Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0262 OCEAN VIEW AVENUE - Health
262 Ocean View Drive. Cotuit A=033 —002 1 M NVIRONMENTAL LANDSCAPE CONSULTANTS,LLC Certified Consulting Arborists,Horticulturists and Conservation Designer's Natural Landscape Design and Tree,Shrub and Lawn Care Services Consultation,Education,Permitting,Installation and Management July 30, 2013 For: Secretary Richard K. Sullivan, Jr. Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) Attn: MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 From: Michael Talbot, MCH, ISA, ASCA Conservation Consultant, Society of Wetland Scientists Massachusetts Certified Horticulturist and Landscape Designer Massachusetts Association of Conservation Commissions I.S.A. Certified Arborist, American Society of Consulting Arborists i7Ma§s Certificate in Invasive Species Management Transmitted by mail (two copies) Cc: Department of Environmental Protection(DEP) Boston Office DEP/Southeastern Regional Office Massachusetts Department of Transportation(DOT) Massachusetts DOT District Office Massachusetts Historical Commission Cape Cod Commission Let C.) . Barnstable Town Council ��, Town of Barnstable Conservation Division •-- .,� Town of Barnstable Planning Board u. Vfown of Barnstable Health Division Coastal Zone Management `' Division of Marine Fisheries (South Shore) David J. Der Hagopian, Trustee Kevin Kirrane, Attorney, Dunning, Kirrane, McNichols & Garner, LLP Re: ENF Filing for David J. Der Hagopian,Trustee; David J. Der Hagopian Trust; 265 Ocean View Avenue,Barnstable, MA To Secretary Sullivan and to whom it may concern: On May 9, 2013, after the Barnstable Conservation Commission had unanimously closed the hearing and approved the project for the David J. Der Hagopian Trust for property at 265 Ocean View Avenue in the Cotuit Village of Barnstable, an Order of Conditions (OOC) was issued for the project. This project is very simple: remove old,rotting wooden stairs providing access to a coastal beach, as well as a small,hazardous wooden deck, and replace them with new,better designed access stairs and a new P.O.Box 187,Mashpee,MA 02649 www.ELCNewEngland.com Office:508-539-1912 Email:info@talbotecolandcare.com Fax:508-539-8865 ENF Filing for David J.Der Hagopian Trust Environmental Landscape Consultants LLC deck of about the same size. The project also includes management of significant populations of invasive species on the coastal dune in particular and restoration of native habitats—all beyond the requirements of the Barnstable Conservation Commission for mitigation and funded entirely by the proponent. Because of an apparent, ongoing dispute with a neighbor, Mr. Richard Bendetson, this neighbor chose to appeal the OOC for this project to the MassDEP and requested a negative Superseding Order of Conditions. MassDEP now requires that the proponent, David J. Der Hagopian, Trustee, file an Environmental Notification Form (ENF)with MEPA before the MassDEP can rule on this appeal. With that, Environmental Landscape Consultants LLC (ELC)has developed this ENF on behalf of the proponent. This ENF filing includes the following attachments: • The WPA Form 3 for the Notice of Intent(NOI) filing with the Mass DEP and the Town of Barnstable Conservation Commission • The revised NOI Narrative with details on the project, as approved by the Barnstable Conservation Commission • An 8.5"x I I" copy of the USGS locus map at a 1:24,000 scale locating the project • A surveyed site plan titled"Existing Conditions", developed by the BSC Group, dated 12/13/12 and revised 1/23/13 • A project plan titled"Conservation Landscape Plan: Stair&Deck Reconstruction", developed by ELC, dated 2/13/13 and revised 4/9/13 • A set of construction specifications and plan sketches titled"Beach Stair Plan&Details", developed by Yarosh Associates, Inc. and dated 6/27/13 • A document developed by ELC with a scientific discussion of black locust as an invasive species and titled"Black Locust and its adverse environmental effects"; this document was presented to the Barnstable Conservation Commission to demonstrate the importance of managing black locust on the dunes as part of this project • The OOC issued by the Barnstable Conservation Commission for this project. A copy of the Public Notice of Environmental Review form sent to the Barnstable Patriot for publication of the ENF notice is also included in the packet to the MEPA Office. The notice will be published on August 2, 2013. Along with the two copies of the complete filing submitted to the MEPA office, ELC has sent a complete filing to all of the appropriate agencies and municipal departments listed on the previous page under"Cc". This is done in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). The complete list of the persons, agencies and municipal departments receiving this filing includes: Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner's Office . One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 July 30,2013 Page 2 ENF Filing for David J.Der Hagopian Trust Environmental Landscape Consultants LLC DEP/Southeastern Regional Office Attn: MEPA Coordinator 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Public/Private Development Unit 10 Park Plaza Boston, MA 02116 Massachusetts DOT District Office Attn: MEPA Coordinator Box 111 1000 County Street Taunton, MA 02780 1 Massachusetts Historical Commission The Massachusetts Archives Building 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 Cape Cod Commission 3225 Main Street Barnstable, MA 02630 Barnstable Town Council Attn: Barbara Ford, Acting Administrator/MEPA Review 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Town of Barnstable Planning Board Attn: Design/MEPA Review Planner 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Town of Barnstable Conservation Division Attn: Rob Gatewood, Administrator 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Town of Barnstable Health Division Attn: Thomas Mckean/MEPA Review 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Coastal Zone Management Attn: Project Review Coordinator July 30,2013 Page 3 i ENF Filing for David J.Der Hagopian Trust Environmental Landscape Consultants LLC 251 Causeway Street, Suite 800 Boston, MA 02114 Division of Marine Fisheries (South Shore) Attn: Environmental Reviewer 1213 Purchase Street- 3rd Floor New Bedford, MA 02740-6694 If there are any questions,please do not hesitate to contact our office. Thank you for your consideration. i A July 30,2013 Page 4 ------ - -- r---- - -- � -, _ _----- - I-- -- — 070°26'80.00'I WI I # 1 ! 1 ! Io7io°?6'`o.00°IW I I I i P 70°25'30.iI ,00°w tIlIIF �+GT® "''�'`- Y� �i � .^9� �y' � f•�•+�'� a +��6 r",=at a ;� r F +i " x 3 17 O F .:rt` 3 i! '••,.., x { �+$ has t.A •,.e�' • f p y _ M M + �� � � *' � � 'hs� • ;'.." x^ � � � °�—'"�, 3'4e ��,�{+"��•`t w�'u'� �f d�'"t rr°�t.�a,.: } —O - 4 r or --- •�,.' y •.rat 4j�_� ,ti- ._� r�` '. ""'+may,' - '"�.��, .x" � d,y /r � �i= >r. �•"S� -- [ r 8 f ��'�'..+4 � - i A 3•, � — Mir Z OR g,e+ `�, s! "^ +�'*•���,,, i•Zip•�• e•.... s`x :� � .4. � "�.d t�°" !� F Y Q— . -�, ._ ��.is a"' � .. - #.. - •`{.ba'� x.Y. YI' lytr'.�d�, i$51��s� ,°F - � �" Yak. t` < Is•r ..y@ �' T �o I X" ^t "344, "� x �.� F t i *� i �` e.y i` t 4 ,a !d.' n •t s eS 7f E t ('s•"� � rs i k" ^9 • AI -i# +y�•.. �•�t. '� � ,� u'r• l r. .r PIr ."t. x 1� ! a r -''•k�+d .�1= 't y ;•i l { a'...+r' t`" ' f d� �«_"t.'s r•+�E , F l J Ael a 00 o f•" r s f f I t ;d td r {> {" 4rf jri . d sif a o s M 4Pif�Is, {�5 "+'"�, F t�. ' . .♦ .' ' •. " Cta s" " V7 ° i 6 - _o .sa f r ••:{ .L t .4, ♦ �.-d`f, -. O — �w:y _ �9.�,., J• •. � t-; �i,a �` F r m .� .. 'l'r� F` +tr �t ♦�" t f+' ��� � •— 41 x + . 's' IF ;. +t tw+ •.+ A9•f *#.{ s. t .t 4•44Wdye . � t I Ji t•�. d *. •. .' r+C is.' �,p`+P .�,t ,"Isar+. . .�` — x. _• sy " �R.d► { �. f r f "k♦ s { .�f "y'.�' .� f ! � ��� t . •, '•` ,r �' " s s.t' 8 t" , 1 J •si..s s= ad'1 i� �'Y,�' �# F tar Ps �, '„'° � fa s t` B i• "�f' ' a° �, .. s�t. :,���� t f r#'',i 16°W $ F ,�f . I I I } I I ! ! I L 070°26' 0�00'W I i I }*'I I '070°26`0.00"IWI 11 f I I 070°25'30.b0"Vet ! ! { Name:COTUIT Location: 041°36'23.7" N 0700 26' 10.3" W Date:2/14/2013 Caption:265 Ocean View Avenue Seale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Cotuit, MA Copyright(C)1997,Maptech,Inc. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office Environmental Notification Form For Office Use Only EEA#: ; MEPA Analyst: The information requested on this form must be completed in order to submit a document electronically for review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name: Conservation Restoration/Stair and Deck Reconstruction Street Address: 265 Ocean View Avenue Municipality: Barnstable Cotuit Watershed: Cape Cod Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinate Latitude: 41.60678' N Zone 19 x: 380223 Longitude: 70.43721° W Zone 19 y: 4607080 Estimated commencement date: 10/21/13 Estimated completion date: 6/30/14 Project Type: Replacement/Conservation Status of project design: 100%complete Restoration Proponent: David J. Der Hagopian, Trustee; David J. Der Hagopian Trust . Street Address: 1900 Summit Tower Boulevard Municipality: Orlando I State: FL Zip Code: 32810 Name of Contact Person: Michael Talbot, MCH, ISA Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLI Address: P.O. Box 187 Municipality: Mashpee State: MA Zip Code: 02649-0187 Phone: 508-539-1912 Fax: 508-539-8865 info@talbotecolandcare.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? ' r ❑Yes ®No If this is an Expanded Environmental Notification Form (ENF) (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) or a Notice of Project Change (NPC), are you requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) ❑Yes ❑No a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) []Yes [:]No a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes [:]No ` a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) ❑Yes ❑No (Note: Greenhouse Gas Emissions analysis must be included in the Expanded ENF.) Which MEPA review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03)? (3) Wetlands, Waterways and Tidelands; (b) 1. Provided that a Permit is required: a. alteration of coastal dune,barrier beach or coastal bank; Which State Agency Permits will the project require? MassDEP Superseding Order of Conditions (SOC) Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an Agency of the Commonwealth, including the Agency name and the amount of funding or land area in acres: (done Effective January 2011 I Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total & Environmental Impacts Total site acreage 0.36 New acres of land altered 0.27 ac Acres of impervious area 0.00 0.00 0.00 Square feet of new bordering 0.00 vegetated wetlands alteration Square feet of new other wetland alteration 11,961 sq ft Acres of new non-water dependent use of tidelands or waterways 0.00 Gross square footage 260 sq ft +72 sq ft 332 sq ft Number of housing units None None None Maximum height (feet) N/A N/A N/A TRANSPORTATION Vehicle trips per day None None None Parking spaces None None None WASTEWATER Water Use (Gallons per day) None None None Water withdrawal (GPD) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wastewater generation/treatment 0.00 0.00 0.00 (GPD) Length of water mains (miles) 0.00 0.00 V Length of sewer mains (miles) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Has this project been filed with MEPA before? ❑ Yes (EEA# ) ®No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? ❑ Yes (EEA# ) ®No -2- GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION — all proponents must fill out this-section PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Describe the existing conditions and land uses on the project site: The site is a small, residentially zoned parcel of undeveloped land seaward of a public road and including a coastal bank, coastal dune and coastal beach. The site is adjacent to a public beach owned by the Town of Barnstable (Loop Beach)to the south and privately owned land to the north in a residential neighborhood of the Village of Cotuit. The only use of the site is for pedestrian access to the beach in the form of narrow wooden stairs and a small. 8 foot x 12 foot wooden deck/landing presently located on the northern property boundary. There is a narrow foot path from the stairs through the dune to the beach used infrequently by the residents of the home and their guests in the summer to access the beach for passive recreational activity. The existing wooden stairs and deck were built decades ago and are now rotted and hazardous Their construction does not meet best construction practices for access walkways on a coastal bank. Please refer to the attached Notice of Intent(NOI) narrative for more details on and photographs of the condition of the stairs and deck and the attached surveyed site plan, titled. "Existing Conditions" dated 12113112 revised 1123113 and developed by the BSC Group, for information on the existinq conditions resource delineations and location of the existinq stairs and deck. The coastal bank, consisting primarily of woodland and shrubland habitat, and both a primary and secondary coastal dune are well vegetated and include substantial populations of invasive and aggressive species This includes a spreading infestation of black locust(Robinia Pseudoacacia) and Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius) adversely affecting the coastal dune and a section of sandplain heathland on the southern end of the property, which is even visible on Google Earth. The secondary dune is vegetatively dominated almost exclusively by invasive and non-native species, including multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) and shrub and vine honeysuckle (Lonicera spp.) Please refer to the attached NOI narrative and the information document on black locust and invasive species issues and management, titled "Black Locust and its adverse environmental effects"for photographs and further information on the resource areas, other invasive species and the native plants observed on the site. Describe the proposed project and its programmatic and physical elements: The proposed project would remove and properly dispose of the existing, rotting, hazardous wooden stairs and deck by hand and replace them with a new set of wooden stairs and a new wood deck of approximately equal size in a slightly altered layout approximately four to ten feet off the property boundary—done at the neighbor's request. The removal of the existing stairs and deck will only take several days at most and once the existing stairs and deck are removed, this area will be protected from any potential for erosion by the installation of erosion netting. The potential for erosion on this portion of the coastal bank is minimal because of the existence of an extensive network of plant roots in the area. Revegetation of this area will be done within one week or so of installation of the erosion netting using native species (see below for more details on revegetation.) The minor square foot addition of total structure construction is primarily the approved addition of stair landings to both reduce fatigue and increase safety for those using the steps and to offset the lavout of the stairs to reduce the potential for erosion. There will be a very minor alteration in the path to the beach to connect to the new stair location; any portion of the existing path no longer used will be re-vegetated with native plant species. Please refer to the NOI Narrative and the landscape plan titled "Conservation Landscape Plan: Stair& Deck Reconstruction"by Environmental Landscape Consultants LLC (ELC), dated 2/13/13 and revised 419113, for more details on the site layout of the new stairs and deck. The new stairs and deck will meet the best construction practices for beach access stairs on a coastal bank as set forth by the Town of Barnstable's Wetland Protection Ordinance and as successfully approved and installed throughout the coastal areas of Cape Cod. This includes raising the stairs and deck above grade -3- and settinq posts in hand-dug post holes without concrete—thus -greatly eliminating any adverse impact on the roots of existing and new vegetation or the stability of the coastal bank. The stability of the coastal bank will,_be further protected by altering the stair layout to offset the path of travel down the bank. This further reduces the potential of erosion, especially as compared to the existing steps set into the bank grade and aligned in a straight, steep path of travel down the entire length of the bank. All work will be done by hand without use of heavy equipment and should be completed within one to two weeks of the removal of the existing stairs and deck. The stairs are limited to a total of four feet in width. Please refer to the attached NOI Narrative and the sketch of construction details for the stairs and deck. titled "Beach Stair Plan & Details"by Yarosh Associates, Inc. and dated 6127113, for more details on the limited site construction work proposed in this project. The project requires only minor impacts on vegetation on the coastal bank—mostly to permit a new layout for the stairs and deck away from the property boundary at the neighbor's request and for management of invasive species and native plant revegetation in a limited area of the coastal bank. Thus, the project, as approved by the Town of Barnstable Conservation Commission, requires only a small amount of mitigation work to compensate for this prolect's very minor impacts. Nonetheless, the project proponent has offered to carry out extensive management of invasive species, especially for the most vulnerable resource areas—the coastal dune and the sandplain heathland—at his own expense to enhance the overall conservation values of the site. The project proponent has also agreed to cut invasive and aggressive vines adversely affecting native trees elsewhere on the coastal bank. The principal "site alterations"will be management of all invasive species on the coastal dune and a portion of the coastal bank in the area adjacent to the existing and new steps and deck and revegetation with native plants. Removal of invasive species will be primarily done by hand using cut stump treatment methods commonly used for invasive species management—a method that keeps the root systems intact to protect dune soils and bank stability until revegetation is completed and new vegetation is established. Any hand removal of invasive plants, such as Scotch broom and shrub honeysuckle,.wiII include shaking off any attached soils to avoid removal of sediment from the dunes. Please refer to the attached NOI narrative, the attached Conservation Landscape Plan, and the information document on black locust and invasive species issues and management for more details—including details on techniques for management of invasive species. As invasive species are removed and managed, open areas will then be re-vegetated within about one or two weeks at most using appropriate native species in order to restore specific plant habitats on the site. The project includes revegetation of the area where the existing stairs and deck will be removed and installation of native plants below the new stairs and deck, where appropriate. Stormwater management includes installation of erosion netting to protect open areas from erosion and installation of silt barriers to protect against any possible sedimentation of the dunes. The extensive plant list for proposed revegetation is on the Conservation Landscape Plan. The project proposes to carry out invasive plant management and native plant revegetation over a three year period in phases to limit the area of impact by removal of invasive vegetation at any one time. There are no infrastructure requirements for this project. Please refer to the attached NOI narrative, the attached Conservation Landscape Plan, and the information document on black locust and invasive species issues and management for more details on site revegetation and erosion protection measures included in this proiect. Finally, the proiect includes a minimum three year management plan for eradication of invasive species and revegetation with native plants to restore native plant habitats—including some rare and endangered 'habitats. This management plan includes yearly reporting requirements to the Barnstable Conservation Commission through the experienced conservation staff of the Town of Barnstable. Please refer to the attached NOI narrative for more details. NOTE: The project description should summarize both the project's direct and indirect impacts (including construction period impacts) in terms of their magnitude, geographic extent, duration -4- and frequency, and reversibility, as applicable. It should also discuss the infrastructure requirements of the project and the capacity of the municipal and/or regional infrastructure to sustain these requirements into the future. Describe the on-site project alternatives (and alternative off-site locations, if applicable), considered by the proponent, including at least one feasible alternative that is allowed under current zoning, and the reasons(s)that they were not selected as the preferred alternative: The only alternative to the conservation restoration, including management of invasive species and restoration of native plant communities, is to do nothing. Clearly the project alternative proposed here substantially enhances wildlife habitat value over the alternative by increasing both biodiversity and restoring native plant habitats. This project also protects existing native trees from the adverse impacts of aggressive and invasive vines, especially Oriental bittersweet(Celastrus orbiculatus.) The interests of coastal dunes are further enhanced by eradication of black locusts. This species is already developing into a dense, monotypic stand that will shade out native graminoid species, especially American beachgrass (Ammophila brevAgulata.) Nitrogen fixation by black locusts also enhances the environment for other invasive species. Finally, the extensive, dense, shallow root system of black locusts tend to diminish the function of dunes to accrete sediment and wave-induced sediment transport along the coast or to a barrier island (such as Sampson's Island)during major storm events. See the attached document on black locusts for more details. The only alternatives to removal of the existing hazardous stairs and replacement are: 1. Do nothing: this alternative is not acceptable as the authorized access to the beach by residents is now dangerous because of both the configuration and the condition of the wooden stairs and deck. One person has already fallen through the rotting deck, for example. 2. Devise a raised, wooden ramp/access boardwalk that would traverse the coastal bank and switch back to the base of the bank: we proposed such an alternative originally to the Barnstable Conservation Commission; as such a ramp access system exists on the neighboring property. The Barnstable Conservation Commission asked that we reconsider such a plan and revise the plan to show a more conventional set of stairs and deck—a plan that would essentially replace the wooden access stairway and deck that exists now and has been on the site for decades. The Conservation Commission was concerned about the amount of vegetation that would be disturbed by this alternative. The proponent agreed to consider an alternative plan, and we met with the Conservation Administrator, Rob Gatewood, to develop this plan—which included moving the stairs and deck away from the property boundary as requested by the neighbor. The revised plan was unanimously approved by the Barnstable Conservation Commission and is the plan of record attached with this filin NOTE: The purpose of the alternatives analysis is to consider what effect changing the parameters and/or siting of a project, or components thereof,'will have on the environment, keeping in mind that the objective of the MEPA review process is to avoid or minimize damage to the environment to the greatest extent feasible. Examples of alternative projects include alternative site locations, alternative site uses, and alternative site configurations. Summarize the mitigation measures-proposed to offset the impacts of the preferred alternative: The mitigation measures we propose include the extensive restoration of native plant communities on the coastal dune and in a section of the coastal bank. Furthermore, native trees elsewhere on the coastal bank will be protected from aggressive and invasive vines that could adversely affect their health and viability. If the project is proposed to be constructed in phases, please describe each phase: -5- The replacement of the existing stairs and deck will be done in one phase. The conservation restoration work on the coastal dune and the coastal bank will be done in three phases: 1. The area of the coastal bank approved for restoration and the dune areas adjacent to the work site will be done during and immediately after construction of the new stairs and deck. 2. The removal of the black locusts and the restoration of the primary dune elsewhere on the property will Proceed next—possibly during the winter. 3. The restoration of the secondary dune areas elsewhere on the property will be done the following season. 4. The three year monitoring and management period will begin upon completion of the conservation restoration work. AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project within or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No if yes, does the ACEC have an approved Resource Management Plan?