The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0042 FALLING LEAF LANE - Health 42 Falling Leaf Lane .,DSTERV.. Osterville - _ - - A = 144 003002 IN F T i. I 1' Holmes and Mcgrath, inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL civil engineers and land surveyors 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 DATE 1/6/2022 JOBNo. 217102 falmouth, ma. 02540 ATfENMN 508-548-3564 • 800-874-7373 • FAX 508-548-9672 email:Icoelho@holmesandmcgrath.com RE: Mr. Paul J. Freehauf #42 Falling Leaf Lane To: DEP Osterville, MA 02655 Attn: Title 5 Program 1 Winter Street, 61'Floor Boston, MA 02108 WE ARE SENDING YOU ®Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 11/4/21 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M form. REMARKS: COPY TO: Barnstable Board of Health Paul J. Freehauf SIGNED: Luis Coelho i Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 ' DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) A. Installation Important:When Mr. Paul J. Freehauf ' filling out forms Owner on the computer, use only the tab #42 Falling Leaf Lane key to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not Osterville 02655 use the return City Zip key. Mailing address of owner, if different: same Street Address/PO Box: tenon City State Zip (508)428 -6682 ext. Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Holmes and Mcgrath, Inc. O&M Firm 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 Street Address Falmouth MA 02540 City State Zip (508) 548 -3564 ext. Telephone Number Luis Coelho 14887 Grade 4M Operator Name Technology Company/Date of Training C. Facility/System Information Gen. Use Cert. #97894 Innovative Ruck Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less.than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes ® No D. Operating Information 11/4/21 12/11/20 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank=8" Graywater Tank=6" Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 1 of 3 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 55 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 1/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Ellen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) E. Field Testing — not required for standard inspection of EIjen, Enviro-Septic or RUCK Field Inspection: Color: ❑ gray ❑ brown ® clear ❑ turbid ❑ Other(specify): Odor: ® musty ❑ earthy ❑ moldy ❑ offensive ❑ turbid Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some pH 6 to 9 U DO 2 or gre te mg/L Turbidity qo or�esNTU Should a Remedial or General Use system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD and TSS. F. Sampling Information — not required for standard inspection of EIjen or Eviro-Septic Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Commercial systems or systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: gpd Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ CBOD ❑ TSS ❑ TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection &during this inspection: The septic tank was pumped out December 10, 2018 Notes and Comments: All components inspected and working properly. The structural integrity of both tanks were good and did not notice any evidence of leakage in or out of the tank. Vents in place and working. The scum layer was 1 inch thick at oulet end of tank. The septic tank again this year showed no signs of failure. t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 2 of 3 Ll Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) H. Certification certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have conducted any required Field Testing and/or sample collection in accordance with Standard Methods, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I have attended a trai ' g course for this System with the Technology Company and am listed by the Company as rained ins tor. January 6, 2022 O r Signature Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results _ to the local board of.health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use—by January 31St of each year for the previous calendar year Piloting Use-within 45 days of inspection date Provisional Use—by March 31 th of each year for the previous 12 months General Use—by September 30th of each year for the previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 t5iaomr.doc- 6-16-06 Page 3 of 3 r Holmes and Mcgraih, inc LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL civil engineers and land surveyors 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 DATE 11/13/19 JOB No. 217102 falmouth, ma. 02540 ATTENTION 508-548-3564 • 800-874-7373 • FAX 508-548-9672 email:Icoelho@holmesandmcgrath.com RE: Mr. Paul J. Freehauf #42 Falling Leaf Lane To: DEP Osterville, MA 02655 Attn: Title 5 Program 1 Winter Street, 6"'Floor Boston, MA 02108 WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 11/6/2019 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M form. REMARKS: COPY TO.- Barnstable.Board of Health Paul J. Freehauf SIGNED: Luis Coelho _ v W t Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) A. Installation Important:When Mr. Paul J. Freehauf filling out forms Owner on the computer, use only the tab #42 Falling Leaf Lane key to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not Osterville 02655 use the return City Zip key. t� Mailing address of owner, if different: same _ Street Address/PO Box: City State Zip (508)428 -6682 ext. Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Holmes and Mcgrath, Inc. 0&M Firm 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 Street Address Falmouth MA _ 02540 City State Zip (508) 548-3564 ext. Telephone Number Luis Coelho 14887 Grade 4M Operator Name Technology Company/Date of Training C. Facility/System Information Gen. Use Cert. #97894 Innovative Ruck Systems _Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes ® No D. Operating Information 11/6/19 11/29/18 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank=3" Graywater Tank=7" Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 1 of 3 r MWI Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) E. Field Testing — not required for standard inspection of EIjen, Enviro-Septic or RUCK Field Inspection: Color: ❑ gray ❑ brown ® clear ❑ turbid ❑ Other(specify): Odor: ® musty ❑ earthy ❑ moldy ❑ offensive ❑ turbid Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some pH 6 tO g U DO 2 or gre te mg/L Turbidity a0 or IesNTU Should a Remedial or General Use system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD and TSS. F. Sampling Information — not required for standard inspection of EIjen or Eviro-Septic Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Commercial systems or systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: gpd Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ CBOD ❑ TSS ❑ TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection &during this inspection: The septic tank was pumped out December 10, 2018 Notes and Comments: All components inspected and working properly. The structural integrity of both tanks were good and did not notice any evidence of leakage in or out of the tank. Vents in place and working. The scum layer was 0 inch thick at oulet end of tank. The septic tank this year showed no signs of failure. The c� client is using a product to help rejuvenate ruck filter. t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 2 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 1� Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) H. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have conducted any required Field Testing and/or sample collection in accordance with Standard Methods, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I have attended a training course for this System with the Technology Company and am listed by the Company as ained inspe r. November 13, 2019 Oq or Signature Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use— by January 31 st of each year for the previous calendar year Piloting Use-within 45 days of inspection date Provisional Use—by March 311h of each year for the previous 12 months General Use—by September 301h of each year for the previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 61h Floor Boston, MA 02108 t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 3 of 3 Holmes and Mcgrath, inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL civil engineers and land surveyors 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 DATE 12/17/18 JOBNO. 217102 falmouth, ma. 02540 ATTENTION 508-548-3564 • 800-874-7373 • FAX 508-548-9672 email:Icoelho@holmesandmcgrath.com RE: Mr. Paul J. Freehauf #42 Falling Leaf Lane To: DEP Osterville, MA 02655 Attn:Title 5 Program 1 Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 WE ARE SENDING YOU ®Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 11/29/2018 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M form. REMARKS: COPY TO: Barnstable Board of Health Paul J. Freehauf SIGNED: Luis Coelho Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) A. Installation Important:When Mr. Paul J. Freehauf filling out forms Owner on the computer, use only the tab #42 Falling Leaf Lane key to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not Osterville 02655 use the return City Zip key. Mailing address of owner, if different: rab same IL �I Street Address/PO Box: remm City State Zip (508)428-6682 ext. Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Holmes and Mcgrath, Inc. O&M Firm 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 Street Address Falmouth MA 02540 City State Zip (508) 548 -3564 ext. Telephone Number Luis Coelho 14887 Grade 4M Operator Name Technology Company/Date of Training C. Facility/System Information Gen. Use Cert. #97894 Innovative Ruck Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes ® No i D. Operating Information 11/29/18 11/9/17 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank=10" Graywater Tank=7" Pumping Recommended ® Yes ❑ No Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) t5iaomr.doc- 6-16-06 Page 1 of 3 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) E. Field Testing — not required for standard inspection of EIjen, Enviro-Septic or RUCK Field Inspection: Color: ❑ gray ❑ brown ® clear ❑ turbid ❑ Other(specify): Odor: ® musty ❑ earthy ❑ moldy ❑ offensive ❑ turbid Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some pH 6 to 9 SU DO 2 or greater Turbidity NTU 40 or less Should a Remedial or General Use system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD and TSS. F. Sampling Information — not required for standard inspection of EIjen or Eviro-Septic Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Commercial systems or systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: gpd Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ CBOD ❑ TSS ❑ TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection & during this inspection: The septic tank was pumped out December 10, 2018 after my inpection. Notes and Comments: All components inspected and working properly. The structural integrity of both tanks were good and did not notice any evidence of leakage in or out of the tank. Vents in place and working. The scum layer was 1 inch thick at oulet end of tank. The septic tank did show signs of the ruck system starting to fail. I noticed the septic tank to be full over the oulet tee. t5iaomr:doc- 6-16-06 Page 2 of 3 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Ellen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) H. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have conducted any required Field Testing and/or sample collection in accordance with Standard Methods, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I have attended a tr 'ning course for this System with the Technology Company and am listed by the Compan a trained pector. December 17, 2018 O rator signat Date System owner must submit this report, technology 0&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use— by January 31st of each year for the previous calendar year Piloting Use-within 45 days of inspection date Provisional Use—by March 31th of each year for the previous 12 months General Use—by September 30th of each year for the previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 t5iaomr.doc- 6-16-06 Page 3 of 3 Innovative Ruck Systems, inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL civil engineers and land surveyors 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 DATE 11/27/17 JoeNo. 217102 falmouth, ma. 02540 ATTENTION 508-548-3564 - 800-874-7373 - FAX 508-548-9672 RE: Mr. Paul J. Freehauf email:Icoelho@holmesandmcgrath.com � #42 Falling Leaf Lane - I To: DEP Osterville, MA 02655 Attn:Title 5 Program ly 1 Winter Street,61h Floor J—% Boston, MA 02108 WE ARE SENDING YOU ®Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 11/9/2017 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M form. REMARKS: COPY TO: Barnstable Board of Health Paul J. Freehauf SIGNED: Luis Coelho Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) A. Installation Important:When Mr. Paul J. Freehauf filling out forms Owner on the computer, use only the tab #42 Falling Leaf Lane key to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not Osterville 02655 use the return City Zip key. Mailing address of owner, if different: same Street Address/PO Box: 22rn City State Zip (508) 428 -6682 ext. Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Innovative Ruck Systems, Inc. O&M Firm 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 Street Address Falmouth MA 02540 City State Zip (508) 548-3564 ext. Telephone Number Luis Coelho 14887 Grade 4M Operator Name Technology Company/Date of Training C. Facility/System Information Gen. Use Cert. #97894 Innovative Ruck Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes ® No D. Operating Information 11/9/17 11/2/16 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank=8" Graywater Tank=7" Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 1 of 3 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) E. Field Testing — not required for standard inspection of Eljen, Enviro-Septic or RUCK Field Inspection: Color: ❑ gray ❑ brown ® clear ❑ turbid ❑ Other(specify): Odor: ® musty ❑ earthy ❑ moldy ❑ offensive ❑ turbid Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some pH 6.8 SU DO 1.09 mg/L Turbidity NTU 6 to 9 2 or greater 40 or less Should a Remedial or General Use system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD and TSS. F. Sampling Information — not required for standard inspection of Eljen or Eviro-Septic Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Commercial systems or systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: gpd Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ CBOD ❑ TSS ❑TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection &during this inspection: None Notes and Comments: All components inspected and working properly. The structural integrity of both tanks were good and did not notice any evidence of leakage in or out of the tank. Vents in place and working. The scum layer was 1 inch thick at oulet end of tank. t5iaomr.doc- 6-16-06 Page 2 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection \ Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Ellen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) H. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have conducted any required Field Testing and/or sample collection in accordance with Standard Methods, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I have attended a trainiN course for this System with the Technology Company and am listed by the Company as ained_.ias ctor. November 27, 2017 Op or ignature Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use— by January 31 st of each year for the previous calendar year Piloting Use-within 45 days of inspection date Provisional Use—by March 31th of each year for the previous 12 months General Use—by September 30th of each year for the previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 I t5iaomr.doc- 6-16-06 Page 3 of 3 t Innovative Ruck Systems, inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL civil engineers and land surveyors 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 DATE 11/21/16 JOBNO. 214042 falmouth, ma. 02540 508-548-3564 - 800-874-7373 - FAX 508-548-9672 ATTENTION email:Icoelho@holmesandmcgrath.com RE: Mr. Paul J. Freehauf #42 Falling Leaf Lane To: DEP Osterville, MA 02655 Attn:Title 5 Program 1 Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 WE ARE SENDING YOU ®Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 11/2/2016 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M form. REMARKS: COPY TO: Barnstable Board of Health Paul J. Freehauf SIGNED: Luis Coelho Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection \ Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) A. Installation - - - Important:When Mr. Paul J. Freehauf filling out forms Owner on the computer, use only the tab #42 Falling Leaf Lane key to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not Osterville use the return 02655 key. City Zip Mailing address of owner, if different: same Street Address/PO Box: 2nan City State Zip (508)428 -6682 ext. Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Innovative Ruck Systems, Inc. O&M Firm 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 Street Address Falmouth MA 02540 State Zip (508)548-3564 ext. Telephone Number Luis Coelho 14887 Grade 4M Operator Name Technology Company/Date of Training C. Facility/System Information Gen. Use Cert. #97894 Innovative Ruck Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes ® No D. Operating Information 11/2/16 12/16/15 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank=6" Graywater Tank=5" Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No t5iaomr.doc- 6-16-06 Page 1 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Ellen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) E. Field Testing — not required for standard inspection of Eljen, Enviro-Septic or RUCK Field Inspection: Color: ❑ gray ❑ brown ® clear Ll ❑ turbid ❑ Other(specify): Odor: ® musty ❑ earthy ❑ moldy ❑ offensive El turbid Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some H 6.5SU 1.12m /L p 6 to 9 DO 2 or greater— Turbidity NTU 40 or lessShould a Remedial or General Use system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD and TSS. F. Sampling Information — not required for standard inspection of Eljen or Eviro-Septic Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Commercial systems or systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: gpd Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ CBOD ❑ TSS ❑TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection &during this inspection: None Notes and Comments: All components inspected and working properly. The structural integrity of both tanks were good and did not notice any evidence of leakage in or out of the tank. Vents in place and working.The scum layer was 1 inch thick at oulet end of tank. t5iaomr.doc- 6-16-06 Page 2 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 Ll5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-septic, RUCK) H. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have conducted any required Field Testing and/or sample collection in accordance with Standard Methods, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I have attended a tr ' ing course for this System with the Technology Company and am listed by the Company a trained insp or. November 21, 2016 O or Signature Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use—by January 315t of each year for the previous calendar year Piloting Use-within 45 days of inspection date Provisional Use—by March 31th of each year for the previous 12 months General Use—by September 30th of each year for the previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 3 of 3 I t VV ' Innovative Ruck Systems, inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL civil engineers and land surveyors 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 DATE 1/7/16 JOBNO. 214042 falmouth, ma. 02540 ATTENTION 508-548-3564 - 800-874-7373 - FAX 508-548-9672 email:Icoelho@holmesandmcgrath.com RE: Mr. Paul J. Freehauf #42 Falling Leaf Lane To: DEP Osterville, MA 02655 Attn:Title 5 Program 1 Winter Street,6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 WE ARESENDINGYOU ®Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 12/16/2015 DEP Approved Inspection and 0&M form. REMARKS: COPY TO: Barnstable Board of Health Paul J. Freehauf SIGNED: Luis Coelho f Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) A. Installation Important:When Mr. Paul J. Freehauf filling out forms Owner on the computer, i use only the tab #42 Falling Leaf Lane key to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not Osterville 02655 use the return key. city Zip Mailing address of owner, if different: same Street Address/PO Box: City State Zip (508)428-6682 ext. Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Innovative Ruck Systems Inc. O&M Firm 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 Street Address Falmouth MA 02540 City State Zip (508) 548-3564 ext. Telephone Number Luis Coelho 14887 Grade 4M Operator Name Technology Company/Date of Training C. Facility/System Information Gen. Use Cert.#97894 Innovative Ruck Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes ® No D. Operating Information 12/16/15 12/4/14 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank=10" Graywater Tank=5" Sludge-Depth(to be checked yearly) Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No I t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 1 of 3 I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) E. Field Testing — not required for standard inspection of Eljen, Enviro-Septic or RUCK Field Inspection: Color: ❑ gray ❑ brown ® clear ❑turbid ❑ Other(specify): Odor: ® musty ❑ earthy ❑ moldy ❑ offensive ❑ turbid Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some pH 6.3 SU DO — 0.93.mg/L Turbidity NTU 6 to 9 f 2 or greater 40 or less Should a Remedial or General Use system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD and TSS. F. Sampling Information — not required for standard inspection of Eljen or Eviro-Septic Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Commercial systems or systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: gpd Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ CBOD ❑ TSS ❑TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection &during this inspection: None I Notes and Co mments: All components inspected and working properly.The structural integrity of both tanks were good and did not notice any evidence of leakage in or out of the tank. Vents in place and working. The scum layer was again at 3"thick. t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 2 of 3 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) H. