. 2. Miscellaneous Iron: We requested the status on the steel stairs. We.were given a revised submittal. GC to check on the misc. metal drawings for the elevator pit ladder,bollards and other miscellaneous iron required by the contract drawings. 3. Elevator: We advised that an ASI is being developed relative to adding a key pad to the elevator so that the residents cannot utilize the elevator, only those with a code. It appears that this would be separate from the E-call system. 4. HVAC: We requested the status on the delivery of equipment. We were advised that the equipment is presently located in a warehouse. We expressed our concern about the equipment based on issues that developed at Radius Plymouth. It was agreed that once the RTUs are set an equipment tech will check the units to see that the free-on is charged properly and test circuits to make sure there are no issues. 5. We were advised that we will receive ductwork shop drawings which are a part' of the coordination drawings. If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please notify this office in writing with in ten days receipt; otherwise,this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. July 10, 2008 CAPE REGENCY FIELD REPORT People Present: Anthony Papantonis Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Al Deluca Substitute Job Super David Dunlap Purpose: Review progress of project. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule:, A. Completion date 1/2/09: Those in attendance indicated that over-time will be required to meet the completion date. 1. Structural steel being erected for the third floor beams; 9 men on, the job. '2: Concrete was poured for the 2"d floor; finishing machine being used - when I left. 3. First floor concrete was being placed at 10:45 am. 4. Concrete subcontractor has 12 workmen; one pumper; one concrete truck on standby while the others were being emptied concrete pumper. 5. Light gage framing`rnaterial will be delivered 7/11/08. Installation will commence on the second floor 7/14/08. B. Sewage treatment plant: delivery date 7/21/08. Little'or-no info. is being provided by Loveless and/or update from site engineers. No clarification given on what material is going to be used for the steel grating, how it is supported or details. C. Sitework: Subcontractor will be on-site 7/11/08 to discuss how they can expedite their phase of the work,i.e.: installation of 2/3 of the leaching field. 2. Job super's look ahead was provided to those in attendance. 4 , 3. PCO/CO:None to be reviewed at this time. 4 4. ASI: A. #23: Piping for backflow preventor, domestic water. Jon Teixeira advised he has sent this to the plumbing sub. A form needs to be filled out by owner/engineer for the water dept. This needs to be returned. DHDA to contact B. Griffiths. B. Nauset requested an ASI on the key pad for the elevators. 5. Shop Drawings: A. PM requested status of sprinkler shops so that they can get the material fabricated and ADA shower. DHDA to contact Hall Engineering. B. DHDA returned the stair shop drawings. C. DHDA requested the resubmission on the coring. PM stated he has requested this of the plumbing sub and awaiting resubmission. We discussed some,of the issues with the coring. The drawings show a number of holes being cored that do not appear to be required, i.e.: core for 4" sanitary and 3" for sink. Normally this is a "Y" off the 4" stack. Discussed that the rainwater leaders are not shown for coring. 6. Testing: UTS has been on-site to inspect the reinforcing before pouring and taking concrete cylinders. 7. Requisition: We reviewed and appeared to be revised per DHDA's review of the pencil requisition. It was signed and PM to send to owner. Construction Phase 1. Plumbing inspector reportedly indicated that he will not accept PVC in the common areas,but will accept it in the apartments. DHDA to check with Hall Engineering what this means relative to separate of piping. 2. Job super requested layout of fire extinguisher cabinet. 3. Backfill and grading inside the new addition at the basement level is to be performed 7/11/08. Next job meeting is scheduled for 7/17/08. If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please contact this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise it shall stand as written. David.H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. i July 17, 2008 CAPE REGENCY FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow Jon Teixeira Doug Dupree David Dunlap Purpose: Review progress of,project. Walk-Thru We did a walk-thru prior to starting the meeting and the following was observed: 1. Progress has.been made on the structural steel framing over top of the existing link. 2. The steel framing for the 3rd floor has been installed (but not the roof). The last bay which ties into the existing structure is having the pockets cut out for the beams that penetrate. The super pointed out that (3) areas require modification to the structural framing in order to place the load on the existing bearing wall. These areas are primarily the areas where lintels exist for existing windows. DHDA to contact the structural engineer to view the existing conditions. DHDA requested that some of the field welds be x-rayed. 3. The plumber was setting up the cores in the new addition floor slab which was recently poured. We discussed consolidating some of the coring . Steel fabricators were welding the structural channel to the new stair. This is an area that was modified. due to fabrication error. 4. Contractor is starting to frame up exterior walls. We noted our concerns with the stud installation: s A. Drawings call for a continuous neoprene pad under the exterior walls as a thermal break. B. On the backside an exterior stud wall does not line up with the foundation wall. The foundation wall appears to extend out between 1/2" -3/4". ' Detail calls for the sheathing to extend by the finish floor line for moisture protection. C. We pointed out that the new concrete floor slab is supposed to be 1.5" over the precast plank,which it does not do. D. Fire-rated expansion joint cover was not boxed out or installed in the concrete pour. E. We questioned the method of framing to support the deck behind and beside the elevator. Please provide information on these supports. Appear to be steel channels instead of bar joists. 5. Perimeter insulation has been installed. I asked if this is the insulation submitted, which was required to have structural qualities,to support the floor load. I was advised that it did. It was. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: A. Completion date: 1/2/09 B. Completion date steel erection: 7/25/08. Presently there are (7) steel erectors on site (no crane on-site). C. Lighting gage framing: Work commenced today and will be completed by 7/25/08. There were only (2) framers on the job. on Monday, the crew will be increased to (4). Discussed our concerns with the present installation of the framing. Job super to follow up. D. Additional workmen on-site: (5) demolition (2) plumbers 2. Sewage Treatment Plant: A. The delivery date appears to change due to a payment requirement. Reported time of installation is 7/28/08. B. We still have not received shop drawings on decking,ladders, etc. required to be provided by Raggs, site contractor. 3. Site Engineering: No work is being done, and none is-anticipated. DHDA indicated that this is a problem and will delay the completion of the project. 4. Job super's look ahead: We reviewed last week's look ahead as he could not update it due to printer failure. 5. Shop Drawings: A. Being Reviewed:Fire Protection B. Returned: stairs slab vapor barrier finish door hardware hydraulic calcs and shop dwg. ADA shower regency chiller C. The sprinkler contractor requested additional information on why the sprinkler system was rejected. I stated that there were issues with the calculations submitted. We discussed whether the residential requirements wouldn't allow the system to be down graded to achieve economies. DHDA to review with the engineer. D. DHDA pointed out that Hexaport's trusses raised more questions than they answer. The overhang will be 11",but as I pointed out to those in attendance, there is a combination of trades. Another company is providing the light gage framing members. DHDA's concern is that the detail we saw is inconsistent with the construction documents and appeared to be different than the light gage framing since the roof was designed for 6 and 12,which is what was required. At the bottom of the truss, it is designed for.4 and 12. We know that the 12 "C" channels are 6 and 12 on the roof and the ceiling, so how are the contractor intending to ' hang the suspended drywall ceiling? 6. Testing:UTS is testing on an ongoing basis. Discussed testing the grout to be utilized for the bearing of the steel as it ties into the existing masonry bearing wall. 7. PCO/CO: A. J.' Teixeira provided an update on the ACT PCO with a credit for using a different ACT. J. Truslow to check with Chris Basset. i B. PCO was issued for an add to install cast iron hubless in common areas of assisted living as it is a requirement of the local plumbing inspector. Hall Engineering requested coming to the job meeting next week so we can understand this requirement and discuss cost associated with it. If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise,this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr.. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. July y 31 2008 CAPE REGENCY FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow Jon Teixeira Al Deluca Paul,Nauset David Dunlap Purpose: Review the progress of the project and discuss concerns that. Dolores has with the ongoing construction. . Construction Administration n 1. Construction Schedule: A. Completion date 1/2/09 B. J. Teixeira provided a revised construction schedule which includes the delays experienced from the steel construction. 1. complete steel: 1 week. 4 pockets in the masonry remain. 2. No steel erectors on site 3. Demo contractor cutting openings in the existing masonry bearing wall. 4. Light gage framing ongoing. 5. Living room on 1st floor has the trusses set but not the "C"joist. B. Sewage Treatment P1ant:.This remains to be a problem; delivery is up in the air. The following was discussed: 1. The contract Raggs has with the company constructing the plant appears to be the hold up on when the equipment will be released. 2. The schedule is that once the equipment is 100%paid for which will'take a minimum of 30 days, 10 days to ship equipment,_which appears to be a 6 week delay from this date and 8 weeks from the date originally scheduled which was July 21" 3. We discussed how the project could be completed-with this delay. Nauset advised that they have been trying to resolve this with the site contractor and have had little to no success. They have even contacted the manufacturer of the plant who refuses to give them any information because their contract is with Raggs. 4. Jon Truslow is reluctant to pay 100% as there will be no leverage if the plant is received and is faulty in some way. Nauset indicated that there safeguard is to give dual checks to make sure that the manufacturer of the plant gets paid but this does not solve if the plant is deficient. 2. Site Engineering: Stan was at the meeting and provided Drawing C-1 which has been updated to show the design required for supporting the grates in the sewage treatment room. Stan advised that he is putting this out for bid. We have been trying to get this resolved for months and it is just now that the grate is being priced. Stan stated that the site contractor has the cost in his bid. Grates, columns and angles to be steel due to the corrosiveness of the gases in the room. Stan advised that he is putting together a bid package to request bids for maintaining the plant which shall meet DEP requirements andi the manufacturer's recommendations. 3. Job super provided his look ahead for 8/4-8/23/08. 4. Shop Drawings: DHDA has returned all shop drawings submitted. We still need to select the color and size of the shake specified. GC to provide color chips and a same of the 7" to the weather and 9" to the weather. 5. Testing: Test dated 7/15/08 had an error and by return to my office it had been reissued with the error eliminated. Construction Phase 1. The owner advised J. Truslow that there have been issues with the construction which they deem unsatisfactory. It was agreed that Nauset, DHDA and J. Truslow would meet with Dolores Schremer to do a walk-thru to discuss the issues. She advised the following: A. The fire access road that goes by the new patio is presently bare dirt causing dust and unsightly appearance to the residents who utilize the patio. She requested that stone be laid over this area to hold down the dust and make it more presentable. Nauset stated they will do this. B. We walked out front to the turn around, existing entrance and trailer. She advised that this is an unsightly condition which unsafe for visitors and also impairs her ability to market the facility. She wants the area to be cleaned up and use a motorized sweeper to clean the entire drive. If necessary it shall be done on a continuing basis to keep the area free and clear to provide safe access. Al Deluca stated that he would arrange for this. C. She wants the construction fences to be maintained, gates closed,the ends of the fences secured so that the visitors or patients could not get around it for safety issues. Al Deluca stated that this will be addressed. D. The top soil mounded in the center of the driving loop is unsightly and allows dust to get in the air providing a poor environmental condition for the visitors and it detracts from her ability to market the facility. Nauset agreed to have the material either removed from the site or placed at the rear of the site. Issue to be considered is that if the top soil is placed in the rear,we don't want it to affect the neighbors who have a swimming pool. An alternative location was discussed on the access drive side of the existing center island. However,protection of the wetlands needs to be of primary concern. This eliminates disruption to the neighbors. Once this is relocated,then the area should be re-graded to a semi-finished condition. E. A sign needs to be provided that defines what the addition is,the owner/operator's name, rendering if possible and then the names of GC and architect. The suggested location was in close proximity to the addition; however, once the sign has been constructed, it shall be revisited and perhaps it should.go at the entrance off of Main Street. The owner to determine. GC to provide sign. DHDA to see if there is a rendering. F. We discussed the large general storage area in the basement which still requires concrete to be poured. Dolores recommended that this work be completed. Nauset requested that the contents be relocated and Dolores indicated that Nauset should provide a trailer for it. Nauset will provide a trailer. G. Al Deluca indicated that the HM frame for the dietician's office shall be delivered in the near future. It will be completed, the office relocated and then develop the prep area. E H. We went to the 1" floor and Dolores pointed out areas where roof leaks are causing substantial interior damage, i.e.: tiles damaged,walls warped/buckling in the entrance corridor, new dining room and administrative offices. These areas need to be put back into a usable condition. The PM was given the task to provide a schedule for each bay of the 1st floor to include the time table, what is to be done and when it is going to happen and how long it needs to be unoccupied so'the work can be done. I. The job super advised that between two administrative offices the outside has to be removed and seismic bracing installed and then the wall replaced. This will eliminate the ability to use this area for a period of . time. This will be addressed in the new schedule. J. If the roof is leaking then the beautiful ACT,which is no longer manufactured should be removed from the area, stored and stockpiled, and a fissured tile installed in its place until it can be controlled. Nauset indicated in two weeks the roof will be placed on the new addition and the side walls will then be sheathed which will eliminate moisture from getting into the area. This needs to be confirmed, If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise,this report shall stand as written. David H.Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. August 21, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Chris Bassett Jon Truslow Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Al Deluca Paul, Super David Dunlap Purpose: Review the progress of the project and discuss a number of outstanding issues that need to be addressed immediately. Construction Administration 1. Items discussed with owner: A. The owner wants to.revise the office layout on the ground floor so that it can be large and be a waiting area for family members. Anne Web- Johnson to send us a sketch of the layout. B. Reviewed the controlled access locations of the doors in various parts of the building. There was an addendum that clarified issues on hardware and who supplies the controlled access devices. C. Roofer made a recommendation for the terrace area. He said that the membrane needs to be sloped to the roof just as well as the top of the patio deck.because in his opinion there is no way that the water isn't going to get through the concrete and if the membrane is flat, the water will just lay there. We had an in-depth discuss took place and the alternatives need to be reviewed. Job-super to contact the waterproof membrane subcontractor to get a sketch of his recommendations. DHDA will , develop alternatives as well. We discussed putting sloped insulation on top of the metal deck, then the membrane, then the protection board and then concrete. This is DHDA's No. 1 recommendation. D., Showers: It was determined at the last meeting that showers with curbs 1 . are not acceptable for this population. Consequently, Nauset was instructed,who in turn instructed Sagamore to cancel the order until an acceptable shower can be obtained. E. A couple of months ago an issue came up relative to changing the PT location from the original design. Sketches were done and time spent. It was determined by Chris that this is not an appropriate thing to do for a variety of reasons and because during the design process this was thought out and a determination made. We see no reason to change it at this time. Nauset was instructed to not pursue any additional information in that regard. F. ` It was pointed out that the reception desk is where the existing nourishment station is presently. This has been demolished and removed. It was reported that the owner has a temporary nourishment station reconfigured in the dining room area to satisfy this requirement. G. Chris stated that she wants a TV jack and power outlet mounted high on the wall so that a platinum screen can be installed in this area. The TV and power outlet also needs to be mounted high in the apartment itself. TV screen in the apartment would be 33" . The one in the bed alcove is to be 26". Mary Lou has the cuts for the TV. µ H. J. Teixeira needs to finalize the acquisition of the actual'cabinet and counter colored samples and have them delivered to Wellesley Design to Anne Web-Johnson's attention. This has been requested on a number of occasions and is holding up the final selection of the furniture in the facility. Without the sample it is futile to proceed. I. We reviewed the.exterior doors with J. Truslow to show which ones have sets and which had the.controlled access. He appeared to have the information needed to proceed. 2. We discussed the job super's look ahead. 3. Shop drawings: A. Expansion joint has not been delivered to the job site yet. B. ASI#29: Showers with curbs have been cancelled. Once we have correct model number and cut of the shower we will proceed. 4. Testing: A. Welds in field have not been x-rayed. UTS needs to be notified. Construction Phase 1. Structural engineer to be on-site 8/22/08 to perform a walk-thru. 2. Owner's concerns: A. Leaks causing interior damage to administrative offices. dining room and corridors: A. Deluca stated that the roofer is finalizing the roof installation so there will be no more water coming from the roof. DHDA requested that the sheathing be done starting adjacent to the existing building and working away from it so that water will not blow in and cause leaks. . B. Seismic bracing has not been installed in the administrator's office and needs to be completed. C. Waiting for HM for the dietician's office. 3. Electrical subcontractor and fire alarm company shall not contact the fire department without going through the normal process. We are requesting that the questions brought up by the fire alarm company saying that the existing panel would not work, that there are issues with the two fire alarm systems tying into each other and other issues that appear problematic be provided and once the questions are known, we will review them with the engineer and an interpretation will be provided on how the system should be put together. DHDA is requesting a submission on the fire alarm system, controlled access, etc. so that we have complete information when reviewing with the fire department. 4. We met with the light gage framing contractor to discuss how framing should be done around the 1" and 2nd floor windows in the center of the addition and discussed that the insulation needs to be placed between the jack studs or studs at the heads of any windows or openings. Energy conservation is important on this project. 5. We talked to the job super about Atlantic running piping through the assisted living apartments especially where it is depressed where it is depressed for the terrace above. We suggested considering using the space between the top of the steel beam and the metal deck. This is approx. 2.5 -3" of space. This would allow the ceilings to be located at a higher level. We also looked at the living room. There is a question about soffits in the living 4 room. Above the living room is the mansard which is presently empty. DHDA would consider having the ductwork run inside the mansard then supply air to the living room so it meets the requirements of the construction documents. We believe this would eliminate soffits..The same should be considered for the sprinkler. Perhaps the mansard needs to be insulated. 6. Last week we discussed heat tracing the drains on the terrace to keep the drains from freezing. We also walked around and discussed where the cross-bracing needs to be furred out as it protrudes into the apartment. There is nothing.that we can do about this. The building.needs to meet seismic requirements. 7. We reviewed the steel pan stair and it did not appear to be consistent with the construction documents. It did not look like the hand rail was going to clear. If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise,this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr. ' David H. Dunlap Associates,Inc. August,13, 2008 CAPE REGENCY FIELD REPORT People Present: Dolores Schremer Jon Truslow Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Al Deluca Paul, Nauset David Dunap Purpose: Review progress of project and to see if the owner's requests were complied with. Construction Administration L. Project Schedule: A. Completion date: 1/2/09. 1. Steel: A major portion of the steel has been erected including the roof, except for the roof over the sewage treatment plant._ This has not been set as we need to install the sewage treatment plant before the roof can go.on: 2. Concrete slab on the second floor was being poured. Note: Expansion joint depression not provided in the pour. DHDA provided an expansion joint that could be used for the floors on this project. However,we still need wall and ceiling expansion joints. I' contacted the supplier whose name was provided by J. Teixeira. When we emailed him the plans and information, the email would not go through. We called to confirm the email,but no response.. 3. Light'Gage Framing: Mansard is 90% complete with Dens-glass installed. Cement board was installed on 3 sides of the terrace but the side of the terrace that is up against the entrance wall needs cement board as well. Light gage framing for the living room is approximately 80% done. See job super's look ahead for additional information on framing. B. -Sewage Treatment Plant: J 1. Payment has not been made. They are waiting for July requisition to be processed, which had been approved by DHDA and sent to A. Rosoff with 8.7.08 with the waiver of liens. Nauset stated that they cannot make the final payment to the site contractor until they are reimbursed. This means that the plant is not been sent through. Nauset stated that they are having trouble contacting Raggs to discuss the plant and related issues. Delivery date is open. This is unacceptable. 2. Sitework: A. J. Truslow indicated that a spec for maintenance and testing of the sewage treatment plant has been developed by Stan and is presently being bid. B. Dolores indicated that the drives and walks have been swept clean but due to the ongoing rain they are covered again. Nauset needs to keep after this. C. The gravel has not been placed on the road that abuts the new patio. Nauset is waiting on a sketch from the site engineer that he had at the meeting. The owner requested that stone be provided for two HCP parking spaces. Nauset pointed out that it is difficult for the handicap to navigate over stone. "Recommendations are as follows: 4 1. Use smaller stone and stone dust to provide a navigable path. 2. DHDA recommends that the HCP spaces be spray painted of the visitor parking lot which is paved with a temporary sign and then use the gravel area as just two parking spaces. The facility has been cited by the town„for not having HCP spaces. D. Top soil has not been relocated. Nauset trying to reach the sitework contractor with no avail. Nauset stated that they would move it when they place the stone. E. Project Sign: DHDA provided a conceptual drawing for the project sign. D. Schremer reviewed it. Evidently,the name needs to be modified. J. -Truslow to send DHDA the correct name so it can be redone and then issued as an ASI to the GC for fabrication. 3. Job Super provided a look ahead to those in attendance. 4. Shop Drawings: A. DHDA spoke with Bob Bielski at Mel Grant Associates on 8/10/08. He requested plans,which we tried to email to him but it got kicked back so we sent him a hard copy in the mail. He indicated that he would provide cuts and a catalog for future reference. 5. Testing: A. DHDA requested that x-rays of the welds,be done in the field on the superstructure where field welds were performed. UTS to perform. UTS did a visual inspection but this is not what we had requested. B. Discussed that where the compactions failed inside the footprint of the building, remedial work took place and UTS re-tested and it did reach required compaction. See UTS test results. 6. J. Teixeira re-issued the PCO relative to the change in the ACT to fire=rated tile. He gave out signed C.O. #18 relative to cast iron piping and issued RFI#21 relative to location of fire extinguisher cabinets and RFI#24 regarding clarification on hardware, RFI#25 regarding clarification to sinks. Construction Phase 1. Owner's concern: A. Leaks causing interior damage: it was reported that leaks are ongoing,but the GC advised that the materials for the additions roof are on-site. They need to install the roof blocking and then they will be able to install the roof. As far as,the siding of the building, once the light gage studs are' installed,sheathing will begin at that end so as to eliminate the moisture penetration into the facility. The super indicated that they understood there was damage in the building and that it would be repaired. Dolores stated that the real concern is with the computers and other equipment in the facility. 2. The work where a lintel is required in the foundation wall has not been installed as the plumbing line needs to be relocated. { 3. Nauset has brought another trailer on-site for the owner's use. The owner indicated that the large storage room is now available for work. We would like this work done sooner than later so that the storage room can be utilized for the purpose intended. 4. The HM frame for dietician's office is not on-site. It is anticipated that this frame and other welded frames will be brought to the site within 3 weeks and installed immediately. 5. DHDA asked Nauset how they were going to handle the issue relative to the precast plank and the topping that has been left off. We were advised that a f combination of levelastic and gyperete will be installed. Our office indicated that we have not received a submission on this for our review and the structural engineer's. It appears that the gyperete will be problematic due to the depth needed for gyperete to stand up. What is the elevation difference between the finished floor in the existing building and the top of the precast plank? 6. J. Truslow indicated that the owner wants to relocate the PT area.from what is show and approved on the drawings back to where the PT space was originally and that the sitting be put inwhere the PT space is. In order to get this to work, there needs to be a door through the connecting 2-hr. corridor into the existing transitional kitchen. We need to know if a ramp is required in the existing building. If it isn't then having the door is achievable. 7. Questions arose regarding plumbing: A. Showers: It appears that showers that are not indicated to be HCP accessible have a curb that requires you to step into the shower. The owner does not want this type of condition so the showers need to be replaced with a shower that has a 3/4 lip for easy access into the shower. We asked Sagamore to find out if they make this shower. After calling the distributor it was confirmed that they make this shower. The current order needs to be cancelled immediately and the new showers ordered. Evidently there are two or three showers on site which should be returned if possible. B. A question arose on the sinks in the patient bathroom: The architectural drawings call for vanities even for the HCP sinks. The sink specified is a wall-mounted sink. This is also unacceptable and needs to be changed out. DHDA requested the plumbing engineer to provide an ASI to clarify these items but again the sinks should be cancelled to eliminate delivery charges. 8. We discussed the change to fire-rated Dunes tile. DHDA provided a supplemental reflected ceiling plan. It was pointed out that the schedule shows 2 x 4 Second Look Dunes and 2 x 2 Dunne. We pointed out that in the basement corridor where there is plank above,the 2 x 4 Dunes can be used as it does not need to be fire rated ceiling;however,it is not the case when you get into the steel frame assembly. 9. DHDA provided revised drawings: A-3: 1st Floor Plan showing the outdoor terrace. A supplement plan was shown so that the poured-in-place concrete can be scored properly and shows the dimensions for the layout of same. It also indicated that a vestibule is required before going out on the terrace. This vestibule will not only act as security but also as an air lock. We don't want patients out on the terrace. A-6: Now that a poured-in-place concrete slab is going to be used on the roof,we are going to maintain 8" pitch per foot which requires a different layout that is shown on drawing A-6. Next meeting is scheduled'for August 2?with Nauset and the owner. DHDA to be on- site August 28th at 9:30 am. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. 7 j i August 28, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Donna McClung, Ex. Director Mike Berendsen,Maintenance Director Jon Truslow, Radius Jon Teixeira,Nauset Al Deluca,Nauset Paul Conner,Nauset Stan, Site Engineer David Dunlap Purpose: To be introduced to the new executive director, Donna McClung and to review the progress of the project. Donna was introduced to the construction team. She advised that she will be in and out of the meetings depending upon the stage of the project and what information she needs or provide comments about the interface of construction activities and the operations. She indicated that she is concerned about the drives and parking area as it is problematic for the visitors. She is primarily interested in their safety. She indicated that she is concerned about the marketability due to the pile of dirt blocking the view of the building. She was under the impression that she would be getting the gravel installed adjacent to the new patio which has not taken place and two parking spaces outside. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: A. We asked about the completion date for the project. Jon Teixeira stated it is still 1/2/09. An updated schedule to be provided at the next meeting. 1. 1.. I asked if the roof has been completed. I was advised that it was but the metal work still needs to be installed around the perimeter and flash the new RTUs. B. Sewage Treatment Plant: 1. The roof has not been installed because the sewage treatment equipment needs to be installed first. r r 2. J. Teixeira advised that it will be delivered the week of September 15th 3. We advised Stan that we would like him or Tom Ryder to be on site to inspect the equipment when it arrives to make sure that all of the pieces and parts have been delivered. Stan said there will be a bill and at the very least they can go through the component parts listed there and make sure they are on-site. It should also be inspected for damage. Anything different from SS Design's concept, they need to be noted and given to the truck driver and a copy sent direct to the manufacturer and the subcontractor who is responsible for this'work. We all understand how critical this portion of the project is in order to open on time. If it is not delivered complete and undamaged it will impede the completion of the project. 4. Stan stated that a critical portion of the installation is that the equipment cannot get wet. If it does it will not function as designed. He did say that while the equipment is in the crate, it is weather-protected. More information to follow. 5. Once equipment is installed, field measurements shall be made so that the grate, ladders and catwalk shop drawings can be submitted for approval by Stan. 6. Tentative schedule provided by Stan: a'. Once the equipment is set into the sewage treatment building,it will take approx. 