Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0150 WHEELER ROAD - Health �l 150 Wheeler R6ad Marstons.M.ills — A = i 03 — 109 - 002 �I i BENNET I' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS,ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS,GEOLOGISTS,ENGINEERS 1573 Main Street,P.O.Box 1743 (508)896-1706 Brewster,MA 02631 fax(508)896-5109 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: DATE: JOB NUMBER: Mr.Bob Murphy,Case Officer MA DEP(SERO) 10/16/2012 BEA12-10441 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup 20 Riverside Drive REGARDING: Lakeville,MA 02347 RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE COMPLETION STATEMENT with CLASS A-2 RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME SHIPPING METHOD: RTN 2-24112 Regular Mail ❑ Pick Up ❑ Priority Mail ❑ Hand Deliver ❑ Express Mail ❑ Other upload ❑X 0 O N Certified Mail ❑ Green Card/RR ❑ � C Z C.� 7 COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION =° cm 1 10/9/12 Release Abatement Measure Completion(RAMC)Statement -o with Class A-2 Response Action Outcome(RAO) Wheeler Re3idence,RTN 4-24112 150 Wheeler Road,Marstons Mills rn For review and comment: ❑ For approval: ❑ As requested: ❑ For your use: ❑ REMARKS: cc: Rick and Betty Ann Wheeler-Property Owner(report on CD) Stuart W.Rapp,Esquire-Attorney for Mr.Wheeler(report on CD) Doug Bean-Property Caretaker(report on CD) Cosmo Gallinaro,LSP,Consultant to.Insurer-CommonSense Environmental(report on CD) Tom McKean,Director-Barnstable Health Department(narrative,title page and site plan only) Cynthia Martin-Barnstable Health Department(narrative,title page and site plan only) Thomas K.Lynch-Barnstable Town Administrator(narrative,title page and site plan only) Martin MacNeely,Fire Prevention O;icer-COMM Fire Department(narrative,title page and site plan only) FROM: DCB,JTW If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once f -uENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS 6 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 6 GEOLOGISTS 6 ENGINEERS 1573 Main Street-P.O. Box 1743, Brewster, MA 02631 6 508-896-1706 6 Fax 508-896-5109 www.bennett-ea.com BEA12-10441 October 9, 2012 Mr. Bob Murphy, Case Officer MA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office (SERO) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 RE: RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE COMPLETION STATEMENT with CLASS A-2 RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME Wheeler Residence, RTN 4-24112 150 Wheeler Road [Assessor's Map 103, Parcel 1098-2] —Marstons Mills, MA 02648 Dear Mr. Murphy, BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL.ASSOCIATES, INC. (BEA)has prepared the following Release Abatement. Measure. Completion Statement with Class A-2 Response Action Outcome (RAMC/RAO) as a summary of remedial response actions, environmental monitoring and potential exposure risk assessment to identified human and environmental receptors as further to the filing of the Release Abatement Measure Plan (RAMP) on August 20, 2012. The report narrative and transmittal:forms are accompanied by supporting documentation as appendices to set forth the technical rationale and scientific justification for the LSP Opinions rendered as supporting a finding of No Significant Risk for project closure under the provisions of the MA Contingency Plan(MCP) in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0000.. Formal Release Notification for the 120-Day Reportable Condition was previously filed on August 6, 2012, subsequent to the realization that the ongoing Limited Removal Action would not be appropriate to investigate potential groundwater impacts and, that contrary to the original Conceptual Site Model (CSM), a significantly larger volume of oil had been released than originally reported involving the removal of more than 100 yards of significantly impacted soils. As such, Release Tracking Number(RTN)4-24112 was secured towards the filing of a RAMP to complete remedial response actions associated with soil impacts identified and evaluate the potential threat of groundwater impacts as associated with the realization of a 150+ gallon release of fuel oil from a 330 gallon aboveground storage tank(AST) over an estimated 11 month period (August 2011 to June 2012). Information from the original RAM Plan (RAMP) is summarized herein to orient the reviewer to the timeline and sequence of prior response actions. The reviewer may wish to consider these earlier documents for details of prior Site characterization, exposure risk 1 EMERGENCY SPILL RESPONSE & WASTE SITE CLEANUP 6 SITE ASSESSMENT 6 PERMITTING 0 SEPTIC DESIGN&INSPECTION WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT,OPERATION&MAINTENANCE 6 WASTEWATER TREATMENT,OPERATION&MAINTENANCE OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 2 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 evaluation and Remedial Response activities. Original work under the LRA, wherein a minor loss of fuel oil was reported, resulted in the removal of some 50 tons of significantly impacted soils. Remedial Response Actions performed under the RAMP resulted in the removal of an additional 73.36 tons (49 cubic yards) of contaminated soils from the source area as totaling some 86 yards of significantly impacted soils having been removed from a 23' x 12' x 13' (D) area underlying the former tank adjacent to the detached garage. As a contingency for additional treatment, some 60 lbs. of the Regenox `Part A' (part 1 of 2) oxidizing agent was applied in the dry powder form to the bottom of hole area to facilitate any additional treatment of residual petroleum hydrocarbons if required, pending receipt of analytical data. Laboratory analysis of end point soils reported the removal of all significantly impacted soils to concentrations below applicable standards, wherein an Exposure Point Concentration (EPC) was calculated as an arithmetic average of site data under the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0926 as less than the most stringent S-1/GW-1 Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards. This soil data, in addition to the two rounds of representative groundwater sampling of monitoring wells immediately down gradient and adjacent to the area of soil removal reporting VPH/EPH and target anal es as non- detect g Yt detect (ND), are used to support a finding of No Significant Risk in support of the Class A-2, Response Action Outcome for project closure. This work has been conducted under direct LSP oversight in a manner consistent with the MCP Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS) pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0191 and the QA/QC policies of BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. The facts and statements herein are, to the best of our knowledge, a true and accurate representation of the Site activities, remedial response actions and environmental conditions associated with the project and LSP Opinions acknowledged by the certification on the attached BWSC-104 and BWSC-106 Transmittal Forms as based on the current regulations, policies and LSP standard of practice at the time of reporting. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS [Refer to Appendix A] The subject property at 150 Wheeler Road is noted on Barnstable Assessor's Map 103 as Parcel 109002 and is located approximately 1,500' southeast of the intersection of Wheeler Road and Race Lane [Refer to Figure 1] in the Barnstable Village of Marstons Mills. The UTM coordinates for the Site are Northing 4615038m and Easting 382920m. The property contains approximately 7.8 acres of land area and is developed by a one-story residential dwelling and a free-standing detached garage. The majority of land at the subject property, including the area of release, is upland, with a low-lying area toward Middle Pond at the southwestern property line. The surrounding area is moderately developed and in similar use as characterized by residential properties. Access to the subject property and area of release, as along the exterior wall of the on-site garage, is unrestricted with high frequency/low intensity of use and children potentially present. The dwelling occupants and visitors to the property are identified as the primary potential human receptors to potential inhalation and dermal contact exposures. Groundwater was encountered at 50-55' below grade surface. Regional groundwater contours indicate a south-southeasterly flow direction toward East Bay and Centerville Harbor OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 3 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 [Refer to Figure 2]. Site-specific groundwater contours, however, have established a southwesterly local flow direction toward the abutting Middle Pond. Based on the qualified local groundwater flow, Middle Pond represents the primary potential environmental receptor in consideration of Method 1 — Risk Characterization for potentially receiving impacted groundwater. The subject property is not located within the Zone II Protective Radius of a Public Water Supply (PWS), nor is it located within the Zone A protective radius of any surface water reservoir. The Site is shown as a medium-yield potentially productive aquifer as well as a part of the Sole Source Aquifer designated by the EPA for all of Cape Cod east of the canal. There are four properties within 500-feet of the Site which are serviced by potable wells. However these properties are up gradient and cross-gradient to the Site, based on site-specific groundwater flow direction. The Site and remaining properties within 500-feet of the Site are serviced by the Centerville-Osterville-Marstons Mills (COMM) water district. As such, the Site is defined as a Current Drinking Water Source Area (CDWSA). Based on the CDWSA designation and proximity to groundwater, the RCGW-1 Reportable Concentrations are applicable per 310 CMR 40.0361, as are the GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1 Risk Characterization standards in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0974. Based on residential use and Site conditions including frequency/intensity of use and accessibility of soils, the RCS-1 Reportable Concentrations are applicable per 310 CMR 40.0362, and S-1/S-2/S-3 (GW-1/GW-3), Method 1 — Risk Characterization standards are applicable per 310 CMR 40.0975. These standards were developed in consideration of potential ingestion, inhalation, dermal contact and environmental exposures, and in review of potential leaching of contaminants to groundwater. The Site, as defined by those areas where fuel oil has been released or migrated to, is a small portion of the subject property at the rear of the detached garage containing some 1,000 SF of land area. The Site is roughly defined to the north as slightly within the rear wall of the detached garage and to the west, south and east by the respective MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 monitoring wells. BACKGROUND [Refer to Appendix B] The residence at the property was serviced by a single-wall, steel, 330-gallon aboveground storage tank (AST) off the south side of a garage located at the subject property. The vessel was located on a concrete pad. The property owner recently converted the heating system to natural gas and contacted Tank Removal Services (TRS)to remove the old tank. TRS personnel had the contents of the tank pumped on June 12, 2012, wherein 125-gallons of residual fuel oil was removed by Autobody. Solvent Recovery Corp and transported to Murphy's Waste Oil Service, Inc. in Woburn, MA. During the pumping of the tank, TRS personnel observed petroleum staining on the concrete pad beneath the AST as well as petroleum staining on the walls of the garage building. TRS personnel informed the homeowner that a release of oil may have occurred and that the release should be investigated. The COMM Fire-Department and Barnstable Health Department were subsequently notified. BEA was subsequently contacted and engaged by the property owner, to conduct a fuel . OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 4 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 oil release investigation in review of significant petroleum hydrocarbon impacts, risk characterization and potential liability for remedial response actions. In the review of the fuel oil delivery records, no significant volume of loss was apparent in that fuel oil delivery records provided by Riddell Oil Company/Canal Fuel did not show any fuel delivery after 8/11/11 and that calculated fuel oil use was consistent with historic use. In retrospect, it is apparent that a fuel delivery was made after 8/11/11 for the 2011-2012 winter heating season or that a slow leak had been occurring over a significant period of time. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/PRELIMINARY RESPONSE Soil BEA personnel traveled to the subject property on June 15, 2012 to review the Site conditions and circumstances of release, as well as perform environmental assessment to qualify significant petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in review of risk characterization. Upon arrival, BEA noted the subject AST as located off the rear of the garage and an area of distinct staining to surface soils. BEA conducted three hand borings (HBs) in the area of the AST with soil samples collected in 2' intervals [Refer to Site Plan]. Based on the nature of soils as being clayey with cobbles and boulders, the vertical extent of testing was limited to 3' below grade. Each of the samples was placed in a 2.50-milliliter glass jar with aluminum septum and agitated to develop organic vapors. The samples were subsequently screened by "jar headspace method" with a PID as consistent with the Interim Soils Policy (WSC-94-400). PID screening reported elevated total organic volatile (TOV) concentrations [>28 parts per million by volume (ppmv)] in all samples. BEA personnel field-preserved soil samples HB-1:0-3', HB-2:0-3' and HB-3:0-3' on ice in a cooler for MA Certified laboratory analysis of risk-based extractable petroleum hydrocarbon and target polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon(EPH/PAH) concentrations. Laboratory analysis reported fractional C9-C18 Aliphatics concentrations in each of the soil samples as greater than the RCS-1 Reportable Concentrations. As such, laboratory analytical had demonstrated significant petroleum hydrocarbon impact in more than two cubic yards of soil, triggering a 120-Day Release Notification requirement and remedial response liability. On June 19, 2012, BEA was on site to oversee the removal of the AST by Tank Removal Services (TRS) from the subject property. Following the removal of an overhang above the vessel, TRS removed the tank from the underlying concrete pad and wrapped the tank in plastic. The area of release was then covered to protect it against rainfall infiltration. Upon further consideration of the types of soils, estimated volume of release from fuel delivery records and the apparent separation to groundwater, it was determined that a Limited Removal