The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0045 SCHOOL STREET #00- i r - f Town of Barnstable Planning Department Staff Report Cotuit Post Office-Cotuit Federated Church - Appeal 2000-86 Modification of Special Permit 1958-15 and/or Special Permit Section 4-4.5.(2) Expansion of a Nonconforming Use Date: September 22, 2000 To: Zoning Board of Appeals Approved By: Jafekie E sten, Principal Planner Drafted By Art Traczyk, Principal Planner Petitioner: Trustees of The Cotuit Federated Church, Property Address:'- y45 School Street,Cotuit,MA - - Assessor's Map/Parcel, Map 035, Parcel 014 Zoning: RF- Residential F Zoning District Groundwater Overlay: AP Aquifer Protection District Filed:August 16,2000 Hearing:September 27,2000 Decision Due:December 21,2000 Background: The Trustees of The Cotuit Federated Church have requested a Modification of Special Permit 1958-15 and/or a Special Permit in accordance with Section 44.5.(2)for an expansion of a pre-existing non- conforming use. The subject of the appeal is the privately held US Cotuit Post Office building and site. That property is a 1.79 acre site located in the center of the village area of Cotuit at 45 School Street. The area is zoned RF Residential F Zoning District permitting only single-family dwellings. The structure and use has the benefit of a 1958 Special Permit No. 15 to permit a change from an elementary school building and use to a post office building and use. The property is presently developed with a one-story, 1,600 sq.ft. United States Post Office building and associated parking. The applicant seeks to retain the use and reconstruct a new one-story post office structure of 3,600 sq.ft., on- site parking for 33 vehicles, loading dock, a new Title V septic system and associated landscaping, lighting and site drainage. An approved site plan for the proposal entitled Site Plan of Land in Barnstable, MA prepared for Cotuit Post Office, School Street Cotuit, MA 02635"and dated 5-20-99 last revision date of 5-23- 00 has been submitted. The plan was approved with a restrictions by the Site Plan Review Committee on April 27, 2000. That restriction was that appropriate signage shall be provided indicating one way (inside the two way entrance). Staff Review: Although this is a US Postal Service office use, the site and building are privately owned and developed with a lease to the Postal Service. No Federal jurisdiction has been exercised and the use and structure must conform to local zoning, as in 1958. The applicant has requested two forms of relief, a Modification of Special Permit 1958-15 and/or a Special Permit pursuit to Section 44.5.(2) Expansion of a Nonconforming Use. 'When a non-conforming use special Town of Barnstable-Planning Department-Staff Report Cotuit Post Office-Cotuit Federated Church - Appeal 2000-86 Special Permit t permit exists for a site, staff usually recommends a modification of that early permit rather than seeking another non-conforming permit. The 1958 special permit found that a non-conforming use legally existed. It further allowed a change from a school to a post office. The use and building on the site thereafter operates under that 1958 special permit. Today, the applicant is requesting to demolishing the existing building and construction of a new building twice it size. Special Permit Findings: In addition to meeting all of the provisions of Section 3-1.1(3)(D), the granting of a Special Permit requires the following finding of facts to be made by the Board (as required under Section 5-3.3(2)): • That a site plan has been found approvable by the Site Plan Review Committee, • that the application falls within a category specifically excepted in the ordinance for a grant of a Special Permit, and, • that after evaluation of all the evidence presented, the proposal fulfills the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and would not represent a substantial detriment to the public good or the neighborhood affected. Suggested Conditions: If the Board should find to grant the relief requested, it may wish to consider the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed as shown on plans submitted entitled "Site Plan of Land in Barnstable, MA prepared for Cotuit Post Office, School Street Cotuit, MA 02635"and dated 5-20-99, last revision date of 5-23-00. 2. Appropriate signage shall be provided indicating one way (inside the two way entrance). 3. The locus shall comply with all applicable Building Codes,Town of Barnstable Board of Health and State Fire Prevention Regulations. 4. Signage shall conform to the sign provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. Lighting shall not exceed 16 feet in height and all luminaries shall be shielded from glare and direction only on the post office site. Attachments: Copies: Petitioner/Applicant 2 r � Town of Barnstable-Planning Department-Staff Report Cotuit Post Office-Cotuit Federated Church - Appeal 2000-86 tl Special Permit Copy of: Site Plan Review Meeting of April 27,2000 SPR 39-2000 Cotuit Post Office,School Street,Cotuit,(R035-014) Dan Ojala presented a brief proposal on behalf of the US Post Office(proposed long term tenant)and the Cotuit Federated Church, property owner. This application had been continued from 3/23/2000 and remanded for a revised plan. On this date, Mr. Ojala identified the improvements in green space, the elimination of two parking stalls and the relocation of one parking space to the rear of the site. Health advised that all prior issues appeared to be addressed. Planning also advised that the their issues appear to have been addressed. Conservation requested that silt fencing be included during construction in addition to the other protective measures typically used and indicated by the applicant. Engineering advised adding directional signage(painted arrows for one-way). The Building Commissioner sought confirmation that the federal government asserted jurisdiction regarding this project. The applicant indicated that this was true and a brief history was offered. The panel was informed that there was a public hearing in 1998 regarding this matter. In addition, the applicant advised that there were consultations with Town Councilor members including, Richard Clark about this project. Documentation substantiating federal assertion was required by the Building Commissioner. Subsequent discussion included curbing, handicap ramp, existing crosswalk, and a handicap curb cut. Conservation inquired as to the location of the temporary office during construction. The applicant responded that they intend to install three trailers to use on a yet to be determined site. Currently, they are discussing space in Cotuit by the former Friends Market. The applicant was advised that this proposal would also be subject to Site Plan Review. Conclusion:Approved with the following conditions: Appropriate signage shall be provided indicating one way(inside the two way entrance). The applicant shall provide appropriate documentation confirming their assertion of federal jurisdiction. 3 l . WE� THE ZONING RELIEF BEING SOti GIiT I?y - -^• ...• aT" SEEN DETERNIM BY TILE Z 'SI G • . +�� ' F ORCEMENT OFFICER -^ (, KAM g BE APPROPRIMTEEp TOWN OF BARNSTABLE jl� u Zoning Board of Appeals l6 16 Application for a Special Permit J I TM Of BARNSTABLE Date•Received For office t��ARD O.A APPEALS Town Clerk's Office: Appeal# d-0 " Hearing Date Decision Due The undersigned hereby applies to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a Special Permit, in the manner and for the reasons set forth below: Applicant Name: Trustees of The Cotuit Federated Church , Phone: (508) 428-6491 Applicant Address: 40 School Street, Cotuit, MA 02635 Property Location: 45 School Street, Cotuit, MA 02635 Property Owner: Trustees of The Cotuit Federated Church , Phone: (508) 428-6491 Address of Owner: 40 School Street, Cotuit, MA 02635 If applicant differs from owner, state nature of interest: Assessor's Map/Parcel Number: 35/14 Zoning District: RF Number of Years Owned: 42 Groundwater Overlay District: AP Alternatively,modification of Special Permit 1958-15, Section 5-3.2 Special Permit Requested: ZBA General Powers or: expansion of a pre-existing non-conforming llye, Cite Section & Title of the Zoning Ordinance Section4-4.5(2). Description of Activity/Reason for Request: Remove existing post office building built pursuant to Special Permit 1958-15 and replace with larger post office building as shown on the site plan, elevation plans, and floor plans filed herewith. Attach additional sheet if necessary Does the property have any existing Variance or Special Permit issued to it? Yes Permit No.: Special Permit 1958-15 I If the applicant differs from owner, the applicant will be required to submit one original notarized letter, copy of a proposed purchase&sales agreement or lease, or other documents with the application to prove standing and interest in the parcel or structure. _ q Application for a Special Permit-Page 2 Existing Level of Development of the Property-Number of Buildings: One Present Use(s):- United States Postal Service - Post Office Gross Floor Area: 1800 sq. ft. Proposed Gross Floor Area to be Added: 1800 sq. ft., Altered: sq. ft. Description of Construction Activity(if applicable): The existing post office will be razed and a new wood frame'single-story building will be built with asphalt shingle roof, red cedar clapboard siding and white aluminum windows and doors to house the Cotuit Post Office all in accordance with the plans filed herewith. Attach additional sheet and plans if necessary o be completed prior to applying to the Zoning Board of Appeals): Site Plan Review(required t p p 9i Site Plan Review Number: 39 - 2000 Date Approved: April 27, 2000 [ ]-Not Required -Single or.Two Family use Is the property located in a designated Historic District?..................................................... Yes [ ] No [ if yes [ ] -Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Date Approved (if applicable) [ ] -Hyannis Main Street Waterfront Historic District Date Approved (if applicable) Is the building a designated Historic Landmark?.................................................................. Yes [ ] No [)d Have you applied for a building permit?............................................................................... Yes [x] No [ ] Have you been refused a building permit?........................................................................... Yes [ ] No [A The following information must be submitted with the application at the time of filing, failure to do so may result in a denial of your request. • Three (3) copies of the completed application form, each with original signatures. • Three (3) copies of a certified property survey (plot plan) and one (1) reduced copy (8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17") showing the dimensions of the land, all wetlands, water bodies, surrounding roadways and the location of the existing improvements on the land. • Three (3) copies of a proposed site improvement plan and one (1) reduced copy (8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x rovable 17"), drawn by a certified professional and found a pp by the Site Plan Review Committee (if applicable). This plan must show the exact location of all proposed improvements and alterations on the land and to structures. See"Contents of Site Plan", Section 4-7.5 of the Zoning Ordinance, for detailed requirements. • The applicant may submit any additional supporting documents to assist the Board in making its determination. Signature: M1 Date: �� ? �q o epees gtativ 's i nature //pEf�l1J og J • sCt �f' g Representative's N-�' S CiJ � S �U. �� 6 U Phone: Address: /4/,9;N m T r1l A OZ b 01 Fax No.: �U�� 75 L(- 7 r IMPACTED cr LFM) CU�11%is ee DIED lue Lill (r nri/uni lasarr mciwUE � rss7nw sY1MiA' • UOOl r .. CURBING ll W&MAr sow ST.R ANr aosnrC wa'reals No slalB: Lel�s N S RBINO R-BOO.'0 CLWAM cJ >� ss SECTION 4Awr 00 1 ` _ :CIIZ U N► uNw o/ \ awr uro saw eprw- A CU�aO ` Stoll art m°•7 / ! s. J �r �9°1WgWr (im.) s'wisa raaomr U nJ INMe AAD Jt'A'/OfA PRO,ONAvo wfi aRc>� / \ Jaz ar xaor h 0xs' ' 'O y nnrcl� RlcLNvm .:�.;.' i V• � � Ja 'Jas�u�i AvanM a 'f tpR: C , `'a7r ►� La WALTER P. RAPP C E•am am 4 i� 'A►. 4� � �1 / C' rr• ;• \ far AM It JOHN S. SULGER ii-�r L lt�! � / KIT w /r w/F q(IlaN9 tea. IOd Yil •^ IVY Ot//JlC! AVOIAOSUI CAL ip-.V i \ JaJ-tp�trrCwEt1. Awr `t r Now 1ovv our • \ _�S ` S/D►1OrA rX N IMM s•slaarAllr SOWN/EMM:£MNun a YS 1 EmSTING mbw, IO'OEEP CESSPOOL /PPRO%OMTE LOCATION 1lEYTAAI[11!?RM17 O / AMV alLC/t!D OW \ NOrE. PROPOSED EROggy GavrM NEMNG s OV ALL SLA"ES G)PEA7ER \ '6 THAN 70X • BVK-e ,e� yP \ CHARLES L. ALGER BOA\ \ 3 �� • COORDINATE L.W4ER TYPE.SIZE .. AND LOCATION MTH MECHA NCAI.DESIGN 5 1 �I 1or-a' ' 20-C —f+r ——— ----------------III I b A.11 b LDuvER ,� - __ fTRI I DOORS/' 0 b MECHANICAL ,W nil fDR BOILAll ME 6•_1 11•-01/Y (SPEC 7 1 R ---- -- __� THE WALL —— —— 1, STORAGE I L ` - ' _ . 1r /Z 106 3•- 5' 0• -7 1 •-�I'-]Y f Aa 11ECESSED 6 A B MOP ^11' AA• 1 AN b 6 2 1 HYDRAULIC v, ilBfliGIASS REINFORCED PANEL SCISSORS uFr ON WALL MOUND SINK AND e I EE DETAILS ON b r-3 I/7 MIJMMINE ON WAILS AROUND SINK AM UP TO V Aif. 'IAWORu _ I T.A72 t9 WORK CASED O rc-/ 1 1 2 MAIL »'-r ROOM FROM F100R TO ^ ♦ It,s b I 2 y 1 I 113 TING UNIT Y S�A.F.F. 1'-91/1 1 AA3 1 SEE M1.2 :...11EN5 _ SELF - I TOIL T ® E M. b .EL _2 .O :..•, 11 ! I I�Z 102 1 ' COORDINATE R.O.REOUIREMENIS 1' a ! {.....• I N/LOOKER MANMIFACNRER 107 b ALUM.NAIL PIPS(IYP.OF 2) I i•_Ir 6'-C ! g_� 6•-�) - G �0' S•-C 6'-lT b 2 1 _- ---- g � n , 6 J/4" 2 O CONFIRM LOCATION OF ME PARTITION MTH ALT.NUMBER OF BOX SECTIONS FLOOR PLAN REGUTAR 00 DOOR W/,raNOPr 0 4. g• 16' _ 4 Al I ��•II �•M. .I • _Ors ATTIC RAN W/ 7 SECURITY BARSSmOwGL1:S � '�✓/ /� �—swrm VENT(TYP.) 6 DIA FLUE- v O -_TRUSS BRCS WALL MTD LIGHT FTKTURE (TYP.) f ELII'-5 I/2• GUTTER AND DOW1 MMU _ Wo. a�waaao. I TOP OF 1 i --•—EL 33� EL l 1 -- -- --------- -- L --A,J --A-----------L--•-------A---- ------ --.-.-� ---------� _ --------------------------- -----WOOD ---_----.-- W000 CLAPBOARD, TYP. WALL HYDRANT W/LOCK 2 SIDE ELEVAMON SCALE. 1/B• 0 4' B• 16' S ASt • _ 1 2 1 �I M1 M1 2 7 AM RIDG: SHINGLES (TYP.) --------- —-— 5 EL 19'-i TASK LIGHT , -- GUTTER AND OS. GUTTER AND DS —--_ '+3NG. _ 5 -- --•—•—T_RU55 BR( EL 10•-( TA 0 - ID TOP Of SU — — EL 0•- RN I SEE_DER: 3/C2.2 1 aE DETA 1 - ENTRY DOOR CRAPHKS 1 N HYDRANT W/ LOCK ---J10 A1_ PUSH[PULL---- -----------r - r----�-L-�r------- ----- - - - -• 1 ---L.-- -L-L--J----J..---------------L----CLAP-A----- 1 1 _ ••__ ---------------------- --------- MD. CLAPBOARD, TYP. _ L� -:!HEAD DOOR rL-L,- __- __--__---- --- ' RN3 SET OEf: 4/C2 2 y&0N UTES WD. CLAPBOARD, TYP. DOWNSPOUT SIDE ELEVATION 4• SCALE: I/R• = 1•-o' - I ATRC FAN rl/ SIGN TYPE RCR42 A21 SECURITY IAA NIL LOCATION FOR 1 ELECTRICAL _RR1 FLAG POLE LIGHT �S SIRNQES S . � SIRDI • TRUSS 9 EL - RS1 EL 1. t.: TOP OF SI EL W .._-.� L------------------- _�_ RN3 SEE DET:t/Ci.2 ii000 CIAPBOIROS.�' `I' RNI SEE OEr:l//CC2.22 ' - JIO-Al-PUSN/PUI.EMRY DOOR GwPMCS 1 FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1/I•• I'-7 0 4' /' 16' 1 HEATING UNT w/r Ow FLUE St' 6 1 t ASI 2 ATTIC FAN w/SECURITY BARS SANITARY IKEMT(lYP•) ALUM.WL UPS(IMP.OF 2) �S r.0.0.0 Er-C A.F.F. C 09L FLUE • TRlrss ERKG — �EL IIr-ir-----•— i: GUI y �------------`.. FRESH AR INTAKE___ L�_ ___ _�—— •. � _.—. .—. TE WITH LOUVER WK#I wAu MTO LIGHT FIXTURE REAR ELEVATION G) O 4' IF I G' Ij RIDGE • --.—.—.—.-EL STRUCTURAL BEAM ROOT'TRUSSES TRUSS WRING SECURITY MALL R CLG. .. - TOP OF SLAB RENT-A-EX)x UN115. s BUILDING SECTION n,, Kill I III f If y_�� Ll 9 aAllCl Cfl tz r lei do Cotuit Federaed Church M SCALE: =250' Map 035 Parcel 014 s *Kart» ?1Q* d, phy,oad *HM The parcel ib%=**Fq& OP Is' "It" DATA SDUR�Sc kko ks clam-made%OW rraeto�Pieled fmm 1995 wW Pv9Mk by The. �epelaeOa re�maet lrationd of pmpeAyboaodoees Trey oro aol tnalomeorts,cad W.Sardl Gom�ry TopoQa�yand ve4elolbowemltdaPiehd from 1989 need phabpmphs by6iOD ,i�ap Aoaaoq ats ata scale of do cat mprose#WW rolbiadapsto phood abjeds CaPoiatioo PlonimehiQ bmm*,mid aepOft Vila mopped tommWad Map Aram SW on do mop ato smle of 1'=100'. Pomal Iooswae domed 6oai 200DTowc of tlmt able Assessds tmcmaps. wa •619. ra( . TOWN OF BARNSTABLE PETITION FOR VARIANCE SPECIAL PERMIT UNDER THE ZONING BY-LAW To the Board of Appeals, Hyannis,Mass Date 91 1958 195_ The undersigned petitions the Board of Appeals to vary, in the manner and for the reasons hereinafter set forth, the application of the provisions of the zoning by-law to the following described premises. Applicant: 'COtuit Fsdwated %N3h ( Name) (Wlnter-Address) Owner: SaM (Fall Name) (Winter Address) Tenant (if any): (Fan Name) (Winter Address) 1. Location.of Premises _._ sek"l St,.(gesite 11LA stoh Cetait (Name of Street). (What section of Town) 2. Dimensions of lot 175' �._._2� ._ Area 36j 515 Montag) Mepth) (Square Feet) S. Zoning district in which promisee are located_RR 2 4. How long has owner had title to the above premiabat APP11 3he 1958 5. How many buildings ate now on the lott_Old 1-- admol house Much in to be 8. Give rise of existing buildings removed before F.O. is ��aiYt:Z93j, Proposed buildings = 31, _..._ 7. State present use of premises AbOdMIL selmol house 8. State proposed use of premises low Post Office_Building 9. (live extent-of proposed construction or alterations: Base old sebDel building. swat near goat office( 6t Z3lr). Pr pwo 2EhIng area for use of post offices cLWrft and yobUo. (use ittaohed sketch) ' 10. Number of living unite for which building is to be arranged _1e00 _ 11. Have you submitted plane for above to the Building Inspectort -- 12. Has he refused a permit No 18. What section of zoning by-law do you ask to be varied'I _ RD Z — &Ue •non-conforming use section. 14. State reasons for variance or special permit: _ E)-':'!��i91(liRt, o! a.jp in a building Mhioh is to be tors dM by the Tom.of Barn_sttb3s(motion of 19$8 Im tweeting). _- The Tort d"M the abandoned school. property to the Federated Church at the _ 1958 Toro meeting. The post office department has approved the location _ of the old sobool property for the erection of a am post office for the _ vil]age of Cotrit. Ohs citd.sens of Cotuit are raiaiftg 013#000 to build the post office. A large parking area Mill maws the post office# ehuroh# sad _ public. Cotai.t eLtisens feel_that_thie old sobool is suitable for United purr!" of a ublia Hat wee y� Respectfully submitted( C .._. Ifaa as t•ed C o �Tru�s teh eas (Signature) � _ irum) Petition received by (Address) .�Cotnt _ Hearing date set for 195._._. e Filing fee of$7.50 required with this petition. h a This form may also be used for Appeals (Over) TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Board of Appeals Petitioner Appeal No. 19 FACTS and DECISION. pow son"OWMI Petitioner filed petition on 19 , requestma a variance-permit for premises at Street, in the village of , adjoining premises of for.the purposd of OW4 Oft Oft, Oftft- Locua is presently zoned in - -- - Notice'o$.ihis hearing.was given by mail, postage prepaid, to all persons deemed affected and t . by publishmri ih Cape Cod Standard Times, a daily newspaper published in Town of Barnstable a copy of which'is.attached to the record of these proceedings filed with Town Clerk. A public hearing.by the .Board of Anneals of the Town -of Barnstable wgs he at the Ton Office Building, Hyi nis, Mass., at __-_ _._.A.M. P.M. .._ ._..- _ 19 , upon said petition under zoning by-laws. Present at the hearing were the following members: __....._.__....._._.._ Chairman -____ _- ..._.._......-.-_.......__. _ J �- At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board took said petition under advisement. A view of the locus was had by the Board. On 1911, the Board of Appeals found*. ' NNW Noma am" .. 00 OWN 101 lr ' � Restrictions imposed: Distribution:— Board of Appeals Town Clerk Town of Barnstable Applicant Persons interested Building Inspector Public Information By ..._................_................ ...._........ ..... . Board of Appeals Chairman 0 •mi�cRY tr ts+s1 �IlEs1r.ie of AtliO - . fiv YxA71 taalotLl o awe l UDNA ' . r S wA CURBING �Q�l STREE7, ��{ AIY 9171! ss S=o u'w _ .X= 1 .� am xxv Am fnpvaKA _ c ` _e � � sM•'4K artlnrJ S ;c 4ohri w / V PAMMO r / e ~ (Ma wipe r AAV Ir QAKR ovw Awr OwAvor w. ti Y �p'*tr. ♦ owe =r. r i r i ��• S► AN"O AERIErD if fAVIA m a r7 r A 41 s � ' i IA iAv�aeQv _ %''� �,�/� �4►hq : b `y iM\ a u WALTER P. RAPP cAoir co z�� as q w i w 7 h w ILI II ! APO dA� C � � w • x� _ ` � n•V' � � �p � x'xnrx��a X,w�veu, P +� •�� / �o � JOHN B. SULGER 'ter L R� �� / 10,Lm 1 am *-P // r*-"aCr2N� \ � x-7V F!C qA! .Mr A�JdA! !✓ � Or avrxar AVORUMA OU •. ��`� `. li rQ\ \ i •. 1 1 �QVI.E7Rl�A 1 \�/ A10vmv LQSIIMI OWN f*sR FQw spl9N Amw ww GA r wroTw io•oaP /AppBROwhyc LWATON off ic=Fxi[Afxww Mo ow • �w NOrC A?aOOSEV E7POS/aN CaVMat AEMNG aw Au SiaeES CREAM? \ w nrAN/oa - avn-e �9p ♦'• CHARLES L. ALGER t 16/2019 Car crashes into Cotuit post office-CapeCod.com C. 5 T -4- LAw OFI"ICE OF Will You Be Prepared; 010 James P. Dillon,Jr. Whenmerences Strike? _ 4th Of Atly^ Traffic Update Weather Upstate - o-' MASSHIRE t ! FIND click to A JOB Events view routes Click to viewY NEWS LIFESTYLE ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS PHOTOS CAPE WIDE NEWS ABOUT THE CAPE Search this website... Search I You are here:Home/Cape wide News/Car crashes into Cotuit post office * GET YOUR HANDS ON" i SOME E)QUGH 1 Car crashes into Cotuit post office I June 15,2019 Share this s Share S Tweet SaveQ Email S ±{More i , 1 Save a c 1 -I- I J1 i �' CNIIDCN S D�D.aDUC ' 1 fi I j CAPECORCOM POLL { COTUfT-A car crashed into the U.S.Post Office on School Street in Cotuit sometime after 5 PM Saturday afternoon.The driver of the Cadillac sedan,a 70-year=old woman was evaluated but When,if ever,do you think the Sagamore and declined transport to the hospital.There was extensive damage and a building inspector was Bourne Bridges will be replaced? requested to the scene.The crash is under investigation by Barnstable Police. 0 1 don't think it will happen I Photos by Cotuit Fire/CWN I Q You know,I'm just not sure I Q in the next 5 years E Q In the next 15 years 0 In the next 25 years Submit View results i https://www.capecod.com/cape-wide-news/car-crashes-into-cotuit-post-office/ 114 /16/2019 Car crashes into Cotuit post office-CapeCod.com are *k 3, rtanOK2 i s a� bUS E i aJ + 1 4 { I i r F nRealty oais GROUP' � C1VN Cape Wide News was created in 1998 by Provincetown native Tim Caldwell to MOST POPULAR ARTICLES tt provide public-safety,spot-news coverage on Cape Cod.This includes the negatives— ----- 7 of the Cape's Best Hiking Spots crimes,crashes and fires--but also positive events such as department promotions I and retirements,charity functions and any other activities involving police and fire departments and associated agencies. ; I 11 Top Spots for Cape Cod Iq Filed Under:Cape Wide News Tagged With:Barnstable,Cotuit Photography Heaven on Earth:The Best Cape ` Cod Beaches From The CapeCod.com NewsCenter Video of Orca Captured off Cape . Photo Gallery: Hyannis Car Show Marks Cod Quarter Century F i ' ek Cape Cods Outdoor Dining Picks for Summer I I c Audubon Intervenes to Protect Ocean X'M 2019Cape Cod 4th ofJuly Fireworks Monument for Puffins ; and Parade Schedule f Ikk- i t 5 Years Later:Memories of the Mill Hill Club i 'Medicare for All'Plan Faces Steep Hurdles in Massachusetts �. I t '— finding Dimes:What Does It Mean? i .,r f i i https://www.capecod.com/cape-wide-news/car-crashes-into-cotuit-post-office/ 2/4 Address: j . Pemutk. vlle. LARGE ROLLED PLANS ARE IN BOX /os FOR ARCHIVING. .• OfJ Assessor's map and lot number � I �r --'�'''''`� 12 Sewage Permit number .........�!. ?4:.....L..+>'/tr_Alt....ttA:,.+i .ca.:r =-.TOWN OF BARNSTABLE I BABBSTABLE, i "6 d' BUILDING INSPECTOR . QED MPY APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ..:.......,...:.....................~...,..............,..................................................................... TYPEOF CONSTRUCTION WO �— .4 k.". ''r �`�r.............................................................................. ................. .............. r - - "+ ......................................... . TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned hereby applies for a permit according to the following information: Location ..................-J ,....Sx. _. .. ? .......... .f:.:z a" . ...................................................................... ProposedUse ............?%.�`;m... „' ,E"Q ' '.................................................................................................................... • . f y Zoning District ....... r Fire District ... .......... =............................................. Name of Ownert...r1T�!J!..+.. 'r=�Z /'xAT t f 1I(� ►/Address ...... .. 4f-n1-;..:S.t-P .!..:r......�, f-AT ( 4T r~ C ! hn/� Lfr1 77 A/ -1,,�F��Ifan I' l/1f) f " Name of Builder ��-��!�.-.- ....,.. ...,... .......Address ...... Nameof Architect .......................".........................................Address .................................................................................... Number of Rooms ........... ...................................................:Foundation ,..(A,;YJ CJF, :.%.. ''................ Exterior ,.. /'a=�� rta... C' e,/rr�r,/<tr'. ...Roofing �, /. !4�.?.... 1�1�� /Ilr ..�. ............ Floors ................................Interior ............................................. Heating ..... ,IIP:I....�-.�l �'.....• !,S ......::.........Plumbing ....... .................................................................... Fireplace .................... ......................................................Approximate Cost R 670 Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board --------------------------------19--------. Area ..... . . .....`................... Diagram of Lot and Building with Dimensions Feek It . SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF BOARD OF HEALTH �V • � 13U � �`E�I I hereby agree to conform to all the Rules and Regulations of the Town of Barnstable regarding the above construction. Name' .- "'#7/i :..�. / f l>vara:.!u .................. Cotuit Federated Ch rch &=35-I4 / . � No ..... Permit for ......add..b}..Post _.. ^ ~ ° . ~ . O - � ..................... ...................... Location ...T`~. . Street_______.. - COtuit .---.------------.---------. . . Owner ..........Cotuit.]7 ..Cbnrcb__ . . Type of Construction ----��?��------ ' ......................... ..................................................... . . . . - Pku ------.--_ . Lot _______........... ' � - . ' . � November 24 78 ' PermitGron�eJ .�--.—.--------.l9 . � . - Date of Inspection ------------l9 ` Dote Completed ...................................... . . ' - .PERMIT REFUSED REFUSED . ` . lQ � ----..----~---.-------. , . � —�...-- ------------.--.. —.. .--....."..`]~��—'`Y.'�..��`-------.. ' ' � ' . . .............................—.....~ ................... . . --'--''�' . ' Approved ,---------------` YA . ^ . . --------------':^^^--^'~—^^--'' . ' -----------------.~..----.... � � t r TOWN OF BARNSTABLE SIGN PERMIT a' ' PARCEL ID 035 014 GEOBASE ID 2049 ADDRESS 45 SCHOOL STREET PHONE COTUIT ZIP - LOT BLOCK LOT SIZE DBA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CT PERMIT 58837 DESCRIPTION US POST OFFICE - 8 SQ FT PERMIT TYPE BSIGN TITLE SIGN PERMIT CONTRACTORS: Department of Health Safety ARCHITECTS: P � Y r and Environmental Services TQTAL FEES: $25.00 BOND $.00 drIm CONSTRUCTION COSTS $.00 I 753 MISC. NOT CODED ELSEWHERE BA STABLE, # MA83. 1639. Ep 6 MICI t BUILDIN : DIV,IS- ON K BYE�/�/��/%�•l,�/C.t-�l DATE ISSUED 02/01/2002 EXPIRATION DATE i TheTown of Barnstable Department of • anxxszABLE. • p Health, Safety and Environmental SerVlchs 91659. �0 Building Division �ArFc Ma's°i 367 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Office: 508-8624038 Ralph Crossen Fax: 508-790-6230 Building Commissioner Tax Collector Treasurer -Application for Sign Permit Applicant:- � �x a•� Assessors No. AMP 03� , f'yno�09/y Doing Business As: Telephone No.S O ff(l /'0� Sign Location ' / Street/Road: led� G Zoning District: Old Kings Highway? Yes/l 1� Hyannis Historic District? Yes& Property Owner Name: 7hy5TPd n�- T/,� Telephone: Address: Y5- SC/1ogl/ s�` , Village: ��/��/ �_-ZG 3d Sign Contractor Name: 4�ly�n�tir Telephone: -5-o, -990-/70/ Address: �d0 lUDr/ll ST Village: -l/PZv 6 22 fa/!`Y 1W Oa 7Yd Description Please draw a diagram of lot showing location of buildings and existing signs with dimensions, location and size of the new sign. This should be drawn on the reverse side of this application. See 14�Cllzl g� d- Is the sign to be electrified. Yes/(9) (Note.Ifyes, a wlr�ngpernutlsrequired) I hereby certify that I am the owner or that I have the authority of the owner to make this application, that the information is correct and that the use and construction shall conform to the provisions of Section 4-3 of the Town of Barnstable Zoning Ordinance. Signature of Owner/Authorized Agent: Date: /— 2 Size: l x y s4 Ft Permit Fee:- c- Sign Permit was approved: Disapproved: Signature of BuildingO cial: Date: i Signl.doc rev.8/31/98 LSYS-111�1)SUK FSU Ig�i)(il „ Y 12 gsl li: IM ty5liil itb5 na.{ i WTAYIAR Inc. r+� ARCMECI"S ENGINEERS PLANNERS POST OFFICE Box 3M I FA WASKNGTON STREET NORWOU, VA OY081 PHONE (781) M-6223 FAx: 1 878-8920 \ A/E PROJECT NO.: 9B077.00 It Aff PROPOSED i '' coal- G0 1 + + I I BUILDING K MAY 27 r I \ wr n�a rat v tl 24 { / to 34 , 32 31 , 128 9P If Uys PAra w \ 1 !figgirimcn � 1 Post-It"brand fax transmittal memo 7671 or page: .w r To From Co. Co. Dept. Ph no a „ Fax k Fax A GRAPHIC SCALE an am low NEW, BLUDIN•G I)= officE o >. TED S UNI TATES I.., ' i Cd U � O iii -7POST OFFICE . a w F F SMALL STANDARD BUILDING DESIGNS COTUIT, MA 02635 PLAN 30 SMALL STANDARD BUILDING DESIGN (SSDD( ' DESIGN OPTIONS SELECTION FORM 10:51 t PET SOUA ' w , z FOOTAGE, eLAno 3.04 SOFT.ioadOl'UTPOP61 am SOFT. - t P.OPIOSS SOIMPE FOOTAGE X030 80FL R SITE ®6 I CONCRETE WALKS 4124SOFT. �tAN]SGVE z;6sae 90 o m..w - 0.PAI6RO AND MANEINER O 2L631 V• O 6•aecR - A6FOTAL4NETT Q080Ff. X Cal A GROSS BLlDNO 7PTM) 600 BOFf. m " TOTAL 911E AIEA 6t00 80FT. I INe s INDEX OF DRAWINGSARCKFECTURAL TIT TIRE SNEET ti CL1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN - O'' C21 SITE DUALS-EXTERIOR eIDNAOE - , .. - IY p�• C22 STIE DUALS-L6CEL AIEOI6 _ _ All NK/fTECNVL FLOOR PLANS AID ROOF FLM AW �CS2IO FLAN - ABBREVIATIONS AZT SCHEDULES _ Al1 SILDO SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS "..1 EXTERIOR WALL SECIKI IS rt AuT nnt0 Raw wu.cRHx R a -2 EXTE"WALL SECTIONS wnN AAJ EXTEF"WALL SECTIONS.R ATOR61 i9 MAC An6nl fM6YpT—w N p wsw.rt 0v�t A/.4 EXTERM WALL SECTIONS Ba. w NRwo.mi ni aio - AIS PLATFOPRI WALL SECTIONS AS I M6pR ELEVATIONS n x/i aR w4� A61 ECTERCn DUALS-ROOF AND CCL1AN aNT6C aW[fp 462 DO DUALS O U9I O OETAl9 DO un mvn[ A60 Gi DETAEJ ai aiM •i MnX'R LT A6.1 PARTRIPERK N DUALS M910 w awtan un �T4No ror - .7. A6S N pETAE9-P.O BOXES, SBIVL7_FG.DFO di1 POCKET 00011 �. �uM RAsoni Rn6 noao . A66 NIgFOR DUALS-CELNG,WALKCFF MATS,PROTECTIVE BARRIER w�ic. atom •A. rta m A7.1 PO.BOX DUALS DRiNgyy N.oX w Sar - I v D NnnN A72 PISCELIA DUALS R W' A72 LASCHUNEOl90ETAL8 --- � Ilanlr w a6nTen nw PE11E9lG 1 ic. 6[ A BRA caww m'n. rtn 6 U m u urc. uTonc Runara D y PIT FIL143N0 FLOOR PLAN+DUALS O Sa.x TQWE TO(z P12 PLIABO FSER D"ANS+DUALS ii: 6 rvox Sw Sv0 ao[m M. OrwgR 9n. yrMSS SRlIL V G �gU!ACPL - q s.[ns ART KCKANCAL FLOOR PLAN ' mNRNa,(A arrA n. o K2 MECHANICAL EOUIF ENT SCHEDULES+DUALS RaNa mnrAiw C rn4T No wao6 ,�G S m. I A Ell e.EtTT6ru POW61 PLAN .E12 ELECTRICAL LICH N0 PLAN nvm.nc � rco w 6 a EO ELECTRICAL SECURITY PLANmmn ` :D a ELA L6CH IS S NO IA/EO OIAOFI DUALS �w i s --N.. xni { ,�� S E iu. aa[wnlw � ram m.mnaR n[ (n a n n.[6 N nR6 •x RWL RRn[Wn 4`. .. ---- -=- — aa. .tt w t�rd.r.r .� r�O\! �/ u i io a t�o.a r � - .i �1_ _ I� .. " •,_, a� _ EF F� ;YP� � aY Irn°ir�-¢.�i ti --�1 /w.l • d i °�� ' .� (Ej Q iv: vj- O ------ -- --- us �nut�,xu.out ran 4 �- - - , • . . tan vxra -_. w IT, ° ' ENLARGED PLAN - •_ r - • -- I M Hmmarivu or - > 051 ROOF PLAN w r • C w N a I >•I r 1 ua-orr wt - —a .av sa -LJ -.'._!'r_a�•_�/z�.v�•� Ix/.a.a . I I 'FLOOR PLAN LEGEND a° - ..,a>� T °�;.�:�,x�x°�nx • rp�.;�-�d t;��: Q, aas w awsc CJ o0 .. :-t m r•• � Q� I �)� ,' 4i lvwaa rta rm¢ z m ":i ; n® I � I g� 'I -- •\ i w..t tnwi � ewvm s¢ar _ . �� .I iT�°l •.i wcrsrtx Irvnaw<xrs I rwc Iw i� rtxm nttunxur` - t lJ® -s G) 4" i Q Ll '- I m ir°°x roux veo-u I` �+mu. vain .i rw.�rt.lx Irns-. 'O c `!w,w.wt rw.s trc^a:)! _ I ..tr_¢ a••o I')Ir! sr�'1 e¢ ;¢J!r� r-¢ v ¢ a NOTES z - � a luso-a. awnnx a srtn aaass x- 0' Q Q° xort°s•r..vr.n w.a ec°tKr ea R,o `TE _ fa9m wl$1SrQ.,Me tp rr¢a< e:au uom was w[e uuis ollaxn¢ en a n E . xatm - >nron°I«ac Inxi i<aa o°°Is� .••1e•,�, �. FLOOR PLAN Qalelc.Itoxwsx.ro iva ��• _ r � o e ,a .�•,�W `;: It,. �. — t CASEWORK CONVERSION TABLE Y �G v.� k7 E-� .. C C. W ... ....... ... ...... ,.. ..... ... fie: ....-. ..... .. .. �.. -..: ...... .. .. . .::,�.. slate add s..:.o':.rm::•w:rak Is m.ur m G.. .:: i PSlW Poch 5er•<A.w.mpaeLr a f� - ... ••. and iela4l:o. (npwea) `. : ... x acv-ro:tia<w r,md.i wr:w♦...mete ma�la.s woa:n.w.ata. ... _ ow IL w«ad ur..ds w,d I>er m _ A. _ G I .z.d �m U - u_ Q_ _� _ I i - • _ °•RXTURE PLAN LEGEND . w _ Q ma ro mwcsoamic a ' �xnrtn.sRorralux c �o • cw1 mn aaloai==omanca h z c s PFfOCx l� � 'd u x- - NOTES E)t E RXTURE PLAN a r. mm m,wo.onuu�. o . e� Ic Ia..omaai K o C'� 0. ` - REFLECTEDF- .. ., CEILING PLAN LEGEND m� r> I 051 i JI I: P I al ! T— a 1. i pq ® ®'.� p o P C 0 � I u `apF i. I 0 II 0 . •.._ - � a�+ao am'mm r�rcwcal�� I is o III c .-e.I< _<.evw spa..117 lit nM wa Ox SOrMs a I'P O,C ,o J � �® AFRf f(NS[x ' � R(llan 4GSRP \SECUWY CEILING PLAN `REFLECTED CEILING PLAN v o 0 P' _ 0 a 16 f j * ' -I Y.a'915rtP0(0 efOII5lrti Qna0 <'�•'� m coo r - ^ i i ! � Y?95rtWD eCWalt4 QINC � F .._..__YOlela all Ox mm V7 O mmor..rt Purmn Pn,mllol a orruv:a v o rP aoartPs.ml rawer awl. o �i ' z Hs P. DOOR SCHEDULE _ _ _ � Ewer iro pE,KiaE,rxl. xaairaar lexR. ,oo c . 4 Td J r 0 "Y.w 4ntt x/K.i sEE NI[a Bul YE N C x C M01 c YLiOt" ROOM FNISH SCHEDULE _ En- Td6 1.- j wut PYxp pWB - .. • z w[.I/f W rzMlx 000x BN Hs,autL 103 -. _ 4-1— --------------------- j IP4 AoBs anti i - (rnl .. C] Od rdI It, I I P4 I -6 1/re.1 V. RI6Mx[l Baw : U KJ _ b: E -is (n _ _ _ iNwtis BCxrwan Punt w is r-P Yf SRLs. � IbI �. xu M,rpld ITS • • • - - _i ." /KJ )/K, O.txwN poaB ➢-4 - li/n0J x/n 4va'rottl pow !�s .) pWB SBra¢[rw.V41Krxl fwsx vawwlMw ri/KJ Ii/Kl x(n swot RNKty rein OoOx • - - •. i./u::C'I ro ffuID Nx xwrKMYt wCMu[wxD EEBM1K sfuv� pA➢N wM YNeh i¢u - � ♦. Y[¢rw BOaa ue iRwl[welt Ib091. " b I J b " 4E IDFn tw I 0.nr,Ex,al rM 9ai rp S.w5,WSrtN w'LWlip ww6FBLLmc N1IPAVCY' f sCC C.T_G i ' : . '. M rm a>K sal ro mcsriK om[r. fscxE—ouEC r - b_ nII bI �Ex/�•.n-plt[w��[.p. Oz k E�E"�Z �xx�Ewnt!Y .. •, ---JIB bl .. a i E I w,5,we xrzvwn xuls w/cwKwl IxsEnrs xt 4NRIS OOwx Y[SR Ni T. �stxEwu.li ; I I ryi mr] wrs wC ulUxE Mu[RK 8U.aaD w/awiLroK xXFIS nq 1rmnK•,it®nn xanw uI � �56 . K Plewwf Ewtx[r5•m¢Ylan I " � siurwN.v¢nL wul MSC.1i1,'CwwiE GUY �' 0 �. Q Nxa./iSB.uwhuxn T v n ur w . r� FLAA I , Nrt:we.,u wuisoN x Em m m pRwcs cc I .wvsrNxc.w[,ulx xl r5/Ir wan auc «�. ti1 - - M1xG rxx sEWah Nx pu a.®Ex Isom W— P i sxEBwx wuwxs.nwle,..'lnxxc 5'ivnow O .. O O � , mPJ a«:n�5/.-aw•PEmnic rmc Y x rein - _ _ wsa•P wfwxCs Y Pu Y 6-P - MI Bl/8(wrs.ISwu,i.'Wnla CPwY - W J'-T Z• EE � ]� f sf[_z � � Y - inr t¢aln U N '15C Euul I T (' '�- � b„ t I e C¢v+Sw,IL rY.1Y Nsvlrsi¢n.Iwa0.-pxK [y . �O� I � � ` I " �3_I CBasSN¢L T Y wg5x[U.1K,p.• nC aNY [y W M ra i (m lyf ) roil /JMr,roiC,wRAK Rx,uiro IYrIZ.Is ,.nLUC GREY armor / K'rIRKx aYY F b aka _� mtir f.. •b�I li. I a R-ixn.iwo/s i-r rwrsx.•s.lox[r xxlrr ,wiw,mnwx o "DT / eVwPrb eluf !N5'rK�uC Z 0 ��II x.OuO[eWm PBp" 0.5 xm z,N= e� u rl - a rmurfs siun rorow.ncn Sxso-+s. - u•PwoPan rz1EDSPErnM`iunw semv w,w rc¢Pr.nlc.0 ,wE III.unrn ,R tQ„ o � F lac O © r f1ETA�STANDARD DESKM- ` • DOOR FRAME TYPES LOUVER TYPES^ WINDOW TYPES - 4" PROTOTYPE ca.aR AND MATERIAL LISTc2-s- e Sa,E 0 Y v !' 1' p T - x' xmE] t i N,C 6 Nrt 6 MiE 0 waxBOW SIpF. � b Y I b1 Nre n w xn a /� z o t xorz• T J iml«i �//�lWm •W Nrt Ip r -N¢Ip xorz a '.. i'I lF, r` re I soE wax` _ ' ! 50C SVY " rul a�izm ri uan Rasari'�ai pooa w/cr opens .Kar paw ^'E« I[s rC �Eamn smE '.� I. ' - - n_ wK n poox (1wK¢EI�'` .•.O � F � k; vsw-rat.d [ _. uma: sroxawaEiwxE.%l�iu""uriwu r I us�.l•_ 7--�N _— i �IP�i✓r,swroY SKEMWK"Smx�tlu [ lr� U -. 5/�14 BUN iuP EIOrt 9D[ ru•• E F aw.t iPo�Pa�Pxona Wx>/r• NmCe .�_ t� ��+� � I I I i •'c'P�r'.vcr"�s�«c:nnErf[w ea°°°v"oc Nrt r / .. z -" a ie Eaa xoN Raw ' NrE s-" PxPO"w°fon m°"°0p "i0 "�. rwlvl sxEEr Ko mas sriE 1 maEw wxw wee aP R Rp m.x,w B�w�x x xpa„= x «[ P"E[ wtwui BI 5'-0 Brr*p iRn�`"NA0"wOB'i"s,u[xrosm,rax a men sm...[ a _ ]. 510��O�IO�prl(ru ants "sr ATIT 17 \=/sat[: /Y- PE'p«R Iwuars ww0 iw¢ C,Opw wrt. a E Si b JS aaxr IWYLi64Pr 5✓Cri' ,wtppCOtdtWOxM1Pru2reorRppnpr LYE Cnxs'miKnOx iriopE rpl0•ra LA4[ CrIUN PSwrM rAnlE PUrrwu artOxCN odw vwwl Y 0.u[ iE S tW -iwra pE p0a1 iN�mot I�Ov LK�[. -W< n"Et 0.�6 N xOr�tMiEKp[gw�"x�a R[PiglC K40.s'd ur.ttP. . CVL rCPlL.MIEs 9.Yml`�aii OI`ee0a'/'CPEU a.nENn u 6 Pil•Jnar IK.ii ppii SW M sENNfn f01IgYl SiaC.ar . DOORS AND HARDWARE- .ffm.rPYKs Yen w,ro."m, a"`tr'a'ri0x5. DOORS AND HARDWARE- r r nr nP Rr.EEx iR Iro c ixxiz- IR eonw aE eJ w axnuEu TxE�xE wn,[ oow l!g mn Bwec macxwa nes a o ELEVATaN •TYPICAL DOOR TYPES O2-7-2 e•x YE sRerurlws ra•pPE roxwnnox 6 ELEVATKKJS AND OETALS•WKXET DOOR C2-7-2 b• mix wx.RCxi"`r/zi e gi p' • ib r->wV /�••- �L•rlawYs-tanV — Jam— ¢KxxuR C3I KY EllVr�[IIxGL ' SIWErn wW/6 mxi[5(In'.) • " \m m \ \I _.—.J I.o. �`—wrtx.wo wmsvwl Vl no� �E1- :A w 3Y'P' _, xx5 sR mn.rc>.: L � .Ixo aureoao:Iro m>od¢A,rsmml.Iw: ... > ° �IV/I�uj IVY x cwl+a..• - Pu�liw'CS A'S IImIf Ci04iioUA � ., ., w4l MdVxl•/ltttl ' � •... �.-. '• .�•+ �-] txK _ `'./� FRONT�ELEVATIONM - 2 SfDE ELEVATION - .�x �qx/� _ Y E- w I/w-I'P SWf:I/YM1�=�-P mR°¢awLS�Br S�M�iCltwl°DM.�M[n ---_\ �5- mveun Hm(m.) - - -.- a.'q-rA � � ti•'._tY o ol o: IDxu 4VBA -- - I d o ..: : ax un:is .I / Exlxr mwl aw.a o �x mx mlxP . a.................. . - - Im vAnl me I -�- . - � •� m.¢n,Iamn nr � rw sff m,rcxs - d�n"< 3 l REAR ELEVATION \ —wY¢x o¢P IYME - oar r�I/r .l-P "'° u�'H°""°,xl;"x.�f40u«salx 4 SIDE,ELEVATION . Ie " 1 S m x� • .. y , - _ < I � mm me a�Tit , .� nwn°w ears 7: 5 BUILDING SECTION - 6 BUILDING SECTION , .. - Lj Iw I NmK IIn•/T 4 1U[�x l e o a B , ... • _ ».. H � _ - - z_ _ aR Ir-5 I/r � 1 °M B.O ExEVixC51 T e � � U 0 _h} �'l Im/T Wlllt � t O O 'fie 1' z G m5 7 ENCLOSED PLATFORM SECTION rb`Y1 .IM.�•d C 40Q �x��.•� X^�aµB� I< e � � �1 CLECF— co a p w _ _. Ilm uoa mc�cS e F Or ❑ -_ - <n ro_�'-�I I� _ ❑ ®e = e:— ,� Gvlrt°�,wo oorxswu (n u — IOP Q SUB � .' x9.QMB:IIBa T➢. '� � ' _ -._ ro a vP maY w z O �a��o<r /L�a L �.aoo a.wBo••�Bs re. : -—ss-ra �`� ——— y F "aoxa�xcs--m sreu"rva.1q°('r;mrt'`ua -� .. ucv' •• .nx •. °� FRONT ELEVATION - � -; > " vro.rd 2 SIDE ELEVA m NP• TION a _ xmr-smra.wmc. Sun (tt,•.l , S .. e ar nuB e \ 4 e sr a lOd ` rL�i s'i rtx xm os- ji ' .-I i amx.xo oaraun �.a r-v— el mae<�wlo�ano°u"os _ _ I All mBv,.n xrwr ra.awevm,m f «rwwr / -'-wvyw+wmr�aam�Gx°B,.