_Yes _No; If yes, describe how the project complies with this plan. Will there be stormwater runoff or discharge to the designated ACEC? Yes No; If yes, describe and assess the potential impacts of such stormwater runoff/discharge to the designated ACEC. RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated and/or Priority Habitat of State-Listed Rare Species? (see http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/regulatory_review/priority_habitat/priority_habitat_home.htm) ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ❑Yes (Specify. ) ®No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? ❑Yes (Specify ) []No WATER RESOURCES: Is there an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW)on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? _Yes X No; if yes, identify the ORW and its location. (NOTE. Outstanding Resource Waters include Class A public water supplies, their tributaries, and bordering wetlands; active and inactive reservoirs approved by MassDEP,certain waters within Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, and certified vernal pools. Outstanding resource waters are listed in the Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00.) Are there any impaired water bodies on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? _Yes X No; if yes, identify the water body and pollutant(s)causing the impairment: Is the project within a medium or high stress basin, as established by the Massachusetts Water Resources Commission? Yes X No STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Generally describe the project's stormwater impacts and measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in MassDEP's Stormwater Management Regulations: -6- This project is exempt from the MassDEP's Stormwater Management Regulations and does not require a filing and Stormwater Management Plan. In general this project has very minimal stormwater impacts; Primarily, the project protects against any potential stormwater runoff and ensuing erosion by installation of erosion netting and rapid revegetation of any open areas. The stairs and decks are built above grade to allow root growth and vegetation below the decks and stairs. Silt barriers have been installed to protect against any potential sedimentation of the dune areas. MASSACHUSETTS CONTINGENCY PLAN: Has the project site been, or is it currently being, regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan? Yes _No X ; if yes, please describe the current status of the site(including Release Tracking Number(RTN), cleanup phase, and Response Action Outcome classification): Is there an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL)on any portion of the project site?Yes_ No X ; ' if yes, describe which portion of the site and how the project will be consistent with the AUL: Are you aware of any Reportable Conditions at the property that have not yet been assigned an RTN? Yes _No X ; if yes, please describe: SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE: If the project will generate solid waste during demolition or construction, describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal of, e.g., asphalt, brick, concrete, gypsum, metal, wood: The removal of the old, rotting wooden stairs and deck will generate approximately six cubic yards of debris Since it is not pressure treated wood it will be sent to All Cape Recycling in Falmouth for reuse as mulch or other usable materials. Invasive plant debris will be recycled at We Care Organics in Marstons Mills where it is converted to mulch or compost. (NOTE.Asphalt pavement, brick, concrete and metal are banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills and waste combustion facilities and wood is banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills. See 310 CMR 19.017 for the complete list of banned materials.) Will your project disturb asbestos containing materials?Yes _No X ; if yes, please consult state asbestos requirements at http://mass.gov/MassDEP/air/asbhom0l.htm Describe anti-idling and other measures to limit emissions from construction equipment: Construction equipment required for this project is limited to the trucks needed to carry staff and tools and to remove debris for recycling. Trucks are not left to idle during construction. DESIGNATED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER: Is this project site located wholly or partially within a defined river corridor of a federally designated Wild and Scenic River or a state designated'Scenic River?Yes_No X ; if yes, specify name of river and designation: If yes, does the project have the potential to impact any of the"outstandingly remarkable" resources of a federally Wild and Scenic River or the stated purpose of a state designated Scenic River? Yes _No _; if yes, specify name of river and designation: ; if yes, will the project will result in any impacts to any of the designated "outstandingly remarkable resources of the Wild and Scenic River or the stated purposes of a Scenic River. Yes _No if yes,describe the potential impacts to one or more of the"outstandingly remarkable" resources or stated purposes and mitigation measures proposed. -7- ATTACHMENTS: 1. List of all attachments to this document. Please refer to the cover letter attached to this form that includes a list of all attachments. 2. U.S.G.S. map(good quality color copy, 8-%x 11 inches or larger, at a scale of 1:24,000) indicating the project location and boundaries. The required map is attached. 3.. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions on the project site and its immediate environs, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, railroad rights-of-way, wetlands and water bodies, wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities. 4 Plan, at an appropriate scale, depicting environmental constraints on or adjacent to the project site such as Priority and/or Estimated Habitat of state-listed rare species, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, Chapter 91 jurisdictional areas, Article 97 lands,.wetland resource area delineations, water supply protection areas, and historic resources and/or districts. Attached. 5. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of proposed conditions upon completion of project(if construction of the project is proposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). Attached. 6. List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). Please refer to the cover letter attached to this form that includes a list of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF to date. 7. List of municipal and federal permits and reviews required by the project, as applicable. This project has received an Order of Conditions(OOC) from the Barnstable Conservation Commission. Due to an appeal of this OOC by the neighbor with MassDEP, this project awaits a Superseding Order of Conditions from Mass DER -8- LAND SECTION - all proponents must fill out this section I. Thresholds/Permits A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1)_Yes X No; if yes, specify each threshold: II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: Existinq Change Total Footprint of buildings 0.00 0.00 0.00 Internal roadways 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking and other paved areas 0.00 0.00 0.00 . Other altered areas (mostly restoration) 0.00 0.27 0.27 Undeveloped areas 0.09 0.09 0.09 ' Total: Project Site Acreage 0.36 0.36 0.36 B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last five years? _Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with prime state or locally important agricultural soils)will be converted to nonagricultural use? C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be inactive forestry use? _Yes X No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a forest management plan approved by the Department of Conservation and Recreation: D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97?_Yes X No; if yes, describe: E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction; agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction?— Yes X No; if yes, does the - project involve the release or modification of such restriction? Yes No; if yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? _Yes , X No; if yes, describe: { G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B?Yes_ No X ; if yes, describe: III. Consistency A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan Title:Barnstable Comprehensive Plan Date 2010 B. Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to: 1) economic development: N/A 2) adequacy of infrastructure: N/A 3) open space impacts::This project preserves and enhances natural areas and wetland resources, including coastal dunes. 4) compatibility with adjacent land uses: This project maintains compatibility with the land use of adjacent land, which includes a public beach and private property with identical land uses as the project parcel. C. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency(RPA) RPA: Cape Cod Commission -9- Title: Regional Policy Plan Date: October 30, 2008 D. Describe the project's consistency with that plan with regard to: 1) economic development: N/A 2) adequacy of infrastructure: N/A 3) open space impacts: This project preserves and enhances natural areas and wetland resources, including coastal dunes. - 10- f RARE SPECIES SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat(see 301 CMR 11.03(2))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: (NOTE.If you are uncertain, it is recommended that you consult with the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program(NHESP)prior to submitting the ENF.) B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? Yes X No C. Does the project site fall within mapped rare species habitat(Priority or Estimated Habitat?) in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas(attach relevant page)? _Yes X No. D. If you answered "No"to all questions A, B and C, proceed to the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Rare Species section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? _Yes_No. If yes, 1. Have you consulted with the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)? _Yes No; if yes, have you received a determination as to whether the project will result in the"take"of a rare species? _Yes_No; if yes, attach the letter of determination to this submission. 2. Will the project"take"an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A(see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _Yes_No; if yes, provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate rare species impacts 3. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat? 4. Has the site been surveyed for rare species in accordance with the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act? Yes_'No 4. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project? _Yes_No; if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? —Yes—No , B. Will the project"take"an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A(see also 321 CM 10.04)? _Yes _No; if yes, . . provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate impacts to significant habitat: - 11 - WETLANDS, WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION I. Thresholds/ Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands,waterways, and tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? X Yes_No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: This filing is required only because the neighbor to the north, Richard Bendetson, has filed an appeal with the MassDEP to our Order of Conditions from the Barnstable Conservation Commission and is requesting a Superseding Order of Conditions (SOC). MassDEP is requiring this ENF filing as a prerequisite to issuing a SOC because of"a. alteration of coastal dune,barrier beach or coastal bank." MassDEP specified alteration of a coastal bank in its letter requiring filing of an ENF. B. Does the project require any state permits(or a local Order of Conditions) related to wetlands, waterways, or tidelands? X Yes No; if yes, specify which permit: This project received an Order of Conditions from the Barnstable Conservation Commission, MassDEP #SE 003-5072. In its appeal the neighbor is requesting a Superseding Order of Conditions from MassDEP. C. If you answered No to both questions A and B proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered Y q � P pP Y "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below. II.Wetlands Impacts and Permits A. Does the require uire a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act P q (M.G.L. c.131A)? X Yes_No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed? X Yes No; if yes, list the date and MassDEP file number: SE 003-5072:filled 2/21/13; if yes, has a local Order of Conditions been issued? X Yes No; Was the Order of Conditions appealed? X Yes _No. Will the project require a Variance from the Wetlands regulations? Yes X No. B. Describe any proposed permanent or temporary impacts to wetland resource areas located on the project site: There will be a temporary disturbance to vegetation on the coastal bank—mostly invasive species—during removal of existing, rotting, hazardous wooden stairs and a small deck and construction of a new set of stairs and deck of approximately similar size in a slightly altered footprint. All disturbed areas will be revegetated with native plants, including a minimum three year monitoring and management plan. The construction of the new, raised, replacement wood stairs and deck will require hand dipping of narrow post holes for structural posts. Soil will be removed and stored offsite until required to fill the post holes immediately upon installation of the posts. Please refer to the attached NOI Narrative and the attached construction sketch, titled "Beach Stair Plan & Details"by Yarosh Associates, Inc. and dated 6127113, for more details. There will also be a temporary disturbance to vegetation on the coastal dune and a designated portion of the coastal bank during removal of invasive species and revegetation with native plant species. Please refer to the attached Conservation Landscape Plan, the attached NOI Narrative, and the attached document on invasive plants, titled "Black Locust and its adverse environmental effects"for more details on the minor, temporary impacts during construction and conservation restoration work for this proiect. C. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: Coastal Wetlands Area (square feet)or Temporary or Length (linear feet) Permanent Impact? Land Under the Ocean - 12- f Designated Port Areas Coastal Beaches Coastal Dunes 10,650 square feet Temporary Impact Barrier Beaches Coastal Banks 170 linear feet Temporary Impact Rocky Intertidal Shores Salt Marshes Land Under Salt Ponds Land Containing Shellfish Fish Runs Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Inland Wetlands Bank(If) Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Isolated Vegetated Wetlands Land under Water Isolated Land Subject to Flooding Borderi ng Land Subject to Flooding Riverfront Area D. Is any part of the project: 1. proposed as a limited project? _Yes X No; if yes, what is the area (in sf)? 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? _Yes X No; if yes, describe: 3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? X Yes; a portion of the wooden access stairs and replacement deck are in a V Zone, although we moved the deck upslope slightly from its present, grandfathered location to move most of the wooden deck outside of the V Zone. 4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? _Yes X No; if yes,describe the volume of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: 5. a discharge to an Outstanding Resource Water(ORW)or an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)?._Yes X No 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? _Yes X No; if yes, identify the area (in sf): 7. located in buffer zones? _Yes X No; if yes, how much (in sf) E. Will the project: 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? X Yes_No 2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state law? Yes X-No; if yes, what is the area(sf)? III.Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site contain waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands)thaf are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? _Yes X No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 License or Permit affecting the project site? _Yes X No; if yes, list the date and license or - permit number and provide a copy of the historic map used to determine extent of filled tidelands: B. Does the project require anew or modified license or permit under M.G.L.c.91?_Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water-dependent use? Current _ Change Total If yes, how many square feet of solid fill or pile-supported structures (in sf)? C. For non-water-dependent use projects, indicate the following: Area of filled tidelands on the site: None Area of filled tidelands covered by buildings: None For portions of site on filled tidelands, list ground floor uses and area of each use: None - 13- Does the project include new non-water-dependent uses located over flowed tidelands? Yes_No I Height of building on filled tidelands: N/A Also show the following on a site plan: Mean High Water, Mean Low Water, Water- dependent Use Zone, location of uses within buildings on tidelands, and interior and exterior areas and facilities dedicated for public use, and historic high and historic low water marks. D. Is the project located on landlocked tidelands? _Yes X No; if yes, describe the project's impact on the public's right to access, use and enjoy jurisdictional tidelands and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: E. Is the project located in an area where low groundwater levels have been identified by a municipality or by a state or federal agency as a threat to building foundations?_Yes X No; if yes, describe the project's impact on groundwater levels and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: F. Is the project non-water-dependent and located on landlocked tidelands or waterways or tidelands subject to the Waterways Act and subject to a mandatory EIR? Yes X No (NOTE. If yes, then the project will be subject to Public Benefit Review and Determination.) G. Does the project include dredging?_Yes X No; if yes, answer the following questions: What type of dredging? Improvement_Maintenance_Both What is the proposed dredge volume, in cubic yards (cys) What is the proposed dredge footprint length (ft)_width (ft) depth (ft); Will dredging impact the following resource areas? Intertidal Yes_ No_; if yes,_sq ft Outstanding Resource Waters Yes_ No if yes, _sq ft Other resource area (i.e. shellfish beds, eel grass beds) Yes_ No_; if yes_sq ft If yes to any of the above, have you evaluated appropriate and practicable steps to: 1)avoidance; 2) if avoidance is not possible, minimization; 3) if either avoidance or minimize is not possible, mitigation? If no to any of the above, what information or documentation was used to support this determination? Provide a comprehensive analysis of practicable alternatives for improvement dredging in accordance with 314 CMR 9.07(1)(b). Physical and chemical data of the sediment shall be included in the comprehensive analysis. Sediment Characterization Existing gradation analysis results? _Yes No: if yes, provide results. Existing chemical results for parameters listed in 314 CMR 9.07(2)(b)6?_Yes No; if yes, provide results. Do you have sufficient information to evaluate feasibility of the following management options for dredged sediment? If yes, check the appropriate option. Beach Nourishment_ Unconfined Ocean Disposal Confined Disposal: Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD)_ Confined Disposal Facility(CDF)_ Landfill Reuse in accordance with COMM-97-001 _ Shoreline Placement_ Upland Material Reuse In-State landfill disposal Out-of-state landfill disposal (NOTE. This information is required for a 401 Water Quality Certification.) - 14- IV. Consistency: A. Does the project have effects on the coastal resources or uses, and/or is the project located within the Coastal Zone? X Yes _No; if yes, describe these effects and the projects consistency with the policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management:The proiect includes restoration of dune areas within the Coastal Zone of Cape Cod, which will enhance the functions and interests of coastal dunes. This is consistent with the policy of the Office of Coastal Zone Management to protect these important coastal resources B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? _Yes X No; if yes, identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan: - 15- WATER SUPPLY SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply(see 301 CMR 11.03(4))? Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. II. Impacts and Permits . A. Describe, in gallons per day(gpd), the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Municipal or regional water supply Withdrawal from groundwater Withdrawal from surface water Interbasin transfer (NOTE.-Interbasin Transfer approval will be required if the basin and community where the proposed water supply source is located is different from the basin and community where the wastewater from the source will be discharged.) B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project? Yes No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source, has a pumping test been conducted? _Yes No; if yes, attach a map of the drilling sites and a summary of the alternatives considered and the results. D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source(in gallons per day)? Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal? Yes _No; if yes, then how much of an increase (gpd)? E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility, water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total Flow Daily Flow Capacity of water supply well(s)(gpd) Capacity of water treatment plant(gpd) F. If the project involves a new interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? G. Does the project involve: 1. new water service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority or other agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or water district? Yes_No 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? _Yes_No; if yes, how many acres of alteration? 3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? _Yes_No III. Consistency Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources, quality, facilities and services: - 16- WASTEWATER SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater(see 301 CMR 11.03(5))? Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation --Traffic Generation Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. IL Impacts and Permits A. Describe the volume(in gallons per day)and type of disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00 for septic systems or 314 CMR 7.00 for sewer systems): Existing Change Total Discharge of sanitary wastewater Discharge of industrial wastewater TOTAL Existing Change Total Discharge to groundwater Discharge to outstanding resource water Discharge to surface water Discharge to municipal or regional wastewater . facility TOTAL B. Is the existing collection system at or near its capacity? _Yes_No; if yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows: C. Is the existing wastewater disposal facility at or near its permitted capacity?—Yes_No; if yes,,then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project's wastewater flows: ' D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _Yes No; if yes, describe as follows: Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total Daily Flow Wastewater treatment plant capacity (in gallons per day) E. If the project requires an interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or new? (NOTE: Interbasin Transfer approval may be needed if the basin and community where wastewater will be discharged is different from the basin and community where the source of water supply is located.) - 17- F. Does the project involve new sewer service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority(MWRA)or other Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? Yes_No G. Is there an existing facility, or is a new facility proposed at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, wastewater reuse (gray water)or other sewage residual materials? _Yes_No; if yes, what is the capacity(tons per day): Existing Change Total Storage Treatment Processing Combustion Disposal H. Describe the water conservation measures to be undertaken by the project, and other wastewater mitigation, such as infiltration and inflow removal. III. Consistency A. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with applicable state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: B. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? Yes No; if yes, indicate the EEA number for the plan and whether the project site is within a sewer service area recommended or approved in that plan: - 18- TRANSPORTATION SECTION (TRAFFIC GENERATION) . I. Thresholds/Permit A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways?_Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. II. Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Number of parking spaces Number of vehicle trips per day ITE Land Use Code(s): B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? Roadway Existinq Change Total , 1. 2. 3. C. If applicable, describe proposed mitigation measures on state-controlled roadways-that the project proponent will implement: D. How will the project implement and/or promote the use of transit, pedestrian and'bicycle facilities and services to provide access to and from the project site? C. Is there a Transportation Management Association (TMA)that provides transportation demand management(TDM)services in the area of the project site? Yes No; if yes, describe if and how will the project will participate in the TMA: D. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation facilities? Yes No; if yes, generally describe: E. If the project will penetrate approach airspace of a nearby airport, has the proponent filed a Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Airspace Review Form (780 CM 111.7)and a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (CFR Title 14 Part 77.13, forms 7460-1 and 7460-2)? III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: I - 19- i TRANSPORTATION SECTION (ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES) I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation facilities? Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. II.Transportation Facility Impacts A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project site: B. Will the project involve any 1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? 2. Cutting of living public shade trees (number)? 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? III. Consistency-- Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan: -20- ENERGY SECTION ' I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy(see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Energy Section below. ll. Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site: ExistingChange Total Capacity of electric generating facility(megawatts) Length of fuel line(in miles) Length of transmission lines (in miles) Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts) B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are: 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right of way?_Yes_No; if yes, please describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III. Consistency Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for , enhancing energy facilities and services: -21 - • AIR QUALITY SECTION I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality(see 301 CMR 11.03(8))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? _Yes X No; if.yes, specify which permit: i C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air Quality Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source(see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)?_Yes_No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons per day)of: Existinq Change Total Particulate matter Carbon monoxide Sulfur dioxide Volatile organic compounds Oxides of nitrogen Lead Any hazardous air pollutant Carbon dioxide B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts: III. Consistency A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality: I 22 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION I. Thresholds/Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste(see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? _Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste?_Yes_No; if yes, what is the volume(in tons per day)of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste?_Yes No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons or gallons per day)of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Recycling Treatment Disposal C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal: D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? Yes No E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts): Ill. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan: 23 .l HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION I. Thresholds/Impacts A. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? _Yes X No., if yes, attach correspondence. For project sites involving lands under water, have you consulted with the Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Resources? N/A Yes X No; if yes, attach correspondence B. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure? Yes_No; if yes, please describe: C. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? _Yes_No; if yes, please describe: D. If you answered "No"to all parts of both questions A, B and C, proceed to the Attachments and Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes"to any part of either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below. II. Impacts Describe and assess the project's impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and archaeological resources: III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources: 24 y CERTIFICATIONS: 1. The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following newspapers in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1): (Name) Barnstable Patriot (Date)August 2, 2013 2. This form has been circulated to Agencies and Persons in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). Yes: see the attached cover letter with the list of all recipients to date Signatures: Dat Signature of Wesponsible Officer Date. Signature of person preparing or Proponent NPC (if different from above) Michael Talbot, MCH, ISA Name (print or type) Name (print or type) Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC Firm/Agency Firm/Agency P.O. Box 187 Street Street Mashpee, MA 02649-0187 Municipality/State/Zip Municipality/State/Zip 5080539-1912 Phone Phone I _ 25 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: l Bureau of Resource Protection -.Wetlands f MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 — Notice of Intent Ll - � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 � Document Transaction BARNSTABLE Impor ` City/Town When A. General Information When filling out forms on the computer,use 1. Project Location (Note: electronic filers will click on button to locate project site): only the tab key to move your 265 OCEAN VIEW AVENUE BARNSTABLE. 02635 cursor-do not use the return a.Street Address b.City/Town c.Zip Code key. Latitude and Longitude: 41.60668N 70.43715W d.Latitude e.Longitude 033 020 f.Assessors Map/Plat Number g.Parcel/Lot Number 2 mow-- I . Applicant: DAVID J. DER HAGOPIAN, Trustee a. First Name b.Last Name Note: DAVID J. DER HAGOPIAN TRUST Before c.Organization completing this form consult 1900 SUMMIT TOWER BOULEVARD-SUITE 900 your local d.Street Address Conservation ORLANDO FL 32810 Commission e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code regarding any municipal bylaw 407-808-3890 djd@quanahcap.com or ordinance. h.Phone Number i. Fax Number j.Email Address 3. Property owner(required if different from applicant): ❑ Check if more than one owner a.First Name b.Last Name c.Organization d.Street Address e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code h.Phone Number i. Fax Number j.Email address 4. Representative(if any): MICHAEL TALBOT, MCH, ISA, ASCA a.First Name b.Last Name ENVIRONMENTAL LANDSCAPE CONSULTANTS, LLC c.Company P.O. BOX 187 d.Street Address MASHPEE MA 02649-0187 e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code " 508-539-1912 508-539-8865 info@talbotecolandcare.com h.Phone Number i. Fax Number j.Email address . 5. Total WPA Fee Paid (from N01 Wetiand Fee Transmittal Form): $500.00 $237.50 $262.50 I a.Total Fee Paid b.State Fee Paid c.Cityrrown Fee Paid wpaform3.doc•rev. 1/3/2013 Page 1 of 8 eo by Mass°EP: Massachusetts Department of Environmental ProtectionPr°vid Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 — Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Transaction NumberggRNSTABLE City/Town A. General Information (continued) 6. General Project Description: REMOVE EXISTING, ROTTING STAIRS AND DECK AND REPLACE WITH A NEW SET OF STAIRS AND DECK WITH A FOUR FOOT WIDE PATH TO WATER. REMOVE INVASIVE SPECIES AND RE-VEGETATE WITH NATIVE PLANTS; PLANT NATIVE SPECIES IN SPARSE AREAS AND WHERE THE EXISTING STEPS AND DECK HAVE BEEN REMOVED. 7a. Project Type Checklist: 1. ® Single Family Home 2. ❑ Residential Subdivision 3. ❑ Limited Project Driveway Crossing 4. ❑ Commercial/Industrial 5. ❑ Dock/Pier 6. - ❑ Utilities 7. ❑ Coastal Engineering Structure 8. ❑ Agriculture (e.g., cranberries, forestry) 9. ❑ Transportation 10. ❑ Other 7b. Is any portion of the proposed activity eligible to be treated as a limited project subject to 310 CMR 10.24(coastal)or 310 CMR 10.53(inland)? 1. ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe which limited project applies to this project: 2.Limited Project 8. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: BARNSTABLE 187881 L.C. 6713-B a.County b.Certificate#(if registered land) 37 65 c.Book d.Page Number B. Buffer Zone & Resource Area Impacts (temporary & permanent) 1. ❑ Buffer Zone Only—Check if the project is located only in the Buffer Zone of a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, Inland Bank, or Coastal Resource Area. 2. ❑ Inland Resource Areas (see 310 CMR 10.54-10.58; if not applicable, go to Section B.3, Coastal Resource Areas). Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and any supporting documentation describing how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Resource Area S_ize of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if any) For all projects affecting other Resource Areas, a. El Bank 1.linear feet 2.linear feet please attach a b. ❑ Bordering Vegetated narrative explaining how Wetland 1.square feet 2.square feet the resource area was c. ❑ Land Under 1.square feet 2.square feet delineated. Waterbodies and Waterways 3.cubic yards dredged wpaform3.doc•rev. 1/3/2013 Page 2 of 8 Massachusetts Department of:Environmental Protection Provlded by WssDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 — Notice of Intent Llt F Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Ac t Document Transaction Number M.G.L. c. 131, §40 BARNSTABLE City/Town B. Buffer Zone & Resource Area Impacts (temporary & permanent) (cont'd) Resource Area Size of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if any d. ❑ Bordering Land Subject to Flooding 1.square feet 2.square feet 3.cubic feet of flood storage lost 4.cubic feet replaced e. ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding 1.square feet 2.cubic feet of flood storage lost 3.cubic feet replaced f. ❑ Riverfront Area 1.Name of Waterway(if available) 2.Width of Riverfront Area(check one): ❑ 25 ft. - Designated Densely Developed Areas only ❑ 100 ft. - New agricultural projects only ❑ 200 ft. -All other projects 3.Total area of Riverfront Area on the site of the proposed project: square feet 4. Proposed alteration of the Riverfront Area: a.total square feet b.square feet within 100 ft. c.square feet between 100 ft.and 200 ft. 5. Has an alternatives analysis been done and is it attached to this NOI? " ❑ Yes❑ 'No 6.Was the lot where the activity is proposed created prior to August 1, 1996? ❑ Yes❑ No 3. ® Coastal Resource Areas: (See 310 CMR 10.25-10.35) Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and supporting documentation describing how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Online Users: Include your Resource Area Size of Proposed Alteration . Proposed Replacement(if any) document transaction a. ❑ Designated Port Areas, number Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below (provided on your receipt page) b. ❑ Land Under the Ocean square feet 1.s with all q supplementary information you 2.cubic yards dredged submit to the Department. c. ❑ Barrier Beach Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes below d. ❑ Coastal Beaches 1.square feet 2.cubic yards beach nourishment 10,650 e. ® Coastal Dunes 1.square feet 2.cubic yards dune nourishment wpaform3.doc•rev. 1/3/2013 Page 3 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ProvdedbyMassDEP__- Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 — Notice of Intent fi Document Transaction Numbed Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 —gARNSTABLE !� City/Town B. Buffer Zone & Resource Area Impacts (temporary & permanent) (cont'd) Size of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if any f. ® Coastal Banks 170 1.linear feet g. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores 1.square feet h.❑ Salt Marshes 1.square feet 2.sq ft restoration,rehab.,creation i. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds 1.square feet 2.cubic yards dredged j. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish 1.square feet k. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above 1.cubic yards dredged I. ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 1.square feet 4. ❑ Restoration/Enhancement If the project is for the purpose of restoring or enhancing a wetland resource area in addition to the square footage that has been entered in Section B.2.b or B.3.h above, please enter the additional amount here. a.square feet of BVW b:square feet of Salt Marsh 5. ❑ Project Involves Stream Crossings a.number of new stream crossings b.number of replacement stream crossings C. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements Streamlined Massachusetts Endangered Species Act/Wetlands Protection Act Review 1. Is any portion of the proposed project located in Estimated Habitat of Rare Wildlife as indicated on the most recent Estimated Habitat Map of State-Listed Rare Wetland Wildlife published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)?To view habitat maps, see the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas or go to http://www.mass.qov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/requlatory review/priority habitat/online viewer.htm. a. ❑ Yes ® No If yes, include proof of mailing or hand delivery of NOI to: Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Division of Fisheries and Wildlife 100 Hartwell Street,Suite 230 b.Date of map West Boylston, MA 01583 wpaform3.doc•rev. 1/3/2013 Page 4 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Pr°vided by MassDEP. Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent - ' Document Transaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c..131, §40 `- -- -- BARNSTABLE City/Town C. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements (cont'd) If yes, the project is also subject to Massachusetts Endangered Species Act(MESA)review(321 CMR 10.18). To qualify for a streamlined, 30-day, MESA/Wetlands Protection Act review, please complete Section C.1.C, and include requested materials with this Notice of Intent(NOI); OR complete Section C.1.d, if applicable. If MESA supplemental information is not included with the NOI, by completing Section 1 of this form, the NHESP will require a separate MESA filing which may take up to 90 days to review(unless noted exceptions in Section 2 apply, see below). 1. c. Submit Supplemental,Information for Endangered Species Review* 1. ❑ Percentage/acreage of property to be altered: (a)within wetland Resource Area percentage/acreage (b)outside Resource Area percentage/acreage 2. ❑ Assessor's Map or right-of-way plan of site 3. ❑ Project plans for entire project site, including wetland resource areas and areas outside of wetlands jurisdiction, showing existing and proposed conditions, existing and proposed tree/vegetation clearing line, and clearly demarcated limits of work**" (a)❑ Project description (including description of impacts outside of wetland resource area &, buffer zone) (b)❑ Photographs representative of the site (c)❑ MESA'filing fee(fee information available at: http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/regulatory review/mesa/mesa fee schedule htm). Make check payable to"Commonwealth of Massachusetts- NHESP" and mail to NHESP at above address Projects altering 10 or more acres of land, also submit: (d)❑ Vegetation cover type map of site (e)❑ Project plans showing Priority& Estimated Habitat boundaries d. OR Check One of the Following 1.❑ Project is exempt from MESA review. Attach applicant letter indicating which MESA exemption applies. (See 321 CMR 10.14, http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/requlatory review/mesa/mesa exemptions htm; the NOI must still be sent to NHESP if the project is within estimated habitat pursuant to 310 CMR 10.37 and 10.59.) 2.❑ Separate MESA review ongoing. a. NHESP Tracking# b.Date submitted to NHESP Some projects not in Estimated Habitat may be located in Priority Habitat,and require NHESP review(see http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/nhesp.htm, regulatory review tab). Priority Habitat includes habitat for state-listed plants and strictly upland species not protected by the Wetlands Protection Act. ** MESA projects may not be segmented(321 CMR 10.16).The applicant must disclose full development plans even if such plans are not required as part of the Notice of Intent process. wpaform3.doc-rev. 1/3/2013 Page 5 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: - Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 — Notice of Intent Document Transaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 BARNSTAB LE City/Town C. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements (cont'd) 3.❑ Separate MESA review completed. Include copy of NHESP"no Take" determination or valid Conservation & Management Permit with approved plan. 2. For coastal projects only, is any portion of the proposed project located below the mean high water line or in a fish run? a. ❑ Not applicable—project is in inland resource area only b.❑ Yes ® No If yes, include proof of mailing or hand delivery of NOl to either: South Shore-Cohasset to Rhode North Shore-Hull to New Hampshire: Island, and the Cape&Islands: Division of Marine Fisheries- Division of Marine Fisheries- Southeast Marine Fisheries Station North Shore Office Attn: Environmental Reviewer Attn: Environmental Reviewer 1.213 Purchase Street—3rd Floor 30 Emerson Avenue New Bedford, MA 02740-6694 Gloucester, MA 01930 Also if yes, the project may require a Chapter 91 license. For coastal towns in the Northeast Region, please contact MassDEP's Boston Office. For coastal towns in the Southeast Region, please contact MassDEP's Southeast Regional Office. 3. Is any portion of the proposed project within an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)? Online Users: a. ❑ Yes ® No If yes, provide name of ACEC(see instructions to WPA Form 3 or MassDEP Include your Website for ACEC locations). Note: electronic filers click on Website. document transaction b.ACEC number (provided on your 4. Is any portion of the proposed project within an area designated as an Outstanding Resource Water receipt page) (ORW)as designated in the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00? with all supplementary a. ❑ Yes ® No information you submit to the 5. Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Restriction Order under the Inland Wetlands Department. Restriction Act(M.G.L. c. 131, §40A)or the Coastal Wetlands Restriction Act(M.G.L. c. 130, § 105)? a. ❑ Yes ® No 6. Is this project subject to provisions of the MassDEP Stormwater Management Standards? a. ❑ Yes. Attach a copy of the Stormwater Report as required by the Stormwater Management Standards per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(k)-(q)and check if: 1.❑ Applying for Low Impact Development(LID)site design credits(as described in Stormwater Management Handbook Vol. 2, Chapter 3) 2.❑ A portion of the site constitutes redevelopment 3.❑ Proprietary BMPs are included,in the Stormwater Management System. b.® No. Check why the project is exempt: 1.® Single-family house wpaform3.doc•rev. 1/3/2013 Page 6 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number � WPA Form 3 — Notice of Intent Ll Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Document Transaction Number BARNS TABLE City/Town C. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements (cont'd) 2.❑ Emergency road repair 3.❑ Small Residential Subdivision (less than or equal to 4 single-family houses or less than or equal to 4 units in multi-family housing project)with no discharge to Critical Areas. D. Additional Information Applicants must include the following with this Notice of Intent(NOI). See instructions for details. Online Users: Attach the document transaction number(provided on your receipt page)for any of the following information you submit to the Department. 1. 0 USGS or other map of the area(along with a narrative description, if necessary)containing sufficient information for the Conservation Commission and the Department to locate the site. (Electronic filers may omit this item.) 2. ® Plans identifying the location of proposed activities(including activities proposed to serve as a Bordering Vegetated Wetland [BVW] replication area or other mitigating measure) relative to the boundaries of each affected resource area. 3. ® Identify the method for BVW and other resource area boundary delineations (MassDEP BVW Field Data Form(s), Determination of Applicability, Order of Resource Area Delineation, etc.); and attach documentation of the methodology. 4. 0 List the titles and dates for all plans and other materials submitted with this NOI. DER HAGOPIAN RESIDENCE- EXISTING CONDITIONS a.Plan Title BSC GROUP CRAIG A. FIELD, PLS b. Prepared By c.Signed and Stamped by 1/23/2013 1 INCH = 20 FEET d. Final Revision Date 'e.Scale CONSERVATION LANDSCAPE PLAN 2/13/2013; rev 4/9/13 f.Additional Plan or Document Title g.Date 5. ❑ If there is more than one property owner, please attach a list of these property owners not listed on this form. s.❑ Attach proof of mailing for Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, if needed. 7. ❑ Attach proof of mailing for Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, if needed. 8. ® Attach NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form 9. ❑ -'Attach Stormwater Report, if needed. wpaform3.doc•rev. 102013 Page 7 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provdid'by MassDEP: - Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent Ll ber Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 L-Locn-eatT�ans-actlonNumBARNSTABLE City/Town E. Fees 1. ❑ Fee Exempt: No filing fee shall be assessed for projects of any city, town, county, or district of the Commonwealth, federally recognized Indian tribe housing authority, municipal housing authority, or the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Applicants must submit the following information (in addition to pages 1 and 2 of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form)to confirm fee payment: 1178 2/18/2013 2. Municipal Check Number 3.Check date 1177 2/18/2013 4.State Check Number 5.Check date Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC 6. Payor name on check:First Name 7.Payor name on check:Last Name F. Signatures and Submittal Requirements I hereby certify under the penalties of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans, documents, and supporting data are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that ' the Conservation Commission will place notification of this Notice in a local newspaper at the expense of the applicant in accordance with the wetlands regulations, 310 CMR 10.05(5)(a). I further certify under penalties of perjury that all abutters were notified of this application, pursuant to the requirements of M.G.L. c. 131, § 40. Notice must be made by Certificate of Mailing or in writing by hand delivery or certified mail (return receipt requested)to all abutters within 100 feet of the property line of the project location. 1.Signature of Applicant 2.Date 3.Signature of Property Owner(if different) 4. Date W 9/2013 5.Signature of Representative(if any) 6.Date For Conservation Commission: Two copies of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), including supporting plans and documents, two copies of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form, and the city/town fee payment,to the Conservation Commission by certified mail or hand delivery. For MassDEP: One copy of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), including supporting plans and documents, one copy of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form, and a copy of the state fee payment to the MassDEP Regional Office(see Instructions) by certified mail or hand delivery. Other: If the applicant has checked the"yes" box in any part of Section C, Item 3, above, refer to that section and the Instructions for additional submittal requirements. The original and copies must be sent simultaneously. Failure by the applicant to send copies in a timely manner may result in dismissal of the Notice of Intent. wpaform3.doc•rev. 1/3/2013 Page 8 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c: 131, §40 Important:When A. Applicant Information filling out forms on the computer, 1. Location of Project: use only the tab key to move your 265 OCEAN VIEW AVENUE BARNSTABLE cursor-do not a.Street Address b.City/Town use the return key. #1177 for$42.50 and #1182 for$195.00 $237.50 c.Check number d.Fee amount 2. Applicant Mailing Address: DAVID J. DER HAGOPIAN, Trustee a. First Name b.Last Name DAVID J. DER HAGOPIAN TRUST c.Organization 1900 SUMMIT TOWER BLVD., SUITE 900 d.Mailing Address ORLANDO FL 32810 e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code 407-808-3890 djd@quanahcap.com h.Phone Number i. Fax Number j.Email Address 3. Property Owner(if different): a.First Name b. Last Name c.Organization d.Mailing Address e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code h.Phone Number i. Fax Number j.Email Address To calculate B. Fees filing fees,refer to the category fee list and Fee should be calculated using the following process &worksheet. Please see Instructions before examples in the filling out worksheet instructions for filling out WPA Step 1/Type of Activity: Describe each type of activity that will occur in wetland resource area and buffer zone. Form 3(Notice of Intent). Step 2/Number of Activities: Identify the number of each type of activity. Step 3/Individual Activity Fee: Identify each activity fee from the six project categories listed in the instructions. Step 4/Subtotal Activity Fee: Multiply the number of activities(identified in Step 2)times the fee per category (identified in Step 3)to reach a subtotal fee amount. Note: If any of these activities are in a Riverfront Area in addition to another Resource Area or the Buffer Zone,the fee per activity should be multiplied by 1.5 and then added to the subtotal amount. Step 51Total Project Fee: Determine the total project fee by adding the subtotal amounts from Step 4. Step 6/Fee Payments:To calculate the state share of the fee,divide the total fee in half and subtract$12.50.To calculate the city/town share of the fee,divide the total fee in half and add$12.50. B. Fees (continued) noifeetf.doc•Wedand Fee Transmittal Form•rev.10/17/11 Page 1 of 2 f A L7- 11 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Step 1/Type of Activity Step 2/Number Step Step 4/Subtotal Activity of Activities 3/Individual Fee Activity Fee Category 2;j.) any other activity One $500.00 500.00 Step 5/Total Project Fee: 500.00 Step 6/Fee Payments: Total Project Fee: $5 To F Total a.Total Fee from Step 5 State share of filing Fee: $237.50 b. 1/2 Total Fee less$12.50 City/Town share.of filling Fee: $262.50 c. 1/2 Total Fee plus$12.50 C. Submittal Requirements a.) Complete pages 1 and 2 and send with a check or money order for the state share of the fee, payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Department of Environmental Protection Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 b.) To the Conservation Commission: Send the Notice of Intent or Abbreviated Notice of Intent;a copy of this form;and the city/town fee payment. To MassDEP Regional Office(see Instructions):Send a copy of the Notice of Intent or Abbreviated Notice of Intent;a copy of this form;and a copy of the state fee payment.