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have conducted any required Field Testing and/or sample collection in accordance with Standard Methods, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I have attended a train' g course for this System with the Technology Company and am listed by the Company as rained insp or. January 7, 2016 Ope r Signature Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use—by January 31 st of each year for the previous calendar year Piloting Use-within 45 days of inspection date Provisional Use—by March 31 th of each year for the previous 12 months General Use—by September 30th of each year for the previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 3 of 3 '1 Innovative RuckSystems, inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL civil engineers and land surveyors 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 DATE 12/12/2014 JOB No. 214042 falmouth, ma. 02540 ATrErmoN 508-548-3564 • 800-874-7373 • FAX 508-548-9672 Mr.Paul J. Freehauf email:Icoelh o@hol mesandmcgrath.com #42 Falling Leaf Lane: To: DEP Osterville,MA 02655 Attn:Title 5 Program 1 Winter Street,6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 WE ARE SENDING YOU ®Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 12/4/2014 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M form. REMARKS: i COPY TO: Barnstable_Board_of,Health `Paul I Freehauf SIGNED: Luis Coelho LlBureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Sys toms (Eijen, Envro septic, RUCK) M A. Installation Important:When Mr. Paul J. Freehauf filling out forms Owner on the computer, use only tab #42 Falling Leaf Lane key to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not Osteryille 02655 use the return key. City Zip Mailing address of owner, if different: tab same Street Address/PO Box: ieoen City State Zip (508)428-6682 ext. Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Innovative Ruck Systems, Inc. 0&M Firm 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 Street Address Falmouth MA 02540 City State Zip (508) 548-3564 ext. Telephone Number Luis Coelho 14887 Grade 4M Operator Name Technology Company/Date of Training C. Facility/System Information Gen. Use Cert.#97894 Innovative Ruck Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes ® No D. Operating Information 12/4/14 11/19/13 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank=12" Graywater Tank=4" Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 1 of 3 Ll -Massachusetts-Departmen#-of Environmental Protection------,------- ------ Bureau of Resource Protection .- Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) E. field Testing — not required for standard inspection of Eljen, Enviro-Septic or RUCK Field Inspection: Color: ❑ gray ❑ brown ® clear ❑turbid ❑ Other(specify): Odor: ® musty ❑ earthy ❑ moldy ❑ offensive ❑ turbid Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some pH 6.0 SU DO 0.76 mg/L Turbidity NTU 6 to 9 2 or greater 40 or less Should a Remedial or General Use system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD and TSS. F. Sampling Information - not required for standard inspection of Eljen or Eviro-Septic Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Commercial systems or systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: gpd Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ CBOD ❑ TSS ❑ TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection &during this inspection: None Notes and Comments: All components inspected and working properly. The structural integrity of both tanks were good and, . did not notice any evidence of leakage in or out of the tank. Vents in place and working.The scum layer was about 3"thick. t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 2 of 3 - _ -Massachusetts-Department o EnVironmental,-Protection-- -- Bureau of Resource Protection Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for TWOS I/A L Treatment and DISposal Svi§tems (Eljen, Enyiro-Septic, RUCK) H. Certification certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above have conducted any required Field Testing and/or sample collection in accordance with Standard Meth"ods, have completed this report and th'e attached technology'operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I have attended a tr ining course for this System with the Technology Company and am listed by the Compan `s a trained ector. -� 12/12/2014 0 ator ignatur Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist,and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use-by January 315t of each Year for the previous calendar year Piloting Use-within 45 days of inspection date Provisional Use-by March 31th of each year for the previous 12 months General Use—by September 301h of each year for the previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 3 of 3 {� l holmes and mcg't ,.inc LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL civil engineers and land surveyors 205,VUorcester,Court, UnitA4 once 11/20/2013 �oBN0. `.'209166 falmouth, ma. 02540 anerrrioN 508 54873564 • 800-874-7373 • FAX 508-548-9672 ` email:Amcgrath@holmesandmcgrath.com ' Mr.Paul J. Freehauf "2 Falling Leaf,Lane To:DEP Osteniille, MA'02655 Attn:Title Program 1 Winter Street,6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 WE ARESENDINGYOU ®Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items; COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 11/19/1.3 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M form. REMARKS: COPY TO: t arnstable Board-Of:.Health Paul -Freehauf SIGNED: Luis Coelho Massachusetts Department of Environmental Prote tio cn Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&'M :Form for Title -5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems.(Eiden, Enviro-Septic; RUCK) A. Installation lmF grtant:Men Mr:'Pauf J.Freehauf filling',out forms Owner on the computer, use orily,the tab #42 Falling Leaf Lane key to move your Facility Street;Address cursor-do not use"the return Ostery_ille 02655 key, city Zip Mailing address_of_owner;_if different ._._�__f - same - - - -- - Street Address/PO Box reonn city State 'Zip (508)428-66,82 ext. Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Innovative Ruck Systems, Inc. O&M Firm 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 Street Address Falmouth MA 02540 City State Zip .(508).648-3564 ext. . Telephone Number Luis Coelho 14887 Grade 4M . Operator Name Technolo.- Company/Date of Training C. Facility/System Information. Gen:._Use Cert.#97894:: Innovative:Ruck Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID, Manufacturer ID.,.' Model Number 9/28/98 . 1:1/28/98 Installation Date . Start of.Operation. : Approval-Type: Z General . El Provisional ❑ Piloting E Remedial Seasonal Residence-:used less than:6 mo:/year:' 0 Yes ® No D. Operating Information : 1111'9/13 . 11/1/12 Inspection Date: Previous Inspection Date . Blackwater Tank=10" Graywater Tank=6" . sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) Pumping Recommended n Yes ® No i.t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-66 Page 1 of 3 = Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Title 5 DE�P Approved Inspection and ,o&M Form. for Title 5 VA Treatment.and Di posal Systems`(Eiden, Enviro-septic; RUCK) E Field Testing not required,for standard inspection of Eljen, Enviro Septic or RUCK Field Jnspection: : Color. : ❑ :gray ❑ Brown :clear ❑turbid: _ ❑ Other(specify): ------- = - .--Odor _M_musty . ❑�eartby--❑ moldy ❑_offensive ❑:turbid Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some 6:2 SU 0.96 mg7L NTLI PH DO Turbidity 6 to 9 2 or greater 40 or less : Should a Remedial or General Use system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per'Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD'and TSS. F. Sampling Information — not required for standard inspection of Eljen or Eviro-Septic Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Commercial systems or'systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: god Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ CBOD ❑ TSS ❑TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 _. Other2 Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of-any maintenance performed since:previous inspect*,.' during this inspection: None Notes and Comments:: Ali components inspected and working properly..The structural integrity of both tanks were.good and did not notice any evidence:of.leakage in or out of the tank.Vents in place and:working.The scum layer was about Z'thick.. . t5i.aomr.doc• 6-16-66 Page 2 of 3 : Massachusetts Department of Environmental'Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Title.5 DEP Approved 'Inspection and O&`M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Di posal Systems (Eijen. Enviro-Septic, RUCK) . . . H. Certification I certify I,-have inspected.the sewage treatment and disposal system at the'address above, have" conducted any required Field Testing antl/or sample collection m accordance with Standard Mefhods, have com `leted this re ort and the attached 5technolo' o eratio' and maintenance checklist,and . P P 9Y P...: the information reported is true,accurate, and complete as of the time of.the inspection. I have attended a tr` Wing course for this System With`the Technology Company and arp listed by the Com,.a a trained i P 11/20/13 Operator Siggature<.�_._ - -- -- - - - Date - System own_ er must submit this:report;'technology O.&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and°.DEP as foil ows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use—by January 31 st of:each year for the previous calendar year Piloting Use-within 45.days of inspection date Provisional Use by.March :31th of each year for the previous 12 months General U.se'—by September 30th of each year for the'previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One`Wint-er Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02108 t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 3 of 3 r rf holmes and.=mq —h, inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL civil engineers and land surveyors 205 Worcester Court, Unit A4 DATE 11/5/2012 JOB NO. 209166 falmouth, ma. 02540 drTENnory 608-548-3564 • 800-874-7373 9 FAX 508-548-9672 email:mcgrath@holmesandmcgrath.com Re., Mr. Paul J. Freehauf #42 Falling Leaf Lane � To: DEP Osterville, MA 02655 Attn:Title 5 Program 1 Winter Street,6 Floor Boston,MA 02108 WE ARE SENDING YOU N Attached F-1 Under separate cover via the following Items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 11/1/2012 DEP Aoprov6d Ins ection and O&M form. 1 REMARKS: -. 7 4 i COPY_TO; V .� Barnstable Board of Health` �• �v Paul J.Freehauf -.-- SIGNED: Luis Coelho :n Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title.5 DEP Approved InsTpection and O&M Form for Title 5 1/A- Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eiden, Enviro-Septic; RUCK) A. Installation Important: Mr. Paul J. Freehauf When filling out Owner forms on the computer,use #42 Falling Leaf Lane " only the tab key Facility'Street Address to move your Osterville 02655 cursor-do not use the return City Zip key. Mailing address of owner, if different: «a same Street Address/PO Box: .-. Henan City State Zip: (508)428-6682 ext. Telephone Number '13 Authorized Seryi,ce'Provider` Innovative.Ruck Systems Inc. O&M Firm 362 Gifford Street Street Address ` Falmouth MA 02540_ City State Zip (508) 548-,3564 ext. Telephone:Number Luis Coelho 14887 Grade 4M Operator'Name Technology Company/Date of Training C. facility/System Information Gen. Use Cert. #97894 Innovative Ruck Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28 98 Installation Date Start Of Operation Approval Type: 0 General '❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial, Seasonal Residence=used less than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes No D. OperatingInformation 11/1/12 10/31/11 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank=11" Graywater Tank=6" Pumping Recommended El Yes ® No Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly), t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 1 of 3 J — LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental.Protection Bureau of Resource Protection -Title 5 DEP Approved Inspectionan.d, 0&M Form for Title .5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Even, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) E. Field Testing — not required for standard inspection of EIjen, Enviro-Septic or .RUCK Field Inspection: Color: ❑ gray ❑ brown Z clear ❑ turbid ❑ Other(specify): Odor: ® musty ❑ earthy ❑ :moldy ❑ offensive ❑ turbid Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some SU mg/L NTU PH DO Turbidity 6 to 9 2 or.greater 40 or less Should a.Remedial or General Use'system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD and TSS. f. Sampling Information , rnot required forstandard mspectton of EIDen:or Eviro Septic Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Commercial systems or systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: gpd Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ CBOD ❑ TSS ❑ TN ❑ Other(list-.below) Other 1 Other Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection&during this inspection: None Notes and Comments:` All components inspected and working properly. The structural integrity of both tanks were good and did not notice any evidence of leakage in or out of the tank. Vents in place and working. The scum layer was about 2.5" thick. f t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 2 of 3 L __ Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection L7� 1 .Bureau of Resource Protection -Title 5 f DEP`Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 IIA Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, .RUC.K) H. Certification certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have conducted any required Field Testing and/or sample collection in accordance with Standard Methods, have completed this report and the,attachetl technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the informatiori reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I have attended a t; ing,cours or this•System with the Technolooy Company and am listed by the Compan a traine sector: 11/5/12 O ra . ign to•" Date ` System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use—by January 31'of each year for the previous calendar year ' Piloting Use within,45 days of inspection date `Provisional Use=by March�31th of each year for the.,previous 12=months Gen eraMS'G'-by September 30'h of each year for the previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title.5 Program One Winter Street, 6'h Floor Boston, MA 02108 t5iaomr.doc• 6-16-06 Page 3 of 3 holmes and mcgrath, inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL civil engineers and land surveyors 362 gifford street DATE 11/8/10 JOBNo. 209166 Falmouth, ma. 02540 ATTEMN 508-548-3564 - 800-874-7373 - FAX 508-548-9672 email:mcgrath@holmesandmcgrath.com RE: Mr. Paul J. Freehauf #42 Falling Leaf Lane To: DEP Osterville, MA 02655 Attn:Title 5 Program 1 Winter Street,6 Floor Boston, MA 02108 WE ARE SENDING YOU ®Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 10/21/2010 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M form. REMARKS: COPY TO::,. 0 fBarnstable,Board of Health -Paul J.-Freehauf -- SIGNED: Luis Coelho I� 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection r Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) A. Installation Important: Mr. Paul J. Freehauf When filling out Owner forms on the computer, use #42 Falling Leaf Lane only the tab key Facility Street Address to move your Osterville 02655 cursor-do not use the return City Zip key. Mailing address of owner, if different: � same Street Address/PO Box: City State Zip (508)428-6682 ext. Telephone Number = --3 B. Authorized Service Provider '-n Innovative Ruck Systems, Inc. 0&M Firm 362 Gifford Street Street Address Falmouth MA 02540 City State Zip (508) 548-3564 ext. Telephone Number Luis Coelho 14887 Grade 4M Operator Name Technology Company/Date of Training C. Facility/System Information Gen. Use Cert. #97894 Innovative Ruck Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes ® No D. Operating Information 10/21/10 10/27/09 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank=12" Graywater Tank=6" Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) t5iaomr.doc- 6-16-06 Page 1 of 3 _, W Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) E. Field Testing — not required for standard inspection of EIjen, Enviro-Septic or RUCK Field Inspection: Color: ❑ gray ❑ brown ® clear ❑ turbid ❑ Other(specify): Odor: ® musty ❑ earthy ❑ moldy ❑ offensive ❑ turbid Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some pH 6 to 9 SU DO 2 or greatermg/L Turbidity NTU ao or Ies Should a Remedial or General Use system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD and TSS. F. Sampling Information — not required for standard inspection of EIjen or Eviro-Septic Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Commercial systems or systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: gpd Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ CBOD ❑ TSS ❑TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection &during this inspection: None Notes and Comments: All components inspected and working properly. The structural integrity of both tanks were good and did not notice any evidence of leakage in or out of the tank. Vents in place and working. t5iaomr.doc- 6-16-06 Page 2 of 3 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems (Eljen, Enviro-Septic, RUCK) H. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have conducted any required Field Testing and/or sample collection in accordance with Standard Methods, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I have attended a ining course r th' System with the Technology Company and am listed by the Comps s a trained i 11/8/10 r r igna ure Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use—by January 31st of each year for the previous calendar year Piloting Use-within 45 days of inspection date Provisional Use—by March 31th of each year for the previous 12 months General Use—by September 30th of each year for the previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 6t Floor Boston, MA 02108 t5iaomr.doc- 6-16-06 Page 3 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 ILL< DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems A. Installation Important: When filling out Mr. Paul J. Freehauf forms on the Owner computer, use only the tab key 42 Falling Leaf Lane to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not use the return Osterville MA 02655 key. City State Zip Mailing address of owner, if different: (same) Street Address/PO Box: rewn City State Zip (508) 428-6682 Telephone Number o B. Authorized Service Provider . Innovative Ruck Systems r� w O&M Firm C - 362 Gifford Street Street Address Falmouth Ma. 02540 z7— 29' City State Zip M (508) 548 - 3564 ext. Telephone Number Luis Coelho Certified Operator Name Certification Number C. Facility/System Information General Use Cert.#: 97894 Innovative RUCK Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑Yes ®No D. Operating Information 6/29/07 10/16/06 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank = 12"; Graywater Tank =8" Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) Freehauf Insp. June '07.doc•8/8/07 Page 1 of 2 C . .......... . Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 1 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems normal Effluent Description E. Sampling Information Samples Taken: ® Influent ® Effluent Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑TSS ®TN ❑ Other(list below) NO2, NO3, NH3, TKN Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection &during this inspection: None. Notes and Comments: F. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the informati n reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I am a Mass usetts cert:Aed o rator in accordance with 257 CMR 2.00. 7/2/07 per for Signature Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use—by January Piloting & Provisional Use- General Use—by September 31 st of each year for the within 30 days of inspection 30th of each year for the previous calendar year date previous 12 months Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 61h Floor Boston. MA 02108 Freehauf Insp. June '07.doc•8i8i07 Page 2 of 2 b Town of Barnstable Barnstable IIAR"ATABGE ;HPICBC i Board of Health 200 Main Street, Hyannis MA 02601 2007 Office: 508-862-4644 Wayne Miller,M.D. FAX: 508-790-6304 - Paul Canniff,D.M.D. Junichi Sawayanagi September 5, 2007 Mr. Paul Freehauf 42 Falling Leaf Lane Osterville, MA 02655 RE: Sampling of Wastewater Effluent:from your Innovative/Alternative (RUCK)System" at 42,Fall* Leaf Lane, Ostervill`e Dear Mr. Freehauf, You will be granted permission to reduce sampling and monitoring of the wastewater effluent from your RUCK system at 42 Falling Leaf Lane, once a fourth test is received which meets the discharge limits. A public hearing was held before the Board of Health on August 21, 2007. The Board reviewed testing results for your RUCK system. Since April 1999, four samples were taken from your . onsite UA system: Three of the four sample results, one of which was the most recent sample result, were below the effluent wastewater discharge limit for total nitrogen. The Board voted unanimously to allow you to reduce the testing to once yearly for total nitrogen, once a fourth test is received which meets the discharge limits. Please make arrangements to schedule the sampling and testing to be conducted sometime before the end of the year. Since y, yne iller, D. Chairman BO OF HEALTH Q:\WPFILES\FreehaufRUCKSampling2OO7.doe rf R Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/ALl Treatment and Disposal Systems A. Installation Important: When filling out Mr. Paul J. Freehauf forms on the Owner computer, use only the tab key 42 Falling Leaf Lane to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not Osterville MA 02655 use the return key. City State Zip Mailing address of owner, if different: r� (same) Street Address/PO Box: rsaon City State Zip (508) 428-6682 Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Innovative Ruck Systems O&M Firm 362 Gifford Street Street Address Falmouth Ma. 02540 City State Zip (508) 548 - 3564 ext. Telephone Number Luis Coelho Certified Operator Name Certification Number C. Facility/System Information General Use Cert.