Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1165 MAIN ST./RTE 6A(W.BARN.) - Health 1165 Main Street Posy ► Q West Barnstable A—�178=004 1 I ;.t No� 9� THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD F H AL.TH � .,,�r'y TO APPROVAL O� t ...........OF........ . .. .. .:: : I DYABLE CONSERVATION ISSION Appliration for Dispntittl Works TonstrnailC0�an "mit Application is hereby made for a Permit to Construe ( or Repair ( ) an Individual Sewage Disposal System/at• 1 1/�1iL�7 ' f Lo tion-Ad ens ._ / fir ...: .�-----•.jea��.& .�w.� AOwner W �... ......... .. ..-X... .-T....... .................... F.i ....,�L.. ...... . ........... � Installer Address UType of Building ���/// Size Lot............................Sq. feet Dwellings No. of Bedrooms,,, -------...................Expansion Attic ( ) Garbage Grinder ( ) pa, ' Other Type of Building .. No. of persons---------------------------- Showers ( ) — Cafeteria ( ) a' Other. fix res ................ WW Design Flow►�� .. a Total daily flow-_......e .Qf�........................gallons. WSeptic Tank Liquid capacity/..gallons Length................ Width................ Diameter._----__----_ Depth................ x Disposal Trench—No._y............... Width.................... Total Length.....................Total leaching area....................sq. ft. Seepage Pit No..................... Diameter.................... Depth below in��j�et_--`` . ......_... Total,le�a hing area..................sq. ft. z Other Distribution box ( ) Dosing tank Percolation Test Results Performed by.......................................................................... Date........................................ Test Pit No. 1................minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit.................... Depth to ground water•-_-_.---_---.--_----_ f� Test Pit No. 2................minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit.................... Depth to ground water........................ -------- O De p ' n of S --...j.. ...P `� t l.''L!n+. -- �..... � � �'�'r-� ---.. U1 °`f�1' � ;� ----i:o• -$.Y�s d -�C 9�-✓/1-� +..... W .....................................ff................................ UNature of Rep ' s or Alteratio _ "FF a ,e�y,-. _ y ........ _.. .. _..._ - Agreeme t: The undersigned agrees to install the aforedescribed Individual Sewage Disposal System in accordance with the provisions of TITLE 5 of the State Sanitary Code— The undersigned further agrees not to place the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance has a iss d�y t o rd of health. q Sig ....W......... .... ....................................... hT.. Application Approved BY ... ------------------ --- Date Application Disapproved for the following reasons------------------------ ------- -----------•-----••----------•-•----------------------•------•-------- ------•••-----------•----•-•-----------------------------------------------•------•--•••••--•-----------•........--------------•-----•-------•----•--------•---•••-•••---•-•-------•----•---------------- Date PermitNo......................................................... Issued-....................................................... Date - THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD O HEALTH .......� ..........OF......... ............................... Tatifiratr of Tomplittnrr T IS ER Y, That the Individual Sewage Disposal System constructed (�') or Repaired ( ) by !-'''•...... .. •---.....---- ..----.... ---------------- .. . . '�t - Snsta I has been installed in acco?dance with the provisions of 5 of The State Sanitary Code as described in the, . application for Disposal Works Construction Permit N ._._.. ......e.ly............. dated-..... -� .- AFO_......_.__._- THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE THAT THE SYSTEM WILL FUNCTION SATISFACTORY. DATE................................................................................ Inspector.................................................................................... NO& 131 Fss.. . THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD E HE LTH ......OF......... . .. a ..... Ap# iration for EUVasal Workii Tnniirnr#inn ramit Application is hereby made for a Permit to Construct -( ) or Repair ( ) an Individual Sewage Disposal System at: .� .�-...�. ..-.�., ... Location-Ad - ss - ad �, L°t . � ............................. Owner Address W ,. � - ........ ------------- -----------------------•------- Ins alley_... -;- Address UType of Building Size Lot............................Sq. feet Dwellings No. of Bedrooms............................................Expansion Attic ( ) Garbage Grinder ( ) Other T e of Building .............. No. of ersons.-.------._---.-•--.--_-___- Showers a YP g -----•---•---- P ( ) — Cafeteria ( ) Otherfix -res :...---------------------------------------------------•---------•--.......------•............._... W Design Flo ��ff r , A� Total daily flow........'Z �10.?....................gallons. WSeptic Tank J Liquid capacityA .gallons Length................ Width................. Diameter................ Depth................ x Disposal Trench—No.