2 weeks to pipe the unit. b. Then the equalization tank will be dropped in and then piping run to it, approx. a 2-day operation. C. Install fields and run the lines to the fields. Fields to be done by mid to late October. d. Goal is to have the system operable by mid-November, which will allow 2 weeks for inspection by DEP and the local authorities so that the plant can be licensed. 7. Stan is developing a spec for the maintenance program for this facility. He is working with Jon Truslow. It appears that he is waiting for the owner's attorney to return the spec so he can put it v .+ y out to bid to (5) companies. 2. Sitework: A. It was pointed out that the gravel has not been installed adjacent to the new patio constructed for the facility. B. The top soil has not been removed yet as requested by the owner. C. It appears that the parking and drives need to be cleaned again. 3. Job Super's Look Ahead. 4. Shop Drawings: A. DHDA spoke with Mel Grant regarding the expansion joints and type recommended for this project. He is to submit them for review. B. DHDA is waiting for the following.submittals: 1. miscellaneous metals a. elevator pit ladder b. ladder to roof C. bollards, etc. 2. toilet room accessories 3. IPC kickplates and corner guards 4. - building signage C. ASI#29: We asked the GC to contact the plumber to see if lasco showers can provide a replacement shower so we can review the cut. J. Truslow requested that the cut Hall provided be given to the GC so they can find out the status for obtaining that shower and if we can find another one in the mean time we will review it. 5. Testing: Paul provided a recommendation by UTS to field check the welds instead of x-raying them. DHDA to send through to structural engineer for approval. Construction Phase L } s 1. Owner's concerns: A. Status of leaks causing interior damage: Facility stated that there has been' no additional damage due to rain since the roof was installed. B. They are anxious to get the stone in place as discussed a number of weeks ago, the exterior sign installed and the top soil removed. C. Facility indicated that they relocated the HCP signs to a paved area which is more appropriate for the HCP to park a car. 2. J. Teixeira requested a sketch'on the trench drain which needs to be added to the outdoor terrace. DHDA to contact engineer. 3. Owner'requested that some cabinets be reinstalled in areas where they were removed. 4. Owner requested that DHDA take a look at the temporary construction barriers to see if they could be removed. DHDA went up to the 2nd and 3rd floors. Large holes need to be cut in the plank along with some demolition under a window where the new corridor will tie into the addition; therefore,they cannot be removed at this time. We did request that this portion of the owrk be expedited. so that the facility can have their spaces back. The dining room has been turned back over to the facility. When viewing it, it looked very nice. J. Teixeira provided a schedule for getting back various rooms around the main entrance. A. Deluca to expedite the exterior framing so that the offices can be returned as well. We saw that an electrical panel has been relocated at the new entrance to the assisted living. If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H.Dulnap Associates, Inc. r September 11, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARHCITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow Tony Papantonis Jim Goulet Al Deluca Jon Teixeira Victor Peters David Dunlap Purpose: Review the progress of the project. Prior to starting the meeting we did a walk-thru of facility to review the work in place: 1. Steel pan stairs have been installed and the pans filled with concrete. It appears that a number of details were not followed that are reflected in the contract drawings,i.e.: A. Handrail at the top of the stair needs to be 42". B. Top of stair needs the stringer close off the exposed structure. C. The landings at each floor were higher than the floor slab that was poured. D. Closers were not installed at the landing per the details. E. Welding and workmanship on the balusters tying into the handrail were suspect-uneven, welds not filled. GC advised that the stair installer was advised of many of these issues and that they will be back to do repairs. ' 2. We pointed out that at the roof there were angle irons left out where the RTUs rest on the roof deck. 3. We looked at the seismic bracing that goes into the existing building and the attachment angles do not match the structural engineer's sketches. 4. Job super pointed out where lintels were not installed over two windows on the first floor. His recommendation is to in-fill with block which is exactly what should be done from the structural standpoint. 5. We reviewed the resetting of a window to allow for the fan coil units to sit in front of them. The demonstration unit was acceptable except for the sill except where they use 4 or 5 pressure or fire-treated pieces of lumber to raise the sill. It was recommended that raising of the sill be done with metal studs and to use just one 2 x around the perimeter so that the windows can be attached. 6. Jon truslow requested that angles be placed on the double-hung windows so that they cannot be raised and keep residents from going out the window. We explained how this could be done. ` 7. Discussed that the existing building does not line up with the slabs which are poured in place. This was a condition that was supposed to be checked early on in the job. Surveyor was finally brought in and confirmed that it would line up. Now when they break through it does. Remedial work is required. 8. It was reported that some of the bridging had been removed or cut when the ductwork was installed. This needs to be repaired and the continuity of the bridging maintained. Super said he would see that this is taken care of. 9. It was reported that the replacement bar joists are in the process of being installed where cores had gone through bar joists because the bar joists did not line up with the set of bar joists on the floor above. 10. Skylight was not installed in the stair tower. 11. Steel for exhaust fans at the roof were not installed per the detail. 1/A-6a. This was in a number of locations.' Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: A. Completion Date: 1/2/09 B. Discussed that RTUs have not been installed and need to be. GC advised that it will happen the week of 9/15/08. C. Job super's look was reviewed. 2. Sewage Treatment Plant: A. Plant to be on-site next week. Design engineer to review equipment when it comes off the truck and provide comment on whether the equipment is as designed and it was not damaged in shipment. Reviewed again that the equipment cannot get wet. We were advised that the contractor will make provisions to see that it doesn't. This is important since the roof cannot be installed until the equipment is placed in the building. B. Confirmed that once the equipment has been installed field measurements will be made for the catwalks, ladders, grating system, etc. and shop drawings will be submitted to the site engineer for review. C. Goal is to have the system operable by mid-November to allow for 2 weeks for inspection by DEP. Stan is coordinating DEP inspection of the plant and the fields so they can be dug, etc. D. Jon advised that bidding of the maintenance program will be done in the near future. All understand that in order to get the approval from DEP a program and testing lab needs to be licensed and contracted for in order to maintain the equipment once it starts up. 3. Gravel has been placed by the back patio. 4. GC to see that the drives remain clear of dirt and construction debris and haybales will be maintained to protect the wetlands and that when excavation of the fields takes place, no dirt, stone, etc. gets on the public way. 5. Shop Drawings: A. DHDA is reviewing the expansion joint submission. B. Job super reported that the tyvek being used is commercial grade and a 6. mil vapor barrier will be installed on the warm side. C. Discussed that we have not received miscellaneous metal shop drawings which we have gone over on a number of occasions. D. We have not received toilet room accessories submission. E. Waiting for IPC kickplates and corner guards to be installed and the building signage. F. Vinyl Siding: We need to see the component parts, i.e. exterior and interior corners,termination bar, etc. so that we understand how the material goes together. GC indicated that the vinyl around the windows was eliminated under Value Engineering. We were advised that 1 x 3 pressure-treated aluminum wrapped will be provided in their place. G. Returned the chilled water piping submittal to the GC. 6. PCO: A. GC provided PCO #21 which shows the labor that was required to raise the window sill. We thought it was a reasonable amount, approx. $400/window. T. Papantonis recommended that it be done on a T&M not to exceed. We discussed the fact that there are windows that could stay down, i.e` living room. DHDA to develop a sketch showing the sills to be raised. B. PCO #16 was provided relative to adding hose bibs to the project. While the cost came down,Jon needs to review it with the owner. We discussed not using two hose bibs in the terrace area,but it was requested by the owner. It will add to the cost already shown. 7. ASI: A. Showers: They have been submitted and are being reviewed by the plumbing engineer. Relative to questions raised relative to accessories shown on the contract drawings and in the specifications each shower has a rod and curtain. Grab bars are called for in the shower. If the GC wants them included in the shower when fabricated this is OK. Recommendation was to keep the grab bars stainless steel so they residents can see them easily. Tony Papantonis recommended a removable curtain that can be obtained with this shower. He is concerned about the water leaking on the bathroom floor and becoming a hazard. In other projects they have done, the curbs are used more times than not. However,they want flexibility for HCP individual so the curb can be removed. B. DHDA provided information on the trench`drain from Hall Engineering. Asked those in attendance if there were a more economical way to install this or a manufacturer. They said what was submitted was a standard trench drain,but requested a detail. D. DHDA issued the following ASIs: 1. ASI#36 with drawings showing the location of the fire extinguisher cabinets as requested by the fire department was provided at this meeting. 2. ASI#37: Steel Beam Penetration 3. ASI#38 Cabinet Heater 4. ASI#39 Sink Designations Construction Phase 1. Owner's Concerns: A. No additional leaks have been reported in the existing building- B. At this time, no problems have been reported relative to the construction interfering with the.operations. C. Parking is an issue. We discussed it relative to installing the leaching fields. This is going to be a monumental disruption in the center of the site and a number of parking spaces are going to be eliminated. GC to meet with the facility's staff to discuss the sequence and relocating of parking. GC pointed out that the leaching fields cannot be installed unless center of the site where,it is designed is opened up, excavated,proper materials and piping installed, etc. and then covered back up; then the roads and parking can be repaired and replaced as shown on the contract drawings. Access in and around the facility needs to be maintained on a continuing basis which the GC has been good at doing to this point. 2. The building inspector came to the job meeting. He had a concern about the use of the facility. He said the use was never made known to the town. DHDA pointed to Drawing T-1 which is relevant to code data, MBS Revision 6, Chapter 3 Use or Occupancy, Section 3.08.1 Residential Groups, Assisted Living specifically is considered an R-2 Use, Section 310.4. We then went through the-type of construction being built and asked him what ' his concerns were. He indicated that he thought it was an I2 Occupancy because the Alzheimer's residents are not capable of self-preservation.' We pointed out that this is not the case. We reported that the individuals are screened before coming to the facility and most are ambulatory. At the end stages4hey become incapacitated and that is the reason it is attached to a long-term care facility. The assisted living staff work with the resident, keep them involved in activities, watch their health and mental state, and if they become end stage they would be re-diagnosed and be put into a long-term care facility. This is an excellent situation for this type of resident because they can stay within the same building. We pointed out that care is not provided in assisted living. There are no nurses so that in order to stay in this setting you need to be capable of meeting prescribed requirements, one of which is to be ambulatory. The inspector pointed out that this is not his understanding of what was going to happen in this facility. He asked where the nurses' stations were, how the residents are taken care of and who would evacuate them in the event that they needed to be. We went back over that while the residents may be confused they are capable of ambulating including egressing the building when or if necessary. He asked if they are locked. We said that controlled access which is a device that is allowed under the state code and the life safety code which allow the residents to egress the building when or if needed We pointed out that this is not a licensed facility to provide healthcare services. We stated that we want him to feel comfortable with his understanding of how the facility is to be run. We asked if the facility could provide him the parameters to take place, how they are going to take care of the residents,and what would happen if they are not capable of performing daily life skills. J. Truslow to interface with the owner and provide documentation on how they- manage their other.assisted living facilities. We advised that we had discussed this with the zoning board in detail prior to obtaining their approval prior to proceed with this type of facility. The building, inspector stated he would speak with the building commissioner and get back to the job super with any additional questions. J. Truslow to coordinate the flow of information between the owner and building department. The building inspector pointed out that the electrical inspector wants all of the wiring to meet hospital-grade. Again we pointed out that since this is a residential use it is not how the code requires the building to be wired,but we will provide the necessary information from-the electrical engineer. The inspector stated that this was just brought to his attention last night and he did not have a chance to research the code and since he was not sure how the facility handled an Alzheimer's patient he wanted to come to the jobsite to discuss it. We stated that we appreciated that he came and would like to provide ' him the necessary information he needs to make a positive determination thaqt the assisted living is allowed as designed. t. We reviewed the 2-hr..fire-rated horizontal exits that exist between the assisted living and the long-term care. We started at the basement and went up through the roof. We also discussed the fire ratings and type of systems in the building which are life safety related to assure him on what is in the building. 3. It was brought out that the water department does not like the connections drawn up in the detail for the backwater preventor. They want the meter to remain in the location where it presently exists and want the sketch revised to meet their requirement. DHDA to contact Hall Engineer to get this update and have them speak with the water dept. so that there is no confusion. If the existing meter can remain, that is fine,but we thought that the size of the incoming water changed in size which means that the water meter would have to change along with it. If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise, this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. September 25,2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Chris Bassett 0 Dolores Schreiner Jon Truslow Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Al Deluca Paul, super David Dunlap Purpose: Review the progress of the project and review owner's concern relative to the terrace,.housekeeping and project completion. Owner's Concerns , 1. The owner issued a memo releasing a number of items that need to be ordered ASAP in order to maintain the schedule: A. new showers B. sinks C. trench drain for patio J. Teixeira indicated that based on this memo these items have been ordered and Nauset will follow up to see that they are delivered in a timely fashion. Job super indicated that he had concerns relative to sheet rocking the showers but that he will deal with it when they arrive.. 2. Dolores pointed out that she is extremely concerned about getting back the administrative area in the building as it is causing problems with the staff. She is also concerned about a time table that would be energetic so she could get the spaces back including the dining room. A discussion ensued and Nauset indicated that they would be able to give her the space back in 2-3 weeks once they have they plumbing installed for the apartments above. 3. Utilization of the drives/walks/parking during the sitework, which is substantial: DHDA requested that a plan be developed and submitted to the owner for their review and comment. Plans should be marked up on a site plan or the next meeting. Job super was hoping they could use the church parking lot during this work. This needs to be approved. 4. DHDA brought to the attention of those in attendance that today is September 251h and that the project is supposed to.be completed by the end of the year and that there is a substantial amount of work that needs to be performed in cold weather. It is our assumption that you would want to get as much sitework out of the way now to eliminate frost conditions. Nauset agreed., 5. Chris Bassett stated that she does not want'the use of the facility to be damaged by the construction and that the plan must be comprehensive enough to not only allow the staff to come and go along Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: A. Completion date: 1/2/09 B. Sewage Treatment Plant: t 1. No damage noted. Stan and Tom of SS Design were on-site for the delivery and reviewed the entire package and watched it being set. 2. Those in attendance agreed that the plant will be on-line the second week of November. This will allow two weeks for testing. This time table has to be met. 3. It is Nauset's responsibility to see that the subcontractors involved'` respond in a timely manner and complete their contractual obligations. 4. DHDA questioned if the access opening in the roof was in the right location. Visually observing it, it appears that'it is not. J.,Truslow to contact the engineer to have them confirm the location of the opening. Care needs to be taken because the HVAC contractor is going to move the RTU at the same time. 2. Job Super's Look Ahead: This was provided to those in attendance. 3. Shop Drawings: - A. DHDA returned the lighting submittal at this meeting. This included the i the change that the interior designer requested. The GC brought up the. fact that recessed lighting cannot be used on the 1" floor due to the fact that the terrace does not allow enough space above the ceiling to tent the fixture and accommodate the height of the fixture. DHDA recommended that surface-mounted fixtures be used,on the P` floor,and appeared to be what the interior designer was requesting to begin with. B. Looking for submissions on: , 1. misc. metal 2. toilet room accessories 3. corner guards,kickplates, etc. 4. building signage 5. grates,ladders, catwalk, etc. for the sewage treatment plant 4. ASI: A. DHDA confirmed that they received ASI#43 and 45 which show the saddles for the plank. B. Vinyl Siding: Discussed that the trim was being put in place. The trim around the windows and horizontal belt looks good. It was confirmed that the corner boards will be metal clad and a "J" for the siding to frame into to finish off the edge of the siding. C. Asked about the fire extinguisher layout. Job super stated that the fire department has a copy of it. They,are waiting for approval 5. PCO: Reviewed a number of PCOs on showers, sinks, outdoor faucet, added cost to in-fill the masonry in the bearing wall. 6. Requisition: We reviewed the pencil requisition and found it can be approved as corrected. PM to overnight the revised requisition to DHDA for signature. Construction Phase During the walk-thru the following.was observed: 1. Framing of stud partitions is approx. 85% complete. 2. Rough wiring and plumbing ongoing. 3. Coring through the plank was reported to be complete. I 4. A problem with some steel at.the skylight prohibits coring of the steel. After a reviewing it was determined that the staff and resident bathrooms will be moved towards the existing building approximately 8-12". This will move the core.into a better location. 5. A venting issue was pointed out.relative to the existing building,which needs further study. 6. We walked through with the HVAC sub and made recommendations to•relocate ducts so that we can avoid interference with-the plumbing presently in place The changes revolve around relocating the RTU,.bringing the supply air into the new addition,running parallel with the existing masonry wall and then back feeding areas of,concern and bring the exhaust duct across the existing building 'to the bearing wall then traversing the building so it can back feed the spacds required. This appeared to be the most-cost effective way. 7. Pointed out rough wiring that was in place which is now upgraded from Romex. Nauset reported they did this to continue the work. If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please notify this office in writing within `4 ten day's receipt; otherwise, this-report shall stand as written. - David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates,Inc. a v David W. 0aireap o4j� dvciated, 9we. ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-PLANNERS 105 Webster Street, Units 1 &2 Hanover, MA 02339 EN (781)878-0066 FAX(781)878-7060 E-mail:david@dhdunlap.com September 29, 2008 Mr. Thomas Perry, Director Building Division Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Re: Cape Regency Assisted Living ,q'D Dear Mr. Perry: Thank you for meeting with me,the electrical engineer, GC and the owner's representative to review the issue relative to whether Cape Regency Assisted Living was the correct use for this facility. The owner's rep will provide you under separate cover a letter indicating how the assisted living will function relative to the residents' ability to egress the building. AS discussed when the residents age in place and are incapable of this function, they will be transferred to the nursing home which is capable of providing the type of care they will need. Based on the fact that we mutually agreed that this facility will be a mixed use,I-2 for the nursing home and R-2 for the assisted living, we have instructed the GC to proceed with completing the construction as originally depicted on the construction documents tiled with the building permit appiication. If we can provide you additional information on the assisted living project or its construction,please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely yours, ci q D VID H. DUNLAP OCIATES, INC. oC-) P"d I I — David H. Dunlap,Jr., NCARB,ARA President w y; — r cc: C. Bassett, T. Lavalle, T. Papantonis w r' r Ir s i David W. Oaaeap o4jdveiatea, 9me. ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-PLANNERS 105 Webster Street, Units 1 &2 Hanover, MA 02339 (781)878-0066 FAX(781)878-7060 E-mail:david@dhdunlap.com April 24, 2008 Mr. Thomas Perry, Director Building Division Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis,MA 02601 Re: Cape Regency Assisted Living �o�(� „� !�) U_� Dear Mr. Perry: Our office has compiled field reports from job meetings being held on a continuing basis at Cape Regency under Permit#B 20073078. This information is being provided to you for your records as required under controlled construction, Section 116.2.1 of the MSB, 780 CMR 61' Edition. Attached hereto are field reports for May I - 15:,2008 Per your request, attached hereto please find testing reports for your information. Sincerely yours, bVID H. DUNLAP SSOCIATES,IN David H. Dunlap,Jr., N R , ARAf President t a _ N C' va W tO r- oQ m ' f , May 1, 2008 CAPE REGENCY FIELD REPORT People Present: Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Al Deluca Kevin Scrima David Dunlap Weather: 55 degrees and sunny Purpose: Review the progress of construction. There were 17 workmen of various trades on-site. Nauset was having a meeting with the site contractor relative to scheduling. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: A. Nauset indicated that the project will be completed 12/26/08. B. Foundation work ongoing. C. 55 yards of concrete was poured on 4/25/08. Pour is scheduled for 5/2/08. D. See job super's look ahead. 2. Site Engineering: The site engineer was not at this job meeting; consequently, there was no feed back on this aspect of the project. 3. Testing: DHDA indicated that we had not received any testing reports from last week. We were advised that test results were forwarded. 1 4. Shop Drawings: A. Elevator: Returned to GC. B. Presently we care calling for a key switch at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd floor to eliminate residents leaving the floor. C. HM door frames are ready to be returned but we are waiting on the supplier to get back to us on a question we had. 5. PCO/CO: A. A PCO will be provided next week on the additional sitework required by the fire department and new patios added to the site. 6. ASI: A. DHDA is developing an ASI to confirm where the exterior water valves will be installed. 7. Interior Designer: Waiting for color selections. Construction Phase 1. Waterproofing for the basement has not been completed but will be done by 5/7/08. 2. Underground plumbing shown on the pencil requisition was for materials stored on-site,not installed. 3. Sediment control barriers have not been repaired and reset as requested at last week's meeting. 4. Delivery of steel is scheduled for 5/12/08. Logistics were worked about between the GC and sub. We also reviewed the questions raised by the steel fabricator, which have been redundant and many times answered by the construction documents. 5. A question on the steel beam in the elevator shaft is noted on the elevator drawings which were returned. 6. There has been no reported interference with the operations. 7. GC advised that there have been there have been no parking issues. Next meeting is scheduled for May 8, 2008. If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing. David H:Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates;Inc. Ir May 15, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow Jon Teixeira Jim Goulet Al Deluca Kevin Scrima David Dunap Purpose: Review the progress of project. Weather: 55 degrees, sunny Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: A. Nauset confirmed that the project is on schedule for completion on 12/26/08. B. Foundation contractor is approximately 90% complete. Final pour of foundations and piers is schedule for May 6cn C. Minimal additional sitework has taken place. Need more siteworkers. D. Job super's look ahead: See attached. 2. Site Engineering: Site Engineer was not at meeting;no update. 3. Shop Drawings: A. Returned: Colors for elevator cab have been returned. B. Completion of the e-Call manufacturer selection. DHDA to set up meeting. C. Being Reviewed: 1. Armstrong Safeguard Spa: sent to interior designer for review 2. Daltile Quarry Tile: sent to interior designer for review 3. American Olean Vallano Tile: sent to interior designer for review. 4. PCO: A. J. Teixeira is working on PCO for rebar in foundation and organic soil removal. f 5. ASI: A. Nauset indicated that they received ASIs#12 and #13 which deal with changes requested by the interior designer. B. GC requested additional information on the new washer dryer area and. relocation of the housekeeping area shown on an ASI previously provided. Construction Phase 1. There have been no problems with construction interfering with the operations. 2. There have been no reported parking issues. Signs are on-site to show the change in traffic which will be required when the steel crane sets up for installing the structural steel which will take about 1 month. 3. Next concrete pour is scheduled for May 191h. 4. Structural steel is scheduled for delivery on May 27th. 5. Jim Goulet reported that concrete nuggets(!) are being encountered during excavation. Evidently, this was left over from the initial construction. He stated that he does not feel this is Nauset's responsibility. Walk-Thru with Tob Super 1. We reviewed the outside concrete work. 2. The underground in the garage area has been completed. 3. The sump has been installed as designed. 4. Sub-grade in the garage area has been brought up to the underside of the insulation. 5. Compaction tests have been taken. DHDA has not received testing reports for the past three weeks. We advised UTS and the on-site inspector. 6. `Concrete foundation walls have been poured and are set in and around the WWTP. 7. We went inside to review the two foundations set in the basement of the one- story addition. They are dug out and ready to be formed and rebar set. Concrete slab has been removed and is outside. Super indicated that this work will be done ASAP so that it can be backfilled and the concrete floor back in place. Then columns will have to be run to the roof. 8. We went to the 1" and 2nd floor to review temporary partitions which have been set in place so that the work can commence. 9. Additional roof membrane was being installed to make sure that the roof stays tight. 10. The office trailer has been relocated to the patio at the rear. 11. GC to provide two prices for the new patio: bituminous and concrete. DHDA to provide another sketch to J. Teixeira. Next meeting is scheduled for May 22, 2008. If anyone has additions and/or corrections,please notify this office. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. f Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing PeopW -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/29/2008 Report No. 6 David Dunlap Associates , Inc . Job Number 11570 Attn : David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervi l_. 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Sample Submitted By ;v� — Sample No. . 58 Our Representative: warren Wright Date Submitted: 02 2 7/08 ❑ Other: Source of Sample 0 On-Site Existing @ location: North of existing building ❑ Off-Site Borrow from: Proposed Use: Back f i 11 Material Submitted As: 0 Structural/Granular Fill: ❑❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.01 .0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) Gravel Borrow: MHD M1 .03 .0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1 .03 .1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.0 .0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1 .11 .0 ❑ Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01 .0 ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01.; ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: ❑ Other: Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ❑X Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer 0 Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability 0 Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification:Silty sand with gravel Project Specification Conformance Result ❑ Does conform: ❑ Does NOT conform: ❑ Marginally does not*conform...Basis: 0 " We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechnica.l. Department Dur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at it .. o• Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People- it Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/29/2008 Report No. 6 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11.670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape RegencyHealthcare Cur. ,Centervi.11 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nausea construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Trash.,- Nauset Construction Corp. a_c1n. John Teixeira , ■ UITS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap_Assoc. Report Date 02/29%2008 Attr.: David Dunlap Report No. o 105: Webster. Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanove?', MA 02339- 1-227 Project Cape, Regency Healthc --�e Ctr Ce nt.erv;1 1 e Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report " C " EGG 8G 3070 I ; . I I w FG Z — is I Z 50 I W w ,G 30 ----L.. 20 I . 500 t 00 10 -1 0 01 GRAIN SIZE-mm o oo? %COBBLES _%GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 00 I _;- - 029 SIEVE PERCENT I SPEC! PASS? Material Description SIZE F'rNEF PERCENT (X=NO) r i•1 SAND SO,11 Sit LITTLE GRAVEL ilt 100.0 I in 3 4 itt_ I 9i.9 3%8 in. sq 5 j Atterbero Limits s;4 I Ad.6 PL= LL= PI= -10 Sri 5 i 1 ��'20 68.6 ; Coefficients 40 53.5 D85= 5.1 1 DBO= 0.567 D 0.36; 50 45 50= =100 6 C30= 0.125 D15= D10= ='U0 =I.? u Cc= Classification USCS= S:Nd AASHTO= Remarks I I ir.o Sprcil'I�aUull nm..iJc'�I) - - Sample No.: 3 Source of Sample: VC1RTk OF I-XIST. Date: RLDG. . Location: - Elev./Depth: UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. i Client: N.A S 1 CONSTRUCTION Project:ect (-APFRFCFN ) i IF, ,HC R,r.C5 Richardson Lane N11.. Stoneham, MA 02180 I ---- Project No: 11670 Finuro ,u UTS of Massachusetts, inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, 1nC. Report Date 02/29i2008 Attn : David Dunlap Report No. o 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Job Number 1i 70 Hanover, MA. 02339- 1227 Project Ca3e Reency Healthcare Ctr. ,`enr_�ri I. Attachment COMPACTION TEST REPORT Curve No.:58 FROemarki: No.: 1 1670 Date: 02-29-2008 CAPE.R€GENCY HEALTH CARE CNTR.-CENTERVIL[.F,VA : th: Sample No. 58 VORTH OF EXIST.3[.DG. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Description: F-Il SAND S01ME S([,T[.ITTLE GRAVEL. Mass ific ations- ' USCS: AASHTO: Nat.Moist. = Liquid Limit= Plasticity Index= %>No.4= I i,}46 %<No.200= 21.7 40 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS ------- UNCORR_ECTED Maximum dn;densirti- I :i.' f —'Pc 138.9 pcf Optimum moisture=6.0 . ?.0"o 140 Test specification: ` ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure A`Modified Oversize correction applied to each point 1301 120 100%SATURATION CURVES FOR SPEC, GRAV EQUAL TJ _.. 