Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0104 OLD KINGS ROAD oq CIIIF'J"l6LI The Town of Barnstable EIAMSTAMM 9� MAqq 039. �e� Department of Health, Safety and Environmental Services iOrFn '�" Building Division 367 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Ralph Crossen Fax: 508-790-6230 Building Commissioner May 12, 1999 Richard P. Largay Rougeau, Butler& Largay 720 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Re: 104 Old King's Road, Cotuit 022 095 Dear Rick: A review of your April 22, 1999 letter concerning 104 Old King's Road in Cotuit and the recent Land Court case (Vecchione v. Balboni) has resulted in our now agreeing with you. You may tell Judge Harvey he has a buildable lot from a zoning perspective. I am sorry for any inconvenience. Sincerely, Ralph M. Crossen Building Commissioner RMC/lbn g990512d r i LAW OFFICES ROUGEAU, BUTLER & LARGAY A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 720 MAIN STREET HYANNIS, MASSACHUSETTS 02601 (508) 771-4230 RICHARD N. ROUGEAU FACSIMILE WILLIAM F. BUTLER, 111 (508) 778-6866 RICHARD P. LARGAY April 22, 1999 A Ralph M. Crossen Building Commissioner Town of Barnstable-Building Division Barnstable Town Offices 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Re: 104 Old King's Road, Cotuit, Massachusetts Barnstable Assessors Map 22 Parcel 95 Also shown as Lot 99 on Plan Book 271 Page 58 i/n/o John V. Harvey Dear Mr. Crossen: This office represents John V. Harvey of Cotuit, Massachusetts. I am writing to you in response to your letter of March 30, 1999 to Judge Harvey in which you state that Lot 99 Old King's Road is not buildable because Lot 99 was not held "... in separate ownership continually since it was last in compliance with zoning (prior to March of 1973)." A recent decision from the Massachusetts Land Court holds that adjoining residential lots, held in separate•ownership at the time a zoning change made them nonconforming,even when the lots were later joined in common ownership for a period of time and later separated, are in fact grandfathered under the provision of M.G.L. c. 40A § 6. The case holds that there is no requirement that the adjoining lots be held in separate ownership continually since they were last in compliance with zoning. The critical issue is whether the adjoining lots were separately owned at the time of the zoning change. See Vecchione v. Balboni Mass. Land Court Case No. 244818, decided March 5, 1999. (Copy of decision enclosed.) in the Vecchione case, two adjoining lots (Lots 22 and 231.'etrop 11R gad) in Natick were created by a subdivision plan in 1950. In 1953 and 1954 the Natick Zoning By-Law was amended rendering Lots 22 and 23 nonconforming as to lot size and frontage. At the time of the zoning amendments, Lots 22 and 23 were held in separate ownership. From 1959 to 1963 the two lots were held in common ownership and in 1963 Lot 23 was sold to Mr. and Mrs. Balboni. In 1997,the Balboni's applied for a building permit and the Natick building inspector denied the permit. That decision was appealed to the Natick Zoning Board of Appeals. The Zoning Board of Appeals ruled that Lot 23 was grandfathered because it was held in separate ownership at the time it was rendered nonconforming by the zoning amendments,even though it was later held in common ownership with Lot 22. An appeal was taken to the Massachusetts Land Court and the Court ruled that under both the Natick Zoning By-Laws and M.G.L. c. 40A § 6, because the lots were held in separate ownership at the time of the zoning amendment,the subject lots are grandfathered,despite the fact they were subsequently held in common ownership for a period of time. Ralph M. Crossen Building Commissioner Page Two April 22, 1999 The facts regarding Judge Harvey's lot are remarkably on point with the facts in the recent Vecchione decision. The relevant facts are as follows: • There are two lots in question; Lot 17 Furlong Way and Lot 99 Old King's Road, Cotuit. • The two lots were created by different subdivision plans in 1973. Lot 99 is part of a 112 lot subdivision known as King's Grant and Lot 17 is part of a separate 34 lot subdivision known as "Hillcrest". • Lot 17 and Lot 99 are "adjoining" at their rear lot lines for a distance of approximately 50 feet. They have frontage on different streets. • Both lots conformed to existing zoning when they were legally created. • In March, 1973 the Barnstable Zoning By-Law was amended increasing the minimum lot size and frontage within the zoning district,rendering both lots nonconforming. • At the time of the zoning change the lots were held in separate ownership. • From June 8, 1979 to December 26, 1979, the two lots were held in common ownership by John V.Harvey. Lot 17 was subsequently sold and a house has been built on it. • The owners of Lot 17 received a building permit without a variance. • Judge Harvey continues to own Lot 99 and now seeks a determination that it is grandfathered under the provisions of the Barnstable Zoning Ordinances and M.G.L. c. 40A § 6. Section 4-4.2 of the Barnstable Zoning Ordinance provides, in summary, that a zoning amendment for bulk regulations will not apply to a residential lot for single or two- family use if the lot meets certain minimum size requirements(5,000 square feet of area and 50 feet of frontage) which Lot 99 meets; if the lot conformed with zoning when it was legally created(it did); and it was held in separate ownership from adjoining land at the time of all zoning changes which made the lot nonconforming (it was). Please note,there is no provision that such separate ownership be maintained continually from the date the lot was last in compliance with zoning. The Barnstable ordinance, although different in its wording, is not materially different in its substantive provisions from the Natick By-Law and M.G.L. c. 40A § 6. The Land Court, citing Carcigfi v. Bd. of Appeals of Billerica, 22 Mass. App. Ct. 926 (1986) and LeBlanc v. Bd. of Appeals of Danvers, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 760, 761 n. 3 (1992)held that two lots held separately at the time of a by-law amendment but later held in common were to be treated as grandfathered under M.G.L. c. 40A § 6. There is no material difference between the matter before you and the Natick case which looks to ownership solely at the time of the zoning amendment and not thereafter. Ralph M. Crossen Building Commissioner Page Three April 22, 1999 As a separate issue in this case,I believe that just because Lot 17 and Lot 99 share a common rear boundary line of approximately 50 feet does not necessarily make the lots "adjoining" for purposes of M.G.L. c. 40A § 6 or the Barnstable Zoning Ordinance § 4- 4.2. In Sturges v. Town of Chilmark: 402 N.E. 2d 1346 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that the meaning of the word"adjoining"must be arrived at on a case by case basis by consideration of the legislative purpose of § 6, which is to protect a once valid lot from being rendered unbuildable if it meets certain minimum dimensional requirements. Lot 17 and Lot 99 are in different subdivisions and subject to different private restrictions, and considering them "adjoining" in this case does not increase frontage (the lots front on different streets) and does not change spacing from other dwellings because Lot 17 already has been built on. M.G.L. c. 40A § 6 was not intended to restrict residential use of a lot simply because it touches another, there must be a legitimate purpose for such a determination. None exists here. For the reasons stated above, I respectfully request that you make a determination that Lot 99 Old King's Road is grandfathered and buildable. If you disagree with my position, I respectfully request the opportunity to meet with you and,if necessary, the town attorney. Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, r hard P.Largay RPL:lr Enclosures cc: John V. Harvey, Esq. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Land Court Department of the Trial Court Miscellaneous Case No. 244818 ANTHONY J. VECCHIONE & another,' PlIaLntiff,; . FREDERICK P. BAI BONI & others,' Defendants DECISION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SOPIM-ARY JUDGMENT This casepresents the question whether adjo ining residential lots,held in separate ownership at the time a zoning change made them nonconforming,later j oined in common ownership for a time and still later separated, continue to enjoy the grandfather protection of G. L, c. 40A, § 6, TI 4. Defendants Frederick Balboni (Balboni)and the members of the zoning board of appeals of Natick (hoard)contend the lots are grandfathered,and plaintiffs contend they are not. The board expressed its view in a decision dated October 8, 1997, and plaintiffs brought Uzi appeal under G. L. c. 40A, § 17. The parties agree on all material facts, and filed cross-motions for slim nary judgment and memoranda in support of their respective positions_ i heard zrz=ent on the cross-motions on 'Doris E. Vecchione Stephen E.Perry, Ronald E. Lustig,,Robert E.Havener,Dcborah L. Nelson, Francis J, Feeney,James Fletcher,Robert Troccolo and Julian J.14runn,ich, as they are members and associate members of the board of appeals of the town of Natick l o ' October 2, 1998, Counsel appeared on behalf of plaintiffs and Balboni; counsel for the board did not appear.' The record for purposes of summary.judgment consists of(i) certain allegations in the complaint admitted in Balboni's answer, (ii) an authenticating affidavit of attorney A. Arnold Lundwall, with its attachments, and (iii) a stipulation of facts submitted by the l awes a_fter the hearingat m request.' I have additional) accepted into the record the exhibits attached to the Y q Y � parties' respective memoranda, the authenticity of which the parties do not dispute. The following facts are agreed by the parties. 