—I-------------- Width.................... Total Length....................;Total leaching area....................sq. ft. Seepage Pit No____________________ Diameter-------------....... Depth below t. _'.~.-__ _'_Total lea ing area..................sq. ft. Z Other Distribution box ( ) Dosing tank • aPercolation Test Results Performed b ........................................................................... Date.,....................................... Test Pit No. I................minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit---_................ Depth to ground water........................ 44 Test Pit No. 2...:............minutes per inch Depth of Test Pit.................... Depth to ground water........................ w �� , J�•. Q �rOD � of So j 7 ....-•-• ...................................... tw U Nature of Repa' or Alteration @ '�"�4��,/-- -- .. - .. .e��__ .. . -- . . -- J. Agreemelftf. The undersigned agrees to install the.aforedescribed Individual Sewage Disposal System in accordance with the provisions of TITILE .5 of the State Sanitary Code''- The undersigned further agrees not.to place the system in operation until a Certificate of Compliance has iss d th d of health. Sign ...... .... ....................................... � :. Date Application Approved By.......- = G�/�/1_ . ....................... ....7-A-1� ... .............. Date Application Disapproved for the following reasons: -------•--- ---------- ----------------•------•--••--------..............--------......----------------._......_...----------------------------------------------------•------------------------.....-- Date PermitNo......................................................... Issued.................................................... Date THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BOARD O HEALTH �(,1 /I........OF........ .............................................. I , C�rr��firtt�r ,a� f�unt��i�nr�e T IS ERT , That the Individual Sewage Disposal System constructed ( r Repaired ( ) by - � ` "'"' ................. Ins�taley • r at__...` t �- a )dam- z `` > f `..... /• d !1�'f --------- has been installed in acco�e with the provisions of j of The State Sanitary Code as described in the application for Disposal Works Construction Permit Nc . ....... _i / - _...�` ------------- - ------------ dated.------ .� THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CERTIFICATE SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE THAT THE SYSTEM WILL FUNCTION SATISFACTORY. DATE................................................................................ Inspector.................................................................................... THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ` BOARD HEALTH ......... 141>1...........OF........ . ...a.4eo.................................................... No......................... FEE....`� ............... Map IV 5 otrurtion Upamit Permission k* >mby granted-•--- t ` ................................................................................... to Cons uctnn( 'Vjr R2$air ( 9f an In 'vidual Sewage osal S stem ,,at No.. ..E�--r.... �r._lr ... ? -lZ --" ,/�',r" �lL,trf.•so a ..................................... Street as shown on-the application for Disposal Works Construction P r t No---_ Dated..__ ` ? " y' /® �.fd I Board of Healt / DATE -'�-------------------------•---•---------------•--•---.....---- FORM 1255 HOBBS & WARREN. INC., PUBLISHERS L 0 C A'T ION SEWAGE PERMIT N0. - -- VILLAGE' - AAJA LI s15. INST,A, LLER'S NAME i ADDRESS M 6UILDEIt OR OWNER DATE PERMIT ISSUED JL DATE COMPLIANCE ISSUED C�7CPLr/'{' 8AAfifae I 1 4= t EDWARD E. KELLEY REG. LAND SURVEYOR CUMMAQUID, MASS. 02637 TEL : (617) 362-2266 January 8 , 1986 Town of Barnstable Board of Health Hyannis,Mass. REF: 1095 Main Street ,West Barnstable #85-309 The leach area was inspected as requested by the installer to verify the suitability of the soil . 0n inspection it was found that no impervios material existed in the leach area and four feet below. There was more than three feet of stone put around the leach pit . ' r H 0f Afgsfy EDARD J Reg.Profe nal -Land - � rveyor KELLEY 9 No. 26100 �cQL L6+ ��'� Y FILL �OSL' �/(�.j�.,�lG,'�► �"� � � - yof'laero� �1V1v�. 1/ BARa9TABL t639. ,� a�2de�2�aa�2a�2�u��ta�2 u, MAYk t P. O. BOX 36B 'HYANNIS, MASSACHUSETTS 02601 April 25, 1979 Mr. John N. Reilly 1 Independence Lane Chatham, Mass. 02633 Re: West Barnstable Post Office Building - Wetlands Violation Dear Mr. Reilly; The Barnstable Conservation Commission has reviewed your case, and is unanimously of the opinion that a filing will have to be made on the work already commenced at Lot #3 White Cap Lane, West Barnstable. The Commission is aware that you are under contract constraints to complete your project. The Wetland Protection Statute, M.G.L. Ch 131 sec 40, is quite clear, however. If you are working within an area subject to the Act, you must file a Notice of Intent with, and receive an Order of Condition from the Conservation Commission. In your particular case, although the area on which you are working is classified as a wetland and bordering a wetland, no filing