¢ a Pd --- ----------_._. ___ � ORAxUO Dam _ no♦ 3 REAR ELEVATION rr n;n+um ra°w80iP4 - xiu r¢m /c.: m nrowrQm. '..�BL x �eY YU,L I/P I•d rGrxe.BanRap,n�G� .- _ • e le scrc IK• .-P n ......: m+m straw ,' ._ I - 1 n• i ' Xawn I �_ �u.Pao .r - a�i=°ijr .• v la...c....r f t r ....,.r.; ..::aWI :•., ..:I I I k5 Y," � ^y,� mam ecwe,c ' Z�o � IaID OOS I p' 6 rr..P c 5 BUILDING SECTION - mxr.IK��d 6 BUILDING SECTION W Ila>Ma wr./r o.nu°�e Ie - _ .. "•K..�.-_.�—,d ,e - _ O �war nxmts ... mrss ecwxc _ a G.• _ -I larec wr r/r ar nu f r/2o I m• w.aw x u) NR u ( ' , ENCLOSED PLATFORM SECTION .••;� v1 a•^,$ - / SLVL IK '-P - 1. �^ .) � 1. / .1 / 17.�- /�-{��t.r•s(y�7'•h ��r -.s't�'�' .,. � �� _. {f�j,��- ... y ��, C a � 0 4) \ '� - uErl a'n '9 W 'u rx•K V m •a ate...,rP - - -. _ 2 �E ELEVAl701i - .. 14 m1 LL �~ . .• �I �I ll IH ~ ~..O O Cz] O Cn i�uo •�.Ym na1.wyr.n�:onc_-;l _ .ate - _ - .. 1.i a�9t n. ^o�m•.a+ no.roai nr. � I o(I �I - 4 soEAT10N �.a-�n,...w— c» 4 �C) o o cc tvCD -11 �✓ s CA r C. •mil C�7 Tam •' 1 I i � � 1+ � � _ _. �� iP H+ .O� "'C o- :s•:.r..MWiZjctL�ti:.- Oo IV a Ilz Ul - F-OT9Y .. .. .. t T co ..� --� • - t'- _ - 1'� �'� � _-__-- =cam--____�'` �:a��. � , - _ •i� f l � we�,r•i�r _` J —r. In y yC7yz F-+ _�' ., ' a1i�ti.-- _ wanes• �. �rn.w� �. I I 'Z.� Z 0 M Wn a __.__.__� ��n*7w •n�-.nnu ui n� � --boa - " - SCE ELe ATKkJ .cL-ur R,n`•`J. 1 .a ... _ 1�r. z� �. L$��$ f ° .� Ul x, o � ren ,o-r� - at�:;� I :.i�_ � -• i ` I _ � J I � I � 1 � �. c�� -- . o> .'TJ I . � �ICTJ. SECTY�N -v j 3 y• p . rj - <a -+o Z` n� E. 0-4 y W _. 'c a a - r —I; I/R rt L v o.xsLs /+r P.,•Ruv �s. I s rt /P xoof ti a rr Dv HnwLcx . e \ wsP L Ram-si R nS mS'Ui u xw v/vwox IHuSSE ROO umuss n",L Z -c. I.n L y l � (row w wrci e _ TN;S HFMixG M�! � TNSS 8(NIINL M� - r. Q I 1Yu __.1 DD fnYu 5/Y[D,0.nnxu I I- 11 �+ 50 fI SUHrhYTn /6 0.'rW000 - '0B0—IT /fix-J\ 1}`— uammYRu xc (xx[xi oecuwsl sane seE -%- ' p'IPRE oDR.+sI / I P .B s nscu . - ¢c a saEau ov'no�we"a•ST - a ttc a snlmum—fier/x - "so. Ircx)rscu 051 i - f moR 1 r . wRraRwn�wm - - 76�RR �T� �1 N wHMxw,HTDRLTRDxe.,M,Dx p/V6N T'w]WR 'AN.w xC O�CPRm[SSu�REe la/i[0 0 WD 16 oc T. rWe SRl XNLR D w t7 ' B/4/5 SCM➢4L0 _ 19 wSULnTOx Dn /5 SCNCgA[0 (y WN E w� - IYFl[u o.o Px ca yYumv I �.. (/j ILI Y. !COxC SVB� xI SDOLCD,.t.v f -I ' L I/Y 0.xw FR f [,.1♦ •' ♦♦f�P_ � ' - Q ITT O ' COx[n M F�6,6t0 �'90 wxW�f ) a'O R RRT /EVnIW RwwEx ',.1 PG.PpIC♦f!ix.R/r.NRC(hr.)-. - • (COurKRO xGWmnMV�L6c5C • -�1 I - :�(awrcrto cRnnDurt wsE .•/rrsmc(,rx.) �F ' 1f WDFNR�[R elSRunal: __I DOvc Vuxxnf m, - t f W MenRCILR wSUueYM. �, I - PMf.eNx - � a Nl�-� S-0 J O .. f!aaw5f rOLwa.Tgx ---1 � - N'Kalif fWxb,TOx ' '- 6'CORrK[D canV¢ - -H.-P- 6 CDurn[rto du�il e.6E K V U Nz '6 � �'�• IfT'IrJi rwxQL�i Dy_•SS[MDLY: �. I f . M�+'f ras •^LL ' /- .Qh - 1.•c,(toc ew fxoa wogR Ate � KfEe SxOw wOpR 10 DREaw cwl M1 V C I."ELs v i"ti kl is RL cor: aIT x Tirs c�oxoE`ro�Tmc r�. u.uoRF s�.e :roDLwc U � c»l;R D x—1 r E)/s Eww coM --�. y ::fs•� �Px fxosT LeP/,Ls RER Loco.Doa I.:1°; aR rRon au�iwn rrR Loco.caz - W L.lo w a fownLw ITr.I _w L w IOII a ax tm..l F �y o:c vl 6a v c- YE aLr•L 1/M.I rm Tw.Ions _ o '.,'_ �t x E E)lT6ilOR WALLS- EXTEROR WALLS- . 1 SECT ON•TYPICAL EXTEFLOR WALL S2-6-1 e 2 WALL SECDON AT wemow S2-6-I �� -Ts.-.lo+rss eo-eo r11 O ,.�G r4 m U F w cn 0. 14 EIS r 1xLD emEc�ir ra R'f.00D - •^`•••,.:;��:. msin mix�N IURt[BCn.[[ 4 - ' ,xln5F5 .r C- Q • Y - Raar 1Rv55.r R b N+rt msa.rbu w/NOR&RItRR � v (y Rn[s rw, � ` . (nvao m n6cq SEC�rt W " E.6 5nose o. i i5� mot scREWLE � wow mxeow rRm SE[LWIr[ERRL I � 00w'RLGiR I. ., - - _ ttG.t scxEelRFD 3/t PF1w000 oaR _ -- a°M Ifpq • - - - - _ ( siamzar�ooaR I � `. I l Rawiuw noR[rRour wnaww uxi aEIRE wK=ofr wi ` U �� r ao' ttRGF Ex1ERgR wui.TS[wm r• _ Polr[mYIE E VZNiR—6 w / /- • rl6u C N O . - :: R�aopRFmrDiiEiwwzeenom raw.nworpFo v a> _ riRr vin ox Cwo[—0°Fr E rE r-� /6 wmoR�¢n mmr ruLR r ,�EE4 rw mom. � A E!! 1 rM ♦P ) V,oY OrQ ,W Or e)~ I I 4WC w4xw. I r • v/E lrrR � � y I � o'-y Qp re lrrvJ 6 Slne.P0-1 i7 � I w or Sue a 1�. !1 iE'"'c, - . ,• ~ {1/2': M�i°Fu8[kNr�E`ut 2 r1 Of. wR.r 6 _� 'I pp' ;i muF rawn,nw.suumr {p io r if�riff ac�m t xtw uoia a0.1 .. ,( on RFu.R caxc.mo 0 Y O[ o. yco Ca TO o o !o z H; x= '_ goFun vm.�roR�.w°�F6 a oFR.R,/...�roR i.R.mores ^-'Fri-�=. EXTERK)R wAus- _ �. 1 EXi6i OR WALL AT VESTIBULE DOOR 12-8-I EXTERIOR WALLS- 'm> 2 SECTION AT BOX LOBBY DOOR S 2-6-1 i - o co 0 O O C N m 8� t:1:.a w00 µlac n.r[ I ,p 71 xan —lax ' _ _ _ _ __ �. .r. •r Y W I 4i. I — ., -Y r�"1 yyU'[" WrWSNEo title.QIDEa � - ._ a I 1'-0 I i.I I II II �yg en a. O z —IfD_4R'r _ w O F x w w rn I e f• ,<-- . STFELI. I —1 .000 axe xr rox"artr:uia .. qT`r wnmx.6axmw /j/ - 0x eatlra I?M x w s. Ea r I.I slxticr _ • - — — I i.6 Cm PiMRO N5x M O.TIaIVe WOIu .9__�_�41 1:eOI+ExIxo 1 1.otodc6c Ox�rl�.StfRro"BLwe ern aaa�x,�e,6E,axa, a,,:� �a- �x ,tl� a s 1 2 061 me,at scx[wE[0(rni = I I I roa0 CIAVBOum(axarm) I o 11 - o I I _ owwlr xu[c i.9e — I F� OOOx/S�SC1201REO ' I .1 l— 5fax6xOM _ I — — I I 6- I 1 I I PexiFD,/:�x rof oR.n[ of N£ - em Em row nux as¢la+ ,,s coxL U N I S. II II OEPREO6 A.B M TO pMC I tiro rsri nvixn O wrc. N SFNtD COxCx[lC vxeTO [o Cron pM(per ro wra 6 Ofr wl I I u 1 N N 1 uuuww reESx0.[0. 11 III I I_ .NOTE O O P •. �r S I PMraxurD Any ralfA ..' i mxt.euL Q.p ♦ 17" e iM Or Sub r 4 oa.� 1/Y OMA4o y I - 1p 1rl,rx rauxwrmx ti"�suoE r:.—ri o —ft - �;•u ,� �' �' ��,- �IiG'< : fin., I I -. � - l r ux[/.s Ivl law[n0E t'4 J PvtEo - h. 9 m Ioa � . r 10-_. �, ''— 1 r♦ i .. r0tlxwxw mvoxo17J .., t - a U. o� = w a 4 v c �= v . rwmrrt o-rcxsax rxrx.nu¢rarvrxr sx[crrwnw. p.,m `ve g is sa m.a,/x•.I rax re,carts 'I+c, F N0i o[r :O .7 Sb ` 6 se x[I/..I rax Ica wrn IRl � �Q n --PEE XTEPoOR WALLS- EXTEMOR WAILS- :��•"` 1 SECfgN,,TVESTO AE__�r 52-6-1e 2 SEs AT OOVERED RATFOHM r i .. ,". .._._. ......... ..., .- -.... . .. --. .. ...,...._.��._ ..-,... _ <... .. .. .....ter.....->x.�� _ ..._..... .. » A " 1 E t/nn.r F-r I rn an a°:."scr�° - . ` , I� ! , ,. ' rwxrm n/.•cox ter.w.tt c � //�\ 1 . . wuu n55CWLv 1 � vw5Rtl OnwxfL .•t • .. - _ - -_ .-- �o2rtwun cwncE oaon (9Emxo) - -'- - ww, . L V i �.99.�rWL�,��r,�><w9Lx sw.l �`?• ��? P �', - ,: ci - tarE: QCSOEruL Ir/M.�ra+nv.«offs `r ft. '2 1 Y n 6 1 L IXTHiIOR wAL1.,S- ^ WE N�.L SCE-C1gN AT COVERED R.AlFORU S - - BALL SECi%NJ�T COVERED PLA7FOf1M `52-6-1 �+� /�_lv)' o lC� xB.. u BBp B p rB x rw a B"�,E ni✓w�l cK O roc pigi y ,T J A / F _ I ro wwox vruxnw a - - r - �/K roux n • ' v yz a�k�t / 4'( F' ..,- — t ' •wTED sown Bcx+o.c xt.cp�> 051 ` MrwM/.• :Iml o -z I .k. .t — � a O Vl Q 7 sue ox c•,.oc♦sscxalr - _ ` z 0 0 �F . SSPfK rwxnnw ns¢un qq p - *mf nwsexc wsYueLr 1 r � — . f r* - � (L.t/}• 11vf SUB Ox oun[ 1 12 "per �+ —1 mroa rownaox•sssvnr(sr) r U - w arrwxarwx(rel U �- -� cn w aS 56 ENa 1/.H r!qt m:xOR3 s�[[�oRUL t/...r�pl Iw.-El (a/1 a n E%TERM WALLS- PLATFOf1M WALL- - '�„ 1 WALL SECTM AT LOADW.PLATFORM S2-6-Irv• 2 WALL SEC110N AT waacRooM S2-6-t h e..rv'a.wexe.t••a r r - - is ppLLLpp.pppp o m J>-RI • 'a I !m E ` I u F' F 'C.101�E301 El01 Cbl Cbl Cbl Cbl WI fbl (bl [bt Cbl [bl rbl E]01 (]01 Cbl Ebl E]01 (XO - „ - _ ,. b � W Q ' ��_J i I \-BUZZ HO U•t UI• J n RENT -BOXRENT-A-BOX-A - ♦ x_ O WHfT1NG DESK I/f.L-p 85 - I I ., (kW tl0•IN 1 n _ o- OONN-SEE 10 A _ _ .• • _ �uLra ] I j.j.-B - r�^• 1 J E112 7' Y- �[ ` OPB1 �Et! JI]h .� JI AI J t-n, � , IIYIURFS / \ / L - b C•1•-L/ /C 1 \'.0 C•1I - . .. \ '. . \ / •/I Ebl - � CAI CI01 C}01 \\/ c I _ I a C150 -I - .. NYO(O OHMASS,iK. I a / ,, `SELF SERVICE/FULL SERVICE COUNTERS(M y ~ �� OFFICE/R1LL SERVICE/LOBBY - ��SCREENLME `y -YHE:1/f.I'd J SLYL W-I'd pay • c - 0. 0 Y • R .. A `/ o r r W N . Pic10WA1-YL t}/A].!- PKTOOPMH-m 11/A].!- .. r '• �,�6 Jx-B RCCE rOL01NG PL GRILLE N110 DOOR OPCRAIpi • '.r-�- - v - iRWQA4 RCIMORCCO PN41 a O S OR - PANI.MO t0 YAILRI PKt00WPll V O. 1' 0. _ •. 4. 1 .. � PIPCR rOw[L R06PFN4R/ ,d a N F ' _ ' I I f I �I Tl—. I � - I - aue Bw-sE s/ws(r+s.) sluam slEn InAu[MP I I nW LJ —_ " L �o NIf0 000R OFCRVOR P1151E'IAIC I IK - - T 1 ' . _ .. [510 _ � S _ CALL BUYISR � - n L IOP Or IAVAtORY � RnLwR nu - t � vialem[a uvAlartr U ' , FROM WALL WORKROOM REAR WALLREAR WALL h o r . e - R r . r o r • " e � ..� rRuxp.•ss RENranvo PAISL - ox II¢Yn Y.LI w to f-o -77 _ 4 b t[RA:; IIL,RR WJf PAIN00 P-1 � Vl,U N I! PANIm I(iN.BP/4R1 AS R[OWBO a d p Yw/RROOY ItOlp(R .... a WOMEN'S TOILET TYP.SIDE WALL n JANROR CLOSETZ3 •. 10 SrAlt 1/r.t'-P �� 5[/tL I/f.1'd I/!-1'd I - .......... ------- 0 S • p 0 T • C 0 T • y.F _ o z 0 m w .. owr rux-caox ro u.ror rw'vz• "rRuss f— ♦ PRCfw nR'D m.r/SCN.SPn - .� i ]ti a0RR 1 w Cn r�w e n mE« u V a s / rnErwrswf0032u \ E- w.EO =—.O•m SOrm -SOrlrr COLOR 10 �� em rti.n. 1 �-P wttx"resew "° - `� -P wLOR ro wrw r.sn.. •/` - —Roor,RwssE: _ _ F o n w a wj f - .s=< ' RDOF RooF 1 RODF — — ALSOFRTATTHEPLATFORM 52-6-2'a1aI 2 TYPICAL SOFRT 52-6-2 av1 3 TYPICAL-RAKE DETAIL 52-6-2 by 4 NOT USED_ ,1brre..nre..ucr<-bw -K F.-.:ll'-tea L� ew+�sz<:...w hY'vz ..._LI—LI—I '0..,re...,s:•aa.o-e 0:51 QL w nwsrrc +" - ' esw•ir cuam .. •. r i- JRRf ew awe w ul 0 lo _ Tau 1 NOT USED. - �, - - V VALLEY FLASFTB'1O S2-6-2 d• 7 NOT ISED. - - PEN TKNJIIFLASHRJG -rT♦� S2-6-2I- f .rre...n eue.e Fvz _ A/ir e R¢aR ROR 1 S AS YMpALO- 1 -` i A o l - 6r,�w�a"�rR10ur�m _ n = - F rn RRUR rwuE � Q a- . .e•ooR snro iy� F r s ( S 11 ExTErnoR WALLS- EKTERKNl WALLS- a 9 NOT USED - - 10 _NOT ISED I PLAN DUAL•EMFIANCE ODOR S2-6-1 LN• 12 POF1C11 COLUMN PLAN DETA_ _ S 2-6-1'(v ra...,me..w ti..nra...re:sal.•-o C\l "CO - cn � - M Ft'A,—v of« . -s¢nmc�wx' - . " lE'i. .•. 1/� ;r � 1i xottR-s¢srrvcnaK . \ 1 1 �/ C Z R7 • sc xeo ro x000 i.nexer. �C] i o m ca> „ i Ld b xE�K... • .:nasrwxxc. E%TEf10R WALLS _ EXTERIOR WALLS- E%THiXJR ALLS .b 1 LOUVER HEAD DEfA0.. >- _ 52-6-I m•" 2 NOT USED_ P 3 IiEAO r. S2 6-f kr. ,bOFi@"ROM wHEAD AT PORCH S2-6-1k b�,R < x� .r� 4 — acxEx SCPCRr°"Lre n m.Gt mElneR.xwi - / `/ + • - �. 0.< r . vNrRUx u SCI�uEEa : / Rrnmx " _ _ K°wxw aroRrrRwr M« 11 \r \1 • — — aKwc Mfru � W v - sxw.s R�Rm Kwmw s°RErRoxr Mrt" � �F m srKwl cx Rao nom>rrtw — m.mrwaR xKE rsuxeEr - CO m o : a rvwE ruaw r.Y wm oR w°x.RK4E. - o: lrt oE.iott REsrsrxl srm s«w u REwuo F rn .. arm.r o.a wE .ro cuzwc M _ su�wr 0 a r.r cur srKx scx>:cuico .acxm Roo _ - �oo xuo wE Prnnrnx a rwswc euo r a Eviwuos srzn fnlRxc. _ efc«ER aoo uro srw+.r 000R a.wow rx.xc C.o 5 EXTEMR WALLS- /` EXTERK R WALLS- OO LOUVER JAMB -52-6-to STOREFFlONT JAMB _-�._. S2-6-t LV p NOT USED '1k..nrdwraxo.w:a. / � r�ay.rw C +o 'Z M teeL REMiwnWE y rmxv� azu<zrsrtx �'Rx I t i`arKR LK rwWa uwuu arwEf«wt Mnu Prm IE •��i00 Stt` �r .wpOr clout x _ - c1µQEx iR R i Swua '- - SC'w KUuwuu rMUCa &axER Rw Mlp YKiwl YNANr f BKx[R P°° _ — U — I Wrhx lRrwE fwrsx afM aLL _ /— .Wwr A W.CxER Reo oEci•oRx---------- _ SNu —D W r voR BE—. - 'RcrrR""w`x000 x - I P.n,n,w ns saEauuo 1 •..o°o ` - )I SEE DET 11 • 0 L c rrr - 6 a oREmaxl ssnx mEam xru rr c o EXTEFGOR WALLS_ - DOORS AND lIARD1VARE- EXTERK%1 WALLS- -.p,�,,. -U7 a v, r9T, LOUVER SLL 32-6-1 10 DEfAR3•ALUMRAAA STOREFi1ONf wumays G2-7-2 a1 11 sroR�ROrlr Sal x . S2-6-1mV 12 _ NOT USED " 6 a ^f .. .. "` * •. • i. '- Ili mrrw a s,xwrxR Wnw a e,NmTw� — _ c - amw a smWrvH �.rf En a//;Da r a rt CQ . aaxc rs snaax cues H zou x 9as ° u sM WriD mur smEs - F E-F > �_ �eu�'nm axiNCNEpS HDwaD W .. ,c•�:: �. _ - I I _ rn+c,H saaaacD ww 5e[s `� A- SG[di[D a. zmru e�5¢(p�il W C[uC A'srw �— / BLOB r/� �ab ox awML H HauHO CZWi 7 . I' I r.or a xxiDUD. rwsx a sonoara .. : _ _ s/xrrt unw wm 9¢: a I' / .—}.6 wW 17 6 D.c. I--I .r woo SrWS•6 O.C. 1,— �'-- 0.iv.K SQQouw roDr 5¢5. _ —�6\4 o W x 9M5 u wIN , .t rS SL�[nAED Wnl gas v wv URM vwnrgN ro M uw[NS¢a M wa IL2sixnr w uN a _ rrrro-m.5 RYrom Ywett aLSG _ MERIOFt PARiR10NS `. NiEFLOR PARITIK7N5- N(EPoOR PAfT(fiIONS ,, 1 TYPE D4(FiA-L HEIGHT STUD) G 2-7-1 cW 2 TYPE DS(RAL FiEIGFfT SM7) G 2-7-i d5 r] TYPE F4 CHASE WALL) G 2-7-,f4 xreaoR PARrrrlors- �- w/•+.xrx-r-me.D`uz+c�' 3' 4. TYPE J4( wnw a srHcru¢ wnw a war asNnr '� r wa.su9nr W. Naa ssENnr 0.1 . - aNlwl srwm WH flocs. lo°c In z� I l/f®RwuF 9a art r - _ ¢nwc,Le SwWxfO mrx,say - ¢uC.Le SaEuw xt♦5 mr¢aw wM 9o[S xa 4 Sn®u[0 WM SLLS - . � ax�awa6t.ny WHD - R SP[Mw¢uC ttSm[Y QeDD aiD W prrrSL.LS H¢aS0 ___ rx91 wN w¢wn[L 6 HmHp �sarow.D auw snm a sawuzD ra.c smw - rea srax ra nro W IM are U vs pta/c_oaE u�e_5pF xx�s/6 r a sarttNm K/u Dr cm.m.rolx vas I�z Dr cw.lo.WH 9as O a . - E.N wW$1W$•r o.0 i.r•ODD SNCS D r6 O.C." - • - i.s ww snos�r6 oc. suwN Wrx vas - . _ rsEHwzDWm ers H samum wlx mrs F OD Wxl O ux. a Wnr sm:s _ vuxi wn,mn a o s x . m�wmw Rwnaw�sEwer� E a«nsur a rH wa.ssr.n.•Isu a .. - - I z ate}F ,, _. PRERIOR PARf(RONS- s. .. - , - P1iEfIlOR PAF{IIIIONS- METEOR PARTITIONS- tfl6ilOR PARLfIION,S- . 5 TYPE JS STY G 2-7-,j5 6 TYPE L4,HOUR SECURITY UL Ng05 SnA C 2-7-,L4 7 TYPE N4 1 FOUR UL axws 62- -1 rx, $ TYPE NS 1 FLOUR(1L e(po5- G 2- /sr.W}-i- IVTwV /ax.w�aJ-4na 1Vi-rc /al+rya-i-wt �r.K ra /aYAO}} K-f0' a ` 9/6 Cv5e9•'YL mM) �t �� Two - - SCRflrS / . �eYiE GxR LAfBIWIQII.NrO murWm u Sarwi4E�0 RV r /'. R nCaSTmaOo� .LDS A}MRo vurrxuix x '��qqAA SROS ��.... 9DC Nl/aAd�� V •• .xr Wnx1UW m SEcemrt wNxrux // 6oa[D WiNLOW r z. m - SrNc9lr,vOD.CN[R wNH CoxxEClroN.'M c 1� I n FRN9arxRe.$, rS SCW'mlFO .... ,. ...�...,....." - .•m j;. rmc-r s/6 rnsw.Nu eowD '. >. Im. auwwc d � T ofolxl vzE�D- '-:. mu aN.xvwl.oxr ';t /r.r w9s,wrMmR vsx LDcx /\ )I I I U t �1 cwmvws zxD.L/rxE O c scwxr r•m BYx[N Nm.rm y � �'�D'Hilafaow xN}ro Hxa lrr[ SR[L rNAuw �K.6ralrt/StR nH SuxL mnr SN[9 a xun rqx, —�Sq®y1L0 f.r tonwm5 Cc all /at rxalro' _ F1Ner,R(.AEMI®1• ttvS .— yE �'\Lw SarEWLLD K IDICIXRm " c.r� z O Y wne'dic w� anm x wr vn uw.rt nrNq,gwL.0. E"vrc2 rzHu �E R.ws ion sanm eww rx�oµxa:ur NMtWA0.lirtF r w�°NErxrnwr+,`r°"SwLL wRx NxxfWx/�rviox.r NE xNiL 4e m F A I a %E 9 MEPoOR PARTMONS AR FV FDL NG SYSfEM2- FRE PROTECTION- FGIE PROTECTION- f/1 TYPICAL GYPSUM BOARD DETALS G 2-7-0 e 1Q DETAL•sEcuaTY WALL PENETRATION C 4-2-rz a 11 �GDETAIL•FIiE sMOICE P(3JETRATpNS c 4-s-o e 12 DETAIL•TYPIC/y q�DAWER - ca- b+rq+-i --- r�vbn/e+W. f�� '�- I I I I NWu�rle+wr-sdsa �..5.'.r�l I r r. Lo - M°xrco:ixwc ux"n surmm,rsio rwxE onlxixc wm s! xirc wui mxs�x°nnx cv r r-s �•_6 - - 5 er000°zaan a c rMOw.roi Kmmrrczr m la,ro sunixo m usys _ \ A-!"—"` +us�scE E mrrw a s,msna! mum nv.®m s,xurnm! - cuL..crmn�° stmwn wuL V Q ' 'f w ina rmrrc - 14 a Lmx,nnunc > uuao c..s sc,roulo wxc..rcu a.xiixnx niv— �� F Ems-•N 0. Smw E. S o°srlo av H,w°n lLr:��a+s) sEcvmn wKL sELva wu I _ p - .. '-a Ii I I 'i jI ow? all n at .lxS. I rx r KPr M 1 LW E _ - x.,r xssrweias �• r�J °C°P ITT i'P I uxrsmM ar o 0.O k. —E. REM-A-BO%- RENT-A-BO%- ��` SELF SHiVICE- SELF SERVICE- - � • SECi10N•PA.BOXES G 2-5-4 e2• —SECT;;N•PARCEL LOCKERS G 2-5-6 1,2 3 SECTION•SCALE CGUMEfl G 2-5-2 eh 4 4 SECTION•PCM-%25 A B OR PBSM-624 G 2-5-2 cl 2 -ice • m. re...rmsaLaa v:-ro °r�—LJ ! lmixo,o smBRw! �5„ >•t�loam !o�(usrs", _�,n :-P J/•- ,a,/r 0131 [n1 Mrslsw) A. - °a nn(usrslre"e) s Vr r-P Vr r-o iT ,•1,I ZV-1ram- � � . — m m(usrsTsxl 1 J/.• i_„J/.• ,J/r x x I - IL wmlxw = - n (6'°!of 0 T-P ki) I fiWxin wru + _ �r SCCUb,'r wuL M L.E a wNi BlYOxO-- MtY k,. L .xKxn4 — 'N El xuF iY R TE y l /fi0tt 0 � � iW.uiF E ss�I I I I o,erolrlwu,c Bsrs swwEo auw r Y 1 �� I ..ttaea - fWc,mit°v _ r r I rmrz+) O ry cwx It • ... usxo i voE um"rw JdM. I 1 on"r 1 - B� N - (w n,•nKn,o r•u�nl.1 _ la®t I: I � �" 7 �(� ,. 'mm[ p.,a . mn owxLr 11 ITT w•m wui coMmuu,v+ ',•. r - Z cJ= ex'rssxlwe`r'Wrcew lwroxror USEO. no-c ^I` ui runuxLz ro rosrK s,BxE ra,o of ms KLm orx sleune wui rmm�n r�a _ .' J P M KxpxO u0,6 SUPRiE0.riElD—E wlxe,L m,x 1(al�d,Y writ ea5,mlanw aw Mm r�OUOsk550x rp�i pr(x5q ri" ,w�KNu.rn 6[M _ BEffiM' w lnEnxw rNi rcrIGLL.56 PL.w rw rflE Q F MtE uCx6G,grl � - SHF SERVICE- SELF SERVICE- `SELF SERVICE- POSTAL STORE- -- DETAL•PBSM�i24 Etp G 2-5-2 6 .WALL SECTION•SELF SERVICE G 2-5-2 ah 7 DEfAd•LEfTHi DROP VE3mING UWTS C 2-5-2 dh 8 SECTION•3ATWALL G 2-5-3 a4 re.�..,oE-s•a. (ea.naz-s tvr-w re.•r'm-as.o-o _ s,/z w0_ —. J/P,xxlM[0 ar(sa xoR i) 4-1 z coon _ rxanmx rs sou°.. SGn"[OVILV _ f I ;"Y[LEO LI•e SruOi I I 6 j�x°0.IOBm�C U o - e xfM[xs•,6 0 C. \` 'A BLttxwc / I � - - �sro.lOEwxm wlwlH l` YaK[p r0 BLO[xsm•51tM / � / - — -- 1.•nacxnic e!nlEw snits — f - r (n 11,>7m F I.. x °a°ONaosi'o"va„o°TM,u°LA' \ I rc o wLr ,r-i. x sa wo¢en°w 1 weu,x M. y rxaUMEXSE:iucr°roT..nx J \I\ s/r narxo.was.µ,m - - i uiKruwa' a a r r-J i/r• .ro noon.,w. ra \/ /1 urins IL •- : - - < 6.... ncw°wr nau c �u nx.xm. easllc � Le�awmnee�� w L ra,wrB=< a•m q E�: wnLJ Voo°CTw+ m:rsrmeLu u: iauni+,eyr. rLxmcs. "4S F t .m Kw,uw rx.•xm ,xu,uxE wx waimrto m a c,wmKnnea x rax v'lcvi�wmwwE ncara.•x,x sc!vc ,mia,s. ,.,°A°'°!„W K nIF na mmc a o¢x "s nlourrc°m,x!cwi! 'O E .sE now w.w rw Knvi.xLi m•nowu �M ro eom smcs a ww. 'ro�iwmEx o!or�a«no.ErmenaE.s nc—m m!anL!.wur. U7 a e•'i POSTAL STORE-w s POSTAL STORE- .POSTAL STOREPOSTAL STORE- ,xs•so.w- g SECTK7N•FOlOBJC CYR1 E POCKET G 2-5-3 e 'Q _ DETAIL•FOLDPlO CY LLE POCKET DOOR G 2-s-9 E2 11 DETAL•POLDRJG GRILLE NEAD G2-5-9 In- 12 DET!l•FGLDr+c(77LLE RECENER _ C 2-5-9 0 (en..rm,aaxda —"— %�w•me...rm—l"TV:-rc �r 7 ax..ro:•samw•� �`s' ! . .................._........... �� • —.1i Vm BD ID SiR,cN E r / rya � a Brxl.x� w l uN rr a J—I —� a/ig:..s ws•c.c. —p R nr uo ulc.nuugx ux 'I� F - / x sows oR o.c / nnrooD mue:ED BErwtax cn BD Salt •Bwt�A!•xDUxO iNC BR'x�xc W � x iBD SCC11 oC rLL w • - ?v U•r,f V1 6 .II / • wxEL A r d _ ASR8Z44 rv1.bHMCE Yn+Ox o O(j p c a r q y t C Iq LdhLWXI - a • - -I CIA(NIF.)c_rsur •. P PREFAB ACCESS DOOR RETAIL STANDARD DESIGNS - -R1LL SERVICE — �...- � 'CUSTODIAL STORAGE ROOM- `" 1 DETA L!lKd fT COVE __ C 2-S-1 cl• 2 NOT USED _ 3 _SECTION•SCREENLWE BULKHEAD , G 2-5-5 e2 4 DETA�•ATTIC ACCESS PANEL `S,4-F s• 'h.we=.1.•..� ravi�.. —ems—.- ij ol s •rc oPRO`aBLx�row,xir90 - E J/ si xE_.rrv. mxr,rt '"`"1 A cBac ro>xE wru ' R - (� xo. � .. - � n.xr.•. r'o'�vf°m°rtcrm. - mocv�uw'� ^F ( - - � � ; ' - --a e _.. I-�/r nxxuss irzEL cxwv e.x� •••. '... • .— - '/ ./.•pLw4x,m. awrliEo rivarR RPC - xa(B Cam' U - .FAI sEwxE ro uw.'- tieS*s »»sxwax•aval "nul T:W.rFi o r - � E,romn Enm a wuL BUwERS ro avE�.uuxr ttv. rtoa+ . Gila D x-wx.eLax«c,m. scxar. `Y3 r-R rwsx rtaox TIEl axcxE ax ww,xr w.us i:�'«` zw�caEr":'r'�a+°fir eu�v�asvwo- r N d.� rok°Ywuai S"wnFR" x ` r waarno+;nLi uu Sw owe o,s��xw.rrslcxra mxaum 1'' O�o= f, a waa eurttln o ?.r.B"8�n£i°.000§ia.m� •Ed�uoi�s�cw,"-.l .0 Br oc ncn DErm.s xEanxw ro axorzcl waL amrcagxs - y 7 K; - 1 RCaIDiCD Pxo1CCT DK RD[x5,TKNw05- I BUwcxS ro BC DDudw51N x0 I. uw SWfL d E" uDill(A OBslxuGinns wAiaw51C Iw • Imo;')/R N O mlNSlwvB 250 lB,.r.TOILET FACtl.ITIES - PROTECTIVE BAFIR EFS- PROTECTNE BAFiPoERS- ~ 5 SECTK7N•GRAB BAR_ I,- 6 DUAL WATER COOLER G2-7-4 bS 7 DETAIL•WALL MOUNTEDBUMPEFS G2-7-4 e• - r•.I+rax-«>ee.l a F..ti^--.� xe.wuma-dee xdl.vm-x.. - Dx lC xmrs uuulxuu m. . .. r�ix""rsN iiooa m°P a w rgxE, - vwxl Broxr ixux aiumw L) o z m W - F" - d N �a rrsrE.xxs.x.•o.c..m. c z h3 Da ro �xfB'D x- '- '�' lE�wnRo r „mwrnnc ss.G wm avlx a =E I.ss�w 'ia ruvr wrzxxD�"'.s�awun.�. Vl d v, RETAIL STANDARD DESKYJS- ."`0"•4, 9 NOT USED - 10 SNOT USED — 11 _ NOT USED �— 12 __DETAIL•WALI(-0Ff MAT C 2-5-1 •`� 'O�SFEC -•c a0 N'J:S 'D` `a N k cn r as - —m I I�t • • , fD 1 ,»�s Hp Ed_ a F l . d�rpR• — � ��Ulm� ��'�• ��a � Q r7�Yl� �� DaaE odq F a Y 3�1 N .wD un]SC,Inu/I]lu PCEs) r0 ( L J+�r—, 1wr.� wx - S� eE R uar d R.ol Iu2R/I1 a -D 1 11D xu mrtix u[ Fnw - Y iEN • K.l� .ACT\��I M xOn NttF. N IE G SaAS d PKx IIOPKn 0 vm tx �6 mMi a`YwS, x51 S¢ - PKl 1 as Siory Br pus uwxm. Res 11a B I lOcf sCREw. )' IRpB xfxD SiB(,rzxNWAEv MINI Sd[pnu 1 S 1 1 ]5 I•r,RKE 1 t6 -. In uxn Ira[;ntwrx RfdC ma[Inn NxD rtunawu R`/10 vaw uc w¢vs Ill.rn0 Mf r.,n—Ifs .� M umc X mrta II I u x vB¢Ic l0d Tp n[w d Rr '.w R.v.xs ufRx 1n[s � �. xn,rc.� Nml(rgNpW�! 1 - - x+c(•1 vc SIwVs Iff,Nm ru,Vzni[RS Ns mx eEx' ufpN ttP.. Srtn s .¢as If0.BId MSrNL axJa Iwm Iw[a tav/1]fmr+c 1 I NJur, au 115 U wi oo ` i / 1 sm s'. 1m sm[tau 11)rrilxsi Em w]Si RKX/10 srw uv Sw,•BR IJB as - ] M EK N OOx[wa i wsrr4il[D IwtR 1R./1a rax.nvv rl I , uwtx I X Smx[uH 'u¢ss - f[_II99 rlgN waH u01Eit saE RENT-A-BO%- '• ,. r] -REM-A-BO%- w a' B.s a�"aivc ".Im avert sa,Rd 1R0.seal I s art¢r ams rmxl Li TYPICAL ELE�/ATKNS•P.O BO%ES NG 2-5-4 a 3 P.O.BO%ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS G 2-5-4 b sEla Rwa No Rw ftl s[aBr SmE du I"(.T.sdls)nvn.c Nm rwW wcn I10,uxD `°'i�.d..•.]a+.Nrfn-rw<.a`^v.-,c - _ (_ '�•sre. rmrcx-S.e.., �xn.e Nf rmrutwa PARTS LIST dEN PANEL OPENINGS r „•,,, N, 061 rd Nafa SCnC [xM5 I �Cunm wNl • rtK mOwx ( 3 4" ��fb1131®dN..ROVCn da • .. du Y m-a' m J I/Y 1. ).uDpfaL J 55 OL OJ I _,I/f I µyvBl[NrID MINI NL 113P5 PNw0[D PD BD%Xgprin.RKx.ISS[uBUES l.�irOP`rR`�ur f IT—d w ro s 1.0. Bm wnwn w Endf s[i¢Puc1a vay.,DED B+0srs. < 0uB� 0 0 r/` I)/6 J �v ¢RM,5 fwMSxEDfRwua N.D`[ Ix5 Nu0 IxrSt UL _ L d , lOt[m" P. - < rI0WIN1 S r O l/ ,t/Y 9wLR`wlpl"I`i14a,0 m IH wBI ra0`n¢RUSH JOx¢`SCREWS YW bb �._ 5 COKR Com¢iH IDN1 LIN' BIO t1 PDC 1011 -0 5/6 ,f-1 J/C .¢Swl rlmc'w Ni SdRwS.BdS.VZY6Rs,Nrp NUTS u REWIRED ` ^ K OwR(1im0 _ 1a 0 I/]- 16-,I/f S_SNHI KRiR'M dKN59x5 d,H wN1 Or[[BNOS BOv aKXS Ixlwxlx 10 S• • E . l 1n11 ¢udR aN M1N i rN SMm M,rLL rH PO FtFt Iwo RWB By mxxR(Is mq IB1x a •uxwirJm11r1rn rums(rums xu •rs.s NEasuRr. drcsrzR iwN e a voeoX PNrt15 ual ASSENBt16 SNNI 8[M,u)m ro ExLF[lxxli-mod' CIDSE r f w 3 URN [D N r;r�^J B1] HouptE µ�rOp, E) Jpx,3 fi iH MEaS[CIpx3 d NUPDKM Pra,s will BIKN VFAIIKRSIdPPwa D -} 'S SIRRIIO 0022. ERI U _ (0/1S Dx')/6•mE w,x ifmaC dRIEduRn eKx Na R23S>AtC Yx3IINF P.wR lv[o1-]tlS pt NORC wm) EMNIEO RuxS¢PO XCS OK SURf.¢) - „& -� ff.".Su5Ev85F Nip x [C¢0 e�PNa15 SwLL RC¢M [0¢S•x0 Rau[[N,SudnRs¢Pwn DW•K fa:JO CLi vUSi o< l.- IYP. - [X•m No N KS1. xx. II r1/Y rw rz 1 l S,MCNau Wtdr➢rfr0 IdX:xN W WON PuO. ¢ z- S' aJ w SPKm, )/f• ..6 SUmOFI.K 111EWwED. B.¢Dwl MWI NL PO BOX xuuBCaS NRD l[Bi[R pNP SXM. f � � -• .. ' ' R[W,f/f.I t/B vdl IOxC 9.0.BVOOO uTm ro H•e M.vex PKC m BRim IND Nl dPos[D EO¢S .� b z '/;�' 3�110 p3�A'faufixc n�lx00i.i SUPPORTS (ry N d• - .s wXvlm nn,.1/�Ip ro xssc sow xu+D•apD EDGE eBxD.c � _ � � �I � O o5 a e HXxdO G•xul. 1/11.311 JC-If, ro.P.Oq.[[BOXCS,2BN SEd[S ro BE fKidVi RW91FD SaMA II '1 t eYMO°D4.;,IIu,�,y;i wwNRDdr a o _ >. 5[,M Pfr.HND.i B.S/6 ED I� ,.I°w'' V`D`B"`WDxrEass vf.IE BE s•-c Nnf.m da.4t+irJl a.D.s n1E Sr.N[.s raR z o ." '-:- z�F: —D ro a[¢NE mo •ears'vf::uiaus.s HanREu. - aulvd mxwl} -o xs tl0n',xER HUD mxd w c K¢rr]al[roR caasrmX:tnx 5.a Eo.J N C REM-A-RO%- RENT-A-BOX- •.• REM-A-BOX • - J P.O.BOX PARTS lbT SC/iED1AE AfrD NOTES G 2-S-4 c 7 DETAL REM-A�OX ALOO7S G 2-5-4 cll 8 DETAL•P.O.BOX HEAD AND BASE G 2-5-4 f /61,N/@ lail,rra)srmeq feN•Ypt-a-.IJc a." n woRNNpX�sroE s/Is.>(�NnNuo ' - � • -. ' YKOw EO '[0�PI'RmY I`�� 1 n HrapNIlo0' v .. ' i+ - _ e`o 4%\ I �i I aKx 1mBM m I li ' I -)/• 0 B .r �im"DD" I,I oL�t o.DD�s¢ 1\, II w B F xpDD B D M N �r 1= dN13 m '.I I I CNNN zi NHa 0'. R -0 .. U 4 K z y� 59E,TBN,ie' ,r; 'If 1 v¢i Rw.1e11 1 r_aas.auiwr�"c oa N...vN.r w Kcam.N¢.m,DaldlEa.EDdu. - ,. � x� E d I' m—mnrD`IN'v 1,nE mflPKrox swu rua rill.Mi u Pw¢I u]nms.taw. q F 1pp0t_Y¢ Nwc( 01 s a PNICR E¢NExS Swil&S'-Q(NDNa xfM,SO NIC vERIKJi Null. a E wxN!ND fr[... kl_ roENM a,nE sRK a rw Pa,nx[s. rn a n REM-A-BO%- REM-A-BO%- -RENT-A-BOX- RENT-A-BOX- �, R.,,� 9 DETAL•P.O BO%JAMBS C 2-5-4 g 10 - DEfAL•PARCEL LOCKER HEAD AND BASE- G 2-5-4 i " DETA L•PARCEL LOCKER aAM _ G 2-5-4 j 12 ELEVATpN•PAfiC�LOp tS G 2-5- w r•.+.•n+-s.Nd11- ' - • � Z •/ /{ I III + I,I \ k � I . n n • •' ` vwios y . P.eP w II e s I U) I I m •w•a.n.. I~I a E" E• a. b44- • I .,»m..ww.w•. , tn0^- 'w CK'o'�- � pl.,.0 `- p�:._� _ 1 NOT USED NOT USED LOADMG DOCK TRACK PROTECT ON- PLATFORM RAC- - a--- — 2 - 3 AT1JN _ G 2-3-Btl2• 4 ELEVATIONS AND SECTION•DOCK&uM G 2-3-e dl- 1:12C. I t/r o.o una rows Eauur -_ .. E-F w.Cp. m o ' RUE[.amatwx ulm R[sm zsoi MoazwtK roRc[. - S F. ,.. MERRY aucxslox w/z¢vuu - Z c>- - '. - r 's.EvolmltuR asw a IuuP wml�rEO[Ru,sort.xo Eow.R[WaEMExR,siE F, - rnmrxurs Mrm xEnR ar vutrm>r ¢n o 5 NOT USED 6 NOT USED 7 NOT USED 8 PLAN AND ELEVATK N• 7FORM RAMP G 2-3-6 a [ w m- E IE A NARu OEt4 M. II' )O'w/ iuE�RIEC d`000X V x m rptE t411,1 —-dYx arvRR tt-T—[5 10�tteORNAIt IM-MSt .. OOw(C�wn. SEE�YCI M./M]x 4d' 1'! nta mCD RuttaR WRO W WO f e < r, 0, —— j —vsl mxc. I' � _ M•nt wnE,uw. }—'— I G a H 1, HA MIIC: �M.l IYP[♦5 SCM[PAED MOrt tEOnR�"'la uaA°n`"w�in[tO¢'I" „"�GC"•n"5 O"ry E'•'V 5 .COdNx,R W[xSWx nM�KN.L[OuwxE'xt SP[aEIGro — _ .r�C��pxt S t.MutW,GtaU OSCD x lSU M fORtexC ,(n Id tO.CtEif IYt[aiv[M SKIVw 1gM5. ]OtwMtl MPS 1�..MUtMCA t1a11 AR�aI 9W'�'w'¢CIM�LIpfR.p I Lm .�� E- 71 c«wax.RPLATFORM EOIAPMENf- fn< eu'i PLATFORM RAMPS- R 9 SNOT 10 �SECTKXJ/ UFT _�� G 2-3-8 1• 11 - PLA • L FT(ENCLO6ED PLAT) C 2-3-8 YJ• 12 PLATFORM TASK UGTf G S-3- o CrD o � . wee �o� s 0 1114 14 co I. - I'""- -_=r u�_ ,...�•� i r �„4 is i' � r b . NOT USED c 0 0:51 z rW —, IE (OVERALL DIMENSION) t ,/w' aD4q'�% 3 Saxe�2'-t 5/L6"'. 'J 5/IGn � ID o/c sr-teEL caw -isoiaorof roDy'� x"`�rbxi2UT tN ra-,1 ,.1,.cox 5 rat sEm¢ro xcaxxeeu SairwG ans[ucxrwc(iA h axEr. 2�e-t/f.xs in ' i5r I ., j. 4.O x,ENDm . x'rz swt a°rxoiwxEcr mEeaor tx.r ams ox wsuumx a'vr moo so rN.r �rz.waruw unr t xVui y` E- . cawucrowrzBu.uE scaEws 3.USE CaxIwUWS lLxax5 Cr-aG Caro•1 1D4r1(p!eRLS$ua wr I9Mrt1FD. to aM iwE [D Br USNS ro tN[DExE ro E6C —IB E 2'-T EWMEe ..ueE laClcuW BVD( 4YxECrOR BODY(xUwFll A.uV'ixrarlOLX Dx EDUH). CGxrW[rai rx,ro uUSr Aa�utAt,am uRixi,w5 waNRU ..D<Eoai (W.v ve.rN 4 E u7 O _ �cU CONVEWNCE OUTLETS- FULL Sl3TACE RAL SERVICE- . NOT USED _ - - 6 rNsT-LOCK DROP CORD G5-2-8 b• 7 STANDARD IA.T.COUNTER W G2-5-5 as 8 IRT.AM-ON ACCESSELE COUNTER'A' G2-5-5 al 'c ta+•uo:-ss.o-o D amUCro.wD eE Mx)•ti � - xE0 xaln5.uCx 8'.6 uti6Eo xH aND I . F U txx ucNi°nmB' �: i' t"ooJ urxa Do.xD .I ix/eta .cuox .� U /i 0 on I am,r En o EDBErs�.� a ucx wc«a u I db+ I c o DMEenYwmo • :":::°'gs1dn$a.d`"xar sBq 4�t:�`""""° µ�- 0.0 `= con FULL SERVCE �i'tw+,oE /sr w�¢n w.cSEo wr++R rm roan woos. 10 11 12 RIALDBJC DENT RCATKNd- G2-7 Nor USED DETAL•MENu BOARD SUPPO(if c 2-s-s a CTOC11 Roots slcACE P pPFIS -----.....__...._...- — — -- o o � ' AIx PARKI..—A PxoNa.1....a wxu. I.s—D..rrn I., —D LEKL , w 2O ISSALL WASS AND,PRDNDE-D•sgtC1NED TOP—AND IYD - - GDINLv w/U AN STA D( FW(A DINA ACAND FMN BY „T • ME E AND ILLY HANDICAPPED(RL-A)NANDDpM.AND(COCRAL d - ' s1Arz AND IOCAL W DEUNCS. Q'.. A. PNONOC CASING AND PROPDSID(FADES w/I.T. A. SSBD PARKING REQUIREMENTS - - 4HLNARaNFxrs FOR DETA LEo acNEw a W.D[s Al eu LD Nc 0. "ETER AND ALONG HANDICAP ACCES—ROUTES w 0. THE PARKING CONFIGURATION IS BASED ON }u lr.AxsJ - n 5 SSW 105nOw CWAL 9rt L VADW THE STANDARD PLAN AND NUMBEN OF BOX SELECTION - ♦—__r — --__ ---- — --- --._ —_-- % _- ___ _- ._) w q CN4WS 0!ME LOT,uCRS AND RWIDS lW 1DASEo �nV• •M�c vmw R,u .�.: 'L - - KLL Pl.o ¢.ORdxuq LNrc �4,.,L `D ). L NE nl tt S RNCCS SH-BE SNOW UNDCROLOJNO AND x _ •""", a•e. :, a.a I ..>, .- - _ O rl R 1.: - Lau ED s CLOSE TD-uE.N AL ROW - _ F U to c� -- - �� `� 9. 91Ow ALL[ASEYExIS RUNxmG MRWpI nA 511E lA 10. Stow ExSnINc Ka1ARK CDKR IN0.UpxG TYPES OF TREES PA—., J xCNCS.AND PLANT LIST, - — „ r DxuNA¢PLAx�mcxlav DcrtxnW AND xERNnox AREAS v - I _- I PUN Y[W"}(Fm.) 'y�-'p R � w d e I iz IMx NY u,LrzMALs AND puEx4Ws a pu P Nxc.dMes. T 1 59IEw-1 R-1 WAS;AAEAS.NANOCAP A"Ps.aRs ars caf°"He,coNc. D 'O3 MM arAAs. ._ rW Dsr ^ys - _ 1Jslow euuD NG uxau'mauDINc s[Duas AND BlmnlNc w.a r • _ ))_ �- - 4 YE OO _—E14.A pCAIE XPnC SYBR uvWi(1!APPUCADLE)W/REYNK Y. A M'xl R— f ANRD xf OZ a .. �• A¢ _ _SNwCLK e• ,. < n .. %A¢ARo.wtt 1 O)1 _____ v/y` E D" - 11 4IOW wERAN05 OEL EA110x 0 W RAR ROOD INE. r : . rs r �: a oc.LL9Rdx A r CS Pwxwc ....... __..__ Rr. zl- tE. pY[NSIW NF}1 LOCAMN AND AxT I.A.RADIUS,. ' I COxc REIAPaxc rALL T O O O O O O :•. O I n t). 1A.D5CAPE xW w/SxNUBS AND Mas LAYOUT, "v AT iE6 - Ax 1. NSTALL CWCRErz WRBS u LOCARIW OMERS MAX 9DW 6 N TOwN6 DOOt OrA O} •.�YpR i ERR xCE¢D TO<W M0.wARR FLA. OW ' w/BROdI[0 SNlal - . �� 19. ONO Olt AND SDCwAIKS 10 Cf1u0.T MM REaVIRD1FN2¢ 6 12 FT. AI— j$ f'- ai }�D� 1-LJ. LOKMHNG AUMaMiIES. 6 1-1"AS—S.PRONDE—W TE O1RB AT—1 TAsxDDFAN - 1 1 MC Lrt[r[1 °-TREE H "Eorn)c REW R yx 31. CURB ars RApUS To BC: c—¢—000mc vW w {, ALTNT C5 0.OS 3a RCT - [r] WKR O nmNW9 BDAS ON[. U POST OFFICE DOKwoAro.wrv/p IAuNxa(sD.asALE'wsNtLz) - •S l %Aar wO•Ao a: W ' I 1 u - pNIN[WAu . ° _/1�' RuBc9G rtWi��1.uL uE oAewEI>ul nbm sl Ps, z2 OEi:)/Cz-.1 ANTI 7/C3.3 FOR[xiEp)R 9Wa6 IT PA-1 )" im, ND • m� au[xlW NsAaa�rBA W Ac N AN. wANt °Ao O ANTA.[--K—Is OcAI ma wE-'Frix No I a AND µ.7 sC..5,10/Gx.l s1E BYLeoLe PROOr O—A... U] t AxD wla. - i _ _ O i2/C31© I EI x fOR p:iAA9 _ BIAIdHc SEWER 10 PUR,1C SEWER O . vrtJW¢BpoW-Ot,a v %rSR - i- (1�vP i 0 O I , —— 9ULDNL-.R rRW PU&lC IIAN - p"o DOwN.Pdt20 rMKA %. CD¢O CONC.W Im P0.E. 1=1 - — rztEPHOM SCRN¢ �zF N WuaNs Prt�Na R�T u BK I ;FDD AREA ♦-5£E DE 9Ah ::. #w 0 Ix w4F"♦SAmlmc A �YT BAIX N ACLpfDNR¢ CAS S,.¢SERN¢ N F ' [[{{ M AM9RIAxAL STAxONDs AND—1 - i 1��/\7 D PPoVAtY :.x0 C / qO NAE�OPE (� L A RU LDINc WARP fRW WfIL - �1{III OM[L (ryP) L^J�_i A CL[A"WT TO WADE SET IN 1}-.Ix•.0•CWC.PAD —1 RS OD¢IS N xAIN M SVSRu R0�W , y ® ® ® ®I© ® ® AN. O POWfR PoIL . xDl lfy Y V.¢(�). Q� YAK NYDILANi OL.W rfum ivDµ S "R -- uNNL �/'!^, A PA-1 - Lry 1RCE OKR J w01E5 O.WER(WANIIIT-Nl) R '^'K YH'jsa u " (� REOKCn uAOYAP WRUR(aANnn-30) E PLx TO ¢Aziy %or[P(mI t-P x I clw, xso Ntx i 8 p��ous sN�m�ie(aAxnn-Ioj �vWroAaNpINDMNtxx[�¢[Nw5 w nDMArDo IDwn(aWN[9 LRac SAnnd90 Lws Mtt mA� I' e 3 Da _ (/( uxOEv[nff i B A LCKL `r"['E" M ai n NOR M ' (L�UJ' PiRCMA tC--N.SE N M. l)st/C )/4- z—(w) , STOREAi R 0! O OOC PAKxI CALL[ .1i / O -PAK uE N 9R DEVAtgx I L I LO:AL 1 0¢MM . OxONANa RR swHa - s,AN"lo�.lm°'n:°:AI11gMImwISLOwA .R eox acTx.N:. aR p1ANAa wD T— ANA° awmerLDcu.x OR I � SITE PLAN °ARixwns w ro o - _ R1RF fuxBC A5� AND I Y 1 ' I m# I 1_ i „• �I � i /r T/�I I � ut, ¢ f r •,fix I` __� \��. IjI�I I:Ii. ��1�, ' I { - .= EU o 12 '-r� ��.� - I l I r' I I " ,,�'"�.U'^'• trlu .uc I - - [M X „. m�rvsE rm cD.rs a ROH R 1 cl.E we,E P I,rm. .w.N C R\J M s♦ �` •cn� mE DETAIL OF HANDICAP LGGO DETAt OF VAN ACCESSIBLE DETAL OF HANDICAP PAl>KING SPACE BUILDPIC DENTWCATKNN 1 PAVEMENT MARKPIG G 1-2-4 gl 2 HANDICAP PARKPJG SPACE AND CURB RAMP G 1-2-4 g4 3 AND CURB RAMP :G 1-2-4g4a L� FETAL MONUMENTS _ __ G 2-7-5 b _i wdwla.l.w.x-.ylea'"L. r= _c 1-1J-1_ '7•R•rdwl fsza'SI —r--,- ,7�.we.w/e..um.z-of—e.w, lw...,m--aw v..o 1_i_L_ ¢'-�A--- ---- gym r¢D' 051 C A euu .w0"C EL I HI vuty Edam G"`> ,Ru EHI UC�KS a.Es r0 U N Tlx T w.r PARK7JG �`[ I __ u.wEE mR wnE rwrsll—�. as mle E� ewnrE - _ i y eEEc s,m Moroi lwrsH b:e A _ i�is" z:na is Q D i:-:ia E xr.lr" i:-:ic o 14 - � s �� • - rwvl acwE W P..EUERI— - - '' w.r �Prc SIEEKv wmArJl� o nsluu,o+ D 1� r••m e• E ti - Tfil rM-Ra- R. R — SIN I wxnE_ 1 1 M '-a • ' PROM C ro PCR EECC,RMiA - _ CWaE - • O O OCf is xfii COnod T i IYfif R �IMf� I p <tnR lRDR.eD[ro R - 16.IT - �#I J6.J6:aG .f6.lY E- .. C.IR y' %=R.: ' Sn-.x HHWH�"Dttn,EO um CORRECICD 6v HOIL - n� Ir.lr � r.mrtW faO,wC 10 eC I O B[lw.(AoSr InE.C[5rwc '—' EOUPN:AD NRTx[0 PVOE.m[wEe£R R cRURR ,uRD[D cR.xO[.OR W.W 1M11L .. :. N O 4 BUaDING IDENTIFICATION TRAFFIC SK?!S •• IAAFiiC SK!JS- _ I lumrwrE nE sw PnREIs ar.ls _—E .. '* i.POTi Rg1Nf.UTC ROxtORROTAf S/6 wxCRRIE eWrS / RS. i PEA L6l 5 RETAI MONUMENTS G 2-7-5 b1• 6 TYPICAL ONE POLE TRAFFC SKYJ G 1-2-4 c 7 TYPICAL ONE POST CR1ClMTiON 5K7NS G I-2-4 d a w u D r usE xa-camo rt a a uc exrs w/ ExPu mx v uDs.!PER scx. ?.w-Na[.�m-za.e.R ur.*o la+.raz-.�o-v"'3i..rn i.fw larrm-z+aec yr-ro- r v/sr.¢mx. - e xarc awRK wrc EACC A SI.V(E Al ME w :Ic=a<`oncn°°""""urs,luAloH — E.D Dlw°Nr-ioR n c ccaRv coHiwcroR io ca'HEc°�D mHOc �riDwxcrzR i0 j t. ..12`3� 22 [Mxcu fwlu Sd[IEA,o.POf OC I-1 c.<ro PRMCC 1!r Pic rut CHD A,ME TM:H/6E IDCxiW,6 M,N.[CD !L DCD BfaOj 0 PDia6E<,RL4 PRgx ID S[w.[i M�uUlnx. LOlLwOlACE r T b R - > Swx OSxlwcroR/D.c.,o tMA[wOCRCRWHD xx0 wnIERPRI[x'[oHHC[,q(!uAILSS Ov OMfRT—� IE[rRfil.COrw[RiON fADw[0p1,D O,xERnY RCWgN e•D]rK 1 � / —E.R4p U[ru. w I , I � D�CDORDwnlEO AMD CDwrtcUO Rv J. SCx lMaGrgx,YlPPPG,xRD M,PlIAADII uEt, of I M Ow A u CWOUr W PER[ME "' b wuuu O! �/ REWu¢wurS __ I 16 M[ELcrWGL w[R - RUTNED RI KC65 M. I` A @YWO wN.l SUxIUS wv u..ro20.w0 EpWpIinOYepUaExDIfM l w / / wEFA.ul ugls C - _ DDull. wE c. } e I }x=rwLJICR-RCI.wRt 9G!xR a40S� „ b b /vY —� MaW P —r J S/a•r./n �" 7 � _ ._.� � ,� I i �,RKK�IX,D,ECINprd LlJwl E--TJ_ _ P.xlef! DETiut rE tmOfw..0NEp1 Of I 7 rEEciRcxEr[w ro a R[E. 5_^"c_R4f=5.D!uxE1R ra -LVE.- - uDtc , _ RC nt wl vu., A. I mnrrkEO!n0 W,ar soH. - IL��J1 I.vsE nm co..s a ROH w BUILDING DENTIFICATKNN ELECTRICAL PAVEMENT MARKNM- EXT6UOR LK)fiQK' 9 CAB NET AND 24'sTPoPE G 2-7-5 r 10 BELOW GN'!D.CONNECTION OF 9 ECiPoCAL G 5-g-2 bP 11 TYP CAL PA NfID SKMGE GI-2-4 f �2 1HROUGH 7ME WALL SIGN CONNECTION G t_ mnx CT . 1 _0. T E C\2 _ c_ T-S7-erro�G:,mx-Axp nmawloil.-- � sior fir. c W1111. zruurlDrT:. II, W u—I - _ ,� j t n.swxc F1 �l I%c' I�i 1 '•� �I'I1- UM SI—It.top o- � E^ 4 cnry ��N'cF AT GRnnE , I I I/:cuv..wn.l r-- _ - C1. w a a E it 1' 1. roul+0xwmc Station PJame r= fi] i StationName .--I City,ST ij mxcxcrt ws[ �1-i Cih. T S t yr srm xAw o- L� _ _J sw,iw[-axA sr me xxr-sr.rux ep TYi'IGAI TON I' /•• 6 srt[[ scx trot w-sgnox ID vuw[s m•['xxr-;urwx �.f�L �ORNFR OFfA� .� _'�_y koo..¢n ro ports us Nxns . '•'•': ,FlG RAGPOIE BUILDING DENTIRCATION szx rou BUh.DING DBJNRCA710N 1 __AROUND TFiE O�TANK�AND UN fS G1-2-4 g8 2 DLTA� C1-2-4 7 STATIONDRAOUE AND HOURS VNYLS— G2-7-5d - f] STATION®AND HOl1RS VINYLS,.�ww�z-e••.. _a ems.?'- _ l...w ro.xwa- g,1'^S;r_ 9 v •rr - G2-7-s m caux[Tc sox f s p'.�, r woos.ixp xis.sew [n.9�celo}[, Iuuunrs v.u'xr(rn) NOTC _ __ - __ IA j:tt[ pqq C 1.SIGN FURNISHED By USPS AND INSTALLED By CONTRACTOR. 0 2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION. . ANEW FACILITY IYIonlnz kIm ru IDT—S}Oto— I B iSICN TYPE I TEXT ON THE SIGN TO BE: uwry _ _ cnu• R mmuvnrs bi I —_°___ _ N _ Employee PorkmQ_ L1 v.. _ axcm,e mxuR cauxsc LI ,(p_I _ 1._ 0 I Customer Parking_ _ W l © - vxocroso xLaifGR ..wp1°c - ; P L— Off ciDl_Parking i�l LL IA ww.irt0 auvtt Daz I I r a"[i}a r � � I-: _0 i Author hicle Ted Vehicles Ell coux.trto suaanc el 11 } 1, . !-�� II I__R ___ Enter. OFF ` i 1 I R n115 DFlA4 wM IRn awp s Sxbxx Dx sDE Pvx -I}u5.a Nro xslx I¢auxwoxFz� . Driv p Noll nI ( I• DwFA , g ODnle o U cy P y a 6 I �' D or000a zuwMna a asun6 1 [.vW}mM e�AxExenxn mxm v cur w , xa2 • �. zSICK TYPE L-a a F 4C xDiC le/xD}D Ox-I Sw lue+a+awo N e[—o In uvS we w.m[ [6son -on EDGE OF 7HE CONC.BRlRA PAVEMENT SfTE DESIGN- "'°":BIAL.DINC DENTWCATION .. EDGE OF BITl11AINOl15 PAVEMENT GT-2-4 a 5 __� 6 CONSiR 1CT ON SIGN FETA�FACLITY G1-2-0 e2 7 RE(IA ATORY POLE _ G2-7-5 e2 $ NOT USED a I T. wm or Ir a D.FA-uv ec re�x „ous w[2.[m(nv l crs w"�-_z rra ixc wr svrc,�cc ^ - T - Icu°owxcarc.Top It J rut e,r owpxcn:0 T/__ v•c vrim rtuo:n°� x[xxw IwMfw ecru DD•x Ir. r xNws,iro., c t mvc.a"m _ I i tw enuxnrs msxcrt pAw.c ouuxs I I auwAAx rut IL_ . .I I tea^, I _ •y I coxanc rao[wc 5[F N01!Itl xN0}D DM[t 1 V 9 CONC.Ct�Ss DETAILS•BfTUMINOUS PAVWG G -2- D PROTECTIVE BAfIll CE TEO10 12 - LARDO - x _y_4 g,. � L GA�SESEB1N x _ \ cprr nnp r slE 9�T Ci� uETEx P t (Mo.ac,uxO p F P _ 'PExUFxT St'x xxL[N —_i _ _. �FC w117 III. / I s n �- iIF wcE vxK - - - - L wA1ER xIATER --LPL x�o xp r_ _— --- �1 I , ,w C pK i - _ --- -- -- - - pw ; n - cppx I� ABOK rK��l �Ci [ II Oz � •• o o o ow SEDRAN c.,P2 FOB — � - PLUMBING FLOOR OR PLAN " Q1Ux1 w 0 __ weT92ODIEL 90BOT W /Z O OKIT IA' W o .. Owo F _ n r ttooxL v PE swmr a r oser�o F m nx BY E....E ca+m J/ a o a " wATF1ii10w swttW Po PEN sMGx R.EAR Ix WE 10DEL xsx-11 w O By - we ELECT—NTTxACT¢I LUK xARp fOR$BfiT, z N F ' ENLARGED PLUMBING PLAN ,- - ; _O SPRINKLER HEAD AND PIPING DETAIL "e sfae 4:•T-9 swc xna /—Ax�¢x PAwnnoa - - �x9rtnnOx Qn CifAn IEC .�A� . e1� SQtEw x1..1ITxA55 1 MTaxLE55si¢L - � ��_ � MsuUnOx 9�iELO •• ALL hArC I . rz .\ � qi• �pPAxWOrxCn MOK INMp� O nrr. _ 8 T:aLgNK i� FOR WEurEx I �-IX ws PNE xAx¢x I�.11 9xK BRow 2 TOILET LAYOUT ELEVATION - sEaE DETAIL—PIPE HANGERS DETAIL—WALL CLEANOUT 3 WATER HEATER SHELF DETAIL 4 ., xo,E 5 2E Kos swE 9/:•r-a - Y. o >°' C. A K"r�"i PLUMBING I IXTURE CONNECTIONS SCHEDULE' F., Tn 0' aW�µ —IL.—x x ror ni - �cs'wm7 n n w o < aiCa - (j —ER CLpsE ( x cnrrc) � /z' _ 0.' 'm < `,,yT/�} rnvnrrnx t )' /n 3/a i / /< co. xc . i -- -- - _ �Lppn oa.Haei¢iwc TEWPERnrac j - nao u as Vz- 051 1� I c • - ,. \\�L— o . � cns cpcnbm) - ��w I�cn¢ IT A.F.F. - I WASTE AND VENT RISER c .J 1 3SRISER WATER HEATER PIPING DETAIL w SCxL nUK F v) - a ou.i crta me »/:c Bnb(RUw TKKuIEn SrM Pp� .• - - y _ -. rcw rcw. To.w•oiws'xN /—a xaEa.n, u,o _ - ` -4 w I � /� .µ55UaE EE r�aa�rs�suaE aEDUQxc 1 c.vi r.�D/.•xw. i-cw TO sanw.�cn»E.n _ ''• . �. E Dn,L\D\w/a 1 rt PRC59raL L[CCCDi 'Gw ,••`v Q • - . ep n.SL rta 1�•� ..Y D v a r',i3d\ ccnxc exD DEww .aurzirw aoL•.. sEA CE �pu sEs..-AIL A>E /^�n/.•c.w. PIPING SYMBOLS .. .. A, e $ IDS (�Ai<wKlw.Dpwx Kxr aw»pq`x -'---- • ,, ' .+ COLD wn,Ex R Nc L� cw n I �w, i w rza suvvLr/•»aE STOP wD • c.w,ntlpK LL RE.xaUr(Boon w»EaE M xD,Ep' n I ED) v CRwp,v,U _ rnun=«—LATE L.rE 1,r<s �w� RUDn a/.-cw� c D/<'cx� � ti( ;`dam • . `Sr�u aoo w) U � _ O 9 c ) O 2 H W.AND C.W.RISER . - C o � r—T r.a.E,NP dPE ^^.R - _ TO C UHrt6UPW. I o= rwI., cn Jrt TI 10 rtuea E W. I 4 pl i r�e .I W. TO • I l Lwr D r ..i _ S1LIJ -elf -�c M �i �- /p�.�3 �� I' 0 ", — y µu r uxit r,vnw ui¢a I .rom. _ rxvnr m,Ex xda t, fio _/� h x/ d wa. f 7a wPE Q/ n I J �d ---- caeExSEP i0$Lr.B,nTKx . Al II, . ' f ` tll i- aaa0 rsrex ur•a0 - ( o<c>u fnPax) cscEr. sEce/u i I L'wLgMp x�K 051 P��aoa Q - POUPO dL SEOP,•LE it � MuvEP - _ •_.O v.ue a.c0wd+nE - (ALTERNATE OIL-FIRED AHU'S t UNIT HEATER) COMBUSTION AIR INTAKE - - '- MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN - "- MECHANICAL ROOM PLAN - / 9 LOUVER DETAIL FOR OIL FIRED AHU'S ' - p 5vi[:ro YiiC RaumP,o a rcLD u2Paxe1 -. " was ccoi.w-aear..a.v- ' Ea,d ,00. cn xEn .A o d 0,t ru m 0 w�1AP I CONDENSING UNfr DETAIL a.. GAS DETAIL 8 I SUPPLY DIFFUSER IN Til . . - ,. IX !I II J < 3 FULL SERVICE LOBBY/WORK AREA < =e o<50OS• .. "F. i - ... 'ti- f wR'iw Vr x r s"u Wort vertu r a M1gN A 3 ,: ..1.•LVn—I -.vex � .. �rw I wmn aas .. ,r�efNuvE[ _ . a li ,rer a,wmac0�` mae«i3Ox�a,n < P) sacs wI r i �' r. LOuhP— eBOL�a:� sa r sa en,:rm •I. I• '. I LOUVER INSTALIATKNN DUCT SECURRY INLET AND OUTLET DETAIL FOR BAR PLAN SECTION $ (FA INTAKE t COMBUSTION AIR INTAKE) 6 :r-.•a 7 GAS FIRED ANUS(TYPICAL OF 4)- L ENLARGED MECHANICAL ROOM PLAN s`"`Y0 SEtlE HVAC EQUIPMENT LEGEND + em — w x e awxt _ _Mxws,.r ,rx.., u (.olxn R«�«`rtw`man ro"cu•win nn miiao" I \� u u.rr tmca e ( wv�"'.c fml —( aCx, aac rm aw uwurtKwr s.,acx i- a r ay.an N; cn mxaarcx rw Tx: tlwrxva:x r/m �d/Inq x— � i{ Ra w.x.c awx xK xrnlw xw aa[f _. _ �,. /—.nvNw.tr xa xunan I E. e- xx � —maw aaw. a eras wxnl W W i `a vrc � ? �nut nR I I °"' fn iu�rx F/I ua x[asxxr mn/ama r W r�rl+wrKc. xxen maunwx xx arsxxwx i—P 1 I a rr - xvm ual (�rw,t xaon;ril*wmnaw - 1 \J, - m swru o..v'x mx .wxc w �s - u a rrn sm. \Vr cS�' _..: ra mom m w C-3 Z j i - I� Rx mxKrax oadxa amsup� Y Iaaxn a w - cst •wws�omu.cs �®_ an.c mv[x- m¢omc rm vm �ao�w.mcon�s,�i.�.rK im.:w w uay. ''/a°uK wiruar i vl —R ox%^ aacr amm Va xra.I aw —p/m - i taaarnx xlxr�rxn /•n w.ary x,v-n>wn/w� '..µ—Z 1 Q o r xa SEPARATED COMBUSTION i - ^ UNIT HEATER(GAS FIRED) a` - FIRE DAMPER SECTION w�. w mxw oawMa uaocaa u ,.os smazmx scut Nor Tosera 4 sFxt xor ro srat d WY�W • ox cd. (I)rxx•4 xaou/raUxn _ _ __ - '� KalS1C'N W['r INDt - mxax,�ta � r AIR DISTRIBUTION SCHEDL'L� L. _-- OZ � - � - lYRRat nRR1Av xmu[ mntcnox �� un ALTEft I� 0 at rr¢n rvxwrss µu lerl .