(E-filers of Notices of Intent may submit these electronically.) noifeetf.doc•Wetland Fee Transmittal Form•rev.10/17/11 Page 2 of 2 r ""ENVIRONMENTAL . LANDSCAPE CONSULTANTS,A Certified Consulting Arborists,Horticulturists and Conservation Designers Natural Landscape Design and Tree,Shrub and Lawn Care Services Consultation,Education,Permitting,Installation and Management Notice of Intent Mass DEP File No. SE 003 - 5072 Filing under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act,MGL Chapter 131,Section 40 and Chapter 237, Wetlands Protection Ordinance of the Code of the Town of Barnstable. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 265 Ocean View Avenue Cotuit, Massachusetts Prepared for r DAVID J. DER HAGOPIAN,Trustee DAVID J. DER HAGOPIAN TRUST 1900 SUMMIT TOWER BLVD., SUITE 900 ORLANDO,FL 32810 Prepared by: MICHAEL TALBOT,MCH, ISA,ASCA Principal Conservation Consultant February 18,2013 Revised May 1,2013 Post Office Box 187 www.TalbotEcoLandCare.com Office: 508-539-1912 Mashpee, MA 02649 e-mail: info@michael-talbot.com Fax: 508-539-8865 Der Hagopian Trust Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS ATTACHMENT A - WPA FORM 3 ATTACHMENT B - PROJECT NARRATIVE 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................. B-1 2.0 Project Site and USGS Locus Map.................................o................... ....... B-1 2.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................ B-2 2.2 Regulated Resource Areas ..................................................................................... B-6 2.3 Estimated Habitat and-Protected Species............................................:.................. B-6 3.0 Proposed Project .......:....................... . B-6 ...................................................... 3.1 Mitigation and Restoration Plan ............................................................................ B-8 3.2 Project Schedule and Ongoing Management Plan..............:.................................... B-9 4.0 Performance Standards ............................................................................ B-9 4.1 Coastal Beach ................. . B-9 ....................................................................................... 4.2 Coastal Dune ........................................................................................................ B-10 4.3 Coastal Bank.....................................................................................................:.. B-12 5.0 Summary and Conclusion........................................................................ B-13 ATTACHMENT C - ABUTTER NOTIFICATION INFORMATION...............C-1 ATTACHMENT D - PROJECT PLANS; ATTACHED SEPARATELY May 1, 2013 L Der Hagopian Trust Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC ATTACHMENT A ` WPA Form 3 May 1, 2013 Der Hagopian Trust Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC ATTACHMENT B PROJECT NARRATIVE May 1, 2013 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC ATTACHMENT 6 - PROJECT NARRATIVE 1.0 Introduction Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC (ELC) has revised the narrative dated February 18, 2013 and presented to the Barnstable Conservation Commission on March 19, 2013 for the Notice of Intent (NOI) filing on behalf of David Der Hagopian, Trustee, of the David J. Der Hagopian Trust("the owner.") The revisions are based on our revised plan and the conditions agreed to with the Barnstable Conservation Commission at our hearing of April 30, 2013. It is also based on a request by the abutter's attorney,Mr. George Hailer,to modify the description of the neighboring property. ELC filed this Notice of Intent application on behalf of Mr. Hagopian for enhancements to his property at 265 Ocean View Avenue in Cotuit. The owner requested permission to replace the existing steep, hazardous, wooden steps on this property with a new set of wooden stairs with several landings to reduce the hazard of the existing continuous, steep set of stairs. The owner also requested permission to replace the existing, rotting deck (approximately eight feet by twelve feet in size)with a new deck of approximately equal size. As agreed by the Conservation Commission,when they closed the hearing and agreed to issue an Order of Conditions (OOC), the new stairs and deck will be moved off of the property line where the existing stairs and deck are now located. Please refer to the revised plan, titled "Conservation Landscape.Plan" and revised on April 9,2013 ("the Plan",)that will now be the plan of record. The application was filed jointly with the Department of Environmental Protection, pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (MWPA, M.G.L. Chapter 131, Section 40,) and the Town of Barnstable (hereinafter referred to as the "Town") pursuant to Chapter 237, Wetlands Protection Ordinance of the Code of the Town of Barnstable (hereinafter referred to as the"Town Wetlands Protection Ordinance".) 2.0 Project Site and USGS Locus Map The project site is approximately 0.36 acres of undeveloped land on the east (seaward) side of Ocean View Avenue just north of The Loop Beach on Cotuit Bay. The location of the site is noted on the USGS Locus Map on the next page. The existing conditions on this site, including regulated resource areas,are described below. May 1, 2013 Page 13-1 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC 1 1 1 i i f i t t 070.26'30.00{W l t ( I 670 26 A.00"w 070.25'30.00 VJ pp —; }�..Y J'�j�. .a �.. •��t'r�� ,••..a/`�' s'�" + ' 1r3@rxsCh • i :.1 Pt J � — .• 'P ."s, _ - . "' �' may► ' "Y"' ", - �� a sits+• ++ � .i .� � •4.y. '� y.. ` I . w i r Ti kl • x. • ,° Ills gi �..# �'� � �_. � �� w • f� ♦ • .. •- .tJ';"-.. ta r 4 � s ♦ � ' n _ f • ` AU 0 co Wre 1s•w ,.•.. 1 1 I ► 1 r I 070.26'�,00'kV `070'26 Q�0"+w ( t l I l 1 + 070'25'�0 Name:COTUIT Location: 041.36'23.7' N 070.26'10.3" W Date:2/14/2013 Caption:265 Ocean View Avenue Scale.I inch equals 1000 feet Coluit,MA Y 2.1 Existing Conditions A section of the street edge of the property is shown in the photo at the top of the next page. A portion of the street edge is adjacent to the diagonal parking for beachgoers seen in the photo. The edge of woody vegetation is also approximately the top of the coastal bank May 1, 2013 Page B-2 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC (TOCB,) which leaves a very small area of buffer zone that is maintained r by the owner (and by previous owners . for many years) to u s prevent vegetation x encroachment on _ the parking. The �, vegetation is dominated by invasive species, m includingblack locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) trees seen on the left side of the photograph, as well as Oriental bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculatus),multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), and shrub honeysuckles (Lonicera morrowii; possibly L, tartarica as well.) The photo to the left shows i a close-up view of the hazardous steps from a point just seaward of the wooden gate shown in the previous photo. These r� - . .:" 4 • . h"`" �' stairs were built straight down the bank and the poor condition of the handrails is particularly s _ evident. The red arrow shows a s • r phone cable installed, we believe, by Town staff to provide phone service to the beach building managed by the Town on The Loop Beach. The line runs through Mr. Der Hagopian's property along a section of cut vegetation further down the bank. May 1, 2013 Page B-3 i Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC The existing stairs lead to an existing deck, as is visible in the photo to the right. The { deck was also constructed of wood, which is now rotting with broken deck boards where people have fallen .� a through. The deck and stairs are also over the critical root ft. zone of a large, native white ' oak (Quercus alba) seen in the center of the photo. t a s ' Also visible in the photo is the existing path to the beach _ through the secondary dune, . which consists almost entirely � of invasive species. Invasive species seen in this photo ti:, 4W i include beach rose (Rosa rugosa), multiflora rose,shrub honeysuckle, Japanese honeysuckle (L. japonica) Oriental bittersweet and black locust. Native plants 4 .y Y, include beach plum (Prunus ' maritima), Virginia rose (Rosa k -°' •, f - vir iniana) and black cherry, (Prunus serotina.) Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)` saplings, one of which can be i seen in the photo above, were 3t-,fit- ` •I My _. 6 � planted here in the past as o mitigation for a past violation E by the previous owner. The photo to the left shows a more extended view. of the u; t secondary dune and the edge t . }• y �'(. f• of the coastal bank. Along - � - with the invasive species May 1, 2013 Page BA Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC discussed above, this dune has been invaded by black locust trees, many of which have 5 invasive and aggressive vines growing on them. `$ t There is an area of sandplain heathland at the ' N; southern end of the secondary coastal dune, as seen in the photo to the left. The arrow shows .v heathland vegetation, specifically beach heather (Hudsonia tomentosa.) This area is relatively undisturbed but is under threat from the rapid encroachment of both M-0 black locust root suckers—all of the upright stems visible in the foreground are black locust—and by Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius,) which is also observed in significant and growing numbers. We observed 120 black locust root suckers and samplings on the coastal dunes and interdunal areas alone, which are adversely affecting the dune's ability to carry out its function of providing sediment down coast and as wildlife habitat. The black locust is also threatening The Loop Beach adjacent to this property. The photo to the right shows a portion of the dense vegetation on the 4 coastal bank. Along with all of the invasive species listed above, there are Norway t, maples (Acer platanoides) on the southwest portion of the property. Also visible in the photo is ' - aggressive growth of greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia) adversely affecting native red cedars (Juniperus virginiana), which is an May 1, 2013 Page B-5 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC important native tree species found on the coastal bank, along with native oaks (Quercus spp.) and black cherry also visible in the photo. Several specimens of serviceberry (Amelanchier sp.) were observed on the coastal bank. 2.2 Regulated Resource Areas' - All resource areas within the project site have been identified and have been marked. The top of the coastal bank is staked, as is the landward edge of a secondary coastal dune. This secondary dune is dominated by invasive species. There is a primary coastal dune dominated by American beachgrass (Ammophila breviligulata), but including other species—principally the invasive species of black locust and Scotch broom. Seaward of the coastal dune is a coastal beach where no work is proposed. The coastal dune was delineated by the staff of ELC. This delineation was based on vegetation and soil coring of the sediment in numerous locations to determine where a significant depth of unconsolidated sediment in the form of a mound or ridge was located. These soil corings allowed us to determine the edge of coastal dune. Our conclusion is that there is both a primary and a secondary dune. No structures will be built on the coastal dunes. 2.3 Estimated Habitat and Protected Species The site is not located within an area that has been mapped by the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program and Endangered Species Program as"Estimated Habitat of Rare Wetlands Wildlife",nor is it located within"Priority Habitat". 3.0 Proposed Project s One of two principal goals for the proposed project is to replace the existing stairs, deck" { and path to water with a new set of four foot wide stairs leading to a new deck with a four foot wide path to water. The design of the new steps and deck simply replaces the existing steps and deck with a new set of stairs and a new deck of approximately equal size. Refer to the revised Plan included with this filing for more details. These improvements include: • Construction of the new structures with ACQ treated lumber and recycled materials to extend their longevity. . • Replacement of the existing steep stairs, which are dug in and perpendicular to the contours of the relatively steep bank; this poses•a risk of erosion and sedimentation. The new stairs will be constructed with a landing that moves the remaining stairs. over approximately four feet. This helps minimizes any risk of erosion. • The new stairs and deck will be constructed with wood posts set directly in narrow, hand dug holes to minimize soil disturbance. A i • All bare areas will be revegetated with native species, as is described on the Plan. May 1, 2013 Page B-6 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC • The path to water will only be altered slightly to direct foot traffic'to the new stairs. The short section of the existing path to the existing stairs that will'no longer be used will be revegetated with native dune species. The second goal of this project is to enhance the wildlife habitat value of a portion of the coastal bank and the coastal dunes through the phased eradication of invasive species and revegetation with appropriate, native plant species. The ultimate goal is restoration of a native primary and secondary dune habitat, including plantings of scrub oak (Quercus illicifolia) where appropriate to create a scrub oak habitat area. This restoration work will significantly enhance biodiversity and wildlife habitat value on this property. The project also includes an ongoing management plan to ensure the successful eradication of invasive species and revegetation with native species. Eradication of invasive exotic species within the project area shall be carried out using a range of management tools developed by organizations, such as the Nature Conservancy, and approved by the Barnstable Conservation Commissions for other projects. These techniques include: • Mechanical removal of invasive plants is the first option for invasive plant removal to be used wherever possible, and wherever it would be effective. Garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) observed on the coastal bank and the edge of the dunes will be hand pulled. The invasive roses and other species invading the dunes will generally be dug and eradicated using hand digging and a very low-impact, walk-behind, rubber-tracked skid steer that is so fight weight that it displaces only the weight of an adult male walking. Sediment on the roots will be shaken off and left on site. ELC has successfully used this tool to eradicate invasive shrub species on other projects, including successful dune restoration projects on Popponesset Beach and in Hyannisport and the work completed at 262 Ocean View Avenue last year—all done with no adverse impact on soils or the site. Access would be primarily from the street, although there may be a need for some access from the coastal beach immediately adjacent to the dunes through Loop Beach, which is the only impact that this project will have on any portion of the coastal beach. The equipment is only three feet in width. All debris will be immediately removed and disposed off- site at an approved recycling facility. • Basal bark and cut stump treatment may be more appropriate where the plants to be eradicated are too large to be hand dug, are in the vicinity of native species to be preserved, or where mechanical removal could disrupt the stability of the coastal bank or coastal dune. Once cut and the canopy removed, the remaining stump is immediately swiped with a 40% solution of a wetland approved formulation of glyphosate or a 25% formulation of triclopyr. This methodology significantly reduces the ability of the invasive plant to re-sprout. Triclopyr is selective to May 1, 2013 Page B-7 I Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC broadleaf plants only; its use protects the viability of adjacent grasses, including American beachgrass. • Foliar treatment with a wetland approved, low toxic formulation of triclopyr that treats broadleaf invasive species but does not adversely affect native grasses plants may be appropriate in a few situations, such as for small, isolated plants or vines, such as Japanese honeysuckle, or sprouts that survive the cut stump treatment. It may also be done in conjunction with other eradication methods to enhance success. Shields and other devices to avoid drift on native plants will be used whenever and wherever appropriate. As invasive species are managed, restoration continues with revegetation of any disturbed areas, including the areas where the existing deck and stairway are to be removed. Revegetation will also be done in other bare areas, except within presently open areas of sandplain heathland. The proposed project also includes planting of adapted native grasses, sedges and smaller woody groundcover plants beneath the new stairs, where possible and appropriate. The first priorities for eradication of invasive species and revegetation are: • Invasive plants within the proposed footprint of the stairs and deck and in the area identified on the Plan as the portion of the bank adjacent to the stairs and deck approved for invasive species eradication and revegetation. • The coastal dunes and interdunal areas • Along the top of the coastal bank in the area shown in the photo at the top of page . B-3. This area, as identified on the Plan, will be transformed to a coastal grassland habitat, which will add to similar habitat established on Mr. Der Hagopian's property at 262 Ocean View Avenue. It is also an attractive habitat for beachgoers' and residents. • Removal of invasive vines, such as Oriental bittersweet, and plant growth, such as dense growth of greenbrier (Smilax spp.), adversely affecting existing native trees throughout the coastal bank area. This provision was accepted by the Conservation Commission as part of their approval of this project on April 30, 2013. 3.1 Mitigation and Restoration Plan Our proposed restoration of the dunes and the specified areas of the coastal bank will be done over a period of three or more years. Any minor impacts from replacement of the stairs and deck with new stairs and deck will be more than adequately mitigated by this substantial investment by the owner in restoration of these important resource areas. The dune restoration alone is an area of approximately 10,000 square feet. May 1, 2013 Page B-8 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC 3.2 Project Schedule and Ongoing Management Plan The construction of the new stairs and deck, along with removal and mitigation of the existing stairs and deck, are to be completed this spring. All restoration plantings will include incorporation of an organic plant root biostimulant in the planting soil and temporary irrigation to help ensure establishment. Erosion netting and an organic mulch will be applied, where appropriate, to help prevent erosion and to help suppress weeds. Areas where invasive plants are removed will be monitored at least biannually for a minimum of three years. Where needed, newly emerging or re-sprouting invasive plants with be treated and/or hand dug. -New plantings of trees and shrubs will be replaced in that three year period, if any plants die. The ongoing management plan described above provides assurance that the conservation restoration work will be successful and that the site is established as native habitat in the future. As agreed by the Conservation Commission, we will report to the Conservation Department on the status of the invasive species eradication and revegetation on a yearly basis. 4.0 Performance Standards ' We contend that this project`meets all of the applicable Performance Standards, as we discuss below: 4.1 Coastal Beach See the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Wetland Protection Act (WPA); 310 CMR' 10.27; and the Town Wetlands Protection Ordinance. Coastal beaches are important as they provide a sediment source to off shore and downdrift areas, act as buffers to storm waves, and provide wildlife habitat. We contend that this coastal beach is significant to storm damage prevention,flood control and the protection of wildlife habitat, therefore, 310 CMR 10.27(3) through (7) shall apply: (3) "Any project on a coastal beach, except any project permitted under 310 CMR 10.30(3)(a), shall not have an adverse effect by increasing erosion, decreasing the volume or changing theform of any such coastal beach or an adjacent or downdrift coastal beach." For this project the only"impact"on the coastal beach is that there may be minor foot traffic and possibly some use of a very light, rubber—tracked, walk-behind skid steer May 1, 2013 Page B-9 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC (displacing 5 lbJsq. inch—less than the weight of a large human male) on a narrow portion of the beach immediately adjacent to the invasive roses. This is no more impact than beach goers have walling the beach. (4)"Any groin,jetty,solid pier,or other such solid fill structure...." Not applicable to this project;no such structure is planned. (5) "Notwithstanding 310 CMR 10.27(3), beach nourishment with clean sediment of a grain size compatible with that on the existing beach maybe permitted." Not applicable to this project; no beach nourishment is proposed or appropriate for this project. 310 CMR 10.27(6)does not apply,as this is not a tidal flat, (7) "Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.27(3) through 10.27(6), no ` project may be permitted which will have any adverse effect on specified habitat sites or rare vertebrate or invertebrate species, as identified by procedures established under 310 CMR 10.37:' This site is not known to be a habitat site for any rare species. 4.2 Coastal Dune See the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Wetland Protection Act (WPA): 310 CMR 10.28; and the Town of Barnstable Wetlands Protection-Ordinance, Chapter 237. Coastal dunes are important as they provide a sediment source to:off shore and downdrift areas, act as buffers to storm waves, and provide wildlife habitat. Coastal dunes closest to the coastal beach, such as the primary dune in this project, are per se significant to storm damage .prevention and flood control. Coastal dunes are also significant to the protection of wildlife habitat. Therefore,310 CMR 10.28(3)through (6)shall apply: (3)"Any alteration of,or structure on,a coastal dune or within 100 feet of a coastal dune shall not have an adverse effect on the coastal dune by: (a)affecting the ability of waves to remove sand from the dune- (b) disturbing the vegetative cover so as to destabilize the dune; (c)causing any modification of the dune form that would increase the potential for storm or flood damage; (d) interfering with the landward or lateral movement of the dune; (e) causing removal of sand from the dune artificially; or May 1, 2013 Page B=10 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC (f) interfering with mapped or otherwise identified bird nesting habitat We have clearly demonstrated that the activities proposed for this dune area, specifically the eradication of invasive plants that are preventing or adversely affecting the growth of native dune vegetation—thus degrading the biodiversity and overall wildlife habitat value of the site—and the restoration of a native habitat, meets these performance standards. The invasion of black locust also shades the site and prevents movement of sand in major storm events. Our restoration of a native dune plant community will enhance the conservation values of these dune areas significantly. Furthermore, the nearly complete dominance of invasive species on the secondary dune prevents both the accretion of sediment and the removal of that sediment by storm activity. The removal of invasive species and the restoration planting of a native dune and scrub oak plant community will enhance the ability of these areas to carry out the functions noted in the performance standard. When this project is completed the dune will have increased its abilities to form, to have sand removed by wave action, and to help protect upland property from storm and flood damage. (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.28(3), when a building already exists upon a coastal dune...:' This performance standard does not apply to this project. (5):The following projects may be permitted, provided that they adhere to the provisions of310 CMR 10.28(3): (a)pedestrian walkways,designed to minimize the disturbance to the vegetative cover and traditional bird nesting habitat; (b)fencing and other devices designed to increase dune development; and (c) plantings compatible with the natural vegetative cover. This project site does include a pedestrian walkway and plantings compatible with a natural vegetative cover. As noted above,these activities will enhance the function and interests of these dune areas. Maintenance of the native,dune vegetation is included as part of this project. (6) Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.28(3) through (5), no project may be permitted which will have any adverse effect on specified habitat sites of rare vertebrate or invertebrate.species, as identified by procedures established under 310 CMR 10.37. This provision does not apply to this site. May 1, 2013 Page 13-11 T Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC 4.3 Coastal Bank This coastal bank is determined to have some significance to' storm damage prevention and flood control, because this coastal bank is a vertical buffer to storm waters. 