was made before construction started. This is a violation of the Act, and could be prosecuted either civilly or criminally. The Barnstable Conservation Commission has always pre- ferred to allow the owner to .file after the fact, because problems tend to be resolved more quickly this way than if the Commission were to prosecute. The time savings is an advantage, primarily to the applicant. Your filing should include complete information on pervious and impervious surfacing for vehicular use areas, drainage plan and calculations, soils, groundwater, septic system, building location, landscaping, and road profiles. If you are planning on tapping some of the drainage into the existing pipe, there should be information on its carrying capacity, present amount of that capacity which is utilized, and the amount to be used by your project. You should also discuss compensatory flood storage for that part of the lowland and/or wetland you intend to fill. For your future planning, you should be aware that Lot #2, as shown on the plan, is covered with wetlands vegetation. No work of any kind should be e Town of Barnstable Conservation Commission -2- done on that lot without a prior Wetlands Protection Act filing. You may, at your option, include a request for work on that lot in the filing for the Post Office Building. Please be assured that the Commission will do everything in its power to expedite the process,,. once you have filed. The Cease and Desist will remain in effect until an Order of Condition is issued on the project. Sincerely, Arlene M. Wilson Chairman encl: Filing Forms cc: Mr. William Weller Mrs. Louise Day Hicks DEQE, Lakeville Board of Health Building Inspector AMW/dm HARISTAIIL MAM ,� a�de�2�aiarlam�u��i,m w - �o Mar a. P. O. BOX 36B HYANNIS, MASSACHUSETTS 02601 April 25, 1979 Mr. John N. Reilly 1 Independence Lane Chatham, Mass. 02633 Re: West Barnstable Post Office Building - Wetlands Violation Dear Mr. Reilly; The Barnstable Conservation Commission has reviewed your case, and is unanimously of the opinion that a filing will have to be made on the work already commenced at Lot #3 White .Cap Lane, West Barnstable. The Commission is aware that you are under contract constraints to complete your project. The Wetland Protection Statute, M.G.L. Ch 131 sec 40, is quite clear, however. If you are working within an area subject to the Act, you must file a Notice of Intent with, and receive an Order of Condition from the Conservation Commission. In your particular case, although the area on which you are working is classified as a wetland and bordering a wetland, no filing was made before construction started. This is a violation of the Act, and could be prosecuted either civilly or criminally. The Barnstable Conservation Commission has always pre- ferred to allow the owner to .file after the fact, because problems tend to be resolved more quickly this way than if the Commission were to prosecute. The time savings is an advantage, primarily to the applicant. Your filing should include complete information on pervious and impervious surfacing for vehicular use areas, drainage plan and calculations, soils, groundwater, septic system, building location, landscaping, and road profiles. If you are planning on tapping some of the drainage into the existing pipe, there should be information on its carrying capacity, present amount of that capacity which is utilized, and the amount to be used by your project. You should also discuss compensatory flood storage for that part of the lowland and/or wetland you intend to fill. For your future planning, you should be aware that Lot #2, as shown on the plan, is covered with wetlands vegetation. No work of any kind should be e Town of Barnstable Conservation Commission -2- done on that lot without a prior Wetlands Protection Act filing. You may, at your option, include a request for work on that lot in the filing for the Post Office Building. Please .be assured that the Commission will do everything in its power to expedite the process, once you have filed. The Cease and Desist will remain in effect until an Order of Condition is issued on the project. Sincerely, Liles Lim-�''ZJ Arlene M. Wilson Chairman encl: Filing Forms cc: Mr. William Weller _ Mrs. Louise Day Hicks DEQE, Lakeville Board of Health Building Inspector AMW/dm WE ro / ��w PA Besa9Te33L = l (/!i• �m�uiiiL�i�� J/,{(>w 639 F�MAlf , yC�IC P. O. BOX 368 HYANNIS, MASSACHUSETTS 02601 April 25, 1979 Mr. John N. Reilly 1 Independence Lane Chatham, Mass. 02633 Re: West Barnstable Post Office Building - Wetlands Violation Dear Mr. Reilly; The Barnstable Conservation Commission has reviewed your case, and is unanimously of the opinion that a filing will have to be made on the work already commenced at Lot #3 White -Cap Lane, West Barnstable. The Commission is aware that you are under contract constraints to complete your project. The Wetland Protection Statute, M.G.L. Ch 131 sec 40, is quite clear, however. If you are working within an area subject to the Act, you must file a Notice of Intent with, and receive an Order of Condition from the Conservation Commission. In your particular case, although