The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0333 EEL RIVER ROAD - Health 333 EEL RIVER ROSTERVILLE A= ` Mwy 0 1 1� ! U t t } UPC 13134 .2• 3L,� �� u n j c,61 J � J 0 e Sullivan Engineering Inc. 7 Parker Road,P.O.Box 659 Osterville,MA 02655 Peter Sullivan P.E.Mass Registration No.29733 phone 508-428-3344 fax 508428-3115 .peter@sullivanen m�com Health Division January,6, 2010 Town of Barnstable x 200 Main Street Hyannis MA 02601 Re: Birmingham Residence CO 333 Eel River Road, Osterville m Map 115, Parcel 002 coo Dear Health Division Vjrn . This letter is to document the design flow rational that Fused back in 1999 to upgrade the on site septic system for the Birmingham's main house at 333 Eel River Road. On October 26, 19981 did a"walk thru"of the main house and arrived at a total room count of 15 rooms all which met the requirements of"room"-as detailed in-3 10 CMR 15.002, Definitions, Bedroom. At that time for dwellings with more than 8 rooms there were two accepted ways for determining the number of bedrooms for septic design flow. One way was to count actual bedrooms in the dwelling,the other was to take the total room count not including bathrooms,hallways,unfinished cellars and unheated storage areas,divide that number by two and round down to the lowest whole number and that is the presumed bedroom count. In this case the total 15 room count reduces to 7 bedrooms presumed. Although there were and presently are 11 actual bedrooms in the main house it seemed reasonable and practicable to design for 7 bedrooms. Sewage Permit 99-53 was issued for a 7 bedroom design. In 2001 the Hobby House was built as a detached structure and it was considered to be an additional bedroom.As a result the septic system for the Main House was expanded to accept the additional.Hobby House flow under Sewage Permit 2001-568. Lastly in 2005 a detached garage structure was built with 2 additional bedrooms. This structure has a separate septic system to handle its flow and was installed under Sewage Permit 2005-567. If you have any questions please feel free to call this office. �Y Yo � �►$1 PM Peter Sullivan PE SULLIVAN Sullivan Engineering,Inc. o. 2973 3 I Ply , cc: Mrs. Birmingham AL£ � Members of American Society of Civil Engineefs and Boston Society of Civil Engineers Section F TOWN OF BARNSTABLE_BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. Map 1160, Parcel 00q/ Application # 00q Health Division °l -S3 2 0 0( -S S Date Issued ► Conservation Division Application FeeJ�� Planning Dept. Permit Fee �22 Date Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board �ly�l o Historic - OKH Preservation/Hyannis p Project Street Address '5 5 EEL R 1 VEP, RD, Village OSTr,-R u i,LLE , H FT E STRTE OF fan OwnertSWTL Address cfo pit TER-So13 i M.,IC 2.ohaAOD 5r,Ed,•NA-Tie Telephone q 0: F,•g.'►NoWR & 50M i Irk "g tw-- 0176o ' Permit Request RrNOUf TE/AL EEPW472' CY61' 1AIG 91TTIIVC P-H., KirmigN.4 1/1 VA)OR pM nJ17 YOVV cEr--XH , 10-1-Ai , (r 0116 & O IV11116 SEEL 136-MS IN /-/Vr KITCH61j AS VM ATrf-CND DVA-V 1N6S W69t& Square feet: 1 st floor: existin proposed �2nd floor: existing (, proposed _Total new Zoning District VA Flood Plain At Groundwater Overlay 0M Project Valuation 16 100 Construction Type_VP00 FPATTC, . Lot Size 2•01 hCG41_Gz Grandfathered: ❑Yes O No If yes, attach supporting documentation. Y Dwelling Type: Single Family )Q Two Family ❑ Multi-Family(# units) Age of Existing Structure Historic House: ❑Yes ❑ No On Old King's Highway: ❑Yes No Basement Type: Full ❑ Crawl ❑Walkout ❑Other Basement Finished Area(sq.ft.) /J/f Basement Unfinished Area(sq.ft) Number of Baths: Full: existing 4 new 0 Half: existing i new 0 Number of Bedrooms: 10 existing b new Total Room Count (not including baths): existing mr new 0 First Floor Room Count Heat Type and Fuel: 0 Gas ❑Oil ❑ Electric ❑ Other NOT el k. Central Air: X Yes ❑ No Fireplaces: Existing New D Existing wood/coal stove: ❑Yes A No Detached garage:'W existing ❑ new sizekqLp &Pool: ❑ existing ❑ new size 4& Barn: ❑ existing ❑ new sizeAa' Attached garage:.] existing ❑ new size Ik Shed: ❑ existing ❑ new size Other: j5o#r ItovSc-Ce1S%//✓6.. Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization ❑ Appeal # Recorded ❑ Commercial ❑Yes A No If yes, site plan review# Current Use RF 51 DW- i 141, Proposed Use l S D Pl3"/r nl �. .IL -min i" rl R a-/- !. V b V •. ,a/ ✓! i"l i�`/1 ...•r.w�`y.Tom. APPLICANT INFORMATION _ (BUILDER OR HOMEOWNER) Name O ZILP �: � -l� ' SO?J`� (PJC9 Telepho _e'Number - Address I�J� QSTM (� �APLNS,4- ItLkU 120 • License#_ CS C5BS1 IXTMV l V � �� Home Improvement Contractor#i M A- Z Worker's Compensation # WC R D or b kl ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BETAKEN TO b 1=1 02 SIGNATURE DATE -iX�- � ----- _---- No. Fee -f- OARD OF HEALTH 00 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE J� AppticationArVerr Co0tructionVertnit Application is hereby made�for /a permit to Construct ( ), Alter ( ), or Repair ( )an individual Well at: Location — Address Assessors Map and Parcel -- -- ----------------------- --- Owner Address Installer — Driller — Address Type of Building Dwelling —�s i %�Othe ---- — _ of Building------_—___________ No. of Persons—____ Type f Well— --�_l«- --- Purpo of Well----� � Agreement: The undersigned agrees to install the aforedescribed individual well in accordance with the provisions of The Town of Barnstable Board of Health Private Well Protection Regulation — The undersigned further agrees not to place the well in operation until a Certificate .of Compliance has been issued by the Board of Health. Signe —ice ace Application Approved By, _— 0 � " da Application Disapproved for the followin Zris: —------_________—_____ — —�^ ----- —_—.__ -- — — —-- —__ date —. Permit No. Ol//7C//Q/�/ -- Issued--- /o -& --- ---—_____—------ date BOARD OF HEALTH TOWN OF BARNSTABLE (Certificate ®f Compliance THIS IS TO CERTIFY, That the Individual Well Constructed (!/)!Altered ( ), or Repaired ( ) by � Sc� w�l/� �� --------- ------------------- at Installer has been installed in accordance with the provisions of the Town of Barnstable Board of Healtthh vate Well Protection Regulation as described in the application for Well Construction Permit No. ------ ated------------------ THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE THAT THE WELL SYSTEM WILL FUNCTION SATISFACTORY. DATE—____--- — - Inspector---- —-- — f , No. Fee------r------------ BOARD OF HEALTH TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ,,��J �ppivat.ion:,�or�eC[,..�ot�gtrutt[onerrurt Application is hereby made fora permit to Construct ( ), Alter ( ), or Repair ( )an individual Well at: Location — Address Assessors Map and Parcel !Owner --- —-- --- Address -----------------------------------------Address —— —---------------------- Installer — Drillerp Type of Building ; Dwelling -------------- Other=Type of Building--=----_—__--__________ No. of Persons------------------ ----_-_—__ ----- Type - Well — Purpo - of Well---- �'� -sue Agreement: The undersigned agrees to install the aforedescribed individual well in accordance with the provisions of The Town of Barnstable Board of Health Private Well Protection Regulation - The undersigned further agrees not to place the well in operation until a Certificate .of Compliance has been issued by the Board of Health. SignedfA A _------ —A lication A roved Bif%( _��_J???!� a_ �1/te PP PP Y - / f1! __ daty Application Disapproved for the followin asons: -----------------------_ -- -- ---- -- - —=-- - — ----- - t -_- - -- -- — --- Permit No. �J-C � -- — — -- Issued--- �-- date - - -— ate----------- �Jjpl—o date `l _____..________________________________________..__________________ ____.____----______________--- BOARD OF HEALTH TOWN OF tBARNSTABLE Certificate Of Compliance i THIS IS TO CERTIFY, That the Individual Well Constructed (vKAltered ( ), or Repaired ( ) by��r�w�r�/ w� //fir,� �---------------------------- - -- ---—---- -------—-- ------------ ', Installer at— — Z�— �,� d!�___ ��S% r//o —---------------------- ------- — — --- — has been installed in accordance with the provisions of the Town of Barnstable Board of Health P ovate Well Protection Regulation as described in the application for Well Construction Permit No. - ated-------------------- THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE THAT THE WELL SYSTEM WILL FUNCTION SATISFACTORY. 4, �y DATE---- --- -- - ——_ Inspector---------------------------------- _as--_®____e______ m_a__®___e__s_______._ m®__o_a®®mm_------o.m__emm:,_e. ti BOARD OF HEALTH TOWN OF BARNSTABLE h Ivell Con!6truct ion Permit VOL` � 'No. -v.� �� Fee- ------- t Permission is hereby to Construct (!,), Alter ( ), or Repair ( ) an Individual Well at: Street ------------------------------------------------------------ as shown on the a plicatio -fora.Well onstruction Permit 0 No.----- � � _-- ----- Dated - v DATEYK- ard of Health No. �—C/�^5� Fee /J / • THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACgUSETTS Entered in computer. Yes PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION - TOWN OF BARNSTABLE. MASSACHUSETTS 01ppYication for Migpo.5ar *pgtem Congtruction Permit Application for a Permit to Construct(x )Repair( )Upgrade( )Abandon( ) XComplete System O Individual Components Location Address or Lot No. 333 EEL R t V ER 9.0 Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. 0STERv1L.LE, M,9S5. SC.)1,N b,►LAREN (31JZmi VGI.IAM Assessor's Map/Parcel 333 E.EL Rt VE¢ RID M 115 P OO2 ©STC RV1 LLC M,455 Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. A1j4 �O dig Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No.SO Fr-4 2.S—33.4�{ n $4LI.IVAN L=NGINEEQI/V9 INC. VfU z jewao- /A 7 PARICCR RD. G-y ev, 5 Y 0ST62V(LLE 1W.4,55' Type of Building: Dwelling No.of Bedrooms 2 Lot Size 2.O I A! Garbage Grinder(No) Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow z G gallons per day. Calculated daily flow gallons. Plan Date A P R I L 21, 2-o 0.S Number of sheets 1 Revision Date OCT. 3 1. 2 0 o S- Title S I TE PLAIV P(Z0F0SCD G AfZAGC Size of Septic Tank /Sop GALLONS - 0) Type of S.A.S. 1 o`x I q° LL AC.h11vC� CRAMBE L Description of Soil 0-3 ORGAINICS-O- 1 3 - 12' 13RN SA1-+DY LOAM 10 N/R L4/3 -A— I 2'= 3Q" YC0SN QRN LOAMY SAND 101/l2 5-1G-B-; OL1VO Y LLow M ED SAND 2.6 Y G/G- C— Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) Date last inspected: Agreement: The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of T' 45o the Environmental Code and not to place the system in operation until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has been,iss ed iard Si Date Application Approved Date 11 Application Disapproved or t e following reasons Permit No. C 5 5 Date Issued 1 Q -20 No. Fee ,!,,"THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSAC S Entered in computer: ; Yes ' PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION -TOWN OF BARNSTABLES MASSACHUSETTS Zippti ration for Xh5pogal 44p5tem Construction Permit Application.for a Permit to Construct,O )Repair( )Upgrade'( )Abandop ) Complete System ❑Individual Components . Location Address or Lot No.3 3 3 E E L R M V t_R R D Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. / `` r75Tl:RV 1 LLE, M/a55• ,�t>hN dr ICAt�EN l�1 RMI NG-HAM ' Assessor's Map/Parcel 3 3 L L L R I VG Q F,D M 1 15 P 00 Z OST1=RVI t-L& `y`Jl�S 5- Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No.5v - Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No.6o 5--'-I 2-0- S 3 4 4 SUL- LIVAN VNG-INEGQI/Vy ING. I 05T62V1LLE /YJ�SS Type of Building: Dwelling No.of Bedrooms 2 Lot Size Z.of Ac sq-ft~- Garbage Grinder(tjo) '.Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow 2 Z to gallons per day. Calculated daily flow -2-Z O gallons. Plan Date'A P Q t t_ -).t . -.7-n n4 Number of sheets 1 Revision Date o cr. 3 1 o G.6- Title S I TE CLAN f;-'f2o Pr)sr;D CrARA&I= Size of Septic Tank /5 oo GALt-0NS /�4-10 Type of S.A.S.t o'x 1 a Lt.ALhIN6- C RA' MB 'Q Description of Soil;0-3 ORC-ANIcS- O- 3''- IZ2" (3RN SANDYLaAM lo`/R H/3 -A-- I -Z"- 39 " YEL'1541 13RN LOAMY SAN17 10yR S .-B-1 39 - 1'12" GLMVC- YELLOW � MGD SANi) Z. S Y !// - C — v Nature of Repairs-or Alterations(Answer when applicable) Date last inspected: Agreement: "V The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of ptle 5 off+the Environmental Code and not to place the system in operation until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has been is tied ibJy hhiAoard of Health: - - g t,� Shined V� - Date Application Approved y7 Date �i f Application,Disapprove of he following reasons f g , Permit No. c"��D 6 7 Date Issued 1 S— -------.------------------------ '--. THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS f�V BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS Certificate of Compliance THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the On-site Sewage Disposal System Constructed(x)Repaired ( )Upgraded( ) Abandoned( )by at.3 3-3 F-C L 2 1 y E fZ R c�A D f U S f E 2l/►LLE r M/ ST, _has been constructed in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 and the for Disposal System Construction Permit No. S "s dated 1 1 tf1 5 Installer _ �, i�-a�-- Designer S u 1 VA rA 1= C . The issuance f thisJr ermit shall not be construed as a guarantee that the sy tem 11 fu ction%s designed. Date 1� )I t)(o Inspector r�< LL ti No.�!�'��, j V Fee THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION - BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS Oioogar *raem ttCon!5truction Permit Permission is hereby granted to Construct(x)Repair( )Upgrade( )Abandon( ) System located at 333 LE L 21 VC D- 2GAD r S� .�T4 21 It l_L& rYl/-15-5. and as described in the above Application for Disposal System Construction Permit. The applicant recognizes his/her duty to comply with Title 5 and the following local provisions or special conditions. Provided: Constructi.or-rVust b completed within three years of the date f this pe. Date:_, wApproved b, Jan, 11, 2010 12: 11PM -�= _,...�.. ��: No, 3142 P. , 2/2 Town of Barnstable tab Regulatory Services ` ze Thomas F.Geaer,Director Public Health Division. Thomas Mclean,Director < Z00 Maim Street,Hyannis,MA OW1 Office:508-862-4644 Fax:500 790-6304 Tastaller,&Desiper Certification Form Date: ! (Z 0-4—Sewage Permit# s�� Assessor's MapWareel-1/5' Z004 Designer: Sullivan Eng�nee '' g, Installer yMd�, C''�'c-" /✓d%4n-,c�� Address: P_0. Box 659 0900e,,M& Addreas:'�- P 9J On _ was issued g permit to install a (date) (ia"er) septic system at 333 R e L- IZI ve 2 RQ, os-p-gavl Rii based on a design drawn by (address) SulliW E&du2mk&inc. dated I ,t DATE 12 31/oS (designer) --- I certify that the scoc system referenced above was installed substantially according to the design,which many include minor approved changes such as. lateral relocation of the distnUtion box andlar septic tank I certify that the septic system referenced above was installed with major Oangee (i,e.greater than 10' lateral relocation of the SAS or any vertical relocation of any component of the septic system)but in accordance with-State&Local Regulations. Plan revision br certified as-bush designer to follow. l OF (Installer's Signattue) as (Designer's Sipature) (Affix Designer'S.Stamp Hems) PLEASE RETURN TO BARNSTAXE PUBLIC HEALTH D1vWON.CERTMCATt O . COMP'WNCE W)LL NOT BE ISSUED UNTM BOTH THIS FORM AND AS-Bt1bT CARD ARE RECEIVED BY TOE BARNSTABLE rUMLXC HEALTH DX IOX.MANK You. Q:IWdv epdc/Deaigner C ST=sdim Form 3.26.04.dm ;1Y--.Ik TOWN OF BARNSTABLE LOCATION 9 G` et✓6 12--.) SEWAGE #Z06 VILLAGE V,�� ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT ��J GIuZ INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO._ � l,�'1�ti li•-o//I/o/t r/l 3 5�° -�1t7�- SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY 0 LEACHING FACILITY: (type) (Z) SW 6,0, '->.,Lywsc,.d (size) NO. OF BEDROOMS EBUELD )QR OWNER PERMITDATE: t o C� COMPLIANCE DATE: Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table to the Bottom of Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of leachin facility) : Feet Furnished by �r4%zr•� ' /VC 0i r i . -�333 iJ A',�� pQ�� TOWN OF BARNSTABLE 1 LO(�?ATION �3 '�' ��✓S 12�2 SEWAGE #1Z00``- 56,7 VILLAGE V ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT e3 �4- - INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. R�� C��fiA� o ZMI-4r.,j 5�g — 2 f SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY LEACHING FACILITY: (type) �Z� 6''.,->JLywJt-, (size) /b �C NO. OF BEDROOMS Z =BUILD OR OWNER PERMITDATE: t 4' O COMPLIANCE DATE: Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table to the Bottom of Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of leachin facility) Feet Furnished by ��y �AZt^"`'v /Vew v 333 EMI �1r Town of Barnstable 1111E �/ Department of]iegi latory Services a►a►iar�acc 3 Public Health Division Date - ts79, `b$ 200 Main Strcct,Ilyannis MA 02601 Date Scheduled / Tinte / t. ;Fee I'd. Soil Suitability Assessrne.nt for Sewage A osal Performed By: hi b=r 1�-A Witnessed By: _ AD LOCATION& GENERAL INFORMATION Location Address 3 3 3 Eel /tJi d c-r' pu��-� Owner's Namcl'v f�� P. 6)'CM'nj h'ZM 0sk v l 11'e Address trdt Qct K14h� SF.Exf IYGcl7Z MA (s/7!e(1 Assessor's Map/Parcel: /na.r //5 Pa-re O�O� r .Enginccr'sNantcSV/h'V&)7 L»9j'n�er�'be LG"•, ' NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIR Telephone rl 3 y y r - Land Use Ly�Dcnl.,'�� Slopes'(%) b ®% Surface Stones A)hVA-P, . Distances from: Open Water Body QQ Q Possible Wet Area J It Drinking Water Well 50 + 11 Drainage Way45�bO R Properly Line to_n Other SKETCII:(Street name,dimensions of lot,exact locations of test holes&perc tests,locate wetlands in proximity to hulcs) G VC to Or / _ ael p �Z Up a � �D a, tl E 11 i tos - v y �w i Parent material(geologic) Dcplh to Bedrock it Depdi to Groundwater: Standing Water in ITole: i(i Weeping from Pit face Estimated Seasonal Iligh Groundwater EL, Z-O DETERMINATION VOR SEASONAL HIGII•WATER TABLE Method Used: AlenV 0ITt-H\N ''500 OF bC6t31�v �,(Atom 3�1 T.0�. •tQ.W Dcplh Observed standing in obs.hole: in. Depth to soil mottles: Dcptll to weeping ffom side ofobs-huic: -- in. GroondwatcrAdjustment n. 6y Index Well a Reading Date: Index Well level Adj.factur Adj.Groundwater Lcvcl_ PERCOLATION TEST Dale 1qz,(1 Time W. Observation Ilole r! _�_ �- Tinnc at 9" • � r 4 Depth of Perc Time at 6" Start Pre-soak Tlme© ZS (05%0"z;,— Timc(9"-6") ' End Pre-soak _ Rate MinAnch Site Suitability Assessment: Site Passed Site failed: Add itional'1'csting Needed(Y/N) , Original: Public Health Division Observation Hole Data,Ib Be Completed on Back----------- ***If percolation test is to be conducted within 100' of wetland,you must first 110tify the Barnstable Conservation Division at least one(1)weel(prior to beginning. - p:llrAl Tll/WP/MERCfORM ' VEEP OBSERVATION MOLL LOG Hole It Dcplhliunn Soilllurizon SURTcxhnc Soil color Soil Vthcr 5urlkl a(In.) (USDA) (Muisoll) Mottling (ShncWra,Stones,llt,uldels. A, SlUl7 i[�flhe►-. 1 q�hR y�2 r�, 12- " IS C tm �� 16Yl2�c _ DEEP OBSERVATION MOLL LOG II01c# ` , Depth from Soil Horizon -Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Mursell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Douldcrs. Cunsistcncy,%Grovel) _ ��-38 ' � lr�►`� l0`I�� !a C7 DEL,P OBSERVATION HOLE LOG IIole ll Depth from Soil 1Torizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil . Other Surrace(in.) (USDA) (Munscll) Mottling (Struchrre,Stones,Moulders. Consistclic ,Jy_Q a_yci)__ DEEP OBSERVATION MOLE LOG Role It Depth from Soil horizon Suil Tcxlure Soil Color Soil Other Surrace(in.) (USDA) (Munscll) Mottling (Structure,Slomes,Moulders. Consistency,%Grave Tlood insurance Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary No.✓ Yes Within 500 year boundary No Yes i/ Within 100 year flood buundary No L--" Yes Depth of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet or-naturally occurring pervious material exist in all areas observed througllout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? yE5 If not,what is Vie depth of naturally occurring pervious nlatcrial? Ccrt ficafi n I certify that on OL (date)I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required training,expertise and experience described in 310 CMR 1.5.017. Signature Date 10 K - Q HEALTH WP/P11ItCFORM TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Map Parcel Permit# Health Division • ��- f L� o` - �- �y-53 Date Issued I C3 (.-- L C Conservation Division y. rho 0)0A 5_0,43Q (� yI LL�u � Application Fee Tax Collector Permit Fee Treasurer Planning Dept. EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM Date Definitive Plan Approved b PlanningBoard LIMITED TO tv �' #OF BEDROOM P� Historic-OK Preaervafion nnip` 16 Project Street Address .3,3.E VE,42 A b Village IC ie' Owner \111-64 ;9(Rtn1NIo 1111A _Address Telephone e/d ��p � 7 A� VO Permit Request /� C-44 9Ad /` � �J VL/ Square feet: 1st floor: existing proposed 2nd floor:existing proposed 6 Total new Zoning District Flood Plain _ Groundwater Overlay P Project Valuation Construction Type W&I i fA Lot Size d' 0/ •i cm, S Grandfathered: ❑Yes ❑No If yes, attach supporting documentation. Dwelling Type: Single Family ❑ Two Family ❑ Multi-Family j#units) Age of Existing Structure IWO Historic House: ❑Yes Wo On Old King's Highway: ❑Yes 4 No Basement Type: ❑Full ❑Crawl ❑Walkout ❑Other SL 43 — rah 4r- Basement Finished Area(sq.ft.) Basement Unfinished Area(sq.ft) Number of Baths: Full: existing new Half: existing new—a Number of Bedrooms: existing new Total Room Count(not including baths): existing new First Floor Room Count Heat Type and Fuel: ❑Gas Cl Oil ❑Electric ❑Other /4/6 Central Air: ❑Yes No Fireplaces: Existing New Existing wood/coal stove: ❑Yes No Detached garage:❑existing &new size ( Pool:❑existing ❑new size Barn:Cl existing ❑new size Attached garage:❑existing ❑new size Shed:❑existing ❑new size Other: Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization ❑ Appeal# Recorded❑ -- Commercial ❑Yes &No -If-yes,-site plan review# -- - - Current Use l � ,fir�fp Proposed Use BUILDER INFORMATION Name A#y5 /hF, 6 6"11t)(0 Telephone Number Address j0k q< License# �U 5 qS CE/cf/ IFS- V I LL"r- Home Improvement Contractor# Worker's Compensation# ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO `iU1� SIGNATUREe� _ DATE L� I ` Y Q LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 100100292 Bureau of Waste Prevention—Air Quality Decal Number Project Revision Notification For Asbestos Notification ANF-001 and AQ 06 '"'pwu"" When filling out A. Facility Location corms on -KAREN BIRINGHAM computer,,use only the tab key 1.(Name of Facility to move your 333 EEL RIVER RD cursor-do not use the return 2,Street Address key. BARNSTABLE MA r 3.City 4.State 5.Zip Code zi 5064282685 6.Telephone Nmber INSTRUCTIONS B. Project Cancelled 1. This form is only available for Check here if this project is/was cancelled. onllne filing of project date revisions. 2. Enter project -- decal number. C. Project Dates 3. Validate that the project 01127/2010 01/28/2010 the location i8 cor►ett 1.Original Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) 2.Original End Data(mm/ddtvml for the entered 01/27/2010 01/27/2010 t decal. 3,Latest Revised Stan Date(mm/dd/yyyy) 4.Lamest Revised End Date(mm/ddyyyy) 4. Enter your new project dates. 5. Certify your notification. D. Revised Project Dates Submit date changes. 1.Revised Start Date(mm/dd/yyyy) 2.Revised End Date Date(mw/ddyyyy) E. Other Project Revisions F. Revision History EDEP:01/20/201012:21:23 PM r� EDEP:01/2512010 04:30:22 PM v1 1.`. anf06pdm.doc•rev.2/5/04 f � Commonwealth of Massachusetts ■ 100100292. Ll Asbestos Notification Form ANF-001 Decal Number Important: A. Asbestos Abatement Description When filling out forms on the computer.use 1, a.is this facility fee exempt-city,town.district municipal housing authority,owner-occupied only the tab key residence of four units or less? ✓ Yes No to move your cursor-do not b.Provide blanket decal number if applicable: Blanket Decal Number use the return key" 2. Facility Location: KAREN BIRINOHAM 333 EEL RIVER RD a.Name of Facility �• b.street Address BARfrSTftt� V 64eo-/r 1(f- MA 02655 (600)428-2685 c.City/Town d.Slatla e,Zip Code f.Telephone Number INSTRUCTIONS 3. Worksite Location: 1.All sections of cols SAME form must be a.Building Name/Building Location b.Building! c.Wing. d.Floor a.Room completed in order to comply with 4. Is the facility occupied? Yes No DEP notification requirements of 310 CMR 1.1$ 5. Asbestos Contractor: and the Diviaion of Occupational AIR SAFE INC 61 ENDICOTT STREET safety(DOS) a.Name b.Address notification naquiremants Of ass q NORWOOD 02062 7817623320 ulre CMR 8,12 c.City/Town d,Zip Code e.Telephone Number AC000L64 g.Contract Type. WN1ten verbal f.DOS license Number h.Facility Contact Person i.Contact PersoWs Title 8. JAIME E AMAYA AS060847 a.Name of On-Site SupeMsor/Forernan b.Supervisor/Foreman DOS Certilcagon Number 7. NA a.Name of Project Monitor b.Project Monitor DOS CeAMeadon Number e. a.NA Name of Asbestos Analytical Lab b,Asbestos Analytical Lob DOS Certification Number 01/27/2010 01/28/2010 0 9' a.Project Start Deb(m Wddymr) b.&W Dab pnnNddlytryy) o a c.Work houre Mon-Fd. d.Work hours Sat-Sun. o 10. a. What type of project Is this? c Demolition..'-- t Renovation Repair Other,please specify: b_Describe 11. a. Check abatement procedures: ✓ Glove bag Encapsulation o Enclosure Disposal only Cleanup Other, specify: Full containment b•Describe z Q 12. Is the job being conducted: ✓ Indoors? Outdoors? an1001 ap.doc-10102 Asbestos Notification Form•Page 1 of 3 I Commonwealth of Massachusetts ■ 11001100012 Ll Asbestos Notification Form ANF-001 Decal Number A. Asbestos Abatement Description (cont.) 13. Total amount of each type of Asbestos Containing Materials(ACM)to be removed,enclosed, or encapsulated: 20 3 a.Total pipes or duets(linear ft) b.Total other surfaces(square 11) o.Boiler,breaching,dud,tank 20 3 d.Insulating cement surface coatings Lin.ft. Sq.ft. Lin.R. Sq.(L 9.Com4af ed or layered paper f.Trowenprayer coatings pipe insulation Un.ft Sq.IL Lin,ft, Sq.fL 9.Spray-on fireproofing Lin.ft. Sq.IL h.Transits board.wall board Lin.R Sq.R 1.Goths.woven fabrics Lin.R. Sq.ft. j.Other,please specify: Lin.ft. so.R. It.Thermal,solid core pipe insulation Lin.ft. Sa,It, I.Specify 14. Describe the decontamination system(s)to be used: 3 CHAMBER DECON 15. Describe the containerization/disposal methods to comply with 310 CMR 7.15 and 453 CMR 6.14(2)(g): 6 MIL POLY BAGS 18. For Emergency Asbestos Operations, the DEP and DOS officials who evaluated the emergency: a.Name of DEP Official b.Title e.Date(mm/dd/yyyy)of AuthoA2adon d.DEP Waiver# e,Name of DOS Official f.DOS O!tidal'nft cV g,Date(mm/dd/yyyy)of Authorization h.DOS Waiver s c 17. Do prevailing wage rates as per M.G.L.c.149, §28,27 or 27A—F apply to this project? Yes f No B. Facility Description N RESIDENTIAL 0 1. Current or prior use of facility: 2. Is the facility owner-occupied residential with 4 units or less? V Yes No SAME 3' a,Facility Owner Name b.Address o o C.City/Town d.21p Code e.Telephone Number(area code and eXtenslon) ' 4' a.Name of Facility Owners On•Site Manager b,OnSipe Manager Address Z Q a City/Town d.Zip Code e.Telephone Number(area code and extension) onf001ap.doc-10102 Asbestos Notification Forth•P e 2 of 31 commommalth of Massachusetts ■ 100100282 Ll Asbestos Notification Form ANF-001 Decal Number B. Facility Description (cont.) 5' a.Name of General Contn nor b.Address C.Clty/rown d.Zip Code a.Telephone Number(area code and extension) f.Contractor's Worltera Comp,Insurer g.Polity Number h.Exp.Date(mnVdd/yyyy) 6. What is the size of this facility? a.square Feat b.Number of floors C. Asbestos Transportation and Disposal . 1. Transporter of asbestos-containing material from site to temporary storage site(if necessary): AIRSAFE Notes Transfer a.Name of Transporter b.Address Stations must comply with the c Cityf town 0.ZIP Code e.Telephone Number Solid Weate Divislon 2. Transporter of asbestos-containing waste material from removal/temporary site to final disposal site: Regulations 310 CMR 19,000 a.Name of Transporter b.Address c.Clty/rown d.Zlp Code e.Telephone Number 3. a.Refuse Transfer Station and Owner b.Address C.Clry/rown d.tip Code e,Telephone Number 4. 1 NO REMOVAL..DISTURBING ONLY OHCDd a.Final Disposal Site Location Name b.Final Disposal Site Location Owner's Name NO REMOVAL.DISTURBING BOSTON c.Final Disposal Sete Address d.Clprfrown MA 02108 0.Stale f.Zip Code g.Telephone Number 0 D. Certification N The undersigned hereby states,under the OF WALSH penalties of perjury,that he/she has read the a.Name b,Authorized Signature c Commonwealth of Massachusetts regulations VP for the Removal,Containment or Encapsulation of Asbestos,453 CMR 6.00 and c PosltloMltle d,Date(mmlddhlyW) 310 CMR 7.15,and that the information (781)762-3380 AS contained In this notification is true and corred e.Telephone Number f.Representing to the best of his/her knowledge and belief. 61 ENDICOTT o q.Address u. NORWOOD 02002 h.Clty/Town i.Zip Code • Z . Q an10o1ap.doc•10/02 Asbestos Notification Form•Page 3 of 3■ 46 DOppO •O._R",7�w EJJAXTIMER BUILDER, INC. January 15, 2001 Board of Health Town of Barnstable South Street Hyannis, MA 02601 RE: 333 Eel River Road, Osterville In regards to the above address, the new septic system that was installed is designed to handle (7) bedrooms. In 1999, E. J. Jaxtimer, Builder, Inc. eliminated the Master Bedroom area and created a Family Room reducing the number of bedrooms to six. Now we would like to construct a new Master Bedroom Suite which will bring the number of bedrooms back to seven which is what the system is designed for. Any questions, please do not hesitate to call. SkaxEr 48 Rosary Lane, Hyannis, Mass. 02601 508-771-4498 e 508-778-4911 FAX 508-775-4909 ti w ` No. �1� YJ "dam Fee T COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Entered in computer: PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION -TOWN OF BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS Ve 0.pprication for Miopoml 6potem Conotructton Permit Application for a Permit to Construct( )Repair( )Upgrade( )Abandon( ) ❑Complete System O Individual Components Location Address or Lot No. k Q_> Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. Assessor's Map/Parcel J Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No. ly Type of Building: Dwelling No.of Bedrooms Lot Size sq.ft. Garbage Grinder( ) Other TI pe of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow gallons per day. Calculated daily flow gallons. Plan Date Number of sheets Revision Date Title Size of Septic Tank Type of S.A.S. Description of Soil Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) Date last inspected: Agreement: The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the Environmental Code and not to place the system in operation until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has been issuetby this Bo d oWealt . Signed cy Date Vic' 1 0, Application Approved by 0 Date Application Disapproved for the following reaso Permit No. Date Issued �s SDI r6G A Fee '®O THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Entered in computer: Y PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION - TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS V f y` 01policatiou for Migozar *pztem Cougtrurtiorl 'Permit r Application for a Permit to Construct( )Repair( A )Upgrade( )Abandon( ) ❑Complete System ❑Individual Components Location Address or Lot No.3 3 60 +Rina. Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. Assessor's Map/Parcel M Q-S t~v'\!� Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. �••• Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No. t Type of Building: Dwelling No.of Bedrooms 1 Lot Size sq.ft. Garbage Grinder( ) Other Type of Building ,No. of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow T gallons per day. Calculated daily flow gallons. Plan Date Number of sheets Revision Date _ Title i Size of Septic Tank Type of S.A.S. Description of Soil Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) Date last inspected: Agreement: j The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the Environmental Code and not to place the system in operation until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has been issus3 by this Bo d o ealt . Signed Date T Z- 0) Application Approved by O u Date Application Disapproved for the following reaso Permit No. ' Date Issued 4. THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS Certif irate of Compliance 0- -THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the On-site Sewage Disposal System Constructed( )Repaired( )Upgraded( ) Abandoned( )by 4 e" 6.a'r at S33 F-gt �Z 0,vc- has been constructed in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 and the for Disposal System Construction Permit No.��\- E)(o% dated 3 V U l Installerr� `zSZ�IIVS Designer �1�t�G.nt1C+� S?S•�'nC� The issuance of this permit shall not be construed as a guarantee that the s ill functio as d sig�ned. Date .ec�'' •°"" C7� Inspecto r _. . o. �J�-� p -----—------------------------ d.. N Fee i THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS , PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION - BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS Xi5po5ar & otem Construction Permit Permission is hereby granted to Construct Repair( Upgrade( )Abandon( ) System located at 3}3 ! t and as described in the above Application for Disposal System Construction Permit.The applicant recognizes his/her duty to comply with Title 5 and the following local provisions or special conditions. Provided: Construction m t be omplxe�r three years of the date of thi e t. Date: Approved byies Design Flow Single Family: Existing Bedrooms 7 Proposed 1 ` Total Bedrooms 8 Total Flow (no grinder) 880 gpd Septic Tank 7 @ 200% daily flow= 1540 gpd a t Existing 2000 Gallon Tank Complies �� .• �;n Play house to be piped separately to new septic tank Septic Tank for 1 bedroom @ 200% daily flow= 220 gpd Use 1500 gallon tank ` jG !•/ L�` `fir'<T'1j C7 .Leaching Area: 880 GPD/0.74= 1189 sf Required '? Existing: 12'x62' -nn ur n. field w/7- 500 Gal chambers `' ` `°A F1�Wi Area Provided = 1056 sf �,,< �?, Y� )�� ,�i, (; ,l2—/STONE Proposed: 8'x16.5'field w/ 1 - 500 Gal chamber c " ` Area Provided = 197 sf Total Area Provided = 1253 sf r 'j�� SE:tV1\C_ PLAN VIEW OF PROPOSED SEPTIC UPGRADE NOT TO SCALE HOBBY f..t: HOUSE PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM 1500 b�L. MNK UPGRADE FOR PLAYHOUSE AT �� 333 ITL RIVER ROAD 1-7 ,pyq @'- OST'ERVMLE, MASS rylfl"Y k�n� <<ro FOR 'Ell C IJ L JOHN & KAREN BIRIVIINGHAM SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE: AUGUST 20,2001 `%' SULLIVAN ENGINEERING INC. OSTERMLE,MASS # SHEET 2 OF 2 xEt -3: yf ."••'i .�, k'",^ t `,,' . 3"C a" ydf 3f'_j,cr t 1 i't• l �: pm. Mtn V ystiJ'.�; tT i r"✓ '`3. �r�' . P r T [e k TOWN OF BARNSTABLE LOCATION 3 3 t� SEWAGE # �� VILLAGE-- ',,tc�i�, ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. . ,'SEPTIC--TANK:CAPACITY: - LEACHING FACILITY: (type) (size) J�X_ Zf NO.OF BEDROOMS . F BUILDER OR OWNER PERMIT DATE:* 1 I:/01. COMPL CE DATE: 11 1 Separation Distance Between the: ll Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Tableland Bottom of Leaching Facility - Pnvate Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells east on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) { Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility (If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of leaching facility.) Feet Furnished by � �fL�C i►.\S u a� - + . /,fi _ +. TOWN OF BARNSTABLE " LOCATION . SEWAGE VILLAGE- .L GE ASSE• OR S MAP & LOT INSTALLER'S NE N SEPTIC TANK C CITY �✓ '' LEACHING FAC Pe) ( 'ze) Ll®xAr _ NO. OF BEDROO BUILDER OR 0 R � 1 Ia )� I PERMITDATE: '. � O CO L .�DATE: i' Separation Distance Between the Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table and Bottom of Leachin Facili Feet J .f_ Private.Water Supply Well and �a/n Facility \ �e g ty (If any wells exis on-site or within 200 fe ` of leaching facility) \.. Feet Edge of Wetland and . aching;Facility (If any wetlands exist viithin'3C0 f of leaching facility) Feet Furnishe �e 6. t, f TOWN_ OF BARNSTABLE 33 € P S�O LOCATION � SEWAGE # I�•-�� VU-LAGE �0 �� ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. c. SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY LEACHING FACILITY: (type) (size) A®x NO. OF BEDROOMS a BUILDER OR OWNER ) PERMIT DATE: �I I /O I COMPL CE DATE: 5�V.0— Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table and Bottom of Leaching.Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of leaching facility) Feet Furnished by -� �-��►`1S r 4V.41 '4 AsBuilt Page 1 of 2 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE LOCWAT10N 3!`p►' l SEWAGE N,DMI SW VILLAGE ASSESSOR'S MAP&LOT—&5-.L . INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. La 7 SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY SOU i LEACHING FACILITY:(type) (size)- .I,0X NO.OF BEDROOMS BUILDER OR OWNER PERmrrDATE: �1 I �O I COMPL CE DATE: a 1 IO I Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table and Bottom of Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of leaching facility) Feet Fumished by M Z'E eX_kQ S a • �i4 lie U.S�' gib i http://issgl2/intranet/propdata/prebuilt.aspx?mappar=i 15002&seq=1 1/10/2017 NO. �NWEALTH '1 V Fee Entered in computer: THE C OF MASSACHUSETTS p Yes PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION -TOWN OF BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS ZIpprication for Migozal *pgtem Construction Vermit Application for a Permit to Construct( )Repair(K Upgrade( )Abandon( ) ❑Complete System ❑Individual Components Location Address or Lot No. 3�j3 ` �� Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. J�Kcv�� 'o�L1J. ep1�1�'dw��GF�w\, Assessor's Map/Parcel Installer's Name,Address,and Tel`.No. - Des' er's Name,Address and Tel.No. Type of Building: /kc- Dwelling No.of Bedrooms Lot Size 2 sqr-4r Garbage Grinder AO Other Type of Building No. of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow 770 gallons per day. Calculated daily flow `770 gallons. Plan Date T's 21 1 q��)q Numb e of sheets t Revision Date U0 u 1; Title S Wit? R 6— Size of Septic Tank 6%'7AL_L-0 ru Type of S.A.S. Description of Soil C t-EA.,-.l M E:D Sy,, -t r_> Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) STA-4-LQ �S Date last inspected: Agreement: The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the Environmental Code and not to place the system in operation until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has been issued by this Boazd Heal Signed Date P00 Application Approved by m Date Application Disapproved f e following reasons Permit No. Date Issued ..�.». No .� L/� (� Fee Entered in computer: THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS t .� Yes PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION - TOWN OF BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS ZippYication for Migpogal 6pelem Construction Permit Application for a Permit to Construct( )Repair(X)Upgrade( )Abandon( ) ❑Complete System ❑Individual Components Location Address or Lot No. �j�j3 `�'�`v -C—fl Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. Assessor's Map/Parcel \ �� 2 •333 Er—L Et✓ `fir o (�s>.- /1 t=. Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. Des er's Name,Address and Tel.No.� �zSU�� vA� ? 4Z -3 � �� Os c��d LL-C Type of Building: A.,G Dwelling No.of Bedrooms 7 Lot Size Z,01 sq 4. Garbage Grinder(rip) Other Type of.Building No. of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow 770 gallons per day. Calculated daily flow ?70 gallons. Plan Date T-[—� Number of sheets Revision Date 't.io&A[_ Title 2Ua_y,_E0 S i p C. -cr_-oA Size of Septic Tank 'ZGCO ALL.© Ac 'L Type of S.A.S. Description of Soil C L C� M EDP t _ ,Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) V'P6eA{��. -C� FiZ,0&E L4 r Date last inspected:" Agreement: The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the Environmental Code and not to place the system in operation until a.Certifi- cate of Compliance has been isstyd by this Board Heal - --1 Signed ` ,e- Date x: c Application Approved by a Date Application Disapproved the following-r asons s' Permit No. Date Issued THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS (Certificate of (Compliance THIS IS TO CERTIFY,that the On-site Sewage Disposal S tern Constructed( )Repaired (K Upgraded( ) Abandoned( )by 3' ,; 1/C 1 > � GiL,k C� (�, ' at 33� CCU G 6 has been constructed in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 and the for Disposal System Construction Permit No. -•- dated Installer Designer , y The issuance of this p-rmit s 11 not be construed as a guarantee that the systemwilllllfunction as de_s'i"gnedd. /t / p �� fr'` Date `, Inspector � Y1'�f7 _�� Iil. W��h`�t�t A y ------------ No. Fee THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION - BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS lwi5posSal 6potem Con.5truction Permit a Permission is hereby granted to Construct( )Repairs(' / )Upgrade )LMO n( ) System located at �) � � V _j� �_n_l_wz—_ and as described in the above Application for Disposal System Construction Permit. The applicant recognizes his/her duty to comply with Title 5 and the following local provisions or special conditions. Provided:Construction mu t be c ' pleted within three years of the date of t s pe it. v') r 1/ G Date: Approved by / i TOWN OF BARNSTABLE LOCATION Fe` ,vc� ej SEWAGE # �� `3 n VILLAGE �i S it �.� .��c ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT-1111 � INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. 43. �io cp k s l, SEPTIC.TANK CAPACITY c9100 o 60 LEACHING FACILITY: (type),ODG")ICkAm L-j (T] (size) IJ-'X 3 NO. OF BEDROOMS BUILDER OR OWNER �A il2atil�+n i PERMITDATE: re �5- cco COMPLIANCE DATE: i Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table and Bottom of Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist j. within 300 feet of leaching facility) Feet i Furnished by t OPT J . tb t �� ly ( ) $ 1 TOWN O,pF BARNSTppABLE 'J-J 3 6 Pe� [Ct ue r 1�c� SEWAGE # \ V✓ LOCATION . VII AGE "G� �V b ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT L 15 INSTALLER'S NAME&PHONE NO. Lllk,170-44�d SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY M36 O-e-SS�Gb t_S LEACHING FACILITY: (type) (size) NO. OF BEDROOMS BUILDER - PERMITDATE: COMPLIANCE DATE: Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table.and Bottom of Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of leaching facility) Feet Furnished by C ow �.w rs; ,, �:� ,:�� _ , TOWN OF BARNSTABLE �d E /� LOCATION 333 CFe.� I C�v-r �� SEWAGE # ;Q 0— 3 ' `- �J VILLAGE C> 1 w .��e ASSESSOR'S MA.p & LOT rL INS`ftkLLER'S NAME&PHONE N0. SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY ®6,s ol 0 LEACHING FACILITY: (ty ),5ao IChAMbcP1{. 7� (size) /A,X63, NO.OF BEDROOMS BUILDER OR OWNER A C c % A kv) PERMIT DATE: TiL Q s-' .;000 COMPLIANCE DATE: Separation Distance Between the: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table and Bottom of Leaching Facility Feet Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feet Edge of Wetland and Leaching Facility(If any wetlands exist within 300 feet of leaching facility) Feet Furnished by o - -t-Q� �� An� �✓�\eta i Sullivan Engineering Inc. 7 Parker Road,P.O.Box 659 Osterville,MA 02655 Peter Sullivan P.E.Mass Registration No.29733 ' phone 508-428-3344 fax 508-428-3115 peter@sullivanengm.ccom Health Division January 6, 2010 Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis MA 02601 Re: Birmingham Residence y 333 Eel River Road, Osterville U11z Map 115, Parcel 002 , w 00 Dear Health Division This letter is to document the design flow rational that I used back in 1999 upgrae the on site septic system for the Birmingham's main house at 333 Eel River Road. On Ln October 26, 1998 I did a"walk thru"of the main house and arrived at a total room count of 15 rooms all which met the requirements of"room"as detailed in 310 CMR 15.002, Definitions, Bedroom. At that time for dwellings with more than 8 rooms there were two accepted ways for determining the number of bedrooms for septic design flow. One way was to count actual bedrooms in the dwelling,the other was to take the total room count not including bathrooms,hallways,unfinished cellars and unheated storage areas, divide that number by two and round down to the lowest whole number and that is the presumed bedroom count. In this case the total 15 room count reduces-to 7 bedrooms presumed. Although there were and presently are 11 actual bedrooms in the main house it seemed reasonable and practicable to design for 7 bedrooms. Sewage Permit 99-53 was issued for a 7 bedroom design. In 2001 the Hobby House was built as a detached,structure and it was considered to be an additional bedroom. As a result the septic system for the Main House was expanded to accept the additional Hobby House flow under Sewage Permit 2001-568. Lastly in 2005 a detached garage structure was built with 2 additional bedrooms. This structure has a separate septic system to handle its flow and was installed under Sewage Permit 2005-567. If you have any questions please feel free to call this office. truly yo dal Peter Sullivan PE SULLIVAN Sullivan Engineering, Inc. �o. 2 733 ST cc: Mrs. Birmingham Members of American Society of Civil Engineers and Boston Society of Civil Engineers Section 10-07-1999 04:27Pm CENT CST FIREDEPT 't5087902385 P.62 Make application to local Fire Department 00 Fire Department retains Original application and issues duprwae as Permit. IL I APPLICATION and PERMIT" F4e:-t25..00 for storage tank rerncvd- and transportation to approved tank disposal yard in accordance with the provisions I"of M.G.L. Chapter 1,16, Section 38A, 527 CMR 9,00, application is hereby r» by-, Tank Owns(Name(pie;,-e print) John Birmingham X 4 (tire j1f'Wt!Aq Address 333 Eel River Road, Osterville, MA 02655 41 Company Name Enviro-safe Enviro-Safe Co.or Individual Address P.O. Box 810, E. Sandwich, MA AddresPrmrs Signature(it --,r,P, 'inq: - A Signature(it P ) m I rina r /7 'A C1 I FCI Gene: Other lFCI Certified Other 333 Eel River Road, Osterville Tank Location Sta9t 1h -50151- #2 Fuel Ott Tank Capacity(gailcms Substanc-,Last Store-C Tank Dimensions iota,7'etv x length) Remarks7 Firm trgrsPcr1inq was---- Fnviro-Safe 329 MA —StateUc. #- W, 846767 Ha2ardous waste rrlariie= MAD985269323 E.P.A. N I Turner Salvage 002 Approved tank dispcscj,;Wl Tank yard , Ype of inert gas Tank yard address 235 Commercial Street, Lynn, MA City er'Town Centerville 01920 FD10# Permit# Date of issue September 28, 1999 Date of expiration. October 12, -1294 j Dig safe approval nurrzer- 19994003207 ,a I,IX e�T nber-8d0-3V 48-44 Signature 1ritle of Ghcsr r I granting permit AMer removal(s)send P---, --?-29OR signed by Local Fire Dept. to UST Regulatory Cornpll2r'C2 unit,One Ashburton Place, boom 1310, Boston, W- '8-1618, TOTAL P.02 5 CEFJTERVILLE-OSTERVK.LE-MARSTOFIyS MILLS FIRE DISTRICT 1875 ROUTE 28 CERTERVILLE,MA 02632 (508) 750-2380/FAXD(508) 790-2385 OIL/HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RELEASE FORM F.A.# 771 LOCATION: ADDRESS OF RELEASE: 333 EEL RIVER ROAD (BIRMINGHAM) OSTERVILLE DATE OF RELEASE: UNKNOWN PRODUCT RELEASED- FUEL OIL ESTIMATED QUANTITY- 111 OWN CORRECTO/E ACTION TAKEN BY RESPONSIBLE PARTY: PROPER NOTIFICATIONS I NOTIFICATIONS: FIRE DEPARTMENT: YES(X) NO( ) DATE- 10/7/99 TIME 0845 NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER YES( ) NOW D ATE: TIME: DEPT.OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION YES( ) NO(X) DATE: TIME: OIL SPILL COORDINATOR: YES(o?NO( 10 DATE:-TIME: TOWN BOARD OF HEALTH: YES(X) NO( ) DATE: 10/7/99TIME.0900 TOWN H ARBORM ASTER: YES( ) NO( )D DATE:-TIME: OTHER AGENCIES: COMMENTS• AFTER RETURNING TO FIRE STATION FROM THIS TANK REMOVAL, I RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE.REMA1 COMPANY RFP RFpngTI *r- THAT WHILE CLEAMG OUTSTDF OF TANK HE Fn ilm TFiRFF (Z) ONE (1) INCH HOLES IN TANKL HE RFPPORTFD THE TANK WOO ESSEKT AL Y CLEAN BUT HAD A S M 1 AMOMIT OF WATFR/nTT IRIRTITRE. HE DUG DOWN THREE (3) FEET INTO SOIL AND FOUND A ODER OF PRODUCT. I CONTACTED TOWN BOARD OF HEALTH TO EVALUATE THE SITE REPORTEDBY' 1 .(%� r � HATE: 10/7/99 r WHITE COPY-FIRE DEPARTMENT YELLOW COPY-D.E.P. PINK COPY-BOARD OF HEALTH C-O-MM FORM R58 ' REMEDIAL OPERATION PLAN STATUS REPORT II SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION MA DEP#4-15283 Birmingham Residence ' 333 Eel,River Road- Osterville, MA 02537 Project#B099-2533 FEBRUARY 28''2002 1 �1PENNETT9 1XE I L LY Inc. ' Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services OEII 1573 Main Street z�. Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line PO Box 1667 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Brewster. MA 02631 ' Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Consulting Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax of 1 . BENNETT A!" O 'REILLY, Inc. 1 _ ngineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line O PO Box 1667 ' Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Brewster, MA 02631 Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Licensed Site Professional Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax February 28, 2002 B099-2533 1 Mr. Dan Crafton, Case Officer MA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - SOUTHEAST REGION Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup/Emergency Response Section - 1 20 Riverside Drive - Lakeville, MA 02347 ' RE: REMEDIAL OPERATION PLAN STATUS REPORT [II] Phase IV Completion/Phase V Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring ' Class C- Response Action Outcome - RTN 4-15283 333 Eel River Road - Osterville, MA Dear Mr. Crafton, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., has prepared the following Report and Supporting ' Documentation as representing the Remedy Operation Plan Status(ROPS) [II]Report for the above referenced project, in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0893. This status report is being provided as a project update of the Comprehensive Response Actions conducted over the past ' six months,as consistent with the Phase IV modification discussed in the ISB Treatment Evaluation portion of the Remedy Operation Plan (ROP) Status Report [I] filed with the MA DEP (SERO), BWSC/ERS [Dan Crafton]dated August 3,2001. This document should be reviewed as an essential ' element, and continuation, of the work represented in the ROPS [I] Report, relative to on-going. efforts to reduce residual petroleum concentrations to below the applicable Method 1 - Risk ' Characterization standards and the continuing review of the established condition of"No Substantial Hazard"as the premise of the existing Class C - Response Action Outcome (RAO). This Report includes a Phase IV Completion Statement, as well as documentation of the ' Phase V Operation and Environmental Monitoring activities conducted in the period from October 2001 through January 2002, as associated with two chemical oxidant applications. Environmental ' monitoring through this period indicated that these chemical oxidant applications were responsible for a 40% reduction in fractional aromatic concentrations, as approaching the GW-I, Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. This data has also been used in the continuing evaluation of critical ' exposure pathways and Significant Risk as the basis of a Class A,Response Action Outcome(RAO) statement for project completion and regulatory closure as a permanent solution. 1 ' FEBRUARY 28,2002 BIRMINGHAM/BO99-2533 PAGE 2 OF 11 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS[II] All work has proceeded with LSP oversight in a manner consistent with the MCP Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS) pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0191 and QA/QC policies of ' BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. The facts and statements herein are,to the best of our knowledge, a true and accurate representation of the site activities,remedial response actions and environmental conditions associated with the project at the time of this report. As such, this document serves as ' the technical justification and rationale for the LSP Opinions represented by the certifications made on the Comprehensive Response Action-Remedy Operation Plan [BWSC-108] transmittal forms attached. BACKGROUND/ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING PP to Refer A endix A � 1 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property, identified on Barnstable Assessor's Map 115 as Parcel 2, is located tapproximately 1 mile south of the center of Osterville at 333 Eel River Road. The parcel contains some 2.10 acres of land originally developed in the early 1920's. The site presently contains a single ' family residential dwelling, detached garage, an out-building, and a shed. Access to the area of release is unrestricted. The surrounding neighborhood is moderately developed with similar residential dwellings. SITE HISTORY On October 7, 1999, in anticipation of the installation of an upgraded sewage disposal system, EnviroSafe, Corp., of East Sandwich, MA., was scheduled and permitted to removal an abandoned 1,000 gallon underground storage tank (UST) formerly used to store #2 fuel oil. According to the homeowners,the vessel had been abandoned for at least 28 years. Upon removal and subsequent cleaning of the vessel, substantial corrosion was noted with the removal of scaling revealing numerous holes along the bottom of the tank. BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., was subsequently contacted by EnviroSafe, Corp. to provide professional services relative to the investigation of the apparent fuel oil release. Soil samples collected through the bottom of hole (BOH)to a depth of 15'reported elevated concentrations of hydrocarbons throughout the BOH area, ' as exceeding the applicable RCS-1 Reportable Concentrations for soil. Based upon these laboratory results, a 120 day Notification Requirement and remedial response liability was identified. Three monitoring wells were later constructed within 20' of the release area and groundwater impact ' exceeding the Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards for fractional aromatics was identified in each of the wells. On February 10,2000,some 124 yards of contaminated.soil were excavated and some 1,494 gallons of impacted groundwater were evacuation from within the tank grave. The oxidant Regenesis ORC was subsequently introduced to bottom of hole soils to promote biological mineralization of residual petroleum hydrocarbons and a soil vapor extraction (SVE) system was constructed within the bottom of hole to serve as a sub-slab venting system. Representative samples ' ' collected from each exposure point at the extent of excavation reported low level residual ' FEBRUARY 28,2002 BIRMINGHAM/B099-2533 PAGE 3 OF 11 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS[II] ' contamination levels in each of the four sidewalls well below the applicable S-2/GW-1 Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards, as well as the most stringent S-1/GW-1 category to avoid an ' Activities and Use Limitation(AUL). The BOH sample was reported as Below Reportable Limits (BRL<33mg/Kg). Subsequent to soil removal and ORC treatment, all monitoring wells have consistently reported fractional EPH and target analytes concentrations as BRL with the exception of MW-3, located immediately downgradient(<20')of the area of soil removal. This well continues to report ' fractional aromatic and 2-methylnaphthalene concentrations as exceeding the GW-1 (ingestion), Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards. At no time has groundwater impact exceeded the GW-2 (inhalation)or GW-3 (direct contact)Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards in any of the on- site monitoring wells. HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS The subject property 3and surrounding areas are map ped as being within the Mashpee Pitted Plain glacial deposits(Oldale, 1986). Soils in this area consist primarily of unconsolidated stratified sands and gravel associated with glacial outwash. These sands and gravels were deposited by . meltwater in front(south)of the Buzzards Bay and Sandwich moraines during the Pliestocene period ' some 15,000 years ago. A series of eight hand borings, and five deep test borings to groundwater, have been conducted at the site. Borings show that stratified glacial sands are predominant in the area with no silt and clay strata encountered. The stratified sands and gravel displayed high permeability and groundwater in the shallow aquifer was noted as unconfined. Groundwater in the area of release is located some 15' (EL 2 +/-) below the existing grade. As part of our investigation, a series of slug tests was conducted to measure site specific hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer. The AQTESOLV software developed by Geraghty&Miller was used to enter field measurements of rising head to compute an average hydraulic conductivity of 215 ft/day. With an averaged hydraulic gradient of 0.0029ft/ft and an assumed porosity of 25%, ' a groundwater flow velocity of 2.49ft/day was established. Based on a 20%retardation factor,"Time of Travel" from the area of release to the down gradient monitor wells MW-4 and MW-5 is estimated at 40 days and 42 days, respectively., ' SENSITIVE RECEPTORS/EXPOSURE ROUTES The site and surrounding area are serviced by municipal water supply with no known private potable wells within 500' of the release area. The site is not located within the Zone II-Protective Radius of any public water supply or within 200'of any surface water reservoir. Groundwater was ' discovered at 15' below grade in the area of release. Site specific groundwater contours indicate a northwesterly to southwesterly groundwater flow direction toward Eel River, adjacent to the property, and out to West Bay. Eel River, located some 160'+/- west of the area of release, is FEBRUARY 28,2002 BIRMWGHAM/BO99-2533 PAGE 4 OF 1 l REMEDY OPERATION STATUS[II] ' considered the closest wetland and has been identified as the primary environmental receptor. The occupants of the on-site dwelling have been identified as potential receptors based upon the proximity of the structure to the area of release. Based upon the Sole Source Aquifer designation of Cape Cod,the GW-1,GW-2 and GW-3 groundwater categories appear to be applicable in review of exposure and risk characterization. Based upon frequency and intensity of use for soils below 3' in an unpaved area, the S-2/GW-1 soil category is applicable as most restrictive in review of exposure and risk characterization. The RCS-1 Reportable Concentration soil category is also applicable in review of response action performance,based upon the proximity of the release to the ' dwelling. The RCGW-1 Reportable Concentration is further applicable based upon the site's location within a Potential Drinking Water Source Area(PDWSA). ' In accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 4.0932(5)(b), however, the applicability of the GW-1 and RCGW-1 standards may be re-evaluated based upon no practical ingestion exposure pathways being present, and the persistence of marginal groundwater impact to a limited, discrete ' area. Based upon site specific conditions related to tidal influence,potential salt water intrusion in a coastal setting,proximity to the public and private water supplies,private land ownership,and non- zoning controls,the subject site may be redefined as a Non-Potential Drinking Water Source Area ' (NPDWSA)[Refer to Figure 4]. In the absence of practical exposure pathways to groundwater impact, a Method 3 Risk Characterization is also being considered [Refer to Appendix B]. ' PHASE IV COMPLETION STATEMENT } As discussed in the ROP Status Report [I], dated August 3, 2001, a copy of the Class C RAO/RIP Plan was forwarded to Lessard Environmental for technical review and project consultation in consideration of hydrogen peroxide as a chemical oxidant to treat persistent residual groundwater impact. Lessard recommended the injection of some 1,200 gallons of hydrogen peroxide for the chemical destruction of petroleum contaminants with the by-products of carbon dioxide and water, as well as heat energy generated through the chemical reaction. The existing SVE system was subsequently retro-fitted to serve as the distribution system for the chemical application. Lessard Environmental, Inc., began by injecting a catalyst solution ' consisting of approximately 5 lbs. of ferrous sulfate to the existing SVE port to allow for the hydrogen peroxide to be converted into the more reactive hydroxyl radicals,increasing the efficiency of the subsequent chemical oxidation treatment. A series of two hydrogen peroxide injections began on October 17 2001 J S with 600 gallons injected per event, as specified by Lessard Environmental, Inc., (LEI) for effective soil oxidation. The oxidant was distributed between SVE port, MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3. Various parameters including temperature and total organic vapor(TOV)concentrations were continuously monitored by Lessard personnel to ensure that the chemical reaction was occurring within an optimal temperature range. Monitoring well, MW-3, was sampled for EPH analysis and the prescribed groundwater quality parameters on October 22,2001 in review of the need for the second injection Laboratory analysis received October 31,2001 reported continued fractional aromatic and methyl- ' FEBRUARY 28,2002 BIRMINGHAM/B PAGE 5 OF 11 099-2533 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS[II] naphthalene impact exceeding the applicable GW-1 Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards, indicating the need for an additional injection event. The second injection took place in the same manner as the first on October 31, 2001. ' Site ins pections and environmental monitoring over the past six months have shown the chemical oxidant delivery system to have been installed and operated in a manner consistent with the Remedial Operation Plan (ROP) modification described in the ROP Status Report (I) dated August 3, 2001, and in accordance with the applicable requirements of 310 CMR 40.0870. Furthermore, the Phase IV performance standards described in 310 CMR 40.0872 have been met. PHASE V OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ' SITE INSPECTIONS [Refer to Appendix B] As consistent with the Operation,Maintenance and Environmental Monitoring Plan set forth in the Remedy Implementation Plan, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., has conducted periodic inspections at the subject site,the details of which are presented on Inspectors Daily Record of Work Progress Reports #24 through#29. At the time of quarterly inspection, all existing monitor wells were gauged for groundwater flow determination and field tested for total organic vapors,dissolved oxygen,and pH/temperature/conductivity.A groundwater sample was collected from MW-3 at each inspection for laboratory analysis of EPH to track remedial performance. During semi=annual inspection conducted January 10, 2002, all wells were sampled and tested for EPH to evaluate any solute migration in review of potential critical exposure pathways, as well for wet chemistry to monitor water quality through the "time of travel" following the final application of the chemical oxidant. ' ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING [Refer to Appendix B and Appendix D] Remedial Monitoring y At the time of quarterly inspection, on November 13, 2001, a groundwater sample was collected from MW-3 in order to monitor current fractional EPH concentrations in the evaluation of performance associated with the chemical oxidant injections. Fractional EPH analysis received November 30, 2001 reported an aromatic concentration of 230mg/L, approaching the applicable ' GW-1 Method 1 - Risk Characterization standard of 200mg/Kg, as representing a 39%reduction in concentration over previous analysis. ' Supplemental fractional EPH sampling was conducted at monitoring well, MW-3, on December 17, 2001 to further qualify an apparent reduction in aromatic concentrations. On December 24,2001,BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.,received laboratory