#: 97894 Innovative RUCK Systems Residentia{j RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Numb r 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation e�`3 e: `•�i r i Approval Type: ® General ❑Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑Remedial �. C) Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑Yes ®No =. c3 w r.. a, D. Operating Information 10/16/06 09/06/05 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank = 8"; Greywater Tank = 10" Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) Freehauf Insp. '06.doc. 10/25/06 Page 1 of 2 A Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5Ll , DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A -Treatment and Disposal Systems normal Effluent Description E. Sampling Information Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑'Effluent Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ TSS ❑ TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection & during this inspection: None. Notes and Comments: F. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I am a Massac etts cerf�drator in accordance with 257 CMR 2.00. 10/25/06 op,pratof Signatur Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use—by January Piloting & Provisional Use - General Use—by September 31s'of each year for the within 30 days of inspection 30'h of each year for the previous calendar year date previous 12 months Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston. MA 02108 Freehauf Insp. '06.doc. 10/25/06 Page 2 of 2 er LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems A. Installation Important: When filling out Mr. Paul J. Freehauf forms on the Owner computer,use only the tab key 42 Falling Leaf Lane to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not use the return Osterville MA 02655 key. City State Zip Mailing address of owner, if different: I (same) Street Address/PO Box: nun City State Zip (508)428-6682 Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Innovative Ruck Systems 0&M Firm 362 Gifford Street Street Address Falmouth Ma. 02540 City State Zip (508)548-3564 ext. Telephone Number Paul C. LaCroix 3340 Certified Operator Name Certification Number C. Facility/System Information General Use Cert.#: 97894 Innovative RUCK Systems Residential RUCK DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑Yes ®No D. Operating Information 6/22/04 5/2/03 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank = 6"; Greywater Tank = 12" Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No Freehauf Insp. '04.7/30/04 Page 1 of 1 1 , LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems normal Effluent Description E. Sampling Information Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ TSS ❑ TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection & during this inspection: None. Notes and Comments: F. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I am a Mas h set s7cetifie o erator in accordance with 257 CMR 2.00. _2gl 29/0 Operator Signature Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use—by January Piloting & Provisional Use- General Use—by September 31 st of each year for the )within 30 days of inspection 30th of each year for the previous calendar year date previous 12 months Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston. MA 02108 Freehauf Insp. '04.7/30/04 Page 2 of 2 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection i Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems A. Installation Important: When filling out Mr. Paul J. Freehauf forms on the Owner computer,use only the tab key 42 Falling Leaf Lane to move your Facility Street Address cursor-do not use the return Osterville MA 02655 key. City State Zip Mailing address of owner, if different: (same) Street Address/PO Box: ieuun City State Zip (508)428-6682 Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider Innovative Ruck Systems 0&M Firm 362 Gifford Street Street Address Falmouth Ma. 02540 City State Zip (508)548-3564 ext. Telephone Number Paul C. LaCroix 3340 Certified Operator Name Certification Number C. Facility/System Information DEP ID Manufacturer ID Model Number 9/28/98 11/28/98 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting ❑ Remedial Seasonal Residence—used less than 6 mo./year: ❑Yes ®No D. Operating Information 6/22/04 01/21/03 Inspection Date Previous Inspection Date Blackwater Tank =6'; Greywater Tank= 12" Sludge Depth(to be checked yearly) Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No Freehauf Insp. '04.5/9/04 Page 1 of 2 rh LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems normal Effluent Description E. Sampling Information Samples Taken: ❑ Influent❑ Effluent Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ❑ BOD ❑ TSS ❑ TN ❑ Other(list below) Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection &during this inspection: None. Notes and Comments: F. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reported is true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I am a Masus tts certified operator in accordance with 257 CIVIR� 0. 7 Operator Signature Date System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health and DEP as follows for each inspection performed:, Remedial Use—by January Piloting & Provisional Use- General Use—by September 31 st of each year for the within 30 days of inspection 30th of each year for the previous calendar year date previous 12 months Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 6th Floor Boston. MA 02108 i Freehauf Insp. 04.5/9/04 Page 2 of 2 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 JANE SWIFT BOB DURAND Governor Secretary LAUREN A LISS Commissioner December 31,2002 Paul Freehauf 42 Falling Leaf Lane Barnstable,MA 02630 Re: 42 Falling Leaf lane,Barnstable,MA DEP Facility ID:RUCK09 Operation&Maintenance Requirements. Dear Mr.Freehauf As you are the owner of an alternative on-site sewage treatment and disposal system regulated under Title 5 of the State Environmental Code, 310 CMR 15.000,I am writing to remind you of your operation and maintenance obligations. According to the Department of Environmental Protection's records,a RUCK system has been installed at the.above referenced location. The Department's approval for this system requires that, throughout the system's life,the system owner must maintain an agreement with a person or firm competent in providing services consistent with the system's specifications, the operation and maintenance required by the designer and any specified by the Department. In addition, every time the operator or operators are changed, the owner must notify the Department and the local Board of Health,in writing,within seven days of such change. The Department has received information indicating that you are no longer under contract with an operation and maintenance firm in violation of your system approval. Please notify the Department, in writing, within fourteen days of receipt of this letter, of the name of the new operator for your system and submit a copy of your current contract.Failure to comply with this request may result in enforcement action by the Department Please submit the information to: Department of Environmental Protection Title 5 Program Watershed Permitting Program One Winter Street,6th floor .Boston,MA 02108 If you have any questions concerning your operation and maintenance requirements, please feel free to contact John L.Ciccotelli at the DEPBoston Office at(611)292-5657. IS* ely, r Sharon .Pelosi,Director Watershed Permitting Program cc: Barnstable Board of Health DEP/SERO,B.Dudley This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)574-6872. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.state.ma.us/dep Z� Printed on Recycled Paper • J innovative ruck systems, inc. 200 main street Falmouth, ma 02540 1-800-874-7373 TO: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE N'OU21 200;0 ATTENTION: MARCIA SHERMAN REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108 DEAR MS. SHERMAN PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENC LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATE L®C/ TED IN NIl ROG"EN SENSITIVE AREYES CLIENT McShane C®nstruction DATE 11/21/00 LOCATION o`ts2Fating afLan�e x M � Y TOWN Barnstal?le, OUTPUT D-BOX pH ,N:r6 0 ;gig BOD 39 mgll TSS $°19 , j mg/I AMMONIA 42 _ mg/I TKN 12 mg/I NO3 44 mg/I TN164 mg/I DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN 'AYES LEGEND BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED TIMOTHY M. SANTOS innovative ruck systems, inc. CC: McSHANE CONSTRUCTION CO. BARNSTABLE BOARD OF HEALTH R. LAAK � | GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL Inorganic Chemistry Field ID: 1ro-t--2-.Dfq9x Matrix: Aqueous Project: McShane/99170 Sampled: 10-31-00 Client: Holmes&McGrath Received: 10-31-00 Lab I D: 37080-07 Container: I L Plastic Preservation: Cool ir Lab I D: 37080-01 Container: 250 mL Plastic Preservation: Cool Lab I D: 37080-04 Container: 250 ml.Plastic Preservation: H2SO4 Cool Method References: Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes,US EPA,EPA-600/4-790-020,Revised(1983),and Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, US EPA, EPA/600/R-93/100,(1993),and Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, APHA,Eighteenth Edition(1992). Report Notations: BRL Indicates result, if any, is below reporting limit for analyte. Reporting limit is the lowest value that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory operating conditions. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample dilution and sample size. � Groundwater Analytical, |nc, PC). Box l2O0 228 Main Street, Buzzards Bay, MLA02S32 | / November 21, 2000 Ms . Marcia Sherman DEP-Water Pollution Control One Winter Street Boston MA 02108 Dear Ms . Sherman: Re Lot 2, Falling Leaf Lane Our Job No. 98315 ---------------------------- At Lot 2 Falling Leaf Lane, there has been four successful tests of the passive residential RUCK® system in a D Zone 2 . According to my understanding, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) can now reduce the testing requirements on this lot to a yearly test . Please write a letter reducing the testing requirements . If you have any questions, please call or write me. Sincerely, INNOVATIVE RUCK SYSTEMS —7�4j qz�"� Timothy M. Santos Engineer cc: McShane Construction Co. Barnstable Board of Health J o II innovative ruck systems, inc. 200 main street falmouth, ma 02540 1-800-874-7373 TO: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE February 10,2000 ATTENTION: STEVE CORR P.E. REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108 DEAR MR. CORR PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENC LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING _ TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATE LOCATED NITRO:GENSENSITIVE AREYES IN .. CLIENT McShane Constructfion DATE 01/26/00 LOCATION Lot.2j'Falling Leaf Lane; TOWN pBarnstatle, Ma INPUT OUTPUT APPROX. REMOVAL BLACKWATER GREYWATER D-BOX RESULTS pH 7.6 BOD 280 mg/I 42_ mg/I 61 mg/I 62% TSS 370 mg/I 17: mg/I 44 mg/I , , 77% FECAL COLIF 250000 ! 100 ml 121000 / 100 ml 3000 / 100 ml 98% AMMONIA 96 mg/I 19 mg/I 77 mg/I TKN 120 mg/I 23 mg/I 24 mg/I NO3 BRL mg/I 8. mg/I 0.4 mg/I TN 120 mg/I 31 mg/I 24.4 mg/I 68% DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN NO LEGEND NT SAMPLE GATHERED TOO SMALL SAMPLE NOT GATHERED NM NOT MEANINGFUL BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS NR NOT REQUIRED REMOVAL RATE IS AN APPROXIMATE VALUE SINCE THE WASTEWATER FLOWS ARE SPLIT BLACKWATER IS ASSUMED TO BE 50% OF THE FLOW. TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED MICHAEL B. MCGRATH, P.E. innovative ruck systems, inc. CC: CLIENT BOARD OF HEALTH R. LAAK BARNSTABLE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 1 innovative ruck systems, inc. 200 main street falmouth. ma 02540 1-800-874-7373 TO: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE May 13, 1999 ATTENTION: STEVE CORR P.E. REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108 DEAR MR CORR: PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENC LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATE LOCATED IN NITROGEN SENSITIVE AREYES CLIENT McShane Construction DATE 04/28/99 LOCATION L--ot g Leaf"Lane -- TOWN Barnstable, Ma INPUT OUTPUT APPROX. REMOVAL BLACKWATER GREYWATER D-BOX RESULTS pH 7.3 6.7 6.4 BOD 240 mg/I 76 mg/I 68 mg/I 57% TSS 29 mg/I 27 mg/I 45 mg/l NM FECAL COLIFORM / 100 ml / 100 ml / 100 ml NR AMMONIA 76 mg/I 9.7 mg/I 10 mg/I TKN 99 mg/I 13 mg/I 16 mg/I NO3 BRL mg/I BRL mg/I 0.03 mg/I TN 99 mg/I 13 mg/I 16.03 mg/I 71% DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN YES LEGEND NT SAMPLE GATHERED TOO SMALL SAMPLE NOT GATHERED NM NOT MEANINGFUL BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS NR NOT REQUIRED REMOVAL RATE IS AN APPROXIMATE VALUE SINCE THE WASTEWATER FLOWS ARE SPLIT BLACKWATER IS ASSUMED TO BE 50% OF THE FLOW. TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED MICHAEL B. MCGRATH, P.E. innovative ;uCk :3vstenis, inc. CC: CLIENT BOARD OF HEALTH DEP LAKEVILLE ATTN JEFF GOULD R. LAAK BARNSTABLE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT i innovative Fuck systems, inc. 200 main street falmouth, ma 02540 1-800-874-7373 TO: Nk DEPARTMENT,,OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE May 13, 1999 ATTENTION: STEVE CORR P.E. REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108, DEAR MR. CORR: PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENCE LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATE LOCATED IN NITROGEN SENSITIVE AREYES CLIENT McShane Construction DATE 04/28/99 LOCATION Lot 1 Falling Leaf Lane TOWN Barnstable, Ma INPUT OUTPUT APPROX. REMOVAL BLACKWATER GREYWATER D-BOX RESULTS pH 7.5 6.9 6.9 BOD 200 mg/I 230 mg/I 210 mg/I 2% TSS 26 mg/I BRL mg/I 15 mg/I NM FECAL COLIFORM / 100 ml / 100 ml / 100 ml NR AMMONIA 37 mg/I 3.6 mg/I 3 mg/I TKN 52 mg/I 6.9 mg/I 7.8 mg/I NO3 BRL mg/I 0.02 mg/I BRL mg/I TN 52 mg/I 6.92 mg/I 7.8 mg/I 74% DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN YES LEGEND NT SAMPLE GATHERED TOO SMALL SAMPLE NOT GATHERED NM NOT MEANINGFUL BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS NR NOT REQUIRED REMOVAL RATE IS AN APPROXIMATE VALUE SINCE THE WASTEWATER FLOWS ARE SPLIT BLACKWATER IS ASSUMED TO BE 50% OF THE FLOW. TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED , MICHAEL B. MCGRATH, P.E. innovative ruck systems, inc. CC: CLIENT BOARD OF HEALTH DEP LAKEVILLE ATTN JEFF GOULD ,R=LAAK BARNSTABLE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT r ; innovative ruck systems, inc. 200 main street falmouth, ma 02540 1-800-874-7373 TO: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE May 13, 1999 ATTENTION: STEVE CORR P.E. REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108 DEAR MR CORR: PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENC LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATE LOCATED IN NI NTRQGE SENSITIVE AREYES ua:. CLIENT McShane Construction DATE 04/28/99 LOCATION ILot'2'Faling Leaf Lane TOWN Barnstable, Ma INPUT OUTPUT APPROX. REMOVAL BLACKWATER GREYWATER D-BOX RESULTS pH 7.3 6.7 6.4 BOD 240 mg/I 76 mg/1 68 mg/I 57% TSS 29 mg/I 27 mg/I 45 mg/I NM FECAL COLIFORM / 100 ml / 100 ml / 100 ml NR AMMONIA 76 mg/I 9.7 mg/I 10 mg/I TKN 99 mg/I 13 mg/1 16 mg/I NO3 BRL mg/I BRL mg/I 0.03 mg/I TN 99 mg/I 13 mg/I, 16.03 mg/I 71% DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN YES LEGEND NT SAMPLE GATHERED TOO SMALL SAMPLE NOT GATHERED NM NOT MEANINGFUL BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS NR NOT REQUIRED REMOVAL RATE IS AN APPROXIMATE VALUE SINCE THE WASTEWATER FLOWS ARE SPLIT BLACKWATER IS ASSUMED TO BE 50% OF THE FLOW. TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED MICHAEL B. MCGRATH, P.E. innovative rack systems, inc. CC: CLIENT BOARD OF HEALTH DEP LAKEVILLE ATTN JEFF GOULD R. LAAK BARNSTABLE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT I yy innovative ruck systems, inc. r 200 main street falmouth, ma 02540 1-800-874-7373 'ro: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE May 13 1999 ATTENTION: STEVE CORR P.E. REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108 DEAR MR CORR: PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENCE LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATE LOCATED;IN NITROGEN SENSITIVEARE�YES CLIENT McShane Construction DATE ........... LOCATION Lot 2 Falhrg LeafLane TOWN ... Ma INPUT OUTPUT APPROX. REMOVAL BLACKWATER GREYWATER D-BOX RESULTS pH 73 6.7 64 BOD 240 mg/I 7fi mg/I 68 mg/I 57°l0 TSS 29 mg/I 27 mg/I 45 " mg/I NM; FECAL COLIFORM /100 ml /100 ml /100 ml NR )AMMONIA 7fi mg/I 9 7 mg/I 10 mg/I TKN 99 mg/I 13 .. mg/I 1 fi mg/I NO3 BRL mg/I BRL mg/I U Q3 mg/I TN 99 13 mg/I 1 fi 03 mg/I . . . mg DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN YES LEGEND NT SAMPLE GATHERED TOO SMALL SAMPLE NOT GATHERED NM NOT MEANINGFUL BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS NR NOT REQUIRED REMOVAL RATE IS AN APPROXIMATE VALUE SINCE THE WASTEWATER FLOWS ARE SPLIT , BLACKWATER IS ASSUMED TO BE 50% OF THE FLOW. TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED MICHAEL B. MCGRATH, P.E. innovative ruck systems, inc. CC: CLIENT BOARD OF HEALTH bEP LAKEVILLE ATTN JEFF GOULD R. LAAK BARNSTABLE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT I innovative ruck systems, inc. 200 main street falmouth, ma 02540 1-800-874-7373 �0: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE Setembef 6, 1999 ATTENTION:STEVE CORR P.E. REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108 DEAR MR CORR: /601 PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENCE LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATE LOCATED<IN" NITROGEN SENSITIVE AREIYES CLIENT McShane Gonstructlon DATE 07/27/99 LOCATION Lo12 Falling Lea#Lane TOWN. Barnstable.Ma INPUT OUTPUT APPROX. REMOVAL BLACKWATER GREYWATER D-BOX RESULTS pH 71 65 63 BOD 160 mg/I 25 mg/I mg TSS 61 mg/I 32 mg/I 140 mg/I FECAL COLIF 920000 /100 ml 23600 /100 ml 60000 /100 ml 87% AMMONIA 110 mg/I 8$ mg/I 9 3 mg/I i KN 140 mg/I 14 mg/I 16 mg/I mg/I o,16 NO3 BRL mg/I 26 mg/I TN 140 mg/l 1416 mg/I 18 6 mg/I 76% DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN Y.ES LEGEND NT SAMPLE GATHERED TOO SMALL SAMPLE NOT GATHERED NM NOT MEANINGFUL BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS NR NOT REQUIRED REMOVAL RATE IS AN APPROXIMATE VALUE SINCE THE WASTEWATER FLOWS ARE SPLIT BLACKWATER IS ASSUMED TO BE 50% OF THE FLOW. TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED MICHAEL B. MCGRATH, P.E. innovative ruck systems, inc. CC: ' CLIENT BOARD OF HEALTH bEP LAKEVILLE ATTN JEFF GOULD R. LAAK BARNSTABLE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT . i innovative ruck systems, inc. 200 main street falmouth, ma 02540 1-800-874-7373 "0: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE November 10, 1999 ATTENTION: STEVE CORR P.E. REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108 123 DEAR MR. CORR PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENCE LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATE LOCATED tN NITROGEN SENSITIVE AREIYES CLIENT McShane C©nstructlan DATE 10/26199 LOCATION Lo1:2 F TOWN Barnstable',Ma INPUT OUTPUT APPROX. REMOVAL BLACKWATER GREYWATER D-BOX RESULTS pH 72 66 64 BOD 130 mg/I 47 mg/I 49 mg/I 45°/a TSS 43 mg/I 27 mg/I 32 mg/I 9% FECAL COLIF 130000 /100 ml 14200 /100 ml 16500 /100 ml 77°10 �MMONIA 91 mg/I 5 mg/I mg/I rKN 110 mg/I 9 4 mg/I 7 mg/I NO3 ERL mg/1 BRL mg/I 0X. 4 mg/I TN 110 ..mg/I 9 4 mg/I 101;, mg/1 83% DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN Y:ES..... LEGEND NT SAMPLE GATHERED TOO SMALL SAMPLE NOT GATHERED NM NOT MEANINGFUL BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS NR NOT REQUIRED REMOVAL RATE IS AN APPROXIMATE VALUE SINCE THE WASTEWATER FLOWS ARE SPLIT BLACKWATER IS ASSUMED TO BE 50% OF THE FLOW. TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED MICHAEL B. MCGRATH, P.E. innovative ruck systems, inc. CC: CLIENT BOARD OF HEALTH R. LAAK BARNSTABLE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT i innovative ruck systems, inc. 200 main street J falmouth, ma 02540 I 1-800-874-7373 TO: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE Februar== 10 2000 ; ATTENTION: STEVE CORR P.E. REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108 DEAR MR. CORR PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENC LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATE LOCATEDINj. NITR®GEN SENSITIVE A EYES f CLIENTIV1.CShaC1G COt1StCUCtIOna ` DATE s01/b26/00 LOCATION oL t 2 FaIIing leafi4Lane _. ... TOWN Barnstable, IVlaAM INPUT OUTPUT APPROX. REMOVAL BLACKWATER GREYWATER D-BOX RESULTS PH764 MOW `. s A BOD �280� f $mg/I , 42mg/I 61 'mg/I ��` 626Q TSS '370 mg/I s k 17° m /I � 44 = '` 9 f € mg/I 77/o FECAL COLIF y 250000�� / 100 ml 12,1000 / 100 ml 3000 / 100 ml 98Q% v o r 1 c� _ )AMMONIA f96r "mg/I 1'9r mg/I 4177' }� mg/I TKN 1�20 mg/I 23 A mg/I 2 mg/Ia NO3 BRL' mg/I •,: 8 mg/I 0:4 mg/I k' ' TN mg/1 31 'mg/I m 244 /I68% .. "a g DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN LEGEND NT SAMPLE GATHERED TOO SMALL SAMPLE NOT GATHERED NM NOT MEANINGFUL BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS NR NOT REQUIRED REMOVAL RATE IS AN APPROXIMATE VALUE SINCE THE WASTEWATER FLOWS ARE SPLIT BLACKWATER IS ASSUMED TO BE 50% OF THE FLOW. TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED MICHAEL B. MCGRATH, P.E. innovative ruck systems, inc. CC: CLIENT BOARD OF HEALTH )R. LAAK BARNSTABLE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT I innovative ruck systems, inc. 200 main street falmouth, ma 02540 TO: 1-800-874-7373 � DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE June2900 . �. . ATTENTION: STEVE CORR P.E. REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108 DEAR MR. CORR PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENC LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATE LOCATED IN NIl ROG" s AREYE`S ' ` CLIENT McSha eConstruction � DATE LOCATION L'o,u2 FaII'j-, af Lwane fr TOWN Barnstable, Maw .,, v OUTPUT D-BOX pH BOD 42 x, mg/I TSS -`86 :" mg/I AMMONIA "63 mg/I TKN 16 mg/I NO3 � s"11 mg/I TN 2=7 mg/I DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN NO LEGEND NIT SAMPLE GATHERED TOO SMALL SAMPLE NOT GATHERED NM NOT MEANINGFUL BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS NR NOT REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED MICHAEL B. MCGRATH, P.E. innovative ruck systems, inc. CC: CLIENT J BOARD OF HEALTH R. LAAK BARNSTABLE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT �I I innovative ruck systems, inc. 200 main street falmouth, ma 02540 TO: 1-800-874-7373 � DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATE NOV 21',,t2000 .. ..w..d Bt.r .. ATTENTION: MARCIA SHERMAN REVISED 1 WINTER STREET BOSTON MA 02108 DEAR MS. SHERMAN PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COPIES OF LAB TEST RESULTS FOR THE RUCK SYSTEM AT THE REFERENC LOCATION. BELOW YOU WILL FIND AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS AND A STATEMENT IF THE SYSTEM CONFORMS TO THE DISCHARGE LIMIT OF THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE. RESULTS OF RUCK SAMPLING TYPE GENERAL CERTIFICATEglg LOCATED I,N NfTROGEf�!SNSITI�/E�4RE�YES . : CLIENT COIIS`trubfi6rl DATE 11/21/00 LOCATION Lott Fa1Gig Le fLaie � ',: TOWNBarnstable, OUTPUT D-BOX PH 6�U BOD3g TSS `19 mg/I AMMONIA 42 °mg/I sn j TKN 12 mg/I NO3 mg/I TN DOES SYSTEM CONFORM TO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TN 1AYES LEGEND BRL BELOW REPORTING RESULTS TEST RESULTS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED TIMOTHY M. SANTOS innovative ruck systems, inc. CC: McSHANE CONSTRUCTION CO. • BARNSTABLE BOARD OF HEALTH R. LAAK 'f 10/15/98 09:51 $508 428 9399 BORTOLOTTI CONST Q 001 } TO OF BARNSTABLE LOCATION SEWAGE# / VII.LAGE �AS�S!OR`S MAP LOT INSTALLER'S NAME d:PHONE NO. ; h SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY -1 r E CHVG FACHM: (type) (size) NO:OF BEDROOMS BUILDER OR OWNER PERMIIDATE: COMPLIANCE DATE: Separation Distance Between tie: Maximum Adjusted Groundwater Table to the Bottom of Leaching Facility. Feet . Private Water Supply Well and Leaching Facility (If any wells exist on site or within 200 feet of leaching facility) Feu ! Edge of Wedand and Leaching Facility(If any wedands exist Feet within 300 feet of leaching facility) ; Furnished by P7G A rlrch+ e-ara�yc. 141 Mgt Q �s 3G � p zz f.lfes 3 $�s cS-= 37 g7� 86 =311 b No. '"` L-/ Fee THE COMMO EALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Entered in computer: Yes PUB IC HEALTH DIVISION -TOWN OF BARNSTABLE., MASSACHUSETTS "'ieation for Migaal 6potem Construction Permit Application f r a Permit to Construct(X)Repair( )Upgrade( )Abandon( ) [Complete System O Individual Components Location Address or Lot No. a Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. � 11 Q Assessor's ap/Pazcel � 3—;t Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. SJ6 K-J( Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No. 7l � � Type of Building: 'h Dwelling✓ No.of Bedrooms Lot Size i�©�C sq.ft. Garbage Grinder W(A Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) Other Fixtures Design Flow 56- gallons per day. Calculated daily flow 330 gallons. Plan Date t)—30 —96 Number of sheets / Revision Date 7— Title b ed Pidf p't" — Da9� i/lef Ah P= S/D Size of Septic Tank 1 S00 6d�• Type of S.A.S. A?0'X a2' Xc1` 7rV*-e Description of Soil 0"3 X6444s R &" — 3 f 4 13'., t-�1,�� S Aid W a geiy Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) /t/ exi 60-vZ3 c6yc �yj tV.y7t7J� DESIGNING ENGINEER MUST SUP€RUiSE INSTALLATION AND CERTIFY IN WRITING Date last inspected: THE SYSTEM WAS INSTALLED IN STRICT Agreement: ACCORDANCE TO PLAN. The undersigned agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the Environmental Code and not to place the system in operation until a Certifi- cate of Compliance has been issu y is oazd ealth. m Signed Application Approved by Date./-- Application Disapproved for the following reasons /rN' -Gi`�k &x'."""