the area on which you are working is classified as a wetland and bordering a wetland, no filing was made before construction started. This is a violation of the Act, and could be prosecuted either civilly or criminally. The Barnstable Conservation Commission has always pre- ferred to allow the owner to .file after the fact, because problems tend to be resolved more quickly this way than if the Commission were to prosecute. The time savings is an advantage, primarily to the applicant. Your filing should include complete information on pervious and impervious surfacing for vehicular use areas, drainage plan and calculations, soils, groundwater, septic system, building location, landscaping, and road profiles. If you are planning on tapping some of the drainage into the existing pipe, there should be information on its carrying capacity, present amount of that capacity which is utilized, and the amount to be used by your project. You should also discuss compensatory flood storage for that part of the lowland and/or wetland you intend to fill. For your future planning, you should be aware that Lot #2, as shown on the plan, is covered with wetlands vegetation. No work of any kind should be r Town of Barnstable Conservation Commission -2- done on that lot without a prior Wetlands Protection Act filing. You may, at your option, include a request for work on that lot in the filing for the Post Office Building. Please .be assured that the Commission will do everything in its power to expedite the process, once you have filed. The Cease and Desist will remain in effect until an Order of Condition is issued on the project. Sincerely, Arlene M. Wilson Chairman encl: Filing Forms cc: Mr. William Weller Mrs. Louise Day Hicks DEQE, Lakeville Board of Health Building Inspector AMW/dm DARNSTAEL = � � U� ` �00 %639 /an `�C�ewwmbeaw OM0 P. O. BOX 368 HYANNIS, MASSACHUSETTS 02601 April 25, 1979 Mr. John N. Reilly 1 Independence Lane Chatham, Mass. 02633 Re: West Barnstable Post Office Building - Wetlands Violation Dear Mr. Reilly; The Barnstable Conservation Commission has reviewed your case, and is unanimously of the opinion that a filing will have to be made on the work already commenced at Lot #3 White .Cap Lane, West Barnstable. The Commission is aware that you are under contract constraints to complete your project. The Wetland Protection Statute, M.G.L. Ch 131 sec 40, is quite clear, however. If you are working within an area subject to the Act, you must file a Notice of Intent with, and receive an Order of Condition from the Conservation Commission. In your particular case, although the area on which you are working is classified as a wetland and bordering a wetland, no filing was made before construction started. This is a violation of the Act, and could be prosecuted either civilly or criminally. The Barnstable Conservation Commission has always pre- ferred to allow the owner to .file after the fact, because problems tend to be resolved more quickly this way than if the Commission were to prosecute. The time savings is an advantage, primarily to the applicant. Your filing should include complete information on pervious and impervious surfacing for vehicular use areas, drainage plan and calculations, soils, groundwater, septic system, building location, landscaping, and road profiles. If you are planning on tapping some of the drainage into the existing pipe, there should be information on its carrying capacity, present amount of that capacity which is utilized, and the amount to be used by your project. You should also discuss compensatory flood storage for that part of the lowland and/or wetland you intend to fill. For your future planning, you should be aware that Lot #2, as shown on the plan, is covered with wetlands vegetation. No work of any kind should be Town of Barnstable Conservation Commission -2- done on that lot without a prior Wetlands Protection Act filing. You may, at your option, include a request for work on that lot in the filing for the Post Office Building. Please be assured that the Commission will do everything in its power to expedite the process, once you have filed. The Cease and Desist will remain in effect until an Order of Condition is issued on the project. Sincerely, Arlene M. Wilson Chairman encl: Filing Forms cc: Mr. William Weller Mrs. Louise Day Hicks DEQE, Lakeville Board of Health Building Inspector AMW/dm aS , REC � EIVED BARNSTABLE CONSERVATION.. N ALD i M S Z0IRG / WILLIA 5:OiNO COI MISSION JOSE►N D GUERTIN JR JONN F.A"" ' JONN►SULLWAN WALTER E JAWORSRI CONSULTANT ��C/L CCX Ey T/L NTS JUL• 2 4 1979; OOLOSERO - ZOINO• OUNNICLIFF CEnk ASSOCIATES, INC. July 23, 1979 File No. A-2415 Ms. Arlene Wilson Barnstable Conservation Commission P. O. Box 368 Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 Re : West Barnstable Post Office Septic System Dear Ms. Wilson: This 'letter presents our conclusions concerning the proper functioning of an on-site sewage disposal system at the West Barnstable Post Office. It is our understanding that the system, which is already installed but not yet operational , is intended to accept an estimated waste- water volume of 210 