analytical which reported' ' an additional reduction in the aromatic concentration to 220mg/Kg, totaling an overall 40% reduction. A slight reduction in methyl-naphthalene was also reported (34ug/1), as remaining significantly above the GW-1 standard (1 Oug/L). FEBRUARY 28,2002 BIRMINGHAMBD99-2533 PAGE 6 OF 11 REMEDY OPERATION ST:STUS[II] Semi-annual EPH testing of all monitoring wells was conducted on January 10, 2002, as through the time of travel for MW-4 and MW-5 from the final chemical oxidant injection conducted October 31, 2001. This testing further included polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds(BTEX)analysis,as consistent with the MA DEP VPH/EPH Gu_dance Document. Subsequent EPH analysis reported a marginal increase in the fractional aromatic compound at MW-3 with a concentration of 280mg/Kg and a slight decrease in 2-methylnaphthalene to 27 ug/L. These concentrations continue to marginally exceed the applica5le GW-1 Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. Trace concentrations of acenaphthene,fluorene,and phenar.hrene ' were also reported, though well below the applicable standards. All other wells, as lateral to or further downgradient of MW-3,reported fractional EPH and PAH concentrations as BRL. BTEX concentrations were reported as BRL for all five monitoring wells. The analytical data for groundwater analysis is summarized on Table I with the appl- _cable Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards for the applicable GW-1, GW-2 and GW-3 categories. TABLE I:SUMMARY OF EPH ANALYSIS METHOD 1-RISK CHARACTERIZATION:GROUNDWATER DATE/ GROUNDWATER Standard jug/L.) , FRACTIONS MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW4 MW-5 310 CUR 40.0974(2); GW-1/GW-2/GW ' 2/29/00 C9 to C18 BRL(<530) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) NA NA 4,000/1,000/20 000 C19 to C36 BRL(<530) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 5,000/NA/20,000 Cl I to c22 BRL(<200) BRL(<200) 370' 200/1,000./20,000 4/6/00 A C9 to C18 BRL(<520) BRL(<540) BRL(<530) NA NA 4,000/1,000/20 000 C19 to C36 BRL(<520) BRL(<540) BRL(<530) 5,000/NA/20,000 C11 to c22 BRL(<200) BRL(<200) 610 200/1,000/20,000' M-Naphthalene BRL(<5) BRL(<5) 87 M-Naphthalene 10 Naphthalene All others All targets All others All targets>20 Phenanthrene BRL(<10) BRL(<11) BRL(<10) Acenaphthene C9 to C18 BRL(<560) BRL(<590) BRL(<530) BRL(<530) BRL(<530) 4,000/1,000/20 000 C19 to C36 BRL(<560) BRL(<590) BRL(<530) BRL(<530) BRL(<530) 5,000/NA/20,000 Cl 1 to c22 BRL(<200) BRL(<200) 360 BRL(<200) BRL(<200) 200/1,000/20,000 I C9 to C18 BRL(<500) BRL(<530). BRL(<530) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 4,000/1,000R0 000 C19 to C36 BRL(<500) BRL(<530) BRL(<530) BRL(<500) BRL(<530) 5,000/NA/20,000 _ Cl 1 to c22 BRL(<200) BRL(<200) 390 BRL(<200) BRL(<200) 200/1,000/20,000 ' 11/22/00 C9 to C18 BRL(<630) BRL(<530) BRL(<530) BRL(<560) BRL(<500) 4,000/1,000/20 000 C19 to C36 BR14<630) BR1(<530) BRL(<530) BRL(<560) BR1(<500) 5,000/NA/20,000 Cl I to C22 BRL(<200) BRL(<200) 570 BR1(<200) BRL(<200) 200/1,000/20,000 M-Naphthalene BRL(<6) BRL(<5) 48 BRL(<6) BRL(<5) M-Naphthalene 10 e All Others All others All others All others All others All others A0 targets>20 s BRL(<13) BRL(<11) BRL(<-I1) BRL(<11) BRL(<10) 7/10/01 s ' C9 to C 18 BRL(<530) BRL(<520) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 4,000/1,000/20 000 C19 to C36 BRL(<530) BRL(<520) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) 5,000/NA/20,000 Cl 1 to C22 BRL(<170) BRL(<170) 380 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) 200/1,000/20,000 I e ' FEBRUARY 28,2002 BIRMINGHAM/13099-2533 PAGE 7 OF 11 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS[111 TABLE I:SUMMARY OF EPH ANALYSIS METHOD 1-RISK CHARACTERIZATION:GROUNDWATER 10/22/01 C9 to C18 BRL(<560) 4,000/1,006no 000 ' C19 to C36 NTNT BRL(<560) NTNT 5,000/NA/20,000 Cl1 to C22 380 200/1,000/20,000 M-Naphthalene 38 M-Naphthalene 10 All Others All others All targets>20 " BRL(<11) 11/13/01 C9 to C18 NT NT BRL(<530) NT NT 4,000/1,000/20,000 C19 to C36 BRL(<530) 5,000/NA20,000 Cl I to C22 230 200/1,000/20,000 12/17/01 C9 to C18 BRL(<560) 4,000/1,000/20,000= C19 to C36 NT NT BR1(<560) NT NT 5,000/NA20,000 CI I to C22 220 200/1,000/20,000 M-Naphthalene 34 M-Naphthalene 10 All Others All others All targets>20 BRL(<11) 1/10/02 _ C9 to C18 BRL(<500). BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<530) 4,000/1,000/20,000 C19 to C36 BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<500) BRL(<530) 5,000/NA20,000 Cl 1 to C22 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) 280 BRL(<160) BRL(<160) 200/1,00020,000 M-Naphthalene 27 M-Naphthalene 10 N Acenaphthene All BRL All BRL 1.4 All BRL All BRL Fluorene (<0.5ug/L) (<0.5ug/L) 1.6 (<0.5ug/L) (<0.5ug/L) All other PAHs>20 Phenanthrene 0.9 All other PAH All BTEX All BRL All BRL All BRL All BRL All BRL All BTEX>5 (<lug/L) (<lug/L) (<lug/L) (<lug/L) , (<lug/L) EPH'=Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon BRL=Below Reporting Limits/NT=Not Tested/NA=Not Available ' Shaded area represents applicable Method 1-Risk Characterization Standards BOLD text indicates concentrations exceeding applicable standards Groundwater Ouali1y Monitoring On October 2, 2001, BENNETT & O REILLY, INC., sampled monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4 and MW-5 for baseline groundwater quality prior to the injection of any remedial additives, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0046. Select groundwater parameters included pH, dissolved iron, chloride, sulfate, dissolved oxygen (DO), hydrogen peroxide and total organic carbon (TOC), as recommended by Lessard Environmental for chemical oxidant treatment. Monitoring well, MW-3, was sampled for the above described water quality parameters ' subsequent to the initial injection event of October 17,2001. Groundwater quality analysis received November 2, 2001 reported a marginal increase in sulfate and TOC at MW-3. It should be noted that there is no regulatory standard promulgated for the identified presence of TOC in groundwater, as associated with the oxidant reaction with petroleum hydrocarbons. Furthermore, the reported sulfate.concentration(40.9 mg/L'), likely associated with the catalyst application,is well below the applicable Secondary Maximum Concentration Level (SMCL) of 250mg/L. All other parameters remained consistent with background concentrations. i FEBRUARY 28,2002 BIRMINGHAM/13099-2533 PAGE 8 OF 11 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS[II] Water quality sampling was again conducted at the time of quarterly inspection on November 13, 2001, following the latest injection event of October 31, 2001. Laboratory analytical received November 26, 2001 indicated moderated sulfate and TOC concentrations with each reported parameter consistent with the previous round of groundwater quality sampling. To further evaluate the effects of the remedial additive applications`at down gradient monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5,as intermediate to the resource area,time of travel calculations were revisited. With an averaged hydraulic gradient of 0.0029ft/ft and an assumed porosity of 25%, a groundwater flow velocity of 2.49ft/day was established. Based on a 20%retardation factor,"time of travel" from the area of release to the down gradient monitor wells, MW-4 and MW-5, was estimated at 40 days and 42 days, respectively. As such, in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0046, groundwater quality sampling was conducted at MW-4 and MW-5 at the time of semi-annual testing on January 10, 2002, as through the "time of travel" from the final chemical oxidant injection conducted October 31, 2001. Laboratory analytical received January 17, 2002, reported a significant decrease in the TOC and sulfate concentrations at MW-3, as representing a return to baseline conditions and the completion of the chemical reaction within the localized groundwater. Groundwater Quality Parameters at Mw3 In review of baseline conditions Remedial Additive Assessment compared to the most recent water ' so quality data collected at MW-4, a pH sustained increase in chloride and 40 �- F' '- _W- sulfate is noted. Both the reported ''� Iron ' sulfate concentration(31.6 mg/L),noted Chloride as likely associated with the catalyst E application, and the reported chloride a� _f Sulfate concentration (150mg/L), likely Do associated with salt water intrusion from Eel River,are well below the applicable ' 10 --� ^� Peroxide Secondary Maximum Concentration 7—0 TOC Levels (SMCL) of 250mg/L. All other 17-oct-01 22-opt-01' Date 13-Nov-01 10-Jan-02 parameters at MW-3 and MW-4,as well as all parameters at MW-S, were GRAPH 1: A review of the most recent groundwater quality reported as consistent with baseline analysis at MW-3 indicates all reported parameters are consistent conditions. As such, this most recent ' with baseline data, substantiating no significant degradation of sampling substantiated no significant groundwater associated with the use of the chemical oxidant. degradation of groundwater associated with the use of the chemical oxidant. Chemical Oxidant Performance & Risk Characterization ' This report has documented the chemical oxidant treatment of groundwater and environmental monitoring conducted over the past six months. EPH sampling conducted at MW-3 ' FEBRUARY 28,2002 BIRMINGHAM/13099-2533 PAGE 9 OF 11 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS[II] in November and December of 2001 confirmed an approximate 40% decrease in fractional aromatics, with concentrations just marginally exceeding the applicable GW-1 standards. Based upon this data, it appears that the chemical oxidant treatment has been effective in reducing contaminant concentrations at MW-3 to level approaching the GW-1 Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. A slight Fractional Aromatic Tracking Chart increase in this concentration in the latest °"to C22 sampling conducted in January 2002, 700 however, indicates that the chemical reaction responsible for this reduction has been completed. As such, additional App6eation applications are warranted to further reduce t400 .� — -- concentrations of the heavier hydrocarbon, '3M as represented by the C 11 to C22 fractional :.._lt aromatics and the target analyte 2- methylnaphthalene, . to below GW-1 100 standards. 0 Ap 0 Jul-M Jan-0 AprikOl NoAlOc1.99 Jar00 Data While most recent testing conducted W1 �MW2- MW3 January 10, 2002, indicates persistent low- level dissolved phase impact marginally GRAPH 2; This graph illustrates the significant decrease in exceeding the GW-1 drinking water fractional aromatics at MW-3 subsequent to the two initial standards at MW-3, no practical exposure chemical oxidant applications. routes have been identified. The site and surrounding area are serviced by town water with no private potable drinking water wells within 500'. Furthermore, USGS Water Supply Investigation excludes the area from potential water supply development on the premise of salt water intrusion. The absence of groundwater impact at MW-4 and MW-5 as down gradient and intermediate to the Eel River further substantiate a condition of no substantial release migration and no exposure risk to the wetland resource itself or any fisheries interests. As such, there is no practical exposure risk presently associated with the consumption of groundwater by humans or environmental receptors nor is there any practical exposure associated with future use of the property. It is noted that EPH,PAHs and BTEX concentrations have remained substantially below the GW-2 and GW-3 standards over the entire course of the investigation, as representing inhalation ' and dermal contact exposure risk to identified human and environmental receptors. Background conditions established in all other monitoring wells define a limited area of groundwater impact in the vicinity of MW-3. Based upon these considerations wherein the presence of low-level groundwater impact does not represent a current exposure risk to identified receptors, and the presence of such contamination does not represent a significant risk of harm to health,safety,public welfare or the environmental if it continued to be present over the next several years,a condition of "no substantial hazard" continues to be applicable to the subject site. f FEBRUARY 28,2002 BIRMINGHAM/BO99-2533 PAGE 10 OF 11 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS[1I] FUTURE PHASE V OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING In review of project closure objectives,a copy of the Class C RAO/RIP Plan and most recent laboratory analysis was forwarded to Risk Management, Y g ment, Inc., for technical review of Method 3 - Risk Characterization relative to site specific conditions wherein no practical exposure to any receptor has been identified. According to the review received by BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC., dated February 7,2002,Risk Management feels that,based upon current site conditions,the project could likely be closed within the MCP under a Method 3 application. Based upon the nearly 40%reduction in fraction aromatics following two initial injections, however,project closure under a Method 3 was determined to be inappropriate by the homeowner at this time and insurance coverage was subsequently granted for supplemental chemical oxidant applications. According to a technical review of laboratory data conducted by Lessard Environmental,two additional applications are now recommended to reduce fractional aromatic and M-naphthalene concentrations below Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards meeting project closure objectives. These supplemental applications are now being scheduled with Lessard Environmental. In accordance with 310 CMR 40.0046, downgradient monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4 and/or MW-5 will be sampled for groundwater quality parameters following each injection. Monitoring well, ' MW-3, will be sampled for EPH following the second supplemental injection. Upon receipt of laboratory analytical indicating that fractional aromatic and 2-methylnaphthalene concentrations have been reduced to below the applicable standards, a final round of sampling will be conducted at all ' wells through the"time of travel"to substantiate that a permanent solution has been achieved for the filing of a Class A - RAO under Method 1- Risk Characterization. If, however, the prescribed supplemental chemical oxidant application does not achieve closure objectives under Method 1,the ' Method 3 - Risk Characterization will be re-visited for project closure prior to the next filing deadline [September 5, 2002] . SUMMARY& CONCLUSIONS This report has documented the chemical oxidant treatment of groundwater and 1 environmental monitoring conducted over the past six months. While the most recent EPH sampling conducted at MW-3 has confirmed a significant reduction in fractional aromatic compounds at concentrations marginally exceeding the applicable GW-1 standards,this data also indicates that the chemical oxidant applied in the former area of release,which resulted in a 40%decrease in aromatic concentrations over a one month period,has ceased. As such,two supplemental hydrogen peroxide injections have been recommended and will proceed as the most effective and efficient course of action to establish a permanent solution for the filing of a Class A - RAO under Method 1 -Risk Characterization. ' This report sets forth the rationale and technical justification for the Phase IV Completion J p Statement as documenting implementation of the modified Remedial Operation Plan in accordance r ' with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0879. This report further includes the review and interpretation r ' FEBRUARY 28,2002 BIRMINGHAM/13099-2533 PAGE I 1 OF 11 REMEDY OPERATION STATUS[III ' of the Phase V Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring activities for performance evaluation and risk assessment, and a review to substantiate that a "substantial hazard" is not present. The LSP Opinions offered herein, are established by the certifications made on the attached BWSC-108 ' Transmittal Form. The LSP Opinions rendered rely upon the available data as obtained directly,or by competent professionals under my supervision, as may be limited by the regulations in effect at the time of this reporting. This Remedy Operation Plan Status Report has been copied P p p ed to the Individuals as noted below to satisfy the Public Involvement requirements of 310 CMR 40.0428(1). If you have any questions regarding this submittal, or need additional information, please contact me directly at our office. V ly yours, B NN ILLY, INC D eft, LSP Kara Risk ES 11 Director o En ' nmental Project Manager ' cc: John& Karen Birmingham, Owners Joanne Benson, CHUBB & SONS INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. Barnstable Health Department Centerville, Osterville, Marstons Mills Fire Department Barnstable Chief Municipal Officer , i 1 REMEDIAL OPERATION PLAN STATUS REPORT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION MA DEP#4-15283 Birmingham Residence 333 Eel River Road- Osterville, MA 02537 ' Project#B099-2533 FEBRUARY 28,2002 ' Prepared By: BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC. 1573 Main Street- P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 David C. Bennett, LSP. Prepared For: MA. Department of Environmental Protection . Southeast Regional Offices, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup/Emergency Response Section 20 Riverside Drive -Lakeville, MA. 02347 On Behalf Of: John&Karen Birmingham 333 Eel River Road - Osterville, MA 02655 APPENDIX A: Reference Plans -Figure 1: Site Locus Plan(USGS Topographic Quad., Osterville, MA). . - Figure 2: Hydrologic Map (CCPEDC, 1993) - Figure 3: MA DEP BWSC GIS Map(1997) - Figure 4: Ident. of Potential Water-Supply Areas of the Cape Cod Aquifer(GIS-1994) - Site Plan RAOC-2 Entitled"...Remedial Operation Plan Modification", Prepared by BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC., Dated 01/03/02 APPENDIX B: Field Reports - Field Inspection Reports [#24 through#29 (10/02/01 through 1/10/02)] - Monitor Well Sampling Logs [11/13/01, 1/10/02] - Revised Time of Travel Calculations ' APPENDIX C: Chemical Oxidant Performance -Fractional Aromatic Tracking Chart- Groundwater Analysis (10/99-1/02) - Groundwater Quality Parameters Chart - Lessard Environmental, Inc. Report"Chemical Oxidation Application Summary" dated 03/14/02 - Risk Management Incorporation"MCP Method 3 Risk Characterization Proposal" APPENDIX D: Environmental Records/Permits - Comprehensive Response Action Transmittal Form, BWSC-108 k APPENDIX E: Laboratory Analysis - Laboratory Analysis (10/01-1/02) APPENDIX F: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan I � � APPENDIX A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I 1 R f r'^ � i�.Yr;. i '�',,. r kakv, a,n'�A r • .i ■� a 'i� - ;f'L Car„ � �xyi J�' g. �;r ,. �r +..+, � 3 � • f1� r.�"• � ��iFG t,y � •i Y pr# G Q q� �f�q�$ � ._. tip. ,� i'r.... r� f +�,. i � z'7.,�s .,. 5O� � iv+•I.�` 1R IG K; �. - � � � �and�•T4 °�� '. i� � i reMa� ! -a i�t d'� iP a'"9 �'d � y, .�, � '` ' a=k-`= �"14' '� A�# G � t �G y. ra',- ��.,, tP��•3��ti��• ��,,• °� ,,;! fyf Vl A - y +r a .y,1. � R..` ` '°+-•'° i' � .•-,��,^^�' � r.,.- i 43i � a `"�_,`d5i^ �� -`y � �� < ',� a a � a Ott Y� ; * �a.� �o7L �r ��i 4• l f � � i� �he 3�,�`, ,�r' . •_ re ��' �' $ t •L' Y F'q!p �* � 7�, � � t � 7 G i �1..�} Za�'. � '� Fi � �� ''�'a''tS�s<. a� s+ k ��1�R f r��h a4:. a�'r �1 ,• �`r��t�, �r:C iS f y � � s � �� »•��•. rt* $cMr� i4r-•� .�v �rya „q, _ ,�`� � .�,�y z. x,. ."'r� "r'C�r �L �;4; fir, •.5 'U,. cl 9,--`" ,+d'J /': ,• ,yam �� / � � - ;A'rr f•} f >b 4 i °v sfM �fl tStl:K.d�Y'�.-f`N gutai .q L� A' �y` 4,i a'4� �� ,r�p�p �h`� t `._ Ma�r '. �S.M 'r c.i� s.+r� ai�'t� '}s��^' f.•b. '`'.. 'i'2� v.J ,} 5.:. v: v*" " r �" 'T s r' :�'•rf _5 y �, c,� _ Zt i t• , I� r r i°" �v a1y `ti '� V £R1•r�f J.�i4 ,:F r •/r,�'� � '�"� Mat � f 4,,�+ �s � �• k 1yry ,�ITS•} � rly� s'�t � •tn�"��r�_ ,(y.,�iyr � `� f�w rxy� �• a_. ,s A �°r. �" `'''� � ��,� ,,�" .i R a � ��• n;fin . � a �� W; �y5, .r C+�`'�U.T" ,ntP.± s r�� Tx t�r{ t'�rti'•i y I�{� �i"y: a.,�' � a s. •uc,'� �`� .L'd 3��y r a. •}4 ;, s. R C` (_ v b'h "",Y"'4' :r'� ,i Yi} �5 q G� ,� r��. ,� ,:. ru �.:,�• z{ �ti n'' ^4a 7�� ,�v„'x1+��' L!a'+� i:,� �t ��7,A l �' ' JgYf 4'4 ��}d 4 '+T � +N { •pa �� A `�1�' - r /- ' a } -� v7 �.. .�r R4. r ♦ u �J frrq 4 :1 's l'I _ ,k� �`,�" � fi{. • s'�0:, 9,: 7r Shy �l •f,., �— � �.7',2-�� ti � <, 'i �/t�' � .�vs-i� i ti)ia c, m` k i�-'� �'4< �a -'} F = ,':sa./d4ti:: rt Printed from Td6! 1998 Wildflower Productions(www.to o.com) FIGURE 1: The subject site, located at 333 Eel River Road, contains a single family residential dwelling,a detached garage,and a shed on some 2.01 acres of land. The site is directly adjacent to Eel River and West Bay, which abut the property to the west. The surrounding neighborhood is moderately developed with similar residential dwellings. , b 1 \ an ato O Q° M. I , � iAl n O z �• ' auk• � � �� t r�� h � I Eo ' o/n � +f 15� `,+ `I f'btad � J'-- d•Q` 3 LOCUS t \� r b o �:. � nY2 d.am ✓ ti:4ai l Yssftwn A. M. 1 ' FIGURE 2: Groundwater was discovered at 15' below grade at the point of release. Regional groundwater contours indicate a southerly groundwater flow direction toward Nantucket Sound,with strong tidal influence stemming from West Bay. West Bay,located adjacent to the property,approximately 160' ' west of the area of release, is also considered the closest wetland. Re IN;IN *'�; i�►'e iM1�11,��11��1 8(� I TMIC. �� i 1:11 a 111fiii�,Ei qil , �� .; ��►..11111\�,1��11 111� �a� ,�.;�m� �,�1 �' JT q� ilR. ii�'� y�' 11 WIFE RRI gr �. . . .. . 11 . . . . ,., PPIIIAPY APIN➢Wi pptiLYnAt. • pay-u�j� ' fe � / �y ry Y Y '�,�I� ` 1' . 1 nIRI1C NA1T.x SIIWLY � (�lY�' �i J� - ; 1. APMA�Tn1I.IMITAliONR � � ✓ �� , � �R 1 ' - 1,. ON nlR inll�YlA1.rOP ,/r � - T � r / n pt1 v �� >♦ � �,6 Rr L `® na,nw.dw f r�C � ✓ j' .i �, .,✓ ,ray"f f �td f, y '..� ,,�T.k ., f �,�r .+�, f � rx t r r r,r z!✓ ,,d '�-L L n r l �,_-ry.�y, I1muu0.urW mruM UlLm zme / A ,�C.Q ,y • F J` rr 1 c , , IwaW ulnru,lwmt+n,mr. /� � 'S- r r � t, ✓ r ✓ 4 ;e w r W r f ✓ Ly`! yM`h, / � A ;•� +v ? / / � x +Al ij'r` Y+ i y /Y{/vrsl+♦ �M1 / i�✓ .✓ y .rl7�Y 1 ,4u�. • 'B�yy�`a LOCUS 4,, A N! Elp ha � FIGURE 4: According to the Identification of Potential Water-Supply Areas ofthe Cape Cod Aquifer(GIS-1994), the subject property at 333 Eel River Road,is located well within a potential salt water intrusion zone. ' As such, the area is noted as having the greatest degree of limitation associated with its potential development as a public water supply. A 1 1 a 1 1 1 0 O � 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,1 Columbian® Silver Spring?Recycled Kraft Minimum W/o Post-Consumer Fiber r___:,k0L)MDV4ATER WELL F-00 F r.W, S.W, 1F 14 z 7 n • 0,s. r 1�, 0 dlgo M\ov- �, i I G .? I T�L ------ AREA V r_�,AA VA. p I 0,6 lL7ErZ. CLZAT14 WIA OF CA E-)%Al I e.A L AIDS4A Ll F oo O�I C) �P L ICA Wh 1,-7 (1,8;;. 7 TrAjS' AAVY j 1�131 14.fo-q �'t -'T + + 4 A IFEA 0 F 0 P-CI_50 I L W MAI- 11 1 ra.z 1 4- le 4 11 i,4 All mw- 4 tJ t ' k-Dull L T I mW- 4.,!' �4o 12 it. LT ?_P_16�AT,r,,-J W ELL G#4 PA IF J ul"F_ TAT ox 94 1 TE 1 /mw I I , A;,tk X L�Ime Tr� ?,03e)lr Aj W,T)N Cl VV E.-L. I)kj (FLILA 11L ATA or. *Z_ �7. ��)(i pA—, ,^rJ TVEATME��, Vl� TY,��IhAloi - 0 t-7 4C, T F 116 tCALE PROJECI V-1 A L'S 15 fA vq FF L P_po y I TITLE z��LA_S_% C_ - SZF.S.Foxlsc OUT_e-0WF- RT0410l T 7-0 6Pa)NPVYAT ---P— e*4L:S PP4� hAw (mW-1 BENNETTA O'REILLY Inc Q. Engineering & Environmental Services G T ill 79 1111111111,11 IS73 Main Street Route6A SCA(,e'. i P.O Box 1667 508-896-6630 Office Brewster, MA 02631 SOS-896.4687 FAx DATE. SCALE BY CHECK JOB NUMBER. Ot- 1 1 1 � APPENDIX B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 BENNETT & OIREILLY, Inc. REPORT NUMBER:124 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax ' Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS ' Job Number: BO 99-2533 Date: 10/2/01 4 Job Name: Birmingham Residence ' Feature: Remedy Operation Plan Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.;LESSARD ENVIRONMENTAL Type of Work: Assessment i ' Weather Conditions: Sunny,mild Temperature: 70F Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) ' BENNETT&O'REILLY:Kara Risk-Project Manager/Environmental Scientist II,John Tadema-Wielandt-Environmental Scientist I;Lessard:Jeanette Gartner ' Equipment in use or idled(identify which) None ' Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed 3 groundwater quality samples as representing baseline conditions ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems, inspections of previously reported deficiencies None tSummary of construction activities 9:00 am BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.personnel arrive at site. Purge and sample MW-3,MW-4 and MW-5 for select water quality parameters. Met by Lessard Environmental personnel who prepared to inject 5 lbs. ferrous sulfate at soil vapor extraction sampling port to prepare area for subsequent peroxide injections to be conducted 10/10/01. 9:45 am Leave Lessard personnel'to complete injection. Will fax additional copy of site plan,per request of Lessard personnel. BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. REPORT NUMBER:1 25 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax ' Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 10/17/01 Job Name: Birmingham Residence Feature: Remedial Operation Plan Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.;Lessard Environmental;Enviro Safe Corp. Type of Work: Insitu Chemical Oxidant Treatment Weather Conditions: Sunny,breezy Temperature: 55F Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) ' BENNETT&O'REILLY: Kara Risk -Environmental Scientist II;Lessard: 1 Hydrogeologist, 1 Environmental Technician;Enviro Safe: 1 laborer Equipment in use or idled(identify which) Clear plastic hose,green hose,hand pump,monitoring equipment(Lessard) ' Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed' 12-55 gallon drums hydrogen peroxide(600 gallons) ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems, inspections of previously reported deficiencies None ' Summary of construction activities 9:15 am BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.personnel arrive at site. Met by Lessard and Enviro Safe personnel. ' Review injection points with Lessard including primary injection of 400 gallons at soil vapor extraction sampling port and secondary injection of 65-70 gallons each directly to MW-1,MW-2 and MW-3. Lessard to use MW-4 and MW-5 for monitoring. 11:00 am Leave site. k BENNETT & OIREILLY Inc. REPORT NUMBER:126 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS ' Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 10/31/01 Job Name: Birmingham Residence ' Feature: Remedial Operation Plan Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.;EnviroSafe;Lessard Enviromental ' Type of Work: Insitu Chemical Oxidation Treatment Weather Conditions: Sunny Temperature: 50F Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification, including Subcontractor personnel) BENNETT&O'REILLY: Genghis Burdulis-Environmental Technician;Lessard Environmental:2 technicians; EnviroSafe: 2 laborers Equipment in use or idled(identify which) ' Clear plastic hose,garden hose,hand pump,monitoring equipment(Lessard) Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed ' 12-55 gallon drums of Hydrogen Peroxide(600 gallons) Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies None Summary of construction activities 9:50 am BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.personnel arrive at site. Review day's activities with Lessard crew ' and EnviroSafe crew. UInstruct them to inject 3 -55 gallon drums into each of the three wells(MW-1,MW-2, MW-3)and the SVE sample port. ' 10:20 am Begin injection into SVE port. Start removal of shed and compressor. Remove sparge point and cap it off. Load shed and compressor into truck and remove lines from-ground. Injections continuing. 12:00 pm Break for lunch. ' 12:30 pm Return to property.Lessard completes injections and begins monitoring temperature,etc. 1:00 pm Leave site. 4F ` I - BENNETT & O'"ILLY, Inc. IREPORT NUMBER:1 27 ' 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax ' Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS ' Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 11/13/01 Job Name: Birmingham ' Feature: Remedy Operation Plan Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. Type of Work: Quarterly inspection Weather Conditions: Sunny Temperature: 45F Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) Kara Risk Environmental Scientist II,Genghis Burdulis-Environmental Technician Equipment in use or idled(identify which) ' HNU PI-101,water gauge,dissolved oxygen meter,pH/conductivity/temperature meter Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed 1 EPH, 1 groundwater quality ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies Note SVE vent removed from roof line ' Summary of construction activities 1:30 pm BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.personnel arrive at site to conduct quarterly inspection. Gauge and ' screen all monitoring wells. Note chemical oxidant odor at MW-1,MW-2 and MW-3. Slight weathered fuel odor noted at MW-3. ' Property owner indicates driveway being prepared for paving. Will move away from MW-1 and MW-2 to protect wells. Owner also wants to move tree at MW-3. ' 3:00 pm Sample MW-3. ' 3:30 pm Leave site. ' BENNETT & OIREILLY, Inc. REPORT NUMBER:128 ' 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax ' Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK.PROGRESS ' Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 12/26/01 Job Name: Birmingham Feature: Remedy Operation Plan Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. Type of Work: Assessment/Monitoring ' Weather Conditions: Fair Temperature: 55F Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification, including Subcontractor personnel) ' Genghis Burdulis-Environmental Technician Equipment in use or idled(identify which) ' None. r Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed 1 EPH with target PAHs Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies ' None Summary of construction activities 11:00 am ' BENNETT _&0 REILLY,INC.personnel arrive at site. Purge and sample MW 3 for EPH analysis. Secure well and leave site. F i BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. REPORT NUMBER:129 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax ' Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS ' Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 1/10/02 Job Name: Birmingham Residence Feature: Remedy Operation Plan Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. Type of Work: Semi-annual testing ' Weather Conditions: Clear,mild Temperature: 50F Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) ' Kara Risk-Project Manager/Environmental Scientist II,Genghis Burdulis-Environmental Technician Equipment in use or idled(identify which) ' HNU PI-101,Solinst groundwater gauge,dissolved oxygen meter,pH/conductivity/temp gauge Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed 5 EPH,.3 groundwater quality(MW-3,MW-4,MW-5), 5 BTEX(if required) ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems, inspections of previously reported deficiencies Note SVE vent replaced with turbine above roof line Summary of construction activities 10:15 am BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.personnel arrive at site to conduct semi-annual sampling. Gauge, ' screen and sample all monitoring wells. Note light sheen at MW-3,MW-1, MW-2. Sample all wells for EPH and BTEX. Sample MW-3,MW-4, MW-5 for groundwater quality. Secure wells. ' 12:00 pm Leave site. Forward samples to laboratory with instructions to hold BTEX sample pending EPH results. T S - BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc, MONFOR WELL SAMPLING LOG 1573 Main Street,P.O. Box 1667 Engineering and Environmental Services Brewster,MA 02631 (508) 896-6630 CLIENT Birmingham DATE(S) 11/13/01 LOCATION 333 Eel River Rd., Osterville JOB # B099-2533 SAMPLER Kara Risk-ES II, Genghis Burdulis-ET MEASURING POINT: Groundsurface or T.O.C. T.O.C. Elev. of Total Standing Water Water Table Depth Depth to Static Volume HNU Dissolved Well reference Conductivity Temperature of Water Volume Purged PI-101 pH Oxygen Comments: Number point Well (Feet) Height Elevation (gallons) (gallons) (ppm) (mgfL) (PS/cm) (�F) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) MW-1 16.58 20 15.02 4.98 1.56 .79 NA 6.8 11.2 0.0 586 61 Moderate chemical odor,no sheen MW-2 16.27 20 14.77 5.23 1.50 .83 NA 30 8.2 0.0 283 66 Moderate chemical odor,no sheen MW-3 16.49 20 14.98 5.02 1.51 .80 3.0 42 . 7.9 0.0 832 67 Slight weathered fuel oil/chemical odor,no sheen MW4 15.39 20 14.02 5.98 1.37 .95 NA 1.0 7.6 7.4 520 56 No odor,no sheen MW-5 16.37 20 14.95 5.05 1.42 .80 NA 0.8 8.3 3.3 147 56 No odor,no sheen NOTES:Gauge and screen all wells. Sample MW-3 for EPH and water quality analysis. BENNETT & ORREILLY, Inc, MONITOR WELL SAMPLING LOG 1573 Main Street,P.O. Box 1667 Engineering and Environmental Services Brewster,MA 02631 (508)896-6630 CLIENT Birminl?ham Residence DATE(S) 1/10/02 LOCATION 333 Eel River Rd., Osterville JOB # B099-2533 SAMPLER Kara M. Risk- ES. Genj?his M. Burdulis - ET MEASURING POINT: Groundsurface or T.O.C. T.O.C. Elev. of Total Standing Water Depth Depth to Water Table Static Volume VOC Dissolved Well reference Conductivity Temperature Number point of Water Height Elevation Volume Purged PI-101 pH Oxygen (PS/cm) (°F) Comments: (feet) Well (Feet) (feet) (feet) (gallons) (gallons) (ppm) (mg/L) (feet) MW4 16.58 20 14.95 5.05 1.63 0.81 2.5 0.4 3.9 2.9 239 54 Slight Petro/H20 odor,trace sheen MW-2 16.27 20 '14.69 5.31 1.58 0.86 3.0 30.0 4.4 4.3 109 54 Slight Petro/H20 odor,trace sheen MW-3 16.49 20 14.91 5.09 1.58 0.81 2.5 2.2 4.0 2.0 - 348 54 Slight Petro/H20 odor,light sheen MW-4 15.39 20 13.77 6.23 1.62 1.00 3.5 BDL 7.3 5.2 326 55 No odor,no sheen MW-5 16.37 20, 14.80 5.20 1.57 0.83 2.5 BDL 4.9 3.6 230 51 No odor,no sheen SVE BDL NOTES: Gauge,screen and sample all monitoring wells. ' SOLUTE TRANSPORT/TIME OF TRAVEL CALCULATIONS [Revised December 3,2001] ' Hydraulic Conductivity(K) 214.6 feet per dayl'1 Hydraulic Gradient(H) H=h,/L ' H,.=MW-2 to MW-4=0.34(avg) L =MW-2 to MW-4=83' H,=MW-2 to MW-5=0.13 (avg) L =MW-2 to MW-5=76' ' H: MW-4=0.34/83 =0.004 H: MW-5=0.13/76=0.0017 H=0.0029(avg) ' Groundwater Velocity(V) V=(K)(H)/porosity V=(214.6 ft/day)(0.0029) ' 0.25* V=2.49 ft/day ' Travel Time Release area to MW-3= 18ft 18ft-2.49 ft/day=7 days Release area to MW-4=80ft 80ft_2.49 ft/day=32 days Release area to MW-5=85ft 85ft_2.49 ft/day=34 days ' Dissolved Phase Transport Time from Release Area with Retardation(R)=24%** ' Release area to MW-3=7 days 7 days x 1.24(R) =9 days Release area to MW-4=32 days 32 days x 1.24(R) =40 days' Release area to MW-5=34 days 34 days x 1.24(R) =42 days ' Soil removal w/ORC application=February 10,2000 Time of Travel to MW-3 =February 19,2000 Time of Travel to MW-4=March 21,2000 Time of Travel to MW-5 =March 23,2000 ' H2O2 Application completed=October 31,2001 Time of Travel to MW-3=November 9,2001 ' Time of Travel to MW4=December 10,2001 Time of Travel to MW-5=December 12,2001 Calculated by : Kara Risk,Environmental Scientist 1I ' Checked by: David C. Bennett,Hydrogeologist I-Averaged Hydraulic Conductivity(K)calculated based on Bouwer-Rice(Unconfined Aquifer Slug Test)analytical methods(AQTESOL V(D1988-1994 Geraghty&Miller, Inc.) Porosity value obtained from Heath-Basic Ground-water Hydrology-U.S.Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2220,1991 "Retardation factor obtained from US EPA Modeling Subsurface Transport of Peiroleum Hydrocarbons 1 i 1 � APPENDIX C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i Fractional Aromatic Tracking Chart CI to C22 ' 700 ' 600 — Chemical Oxidant 500 Application --- 400 300 200 ' 100 — 0 Oct-99 Jan-00 April-00 July-00 Oct-00 Jan-01 April-01 Nov-01 ' Date . 0 MW-1 -o- MW-2 -A MW-3 tGroundwater Quality Parameters at MW-3 Remedial Additive Assessment S0 a, a pH '`-'- 40G- LY Iron a� 30 Chloride E — —�— f° Sulfate co . a 20 - ' — DO f ' 10 — Peroxide o ' TOC 0- 17-Oct-01 22-Oct-01 13-Nov-01 10-Jan-02 Date Lessard Euk-anmental, Inc. www.Lessard-Environmental.com BRANCH OFFICE TEL 401-353-7066 1920 Mineral Springs Avenue, Suite 9110 FAX 401-353-7067 North Providence, Rhode Island 02904 - ' March 14, 2002 Mr. David Bennett ' Bennett&O'Reilly,Inc. I 1573 Main Street ' P.O. Box 1667 Brewster,MA 02361 Via First Class Mail and Facsimile:508-896-4687 ' Subject: Chemical Oxidation Application Summary Birmingham Estate 333 Eel River Road, Osterville, MA RTN 4-15283 ' Dear Mr. Bennett: Lessard Environmental, Inc. (LEI) is pleased to present the following summary ' of the chemical oxidation applications performed at the Birmingham Estate located at 333 Eel River Road in the Town of Osterville, MA. LEI has completed two chemical oxidation injection events. The injection(s) of the chemical catalyst (ferrous sulfate) and chemical oxidant (hydrogen peroxide) occurred on October 17 and October 31, 2001. A summary of the work performed at the Site is provided below. ' 10 7 01 LEI personnel were present at the Site to perform the initial chemical oxidation injection. LEI's representatives met with a representative of B&O and performed ' a walk through of the Site. B&O personnel assisted in locating and identifying injection point and remedial additive monitoring locations. Representatives of ' Enviro-Safe Corporation were present at the Site to assist with the chemox injection. Enviro-Safe delivered approximately 600-gallons of 35% hydrogen peroxide to the Site in (12) 55-gallon drums. Subsequent to a Health and Safety meeting outlining the day's planned activities, Enviro-Safe demarcated the chemox exclusion zone with yellow caution tape. The property owner and construction workers at the Site were advised of planned activities and the planned work schedule. Pre-injection baseline monitoring was performed at CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS- Danvers, Massachusetts 01923 Professional Environmental Services and Consultation Birmingham Estate March 14,2002 ' Chemical Oxidation Summary wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5. Pre-injection results are presented as follow. s Table 1 Pre-Chemical Oxidation Monitoring October 17,2001 k � x s� Well# TempyDOr pIIH2O2IxonSulfate m � t �� m gym? ti► MW-1 13.7 0.11 8.89 0 3 <200 MW-2 14.0 2.58 7.28 0 0 <200 ' MW-3 16.1 0.28 6.90 "`0 3 <200 MW-4 13.1 2.50 5.24 0 0 <200 ' MW-5 13.0 1.73 5.63 0 0 <200 N/A-not analyzed ' Approximately 5 pounds of catalyst, dissolved in water, was evenly distributed to each of the four injection points. LEI commenced the chemical oxidation injection at approximately 10:00 AM. Approximately 400-gallons of hydrogen 1 peroxide was injected to the SVE well at the Site and approximately 65 to 7,0- gallons each was injected to wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3. The injection of hydrogen peroxide was completed at approximately 12:15 PM. LEI monitored temperature and total organic vapors (TOV) at the injection points and ambient air within and downgradient of the exclusion zone continuously during the ' injection process. No detectable concentrations of TOVs were measured in ambient air within or downgradient of the exclusion zone. Monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5 located downgradient of the injection area were monitored in ' the field for pH, dissolved oxygen, Iron, sulfate, and hydrogen peroxide during the injection process. LEI personnel remained at the Site to perform monitoring until Site conditions were stabilized. Additionally, LEI performed air monitoring in the basement of the residence prior to departing the Site. No detectable concentrations of TOVs were measured in the basement of the residence. ' Monitoring data collected during the injection process are presented as follows. a ' Page 2 Birmingham Estate March 14,2002 Chemical Oxidation Summary Table 2 Chemical Oxidation Groundwater Monitoring Data October 17,2001 ' 8�r , �" *5 ?.� uw:�`✓ is t � s �'"& Tlme .%k c k znx-s�a. `",t^ , a« '^'; " ' +wrt i^�„t^., Well# Anal ysis a , *'. . aPre60a ; .120 1$®; . 240 �4� 300 . a .. . Temp 13.1 13.6 13.0 13.2 13.1 13.0 DO 2.50 1.86 1.82 2.58 2.67 2.21 MW-4 H2O2 0 0 <5 <5 <5 0 H 5.24 5.16 5.30 5.42 5.35 ' 5.32 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sulfate <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 ' Temp 13.0 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.9 12.9 DO 1.73. 2.43 1.70 2.09 1.41 1.45 MW-5 H2O2 0 0 0 <5 <5 0 H 5.63 5.66 5.65 5.80 5.65 5.64 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sulfate <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 <200 ' Table 3 Injection Point Monitoring Data October 17,2001 'WeliNtt: Analpsi$.8a tiq -fir . +� rcrm*� 74'F" d� $ ,.�`�x,q kr.• � ) ?" Na-�y'`k$3.�r'°y� Xt,# '1A5fw ^"f.^",��'`- " + Wt�i"•d'y7'� r ,�' � �t w3.t iw a r'•:'�'"� wit' '♦ > 4d.k { x*- v �'•'.�,• a.F .� "� ' ,['. 150180210 240 300 MW-1 Temp. (C) 15.6 16.9 21.6 22.9 24.8 27.9 26.4 26.9 25.0 24.1 OV(pPmv) 0.9 0.5 0.0 8.6 10.8 9.5 8.0 8.5 0.9 1.0 ' MW-2 Temp- (C) 15.9 17.5 22.0 23.6 19.5 29.5 23.2 20.9 19.0 19.5 TOV my 1.3 4.6 0.0 10.9 12.1 15.5 9.6 12.7 5.1 2.9 MW-3 Temp. C 16.1 22.8 35.0 34.4 24.4 28.9 32.1 51.0 30.2 26.0 TOV(ppmv)l 0.0 1 4.1 1 0.0 1 121 280 99.0 40.0 18.5 22.3 2.1 ' SVE Temp. C 18.2 1 17.9 7.9 1 . 22.9 29.4 33.5 1 28.5 30.1 22.0 22.0 TOV(ppmv)l 0.0 1 6.4 1 16.8 1 29.5 1 41.0 48.5 1 20.0 21.0 1 0.9 0.5 ' NT-not tested • 1 F ' Page 3 Birmingham Estate March 14,2002 ' Chemical Oxidation Summary 101311011 ' LEI personnel were present at the Site to perform the second chemical oxidation injection. LEI's representatives met with a representative of B&O and performed a walk through of the Site. Representatives of Enviro-Safe Corporation were present at the Site to assist with the chemox injection. Enviro-Safe delivered approximately 600-gallons of 35% hydrogen peroxide to the Site in (12) 55-gallon drums. Subsequent to a Health and Safety meeting outlining the day's planned ' activities, Enviro-Safe demarcated the chemox exclusion zone with yellow caution tape and advised the property owner and construction workers at the ' Site of the planned work schedule. Pre-injection baseline monitoring was performed at wells MW-4 and MW-5. A total of approximately 0.5 pounds of catalyst, dissolved in water, was applied to each of the four injection points at the ' Site. Results of the pre-monitoring data are presented as follows. ' Table 4 Pre-Chemical Oxidation Monitoring October 31, 2001 Well# Tempe pHx H2O2 Iron" Sulfate MW4 13.1 2.64 6.8 2 0 200-400 MW-5 12.9 1.72 6.7 2 0 200-400 ' LEI commenced the chemical oxidation injection at approximately 10:15 AM. Approximately 150-gallons of hydrogen peroxide was applied to MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and the SVE. The injection of hydrogen peroxide was completed at ' approximately 12:45 PM. LEI monitored temperature and total organic vapors (TOV) at the injection points and ambient air within and downgradient of the ' exclusion zone continuously during the injection process. No detectable concentrations of TOVs were measured in ambient air within or downgradient of the exclusion zone. Monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5 located downgradient of ' the injection area were monitored in the field for pH, dissolved oxygen, Iron, sulfate, and hydrogen peroxide during the injection process. LEI personnel remained at the Site to perform monitoring until Site conditions were stabilized. ' Additionally, LEI performed air monitoring in the basement of the residence prior to departing the Site. No detectable concentrations of TOVs were ' measured in the basement of the residence. Monitoring data collected during the injection process is included as follows. ' Page 4 Birmingham Estate March 14,2002 ' Chemical Oxidation Summary Table 5 Chemical Oxidation Groundwater Monitoring Data October 31,2001 'w1.y, ` ,,-__ � A` c ' ' � a a� � ,# �='i '�w"�"vI'"��Ilne ..`�»a •s�F-sF?+,.�++� .. �� s *�"" i 'WeII# Analysis ,18Q� ?24Q Temp 13.1 131 12.9 12.9 12.8 12.8 DO 2.64 3.41 2.45 1.54 1.55 1.51 ' MW-4 H2O2 2 2 2 2 2 2 H 6.8 6.0 4.7 5.2 5.4 1 6.2 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 J0 ' Sulfate 200-400 200-400 20-400 200-400 200-400 200 Temp 12.9 12.8 12.8 12.6 13.2 13.6 ' DO 1.72 1.34 1.35 1.27 1.53 1.93 MW-5 H2O2 0.5-2 0.5-2 2 2 0.5 2 pH 6.7 6.7 5.2 5.2 4.7 5.7 ' Iron 0 .0 0 0 0 0 Sulfate 200-400 200-400 20-400 200-400 200 200 Table 6 ' Injection Point Monitoring Data October 31,2001 r "k ". r 4p'N2` r a 4x?< r 1`J s Time{ l 111 c a t ¢ u xr Well#fAnalysis _ ,$ � k w 0 re '-30a 60 k 90 120 s150 � 180 2T0 240 " 270 300 MW-1 Temp. (C) 15.4 15.1 16.3 28.3 19.0 53.2 54.5 86.8 90.7 17.4 26.9 TOV(ppmv) 3.7 11.1 2.6 5.8 9.0 16.4 34.3 27.8 20.7 0.0 8.5 MW-2 Tem C 15.6 15.6 16.6 14.4 25.9 64.9 94.2 92.8 88.9 23.0 26.0 TOV my 4.8 17.5 21.2 6.9 14.3 11.9 51.5 108 71.6 62.1 62.7 ' MW-3 Temp. (C) 18.8 18.1 23.4 83.2 40.2 46.9 92.3 88.9 86.7 18.6 26.1 TOV my 0.0 5.8 12.2 20.0 1.5 12.2 12.2 18.6 12.2 6.9 5.8 SVE 1 Temp. C 12.5 13.0 17.7 .18.1 17.7 18.3 21.6 19.2 18.5 17.7 --- TOV( mv) 0.0 0.0 3.7 11.1 11.3 15.3 15.3 9.0- 11.1 11.1 --- Page 5 Birmingham Estate March 14,2002 ' Chemical Oxidation Summary Summary and Recommendations A review of the field monitoring data generated during the two chemical ' oxidation events resulted in no significant abnormalities. Temperature and TOV readings observed during the first injection event were consistent with the observed distribution of contaminants prior to the initiation of the chemical ' oxidation process. Increased TOV concentrations and increase in temperature, due to the exothermic reaction of the Fenton s Reagent with contaminants in soil ' and groundwater, was most significant at well MW-3 where the highest levels of residual contamination have historically been observed. Field measurement of TOV and temperature were, however, within a range which indicates favorable reaction conditions. Temperature and TOV readings observed during the second injection event was higher than anticipated and desired, particularly at the groundwater monitoring wells utilized in the injection. These readings were higher than anticipated given the readings obtained during the first injection and the low soil and groundwater concentrations detected prior to the initiation of this process. When using higher concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (35% or greater), the ' exothermic breakdown of the peroxide generates heat and oxygen gas that tends to volatize contaminants from the soil and/or groundwater rather than oxidizing them. This can result in elevated temperature and TOV readings and the rapid ' decomposition of the hydrogen peroxide, resulting in the stripping of the contaminants rather than oxidation. This breakdown also reduces the overall radius of influence of this process, since its infiltration within the subsurface is ' minimized. While this mechanism may account for the readings observed in the second injection, the cause of the discrepancy between the two injection events is ' not known. Due to the location and orientation of monitoring points utilized in the chemical ' oxidation applications relative to the injection points, the determination of the radius of influence of the process is difficult to ascertain. Monitoring wells MW- 4 and MW-5, the two wells utilized as remedial additive monitoring points, are ' situated downgradient of the injection area, at a distance which is beyond the anticipated radius of influence of the process. Both field'analyses performed by LEI during the injection process and laboratory analyses performed by B&O ' subsequent to the injection events indicate that the process had no appreciable impact on groundwater at MW-4 and MW-5. In the absence of quantitative evidence to evaluate the radius of influence, LEI must rely on past experience at similar locations to estimate the radius of influence. Based on past experience, LEI believes that an estimated radius of influence of ten feet would represent a. ' conservative estimate of the potential treatment radius at this Site. Utilizing this ' Page 6 i Birmingham Estate March 14,2002 ' Chemical Oxidation Summary conservative estimate, the treatment areas of the injection points would overlap significantly and include the source area of the release. B&O personnel collected one round of groundwater samples subsequent to the ' first injection event and three rounds of groundwater samples subsequent to the second injection event to aid in determining the effectiveness of this process. Results of the groundwater analyses exhibited continued non-detectable contaminant concentrations at all monitoring wells with the exception of well ' MW-3. Well MW-3 continues to exhibit concentrations of C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons which slightly exceed the MA DEP Method 1 GW-1 Standard. While the results of post-remedial analyses conducted at MW-3 have fluctuated ' slightly, the chemical oxidation injections have resulted in a clear decrease in contaminant concentrations at MW-3 of approximately 40% compared to concentrations observed prior to initiation of the process. The 40% destruction ' efficiency observed at the Site is very favorable. Although,higher destruction efficiencies are possible utilizing the chemical oxidation process, the process is ' more efficient in high concentration (highly contaminated) systems and less efficient in low concentration systems such as the Site. The likely cause for the slight fluctuations of groundwater concentrations at well MW-3 subsequent to the completion of the chemical oxidation events, is the result of a rebound effect sometimes associated with this process. It is LEI's past ' experience at similar sites to observe a slight increase in the groundwater concentrations during the chemical oxidation process, particularly following periods of elevated temperature readings. This is usually followed by a permanent decrease as the contaminant mass is degraded. This increase is likely the result of the migration of OHM from the soil into solution during this exothermic process. In environmentally sensitive areas, the MA DEP typically recommends a ' monitoring period of at least six months subsequent to the completion of the chemical oxidation process to evaluate long-term trends in contaminant concentration. The sensitive nature of receptors at the Site likely necessitates extending the minimum MA DEP monitoring period. If continued monitoring alone does not indicate sufficient reduction in groundwater contaminant concentrations, the timeframe for achieving closure at the Site could be extended ' significantly. LEI recommends that additional chemical oxidation events be completed at the site to further reduce remaining groundwater contamination to achieve the appropriate cleanup goals. Based on the results obtained in the first two chemical oxidation injections, it appears that existing injection points would be sufficient for treatment of remaining groundwater contamination. It is ' important to maintain control over the injection events to prevent the rapid ' Page 7 Birmingham Estate March 14,2002 1 Chemical Oxidation Summary decomposition of the hydrogen peroxide and to maximize the radius of 1 influence. Since field measurements performed during the second injection event were not consistent with optimum reaction conditions, LEI recommends that the hydrogen peroxide concentration utilized in subsequent injection events 1 be decreased slightly. As a measure of control, LEI will be prepared to lower the hydrogen peroxide concentration utilizing a dilution manifold that we have recently designed. Utilizing the dilution manifold, LEI will be able to modify the 1 concentration of hydrogen peroxide to any concentration up to 35% based on field observations. Based on the results of the first two chemical oxidation injections and our past experience at similar sites, we recommend a second series 1 of two chemical oxidation events to be performed at the site. ' We hope that this information is suitable to allow you to complete your evaluation of the chemical oxidation process and for the completion of the i upcoming status report. If you have any questions, please feel free to call our 1 offices. Sincerely, r 1 Lessard Environmental, Inc. 1 Christopher D. Glod Lawrence H. Lessard, M.S., LSP 1 Senior Project Manager President 1 Attachments 1 1 ' Page 8 ' Table 1A: Pre-In'ection Groundwater Monitoring,10/17/0 Dissolved Hydrogen Iron Sulfate t Well pH Oxygen Peroxide (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg�-) MW-1 8.89 0.11 BDL 3 <200 MW-2 7.28 2.58 BDL BDL <200 ' MW-3 6.90 0.28 BDL 3 <200 MW-4 5.24 2.5 BDL BDL <200 MW-5 5.63 1.73 BDL BDL <200 Table 1B: Chemical Oxidation Groundwater Monitorin , 10/17/01 Dissolved Hydrogen Iron Sulfate ' Well Time pH Oxygen Peroxide (mgA-) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) MW-4 30 5.16 1.86 BDL BDL <200 ' MW-5 5.66 2.43 BDL BDL <200 MW-4 60 5.30 1.82 BDL BDL <200 MW-5 5.65 1.70 BDL BDL <200 ' MW-4 120 5.42 2.58 BDL BDL <200 MW-5 5.80 2.09 BDL BDL <200 MW-4 180 5.35 2.67 BDL BDL <200 MW-5 5.62 1.41 BDL BDL <200 ' MW-4 240 5.32 2.21 BDL BDL <200 MW-5 5.64 1.45 BDL BDL <200 Table 1C: Chemical Oxidation Groundwater Monitorin , 10/31/01 Dissolved Hydrogen' Iron Sulfate Well Time pH Oxygen Peroxide (mg/1-) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) MW-4 Pre 6.8 2.64 2 BDL 200-400 ' MW-5 6.7 1.72 0.5-2 BDL ' 200-400 MW-4 30 6.0 3.41 2 BDL 200-400 MW-5 6.7 1.34 0.5-2 BDL 200400 MW-4 60 5.7 2.45 2 BDL 200400 ' MW-5 5.2 1.35 0.5-2 BDL 200-400 MW-4 120 5.2 1.54 2 BDL 200-400 MW-5 5.2 1.27 0.5-2 BDL 200-400 ' MW-4 180 5.4 1.55 2 BDL 200-400 MW-5 4.9 1.53 0.5-2 BDL 200 MW-4 240 6.2 1.51 2 BDL 200 ' MW-5 5.7 1.93 0.5-2 BDL 200 1 ' Table 2A: Injection Point Monitoring,10/17/01 Well Time Temperature(°C) TOV(ppm) ' MW-1 15.6 0.9 MW-2 Pre-Injection 15.9 1.3 MW-3 16.1 0.0 ' SVE 18.2 0.0 MW-1 16.9 0.5 MW-2 30 17.5 4.6 ' MW-3 22.8 4.1 SVE 17.9 6.4 MW-1 21.6 0.0 ' MW-2 60 22.0 5.0 MW-3 35.0 5.6 SVE 18.2 16.8 MW-1 22.9 8.6 ' MW-2 90 23.6 10.9 MW-3 34.4 121 SVE 22.9 29.5 ' MW-1 24.8 10.8 MW-2 120 19.5 12.1 MW-3 24.4 280 ' SVE 29.4 41.0 MW-1 27.9 9.5 MW-2 150 29.5 15.5 ' MW-3 28.9 99.0 SVE 33.5 48.5 MW-1 26.4 8.0 MW-2 180 23.2 9.6 ' MW-3 32.1 40.0 SVE 28.5 20.0 MW-1 26.9 8.5 ' MW-2 210 20.9 12.7 MW-3 51.0 18.5 SVE 30.1 21.0 ' MW-1 25.0 0.9 MW-2 240 19.0 5.1 MW-3 30.2 22.3 SVE 22.0 0.9 ' MW-1 24.1 1.0 MW-2 300 19.5 2.9 MW-3 26.0 2.1 ' SVE 22.0 0.5 1 f Table 213: Injection Point Monitoring,10/31/01 Well Time Temperature(°C) TOV(ppm) ' MW-1 15.4 3.7 MW-2 Pre-Injection 15.6 4.8 MW-3 18.8 0.0 ' SVE 12.5 0.0 MW-1 15.1 11.1 MW-2 30 15.6 17.5 MW-3 18.1 5.8 ' SVE 13.0 0.0 MW-1 16.3 2.6 MW-2 60 16.6 21.2 ' MW-3 23.4 12.2 SVE 17.7 3.7 MW-1 28.3 5.8 ' MW-2 90 14.4 6.9 MW-3 83.2 20.0 SVE 18.1 11.1 ' MW-1 19.0 7.0 MW-2 120 25.9 14.3 MW-3 40.2 1.5 SVE 17.7 11.3 MW-1 53.2 16.4 MW-2 150 64.9 11.9 MW-3 46.9 12.2 SVE 18.3 15.3 MW-1 54.5 34.3 MW-2 180 94.2 51.5 MW-3 92.3 12.2 ' SVE 21.6 15.3 MW-1 86.8 27.8 MW-2 210 92.8 108 ' MW-3 88.9 18.6 SVE 19.2 9.0 MW-1 90.7 20.7 ' MW-2 240 88.9 71.6 M W-3 86.7 12.2 SVE 18.5 .11.1 MW-1 17.4 0.0 MW-2 270 23.0 62.1 MW-3 18.6 6.9 SVE 17.7 11.1 ' MW-1 26.9 0.5 MW-2 300 26.0 62.7 MW-3 26.1 5.8 SVE --- --- RISK MANAGEMENT - � 7 kill INCORPORATED 1 -7`h February 2002 Health & Envlronmental bl"'Sulting - ' Proposal No. 2002-104 Ms. Kara Risk ' Bennett & O'Reilley, Inc. 1573 Main Street P.O. Box 1667 ' Brewster, MA 02631 Subject: MCP` Method 3 Risk Characterization Proposal ' Birmingham Residence 333 Eel River Road Osterville, MA ' RTN 4-15283 Dear Ms. Risk: ' Following our discussions, Risk Management Incorporated (RMI) is pleased to offer this proposal to provide professional consulting services to Bennett & O'Reilley, Inc. (B&O) and your clients, John and Karen Birmingham, to conduct an MCP Method 3 Risk Characterization consistent with the requirements of 310 CMR 40.0900, and .to identify a Response Action Outcome (RAO) that will achieve a condition of"No Significant Risk of Harm," pursuant to the requirements of 310 CM 40.1000. BACKGROUND & UNDERSTANDING RMI understands that the Site is part of the residential property located at 333 Eel River Road, Osterville, MA and resulted from an historical, OHM'' subsurface release of No. 2 Fuel Oil from an abandoned 1,000-gallon Underground Storage Tank (UST) (see Site Plan. RAO-2. Area of Class C RAO Statement. B&O 01-03-02). Following removal of the UST and the excavation ' and off-site disposal of petroleum-contaminated soils from a 20 ft. (L) x 15 ft. (W) x 6-15 ft. (D) area, Oxygen Release Compound (ORC) was mixed with soils at the bottom of the former tank grave to enhance remediation of residual contamination in soil and groundwater. Depth to groundwater across the Site was estimated at approximately 15 ft. below grade (0&B 2001)3. Prior to backfilling the excavation, a Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) system was installed at the bottom to serve as both a sub-slab venting system for residual Volatile Organic Compounds ' (VOCs) and to promote oxygen exchange and facilitate natural attenuation and dilution in the saturated zone. The SVE was also retrofitted to allow supplemental application of remedial additives or for flushing of the area with groundwater to address petroleum residuals in the capillary fringe and groundwater(O&B 2001). MCP—Massachusetts Contingency Plan 2 OHM—Oil & Hazardous Material 3 Letter: "Class C—Response Action Outcome Statement. Remedy Implementation Plan: Phase 1 through Phase IV CRA. RTN 4-15283. Birmingham Cape Residence,333 Eel River Road,Osterville, MA"to ' MADEP,SERO, BWSC/ERS, Lakeville, MA from B&O,Brewster, MA dated 8 January 2001. 27 Stoneymeade Way • Acton,MA 01720-5676 Tel. 978-266-2878 Fax 978-263-0637 • e-mail: pww@riskmi.com www.riskmi.com Birmingham Residence • ' 7`h February 2002 ' Page 2 of 5 ' There are no known private wells within 500 ft. of the Site. In addition, the Site is not part of an MCP-designated Zone 11 or within 200 ft. of a Zone A(310 CMR 40.0006). However, the Site is ' part of the USEPA4 Sole Source Aquifer for Cape Cod; thus, the MCP GW-1 Groundwater Category is considered applicable to the Site. However, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0932(5)(b)(2), the Potential Drinking Water Source Area designation could be challenged, since the Site is part ' of a property that borders Eel River, a marine estuary to West Bay, and thus subject to saltwater intrusion. This could potentially result in brackish groundwater conditions at the Site that would prevent development of a private potable water supply. ' Based on the direction of groundwater flow across the Site from the northwest to the southwest, the Eel River is considered the primary environmental receptor; thus, the MCP default GW-3 Groundwater Category is also considered applicable. ' Current groundwater quality indicates the presence:of two VOCs, the EPH C11-C�,) aromatic fraction and 2-Methyl naphthalene, which were detected in Monitoring-Well MW-3 (see Table 1 ' attached). Since the latter monitoring.well is located upgradient of and within 30 ft. of the residence (see Site Plan. RAO-2. .Area of Class C RAO Statement. B&O 01-03-02), and depth to groundwater is approximately 15 ft., the MCP GW-2 Groundwater Category is also considered ' to apply under future foreseeable Site conditions; the house.is not.currently occupied. Comparison of current OHM groundwater concentrations in Monitoring Wells MW-1 through ' MW-5 to current, applicable MCP Method 1 Groundwater Standards indicates a condition of "Significant Risk" of harm to human health, public welfare and the environment. Groundwater concentrations of the EPH Ci I-C,,aromatic fraction.and;2-Methyl naphthalene detected in MW-3 exceed their respective GW-1 Standards (i.e.,,.280 ug/L vs. 200 ug/L and 27 ug/L vs. 10 ug/L, respectively. See Table 1 — shaded values). OHM groundwater concentrations in the other monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-2, MW-4 and MW-5) are Non-Detect (see Tablel). ' In contrast, comparison of residual OHM levels.detected in composite soil samples taken from the walls (6-15 ft. bgs) and bottom of the former UST grave to current, applicable MCP Method ' 1 Soil Standards indicates a condition of "No Significant Risk (see Table 2). None of the residual OHM levels detected exceed their S-1, S-2 or S-3 Standards for the GW-1, GW-2 or GW-3 Groundwater Categories (see Table 2). ' Based on the above findings, RMI proposes to conduct an MCP Method 3 Risk'Characterization to address potential human and environmental exposures to the contaminants detected. ' RMI's approach is based on achieving the following objectives: ' 4 USEPA—United States Environmental Protection Agency Birmingham Residence 7`h February 2002 Page 3 of 5 ' ❑ Developing a site-specific Conceptual Exposure Model that identifies only complete exposure pathways and allows the development of defensible Exposure Point ' Concentrations (EPCs) for each medium of potential concern (e.g., soil; groundwater; air; surface water); ❑ Developing a critical, useable analytical data set that will be representative of Site conditions and that can be used to derive the EPCs consistent with the requirements of 310 CMR 40.0926; and ' ❑ Identifying any need for fate and transport modeling to develop EPCs for indoor and outdoor air, and surface water for the risk characterization and for comparison to applicable human health and/or environmental standards, criteria or benchmark values ' that are protective of human health, public welfare, safety and the environment. To achieve the aforementioned objectives, RMI proposes to conduct the following Work Items. WORK ITEMS ' 1. RMI will work with B&O to identify any information (e.g., MADEp5 GIS Site.Scoring Map) and/or analytical sampling data gaps (e.g., soil gas). Report findings to B&O, and, if indicated, recommend a strategy'to address the data.gaps. ' 2. Review the analytical sampling data collected. Validate and tabulate the data for an MCP Method 3 Risk Characterization. Finalize a site-specific Conceptual Exposure Model for ' evaluation of risk in Work Item 4. 3. Identify Compounds of Potential Concern (COPC) from the analytical data sets reviewed in ' Work Item 2. Calculate EPCs using deterministic or probabilistic analysis for the COPCs identified, pursuant to the requirements of 310 CMR 40.0926. If indicated, model EPCs to evaluate potential indoor/outdoor air, and surface water COPC exposures. Identify appropriate and applicable health and environmental standards, criteria and guidelines for ' comparison to the COPCs' EPCs. 4. Evaluate the level of risk of harm to human health, public welfare, and the environment from ' potential exposures to Site COPCs, using site-specific exposure scenarios based on current and foreseeable site uses and activities, and potential human and environmental receptors for which only complete exposure pathways are likely to exist. Conduct a Method 3 MCP Risk Characterization consistent with the requirements of 310 CMR 40.0990 through 40.0995. At this time, only a Stage I Environmental Screening (as defined in 310 CMR 40.0995(3)) is ' currently anticipated. However, should a Stage II Environmental Risk Characterization be ' 5 MADEP—Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection f Birmingham Residence 71h February 2002 ' Page 4 of 5 ' indicated, a separate cost proposal will be required. Risk of harm to safety will be characterized in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0941(2). ' 5. Use the risk of harm findings to identify if any remedial measures are still required to achieve a Permanent Solution and to recommend an appropriate RAO Class. ' 6. Prepare and submit one draft and one final report of the Risk Characterization findings in a format consistent with "Suggested Outline and Content" presented in MADEP's Guidance for Disposal Site Risk Characterization,July 1995. 