1. A plan entitled "Wellesley-at-Natick in Natick, Mass., belonging to United Reis Homes, Inc., dated March 29, 1950, Rowland H. Barnes & Co., Civil Engineers, Newtonville, Mass." and recorded with the Middlesex south district registry of deeds' at the end of boot:7599, 'During my deliberations and research in this case following the hearing, I became aware of a case,not cited by either party, involving a question similarr to the question presented here. The other case,Preston K. Bd. of Appeals of Huila was decided in the Plymouth superior court on Febriary 13, 1998 (DelVecchio, J.),was appealed and is currently pending before the Appeals Court, as docket no. 98-P-1266. In addition to briefs submitted by the parties in that case, a brief has been filed by lie Abstract Club and the Massachusetts Conveyancers Association, as arnici curiae with leave of the Court. I convened a status conference, in which I advised the parties of the pending appeal in Preston, and of my intent to review the briefs in that case before deciding this one. I also invited the parties to submit supplemental briefs to respond to the arguments made in the Preston case. Neither party chose to file a supplemental brief. 'Though both parties adopted substantially similar versions of tlac facts in Qlgcir respective memoranda and oral arguments,various core facts were not established in the materials submitted by the parties prior to the hearing. I asked the parties to submit a stipulation of those additional facts which they wished me to consider in the word for purposes of sununatiy judgment, and they filed their stipulation on October 14, 1998, 5A11 references to recorded documents are to such registry. 2 . I created, among other lots, two abutting lots shown as lots 22 and 23 on such plan. Lot 23 on such plan is also known as 6 Rctrop Road, and lot 22 on such plan is also known as 8 Retrop Road. 8 Retrop Road (locus) is the subject of this action. Locus is unimproved. The record does not establish whether or when a structure may have been built on 6 Retrop Road. 2. In 1950, when 6 Retrop Road and locus were created, they were located in a single family zoning district S-A, under the then applicable.Natick zoning by-law(by-Iaw). At that time, the by-law required a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet an,d minima m frontage of 70 feet. 6 Retrop Road contains 11,549 square feet and has 84 feet of frontage on Retrop Road. Locus contains 12,343 square feet and has 90.31 feet of frontage on Retrop Road. A.ccordirtgly,both lots conformed to the then applicable lot size and frontage requirements. 3. In 1953 the by-law was amended to increase the applicable minimum um lot size in residence district S-A to 15,000 square feet, and the minimum frontage to 100 feet. Accordingly, tlic 1953 amendments rendered both 6 Retrop Road and locus nonconforming. 4. At the time of the I953 zoning amendment, 6 Retrop Road and locus were held in separate ownership. S. In 1954, the by-law was again amended, this tuiie to change the zoning district in which 6 Retrop Road and locus were located. Asa result of the 1954 amendment, the properties . were rezoned to residence district S-C, in which the minimum lot size was 20,000 square feet, and the minimum frontage was120 feet. The lot size and frontage requirements remained at those minimums when this action commenced. 3 b• At the time of the 1954 zoni separate ownership. ng amendment, 6 Retrop Road and locus were held in 7• By deed dated December 12, 1956, and recorded in book 8871,page 568, Harold F. Jennison, Jr. and Pearl K. Jennison,husband and wife,acquired Q title to 6 Retrop Road as tenants by -, •.•,. ,,'✓ •••:vM uated Mal'clh 4, 1959, and recorded in book 9376, a 5 • Jennison. Jr. and Pearl K. Jeiuiison, husband and wife. page 69. Darold P. acquired title to locus as tenants entirety. Mr. and Mrs.Jennison thereafter held title to both 6 Rctrop Road by the and Locus until October 13, 1963. 8• In April 1960,the by-Jaw was amended, to establish a tnaxianurri building covep$ge of 201 on a lot in the residence district S.C. The mQ,irnum lot coverage remained at 20% at the time this action commenced. The record reflects no other = endments to the by_I$w dung the Period Locus and 6 Retrop Road were he ld in cnmrnon ownership J 9• By deed dated October 13, 1963, axzd recorded in book 10381,page 159, Harold F. ennison, Jr. and pearl K Jennison conveyed title to locus to rederick 13alboni and Marjorie A, Balboni,husband and wife,as tenants by the entirety. �rora that date to the present,6 Retrop Road and Iocus have been held in separate ownership, 10, By letter to Mr. James Fletcher,the board's chairman Natick bu,ildit�,g�spect >dated February 10, 1997, the or stated his opinion that locus is;buildable Jot,and re Your board as to whether NIr.Balboni needs to file a etita quested a reply from P on for a variance.,, 1 I. On or about June 5, 1997,Balboni applied for a buildi ng Permit to construct a home 4 on 8 Retrop Road. In a letter dated June 5, 1997,the Natick:building inspector(despite the opinion stated in his February 10 letter to Mr_ Fletcher) denied Balboni's application for the stated reason that the property"is insufficient in area and frontage"to meet the requirements of the Natick zoning by-law. 12. On or about;uly :997,Ra.`.;;:: �'.td'n'.t"-thc,board a petition for a variance for locus. The board held a hearing on Balboni's application on August 19, 1997 and, on October 8, 1997, issued a decision which denied "without prejudice" Balboni's application for a variance. In the board's decision, the board noted the building inspector's February 10 request for a determination of whether locus requires a variance. Trie board further noted Ym Balboni's attorney's request, made at the hearing, for a detennination that a variance is unnecessary. 13. At the August 18, 1997,hearing,the board stated its intention to seek the opinion of Natick town counsel on the question whether locus is entitled to grandfather protection under O,L. c.40A, § 6. The board further invited plaintiffs to submit a brief on that question,for consideration at the board's hearing on September 22, 1997. In a letter to Natick town counsel dated September 17, 1997,with a copy to(among others) the board,plaintiffs' counsel expressed his argument that locus is not grandfathered. In a letter to the board dated S eptermer 22, 1997,Natick town counsel expressed his opinion that locus is grandfathered. 14. In a decision dated December 22, 1997, and filed with the Natick town clerk on January 8, 1998,the board stated its determination that locus is grandfathered, by virtue of having been held in separate ownership at the time it was rcridered nonconforming by amendments to the 5 Natick zoning by-law. Plaintiff's timely appeal to this court followed. 15. Section IV A.2 of the by-law,which was in effect on all dates relevant to this matter, provides: "Any lot lawfully laid out by plan or deed duly recorded or registered in the appropriate Registry of Deeds or Land Registry District that complies,at the time of such recording or registering, with any rrininium a<ea _"_;: sge,�;;;�e;,1zn;,of any zoning by-law in effect may th.ercap:cr be built upon for a siuglc dud/or two family residential use notwithstanding the adoption or am endment of a zoning by-law imposing minimum area and frontage requirements in excess of the minimum area or frontage,or both,of such lot,provided that at the time of building such lot has an area of more than five thousand square feet, a frontage of fifty feet or more, and is in a district zoned for single and/or two family residential use and conforms except as to area and frontage with the zoning by-law in cl'fect, acid that at the tinge of adoption of such requirements or increased requirements, such lot was lield in ownership separate from that of adjoining land." 16. Section VI-E of the by-law,which was in effect or..all dates relevant to this matter, provides: "Any owner or lessee of real estate affected by the issue of a permit may likewise appeal within 30 days of the publication of the notice thereof. The Inspector may appeal to the Board for a ruling in any case wherein.he is in doubt as to the true intent or application of any part of the Zoning ByLaws. On receipt of notice of appeal,the Town Clerk shall notify the Board of Appeals, who after due notice to the parties concerned, shall give a-hearing and small either affhnn, annul or modify such order, decision, issue refusal, ruling or application or shall determine the true intent and application of any provisions of the Zoning Bylaws." Summary j udgment is appropriate in the instant case because there are no genuine issues of any material facts which would preclude disposition as a:matter orJ. laud. Cornrn 'tv Ne'1 Bank v. Dawes. 