gallons per day (gpd) from the post office building. An additional , but unspecified, wastewater load will be added in the future if a second building (located nearby on thick clay strata) is permitted to tie into the post office system. h i FIELD EXPLORATION On July 11, 1979 Mr. Cadwgan of Goldberg, Zoino, Dunnicliff and Associates, Inc. (GZD) examined four test pits being excavated under the direction of the applicant 's engineer. GZD logged and sampled strata in these test pits, which were located within 75 feet of the north, east , and west sides of the new West Barnstable Post Office building. Three test pits were about 12 feet deep, while the test pit on the west side adjacent to the wastewater disposal system was only about six feet deep. Logs of the strata encountered in each test pit are attached as Appendix A. All test pits were excavated to sufficient depth to encounter groundwater, but the water levels shown on the logs may not be static water levels. In addition to the examination of test pits, GZD performed a walk- over site reconnaissance, and measured the water level in the well drilled for the post office. This newly-installed well , located about 125 feet northeast of the building, is reported to be over 40 feet deep. The water level in this well (11 feet) more accurately reflects the static (equilibrium) level of the regional water table or piezometric surface and is not necessarily reflective of the local hydrologic conditions observed in the shallow test pits. 30 TOWER ROAD • NEWTON UPPER FALLS • MASS. 02164 • 6'17—244-4100 i Ms. Arlene Wilson July 23, 1979 File No. A-2415 Page Two GEOLOGIC STRATA Sedimentary strata exposed in the test pits are dominantly fine grained, glacially derived units that accumulated north of the Sandwich Moraine. In general , beds consist of fine sand, silty sand, or sandy/silty clay. Although the bottom of these fine grained deposits was not reached in the test pits, they may be expected to overlie coarser er materials or moraine deposits. Test pits 1 and 2 show a sand-clay-sand-silt/clay sequence, while test pits 3 and 4 revealed 5 to 7 feet of soil and sand over silt and clay. The deeper sand layer in the former test pits is only 1 to 12 feet thick, and may not be continuous across the site. It should be noted that in a sequence involving both sand and silt/clay, seepage into the pits may be from perched water tables. HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS OF LEACHING FIELD AREA The suitability of a site for an on-site disposal system depends to a large part on the nature of the underlying materials. Without direct permeability measurements, an indicator of the material 's ability to accept effluent is its grain size distribution. Grain size plots are included as Appendix B. Of particular interest is the material underlying the leaching field. Test pit 2 was excavated west of the Ameration chamber, and is the best available data concerning the material underlying this area. This test pit revealed that the gravel infiltration bed was under- lain by about 8 inches of natural sand. Under the sand was about 10 inches of silt and clay. Our experience with similar material occurring under the so-called 1776 land suggests this silt and 'clay is essentially impermeable. Between this silt and clay and the silty clay observed in the bottom of the test pit was 14 inches of a relatively permeable, but possibly discontinuous, sand referred to above. A percolation test conducted on July 11, 1979 in the fine sand unit overlying the clay resulted in a percolation rate of 15. 5 minutes/ 3 inches or about 5 min/inch. A laboratory gradation analysis (Appendix B) was performed on a sample of this same sand unit . Using empirical relationships which have been developed to relate permeability to both the D10 size of a sand and the percolation rate, we have estimated the permeability of the fine sand to be about 10 feet/day (75 gal/day)ft2 ) . Neither of the methods is [ffj0TEC>-1NV_AL CXDNEXXTANTS Ms. Arlene Wilson July 23, 1979 File No. A-2415 Page Three 100% conclusive and the figure of 10 ft/day must be considered to be approximate. FUNCTIONING OF THE SEPTIC SYSTEM In determining the hydrologic suitability of a site for a septic system leaching field, two factors must be taken into account ; they are: (1) the permeability of the underlying material and (2) the elevation of the seasonal high water table. The ability of the site to accept discharge was estimated by use of Darcy 's equation. The results of this study indicate that during periods when the fine sand unit is not saturated (as was the condition on July 11, 1979) , the system as designed can accept up- wards of 500 gpd. If, however, we were to assume that during periods of seasonal high groundwater the gravel within the chambers was to become saturated (with perched groundwater) , the capacity of the system would decrease to somewhat less than 200 gpd. From the results of this study we have concluded that the site is marginally suitable for the design capacity of 210 gpd. RECOMMENDATIONS Because the leaching field site is marginal, we are recommending an additional field test . This test would consist of pumping about 400 gallons of clean water into the system. This could be accom- plished with a garden hose flow over a period of about one hour with the water being supplied by a portable pump from the on-site well . Such a large scale test would greatly substantiate the acceptability of the site with a fluid which is not offensive should a failure occur. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The leaching field of the I'lest Barnstable Post Office septic system overlies a thin layer of sand, and deeper vertical percolation is prohibited by the presence of an underlying silt and clay layer. 2. The leaching field apparently does not meet the requirements of section 3.6 of Title V of the State Environmental Code, which requires a minimum thickness of four feet of permeable material between the bottom of the leaching field and an imper- meable layer. WGE=�C>-NCAL TAt-TM TEST PIT FIELD LOG GOLDBERG,ZOINO,DUNNICLIFF 8 PROJECT New TEST PIT No. 1 ASSOCIATES,INC. DESCRIPTION W.Barnstable Post Offic FILE No. A-2415 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS LOCATION ± 100' from NE corner of P.0 DATE July 11, 1979 EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT GZD ENGINEER R.M.Cadwgan CONTRACTOR -- GROUND ELEV. OPERATOR TIME STARTED 2:30 p.m. WEATHER MAKE John Peere MODEL Backhoe TIME COMPLETED 2_45 p.m. CAPACITY REACH 12 ft SOIL -DESCRIPTION BOULDER DEPTH EXCAV. COUNT REMARK 0 EFFORT OTY. CLASS. No. Brown, pebbly SILT, powdery, soil A-horizon, woody roots and grass root mat. 11 Yellow-brown, fine SAND, some Silt, trace medium Sand, 2� trace- pebbles. Few fine roots, decreasing downward. Much denser 3 Mottled yellow-brown and gray fine SAND, little Silt, trace Clay; few brown and gray Clayey Silt and stiff 4� Clay lenses or balls 2" x 8". 5' Stiff brown and gray, mottled, dessicated Silty CLAY, 6' trace to little fine to medium Sand, trace- Gravel in top 12". 7 Red-brown. fine to medium SAND and GRAVEL, few cobbles 8, to six inches. 9' 30 min. 1 0 Gray, fine SAND, some Silt, little Clay. 10 2 III 12� BOTTOM OF TEST PIT - 12' 13� 14' REMARKS : 1. Strong seepage at 9 - 11 feet. 2. Test pit walls collapsed below 9' , could not be examined. . TEST PIT PLAN LEGEND: I PROPORTIONS ( ABBREVIATIONS( EXCAVATION ��— --� BOULDER COUNT USED I F-FINE EFFORT M- MEDIUM E SIZE RANGE LETTER ITRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% C- COARSE EASY CLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION I F/M-FINE TO MEDIUM M MODERATE O Q"_Is _ A I LITTLE(LI.) 10 - 20% ( F/C-FINE TO COARSE I D DIFFICULT GROUNDWATER V- VERY NORTH IS"-36" B SOME (SO.) 20-35% I GR.-GRAY (ELAPSED 36"AND LARGER C J AND 35-50% ( BN.-BROWN READIME NG TG w L VOLUME = ctLyd. YEL.- YELLOW (HRS.) — TEST PIT FIELD LOG GOLDBERG,ZOINO, DUNNICLIFF 9 PROJECT New TEST PIT No. 2 ASSOCIATES,INC. DESCRIPTION W.Barnstable Post Office FILE No. A-2415 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS LOCATION Ameration Chamber DATE July 11. 1979 R.M.Cadwgan EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT GROUND ELEV. GZD ENGINEER CONTRACTOR OPERATOR TIME STARTED WEATHER MAKE JQbn Deere MODEL Backhoe TIME COMPLETED - CAPACITY REACH 12 it DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV. BOULDER REMARK 0 EFFORT OTY. CLASS. No. 0-1.5' - Concrete Chamber, with Gravel infiltration 1, bed of about 1.5' thickness on undisturbed soil 1 2 2' Pale yellow, fine SAND, little- medium Sand, becoming \Silty with trace Clay lumps at 2' . 3� Stiff, gray SILT and CLAY. Bed dips north and may thicken that way, becomes Silty Clay at bottom. 4' Prominantly cross bedded yellow and oxidized reddish brown, fine to medium SAND, litt e+ 5� medium to coarse Sand. Trace pebbles. 6' 7' Ltrace irm, brown, slightly Silty CLAY,. ery fine Sand, slightly plastic 5 to 6' . 3 8� Bottom of test pit - 6. 9 12� 13' 14' REMARKS : 1. Zero feet corresponds to top of concrete Ameration chamber. 2. Lumps are transported clay balls. 3. Slow seepage at 6.01 . TEST PIT PLAN LEGEND: . .PROPORTIONS , I ABBREVIATIONS I EXCAVATION BOULDER COUNT USED ( F -FINE EFFORT M- MEDIUM I E EASY SIZE RANGE LETTER ITRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% C- COARSE CLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION I F/M-FINE TO MEDIUM M MODERATE O Q"_18" - A (LITTLE(LI.) 10- 20 a F/C-FINE TO COARSE D DIFFICULT GROUNDWATER V- VERY NORTH 18"-36" B SOME (SQ) 20-3S% I GR.-GRAY JELAPSED 36'�AND LARGER C J AND 35-50% BN.-BROWN TREADIME NG '�G.W.L VOLUME = Cu.yd. YEL.- YELLOW (HRS.) — TEST PIT FIELD LOG GOLDBERG,ZOINO, DUNNICLIFF 8 PROJECT New TEST PIT No. 3 ASSOCIATES,INC. DESCRIPTION W.Barnstable Post Office FILE No. A-2415 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS LOCATION Between P.O. S water well DATE July 11. 1929 GZD ENGINEER R.M.Cadwgan EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT CONTRACTOR GROUND ELEV. OPERATOR TIME STARTED WEATHER MAKE John Deere MODEL Backhoe CAPACITY 1/4 Cu.vd. REACH 12 tt TIME COMPLETED — DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV. BCOUNTR REMARK 0 EFFORT QTY, CLASS. No. Black-dark brown Clayey Organic Topsoil. 