�!"r�`�G•a.7, ]('-J{�/ c �, Fee�N�' W No. THE COMMO EALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Entered in computer: Yes PUBLIC HEALTH,DIVISION -TOWN bF BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS Zpplftati6 for'Migpo9;a1,w*p.5tem Construction Permit Application for a Permit to Construct'(• Repair( )Upgrade( )Abandon( ) YComplete System ❑Individual Components Location Address or Lot No.kf a. Owner's Name,Address and Tel.No. F4 /a._'F 9S*40'1 Assessor's ap/Parcelet` a. (ly .il14e, Installer's Name,Address,and Tel.No. Sv� i Designer's Name,Address and Tel.No. 7)—�3q� JUG i .�s ci brr m i Type of Building: Dwelling ✓ No.of Bedrooms Lot Size //a 00 sq.ft. Garbage Grinder WO , �. Other Type of Building No.of Persons Showers( ) Cafeteria( ) �. i Other Fixtures 1" Design Flow $5 gallons per day. Calculated daily flow '330 gallons. Plan Date /6-so -9,G Number of sheets / Revision Date7— Title eAr&d P/ad' Pldtit — OSYt4,01/le Ah /14c t/0 Size of Septic Tank 1500 Gdj Type of S.A.S. lo6�'X a2' Xc1' .�ee_4 Description of Soil 0"3 46d vt, IL �u b SO i - 3140 3' ej/Gc r1,1 S" Al d GUd- \ ' S Nature of Repairs or Alterations(Answer when applicable) /V QiL✓' �-�MS 1�� d(i�C(� 3 �� v &v tt fv.a Q Date last:inspected: Agreement: -: The'under'signed agrees to ensure the construction and maintenance of the afore described on-site sewage disposal system in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 of the Environmental Code and not to-place the system in operation until a CeAifi- cate''of Compliance has been issu Zy"is oard ealth. ---"` / / a. µ M l, ;�11 Signed Date /O/� .; Application Approved by Date "` Application Disapproved for the following reasons w �` r "1 N. = Permit No. " Date Issued - - ''------r----,6t ------------1-.-----i ----� ..v THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ,• _ BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS (Certificate of (tompliance THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the On-site Sewage Disposal System Constructed(V)Repaired ( )Upgraded( ) Abandoned( )by at a ;Ile has been constructed in accordance with the provisions of Title 5 and the for Disposal System Construction Permit No. gfof 14 dated 17 Installer Designer The issuance of this permit shall not be construed as a guarantee that the system will function as designed. Date Inspector ---�p-------------------y —/---------------- No. Jil/ G Fee THE COMMONW;V ALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION - BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS -Mi.5po5ar *p5tem Construction Permit Permission is hereby granted to Construct()()Repair( )Upgrade( )Abandon( ) System located at e9f �-d �j�h" e , 9��t.Ut � s / 4-J//fie and as described in the above Application for Disposal System Construction Permit. The applicant recognizes his/her duty to comply with Title 5 and the following local provisions or special conditions. rs. Provided Construction mus be completed within three years of the date of this-permit. Date: /Z 5r Approved by . 1 1 � j • r � -r �-StCr+•-i DATA - /OG•C� - _ ` '51 W4,Ls FAM IL*.( � G lu C> A&r3A4-s G¢a v mr- 17AaL'f FLOW = 3 x 110 scene- TANL - 33 9200/sC46 xx� SF � uS� IC.00 GAL- 1 / 4r-ru cA- c' -J AzEA 2t'ro'b• •' Or /5 'J 3 36 GPD 10.E APNu164- to►-N A¢FA SItt---\4ALL. AM4- 2 J�oTToM AZE-- = G C; )- ,d Ta AL. AYrA PEpGol...4TlON �7� 5 � � 1 a J a � ., ILLIAM A90 kW �. N Y E No. 19334 tT 9t Nvt.� •45� F& 'A 641 3►J �� `�1 �, Tr~- SD INvri 44.6 H 43, 43 �L e: Al ALL- fipc I fy ry�u 40'0- 1 Z N . 2 sTwc CECTI FIGD PLOT FLAIQ azoss-LION or- Te><,.1:� .-... L., �� LOe-&TIotit d5 l t—ZK\/I LL.0 M P &54 ax: ll-W-4�G Sc,aLl= `�> q- �� •q` I GszTt r—`f T 1-4A-r Ti4 E p¢vP (�O �5F4owN PLA.0 1ZE Eh1Gr-- HEEZoW C4M PU-15 W I T A TIRE SI DEI_1 NI= A►ll> `...{Jj-- tr K. 38b P` z 2 SZTBAZV— ZEOvIZEMENT OF Ti-(s ToV N of �3 0e►.�i t�X�.►u� i s ►.s�rLcic.eT� w t ra t N ,aw' y PAt- 3-Z 5P6u 4 FLZCV HAZAZ.D ZOH E. 4. HyE 1 h1G �� -�• C 1-A19D SIJf�IE'lL�i • �"dlGitil�� o5T'Eevll� -MASti. OFFSeT•S MOM '50 U r->1 W-6 -.SI-IOOLD, Nor B a { ('pLJ c4NT.o STG�\/i LLe jAiGjA C A#,)o.S Ti�1 U5FD Tp G6TAbL15P PROPS=T`/ LI► 54. I;X STEPHEN \ �' _._...._.___ The dwelling shall be limited to 2 bedrooms unless the septic system is modified to 41`' ! ' `L;�;4. �' �'VVlei/. include enhanced nutrient removal as approved by the Board of Health in which case a dwelling served by a modified system may be permitted to have not more than 3 / bedrooms. 1N • REVISED:. l 2 7 0 NrE n P}� %334 C v 'r.Sdii�t .SIC VATA /OG•C� '5l W44-s FAM ILA{ 7 I3EDRCVVA iv o GAOt3A1,Q Gwr<t�t 'val l_Y 1=L.OW = 3 x 110 strnc rANL - 33 9 700 ust= IC,oO CAL. I�I CX.v S F L.�AC411.1G 5ySTMA ,4r-FurA-rIct4 , zEA 261p'D• �� /5 3 ap GPD y o.�4. /SF = 44� -5 F J Sl y,IALL AAA= 2 (2)(6, Zoo oTTOM A¢r---rA = . G C; 4A4- Tr- d ZQ"a L 5 MN�ING PF�GoLATiDiJ ATE � Rya'o4' v,; A4 �?' ;Si 7; WILLIAM w N Y E Nr'.No. 19334 a ��_ a '�; LAJ- + -P i 0 STE" .qS/ 4�� 3►6 --�T i L 4 5 P INv 44.6 e�, 43 4,��1OErMQe •I7uar� r 7 Fb 4U�•t~'t�+� i *l`-i1�STp.,c NO �G�1->= - _, 3 Z _ cErn PIGD PLOT PLAt-i Qz°`� ss=T ou or- 7ZEW-A LoGAT IOh4 . 05 1 L—�2\/1 L L-C.1 M'A' P &I Sd- tom: SGAL�� I „� � DAT>= `o : 3v qL I CS7-- r-,y T�WT T fl E PAP 060L-Si-Mo 4 PLC 1.1 fZEFaYT=We HECW W CZM PL-J 5 W ITA TIF E SI t>e-U WS Alm r t(::. 3Bb P`vz- iBAGK. 2FQu12SMEWT DF T)-{s 70WKI of C� �3 02►.�i t�XE.►�� t s 1.��,rl.r,�A-ra� w l ru►N ,a /4fAP 1 y y P�1- �-Z 51 6 4 FLZCV HAZ1 zx;. - ZONE• B/aXTEQ- NyE iNG �� -�. C � ��u� Svev�rws • �"d16 i�I s� oSrEev�L.�.ls -Mass.. e)�F'SeTs mom '501 L,Z)I .6 st bLl.> Nor SE � f'f�U GANT..o�t u:� �a1vaURtl�05 T�Z, (USED 7V E(,7A"5L tSy PRO?ESZT`-f LI►JES, LXAAAAAA OA Czi i STEPtfH-N i PLLYN The dwelling shall be limited to 2 bedrooms unless the septic system is modified to. ;' include enhanced nutrient removal as approved by the Board of Health in which case a dwelling served by a modified system may be permitted to have not more than 3 `,/`J bedrooms. to REVISED:, 2 2--` '7 � 4� 1NIL91iAr �- -7- yg G N r - r, / � UR := novative RUCKsystems, Inc. A Passive Denitrifying Septic System ��Lid.IVLO � 200 Main Street, Room 201 Falmouth,MA 02540 OCT 2 1 1998 1 (800)659•RUCK(7825) In MA 1 (508)548.3564 TOWNOF S FAX (508) 548.9672 October 19, 1998 Barnstable Board of Health Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Gentlemen RE Lot 2 Falling Leaf Lane, Osterville Our office witnessed the construction. of the RUCK system at the referenced lot. The construction of the RUCK filter and appurtenances was satisfactorily constructed in accordance with the plan. If you have any questions, please call or write. Sincerely, INNOVATIVE RUC- YSTE INC. Michael B. McGrath, P.e. President cc:John McShane �� printed on recycled paper ovative RUCK Systems, Inco RE�CEIVE9 r A Passive Denitrifying Septic System 200 Main Street, Room 201 2 199� Icy Falmouth,MA 02540 to .or 1 (.800)659-RUCK (7825) In MA k` r a 1 (508)548.3564 FAX(508)548.9672 October 19, 1998 Barnstable Board of Health Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Gentlemen RE Lot 19 Falling Leaf Lane, Osterville ------------------------------------ Ir Our office witnessed the construction of the RUCK system at the referenced lot. The construction of the RUCK filter and appurtenances was satisfactorily constructed in accordance with the plan. If you have any questions, please call or write. Sincerely, INNOVATIVE UCK TEMS,/ Michael B. Mc ath, .e. President cc:John McShane �V printed on recycled paper Ion- z H 2- 11 J)lr Ruck System Maintenance Agreement Innovative RUCK Systems, Inc. is a licensed septic system inspector in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and agree to perform the following services to the septic system located at the address below. RUCK systems are served by two septic tanks, a greywater septic tank and a blackwater septic tank. System shall be inspected at least every two years A). Inspect Sentic Tanks for Required Pumping under the Following Criteria. 1. Inspect the condition of the tanks. 2. Measure the distance between bottom of scum/grease layer and bottom of the outlet baffle. 3. Measure the distance between top of scum layer and top of outlet tee. 4. Measure the thickness of the scum/grease layer. 5. Measure the sludge layer and distance from sludge to outlet tee. 6. Inspect the condition of the inlet and outlet tees. 7. Report any evidence of leakage into or out of the tank. 8. Report any evidence of any backup of effluent. * Pumping required if: 1.) Sludge is within 12" of outlet tee or baffle. 2.) Bottom of the scum layer is within 2" of the bottom of the outlet tee. 3.) Top of the scum layer is within 2" of top of the outlet tee. B.) Inspect the Vents for Evidence of Clogging and/or Blockage. Annually inspect vent tee and insure insect screen is in place and that no bird or insect nest is blocking the vent. Owner and Address of System to be Inspected: Paul& Cherlie Freehauf Lot 2 Falling Leaf Lane Barnstable, MA 02601 Telephone 7 Signature of Owner: e` - Date la S Name and Address of Inspector: Innovative RUCK Systems, Inc. 200 Main Street, Room 201 Falmouth, MA 02540 Telephone 508 -548-3564 Signature of Inspector: Date J,ol??dn License No. Issue Date Annual fee for the services described above: $50.00 'F ,f Innovative RUCK systems, Inca A massive Denim ng Septic System 200 Main Streot,Roofs 201 Fabnouthp MA 02540 1 (800)09-RUCK(7925)In MA Loos)sae-asro FAX(US) 548.9672 October J.,9,` 1996 Barnstable Board of Health Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Gentlemen RE Lot 2 Falling Leaf Lane, Osterville ------------------------------- Our office witnessed the construction of the .RUCK system at the referenced lot. The construction of the RUCK filter and appurtenances was satisfactorily constructed in accordance with the plan. If you have any questions, please call or write. . Sincerely, INNOVATIVE RUC{ `fST INC. Michael B. McGrath, P.e . President cc-. John McShane G, orintod on rooycled PaPer Z© 39bd ONI HiV69OW �R S3W-10H ZL96-8V9-809 bZ:LI 866Z/6Z/©Z 12/17/1997 16:21 5084308662 STINSON & FROD . PAGE 02 t� ..... ...a p ..pg DEED RESTRICTION AND COVENANT The under-igned, Trustee of Osterville Highland Trust, under a Declaration of Trust dated December 15, 1972 and recorded at the Barnstable Co my Registry of Deeds in Book 1792, Page 259, hereby covenants that Lots 2 , 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 , all as shown on a plan of gland entitled: "Plan of land in Barnstable (Osterville) Mass foryFrancis W. Casey, Tr. " dated February 11, 1984, revised April 23 , 1984 and made by.Baxter & Nye, Inc. and recorded in Barnstable County Registry of Deeds Plan Book 388, Page 22, shall be subject to the restrictions contained in a certain Board of Health Decision of the Town of Barnstable affecting said lots dated October 7, 1997 , a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein Executed this � -� day of , 1997 . Osterville Highland Trust . �I 7 / B / �� Y hn R. Alger, rustee COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE SS. � � � , 1997 Then personally appeared the above-named John R. Alger, Trustee, as aforesaid and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his free act and deed, before me Ndtary Public + My commission expires: 91-4 i,.Q_ �, �0611 r ` 4 Town of Barnstable 1A1t?fa7'AEL6, Board of Health 367 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Ofricc: 508-790-a265 Susan G.hask,R.S. FAX: 508-790-004 Brian R.Grady,R.S. Ralph A.Murphy,M.D. Decision of the Board of Health Regarding Lots 1 Through 14 and Lots 16 Through 25 Falling Leaf Lane, Osterville, Shown on Subdivision Plan dated February 11, 1984, revised April 23, 1984 and Identified as Parcels 3.001 Through 3.014 on Assessor's Map 144, and Parcels 3.016 Through 3.025 on Assessor's Map 144. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On November 18, 1996, the Board of Health agent, Thomas McKean, R.S., C.H.O., received twenty-four (24) disposal system permit applications along with two checks totaling $2,400.00 from Pctcr Sullivan, P.E., of Baxtcr and Nye incorporated, who was representing r O.R.E. Associates Incorporated and Osterville Highlands Trust pertaining to proposed construction along Falling Leaf Lane, Osterville. The lots are located off of Acorn Drive, Ostervilte Massachusetts, and are identified as parcels 3.001 through parcels 3.014 on Assessors Map 144, and parcels 3.016 through 3.025 on Assessor's Map 144. The disposal system construction applications indicated that parcels 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 (all the even numbered lots) were awned by Osterville Highlands Trust. The remaining applications 1 »6 b0 39Vd QOdA NOSNIIS Z99806PBOS TZ:9T L66T/LT/ZT i indicated that parcels 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, 23, and 25 (all the odd numbered lots) were owned by O.R.E. Associates. On or about November 21, 1996, Mr. McKean disapproved all twenty-four disposal constri,fiction permit applications due to the fact that the plans lacked maximum feasible compliance with the State Environmental Code, Title 5. He also returned the checks totaling $2,400.00 to Peter Sullivan, P.E., of Baxter and Nye, Incorporated, and invited him to attend a Board of Health hearing scheduled on Tuesday December 17, 1996 in order to provide Mr. Sullivan the opportunity show why he, and the owners of the parcels, believed it would be feasible to construct septic systems on these 24 lots which would meet the provisions of Title 5, the StMe Environmental Code. During the first hearing which was held on December 17, 1996, the applicant requested a continuance. Then the Board members voted to continue this matter to the February 4, 1997 public meeting. On February 4, 1997, the applicant again requested a continuance; then the Board members voted to continue this matter to the March 4, 1997 public meeting. Continuation hearinits were also held on the following dates during 1997: June 17th, July 1st, and August 1 Oth, Many documents were submitted into the record by both the applicants) and the Board of Health. The Board members rendered a decision on September 3, 1997 during a special public hearing. 2 S0 39dd GOad 8 NOSNIlS Z9980CV809 TZ:9T L661/LT/ZT FINDINGS OF THE BOARD OF HEALTH After discussion and based upon the evidence submitted, the Board of Health made the following findings: 1. All 25 lots in the subdivision fall within a DEP approved Zone II of a public water supply: the Cetiterville-Osterville-Marstons Mills Water district wells CO# 10, CO AR #3,4, and CO MC#2. The Zone 11 for these wells was approved by DEP May 3, 1994. Further, these wells are showing nitrate levels in the range of 1-3 mg/L; these levels clearly exceed background nitrate levels (generally <0.5 mg/L) and are indicative that nitrogen from human sources is reaching these wells. Septic systems are known to be the largest source of nitrogen to groundwater on Cape Cod. 2. ,'kil lots in the subdivision are within a DEP-defined nitrogen sensitive area as defined in 310 CMR 15.215(1). 3. Further, the majority of lots in the subdivision (lots 1-10 and 16-25) fall within the town of Barnstable defined WP zone, the five year time of travel contribution.zone to a public water supply. 4. Septic system effluent is a known source of nitrate and other possible contaminants to the public water supply. 5. increasing density of housing is associated with increased levels of nitrate and other contaminants in groundwater. 6 In recognition of 4 and 5 above,'DEP has determined per 310 CMR 15.214(i), that no system serving new construction in a nitrogen sensitive area designated in 310 CMR 15.215 shall I 3 90 39Vd QON-d NOSNIIS Z9980Eb809 TZ :9T L66T/LT/ZT be designed to receive or shall receive more than 440 gallons of design flow per day per acre except. as set forth at 310 CMR 15.216 (aggregate flows) or 15.217 (enhanced nitrogen removal). 7. All lots in the subdivision are less than an acre in size. Further, all lots, except lots 23 and 21, are less than one-half acre (20,000 sf). Under the nitrogen loading requirements of 310 CMR 15.214. the half-acre lots would be entitled to a 220 design flow, the lots less than one-half acre would be entitled to a 110 gpd design flow. 8. Under the Title 5 transition rules, 310 CMR 15.006, the owner of a lot on which construction of a septic system in full compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 is not feasible is entitled to construct a system with a cumulative design flow of up to 330 gpd provided that the system is constructed in compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 to the maximum extent feasible as determined by the local approving authority pursuant to 310 CMR 15.404 and 15.405. 9. 310 CMR 15.404 (maximum feasible compliance) states that a non-conforming system may ba brought into compliance through the installation of an alternative system.(i.e..a nitrogen removal system with associated design flow credit may be used to bring a system into compliance with tl�a requirements of 310 CMR 15.214). 10. The Board is in receipt of a letter from DEP to William Nye (one of the applicants)dated February 4, 1997 stating that "the department interprets compliance with the requirements of 310 CMR 15.005 (3)(a) through (c) to require, pursuant to 310 CMR 15.005(e), a considered asses!,,ment by the proponent of approved nitrogen removal technologies when site limitations prevent attainment of the 440 gallon per acre design flow standard set for new construction under 310 CMR 15.215(1)..." L0 39dd QOd3 8 NOSNIlS Z99806G80S ZZ:9Z L661/Li/Zt 11. The applicant is entitled to pursue an aggregate determination of nitrogen loading per 310 CMR 15.216 and DEP guidelines. It is this board's belief that the cumulative acreage in the subdivision, minus the acreage devoted to roads, when considered in the aggregate is sufficient to allo\� the construction of 2-bedroom homes.(220 gpd design flow) on twenty of the lots and this will be in general compliance with the nitrogen loading requirements of 310 CMR 15.214, 12. The applicant has acknowledged that lot 15 will be used for drainage and is not to be considered buildable. i 13. At the hearings held on August 19, 1997 and September 3, 1997, the applicants proposed to the Board that dwellings located on 20 of the lots, which specific lots they identified, would be limited to 2 bedrooms unless the system(s) are modified to include enhanced nutrient removal as approved by the Board of Health in which case a dwelling served by a modified system may be permitted-to have not more than -3 bedrooms. The remaining four lots would be limited to not more than 3-bedrooms and said system(s) must be modified.to>include,.enhanced,nutrient removal as approved by the Board of Health. 14. Based upon the evidence presented, the Board finds that the applicants can achieve maximum feasible compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 through either 1) the construction of 2- bedroom homes on twenty of the lots with the remaining four lots provided with nitrogen removal technology; the twenty lots must have appropriate restrictions placed upon their deeds to indicate that only 2 bedrooms are allowed, or 2) the installation of nitrogen removal technology on any lot will entitle the owner to a design flow of 330 gpd. j S 80 39dd QONJ '8 NOSNIlS Z99806G805 IZ:9Z L66T/Li/ZI r e applicant may choose in the future to present to this board an aggregate nitrogen loading which complies with 310 CMR 15.216; this plan, if approved by the board, will negate the restrictions in 14 above. ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD OF HEALTH Based upon the Board's unanimous approval of the proposed findings, the Board of Health voted to take the.following action regarding the pending twenty-four applications for disposal system construction permits submitted by the applicants, Osterville Highland Trust, John Alger,Trustee and ORE Associates, Inc.: A) Disposal System Construction Permits shall issue to ORE Associates, Inc, for lots 3, 5:; .7,�9, 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, 25 and to Osterville Highland Trust, John'Alger, Trustee for lots 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, as designed, said issuance subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. , All dwellings.shall be limited to ,.bedrooms unless the system(s) is modified to ,include enhanced nutrient removal as approved by the Board of Health in which case a dwelling served by a modified system may be permitted to have not more than 3 bedrooms. 2. Each plan shall be modified by the applicants to include a notation containing the full text of the language recited in paragraph (A)(1) above. 3. Deed restrictions, approved as to form by the Town Attorney, limiting the use of (lie dwollin.Is to two bedrooms on each of the above-referenced lots shall be recorded at the Barnst:ible Registry of Deeds. A copy of the recorded deed restriction for the particular lot for 6 60 39Vd QObd ? NOSNIIS Z99806PBOS LZ :91 L66t/LI/ZI which a Disposal System Construction Permit is sought shall be provided to the Barnstable Board of Health prior to the issuance of a Disposal System Construction Permit: _ (B) Disposal System Construction Permits shall issue to ORE Associates, Inc:. for lots I and 23 any I to Osterville Highland Trust, John Alger, Trustee for lots 12 and 22, as designed, subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. All dwellings shall be limited to not more than 3-bedrooms and said systems) must be modified to include enhanced nutrient removal as approved by the Board of Health. 2, Each plan shall be modified by the applicants to include a notation containing the full text of the language recited in paragraph (B)(1) above. (C) No permit shall issue for lot 15 which has been designated, pursuant to the initial 4 subdivision approval by the Planning Board, as a lot reserved for drainage.x , (D) The issuance of the permits, as restricted, shall not prejudice or otherwise limit the right of both;applicants, jointly or severally, to file with the Board of Health and the DEP a plan pursuant to,the`provisions of 310,GMR:'15.216(2); nor shall the mere filing of such a plan obligate the.Board of Health to approve same. VOTE: p IN FAVOR OF DECISION : RASK, GRAY, MURPHY OPPOSED: NONE Dated:: October 7, 1997 4. usan Ras hair k 7 Barnstable Board of Health Y 0T 30Vd Q083 NOSNIlS Z9980ED8os TZ :9T L661/LT/ZZ 1 ' PROPOSED RUCK SYSTEM for McSHANE CONSTRUCTION, Co. ' at LOT 2 FALLING LEAF LANE BARNSTABLE, AM 1 Onn®watave [RUCK ftstems, Norco ' A Passive Denitrifying Septic System 200 Main Street, Room 201 Falmouth,AAA 02540 ' 1 (.800)659•RUCK (7825) In MA 1 (508)548.3564 FAX (508) 548.9672 August 3, 1998 ' Mr. Thomas A. McKean, CHO, Director Barnstable Board of Health P.O. Box 534 ' Hyannis, MA 02601 ' Dear Mr. McKean Please find attached copies of the plan of the proposed RUCK System at lot 2, on Falling Leaf ' Lane in Barnstable, Ma submitted to your board for approval. Also find enclosed, in this booklet, a copy of a portion of the RUCK System plans for McShane Construction, Co at lot 2 Falling Leaf Lane in Barnstable, MA as well as a copy of the following: ' 1. Specifications 2. Monitoring Program ' 3. Maintenance Program 4. Homeowners Fact Sheet ' 5. General Certification from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) 6. Letter from the DEP on Septic Tank Sizing and Testing and Letter on Treatment Plant Operator ' Requirement. 7. A copy of a paper from URI by GOLD etal on Pathogen Removal from Buried Sand Filters ' (RUCK Filters) ' 8. ' Nitrogen Definitions Ruck Systems are passive denytrifying septic systems. Residential RUCK Systems are constructed by separating blackwater from greywater. The black' water, is.the effluent from toilets and the kitchen sink.All other wastewater is greywater. The excreted organisms, phosphorus and nitrogen rich blackwater flows from the blackwater septic tank to a specially designed, aerobic, no maintenance, subsurface RUCK ' filter. RUCK filters are constructed in a watertight container with alternating layers of sand and crushed stone. Special inserts called "INDRAINS" are installed into the sand layers. Bacteria in the unsaturated �� printed on,reeyeled paper RUCK filter oxidize the nitrogen to nitrate, creating desirable acid conditions to enhance the removal of ' phosphorus and pathogens. Blackwater is then re-combined with greywater in the greywater septic tank. The greywater, containing biodegradable organic carbon, serves as the anaerobic electron donor to ' denitrify nitrate to nitrogen gas. The denitrification process adds alkalinity, converting the liquid back to normal pH. The redefined effluent can then be discharged to a standard sized leaching field. A flow diagram of the RUCK treatment system is shown in figure 1. Components of the system are: ' separation of black and greywater flows, a blackwater septic tank, a RUCK filter, a greywater septic tank, and a standard leaching field. The design normally requires no additives or energy. The enclosures in this booklet provide specifications and describe monitoring and maintenance of the RUCK System. ' Further, the DEP has issued letters clarifying the approval and testing requirements as well as not requiring a Certified Treatment Plant Operator. ' We trust the above meets with your approval. ' If you have any questions, please call or write me. Sincerely, ' Innovative RUCK Systems, Inc. I� ' Timothy M. Santos Engineer Enclosure 1 100.00, 4 LOT 2 1 LO EXISTING ' FOUNDATION RUCK F/L TER 11'W/DE X O W LONG PLAN REFERENCE: CERTIFIED PLOT PLAN BY 1 BAXTER & NYE. INC. ' TM Z SCALE: 1" = 40' 7000 GALLON + PLAN DATE: 5/24-/98 MACMAMR 1000 GALLON LOT 2 FALLING LEAF LANE 10' SEP7/C 7ANK GREMA7£R 6' SEPTIC TANK OSTERVILLE, MA. NSA' ------------ -- APPLICANT: McSHANE CONSTRUCTION Co. RESERkF AREA �p/SIRIBUT/ BOX 10' ' LEACNINO 7RENCN. S 60'LCWC, 4'WE URFACE f£NT LOCATION a f!/N. AND 2'DEEP(SEE DETAIL) TO 6f D£7£RA//N£D IN 7H£f!£LD I 100.00' FALL//VG LEAF LANE ' PLAN VIEW OF RUCK SYSTEM LAYOUT 1 " = 30' I ' r 1 VENT BACK ' �■�■■ THROUGH HOUSE ROOF HOUSE BLACK NITRIFICATION ' WATER VENT SEPTIC - DIST. LEACHING TANK RUCK FILTER i OX FACILITY fil- ' GREY WATER O O C� SEPTIC I TANK • • • ' L - - - - - - - - - - - i- - - � i DENITRIFICATION ' TITLE 5 SYSTEM 1 . If ground water is greater than I 10' deep, no is required. pump p 2. Ruck Filter is sized for little maintenance. i � SCHEMATIC r RESIDENTIAL RUCK SYSTEM 1 1 'r � � i ' 0 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r I RUCK SYSTEM TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SEPTIC TANK: The septic tanks shall be the size septic tanks shown on the approved plans. The septic tanks shall be t capable of withstanding H-10 or H-20 loading as required and shall be reinforced concrete with removable covers. The septic tanks shall be as manufactured by Acme Precast Co., Inc. or equal ' approved by the Engineer. The septic tanks shall be installed on a level, stable base to the elevation shown on the plan. The ' Contractor shall ensure that the septic tank is waterproof and watertight by sealing the weep holes in the base of the septic tank and sealing the joint between the top and bottom halves with hydraulic cement. After sealing the septic tank, the septic tank will be filled to capacity with potable water and allowed to ' set for 48 hours. If the septic tank leaks, then the Contractor shall pump the septic tank dry and seal whatever leaks exist. The test shall be repeated until the tank is watertight. TEES: The tees shall be installed as shown on the plan and shall be constructed from Schedule 40 PVC pipe. Gas ' baffles shall be installed on the outlet tees. Use Tuftite gas baffles or approved equal. The tee shall be concreted into the septic tanks by grout or hydraulic cement. This joint shall be watertight and ' waterproof. DISTRIBUTION BOXES: ' The distribution boxes shall be six 6 hole as manufactured b Acme Precast Co. Inc. or equal � ) Y approved. The six hole distribution box shall be set on a 6" minimum thickness bed of compacted gravel. 1 The Contractor shall furnish and install risers manufactured by the same precast manufacturer as the ' distribution box. The risers shall be readily fitted to the top of the distribution box and extended to a manhole at finish grade. A precast concrete frame and cover shall be furnished and installed at grade. ' RUCK SAND FILTER: ' The Ruck sand filter shall be installed on a base of compacted sand at the elevation shown on the plan. The Ruck sand filter shall consist of an impermeable liner and a series of alternating sand, stone and in-drain layers. The liner shall be "Permalon" containment liner as manufactured by Reef Industries, Inc. ' or equal approved by the Engineer. The liner shall be installed on a 6" layer of sand described above. ' The Contractor shall wet the sand as necessary to make the sand more manageable for shaping the side slopes. If the Contractor is unable to retain the sand, the Contractor shall rake to a 1" depth the shaped sides to insure no roots, stones or other objects rest directly on or near the liner. The Contractor shall furnish and install the liner per the manufacturer's instructions. The Contractor shall ' furnish and install pipe boots for the pipe lines that intersect the lines. The boots shall be installed per the manufacturer's instructions and the pipe boots shall result in watertight joints with no leaking at the pipe ' entrances and exits. The Ruck filter shall be installed as shown on the plans. The Contractor shall install the piping, crushed . stone, sand, in-drains and filter cloth as shown on the plan. Each layer must be installed level. The crushed stone shall be washed 1/8" to 1/2" stone free of iron, fines and dust. ' The sand shall have a D 10 (particle diameter at the 10% finer point) of between 0.16 to 0.20 mm. The sand shall have a ratio of D60/D10 of less than 5, with less than 4% to pass the #100 sieve. The ' Contractor shall furnish a grain size analysis of a representative sample of the sand. ' The filter cloth shall be Typar 4301 by Linq Geotextile Division or approved equal by the Engineer. The piping shall be Schedule 40 PVC pipe and perforated or solid as shown on the plan. One vent pipe ' shall be piped back to the house and either vented through the roof or tied into the plumbing stack above all inverts. The other vent pipe shall be installed in a location approved by the Owner and Engineer with the tee installed, a minimum of 3' above the finish grade. The vents shall have insect screens over the ' openings. ' The in-drains shall be manufactured by Elgin Corporation of Storrs, CT. The in-drains shall be packed in the sand and installed per the manufacturer's directions. ' PERMALON CONTAINMENT LINER Reef Industries, Inc. Phone: 1-800- 231-2417 P.O. Box 750245 Fax: 1-713-507-4295 ' Houston, TX 77275-0245 Contact Person: Lynn Ciolli FILTER FABRIC ' Everett J. Prescot, Inc. (EJP) Phone: 508-580-3350 155 Bodwell Street Fax: 508-584-7036 Avon Industrial Park Approved product: Drainage Cloth 130EX ' Avon, MA. 02322 Contact Person: Barry Sullivan �. INDRAINS (Also referred to as RUCK filter fins) Eljen Indrain Corp. Phone: 1-800-444-1359 15 West Road - Fax: 1-860-487-1124 ' Storrs, CT �06268 Contact Person: Jim Donlan 1 � Z 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M 1 1 1 1 ' 1 z ' 1 1 f ' SYSTEM MONITORING The Department of Environmental Protection requires that the RUCK system be monitored quarterly for ' pH, BOD5 , TSS, TKN, NO3-N, and ammonia. Testing shall begin two months after the system is put. into operation. After four successful sampling events, at the request of the owner, the local approving ' authority may reduce or eliminate the monitoring requirements. The system shall be open to inspection and sampling by the Department of Environmental Protection and the local approving authority at all times. Sample Acquisition & Analysis ' Laboratory analysis of all samples and sample collection shall be done using methods approved by the Department of Environmental Protection or the local approving authority. For each sampling event, samples shall be taken as follows: 1.) Greywater influent from the greywater septic tank. 2.) The ' distribution box. 3.) Effluent from the blackwater septic tank. Water meter readings shall be recorded for each sampling event. A successful sampling event shall be defined as a concentration of less than 19 mg/L of total nitrogen from the distribution box sample. Samples from the septic tanks shall be taken 12" ' below the bottom of the scum layer such that none of the scum is collected in the sampling vessel. Any scum or other solids shall be filtered from a sample before nitrogen analysis are performed. Chain of custody documents shall be maintained for all samples and sample events. Laboratory results and water ' meter readings shall be provided to the Department of Environmental Protection, the Board of Health, the owner, and Innovative RUCK Systems, Inc. Results are to be filed on an annual basis before January ' 31 for the preceding year at the following address: 1.)Department of Environmental Protection ' 20 Riverside Drive Route 105 Lakeville, MA. 02347 ' Bard of Health 2.) o , Town of Barnstable ' P.O. Box 534 Barnstable, MA. 02601 ' 3.)Innovative RUCK Systems, Inc. 200 Main Street Falmouth, MA. 02540 ' Any test results with a concentration greater than 19 mg/L of total nitrogen from the distribution box sample will be transmitted to the Department of Environmental Protection, Innovative RUCK Systems ' and the Board of Health within seven days. If the test results in a concentration greater than 19mg/L of total nitrogen from the distribution box sample, a retest of the distribution box effluent is required. If blackwater or greywater effluent shows a total nitrogen concentration greater than 50 mg/L, the septic ' tank effluent will be retested. If the retest of the distribution box effluent shows a total nitrogen concentration greater than 19 mg/L, contact Innovative RUCK Systems within two days. (Phone : 1- 800- 659- 7825) � � ' 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 M 1 1 E i � �, � ' � i Ruck System Maintenance Avareement ' I am a licensed septic system inspector in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and agree to perform the following services to the septic system located at the address below. RUCK systems are served by two septic tanks, a greywater septic tank and a blackwater.septic ' tank. System shall be inspected at least every two years Al Inspect Septic Tanks for Required Pumping under the Following Criteria. 1. Inspect the condition of the tanks. 2. Measure the distance between bottom of scum/grease layer and bottom of the outlet baffle. 3. Measure the distance between top of scum layer and top of outlet tee. 4. Measure the thickness of the scum/grease layer. 5. Measure the sludge layer and distance from sludge to outlet tee. ' 6. Inspect the condition of the inlet and outlet tees. 7. Report any evidence of leakage into or out of the tank. !` 8. Report any evidence of any backup of effluent.. * Pumping required if: 1.) Sludge is within 12" of outlet tee or baffle. 2.) Bottom of the scum layer is within 2" of the bottom of the outlet tee. 3.) Top of the scum layer is within 2" of top of the outlet tee. B ) Inspect the Vents for Evidence of Clogging and/or Blockage. ' Annually inspect ect vent tee and insure insect screen is inplace and that no bird or insect nest is blocking the vent. Owner and Address of System to be Inspected: ' Telephone Signature of Owner: Date ' dress of Name and Ad Inspector: Telephone Signature of Inspector: Date License No. Issue Date Annual fee for the services described abov e: r i ` 4 i ' 1 � r 1 I ` ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RUCK SYSTEM FACT SHEET FOR HOMEO WAIVERS Your home's wastewater is treated by a RUCK System. RUCK Systems are designed to remove ' nitrogen from wastewater, before being discharged into the environment. Nitrogen in groundwater eventually takes the form of nitrates which can travel long distances in the groundwater. High levels of nitrates can be a health threat to people in addition to having adverse erects on water quality in harbors, ' estuaries, bays, and marine environments of all types. The wastewater from your home is_separated into two categoriesdomes from all the other fixtures led "blackwater" and in Blackwater comes from the toilets and the kitchen sunk. Greywater the home. The blackwater and the greywater are separated within the house and flow from the house into RUK two separate septic tanks. The blackwater then flows' h the through ter thathas filter eft before he house has nnow t been greywater in the greywater septic tank. All of the wastewater collected in the greywater septic tank. From this point it flows into a distribution box and is discharged to the environment by what is called a soil absorption system. This system may be in the form of a leaching ' field or a leaching trench configuration. ' The RUCK filter is served by two vents. One vent runs back to the house and up through the roof. The other vent is outside the house. It is important that these vents do not become blocked as they provide air to the RUCK filter. This supply of air is critical to the treatment of the wastewater. If the vents are ' blocked, the RUCK system will malfunction and noxious odors may be emitted. The most important components of your wastewater treatment system as a whole are the septic tanks. ' These tanks are designed to allow solids materials to settle out of the wastewater. It is important that this settled out sludge does not overburden the septic tank and allow solid materials to escape with the water leaving the septic tank. These suspended solids will clog the RUCK filter or the soil absorption system. ' The maintenance schedule you have been provided with has been designed to insure that sludge build up is checked, and that the sludge is removed by a licensed septic hauler. The tanks should be inspected each year. The frequency of septic tank pumping intervals will be dependent on the volume and composition of wastewater passing assin through the tank. ' Do not dispose of non-biodegradeable materials such as sanitary napkins, disposable diapers, and other such material into your system. You should not dispose of cooking oil, fat, or grease in your system as this will accelerate the clogging of the septic tanks and/or soil absorption system and the result will be increased pumping costs. The system is not designed to treat hazardous materials such as cleaning solvents, pesticides, acids, ' disinfectants, gasoline, oils, kerosene or any other chemical substance that will interfere with the wastewater treatment system. Residential wastewater treatment systems can not properly treat such hazardous materials and they will pass through the system only to be discharged into the environment. ' Theproper o eration of your on septic system is critical to the health of the environment and your P enjoyment of that environment. ' be aware that our wastewater treatment system has been designed based on the As an owner, you should Y number of bedrooms in your home. Any additions to the home will require the approval of the Board of Health as well as the Building Inspector. Your system is not designed to accept waste from a garbage disposal. You should not connect a garbage disposal to your system without approval from the engineer who designed your system, as well as the Board of Health. The nitrogen removal capabilities of the system only provide high tlevels should be dumped into the black e to tstor er and for that reason, any ammonia based cleaners or dairy prods the kitchen sink. Dumping any exotic chemical compounds into the' system emitted from the vents. Normally, the the bacteria within the system and this will cause foul odors to be vents do not smell. If a foul odor is present and persists, wastewateron box and soil absorption components may have backed up into the RtCK filter. If a foul odor is being emitted from the vents, the distribu of the system should be inspected. If you would like the vent moved ' of Health. The system lwill fail to on for aesthetic or contact the design engineer and the Board some other reason, nitrogen if the vent is not properly located. The design engineer and installat ion contractor information should be recorded in the event that there are any problems or questions that you may have in the future. r ENGINEER : INNOVATIVE RUCK SYSTEMS INC. CONTACT PERSON. Step'— T Silva ' ADDRESS : 200 Main Street Falmouth MA 02540 TELEPHONE: 508- 548- 3564 1 INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR : 1 CONTACT PERSON: ADDRESS TELEPHONE: r J 1 1 1 1 1 1 lip 1 � s 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 J 1 � � 5 III M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Commonwealth of Massachusetts ' Executive Office of Environmental Affairs ®epartment of Environmental Protection ' William F.Weld GOMM S. �:r�O A ' Thomas B. Powers Awing C CERTIFICATION FOR GENERAL USE Pursuant to Title 5, 310 CMR 15 . 000 Name and Address of Applicant: ' Holmes and McGrath, Inc. 200 Main Street Falmouth, MA 02540 ' Trade name of technology and model numbers: Ruck System as shown on the plans approved by the Department for residential flows under 2000 gallons per day (hereinafter the "System") . Date of Application: December 23 , 1994 ' Transmittal Number: 97894 Date of Issuance: March 24 , 1995 Effective date: March, 31, 1995 Expiration date: March 31, 2000 Authority for Issuance ' Pursuant to Title 5 of the State Environmental Code, 310 CMR 15 . 000, the Department of Environmental Protection hereby issues this Certification for General Use to: Holmes and McGrath, Inc. , 200 Main Street, Falmouth, MA 02540 (hereinafter of"the Massachusetts, certifying for general use in the Commonwealth of the System described herein. The Department has determined that the applicant has demonstrated that the System will provide a level of environmental protection - at least equivalent to that of a standard on-site system designed and constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15. 000 and will provide are conditionedaoneanditrogen removal. Sale and use of the Sys and the System subject to compliance by the Company Y owner/operator with the terms and conditions set forth below. Any noncompliance with the terms or conditions of this Certification constitutes a violation of 310 CMR 15. 000. l S�k' . John J. kiiggins,� ting Director Date ivision of Wat _ I' llution Control Department of Environmental Protection ' Ruck General Use Certification Page: 2 ' Design Standards I 1 . The System shall be installed in a manner which does stem not adversely affect the operation of a title 5 sy as constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15 . 