Action (LRA) could be performed for the removal of impacted soils as could address notification and remedial liability generated under the MCP. BEA notified the COMM Fire Department and Barnstable Health Department of planned soil removal under an LRA. BEA personnel returned to the subject property on June 28, 2012 to oversee soil removal activities to be conducted by Tank Removal Services and Enright Construction. The concrete pad was broken up and impacted soils were removed to 3' below grade surface (bgs) and r OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 5 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 transported to Aggregate Industries asphalt batching facility in South Dennis under a pre- approved Bill of Lading. A representative bottom-of-hole (BOH) soil sample was collected and field screened with a PID for the presence of organic vapors. A TOV concentration of 154 ppmv was indicated in the bottom-of-hole soils and it became apparent that the extent of significant soil impact was greater than estimated. Upon the arrival of a second dump truck, excavation activities resumed as focused on the lateral extent of significant impacts. As visual inspection indicated improved conditions at the lateral extent of excavation at 6-7' bgs, representative sidewall samples were collected for field screening. Elevated PID screening results, as well as Dexsil PetroFlag soil screening (EPA SW- 846, Method 9074) results indicated persistent significant impacts at each of the sidewall areas. Representative soil samples including "worst case" sidewall SW-N: 3-8' and bottom of hole BOH@8' were forwarded to a certified laboratory for EPH with target analytes analysis. Subsequent laboratory analytical results reported fractional aromatics and C9-C18 Aliphatics, as well as 2-methylnaphthalene, as exceeding the S-1/GW-1 Method 1 — Risk Characterization standards. Mass balance computations using soil concentrations at the extent of excavation and estimated area of impacts revealed the likelihood of a release greater than 150 gallons. Based on these calculations, site conditions and the vertical extent of soil impacts, an apparent threat of significant groundwater impact was realized and the Limited Removal Action was no longer appropriate and the continuation of waste site cleanup was to proceed under an alternative regulatory vehicle as a Release Abatement Measure wherein groundwater impacts would be evaluated and more than 100 yards of contaminated soil removal could be accommodated. Groundwater To further qualify Notification and the appropriate regulatory vehicle for Site cleanup, BEA furthered environmental characterization of the subject property on July 9, 2012 with the advancement of test borings (TBs) to advance soil sampling to depth and for the installation of monitoring wells (MWs) in review of potential groundwater impacts. BEA directed Jenkins Well Drilling in the advancement of TB-1, TB-2 and TB-3 towards the installation of monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3, respectively. Test Boring TB-1 was advanced on the west side of the excavation; TB-2 to the south in a clearly down gradient location and TB-3 to the east of the excavation. Field headspace screening of soils at 23-25' below grade surface in TB-2 and 28-30' bgs and capillary fringe soils (53-55' bgs) in test boring TB-3 reported PID responses. Representative soil samples TB-2:23-25', TB-3:28-30' and TB-3:53-55' were prepared and forwarded to a certified laboratory for confirmatory EPH with target PAH analysis. The TB- 3:53-55' soil sample was also analyzed for volatile petroleum hydrocarbon (VPH) with target BTEX analyses. Laboratory analytical results subsequently reported low-level fractional EPH impacts to the TB-3:28-30' soil sample. These concentrations were well below the most restrictive S-l/GW-1 Method 1 —Risk Characterization standards. OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELERBEAI2-10441 PAGE 6 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 On July 11, 2012 the monitoring well top-of-casing elevations were surveyed to a common vertical datum in review of static water level elevations towards calculating local groundwater flow. BEA also performed a series of slug tests at monitoring well MW-1 to qualify hydraulic conductivity and characterize the aquifer in review of solute fate and transport. The Geraghty and Miller AQTESOLV program was employed to interpret the results of the slug tests wherein a hydraulic conductivity of 189.73 feet per day was computed as consistent with the clean, medium sands encountered within the upper portion of the aquifer. Based on the calculated hydraulic conductivity and the hydraulic gradient reported along the Site-specific groundwater flow vector, the groundwater velocity was reported as 2.3527 ft/day. Based on a retardation factor of 20%, the corresponding solute Time of Travel from the release area to the down gradient MW-2 and MW-3 monitoring wells was reported as 7 days and 9 days, respectively. Site-specific groundwater flow direction was calculated as southwesterly wherein monitoring well, MW-2 and MW-3 are noted as down gradient of the area of release. BEA returned to the subject property on August 3, 2012 to again record static water level measurements. The site-specific groundwater flow direction was confirmed as southwesterly, substantiating the representativeness of MW-2 and MW-3 as down gradient of the release area. The significance of these results is further discussed in the Risk Characterization and Environmental Monitoring sections of this report. BEA then developed, purged and sampled the monitoring well network in review of significant groundwater impacts. Groundwater samples were collected for EPH/PAH and VPH/BTEX laboratory analyses. Laboratory analytical results reported all EPH/VPH and target analyte concentrations in all wells as non-detect (ND), wherein the reporting limits for all contaminants of concern were less than the strictest GW-1, Method 1 Risk Characterization standards. RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE [Refer to Appendix B] Following the submittal of the RAMP, which prescribed soil removal with the installation of a passive venting system with a contingency for remedial additive application, BEA coordinated remedial response actions with the selected contractor, Global Remediation Services, Inc. On September 6, 2012, BEA directed Global Remediation Services, Inc. in the removal of an additional 73.36 tons (49 cubic yards +/-) of fuel oil contaminated soils from the qualified release area. Field screening and Dexsil testing of representative soil samples collected from the sidewalls of the excavation indicated effective contaminated soil removal from those areas. The friable nature of the soils along the release area made it difficult to advance the bottom-of-hole without undermining the foundation and endangering the integrity of the structure. Based on the condition of the sidewalls of the excavation, wherein consistent collapse threatened to undermine the foundation, BEA made a dynamic field decision to apply two buckets (601bs. powder) of Part A of the chemical oxidant Regenox to the bottom of the excavation, as a contingency for additional treatment in case endpoint samples reported significant residual impacts. To that end, BEA directed the contractor to install a 4"PVC "blank" along the base of the excavation to accommodate future sampling of the bottom-of-hole after backfill and restoration. However, no sampling ports were installed within the excavation prior to the partial backfilling OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 7 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 of the excavation with stone aggregate to stabilize the sidewalls. Endpoint sampling results were reported on September 14, 2012. Results reported all concentrations of TPH, EPH and target analytes and VPH and target BTEX compounds as below the response limits of the analyses (BRL) or below the applicable Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards including the most stringent S-1/GW-1 Standards, with one exception. The target analyte 2-Methylnapahtalene was reported in the western bottom of hole sample (BOH-W @13') at 1.23 mg/kg, above the S-1/GW-1, GW-2, GW-3 Standards of 0.7 mg/kg. The sum of laboratory analytical results associated with end-point soil samples is presented in Table 1 below, as well as within Appendix D. The significance of these results is discussed in the Risk Characterization section of this report. TAPLA.!:Endpoint Sampling Results Comparedto Applicabale Method 1 Standards With Calculated Exposure Point Concentrations(EPCs) . Wheeler Residence-150 Wheeler Road,Marston Mills,MA .. _ R. 4-24112 _ ZO.YEA ZO.E9 ppem Bp&\Y�13' s5v£OJ' l\'-A(p:)-1)• s\v-N(t\}.)-IJ• slvs(q:3.1 s56\T-1)1' S\\'S:OJ' 6\v-\v:)-I)• BDI 3' Bd.r SA\BL4\'G DATE 52013) \v 9-on -.1] 9/4/)01] I s 9/Oft 9I5rs013 013 LNS Cme<elnnm. -a) 31594011/RI LI]15940L] 0 1 1940a9 L1215940 6 L1 L]f 940W 0�03 Lf3159100 L L121594 0 R.) LIRLETPE k1<medf Rl.k Ca]...4nLWw srss4v.6 14rVQe)sawl/Q\J 9ev , Baeamele ReiNleam llya.osa,enna .. C9C1BAfiPhatiee 10W11000 300Q1000 SWW'vOW mWkp 39B fiB1 17.] BFL(<6.48) 0.T0 556 11.3 BRL(<fl53), Iii(<7.13) BRL(<].56) 12 Ct&(0.8 NIp1m100 3000/J000 50W500p 51]OW50W mp/kp 121 191 11.6 BRL(<fl 18) 1]0 219 BRL(cB.B2) BRL(<85]) BRL(<],43) BRL(c1.56) ].33 BRL(<8.67) BRL(<].55) ., .. .. .. C11C12 Ammalica mWkB 275 3)$ 9.47 BRL(<fi.10) 35] 3W BRL(<b.B2) BRL(<8.53) BRL(<7.43) BRL(<),56) 10.9 BRL(4.8]) BRL(<].55) C11Q1Amma0ce,AQmstm 100W1W0 1WWlWO 10001•vc00 mWkp 275 311 9.1] BRL(4.q0)_ 355 WJO BRL I<B 82) BRL(<fi.5J) BRL(<).43).. BRL k7S0_.,._10.3 0RL(<flfi]) BRL(- NapMlmle�re 41500 4/10W 4/.f000 m9lkP BRL(<032]7 BRL(<032B) BRL(<OQ BF3(<O.J21) B13(<p.N]) BRL(<D_352) BRL(<0.X1) BRL(<0.327) BI8(c43)2) BiB.(<0.3]B) 8t3(<p.329) Bf1(<03X) B�(<0.3JB)._ .._ ..... _ . ... .... .. ..... IJdethyltmpMlmbre 0.])5W 0.)/Sp0 D.]5fp mplkp BRL(<0327) I.. BRL(<O q) BM(<0.324) BRL(<Q31)) BRL(<0.3527 BRL(<0.311) BRL(<0.3T7) BAL IcD.3]2) 0RL(<4]]B) 8!S(<0.328) BRL(<0.3N) Bii(<0.3]B) 0.25fi5 AcenaphlMlene 1I10 1]10 1110 mWk9 BRL(<0327) lift(QNO) BRL(<04) BRL(<0.324) BRL(c0.347) BRL(c0352) BRL(<OM) BRL(c0.32]) BRL(<0.3)2) BRL(<0,378) Wk(<0.329) BRL(<0.334) Acenap0lMn0 4I1W0 U](IOp N50W mph9 BRL(<032]) BRL(<0328) BRL(<01) BPo.(c0.32q) BRL 1<D.]q]) BRL(<0353) BRL(c0391) Bid(<0.321) BRL(<0.3)2) BRL(<0,3)6) BRL(<0.328) BRL(<0.334) BRL(<0.376) . .. .. FBwrere lOW'1W0 3WW.f000 5000I5W0 mWk9 BRL(<0]27) BRL(<0328) BRL(<04( BPo.(c0.324) 1.11 0373 BRL(<0341) 0RL(<0327J BRL(<0.312) BPL(<03)8) eRL(10.329) BRL(4,334) BRL(<0.37B) DMnvrthrern tOFA0 1W1000 16A000 mWkp BAL(<032]) BRL(<0]2B) BRL(<OA) Bit(c0.324) BFO.(<0.317) BRL(�0.353) BRL(<p.341) BRL(<0.327) BRL(<0312) 6RL(<0.310) 8i6.(<0.329( Bid(c0.334) BRL(<03I6) ANhreceno ImIlm JW]/l000 500W50W mWk9 BRL(<0327) ea.(<0326) BRL(<Q4) BM(c0324) BRL B�(<0 J41) BRL(<0.152) BRL Ic0>at) BRL(<0.327) 0RL(<03]2) BRL(<0970). Bid (<433q B]d(cU76) FlWranUere IMIlO00 30)oi 5000150W mW4 BRL(<032]) BRL(<0.328) BRL(<04) Ba(<DM) BRL(AW) BRL(<9.352) BRL(­) BRL(c0.327)_ 8RL(<0.372) BI1(<03)e) BRL(<0329) BRL(<0.334) BRL(< ii) ren Pye 1000I10W 3?900 500W5 )mWk9 BRL(0327) BRL(<0]28) BRL(<04) BRL(<p324) 1 0522 BRL 1<0341) BRL(<0>27) BRL(<03]1) BRL(<0.378) BRL(<0329) BRL(c0.3u) BRL(<OXB) Bevo(a)anlhrecene 1/7 gW40 3W'3W mWkp BRL(<p 31)) BRL(<0 J26) BRL(<0.4) BRL(<p]21) BRL(A.3a]) BRL 1<0.352) BRL(<0.311) BRL(<0.321) BRL(<0.]72) BRL(<p,3)B) Bid.(<0.329) BAL(<0334) BR1(<0.3]0) Chryaena ]0I70 4WI9W ]006'3]00 mghp BRL(<O.J2>) BRL(<O.J207 BRL(<0.4) BRL(<0 RL 3$q) B (<D.31]) BRL(<0352) BRL(0.341) BRL(<0.32]) BRL(<p3)3) BRL 1<0318) BRL(<0.320J BFQ(<0.334) BRL(<0.3]B) Benxa(b)eu0rar�tyare )AI. Wap 30W3c0 mWkp BId(<0.32]) Bid(<p326) BRL(<p1) BRL(<032Q 8RL(<0.3a)) BRL(<0.35n BRL(<0.30t) BRL(<03Z]) BRL(<0.3)2) BRL(<0.3]B) BId(<0.929) BPo.(<0.3N) BRL(<0.3IB) _ ... .. Benxa(k}Tp,anlMq ]MO 40W4W 3000I.f00p mWk9 BRL(<0321) BRL(<0]28) BRL(<01) BRL(<O.J2q) BRLIA.X]) Bf3(<0.3Y1j BRL(<0.3gf) BRL(<032]) BRL(A 3)2) BRL(<0.378) BIL(<0.3M) BiC(<03T4) 0(8(<03]B) Benxga7pyrere 2l1 N4 30I30 m9M9 BRL(e0.327J BRL(<0.3$8) BRL(<0<) BRL(<O.J24) BRL(<p.347) BRL(<0352) BRL(<0Ali BiR(<0-) BRL(<0.312) BRL(<03]B) BRL(<0.329) BRL(<0.33a) 9RL(<0.378) INena(t,l3cd)PYreno 7R 4W4O 300/300 mWka BRL(<0 RL.32]) B BRL(<D 4) B]d(<0.324) BRL(<D RL 31]) B (c05n BRL 3 (<0341) BRL(<0321) BRL(<0372) BRL(<0.3]B) BRL(<0.328) BRL(<O,3) BRL(<D.37B) Olbelizo(a.tl)aMNacene 0.]/0.7 N4 30i)0 mgft Bid(<0327) BRL(<0.328) BRL 011(<0324) BRL(<0.34]J mR(<0.352) BRL(c()Ul) BRL(<0.327). BRL(<O372) BRL(<OJ76) BRL(<0.329) ML(<0.334) BRL... ... . .. ... ... ... .. .... .. .... .... .. . .. Berizo(Wv)perylme I iWWiW0 3WWl000 500WSOW 19h9 BRL(<O.E])I 0RL(<0.]28) BRL(<04) I Bid(c0.314) BRL(<0.31]) BRL(<0352) BRL(<p.341) I BRL(<0.327) BRL(<0.372)1 Bid(<0.3)el BRL(<0.329) 05d(<0.334) BRL(c0376) V Wa01e P,,"Ntm ayE,oca Nona c5C0 AfWa0c0 mphp 4.54 5.72 - BRL(<3.18) BAL(<2.84) BRL(<2.612), BRL 1<3 BRL(11) BRL(Q.]5) - - <I.]2) BRL(Q69). BRL(<4.04) C9C12 AGDhe0ca mWkp 74A 91.3 BRL(<310) 17.1 42A1 B RL(<311) BRL IQ.IS) - - BRL I'2.72) BRL KW 8RL(<4.0Q C9Ct0Ammetipe 100I100 30Q300 30WSW mWk9 66.5 13 - BRL(<3.18) 10.6 3].1 BPo.(<3,11) BRL(e275) - - BRL(<2.]2) BRL Mcii M Wice.A qW t., mFl SOW P 506:SD0 mWk9 uil 42 BRL(<3.18) BRL I<I.Bq BRL(<1.82). BRL(<3.11) _BRL(Q.]5) __ :. BRL I<2.13) eK K W) BRL(<4.84) C&C12AGPha0 ,AFpn1e0_. _ 1WW10W 30W9W0 SWW50W mplkp fl1B 102 - BRL(<3.18) BRL I<2.04) A] BRL(�311) BRL(Q.T5).. - BRL(<2.]2) BRL(c2W) BRL Revere 1/W V2io 2900 mplkp BRL(c0.133) 651(<p.145) - BRL I<0.12)) BRL 1<0.11Q BRL BRLI<Q124) BRL I<0.11) - - M(<0.109) Bid(<0.10)) BRL(<Qi99) 7WDere MOP 3W1W0 3013m mWkB BRL(c0.133). _Bid(<p.f05)_ BRL(<p.12]) ,_BRL(<0.114) BRL(<0.1p5) BRL(c0134)_ BRL(<D11) BRL I<0.1W) BR.