2.8 27 a 110 2.6 N 1 1 o -i II 100 i 90 I l 80 - i 70 I — - i 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Water content. % ` 4. Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing People- Page 1 '5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/27/2008 Report No. 5 David Dunlap Associates, TnC Job Number 11-670 Attn• David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ;Centerville 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339- 1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Sample Submitted Bv Sample No. 35 ❑X Our Representative: Len Crabtree Date Submitted 02/15j08 Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: 0 Off-Site Borrow from: PA Landers, 1/2° sashed crushed stone Proposed Use: Below septic System Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.0.1.o (Shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1. 03 .o Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1 .03.1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04 .0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1.11 .o ❑ Crushed Stone: MHD M2.0i .o ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.of`7 ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: Other: washed stone Requested Testing ❑ . Atterberg Limits ❑X Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability a Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: 1/2" crushed washed stone Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: ❑ Does NOT conform: ❑ Marginally does not"conform...Basis: We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. ❑ No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ ' Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechnica i. Department Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts ®Thee Construction Testing People- Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/27/2008 Report No. 5 David Dunlap Associates, inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management. Svcs. Inc,. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construct;on Corp-Attn: John Teixeira t e 'UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. 'age 3 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) David. Dunlap As Inc. Report Date 02/27/2008 Attn: David. Dunlap Report No. 5 105 Webster :Street , Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, KA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr: ,Centerville Attachment FPa Report Size Distribution Re ort 00 j ac Z 60 I ! _ Z 50 i U j a '0 30 2 C I. 0 ----------------------- 500 100 10 .,�.. - 1 0.1 0,01OA01 COBBLES /,GRAVEL GRAIN SIZE-mm O.O -- - — %SAND I %SILT %CLAY s s 12.2 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC." PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT I Material Description (X=NO) V2"CRUSHFD WASHED STONE 34 in. 100.0 I I i2 in. 99 6 �4 18 0 5 ( PL= LL=Atterbe_ rg_Limits 0.3 4'16 I + P1= Coefficients D85= 10.6 1560= 8.11 D50= 7.3 5 D30= 5.99 D15= 4.97 D10= A.16 Cu= 1.95 Cc= 1.06 Classification EI USCS= AASHTO= I I Remarks A.ASH1'0 1�11-91 PROCEDURE,A 1 HE PERCENT F)\,IiIZ T1[AN THE NO.200 SIEVE IS 0.4&0. I (no<pcalica!irm prpvidcJt �__ Sample No.: 3 Source of Sample: Location: A LINDFRS; I!2" WASHED Date: Elev./Depth: UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. Client: NIA(1S1-:fCONS1RUCllO\ ' - 5 Richardson Lane Project: CAPF.REOENc)-(;ENTrRvil_LE.,NI.A ' I Stoneham, MA 02180 I i ---- ------ �I.Project No: Figure 3-5, Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/27/2008 Report No. 4 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Ir1c . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Sample Submitted By Sample NO. 33 .F Our Representative: Len Crabtree Date Submitted: 02/15/08 Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: Off-Site Borrow from: FA Landers, 1 1/2" crushed ,gashed Proposed Use: Below septic system Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD Ml-01 .0 (shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1 .03.0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1.03.1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1 .04.0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1.11.0 ❑ Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01 .o ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01.7 ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: Q Other: Washed stone Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits Q Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability 0 Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: 1 1/2 " crushed washed stone Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: ❑ , Does NOT conform: ❑ Marginally does not;conform...Basis: We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. E No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechni.cal Department Our reports .are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham; MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date •02/27/2008 Report No. 4 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. Centerd11-te Attn : David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339- 1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Cc: Radius Management Svcs. inc. Attn: Jon Truslo;e Nauset Construction Corp Attn: John Teixeira r r UITS of Massachusetts, inc. rage 3 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 021.80 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, .Inc. Report 02/2l Attu: p /2008 uavid Dunlap Report No. 105 Webster Street, Suite-2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA. 02339-122'7 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Center,,, IJe Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report 100 pia la 90 j 11, 80 — I .I t 70 I W 60 LL Z 50, ` i I ' aW. °° 30 1 .. 20 10 I jI I III fa 0 ( ( I• q 500 100 - 10 GRAIN SIZE-mm 0.01 o 001 COBBLES j %GRAVEL 0.0 -- _ �o SAND %SILT j I CLAY SIEVE__[ PERCENT SPEC.' PASS? SIZE FINER I PERCENT Material Description _ (X=NO), 1 1-2"CRUSHED!SHED WASHED STONE 1.5 in. !00.0 1.25 in. I 97.7 1 in. 75-5 314 in. 19.9 Atterbera Limits 3;8 in. Ii 0. .6 PL= LL= P1= Coefficients D85-_ 27.3 D60= 23.3 D50= 22.3 D30= 20.2 D15= 17.1 010= I .d Cu= 1.52 Cc= 1.14 f Classification USCS= AASHTO= Remarks If AASHTO T 11-95 PROCEDURE A THft PERCEUT FI\:ER j I THAN THE NO 200 SIEVE IS{ 1%. l (nn>PecifiiaUrmhrocided Sample No.: 13 Source of Sample: PA LANDERS, 1 1.2!'VV'ASHEb Date: 72004Location: - Elev./Depth: i UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC ; Client: ;.aUf l cO`siRucTlw - I S Richardson Lane Project: ('.APE REGE\C-Y-CEv(LRvli.I t•IA Stoneham, MA 02180�L__ __.-- Project No: Figure i t Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 'Report No. 3 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction. Sample Submitted By Sample No. 937 Our Representative: Ned Callahan Date Submitted: 01/02/08 Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: 0 Off-Site Borrow from: 3/4° washed stone Proposed Use: Backfi11 per -drawings Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.01.0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD Ml .03.0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1.03.l ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1.11.0 M Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01.0 - ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01.7 ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: ❑ Other: Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ❑X Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability ❑ Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: crushed stone Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: 0 Does NOT conform: MHD M2.01.4 for 3/4" crushed stone, percent passing the 3/4" sieve is low by 3.90 ❑ Marginally does not*conform...Basis: "We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. ❑ No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: tEVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department )ur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. 4 Ot Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira l UTS.of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 01/07/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 3 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 .lob Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report 100 � i so � � R I � , i ao 70 i I i II i W ho i Z _ . Z 50 LU � I d 40 - :• - 30 I: 20 10 i 0 �. 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 _ .0.001 GRAIN SIZE-mm %MO.0 LES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 98.5 1.5 SIEVE PERCENT I SPEC." PASS? Material Descrlotion SIZE I FINER PERCENT ! (X=NO) CRUSHED STONE 1 in. 100.0 3/4 in. 86.1 lit in. 12.1 3!8 in. 2.5 ;4 1.5 Atterberg Limits PL= LL= PI= Coefficients D85= 18.9 D60= 16.4 D50= 15.7 D30= 14.2 D15= 13.0 D10= 11.9 Cu= 1.38 Cc= 1.03 Classification USCS= AASHTO= Remarks i Ino vccificalion pro%idcdj Sample No.: 937 Source.of Sample: 3/4"WASHED STONE Date: `01-07-2008 Location: Elev./Depth: UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. 'i Client: NAUSETCONSTRUCTION Project: CAPE REGENCY-c'EN'rF:RVILLE,NlA 5 Richardson Lane Stoneham, MA 02180 j Project No: figure 9�7 9' f Massachusetts "The Construction Testing People- Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham; MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax.) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date n ; Report No. 2 _ Job Number _1 0 7 Da u Attu . David Duri I ap Project105 Webster .S,_reet E,aite Ha.pO'.rer, ✓iF_ 02 -�227 Contractor -- ro,1s E_u c-- Sam le Submitted B Sample No. 935 Our Representative: _,;;e,u Other: Date Submitted: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: 0 Off-Site Borrow from: _ _ _ sashed S_on Proposed Use: Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Gra nular Fill: _ ❑ Ordinary Borrow: M!HD _, , r, ❑ Gravel Borrow: M^1 J ,, �'_u• - c v _ P - r ssed Gravel For Base :s e Cours e: � ._ , ❑ Sand Borrow: ",�',,, ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: 0 Crushed Stone: ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: -,L'L' 5_ ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: H Other: Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits X Gradation r- LJ Analysis ❑ Hydrometer LJ_ Miodified Proctor (_j Permeability ❑ Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: crushed stone Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: Does NOT conform: _ .. _ /-, =! Marginally does not conform...Basis: J - We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. �!---1� No Specifications provided to our office. I� Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. Li Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. ;ENERAL REMARKS: :VIEWED BY. Imo_ 9` Of Massachusetts The Construction Testiing People- - Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA -0218-0 7$1.438_7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing results - Transmittal Report Report Date o i u7;'200o Report No. 2 E)a D„n 11 _ . _ Job Number i 1 S-iG n �� r. Sv cg : r - t A Lid : DaviCl Dun1 p Project rape g 105 rriebst c- __ -c= _- ---= _ = S�u�1 2 �-ianovcr 1vA U23 9- j Contractor .-a;_a-= _ . - -� cc: �a6tuS Jon T­­ :._�i.. 7G_ie UTC of Ma ��,, S��t iU0t:;ttZ:�, inc. 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Page 3 17 Report Date 0.- v3ebs, ,- Report No. Job Number ` Proiect Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report 'G( W 60 f Z LU Z SOI , Ii +~ II 2001 i �— GP,AIN SIZE-mm '`1 cuo I—%COBBLES ( - -_--_ ... "a GRAVEL i 0 Q �' %SAND /c SILT io CLAY f SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' PASS? S"E FINER I PERCENT Material Descri tion I =+n. .i R! SHFI) STCi\E I n qr.0 �i 119. . I I I Atterber I I ; FL= --omits LL= Piz Coefficients I D30 D17= 2(,.-t Do6 I G 3- Lill 10= C C- Classification USCS- I ! i + I AASH`O= ! I Remarks I I i I I ►Sample No — Source of Sample: I i^'} ocat on _ 7i:i1 S l rj Data +� I: UTS GE 1IMASSACHUSETTS I ciev.;Dep+r NC. it Client: 5 Richardson Lane Project ! Stoneham, MA 02180 Project No + 4 Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 7.81-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 1 David' Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Sample Submitted By Sample No. 935 Our Representative: Ned Callahan Date Submitted: 01/02/08 Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: 0 Off-Site Borrow from: • PA Landers - Masphee Proposed Use: Structural fill Material Submitted As: n Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.01.0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) • ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1.03.0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD Ml.03.1 ❑ .Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD Ml.11.0 ❑ Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01.0 ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01.7 ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: ❑ Other: Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ❑X Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability ❑ Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: Gray gravel and sand Project Specification Conformance Results Does conform: 02200-4, 2.00 A for structural fill ❑ Does NOT conform: ❑ Marginally does not'conform...Basis: We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. ❑ No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. 3ENERALREMARKS: EVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department - ur reports are available.in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. t Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover,. MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Trusl.ow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 01/07/2008 Attn: ' David Dunlap Report No. 1 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover—MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report 100 90 L-- - 80 i 70 iCr 6G - LL — } Z 50 w U I 30 i 20 10 0 i iI i I , 500 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE-mm COBBLES %GRAVEL ?/o SAND %SILT %CLAY 0.0 1 53.2 1 37.0 9.8 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' PASS? Material Description SIZE I FINER PERCENT (X=NO) F-GRAVEL AND SAND TRACE SILT 3/4 in. 100.0 3/8 in. 67.3 94 46.8 910 33.4 #_7)0 2 4,1 Atterbera Limits >40 18.8 I PL= LL= P1= =50 16.2 IOU 12.4 Coefficients 4200 9.8 1 D85= 14.1 D60= 7.79 D50= 5.47 D30= I.50 D15= 0.250 D10= 0.0794 Cu= 97.99 Cc= 3.66 I 1 I Classification i USCS= GP-GM AASHTO= IRemarks 010 spcciric:Won pro6cla) _ Sample No.: 935 Source of Sample: PA LANDERS-MASHPHFE Date: 01-07-2008 Location: --- Elev./Depth: UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC.^ Client: NAUSET CONS]RUCTION -- S Richardson Lane Project: CAPE,REGENCY-CENTERVILLE.I`IA _Stoneham, MA 02180 Pro'ect No: Fiiqure y UTS,of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 01/07/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 1 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment COMPACTION TEST REPORT Curve No.:935 Project No.: Date: 01-07-2008 Project: CAPE REGENCY-CENTERVILLE.MA Location: Elev.tDepth: Sample No. 935 Remarks: PA LANDERS-MASPHEE MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Description: F-GRAVEL.AND SAND TRACE SILT Classifications- USCS: GP-GM AASHTO: Nat.Moist.= I Sp.G.= 2.75 Liquid Limit= Plasticity Index= >3/4 in.= 0.0% %<No.200= 9.8% _ ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED Maximum dry,density= 129.8 pcf 129.8pcf Optimum moisture=3.2°o 8.')ono 140 Test specification: ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure C Modified Oversize correction applied to each point 130 120 100%SATURATION CURVES ., FOR SPEC.GRA.V.EQUAL TO: 28 I 2.7 a 110 2.6 C N 0 100 i 80 i i. 70 - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 . 4e Water content, % Figure o 5 UTS of Massachusetts,Inc. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Concrete Field Report Report Date 04/28/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset.Construction WEATHER: .TIME: CONTACT: SUMMARY: Transported one' set of cylinders cast on 04/25/08 to the lab for testing. GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time Helio Monteiro No REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko ti Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People- Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Concrete Field Report Report Date 04/16/2008 Report No. 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: .TIME: CONTACT: SUMMARY: Transported two sets of cylinders cast on 04/14/08 to the lab for testing. GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time , L. Villani No REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports®utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing PeepW -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Concrete'Field Report Report Date 03/31/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: ,TIME: CONTACT: SUMMARY: Transported two sets of cylinders cast on 03/28/08 to the lab for testing. , GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time L. Villani No REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing Feolple' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 05/06/2008 Report No. 21 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Sunny, 65-72 degrees ,TIME: 10 :30 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, IT75 mini excavator, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test , Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction. Location (Feet) 1 4.7 133.7 131.0 98.0 See sketch -14' 2 4.4 133.7 132.0 98.7 " -13' 3 4.4 133.7 132.E 99.2 " -13' 4 4.2 133.7 131.7 98.5 " -12' 5 6.7 132.6 130.2 98.2 Floor slab base 6 6.5 132.6 130.7 98.6 " OBSERVATIONS: The following was observed: The areas around the elevator pit inside the foundation walls-were being backfilled and compacted. Onsite gravel was used for the lifts up to an. elevation of minus 12 feet (-12) Dense grade gravel was used for the final lift. Six density tests were performed using a sand cone in accordance with ASTM D1556. All test results exceeded 980 of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. CC: Radius Management, Svcs. Inc- Attn:'Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 05/06/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 21 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment o � ) s �? A m y 0 1 �. i n M o C) > Z m s® Z.7J la I _ r I it ° Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) SOII Inspection Report Report Date 04/25/2008 Report No. 20 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite . 2. Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Sunny, 41-62 degrees .TIME: 6 :3 0 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: Excavator, .Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑M Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 6.2 132.6 130.2 98.2 See sketch -12.3' 2 6.0 132.6 130.9 98.7 " 3 5.8 1.32.6 131.5 99.2 " 4 5.4 132.6 131.1 98.9 " OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: A final lift with processed gravel was placed and compacted at the south wall of the Wastewater Treatment Facility. Four density tests were performed using a sand cone in accordance with ASTM D1556. Test results exceeded 98% of the modified proctor per ASTM.D1557. . These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day+1 Hrs OT 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Ris-hardssn Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/25/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 20 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 .lob Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment Rp. OF 10: 48p P. 10 7 _-r4m I L L i = i r ti Of Massachusetts ��The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) SOII Inspection Report Report Date 04/24/2008 Report No. 19 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Sunny, 62-75 degrees TIME: 6 :30 AM CONTACT: Al .DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320 excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.2 133.7 131.3 98.2 See sketch -14.0' ' 2 4.8 133.7 132.1 98.8 " -15.5' 3 4.8 133.7 131.0 98.0 " -15.0' 4 5.3 133.7 131.6 98.5 -14.5' OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Backfilling along the west side of the Wastewater Treatment Facility and at footing elevation between 2- 'line and 4-line has started. Four density tests were performed using a sand cone according to ASTM D1556. All four tests exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor ASTM D1557. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering . Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/24/2008 Attn: David Dunlap - Report No. 19 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment 08 10:47p p.7 JcI _ I I�_ i IR �1 Z I c- r O i Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 04/23/2008 Report No. 18 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc.. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Sunny, 47-72 degrees .TIME:. 7 :00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320 excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.2 133.7 131.2 98.1 See sketch -15.7' 2 5.2 133.7 132.5 99.1 -15.7' 3 4.7 133.7 131.7 98.5 4 4.5 133.7 131.0 98.0 -14.5' 5 4.8 133.7 132.0 98.7 -14.0' OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Backfilling along the south side of the Wastewater Treatment Facility has started. Onsite fill is being. used. A total of five density tests were performed using a sand cone according to ASTM D1556. All test results exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor ASTM D1557. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports .are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira } Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Cane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/23/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 18 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment l8 10: 46p p 4 77 z 1 --fe. 'T r U s Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' page 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) SOII Inspection Report Report Date 04/22/2008 Report No. 17 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Sunny, 43-62 degrees TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.2 133.7 131.3 98.2 See sketch -14' 2 5.2 133.7 132.8 99.3 " -13" 3 416 133.7 131.6 1 98.4 -13' 4 4.6 133.7 132.1 98.8 -13' OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The _following was observed: Backfilling along the outside perimeter of the Wastewater Treatment Facility was completed today. A total of four density tests.were performed using a sand cone in accordance with ASTM D1556. All four tests exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor ASTM D1557. Rebar inspection for foundation walls was also performed today for work in progress on C-line from 5-6 line and 5 line (from C to C.1 line) . These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People- Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) F SOII Inspection Report Report Date 04/22/2008 Report No. 17 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cC: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of.Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/22/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 17 105 Webster. Street, Suite 2 Job-Number _11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment 08 10. 01p p. 15 D > 0. Vu a i j n r � I T ° Of Massachusetts .'The Construction Testing People' Page 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 04/17/2008 Report No. 16 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape. Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn : David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Sunny, 57-66 degrees TIME: 10 :30 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.4 133.7 133.3 99.7 See sketch -16' ! 2 5.4 133.7 131.4 98.3 -15' 3 5.2 133.7 132.0 98.7 OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Backfilling along the outside wall of C-line from 6-line to 9-line was being performed today. A total of three density tests were performed by sand cone method in accordance with.ASTM D1556. All three tests exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor ASTM D1557. These observations were related ,to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium. Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John 'Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko 1 , UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/17/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 16 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 .lob Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment HPr 08 09:57P P.g v I y -- ram; n= F- _ I iL ' Of Massachusetts '-'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 04/18/2008 Report No. 15 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Sunny, 40-65 degrees TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.1 133.7 132.2 98.9 See sketch _16' 2 4.4 133.7 131.6 98.4 -15' 3 4.8 133.7 132.5 99.1 " 14' OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. the following was observed: Backfilling along the outside walls of the Waste Treatment Facility has started. a total of three ,density tesets were performeed.using a sand cone in accordance with ASTm D1556. All three tests exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor ASTM D1557. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko. Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Ricliardson:lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/18/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 15 105 Webster Street, - Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.-, Centervil Attachment 00 05: 08a p. 4 J ' D i r.r l O + i II e f r i i p A J ? I .T, n A 51 Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection,Report Report Date 04/09/2008 Report No. 14 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Cloudy, 56 degrees .TIME: 12 : 00 PM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavators, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation' No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 4.3 133.7 131.3 98.2 See sketch Bottom of footing 2 4.2 133.7 132.0 98.7 3 4.0 133.7 J::�:l32.4 99.0 4 4.0 133.7 131.7 98.5 " OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: 1. Footing excavation on G-line and 9-line was completed. A total of four density tests .were performed by ,sand cone method according to ASTM D1556. Test results exceeded 95% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. # Excavation along G-line, 9-line and 10-line is in progress. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko JJTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5.Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice).781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/09/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 14 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project . Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment 'Rpr 1'1' 08 05:35a P 9 As � o N r f C LA Z j % i --n -} m j r I - i i Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) SOII Inspection Report Report Date 04/02/20F08 Report No. 13 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Sunny, 39-56 degrees TIME: 6 :30 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑X Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 7.4 133.7 131.4 98.3 D & 7 line Bottom of footing 2 7.7 133.7 131.0 98.0 E & 7 line 3 7.2 133.7 132.1 98.8 D & 8 line 4 7.2 133.7 133.0 99.5 E & 8 line 5 7.0 133.7 132.4 99.0 E & 9 line 6 7.0 133.7 132.6 99.2 D & 9 line OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Interior footings on D-line and E-line were excavated and compacted. A total of six compaction tests were performed using a sand cone in accordance with ASTM D1556. All six tests exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. Excavation along G-line, 9-line and 10-line is in progress. rhese observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J.-Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via ,email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. I Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 04/02/2008 Report No. 13 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . 0 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of. Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/02/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 13 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA d2339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment Rrr 07 08F09: 1Op p 4 311 ® 7 Cs f I - ;p 5 mJZ ® j (Irrr I f i j r Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7.755(-Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil.Inspection Report Report Date 03/28/2008 Report No. 12 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset construction WEATHER: Cloudy, 41 degrees .TIME: 6: 30 AM CONTACT:Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: © Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.9 133.7 132.3 99.0 See sketch Bottom of footing 2 5.9 133.7 132.8 99.3' " 3 5.6 133.7 131.E 98.4 " 4 5.6 133.7 132.0 98.7 " OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Footing excavation is continuing along 6-line and G-line. Four coompa,ction tests' were performed in accordance with ASTM D1556 using the sand cone method. All test results exceeded 98% of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. Eighty yards of concrete were placed in the Treatment Facility slab and C- line footings. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko I` _ I UTS_of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/28/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report NO. 12 105 Webster 'Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment - Mar 31 00 04:50a P ' 3 �s � J yco Ln 1n N N ON a > w f/ D I� is y% ;t1 � \ i 7 / .`S� 0 ° ;-Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,-Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781--438-6216 (Fax) Soil lnspection,Report Report Date 03/27/2008 Report No. 11 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Partly cloudy, 31-45 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT:Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field densitytests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat Plate compactor TEST METHOD: ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.8 133.7 131.3 98.2 See sketch Floor slab base 2 5.4 133.7 132.2 98.9 " 3 5.9 133.7 131.7 98.511 " OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Footing excavation is continuing along 6-line and G-line. The south end of the Wastewater Treatment Plant had to be re-graded and compacted. Three compaction tests were performed using the sand cone method in accordance with ASTM D1556. Testing results were in excess of 980 of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. These observations and test results were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. F spector Premium Travel me Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts `The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/27/2008 Report No. 11 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko l UT$_.of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/27/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 11 105 Webste-r .Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Mar 31 08 04:49a p-4 J � . J r /J `1 � N J A m fi 7 O l Z aN 1 , V� L 71 C_. m A r _Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 .5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/24/2008 Report No. 10 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervilie Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Sunny, 27-45 deqrees TIME: 6 : 30 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nausea Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate .compactor TEST METHOD: ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 5.7 133.7 131.6 98.4 See sketch -17' - 5.4 133.7 131.2 98.1 " 3 5.4 133.7 132.3 99.0 " OBSERVATIONS: he pt.irno.Se of this visit was tr, observe sniff nperntinng and perform field density tests asnece.s.sary 'he following was observed: ;xcess fill is being removed from the building pad area between D-line and G-line. A section of 3- ine to 6-1ine was excavated and compacted and three compaction tests were performed using the sand one method according to ASTM D1556. All test results exceeded 95% compaction of the modified proctor er ASTM D1557. ebar is being installed along C-line from 6-line to 9-line. hese observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. ispector Premium Travel lame Time Hours Time .- Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) EVIEWED-BY: Chuck Fraser (11 C ur reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/24/2008 Report No. 10 Job Number 1-167 0 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn : David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szc'zurko Engineering Attn: Star. Szczurko s L r, N ro ro N O o o L N \ t0 O ..._— M Q Z E O O Z d IZ CL Q u Q. o � u� N r` 00 r; co O U C) N c U l Jj a ru (n r 1 11. \ r N �:3 N .IJ (n CV .. �. N u a 4J M V No co (D r o `" —_ `J 5 Richardson Lane C (0 r- S-i CV n -- K ) -) ( Stoneham,Ma02160 JOB NAME: CgQF E6�.elc_' qp ;"lor.� FIELD N c O a N '� a of Md„�,`,',�1� "The Construction T�esfing peop le'- ` -, cu C ., _.--- --- -- PROJECT NQ: ---`1 a� CL�CTr�I..� 4J c E o a ro n O .� E .. > c to r o J_j n '( rt -u o r7 L n < Q Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5-Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/21/2008 Report No. g Job Number 1167.0 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Sunny, 30-41 degrees .TIME: 7 : 30 AM CONTACT: A1 DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑ Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 6.7 132.6 132.2 99.7 See sketch Bottom of footing 2 7.0 132.6 130.2 98.2 3 7.2 132.E 131.0 98.8 " 9 7.2 132.6 131.4 99.1' 5 6.8 132.E 130.9 98.7 " OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: .Plumbing pipes were being installed in the Wastewater Treatment Facility between A-line and C-line.. The excavated footings from 6-line to 9-line along C-line became saturated from yesterday's rain. The saturated sections were removed and replaced with dry processed gravel. The area was re-compacted and five compaction tests were performed using a sand cone according to ASTM D1556. All five tests exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. Soil and gravel continued to be removed between C-line and G-line. These observations and test results were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED'BY: Chuck Fraser Our.reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. / Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson.Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/21/2008 Report No. 9 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap ASSOClateS, Inc. Attn: David Dunlap project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction . cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS- -of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice):781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/21/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 9 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Mar 23 08 05: 28p p. 16 : Cn cn 7 T 00 n d• I d r Q l O m m Z A I k 6t C \ w� ,u o� rn r— C � , Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page l 5-Richardson-Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/20/2008 Report No. 8 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 0 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Rain, 41-45 degrees TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ❑ Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 6.6 133.7 132.0 98.7 See sketch -16' 2 6.3 133.7 131.3 98.2 -15' OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necesary. The following was observed: Only limited site work was being performed today because of the wet gravel conditions. The elevator pad was backfilled and compacted with onsite gravel. Two compaction tests were performed according to ASTM D1556 using a sand cone. Test results exceeded 95% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. 'Grocer No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser r1✓ l� 1 Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5_Rich ardson-Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/20/2008 Report No. 8 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko ■ UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5`9ichardlson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/20/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 8 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Mar 23 08 05: 27p p. 10 � J 1 f 5G l n a i 7 r i _ 00n �io ! _rL- I\ y Z A � H it `^y O CO / n D z Z O h T J d C `^ I J D T( ^ -� mr rXI n m r Xx Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/18/2008 Report No. 7 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, lrlc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construct]-.on WEATHER: Sunny, 29-41 deqrees TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: © Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer 7Maximum Field 7TestTPercent Dry PercentElevation Moisture Density. Compaction Location (Feet) 7.0 131.i 98.9 See sketch -16.0' 7.8 132.6 130.6 98.5 6.9 i32.6 130.9 98.7 -13.0' )BSERVATIONS: - pi?roose of this Visit to observe s -ni.l operations and -rfcr , field Ccnsi tnecessary. - �-_Y' eJ J 4.. -...- ollowing was observed: Oiling excavation is continuing on C-line and D-line from 9-line to 10-line. After the area was xcavated, processed gravel was placed in six, inch compacted lifts to produce a step footing. Three ompaction tests were performed by the sand cone method according to ASTM D1556. , Test -results exceeded D`� compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. Excess material is being removed from the ilding pad area. use observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. spector Premium Travel 3me Time Hours Time Grocer No Mai: Day 3 Hr(s) VIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser r reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius i-?anageaent Svcs. 1r,c. Attn: Jon -rruslow I'I laser cnmst,1, 1,i— r'rn, r UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 ki.chardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Dav, .d., Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/18/2008 David. Dunlap Report No. 7 1.05 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11070 11-fa lo`'er, MP, 02339-122% Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Ma^ (18 04: 16a p.6 � I i c i r � ro r o _ f y %• T Z C' .� l C Of Massachusetts 4 . "The Construction Testing People- -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/17/2008 Report No, 6 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape -Regency Heal thcare. Ctr. ,Centerville Attn : David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Partly cloudy, 28-39 degrees TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction 'URPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests -QUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor rEST METHOD. ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer FITLE: ❑ Inspector' ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field rest Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation Vo. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 6.7 129.8 128.1 98.7 See sketch -17.5' 6.5 129.8 128.6 99.1. .5 129.8 127.5 98. r -17.0' 6.3 129.8 128.0 98.6 6.4 129.8 127.7 98.4 -16.5' 7.4 132.6 '_30.6 98.- -16.8' 7 13' 31 2 l.o 9 BS ERVATIONS: he purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. -le .fcliowing was observed: -line- was over-excavated to remove unsuitable i11 high in organic material. it was backfilled in six lch compacted lifts with dense grade and structural processed gravael. Seven compaction tests were '-rfformed using a sand cone in accordance with ASTM D1556. The first five tests were, performed on the 'nse grade fill and the last two tests were performed on the processed gravel. All seven tests seeded 989; compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. The proctor for the last two tests was ovided by P. A. Landers who supplied the gravel. ese observations l-Jere 'related, tc Hr. DeLuca 'prior to departure. Spector Premium Travel me Time Hours Time Grocer a Ma- Day 3 fir(s) VIEWED BY: (-huc k Fraser w r Of Massachusetts 3 "The Construction Testing People` Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/17/2008 Report No. 6 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency 1lealthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Inc.ana ement Svcs. 9Attn: .Jon 71ruslow Nausez Construction Corp. Attu: Jove Teixeira i r UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) ?avid Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/17/2008 ,n r-tn: D a v i d Duniap Report No. 6 :-05 Webster street, Suite 2 Job Number _l670 i4anove.r, ,',iA 02339-1227 Project 1 Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. . ,Centerville Attachment M " 08 04: 14a p. 3 Jac, -4/ -- C�> � t r.v i UJ I n > r. i ( r Of Massachusetts The (construction Testing People' -Page 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180-781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/14/2008 Report No. 5 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Partly cloudy, 35-40 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320 excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD.: ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.2 133.7 131.5 98.4 See sketch Base of slab 2 .5.4 133.7 130.5 97.6 " 3 4.8 133.7 129.4 96.8 " OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Removal of unsuitable materials is continuing at the building pad area between D and G lines. The water. 'treatment building between 3-line and 6-line was compacted and three compaction tests were performed using the sand cone method according to ASTM D1556. Test results exceeded 95% compaction of the modified proctor. Structural fill is being placed along C-line from 6-line to 9-line. This will be compacted and tested on Monday. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for moreinformation. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/14/2008 Report No. 5 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project 1 Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko ■ UTS'of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/14/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 5 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment M: ! ? ti 04:41 a P.6 U .. �4 7 -- `t9 A , r, �i i Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People- -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/13/20081 Report No. 4 Job Number 11670 David' Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite -2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset construction WEATHER: Sunny, 29-40 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT:Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction' EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat TEST METHOD: ❑ Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ® Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Topsoil, subsoil and unsuitable materials were being removed from the building pad area and the unsuitable materials were being trucked off site. Excavation continued down.to minus 19 feet from C- line to D-line between 6-line and 9-line. An area between 3-line and 6-line was also being excavated for Wastewater Treatment building. Nothing was compacted today so no testing was performed. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser r Our reports are available. in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira t Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/10/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover., MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Clear, 35 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction EQUIPMENT: Cat excavator, 10 'wheel clump TEST METHOD: ❑ Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ® Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer 9� ❑ Engineer OBSERVATIONS: This report follows a site visit to inspect earthwork for foundation subgrade. Its contents were discussed with Mr. DeLuca during this visit. At the time of this visit footing excavation continued along column line C to approximately 3'0" below bottom of footing elevation removing organic subsoils to natural dense sand subgrade. Geotechnical engineer of record to visit site this afternoon to review the presence of organic soil within the bu.ilding footprint. A field sketch is enclosed for review. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Kielty No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email.. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc, Attn: ,Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corn. Attn: John Teixeira R UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) Dav d Dunlap Associates, ?nc. Report Date 03/10i2008 Attn: Davin Dunlap Report No. 3 -1 '05 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 116-70 ` Hanover, MA 02339-1227, Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment :=`�i/ 008 19:36 401270i416 J N M FAX PAGE 02/05 �! v �. �DN� f' rq i g xvCODN NioZ7�C—NI A a Foor�wt� EX[AVA7100 coN'-rNVES To A P PRo X, 4 aE�o� e.o.F o ELE t/A7ld,J 17EMoVlA.) ti CRGAN�C s�85cu. To 1,)ATvRAL S/WD / � � SugGR�tDE f 1 OTS FIELD 5KETeH GAPE RcGE,UdV .H&4Lr9.dAR' C ti Qrio-og 3, K,Ec.TY i � Of Ma < ssachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/07/2008 Report No. 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset construction WEATHER: Sun/clouds .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction EQUIPMENT: Cat excavator, 10 wheel dump TEST METHOD: ❑ Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ® Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer OBSERVATIONS: At the time of this visit footing excavation began along column line C. At approximate bottom of footing elevation, a dense black organic layer of approximately 1' thick with roots and fibrous peat was encountered overlaying approximately 2' of orange/brown organic subsoil. This 3' organic layer appears to extend westerly into the proposed building footprint. At the footing location, excavation was carried down to the natural dense sand subgrade and will be filled and compacted back to B.O.F. elevation at a later date. Geotechnical engineer of record should evaluate the presence of organic material below proposed slab on grade. A field sketch is enclosed. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Kielty No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira -UTS-of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 3 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/07/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 2 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment I 33/07/2008 19:32 4012701416 J N M FAX PAGE 03/04 4 1 1 a�E T�*7Y��° - $os p X:00(A , •` i In •� ;vC �f / —MG) 0 X vM / G �v mwn6M ' cam$ D , D r O Zri M'D .tiv 2 Z Rxg . as v� k3m c C I of v o. 0 ;6tc � $ o b z Z V:; n u i xa z R > y a Ay z N i , i - �� Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/06/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Clear, 40 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction EQUIPMENT: None-previously prepared to B.O. F. elevation and compacted with a plate compactor. TEST METHOD: ❑ Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ® Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer OBSERVATIONS: This report follows a site visit to inspect earthwork for footing base. Its contents were discussed with Mr. DeLuca during this visit. Excavation was complete at proposed wastewater facility to bottom of footing elevation exposing a dense F/M light brown sand which appeared to have been proof compacted using a plate compactor. All locations found to be firm and stable and suitable for placement of concrete footing/slab on grade. Writer spoke with geotechnical engineer of record via phone to confirm subgrade observations. No problems were observed. -A field sketch is enclosed for review. The earthwork inspected during this visit does conform to geotechnical report of O'Reilly, Talbot and Oken dated 02-21-07 and project specifications 02200. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Kielty No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs: Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira -UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/06/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 1 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job-Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment 03/06/2008 18:07 4012701416 J N M FAX PAGE 06/06 c� v=C) oAG � w rn -4 O O _ /• n Dx �� U M ~� v as 6 Q N Z fi) z / r o 4 � _ �, N m O C ME 01C mz z /� � o � � � o7 m0 . z ~v vD13 Z C x A p` > CA iv g i z w a N X. Eo m4A -4 ^�w Oj t 1 '� Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 05/01/2008 Report No. 7 -Job Number 11670 . David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency.Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction CONTACT: Al Deluca of Nausat Construction ,TIME OF INSPECTION: 10 : 00 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 5/6/08 SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS: S1 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: SHOP DRAWING(S): R1 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES NO X AREA REVIEWED: Walls, column line G .at 6-9; bump out, column line 6 at C-G ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED Yes No Coverage(Top Bottom and/or Inside Face X Outside Face X) y, Clearance X Cleanliness(heavy rust,scale, mud,dirt,oil,etc. not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying X QX The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. 0 The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. GENERALREMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time Al Bradley No Min Day 3 Hr(s) Q Of Massachusetts 4 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 05/01/2008 Report No. 7 David Dunlap ,Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor. Nauset Construction .REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction. Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko�Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts 'The,Constructiion Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 04/25/2008 Report No. 6 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction CONTACT: Al Deluca TIME OF INSPECTION: 6 :30 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 3 :30 PM SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS: Si, S2 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: 3/10/08 SHOP DRAWING(S): R1, R2 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES NO AREA REVIEWED: Wall, column line C at 5-6, 5 & 6 at C-C.1, 6 at C-G ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED Yes No Coverage(Top x Bottom x and/or Inside Face x Outside.Face x ) X Clearance X Cleanliness (heavy rust,scale,mud,dirt,oil,etc.not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying X ❑X The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. 0 The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. GENERAL REMARKS: The top sections of the wall were completed and tied prior to concrete placement. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No 4 Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 04/25/2008 Report No. 6 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction .REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Wz v Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reportsOutsofmass.com for more information. CC: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko r Of.Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Repoli Report Date 04/22/2008 Report No. 5 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap , 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction CONTACT: Al Deluca TIME OF INSPECTION: 7 :00 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: unscheduled SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40. Grade 60 X Grade 75 ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS: S1, S2 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: 3/10/08 SHOP DRAWING(S): R1, R2 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES X NO AREA REVIEWED: Walls, column line C at 5-6, 6 at C-C.1 - bottom 8 feet ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED Yes No Coverage(Top x Bottom x and/or Inside Face x Outside Face x ) X Clearance X Cleanliness (heavy rust,scale,mud,dirt,oil,etc. not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying X OX The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. 0 The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Of Massachusetts `The' Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 04/22/2008 Report No. 5 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02 3 3 9-122 7 Contractor Nauset Construction f .REVIEWED BY: Wiliiam P. Crabtree L( HOC/ Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko f . Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 04/14/2008 Report No. 4 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 ` Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction CONTACT: Al Deluca .TIME OF INSPECTION: 11 : 00 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 1 : 00 PM SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS: S1 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: 3/26/07 SHOP DRAWING(S): PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES NO X AREA REVIEWED: Wall, column line C at 6 & 9 ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED Yes No Coverage(Top x Bottom x and/or Inside Face x Outside Face x ) X Clearance X Cleanliness (heavy rust,scale,mud,dirt,oil,etc. not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying X OX The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. 0 The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. GENERAL REMARKS: No exceptions taken. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time. Hours Time L. Villani No Max Day 3 Hr(s) L Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Test iing People Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 04/14/2008 Report No. 4 Job Number. 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn : David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction .REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn:. John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering . Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing.SteefReport Report Date 04/09/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction CONTACT: Al Deluca .TIME OF INSPECTION: 12 : 00 PM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 4/11/08 SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS: S1, S2 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: 3/10/08 SHOP DRAWING(S): R1, R2 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES X NO AREA REVIEWED: Wall, column line C at 6-9 ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED e Yes No Coverage (Top x Bottom x and/or Inside Face x Outside Face x ) X Clearance X Cleanliness(heavy rust,scale, mud,dirt,oil,etc. not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying X QX The details in the above described area(s)were in process at the time of this inspection. The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to'departure from the project site. Only the first 8 feet (vertical) were completed today and enclosed balance of it was GENERAL REMARKS: still in process. Inspector Premium Travel .Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Min Day 3 Hr(s) Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 04/09/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree W7 Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports®utsofmass.com for more information. CC: Radius Management' Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing People' I Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 03/28/2008 Report No. 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction CONTACT: Al Deluca TIME OF INSPECTION: 6 :30 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 7 :30 AM SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS: Sl, S2 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: 3/10/08 SHOP DRAWING(S): R1., R2 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES X NO AREA REVIEWED: Slab & footings, waste water treatment ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED Yes No Coverage(Top x Bottom x and/or Inside Face x Outside Face x ) X Clearance X Cleanliness (heavy rust,scale,mud,dirt,oil,etc. not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying X QX The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. Q The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. GENERAL REMARKS: water stop installed after placement. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No q. Of Massachusetts, 'The Construction Testing People- Page 2 .5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 03/28/2008 Report No. 2 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Project. Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction .REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree LC/Tv Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko 4 Of !Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People- -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel.Report Report Date 03/25/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ;Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction CONTACT: Al Deluca ,TIME OF INSPECTION: 7 : 00 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 3/28/08 SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 'ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS: Si, S2 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: 3/10/0 8 SHOP DRAWING(S): R1, R2 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES X NO AREA REVIEWED: Footing, column line C at 6-9 ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED Yes No Coverage(Top x Bottom x and/or Inside Face x Outside Face x ) X Clearance X Cleanliness(heavy rust,scale, mud,dirt,oil,etc. not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying X QX The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. M The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. Two vertical bars on outside face and three vertical bars on inside face were missing. GENERALREMARKS: All were installed prior to writer's departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Min Day 3 Hr(s), 4 Of Massachusetts .The Construction Testing People' Page 2 - 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 03/25/2008 Report No. 1 ' David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn : David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree WT C/ Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko I ' I Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/06/2008 Report No. 7 David Dunlap Associates, Inc Job Number 11670. Attn : David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Ready Mix ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/4" No. Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 52 SET 1 LOCATION: wall, column line G at 6, C at 9 Total Unit` Slump(in.) 4 Lab Size Area bate Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp.(F.) 75 No: (in.) (sq.iris) Condition ,.Cast L;. Tested Days (ibs.) (psi.); Type. Conc Temp(F) 73 V650 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/06/2008 05/13/2008 7 35,000 2,790 2 Truck No. 239 V651 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/06/2008 05/20/2008 14 Ticket No. 11715 V652 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/06/2008 06/03/2008 28 Time 2:45 V653 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/06/2008 06/03/2008 28 V654 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/06/2908 06/03/2008 28 Unit Wt Ibslcu ft Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium, Travel Name Time. . Hours Time, J. Grocer No REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES (1)Cone (2)Cone and Split (3)Cone and Shear (4)Shear (5)Columnar Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at re portswutsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management.Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 0 5/0 6/2 0 0 s Report No. 7 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Ready Mix FIELD SUMMARY REPORT .'Total Pour: walls, column line G at 6, C at 9 Method of Placement: ®Pump [].Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑ Truck Discharge Chute ® End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ❑ Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer ❑X Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ® None ❑ Other Slump Specification (in.) 3-5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 05/06/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 7 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment Of r&ftftKJK1r'4ft kw. « C'mftuWol1 Teoing p * DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE ROUR Page# - PR'OJECT NAME: �A F -- _ �E2�FNC( __PROJECT NO.- 1167, :ATE: '5 _ AIR TEMP.: 26 c�TOTAL YARDS: S Z �_CCATION OF POUR: VAII- F ad ! Slump Satching Qatching Time !n Yarns Concrete %or Ticket# Inches In Out Mi nutes + No_ or y,� ! i Temp. 'Air � J Cyfindef: aga 2vb ti-4 Z3r I 1 17'1 1 y 1*7Z ts' 0 61 i q9 Zo`6I< � I I I � i I REMARKS: UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 05/06/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 7 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 .lob Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment r *11w Consftwftn Tesft p"W DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR Page# ?ROJECT NAME: �H E �E 6�rrc• PROJECT NO.• LDATE: �/6 v F ---__ AIR TEMP.: �6 TOTAL YARDS: s Z �-CCATION OF POUR: L Siump 9 Batchin Batching Time In Yards ConcretcT emp. Air �^-K# i inches In out Minutes I of 17ickei# No_ of f i ' Cyfindei age 3;IS 7� is ib 3:4 J 4. 4/ ' c 20 b 1 i I I i i 1N5(=tnCTOR: f' `� -�. _- REMARKS.- Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/02/2008 Report No. 6 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete CO. Lawrence Ready Mix ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/4" No. Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 6 SET 1 LOCATION: Wall, column line E at 4-5 Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp.(F.) 54 No. (in.) (sq.in:) Condition Cast Tested Days (lbs.) (psi.) Type Conc Temp(F) 75 T455 4 x 8 12.56 Good OS/02/2008 O5/09/2008 7 36,000 2,870 2 Truck No. 9 T456 4 x 8 12.56 Good OS/02/2008 05/16/2008 14 48,000 3,820 1 Ticket NO. 20632 O5 T457 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/02/2008 /30/2008 28 T458 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/02/2008 05/30/2008 28 Time 9:00 T459 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/02/2008 OS/30/2008 za Unit Wt Ibs/cu ft Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada r FRACTURE TYPES Ii{r. d J I • 5. s I I Iy (1)Cone (2)Cone and Split (3)Cone and Shear (4)Shear (5)Columnar Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Secs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05/02/2008 Report No. 6 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Ready Mix FIELD SUMMARY REPORT "Total Pour: wall, column line E at 4-5 Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑ Truck Discharge Chute ® End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ® Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ® Trailer ❑X Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ®Thermal Blankets ® Heat ® None ❑ Other Slump Specification (in.) 3-5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04/25/2008 Report No. 5 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil=le Attn: David Dunlap - 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. P. A. Landers ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/411 No. Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 55 SET 1 LOCATION: Wall, Column Line C at line 5 to 6, Line 6 to line C to G and Line 5 to line C to C.1. Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp.(F.) 62 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested Days (lbs.) (psi.) Type Conc Temp(F) 74 S848 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/25/2008 05/02/2008 7 38,000 3,030 2 Truck No. 269 S849 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/25/2008 05/09/2008 14 51,000 4,060 .2 S850 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/25/2008 05/23/2008 28 TicketN No. 20625 S851 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/25/2008 05/23/2008 28 Time 3:30 S852 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/25/2008 05/23/2008 28 Unit Wt Ibs/cu ft Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada r FRACTURE TYPES 'S (1)Cone (2) Cone and Split (3)Cone and Shear (4)Shear (5)Columnar Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko III i Of Massachusetts "The Construction Testing People" Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04/25/2008 Report No. 5 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. P. A. Landers FIELD SUMMARY REPORT 'Total Pour: wall, Column Line C at line 5 to 6, Line 6 to line C to G and Line 5 to line C to C.1. Method of Placement: ®Pump Chute Discharge Bucket Other ` Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: Truck Discharge Chute ® End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box [-]-Thermal Blanket Hay/Straw 0 Trailer Field ® Other Placement Protection: Thermal Blankets Q Heat ® None Other Slump Specification (in.) 3 - 5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: f . Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04/18/2008 Report No. 4 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn; David Dunlap _ 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete CO. Lawrence Ready Mix ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/411 No. Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 30 SET 1 LOCATION: Footings, column line C at 9, G at 6; elevator walls, basement level Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp.(F.) 62 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested Days (lbs.) (psi.) Type Conc Temp(F) 74 R335 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/18/2008 04/25/2008 7 36,000 2,870 3 Truck NO. 243 R336 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/18/2008 05/02/2008 14 48,000 3,820 4 Ticket No. 17647 R337 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/18/2008 05/16/2008 28 5.8,000 4,620 1 Time 1:30 R338 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/18/2008 05/16/2008 28 55,000 4,380 2 R339 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/18/2008 05/16/2008 28 57,000 4,540 4 Unit Wt Ibs/cu ft Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES r' r, 5 1'1 (1)Cone (2)Cone and Split (3)Cone and Shear (4)Shear (5)Columnar Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04/18/2008 Report No. 4 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn : David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Ready Mix FIELD SUMMARY REPORT 'Total Pour: Footings, column line C at 9, G at 6;. elevator walls, basement level Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑ Truck Discharge Chute ® End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ❑ Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer ❑ Field ® Other covered with styrofoam insulation Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ® None ❑ Other Slump Specification (in.) 2-4 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing PeopW Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report -Concrete Report Date 04/14/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset 'Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Concrete ALL'FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/4" No. Of Sets: 2 CUBIC YARDS: 106 SET 1 LOCATION: wall, column line C at 6 Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 1/4 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp.(F.) 5o No. (in.) (sq. in.) Condition Cast Tested Days (lbs.) (psi.) Type Conc Temp(F) 70 Q240 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/14/2008 04/21/2008 7 40,000 3,180 3 Truck NO. 1243 Q241 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/14/2008 04/28/2008 14 51,000 4,060 2 Ticket No. L17613 Q242 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/14/2008 05/12/2008 28 65,000 5,180 1 Time 1:15 Q243 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/14/2008 OS/12/2008 28 67,000 5,330 2 Q244 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/14/2008 OS/12/2008 28 68,000 5,410 4 Unit Wtlbslcuft Air Content(%) SET 2 LOCATION: wall, column line C at 9 Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 1/2 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture 52 Air Temp. (F.) No. (in.) (sq. in.) Condition Cast Tested Days (lbs.) (psi.) Type Air Temp .)