28 Medium fine SAND, trace Gravel, little+ Silt, few 3' balls of Clay. 4� 5' 61 Gray and reddish brown SILT and CLAY, mottled. 7� 8� 1 9, Gray SILT. 10' 11' Bottom of test pit - :Z-'11 12� 13� 14' REMARKS : 1. Seepage at 8.2' TEST PIT PLAN LEGEND: I PROPORTIONS 1 ABBREVIATIONS( EXCAVATION �k-- -� BOULDER COUNT USED ( M- FINE EFFORT I SIZE RANGE LETTER ITRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% I C- COARSE E EASY CLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION I F/M-FINE TO MEDIUM M MODERATE " " LITTLE(LI.) 10-20% D DIFFICULT 0 s -le _ a I I F/c-FINE To COARSE (GROUNDWATER V- VERY NORTH 18"-36" B I SOME (SQ) 20-35% i GR.-GRAY (ELAPSED 38��AND LARGER C ( AND 35-50% ( BN.-BROWN (READING G.W.L VOLUME = Cu.yd. YEL.- YELLOW (HRS.) — TEST PIT FIELD LOG GOLDBERG,ZOINO, DUNNICLIFF a PROJECT New TEST PIT No. 4 ASSOCIATES,INC. DESCRIPTION W.Barnstable Post Offic FILE No. A-2415 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS LOCATION 50' N. of P.O. front door DATE July 11, 1979 EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT GROUND ELEV. GZD ENGINEER R.M.Cadwf�an CONTRACTOR OPERATOR TIME STARTED WEATHER MAKE John Deere MODEL Bac hoe TIME COMPLETED 5:15 p.m. CAPACITY REACH 19 it-BOULDER MARK DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION COUNT EFFORT CITY. CLASS. No. 0 SILT A-Horizon -- Dark brown SILT and SAND, many roots. 1� and SAND 2' FINE B-Horizon -- Yellow, fine SAND, little+ Silt, trace SAND Gravel. 3' Yellow and reddish brown fine SAND and SILT, trace+ q' Clay as irregular lumps to 3" x 4". Oxidized zone h2" thick. (Gradational boundary) 5 Strongly mottled, red and gray SILT and fine SAND, 6' little+ Clay, few pebbles top 12". 7' 8' Mottled SILT and CLAY. 9' (Gradational boundary) 10' 40 min. Gray SILT and CLAY. 12' Bottom of test pit - 11.5' 13' 14' REMARKS : 1. Water table 11' below ground level. TEST PIT PLAN LEGEND; I PROPORTIONS ( ABBREVIATIONSI EXCAVATION I�-- BOULDER COUNT F -FINE EFFORT I M- MEDIUM I E EASY SIZE RANGE LETTER TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% C- COARSE CLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION' I F/M-FINE TO MEDIUM M MODERATE tt LITTLE(L1.) 10- 200 D DIFFICULT O 6"-I8° A 1 I F/C-FINE TO COARSE 1GROUNDWATER 18"-36" 8 SOME (SQ) 20-35% I V- VERY NORTH GR.-GRAY JELAPSED VOLUME = 36"AND LARGER C J AND 35-50% ( BEL.BYELLOW (READING G.W.L (HRS.) APPENDIX B GRADATION TEST c orEcF-ivc4i- TAN- s U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE Z r- 100 2 IN. i IN.3/41N.1/2IN. NO.4 NO.10 NO.20 NO.40 N0.60 N0.100 NO.200 Cm I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I � � I I I I I I I I I I D 90 I I -Z-I �0 I I I I I I I ( I I ZQ 80 I I I I I I I I I G)� I I I I I I I I I I me f I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 0Z rn 11 Z M 00 0 = r rn I I I I I I I I I I Z -n Zi 60 i I I I t I I 1 rD rn 50 rn N Z (A 1 I I I I I 00 I I I I i I I Z 0 � 40 I I rn D ZN 30 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20 I i I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I :0 -IacnW _-�-1 C) cn 10 I I I I I I 1 I I =r- 41 I I I I rn rnZ D a 0 - 1 I I I I I I I iL 70 0 p 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 D y Id GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS a0 1 0 COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY ,%j COARSE FINE COARSET MEDIUM FINE Z ftj ►H UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM �n c� -1 O Z-i ON m x TEST SYM. MATERIAL SOURCE REMARKS F ' rn m N S1.1 Test Pit 2 Brown fine to medium SAND with c4 �� y Sample 1 10-15% nonplastic fines (SM) . rn Depth 18"-20" cn N V �D j � /( ��� I O C AT ION f y_�.t E PEOVIT q 0. VILLAGE _ . 10ST,A LLER'S WADE L ADDRESS G U I L D E R OR OVfJ ER DATE PEAMIT ISSUED DATE COMPLIANCE ISSUED ' �z . U Av 72 r4 4 APPENDIX A TEST PIT FIELD LOGS IffGAECOTTEEAD-f TAMM Ms . Arlene Wilson July 23, 1979 File No. A-2415 Page Four 3. The thin sand layer may or may not have sufficient permeability to handle 210 gpd. 4. Although there is no spring water level data available to us at this time, we suspect that during wet periods the thin . sand layer is fully or partially saturated by water perched on the upper clay layer. 5. It is our opinion that the septic system already installed will marginally handle the 210 gpd, and that disposing of additional effluent through this system could result in at least seasonal failures . 6 . Because of the limited size of the system (suitable only for a one bedroom home) , a full scale test can be readily per- formed at a modest cost . In light of the marginal suitability of the system we are recommending such a test . Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions on this matter. Very truly yours, L rence Feldman John E. Ayre LF/JEA:crp qjOGEC=�M.!D-91Q� TAtgM y cir� -Ocrq NORTH \ A. IS; r O ,3m1 %' // / MOAT OCUS MAP 2 L F �A JOV IL-floof \ / 1 ,� •, �,�� NA$$ACHUSETTS m WALL me ♦ 3 0 , ; 3 / toSIMA."INI __ ct 41Y T/IK — �� 1 / \� \ pw�q 1 F CE 100, _\ \ /" �museum eW drvMM I BOB SITE PLAN \\�y �%`�' 1--40'-0" ; IC 110, / i E `�. / LfiLg= V Ails - l0w.ItV i REMOVE EXIST.CONIC STAIR/LANDING REMOVE EXIST DOOR,FRAME,HARDWARE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT DIG SAFE A d STEEL HANDRAILS It TRIM-INFILL OPENING 1-800-922-4455 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE REMOVE EXIST.CONCRETE WALK OF ANY EXCAVATION. D REMOVE EXIST FENCE d GATE BG.LAROS TO BE REMOVED -n PATCH d REPAIR GYP BD IN THIS ROOM. -PROVIDE NEW STOCKADE REMOVE EXIST NO WALL PROTECTION FENCE V GATE HT T STYLE II BOARDS.