100 - 15 .279 , subject to the Provisions of this Certification. 2 . New Construction: In accordance with 310 CMR 15 .2re s i an increase in calculated nitrogen loading per acre s allowed. with the use of the System. The System may be used in areas subject to nitrogen loading limitations , 310 CMR 15 .214 . When used in such areas, the allowable 1 loading for the System shall be for up to 660 gallons per day of design flow per acre. Total nitrogen concentration in the effluent 55% of shall then�nfluentexceed total mg/liter and a minimum nitrogen concentration shall be removed. 3 . Areas with approved nitrogen loading plans : For the ' purpose of aggregate determination of allowable flows and nitrogen loadings per 310 CMR 15 .216 (1) , for residential flows of less than 2, 000 gpd, nitrogen loading of 19 mg/liter of effluent shall be used for Systems installed under this Certification. 4 . Expansions to existin residential homes : For any texisting 2 bedroom residential home, as of March 31, 1995 , in areas subject to nitrogen loading limitations , 310 CMR 15 .214 , the following expansions shall be ' permitted with the use of this System: a. With an existing minimum lot size of 10 , 000 sq. ft. , up to 3 bedr ' b. With an existing minim m lot size of 15 , 000 sq. ft. , up to 4 bedroomsgpd) . For any existing 3 bedroom residential home, as of March 31, 1995 , in areas subject to nitrogen loading limitations, 310 CMR 15 .214, the following expansions shall be permitted with the use of this System: with an ' existing minimum lot size of 15 , 000 sq. ft . , up to 4 bedrooms (440 gpd) . II. General Conditions ' 1 . All provisions of 310 CMR 15 . 000 are applicable to the use of this System, the owner/operator, and the Company, except those which specifically have been ' varied by the terms of this Certification. signed by 2 , plans and specificationReshall be stamped and istered Professional dEngine�er either a Massachusetts Registered Sanitarian. or a Massachusetts Reg ;n and ' operation and maintenance, .monitor_ g 3 . Any required p testing shall be perfia ed p,nyarequisedesampleaanalysis Department approved p ' Ruck General Use Certification Page: 3 ' shall be conducted by an independent U.S . EPA or Commonwealth of Massachusetts approved testing ' laboratory, or an approved 'independent university laboratory, unless otherwise provided in the Department ' s written approval . It shall be a violation of this Certification to falsify any data collected• pursuant to an approved testing plan, to omit any required data or to fail to submit any report required ' by such plan. 4 . The facility served by the System and the System itself shall be open to inspection and sampling by the ' Department and the local approving authority at all reasonable times. 5 . The Department and/or the local approving authority may ' require the owner or operator of the System to cease operation of the system and/or to take any other action as it deems necessary to protect public health, safety, welfare and the environment. 6 . The owner or operator shall provide written notice of this Certification, prior to the signing of a purchase ' and sale agreement for the facility served by the System or any portion thereof, to any new owner or operator. ' 7 . The Department has not determined that the performance of the System will provide a level of protection to public health and safety and the environment that is at ' least equivalent to that of a sewer system. Accordingly, no new System shall be constructed, and no System shall be upgraded or expanded, except as ' provided for in 310 CMR 15 . 004 (i .e. if it is feasible to connect the facility to a sanitary sewer, a variance as provided for in 310 CMR 15 . 004 (4) (b) must be ' obtained for use of the System) . 8 . Design and installation shall be in strict conformance _ with the company' s DEP approved plans and ' specifications, 310 CMR 15 . 000 and this Certification. ' III. Special Conditions applicable to the .Systam Owner/Operator 1. The System is certified in connection with the ' discharge of sanitary wastewater only. Any non-sanitary wastewater generated and/or used at the facility served by the System shall not be introduced into the System ' and shall be lawfully disposed of. 2 . If the System will be a shared system as defined by 15 . 002, or a part thereof, the financial assurance requirements for shared systems as may be required ' pursuant to 15 .290 (2) shall apply. 3 . Maintenance agreement : ' i. Throughout its life, the System shall be under ,a maintenance agreement . No maintenance agreement ' Page: 4 Ruck General Use Certification ' shall be for less than two years . ii. No System shall be used until a maintenance b the ' agreement and contingency plan are approved Y Department and the local approving authority ' - which: provides for the contracting of a person or firm competent in providing services consistent with the system' s specifications and the operation and ' maintenance requirements specified by the design engineer and any specified by the Department; contains procedures for notification to the ' Department and the local board of health within 24 hours of . a System failure or alarm event and for corrective measures fthee taken Massachusettsacertified - provides the name o stem operator or operators that will operate the sy in accordance with Massachusetts regulations 257 ' CMR 2 : 00 . 1 f the System shall at all times 4 . The owner/operator o maintain the System in accordance .properly operate and with the Department. approved plan. 5 . The owner/operator shall furnish the Department within a reasonable time any information which the Department may request to determine whether cause exists this for modifying, revoking, reissuing or terminating Certification or to determine whether the company terms and/or the owner/ operator is complying with the and conditions of this Certification and 310 CMR 15 . 000 . from the system shall be 6 . Influent and effluent monitored quarterly At a minimum the following parameters shall be monitored time P, BOD5, effluentTKN, NO3- ' N, and ammonia. If at any the system shall be Nitrogen is higher than 19 mg/1 Y monitored weekly for the next four weeks . Each time the System is monitored, the water meter' reading alsoedhtol be recorded. All monitoring data shall the Department by January 31 of each year. The ' monitoring may be- incorporated into the maintenance program. ' licable to the Company Iv. Special Conditions app 1 . The Company annually shall submit' to the by January 3.1 of each year, a report, signed by a corporate officer, general partner or Company owner, stating, for the previous calendar year, the number of. ' units sold for use in Massachuse tts. The include at a minimum the location of each System, owner' s name and address, the type of use (e.g. ' residential, commercial, school, etc. ) and the design '. Page: 5 Ruck General Use Certification ' flow, all known failures, malfunctions, and corrective actions taken and the location of each such event. ' 2 . The Company shall notify the Director of the Division of Water Pollution Control at leasttheft ownership of days in advance of the proposed transfer of technology for which this Certification is issued. The ' notice shall include the name and address of the new owner, the date of transfer, and the respective responsibilities of the parties relative to the System. All provisions of this Certification applicable to the Company shall be applicable to the successors and ' assigns of the Company. 3 . The Company shall furnish the Department within a reasonable time any information which the Department ' requests to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking, reissuing or terminating this Certification or to determine whether the Company and/or any owner/ operator is complying with the terms and conditions of this Certification and 310 CMR 15 . 000 . purchaser of the System ' 4 . The Company shall provide any with a copy of this - Certification prior to sale of the System. In any contract for distribution and/or sale of the System, the Company shall require the distributor he purchaser of the System, prior or seller to provide t to any sale of the System, with a copy of this ' Certification. 5 . If the Company wishes to use a System installe under this Certification as a piloting or provisional use demonstration site, the Company shall submit to the ' Department the following: * a copy of the complete application submitted to ' the local approving authority, * the written approval of the local approving authority, and * a notice that the Company wishes to use this '-site tas a demonstration site for their piloting or provisional .use application. 6 . If the Company wishes to continue this Certificaiiofor after its expiration date, the Company shall apply and obtain a renewal of this Certification. The Company shall submit a renewal application at least 180 days before the expiration date of this . Certification, unless written permission for a later date has been granted in writing by the Department. ' Ruck General use certification Page: 6 V. Reporting t All notices- and documents required to be submitted to the Department by this Certification shall be submitted to : ' Director, Division of Water Pollution Control Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street - 8th floor. Boston, Massachusetts 02108 ' e artment vI. Rights of the D p _ ' The Department may suspend, modify or revoke this Certification for cause, including, but not limited to, non- thiscompliance with the terms of of the annual compliance assanceCert feelfion fortobtainingptheent Certification by misrepresentation or failure to disclose. fully all relevant facts or any change in or discovery of ' conditions that would constitute grounds for discontinuance of the Certification, -- or. ertification, or. as necessary for the protectioent, andasof public health, safety, welfare or ' authorized by applicable law. The Department reserves its rights to take any enforcement action authorized by law with respect to this Certification and/or the System against the ' owner or operator of the System and/ or the Company. ' VII. Expiration date Notwithstanding the expiration date of this Certification, ' any System sold and installed prior to the expiration date of this Certification, and approved, installed and maintained in compliance with this Certification (as it may ' be modified) and 310 CMR 15 . 000, may remain in use unless the Department, the local approval authority, or a court requires the System to be modified or removed, or requires ' discharges to the System to cease. ' VI==• Right of Appeal This Certification is an action of the Department .udicatory person aggrieved by this action may request an 7 hearing. A request for a hearing st be edine writing and postmarked within thirty (3 0) days of the of issuance of this Certification. Tinder 310 CMR 1. 01 (6) (b) e est must state clearly and concisely the facts which are the grounds 'for the request, and the relief so g hearing request along with a valid check payable to Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the amount of one hundred ' General Use Certification Pages 7 Ruck ' dollars ($100 . 00) must be mailed to: ' Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection P.O. Box 4062 tBoston, MA 02211 The request will be dismissed if the filing fee is not paid, ' unless the appellant is exempt or granted a waiver as described below. The filing fee is not required if the appellant is a city or town (or municipal agency) , county, ' or district of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or a municipal housing authority. The Department may waive the adjudicatory hearing filing fee for a person who shows that ' paying the fee will create an undue financial hardship. A person seeking a waiver must file, together with the hearing request as provided above, an affidavit setting forth the facts believed to support the claim of undue financial hardship. 1 r 1 � s 1 1 1 � r 1 1 1 ' 1 � 9 1 1 1 M 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ' Commonwealth of Massachusetts mu Executive Office of Environmental Affairs le artnment of • Environmental Protection William F.Weld Trudy Coxe "Mor Argeo Paul Celiuccl' Struhs is Goren+or David B. truhs commimaner November 9, 1995 Mr. Michael B. McGrath, President ' Innovative RUCK Systems, Inc. 200 Main Street, Room 201 Falmouth, MA 02540 ' Re: RUCK System Dear Mr. McGrath: As a response to your letter dated July 31, 1995 , the ' Department would like to clarify the following with regards to the General Use Certification of the Ruck System: 1. The RUCK system shall be used with septic tanks that meet the following criteria: minimum effective liquid capacity of 200% of the design flow or a minimum detention time of 48 ' hours, whichever is greater; in no case shall the effective liquid capacity of the tank as measured below the outlet invert elevation be less than 1, 000 gallons . At least two 20 ' inch manholes shall be provided for 1, 000 gallon septic tanks, larger tanks shall be equipped with at least three 20 inch manholes . ' 2 . The system shall be monitored at the following points : effluent from the blackwater septic tank, greywater influent ' to the greywater septic tank and at the distribution box. The System shall be monitored quarterly, for pH, BODS, TSS, TKN, NO3-N, and ammonia. Testing of the system shall commence six months after the system is put into operation. After four successful sampling events, at the request of the owner/operator, the local approving authority may reduce or eliminate the monitoring requirements. 3 . The top of all system components, including the septic tanks, the RUCK system, distribution box and soil absorption ' system can be installed with no more than 6 feet of cover below finish grade. If the soil absorption system is installed with more than 6 feet of cover, venting shall be ' provided. One Winter Street 0 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 0 FAX(617) 556-1049 'o Telephone(617) 292-5500 I - s 2 Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please tcontact Christos Dimisioris of my staff at (617) , 292-5912 . ' Sincerely, J tor ' isionk.of Water"Pollution Control t CD/RUCK.LTR r r I ' 1 1 � L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Voi. 2.. no. a. Octooer-Decemoer 1992. Copynght Q 1992. A 677 South Segoe Road.Madison. WI 53711 USA ' Wastewater Renovation in Buried and Recirculating Sand Filters A.J. Gold,' B.E. Lamb, G.W. Loomis, J.R. Boyd, V.J.- CabeIIi, and C.G. McKiel ' ABSTRACT that sand filters can be a useful component in systems A replicated. multiyear field study was conducted to assess the re- that rely on nitrification followed by denitrificatton to ' duction of N,P and microbial indicators by a recircuiating sand filter remove N from wastewater (Laak et al., 1981. Lamb (RSF) and a buried multilayer sand filter patterned after the RUCK et al., 1990). The long—term ability of sand filters to filter.The RSFs received 38 L m-'d-' of septic tank effluent,while permanently remove N, P, and indicators of microbial the buried sand filters were loaded at 76 L m-I d-'.The RSFs had pathogens is not as well documented. significantly greater reductions of N and P(21 and 31%,respectively) Recirculating free-access sand filters and buried than the buried filters(8 and 1%.respectively);however,N reduction multilayer filters are two designs that have been widely was not significantly different per unit area.The lower daily loading used for On-site treatment in the USA. The RSF typ- ' rate and even distribution of effluent on the recirculating filters may ically recirculates wastewater four to five times through have contributed to the elevated P reductions noted. Total Kjcldahl the sand filter media before it is discharged (Hines N (TKN) reductions in the RSFs were markedly lower during the and Favreau, 1975; USEPA, 1980). Most RSF's are cold season (510'Q than the warm season.In contrast.TKN reduc- not buried and effluent is often sprayed onto the media tions in the buried sand filters were relatively constant.except during surface. Because of maintenance, mechanical and aes- the coldest periods of winter. Substantial TKN reductions occurred thetic considerations associated with the RSF's, there under acidic conditions. During warm weather sampling, both types is continued interest in the use of gravity fed, buried of filters dramatically reduced levels of fecal coliform. enterecocei, sand filters. tand F male-specific bacteriophage.During cold conditions,the buried Buried Sand filters require careful design IO ensure sand filters produced greater reductions of fecal cofifornts and enter• aerobic conditions. Maintaining well-aerated media is ococci levels, while neither filter consistently reduced the levels of Clostridium perfringens or F ph2gC.Increased reductions in fecal col- particularly challenging if buried filters discharge di- ' iform. crtterococci and F phage were associated with lower effluent rectly to the soil from an underdrain outlet pipe (Lack pH for both sand filters. et al., 1981) or are located in slowly permeable soils (Kristiansen, 1981a). Laak (1991) has developed a ' buried filter, called a RUCK filter, equipped with aer- ation tubes and percolation indrains designed to pro- ON-srM DISPOSAL of household wastewater is a mote an aerobic environment throughout the filter. potential threat to public health and environ- Assessing the long-term attenuation capacity of sand ' mental quality. The use of a septic tank followed by filters requires analysts of"mature" filters over a range a soil absorption system can markedly reduce the con- of climatic conditions. Over time, sand filters develop centrations of many contaminants before they reach complex microbial ecosystems as a result of interac- 'the groundwater, provided that appropriate site and tions between the media and the wastewater effluent soil characteristics exist (Cogger, 1989; Reneau et Al., (Pell et al., 1990). During the initial 6 to 12 months 1989). In situations where soil conditions may impede of use, nutrient retention can occur in sand filters wastewater treatment (Kristiansen, 1981a; Pell and through mechanisms such as adsorption to soil parti- 'Nyberg, 1989a) or where the surrounding environ- cles or incorporation into living biomass or dead or ment is highly susceptible to wastewater contami- ganic matter (Kristiansen, 1981a; Pell and Nyberg, nants, such as sites adjacent to estuaries or overlying 1989a; Pell et al., 1990). These mechanisms appear 'highly permeable aquifers (Laak et al., 1981; Lamb to only be temporary or finite removal mechanisms, et al., 1990), sand filters have been used to enhance however. Temperature has been shown to influence wastewater treatment. Sand filters typically receive both nitrification (Kristiansen, 1981b) and attenuation lseptic tank effluent and discharge effluent to either the of microbial contaminants (Rencau et al., 1989), which soil directly below the filter media, to a spatially sep- suggests the need for field investigations to comple- arate conventional soil absorption system, or to sur- ment laboratory studies. face water following disinfection. The purpose of this study was to compare the long- Sand filters are designed to provide an unsaturated, term performance of mature RSF's and buried single- aerobic 'environment for wastewater treatment. Pre- pass sand filters for the removal of N, P and microbial vious research has demonstrated that sand filters can indicators. A replicated multiyear field study was con- Edramatically lower biochemicaI'oxygen demand (BOD) ducted to permit seasonal analyses and statistical com- ,and suspended solids (Hines and Favrcau, 1975; Ef- parisons between systems. fort ct al., 1985; Soltman, 1990) as well as nitrify fuch of the N in septic tank effluent (Loudon et al., MATERIALS AND METHODS l'9,85; Pell and Nyberg, 1989b; Lamb et al., 1990). Site Location and Design csc observations suggest that the use of sand filters can improve the long-term infiltration capacities of The buried filters and RSF's were the aerobic compo- �oil absorption systems (Sicgrist and Boyle, 1987) and nents of two different N removal on-site sewage disposal systems in a field laboratory at the Univ. of Rhode Island Jep. of Natural Resources Science, Univ. of Rhode Island, (Lamb et al., 1987. Lamb et al., 1990). Three replicates Kingston. RI 028S1. Received G Aug. 1991. *Corresponding au- were constructed of each type of system, with the dimen- hor. Abbreviations: TKN, total Kjeidaht nitrogen; BOD, biochemical lublis'hcd in 1. Environ. pual. 21:720-725 (1992) oxygen demand; RSF, recirculating sand filter. 7-7n GOLD ET AL. WASTEWATER RENOVATION IN SAND Fit= 721 ' ,ions of each replicate approximately one-fifth scale of a proximately 155 to 195 L m-2 d-' with a forward flow of P PP y P Y systcm servicing a home with an average of 3.5 people. septic tank effluent through the system of 38 L in d-'. ' Each replicate received approximately 115 L of wastewater per day, with the wastewater passing through a series of Sampling Schedule septic tanks/dosing tanks prior to entering the filters. The characteristics of the wastewater entering the filtering units Septic tank and sand filter effluent samples were taken ' is shown in Table I. concurrently on a triweekly basis from April 1987 to De- cember 1988 and on a monthly/bimonthly basis from Jan- Buried Sand Filters uary 1989 to May 1990. Samples were not analyzed for all parameters on every sampling date. Phosphorus was ana- ' The buried filters were modeled after designs established lyzed only from February 1989 to May 1990; microbial for the RUCK filters (Lank et al., 1981; Laak. 1982; Laak, parameters in Match 1989,August 1989 and February, 1990; 1985, personal communication). Each filter was 1.22 in by and 5-d biochemical oxygen demand (BOD,) on selected 1.22 in by 1.22 in deep, and was capped with a 1.25-cm samples during the course of the study.The filters had been ' wood cover and buried approximately 15 cm below the in continuous operation since June 1986, 10 months prior ground surface. The filters were comprised of alternating to the beginning of this study. 25-cm layers of granitic sand (effective diam. of 0.25 mm, uniformity coefficient of 4.0) and 5- to 10-cm layers of Chemical Analyses ' washed stone (2-5 cm). The total volume of sand media in y each filter was 1.05 in-). Percolation indrains were located Samples were analyzed for temperature, pH, alkalinity in the upper two sand layers and aeration tubes, connected and BOD, upon collection -(USEPA, 1983). After preser- to surface vents, were placed in each stone layer to decrease vation, samples were later analyzed for: TKN (total Kjel- ' the likelihood of filter clogging or the development of an- dahl N) and total P by the block digester method (Eastin, aerobic conditions. 