(FJ 70 P903 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/14/2008 04/21/2008 7 41,000 3,260 1 Truck No. 1238 P904 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/14/2008 04/28/2008 14 52,000 4,140 3 P905 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/14/2008 05/12/2008 28 71,000 5,650 1 Ticket No. L17615 P906 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/14/2008 05/12/2008 28 70,000 5,570 z Time 2:10 P907 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/14/2008' 05/12/2008 28 67,000 5,330 3 Unit Wt Ibslcu ft Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time L. Villani No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES II ' (1) Cone (2)Cone and Split (3)Cone and Shear (4)Shear (5)Columnar q Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04/14/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville . 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Concrete .Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow ) Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 3 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04/14/2008 Report No. 3 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence Concrete FIELD SUMMARY REPORT 'Total Pour: Column line C at 6-9; footing, column line 6 to existing building; stairway footings; elevator pad Method of Placement: ❑X Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ® Truck Discharge Chute ❑ End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ❑ Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer ® 'Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ❑ None ® Other covered Slump Specification (in.) 5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: r - IUTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)7817438-6216(Fax) g David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/14/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 3 105 We bster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. , Centervil Attachment FAX NO. Oct. 28 2007 10:29PM P1 Of romwhuseft hic TmC moonwiKil"Ta"M . � Page# DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR d �E'- OJECT NAME: I +,Gc f u.r - CPn� I� � PROJECTNO.: i AIR TEMP.:` � TOTAL YARDS:106 U:rlTICN OF <i G l/ , ,' iU Slump matching Batching Time In Yards` {fConcrete %of 3 Ticket# No.ci I Inches fn_ out Minutes I Temp.- Air I Cylinders 1 5-6 I 2 /d P 0 i � i i 1 1; I 11 REMARKS: 3 Z S .ardsonl Lane, 8toneharn, Massachusetts 02180 (781) 438-7755 Fax (7811 438-6216 IUTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 5 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/14/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 3 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment FAX NO. Oct. 28 2007 10:29PM P1 of MG&UKca 17ft i�iftf# ti;�r 18� . Page# DAILY REPORT OF CONCRF-TE POUR _ J/n ,,,, J,IECT NAME: D!Oc I r! - �hV u ,r b J P�o��CT NO.: Ll C� YARDS: J/ h AiR TEMP.:.��, TOTAL1 (_.:3TION OF k: CU,� � Lve� JI slump Batching Batching Time In Yards Concrete %of S Ticket# No. cF I G linders Inches In _ f out Minutes I Temp. Air 1 Y 1� i i/ o — lj I/y ' 05 a Ibll i ZIi I i f REMARKS: 32- S a�s3sora Lane, Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180 (781) 438-7755 Fax (781) 438-6216 UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 6 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) g David Dunlap Associates Inc. Report Date o4 14 p / /2ooa Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 3 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil _ Attachment FAX NO. Oct. 28 2007 10:29PM P1 Page# T#� c#fin T+ g'. ie . DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR, <JJEGT NAME: PROJECTNO-: AIR TEMP.: `ti0 TOTAL YARDS:f 0 TION OF p Slump Batchirg i �Batc�hing �Time In Yards' Concrete %of j Ticket# No.of ! Inches In ; out I Minutes Temp. Air 1 Cylinders 125 65 IN 1� i I 72 1 i i s,E _� � CTOR / ;.•'1 T ititi REMARKS: 3 Z D S -ardson Lane, 8tonehamm, Massachusetts 02180 (781) 438-7755 Fax (781) 438-6216 Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04/03/2008 Report No. 2 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn• David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. LRM ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 . C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/411 1No. Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 30 SET 1 LOCATION: South wall, waste water treatment plant Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 ;K6 b Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp.(F.) 53 . (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested Days (lbs.) (psi.) Type 2 4 x 8 12.56 Good 44/03/2008 04/10/2008 7 38,000 3,030 2 Conc Temp(F) 63 K163 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/03/2008 04/17/2008 14 48,000 3,820 4 Truck No. 1238 K164 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/03/2008 OS/Ol/2008 28 62,000 4,940 1 Ticket No. 17563 K165 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/03/2008 OS/O1/2008 28 65,000 5,180 4 Time 3:15 Unit Wt Ibs/cu ft Air Content(%)' GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Helio Monteiro Time Hours Time No Min Day,.. 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES ff; I f r � (1)Cone (2)Cone and Split (3)Cone and Shear O 4 Shear (5)Columnar Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reportsOutsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. At Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04/03/2008 Report No. 2 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 1.05 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. LRM FIELD SUMMARY REPORT 'Total Pour: Waste water treatment plant wall Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑ Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ® Truck Discharge Chute ❑ End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ❑ Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer © Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ®Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ❑ None ❑ Other Slump Specification (in.) 2-4 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/03/20.08 Attn: David Dunlap Rep ort No. 2 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. , Centervil Attachment Of hslsettS lnc. "TM Construction Testing people* Pa DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR ge ---------- PROJECT NAME: Y —C.40= D -mac t - it PROJECT NO.: CATE: �O --- --- AIR TEMP.: y' 3 TOTAL YARDS: )o LOCATION OF POUR: .Loaa SIUmo . Bata"na Baichino Time In ; Yards Concrete °�Inches In Out Minutes-i o or TicketNo. o, i emo. Air i Cviinders 3 J, Ll II j a i j i i i i I I j j i i I I I I I i i j I INSPECTOR:1��� —' a ��r✓T�,� REMARKS: -- 5 Richardson Zane, Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180 (781) 438_77$5 Fax (781) 438-8216 fUTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) g David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/03/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 2 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 .lob Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment Of Pkiswhusetft h1C. i R C�t1Sfi'u 'ti4m tOSttf1� p ' DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR Pace t PROJECT NAN1E: C�At'= D= - �t- N— if PROJECT NO.: AIR TEMP,: TOTAL YARDS: o' 1 OCA,ION n —t— CF POUR:_.IA/A�.—� •217_F rr to Slump i Batchina Batchina Time In '' Yards Concrete ruci< + Inches In V ! Out o of Ticket No. of Minutes i Temp. A.ir j � Cviinders a� 1 i ------------ I I I i i 1 i 1 I I I i • I � I I I � I I I i I I - '� ' REMARKS: S Richardson Lane, Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180 (781) 438.775$ Fax (7$1) 438_62 18 UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 5 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/03/2008 Attn:-David Dunlap Report No. 2 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. , Centervil Attachment Of Massachusetts Inc. RTIW Cafl "Ct *n rash" s DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR Pace ` PROJECT NANIE: s'.�� �^ _ _mot_ 1r/ PROJECT NO.: SATE: 16 O AIR TEMP.: --' _TOTAL YARDS.' LOCATION OF POUR: Lo,d u Siump Batcnino ; Baicningluck Time In ; Yards + Inches In Out Minutes emo. Air Cvlmders 17 0 /75 '— -�2 _ �-pis- •� i — ° ,I ' I i j i i i II I f i i I i i i I i ;NSrECTOR: l/,, - �c� 7r✓T/ i� ; R"EMA,RKS: 5 Richardson Zane, Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180 (781) 438-7755 Fax 781 �4 ( ) 38-6218 UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 6 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) g David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/03/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 2 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job-Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. , Centervil Attachment Of 1kassalchuse4ts Inc. w ' � Construction tossing p�oop�" DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR Paae --'-- ROJECT NAME:�p` ^.y A .•cam /�-�lr/� PROJECT NO.: LATE v � o AIR TEMP.: 3 TOTAL YARDS: �q LOCATION OF POUR: Load & Slump . Batching Eaic7ing Time In Y , rues m Inches I girds �oncre e /o of TicKet No. of Out Minutes , T emo. Air CAinders 3 - _ �I 7565 I I I i i I I I I I I i i I I -. ! INSPEC TOP,: REMARKS: %; S Richardson Zane, Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180 (781) 438-7755 Fax 781 � ) 4 38-6218 ► o. Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing Peeplem -Page 1 5,Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report -Concrete Report Date 03/28/2008 Report No. 1 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete CO. Lawrence ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/411 * No. Of Sets: 2 CUBIC YARDS: 80 SET 1 LOCATION: Slab, waste water treatment Total Unit Slump(in.) 3 1/2 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp.(F.) 43 No. (in.) (sq. in.) Condition Cast Tested Days (Ibs.) (psi.) Type Conc Temp(F) 71 H944 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/04/2008 7 35,000 2,790 4 Truck No. 240 H945 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/11/2008 14 48,000 3,820 4 Ticket No. 20477 H946 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/25/2008 28 63,000 5,020 1 H947 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/25/2008 28 66,000 5,250 4 Time 7:45 Unit Wt Ibs/cu ft Air Content(%) SET 2 LOCATION: Footing, column line C at 6-9 Total Unit Slump(in.) 4 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp.(F.) 46 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested Days (Ibs) (psi.) Type Conc Temp(F) 72 J940 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/04/2008 7 36,000 2,870 4 Truck Na 269 J941 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/11/2008 14 48,000 3,820 1 Ticket No. 20481 J942 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/25/2008 28 68,000 51410 2 J943 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/25/2008 28 65,000 5,180 3 Time 9:15 Unit Wt Ibs/cu ft Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: * 2 o polarset Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No REVIEWED BY: . Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES 1 Cone 2( Cone and'S Spl it it 3 on( ) Cone and Shear p 4 Shear� O 5( ) ( )Columnar Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date .03/28/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete CO. Lawrence cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko i Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 3 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 03/28/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence FIELD SUMMARY REPORT 'Total Pour: Footings, column line C at 6-9; slab & footings, waste water treatment plant Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑ Truck Discharge Chute ® End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ❑X Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer ❑ Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ❑ None ❑ Other Slump Specification(in.) 2-4 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: Oavid W. Ouaeap o�&daciated, Vac. ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-PLANNERS 105 Webster Street, Units 1 &2 Hanover, MA 02339 (781)878-0066 FAX(781)878-7060 E-mail:david@dhdunlap.com April 24, 2008 Mr. Thomas Perry, Director Building Division Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Re: Cape Regency Assisted Living Dear Mr: Perry: Our office has compiled field reports from job meetings being held on a continuing basis at Cape Regency under Permit #B 20073078. This information is being'provided to-you for your records as required under controlled construction, Section 116.2.1 of the MSB, 780 CMR 61h Edition. Attached hereto are field reports for Febbruary_28`h- A- April-1.7„ 2008. Per your request, attached hereto please find testing reports for your information. Sincerely yours, VID H. DUNL ASSOCIATES, INC. David H. Dunlap,Jr., NCARB, AR fs f~= President ! s co S(T+ O L . . A February 28, 2008 I . RADIUS PLYMOUTH ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Matt Muratore, Adm. DoN Peidatric Jon Truslow Jim Goulet Jon Teixeira Brett Beattie David Dunlap Purpose: Review the progress of the project, fire alarm approval and the monthly requisition. Construction Administration 1. Construction Schedule: A. Alzheimer's Common Area, 2nd floor, is not occupied: 1. Installation of the VWC has not commenced due to the cut/patching necessary for the fire alarm. B. Murley room is still incomplete. 1. An isolation valve needs to be installed; otherwise, the entire building would have to be shut down: This-valve is now in place. Nauset's plumber is to come on Friday. C. Painting: 1. Painting of doors,frames and wainscot on the 1st floor is underway. 2. Painting on the 2nd floor has been completed. 3. Touch-up painting in the basement corridor needs to be completed and diffuser installed. D. Ceiling in Hopkins unit sitting room has been replaced. Roof steel still needs to be installed. E. Key pad for egressing the Alzheimer's common area has to be replaced as it is malfunctining. F. Number of vertical duct risers including access panels required need to be completed. This was discussed in detail. G. Main Entrance Lobby: The new carpet, ceiling and ductwork have been installed. Items remaining are: 1. Installation of wood base,which is scheduled for this week. 2. Discussed location of the receptionist. Nothing was resolved. Our office pointed out that there is not enough room in front of the elevator lobby to install a desk, have enough room for the secretary's chair and leave 8' clear in front of the desk. 2. Job Super's Look Ahead was provided. See attached. 3. Requisition: This was reviewed and determined that it could be approved as amended. Jon Teixeira to'revise and'submitfor approval. Jon Truslow indicated that this should be turned around quickly for processing so that Nauset can be paid 4. PCO: A. #1 - Main Entrance Doors: Incomplete, awaiting for delivery date. B. #2- Incomplete. C. #6 - New Fire Alarm System: I spoked with Battalion Chief Young,who said that the plans submitted are verbally approved. He had one comment from his superintendent of wires, which is that he wants the connections inside the fire alarm box at the main entrance to be replaced including the cable from the building to the pole: We discussed this and it appears to this office to be unusual for a town to require an existing building to do this. DHDA will speak with the engineer and have him contact the fire dept. This will have to be negotiated into the fire alarm contract once resolved. Discussed (5) bids in detail. The on-site electrician was the low bidder. This was reviewed in detail and the contract signed with the electrician doing the work presently so that he can order the material which will take 2 weeks. He will pull wire while waiting for the material to be delivered. Discussed that this needs to be done ASAP. As the GC points out, the patching of walls cannot commence until the fire alarm is installed, activated and approved by the town. D. Nurse Call, 2nd Floor: system has been installed, but the walls still need to be patched and firesafing installed. E. Roof Replacement: CentiMark met with Jon Truslow and me to negotiate a cost reduction which is delineated in Change Order #2 by CentiMark. They are ordering the materials and the plan is to commence work on the two pediatric roofs as they have a minimal amount of mechanical equipment on the roof. They will then commence work on the geriatric wing roof. It was agreed that doing this wing last will place it at the beginning of April, which will allow time for the coordination of the deliver of the roof to units and the new curbs bein ordered and the Y P being. ordered fan from the kitchen hood. We recommended that the reinforcing for the units commence straight away since the steel needs to be fabricated and then delivered. Jon Truslow indicated that there will be (4) dumpsters to be utilized for the re-roofing, two in the front and two in the back. Nauset indicated that they will coordinate with the roof, but there needs to be a clear time line and an area that the contractors are working in as Nauset will also have debris coming off the roof as well. F. We reviewed and approved the PCO for the nurses' stations. 5. Change Orders: We reviewed CO #3,which included(3) PCOs, and approved. It will be incorporated into the requisition as discussed. Walk-Thru 1. 2nd Floor, Sub-Acute Unit:While the new ACT is installed with one light remaining to be installed, the room itself will be painted by the facility. It also requires new base as the base has been removed in"this room. 2. The cross-corridor doors between the Alzheimer's Unit and elevator lobby need two vision panels, 6" x 12", metal frame, etc. or reuse the glass/frame from the previous doors. The windows will have to be cut in. We tested these doors relative to the key pads working for the controlled access. They operated correctly. It was noted that the doors do require an astragal. t If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing. Next meeting is scheduled for 2 pm on 3/13/08. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. I� March 13, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Tony Papantonis Jim Goulet Kevin Scrima Al Deluca Jon Teixeira Jon Truslow Stan, SS Design David Dunlap Purpose: Review progress of project and review subsoils. r Construction Administration 1. Construction Schedule: The job super advised that the project is behind schedule due to the organic material encountered in the footing excavation. At the end of last weein the week unsuitable material was encountered. The geotech engineer was requested to review the material. After Michael Talbot reviewed the material, he issued a letter,which indicated that this material must be removed and clean material on- site could be used to backfill. UTS, the testing lab, was requested to be on-site daily to review the removal of soil, do compaction tests, inspect the rebar and keep track of the material being removed. We contacted Michael Talbot by phone during the meeting to discuss the situation. It appeared that the area in question was being over-excavated. The geotech was requested to come to the site to review with the job super and UTS what needed to be removed and to eliminate over-excavation. 2. Sitework: We asked SS Design to provide an update on the following: A.. Conservation Commission, March 1P: The additional spaces were presented to the commission. It was approved with conditions. Some plantings need to be removed and replaced after the work is completed. SS Design will have some identify the plants so that we can comply. He indicated that there were some other minor changes as well. 1 B. SS Design was requested to make the changes on the site plan so that it meets the conditions of the conservation commission, then have it stamped and delivered to the zoning attorney for filing with the planning board. C. Foundation Control: SS Design provided the dimensional control required for the foundation to the GC. It is our understanding that he set off-sets so that the foundation will be laid out so that the GC can construct as submitted to the local authorities having jurisdiction. We noted that the foundation layout is critical and SS Designs responsibility. Stan advised a surveyor to do this and they will be responsible for doing the as-built once the foundation has been completed. D. Foundation Progress: 1. The excavation for the footings for the WWTP has been completed. Compaction tests need to be done by UTS. 2. Underground piping has been installed. 3: SS Design (Tom Ryder) will provide the dimensional location of the pipe with the vertical tie-ins into the sewage treatment plant. 'Once this is installed, then the reinforcing for the slab can be set in place. 4.' Pouring foundation: A. Rebar to be inspected by UTS once placed. B. Pour shall be continuous and vertical rods to come out to engage the vertical concrete walls that surround it. C. Once the soil is installed and compacted between the existing building footings and the new concrete wall the wall will be reinforced on the sewage treatment side so that the compaction will not crack the wall. D, Appropriate strength needs to be achieved before the backfill. E. The earthy area between the vertical wall and the existing foundation, once poured, needs to be protected so that there is no wash out from rain. I } J 5. DHDA recommended that Nauset look at building a crawl space as opposed to excavating all of the material out of it; then putting the excavated material back in place. It appeared to be extremely costly. The design for a crawl space had been done and was taken out under Value Engineering. Summary: Take the retaining wall located on"C" line and bring it over to "A" line. Leave the end foundations stepped as shown on the previous design. There would be a couple columns on the back face and in the middle. The structural steel, concrete slab,footings would be the same as before except the sheetrock wall would be brought out and be lined up with Column Line "C" and only put a gravel base in the crawl space. When we 1"received the shop drawings from the structural steel co. and the rebar co. they had the steel designed to meet these requirements and then they changed them. Therefore, they have this information. DHDA thinks that by making a few calls, these costs could be organized and then a logical decision made. I believe that if all of the soil is taken out and then put back in the owner does not get anything for the money. If the crawl space is constructed, next year or in 5 years they can utilize it for some purpose that will allow their operations to be more financially viable. If we went with the original design, perhaps only 4' of the organic material would be taken out then bringing it back in up to grade. The additional cost would be substantially less. The construction phase may be increased somewhat but it will be affected anyway. The question is what does the owner have at the end of the day. 3. Shop Drawings: A. Status: 1. Request status of the elevator shop drawing for size of the elevator pit. Nauset advised that they are working on it. They intend to over-size the footing/slab if dimensions'are not available immediately., Care must be taken when excavating for the elevator slab on the side that faces the existing building. We do not want to undermine the existing footings. Necessary safety precautions shall be put in place. 2. Structural Steel: Require the location of the hatch on the sewage treatment plant. This information was requested from Tom Ryder weeks ago. DHDA does not know where the hatch is to be located over top of the plant itself. We don't want an extra when this gets constructed. B. Under Review: 1. plumbing fixture and trim 2. structural steel C. Returned to GC: 1. sprayed fireproofing 2. reznor make up air units 3. sewage ejector, cleanout drains, wall hydrants, carriers 4. Requisition: J. Truslow stated that it is being processed. 5. PCO/CO: A. Change Order #2: No.Cost Time Delay: Due to the unforeseen conditions that exist with the foundations under the addition, this will be re- evaluated by Nauset. 6. ASI: A. #7: Response to RFI #1: Inverts under the slab for the sanitary line issued 3/3/08 to Nauset. B. #5: Status of changing to hollow core doors:STwo options are now on the table: 1. Lower the hardware so that the cylindrical lock can be installed in the hollow core door at the cross panel. 2. Replace HM frames with wood frames. 7. Testing: We contacted Michael Talbot, geotech engineer who evaluated the soils. to request that he do a site visit to meet with UTS and explain how much soil needs to be removed at the organic level. It appears that the amount of soil being taken out is excessive. We want to be safe but don't want to remove undisturbed material to then compact and put back in place. { i 8. Job super provided his look ahead to those in attendance. Construction Coordination 1. Jon Truslow indicated that the construction has not interfered with the operations. 2. Parking Issues: A. It was previously reported that visitors were parking against the construction fence. This problem has been alleviated. B. GC is providing information to the facility relative to parking as the sitework changes. 3. J. Truslow to schedule a meeting on the E-call system to resolve this and purchase the correct system. 4. We requested the location of the nourishment station. J. Ciccareillo to provide information. Site View 1. Viewed the excavation and could see the horizontal line of the organic material in the excavation of the'footings. The question was why the excavation was extended so far below it,4' -5'. 2. Excavation is ongoing. The engineer indicated that the soils in the footprint of the building can be utilized in the backfill as long as it does not have organic material. 3. UTS inspector was on-site. The recommendation was to get the WWTP foundations installed ASAP as they are exposed and once compaction tests are done and underground piping is completed, they should be poured. In anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise, this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap, Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. cc: attendees March 27, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow Jim Goulet Jon Teixeria Al Deluca Kevin Scrima Tom Ryder David Dunlap Purpose: Review the progress of project and the March requisition. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule Update: A. J. Goulet stated that the project is on schedule. When asked about the delay due to unsuitable soils, he indicated that they had previously requested an extension of time, 4 days, and he felt that this would be the extent of it., He qualified it by saying that it depended upon changes being requested by the owner at a number of meetings. These would be address on a case by case basis. He did indicate that they will need to work on Saturdays to keep up with the schedules. 2. Site Engineering: A. Tom Ryder was asked if the site utility as-builts are complete. He stated he is working on the underground sanitary line and would have them completed by 4/10/08. B. Discussed utilizing the sewage treatment plant for watering the lawns. We discussed aspects of the system: 1. Tom Ryder reported that the underground root watering system costs about$90,000 (to expenses). 2. Discussed installing the piping only from the sewage treatment plant up to the fields for use later as supply lines for an irrigation system. Nauset was asked to price out this. This would also _ include an upgrade of one of the underground tanks. They will provide an estimated cost. C. Has the vegetation that the conservation commission wants removed and then re-planted been identified? It was requested that they be identified by 4/10/08 so Nauset understands what plants are involved. D. Update on WWTP: 1. We have not received shop drawings for the metal grating and ladders in the plant. Ryder and GC to look into the status. 2. Requested status on shop drawings on: 1. exhaust ductwork 2. roof hatch 3. exterior,bollards 4. miscellaneous metal around plant GC to find out the status. E. Planning Board: Stan delivered the revised conservation commission plans showing the additional parking spaces to the attorney's office who we assume will file it with the Registry of Deeds and the Planning Board. Jon Truslow to follow up. F. Underground drain line has been installed in the plant with the connection piping running above the foundation slab. 3. Testing: A. Compaction Tests: Received from UTS. Job super provided compaction tests taken in the area of the sewage treatment plant. It appeared that it is in excess of 95% compaction which is acceptable. B. Concrete cylinders: It was agreed that there will be a set of (4) concrete cylinders taken in increments of 50 yards of concrete when poured. DHDA recommended that the (5) cylinders be taken of the high wall to ascertain when the wall reaches 75% structural strength for backfilling. ` No concrete pours have been attempted yet. 4. Shop Drawings: A. Status: 1. General information has been sent back to the elevator company. It was reported that we will be receiving elevator shop drawings next week. B. Being Reviewed: 1. cleanouts and floor drains 2. cold form metal framing 3. cold form metal framing calcluations C. Returned to GC: 1. plumbing fixtures and trim D. Open items: 1. Review of lighting fixtures by the interior designer.' 2. Decision on the E-call manufacturer. J. Truslow to set up meeting. 5. PCOs: A. Open: doors 6. Job super's look ahead: It focuses on pouring 90 cubic yards of concrete on 3/28/08, continuation of excavating the foundations and installing formwork for the foundation walls, which shall be taken place over the next wo weeks. Construction Coordination 1. Jon indicated that there was water damage inside the building on the single wing. GC indicated that this has been repaired and it has rained since then and there do not appear to be additional issues: 2. Parking Issues: Scheduling is ongoing. 3. Owner is to order and have delivered to the site a container so that the material in the storage room can be relocated so that the contractors can perform their work inside the basement area of the existing building. Container to be delivered in two weeks. 4. Job super indicated that there is a crack over the arch of the masonry wall at the J entrance to the building. This wall was reviewed and determined to be a non- bearing wall. GC to monitor it to see if it becomes a problem. 5. Job super provided DHDA a copy of Sagamore s testing on the underground piping. He indicated that the town plumbing inspector reviewed and approved it before it was back-filled. 6. Colors/Patterns: We asked if any comments have been made by the suppliers on availability of the colors and patterns selected for finish materials. Jon Teixeira indicated that there was a problem with the flooring but that the interior designer resolved this by selecting another flooring material. Next job meeting is scheduled for 4/3/08. F i J April 10, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow Jim Goulet Jon Teixeria Al Deluca Kevin Scrima Stan, SS Design , David Dunlap Purpose: Review the progress of the project. Weather: Sunny, 57 degrees Site Walk 1. The foundation contractor was in the process of installing rebar for the footings. The footings were formed and rebar was being installed on the footings for the elevator pit, stair tower and grade beams. 2. Wall forms for Column Line"C" are installed on one side. Rebar is being set in the vertical wall. , 3. Job super advised that they are getting ready for an 80 yard pour on Monday. 4. The waterproofing contractor for the concrete foundations will be on site 4/14 and 4/15. 1 advised that a reglet is required at the top of the wall to receive the sheet waterproofing. All penetrations through the waterproofing shall be made water-tight. 5. We discussed over-sizing the footing for the elevator and increasing the size of the backwall due to the fact that the elevator shop drawings are not available to set the shaft for the elevator. Contractor was advised that he is at risk due to the fact that the elevator shop drawings have not been reviewed/approved. 6. Discussed the water stop to go between the footing and the elevator pit wall and the water stop required for the basement area. Super stated that he would see that it is installed. 7. We discussed the sum that goes in the elevator pit. It needs.to be a minimum of 18" x 18' x 12" deep: 8. Discussed the sump that is engineered for the mechanical room is on=site and it R shall be set in concrete. 9. Minimal sitework underway. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: Project is on schedule. A. Foundation: 1. %of footings excavated: 70% 2. % of foundations poured: 60% 3. % of foundation walls poured: 0 4. compaction: underway B. Sewage Treatment Foundation: 1. Vertical walls have been poured. 2. Waterproofing to take place 4/14 and 4/15. 2. Site Engineering: A. SS Design provided as-built site plan for utilities, but they had to add a valve as it comes onto the site. This will be added and reissued prior to the next job meeting. B. Requested that again that SS Design have their rep tag the vegetation that the conservation commission wants removed and then replanted so that the plantings do not get destroyed. C. Update on WWTP: 1. Again we requested the metal grates, ladders, etc.. 2. Have not received shop drawings on outside work, i.e.: exhaust ductwork, roof hatch, exterior bollards and misc. metal. D. Planning board: J. Truslow advised that the additional parking has been reviewed and approved by the planning board. E. Testing: 1. Compaction: To date, it meets or exceeds the requirements. 2. Rebar: No problems have been noted in the inspection reports. I � 3. Concrete Cylinder: We received a report which showed the 7-day break reached 35,000 psi. Discussed taking an additional cylinder for the vertical walls to break in case we need to evaluate the concrete reaching 75% of its strength. 