310 CMR: 10.30(6) through (8) alone apply, however, as this coastal bank is not a source of sediment to coastal beaches, coastal dunes or barrier beaches. (6) Any project on such a coastal bank or within 100 feet landward of the top of such coastal bank shall have no adverse effects on the stability of the coastal bank. As noted above, the replacement of the existing, steep stairs -and deck with new stairs and deck that do not run along a single path perpendicular to the contours of the bank reduces the potential for erosion, thus enhancing stability. The removal of invasive species—some of which such as shrub honeysuckles, are known to be very shallow P � Y � Y rooted—and their replacement with native shrubs and trees—known to root more extensively—further stabilize the coastal bank. Our project has also provided for erosion control measures during construction and revegetation and only narrow, temporary holes for planting and posts. There will be no adverse impact on the bank's stability,which is well vegetated. _ (7) Bulkheads, revetments, seawalls, groins or other coastal engineering structures may be permitted.... . Not applicable to this project;no such structures are planned: (8) Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.30(3)through (7), no project may be permitted which will have any adverse effect on specified habitat sites of rare vertebrate or invertebrate species.... Not applicable to this project; no such specified habitat sites are known to exist on this site. The Town Regulation (Chapter 704) permits activities such as an access path and restoration activities, including invasive species control and native plantings. It also permits replacement of existing structures. Very extensive mitigation has been provided much more than would be required—for any minor discrepancies, such as moving the stairs and deck off of the property line,where they exist now. May 1, 2013 Page B-12 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC 5.0 Summary and Conclusion Environmental Landscape Consultants,dba Talbot Ecological Land Care,has filed this Notice of Intent on behalf of the David J. Der Hagopian Trust. The applicant wishes to restore a portion of a degraded coastal bank and the coastal dunes and to replace hazardous stairs and a deck with new stairs and a deck on the property at 265 Ocean View Avenue, Cotuit. Based on the discussion of the existing site, the greatly enhanced natural condition of this site that will result from the restoration and on-going management plan, and the demonstration that this project clearly meets all of the relevant performance standards, we respectfully requested that this project be approved, which it now has, and that an Order of Conditions be issued for this project to the applicant through its representative. May 1, 2013 Page 13-13 Der Hagopian Trust Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC ATTACHMENT C ABUTTER.NOTIFICATION INFORMATION i February 18, 2013 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC Abutter Notification Letter: NVIRONMENTAL LANDSCAPE CONSULTANTS,LLC Certified Consulting Arborists,Horticulturists and Conservation Designers Natural Landscape Design and Tree,Shrub and Lawn Care Services ' Consultation,Education,Permitting,Installation and Management NOTICE OF INTENT ABUTTER NOTIFICATION LETTER DATE: February 19, 2013 RE: Upcoming Barnstable Conservation Commission Public Hearing To Whom It May Concern, As an abutter within 100 feet of a proposed project, please be advised that a NOTICE OF - INTENT application has been filed with the Barnstable Conservation Commission. APPLICANT: David J. Der Hagopian Trust PROJECT ADDRESS OR LOCATION: 265 Ocean View Avenue,Cotuit,MA ASSESSOR'S MAP&PARCEL:- Map 33, Parcel 20 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Remove existing,rotting stairs and deck and replace with a new ramp and deck with a four foot wide path to water. Remove invasive species and re- vegetate with native plants;plant native species in sparse areas and where the existing steps. and deck have been removed. APPLICANT'S AGENT: Michael Talbot,MCH,ISA,ASCA Environmental Landscape Consultants,LLC P.O.Box 187,Mashpee,MA 02649 508-539-1912;fax 508-539-8865 info@michael-talbot.com PUBLIC HEARING: Barnstable Town Hall, 367 Main Street, Hyannis Hearing Room-2nd floor DATE: March 19, 201 " TIME: 6:30 P.M. NOTE:Plans and application describing the proposed activity are on file with the Conservation Commission,200 Main Street, Hyannis (508-862-4093) May 1, 2013 Page C-1 Der Hagopian Trust Revised Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC ' Tar.^n at Rerntalile G aptve lntamve ian Sy st�rH Fzbt�er�i�,203 ' Q UM, ' s au i3ti ate C51C63 'v -.--A '�' � i• , ��,� ^• i,`. -� I`a r q-a',: s ,• ,�yEWy s i z _ �� 1 + t V s* •�as,.,i ♦ -�t�+T N+Y..�'« rw's te� kr�r3 r',,yi e�.� o: - C236:M �^� Ns+•. e`.-;: x� ``-3�r:c ,t.r"'�"r..t''.°_`_� Sri :18 y 0 37 Feet 6i frii 43:24T 7�!�1 �e6 a sa.wtta 5�wn as c9N wow, 7 Pat*t= cofts wtioii vita of Ant fid NO) 4w,r�+.r.rz.r�nr.+4Y�M.`P '� ya,rp+.rrre+r��a.g,w�t StkCtdFatael -. t t{� rot of t _rgQN:t�+.+J�Wam cr"Id.'*T5!n�JMretson� /1Lr�s Lai5�'�2.s�r9=CEktyG'r�45ai11"Jn-�30 teal�^2 aa�9�s� �caemm,rr> ia-cm oo'v�rs Itmtas sa,pq w p3rte1 wp6n:vtkawocir i:popn tti - ,ptrWlcrs .I �. en,.�xxa r�s na.r.9t�-e�mea*.awta+vr�ysgfirisa�rt;.+.es�aPcop >,.y .. [3A RN"STAR1 1-TO%"� Or(I301) 367 MAIN 3`V'R1 ET HYANNIS,NIA 02601 Abutter Notification Map and Labels; from the Towri of Barnstable Website ' ftw ID;wi6e;+ i ' r3E iDETSON':RICHARD!; -63 ATLANMC AVENUE BOSTON.NfA 02110 ittep lD:a33aSSi77i. DENDETS01•RICHARD K G3 ATLANTIC AVENUE BosT0t,MA 02110 t12RIY.�933U1Si�q� . CONATHr\N,.JOH1 II TR DFE REALTY TRUST CJO DEG;ROBERf R TR 104 THATCHER COURT NOW144 WALES,PA 19454 PmpID:0i19D? ,. � , DER.HAGOPIAN,DAVID 1 TR DAVIDJ DER HAGOI'IANTRUST 1900 St3.�-ctdrrTOWER RVD•STF 900 ORLANDO.FL 32810 1yx 03iLlC DER,HAGOPIAN,DAVID J TR DAVID J DER HAGOPIAN TRUST Ig00$LI\9tIrrTOWER HLVD SI3rrE 900 ORLANDO,FL 32910 May 1, 2013 Page C-2 Der Hagopian Trust Notice of Intent Environmental Landscape Consultants, LLC . s ATTACHMENT D PROJECT PLANS; ATTACHED SEPARATELY C May 1, 2013 N V I R O N M E N T A L dba Talbot Ecological Land Care LANDSCAPE CONSULTANTS,LLC Certified Consulting Arborists,Horticulturists and Conservation Designers Natural Landscape Design and Tree,Shrub and Lawn Care Services Consultation,Education,Permitting,Installation and Management To: The Barnstable Conservation Commission and Rob Gatewood, Conservation Administrator Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) and its adverse environmental effects Compiled by Michael Talbot, MCH, ISA, ASCA; restoration ecologist; UMass Certificate in Invasive Species Management; former vice-chair, Mashpee Conservation Commission; consultant, lecturer and educator s Recently, you received a letter from Tom Rawinski, a forester based out of Durham, NH, regarding black locust management. I did not see the original letter from Mr. Blazis to Tom Rawinski, but Mr. Rawinski s comments are not very relevant to the project proposed at 265 Ocean View Avenue in Cotuit. As he, himself, states in the letter: "While 'I cannot comment of the specifics of that proposal..." ...and, indeed, he has no knowledge of the site and the situation in this particular case. In fact, it appears that Mr. Rawinski is talking about black locust growing in a forest environment. We do not disagree with that part of his discussion, as black locust is considered more of an understory tree in its native range in the Allegheny and Ozark Mountains. However, in disturbed areas outside of its native range black locust can have very adverse effects on native habitats and plant communities. A perfect example of that is in our site and situation in Cotuit, where we are very concerned about black locust invading sandplain and maritime habitats on Cape Cod. As Mr. Rawinski states in his letter: "Having said that, the critical question often involves the context, or setting, where a particular, invasive plant species occurs. As an example, when I worked as the Massachusetts Audubon Society's Director of Ecological Management, we determined that root sprouts of Black Locust invading a coastal grassland at the Wellfleet Bay Wildlife Sanctuary posed at [sic] threat. We set out to control it there." Exactly; one of the principal reasons that black locust is listed as an invasive species and/or noxious weed in Massachusetts', the rest of New England, 19 other states and many ' See the Massachusetts Prohibited Plant List at http://www.invasive.org/species/list.cfm?id=50. P.O.Box 187,Mashpee,MA 02649 Office:508-539-1912 Email:info@michael-talbot.com Fax:508-539-8865 Why and Where Black Locust Should be Managed Environmental Landscape Consultants LLC provinces in Canada, is that it invades and disrupts grasslands, shrublands and other important and sometimes rare habitats—especially on poor, sandy soils. The Invasive Plant Atlas of New England (IPANE) lists this tree as an invasive species and describes some of this species' adverse effects on native plant communities.2 IPANE notes the tree's rapid growth and ability to crowd out native plants by forming "tall, dense, monotypic stands." IPANE and other sources also note that the black locust, with its fragrant blooms that some consider attractive, attracts pollinators that would otherwise pollinate native plants important to wildlife. This competition reduces the ability of more valuable native plants to produce mast. This is especially significant as black locust itself T t tia has very low wildlife habitat value (see below). 6 ' When the Commonwealth of Virginia Cooperative Extension Service needed an Y.. example of where a species native to one part of the country can be invasive elsewhere,' t ., they used the photograph on the right. The caption under the photo reads: "Young black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) and Chinese bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculatus) have invaded the Cape Cod National Seashore in b Massachusetts. Black locust, despite being ` native to several U.S. states is threatening natural areas of several other states. U.S. invasive species rank for both species: high/ medium." (Photo taken by Professor Betsy Von Holle, Univ. of Central Florida). IPANE notes research that demonstrates the damage black locusts do by encouraging the rapid growth of other invasive species—as seen in the photo above and on the dunes and interdunal areas at 265 Ocean View Avenue—in areas where they might not be as competitive. This tree's ability to fix nitrogen, seen by some as a "benefit", encourages the growth of invasive species, such as shrub honeysuckle (Lonicera spp.), Scotch broom (Cytisus 2 See http://www.eddmaps.org/ipane/ipanespecies/trees/Robinia_pseudoacacia.htm. 3 Alex X.Niemiera, and Betsy Von Holle, Invasive Plants—A Horticultural Perspective,Publication 426-080,Virginia Tech,2009. April 20,2013 Page 2 Why and Where Black Locust Should be Managed Erivironmen:al Landscape Consultants LLC scoparius), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera.japonica), Oriental bittersweet, and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora). As noted in many references, black locust is particularly damaging in sandy, nutrient poor areas where rare plant communities, such as coastal dunes, sandplain grassland and sandplain heathland, are more competitive in these poor soils. In the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, where black locust is native to the Allegheny . Mountains in the central part of the State, the Pennsylvania Natural,Heritage Program (PNHP) describes endangered Black Oak Savanna and Great Plains Sand Barrens habitats along Lake Erie severely threatened by invasive species—including black locust.: The shade from the dense, suckering black locusts on the very sandy soils was considered so threatening to these sandplain habitats that the PNHP embarked on a large scale eradication project at the Erie Bluffs State Park in 2009. PNHP also describes a black locust eradication project to protect the nesting grounds of piping plovers at the Presque Isle State'Park4—in a habitat very similar to the one we are trying to restore adjacent to The Loop Beach. Here in Massachusetts, both sandplain grassland and sandplain heathland are listed as S1 habitats by the Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species . Program (NHESP)—two of only a handful of S1 ranked (critically imperiled) terrestrial habitats in the Commonwealth. Coastal dunes are ranked as an S2 habitat (threatened.) In these habitats, as noted above and in many other references I could site, black locusts are a potentially serious invasive species because of their aggressive, shallow root system, ability to sucker extensively, forming, dense, tom' ��- ;s• �`�- monotypic stands, and its :_ �' :. � � ''Al" >f nitrogen fixation, providing habitat for other invasive ti� ",� �; � _ " = � "• � species not adapted to poor, a f sandy, droughty soils. This is f y evident in the photo to the right showing a dense, monotypic stand of black locust that has invaded a sandy area in Brewster—an area that was once coastal shrubland (and where there are heathland { p habitats nearby) and now 4 Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program,"Wild Heritage News",July-September 2012,pp.6-7. April 20,2013 Page 3 CI Why and Where Black Locust Should be Managed Environmental Landscape Consultants LLC dominated by many invasive species including tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and shrub honeysuckle. On the dunes, coastal beach and interdunal y# areas at 265 Ocean View '*ka, Avenue—not including the coastal bank—we _ f counted approximately 120 saplings and root sg S '4. suckers of black locust just within the relativelyQX small area where these sensitive areas are � located on this property. The photo at the top of � p, this page shows a view of the black locust trees t. invading the primary dune and beach area—photos taken on the day of our site assessment with Rob Gatewood on March 29, 2013. The red arrows show examples of the small root suckers just getting established on the forward edges of the dune and on the coastal beach— every tree in this photo is a black locust. In the near future this will be a dense forest of taller black locust crowding out the beachgrass and other native vegetation and encouraging the r_ ,1 growth of invasive species g — includin the Scotch broom visible in the photograph and ` `.; a dense population of shrub and vine honeysuckle, multiflora rose, Oriental bittersweet and beach rose (Rosa rugosa) nearby. These black locust suckers and g trees extend all the way to the property boundary of Loop Beach, as seen in the photo to the left. Red arrows show root April 20 2013 Page 4 p 9 Why and Where Black Locust Should be Managed Environmental Landscape Consultants LLC suckers right along the fence. The black locusts were not observed beyond the boundary fence, where they are possibly being managed by Town staff to prevent impacts on residents and beachgoers. If not, the black locusts, with their large, sharp thorns, will soon be invading the Loop Beach area and impacting residents and guests. If the Town is managing black locust on Loop Beach—or wishes to do so in the future—we contend that we should be allowed to manage this invasive plant as well. The photo to the right shows a view of a rare, sensitive habitat on this site in Cotuit. The red sue.. arrow in this photo sr .. shows an area of - sandplain heathland habitat observed on the t J • _ dune, including beach heather Hudsonia tomentosa) visible near the arrow. As is also visible in the foreground of this `; A> ,*� . 3 R . z. , s y , IA � t photo, the black locusts , are invading this S1 ranked habitat—a plant community that will most certainly be threatened by the growing forest of black locusts and Scotch broom invading this area. Every upright stem seen in the dune and heathland area is a black locust root sucker. Other Issues with Black Locust • The black locust, touted by some as a valuable wildlife habitat species, is listed as a species with very low wildlife habitat value by numerous authoritative sources. See, for example, Gary L. Hightshoe, Native Trees, Shrubs, and Vines for Urban and Rural America: A Planting Design Manual for Environmental Designers (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York: 1988; p. 324. • Contrast the black locust with the native pitch pine (Pinus rigida) which is listed in Hightshoe as having very high wildlife habitat value. In Massachusetts the pitch pine April 20,2013 Page 5 Why and Where Black Locust Should be Managed Environmental Landscape Consultants LLC is associated with scrub oak (Quercus illicifolia), which High tshoe notes on page 642 has "very high [wildlife value]; at the top of wildlife food list, songbirds, gamebirds, waterbirds, large and small mammals." They form a pine barrens habitat called "pitch pine-scrub oak communities"—an S2 ranked habitat by the NHESP—or scrub oak- pitch pine barrens. This is why we have proposed replacing black locusts with these and related species of greater value and managing this habitat in the future. Once valued for its durable l m er, black locusts—especially on the poor, dry, sand Y soils—are being severely attacked by the native black locust borer (Megacyllene robiniae). These insects attack the trees when young and make the trees weak-wooded and more hazardous. There are examples of black locusts broken in recent storms on this site because of the damage this insect does to these trees. Even though we believe that black locusts provide no wildlife habitat value or protect conservation interests not otherwise better protected by native plants—and that leaving black locusts anywhere on this property provides a source of future infestation of this species in these sensitive, maritime areas—we would agree to forego treatment of black locusts on the coastal bank outside of the delineated narrow zone of management and revegetation around the rebuilt stairs, as noted on the revised plan. This leaves fourteen (14) black locusts on the coastal bank, along with invasive Norway maples, shrub honeysuckles and so on. There are Oriental bittersweet vines killing red cedars and other native plants throughout the coastal bank, including the area outside of the revegetation area around the new stairs and deck. We would like to manage these plants to help protect these native species, but if the Commission wants to leave this portion of the bank untouched, we would agree to do so. If you have any questions, we will address them at the hearing. Thank you for your consideration. April 20,2013 Page 6 DC).-- 1 V 2'2:L r 0 1.2 05-13-201 3 2--2 r' BARNSTABLE: LAND COURT REGISTRY ' - 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided byMassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection-Wetlands MassDEP File#:003-5072 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions eDEP Transaction#:562315 Ll Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L.a. 131,§40 Cityrrown:BARNSTABLE A. General Information i 1.Conservation Commission BARNSTABLE 2. Issuance a. r OOC b.(w Amended OOC 3.Applicant Details _ 1 a.First Name DAVID b.Last Naine DER HAGOPIAN,TR. ' c.Organization DAVID J.DER HAGOPIAN TRUST a d.Mailing Address 1900 SUMMIT TOWER BLVD.,SUITE 900 e.City/rown ORLANDO f.State FL g.Zip Code 32810 4. Property Owner - LL a.First Name DAVID b.Last Name DER HAGOPIAN,TR. c.Organization DAVID J.DER HAGOPIAN TRUST d.Mailing Address 1900 SUMMIT TOWER BLVD.,SUITE 900 , e.Cityfrown ORLANDO f.State FL` g.Zip Code 32810 + 5. Project Location a.Street Address 265 OCEAN VIEW AVENUE b.Cityfrown BARNSTABLE c.Zip Code 02635 d.Assessors Map/Plat#033 e..Parcel/Lot# 020 f Latitude 41.6067N g.Longitude 70,43712W 6. Property recorded at the Registry of Deed for: a.County b.Certificate c.Book d.Page' - BARNSTABLE C. 187881'LCP 6713-B 7.Dates a.Date NOI Filed:2/21/2013 b.Date Public Hearing Closed: 4/30/2013 c.Date Of Issuance: 5/9/2013 8.Final Approved Plans and Other.Documents. a.Plan Title: b.Plan Prepared by: c.Plan Signed/Stamped by: d.Revised Final Date: e:Scale: i REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE N/A 4/9/2013 VARIOUS LANDSCAPE PLAN CONSULTANTS,LLC r (UNSTAMPED) * . Page 1 of 9 ELECTRONIC COPY 41 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection-Wetlands MassDEP File#:003-5072 WPA Form 5-Older of Conditions eDEP Transaction#:562315 City/1'own:BARNSTABLE Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L.c. 131,§40 1 E REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL NARRATIVE OF LANDSCAPE N/A 5/1/2013, N/A NOTICE OF CONSULTANTS,LLC INTENT I B. Findings 1.Finditigs pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Following the review of the the above-referenced Notice of Intent and based on the information provided in this application and presented at the public hearing,this Commission finds that the areas in which work is proposed is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act. Check al I that apply: a r Public Water Supply b r Land Containing Shellfish c F Prevention of Pollution d. r Private Water Supply e. r- Fisheries f. I!—!. Protection of Wildlife Habitat t s g. r Ground Water Supply h. F. Storm Damage Prevention i. E Flood Control 2.Commission hereby finds the project,as proposed,is: Approved subject to: a.r:The following conditions which are necessary in accordance with the performance standards set forth in the wetlands regulations. This Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the Notice of Intent referenced above,the following General Conditions,and any other special conditions attached to this Order.To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans,specifications,or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,these conditions shall control. Denied because: b.l-The proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations.Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect interests of the Act,and a final Order of Conditions is issued.A description of the performance standards which the proposed work cannot meet is attached to this Order. c.F,The information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site,the work or the effect of the work on the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act.Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the interests of the Act,and a final Order of Conditions is issued.A description of the specific information which is lacking and why it is necessary is attached to this Order as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). 3.r- Buffer Zone Impacts:Shortest distance between limit of project disturbance and the wetland resource area specified in 310CMR10.02(1)(a). a.linear feet Inland Resource Area Impacts:(For Approvals Only): Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration' Alteration Replacement Replacement 4. f Bank a.linear feet b.linear feet c.linear feet d.linear feet 5.r Bordering Vegetated Wetland Page 2 of 9* ELECTRONIC COPY t Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Ll Bureau of Resource Protection-Wetlands MassDEP File#:003-5072 WPA Form 5-Order of Conditions eDEP Transaction#:562315Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L.c. 131, §40 Citt/iown:BARNSTABLE a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet G. r Land under Waterbodies and Waterways a.square feet b.square feet. c.square feet 'd.square feet e.c/y dredged f.c/y dredged 7.1-Bordering Land Subject to Flooding A.square feet, b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage e.cubic feet f.cubic feet. g.cubic feet h.cubic feet 8.r-Isolated Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b_square feet ! Cubic Feet Flood Storage c:cubic feet d_.cubic feet e.cubic feet f.cubic feet 9.r Riverfront Area a.total sq.feet b.total sq.feet Sq ft within 100 ft c.square feet d.square feet e.square feet f.square feet Sq ft between 100-200 ft g.square feet h.