(>I tawx Ra I a:a so/,ssx-I ax w I suxr arrustx x.s x+. .. �n.Rxnrox �r F aawaxwwr �I�t,�n�oawwr . i o saArrm,� :a� I a rt¢x xrloxtt 1 srvm iw/�rx/w i -� v �`��. p °o� Inom[..rock wwtxsnu uxls) \ i auc anm+aeu +e a re o[ai¢ . RQIIS. \ 05 mRmt nee p aaR I.1 n(xgSruf'KI,�00.-m[Rnx� sW.i w.rw r w r Kr M ,. - �, m0.rm. SapxY rat MrtR'a.0 alI CDR wRP wo rRl Cx. � i a --_�r' \ I R[11FlN UN[ i.r 11 p acAR - a i -'" xpmt�M ptblltt lwrx./'11' • � © fSIK .:' ,.R7 xoxtrRat n,wnn n[xuosru onalas stxw.s[w^trcbxc ..- .-. my J U ` u11aw,C xUIL+0.CbwGE d(x v5[(II fm OxnwC tr � ax m m OIL FIRED FURNACE i �'awan rdn"`mwsr«a«ox 'ro[v a«tn ro Rac - e a:�a awn ff/xx UNIT HEATER FLUE THRU ROOF DETAIL REFRIGERANT PIPING DETAIL w Rau amlddr v— swi:NOT to-LE _ x - `• sw£: Ror ro sfxE p o nu xxt sWd mm�[um� c'namsui rax ♦.• I - V)y ' rmcn. T.1�ma0a IT rwrcu�[nu(cwvw.x rn.xl+ CpCN15�aMnrt wm'« 0 6 ^ xaV.ro 5[M V m 6 r1BrxO5ur S.SRK. _ - o i • a ro nd -M/RO WK Nv max4axupt. - r , . - p"'O O _ SF 'I - x (ro yr xaarl - + F TYPICAL CURB+ — ^m EXHAUST FAN HVAC EOUPMENT salt Rol ro srxt - E%INIIST F/RS w t tlwm ¢xw wm sroar ,.uw,xua w "a1e - x coax xoa - - FCs . n s L i son 1 ^A uc N wx 0 1 _ a-}. xaon.'p xanl I e.7s ci•. TYP.DETAIL OF COND.DRAIN UNIT KWER 5(:Ot X01 10$FInE npu nr '' w-+fan-rs®1 1 sn-e t rwto mausnort rrx mew x saaao enm ruvr-.aam blux amyl '�\ ' � .xumx xaon r xrur i rw.+wxnm bvs w-I/pv rap xwx.nd/I Wmx-nmq[seRrcx xlcr ux stxr Rlxwgs a,.,axasixr _ us ass n __ / , - w-(a-annl smnwa woo:I^aar d. o aR+us+R+r^r�mt wl arrtn mAao ew+nvr-snom mw wlxn wr ti ra ml. smr n`ms`wii _ 1 TYPICAL HVAC EUUIPUI:NI NOTES u mawc ron=snw soTnw a essm oR nu scan tawrn,eRR nrA rxwc ..— o ac sa xm. c$`a°rc�.+�. �a,„i_I a =___- m.a� soa�-w.nN.61 ua swa-swa+[SI.xo.Lm.rox wmrN[Nx 9W�mc. >I r�x[rdaRwl uaS Rx uuarK�aexs ws,mKlgns.(water r I � i emrR`ron[ o rt xx ..uam auva.[r w.b rt^txllun.n 1. I m} ,ew„ - ta�.wm a aRaxr.era aur�awurc n m+�ol malart v^a x.cs nm r-mw a duw,w ma nI�m'p-"�vwn r mos[o mm�`i`aW.'�ro uvs wxm`�ic,x�`c°w� 1 rt aim.aua um xaun ro nam adx..w tounoxs .•u-�— . xwa roUxxxr sa vtc+nsrux scrw orn° sl wK wRa^ox-srto s arsw..rc mamx. 2w" �, r.) [acr mrwfrnws u wu-suer w^arum msod't't anus xxo mum druroa^rrc rt,o ad s,wxn.w. xy xws,wtwwc xxb a[arm.•t i)r+ax'of rKraw rarwun ual-arxtln aura ra marnxc w¢ ro.l w xwd�atR w"a'sm we wn +.)^mmt frnart wSVU(n wtx rxeSSux axrM rd m¢,av'tm ua5 an""�wt n+w�oucYn M SVa wnx�Q%x`v`x9aL aRx9wa ra I wenw"o.we 1ti u•cw'n�r el v �c me w�+, ...•- ar. stria aa,Roxx.Kmmaxu Ixc craw xw w[wus ^ x rK,«�ar.,.n ax.a n.r�R wa aaaa,era earorta.a as�[: / ` SECTION A-A AHU-1+AHU-21N MECH.ROOM .......r ml mat nK m ^m n ^a r c b.e c.cs+r oaw a a u TYPICAL FLEXIBLE TAKEOFF DETAIL 2 sFxe nr m svaE At _ �nl wm«or rKmw wsrwub rw[o-err mama tl�a•rl wa �rvax suer va'dxw•rows'b IaaiprH suer par,w^xan+aw 1 5{/yi; MOI TO SGi[ - wmawrc asrt mx mxaxsrc w wxoas, olaa xw attssawa a xxlcxrza ... ' . �I,GCRtI M130 G NO: SVP4/,[[Ex0 nYxnrSx w/n nuwr.S Un,Pew. - O ^� O Cr P,rf.w ra Wrm O � nax®x xPM o wNu n[nPIKU xxe wxw,Eo Prwrui4 navrKLL t) - rN -- vur xPPnro runt nr,x'!r C, o .. _ - •. __—_ If) .SKnox wr ":r r v -wxt PP3rxw nwwNrC/lu[dr,urnFO wwwl!d Gunn P♦ w PS xOrtO - ` 'r a - ME rw p Pru rxxrnm ME wx xwxne —I co e - C of w 6 xnrrD [n[Mnx SSreCC ' _— _ I i � , .. nEax xPxwnx wrur -- ,nxcnox ew x cEnwc rw C"-.� i j�\ �m UY nExc,a Pxrrwxs .. is-� / �'`- /�. !..: I ' _ I F PwA,xPm Eni,ten wa n,wn.�r n,nEx'r PKx • „ — _ wn _ cn wawo runr.rz!m�n.n e... wrn:xnw rw - �' ------- --- I. 0 nx ww o_ wr __ w "r rtlrw w o P x M v¢ wimAird iijjjll/LJJ�� x[uEv� �✓ � 1 � J �� \"; .� .. r�'':.'i O I I � a O w ❑ o�w _ IA arc.rJ J _�KLr—p&q.�� PPwxanocsxx sr u nmr.x c six cl uwrrmro quucartueM n uwE c+A�.w n ddx/mw wa:dv/nns n ruurvxPooudr#we x aaiP,v emrtP--_A-,,_-.- LP __ r�❑�7nOE' .�_) _- _-� oM 01 d mwoo w ww •. - .+- C W rE/fR-Or C4BCU PO.A OCY R_ S EPNSLO.A,R (CIFRKSIDE) N-MECH RM_ . 061 s0PON SENSOR w (CUSTOMER SIDE) :3T}® Z • uu-rvn m wcnx rxr weW coax - - - .E A � � •. -, POWER FLOOR PLAN ro �,• 'roca dw tsr« . a.ro � 000000 oN.z e rert:xaumw w n tta.w,Ew efwx,wx wnnz)vwf az,i x Mr,u.o.x. - - ' _ 0 C�0 G G um -001--,. -*--� '. npy1C0o6r:o au�wPn xra!wnax xo • e , _ .. W mmacro s v[wx[o m cannE nKnx'ors - - �LY • CU'-'c, �'x/w amid r¢aix[ PaProE xm im anei Iw Au Irtus usrto w M I .. , - - ! 1 PYDL - O m G li9[Pr(crex5 wl n[nnrY fOW.r[xr enEa.AE USIEo W,ww - CG • rnS wRvwA - - - ..wxt�w nwE Pr¢moE smaoS wrc acwUa rw WIRING SCHEMATIC F N rt umPcu rPm s.o-uw.c sxn 1 PdmE.unrm+roar ExnvAre:rw m Ii9IE5 o S wn wrc xmue.wxrs Pcz.m vEcwrncs wwrm PnmE - - -• ue wrtv gun w Pa�Pw.YM sExrn,den-A-mx. ' e'slnuatn� Ka auw�(sl do u«°r�.PciaMra s. 7 o�i7 uiErwn ro a rnmao nw ti xanrmooxp11m. � - ,. _ :.x.wc�'v""xrz a ro,crA+rt.aec u M uovxw0x.wex x amPmr a Ai M 6 rn o rto amxrs rax EwwExr ro a r - .s,- 5_v u ' 4IID N n[Prn[e rw SMRS EUxU. - . -.. 0.Pn xp CMd 6 PN�wi. 9.Y[SNn n x rw nECiRUE 0[irAS.iL-xnr rtrea 1 MIDr 6 ro�efKM,R M dxC P4 A tlflR[x1EPt M 114 YEM1R YxL 0.da nPwrxS.xro 6 PKnrKS. - r t7 03 nM r/t.nrf.rle xw aro i rr!N6.� oULIx,IEO Prll M nfRt rFM[S M nW rw r9r!E Mw KEYED POWER NOTES sle,xc.1010..c M r C YE—N—R P.nrArr w MIJ. ew r ra,q.,s Pd aPtraI NO mr.rEa m A tw-rP �'�,� r vc\ r ;' 3 CUSTOMER ALERT SYSTEM ®PxSE'P Mrt/rA/..v. Y[M[x ICix PMwr d LEr.t. PoSt4—UV r r ebf x0 dvSn ro,A.-Iv i r/r rcS ./!/0,vrc _ Wl r PnnFD. SntL q 2Sf . rvxn-b ixn/rlM.x Ar SR vnxLn nafn Ovrv/w d t/Lt.r. - vxtrtl'v'vJd. M CWVx[rt'eyrrad�r dx[CIlDuN' ) n�i rei 1R➢ inPeC[A'Sn4tl 9r! Pu41 5 ®�VII Cp°f'ww[c�ro+r1x rxa wmlt wwcE nE¢[Ciwtd"vYma NE,xG.f t rOi Pxpaf Y.:.wx xI wo J/:CPSUr x/ai 5 exnxG mR OtNrxrLxoGiroxS VNnO r�erx�c.nwr�oa'Srtaw.r�ro o6ieierrrxd ooadul oW. _ _ . m xd Psueuwx r°�.x°;. n. n,mtt nEwe rw En[RinR vPwx. w!Pw.P.erx wP wpnx,d wr,n edxEaaa Ui rm i['axdPr i mr�i.rttciau:'--IPP-R wxic n'agars i¢a'.vi w u¢'drn+ur!w x sm c cw r�� nrnm xwxow rw ��iP ®��rvr wnn rw nnua,a[ ro rur mw.a io wr Pturs u ww Pu,U. xrwwuE[trw _ - ' I u�` , Y�E M" orix.rr uP°a�a sif r9"`mw 8 xnd.r`wxx°40r'nP°S�yao n m'r�mri:.ern'dx rwrE mPrcrnd m drt.rmrova.w rr.rn/�'maPEx =�^_ =� .. �I � �;/ I - f i �'�.t vEL n. +- (j"�) .— `'�m rn�n o�isrrnreumaa+�rw r canal rix ut s w!wc Ion m[OPwxremxS ®ddn nn ua tw Pno!raavvaE mwrno ro e 1as Yexr[x P! waua _ '/ I I )' °'�- vuaE•�rw tteMM mxrxxxax axx!xn �p'P / I I I Emm�wna. and mr, rr«wi¢ i•tw°0i a»ccrromxrtn' nu' ��ioron .w r uo n¢x r�"riran m'�a�ait ws < y I ILf i I iu rw°Emx[crrP'o.'r,r/n w nnw,c _ r ttdcy wnn - w;M ,. Pwn-a:vw/r rxrw naox I < I I' ' - OrCrnS MRx xGWA r u A9M xnv dx. 'r'E n xw - i" L:I DCn®art nLCaK an[n PwenC PSr xi smd wn.K�io L.xLL nw-nn�"is, r r/t u4'vK I—� 1 III siMd rd SSt as xLWwGK �wnN rt K� dnITgE AS R9MRn xe CWR'i CPwdum.wl rlxlldlx m A,P - Y nnA nn:ui KE rwu wrrSnaxs. raiuE nl naxrtrs Q xrPQ Care Id drrSwex N,PS�Nr4 abtR� rsx[Ci M UFSrnCxffnx'4t I -- N ®i vrdA(��H SxSi! �ww xaWxwx[IRS oow q'xsdx[Wwtivi Einix[nxe fan[n �P�q PmPmSc Cwn[Iw I � I - -I I' �Smd,EaGrrtns�E Pniaxe d RUC 9oE n Owxi �"�' SA DooR�lnnn�rvsx Mild d �d P lnxC CwRiP'IC / _ txrtFXw�w NJn,tl TE rxVn wxwxxVd Oo!Att OK�WMHrrtrEY PWPxrLL wd ro SMdx�`[.Bnl xi�enw m IMc'n IX,nE w ®�rxLu YaxY ca.rtn m tui Ir mla rowm r wrdwrd antn.m(r) ':- - . rsa orto�wunPrKM:.� _mmwxr.cmr unrs °'s m W Yd woxoc"�o raru"`oonz en.,.rowwcciux PEv xrtr.x. ��POWER RISER_DIAGRAM_ �� CUSTOMER ALERT SYSTEM PARTIAL PLAN nw°R1Yw:iri wraoav ro xwxswwS ��' sdE.xo wu sdE:r/f.r<. .. -------------- 3: C.ENPRAL NOTES - • O W«rw viRrwvx«xraRwtmx ua + Em[s Ataxs r xa 4uaVros. 11GHTINc symnot 1. rxrtx+«RtswxLmtt x x[PRRS to[[[aRx � • - - — snxrmx - \-e k r_, 4x�.%S.wAC CaxOx+.AxwRti rrx ES,w.xYOxvtR • - _ xCRAS.YwPxs rx0 R2K xM uSrS el� Epxuq Cmxea. tetE uxvo"iJUMrtw' - x r,.aR(3iNwla�+ r... w cx uun 05 evlAsi vw!m:+mx . _ - � � � � o u[xmaoR was Exiwc Eouxro oRa Na Exrw,xx - Y - - ox.wnv .e W. U) Z s a. [,m..•<:/w1igAi++� ,F.• _ cw I(tttn�ICNnuc NDrFs: V IuaE-xOv xas/+3w.Y.. 4E Wx[R x4x Pv^xNr a 3R++ r .. —�-- II: ° Lxx9 Ss�m / RWi U z v o 11LI ID r vox+RAaORx u« n , 4L atN ivu.3. tnwxcsJe , _ I j I x,IIL W ws°n x wa t.fNwsaxr n.nna. r x x+a rrxz rt n,r�i 4J I. �f11' , I C3 wx ..- xa[a nlnwt � �I�xa. [ �cw+m M�w - al i�R: '� � I�� I -� Nt E�-Q E - •• .-o--a ��`xaxn�a °w t/.a.a� M fn+or I 1 R - [wttl�s�%x - 1 1 _ i,� i i� . _J �„;5.�aoP N s_X1 L i Eoox Irk _ ._ 3 I i I � '\ .. Rom•°,«I..,.a / +/e,I:.a..,. aem wxw ;wP�[.wa«Pe,fV � Oz I+ e TYPICAL WIPoNG SCHEMATIC FOR. ". - ,. .• - GUTDOOR LIGH'RNG CONTROLS. a .. : )to 2 c xf/- rawm o� I[o��i E.x C�.exe rn+frxc of OPERAWNN 1 LIGHTING FLOOR PLAN uMSwiq wa rMR tC MaS+[AL'PE +A•'d _ 4rIxG © Sm%e Meats 3.�rxo+o-atn+s swra nl nmaa n[xnownc _ t;pa pm.xl ro�Je[tm W © [Mmw:/i h ev 9x S.xa zwd e.irasx) xV. iK M ARot 9W1 4i ro—•W n (a«.C['1Wrt jai�.WMvx�ronMl'«fY0( x - - .. ray M%l9m b M Ta.e -0 n. (Mw.arw lI a mn)ww+xx°`I 0. o m - - .. _ •rote m n.+ran mKurC[uaxrw srMus tm. - F,� ' PANELBOMD MOP - '* - a O i Eow 41NID - n x Evcs •' ` ' -� Q O How Eo.n ssxKn _ � .. «wm eraxw .. yy ti a u i O�J nRE NMY COxM0.vxL A ffuu 4RVa[/SCREE—E p • d Oj s Ers.wrnxRooV rs.RExt-x m Q PAN l O D 1 P uxr[D �yap0_m. w.. RCW eRFAxER tmE —SI+:ltLW rt O ) [x,xfaf NMI O Gxcur RREAxln T'vE/w! wits paREls[v,xxxr RRVx[R w/= Eats R /— ro t us,toA t+w a p t Ers.w«xRwx tro/pR wErs r+E+sE •_+wxt iaM Eucs _ O to xo + Ers.Ewmxc Gxx 0 tp fora-vw , E Ewa x+tKo Ps rai Ewo scRKo -o O rs w� wa 4R EP wo s«a <. �MrtSCxxCi[«54I + xcrrS KSi,Rl -- O + 30 COx05 xb0 x twx OStxmVnOx fRNrt 3 RCvrS fULL 4RwCE CV-3 rJ y�yJ to 30 t xr r I1ax )� Ov 93[• + p + ro t m x W- +e xcvrs.nRt.SCR+CT 'w > fM' - J aE•A KSr. 01 xCv15 iYiL s[[mC[ itk �tE�a - s IKvtS.fU.l sEm%C OO a ustOUCR.atERr JMV+ p fnl+af �'� - 30 SVMY sCRSOns un ia00 -TER rYA+ p i rRraE p 4'vAC' p m CGUWwr+wa ro 4wr1. . 23 xr[xNwrSxvuGt CF - _ - uCrtR RTxft W _ 30 SVMC "f Rtars.iG6is.KG+ [xr[xgx sixaxt[- C OJ Svrx[ _ svARC:_ TO 21 £DT..EMO.o0tx aLt,RC wxrtR C00.[R RCv+S,w«xROW - $raRE SPARC _ SrwC .. 21 - RtvTS,wOxxrlOOP - svaaf O 30 — LOAD $TEE - Qi _ 4,� CONNECTED LOADS Roo. vau ENo. TOTAC CONNECTED LOAD:9,330 VA J PNKL.p r_R. rota-cv a 1 -_ p SvrM CONNECTED LOADS 3 TOTAI :ONNCCTED LOAD:53.BJt VA rs p 1 CONNECTED L S TOTAL CONNECTED LOAD:3.200 VA OAD Oi Eatx our turf Cxmni oR—R Qx rwfaxac oun cmiAr eairt[xs ' rQ fa sx[!1 CEI fax/alEt M 4Px«LOCAro2 o i c • co cj c00 z liC7m _ .w�w D r • i I it I" �O �f r, o t - p_ 0 i SECURRY FLOOR PLAN Ire•,< w U N v2 ALARM SYSfE4 KEYEO NOTES , KFYED INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM NOTES - - S pQ.iQ rR r R x:xx�AaQ>xK F . rxp.+pC AxQnIK BdC CO>xMr,uN xne6 rpx Utl,roe xKu QI[Cripx - r •wt w mriOMt:IOwc¢NSxB>p�N uNn r�wu Jlmcmlrl wx r O,«o Q„Q IpgxMUR RIB x,� p o� rQt Q�.t u Aff�Q�QN�NAI�xtJ/C,WQwnl �a U . q&CMCN�IS M0 CC1a�ClgxS x/L W1�WxrtCNxS f0�6MIryRQ V�uttlD ., .Wipiu P.i6�Y{IM�B01[��M Q� &IX • fON�tai�RC xee110tx4 MRu. .. O NOnOC ML IOx BM Nf NNx Wkt�I b Arf. VL uN rQxRY NL NYPR • .. �- - On Ix[NNb COriRNI Vxm. YnA'mC e1LLxtE x/LL mIYFlS WM rNloe xlxlIDx Ql[Clxx Mlp: .. ,•, y O SYMUR xiO�N 4 xdGr[D.r'RV-K N'61rt.xLLON(ua - - - QIxG Y M0.Nm ip NwECICM IR MN1Y vxR. 1 O NWt,Nlx�x0 JM[Ipx®Y iCx pRxpl xxx SxIR xM xAjxQ �` V wxmm5d QnCiw MRu � . 1 )' MORwDOx WM(/07 IDN f0!xr1 (0.)MORE x(NDMD POuwD • r�. QQ (o,um omGrto RGWwartRs rzEEnnxE Oa). Ox UYO I— o �LDD O xni USED -NMR 0 OxE RFs rtaMWR III IOUE Rux Of(a)GTI-5 eIIS RER RIfORwrax �SW WICu COxxCC bxo (+7 W - ' r WM. C010WI UP rrNpFx nx.E um SNB]eaS R4xK. � _ � .�-� i] LB • � __ 0 O •ial O.wn NR GRroRt!RRu wMx,nu4 x0uxi[0 � 5...� rO9 iaERa16 E0114•lan(aR6ME0 n]YSRS).uN1 xDUx1N a [K 6 �! Q rELLr+rWE Cew.R.oEwRGlla,.u.0 uWnw - C E% ]2 I,D IWWDu K6aiio Kriw]Wxn w[Y w ort mC xIEM,fCE _ 0. - � w,rs �a/.ra rxerto nmwo W nuls I TEo fRW nW i _ A ell e d]fE IDR uWxlRc IX[WsuCxl U� �Ka.rtD OROUID auxo Duna ro IXnrw fo axon' E i = En A • � �awwwuioxrxua(x.x.)um xs Ian(x Le> - rten(s(s )� �. A m ' ro caRaEn awaui - .v COMMUMCATMS-WALL MOUNTED ". O COMMUWCpN AiS-WALL MOUNTED NOT USED 9 MDF DETAL GS-4-Od 8 MDF KEYNOTES G5-4-0d __ _ iwe..,�...wm.=a•o yr-La '�� '.a.ro. ]....]oi..om ;"" ,� /r- A /) _ _ rao.fscu�MCE)me rJ - — - , �' wr�xiw uuEs wIx.OaMIER ro auRrtx pECr140K • .. • * i GLM��Pd�ftln FW45'nVurt�R OrECpMRRS 1ISa1�D rOR �-Z . - - R: ➢d WxiC4 R.IXIYMp!WIXx�Siu-NDM roxrtLmil4li artln • _ • - OpxxEaOR P54,7116 MraAW£i]KOIICII R[a PII01' � - rvY.Poi IXRx0n0 VI9x lOGid IX PonER. - ho urtxw OGE[lCaR4w Wsi aaIX•xtx 6 xRE axMn2n. - •. - a'-caculrsRaiw�cTm°Mio�•n'Iwnull�a a W�"wrtl�a.n0� W .. - ra]rvRlxsx a uIXumx sa rxE rouowc vac L) In - - - wuIXR al�cuw I mans RCWmm� k.E.,m uoI/LaµRaLLou - .. >ro 9 I �ti w GYSM n xxaa°wEralxrt La°wvlrtEWlm acxsr' Iw.°°In«u O o n ' •.• "9` ' POwlN UK i !/M RC0�0.r diq�rtvwEn El.p M.TOR/.LL IR]ORwigx n - USunDE(S)•a4 a�i[IRSwx.i4 - /'� ONEErS.YE ELCC]RKK - _ -'. .,rt K RCCOxE gCLD rwl.lNLiY E siRv$RFCIu4D ro . 7 U F • -]IiP. D-- 0- _ '" .. r - ni 6 US(D fOR MC x0RR5a W nu[n vHp rNE YOWIM Y O d P0-,s,�--� arvuun rzRxmu C NOT ILS® - -- - - NOT USED - - CONVQJIENCE GURETS- . Ip-L�`y,� lJ 4 IRT_WOHIC 5TAl1ON GS-2-8e Y ---------------------------------- NLL YINDE IRt - u wt(R'S OfTIDE NOT USEDM wW mC 1 NOT USED —� I �schW FTME ram, Town of Barnstable do Regulatory Services v MSTABLE ASS. 'g Thomas F.Geiler,Director 163q. ♦0 ArEnp„p`lA Building Division Peter F.DiMatteo. Building Commissioner 367 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 October 30, 2001 Beaumont Sign Company Mr. Robert Paige 200 North Streets New Bedford, Ma 02740 Re: Illuminated sign for the Cotuit Post Office Dear Mr. Paige; I am compelled to inform you that your recent proposal to install an 8' illuminated sign on the Cotuit Post Office has been denied. The governing ZBA decision(2000-86) granting the expansion of a non-conforming use mandated the signage to comply with the zoning ordinance. As you are aware, this facility is located within a residential area and under 4-3.3 (7) light spillage or glare is prohibited. It is my obligation to advise you that the applicant maintains the right to petition the Board of Appeals for the necessary relief in order to proceed with the installation of the aforementioned sign. In the event that you need to discuss this matter further I can be reached directly at.508- 862-4027. Please be assured that I am available to assist you in anyway necessary. Sincerely, Robin C. Giangregorio SPR Coordinator I ' 125 4-3 .3 Prohibited signs The following signs shall be expressly prohibited in all zoning districts, contrary provisions of this ordinance notwithstanding: 1) Any sign, all or any portion of which is set in motion by movement, including pennants, banners or flags, except official flags of nations or administrative or political subdivisions thereof. 2) Any sign which incorporates any flashing, moving or intermittent lighting. 3) Any display lighting by strings of lights, including lights which outline any part of a building or which are affixed to any ornamental portion thereof, except temporary traditional decorations for religious or other recognized holidays. 4) Any sign which contains the words "Danger" or "Stop" or otherwise presents or implies the need or requirement of stopping or caution, or which is an imitation of, or is likely to be confused with any sign customarily displayed by a public authority. 5) Any sign which infringes upon the area necessary for r visibility on corner lots. 6) Any sign which obstructs any window, door, fire escape, stairway, ladder or other opening intended to provide light, air or egress from any building. 7) Any sign or lighting which casts direct light or glare upon any property in a residential or professional residential district. 8) Any portable sign, including any sign displayed 'on a stored vehicle, except for temporary political signs. 9) Any sign which obstructs the reasonable visibility of, or otherwise distracts attention from a sign maintained by a public authority. 10) Any sign or sign structure involving the use of motion pictures or projected photographic scenes or images. 11) Any sign attached to public or private utility poles, trees, signs or other appurtenances located within the right of way . of a public way. - 12) Roof signs. IKE BARNSTABLE, y MASS. 8 1639. �0 RFD MP'�A Town of Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals Decision and Notice Cotuit Post Office -Cotuit Federated Church - Appeal 2000-86 Special Permit Section 4-4.5.(2) Expansion of a Nonconforming Use Summary: Granted with Conditions Petitioner: Trustees of The Cotuit Federated Church Property Address: 45 School Street, Cotuit, MA Assessor's Map/Parcel: Map 035, Parcel 014 Zoning: RF- Residential F Zoning District Background: .The subject of this appeal is the US Post Office, Cotuit. The Trustees of the Cotuit Federated Church, who own the property have requested a Modification of Special Permit 1958-15 and/or a Special Permit in accordance with Section 4-4.5.(2)for an expansion of a pre-existing non-conforming use. The property is a 1.79 acre site located at 45 School Street, Cotuit, MA. The area is zoned Residential F Zoning District. The structure and use has the benefit of Special Permit No. 1958-15 to permit a non residential use of a post office. Prior to 1985, the site was that of an elementary school. Today, the property is developed with a one-story, 1,600 sq.ft. post office. The applicant seeks to retain the use and construct a new one-story post office structure of 3,600 sq.ft. as per plans submitted. Procedural Summary: This appeal was filed at the Town Clerk's Office and at the Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals on August 16, 2000. A public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals was duly advertised and notices sent to all abutters in accordance with MGL Chapter 40A. The hearing was opened September 27, 2000 at which time the Board granted a special permit pursuant to Section 4-4.5.(2) Expansion of a Nonconforming Use. Hearing Summary: Board Members hearing this appeal were; Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy, Ralph Copeland, Tom DeRiemer and Chairman Ron Jansson. Attorney Bernard Kilroy represented the applicant. He gave a brief description of the project and noted that the applicant would restrict the number of postal boxes to 1200, limit the hours of the post office to that at which it presently operates, and at the request of an abutter erect a fence to limit the impacts on the neighboring property. Mr. Kilroy and Ron Mycock, a Trustee of the Cotuit Federated Church, gave a brief history of the site and discussed parking, lighting and site features. Jackie Barton, an abutter, explained the traffic and use of the parking lot. The Board and Mr. Kilroy discussed the nature of the relief being requested. Public comment was requested. Ms. Barton spoke in favor of the proposal: She stated that village residents were comfortable with the proposal and requested that the hours of operation be limited and the number of boxes be limited to 1200. No one spoke in opposition. Findings of Fact: At the hearing of September 27, 2000 the Board unanimously found the following findings of fact as related to Appeal 2000-86: 1. Appeal 2000-86 of the Trustees of The Cotuit Federated Church is for a Modification of Special Permit 1958-15 and/or a special permit pursuit to Section 4-4.5.(2) Expansion of a Nonconforming Use for the Cotuit Post Office. The property is addressed as 45 School Street, Cotuit, MA, Assessor's Map 035, Parcel 014. 2. The Trustees of the Federated Church have requested a Special Permit in order to redevelop the site for a new and expanded post office building. 3. That property is a 1.79 acre site located in the center of the village area of Cotuit at 45 School Street. The area is zoned Residential F Zoning District permitting only single-family dwellings. The structure and use II has the benefit of a 1958 Special Permit No. 15 to permit a change from an elementary school building use, to a post office building and use. The property is presently developed with a one-story, 1,600 sq.ft. United States Post Office building and associated parking. 4. The applicant seeks to retain the use and construct a new one-story post office structure of 3,600 sq.ft., and parking for 32 vehicles, loading dock, a new Title V septic system and associated landscaping, lighting and site drainage. 5. An approved site plan entitled Site Plan of Land in Barnstable, MA prepared for Cotuit Post Office, School Street Cotuit, MA 02635"and dated 5-20-99 last revision date of 5-23-00 has been submitted and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. 6. The application falls within a category specifically excepted in the ordinance for a grant of a Special Permit.. 7. The proposal fulfills the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance and would not represent a substantial detriment to the public good or the neighborhood affected. 8. The Board has determined that the use, establish by a 1958 special permit, issued when the area was zoned RL- Residential Limited, has become non-conforming with subsequent residential zoning amendments that no longer would permit the use as established in 1958. Decision: Based on the findings of fact, a motion was duly made and seconded to grant a special permit pursuit to Section 4-4.5.(2) Expansion of a Nonconforming Use, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The site shall be developed as per plans submitted entitled "Site Plan of Land in Barnstable, MA prepared for Cotuit Post Office, School Street Cotuit, MA 02635'dated 5-20-99, last revision 5-23-00. 2. Appropriate signage shall be provided indicating one way(inside the two way entrance). 3. The locus shall comply with all applicable Building Codes, Town of Barnstable Board of.Health and State Fire Prevention Regulations._ 4. Signage shall conform to the sign provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. Lighting shall not exceed 16 feet in height and all luminaries shall be shielded from glare and directed only on the post office site. 6. The number of postal boxes is limited to 1,200 7. The normal hours of operations shall be from 6:00 AM to 5:30 PM, Monday to Friday, and 6:00 AM to 12:00 Noon on Saturdays, closed on Sundays. The Vote was as follows: AYE: ; Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy, Ralph Copeland, Tom DeRiemer and Chairman Ron Jansson NAY: None Ordered: Special Permit 2000-82 has been granted with conditions. This decision must be recorded at the Registry of Deeds for it to be in effect. The relief authorized by this decision must be exercised in one year. Appeals of this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 17,within twenty(20) days after the date of the filing of this decision. A copy of which must be filed in the office of the Town Clerk. Ron S. Jansson, Chairman Date Signed Linda Hutchenrider, Clerk of the Town of Barnstable, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, hereby certify that twenty(20)days have elapsed since the Zoning Board of Appeals filed this decision and that no appeal of the decision has been filed in the office of the Town Clerk. Signed and sealed this day of under the pains and penalties of perjury. Linda Hutchenrider, Town Clerk 2 Oct ,29 01 05: 20p Beaumont Sign CO 5089933230 p. 1 (�cjl L' B e a u In,al MWft ont 6�71 11 SJf ON9 firer,. S gns of Quaeity" 200 North Street, New Bedford, Massachusetts 02740 Tel: 506-990-1701 • Fax:506-993-3230 Toll Free; 1-800-474-1701 Town of Barnstable--Attn, Robin Froam Bob Paige Fom 508-790-6230 pages. 6 Phi Date October 29, 2001 0 Urgem 0 For glewsw El iP1e800 Corimaent ❑Meese Reply 0 please Recycle o Commw tis: Robin Here are the plans for the 'Lighted cabinet sign far the Cotuit Post Office as we discussed. Please review and let me know if they will be denied. Thank you, Bob Paige s .�. f . ♦ __-�— -' ., i fin. ._ yw � r s m ."4-xi c' i_�d �.'Y 4h�_� S i�•n-t -,r�ya*�"'i �',f`f�A'�� v✓'��"4'-v-YS'+�� -. - _ �' ,y�- s- fir•:r�'G`.�"."„G .r''. rr _ _ �r W -- O O In D U C L7 4.) C E Ip W - m !Z N N - DRAWN BY: S.SMITH SCALE:NTS 1TTLE:FRONT EIEVATON 1 O ®� 5�5 HaR Avenue E.P.O.BOX Z36 1 of __—.. �__ ___ _.— �_ Renr*=.0nprp K 4A3 DATE:17/10/01 REVISION:NCO DATE -MSS ACC.EXE -4 =FMNMAR3RLD Tel(888)830-8030 FILE:Ccnuit,MS.wr� ---- O SIGHS lac FaX(613)432_8578 Than dwirNe.IncMb IeUM�CN e�dli�er�s eM engNmrinp(Nero Dro orgviyd TrenmwtlFWf Inc AM eM4 .— 01 Fvoou rw.'oo ^�'e"owou�a.��v�oa.eee tar menuladurbq wuiONP =wnn.n eus.araroan►o.,,TrWgy-w S"p.r. FINAL e PAGE: N em—c�:aa,zlyo+ U 0 Q o N C7 cl El F-1-E-- cn m m ROR 42 - - Q N l!) ®® COTUfT MPO DRAWN BY: W SCALE: NTS --- TITLE--ELEVATION 2 of 5 ® 555 Nan nvenuo E?.O.spx 236 48 SCHOOL STREET —_- 555 HBD RmfmK Ont W ,V W COTUIT MA 02635 DAFE- 3A 0/01 REVISION: 00 DATE: TWS .� ACC.EXEC. 1TRANSiWj3M0 ToL-(888)830-803D FR E: TWS6624.DWG 6614 0 SIGNS INC, .F—(613)432-8578 rmoouewvp+.ors.,e � ,•� yd„ �asa,o..=wa+� FINAL PAGE: 0 cwa�i ra-ao snom.o om3 azww N U 0 ct N (D H d L et � Q bc- 0 cn RN-3� �.AN-1 - �• N O - O COTUIr MPO -- — ORAWN FT": J Ltm W WIALE: N TS nlLE:ELEVATION 3 be _ 5 - IiWS MB/Ave/8re G P.O.BUX 278 48 SCHOOt_STAEE7 —.___..— _. _.._-__.. ____ _.__T fi ft w O.UM K7V 4" COTVfr MA 026W AC.C.EXEC:. s OATE: 3/IO/Ol ISION: 0 L 0 I DATE: 9-• W RLD T i.oas a3o-w3U /` ----- _-Ht`✓—'_--.---'---.-- ) FILE: 'fW56L'2d,UWG SIQNS lNG Fcuc(613)432�578 '6624 il>ht�Ctew.�,M}uea te>nicel nptm�kYb onY wW+n�q tam.ara ow �rf�N d liu�:�r}Y�:ilprn tc artl end eu oe...v.oa.ow..no�+w.wN,aw.m�.w�u...�u.ew�s r.oa.,..mm mmaes��v,�x�.x.>ww s�ro. FINAL PAGE: ' EAnm�..Oaten.YtM Uj i Clt Rl LO to 'S c� 0 11Ra�n Pt�st Odloa - . _ _ry LJ Ln CD Lo Ra-! �w �m '— 1 ) . LO O COTLIT MPJ DRAWN OY: _ J.LI_t2C`__ SCALE: N78 __ r Sys Hen Avenue E P0 .O.BOX 23a 48 SCHOOL SIFEET TI,rLF._LEVAT10r.1 �- 9 Reniiow,Os�W KIV 4A3 COTUIT MA V2635 DATE_ 3/}pp1 AEVIStON' DO f]ATE: -lfRfl 5WORL(O Tel.:{E88)030.W30 ACC.IXEC. TJVS SIGNS iN Fa 613 7 —G 432 85 a( ) I Pn_E. TW;;6R21.1JWC D,2a FWAL PAGE: • o _ o n ' ry cD o - \\Ffocl ' ry Lid i I� M� (D —"— ft 00 ,.. 17' o f Ln o _ r f ( T71T MPD - DPo4WN 8 J.L.BAAAW -SCALE: NT S TTILE SITE PLAN ^�<si 9 I as3 -'f--- '- -----'- --- -_- - - R-A—G.aarl a eo.eox23a COTIJTMA Wfa'i.5- 1 'u'� DATE. ;3110NS A{'-VISION. . ReMe9v�,GrtarW KN l7w 9RdlNS{A/M C) r9i.:(eea>maan7o —! FILE: TWu6624.DWG 6b„4 'SIGNS INC. Fo�r.(6t!)472.8578 C �.»o�ewrr..rwovaw�aaaynwav e - _ - _ •,�,a,ancea*r> •m=�••• FINAL. PPGE: Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services Thomas F.Geiler,Director. Mess. 9`bpr039.�a Building Division Peter F.DiMatteo. Building Commissioner 367 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 w PLEASE FORWARD THE ATTACHED PAGES) TO: TO: e = ATTN: FAX NO: FROM: DATE: PAGE(S): 'j� (EXCLUDING COVER SHEET) , TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME: 02/23/1995 02:38 NAME: FAX 918028624926 TEL DATEJIME 02/'23 02: 35 FAX NO./NAME 915089933230 DURATION 00:02: 27 PAGE(S) 05 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD ECM v � WE Tp�� The Town of Barnstable " rsrAs Office of Town Manager 9 MASS. i639- A�� 367 Main Street, Hyannis MA 02601 ED MA't Office: 508-862-4610 John C. Klimm,Town Manager Fax: 508-790-6226, Joellen J.Daley,Assistant Town Manager MEMORANDUM TO: \`Robert Smith, Town Attorney N Peter DiMatteo, Building Commissioner FR: John C. Klim DT: September 26, 2001 RE: Cotuit Post Office—Claim of Excessive Noise I am sending you this information. Please respond back to me. Thank you. JCK:smo ZISSON AND VEARA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 865 PROVIDENCE HIGHWAY DEDHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 02026-6825 RICHARD L. ZISSON TEL t781) 329-I I10 EDWARD E. VEARA FAX (781) 329-5119 JILL J. BROFSKY E. JAMES VEARA 82.8 MAIN STREET-BOX 2031 PAUL V. BENATTI OLD KINGS HIGHWAY SARAH A. TURANO-FLORES DENNIS, MASSACHUSETTS 02638-0043 JOHN R. COSTELLO TEL (508) 385-6031 BENJAMIN E. ZEHNDER FAX (508) 385-6914 LORI CURTIS KRUSELL ALANNA D. BRAVMAN LISA M. WESTERVELT• .ALSO ADMITTED IN NEW YORK September 20, 2001 John Klimm, Town Manager Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Barnstable, MA 02601 Re: Cotuit Post Office-Claim of Excessive Noise Dear Mr. Klimm: I am writing to you on behalf of John Cira who resides at 61 School Street, Cotuit. I note in the past you have met with Mr. Cira concerning his being aggrieved by the excessive noise emanating from the air conditioning units installed at the Cotuit Post Office. Mr. Cira has awaited the installation of a fence to see if that would help mitigate and abate the noise,but that has not been the case. - We finely believe that the noise is in violation of the provisions of 310 CMR 7.10 and the Town of Barnstable anti-noise regulation. The placement of the air conditioning units may also be a deviation from the plans accepted and approved by the Town's Zoning Board of Appeals for the expansion of a non-conforming use. We stand ready to have our experts in environmental and industrial acoustics from Acentech, Inc. located in Cambridge come to Mr. Cira's site and perform noise monitoring to establish the requisite scientific basis to substantiate a claim to enjoin violation of the Town's anti-noise by-law and 310 CMR 7.10. However,before embarking on that endeavor, I firmly believe that the 7'own's assistance in negotiating a less acrimonious and far-less expensive resolution short of litigation should be pursued and exhausted. ZISSON AND VEARA John Klimm September 20, 2001 Page 2 To that end, I am writing to request that a meeting be established with yourself, the Town's Building Inspector, and the owner/operators of the Cotuit Post Office, namely the trustees of the Cotuit Federated Church to. explore their installation of acoustical products to maximize noise reduction by combining sound absorber and noise barrier materials. We have been provided literature about those materials, and a preliminary quotation for installation at a price of less than S3,000.00. Again, I firmly believe tha-, your assistance with the parties is in the best interests of all involved in pursuing a possible resolution as I have outlined above. I hope you are amenable to this request for assistance and look forward to convening with all parties in short order. Thank you. Cordially, E J Ti s Veara EJV/lmb cc: John Cira Code of Massachusetts Regulations Titles 300-399 Page 1 of 3 Code of Mass. Regulations Titles 300-399 To .. 100-199CMR CMR SECTION SUBJECT 200-299 CMR 300-399 CMR Environmental Affairs ;,K r VO00 301 CMR Executive Office of 400-499 CMR Environmental Affairs 600-699 CMR 301 CMR 10 Densely Developed Areas 600-699 CMR 301 CMR 11 MEPA 00-799 CMR 309 CMR Board of Registration of 800_899 CMR Hazardous Waste Cleanup 900-999 CMR Professionals 309 CMR 1-9 Hazardous Waste Cleanup Professionals 310 CMR Department of Environmental Protection 310 CMR 7 Air Pollution Control 310 CMR 7 Appendix Appendices A and B 310 CMR 9 Mass. Waterways 310 CMR 10 Wetlands Protection 310 CMR 15 TITLE 5: State Environmental Code 310 CMR 16 Site Assignment for Solid Waste Facilities 310 CMR 19 Solid Waste Management 310 CMR 22 Drinking Water 310 CMR 27 Underground Injection Control Program 310 CMR 36 Water Management 310 CMR 40 Mass. Contingency Plan 310 CMR 40.1600 Oil and Hazardous Materials List 310 CMR 45 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund 314 CMR Division of Water Pollution Control 314 CMR 4 Surface Water Quality 314 CMR 9 Water Quality Cert. 330 CMR Department of Food and Agriculture R3� CMR 2 Imnnrtation of nncrS http://www.lawlib.state.m'a.us/300-399cmr.html 9/28/01 � w 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 7.09: continued (3) No person responsible for an area where construction or demolition has taken place shal cause, suffer, allow, or permit particulate emissions therefrom to cause or contribute to a condition of air pollution by failure to seed,pave, cover,wet,or otherwise treat said area to prevent excessive emissions of particulate matter. (4) No person shall cause,suffer,allow,or permit the handing,transportation,or storage of any material in a mamer that results or may result in emissions therefrom which cause or contribute to a condition of air pollution. (5) No persons responsible for any construction or demolition of a structure that contains friable asbestos material shall fail to comply with 310 CMR 7.09(2) and 310 CMR 7.02. (Nations Emission Standards for Hazardous Pollutants) (6) No person shall cause,suffer,allow,or permit the operation of mechanized street sweeping equipment that is not equipped with a suitable dust collection or dust suppression system which is maintained in good operating condition aid is operated continuously while the street sweeping equipment is in use to prevent conditions of air pollution. (7) 310 CMR 7.09(1)through 7.09(4)and 7.09(6)are subject to the enforcement provisions specified in 310 CMR 7.52. 7.10: U Noise (1) No person owning,leasing,or controlling a source of sound shall willfully,negligently,or through failure to provide necessary equipment, service,or maintenance or to take necessary precautions cause,suffer,allow,or permit unnecessary emissions from said source of sound that may cause noise. (2) 310 CMR 7.10(1)shall pertain to,but shall not be limited to,prolonged unattended sounding of burgular alarms,construction and demolition equipment which characteristically emit sound but which may be fitted and accommodated with equipment sach as enclosures to suppress sound or may be operated in a manner so as to suppress sound,suppressable and preventable industrial and commercial sources of sound,and other man-made sounds that cause noise. (3) 310 CMR 7.10(1)shall not apply to sounds emitted during and associated with: (a) parades, public gatherings, or sporting events, for which permits have been issued provided that said parades,public gatherings,or sporting events in one city or town do not cause noise in another city or town; (b) emergency police,fire,and ambulance vehicles; (c) police,fire,and civil and national defense activities; (d) domestic equipment such as lawn mowers and power saws between the hours of 7:00 A.M.and 9:00 P.M. (4) 310 CMR 7.10(1)is subject to the enforcement provisions specified in 310 CMR 7.52. 7.11: U Transportation Media (1) Motor Vehicles. (a) All motor vehicles registered in the Commonwealth shall comply with pertineh regulations of the Registry of Motor Vehicles relative to exhaust and sound emissions. (b) No person shall cause,suffer,allow,or permit the unnecessary operation of the engine of a motor vehicle while said vehicle is stopped for a foreseeable period of time in excess of five minutes. 310 CMR 17.11 shall not apply to: 1. vehicles being serviced,provided that operation of the engne is essential to the proper repair thereof,or l 5/29/98 (Effective 5/1/98)-corrected 310 CMR-244 DiMatteo Peter From: DiMatteo Peter Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:17 PM To: Klimm, John; Smith, Robert; Weil, Ruth Subject: Cotuit Post Office/Cotuit Federated Church Dear John, In response to your memo and the letter from Mr. John Cira's attorney, here are the details and history. As you recall, this series of complaints goes back to early summer. The Cotuit Federated Church is the owner and developer of the post office property. They lease the facility to the post office. We met with church representatives and attempted to mediate a solution for Mr. Cira. In summary, there were two complaints from Mr. Cira, and other neighbors, of the post office. The first issue was the noise emanating from the two AC condensing units and an alleged deviation from the ZBA special permit. The second, later on, was the lighting intrusion into his home from the wall pacs and parking lot pole lights.The Building Division attempted to resolve the issues between Mr. Cira and the Cotuit Federated Church since the end of June 2001, even though we did not think we had the legal jurisdiction to do so with regard to the noise. The police referred that matter to Health and they referred it to us. I found that there was no basis to establish a violation of the ZBA special permit regarding the noise. The Barnstable General Ordinance (copied below) does not deal with the type of noise genereated by the post office. The ordinance is written specifically to control noise from stereos, etc. The reference to 310 CMR 7.10 (copy below) does not appear to apply to the noise that is generated by the AC condensing units. I did find that the lights did create a problem and were a violation of ordinances. A letter was written to the church to to order corrections. Here is a chronological history of the facts as I know them: 1. The ZBA special permit#2000-82 was granted, with conditions, on October 6, 2000. 2. On or about March, 2001, there was a storm washout in the originaly proposed location of the AC condensing units whereby Elbert Ulshoeffer, the interim Building Commissioner, approved the relocation of the AC condensing units to a point 15' (but withing the building envelope setbacks from the property line) closer to the Iproperty of Mr. Cira. 3. The building construction reached a point of substantal completion near the end of May, 2001. 4. The first letter from Mr. Cira was sent to the ZBA, dated June 28, 2001. A second letter was sent to the building division, dated July 2, 2001. Both letters complained of the noise from the AC condensing units and alleged violations of the special permit and ordinances. 5. A lettter, dated June 29, 2001, was received from Mr. Scales of the Cotuit Federated Church stating that the church would put up a wood fence to alleviate the AC condenser noise and that if that didn't work, they would take the next step. 6. Two additional letters were received from other neighbors complaining about the lights and the noise. 7. On July 6, 2001, I went to Cotuit to view first hand the site conditions and photograph the AC condensing units. 8. On July 9, 2001, I received a phone call from Mr. Cira regarding the problems. 9. Mr. Cira delivered soundproofing materials to the offfice on July 10, 2001. 10. On Julyl 18, 2001, I sent a letter to Mr. Cira informing him of my decision that I could find no basis to establish a violation of the the ZBA special permit for the noise. 11. On July 23, 2001, a meeting was held w/Klimm,Barton, Scales, Geiler, McKean, DiMatteo 12. On July 25, 2001, Mr. Cira wrote another letter regarding the lighting levels from the post office. ,13. On July 31. 2001, Tom McKean and I visited the Cotuit post office and Mr. Cira. 14. On August 14, I called Mr. Cira regarding update on fence. 15. On August 30, 2001, I wrote Mr. Scales a letter re violations to zoning ordinance and ZBA decisiion on lights. 16 Mr. Cira called Sept. 14 re updates - still noise, fence up, no light shields. 1 i 17. I called Mr. Scales Sept. 14 re progress. he said gate up, lights to be changed. 