(cClT]), ,BRL(<Q190) Emyl0eiRelre 4WSW 4W1000 4W M mp/kp BRL(cDW) BRL(<0.145) - BRL(<0.127) plm%ylene __ _ BR(<0.114) L(<0.105) BRL(c0.124). BRL(<0,.11) . BRL(<0101) . (<0.19 400.W 4WIM) 4W00 mWp BK(c0.3) BRL(<0.145) BK(_012]) d(<0.114) BRL(<0 RL(c124) _BRL(<011) Bd(<OAW) BRL(4 107) BL019)0-)(ylere 4001500 4W'1Wp 4WI3(n0 mWkp Bld(<Q133) B]d(<0.145) - Bid(<0127) Bfd(<0.114). BRL Ic0.tp51, BRL(<0.12q BRL(<0.11). - - BRL(<O.iWI, _BRA(<Q 107J Bid(<0.191) McNyl leA ddyl enw 0.V1W 0.1]5W p.1500 mWkp BRL(<O.Ofi7J BRL(<0.013) BRL(<0 W4) Bid(<0�) BR(<O.W2) BRL(<p,062) BRL(c0.055) - - Bid(A.O50 Bid(<0.054) BRL(<O.W7) NapMhalarq II500 utOW q/]OW mplkp BRL IeQ 2541 0.288 4148 BRL(<D.2a% BRL(<0.22) BAL(<02t6) BRL(<0215) Bid(e0.3891 HiplBphled etlh Indlcaie cOncenlreROm reI.W e0we Opp.m ld-1 standard9.Beld numbers lnd a W.d W., 1 S daaf..e<ceedW. BEA returned to the Site on September 18, 2012 to oversee the construction of the specified passive venting system. A series of 3 perforated, 4" PVC laterals were set along the washed stone aggregate and plumbed to a solid, 4" PVC riser towards the venting of residuals to outside the dwelling. The PVC laterals were capped with additional washed stone and polyethylene sheeting. The contractor subsequently completed stone backfill of the excavation and began Site restoration by backfilling the excavation with native fill. BEA returned to the Site on September 25, 2012 to perform a second round of groundwater sampling in review of remedial performance and to document the continued absence of petroleum impact to groundwater. Groundwater monitoring results received on October 2, 2012 reported all concentrations of fractional EPH and target PAH analytes as well as fractional VPH and target BTEX analytes as non-detect (ND). In the absence of any evidence of I OCTOBER 9,2012 wHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 8 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 groundwater impacts, it appears that the threat of leaching to groundwater was absolved by the removal of the contaminant source. The significance of these results is further discussed in the Risk Characterization and Environmental Monitoring sections of this report. RISK CHARACTERIZATIONAMMINENT HAZARDS [Refer to Appendix D] Soil As presented, the S-1, S-2 and S-3 (GW-1/GW-3) soils categories are applicable in consideration of Method 1 Risk Characterization, as consistent with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0933. These standards were developed,to evaluate potential ingestion (S-1), inhalation (S-2) and environmental (S-3) exposures, and in consideration of potential leaching of contaminants to groundwater (GW-1/GW-3). For the purposes of risk characterization, the strictest S-1/S-2/S-3 (GW-1), Method 1 Risk Characterization standards are considered in review of exposures related to foreseeable future uses and activities at the Site. Subsequent to contaminated soil removal, soil samples collected from the sidewalls of the excavation (S-1 soils = 0-3', S-2 soils = 3-13') reported all EPHNPH and target PAHBTEX concentrations as less than the strictest S-1 (GW-1/GW-3), Method 1 Risk Characterization standards with one exception. The western bottom-of-hole soil sample (BOH-W@13') reported 2-methylnaphthalene at a concentration greater than the S-1/S-2/S-3 (GW-1) standard of 0.7 ppm. As such, to further qualify exposure risk and threat of leaching under Method 1, BEA developed an Exposure Point Concentration (EPC) in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0926 by averaging the analytical results of S-2 soils (3-13' bgs) as exposure point locations along a continuous excavation. The 0-3', S-1 soils, were not included in the EPC based on the distinct difference in potential exposure risks wherein all discrete S-1 soil samples met the strictest S-1/GW-1, Method 1 Risk Characterization standards. The EPC is presented in Table 1. Based on the computed EPC [2.4035mg/kg/ 8 samples = 0.3004 mg/kg], the averaged 2- methylnaphthalene concentration was now lower than the strictest S-1 (GW-1) threshold [0.03 ppm < 0.7 ppm (S-1/GW-1)]. As such, the reported laboratory analytical results and the computed EPC under Method 1 Risk Characterization have demonstrated that the residual soil impacts along the extent of excavation represent a condition of No Significant Risk. Therefore, laboratory analysis under Method 1 Risk Characterization has demonstrated effective soil remediation and a condition of No Significant Risk with respect to soils at the Site, and no further treatment of soils is required in review of risk characterization and project closure objectives. Under the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0985, additional testing of groundwater was used to support this finding as represented in the following section of this report. Groundwater Based on the CDWSA designation and proximity to groundwater, the GW-1 and GW-3 groundwater categories are considered applicable in consideration of Method 1 Risk Characterization standards, as consistent with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0932. These standards were developed to evaluate potential ingestion (GW-1) and environmental (GW-3) OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 9 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 exposures. The vertical extent of significant soil impact has been qualified as approximately 13` bgs, as some 40' (+/-) above groundwater. Monitoring well installation and testing have reported all EPH/VPH and target analyte concentrations in groundwater as ND over two consecutive quarters wherein the reporting limits were less than the strictest GW-1/GW-3, Method 1 Risk Characterization thresholds, with the exception of Benzo(a)pyrene that had a reporting limit (RL) as the same as the GW-1 Standard on both occasions (0.2 ug/L). In the review of this data wherein the non-target analyte is reported as non-detect, risk characterization allows the consideration of one-half the detection limit as would absolve any issue of significant impacts. Groundwater sampling and associated laboratory analysis over the duration of the project has consistently reported concentrations of EPH and VPH and all target analytes, in all monitoring wells, as ND. Aquifer characterization shows that the monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3 are down gradient of the area of impact as representative of groundwater impacts with quarterly testing though the estimated solute time of travel. Reporting limit concentrations have been reported as lower than or equal to the applicable GW-1 and GW-3, Method 1 — Risk Characterization standards. As such, laboratory analytical data compared to Method 1 - Risk Characterization Standards, demonstrates a condition of No Significant Risk is appropriate and applicable to soils at the Site by the preponderance of physical evidence and exposure risk evaluations represented herein. This data also supports the absence of any threat of soil leaching to groundwater under Method 2 and the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0985 wherein no groundwater impact has been documented well beyond the data of release and following source removal. Indoor Air In accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0942(1) (d), if one or more VOCs is present in vadose zone soil adjacent to an occupied structure (i.e. within 6' horizontally from the wall of the structure or 10' vertically from the basement floor) then the soil has the potential to result in significant indoor air concentrations of OHM and Method 1 alone cannot be used to characterize risk at the Site. Based on endpoint sampling, it would appear the residual petroleum hydrocarbon impacts would not meet the vertical and horizontal separation distances. However, since the structure is a garage building and not occupied, no indoor air quality degradation is foreseeable. However, as a precautionary measure to further qualify any adverse impacts to indoor air quality as unlikely, BEA conducted Method 2, Level 1 — Soil Gas Screening via the sub-slab venting system constructed in the bottom of the excavation as consistent with the provisions of MA DEP Policy WSC-02-411, Implementation of the MA DEP VPH/EPH Approach and the more recent Standard Operating Procedures for Indoor Air Contamination (SOP BWSC-07-01). Photoionization was conducted during the final round of groundwater sampling. The TOV concentrations in the piping manifold from the bottom of the excavation to the surface were reported as 3.1 ppmv. Such measurements were significantly less than the strictest response standard (ethyl benzene) for the instrument used [PID, 10.6 eV lamp], as reported in"Table 4-9: Soil Gas PID/FID Screening Levels for Evaluating Indoor Air Impacts" of the Implementation of the MA DEP VPHIEPHApproach (Policy#WSC-02-411, 10/31/02). Based on the results of the Level I — Soil Gas Screening, impacts to indoor air are not OCTOBER 9,2012 wHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 10 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 likely, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.3.1.1 of the above referenced policy. As such, Method 1 Standards, in conjunction with Level 1 — Soil Gas Screening, have indicated that any residual petroleum impacts in isolated and potentially accessible soils have not, nor are likely in the future to represent a threat of vapor entry into any future building to be constructed on the property. DATA USABILITY ASSESSMENT & REPRESENTATIVENESS EVALUATION The following presents a discussion of the Site information used to support the RAO as required by 310 CMR 40.1056(2) (k) and incorporating the guidance provided in MADEP Policies WSC-07-350 (REDUA) and WSC-10-320 (CAM). It provides an evaluation and demonstration of the adequacy of the spatial and temporal data sets used to support the RAO and makes conclusions on the accuracy, precision and sensitivity of the data used. The following narrative is used in conjunction with the Appendix V REDUA Worksheet and Alpha Analytical Data Usability spreadsheets in Appendix D Conceptual Site Model During the removal of a 330-gallon fuel oil AST at the property, staining was observed to the surrounding soils. The tank was subsequently pumped of its contents and removed from the site. The oil leaked onto the concrete pad beneath the tank and onto the surrounding soils. A preliminary review of the fuel': oil delivery records did not indicate a substantial loss and a Limited Removal Action was undertaken subsequent to initial environmental assessment activities wherein a limited release was indicated, clayey soils of low permeability were present and a 50' separation to groundwater indicated. After removing approximately 37 yards of soil it became apparent that the release was larger than first suspected. Test borings were subsequently performed adjacent to the initial excavation with monitoring wells installed to groundwater at 53' bgs. Mass balance computations using average concentrations and estimated soil volumes indicated that a release of 150+ gallons had transpired over an estimated period of 6 months (August 2011 to June 2012) The release was then reported as a 120-Day Reportable Condition to secure release tracking number 4-24112 for the filing of a Release Abatement Measure Plan to continue response actions, including the further assessment of potential groundwater impacts and additional soil removal activities inclusive of a contingency for remedial additive applications, if required. An additional 49 yards of contaminated soil were removed and a passive venting system was installed in the bottom of the excavation. Endpoint soil samples of sidewall and bottom of hole areas were collected with subsequent laboratory analysis. Results of laboratory analysis reported residual concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil below the most Stringent S-1/GW-1 Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards with the exception of 2-Methylnaphthalene in a single bottom of hole sample. Exposure point concentrations were then calculated for 2-Methylnaphthalene pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0926 by averaging the analytical results of soils along a continuous excavation. OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 11 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 Based on the computed EPC, the averaged 2-methylnaphthalene concentration was lower than the strictest S-1 (GW-1) threshold. Therefore, laboratory analysis under Method 1 Risk Characterization following the removal and remedial waste management of some 86 yards of significantly impacted soils has demonstrated effective soil remediation and a condition of No Significant Risk at the Site. This finding is further supported by additional groundwater analysis in support of Class A-2 Response Action Outcome, documenting a permanent solution has been achieved without any restriction on future activities and use of the property relative to the subject fuel oil release at the site in the vicinity of the former oil tank at the back of the detached garage. Field Screening PID screening and observations were used to qualify significant impact in soils and to make informed dynamic decisions in the field in advance of submitting samples for MA Certified analyses. In some cases, Dexsil Petroflag testing was conducted to qualify TPH concentration in the field. Samples with higher levels of odor or PID readings were assumed to be more contaminated than those samples with lower levels. Comparison of visual, PID and observations with limited analytical data indicates the screening data generally correlates with the analytical data. Sampling Locations Hand boring locations for environmental assessment of petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in soils were selected based on proximity to the point of release. The presence of silty, rocky soils made assessing hand borings to depth impossible. Based on the magnitude of significant impact observed and the inability to advance hand borings beyond 3' bgs, an approximate 10' x 10' x 10'(D) area of impact was projected under the LRA. Subsequent to LRA activities, the area of impact was revised to approximately 20' x 30' x 10'(D). Removal was begun at the western extent of impact and progressed to clean soil. PID screening and Dexsil field-testing were used in technical support of soil removal operations to help identify significant soil impacts and the extent of such impacts. Confirmatory soil samples were preserved for TPH as well as risk-based EPHNPH and target analyte analyses as assisted by such field screening. Based on the applicable soil categories (S-1/S-2/ S-3) and the size of the final excavation, fourteen (14) soil samples were collected for analyses from the extent of soil removal. Sidewall samples were taken from the 0-3' interval and 3-13' interval, with a bottom of hole sample collected from 13'bgs in consideration of exposure risks. Field duplicates or trip blanks were not collected nor considered necessary because the p p rY disposal Site was small, the removal operations had produced clean conditions along all sidewalls, and QA/QC protocols were employed and documented. After collection, the samples were placed in appropriately preserved laboratory containers and stored on ice in a cooler, and subsequently within a refrigerator, pending shipment to the laboratory under a properly executed chain-of-custody. OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 12 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 Temporal Data End point soil sampling''for the second excavation is considered the critical data for soil characterization and exposure risk assessment which does not rely on temporal data wherein the source of fuel oil was removed and vertical and horizontal extent of soil impacts previously characterized. This data was validated as meeting CAM and REDUA requirements. An Exposure Point Concentration was subsequently calculated pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0926(3)(b) which demonstrated a condition of No Significant Risk based on the average concentration being below the most stringent S-1/GW-1 Method 1 Risk Characterization Standard. i Temporal data associated with the two rounds of groundwater sampling beyond the date of release discovery and subsequent source removal is critical to the evaluation of potential leaching of