1978; USEPA, 1983) with subsequent ammonium-N de- Septic tank effluent was pressure dosed to a distribution terminations by the colorimetric salicylate-hypochlorite box up-gradient from each filter 12 times per day (every method (Bower and Holm-Hansen, 1980) and orthophos- other hour) in equal increments. From the distribution boxes, phorus determinations by an ascorbic acid method (Alpkem effluent flowed by gravity through each filter. Each filter Corp, 1986); and nitrate-N and nitrite-N (NO,-N + received septic tank effluent at a hydraulic loading rate of NO_-N) by automated Cd reduction (Technicon Industrial ' approximately 76 L m-= d-'. Systems, 1973; Lambert and Oviatt, 1986; Alpkern Corp., 1986). In this paper, NO i-N and NO Z-N concentrations Recirculating Sand Filters are combined and reported as NO;-N. The RSF's were designed according to specifications of Microbial Analyses - the USEPA (1980) and Loudon et al. (1985). Each filter was 1.22 in by 2.44 rat by 1.22 in deep and was surface All microbial assays were performed by membrane fil exposed. A single type of granitic sand media (effective tration within 8 h of sample collection as follows: fecal ' diam. of 1.0 mm, uniformity coefficient of 3.0) was used coliforms by the mTEC method (Dufour et al., 1981; Ca- in the filters. The total volume of sand media in each filter belli et al., 1982); enterococci by the modified mE method was 2.82 m3. The recirculation tank associated with each (Levin et al., 1975; Dufour, 1980); C perfringens by the filter was a 1136-L (300 gal) polyethylene tank. mCP method (Bisson and Cabelli, 1979); and F male-spe- ' Septic tank effluent was pressure dosed to the recircu- cific bacteriophage.by the method described by Debarto- lation tank component of each filter 12 times per day in lorneis (1988). Levels of enterococci bacteria were measured equal increments. A pump in the recirculation tank pumped because they have better survival rates and correlation to effluent to a distribution manifold situated on top of each swimming-associated illness in marine waters than fecal ' sand filter once every hour from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. coliform (Cabelli et al., 1983; Cabelli, 1983); C. perfrin- After passing through the filter, effluent either returned to gees was used as a "conservative" tracer because it pro- the recirculation tank or discharged to the rest of the system duces environmentally resistant endospores, and the F male- depending on the water level in the recirculation tank. The specific bacteriophages were enumerated as'a simulant for ' filter was designed with a recirculation ratio of 4:1 to 5:1; the environmental behavior of the Norwalk virus (Keswick each filter replicate received a daily hydraulic load of ap- et al., 1985). ' Table 1.Average chemical composition of sand filter influent. Statistical Analyses Treatments were compared for total N removal and total Mean z SEt P removal by a repeated measure analvsis of variance. Parameter Mt Treatment comparisons were made over the entire 3-yr study ' pH 73 = 0.03 period and for warm (>10 "C) and cold (<_10 °C) season (39) performance. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test (Bhattacharyya Alkalinity. mg L-' CaCO, 230.9 = 4.00 and Johnson, 1977)was used to compare both the reduction (38) of microbial indicators between treatments and the seasonal -mg L-'- total N removal and total P removal within each treatment. TOC 47.5 = 13.65 1101), 92.1 (4)1033 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (19) Operation and Maintenance NO;-N 0.04 = 0.00 (39) There were no periods of prolonged ponding on any Total N 52.0 = 1.21 ' (39) of the filters throughout the 3-yr study, although the Total f 3.7 = 0.18 recirculating filters occasionally experienced ponding (12) for brief periods immediately after dosing. No main sl: = stanuaru error.:; = number of samples. tenance was ever performed on the buried sand filters. Table 2. Percentage of total N removal and total P removal 9o- in recirculating (RSF) and buried sand filters. so Total N Total P `-- ' removal removal 70� s • Time period Mean (n) Mean (n) 60� t tt • • . r, • 70 - 507. • • y • of • nnual ARecircuiating filler 20.4 (117) 31.9 (35) •t0-4 • . ° .• . ■ ° . • Buried filter 8.4 (111) 0.9 (34) ■�• • ' ' Statistical differencet '• " 30-■■■� ; ° •.� ; ' Warm season (temp. >10°C) 201 °■ •~ 1 ;. f Recirculating filter 20.0 (48) 33.4 (17) + .+` . ■ Buried filter 6.4 (66) 0.3 (17) t o.4 Statistical difference ; ' ' Cold season (temp. -< 100C) 0 -�� ■� Recirculating filter 21.2 (48) 30.5 (18) 1987 Nov MAY t�01 aMAYr:o: Buried filler 11.5 (45) 1.4 (17) ' �988 389 990 Statistical difference •• " Fig. 1.Concentrations of N in wastewater influent and cfnucn ' from recirculating sand filters. Virtually nil the TKN it •'Significant differences observed. P< 0.01. effluent was Nil;-N. t Results of.a repeated measures ANOVA between treatments within a given time period. ' 90-1 ^ In contrast the RSF's required raking and weeding 80 • • EFFLUENT %03 during each growing season and periodic maintenance 0 .••. EFFLUEN- TKN ' during the winter to avoid icing of the orifices and 7 f filter. Routine maintenance is expected with RSF's 60 r; «, i•.f'. / (USEPA, 1980) and was not considered as a failure so, / r / • ' of the system. �� '. ■, , 1a nq �. ■ in a Nitrogen 30 a ■ •■.r■ °'"■ ■ • The removal of N from a wastcstrcam has been zo ! �•. A.shown to occur in essential) aerobic environments, : ' • . • such as sand filters (Otis et al., 1975; Loudon et al., 1985, Hanaki et al., 1990). In this study, the propor- 01 tion of N removed in the two types of sand filters was 987 Nov - MAY NOV MAY No�'490 MAY significantly different (P < 0.01) with a mean re- moval for the 3-yr study period of 20.4% for the RSF"s Fig.2.Concentrations of N in wastewater influent and effluent ' and 8.4% for the buried single-pass filters (Table 2). from buried sand filters. Virtually all the TKN in ctnucnt The RSF's were twice the size of the buried sand was NH;-N. filters and N removal was not significantly different ' per unit area. The average daily N removal was 433 compared to influent concentrations of 52 mg L'. mg m-' d-' and 369 mg m d-' for the recirculating The NO- was the dominant form of N in sand filtc: and buried sand filters, respectively. No apparent sea- effluent and constituted an average of 65.7 and 71.4 is sonaI pattern of N removal was observed in the RSF's. of the sand filter effluent total N for the recirculating Removal was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the and buried sand filters, respectively (Fig. 1, 2). buried sand filters during the cold season than in the Because other wastewater treatment studies have warm season. Throughout the study, both filter de- indicated that nitrification, and hence reduction of TKN, ' signs maintained some degree of aerobic treatment decreases with decreasing temperatures below 10 to with BODS concentrations of Iess than 5 mg L-' in 15 °C (Wild et al., 1971; Haug and McCarty, 1972; filter effluent. Kristiansen, 1981b), reduction of TKN in this study ' Given the extended length of the study, losses of N was also assessed on a seasonal basis (warm season from the sand filter wastestrcam were presumed to > 10 'C, cold:season _< 10 °C). Although warm sea- result from nitrification followed by denitrification, son TKN reductions were significantly higher (P < ' rather than from microbial immobilization. Although 0.01) than cold season reductions for both treatments, designed to function as aerobic environments for ni- seasonal differences were quite pronounced for the trification, sand filters can contain anaerobic microen- RSF's [84.1 ± 0.8% (mean = S.E.) vs. 56.9 vironments that provide sites for denitrification. 2.4%, warm vs. cold season respectively). During each resulting in the loss of N as N2 gas (Rittman and winter TKN concentrations in the .RSF effluent ap- Langeland, 1985). proached influent total N concentrations (Fig. 1). In Total N in the sand filter influent was almost en- contrast, TKN reductions for the buried sand filters ' tircly composed of TKN (Table 1). Over the 3-yr study were more constant throughout the year (75.6 = 0.9% TKN was reduced by an average of 73 to 74% in both vs. 71.5 = 1%, warm vs. cold season. respectively) sand filter designs with sand filter effluent containing and the proportion of filter effluent TKN to influent an ;wcral_c of l3 to 14 mr- L-' TKN (all as NH;-N) total N rose for very brief periods each, winter (Fie. GOLD LT AL: WASTEWATER RENOVATION IN SAND FILTER5 2). The differences in seasonal response between the in the recirculating filters and 0.9% (5.7 mg m-Zd-') two treatments coincides with the extent of exposure in the buried filters. Neither system exhibited signif- ' to surface temperatures; the RSF treatment was at the icant seasonal trends in P removal; however, a wide ground surface, while the buried sand filter treatment range of removal was observed in both filters during was relatively insulated by the wood cap and soil cover. the study period. On 5 of the 12 sampling dates, the Alkalinity and pH dynamics within the sand filters mean concentration. of total P in effluent from the ' can affect the transformation of NH;N to NO 3-N. buried sand filters exceeded influent concentrations. Stochiometrically, approximately 7.1 mg L- of This release of P from the filters may have resulted HCO.1 alkalinity as CaCO, is consumed per milligram from microbial dieoff and mineralization of organic ' liter-' NO -N produced (Haug and McCarty, 1972; films or from desorption from the filter media (Satter Piluk and Hao, 1989). Once the alkalinity of the sys- and Boyle, 1978). tem is depleted, the filter environment becomes acidic The comparatively higher P attenuation observed in (pH < 4.2) which can reduce transformation rates. In the RSF's may reflect the lower loading rate of septic ' this study TKN was routinely transformed to NO1-N tank effluent (38 L m-2d-1) compared to the buried under acidic conditions. The sand filter effluent in the filters (76 L m-2d-1) and the increased opportunities buried filters was acidic on most sampling dates for wastewater interaction with the system due to the ' throughout the year, while acidic effluent conditions multiple exposures inherent in the recirculating filter were generally restricted to the warm season-sampling design. Differences in P removal between the two types dates in the.RSF systems. During these periods, TKN of filters may also be associated with the manner of reduction ranged from 56 to 83% in the buried filters wastewater distribution to the filter surfaces. Waste-. and 71 to 96% in the RSF systems. The reductions in water was evenly distributed onto the RSF's as a result TKN observed in this study were comparable to the of pressure dosing through evenly spaced orifices, while results of other sand filter studies under a wide range the buried sand filters were gravity fed, creating the ' of pH and alkalinity conditions (Otis et al., 1975; potential for zones of varying infiltration (Pell et al., Sauer and Boyle, 1978; Kristiansen, 1981b; Laak et 1990). Uneven distribution has been shown to pro- al.. 1981; Loudon et al., 1985; Pell and Nyberg, mote preferential flow and decrease the potential for 1989a,b; Piluk and Hao, 1989; Windisch, 1990; Lamb P removal (Reneau et al., 1989). The media used in ' et at., 1990). In these sand filter studies TKN was all the sand filters was processed from the same gran- reduced by 50 to 100% with no clear relationship to itic bedrock, therefore, the mineralogy and potential the alkalinity or pH of the sand filter effluent. for P adsorption of all filter media was similar. The sand filters in this study were in continuous use Phosphorus for 2.6 yr before the P study began and are therefore representative of mature systems. Other studies have The two sand filter designs differed significantly (P found that substantial P attenuation can occur in sand < 0.01) with regard to P removal (Table 2). The RSF's filters during an initial start up .period (6 mon-2 yr) consistently removed more P than the buried filters from adsorption or precipitation on media surfaces with mean annual removals of 31.9% (49.3 mg m-2d-') (Sauer and Boyle, 1978; Anderson et al., 1985) or Table 3. Mean concentrations (CFU1100 mL) of fecal coliforms, C.perfringens, enterococci, and F phage (PFU1100 mL) in sand filter wastewater. Warm season Cold season 23 Aug. 1989 9 Mar. 1989 16 Mar. 1989 9 Feb. 1990 ' Buried SFt RSF Buried SF RSF Buried SF RSF Buried SF RSF Mean SF effluent 22.0 22.0 3.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 4.0 Temp. (°C) Mean SF effluent 3.5 3.0 6.2 7.4 65 7.4 3.9 7.8 PH . Fecal coliforms - Influent I.6 x 10' 1.7 x 10' 3.9 x 103 35 x 10' Z2 x 10' 25 x 10' 3.3 x 10' 3.0 x 10' ' Effluent 15xt0° 3.1x100 1.9x102 5.4xt4' 33x10' 4.0x103 1.4x10' 6.1x103 Log„reduction 5.03 4.74 33le 1.810 3.82• 1.800 4.370 1.69 Enterococei Influent 3.4x10' 3.1x104 3.0x104 2.8x104 6.5xIV 7.4x104 6.5x103 62x 10' Effluent <1 <1 1.6 x 100 65 x 10' 2.9 x I0° 92 x 10' 93 x 100 1.1 x IV Log,,reduction 453 4.49 427• 1.63• 435• 1.910 4.840 2.750 C.perfrfngens Influent 43 x 103 4.7 x 10' 1.7 x IV 13 x .10' 1.0 x 104 12 x 104 95 x 103 9.0 x I Effluent 22 x Iir 2 5 X 10, 3.1 x 101 3.7 x 10' 1.7 x 10: Z.7 x I 2.7 x 10, 5.5 x 10= ' Log„reduction 3.29• 2270 1.74 1.55 1.77 1.65 255• 1210 ph2gC Influent 1.8 x 104 2.0 x 10' >104 >10, 3.7 x IQ' 35 x 10, 3.8 x 10' 3.6 x I Effluent <1 <1 <I W <104 3.0 x 10' 1.7 x 10' <1 42 x 1 U' ' Log„reduction 426 430 >2.0 >2.0 2.09 231 5580 1.93• Treatment reduction of organisms significantly different (P < 0.05) for the date specified based on the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. SF = sand filter. RSF = recirculating sand filter. 724 J. L•NVIRON. - . ' 6 . • F PHAGE BURIED ' 5 ■ • C. PERFRINGENS. BURIED O • F. COUFORU: BURIED 0 Z ■ • • ENTEROCOCO. BURIED F PHAGE: RSF U G ■ • C. PERFRINGENS: RSF W 3 o F. COUFORU. RSF O o ENTEROCOCCI. RSF O • O (, 2 O o AA g a t 1 c 0 t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 pH ' Fg. J. Reductions of microbial indicators vs. cMuent pH in buried and recirculating (RSF) sand filters. from incorporation into the microbial biomass and or- On the cold season sampling dates, the fecal coliform ' ganic matter that develops within the filters (Pell et levels in both the recirculating and buried sand filters al., 1990). Gold and Loomis (1989) assessed total P exceeded the Rhode Island drinking water standard removals of the buried and recirculating filters during (RIDEM, 1990), while the USEPA (1986) enterococci ' the 1st yr of tilter operation at the Univ. of Rhode guidelines for recreational waters were achieved only Island field laboratory. In this earlier study, 'the pro- with buried filters. portion of P removed from the wastestream was sig- Increased reductions in fecal coliform, enterococci ' nificantly higher (P < 0.01) than the long-term rates and F phage levels were associated with lower effluent reported to Table 2, with removals averaging 75% for pH for both sand filter treatments (Fig. 3). Reddy ct the RSF's and 24% for the buried filters during the al. (1981) and Reneau et al. (1989) observed that an 1st yr of operation. acidic environment and warm temperatures can en- hance the reduction of bacterial indicators, such as Microbial Indicators fecal colifonms and enterococci. Acidic conditions may also have enhanced removal of the F phage, since low Both types of sand filters substantially reduced the pH has been found to be an important factor in ad- numbers of the microbial indicators in septic tank ef- sorption of viruses to the soil matrix (Bitton, 1980; fluent on all sampling dates (Table 3). The reductions Burge and Enkiri, 1978; Bitton et al., 1976). Because in the enterococci, fecal coliform and F phage levels low pH was always associated with high transforma- ' with both filter types generally were much greater dur tions of TKN in both sand filter designs, low pH sug- ing the summer than the winter sampling, resulting in gests elevated activity by aerobic microorganisms. summer effluent levels approaching the sensitivity of Biodegradation within the aerobic microbial ecosys- ' the assays. The reductions in the C. perfringens levels tems of the filters could have contributed to the mi- were less than those for the other indicators, but this crobial attenuation observed at low pH (Reneau et al.. was not unexpected since C. perfringens produces a 1989). Since low effluent pH occurred for longer pe- resistant cndospore. During summer sampling, mean riods in the buried sand filters than in the RSF's, the ' concentrations of fecal coliforms in effluent from both buried sand filters may be expected to generate more fitters approached drinking water standards (RIDEM, consistent removal of microbial indicators throughout 1990), and the concentrations of enterococci in both the year. In addition, the buried sand filters had finer. ' effluents were well below the USEPA guidelines for more poorly sorted media than the RSFs and should marine recreational waters (USEPA, 1986). The marked have had a higher capacity for removing organisms reductions in the F phage levels were of particular by physical -straining or filtration (Hagedorn et al., ' interest. since this virus. like the Norwalk virus. is 1981). extremely resistant to wastewater chlorination (Kes- wick ct al., 1985). The reductions in the fecal coliform and enterococci ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ' levels were significantly greater with the buried sand This research was partially sponsored by NOAA Office filters than with the RSFs on all the sampling dates of Sea Grant. U.S. Department of Commerce under Grant during the cold season. Significant differences be- no. NA85-AADSG094. The U.S. Government is author- ' twcen the two types of filters for C. perfringcns and ized to produce and distribute reprints for governmental the l: phage were observed on only one of the three purposes notwithstanding any copyright notatttm.that may cold weather sampling dates. when the pH in the ef- appear hereon. Contribution no. 2778 of the Rhode Island `lucraS ;rom the �Uricd filters reached a mean of 3.9. Agricultural Experiment Station. The use of patented in- COLD ET AL: WASTEWATER RENUVAIIUN iN bAivu rlLI=Q drains in this studv does not constitute or imply an endorse- sewage disposal. p. 1-5.In J.A. Ross(ed.)Small Flows. Vol. ment.bv the authors. 5. no. 2. National Small Flows Clearinghouse. West Virginia Univ.. Morgantown, WV. ' Laak. R:. M.A.Parese,and R. Costello. 1981. Denitrificuion of REFERENCES blackwater with greywater. 1. Environ. Eng. Div. (ASCE•). Anderson. D.L. R.L. Siegrist and R.J. Otis. 1985. Technology 107:581-590. assessment of intermittent sand filters. USEPA-Municipal En- Lamb. B.E.,A.J. Gold.-G.W. Loomis.and C.G. McKiel. 1987. viron. Res. Lab. Cincinnati. OH. Evaluation of nitrogen removal systems for on-site sewage dis- Alpkem Corporation. 1986.Operator's manual and methodologies pawl. P. 151-160. In J.R. Harris et al. (ed.) Proc. On-Site for the RFA-3(X). Alpkem Corp.. Clackamas. OR. Wastewater Treatment Symp.,Chicago 14-I5 December.ASAE. Bhatiacharyya. G.K.. and R.A. Johnson. 1977. Statistical con- St. Joseph. MI. cepts and methods. John Wiley& Sons..New York. Lamb. B.L. mo Gold. G.W. Loomis and C.G. Meech.cl. sting ' Bisson. J.W., and V.J. Cabelli. 1979. Membrane filter enumer- Nitrogen removal for on-site sewage disposal:33: A recirculating ation method for Clostridium perfiingetrs. Appl. Environ. Mi- sand filC-E..a tank design. Trans. . Man al of biological etobiol. 37.55�i6. _ Lambert, C.E..and C.A. Oviatt. 1986. Manual of biological and geochemical techniques in coastal areas. MERL Series Bitton. G. 1980. Introduction to environmental virology. John Rep. Wiley & Sons. New York. no. 1. Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston. RI. ' Bitton. G.. N. Masterson, and G.E. Gifford. 1976. Effect of a Levin. M.A., J.R. Fischer, and V.I. Cabelli. 1975. Membrane secondary treated effluent on the movement of viruses through filter technique for enumeration of enceracocci in marine wavers. a cypress dome soil. J. Environ. Oual.5:370-375. Appl. Microbial. 30:66-71. Bower, C.E., and T, Holm•Haesen, 1980, A salicyiate-hypo- Loudon, T.L. D.B. Thompson, and LE. Reese. . 33 Cold ' 3-342. chlorite method for determining ammonia in seawater. Can.J. climate performance of recirculating sand filters. p. 33atment Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37.794-798. In C.E. Beer et al. (ed.) Proc. On-Site Waste Water Treatment Burge. W.D..and N.K.Enkiri. 1978.Adsorption kinetics of bac- Symp., New Orleans. LA. 10-11 Dec. 1984. ASAE. St. Jo- tertophage cbX-174 on soil. J. Environ. Dual. 7:536-541. seph. MI. Cabelli. V.J. 1983. Health effects criteria for marine recreational Otis, RJ.. W.C. Boyle. and D.K. Sauer. 1975. The performance ' waters. EPA 600/1.80-031. Health Effects Res. Lab. USEPA, of household wastewater treatment units under field conditions. Cincinnati. OH. p 191-201.In J.W.D. Robbins et al. (ed.) Proc. Home Sewage Cabelli. VJ..F.T.Breunski,and D.Pederson. 1982.Inaccuracy• Disposal Symp.. Chicago. 9-10 Dec. 1974. ASAE. St. Joseph, of the preincubadon modified mFc method for estimating fecal MI. ' coliform densities in marine waters.1. Water Pollut. Control. Pell, M.. and F. Nyberg. 1989a. Infiltration of wastewater in a Fed. 54.1237-1240. newly started pilot sand-filter system: 1. Reduction of organic Cabelli. VJ.,A.P.Dufour,LJ.McCabe.and M.A.Levin. 19831. matter and phosphorus.1. Environ. Oual. 18:451-457. A marine recreational water quality criterion consistent with Pell. M.. and F. Nyberg. 1989b. Infiltration of wastewater in a indicator concepts and risk analysis. 1. Water Pollut. Control . newly started pilot sand-filter system: III..Transformation of ' Fed. 55:1306-1314. nitrogen. J. Environ. Oual. 18:463-367. Cogger. C.G. 1989. On-site septic systems: The risk of ground- Pell. M.,F. Nyberg,and Hans Ljunggren. 1990. Microbial num- water contamination.1. Environ. Health 51.12-16. bets and activity during infiltration of septic tank effluent in a Debartoiomeis. 1, 1988. The enumeration of F-specific bacteria- subsurface sand filter. Water Res. 24:1347-1354. ' phages from environmental waters. Ph.D. disc. University of Piluk. RJ., and OJ. Hao. 1989. Evaluation of on-site waste Rhode Island. Kingston. (Dins. Abstr. 8903059). disposal system for nitrogen reduction. J. Environ. Eng. Div. Dufour, A.P. 1980. A rwenry-four hour membrane filter proce- (ASCE). 115:725-740. dote for enumerating enterococei. p. ZOS. In R.A. Finkelstein Reddy, K.R., R.Khaleel,and M.R. Overrash. 