7.10: U Noise (1)No person owning, leasing, or controlling a source of sound shall willfully, negligently, or through failure to provide necessary equipment, service, or maintenance or to take necessary precautions cause, suffer, allow, or permit unnecessary emissions from said source of sound that may cause noise. (2) 310 CMR 7.10(l) shall pertain to,but shall not be limited to,prolonged unattended sounding of burgular alarms, construction and demolition equipment which characteristically emit sound but which may be fitted and accommodated with equipment such as enclosures to suppress sound or may be operated in a manner so as to suppress sound, suppressable and preventable industrial and commercial sources of sound, and other man-made sounds that cause noise. (3) 310 CMR 7.10(1) shall not apply to sounds emitted during and associated with: (a)parades,public gatherings, or sporting events, for which permits have been issued provided that said parades,public gatherings, or sporting events in one city or town do not cause noise in another city or town; (b) emergency police, fire, and ambulance vehicles; (c)police, fire, and civil and national defense activities; (d) domestic equipment such as lawn mowers and power saws between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. (4) 310 CMR 7.10(l) is subject to the enforcement provisions specified in 310 CMR 7.52. ARTICLE XXI. ANTI-NOISE REGULATION Section 1. It shall be unlawful for any person or persons occupying or having charge of any building, dwelling, structure, premises, shelter, boat or conveyance or any part thereof in the town, to cause or suffer to allow any unnecessary, loud, excessive or unusual noises in the operation of any radio, phonograph or other mechanical or electronic sound making device or instrument, or reproducing device or instrument, or in the playing of any band, orchestra, musician or group of musicians, or in the use of any device to amplify the aforesaid, or the making of loud outcries, exclamations or other loud or boisterous noises or loud and boisterous singing by any person or group of person or in the use of any device to amplify the aforesaid noise, where the noise is plainly audible at a distance of one hundred fifty (150) feet from the building, dwelling, structure, premises, shelter, boat or conveyance in which or from which it is produced. The fact that the noise is plainly audible at a distance of one hundred fifty (150) feet from the building, dwelling, structure, premises, shelter, boat or conveyance from which it originates shall constitute Prima Facie evidence of a violation of this ordinance. Section 2. It shall be unlawful for any person or persons being present in or about any building, dwelling, structure, premises, shelter, boat or conveyance or any part thereof, other than that section of any establishment licensed under Chapter 138 of the General Laws, who, shall cause or suffer or countenance any loud, unnecessary, excessive or unusual noises, including any loud, .unnecessary, excessive or unusual noises in the operation of any radio, phonograph, or other mechanical or electronic sound making device, or instrument or reproducing device or instrument or in the playing of any band, orchestra, musician or group of musicians, or the making of loud outcries, exclamations or other loud or boisterous noises or loud and boisterous singing by any person or group of persons, or in the use of any device to amplify the aforesaid noise, where the aforesaid noise is plainly. audible at a distance of one hundred and fifty feet. from the building, dwelling, structure, premises, shelter, boat or conveyance in which or from which it is produced. The fact that the noise is plainly audible at a distance of one hundred and 2 I � � fifty feet from the building, dwelling, structure, premises, shelter boat or conveyance from which it originates shall constitute Prima Facie evidence of a violation of this ordinance. Any person shall be deemed in-violation of this ordinance, who shall make, or aid, or cause, or suffer, or countenance, or assist in the making of the aforesaid and described improper noises, disturbance, breach of the peace, and the presence of any person or persons in or about the building, dwelling, structure, premises, shelter, boat or conveyance or any part thereof during a violation of this ordinance shall constitute Prima Facie evidence that they are a countenance to such violation. Section 3. It shall be unlawful for any person while in control of any motor vehicle in the Town of Barnstable to cause any unnecessary, loud, excessive, or unusual noise in the operation of the motor vehicle. The fact that the noise is plainly audible at a distance of one hundred fifty (150) feet from the motor vehicle from which it originates shall constitute Prima Facie evidence of a violation of this ordinance. Section 4. The owner of any building, dwelling, structure, premises, shelter, boat or conveyance which is let, rented or leased shall provide any and all tenants, lessees and sublessees with a copy of this ordinance. Section 5. Any person violating the provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed two hundred ($200.00) dollars for each offense. Adopted September 3, 1965. Approved September 29, 1965. Amended May 18; 1976. Approved September 13, 1976. Adoption of Section 3. Amended November 5, 1988. Approved March 10, 1989. Rescission of old text. Adoption of new text. 3 r _ �T r Town of Barnstable BAMSr,BLL Regulatory Services 9�b039. �� Thomas F. Geiler,Director. '°rfc Hw+ Building Division Peter F.DiMatteo Building Commissioner 367 Main Street,Hyannis, MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 August 30, 2001 Mr. Robert Scales P.O. Box 1384 Cotuit Federated Church Cotuit, Ma 02635 Re: Cotuit Post Office Dear Mr. Scales Based on a personal visit to the Cotuit Post Office and the residence of Mr.John Cira on the night of August 24, 2001, I find that the Post Office has violated section 4-2.5(5)of the Barnstable Zoning Ordinance and the ZBA#2000-86 decision item#5. The wall pak lights under the soffit on the Westerly side of the post office illuminate the interior of the Cira residence, as do the parking lot lights in front of the Post.Office. The above conditions will be exacerbated this fall when the trees lose their leaves. You are hereby ordered to immediately correct this situation, as requested previously, so that no lights or glare illuminate the Cira residence or other abutters. . Tha in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, - Peter F. DiMatteo Building Commissioner Certified Mail 7000 052.0 0021 8281 3995 PDM/ek ... cps P. O.BOX PM OpCOTUIT,MA 02635 _`} 508-428-8623 Q J 1T„AUu cl J M Mr. Peter Dimatteo Building Commissioner Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 d'I1'III Ill 111Y id.11'fill,I1-M111111111.1I Ill Ill i r j CON P.O.BOX 771 COTUIT,MA 02635 508-428-8623 FINE ART/RESEARCH (n c. t I AEG 2 0 200, ey P.O.BOX 771 COTUIT,MA 02635 508-428-8623 FINE ART/RESEARCH August 16, 2001 Mr. Robert Scales ` 30 Captain Samadrus Rd Cotuit, MA 02635 Dear Mr. Scales, I have just spoken at length with Ron Mycock and Peter Dimatteo and am informed of 'your building committee's inten ( tion to proceed with the plan to erect a simple stockade fence around the air conditioning units in an attempt to deaden the sound. As you know, I have conferred with the town health and building inspectors and it is their opinion, as well as mine from the beginning of their use, that a simple wooden fence will only serve to exacerbate the problem. It is also the opinion of a professional acoustical engineering firm in Texas _who specialize in sound deadening structures designed specifi- cally for air conditioning applications: They stressed the importance of having an acoustically efficient top or ceiling directly above the units. They guarantee a sizeable reduction in the decible level. I did give this information to Peter Dimatteo and he has stated that he gave this information to you. Mr. Dimatteo informed me that you reported the cost to the -church to erect the simple stockade fence will be in the vicinity of $1700. An acoustical structure produced by the Texas firm, specifically designed for the units in operation at the Cotuit Post Office would run between $2000 and $3000. , They have a two week delivery time. I and some of my neighbors i are willing to absorb a portion of the extra. post 4of the professionally designed acoustical structure. I' personally would be willing to install or aid in the installation of this structure. I will reiterate that :the quali- ty of life of myself and my children is my primary concern here and I do desire to live in harmony with my neighbors. Noise problems are legally disclosable factors in determining the value of property and any diminish- ment of value of the real property of this neighborhood is a serious con- cern to myself and my neighbors. Therefore, we are fully prepared to seek recompense in a court of law for any such loss of quality of life or diminished property value. I prefer to focus my energy and resources on solving the problems amicably. I am confident that if we focus on seeking a professional and appropriate solution to the problem and maintain an attitude of open communication, we can avoid the involvement of litigation. I request the opportunity to discuss the specifics of this proposal. with your committee at or ,before your next board meeting. I urge you to please respond to the proposal set forth herein in a timely manner. I and my children have lived with this nuisance daily for over two months now, The units commence operation between 5 and 7 AM and do not shut off until after 5PM. This has been 'a source of great stress to me and my children. I have been very patient. I must' now seek a solution. Respectfully, John Cira cc: Mr. Peter Dimatteo Mr. Ron Mycock Mr. Michael Crossen, Attorney at Law a -sauc 16 01 02: 53p BLT 5087713463 p. 1 BLT(508) 771-2W6 La 'bjiv Fcmc �6 U61() IPA From � 1 I Fame � �j ' /:ram PIOX: 508-771-3463 Phone: Re: CC. J Urgent ❑For Review ❑Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑Please Recycle e Comments: ! Y 4S, Tbl)o .J i 1, -Rug 16 01 02: 53p BLT 5087713463 p. 2 District Manager Southeast New England Performance Cluster 0UNITEDSWES POSTAL SERVICE August 10, 2001 Mr. John Cira P.O. Box 771 Cotuit, MA 02635 Dear Mr. Cira: Thank you for your letter of July 25 regarding the exterior lighting at the Cotuit Post Office, The ZHA requirements you enclosed were helpful to us in investigating this. issue. VVe asked the Cotuit Federated Church to look at the direction and the height of the lights to see if they were in conformance with the ZBA directive. It is the responsibility of the Owner (Cotuit Federated Church)to make sure the lights are correctly in place. The representative of the church states that the lights do, in fact, conform to the mandates set by the ZBA; we are, therefore, at a loss as to hour to make further changes. We are concerned that you have an issue with the exterior lights. If you have any suggestions to offer, we would be glad to consider them. ASipre Don Marshall District Manager 24 CORUSS STREET PROVIDENCE,R102904.9998 401-276.6950 Fix: 401-270.6867 MOV Physics Applied--Noise Wall Basics Page 1 of 4 a! Basic Noise Wall Facts71 by Mike O'Connor w 311 , This simple conceptual sketch illustrates several important facts about the performance of outdoor noise walls. On it are shown 'rays' which represent types of paths that the sound can take between the source and receptor. We will discuss each type of path in turn. One path is shown going straight through the wall. The sound that goes directly through the wall is usually called the transmitted sound. Another path that the sound can and will take is a bent path over the top of the wall. That's right, some of the sound will be deflected downward as it goes over the wall. Sound that does that is said to have been diffracted. Finally, there is reflected sound which bounces off of the wall. Not shown on the sketch is absorbed sound. The term refers to the elimination of sound via conversion of the energy that is in the sound into heat. Some amount of absorption occurs on each of the three types of paths which are shown. http://Ianminds.com/moc/wall.html 7/31/01 MO'C Physics Applied--Noise Wall Basics Page 2 of 4 �y The percentages which are shown on the sketch pertain to the energy content in the sound. We will first discuss the relative importance of each of the three kinds of paths. We will then add up the percentages to get, on each side of the roadway, the total energy content of the noise from the automobile, as affected by the wall. We will then determine the overall significance of the tallied effects of the wall, especially in regard to loudness. Note first that the transmitted sound is shown as amounting to a virtually negligible 1% of all of the sound that goes out from the passing car toward the house. For most walls, the amount transmitted through the wall would be even less than that. Thus we can almost always ignore the transmitted sound. Likewise, no allowance has been made for absorption because the only walls that absorb a significant amount of sound are those that have deliberately been made to be absorptive, such as by covering them with dense absorptive materials. Sound is absorbed by the atmosphere,but over such a short distance of a hundred feet or so, as is depicted here, the absorption by the atmosphere is also negligible. Thus, at the residence we are left with the diffracted sound and a small contribution from the transmitted sound, which add up to just 10% of the incident sound. (Of course 100% represents all of the sound that would reach the receptor at the house were there no wall at all. We're calling that the 'incident' sound.) . Across the way, on the left side of the sketch, we see that the reflected sound is not the 91% of the incident sound which hits the wall minus the 1% that is transmitted through the wall, but quite a bit less—just 50%. The reduction from 90% to 50% is due to the fact that sound is diminished with distance it spreads out from a source (simply because of the spreading out) and the distance from the car to the wall and back across the roadway is greater than the direct distance from the car to http://lanminds.com/moc/wall.html 7/31/01 MOV Physics Applied--Noise Wall Basics Page 3 of 4 the left side of the roadway. So, receptors on the left side of the roadway would receive 150% of the sound that would be incident there without the wall. To summarize the results thus far, we have found that, with a wall, the receptor at the house on the right side of the road would receive only 10% of the noise that would be there if there were no wall at all; on the left side of the road any receptors there would be exposed to 150% of the noise that would be there if there were no wall at all. We now turn to the most important question, that of the significance of these findings. It's important to understand that one doesn't hear sound as having a loudness that is simply proportionate to the amount of energy in the sound, the way that the price of a new roadway may be found to be approximately proportional to its length. For example, if a sound is changed so that it has, either half(or twice) the energy that it had before, then that would amount to just a noticeable decrease (or increase) in loudness. It would take a 10-fold decrease (or increase) in the amount of energy in the sound to halve (or double) the loudness. Thus, at the house on the right side of the road passing automobiles would sound approximately half as loud with the wall as they would without the wall; receptors on the left side of the road would sense a small and barely noticeable increase in loudness due to the wall. (Opinions about the percentage increase in loudness that is produced by a 50% increase in energy content are likely differ substantially from one person to another,but it is to be expected that most would acknowledge an increase in loudness of roughly 10 to 15%.) http://lanminds.com/moc/wall.html 7/31/01 i MO'C Physics Applied--Noise Wall Basics Page 4 of 4 Readers should understand that this is only an example. The actual performance of noise walls differs from site to site due to a number of factors: the height of the wall; the amount of background noise from sources other than vehicles on the roadway; the amount of heavy truck traffic on the roadway; the horizontal extent of the wall; the distances from the car to the wall and from the wall to the receptor; and, the elevations of the roadway and the receptor relative to the top of the wall.9[ Home Prq cts Noise Walls Clients CAD.D etnail http://lanminds.com/moc/wall.html 7/31/01 I McKean Thomas From: McKean Thomas To: Geiler Tom Cc: DiMatteo, Peter Subject: AC Noise Date: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:47PM listened to similar ac unit set-ups at 3 locations: (a) Citizens Bank, Hyannis Rotary, (b) Bornstein Building, 319 Barnstable Road, and (c) Dental Associates 197 Barnstable Road. (a) At Citizens Bank, there are two ac units on a cement pad behind the bulding. The ac unit at this location was relatively quiet; only a small "clacking" noise could be heard at a close distance. However, only one of the two units ,was operating. (b)There were three units at this location within a wooden 4 feet fenced area set-back approximately twenty feet behind the building. I could hear a loud "clacking"noise from approximately 65 feet away. (c) The dentist building had two ac units on cement pads beside the building. I could hear a similar "buzzing" noise from 30 to 40 feet away. This buzzing noise was at approximately the same noise level asthe AC units located at the Cotuit Post Office. Page 1 la u � � � �_: �— C.� � - � 1 _____� � � � �'� S'� �� ¢ �� '7-,7' °F1HE r° Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services * * BARNSTABLE, " Thomas F.Geiler,Director 9 MASS. �A i639. g `0 Buildin Division Peter F.DiMatteo Building Commissioner 367 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 PLEASE FORWARD THE ATTACHED PAGE(S) TO: TO: Jeffrey Sagerman,Monigle Assoc. Regarding Cotuit Post Office FAX NO: 303-321-7939 303-388-9358 x233 FROM: Kathy Maloney,Administrative Assistant DATE: July 30, 2001 PAGE(S): (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) 115 13) Signs advertising products, sales, events or activities which are tacked;- painted or otherwise attached to poles, benches, -barr6ls;-buildings;"'traffic signal boxes, posts, trees, sidewalks, curbs, rocks and windows regardless of application, except as otherwise construction or app specifically P provided for herein. 14) Signs .,on _or__over Town .property, except as authorized by the Building Commissioner for temporary signs for non-profit, civic, educational, 'charitable and. municipal agencies. 15) Signs that will obstruct the visibility of another sign which has the required permits and is otherwise in compliance with this ordinance. 16) Off-premises signs except for "Ladder Signs" as otherwise provided for herein. 17) Any sign, picture, publication, display of explicit graphics or language or other advertising which is distinguished or characterized by emphasis depicting or describing sexual conduct or sexual activity as defined in MGL Ch. 272 , § 31, displayed in windows, or upon any building, or visible from sidewalks, walkways, the air, roads, highways, or a public area. (#17 was added by a 10 Yes 1 No - Roll Call vote of the Barnstable Town Council on 614198 as part of item 98-064) 4-3 .4 Determination of Area: 1) The area of the sign shall be considered to include all lettering, wording and accompanying designs and symbols, together with the background whether open or enclosed, on which they are displayed. 2) The area of signs painted upon or applied to a building shall include all lettering, wording and accompanying designs or symbols together with any background of a different color than the finish material or the building face. 3) When a sign consists of individual letters or symbols attached to or painted on a surface, wall or window, the area shall be that of the smallest rectangle which encompasses all of the letters and symbols. 4) Only one side of -a double-faced sign shall be counted in computing the area of that sign. 5) For the purposes of these regulations, the area of .a building face' or wall shall be calculated by using a height of no more L. 116 t , v3.6 Si ns in Professional Residential Districts: 1) One (1) sign giving the name 'of the occupant or other i identification of a permitted use in a professional residential zone may be permitted. Such signs shall be no more than twelve (12) square feet in area and shall not extend more than eight (8) feet above the ground. 2) Any illuminated sign must comply with the provisions of Section 4-3. 5 herein. 3.7 Signs in Business Limited Business, Highway Business Urban siness and Service and Distribution Districts and the SD-1 Service and stribution District: 15 nded b . 9 on 7 99)es vote of the Town Council / / 1) Each business may be allowed a total of t wo (2) signs. • ,i 2) The maximum height of any free-standing sign will be ten (10) feet, except that a height of up to twelve (12) feet may be I I allowed by the Building Commissioner if it is determined that , the additional height will be in keeping with the scale of the building and will not detract from the appearance or safety of the area, and will not obscure existing signs thatl� conform to these regulations and have a Town permit. 3) The total square footage for all signs of each business shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the area of the building wall I; facing a public way or one hundred (100) square feet, whichever is the lesser amount. 4) Only one free-standing sign is allowed per business, which I . . may not exceed half the allowable size as permitted in this section. . 5) One projecting overhanging sign may be permitted per business IL �IIi sign provided that in lieu of either a free-standing or wall ;) the sign does not exceed six (6) square feet in area, is no higher than ten (10) feet from the ground at its highest point and is secured and located so as to preclude its becoming a hazard to the public. Any sign projecting onto J' Town must have adequate public liability insurance property coverage and proof of such insurance must be provided to the Building Commissioner prior to the granting of a permit for such sign. 6) Incidental business signs, indicating hours of operation, credit cards accepted, business affiliations and the like, etc. , shall be permitted so long as the total area of all such signs for a single business does not exceed the provisions of this section. �, I �1 117 I% , 7) When a business property is located on two or more public ; I ways, the Building Commissioner may allow a second free- standing sign, so long as the total square footage of all signs for a single business does not exceed the provisions of this section. 8) When two or more businesses are located on a single lot, onl that lot, excepty one free-standing sign shall be allowed for � ! as provided in this section, in addition to one wall or !� awning sign for each business . If approved by the Building � . Commissioner, the one free-standing sign can include the names of all businesses on the lot . 9) One awning or canopy sign may be �i iness i lieu of the allowable wall or free-standinngpsign, sub jectnto approval by the Building Commissioner. `I� I 10) Window signs indicating "sale" are permitted so long as the total area of all such signs does not exceed four (4) square feet and so long as no more than two (2) window signs exist per business. Window signs advertising products or prices are specifically prohibited. 11) In addition to the allowable signs as specified in this l section each restaurant may have a menu sign or board not to1i �•• exceed three (3) square feet. (Added by Town Council 8/15/1991) tt iji aa� An ` it i 115 1.4 13) Signs advertising products, sales, events or .activities which are tacked, painted or otherwise attached to poles, benches, barrels, buildings, traffic signal boxes, posts, trees, 14 sidewalks, curbs, rocks and windows regardless of construction or application, except as otherwise specifically provided for herein. , 14) Signs on or over Town property, except as authorized b the . Y Building Commissioner for temporary signs for non-profit, civic, educational, charitable and municipal agencies. 15) Signs that will obstruct the visibility of another sign which has the required permits and is otherwise in compliance with this ordinance. 16) Off-premises signs except for "Ladder Signs" as otherwise provided for herein. 17) Any sign, picture, publication, display of explicit graphics or language or other advertising which is distinguished or characterized by emphasis depicting or describing sexual conduct or sexual activity as defined in. MGL Ch. 272, § 31, displayed in windows, or upon any building, or visible from sidewalks, walkways, the air, roads, highways, or a public area. (#17 .was added by a 10 Yes 1 No - Roll Call vote of the Barnstable Town Council on 614198 as part of item 98-064) 4-3 .4 Determination of Area: 1) The area of the sign shall be considered to include all lettering, wording and accompanying designs and symbols, together with the background whether open or enclosed, on which they are displayed. 2) The area of signs painted upon or applied to a building shall include all lettering, wording and accompanying designs or symbols together with any background of a different color r than the finish material or' the building face. 3) When a sign consists of individual letters or .symbols attached to or painted on a surface, wall or window, the area shall be that of the smallest rectangle which encompasses all of the letters and symbols. 4) Only 'one side of a double-faced sign shall be counted i g n computing the area of that sign. 5) For the purposes of these regulations, the area of a building face or wall shall be calculated by using a height of no more John Cira . P. o. ' Box 771 JUL 3 0 2001{ Cotuit, MA 02635 e Mr. Donald Marshall SE New England District Manager United States Postal Service 24 Corliss Street Providence, RI 02904 July 25, 2001 Dear Mr. Marshall, I am an abutter to the new US Post Office in Cotuit, MA (02635) . Last year, after much legal expense, lengthy negotiatons which included your predecessor Mr. Thomas Day, the abutters, a representative of Congressman William Delahunt, Town of Barnstable Manager John Klimm and the developer, the Cotuit Federated Church, a special permit was granted to build the post office, subject to terms and conditions set forth by the Zoning board of appeals which rules in these matters. Condition number 5(see enclosed decision and notice) directly addresses the exterior lighting. On the evening of July 23,2001, the lights were turned on and it has been duly noted that there is excessive glare and light spillage onto my property and into my home, a direct violation of the special permit. Please direct the building owner and lessor, the Cotuit Federated Church, to remove the offending luminaries immediately as it is resulting in an intrusive nuisance and a stressful situation for myself and my family. ` For your information, the new post office buliding is located within a residentially zoned district on a piece of property which is basically too small for the building which exists due to compromises and agree ments reached as a result of the" aforementioned negotiations. Thank you for your kind attention in this matter. Respectfully, ohn CIra Copies sent: Mr. Peter Dimatteo, Building Commissioner, Town of Barnstable Mr. James Sheehan, Postmaster, Cotuit, MA. P.O.BOX 771 COTUPT MA 02635 ' 508-4YAii6 3 U.S. POSTAGE PHIO HHRWIGHPORT.MA JUL IV QI (ilJ:7fL STdTfS + 7000 1530 0003 6184 7599 POST.]LSfRV;Cf AMOUNT $2.q4 - 00057703_0a _ Mr. Peter Dimatteo c% Town of Barnstable Building Department 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 -r,. 'r•t � -s�¢ '"i '�-�:litftFl!'�6��7ti�,l.ill3f�141111CFI}:i��3tti�lllll�i:l.ii'i�lllfll -^, 3dOl3AN3 JO .. P.O.BOX 771 COTUIT,MA 02635 508-428-8623 July 25, 2001 Mr. Peter Dimatteo Building Commissioner Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Dear Mr. Dimatteo, i On the evening of July 23, 2001, the exterior lighting was turned on at the Cotuit Post Office. In direct violation of item #5 under the terms and conditions of the special permit, there is offensive glare and. light spillage onto my property and into my home. Specifically, there are two light fixtures attached to the fascia board on the west exterior wall of the building and one light pole at the front, of the building' near- est the property boundary which cause the violations. Please direct the developer, the Cotuit Federated Church, to rectify the situation immediately, as it is causing an intrusive nui- sance. Thank you for your kind attention in this matter. Yours truly, Copies sent: Mr. Arthur Trasczyk .ZBA liason Clerk, Town of Barnstable CERTIFIED MAIL I P.O.BOX771 COTUIT,MA 02635 508-428-8623 U.S. POSTAGE HJLW026-16RT.MR 7000 1530 0003 6184 7582 "'rE°S=hTES Ar,GUdTn' POSTit SERVICE 0000 $2.11 nnns7�n�_n4 Office of the Clerk Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 vL*V 1 :j ��r�ii► :�s tf t'itiiill ' }i al��: �:::�},yi�li� i,:�.il: :el. .. IV . . • . .. 30VId iJ r III II II J I Ili I IIiIIIIIII I !� II Ili II II II JUL 3 0 2001 P.O.BOX 771 r4111►�s�en"� !lAf' COTUIT,MA 02635 � --- 508-428-8623 c' July 25, 2001 Mr. Peter Dimatteo G3 Building Commissioner F y�aD Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Dear Mr. Dimatteo, On the evening of July 23, 2001, the exterior lighting was turned on `at the Cotuit Post Office. In direct violation of item #5 under the terms and conditions of the special permit, there is offensive glare and light spillage onto my property and into my home. Specifically, there are two light fixtures attached to the fascia board on the west exterior wall of the building and one light pole at the front of the building near- est the property boundary which cause the violations. Please direct the developer, the Cotuit Federated Church, to rectify the situation immediately, as it is causing an intrusive nui- sance. Thank you for your kind attention in this matter. r Yours truly, Copies sent: Mr. Arthur Trasczyk ZBA liason Clerk, Town of Barnstable f - �T / D/ r � � � JUL ly f C��diQ1'I aU - 7 c s r t U56� �� //Qr-,�/� Q s Q• /.`�co`rrenc�e� t% {r HIV • - - � . _ .. 1 ' r r' r: f Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services 9a RNSTABi'E' Thomas F.Geiler,Director MASSlE039. a Building.Division Peter F.DiMatteo Building Commissioner 367 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 July 18,2001 DO o a Mr.John Cira P0 Box 771 Cotuit,MA 02635 Re: zoning board of appeals#2000-86 Cotuit Post Office Dear Mr.Cira: In response to our telephone conversation of July 9,2001 and your visit to our office on July 10,2001,I want to give you the results of our research. I also want to thank you for bringing in the material we discussed relative to methods of soundproofing. As I understand the situation,the nature of your complaint is specifically the noise generated by the two air conditioning condensing units located on the southwesterly side of the post office(the same side as your property). The history of the problem includes a decision by the Interim Building Commissioner,Elbert Ulshoeffer,to allow the relocation of the two air conditioning condensing units from the location shown on the building permit construction documents(the mechanical and electrical site plans)to a new location 15'farther westerly behind the structure. In reviewing all the facts available to me in our files and the Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA),I find that there is no violation of the ZBA special permit. I realize that the above is not the decision you want to hear from me. You allege-that the ZBA granted the special permit subject,to.terms and conditions,i.e.,the facts are as follows: 1. the site shall be developed as per plans submitted entitled `Site Plan of Land in Barnstable,MA prepared for Cotuit Post Office,School Street,Cotuit,MA 02635' dated 5/20/99,last revision 5/23/00." After searching the ZBA files,the only plan matching the above,does not include the location of the air conditioning condensing units. The referenced plan is the same plan brought before the Site Plan Review Committee and approved and signed by them. This same referenced plan(item#5 of the ZBA findings of fact)was submitted to the ZBA at the special permit hearing. The ZBA did not,according to their records, approve documents showing the location of the air conditioning condensing units. g010718b i = Mr.John Cira July 18,2001 Page 2 D that the use shall not be"more detrimental to the 2. The second allegation of nonconformance is neighborhood." In the ZBA findings of fact,item 7,the ZBA states"the proposal fulfills the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and would not represent a substantial detriment to the-public good or the neighborhood affected. The Building Division staff has,on a number of occasions,attempted to mediate the differences between .the neighborhood and the property owner and developer. In the spirit of cooperation,the church has agreed to put a fence/barrier beside the two offending units in order to deflect the noise away from your house. The church has demonstrated their intention to respond and attempt to resolve the issue. On your behalf,we are giving them that opportunity. It is my understanding that the police department referred the matter of noise to the Board of Health. The Board of Health has indicated that one of the two units is noisy and objectionable. On my field trip,only one unit was running and I could not hear it at the property line. It is possible that one unit is indeed faulty. My staff is monitoring the units to-determine-the potential defective-unit. -Your research on the sound deadening enclosures will be forwarded to the church. I understand your concern and grief over this matter and hope you understand that we are doing all we can to help facilitate an equitable solution for all. Sincerely, Peter F.DiMatteo Building Commissioner /km cc: John C.Klimm,Town Manager Robert Smith,Town Attorney Ron S.Janson,Chairman,Zoning Board of Appeals Arthur Traczyk,Principal Planner Thomas McKean,Director of Public Health Thomas F. Geiler,Director,Regulatory Services r rq► r r� i FA Al-au Ad& / i I 1 r i ,II i f kt E 1` i �}E if i . II�33 lkf. { � r r !lit tJ #.10 ",AT G'M E-,i T S "t�U e'C'u 2 C--� -7Z�O c-S �2 S Te u C 7v� F �ce-71J rzy ce, ,j s F72 d c T z--rJ F-0 � A-r,J E' L r o a.J S rM Co TU ST oo . Qc—uvc—i:� e-p , c� ram- c�,�PcC—�� s /Ilis 7-Ruc -(? orJ s , TIV-A7J 0,./ 7Z) WY-c s L C-�1 . (,��elf '/-7-t-C- 0 (\J of Gr-f-c- -(-DcuN � -T Am Sci2C- A � eycJr r/+�3 L F S-0 v 7-7or\ J c�-�J Jul os 01 1O: 58a dB Engineering SUU 'i'ri �ui�+ r✓ .. •. • <IY't .A•«\�y :•:•y i r _ .. '.I::fir.' :-Y�!;+r 14 MAN, I soo 71` rill fig} 1 NO - TT ,�JJ, �.. .G v',t41,"' i•.TtOwwJ n s' i. r t,• T:li`:::. �.waia� 4 Ll &A�1i:i::l.:e:ii'�'.ti.'i,.':_ MMMIM d ® Attack the noise at the source-surround it! ® Curtains should just touch the floor- no gaps. ® Most enclosures do not need a roof. This helps in lighting, ventilation, & fire sprinkler systems. Q Sliding doors allow easy access to the inside of enclosures. ® Clear vinyl windows give quick viewing to critical areas. p Curtain systems can be hung from ceiling track systems or floor supported track systems. All materials meet the toughest fire ratings. Approximate Product octave Band Center Frequencies(Hz) Curtain Types Weight(ib15q ft) 125 250 500 1,000 2,000 4,000 Sound Transmission Coefficient 16 27 40 44 47 29 1.5 12 BSC-25(Composite) 43 27 BBC-13(Composite) 1.3 11 16 24 30 39 26 10•CV(Transparent) 1.0 14 19 23 28 33 37 19 QFA-10{No-Barrier} 0.4 6 11 15 20 25_ �..._�_.��:_ .32..,. FModel ustical Curtain Enclosure gp* Corner Connector (Double Track) -25 > Double Track Transparent Barrier 10-CV 3-Way � +� •� �� ,it Single Track "T" Connector !' \ Nylon Roller + Al `1i I• It .1!+_J I.1 ! BSC-25,�A t. . auilted - Fiberglass vv % Absorber t+i Vinyl + ' B Barrier BC-13 ,cam- Septum Vinyl Barrier \ Hanging Acoustical Curtain Panels BSC-25 Support Column Support Base Cf\ Jul 09 01 10: 58a dB Engineering 800 771 4874 p. 3 IT' Stule: hifiei Septum Composite Scund Seol's?"85CN composite features a non•reinforcedloaded vinyl noise Barrier Septum configuration(BSC) Quilted Fiberglass Absorber border septum(middle)with o quilted fiberglass sound absorber on loth sides. Idoolly suited as cn acoustical liner,the inner layer of quilted fiberglass decouples the banner from the surface to improve its noise blork�ng obrlily while the outer layer adds sound absorption to the treated environment: Quilted Fiberglass Absorber Barrier Septum y s• �•fl f�pr:� .�'. 4: � •'te1�t, i,.,, Y� sorbetr/Bar, ranels inMSQ: Sound Seal 8SC Acoustical Poners were used to line the interior of a large natural gas compressor station.The sound absorptive quilted fiberglass portion of the compos- ite p onel reduce d Me noise levels inside die building by 6 to 8 decibles,and comb ined �`.� RISO RYa{lahle flS: with the noise barrier septum and quilted fiberglass decoupler on the opposite side of Ne product,produced o 15 d13(A)noise reduction outide of the building.See Sound ♦ Rolls with edges bound and sewn with matching edge binding Off Cose History Vol 1,No. 1 forodditionot information. ♦ Unbound rolls-edges exposed ♦ Standard roll size 4V x 251 . _ r :� ,. R ♦ Curtain panels with grommets at top and Hook&loop V.NN/ L, fasteners sewn along edges kr, , •. , r ♦ Liner panels with bound edgr<s NN., ♦ Diecut pieces,custom fobricotions X`:,`.�N,N. ` ' a ° r^..' ♦ Types of facing material on quilted fiberglass: VCFC--Vin I•Coated Fiberglass Cloth .�'.".�• . ',-`` •' '`r `r CFC—Silicone•Coated•Fiberglass•(loth V'�^ ;' ` �"' NPS--Non-Woven•Porous Scrim �: . GUILFORD--Decorative fabric �'` ,'w ; •; ♦ Available Barriers: BSC products urlize a flexible 1 lb.PSF non-reinforced loaded vinyl noise barrier septum (B•1 ONR). Also ovoilable with a 2 lb.PSF or 112 lb.PSF barrier See back page for specifications Jul 08 01 �1\1 : 02a dB Eng i_neer i ng _ 800 771 48.74_ p. 4 J � �.,�,./k1. .•y .�y. ir. :{�j' .'4 j �..;i.`y' �i ��. '� �.. � 4. In addition to very effective,high performance acoustical curtoin panels,a successful, functional acoustical enclosure often requires o wide orroy of features and options. These include roof top panes,volances,corner Nalments, view yindows, ventilation boff,'es, exhaust fans and a wide variety of curtain Support home options. Curtain Support Framework Rigid Roof Panels y` ♦ Stcndord curtoin track A�" [ ♦ BSC and BBC style roof and hardware system ; panels incorporate an =t manufoctured from heavy internal stiffener , gauge galvanized steel components ♦ Allows for spanning ♦ Floor mounted,beam mounted, across top of enclosure suspenaed,wall mounted and ceiling without sagging mounted styles available ♦ Custom sizes avoilWe ♦ Double Crock configurations allows for ♦ BSC•25RP roof panel slide-by access at any point STC rating 31 ♦ Curved corner options allow for even greater access ♦ T a n r' Roo To Valance 1 f p Type H•D Heavy Duty Frame(optional} ,.