-square feet is square feet j.square feet Coastal Resource Area Impacts: y Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 10.r—,-Designated Port Areas Indic_ate size under Land Under the Ocean,below 1 I.l"Land Under the Ocean a.square feet b.square feet r c.c/y dredged d.c/y dredged l 12.r—Barrier Beaches Indicate.size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes Below 13.1 Coastal Beaches a.square feet b.square feet c.c/y nourishment d.c/y nourishment 14.r Coastal Dunes 10650 IOtiSQ it.square feet b.square feet c.c/y nourishment d.c/y nourishment 15.F�,Coastal Banks 170 170 a.linear feet b.linear feet 16.r•Rocky Intertidal Shores a.square feet b.square feet 17.r Salt Marshes a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet Page 3 of 9* ELECTRONIC COPY t , Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided byMassDEP: �j Bureau of Resource Protection-Wetlands MassDEP File#:003-5072 WPA Form 5- Order of Conditions eDEP Transaction#:562315 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L.c. 131, §40 City/Town:BARNSTABLE ; 18.f75 Land Under Salt Ponds a.square feet b.square feet c.c/y dredged d.c/y dredged 19.r Land Containing Shellfish a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet Indicate size under Coastal Banks,inland Bank,Land Under the 20.r Fish Runs Ocean,and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above c.c/y dredged d.c/y dredged 21.r Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage a.square feet b.square feet 22. r Restoration/Enhancement(For Approvals Only) If the project is for the purpose of restoring or enhancing a wetland resource area in addition to the square footage that has been entered in Section B.5.c&d or B.17.c&d above,please entered the additional amount here. a.square feet of BVW b.square feet of Salt Marsh 23. f'Streams Crossing(s) If the project involves Stream Crossings,please enter the number of new stream crossings/number of replacement stream crossings. a.number of new stream crossings b.number of replacement stream crossings C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act The following conditions are only applicable to Approved projects I. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein,and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures,shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges;it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state,or local statutes,ordinances,bylaws,or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: a.the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act;or b.the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years,but less than five years,from the date of issuance.If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three years,the extension date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth as a special condition in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. If this Order constitutes an Amended Order of Conditions,this Amended Order of Conditions does not exceed the issuance date of the original Final Order of Conditions. Page 4 of 9*ELECTRONIC COPY t I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection . Provided by MassDEP: MassDEP File#:003-5072 Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands I 'r` WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions eDEP Transaction#:562315 City/I'own:BARNSTABLE Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L.c. 131, §40 t 7. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill.Any fill shall contain no trash,refuse,rubbish,or debris,including but not limited to lumber,bricks,plaster,wire,lath,paper,cardboard,pipe,tires,ashes,refrigerators,motor vehicles,or parts of any of the foregoing. ' 1 8. This Order is not final until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed,or if such an appeal has been taken, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 9. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and then has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property.In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the , proposed work is to be done.In the case of the registered land,the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done.The recording information shall be submitted { to the Conservation Commission on the form at the end of this Order;which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, t prior to the commencement of work.. 10. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less then two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection" [or'MassDEP"] File Number:"003-5072" t 11. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order,the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before Mass DER 12. Upon completion of the work described herein,the applicant shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance(WPA Form 8A)'to the Conservation Commission. 13. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 14. Any change to the plans identified in Condition#13 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. 15. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compliance with the.conditions stated in this Order,and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that " evaluation. 16. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person performing work conditioned by this Order. 17. Prior to the start of work,and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland;the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging.Once in place,the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 18. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized with vegetation or other means.At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body.During construction,the applicant or his/her t designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed.The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission,which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of work line has been approved by this Order. NOTICE OF STORMWATER CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 19. The work associated with this Order(the"Project")is(1) r is not(2)r,subject to the Massachusetts Siormwater Standards. - If the work is subject to Stormwater Standards,then the project is subject to the following conditions; ` 'a) All work,including site preparation,land disturbance,construction and redevelopment,shall be implemented in accordance 1 t with the construction period pollution prevention and erosion and sedimentation control plan and,if applicable,the t i Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction`General Permit as required by Stormwater Standard 8.Construction period erosion,sedimentation and pollution control measures and best management practices(BMPs)shall remain in place until the site is fully stabilized. Page 5 of 9 * ELECTRONIC COPY 1 1 t i Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection-Wetlands MassDEP File#:003-5072 623 WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions eDEP Transaction TABL 15 City/i'own:BARNSTABLE Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L.c. 131,§40 i cti n stormwater MP unless and until a Registered t b) No stormwater runoff may be discharged to the post-constru o o BMPs � Professional Engineer provides a Certification that:is all construction period BMPs have been removed or will be removed by a date certain specified in the Certification.For any construction period BMPs intended to be converted to post construction operation for stormwater attenuation,recharge,and/or treatment,the conversion is allowed by the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook BMP specifications and that the BMP has been properly cleaned or prepared for post construction operation, including removal of all construction period sediment trapped in inlet and outlet control structures;ii..as-built final construction BMP plans are included,signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer,certifying the site is fully stabilized;iii. any illicit discharges to the stormwater management system have been removed,as per the requirements of Stormwater Standard 10;iv. all post-construction stormwater BMPs are installed in accordance with the plans(including all planting plans)approved by the issuing authority,and have been inspected to ensure that they are not damaged and that they are in proper working condition;_v.any vegetation associated with post-construction BMPs is suitably established to withstand erosion. c) The landowner is responsible for BiVIP maintenance until the issuing authority is notified that another party has legally assumed responsibility for BMP maintenance.Prior to requesting a Certificate of Compliance,or Partial Certificate of Compliance,the responsible parry(defined in General Condition 19(e))shall execute and submit to the issuing authority an Operation and Maintenance Compliance Statement("O&M Statement")for the Stormwater BMPs identifying the party responsible for implementing the stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan("O&M Plan")and certifying the following:i.)the O&M Plan is complete and will be implemented upon receipt of the Certificate of Compliance,and ii.)the future responsible parties shall be notified in writing of their ongoing legal responsibility to operate and maintain the stormwater management BMPs and implement the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. d) Post-construction pollution prevention and source control shall be implemented in accordance with the long-term pollution prevention plan section of the approved Stormwater Report and,if applicable,the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Multi-Sector General Permit. e) Unless and until another party accepts responsibility,the landowner,or owner of any drainage easement,assumes responsibility for maintaining each BMP.To overcome this presumption,the landowner of the property must submit to the issuing authority a legally binding agreement of record,acceptable to the issuing authority,evidencing that another entity has accepted responsibility for maintaining the BMP,and that the proposed responsible party shall be treated as a permittee for purposes of implementing the requirements of Conditions 19(f)through 19(k)with respect to that BMP.Any failure of the proposed responsible party to implement the requirements of Conditions 19(f)through 19(k)with respect to that BMP shall be a violation of the Order of Conditions or Certificate of Compliance.In the case of stormwater BMPs that are serving more than one lot,the legally binding agreement shall also identify the lots that will be serviced by the stormwater BMPs.A plan and easement deed that grants the responsible party access to perform the required operation and maintenance must be submitted along with the legally binding agreement. f) The responsible party shall operate and maintain all stormwater BMPs in accordance with the design plans,the O&M Plan, and the requirements of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. g) The responsible party shall: 1.Maintain an operation and maintenance log for the last three(3)consecutive calendar years of inspections,repairs, maintenance and/or replacement of the stormwater management system or any part thereof,and disposal(for disposal the log shall indicate the type of material and the disposal location); 2.Make the maintenance log available to MassDEP and the Conservation Commission("Commission")upon request;and 3.Allow members and agents of the MassDEP and the Commission to enter and inspect the site to evaluate and ensure that the responsible party is in compliance with the requirements for each BMP established in the 0&M Plan approved by the issuing authority. h) All sediment or other contaminants removed from stormwater l3MPs shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicable federal,state,and local laws and regulations. i) Illicit discharges to the stormwater management system as defined in 310 CM.R 10.04 are prohibited. j) The stormwater management system approved in the Order of Conditions shall not be changed without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. Page 6 of 9* ELECTRONIC COPY Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection-Wetlands Ll MassDEP File#:003-5072 WPA Form 5 -Order of Conditions eDEP Transaction#:562315 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L.c. 131,§40 City(fown;BARNSTABLE k) Areas designated as qualifying pervious areas for the purpose of the Low Impact Site Design Credit(as defined in the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook,Volume 3,Chapter 1,Low Impact Development Site Design Credits)shall not be altered l without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. I) Access for maintenance,repair,and/or replacement of BMPs shall not be withheld.Any fencing constructed around stormwater BMPs shall include access gates and shall be at'least six inches above grade to allow for wildlife passige. Special Conditions: t A Findings Under Municipal. Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance I. Is a municipal wetlands bylaw or ordinance applicable?r Yes C, No 2. The Conservation Commission hereby(check one that applies a. F.- DENIES the proposed work which cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw specifically: 1.Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw 2.Citation Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides l measures which are adequate to meet these standards,and a final Order or Conditions is issued.Which are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw: b' r APPROVES the proposed work,subject to the following , additional conditions. Bylaw I.Municipal Ordinance or B TOWN OF p y BARNSTABLE 2•Citation S.237-1 -237-14 3. The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the following conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above.To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans,specifications,or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,the conditions shall control. The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as follows: SEE PAGES 7.1 AND 7.2 - i t I e E Page 7 of 9*ELECTRONIC COPY t E !!k i t SE3-5072 Name: David J. Der Hagopian,Tr. Approved Plan= April 9,2013 Revised Conservation Landscape Plan (unstamped)by Environmental Landscape Consultants,LLC,and May 1,2013 Revised Notice of Intent Narrative by same. Special Conditions of Approval I. Preface Caution: Failure to comply with all Conditions of this Order of Conditions may result in serious con sequences. Such consequences may include issuance of a Stop Work Order,fine(s),the requirement to remove unpermitted structures,requirement to re-landscape to original condition,the inability to obtain a Certificate of Compliance,and more. The General Conditions of this Order begin on Page 4 and continue on Pages 5 through 7. The Special Conditions,if necessarv, are contained on Pages 7.1,7.2 and 7.3 All Conditions contained herein require strict compliance. II. Prior to the start of work,the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1. Within one month of receipt of this Order of Conditions,and prior to the commencement of any work approved herein,General Condition Number 8(recording requirement)on Page 4 shall be complied with. 2. It is the responsibility of the applicant,the owner and/or successor(s),and the project contractor,to ensure that all conditions of this Order are complied with. The applicant shall provide copies of the Order of Conditions and approved plans(and any approved revisions thereof)to project contractors prior to the start of work. Barnstable Conservation Commission Forms A and B shall be completed and returned to the Commission prior to the start of work. 3. General Condition No.9 on Page 4(sign requirement)shall be complied with. 4. The Conservation Commission shall receive written notice one(1)week in advance of the start of work. III. The following additional conditions shall govern the project once work begins: 5. General Conditions Nos. 12 and 13(changes in plan)on Page 5 shall be complied with. 6. The Conservation Comnssion, its employees,and its agents shall have a right of entry to inspect for compliance with the provisions of this Order of Conditions. 7. Unless extended,this permit is valid for three years from the date of issuance. Page 7.1 I 1 f 8. All areas disturbed during construction shall be revegetated immediately following completion of work at the site. No disturbed areas shall be left unvegetated or unmulched for more than thirty(30)days. ! 4 Mulching shall not serve as a substitute.for the requirement,to revegetate disturbed areas at the conclusion t of work. ( 9. CCA-treated piling and structural timber(greater than three[3] inches thick)are allowed. Otherwise,no t CCA-treated or creosote-treated materials shall be used. 10. The proposed stairs shall be constructed a minimum of one foot above grade without solid risers. 11. Deck plank spacing shall be at least three-quarters('/4)of an inch, f 12. All work shall.conform to the approved revised plan and its notes,and the revised notice of intent narrative. 13. The proposed pitch pine and scrub oak planting shall be completed. 14. No black locust removal shall ensue on the coastal bank. 1 15. Oriental bittersweet control is herein approved. i t 16. Annual progress reports shall be submitted in late fall for three years,post initiation of the invasives control project. IV. After all work is completed,the following condition shall be promptly met: 17. .At the completion of work,or by the expiration of this Order,the applicant shall request in writing a Certificate of Compliance for the work herein permitted. Barnstable Conservation Commission Form C shall be completed and returned with the request for a Certificate of Compliance Where a project has been completed in accordance with plans stamped by a.registered professional engineer,architect,landscape - architect or land surveyor,a written statement by such a professional shall be submitted, certifying. ,. substantial compliance with the plans,setting forth what deviation(s),if any;exists with the approved plans: This statement,along with Form C;shall accompany the request for a Certificate of Compliance. 4 Page 7.2 3 I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands SE3-5072 f WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File# Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction# Barnstable Cityrrown f E. Signatures Important: This Order is valid for three years, unless otherwise specified as a special MAY — 9 2013 When filling out condition pursuant to General Conditions#4,from the date of issuance. 1.Date of Issuance forms on the computer,use Please indicate the number of members who will sign this form. only the tab key This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. 2.Number of Signers to move your cursor-do not The Order must be mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested)or hand delivered to use the return the applicant. A copy must be mailed, hand delivered or filed electronically at the same key. time with the appropriate MassDEP Regional Office. VQ Si atures: iarwn -,J v ❑ by hand delivery on by certified mail,return receipt requested,on MAY - 2013 Date Date F. Appeals The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order,or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located,are hereby notified of their right to request the appropriate MassDEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Conditions.The request must be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Request of Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form, as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7) within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. Any appellants seeking to appeal the Department's Superseding Order associated with this appeal will be required to demonstrate prior participation in the review of this project. Previous participation in the permit proceeding means the submission of written information to the Conservation Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, requesting a Superseding Order, or providing written information to the Department prior to issuance of a Superseding Order. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being appealed and how the Order does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act(M:G.L.c. 131, §40), and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations (310 CMR 10.00). To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. wpa5sigs.doc• rev.02/25/2010 Page 5rof� FBureMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: au V" of Resource Protection-Wetlands MassDEP File 9:003-5072 WPA Form 5- Order of Conditions eDEP Transaction TABLi5 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L.c. 131;§40 City�lo�yn:BARNSTABLE G. Recording Information i This Order of Conditions must be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property.In the case of recorded land,the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land subject to the Order.In the case of registered land,this Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land subject to the Order of Conditions.The recording information on this page shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission listed below. BARNSTABLE Conservation Commission Detach on dotted line,have stamped by the Registry of Deeds and submit to the Conservation Commission. .................................................................................... . .. To: BARNSTABLE Conservation Commission Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the Project at: I i 265 OCEAN VIEW AVENUE 003-5072 Project Location MassDEP File Number Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of. County Book Page for. Property Owner DAVID DER HAGOPIAN,TR. and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in: , Book Page ' In accordance with the Order of Conditions issued on: Date I i 4 If recorded land,the instrument number identifying this transaction is: Instrument Number t If registered land,the document number identifying this transaction is: I Document Number Doc z I v 221 r 1042 05-18-201',3 . 2--2 9 BARNSTABLE LAND COURT REGISTRY ' t Signature of Applicant Re.iAl?010 Page 9 of 9* ELECTRONIC COPY ' t S i Fa -T TOWN OF BARNSTABLE LOCATION a�OoZ ©C.CJai i U;eeW �/�k SEWAGE # �V/0- 10 U VILLAGE L O t� ' ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT Z 3 J0 INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. R} S i0-901 Y SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY ( J V 0 - Zy LEACHING FACILITY: (type) " �S (size) 5�•S ,X +Z•�� I NO.OF BEDROOMS BUILDER OR OWNER 40F.-cm C— %co PERMTTDATE: & ` as-- ( ( COMPLIANCE DATE: Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table to the Bottom of Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of leaching facility) Feet Furnished by f Zi3 93 7/f- f , �-b. &Y a3 w � TOWN OF BARNSTABLE LOCATION OCcA/\ V I CW br. SEWAGE# VILLAGE C b-rV ASSESSOR'S MAP&PARCEL 0-153 " d da" INSTALLERS NAME&PHONE NO. SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY C0 SP W LEACHING FACILITY:(type)_CA 6n , (size) NO.OF BEDROOMS L I OWNER Purz PERMIT DATE: COMPLIANCE DATE: Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table to the Bottom of Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility(If any wells exist on site or withim 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of leaching facility) Feet FURNISHED BY �i�SAtc,Ti y�1 �0/ 4 B C>eLk I Q i 3 35" 4/ s� No. /0 �-L Y.• i r. r� 91 Fee /5 � ; THE(,COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHU6ETTS Entered in computer: PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION -TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS Yes application for Disposal 6pstem Construction permit Application for a Permit to Construct( ) Repair( ) Upgrade X Abandon( ) ❑Complete System ❑Individual Components Location Address or Lot No.o1,6a ocjafo N lE Owner's Name ogjj�Address and Tel.No. DA A*_ AN 6570807)19 —8919 Assessor's Map/Parcel tAkV T3, 1PA9,0E to a \100 SOWA O LL 3 a SN O Ins ler's Npe ,e,�dres end Tel.NN . Designer's Name,Address d Tel.No. q9/11a .349 MITE a uv t r w.VA040�_VN VAA Type of ildi g:g �o" ' Dwelling No.of Bedrooms Lot Size ���3( sq.ft. Garbage Grindh( ) Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow(min.required) to(,o gpd Design flow provided l gpd Plan Date IT01I)s \$, a0X0 Number of sheets ®� Revision Date Title SEWAG'C bisPo.SAU SYS'-rEM lFp(yQ., OF Size of Septic Tank 1,SO0 (->A11r. Type of S.A.S. C®NGQtTE- C4k&p��R,S YW GAL) Description of Soil Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) {LiEV43k11Z_ VXIS'1-14 r. C VOOLS ANf t)g- 1 N0A SYSTLIM TO St*M11 X -Mx-- QEW 'DWELLING Date last inspected: Agreement: The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the fore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 de and not to 1 e the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by this oard of Health. Si a Date Application Approve Date lo J,-)t-5110 Application Disapproved by Date for the following reasons Permit No. ��>� � Date Issued l6 -------------------- -No. �/Q �� ,tom �. .� t. 15 - i4. 