7. Meet with B&O and your client, or MADEP, as needed. ' TERMS & CONDITIONS ' RMI proposes to provide the consulting services for Work Items 1 through 6 on a Time & Materials Basis at labor rates of$50 to'$125/hour, materials at cost, and travel at 0.35¢/mile for a total cost not-to-exceed $5,000. ' RMI proposes to provide the consulting services for Work Item 7 on a Time & Materials Basis at a labor rate of$125/hour, materials at cost, and travel at 0 35¢/mile. As noted in Work Item 4, only a Stage I Environmental Screening is currently anticipated for this release site. A separate proposal and cost estimate will be required for any Stage II Environmental Risk Characterization. ' RMI proposes to work closely with B&O to monitor and control project costs. However, RMI reserves the right to re-negotiate the cost estimate for Work Items 1 through 5 in the event that any"out-of-scope" services are required. These services could include,but are not limited to: ' ❑ evaluation of additional analytical data other than those identified in this site-specific y proposal (Work Item 2); ❑ risk calculations must be reP eated with new analytical data other those identified in the original proposal (Work Item 2); ❑ additional exposure scenarios are evaluated, other than those identified in the site- specific proposal (Work Items 2 and 4); and ❑ cumulative receptor risk findings indicate additional evaluation, calculations and a revised strategy to obtain a Permanent Solution (Work Item 4). ' Should any of the above or other"out-of-scope" issues arise, RMI will immediately notify you to , discuss the situation, and, where warranted, request written approval to proceed and incur ' additional costs as authorized. Birmingham Residence 71h February 2002 ' Page 5 of 5 TWIT ' If the above arrangements are satisfactory to you, please indicate your approval by signing both copies of this letter and Attachment A(Technical Services Agreement) and returning one copy of ' each to my attention in Acton, along with a retainer of $2,500" payable to "Risk Management Incorporated" so that we can obtain the "Certificate of Insurance" for B&O and begin work. This offer is valid for 60 days. fThank you for inviting us to submit this proposal. We look forward to working with you on this important project. ' Sincerely yours, This proposal and Attachment A Risk ManagemenUn.corporated are understood and accepted: J: By: ' Peter W. Woodman, Ph.D. (Signature) President By: (Print or Type Name). ' Title Date: Enclosures: Two original, signed proposal letters each with: ' Attachment B. Technical Services Agreement Tables 1 and 2 6 Please note the retainer will be applied as a credit against the cost of services to be rendered. i t Table 1 Summary of Most Recent Groundwater Analytical Data&Comparison to MCP Method 1 Groundwater Standards Birmingham Residence 333 Eel River Road Osterville,MA RTN:4-15283 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION:MONITORING WELL LOCATION/ Chemical SCREENING DEPTH/DATE OF SAMPLING Current/Proposed Applicable MCP Method 1 MCP Upper OHM(ug/L) Abstracts MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 Detection Conc.Maximum Groundwater Standards(ug/L) Concentration Service Frequency Limits in Number (ug/L) GW-1 GW-2 GW-3 Groundwater(ug/L) 1/10/02 1/10/02 1/10/02 1/10/02 1/10/02 EPHs/PAHs C9-C,9Aliphatics 250 250 250 250 250 0/5 4,000/4,000 1,000/5.000 20.000/20,000 100,000/100,000 C19-C36 Aliphatics 250 250 250 250 250 0/5 5,000/5,000 --- 20,000/20,000 100,000/100,000 C11-C22 Aromatics 80 80 280 80 80 1/5 280 200/200 .; 50,000/50,000 30,000/30,000 100,000/100,000 Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.25 0.25 1.4 0.25 0.25 1/5 1.4 20/80 NA 5.000/200 50,000/2,000 Fluorene 86-73-7 0.25 0.25 .1.6 0.25 0.25 1/5 1.6 300/90 NA 3,000/60 30.000/900 2-Methyinaphthalene 91-57-6 0.25 0.25 27 0.25 0.25 1/5 27 10/10 10,000/6,000 3,000/1,000 100,000/60,000 Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0/5 - 20/140 6,000/20,000 6.000/1,000 60,000/1000,000 Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.25 0.25 0.9 0.25 0.25 1/5 0.9 300/100 NA 50/60 3,000/1,000 VOCs Benzene 71-43-2 0_5 0_5 05 0_5 0_5 0/5 5/5 2,000/40,000 7,000/5,000 70,000/100,000 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0_5 0_5 0_5 0_5 0_5 0/5 700/700 30,000/20,000 4,000/90 100,000/100,000 Toluene 108-88-3 0_5 0_5 0_5 0_5 0_5 0/5 1.000/1,000 6,000/50,000 50,000/50,000 100,000/100,000 Total Xyienes 1330-20-7 0_5 0_5 0_5 0_5 0_5 0/5 10,000/10,000 6,000/50,000 50,000/7,000 100.000/100.000 Notes&Abbreviations: 1. OHM= Oil&Hazardous Material;ug/L=micrograms per liter;-=Not Analyzed. 2.'EPHs/PAHs=Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons/Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons;VOCs=Volatile Organic Compounds. 3. Bolded values represent detected levels. Numbers in italics and underlined represent one-half of the sample Detection Limits. 4. NA=Not Applicable. .5. Current MCP Method One Groundwater Standards 310 CMR 40.0974(2)Table 1 dated 10/29/99/Proposed MADEP May 2001. 6 Upper Concentration Limit values from 310 CMR 40.0996(7)(as of 10/29/99) m. ?, Sh1049 QHM a00 !t( ion s.exg®ed,&haded MCP Method 1 Groundwater Standards Birmingham Residence-Table 1 1 APPENDIX D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-108 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT 4❑ _ 15283 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800 (Subpart H) A. SITE LOCATION: Site Name:(optional) Bi rmi ngham ReG i denr_P Street: vu Pet River Road Location Aid: Accrc Map 1 1 S, Tot- 2 ' City/Town: Qst_ervi 114- ZIP 02655-0000 Related Release Tracking Numbers that this Form Addresses: ' Tier Classification: (check one of the following) Tier IA Tier IB Tier IC. Tier II Not Tier Classified If a Tier I Permit has been issued,state the Permit ' B. THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO: (check all that apply) Submit a Phase I Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(complete Sections A,B,C,G,H,I and J). Submit a Phase 11 Scope of Work,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0834(complete Sections A,B,,C,G,H,I and J). ' Submit a final Phase II Comprehensive Site Report and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0836 (complete Sections A,B,C.D,G,H,I and J). ' ❑ Submit a Phase III Remedial Action Plan and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0862(complete Sections A,B,C,G,H,I and J). Submit a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0874(complete Sections A,B,C,G,H,I and J). Submit an As-Built Construction Report,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0875(complete Sections A,B,C,G,H,I and J). ' ® Submit a Phase IV Final Inspection Report and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0878 and 40.0879 (complete Sections A,B.C,E.G,H,I and J). ' ® Submit a periodic Phase V Inspection&Monitoring Report,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0892(complete Sections A,B,C,G,H,I and J). Submit a final Phase V Inspection&Monitoring Report and Completion Statement,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893 (complete Sections A,B,C,F,G,H,I and J). ' You must attach all supporting documentation required for each use of form Indicated,including copies of any Legal Notices and Notices to Public Officials required by 310 CMR 40.1400. C. RESPONSE ACTIONS: ® Check here if any response action(s)that serves as the basis for the Phase submittal(s)involves the use of Innovative Technologies. (DEP is interested in using this information to create an Innovative Technologies Clearinghouse.) Describe TnGi tL Bi oremedi at i on, Hydrocren Peroxide ' D. PHASE 11 COMPLETION STATEMENT: Specify the outcome of the Phase 11 Comprehensive Site Assessment: Haaiuonai tomprenensive response Actions are necessary at mis aae,Dasea on me results or the rnase a t omprenensrve aite The requirements of a Class A Response Action Outcome have been met and a completed Response Action Outcome Statement (BWSC-104)will be submitted to DEP. The requirements of a Class B Response Action Outcome have been met and a completed Response Action Outcome Statement (BWSC-104)will be submitted to DEP. Rescoring of this Site using the Numerical Ranking System is necessary,based on the results of the final Phase II Report. E. PHASE IV COMPLETION STATEMENT: ' Specify the outcome of Phase IV activities: Phase V operation,maintenance or monitoring of the Comprehensive Response Action is necessary to achieve a Response Action ❑ Outcome. (This site will be subject to a Phase V Operation,Maintenance and Monitoring Annual Compliance Fee.) The requirements of a Class A Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional operation,maintenance or monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement(BWSC-104)will be submitted to DEP. ' The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional operation,maintenance or monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement(BWSC-104)will be submitted to DEP. SECTION E IS CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE ' Revised 3/30/95 Supersedes Forms BWSC-010(in part)and 013 Page 1 of 3 Do Not Alter This Form Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-108 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT 4❑ _ 15283 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800(Subpart H) ' E. PHASE IV COMPLETION STATEMENT: (continued) The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. Further operation,maintenance or monitoring of the remedial action is necessary to ensure that conditions are maintained and that further progress is made toward a Permanent Solution. A completed ' Response Action Outcome Statement(BWSC-104)will be submitted to DEP. Indicate whether the operation and maintenance will be Active or Passive. (Active Operation and Maintenance is defined at 310 CMR O Active Operation and Maintenance O Passive Operation and Maintenance ' (Active Operation and Maintenance makes the Site subject to a Post-RAO Class C Active Operation and Maintenance Annual Compliance Fee.) F. PHASE V COMPLETION STATEMENT: t Specify the outcome of Phase V activities: The requirements of a Class A Response Action Outcome have been met and a completed Response Action Outcome Statement (BWSC-104)will be submitted to DEP. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional operation,maintenance or monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement(BWSC-104)will be submitted to DEP. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. Further operation,maintenance or monitoring of the remedial ' action is necessary to ensure that conditions are maintained and that further progress is made toward a Permanent Solution. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement(BWSC-104)will be submitted to DEP. Indicate whether the operation and maintenance will be Active or Passive. (Active Operation and Maintenance is defined at 310 CMR O Active Operation and Maintenance O Passive Operation and Maintenance ' (Active Operation and Maintenance makes the Site subject to a Post-RAO Class C Active Operation and Maintenance Annual Compliance P P G. LSP OPINION: I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this transmittal form,including any and all documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based upon application of(i)the standard of care in 309 CMR 4.02(1),(ii)the applicable provisions of 309 CMR 4.02(2)and(3),and(iii)the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(5),to the ' best of my knowledge,information and belief, > if Section B indicates that a Phase 1,Phase it,Phase 111,Phase/V or Phase V Completion Statement is being submitted,the response action(s) that is(are)the subject of this submittal(1)has(have)been developed and implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c. 21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the ' applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21E and 310 CMR 40.0000,and(iii)complies(y)with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals identified in this submittal; > if Section B indicates that a Phase/l Scope of Work or a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(i)has(have)been developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21E and 310 CMR 40.0000,and(iii)complies(y)with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals identified in this submittal; ' > if Section B indicates that an As-Built Construction Report or a Phase V Inspection and Monitoring Report is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(i)is(are)being implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,and(iii)complies(y)with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals identified in this submittal , ' I am aware that significant penalties may result,including,but not limited to,possible fines and imprisonment,if I submit information which I know to be false,inaccurate or materially incomplete. Check here if the Response Action(s)on which this opinion is based,if any,are(were)s s),permit(s)and/or approval(s) ' issued by DEP or EPA. If the box is checked,you MUST attach a statement identifying O ' s thereof. LSP Name: navi d C_ BPnnPt-t- LSP#: 4303 Stamp: ,t DAVID C. Telephone: - Ext.: BENNETT � , No...4303 FAX:(optional) �'� 'LS,F�GISTER��a� ' C SItE P r Signature: Date: o ' Revised 3/30/95 Supersedes Forms BWSC-010(in part)and 013 Page 2 of 3 Do Not Alter This Form tMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-108 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup i ' COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL Release Tracking FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT _ 15283 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484(Subpart D)and 40.0800 (Subpart H) ' H. PERSON UNDERTAKING RESPONSE ACTION(S): Name of ' Name of .Tohn and/or Karen Si rmi nclham Title: Rnmenwners Street: 333 Rel River Road City/Town: ate ry i 11 e, State: MA ZIP Code: n 2 6 s s-n o o o ' Telephone: S O R-4 2 R-2 6 R 5 Ext.: FAX: Ei Check here if there has been a change in the person undertaking the Response ' Action. I. RELATIONSHIP TO SITE OF PERSON UNDERTAKING RESPONSE ACTION(S): (check one) ® RP or PRP Specify: ® Owner O Operator O Generator O Transporter Other RP or PRP: Fiduciary,Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status(as defined by M.G.L.c.21 E,s.2) Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way(as defined by M.G.L.c.21 E,s.50)) ' Any Other Person Undertaking Response Action Specify J. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON UNDERTAKING RESPONSE ACTION(S): I,Mahn and/or Kar n Ri rmi ngham attest under the pains and penalties of perjury(i)that I have personally examined and am ' familiar with the information contained in this submittal,including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form,(ii)that,based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information,the material information contained in this submittal is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate and complete,and(iii)that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the entity legally responsible for this submittal. I/the person or entity on whose behalf this submittal is made am/is aware that there are significant penalties, ' including,but not limited to,possible fines and imprisonment,for willfully submitting false,inaccurate,or incomplete information. By: v 1 Title: homeowners ' (signature) For 4, CR yy` I kan, Date: V Ad zt t^ (print name of person or entity recorded in Secti n ) ' Enter address of the person providing certification,if different from address recorded in Section H: Street: City/Town: State: ZIP Code: ' Telephone: Ext.: FAX:(optional) YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THIS FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMENT AS INCOMPLETE. IF ' YOU SUBMIT AN INCOMPLETE FORM,YOU MAY BE PENALIZED FOR MISSING A REQUIRED DEADLINE. • F , ' Revised 3/30/95 Supersedes Forms BWSC-010(in part)and 013 Page 3 of 3 Do Not Alter This Form 1 1 1 � APPENDIX E 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1 ' ENVIROTECH LABORATORIES, INC MA CERT. NO.:M-MA 063 44y RTE. 130 ' SANDWICH, AfA 02563 504 (9,54-6460) 1-,600-339-6460 FAX(508)96,6-6446 1 November 2, 2001 Bennett& O'Reilly, Inc. 1573 Main Street P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 Project Name: Birmingham . Project Number: B099-2533 Location: Monitoring wells Sample Date: . 10/22/2001 grab at 11:00 AM Sampled By. Kara Fish i Lab ID #: W0110114 Date Received: 10/25/01 ' Results of Analysis: Lab ID#: MW 3 ' Parameters Units Method MDL Date Analyzed pH pH units 6.79 4500 H+ NA 10/25/01 Dissolved Iron mg/L 0.2 200.7 0.1 10/26/01 ' Chloride mg/L 39.5 300.0 3.0 10/25/01 Sulfate mg/L 40.9 300.0 1.0 10/25/01 Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 10.2 4000-OC 1.0 10/25/01 ' Hydrogen Peroxide mg/L <4.0* titration 4.0*, 10/26/01 Total Organic Carbon mg/L 19.2 10129 5.0 10/31/01 ' *detection limit increased due to interfering substances present ' ND=None Detected By: "' ona d J. Saar Di e Laboratory ct r ENVIROTECN LABORATORIES, INC. ' M-A CERT NO.:.M- A 063 449 RTE. 130 SANDWICH, MA 02563 504 (6,64-6460) 1-400-339-6460 FAX(50,)4,64-6446 November 26, 2001 Bennett 8 O'Reilly, Inc. ' 1573 Main Street P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 Project Name: Birmingham Project Number: B099-2533 Location: Monitoring wells ' Sample Date: 11/13/2001 grab at 2:00 PM Sampled By: Kara Fish Lab/D #: W0111050 Date Received. 11/14/01 ' Results of Analysis: Lab/D#: MW 3 ' Parameters Units Method MDL Date Analyzed pH pH units 7.20 4500 H+ NA 11/14/01 Dissolved Iron mg/L <0.1 200.7 0.1 11/16/01 Chloride mg/L 44.5 300.0 3.0 11/14/01 ' Sulfate mg/L 40.8 300.0 1.0 11/14/01 Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 10.8- 4000-OC 1.0 11/14/01 Hydrogen Peroxide mg/L <3.2 titration 3.2* 11/20/01 Total Organic Carbon mg/L 22.9 10129 5.0 11/15/01 ' *detection limit increased due to interfering substances present ' ND=None Detected By:./ ko ald J. S a i ' Laboratory i ector FEWIROTRCHLABORATORI£S,MC. NA CRRT.NO.:AUA(A 063 449RTX 130 i ��o� ' SAXOWCB, � 02563 509(969-6460) 1 400-339-6460 FAX(50,1) -6446 January 17, 2002 ' Bennett& O'Reilly, Inc. 1573 Main Street P.O. Box 1667 ' Brewster, MA 02631 Project � t Name: Birmingham Project Number. B099-2533 ' Location: Monitoring wells ' Sample Date: 1/10/02 grab Sampled By: Kara Fish ' Lab ID#: W0201036A-C Date Received. 1/10/02 Results of Analysis: MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 tLab ID#: A B C Parameters Units Method MDL Date Analyzed PH pH units 6.90 5.64 1 5.65 4500 H+ NA 1/10/02 ' Dissolved Iron mg/L 0.4 0.3 0.2 200.7 0.1 1/11/02 Chloride mg/L 38.6 54.7 21.7 300.0 3.0 1/10/02 Sulfate mg/L 16.7 31.6 10.9 300.0 3.0 1/10/02 Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 4.85 6.87 5.76 4000-OC 1.0 1/10/02 ' Hydrogen Peroxide mg/L <2.0* ND ND titration 0.3 1/16/02 Total Organic Carbon mg/L 4.9 4.8 ND 10129 1.0 01/11/02 Sample Time 10:45 AM 11:30 AM 11:00 AM ' *Higher Detection limit due to interferences. ' ND=None Detected i t Byknaari ' Laboratory Dir c or 1 E _ 1 G Groundwater Analytical,Inc. GROUNDWATER P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL228 Main Street 1 Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 ' October 17, 2001 1 Ms. Kara Shumway Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. 1 P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 0263.1 1 Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 Lab ID: 44935 Sampled: 10-02-01 1 Dear Kara: 1 Enclosed are the Metals,.TOC, Hydrogen Peroxide, Chloride, Dissolved Oxygen, pH and Sulfate Analyses performed for the above referenced project. The TOC and Hydrogen Peroxide Analyses were subcontracted. This project was processed for Standard Two Week turnaround. 1 This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a 1 brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, and a statement of our state certifications. 1 I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report' is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. 1 Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. 1 Sincerely, 1I do Jonathan R. Sanford 1 President J RS/amb Enclosures 1 , 1 ENVIROTECH LABORATORIES, INC. MA Cert. No.: M-MA 063 449 Rte. 130 Sandwich, MA 02563 (508) 888-6460 1-800-339-6460 FAX (508)888-6446 October 12, 2001 ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc. PO Box 1200 Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 Project Name: 44935 ' Collection Date: 10/2/01 Sampled by: NA Lab/D#: W0110014A-C Results of Analysis: Sample ID Time: Lab ID: Hydrogen Peroxide (mg/L)** ' MW-3 9:15 A 2.0* MW-4 9:30 B " < 0.3 ' MW-5 9:40 C < 0.3 ' *true value may be lower due to possible interfering substances. Analyzed on 10-10-2001 By RS ' ** Method -Titration < = less than > = greater than , j nal J. Saa i Laboratory De or ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc. GROUNDWATER P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL Buz Main Street . Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 ' September 27, 2001 Ms. Kara Shumway Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. ' P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 LAID: 44363 Sampled: 02-10-00 ' Dear Kara: ' Enclosed are the SPLP Metals Analyses performed for the above referenced project. This project was processed for Standard Two Week turnaround. ' This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, ' and a statement of our state certifications. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. ' Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, I F Jonathan R. San ord President ' )RS/ss Enclosures GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) EPA Methods 1312, 6010B and 7470A Trace Metals by ICP-AES and CVAA ' Field ID: BOH:15-16' Laboratory ID: 44363-01 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Sampled: 02-10-00 Client: Bennett 8,O'Reilly, Inc Received: 09-13-01 ' Container: 250 mL Glass Leached: 09-17-01 Preservation: Cool Matrix: Solid Reporting CAS'Nuniber ,Analyte Concentration-� Units Limit Analyzed QC Batch ', "Method -I 7440-36-0 Antimony BRL mg/L� 0.06 09-19-01 �MM-1025-W 6010E �i 7440-38-2 Arsenic I BRL mg/L 0.02 09-18-01 MM-1025-W 60106 744041-7 Beryllium BRL mg/L 0.004 09-18-01 MM-1025-W 6010E I _ 7440-43-9 Cadmium BRL I mg/L I 0.005 09-18-01 MM-1025-W 6010E 744047-3 Chromium BRL i mg/L I 0.01 09-20-01 j. MM-1025-W 6010B J 7440-50-8 Copper BRL mg/L 0.025 09-18-01 j MM-1025-W 6010B 7439-92-1 Lead BRL mg/L 0.003 09-18-01 �_MM-1025-W 6010B 7439-97-6 Mercury BRL mg/L 0.0002 j 09-18-01 MP-1032-W 7470A 4110-02-0 Nickel BRL mg/L 0.04 09-18-01 MM-10257W 6010E I 7782-49-2 I Selenium BRL mg/L 0.005 09-18-01 MM-1025-W_ _6010B 7440-22-4 I Silver BRL i mg/L 0.01 09-18-07 MM-1025-W 6010E j 7440-28-0 Thallium BRL mg/L 0.01 r 09-18-01 I MM-1025-W 60106 ' I7440-66-6 Zinc I _ _BRL mg/L 0.2 T09-18-01 MM-1025-W 60106 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update IIF(1996). Sample prepared in accordance with EPA Method 1312 prior to determinative analysis. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 r GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report ' SPLP Matrix Spike Field ID: BOH:15-16' Category: SPLP Metals Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Laboratory ID: 44363-01 Client Bennett &O'Reilly, Inc Sampled: 02-10-00 Matrix: SPLP Leachate Received: 09-13-01 Units: mg/L ' CAS!Number. : . AnalyteT Sample;Concentratior' Spiked Measured: ,°Recovery QC:Batch Method 7440-36-0 Antimony BRL 1.0 1.0 103 % MM-1025-T 6010E ' 7440-38-2 Arsenic BRL 1.0 0.99 99% MM-1025-T 60106 744041-7 Beryllium BRL 1.0 0.99 99% MM-1025-T 6010B 7440-43-9 Cadmium BRL 1 1.0 0.97 97% MM-1025-T 6010E 744047-3 Chromium I BRL I 1.0 1.0 100% MM-1025-T 6010B 7440-50-8 Copper I BRL 1.0 0.95 95 % MM-1025-T I 6010B 7439-92-1 I Lead BRL 1.0 0.99 99% MM-1025-T 60106 7439-97-6 Mercury BRL 0.001 0.001 98 % MP-1032-T 7470A 7440-02-0 I Nickel BRL ( 1.0 1.0 100% MM-1025-T 6010B 7782-49-2 I Selenium I BRL 1.0 0.92 92 % MM-1025-T 6010B_ 7440-22-4 Silver BRL 1.0 1.0 100% MM-1025-T I 601013 47 40-28-0 I Thallium BRL 1.0 I 1.0 99 % MM-1025-T 60106 ' 7440 66 6 I Zinc _ BRL 1.0 0.96 96% MM-1025-T ,I 6010B Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III (1996). Sample ' prepared in accordance with EPA Method 1312 prior to determinative analysis: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. ' Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 Lab ID: 44363 Client: Bennett &O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 09-13-01 A. Physical Condition of Sample(s) .r This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition. The sample(s) were received undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation. B. Project Documentation This project was accompanied by satisfactory Chain of Custody documentation, with the following amendment(s) or correction(s): 1. Sample 44363-01 for SPLP Metals.analysis was received out of recommended hold time. The sample was analyzed as received per David Bennett, 09-14-01. C. Analysis of Sample(s) No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were noted b the laboratory during the processing of these Y Y rY g p g sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 ary 228 Main Street.P.O.Box 1200 si' auNowATE� r--t) -. Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ANALYTICAL Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER NMi 050'5 8 FAX(5081 759-4475 Plyjact Name: Firm: TURNAROUND t r 1r / ANALYSIS REQUEST •.fJt-ram /\�s • volaliles semlwlatiles PeslMerb/PCBs PeholeumNydroearhon Hai. Metals General Chemistry other STANDARD(10 Business Days) Extractable Vol. E.I.TPH VUI.TPH waste Project Numbed Address /l I^ ❑ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) z J(%� � �V I� I� ❑ RUSH ) - tF y -(Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) ❑ c ❑ o 3' C o Sample;Name: City/State'1/IZii�p: jI� gq (Z Please FAX _ ES Np O F e o s q r FAX Number: o m ❑ Protect Mana efi Te�phone e / BILLING a r - e E = a I (1130 Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate I n for each container(except replicates). ��33 _ m a 6 w f E d a �J 3 - ❑ - 5 Sampling Matrix Type -Containers o e - _ - e = _ ' ❑ ° - n 'e O Preservation Flaerea o n ❑ n o a o _ _ ❑ .E A a SAMPLE _ A LABORATORY W - _ _ - = o-------------- u - ❑ o ❑ IDENTIFICATION _ �E '� T- - = NUMBER _ - � //�� - m '- u - u+ (Lab Use OnIY) c m u - - _ E I zz/ f _ E crf `.�� og 22 — - _ - - - ❑ r ( I 14�J Y0 m m 2 <' m ^' m 6 m 6 m '� m o i s e o ❑ m E :° o _ REMARKS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD �/'/� (� /1 Regulatory Program Project Specific QC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. p,J L n h . �-j—�o I/ o ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require project 1)' I ✓ 3 I -R-�LWJ ❑MA DEP Form Q P R 1i 1-fished Sampler: ' Date Time ceroed by: Receipt Temperature: specific QC.Project specific QC includes Sample Duplicates, (./� ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Lab orator OC is 11t%ceivecl //�/ _ y� Specify State:_,_._ not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific QC ' - / /� `'17 RCRA/Haz.Waste Char, samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples, Relinquished Date Time ved 3Shipping/Airbill �tAP.MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additionaliNumber: Reportable Concentrationssample aliquot. - `❑RCGVJ RCS-1 protect Specific OC Required Selection of OC Sample ReOn bed Date Time by Lab story: Custody Seal/ ❑RCGW-2❑RCS-2 p Sample Duplicate ❑Selected by laboratory �\ 9 i /,.J Cooler Serial ❑.,MA Dredge Disposal / •f�� y f L. , Number: ❑Matrix Spike ❑Please use sample. ❑NH,7i RI G CT❑ME Method f Shipment: l O Courie ❑Express Mail ❑Federal r xpress c Specify Category:,_— ❑Matrix Spike Duplicate -- /0 UPS ❑Hand ❑ [[ GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Quality Assurance/Quality Control A. Program Overview Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance .program to ensure the production of high quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). ' Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GC/MS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing calibration standard. GC/MS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria_daily, or for each 12 ' hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. ' B. Definitions ' Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or ' expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate ' steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. `' y Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method 'in dealing with each ' sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. tGroundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample ' Category: SPLP Metals Matrix: Aqueous CAS Number Analyte Method QC Batch Units%Spiked Measured Recovery f QC Limits 7440-36-0 Antimony I 6010E MM-1025-TL mg/L f 1.0 -- 1.0 100% --75- 125 % 7440-38-2 Arsenic 6010B MM-1025-TL mg/L 1.0 0.97 97% 75- 125 7440-41-7 i Beryllium 6010B i MM-1025-TL mg/L 1.0 0.98 ! 98% 75 125 ' 7440-43-9 Cadmium 6010B— MM-1025-TL mg/L % 1.0 0.95 I 95 % 75- 125 % 7440-50-8 Copper 200.7 MM-1025-TL mg/L 1.0 1.0 98 % 75- 125 % 7440-47-3 Chromium 6010B MM-102 5-TL mg/L 1.0 0.94- - 94 % —75- 125%o 7439-92-1 Lead 601013 MM-1025-TL mg/L 1.0 0.96 96 % 75- 125 74-02-0 Nickel 6010B MM-1025-TL ' mg/L 1.0 0.97 97% 75- 125 7782-49-2 Selenium 6010E MW 025-TL mg/L 1.0 0.95 95 % 75- 125 % . ---- ---- -- - ---- -- -- . - ---- .. - --- ---- - - - -- - - 7440-22-4 Silver 6010B MM-1025-TL mg/L 1.0 1.0 98 % 75- 125 % ' 7440-28-0 Thallium 6010B MM-1025_TL mg/L 1.0 _ 1.0 _ 97% 75- 125%° 7440-66-6 Zinc 6010B MM 1025 TL mg/L 1.0 0.9 94% 75- 125 7439-97-6 Mercury 7470A MP-1032-11 mg/L 0.0010 0.0010 96% 75- 125 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III (1996). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, t or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. r - Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: SPLP Metals Matrix: Aqueous CAS Number Analyte Concentration Units Reporting Limit QC Batch Method ' 7440-36-0 Antimony I BRL -_! mg/L 0.06 i MM-1025-TB 60106 7440-38-2 Arsenic i BRL mg/L 0.25 MM-1025-TB 60106 _7440-41-7 Beryllium i BRL — mg/L — 0.004---,-._MM-1025-TB 60106 — 7440-43-9 Cadmium .BRL mg/L 0.05 i MM-1025-TB 60106 7440-47-3 Chromium BRL mg/L 0.1 MM-1025-TB 60106 ' 7440-50-8 Copper BRL mg/L 0.1 MM 1025-TB 60106 7439-92-1 Lead BRL mg/L 0.25 MM-1025-TB 601013 7440-02-0 Nickel BRL mg/L 0.04 MM-1025-TB 60106 7782-49-2 Selenium BRL mg/L 0.25 MM-1025-T13 60106 7440-22-4 Silver BRL mg/L 0.1 MM-1025-TB 6010E - 744 744 - - — —-- - ---- - ---- - -- -_--- -- -- --- ---=-----_ 0-28-0 ; Thallium BRL - mg/L 0.2 MM-1025-TB 60106 7440-66 6 Zinc BRL mg/L 0.5 MM-1025-TB 601013 7439-97-6 Mercury BRL mg/L 0.0002 MP-1032-TB 7470A ' Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition; Update III(1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, it any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. ' Reporting limits are adjusted foe sample dilution and sample size. s ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Certifications and Approvals CONNECTICUT, Department of Health Services, PH-0586 Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste,Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. ' MAINE, Department of Human Services, MA103 Drinking Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analytes. MASSACHUSETTS, Department of Environmental Protection, M-MA-103 Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,Fluoride, ' Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity,Total Dissolved Solids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane, Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform;Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercun,,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, ' Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DOE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated ' Biphenyls(water),Polychlorinated Biphenyls(oil). -_ - MICHIGAN, Department of Environmental Quality ' Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 t . NEW HAMPSHIRE, Department of Environmental Services, 202798 Drinking Water Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate;Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium, Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. ' RHODE ISLAND, Department of Health, 54 Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage ' Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 ' �aoota�aade3cs October 15, 2001 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' 228 Main Street Buzzards Bay, MA 02532-1200 Attention: Mr. Eric Jensen ' EAS Project Number: 01100206 Location Collected: 44935 Copies of this report and the supporting computer stored data are retained in our files in the event ' they are required for future reference. ' Any sample submitted to our laboratory will be retained for a maximum of thirty (30) days from receipt of the report. ' All analytical data, unless otherwise specified, is reported on a wet weight(as received)basis. Our laboratory is a multi-state Certified Public Health Laboratory, offering a full range of analytical ' services that include: Water and Wastewater Analysis Hazardous Waste Analysis (RCRA) Full Priority Pollutant Analysis, Drinking Water Analysis Gregory C. Lawrence Laboratory Director ' encl. 105 COMMERCIAL STREET WATERTOWN, CT 06795 PHONE (860) 274-5461 FAX(860) 945-0449 Recycled Paper GROUND YVATER ANALYTICAL ' Location Collected: 44935 Date Sample Collected: 10/02/01 Sample Description: MW-3 EAS Sample Number: 01100206-01 LIMS ID Number: AC13833 ' Date Sample Received: 10/11/01 Detection Analysis ' Parameter Data Limit Units Date Total Organic Carbon, Water 3.8 1.0 mg/L 10/12/01 BDL = Below Detection Limit GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Location Collected: 44935 Date Sample Collected: 10/02/01 ' Sample Description: MW-4 EAS Sample Number: 01100206-02 LIMS ID Number: AC 13834 Date Sample Received: 10/11/01 Detection Analysis Parameter Data Limit Units Date Total Organic Carbon, Water 5.7 1.0 mg/L 10/12/01 i 4 ' BDL = Below Detection Limit GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Location Collected: 44935 Date Sample Collected: 10/02/01 Sample Description: MW-5 EAS Sample Number: 01100206-03 LIMS ID Number: AC13835 ' Date Sample Received: 10/11/01 ' Detection Analysis Parameter Data Limit Units Date Total Organic Carbon, Water 4.6 1.0 mg/L 10/12/01 II 1 ' BDL= Below Detection Limit EAS ?roject Number: 01100206 ' Location Collected: 44935 ' EAS Certifications: ' Connecticut Certified Laboratory Number: PH 0558 Massachusetts Certified Laboratory Number: M-CT020 ' Maine Certified Laboratory Number: CT 020 ' New Jersey Certified Laboratory Number: 46647 New York Certified Laboratory Number: 10916 ' Rhode Island Certified Number: 139 The enclosed analyses were conducted in accordance with: 1. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 181h Edition, 1992 ' 2. Clean Water Act, List of Approved Test Procedures, 40 CFR 3. EPA Test Methods for the Evaluation of solid Waste, SW-846, 3rd Edition, January 1998 1 i . GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Inorganic Chemistry Field ID: MW-3 Matrix: Aqueous ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Sampled: 10-02-01 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 10-02-01 Lab ID: 44935-01 Container: 1L Plastic Preservation: Cool Reporting . Analyte Result; Units Analyzed rQC Batch Method ' . Limit` ' - Chloride 47 mg/L 0.6 10-10-01 IC-0149-W EPA 300.0 Oxygen, Dissolved 9 mg/L I 1 10-02-01 DO-0244-W EPA 360.1 ' pH 6.3 pH j N/A 10-02-01 PH-01108-W EPA 150.1 Sulfate 23 mg/L 3 10-10-01 IC-0149-W EPA 300.0 ' Method References: Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, US EPA, EPA-600/4-790-020, Revised(1983),and Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, US EPA, EPA/600/R-93/100,(1993),and Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, APHA, Eighteenth Edition (1992). ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates result, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest value that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Inorganic Chemistry Field ID: MW-4 Matrix: Aqueous ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Sampled: 10-02-01 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 10-02-01 Lab ID: 44935-02 Container: 1L Plastic Preservation: Cool ' Analyte w po Result Umts ReL m.,.'Anal'yzed QC Batch # " MetFiod,,: Chloride 150 mg/L 0.6 10-10-01 IC-0149-W EPA 300.0 Oxygen, Dissolved 9 mg/L 1 10-02-01 DO-0244-W• EPA 360.1 ' pH 5.5 I pH N/A 10-02-01 PH-01108-W EPA 150.1 Sulfate 4 mg/L 3 110-10-01 I IC-0149-W EPA 300.0 Method References: Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, US EPA, EPA-600/4-790-020,Revised(1983),and Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, US EPA, EPA/600/R-93/100,(1993),and Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, APHA,Eighteenth Edition(1992). ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates result, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest value that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. 1 1 ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200 228 Main Street Buzzards Ba MA 02532 . Yt Y, r GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Inorganic Chemistry Field ID: MW-5 Matrix: w Aqueous ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Sampled: 10-02-01 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 10-02-01 Lab ID: 44935-03 Container: 1L Plastic Preservation: Cool I Analyte Result.. Units e�m tng` Analyzed 'QC Batch Method I Chloride 22 mg/L 0.6 10-10-01 IC-0149-W EPA 300.0 Oxygen, Dissolved 9 mg/L I 1 10-02-01 DO-0244-W EPA 360.1 pH 5.6 pH N/A 10-02-01 PH-01108-W EPA 150.1 Sulfate 13 mg/L i 3 10-10-01 IC-0149-W EPA 300.0 ' Method References: Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, US EPA,EPA-600/4-790-020, Revised(1983),and Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, US EPA, EPA/600/R-93/100,(1993),and Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, ' APHA,Eighteenth Edition(1992). Report Notations: BRL Indicates result, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest value that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. ' Groundwater Analytical, .O. Box 1200 228 Main Street Buzzards Ba MA 02532 Y � Inc.,� Y� ' GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Trace Metals by ICP-AES Field ID: MW-3 Laboratory ID: 44935-04 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Sampled: 10-02-01 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 10-02-01 Container: 500 mL Plastic Preserved: 10 03-01 Preservation: HNO3/Cool Filtered: 10-03-01 ' Matrix. Aqueous �W CAS Number Analf 6 Concentration Units "ReL nrt�ng JAnalyzed QC Batch` Method 74 .... ._ , . .,; , � .. t.a 7439-89-6 Iron, Dissolved 0.26 mg/L 0.05 10-05-01 MM 1383-W I 6010B ' Method Keterence: lest Methods for evaluating Solid Waste, US LF'A,SW-84b, Ihird edition, Update III(199b). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest ' concentration that can tie reliably quantiried under routine laboratory operating conditions. Keporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. - Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Trace Metals by ICP-AES Field ID: MW-4 Laboratory ID: 44935-05 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Sampled: 10-02-01 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 10-02-01 Container: 500 mL Plastic Preserved: 10-03-01 Preservation: HNO3/Cool Filtered: 10-03-01 ' Matrix: Aqueous Reporttng� ' E CAS Number Analyte Concentration* Units . I, Analyzed sQC Batch` Method. 'Limit 7439-89-6 Iron, Dissolved 0.40 mg/L� 0.05 10-05-01 MM-1383-W 6010B Method Reference: lest Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EVA,5W-84b, I hird Edition, Update III(lyyb). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest ' concentration that can tie reliably quantitted under routine iaporatory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. 4 } Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Trace Metals by ICP-AES' Field ID: MW-5 Laboratory ID: 44935-06 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Sampled: 10-02-01 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 10-02-01 Container: 500 mL Plastic Preserved: 10-03-01 Preservation: HNO3/Cool Filtered: 10-03-01 ' Matrix Aqueous CAS'Nuniber -Analyte . Concentration Units.Reporting .;Analyied QC BatcFi 1Nethod: .. � Llm�t. w ' 7439-89-6 i Iron, Dissolved BRL mg/L 0.05 10-05-01 MM-1383-1,11 6010B Method Reterence: lest Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US LF'A,SW-846, I hird Edition, Update III(1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can oe reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Keporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. Y i Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 r GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 Lab ID: 44935 ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 10-02-01 A. Physical -of Sample(s)' 1 This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition, and the sample(s) were received ' undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation, except for the following non- conformance(s): 1. Samples 44935-04 through —06 for Dissolved Iron analysis were received unfiltered. 250mL was aliquoted from samples 44935-01 through —03 and filtered and preserved with HNO3 upon receipt. 2. 250mLs was aliquoted from samples 44935-01 through —03 for analysis of Hydrogen Peroxide. The aliquots were assigned laboratory numbers 44935-07 through —09. ' 3. 120mLs was aliquoted from samples 44935-01 through —05 into 125mL glass containers. The samples were assigned laboratory numbers 44935-10 through —12 and were analyzed for TOC, per Dave Bennett, on 10-10-01. - B. Project Documentation ' This project was accompanied b satisfactory Chain of Custody documentation. The sample container p l p Y rY Y p label(s) agreed with the Chain of Custody. C. Analysis of Sample(s) No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were noted by the laboratory during the processing of these sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification. . 1 ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 Chain of Custody Record Project Name: Lab Subcontrated To: � Sample Information Analysis Requested 15&S qqq,� Sampled By: �, s E ii Y m p oa r c E U) F- o o ? ;� - -- ? U o W o a) U) m n ' o - Remarks Lab ID# � a E �. Date Time Sample Identification a`) ° U Z E U) x U) Z U (9 0 a- U- 7 W S J 1 1V (A) ti �a1 '41) ' Reporting and Billing Information Turnaround and Special Instructions Custody Record Groundwater Analytical Results Due: - Signature Time Date ll l 228 Main St., Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 Special Instructions: �_. �� FLI (0 Relin u ed Telephone: 508-759-4441 Fax: 508-759-4475 2 /( Contact Person: Eric Jensen Old Recelved6 Purchase Order# Method 75' : USPO Express Mail ❑ Federal Express �) Hand ❑ GWA Courier ❑ Other ❑ Please Fax Report Yes ® No ❑ Shipping Label/Airbill: El MA DEP Form Required &q � �U ZSgr U GROUNDWATER Buz Main Street,P.O.Box,200 Buzzards Bay,MA02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ANALYTICAL �0�?�01 Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER Ivd 053901 FAX(508)759-4475 �roject Name: Firm: ANALYSIS REQUEST _ TURNAROUND - — - 2� ��\/// Volaulec Semlvmehles FastMeroRCes Metals PatmleumN dmurLon xa:. R,tseialrb-Aw nlhe! Q➢STANDARD(10 Business Days) _ Eh adahle Vo. EA.TP v,l.Pn Wastc _ Project Number: A ress: / II ❑ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) t I s E �- 2533 FD Q�q 110U7- ❑ RUSH(RAN-- ) Z 5 I jl (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) — ❑ ❑ ❑ �3 � ❑ .�` I I Samp:er Name: City/State/Zip: a ; 1 Please FAX— ES ❑ NO FAX Number: / o m ��Iv ry Pr ject Man a r: lephone: - - P BILLING ou u o 00oo ag ' e ' - / lJd,��lo l� LJ Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: o o ° s 9 or -Z��3 INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates). g S? o; e 2 ❑ 0 2 Sampling Matrix Type o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ o 0 6 o o o ° e E yp Container(s) Preservation Filtered tj SAMPLE LABORATORY W IDENTIFICATION 5 .. a < i 8 _ NUMBER �' W a g c e ¢ m o ' o 5 ❑ c ❑ o g W o w > s 5 S a 5 o a E 11II([Lya1bQUsleOnly) E 5 r 2` d s 5 S ❑ .;_ tg - 0 E E E S^'' E S — )4 1 l✓ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ O ❑ ❑ O 0 O ❑ E z a a 7 `�' ❑ D ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ IV` �� _ II u} 1 114 Ix-fH — —� REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD n n n Regulatory Program Project Specific OC ;dCTE.All samples submitted subject to Siandard Terms and Conditions on re:,re;se ha!aof. A- ❑Safe Drinking Water Act F------ — —_ ❑MA DEP Form Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require project R linguist, cy:ampler Date Time R� ei,3d by Re,eipi Tenpeiaiulr.. u y - -'�--------- specific QC.Project specific QC includes Sample Duplicates. Y r 1�, - . ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory OC is (/�! L,c-r.L `�r�-J�' ►-� Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC jAu jU' I I'U�l I " v'-S-— - ��a 1 —+-'-'- ❑RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samoles, 9 ouisit' Date Tima Rec d b• ah,paingiAirbill �1��. each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional yy..,, / Ali rC.7 tt - A MCP(310 CMR 40) P P q ( /�,re /�� /� Nurnher. Reportable Concentrations sample aliquot. ACGW-1 ❑RCS-, project Specific OC Required Selection of OC Sample R/ / / ate Time I Received bV Laboratory: cu::tody Seab RCGW-2❑RCS-2 ❑Sample Duplicate ❑Selected by laboratory ,� 'Cocler Serial s ❑MA Dredge Disposal // b L L .(5 �,;_ Nuriber. ❑Matrix Spike G Please use sample: r -�ss ❑NH❑RI❑CT❑ME Me hod of Shiprnent: WA Courier❑Fx ress Mail C)Federa Fxress Specify Category: ❑Matrix Spike Duplicate - 0 UPS ❑Hand ❑__— GROUNDWATER . ANALYTICAL Quality Assurance/Quality Control ' A. Program Overview Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high t quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 _(1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). ' Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented ' for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. ' All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GUMS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing ' calibration standard. GUMS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily,.or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control ' sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. B. Definitions ' Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. ' Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or ' expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate ' steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of ' interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 A GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample ' Category: Inorganic Chemistry Matrix: Aqueous Analyte Method QC Batch Units Spiked Measured" 'Reco4eryl QC Limits' ' Chloride EPA 300.0 IC-0149-W mg/L 5.0 4.9 97% 80-120 pH EPA 150.1 PH-01108-W I pH 7.0 7.0 100% 80-120% Sulfate EPA 300.0 IC-0149-W mg/L 15 15 102% 80-120% ' Method References: Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes,US EPA,EPA-600/4-790-020,Revised(1983),and Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, US EPA, EPA/600/R-93/100,(1993),and Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, ' APHA,Eighteenth Edition(1992). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. i 1 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: Inorganic Chemistry Matrix: Aqueous I Reporting -. ..° Anal a Result_ Units QCBafeh Method , .-: Lirriit w Chloride BRL mg/L 0.06 IC-0149-W EPA 300.0 Sulfate BRL- mg/L 0.3 IC-0149-W EPA 300.0 Method References: Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, US EPA,EPA-600/4-790-020, Revised(1983),and Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, US EPA, EPA/600/R-93/100,(1993),and Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, APHA, Eighteenth Edition(1992). ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates result, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest value that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. k r Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: Metals ' Matrix: Aqueous CAS''Numtier - Analyte Method QC Batch Units'y Spiked Measured " Recovery QC Limits.: ' 7439-89-6 Iron 6010E MM-1383-WB mg/L 1.0 1.0 100 % 80-120% , Method References: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III (1996). ' Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Method.Blank Category: Metals Matrix: Aqueous CAS,Number Analyte Result Units Reporting Q e Batch Method 7439-89-6 Iron BRL mg/L 0.05 MM-1383-WB 6010B Method References: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III(1996). ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates result, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest value that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. . L Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Certifications and Approvals CONNECTICUT,Department of Health Services, PH-0586 Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste, Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved ' Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium:Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. ' MAINE, Department of Human Services, MA103 Drinking Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. ' Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analytes. ' MASSACHUSETI-S, Department of Environmental Protection, M-MA-103 . Potable Water ' Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,Fluoride, Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity,Total Dissolved Solids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water ' Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated ' Biphenyls(water),Polychlorinated Biphenyls(oil). MICHIGAN, Department of Environmental Quality ' Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 NEW HAMPSHIRE, Department of Environmental Services, 202798x Drinking Water ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium, Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,Bob,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. RHODE;ISLAND;:D'epartment.of Health; 54 a, Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage ' Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 ' R r V.t - - , � � CCTV ; ' Groundwater Analytical,Inc. GROUNDWATER P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL Buz Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 ' Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 ' October 30, 2001 Ms. Kara Risk Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. ' P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Lab I D: 45624 Sampled: 10-22-01 1 Dear Kara: Enclosed is the Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis performed for the above referenced project. This project was processed for Rush turnaround. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, ' and a statement of our state certifications. . I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals ' immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. ' Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 1 Jonathan R. Sanford President ' J RS/n c Enclosures GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GGFID Field ID: MW-3 Laboratory ID: 45624-01 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0936-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 10-22-01 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 10-29-01 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 10-29-01 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 10-30-01 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH Ranges Concentration Units Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' I BRL ug/L 500 1 ' n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L j 500 j n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons j _ 380 _ j ug/L j 160 4 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 440 ug/L 160 CAS Number Target AnaIlytes Concentration Units Reporting Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene _BRL ug/L i 10 j 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene ! _38 I ug/L 5 i ' 85-01-8 Phenanthrene _ _ _ BRL ! ug/L 1 10 _83-32-9 -Acenaphthene _ BRL -- ;_ ug/L 10 QC Surrogate Compounds Recovery QC Limits ' Fractionation: 2_Fluorobiphenyl _ _ 75 % _ j 40- 140 ----,-- 2-Bromonaphthalene__- -__-.._--_ _ 70 % _ 40- 140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 63 % j 40- 140 ' ortho-Terphenyl 78 % 40- 140 % _ QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes ' ' 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances.indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative 1 and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter, project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest ' concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. ' 0 n-Cl1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200 228 Main Street Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 j GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 Lab ID: 45595 ' Client: Bennett &O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 10-29-01 A. Physical Condition of Sample(s) i . This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition. The sample(s) were received ' undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation.. B. Project Documentation This project was not accompanied by Chain of Custody documentation, with the following amendment(s) or ' correc-ion(s): 1. Sample 45624-01 was analyzed according to the container labels, per Kara Risk, 10-26-01. 2. Sample 45595-01 for analysis by MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum ' Hydrocarbons was filtered by the laboratory prior to analysis. C. Analysis of Sample(s) — ' No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were noted by the laboratory during the processing of these sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification.' ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 L 22 Main GROUND WE Buz ads Street, 02 Box z 1200 A F ALYTIC.4i L Telephone(508)755-4441 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD FAX(508)759-4475 AND WORK ORDER t� I�Projeci Name: ��.r ,.r Firm: - TURNAROUND _i✓4 N16 HA r✓1 �;,a� l�- � C' ��r��Y��rlC ANALYSIS REQUEST Proiact Number. ❑ STANDARD 00 Business Days) volatiles Semivo!atiles Pest/Herb/PCBs _ Address: Metals Pekolevm aroearbon Naa. c—; % _ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) _ _ Extractable Vol. ExI.TPH VaI.TPH Waste ;eneral Chemistry Other D .�1 � ❑ USH(RAN- ) x s s r Sampler Name: (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) o o r City i State/Zip: a = 0 ❑ 0 „3 00 V _�Ar--A NI Sr` {� � Please FAX _ L �ST ❑ YES p NO r�l. �1� M� GL �a� FAX Number: o Project Alan,.ger. Telephone: m 0 BILLING " 2 t F{✓ic) 'f�cNhJcTr- ° ° ❑ o 0 0 0 0 ' y Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: P 4 NSTRUCTIONS.Use set: rate line for a o I each container(except replicates). g t ' to tripling N 7 ❑ ❑ I i Matrix Type Container(s) >oa > E_ , - r❑_ l o a I❑o aO° -❑o 2 ❑r" C Preservation Filtered LABORATORY f>IAsi s_° ❑ce" °o❑I+II<c IIIClIDEP: IFICATION pNUMBER 5 l o r SE E a (Lab Use Only) / � 1� n OOto Ovv- O ❑E,MPI jII III tI I!IIt n'❑ C OIC C O r.' TIM, .. I----- -- i---- , - J I 1 i ---L I `-- - , l '- 4- T —1 I- REMARKS/SPl I:IAL INSTRUCTIONS -f—, �_L_�.+ DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES it _-. et-1 , I Regulatory Program CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ` 4. t— / 4 P[(.! f s �i r g Project Specific OC / W' ! �r['ttt ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Man regulatory NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions ,n reverse hereof MA DEP Form Y 9 story Programs and EPA methods require project Relinquished by Sampler: Dal. ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act specific OC.Project specific QC includes Sample Duplicates, a Time Received by: p y Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix S ike Duplicates.Laboratory OC is y' i Ner=_ipt Temperature: S eci State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC 0 RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per samDle basis For water samples, Relinquished by: Date�I Yl L-'a Qi 1 G✓ -TV /�/1�x/ ❑MA MCP(310 CMR 40 each MS M 9 p Relin Received b j J ` S r 15 Reportable Concentrations p aliquot. and Sample Duplicate requires q es an additional Time {( �� sample all Y ShiFping;girbiit li ka/r /\I!J Ili -Z-G�— C1 ❑RCGW t ❑RCS 1 Number: Project Specific OC Rebuked Selection of OC Sample Relinquished by: ❑RCGW-2 p RCS-2 Date Time Received b Laboratory: Custod ❑MA Dredge Disposal O Sample Duplicate O Selected by laboratory Y rY' Y Seal/ / O Matrix Spike 1 p O Cooler Serial c4 Lr�Cr ❑NH❑RI p CT O ME O Please use sample: � al 7 ,N�c-iber;- Specify Category: G Method of Shipment:Matrix Spike Ouplicate ❑GWA Courier p Express Mail O Federal Expres V 0 UPS 0 Hand 0 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL I ' Quality Assurance/Quality Control A. Program Overview Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high ' quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked ' with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GC/MS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing calibration standard. GC/MS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 ' hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation ' batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. tB. Definitions ' Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate ' steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. Q ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-0936-F Matrix: Water Units: ug/L CAS Number Analyte Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits j 111-8432 n-Nonane(C9) 50 I 24 j 49% 40- 140 629-59-4 n-Tetradecane(C14) 50 28 56% 1 40- 140 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(C19) j 50 31 62 % 40- 140 % j 1 12-95-8 n-Eicosane(C20) j 50 32 63 % 40- 140 630 02-4 n-Octacosane(C28) 50 30 L 60% 40-140 /° 91-20-3 Naphthalene j 50 j 30 j 60% 40- 140 % I 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 50 34 68% 40- 140%° j QC Surrogate Compounds j Recovery QC Limits. ' Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80 % ! 40- 140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene 74 % 40- 140 % I Extraction: Chloro-oetadecane 62 % 40- 140 % i ortho-Terphenyl I 77 % — 40- 140% -- -- ' Method Reference: Method for Ithe Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, ' or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. T y Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-0936-F Matrix: Water I EPH Ranges Concentration Units I Reporting limit ' n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 500 i n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 I n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons"' BRL ug/L 160 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' BRL ug/L 160 CAS Number Target Analytes Concentration Units Resorting limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L j 10 ' 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene _ BRL ug/L __ 5 85-01-8 _! Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 10_ 83_32-9 Acenaphthene -.--------BRL ug/L 10 j ' QC Surrogate Compounds Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: ! 2-Fluorobiphenyl 7_8 % _ 40- 140 %_ i 2-Bromonaphthalene _s 64 % �_ 40- 140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane _ 62 % _ 40- 140 % ortho-Terphenyl ___ 77 % 40- 140 % I ' Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. ' t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Certifications and Approvals ' CONNECTICUT, Department of Health Services, PH-0586 Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste, Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, t Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. MAINE, Department of Human Services, MA103 Drinking Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. ' Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analytes. ' MASSACHUSETTS, Department of Environmental Protection, M-MA-103 _ l Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium;Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,Fluoride, ' Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity,Total Dissolved Soiids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform,Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, ' Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated Biphenyls(water),Polychlorinated Biphenyls(oil). ' MICHIGAN Department of Environmental Quality — Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 NEW HAMPSHIRE, Department of Environmental Services, 202798 Drinking Water Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium,. Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Orthophosphate;TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, ( Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. RHODE ISLAND, Department of Health, 54 Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER Groundwater Analytical, Inc. P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL Buz Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 November 30, 2001 ' Ms. Kara Risk Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 ' Brewster,.MA 02631 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Lab I D: 46089 Sampled: 11-13-01 Dear Kara: Enclosed is the Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis performed for the above referenced ' project. This project was processed for Standard Two Week turnaround. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this t report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, and a statement of our state certifications. ' I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to ' the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Jonatha9R. anford y ' President JRS/dem Enclosures t . 1 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GGFID Field ID: MW-3 Laboratory ID: 46089-01 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0945-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 11-13-01 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 11-14-01 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 11-15-01 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 11-29-01 ' Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic: 1 EPH Ranges Concentration Units IReporting Limit n-C9 to_n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t j BRL ug/L 530 j ' n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ' I — BRL _j ug/L ; 530 I n-C1 1 to n_C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons'° 230 ug/L 170 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 240 _ _ ug/L 170 ' QC Surrogate Compounds Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 81 % 40-140 _ 2-Bromonaphthalene' _ _ ___ 60 % _ 40-140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane - _ 74 % {_-- 40- 140 ortho-Terphenyl v 81 % 40- 140 QA/QC Certification ' 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative ' and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,_project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed ' utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. . Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-Cl 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyze concentrations. 1 - 1 1 r r . ' Groundwater Analytical, In eInc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER j ANALYTICAL ' Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 Lab ID: 46089 ' Client: Bennett &O'Reilly Received: 11-14-01 A. Physical Condition of Sample(s) _7 This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition. The sample(s) were received undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation. B. Project Documentation This project was not accompanied by satisfactory Chain of Custody documentation, with the following amendment(s) or correction(s): 1. Sample 46089-01 for analysis by MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons was filtered prior to analysis as.indicated on the Chain of Custody. C. Analysis of Samples) No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were noted by the laboratory during the processing of these ' sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification. 