369 Mass. 550, 553-556(1976);Mass. R. Civ. F. 56(c). Fuaally,count It of the complaint in this action,and the couesponding prayer for relief,seeks 6 a determination that locus is not a buildable lot under G.L.c.40A, §6,and the parties have engaged fully the substance ofthat questi on in their respective arguments. While the parties have not invoked G.L.c.231 A expressly in the pleadings,in substance the parties have placed a request for such relief before the court. See Carciofi v. Bd. of Appeal of Billerica, 22 Mass. App. Ct_ 926, 927 (1986). Plaintiffs argue that locus and 6 Retrop Road merged into a single lot,and therefore lost their status as separate grandfathered lots under G. L. c. 40A, § 6, when they came into common ownership by the Jennison in 1959. Plaintiffs further argue that,having merged through common ownership, the lots were impermissibly severed in 1963 when the Jennisons conveyed locus to Balboni, As authority, plaintiffs cite a number of cases in which lots held in couUaiou ownership were merged, where the merger of such lots could avoid the creation of a Airriensional nonconf'onnity. See, g.ZVetter Y. Zonina Bd, of Apoeal of Attleboro, .330 Mass. 628 (i953); Gjrard v.Bd. of Appeals of Easton, 14 Mass. App.Ct. 334(1982); Sieber v. Zor ina Bd.of Appeals of Welifleet, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 985 (1983). Alone of the cases plaintiffs cite in support of their position involve the circumstances of this case, in which the lots in question were held in separate ownership at the time of the by-law amendment which made the lots nonconforming,and thcreall.er came into common ownership for a time.' Such were the circumstances in Cardofi v. Bd. of Appeals of Billerica,22 Mass. App, Ct. 926(1986). In that case, the Appeals Court held that it did not matter(for purposes of 6Tbc same is true of Aloha Foundation,Inc. v. Bd. of Appeals of Norwell,4 L.CR 199 (1996)(Lombardi,J.). In Aloha the lots in question were not only held in corpora ownership at the time of the zoning amendment, they were not created until after the amendment was adopted. The central issue in that case was the validity of a"waiver," granted in 1969, which purported to authorize creation of a nevv no-neon fonning lot from a larger parcel. common ownership after they bec=n grandfathering) that two lots came into noncon4orgning, because the text of the grandf ather provision in the applicable by-law looked to whether the lots were n of the amendment. Plaintiffs hi at the time.of the adoptio held in common or separate owners P in the Billerica by-law not present here. 1�owever, argue that arciofi turned on specific languagerovisions of the Billericaa and sve any;new"iingful difference betty een the Corr espondiilg p e lots as want provisions in each case look expressly to the owriersl�ip of th Natick by-laws; the relc P of the date of adoption of the by-law atnendrnent.' e date the local by-law,§6 also looks to the ovrnership of the lots on ttZ Like the provisions of irately at the of the amendment wYuch m ade them noncoilformirig' �-ecordingly,two lots held sep $ andfather provision,one in 1956 and ''The Billerica by-law involved two versions o_the ion Protected a lot,provided`such lot did ble g�u�with such lot.' One in 1965. Thirnl�� Of the e 1956 vets P �ioii ®f adoption of this en ent adjoin other land of the same °Weer avai p erted protection,provided"bt1ch lot did notda�ftlithc same o 7ieT available The 1965 version conf Said lot non-confo�ng adjoin other Ian �,y amendment making Ct. at 927. The Natick by-law Protects a lot, of such requirements or increased Tegi-irements,such lot for use in connection with such lot." Z2 Mass. App- ' providcd"that at the time f adoptionfrom that of adjoining land." was held in ownership sep 1G,L.c. 40A, § 6,14,provides,in its first sentence yard,or depth r�u1ents of a zoning frontage,width;y le and two-farrtily residal ,1�y increase in axe$, l to a lot for sing ordinance or by-law shall not app or endorsement,whichever Occurs sooner was use which at the time of re with any adjoining land, conformed to then not held in common owners P q ro osed requirement but at least five existing re uirements and had less than the p P �' thousand square feet of area and fifty feet of"frontage." a e of he Billerica and Natick by-laws quoted above, That sentence differs from the langu g ding Or III that the literal language of§ 61� looks to the own .ship of the lots"at the time s®f derte g in �,'or to the adoption wearer,it is settled that for purPo endorsement,whichever Occurs a of under §sooner.r 6, ne lootcs to the most recent deed p o the grandfathercd status which rendered the lot noacorifo:ming. Adamo L .c v- of the Toni amendment �12s%ch, 395 Mass. 757 (1985)- g time of a by-I?Lw amendment but later held in common were treated as grandiathered under 6, without reliance on the provisions of the local by-law,in LeBlanc v d of A, Heals of Danvers,32 Mass. App. Ct. 760, 761 n.3 (1992). The legislative history of§ 6 further suggests that the legislature considered, but did not adopt,,angtaage•ril'Li'_= ='aro:zoflots�,�1Ich come into common ownershlp�er they are made nonconforming. Set Mark Bobrowski,Han dbo9k of Massachusetts Land Jse and pk�io Law, § 5.3.1 n.6, and accompanYing text; Donald J. Schmidt, Executive Office of communities and Development,S crate Lot Pro ecti n, . Second ol;,Land Use Manager,Aug. 1986 at 3.9 While the failure to adopt legislation in a particular form is not a conclusive indication of the legislature's intent, it is sufficient to observe that § 6, as adopted, contains no language that er the circumstances of this case;and.no language that derogates from the requires iiierger of lots und statutory construction, in Adamowicz,that looks to the status of ownership solely as of the time of the amendment which renders the lots nonconforming. At the time ofboth the 1953 amendment and the 1954 amendment to the by-law,loafs and 6 Retrop Road were not held in common ownership- Accordingly, they are entitled to the ntained in the first sentence of G.L.c.40A, § 6'`�4,and are Subject to the grandfather protection co lot area and frontage requirements in effect prior to the adoption of the 1953 cndtnent to the by- law. The fact that the two lots were'later held in common,ownership f),a time does not defeat their Zr andfathercd status. Balboni's motion for summary judgment is accordingly allowed, and plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment is denied. 11 acknowledge the discussion of the legislative basto rY contained in the brief of the Abstract Club and the Massachusetts Conveyancers Association,which they.submittod as c na in Prest n v B . of Ap ems oflju�l,, sr. .a note 3. 9 l pursuant to the discussion with the partics at the status coalfererxce described in note 3,suts�a, and with their assent,I am reporting the case to the Appeals Court for determination bf fore entry of judgment. Spe Mass.R. Civ, P. 64(a); G. L. c. 231, § 111. lark V Grecr. Jus�ice Dated: March 5, 1999 10 i I . , COMMONWEAL;rH OF MA SSACHUSETTS Land Court Department of the Trial Court Miscellaneous Case No. 244818 ANTHONY J. VECCI-IIONE& another, Plaintiffs VS. FREDF.RICK P. BALBONI & others,2 Defendants REPORT OF CASE PURSUANT TO MASS. R. CTV. P. 64(a) By decision entered March 5, 1999,I allowed the motion of defendant Frederick P. Balboni for summary judgment,and denied plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment. As stated in that decision, I report the case for determination, pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 64(a). A copy of the decision is attached. This case involves questions of law similar, if not identical,to the questions prescrited by another case currently pending before the Appeals Court,Presto v.13d. of A ea f Hull,no.98- P-1266. At a status conference after the hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment,the parties to this action confirmed that each would appeal a decision adverse to their position, in light of the Appeals Court's pending consideration of the issues in Pre n. I believe a report of the case is appropriate under Rule 64(a)because of the similarity of the issues involved in the two cases,and 'Doris E. Vecchione 2Stepben E.Perry,Ronald E. Lustig,Robert E. Havener,Deborah L.Nelson,Francis J. Feeney, James Fletcher,Robert Troccolo and Julian J.Munnich, as they are members and associate members of the board of appeals of the town of Natick I to facilitate consideration of the two cases in conjunction with each other (if the Appeals Court chooses so to proceed). The parties to this action assent to this report. It is my intent to report all issues fairly raised by the decision, including 1. Whether two lots for residential use, not held in common ownership at the time a zoning amendment renders them nonconforming as to frontage and lot area,later held in common ownership for a time, and still later separated, continue to enjoy grandfather protection under the first sentence of G. L. c. 40A, § 6, `f(4. 