� features structural steel tubing for maximum -- _- ♦ Used an enclosures with roofs strength to accommodote larger enclosures ♦ Flexible barrier valance closes gap between roof panels and side panels ♦ Hook 8 Loop fostener'attochment Roof lop Vent Baffle ♦ Allows for exhaust air,low out of enclosure ♦ Rugged sheet metal construction lined with •� ��k �� °� sound absorption material ♦ Attaches to rigid roof panel Intalle Sir Ventilation ♦ AllowsJor air 'i flow into enclosure `�� x�rr i r j�� ;`r,' � � without com romisin k P 9 performance. , a;, ,' ' , . • ♦ Manufactured from some `i, ,,! t_ ,. �. „'.. •✓ ,�. �� ',� 1 r7 components as BBC curtain panels ' a• a �" ,- a' ♦ Sewn onto side curtain panels for 4 maximum integrity View Windows ♦ Allow v' it s for o �sibi i ry ♦ Manufactured from transparent flexible vinyl sheet noise barrier material ♦ Maintains acoustical performance ♦ Sewn-on,removable,hook&loop fastener s attached,drop-down or lift-up styles available Jul 09 01 11 : 04a dB Engineering 600 771 4874 The most effective noise reduction products combine both sound absorption and noise ' borri,�r properties.Tested under strict compliance to appropriate AS TM standards, we offer the fallowing results. Rcoustical Data: Sound Transmission loss(dB)Octave Band Center Frequencies(Hz) Sound Absorption Data-Absorber Component Random Incident Thickness Wt. Sound Absorption product an./Nom) lb./S.F. 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 STC Octave Band Center Frequencies(Hz) BBC-13•2" 2 1.5 13 20 29 40 50 5S 32 Prcduct 12S 250 Soo 1000 2000 4000 _NR( BSC•13 1 1.3 11 16 24 30 35 35 27 BBC 1"thick .12 .47 .85 .84 .64 .62 .70 BBGl4.2" 2 1.5 1.3 20 29 40 50 55 32 BB( 2"thick .07 .27 .96 1.13 1.08 .99 .85 ; BB(•14 1 1.3 11 16 24 30 35 35 27 BBC 4"thick .21 .89 1.09 1.17 1.13 1.07 1.05 BSC•25 2 1.5 12 ib 21 40 44 43 29 BSC 2"thick 19 .99 .96 .80 .51 .33 8S BSC•2S•28 2 1 2.5 19 22 28 40 56 61 33 Per ASTM:(423.81 and C413.90o 85(31 1 1 1.5 11 1 16 23 33 t 3E 39 21 Per 16TM:E 90 Barrier speciftcarions: oiso 8vailable from United Process: Borrier Wei Or Thickness The tables on this page refer to some of the more common BSC and BBC Component Style lb./Sq.R. Inches Composite composites.There are many others which combine the wide variety of 10 NR Noo-Reirdorced 1 107 BSC barriers and quilted fiberglass.absorbers available to:address any industrial B application.For example,BSC•26 utilizes a silic one-co ated-fibergloss cloth B•5 NR Nona^forced 1/7 .042 BSC faced quilted fiberglass absorber(instead of the vinyl-coated-fiberglass cloth B-20 NR Non-Reirdarced 2 . .225 BSC faced quilted fiberglass on 6505) combined with a 1 lb.PSF loaded vinyl B-10 R Reinforced 1 .090 BBC noise barrier septum for high temperature application. B SR Reinforced l/2 050 BBC likewise,BBC•14 or BBC•14.2"incorporates the silicone facing,instead of the vinyl-faced BBC-1 3 or BB(-1 3-2",combined with a 1 lb.PSF reinforced landed vinyl backing.In addition to high temperature applications,these U.V.resistant Milable Facings on puilred Fiberglass: curtain panels ore suitable for outdoor applications. ♦ 'linyl-{oared Fiberglass•Cloth(Standard) Another example such as BSC•25.26 substitutes a 2 lb.PSF noise barrier for Colors:Gray,White,Tan or Black the 1 lb.PSF version in BSC•25 to improve acoustical performance,especially Temp.Range:•20°F to+ 180°F at lower frequencies. Durable,resists most chemicals ♦ i irone•(crate Fiberglass•Cloth(High Temp) Color:Silver Distributed 8y Femp.Range:•901 to+550°F Jsed on high teMerature applications 41so suitable for outdoor UV exposure ♦ Nonwoven orous Scrim(Economy) Colors:Off White Temp.Range:•40°F to+350°F Readily accepts any adhesive l 4 Guilford fabric facing(Decorative) Colors:Over 60 colors to choose from (see swcich booklet) Temp.Range:•20°F to+350°F M 1 Vlckii Bglomonte . -_.. fR 101 fabric is{lass 1 Flammability Rated ' °l "t"' 3�re+eratAtorlagelr } i For commercial or architectural applications _....... ..�-.«8�O i�l�►� se- I For additional information see: SSTO1 {urtain Systems -loon S:Maln tree;bu �1a0 rA4Orsfistcl; e� 6063------ I •Fdc(8 7) j53-0187 SS104 Flexible Barriers Phone( 17) 53 1 SS106 Quilted Fiberglass Absorbers emotl: ngt® bell.(�et wru .SOnonolse g i ...... Jul UJ U1 11 : uba chi Engineering auu i r 1 -to IT r • Wj; . t�i li •; �tl f J SOW Sod QF,t•10 r'wfxte)mduees nke hvd We and 7xound ft Sound Rhsofption Liner em7uaurrentcrx+hal600th ♦ Treat buildings,rooms or existing enclosure ♦ Reduces sound levels in interior of structure Rcoustical Data: ♦ Glue-on backings or mechanical Random Incident Sound Absorption fasteners ova�oble Sound Absorption Data Octave Band[enter Frequencies(HZ) Model No. Nominol Thickness 125 250 500 1000 12000 4000 NRt OFA•1 1 inch .12 .47 .85 .84 .64 .62 .70 Flammahiiitu Ratings: OFA'2 i inch .04 .46 .86 .81 .59 .31 .70 OFA•4 1 inch .17 .30 .83 .82 .59 .37 .65 Flame Smoke Model Numbers Sprsad Density ClassOFA•7 2 inches .07 .27 .96 1.13 1.08 .99 .85 VinykoetegleTlasstbth faced: OFA 10 2 inches .19 .99 .96 .80 .57 .33 .85 QFA•l, OFA4, OFA•7 17.66 22.75 1,A QFA•14 4 inches 21 .89 1.09 OFA•10, OFA•14 OFA•20 ....1.11(i� 1.13 1.01 1.05 SiUconeioated fiberglass•clo$faced: Absorption[oefficienis•Sabin/Unit QFA-11, OFA•16 QFA•22 - OFA OFA•5, OFA- a. 11.43 1,A Sound Absorption Data Octave Band Center Frequencies(HI) Non-woven porous scrim feted: Model No. Dimensions 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 NRf QFA•3, QFA•9, QFA•I6 5.07 .45 1,A QFA•4 BoMes 2'x 4',1"th .59 2.43 7.17 8.66 8.82 6.71 6.75 Flammability testing per ASTM E 84: OFA•10 Baffles 2'x 4',2'th .91 6.07 8.25 8.88 6.65 5.58 7.45 "Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materlols" Acoustical Testing Per ASTM(423.77,C423.81,C423.84A,C413 90 \ 1 f •1 � f I: fr Irrr• r : / • 1 1- 1 f ,. `.''... �'� I r i 1 I: 1/ r I 1 r r :r r: I •rr r rr ,r� /'• � - ':-•h . r r 1 1 7 r r r I r r r r I r •!` f l l 1 1 r ♦ r•r r r ar r•: 'taf"l°!y``'r�° ,� �,�1"��,.1 �uyr ♦yjr•� r l l 1 1 1 f l l 1 1 { �,c . ',A •y .• '!/ '•Lr~[ r , 1 rN y r 4 q J 1 1 1�'�a ��'��e'FC��'�.'n l}1�'�•ir•�A d i<�ti; vA�rF {{FF ��p'W f,, N� �:� '+r ��•,y�F'j1r:�,�°:�y�a64�'r��'.�',�} 9'. 1 1 1 1 1 1• •1 _ •..... {N N l� }trf r ['r 11Y� Ma to 1 1 1 I 1 �A, g( f �. �•.di?1. .ci��t;14'`',r-el`b.,�,�.Y+u`�^`'1rA�`,r a r X� •r,.r r 3 � � , 1 r` � �! � �� 4 r4.rt3�,�i , JS]'r ��r� �'{P � ,vI � Y.� �i�. f;. i�"��I.�Z.h ° Pr'1� `C�ii;•��'� '"r kj tt > �,. ul�'1° ,• � �7Tyyi� i 4 1 V�t,�.s7k �• ;'�i, . . 'tt, i 1. 9 0�} .J••'C ,5 r /• �''.: / f 1 1"Y L Ltl. �_T I�n `�� ram.+.p�'f;L.?1 �:C � _ I •k`� f!� fr c /r 11 a k r '� ,�v:, r '. �./c •�1 .,i ° ( I ,,,e r�t�. �l��,•/%/it/ � � � rKl�k r�?7�t �. f2 � f///f� ilrr( ..� V �'in •`try' '_, \ r * SAP{ •'� � L /� is f ,/ i T ':rf+�..�tt �If�J-yrc.,r 1. .•/�// /,/ �' '" '' 1 III a � ,¢• �✓ 1 11 1 1 •/i ! 1 1 1 11 _'�^�i•� t ,�� r t, d r,r'!. r 1 /1 :1 :11: 11 1 1 1 ti�..�Lr..., •�..��_ I I F. •. ;�i 9i �.)y' 'C..._ m IL , m s om ,! el \ �. tv T�I r L � al oC v w , 1 c w w I I � I ' .� DB ENGINEERING o RocESSwE BALLOONS AN M r a C PAN turour o°' 3bZ52 w AAMM "A�pu n moo 11 0 4 j \ 721i 41 Y w � i W tl i aa. � to � N U ---- p Ste; DB ENGINEERM MOMSSWE BJ UOUS M GIFTS � o 31GC[lJIY0il1 �+ 3625 n a, r f ► l l'f s -r � _ i� � it �!' - - ' �ii - } � -� }y { I. 14' lip �' ��` �I`` � � � - �'Y I � - j7`� Ali I) l �e� �I� �� i� _ - f � � _ , �J� �111 II�11 �!1 ��! �� i l 't . '4. - k �� _ .. �. �� t i' }� �3 I� ff � < � 1� - ifl ! � _ �{�� ._ �1 �� i, _tom I r !L r,a S/SQ•F,irs�C!�W J E _�`:� •_.�-; .`i.•�- : 1i�lEftE'Is��i1.EElI:� ,,E�IE '11Et•EiE,tsEll•tE�E�i�IEEI;IE,Et,t1 f 3 , i i ( ill i it (ll(( c f l 1 tl t t tilt( ill (lilt ( i i ED S. MANGIAFICO Mr. Peter Matteo Building Commissioner Town of Barnstable 367 Main St. Hyannis,MA 02601 Attn: Arthur Tracdzyk Dear Sirs, I am writing in reference to the decision and notice of appeal 2000-86 a special permit (section 4-4.5.z) expansion of a conforming use. This pertained to the construction of a new U.S. Post Office building by the Cotuit Federated Church of in the village of Cotuit. As an abutter,I v�ould ask that the decision be enforced as agreed to and stated in the permit before the issuance of a permanent"certificate of occupancy". At this time there are two specific violations of that decision that should be corrected. • The first is the position of the air conditioning compressor, which is not placed "as per plan"(a condition specifically spoken to in the decision) . In its current position the compressor is loud and creates a nuisance that did not previously' exist for the immediate neighbor. • The second.is the condition of the exterior lights. These were to be 16 feet in height and"shielded"to focus the illumination on the Post Office property only. The lights are not now shielded. The site plan referred to in the decision and from which these violations occur is the plan in Barnstable,MA prepared for the Cotuit Post Office on School St. in Cotuit,MA dated 5-20-99 last revised 5-23-00. In the interest of our community, the value of our property and the integrity of the decision, I do hope that our town will see to it that all issues of compliance are completed prior to issuance of a"permanent certificate of occupancy" Please contact me if I can answer any questions or help in any way. CC: Robin C. Giagregorio �d-' P.O Box 823 Cotuit MA 02635 mangiaficogmediaone.net 508-428-4648 L R � � e � m8� �a 71670 t 1 1 --- VS--2 II_-00 0 o � i r: Fj ' A TRUE COPY ATTEST BARMABIA KAM vloxeleo^, Town Clerk . Town of Barnstable BARNSTABLE Zoning Board of Appeals Decision and Notice Cotuit Post Office-Cotuit Federated Church - Appeal 2000-86 Special Permit Section 4-4.5:(2) Expansion of a Nonconforming Use Summary: Granted with Conditions Petitioner: Trustees of The Cotuit Federated Church Property Address: 45 School Street,Cotuit, MA Assessor's Map/Parcel: Map 035, Parcel 014 Zoning: RF- Residential F Zoning District Background: The subject of this appeal is the US Post Office, Cotuit. The Trustees of the Cotuit Federated Church;who own the property have requested a Modification of Special Permit 1958-15 and/or a Special Permit in accordance with Section 4-4.5.(2)for an expansion of a pre-existing non-conforming:use. The property is a 1.79 acre site located at 45 School Street, Cotuit, MA. The area is zoned Residential F Zoning District. The structure and use has the benefit of Special Permit No. 1.958-15 to permit a non residential use of a post office. Prior to 1985, the site was that of an elementary';school. Today, the property is developed with a one-story,-1,600 sq.ft. post office. The applicant seeks to retain the use and construct a new one-story post office structure of 3,600 sq.ft. as per plans.submitted. Procedural Summary: This appeal was filed afithe Town Clerk's Office and at the Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals on August 16, 2000. A public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals was duly advertised and notices sent to all abutters in accordance with MGL Chapter 40A. The hearing was opened September 27, 2000 at which time the Board granted a special permit pursuant to Section 4-4.5.(2) Expansion'of a Nonconforming Use. Hearing Summary: Board Members hearing this appeal were; Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy, Ralph Copeland, Tom DeRiemer and Chairman Ron Jansson. Attorney Bernard Kilroy represented the applicant. He gave a brief description of the project and noted that the applicant would restrict the number of postal boxes to 1200, limit the hours of the post office to that at which it presently operates, and at the request of an abutter erect a fence to limit the impacts on the neighboring property. Mr. Kilroy and Ron Mycock, a Trustee of the Cotuit Federated Church, gave a brief history of the site and discussed parking, lighting and site features. Jackie Barton, an abutter, explained the traffic and use of the parking lot. The Board and Mr. Kilroy discussed the nature of the relief being requested. Public comment was requested. Ms. Barton spoke in favor of the proposal. She stated that village,residents were comfortable with the proposal and requested that the hours of operation be limited and the number of boxes be limited to 1200. No one spoke in opposition. Findings of Fact: At the hearing of September 27, 2000 the Board unanimously found the following findings of fact as related to Appeal 2000-86: 1. Appeal 2000-86 of the Trustees of The Cotuit Federated Church is for a Modification of Special Permit 1958-15 and/or a special permit pursuit to Section 4-4.5.(2) Expansion of a Nonconforming Use for the Cotuit Post Office.. The property is addressed as 45 School Street, Cotuit, MA, Assessor's Map 035, Parcel 014. 2. The Trustees of the Federated Church have requested a Special Permit in order to redevelop the site for a new and expanded post office building. r 3. That property is a 1.79 acre site located in the center of the village area of Cotuit at 45 School Street. The area is zoned Residential F Zoning District permitting only single-family dwellings. The structure and use has the benefit of a 1958 Special Permit No. 15 to permit a change from an elementary school building use, to a post office building and use. The property is presently developed with a one-story, 1,600 sq.ft. United States Post Office building and associated parking. 4. The applicant seeks to retain the use and construct a new one-story post office structure of 3,600 sq.ft., and parking for 32 vehicles, loading dock, a new Title V septic system and associated landscaping, lighting and site drainage. 5. An approved site plan entitled Site Plan of Land in Barnstable, MA prepared for Cotuit Post Office, School Street Cotuit, MA 02635" and dated 5-20-99 last revision date of 5-23-00 has been submitted and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. 6. The application falls within a category specifically excepted in the ordinance for a grant of a Special Permit.. 7. The proposal fulfills the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance and would not represent a substantial detriment to the public good or the neighborhood affected. 8. The Board has determined that the use,establish by a 1958 special permit, issued when the area was zoned RL-Residential Limited, has become non-conforming with subsequent residential zoning amendments that no longer would permit the use as established in 1958. Decision: Based on the findings of fact, a motion was duly made and seconded to grant a special permit pursuit to Section 4-4.5.(2) Expansion of a Nonconforming Use, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The site shall be developed as per plans submitted entitled "Site Plan of Land in Barnstable, MA prepared for Cotuit Post Office, School Street Cotuit, MA 02635"dated 5-20-99, last revision 5-23-00. 2. Appropriate signage shall be provided indicating one way (inside the two way entrance). 3. The locus shall comply with all applicable Building Codes, Town of Barnstable Board of Health and State Fire Prevention Regulations. 4. Signage shall conform to the sign provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. Lighting shall not exceed 16 feet in height and all luminaries shall be shielded from glare and directed only on the post office site. 6. The number of postal boxes is limited to 1,200 7. The normal hours of operations shall be from 6:00 AM to 5:30 PM, Monday to Friday, and 6:00 AM to 12:00 Noon on Saturdays, closed on Sundays. The Vote was as follows: AYE: ; Gail Nightingale, Richard Boy, Ralph Copeland, Tom.DeRiemer and Chairman Ron Jansson NAY: None Ordered: ` Special Permit 2000-82 has been granted with conditions. This decision must be recorded at the Registry of Deeds for it to be in effect. The relief authorized by this decision must be exercised in one year. Appeals of this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 17, within twenty (20) days after the date of the filing of this decision. A copy of which must be filed in the office of the Town Clerk. Ron S. nsson, hairman Date Signed Linda Hutchenrider, Clerk of the Town of Barnstable, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, hereby certify that twenty (20) days have elapsed since the Zoning Board of Appeals filed this decision and that no appeal of the decision has been fled in the office of the Town Clerk. Ce Signed.and sealed this day of G`.� Sande he pains and penalties of perjury. inda Hutchenrider, Town Clerk 2 DiMatteo, Peter From: DiMatteo, Peter To: Klimm, John Cc: , Geiler Tom; Smith Robert Subject: Cotuit Post Office complaints- Mr. Cira Date: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:26AM Dear Mr. Klimm. Per our conversation on July 2, 2001, we have researched the plans and history of the alleged violation: Appended you will find the history to date prepared by Robin. Additionally, I found that the AC units were moved 15'westerly and 15' northerly from their originally indicated location as shown on a plan I will bring to you. The AC units were not shown on the site plan for the ABA hearing but were apparently shown on the mechanical site plan. Robin has negotiated with the church to construct a fence which should deflect noise to the rear(south)of the building and away from Mr. Cira. We will be monitoring this situation very carefully. It has come to my attention, yesterday, that another neighbor across School Street from the Post Office has complained about the bright"interior" lights that affect him. We are investigating this allegation also. ( see appended memo from Robin). 7/2/01 Robin C Giangregorio Cotuit Post Office 45 School Street Cotuit, Ma. Re: Noise emanating from AC units on the westerly side of the facility have spent a considerable amount of time discussing this problem with Mr. Scales (on behalf of the Church) and Mr. Cira (the abutter). I have also been out to the site. During my visit, I did not find the noise level to be harsh; in fact I thought it to be quite low for the commercial nature of the units. I do not doubt the validity of Mr. Cira's complaint, considering the way sound travels and the quiet village atmosphere of Cotuit. I simply note that at the time I was there, the units (possibly only one of two)appeared to be running. The noise level was not the loud, boisterous sound I was expecting but rather a monotone, low rumble noise much like static. The interim Building Commissioner, Elbert Ulshoeffer approved the relocation of the two units in question. This, he claimed was due primarily for purpose of insuring proper functioning. When I raised Mr. Cira's question regarding a possible violation of the special permit I was informed that this decision was based upon the building code and was not a zoning issue. Mr. Ulshoeffer immediately dismissed the issue stating that relocation of the AC units could not be interpreted to be a violation of the special permit, as it does not encroach upon the side yard setbacks. I believe that Planning concurs. have conversed with Mr. Cira on two or three occasions. I have listened to his concerns and complaints, expressed my sympathy and re-assured him that I will attempt to do something on his behalf. I did, however, explain to Mr. Cira that we could not overturn the decision of the previous Commissioner. With this in mind, I requested written notification from the ZBA citing their interpretation that the re-location of the units is indeed a violation of the special permit. Once,we receive justification, this department will pursue all avenues available to us. In the mean time, I spoke to Mr. Scales (representing the church)about installing a fence (I amended the request to an 8'stockade). Mr. Cira was not very optimistic about this. He wants a particular concrete fence and has since spoken to an acoustical engineer regarding this matter. I explained that we need to start somewhere and the church appears willing to continue its pursuit to mitigate the sound. The theory is that the fence would channel the sound to the rear of the property, which is wooded and may absorb the noise thus abating or otherwise mitigating the sound level exposure on the westerly side. Page 1 I also explained that once the fence is installed I would request Glenn Harrington (BOH Agent)to return for an impartial assessment of the sound level as he had previously visited Mr. Cira's home. If Glenn is not satisfied, the church will continue to the next level, which may involve installing baffles inside the enclosure, etc. or some other measure until Mr. Harrington deems it to be an acceptable level. Mr. Cira countered that the noise level prior to construction was zero and that is what the goal should be. It should also be pointed out that the AC units are on timers that are set to terminate at 5:30 pm and come on again at 7:30 am. (or so I am informed). This was specifically done in response to Mr. Cira's complaint that the noise kept his family awake all night. The noise by law, I believe is enforced by the PD but is typically reserved for music and noises not normally associated with standard office/building equipment. I believe the PD referred the issue back to the BOH. Unfortunately, this is a real quagmire. I trust the church is attempting to be a good neighbor. I also recognize their concern about cost. I am unsure of the PO's (federal)contribution to the project. Perhaps if the noise is not abated to the satisfaction of Mr. Cira, the PO may offer some assistance. I begged Mr. Cira's indulgence until the fence is actually installed. I understand his frustration but we really need to focus on the first step before we condemn it as a failure. 7/5/01 Robin C. Giangregorio Cotuit Post Office—Lighting Issue On Tuesday afternoon, July 2, 2001 at 4:25 pm I spoke to Mr. Dwight Cody of 7 High Street, an abutter of the Cotuit Post Office. Mr. Cody called to complain about the lighting of the aforementioned facility. When questioned him regarding the illumination of the parking lot(which is governed by special permit) he explained that his complaint is regarding the interior illumination. Apparently, it is too bright and therefore interferes with his ability to enjoy his property.This, he explained is a violation of the special permit whereas it is ordered that no condition should be detrimental to the neighborhood. He defines excessive lighting as detrimental. He has not come forward sooner because this is his summer home and he is usually down only on weekends. I informed Mr. Cody that interior lighting is not within our jurisdiction in the building department. I admitted that I was unsure about the ZBA's right to intervene at this late date. I did offer to contact the church and or post office and attempt to mediate a compromise on his behalf. It should also be noted for the record that Mr. Cody is currently renovating his kitchen. Mr. Cira, the abutter who complained about the AC units violating the special permit and depriving him of his right to enjoy his property, had possession of Mr. Cody's house key. It was Mr. Cira who admitted the MM building inspector into the Cody property. This would certainly suggest that the two neighbors are on good terms and would explain the common usage of the phrases such as"violation of special permit"&"detrimental to the neighborhood". On Friday, July 6th, I called Mr. Scales (representing the church and being record owner of the PO property). I asked him to intervene on my behalf and reduce the interior illumination. He agreed to pursue this with the postmaster who is expected to return from vacation next Tuesday. At the conclusion of our conversation, Mr. Scales agreed to inform me directly of the anticipated measures they will take as a result of this request. Page 2 7,5,01 Robin C. Giangregorio Cotuit Post Office—Lighting Issue On Tuesday afternoon,July 2,2001 at 4:25 pm I spoke to Mr.Dwight Cody of 7 High Street,an abutter of the Cotuit Post Office. Mr.Cody called to complain about the lighting of the aforementioned facility. When I questioned him regarding the illumination of the parking lot(which is governed by special permit) he explained that his complaint is regarding the interior illumination. Apparently,it is too bright and therefore interferes with his ability to enjoy his property.This,he explained is a violation of the special permit whereas it is ordered that no condition should be detrimental to the neighborhood. He defines excessive lighting as detrimental. He has not come forward sooner because this is his summer home and he is usually down only on weekends. I informed Mr.Cody that interior lighting is not within our jurisdiction in the building department. I admitted that I was unsure about the ZBA's right to intervene at this late date. I did offer to contact the church and or post office and attempt to mediate a compromise on his behalf. It should also be noted for the record that Mr.Cody is currently renovating his kitchen. Mr.Cira,the abutter who complained about the AC units violating the special permit and depriving him of his right to enjoy his property,had possession of Mr.Cody's house key. It was Mr.Cira who admitted the MM building inspector into the Cody property On Friday,July 6`h,I called Mr.Scales(representing the church and being record owner of the PO property). I asked him to intervene on my behalf and reduce the interior illumination. He agreed to pursue this with the postmaster who is expected to return from vacation next Tuesday. At the conclusion of our conversation,Mr.Scales agreed to inform me directly of the anticipated measures they will take as a result of this request. July 3, 2001 Robin C. Giangregorio r Dwight Cody Site Plan Review Coordinator 7 High St. Zoning Board of Appeals Cotuit, MA 02635 367 Main St. (508)428-2036 Hyannis,MA 02601 (617)908-6258(cell) Dear Ms. Robin Giangregorio: I am writing to bring to the Zoning Board of Appeals' attention a special permit violation. This violation stems from a special permit(Appeal 2000-86)that was granted on September 27, 2000 to the Cotuit Federated Church,to redevelop a site at 45 School St. The permit was issued to redevelop the locality for a new and expanded post office building. At the time when the permit was originallybein ne negotiated,'a grow of abutters,`includin m self careful iy noted the ermits'"` $ g P g Y Y P conditions,being particularly cautious that it did not violate any of the town's by-laws. The town by-laws are specific concerning the expansion of non-conforming use,that they be not"more detrimental to the neighborhood". It is now clearly evident to me that the new post office is not conforming to such a standard. My home at 7 High St. is located directly across the street from the post office, and has been highly inconvenienced by the new lights of the post office that are being left on at night. That amount of light emitted from the large bay windows located in the front of the building are an extreme nuisance and have unquestionably affected my property in a detrimental way. This is a violation of the Terms and Conditions that the Zoning Board of Appeals decided was necessary for the post office to conform to. Number five(5)of the Terms and Conditions states that"lighting shall not exceed 16 ft. in height and all luminaries shall be shielded from glare and directed only on the post office site"..The excessive light has made sleeping difficult and has made sitting outside less appealing. Furthermore,I do not see the necessity of leaving such lights on after the post office is closed. There are no bushes nor other obstructions to weaken the amount of projected light upon my property. Seeing as the town by- laws are quite clear on this matter, I hereby urge you to enforce the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals and ultimately the town by-laws so as to keep our community from suffering adversely. Thank you for your kind attention in this matter. " Sincerely, !� Dwight Cody Copies sent: Office of the Town Clerk ; Office of the Building Comissioner, THE BOSTON CONNECTION INC. 414 CAMBRIDGE ST. ALLSTON, MA 02134 2oniny �Dclf21 p� , 3�7 Ma[n r � M=s.�•xr..=i, ._ .r. !E!'Mill If)If11.UI dill 14111�i;i1lll l!"; ld fhis 111/:11.1 ! 1 f ; N Mij liiIf l i I I i Hill i t it it J 1 H \ 1 �a 7/2/01 Robin C Giangregorio SPR 039-2000 Cotuit Post Office 45 School Street Cotuit, Ma. Re: Noise emanating from AC units on the westerly side of the facility I have spent a considerable amount of time discussing this problem with Mr. Scales (on behalf of the Church) and Mr. Cira (the abutter). I have also been out to the site. During my visit, I did not find the noise level to be harsh; in fact I thought it to be quite low for the commercial nature of the units. I do not doubt the validity of Mr. Cira's complaint, considering the way sound travels and the quiet village atmosphere of Cotuit. I simply note that at the time I was there, the units (possibly only one of two) appeared to be running. The noise level was not the loud, boisterous sound I was expecting but rather a monotone, low rumble noise much like static. ` The interim Building Commissioner, Elbert Uleshoffer approved the relocation of the two units in question. This, he claimed was due primarily for purpose of insuring proper functioning. When I raised Mr. Cira's question regarding a possible violation of the special permit I was informed that this decision was based upon the building code and was not a zoning issue. .Mr. Ulshoeffer immediately dismissed the issue stating that relocation of the AC units could not be interpreted to be a violation of the special permit, as it does not encroach upon the side yard setbacks. I believe that Planning concurs. I have conversed with Mr. Cira on two or three occasions. I have listened to his concerns and complaints, expressed my sympathy and re-assured him that I will attempt to do something on his behalf. I did, however, explain to Mr. Cira that we could not overturn the decision of the previous Commissioner. With this in mind, I requested written notification from the ZBA citing their interpretation that the re-location of the units is indeed a violation of the special permit. Once, we receive justification, this department will pursue all avenues available to us. In the mean time, I spoke to Mr. Scales (representing the church) about installing a fence (I amended the rquest to an 8' stockade). Mr. Cira was not very optimistic about this. He wants a particular concrete fence and has since spoken to an acoustical engineer regarding this matter. I explained that we need to start somewhere and the church appears willing .to continue its pursuit to mitigate the sound. The theory is that the fence would channel the sound to the rear of the property, which is wooded and may absorb the noise thus abating or otherwise mitigating the sound level exposure on the westerly side. I also explained that once the fence is in I would request Glenn Harrington (BOH Agent) to return for an impartial assessment of the sound level as he had previously visited Mr. Cira's home. If Glenn is not satisfied, the church will continue to the next level, which may involve installing baffles inside the enclosure, etc. or some other measure until Mr. Harrington deems it to be an acceptable level. Mr. Cira countered that the noise level prior to construction was zero and that is what the goal should be. It should also be pointed out that the AC units are on timers that are set to terminate at 5:30 pm and come on again at 7:30 am. (or so I am informed). This was specifically done in response to Mr. Cira's complaint that the noise kept his family awake all night. The noise by law, I believe is enforced by the PD but is typically reserved for music and noises not normally associated with standard office/building equipment. I believe the PD referred the issue back to the BOH. Unfortunately, this is a real quagmire. I trust the church is attempting to be a good neighbor. I also recognize their concern about cost. I am unsure of the PO's (federal) contribution to the project. Perhaps if the noise is not abated to the satisfaction of Mr. Cira, the PO may offer some assistance. I begged Mr. Cira's indulgence until the fence is actually installed. I understand his frustration but we really need to focus on the first step before we condemn it as a failure. 4 tIIwllww►w►►w►►ww►►w y P.O.BOX 771 COTUIT,MA 02685s �- 508-428-8623 -�-- July 2, 2001 Ms. Robin Giangregorio . . c/o Building Department Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Dear Ms. Giangregorio, Thank you for forwarding the letter from the developer of the Cotuit Post Office, The Cotuit Federated Church. Their solu- tion to the noise problem will do nothing to alleviate it. This is not just my opinion, but the opinion of the inspector from the Board of Health, Mr.Glenn Harrington, a member of the . Board of Health, Ms.. Susan Rask, as well as an acoustical engineering firm which I have consulted. The developer would be better advised to preserve the funds they intend to spend on a simple fence, which may exacerbate the problem, and apply them to a more professional solution, one which is more appro- priate for these commercial/industrial units. 1 Town by-laws are very explicit concerning expansions of non- conforming uses. They cannot be more detrimental to the neigh- borhood. There was no air conditioning sound before the pro- ject was approved. There should be none now. Furthermore, the moving of the air conditioning units from the location on the plan approved for 'their special permit constitutes a violation of the terms of that permit. Again, this is not only my opinion. It is shared by Ms Rask of the Board of Health and Mr. Michael Crossen, my legal counsellor with the firm, Rubin and Rudman, 50 Rowes Wharf, Boston. It is unfortunate that delays in receiving an occupancy permit are an expense for the developer. It would be more unfortunate, however, if the legal and regulatory checks and balances provided for the protection of all citizens of this town were ignored for economic expediency. A property in Cotuit is worth x dollars. A property in Cotuit with a con- stant noise nuisance is worth x- dollars. I am perfectly willing to share with the developer any information I have gathered concerning professionally designed noise abatement structures the cost of which, when compared to the potential cost of lengthy delays, is most reasonable. Any plan for the effective abatement of the noise should be presented written in detail and enforceable. There should be no perma- nent occupancy permit granted until the problem is remedied. Respectfully, n Cira cc: Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Barnstable office of the Clerk, Town of Barnstable Mr. Michael Crossen, Attorney-at-Law 06/29/200' 09:48 508-362-7867 __AR.n, t^la p.Jr=T'= PA:3E 02 The Tatuit eberuteb T'h=h - 4€; Sch, l iiree, f P. O. Box 436 fN gjLb+l��lf �1�1��Ci�1�la�ttl� G2635 (1436 Eliutbeth Hoblin Endicott Church 42"163 Minister Study 42"91 June 29,2001 Robin C.Giangregorio Site Plan review Coordinator Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Ref : Cotuit Post Office Dear Ms . Giangr®gorio, Mr Frank Penza, superintendent for McLean Construction Co. , Inc. the builder of the new Cotuit Post Office met with you on. Thursday June 28, 2001 , and informs me that due to problems with one abutter, the Town of Barnstable is not going to sign off on all requirements until they have some assurance from the owners, THE COTUIT FEDERATED CHURCH, that certain items be accomplished. First, The condenser units for the A.C. were only required by U.S.P.S. specifications to be enclosed by a chain link fence for security. We have contacted three local fence companys to obtain costs and availability of 6 ' 0" high stockade screen. fencing similar to that required to enclose the dumpster. The week of. July 02,2001 we will meet and award a contract for these items . We belive this fence around the A.C. units will eliminate most sounds and direct them up and away from the abutters. If this is not sufficient we look further. As for the rear slope area addressed by Ms. Darcy A. Karle, Conservation Agent for the Town of Barnstable, our attorney, Lisa Mycock Kelly received a message from her and has placed a call back to Ms Karle. This area has been seeded, however lack of rain and difficulty in watering this area has left it somewhat bare. We have spoken to the landscaper and are planning to put down a seeded matt to properly hold the banking . I hope these issues will not hold up our receiving a complete sign off for a permanent occupancy certificate as it is costing the church considerable money every day we do not close on the mortage . FiH�/29;�"<•'6wt1 �,'�:a .r_1G1 -3F�7-7nF�! - "."LARKF"��:� r?:JD It_T.� -_-G�- 03 14 if If you have any questions or issues with the above information please contact me at my office, in Barnstable at 508 362-6212. R. B. Scales Chairperson P.O. Building Committee I 05/2/2r 01 09:48 509-62-7_;57 C_ RX _"4-3 PRODUCT'S Pit;= 01 7 i . L EST aK, CORR IFIGIERID PROMS 3010 MAIN STREET, P.O. BOY, 1245 BARNSTA©LE, MA 02630.2250 TEL (508) 362-62;2 FAx (568) 362.7867 FAX TRANSMISSION REPORT TO Name: Robin C. Giangregorio FiAm: Town of Barnstable Ted: 508 862-4027 Fax: 508 790-6230 FROM Name- R. B. Scales Date: June 29, 2001 No. c4 pages (inc�lluung 00('PM page) T:�ree Re�Eten.eF: Cotuit Poet Office/Cotuit Federated Church Commen•L� i Sz��:cin{ 1nottuc:{dorv� r C4 OD'- ,a Lw P.O.BOX 771 COMM MA 02635 508-428-8623 June 28, 2001 Zoning Board of- Appeals 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA Dear Members of the Board: I am writing to bring to the Zoning Board of Appeals, atten- tion a special -permit violation. On September 27, 2000,a spe- cial permit(Appeal 2000-86) was granted to the Cotuit Federated Church to redevelop a site at 45 School St. , in order to redevelop the site for a new and expanded post office building. The board granted the special permit subject to terms and conditions, the first being that "the site shall be developed as per plans submitted. . . . . .". On the mechanical and electrical plans so submitted, the air conditioning units are clearly shown placed at the very back of the building. In vio- lation of the special permit, these units were wrongfully placed on the west side of the building facing my home. As a result, I and my family are presently, constantly agrieved by noise from the two industrial size air conditioning units. The town by-laws are specific concerning expansion of non-conform- ing use, that they be not "more detrimental to the neighbor- hood". At the time the redevelopment of this property was being considered, a group of abutters, myself included, care fully perused the plans and specifically noted the placement of the air conditioning units. After difficult negotiations, with the direct involvement of the town manager, the office of Congressman Delahunt and costly legal counsel, we were able to come to an agreement with the Cotuit Federated Church for the careful rede- velopment of the property in a way that would have no greater impact on our essentially residential neighborhood than what was being replaced, in accordance with the by-laws of the Town of Barnstable and conditions of the special permit. At the time of the Zoning Board of Appeals hearing on September 27, 2000, had the plan presented shown the air conditioning units in their present location, concerns would have been raised. I hereby urge you to enforce the terms of this special permit through the appropriate Town officer by ordering the removal of these air conditioning units to the site approved as per plans presented. Please respond to my request as soon as possible. Thank you for your kind attention in this matter. Respectfully, John Cira Copies sent: Office of the Town Clerk Office of the Building Commissioner OU JT E ID E TIE11H A 11:L1 .110ii[irri:c.,rrs 35 MEDFORD STREET PHONE: 617-628-0100 SUITE 301 FAX: 617-718-2003 SOMGRVILLE, MA02143 E-MAIL: SMTPHG N-QaCH@ERO0LS.COM WEB SITE: WWW.DES�GN-W�DE.COM 18 May 2001 Town of Barnstable Building Division 367 Main Street CERTIFICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL Hyannis,MA 02601 COMPLETION Attn: Mr.Mitchell Trott,Building Inspector REF: Cotuit Post Office Building-Cotuit,MA Dear Mr. Trott: The purpose of this letter is to Certify that as of the above date Substantial Completion for this project has reached and the building is ready for occupancy. To the best of my knowledge and belief all work performed in and for this project has been completed in substantial conformance with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Building Code-Sixth Edition, and other related codes applying to construction for this building. As stated previously in my monthly inspection report letters directed to you,this certification does not extend to the site/civil work performed on the site. This should be certified by the appropriate site/civil engineer. Therefore,would you please issue the appropriate Certificate of Occupancy to the general contractor and owner for this project. If you have any questions please give me a call. SUTPHN ASSOCIATES, INC. Niles O. Sutphin,AIA �\S�E ED ARcy�TF cc: R. Scales +McLean Const Co. v 'S 0. 