1 1 , 1 ' ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATERBuz Main Street,PO.Box 1200 ��1~! � Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ' ANALYTICAL ��vi Av" Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER i�2 05338- _. FAX(508)759-4475 Project Name: Fir n ^A TURNAROUND r ANALYSIS REQUEST Semivolatiles Pest/Herh/PCas Petroleum tlracarhan Hax. STANDARD 10 Business Days) Edraclaale Val. Melals General Chemistry Other Project Num r: Address: ( Y ) Est.TPH VOI.TPH Waste �l 22 ❑ PRIORITY 5 Business Days) G' RUSH(RAN--- ) a - ampler Name: ,' (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 H 3 0 D 9 ty i S tate!Zip: _ Number: m Please FAX YEAS ❑ NO FAX ��1JJ��J VciCl _ O"I 4:y�,�}- � � ❑ t Protect Manager' j'elephone: - BILLING - `� j �rL ° � o ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ m Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.. ° = _ W o a m - A t t^!S'i RUCTEONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates). o a a e Sampiin� Matrix Type Container(s) Preservation Filtered 0 D 0 0 o n n o $ o c 6 0 o E _ ° o I I I SAMPLE a „ = - LABORATORY W a o m o ° ❑ a IDENTIFICATION a .. o s a a NUMBER �" J e J = = 3 a 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ I jE = (Lab Use Only) m m e _ _ _ 5 > S q E E 3 E p E 5 o 5 o d c U m v r ¢ o m O A c c o o° v` — 3 z' f Si u m a cs i u❑ c u m ❑ ❑ o o ❑ o o o ❑ ❑ 6 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 00 D 0 2•L�Zi - IIH - 2 1 REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ,b �t: �—� Regulatory Program Project Specific QC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. 1` ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require ro ❑MA DEP Form specific QC.Project specific QC includes Sample project e P j Duplicates, Ra!17uished by Sampler: Date Time Received by: Receipt Temperature: 1 ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory QC is �/�k �, �^O l ' aiCJ(L Specify State:._, not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC El,, RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples. Relinquished b : Date Time Shipping/Airbill ��-L= 110A MCP(31C�CMR 40) each MS.MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional Number: Reportable Concentrations sample aliquot. \ ACGW-1 O RCS-1 Pro Relin � e b Project Specific OC Required Selection of OC Sample q Y' Date Time Re eived by rat Custody Seal/ O RCGW-2 ;.,RCS-2 ;_; Cooler Serial Sample Duplicate ❑Selected b laho'ator - ,Number: C MA Dredge Disposal Y Y 7 C NH C RI O CT O ME ❑Matrix Spike O Please use sample: Method of Shipme � ��GWA Courier❑Express Mail ❑Federal Express �� Specify Category.____ 0 Matrix Spike Duplicate - UPS 0 Hand❑ GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Quality Assurance/Quality Control ' A. Program Overview Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high ' quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented ' for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. ' All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GC/MS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing calibration standard. GUMS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation ' batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. ' B. Definitions ' Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. ' Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or ' expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate ' steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of ' interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-0945-F ' Matrix: Water Units: ug/L CAS Number Analyte j Spiked Measured Recovery'' QC Limits 111-84-2 n-Nonane(C9) 50 29 59% j 40-140 629-59-4 n-Tetradecane(C14) 50 36 f 72 % i 40-140 ' 629 92-5 n-Nonadecane(C19) - 50 43 85 % — ! 40-140 % I 112-95-8 n-Eicosane(C20) 50 44 i 88% i 40-140 % 630-02-4 n-Octacosane.(C28) 50 42 85 % 40-140 % ' QC Surrogate Compounds Recovery 1 QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl _ 91 % _ 40- 140_% _ 2-Bromonaphthalene_ 51 % _ 40- 140 % Extraction: _-4 Chloro-octadecane_ — — - 91 %'- _ _ 40- 140 ortho-Terphenyl 97 % 40- 140%° Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum,Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. 1 ' Groundwa ter Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: MA DEP EPH Method ' QC Batch ID: EP-0945-F Matrix: Water EPH Ranges IConcentration Units Reporting Limit i n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons j BRL ug/L 500 i n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons', BRL ug/L 1, 500 ! n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t° BRL ! ug/L 160 ' Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t __ BRL ug/L j _160 QC Surrogate Compounds Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl _ __ 69 % 40- 140 ' 2-Bromonaphthalene 43 % _ 40- 140 % _ Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 57 % 40- 140 ortho-Terphenyl -- ---__71 % — _--- ----40-_14_0_°/° ' Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. t Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. ' 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Certifications and Approvals CONNECTICUT, Department of Health Services, PH-0586 Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste,Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. C. MAINE, Department of Human Services, MA103 Drinking Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. ' Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analytes. D. MASSACHUSETTS, Department of Environmental Protection, M-MA-103 Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,Fluoride, ' Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,total Alkalinity,Total Dissolved Solids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform,Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, ' Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia•N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated ' Biphenyls Iwaterl,Polychlorinated Biphenyls toil). --- --- E. MICHIGAN, Department of Environmental Quality ' Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 F. NEW HAMPSHIRE, Department of Environmental Services, 202798 Drinking Water Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium ' Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. ' RHODEISLAND, Department of Health, 54 Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 'w3;..-t y ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc. GROUNDWATER P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL Buz Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 ' Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 ' December 24, 2001 Ms. Kara Risk Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. ' P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 ' Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 Lab I D: 46977 Sampled: 12-17-01 Dear Kara: ' Enclosed is the Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis performed for the above referenced project. This project was processed for Priority One Week turnaround. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, ' and a statement of our state certifications. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals ' immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. ' Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, �Vc ' Jonathan R. Sanford President ' J RS/kh Enclosures t GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-3 Laboratory ID: 46977-01 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0963-F ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 12-17-01 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 12-17-01 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 12-19-01 ' Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 12-20-01 Dilution Factor Aliphatic:1 Aromatic: 1 I EPHiRangest.` 'Concentration �,`F `..Units Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 560 ' I n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 560 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t j 220 ug/L 180 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 270 I ug/L 180 ' CAS Number Target Analytes. Concentration Units. lReporting Limit 91-20-3 ; Naphthalene _ BRL _ j ug/L 11 _ 91-57-6 _' 2-Methylnaphthalene _ — 34 _ i ug/L j 6 85 O1 8 Phenanthrene BRL — _ j ug/L— 11 83-32-9 Acena hthene --------- ' p I _ BRL--------- ug/L i 11 I QC Surrogate Compounds Recovery.,.' s`QC Limits'. Fractionation: I 2-Fluorobiphenyl ; 64 % _ ( _ 40- 140% _ - — 2-Bromonaphthalene _ ( 60 % 40-140 % _ Extraction: Chloro-octad_ecane 57 % _ 40- 140 / ortho-Terphenyl _ j 60 % ! 40- 140% I -_---- --_ w QA/QC Certification. -----�--- ---_----- — 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter, project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. _ ' Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-CI1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Lab ID: 46977 ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Received: 12-17-01 A. Physical Conditid6 of Samples) " This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition.. The sample(s) were received undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation. B. Project Documentation This project was accompanied by satisfactory Chain of Custody documentation, with the following amendment(s) or correction(s): 1. Sample 46977-01 for analysis by MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons was filtered prior to analysis as indicated on the Chain of Custody. C. Analysis of Sample(s) No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were noted by the laboratory during the processing of'these sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 r rr rr rr rr r r r r r r r r rir rr rr rr r■ �r 228 Main Street,P.O.Box 1200 GROUNDWATER Buzzards Bay,MA02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD �� 055937 ANALYTICAL A 6C1�9 A Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER L FAX(508)759-4475 P ject Name: Firm: < TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST _ ��v` volaliles Semimatiles PesllHar6 Cas Metals Petroleum Hydrocarbon Her. General Chemistry Other S ANDARD(10 Business Days) Ealactahle vol. Exl.TPH vnI.TPH waste Projectt`^Nl�umb Address: 1.PRIORITY(5 Business Days) - _ A _ z I �(d�� CC��/� N o c - o f p ' �O 41 tC - ❑ RUSH(RAN• ) - a o _ (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ -3 0 ❑ ter Na City/State/Zip: a Please FAX CrYES p NO v 2n z FAX Number: ��- o ❑ - c ti Project a Mana1�(gn/ear:./ Te phone: BILLING o 0 0 0 0 0 00 a a U Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: o ° = _ _JL_JLJ ❑ 9 a z ( gq ,33 0 m w z a fl - INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates). � - N m o o o m e o SamplingMatrix Type Container(s) Preservation Fitee o ❑ e ❑ ❑a a __ a r E SAMPLE _ LABORATORY W d e b A e 8 - o " m IDENTIFICATION s' zi o d e _ - NUMBER �" = _ - ? a a ; ❑ A _ x ❑ ° w w o w > a !ESo �_ (Lab Use Only) Zj > c ° o y F S > > E 5 5 E __' a z O f — ii E E R R E E S' s S' E — 0 2 J m $ m m m m o m o n c m y v i q ° o at $ � `I0 � 2 _ a 3 w �'z f _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ F] ❑ ❑ J' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ O �ii L .3 REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD h F Regulatory Program Project Specific OC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. /Ulpt"p'n"r(r'y�_ ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require project R linquished by Sampler: Date Time Received by: Receipt Temperature: ❑MA DEP Form specific QC.Project specific QC includes Sample Duplicates, 17 NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.taboratory QC is n - Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC o r 9� V C-11— e ❑RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples, ReAl nquished Date Time Received by: blu Shipping/Airbill �A MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional Number: ortable Concentrations sample aliquot. Wrl Y ,J �,� �, CGW-1 ❑RCS•1 Project Specific OC Required Selection of OC Sample Relinquished by: Date Time eceived by Labor Cory: Custody Seal/ /❑RCGW-2❑RCS-2 - / Cooler Serial ❑Sample Duplicate O Selected by laboratory k i ❑MA Dredge Disposal ❑Matrix Spike /771�� l r q; /�'� i Number: ❑NH 0 RI 0 CT 0 ME p ❑Please use sample: Method of Shipment: GWA Courier 0 Express Mail 0 Federal Express Specify Category: D Matrix Spike Duplicate r6PS 0 Hand 0 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Quality Assurance/Quality Control A. Program Overview Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and ' Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). ' Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented ' for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GUMS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing calibration standard. GUMS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. B. Definitions Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. ' laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of ' interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER t ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: MA DEP EPH Method ' QC Batch ID: EP-0963-F Matrix: Water Units: ug/L CAS Number Analyte,, Spiked: Measured 'Recovery a QC Limits y 111-84-2 j n-Nonane(0) 50 j 25 1 51 % 40- 140 % 629-59-4 j n-Tetradecane(C14) 50 j 30 { 60% j 40- 140 % 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(C19) 50 37 I 74% j 40- 140 % j 112-95-8 j n-Eicosane(C20) 50 I 39 j 77% j 40-140% 630-02-4 n-Octacosane(C28) j 50 35 70% 40- 140 91-20-3 Naphthalene 50 27 53 % 40- 140 % 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 50 j 30 _j 60% _�40 QC Surrogate,Compounds ":: Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl j 78 % _ _ 40- 140 % ' 2-Bromonaphthalene j 71 % _ 40- 140 Extraction: I Chloro-octadecane 76 %_ _ i _ 40- 140 % I _ ortho-Terphenyl 66 % — _ ! _ _ 40- 140 % Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,'MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch I D: EP-0963-F Matrix: Water EPH.Aanges Concentration U'nits ,' Reporting im t ' n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 500 j n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 160 ' Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L I 160 CAS Number' Target Analyte§ Concentration Units Reporting:Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 10 91-57_6 2-Methylnaphthalene BRL ug/L __Jr5 85-01-8 _ Phenanthrene _ _ BRL ug/L + 10 j i 83-32-9 _ _i Acenaphthene BRL _ —I ug/L I 10 QC.Sur."rogate°Compounds ,f Recovery. , ",.QC Limits ', Fractionation: j 2-Fluorobiphenyl 46 % 40- 140 % e� 1---- _ 12-B_romonaphthalene ; 41 % 40- 140 %_ Extraction:-- Chloro-octad _ ecane � 78 % — — ; 40- 140 ortho-Terphenyl _ 77% 40. 140 % Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Certifications and Approvals F_ CONNECTICUT, Department of Health Services, PH-0586 Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste, Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved ' Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. C. MAINE, Department of Human Services, MA103 ' Drinking Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. ' Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analytes. D. MASSACHUSETTS, Department of Environmental Protection, M-MA-103 ' Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,Fluoride, Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity,Total Dissolved Solids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform,Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics; Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated Biphenyls Iwaterl,Polychlorinated Biphenyl,(oil). ' E. MICHIGAN, Department of Environmental Quality J Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 F. NEW HAMPSHIRE, Department of Environmental Services, 202798 Drinking Water Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium, Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. RHODE'_ISLAND, Department of Health 54 Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 JAN ti i Groundwater Analytical, Inc. GROUNDWATER P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL Buzzards Main Street Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 ITelephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 IJanuary 18, 2002 IMs. Kara Risk Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. I P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 I Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 Lab I D: 47562 Sampled: 01-10-02 IDear Kara: Enclosed are the Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses performed for the above referenced project. This project was processed for Priority One Week turnaround. I This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformance-,, a brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, Iand a statement of our state certifications. " I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining ,the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, G .. Jonathan R. Sanford President J RS/nc Enclosures 1 - r GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-1 Laboratory ID: 47562-01 r Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Client: Bennett &O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 01-11-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 01-15-02 r Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 01-16-02 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH Ranges Concentration _Units Reporting Limit, n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL i ug/L 500 I n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL i ug/L ; 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons i° BRL ug/L 160 Unadjustedn_C1 I to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons --__ _ -- —BRL _-- ug/L 1-60— r QC Surrogate Compounds _ Recovery _—__�- QC.Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 90 % ' 40- 140 j r 2-Bromonaphthalene 84 % 40 140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 86 % 40 140 ortho-Terpl: nyl 91 % 40- 140 i° _ QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.32 No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrat:ve r and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter, project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determ.nation of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction oerforr:ied r utilizing separatory funnei technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. r t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards elut;ng it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations r r r r � r Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GGFID Field ID: MW-2 Laboratory ID: 47562-02 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 01-11-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 01-15-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 01-16-02 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic: 1 Aromatic:1 EPH Ranges Concentration• Units Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL' __ ug/L j 500 _n-C19 to nn-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' - - _ BRL ug/L I_ 500 - F n C1 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t° _ BRL _ ug/L _- 160_ Unadjusted n-C11 to n=C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t — BRL _ - j- Tug/L_ ; 1_60 ' QC Surrogate Compounds Recovery— QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 91 % 40-.140 % _ 2-Bromonaphthalene 82 % 40 140 % i Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 78 % 40- 140 - ----=-ortho_Terphenyl---- - --- -- --86 %...-------- --- -- 40- 140 % ---! QA/QC Certification ' I. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes l 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter, project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report_ Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed t utilizing.separatory funnel.technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. ' t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-3 Laboratory ID.: 47562-03 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 01-11-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 01-15-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 01-16-02 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH Ranges _ Concentrations Umts eport 1 Rmg Li mtt -11 n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L ! 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 _ -- -- - n-C1 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t° 280 ug/L j 160 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' 330 f ug/L — 160-- QC Surrogate Compounds _ j Recovery ---� QC Limit Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 96 % 40- 140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene 83 % - 140 % ------------ Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 76 % 40- 140 % ortho-Terphenyl 90 % 40- 140 % QA/QC Certification ' 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 1 1.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrat ve ' and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed ' utilizingseparatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRI_ Indicates concentration, if any, �s below reporting iimit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. ' t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting ii that range. 0 n-Cl 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. t , Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GGFID Field ID: MW-4 Laboratory ID: 47562-04 ' Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 01-11-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 01-15-02 ' Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 01-17-02 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic: 1 Aromatic: 1 _EPH Ranges Concentration Units Reporting Limit! n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ! ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t _ BRL ug/L_ 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons'° BRL ug/L 160 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons r BRL , ug/L 160 QC Surrogate Compounds -� _Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 88 % i 40- 140 -2- -------- ---- _.. -- - ---- .—_... --- --- ----- -- 2-Bromonaphthalene 64 % 40 - 140 % - - -- — - — p - v — -- -- -- - - Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 79 % 40 140 ortho-Ter hen I 82 % ( 40- 140 % QA/QC Certification I 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/accepance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of This data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter, project narrative ano quality control report are ccnsidered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed ' utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentratior, that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. ' t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations, r h -3 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 1 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GGFID. Field ID: MW-5 Laboratory ID: 47562-05 ' Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 01-11-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 01-15-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 01-17-02 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic: 1 Aromatic: 1 EPH Ranges Concentration Units Reporting Limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' _ _ _BRL _ ug/L j 50_0 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t _-- _ -BRL i --ug/L — 500_— n-C1 1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons'° BRL j ug/L 160 ' Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t _- --_ BRL _— __-ug/L :-- 160 QC Surrogate Compounds -_ Recovery QC Limits — Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 84 % 40- 140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene 73 % — 40- 140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 73 % 40- 140 ortho-Terphenyl 76 % 40- 140 _ --- - QA/QC Certification ---- -_ - __ ------ ---—i ' 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 1 1.3? No ' Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data.is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report.- Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizingseparatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. ' t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. - Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) ' MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW-1 Laboratory ID: 47562-01 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 01-11-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 01-15-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 01-16-02 Dilution Factor: ' 1 ' CAS Number— Analyte — Concentration Units Reporting Limit' 91-20-3 ' Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene j BRL ' ug/L 0.5 1 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene _ BRL I ug/L 0.5 1, ' 83-32-9 ! Acenaphthene BRL ' ug/L 0.5 j 86-73-7 I Fluorene j — BRL I ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 _ Phenanthrene - — BRL ug/L 0.5 f ' 120-12-7 ; Anthracene-- ' BRL -- _' ug/L 0.5 _20_644-0 i Fluoranthene ( BRL_ ' ug/L 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L 0.5 - --------- ----- _56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene _i BRL ug/L 218-01-9 1 --- .---- ---C--h. sene—--- -----__—___ BR-L _ _—_- ug/ 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL ug/L i 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ' BRL I ug/L _ 0.1 50 32 8 I Benzo[a]PYrene ' BRL i ug/L —0.1 - - -- -- 193 39 5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,dIpyrene BRL u L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL - u L 0.1 191-24-2 Benzo h i] a lene -----' _[g, PrY_ . - BRL ug/L I-- 0.1 QC Surrogate Compound I R_ecove_ry - QC Limits —ortho-Ter hen I --------- P-- Y ------------------- 1---------- - 83 % _.. -- I _ 40- 140 % t '� Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA.SW-846,Third Edition, Update III (1996). Analvte list ' as specified by the target analvtes of the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM) in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for anaMe. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adiusted for sample dilution and sample size. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) ' MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW-2 Laboratory ID: 47562-02 ' Project: Birmingham/0099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 01-11-02 Preservation: H2104/Cool Extracted: 01-15-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 01-16-02 Dilution Factor: 1 ' CAS Number Analyte Concentration - :Units Reporting Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene — BRL ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene ! BRL ( ug/L 0.5 ' 83-32_9 j Acenaphthene BRL ( ug/L 0.5 j 86-73-7 t Fluorene _ BRL _ ug/L 0.5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene __ BRLug/L 0.5 ' 120-12-7 L Anthracene BRL ug/L 0.5 206-44-0 Fluoranthene BRL ug/L _ 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL _ug/L 0.5 56 55-3 j Benzo[a]anthracene _BRL ug/L 0.1 218-01_9 _ _ Chrysene BRL ug/L — 0.1 205-99-2 Benzo[k]fluoranthene j BRL j ug/L 0.1 I 207 08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL l ug/L 0.1 I 50 32 8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 j 193 39_5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthrace_ne_ j- BRL ug/L 0.1 } 191-24-2 _ Benzo[g,In,i]Perylene -- -�--- -- _ BRL --- ug/L T---0.1----� ' QC Surrogate Compound Recovery QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl — _ _- - __- 78 40- 140 % I ' Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III (1996). Analvte list as specified by the target analvtes of the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM) in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration. if any. is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street,.Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) ' MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW-3 Laboratory ID: 47562-03 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 01-11-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 01-15-02 1 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 01-16-02 Dilution Factor: 1 ' CAS Number Analyte Concentration. Units Reporting Limitl 91-20-3 ! Naphthalene j BRL ug/L ) 0.5 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene ! 27 I ug/L 1.0 I 208-96-8 1; Acenaphthylene BRL ! ug/L 0.5 ' 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 1.4 j ug/L 1 0.5 _86-73-7 Fluorene _— 1.6 I ug/L 0.5 851-01-8 Phenanthrene -- _ 0.9 _ —ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 1 Anthracene — ! BRL j ug/L 0.5 ' 206 44-0 Fluoranthene _ _ _ BRL i - ug/L - 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL ug/L_ _0.5 I _56-55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L _ 0.1 _ ' -218=01-9---- Chrysene ----- -- ------ ---- BRL u�L-- — 0.1_ 205-99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1 BRL ; ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL - _ ug/L —0_1 50-32-8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL I _ug/L 01 193-39-5 Indeno[1,2,3 c,d]pyrene BRL { ug/L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a h]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 -- - --- ---- -=--- - --- --- -------... 191-24-2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BRL � ug/L I 0.1 QC Surrogate Compound Recovery QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl_ — ; — _ 79 % 40- 140 % ' Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition. Update III (1996). Analvte list as specified by the target analvtes of the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM) in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons. - Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for anaMe. Reporting Limit is the lowest ' concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adiusted for sample dilution and sample size. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW-4 Laboratory ID: 47562-04 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 01-11-02 Preservation: H2504/Cool Extracted: 01-15-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 01-16-02 Dilution Factor: 1 ' CAS Number Analyte." Concentration Units Reporting Limit 91-20-3 I Naphthalene BRL ug/L 0.5 j 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL j ug/L 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL ug/L 0.5 ' 83-329 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene _ _ BRL ug/L 0.5 j 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL_ i ug/L 0.5 ' 120-12-7 Anthracene — j BRL j ug/L 0.5 206-44-0 i Fluoranthene _BRL ug/L _ 0.5 129-00-0 Pyrene BRL j ug/L 0.5 56-55-3 i Benzo[a]anthracene BRL ug/L 0.1 j ' 218-01-9 ! Chrysene BRL - � �_ ug/L -_ 0.1- 205-99=2 - I Benzo[b]fluoranthene j BRL ug/L 0.1 i 207-08-9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BRL ug/L 0.1 50 32 8 Benzo[a]pyrene I BRL ! ug/L i 0.1 j 193 39-5 I Indeno[1,2 3 c,d]pyrene BRL ug/L 0 1 --- - -. .-. — - - 53 70 3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene I BRL ug/L 0.1 i 191 24-2 I Benzo[g h i]perylene--- - _ BRL --L - _ QC Surrogate Compound Recovery QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl _ __ — 75 _ _ 40- 140 ' Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III(1996). Analvte list as specified by the target analvtes of the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hvdrocarbons. Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM) in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hvdrocarbons. ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if anv. is below reporting limit for analvte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliablv Quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adiusted for sample dilution and sample size. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street,Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8270C (Modified) MA DEP EPH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC/MS-SIM Field ID: MW-5 Laboratory ID: 47562-05 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 01-11-02 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 01-15-02 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 01-16-02 Dilution Factor: 1 CAS Number Analyte f Concentration Units Reporting Limit; j 91-20-3 i Naphthalene BRL ug/L I 0.5 91-57-6 j 2-Methyl naphthalene j BRL _ ug/L 1 0.5 1 j 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene BRL _ ug/L 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene - _ BRL ug/L 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene _ I BRL ug/L I 0.5 i 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL ug/L 0.5 ' 120-12-7 Anthracene —_-_ — BRL -- I ug/L ! 0.5 206-4_4-0 _Fluoranthene BRL ! ug/L i 0.5 129-00-0 —_ Pyrene I __ BRL ug/L 0.5 56 55-3 Benzo[a]anthracene j _ _BRL, j ug/L 0.1 j ' 218-01_9 _ Chrysene_ _� _ —BRL ug/L 1 0.1 _ 1 205 99-2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene BRL i ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 :-Benzo[klfluoranthene BRL 1 ug/L 0.1 —i 50 32 8 Benzo[a]pyrene BRL - ug/L 0.1 I 193 39 5 Indeno[1,2,3-c d]pyrene BRL j ug/L I 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL — _j— ug/L i 0.1 —.. - ---- _ ._.._ { 191-24-2 Benzo[g,_h,i e lene BRL ug/L ! 0.1 -- - - 1 lP rY -- --- QC Surrogate Compound Recovery QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl _ 70 % 40- 140 % ' Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA.SW-846,Third Edition, Update III (1996). Analvte list as specified by the target analvtes of the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hvdrocarbons. Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM)in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hvdrocarbons. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if anv, is below reporting limit for analvte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliablv quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adiusted for sample dilution and sample size. e. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER 1 ANALYTICAL ' -Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Lab ID: 47562 ' Client: Bennet &O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 01-11-02 A. Physical Condition of Sample(s) 1 This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition. The sample(s) were received undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation. B. Project Documentation This project was accompanied by satisfactory Chain of Custody documentation, with the following ' amendment(s) or correction(s): 1. Samples 47562-01 through —05 for analysis by MA DEP Method for the.Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons, were filtered by the laboratory prior to analysis, as per the Chain of Custody. CC. Analysis of Sample(s) No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were noted by the laboratory during the processing of these sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification. r tGroundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER Buz ands Bay, P.O.Box 1200 Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ANALYTICAL Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER Np 057850 FAX(508)759-4475 Project Name: Firm: 0 TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST yolalile5 SemiVolallles Pell/Herh/PCBs Pelrole-Hydrocarbon Haz. ❑STANDARD(10 Business Days) Metals General Chemistry Other Extractable Vol. ErI.TPH UoI.TPH waste Proyect IN r' AEI res _� I�� 1 � PRIORITY(5 Business Days) - _ _ E a - J� 11 ❑ RUSH(RAN- ) E (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) ❑ "� ;� ❑ 3 ❑ ❑ ' SYmpfl�er NamJg City State/Zip: / 1 I t lid'/C Please FAX �c` p FAX Number: _ �) �0 / N o ❑ Prroiect Mana/�er' Telephone: / = o - c �I�JL�� BILLING n A a _ - Purchase OrderrNNo.: GWA Reference No.: �I LL INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates).-� - _- y _ ❑ I' Sampling Matrix Type Contalner(s) Preservation Filtered o 0 o u c u c n I SAMPLE _ LABORATORY a = - Q o ° IDENTIFICATION _ - s _ - = NUMBER �y - _ _ - o o _ E r w o w U E > j 5 - m (Laabl/Use Only) 5. E E LO.-I $ m v - v m o ie _ - _ _ _ _ = fl _ - R - ❑ G - f, - TQi ❑ 7 CI "- ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ 7 f, ❑ ❑ J - ❑ I ❑ ❑ ❑ L ❑ C ❑ rl fl lu I f� 1 IrAIIII ' 3 I L^� . .Cjl Q( -7 7 REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specific OC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require project Relinquished b Sampler: Date Time Received by: Receipt Temperature: ❑MA DEP Form specific OC.Project specific QC includes Sample Duplicates, j/ ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory QC is ( (�;'�y'L� *--1� Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific QC (`�� j�� r�'- _ �p ❑RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples, Relinquisher y: to Time Received by: Shipping/Airbill ICAA MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional ir— I _ Number: , All ✓ Reportable Concentrations sample aliquot. M Il RCGW-1 ❑RCS-1 Relinquished by: Date Time Recery b.L borato Cuslod Seal/ / Protect Specific to Required Selection of la Sample lu ry: Y � ❑RCGW-2 ❑RCS-2 p Sample Duplicate Cooler Serial P P ❑Selectee by laboratory �y /' ��^^^ ❑MA Dredge Disposal N''c-Y a Number: 0 Matrix Spike ❑Please use sample: ❑NH❑RI p CT p ME Method of Shipment:.L GWA Courier❑Express Mail ❑Federal press t� } Specify Category: 0 Matrix Spike Duplicate �[ UPS 0Hand Cl GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Quality Assurance/Quality Control F- A. Program Overview , Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include.a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GC/MS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing calibration standard. GC/MS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. B. Definitions Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time,up to but not exceeding 24 hours. Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound: s ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street; Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 f GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Matrix: Water Units: ug/L CAS Number Analyte ( Spiked Measured Recovery QC Limits _111-84-2 n-Nonane(C9) - 50 _2_7 54° 40- 140 % 629-59-4 n-Tetradecane(C14) 50 29_ 58% 40- 140 % 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(C19) 50 _34- _ 69% 40- 140 I 112-95-8 _-: n-Eicosane(C20)_ 50_ — _ 34 69% _ 40- 140 % 1 630-02-4 n-Octacosane(C28) 50 32 64% _ 40- 140 % QC Surrogate.Compounds Recovery QC Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 84 % 40- 140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene 76 % 40 140 % _ - — - - ... ------- Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 66 % _ - _ 40= 140 % i ortho-Terphenyl ! 77 % 40- 140 % — —-- -- ----- Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons, MA DEP(1998). ' Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. r 1 I Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER t ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: MA DEP EPH Method ' QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Matrix: Water EPH Ranges Concentration. - nits Reporting Limit ' n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t ; _ BRL- - _ ug/L �_- 500 i n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons -_ _ BRL __ ug/L _�_ 500 j n=C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons tom— BRL --_ j- ug/L - 160 Unadjusted n-CI1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons -BRL - _ ug-/L —I— 160 j QC Surrogate Compounds _ Recovery QC Limits — Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl _ 77 % 40- 140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene _ 67 % 40- 140 % I Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 63 % 40- 140 % ortho erphenyl 71 % 40- 140 % I Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine!aboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal.standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C1 i to n-C22.Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample r Category: EPA Method 8270C(Mod)- EPH PAHs by GC/MS-SIM QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L CAS Number Analyte I < Spiked Measured,:; Recovery'. L QC Limits j j 91-20-3 j Naphthalene 5.0 3.9 78% 40- 140 % j 83-32-9 Acenaphthene F 5.0 4.8 96% (— 40- 140 % 120-12-7 I Anthracene _ 5.0 5.4 C 108% i 40- 140% 129-00-0 j Pyrene 5.0 I 5.2 j 105% 40- 140% j 218-01-9 Chrysene j 5.0 j 5.0 j 100% j 40- 140% J QC Surrogate Compound Recovery QC:Limits j ortho-Terphenyl j 81 % ! 40- 140 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA;SW-846, Third Edition, Uodate III (1996). Analvte list as specified by the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hvdrocarbons. Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM) in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordance with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hvdrocarbons. Kepon Notauons: Hn caicutanons pertormea prior to rounamg. ,,uanry -onuol omits are aennea oy the metnoaoiogy, or aiternauveiy wsea upon the nistoncai average recovery plus or minus tnree stanaara aeviation units. q Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: EPA Method 8270C(Mod)- EPH PAHs by GC/MS-SIM QC Batch ID: EP-0973-F Matrix:, Aqueous ' I' CAS Number Analyte Concentration- Units Reporting limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene j BRL ug/L 0.5 1 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L f 0.5 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene �. BRL ug/L _� 0.5 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL ug/L + 0.5 86-73-7 Fluorene BRL ! ug/L j 0.5 85-01-8 ! Phenanthrene ? BRL j ug/L 0.5 120-12-7 Anthracene _ BRL ug/L 0.5 206 44-0_ Fluoranthene BRL — �_ ug/L 0.5 - 129-00-0 Pyrene — — BRL -- ug/L ; _0.5 56-55-3 _ Benzo[a]anthracene _ _ _BR_L_ ug/L 0.1 218-01-9 Chrysene _ _ BRL ; ug/L 0.1 _205-99-2 Benzo(b]fluoranthene BRL ;— ug/L 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo(k]fluoranthene — — _ -- BRL ug/L I 0.1 ' 5 0-3 2-8 —_— Benzo(a]pyrene i BRL j ug/L i 0.1 193-39-5 ! Indeno(1,213-c,d]pyrene _ BRL --_—�— ug/L L 0.1 53-70-3 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BRL 1 ug/L _ 0.1 191 24-2 Benzo h,i] a lene i BRL g/ QC Surrogate Compound_ — Recovery _ —� ` QC Limits ortho-Terphenyl 66 % I 40- 140 % Method Reference: Test.Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition. Update III (1996). Analvte list as specified by the target analvtes of the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hvdrocarbons. Method modified by use of selected ion monitoring(SIM) in accordance with Section 7.5.5 of the method. Method protocol modified to include acidification and the surrogate compound in accordanc with the MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hvdrocarbons. ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if anv, is below reporting limit for analvte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliablv quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adiusted for sample dilution and sample size. . F 1 ' a Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER r ANALYTICAL Certifications and Approvals ' CONNECTICUT, Department of Health Services, PH-0586 Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste,Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved 1 Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. C. MAINE, Department of Human Services, MA103 Drinking Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. ' Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analytes. D. MASSACHUSETTS, Department of Environmental Protection, M-MA-103 Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,Fluoride, Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity,Total Dissolved Solids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform,Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated Biphenyls(water),Polychlorinated Biphenyls(oil). E. MICHIGAN, Department of Environmental Quality Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 ' F. NEW HAMPSHIRE, Department of Environmental Services,.202798 Drinking Water Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium ' Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium, Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. RHODE ISLAND, Department of^Health, 54 - Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 RECEIVED )AN 2 �q 2002 GROUNDWATER Groundwater Analytical,Inc. P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL 228 Buz Main Street ' Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 January 25, 2002 1 Ms. Kara Risk Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 Lab ID: 47725 Sampled: 01-10-02 Dear Kara: ' Enclosed are the Volatile Organics Analyses performed for the above referenced project. This project was processed for Priority One Week turnaround. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, and a statement of our state certifications. ' I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. ' Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. ' Sincerely, Jonathan R. Sanford f President J RS/kh ' Enclosures F • 9 f 1 ' GROUNDWATER LYTICAL EPA Method 8021 B Aromatic Volatile Organics by GGPID Field ID: MW-1 Laboratory ID: 47725-01 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: VG2-2098-W Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Received: 01-18-02 Preservation: HCI/Cool Analyzed: 01-23-02 Matrix: Aqueous Dilution Factor: 1 j. CAS Number Analyte. Concentration :,,Units Reporting limit, _71-43-2 Benzene BRL ug/L F 1 108-88-3 Toluene BRL I ug/L 1 100-41-4 j Ethyl benzene __B_RL ug/L _ 1 108-38-3/106-42-3 Pd an meta-X lene ara-X lene _ _ Y Y I BRL � ug/L 95-47-6 ortho-Xylene BRL _ ug/L j 1 QC Surrogate Compound I Recovery QC Limits ., . a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene 112 % _ 70- 130 % j Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III (1996). ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8021 B Aromatic Volatile Organics by GGPID Field ID: MW-2 Laboratory ID:�, 47725-02 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch-ID: VG2-2098-W ' ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Received: 01-18-02 Preservation: HCI/Cool Analyzed: 01-23-02 ' Matrix: Aqueous Dilution Factor: 1 11, CAS,Number ; Analyte Concentration'`µ _ Units ,. Reporting Limit 71-43-2 Benzene I BRL ug/L 1 J 108-88-3 Toluene BRL ug/L 100-414 j Ethylbenzene BRL ug/L 1 108-38-3/106-42-3 meta-Xylene and para-Xylene , 'BRL ug/L 1 1 95-47-6 i ortho-Xylene BRL ug/L 1 j ' QC Surrogate Compound a Recovery QC Limits a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene 113 % 70- 130 % Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III(1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified:under routine laboratory,operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. 1 Groundwater Anal tical Inc. P.O. Box 1200 22 Min 8 a Street Buzzards Ba MA'02532" Y Y, GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8021 B t Aromatic Volatile Organics by GGPID Field ID: MW-3 Laboratory ID: 47725-03 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: VG2-2098-W Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-1.0-02 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Received: 01-18-02 Preservation: HCI/Cool Analyzed: 01-23-02 ' Matrix: Aqueous Dilution Factor: 1 GAS Number Analyte Concentration; w': Units_ ReportinLimit g 71-43-2 Benzene BRL ug/L 1 J ' 108-88-3 Toluene j BRL ug/L 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene _BRL I ug/L 108-38-3/10642-3 meta-Xylene and Para-Xylene _ BRL � ug/L- 1 ' 95-47-6 ortho-Xylene BRL ug/L ; 1 QC Surrogate Compound ' Recovery- QC Limits a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene _ 107% _ I_ 70- 130 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III(1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under.routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. g Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Maui Street, Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Y.. GROUNDWATER 1 ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8021 B ' Aromatic Volatile Organics by GGPID Field ID: MW-4 Laboratory lD 47725-04 z. Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch 1D: VG2-2098-W 1 Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inc. Sampled: 01-10-02 , Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Received: 01-18-02 Preservation: HCI/Cool Analyzed: 01-23-02 1 Matrix: Aqueous Dilution'Factor: -1 CAS Number Analyte " Concentration ,,: Units Reporting Limit _ , . 71-43-2 Benzene BRL ug/L 1 j 1 108-88-3 i Toluene 'BRL I ug/L I 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene BRL 1: ug/L 1 1108-38-3/106-42-3 Y P Y I ug/L 1 � meta-X lene and ara-X lene BRL j 95-47-6 I ortho-Xylene BRL ug/L 1 1 Surrogate Compound Recovery -',QC Limits { a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene 107 %_ — - __ 70- 130 / 1 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid;Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III (1996). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting Limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. f 1 1 . Groundwater Analytical,Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main StreetpBuzzards Bay,MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8021 B Aromatic Volatile Organics by GGPID . Field ID: MW-5 laboratory ID: 47725-05 Project: Birmingham/BO99-2533 QC Batch ID: VG2-2098-W ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly, Inca Sampled: 01-10-02 Container: 40 mL VOA Vial Received: 01-18-02 Preservation: HCI/Cool Analyzed: 01-23-02 ' Matrix: Aqueous Dilution Factor 1` CAS-Number Analyte Concentration Units Reporting Limit 71-43-2 Benzene BRL ug/L i 1 ' 108-88-3 i Toluene -- BRL ug/L 1 100-414 Ethylbenzene BRL -ug/L ___ 1__J 108-38-3/106-42-3 ; meta-Xylene and Para-Xylene 'j BRL 1` ug/L j 1 95-47-6 1 ortho-Xylene 4, BRL ug/L } 1 QC Surrogate Compound Recovery- QC'Limits a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene _ 1 107 °/° _ b" 70- 130 % ' Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III(1996) Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified,under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjustea.for sample dilution and sample size. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 - Lab ID: 47725 ' Client: Bennett &O'Reilly, Inc. Received: 01-18-02 A: Physical Condition of Sample(s) This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition. The sample(s) were received ' undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation` B. Project Documentation �. This project was accompanied, by satisfactory Chain of Custody documentation, with the following amendment(s) or correction(s): 1. Samples 47562-01 through =05 for analysis by EPA Method 8021 Aromatics were taken off hold and processed for Priority Turnaround due 01-25-02, per Dave Bennett, 01-18701 C. Analysis of Sample(s) No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were.noted b the laboratory durin the processing of these Y Y rY g p g sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay;MA 02532 aZ 228 Main Street,P.O.Box 1200 GROUNDWATER p�� Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD I ANALYTICAL Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER Np 057850 FAX(508)759-4475 Project Name: Firm: O ,�}' ^ TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST G(��1 ❑STANDARD(10 Business Days) Volaliles semivalaulea Pest/Herb Us PelroleemNve owman Han General chemistry other Pr❑ec!Num r: n y ) EA,elahle Val. metals A res Esl.TPH VaI.TPH Waste ti�i_ � /� �� PRIORITY(5 Business Days) _ e : s = e z i�� I (J ❑ RUSH(RAN- ) r- e Sa pler Nam (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) ❑ o p p - \n , (� City/State/Zip: '9 9 a 0 I)��1—Zj� -- 1 e. Please FAX YES pR NO g FAX Number: O i I�4{/�p'T o e z t'rolect Mana er: Tel hone: ° s BILLING s h a e m Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: s ❑ ' _ ENSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container p replicates). (except re licates o m m Sampling - - a e `a a = ° ❑ o Matrix- TypeContalner(s) Preservation Fill te �j. 0 0 o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 ❑a o _ o _ Sl _ ° E SAMAT - a B „ _ �iABORATO.RY'� s X b S _ - ❑ ❑ :? ` o - ❑ w ENTIFC ION _ o l ❑ r r F 5 3 a 5 a 5 a m (Lab Use Only) 8qy ❑ ., _ e o R n ' S P e �F'l/ $ $ a m s o a m % ¢ o ¢ ❑ E - ❑ ❑ ;� rl o❑❑❑ ❑ E m ❑ ' d E rt U m ❑ a a a a 0 ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ O ❑ ❑ FJ' 0 ❑ 0 00 u n a n n o 0� 3 . 5 i I REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specific OC p Safe Drinking Water Act - - NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. ❑MA DEP Form Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require ro'ect pq p Date Time Received by: e P 1 Reli ulshed b Sam ter: _ Receipt Temperature: specific Spikes, Project specific OC includes Sample Duplicates, N Q NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory OC is Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC I D /—��[O p RCRA/Haz-Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis:For water samples, Relinq ish y: to Time Received by: Shipping/Airbill A MCP(310.CMR 40) each MS.MSO and Sample Duplicate requires an additional _ Number:eponable Concentrations sample aliquot. /I Z US \� J 4 V vl Q�jA_J_XJCJ �'RCGW-1 ❑RCS•1 project Specific OC Required Selection of QC Sample Relinquished by: Date Time Recely b L boratory: Custody Seal/ ❑�RCG W-2 O RCS-2 p Sample Duplicate p MA Dredge Disposal C Selecleu by laboratory Cooler Serial _�Ali p Matrix Spike p Please use sam le: - v Number: 7F pNHpRI CTpME p 1S , Specify Captegory: O Matrix Spike Duplicate Method of Shipment: WA Courier p Express Mail p Fe eral press ❑UPS p Hand❑ GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Quality Assurance/Quality Control A: Program Overview Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high ' quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update LII (1996). ' Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. ' All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GUMS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing calibration standard. GUMS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation ' batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. B.. .Definitions. — ' Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of.reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. ' Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Percent Recoveries,for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main.Street,'Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 . GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: EPA Method 8021 B-Aromatics ' QC Batch ID: VG2-2098-W Matrix: Aqueous . Units: ug/L CAS'-Number-'_ Analytee Spiked Measured ., Reco`very QC'Limits •;I f 71-43-2 Benzene 5 5 99 % 70-130 % j 108-88-3 Toluene 5 5 93 % 70- 130 % 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 5 5 96% 70- 130 QC Surrogate Compound- Recovery QC'Limits a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene 114 % ; 70- 130 % ' Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA;SW-846,Third Edition, Update III(1996).' Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. r • Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O.,Box 1200, 228 Main Street,Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: EPA Method 8021.13-Aromatics QC Batch ID: VG2-2098-W Matrix: Aqueous CAS'Number~ Analyte Concentration Units Reporting Limit 1634-04-4 j Methyl tert-butyl Ether(MTBE) BRL �'_ ug/L j 5 j 71-43-2 I Benzene BRL j_ ug/L j 1 j 108-88-3 ( Toluene j BRL T ug/L T _j 108-90-7 j Chlorobenzene j " BRL _ : ug/L 1 j i 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene I BRL j ug/L 108-38-3/106-42-3 meta-Xylene and para-Xylene BRL �, .; ug/L 1 95-47-6 ortho-Xylene I BRL -- .1 ug/L ' 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL_ j ug/L 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 . BRL j ug/L 95-50-1 _ 1,2-Dichlorobenzene i _ _ BRL _—j g/ QC Surrogate Compound, Recovery QC Limits.,' a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene 90 % 70 21130 Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA,SW-846, Third Edition, Update 111(1996). Analyte list as formerly specified by EPA Method 8020A,and the additional analyte of MTBE. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentraiion,.if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. ' Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. 0 Indicates additional target analyte. S Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER i ANALYTICAL Certifications and Approvals F_ CONNECTICUT, Department of Health Services, PH-0586 Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste,Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. C. MAINE, Department of Human Services, MA103 Drinking Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analyzes. ' Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analyzes. D. MASSACHUSETTS, Department of Environmental Protection, M-MA-103 Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper.Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,Fluoride, Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity,Total Dissolved Solids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic. Compounds, 1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform,Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, ' Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine.Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated' Biphenyl,Iwaterl,Polychlorinated Biphenyl,foil,. E. MICHIGAN, Department of Environmental Quality,. Drinking Water -_ -- -- 1 Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2; 1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo=3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 F. NEW HAMPSHIRE, Department of Environmental Services, 202798 Drinking Water Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium ' Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium, R . ' Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N;,Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. RHODE ISLAND, Department,of Health, 54 ' Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage h Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic r ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX F I 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BENNETT A RE I L LY Inc. 1 _ Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main.Street Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line PO Box 1667 Site Development r Brewster, MA 02631 p Hyd ogeologic Survey Subdivision Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 ' Water Supply Licensed Site Professional . .Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax rQUALITY ASSURANCE & QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM Quality Assurance& Quality Control'Program ' For Soil and Groundwater Sampling INTRODUCTION The Quality Assurance & Quality Control (QA/QC) -Program outlines the purpose, policies, g P rP , P , organization and operations to support sampling work conducted by BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.. The procedures and protocal represented herein are consistent with the MA DEP "Standard References for Monitor Wells" [WSC-310-91], and the recommendations of a MA certified laboratory. Implementation of this program will help to ensure,the validity of data used to provide professional engineering and environmental opinions to clients. k. The following definitions are used in the,QA/QC Program: Quality Assurance refers to the concepts Q ty used In defining asystem for verifying and maintaining a desired level of quality in a product or process. Quality Control is a specific,step-by-step description of how the Quality Assurance Program will be carried out. This QA/QC Program guides field sampling activities. Project specific QA/QC Programs are adopted when warranted. Modifications to the QA/QC Program may be made only after specific ' approval by the QA/QC Officer(Project Manager). r. I ' The specific objectives of the QA%QC Program are to: 1. specify the level of quality of each field procedure used in collecting samples; 2. identifydeficiencies in field procedures which might affect t _ , p g he quality of data; and 3. require sufficient documentation to verify the credibility of the sampling methods employed. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY The Project Manager of BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., is responsible' for the quality of work produced. The Project Manger directs the QA/QC Program to document the control of field efforts and resulting data. " ' In this capacity, the Project Manager is expected to do the following: ' 1. prepare detailed QC Plans;_ 2. obtain analytical and sampling procedures reference materials;, 3. ensure that all field test and measurement equipment is maintained and calibrated properly; 4. monitor quality assurance activities to ensure conformance with authorized'policies, procedures, and sound practices, and recommend improvements as necessary, 5. ensure that all field sampling is conducted in accordance with guidelines contained herein, 6. oversee all field sampling efforts to detect conditions which might directly or ' indirectly jeopardize the utility of,resulting analytical data, such as improper, calibration of equipment or cross-contamination through improper.:storage. of- samples; 7. ensure that sample handling procedures.are adequate for the sample types received; ' 8. inspect the quality of purchased sampling materials. z 2 a I ' SAMPLE MANAGEMENT COLLECTION AND PREPA RATION, ' Introduction Sample management and stringent documentation are essential for successful quality assurance. The procedures in this section are designed to ensure collection of samples which truly represent the matrix being sampled by eliminating trace levels of contaminants from external sources. ' Sample Management The management of samples, up to the point of delivery to the laboratory for analysis, is under the ' supervision of the Project Manager,who shall ensure that samples are collected,labeled,preserved, stored, and transported according to the prescribed methods. If.significant deviations from the ' sampling protocol occur, resulting in a suspected compromise of the sample integrity, all samples collected during the sampling effort prior to correction of the procedure will'be discarded and fresh samples collected. ' Sample Collection p - i ' Groundwater Monitoring wells will be sampled in accordance with the following sampling procedures:. 1. Identify the well and record the well number on the groundwater sampling record an an Monitoring Well Sampling Log (attached). ' 2. Open the well cap and measure total organic volatile (TOV) concentrations at the wellhead with the use of a portable photoionization detector: Record levels detected. ' 3. Measure groundwater level to the nearest 0.01 foot from the top of the well casing ` using a water level indicator. Record water level on a Monitoring Well Sampling ' Log (attached). Water level indicators will be decontaminated between wells. 4. The volume of standing water in the well casing will be calculated and recorded on ' the Monitoring Well Sampling Log. At least three well volumes will be purged either by pump or disposable bailer. Newly installed monitoring'wells will be developed by purging at least ten volumes. Purging of wells will be complete when ' either dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity or.temperature has stabilized relative to previous sampling rounds. Once the purging is complete,wells will be screened for each of the above parameters and recorded on the Sampling Log . 