soils to groundwater and any groundwater impacts relative to human ingestion and dermal contact exposures or significant environmental impacts to resource areas. Temporal consideration is given to migration of fuel oil through the vadose zone with a hydraulic conductivity greater than 189 ft/day and groundwater sampling through the time of travel with a groundwater flow velocity of 2.35 ft/day. As such, the temporal groundwater data is critical in consideration of representativeness as representing site-specific solute transport mechanisms and seasonal/tidal groundwater elevations and flow variations. Soil gas screening under,Method 2—Risk Characterization indicates that future indoor air quality will not be significantly impacted as a result of modest residual impact at the extent of excavation. As such, temporal air quality screening was critical to the review of cleanup performance and risk evaluation under the existing policies in affect at the time of such testing. Field Completeness The analytical data set is complete. Data from the sidewall and bottom-of-hole areas was obtained as representing the extent of significant impact and the limits of contaminated soil removal. Data from the monitoring well network was developed over two quarters as representing groundwater conditions over time wherein all petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations are reported as Non-Detect, wherein all response limits were below the most restrictive GW-1 criteria. The complete critical data set supporting the RAO meets the CAM and REDUA requirements for Presumptive Certainty as scientifically valid and technically justified with any deficiencies, elevated reporting limits or bias considered. Data Inconsistency No inconsistent data was identified. Visual observations, odors and field screening were generally well correlated. No significant inconsistency was identified between the field screening of end-point soil samples and their respective laboratory analyses. Data Not Used The complete analytical data set associated with confirmatory end-point soil samples was r OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 13 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 used to support the RAO as representative of Site and environmental conditions subsequent to the excavation of significantly contaminated soils. Analytical data associated with soil assessment, as representative of the identified impact, was used for disposal characterization. Field screening of significantly impacted soil samples collected during environmental assessment was used to select appropriate soil samples for laboratory analysis in review of remedial response actions and risk characterization. All analytical data from groundwater monitoring was reported and considered in review of risk characterization to human and environmental receptors. Data Usability The analytical data used was validated and justified as representative of environmental conditions and usable as meeting Presumptive Certainty. The validation of such data is represented in the hand written comments on the original laboratory report narratives and as summarized in the Data Usability Table at the end of each lab report Appendix D and as further summarized in the REDUA Worksheet. The analytical data provided in support of this RAO have met the method quality control requirements and performance standards for "Presumptive Certainty" as described in CAM VII A, Section 2.0 (a), (b), (c), and (d) or have been evaluated as comparable to CAM requirements. (Refer to Appendix D). The validity and defensibility of the analytical data used to support the findings of the RAO for this Site with respect to accuracy, precision and completeness pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1056(2)(k) have therefore been satisfied. It has been determined that the Site data is sufficiently representative of actual Site conditions and may be used as scientifically justified to support this Class A-2 RAO. BACKGROUND FEASIBILITY EVALUATION A review of cost and feasibility to meet background conditions through additional soil or groundwater treatments was considered as part of this RAM, in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.1020. All residual EPH/VPH and target analyte impact in soil is reported as significantly less than the most restrictive S-1 (GW-1/GW-2/GW-3), Method 1 Risk Characterization standards with the exception of 2-methylnaphthalene along the bottom of hole. The Exposure Point Concentration (EPC) developed under Method 1 Risk Characterization demonstrated a condition of No Significant Risk with respect to soils at the Site as additionally supported by Method 2 and groundwater data. A passive structure venting system exists for continued venting towards background, though the RAMC/Class A-2 RAO is not reliant on any passive treatment or degradation of low- level residuals. Further, wherein laboratory analytical reports groundwater conditions downgradient from the release area as consistent with background, additional soil and/or groundwater treatment is not justified wherein no significant reduction in risk would be accomplished wherein No Significant Risk is present. As such, current environmental conditions associated with residual low-level fractional EPH, fractional VPH and target analytes concentrations in soil, as non-persistent, naturally OCTOBER 9,2012 WHEELERBEAI2-10441 PAGE 14 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 degrading compounds, meet the "Conditions of Categorical Infeasibility" established in Section 9.3.2 of the MA DEP policy "Conducting Feasibility Evaluations Under the MCP" (WSC-04- 160), as specifically pertaining,to Section 9.3.2.3, "Remediation of Degradable (Nonpersistent) Contaminants". Furthermore, wherein residual, low-level EPH, VPH and target analyte concentrations in soils are located beneath the footprint of a permanent structure, and wherein additional excavation under the permanent structure would compromise the integrity of said structure, such additional soil removal is considered infeasible in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.3.2.1, "Excavations Under Permanent Structures" of the above referenced policy (WSC-04-160). CONCLUSIONS Remedial response actions over the course of the project have resulted in the removal of a total of 123.54 tons (86 cubic yards +/-) of fuel oil impacted soils from underlying the former above ground fuel oil tank at the rear of the detached garage. Soil removal under the LRA and extended through the RAM has resulted in removal of significant fuel oil impacts to soils and elimination of the contaminant source as threatening groundwater impacts. Laboratory analysis of soil and groundwater samples have been used to document these findings in review of potential exposure risks and significant environmental impacts under Method 1 and Method 2 considerations to establish a condition of No Significant Risk for potential human exposures and environmental impacts in support of this RAM Completion Statement and a Class A-2 Response Action Outcome wherein a Permanent Solution for all foreseeable future activities and use of the property without restriction. The findings of this investigation, as represented herein, set forth the rationale and technical justification for the LSP Opinions offered, as established by the certifications made on the attached Response Action Outcome Statement (BWSC-104), Release Abatement Measure Transmittal Form (BWSC-106). The LSP Opinions are based on available data and regulations in effect at the time of this reporting specific to the subject Site. Should the Department have .any questions regarding this project, please contact our office at your earliest convenience. Si ly, B TT IRONMENTAL ASSOCIATE �. Mni nne LSP Jo D. Ta e a-Wiel vironinental Scientist Seluor Project Manager Encl: Supporting Documentation [Appendices A-F] cc: Rick& Betty Ann Wheeler—Property Owner Stuart W. Rapp, Esquire—Attorney for Mr. Wheeler Doug Bean—Property Caretaker OCTOBER 9,2012 wHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 15 OF 15 RAMC/CLASS A-2 RAO,RTN 4-24112 Cosmo Gallinaro, LSP, Consultant to Insurer—CommonSense Environmental Tom McKean, Director-Barnstable Health Department] Cynthia Martin- Barnstable Health Department] Thomas K. Lynch-Barnstable Town Administrator] Martin MacNeely, Fire Prevention Officer- COMM Fire Department] 'Narrative,Title Page and Site Plan provided under public notice distribution requirements pursuant to paperwork reduction policy. Full copies of reports(electronic or paper)provided on written request. 1 f RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE COMPLETION STATEMENT WITH CLASS A-2 RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN#4-24112 Wheeler Residence 150 Wheeler Road—Marstons Mills,MA 02648 [Assessors Map 103,Parcel 109002] BEA 12-10441 OCTOBER 9,2012 Prepared For: MA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Southeast Regional Offices: Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup/Emergency Response Section. 20 Riverside Drive-Lakeville,MA 02347 Bob Murphy, Case Officer Prepared By: BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC. 1573 Main Street-Brewster,MA 02631 David C.Bennett,LSP On Behalf Of: Richard W. Wheeler,Property Owner 99 Sudbury Road—Concord,MA 01742 APPENDIX A: Reference Plans -Figure l: Site Locus Plan[USGS Topographic Quad.,Barnstable,MA. 1998] (excerpt) -Figure 2: Ground-Water Resources of the Cape Cod,MA...[LeBlanc et al, 19861 (excerpt) -Figure 3:MA DEP BWSC GIS Map[2012] -Site Plan entitled,"Release Abatement Measure Completion..."Prepared by BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC.,Dated October 3,2012. APPENDIX B: Field Reports -Inspector's Daily Record Forms[#1 (9/6/2012)-#4(9/25/12)] -Monitoring Well Sampling Logs[9/6/12,9/11/12,9/25/12] -Fuel Delivery/Estimated Loss Computations -Solute Transport/Time of Travel Computations APPENDIX C: Environmental Records/Permits/Correspondence -BWSC-104:Response Action Outcome Statement -BWSC-106: Release Abatement Measure Transmittal Form -BWSC-112,A,B Bill of Lading/eDEP filing receipt APPENDIX D: Laboratory Analysis -Analytical Results: Test Boring Sampling Results [Alpha Analytical](Lab#L1212176,7/17/12) Endpoint Soil Sampling Results [Alpha Analytical](Lab#L125940,9/14/12) Groundwater Sampling Results [Alpha Analytical] (Lab#L1212403,7/19/12) Groundwater[Alpha Analytical] (Lab#L1217145, 10/2/12) -REDUA Worksheet and Data Merger Printouts -Table 1:Endpoint Sampling Results Compared to Method 1 Standards with Calculated EPCs APPENDIX E: Health and Safety Plan APPENDIX F: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan l f' i BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS,ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS,GEOLOGISTS,ENGINEERS 1573 Main Street,P.O.Box 1743 (508)896-1706 Brewster,MA 02631 fax(508)896-5109 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: DATE: JOB NUMBER: Mr.Dan Crafton MA DEP(SERO) 8/21/2012 BEA12-10441 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup 20 Riverside Drive REGARDING: Lakeville,MA 02347 RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN RTN 4-24112 SHIPPING METHOD: Regular Mail ❑ Pick Up ❑ Priority Mail ❑ Hand Deliver ❑ Express Mail ❑ Other upload ❑X r-0 ---�! µ,m rc Certified Mail Green Card/RR ❑ b 3 COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION .j _7' 1 8/17/12 Release Abatement Measure Plan ``J Supporting Documentation Wheeler Residence-RTN 4-24112 l °"' t 'sw 150 Wheeler Road=Mar"stons Mills,MA ,, �':' U/s /?E) S//-r. ©65z'P-uz7) ixc 01/ -nad 44EA -it i3O-/ 36 rL. W/t-fcw ;=�-XiCE7j. G/1-944E GVV JbA-T7e4) WAS �.ICAAJ 57V,J W•4 3 Ip/r L=7, s.eJ E3 c 17 V a-t. Oda IV41e iuw� ^1 4072�D AS p�R s,-7L 5/ttZ`77�Pt, 77�2rNrraee/�� W�Zz�s 0E3CR// ®RI e-�,cZ-o s-Q? RUMP iWt--A1-r WAS AJD tv/.Q�cE oG /itJ 5�l--u 477 0 a- 77fE f3 Sv Acb - For review and comment: ❑ For approval: ❑ As requested: ❑ For your use: ❑ w#/(-E si*fjr)mje r IWE REMARKS: L-ICI-0seb cXCA-V —rta,i #ZLL . cc: MA DEP Lockbox(BWSC 106 Form and RAM Fee check no.4765 only) Rick and Betty Ann Wheeler-Property Owners(report on CD) Doug Bean-Property Caretaker(report on CD) Stuart W.Rapp,Esquire-Attorney for Mr.Wheeler(report on CD) Cosmo Gallinaro-Common Sense Environmental(report on CD) Tom McKean,Director-Barnstable Health Department Cynthia Martin-Barnstable Health Department Thomas K.Lynch-Barnstable Town Administrator Martin MacNeely,Fire Prevention Officer-COMM Fire Department Please note:Unless otherwise indicated,Narrative,Title Page and Site Plan provided under public notice distribution requirements pursuant to paperwork reduction policy. Full copies of reports(electronic or paper)provided on written request. FROM: DCB,JTW If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once � P RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN 4-24112 Wheeler Residence 150 Wheeler Road—Marstons Mills, MA 02648 BEA12-10441 AUGUST 17,2012 iu ENNLTT IENVIRONM]ENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS €� GEOLOGISTS & ENGINEERS 1573 Main Street- P.O. Box 1743, Brewster, MA 02631 & 508-896-1706 & Fax 508-896-5109 www.bennett-ea.com BEA12-10291 August 17,2012 Mr. Dan Crafton MA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION(MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office (SERO) Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 RE: RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Wheeler Residence—RTN 4-24112 150 Wheeler Road—Marstons Mills, MA Dear Mr. Crafton, BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. (BEA) has prepared the following Release Abatement Measure Plan (RAMP), with Supporting Documentation, as a summary of release discovery, environmental>assessment and response. actions conducted under a Limited Removal Action (LRA),',since in:nitial release .discovery on June 12, 2012. Formal Release Notification for the 120-Day Reportable Condition was filed on August 6, 2012 after it was determined that end point samples did not meet.the applicable RCS-1 Reportable Concentration standards and potentially more than a 100-cubic yards of soil was impacted. Following Release Notification, Release Tracking Number (RTN) 4-24112 was assigned to the release towards the filing of the following RAM Plan for the implementation of remedial response actions for additional soil removal. This RAMP presents the planned remedial response actions to mitigate significant impacts to soil and potential groundwater impacts by additional soil removal and the subsequent installation of a soil venting system to help with the attenuation of any residually impacted soil and to provide infrastructure as a contingency for additional treatment as may be needed. t Release discovery occurred at the time exterior oil tank (AST) was removed from the property as associated with the conversion to natural gas. The tank removal contractor, Tank Removal Services, LLC, noted petroleum staining beneath the tank and wicking on the wooden walls of the adjacent garage building as witnessed by the COMM Fire Department and Barnstable