3. Shop Drawings: A. Status: 1. Elevator: We were advised that they will be available 2/22/08. Discussed the risk of proceeding with footings without this information. B. Being Reviewed: 1. cold form metal framing calcs and drawings 2. plumbing C. Returned to GC: 1. B/G pumps 4. RFI: A. DHDA provided a response to the steel RFI. 5. PCO/CO: A. Status of soil removal and replacement: GC has not received this information. Sub is working on it. B. Hollow Core Doors: Discussed and determined that the credit was not worthwhile so we will riot go forward with this. C. Interior designer provided a marked up lighting submission, which stated that she wants the finish on the light fixtures to match the hardware which is brass. GC indicated that he is not sure that all of the fixtures come in a brass finish. GC to look into this. GC indicated that the information provided is not adequate for review. It only has a scribbled note on the first cut.' It does not give specifics about the change and who approved it. GC cannot be responsible when there is not more information on the change requested. D. When DHDA returned that ACT submission, the Dunes Second Look was specified by the interior designer. This is not a fire-rated tile. We have discussed this on two other projects. Consequently, the GC will have to t change to a 2 x 2 Second Look which will require an added cost. DHDA asked that J. Truslow pass this information along to the interior designer so that this issue does not arise on other projects. 6. ASI: Three (3) ASIs require a response. A. RFI #18 , showers, 6" curb: DHDA to contact engineers. ADA has no curb. B. RFI #19, water stop: Discussed and GC has the information they need to proceed. 7. Job super provided his look ahead. Nauset will be working on Saturday as reflected on the look ahead. J. Truslow explained to those in attendance that it is essential that the construction pick up speed so that the project can be completed on time. It appears that the schedule is slipping. Construction Coordination 1. There are no problems with interference with the operations were reported. 2. J. Truslow requested that DHDA follow up on 12 nurse calls for this project as he will be on vacation. 3. Structural steel to be delivered in May. Next week we will receive a lay down plan showing the location of the storage. 4. J. Teixeira requested CAD files of engineering drawings from the engineer. 5. Discussed the color selections required for'the contractor to release his materials. DHDA stated that we had provided Wellesley Design this information early on in the project and once again emailed the floor plans, interior elevations, millwork details, etc. to Wellesley Design. 6. Next meeting 4/17/08 at 9:30 am. If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise, this report shall stand as written. April 17, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Tony Papantonis Al Deluca Kevin Scrima Jon Teixeira David Dunlap , Purpose: Review progress of project. Weather: 63 degrees and sunny. Construction Administration 1. Project Schedule: A. Discussed that the project needs to be expedited to complete the foundation on or before May 5th so it will be ready for setting structural steel. In order to achieve this Nauset advised that they are going to do the following: 1. Foundation contractor will be working 6 days/week, 12 hrs/day. 2. Additional crew of labors are required in order to strip the foundations so that the contractor can form the remaining portions of the-foundations instead of stripping the forms themselves.- Tony stated that he would call the foundation contractor. 3.- Tony advised that he wants the beams on top of existing roof to be formed and poured a week earlier than scheduled so that they will be ready for structural steel as well. Once implemented, this will push the super's look ahead a week earlier. This type of thinking needs to be continued throughout the project. It is in everyone's best interest to complete the project at the earliest possible time. B. The WWTP equipment is scheduled for delivery the second week of May. C. Job super's Look Ahead: An updated look ahead will be provided to the owner and architect reflecting the above. 2. Site Engineering: A. As-built utility drawings have not been completed as of this date. B. Vegetation has been tagged around the new parking spaces. C. Update on shop drawings: none received on steel decking, ladders, roof hatch, etc. 3. Testing: Testing has been ongoing. 4. Shop Drawings: A. Status: 1. Elevator shop drawings are scheduled for the week of 4/21/08. 2. Cold Form Metal: Reviewed by the structural engineer. DHDA is marking up coordination issues on fireproof blocking to be incorporated into the framing. To be sent to GC April 17, 2008. B. Lighting Fixtures: PM indicated that not all of the lights will be able to match the brass finish requested by the interior designer. Contractor to advise if any of these fixtures are in common areas. 5. PCO/CO: A. PCO #6 is outstanding. DHDA is to review. 6. ASI: A. DHDA issued ASI #10 responding to foundation questions. Construction Coordination - 1. No interference with the operations has been reported. 2. Job super indicated that the construction parking is in the designated areas. 3. DHDA is requesting information on the E-Call systems from 12 manufacturers. Some of these manufacturers are slow in getting back to DHDA. I j 4. Status of interior color selection: Interior designer was provided a full set of construction documents including the specifications where materials are listed along with the addendums. I GC indicated that he needs the color selections before any items can be released for fabrication. Expediting these selections would assist in receiving materials in a timely manner. 5. GC requested that reinforced masonry be substituted for the poured-in-place concrete at the elevator shaft. Structural engineer to determine this. If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing within ten days' receipt; otherwise, this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. k ' I . I Of Massachusetts J, 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 04/02/2008 Report No. 13 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Sunny, 39-56 degrees .TIME: 6: 30 AM CONTACT:Al DeLuca of Nau'set Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location - (Feet) 1 7.4 133.7 131'.4 98.3 D & 7 line. Bottom of footing 2 7.7 133.7 131.0 98.0 E & 7 line 3 7.2 133.7 132.1 98.8 D & 8 line 4 7.2 133.7 133.0 99.5 E & 8 line 5 7.0 133.7 132.4 99.0 E & 9 line 6 7.0 133.7 132.6 99.2 D & 9 line OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to .observe soil operations. and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Interior footings on D-line and E-lihe were excavated and compacted. A total of six compaction tests were performed using a sand cone in accordance with ASTM D1556. All six tests exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. Excavation along G-line, 9-line and 10-line is in progress.^ These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 04/02/2008 Report No. 13 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs., Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko p UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,.Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Davit.. Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 04/02/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 13 105 .Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare- Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Apr 07 06 09. 10P p.4 ^° J I i ® y y / E p� eD �Z I y� �� m V C ,D 7 ,\ ^ 0 E - Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice).781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/28/2008 Report No. - 12 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-122�7 WEATHER: Cloudy, 41 degrees .TIME: 6 :30 AM CONTACT:Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.9 133.7 132.3 99.0 See sketch Bottom of footing 2 5.9 133.7 132.8 99.3 " 11 3 5.6 133.71 131.6 98.4 " 9 1 5.6 133.7 132.0 98.7 " OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Footing excavation is continuing along 6-line and G-line. Four coompaction tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D1556 using the sand cone method. All test results exceeded 980 of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. Eighty yards of concrete were placed in the Treatment Facility slab and, C- line footings. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. rInspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Repoli Date 03/28/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 12 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Mar 31 08 04:50a p.7 - 1 • .4- J p, N I q 3� z 0 C. Oi D /1 C 'r I� a M r j � _ ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/27/2008 Report No. 11 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset construction WEATHER: Partly cloudy, 31-45 degrees TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT:A1 DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, Plate compactor TEST METHOD: ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.8 133.7 131.3 98.2 See sketch Floor slab base 2 5.4 133.7 132.2 98.9 " 3 5.4 133.7 131.7 98.5 " OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Footing excavation is continuing along 6-line and G-line. The south end of the Was Treatment Plant had to be re-graded and compacted. Three compaction tests were performed using the sand cone method in accordance with ASTM D1556. Testing results were in excess of 98% of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. These observations and test results were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/27/2008 Report No. 11 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. . project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centervil: Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction ■ cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko ■ I UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/27/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 11 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Mar 31 08 04:49a P 4 - i ` I J _rn ' - 0 a 6 3� 0 S, � 1 it Z �m % D P. n m o , r . f Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/24/2008 Report No. 10 Job Number 11670 ' David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 ' Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 � ' WEATHER: Sunny, 27-45 degrees .TIME: 6 : 30 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT. #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate .compactor - TEST METHOD. ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.7 133.7 131.6 98.4 See sketch _17' 2 5.4 133.7 131.2 98.1 " 3 5.4 133.7 132.3 99.0 " OBSERVATIONS: purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as - _ - _. nerc.g.garv. The following was observed: Excess fill is being removed from the building pad area between D-line and G-line. A section of 3- line to 6-line was excavated and compacted and three compaction tests were performed using the sand cone method according to ASTM D1556. Ali test results exceeded 95% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. Rebar is being installed along C-line from 6-line to 9-11ne. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time i. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. f Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing Peop W Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/24/2008 Report No. 10 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Job Number 1167 0 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerviil_e Attn: David Dunlap . . 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon. Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn:) John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/24/2008" Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 10 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervi'_le Attachment Mar 27 08 04:41a P.3 S�)u, ® d � O 00_ C Q O z C� D % 1 N o n r- Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/21/2008 Report No. g Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nau set Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Sunny, 30-41 degrees .TIME: 7 : 30 AM CONTACT: A1 DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD. ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 6.7 132.6 132.2 99.7 See sketch Bottom of footing 2 7.0 132.6 130.2 98.2 3 7.2 132.6 131.0 98.8 " 4 7.2 132.6 131.4 99.1 " 5 6.8 132.6 130.9 98.7111 OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: .Plumbing pipes were being installed in the Wastewater Treatment Facility between A-line and C-line. The excavated footings from 6-line to 9-line along C-line became saturated from yesterday's rain. The saturated sections were removed and replaced with dry processed gravel. The area was re-compacted and five compaction tests were performed using a sand cone according to ASTM D1556. All five tests exceeded 98% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. Soil and gravel continued to be removed between C-line and G-line. These observations and test results were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People_ Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/21/2008 Report No. 9 Job Number 11670 ' David Dunlap Associates, Inc. project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap` 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs.' Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira, Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/21/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. g 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Mar 23 08 05:28p. p. 16 a , 4 _ (nC� I m n 7 � 7 q O N 7 M• � a)n i� \ > /. CJ \,�,� av n r-- C I i Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/20/2008 Report No. 8 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Rain, 41-45 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: A1 DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density te sts EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat; plate compactor TEST METHOD: ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 6.6 133.7 132.0 98.7 See sketch -16' 2 6.3 133.7 131.3 98.2. -15' OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necesar.y. The following was observed: Only limited site work was being performed today because of the wet gravel conditions. The elevator pad was backfilled and compacted with onsite gravel. Two 'compaction tests were performed according to ASTM D1556 using a sand cone. Test results exceeded 95% compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/20/2008 Report No. 8 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction ■ cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko M UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/20/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 8 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Mar 23 08 05: 27p p. 10 eb f V f y In cry 7 - j + (C a O s � i C r �r i M tv_ 1 r O � / n D —I 3 � z m a S'` r C) i C 1. `T1 c n m -� r Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/18/2008 Report No. 7 - Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap al 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Sunny, 29-41 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location Elevation 7.0 132.6 131.1 98.9 ..See sketch -16.0' (Feet) 7.8 132.6 130.6 98.5 " 6.9 132.6 130.9 98.7 OBSERVATIONS: ne r,urpose of this v.i sir_ to ohser,,e _ni_1 nnc_ar_nnc and f_eld d ,si .. �-,Y rests a:. necessary. the followIrg was observed: Footing excavation is continuing on C-line and D-line from 9-line to 10-line. After the area was excavated, processed gravel was placed in six inch compacted lifts to produce a step footing. Three compaction tests were performed by the sand cone method according to ASTM D1556. Test results exceeded 985: compaction of the modified proctor. per ASTM D1557. Excess material is being removed from the building pad area. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Name Premium Travel Time Hours. Time Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. x cc: Radius Management Svcs. inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nail.set Constru—i_nn ro,p. Attn: ichn UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Page 2 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date /_,=�� p o3/1a/2ooa �n: D avid Dunlap Report No. 7 a0 vdebster Street, „ S '-Le 2 Job Number 1, -� Hano•.er, MA 02339-122-7 1e10 Attachment Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville !8' 04: 16a P.6 I3 — < Zz 0 i �4 ..c r W � �\ C i Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/17/2008 Report No. 6 Job Number 1167.0 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare David Dunlap C tr. ,Centervi.Ile 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Partly cloudy, 28-39 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: [],inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent No. Moisture Elevation Density Density Compaction Location 6.7 129.8 128.1 98.7 See sketch (Feet) - 6.5 1-29.8 128.6 99.1 6.5 129.8 127.5 98 1 1. - 3 29.8 -128.0 98.6 ' -17.0' 6,4 129.8 127.7 98.4 , 7.9 132.E 130.6 16.5' 7 1 132 -16.0 OBSERVATIONS: . "'he purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The .following was observed: -line was over-excavated to remove unsuitable fill high inorganic material. It was backfilled in six .nch compacted lifts with dense grade and structural processed gravael. Seven compaction tests were Percormed. using a sand cone in accordance with ASTM D1556. The first five tests were performed on the jense grade fill and the last two tests were performed on the processed gravel. All seven tests _xceeded 98` compaction of the modified proctor per ASTM D1557. The proctor for the last two tests was provided by P. A. Landers who supplied" the gravel. !'hese observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Name Premium Travel Time FHours Time J. Grocer- No Mar. Day 3 Hr(s) 'EVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser J " II Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' . Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/17/2008 Report No. 6 Job Number 11.670 David Dunlap Associates, inc Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerf Attn: David Dunlap ille 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction ,Our. reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Planagement Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow NausBt CCnstruc=ion Corp. Attn: John Te;L ei_ag r- UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Page 3 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/17/2008 rtn: David Dunlap Report No. 6 1.05 Webster_ Street, Suite 2 Job Number 1160 Hanover, HA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment M 08 04: 14a c, s� IV, 1<1 I N r W I L - Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Pagel . 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)791-438-6216(Fax). Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/14/2008 Report No. 5 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Partly cloudy, 35-40 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: #320 excavator, Bobcat, plate compactor TEST METHOD: ® Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent Elevation No. Moisture Density Density Compaction Location (Feet) 1 5.2 133.7 131.5 98.4 See sketch Base of slab 2 5.4 133.7 130.5 97.6 " 3 9.8 133.7 129.4 96.8 OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Removal of unsuitable materials is continuing at the building pad area between D and G lines. The water- 'treatment building between 3-line and 6-line was compacted and three compaction tests were performed using the sand cone method according to ASTM D1556. Test results exceeded 95% compaction of ,the modified proctor. Structural fill is being placed along C-line from 6-line to 9-line. This will be compacted and tested on Monday. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Of Ma' ssachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/14/2008 Report No. 5 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction , Cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko ■ UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/14/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 5 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency .Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment M ' 7 il 04:41a p.6 I f� . . w -� ,/41 I - I � - l I II i t i r j T: 1 Z' `� Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 0 3/13/2 0 0 8 Report No. 4 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Sunny, 29-40 degrees .TIME. 7 : 00 AM CONTACT:Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction EQUIPMENT: #320C excavator, Bobcat TEST METHOD: ❑ Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ® inspector ❑ Staff Engineer 9� El Engineer i OBSERVATIONS: The purpose of this visit was to observe soil operations and perform field density tests as necessary. The following was observed: Topsoil, subsoil and unsuitable materials were being removed from the building pad area and the unsuitable materials were being trucked off site. Excavation continued down to minus 19 feet from C- line to D-line between 6-line and 9-line. An area between 3-line and 6-line was also being excavated for Wastewater Treatment building. Nothing was compacted today so no testing was performed. These observations were related to Mr. DeLuca prior to departure. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time I Hours Time J. Grocer No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/10/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number i 167 0- David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, suite 2 Hanover., MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Clear, 35 degrees .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: A1 DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction EQUIPMENT: Cat excavator, 10 wheel dump TEST METHOD: ❑ Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ® Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer OBSERVATIONS: This report follows a site visit to inspect earthwork for foundation subgrade. Its contents were discussed with Mr. DeLuca during this visit. At the time of this visit footing excavation continued along column line C to approximately 3'0" below bottom of footing elevation removing .organic subsoils to natural dense sand subgrade. Geotechnical engineer of record to visit site this afternoon to review the presence of organic soil within the building footprint. A field sketch is enclosed for review. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Kielty . No Min Day 3 Hr(s; REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. inc, Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Tnc. Report Date 03/?012008 Attn: Davic Dunlap Report No. 3 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA. 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment ;11/ 008 19:36 4012701416 J N M FAX PAGE 02/05 Cft Fr P� v iftiDU)µ N(n r—MX � �9 tASvnVf / :jo z X� -C oA Foor�NG e-XeAv.AT1dk) CoNTt,VvCS Tp !o: APPRoX, 3/^6,. - � RE�ot�3 E�EVgT►o,v REMOV1AJC oRGAN�c s�85o/c To A ATORAL SAAJD j• - � � Sc�BGR,IDE i 1 • U7S FIELD SKEre-H 63rio-08 Z, k,.jCLTy L Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/07/2008 Report No. 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 , Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: Sun/clouds .TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction EQUIPMENT: Cat excavator, 10 wheel dump TEST METHOD. ❑ Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ® Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer OBSERVATIONS: At the time of this visit footing excavation began along column line C. At approximate bottom of footing elevation, a dense black organic layer. of approximately 1 thick with roots and fibrous peat was encountered overlaying approximately 2' of orange/brown organic subsoil. This 3' organic layer appears to extend westerly into the proposed building footprint. At the footing location, excavation was carried down to the natural dense sand subgrade and will be filled and compacted back to B.O.F. elevation at a later date. Geotechnical.engineer of record should evaluate the presence of organic material below proposed slab on grade. A field sketch is enclosed. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Kielty No Max Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. .Please email us at reports@utso£mass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 o Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/07/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 2 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment J3/07/2008 19:32 4012701416 J N M FAX PAGE 03/04 p v { 1 v>`n� \ \ xVCD C�N /• �I v C) 0 �� /— � X 80 ' yQnc ¢� #1 Ch r 4 � ,� * Ip Mg a opa.a oC)=9 { can $ D �M _ /.• � 0 �zg �ou�mi c Q ZXv ,$ z p A = w N C_ � C �O O: N {a _ X . CCD-qS� , _ I 0 ♦ V P Cf VC M 7o t L z " mxnCIA (AA �g � f = a N m Q j 7° y z o N i e- $9 } nrn 4 I o' Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 03/06/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 WEATHER: Clear, 40 degrees -TIME: 7 : 00 AM CONTACT: Al DeLuca of Nauset Construction PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction EQUIPMENT: None-previously prepared to B.O. F. elevation and compacted with a plate compactor. TEST METHOD: ❑ Sand Cone ❑ Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ® Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer OBSERVATIONS: This report follows a site visit to inspect earthwork for footing base. Its contents were discussed with Mr. DeLuca during this visit. Excavation was complete at proposed wastewater facility to bottom of footing elevation exposing a dense F/M light brown sand which appeared to have been proof compacted using a plate compactor. All locations found to be firm and stable and suitable for placement of concrete footing/slab on grade.,, Writer spoke with geotechnical engineer of record via phone to confirm subgrade observations. No problems were observed. -A field sketch is enclosed for review. The earthwork inspected during this visit does conform to geotechnical report of O'Reilly, Talbot and Oken dated 02-21-07 and project specifications 02200. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Kielty No Min Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira UT S of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 03/06/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 1 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil Attachment )3/06/2008 18:07 4012701416 J N M FAX PAGE 06/06 d Z 2�N 1 � / M Y Z p • � tr Ll W m + /'� m (A X a ••/ Ar Cvo-a va a rN `� �.• z A= ;� U in � z M N 2 Z v Q° :C z _ r 4. r O � A CRI wZ mp ' R O Z O � 1A � � 14 p o► g .� r 'C� R1D1 v 4. 4 z p D N GO X. o rt31 m4A ° -00 G 1 W ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 02/27/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA . 02339-1227 WEATHER: .TIME: CONTACT: SUMMARY: Transported 1 soil sample (Source: onsite borrow from: north of existing building) to the lab for testing. GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time W. Wright No REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Y M 0• Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Pagel 5 Richards-on Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/29/2008 Report No. 6 David Dunlap Associates, Inc.. Job Number 11670 Attn : David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerviil 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover,- MA 023 3 9- 122 7 Contractor Nauset Construction Sample Submitted By Sample No. 58 ❑ Our Representative: warren Wright Date Submitted: El Other: 02/27/08 Source of Sample On-Site Existing @ location: North of existing building „ ❑ Off-Site Borrow from: Proposed use: Back-if i l l Material Submitted As: 71 Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.01 .0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1 .03 .0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1 .03.1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: " ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1..11 .0 ❑ Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01 .0 ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01 .7 ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: ❑ Other: Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ❑X Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability ❑X Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification:Silty sand with gravel Project Specification Conformance Result ❑ Does conform: ❑ Does NOT conform: ❑ Marginally does not*conform...Basis: *We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval b the Arc ect and the Engineers-of-Record. 0 No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department Of Massachusetts "The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham; MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/29/2008 Report No. 6 David Dunlap Associates, ' Inc . Job Number 1.1670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervill 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira t ■ 1 t;TS of Massachusetts, Inc. 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Page 3R David Dunlap Associates, in'-, Report e2 p /29/2008 Attr: David Dunlap Report No. 16 105 Glebster Screet, Suite 2 Job Number 11570 Hanover, pn,A 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Hea!C care r,l r. Centervi.l le Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report 90 i �o BO I i 70 I t I i W 601 Z I Z 50 W Y � I W 40 ICI , i 30 20 0 SOC -NCO IT t� G.t obt GRAIN SIZE-mm COBBLES °/GRAVEL SAND -.._._.---. %SILT 0.0 -` %CLAY 1 .4 62.9 SIEVE PERCENT I SPEC.' i PASS? SIZE FINER' j, 'rERCENT X=NO Material Description I F-NI SX D SOME.SILT LITTLE GRAVEL in. i 100.0 1.5 itt. g{._ 1 in. 95.< 3,4 in I 9:.9 3 S in. S 1.5 Atterbe Limits F4 I 54.6 PL= CL_ ro= pi. =1r1 S0.> r 0 68.6 Coefficients -50 a5.Q p85= 1 f60- 0.567 D50= 0.36 10 Cu- 0.1 0 3 .6 I 30= 15= D10= =2 0 I ? Cc= Classification USCS= S\•I AASHTO= Remarks i i . iris>prcilicaUun pritviilctll Sample No.: ;` Source of Sample. NORTH OF F\I.ST.HL:00. , Location: Date: 02-_,9__008 Elev./Depth i UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. T Client: Nil SF.fCO\'STRUCTION 5 Richardson Lane Project: C:\PF RF..GF..NC1"HEALTHCARE C'N IlZ-CE\"rER\:'ILLI_,"i� i UTS of Massachusetts, inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) I Da-✓id Dunlap AssnclaLes, Inc. Report Date 02/29/2003 At'Ln: David Dunlap Report No. 'o i 0 5 Olebster Street, SUice 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, PnA 02339-.1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare� Attachment COMPACTION TEST REPORT Curve No.:58 FProjectNo.: 11670 Project: CAPE REGENCY HEALTH CARE CNTR.-CEN"fERv1LLE. 9;, Date: 02-29-2008 Location: Elev./Depth: Sample No. 58 Remarks: NORTH OF EXIST.BI.DG. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Description: F-nd SAND SOME S11,1 LITTLE GRAVEL. Classifications- USCS: AASHTO: Nat.Moist._ Sp.G._ 2.75 Liquid Limit= Plasticity Index= %>NO.4= 15.410 - %<No.200= 21.7% ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS 7�28. NCORRECTED -- \iacimum dry densi v li3.i pcf " �7 cfOptimum moisture 6.0"'o 140 Test specification: AST'v1 D 1557-91 Procedure A.Modified Oversize correction applied to each point 130 120 -- 100%SATURATION CURVES FOR SPEC, GRAV EQUAL TJ 2.8 110 � i ----_-- 2.7 a - 2.6 p 100 - i f i 80 . i 70 _ 0 5 10 f i 15 20 25 30 35 40 Water content. 9' Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People- Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/27/2008 Report No. 5 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 11.670 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Sample Submitted By Sample No. 35 Our Representative: Len Crabtree Date Submitted: 02 1 5'0s Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: Off-Site Borrow from: PA Landers, 1/21' washed crushed stone Proposed Use: Below septic systern Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1,01.0 (Sha1.1 be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD Ml.03 .0 Type ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1 .03.1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1.11 .c ❑ Crushed Stone: MHD M2.0i.0 ❑ •Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01.7 ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: 0 Other: washed stone Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ❑X Gradation Analysis El Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: 1/211 crushed washed stone Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: ❑ Does NOT conform: ❑ Marginally does not*conform...Basis: " We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. a No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department - 0 f Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing PeopW Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/27/2008 Report No. 5 David Dunlap Associates, inc . Job Number 1167.0 Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervil.le 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management sves. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslol Nauset Construction Corp- Attn: John Teixeira i R UTS Of Massachusetts, Inc. 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781.438-6216(Fax) Page 3 David Dunlap Associates, Attn: David Dunlap Inc. Report Date 02/27/2008 Report No. 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA. 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Particle Size Distribution Rep77� F no l an 70 so I 1i I - I L.. i w Z w -I ( Z 50 w tY w 40 a 3020 L_.._. I 10 01 soo 10010 :.�.. of 1 .01 GRAIN SIZE-mm 0 0.001 COBBLES %GRAVEL - _ %SAND 0.0 _ %SILT 8 i.8 '/,CLAY SIEVE PERCENT SPEC." PASS? SIZE FINER Material Description PERCENT (X=NO) 1'2"CRUSHED WASHED STONE 3/4 in. 100.0 in. 996 3!8 in. 75_7 #4 I2.2 Atterbero Limits q 16 I p-3 PL= LL= P1= Coefficients D85= 10.6 D60= 3.11 D50= 7.35 CU� ]95.99 C�$ 1067 D10= 1.16 Classification - USCS= AASHTO= Remarks :1.ASHTO T11-91 PROCEDU IREA'I'HE PERCENT f fNit R THAN 1'HF.NO.200 SIEVE IS 0.4%. (no spcafi�atinn provdedj - - Sample No.: .ii Source of Sample: PA LANDERS. 1,2" WASHED Location: .' Date:. —=- ----- Elev./Depth: UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. II Client: NAUS rcO1 STRUCTlO ` _ — 5 Richardson Lane I Project: CAPE REGENCY-cENTF..RVII..LE,�lA Stoneham, MA 02180 F 0 Of Massachusetts "The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/27/2008 Report No. 4 David Dunlap Associates, Iric . Job Number 11670 Attn : David Dunlap Project Cape Regency He Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 023 39-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Sample Submitted By Sample No. 33 0 Our Representative: Len Crabtree Date Submitted: 02/15/08 Ell_Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: 0 Off-Site Borrow from: PA Landers, 1 1/2" crushed washed Proposed Use: Below septic system Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.01.0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1 .0.3.0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1.03.1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1.11.0 ❑ Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01 .0 ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01.7 ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: Other: washed stone Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ❑X Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor, ❑ Permeability Q Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: 1 1/2" crushed washed stone Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: ❑ Does NOT conform: ❑ . Marginally does not{conform 9 Y ...Basi s. We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. 