5. Sam les,will be collected using either a disposable bailers or um Samples will p g P pump. P : be transferred into appropriately sterilized/preserved containers, taking care to, ' minimize agitation of the sample [Refer to attached "Recommended Sample Containers..." Groundwater Analytical]. 3 n i 6. Sample containers will be ro erl 'labeled with tags provided b the laboratory.P P P Y g P Y Samples will be logged in on a chain-of-custody form ' 7. le Samp s taken for precipitate metal analysis will be acidified to a pH of less than 2.0 in the field. When sampling water for volatile compounds, care must be exercised to prevent loss of compound through evaporation, and to control susceptibility to outside contamination. ' Precautionary measures include: 1. avoiding engine exhaust,gasoline containers,degreasing solvents,solvent-laden rags ' and non-compatible decontamination agents; ' 2. sampling bottles will only be opened at the time of sampling and quickly closed after collecting the sample,preventing aeration of the-sample with the atmosphere or any other gas; 3. slowly filling bottles to ca acity with sam am ple and securing cap.without entraining air bubbles; 4. inverting the bottle while tapping lightly to check for air bubbles; ' 5. adding additional sample to eliminate air bubbles if present,repeating steps 3 and 4; 6. placing samples on ice (approximately 4°C) immediately after collection in a dark, dry location; 7. segregating samples with a secondary barrier such as zip-lock bags, etc.; and 8. analyzing sample as soon as possible within the specific holding times after collection. Pump tubing will be decontaminated as follows: ' 1. Pumpnon-phosphate deter ent solution through system. for two minutes. g g Y ' 2. Pump clean hot tap water through system for two minutes or until clear, whichever is longer. ' 3. Pump analyte-free water through system,for two minutes. 4. Seal tubing ends;wrap and label with date of cleaning., 4 .; j Soils When collecting and screening soil samples, the procedures to be used are: 1. Prior to sampling surficial locations surface vegetation,rocks leaves and debris will p g g � , be cleared from the sample point to allow collection of a clean soil sample. If ' surficial soil samples are to be collected,a hand trowel or shovel and spatula will be used. The sampling equipment will be decontaminated as outlined below. 2. Boring samples will be collected via drilling rig-operated split spoon procedures. Soil samples collected from excavations or test pits will be collected directly with an ' auger (if necessary) from grade to approximately four feet below grade. Samples collected at deeper depths will be obtained directly from-the bucket of the backhoe. A stainless steel spatula will be used to remove soil from the backhoe bucket for ' placement in the appropriate sample containers,, µ 3. Soil samples collected for TOV screening will be placed in glass soil jars with ' aluminum foil placed.under the screw cap. Samples will be allowed to warm to ambient temperature before screening or will be screened in a heated vehicle after warming. The jar will be shaken for fifteen seconds prior to warming and after ' warming to ensure proper headspace development. Total organic vapors will be measured via a portable photoionization detector (PID) and their concentration recorded either on a Geological Borehole Log or field log. ' 4. Soil samples will be stored and shipped in appropriate sealed containers. P PP 5. Sample containers will be marked to indicate sampling date, time, location, and depth. Samples will be logged in on chain-of-custody forms (copy,attached). 1 6. The stratigraphy,of each soil boring and test pit excavation, and the construction of each monitoring well will be recorded by the on-site geologist on the appropriate Geologic Borehole Log or test pit field log (copies attached). When sampling soils for volatile compounds, care must be exercised.to prevent loss of compound ' and to control susceptibility to outside contamination. Precautionary measures include: 1. avoiding engine exhaust,gasoline containers,degreasing solvents,solvent-laden rags ' and non-compatible decontamination agents; 2. opening sampling bottles only at the time of sampling and quickly closing after 1 collecting the sample; F. 3. placing samples on ice(approximately 4° Q immediately after collection in a dark, dry location; 1 5 i 4. segregating samples with a secondary barrier such as zip-lock bags, etc.; and ' 5. analyzing sample as soon as possible ,within- the specific holding times after collection. ' Soil sampling equipment (shovel, auger, etc.) will be decontaminated-between each sampling location with a potable water rinse, alconox soap wash, and a final potable water rinse. ' Drilling and excavating apparatus (augers, rods, casing, core barrels, backhoe bucket, and other equipment coming in contact with the borehole or excavation)will be decontaminated between each boring and excavation via steam cleaning. If necessary, an alconox soap wash followed by a steam ' cleaning will be included. ' Sample Preservation ` To prevent or retard the degiadation/modification of chemicals in samples during transit and storage, ' the samples will be refrigerated at or below 4° C in appropriately preserved containers. Samples will be delivered to the laboratory by courier or by overnight delivery service. ' DATA MANAGEMENT Logging of Samples The accountability of a sample begins when the sample is taken from its'natural environment. " Sample handling (chain-of-custody)-;records must be completed at the time of sampling. The following chain-of-custody procedure must be implemented by the Field Team Leader to assure sample integrity. ' l. The samples are under custody of the Field Team Leader if. ' a. they are in his (or her) possession; b. they are in view after being in possession: c. they are locked up or sealed securely to prevent tampering; or, ' d. they are in a. designated secure area 2. The"original",of the sample handling form must accompany the samples at all times ' after collection. A copy of the sample handling form is "kept by the Field Team Leader. ' 3. When samples are transferred in possession, the individuals relinquishing and receiving will sign, date, and note the time on the form.& f w h t The Sampling Handling Record will contain information to distinguish each sample from any ' other sample. This information will include: 1. the project forwhich sampling is being conducted; 2. the matrix being samples.(air, groundwater, soil, etc.); 4 ' 3. the sampling date and time; 4. field sample identification number and chain-of-custody identification number; 5. the number and type of containers and the type of preservative used (if any); and, ' 6. signature of the person performing the sampling. ' Each sample will be assigned a unique identification number, which.will be marked on the sample ' container. The sample handling record will be forwarded to the laboratory with the samples. As a precaution against this record being lost or altered, the sampling personnel will retain a copy of the sampling handling record documenting all information up until the first change of sample custody. This record will be filed by the Project Manager. ' Sample Identification Numbers Reporting of date to the data ,,management system will require the assignment of a unique ' identification number to each sample collected (including quality control samples). A record will be maintained by the Project Manager to associate the field sample with the various identification ' numbers used to analyze the field sample. 'Specific sample identification procedures are developed for each field sampling effort by the Project Manager.` • . •. a ., . ' 7 r I r ' FORM SAMPLES r < f BENNETT & O'REILLY Inc. 1573 Main sweet, P.O. Box 1667 Brewster,MA 02631 Engineering and Environmental Services (sos) 89676630 H+ MONFOR WELL SAMPLING, LOG I CLIENT DATE(S) LOCATION JOB# ' MEASURING POINT' SAMPLER GROUNDSURFACE OR T.O.C. Well Elev. of Total Depth to Standing Water Static Volume HNU CommentsNumber reference Depth of Water Water Table Volume Purged PI-101 point Well (Feet) Height Elevation (gallons) (gallons) (ppm) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet), ' NOTES: t 1573 Main Street, P.O. Box 1667 1 BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. Brewster MA o2631 Engineering and Environmental Services (508).896-6630 MONFFOR WELL SAMPLING LOG' ' RESPIRATION ANALYSIS CLIENT DATE(S) ' LOCATION x JOB # SAMPLER NF Well Total Approx. Standing Length of HNU Mcrhane Oxv2en Carbon CommeZtS: Number Depth of Depth to Water screen PI-lol (%CH,) (%O_, Dioxide Well Water Height above (ppm) (- Co„ (feet) (feet) (feet) SWL ' NOTES: 1 S ry BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. Sheet of 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 ' PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster, MA 02631 Job Number: Date: Time: Test Hole Number: ' Job Name: Witness: Casing I. D.: Ground Elevation: Reference Elevation (TOC): Falling Head 0 Rising Head ❑ ' Aquifer Saturation Thickness(If Confined): Depth of Boring (A): Well Screen Length (L): Length of Test Section(L): Depth of Groundwater Table (H): Depth of Top of Test Section (B): Type of Material in Test Zone: Notes: d 2r TIME ELAPSED WATER ACTIVE (sec.) TIME (sec.) h/Ho DEPTH(x) HEAD(h) X H77 B ; STATIC 1 Au T r L N --� 2R !— . h= -H X(falling head) or ' h =X-H (rising head) n Ho=H-Xo (falling head) or Ho=Xo H (rising head) Xo=X at t=0 ' A, B, H&L are defined above. Job Nam b: Job Number: Date: Location: Weather: Witness: Start Date: Pump & I-low Rate Location: TOC: Location: n: NOTES: Time Time Depth to Water Static Water Lv. Draw Down Depth to Water Static Water Lv. Draw Dawn Depth to Water Static Water Lv. Draw Down pH /Cond.fremp. (sec). 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 30 (sec.) 45 (min) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 190 280 3TO- 460 550 640 730 820 910 BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. Sheet of 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 r 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster, MA 02631 Sieve Analysis Data and Computation Sheet Job Number: Date: Job Name: Sample Number: ' Sample Collected By: Sample Tested By: # Notes SIEVE WEIGHT PERCENT CUMULATIVE PROJECT OPENING SIEVE RETAINED RETAINED PERCENT MANUAL ' MILLI- MESH IN GRAMS (Cumulative) FINER.., SPECIFICATION METERS (Cumulative) y • PASSED MESH SIEVE TOTAL Sample Weight Wet: Sample Weight Dry: ' Percent Moisture: Sample Weight Passed Through Sieves: .. . 5. ' • 9, T BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inca Sheet of 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster, MA 02631 Job Number: Date: Job Name: SAND GRAVEL SILT SAND Test Hole Number. � � Witness: E] Drilling Contractor: PEAT CLAY Sampling Method: GEOLOGIC BOREHOLE LOG Type Blows per %of Well Litho lo /Sediment Lithology Depth,,. Of Depth Specification&Remarks Description 1 Sample Drive Recovery PID Response 5— (ppm), 10 15 r 20 25 SWL: 30 35 . ' 45 ' S0 BENNETT & 01REILLY Inc. REPORT NUMBER: 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 .508-896-4687 Fax Brewster, MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: Date: Job Name: Feature: Contractor. Type of Work: + Weather Conditions: Temperature: Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) ' Equipment in use or idled(identify which) A ' Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed - ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously report ed'deficiencies Summary of construction activities 1 = 1 4 r 228 Main Street,P.O.Box 1200 GROUNDWATER Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ANALYTICAL Telephone(508)759-444t AND WORK ORDER NO— 049825 FAX(508)759-4475 Project Name: Firm: TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST Valallles Semlvelalllea PeslRlerh/PLOs Metals Petrolavm ❑ STANDARD(10 Business Days) dreearhon Hal. Geoaral thamlelry Other Fdnclahle o. el. W.A. Project Number: Address: ❑ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) — ❑ RUSH(RAN- ) y (Rush requires Rush Authorizalion Number) ❑ n ❑ n ; ❑ Sampler Name: City/State/Zip: Please FAX ❑ YES ❑ NO it FAX Number: e r ry o Project Manager: Telephone: BILLING o o In n o 810 Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: o a INSTRUCTIONS:Use separate line for each container(except replicates). `s o s a ❑ 5 Sampling Matrix Type Contalner(s) 0 0 3 0 s 0 0 0 $ 0 a 9 0 < ❑ - a ❑ D ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n n n ❑ o n o _ ❑ o P 9 Preservation Fumrea _ — � 2 ; s ❑ S O SAMPLE g $ a LABORATORY J G 8 g _ a �g $ 8 ❑ 0 3 ❑ ❑ A IDENTIFICATION x i L o f y 8 e xy 4 a NUMBER W a w w 5 a a s se a E m (Lab Use Only) >L g e 3 n r ❑ ❑ e" 3 s 1a o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n n o n o o ❑ n ❑ ❑ ❑ IS ❑ D ❑ ❑ n ❑ ❑ o ❑ o ❑ ❑ o z v — I L T] REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD . - Regulatory Program Project Specific OC : NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse,hereot. ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require project Relinquished by Sampler. Date Time Received b Recei t Tem erature: - - ❑MA DEP Form specific OC.Project specific OC includes Sample Duplicates. Y p P - ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates:Laboratory QC is Specify Stale:. not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC ,� o ❑RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples. Relinquished'by: Dale Time Received by: Shipping/Airbill - _. ❑MA MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional - Number: Reportable Concentrations sample aliquot. - _ - - ❑RCGW-I.❑RCS-t protect Speclrlc OC Required - Selection of�C'Sample Relinquished by: Data Time Received by Laboratory: Custody Seal/ ❑RCGW-2❑RCS-2 ❑Sample Duplicate _ ❑Selected by laboratory _ _ Cooler Serial' ❑ Dredge Disposal Number: ❑NH❑RI❑CT❑ME ❑ ❑ ❑Matrix Spike 0 Please use sample: NH Method of Shipment: GWA Courier Express Mail ❑Federal Express Specify Category: 113 Matrix Spike Duplicate 0 UPS [J Hand ❑ ENVIROTDCH LABORATORIES, INC.' 449 ROUTE 130 SANDWICH, NA 02563 PfME: (508)888-6460 FAX: . (508)888-6446 ' WATER ANALYSIS REQUISITION: , DATE: DATE REC.'D: SAMPLE NO. TIME: NO. COPIES NAME: RUSH-24HR. TURNAROUND (ex.chg.) MAIL: — ' PHONE: FAX: 'WATER LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: PAYMENT/AMT. REC'D. : SAMPLED BY: ' BILL TO/AMT. : WELL SPECS. : . ANALYSIS REQUEST: WATER SAMPLE TYPE: COLIFORM BACTERIA * � _FHA-HUD/VA �H * NEW WELL CONDUCTANCE * EXISTING WELL ' SODIUM * _TOWN WATER _NITRATE-N * _FILTER/CONDITIONER IRON * MISCELLANEOUS ' MANGANESE S _POOL SPA CHOLORINE _SULFATE _POTASSIUM _COLIFORM BACTERIA ' ALKALINITY _PSEUDOMONAS _CHLORIDE _STANDARD PLATE COUNT _TURBIDITY ' _COLOR COPPER OTHER ANALYSIS REQUESTED: _LEAD ' ODOR FECAL COLIFORM. _AMMONIA-N _VOLATILE' ORGANICS _SULFIDE METHODS _MAGNESIUM _METALS CALCIUM METHOD:," * INDICATES PARAMETERS FOR A POTABLE WATER TEST. ' INSTRUCTIONS: BACTERIA SAMPLE - Obtain sterile sample bottle. Remove strainer/airator ' from faucet. Turn on cold water. Allow it to run (5) five minutes. Fill container. Do not touch the inside of the bottle or the cap with anything. - ' POTABLE WATER SAMPLE - Follow instructions above..(Bottle size - 500ml) LEAD - Call lab for instructions. VOLATILE ORGANICS/ME'TALS - Call lab for instructions.' ; . ENV:IIZO'I':f{,CI 'I'M Rlo, 130 • Sandwich, NIA O2,(i1 (fOti) 13811 (i•1(iO I-Imo.:I:If) (1.1(io FROM: BENNETT & O ' RI'ILLY ) INC . VAX (w)[I) (Hill S-1G'/ (508 ) 896-6630 CIIAIrJ Of CIIS1(li)Y Ilr(*Onl) Ftol Iln• Ptoltcl N►+1N 11 'u t: ' ql ql V1 1 1 ti Analysis ys i s Re vues Led rlelcl E I'Y1ie c11' t, tic). Dill Tknt 19 Sl.Pbn (.oullon -' --- -- -- — — (Itcelrtd 1 /.f•r•••n r) --- Ilcll luiilu t{ y: l.S.r .n•.c) -- — Iltln Slnr• Iltttitr.l Iry; lS:ru�wrl n.{►t,q.,Id..a Ly: rS `t1...) O.1• T1m. Y - � -- Ilrlin 1 rl�l: I by: IS•�••n..cl'---- —fl.l• ilin. Iltui.trl by: /Srr•+�wrl 11411 rqultlNJ by; /Sy.+1�+1 136ke Time I1.caI+tJ 6y: (S%.r•+iur.l ntlin.gr{►1.«!by: n:y.vt.•+vl hat. Tlmr Ilr.caivcr) lot (-.Lor.lory hy: Ilrn..rtit 1 1 1 1 1 ' TECHNICAL REFERENCE MR. . , L41 JIFTM • ' Volatile Organic Analyses 9 yes Category Minimum Recommended Required Holding ' 9 rY Methods Cty.1 Container(s)2 Preservation Timed Aqueous Samples Volatile Organics 601/8010, 40 mL •.• 3 x 40 mL Glass Cool to 4°C3 14 Days 602/8020 Vials w/teflon HCI to pH<21 ' 624/8260 septum caps12 Remove Chlorine' 502.2 524.2 Acrolein and Acrylonitrile 603/8030 40 mL 3 x 40 mL Glass' Cool to 4°C3 14 Days Vials w/teflon Check pH;Adjust 4-51 septum caps"_ Remove Chlorine' Solid Samples Volatile Organics 8010/8020 log 1'x 125 mL Glass Cool to 41C3 14 Days ' 8260 Vial w/teflon septum cap1z OR 2 x 40 mL Glass Vials w/teflon septum caps 12.13 Acrolein and Acrylonitrile 8030 log . 1 x 125 mL Glass" Cool to 41C3 14 Days Vial w/teflon septum cap'2 / OR 2 x 40 mL Glass Vials w/teflon septum caps ' Se-rtivolatile Organic Analyses Minimum Recommended Required Holding ' Category Methods . City., Container(s)2 Preservation Timed Aqueous Samples Semivolatile Organics 625/8270 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 4°C3 7 Days' Glass Bottle Remove Chlorine' wlteflon liner" Semivolatile Organics 8270 2 L 3 x 1 L Amber Cool to 4°C3 7 Days' (Low-level,both Acid Modified Glass Bottle , Remove Chlorine' and Base/Neutral fractions) w/teflon liner" Semivolatile Organics 8270 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 4°C3' (Low-level,only one fraction Modified Glass Bottle Remove;Chlorine' 7 Days' Acid or Base/Neutral) wlteflon liner" Semivolatile Organics 525.2 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 4°C3 7 Days" ' (Drinking Water) Glass Bottle HCI to pH<2' w/teflon liner" Add Sodium Sulfite24 2,3,7,8-TCDD(Dioxin) 1613 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 4°C3 •7 Days' (Drinking Water) Glass Bottle w/teflon liner" ' Polynuclear 610/8100 1 L 2 xl L Amber Cool to 41C3 7 Days' Aromatic 8270 Glass Bottle Remove Chlorine' Hydrocarbons w/teflon liner" SSolid Samples ' Semivolatile 8270 30 g Glass Jar ' Cool to 41C3 14 Days10 Organics w/teflon liner" - Polynuclear 8100 30 g Glass Jar Cool to 40C3 14 Days10 Aromatic 8270 w/teflon liner" Hydrocarbons . k _ GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL 27 ' Pesticide and Herbicide Analyses Minimum Recommended Required Holding Category Methods Cty., Container(s)l Preservation Time8 ' Aqueous Samples Carbamate Pesticides 531.1 60ml- 2 x.125 Glass Bottle Cool to 4'C3 28 Days (Drinking Water) w/teflon liner" Add Sodium Thiosulfate2l Adjust pH to 3 with Monochloroacetic Acid Buffer Organochlorine 608/8080 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 40C3 7 Days' Pesticides& PCBs Glass Bottle Check pH;Adjust 5-96 w/teflon liner" Remove Chlorine'. ' Organochlorine Pesticides 508 1 L 2 x I L Amber Cool to 41C3 7 Days21 & PCBs Glass Bottle Add Sodium Thiosulfate2,6. (Drinking Water) w/teflon liner'. Polychlorinated Biphenyls 508A 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 41C3 14 Days 22 ' by Perchlorination Glass Bottle (Drinking Water) w/teflon liner' Organohalide Pesticides 505 40 mL 3 x 40 mL Glass Vials Cool to 41C3 7 Days" & PCBs witeflon septa caps!? Add Sodium Thiosulfate2= ' (Drinking Water) OrganopInosphorus 614/8140 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 41C', 7 Days Pesticides 4 Glass Bottle Check pH;Adjust 6-86 w/teflon liner 17 Remove Chlorine ' Chlorinated 615/8150 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 41C3 , 7 Days' Herbicides Glass Bottle Remove Chlorine w/teflon liner" Chlorinated Herbicides 515.1 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 41C3 14 Days 23 (Drinking Water) Glass Bottle Add Sodium w/teflon liner 17 Thiosulfateze Glyphosate 547 40 mL 2 x 40 mL Glass Cool to 41C3 14 Days (Drinking Water) Vial w/teflon liner Add Sodium ' R Thiosulfate26 Endothall 548.1 100 mL 2 x 125 mL Glass Cool to 41C3 7 Days 21 (Drinking Water) Bottle w/teflon liner", HC.I to pH<24 Add Sodium Thiosulfate26 ' Diquat and Paraquat 549.1 250 mL 1 x 1LAmber Cool to,41C3, 7 Days27 (Drinking Water) Glass Bottle H2S0,to pH<24 w/teflon liner17 Add Sodium Thiosulfate26 EDB and DBCP 504.1 40 mL 3 x 40 mL Glass Cool to 4'C3 14 Days ' (Drinking Water) Vials w/teflon Add Sodium Thiosulfate26 septa caps 12.17 EDB and DBCP 8011 40 mL ; 3 x 40 mL Glass Cool to 4'C3 14 Days ' Vials w/teflon HCI to pH<24 septa caps 12.17 Remove Chlorine? Solid Samples Organochlorine 8080 30 g Glass Jar Cool to 41C3 14 DaystO Pesticides&PCBs w/teflon liner 17 ' Organophosphorus 8140 30 g Glass Jar Cool to 4'C' 14 Days1' Pesticides w/teflon liner 17 Herbicides 8150 30 g Glass Jar . Cool to 47C3. 14 Days10 ' w/teflon liner17 EDB and DBCP 8260 log t x 125 mL Glass Cool to 40C3 14 Days Vial w/teflon septa cap 12.17 ' OR 2 k 40 mL Glass Vials w/teflon septa caps 12.13,17 ' 28 ' Hydrocarbon Analyses Minimum Recommended Required Holding ' Cagegory Methods aty.' Container(s)2 Preservation 7mee Aqueous Samples Hydrocarbon D3328-78 1 L 2 x 1LAmber Cool to 4°C3. 7 Days' Fingerprint Gass Bottle ' HZSO,to pH<2 ' (GC/FID) w/teflon liners' Total Petroleum 418.1 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 41C' 28 Days Hydrocarbons Glass Bottle HZSO,to pH<2 (TPH-IR) witeflon liner ' - Oil and Grease 413.1 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 4°C3 28 Days 413.2 Class Bottle HzSO,to pH.<2 witeflon liner Gasoline Range 8015/API 40 mL 3 x 40 mL Glass Cool to 4°C3 14 Days Organics Vials w/teflon HCI to pH<24 septa capstz Diesel Range 8100/API 1 L 2.x 1 L Amber Cool to 4°C3 7 Days' Organics Glass Bottle H2SO,to pH <2 r' witeflon line MA DER Volatile 8015/MA DER 40mL 3 x 40 mL Glass Cool to 4'C3 14 Days Petroleum Hydro- Vials w/teflon HCI or H,SO to pH<21 carbons(VPH) septa caps12 ' MA DER Extractable 8100/MA DER 2 L 3 x 1 LAmber Cool to 41C' 14 Days Petroleum Hydrocarbons(EPH) 8270 Mod Glass Bottle HzSO,or HCl to pH<21 with low-level PAHs.(GC/MS-SIM) w/teflon liner17 Solid Samples Hydrocarbon D3328-78 30 g Glass Jar Cool to 4°C3 14 Days10 ' Fingerprint Modified w/teflon liners' (GC/FID) Total Petroleum 418.1 30 g Glass Jar Cool to 4°C3 14 DaysiO ' Hydrocarbons Modified w/teflon liner (TPH-IR) Oil and Grease 413.1 30 g , Glass Jar 'Cool to 4°C' 14 Days10 413.2 w/teflon liner ° Modified ' Gasoline Range 8015/API log 1 x 125 mL Glass Cool to 4°C' 1 k. 14 Days Organics Vial witeflon septa cap z ' Diesel Range 8100/API 30 g Glass Jar Cool to 4°C3 14 DaysiO Organics witeflon liner' MA DER Volatile Petroleum 8015/MA DER 50g ' 1 x 125 mL Glass w/50mL Cool to 41C3. 14 Days ' Hydrocarbons(VPH) Methanol and Glass Jar without Methanol. MA DER Extractable 8100/MA DER 30g - Glass Jar ^ Cool to 4°C3 14 bays ' Petroleum Hydrocarbons(EPH) w/teflon liner" Metals Analyses Minimum Recommended.:,. Required - Holding Category Methods Qty.,., Container(s)z Preservation T'imea Aqueous Samples Total Metals 200s '100 mL Plastic Bottle HNO3 to pH<2 180 Days ' . (except Mercury) 6010 - Cool to 4°C3 7000s Dissolved Metals 200s 100 mL Plastic Bottle Filter First" 180 Days (except Mercury) 6010 HNO3 to pH<2 7000s Cool to 4°C3.. Total Mercury 245.1 100 mL Plastic Bottle HNO3to pH<2 28 Days 7470 Cool to 4°C3 ' GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL 29 • • • ' Metals Analyses Minimum Recommended Required Holding Category Methods Qty., Container(s)2 Preservation Time' ' Dissolved Mercury 245.1 100 mL Plastic Bottle Filter First" 28 Days 7470 HNO3 to pH<2 Cool to 4°C3 SDWA Lead and 200.9 1 L 1 x 1 L Plastic Cool to 4°C3' 180 Days Copper Rule 200.7 Bottle Chromium, 218.1-5 200 mL Plastic Bottle Cool to 4°C3 24 Hours Hexavalent Solid Samples ' Total Metals 6010 2 g Glass Jar Cool to 4�C3 180 Days (except Mercury) 7000s w/teflon liner Total Mercury 245.5 0.6 g Glass Jar Cool to 4°C3 28 Days 7471 w/teflon liner '. Hazardous Waste Characterization Analyses Minimum Recommended Required Holding Category Methods Qty., Container(s)2 Preservation Time' ' Solid Samples" TCLP Volatile 1311 1509 2 x 125 mL Glass Cool-to 4°C3 14 Days" Organics 8260 -Vial w/teflon septum cap12 ' TCLP Metals. 1311 300 g Glass'Jar Cool to 4°C3 28 Daysi9 Semivolatiles. 6010 w/teflon liner 14 Days" and 7000s Herbicides 8080 ' 8150 8270 Ignitability 1010 100g Plastic or Glass Cool to 4.°C3 None Modified Jar Corrosivity 9045 20 g Plastic or Glass Jar Cool to 4°.C2. None Reactivity SW-846 20 g Plastic or Glas Jar" Cool to 4°C3 None Paint Filter 9095 100 g Plastic or Glass Jar None None Conventional Physical Properties Analyses Minimum Recommended Required Holding Category Methods Qty.' Container(s)2 Preservation Time' Aqueous Samples ' Color 110.1-3 50 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C' 48 Hours Conductance 120.1 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 41C3 28 Days Hardness 130.1-2 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Adjust pH<2i5 180 Days Cool to 41C3 Odor 140.1: 200 mL Glass Bottle Only Cool to 41C3 24 Hours pH 150.1 25 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle None Analyze Immediately ' Solids,Total 160.1 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 41C3 7 Days Dissolved(TDS) Solids,Total 160.2 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 7 Days Suspended(TSS) Solids,Total Solids,Total TS 160.4 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 41C3 ' 7 Days ( ) 160.3 100 mL Plastic Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 7 Days Volatile(TVS) Solids,Settleable 160.5 1 L Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 48 Hours ' (SS) Turbidity 180.1 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 48 Hours 30 10 Rik ' Conventional Inorganic Analyses Minimum Recommended Required' Holding Category Methods Qty.' Container(s)2 Preservation Time' Aqueous Samples Acidity 305.1 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 14 Days Alkalinity 310.1 2 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 14 Days ' Bromide 320.1 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle None 28 Days Chloride 325.1-3 50 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle None 28 Days Chlorine, 330.1-5 200 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle None' Analyze_ Total Residual Immediately Remove Sulfide Cyanides 335.1-3 500 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle '° 14 Days NaOH to pH>12 Cool to 4°C3 ' Fluoride 340.1-3 300 mL Plastic Bottle Only None 28 Days Iodide 345.1 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 24 Hours Nitrogen,Ammonia 350.1-3 400 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle H2SO,to pH<2 28 Days Cool to 4°C3 ' Nitrogen, 351.1-4 500 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle H"SO,to pH<2 s 28 Day Total Kjeldahl Cool to 4°C3 Nitrogen, 353.1-3 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle H Z s SO,to pH<2 28 Da Nitrate plus Nitrite Cool to 4°C3 y ' Nitrogen. 353.2-3 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 48 Hours Nitrate(Wastewater) Nitrogen,Nitrate 353.2-3 100 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 28 Days ' (Chlorinated Drinking Water) Nitrogen, Nitrate 353.2-3 100 mL. Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 14 Days (Non-Chlorinated Drinking Water) H,SO to pH<2' Nitrogen, 353.2-3 50 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 48 Hours Nitrite Minimum Recommended Required Holdin Category Methods Qty.1, Container(s)z Preservation Time' g Aqueous Samples ' Orthophosphate 365.1-3 50 mL Glass Bottle Only Filter(0.45 µm) 48 Hours Cool to 4°C3 Oxygen, Dissolved 360.1 300 mL Glass Bottle Only None Analyze , Immediately me ' Phosphorous,Total 365.1-4 50 mL Glass Bottle Only HZSO to pH<2 Im Im Days Cool to 4°C3 Silica 370.1 50 mL Plastic Bottle Only Cool to 4°C3 28 Days Sulfate 375.1-4 50 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 28 Days Sulfide 376.1-2 500 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle NaOH to pH>9 7 Days 2 mL Zinc Acetate Sulfite Cool to 4°C3 377.1 50 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle None Analyze Immediately Conventional Organic Analyses Minimum Recommended Required n Category Methods Qty.' Container(s)2 Holding Aqueous Samples Preservation Time ' Biochemical 405.1 1 L Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 48 Hours Oxygen Demand (5 Day BOD) Chemical 410.1-4 50 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle HZSO,to pH<2 28 Da s (COD) Oxygen Demand Cool to 4°C3 y GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL 31 ' - • I • . .14*4 , ' Conventional Organic Analyses Minimum Recommended Required Holding Category Methods oty.' Container(s)' Preservation Time' ' Aqueous Samples Organic Carbon, 415.1 25 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle H2SO4 to pH<2 28 Days Total(TOC;. Cool to 40C' Phenolics 420.1-3 500 mL Glass Bottle Only H2SO4 to pH<2 28 Days ' Cool to 4°C' Surfactants 425.1 250 mL Plastic or Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C' 48 Hours (MBAS) Microbiological Analyses ' Minimum Recommended Required Holding Category Methods oty.' Container(s)2 Preservation Time' Aqueous Samples ' Coliform, Various 100 mL Sterilized Bottle Cool to 40C' 6 Hours Total(Wastewater) Remove Chlorine' Coliform, Various 100 mL Sterilized Bottle Cool to 4°C' 6 Hours Fecal (Wastewater) Remove Chlorine Coliform, Various 100 mL Sterilized Bottle Cool to 4°C' 30 Hours Total(Drinking Water) Remove Chlorine' Coliform, Various 100 mL Sterilized Bottle Cool to 4°C' 30 Hours Fecal(Drinking Water) Remove Chlorine' ' E.Coli Various 100 mL Sterilized Bottle Cool to 40C' 30 Hours (Drinking Water) Remove Chlorine' Radiological Analyses Minimum Recommended Required Holding Category Methods oty.' Container(s)? Preservation Time'_ Gross Alpha and Beta 900.0 1 L Plastic or Glass Bottle HCI or HNO,to pH<2 180 Days Radium-226 903.1 1 L Plastic or Glass Bottle HCI or HNO,to pH<2 180 Days Radium-228 904.0 1 L Plastic or Glass Bottle HCI or HNO,to pH<2 180 Days Strontium-90 905.0 1 L Plastic or Glass Bottle HCI or HNO,to pH<2 180 Days Tritium 906.0 1 L Glass Bottle None 180 Days 32 1 SAMPLING NOTES 1. The minimum quantity specified is the minimum amount of sample material the vial.The cap should then be gently placed on the vial,taking care not to necessary to perform the analysis.This quantity allows for no margin of disturb the crown of liquid,and firmly rotated tight.The vial should then be error. examined to verify the absence of all air bubbles. For some analyses,Groundwater Analytical recommends specific types and Solid samples for Volatile Organic Analyses(VOA)must also be collected ' numbers of containers(e.g.,an Aqueous Volatile Organic sample requires 3 with a minimum of headspace or air pockets.Sample vials should be packed x 40 mL Glass Vials w/teflon septum caps).In such cases,the recommended fully and tightly sealed.Vial threads should be wiped clean prior to capping container(s)allow for an adequate margin of error. for best seal.When packing vials,however,avoid excessive manipulation of the sample material which may result in a loss of volatile organics.A wide For other analyses,Groundwater Analytical only recommends a general type mouth 125 mL Glass Vial w/teflon septum cap is the preferred sample con- of container(e.g.,a Solid Semivolatile Organic sample requires a Glass Jar tainer. '- w/teflon liner).In such cases,it is strongly recommended that twice the mini- mum quantity of sample material be collected in the recommended type of 13. Solid samples for Volatile Organic Analyses may be collected in 40 mL Glass container. Vials that have been acidified with Sodium Bisulfate(NaHSO),Hydrochloric Acid(HCI)or Sulfuric Acid(HZSO,).The presence of acid in the container will For solid samples, in addition to the minimum quantities required for indi have no detrimental effect on the sample. vidual analyses, each sample also requires 20 g of sample material.for a percent solids(or percent moisture)determination. Example:A soil sample 14. Maximum holding time is 24 hours when Sulfide is present.Samples may be collected forTPH-IR(30 g),8 RCRA Metals(2.6 g)and PCBs(30 g)requires tested with lead acetate paper before the pH adjustment in order to deter- a minimum of 62.6 g of material for the desired analyses.and 20 g of material mine if Sulfide is present.If Sulfide is present,it can be removed by the addi- for percent solids(or percent moisture),for a total required minimum of 82.6 tion of Cadmium Nitrate powder until a negative spot test is obtained.The ' g of material.It is then recommended that this minimum by doubled,and at sample is then filtered,and NaOH is added to adjust the pH>12. least 165.2 g of sample material be collected in a Glass Jar w/teflon liner. 15. Adjust to pH<2 with Nitric Acid(HNO�)or Sulfuric Acid(H=SO).Acidification For solid samples,all minimum quantities are calculated net of all foreign retards biological action,reduces absorption effects and prevents the forma- objects,such as sticks,leaves and rocks. lion of precipitates and/or complexes. 2. Only sample containers pre-cleaned according to US EPA protocols are rec- 16. Samples should be collected with a minimum of aeration.The sample bottle ommended.Appropriate pre-cleaned and pre-preserved containers are avail- should be filled completely,excluding all headspace,and capped. able from Groundwater Analytical.Pre-cleaned sample containers should not be prerinsed with sample prior to sample collection. Prennsing may cause 17. Extractable organic samples are susceptible to Phthalate ester contamina- elevated results. tion. Phthalate ester contamination is generally caused by sample contact 3. Samples should be immediately cooled, with a plastic material,particularly flexible plastics.Use care to avoid sample stored and shipped refrigerated.4°C contact with any plastic,other than Teflon. (34°F)is the recommended temperature.Refrigeration retards biological deg- radation,reduces the volatility of compounds,retards the hydrolysis of non- 18. Specified quantities of sample material are for only single phase solid samples ' aqueous compounds, reduces absorption effects and prevents continuing (i.e.no free liquids).Liquid phase or multiple phase samples require different chemical reactions. quantities of sample material.Contact laboratory for advice prior to collecting 4. Adjust to pH<2 with Hydrochloric Acid(HCI).Acidification retards biological liquid phase or multiple phase samples for TCLP analyses. action,reduces absorption effects and prevents the formation of precipitates 19. Samples for TCLP Volatile Organics analysis must be leached within 14 days and/or complexes.Sulfuric Acid(Hz SO)or Sodium Bisulfate(NaHSO,)may of collection.The leachate must then be analyzed within 14 days of leaching. ' be substituted for HCI in EPA Methods 8010,8011,8020 and 8260. 5. Adjust to a pH range of 4.0 to 5.0 with Hydrochloric Acid(HCI),Sulfuric Acid Samples for TCLP Metals analysis must be leached within 28 days of collec- tion,if Mercury is being analyzed.The leachate must then be analyzed within (HZSO;)or Sodium Hydroxide(NaOH). 28 days of leaching.If Mercury is not being analyzed,then samples for TCLP Metals must be leached within 180 days of collection,and the leachate ana- ' 6. If sample will not be received by laboratory within 24 hours of collection,then lyzed within 180 days of leaching. adjust to specified pH range with Sulfuric Acid(HZSO)or Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH).The pH adjustment may be omitted if it is performed upon receipt at Samples for TCLP Semivolatile Organics,TCLP Pesticides,and TCLP Her- the laboratory within 24 hours,and may be omitted if the sample is extracted bicides analyses must be leached within 14 days of collection.The leachate within 48 hours of collection- must then be extracted within 7 days of leaching.The extract must then be 7. If free chlorine is present in the sample,then Sodium Thiosulfate(NazS O analyzed within 40 days of extraction. ,) should be added. Free chlorine can react with organic compounds to foorm 20. Samples must be analyzed within 7 days of collection.However,if Heptachlor chlorination by-products. Free chlorine is likely to be found in chlorinated is not being determined,sample holding time to analysis may be extended to municipal drinking waters and treated wastewaters.Sodium Thiosulfate,a 14 days. reducing agent,is added to remove the free chlorine.For most levels of free ' chlorine,add 4 drops of 10%Sodium Thiosulfate to samples in 40 mL vials, 21, Samples must be extracted within 7 days of collection.Extracts must then be and add 5 mL of 10%Sodium Thiosuffate to samples in 1 L Bottles. analyzed with 14 days of extraction. 8. The listed Holding Time is the maximum of time a sample may be held be- 22. Samples must be extracted within 14 days of collection.Extracts must then tween collection and initiation of analysis or extraction. be analyzed with 30 days of extraction. ' 9. Samples must be extracted within 7 days of collection.Extracts must then be 23. Samples must be extracted within 14 days of collection.Extracts must then analyzed within 40 days of extraction. be analyzed with 28 days of extraction. 10. Samples must be extracted within 14 days of collection.Extracts must then 24. Add 40-50 mg of Sodium Sulfite to each liter of sample to reduce free chlo- be analyzed within 40 days of extraction. rine that may be present.Free chlorine can react with organic compounds to form chlorination by-products. Free chlorine is likely to be found in chlod- 11. Samples for dissolved metals must be filtered priorto preservation with Nitric hated municipal drinking waters and treated wastewaters.Alternatively,use Acid(HNO).Filtration must be done with a 0.45 micron membrane filter. 40-50 mg of Sodium Arsenite.Do not use Sodium Thiosulfate,as it may pro- Field filtration and preservation is preferred, duce a residue of elemental sulfur which may interfere with the determination However,if field filtration is not possible,samples should be cooled to 4°C of some analytes.. ' and shipped to the laboratory for filtration and preservation.Filtration must be 25. Samples must be extracted within 7 days of collection.Extracts must then be done as soon as practical after collection.Groundwater Analytical recom- analyzed with 30 days of extraction. mends that filtration be done within 24 hours of collection.If samples are not going to be field filtered,do not preserve samples with Nitric Acid(HNO). 26. Add Sodium Thiosulfate to reduce free chlorine that may be present.Free ' 12. Aqueous samples for Volatile Organic Analyses(VOA)must be collected with chlorine can react with organic compounds to form chlorination by-products. Free chlorine is likely to be found in chlorinated municipal drinking waters. out any headspace or air bubbles.Volatile organics dissolved in water tend to Use approximately 80 mg of Sodium Thiosulfate per liter of sample. volatilize readily and will fill any air bubble available in the vial.Particularly with low level samples,this results in a loss of material upon opening the vial. 27. Samples must be extracted within 7 days of collection.Extracts must then be VOA vials must be filled slowly until the liquid forms a meniscus on the rim of analyzed with 21 days of extraction. ' GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL 33 - r COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STANDARD REFERENCES FOR MONITORING WELLS ' SECTION 1.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Section 1.2 Page i January 1991 SECTION 1.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ' 1.1 Foreword 1.2 Table of Contents 1.3 Definitions 2.0 First Steps 2.1 Reconnaissance Surveys 2.2 work and Cost Plans (Reserved) 2.3 Health and Safety Plans 3.0 Subsurface Investigations 3.1 Exploratory Test Pits 3.2 Drilling Techniques 3.3 Borings in Contaminated Areas 3.4 In-Situ Sampling of Soil ' 3.5 Soil Classification 3.6 In-situ sampling of Rock 3.7 Rock Classification 3*1 Laboratory Tests for Soil 3.9 Plugging Boreholes 4.0 Piezometers, observation Wells and Monitoring wells 4.1 Monitoring well Network Design � 4.2 Selection of Well Construction Materials, ' 4.3 well Installation Procedures s 4.4 As-built Notes and Records 4.5 well Development 4.6 Decommissioning of Monitoring wells 5.0 Interpretation of Ground Water and Aquifer Characteristics 5.1 Water Level Measurements ' 5.2 In-Situ Hydraulic Conductivity Tests, 5.3 Pumping Tests 5.4 Packer, Tests ' 5.5 Surveying and Datum Planes 6.0 Sampling of Monitoring wells ' 6.1 Quality Assurance/Quality control 6.2 sampling Techniques 6.3 Sample Handling ' 6.4 Chain of Custody 6.5 Decontamination of Sampling Equipment ' Section 1.2 Page ii January 1991 ' Section 1.2 Table of Contents (continued) ' 7.0 Computer Models (Reserved) 8.0 Geophysical Techniques (Reserved) t S - 1 it a RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE STATUS REPORT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN# 4-15283 ' Birmingham Residence 333 Eel River Road - Osterville, MA 02537 Project#B099-2533 t JUNE 159 2000 1 t 1 ENNET 91�E 1L SLY I nc. ' Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573"Main Street Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line PO Box 1667 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Brewster,MA 02631 Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Consulting Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax { r - t 1 BENNETT nO'REILLY, Inca Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street ' PO Box 1667 Sanitary 21E/Site Remediation Property Line Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Brewster, MA 02631 Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 1 Water Supply Licensed Site Professional Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax 1 June 15, 2000 B099-2533 ' Mr. Dan Crafton, Case Officer MA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION- SOUTHEAST REGION Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup/Emergency Response Section 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 RE: RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE STATUS REPORT ' Birmingham Residence --RTN#4-15283 ' 333 Eel River Road- Osterville,MA Dear Mr. Crafton, 1 BENNETT & O'REILLY> INC. has prepared re ared the following report, with supporting documentation, as a Release Abatement Measure (RAM) Status Report for the.above referenced ' property in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0445.- This report is an addendum to the RAM Plan filed with the MA DEP on January 31,2000, and to which verbal approval was issued on February 10,2000. The RAM Plan included the removal of contaminated soils through the capillary 1 fringe and soil mixing with the oxidant Regenesis ORC. Prior to backfill, a passive soil vapor extraction (SVE) system was constructed to further promote bioremedial treatment of low level residual groundwater impact and to facilitate additional treatment. Based upon site specific 1 conditions, this approach was viewed as the preferred remedial strategy to mitigate human and environment health hazards associated with the release of an unknown quantity of#2 fuel oil from 1 an abandoned 1,000 gallon underground storage tank(UST). The RAM Status Report represents the subsequent remedial response and environmental 1 assessment activities conducted in the period from February 2000 through May 2000. The remedial activities conducted in February 2000, included the removal of 185.7 tons of contaminated soils from a 20'x 15'x 16'area,the evacuation of 1,494 gallons of impacted groundwater,the installation ' of a soil vapor extraction (SVE) system and the addition of remedial additives to promote bioremediation treatment to low level groundwater impact and any residual soil impact. The three original on-site monitoring wells(MW-1 through MW-3)have been sampled periodically in review 1 of closure objectives and remedial system performance. Soil analysis of sidewall and bottom of hole samples at the extent of excavation reported petroleum concentrations as meeting Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards. Groundwater analysis,however,,has shown the persistence of low level f JUNE 15,2000 BMMINGHAM/13099-2533 PAGE 2 OF 10 RAM STATUS REPORT impact at the MW-3 monitoring well with oxygen deficiency as limiting bioremedial treatment. All other monitor wells have reported petroleum concentrations below the Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. Supplemental ORC application was made in the early part of May with the intent to meet closure objectives prior to the RAM Status filing deadline and seasonal occupancy ' of the dwelling. Although re-application has accounted. for increased dissolved oxygen in groundwater, increased microbial counts and decreasing EPH concentrations at MW-3 marginally above the GW-1 standards,treatment is insufficient at this time to support the Class A(non AUL), ' Response Action Outcome for project closure. Based upon documentation of favorable environmental conditions to sustain bioremedial treatment,it is anticipated that closure objective will be met within the next six months This work has proceeded under my direction in a manner consistent with the MCP Response Action Performance Standards(RAPS),pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0191 and the QA/QC policies of BENNETT&O'REILLY, INC. The facts and statements herein are,to the best of my knowledge, a true and accurate representation of the site activities,remedial response actions and environmental conditions associated with the project. This documentation serves as the technical justification and rationale for the RAM Completion Statement represented herein in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0400 to mitigate the environmental impact identified and meet project and regulatory ' closure objectives for a Class A, RAO. SITE DESCRIPTION [Refer to Appendix A] ' The subjectproperty, identified on Barnstable Assessor's Ma 115 as Parcel 2 is located J P � . approximately 1 mile south of the center of Osterville at 333 Eel River Road. The parcel contains ' some 2.10 acres of land originally developed in the early 1920's. The site presently contains a single family residential dwelling,detached garage and a shed. Access to the area of release is unrestricted. The surrounding neighborhood is moderately developed with similar residential dwellings. The site and surrounding area are serviced by municipal water supply with no known private ' well within 500'of the release area. The site is not'located within the Zone II Protective Radius of any public water supply or within 200'Of any surface water reservoir. Groundwater was discovered at 15'below grade in the area of release. Site specific groundwater contours indicate a northwesterly ' to southwesterly groundwater flow direction toward Eel River, adjacent to the property, and out to West Bay. Eel River, located some 160'+/- west of the area of release, is considered the closest wetland and has been identified as the primary environmental receptor. Based upon the Sole Source Aquifer designation of Cape Cod .and the proximity of groundwater underlying the dwelling, the GW-1, GW-2 and GW-3 groundwater categories appear ' to be applicable in review of exposure and risk characterization. Based upon frequency and intensity of use for soils below 3' in an unpaved area, the S-2/GW4 soil category is applicable as most restrictive in review of exposure and risk characterization.. The RCS-1 Reportable Concentration . ' soil category is also applicable in review of response action performance, based upon the proximity JUNE 15,2000 BIRMINGHAM/BO99-2533 PAGE 3 OF 10 RAM STATUS REPORT t of the release to the dwelling. The RCGW-1 Reportable Concentration is further applicable based upon the sites location within a Potential Drinking Water.Source Area. , BACKGROUND [Refer to Appendix BJ ' On October 7, 1999,in anticipation of the installation of an upgraded sewage disposal system, EnviroSafe,Corp., of East Sandwich,MA.,was scheduled and permitted to removal an abandoned ' 1,000 gallon underground storage tank(UST) formerly used to store#2 fuel oil. According to the owners, the vessel had been abandoned for at least 28 years. In preparation for the removal of the vessel,EnviroSafe, Corp. evacuated some 60 gallons of oil/water mix from the tank. Upon removal i ' and subsequent cleaning of the vessel, substantial corrosion was noted with the removal of scaling revealing numerous holes along the bottom of the tank. The Barnstable Board of Health and Centerville, Osterville and Marstons Mills (COW Fire Department were notified and responded ' to the site. BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., was subsequently contacted by EnviroSafe, Corp. to provide professional services relative to the investigation of the apparent fuel oil release. BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.,personnel(David C.Bennett,LSP and Kara Shumway,ES) responded to the site at approximately 12:40pm and were met by EnviroSafe, Corp. personnel (2 laborers), Shoreline Construction (Bruce McAllister and two laborers) and the Barnstable Health Inspector(Ed Barry). Upon arrival,BENNETT&O"REILLY,INC.,inspected the extracted vessel. Substantial corrosion with wetness,as well as several holes in the bottom ofthe tank, 1/8"to 3" long, ' were noted. An area of clean overburden stockpiled on poly-sheeting was also noted. Initial environmental assessment included three hand borings conducted in the BOH area to ' determine the magnitude and extent of contaminated soils. Continuous soil samples were collected at two foot intervals to a depth of 15'where soils became damp with groundwater. The samples were placed in a sealed 300 milliliter glass jar with an aluminum septum and agitated to develop organic ' vapors. The soil samples were then screened with a photoionization detector(PID)meter(HNU PI 101, 10.2 electron volt lamp).by"jar headspace"analysis,as consistent with MA DEP"Interim...Soils Policy"WSC-94-400. PID screening indicated the presence of contamination at the 14-15'interval ' BENNETT&O'REILLY INC. instructed EnviroSafe Corp ,personnel to secure the tank grave with plywood and poly-sheeting. Fencing was also placed around the excavation. Soil samples ' were assembled, preserved and forwarded to Groundwater Analytical of Buzzards Bay, MA for analyses on a 3 day rush. BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.,received laboratory analytical on October 14, 1999. Analysis conducted on FIB-IM-3 for the 6-14'interval revealed a TPH concentration of 840 mg/Kg. HB-3:14-15'revealed elevated levels for the,C9-C 18 and C-11 to C-22 fraction of the EPH analysis. Soil samples collected at the overburden stockpile revealed a level below reportable limits(BRL). Based upon these laboratory results,a 120 day Notification Requirement and remedial ' response appeared necessary. JUNE 15,2000 BU MINGHAMB099-2533 PAGE 4 OF 10 RAM STATUS REPORT To further define the extent and magnitude of soil and potential.groundwater impact, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., recommended additional environmental assessment activities in review ofNotification Requirements and conceptualization of appropriate remedial response action. Authorization was subsequently issued by the owner and on October 29, 1999, BENNETT & ' O'REILLY,INC.,returned to the Birmingham property,with Jenkins Well Drilling,to conduct test borings for soil sampling and monitor well installation. ' A series of three test borings(TB-4, TB-5 and TB-6)were advanced along the perimeter of the UST grave within 20'of the release area for`the installation of monitoring wells to qualify capillary fringe and groundwater impact. 2' soil samples at 3' intervals were collected at each test boring location for subsurface characterization and field PID screening in accordance with WSC-94-400 [Refer to Geologic Borehole Logs]. Capillary fringe and groundwater impact were apparent in all test boring locations [Refer to Site Plan for locations]. A series of three hand borings were also ' conducted at this time. Again, capillary fringe and groundwater impact were noted in each of the hand borings conducted to a depth of 15'. [Refer to Site Plan for locations]. 1 Select soil samples were assembled,preserved and forwarded to Groundwater Analytical of Buzzards Bay, MA for analyses on a Priority 5 day turnaround. BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., received laboratory analytical on November 5, 1999. Significant DRO concentrations, well above ' the S-2/GW-1 Method 1 -Risk Characterization as well as the RCS-1 Reportable Concentrations, were noted in the HB-7:6-15' and TB-5:13-15' soil samples (1,200 mg/Kg and 2,700 mg/Kg, ' respectively). HB-9:6-15' was reported well below both standards, and TB-6:18-20' samples was reported as Below Reportable Limits (BRL) (<66mg/Kg). ' Two inch, flush joint, PVC monitor wells were installed at each of the three test boring locations. Each of the wells were developed by purging 10 gallons, and sampled and preserved for EPH analysis. Groundwater samples were forwarded to Groundwater Analytical of Buzzards Bay, MA on a Priority 5 day turnaround. Laboratory analysis showed MW-1,MW-2 and MW-3 reporting elevated concentrations ofcarbon compounds in the C 11-C22 range(240ug/L,210ug/L and 3 80ug/L, respectively). It should be noted that, although the GW-1 standards were exceeded,these samples ' contained<5mg/L of Volatile Organic Compounds. As such,groundwater was not considered to be a potential source of vapors to the dwelling and therefore, did not trigger a 72 hour Notification Requirement. ' On November 5, 1999,BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.,personnel(David C.Bennett,LSP, Kara Shumway,ES)returned to the subject site to meet with the property owners,the Birminghams, j ' as well as the property representative, E.J. Jaxtimer. Laboratory analysis of supplemental environmental data for soil and groundwater samples collected October 29, 1999 were reviewed, relative to Notification Requirements and appropriate remedial response activities. BENNETT & 1 O'REILLY, INC., advised the homeowners of the findings relative- to a discrete area of soil contamination in the vadose zone surrounding the UST grave, with a greater area of significant capillary fringe soil and groundwater impact. Based upon this information, it was determined that I , . JUNE 15,2000 BRUWNGHAM/B099-2533 PAGE 5 OF 10 RAM STATUS REPORT soils in the area of the former UST do represent a continuing source of contaminant impact to groundwater. As such,it was recommended to the property owners that a remedial response action be coordinated with the proposed septic system upgrade,as excavation in this area would eliminate contaminant soil and provide an opportunity to construct an SVE manifold to be used as a sub-slab venting system. RAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SOIL In accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0443(3),BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC., proceeded with the implementation of the approved RAM plan on February 10,2000. On this date, BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., supervised and inspected soil removal operations at the subject property. These activities consisted of the excavation and direct transport of some 124 yards of contaminated soils,the evacuation of some 1,494 gallons of impacted groundwater,the introduction of Oxygen Release Compound(ORC),and the construction of a soil vapor extraction(SVE)system within the area of release. EnviroSafe Corporation personnel served as the on-site environmental contractor, while Shoreline Construction served as the excavation contractors. All excavated soils ' were direct loaded and transported off-site to a licensed asphalt batching facility under an approved Bill of Lading. Likewise,impacted groundwater was transported off-site to a licensed facility under a Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest. Soil removal activities begin with the excavation of some 6' of clean overburden from a 30' x 25'area surrounding the former tank grave and stockpiled on-site. Further excavation of soils was facilitated by the temporary placement of driven sheet piles as required to protect the structural integrity of the adjacent dwelling, as well as to inimiz*e infiltration of clean soil back into the tank grave. Impacted soils were excavated from a 20' x 15'x 9' (D) area centered on the tank grave as ' defined through preliminary assessment activities conducted. Groundwater was encountered at 15- 16' below grade. A sump was created at the western corner of the excavation and a vac-truck, supplied and operated by EnviroSafe, was utilized to de-water the excavation allowing for the extension of soil removal through the capillary fringe. A bottom ofhole(BOH)soil sample was collected at 16'and field tested by PetroFLAG TPH analysis. A TPH concentration of 61 mg/kg was recorded. As such,excavation activities in the BOH of hole area was considered complete and confirmatory soil samples were collected and submitted for quantitative laboratory analysis of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) and target ' polynucleur aromatic hydrocarbon(PAH)analytes in accordance with the provision ofthe"MA DEP VPH/EPH Implementation Approach"guidance policies. With steel plated shoring in place,a hand auger was required to collect sidewall samples adjacent to the excavated area. The hand auger was ' advanced on the outside perimeter excavation within 12" of the sheet piling and confirmatory soil samples were collected, as representing the discreet 6-15' interval, and submitted for quantitative laboratory,analysis of EPH and target PAH analytes. I JUNE 1 s 2000 B IRMINGHAMB099-2533 PAGE 6 OF 10 _ RAM STATUS REPORT The oxidant ORC (60 lbs) was then mixed with soils in the BOH as a polishing agent to address low-level groundwater impact, and to further promote cleanup to background conditions. Representative samples were forwarded to Groundwater Analytical Laboratories of Buzzards Bay, MA for rush turnaround. Laboratory analytical results were received February 15, 2000. These analyses reported low level residual contamination levels in each of the four sidewalls as well below the applicable S-2/GW-1 Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards, as well as the most stringent S-1/GW-1 category. The BOH sample was reported as Below Reportable Limits(BRL<33mg/Kg). A summary of the laboratory results for soil samples collected at the extent of excavation, with the Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards is represented on Table 1. TABLE I SUMMARY OF EPH ANALYSIS FOR METHOD 1-RISK CHARACTERIZATION: SOIL SAMPLE EPH'w/target S-1 Soil Standard S-2:Soil Standard S 3 Soil Standard LOCATION PAHs (PP-) (ppm) (ppm) (mg/kg-ppm) 310 CMR 40.0975(6)(a) 310 CMR 40.0.75(61 310 CMR 40.0975(6)(c) i MA DEP Method GW-1/GW-2/GW-3 GW-1/GW 21UW 3 GW-1/GW-2/GW-3 SW-N:615' C9toC18 1I0 1,000/1,000/1,000 2,500/2;500/2,300 51000/5,000/5,000 C19 to C36 BRL(<30) 2,500/2,500/2,500 5,00015,00015,000 5,00015,00015,000 Cl1 to C22 39 200/800/800 200/2;000/2;000 200/5,000/5,000 All target PAlt<0.56 >4/>100/>100 >4/1,000/1,000 >4/1,000/1,000 SW-E:6-15' C9toC18 41 1,000/1,000/1,000 2,500/2,500/2,500 5,00015,00015,000 C19 to C36 BRL(<30) 2,500/2,500/2,500 .5,00015,00015,000 5,000/5,000/5,000 CIItoC22 BRL(<30) 200/800/800 200/2,00012;000 200/5,000/5,000 All target PAHs<0.50 >4/>100h100 >4/1,000/1,000 >4/1,000/1,000 SW-W:6-15' C9toC18 480 1,000/1,000/1,000 2,500/2,500/2,500 5,00015,00015,000 ' C19 to C36 64 2,500/2,500/2,500 5;000/5,000/5,000 5,00015,00015,000 CI l to C22 160 200/800/800 .200/2,000/2,000 200/5,000/5,000 All taut PAHs<1.3 >4h100h100 >4/1,000/1,000 >4/1,000/1,000 SW-S:6-11' C91oC18 42 1,000/1,000/1,000 2,50012,500/2500 51000/5,000/5,000 C19toC36 BRL 2,500/2,500/2,500 '.,`:5,000/5,000151, 5,00015,00015,000 ' C 11 to C22 BRL 200/800/800 200/2 000/2 000 20015,000/5,000 All target PAHs<0.56 >4h100h100 >4/1,000/1000 >4/1,000/1,000 130H:16' C9toC18 BRL 1,000/1,000/1,000 2500/2500/ZS00 5,00015,00015,000 ' C19 to C36 BRL 2,500/2,500/2,500 5;000/5,000/3;000 5,00015,00015,000 CI to C22 BRL 200/800/800 200/2 000/2,. 