Health Department representatives. BEA was subsequently contacted by the homeowner and soil testing and analysis confirmed significant petroleum hydrocarbon impacts were present surrounding the concrete pad beneath the tank indicating at least 2 yards of soils with petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations greater than the RCS-1 Reportable Concentrations. Fuel oil delivery records were reviewed and the homeowner interviewed relative to fuel use and in the absence of any indication of a catastrophic loss and depth to groundwater, a 120-Day 1 EMERGENCY SPILL RESPONSE 0 WASTE SITE CLEANUP 6 SITE ASSESSMENT & PERMITTING 6 SEPTIC DESIGN&INSPECTION WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT,OPERATION&MAINTENANCE 0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT,OPERATION&MAINTENANCE I AUGUST 17,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 2 OF 9 RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN Condition was apparent and further environmental assessment was conducted to qualify Notification and appropriate remedial response measures. Hand borings could not be advanced beyond 3' due to clayey and rocky soils at multiple locations attempted around the perimeter of the concrete pad. With limited soil data, an approximate 10'x 10'x 10'(D) area of significant soil impact was estimated and soil removal was planned as a Limited removal Action in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0318. Subsequent to the initial excavation of approximately 30 yards of soils to a depth of 10' adjacent to the unoccupied garage, field screening results and confirmatory soil analysis of the sidewall and bottom of hole areas reported fractional EPH and target analyte concentrations above the applicable RCS-1,Reportable Concentrations. In consideration of further qualifying the specific horizontal and vertical extent of significant soil impacts, and qualify the threat of groundwater impact, three (3) test borings were performed and groundwater monitoring wells were installed. Soil samples from the test borings have qualified the extent and magnitude of significant soil impact in an approximate 20' x 30' x 10-15' (D) area. Monitoring wells found that soil impact was some 30' above the groundwater interface and groundwater samples did not reported any impact above detection limits. Additionally, aquifer testing has been conducted to determine hydraulic conductivity and measured hydraulic gradient in review of groundwater flow and solute fate and transport mechanism under the proposed RAMP. The RAM Plan, presented herein, prescribes the removal of additional impacted soils as facilitated by the use of shoring with steel beams and cribbing to e.protect the adjacent garage. g The RAM will allow for the consideration of an Exposure Point Concentration (EPC) to evaluate endpoint soil conditions under Method 1 and Method 2 — Risk Characterization to qualify potential exposure risks to environmental, ecological and human receptors as including potential leaching of contaminants to the groundwater under provisions of 310 CMR 40.0985. A subsurface venting/SVE system will be installed within the open excavation prior to backfill to facilitate the attenuation of any residual petroleum impacts. Additionally, this infrastructure may be used for additional treatment as may be needed. Performance of the RAMP will be evaluated by end point sampling of soils and quarterly groundwater sampling through the projected Time of Travel for solute migration. It is anticipated that soil removal will eliminate exposures risks, potential critical exposure pathways and minimize environmental impacts towards regulatory closure objectives in the shortest period of time with a high degree of confidence. Future environmental assessment activities will dictate the need for any additional remedial measures to be represented in future RAM Status reports filed within 120 days of this RAM Plan,and then every six months hereafter. Remedial response activities proposed herein, and potentially to follow, are intended to mitigate any Critical Exposure Pathways and Significant Risk to identified human and environmental receptors towards a Permanent Solution in support of a Class A, Response Action Outcome (RAO). It is the objective to offer an RAO in advance of the one-year Tier Classification statutory deadline. AUGUST 17,2012 WHEELERIBEA12-10441 PAGE 3 OF 9 RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN This work has and will continue to be conducted under direct LSP oversight in a manner consistent with the MCP Response Action Performance Standards (RAPS) pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0191 and the QA/QC policies of BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. The facts and statements herein are, to the best of our knowledge, a true and accurate representation of the Site activities, remedial response actions and environmental conditions associated with the project and LSP Opinions acknowledged by the certification on the attached BWSC-105 Transmittal Form. :ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS [Refer to Appendix A] The subject property at 150 Wheeler Road is noted on Barnstable Assessor's Map 103 as Parcel 109002 and is located approximately 1,500' southeast of the intersection of Wheeler Road and Race Lance [Refer to Figure 1] in the Barnstable Village of Marstons Mills. The UTM coordinates for the Site are Northing 4615038m, Easting 382920m. The property contains approximately 7.8 acres of land area and is developed by a one-story residential dwelling and a free-standing garage. The majority of land at the subject property, including the area of release, is upland, with a low-lying area toward Middle Pond at the southwestern property line. The surrounding area is moderately developed and in similar use as characterized by residential properties. Access to the subject property and area of release, as along the exterior wall of the on-site garage, is unrestricted with high frequency/low intensity of use and children potentially present. The dwelling occupants and visitors to the property are identified as the primary potential human receptors to potential inhalation and dermal contact exposures. Groundwater was encountered at 50-55' below grade surface. Regional groundwater contours indicate a south-southeasterly flow direction toward East Bay and Centerville Harbor [Refer to Figure 2]. Site-specific groundwater contours, however, have established a southwesterly local flow direction toward the abutting Middle Pond. Based on the qualified local groundwater flow, Middle Pond represents the primary potential environmental receptor in consideration of Method 1 — Risk Characterization for potentially receiving impacted groundwater. The subject property is not located within the Zone II Protective Radius of a Public Water Supply (PWS), nor is it located within the Zone A protective radius of any surface water reservoir. The Site is shown as a medium-yield potentially productive aquifer as well as a part of the Sole Source Aquifer designated by the EPA for all of Cape Cod east of the canal. There are four properties within 500-feet of the Site which are serviced by potable wells. However these properties are upgradient and cross gradient to the Site. The Site and remaining properties within 500-feet of the Site are serviced by the Centerville-Osterville-Marstons Mills (COMM) water district. As such, the Site is defined as a Current Drinking Water Source Area (CDWSA). Based on the CDWSA designation and proximity to groundwater, the RCGW-1 Reportable Concentrations are applicable per 310 CMR 40.0361, as are the GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1 Risk Characterization standards in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0974. Based on residential use and Site conditions including frequency/intensity of use and accessibility of soils, the RCS-1 Reportable Concentrations are applicable per 310 CMR 40.0362, and S-1/S-2/S-3 (GW-1/GW- r i AUGUST 17,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 4 OF 9 RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN 3), Method 1 — Risk Characterization standards are applicable per 310 CMR 40.0975. These standards were developed in consideration of potential ingestion, inhalation, dermal contact and environmental exposures, and in review of potential leaching of contaminants to groundwater. The Site, as defined by those areas where fuel oil has been released or migrated to, is a small portion of the subject property at the rear of the detached garage containing some 600 SF of land area as roughly defined within the rear wall of the garage and the three monitoring wells. BACKGROUND [Refer to Appendix B] The residence at the property was serviced by a steel, 330-gallon aboveground storage tank (AST) located off the south side of a garage located at the subject property. The vessel was located on a concrete pad. The property owner recently converted the heating system to natural gas and contacted Tank Removal Services (TRS) to remove the old tank. TRS personnel had the contents of the tank pumped on June 12, 2012, wherein 125-gallons of residual fuel oil was removed by Autobody Solvent Recovery Corp and transported to Murphy's Waste Oil Service, Inc. in Woburn, MA (see Manifest provided for reference in Appendix Q. During the pumping of the tank TRS personnel observed petroleum staining on the concrete pad beneath the AST as well as petroleum staining on the walls of the garage building. TRS personnel informed the homeowner that a release of oil may have occurred and that the release should be investigated. The COMM Fire Department and Barnstable Health Department were subsequently notified. BEA was subsequently contacted and engaged by the property owner, to conduct a fuel oil release investigation in review of significant petroleum hydrocarbon impacts, risk characterization and potential liability for remedial response actions. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/PRELIMINARY RESPONSE [Refer to Appendix B] Soil BEA personnel traveled to the subject property on June 15, 2012 to review the Site conditions and circumstances of release, as well as perform environmental assessment to qualify significant petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in review of risk characterization. Upon arrival, BEA noted the subject AST as located off the rear of the garage and an area of distinct staining to surface soils. BEA conducted three hand borings (HBs) in the area of the AST with soil samples collected in 2' intervals [Refer to Site Plan]. Based on the nature of soils as being clayey with cobbles and boulders, the vertical extent of testing was limited to 3' below grade. Each of the samples was placed in a 250-milliliter glass jar with aluminum septum and agitated to develop organic vapors. The samples were subsequently screened by "jar headspace method" with a PID as consistent with the Interim Soils Policy (WSC-94-400). PID screening reported elevated total organic volatile (TOV) concentrations [>28 parts per million by volume (ppmv)] in all samples. BEA field preserved soil samples HB-1:0-3', HB-2:0-3' and HB-3:0-3' on ice in a cooler for MA Certified laboratory analysis of risk-based extractable petroleum hydrocarbon and target polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon(EPH/PAH) concentrations. Laboratory analysis reported fractional C9-C18 Aliphatics concentrations in each of the AUGUST 17,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 5 OF 9 RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN soil samples as greater than the RCS-1 Reportable Concentrations. As such, laboratory analytical had demonstrated significant petroleum hydrocarbon impact in more than two yards of soil, triggering a Release Notification requirement within 120 days and remedial response liability. On June 19, 2012, BEA was on site to oversee the removal of the AST by Tank Removal Services (TRS) from the subject property. Following the removal of an overhang above the vessel, TRS removed the tank from the underlying concrete pad and wrapped the tank in plastic. The area of release was then covered to protect it against rainfall infiltration. Upon further consideration of the types of soils, estimated volume of release from fuel delivery records and the apparent separation to groundwater, it was determined that a Limited Removal Action could be performed for the removal of impacted soils as could address notification and remedial liability generated under the MCP. BEA notified the COMM Fire Department and Barnstable Health Department of planned soil removal. BEA personnel returned to the subject property on June 28, 2012 to oversee soil removal activities to be conducted by Tank Removal Services and Enright Construction. The concrete pad was broken up and impacted soils were removed to 3' below grade surface (bgs) and transported to Aggregate Industries asphalt batching facility in South Dennis under a pre- approved Bill of Lading (provided for reference in Appendix C). A representative bottom-of- hole (BOH) soil sample was collected and field screened with a PID for the presence of organic vapors. A. TOV concentration of 154 ppmv was indicated and soils in the bottom-of-hole and it became apparent that the extent of significant soil impact was greater than estimated. Upon the arrival of a second dump truck, excavation activities resumed as focused on the lateral extent of significant impacts. As visual inspection indicated improved conditions at the lateral extent of excavation at 6-7' bgs, representative sidewall samples were collected for .field screening. Elevated PID screening results, as well as Dexsil PetroFlag soil screening (EPA SW- 846, Method 9074) results indicated persistent significant impacts at each of the sidewall areas. Representative soil samples including "worst case" sidewall SW-N: 3-8' and BOH@8'were forwarded to a certified laboratory for EPH with target analytes analysis. Subsequent laboratory analytical reported fractional aromatics and C9-C18 Aliphatics, as well as 2-methylnaphthalene, as exceeding the S-1/GW-1 Method 1 —Risk Characterization standards. Based on site conditions and the extent of significant impacts greater than the RCS-1 standards with an apparent threat of significant groundwater impact, it was apparent that the Limited Removal Action was no longer appropriate and that remedial response actions would need to proceed under an alternative regulatory vehicle as either a Release Abatement Measure or Immediate Response Action. Groundwater To further qualify Notification and the appropriate regulatory vehicle for Site cleanup, BEA furthered environmental characterization of the subject property on July 9, 2012 with the advancement of test borings (TBs) to advance soil sampling to depth and for the installation of monitoring wells (MWs) in review of potential groundwater impacts. BEA directed Jenkins Y AUGUST 17,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 6 OF 9 RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN Well Drilling in the advancement