0 No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department Of Mi�ssachusetts "The Construction Testing People® Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 02/27/2008 Report No. 4 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Job Number 12670 Attn: David Dunlap . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street , Suite 2 Hanover, MA . 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction ` cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslew Nauset construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira 4 UTS of Massachusetts, inn. rage 3 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Tnc. Report Date 02/2'%/2008 A.ttn : David Dunlap Report No. 4 105 Webster Street, Suite Job Number 1167,0 Hanover, MA. 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. , Cente.rville . Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report 100 1 80 70 j I - t I tY I ' Ilj z i LL 50 Z - Ir u.1 40 _1_ 30 i. 20 10OIL 500 100 . Ot GRAIN SIZE-mm G. 0,001 COBBLES _ %GRAVEL %SAND 0.0 — _-..._ _- %SILT I %CLAY SIEVE PERCENT I SPEC.' PASS? SIZE FINER PERCENT Material Description (X=N0) 1 1!2"CRUSHED WASHED STONE 1.5 in. — 100.0 1 Tin. 97.7 1 in. 75.5 3!4 in. 19.9 I 1.2 in. 1.1 Atterbera LimitS $in. 0.6 I PL= LL= PI- Coefficients I D85= 27.3 D60= 23.3 D50= 22.3 D30= 20.2 D15= 17.1 D10= 15.4 Cu= 152 Cc= I.14 Classification USCS= AASHTO= Remarks k' AASI-ITO T 1 1-95 PROCEDURE A THE PERCENT FINER THAN THE N0.200 SIEVE IS 0.1%. L, !no*eii fiea0nn pro,ided l Sample No.: 33 Source of Sample: PA LANDERS, 1 I:`2"WASHED r Location: Date: - _7 2()O8 Elev./Depth: Ii UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC -- Cliff lent-NAUSETCONSTRUCTION "l 5 Richardson Lane Project: CAPE RECE�"CY-CEUTERVII.I,F,NIA Stoneham, MA 02180 �� P.n;pr►IQ— _ Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane Stoneham MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 Fax • Soil TestingResults - Transmittal ttal Report Report date o f/o7/2 0 0 8 Report No. 3 Job Number. 11670 David Dunlap Associates, In- Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ;Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02 3 3 9-12 2 7 Contractor . Nauset construction Sample Submitted By Sample No. .937. ❑ Our Representative: Ned Callahan_ Date Submitted; of/02/o8 _❑ Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: Off-Site Borrow from: 3/4" washed stone Proposed Use: Backfi11 per drawings Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD Ml.01.0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) . ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD MI.03.0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD%Ml.03.1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: 'MHD M ..11.o Q Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01.o w ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01. ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: ❑ Other: Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ❑X Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability ❑ Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: crushed stone Project Specification Conformance Results r ❑ Does conform: 0 Does NOT conform`. MHD M2.01+4, for 3/4" crushed stone, percent passing the '3/4" sieve is low by 3 9°s •:Marginally does not*conform...Basis: *We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-,of-Record. ❑ No Specifications provided to our office. 0 Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. Sample submitted without indication of intended°use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department Our reports are available-'in*PDiFform via' email. : Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information° is Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number 11670 a David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02.339=1227 Contractor Nauset construction • Cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp." Attn: John-Teixeira UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inca Report Date 01/07/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 3 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 .lob Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report 100 I : 90 r I, 80 �.—70 j it i IIw 60 Z T_ LL i Z 50 W 30 20 10 01 500 100 10 1,. 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE-mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND SILT %CLAY 0.0 98.5 1 1.5 SIEVE i PERCENT I SPEC." PASS? i Material Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) CRUSHED STONE 1 in. 100-0 3i4 in. 86.1 lit in. 12.1 3/8 ma 1.5 Atterberg Limits PL= LL= PI_ Coefficients D85= 18.9 D60= 16.4 D50= 15.7 D30= 14.2 D15= 13.0 D10= 11.9 Cu= 1.38 Cc= 1.03 Classification USCS= AASHTO Remarks I i I fno.peciticalion provided) Sample No.: 937 Source of Sample: 3/4"WASHED STONE Date: 01-07-2008 Location: Elev./Depth: UTS_ OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. Client: NAUSET CONSTRUCTION 5 Richardson Lane i Project: CAPE REGENCY-CE.NTERviLLE,IMA Stoneham, MA 02180 Project No: Figure 937 Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report. Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number 116 7 0 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset construction Sample Submitted By Sample No. 937 ® Our Representative: Ned Callahan Date Submitted: 01/02/08 ❑ Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: ® Off-Site Borrow from: 3/4" washed stone Proposed Use: Backfill per drawings Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1:01.0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1.03.0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1.03.1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1.11.0 ® Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01.0 ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01.7 ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: ❑ Other: Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ® Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability ❑ Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: crushed stone Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: ® Does NOT conform: MHD M2.01 A for 3i4" crushed stone, percent passing the 3/4" sieve is low by 3. 9% ❑ Marginally does not"conform...Basis: We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record: ❑ No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department I Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 3 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc..Attn: David Dunlap project cape Reg ency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville . 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction .Corp. Attn: John Teixeira UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 01/07/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 3 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centervi 1 Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report E 100 - = - s = a R `a - I 90 :1-.. r I , 70 I I I w 60 LL i Z 50 Lu v w 4° ;I i Q. 30 4 2°10 a- I , 11' 0 500 100 I . 10 1 01 GRAIN SIZE-mm 0.1 0. 0.001 %COBBLES %GRAVEL /e o O.O 98 SAND %SILT o .5 /o CLAY 1.5 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' I PASS? Material Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) CRUSHED STONE I in. 100.0 .861 1 13/4n. 1/2 in. 1 3 in. 2.5 i »4 1.5 Atterbera Limits PL= LL= PI= Coefficients j I D85= 18.9 D60= 16.4 D50= 15.7 Cu0-i 1382 CC5=110.0 D10= 11.9 Classification USCS= AASHTO= LL Remarks i i (no specification provided) Sample No.: 937 Source of Sample: 314"WASHED STONE Location: Date: 01-07-2008 Elev./Depth: UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. Client: NAUSET CONSTRUCTION 5 RlChardSOrl Lane Project: CAPE REGENCY-CENTERVILLE;MA � f Massachusetts "The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham; NIA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date o1i"07; ;0 0 . Report No. 2 David Du_n_1ap A;ssoCi a; 8, I e Job Number 11570 p_ Attu . Dai>id Dun!ap Project 105 Webster Street , Su.i le 2 Hanover, fit . 02339--1227 Contractor Nause Sample Submitted By Our Representative: Sample No. 936 . s � ;.,-.J .._.a?_,,�,__ I! O ther: Date Submitted: � ;; 08_ - - Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: 0 Off-Site Borrow from: I i%= ash_ , ,to- Proposed Use: B r rril -i rer dam_,,,; Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: , ❑ Ordinary Borrow: Shu-1.1 be _ a� a - Ar,, - ❑ Gravel Borrow: LL N,_,o ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course + ?�D r_ _ ❑ Sand Borrow: t°:ter ti?I _ _ . � __,.e. ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: M7 r r i^ Crushed Stone: ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course. =L . ❑ Common BorrowEl : Drainage Fill: EJ Other Requested Testin a r, ,. _.._ .....� `.y ❑ Atterberg Limits Q Gradation Analysis❑ _ ti A ❑ Hydrometer Modified Proctor LI Permeability ❑ Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: crushed -tone Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: ❑ Does NOT conform: :2 .ui . _ `or _ ,;z - 4Der:�:1� - ❑ Marginally does not* conform...Basis: We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. ❑ No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample su bmitted P without indic ation ion of intended use and without specifications. 3ENERALREMARKS: EVIEWED BY: o ,; 1 -_ A Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-775.5 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date r,1 ;07;-CGS Report No. a rid Dunlap ssv, t� rr Job Number i1 s Attn : David Dunl a� . Project Cate 105 Webster � y � cui�= 2 Hanover, INiA 023 9-1GL j Contractor Na.,.;sec. Cans an cc: 5'adius pia - UTS of Massa- L;sei 5, ;1_1c. 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham. MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781=438-6216(Fax) Page 3 ,.I Report Date Report No. _. r _- Job Number _: :, �_ Project Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report + 100 � i I W 60 - .....--... UL L L W -- a 30I .. - .-.._... I i i 201 GRAIN SIZE- p COBBLES °%GRAVEL m i1 0Gi SAND % SILT '%CLAY i II SIEVE -'I E'Ii"Vnn ..E PERCENT E NT SPEC.' I iPASS? SIZE FINER o-= ij -Material ter_ia_l DesI cri ti a CR;;SHED SO\i)0 Oh.6 Atterbe Limits�Coefficientsp5= 36. 6_030- ;gy C - 6.4 Dic._c1 1 ry;rl II ii` IUSCS= Classification AAS.HTG- i I Remarks ( i Sample No.: ---� Location: Source of Sample: H T(i\R 1 Date: —Elev./Depth UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS,,INC I! client s1,rc ov,Ti,1 . rI{ -' 5 Richardson Lane Project. I'r K i 4. I StOnPhnm AA A n114 n.,. - Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People" Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice),.781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Sample Submitted By Sample No. 936 . ® Our Representative: Ned Callahan Date Submitted: 01/02/08 F- Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: ® Off-Site Borrow from: 1 1/2" washed stone Proposed Use: Backf ill per drawings Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.01.0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1.03.0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1.03.1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD Ml.11.0 _ ® Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01.0 ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01.7 ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: ❑ Other: Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ® Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability ❑ Wash Sieve Analysis _ ❑ Other: Material Classification: Crushed stone Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: ® Does NOT conform: MHD M2.01.1 for 1 1/2" crushed stone, percent passing the 1" sieve is 'low by 2 4.5 0 ❑ Marginally does not`conform...Basis: We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. ❑ No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department of Massachusetts _ 'The Construction Testing People Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) e Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report 01/07/2008 Date Report No.Dat 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, 'Suite 2 Contractor Nauset Construction Hanover, MA 02339-1227 cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira t Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People® Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 78.1-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax), Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/200.8 . Report No. 2 Job Number 1167 0 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project., Cape Re Attn: David Dunla gency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville x 105 Webster Street`, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1'22 Contractor Nauset-.Construction cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inca Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira s it } r UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, , Inc. Report Date 01/07/2008 Attu: David Dunlap Report No. 2 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. , Centervil Attachment E Particle Size Distribution Report 100 a � I 90 80 _ I I 70I L:i — — j LL Z 50I a 30 20 10 500 100 . 10 : 1.: 0.1 0,01 -0.001 GRAIN SIZE-mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL '• %SAND %SIL7 %CLAY 0.0 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC! PASS9 Material Description ' SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) CRUSHED STONE 2 in. 100.0 L5 in. 96,6 in. 10.5 3/4 in: I 0.8 Atterbera Limits. PL= LL= PI= Coefficients D85= 36.5 D60= 33.1 D50= 31.7 D30= 28.9 D15= 26.4 D10= 25.0 C' Cu= 1;32 Cc= 1.01 Classification _ USCS= AASHTO Remarks I (no specification provided). Sample No.: 936 Source of Sample: 1 1r2"WASHED STONE - Date: r41-07-2008 Location: " Elev./Depth; f UTS OF.MASSACHUSETTS, INC. Cllent: NAU SET CONSTRUCTION 5 RlChardSOn Lime Project: CAPE REGENCY-CENTERVILLE,MA I Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 7817438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 . Hanover, MA 023,39-1227 Contractor Nauset construction Sample Submitted By Sample No. 936 Our Representative: Ned Callahan Date Submitted: - 01/02/08 ❑ Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: 0 Off-Site Borrow from: 1 1/211 washed stone Proposed Use: Backe ill' per drawings Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.01.0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1.03.0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course:' MHD •M1.03 1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: . ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD_ M1.11.o R ❑X Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01.o ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01. El Common Borrow: " ❑ Drainage Fill: ❑ Other: Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ❑X Gradation Analysis ❑.Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability ❑ Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification: Crushed stone Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: 0 Does NOT conform: MHD M2'.01.1 for 1 1/2". crushed stone, percent passing the 1" sieve is low by 24.50 . . ❑ Marginally does not*conform...Basis: *We suggest the suitability of this soil,sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. . ❑ No Specifications provided to our office Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmasss..com for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, .Inc . Attn: David Dunlap Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction. cc: Radius Management Svcs. .Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira ­UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) 'David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Repo rtDate Ol/07/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 2 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report 100 I 90 80 > e �C 70 Z LL Z 50 W � . : LU 40 r 30 20 �. 10 ` 500 100 10 1 0.1 0:01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE-mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY 0.0 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS9 Material Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) CRUSHED STONE ' 2 in. 100.0 1.5 in. 96.6 I in. 10.5 Y4 in. 0.8 Atterberg Limits . PL=. . LL= PI Coefficients D85= 36.5 D60= 33.1 D50 w 31.7 D30= 28.9, D15= 26.4 Cu= 1.32 Cc= 1.01 . Classification USCS= AASHTO= Remarks u "- Oro spcci licatiun pro%i(led) Sample No.: 936 Source of Sample: 1 PT WASHED STONE Date: 01-07-2008 Location: Elev./Death:' UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC, Client:' 'NAUSETCONSTRUCTION l 5 Richardson-Lane Project CAPE REGENCY-CENTERVILLE,MA Stoneham MA 02180 _ Project No: Figure 936 i i Of Massachusetts S, 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc . ' pro . Cape Regency Attn: David Dunlap J p 9 Y Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 r Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Sample Submitted By Sample No. 935 ❑X Our Representative: Ned Callahan Date Submitted: 01/02 j 08 ❑ Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: Off-Site Borrow from: PA Landers - Masphee Proposed Use: Structural fill Material Submitted As: 0 Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.01.0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1.03.0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: - MHD M1.03.i ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1.11.0 ❑ Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01.0 ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD ,M2.01. ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: ❑ Other: Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ❑ Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability 0 Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification:Gray gravel and sand Project Specification Conformance Results 0 Does conform: 02200-4, 2.00 A,for structural fill ❑ Does NOT conform: El Marginally does not*conform...Basis: *We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. ❑' No Specifications provided to our office. Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department Our reports are available. in PDF form via email. Please email 'us at reports@utsofmass.com for moreinformation: J Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01/07/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc: Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. ,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction • cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira • i -UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 01/07/2008 Attn: :David Dunlap Report NO. 1 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare .Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment .Particle Size Distribution Report 100 n - IA III , 90 - - I �I 80 _ 70 -- w 60LL _ f Z 50 _ W d 40 I i 1 I I 30 20 I 10 � I 500 100 : - 10 1 0.1 .0.01: -0.001 - GRAIN SIZE-mm %COBBLES %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY " 0.0 53.2 37.0 9.8 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC! PASS? Material Description SIZE FINER PERCENT rX=NO) „ F-GRAVEL AND SAND TRACE SILT 3/4 in.. 100.4 3/8 in. 67.3 #4 46.3 " 910 33.4 k Atterbe_ rg Limits #20 24.1 940 18.8 PL= LL= Pi 100 16.2 9100 Coefficients 0 19.8 0200 9.8 D 14.1 D fi0= 7.79 D50= 5.47 1 85= D30= 1.50 D15= 0.250 D10= 0.0794 1 . Cu= 97.99 Cc= 3.66 Classification ` I USCS= GP-GM AASHTO` . Remarks e , (no specification provided) Sample No.: 935 Source of Sample: PA LANDERS-MASHPHEE Date: 01-07-2008 Location: Elev./Depth: -- � UTS MASSACHUSETTS INC. Client: NAU ET co sTRucT1oN 5 Richardson Lane Project: CAPE REGENCY-C£NTERVILLE:M.4 Stoneham, MA 02180 Project No: _ Fiqure ` q.; UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Report Date 01/07/2008 Attn: David Dunlap Report No. 1 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Job Number 11670 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Project Cape Regency Healthcare. Ctr. ,Centerville Attachment COMPACTION TEST REPORT Curve No.:935 Project No.: Date: 01-07-2008 Project: CAPE REGENCY-CENTERVILLE,MA Location: Elev./Depth: Sample No. 935 Remarks: PA LANDERS-MASPHEE MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Description: F-GRAVEL.AND SAND TRACE SILT Classifications- USCS: GP-GM AASHTO:. Nat.Moist.= Sp-G.= 2.75 Liquid Limit= Plasticity Index= %>3/4 in.= 0.0% %<No.200= 9.8% ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED Maximum dry density= 129.8 pcf 129.8 pcf Optimum moisture=8.2% 8 2 oho 140 Test specification: ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure C Modified Oversize correction applied to each point 130 120 100%SATURATION CURVES FOR SPEC.GRAV..EQUAL TO: 28 2.7 a 110 L. 2.6 T i C p 100 , 90 80 -.. I 70 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Water content, % Figure a;� UTS_of Massachusetts,Inc. r a y Of Mas-soactrusetts The Construction Testing People- -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane; Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice) 781-438-6216 (Fax) - Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 0_ !0 ,/2 0 0 8 Report No. i Job Number 1 6 70 DaV1 d Dun,ap SSOC1at• S , 7nC Project ape _eg c_icy - car -- ,Cen` At i=n : David Dun!a.p - - - --- - 105 Tr7ebster Street , Sup 2 Hanover, i LA O G 3 3 -12 2 j Contractor �•jause o^s Yucr ion Sample Submitted By Sample No. 935 0_ Our Representative: Ned Cal 1 a„are Date Submitted: 0 1,/'0 2 08 ❑ Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: ❑ Off-Site Borrow from: _.1 -ande = - azsohee Proposed Use: Structi.1- _ F� I1 Material Submitted As: v t, Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: M H D 1,_.01 u S:_ai ...- JpL "o',.;e c_• =`e =cr== z ❑ Gravel Borrow: M_q3 A' .0 . ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: L IM 1 0 El Sand Borrow: :°7_D N '-0 ElReclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: i!H: iil. ,r ,f ❑ Crushed Stone: 0 ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: °i P-12 ❑ Common Borrow: Drainage Fill: ❑ Other: Requested Testing - 1 ❑ Atterberg Limits ❑X Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer Modified Proctor u Permeability U Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification:Gray gravel and sand Project Specification Conformance Results ❑X Does conform: 022 ,0-^ • co A scru,cr ._ I=1 ❑ Does NOT conform: ❑ Marginally does not* conform...Basis: We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the,Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. ❑ No Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: REVIEWED BY: - .- r. c � Of Massachusetts ®The Construction Testing People- Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 01;`0 7/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11610 David Dunlap Associates, inc . Project Cape er_ rieai- -- - - - -;�� - - Attn: David Dunlap _ - _ _ 105 Webster Street , Quite 2- Hanover, MA 0233 - 122 7 Contractor e.;n_.,. E ConYtru=ion cc. Radius ..a Ld;iement -.,-c Jo^_ irislow _ UTS Of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane; Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Report Date Report No. _ Job N 1 Number m.-L u2339---, Project -, •_ = -_'' - _ _ Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report ao, i � I _uJ I � I I 6r,I L i Z W _ ` .... W 40 j _I 20 i 0 r 500 D.G1 J.00�. GRAIN SIZE-ITim _ I io C088LES io GRAVEL ';SAND S 0.0 � c.;� _ - ---. • LAY j SIEVE PERCENT i SPEC.' PASS9 . ! � � Material Description j SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) i2AV_L AND BAUD-i:4AC_SI1 I- j :4 1 WOI 3.8 in. 6'.3 46.3 ;-0 q.l Atterberg Limits_ i -40 8.3 PL= LL= Pl= =fUU I'.4 Coefficients D85_ I4.1 DBn- 7q DS•0=' 1i D15= I Cu- �7`,'9 cc .66 I Classification I USCS= C;°-(,%! AASHTO= Remarks i I'llli>(?l'i 1111:i(I.•1?l:r;lt-':�'.tl l ___ - i . f Sample No.: 4; Source of Sample: P.A L,\DI.RS-\IA� F,I'HFF Date: Location: Elev./Depth: 'i UTS OF MASSACH!(SETTS, INC. ' Client 5 Richardson Lane Project: J UTS of Massachusetts. Inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA. 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-4 3 8 7621 6(Fax) a r_.- , Report Date Report No. _ C, Job Number c• _ , -2 Project Attachment r COMPACTION TEST REPORT • .Curve No.: 335 Project No.: Date: t"!I-U;-2ii(i3 Project: ('.-\I'E REGENC)-(-ENTFRVIL:I.E.N!A Location: Liev./Depth: Sample No. 9 Remarks! PA 1:�NDEE2S-'1ASPi-iEt- MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ! Description: %.GR; \ ��" tNG D TACESiLR "r • .:`< I ` Classifications - USCS; GP-r,r:± AASNTO: Nat. Moist. = Sp.G._ 2.7 Liquid Limit= Plasticity Index= %>314 in.= 0,0 %<No.200= 2;% " ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED t iu.ur un eosin I_LS oci I29-S . --� Op!inuur:Mnis!ure 140�— Test specification: AS I'NI D 15�7-91 Procedure C Modified Oversize correction applied to tach point 30 i i I i L01 100%SATURATION CURVES I FOR SPEC. GRAY. E,?UAL TO I 2.8 27 a i = 2.6 p 101I j _r. ._ 701 r i I � � 0 'J 15 20 25 I , Vdater content % ,;.t, elanie Martell -From: UTS of Massachusetts [reports@utsofmass.com] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 12:47 PM To: David H. Dunlap Subject: UTS Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Compressive Strength Report-Concrete No. 1 Report Date 03-28-2008 Attachments: UTS Compressive Strength Report-Concrete 03-28-2008.PDF r UTS Compressive Strength Repor... UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Our Job Number 11670 Project Name Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Report Title Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report'Date 03-28-2008 Report No. 1 1 ;. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 03/28/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape. Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ,ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 4 0 0 0# 3/4 No. Of Sets: 2 CUBIC YARDS: 80 SET 1 LOCATION: Slab waste water treatment Total Unit Slum in. 3 1/2 Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp. F. 43 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested bays (Ibs.) (psi.) Type Conc Temp F 71 H944 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/04/2008 7 35,000 2,790 4 Truck No. 240 H945 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/11/2008 14 48,000 3,820 4 Ticket No. 20477 H946 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/25/2008 28 Time 7:45 H947 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/25/2008 28 Unit Wt Ibs/cu ft Air Content(%) SET 2 LOCATION: Footin , column line C at 6-9 Total Unit Slum in. 4 Lab Size Area Date Date ,ry, Age - Load Load Fracture Air Temp. F. 46 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested Days (Ibs.) (psi.). Type Conc Temp F 72 J940 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/04/2008 7 36,000 2,870 4 Truck No. 269 J941 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/11/2008 14 48,000 3,820 1 Ticket No. 20481 J942 4 x 8 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/25/2008 28 Time 9:15 J943 4 x 8 1 12.56 Good 03/28/2008 04/25/2008 28 - Unit Wt Ibs/cu ft Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: * 2% polarset Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES � II 1 (1)Cone (2)Cone and Split (3)Cone and Shear (4)Shear (5)Columnar Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. ' v Of Massachusetts. 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 03/28/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko i ° Of`Massachusetts. 'The Construction Testing People' Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 0 3/2 8/2 0 0 8 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Concrete Co. Lawrence FIELD SUMMARY REPORT 'Total Pour: Footings, column line C at 6-9; slab & footings, waste water treatment plant Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: I Cylinder Fabrication Location: ❑ Truck Discharge Chute ® End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: ❑Curing Box ® Thermal Blanket ❑Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer ❑ Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: []Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ❑ None ❑ Other Slump Specification(in.) 2-4 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: Melanie Martell From: UTS of Massachusetts [reports@utsofmass.com] Sent: Wednesday, p April 02, 2008 12:49 PM To: David H. Dunlap Subject: UTS Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Reinforcing Steel Report No. 1 Report Date 03-25-2008 Attachments: UTS Reinforcing Steel Report 03-25-2008.PDF u UTS Reinforcing Steel Report 0... UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Our Job Number 11670 Project Name Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Report Title Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 03-25-2008 Report No. 1 1 Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson.Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 03/25/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc.Attn: David Dunlap project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset ConstructioA CONTACT: Al Deluca TIME OF INSPECTION: 7 : 00 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 3/28/08 SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 ASTM A616 Gra`de.50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS:S1 S2 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: 3/10/0 8 SHOP DRAWING(S):R1, R2 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 ' OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES X NO AREA REVIEWED: Footing, column line C at 6-9 ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED Yes No Coverage(Top X Bottom X and/or Inside Face X Outside Face X ) X Clearance X Cleanliness (heavy rust, scale,mud, dirt,oil,etc. not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying, X The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. ® The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. Two vertical bars on outside face and three vertical bars on inside face were missing. GENERAL REMARKS: All were installed prior to writer's departure. Of Massachusetts The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson.Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 03/25/2008 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J. Grocer No Mi.n Day 3 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree 4 vc Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. CC: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp. Attn: John Teixeira x Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Melanie Martell From: UTS of Massachusetts [reports@utsofmass.com] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 1:21 PM To: David H. Dunlap Subject: UTS Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Concrete Field Report No. 1 Report Date 03-31-2008 Attachments: UTS Concrete Field Report 03-31-2008.PDF UTS Concrete Field Report 03-3... UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Our Job Number 11670 Project Name-Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Report Title Concrete Field Report Report Date - - Report No. 1 1 Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Concrete Field Report Report Date 0 3/31/2 0 0 8 Report No. 1 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr. Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction WEATHER: .TIME: CONTACT: SUMMARY: Transported two sets of cylinders cast on 03/28/08 to the lab for testing. GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time L. Villani No REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree WT � ..Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko Melanie Martell From: UTS of Massachusetts [reports@utsofmass.com] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 1:21 PM To: David H. Dunlap Subject: UTS Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Reinforcing Steel Report No. 2 Report Date 03-28-2008 _ Attachments: UTS Reinforcing Steel Report 03-28-2008.PDF s'X `L.tn UTS Reinforcing Steel Report 0... UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Our Job Number 11670 Project Name Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centerville Report Title Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 03-28-2008 � .. Report No. 2 1 l ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice) 781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 03/28/2008 Report No. 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction CONTACT: Al Deluca .TIME OF INSPECTION: 6: 30 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 7 : 30 AM SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 . ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS:s1 S2 REVISION NUMBER: FATED: 3/10/08 SHOP DRAWING(S):R1, R2 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS:03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES X NO AREA REVIEWED: Slab & footings, waste water treatment ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED Yes No Coverage(Top X Bottom X and/or Inside Face X Outside Face X ) X Clearance X Cleanliness (heavy rust,scale, mud, dirt; oil,etc. not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying X ® The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. El The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. GENERAL REMARKS: water stop installed after placement. Inspector Premium Travel Name Time Hours Time J.. Grocer No R Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham,MA 02186 781-438-7755 (Voice)781-438-6216 (Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 03/28/2008 Report No. 2 Job Number 11670 David Dunlap Associates, Inc. Project Cape Regency Healthcare Ctr.,.Centervill Attn: David Dunlap 105 Webster Street, Suite 2 Hanover, MA 02339-1227 Contractor Nauset Construction .REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree W' v Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: Radius Management Svcs. Inc. Attn: Jon Truslow Nauset Construction Corp.. Attn: John Teixeira Szczurko Engineering Attn: Stan Szczurko i 1 David W. Oaaeap o4ddociated, Vitc. ( !