2. Whether the grandfather protection of the applicable provision of the Natick zoning by-law continues under the same circumstances,to an extent greater than under § 6 alone. 3. Whether lots held in separate ownership et the time they arc made nonconforming must be merged into a single lot if they are held in common ownership at the time the owner applies for a permit to build a residence on one of the lots. Pursuant to Mass. R. App. P. 5, I designate the plaintiffs as the appellants for purposes of appeal. The Recorder of this court is directed to assemble the record within ten days following entry of this decision. TvVIarlc V �rccn Dated: March 5, 1999 JU3Ce 2 J TOWN OF ;BARN6TABLE BUIi-DIN PERMIT.,, PARCEL ID 022 095 GEOBASE 1 1115 ADDRESS 104 OLD KINGS ROAD PHONE COTUIT ZIP - LOT 99 BLOCK LOT SIZE DBA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CT PERMIT 39420 DESCRIPTION 4 BEDROOM S.F. DWELLING SEPTIC NO.99-362 PERMIT TYPE BUILD TITLE NEW RESIDENTIAL BLDG PMT � CONTRACTORS: TARDANICO, CHARLES W. Department of Health, Safety ARCHITECTS: and Environmental Services i TOTAL FEES: $775.00 INEi BOND CONSTRUCTION COSTS $250,000.'00 101: SINGLE FAM, HOME DETACHED 1 PRIVATE Pl y . `STABLE. •' MA83. _ - - - - - - . . .-- .� s639. BUILDI ,Bi 41si O Y BY DATE ISSUED 06/28/1999 EXPIRATION DATE TOWN OF,WNSTABLE PERMIT PARCEL ID 022 095 GEOBASE ID 1 115 � ADDRESS 104 OLD X:INGS ,tOAD,. ' PHONE COTUIT ZIP TIOT 99 CK LO+ SIDE DRY . , 8 DB+ioT I,O'.PMENT DISTRICT C T PERMIT 39420 DESCR.11PTION 4---BEDROOM S.F. Dk LLING SEPTIC NC)-99--352 PERMIT TYPE BUILD TITLE NEW RESIDENTIAL BLDCY PMT CONTRACTORS: TARDAN:ICO, CHARLES W. Department of Health, Safety ARCHITECTS and Environmental Services A,! TOTAL FEES: $775.00 `_ THE CONSTRUOT;ION COSTS ,`$' 550,000.00 � Qi► 101 S.CNGL+' FAM. HOME .DETACH D. :I PR :'trATE, P ' .AM—STABLF, • MASS. 1639. J _ BUILDING IVISIOLV C BY DATE .ISSUED 06/28/I999 EXPIRATION DATE,-, x f THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET, ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF, EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY.EN- CROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION.STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OFTHIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF FOUR CALL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND WHERE APPLICABLE, SEPARATE 1.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS THIS CARD KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR 2. PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS HAS BEEN MADE.WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCU- (READY TO LATH). PANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALL NOT BE ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND MECH- 3.INSULATION. OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. ANICAL INSTALLATIONS. 4.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. o i BUILDING INSPECTION APPRRO�iV.A�L.,Sy PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION PPROVALS w^; Tr 2 �•�+�v-�f 2 2 1 HEATING INSPECTION APPROVALS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2a�� 2y ts.�.c� (,��C� BOARD QFHEA H aid 21&iozo- OTHER: SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL 51u��K 6,47:,5i ewlwf �?bhm FTION RK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CON- INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS INSPECTOR HAS APPROVEDTHE STRUCTION WORK IS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX CARD. CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY IOUS STAGES OF CONSTRUC- MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED AS TELEPHONE OR WRITTEN NOTIFICA- . NOTED ABOVE. TION. li III I � I I I I I 6 6 6 b 6 Y 6 9 6 9 Western Surety y n r A i J ri J r 9 LICENSE AND PERMIT BOND F For County, City,Town or Village Only-Not Valid for Bonds Required by the State.Not Valid for Contract, ; 6 Performance,Maintenance,Subdivision,Agent to Sell Hunting and Fishing Licenses or Utility Guarantee Bond. „ 6 g KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: BOND No. L&P-4 27 91. 3 9 That we, Charles Tardanico 6 of the Town of Barnstable , State of Massachusetts , as Principal, U and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, a corporation duly licensed to do business in the State of Massachusetts , as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Town of Barnstable , State of Massachusetts , Obligee,in the amount (Valid only when a County,City,Town_or Village is named as Obligee) of Two Thousand DOLLARS ($ 2 ,000.00 ) (NOT VALID FOR MORE THAN$25,000) lawful money of the United States, to be paid to the said Obligee, for which payment well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves and our legal representatives, jointly and severally. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That whereas, the Principal has been licensed Steet Permit Bond 104 Old Kings Road C o t u i t, MA 02635 by the Obligee. N,NQ i ZE FORE, if the Principal shall faithfully perform the duties and comply with the laws and on ' all amendments), pertaining to the license or permit, then this obligation to be void, o 4sept e ,' `%.in full force and effect for a period commencing on the 18 th day of 4�►= 19 d ending on.the 18 t h day 0 0 0 , unless renewed by continuation certificate. hi rx�apy, 'rminated at any time by the Surety upon sending notice in writing to the Obligee and to tcia, in p the Obligee or at such other address as the Surety deems reasonable, and at the expira- tio � ) days from the mailing of notice or as soon thereafter as permitted by applicable law, whichevetl this bond shall terminate and the Surety shall be relieved from any liability for any subsequent acts or omissions of the Principal. Dated this lath day of 11 9 q.q , Principal Charles Tardanico Principal., Countersigned WE STE R N S U E T Y CO N Y r r• 6 r• By By Resident Agent President 6 r 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SURETY STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA 1 (Corporate Officer) County of Minnehaha j ss . On this 18 t H day of a ug a 19 a 9 ,before me, the undersigned officer,personally appeared Stephen T.`Pate ,who acknowledged himself to be the aforesaid officer of WESTERN 6 SURETY COMPANY,a corporation,.and that he as such officer,being authorized so to do,executed the foregoing ; F instrument for the purpose therein contained,by signing the name of the corporation by himself as such officer. ; r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal. B: THOMAS i NOTARY PUBLIC �� c a SEAL I SOUTH DAKOTA SEAL s �. Notary Public, South Dakota n My Commission Expires 6-2-2003 Western Surety Company r Form 849-A—3-96 ''+ 1-605-336-0850 , i b J ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL G F (Individual or Partners) ; n STATE OF ss b J J b County of b F , F J i On this day of ,before me personally appeared 9 F i J fi 1 ' F e F � b J . b u known to me to be the individual_ described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and u b ! F acknowledged to me that—he_executed the same. b J My commission expires Notary Public ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL (Corporate Officer) STATE OF ss County of On this day of ,before me, personally appeared , who acknowledged himself to be the of , a corporation, and that he as.such officer being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the pur- poses therein contained by signing the name of the corporation by himself as.such officer. My commission expires Notary Public b b G � F r � L @ i r E I r b b — b F n n A Q 0 F n IF F z z z °' b n 4-4 c F T l w 0 44 F , >r � ' 'TOWN OF BARNSTABLE CERTIFICATE OOF OCCUPANCY [ADDRESS RCEL ID 022 095 GEQBASE ID �1115 104 OLD KINGS ROAD PHONE COTUIT ZIP - T 99 BLOCK LOT SIZE DBA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CT PERMIT 45882 DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT TYPE BC00 TITLE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTORS: Department of Health, Safety ARCHITECTS: and Environmental Services TOTAL FEES: BOND $.00 Ox CONSTRUCTION COSTS $.00 4y�' 756 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 1 PRIVATE PI .FE_" ; * iARN3TABLE, MA83. 