of TB4, TB-2 and TB-3 towards the installation of monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3, respectively. Test Boring TB-1 was advanced on the west side of the excavation; TB-2 to the south in a clearly down gradient location and TB-3 to the east of the excavation. Field headspace screening of soils at 23-25' below grade surface in TB-2 and 28-30' bgs and capillary fringe soils (53-55' bgs) in test boring TB-3 reported elevated PID responses. Representative soil samples TB-2: 23-25', TB-3:28-30' and TB-3:53-55' were prepared and forwarded to a certified laboratory for confirmatory EPH with target PAH analysis. The TB- 3:53-55' soil sample was also analyzed for volatile petroleum hydrocarbon (VPH) with target BTEX analyses. Laboratory analytical results subsequently reported low-level fractional EPH impacts to the TB-3:28-30' soil sample. These concentrations were well below the applicable S- 1/GW-1 Method 1 —Risk Characterization standards. On July 11, 2012 the monitoring well top-of-casing elevations were surveyed to a common vertical datum in review of static water level elevations towards calculating local groundwater flow. BEA also performed a series of slug tests at monitoring well MW-1 to qualify hydraulic conductivity and characterize the aquifer in review of solute fate and transport. The Geraghty and Miller AQTESOLV program was employed to interpret the results of the slug tests wherein a hydraulic conductivity of 189.7333 feet per day was computed as consistent with the clean, medium sands encountered within the upper portion of the aquifer. Based on the calculated hydraulic conductivity and the hydraulic gradient reported along the Site-specific groundwater flow vector, the groundwater velocity was reported as 2.3527 ft/day. Based on a retardation factor.of 20%, the corresponding solute Time of Travel from the release area to the down gradient MW-2 and MW-3 monitoring wells was reported as 7 days and 9 days, respectively [Refer to Appendix B]. The significance of these results is further discussed in the Risk Characterization and Environmental Monitoring sections of this report. Site-specific groundwater flow direction was calculated as southwesterly wherein monitoring well, MW-2 and. MW-3 are noted as down gradient of the area of release. BEA returned to the subject property on August 3, 2012 to again record static water level measurements. The site-specific groundwater flow direction was confirmed as southwesterly, substantiating the representativeness of MW-2 and MW-3 as down gradient of the release area. BEA then developed, purged and sampled the monitoring well network in review of significant groundwater impacts. Groundwater samples were collected for EPH/PAH and VPH/BTEX laboratory analyses. Laboratory analytical results reported all EPH/VPH and target analyte concentrations in all wells as non-detect, wherein the reporting limits for all contaminants of concern were less than the strictest GW-1, Method 1 Risk Characterization standards. RISK CHARACTERIZATIONAMMINENT HAZARDS [Refer to Appendix E] Soil As presented, the RCS-1 Reportable Concentrations, as well as the S-1, S-2 and S-3 (GW-1/GW-3) soils categories are applicable in consideration of Method 1 Risk AUGUST 17,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 7 OF 9 RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN Characterization. Laboratory analysis has confirmed the persistent presence of Cll-C22 fractional aromatics and C9-C 18 Aliphatics, as well as 2-methylnaphthalene, as exceeding the RCS-1 Reportable Concentrations as well as the S-1/GW-1 Method 1 — Risk Characterization standards. As such, additional remedial response and waste site cleanup activities are prescribed under the RAMP to absolve potential exposure risks and to meet regulatory closure objective without limitation of activities or use of the property. Groundwater As presented, the RCGW-1 Reportable Concentrations, as well as the GW-1 and GW-3 groundwater categories are applicable in consideration of Method 1 Risk Characterization. These standards were developed to evaluate potential ingestion(GW-1) and environmental (GW- 3) exposures. Groundwater sampling and associated laboratory analysis have reported no significant impacts in any of the on-site monitoring wells, including MW-2 and MW-3 which have been substantiated as located in a hydraulically down gradient location to the area of release. Notwithstanding, it has been established that there is potential for the leaching of the petroleum hydrocarbons to groundwater and additional source removal and evaluation of alternative leach-based standards under Method 2 through a collection of temporal data is prescribed within the RAMP. Indoor Air Wherein the area of release does not impact an occupied structure, no indoor air quality monitoring is warranted and none has been conducted. RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN [Refer to Appendix E] The information from the assessment of current soil and groundwater conditions was used to develop a remedial strategy for the excavation of the remaining significantly impacted soils from the identified release area noted on the site plan. As such, temporary structural support of the garage building along the south side will be constructed and installed by a licensed contractor with appropriate permitting. Subsequent to the shoring of the garage building,the environmental contractor will use an excavator to segregate and stockpile clean overburden material along the sidewall areas to 3' and extend removal of contaminated soils laterally. Once soil removal has been completed laterally to closure objectives, the contractor will be requested to advance the bottom of hole and sidewall under the garage to the limit of the shoring capacity. It is anticipated that an additional 50-100 cubic yards (+/-) of significantly impacted soils will be generated under the RAMP. A completed Bill of Lading has been included to facilitate direct loading and transportation into standing dump trucks for transport to Aggregate Industries South Dennis asphalt batch facility. Following the removal of significant soil impact as anticipated before the end of August 2012, confirmatory end-point soil samples will be collected for risk-based EPH/PAH analysis, or for TPH analysis as a cost saving measure wherein field-testing indicates petroleum impacts are AUGUST 17,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 8 OF 9 RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN clearly absent. After sample collection and field screening, a subsurface venting system will be constructed and installed in j the excavated area of release. The venting system will be constructed of 4 x 4" perforated PVC pipe laterals, as set in washed stone along the bottom-of- hole area (refer to site plan). A 4" solid piece of PVC riser will be plumbed to the lateral components and connected to a wind turbine for the passive venting of residual volatiles petroleum compounds. The venting system will also provide the flexibility to deliver remedial additives, as may be necessary to mitigate significant residual soil impacts or for any groundwater treatment. The monitoring wells will be gauged and inspected on a monthly basis with quarterly groundwater sampling continuing in September 2012 following soil removal. These inspections and quarterly groundwater analysis will be used to fully evaluate the potential leaching of petroleum hydrocarbons to groundwater. The further treatment of soils and/or impacted groundwater will be evaluated from the results of end-point soil sampling and future quarterly groundwater assessment. Specifications of potential remedial equipment, operations and maintenance, or use of any remedial additives will be represented as a modification of the RAM; if applicable, to be reported in subsequent RAM Status (RAMS) reports. All such work will be compiled on "Inspector's Daily Record of Work Progress" reports and documented in a RAM Status Report or RAM Completion Report to be submitted within 120 days of this filing. CONCLUSIONS f Preliminary response actions and the implementation of engineering controls have served to isolate the release area such that there is no apparent Substantial Hazard and No Imminent Hazard conditions present at the time of reporting. The Release Abatement Measure Plan, represented by this filing, will'employ an aggressive soil removal strategy for the excavation and disposal of up to a total of 150 cubic yards (225 tons) of significantly impacted soils from the release area identified on the Site Plan in Appendix A. Under the RAMP BEA will direct the segregation of clean overburden material, surrounding the existing excavation, to accommodate the excavation and disposal of contaminated soils. Field PID screening and Dexsil testing will be used by BEA personnel to provide technical assistance and direct excavation operations. Additionally, a subsurface venting system will be constructed and set in washed stone aggregate prior to final restoration for venting of residual petroleum hydrocarbons, and/or future remedial additive applications if necessary. This work is intended to eliminate the contaminant source and associated exposure risks to identified human and environmental receptors towards achieving a condition of No Significant Risk in support of a permanent,solution. This work is scheduled to begin during the fourth week of August 2011 (8/24/11). A RAM Status Report or RAM Completion Report with Response Action Outcome (RAO) will be submitted within 120 days of this filing. Any subsequent RAM Status Reports will be filed every six months thereafter until a preponderance of physical evidence supports a condition of "No Significant Risk"and RAO objectives are met as supporting an RAM Completion Report. AUGUST 17,2012 WHEELER/BEA12-10441 PAGE 9 OF 9 RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN The findings of this investigation, as represented herein, set forth the rationale and technical justification for the LSP Opinions offered, as established by the certifications made on the attached Release Abatement Measure Transmittal Form (BWSC-106) and Bill of Lading Transmittal Form (BWSC-112). The LSP.Opinions are based on available data and regulations in effect at the time of this reporting specific to the subject Site. Should the Department have any questions regarding this project, please contact our office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, B VIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. r y 1 avid . nnett, LSP J Tad m Wielan lronmental Scientist Pr' ' a Sor Project Manager Encl: Supporting Documentation [Appendices A-F] cc: Rick& Betty Ann Wheeler- Property Owner Stuart W. Rapp, Esquire—Attorney for Mr. Wheeler Tom McKean, Director- Barnstable Health Department Cynthia Martin-Barnstable Health Department Thomas K. Lynch- Barnstable Town Administrator Martin MacNeely, Fire Prevention Officer- COMM Fire Department REL EASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN#4-24112 Wheeler Residence 150 Wheeler Road—Marstons Mills, MA 02648 BEA12-10441 AUGUST 17,2012 Prepared For: MA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Southeast Regional Offices: Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup/Emergency Response Section 20 Riverside Drive-Lakeville,MA 02347 Prepared By: BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 1573 Main Street-Brewster,MA 02631 David C. Bennett,LSP On Behalf Of: Rick&Betty Ann Wheeler 99 Sudbury Road Concord,MA 01742 APPENDIX A:Reference Plans -Figure 1: Site Locus Plan[USGS Topographic Quad.,Barnstable,MA. 1998] (excerpt) -Figure 2: Ground-Water Resources of the Cape Cod,MA...[LeBlanc et al, 1986] (excerpt) -Figure 3:MA DEP BWSC GIS Map [2012] -Site Plan entitled,"Release Abatement Measure Plan..."Prepared by BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES,INC.,Dated August 9,2012. APPENDIX B: Field Reports -Field Response Log -Geologic Borehole Logs -Monitoring Well Sampling Logs [7/11/12, 8/3/12] -Borehole Permeability Test -AQTESOLV Slug Test Data -Solute Time of Travel Calculations APPENDIX C: Environmental Records/Permits/Correspondence -BWSC-101:Release Log Form -BWSC-103:Release Notification Form -BWSC-106:Release Abatement Measure Transmittal Form -BWSC-112:MA DEP Bill of Lading -Aggregate Industries Soil Recycling Submittal -Tank Removal Permit -Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest[008524411 JJK(oil removed from tank)] APPENDIX D: Laboratory Analysis -Environmental Assessment-Soil[Alpha Analytical] (Lab ID#L1210708,6/22/12) -Environmental Assessment-Soil[Alpha Analytical](Lab ID#L1211840,7/11/12) -Environmental Assessment-Soil[Alpha Analytical] (Lab ID 91,1212176,7/17/12) -Environmental Assessment-Groundwater[Alpha Analytical] (Lab ID#L1212403, 7/19/12) APPENDIX E: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan APPENDIX F: Site Health and Safety Plan RIEDELL OIL COJCANAL FUK CO PO BOX 692 $AO M¢RE,MA 02601 800-2444317 Acmd 0 2OU11.1 WHEELER REALTY TRUST WHEELER REALTY TRUST - 99 SUDBURY RD 150 WHEELER RD CONCORD,MA 01T42 MARSTON$MILLS,MA 02 a DATE TRANS f REF 09WRIISTION COMMENTS AMOUNT BALANCE PREVIOUS BALANCE $0.00 $0.p0 02-02-10 298440 R 145765 02 HEATING 163.50 Q 2.892' $473.99 $473.99 03-00-10 302M R 145766 CHECK PAYMENT CK#597 ($473.10) $0.00 08-19.10 312428 R 148957 #2 HEATING 145,90 Q Z64 ' $370.60 $370.59 M14-10 313720 R 148957 CHECK PAYMENT CK4E39 ($370.59) $0.00 12-14-10 320211 R 203846 #2 HEATING 55.20 0 3.099 $171.05 $171.06 014)4-11 322586 R 203M CHECK PAYMENT CKIM ($171.06) $O.DD 02-11-11 327705 R 208903 #2 HEATING 175.90 Q 3.449 $608.66 5606.68 02-2&11 329406 R 206903 CHECK PAYMENT CIO NO ($171.05) $435.62 03-31A 1 333316 R FIN CHARGE 435.62 0 0.015 $6.53 - $442.15 04 28-11 335406 R 206903 CHECK PAYMENT CKOM ($442.15) $0.00 06-11-11 341152 R 233091 #2 HEATING 113.800 3.669 $418.80 $416,80 08-18.11 341356 R 233091 CHECK PAYMENT CK#719 ($416.80) $0.00 01-16-12 353818 R 3898 ESTIMATE SITE EVAL FOR TANK $0.00 $0.00 -Sog2- June 13,2012 9;31 am All TrMnsectim Page 1 of 1 13/T0 39ad 68Z0Z9E805 Wd8T:Z0 ZTBZ/61/90 _..