`' t= tiFs o \8lr ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-PLANNERS 105 Webster Street, Units 1 &2 Hanover, MA 02339 7 �i°FEB 22 l (781)878-0066 FAX(781)878-7060 E-mail: david@dhdunlap.com February 20, 2008 Mr. Thomas Perry, Director Building Division Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Re: Cape Regency Assisted Living Dear Mr. Perry: Our office has compiled field reports from job meetings being held on a continuing basis at Cape Regency under Permit#B 20073078. This information is being provided to you for your records as required under controlled construction, Section 116.2.1 of the MSB, 780 CMR 6t" Edition. Reports attached hereto are as follows: 11/29/07 12/20/07 1/3/08 1/17/08 1/31/08 2/14/08 Sincerely yours, DAVID H. DUNLAP ASSOCIATES, I C. Ole David H. ap, r., NCARB, A President j November 29, 2007 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Tom Lavallee, Radius Mgmt. Danielle Breault, Executive Director Cape Regency Michael Berendsen, Director of Maintenance Jim Goulet, Nauset Al Deluca, Nauset Kevin Scrima, Nauset David Dunlap, DHDA Purpose: Discuss the hold-up on the building permit and get a construction start date. Construction Administration 1. Permit: J. Goulet stated that the town is looking for affidavits from the engineers on the project. Once they receive the permit will be issued. 2. Construction Signs: to be ordered and posted. 3. Updated schedule to be issued by the GC now that the subs are onboard and has worked through the site contractor. 4. Shop Drawing submission: A. Sitework: Materials and equipment have been sent directly to the engineers for approval. DHDA requested that a copy of the submissions be sent to him and Jon Truslow. We also need a record of the engineers' approvals and/or comments on the submission. Any materials, equipment, etc. installed without final approval will be at the risk of the contractor. Removal/replacement if required by the engineers will be at the contractor's expense. B. Electrical submissions were provided to DHDA for review. C. Nauset will provide a schedule of submission dates at the next meeting. D. DHDA requested an update on long-lead items. It has been a problem in the past and we want to avoid it on this project. 5. Commencement of sitework: A. Nauset advised that the sitework will commence December 3, 2007. The area to the right of the entrance drive, which has been discussed at previous meetings,will be cleared for use by the contractor and at the end of the job it will be restored to its previous condition. B. Site Utilities: 1. Gas Line: At the meeting held earlier in the day Nauset was advised that the utility will allow the underground piping that is presently in pace to remain as it is found to be as good or better then the PVC they would utilize and that only a 50' - 60' line right at the building will be replaced and increased in size. This is where the existing meter needs to be relocated. Shrubs will need to be removed to install the new gas meter. Revisions are shown on the drawing provided at the meeting. The line has been laid out on the ground. The change to the gas line need to be sent to the HVAC engineer so that they are clear on how the gas is to be delivered inside the building. It is our understanding that work by the gas company will commence the week of 12/3/07. This work is located in the front of the building and will require coordination of the traffic. Temporary access needs to be installed so that there is access to the building 24/7. 2. The water line is also in a similar state in that the existing lines will be utilized to the extent possible to minimize replacement and excavation. This will not only be a more cost-effective way to install the utilities but will also minimize the hassle of cutting the blacktop, trenching, steel plates, etc. The change to the water line inside the building need to be coordinated with the facility. They advised that since the work is taking place in the storage areas, they need to relocate some of their materials so that work can take place. They are wanted to know how long the work would take so that if necessary they can have a contingency plan. 3. DHDA requested a copy of the revised information and the I changes shall be implemented into the as-built drawing. C. Relocating fire hydrants/installing new fire hydrant requires strict coordination with the facility. It needs to be done at the end of the work day. The tie-ins need to be done with either a wet tap or have the excavation and material on-site and ready for installation so that the work will take a minimum about of time to complete. We discussed starting the work after 7 pm when the kitchen is down. The work entails the installation of the fire hydrants and flushing out the domestic water inside the building. D. New Parking Spaces: 1. Requested that Nauset look into installing the new spaces so they can be utilized over the winter. Only the binder course needs to be installed; then in the spring the base can be checked and then the finish coat installed. If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing. Next meeting is scheduled for December 6, 2007 @ 12:30 pm after Radius Plymouth job meeting. David H.Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. k December 20, 2007 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT Weather: 32 degrees, light rain to snow People Present: Jon Truslow, Radius Mgmt. Danielle Breault, Executive Director Cape Regency Michael Berendsen, Director of Maintenance Stan Sczurko,Site Engineer Tom Ryder, Site Engineer Site Contractor Al Deluca, Nauset Jim Goulet, Nauset Kevin Scrima, Nauset Purpose: Review progress of project. Construction Administration 1. Status of Permit: A. J. Goulet stated that the permit was ready to be picked up. This needs to be posted and copies need to be distributed to the facility,J. Truslow and DHDA. B. Super was advised that a copy of all permits from the prime subcontractors shall be distributed to those who received the building permit. 2. Construction Schedule: A. Need the adjusted start of construction date and the realistic completion date. Nauset to provide an update and post it in the trailer. B. Utility start: 12/5/07. Work ongoing. 1. Contractor to get the as-built gas line information to the engineer to place on the as-built drawings. 2. Status of the modification to the water line: j a. Appears engineer has not revised sketch as requested. They indicated that the existing conditions are very light on the drawings making it not legible. Engineer to provide legible document. b. T. Ryder explained how the new water line will be run and where it will be tied into the existing line. The intent is to use as much of the existing line as is possible to reduce the cost of replacing the incoming water service. The reason for relocating it is that it goes through the new leaching field, which does not meet code. C. As of this date, the underground piping and fire hydrants submitted on 11/19/07 have not been reviewed/returned to the GC. T. Ryder stated he would review and return 12/21/07. d. Site contractor indicated that he would start the construction of the water lines once he receives approval. e. We reconfirmed the sequence to be utilized once the water line is tied into so that there is no disruption in the facility and that the sprinkler system will not be down more than 4 hours. Fire department must be kept in the loop. f. Site contractor indicated that he will excavate and install all of the new piping in approx. 2 areas, get the lines ready to put in and then coordinate the facility relative to shutdown to minimize the time to the extent possible. Tying in will not start before 7 pm. g. The interior lines that need to be flushed, maintenance supervisor indicated that the water mixing valve needs to be shut down and re-piped as the debris created,by the shut down will interfere with the mixing valve. He is scheduled to have it re-calibrated at this time so he will coordinate it with the shut down of the water. C. Testing: We reviewed that the owner needs to contract with UTS to do the testing under various trades and the geotech who did the test borings will confirm that the subsoil where the foundations bear are consistent with his bearing analysis utilized to design the structure. All testing shall be distributed to the following: I 1. Nauset @ site 2. Nauset @ office 3. Jon Truslow 4. Dunlap Associates 5. Building Inspector 6. Anderson Engineering, Structural Engineer D. WWT Plant: 1. Civil engineers discussed the plant and the status of some of the changes that are presently underway. Evidently, the manufacturer of the treatment plant is making changes which are being reviewed with the engineer and once they have been formalized, the manufacturer will submit through the GC shop drawings showing the layout and component parts of the treatment plan. SS Design will be responsible to coordinate the shop drawings with the I nvelope of the building where it will be housed. 2. Discussed DHDA's concerns relative to insuring that the final product will fit within the building envelope that was previously designed. Special attention is directed to the roof hatch so that filters can be removed when or if necessary, foundation, inverts, etc. 3. Since the contractor is gearing up to do the foundations, it is essential that the shop drawings are reviewed/approved and issues to the those on the construction team. GC to coordinate with various other trades who tie into the treatment plant: plumbing, electrical, HVAC, etc. 3. Shop drawings: A. Sitework: 1. Underground structure, catch basins, tanks, etc. shall be submitted to the site engineer by 12/28/07. 2. Leaching Field: Site contractor indicated that piping and information needed for the leaching field has been submitted. This office looked at the submission and it did not appear to be in shop drawing form. Piping may be in the submittal, but distribution box, vents, etc. needed for a complete system need to be submitted. B. Building: 1. mechanical 2. plumbing C. Masonry products were submitted for review and approval. D. Structural steel framing has been returned as revised/submitted. Drawings need to comply with requirements shown on addendum#5. 4. ASI: A. #1: Modifications made to structural drawings: GC indicated that they have passed it along to their subs and will respond at the next meeting. 5. Job Super's Look Ahead was provided at the meeting. 6. Observation of Site: A. Even though it has been wet the last several days,work has been ongoing and temporary parking is in place. GC was advised that he needs to keep it dry. B. Site clearing: 90% of the area where the new service entrance drive is to be relocated to has been cleared. Top soil has been stockpiled. Additional fill is needed before work progresses. Compaction tests will be taken in the area of the road where it is filled. C. Work has been laid out relative to modification to the island at the main entrance and temporary relocation of the access drive. Based on weather conditions, it will continue to be installed. D. Grades were being shot in the area of the leaching area at the time of the site view. 7. Existing conditions relative to the building: A. M. Berendsen advised that a pressure-reducing valve needs to be placed on the incoming water service due to the fact that the water pressure is normally at 70 psi, but at times it spikes to 83 psi and that he is seeing some wear and tear in the laundry equipment due to the increased pressure. DHDA advised that when the pressure exceeds 85 psi residual, this is the time when a pressure reducing valve is placed on the system. It appears that there would have to be one on the fire and domestic. We will get the engineer's recommendation on this. It was not clear as to when or how often it spikes. B. I met with the job super to discuss an existing condition which shows a masonry opening in the basement to be 64" instead of the large opening shown. Since the access corridor is 6' wide,we will line the corridor up with this opening and run it straight through the existing basement as shown. Super will review this in the field and we will discuss at the next meeting to see if it causes additional issues. C. We discussed the area where the new sewage line comes into the existing building and drops down. It requires the existing floor to be cut and tied into. The drawings we looked at did not appear to show this line. We asked the super to check to see that he has the latest drawings on site. D. We pointed out that ASI #1 showed modifications to the building as well and need to be placed on site. PM was not at the meeting and perhaps they are in transit. Next job meeting to be announced. If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing within ten days receipt; otherwise, this report shall stand as written. David H. Dunlap,Jr., NCARB, ARA President t` January 3, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow, Radius Mgmt. Danielle Breault, Executive Director Cape Regency Michael Berendsen, Director of Maintenance Ian Manferdini, Nauset Jon Teixeira, Nauset Al Deluca, Nauset Kevin Scrima, Nauset Stan Sczurko, Site Engineer (later in mtg.) David Dunlap,DHDA Purpose: Review progress of project Weather: 18 degrees, snowed approximately 2" in the AM. Roads open, site accessible. Construction Administration 1. Permits: A. Building Permit: Received and posted. DHDA sent copy to DPH to indicate that the project has commenced. B. Kevin Scrima provided me the welding permit for our records. DHDA reminded that we would like a copy of permits for the prime contractors on the project. C. Certificate of Insurance: Nauset provided previously. 2. Construction Schedule: A Nauset is updating and will provide the week of January 14r''. B. Utility work is presently on hold: 1. Waiting for a revised drawing from the site engineer on the water line depicting the existing and new water lines and how they tie together. It was agreed that DHDA will provide revision to the walks and a patio on the SP drawing and the CAD file will be sent to Tom Ryder who will incorporate this along with the requested changes between the new and existing water line. The revision date to be used on all drawings will be 1/9/08. 2. Job super indicated that he is going to see if the site contractor can due a wet tap which would be less disruptive to the facility. This is to be confirmed. 3. Stan indicated that the fire hydrant and the water piping has been approved; however, it was called for in an email from Tom Ryder. We explained to the engineers that the shop drawing process is from the GC to the site engineer and one copy to DHDA. The site engineer will review the shop drawing, stamp it and indicate whether they are rejected, approved as noted, approved, etc. During our conversation, evidently, modifications were made to the piping relative to sizes. Copies of the shop drawings need to be circulated to those in attendance. This is done to insure there are no problems during the installation of the materials. C. Contractor indicated that he sent some site material to UTS for evaluation. D. WWT Plant: 1. There have been no submissions on shop drawings. Site engineer indicated that the approved drawings by DEP and the state are what the plant should be constructed from. 2. We pointed out that before fabrication of the plant,we need the shop drawings for the treatment plant to be reviewed by the site engineer and the contractor to avoid any problems during construction. The engineer indicated that there is only one modification which is the UV light, which is forthcoming. 3. Shop Drawings: A. Sitework-underground structures: G C indicated that this will be submitted the week of January 14th B. Building: 1. Mechanical engineer has returned the submittal on the RTU. These were provided to the contractor. 2. Plumbing: forthcoming in January. C. Shop drawings being reviewed: 1. masonry products by DHDA 2. structural steel framing by engineer 4. GC has questions on the steel erection. He was directed to contact the structural engineer directly and to report back at the next job meeting. 5. ASI: A. #1: The structural drawings included under this ASI had not gotten to the field. DHDA provided a set to the field. Ian indicated that he sent out the shop drawings with this revision date to the subcontractors involved. 6. Job Super's Look Ahead: Nauset provided their look ahead to those in attendance. 7. Pressure reducer was discussed with the site engineer. If required to be located outside the building it will be by the site engineer and if it is inside, it will be designed by the building engineer. Hall Engineer is presently reviewing. 8. Site engineer indicated that the gas line, as installed, appears to come close to the new proposed foundation. Safeguards will have to be put in place when the foundation is installed. Job super indicated that the gas company relocated the gas company in the trench during their installation of the line. 9. Site Modifications: A. The relocated parking spaces were redefined by the site engineer due to trying to save existing trees and the number of parking spaces was split. See revised drawing for additional information. B. We discussed the drainage. An additional catch basin was shown on the set of 3 parking spaces. This was questioned because we are talking about a small area of additional impervious material being placed on the site but there was an existing catch basin in the existing drive in close proximity to this. It appears that the rest of the parking spaces on the access loop did not require an additional catch basin. We asked the engineer to re- evaluate this to eliminate undue costs to the project. C. Site engineer was instructed to bring these drawings up to a finished state so that they can be presented to the attorney who will determine how these documents get re-submitted to the town for approval. The V' s engineering will be held off on the storm water unless it is an easy adjustment to the calculations. Once the path of approval is determined then additional engineering aspects will be completed. Next meeting is scheduled for January 17, 2008. If anyone has additions and/or corrections, please notify this office in writing. David H. Dunlap,Jr. David H. Dunlap Associates, Inc. January 17, 2008 FILE ONLY CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow, Radius Mgmt. Danielle Breault, Executive Director Cape Regency Michael Berendsen, Director of Maintenance Stan Sczurko, Site Engineer Jon Teixeira, Nauset Al Deluca, Nauset Jim Goulet, Nauset Kevin Scrima, Nauset David Dunlap, DHDA Purpose: Review progress of project. Construction Administration 1. Permits: No permits provided. Copies of MEP will be provided to architect. 2. Construction Schedule: A. PM indicated that the project is on schedule. Nauset provided an updated schedule, revised contact list and submission log. B. Sitework: 1. Stan reported that he is working with the quasi water authority and fire department to revise the drawing to show the incoming water service. This revised drawing shows extensive work that is different from the construction documents and what was discussed at the last meeting. Evidently the design drawings were not coordinated with the Centerville/Osterville/Marston Mills water dept. as extensive changes are required. 2. GC indicated that he must start this work or it will be disruptive to the completion schedule. Work shall not commence until approvals are received from the above departments requiring the changes. 3. Discussed that an 8" water line only needs to be replaced as shown on the drawings. There is an easement that runs to the street where a the 10" line is remaining and according to Stan does not require replacement. This begs the question: Why does the other 10" line need to be replaced with an 8"line? Requirements by the water department were cited. 4. Changes requested for the walks, previously discussed at the last meeting and changed any number of times,were approved as shown on SS Designs drawing. This means that the calculations can be redone and the final submission to the conservation commission completed. It was pointed out that during the layout of the sewage treatment plant, it appears that the clearance of the access road at 16' as shown on the drawings may not be possible due to the present location of the detention pond. We recommend that the site engineer resolve this issue before going to the conservation commission, but if this changes, then the calculations will have to be redone yet again (Nauset is looking into this). 5. Stan indicated that the bench marks shown on the drawings are acurate and should be utilized to layout the grades on this project. Nauset asked for control on the plans so that the new addition, sewage treatment and other elements of the proposed project can be dimensionally located off of. Jim Goulet went into the requirements needed in order to insure the owner is in fact laid out in the field in the same manner as shown on the construction documents. Engineers are to provide this information so that the layout can be confirmed. 6. Michael Berendsen indicated that we spoke about placing access raceways for a sprinkler system to be installed at a later date. This was discussed and Stan stated he would review the requirements to see if the processed water from the treatment plant can be used to water the grass and other landscaped areas. He is to report back at the next meeting. 7. Stan explained the drawing and his understanding of the fire and water department's concerns which are now reflected in the new plan that he will get approved and signed off by each. 8. The site drawing is supposed to be revised to show the extent of the curbs on the site so it is clear how these are to be constructed and the location. It is our understanding that a controlled run-off is to be created using a combination of existing catch basins and new detention area. 3. Shop Drawings: A. Status: 1. WWTP: This system is a critical piece to the completion of the project as approvals require that if it is not in operation, then the finished building cannot be occupied. This means that shop drawings from the plant manufacturer need to be submitted so that they can be coordinated with the various trades. This information was requested early on and still has not been provided. Nauset reported that they have advised the sitework contractor that they need this information including a breakdown on the cost of the project, confirmation that the contractor will meet the requirements and that the treatment plant will fit in the structure designed for it. If this information is not forthcoming, DHDA advised holding up on the work for the sewage treatment plant including the layout of the treatment building which appears to not allow clearance for the access road. 2. Underground Structures: awaiting approval. 3. Stan brought submissions that were reportedly approved by Tom Ryder, but the submissions did reflect that they were approved. Standard procedure pointed out is that a shop drawing stamp should be afixed to the submission and the action taken should be marked, and if there are modifications, suggestions, requirements, etc. they should be noted thereon to be made apart of the record. Stan was requested to provide this information before the next job meeting. (a stamp does not mean the engineer's stamp, it indicates a shop drawing stamp that is traditionally used on construction. B. Returned: 1. Foundation Rebar: Needs to meet VE; revise/resubmit. 2. Structural Steel: Need to meet VE, revise/resubmit. 3. Bar joists returned, copy for record. i 4. masonry products C. Being reviewed: 1. columns and beams -forwarded to engineers for review 2. structural steel-forwarded to engineers for review. 3. revised base plates (still don't meet value engineering) 4. Millwork-by DHDA 5. Doors/Frames-by DHDA 4. ASI: 1. #2: Hardware Sets, Rev. January 16, 2008 -GC received 2. #3: Structural Revisions,January 9, 2008 -GC received 5. Job Super's Look Ahead: See attached. 6. Requisition #3: GC to provided breakdown as requested. 7. Status of renovation inside building: 1. Utilities - gone as far as they can presently go in basement 2. Corridor-work underway in basement corridor. 3. Door to existing mechanical room will remain in place. 8. Building's Pressure Reducer Valve: sent to engineer. Construction Phase 1. It was requested by the maintenance supervisor that DHDA provide 8.5 x 11 site plan showing the parking area to resolve parking issues. This plan will be utilized to indicate what parking spaces will be available and which ones won't during the construction phase. 2. DHDA and job super walked through the basement and responded to minor questions raised. An outstanding issue is the sidelight beside the door into the new dietician's office. 3. Basement plan on site does not appear to be the latest. Earlier a meeting was had by Tony Papantonis,Jon Truslow,Jon Teixeira and David Dunlap. Tony had visited the job earlier in the morning and had concerns about the project. He felt that in order to expedite the construction a number of things needed to happen: 1. The water line needs to be installed sooner than later. It is our understanding that Stan was going to deliver the drawing noted above,which it was,but we found out it still needs to be approved. 2. Tony questioned whether the dining area that is to be renovated including new carpet should be done at this point considering that a lot of work needs to be done directly over top of the this dining room which may cause leaks that could destroy the finishes. We discussed and Jon is to discuss with the operations. However, he knew that the doors need to be replaced. Jon Teixeira said this is not a problem as they have been ordered. 3. Discussed issues relative to the site and how they will be confirmed. January 31, 2008 CAPE REGENCY ASSISTED LIVING ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Chris Bassett, Radius Mgmt. Tom Lavalle, Radius Mgmt. Jon Truslow, Radius Mgmt. Danielle Breault, Executive Director Cape Regency Michael Berendsen, Director of Maintenance Stan Sczurko,Site Engineer Tom Ryder,Site Engineer Jon Teixeira, Nauset Al Deluca, Nauset Jim Goulet, Nauset Kevin Scrima, Nauset David Dunlap, DHDA ose:Purpose: Review progress of construction. Chris Bassett explained that she is extremely disappointed on the progress made on this project to date and will not tolerate this continual delay on the part of the construction team. She thought that the excavation for the foundation would have taken place by now and the foundation partially in. She wants this to be corrected immediately if not sooner. She also stated that she needs the dining room in the nursing home completed now. This means the doors, which are presently not on site, need to be installed. She wants carpet installed and other finish items completed. This dining area is a key ingredient in marketing the facility as.well as providing adequate dietary care to the resident. Construction Administration 1. Construction Schedule: A. Sitework: 1. New underground water line has been installed from the easement to the facility and they are waiting for the 2nd new 6" line to be brought across the parking lot for the fire hydrant. The incoming water for the fire service has been approved by the water department and the fire department. f , <I 2. Confirmation of site layout and control: A. SS Design stated that they would provide a print and CAD file showing the design and layout of the new facility. This will be provided by February 4, 2008. B. SS Design indicated that there is room to get the 16' driveway around the back of the facility contrary to what Nauset reported. C. Location of proposed addition: Nauset to confirm with their layout people. D. Direction and location of the access drive is set. Work is underway: Rough grading, detention pond, pit for 15,000 ga. tank has been dug and stone base installed. Bench marks are noted and utilized for control. E. Several leaching pits have been destroyed by the sitework equipment. This will have to be corrected and if the area needs to be pumped during the construction phase until the new system is installed then this will be the responsibility of the sitework contractor. F. Job super wants to do a test and have the geotech observe the bearing soil for the foundation to confirm that it does meet the requirements for the structural loading of the new addition. Nauset to contact the geotech prior to digging the hole. We do not want bearing soils exposed for an extended period of time in this cold weather. The goal is to dig it out and protect it over night; then form it and pour it the next day. Protect the footing and the continue with the other footings. 3. Shop Drawings: A. Status: 1. WWTP: Tom Ryder has reviewed and approved. DHDA provided concerns that the electrical engineer had on various voltages being included in the plan. 2. Elevator: Provide ASAP. It is our understanding that the elevator f �l has not been bought. This needs to be done ASAP. 3. Re-submission of Foundation: Reinforcing steel needs to be made. We were told that a re-submission was made. I checked and found that we had not received a new submission, but we did receive R-2, but we need both drawings in order to complete the review. 4. Metal Deck: The drawings have not been submitted yet. B. Returned to GC: 1. Millwork 2. Structural Steel,with comments C. A submittal log was provided. 4. ASIs: A. #4 re: water stop was provided to the job super today. 5. Previous Look Ahead: A. Install water line: completed on time B. Frame basement partitions : completed on time C. Rough electric, basement: completed on time D. Basement drywall, one side: completed on time E. Install 15,00 ga. tank by 2/2/08. 6. Job Super's Look Ahead: Job super provided to those in attendance. 7. Requisition: #3 was reviewed and found it could be approved as amended. The drywall item and gazebo allowance needs to be revised. A PCO for a credit needs to be processed. 8. Site Modifications Drawings: Status of the (7) additional parking spaces. Tom Ryder has revised his drawing and showed it to us. Minor modifications need to be made and then it can be submitted for approval. J. Truslow to handle. 9. Next meeting is 2/14/08. Walk-Thru A number of items were being constructed: a 1. Installation of tank. 2. Modification to leaching pits that were broken. 3. Top soil was being stockpiled. 4. Fences were installed. 5. Parking appeared OK. 6. DHDA provided a sketch of the site to the M. Berendsen so he can alert his employees on what spaces will be available and when. 7. We viewed the new access corridor that was constructed through the basement. One side is sheet rocked. We explained that the closets located off of this corridor shall be 1-hr. fire-rated, not 2-hr. previously talked about. Existing door to remain. We were advised that the rough inspection of electrical is to take place shortly. We also explained that we are concerned about piping and conduits going through the electrical closet. This will be reviewed with the electrical engineers to see if there are any issues. I February 14, 2007 CAPE REGENCY ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT People Present: Jon Truslow, Radius Stan, SS Design Jim Goulet, Nauset Jon Teixeira, Nauset Al Deluca, Nauset Kevin Scrima, Nauset David Dunlap, DHDA Purpose: Review progress of construction. Construction Administration 1. Construction Schedule: A. Sitework: 1. GC reported that they are working on sanitizing the new water line to the facility. First failed; they tried again; it was verbally approved, but report is on the way. 2. 6" fire line still needs to be installed that picks up the relocated fire hydrants requested by the fire department. Work to be done this week. The tie in was discussed with the owner and will be scheduled based on the completion of the line. 3. Confirmation of site layout and control: Job super indicated that the layout has been confirmed and is accurate. 4. J. Goulet requested a baseline control from the site engineer. 5. The 15,000 ga. tank for the septic system has been installed and backfilled. 6. Test pit was constructed and material taken out for testing. DHDA explained that the geotech needs to visually observe the condition and consistency of the bearing surface so the geotech can confirm his assumption of the soil. GC to schedule. 7. Stan brought us up to date on his discussions with: 1. Conservation commission and the consultant who is going to present the revised parking layout. 2. EPA relative to using the sewage treatment water to water the lawn with a direct burial system which water the roots directly. They instructed to pursue the necessary approvals. 2. Interior Renovations -Status: A. Doors have been installed but they still require painting and stain including the openings they are installed. B. Nourishment station has not been relocated. There was a question on the final location. C. HM windows and glazing have.been installed in the dining room from the common corridor. D. Nauset was instructed to proceed with finishing the dining room in its entirety,i.e.: floors, walls and ceiling. Drawing was develop by Wellesley showing the layout. 3. Shop Drawings: A. Status: 1. WWT Plant: It has not been confirmed whether the GC has received the approved drawings. 2. Elevator-purchase: GC is having a problem with getting a generic " elevator since Radius has had trouble with various elevator companies relative to service and operation of their equipment. It is imperative that this is purchased as the elevator pit and shaft cannot be constructed until we get the shop drawings with the car size and.required clearances, elevator pit, etc. 3." GO indicated that the metal deck shop drawings were previously approved:. B. Returned to GC at meeting: 1. Steel Beams 2. Concrete Mix 3. ASI: A. #5: Requests cost savings relative to going from solid core doors in apartments to hollow core. GC is working on this. 4. Job Super provided the look ahead to those in attendance. 5. Requisition#3 has been sent to the owner with recommendation to process. Construction Coordination 1. There have been no.reports of the construction interfering with the operations. 2. Parking Issues: This is an evolving situation while sitework is underway. Owner, and GC are working together to address any issues. 3. J. Truslow wants to interviews with the calls to be utilized in this building. It should be noted that this information was submitted some time ago and no progress has been made. Waiting on owner's determination. Next meeting is 2/28/08.