2723 �. CAMUDGE, h py MASS. �J G OF MPSSP AFFILIATED OFFICES IN LOONDDON, EN.GLANDD AND BOC A RATON, FLORIDA I 1 J T SWTE 301 FAX: 617-718-2003 SOOMERVUE, MA02143 G-SAG L: SMTPH N-G°RCHOEROLS.COM 18 May 2001 Town of Barnstable Building Division 367 Main Street - Hyannis,MA 02601 Attn: Mr.Mitchell Trott,Building Inspector REY., Post s- A Vigil i :g-CfAUity-V2' ,, Dear Mr.Trott: As Substantial Completion has been reached on this project as of 18 May 2001,the purpose of this letter is to confirm to your office the following information: • POST OFFICE RENTAL BOX CAPACITY: This will confirm that the total number of Rental Mail Boxes actually installed in this facility is 1196. To the best of my knowledge and belief this conforms to the number of boxes allowed under Special Permit granted by the Town of Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals. • HVAC CONDENSER LOCATION: The original building permit drawings called for the air conditioning condenser units to be located at the far left side of the Front Elevation adjacent to the loading dock. Due to a storm drain washout in this location experienced during construction,the two HVAC condenser units have now been relocated to an area at the rear elevation of the building. Both units are mounted on a concrete slab designed for this purpose. This area will be secured by a metal or wood fence. If you bavP any q estiors please give.me-a call. SUTPIEN ASSOCIATES, INC. Jf 4 Niles O. Sutphin, AIA 5 0. s&;,. TFc� cc: R. Scales +McLean Const Co. o a N0. 2723,2 � CAtJ,I[?EilETGE, � a'0 , MASS.�fl �� pH of MPSSPG ar FUATED OFMCES oN LONDOON, CNGLAND AND BOOCA RATON, FLOR DQ J T�E P EPTivitc,mirriie cl.rrs 35 MEOFORDD STREET PHONE: 617-028-8900 SUITE 301 FAX: 017-618-2003 i SOOMERVILLE, MA 02143 E- JAG L: SUTPH N-6°RCG @EROLS.COM WEB SITE: WWW.DDESIGN-W�0E.COoM 3 May 2001 Town of Barnstable Building Division 367 Main Street Hyannis,MA 02601 Attn: Mr. Mitchell Trott,Building Inspector REF: Cotuit Post Office Building-Cotuit,MA Dear Mr. Trott: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a monthly summary of my Construction Observation visits to the job site during the month of April 2001,for the above subject project: • 14 April 2001: Exterior Rough Grading work has been started.All interior partitions have been completed. Suspended ceiling grid is 100%complete. Some lighting fixtures have been installed.Toilet Room accessories have been installed-but no plumbing fixtures are installed. VCT flooring is complete-no base installed.HVAC work is about 70%complete. • 21 April 2001: No additional site work has been accomplished.No additional plumbing work has.been done.HVAC`system about 85%complete. Some progress noted on installation of ceiling lighting-fixtures. Vinyl base 1000%completer Post.Office work stations and . counters are complete.Interior doors/frames complete.All exterior glazing and louvers are complete. • 28 April 2001: Some site work is in progress.All storm drain structures are installed. One additional retaining wall has been completed.Plumbing fixture are not installed.HVAC system is about 95%complete.No progress as yet on the installation of suspended lighting fixtures.All interior painting is complete.No progress on the completion of exterior painting.Nearly all interior finishes are complete,except for the installation of the final ceiling tile grid. The general Contractor has informed me brat ine project wii'r-reach aUbstantia Completion by 11 May 2001. I understand from the owner that the Post Office intends to occupy the facility shortly thereafter. To the best of my knowledge,information and belief all construction is being completed in accordance with the Permit Plans',and requirements of the Massachusetts Building Code-61h Edition.I cannot comment on the validity or adequacy of the engineered site work. SUTPHIN ASSOCIATES,INC. e - .; Niles O Sutphin; AIA S �R AR�y; ` c R.'Scales'+McLean Consf Co s;. O SJJ o No-,2723 2 OCMISRIDGE �- MASS. OF MPSSPG ' AFFILIATED OFFICES IN LOONDDOON, ENGLANDD AND BOC A RATON, FLORIDA 9 c�o EM7Aiitc1 mirriiv c,rr s 35 MEDFORDD STREET PHONE: 017-628-0900 SUITE 301 FAX: 617-718-2003 i SOOMERVILLE, MA02143 E-MAIL: SMTPH N-ARCH@ER LS.COM 2 April 2001 QED SITE: WWW.DEMGN-W�DE.COoM Town of Barnstable Building Division 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Attn: Mr. Mitchell Trott, Building Inspector REF: Cotuit Post Office Building-Cotuit,MA 11NZ11 1V11. Tr oft: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a monthly summary of my Construction Observation visits to the job site during the month of March 2001, for the above subject project: • 3 March 2001: There has been no additional site work completed since my last visit. All exterior windows (with one exception)have been installed. All interior partitions have been roughed-in. Exterior wall insulation has been started-about 25% complete. Some progress-on electrical,rough-in.was noted. HVAC work started. • 10 March 2001: All interior partition work completed-Gypsum Wallboard started -and _Js approximately 55%o complete. Exterior wall insulation-about 75% complete. HVAC duct work distribution started-about 25% complete. Exterior concrete base pad is poured for the two condenser units. All plywood security ceilings have now been installed. Electrical rough-in,work appears to be about 90% complete.• • 24 March 2001: GWB work—80% complete. Missing rear window is now installed, as are exterior aluminum glass doors at both building entrances. Concrete column footings/pedestals for the East Entry doors, and the rear service dock retaining wall/footings have been poured. HVAC work about 45% complete. • 31 March 2001: GWB work 95% complete. Electrical rough-in 99% complete. HVAC: two external condenser units installed but not connected to the main system, ductwork distribution appears to be complete with insulation wrap, Main boiler and AHU's not installed. Exterior wall insulation complete.No further progress noted on exterior painting, or site work To the best of my knowledge, information and belief all construction is being completed in accordance with the Permit Plans, and requirements of the Massachusetts Building Code-6ffi Edition. I cannot comment on the validity.or adequacy of the engineered site work.. SUTPHIN ASSOCIATES;INC. �E0.E0 AR • - S _ Niles O._Sutphin, AIA z� o� Scales+McLean Const Co No. 2723 OCAMBRIDGE, h MASS. J �FTH OF MPSSPG AFFILIATED OFFICES IN LI-OONDON, ENGLANDD AND BOCA RATOON, FLORIDA �D EPYi&111C9 111rr E(3.rrS 35 MEDFORDD STREET PHONE: 817-628=8100 SWTE 301 FAX: 617-718-2003 i SOMERVUE, MA02143 E=MAOL: SUTPHIN-ARCG @EROOLS,COOM WED S f E: WWW.DESS GN-Ww DDE.COM 2 March 2001 Town of Barnstable Building Division 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Attn: Mr. Mitchell Trott, Building Inspector REF: Cotuit Post Office Building-Cotuit,MA y j SCJVX l �Y Dear Mr. Trott: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a monthly summary of my Construction Observation visits to the job site during the month of February 2001, for the above subject project: •=�a3 February2001: Site work is well underway, and estimated to be about 55% complete.-The exterior _ wood framed walls; and roof trusses were about 90% completed. The General Contractor was advised to install the proper hurricane ties at roof trusses, and to install wood shims at all locations where exterior studs do not not actually make contact with the bottom sill plate-about 40-50 locations. • 17 February 2001: Met with the owner, Mr. Robert Scales to review job progress to date. Exterior wood framing and roof shingles were 100% complete. Exterior wood trim was about 75% finished. Bevel wood siding was about 25% complete.No progress on site work., Interior wood partition framing begun. • 24 February 2001: All exterior siding,'trim, roofmg 100% complete. Plumbing roughs started-about 75% finished. Electrical roughs about 50% complete. Interior llaiuil(iHN ULIVUL i i'/o. Dx.lel'io1 painting- is about 25 io i;(SiClpleie. To the best of my knowledge, information and belief all construction is being completed in accordance with the Permit Plans, and requirements of the Massachusetts Building Code-6`h Edition. I cannot comment on the validity or-adequacy of the engineered'site work. SUTPHIN ASSOCIATES, INC. Niles'O Cc;Robert Scales and McLean Construction Co. aFMUA EDD OFMCES N LONDDOON, ENGLAND AND BOOC A I ATOON, FLOfflDG°a IP 35 MEDFOORDD STREET PHONE: 097-028-8100 SMITE 301 COAX: 697=718-2003 011 SOMEG3MILLE, MA02943 E-f1AVL: SMTPG�N-aWCH@ER0oLS.COM WEB CUTE: WWW.DDESIGN-w�DE.COOM 2 February 2001 Town of Barnstable Building Division 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 VIA FAX Attn: Mr. Mitchell Trott, Building Inspector REF: Cotuit Post Office Building-Cotuit,MA Dear Mr. Trott: The purpose of this letter is to let you know that Sutphin Associates, Inc. is the Architect of Record for the above referenced project. I had previously visited the job site with the general contractor several times prior to the start of construction. Site work and construction of the building'was actually begun toward the end of December 2000. This letter will confirm that I have personally visited the job site during the rAi— of"January on'43-"January and 27 January 2001. • 13 January 2001: Site work was well underway, and estimated to be about 20% complete. Proper hay bales were installed at the rear of the site to prevent silting and soil erosion. Concrete footings and foundation walls were about 80% complete. All; newly poured concrete was being adequately protected by frost blankets. • 27 January 2001: Site work was still ongoing. I estimate site work to be ab04 6%' complete. All concrete footings and foundation walls were 100% complete. All concrete floor slabs have been poured-100% complete. All concrete floor slabs were adequately covered by insulated frost blankets. All wood roof trusses were delivered to the job, however no wood wall framing had started at the time of this inspection. To the best of my knowledge, information and belief all construction is being completed in accordance with the Permit Plans, and requirements of the Massachusetts Building Code-6 h Edition. - SUTPFIIN ASSOCIATE C. ` t S,��RED qR ti / �V 0.186 , Tct Y, Niles O. Sutphin,AIA 2� No. 2723 2 . � CAm®. � fumCcE, O� MASS. �F9�TM FSSPG� Of M AFFILIATED OFFICES IN LOONDDOON, ENGLAND AND BOOC A RATON, FLORIDA 1 d�. .a a' d I' w� 0 i l r -A-41VA-WA MEW w tj luf. :,61� j I I� r 102 4 2 Off Street Parking Regulations 1 4-2 . 1 Purpose 1 It is the purpose of this section that all new, expanded or intensified uses within the town provide adequate off-street parking. 4-2 .2 Application No use shall be intensified, except for single-family detached dwellings, without providing adequate off-street parking as provided herein. 4-2 .3 Computation Existing parking spaces may be counted to meet the minimum off-street parking requirements for an intensified use only if it can be demonstrated that they are not used as of right by existing uses and are exclusively available as of right for said proposed intensification., 4-2 . 4 Location All off-street parking spaces required by this section shall be located on the same lot as the use for which such spaces are required, except that in non-residential districts, parking spaces may be located on another lot within three hundred (300) feet of, and in the same Toning district as the use for which such spaces are required. * 472--5 Design/Screening Standards i 1) Each off-street parking space shall have minimum dimensions of nine (9) by twenty (20) feet excluding the driveway to j such space. i 2) Drainage facilities for each parking area shall be designed and constructed to -contain storm. water run-off on the premises. 1 3) Parking areas for five (5) or more cars shall be designed with enough maneuvering space so that vehicles need not back onto a public way. 4) (Deleted by unanimous Roll Call vote of the Town Council on item 99-056 on March 11, 1999) . � ? [: 5') No parking lot shall be illuminated so as to causeiglar_e ,for�� -- motorists, pedestrians or neighboring premises . . i 6_) (Deleted b r y unanimous Roll Call vote of the Town Council { II on item 99-056 -on March 11, 1999) . ; I i 4-2 . 6 Landscape Re p Requirements for Parking. Lots I: I � P Tatuit Yeb erateb Cnl urc UU 40 Scli.)ol slreoi P. n. Box 43G '( atuit. f ttssac4usetts 02635.0436 Elizabeth Hoblin Endicott Church 428-6163 Minister Study 428-6491 Building Commissioner, Ralph Crossen Town of Barnstable, Massachusetts Building Services Division 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Dear Commissioner Crossen, In accordance with your request , at the Site Plan Review meeting on April 27, 2000, L have enclosed much of the information you requested. In the summer of 1998 Kathleen Walker , Real Estate Specialist/Team Leader, Eastern Service Team of the United States Postal Service, Windsor, CT contacted Joyce Howard, Chairperson of the Trustees of THE COTUIT FEDERATED CHURCH to discuss a -new Post Office for the Village of Cotuit . (see letter enclosed) . In the fall of 1998 the USPS forwarded a set of drawings of the building they would like build on the existing site, for the Trustees to review. This building was a 40A building (± 4, 700 sq ft. ) . They then had Engineers McKinnell ,. McKinnell , & Taylor ' review the site to ascertain if the building proposed would in fact fit on the existing site. (see copy of-McKinnell , McKinnell, & Taylor drawing) . On Friday October 30, 1998, Kathleen Walker called to. tell us- of a meeting she wanted regarding the Cotuit Post Office on November 03, 1998 . However we did not know that the meeting was at the Town Hall until that morning. {see the writers notes on the meeting held on. November .03, 1998. On December 15, 1998 they held an open meeting at Freedom Hall, Cotuit which Mr. Thomas Day conducted. (Cape Cod Times article included) . Later in the Spring of 1999, after concerns of the neighbors, we finally convinced the USPS they 'could comfortably exist with a 30A building (± 3 , 267 sq ft bldg. ) . This is the building just approved by the Site . Plan Review Committee. Any questions please contact the writer. Sincere Robert "B. Scales Chairperson Post Building Committee -11/22/2000 17:19 508-420-0117 PADGETT BUILDERS INC _ PAGE 01 FADGM BUILDERS, INC. 184 School Street ssraarr aaeaa w F.O. Box 133 - = -- e - :.. =_ COTUIT, MASSACHUSETTS 02635 -- -LETW �Ax CsoQ�� 2U Ofi� (508) 428.0001 CIA rs :.:.�.L� L2a ............ .. . ► 1�- ll. u1 ti71'r.�,� . L 7 L.1 Y�f1+ {� ............. t c ...::...:...:...,....,..... t ' �.........._. H l ............................._... _ . . . ........... a�F-- __... `aR -!th�.� ............................................_..............._...... 15- .1c�>~ �� Y .�rY1, .i. rT► ...._.Tt�......... ... L ..... �tY ... .... .. 'S ... ......._..... -..............................._.._..._......_......................._.............................,,,...._.......... ,..,::.....:,.,,:,:, ........ .t ...._ M ._...........:.. . ......................... .. L....-'..._.. .. - :,....._,�.:._:............... ...... �ati�, �� c.... s� .. ........ ��...... - :.W,.,.:.................._.........._................... ..._................ _ _---.._. ........ � �,..._. - ..._....... E......... ................�.� ................_................. Tiur . � . _ -I - -_ _.. - T► :.�� - -. .... . ...... ............................. �... :.r�_................ .......:::., .:: ....... .._'............. ........... i :. t (� Please Reply ❑ No Reply Necessary StGNEO 49%Pro-0ono m9i G9ntonk•f v4 PoshC cra�mor Montt i l 11/22/2000 17:19 508-420-0117 PAN-ETT BUILDERS INC PAGE 02 �-0 kit ' Z4, :VVV 11 -,;A rAA OVV LO.v 140i * 0&1,IVJVIN 1'ALA.I. iA"J-VJlJ The COxx MOnwealth ®f MassachuseM �t'iliialn Francis Galvin,Secretary of tine Cornrnonwe,dth July 2U,2000 Massachusccts Mstoricad Cotnmissior, Kathleen Walker 17".Estate Specialist U.S. Postal Service 6 Gr►fffin Road Nortb Windsor,"V 06006.0300 RE: Praposed Post Office ConsDruction,45 School Street,Bunstab,elCotuit„ MA (NI ViCh 230.14) Dear!vis. Wa';ker Tbank you for submitti�the additional information crnceruiug the proNscd cons'trvction of anew postal facility o,the above refm'mccd site. The proposed project site is located with, n d,e Cotuit Village Center historic area and adjacent to several properties listed bi the National[register of Historic Places. ►UiC. staff kusvc reviewed the suortiltted information including 001tsvaction documents prcpaaed by Sutphin Associates, in c. of Soaizrvil:e,MA datedins May 1,2000. 1t is understood from these pla that the proposed facility will be a single-story building with. approximately 3650 s.f of interior wren. The building exterior wi;I be entirely clad with painted wood clapboard siding and wood trim. Wiadowa will be thermal-glazed aluminum units with true divided ligbts. After reviaw of die materials, [concur to a finding of no adverse effect for this action!36 CFR 800.5(d). lhesc comments are provided to 8.4sist in compliance with Section 106. of the National Historic Preservation Act(3E CFR 800). If you have questions, piease coatact Pau; Holtz at this ogee. "thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, v di 3. McDonough Eucu ive Director �1155:iCrt C;tis Historical Conuuis$ioc State Historic Prescrvatiou Otticer cc* Barnstable}•50rieal CO nmissioa Jtuncs Gould,Cotuit Fbstorical Cornmjsslotl Bitl Moncrie€, USPS 220 McrriSsci- doulcv'ard 5won,M.assachusett_5 021,25 (617) '727.8470 O"1VV".Stat1--.M2.uslseclm1.1C A f M0.704 P.1/3 hIOV.17.2©Bed 11: aSRM PLRi�}NING gown of.Barnstable Historic 'reservation Division sue¢e, 23.0 South,Street,Hy utis,Massachusetts 02601 TEL: 508-86Z-46661 FAX: 508-862.4725 Fax Cover Sheet . a Dade: 'Time: J To: Phone: Company:— Fax. t , From: T RE: CC: Number of pages including cover sheet Message: r r . f 11/17/2000 To: Mitch Trott, Inspector From: R. Giangregorio Re: Construction of new otuit Post Office facility Mandated compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (36 CFR 800) Pat Anderson informed me that the there is an agreement with the State Historic Commission designating the building to be clad with red cedar shingles and natural wood products. Pat will fax over a copies of a letter from the Mass Historic Commission and a report from the Cotuit Civic Association. i ti The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William.Francis Galvin,Secretan•of the Commonwealth January 7, 2000 Massachusetts Historical Commission c - Kathleen Walker Real Estate Specialist U.S.Postal Service 6 Griffin Road North Windsor,CT 06006-0300 RE: . Proposed Post Office Co nstruction,45 School Street,Barnstable/Cohut, MA WC#23014) Dear Ms.Walker Thank you for submittingthe � .additional information received December 10, 1999,concerning the proposed construction of a new postal facility on the above referenced site. The Village Center within the COtuit Proposed project site is located historic area and adjacent to Register of Historic Places. several properties listed in the National MHC staff determined in a letter dated January 24, 1999,that the �='=t conO;+:emil on�e AMC•� �'0po�Project would have no adverse MHC staff have reviewed the and sdog elevation drawings describing the new construction. submitted drawings dated 7/1/99 and 916199 describing the proposed new PasW facilit. UM �'are currently unable to approve these plans as vinyl siding and aluminum window sash is not pn The proposed use of alternative plans which would involve the used appropriate sore traditional ding boric ' Please develop clapboards and painted wood window sash. materials such as painted .wood compatibility of the new MHC staff will evaluate these plans based upon the constmction to the surrounding historic area. These comments .are _provided to assist in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act(36 CFR 800). If yo ve questions,please contact me at this office. Thank you for your cooperation. S* , T71 Paul A.Holtz Historical Architect Massachusetts Historical Commission cc: Barnstable Historical Commission James Gould,Cotuit Historical Commission Bill MoncrieC USPS 220 Morrissey Boulevard,Boston,Massachusetts 02125 • (617) 727-8470 Fax:(617) 727o5128 .TDD: 1-800-392-6090 www.state.ma.us/se%nbc /� /4rm LA-tf io ,;//e R. r NOV.17.2000 11:55AN PLANNING NO.704 P.2/3 4 S y E The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin,Secretary of the Commonwealth July 20,2000 Massachusetts Historical Commission Kathleen Walker Real Estate Specialist U.S.Postal Service 6 Griffin Road North Windsor,CT 06006-0300 RE: Proposed Post Office Construction,45 School Street,BamstableXotuit, MA (MHC#23014) Dear Ms.Walier Thank you for submitting the additional information concerning the proposed construction of a new postal facility on the above referenced site. The proposed project site is located within the Cotuit Village Center historic area and adjacent to several properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places. MHC staff have reviewed the submitted information including construction documents prepared by Sutphin Associates, Inc. of Somerville,MA dated May 1,2000. It is understood from these plans that the proposed facility will be a single-story building with approximately 3650 st of interior area. The building exterior will be entirely clad with painted wood clapboard siding and wood trim. Windows will be thermal-glazed aluminum units with.true divided lights. After review of the materials,I concur to a finding of no adverse effect for this action(36 CFR 800.5(d). Those comments are provided to assist in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act(36 CFR 300). If you have questions,please contact Paul Holtz at this ogee. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, di S.McDonough Executive Director Massachusetts Historical Commission State Historic Preservation Officer cc: Barnstable Historical Commission James Could,Cotuit Historical Conuri$sion Bill Moncrief,USPS 220 iiorrissey BouleN ard,Boston,Dlassaclzuserts 02125 • (617) 727-8470 rvw w-state,ma.uslsecJmhc NOV.17.2®aa 11:56AM PLANNING N0.704 P.3i3 PETER I IICrQ1dAN 1000 MAIN STREET P.O.BOX 528 CO'T=,MA 02635 , Mr. Robert Scales July 24,' 2000 Chairman, Building committee Cotuit Federated. Church P.O. Box 436 Cotuit, MA 02635 Dear Bob: The exterior appearance of the new Cotuit post office .is a matter of concern to the residents of our small village. I congratulate your committee on all that you have already accomplished in this regard. However, I do have two suggestions which I ask you to consider: SIDING: In the Civic Association meeting on July 22, I believe you said that the siding would be red cedar. clapboard. . It wasn't clear be/ whether this was to/stained or left in its natural state. T have had some experience with red cedar siding on a Cape Cod house. it seems to he subject to mildew and uneven discoloration and fading. Also, this kind of clapboard (red cedar) siding would not be compatible with other buildings in and around the village center. My recommendation: Good quality cedar shingles, stained grey or left.to weather naturally. , Or: wood clapboard apainted grey. Combined with white trim, either of the above would fit well with the existing architectural character of the village. SIGN: The elevation drawing showed a large, "jazzy", advertising- type U.S. Postal Service sign in a prominent position on the front of the building. This might be acceptable in a large town or mall, but would be out of place in this village. I hope you can persuade the Postal Service to abandon this sign, and replace it with black lettering on a white background similar to the present signage. I think most people who have lived in this. village for some time - or who grew up here - are, comfortable with the way things look and don't like noticeable change. These siding and sign suggestions -are details that merit attention! Sincerely, cc: Rob Ray McGregor, Acting President, Cotuit Civic Association L,�Patricia Anderson, Director, Historic Preservation, Town of Barnstable - Jim Gould, Historian I NOV-07-2000 TUE 11 :06 AM COLONIALGAS FAX NO. 508 760 7611 P. 02 .A Bostoges 201 Hivermaor Street Uit1 West Roxbury.Massachusetts 02132 Tel 611J23-5512 Essexges'..;Colonial°gas Eastern Enrerpnses November 6, 2000 Steve Mciair FAX: 508-398-3185 re; 45 School Street, Cotuit Post Office, Cotuit, MA To Whom It May Concern, This letter is to confirm that the natural gas services to the above referenced property have been cut and capped at the gatebox. This work was completed by us on November 4, 2000. If you have any questions, I can be contacted directly at 508-760-7503. Sincerely, l� Sally Sinclair Y Distribution Department , Commonwealth Electric Company n 2421 Cranberry Highway Wareham, Massachusetts CON Sk,wd ODE Telephone (508)291 0950 2571 November 1, 2000 To Whom. it May Concern: Please be advised that service and meter have been removed from 45 School Street, Cotuit, Mass. j Sincerely, Karen Corriveau Customer Service Rep. I °` tiFa Cotuit ,Fire iztrict CffW Mater Mepartment D 1926 4300 FALMOUTH ROAD, P.O. BOX 451 JU V COTUIT, MASS. 02635 PHONE (508) 428-2687 FAX (508) 428-7517 November 1, 2000 Dear Sirs: This letter confirms that the Post Office building, located at 45 School Street; Cotuit, has been turned off. Please contact us at 428-2687 the morning of the demolition so that we can remove water service materials from the site before demolition begins. Sincerely, Leonard Mendes Superintendent 0 , u_ SIC ... STANDARD LEGEND_4 NOTE:not all symbols will appear on a mop ..:... . GOLF COURSE SE FAIRWAY r '� l _..._.......— ------ J /: ,`! .. j4 EDGE OF DECIDUOUS TREES I --- ' - EDGE OF BRUSH 1 MA 35 � ORCHARD OR NURSERY 1 t 1 MAP 35 I '-" - V EDGE OF CONIFEROUS TREES MAP 35 L..._.__..........1 _ _ - MARSH AREA #''33 MAP 35 '# 59 ,... i 7 EDGE OF WATER # 87. `---.... .._ = DIRT ROAD DRIVEWAY PARKING LOT PAVED ROAD r I --__ PAT DRAINAGE DITCH f -MAP-35 _ # 925_ i-_..._.:.._.._.__.:_``....• / RAIL H T ---' PARCEL LINE * nuRna F---MAP# 1 - _ ^ )T E —PARCEL NUMBER # 71 - ) i #1860—HOUSE NUMBER 2 FOOT CONTOUR LINE MAP 35 MAP 35 14 .............t� ........ I _ Elevation arse on 29 1 O(110 FOOT CONTOUR LINE # 933 based NGVD # 45 `,•�4.9 SPOT ELEVATION _ STONE WALL ;. .............X FENCE RETAINING WALL •...._ , 4 _; RAIL ROAD TRACK MAP 35 -= - STONE JETTY / \ SWIMMING POOL { %? # 941 PORCH DECK ' ;. /... H/ "i BUILDING/STRUCTURE MAR,35 MAP 35 i S , DOCK/PIER i # 58 # 46 ! MAP 35 HYDRANT 1 i ��. e VANE O MANHOLE 957 l AR3 O MAP 35 r' FLAG POLE G O POST T O W .N O F B A R N S T A B L E G E O G R A P H I C 1 N F O R M A T 1 O N S Y S T E M S U N 1 T p SIGN ® STORM DRAIN N PRINTED SCALE:IN FEET *NOTE: This map is an enlargement of a **N OTE: The parcel lines are only graphic representations DATA SOURCES: Planimetrics(man-made features)were interpreted from 1995 aerial photographs by The James y r- 1"=100'scale mop and may NOT meet of property boundaries. They are not true locations,and W.Sewall Company.Topography and vegetation were interpreted from 1989 aerial photographs by GEOD 0 UTILITY POLE n TOWER ` 0 40 80- National Map Accuracy Standards at this do not represent actual relationships to physical objects Corporation. Planimetrics,topography,and vegetation were mapped to meet National Map Accuracy Standards ' enlor ed scale. on the ma at a scale of 1" 100'. Parcel lines were digitized from 2000 Town of Barnstable Assessor's lax mops. O ELECTRIC BOX s IIN(H=80fEET* g P g p' ,� -- - - - --- --T. �.___ __.. �i�� / , ��-� �'° �� ? ��- _Z 1 Town of Barnstable Legal Department-Town Attorneys'.Office 367 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601-3907 Inter-Office Memorandum Robert D. Smith,Town Attorney Office: 508-862-4620 Ruth J.Weil, 1st Assistant Town Attorney ;<< Fax: 508-862-4724 Claire Griffen,Paralegal/Legal Assistant T.David Houghton,Assistant Town Attorney Terri Cahalane,Legal Clerk Date: July 17, 2000 To: Ralph Crossen, Building Commissione From: Robert D. Smith, Town Attorney Subject: Cotuit Post Office , Legal Ref. #2000-0161 '* I have reviewed the documents you have supplied me from Margaret E. Harper, Esq. and from Thomas G. Day, both of whom are with the United States Postal Service, the former being an attorney with the same, and the latter being the district manager. I know that Ms. Harper describes, generally; the implications all of the supremacy clause i of the United States Constitution with respect to the subject location of the U.S. Post Office facilities. I also note that Mr. Day, in his ultimate paragraph recites that "the sole a> issue ofT'fede�al jurisdiction' has to do-with the use of this building. It will be used as fh� Cotuit-Post Office and thus I ask that it be:considered novas a commercial building but! (rather as-,governmental building It is my understanding this would be an approved used as currently zoned. Other than this one assertion of federal jurisdiction, I would expect the developer to comply with the rest of your normal approval process." I do not discern here an unequivocal assertion of federal supremacy. Indeed, Mr. Day recites that he believes that the building would be a governmental building. If the building were to be owned by the U.S. Postal Service, there would be no question of this and we could conclude the matter here. However, given the leasehold nature of the tenancy, that is not possible. The statement that he understands this to be an [2000-01611orosnans] 2 "approved used as currently zoned" is, in fact, inaccurate. Governmental uses, like religious uses, are "exempt" from the provisions of zoning and cannot and should not be characterized as being "approved." T pp o accept a characterization of such a building as an "approved" use, as opposed to an "exempt" use, would have serious adverse implications on the town arising from the status the building would acquire as a "pre- existing nonconforming use." An "approved" use would, in fact, acquire a legal, nonconforming status, whereas "exempt" uses (which is our position), do not acquire such status. The bottom line, Ralph, is that I7wou d,at the very least;Iike`to see a much,, ilea' r and-less equivocal assertion of federal jurisdiction if we are to rely upon it. (And, of course, it would be important to preserve the documents relating to this entire exchange in the file relating to the property. Presumably, some sort of flag should be put on this in the geographic information system). Only then can we be in a position to demand that the property revert to the underlying zoning, or to a use which is exempt as,an actual religious use, if and when the lease with the United States Postal Service is terminated. Noawithstanding_the forego ngstfie pggal personnel-have at the very least,provided some documentation for their position. It is, as it always is in cases like Ithis;up to you to make the call ,Y must evaluate whether or not the assertion is as clear as you would like it to be. Finally, if we do proceed based onthese documents, the permit which issues should probably explicitly show on its face that the building is to be used as a United Stated Post Office and for no other use, whether similar or not. Also, the tidbits I have been given of the provenance of the building and its use create some glimmers of a concept of a pre-existing non-conforming use. I have not explored that as an alternative, but, properly documented, it may exist. RLS:cg . r [2000-01611crosnans] _ G-. I�, ��` �.� - i C l.V . i 3 �� a �� ` ,�; , , �� y� . , { _� � ,�,' Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services BAENSrABL& ' Thomas F.Geiler,Director 059. �,y• � - Building Division GOT, Ralph Crossen,Building Commissioner 367 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 TO: Attorney Robert Smith FROM: Ralph Crossen,Building Commissioner DATE: July 14,2000 RE: Applicability of Local Zoning of United States Postal Service Attached is a letter from the United States Postal Service law office that apparently asserts Federal Jurisdiction. I would like an opinion in writing if their project,already approved at site plan review,is exempt from zoning. All"reasonable regulation"issues(parking,setbacks)have been met in the opinion of site plan review. cc: John Klimm,Town Manager Tom Geiler,Director,Regulatory Services Attach. q/bldg/wpfiles/commis/leters/opinions/g000714a � 1 • �UNIrEDSMYES PGSTGLSFRVKE _- WWOSOR LAW GFFICB July 13, 2000 Transmission via fax: 508-790-6230 Ralph Crossen Building Inspector Barnstable RI Re: Applicability,of Local Zoning to United States Postal Service Dear Mr. Crossen: As attorneys for the United States Postal Service, we have been asked by Kathleen Walker, Postal Service Real Estate Specialist, to write to you setting forth the position of the Postal Service relative to local zoning and land use regulations. Let me preface my comments by noting that the policy of the Postal Service. as set forth in its regulations and its contracts. is to require compliance with state and local building codes. It is also our practice to obtain, if possible, suitable zoning of property we acquire for postal use. Generally, we have been able to comp.y with — zoning, tiuridmgFcooe, and permit requirements to the satisfaction of local governments. Despite this voluntary compliance with the substance of local requirements, based on the rationale set forth below, we maintain that the Postal Service complies as a matter of policy rather than from a legal obligation to do so. The Supremacy Clause, U.S. Const.Art.VI, Cl. Z, sRecifies that"[tjhis Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance - thereof... shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." "Federal Statutes thus prevail over local regulations when the two collide cr are otherwise inconsistent-in their effects." Don't Tear It Down Inc v Pennsylvania Avenue Deveioorrent Comoration, 642 F. 2d 527, 533 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (citations omitted). 6 GRIFFiN ft-0 NORr*► NMOSOR, CT O8W6-012D 860-285-7371 ,Fax: 660.28.1-397 The United State.S Constitution empowers Congress"to establish.Post Offices and Pest Roads." U.S. Const. Art. 1, § 8, Cl. 7. Pursuant to this constitutional authority, Congress,through the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, P.L. 91-375, 84 Stat. 719, Aug. 12, 1970 (Title 39, U.S. Code) (hereinafter"PRA")created the United States Postal Service as an independent establishment of the executive branch of the Govemment of the United States." 39 U.S.C. § 201,to provide"a basic and fundamental service...to the people by the Government of the United States."39 U.S. C. § 101. It is the responsibility of the Postal Service,inter alia, to establish and maintain postal facilities of such character and in such locations that postal patrons throughout the Nation will, consistent with reasonable economies of postal operations, have ready access to essential postal services. 39 U.S.C. §403(b)(3). 1n planning and building new postal facilities the Postal Service must emphasize the need for facilities and equipment designed to�eate desirable working conditions for its officers and employees, a maximum degree of convenience for efficient postal services, proper access to existing and future air and surface transportation facilities and control of casts to the Postal Service. 39 U.S.C:§101(g). In order to enab''e the Postal Service to fulfill the foregoing responsibilities. the Postal Service is empowered by the PRA to acquire, in any lawful manner, such personal or real property it deems necessary or convenient in the transaction of its business; to hold. maintain. sell, lease, or otherwise dispose of such property or any interest therein;to provide services in connection therewith and charges therefore, 39 U.S.C. §401(5); and to construct, operate, lease and maintain buildings, facilities, equipment, and other improvements on any property owned or controlled by it. 39 U.S.C. §401(6). In addition, the Postal Service is specifically empowered to determine the need for post offices, and to provide such offices as it aetermines are needed. 39 U.S.C. §404(a)(3). L In sum, Congress has empowered the Postal Service to determine the need for its facilities, where to site its facilities, and whether to lease or own such.facilities. "Absent express Congressional consent,where the legal incidence of state or local regulations falls upon the Federal Government or its instrumentalities, such is prohibited by the Supremacy Clause." United States v Wi Town of ndsor, 496 F. Supp. 581. 5e8'(D. CT 1980), citing united States-v. Tax Commissioner of Mississi i,421 U.S. 599. 96 S. CI. 1872,44 L. Ed. 2d. 404(1975I t ,U�ited States y. County of Allechenv. 322 U.S. 174, 64 S. Ct. 908, 88 L. Ed. 1209(1944); Manco a County v. Valley Bank: 318 U.S. 357, 63 S. CL. 587, 87 L. Ed. 334 (1943); Ha v. Train 426 U.S. 1167, 96 S. Ct. 2006, 48 L. Ed.2d 555 (1976); M United States, 319 U.S. 441, 63 S. Ct. 1137. 87 L. Ed. 1504(1943). "No case law derogates from the conclusion that absent an express Congressional mandate, there is immunity from regulation when the terms of such regulation requires its imposition on the Government, its mstrumentaliities or its property, as a matter of law." Windsor, 496 F. Supp at 589. In matters involving the selection of sites for post offices,*the decision whether to tease or own, and the construction of post Offices. W�meased or Owned,romstate there has been no such"clear Congressional mandate 9 or local regulations. See e. Thanet Co ora ' n v.the BoardD A1969, ent("The f the Townsnio of Princeton, 249 A.2d 31, affd 260 A. 2d (N.J.' App. United States Government,whether as owner or lessee, is immune trorn local zoning ordinances.j;Townshin of Middletown v N/E Regional Office, United States 25 (D. N.J. 1985)., Stewart v. United States Postal Postal Service; 601 F. Supp- 1 Service; 508 F..Supp. 112 (N.D. Cal. 1980); Crivello V. Board of Adiustmen of the Borou h of Middlesex, 183 F. Supp. 826 (D. N.J. 1960); Breeze v.Town of Bethlehem, 151 Misc. 2d 230. 