1981. Behavior and et al. (ed.) Ann. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbial., Miami Beach, treated with microbial pathogens and indicator organisms in soils ' FL Am. Soc. Microbial.. Washington, DC. nested with organic wastes.J. Environ. n. 1 9.Fate and Dufour.A.P.. E.R.Strickland and V.J.Cabelli. 1981.Membrane Reneau.R.B..C.Hagedom,and MJ.Degen. 1989.Fate and trans- filter method for enumerating Fscherichia Coll.Appl. Environ. port of biological and inorganic contaminants from on-site disposal Microbial. 41:1152-1158. . of domestic wastewater. -144. ' Eastin.E.F. 1978.Total nitrogen J. Environ. Oual. 19:135 determinations for plant material Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management. 1990. State of Rhode island water quality criteria. Dept. of Environ. containing nitrate. Anal. Biochem. 85:591-594. Management, Providence, RI. Effert..D..J. Morand, and M. Cashell. 1985. Field performance Rittman. D.F.. and W.E. Langeland. 1985. Simultaneous deni- of three on site effluent polishing units. p. 351-361. In C.E. trification with single channel oxidation ditches. J. Water Pol- Beer et at.. (ed.) Proc. On-Site Waste Water Treatment Symp.. lut. Control Fed.57.300-308. ' New Orleans,LA. 10-11 Dec. 1984. ASAE. St. Joseph, Mi. Sauer, D.K.. and W.C. Boyle. 1978. Intermittant sand filtration Gold. AJ..and G.W. Loomis. 1989. Phosphorus loadings to the- and disinfection of small wastewater flows.p. 164-174.In F.R. groundwater from suburban land rises: A preliminary analysis. Hore et al. (ed.) Proc. Home Sewage Treatment Symp., Chi- USEPA Narrangansett Bay Project, Providence. RI. a o 12-13 Dec. 1977. ASAE. St. Joseph, MI. ' Hagedorn. C.,E.L.McCoy,and T.M. Rahe..1981.The potential for groundwater contamination from septic effluents. 1. Envi- Siegrist. pme and W.C.Boyle. 1987.Wastewater-induced). 11nduced clogging . ran. Qual. 10.1-8. development.J. Environ. Eng. Div. (ASCE). 113:550-565. Hanaki. ui C. Wantawain.and S. Ohgaki. 1990. Nitrification at Soltman, 1. M. 1990. Sand filter performance. p. 271-287. In On- !ow levels of dissolved oxygen with and without organic loading R.W.Wastewater and O.ent Short g Co Proc. act e, WA.Northwest-19 '. in a suspended-growth reactor. Water Res. 24:297-302. Site Wastewater Treatment Short Course. Seattle, WA. 18-19 Haug. R.T.. and P.C. McCarty. 19M Nitrification with sub- Sept. 1989. Univ. of Washington. Seattle. WA. merged filters. 1. Water Poilut. Control Fed. 44:2086-2102. Technicon industrial Systems..Method Nitrate and nitrite n water Hines, .M.. and R.E. Favreau, 1975, Recirculating sand filters: An Tcchnand seawater. Industrial Method no. 158.71 WrI•entative. ' altemative to traditional sewage absorption systems. p. 130-136. U.S. En con. Inc., Tarrytown. NY. In I.W.D. Robbins et al. (ed.) Proc. Home Sewage Disposal S. tc wastewater Protection Agency. sal s Design manual for S Chid 9�-10 Dec. 1974. ASAE.St.Joseph. Mi. onsite wastewater treatment and disposal systems. EPA Rep. �•• �• H.L. o. 62511-80-01 2. Cincinnati. OH. Keswick. B.H.. T.K. Satterwhite. P.G. Johnson. L. DuPont.' .S.Environmental Protection Agency. 1983.Methods for chemical S.L.S.L. Secor. I.A.1.A. Bitsura. G.W. Gary, and I.C.1.C. Hoff. 1985. analysis of water and wastes. EPA Rep. no. 600/4-79-021). rev. Inactivation of Norwalk vino in drinking water by chlorine. 1983• USEPA Office of Res. and Develop.. Cincinnati. OH. Appl. Environ. Microbial. 50:261-264. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986. BacteriologicalKtistiansen. R. 1981a.Sand filter trenches for purification of sep- ambient water quality criteria for marine and fresh recreational tic tank effluent: 1. The clogging mechanism and soil physical waters. PB 86-158-045. Nail. Technical Information Service, environment. 1. Environ. Oual. 10:353-357. ' Springfield. MA. Ktistiansen. R. 1981b. Sand filter trenches for purification of septic tank effluent: 11. The fate of nitrogen.1. Fstviron. Qual. Wild, H.E.. C.N. Sawyer. and T.C. McMahon. 1971. Factors 10.358-361. affecting nitrification kinetics. I. Water Pollut. Control Fed. ' L iak. R. 1982. A passive denitriftcation system for on-site sys- 43:1845-1854. toms p. 108-115.In G.D. Cole et al. (ed.) Proc. On-Site Sew- Windisch. M.A. 1990. An assessment of the nitrogen removal age Treatment Symp.. Chicago. 14-15 Dec. 1981. ASAE. St. efficiency and performance of RUCK septic systems to the New lusenh. "Al. Jersey Pinelands.New Jersev Pinelands Commission.New Lis- L�:,k. R. 1991. RUCK system: Denitrification process for onsite bon. NJ. r � r _ ; 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix 1. The nitrogen cycle (Pinelands Comprehensive Manage- ment Plan, 1980 ; Dudley et al. , 1989) DEFINITIONS: Total nitrogen . (TN) = total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) ' + Nitrate (NO3) + Nitrite (NO2) Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) = ammonium (NH4 ) + organic nitrogen ' 1. AMMONIFICATT_ON: The transformation of organic nitrogen to ammonia or ammonium. Ammonification can occur in the septic • tank. ' microorganisms Organic N ---------------> NE3 and/or NH4 ' 2. NITRIFICATION: The oxidation of ammonia or ammonium to nitrate. Nitrification is a two step aerobic process with nitrite as the intermediate. nitrosocaccus or nitrosomonas NE4+ + 3/202 --------------> NO2- + 2H+ + HZO nitrobacter ' N027 + 1/202 --------------> NO3- 3 . DENITRIFICATION: The reduction of nitrate to nitrogen gas, an inert gas that is abundant in the atmosphere. Denitrification requires the presence of a carbon source along with anaerobic conditions. denitrifying r bacteria NO3- + carbon source ------------> N2 gas + H2O + CO2 + ce?=ula: materia 46 �FfHE Town of Barnstable sax�srnsi.E. 16 9. ,. Board of Health ' lFp�Y A 367 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Office: 508-790-6265 Susan G.Rask,R.S. ` FAX: 508-790-6304 Brian R.Grady,R.S.. Ralph A.Murphy,M.D. 3 Decision of the Board of Health Regarding g ding Lots 1 Through 14 and Lots 16 Through 25 Falling Leaf Lane, Osterville, Shown on Subdivision Plan dated February.11, 1984, revised April 23, 1984 and Identified as Parcels 3.001 Through 3.014 on Assessor's Map 144, and Parcels 3.016 Through 3.025 on Assessor's Map 144. . 4 PROCEDURAL HISTORY On November 18, 1996, the Board of Health agent, Thomas McKean, R.S., C.H.O., received twenty-four (24) disposal system permit applications along with two checks totaling $2,400.00 from Peter Sullivan, P.E., of Baxter and Nye Incorporated, who was representing O.R.E: Associates Incorporated and Osterville Highlands Trust pertaining to proposed construction along Falling Leaf Lane, Osterville. The lots are located off of Acorn Drive, Osterville Massachusetts, and are identified as parcels 3.001 through parcels 3.014 on Assessors Map 144, and parcels 3.016 through 3.025 on Assessor's.Map 144.' The disposal system construction applications indicated that parcels 2, 4,'6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16',, 18, 20, 22, and 24 (all the even numbered lots) were owned by Osterville Highlands Trust. The remaining applications • _ C Y indicated that parcels 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, 23, and 25 (all the odd numbered lots) were owned by O.R.E. Associates. On or about November 21, 1996, Mr. McKean disapproved all twenty-four disposal construction permit applications due to the fact that the plans lacked maximum feasible compliance with the State Environmental Code, Title 5. He also returned the checks totaling $2,400.00 to Peter Sullivan, P.E., of Baxter and Nye, Incorporated, and invited him to attend a Board of Health hearing scheduled on Tuesday December 17, 1996 in order to'.,provide Mr. Sullivan the opportunity show why he, and the owners of the parcels, believed it would be s on these 24 lots which would meet the feasible to construct septic system the,provisions of Title 5,p the State Environmental Code. During the first hearing which was held on December 17, 1996, the applicant requested a . continuance. Then the Board members voted to continue this matter to the February 4, 1997 p - ublic meeting. On February 4, 1997, the applicant again requested a continuance; then the. Board members voted to continue this matter to the March 4, 1997 public meeting. Continuation hearings were also held on the following dates during 1997: June 17th, July 1st, and August 19th. Many documents were submitted into the record by both the applicant(s) and the Board of Health. The Board members rendered a decision on September 3, 1997 during a special public paring. 2 Gi FINDINGS OF THE BOARD OF HEALTH After discussion and based upon the evidence submitted, the Board of Health made the A w following findings: I. All 25 lots in the subdivision fall within a DEP approved Zone 11,of a public water supply: the Centerville-Osterville-Marstons Mills Water district wells CO# 10, CO AR#3,4, and CO MC#2. The Zone II for these wells was approved by DEP May 3, 1994. Further, these wells are showing r nitrate levels in the range of 1-3 mg/L; these levels clearly exceed background nitrate levels (generally <0.5 mg/L) and are indicative that nitrogen from human sources is reaching these wells. Septic systems are known to be the largest source of nitrogen to groundwater on Cape Cod. 2. All lots in the subdivision•are within a DEP-defined nitrogen sensitive area as defined in 310 CMR 15.215(1). .3. Further, the majority of lots in the subdivision (lots 1-10 and 16-25) fall within the town of Barnstable defined WP zone, the five year time of travel contribution zone to a public water supply. 4. Septic system effluent is a known source of nitrate and other possible contaminants to the public water supply. 5. Increasing density of housing is associated with increased levels of nitrate and other contaminants in groundwater: 6. In recognition of 4 and 5 above, DEP has determined per 310 CMR 15.214(I), that no system serving.new construction in a nitrogen sensitive area designated in 310 CMR 15.215 shall 3' be designed to receive or shall receive more than 440 gallons of design flow per day per acre except as set forth at 310 CMR 15.216 (aggregate flows) or 15.217 (enhanced nitrogen removal). 7. All lots in the subdivision are less than an acre in size. Further, all lots, except lots 23 and 21, are less than one-half acre (20,000 sf). Under the nitrogen loading requirements of 310 CMR 15.214, the half-acre lots would be'entitled to a 220 design flow, the lots less than one-half acre would be entitled to a 110 gpd design flow. 8. Under the Title 5 transition rules, 310 CMR 15.005, the owner of a lot on which construction of a septic system in full compliance with,310 CMR 15.000 is not feasible.is entitled to construct a system with a cumulative design flow of up to 330 gpd provided that the system is constructed in compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 to the maximum extent feasible as determined by the local approving authority pursuant to 310 CMR x15.404 and 15.405. 9. 310 CMR 15.404 (maximum feasible compliance) states that a non-conforming system may be brought into compliance through the installation of an alternative system (i.e. a nitrogen removal system with associated design flow.credit may be used to bring a system into compliance with the requirements of 310 CMR 15.214). 10. The Board is in,receipt of a letter from DEP to William Nye (one of the applicants)dated February 4, 1997 stating that "the department'interprets compliance with the requirements of 310 CM,R 15.005 (3)(a) through (c) to require, pursuant to 310 CMR 15.005(c), a'considered assessment by the proponent of approved nitrogen removal technologies when site limitations prevent,attainment of the 440 gallon per acre design flow standard set for new construction under 310 CMR 15.215(1)..." 4 15. The applicant may choose in the future to present to this board an aggregate nitrogen loading which complies with 310 CMR 15.216; this plan, if approved by the board, will negate the restrictions in 14 above. ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD OF HEALTH - Based upon the Board's unanimous approval of the proposed findings, the Board of Health voted to take,the following action regarding the pending twenty-four applications for disposal, system construction permits submitted by the applicants, Osterville Highland Trust, John Alger, Trustee and ORE Associates, Inc.: 4 k A) Disposal System Construction Permits shall issue to ORE Associates, Inc. for lots 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, 25 and to Osterville Highland Trust, John Alger, Trustee for lots 2, 4, 6, t 8, 10, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, as designed, said issuance subject to compliance with the following . conditions: 1. All dwellings shall be limited to 2 bedrooms unless the system(s) is modified to include enhanced nutrient removal as approved by the Board of Health in which case a dwelling served by a modified system may be permitted to have not more than 3 bedrooms. 2. Each plan shall be modified by the applicants to include a notation containing the full text of the language recited in paragraph (A)(1) above. 3. Deed restrictions, approved as to form by the Town Attorney, limiting the use of the ellings to two bedrooms on each of the above-referenced lots shall be recorded at the` stable Registry of Deeds. A copy of the recorded deed restriction for the'particular lot for 1 6 I which a Disposal System Construction Permit is sought shall be provided to the Barnstable Board of Health prior to the issuance of a Disposal System Construction Permit. (B) Disposal System Construction"Permits shall issue to ORE Associates, Inc. for lots I and 23 and to Osterville Highland Trust, John Alger, Trustee for lots 12 and 22, as designed, subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. All dwellings shall be limited to not more than 3 bedrooms and said system(s) must be modified to include enhanced nutrient removal as approved by the Board of Health. 2. Each plan shall be modified by the. applicants to include a notation containing the full text of the language recited in paragraph (13)(1) above. (C) No permit shall issue for lot 15 which has been designated, pursuant to the initial subdivision approval by the Planning Board, as a lot reserved for drainage. (D) The issuance of the permits, as restricted, shall not prejudice or otherwise limit the right of both applicants, jointly or severally, to file with the Board of Health and the DEP a plan pursuant to the provisions of 310 CMR 15.216(2), nor shall the mere filing of such a plan obligate the Board of Health to approve same.. VOTE: IN FAVOR OF DECISION : RASK, GRADY, MURPHY OPPOSED: NONE ` Dated: October 7, 1997 y Susan Rask, Chair ` Barnstable Board of Health . 4" PVC ROOF VENT NOTE: DESIGN FLOW = 330 GALLONS/DAY 2" LAYER OF 1/8" „ TO 1/2" STONE 4 PERFORATED PVC PIPE 100.00' f TEE VENT 2 0' 3/4" TO 1 1/2" 4" VENT WASHED STONE PROPOSE LOT 2 TOP OF FOUNDATION D HOUSE TO TO HOUSE COVER TO GRADE COVER TO GRADE FINISH GRADE OVER THE \ \,\\.\\r�\r� r� r� r� r\ r\r\r\r\/\/\ r,/�,/�,/i,/i, /r. /.. /., /� /r, /�./�./�. /✓i� i\ /\/\. \.\\. SAS = 45 �--4.0'---►� --► \.\\r\ /\ i,//� /�.//\ /, s= 0.02 SLOPE SLOPE \ �\ r\\r, 3� �� \ r./ LEACHING TRENCH CROSS SECTION 1000 GALLON O 6 MAXIMUM COVER RUCK SAND (BY BAXTER & NYE, INC.) N BLACKWATER WITHOUT VENTING NOT TO SCALE co SEPTIC TANK o FILTER 2' Dist. box 1 d� 11 3' s= 0.01 level = 0.01 SOIL ABSORBTION SYSTEM DESIGNED BY BAXTER & NYE, INC. II p H—10 p II 1000 GALLON W O W LO rn GRAYWATER d. M ca co O TEST HOLE /NFORMAT/ON BY z z a N SEPTIC TANK N N N N N BAXTER & NYE, INC. - _ z z z •• d �t d BOTTOM ELEV. = 40.40 PERCOLA T/ON RA TE <' 5 M/NIINCH w w » PROFILE I I a aH-2 0 n n u u I I NO GROUND WA TER ENCOUNTERED 0 0 3 6 CRUSHED COMPACTED STONE 0 Not to Scale 8 SOIL LOG w o u7 m z z z z z z z DEPTH SOILS ELEV. BOTTOM OF TEST HOLE = 32.0 0 45.0 EXISTING DETERMINED BY OTHERS 6 CRUSHED COMPACTED STONE FOUNDATION LOAMY � SAND 9'-0" 3.0' 42.0 RUCK FILTER 8'-6" II' W/0EX ; 0 14'LONG PLAN REFERENCE: ALL ACCESS MANHOLE COVERS FOR(` 2-20' Diameter Access Holes �— :H o CERTIFIED PLOT PLAN BY x SEPTIC TANK, DISTRIBUTION BOX, 2-20".Diameter Access Holes A MEDIUM N 6' 6' BAXTER & NYE, INC. '�' AND LEACHING STRUCTURE SET MORE t' o rP SCALE: 1" = 40' PROPOSED HOUSE THAN 6 BELOW FINISHED GRADE, SAND 1000 GALLON I PLAN DATE: 5/24/98 TOP OF FOUNDATION = 50.50 COVER TO GRADE INLET OUTLET SHALL BE RAISED TO WITHIN 6 OF \ BLACKWATER 1000 GALLON FINISHED GRADE. INLET OUTLET LOT 2 FALLING LEAF LANE a J SEPTIC TANK GREYWA TER 10' _ SEPTIC TANK OSTERVILLE, MA. ./ 13 3 .0 M/N. - - - - - -- - - -- - - 6 APPLICANT: McSHANE CONSTRUCTION Co. s= 0.154 RESERVE AREA L ,� —.-;•.• �-� , D/STR/BUT10J 80X ..> !77:• 1 LEACH/NG TRENCH. 14 60'LONG, 4' W/DE SURFACE VENT LOCATION 1000 GALLON FRAME & COVER "` GREYWATER STEEL REINFORCED PRECAST CONCRETE OVER "T'S" WHERE REQUIRED. Y a FRAME & COVER M/N. AND 2'DEEP (SEE DETAIL) TO BE DETERMINED /N THE FIELD OVER "T'S" WHERE REQUIRED. rn � SEPTIC TANK � PLAN VIEW STEEL REINFORCED PRECAST CONCRETE 100.00' - .: PLAN VIEW II II H—2 0 II PRECAST CONCRETE 6„ REMOVABLE COVERS 6" TANK RISER WHERE PRECAST CONCRETE REQUIRED �•�— REMOVABLE COVERS 3" TANK RISER WHERE FAL L/NG L LEAF LANE 3„ r REQUIRED 4 Z Z Z ULI • -77771, 3" min. clearance required " INLET "T"` 4" ' PLAN VIEW OF RUCK SYSTEM LAYOUT - - - INLET �' 13 �' 3°`min. clearance required » ��2" min. inlet to outlet 6 min. 13 INLET—"Tr": OUTLET INLET $ 2" min. inlet to outlet 6" min. UJ 6" CRUSHED COMPACTED STONE 10" min. �� OUTLET ' 1 " = 2 0' 14 min. Q A 10" min. 14" min. c 0. fl R s c c RE ° TUF—TITE =E I o I G R E YWA TE R PROFILE 1 GAS BAFFLE l 3 R TUF-ATE R J a � pj 2 GAS BAFFLE c'j Not to Scale •y � J J 17' 3- 5'-3-.. —a.l 8'-0" ; "PERMALON PLY 210 r °D CONTAINMENT LINER �8'-0" 4'-t " OR APPROVED EQUAL CROSS—SECTION END—SECTION _ AND—SECTION �. Design Criteria TYPICAL 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK �H-20 LOADINGS TYPICAL 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK (H-10 LOADING PERF. 2 PVC PIPE (VENTS) __________________________________________________------ NOT TO SCALE --- -� �------ NOT TO SCALE Number of bedrooms: 3 Equivalent to 330 gal.'s/day Garbage disposal unit: NO PERF. 4" PVC PIPE (DISTRIBUTION) i i Leaching area — capacity required: 330 gal.'s/day ALL OUTLET PIPES FROM THE INSTALL TUFTITE SPEED LEVELERS DISTRIBUTION BOX SHALL BE ON ALL OUTLET PIPES 4" PVC PIPE a- Side area proposed: 240 sq. ft. 16.5 I I Bottom area proposed: 240 sq. ft.7 SET LEVEL FOR AT LEAST 2 FT. CONCRETE COVER PERF. 4 PVC PIPE (COLLECTION)-•� I I -- - -------------------------------------------- ------- ---- - - Total area proposed: 480 sq. ft. 11' I ' 5 - 5" OUTLET --��------------------------------------------- -------, , ---- - - Proposed leaching capacity: 355 gal. s/day ;' `.\ KNOCKOUTS Water supply: Town ; II PITCH II i , » Precast concrete units: H-10 & H-20 loading design , , 15.5 r-� -� INLET 19.5 A i i ►�- I I A i OUTLET NOTICE n PERF. 4" PVC PIPE (DISTRIBUTION)-,, „ Unless and until such time as the original (red) stamp of the 9 11.25" responsible Professional Engineer appears on this plan (A) no person or persons, including any municipal or other • I i - • , , -- , . �' i i public officials, may rely upon the information contained herein; and 1 L—___-- J L_—__-- 20" (8) this plan remains the property of Innovative RUCK Systems, Inc. 2 i------ ------___----------------------------------- 1.75" PERF. 2" PVC PIPE (VENTS) � PLAN SECTION CROSS- SECTION. INSECT SCREEN THE SIDES OF THE FILTER MAY BE SLOPED. THE REQUIRED AREA OF THE FILTER SHALL BE THE MIDDLE LAYER OF THE INDRAINS. THE CONTAINMENT LINER SHALL BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING A PH OF 3.0 H DISTRIBUTION THE RUCK DESIGN IS SUBJECT TO A PATENT P A m FINISH T GRADE 3' ABOVE � HOLE D S 6 U TI O N BOX X AND REMAINS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY 4" DIA. PVC PIPE OF INNOVATIVE RUCK SYSTEMS, INC. 4" DIA. VENT PIPE TO BE VENTED BACK (VENT) NOT TO SCALE COPYING OR INFRINGEMENT OF TO THE FACILITY AND UP THROUGH ROOF TO THIS DESIGN IS PROHIBITED. SAME ELEVATION AS PLUMBING VENT SLOPE FILTER CLOTH- TYPAR 3401 AS MANUFACTURED BY LINO GEOTEXTILE 18' OVERLAP BETWEEN LINER DIVISION OR APPROVED EQUAL 18 OVERLAP BETWEEN LINER 4" VENT TO FACILITY GENERAL NOTES AND FILTER CLOTH AND FILTER CLOTH o 0 0 0 o p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p p o 6' STONE— o 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 1) No change to this system shall be made unless DATE DESCRIPTIONJDrawn�hecked " 7" INDRAINS I approved in writing by Innovative RUCK Systems, Inc. R E V I S I O N S I 7 INDRAINS i Subject inspection during ,. . ...... ... ,. by „ ,. . . , .,. 5 SAND .. I— u c o In c Ion url construction r I� o s u c on e G. . PERMALON PLY 210 .. : ... ... .. . .. ...... .. . .. . . .. , , <• I .l;= _ CONTAINMENT LINER > 2" sroNE_ ' • ` ,; a.., .._ Board Of Health and Innovative RUCK Systems, Inc OR APPROVED EQUAL " . I L .. 7" INDRAINS , I. z 7 INDRAINS I I » 3) Heavy construction equipment shall not travel A� Q 4 - 4 5 SAND OF PROPOSED RUCK SYSTEM N over disposal system duringor after construction. 0 2~ STONE- I 4 Disposal system to be constructed in accordance PREPARED FOR 7.• INDRAINS ,••, .• I I � 7 INDRAINS p Y �. Mc Co. -. .•, .. ,... .. .;,.._- . .,.• ,.::.•.. .-,•' .::::-.ht:.;.,;,.•,• :,' :........':: � .. with Title 5 of the State Environmental Code ::_ > a. .. ' '... 5 SAND: , , .. .-'..;''. ,,:�. -S•A�I�.,;:,. • t.. "a,'�`:.L` :::•"..'" :::';. -. . . . .; ,, .r �. ..' .> :,.: .> :: _ _ - ,._ : , :. :. ..,... . ., . . . •:,.,. ,.:: '. .:..:: . .......:...: . . :, ..�..:: •`� ) on he site FOR LOT 2, FALLING LEAF LANE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6' STONE 5 A copy of these plans must be kept t t : . during the time of construction. ° 2- IN I CH" )ITC H., I A co of these plans must be furnished to the OSTERVILLE MA 6 ARNSTA L 6 B E copy P s, contractor constructing the disposal system. ��_ur 4" PVC PIPE 7) Before backfilling, the contractor shall notify SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE' JULY 31 , 1998 ti "N 4_ 4" LAYER OF COMPACTED (DRAIN) Innovative RUCKS stems Inc., or the Board of Health & r ,W FINE SAND 4 LAYER OF COMPACTED Y ., . 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE NOTE: DUE TO VARYING METHODS FINE SAND SECTION B-8 PROVIDE 1-1/4" PITCH FROM Agent to inspect the system as constructed. Innovative RUCK Systems, Inc. OF INSTALLING THE LINER, THE CONTRACTOR EDGE TO CENTER. i a SHALL FURNISH SHOP DRAWINGS DESCRIBING 200 main street SECTION A-A THE INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL falmouth, ma. 02540 R K� AN FILTER DRAWN: TMS CHECKED: ' UC SAND LTE 10I NOT TO SCALE 98315.DWG LIC. NO.: 0201188315 DWG. NO.: 70-1-28 SHEET 1 OF 1