1639. A� ED MIS BUILDI VISYO BY DATE ISSUED 05/04/2000 EXPrRATION DATE " `" • TOWN BUI I;OF B AlWtABLE _ IR�I►Mg PARCEL ID 022 005 ~'` ADDRESS 104 OLD KINGS ROAD1115 GEOBASL COTUIT LOT ;, PHONE ZIP DBA 99 BLOCK DEVELOPMENT LOT SIZE PERMIT 39420 DESCRIPTION BED DISTRTCT' CT PERMTT TYPES BUILD ROOM+ S.F. .TITLE DWELLING SEPTIC N0.99-362 CONTRACTORS: TARDANICO (. N RESIDENTIAL BLDG..p ARCHITECTS- : � ~HARLES W. Department of Health, Safety TOTAL FEES- and Environmental Services s` BOND $775.00 CONSTRUCTION COSTS $,00, �rT11E $250,000. 0t 101 SINGLE FAM HOM E DETACHED 1 PRIVATE P -_ CJ Fp INKS BUILD DINE !SSUED 06 28 1999 BY -- - =--------- -.� EXPIRATION DATE - THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET,ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF, EITHER TEMPORARILY OH rtt+mr�ivci.,CROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION.STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAYBE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF FOUR CALL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND 1.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS THIS CARD KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION WHERE APPLICABLE, SEPARATE 2.PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS . HAS BEEN MADE.WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCU- PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR (READY TO LATH). PANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALL NOT BE ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND MECH- 3.INSULATION. OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. ANICAL INSTALLATIONS. 4.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. � jl LORI • BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS _�f0P ' e-711319°90 1 Le r 2 ;V4 - 3 .-Z l� CJ 1 HEATING INSPECTION APPROVALS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT t 2 2 v�.c� Cu—C BOARD PF HEA H OTHER: SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL 5�uc�K�!�/�rv%ZiyCf WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CON- INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS THE INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE STRUCTION WORK IS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX CARD CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY VARIOUS STAGES OF CONSTRUC- MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED AS TELEPHONE OR WRITTEN NOTIFICA- TION. NOTED ABOVE. TION. e I MAScheck COMPLIANCE REPORT I I Massachusetts Energy Code I Permit # I MAScheck Software Version 2 . 01 Release 3 I I Checked by/Date TITLE: /D`/ DAD 2D, CITY: Barnstable STATE: Massachusetts HDD: 6137 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 1 or 2 Family, Detached HEATING SYSTEM TYPE: Other (Non-Electric Resistance) DATE: 6-7-1999 DATE. OF PLANS: 6/6/99 COMPANY INFORMATION: EAST BAY BUILDERS NOTES: PREPARED BY CAD DESIGNS COMPLIANCE: Passes Maximum UA = 448 Your Home = 385 Area or Cavity Cont. Glazing/Door Perimeter R-Value R-Value U-Value UA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CEILINGS 1340 30.0 0.0 47 WALLS: Wood Frame, 16" O.C. 1963 11.0 0.0 175 GLAZING: Windows or Doors 58 0.290 17 GLAZING: Windows or Doors 201 0.320 64 GLAZING: Windows or Doors 11 0.310 3 DOORS 51 0.350 18 FLOORS: Over Unconditioned Space 1304 19. 0 0.0 61 HVAC EQUIPMENT: Furnace, 90.0 AFUE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the requirements of the Massachusetts Energy Code. The heating load for this building, and the cooling load if appropriate, has been determined using the applicable Standard Design Conditions found in the Code. The HVAC equipment selected to heat or cool the building shall be no greater than 125% of the design load as specified in Sections 780CMR 1310 and J4 . 4 . TITLE MAScheck INSPECTION CHECKLIST Massachusetts Energy Code MAScheck Software Version 2 . 01 Release 3 DATE: 6-7-1999 Bldg. 1 Dept. I Use I , CEILINGS: [ ] I 1. R-30 Comments/Location WALLS: [ 7 I 1. Wood Frame, 16" O.C. , R-11 Comments/Location WINDOWS AND GLASS DOORS: C ] ( 1. U-value: 0.29 I For windows without labeled U-values; describe features: I # Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? [ ) Yes [ ) No Comments/Location [ J I 2 . U-value: 0. 32 I For windows without labeled U-values, describe features: I # Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? [ ) Yes [ J No i Comments/Location [ ] I 3. U-value: 0.31 For windows .without labeled U-values, describe features: ( # Panes ' Frame Type Thermal Break? [ J Yes [ J No Comments/Location DOORS [ l ( 1 . U-value: 0.35 Comments/Location FLOORS: [ ] ( 1. Over Unconditioned Space, R-19 I Comments/Location I HVAC EQUIPMENT: [ J I .1. Furnace, '90.0 AFUE 'or higher Make and Model Number, AIR LEAKAGE: [ ] I Joints, penetrations, and all other such openings in the building I envelope that are sources of air leakage most be sealed. When installed in the building envelope, recessed lighting fixtures I shall meet one of the following requirements: 1 Type IC rated; manufactured With no penetrations between the inside of the recessed fixture and ceiling cavity and sealed or V I gasketed to prevent air leakage into"the. unconditioned space. I 2. Type IC' rated, in accordance with Standard 'ASTM E 283, with no i more than 2.0 cfm (0. 944 L/s) air movement from 'the,the:• I conditioned space to the ceiling ,cavity. The lighting ,fixture I shall have been tested at '75 PA or 1.57 lbs/ft2 pressure I difference and shall be labeled. i VAPOR RETARDER: , ( ] Required on the warm-in-winter side of all non-vented,'framed ceilings, walls, and floors'. I MATERIALS IDENTIFICATION: - [ ] I Materials and equipment must be identified so that` compliance c`an i be determined. Manufacturer manuals for all installed heating I and cooling equipment and service water heating equipment must be I provided. Insulation R-values, 'glazing U-values; and heating I equipment efficiency must' be clearly marked on the building plans I or specifications. _ I DUCT INSULATION: [ ] i Ducts shall be insulated per Table J4 . 4 .7. 1. I DUCT CONSTRUCTION: - R [ ] I All accessible, joints, seams, and connections of;supply and return I ductwork located outside conditioned space, including -stud bays or joist cavities/spaces used to transport air, shall_`be sealed " I using mastic and fibrous backing tape installed according to the' manufacturer's installation instructions. Mesh tape »may be I omitted where .gaps are less 'than,, 1/8 inch. Duct tape is not ] permitted. The HVAC system .must provide a means for balancing I air and water systems. I TEMPERATURE CONTROLS [ ] I Thermostats are required+ for each separate HVAC system. ., A manual or automatic means to partially restrict or shut off"the heating : I and/or cooling .input to each zone or floor shall be'- provided. I HVAC EQUIPMENT .SIZING [ ] I Rated output capacity of the heating/cooling system is I not greater than 125% of =the design load as specified I in Sections 78OCMR 1310 and -J4 .4 . SWIMMING POOLS: , [ ] i All heated, swimming pools must have' an on/off heater switch and I require a cover`--ufiless over 20% of the heating energy is from I non-depletable- sources. Pbol pumps require 'a time clock. ' - HVAC PIPING'.INSULATION: ' [ ] I HVAC -piping 'donve y,ing fluids above 120rF or chlled. fluids - I below 55, F must 'be insulated,..to the following levels `"(in.) . r r • ,,, PIPE 'SIZES (in. ) HEATING SYSTEMS: ' -TEMP (F) .-' '2" 'RUNOUTS Y"'0-1"' "' 1.25-2" 2.5-4" { Law pressure/temp. 201-250 1.0' 1"'.S. 1.5 '2.0 Low temperature 120-200 a 0:,5,, 1.0 1A . 1.5 Steam condensate any k 1�. 0 1.0 1.5 _ 2.0 I COOLING SYSTEMS: Chilled water or 40-55 0:5` 0.5 0`. 5 1.0 refrigerant below 40 1. 0• 1:0 ' ' -1.5 1,5 CIRCULATING HOT WATER SYSTEMS:, i' [ l I Insulate circulating hot water `pipes to the foll`owfngY,levels (in. ),-: PIPE SIZES (in. ),, -4 NON-CIRCULATING I CIRCULATING MAINS & yRUNOUTS HEATED WATER TEMP (F) : RUNOUTS 0-1" I 0-1.2511• 1.5-2 .0" 2;0+" 170-180 0.5 I 1.0 . 1.5 2.0 140-160 :F 0.5 ' I 0.5 1.,0 1.5 100-130 ,0.5 s ., I 0.5 i0.5 1. 0 ----NOTES TO FIELD (Building Department Use Only) ------------- =---= • -. a .. y _• �� -. i y , a1 v r n n ' TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Building Department- Foundation Permit Date Gp — V? Rom Name • A4 .*Z Z AA1 location �*4V OA /I OIOA**& T 01 .L 77V i7n"o Insp. of Bldgs. ` TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Ma Parcel (� 5 IC tE } p arce INSTALLED IN OMPLIANCZermit# o Health Division WITH TITLE 5 Date Issued e6 cq Z 6 Conservation ENVIRONMENTAL CODE AI`ED Division .i e�G TOWN REGULATIONS Fee Tax Colle // nn Treasur it Z J Planning Dept. t�.® G��v�.v�s--ft -: �...