__ Ala-r��r ���� �C/�Ce-/ - � ` • , , i Y-, 7 CO. s . eld cli {ate k- �-u a d Vi 1, Z ',# -0 a r Oz 1-7 a - A MM DD yyyy ete NFIRS -1 101920 U 1 06 1 1 121 1 2012 11 112-0001546 1 000 ❑Change Basic FDID * State* Incident Date * Station Incident Number * Exposure No Activity Check this box to Indicate that the address for this incident is provided on the Wildland Fire Census Tract I SB Location* Module In Section 6 "Alternative Location Specification". Use only for Wildland fires. ®Street address 150 " JWHEELER RD ❑Intersection Number/Milepost Prefix Street or Highway Street Type Suffix ❑In front of f ❑Rear of IMr'1RSTONS MILLS J L� 02648 -U ❑Adjacent to Apt./Suite/Room City State Zip Code .J ❑Directions Cross street or directions, as applicable Incident e * Midnight is 0000 C 2'YP El Date � Times E2 Shift & Alarms 413 10il or other combustible liquidC Check boxes it dates are the Month Day Year Hr Min Sec Local option Incident Type same as Alarm ALARM always required I� I COM31 Aid Given or Received* Date. Alarm * �Q� 12 2012 �15:34:53 shift or Alarms District DPlatoon 1 ❑Mutual aid received ARRIVAL required, unless canceled or did not arrive ' ❑ Arrival * L 00 121 1 20121115:48:24 I E3 2 ❑Automatic aid recv. � Their FDID Their 3 []Mutual aid given State CONTROLLED Optional, Except for wildland fires Special Studies 4 []Automatic aid given I I ❑Controlled " " 11 1 I Local Option 5 []Other aid given Their LAST UNIT CLEARED, required except for wildland fires II I N ❑ ❑ Cleared Incident Number Last Unit 06 12 special Study Value None �2012_1 16:26:10 F° Actions Taken * Gl Resources * G2 Estimated Dollar Losses & Values ❑ Check this box and skip this LOSSES: Required for all fires if known. Optional section if an Apparatus or 43 (Hazardous materials I Personnel form is used. for non fires. None Primary Action Taken (1) Apparatus Personnel Property $LI , 000 , 0001El Suppression �_� u Contents $�� 000 , 000 El- 82 (Notify other agencies. Additional Action Taken (2) j EMS PRE—INCIDENT VALUE: Optional 86 lnnvestigate other 0001 1 0001 Property $1 000 1 000 ❑ Additional Action Taken (3) ❑ Check box if resource counts include aid received resources. Contents $LJ , L 000 ,L 000 ❑ Completed Modules Hl*Casual ties❑None H3 Hazardous Materials Release I Mixed Use Property ❑Fire-2 Deaths Injuries N ❑None NN Not Mixed I ' I ' 10 Assembly use ❑Structure-3 Fire U I� 1 ❑Natural Gas: alga leak, no evanation or HazMat actions 20 Education use Service ❑Civil Fire Cas.-4 2 ❑Propane gas: <21 lb. tank (as in home HaQ grill) 33 Medical use ❑Fire Serv. Cas.-5 Civiliani 3 ❑Gasoline: vehicle fuel tank or portable container 40 Residential use ❑EMS-6 4 ❑Kerosene: fuel burning equipment or 51 Row of stores H2 Detector. portable storage 53 Enclosed mall ❑HazMat-7 Required for Confined Fires. 5 ❑Diesel fuel/fuel oil:vehicle fuel tank or portable 58 Bus. & Residential ❑Wildland Fire-8 6 ❑Household solvents: home/office ill, cleanup only 59 Office use 1❑Detector alerted occupants � Y ©APParatus-9 7 ❑Motor oil: from engine or portable container 60 Industrial use Personnel—l0 2�Detector did not alert them 8 ❑Paint• from paint cans totaling<55 gallons 63 Farm use use ❑Arson-il � 65 Farm use U❑Unknown 0 ❑Other: Special HazlL t actions required or spill>55gal., 00 Other mixed use Please con,plete the HazMat form J Property Use* Structures 341❑Clinic,clinic type infirmary 539 ❑Household goods,sales,repairs , 342❑Doctor/dentist office 579 Motor vehicle/boat sales/repair 131 ❑Church, place of worship 361❑Prison or jail, not juvenile 571 ❑Gas or service station 161 ❑Restaurant or cafeteria 419991-or 2-family dwelling 599 ❑ Business office 162 ❑Bar/Tavern or nightclub 429❑Multi-family dwelling 615 El Electric generating plant 213 ❑Elementary school or kindergarten 439❑Rooming/boarding house 629 ❑Laboratory/science lab 215 ❑High school or junior high 449[]Commercial hotel or motel 700 ❑Manufacturing plant 241 ❑College, adult education 459❑Residential, board and care 819 ❑Livestock/poultry storage(barn) 311 ❑Care facility for the aged 464❑Dormitory/barracks 882 Non-residential parking garage 331 ❑Hospital 519❑Food and beverage sales 891 ❑Warehouse Outside 936❑vacant'Got 981 ❑Construction site 1,ill 124 ❑Playground or park 932,QGradedkcare for plot of land 984 ❑ Industrial plant yard 655 s � ❑crops or orchard 946 ❑Lake, river, stream Lookup and enter a Property Use code only if 669 ❑Forest (timberland) 951 ❑Railroad right of way you have NOT checked a Property Use box: 807 ❑Outdoor storage area 960 ❑Other street Property Use 1419 �,f; 919 ❑Dump or sanitary landfill 1961 ,Q,,HYghwad`.vided highway 931 ❑Open land or field �362 Residential street/driveway 11 or 2 family dwelling NFIRS-1 Revision 03 11 99 COMM Fire District 01920 06/12/2012 12-0001546 MM DD YYYY 01920 1 U 1 61 L12J 2012 L 1 12-0001546 000 Complete FDID State Incident Date Station Incident Number Exposure Narrative `Narrative: Caller Name : MCNEELY Caller Phone : 329 Caller Address : SAA OIC : MCNEELY Pats. . 0 AGR : NINone rpierce ; 2012/06/12 15:48:24 - 329 AT EVENT MANNING IS 1 rpierce ; 2012/06/12 15:35:35 329 - INV. LEAKING FUEL TANK rpierce ; 2012/06/12 15:55:08 329 GET AN ETA FROM BOH rpierce ; 2012/06/12 15:56:43 BOH ETA 10-15 MIN. rpierce ; 2012/06/12 16:26:05 329 - TURNED OVER SCENE TO BOH THEY WILL CONTACT DEP / CLEAR Rick Mahoney from Tank Removal Services in station to apply for aboveground tank removal permit an indicated tank likely had been leaking. 329 on location found 330 gallon aboveground outside #2 fuel oil tank on side C of a detached 2 car garage. Upon investigation found tank that had been "weeping" oil from small leak or leaks on bottom of tank for weeks, months or possibly longer. Tank is on cement pad and debris on pad (leaves, pine needles, etc. ) are saturated with a strong petroleum odor. In addition, it appears as though the wood siding on the garage adjacent to the tank is also saturated with of from the ground up to 2 or 3 feet high up the wall. The tank removal company removed the remaining oil from the tank (125 gallons) in order to stop further leaking. Tank and immediate area covered wiith plastic. Cindy Martin from the BOH on location and advised of situation, she will make notification to DEP. Doug Bean (508-280-5042) caretaker also on location representing the homeowners (Wheelers) . David Bennett LSP from Bennett Environmental contacted and he will evaluate site within 24hrs. No further issues, 329 cleared scene. COMM Fire District 01920 06/12/2012 12-0001546 Rl Person/Entity Involved I I 1J 1 1 Local Option Business name (if applicable) Area Code Phone Number �❑Check This Box if I� I I LJ I I u same address as Mr.,Ms., Mrs. First Name MI Last Name Suffix incident location. Then skip the three duplicate address Number Prefix Street or Highway Street Type Suffix lines. Post Office Box Apt./Suite/Room City u I -u State Zip Code ❑More people involved? Check this box and attach Supplemental Forms (NFIRS-1S) as necessary K2 owner ❑ Same as person involved? Then check this box and skip I I 1978 - 3 6 9 - 7 7 3 6 The rest of this section. Local Option Business name (if Applicable) Area Code Phone Number IRICHARD I 1WHEELER ❑ Check this box if Mr.,Ms., Mrs. First Name MI Last Name. Suffix same address as incident location. I99 ISUDBURY RD u Then skip the three duplicate address Number Prefix Street or Highway Street Type Suffix lines. II (CONCORD Post Office Box Apt./Suite/Room City IMMA 1102576 ,-1 State Zip Code Z Remarks Local Option Caller Name : MCNEELY Caller Phone : 329 Caller Address : SAA OIC : MCNEELY Pats. . 0 AGR : NINone rpierce ; 2012/06/12 15:48:24 - 329 AT EVENT MANNING IS 1 rpierce ; 2012/06/12 15:35:35 329 - INV. LEAKING FUEL TANK rpierce ; 2012/06/12 15:55:08 329 GET AN ETA FROM BOH rpierce ; 2012/06/12 15:56:43 BOH ETA 10-15 MIN. rpierce ; 2012/06/12 16:26:05 329 —TURNED OVER SCENE TO BOH THEY WILL CONTACT DEP / CLEAR Rick Mahoney from Tank Removal Services in station to apply for aboveground tank removal permit an indicated tank likely had been leaking. 329 on location found 330 gallon aboveground outside #2 fuel oil tank on side C of a detached 2 car garage. Upon investigation found tank that had been "weeping" oil from small leak or leaks on bottom of L Authorization 18350 I IMACNEELY, MARTIN 0. IISR. INSPEC I 1 1 061 L L2J 1 2012 Officer in charge ID Signature Position or rank Assignment Month Day Year CheBox ® 18350 IMACNEELY, MARTIN 0. INSPEC L 061 2012U same Position or rank Assignment Month Day Year as Officer Member fiking report ID 'gn ture ri n charge. / I 1 COMM Fire District 01920 06/12/2012 12-0001546 CENTERVILLE-OSTERVILLE-MARSTONS MILLS.FIRE DISTRICT 1875 ROUTE 28 CENTERVILLE, MA 02632 (508) 790-2375/FAX#(508) 790-2385 OIL/HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RELEASE FORM F.A.# LOCATION:ADDRESS OF RELEASE: 56 W oClc� r DATE OF RELEASE: ✓�I� PRODUCT RELEASED: ESTIMATED QUANTITY: L-4 � CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN BY RESPONSIBLE PARTY: ( �i��I76t�4s -- - ---NOTIFICATIONS:-- ------------— _ FIRE DEPARTMENT: YES NO( ) DATE: %� ��- TIME:�15 h NATIONAL RESPONSE CER YES( ) NO DATE: TIME: DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION YES NO( ) DATE: TIME: OIL SPILL COORDINATOR: YES ) NO( ) DATE: I TIME: f TOWN BOARD OF HEALTH:- YES ) NO( DATE- TIME• TOWN HARBORMASTER: , YES( ) NO ) DATE: TIME: OTHER AGENCIES: COMMENTS: ro 2 oTf OC lecL_ REPORTED BY: Al / o V DATE: , COPY-FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY-D.E.P. COPY-BOARD OF HEALTH C-0-MM FORM#58 I Sb ';A27 DIVIS)I e t TOWN OF BARNSTABLE LOCATION//5-0. dt �: SEWAGE #` , P VILLAGE ASSESSOR'S MAP & LOT �I INSTALLER'S NAME & PHONE NO � SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY d 02) Ao LEACHING FACILITY:(type&ZV/" n (size)/© � NO. OF BEDROOMS -j PRTV - b-aR PUBLIC WATER BUILDER OR OWNER AZ::!!��� mad2 DATE PERMIT ISSUED: 'y ` �6 41 DATE COMPLIANCE ISSUED: VARIANCE GRANTED: No 0 r 1 � J I N l t 'ASSESSORS MAP NO: �— Fizz-2-0 .......... THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Applutt#iou for Diipusal Works Tonstrurtuan runfit Application is hereby made for a Permit to Construct ( ) or Repair ( ) an Individual Sewage Disposal System at: -------------I----------------.----•------- ----------------------------------------- c ion- dress or Lot No. : .Q. ---------------------------------- ----------•-... --- - - ------- -- wnez ddress a W �Xo_ . ...--. �-----------------------••------------- -- . -- . ---... ._Installer Address - � Type of Building Size Lot._�________D _®D--------Sq. feet Dwellingg No. of Bedrooms............................................Expansion Attic ( ) Garbage Grinder ( ) 4 Other—T e of Building No. of persons............................ Showers — Cafeteria a � Other fixtures --------------------------------•-----------------•---.-------------------------------------------•---•------------•------------------.._.....-------- W Design Flow--------------------------------------------gallons per person per day. Total daily flow............................................gallons. WSeptic Tanker Liquid capacity a _gallons Length................ Width................ Diameter--------:------- Depth................ x Disposal Trench—No..................... Width.................... Total Length.................... Total leaching area....................sq. ft. Seepage Pit No-------------------- Diameter--___.__.______•____ Depth below inlet.................... Total leaching area..................sq. ft. Z Other Distribution box ( ) Dosing tank ( ) aPercolation Test Results Performed by-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date........................................ Test Pit No. I................minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit.................... Depth to ground water........................ 44 Test Pit No. 2................minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit.................... Depth to ground water........................ a ------ 0 Description of Soil...../11. x W ................ ...........•----•---------•-----.----•--•-------•--•-•--••-------------•............-----•-•--- f ._ ._ ---------U Na�ofers o to tions—Answer when applicable._ . . .... ............ . .••-•--•-•-----••---••--•••-•••••------------•••-•------•----•-•--•--••-••----•-••••-•-••-•••----•-•-•••••--•-•-•••-•-•••-••-•-.....-••-•-•----•••------ - Agreement: The undersigned agrees to install the aforedescribed Individual Sewage Disposal System in accordance with the provisions of TITLE 5 of the State Environmental Code—The undersigned further agrees not to place the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued bDV the and of health. Signed .. � .......�..`....------. \� Dace ApplicationApproved By .......... -----�-� `j---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -y.-..�.�1.-.../.6------ Dare Application Disapproved for the following reasons- -------...........................................................---------------------- ......................................... ------------------ ................... Dace PermitNo. .................. .. ......S. .....----------- Issued f-_1-- ?v............--...------ .. Dare } ,• . ........ ................., T THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ^' BOARD OF HEAILTH TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Appliration for UiipmFai Works Tonstrurtiun ramit Application is hereby made for a Permit to Construct ( ) or Repair ( ) an Individual Sewage Disposal System at: ...lso 9./�.� ..� ._......�. �.r_. •---------------------------------------------•---................................................ L cation- dflress ---------- ------------ -----------------or Lot No. Owner Address. Installer Address QType of Building Size Lot--- ......Sq. feet Dwelling No. of Bedrooms____________________________________________Expansion Attic ( ) Garbage Grinder ( ) Other—T e of Building No. of persons............................ Showers — Cafeteria P I Other fixtures ---------------------------------------------- W Design Flow............................................gallons per person per day. Total daily flow............................................gallons. WSeptic Tank T Liquid capacity. P gallons. Length................ Width................ Diameter................ Depth................ x Disposal Trench—No. .................... Width.................... Total Length.................... Total leaching area....................sq. ft. Seepage Pit No..................... Diameter.................... Depth below inlet.................... Total leaching area..................sq. ft. Z Other Distribution box ( ) Dosing tank ( ) t, aPercolation Test Results Performed by.......................................................................... Date........................................ 14 Test Pit No. I................minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit.................... Depth to ground water------------------------ 4 Test Pit No. 2................minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit.................... Depth to ground water-_-_--____--___-•-_____. W •-•••-• xDescription of Soil...... !, '? RO1 --•---------------------------•----------------------------------------...---------------------.----.---......:.._...... U ------------------------------------------- .--•-------•-----------. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ W U Nature of Repairs 2oL Alterations—Answer when applicable..Ar -� dr -------Co p... �--, t _ ..............:......... .�.b..__...- �.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Agreement: The undersigned agrees to install the aforedescribed Individual Sewage Disposal System in accordance with the provisions of TITLE 5 of the State Environmental Code—The undersigned further agrees not to place the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the b and of health. Signed .. ' A 1�....... �� ---------- V - Application Approved By .......... �-r�--.-..--�/.