4 �'l� � \� _ Fee FIE COMMONWEALTH,OF MASSA ,HU 0 TS Entered in computer: PUBLIC HEALTH DI VISION -TOWN 1OF,BARNS B E, MASSACHUSETTS Yes application .for Nsposar Opsteru C tion hermit Application for a Permit to Cor struct( ) /Repair( ) Upgrade X':Abandon( ) ❑Complete System ❑Individual Components Location Address or Lot No.aoa oc"a\l 1 EW_ A.' - Owner's Name,Address,and Tel.No. C.l t DAJ\0 Qey—khrbOftAN 65,09)778 —8919 Assessor's Map/Parcel Q '33 PARGE L a \900 SUMM . Q\) 0o V 3 a SN O Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. Designer's Name,Address, d Tel.No. o� gSC G�ovp,lac,. (soe)778-891q eW / .A�vh•7 U J$� /s'/.ass. 3 9 aUTE a8 u?lfT � w.'CAKMptiS'M MA Type of vildi g.Dwelling No.of Bedrooms (o Lot Size S,3(oO sq.ft. Garbage Grinder{ ) Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures 4 i Design Flow(min.required) r0(1 b gpd Design flow provided 6 to gpd Plan Date ,1u1J1_ k8 a0\0 Number of sheets vZ Revision Date Title SEW&GE biSPbSAL SYS't M UEGF.AOE Size of Septic Tank \i50O G7AL._ Type of S.A.S. s C.OPIC•RTETE CJA#.Nair R S SQ'� GAL Description of Soil .. x Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) VS-Y4\0JC 1EX i ST1►.1 r,, C€�S�OC)tx AN Q D Sl(,Li TASW SYS-6EM To )jlC•:E —M\'t-- ►1E.W K)W1=LL)MG . r Date last inspected: Agreement: The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the-Environmen •I ode and riot to lace the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by this Board of Health. Si ne� Date Application Approved by V l r Date )a5_ /Q Application Disapproved by Date for the following reasons Permit No. Date Issued THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE,MASSACHUSETTS Certificate of Compfiante THIS IS TO CERT17,that the On-site Sewage Disposal system Constructed( ) Repaired( ) Upgraded(� Abandoned( )by {Y,f\ + 'at aba (Xc AO v E-W AV 5 f-W 1, � has been constructed in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 and the for Disposal System Construction Permit No o O'"A?&dated Installer Designer Rsc. G9='pu'F,_)Qi _ #bedrooms ('p Approved design flow / — �,(�n gpd The issuance of this permit shall dot be construed as a guarantee that the system will f ctiomastde;i'P_,,ed. Date 2c' ! 1 Inspector No. - Fee THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION BARNSTABLE,MASSACHUSETTS Misposal *pstem Construction Jermit Permission is hereby granted to Cor_struct( ) Repair( ) Upgrade(<) Abandon( ) System located at atoa nt�rhh� v Tc l") AV>_mu G C.cft`t yT and as described in the above Application for Disposal System Construction Permit. The applicant recognized his/her duty to comply with Title 5 and the following local provisions or special conditions. Provided:Construction must be completed within three years of the date of this 1per f lmit. Date f/3 / 4� /a Approved b � Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services °.� Thomas F. Geiler, Director ; Y sextvsrnst.E, „„ Public Health Division 1639..�A Thomas McKean, Director 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4644 Fax: 508-790-6304 Date: 8/0 8/2 011 Sewage Permit# ; Assessor's Map/Parcel 3 3/2 Installer& Designer Certification Form Designer: BSC GROUP, INC. Installer• R & H Construction, Inc. Address: 349 Route 28, Unit D Address: f W. Yarmouth, MA 02673 , On was issued a permit to install a (date) (installer) septic system at 262 Ocean view Ave, . Cotuit based on a design drawn by (address) f BSC GROUP, INC. ,dated 6/18/2010 (designer) i X I certify that the septic system referenced above was installed substantially according to the design, which may include minor approved changes such as lateral relocation of the distribution box and/or septic tank. Stripout (if required) was inspected and the soils were found satisfactory. I certify that the septic system referenced above was installed with major changes (i.e. greater than 10' lateral relocation of the SAS or any vertical relocation of any component of the septic system) but in accordance with State & Local Regulations. Plan revision or certified as-built by designer to follow. Stripout (if required) was inspected and the soils were fo d sati I"OF kJq,9 d e a0 SRIAN G. (In is Signature) YERGATIAN CIVtL No.48206 'G/STEP esig er s igna e) (Affix D p Here) PLEASE RETURN TO BARNSTABLE PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION.- CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL BOTH THIS FORM AND AS- BUILT CARD ARE RECEIVED BY THE BARNSTABLE PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION. THANK YOU. q:\office formsWesignercertification form.doc I Commonwealth of Massachusetts 10011.6581 Asbestos Notification Form ANF-001 Decal Number Important:when tieing out A. Asbestos Abatement Description forms on the computer,use 1. a. Is this facility fee exempt-city, town, district, municipal housing authority, owner-occupied only the tab key residence of four units or less?❑✓ Yes ❑No to move your cursor-do not b. Provide blanket decal number if applicable: use the return Blanket Decal Number. key. 2. Facility Location: MACKENZIE � 1262 OCEAN VIEW.". —� a.Name of Facility b.Street Address *� BARNSTABLE -� MA 02635 — � c.City/Town ;(,p d.State e.Zip Code f.Telephone Number INSTRUCTIONS 3. : Worksite Location: 1.All sections of this-. EXTERIOR . form must be a Building Name/Building-Location b Building# c..Wing d..Floor a Room completed in order tµ gt .a A,.. icu,d0: Mr�-vtwo:....—COMPr .tti YuiLy.vwuN. DEP notification J INV.ALv.. - ZE a a requirements of 310 a } CMR 7.15 5. 'r Asbestos Contractof; o �= C3 and the Division s of Occupational' f. NEWENGLAND,SURFACE MAINTENANCE,; . , 850'WASHINGTON STREET v .: Safety(DOS) a Name b.Address notification= " requirements of.453 WEYMOUTH � 02189 7813372117 tia CMR 6 12 ' '` c City/Town d Zi Code a Telephone"Number l f DQS=License'Number 9 Contrac tType:A ❑Wntten Kvetbl h:Faali " Contact Person• L Contact Person's Title PAUL W BROWN A9061945: 6 `,a.Narrie.of.On=Sde Su"ervisor/Foreman b.Su ervisor/Foreman DOS Certification Number 7 ".a':Name of Pro kt1Monitor b.Pro ect Monitor.DDS Certification Number. 8. --i 'NbmeofAsbIestosAnalytical1ab b.Asbestos Analvticali Lab DOS Certification Number 11/29/20"10 11/*2640 � - 0 9' a.Pro ect Start Date mm/ddl b..End Date(mm/ddlY�y) —0 8-4 .. .._� N c Work hours Mon-Fri. d.Work hours Sat-Sun. �o "110. a..What type of project is this? ❑ Demolition ❑ Renovation ❑✓ Repair ❑Other,please specify: b.Describe .11. 'a. Check abatement procedures: ❑}Glove bag' ❑ Encapsulation . o ❑;Enclosure ❑✓ Disposal only ❑ Cleanup : . Other, specify isV. ❑ 5s Full containment b Descnbe iz -- 12.' Is the b being"conducted:- ❑jlndoors� " Outdoors?` -��Q , �s Wan •10/02 Asbestos Notification Form•Page.1 of.3 Commonwealth of Massachusetts ■ . 1100116581 Asbestos Notification Form ANF-001 Decal"umber A. Asbestos Abatement Description (Coot:) 13. Total amount of each type of Asbestos Containing Materials(ACM)to be removed, enclosed, or encapsulated: —®_0 a.Total pipes or ducts(linear ft) b.Tooter erth�sur aces square c.Boiler,breaching,duct,tank C� d.Insulating cement surface coatings Lin.ft. Sq.ft. (Lin.ft. j Sq.ft. e.Corrugated or layered paper f.Trowel/Sprayer coatings L�J pipe insulation Lin.ft. Sq.ft. Lin.ft. Sq.ft. g.Spray-on fireproofing h.Transiteboard,wall board F Lin.ft. Sq.ft. Lin.ft. S i.Cloths,woven fabrics j.Other,please specify: 30 �� - Lin.ft. S .ft. Lin.ft. k:.Thermal,solid core pipe TRANSITS PIPE.; insulation, Lin:ft. Sq.ft. I.Specify A.A. 11��a..:L� al-'�;.J��-_.-i: �\1� 19: Llesc: VC UIC UGI:V 11W11111IdlIVII jy0=111i, LV UG used.. - AS REQUIRED 1.5:"Describe'the:containerization/disposal methods:to comply with 310 CMR 7:15'and 453 GMR (g) AS REQUIRED 16. For.Emergency Asbestos Operations, the<DEP and DOS:officlals who evaluated the emergency: a:-Name of DEP.Official b Title . m /dd! of Date( m Authorization d;DEP Waiver# - ) . . e Name,of DOS."Official". f:DO, Official:Tit e �N 'g.'Date:(mm/dd/yyyy)of Authorization N DOS Waiver# �0 17.;Do prevailing.wage rates as per;M.G.L. c. 149, §26, 27 or 27X—F apply to this project? ❑Yes No. B. a. i'lity Descriptions �N =o 1. Current or prior use.of facility: RESIDENCE �o 2.` is the facility owner-occupied residential with 4 units or less? []✓ Yes No 3 SAME a.Facility Owner Name b.Address o c.City/Town d.Zip Code ie.Telephone Number(area code and extension) �Z 4' a.Name of FacilityOwner's On-Site Manager b.On-Site Manager Ad.dress �Q C.Cityrrom d.Zip Code e.Telephone Number(area code and extension) ■ anf001ap.doc•10/02 Asbestos Notification Form:•Pa e 2 of 3-■ Commonwealth of Massachusetts 100116581 Decal Number Asbestos Notification Form ANF-001 B. Facility Description,(cont.) 5. a.Name of General Contractor b.Address c.City/Town d.Zip Code e.Telephone Number area code and extension f.Contractor's Worker's Comp.Insurer Policy Number h.6cp:Date mm/dd 6. What is the size of this facility? a.Square Feet b.Number of floors C. Asbestos Transportation and Disposal 1. Transporter of asbestos-containing material from,site to temporary storage site(if necessary): NESM LLP • Note:Transfer a.Name of Transporter b..Address Stations must comply witri the c:City/Town d.Zip;Code e.Telep hone'Number Solid'.Waste :Division . 2. `Transporter of asbestos-containing waste material from removal/temporary site to final disposal site: Regulations,310 cMR 1s o00; RED TECHNOLOGIES. (a'Name'of Transporter b.Atldress 71 c.Ci `/Town d.Zi "Code e.Telephone Number a Refuse Transfer Station and Owner. b.Address c.Ci /Town d.Zip, :Code e.Tele hone'.Number. . 4 , MINERVA'ENTERPRISES:INC a.Final`Dis osat>Site Location Name b,FinaLDis o§al Site'Location Owner's Name 9000 MINERVA ROAD WAYNESBURG C.FinaI Di§ osaI.Site:Address d Ci /town OH 44668 e.State f.Zip Code g.Telephone Number. D..certification �N The undersigned hereby states, under the KEN FURTNEY �0 penalties of perjury,that he/she has read the a.Name b.Authorized Signature �o Commonwealth of Massachusetts regulations 11112/2010 for the Removal,Containment or c.Position/Title d.Date(mm/dd/ww) Encapsulation of Asbestos,453 CMR 6.00 and �—— I— 310 CMR 7.15,and that the information I contained in this notification is true and correct e.Telephone Number f.Re resenfin c) to the'best.'of his/her knowledge and belief. o Address - h.Cityrrown i.Zip Code �Z .. Q . .. M anf001ap.doc•10102 Asbestos Notificatiorr:Form•_Page3 of3 a` ,xs 1 Town of Barnstable r# Departinent of Regulatory Services ��� • �'� s �►�""' i Public He alth D>lv>ision Date ,® MASS 200 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Fp .Date Scheduled I v Time Fee Pd. —� Soil Suitability Assessment or Sewage ' f ge Disposal Performed.By: . Witnessed By: LOCATION& GENERAL INFORMATION Location Address (o PC.�aQ�.�J1 �A� Owner's Name Address Assessor's Map/Parcel: '� ?�, p 2 �� 1 Engineer's Name �� NEW CONSTRUCTION �V/ REPAIR &. 11>�, Telephone# Land Use i Slopes("0) Surface Stones Distances from: Open Water Body' It Possible Wet.Area O _ft Drinking Water well �ft Drainage Way'�ft Property Line.: _ft Other ft SKETCH:(Street name,dimensions of lot,exact locations ofaest holes&perc tests,locate wetlands i`n proximity to holes) 371 . r n` lie/ 8� °V Parent material(geo !mac) a Depth to Bedrock Depth to Groundwater Standin Water in Hole: o - :. Wee fhom:Ptt Face Estimated Seasonal High Oroimdwater DETERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH'VVA;TER TABLE Method Used: �Jtr�� �� . Depth Observed standing in obs.hole: Depth to weeping from side of obs.hole 1n, Depth to sail mattlesc In. Index Well# ReadingDate: In, Groundwater AdJustment B index Wellle4el�_' Adj.11hctor Adj.droundwater Level ,�,o PERCOLATION TEST Date �l'o1e o Observation Hole# ---�-�•. 'lime at 9" Depth ofPerc t1 '3'2,t `C T7me at 6" Start Pre-soak Time @ l 0 1 D n Time(9"•6") �_ I End Pre-soak. r. . e . — Ll �� 7v Rate MinJlnch 1e�_ L. 2- ' y Site Suitability As Site Pa Site Failed: Additional Testing Needed(YIN) OriginaE Public Health Division Observation Hole Data To Be Completed on Back- _-------- f • - _ ***If percolation test is to be conducted within 1 100'of wetland,you must first notify the, Barnstable Co iservation Division,at least one(1)week priorto beginning. Q:1S9P7 MERCFORM.DOC DEEP.OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole.# Soil Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Mottling' ,(Structure,Stones;Boulders. Surface(in.) (USDA) (Ivlunsell) o ' t it DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# Soil, ther Depth from Soil Horizon SO] Texture Soil ns ell) Mottling Structure;Stones,Boulders. Surface(in.) (USDA) (iv[urisell) g _ �. 5 • , -1,�: sip. az�aa 51 DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole Other Soa Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Shun ell Mottling ;(Structure,Stones,Boulders. Surface(in.) (USDA) ( ) to DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# Soil ther Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Mottling (Structure,Stones:Boulders. Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) o ' i - ®!, �. �5 1 (0 r Flood Insurance Rate Mau: • Above 500 year flood boundary No_ Yes 0 ^' Within 500 year boundary No_ Yes..._._ o V { Within 100 year flood boundary No_. Yes d r . De Depth of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervio s material exist in all areas observed throw ut theCo 8 J u area proposed for the soil absorption system? -� Li not,what is the depth of naturally occurring pear ous material? Certification • that on 3� (date)I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved y the N I certify t performed ti me co' sistent with Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was Y exper a and experience described in 310 CUR 15.017. the required training. Date 2 Signature Q:\SEpncWERCFORM.DOC COMMONWEALTH OF'MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TITLE 5 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM-NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL.SYSTEM FORM PART A CERTIFICATION Property Address: 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit,MA 026350 Owner's Name: - Carol Medinger,Janet Hurd, .14 Owner's.Address: and Frank Woodward Date of Inspection: April 4, 2007 ' Name of Inspector: (Please Print)James M.Ford. Company Name:. James M.Ford Mailing Address: P.O.Box 49 Ostervllle,AM 02655-0049 Telephone Number: (508)862-9400 CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify that I have personally inspected the sewage disposal system at this address and that the inform tion repced �= below is true,accurate and complete as of the time of the inspection. The inspection was performed ba ed on.mm training and experience in the proper function and maintenance of on site sewage disposal systems. III a DEPt approved system inspector pursuant to Section 15.340 of Title 5(310 CMR 15.000). The system ✓ :'Passes Conditionally Passes eds Further Evaluation by the Local Approving Authority CY to F is Inspector's Signature: Date: April8, 2007 The system inspector shall sub4 a copy of this inspection report to the Approving Authority(Board of Health or DEP)within 30 days of completing.this inspection. If the system is a shared system or has a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater,the inspector and the system owner shall submit the report to the appropriate regional.office of the DER The original should be sent to the system owner and copies:sent to the buyer,if applicable,and the approving authority. Notes and Comments ****This report only describes:conditions at the time of inspection and under the conditions of use at that time. This inspection does not address how the system will perform in the future under the same or different conditions of use. Title.5 Inspection Form 6/15/2000 page 1 Page 2 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM-NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART A CERTIFICATION.(continued) Property Address: 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit, AM Owner: C.Medinzer,J.Hurd&F. Woodward Date of Inspection: April 4, 2007 Inspection Summary: Check A,B,C,D or E/ALWAYS complete all of Section D A. System Passes: ✓ I have not found any information which indicates that any of the failure criteria described in 310 CMR 15.303 or in 310 CMR 15.304 exist. Any failure criteria not evaluated are indicated below.. Comments: B. System Conditionally Passes: One or more system components as described in the"Conditional Pass"section need to be replaced or repaired. The system,upon completion of the replacement or repair,as approved by the Board of Health,will pass. Answer yes,no or not determined(Y,N,ND)in the for the following statements. If"not determined",please explain. The septic tank is metal and over 20 years old*or the septic tank(whether metal or not)is structurally unsound,exhibits substantial infiltration or exfiltration or tank failure is imminent. System will pass inspection if the existing tank is replaced with a complying septic tank as approved by the Board of Health. *A metal septic tank will pass inspection if it is structurally sound,not leaking and if a Certificate of Compliance indicating that the tank is less than 20 years old is available. ND explain: Observation of sewage backup or break out or high static water level in the distribution box due to broken or obstructed pipe(s)or due to a broken,settled or uneven distribution box. System will pass inspection if (with approval of Board of Health): broken pipe(s)are replaced obstruction is removed distribution box is leveled or replaced ND explain: The system required pumping more than 4 times a year due to broken or obstructed pipe(s). The system will pass inspection if(with approval of the Board of Health): broken pipe(s)are replaced obstruction is removed ND explain: 2 Page 3 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM-NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART A CERTIFICATION (continued) Property Address: 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit, AM Owner: C.Medinzer,J. Hurd&F. Woodward Date of Inspection: April 4, 2007 C. Further Evaluation is Required by the Board of Health: Conditions exist which require further evaluation by the Board of Health in order to determine if the system is failing to protect public health,safety or the environment. 1. System will pass unless Board of Health determines in accordance with 310 CAM 15.303(1)(b)that the system is not functioning in a manner which will protect public health,safety and the environment: Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a surface water Cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a bordering vegetated wetland or a salt marsh' 2. System will fail unless the Board of Health(and Public Water Supplier,if any)determines that the system is functioning in a manner that protects the public health,safety and environment: The system has a septic tank and soil absorption system(SAS)and the SAS is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or tributary to a surface water supply. The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is within a Zone 1 of a public water supply. The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is within 50 feet of a private water supply well. The system has a septic tank and SAS and the SAS is less than 100 feet but 50 feet or more from a private water supply well". Method used to determine distance "This system passes if the well water analysis,performed at a DEP certified laboratory, for coliform bacteria and volatile organic compounds indicates that the well is free from pollution from that facility and the presence of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less than 5 ppm,provided that no other failure criteria are triggered. A copy of the analysis must be attached to this form. 3. Other: 3 Page 4 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM-NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART A CERTIFICATION (continued) Property Address: 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit, AM Owner: C.Medinger,J. Hurd&F. Woodward Date of Inspection: April 4.2007 D. System Failure Criteria applicable to all systems: You must indicate either"yes"or"no"to each of the following for all inspections: Yes No ✓ Backup of sewage into facility or system component due to overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool ✓ Discharge or ponding of effluent to the surface of the ground or surface waters due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool ✓ Static liquid level in the distribution box above outlet invert due to an overloaded or clogged SAS or cesspool _ ✓ Liquid depth in cesspool is less than 6"below invert or available volume is less than'/z day flow ✓ Required pumping more than 4 times in the last year NOT due.to clogged or obstructed pipe(s). Number of times pumped— ✓ Any portion of the SAS,cesspool or privy is below high ground water elevation. Any portion of cesspool or privy is within 100 feet of a surface water supply or tributary to a surface water supply. ✓ Any,portion of a cesspool or privy is within a Zone I of a public well. ✓ Any portion of a cesspool or privy is within 50 feet of a private water supply well. ✓ Any portion of a cesspool or privy is less than 100.feet but greater than 50 feet from a private water supply well with no acceptable water quality analysis. [This system passes if the well water analysis, performed at a DEP certified laboratory,for coliform bacteria and volatile organic compounds indicates that the well is free from pollution from that facility and the presence of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen is equal to or less than 5 ppm,provided that no other failure criteria are triggered. A copy of the analysis must be attached to this form.]. No (Yes/No)The system fails. I have determined that one or more of the above failure criteria exist as described in 310 CMR 15.303,therefore the system fails. The system owner should contact the Board of Health to determine what will be necessary to correct the failure. E. Large System: To be considered a large system the system must serve a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd to 15,000 gpd• You must indicate either"yes"or"no"to each of the following: (The following criteria apply to large systems in addition to the criteria above) Yes No the system is within 400 feet of a surface drinking water supply the system is within 200 feet of a tributary to a surface drinking water supply _ the system is located in a nitrogen sensitive area(Interim Wellhead Protection Area-IWPA)or a mapped Zone II of a public water supply well If you have answered`yes"to any question in Section E the system is considered a significant threat,or answered "yes"in Section D above the large system has failed. The owner or operator of any large system considered a significant threat under Section E or failed under Section D shall upgrade the system in accordance with 310 CMR " 15.304. The system owner should contact the appropriate regional office of the Department. 4 Page 5 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART B CHECKLIST Property Address: 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit,MA Owner: C.Medinger,J.Hurd&F. Woodward Date of Inspection: April 4, 2007 Check if the following have been done: You must indicate"yes"or"no"as to each of the following: Yes No ✓ Pumping information was provided by the owner,occupant,or Board of Health ✓ Were any of the system components pumped out in the previous two weeks? ✓ Has the system received normal flows in the previous two week period? ✓ Have large volumes of water been introduced to the system recently or as part of this inspection? n/a Were as built plans of the system obtained and examined?(If they were not available note as N/A) ✓ Was the facility or dwelling,inspected for signs of sewage back up? ✓ _ Was the site inspected for signs of break out? ✓ _ Were all system components,excluding the SAS,located on site? ✓ _ Were the septic tank manholes uncovered,opened,and the interior of the tank inspected for the condition of the baffles or tees,material of construction,dimensions,.depth of liquid,depth of sludge and depth of scum? ✓ _ Was the facility owner(and occupants if different from owner)provided with information on the proper maintenance of subsurface sewage disposal systems? The size and location of the Soil Absorption System(SAS)on the site has been determined based on: Yes No ✓ _ Existing information. For example,a plan at the Board of Health. ✓ _ Determined in the field(if any of the failure criteria related to Part C is at issue approximation of distance is unacceptable)[310 CMR 15.302(3)(b)]. 5 Page 6 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM-NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION Property Address: 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit,MA Owner: C.Medinger,J.Hurd&F. Woodward Date of Inspection: April 4. 