�" Date Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board Historic-OKH Preservation/Hyannis Y +; Project Street Address D - a ' Village l'p'1v t 1 Owner IM,4 P j C &L.L,r¢n� Address Telephone y7"s— wisggr Permit Request wp LLfiv 4 � / &Cd,16449 �- Square feet: 1st floor: existing proposed?,�9� 2nd floor:existing proposed G 3 Total new. estimated Project Cost 0 oom Zoning District Flood Plain Groundwater Overlay Construction Type' ea, Lot Size 0 / Grandfathered: ❑Yes '®-too If yes,attach supporting documen ation. _ Dwelling Type: Single Family R' Two Family ❑ Multi-Family(#units) Age of Existing Structure Historic House: ❑Yes XNo On Old King's Highway: ❑Yes ANo Basement Type: 9'ur�Full .❑Crawl ❑Walkout ❑Other Basement Finished Area(sq.ft.) Basement Unfinished Area(sq.ft) ���v Number of Baths: Full: existing new Half: existing new / Number of Bedrooms:. existing new Total Room Count(not including baths): existing new First Floor Room Count Heat Type and Fuel: as ❑Oil ❑Electric ❑Other Central Air: UR"re's ❑No Fireplaces: Existing New Existing wood/coal stove: ❑Yes XNo Detached garage:-El existing ❑new size Pool:El existing ❑new size Barn:❑existing El new size Attached garage:❑existing UKe"w_ size Shed:❑existing ❑new size Other: Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization ❑' Appeal# Recorded❑ Commercial ❑Yes ❑No' If yes,site plan review# Current Use Proposed Use BUILDER INFORMATION Name_ ,4,2L � .P�s4.�ici� Telephone_Number 2S' Address �aY le 2 License# 9� &S&L12 oid Oy,6.5-<� Home Improvement Contractor# /I 5 3S!!2 Worker's Compensation# t C rn 45 6,6 37 .4 w II ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO c L �/i i G L •��.�ic E'7r"i- SIGNATURE DATE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PERMIT NO. DATE ISSUED MAP/PARCEL NO. ADDRESS t" -VILLAGE � ' OWNER 1 *` - - ;•� - - x ' � � r � - DATE OF INSPECTION FOUNDATION 'H FRAME a ' INSULAPIUI ..,.. j21 .3, - t FIREPLACE.,_: .. ,- ELECTRII AL: . : ROUGH FINAL' 1 PLUMBING: ROUGH w FINAL GAS: ROUGH j- - FINAL FINAL BUILDING � 1 , ,i , DATE CLOSED OUT t r ASSOCIATION PLAN NO. rt ; 1 , � 1 © Nil i Irk. . ■ `�' :��� II I111I��p �9 In}IJRI�/ '{Nyy I , �1 1.•.� 1-.dG.�. I� —Ie71�jl I^"i111 I I 1 11/ .a ,I� �Y� I i� I 1 1�,1 1■■■■ � ■■ � •�m■nmmm•I L ■■ �J 'p I , ■■■■ F ■■■■ a ' fliii rn� ''nn �__' ■1 11'I I w �. �1 , 1 ■■■■ ■■■■ 1 r 1 1 I is 11441I _ 7unn1 n n 11 11 1 I.1 n 1 a•u 1I�m n uu 1 1 / = 1 I . ■■.■I ■■■■ I Il rl I :: A11i IAn: .'I. 1 I�i �:� :% ��Ilflyl� 1 I 1 I I�� I'■ ' 1' i y n ■■■■■■ 67 , 1 1 I I 111 11 I I 1j��(In/1,I son on oll man ■t .■■ ��— �� �► — — — Ijnirli I� liuV�li'u t ���_ =1���z In■1 lu■I ■■■ lu■I In■I .. .... _iI�.LI�.IIVll911_IIIIII LI:I�JIIII_ _Il�ll.1.1.L�IIIl1IJ_II_IIII(I:I.I.I.Illlll_, �:: illllliilllililll�illl illlllllllllllll�lsli_ �� �� I. 0 � ■ ■ 1 1 Ism t ,{}Iumaln•�I wa�liumwn/nynn I I nS rin■I 1■nn.un ■u u•Im■nl, ul � �1 �� _ I I- IL{�I 1 ■II 1�I1B�I�ql �1 n � II.In�.�Y11VYnlYI■(I"v. � _ I ,•I�I•III "i I�I iN�M1' I III■ 111 u I I I I n I I1 I I � I ... �y� © '�,� I� '�9 1 I I 11■ 111 1 II. 1 I\11 I 111 I ... DUI I II 1 III 1 I III II ;I Ill.lr I 'IN II II 1"•' n 1 1 I II 11.11'W I/111 1 t �I 1 I rl l f :::' �1 1 IIII II '111I�I' ■■ 1 I I I 1 I 1 jm I 1 e I .I I ��.. 1 n 1 1 I I 1 I�w nul�umnl�ur•i■ luu I IID. I I�. � I ■Iql I I�•1 I 1■1 11 III I�I I n 1f11 It � ►.+, I I I III I I•I 1 11 I I I I I-.__—_ �� ��:, I I �1 I �III�I 111 11 91 I Il�a� IIlBa1■INI IIIII Ilal 1 I 111 11 I I �� 0 I �)Ay■/ 1 I 11 nn 11 numl�lun■Iun.nulnlln.lii.I I �yI�i 11,i 1 10 _ I I 1 I��1„I I 111; 11 1 1 1111 1 1 I 11 I Ilnf 1 I 1 1 _ _ ____.11.t',.J�1.. M11 MEN 111191i1�l�lllg "' 'III ::: C: 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 � Ilil //� ■.°°...°; p� ■. -"�� IIII ���■ 1111 1111 11111 1111 1111 IIU 6 111 II :::n a:: iii I� 1 U ,LJ 1�,=11III�II�IE —=== ------ US us i e - - .. � .•. p 4 mY era sal.(MI 'i r ---- pr.awa6'� r- r.aw 't T L_J L_J CELLAR- I IC-OG I I\\.\ le R46C � K P 1 �!I[QLW M4N.LL IrR MY1®A�.W..aI AS � _ jX - 1 12'.• - .la C 1 1 Wa1CW PQr Ml9t[O! QIVMHA[ t rrwllfY.11 lar- 1. ��y//.ft/SMCFO. • �Om I4IE[ w 1 f I MNR.leG 9C' N611— etrQ I'. 1 UM 616at-fW TCY .. '-• ^-l»I+�/{.t.� I �� .. ra+s aanxlu ae tt� � $I I 1]� _ Yxc\I,w lul- 1 yNl Y u ovo�ror rwet me P�` 1 1 " I 9 I LL!?i.i• W/�_O PPvT 1 1 M�I(GIgIND aR D OQ I ` I w a TJ•- ~ I _ -1 (qr� rdtn I .z � r .. fM51L IA!l1 Y.u. ra.M.flsn was _ 3: ' T• e� i. rWra rro _ L1J L.J. t:_J l_J L_J . s-0 1 WY-ITI r-: rti- Y-J 9-41 ry-Y is 1 - r a e e ei ei e 24 e -LNI DVGAVATED o ,3 F - e•;1 w+r.r lwal I 4 rr wir.r ,.k -.,.«. „F�r. :...a.!�, ;>�...a:�Ana 2. },•._..t, _,"w „-. ...,r. ..:,�.._'s..a — µ sµ .r 1 •�> wr -.�, - _—"E�--. `__--{-}----__ F}—__—__�'I - 7 tK craw eQs k� � '. . - MODIFIED 8Y • _ G�1LAR'PLAN Vr F,y HOMES • - awl wm�� - 79 p"'b � :; 'tievxx+a G ���{�-�;Ps ;"' �•"r' ri. ..r v.-.� €q b` c s r.rs,'. -. .T.- .e. �^`-�.. �'';Y :�= sici"r+. .�''," '�,,ta.. r K_(,; �" s• "c„ `ty 1y''k ,.1 +:. .r` r ..u..vxx.� .,.,�"T ..N .,. r.. w -.. ... .F.... -.r,- ..,;- _d -, ... F-a�.wx`s'�,.,1.� ;;.•y :,^. p... - '':.i--:rj>t'Sb 7{`,'i.• '� k,. - any .. k �n �-`.„'�.,p �/ w.aria*< faa 1�,..m,.+,. .gw 6�I,n "� rr"Y` r' •�.`-.z '�•.,� , I: tllrato w511• svr. �•� '.a.F.V�(PAaira ex to ax uxl f.5 K.5lf W ': M]l9td Nee naea Wf.fvxa ilrN � >-s- Si� rti . Ky Y.Y PR :. ., ", �e c• �. . ._ - ICfb perry i5f1 Irr ®} -.8r'�. +,., - p - m ,�, `.4 •• ,t5 c ,.. utaaaom �Nro' .. ':'/ . a a wa .>9 �,'�. f •: �,t' 6 Wm xl0Uld1 (xb Asa:. Lo�, �xxuo-ra50WFIST RM } xNCR �3�� M - 'Vr.rPaxPaaax . - r.n q --_--_-- �• 1 ar f f-f rdl �.^., �d. Lrd �Ar.rlmrue5rOv1 6R€Ar RMM5M MPFZM. i .. Q KITCHEN PLAK rc rcrera p — � Vr-ro a I. I FMr. 5onrueo P+»' J a. {./ y nfAwmasra e'P ' - �iw. r R � e P •a __ v- - v _xSL4A VA WT_.rra -_ :. T � - - arm `• Ptt bra O . pll>b gE rUV 1 VvZL r\-, � Mnu r@Ix%IB 'i - . ! MP - - - p1 r.5T me $ 5x5 a5 ra i tt - n . rrP, to nc ?.yai r-:—vo. �:. "lh h wa./ae x.«xx n T R. us R ELEVATION # xsam pxl _ � Irr srP5r9m �w�qq11��g ffi A+6rR' I s.xum. _ - - I w P' I rP uma IQ N .ry A. �. � .• � 4 T11: roaSR. i DPIR�i RM .• 1- IW�p R - .' �qne oamam.ae FovElz x..... p ... a .._,. .gr.frnrruov pwl s r.fnxuo-ra � 1� ` r 1 a+R Iona _ Y ` Two G/R enWKae.p k. --- .' I Ixt V.T-Y 1�1"..i. ur�IOAtp j. F � a ,.;:... •/,:v'; ?'xi Zrafrcee:, 8'•-r-.• 4- _ _J:. :. rr-� nrgryarroxs .,. #. - _ em _ T4.' ;' � I �• f1.VRi011GIQ� p� .. �EL'EVATION.,:.� 4 F, r: • rf nxe m-' va5e z.rry oa-' la u5eiu rrla '_. T.. .»$ a sT � ...� '•�'ofaa war de¢xa� '..:�., � _ - ., . - use ,asa r.ca roux r/v5a. _I - -rc xxa ae r/ar 5ar- ru.az f.f xAxSe r/Nf - - - al�iwl�ma .�+ MODIFIED BY a� a�vArlaN #3 ' Kro Mr.SN'.5 •aa•nV wVp59©1 - - FIRST FLOGR PLAN xa T.'vr.N W.anxrapamyq HOME DE"'SERVICES — ' urrn xv.A-.ame u. r lerl rm�i.�W�s KIT6t1EN ELEVATIONS r .'+. •A' „F,:^.i tea- x' +`v`' �.w � iL ..x«-,-' r.. sx :r.,.. �+-.. =x '�* _y....w. .k.. .d ,.I'.t � is �>M .r .e....,.� _ ... :k__ ../. ., .+- w•�r:y�..,,. <:+ 6•,•I ,:�-..-:.,..,'�,..r;V ��'"• i•, r� �- .�. 3�.. ..� r ,:.,.. ,1• ..,+o� .. ..�r _, ..u�' 1.��t�..� Y w,<.G.. r*,. .,,>,.,•„w..�a.. .�*nr,d' .. s. ,.. ... a-. ._..-... ..�.z�9 �.. 1. .#" v:e' '� xN'- ��. r }-' ...: .. s. .:....•n. .n ... ? .. -,- n.,.,.... 5. 5.': �.. .v.•.-.-.. �_t... .q�M •l."N `.?. ..:1: ', e.:� r. .,,.. ,w;.. ., " _- .. t,,a '13..c ...lv -n'�; .'.:: Fy,:. a. 4 ...- x r. •. ._�T.:.--.... '.:. r.4+..w .. b+�'e. i«r ✓<.11.a ..0 "y -., J�. �i Xrt-t..:�.........h♦1§k l.. ...... F v .r .. 'S��. - :.R,�..� �j •,s �:,.-a:. °fi �'�'F.:.< j.. .^.a,• •- ,.» :, ..,.,,. ., .. ..v :,..:..,.w. .,<.f �, -' �:v+. .aaww ;Y s',. a,: t F d. w�.6r.�"„�5:...,:Jti �" �k�p..b�`xP9���. _,�.,,�,,A'''Y�i y,.�3 .4�.Ur,��aak rrA;'�"+i� 1dtr��+.: _ �. 'a i'PRe's.{}�_. .. ,.. � .'�fa++«'S��:wAo.,...,,,• � .;�m;....x-ra~R,)..:e..w,d�..,i�sw.,,•..\�• mt - : ° �V c.y,_ _�•. :^� .n _ �' FIR4III fD'MlIs1T' � _ ,. .. Fo DrT5r RIM ..• . HM1K �I, RMIEE[ /' � �,IKAS 4Q fVf Ml51B3 �' � // .,- .. � �I*2 Si -I- ------------- 21� ———— r� AMC,SPACZ _ '---'-- ' J I .� _ _ y to in f0�f 3 Hti rI p1ti / •{_{ Ih XPRM J v',��.�a.€..P•.:.,�ti�. ,�?',-�•-,'�r'.atE's_'...'+s�N..,C�:2�'��cr�:`,,�.r.,.,k�,�a.?��,�S;wz'�2,"a�'S...1.yLnkF�'!'a fi:�,.•t+.t-.S��.,�°•-ie..•'��,:y,�+,S*•.._��.•-:,��a"Ea M ft'�G''�-.R:.,.O'.^...4Y`,�ty,�FIN.4�..��R-'ss.�?'',;,�:�`�.,-.F Esm�.'�,,'S"�L.&*Ox;fr irt O°�ol.!�s Ra_;s'.-..;��..;,�F^i���+€'a�r ta.++...r���v,'x�-i S..,�-'�,�,w,....rv.:'z�...,'a1�-�4a�r't,�•x}-'wes.t.",1�,�I'a Ix:•�::,"'!A�'t�'...�''"�a'.�,�w'y',Rrr�.-�T��«'�utt�>s�.+ffi5^.�_^-:,'�.'.srm.b..-. '�'�e_'�n II�"d,1 l�IsIi1��..w.ae.I1iII v.,`'.I�cI�,1,i.s.:s.^^•,a._,4 w1 y —Jus. r ok q ¢ PLAN .+. fim.t2•"►'o's,.e f•4iwR.x+yan a.w�.n�amm-w _► - MODIFIED, BYHOMEDESIGN SERVICES 4w m.. . ' _ ' :d..' , 8s'1. - m}A�,+�+` 2'^'.,' a '�.{ {.2�R9 Y?' w•3�^k.:A�«sY.k« lW. '.n"; E�'t..�ry.i-�Araw d$.• a''r`wh.4m,...4,. .�v _.« a'v..,,••n 3.r�«Nt wh>-K nw..... .. i_.. , _ .r rrntw r.rxa•%a Ym nrx.ra.Nm ' 4 a _ fHAarA r.swrap x - -y,, •, rliurro-la "'. ..•,.f�. � _ .. p -� n els rap! sbDRrs . 