200/5,000/5,000 All target PAHs<0.56 >4hI00h100. >4/1,00011,000 >4/1,000/1,000 EPH'=Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon ' BRL=Below Reporting Limits Shaded areas represent applicable Method 1-Risk Characterization Standards Prior to backfill, a soil vapor extraction(SVE) manifold was constructed within the bottom of the excavation to serve as a sub-slab venting system for any organic vapors and to promote additional oxygen flow facilitating natural attenuation and biodegradation of any residual contaminant. ' The SVE was retrofitted with a port for supplemental application of remedial additives within the bottom of hole area, if found to be necessary, to address low level residual groundwater and/or capillary fringe impact. f _ JUNE 15,2000 BIItMIIdGHAM/BO99-2533 PAGE 7 OF 10 RAM STATUS REPORT ' GROUNDWATER . Preliminary groundwater analysis had shown low level groundwater impact in each of the three monitor wells (MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3) located along the perimeter, and within 15', of the area of defined soil impact. EPH analysis reported the C11 to C22 fractional aromatic compounds as marginally exceeding the Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards for the applicable GW-1 standards prior to soil removal. The EPH concentration were substantially below the GW-2 and GW- 3 standards in all wells. ' Groundwater gauging has been conducted during all on-site inspections over various tide cycles at the three existing monitoring wells to further qualify groundwater flow direction to the southwest and for aquifer characterization.Groundwater samples from each of the three monitoring wells have been tested for baseline standard water chemistry to determine background conditions prior to, and concurrent with, remedial additive application pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0040. The wells have also been screened for headspace,as well as pH, conductivity and temperature,as well as dissolved oxygen as the primary factor limiting the biodegradation rate of petroleum hydrocarbons in a groundwater system. This data is being used in review of available nutrients, oxygen,microbial populations and activity in review of bioremedial capacity for mineralization of carbon in petroleum compounds as a food source. Prior to oxidant application, heterotrophic bacteria counts in the monitor wells were reported at less than 100 per ml as further demonstrating the limitation of ' available dissolved oxygen(< 1.0 mg/L). ' To further evaluate the effect of soil removal and remedial additive application on residual low level dissolved phase groundwater impact, a series of slug tests were conducted to measure site specific hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer [Refer to Appendix B]. The AQTESOLVE software developed by Geraghty&Miller was used to enter field measurements of rising head to compute an ' hydraulic conductivity of 215 ft/day. With a measured hydraulic gradient of.001 ft/ft and an assumed porosity of 25%, a groundwater flow velocity of 0.85 ft/day was established. Based on a 20% " retardation factor, "Time of Travel" from the area of the UST grave to the downgradient monitor wells MW-2 and MW-3, was estimated as 18 days. REMEDIAL RESPONSE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SOILS ' Laboratoryanalysis of sidewall and bottom of hole soil Samples collected'at the extent f Y P - o excavation reported EPH fractional compounds and target PAH analytes as significantly below the appropriate SW-2/GW-1, and most restrictive S-1/GW-1, Method 1 - Risk Characterization standards. As such, excavation of petroleum impacted soils had successfully mitigated exposure hazards to human and environmental receptors and had effectively eliminated the contaminant source ' responsible for chronic dissolved phase groundwater impact. f ' JUNE 15,2000 BIRMINGHAM/BO99-2533 PAGE 8 OF 10 RAM STATUS REPORT GROUNDWATER The first round of groundwater sampling and monitoring well screening within the calculated time of solute transport was conducted on February 29, 2000,to review the effectiveness of the soil removal operations and the ORC application. DO monitoring was vital to evaluating bioremedial performance. MW-1 saw a slight increase in DO from 1.7mg/L to 2.3mg/L 19 days after the ORC application. DO at MW-2 remained at 1.6mg/L and decreased at MW-3 from 1.Omg/L to 0.3mg/L. Laboratory analytical received March 15,2000 reported each of the three EPH fractions for MW-1 and MW-2 as BRL, as evidence that source removal had improved groundwater quality in the area of release. A slight decrease was also noted in the C11-C22 fraction at MW-3 with a reported concentration of 370 ug/L. As such, it appeared that the dissolved oxygen was being utilized by bacteria facilitating insitu bioremediation through the mineralization of residual petroleum contamination, reducing and soon eliminating residual groundwater impact. Furthermore, it appeared that the placement of additional downgradient monitoring wells,as stated in the RAM Plan, would not be necessary as.groundwater impact some 18' west of the release area appeared to be attenuating and any significant risk would soon be eliminated. Approximately one month later,on April 6 2000 a second round of screening and sampling, PP Y � P � � g p g - was conducted. DO levels had decreased to virtually non-existent levels in monitoring wells MW-I ' through MW-3(O.Omg/L,0.1mg/L,0.0mg/L,respectively). Laboratory analytical received April 21, 2000 again reported EPH fractional concentrations as BRL for MW-1 and MW-2. The downgradient MW-3,however,continued to show a persistence of groundwater contamination with an increase in ' the C 11-C22 fraction to a concentration to 610 ug/L. The presence of 2-methylnaphthalene was also detected as exceeding the GW-I (ingestion),Method 1 -Risk Characterization standard of 10 ug/L. At no time has groundwater impact exceeded the GW-2 (inhalation) or GW-3 (direct contact) Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards. This data indicated that deficient oxygen levels were limiting the bacterial mineralization of residual impact and that further remedial action involving the re-application of ORC would be required to meet closure objectives(Class A,RAO w/o AUL)[Refer ' to Figure 2]. It was also decided that two additional groundwater monitoring wells would be required to evaluate downgradient groundwater impact intermediate of the area of release and the identified environmental receptor(Eel River). On May- 11 20005 an Dissolved Oxygen.at MW-3 (mg/L) additional 120 lbs. of ORC in a _ nutrient solution were injected through the SVE port into the former 1.5 tank grave to increase dissolved 1 oxygen and promote microbial 0.5 growth. Two test borings'. were ' 0 conducted on the west side of the Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- dwelling, intermediate of the release 99 00 00 00 00 00 area, and Eel River., Subsurface Figure 2:Measured dissolved oxygen concentrations at the MW-3 downgradient monitor well. ' JUNE 15 2000 BIRMINGHAM/BO99-2533 PAGE 9 OF 10 RAM STATUS REPORT conditions were documented and soil samples were continuously collected at 2' intervals and field ' screened for headspace. No soil impact was noted at that time as based upon headspace screening. Groundwater monitoring wells,MW-4 and MW-5,were then installed at each location as previously described. ' With the regulatory deadline for the submittal of a RAM Status Report approaching,a request II for an extension was filed with the Department so that the results of the latest ORC application could be evaluated against project closure criteria. BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC., returned to the site on May 30, 2000 to screen, develop and sample all five monitoring wells for EPH analysis and standard wet chemistry through the established Time.of Travel. DO slightly increased at all monitoring wells with MW-1 at 2.6mg/L, MW-2 at 3.8mg/L and MW-3 at 1.3mg/L. MW-4 and MW-5 were also screened for DO in this latest round with concentrations of 2.3mg/L and 0.3mg/L, respectively. Laboratory analytical received June 7,2000 reported EPH fractional concentrations as II ' BRL for MW-1 and MW-2. MW-4 and MW-5 were also reported as BRL, indicating no downgradient dissolved phase petroleum impact at Eel River. Although MW-3 continues to demonstrate impact in the Cll-C22 range, the fractional concentration -has decreased by ' approximately 50%from 610 to 360ug/L.The analytical data for groundwater analysis is snrnrrlarized on Table 3 with the applicable Method 1 -Risk Characterization standards for the applicable GW-1, GW-2 and GW-3 categories. TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF EPH ANALYSIS FOR METHOD 1-RISK CHARACTERIZATION: GROUNDWATER SAMPLE EPH'Results EPH'Results EPH'Results EPH'Results GROUNDWATER;;:`, LOCATION (ug/L-ppb) (ug/L-ppb) (ug/L-ppb) (ug/L-ppb) Standerd;(uglL} `;_' MA DEP Method MA DEP Method MA DEP Method MA DEP Method 316 CMR40 0974(2) . (10/29/99) (2/29/00) (4/6/00) (5/30/00) GW 1/GW-2/GW 3 MW-1 C9 to C 18 BRL(<530) C9 to C18 BRL(<530) C9 to C 18 BRL(<520) C9 to C 18 BRL(<560) 4 000/1,000/20 000 ' C 19 to C36 BRL(<530) C 19 to C36 BRL(<530) C l9 to C36 BRL(<520) C 19-C36 BRL(<560) S 000/NA/20 000 Cl l to C22 240 C11 to C22 BRL(<200) Cl l to C22 BRL(<200) Cl l to C22 BRL(<200) 200/1,000I20 000 TARGET PAH BRL(<10) >20/6 000/6 000 MW-2 C9 to C18 BRL(<630) C9 to Cl8 BRL(<500) C9 to C18 BRL(<540) C9 to C18 BRL(<590) 40t)0/1 000/20 000 C19 to C36 BRL(<630) C19 to C36 BRL(<500) C19 to C36 BR14<540) C19-06 BRL(<590) S 000/NAi20 000 C11 to C22 210 Cll to C22 BRL(<200) Cll to C22 BRL(<200) C11 to C22 BRL(<200) , 200/1;...__0000 TARGET PAH BRL(<1 l) >20/6 OOD/6 000 ' MW-3 C9 to C 18 BRL(<540) C9 to C 18 BRL(<500) C9 to Cl8 BRL(<530) C9 to C18 BRL(<530) 4 000/1,000/20 000 C 19 to C36 BRL(<540) C 19 to C36 BRL(<500) C19 to C36 BRL(<530) C19-36 BRL(<530) S OOOVNA/ZO 000 Cl 1 to C22 380 Cl I to C22 370 C11 to C22 610 Cl l to C22 360 200/1 000/20 Q00 Naphthalene BRL(<I1) 20/6,00016000 Phenandme BRL(<11) 300/NA/SO Acenaphthene BRL(<I 1) 20/NA/S 000 M-naphthalene 87 10/10 000l3 000 MW-4 NA NA NA C9 to C18 BRL(<530) 4,000/l 000t20000 C19-C36 BRL(<530) S,000/NA/20000 C11 to C22 BRL(<200) 200/1000/20 000 MW-5 NA NA NA C9 to C18 BRL(<530) 4,000t1 OOOR0,000 C19-C36 BRL(<530) 5;000/NA/20,000 C l 1 to C22 BRL(<200) 200t1 000/ZO Oq0 EPH'=Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon/BRL=Below Reporting Limits Shaded area represents applicable Method 1-Risk Characterization Standards/BOLD text indicates concentrations exceeding applicable standards JUNE 15,2000 BIRMINGHAWBO99-2533 PAGE 10 OF 10 RAM STATUS REPORT Heterotrophic Bacteria at MW-3 (ml) Furthermore; heterotrophic --*-HeteroBacteda bacteria experienced a significant increase at MW-3 from< 100 per ml 8000 in February 2000 to 7,400 per ml. 6000 Increasing DO and bacteria levels ' coupled with decreasing fractional 4000 EPH concentrations represent 2000 improving groundwater quality for the subject site' and appear to 0 indicate that project closure will Feb-00 Mar-00 Apr-00 May-00 soon be met.- Figure 4:Increased baderia count in MW-3 associated with the re-application of ORC 1 CONCLUSION The most recent water quality analysis indicates a persistence of decreasing low level ' groundwater contamination for the downgradient MW-3. Based upon increased DO concentrations and bacteria counts,with decreasing EPH concentrations in a discreet downgradient area, it appears additional time is required for the complete remediation of groundwater to meet closure objectives. Groundwater sampling for EPH analysis will be conducted on a bi-monthly basis with the next round to be conducted in July 2000. Additional,ORC may be added as necessary via the SVE port.to maintain sufficient DO concentrations. It is anticipated that project and regulatory closure objectives iwill be met within the next six months,at which point a RAM Completion Statement, in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0446, along with a Response Action Outcome, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1000, ; will be submitted by December 2000. i Should the Department have any questions regarding this submittal, or need additional information, please contact me directly at our office. VWonvironmental BEILLY, INC DLSP Kara Sh way, ES D Project Manager cc: John&Karen Birmingham, Owners Joanne Benson, CHUBB & SONS INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. Peter Harley,RANSOM ENVIRONMENTAL Barnstable Health Department Centerville, Osterville,Marstons Mills Fire Department Barnstable Chief Municipal Officer RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN#4-15283 Birmingham Residence 333 Eel River Road-Osterville,MA 02537 ' Project#13099-2533 DUNE 15,2000 ' b Prepared : p Y ' BENNETT &O'REILLY,INC. 1573 Main Street P.O. Box 1667 ' Brewster,MA 02631 On Behalf Of: John&Karen Birmingham 333 Eel River Road-Osterville,MA 02655 Prepared For: ' MA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Southeast Regional Office-Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup/Emergency.Response Section t20 Riverside Drive-Lakeville,MA 02347 APPENDIX A:Reference Plans ' - Site Locus Plan (USGS Osterville Quandrangle).y[Excerpt]. -Hydrologic Map(CCPEDC, 1993) -MA DEP GIs MAP-Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Overlay(1997)[Excerpt] ' - Site Plan, "Release Abatement Measure", Prepared.by BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC.; Dated 11/8/99(Rev. 6/1/00) APPENDIX B:Field Reports ' -Monitor Well Sampling Logs - Geologic Borehole Logs -Field Inspection Reports#1 through#8 (2/7/00 through 5/30/00). -Borehole Permeability Test -AQTESOLV-Bouwer&Rice(Unconfined Aquifer Slug Test)Analytical Method APPENDIX C:Environmental Records - Soil Recycling Submittal/Bill of Lading,BWSC-012 A,B,C -Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest -MA DEP BWSC-102B Release Log Form Attachment- ' -BWSC-106 Release Abatement Measure Transmittal Form APPENDIX D:Laboratory Analytical APPENDIX E: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan 1 � I � I 1 APPENDIX A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' ' I 9 yy4146 TO°21 . J /. �`,.: (�+ {� 7:' .-.7pp' .S+ � ._ � � � •. t it � . ..-�-�`�4_ 1 a ret ��•)✓�,�,>(:(�\k a <$ s to r.�. ,�� k. ))),,,4 t L J�-.�b .t (,�, �•,eJ T •Q P' �_ , 16 ' ♦ ♦a ..•d,�' •'•" -�., .._ OpxSB Q,i is 4 •> • y i p µ r �+1©` : p � `� , �'-•-� � LOCUS ao { �\ •` \1At1 a ' ` 1 ` `a •d a p tight �Q✓✓ g ' °3SS6•,70°2437•NAD83 11RI'1 0 1/2 1 MLE 16°�� 1000 0 1000 25 3000 4000 FEET LLLYYY PxWed from TOPO!01999 Wildflower Productions(wwm.topo.wa) i FIGURE 1: The subject site,located at 333 Eel River Road,contains a single family residential dwelling,a detached garage,and a shed on some 1,01 acres of land.The site is directly adjacent to the Eel River and West Bay,which abut the property to the west. The surrounding neighborhood is moderately developed with similar residential dwellings. T {/ - r + CE 371 - .- / _ T / V 27-5 E 259 Sr 33.7)k_ = 'i ��p CE373 -- 6.4�1 `mil 7.0 r CO 59'QO.3315.3 �CE 58` -;`Pl CE.S8�9-O�.,": - k. GE 107-® 0 369 r� 1 �.. 25l s c � x 41 0 } . CO-224 N<< As, LOCUS :i Al A•l W.326-329 ` .-_.'Y..� , �vAAt t35"I i.7Yi�lt �y+"d'FS.. - V •� I 9 SEA ! {� r -<3ilAWO 51t►AFO,A 1 Shy - `N'y�.. _ ? LEVE 5 7'rtF• (' D l 2 ,j�`3�1w+Y'YY t. M1� `��C„�'fa.• � FIGURE 2: Groundwater was discovered at 15'below grade at the point of release. Regional groundwater contours indicate a southerly groundwater flow direction toward Nantucket South,with strong tidal influence stemming from West Bay. West Bay, located adjacent to the property,approximately 160'west of the area of release,is also considered the ' closest wetland. �t�'� s r �alf°!fti iE'i f� • t ` ` ii4a i111 Al•f� °a d 7s c 5 'tIt i�!►�`R�� +�1�1w !!-!!►`f'- « 8t�4iii�yii�q*� .' +*' y ' N!'ol, lat a t ♦ lP it ►- • ® g r _�►IN W Sk �.. h! �!\ � !q41►►MC.INIS,eh! it.►!��t �,.:to to ggox N-ik 3!'!t }�i►!i�!` 4e�i�i� '«� _ !ii`!-ei�. ��.!\�P•..�i14�..._ :.e'�i8ayaii@i!y ;� I Yam,- �► ►! !►ao ► • !► f t 70 wry �.�. ��lh��,.►:�-! ,,�'► �► 1'►'., '�■yam. _ �� +- �Of�f y�+�ny �eT J� y ■i r -f_.�!-ter ,. a '�IR,• -I;i§ aar' •a � t� `' �';' ' '�'�dt.., .t.< ��,I� �1 ►:ss if L Toi' �f✓� � �.. !v-+fir �• �'"f% 0,4 • 4 - �' : • 11 JI fro - h- 0 •' 11111t- 0 - ' • - ' • P 1 �� < � ' ZL , p. al +4�•G:., ®Pri'Y Srw+L..e -_Ff;i('., •-i _ ��.:. ��/I { � � w -- �� ._.._�...1 r 1.. � } : { 7 _ t I � ' w- !7 ' M Vj `y— 17,c7 I 4I : ✓ ;. �%�{�° � i i ' ? l1;ar�jcj^r ri#,.'?1'..'r s t (' ty.�q P • l t 1 E7 "tom 1,NO0, , P - -- ---,- ---- ----- - i{i 1 µ,pa -� AP o s4ac y '�`r ?) f '(p Ml!TJTdalal ; f 51D A�_. \�' s j _ .! j _._. - - _ war+ z i. MPf;,=�)M e !s c Qi } � r�UC? �If t 1Ti t ��:: ri!,;_Is-r uc MAJ 40TE•'k} rv� ✓! ,_ r�� 4.� -' � 3 lZ 3 4l P'p t'' �M tD xr ti!?g r. _ r- M - tt . f - r � MYv 17, -:514 ® 4 ! i _ } r I j f �?0-Oo 4 11 •04 ��1N Tiles C jj Mw- } ; ,i � �--- I i f/ l r-'�t,_ YW� /j j ! l 1 t l P 1 jI { , f IF (P)' l ; - ,,rl zv 1 1 3 r{ :of i- rvq 1y 1 1 y t ' of 9T W VA t_ T Cs i 3 M 11 , UCA t9}+" ,CTF:.r. TtA(_ PA ,FCC'•- 40 � ,.� - i . Q I(A.>ll t; ; r M _Mott- F;E1_V; LAt IFF-V; -} 'o o ,4r Ott A r ��, "- _ f?;` t1 w rah•✓ �' f 1, r, f '.V C.,�L Uy ,0.I,r Z sj S4:.ta" 7NAAs '` j� P PROJECT IL ° r TL71 ffr he�'�f"ems` TI LEAM yr :uva_.m _.,r._..,.... _ a.n.• ^P'!v'D..'+"y _._'rv'r. �S IS A REVISED VI , U °; -V. L� �L�'✓�BY BENNETT A OTEILLY Inc. , a �CL Engineering & Environmental Services m _r D ALL PRIOR DIS LO o w 84 Underpass Road f"v(", P.O. Box 1667 z t } -- -..-- -.---•.'-- 508.896.6630 Office Brewster, MA 02631 508-896-4687 Fax a -- z DATE: SCALE: BV. CHECK JOB NUMBER: x 1 1 1 1 1 � APPENDIX B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J • iBEN NETT & OREILLY, Inc. 1573 Main Street,P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 . Engineering and Environmental Services (508) 896-6630 ' MONITOR WELL SAMPLING LOG CLIENT Birmingham Residence DATE(S) 1/10/00 ' LOCATION 333 Eel River Road JOB #B099-2533 SAMPLER David C. Bennett-Hydrogeologist, Kara Shumway-Environmental Scientist r ' Well Elev. of Total Depth to Standing Water Static Volume HNU Number reference Depth of Water Water Table Volume Purged PI-101 Comments point Well (Feet) Height Elevation (gallons) (gallons) (PP-) (fed) (fed) (feet) (feet) MW-1 17.34 20 16.26 4.82 1.08 .77 2 NA No odor,no sheen ' MW-2 17.07 20 16.04 3.96 - 1.03 .63 -2 NA No odor,no sheen MW-3 17.75 20 16.65 3.35 1.10 .54 2 NA No odor,no sheen NOTES: Gauge and sample all monitor wells. BENNETT'& O'REILLY, Inc. MONfTOR WELL SAMPLING LOG 1573 Main Street,P.O. Box 1667 Engineering and Environmental Services _ Brewster,MA 02631 (508)896-6630 CLIENT Birmingham DATE(S) 02/29/00 LOCATION 333 Eel River Road JOB # . B099-2533 SAMPLER David C. Bennett - LSP, Kara M. Shumway - ES ' MEASURING POINT T.O.C. Elev. of Total Standing Water Depth to Static Volume HNU Disolved Well reference Depth of Water Table Conductivity Temperature Number point Well Height Elevation (µS/cm Water Volume Purged PI-101 pH Oxygen ) Comments: (feet) (feet) (Feet) (feet) (feet) (gallons) (gallons) (ppm) (mg/L) (°F) MW-1 17.34 20- 16.23 3.7 1.1 1 .59 1.7 BDL 6.3 2.3 286 52 Light musty petroleum odor,no sheen MW-2 17.07 20 16.01 3.9 1.0 .62 1.8 BDL 6.6" 1.6 143 52 No odor,no sheen MW-3 17.75 20 16.62 3.3 ` 1.1 .54 1.6 BDL 6.5 .30 440 48 Septic odor,no sheen NOTES: Screen, gauge and sample all monitor wells. BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc, MONITOR WELL SAMPLING LOG 1573 Main Street,P.O.-Box 1667 Engineering and Environmental Services y Brewster,MA 02631 (508) 896-6630 CLIENT Birmingham DATE(S) 04/06/00 :LOCATION 333 Eel River Road JOB # . B099-2533 SAMPLER Kara M. Shumway ; MEASURING POINT T.O.C. Elev. of Total Standing Water Depth to Static Volume I-INU Disolved Well reference Depth of Water Table Conductivity Temperature Number point Wel Water Volume Purged PI-101 pH Oxygen Comments: l Height Elevation (µS/cm) (°F) (feet) (feet) (Feet) (feet) (feet) (gallons) (gallons) (PP-) (mg/L) MW-1 17.34 20 15.68 4.32 1.66 1 0.69 10+ BDL 7.0 0.0 182 51 Slight odor, no sheen MW-2 17.07 20 15.49 4.51 1.58 0.72 10+ BDL -7.0 0.1 109 51 Slight odor, no sheen MW-3 17.75 20 16.02 3.89 1.64 0.62 10+ BDL 6.4 0.0 268 51 Musty petroleum odor, no sheen SVE 1.0-1.8 NOTES: Gauge, screen and sample all monitor wells. r� it �r r rr �r rl r� r �r >• r �r�= Ir �r �r r r � BENNETT & REILLY, Inc. MONITOR WELL SAMPLING LOG 1573 Main Street,P.O. Box 1667 02631 En ineerm' and Environmental Services Brewster,MA 96-66 g g .. (508)896-6630 CLIENT Birmingham DATE(S) 05/11/00 LOCATION 333 Eel River Road JOB # B099-2533 SAMPLER David C. Bennett, Craig A. Sasse ' MEASURING POINT T.O.C. Elev. of Total Standing Water Depth to Static Volume HNU Dissolved Well reference Depth of Water. Conductivity Temperature Comments: Water' Volume Purged PI-101 pH Oxygen Number point Well Height Tabl Elevation (PS/cm) (oF) (feet) (feet)' (Feet) (feet) (feet) (gallons) (gallons) (pp-) (mg/L) MW-1 16.58 20 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A BDL N/A 0.3 N/A N/A No odor,No sheen MW-2 16.27 20 N/A' N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.4 N/A 1.3 N/A N/A Slight petroleum odor,no sheen MW-3 16.49 20 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A BDL N/A N/A N/A N/A Moderate odor,very It. sheen MW-4 15.39 20 " N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A Trace odor,no sheen W-5 16.37 20 N/A N/A ' N/A N/A N/A 0.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A No odor,No sheen M S VE 0.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NOTES: Inspection only. Install road boxes and run level loop to all wells. a� a� a� a aw as a� .a a■ a� ai � a-= a � � � a a� BENNETT & OREILLY, Inc. MONITOR WELL SAMPLING LOG 1573 Main Street,P.O. Box 1667 Engineering and Environmental Services Brewster, MA 0263.1 (508) 896-6630 CLIENT Birmingham DATE(S) 5/30/00 LOCATION 333 Eel River Rd. JOB # B099-2533 SAMPLER Kara M. Shumway - ES, Joel Perry - ET MEASURING POINT T.O.C. Elev. of Total Standing Water Depth to Static Volume HNU Disolved Well reference Depth of Water Table Conductivity Temperature Water Volume Purged PI-l01 pH Oxygen Comments: Number point Well Height Elevation (µS/cm) (°F) (feet) (feet) (Feet) (feet) (feet) (gallons) (gallons) (PP-) (mg/L) MW-1 16.58 20 14.60 5.40 1.98 0.86 2.5 BDL 6.7 2.6 366 52 No odor,no sheen MW-2 16.27 20 14.34 5.66 1.93 0.90 2.7 BDL 7.2 ' 3.8 142 52 Slight petroleum odor,no sheen MW-3 16.49 20 14.56 5.44 1.93 0.87 2:6 BDL 7.1 : 1.3 508 .52 No odor,no sheen MW-4 15.39 20 13.59 6AI 1.80 1.02 3.0 BDL 7.2 2.3 111 52 No odor,no sheen No odor,no sheen SVE NOTES: Gauge screen and sample all monitoring wells. BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. Sheet I of 2 ' 1573 Main Street PO Box 1667 508-896-6630 Brewster,MA 02631 . . 508-896-4687 Fax I ' a oopop Job Number: B099-2533 Date:5/11/00 Job Name: Birmingham/Eel River SAND GRAVEL SILT SAND PEAT Test Hole.Number: TB-12/MW-4 ' o Witness: David Bennett-Hydrogeologist ' ® ® Drilling Contractor: Jenkins Well Drilling ' TOP/SUB CLAY FILL Sampling Method: B-50 with 6"hollow auger,2"split spoon SOIL GEOLOGIC BOREHOLE LOG ' type Standard Penetrattan =f ell Lltfolo %Sediment .. b 9Y R umology Depth °f Depths. Btows:per %of r p w Sample x Speclficafion`& Remarks t„ Descnpfion Drive Recovery , A 0-3 N/A 100 PID Response TOPSOIL/SUBSOILR S 3-5 4-4-5-7 90. ' " (Ppm) o , ° 5 per WSC 94-400 SAND(SW): Tan to light red brown, o A 5-8 N/A 100 . S 8-10 3-3-10-12 50• medium to coarse gravelly,stratified, °' 10 poorly sorted,very clean with trace i S 10-12 3-4-5-6 80 fines. f— S 12-14 3-4-3-2 80 3-5 0 15 8-10 BDL SAND(BP):Off-white,fine,well _ 0 2-14 2 — o A 14-20 N/A 100 1 0:2 sorted,very clean.- 20 18-20 0.2 ' SAND(SW): Light grey to light red brown,medium to coarse gravelly, 25 poorly sorted,very clean 30 Water Encountered At: 14+/- 35 NOTES Set 2"flush joint PVC well with 10'of#10. screen at 20'. Sand pack t6 8'.and set 40 bentonite plug. ' 45 50 55 65 7 BENNETT & O°REILL i , Inc. Sheet 2 of 2 ' 1573 Main Street P 508-896-6630 O Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster, MA 02631 ' e 00000 Job Number: B099-2533 Date:5111/00 Job Name: Birmingham/Eel River SAND GRAVEL SILT SAND PEAT Test Hole Number: TB-13/MW-5 Witness: David Bennett-Hydrogeologist Drilling Contractor: Jenkins Well Drilling ' TOP/SUB CLAY FILL Sampling Method: B-50 with 6"hollow auger,2"split spoon SOIL t GEOLOGIC BOREHOLE LOG Type• Standard Penetration,of Llthology/Sediment -'gio1ow Depth sa pie.: Depth: ; Blows'per °i°of. Specification &:R'emarks w Description 'M 6"Drive Recovery' A 0-3 N/A 100 PID Response TOPSOIL/SUBSOIL S 3-5 4-5-8-9 NR (ppm) ` 5 per WSC 94-400 SAND(SW): Tan to light red brown, A 5-8 N/A 100 ' S 8-10 6-6-1-6 _ 10 medium to coarse with gravel,stratified, 0 10 very clean. A 10-13 N/A 100 ' S 13-15 4-5-8-8 80 SAND: Light gray,fine,well sorted, • I 15 very clean. t! — 3-5 0.2 A I5-20 N/A 100 8-10 0.2 SAND SW Light gray g 20 13=15 0 8 ' ( ): Li t era to light red brown,medium to coarse gravelly, i weakly to non stratified poorly sorted, f 25 very clean. 30 . ' Water Encountered At: 14.5+/- 35 NOTES - i Set 2"flush joint PVC well with 10'of#10 , 40 screen at 20'. Sand pack to 8'and set' i ' bentonite plug. 45 50 ' 60 ' 65 70 BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inca REPORT NUMBER: I 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 ' PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: B099-2533 Date- 02/07/00 Job Name: Birmingham Residence Feature: Release Abatement Measure Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. Type of Work: Assessment/Monitoring Weather Conditions: Sunny,cool Temperature: OF Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) . BENNETT&O'REILLY, INC.: David C. Bennett-L.S.P.,Kara Shumway-E.S. Equipment irruse or idled(identify which) ' 3"bucket hand auger,HNU photoionization detector unit ' Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed None Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies None Summary of construction activities ' 2:30PM BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.personnel arrive at site. Bruce MacAllister on site. Discuss area of overdig(25'xl 7'x6'(D)). Approximately 60 yards of clean overburden being stored at MacAllister property. 2:48PM Begin HB-10 north of tank grave at 6'below grade. Collect 2'soil samples to 16'. Field screen headspace as follows: HB-10: 6-8' Trace 12-14' 1.8ppm 8-10' BDL 14-16' 10.4ppm ' 10-12' 0.2ppm 3:20PM Begin HB-I I east of tank grave at 6'below grade. Collect 2'soil samples to 16'. Screen headspace as. follows: HB-11: 6-8' Trace 12-14' 2.6 8-10' 0.4ppm 14-16' 18.2 10-12' 0.2ppm 4:OOPM Conduct Petroleum'FLAG Hydrocarbon analyses on HB-10:6'-16'and HB-11:6'-16'as follows: HB-10: 6-16' 120 ppm HB-11: 6-16' 1332 ppm ' 4:35PM Two tape hand boring locations. Stake corners of excavation to facilitate the placement of shoring. 4:50PM Secure area. Leave site at 5:10 pm. t BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. REPORT NUMBER:12 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-8964687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS ' Job Number. B099-2533 Date: 2/10/00 Job Name: Birmingham Residence ' Feature: Release Abatement Measure[RTN4-15283] Contractor: BENNETT&OREILLY,INC.,EnviroSafe,Corp,Shoreline Construction Type of Work: Soil Removal Weather Conditions: Sunny,cool Temperature: 40 Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) ' BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.:David C.Bennett-LSP,Kara Shumway-ES;EnviroSafe:Foreman,laborer, Shoreline Construction:Bruce McAllister,laborer Equipment in.use or idled(identify which) Groundwater gauge,HNU photoionization detector Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed 5 EPH with targets(soil), 1 Deisel Range Organics(DRO)(soil),3 Standard Wet Chemistry analyses Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies None ' Summary ryof construction onactivities 8:00am ' BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC,arrive at site. Met by EnviroSafe,Corp.Shoreline Construction,Robert Our Company. Note shoring in place at extent of proposed excavation. 8:01am- 11:00am ' Remove impacted soil from within the excavation. Fill and release six truck loads. Break for lunch at 11:30am. 12:00pm Create sump at westem comer of excavation to de-water hole. Use vac-truck to evacuate accumulated impacted groundwater. Remove capillary fringe soils to 16'. 12:50pm-1:30pm Collect bottom of hole(BOH)and sidewall samples and field screen. 1:30pm-3:30pm Continue to allow impacted groundwter to accumulate and evacuate significantly reducing sheen. Add 60 ' gallons of Oxygen Release Compound(ORC)to BOH. Conduct groundwater gauging at all monitor wells. Secure area. Leave site. [See Supplemental Log for detail]. Y 1 INSPECTOR'S DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS SUPPLEMENTAL LOG ' 02/10/00 ' 8:00 am BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. personnel arrive at site. Inspect shoring placed by Robert Our Co.. Met by Enviro-Safe, Corp. (one foreman, one laborer), Shoreline Construction (Bruce McAllister),and Robert Our Co.(two laborers). One truck load released upon arrival. Waiting for arrival of Truck 92. " 8:05 am BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.initiate pump test at MW-2. Complete three rounds ofpump test. Collect sample for standard wet chemical analysis to establish baseline criteria for ' monitoring nutrient impact. R' 8:40 am ' Truck 92 arrives. Continue with excavation`within shored area. Begin sampling MW-3 for standard wet chemical analysis. ' 9:00 am ' Release Truck#2. Loading Truck#3 below 10'within sheet pile shoring. Release Truck#3. 9:30 am ' t Truck#4 arrives at site. Continue.with soil excavation 1 w below 10'. Release Truck#4. ' 10:00 am Purge and sample MW=1 for standard wet chemical analysis. Waiting for Truck#5. Truck #5 arrives, continue excavation below 11'. 10:35 am Release Truck#5. Truck#6 arrives. Continue excavation without incident. 1 FEBRUARY 10,2000 BII2MINGHAM/3099-2533 PAGE 2 OF 3 SUPPLEMENTAL FIELD LOG 11:00 am ' Release Truck #6. Truck #7 arrives. Continue with excavation below 12'. Note groundwater at approximately 15'. Collect BOH sample and run Petro FLAG TPH analysis as follows: Location Depth Petro FLAG BOH 15-16' 61 11:30 am Break for lunch 12:00 pm ' Instruct excavator to create sump at western corner of excavation to de-water BOH. Mobilize vac-truck to evacuate impacted groundwater from excavation. Remove capillary, ' fringe soils from 15-16'. 12:50 pm ' Instruct excavator to skim BOH through capillary fringe. Collect BOH sample at 16'. Run sample for PetroFLAG analysis. Release Truck#7& 8. Location Depth HNU Petro FLAG SW-N 6'-15' 5.4 463 SW-W 6'-15' 13.2 error>1000 SW-S 6'-15' 0.4 N/A SW-E 6'-15' 1.0 N/A ; 1 1:30 m " . P iAllow groundwater to collect within sump area and utilize vac-truck once again to evacuate impacted groundwater,significantly reducing sheen. Final count on soil weight slips indicates 170-180 tons received at Bardon Trimount. FEBRUARY 10,2000 BIItMINGHAM/B099-2533 PAGE 3 OF 3 SUPPLEMENTAL FIELD LOG 2:30 pm ' Add 60 gallons of Oxygen Release Compound (ORC) to BOH. Mix with soil and groundwater in bottom of excavation. ' 2:50 pm BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.personnel transported to McAllister's facility to collect clean overburden sample. ' 3:00 pm Conduct last round of groundwater gauging for high tide cycle. Secure area with fencing and ' tape. Collect paperwork on amount of groundwater evacuated by vac-truck(1,494 gallons). 3:30 pm Leave site BENNETT & OTEILLY, Inc. REPORT NUMBER: 3 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 ' PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 ' INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 2/16/00 ' Job Name: Birmingham Residence Feature: Release Abatement Measure(RTN 4-15283) Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.,EnviroSafe,Corp. ' Type of Work: Inspection Weather Conditions: Overcast Temperature: 35F r Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification, including Subcontractor personnel) BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.:Kara Shumway-E.S.,Craig Sasse-E.S. II Enviro-Safe Corp.:Nick Christiani and laborer, Shoreline Construction: Bruce McAllister ' Equipment in use or idled(identify which) Backhoe Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed 4"PCV Soil Ya or Extractions stem P Y ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies Water at dwelling disconnected,unable to add nutrient solution. Summary of construction activities ' 10:00 am BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.,personnel arrive at site. Met by Enviro-Safe Corp.( I laborer). Inspect ' excavation. Partially filled above static water level with gravel. Waiting on next load. Review SVE installation. Leave site at 10:50 am. 12:50 pm ' BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.,return to site. Gravel backfilled above SVE,with silt cloth cover,2 sample ports installed,located as required by excavation contractor for septic component placement. Note excavator backfilling with clean sand. Nutrient addition postponed due to lack of water. Will_contact Jaxtimer to connect ' water. Leave site at 1:10 pm. BENNETT & 01REILLY Inc. REPORT NUMBER: 4 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 ' PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 ' INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 2/17//00 Job Name: Birmingham Residence Feature: Release Abatement Measure(RTN 4-15283) Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. ' Type of Work: Operation and Maintenance Weather Conditions: Partly cloudy,It.breeze Temperature: 20F Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) Craig Sasse-Environmental Scientist II, ' Equipment in use or idled(identify which) SVE system,soil sample ports ' Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed - Nutrient solution ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies Excavation open, SVE not constructed above grade,pending septic component installation. Summary of construction activities ' 4:15 pm. ' Bennett&O'Reilly Inc.arrive at site. Use 12 volt pump at MW-1. Use water from well to generate a nutrient solution(75 gallons+/-)introduced at SVE vent pipe. Note shoring removed and area of excavation partially backfilled in preparation for installation of SDS. 4:30 pm. ' Begin injecting 5 gallon batches of solution. 5:20 pm. Inject total of 75 gallons+/-of nutrients and flush with 20 gallons clear water. Decontaminate equipment, secure site and leave at 5:40 pm. I BENNET T & OIREILLY Inc. . REPORT NUMBER: 5 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 ' PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 2/29/00 ' Job Name: Birmingham Residence Feature: RAM(RTN 4-15283) Contractor: BENNETT&UREILLY,INC. ' Type of Work: Assessment Weather Conditions: Cloudy,cool Temperature: 35F ' Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.-David C.Bennett-LSP,Kara Shumway-Environmental Scientist ' Equipment in-use or idled(identify which) SVE system,turbine vent,HNU Photoionization detector,conductivity/temperature/PH meter,DO meter. ' Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed 3 EPH with taget samples,3 plastic bailers. ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies SVE vent constructed above ground,connected to turbine vent above roof line. e Summary of construction activities 10:15 am. ' Bennett&O'Reilly Inc.personnel arrive at site. Begin screening and sampling MW's 1,2,and 3. 11:15 am. Leave site. BENNETT & O'REILLY, InC. IREPORTNUMBER:1 6 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 ' PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 04/06/00 ' Job Name: Birmingham Residence Feature: Release Abatement Measure(RTN 4-15283) Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. Type of Work: Assessment Weather Conditions: Partly cloudy,cool Temperature: 40F r Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification, including Subcontractor personnel) BENNETT&O'REILLY, INC.-Kara Shumway E.S.,David Bennett,P.G.,C.G.W.P. ' Equipment in use or idled(identify which) SVE system,turbine vent,HNU photoionization detector,conductivity/temperature/pH meter,DO meter,2" submersible whale pump. Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed 3 EPH with PAH's. ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems, inspections of previously reported deficiencies None. Summary of construction activities 9:45 am BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.personnel arrive at site. Begin gauging and screening all monitor wells. 10:05 am Use 2"submersible pump to purge monitor wells and sample for EPH analysis. t 11:15 am Screen SVE with HNU(1.0-1.8 ppm);add25 gallons of standard nutrient solution to SVE port. 11:30 am Complete sampling wells; leave site. f BENNETT & OTMILLY, Inc., I REPORTNUMLER: 7 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 ' PO Box 1667 . 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster, MA 02631 ' INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 05/11/00 ' Job Name: Birmingham Residence Feature: Release Abatement Measure(RTN 4-15283) Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC./JENKINS WELL DRILLING ' Type of Work: Inspection/Supplemental Assessment/ORC reapplication Weather Conditions: Overcast,mild,windy, Temperature: 50-55F Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) BENNETT&O'REILLY, INC.: David Bennett-.H.G.,L.S.P.,Craig Sasse-Environmental Scientist II; JENKINS WELL DRILLING: David Jenkins-Driller ' Equipment in-use or idled(identify which) B-50 drilling rig,HNU P1 101 photoionization detector,temperature/conductivity/pH meter,Solonist water meter,dissolved oxygen meter Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed 2-20'monitor,wells with split spoon soil samples,plugs,caps,bailers,manholes(6 ea.), 120 lbs.ORC remedial additive ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies DO meter erratic after testing MW-1 and MW-2,unable to check remaining wells. t Summary of construction activities ' 9:30 am BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC.personnel arrive at site and met by drilling contractor. Review access for proposed well locations. Begin test boring TB-12/MW7.4(DB)and inspection of wells and SVE biovent system. (See Borehole Logs and Monitor Well Sampling Log) t 10:45 am Complete TB-12 and field photoionization screening of soil samples. Note trace petroleum odor in cuttings but no significant TOV(<1.0 ppm)measured.._Relocate rig to advance TB-13/MW-5. Recomplete ' existing monitor wells below grade in 8"manholes. Construct MW-4. 12:00 pm Complete TB713 and field photoionization testing of soil samples with no significant TOV measured (<1.0 ppm). Construct MW-5 and complete remaining wells below grade. Conduct field screening of monitor wells. Mix 120 lbs.of ORC with 200 gal.of water and nutrients and reinject into UST grave via SVE manifold. ' 1:30 pm Break for lunch - ' 2:00 pm Run level loop through all newly completed monitor wells to re-establish vertical datum for top of casing elevations. ' 3:00 pm Clean up and leave site. i BENNETT & OMEILLY Inc. I REPORT NUMBER: 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 ' PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 5/30//00 Job Name: Birmingham Residence Feature: Release Abatement Measure(RTN 4-15283) Contractor: BENNETT&O'REILLY,INC. Type of Work: Inspection,Assessment Weather Conditions: Sunny Temperature: 58F Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) BENNETT&O'REILLY, INC.:Kara Shumway-Environmental Scientist I, Joel Perry-Environmental Technician ' Equipment in use or idled(identify which) HNU PI- 101 Photoionization detector,DO meter,pH/conductivity/temperature meter,Solonist water gauge, SVE system. Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed 1 bailer,5EPH samples,3 wet chemistry with heterotrophic bacteria. Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies None Summary of construction activities 9:00 am Bennett&O'Reilly Inc.personnel arrive at site. Locate new monitor wells(MW-4 and MW-5). 10:15 am Begin screening and sampling all wells. Replace bailer at MW-3. 12:30 m Leave site. P BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. Sheet 1 of 2 t1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 BOREHOLE PERMEABILITY TEST Variable-head.Test ' Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 2/10/00 Test Hole Number: MW-2 - Job Name: Birmingham Residence Witness: David C.Bennett-Hydrogeologist,Kara Shumway-Environmental Scientist Casing Inside Diameter: 2" Ground Elevation. 18-20' Reference Elevation(TOC): 17.07 Falling Head Rising Head 0 ' Aquifer Saturated Thickness Confined): Q � ) ' Well Screen Length: 10' Length of Test Section: 4.07' Depth of Groundwater Table(H): 15.93' Depth of Top of Test Section(B): 10' Type of Material"in Test Zone: Sand,very clean,medium grain Notes(time,pump rate,tide,etc.): Conduct pump test at 8:00am.Use 2"submersible 12 volt pump. ELAPSED WATER ACTIVE -i 2r 1-- TIME TIME h/Ho DEPTH HEAD ' T (seconds) r(X) (h) I T-1 0.00 1.00 16.32 0.39 ;fie{ 1 X 8:05am 1.44 0.69 16.20 0.27 M. 1.68 0.56 16.15 0:22 B - f 2.71 0.44 16.10 0.17 {u" 3.31 0.31 16.05 . 0.12 STAIC A 2= �L 6.19 0.18 .16.00 0.07 .::.. 41.34 0.05 15.95 0A2 _. 1pq 0.00 1.0 16.32 0.39 T-2 1.37 0.69 16.20 0.27 .y.9,u .... L 8:15am 1.83 0.56 16.15 0.22 -I 2R F- - 2.44. .0.44 16.10 0.17 - 2.87 0.31 16.05 0.12 h=H-X(Falling Head)or 6.28 0.18 16.00 0.07 h=X-H(Rising head) 46.77 0.10 15.97 0.04" Ho=H-Xo(Falling Head)or ' Ho=Xo-H(Rising Head) Xo=Xatt=0 A,B,H&L are defined above. i BENNETT & O'REILLY, Inc. Sheet 2 of 2 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 BOREHOLE PERMEABILITY TEST Variable-head Test ' Job Number: B099-2533 Date: 2/10/00 Test Hole Number: MW-2 Job Name: Birmingham Residence Witness: David C. Bennett-Hydrogeologist,Kara Shumway-Environmental Scientist . ' Casing Inside Diameter: 2" Ground Elevation: 18-20' Reference Elevation(TOC): 17.07 Falling Head El Rising Head M I ' Aquifer Saturated Thickness Confined): r ' Well Screen Length: 10' Length of Test Section: 4.07 Depth of Groundwater Table(H): 15.93 Depth of Top of Test Section(B): '10. ' Type of Material in Test Zone: Sand,very clean,medium grain Notes(time,pump rate,tide,etc.): ' Conduct pump test at 8:00am. Use 2"submersible pump. ELAPSED WATER ACTIVE -I 2r 1-- TIME TIME hMo DEPTH HEAD ' T (seconds) W (h) ,mz I T-3 0.00 1.0 16.32 0.36 . 8:30am 1.24 069 Tk z X 16.20 0.27 , H 2.00 . 0.56 16.15 0.22 2.47 0.44 16.10 0.17 fy4EiK4.i� Y 3.10 0.31 16.05 0.12 A M O, `"x'''al SrAnC 5.31 0.18 16.00 0.07 21.56 0.12 15.98 0.05 L 4 -1 2R 1-- h=H-X(Falling Head)or h=X-H(Rising head) Ho=H-Xo(Falling Head)or R ' Ho=Xo-H(Rising Head) Xo=Xatt=0 A,B,H&L are defined above. t t <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A Q T E S 0 L V R E S U L T S Version 2 . 01 Developed by Glenn M. Duffield (c) 1988-1995 Geraghty & Miller, Inc . J02/25/00 11 :52 :56 ' TEST DESCRIPTION Data set . . . . . . . . . . . BIRMI.DAT ' Output file. . . . . . . . BIRMI .OUT Data set title. . . . . Birmingham Residence , Company. . . . . . . . . . . . BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. " Project . . . . . . . . . . . . B099-2533 Client . . . . . . . . . . . . . Birmingham Residence Location. . . . . . . . . . . 333 Eel River Road Test date. . . . . . . . . . 2/10/00 'Test well . MW-2 a Obs . well . . . . . . . . . . MW-2 Unit f s o Measurement Length. . . . . . . . . . ft Time. . . . . . . . . . . . sec 'Test Well Data r Initial displacement in well . .. . . 0 .39 Radius of well casing. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 167 ' Radius of wellbore. . . . . . . . . . 0 .5 Aquifer saturated thickness . . . . . . 20 Well screen length. . . . . . . . . . . 10 Static height of water in well . . . 4 .07 Gravel pack porosity. . . . . . . . . . . 0 .3 Effective well casing radius . . . . . 0 .3074. Effective wellbore radius . . . . . . . . 0 .5 ' Log(Re/lbw) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 1 .448 Constants A, B and C. . ... . . . . . . . . .. 2 . 150 0 .337, 0 .000 No. of observations . . . . . . . . . ... . 6 - ANALYTICAL METHOD lBouwer-Rice (Unconfined Aquifer Slug Test) RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING 9. STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES Estimate Std. Error K = 1 .9580E+002 +/- 3 .2871E+001 ft/day ' y0 = 4 . 0864E-001 +/- 4-.9348E-002 ft ALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS 'residual = observed - calculated weighted residual = residual * weight ,Weighted Residual Statistics : Number of residuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Number of estimated parameters . . . . 2 Degrees of freedom.. . . . _ _ . . ... . . . . . . 4 Residual mean. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 0 .004362 Residual standard deviation. . . . . ... 0 .0191 - Residual variance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 0 .0003647 Model Residuals : Time Observed Calculated Residual Y Weight ------------- -------- --- ------------- ------------- -------=- 1 .44 0 .27 0 .25368 0 . 016316 1 1 .68 0 .22 10 .23431 -0 . 014307 1 2 .71 0 .17 0 .1666 0 . 0033952 1 3 .31 0 .12 0 . 13659 0 .01659 1 6 . 19 0 .07 0 .052641 0 . 017359 1 ' �1 .34 0 . 02 4 .6488E-007 0 . 02 1 ««r.«««««««««««««««<««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»;»»»»> ' CLIENT: Bk-minghatimidence COMPANY: BENNETT 14'REILM INC. ` ' LOCATION: 3 -LGl Rfiner -Road PROJECT: 1097-333 B i rim i rg .a . s i-denCe DATA SET: AIRMI..DAT 1. 02/25/00 ' AQUIFER--.MODEL: Unconfined SOLU.TI.ON METHOD- Bouwer-Rice PROJECT DATA ' ++ test date: 2/10/00. test well: HU-2 ++ ohs. well: MW-2 a� � 0.1 TEST DATA: u H0= 0.39 ft rc= 0.167 ft rw= 0.5 ft a L = 10. ft h = 20. ft H = 4.07 ft ' t PARAMETER- ESTIMATES K- = 195.0 f.t/day y0 = 0-.4006.f_t 0..01 .0. -1-0. 20. 30. 40. 50. Time. tsecl AQTESOLU A Q T E S 0 L V R E S U L T S Version 2 . 01 ' Developed by Glenn M. Duffield (c) 1988-1995 Geraghty & Miller, Inc . 102/25/00 12 :07 :32 TEST DESCRIPTION . Data set . . . . . . . . . . . BIRM2 .DAT 'Output file. . . . . . . . BIRM2 .OUT Data set title. . . . . Birmingham Residence Company. . . . . . . . . . . . BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. lProject • . • . • . . . • • • . B099-2533 Client . Birmingham Residence Location. . . . . . . . . . . 333 Eel River Road fest date. . . . . . . . . . 2/10/00 est well . . . . . . . . . MW-2 bs . well . . . . . . . . . . MW-2 'Units of Measurement Length. . . . . . . . . . ft Time . . . . . . . . . . . . sec 'Test Well Data Initial displacement in well . . . . . 0'.39 Radius of well casing. . . . . . . . . . 0 .167 <; ' Radius of wellbore. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 .5 Aquifer saturated thickness . . . . . . 20 Well screen length. . . . . . . . .. . . . . �10 ' Static height of water in well . . ,. 4 . 07 Gravel pack porosity. . ,. 0 .3 Effective well casing radius . . . . . 0 .3074 Effective wellbore radius . . . . . . . 0 .5 Log(Re/Rw) 1 .448 Constants A, B and C. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 .150 0 .337, 0 . 000 No. of observations . . . . . . . ... . . . '6 ANALYTICAL METHOD JBouwer-Rice (Unconfined Aquifer Slug Test) RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING ,STATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES Estimate Std. Error ' K = 2 .2799E+002 +/- 6 . 1996E+001 ft/day y0 = 4 .4133E-001 +/ 9 .3977E-002 ft JANALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS residual = observed - calculated weighted residual = residual * weight Weighted Residual Statistics : ' Number of residuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Number of estimated parameters . ... . 2 Degrees of freedom. . . . . . . . . . 4 ' Residual mean. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 .009052 Residual standard deviation. . . . . . . 0 .02884 Residual variance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 .0008318 Model Residuals: Time Observed Calculated Residual Weight ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- 1 .37 0 .27 0 .26026 0 . 0097447 1 1 .83 0.22 0 .21796 0 . 0020352 1 2 .44 0 .17 0 .17229 -0 . 00229 1 2 . 87 0 .12 0 .14597 -0 . 025972 1 6 .28 0 . 07 0 . 039207 0 .030793 1 . ' 46 .77 0 .04 6 .5242E-009 . 0 . 04 1 t 1 ' CLIENT: Birmingham Reslduce COMPANY: BENNETT a 4'REILLY, INC. LOCATION: 333 Eel River Road PROJECT: BV 9-2533 1 B i rm i nghdm Residence ' DATA SET: BIRM2.DAT 1• 02/25/00 ' AQUIFER MODEL: Unconfined ' SOLUTION METHOD Bouwer-Rice T PROJECT DATA: ' ++ test date 2/10i00 test well: MU-2 ++ ohs. well: MW-2 a� c 0.1 TEST DATA: u HO= 0.39 ft rc= 0.167 ft ' •� rw 0.5 ft a L = 10. ft h = 20. ft H = 4.07ft PARAMETER ESTIMATES: K = 228. ft/day yO = 0.4413 ft ' 0.01 0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50. ' .Time (sec) 0QTESOLV • ' <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A Q T E S 0 L V R E S U L T S Version 2 . 01 Developed by Glenn M. Duffield (c) 1988-1995 Geraghty & Miller, Inc . ' 02/25/00 12 :12 :09 ' TEST DESCRIPTION Data set . . . . . . . . . . . BIRM3 .DAT Output file. . . . . . . . BIRM3 .OUT Data set title. . . . . Birmingham Residence , Company. . . . . . . . . . . . BENNETT & O'REILLY, INC. 'Project . . . . . . . . . . . . B099-2533 Client . . . . . . . . . . . . . Birmingham Residence Location. . . . . . . . . . . 333 Eel River Road fest date. . . . . . . . . . 2/10/00 est well . . . . . . . . .. MW-2 bs . well . . . . . . . . . . MW-2 Units-- of Measurement Length. . . . . . . . . . ft Time . . . . . . . . . . . . sec 'Test Well Data Initial displacement in well . . . . . 0 .39 Radius of well casing. . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 167 ' Radius of wellbore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 .5 Aquifer saturated thickness . . . . . . 20 Well screen length. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 ' Static height of water in well : : : 4 .07 Gravel pack porosity. 0 .3 Effective well casing radius . . . . . 0 .3074 ' Effective wellbore radius . . . . . . 0 .5 Log(Re/R?a) 1 .448 Constants A, B and C. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . 150 0 .337, 0 . 000 No. of observations . . . . . . . . . . . 6 ANALYTICAL METHOD JBouwer-Rice (Unconfined Aquifer Slug. Test) ' _____________________-___________________________________ RESULTS FROM STATISTICAL CURVE MATCHING ITATISTICAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES Estimate Std. Error ' K = 2 .2002E+002 +/- 4 . 9723E+001 ft/day y0 = 4 .3292E-001 +/- 7 .6152E-002 ft I[NALYSIS OF MODEL RESIDUALS 'residual = observed - calculated weighted residual = residual * weight Weighted Residual Statistics : ' Number of residuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Number of estimated parameters. . . . 2 Degrees of freedom. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ' Residual mean. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 008637 Residual standard deviation. 0 .02776 Residual variance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 0007704 Model Residuals : Time Observed Calculated " Residual . Weight ------------- ------------- ------------- --=---------- ---- ------- 1 .24 0 .27 0 .27294 -0 . 0029357 1 2 0 .22 0 .20572 0 . 014285 1 2 .47 0 .17 0 .17271 -0 . 0027146 1 3 .1 0 .12 0 .13663 0 . 016628 l 5 .31 0 . 07 0 . 060044 0 . 009956_ 1 ' 21 .56 0 . 05 0 .00014222 0 . 049858 1 RESULTS FROM VISUAL CURVE MATCHING 'VISUAL MATCH PARAMETER ESTIMATES Estimate K = 2 .2002E+002 ft/day ' y0 = 4 .3292E-001 ft " CLIENT: Birmingham Residence COMPANY: BENNETT I B'REILLY, INC. LOCATION: 333 Eel River Road PROJECT: B099-2533 B i rm i nghdm Residence ' DATA SET: BIRM3.DAT 1• 02/25/00 AQUIFER MODEL: Unconfined ' SOLUTION METHOD: Bouuer-Rice T PROJECT DATA: ' test date: 2/10i00 ., test well: MU-2 ++ abs. well: MU-2 n u 0,1 TEST DATA: as u H0= 0.39 f t rc= 0.167 f t rw 0.5 f t a L. = 10. ft b = 20. f t H = 4.07ft t PARAMETER ESTIMATES: X = 220. ft/day yO = 0.4329 f t 0. 10. 20. ' 30. 40. 50. ' Time (sec) AQTESOLU r SOLUTE TRANSPORT/TRVIE OF TRAVEL CALCULATIONS Hydraulic Conductivity(K) 214.6 feet per day(') Hydraulic n =y Gradient (I� H hL/L ' H(MW-2 to MW-3) =0.03/30 feet H=1.00 x 10-3 feet/feet y Groundwater Velocity(V) V=(K)(Ii)/porosity iV=(214.6 ft/day)(1.00 x 10-3 ft/ft) 0.25* ' V=0.85 ft/day ' Travel Time Release area to MW-3= 18ft 18ft x .85 ft/day= 15 days ' Dissolved Phase Transport Time From Release Area to MW-3 with Retardation(R)=20% Release area to MW-3=15 days ' 15 days x .20 (R) = 18 days Soil removal w/ORC application=February 10, 2000 Time of Travel to MW-3 =February 28, 2000 Calculated by : Kara Shumway, Environmental Scientist Checked by: David C. Bennett, Hydrogeologist 1 -Averaged Hydraulic Conductivity(K)calculated based on Bouwer-Rice(Unconfined Aquifer Slug Test)analytical methos (AQTESOLV©1988-1994 Geraghty&Miller,Inc.) ' *Porosity value obtained from Heath-Basic Ground-water Hydrology-U.S.Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2220, 1991 1 1 � APPENDIX C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C- d�® FEB 2. 9 2000 { ' February15 2000 ° BARDON ' TRIMOUNT HEATHER ATWOOD ENVIRO-SAFE CORP. ' P.O. BOX 810 EAST SANDWICH, MA 02537 Re: Soil, Birmingham Residence ' 333 Eel River Road Osterville, MA Release Tracking #:_4-15283 Recyclable soil from the above address was received'y at our facility on February 10,, 2000. Attached is the shipper's log of soil receipts totaling 185.7:tons along with the ' Bill of Lading and other receipt documentation. I , We will issue a "Certificate of Recycling upon request after processing. Thank you for recycling soil at our So. Dennis facility. Yours truly, > 11 David M. Peter ' General Manager Environmental Services ' BARDON TRIMOUNT, INC. 1101 Turnpike Street Stoughton,Massachusetts 02072 ' Telephone 781 344 1100 Facsimile 781 341 5523 Environmental Services Telephone 781 341 5500 ' Facsimile 781 341 2440 An AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES Company FEB-08-00 09 : 18 AM BENNET&O'REILLY_INC. 508+896+4687 P. 05 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EWSC-012A Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup ' Aetaa:�TractimQ rvun,ear�: BILL OF LADING (taunuant to 310 CMR 40.0030) ' A. LOCATION OF SITE OR DISPOSAL SITE WHERE REMEDIATION WASTE WAS GENERATED: Release Name(optional); Sirminghdm Residence ' street: 333 Eel River Road Location Aid: Map 115 r Parcel 2 . city/Town: _ Osterville zip Code: 02665 — 0000_ Date/Period of Generation: 1 / S / 00 to 1 / 7 /QO Additional Release Tracking Numbers Associated with this Bill of Lading: *Moto: If this Bill of Lading/s the result of a Lirnited Remova/Action(LRA) taken prior to Notification, a Release Tracking Number is not.needed. 0. PERSON CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH BILL OF LADING: Name of Organization: t Name of Contact: F .J . Jaxt i m r — Title: P r n p e r t y m a n a g e r street: 333 Eel River Road City/Town: O a t e r v i l l e State: _- MA Zip Code: 0 6 — 0000 Taisphone: 508 — 778 — 4911 Ext. C, RELATIONSHIP TO RELEASE OR THREAT OF AV-LEASE OF PERSON CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH BILL OF LADING: ' (aeck one/specify) RP Specify(circle one): Owner Operator Generator Transporter Other RP: ❑ PRP Specify(circle one): Owner Operator Generator Transporter Other PRP: C] Fiduciary/Secured Lender ❑ Agency/Public Utility on a Right of Way C1 Other Person: ' If an owner and/or operator is not conducting the response action associated with the Bill at Lading,provide on an attachment the name. contact person,address and telephone number,Including'any area code and extension,for each,if known. D; TRANSPORTER(COMMON CARRIER INFORMATION: ' Transporter/Common Carrier Name: E n y i r o S a f e Corp . r j Contact Person: Heather Atwood Title: President Street P.O . Box 810 CAy/Tcwn: East Sandwich State: MA Zip Code: 02637 _ - 0000 ' Telephone: 5 0 8 — 8 8 8 - 5 4 7 8 Ext. ' E, RECEIVING FACILITY/TEMPORARY STORAGE LOCATION: ` Operator/FacilityName- Bardon Trimount , Inc.. Contact Person: David M. Peter rtle:Gen . Mgr. Env . Services Street: 230 Great Western Road ' Cily(Town: South Dennis State: MA' ZlpCode: 02660 _ 0000 Telephone. 781 - 341 - 5500 EA Type of Facility: ® Asphalt Batch/Cold Mix ❑ Landtill/Cisposal ❑ incinerator (check one) ® Asphalt Batch/Hot Mix ❑ Landfill/Daily Cover ❑ Temporary Storage ❑ Thermal Processing ❑ Landfill/Structural Fill ❑ Other: ' Division of riazarcous Division of Solid waste MAD985286384 Waste/Class A Permit 0: S-9 5-0 4 2 Management Permit a: EPA identiricatlon M: Actual/Anticipated Period of Temporary Storage(speciy Gates if applicable): ._ /_ /_ to Reason for Temporary Storage(it applicable) i --ievisea 10/1/93 rhis form is pnnreo on recycled paper. Page 1 cf r FEE-08-00 09 : 18 "IM BENNET&O'REILLY—INC. 508+896+4687 P. 06 ' Massachusetts Dep artment of Environmental Protection 6WSC-012A Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup ' I Aeieeae iracwnp Numom: I GILL OF LADING (pursuant to 310 CMA 40.0030) ' E. RECEIVING.FACILITYITEMPORARY STORAGE LOCATION (continued): Temporary Storage Address: Street: ' Ciiy/Town; State: — Zip Code: F. DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIATION WASTE:. (check all that apply) Q Contaminated Media(circle all that apply): GDGroundwater Surface Watery Other. ❑ Contaminated Debris(circle all that apply): Demolltion/Construction Waste Vegetation/Organic Materials Inorganic Abscrbant Materials Other. Cl❑ Null-hiuwuuua Unconw,nerize6 Waste(circle all that apply): Non-aquecue Phase Liquia Other: Cl Ncn•hazardous Containerized Waste(c:rc!e all that apply): Tank Bosoms/Sludges Ccntairers Drums_ Engiflowod Impounomento Otner: ' Type of Contamination(circle all that apply); Gasoline Diesel Fuel #2 Oil as Oil e6 Oil Waste 0-1 Kerosene Jet Fuel Other t ,Estimated Vclume of Materials: Cubic Yards: 100+ — 1 o s: 150+�— Other: ' U`ontaminanl Source(check one/specify): ❑ Transportation Accident M Underground Storage Tank ❑Other: Response Action Associated with Bill of Lading(circle one): immediate Resoonse' Actiornd elease Abatement Measure,Ulillty-Related Abatement Measure Limited Removal Action(LRA) 1� Lnmprehensive esponse clion Other(specify): `CD liemediation Waste Characterization Support Documentation attached: ® Site History Information : ] Sampling and Analytical Methods and Procadures ® Laboratory Data Field Screening Data 11 supporting documentation is not appended, provide' an attachment stating the date and in connection with what document such information was previously submitted to DEP, ' 0. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL (LSP) OPINION: Blame of Organization: BENNETT � O ' EtEILLY, INC . LSP Name: _hzvi,d C. Bennett Tige: Director Of En-V., Services Telsphcne; r 5(1 A — q q 1; —_6 630 Ext. !have personally examined and am familiar with the information cnntained on and submitted with ``Ns torm.,.JB,Aned on this Infmmation it is my Qpinion that the testing and assessment actions undertaken were adegliale to characterize IWAA t fpi ..n V�/aple,in accordenca with 310 ' CMR d0.0030, the f or location can accept remediation wastes with the charaCteji. his submittal. I am aware That significant enaltic in t not limited to. possible fines and imprisonment may ropy ' I�Ihi �u Ur�lo;malion which l know to be false,inaccu le, ten c plate. C. ` ..► Signature: S'e• SENNETT H //�� No.4303 Date: ��'1 +\�E`y qF ep i s CrsTea ��i� License Number: H. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BILL OF LADING I.cenity under penalties of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal,including any no ail documents accompanying this ceniflcmion,and that,based on my inquiry of there individuals immediately reepcnaible for obtaining m Xe information,the material information contained herein is,to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. la aware ' at there are significant penalties,Including, but not limited to, possibifir, and Imprisonment, for wiilutly.submitting false, inaccurate,or Ihcomplele' ion. \Signature: W Date: �� tame of Person(print), Re Ised 1011/93 This form is printea on recycled paper. Page 2 of.2 r Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection MS3C-012C Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup RNeaie 7rackJr�Fkmber: 61LL OF LADING(Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0030) ' -SUMMARY SHEET t' of K. SUMMARY OF SHIPMENTS: ' DATE OF SHIPMENT: DATE OF RECEIPT: NUMBER OF LOADS SHIPPED: DAILY VOLUME SHIPPED(CU.YD JfONS): --------------- - -=i�_U U - -------------I? ------------ ----- ----- ' --------------- --------------- --------------------------- ---------------------=------- --------------- --------------- ---------------------------- --------------------------- --------------- --------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- -- ' --------------- --------------- --------------------------- ----------------------------- --- — ----------------------------- --------------- -------------- --------------------- -- '. --------------- --------------- --------------------------- --------------------- ----- --------------- --------------- ---- -------------------- 7--- ----------------------------- ----------—---— ——————————————----- ———— —————————————————— ----------------------------- ----------- ---- ——————————————— --------------------------- ----------------------------- --------------- --------------- --------------------------- ----------------------------- --------------- --------------- --------------------------- ----------------------------- ' --------------- --------------- --------------------------- --------------- -----------i— SUMMARY SHEET TOTAL SHIPPED: BILL OF LADING TOTALSHIPPED(only If different): tRevised 1011/94 -717131071nispr77110057 yc pa er. p Page 1 of 2 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EWSC-012C Bureau of Waste Site.Cleanup ' BILL OF LADING Raka*aTracWng =bet' (pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0030) SUMMARY SHEET ' L. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF REMEDIATION WASTE AT RECEIVING FACILITY OR TEMPORARY STORAGE E Receiving FaciGtygem rary I ' Location Re res cStati a not: Da v i M. P e e P (P� ) Title: V.P.—Env. Services Signature: / ji/d r Date: n ' M. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SHIPMENT AND RECEIPT OF REMEDIA ION WASTE BY PERSON CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BILL OF LADING: I certify under penalties of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal,including any and all documents accompanying this csrtificatlon, and that, based on my Inquiry of those individuals Immediately responsible for obtaining the information,the ma information contain t ed herein is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate and complete. I am aware that . there are signifi t pe s lu ing, t not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, for wilfully submitting false, inaccurate, or incomplete informa n. Signature: r Date: Z /7—q /w ' Name of Person(print): David C. Bennett, President Director of Environmental Services BENNETT & O' REILLY, INC. 1 for Jack and Karen Birmingham ' Revised 10/1194 Itrs form rs pnn s on fe�cycledpaper. Page 2 of 2 ' Untitled ' South Dennis RARDON TRIHOUNT TICKET INQUIRY LOCATION: 331 South Dennis CUSTOMER / ORDER 02/10/00 CUST0MR: 133295 _ ENVIRO-SAFE CORPORATION 9 Loads ' ORDER: 20558 90IL/333 EEL RIVER/09TERV 183.70 TON = TICKET TINE ORDER PRODUCT TRUCK QTY 209285 13:23 20358 RECY SOIL OIL 78 14.17 TON 209284 13:21 20358 RECY 90IL OIL 8 20.98 TON 209283 13:19 20558 RECY SOIL OIL - 87 18.40 TON 209291 11:13 20538 RELY SOIL OIL 87 23.55 TON 209280 10:59 20338 RECY SOIL OIL 78 23.04 TON 209276 08:35 20558 RECY SOIL OIL 8 " 20.86 TON 209279 10:14 20338 RECY SOIL OIL 8 19.70 TON 209278 09:41 20558 RECY SOIL OIL 87 22.56 TON ; 209277 09:31 20558 RELY SOIL OIL 78 22.54 TON ; t 098 -s: er n Road B AL 1�-- a,r'n.15 s _ - - _ _ _ — n SCALE TIME TRUCKER NO,� UCK ------------ --- --- --- L'1� I k� �f l�ErtftTl 73.7 --- — CUSFOME FURCNASEbRDER NO — , ,PRODUCTCODE $ACETYPE _ ,ZONE PLANlTNO PROJEC NOS CORDS :,a_ ACCUM AMOUNT:: — — 1 CUSTOMER NAME s JOB NAME/DIRECTIONS- IV 7 Prl 'i.AE-E_ ..I ORPORn- T Et:.11d SiJ GE... EEL I"Ef?, f-JS'fEftV • �,.., ' r�r 131E r.t4I E,:rsT SANDW?c_ta;. Mpt PRODUCT: - `� '` N 17`T 1._:.' UNIT PRICE AMOUNT "" M GAGRAMS POUNDS fTONS.r' 1 GROSS t t,Ll , FS 58 TRUCKING RATE TARE ��4?lt''k ' i tl; TAX ltll. E=" NET f 7.1 4ti�"I 55 a TOTAL DUE }� . ARRIVE JOB DEPART JOB WAITING TIME WEIGHTMASTER VWe relieve the seller-of any liability for per�orial m�tiry or property. damage when delivery is made beyond the curb.hne. O i an"e Your business is greatly valued. �' Driver, Waiting tlmel excess of. r� f 1/4 hour well be charged at Received by: . �,�C_% ....� - current prices:::._:,.,;•x. ::. .:. CUSTOMER COPY CONTROL NO. 0 7 5 8 6 5 6 r 91 BT 25 ---- ------------ ------------ --- -- 1 r i -_— - r� ae7ii h �efin1 - rl1 Aa t�F•i'i FsY.n r�y��.. ```� -BA p fi'I L - - .�G R.l -: - .. ..._.. _+c na �`iOr _ SCALE. T'bATE ---=-'-�IM _TRFICKEETNO 1�. 14'424- `CUSTOMER ,,.'PURCHASE ORDER N6 PRODUCT CODE SALE:TYPE ;ZONE , T, PLANi'NO PROJECT•"rN0 j °t 0A0S ""ACCIJM'AMQUNT: 1 CU$TOMER:NAME s 1 ?JOB NAME/•DIRECTIONS` _ 0 t t !, EEL ,t'1 t't..rs, 11°i'k'4 l,'J ' !►� L;eX IS10 - PRODUCT.. :> :D ITY UNIT • PRICE AMOUNT ' . -Il4E MS POUNDS >'. TONS REt`:`r S,01t_ 01!_.' �. 1 . 40 .Ti)l+} GROSS ,c,El'a►�. a.� TRUCKING RATE,': TARE 500 ILI 0.3� TAX NET i` TOTAL DUE ' ARRIVE JOB . DEPART JOB WAITING TIME WEIGHTMASTER VWe relieve the seller of:any'Gability for:personal m#ury or property damage.when delivery is made beyond the curb line..- i.arz Your business is greatly value Driver: Waiting time in excessof „ 1/4 hour will be charged at Received by: / ' current paces: CUSTOMER COPY CONTROL NO.. 0758658 /99)BT--25 • f �bF►+ h Dena BAFPCO TRIMOUNT _ = -_ x - - _ DaTE - — t, 1.o F Cal - 1 � - -- - 'CU{STONER PCiA6HASE_ORDER NO, PRCDU{CT',CODE SALEEIFPE cZQWit , PLANTNO ,PR�OJEETNO y_ EGAD _ MRAMQUNT— i CCJSTOMERNAME � :IOB NAME/'DIRECTIONS; r �..r_ :•F, J:Ik'.Lf= 5itt=c 1 lUPJ LJ%t_ > t f-.t._ F. k`,'f:l .'f.l.!iY�J f t. rr'Ac;T. AIdOW1C+-f, i ii1 .. /1, PRODUCT UNIT : -:.,PRICE:'!,:.'. '`•:AMOUNT ARAMS POUNDS TD v NS 'E.C; t;•t 'f.(IN GROSS TRUCKING RATE TARE +C,tt'L��rLl TAX f tf ik NET , 1 !t)V.) La } TOTAL DUE ARRIVE JOB DEPART JOB WAITING TIME 'WEIGHTMAST.ER UWe relieve theseller of any liability for personal Ir►�ury:or property . damage'wlien delivery is made beyon.d the curb line. Your business is greatly valued. Driver: 1Naitirig time in excess of _ 1/4 hour will be charged at Received by: ,:; ,==-"-"-` current prices; _,z_ Y VIA CUSTOMER COPY CONTROL NO. 0758659 /99)BT 25 *Mill, r C. 90+1tIt flill 5 2Hgc'$ We st e r n Pa �)+i_: B irlT •S - MA k�e�F-C � TICKET NO•� TRIMO.UNT_- ._. H: -- - CEr • _,DATE T_ TIME TEiUCKEf�N CUSTOMER PURCHASEORDEA NO- P..RODUCTCODE"'rSALE:TYPE ;:ZONE PLANT:NO PROJECT'NO LOADS A_CCUN AMOUT G USTOMER NAME f., JOB NAME 1.61RECTIONS ` !.f �� l-E..i... rt I ''F.H. r.�._} f'r..'-'.'r VIC) Vf j 13 i.0 E:N`�'?' ial`Ji�t.{.1 !•�}•ay Iyl+:a t�,�'r::.,.; , PRODUCT :' QUANTITY :;;.UNIT 4- .PRICE AMOUNT: MEGAGRAMS POUNDS ';TONS.;;; ' GROSS. TRUCKING_ RATE TARE ! 1 r'o''' TAX NET TOTAL DUE ARRIVE JOB DEPART JOB. WAITING TIME WEIGHTMASTER I/We'relieve the seller of any liability for personal injury or property !` -art�� damage when delivery is made beyond the curb line. Your business is greatly valued. Driver: Waiting time in excess of- i/4 hour will be charged at , .. , Received by: current prices: CUSTOMER COPY CONTROL NO. O 7 5 y 6 6 O • r 91 BT 25 ---- 'r ---- ————————— ---- -- 4mt*h DPrirr i s - rQ - , TCCKE�ttO, - �c'8Q :?:Fd t.T..... l e.1. 1112,_ .mr - T UMOUNr �TRUCKE�t"NO�. , .. T-- �_•��. SCAL .CUSTOA "._._:_;PORCHASEORDER NO;_ PRODUCT-CODE':SALE7YPE :ZONE :- "PL'ANTNO t, P_ROJECTNO LOADS'__,ACCCIM 7Wf00NT I. 3..: 410 rN . � is�( S. i IJSTOMERs.NAME ilOB NAMElDIEiECTIONSc' -F x _. _. i=hJl.t.I RO._SAFF, f-,..)PP 7PPT .r ol�l 50 11... 3.1.3. i..l i_ ± iVt.} 1:'i S TFF '1 - ' . PO /Ikil , 1 r�, 6-1:7)f 73 A 11 C)W I!