573 N.Y-S. 2d 122 (Sup Ct, NY 1991). *±'The court finds that plaintiffs project to construct a building on privately owned land.-for use as United States Postal Service, a post office, pursuant to a lease agreement with the is immune from state and local zoning and land regulations.'; Durkin v. Board of Aot eats of Falmouth, 21 Mass.App.450, 438 N.E.2d 6 (App. Ct. Mass. 1986) (where court recognized that a use of property as a post office under a lease is immune from application of local land use regulations); United States Pasta{ Service v. Tcwn of Greenyxigh. Connecticut, 901 F.Supp. 500 (D. Ct. 1995) (the Town may not impose the state building code or the.building permit fee schedule on the Postal Service); But:see Montgomery v Town Sherburne, 514 A.2d 702 (VG 1986) (where court assumed, without holding,that Postal Service was immune from local regulation, but on the facts before it,found"legal incidence' of local reguiation feli on private citizen). The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution Article`A. Clause 2, was cited in the early case of McCullo h v. tdla Land, 4 Wheat. 316 (1819) as the basis for striking down state attempts to tax instrumentalities of the United States.A century late, it was applied by the Supreme Court to prevent a state firom ievyirg fines or otherwise interfering where a driver of a U.S. Mail Truck, in the performance of his official duties, operated the truck without having obtained a license from the state. Johnson v. Maryland: 254 U.S. 51 (1920). In Arizona v. Cal ifomia, 283 U.S. 423, 751_ Ed. 1154 (1930). the Court held - that the Secretary of the Interior was under no obligation to submit plans and r Dam project to the State Engineer for approval. spec iications for the Boulde Where, as in the case of local zoning and land use regulations, the legal incidence of such regulations falls on the edeUl government fled States or of lNi eo or'. such is ti prohibited by the Supremacy Cla se 498 F. Supp. 581 A Ct. 1980). Absent congressional consent, direct state ►egu'ation of an activity of the federal government is barred by the Supremacy Clause. United States v. Town of U'fndsor Connecticut 765 F. 2d 16 (2nd Cir. 1.o5j- 860255?357 WI _ NA LL In local zoning and land use regulation matters, as in Town of'Alin ds ncee the impact of the local regulation determination fall ndto she tectly he acil'ityn the saslwel as lease it To Postal Service has made .he determ manner to deny permission to allow the Town to enforce its zoning re�a etd by the Postal serviceis essentially io build a leased postal facility on the site rovisions directlY against the C equivalent to allao%ing the Town to en`tit tion CS theprecludes such enforcement- . Govemrnent. The United States o 'n 1 Postal Service facilities, either leased or owned. are not subject Accordingly,y, to local zoning and lard.use regulations. l yf ou wish to discuss this matter further, or should you m at Sny u stions, ' . or if I can be of further assistance on this matter. please call t Very truly yours, Margaret E. Harper --_ Attorney F cc: Kathleen Walker Windsor Facilities Service Office -'-- -j 07L14�'?&110 13:33 4012766867 PROVIDENCE DISTRICT u- Southeast New England Performance Cluster UNITED STATES .- POSTAL SERVICE July 14, 2000 Mr. Ralph Crossen Building Inspector To�,vn of'Samstable Ba nstable, MA 02630 Dear Mr. Crossen' The U.S. Postal Service has determined that the Cotuit Post Office building is,.as it currently exists,.inadequate-to our needs. The building is simply too small to safely house all of the operations necessary to perform postal services for the residents of-Cotuit. As.such, we began a process:.nearly two.years ago to determine an alternative to the current situation. Included in,our process was written,notification as well.as a face to face meeting, with TO.mn Officials in Barnstable. %We 'further held a public meeting to solicit comments from the public. In the'end, it was our determination that the best alternative available was the construction of a new and enlarged facility at the.current location. While the new faoility.will be app(oximately double the size of the Current Post Office, it is not of the size we had initially proposed'. Based upon public input we downsized the new office to the minimum size we believe can be viable. Thus, in the and we elected to remain at the current location in a new facility of the smallest possible size. it is my understanding that during a Site Plan Review meeting on April 27, 2000 the"assertion of federal jurisdiction"was raised. I want to be clear what, if any,.jurisdiction is being asserted on the part of the U.S. Postal Service: This is particularly important, since I committed to both Town Officials and the Public.that we wauld submit our project to the normal approval p rocess required in'the Down of Barnstable. The sole issue of"federal jurisdiction" has to do with the use of this building. It will be used as the Cotuit Post Office and thus 1 ask that it be considered not as a commercial building, rather as a governmental building. it is my understanding this would.be an approved use as currently zoned. Other than this one assertion of.federal jurisdiction, I.would expect the developi=r to comply with \ the rest of your normal approval process.. Very truly yours, Thomas G. Day . District Manager Cc: Mark Forrest,Office of Congressman Delahunt Kathleen Walker,NEA Real Estate Specialist 24 CORLI53 STREET pFIomomm.RI 02904-9995 401,276-6950 Fns: 401-270.6067 1 07/13/2000 16:01 8602357397 WINDSOR 1.44J USPS 01 UNITED SMYE5 t 1'65TIsLSEfIV10E "� WINOSOR LAW W OFFICE * ••» July 13, 2000 r, i 4 j Transmission via fax: 508-790-6230 Ralph Crossen Building Inspector Barnstable RI Re: Applicability of Local Zoning to United States Postal Service Dear Mr. Crossen: As attorneys for the United States Postal Service, we have been asked by Kathleen Walker, Postal Service Deal Estate Specialist, to write to you setting forth the position of the Postal Service relative to local zoning and land use regulations. Let me preface my comments by noting that than Folicy.of the' Postal Service, -as""set forth in its regulations and its contracts, is to require compliance with state ',,and local building codes. It is also our practice to obtain, if possible, suitable zoning of property we adquire for postal use. Generally, we have been able to comply with zoning, building cede, and permit requirements to the satisfaction of local governments. Despite this voluntary compliance with the substance of local requirements, based on the rationale set forth.below, we maintain that the Postal Service complies as a matter of policy rather than from a legal obligation to do so. The Supremacy Clause, U.S. Const- Art. VI, Cl, 2, specifies that °[t]his Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof... shall be the supreme Law of the Land- and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or.Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding '°Federal Statutes thus prevai[over local,regulations when the two collide or are otheivvise inconsistent in their effects.°° Don't Tear It Down. Inc., v. Pennsylvania Avenue Deveioprnent Qorporation, 642 1", 2d 527, 533 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (citations omitted). 6 GRiFFw RoAL3.NoRrH a4nrn,;aP, cT o6006-oi o 860-288-7a7i F-AX: 860-285-7397 x 07/13/2000 1S:% 8602857397 WIND.SOR LAW LISPS PAGE 02 The United States Constitution empowers Congress "to establish Lost Offices and Post Roads." U.S. Const, Art. 1, § 8, Cl. 7. Pursuant to this constitutional authority, Congress, through the Postal Reorganization:Act of 1970, P.L. 91-375, 84 Stat. 719, Aug. 12, 1970 (Title 39, U.S- Code) (hereinafter "PRA") created the United States Postal Service as "an independent establishment of the executive branch of the Government of the United States," 39 U.S,C. § 201, to provide"a basic and fundamental service...to the people by the Government of the United States." 39 U.S. C. § 101. It is the responsibility of the Postal Service, inter alia, to establish and maintain postal facilities of such character and in such locations that postal patrons throughout the Nation will, consistent with reasonable economies of postal operations, have ready access to essential postal services. 39 U.S.C. § 403(b)(3)_ In planning and building new postal facilities the Postal Service must emphasize the need for facilities and equipment designed to create desirable working conditions for its officers and employees, a maximum degree of convenience for efficient postal services, proper access to existing and future air and surface transportation facilities and control of costs to the Postal Service. 39 U.S.C. §101(g). In order to enable the Postal Service to fulfill the foregoing responsibilities, the Postal Service is empowered by the PRA to acquire, in any lawful manner, such personal or real property it deems necessary or convenient in the transaction of its business; to hold, maintain, sell, lease, or otherwise dispose of such property or any interest therein; to provide services in connection therewith and charges therefore, 39 U.S.C. § 401(5); and to construct, operate, lease and maintain buildings, facilities, equipment, and other improvements on any property owned or controlled by it 39 U.S.C. §401(6). In addition, the Postal Service is specifically empowered to determine the need for post offices, and to provide such offices as it determines are needed. 39 U.S.C. § 404(a)(3). In sum, Congress has empowered the Postal Service to determine the_need for its facilities, where to site its facilities, and whether to lease or own such facilities. "Absent express Congressional consent, where the legal incidence of state or local regulations fails upon the Federal Government or its instrumentalities, such is prohibited by the Supremacy Clause." United States v. Town_of Windsor, 496 F. Supp. 581, 588'(l0: CT 1980), citing.United. States v. Tax Commissioner of Mississi i, 421 U.S. 599: 96 S. Ct. 1872, 44 L. Ed. 2d. 404 (1975);'United States v. County of Allegheny, 322 U.S. 174, 64 S. Ct, 908, 88 L. Ed. 1209 (1944); Maricopaa Coun!y v. Valley Bank; 318 U.S. 357, 63 S. Ct,. 587, 87 L. Ed. 334 (1943); Hancock v. Train, 426 U.S. 1167, 96 S. Ct, 2006, 48 L., Ed. 2d 555 (1976), Mayo v. United States, 319 U.S. 441, 63 S. Ct. 1137. 87 L. Ed. 1504 (1943). "No case law derogates from the conclusion that absent an express Congressional mandate, there is immunity from regulation when the terms of such regulation requires its imposition on the Government, its instrumentalities or its property, as a matter of 07/13/2000 IS:01 8602857397 WINDSOR LAW LISPS PAGt 03 law." Windsor, 496 F. Supp at 589. in matters involving the selection of sites for post offices,'the decision whether to lease or own, and the construction of post offices, leased or owned, there has been no such "clear Congressional mandate" waiving immunity from state or local regulations. See, e. Than_etoronratjon v. the Board of Adjustment of the Township of Princeton, 249 A.2d 31, aff d 260 A. 2d (N.J, App, Div. 1969) ("The United States Government, whether as owner or-lessee, is immune from local zoning ordinances."); Tow►tshof Middletown v, N/E Regional Office, united States Postal Service; 601 F, Supp. 125 (D. N.J. 19855); Stewart v. United States Postal Service, 508 F. Supp. 112 (N.D. Ca'. 1980); Crivello v Board of Adjustment of the Borough of'Nliddlesex, 183 F. Supp. 826 (D. N.J. 1960); Breeze v. Town of Bethlehem, 151 Misc. 2d 230. 573 N.Y-S- 2d 122 (Sup Ct, NY 1991). ("The court finds that plaintiff s project to construct a building on privately owned land, for use as a post office, pursuant to a lease agreement with the United States Postal Service, is immune from state and local zoning and land regulations."); Durkin v. Board of Appeals of Falmouth, 21 Mass. App. 450; 438 WE. 2d 6 (App. Ct.,Mass. 1986) (where court recognized that a use of property as a post office under a lease is immune from application of local land use regulations); United States Postal Service v. Town of Greenwich, Connecticut, 901 F.Supp. 500 (D. Ct. 1995) (the Town may not impose the state building code or the building permit fee schedule on the Postal Service); But see iVion�tc omen v. Town Sherburne, 514 A.2d 702 (Vt. 1986) (where court assumed, without bolding, that Postal Service was immune from local regulation, but on the facts before it, found "legal incidence" of local regulation fell on private citizen). The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution Article VI, Clause 2, was cited in the early case of McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316 (1819) as the basis for striking down state attempts to tax instrumentalities of the United States. A century late, it was applied by the Supreme Court to prevent a state from levying . fines or otherwise interfering where a driver of a U.S. Mail Truck, in the performance of his official duties;operated the truck without having obtained a.license from the state. Johnson v. lylardland, 254 U.S. 51 (1920). In Arizona v_ California, 283 U.S. 423, 75 L. Ed. 1154 (1930), the Court he'd that the Secretary of the Interior was under no obligation to submit plans and specifications for the Boulder Dam project to the State Engineer for approval. Where, as in the case of local zoning and land use regulations; the legal` incidence of such regulations falls on the federal government or its instrumentalities, f such is prohibited by the Supremacy Clause. United States v. Town of Windsor, 496 F. Supp. 581 (D. Ct. 1980), Absent congressional consent, direct state regulation of an activity of the federal government is barred by the Supremacy Clause, United States v. Town of Windsor Connecticut, 765 F. 2d 16 (2nd Cir. 07/13i2000 26:01 8602857397 WINDSOR LAW USPS PAGE 04 I In local zoning and lane: use regulation matters, as in Town of Windsor, lipid., the impact of the local regulation would fall directly on the Postal Service, since the Postal Service has made the determination to site the facility as well as lease it. To allow the Town to enforce its zoning regulations in a manner to deny permission to build a leased postal facility on the site selected by the Postal Service is essentially equivalent to allowing the Town to enforce the provisions directly against the Government. The United States Constitution precludes such enforcement. Accordingly, Postal Service facilities, either leased or owned, are not subject to local zoning and lard use regulations_ if you wish to discuss this matter further, or should you have any questions, or if.I can be of further assistance on this matter, please call me at (860) 285-7094. Very truly yours, Margaret E: Harper Attorney it cc; Kathleen Walker Windsor Facilities Service Office r °F 1HE . .�°� The Town of Barnstable RUMSTAar e, 9� M& �0�' Department of Health Safety and Environmental Services A,F1 Building Division 367 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Ralph Crossen Fax: 508-790-6230 Building Commissioner June 14,2000 McLean Construction: A building permit will be issued for the Cotuit Post Office upon receipt of confirmation that the utilities have been shut off. Since ely, Ralph M.Crossen Building Commissioner' l_ �_ r--�_.�__� 1 z i a r 1� .. .._ -.a. .—-- -'-'J MEMORANDUM To: Ralph Crossen, Building Commissioner From: Chief Paul Frazier Subject:Plans for Proposed `Cotu�t Post Office Construction, 45_S_chool_St.y— Date: June 6, 2000 I have reviewed the plans for the Cotuit Post Office ("Permit Set, 5/1/2000, Sutphin Associates, Inc. ) and discussed same with the contractor. The plans submitted represent what I understand is a "federal" specification, that is, they contain systems over and above what might be required by local code. A stamped set of plans for the fire suppression/alarm systems is forthcoming. The plans I have are not stamped by the appropriate engineer but a set is in process and will be forwarded. After reviewing the plans,. they appear to meet or exceed code. I have suggested installing a heat detector in the loading dock area. A smoke in the main sorting area could be deleted to effect a "no cost" solution. I will inform you of any additional information I receive; otherwise I expect you will be approached soon with plans and a request for the building permit. 11/09/2000 16:24 508-428-0202 COTJIT FIRE DEPT PAGE 01 w ClOT MEMORANDUM To: Ralph Crossen, Building Commissioner From: Chief Paul Frazier �t Post Office Construction,ction 45 School St. Subject:Plans for Proposed Cotu Date: June b, 2000 I have reviewed the plans for the Cotuit Post Office ("Permit Set, 5/l/2000, Sutphin Associates, Inc.") and discussed same with the contractor. The plans submitted represent what I understand is a "federal" specification, that is, they contain systems over and above what might be required by local code. A stamped set of plans for the fire suppression/alarm systems is forthcoming. The plans I have are not stamped by the appropriate engineer but a set is in process and will be forwarded. After reviewing the plans, they appear to meet or exceed code. I have suggested insta' 1a gould be deleted to effect adi o cost" solution. smoke in the main sorting ae i will inform you of any additional information I receive; otherwise I expect you will be approached soon with plans and a request for the building permit. ti rl'he Town of Barnstable • eex,vsn►eLe, Department of Health Safety and Environmental Services Building Division 367 Main Street, Hyannis MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Ralph Crossen Fax: 508-790-6230 Building Commissioner May 11, 2000 The Cotuit Federated Church 40 School Street PO Box 436 Cotuit, Ma. 02635 Re: SPR 39-2000, Post Office, School Street, Cotuit (11035-014) Proposal: Raze and construct new postal facility To Whom It May Concern; Please be advised that this application was approved at the Site Plan Review hearing on April 27, 2000 with the following conditions: • The applicant shall provide documentation of confirming the assertion of federal - jurisdiction • Appropriate signage shall he provided indicating one way travel lane (just inside the two way entrance) Sincerely, /RRaalp�hosser Building Commissioner ....-J SPR Meeting Notes 04/27/2000 the applicant, Mr. Mason,was expected to appear but is obviously not present to respond. (Mr. Mason did not attend either hearing). Mr. Gatewood reiterated that the line needs to be defined and verified. Health indicated they have no concerns (so long as the plans identifying the wetlands are correct). Planning indicated that a special permit is recorded allowing 3 guest rooms and a subsequent modification was granted allowing for a gift shop use and expansion. The history also includes a use variance. Upon questioning, the applicant explained that the studio shall be reserved for family use. There are no lav facilities only bedroom furnishings. The third level of the house is attic storage and is proposed to remain as such. Rob Gatewood sought confirmation that the studio is not tied into the septic system. The BuildingCommissioner inte 'ected that a variance may be required just for the rJ Y q J studio. The applicant assured the panel that this room is reserved for family members and personal friends as there are no sanitary facilities. Engineering informed the panel that one catch basin is actually on town property. Discussion surrounded the destination of the leeching (which is believed to be directed across the street). At this time, the panel also spoke of easement requirements but did not mandate additional investigation or work. Engineering advised a"right-in only"on Route 6A and an"exit-only"on Maple Street. Proper signage should be provided to direct patrons. Conclusion: Approved with the following conditions: Plan shall be reviewed and approved by Conservation. Proper traffic signage shall be provided. Catch basins shall be reviewed and approved by Engineering. This application referred to the Zoning Board of Appeals. SPR 39-2000 Cotuit Post Office, School Street, Cotuit, (R035-014) Dan Ojala presented a brief proposal on behalf of the US Post Office (proposed long term tenant) and the Cotuit Federated Church,property owner. This application had been. continued from 3/23/2000 and remanded for a revised plan. On this date, Mr. Ojala identified the improvements in green space, the elimination of two parking stalls and the relocation of one parking space to the rear of the site. 5 l '� SPR Meeting Notes 04/27/2000 Health advised that all prior issues appeared to be addressed. Planning also advised that the their issues appear to have been addressed. Conservation requested that silt fencing be included during construction in addition to the other protective measures typically used and indicated by the applicant. Engineering advised adding directional signage (painted arrows for one-way). The Building Commissioner sought confirmation that the federal government asserted jurisdiction regarding this project. The applicant indicated that this was true and a brief history was offered. The panel was informed that there was a public hearing in 1998 regarding this matter. In addition, the applicant advised that there were consultations with Town Councilor members including,Richard Clark about this project. Documentation substantiating federal assertion was required by the Building Commissioner. Subsequent discussion included curbing, handicap ramp, existing crosswalk, and a handicap curb cut. Conservation inquired as to the location of the temporary office during construction. The applicant responded that they intend to install three trailers to use on a yet to be determined site. Currently, they are discussing space in Cotuit by the former Friends Market. The applicant was advised that this proposal would also be subject to Site Plan Review. Conclusion: Approved with the following conditions: Appropriate signage shall be provided indicating one way (inside the two way entrance). The applicant shall provide appropriate documentation confirming their assertion of federal jurisdiction. 6 GO T IT,t MEMORANDUM To: Site Plan Review From: Chief Paul Frazier Subject: SPR 39-2000, Cotuit Post Office Date: March 21 , 2000 We are unable to attend today's meeting but wish to register this document with the Site Plan Review Committee. We have reviewed the site plan application and drawings for the above project. This department is familiar with the location. Changes to the building size or it's location on the property do not appear to hinder emergency access to or around the structure as proposed. We will work with the contractor and/or owner's representative with regard to matters concerning the property or structure as related to any applicable fire codes or regulations. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on this project. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William.Francis Galvin,Secretary of the Commonwealth Massachusetts Historical Commission January 7, 2000 Kathleen Walker Real Estate Specialist U.S.Postal Service 6 Urif itin Road North Windsor,CT 06006-0300 RE: Proposed Post Office Construction,45 School Street,Barnstable/Cotuit, MA (MHC#23014) Dear Ms.Walker: Thank you for submitting the additional information received December 10, 1999,concerning the proposed' construction of a new postal facility on the above referenced site. The proposed project site is located within the Cotuit Village Center historic area and adjacent to several properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places. MHC staff determined in a letter dated January 24, 1999,that the proposed project would have no adverse e ff�c*cent Akma1 on the M?4C rv—eivi-*+g and approNing elevation drawings describing the new construction. MHC staff have reviewed the submitted drawings dated 7/1/99 and 8/6/99 describing the proposed new postal facility. M11LC surf are-currently unable to approve these plans as presented. The proposed use of vinyl siding and aluminum window sash is not appropriate for the surrounding historic area. Please develop alternative plans which would involve the use of more traditional materials such as painted wood clapboards and painted wood window sash. MHC staff will evaluate these plans based upon the compatibility of the new construction to the surrounding historic area. r These comments .are provided to assist in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act(36 CFR 800). If yo ve questions,please contact me at this office. Thank you for your cooperation. Sir ere , Paul A.Holtz Historical Architect Massachusetts Historical Commission cc: Barnstable Historical Commission James Gould,Cotuit Historical Commission Bill Moncrief,USPS 220 Morrissey Boulevard,Boston,Massachusetts 02125 (617) 727-8470 Fax:(617) 727-5 128 -TDD: 1-800-392-6090 www.state.Yna.us/se%nhc 5 GH STANDARD LEGEND : :no asymbols willappear on a map _ -._.._.- , GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY 1 — ..... EDGE OF DECIDUOUS TREES t' �r , :i I EDGE OF BRUSH L.._1 -.". ( ( ORCHARD OR NURSERY ___, �IAP 35 1 f - EDGE OF CONIFEROUS TREES M �.... _ AP 35 MAP 35 ,3 ( ._1 - — 2 1_...._.-_..... MARSH AREA 5 #�'33 _ff , Y1 MAP 35 ; _.... 1 ' EDGE OF WATER Q = DIRT ROAD l !_ DRIVEWAY 4---PARKING LOT PAVED ROAD E� - -MAP-35-- — - - DRAINAGE DITCH —_ — — — — PATH/ RAIL 925 PARCEL LINE MAP 35 16 MAP no-c --MAP# 21 E PARCEL NUMBER # 71 l #1860-HOUSE NUMBER ............................... 2 FOOT CONTOUR LINE MAP 35 MAP 35 to Foor coNrouR uNE 100 i 114 - - Elevation based on NGVD29 # 45 ;' # 933 - ;�4.9 SPOT ELEVATION ................:. _ - :...- STONE WALL .... X. FENCE RETAINING WALL i- - -�-- --- RAIL ROAD TRACK ` MAP 35 STONE JETTY SWIMMING POOL # 941 - PORCH/DECK ' r MAF35 MAP 35 j !' ❑ BUILDING STRUCTURE 1 1 t` C a fi Fj, J t... DOCK/PIER # 58 # 46 - MAP 35 HYDRANT " 10 6 VALVE O MANHOLE ` 957 A11-3MAP 35 FLAG POLE „j - L\ O POST O r O W N, O F 6 A R N S T A B L E G E O G R A P H 1 C 1 N F O R M A T I O N S Y S T E M S U N 1 T SIGN ® STORM DRAIN e PRINTED SCALE:IN FEET LNalionol is mop is on enlargement of u **NOTE: The parcel lines are only graphic representations DATA SOURCES: Planimetrics(man-made features)were interpreted from 1995 aerial photographs by The James ��Jt i• scale map and may NOT meet of property boundaries. They are not hue locations,and W.Sewall Company.Topography and vegetation were interpreted from 1989 aerial photographs by GEOD UTILITY POLE TOWER Q 40 $Q ap Aamary Standards at This do not represent odual relationships lo'physical objects Corporation. Planimetrics,topography,and vegetation were mapped to meet National Map Accurncy Standards I INCH=80 FEET* ale. on the map. - at a scale of 1"=100'. Parcel lines were digitized from 2000 Town of Barnstable Assessor's lax mops. 4 O ELECTRIC BOX -- �� p 0 �� rCc�1. �v 3e I e'V'! � � ,� ,� �r �� , \\ // \� _ � 7 \\ � %% \��\ %% _ \\ \\ %� �' '�I I, ..�. FF ll Jn ' �, V f�� l�(J�S�er� `� ��vat S ct:cc e 55pY� b=�<<�� r t 0 1. �,:•�� . . � 5t'S-„ 1�US�.�h 1-Sii i�J,1u1 WT=Inc. - ARCKnFZM ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS f POST %Ta Box IM 164 1AsKNCTON STREET NORWELL. MA 02061 1 PHONEE 781 M-(M3 FA)L• �781 878-8920 fA/E PROJECT NO.: 96077.00 Mvp PROPOSED a t � 1 1 1 r- I I n �� .• � � / � • I Yi $ec ` �/ ^= v CA 24 fn 32 az 1 2e 171 1 1 1 23 1 1 Post-it"brand fax transmittal memo 7671 M of page: ► To From Co. Co. Dept. Phono R fax B Fax A CRAPHIC SCALE - � I NEW BU LDIN-G posr oFECT 7/2/01 Robin C Giangregorio Cotuit Post Office 45 School Street Cotuit, Ma. Re: Noise emanating from AC units on the westerly side of the facility I have spent a considerable amount of time discussing this problem with Mr. Scales (on. behalf of the Church) and Mr. Cira(the abutter). I have also been out to the site. During my visit, I did not find the noise level to be harsh; in fact I thought it to be quite low for the commercial nature of the units. I do not doubt the validity of Mr. Cira's complaint, considering the way sound travels and the quiet village atmosphere of Cotuit. I simply note that at the time I was there, the units (possibly only one of two) appeared to be running. The noise level was not the loud,boisterous sound I was expecting but rather a monotone, low rumble noise much like static. The interim Building Commissioner, Elbert Uleshoffer approved the relocation of the two units in question. This, he claimed was due primarily for purpose of insuring proper ' functioning. When I raised Mr. Cira's question regarding a possible violation of the special permit I was informed that this decision was based upon the building code and was not a zoning issue. Mr. Ulshoeffer immediately dismissed the issue stating that relocation of the AC units could not be interpreted to be a violation of the special permit, as it does not encroach upon the side yard setbacks. I believe that Planning concurs. I have conversed with Mr. Cira on two or three occasions. I have listened to his concerns and complaints, expressed my sympathy and re-assured him that I will attempt to do something on his behalf. I did, however, explain to Mr. Cira that we could not overturn the decision of the previous Commissioner. With this in mind, I requested written notification from the ZBA citing their interpretation that the re-location of the units is indeed a violation of the special permit. Once, we receive justification, this department will pursue all avenues available to us. In the mean time, I spoke to Mr. Scales (representing the church) about installing a fence (I amended the request to an 8' stockade). Mr. Cira was not very optimistic about this. He wants a particular concrete fence and has since spoken to an acoustical engineer regarding this matter. I explained that we need to start somewhere and the church appears willing to continue its pursuit to mitigate the sound. The theory is that the fence would channel the sound to the rear of the property, which is wooded and may absorb the noise thus abating or otherwise mitigating the sound level exposure on the westerly side. I also explained that once the fence is installed I would request Glenn Harrington(BOH Agent) to return for an impartial assessment of the sound level as he had previously I visited Mr. Cira's home. If Glenn is not,satisfied, the church will continue to the next level, which may involve installing bafes inside the enclosure, etc. or some other measure until Mr. Harrington deems it to be an acceptable level. Mr. Cira countered that the noise level prior to construction was zero and that is what the goal should be. It should also be pointed out that the AC units are on timers that are set to terminate at 5:30 pm and come on again at 7:30 am. (or,so I am informed). This was specifically done in response to Mr. Cira's complaint that the noise kept his family awake all night. The noise by law, I believe is enforced by the PD but is typically reserved for music and noises not normally associated with standard office/building equipment. I believe the PD referred the issue back to the BOH. Unfortunately, this is a real quagmire. I trust the church is attempting to be a good neighbor. I also recognize their concern about cost. I am unsure of the PO's (federal) contribution to the project. Perhaps if the noise is not abated to the satisfaction of Mr. Cira, the PO may offer some assistance. I begged Mr. Cira's indulgence until the fence is actually installed. I understand his frustration but we really need to focus on the first step before we condemn it as a failure. 7/5/01 Robin C. Giangregorio Cotuit Post Office—Lighting Issue On Tuesday afternoon,July 2,2001 at 4:25 pm I spoke to Mr.Dwight Cody of 7 High Street,an abutter of the Cotuit Post Office. Mr. Cody called to complain about the lighting of the aforementioned facility. When I questioned him regarding the illumination of the parking lot(which is governed by special permit) he explained that his complaint is regarding the interior illumination. Apparently,it is too bright and therefore interferes with his ability to enjoy his property.This,he explained is a violation of the special permit whereas it is ordered that no condition should be detrimental to the neighborhood. He defines excessive lighting as detrimental. He has not come forward sooner because this is his summer home and he is usually down only on weekends. I informed Mr.Cody that interior lighting is not within our jurisdiction in the building department. I . admitted that I was unsure about the ZBA's right to intervene at this late date. I did offer to contact the church and or post office and attempt to mediate a compromise on his behalf. It should also be noted for the record that Mr. Cody is currently renovating his kitchen. Mr. Cira,the abutter who complained about the AC units violating the special permit and depriving him of his right to enjoy his property,had possession of Mr. Cody's house key. It was Mr. Cira who admitted the MM building inspector into the Cody property. This would certainly suggest that the two neighbors are on good terms and would explain the common usage of the phrases such as"violation of special permit"& "detrimental to the neighborhood". On Friday,July 6t`,I called Mr. Scales(representing the church and being record owner of.the PO property). I asked him to intervene on my behalf and reduce the interior illumination. He agreed to pursue this with the postmaster who is expected to return from vacation next Tuesday.At the conclusion of our conversation,Mr. Scales agreed to inform me directly of the anticipated measures they will take as a result of this request. t W.I"k1K I I li•I I)jj to CSl(9 !U w Il'Ek01ED G2 1 ,.PACTED (6'LIM) � /:11 MA nN E.V'S7JNC 91X-'ol X 60ENO ,-aXW.kLX t70O rnsl CURBING �I STo�AN fa2crarF l_ Ayr£rTsn c�urr�a� wo 9a S —t _� 17 r 44 RBING R�gO "02 cuv6K c TD br R=wv ae air . $_L`' �.00 l:/T MAR7f Q151RVC.57K4CX 5s SECTION u"^' a+ - I ';CAIE U o \: LAWN✓ '- b1N. 1 `\ UPC ab 81MM(r-C-,! 1:11 RAMP ;N -qr ARC QFTAKS CAPE(TTP.) e' B' 3 HI ^' .�40.3 T rl� / C P '► // �Qm �' ,.11. ry (T .) �2 PRL'1°GLS�DLR !E cY/RB \ vi/ W 6� i L AM7 12•BUAIM �. f\y Y RGtpT A' Iav (PP.J \` / AR£A ,. Q• '{s 2',9fN-ZOW ROOT IRE£(TY13) I Oct • H-2i 0 60"t / 7 ♦ 1 �'� b i 9• /�'� :p/HSp£CT .j ��.. .6�• ,:•I ; 1 `m/O . C. CMO✓AL R41C£ ',� / °• '<C F`� \ 3' f 000 Gn R£CY//R£D .'f� i q7' q� Ip / o t}X6•L11 _0) -0 i";:gib.`,;?`•j>w/ rOC4,s /J. �, E> O-6OX Apt CyNr r;� ,9. +/.9 WALTER P. RP.PP �' . CAPE COD AW ASWULT 1.12 19 �R O 7.0;4/ � '•cf'r / ,E•.(7i lgyy � - (TypJ l 2' RAW \ q0 h \ J`T• //qe, ` } h E °j 6Wy £EWEA44 AAE7 72�BUF \ / i Jo 10MiN �JOHN B. SULGER EXISTING */�\ x6' LPIT \ --_ � _ TO br REM014D PRo asw G��•{ _-600 CAL H-20 `�� °%°• \ 6X4•LPIr W/4•Si71VE• .` \ '•`\ f s1.q H-20 rtC LL4L3t . /Nv IN-JAdt tod OM vw \ nvv our-JRBt \ \ PR0°05-W \ m ( l 600 CAL H-20 6:Y4'LPIT Wl/4 S1avC �•\ \ H-20 r&C ';j0t WY 0�r �\ \ PRa'QSID l `AREA pPA.N a`X6 5\ \\ �Lud1;L •Wlf?'PA �\ \.y �. 1 \\ \ /NV OUrJ670t (I{I1'BAC�S.AM7 y ,\ \ \\` `'`�•a ?40"• \.// (OCATTC?V wry6•STDCA'ADC S>�f fDfa'W W CA T1 o \ }5 / EXSTING IOIDIA. a IO'DEEP CESSPOOL APPROXIMATE LOCATION EDGE'Or / 1D LL'PwPED DRY YfCG rAnl£11�!\ co /' AHD REMMIED r P� ro�. \ NO rE.• PROPOSED E740570W CONTROL NETANC \ ON ALL SLOPES GREA TER "o NAN 1OX C�0, \''� \ CHARLES L. ALGER OLT �o COORDINATE LOUVER TYPE. SIZE AND LOCATION WITH _ MECHANICAL DESIGN 5 2 A3.1 19'-4. 75'-b• -U 4'-0' 35'-4' 20-4' 6'-a r---------- I b A3.1 °° 4 --- FULL b l . OR LOUVER a ERRVIICE AAq I b FOR BOr- o ME AL N l0a ROOM \SJ* N f l Z. SPEC -- Aat A11 109 � LINE 6'-1 / `T' t 1 7 1 P SCREEN O I I0-5 1 1c LOBBY — —— —_ THE WALL q •i Z, lOt I b n t, ——————— tASNTO ET 1 3._4 I 5•-0- _7 1 Y '-0't'-3 1 Y L — A6 MOP SINK 108 . )ECESSED 6 x 8 ' MOP/BROOM q 16 i 1 1 6 y1 5 A4.4 b I HYDRAULIC � FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PANEL 4 ' _© '• Aa1 2 I SCISSORS LIFT ON WALL AROUND SINK AND e I EE DETAILS ON b 6'-3 t/Y MELAMINE ON WALLS AROUND SINK _� a A11 I HT. A7.2 I 19 UP TO 4' AF.F. 4 2 1 0 ' A11 �L�ITFOR. I ROOM CASED OPENING I MAIL 106 FROM FLOOR TO a 1 PLATFORM 2 54 AF.F. I i A4� I 113 A45 11 q EATING UNIT b SEE M1.2 _ I i SELF = SERVICE. r— — A I 1 TLET Q '^ 102 0 OI 1 I I� a A4.4 bD 'EL. -2. E I 11. reCOORDINATE R.O. REOUIREMENTS 3 4. W/ LOCKER MANUFACTURER O o _ � 10 b t 5- 4 10 1/2 A11 0 16'-t 1 4 R.O. 15'-1 1/4' .0. � — J � 4 b I 11 t —.—.—`1-IC.—.\ RENT-A-BOX 2 -9 m 1 WOMQN'S •i .� t 103 1 b ! 1._ _ g•_Tj _ 4'- TOIL T �. ty2 19'-4 — —— — —— — �T— ALUM. WALL CAPS (TYP. OF 2) I 11'-8 6'-0 5'-4 6'-0"I -0 6' D - 116 t7 5'-4 6'-(r 5'-4 6'-0' 8'-U 12 � \ 6'-(f -,0 t 4 2 n � S 8 3/4" 29'-0' 8'-6 1/ 8 3/4 A9] M.1 A9.1 A I m 2 O 1 CONFIRM LOCATION OF THE PARTITION WITH ALT. NUMBER OF BOX SECTIONS ®Op pL /�t t REG'JLAFt EXIT DOQR W/ CANOPY 1._� 0 4' B. 16 El 12, x L vom ANO FUJES_TO W.LOCA1 o ON JHE.89X SIDE OF THE BULDPI - ALI > ATTIC FAN W/ 7 SECURITY BARS gflNQ ES ) . . A Aflt �Lj SNIR VENT 6' DIA FLUE J v — — TRUSS BRG. L=- WALL MTD LIGHT FIXTURE (TYP.) --- ! ELI1'-5 I/7 Or GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT CLAPBOARD, TYP• _TOP OF SLAB L EL 0'-0" — — — EL 5-2 �------- ----- ------------------------------ - -' ------ -------- ----- ---------- -------- -L______-_-J _____________________________________._ _ __________________________ ______________________ ______________ _____W000 CLAPBOARD, TYP. WALL HYDRANT W/ LOCK SIDE ELEVATION DSCALE: s 0 q g 16' A3.1 1 2 A41 A11 AA-2 A4 2 7 RIDGE A43 All SHINGLES (TYP.) 5 - — — — EL 19'-Z" TASK UGHT GUTTER AND DS. GUTTER AND DS. — TRUSS BRG —- -- 5.. —_ _ EL. 10'- iT Cl T.O-- �- EL. 8-I J.O. I—J B.O. CD M EL❑ n 2 0 _ � 2 - 9 EL 2-0 - —- _ t . TOP Of SLAB - = EL 0'-0 RN1 SEE DET: 3/C2.2 DETAI ------- ---- 1 J10-AI- PUSH PULL ENTRY DOOR GRAPHICS L__i _-� --------------------------'------ w HYDRANT W/ LOCK - ------------- ----w)(P. -- -`----�-----'------------------ W0. CIAPBOPRD, TYP. .,iEAD DOOR = - - --------------------- RN3 SEE DET: 4/C2-2 v610N UTES `---1WD. CUPBOPRD, TYP. DOWNSPOUT r/ � 1 SIDE ELEVATION 4 SCALE: 1/9' �a I S,t T{fl r N,l lr - '`t7,��r��hf F' • • • ITUvis v Y-. 1 ti F n,tt'1'Y: .<� S Slf'ilt off;, :: � _ —__ _ —! ��rT.�1 1• / fE >r1,_f. I, a .n r� ,pt j �. • Y�'f 1 xhliiE � I { �a s ? I t �a f 1,� aiSc Lp YsTty�t! t 1{I�'I} tF�A.�N;n ira�I jull��. ` uaL• k ;5>41�a � � 11 1 '�� tYY yVl(fy� a �Ltit'S}. � 1 �1�� •� S b�IY 'ttkallt li{i fief�+V =��C �i � � •I•I +i p sk Molv.,17 tX 1 x; r °•�lill�i'llll��°��}!'°1��D��U��lt�!��1��{;I��I��,' RML rl M Prh{+>'NI r i,a R�J(W + e• s3°•�ii °��ti , ag u 7 �:.., §fir; �-T� �� I1'1 • t. V r '}}C d + i� jf 1 • + ' r y r} I , , i k •..3.:1»tS/s4e949/131�is:ss/:/aLsh/if�di/:S/Pie��iw�,u.is9S::LSs:/at s/i:s:u�'/i:s/aAs:e9S a.S. 1 1, � , Malta , °t.,a tt t � h •. I,fr U 1,a�Nr yk{jPeC'� �.�.-�'�•� --— ——� 1 1 t d r r + j; "try • BAflBSTAEL$ o 9�p 639. �MAYA� i TOWN OF BARNSTABLE PETITION FOR VARIANCE SPECIAL PERMIT UNDER THE ZONING BY-LAW To the Board of Appeals, Hyannis, Mass. Date ........... ..Map 9, 195g 195............ _............. ........................... The undersigned petitions the Board of Appeals to vary, in the manner and for the reasons hereinafter set forth, the application of the provisions of the zoning by-law to the following described premises. Applicant: ...........�cotuit Federated,Church _.........._ .......................... Full .................._................................. Name) (Winter Address) Owner: ..........................!��............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ (Full Name) (Winter Address) Tenant (if any) . ........................................................................I................................... ............................................................. Full Name) (Winter Address) 1. Location of Premises .............School St•(oPposite High St•)� Cotuit ............................................................................. ................. .............................. ........................................ (Name of Street). What section of Town 2. Dimensions of lot ............17. ! �� Area 36 ? (Front$ge> t................... Depth) (Square Feet) 3. Zoning district in which premises are located...._...... ..2............. ........................................................................................ 4. How long has owner had title to the above premises! April 1J�, 1958 . ........................................................................................................................ 5. How many buildings are now on the lot? Old.elementw school house which is to be ... . .......... 6. (live size of existing buildings r®move before P.O. is built. r9t5� .._.................._........_.............................................:......................................................................................................... Proposed buildings .... A .t... f , fit. ��T!....1.311.......................... .......AbBdOnecl...ee11o01„house _..... ..................... .......................... 7. State present use of premises 8. State proposed use of premises ......:....N .Post .Office Building . -.......................................... . .. New ...................... 9. (live extent of proposed construction or alterations• Raze old school building. .....................................�EBest near..P..ost.office(36!...x..3i.'..) .......Prepare..parking area...for...use .................. ......_..........................._...°f..Eost offiae� .church, .and public..(see.attached sketch) 10. Number of living units for which building is to be arranged None 11. Have you submitted plans for above to the Building Inspector? ......Y .............1.............................................................. 12. Has he.refused a permit? ............................................................... .............................................. N ................................ ........ .................................. 13. What section of zoning by-law do you ask to be varied? ........0.1 — also non—conforming ....._........................................................................................ use section. ................_...................................................._......................................-................................................_.......................... ..._.................................................................................... 14. State reasons for variance or special permit: 1he Preannt W.At,,Off Ce„is in a buildin which is to be torn down by the Town of Barnstable action of g { 19�8 Town meeting). „The Town..deeded .the .abandoned_.school �o�iert to the Federated Church... !.. ._......._........................_............................... e c.......$.......t '1958 Town meeting. The post office department has approved the location _............_... .......... �............... ............................................................................................................................................... of the old school property for the erection of a new post office for the ..._.................................................................................._................................................ .............. ................................................................................. ..... lage of Co tui t. The citizens of Co tui t are raising $13,000 to build the ............................._...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Post office. A large parking area.will serve the post offices church, and �. . .Public. _ .Cotnit, citizens feel .that this old.school .... ... ....... is suitabl.._................................_............................._..................... ..property....... ......................................®........ .for limitedur�osea .°P .aubltc _nature. Respectfully submitted:. Co ed ated Ch Or Trustees (Signature) :.. . .......................... hairman) ....... ..... Petition received by ................................................................................ t Cotuit, Mass. (Address) . .............................................................................................................. Hearing date set,for ............................................................ 195............ * Piling fee of $7.50 required with this petition. * This form may also be used for Appeals. (Over) I PEERLESS INSURANCE Peerless Insurance Company Member Liberty Mutual Group a ❑ The Netherlands Insurance Company Bond No. 018-999109 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That We, McLEAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC 288 SOUTH RIVER ROAD, BEDFORD, NH 03110 as Principal, and PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY a New Hampshire Corporation, and having its principal office in the City of Keene, New Hampshire, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, MA, 367 MAINSST. . H NNIs.'hereinafter caned the OBLIGEE) in the penal sum of - ONE THOUSAND AND NO/1OOTHS - DOLLARS ($ 1,000.00 ) lawful money of the United States of America to be paid to said Obligee, for which payment well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors,_ administrators, successors and assigns,jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Signed with our hands and sealed with our seals this 1ST day of 'JUNE 2000 WHEREAS, a LICENSE or PERMIT has been granted by the Obligee to the above bounden Principal authorizing said Principal to FOR USE AND/OR OPENING SCHOOLSSTREET, COTUIT, MA Now, therefore, the Condition of this Obligation is such, that if the said Principal shall faithfully observe the provisions of the Laws, Ordinances, and Resolutions, governing the issuances of this License or Permit, then this Obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Liability under this bond shall terminate as.of the 1ST day of JUKE, 2001 , as to any acts subsequent thereto, unless said bond is continued in force from year to year by the issuance of a continuation certificate signed by the Surety. The Surety may cancel this bond at any time by filing with the Obligee thirty (30) days written notice of its desire to be relieved of liability. The Surety shall not be discharged from any liability already accrued under this bond, or which shall accrue hereunder before the expiration of the thirty day period. MILE C STRUCTION COMPANY, INC. BY: (Principal) JAMES J. MCLEAN, PRESIDENT PEE SS IN URANCE COMPANY (Surety) CL J"t�L B Attorney-in-Fact E. A. MORRISSETTE 346-110(07/99) EERLESS IN SURANCE COMPA y ITHE NETHERLANDS INSURANCE CCIVfP` ' n " 62 MAPLE AVENUE KEENE,NEW HAMPSHIRE, 03431 -:... POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Peerless Insurance Company and/or The Netherlands Insurance Company,each being a New Hampshire Corporation having its principal office in the City of Keene,County of Cheshire,State of New Hampshire do/does hereby make,constitute and appoint: ****H. W. Adams; E. A. Morrissette; James Harrison; D. J. McLaughlin; R. E. Dineen**** of Manchester in the State of New Hampshire their/its true and lawful attorney(s)-in-fact,with full power and authority hereby conferred in their/its name,place and stead,to sign,execute,acknowledge and deliver in their/its behalf,and as their/its act and deed,without power of redelegation,as follows: bonds, undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and all other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, unlimited as to Dollar Amount: and to bind the Company(ies)making this appointment thereby as fully and to the same extent as i b d r de ak g was signed by the duly authorized officers of the Company(ies),and all the acts of said attorney(s),pursuant to the authori ei gi e eh e of d and confirmed. AUTHORITY FOR MAKING APPOINT T S- -F Section 7 of Article 3 of Bylaws of Peerless Insurance Company,as amended M 0 7, tat s: `T n r ce President(s)and Vice Presidents(s)of the Company's Bond Profit Center may appoint and remove Attorneys-in-F d si the d vo appropriate such duties,powers and authority as may be advantageous to the Company including the execution an s id o o s, ert recognizances,contracts of indemnity,and all other writings obligatory in the nature thereof and other documents on beh o th om n w wer to redelegate such authority." Section 9 of Article 5 of Bylaws of The Netherland ur e o p y,as e de ay 30, 1997 and June 16, 1997,states: "The Senior Vice President(s) and Vice President(s)of the Company's Bond o Conem y app 'nt d re Attorneys-in-Fact, an assign to them and revoke as appropriate such duties, powers and authority as may*be adv eo to a Wmp inc ' g the execution and atte tat n of bonds, undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity,and all other writin bli to en u th a and other documents on beh o mpany with power to redelegate such authority." E OF FACSIMILE SI S Use of facsimile signatur b P Hess s e o any is made pursuant to le, solvtft o the ar kof Directors of Peerless Insurance Company,dated April 28,1988. Use of facsi it sig es etherlands Insurance p is adirs ant to s tion of the Board of Directors of The Netherlands Insurance Company,dated ri 1 88. Y N A P ENT The company making this appointment is identified by an` bo o os•e i n in the space provided below. It is the intent of Peerless Insurance Company and The Netherlands Insurance Company to use t is stru t the a intment of Attomey(s)-in-Fact for either Company designated,or for both Companies, if so indicated. In Witness Whereof X PEERLESS INSURANCE CO: AN X THE NETHERLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY has/have caused these presents to be signed by its ice President,and its Corporate Seal to be hereto affixed by its Assistant Secretary,this 2nd day of February 2000 PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY THE NETHERLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY By: / o By: ,. Vice President Vice President19781/ Attest: Attest: Assistant Secretary Q Assistant Secretary STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE COUNTY OF CHESHIRE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2nd day of February 2000 by Matthew Klimezak,Vice President of the Bond Profit Center of Peerless Insurance Company and of The Netherlands Insurance Company and Jane F. Taylor, Assistant Secretary of Peerless Insurance Company and The Netherlands Insurance Company,New Hampshire Corporations,on behalf of the corporations. M,commi..bn-P- k i eOUBI.tG f Notary PublicN,M.s�PW Minch I e,Z003 I,.lane F.Taylor,Assistant Secretary of Peerless Insurance Company and The Netherlands Insurance Compan do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is atrue and correct copy of Power of Attorney executed by the Company(ies�designated above which In still in force and effect. In wit whereof, l hav@ h unto set my hand and fed t e Seal(s) of the Company(ies),at Keene,New Hampshire,this 1 '1' day of ANECO s (f 1978 1901a (?"Jane F,' Cavlor Assistant Secretary .... „ - • .• • • . • �.j317A.z._ -.:r:e a.::. ...red,. >._....u...... -,Nn_O� A ~' :... lw 00 i 05/22/2000 11:22 508-362-7867 CLARK ENG PRODUCTS 1 PAGE 03 The Commonwealth of Mdssach usWs Department of Indasttzal Accidents 600 Washington Sired Briton,Maser OZlll Workers' Con ensation Insormce AMdavit 11 MCLEAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY I lo2cmdon• 288 SOUTH RIVER ROAD BEDFORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03110 (603) 669-0040 citv -- I am a homeow=padbrmia8 all wolc myself. ` ❑ I am a sole actor and haw ao ana tvorlan in a& tea=for my empl wor4c g oa th i ob. �vaiions 1 WmP ::�. s:•l:y'at�an :).>Y..i �y� �. p(�Vv1�1��iiw� Ny: .: •":,<.r„ej'=:;ieQUM <" Y✓?oi>>R•'.•iS :?'?.:.•.� `..,...�.,.::...< ti r ^. ..... ..... „ ..<.(.y r .'fin�":,y�" !<Y.,< uM1��•»•>; Sa:'�f::�.�::.e. :C��:•: ":2;A�..<<.. !` :?7�!re.,iyT:.•6i: ie};a)•.^"'>!va.'�'no: y av �s '.`?g�a•.;�6?4.x..s.\:. •.:e�; "rr, s'i:: .a. � i :a.Y"..:.::<%::'::i':...h!iM:.i>. :C,el'.>�'?�:. -...Se": •.L �%-:•may<,..<•dte ^. 11i. fa,,{� w%. ..^C: .•l:b.': :ui':.:::1� :?;�>eR•1<('.i ^> � �' `: sc?a;•'Gp}! - nllgi ka <.i.:.•i ,Y,u1:'tGi::�.K%P,P�f:' �/Y� <j<%S'� .•aRNF ie'u� ...:...:.:, .:::...:..;>: ..:.�.:•;::;ice _ ?Q I am a sok propriatar,gmery for,or homeowner(ck*onto and haw bnvd tba aoaaactm lister below who hBVe the foll .v �8 'r p� ....::. ... .......: ... :< <�:. .>�<0��:e°aat {p .� ••a:«. :. .. ,'k.:.;.>.��::'<'r.., <ss:Y. ga:;.:;r,!:. �i9�i ...e.,, .<....•....>l.+!:'a?.+.»7< .c' } >'T€,°S.».:,:JD.e:•v ns e: > <:y'•: �>i-' r.:'.4ive<: .ii: ':'y^;j?:"°Qs+e%i�> :si+>�..r �i fi:l! ':k•• f.. •�b o� 1 tdNnft BONN r� Ifo •.<•.::•.<:'.^;•J".:.i:i'" .x}fir:' ! prance ca: �. ... . .:... „..,<..:.:.; �(� _<;C>:!; ::yYi;:'"�-7�>- <.iW<ew��/ �'v�sj9::� Yip:3� x••1.:;y�'>�°.y cum s Repo— :•<•r..e,. !-dry:<' <:� a,.: i:'<'; 1{ e r ,�. .,r �:Ye.>. $;•at. :z R�.r. �G• i•�t,� '.,e:.. •:ate =a:>9sir.�si� .. is'11— :Ate...'>'/^'�,.. h`. .tii3!'r-':' ,D><.., ,5.::.� •'i f.'S,Dt:• or. rS'.. >c LVIM IN-Now a'>•i:'r"••'<:—,r..:o:u ..„,>e�'.:.' >ein:<;::...y::-' '^,i`':;�a<"`' ''T� a�;.�.`:2'6b'� °z� d;ee:�'...L"b••�`iS°'it> i x?Y�>,! j^.; wx :ei:r.y >Fs „ ,�' .'r < cr :••:7t:iy: .> Q ! < weoo.Mad to ma�! of ihd peouYiae da t>m np to f1J00.00 and/or Faihwv to meewae eon mqe m ro4ded alder Seetlaa 21A orM(N.1SZ �, drat a oat years'btnptisonmew n v a se dws pmdlles to tho fern of s Slop WORK OIIDBR ad a dw of$10a.00 a day agobut I tatiastsmS espy of thk otatem m ray be�*weeda�to the Oloa Y[IavAdptloo o(tha DIA lbr eorer>•Se�ari0rallon I do herby cesfif�under the poba msd penahfss of Fw jnry thot the infopmddon provided aboae it&a-aid eo ral 7 - ' 14 MAY 22 , 2000 _ Prkt name ICOLE M. MAZALE SKI. peril (603) 669-0040 ofSdal we only do not write m tLb um to be mphtted by d!y er tows emdd P N 02a8ding Deparmumt dtt or town- ❑ucesmiop Boa" Q checkf(rmmediale eesponse to eeldred ❑Nmd&me a rtim Os..uh Dopartmeat . contact petao>n P Nt — Other (/eYYsl 0/91 PIA) CNo. 2I l " :3 Fee G OMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Entered in computer: Yes HEALTH DIVISION - TOWN OF BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS Tipplication for -Migool *p$tem Construction Permit Application for a Permit to Construct( )Repair( )Upgrade( )Abandon( ) ❑Complete System ❑Individual Components Location Address or Lot No. �5;s' 5e.400/ ST Cori Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. - csV _ O - 7 Z i- 614-3 O3� D/ C�f✓r�,L� . Assessor's Map/Parcel y i Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. Designer's Name,Address and Tel'.No. Mars ,5VP-- 3 e 2- OL21w11 6Wr 1�; fJ. Type of Building: Dwelling No.of Bedrooms Lot Size YZ 6C?sq. ft. Garbage Grinder( ) Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow 3 6 6 gallons per day. Calculated daily flow gallons. Plan Date Number of sheets Revision Date o0 Title Size of Septic Tank Type of S.A.S. Description of Soil fool e 522r74K .f- eoitrc SAS a� Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) Date last inspected: Agreement: The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the Environmental Code and not to place the system in operation until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has been issued b this Board of alth. Signed Date—6/� 0 Application Approved by Date t4 �`��' j Application Disapproved for the following reasons Permit No. a- Date IssuedC THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS -(Certificate of (Compliance THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the On-site Sewage Disposal System Constructed ( ) Repaired ( ) Upgraded ( ) Abandoned( )by 62 e-lyJaW,-' e,., YDV. Bok 7 y/r�.,rshh / ;11!r at S o ^ has been constructed in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 and the for Disposal System Construction P dated Installer .�a.�ra�f� . � r�i-c,.,,��-, Designer y01 o;,.�, The issuance of this permit shall not be construed as a guarantee that the system will function as designed. Date Inspector ---�—t ----�----------------------------/--t— No. file 4�L��✓"��`' Fee THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION - BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS ligogaf *pgtem Con!6trUction Permit Permission is hereby granted to Construct )P J,epair( )Upgra )Ab don System located at �'� fr�'C- ?< e and as described in the above Application for Disposal System Construction Permit.The applicant recognizes his/her duty to comply with Title 5 and the following local provisions or special conditions. Provided: Construction must be completed within three years of the date of this permit. d Date: Approved by No. Y Lt d " Fee OMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Entered in computer: Yes HEALTH DIVISION -TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS ZIpprication for Migogai bpgtem (tongtruction i3ermit Application for a Permit to Construct.( )Repair( )Upgrade( )Abandon( ) O Complete System O Individual Components Location Address or Lot No. f r.Seheo/ V.7— �of�i owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. Tfjs �af+•i rTq/ Assessor's MapTarcel 0 3S O Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No. �Mors� .sUp-- ,�s a.. faryi Type of Building: 2 Dwelling No.of Bedrooms Lot Size T6C sq.ft. Garbage Grinder( ) Other TI pe of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow 3 6 6 gallons per day. Calculated daily flow al7a gallons. Plan Date Number of sheets / Revision Date /ao Title y�i>�" s�'oa Size of Septic Tank Type of S.A.S. �.2p Description of Soil Looakm.. -522.7000' -F brr gO Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) N�iq Date last inspected: Agreement: The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the Environmental Code and not to place the system in operation until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has been issued b this Board of alth. Signed Date / o 19 Application Approved by Date Application Disapproved for the following reasons Permit No. s a- c� Date Issued �! -------------=------------------------- THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS Certificate of (Compliance THIS IS TO CERTIFY,that the On-site Sewage Disposal System Constructed( )Repaired ( ) Upgraded ( ) Abandoned( )by A2 r4pJr*Sr2' ranr6--rhd.1 .?-i,r P.O " M%lr oA4W at has been construct d in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 and the for Disposal System Construction P O " dated 25rrZc�, Installer .Sa.ylno/4 / lc�s�s�rry, Designer twain.T k.A*ftm.d% The issuance of this permit shall not be construed as a guarantee that the system will function as designed. Date Inspector ---------------------------------------- No.. zezier"'.71"' ( Fee THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION - BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS ligpogal Opgtem Congtruction Permit Permission is hereby granted to CWtruct ) pair( )Upgra )Ab don 5_-.I,. c System located at • G'� fry L- Cc��l Ll! and as described in the above Application for Disposal System Construction Permit.The applicant recognizes his/her duty to comply with Title 5 and the following local provisions or special conditions. Provided:Construction must be completed within three years of the date of this permit'. Date: Approved by _ TOWN OF BARNSTABLE CATE OF OCCUPANCY PARCEL ID 035 014 GEOBASE ID 2049 ADDRESS 45 SCHOOL STREET PHONE COTUIT ZIP - I LOT BLOCK LOT SIZE DBA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CT PERMIT 53443 DESCRIPTION COMPLY W/ZBA#2000-86/SP#39-2000 W/I 60 DAYS I!i PERMIT TYPE BCOO TITLE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTORS: Department of Health, Safety ARCHITECTS: and Environmental Services TOTAL FEES: BOND INE .00 CONSTRUCTION COSTS $.00. d Qi► 756 CERTIFICATE OF _OCCUPANCY 1. PRIVATE P ?E�' * BARNSTABLE. MASS. I 1639. A� ED MAl BUILDING D VISION - _� a DATE ISSUED 05/18/2001 EXPIRATION DATE BY I ------- ------- 1 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE . < , BUILDING PERMIT PARCEL ID 035 014 GEOBASE- I.}3- 2049 ADDRESS.. 45 SCHOOL STREET PHONE COTUIT ZIP - LOT BLOCK LOT SIZE DBA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CT PERMIT 50053 DESCRIPTION COMPLY W/ Z_B.A.# 2000-86 SITE PLAN 1$39-2000 PERMIT TYPE BUILDC TITLE COMMERCIAL BUILDING E CONTRACTORS: MCLEAN CONSTRUCTION Department of Health, Safety ARCHITECTS: and Environmental Services TOTAL FEES: $3,714.29 9 BOND $.00INE CONSTRUCTION COSTS $608,900.00 � N' Qi► p 324 PROF, BANKS, OFFICE BLDG 3 PUBLIC PRT, * BARNSTABLE, • MASS. 1639. BUILDING D wIs DATES ISSUED 11/17/2O00 EXPIRATION DATE 'w . ..W TOWN " O� BUILDING PERMIT 4 PARCEL ID 035 014 GEOBASE ID 1` 2049 ADDRESS- - 45 SCHOOL STREET PHONE COTUIT ZIP LOT BLOCK LOT SIZE DBA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CT PERMIT 49960 DESCRIPTIW DEMO OLD COTUIT POST OFFICE. PERMIT TYPE BDEMO TITLE "DEMOLITION PERMIT CONTRACTORS: MCLEAN CONSTRUCTION . Department of Health, Safety ARCHITECTS: and Environmental Services TOTAL FEES: BOND $.00 OxINE CONSTRUCTION COSTS $.00 4p�' 649 ALL OTHER BLDG DEMOLITION 3 PUBLIC PR.rli'R'"` ; * ■ARNSTABLE, # MASS. 1639. FD M1'I► BUILDIN - IVI 'ION f BY ,DATE ISSUED 11/14/2000 EXPIRATION DATE W T07'N .. S TABLE . PARCEL: ID- 035 014 C•E'OBASE ' 2049. ADDRESS - . 45, SCHOOL STREET_- HONE CCTUI ' ZIP LOT _ BLOCK. : LOT:: SIZE � DESEWPMEN rDMA C PERM-IT 49960 DESCRIPTION DEMO OLD COTUIT POST OFFICE. PERMIT TYPE BDEFtO TI.TLE DEMOLITION PERMIT CONTRAC,'TORS o IMCL EAN CONST U'CTION Department of Health, Safety ARCHITECTS: . and Environmental Services TOTAL. F'41 ES. BOND $,Oq tNE CONSTRUC`. ION COSTS $,.00 6.49 . - ; ALL OT;iER 3LDC DEMOT-,ITIO 3: . PUBLIC -PRI 4 R - MAS& BUILDIN IVI ION BY DATE ISSU10 -Ii/14/2000 EXPIRA'TIOWDAT& Y I THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET,ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF, EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY.EW CROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION.•STREET OR I ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAYBE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS I PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE'SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF FOUR CALL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND WHERE APPLICABLE, SEPARATE 1.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS THIS CARD KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR 2. PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS HAS BEEN MADE.WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCU ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND MECH- (READY TO LATH). PANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALL NOT BE ANICAL INSTALLATIONS. 3.INSULATION.. OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE., 4.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS . I VA 2 A I ' I 3 11rni1l 1HEATING INSPECTION APPROVALS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2 OTHER: SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED. UNTIL PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CON- INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS . THE INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE STRUCTION WORK.IS'NOT STARTED WITHIWSIX CARD CAN BE ARRANGED FOR.BY VARIOUS STAGES OF. CONSTRUC- MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS'ISSUED AS TELEPHONE OR WRITTEN NOTIFICA- TION. NOTED ABOVE. TION. , BUILDING 'I PERMIT .. " `'OWN OF'%13k .NSTABLF ~BUILDWG PERMIT "PARCEL gID 035 014 GI:OBAA�ID .: 204�� A117�Sa 48 "CHOJL STREET � PHONE I COTUTT ZIP j 'LOT � BLOCK LOT Sd.ZE DBA DEVEWPM.E;NT DISTRICT C`:r' PERMIT 50063 DESCRIPTION COMPLY W1 Z.E-A.# 2000-86 SITE PLAN 30--20001 PERMIT .17PE BUIL DC TITLE COWNIERCIAL BUILDING I I CONTRACTORS:. MCL,EAN CONSTRUCTION Department of Health, Safety ARCHITECTS: and Environmental Services i _ I TOTAL FEES: $3,714.Z9 - I ZNE BOND $.00 ptr CONSTRUCTION COSTS . $608,900.0.0 32"4- ' PROF; BANKS, OFFICE BI DC. 3 -PUBLIC PR0***Z * BAANSTABM' MASS. �► I i639. >ti.BUILDING D VISI N �ry r DATE rISSUED .. 11/1'7/2000 EX21RA`.CION' DATE � r �. i THIS PERMIT-CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET,ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF, EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY.EN- CROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION.STREET OR -. ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BE OBTAINED FROMTHEDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS •!�<PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION;RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM O FOUR CALL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND` . FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: WHERE APPLICABLE, SEPARATE 1...FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS THIS CARD KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION "2. PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS HAS BEEN MADE.WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCU- PERMITS -ARE. REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND MECH- (READY TO LATH). PANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH BUILDING"SHALL NOT BE 3.INSULATION. _ OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN ANICAL INSTALLATIONS. MADE. 4:FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. k VISIBLEPOST THIS CARD SO IT IS I BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS 2 2 3 1 HEATING INSPECTION APPROVALS� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2 BOARD OF HEALTH OTHER: SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL I I I i II WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND:VOID IF CON- INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS THE INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE STRUCT16N WORK IS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX• CARD CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY VARIOUS STAGES OF CONSTRUC- MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED.AS TELEPH,ONE.OR WRITTEN NOTIFICA- TION. NOTED ABOVE. _TION. BUILDING PERMIT TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Map , , _g y Parcel o f y Permit# 513 Health Division L z% - � Date Issued Conservation Division = Fee Tax Collector - �� ►60 SYSTEM �. 11�457 MUST�E Treasurer s k� ALLE�I1I COMPLIANCE H TITLES, Planning Dept. S ENVIRONMENTAL Cob[,: Date Definitive Plan Appro d by Planning Board TOWN RECULAT101gS� ` Historic-OKH Preservation/Hyannis Project Street Address es _S.A ov Village _ e�:OAl�L y Owner �� 6o7,�.wE 22,Al k--el k Address U .4"0/ AX k 6 Telephone Permit Request e-W &o Y± '42- 'i G C Square feet: 1st floor: existing .(av proposed 6 Z 2nd floor: existing proposed Total new Z�6 Estimated Project Cost 6c>9&7o• Zoning District .�le &.r4 Flood Plain '2.9hC Groundwater Overlay Construction Type &food Lot Size ran dfathered: ❑Yes ❑No If yes, attach supporting documentation. . Dwelling Type: Single Family ❑ Two Family ❑ Multi-Family(#units) ` Age of Existing Structure _J f Historic House: ❑Yes RNo On Old King's Highway: ❑Yes ❑No Basement Type: ❑Full ❑Crawl ❑Walkout aOther 5X4;4 oi. Basement Finished Area(sq.ft.) Basement Unfinished Area(sq.ft) Number of Baths: Full:existing new Half: existing new ~ Number of Bedrooms: existing new Total Room Count(not including baths): existing new First Floor Room Count Heat Type and Fuel: )4 Gas ❑Oil ❑ Electric ❑Other Central Air: ` ,Yes ❑No Fireplaces: Existing New Existing wood/coal stove: ❑Yes ❑No Detached garage:❑existing ❑new size Pool:❑existing ❑new size Barn:❑existing ❑new size Attached garage:❑existing ❑new size Shed:❑existing ❑new size Other: Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization ❑ Appeal# -01 Recorded❑ Commercial Yes '❑No If yes, site plan review# &?3,;N9 t0c> n Current Use Ao S/ 6-i-T Ire- Proposed Use alz " ale BUILDER INFORMATION Name �A Telephone Number 40-3- d6. _QQ Address ,�✓j, - License# CS 6 093S' ,ARJ 41, ,, Home Improvement Contractor# Worker's Compensation# AZC1 9/0 ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO R e:Z j . SIGNATURE DATE 7 0 a FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY i PERMIT NO DATE ISSUED~ ` r MAP/PARCEL NO. " "?+ r i ~ .Y�.'Y ,. '' •t r � yam' ~ jr , _- .k • " i , —• •. ADDRESS VILLAGE i OWNER ~' DATE OF INSPECTION: ) ; FOUNDATION FRAME INSULATION FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL: ROUGH FINAL PLUMBING: ROUGH "" FINAL , - ,-GAS: ROUGH; > FINAL_ f FINAL BUILDING DATE CLOSED OUT ' ASSOCIATION PLAN NO. A July 21, 1998 United States Postal Service Facilities Service Office c/o Kathleen Walker 6 Griffin Road North Windsor, CT 06006-0300 Dear Ms. Walker: Based on our conversat 11 ion on July 1, I have discussed the expansion of the Cotuit Post Office with the Church Board of Trustees The such,Board d is w interested wou d like in working i with the USPS in fulfilling your building nee ds. As to explore the two possibilities originally explained to us: 1. Financing provided by the Church with USPS commitment for a f ixe ed d ombenf the period. of years (e.g. 20 years) and with the Church owning the property 2. Financing completely provided by the USPS. Please contact Ken Molloy at 508-428-3815 when you are ready for further discussion. Sincerely, Joyce Howard Board of Trustees Cc: [Name(s)l Cotuit Federated Church . t : Cotuit , MA November 03 , 1998 After a brief discussion with Kathleen Walker of the U.S. Postal Service on her cell phone, it was determined there was no planned- meeting at the Cotuit Federated Church or Post Office .today. However she extended the writer an invitation to meet with the Town of Barnstable officials, and she, as set. up by Mr John Anderson, working with the Town Council , _ . LOCATION: Town of Barnstable Town Hall offices of the Town Manager/Town council . PRESENT: Town Council : Richard W. Clark President Jacalyn--A. Barton Precinct Seven Town Manager: James Tinsley . United States Postal Service : Thomas G. .Day District Manager,- Providence District, Providence, , RI Kathleen Walker Real Estate Specialist Eastern Service Team, Windsor, CT F Cotuit Federated Church w R. B. Scales'Trustee Discussion of the Cotuit Post -Office Facilities . We were informed • that before the Postal Service can proceed with any action relative to changes to , the Postal Service in - any town or city they must meet with the highest' elected official of that town or.. city. In our case, Mr C1ark: Then within sixty days .they must arrange for a public meeting so that all interested parties may be informed of any changes . x Presently Cotuit Post Office haIs1121 boxes , with a waiting. list , and hope to add 500 more boxes — Presently Cotuit has three rural routes operating out of the existing building, and in the future hope to increase this number to. four._ Relative to the expansion of Cotuit 'goes. as follows ##1 Expand the present building ##2 Expand another existing, build'ing on another site : ##3 Build a new building on another site. One option that was brought up was the possibility of making Cotuit strictly a retail site . No rural routes , stamps, boxes , . etc. This did not seem to go over very well . As of now the Postal Service has an architect on board. McKinnell , McKinnell , and Taylor P .O. Box 336 Norwell , MA 02061 The architect will contact Ken Molloy, as design progresses . Relative to above mentioned public meeting, it has been set as follows . December 15 , 1998 7 : 00 PM Freedom Hall Host Cotuit/Santuit Civic,Association Confirmed with Peggy McGarrahan Strictly to discuss U.S.P.S . , no other business Assessor's map and lot, number ............ .... :.... . .•.�...:�. �J �,i�"�` � /�� J . Sewage Permit number '...,....�1 �..... ' . SEPTIC SYSTEM 'MUST BE `yr INSTALLED IN GQMPLIANCE *T"Er TOWN OF BARNS ", IE, STATE`. AND TOWN Z' REGULATIONS B9HaSTnnLE, "fig - �UILDIN•G INSPECTOR �p i6.39. `00 'e0 MPY a' APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ...... .o•Q.....:.l.o.....L:v.s.:TL.Nz.... .......................... TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ........W0 0.D...l tr................................................. ....................... s� !.Y. .e.. .4..................19 .. TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The' undersigned hereby applies for a permit according to the following information: Location .................. C.Y�.� +r....��..1...fit .. ...T........... ... .................................... ProposedUse ............. CJ`:j'...1 .4=.1i C� ........:.......... ............................................................. ................................ c ...................Fire District ....a'.a...Q.1. %.............................................. Zoning District .......�... .................................... Name of Owner x�. i .lf6..1... E=%'dit)4 E.13.. b.y-A*ress ...... .� .... �J .L:.�..... �t�`:.7 V:.., . Name of Builder ��,��i.��::..5:..�..�j��/.'Y././�.�/'.....Address Name of Architect ................Address .................................................. .................................................................................... Numberof Rooms ....................................................Foundation O.t'1. I :..r.. .............................................. Exterior .... ...... Ali.1 j,6.1'I(b'S...Roofing 's'Ali.IaAf'. 9,&.7 r.�.l'7!1. �. .+ ........... Floors ......... f.ill�/�....... / -.L...................................Interior .. .f�L.'—/ ./..f. f../l7 .......................:.................... Heating ... . -4XI .1. .�.,,A... :(.c.. -A:5�.................Plumbing .......r �. ............. ....................... �Y . Fireplace .................... ..�.....................................................Approximate Cost�.,�„�. �::�.a�...�.... ...... Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board ________________________________19________. - AreaG(........................ Diagram of Lot and Building with Dimensions Fee ,��t.. ................. ........................... SUBJECT TO APPROVAL F BO RD OF HEALTH 40 1 y I hereby .agree to conform to all the Rules and Regulations of the Town of Barnstable regarding the above construction. N !!!2�• am .� �.2„•.�� •............... Cotuit Federated Church No .... Perm"it'for .........�d to Post ...................... Offi. e ...................... ........................................................ Locati on -46— Srhool S�reet t I .............. ............ ............. ..................... ........................... ................... (jwner ............Q�Q�uit Federated Church 4 ............................................... Cr .00 fr Type of Construction ..........f MR(� r". ..................... < ........................................................................... Plot ....... .................... Lot ............ November-Z24 ",q 78 Permit G�antecl ........... ......................... .......... Date of, Inspection ........n' li —1 9 ............ Date Com' pl;ted ....... ...T199 Ir .,zPERMIT'REFUSED 'JI: ................................................................ 19 Ile ........................................ 41� ;� I- ol� 4.w ............................................................................... /0 ............................................................................... c1f ......................................................... ................... le ...................... Approved .................... ...... 19 ............... ............................................................... . ................ ...................................................... r NOTES 18 2"x 2"x 1/8"ALUM.ANGLE y 19 PAINT PROLUX BLUE#8220-20 ; 20 3/4"#1-COUNTERSUNK PHILLIPS SCREWS 21 1 /2"x 1 1/2"x 1/8"ALUM.AN CUT 3",INCHES SHORTER THAN SIGN ` 20 19 22 DRILL 5/8"HOLES FOR MOUNTING HARDWARE h 23 ATTACH TO WALL AS REQUIRED { 24 1/B"ALUM FLAT BAR 1 28 19 18 / 21 22 25 WELD TO TOP,&BOTTOM MOUNTING ANGLES FOR LEVEL INSTALLATION 26 1/8"ALUM.SHEET METAL t 27 DECORATE WITH 3M VINYL GRAPHICS Iti 28 WELD TOGETHER 29 GLUE&TACK WELD IN PLACE 30 , RED VINYL F 31 + WHITE VINYL 32'` USE ARTWORK PROVIDED BY CUSTOMER 33' CUT 6"LARGER THAN SIGN FOR INSTALL TO FACE FRAME 23 29t 27 19 26 " - 4 , 4'-4 1/4• 24 25 26 -19 31 32 r 30 32 0 31 32 t 8" EQ EQ 6. RS 6 CUSTOM FRONT VIEW SCALE: 1"=1' DETA, IL 1 SCALE: 3"=-P COTUIT MAIN POST OFFICE DRAWN BY: J.LIMLAW SCALE AS SHOWN TITLE: RS 6 CUSTOM NI SIGN 4 OF 5 555 Hall Avenue E. P.O.BOX 236 45 SCHOOL STREET Renfrew,Ontario KTV 4A3 COTUIT MA 02635 ' DATE: 19/11/01' REVISION: N01 DATE: 17/1/02 SS TINS ACC.FXEC. . t ) I CHANGED SIZE OF SIGN FOR PERMIT REASONS FILE: TWS6768.DWG 67� ;Tel.: 888 830-8030 �i �--' SIGNS INC. Fax 613 432-8578 These drawings,include technical specifications and engineering that are tt,e property of Trsf'.Tld Signs Inc.and sha0 FINAL ® PAGE: not be reproduced,copied or used for manufacturing without previous written authorization ferr,Transworld Signs Inc. Fpr-007 Rev:00 Effective Date:.320/01 � ;I EQ 4'-4 1/4' EQ ALIGN. wbam�. Po.�. C—K 0 0 0 PIS 6 ' 02 t NOTES: I. UJALL 51GN 15 8 50. FT. f` 6 ^16 COTUIT MAIN POST OFFICE DRAWN BY: , J.LI. W SCALE: NTS TITLE: ELEVATION 2 9F .5 555 Hall Avenue E. RO.BOX 236 45 SCHOOL STREET COTUIT MA 02635 �„� DATE: 19/11/01 REVISION: .N01 DATE: 17/1/02 SS' TWS Renfrew,Ontario K7V 4A3 -" ACC.EXEC. XEC. � ��®��,® .jel.:(888)830-8030 FILE: TWS6768.DWG SIZE OF RS 6 WAS CHANGED DUE TO 6768 Fax: 613 432-8578 PERMIT REASONS SIGNS ING ( ) These drawings,include technical specifications and engineering that are the property of Transworld Signs Inc.and shed FINAL ® PAGE: not be reproduced,copied or used for manufacturing without previous written authorizatio"from Transwodd Signs Inc. . Fpr-007 Rev:00 Effective Date:3/20j07 B 06 A N PROPERTY LINE 1 08 I 0 01 —� N 07 N N 02 N N pp•� 0 c .N I 09 N 1 0 I I o, 0 ® O__O 00 / 66 'I 10 B N A j6 IL w t ' Y � COTUIT MAIN POST OFFICE DRAV✓N BY: J.LIMLAW SCALE: NTS TITLE: SITE PLAN 1 of 5 555 Hall Avenue E. P.O.BOX 236 45 SCHOOL STREET Renfrew,Ontario_ K7V 4A3 COTUIT MA 02635 �}" DATE: 19/11/01 REVISION: 00 DATE: TWS 19RAN'SWORLD Tel.:(888)830-8030 ACC.EXEC. ' . FILE: TWS6768.DWG 6768 Fax 613 432-8578 g p of Transworid signs Inc.and span FINAL PAGE: SIGNS ING ( ) These drawings,include technical s ecifications and engineering that are the property not be reproduced,copied or used for manufacturing without previous written authorizatiori from Transworld Signs Inc. Fpr-007 Rev:00 Effective Date:320/01