�.... ' Ytit--�--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date Application Disapproved for the following reasons- -----------------------------------------------------............................. -- ---------------------------------------------- -----------......................-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------ll--a te - .................. "• Permit No. 70 ... .K Issued - ..-/-`�' ?jo................----------- Date THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH TOWN OF BARNSTABLE IvIlEzttfteate of Tontylial tre THIS IS TO CERTIFY, That the Individual Sewage Disposal System constructed ( ) or Repaired by.......................----L-----------— ----------------------------------Insta---ller-----------....----------------.....-...---....--------.......--------------...--------------------------..---------------- at -----------------1 -5 0.-:........ c .-----IA ----------- M--------------------------...............-----....---------------------------------------------------------------- has been installed in accordance with the provisions of TITLE 5 of The State Environmental Code as described in the application for Disposal Works Construction Permit No. ...... ._=..1.. .. dated ....n.......................................... THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE THAT THE SYSTEM WILL FUNCTION SATISFACTORY. DATE........... "a ' p ,� f Ins ector ....• .... ....: ` ----........ i THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH - q TOWN OF BARNSTABLE No. /.� - 1 �1.�.�.` FEE.3 ............ Disposal Works Tunstrnrti.on "anti# Permission is hereby granted.._ G� Qp: ..............: .................. , to Construct ( ) or Repair (>) an Individual Sewage Disposal System qq at No/ a ......s; _.......' -r- ..�:, ------------------------------ ............................................... `Street << as own ofi th pplicataon for Disposal Works Construction Permit No _�� .. Dated.\_..•.___... ................................................ -.....................................................'. � dB�ard of Health \C � L.DATE_ ...........-�`-`•/�i,_9/ ..-•--•--•-•-•------•---�--......--- •,.� �o,F F FOR.MI�8508 HOBBS&WARREN.INC..PUBLISHERS \. L-O.0 S, 1-0-N SEW�;C�E_P_ER.MIT_1.10.. --- - - - - --�b - t.hl_ST.Q- -LE- - 1JANlE-�-AD DRE_S S 5-U 1-L-D E-- -5 Q-&1�/l E- _QeD D R E SS ' �h►=T-E P E_R__t�/11�F ISSUED',��� Co�5 9��---- - �, � .. ., .. � I ..r , . ,. 1 v t� :. C�'V .:. ... . .. 1 ,. ,.,. ,. .. ,� � J a �. III �•; G'U , THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH _........ OF..................................... ....................... - ......... - Appliration for Uigpviittl Workg Tutu #rnrtion Vrrnift Application is hereby made for a Permit to Construct ( ) or Repair ( ) an Individual Sewage Disposal Sys7�t -• •-•-•'-••-----•---- ------------------------------ ••---•---------------...-- �p�et n-A r s or Lot No. wner ddress a . -------- � Installer Address Q Type of Building Size Lot----------------------------Sq. feet U Dwelling—No. of Bedrooms--------------------------------------------Expansion Attic ( ) Garbage Grinder ( ) aOther—Type of Building ____________________________ No. of persons---------------------------- Showers ( ) — Cafeteria Q' Other fixtures -----_______------------------------------------------ W Design Flow......... ...........................gallons per person per day. Total daily flow-----------------------------------------._.gallons. WSeptic Tank—Liquid capacity------------gallons Length................ Width................ __........ Diameter _------..__-_ Depth._ _ _... ---.- . x Disposal Trench—No- -------------------- Width-------------------- Total Length-------------------- Total leaching area----------.---------sq. ft. Seepage Pit No..................... Diameter-------------------- Depth below inlet.................... Total leaching area------------------scl. ft. z Other Distribution box ( ) Dosing tank ( ) Percolation Test Results Performed bY------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- Date--------.--------------------- --------- Test Pit No. 1----------------minutes per inch Depth of "rest Pit.................... Depth to ground water._.-_.-.-.---.--.--.-.- (X Test Pit No. 2................minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit.................... Depth to ground water_.-.-_..-_-_.--------- Ix -----------------------------------------•---------------------•----.................................................................................... 0 Description of Soil------_--------_----------------_--- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- x5 '.----P 1�Aue L--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- U W ------------- ----a --------------------------------------- -•---•-------------------------------------..------------------------••-•-------------------..-------------------------------------------- U Nature of Repairs or A erations— wer whe ---- -------------------------------- --------------------------- plicable................ -----. - - ------ ' lC -- ---- ". Agreement: , The undersigned agrees to install the aforedescribed Individual Sewage Disposal System in accordance with the provisions of Article XI of the State Sanitary Code—The undersigned further agrees not to place the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance has bWssedthe r d alth.--Signe ----------------------- ------------------------•------- Date ApplicationApproved BY---------- ._-�- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------...----------......-------------- Date Application Disapproved for ae following reasons------------------------•-•-•----•-------------------------------•--••-----------------------•-•----------------- ...................•-•--...-----------------•-----....--------......-----•-•-•-----•--•-•--•-'--•-•-'-......_.....--•-------•----.........--.-------•-----------•-----------------•-•--------------.----- Date Permit No.---e-.j...3...................................... Issued---- `�}���= �Y •.............-............. '-'-'-----_ �.,_�,��,___ ------------- - ------ - Date - ---- ------------ f No. .... .. .... THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS . BOARD OF HEALTH ...... .. .................OF............................I......I-----------­1.1­11................... -for UhiVoiial Works (tonstrurfiniv-P, rrmit Application is hereby made for a Permit to Construct, or Repair an Individua'151-St. Disposal System at C6,11-t----- ...... --------------------------- .....................................................w....................7-------­------------ A or Lot No. ...... ...... ............ ...................................... ................. .................. --------------------------- wner t ddress ..... .... ...... ............................. - - -------------------------------------------------- Installe, Address Type of Building Size Lot............................Sq. feet Dwelling—No. of Bedrooms.............................................Expansion Attic Garbage Grinder PL4 Other—Type of Building ------------................ No. of persons.-______-_--_________-___-__ Showers Cafeteria a4 Other -fixtures ---------- .< ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--------------------------------------------------------------- W_ Design Flow.......j"J9----------------------_I . gallons per person per day. Total daily flow_........................................gallons. P4 Septic Tank—Liquid capacity..............gallons Length________________ Width................ Diameter._..........._._ Deptli..-------------- Disposal Trench—..No-. ."...... --- Width-------------------- Total Length__......._.......... Total leaching area-.------..-_- ......sq. f t. Seepage Pit No..'__-,............. Diameter-_----------------- Depth below inlet.................... Total leaching area------- ..........s(l. f t. ;4 Other Distribution box Dosing tank �_4 Percolation Test Results Performed by.......................................................................... Date--------------'----------------------- ,4 Test Pit No.J--------_------minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit.._..__._._...._.... Depth to ground water..................... rXq Test Pit.No. 2................minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit--------_--------- Depth to ground water--._---.__------.._..--. 1. 0 Description of -.1-1 ............................................................................................................................................................. So�i'l-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I ............................... ........... U ---------- -------------------------------- --------- ......ft............................................... -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------­-------------------------------V-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- U Nature of Repairs or erations—Xwer wheuApplicable.................... ......................................................................... ...........to-.0.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- .......-- -- ---- -- 7----------- Agreement:, The undersigned agrees to install the aforedescribed Individual Sewage Disposal System in accordance with the provisions of Article XI of the State Sanitary Code— The undersigned further agrees not to place the system in operation until a Certificate;of Cornpliame,-..ha:�been * ed by the bg�ardalth,..s. d C;7 Signed... . .............. ... .. ..... ............. ....... . ....................... ................................Date ApplicationApproved BY---- ----- -!_/-4------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --­-------------------I---------------- Date e Application Disapprovd joy following reasons:........................... ....................... 77 T1------------------------------------- .............................. .......3.............................................................. ..................................................... ------ ........................ Date PermitNo........................................................ Issued...................... ................................. Date THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 3. BOARD OF HEALTH 4o.Awe..........OF....... ................................ 1.7 4 r,*6� 4'&rtifiratr of 6,11,11mViiaurr 71#hfAq-&RTA9(Tlrat fl/e/InNOW'Sewage & &dftjstem constructed or Repaired by-------------------------- .........I................................................................ ............................................................................................. --4r 2> at------------------------------------------------------ ..........--------------­--­--------d.........................................................✓............................................. has been installed in accordance with.,the provisions of Article XI of The State Sanitary Code as described in the application for_DisxaI�Xj�Constrt�'tioaJ�Ermit .....In— dated------------------------------------------------ ­'+". 4�D ;�h T49,4 U',10ERTIFICATE ',�SNALI,'�NOT 1 0(*' A GUARANTEE THAT THE SYSTEfiArLrA k( !,j'FfM .."ILL TUNCT ON DATE Inspector----_-------­-­- ............................................................... ------------------.............................................. q THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH ,",'iA O&A., 03 ..........................................OF................................................................................... No......................... FEE................... Permissionis hereby gra*d........... .............................................................. .................................................................... to Constro jof ItepairA V) an Individual Sewage Disposal System atNo........................................ .......................................................................*,F,63------------------------- ?!V............... ..Street V(" as sW6 '.on the a N, wn, application for Disposal Works Con�jrl� :�......................... ............................ ........................................ ...i'o'a'r"d' of He th DATE.......................................... ......a.,--....... FORM 1255 HoeBS & WARREN��j Rbiiii*I.SHERS MARSTONS REFERENCE MIIJ S.�4 MA -BARNSTABLE GIS MAP 103 PARCEL 109002 - PLAN TRIED 'PLAN OF LAND AT MARSTONS MILLS. BARNSTABLE. DATED 1/23/53.ADDITION VIQ53.PREPARED BY T.H.5TEGMAIER CIVIL ENGINEER.PLAN BOOK 425 PAGE 80 NOTE: THI5 SRE PLAN WAS NOT PREPARED FROM ANY INSTRUMENT SURVEY AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD THE DISTANCES. BEARING AND/OR OTHER FEATURES SHOWN BE L15ED TO ESTABU511 PROPERTY LINES. KEY MAP 4 J LEGEND HB HAND BORING -ijo.TB TEST BORING ro ro A MW MONRORING WELL � P - O Li 11 it GARAGE I TB-I/MW ZONE B I DWEWNG HB 1 Q SEE DETAIL I GARAGE FORMER / \ ZONE A 330IGAULON`, $ AST H13-2 LOCUS H I I(((III \\ 150 WHEELER ROAD I111 MIDDLE POND \\ 11 IIII \\ I� 1� TB-2MIW--2 1 AREA OF E10.33ING 9WAVATION DER UN1 M REMOVAL ACTION) AR4400 MAIWI I fY x I a x'7-M RTN#4-24112 TB- AREA OP EXCAVAIXN(UNDER V x 13'(DJ RICK AND BETTY ANN WHEELER APPRO)OMATELY 12'x 2 RELEASE ABATEMENT 3 L') do DOUG BEAN,CARETAKER 130 WHEELER ROAD-MARSTONS M=%MAW" RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE COMPLETIO AREA of CLAW A-2 CLASS A-2 RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME RESPONSE ACTIONOUra)ME I50WM9UMROAD-MARMONSM JAMAWO 11ZiN 4-241 21 BENNETT ENvmoNMENTAL s>r ASSOCIATES, INc. w' 51TE PLAN - D RM PROFWMOXAlA EN141RO MMUAL SCMW I% DETAIL 0 100 200 300 1573 MAW ffrRHffr.Y.O 1743,BREWSrOkMA02361 POMMOM8961706 v bmama FAX OM W"100 Sr"I'-5' SCALE I'-IOO' Dom 8C,A18 HY Q )OBIiUNWR 10/03n2 As Noled SRF YrW BEA12-10441 i, I REFERENCE MARSTON3 NDLLS, �� MA -BARNSTABLE G15 MAP 103 PARCEL 109002 -PLAN TMED 'PLAN OF LAND AT MAR5TON5 MILLS. BARN5TABLL. DATED 1/23153.ADDITION5 3/1 G/53,PREPARED BY T.H.5TEGMAER CIVIL ENGINEER.PLAN BOOK 425 PAGE.80 1 reed. NOTE: THIS SITE PLAN WAS NOT PREPARED FROM ANY INSTRUMENT SURVEY AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD THE DISTANCES, BEARING AND/OR OTHER FEATURES SHOWN BE USED TO ESTABLISH PROPERTY LINES. -------- KEY MAP LEGEND HB HAND BORING TB TEST BORING 2�MW MONITORING WELL P GARAGE = DWELLING TB-IAM--I Q SEE DETAIL HB-1 =_ p FORMER 330-GALLON`,11— h a`'T LOCU5 H 2 — \\ 150 WHEELER ROAD — — MIDDLE HB-S _ POND TB-7JMW 2 AREA US� noMI LVALAcnopo RTN#4-24112 APPR010MATMY 25'x 10 x VP TB 3 RICK AND BETTY ANN WHEELER c%DOUG BEAN,CARETAKER ISO WHMRM ROAD-MARMPONS MILLS.MA 02M Tidw RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE PLAN 150 WHEELER ROAD-MARSI SONS IK LLS.MACM418 DER. of PROPOSED ENT MtA5U BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL (UNDER RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE) AI'PRMMATM?30 x 20'x I OT) lei A$SOCIA 1 Es, INC. SITE PLAN LICENSED SrrE MOFB9SLONAI 9.SNVIILONbUMAL SCIE19TIS 5. DETAIL 0 100 200 300 1573 MAIN STREE'r,P.O.BIOX 1�BREWSTER.MA02361 - POGM(SM M6-1706 wwo mmfb ® FAS(SM M"10 SCALE 1%-& SCALP V—I OD DATE SCALE BY CSC[ MB NWMM OV09/12 AsNobed SRF ]TVV BRAM10441