2007 FLOW CONDITIONS RESIDENTIAL Number of bedrooms(design): n/a Number of bedrooms(actual): 4 DESIGN flow based on 310 CMR 15.203 (for example: 110 gpd x#of bedrooms): 440 Number of current residents: 0 Does residence have a garbage grinder(yes or no): Yes e Is laundry on a separate sewage system(yes or no): n/a [if yes separate inspection required] Laundry system inspected(yes or no): No' Seasonal use(yes or no): Yes Water meter readings,if available(last 2 years usage(gpd)): Unavailable Sump Pump(yes or no): No Last date of occupancy: Summer and weekend use COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL Type of establishment: Design flow(based on 310 CMR 15.203): _______gpd Basis of design flow(seats/persons/sgft,etc.): Grease trap present(yes or no): Industrial waste holding tank present(yes or no) Non-sanitary waste discharged to the Title 5-system(yes or no): Water meter readings,if available: Last date of occupancy/use: OTHER(describe): GENERAL INFORMATION Pumping Records Source of information: Unavailable Was system pumped as part of the inspection(yes or no): No If yes,volume pumped: __gallons--How was quantity pumped determined? Reason for pumping: TYPE OF SYSTEM Septic tank,distribution box,soil absorption system Single cesspool ✓ Overflow cesspool Privy Shared system(yes or no) (if yes,attach previous inspection records,if any) Innovative/Alternative technology.'Attach a copy of the current operationand:maintenance contract(to be obtained from system owner) Tight Tank Attach a copy of the DEP approval Other(describe): Approximate age of all components,date installed(if known)and source of information: Installed in approximately 1960s-per owner Were sewage odors detected when arriving at the site(yes or no): No 6 it • Page 7 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM-NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION(continued) Property Address: 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit,MA Owner: C.Medinger,J, Hurd&F, Woodward -Date of Inspection: April 4, 2007 BUILDING SEWER(locate on site plan) Depth below grade: Materials of construction: cast iron 40 PVC other(explain): Distance from private water supply well or suction line: Comments(on condition of joints,venting,evidence of leakage,etc.): SEPTIC TANK: ✓ (locate on site plan) (Cesspool acting as a septic tank) Depth below grade: 4"to cover Material of construction: concrete _metal _fiberglass _polyethylene ✓ other(explain) Cesspool block If tank is metal list age: Is age confirmed by a Certificate of Compliance(yes or no): (attach a copy of certificate) Dimensions: 6'W x 7'T x 9'bottom to grade Sludge depth: -- Distance from top of sludge to bottom of outlet tee or baffle: -- Scum thickness: Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffle: -- Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle: How were dimensions determined: Measuring stick Comments(on pumping recommendations,inlet and outlet tee or baffle condition;structural integrity,liquid levels, as related to outlet invert,evidence of leakage,etc.): The cesspool was dry, An outlet tee was present. The cover was 4"below grade. GREASE TRAP: None (locate on site plan) Depth below grade: Material of construction: _concrete _metal _fiberglass _polyethylene _other (explain): Dimensions: Scum thickness: Distance from top of scum to top of outlet tee or baffler Distance from bottom of scum to bottom of outlet tee or baffle: Date of last pumping: Comments(on pumping recommendations,inlet and outlet tee or baffle condition,structural integrity,liquid levels as related to outlet invert,evidence of leakage,etc.): . 7 -- I Page 8 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM-NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION(continued) Property Address: 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit,MA Owner: C.Medimer,J Hurd&F. Woodward Date of Inspection: April 4,2007 TIGHT or HOLDING TANK: None (tank must be pumped at time of inspection)(locate on site plan) Depth below grade: Material of construction: _concrete _metal _fiberglass _polyethylene _other(explain): Dimensions: Capacity: gallons Design Flow: eallons/day; Alarm present(yes or no): Alarm level: Alarm in working,order(yes or no): Date of last pumping: Comments(condition of alarm and float switches,etc.): DISTRIBUTION BOX: None (if present must be opened)(locate on site plan) Depth of liquid level above outlet invert: Comments(note if box is level and distribution to outlets equal,any evidence of solids carryover,any evidence of leakage into or out of box,etc.): PUMP CHAMBER: None (locate on site plan) Pumps in working order(yes or no): Alarms in working order(yes or no) Comments(note condition of pump chamber;condition of pumps and appurtenances,etc.): 8 --7 Page 9 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM-NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION(continued) Property Address: 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit,MA Owner: C.MedinQer.J. Hurd&F. Woodward Date of Inspection: April 4, 2007 SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM(SAS): ✓ (locate on site plan,excavation not required) If SAS not located explain why: Type leaching pits,number: leaching chambers,number: leaching galleries,number: leaching trenches,number,length: leaching fields,number,dimensions: ✓ overflow cesspool,number: 1- Innovative/alternative system Type/name of technology: Comments(note condition of soil,signs of hydraulic failure,level of ponding,damp soil,condition of vegetation, etc.): The overflow cesspool was 6'W x 8'T x 11'bottom to grade and was dry and clean There did not appear to be any signs of failure. The cover was 30"below grade. Recommend installing a riser to bring the cover closer to grade. Also recommend brush QrowinQ around the cesspools. CESSPOOLS: None (cesspool must be pumped as part of inspection)(locate on site plan) Number and configuration: Depth-top of liquid to inlet invert: Depth of solids layer: Depth of scum layer: Dimensions of cesspool: Materials of construction: Indication of groundwater inflow(yes or no): Comments (note condition of soil,signs of hydraulic failure,level of ponding,condition of vegetation,etc.): PRIVY: None (locate on site plan) Materials of construction: Dimensions: Depth of solids: Comments(note condition of soil,signs of hydraulic failure,level of ponding,condition of vegetation,etc.): 9 Page 10 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM-NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE.DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION(continued) Property Address: . 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit.'MA Owner: C.MedinQer,J.Hurd&F. Woodward Date of Inspection: April 4, 2007 SKETCH OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Provide a sketch of the sewage disposal system including ties to at least two permanent reference landmarks or benchmarks. Locate all wells within 100 feet. Locate where public water supply enters the building. f� B a y 3 35' a ys sa. 10 1 , �d Page 11 of 11 OFFICIAL INSPECTION FORM-NOT FOR VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSPECTION FORM PART C SYSTEM INFORMATION(continued) Property Address: 262 Ocean View Drive Cotuit, AM Owner: C.Medinger,J. Hurd&F. Woodward Date of Inspection: April 4, 2007 SITE EXAM Slope Surface water Check cellar Shallow wells Estimated depth to ground water 20+/- feet Please indicate(check)all methods used to determine the high ground water elevation: Obtained from system design plans on record-If checked,date of design plan reviewed: Observed site(abutting property/observation hole within ISO feet of SAS) ✓ Checked with local Board of Health-explain: topographic and water contours maps Checked with local excavators,installers-(attach documentation) Accessed USGS database-explain:. You must describe how you established the high ground water elevation; Using a Barnstable topographic map and a water contours map, the maps were showing approximately 20'+1-ground water at this site. This report has been prepared only for the septic system and components described herein; This septic system.has been inspected and passed as of the date of inspection. This report is not a warranty or guarantee that the system will function properly in the future. There have been no warranties or guarantees,either expressed,written or implied, relating to the septic system,the inspection,this report and/or any components of the septic system which have not been located and inspected. 11 I' EDGE OF PATIO TO t£ c . �' 'F � PROGRESS PRINTS • SUIMWTOCNAN=JUlIDALTER=W —— 'YMM ASSOCIATES,INC. NASHPEE wn. I DATE 9M 1fl0 I r� - - ---------- S CAR GARAGE r 23'x35' L J • ,� STONE PATIO , -- SPA AREA ---- -------------------- ---- I I PN ` L_j 1 I - . - - BREAKFAST - .. .; AREA O i GREAT ROOM ---------- Ib'9 xldd' 2gd'x2dd' SCREEN PORCH 13Tx17T I -- i ' I _ GARAGE FLOOR PLAN 0 \ .,. - - 2 • - • I —Y COVERED-DECK - SCALE I/q-I_d. DAVID'S �. _I2dx8'O T pl�r-Ns OFFICE I r -- KITCHEN p' .. ` .. •;Ii. I,��t l�a�,4IIi'�I�II .i.�i�i i�',. CI N"DYd'S' . w-1II o OFFICE sr LR-FJd GUEST BEDROOM RAO OM- --� Ll P or I 9x5 FTJ � � I`� - - iLAV � " ENTRY I — j t PANTRY LIBRARY 2 5x Y COVERED D w L_- Iadx1�¢'� FIRST FLOOR 3954 Sf DINING ROOM — LAUNDRY _ pT 171"xls'd`— _ SECOND FLOOR 2705 Sf -- a = TOTAL AREA 6659 Sf — — (NOT INCLUDING AREA OVER THE GARAGE ------ — , OR FINISHED SASENIENTAREA) COVERED PORCH-'__ DER HAGOPIAN RESIDENCE -- — — 262 OCEAN VIEW AVE. STORAGE CL BACK HALL COTUIT,MA yo w - rrEVl�v wH-O5 rrrEA�afr,�•�r,Irsr eaRaaa 76"x8'b — YAR®SH ASSOCIATES, INC. (:DFIRST FLOOR PLAN p'" ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS SCAM AK OATS 111, a IMMIRY: X �; FIRST FLOOR PLAN �` - t: . w - �vd �xo,Ie�r wmee NASFPEE°r14SS4CF4SETf5 auwirc nrmee 9. I I . I I • I I I I I � I I lz----- .. I • I I 8, PROGRESS PRINTS FUTURE SUBJECT TO CHARM MD ALTERAUM SPACEIALTERNATE IN YARDSH ASSOCIATM INC. MUSIC ROOM NAW I PRP/mE RgFit1-NS - DATE VIVID I FOR FUl.M h I FEATND , I _ I � I I _ I I READING ROOM — —� I'i'6uxI2.6•. ROB I I , O GREAT ROOM I I BELOW . I I - I I BATH I I . I' I I I W.I.CLOSET MASTER BEDROOM BEDROOM Ef ZCS"x168" IZ' 'xlb'd' ❑ b'H WNl. � ❑ OPEN RAL BEDROOM . SECOND FLOOR PLAN W. cLos. 2 LN ❑ ❑ MASTER BATH D OIN RAL EPN ❑n•Tns (HERS) _C. LIN ON �FRF?Y.H ORN RAL POOR5 41-i a auwaz5 �T BATH R BATH IS LINEN ¢ WJ.CLOSET. � SEATi LIBRARY N ¢ ¢ i BELOW I I, LAUNDRY ROOF FAL OPFN ' TV pdGKS. DER HAGOPIAN RESIDENCE 262 OCEAN VIEW AVE. COTUIT,MA • REVF..�5-o-W map"-M MAsTM ao.�Ts s MTH SECOND FLOOR PLAN A YAROSH ASSOCIATES. INC. Yq"=1'-d' ARCHrrECTS-PLANNERS I SCALE j' 6ULL.E A11 OA7B Ip-py APPWVM ORAMN BY: .L' PN SECOND FLOOR 2705 sf L_ SECOND FLOOR PLAN rarmee HASHME.HA55ACKMM onnmw manse ,s�.,�,- ..,m>, A—A r. - - M JZAZS a CD ,. .Y Pool- OPEN BASEMENT ' F OUTDOOR CaC&T R as wnlmff rm , 1P PATIO CAUM LAM a • K • R115TIG P05f5 GAME AREA I W"m aERs BAND AREA Upt BATH VINTAGE ENGUSH PUB PART DARTS 0000 d O F BASEMENT PLAN Lp PROPOSED FINISHED BASEMENT AREA= 1355 s.f. DER HAGOPIAN RESIDENCE • PROGRESS PRINTS 262 OCEAN VIEW AVE. COTUIT,MA re„ew,,Fe BWUMTOMMMAMALTERAT101O RtVIW 1�-"0"AMA N6RPEv YARMAMMM114C. fi YA OSH ASSOCIATES, INC. MAMPMMM& ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS ♦ IDATE8H1110 SME AK DATe W/o9 mpwra wAme* r .boa BASEMENT PLAN �� AMA ACHUSEB A f SCHOOL ST LOCUS INFORMATION SOIL TEST PIT DATA SOIL EVALUATION NOTES NOT TO SCALE N CURRENT OWNER: JANET HURD & DATE: JUNE 26. 2007 BLUFF POINT DR JAMES BARRETT TRS TEST PIT #1 TEST PIT _#2 TEST PIT #3 TEST PIT #4 TEST BY: S. DOYLE Sw TITLE REFERENCE: CERT. 166780 GRD. EL. 32.1 GRD. EL. 32.7 GRD. EL. 33.4 GRD. EL. 32.8 WITNESSED BY: DONNA MIORANDI, R.S. 21.1 21.7 22.4 21.8 PERC. RATE: < 2 MIN./INCH 2 Q SHGW EL. SHGW EL. SHGW EL. SHGW EL. •� �'� PLAN REFERENCE: L.C. 6713-8 A A A A SOIL EVALUATOR: S. DOYLE BOOK 37, PAGE 65 SANDY LOAM SANDY LOAM SANDY LOAM SANDY LOAM 10YR 3/2 8" 10YR 3/2 8" 10YR 3/2 8' 10YR 3/2 SOIL CLASS. CLASS I ASSESSORS MAP: 33 8» PARCEL: 2 L.T.A.R.: 0.74 GPD LOCUS SAMPSON ISLAND LOAMY SAND LOAMY SAND LOAMY B SAND LOAMY SAND GPD/S.F. ZONING DISTRICT: RF 10YR 5/8 10YR 5/8 10YR 5/8 toYR 5/8 SETBACKS: FRONT 30' (DOC. #3056) 24 24 24 24 SIDE 15' " • REAR 15' LEGEND RESTRICTION: FRONT 100' (SEE DOC. #3056) NANTUCKET SOUND • 17777/71 UNSUITABLE MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 87,120 S.F. C C C C MATERIALS FlNE SAND FlNE SAND FINE SAND FlNE SAND TO BE REMOVED EXISTING LOT AREA: 75,360t S.F. TOTAL < 5YCOB COBBLES < 2 5Y BB S < 2.5YCOBBLES < X COBBLES ( ) y, "-IH OFkq 73,130f S.F. UPLANDBoa eft G. OVERLAY DISTRICT. RESOURCE PROTECTION PERCOLATON o Y RGATIAN _ (NOT IN A ZONE II) TEST RANGE CIVIL � LOCUS PLAN FEMA FLOOD 90 9�014s a NOT TO SCALE ZONE DISTRICT: ZONE C. A13, Al 1. V17 - 132» - 132- - 132" = 132" ESTIMATED Fss�o PANEL #25001 0018 D - - SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER NO REDOXIMORPHIC FEATURES NO REDOXIMORPHIC FEATURES NO REDOXIMORPHIC FEATURES NO REDOXIMORPHIC FEATURES OR GROUNDWATER OBSERVED OR GROUNDWATER OBSERVED OR GROUNDWATER OBSERVED OR GROUNDWATER OBSE;t?VED �_ OBSERVED GROUNDWATER NOTES � C c BRIAN G. YERGATIAN DATE GENERAL I y 0�C PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 1. THIS PLAN IN ONLY INTENDED FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SEWAGE LQLlL LOT 12 DISPOSAL FACILITY. VIRGINIA BUSH TR. DANIEL B.�CLOTTI & ASSESSORS MAP 33 PETER GEN TR. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO 310 CMR 15.000 AND PARCEL 3-2 ASSESSORS MAP 33 YARMOUTH BOARD OF HEALTH REGULATIONS. PARCEL 3-1 : � DER HAGOPIAN INSTALL (5) 500 GAL `... CHAMBERS LEACHING ;:.� LOT 13 RESIDENCE 3. THERE ARE NO KNOWN OR PROPOSED PRIVATE WELLS LOCATED. WITHIN 150 FT. OF THE . PROPOSED LEACHING FACILITY. CB, I �TIDpSC I F4°H D 4. IF AN OVERDIG IS SPECIFIED, REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL, SUBSOIL AND OTHER UNSUITABLE AND HELD CB/DH 572.17'25"E 248.00' ND HE J MATERIALS. 100.0 --"� :� TCB 5 M -, 2 :'.;I 262 OCEAN VIEW AVENUE 5. IF AN OVERDIG IS SPECIFIED, REPLACE ALL EXCAVATED MATERIALS WITHIN THE LIMIT OF 13.8 EXCAVATION WITH CLEAN GRANULAR SAND, FREE FROM ORGANIC MATERIAL AND BENCH MARK B ILDI SETBACK LI I ( (n .;I IN BRASS DISK SET IN INSPECTION / ° DELETRIOUS SUBSTANCES. MIXTURES AND LAYERS OF DIFFERENT CLASSES OF SOIL CONCRETE MONUMNET SHALL NOT BE USED. FILL SHALL NOT CONTAIN ANY MATERIAL LARGER THAN 2 ELEV.- 2s.7s (NGw) PORT / \ JANET HU D ac I ` 2q : ( COTUIT I -- ; INCHES. A SIEVE ANALYSIS USING A #4 SIEVE SHALL BE PERFORMED ON A x W.5 ^a" "6+ JAMES BARR TRS I w M M TP-4 ASSESSORS 33 ' REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF FILL. UP TO 45% BY WEIGHT MAY BE RETAINED ON THE #4 RESERVE AREA 1 ` 3- GARAGE / " GAS PARCEL 2 MASSACHUSETTS 24 MAPLE 73130tS.F. UP ND, SIEVE. SUCH ANALYSES MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT THE MATERIAL MEETS EACH OF THE DB s�B EL.=35.5o METER I ( APuNSTABLE COUNTY) FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: . - �?� x 3z � ;, : : a :' S�F. TO AL I � I �• '-' 100% MUST PASS #4 SIEVE EDGE OF STONE 35.9 X m I _ _ - --- 28 --� 1 10% MUST PASS #50 SIEVE N73'39 5 \ cn / . 5' W TM 4 y .., x 4.6 �, / I SEWAGE DISPOSAL 0-20% MUST PASS #100 SIEVE LAM �. w ( o , ` . 3.50' 0-5% MUST PASS #200 SIEVE ° C / o �, f SYSTEM UPGRADE 6. EXISTING UTILITIES WHERE SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE ENGINEER �, Ndn DOES NOT GUARANTEE THEIR ACCURACY OR THAT ALL SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES ARE j N o I o / m I JUNE 18, 2010 SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SIZE, LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF INVERTS EC w x 35.9 � y/ / OF UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES, WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK, PRIOR TO THE START OF O M o / f J 26 CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED OR FIELD CHANGES REQUIRED, I 1,500 'GAL ONE STORY m / THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. s C TANK' WOOD FRAME C ,/ t HOUSE #262 ° m /18" PINE I ' LOT 3 f TOF=36.51 25 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPERLY COORDINATING THE PROPOSED N/F 34.5 �S .� / �--- / LOT 2 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH DIG-SAFE AND THE APPLICABLE UTILITY COMPANIES, AND EUZABETH AUSTIN TR. ;:\ PROPOSED m 1 / / : ' / I N/F ASSESSORS MAP 33 \ 6-BEDROOM NG I RE9T�ICTED AREA 1 JANET HURD & SHALL COMPLETE THE PROPOSED WORK WITHOUT ANY INTERUPTIONS IN SERVICE. PARCEL t I' :`� 1 \ �'. F.F.E. ; y s-s�fowN oN Lc. s71 B ®WG JAMEs BARRETT TRs ? \ f �" PINfF�' / r �24 T 3 ASSESSORS MAP 33 NO. DATE DESC. 8. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO NOTIFY DIG-SAFE, PER MASS. STATUTE CHAPTER 82, z / 4`-i / I PARCEL 20 SECTION 4 1- - - �.............. .\ ' 0 ( 888 344 7233) A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF � STONE,,PATIo -''" � � z CONSTRUCTION. m • • \\\ R BUFFER � !�- „_...,�--- 23 \ / - - o ' ' \ 9 AL BANK 3B 9. THIS SYSTEM IS NOT DESIGNED FOR THE USE OF A GARBAGE GRINDER. INSTALLATION w �` - �. �\� \ \ To C 3.2� OR USE OF A GARBAGE GRINDER AT THIS PROPERTY IS NOT ALLOWED PER 310 CMR - \.•' '.. \ \\� \ _ /' • 79�- - ` Q 22 15.240(4). , 2� 21 N -+ STONE 4i 8. 26 0• z AMP. -�.�`7W-27:0 \ PATIO ' \ I Oo c .• \ 1 'F.E-26.5 / \. 28 25 20 I DESIGN CALCULATIONS e� ,� \� ,24 r,' A. 23 \`%' ""� �. "- ____ �� P •: : ON /, 22 _' '-SUFFER TO --�- -_ 19 TCB 2 THE TOWN OF BARNSTABLE REQUIRES `� ~' 5° `� ,.� _ ��cEssP - ---:_ •• { � DESIGN FLOW: `` r So' o� �. . - 21 0 AS-BUILT CERTIFICATION. THE SOIL ```�� PREPARED FOR: 6 BEDROOMS 0 110 GPD/BDRM = 660 GPD EVALUATOR SHALL INSPECT BOTTOM OF �. . 20 . /t ` TAL _,• / _CESSo 1g DAVID DER HAGOPIAN EXCAVATION PRIOR lO ANY INSTALLATION \ . --� �� _ -! ��C ___- F ____ __- I 1900 SUMMIT TOWER BLVD. REQUIRED SEPTIC TANK: AND ALSO PRIOR TO FINAL BACKFILLING. - � \ :�__.. �'' •�-- � 20�_-� r� -- wmi m�tE 1$ -- 'moo _ � _„r,... - 17 SUITE 900 660 GALLONS X 200% - 1,320 GALLONS �„ ; 1s -�- -�-" y _ _-- �-' 17 ( 1 ORLANDO, FL 32810 SEPTIC TANK PROVIDED = 1,500 GALLONS So, _.. �� ''� -.�` '" -'-�: -- -- 18 -- � - --"" _- 1s - --- ____ -- CKDH l'z . `• __.__ Q����' 15 •�NDS ____ ____ 16 - .--- - --- 14 --' SIZE OF LEACHING FACILITY REQUIRED: •� '� ' ...-- stab I. DESIGN PERC. RATE: < 2 MIN/INCH ` ' . �` �` .� BSC . -� 14 _- _-- t`" 1' `o BU�Ro pS.` 349 Route 28, Unit D LONG TERM APPL. RATE: 0.74 GPD S.F. \ _ TO OF zCoASTAL \ - / royl,F�io Ion f _ - - 13 Z01,,E cam.. -- 11 - BANK `\ �` I :. 1� . TCB W. Yarmouth, Massachusetts 660 GPD _ 0.74 GPD/SF - 892 S.F. 11 C 1'1�, _ ENV.-12) C -'' 'y �"` �``� \ r- 1 / 02673 ' f�` 12 ( - _�_ CKDD -- - 10 -'t r __ 508 778 8919 SIZE OF LEACHING FACILITY PROVIDED: �--- N \ �� USE (5) 500 GALLON CONCRETE CHAMBERS DAT M ` �/` LAMP ���.+c.�-� __ _.. 10 x -- _ __- 8 _.� © 2010 BSC Group, Inc. �'•' SCALE: 1 20 SIDEWALL AREA = 2(50.5' + 12.83') X 2 = 254 S.F. BOTTOM AREA = 50.5' X 12.83' = 648 S.F. VERTICAL DATUM: N.G.V.D. 1929 iiia PLAN V E VV 0 10 20 40 Fw 902 S.F. �.._.,_ BENCH MARK: BRASS DISK SET IN CONCRETE MONUMENT SCALE: 1" = 20 FEET FILE:P-\prj\493M\Civil\_Drawings\493P -SP.dwq Y, 902 S.F. X 0.74 GPD/S.F. = 667 GPD EL. 29.79 11111101 DWG. NO: SHEET 1 OF 2 0 10 20 40 FT. JOB. NO: 49385-00 I 1 ,500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK (H- 20) DISTRIBUTION BOX DETAIL H-10 500 GALLON LEACHING CHAMBER (H--20� NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE REMOV* ABLE 300 5" DIA. KNOCKOUT (TYP.) NOTE 2 WALLS COVER S. F 1. SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE. MIN. 20" DIA. COVER, TYP. ; ,.: ,• ; �, 1. ONE ACCESS COVER PER 2. SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING H-20 RAISE (2) TO WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED Q p Q Q Q Q Q C� 0 p SYSTEM SHALL BE RAISED TO FINISH GRADE. LOADING. GRADE USING SEWER BRICK AND p Q Q Q Q p Q Q Q p Q 3. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS AND CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION MORTAR AS NECESSARY 9-1/2» O O Q Q Q Q Q Q Q p Q Q Q 2. CHAMBERS SHALL BE SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. 4. TEES SHALL BE SCH. 40 PVC AND SHALL BE LOCATED NO Q Q Q Q Q Q Q p Q 0 p 500 GALLON LEACHING WITHIN 12" OF TANK WALL AND ACCESSIBLE FROM TANK 6` MAX 11-1/2. DRYWELL. MANUFACTURED COVER. . 1. DIST. BOX TO WITHSTAND H-10 LOADING Q Q Q p 0 p Q Q Q p p BY SHOREY OR APPROVED E5. FILL ALL UNUSED KNOCKOUTS WITH MORTAR. UNLESS UNDER PAVEMENT, DRIVES OR EQUAL 6. IF NO PORTION OF THE GROUND SURFACE ABOVE » TRAVELED WAYS WHEREIN H-20 LOADING TANK WILL BE SUBJECT TO VEHICLE LOADS, AN H-10 6" 2 BOTTOM ON LEVEL SHALL APPLY. 8.—g» SEPTIC TANK MAY BE USED. • •. ••• •.•.•• STABLE BASE g� MINIMUM 2 PROVIDE INLET TEE OR BAFFLE WHERE (— 12-36" COVER OBSERVATION LOAM AND SEED » V*A SECTION VIEW 3/4" TO 1-1/2" SLOPE OF PIPE EXCEEDS 0.08 FT./FT OR PORT ALL DISTURBED AREAS 11 —0 _ CRUSHED STONE IN PUMPED SYSTEM. » 10'-0" 10 3" Ile3. FIRST BOX TO @E FEET LAID�E OUT OF DIST. 1 rl 1 2' LAYER OF 1/8' Tb 4'-1` / 1/2" DOUBLE WASHED PRECAST SEPTIC TANK UQUID DEPTH 6'-0' 4. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS AND CONCRETE -�-- Q Q STONE ABOVE CROWN ZN OF MqS (SHOREY OR APPROVED EQUAL) 4'_g" e. LOCATE , L(5) 5` DIA. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. w p p p Q Q OF PIPE INLET TEE - 36 24 •1e 9"N G. 6'-2" UNDER COVER 9 * ELBOW 'f 13 KNOCKOUTS 5. FILL ALL UNUSED KNOCKOUTS WITH Q Q Q Q Q TO _ • MORTAR. CIVIL 6 TYP. DEPTH / DOUBLE WASHED STONE o YERGATIAN c g » p 0 Q Q Q 6. CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE RAISED TO O Q C� L7 Q TO CROWN OF PIPE ,09 p No 46206 0 WITHIN 6 INCHES OF FINISHED GRADE. SS/ sT G� �—21•—� 4'-10" * GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE 6" MINIMUM 12'-10" USED IN LIEU OF PEASTONE PLAN VIEW 3/4" To 1-1/2" CROSS—SECTION VIEW PLAN MEW CRUSHED STONE CROSS—SECTION (0 BRIAN G. YERGATIAN DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SCHEDULE OF ELEVATIONS SYSTEM PROFILE DER HAGOPIAN NOT TO SCALE RESIDENCE TOP OF FOUNDATION 36.20 A 4' SCH. 40 PVC 4" INVERT AT BUILDING 31.55 B (EXISTING) TOP S-0.019' TOP FOUNDATION 4" INVERT AT SEPTIC TANK (IN) 31.05 C (EXISTING) FIRST PIPE LENGTH 4" INVERT AT SEPTIC TANK (OUT) 30.80 D EL.=35.5f 4" SCH. 40 PVC TO BE SET LEVEL 262 OCEAN VIEW AVENUE L-20 FT. FOR MIN. 2 FINISH GRADE 4" INVERT AT DIST. BOX (IN) 29.87 E s=o.o25 EL.=32.5-34.0 4" PVC SCH 40 IN 4" INVERT AT DIST. BOX (OUT) 29.70 F . LEACHING CHAMBER COTUIT Ul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INVERTS AT LEACHING FACILITY: 1=B I=° I=G o 0 c o 0 0 0 o c o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o MAS SACH U S ETTS ` I=C I=E I=F H_ 4" INV. AT LEACHING CHAMBER 29.50 G (BREAKOUT 30.50) :r 5 OUTLET (BARNSTABLE COUNTY) ' ' � t ELEVATION AT BOTTOM OF ,^HAMBER_ 27.50 H SEPTIC TANK D-B X 5.1 SEPARATION SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER 22.40 J J EST. HIGH GROUNDWATER NO SEWAGE DISPOSAL. MAGNETIC REFLECTIVE TAPE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE TRENCH bVER ALL PVC PIPING SYSTEM UPGRADE JUNE 18, 2010 NO. DATE DESC. PREPARED FOR: DAVID DER HAGOPIAN 1900 SUMMIT TOWER BLVD. SUITE 900 ORLANDO, FL 32810 BSC ROUE' 349 Route 28, Unit D W. Yarmouth, Massachusetts 02673 508 778 8919 © 2010 BSC Group, Inc. SCALE: 1" = 20' NOMEMINI 0 10 20 40 Fw FILE:P:\prj\493M\Civil\—Drawings\493M—SP.dwg DWG. N0: SHEET 2 0F• 2 JOB. NO: 49385.00 NOTES: 1.) TOPOGRAPHY FOR LOT 1 BASED ON EXISTING PLAN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE-NEW DWELLING. 2.) TOPOGRAPHY ON LOT 2 BASED ON A CURRENT FIELD SURVEY IN JULY OF 2011 3.) COASTAL DUNE ON LOT 2 DELINEATED BY OTHERS. t, EXISTING PIER n UP LQj 11 Oj 1 VIRGINIA NV BUSH TR. DANIEL B.CLOTTI & LOT 13 ASSESSORS MAP 33 PETER GEN TR. ]lL2'1 PARCEL 3-2 ASSESSORS MAP 33 N/F PARCEL 3-1 RICHARD BENDETSON I••. v 0 ASSESSORS MAP 33 jPARCEL 019-001Q ZWCB/DISC CB/DISC B/DHSTAKE & NAILND FND FNDAND HELD CB/DH AND HEL 5`E.. ` TCB 5 `? a 3. 3,�.17 25 E 248.00FND S72 7SET. y X 32 2 c COASTAL DUNE s f Ui 1BUILDING SETBACK LINE i) s. m I N NI s CRAIG A. FIELD DATE <` z PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR p n s �. : v, � ! co cfi % — T r LOT 1 CD 3 r; r= NEW GARAGE to €2 CE '� ' cJ v N/F , N LIAR � �IQ: i a ate' •. , ; , , ' f FOUNDATION `.. / c�.4!.. _ z , c�rn DAVID J. DER HA OPIAN. 2: CEDAR m. _. _ � f c> 53.1 c.; TRUST ( '' CEOjj in > ASSESSORS MAP 33 z LOT 2 Q�a z c PARCEL 2 4 o� DAVID J. >DER o DER HAGOPIAN a 1. 73,130tS.F. UP'AND n LEA -39.55"W N73'37'00 HAGOPIAN CRUST: 2,230fS.F. WETLAND , Q 73, / s j 3' 1 ` . ASSESSORS MAP 33 . D 7 75,360±S.F. TCITAL s �- J ; 3.50 3 50 r X 34.6 1 N N PARCEL 20 Z f, - gQ=4j RESIDENCE i a my'+ LAMP b :Y o 3" CEU 19,982fS.F. UPLAND -• w i z 3.500tS.F. WETLAND m104.9 a U - 2 2fS' cn x r3 CEDAR X 35.9 f _ 262 / 265 OCEAN VIEW AVE. Tt IN PORCH NEW DWELLING a FOUNDATION ,� I `# l m 18 PINE ^.� _ 1 TOF-36.6 f` ,' 5 C i ; 9 , r = �.... w COTUIT Nt w /F I: > � SSACHt� ETTS 34.5 ELIZABETH AUSTIN TR. �' r i � � W� " j � �',. ASSESSORS MAP 33 =-- RESTRICTED AREA ` � ON LC. 671 t®WG / 0 x �AS°-'SW`OWN �B PARCEL 1 � : BARNSTABLE COUNTY) S PA110 � 3��'' I N s — i •'• } gg. s M 1 z AREA z q� 5 x , , 0 J ,� 1 t EXISTING CONDITIONS -'f W +Y N � CO AL BV 100 NK 3 a o PATIO . AREA » $,� � r7, , `J �, _,.., AUGUST 1 2011 en ;, G » lkx 12 MAP o :... . > �s �„s "Cif W "' ; r f 7+• AMP / 25 ' # # CD-8 COASTAL DUNE l R r I rt • w,. : c, m.,. n m alip .. 00 100 : N 0 - S -:, _'..n.,.. - - ::..:- •• •, •:' •. • „` , - € STAKE `& NAi 2 w •• ,...::... `\\ ._ , _ • . FFER � $ SET x. V. o j .. : . . .�� .i' •. ��. , ' r` ., ,` ,� "�j3 - >� N0. DATE DESC. n . r.. 9 t AC 0 .•. 2 1. 1 3/12 COASTAL. DUNE & VEGETATION ,. ,.:,» ••. .,.:,: ,, 2. 1/23 13 REVISE CO .».. ASTAL DUNE �. .. . I GUARD 20� � »...,.. SHACK -. s NAIL• A-7 SET CB DH 15 » SO. BATH y� ,, », .., 1 ' . "`'cAll►p;S »,.,,,•,,:.: -••..».. '" ».,._,_.,,, ,�. 'I5 �"„"""_ n.�,.»�, �Nt� , ,,,, f'z .�,:.�Or'-B- :» .»::,:.,,, - ��` TOVVIAI OF BARNSTABLE . U ....� N►ETLAN """„ ASSESSORS MAP 33 LOCUS INFORMATION PARCEL 21 C COASTAL BANK OQD 1 ry Ott ,,, S 1 _» ». E ,.� »» ,. ,.».,.,. FLOOD , � '� » • , TC 1�. 11 s :3 ( 1 �'� CURRENT OWNER DAVID J. DER HAGOPIAN, TRUSTEE .': � �. :. �� �--.�.�, �`..� »�•.ter» ,� AG N, CB IDH \ �, » D D R HAGOPIAN TRUST N ...\r , r pD X 9, :; ». ra `� v TITLE REFERENCE: CERT. 187881 LAMP PREP ." ". :.: ' .> PREPARED FOR: LA 13 r. BOOK 37 PAGE 65 DAVD DER HAGOPIAN �.. p 13 (ELEii•-� . V= 17 1900 SUMMIT TOWER DLVD. B I5C 5 ASSESS , 33 PARCEL. 2 & 20 { . SUITE 900 ZONING ORL.ANDO, FL , #3 DISTRICT: RF 32810 a ift .tla CBN/L1DH " -� SETBACKS: FRONT 30' (DOC. #3056) - :. " ,. .. .'' SIDE 15 `ice ' 15' � - n� � �� 0 � r REAR <::::�=�>:�>>�x RESTRICTION: FRONT 100 {SEE DOC. #3056} WF#12 wF I1 OVERLAY DISTRICT: RESOURCE PROTECTION B" GROU 349 Route 28, Unit D . (NOT IN A ZONE 11) Yarmouth, Massachusetts � � .•� f�„ W. .Iir, ! FEMA FLOG® 0267 R "x ZONE DISTRICT: ZONE C, A13, A11, V17 & V11 PANEL #250001 0018 D �, AY 5087788919 : .�, �• � 1=3,67 20' .1 per' / MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 87,120 S.F. C 2013 BSC Group, Inc. 12" CMP 4 C! � DRAIN PIPE f / 1.yyo EXISTING L 1 AREA. 5,3S.F. SCALE: 1� = 20' • STING LOT 7 60f S TOTAL ^� � _ .�.--• 5 3: 73,130f S.F. UPLAND ;tRwIES MORSE EXISTING LOT 2 AREA- 23,482t S.F. TOTAL 0 10 20 40 Fw 19,982f S.F. UPLAND FILE:RApr!'\49385fI0\SurveY\BASE\493=—ExfC-2.dwg L=57.90' . �.;-�, •. .�." - DWG. N0: 5928-06 i ., r:. JOB. N0: 49385.00 SHEET 1 OF 1