7* Whl WCJ10.d' - p - '#'� ^n'N rf>•ra Ym R _ ++,ar pe7wn- --:.r.rvara _�• nrn-rc f - _ IRtie mOV nrxY ra f.e-r .. - 'ka' it'r xi.ra.armaaCr fpn rRro- d -' Is✓ns w -r -` 4 r r m R 'r— nrui.ra rm - nrx+rapom - - r:rlex _ rwe wr+. nlwusra _ wvwa ea hr PA arts r,r x/✓n �- BEDRM AZ p � r�RQ�R MMf70x Wr.lna)y -`nlxaa T � nrA•ra�- 'D"°x wmaee roxra.. - ns-rare a.rzv _r.rrbra0rm nlpuaara o -` r.rA-raWmaa a'�»e�i tea. E 4 .. ",• role VFST RM,: p d CKFST RM.. .,.K)TG2IEN T n n lnms Wnr i .rraw ro'. s/D'R<l arts LALN if�a R-Nears .� sVr.rrvar xx Ws7 �r .. � nla.r'a4m ' •T -p r.rnRcw Wr.r .d t GREAT RM 7 nrArC1000DY1619 2 1dI'N I:COA i•YTOr04 I-KL .T PNDry RM i a.f as vim- _ - D-7 fav rR l r oG.- - im n l lc.RG - i.e rax uw srG mm ae x7 ao- - - 6A58�IT s srr R'A wrn �tfOA IY D4 . - rLGrRle`A!O� tdpA Or04 - i.r T-OrOG imlc«rm nrmew �iT�� BASEMENT. 4�4 r1160 - �D .- SEG11ON n�or�aWr7 r lNUws q Vr-ram. --_ _ II e _ d ' D'Pt x3l afb D•� Y ra D'RR •'S YYi pa'N - .• ::_ ww Daryl Y-a frm W r=!r.1ei aas r.r ror GARAGE d iRlvwpt� - ".'a3awRe lay \' r[G Oa'11 frruew t.![araBra - � ueax.Rua taa- ` � - - f.rxa✓aafm Wasuaearm,au i •. - �alLtel TAT pLf". OO - nrrssw ueaT uiYv .. _. �. - R• a�iD�ee YSrR wrlr�1 las als sae rxrrow. �RearsrDrarrr nr. i':'.4,�.rfi L n�F�It.�:llrA4 j S �J_,S�,,�.M�Y.~ 8rWn....':.la ilF a laS�:.'..:3n a'�r„y YrvMf-wrrrla a:vm,n 7iR P� rrw.t-1•,BoE - ;' W�rmrs a rram�nua aeaiwraaerq aDux. -L - r.rraed - np.r-xxlm.Ar a 0m f anaa tz.^..im.:f.Z V r-1 .Rau06 VI P5 N rraw f = t - ..—_ —. :,�'h ...W h G,wIG7W0 v'�-.w"`..q�[.,'4 ::.� 3 a�,.,• s �'E""'` w.-.: .. ... .,' .. -.. "'=:t Lark` :e -;41.k ...,�.....«.: -.„.;a. -,.b .a:€.!'"r�.'�,..s,...s„'»..n._.. ? F ,,. 'R`^ - - sN.r'Ya rin.vaR.•` p i� ^+':� p � f ,.� J u[azasa�'•,y t .-` '' `nrla•-rapm - ` Sex � ,• r .,LR �.r rx�no-r m . kr rrucw .f D-7 1 i r4 mom D wr '�� -.vpdr. £ W�� �'; e 4 0-GM \ � b'"F rLx�' � D'al 'D•'qr '~��• -. a mm-ixa 41i - MSfR-C®fad.: DraorD.mp'r7. d Y nrrx-ra K: - d 4 -l�REA d w t MSTR.6ATTt .. rwwmmmr ene prl:. 11 r:�s r.✓ ra m wr - i_ L .. "J .:. .., rr i.IpNlraG Lp 10IC.OL LIpT1r OG.. ^ d �, uerr.areaw MODIFIED.BY - Vr vir-+e — HOM��S .'. SECTION yr-w � _::i ..a+ 1f i'0 h`-. ./).-,h'M'4' � �w-k.. 'r:n ••. +ly2y � ..... F 2^� . A' '+e::u h' W. .M4�: �` _ �.:. .�M.. ,. .: :. .. ,w ....:u..,.:2}.�.,. .,� :.-.i, i...-.�'- e..w:.:v .•• -p:.: i .A.'. 'f :tts" .p *f. S d: .','T. 'rk .F. - «. _ ....... .:._.•... ;+..,:x, t..'. ,. .. ... ., � ,..Yw ��,..�e;'�.f dxx, . ..,.i �' +1.. '^.=r -'...,.. � sY �R, r . :. 4'h r?,.....�, r�`'-rt�:.. x� ,.€ -.4r{a:..'.a±:.� .f;-C.....-.. ..,:�."D .,....,�, tc,tii..: �,,.. :.,..',xr ., ... 1M. -:<.. .'D.. � e.. .�'...� "d+-..a•,� 1 ..: :. ,. ,t- ,'r_....., ..,.. ^+r,: �a. ..:_.. ... .yr. �.. .,.. .1-.,... �'e T„�?` �'.., 1+-.�.- � -.r:. ?5. *t. : -ice.- x7i. :..ram.-t Y, •.t: :,. +, i :`+, -�i3: 7y.:*' •^sr. r€ wry -;;,�;. :.�;. L:- ,e"' -C t. •�""��:`s s `s�. .F.,.,u „,i.,: ii}`"i;.,o-. .ye �. : :;. ss. ''.•dr=- .FRS. i,,, lr„. -ik :fc,.� a r - ,fs ri aa:ia d rt rrt� .a'�, i��.Y�+�'ay�w�.r7r,,�„�°`.,'ty'w� 3 ...:.., .. • :x'r'�..,:x.�.�,�'.�,�..,w-%dk'., .. -.A.. _. µ�.�'`�..,-.� xi. k�.�, `,:..- .. A^.r } x+• s YU O iV.LU.L LOT 99 m' 90,096 sq.it. F Of N tig°` ti� DOYLE O Na� � m9 yso � �q Assessors Map 22 — 95 I GERM THAT M BTRUCVJREB ARN SHOWN ON THE PLAN A8 TIZY. mm ON THR ODOM 9-Z DATE ]PROMSIOM IM S B PLOT PLAN PmAm mm Charles Tardanieo LOCATox Lot 99, Old Mngs Road, Cotuit DAM 00102Z9p FWOD PLM DATA Locus does not He in a flood hazard zone p PWAM Br. STZPM a DO= Arm AWOCW= . AMU W LLAM EMT FALMDUM ice, l (o TO'd 0Sbb0Zb 01 20SZ LBL ZTE W08A WUES:90 666Z-20-80 I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ONE ASHBURTON PLACE, RM 1301 L BWTON, MA 02108-1618 CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR LICENSE Number: Expires: Restricted To: 00 CHARLES W TARDANICO BOX 304 HYANNISPORT, MA 02647 Keep top for receipt of address notificat.' W."�. .�•-)� :.' _::t 'k e q k.. .,.�k+. g Fi ,,�:•� .,t.�t��,^+T"'" "� ��f•� �'t. :f.:b � �' t� ';�`dR.,�� ?'.. I - t ? a l�'�'e''�L f._�. �.: ,firiPRQVF�fENTQ TQR$4REGISTRATION p �j! ,Ba rd Bu dins` �e u]�� PRs'aand Standards V 1100011`1301 1. Y b Bo� on � Massy u �'�+�t tail `.+ •i -tg c' ...J'+ w R it � +� :-�i' .�. �<A' , ,. •T N' s b.Sc Y.� �+ - �'' EM �VT1, Ate RA ., ,t �_^ t ..}s i° �,.�t ��t,E'�,fir ,r'1� �•cF r± d r +:SCR. �t��in s s� rvp Ex ��� ��e!07 i r `+ y}a. r..9.. .+.•,,r . g, { -stcC+�p�(: � .:v{ 47� < fir .±MT i �'���s e'er 5 zs tel-._`�.r• iAy R `:CONTA �f . _�. 4.�+F��;��rt,rj"�' t .eF.7 �,+.: .i� ,� t i!a{. t a .3v ,rkd �}�7 •,,{ �,s Y I :. f'' re S �:i, .,.> r : �..•..tl� JQ a(s, e v ;� 'Y�`}y .in i Y,! h ]F' �"b�j� y` f.M1 .�� �k,;� .. ',.� '4W`W.S�+•q ,�M s�.i I! �� .1°egatf aL�o1C�lV7t j D �X ry b; 1 4 tr r W'f r 'CNARLES 3 ` 1 AMU �+� .•rya 4; Y. x ► '�i pfra 4n: /Q7 1 0( }': .n. (� ° - ` �p/�i' L.y •`� y r :1.'''"s°' ivy. Y" ) 1 „ b� wr .tl �4 r{, 4(,, 05 hJ� F;ri .,. `?o � OSTERVILL 2655 k ° j' I t� �rb ^ HARLE 'I�:#T yC �' 05A1� :, � *.` �`�caM�.o�'•���49'�ERVILLE'MA' 02655Et!' . . ADMINISTRATOR CY MO GGa, °c Briton, htass. 02111 Workers' Compensailon Insurance Affidavit name' ✓ / D� / /'7 location phone= ,� 0 1 W homeowner performing all work•m}self. P-ram a sole proprietor and hive no one working in any capacity 'F"•• � r'rT r •tr•tr �r C] I am an employer providing%corkers'compensation for my employees working on this job: �, , cit• - phone He I^t�w ce ca. ///LYO`�14/�/v',/ �� ^ • Policya 11ii�i .'�`! .y,>—.�•..-. --+ r- 0 Y•ttyr;;:t •L��+�,cee•.�'t.'v:^T�L 0 1 am a sole proprietor.general contractor;or homeowner(circle orte) and have hired the contractors listed below %%ho havC the folio«ing«•orkers' compensation policesr tQintLnS•n. nhonc y — -- Insur•nce co.- nolicti N �.. .•• y�v1,,LL•�� company name, phone a• a . insurance co policy _ c�Cttii aiftttlfiid �l Failure to secure coaerige as required wader Section 2-SA of�tG4 lS2 e=tt It ad to l6l,t it iodaa flat aIf 0 peaaktes aft titer up to ndtr lt:Qo and/or one years'tnspttsotlment is*ell is ttWl peaattlts in i6i rarta or t STOP WOttK bRDE1Et taA a clue of f100.00 a dsy Ef oast me. t aadecttand'that i copy of this statcancnl tnsy be fora aided to the OMct at Investigations of the DIA for toy age Witladds, do hrrebJ cerrifj under the pains and pcnaGtcs of perjure•rhat the tnjoritwion provided abate is'true tend comer. .� gate,.. 7 Signature Phone p Rrint nameI WWI" ��ri� ` . oRiciil u e onl} do not%rhe in this teei to be compictcd by tiq or town 6intial ^V city oe tourer. - _ perniit%licensi M r•tt uiidiaf`gair i dme Meat'` 0 _cc, cenio `�cheek itirnMedUte respLonse is required Seleetn►eo`s Ofnte [jlte tltb Otpiitnient r frin�i�t n.Pn�• : • ------- .phone p` _ - - ` ___flQthcr_�--- -_ice � G k. .:,_ � ���� ��c� �����J ' f7 ✓ �� �� � `'�� � s } � r �/ /f L March 8, 2000 Please be advised that the room noted as "study/bedroom" is not a bedroom on the attached plans. Furthermore, the current owners have no intention of ever using this room as such. Builder Owner L Z y i t J. T t* 1 5 p3 March 8, 2000 Please be advised that the room noted as "study/bedroom" is not a bedroom on the attached plans. Furthermore, the current owners have no intention of ever using this room as such. Builder Z, Owner 2hA e!:�o 7-6, r l I Q • .x r - 1 1 I I 111 I t1:Ipj1 1� ' I I /�� . I 1 11`1I1 yl�11� I 1 •I I'' f 1 14 11 •• r JI .Il�li 1. I I =-1 1 ` 11 uII1 I 1II i I'a1�! 'n1 i 1�'li1�-1—mi.1—Lt—�■�I Il !71, mit , ' -i Il■6�mi1Ll�l�i- I I Il i, iI I a1rll1 1`I��I i�11 I.1� ..... n. ■■■1M■■J ��yJqp li-mit t■ � mI e1 L.l�AII1 q.n- uIn 1 1 liumit�ILso mitt' n i - - 1 � �� •�� � � _ - , - - �hhrlllllu��11 I I I``I�r`i11 I II. ■..I =.■ lit■ mitt: soon■ ■t�l ��■ ■. =.._ 'o, -- - �. i - ilrulSl 17.Hm I sou nc ono ■n milli I: .I ...I= =..�el lint limit son ut; u� =��.f =U non! nl� soli■ - - - omit lull ■■a _:i■I ■. 111 Ipi ilnl tiM1,111,11 l ■■■■■iI — �.._l �_l- ��111� soli.■■ — -- _` i�laaalllfl:ll_II�III:I:I �I,I llaaa l'liiJ I'llIM11s;l l ll_IINeil -' ___i!Ililiillliiiihlll_li9il'1ii19111i�i1911 r i - M' IiV'8 7!iiinY i'Vi1Ti(iiii1", -'illjiiilliiiiiliiiilTs t ■ �. 11! II.IIIII I IIIII.HIq. 1�IIII�ZIIII.IIIq.11lq.l �I 11 I III L/111 I I 1■IIIIi�IIIiNI lll I IOI■IOILIIIII '�w s� 1 JI I milli 1III III 111111. 111.1 I � � OsolOil.luYl11H7�r '--' '�I I I I Ills. III I ■III I.u � I n l I �, I I I 1 `PI� E'♦ 1!��I �� I I , I . I 5��� ■.I I.111l��1�:I r I�: I ' .i I 1 1 I 1 i ..I qi III �I�I� IJ�111�11� d��lili 1 I� ■tmi d� 1� Yn II''I I,�� i li III I .III. �1 I H I : 11' 1 11 I 111 I I I f ■tt' ���I m �1�1't 11,E 1 II�1 11 : III r �' �li I q�� IIIL i�Ill I1111 ill`I1�III IiP 1 q` ��III�����If I' I! i IIII I 1 i I IIII � I I� ! L...,I 111. .I 1 el 1 14 10 I I��III �''1�MI I� 11' I I IIIIIII .10 IIIII m00 1 I i (I[I��� 1 � Ol 11.I _ /� n 1 I I IIJJ111 IIIII HI���I I�lu w•4 1■IIN 1q'' ulu1�H1L,a .�ei � � .u.l Ifltl� i•. , 'I .11`i'. II 1 i1 ����1 ,�U �1� 11 I1■�e1 1; 111�1 ! 