`{-i, mn S PRODUCT:,,--" = . .QUANTITY "UNIT , - PRICE . AMOUNT' .MEGAGRAMS 'POUNDS. NS " .E ......._., LPL r `.al.I T I._ o I. GROSS 47_<b'til `�a ?::4'1 :.. TRUCKING RATE TARE `4 f.4Q1'� `=" E1E'�. . TAX : NET I�_�t�80 . w 04. TOTAL DUE ARRIVE-JOB`. DEPART JOB WAITING TIME WEIGHTMASTER UWe relieve the seller of any liability for personal inyury.or property - damage when delivery is made beyond the curbaine. . Dx'.arie Your business is greatly valued. Driver: Waiting time in excess of -1 1/4 h6urwlil ae charged'at Received by: current paces; ti CUSTOMER COPY CONTROL NO. . 0758655 �/99)BT25 — —�'------ ------- ---- —'—'--'— r f - f _ _ 50JA h, Upi' nis ie7i t - — -- - -_; TRIMOUN7 ,: _ _ �TICI<ET E TIME TRUCKER NO TRUCKFNO CUSTOMER PURCHASEORDER NO P_RODUCf"CODE.'.`SALETYPE ;;ZONE PLANT'NO PROJECT`NO LOADS ACCUM AMOU_Nr 1•-?,.a�_' 410 0 USTOMER NAME 'JOB NAME f DIRECTIONS N F Cf11:11NCjtlf-'r: " I-E:F_ Ft� tlrl, z , I.J i 7T PaIDW`t.I.I"Ir irlf"1 jj- i t y PRODUCT' a i]UANTITY UNIT PRICE " AMOUNT MEGAGRAM$ POUNDS <fONS RF.CY S, L. f1.1 I... i.`1 1 1 ijpf GROSS . {tJ'�'►+i 4 k141 TRUCKING RATE TARE` tE�tlfil:: ;:', ?fh° TAX f1i,h: NET 3400 11 6.! e TOTAL DUE - ARRIVE JOB WEIGHT JOB ASTER I/We relieve the seller-of any liability for.per'sonal injury or property 11`i .T1 . damage when delivery is made beyond the Curti lirie. - Your business is greatly valued. Driver: % Waiting time'.in excess4of _ 1/4 hour will be charged at Received by: �J� id current pncesw' CUSTOMER COPY CONTROL No. G 7 5 86 5 4 �/99)BT25 --------------- -------- ----- r 1 4 - _ TTC — , KET N@7 Rh .R - _ TR MOUNT - _- - - -;- SCA - ..�., DATE=--� ,$ ��,. T►ME��~ TRUCKERsNO ,�JCC�Nf,� :.CUSTOMER PURCHASEQRDER NQ: PRODUCT CODE„SALE TYPE ` :<ZONE',-_M.PLANT NO -#pROJECFNO4 LOADS' "ACUNC"AMOCINT C SSTOMEI ilOB.NAME-/DIRECTIONS_. :, EN.V I FRO—SAFE CORPORA!-! i �;!11.t....` a.._, E t�i_. R I".�t3 US'l E. II. BOA, H 1.41 F PRODUCT .: '. tee': QUANTITY `UNIT" - PRICE. ;" `AMOUNT' MEGAGRAMS POUNDS..` cTONS` GROSS59 TRUCKING : ' 16 :K t RATE fil l 1=.k_4. 3 .J. TARE �.� ` i*' TAX AE ,1. k7 NET D` 5 TOTAL DUE :9 -ARRIVE JOB. DEPART JOB WAITING TIME.": ;.. ;.WEIGHTMASTER l/We.relieve the seller of any,liability for pe gnal injury of property damage when delivery_is made beyond'.the�ciiib lire. t)Ian a Your business is greatly valued. Driver: Waiting time in excessof'. 1/4 hour will be charged at Received by: �w current pnces �_; �, ,_ , CUSTOMER COPY CONTROL NO. 5 8 6 5 /99)BT 25 r - R - - _ Sough [? mile ?20 277= 6A _We-�tPrn Road TrcKEr No -- V _�1 _ x _. ..;:DATE TCMEn TRUCKER N0 �s RUCK SCALE - - r'1Ol� _ — @9;31 . FYRA-K ?; 77 "CUSTOMER ,_•t#�FORCHAsEE.oRDER NO PRODUCT,C'ODE,,SAL"E;TYPE . ,,... ZONE ;-- PLANTNO #;'PROJECTNO LOADS ACCFJMAMOfJfiR L33'295 410: .. @ PI 33.1. : 0:55#3 1 - -.: - - USTOMERNAME` ,— _;: JOB.NAME/DIREGTIONS-`.,i....:: L - - :. ENVIRO-SAFE CORPORAT'InN .. SDII,.'333 EEL. ASVEF/CISTEt? ;- ' PO .BOX 810 FAST SANDWICH, MA 02537 .V PRODUCT; QUANTITY UNIT : ,PRICE AMOUNT MEGAGRAMS POUNDS: TONS: RECY SOIL 0IL. 22. 54 T N 9 GROSS 200 4. 60 TRUCKING RATE TARE • 4120* 06 x i ~� TAX MAEX NET 5080 223. 54 '^w TOTAL DUE Y ARRIVE JOB DEPART JOB WAITING TIME WEIGHTMASTEA `..I/We relieve the seller of.any liability for.pe�sonal injury or property damage when delivery is made beyond.the curb[me.. Diane Your business is greatly valued. Driver: Eftit�n time in excess-of. r will be charge at Received by: �- �'�" paces_ " ` ' -CUSTOMER COPY CONTROL No. 07 5 8 S 5 2 - Uzane 'a Southj Dennis . 209276 zfte t��s tern Road#CAN ",%HE Co- t� B� h= ri s. ,.IAA '102660:;: :.TRIIIAOUNT -: ' - _ _ SCALE' DATE��, TIME_� TRUCKER',OM GK NOS- _ .� .r -HiS€�T:N5 E.CUSTOM _. URCHASE;ORDERNO PRODUCT£ODE 'SALETYI? .;._ZONE "PLANT NO PFiOJECTNO TOADS _ ACCUM AMO.UNC 1's32 5 �. 410 P I'l. '05.58 20-86 USTOMER NAME, JO&NAME'/:DIRECT IONS.=; irH ZRO-SAF CORPORATION EEL >'I` EP.,'05".EFtV PO BOX 81 0r EAST SANDWICH, MA 025.3: _ PRODUCT :: QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT' MEGAGRAMS POUNDS "" TONS;<` .R !"r -SOIL 'l.Tt_ :'O. 86 .'T'i l GROSS .3.5. 16 TRUCKING RATE TARE 460 0— ?.-30* Fi..E;t TAX NET 17: 0 20..86 TOTAL DUE ARRIVE JOB DEPART JOB WAITING TIME i WEIGHTMASTER I/We relieve the.seller of any liability for personal injury or property .damage when delivery is made beyond the curb line. D t a Your business is greatly valued. Driver: Wasting timein excess of 1/4 hour will be charged at Received by:. ;�� current paces: cc CUSTOMER COPY CONTROL NO. 0 7 5 8 O 51 99)BT 25 . --- ft ---------- - -.- -.�.- - -' -� - -- - - -. - 1 - r. v r 6 aasachusott$ Sfe artment of Environmens?af Protection Bureau of Waste She Cteanump n 13 WSC-pt ' ZB B ILL OF LADING (Pursuant to a10 CMA aa.aoaat LOG SHEET ( ��.s.T.xw.,Qrvvmtx� of _ LRA .1� " LOAD tNFORiMAT101J.- man ' LOAD 1 t Signature of Tranep rgetd 1 + O 0 ve: / r Reoei Fa ' am Pry Store Repryenragye; ' Date of Shipment; r-�m I Sh. � . +pmen. J� r Oa of ecsipt: T+uck/Traeta Ro is 4 (circle o el amlpm ac Time f Reed g anon: Traitor ReCIUMCOn t any): (i h i i (Poe LOAD Shg t fMortari Bons): Ira Representative: � cC�hhtt e ', �T6i-�o-f ShiC C _ if eivrng F� emP3 /Storage R eentativ Ong; /-AL /� fcrrcle ne)amlpm of Rec_t o . �... �, j c r•an5r�a<,straacn(l,tr;y} , .� N 77 G L. + Load 6a W,yds one), ' LbA1Q S+9 U t Te aporter Represe►lttitive: R eivin emp torage Rep entaGve: Cete of 3hipfnent: T ; a �►of Shiprr c b (circle , �e,U Recalct: Tune et Aeea; . anal am/pm 7ruckr�Traetor Registration: Trai!ar Re gtetration(if any): ., + c. };.y (circro cne►am 1 + load sa cu.yds LOAD d: Signature of Transporter Rep(esantative. Receiving Facilityfromporary Storage Representative: Oita of Shipment: Tim of Shipment: �. Data o4 Receipt: (ci:de one)am/pm Time of Receipt: Trutk/r►actor Registration:�� + ---- /—� /.— ' Trailer.Registration(it any): (circle one)am/pm LOAD St Signature of Transporter Noreaentadve; sae aft(c' lto"s): Reeelviny FacilltyRernpt7rary Storage fleprzaentative: Q e of Smiprnent: Time at Shipment: — /— /_w (circle one)err+/pm i Oate of Receipt: Ttme of Receipt: t Tru04Tractw Registration; Traitor RegiatratJan(!!arty): � (circle one)arnipm i Load Size(cu.yda.Aona): LOAD dt Signature of Transporter Representative: Receiving Facility/Temporary Storage Aepret;entativo: Date of Shipment: Time of Shipment: Date of ReCelpt: Trn1e of Receipt; (circle one)am/pni + Trck/Trttctor Registradgn: Trailer Registration(it any); i (circle one)amfpm LOAD Tt Signature of Tranaporter Representative; i toad.Size(Cu.ydsdtons): Receiving Facilfty/Temporary Storage Representative: Qal�of Sttipmenl: Time of Shipment; t bate of Receipt: Tine of Receipt.,(circle Cite}aMpm { _ /._ /`. 17rLefk/Tracitrr Registradan: Trailer R is e9 Uatian(if any): F = t (Circle one)arr rpm J. 'LOG SHE87'VOLUMi+: INFORMATICNi i Load Size(cu.yds(lane}: ITaal Volume This Page(cu.yde-Acns): Total Carried Forward(cu.yQa./wo): Total Carried Forward and This Ris+Be(.U.yds4tona):' :pah3et7 tOrt/93 1Qrm+8 Rr+nrttd Qn rec yeted Qs7GCr. ' Pace t at t MAD • _ aachusatts Depart'mem a f Environrnenlal Frafectlon } Bureau of Wa$ta.$ite Cleanup ' ( B WBC-O t 26 BILL OF LA1a1NG tpurauartt to eta cMrt 4o.00soi* `LOG SHBET�_ .,.ehaowesNumne OF LRA _ ' tr LOAD 1N"PONM*TlOHS LOAD t3 Signature of Tone t Rort r Aepresentetive: r D J l a- i Reoej F ityl fe ary Storage Repreeanrattva: Date of Shipment: Timig of Shipment:. j ' x (Circle one) m pm - t COO Receipt: Time 41 A TrtrcklTractar R°gistration: 'C°�(/ Trailer RetiieVatian (if oily): is ' y!�o201_ (a:r la re m ' LOAD Zt rat •e of Transporter Representative; i ad 9(ze cu. a./tans): 0'1 r S i A cluing Fa em o+ 011ie of Shi C Storage Repr entative; pr^e^t: Time of Shipment; r e 1Z�'/�� /?'ems /0 ' Oete at �(circle oeOpm k eip, (:f ary} , Z LOAD at Si r Load Size-,,yda tonsil) - Z,_�j 9rVSure of Trans Repraaerttative: r ��---� Ro r T `_„�"A- -�-�` t. eiviR ty e P StGtage ReptA atry Cite of Shipment: Time or Shipment: r 12 _-l.Q /�?o late of Receipt: ' _ (circle one)6* ; �/�/ � Tim t Roe "rucWTraotor Ae istrauon: _.�_ :B Trailer Regiatr lion((f any); �- �tZ�� (Greta:na)a i load Sit(cu.yd 1la.,ls LOAD 4: $ignatura of Transporter' Aepraeenta4ve; i Receiving Facilityf omporaryStorage Aspreeontativa: r 040 of Shipment: Time of Shipment: ' Date of Receipt, (circle one)am pm Tune of Receipt: TrupkrrraCtor RegiVration: ' rratlerRegistration(it any): ; (circle_ ana)am/pm r Load Sfia(cu.ydaJtone); L AO S. Signature of Transporter Representative: .Receiving Facility/rommary Storage Recresentative: 0ale of Shipment: Time of Shipment: r Receipt: Time of Receipt: (circle one)am/pm YruCk/r'raetor Registration: Trailer Ragietratton(it any); - r (circle ono)amlprri Load Siza(cu.yds.Aona): 4,dA0 64 Signature of Transporter Representative; Receiving F'acitlryyrernporary Storage AeprogentatEve: Dale at 5hfpment: Time of Shipment: i Date of faecerpt: Tht1e at Ab08fpt: (crate one)am/pm TrudiuTractor Registration: Trailer Sagistration(it any): (circle one)arn/;am Load.Size(cu.ydsJldns): ' LOAD 7t Signature 9f TgMponer Reprquntative: R*CeMng Fscil ty/Temporary Storage Repreaentativq: Oat§al 8iti meet; P Time of Shipment; r Date of Receipt; Time of Receipt: (circle one)am/am ; _/_ /_ , Trutlk/1 rector Registration: Trailer Regiatragan(if any): 1 ' f (citMe one)am/PM Load SILO(Cu.ydaAans): ,- ' J. 'LOG SHF.ZT VOLUME IMPORMAT1+011411e Total Volume'Rtfa Page(cu.yd;QAQna): Total Carried Forward(cu.yds.ltons): Total Carried Forward and This Page(cu,y(iS AaMs): ROVING 1011193 ii/Qrm re p�nrad ort reCyCted,Qa Psga t t FEB-08-00 03 : 14 PM BENNET&O^REILLY_INC. 50$+®g5+4687 A P. 07 Massachusetts at7® art- - . ` Bureau of Waste Site Clean pen! of EnvironMental Prote ction I BWSC,Q t 29 BILL OF LADING (pauant to gta cMa 4c.ao��f LOG SHEET._ Aw..�Trachme OF LRA ' — /52Sr (. LOAD 1NPCIRMAT1ONs 1 LOAD 1: Sign Lure of Trane t Mortar RaOresa' nth'v®: ,j r .FIR , „f �" ; Rrceiving F I VIIF5 ary o►a a Repr .sale of Shipment: Tune at Shiprrtenl; g entavve! t {circle ant a / i Data at Rec 'pt: T"ma )�pin i az acaipt Tnrcic/jract�Registration.�F Trailer Registration (it any); r 1 o d (c:rCr ) size o rn LOAD Z: Si L ra r ReAresentative: r aivirt r amfl y StaraQe A pies r etive; Oate ct Shipment: Time of Shipment, r ;p / 0 /1 ; o!� t1pt: Tune or Receipt< (cirri:one air Ipm r t p I''u'.yrTrl::c:pr..,,�:.�hrn r . r � ?'ails^x�:,tr.�tri:n{:I:cry}• i •� �. 7 � • -�..-=-� i Lola Size(cu. -tort y LOdD ig r IdYan er Repressintdtive: ' i oei itlryFfa rary Store Representative Gate of Shipment; T'rme of 5hip fr.rant: ft74 H i ofRecceipt Time,of weOi t:� (circle one) /r_c_• /O� / ' ' 'rW7►actor Registration; Trailer aeeiatraftan(If any): 3 -*? v r LZ sr y (Chore^rte}art pi ! Load Size(cu.yd r one LOAD 4: Signature at TranapOtfar Representative: i Receiving Facilityfromparary storage Asprssenta6ve: ' i 0410 or Shipment: Time of Shipment: ` Date of Receipt: . Tun4 of Receipt: (circle one)arnlpm Truck/Tractor Registration; Trailer Registration(If arty): i (Carole one)amipm Load Stse(cu.yds-Acne). MAD S: SiVature of Transpener Repr"entative: ' Re,ealvirtg Faciliry/remporaey Storage,Reoreaentative: i 0 e of Shipment: r Time af.Shipment: i Data of Receipt. Tun@ of Receipt, (Circle one)arnlpm TruolvTractcr Registration: —"/ / -'--- g . Trailer Registration(If ar%y); i (circle onri)amlpm i Lead Size(err.ydeAens): LOAD di Signature of Transporter Representative: Recaivin0 f c hY rYem ar ii Storage Representative., p ary .taraG 19e Pr Delta of Shipment: Time of Shipmant: t Date of Receipt: Time at Receipt: /— /--- (circle one)aailpfi TruoklTractor R istratian: Traer Registration (if any): + (circle one)amfpm ( Lead Site(cu.yds4ons): LOAo T: Signature of Transporter Representative: Receiving Facilityffemparary Storage Representative: 0014 of Shipment: rime of Shipment: Date of Receipt: Tyre of Receipt; /--- /-- (circle one)am/pm rudk/Tractcr Registration: Trailer R — /+— /`- �I egiatratian(if any): (circle one)smlpm 4cad Size(cu.yds4lana): . 'LOG SHEET VOLUME IMPORMAT10Ne Total Volume This Pape(cu.ydaJtOna): Total Carried Fgrt W (Cu.yao./ton3l: Total Carded Forward and This Page(Cu.yas.Rtms): v1440 10f7193 Iprrrr rs p+Tr►ted en rscictad,adder, Paaa t t COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS : : FOR.IN-STATE WASTE '� DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ` - 1t_ OIL ONLY DIVISION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OR One Winter Street IN-STATE VSQG HW/WQ ' Boston, Massachusetts 021.08 Please print or type.(Form designed for use on elite(12-pitch)typewriter.)UNIFORM HAZARDOUS 1.Generator US EPA ID No. Manifest 2.Page 1 Information in the shaded areas WASTE MANIFEST Document No. P 2 2 6` 5 of. 1 is not required by Federal law. 3.Generator's Name and Mailing Address John: Birmingham rii� PC= k 3 333 Eel � River--Road- .-._ � _ � Ostervi 1 le, MA 02655 ` s t; r, iQ ma �. 4.Generator's Phone( 508 )420-2685 05 5.Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number �C Ste e�s IDLn Enviro-Safe Corp. LMI D 91815121619131213, ._ w 7.Transporter. 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number (} Trrte�tonetl 1`„ L✓ ens W rq 5 pesi n ted F cility N me and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number � ��) m l x 1 S0�1 s �reen 0 seS Tien rter's 'onet'� 590 South Street East ' ` �;G StateF�acilf[ysklD� Ngt R,,�gUtf� ,;� � Raynham, MA 02767 A D 0 5 9 7 3 3 3 7 ii F:ic y,'s,Ptrc,nez( n f x N U 12.Containers 13. 14. r 11.US DOT Description fIncluding Proper Shipping Name,Hazard Class,and ID Number) Total Unit *W,&sf81Vo .. No. Type Quantity WtNol a a. Waste petroleum Oil NOS , ■C not DOT regulated 01 T G b. rr1 tv G Z to E s' F21) EnR c. A f�,. . O to T — r C 0 O � R d. �� § Zr x a� 0 . r z ` J.Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above linclude physical state and hezerd code 1 K Handling Codes for{,Wastes LisLedAbove f/1 ,, `': ' ��. U 8.� � r.» i. s ' a y_. C �xx . t a � ;. 5c �(,, •a ;"� ,.e-�, e a. > r r { r -.`" x K- -sr'�' tom ; 14E) 15.Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information .. .E Material Tested Being Marketed as MA97 Emergency Contact: Heather Atwood 508-888-5478 C- 16.GENERATOR's CERTIFICATION:I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by N shi in name and are classified,packed,marked,and labeled,and are in all respects in proper condition for transport b highway - �,. proper PP � P P P P P Y - O' according to applicable international and national government regulations. V If I am a� large quantity generator,I certify that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I have determined to be economically practicable C and that I have selected the practicable method of treatment,storage,or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the present and future threat to human health and the environ- ment;OR,if I am a small quantity generator,I have made a good faith effort to minimize my waste generation a elect the best waste management method that is available to me and that I � can afford. O Date Print�ypedmeignature Mont Da Year O y TR 17.Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Date U N Print edName Si ure Mon Day Year r rS P R 18.Transport_ 2 Ac wl ��ge of ceipt of Materials � j { Date T Printed/Typed Name _[___E Signature Month Day Year R 19.Discrepancy Indication Space F A c L 20.Facility Owner or Operator:Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. T - Y Printed?yped Name Signature Monnth Day-..'.Year . . Form Approved OMB No.2050.0039 EPA Form 8700-22(Rev. 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. COPY>4 : GENERATOR RETAINS EB.10.2000_10:07AM_DEP SERO N0.281_P.I'/ i Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Release Tmaking Number = RELEASE LOG FORM ATTACHMENT [7,4 F , -�--15283 E. LOGRtLEASE LOCATION INFORMATION: (ecmplats if using only BWSC-102S) GtylTown: aarnstai•,lA Date. n��ng/� Time: 1�;4�. AM ( PM Release 333 g,+pt River Road ' Address: Use at Attachment(check ene): Field ® Office Follow-up n Athachnxnt Ppge(s): F. ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION: I have reviewed a RAM Plan prepared by sennatt & O'Rieley for the above referenced site. The RAM proposes the folio wiriq: — ' removal of 130 Yards of soil removal of 3000 gallons of Rraundwater aulication of oRC before baelcf'illing installation of-a_ soil •vapor extraction: manifold The RAM Plan is hereby approved as proposed. This constitutes written approval of the RAM plan. of _..._ Post4t•Fax Note 71671 D°�' pages► t 7° VV. Fran — CeJDopt. co. Phone u Phono Fax k Me:r i! - -- — -. _. -7- -- G. DEP ASSIGNMENT: (compMf using BUVSC•1 d 102B or BWSC-102B only Preparer of RLFA(please 'g Signature: � � print): Staff Lead Assigned(n different from ' preparer): r 1 Check hero If the Release or Threat of Release Is unassigned. j Check here if this RLFA records a change in staff lead. ' Revised 7f13195 Supersedes Form BWSC-002 Page 2 of 2 Do Not Asher nis Form ' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-106 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup RELEASE & UTILITY-RELATED ABATEMENT Release Tracking Number MEASURE (RAM & URAM) TRANSMITTAL FORM _ 15283 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0444-0446 and 310 CMR 40.0462-0465(Subpart D) ' A. SITE LOCATION: Site Name:(optional) Ri rmi nnham Residence ' Street: 333 Fel River Road Location Aid: Assr's Mai? 115, Lot 2 City/Town: osterville ZIPCode: 02655-0000 Check here if a Tier Classification Submittal has been provided to DEP for this Release Tracking Number. Related Release Tracking Numbers That This RAM or URAM Addresses: B. THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO: (check all that apply) ' Submit a RAM Plan(complete Sections A,B,C,D,E,F,J,K,L and M). Check here if this RAM Plan is an update or modification of a previously approved written RAM Plan. Date Submitted: ® Submit a RAM Status Report(complete Sections A,B,C,E,J,K,L and M). ' Submit a RAM Completion Statement(complete Sections A,B,C,D,E,G,J,K L and M). Confirm or Provide URAM Notification(complete Sections A,B,H,K L and M). t ❑ Submit a URAM Status Report(complete Sections A,B,C,E,J,K,L and M). Submit a URAM Completion Statement(complete Sections A,B,C,D,E,I,J,K,L and M). ' You must attach all supporting documentation required for each use of form indicated,including copies of any Legal Notices and Notices to Public Officials required by 310 CMR 40.1400. C. SITE CONDITIONS: ' Check here if the source of the Release or Threat of Release is known. If yes,check all sources that apply: ® UST ❑ Pipe/Hose/Line AST D Drums Transformer Boat Tanker Truck ❑ Vehicle Other Specify: ' Identify Media and Receptors Affected: (check all that apply) Air W] Groundwater [] Surface Water Sediments Soil Wetlands F Storm Drain Paved Surface 0 Private Well ❑ Public Water Supply Zone 2 Residence ' n School Unknown Other Specify: Identify Release and/or Threat of Release Conditions at Site: (check all that apply) ' 2 and 72 Hour Reporting Condition(s) W 120 Day Reporting Condition(s) Other Condition(s) Describe: Soil and groundwater impact noted above RCS-1 and RCGW-1 standards ' RAMs may be conducted concurrently with an IRA only with written DEP approval DRAMs may not be conducted if any 2 or 72 Hour conditions exist at the site. Identify Oils and Hazardous Materials Released: (check all that apply) Oils Chlorinated Solvents Heavy Metals ' Wj' Others Specify: 42 fuel oil D. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE ACTIONS: (check all that apply) Assessment and/or Monitoring Only Deployment of Absorbant or Containment Materials ® Excavation of Contaminated Soils ® Temporary Covers or Caps ® Re-use,Recycling or Treatment ® Bioremediation ' 0 On Site ® Off Site Est.Vol.: 123 cubic yards ® Soil Vapor Extraction Describe: asrnhalt hatching ® Structure Venting System ' Store 0 On Site 0 Off Site Est.Vol.: cubic yards ❑ Product or NAPL Recovery SECTION D IS CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-106 ' Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup ' RELEASE $ UTILITY-RELATED ABATEMENT Release Tracking Number MEASURE (RAM & URAM) TRANSMITTAL FORM 15283 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0444-0446 and 310 CMR 40.0462-0465(Subpart D) ' D. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE ACTIONS(continued): ❑ Landfill O Cover O Disposal Est.Vol.: cubic yards Groundwater Treatment Systems Removal of Drums,Tanks or Containers Air Sparging ' Describe: Temporary Water Supplies Removal of Other Contaminated Media Temporary Evacuation or Relocation of Residents ' Specify Type and Volume: 1,494 494 qal 1 ons impacted groundwater Fencing and Sign Posting Other Response Actions Describe: ' See 310 CMR 40.0442 for limitations on the scope and type of RAMs. See 310 CMR 40.0464 for performance standards for DRAMs. Check here if this RAM or URAM involves the use of Innovative Technologies. DEP is interested in using this information to aid in creating an Innovative Technologies Clearinghouse. ' Describe Technologies: Oxygen R _1pasP Compound (ORC) E. TRANSPORT OF REMEDIATION WASTE:. (if Remediation Waste has been sent to an off-site facility,answer the following questions) ' NameofFacility: Agar(- atc- Tndus ries/ Olson's ,r _ _nhouseS Town and State: South Dennis, MA/ Raynham, MA ' Quantity of Remediation Waste Transported to Date: 123.8 yards o f s o i l / 1,494 clallons of cr roundwa t e r F. RAM PLAN: ❑ Check here if this RAM Plan received previous oral approval from DEP as a continuation of a Limited Removal Action(LRA). ' Date of Oral Approval: If a RAM Compliance Fee is required,check here to certify that the fee has been submitted. You MUST attach a photocopy of the payment. ' See 310 CMR 40.0444(2)to learn when a fee is not required. Check here if the RAM Plan is proposed for a Transition Site. If this is the case,you may need to attach an LSP Evaluation Opinion prior to undertaking the RAM,if not previously provided. See 310 CMR 40.0600 for further information about Transition Sites. G. RAM COMPLETION STATEMENT: ' If a RAM Compliance Fee is required in connection with submission of the RAM Completion Statement,check here to certify that the fee has been submitted.You MUST attach a photocopy of the payment. You owe this fee when submitting a RAM Completion Statement if you received oral approval of a RAM that continued an LRA,and have NOT previously submitted a RAM Plan and accompanying fee. ' If any Remediation Waste will be stored,treated,managed,recycled or reused at the site following submission of the RAM Completion Statement,you must submit a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan,along with the appropriate transmittal form,as an attachment to the RAM Completion Statement. ' H. URAM NOTIFICATION: Identify Location Type: (check all that apply) Public Right of Way Utility Easement Private Property Identify Utility Type: (check all that apply) Sanitary/Combined Sewerage Water Drainage Natural Gas ' 0 Telephone Steam Lines Telecommunications ❑ Electric 0 Other specify: Check here if you provided DEP with previous oral notification of this URAM. Date of Oral Notice: ' Check here if the property owner was NOT contacted prior to initiation of the URAM. If this is the case,you must attach an explanation of why the owner was not contacted,including the date and time when contact ultimately occurred. Check here if this URAM will occur in connection with the construction of new public utilities. If this is the case,document the nature and ' extent of encountered contamination,the scope and expense of necessary mitigation and the benefits amd limitations of project alternatives. With the exception stated below,the person undertaking the URAM must provide the name and license number of an LSP engaged or employed in connection with the URAM: I ' LSP Name: LSP License Number: LSP information is not required if the URAM is limited to the excavation and/or handling of not more than 100 cubic yards of soil contaminated by Oil,or not more than 20 cubic vards of soil contaminated either by a Hazardous Material or a mixture of a Hazardous Material and Oil. 1 I ' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-106 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup ' RELEASE & UTILITY-RELATED ABATEMENT Release Tracking Number MEASURE (RAM & URAM) TRANSMITTAL FORM _ 15283 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0444-0446 and 310 CMR 40.0462-0465(Subpart D) ' 1.URAM COMPLETION STATEMENT: Check here if this URAM was limited to the excavation and/or handling of not more than 100 cubic yards of soil contaminated by Oil,or not more than 20 cubic yards of soil contaminated by either a Hazardous Material or a mixture of a Hazardous Material and Oil. ' If any Remediation Waste will be stored,treated,managed,recycled or reused at the site following submission of the URAM Completion Statement,you must submit either a Release Abatement Measure(RAM)Plan or a Phase N Remedy Implementation Plan,along with the appropriate transmittal form,as an attachment to the URAM Completion Statement. ' J. LSP OPINION: I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have personalty examined and am familiar with this transmittal form,including any and all documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based upon application of(i)the standard of care in 309 CMR 4.02(1),(ii)the applicable provisions of 309 CMR 4.02(2)and(3),and(iii)the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(5),to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, > if Section B of this form indicates that a Release Abatement Measure Plan is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(i)has(have)been developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.000D and(iii) complies(y)with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals identified in this submittal; > if Section B of this form indicates that a Release Abatement Measure Status Report or a Utilh)(-Related Abatement Measure Status Report is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(i)is(are)being implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions o M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000 and(iii)complies(y)with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals identifiec in this submittal; B > if Section B of this form indicates that a Release Abatement Measure Completion Statement or a Utility-Related Abatement Measure Completion Statement is being submitted,the response action(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(i)has(have)been developed and implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000 and(iii)complies(y)with the identified provisions of all orders, permits,and approvals identified in this submittal; I am aware that significant penalties may result,including,but not limited to,possible fines and imprisonment,if I submit information which I know to be false,inaccurate or materially incomplete. Check here if the Response Action(s)on which this opinion is based,if any,are(were)subject to any r,�4s),permit(s)and/or approval(s)issued by DEP or EPA. If the box is checked,you MUST attach a statement identifying the applicable pr vihions=th reof,q ��1a t�}. ' '90 t� LSP Name: David (I- Bennett LSP#: 4303 Scam ya C, p: c� DAVID Telephone: Ext.: C. BENNETT FAX:(optional) — — � ,. No.4303 Signature: d'SF G►STE�� ' S1rE Date: & a An LSP Opinion is not required for a Utility-Related Abatement Measure Notification. An LSP Opinion is not required for a URAM Completion Statement if the URAM is limited to the excavation and/or handling of not more than 100 cubic yards of soil contaminated by Oil,or not more than 20 cubic yards of soil contaminated either by Hazardous Material or ' a mixture of Hazardous Material and Oil. K. PERSON UNDERTAKING RAM OR URAM: Name of Organization: Birmingham Residence dence ' Name of Contact: John and/or Karen Ftirraingham Title: _Owners Street: 333 Eel River Road ' City/Town: Ostervi1 1 e, State: MA ZIP Code: 02655-0000 Telephone: _508-428-2685 Ext.: FAX:(optional) ' ' Check here if there has been a change in person undertaking the RAM or URAM. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-106 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup RELEASE & UTILITY-RELATED ABATEMENT Release Tracking Number MEASURE (RAM & URAM) TRANSMITTAL FORM a _ 15283 Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0444-0446 and 310 CMR 40.0462-0465(Subpart D) 8 L. RELATIONSHIP TO SITE OF PERSON UNDERTAKING RAM or URAM: (check one) ® RP or PRP Specify: q Owner O Operator O Generator O Transporter Other RP or PRP: ❑ Fiduciary,Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status(as defined by M.G.L.c.21 E,s.2) Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way(as defined by M.G.L.c.21 E,s.50)) Any Other Person Undertaking RAM or URAM Specify Relationship: M. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON UNDERTAKING RAM OR DRAM: I, John and/or Karen Bi_rmi nc[ham ,attest under the pains and penalties of perjury(i)that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal,including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form,(ii)that,based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information,the material information contained in this submittal is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate and complete,and(iii)that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the entity legally responsible for this submittal. Ifthe person or entity on whose behalf this submittal is made amis aware that there are significant penalties,including,but not limited to, possible mes and imprisonment for willfully submitti_ false,inaccurate,or incomplete information. By: M. Title: own e rs ' (signature) ' 2 -y� For: John and/or Karen griminaham �'^W ✓, sic vl/ (print name of person or entity recorded in Section K) Date: `c��,. ' Enter address of person providing certification,if different from address recorded in Section K: Street: ' City/Town: State: ZIP Code: Telephone: Ext.: FAX:(optional) YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THIS FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMENT AS INCOMPLETE. IF YOU SUBMIT AN INCOMPLETE FORM,YOU MAY BE PENALIZED FOR MISSING A REQUIRED DEADLINE. i � APPENDIX D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RNVIROTRCH LABORATORIES, INC. ' MA CERT.NO.:/i-MA 063 k. 449 RTE. 130 SANDMICH, MA 02563 509 (999-6460) 1-900-339-64 60 FAX(509)999-6446 February 28, 2000 Bennett& O'Reilly, Inc. 1573 Main Street P.O. Box 1667 .y Brewster, MA 02631 t . Project Name: Bramingham/1333 Eel River Rd Project Number: B099-2533 Location: Monitoring wells Sample Date: 2/10/2000 grab Sampled By. David Bennett, K. Shumway Lab/D #: W0002033A-C ' Date-Received. 2/11/00 Results of Analysis: MW 1 MW 2 MW 3 Lab/D A B C Parameters Units Method MDL Date Analyzed Heterotrophic Plate Count /ml 86 68 28 9215 B 1 2/11/00 H pH units 5.21 5.79 5.60 4500 H+ NA 2/11/00 Nitrate-N mg/L 0.472 0.218 0.062 300.0 0.005 2/11/00 Nitrite-N mg/L <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 300.0 0.003 2/11/00 Sodium mg/L 28.1 19.7 21.0 200.7 0.1 2/14/00 Iron mg/L 0.085 <0.005 1.81 200.7 0.005 2/14/00 ' Manganese , mg/L 0.159 <0.001 0.042 200.7 0.001, 2/14/00 Magnesium mg/L 2.5 0.2 0.6 200.7 0.2 2/14/00 TKN mg/L 0.98 <0.2. <0.2 351.3 0.1 2/15/00 ' Total Nitrogen mg/L 1.45 0.22 <0.2 4500-N 0.1 2/15/00 Chloride mg/L 66.0 24.8 31.4 300.0 0.06 2/11/00 Total Dissolved Phos(P) mg/L 0.040 0.020 <0.003 4500-P 0.003 2/25/00 ' Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 121.0 45.0 57.0 2540C 6.0 2/24/00 Sample Time 10:00 8:15 9:00 t <=less than >=grea n Ro ald J. S ri LaboratorDire or O1111/1100 TUE 10:21 FAX 111 111 1141 ENVIROTECH LABS 1�j001!002 nnraAvancrn a.riavauaa vazaaa�,u*�. ' MA CERT.NO.:M-MA 063 449 RTE. 180 S"'Mck Jf * o8563 ' Sod l*BB-"BOI 1-800-asg-"W F"(60Al),dM-f,#4s III June 12, 2000 11 _ Bennett& O'Reilly,Inc. 1873 Main Suet P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02634 " Project Name: Bramingham/1333 Bel River Rd ' Pr%ct Number, B099-2533 Locatlon: Monitoring wells Sample Date: 5/30/2D00 grab ' Sampled By: Kara Shumway „ Lab ID 9. W0005078A-C Date Received: 5/30/00 Results of Analysis: ro NMI 1 MW 2 MW 3 ' Lab ID A B C Parameters Units McMod MDL Date An ed Heterotro hic Plate Count /ml 1140 400 7400 92158 1 5/30/00 H H units 6.37 9.48 7.89 4500 H* NA 5130/00 Nitrate-N iml kL 0.146 0.328 0.109 300.0 0.005 5/30/00 NWHO-M I mgfL <0.003 <0.003 40.003 300.0 0.003 5130/00 Sodium rn /L 33.4 16.8 27.9 200.7 0A 6/i/00 Iron m L 0.192 1.12 1.39 200.7 0.005 0/1/00 ' Manganese 0.080 0.018 0.141 200.7 0.001 8/1/00 Ma neslum 7.5 17.3 32.6 200.7 0.2 9/1/00 TKN L 4.5 <0.5 <0.5 351.3 0.5 612/00 ' Total Nitrogen m /L <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 4600-N 0.1 612100 Chloride m L 56.1 22.7 43.1 300.0 0.06 513WO Total Dissolved Phos P rnqLL 0.062 0.144 0.102 45MP 0.003 816100 ' Total Dissolved Solids m L 144.0 $4.0 78.0 2640C 6.0 W/00 Sample lime 11:05 11:10 12:10 ' <=less than >-greaterthan By.,:f` Ron d I' ' l.�orat ' odor p GROUNDWATER Groundwater Analytical,Inc. P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL 228 Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 February 15, 2000 F RECEIVED FEB 6 2000 Ms. Kara Shumway Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. ' P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Lab I D: 31487 Sampled: 02-10-00 ' Dear Kara: Enclosed are the Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Diesel Range 'Organics Analyses performed for the above referenced project. This project was processed for Rush turnaround. ' This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, ' and a statement of our state certifications-. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals ' immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. t Sincerely, Jonathan R. Sanford President J RS/awc Enclosures ' a a GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method D Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/Fl D Field ID: SW-N:6-15' Laboratory ID: 31487-01 Project: Birmingham/0099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0854-M Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 02-10-00 Container: 250mL Glass Received: 02-11-00 Preservation: Cool Extracted: 02-11-00 Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 02-14-00 %Moisture: 3 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 " �, = EPHRanges � ;q _ x Conceritrafion > ;Un�ts��wReportmg,limif ' n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 110 mg/Kg 30 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL mg/Kg 30 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 39 mg/Kg 30 u ad' t n C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 39 mg/Kg 30 �`�CAS Number�rx � f4' � � ".• "�" � � '` * �` �' �"` R ofin Limit • ,��x��Target,AnalYtes -� � z M�- �t� r�Concentration� � �� . ,Un?ts��..'.,eP ,8. .__. 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 ' 91-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL mg1Kg 0.50 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 c$ir efc- 9 4012 nS" Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 84 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 84 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 76 % 40-140% ' ortho Terphenyl 85 % 40-140% � QAIQC_Certtftcation 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA(QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.1.1? Yes Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. ' The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Results are calculated on a dry weight basis. Method modified by use of microwave accelerated solvent extraction technique. ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting Limit is the lowest :t concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it ' that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FI D Field ID: SW-W:6-15, Laboratory ID: 31487-02 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 • QC Batch ID: EP-0854-M Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 02-10-00 Container: 250mL Glass Received: 02-11-00 Preservation: Cool Extracted: 02-11-00 ' Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 02-14-00 %Moisture: 3 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH Rangesta � C,oncentrationzga �Umts' ,R'eportmgLmt n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 480 mg/Kg 30 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 64 mg/Kg 30 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 160 mg/Kg 30 n d'u n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 170 mg/Kg' 30 ` 1( ' eit/��ndl CS'., .� COt_1CCntldtlon� y >� " UnttS "R O,1fln� Lir1(f Numbera - Yt .epw g4, 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene 1.3 mg/Kg 0.50 85-01-8 Phenanthrene 0.54 mg/Kg 0.50 � g ' 83-32-9 Acena hthene BRL m K 0.50 P P� g CSurrogate;Compounds;-, fiRecoyery QC�Limits' ~ Fractionation: 2-Fluor biphenyl 94 % 40-140% ,2-Bromonaphthalene 91 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 61 % 40-140% ' ortho Terphenyl 93 % 40 140% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes ' 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.1.1? Yes Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report: Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. ' The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Results are calculated on a dry weight basis. Method modified by use of microwave accelerated solvent extraction technique. ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest t concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it ' that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FI D Field ID: SW-S:6-15' Laboratory ID: 31487-03 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0854-M Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: . 02-10-00 Container: 250mL Glass Received: 02-11-00 Preservation: Cool Extracted: 02-11-00 ' Matrix: Soil - Analyzed: 02-14-00 %Moisture: 14 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 COI1Centrdti ,u ..s KPH Ran es � ;� �. � �� -r �.� � �� `�r,,.r <. ...$. ,E.;r-:,.r�r,,a� ��»."3'��.x��s .s^:�.3✓'z» `.v''.,� ",��s, is vm��.< �lx�xt' �•". .. r�.,�. UnItS��'Rep01'ting��l(Yllt n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 42 mg/Kg 34 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL mg/Kg 34 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL mg/Kg 34 Un u n C11 to n C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL mg/Kg 34 •w C s 3 t`t ax m` a py;` --�+ 5, -a: wa w:"Ft' w ACAS Numbers, „ ,# >= tTarget Anal it es= Concentration ' Urnts , R"`'rbn Limit 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL _mg/Kg 0.56 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.56 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL _ mg/Kg i 0.56 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL mg/Kg 0.56 ' "tk z QC Surrogate Compounds '" s 9A M a 1;. ,. , QCrlim fs , Fractionation. 2-Fluorobiphenyl 84 % 40-140 ,2-Bromonaphthalene 81 % 40-140 % Extraction: Chloro-octadecane _ 78 % 40- 140% ortho Terphenyl 84 % 40 140% 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes i 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.1.1? Yes Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. ' The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Results are calculated on a dry weight basis. Method modified by use of microwave accelerated solvent extraction technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. 1 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 ' GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FI D Field ID: SW-E:6-15' Laboratory ID: 31487-04 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0854-M Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 02-10-00 Container: 250mL Glass Received: 02-11-00 Preservation: Cool Extracted: 02-11-00 ' Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 02-14-00 %Moisture: 4 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 �,1 d&d� c �.r.✓s �a&.aei ".` xa a t u. d".y .3^-.a a a� uo a r, ;EPHyRanges;�� ' t7 g � Concentratton� Umts, R `o ,[imi` x v<�. eR rhn g ' n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 41 mg/Kg 30 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL mg/Kg 30 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL mg/Kg 30 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons r BRL mg/Kg 30 � ,}g�r ram. ,,.^,� ,yr•: 9. w" ``` ''.y '="'X. �.,_ + it'.'.t'Y' fir^' vim:9 y , ACAS Number �.,� � ;Ta et Anal es; �"rg ,yt � � , �_ Concentrafron� , �.a Units Reportmg.t.�mrt 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 ' 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene _ BRL mg/Kg 0.50 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 . QG$tirrrogate Compounds ' t .`. ��Recovery jr �ANOAP ,Li6ij6444 Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl _ 79 % 40- 140 % ,2-Bromonaphthalene 78 % 40- 140 % _ Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 76 % 40-140% ' ortho Terphenyl 83 % 40 140% g�:, ��' �,.s,,"z�u'i6 f k '.t�'.n� t d'-f'. �� $` �.,��k: Q. T�,.� �""f�3a.Rcm�.�✓�ie% .�.6� �` `��«. y�1�'C °5 ��-+a'n?.?: e 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.1.1? Yes Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Results are calculated on a dry weight basis. Method modified by use of microwave accelerated solvent extraction technique. ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest t concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. , Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. - Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: BOH: 16' Laboratory ID: 31487-05 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0854-M Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 02-10-00 Container: 250n l Glass Received: 02-11-00 Preservation: Cool Extracted: 02-11-00 ' Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 02-14-00 %Moisture: 12 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 �EP,HRan Concentrafion � Units� Reporting4Grrmf ' n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons — BRL — mg/Kg 33 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL mg/Kg 33 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL mg/Kg 33 Unadjusted n C11 to n C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' BRL mg/Kg 33 91-20-3 I Naphthalene BRL r mg/Kg 0.56 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene _ BRL _ I mg/Kg 0.56 ' 85-01-8 i Phenanthrene BRL 1 mg/Kg 0.56 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL mg/Kg 0.56 ' QC Su`r'rogate Compounds,. ; , , � Recovery;;= ' " QC Llinits{ , �. ._ k.� Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 87 % 40-140% i ,2-Bromonaphthalene _ 85 % _ 40-140% _ Ext tsar ion Chloro-octadecane 79 % 40-140% ' ortho Terphenyl 83 % i 40 140% Q/UQCt0olflCatlOn 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3.1.1? Yes Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. ' The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Results are calculated on a dry weight basis. Method modified by use of microwave accelerated solvent extraction technique.. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest I ' concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it ' that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. 1 • Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL EPA Method 8100 (Modified) Diesel Range Organics by GC/FID ' Field ID: Overburden.Stockpile Laboratory ID: 31487-06 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: HF-1281-M Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 02-10-00 ' Container: 250mL Glass Received: 02-11-00 Preservation: Cool Extracted: 02-11-00 Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 02-14-00 9/6 Moisture: 4 Dilution Factor: 1 �" Analyte :' x� � � �� Concentratron � �� Unrts°'° ReportmgL�mit `� Diesel Range Organics BRL mg/Kg 60 '�tQC S ro Compounds A " Recovery QCLimtts��=' ortho-Terphenyl 86 % 60-140 % ' Method Reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,US EPA,SW-846,Third Edition, Update III(1996). Analytical protocol modified to quantify total petroleum hydrocarbons. Results are quantified on the basis of 5a—androstane. Results are reported on a dry weight basis. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. , i t 1 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Lab ID:- 31487 ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Received: 02-11-00 This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition. The sample(s) were received ' undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation. x `_ �'� �� "� �,� L � �B Project Documentation x '�„ x � n u� r✓ ",� '��" This project was accompanied by satisfactory Chain. of Custody documentation. The sample container ' label(s) agreed with the Chain of Custody. No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were noted by the laboratory during the processing of these ' sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification. r Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 ROUND,w, x 228 Main Street,P.O.Box 1200 A!ER Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ANALYTICAL Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER Ns 39449 FAX(508)759-4475 rojectrName: Firm: IID u �' / TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST volaulee samiralalller 1.1r1rb & Nah4 °°1° �00 Nor. Gawal chemis" ether Project Nu ber: Address: ❑STANDARD(10 Business Days) Max CQ p �] ❑ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) IgA 1D 1 / 1 O B!�( '6� 1 - RUSH(RAN- 29Z _1 c $ � c gg (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number( ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 3 ❑ - Sampler Name: City/State/Zip: $ o 1 /p ,,).- -0- /-3 Please FAX ES ❑NO JL1llCT Gb o s ' FAX Number: � IPrroject,,Manager: elle/e``�hho``ne: // ZZ�� BILLING - - W✓�l� l -1411(�1A (5wJ 2q6 b6UIJ ° ❑ o 0 0 0 0iE Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference)No.: ❑ A _ ❑ Q =INSTRUCTIONS:Use sep to line for each container(except replicates). €- - 7 ❑ ❑ Sampling - a s 9 $ s" 9 = g a ° e P 9 Matrix TYPe Contalner(s) Preservation Felmea ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o o 5 ❑ ° 0. SAMPLE $ a LABOR x $ ° 13 gg gg ❑ ❑ e IDENTIFICATION < g `"' a " a ct NUMBER -- B e ❑ ❑ e �' ai (Lab Use Only) d s _ W I; s 555 ❑ ❑ j _A' b_15f 3/ �� a9smsa � � � - � R 00 ° 000 € s8 `� 6D 1'A7 IV ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ o ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o e ❑ ❑ a C 1 / a + :20 b S' Muni I a 11 - 5j S REMARKS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specific OC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require project TReM* ampler: Date Time Received by: Receipt Temperature: ❑MA DEP form specific OC.Project specific OC includes Sample Duplicates, ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory OC is Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC ❑RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples, Relinquished by:. Date Time R ceive by: Shipping/Airbill . MA MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS,_MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional Number: , Reportable Conc ntrations sample aliquot. �' 1/Od ,2 ❑RCGW- RCS-1 Project Specific OC Required Selection of OC Sample Re' had to D to Time eceived r tory: Custody Seat/ ❑RCGW- RCS-2 ``'' Cooler Serial ❑Sample Duplicate Selected by laboratory �-(� �� lry ❑MA Dredge Disposal ❑Matrix Spike s-� Number: ' P ❑Please use sample: ❑NH❑RI❑CT❑ME Me-thod ipment: TWA Courier❑Express ail ❑Federal Expres Specify Category: ❑Matrix Spike Duplicate • 'E7 UPS 0 Hand 0 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Assurance/Quality Control - A Progra Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high ' quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). ' Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. . ' All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration. verification standard and a blank; and excepting GUMS sequences, all sequences close'with a continuing calibration standard. GUMS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control ' sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. Definitions ,.,, .. . ' Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together.for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and.the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of•time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. ' Labor=atory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control - Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or ' expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical"system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate ' steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each . ' sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: MA DEP EPH Method ' QC Batch ID: EP-0854-M Matrix: Soil Units: mg/Kg .SAS}Number r. AnalyteSpdied «� MeasuredRecouery QC limits ; 111-84-2 n-Nonane(C9) 5.0 2.6 51 % 40-140% 629-594 n-Tetradecane(C14) 5.0 3.6 72% 40-140% 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(C19) 5.0 3.9 79% 40-140% 112-95-8 n-Eicosane(C20) 5.0 4.2 84% 40-140 % 630-02-4 n-Octacosane(C28) 5.0 4.1 81 % 40-140% 91-20-3 Naphthalene 5.0 3.2 63% 40-140% 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 5.0 3.5 70% 40- 140% �� .. . ✓Ru ,"� a A`�bdl�.�,� q u,c � �� % s t, a °��a�x�r � �,� ; � _ a rx �, Recove s r ME' Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 76 % 40-140 % , 2-Bromonaphthalene 75 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 77 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 80 % 40- 140% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, ' or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. I 1 i ' Groundwater Analytical Buzzards Ba MA 32 , Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzza y, 02 5 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Method Blank ' Category: ' MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-0854-M Matrix: Soil a, t x,•zk,' *. rg; u4- taw `s=«" ` x *' b " "`"asCOflCe ltCdtlOnass»„'.$`��a err '' �nitS � RCp,Orttng Yllfllf Pkl f Rini n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL mg/Kg 30 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL mg/Kg 30 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 0 BRL mg/Kg 30 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL mg/Kg 30 ASZ Number ; t Target Analytes .;, ,r:`� Goncentrat�on aUnits Reporting limit e .. ' 91-20-3 Naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL mg/Kg 0.50 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL l mg/Kg 0.50 QC,,Surrogatocompounds § lltiR coyery Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79 % 40- 140% ' 2-Bromonaphthalene 68 % _ _ 40-140%--- Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 85 % 40-140% .ertho-Terphenyl 83 % 40-140 Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). ' Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution,percent moisture and sample size. ' t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. t t Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER { + ' ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE ' 'Laboratory Control Sample Recovery s Category: EPA Method 8100 (API .Modified) ' Batch ID: HF-1281-MLS Matrix: Soil Units: mg/Kg j Laboratory-Control Sample " SPIKE SPIKED . PERCENT -' ,QC . ANALYTE ADDED RESULT . ° RECOVERY LIMITS Diesel Fuel 130; 93, 70% .60-140 - .. ... �, a ,. _ � ., -• . Calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or_. alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE Method Blank ' Category: EPA Method 8100 (API Modified) Batch ID: HF-1281-MB1 Matrix: Soil PARAMETER CONCENTRATION REPORTING LIMIT ' (mg/Kg)' (mg/Kg) Diesel Range Organics BRL 60 QC SURROGATE COMPOUND SPIKED MEASURED RECOVERY QC LIMITS o-Terphenyl 2.7 2.3 94 % 60 - 140 1 BRL = Below Reporting Limit. Calculations based on dry sample weight. Quantification based on a Diesel, ' component standard. Method Reference: Method 8100 - Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons„ Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA SW-846, Third Edition (1986). Modification based on Method for Determination of Diesel Range Organics, American Petroleum Institute (1990). 1 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Certifications and Approvals ' CONNECTICUT;`Department of Health Services;`>PHk0586 , ` ; Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste,Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved ' Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. MAINS;EWp ttment,of H- Services, MA703 f { Drinking Water y Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. I ' Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analytes. .wy.: '2 fi 7"l. bS°Rwfi r" _ MASSACHUSETfS Department of Environmental Protection, M MA t03 n,x n Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,Fluoride,. ' Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity,Total Dissolved Solids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform,Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water ' Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate•N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated ' Biphenyls(water) Polychlorinated Biphenyls(oil) .. ;MICHIGAN =Department of Environmental Quality : .^. a.. a n .•a. a _ Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 `NEWHAMPSHIREDepartment ofEnv�ronmentalLServ�ces, 202798ki Drinking Water ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium, Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. ' RHODE ISI.AND,'Department�of Health, 54x � � xu Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage ' Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 RECEIVED MAR 1 7 2000 ' GROUNDWATER Groundwater Analytical, Inc. P.O. Box 1200 ANALYTICAL 228 Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 ' Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 ' March 15, 2000 Ms. Kara Shumwa Y Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 Y ' Project: Birmingham/0099-2533 Lab I D: 31806 Sampled: 02-29-00 Dear Kara: Enclosed are the Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses performed for the above referenced project. This project was processed for Standard Two Week turnaround. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, and a statement of our state certifications. �11 I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to ' the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.' Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do.not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ' Jonathan R. Sanford President ' J RS/pj m Enclosures GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by WAD Field ID: MW-1 Laboratory ID: 31806-01 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0614-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 02-29-00 Container: I Amber Glass Received: 03-01-00 Preservation: pH<2 H2SO4/Received on Ice . Extracted: 03-13-00 ' Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 03-14-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH°.Ranges - Concentration v ' Units ; 'Rep rti glL mit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 530 ' n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 530 Yy n-Cl1 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 200 ' Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 200 QC,Surrogate:ComPounds ;__ Recovery. QC,Limits., , Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 77 % 40- 140 % ' 2-Bromonaphthalene 76 % 40- 140 % Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 63 % 40- 140 0/6 ortho-Terphenyl 69 % 40-'140 QAIQC Certficaton �., ;�' ''�` 1. Were all QA/QC'procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes ' 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section-11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique.- Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest ' concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. t 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. 1 • ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-2 Laboratory ID: 31806-02 . Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0614-F I ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 02-29-00 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 03-01-00 Preservation: pH<2 H2SO4/Received on Ice Extracted: 03-13-00 ' Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: , 03-14-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EP.H Ranges= � , ;; _ ,,, Concentrat on Umt`s"" ,,, Reporting Uriit n� m n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 y n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 200 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 200 QC Surrogate;Compounds Recoveryx QC L>imits >., - Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79 % 40- 140 % ' 2-Bromonaphthalene 70 % 40- 140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 63 % 40- 140 ortho-Terphenyl 73 % 40- 140 �QA/QC Certification 1. Were all QA/QC'procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes ' 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,Project narrative and quality control report are considered par,of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest ' concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. r 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc. P.O. Box 1200 228 Main Street Buzzards Ba MA 02532 Yt Y, GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/F1D - Field ID: MW-3 Laboratory ID 31806=03 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0614-F ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 02-29-00 Container: 1L Amber Glass Received: 03-01-00 Preservation: pH<2 H2SO4/Received on Ice Extracted: 03-13-00 ' Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 03-14-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH Ranges ! rm ,mts ncnrao por Lm it n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons . BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 370 ug/L 200 Unadjusted n C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 440 ug/L 200 QC,Surrogate.:Corripounds- Recovery. QC,Limits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 83 % 40- 140`% . 2-Bromonaphthalene 84 % 40- 140 % Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 64 % 40- 140 ortho-Terphenyl 71 %- 40- 140 % ' QA%QC Certrfication 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes ' 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest ' concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. t 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Lab ID: 31806 ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Received: 03-01-00 ' A yPhysical Conditiowof Sam le(s) This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition. The samples) were received ' undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation. y 1 r x zM r ? 1 t A' L5 ffi ib: B. Protect Documentation This project was accompanied by satisfactory Chain of Custody documentation, with the following amendment(s)or correction(s): 1. Samples 31806-01 through —03 for analysis by MA DE Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons were filtered by the laboratory prior to analysis. ' C Analysisof Sarriple(s) ;x3 . .: Nanalytical o anomalies or non-conformances were noted by the laboratory during the processing of these sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification. t ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i i i i•<:.i i i i i i Main S ree, .O.Box 1200 WATER Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ANALYTJCA Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER Ns 39443 FAX(508)759-4475 Project Name: Firm: e TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST 2Y1N 61-}W 68NNiET-1 q 0`r-b i- y STANDARD(10BusinessDays) VOW[.e Semlmletllee Pe reNPCae Metals A°0� eo�reoi Hu. eemrelChemlrtry ether �Pro�jec(tt]Number: Address: /�7 ❑ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) g $ dJlll"I -25� FAQ O� il.6 I ❑ RUSH(RAN-_ c1 (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) ° ❑ ❑ ❑ s ❑ ❑ Sampler Name: City/State/Zip: CCBl�y�.� (�/�(' 'j�n e��p ,/�/y� -�` Please FAX YES ug _ } 1 tJ Zgft )C-t C-F-1�f F-� QLhj3)' FAX Number:_��x (a4'6�' O 9 g @ Project Manager: Telephone: BILLING a a 5 pp\\ J ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ 3 x ��aOJI to(p(o Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: o 09�i Z zr INSTRUCTIONS:Use separ line for each container(except replicates). ❑ € E ° 5 E Sampling Matrix pe Container(5) Preservation Fll a ae 0 0 0 o c a 0 0 0 o o a ❑ _ o ° SAMPLE LABORATORY $ = ° s a ° ° IDENTIFICATION > g a a x` - a 9 NUMBER S _ € ' - �' ❑ y ❑ ° W W 12 S a a S 5 a 5 5 a - (Lab Use Only) 6 m J a2 � ° x €_ E a ° ❑ ° a Ivy 3 : �i � � >z § g � " 0 � ° a 0 s s 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ o o ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ B ❑ ❑ '� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ HR x"a REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specific OC j NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. 1_ }41 ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Man regulatory❑ DEP Form y Programs and EPA methods require project Time Relinquished by Sampler: Date me Received by: Receipt Temperature: specific OC.Project specific OC includes Sample Duplicates, p ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory OC is /od �IS� t Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC ❑RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples, Relinquishe Date I Time I Re '' by: Shipping/Airbill A,9A.MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional �'� l� 4Da Number:Reportable Concentrations sample aliquot. J /� r _ .S;<RCGW-1 ❑RCS-1 Project SpedilcOC Required Selection of OC Semple Re by: Time Received by aboralory: Custody Seat/ ❑RCGW-2❑RCS-2 Cooler Serial' ❑Sample Duplicate .❑Selected by laboratory - - ❑MA Dredge Disposal ❑Matrix Spike ` !` Number: ❑NH❑RI❑CT❑ME p ❑Please use sample: Method of Sh' ens: GWA Courier[I Express Mail ❑Federal Expre Specify Category: ❑Matrix Spike Duplicate _ ❑UPS ❑Hand ❑ f, GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL - ' Quality Assurance/Quality Control e A� Program ClVerVleW _ r Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program-to ensure the production of high ' quality, valid data. This program closely follows the.guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). ' Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. :v Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity', and documented for traceability. ' Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. ' All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GUMS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing calibration standard. GUMS systems are tuned.to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of 'one.laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation ' batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. B. Definitions x� ' 'x � 7 x ' Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an.aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. . Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. Groundwater Analytical, In c P.O. ox 1200 228 Main Street Buzzards Ba M y, A 02532 GROUNDWATER 0 ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-0614-F Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L CASNumbe� E .m 4Ana e ¶ rliedSar *:Measured Recove CUmtts 111-84-2 n-Nonane(C9) 50 21 42 % 40-140% 629-594 n-Tetradecane(C14) 50 35 69% 40-140% ' 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(C19) 50 37 75%- 40-140% 112-95-8 n-Eicosane(C20) 50 '41 82% 40-140% `v 630-02 4 n-Octacosane(C28) 50 37 74% 40-140 SU W-, offi odS a a�'9 x rzp a C L1n11tS '�3 QC rroga Pam. w. ..,, ,. Recoverymx . ..Q. .,. Fractionation. 2-Fluor biphenyl 67 % __ 40-140% ' 2-Bromonaphthalene 69 % _ 40- 140%Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 76 % 40 140% L ortho-Terphenyl 70 % 40- 140% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. r r Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 a GROUNDWATER a ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank a Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-0614-F Matrix: Aqueous n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 200 nU adjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' BRIL ug/L 200 00 Ur1dS ,y mpow Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 73 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 40 % _ 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 77 % 40-140 ortho-Terphenyl 69 % 40-140% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998)., Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyze.-Reporting limit is-the lowest. _ ' concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. . Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. ' 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. II { Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL tCertifications and Approvals . `CONNECTICUT, Department of Health Services, PH-0586 tji Potable Water,Wastewaterfrrade Waste,Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, . Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium;Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. wMAINE;,Department of,rHumanServices, :MA>103 s Drinking Water ,y Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analytes. MASSACHUSETTS, Department of Environmental`Protection, M MA 103 Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium;Thallium,Nitrate•N;Nitrite-N,Fluoride„ .., ... ' Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity;Total Dissolved Solids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic -. Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Colifonn,Fecal Coliform,Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, ' Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated Biphenyls(water) Polychlorinated Biphenyls foil MICHIGAN ;101epartmen6of Environmental`�,Quality: ' Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 ' =NEW HAMPSHIRE Department oft Environmental Services 202798 h .r Drinking Water ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium, Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate•N,Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. RHODE ISLAND,Department of"Health454 Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 - I j1,,ra a.,' �� 4 ' GROUNDWATER Groundwater Analytical, Inc. P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL 228 Main Street Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 ' Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 ' April 21, 2000 Ms. Kara Shumway Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. ' P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 •y ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Lab I D: 32506 Sampled: 04-06-00 Dear Kara: Enclosed are the Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses performed for the above referenced project. 'This project was processed for Standard Two Week turnaround. ' This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a 'part of this report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, ' and a statement of our state certifications. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals ' immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. ' Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Jonathan R. Sanford i . President J RS/awc Enclosures GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-1 Laboratory ID: 32506-01 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0635-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 04-06-00 Container: I Amber Glass Received: 04-06-00 Preservation: pH<2 H2SO4/Received on Ice Extracted: 04-18-00 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 04-20-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 EPH;Rangest ',` _ ,„; ter, -, ,Cot cent�ation j 'Units':',, v..R-6itkg lin t n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 520 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 1 520 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 200 " Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons r BRL ug/L 200� ;CAS,Number�. ' " Targef'Analytes:H,v •,_ w :` . "Concentration „ ,.„r Unitsz,i (teportrngLirtit 91-20-3 Naphthalene j BRL _ _ ug/L 10 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene BRL ug/L 5 ' 85-01-8 I Phenanthrene I BRL _ ug/L_ 1010 83-32-9 Acenaphthene BRL J ug/L 10J "QGSurrogate Compounds , t - Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 82 % _ 40-140 2-Bromonaphthalene 83 % _ _ 40- 140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane —�' 66 % 40- 140% ' ortho Terphenyl 85 % _ _ 40 140 C Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. ' The accompanying cover letter, project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest ' f concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or-internal standards eluting it ' that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FI D Field ID: MW-2 Laboratory ID: 32506-02 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0635-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 04-06-00 Container: 1L Amber Glass Received: 04-06-00 Preservation: pH<2 1-12SO4/Received on Ice Extracted: 04-18-00 ' Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 04-20-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 APH+Ranges . Reporting limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t _ BRL ug/L 540 ' n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons — _ BRL ug/L 540- n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 200 " Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons} T— BRL ug/L 000 ' "CAS'Number -Target'Analytesjt` ,,, .t, "Con_centration � .Units` :,' Reportmg.Gmit j 91-20-3 1 Naphthalene BRL _ ug/L 11 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene _BRL _ ug/L 5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene _ _ BRL _ -1.19/1. j 83-32-9 Acenaphthene j BRL I CSurr .te:6rri unds Q �� Limits =�� Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 90 % 40- 140% " 2-Bromonaphthalene _ 80 % __� 40- 140%_— Extraction: Chloro-octadecane j _ _ 85 % _ 1 40- 140 ' Lortho Terphenyl �— _8 _ 40 140% ' ' r. s S z s x L 8 % I QA/QC.Certification 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes' 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report___ Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest ! concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range.- 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. 1 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method 1 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GGFID Field ID: MW-3 Laboratory ID: 32506-03 ' Project: Birmingham/8099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0635-F. Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 04-06-00 Container: 1L Amber Glass Received: 04-06-00 Preservation: pH<2 H2SO4/Received on Ice Extracted: 04-18-00 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 04-20-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic: 1 Aromatic:1 `EPH;Ranges Concentration Ma' .Units,,. Reporting Cimit � � .,. �... n n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 540 ' n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL - ug/L 540 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 610 _ ug/L 220 " Una—& n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 720 ug/L 220 ;CAS+Number ;u' . ,Target6Analytes Cdnc`entra#ion ` l7nits Reporting! mi4 1 91-20-3 I Naphthalene _ BRL ; _ug/L 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene 87 ug/L 5 85-01-8 Phenanthrene BRL � --- ug/L--I—. 11.-- 83-32-9 A aec nn phthene BRL t ug/L_ _ 11__� Q ga po ridsR'ecoveryr, xi ,zFQC Limits v, C SUrro te`COm u ii r_ 5 Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 83 % 40-140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene j _ 85 % _ 40- 140 % Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 74 % 40- 140 % ortho Terphenyl �— —_84 % 40 140% _,. ':, QA/QC Certification si 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes ! 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. ` Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ' ANALYTICAL Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Lab ID: 32506 ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Received: 04-06-00 A `Physical Condition of Samples) m�� # n tip` This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition. The sample(s) were received undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation. r B ProlectDocumentation This project was accompanied by satisfactory Chain of Custody documentation,, with the following amendment(s) or correction(s): 1. Samples 32506-01 through —03 for analysis by MA DEP Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons were filtered prior to analysis as indicated on the Chain of Custody. C ..Analysis of Sample(s) —J ' No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were noted b the laboratory during the processing of the Y Y rY g P g se sample(s). All data contained-within this report are released without qualification. t r Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 228 Main Street,P.O.Box 1200 GROUNDWATER Buzzards Bay,MA02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ANALYTICAL Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER N° '41517 FAX(508)759-4475 �oject Name: Firm: ��: ^ p yt r\p-}.�=q �� TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST Project Numb j�TANDARD(10 Business Days) H WelilCs semivetatilee Peaieese ceas P,troleam eor,m,e xar. Address: Metals t Wastese General Chemistry Diner n � Y ❑ PRIORITY(5 Business Days) s fI"I Il[J S 5 0 e ❑ RUSH(RAN- ) x � � � �A $ � (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) Sampler Name: City/State/Zip: on _ a Please FAX (` YES ❑ NO 1 FAX Number: o _ a Project Man er: Telephone: - - 9 BILLING a �� f s Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: _ INSTRUCTIONS:Use separat ine for each container(except replicates), as �� Sampling _ S i o X - __ e P 9 Matrix Type Container(s) Preservation3 $ $ - - F d t Filtered r_• _ — SAMPLE _ A _ - 9 = _ LABORATORY _ _' 8 a IDENTIFICATION a e _ - NUMBER - g - - - m g ' = asio w. o w z = '^ o m (Lab U a x a = _ 5 > > 5 a _ Use Only) - �I _ I (5 ) c REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Regulatory Program Project Specific QC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. Q.SLJL-r ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require ro'ect Relinquished by Sampler: Date Time Received by: Receipt Temperature: ❑MA DEP Form. specific OC.Project specific OC includes Sample Duplicates. t ' -!$�L1�-�� Uk+• -^"' ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory OC is G�b I�(� F D r Specify state: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific OC AM❑ CRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples, 7RI1,uish b t Time R "ad by: Shipping/Airbill A MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional �� Number: Rep nable Concentrations sample aliquot. !% 3'r{6 - RCGW.1 ❑RCS-1 Project Specific OC Required Selection of OC Sample q1e by to• Tim Received by La r tory: Custody Seal/ ❑RCGW-2❑RCS-2 Cooler Serial ❑Sample Duplicate ❑Selected by laboratory ' ❑MA Dredge Disposal Z C-- Number: ❑NH❑RI❑CT O ME G Matrix Spike ❑Please use sample: f Shipment: Courier ❑Express Mail Federal Expres sit Specify Category: ❑Matrix Spike Duplicate ❑ PS 0 Hand 0 - GROUNDWATER II ANALYTICAL Quality Assurance/Quality Control " -� - - "• m, A w Program Overview �� , i Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high quality, valid data. This program closely follows the`guidance provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update LII (1996). Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) developed for each analytical method. SOPS are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. ' All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GUMS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing - calibration standard. GC/MS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily, or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent.- Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for.each sample preparation batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. B.. Definitions Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time,.up to but not exceeding 24 hours. 1 Laboratory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or ' expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate ' steps of an analytical method. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of ' interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 3 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample Category: MA DEP EPH Method 1 QC Batch ID: EP-0635-F Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L 1 C;45`.Nu`"tuberAnalyte� Spikedp„" Measured, „4^ Recovery is 111-84-2 n-Nonane(C9) 50 25 49% 40-140% 629-59-4 n-Tetradecane(C14) 50 33 67% 40-140% 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(C79) 50 36 72 % 40-140% 112-95-8 n-Eicosane(C20) 50 39 79% 40-140% 630-02-4 n-Octacosane(C28) 50 39 77% 40-140% r ' 91-20-3 Naphthalene 50 29 58% 40- 140 83-32-9 Acenaphthene 50 33 65 % 40- 140 .; .QC'Surrogate Cor"rtpounds QC 1 Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 75 % 40- 140%� 2-Bromonaphthalene 76 % _ 40- 140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 66 % - 140% ortho-Terphenyl 75 % 40- 140% 1 Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). ' Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, 1 or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. i 1 1 1 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 a GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Quality Control Report Method Blank Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-0635-F Matrix: Aqueous ' r EPH1Ranges , .'" .,_ ,. , ,v ...,.Concentr`a#ion ;..M , µ ". ,Units' Reporting:Limif n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L I 500 l n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 200 ' Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons f BRL ug/L 200 y„G45'NumberConcentration Unit's'w r Reportmg,`kimit 91-20-3 Naphthalene --- — BRL ug/L 10 � 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene _ __ BRL _ ug/L 5 r 85-01-8 I Phenanthrene_ __ BRL _ ( g/ 83-32-9 Acenaphthene -- _ — BRL ug/L 10 l 14 t Taw`QC-SurrogateCompounds x ,-` a ,$ t k:Reco�ery t "}_' fr;,QC Limits" ; Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl _ _— _ _ 76 % j 40- 140% ' - 2-Bromonaphthalene— j --- 78 % _—�-- 40= 140 action: Chloro-octadecane 64 % 40- 140 � �ortho-Terphenyl - —�— 76 % 40- 140% ' Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any,is below reporting limit for anaiyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sampie dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting ii that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. t Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 1 GROUNDWATER r ANALYTICAL ' Certifications and Approvals CONNECTICUT. Department of Health Services, Pli 0586 F " ` s s Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste,Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved ' Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead, Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,-Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. MAINE' Department.,of Human.Services MA103° f� ,� ; � . Drinking Water y Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. ' Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for wastewater analytes. ' ,MASSACHUSETTS,.Department;of,Environrnental Protection, M-MA 103 s 'I Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N;Fluoride, rSodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity;Total Dissolved Solids,pH;Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform,Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water ' Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium;Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium, Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrir,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated ' Biphenyls(water),Polychlorinated Biphenyls(oil). MICHIGAN, Department.of Environmental Quality at a« ' Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 NEW HAMPSHIRE, Department-of Environmental Services,t202798 2Z� 1 Drinking Water ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite•N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,-Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium, Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N;Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. ' �RHODE ISLAND, De arti�nent of Health 54 4g P Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage rChemistry: Organic and Inorganic r ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 JUIU g 20GO GROUNDWATER Groundwater Analytical,Inc. P.O.Box 1200 ANALYTICAL 228 Main Street ' Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 Telephone(508)759-4441 FAX(508)759-4475 June 7, 2000 Ms. Kara Shumway Bennett & O'Reilly, Inc. P.O. Box 1667 Brewster, MA 02631 ' Project: Birmingham/BO99-2533 Lab I D: 33552 Sampled: 05-30-00 ' Dear Kara: Enclosed are the Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses performed^for the above referenced project. This project was processed for Priority One Week turnaround. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results, and should be considered a part of this ' report. This report contains a project narrative indicating project changes and non-conformances, a brief description of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures employed by our laboratory, ' and a statement of our state certifications. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals. t immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Y Sincerely, Jonathan R. Sanford President J RS/awc Enclosures i GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GOFI D Field ID: MW-1 Laboratory ID: 33552-01 Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 - QC Batch ID: EP-0662-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 05-30-00 Container: I Amber Glass Received: 05-31-00 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 06-01-00 Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 06-06-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 �j�EPHRanges ' ' t@oncentration lJn�ts R" orGn limit n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 560 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 560 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L. 200 r ' Unadjusted n-C11 ton C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 200 f„ QC Surrogate GompOunds - _ •; � *. Recovery �,. ,� QC=Umits � Fractionation: 2-Fluor biphenyl 70 % 40-140% ' 2-Bromonaphthalerie 70 % 40-140 % Extraction: L Chloro-octadecane 81 % 40-1400/6 ortho-Terphenyl 78 % 40- 140% �'.9z'S"..T�`.°J d' ¢ kUa d..-;maZD b s +- r 1'vss ,+ ' '� ��, A/. G Ce tfication xM, t��< .. ..a,-.,..,.r�.�?�:..,t�` .r,.. ;.F��,. ,��:��,.a�'�� ¢�^�"rQ.. Q rk ,.��.. 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all perform ance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed ' utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for.analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. ' Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. i F II e Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 r ' GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-2 Laboratory ID: 33552-02 Project: Birmingham/13099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0662-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 05-30-00 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 05-31-00 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 06-01-00 ' Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 06-06-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 �,,., .;-��ri�.,�z�.r� Units5 Reporting LimrE n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 590 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 590 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 200 Y Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons r BRL ug/L 200 # �., " QC�SUFCOgdtICOmpOUnd,Sg Tyr )RecoVery� e Fractionation: 2-Fluor biphenyl 76 % 40 140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 70 % 40- 140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 81 % 40- 140% ortho-Terphenyl 85 % 40- 140% t ` t" 4 L, F'r f s4°� cz 3AA�a/�)C,Cetrfrcation ,# aeF} r ': .y '? •Tin �` ` yC M�.i'' i a�v(..W% .,,,..n M13wa`ee 2-fF�.,�'�>+ I3 k ��redx.'^ 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed- , utilizing separatory funnel technique. . Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. ' t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any'surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Y Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street,Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-3 Laboratory ID: 33552-03 ' Project: Birmingham/BO99-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0662-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 05-30-00 Container: 1L Amber Glass Received: 05-31-00 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 06-01-00 ' Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 06-06-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 n .a "�� „�� '. ': �Concentratton ��' -�tUn�ts ��? xReportmg limat ' n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 530 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 530 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 360 ug/L 210 Ln ted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t 420 ug/L 210 xQC Surrogate Compounds„ a �,ri >. g ;Recovery .$ =� .QC�Lrmts� Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 72 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 70 % 40 140 Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 77 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl "" 71 % 40-140% 'i ��) ,.�..' �.,-. . ,3m,�,,r 5: v!�<•t:.., -,v.�: ..a..z:.�.:,.�' .,.,. „ sr w��,.r.��"�"` ..<�m „t�.�r.,a',,.h ' 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes y 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No ' Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. r - a 1 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 t GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-4 Laboratory ID: 33552-04 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0662-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 05-30-00 Container: 1L Amber Glass Received: 05-31-00 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted:. 06-01-00 ' Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 06-06-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 _ n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 200 ' Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons t BRL ug/L 200 Fractionation: 2-Fluor biphenyl 69 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 60 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 89 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 82 % 40- 140% �a .t- sue;" L i;°a�`. w °§S'A/ C CCftlflCatlOnt rk= r ro111 x � 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3? No ' Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. ' t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Massachusetts DEP EPH Method ' Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID Field ID: MW-5 Laboratory ID: 33552-05 ' Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 QC Batch ID: EP-0662-F Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Sampled: 05-30-00 Container: 1 L Amber Glass Received: 05-31-00 Preservation: H2SO4/Cool Extracted: 06-01-'00 ' Matrix: Aqueous Analyzed: 06-07-00 Dilution Factor: Aliphatic:1 Aromatic:1 Concentration rkUmts� Reporting Limit ' n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L. 200 Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons} B R L ug/L I 200 ' ;,µQG,Su'rrogateCompounds ' `Recovery .. „QCLimits Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 77 % 40-140% 2-Bromonaphthalene 70 % 40-140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecan,e 83 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 81 % 40-140,p% k.z_?;,, G', mac.§e"3 '+ .,.`°r".:;.F ✓a`.,.k ,°y ' a 4'. h,Q/vQ,C,Ce ttfication "'r `' e i r.. r s`-`**�§�a" `2�"t+..✓. 7�'1�..`;#e'',,*;r„cki." ^ t 1. Were all QA/QC procedures required by the method followed? Yes 2. Were all performancelacceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? Yes 3. Were any significant modifications made to the method,as specified in Section 11.3?. No ' Method non-conformances indicated above are detailed below on this data report,or in the accompanying project narrative and project quality control report. Release of this data is authorized by the accompanying signed project cover letter. The accompanying cover letter,project narrative and quality control report are considered part of this data report. Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Extraction performed utilizing separatory funnel technique. Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration,if any,is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogates)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. 0 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. s t Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 1 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Project Narrative Project: Birmingham/B099-2533 Lab ID: 33552 ' Client: Bennett&O'Reilly Received: 05-31-00 This project was received by the laboratory in satisfactory condition. The sample(s) were received ' undamaged in appropriate containers with the correct preservation. 1 B Protect Documentation r .a This project was accompanied by satisfactory Chain of Custody documentation, with the following 1 amendment(s) or correction(s): 1. Samples 33552-01 through —05 were filtered prior to analysis as indicated on the Chain of Custody. S w C Analysis"of Samples): T 1 No analytical anomalies or non-conformances were noted by the laboratory during the processing of these sample(s). All data contained within this report are released without qualification. D . 1 1 1 P Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 L GROUNDWATER,-Q,r Buz 228 Main Street,P.O.Box 1200 \� 1� Buzzards Bay,MA 02532 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD N4 42139 ANALYTICAL1l' Telephone(508)759-4441 AND WORK ORDER FAX(508)759-4475 Project Name: Firm: TURNAROUND ANALYSIS REQUEST - - �' Volallles Samlvolallles Pes eN CBs Petmteum tlmcer0oa Hax. OBusinessDays) Ezlmctal Vo. Metals xTPH o.TP Waste GeneralCAemislry OIAar Project N m j t u b Addres : � � z < —�\ T '��n Y PRIORITY(5 Business Days) E 0 9 a .1 J I_ {`�/v) l ❑ RUSH(RAN- 1 (Rush requires Rush Authorization Number) o ❑ ❑ a # ❑ ❑ Sampler Name: City/State/Zip: r J Please FAX &OYES ❑NO1jy)0 r ea tye02— J FAX Number: ❑- 9r Project Manager. Telephone(: BILLING o 0 0 0 0 0 0 d - l I b`- � (161&30 Purchase Order No.: GWA Reference No.: © 2 33 D SO o a INSTRUCTIONS:Use sep r to line for each container(except replicates). g ' s a ❑ 0 5 a o Sampling Matrix Type Contalner(s) Preservation Rue etl ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ o o a o 8 0 2 o o s SAMPLE _ LABORATORY W 0 r G _ s 8 0 " o 0 IDENTIFICATION a a a - ' a NUMBER �¢' W _ g .a a i - e g � o ❑ c o € 5 a in a (Lab Use Only) 5 < i g t > d W ❑ o 3 N o e E a € E s m s _ _ g m s s " a s m ^Z ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑N ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ �i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 11'05 — Z M Z. ti e 1' . I e+ .t 1 REMARKS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD �^ ^ Regulatory Program Project Specific OC NOTE:All samples submitted subject to Standard Terms and Conditions on reverse hereof. ^^� ❑Safe Drinking Water Act Many regulatory programs and EPA methods require project Reli uishe y Sampler: Date Time Received by: Receipt Temperature: ❑MA DEP Form specific QC.Project specific QC includes Sample Duplicates, r ❑NPDES/Clean Water Act Matrix Spikes,and/or Matrix Spike Duplicates.Laboratory QC is e Q Specify State: not project specific unless prearranged.Project specific QC a ❑RCRA/Haz.Waste Char. samples are charged on a per sample basis.For water samples, Reli quish y: ' at Time eceiv by///��) Shipping/Airbill 2gAAA MCP(310 CMR 40) each MS,MSD and Sample Duplicate requires an additional Number: - Reponable Concentrations sample aliquot. fj� T" *CGW-1 ❑RCS-1 Project Specific QC Required Selection of QC Sample uis by: le Time Received ato : Custody Seal/ RCGW-2❑RCS-2 S Cooler Serial ❑Sample Duplicate ❑Selected by laboratory 3y �'� N,2�' Number: ❑NH Dredge Disposal ❑Matrix Spike ❑Please use sampler ❑NH❑RI❑CT❑ME Method of hi ment: GWA Courier❑Express Mail ❑Federal Express Specify Category: ❑Matrix Spike Duplicate- ❑UPS ❑Hand ❑ GROUNDWATER ` ANALYTICAL Quality Assurance/Quality Control " n xsr ' A A -frogra Overnew w Ae s :w , .y? Groundwater Analytical conducts an active Quality Assurance program to ensure the production of high quality, valid data. This program closely follows the guidance -provided by Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, US EPA QAMS-005/80 (1980), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, US EPA, SW-846, Update III (1996). Quality Control protocols include written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) developed for each analytical method. SOPs are derived from US EPA methodologies and other established references. y Standards are prepared from commercially obtained reference materials of certified purity, and documented for traceability. Quality Assessment protocols for most organic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory control sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. All samples, standards, blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes and sample duplicates are spiked with internal standards and surrogate compounds. All instrument sequences begin with an initial calibration verification standard and a blank; and excepting GUMS sequences, all sequences close with a continuing ' calibration standard. GUMS systems are tuned to appropriate ion abundance criteria daily,.or for each 12 hour operating period, whichever is more frequent. Quality Assessment protocols for most inorganic analyses include a minimum of one laboratory"control ' sample, one method blank, one matrix spike sample, and one sample duplicate for each sample preparation batch. Standard curves are derived from one reagent blank and four concentration levels. Curve validity is verified by standard recoveries within plus or minus ten percent of the curve. 6 a Definitions Batches are used as the basic unit for Quality Assessment. A Batch is defined as twenty or fewer samples of the same matrix which are prepared together for the same analysis, using the"same lots of reagents and the same techniques or manipulations, all within the same continuum of time, up to but not exceeding 24 hours. Laborhtory Control Samples are used to assess the accuracy of the analytical method. A Laboratory Control Sample consists of reagent water or sodium sulfate spiked with a group of target analytes representative of the . method analytes. Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of the measured value with the true or expected value. Percent Recoveries for the Laboratory Control Samples are calculated to assess accuracy. Method Blanks are used to assess the level of contamination present in the analytical system. Method Blanks consist of reagent water or an aliquot of sodium sulfate. Method Blanks are taken through all the appropriate ' steps of an analytical method.. Sample data reported is not corrected for blank contamination. Surrogate Compounds are used to assess the effectiveness of an analytical method in dealing with each sample matrix. Surrogate Compounds are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes of interest in chemical behavior, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Percent Recoveries are calculated for each Surrogate Compound. ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Laboratory Control Sample ' Category: MA DEP EPH Method QC Batch ID: EP-0662-FL Matrix: Water Units: ug/L a saw x s �� q� ':4 s a ,,CAS Number + „ z Anal �{e Spiked Measured b ( RecouerV �2QG Umits .�`...�'r,<- ,T;�q,:2rZg F -'` �, �.r,,. ry, 111-84-2 n-Nonane(C9) 50 20 40% 40-140% 629-59-4 n-Tetradecane(04) 50 34 67% 40-140 % ' 629-92-5 n-Nonadecane(C19) 50 37 74% 40-140% 112-95-8 n-Eicosane(C20) 50 38 77% 40-140% r 630-02-4 n-Octacosane(C28) 50 36 73 % 40-140% ' G Surro te.:Com ndSr mi;, q as c m f P � RecoveryF QCl�mits<, s Fractionation: I 2-Fluorobiphenyl 73 % 40- 140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene 66 % 40- 140 % ' Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 77 % 40- 140% ortho-Terphenyl 79 % 40-140% Method Reference: Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). ' Report Notations: All calculations performed prior to rounding. Quality Control Limits are defined by the methodology, or alternatively based upon the historical average recovery plus or minus three standard deviation units. t 1 Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 r— GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL ' Quality Control Report Method Blank ' Category: MA DEP EPH.Method - QC Batch ID: EP-0662-FB Matrix: Water ' n-C9 to n-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C19 to n-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 500 n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 200 ' Unadjusted n-C11 to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons BRL ug/L 200 :`4" ' 0-015 rrog Mll-p unds Fractionation: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 78 % 40-140 % 2-Bromonaphthalene 61 % 40- 140% Extraction: Chloro-octadecane 84 % 40-140% ortho-Terphenyl 86 % 40 140 % Method Reference: Method for the.Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons,MA DEP(1998). Report Notations: BRL Indicates concentration, if any, is below reporting Limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest ' concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. t Hydrocarbon range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting it that range. ' 0 n-C11, to n-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range data excludes the method target analyte concentrations. r Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Certifications and Approvals ' CONNECTICUT, D°epartrrtent of HealthServices;PH 0 6 � Potable Water,Wastewater/Trade Waste,Sewage/Effluent,and Soil pH,Conductivity,Acidity,Alkalinity,Hardness,Chloride,Fluoride,Ammonia,Kjeldahl Nitrogen,Nitrate,Nitrite,Orthophosphate,Total Dissolved ' Solids,Cyanide,Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Total Chromium,Hexavalent Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead; Magnesium,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Potassium,Selenium,Silver,Sodium,Thallium,Tin,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,Purgeable Halocarbons,Purgeable Aromatics,Pesticides,PCBs,PCBs in Oil,Ethylene Dibromide,Phenols,Oil and Grease. ' MAINE, Department of Human Services; MA103 Drinking Water y Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for drinking water analytes. ' Waste Water Reciprocal certification in accordance with Massachusetts certification for waste water analytes. °'MASSACHUS ronmental Protection, Potable Water Antimony,Arsenic,Barium,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Copper,Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium,Thallium,Nitrate-N,Nitrite-N,Fluoride, ' Sodium,Sulfate,Cyanide,Turbidity,Residual Free Chlorine,Calcium,Total Alkalinity,Total Dissolved Solids,pH,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organic Compounds,1,2-Dibromoethane,1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane,Total Coliform,Fecal Coliform,Heterotrophic Plate Count,E-Coli Non-Potable Water Aluminum,Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Cadmium,Chromium,Cobalt,Copper,Iron,Lead,Manganese,Mercury,Molybdenum,Nickel,Selenium,; Silver,Strontium,Thallium,Titanium,Vanadium,Zinc,pH,Specific Conductance,Total Dissolved Solids,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium, Sodium,Potassium,Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Kjeldahl-N,Orthophosphate,Total Phosphorus,Chemical Oxygen Demand,Biochemical Oxygen Demand,Total Cyanide,Non-Filterable Residue,Total Residual Chlorine,Oil and Grease,Total Phenolics, Volatile Halocarbons,Volatile Aromatics,Chlordane,Aldrin,Dieldrin,DDD,DDE,DDT,Heptachlor,Heptachlor Epoxide,Polychlorinated ' Biphenyls(water) Polychlorinated Biphenyls(oil) viron MICHIGAN Department of Enmental�Q ua hty ` ' Drinking Water Trihalomethanes,Regulated and Unregulated Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2;1,2-Dibromoethane,.1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane by EPA Method 504.1 ;f_EW'HAMPSHIRE;yDepartment'of EnvironmentallSe rv�ces; 202798 _ ,.=w. .....L6..fi m _ ...... ,. Drinking Water ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,Nitrite-N,Orthophosphate,Residual Free Chlorine,Turbidity,Total Filterable Residue,Calcium Hardness,pH,Alkalinity,Sodium,Sulfate,Total Cyanide,Insecticides,Herbicides,Base/Neutrals,Trihalomethanes,Volatile Organics,Vinyl Chloride,DBCP,EDB,Nitrate-N. Wastewater ' Metals by Graphite Furnace,Metals by ICP,Mercury,pH,Specific Conductivity,TDS,Total Hardness,Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium, Total Alkalinity,Chloride,Fluoride,Sulfate,Ammonia-N,Nitrate-N,Orthophosphate,TKN,Total Phosphorus,COD,BOD,Non-Filterable Residue, Oil&Grease,Total Phenolics,Total Residual Chlorine,PCBs in Water,PCBs in Oil,Pesticides,Volatile Organics,Total Cyanide. RHODE ISLAND, Department ofHealth, 54 r s , :< ...+�._.ar,,.. ., ,'?", Surface Water,Air,Wastewater, Potable Water,Sewage ' Chemistry: Organic and Inorganic ' Groundwater Analytical, Inc., P.O. Box 1200, 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 I � 1 1 1 APPENDIX E � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BENNETT ATO'REILLY, Inc. Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street Sanitary 21EJSite Remediation Property Line PO Box 1667 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision Brewster MA 02631Q Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 ' Water Supply Consulting Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL PLAN ' Quality Assurance and Quality Control Program For Soil and Groundwater Remediation Plan ' INTRODUCTION This Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Program outlines the purpose, policies, organization and operations to support sampling work conducted by BENNETT & OREILLY, INC. ' Implementation of this program will help ensure the validity of data used to provide professional engineering and environmental opinions to clients. ' The following definitions are used in the QA/QC Program: Quality Assurance refers to the concepts used in defining a system for verifying and ' maintaining a desired level of quality in a product or process. Quality Control is a specific, step=by-step description of how the Quality Assurance r Program will be carried out. ' This QA/QC Program guides field sampling activities. Project-specific QA/QC Programs are adopted when warranted. Modifications to this QA/QC Program may be made only after specific approval by the QA/QC Officer(Project Manager). 1 The specific objectives of the QA/QC Program are to: ' 1. specify the level of quality of each field procedure used in collecting samples; 2. identifydeficiencies in field procedures which might affect the quality of P P� q tY data; and 3. require sufficient documentation to verify the credibility of the sampling , methods employed. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY ' The Project Manager of BENNETT& O'REILLY, INC. is responsible for the quality of work produced. The Project Manager directs the QA/QC Program to document the control of field efforts and resulting data. In this capacity, the Project Manager is expected to do the following. 1. prepare detailed Quality Control Plans; 2. obtain analytical and sampling procedure reference materials;' 3. ensure that all field test and measurement equipment is maintained and calibrated ' properly; ' 4. monitor quality assurance activities to ensure conformance with authorized policies, ' procedures, and sound practices, and recommend improvements as necessary; ' 5. ensure that all field sampling is conducted in accordance with guidelines contained herein; oversee all field sampling efforts to detect conditions which might directly or indirectly jeopardize the utility of resulting analytical data, such as improper calibra- tion of equipment or cross contamination through improper storage of samples; ' 7. ensure that sample handling Procedures are adequate for the sample types received, and, 8. inspect the quality of purchased sampling materials. 2 ' SAMPLE MANAGEMENT, COLLECTION,AND PREPARATION Introduction ' The procedures in this section are designed to ensure collection of samples which truly represent the matrix being sampled by eliminating trace levels of contaminants from external sources. Sample management and stringent documentation are essential for successful quality assurance. ' Sample Management ' The management of samples, up to the point of delivery to the laboratory for analysis, is under the supervision of the Project Manager,who shall ensure that samples are collected, labeled,preserved, stored, and transported according to the prescribed methods. If significant deviations from the ' sampling protocol occur, resulting in a suspected compromise of the sample integrity, all samples taken during that sampling effort prior to correction of the procedure will be discarded and fresh samples taken. ; In the field sampling effort, control samples (duplicates and blanks) are introduced into the sample set or batch. Random introduction of control samples is typically accomplished during the logging ' in process without leaving such clues as a sudden perturbation in the sequence of laboratory numbers or the appearance of a cleaned up extract in a round of soil samples. Sample Collection Ground water Monitoringwells will be sampled in accordance with the following sampling procedures: P g p g ' 1. Identify the well and record the well number on the ground water sampling record. 2. Open the well cap and measure organic vapor levels at the wellhead with the use of a ' portable organic vapor analyzer. Record levels detected. 3. Measure ground water level to the nearest 0.01 foot from the top of the well riser ' pipe using an electric water level indicator. Record water level on a Monitoring Well Sampling Log(attached). Water level indicators will be decontaminated between wells. 4. The volume of standing water in the well casing will be calculated and recorded on the Monitoring Well Sampling Log. At least three well volumes will be purged by ' pump, separate pre-cleaned polyethylene tubing will be used in each well., 3 5. Samples will be collected using a bailer. Samples will be transferred from the bailer ' .and poured into containers,taking care as to minimize agitation of the sample. 6. Sample containers will be properly labeled with tags provided by the laboratory. Samples will be logged in on a sample log sheet and a chain-of-custody form. 7. Samples taken for precipitate metal analysis will be acidified to a pH of less than 2.0 ' in the field. When sampling water for volatile compounds, care must be exercised to prevent loss of compound ' through evaporation. Precautionary measures include: 1. preventing aeration of the sample with the atmosphere or any other gas; 2. filling bottles to capacity with sample and securing cap without entraining air bubbles; ' 3. placin g g samples on ice (approximately 4 Q immediately after collection; and, 4. analyzing sample as soon as possible within the specific holding times after collec- tion. ' Soils When collecting and screening soil samples, the procedures to be used are: 1. Prior to sampling surficial locations, surface vegetation, rocks, leaves and debris will be cleared from the sample point to allow collection of a clean soil sample. ' Surface soil samples, if taken, will be taken with the use of a hand trowel or shovel P o el and spatula. The sampling equipment will be decontaminated as outlined below. 2. Boring samples will be taken b drill rig-operated s lit s oon procedures. Soil YP P samples collected from excavations or test pits will be collected directly with a hoe ' (if necessary)from grade to approximately four feet below grade. Samples collected at deeper depths will be obtained directly from the bucket of the backhoe. A stain- less steel spatula will be used to remove soil from the backhoe bucket for placement in the appropriate sample containers. Soil samples for HNU-101 volatile organic field screening will be placed in glass soil jars with aluminum foil placed under the screw cap. Samples will be allowed to warm to ambient temperature before screening or will be screened in a heated vehicle - after warming. The jar will be shaken for fifteen seconds prior to warming and after warming to ensure proper headsp ace development. 4 3. Soil samples will be stored and shipped in appropriate sealed containers. ' 4. Sample containers will be marked to indicate sampling date, time, location,and depth. Samples will be logged in or chain-of-custody forms (copy attached). 5. The stratigraphy of each soil boring and test pit excavation, and the construction of each monitoring well will be recorded by the on-site geologist on the appropriate soil boring/monitoring well installation log,or test pit field log(copies attached). Soil sampling equipment(trowel, shovel, or spatula) will be decontaminated between each sampling ' location with a potable water rinse, alconox soap wash, potable water rinse,and final potable water rinse. Drilling and excavating apparatus (augers, rods, casing, core barrels, backhoe bucket, and other equipment coming in contact with the borehole or excavation) will be decontaminated between each boring and excavation via steam cleaning. If necessary, an alconox soap wash{followed by a steam ' cleaning will be included. SAMPLE PRESERVATION Procedures ' To prevent or retard the degradation/modification of chemicals in water samples during transit and P g storage, the samples will be preserved by refrigeration at or below 4 C and stored.in glass bottles with Teflon-lined lids. Samples containing inorganic compounds will be stored in plastic polyethyl- ene containers. Samples will be delivered to the laboratory by courier or by overnight delivery service. DATA MANAGEMENT 4 Logging of Samples The accountability of a sample begins when the sample is taken from its natural environment. ' Sample handling(chain-of-custody) records must-be completed at the time of sampling(refer to Figure 1). The following chain-of-custody procedure must be implemented by the Field Team Leader to assure sample integrity. 1. The samples are under custody of the Field Team Leader if. a. they are in his (or her)possession; b. they are in view after being in possession; c. they are locked up or sealed securely to prevent tampering; or; d.they are in a designated secure area. . 5 2. The original of the sample handling form must accompany the samples at all times after collection. A copy of the sample handling form is kept by the Field Team Leader. 3. When samples are transferred in possession,the individuals relinquishing and ' receiving will sign, date, and note the time on the form. The Sampling Handling Record will contain information to distinguish each sample from any other ' sample. This information will include: ' 1. the project for which sampling is being conducted; 2. the matrix being sampled(air, ground water, soil, etc.);, P 3. the sampling date and time; 4. field sample identification number and chain-of-custody identification number; 5. the number and type of containers and the type of preservative used (if any); and, 6. signature of the person performing the sampling. ' Each sample will be assigned a unique identification number, which will be marked on the sample container. The sample handling record will be forwarded to'the laboratory with the samples. As a ' precaution against this record being lost or altered,the sampling personnel will retain a copy of the sampling handling record documenting all information up until the first change of sample custody. This record will be filed by the Project Manager. Sample Identification Numbers ' Reportingof date to the data management system will require the assignment of a unique - g y q gn que identifica- tion number to each sample collected (including quality control samples). A record will be ' maintained by the Project Manager to associate the field sample with the various identification numbers used to analyze the field sample. Specific sample identification procedures are developed for each field sampling effort by the Project Manager. 6 l ' BENNETT & OREILLY Inc. 1573 Main Street,P.O. Box 1667 Brewster,MA 02631 Engineering and Environmental Services (508) 896-6630 1 MONFOR WELL SAMPLING LOG CLIENT DATE(S) LOCATION JOB # v MEASURING POINT SAMPLER GROUNDSURFACE OR T.O.C. Well Elev. of Total Depth to Standing Water Static Volume HNU Comments ' Number reference Depth of Water Water Table Volume Purged PI-101 point Well (Feet) Height Elevation (gallons) (gallons) (ppm) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) NOTES: 1 BENNETT & O'REILLY Inc. Sheet - of 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 ' PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster, MA 02631 Sieve Analysis Data and Computation Sheet Job Number: Date: Job Name: Sample Number: ' Sample Collected By: Sample Tested By; „ Y Notes i SIEVE WEIGHT PERCENT CUMULATIVE PROJECT OPENING SIEVE RETAINED RETAINED PERCENT MANUAL MILLI- MESH IN GRAMS (Cumulative) FINER SPECIFICATION METERS (Cumulative) PASSED MESH SIEVE TOTAL ' Sample Weight Wet: ' Sample Weight Dry: Percent Moisture: Sample Weight Passed Through Sieves: 1 . P • BENNETT & O'REILLY Inc. Sheet of 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 Job Number. Date: . Job Name: SAND GRAVEL SILT SAND Test Hole Number: Witness: ' 71 a a Drilling Contractor: PEAT CLAY Sampling Method: GEOLOGIC BOREHOLE LOG Type rinrri PP netrstinnWell Litholo /Sediment • of Blows•per %of � ithology Depth Depth Specification&Remarks Description ' Sample 6"Drive Recovery PID Response 5 (ppm) 10 15 20 25 30 e 35 40 50 - t BENNETT & O'REILLY Inc. REPORTNUMBER: 1573 Main Street 508-896-6630 PO Box 1667 508-896-4687 Fax Brewster,MA 02631 INSPECTORS DAILY RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Job Number: Date: ' Job Name: Feature: Contractor: Type of Work: Weather Conditions: Temperature: Contractor's Work Force(Indicate classification,including Subcontractor personnel) ' Equipment in use or idled(identify which) Materials or equipment delivered,quantity or pay items placed ' Non-conforming materials or work,field problems,inspections of previously reported deficiencies Summary of construction activities 1 1 BENNETT AT REILLY, Inc. Engineering, Environmental & Surveying Services 1573 Main Street ' Sanitary 21FJSite Remediation Property Line Box 1667 Line Brewster MA 02631 Site Development Hydrogeologic Survey Subdivision. , ' Waste Water Treatment Water Quality Monitoring Land Court 508-896-6630 Water Supply Consulting Trial Court Witness 508-896-4687 Fax SOIL TEST REPORT 1 CLIENT: ASSR'S HAP: DATE OF TEST: ' AGENT: PCL: TYPE OF. TEST: ENGINEER: STREET: DEEP HOLE: HEALTH REP: PERC TEST: EXCAVATOR: . TOWN BORING: SOIL. LOGS SKETCS OF LOT (not to scale) 1 TEST TEST 1 1 ' PROPERTY INFORMATION DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: WATER SUPPLY: PERCOLATION RATE: SITE FEATURES-' 1 TEST RESULTS: PURPOSE OF TESTING: ' CERTIFICATION: WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE TESTS WERE PERFORMED AND THE RESULTS ARE AS SHOWN OK THIS REPORT. r� Pesticide and Herbicide Analyses Minimum Recommended Required' Holding Category Methods Qty.1 Container(s)2 Preservation Time' Aqueous Samples Carbamate Pesticides 531.1 60mL 2 x 125 Glass Bottle Cool to 4°C3 28 Days (Drinking Water) w/teflon liner17 Add Sodium Thiosulfate26 Adjust pH to 3 with Monochloroacetic Acid Buffer Organochlorine 608/8080 1 L 2 x 1LAmber Cool to 40C3 7 Days' Pesticides&PCBs Glass Bottle Check pH;Adjust 5-96 ' w/teflon liner" Remove Chlorine? Organochlorine Pesticides 508 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 41C3 7 Days21 &PCBs Glass Bottle Add Sodium Thiosulfate26 (Drinking Water) w/teflon liner17 ' Polychlorinated Biphenyls 508A 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 40C3 14 Days 22 by Perchlorination Glass Bottle (Drinking Water) w/teflon liner" Organohalide Pesticides 505 40 mL 3 x 40 mL Glass Vials Cool to 4°C3 7 Days20 &PCBs w/teflon septa caps17 Add Sodium Thiosulfate26 (Drinking Water) Organophosphorus 614/8140 1 L 2 x iLAmber Cool to 4°C3 7 Days9 Pesticides Glass Bottle Check pH;Adjust 6-86 w/teflon liner17 Remove Chlorine' Chlorinated 615/8150 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 40C3 7 Days' Herbicides Glass Bottle Remove Chlorine' w/teflon liner" Chlorinated Herbicides 515.1 1 L 2 x 1 L Amber Cool to 41C3 14 Days 23 (Drinking Water) Glass Bottle Add Sodium w/teflon liner" Thiosulfate26 Glyphosate 547 40 mL 2 x 40 mL Glass Cool to 40C3 14 Days t (Drinking Water) Vial w/teflon liner Add Sodium Thiosulfate28 Endothall 548.1 100 mL 2 x 125 mL Glass Cool to 4°C3 7 Days 21 (Drinking Water) Bottle w/teflon liner17 HCI to pH<21 Add Sodium Thiosulfate26 Diquat and Paraquat 549.1 250 mL 1 x 1LAmber Cool to 40C3 7 DayS27 (Drinking Water) Glass Bottle H2SO4 to pH<24 w/teflon liner17 Add Sodium Thiosulfate26 EDB and DBCP 504.1 40 mL 3 x 40 mL Glass Cool to 4°C3 14 Days (Drinking Water) Vials w/teflon Add Sodium Thiosulfate26 septa caps 12.17 EDB and DBCP 8011 40 mL 3-x 40 mL Glass Cool to 4°CI 14 Days Vials w/teflon HCI to pH<24 septa caps t2•17 Remove Chlorine' Solid Samples Organochlorine 8080 30 g Glass Jar Cool to 40C3 14 Days10 Pesticides&PCBs w/teflon liner17 Organophosphorus 8140 30 g Glass Jar Cool to 41C3 14 Days/O Pesticides w/teflon liner17 Herbicides 8150 30 g Glass'Jar Cool to 4°C3 14 Days10 w/teflon liner17 EDB and DBCP 8260 log 1 x 125 mL Glass Cool to 4°C3 14 Days Vial w/teflon septa cap 12't7 ORR2x40mLGlass Vials w/teflon septa Gaps 12.13.17 - 28 s # F 33 FG.16.5.14 24.60, 88.26 �e6 F.G. 13.0 36 / f 145 11.0 v T El.12.0 0 � P 2000 Gallon 2 \ 4 13.7/ 13.5 \ Septic Tank Bot.E L 9.0 • 105' __ Exist. I ^* f 11.8 11.6 O Shed r' Bedding as 4,0I Per Title 5 38 11' 85' 12' Exist. / Bottom of Test Hole El.5.0 By S.E.I. ®V Garage / / .� I / / I Feb.1,1999.Clean Granular ' Material.No Ground Water. DEVELOPED PROFILE OF PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM Not to Scale ` 31 1V I I I 1 Finish Grade 1. - — \ Filter L_. 2 �Z1 o� 1 Fabric Compacted F1II tJ / / AuI ; �a u N 1/8'=1/2!' _n 7- Pea Stone Fy :7 ' 1 0 CD � jai � MI _ Leaching s 10- c N ChamberCJ Double Washed '00L. ' I ` V Stone � f. 4!-10" .,� �� / Drive CROSS SECTION OF CHAMBER � I m S, _ >> t1c Sys hG�e°� r o gep. d 7 :NOT TO SCALE 1 0 ` ' �y�St�a9a�F �3�1 �\ d. �. R NOTE: Engineer to Verify Soil Con ltlons at v, Time of System Installation. There are no wetlands within 100 feet of the proposed. leaching facility.CL SULLlVRN rr` PLAN VIEW There are no private potable wells within 150 feet of the proposed septic system. CIVI 3 \\a Scale: 1 50' There is no increase in flow and/or change in use proposed. There are no variances requested or needed. The`proposed.leaching facility is located more than 250 feet of any wetlands. t, NOTES DESIGN DATA _ - 1.Water SupptyForThis Lot is Municipal Water. Single - 7 Bedroom _ .o :. `o,s• „ �%•�.•,;' With no Garbage.Grinder ' 2 Location of Utilities Shown on This Plan Are Approx. Daily Flaw=110 is 7=770 GPD PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM 3 ` At Least 72 Hours Prior to Any Excavation For This Septic Tank:770 GPD x 200%=1540 GPD Project The ContractorShall Make The Required . Use 2000 Gallon Septic Tank 'UPGRADE �4 arker k •. Notif ication to Dig Safe(1-800-322-4844) � D p - 3 The Contractor is Required to Secure Appropriate LEACHING AREA AT Permits From Town Agencies For Construction :70 GPD/0.74=1041 SF Required_ 333 EEL RIVER ROAD e o Defined by This Plan. !i idewal l=Z(12'.+63')2=300 S.F. °01 a HattomArea= I2'x63= 756 S.F 4TERVILLE, MASS .ov - Install Risers as Required to Within 12 of 1056 S.F.S Total Provided �o ° •.o o ° Finished Grade. I LEACHING CHAMBERDESIGN FOR b Cl. hob ,k 5.All Structures 8dried Four Feet or More or Subject All Pipes to be Schedule 40. Use ! • �• LOCUS PLAN to Vehicular Traffic tobe H-20Loading. 7-5000o[.Leaching Chambers ina JOHN a KAREN BIRMINGHAM z 8', • •off., r, n I 6 Septic System to be Installed in Accordance With 12 x 63'Washed Stone Field as Shown ••� D. Scale: l =2000 310CMR15.00 Latest Revision AndTheTownof ^, SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE: FEB. 21.1999 s 4 n o'= Assessors Ma !15 Barnstable Board of Health Regulations -- SULLIVAN ENGINEERING INC u parcel 2 T. All Piping to beSch.40 PVC. OSTERVILLE,MA L� r. �e- i EXIST. .5 I/,/\, SHED 0 / \ ( ' r ` � 1500 Gallon Top El. 13.9 ( \ I ( IY S Septic Tank I Bot.El. 10.9 ' EXIST. Per Title 5 ( \ ml Bedding as �y / r \ / ► / "' GARAG /` l \ PROPOSED SEPTIC UPGRADE Bottom or Test Bole EL 3.5 by S.E.I. ' `SEE SHEET DELVELOPED PROFILE OF PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM Augast2o,2ool.cleaucra..ular no 4 �`�L✓ \ i 00 ; Material.No Groundwater. ul . AREA=2 ACRES f ? / 1 Not to SCole t i f Finish Grade kt o � oFilter Yx 53 / N / , in Fabric --'Compacted Fill tA ' N 1/8'-Ile o ,�,c .,, _ a / }' Pea Stone - c A, Leaching M f i / 1 I I a Chamber 3/4�r—1 1/2 ' Stonee Washed 4!—id � CROSS SECTION OF CHAMBER NOT TO SCALE l NOTES: 0 fi E 1) Engineer to Verify Soil Conditions Time of System Installation. '` a s`! , ` PLAN VIEW at Y T here are no wetlands within 100 feet of the proposed leaching facility. / 2) Engineer to Field Confirm Location There are no private potable wells within 150 feet of the proposed septic system. ':C ` f Scale I 50' of Existing Septic. There are no variances requested or needed. 'l'he proposed leaching facility is located more than 250 feet from any wetlands. .'. . , '• �A°y .:o' NOTES " O, V p •�� • - - - L Water Supply ForThis Lot is Municipal Water. - PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM r m�• 2 Location of Utilities Shown on This Plan Are Approx. At Least 72 Hours Prior to Any Excavation For This UPGRADE FOR PLAYHOUSE /�` arker Proiect The Contractor Shall Make The Required . fb k •• Notification to Dig Safe(I-800-322-4844) AT 3 The Contractor id Required to Secure Appropriate ° 333 EEL RIVER ROAD Permits From Tow�C + � Defined by This Plan''9°""`s For`°°�'r"`'°°^ OSTERVILLE, MASS 4 Install Risers as Required to Within 12'of FOR ,o Finished Grade. JOHN & KAREN BIRMINGHAM b q ° 5.All Structures Buried Four Feet or More or Subject ` SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE: AUGUST 20,2001 LOCUS-PLAN to Vehicular Traffic tobe H-20 Loading. SULLIVAN ENGINEERING INC. ' A • •o — n 6 Septic System to be Installed in Accordance With s i •• o�� Scale- 1 =2000 510 CMR 15.00 Latest Revision And The Townof OSTERVILLE,MASS 1 a ° ` '` Barnstable Board of Health Re ulations r", ;Vl)q 4 s Assessors Map 115 g l SHEET 1 OF 2 •• t• - Di�.r Parcel 2 7. All Piping to beSch,40 PVC. �s+ a q 8t 2-8 I I AIL 5-A I � = 12-2"x19" 12x12 F f f i EyECY�N� 11 x10 = - 7x8 ---------- . I N I The Birmingham Garage 2nd Fo'r Plan z 1 /4"= 1'-0,. }, not for construction T a p Qf j � N i Z J I � I i i N The Birmingham Garage Garage -Plan 1 /4"= 1'-0., C not for construction -------------- --M-1--- - -- _ _ 1 a_ 1 ! 1 - _ Cl � { - — 1 _ qq d - - -- .......gimam. .......... .......__..........T._._........ - -- ........ --_...-- ............ ..............._ ..........................._....................__.................... ---- ____:__.___:__:.____..... ............................_........ . ::::.::::::::::.: ................... : „ - _._.... I d .......................•...............•.. ............ ........._........ _._ i .......................:::.... - ---_-.....-.....- - - 1 -- - - u C1 . I Ibl- 1 I I �I SkI v Qf LEI I I Cl ----- -----� - --- I I Cq� I I I L———————— --� "r i a p UNFINISHED ATTIC ® UNFINISHED ATTIC , F4 UNFINISHED ATTIC b jbam _ �'x1�`CCP.�C� C✓��oeJ�i��-.� 00`1' Ta r A. WEST BAY ,e\J ::• • ; ::•'�' M TI DAL :. �`:i a!r .nay :,.,� • � • "� ��C --��, '#4 arke !Vick,� .High Wr Exist.Pie r,See SE3-1155 B GS • ,ack line SE3-1786 10 S ' '�_ --- __ __ '-`---.-..,.-,_,._� =--,. Ext�T.• BEACH -�•y _ _ � l -►� y` 6 c3 s�a • 110 -- pp 410 t ---�-=� - - /o_ Exist. LOCUS . PLAN Beach �IN. House Sci ale : 1 III 20001 bp0gt01 Sank \\ \ •\ Assessors Mdp 1.115 Pdr eel 9 /p / 1 — — ZONE ai,�..E--i 10_"'"_.-- ,//• / \ \ \ \ \ {✓ � __ ,. ._._..._.._,�-._-._._�__.____ ____ _ _ _ _ w�vtsm t�sritr�learrtall.lwlnei' ZONE B / \ \ \ pA• �o 1 AlKk3 lrtralt JOHN aXAREN BIRMINGHAM 333 EL R1vER ROAb Ott VILLE, MASS. /3 'iiLi peoj.ok!us oluisdi been Issicelio once 4 COndtd o ' Mach 0im �`/ �'"'�"�,�, `. �`•• � 'tyllt}Isr wdl iaa a011ddeed an �.�._........+• v�� \ �� LIEAGN ply" Cott Dw ROOF Ftt,ttdt=� u F � \ PETER �•'v VA" CIVIL A. d s&y X .10 E _ r FtP .y. PQ'J ex!. OV AF tier Finish credo `a in Fabric _Compadad FI I I— dd t Pea Slone LOT A U 2.o1 ArLoaching c 1 a N Chamber Washed I I/2"Dwble — °^ed PLAN VIEW 12'-0 Scale:1 -20 CROSS SLCTION OF CHAMBER NOT TO SG1LL F.G.15.0 F.G. 12.0-13.0 t rl M \ 13.0 10.0 -T••H,- I EL•f_V, IZ.00 � , 1500Gallon Top El.11.0 0 12.7 Septic Tonk 12.5 oaGANlcs i� H�'e9•/O ' -� Bot.El. 8.0 a Not in a Zone of Contributloll I :•c�:,: , ••. 11.2 ILO 3 ORN SANDY L-Or," -/a Bedding as 55 ,, }o`/R 14/:5 Per Tit 5 Groundwater a0E I.2.5 4, Per T.O.B.Groundwater Map 12 Y P C t 511 13RN LOAMY eb � � N . sAN� v oYR. 5/� ��rorn Hjrannis•t�btitb�7�toWarcl OsthMila; Takd a left 6*1 DEVELOhED PROFIL OF R POSED SEPTIC SYSTEM 3q OLIVE yG�-t-OW M�Q. blreCftryns to Slt�: Not to Scale (�_-� Izz C SAND 2.5 Y 4/6 Ostervple Wdst Sarrlstable Ad and folloW to dnd;,Takf�-&)att onto Mein Straat., take i bina +lid i taka i I I4 ohto del piv.,r gold v^mot-el-d,r7v� neRe;N� I�I'S3 - g i � t1tG W�St g8y g T ' DESIGN DATA DEI�'rH• H 9' �i t to Parkdr Ad Ta @�►N ht b NOTES � and house is txn thB N ht�33� LESS THAN Z MIN/INCH 1. Water Supply For This Lot isMunicipal Water. Accessory Structure/Garage 2 Bedroom 2 MY! SULLIVAN6.NGIkMr-RINGINC No Garbage Grinder w%-rNF-SS: D.DRS►,AAP0S/T.o.t3• 2.Location of Utilities Shown on This Plan Are Approx. Daily Flow, 110 x 2 = 220 gpd CLASS I MA-PERIAL._ TEST 4a6t-E PERMIT Q9-s3 At Least 72 Hours Prior to An Excavation For This No CrRC7U NDWA-tTe_{2 RO'I'TOM T,1.1. EL. s.o Project The Contractor Shall Make The Required Septic Tank:220 gpd x 200%=440 gpd NO GFOUND VVA•rMFL Notification to DIG SAFE-I-888-344-�233. Use a 1500 Gallon Septic Tank. CN-eA,ty GRAISIULAR MA-reta\n.L_ --PLAN _ _ LEACHING AREA O -T ' -Z ELRv• 1116,0 By SULI-\VAN ENG.,\N C• SITE P LA N 3.The Contractor is Required to Secure Appropriate t=sc>• I� t 9 q9 Permits From Town Agencies For Construction 220 gpd/0.71= 298 s.f.Required o OFtGANIC'j PROPOSED GARAGE Defined by This Plan. Sidewo 11:2(10 +19' )2= 4 116 s.f. ,1 4.Install Risers as Required to Within 12"of Finished Bottom Area:I O'x 19' = 190 s.f. A I3Rev SAND/ I-oAt�n Grade. 306 s.f.Total Provided. (�n t0YR ''I/3 TES••I'1-10LGt PIMMITwZOOt-s&0 AT 333 EEL RIVER ROAD 5.All Structures Buried Four Feet (4t) or More or LEACHING CHAMBER DESIGN `/h FS I, T �:tsta RN LOAMY OT H 5 OM T, , e%- .O Subject to Vehicular tobeH-20 Loading. d SAND 10YR 5/& NO GROut4o WATF-M All Pipes be Schedule 40 PVC.Use 2 •• CL6.Aty GRANLSLAR MA'�'ER\AL 6.Septic System to be Installed in Accordance With -500 Gallon Leaching Chambers in 3s C 0%-IVE YELLOW MED, ati SULLIVAPI ENG„iNC. OSTERVI LLE , MASS. 310 CMR 15.00 Latest Revision And The Town of IO'x 19' Washed Stone Field as Shown. SAND r-.5 y A,\J(rrr, 20,ZOO 1 FOR Barnstable Board of Health Regulations. 1 1$ pEhTH '-I e'y 7 All Piping tobe Sch.40 PVC. L_�6STN..N 2.MIN.�tN�N JOHN 81 KAREN BIRMINGHAM S.Depth of Inlet Tee Below Flow Line-- IO"Min. eROUN' a'TER °� 1 t91r SCALE: AS SHOWN 'DATE, APRIL 211'2005 Depth of Outlet Tee Below Flow Line:14'Min. With Gas Baffle. SULLIVAN ENGINEERING INC. RlvIS1o1V 10 -51 od I O le-to D Stscs Es-r D�•�-A a OSTERVI LLE, MASS. ATTACHMENT A 98128 �..