1111c luu I� �Illn �II,1 1 I I� 1F; ���,���YYY flFl- �YI'1L�f.. II •' i ! 1 ,, 111� �II'�II.II��II IBlli'1■IIII:�IIII iiii /!f1 P ; I I I I�■� /I■ ® 1 1! I Ik 'I.III I 11 .1 LIII I li �r }1 -- A II I i'!I I� . 1 I - Iiwn�� i; I 1 r� m�I•.nli.nmangn�{ fl / I�il n 1 q h I( I I I uT __!I!;!!AL,L�.11111R1�:1:!.,L:!!IA'All::!I!J!A'!9!A'1::411 ��•e•LLLII IA�AIII, 1 ,-1 IIII lV1fi„Inl!�d.� IIII IIII' 0111: ■..�' IIII; IIIIi �IIIII IIII IIII; (IIII ��� ���� ���� sou l;i a III loll lull ...■ 71I1; Iu1 Ii`III� 11�IIi IIII; Iu1I Irl �n au riu■ u1, soli .I�li�9iii9;lii� ® IIIC .... lllll IIII' 11111 (IIII'IIII!'IIII!� ��� '��� I:::� : jj •• �- — ���— lur I■�.■ IIIL IIII IIII �1111�11, p111� IIII ��■ �.■■■ ■■pl ��� �� ' 111 „■ ■.. i���III II�IiEI� Ro i . .. r-G- Td rd I+-! r-r Rb >-r :b• rr r a rm • --- ---- anrla � � r-'' nruw .T L-J 1 I I • L-J .. ' y e.•. s� 1 I ©nw I f 1 1 I F rb' I rb• , r 1 yWA 1 CELL/AR i Y'G4 1 1 1�' NOG e I �IR IUOG.MWdI ILf M'N®9m AGNx•M 0 y pK -1 11� I$ E 1 1 xrl¢IG rynle vR xgxrxe 1 1 1 i f m a.mow pow � 1 1—, lr.fVS IaGG +� 1 1 IwRU09C mG1R v1n1RWOI 1 1 WMaal-TP 1111G1 /rKTI f! R 6 ss C aH/IM�rJI � T IM WKrNtN ttK gi ; x/rdr fR 33, . Q rrrcvG fow 1 LLQG�O>r®I/nG L uxr.r.r LC.M�Nsr 1 1 MAR uwsma GYG! am 9g 1 1 II :r 1 . , a 1 5' caarrtdeael-1 m— }na- L_J L_J L_J L_J L_J L_J rr L J L_J P I 7 el � 4 iArmm au•u. >w.m.rKnwlw - c 1 ICE 1 L1J L_J LT, L_J LT, e� ; e b KM' 11 I 11 1 1 ttK e e rm am T 1 1 I ra oar) a s ei ei ei ei at 81 at s: e � ej 81 Hi 61 s/ � 81 B U4EY4AVAI W ' I 1 1 1 1 1 p w..rlxm LIn r i 4 p a1K . — tans . u[amre•ra r. D-r t •T-! MODIFIED BY CEUJAR PLAN I` W t s HOMEEDESIGti— SERVICES ' �. , w�WI�Mo..f~I•p•emu • .l,.�r tl Zb'aet •, �' I I`F ..�F.•• yY�'�`.1'C?r,�`k ..-..4 d�Yi�'"`, F. r.�� �.�,.;.4�'�',Vtn; f•''„1,!'.E�'� :.-5i v 'xyY.�,�;-'` ti A^,,�~ � .. T,. ' M���CrrrW(Iwo RR1/Y4�I r.f�1•T/i ryyl�r s-r :_r r-p rd s-f r-•- p-r rd N rd Sd i;_, . raam Mrra@rWhfwwr YM air) - ' aL 11Yaw Marl _ Y.C wt _ utrwrm nw e irm own NM r r r r 8 . wvlwlft Wrw L �I6 a rr rr +^ rw �, f_p Sti rIM1 M r f r.cw1 IAr•�u � ¢u '4 r. nmsra sTnrtr `�-'---1 4 r= � . e B fu,o WW-4 pS4 -am�RMr rP y _m_ - `Yod \`Y'♦ Sd r.Ilnmmra 4 aarr J r. i r a nC6a pY1 iAM1M1 wII dIr�, S� ptt M1ae erg T �� Ora pu+7 � .t s � � � =.s • r-! f T_r r_T rs � � arasaaa s � Wn rva na 4 ' +K•rva wTn.=ml ar :3 � fi% T ------- 1�, • ' frf Y 1 f t'-.' rd Id 'rd mr.emoGlarprl e le ttmr �/♦l\�a t er tag r. nr'Tx orvra� z t I[Lq F!1 PLAN KITGFEN 4 �'e y,r g •t y I cry 1 -- . ant Vr-Fe --- 3 g y alttr `§ mr K_ru.aarrw dal ' $ ti.y P -1, r 4 y tt pe P ♦ Rara Wnra r PGRLtl '__ O +� .Y II r . . _ r____^_ c W w arm aa�n am y¢8' Ir r-.• ✓d.ed eo '• .f1 .. y .� _____!ago_ Y ` ? otagya M1s az �,.ell Wnr _ 6 a • -- !4 2 . Tr r.r•ra wn •t WMTWrr ELEVATION #L as•m Ors rm1 I Y r Im ae+mm y ,`• � ` r `Nm } TMR a ' DNWC�RM Y i• pP tt 4ilDt/ ne ra!r marraa pl I 9 ` Q tom- 1'd ♦ -!' 1 R•! I� ! Sd� _. ✓y-rrw f f f ` y � e eeevran FpypZ r 4 A r.tnrluar PA e - r.tnwlr•ropI� ___ �- iwR M1I[✓ TWO GAR&ARAGC tt i --9TIN! - _ wawen waswm..aa■ .:ni/Trstrc as - rd Tti- F we r:., •IE Ip/ewrww Tj r.! 1 8 -8 rot It To lw[C n✓ •. .,,ry .. '! r as •=r r-p rc cIr - ro� n faataWn Ir. MMer mrr'.r.r r w r.famna Tarawa=/ar ar- iisri wee '/r+r• ' 4wrm w.Teaw ' am wrrnrmi - . Nd rWt �d od . ♦Tf OALl1 MODIFIED BY rnswa. wm —ION m�rpra ra 1�"'K..K.Mr/rr^luw N w�wera pri y FIRST FLO molf.h K• Y nr.w.aw ael sr:h s K•K r.uaaarll® —�—�N HOMEDE31(3N SERVICES yr.ro KlrO-EN ELEVATIONS i r�7f''•1 . - +f.�•S-A < .;i Fed _�� +�,._�'��*�'r,.t?,t..� F�'1�fi55 t;_; .. r. °. , x+,z.J:•:' tt. a r.� ,��.,?,�{,1r r`,r7 4'Gi '.t -'. ..- .. .. oC) 4uW Wrr 1N7 / mv�ra.Ve rat srnK .^ or"v/r.r.uemn __ _--_---___V __-_ , _ �� o ATTIC SPACE (pl r.rv. u.rulmmvew wl ---------- f�L' II SIIS Y I. f - a DATH gz ! .ao uti ♦ r 1 ! 6ti i ( Y_ - - it ----� p ------ felvva rllmw 1 11 11 ^! ; 11 I1 I I II'� 1 11 II iRR a111f TPIOFr�.vl 4y 1 1 11 j I I 111 K1IN IIQ� 7 i ' I I 1 1 �II�_ � 1� I 1� 1 UrORfIN110i 0i SECOND FLDOR PLAN MODIFIED BY V<—K LWO AM*/P fqrr. I HOMES r r r I TOP FOUND. EL. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO D.E.P. TITLE 5 AND THE TOWN OF �',A��.�1A> _ RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE_ WATER TIGHT COVER 11� 1, - Z 2' MIN. - 1/8' To 1/2' WASHED STONE 2. AT LEAST ONE ACCESS PORT OVER TANK TEES SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE r LEV& WHITHIN SIX INCHES OF FINISH GRADE WITH ANY REMAINING ACCESS ro INV. EL 3s•g --� - - POPTS BROUGHT TO WITHIN T', LVF INCHES OF FINISH GRADE. D r NFR_TRATOR �� UNE 0 2 3. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE SANITARY SYSTEM SHALL BE CAPABLE OF 10• YIN 41N. INV. EL 6' J -11 3/4" — 1 1 2' WASHED STONE EFf. DEPTH WITHSTANDING H-10 LOADING UNLESS THEY ARE UNDER OR WITHIN 10' �� —-- -- ---- �o �L _ 3 .o OF DRIVES OR PARKING. H-20 LOADING SHALL BE USED UNDER OR WITHIN 10' MIN. uoulo .r, - 10' OF DRIVES OR PARKING UNLESS NOTED. INV. EL. -s~t'g INV. EL. 3'T.Z S.A.S. 40' �o' Z 4. THE EXCAVATOR/CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL LONE x WIDE x _FFT. DEPTH INV, EL WITH S2 HIGH CA'ACITY INFILTRATOR CHAMBERS SITE UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. ----- - - - ____- 5. SEWER PIPES SHALL BE 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC LAID AT 0.02 SLOPE. - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE ___ �.z0'u DISTRIBUTION BOX 6. ANY MASONRY UNITS USED TO BRING COVERS TO GRADE SHALL BE 1500 GALLON PRECAST FEE =0`'CED CONCRETE SEPTIC TANF; MORTARED IN PLACE. 'INSTALL ON A LEVEL BASE MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION M ti .ER!ALS PER 310CMR 15.226(2? MINIMUM WAIL. THICKNESS 2" 7. FINISH GRADE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.02 FEET PER FOOT. TEES SHALL BE CONSTRUC D :)F SCHEDULE 40 PVC AND MINIMUM INSIDE DIMENSION a 12- ` SHALL EX i END A M;NIMUM )F A' ABOVE 1 HE FLOW UNE x OF THE" SEPTIC TANK ANC i£ CON THE CEHTERUNE OF THE OUTLET INVERTS SHALL BE EQUAL TO EACH SEPTIC TANK LOCATED DIP CTLY UNDER T'-IE CLEAN-OUT OTHER AND AT 2' MINIMUM BELOW INLET INVERT.SEPTIC MANHOLE. ,HE DISTRIBUTION UNES FROM THE DISTRIBUTION BOX TION iiAU_ 8E NO LASS 'HAN 2' NOR SHALL ALL HAVE EQUAL INVERTS AS DETERMINED BY FLOODING THE INLET PIPE ELEVA O MORE THAN 3" ABOVE THE NVEF.T E NO N1 OF THE THE DISTRIBUTION BOX TO THE HEIGHT OF THE DISTRIBUTION LINE INVER r AFTER ALL UNES HAVE BEEN SEALED IN PLACE. OUTLET PIPE. INVERT ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE BY FILUNG WITH DURABLE \ AND NON-DEFORMABLE MATERIAL PERMANENTLY FASTEND TO THE SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE NSTALLED LEVEL �ND TRUL ­0 GRADE UNE OR RECONSTRUCTING THE LINES UNTIL ALL INVERTS ARE OF x ON A LEVEL STABLE BA' THAT HAS BEEN MECHANICALLY EQUAL ELEVATION. 35.4' COMPACTED AND ON T( NHICH SIX INCHES OF CRUSHED STONE HAS BEEN PLACED TO 4SIIRE STAFIUTY AND TO PREVENT 41.5' SETTLINC, SEPTIC TANK SHALL AVE A 'AINIMIIM COVER OF 9'. THREE 20" MANHOLES WITH R•-ADILY R::MOVABLE IMPERMEABLE �0 �" S Xn COVERS OF DURABLE MATERIAL SHAL 9E PROVIDED *:TH ACCESS O 1, PORTS BEING PLACED AT THE CENTEF AND OVER TNT' INLET AND OUTLET TEES. THE OUTLET TEE SHALL 1 EUU'aPED HTH GAS BAFFLE. 303.006 aq.rt. X :,a•,. co x \ x N 39.9' 41.5' A \ 3x x — De)otes Exleting Spot Elevations, �B6 4, �• x 39.5' Proposed 1500 Gallon Tank / Proposed S.A.S. Proposed Dwelling Infiltrator Trench S /{ fig, 42.4' x � `�-z- REFERENCE MAP: ��St �9, ------ ----x 40.. SOIL. OBSERVAi,Y4 DATA: B+ - CAPE COD ; S.A.S. �pan8ion Area WATER TABLE CONTOURS A G , AND 0111 01- '--- TEST DATE- ZS Gq PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY jJ Q .�O 2' l -- --- WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS 6'� {� _ o SOIL EVALOATrJR SEPT'EMeER 1995 DESIGN DATA: - CIA WATER RESMIRCES OFFICE } �, B.O.H. AGENT T�.• ,_�s-ate CAPE COD COMMISS10N STRUCTURE �-�S., A W I S' x u; pole EXCAVATORYZ - _ TYPE NO. BEDROOMS GARBAGE DISPOSAL - A ?. .� 40 -- �T• PERC/RATE DESIGN FLOW q dam\ o A4� C 17 ZM 4 L-Crl.j �� I \ •' ,' ZONING W I BUILDING .SETBACKS: 'nil 4 10 yTZ 3 A Lo yR s 3 / 1 � I , FRONT 30' SIDE 1 SEPTIC TANK AAO � ZOO _ 8Q0 U V p REAR 15'OVERLAY DISTRICT: AP Z� G S/!o LEACHING FACILITY �.� \ ~ O ,'� ,' 1(� FEMA DATA: ZONE "C' �3 10 + �o � ��'`10� x Z = ZOO \ ` � �� .A• � II ASSESSORS DATA: MAP 22 - 95 REFERC _ yy Of u\ REFERENCE Ir DELAED: 2931/85 i Sao z-.'y ��A Map z . �B / �y �t1Aof G ! C• ( Sr+IJ,� (zoo �• 40� X �� �17� ��. G� ge, 39 I 1 / E , WILLIAM - I 40 4 LIEBERMAN ;,, 4 STEPHFN Z No 13911 T 1 1ZS 1 1 OII I 1 O ? / .'�' '� �o�1ST�P4'\�t47 � DOALE - 1 f GRAPHIC SCALE — ------ - (44 �" 20 a ,o to .o �\ ITS PLAN U �' LAND Exleting Pavement IN { ( IN FE /' t' C O TUIT BARNS TAB LF, MA -- I inch = 20 tt BM: TOP HYDRANT - DEPICTING THE PROPOSED EL 43.7' -- PLAN LDATUWI: NGVD ,i MACMIEI AN RESIDENCE /pole - ---------- --- Scale: Af; Shown Date: June 11, 1999 OPrepared By- Stephen J. Doyle and ARRocintep 42 Canterbury Lane, Fast Falmouth, Massachusetts 02536 Telephone: 508/540--2534