-PROVIDE}"PLYWOOD o REMOVE EXIST LT FlXT d PUSH i / PROTECTION TO 40'A.F.F.ON ALL WALLS TO MATCH EXIST BUTTON-RETAIN FOR PUSH II -PAINT TO MATCH EXIST TRIM No 6302 SAWCUT EXIST BIT PVMT d �Rilr2, Iii ` WESTPORT,' MASSACHUSETTS REMOVE-PROVIDE N III uI BIT PAVEMENT \� II III CEDAR SHINGLES TO MATCH EXIST ❑ \` as rn• II'III��III��IIIIII'�'-- C1 in '`^' T P g 9�m REMOVE EXIST DOOR.MODIFY Wr}LL REMOVE ET057 LT FIX d RETAIN ® \ -oo i '. I �.. .. FRAMING PROVDE 2-2%HEADER d FOR RE-USE L. II a THAT SER S EXIERIO CK _a c N3om _ --i PROVIDE 3'-0'X 6'-8'DOOR REMOVE EXIST.O.H. '.i \��. II DOOR d PROVIDE 9'W X \ _ r� § EL:98'-7}'' REMOVE EAST.WD.STAIR d t / LI(N75 V TJ Tn TH O.H.SECTIONAL I III i GUARD RAIL DOOR G i III Y EL 100'-0' / JREOVE E%IST DOOR- 0 0 z i4 VIDE NEW S-O'. ❑ CI � `--- -- - 99'-11}' - Ijr--- ,o' 'DOOR u EL 98'-fl16' � B I I III EL 99-111' �EL 97-2' • - � 'H'N .. _W___ a 50CATE0-WIRE TOEXIST LFT TO BEIT BELLEL 99'-16• REMOVED BY USPS i I T STOCIGADE FENCEPRIOR TO PAD IU w oLL91-7W C1 .. DEMO d T GATEEL 9Y-2 Y.' RE-INSTALLED BY EL 98'-636• LISPS AFTER PAD RO RAIL [„4 EL.9T-114' CONST EC�' ETOST.'EL1:0' : CTR BOLLARD ON,90E OF..: :9Y_1 TYP,.., f T T ..C "'RANI 1_0•. " �EL 97'-O�' 1 P SAWCUT EXIST BIT PVMT d REMOVE- REMOVE EXIST CONIC PAD d BOLLARDS-PROVIDE NEW CONIC r -, PROVIDE NEW SIT PAVEMENT-DEPTH OF PAD d RE-INSTALL EXIST BOLLARDS-ELEV OF NEW PAD 70 CONCRETE RAMP,SEE � SUB-BASE d THICKNESS OF BASE AND PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN MATCH SURROUNONC PAVEMENT-PROVIDE ANCHOR BOLTS FOR CONCRETE RAMP/LANDING SEE GALVANIZED STEEL GUARD EXIST.LOADING DOCK OUTLINE OF EXIST CONIC PAD TO DETAIL 4 WEAR COURSES TO MATCH EXIST LIFT OF SAME SIZE,SPACING d LOCATION AS THOSE THAT EXIST DETAIL 4 /HAND RAIL BE REMOVED d REPLACED ELEVATION AT RAMP 1/a"=1'0" LOADING DOCK Q ELEVATION AT RAMP 4k'vIF 3 T/a"=1'-0" (BEYOND) 4'MAX. 1-0. SAWCUT CONTROL JOINT 5'-0'O.C. 1/4"=i'-0" 1 ]EACH WAY MAX&AS SHOWN �• 31. L a UGHT BROOM FINISH GRADE OR,BIT. 1X2 TRIM(PAINT) 2 '�3 m FRAME ANCHOR 4500 PSI AIR ENTRAINED CONCRETE 1/2'PLYWD ` e PAVEMENT W/6%6 W1.4%WI.4 W.W.M. FRAME Z m 5f FELT % 1/2' - 2X4 STUD WALL 10EDARR SHINGLES d m - /r cw BOARD 1xz TRIM ; a ":�k�' ,_.)e•-( :- •.N-" .max' •:-ia�� I 2-2%e HEADER ]I -FRAME u Y 2• J.., B !i DOOR - o NOTES. .. 7E-PAN..J..T �% lNOTES I 2%4 WOOD �R/ � J1• PROVIDE ST O.D.S4' .0 DIME SR PIPE RAIL FRAMED SM}'GALV /�\\�% �\ � �%� � �%�i�\ �i �%� �\ 1.SLOPE OF WALK SHALL BE LESS 1/2'G7P BOARD STUD$STL BALUSTERS O 4'O.C. WELD ALL JOINTS d GRIND SMOOTH. B' THAN 1:20 OR 5K IN DIRECTION OFPAINTBLUETYP. TRAVEL DOOR JAMB DETAIL 6'MINIMUM PROCESS X CRY COMP T2. PLUMB POSITS W METAL SHIMS d EMBED IN a'd CORED HOLES ANCHOR PREFORNT IN 2 LIFTS TO 95z MA%.DRY DENSITY AS R HEAD DETAILNON-SHRINK ORDUT,TYP. PER ASTM 15%,METHOD'D' 2 CROSS SLOPE F 1 WALK SHALLSCALE:1 " 1'F41ER O' 7 O.C.MAX. ALSO AT JOINT BE A MAXIMUM OF 1:50. SCALE:1 1/2"=1'-O" �1 TYP RAILING DETAIL BETWEEN NEW d EXIST WALXS GENERAL NOTES: V COMPACTED EXIST.SUB BASE 3.HAUNCH SHOWN IS TYPICAL FOR 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDINGSHALL THIS PROJECT IN FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE EXTENT OF SCALE:1/2"=1'-O" ALL EDGES OF WALK. BID. REWIRED,AND EXISTING CONDITIONS,AND SHALL TANS THESE INTO CONSIDERATION IN THE COST OF HIS I 1. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS,LABOR,TOOLS,PLANT SUPPLIES,EQUIPMENT,TRANSPORTATION, WALK/SLAB DETAIL SUPERINTENDS,TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION OF EVERY NATURE AND ALL OTHER SERVICES AND FACILITIES NECESSARY 5 TO COMPLETE THE WORK FOR THE POSTAL SERVICE,INCLUDING ALL INCIDENTAL WORK DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT 18. ALL SURFACES,MATERIALS AND ITEMS DAMAGED OR ALTERED BY THE WORK W THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE REPAIRED NOT TO SCALE TOP EL DOCUMENTS AND/OR RECONSTRUCTED TO MATCH THE EXISTING ADJACENT SURFACES IN TE%NRE AND COLOR. e O l0a'-0' - ---- NOTE: 2. WHEN THE TECHNICAL PROVISIONS PERMIT THE CONTRACTOR TO SELECT OPiIONAI MATERIALS,ITEMS,SYSTEMS OR 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY AND ALL NECESSARY PERMITS,SCHEDULING REWIRED 01 EQUIPMENT,THE SELECTION OF SUCH OPTIONS IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF CLAUSE FB-244.OPTIONAL INSPECTIONS AND OBTAINING FINAL APPROVALS. DO NOT PROVIDE HANDRAILS WHERE Cl IS INDICATED. MATERIALS OR METIH005 OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL El0'OSED CONIC WALL SURFACES d SLAB EDGES SHALL 3• BEFORE ANY OF THE WORK IS STARTED,THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONFER WITH THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S 2O THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL SUBMIT ALL REQUIRED STOP DRAWINGS,PRODUCT LITERATURE OR i }X 4 P.T.CCNT BLOCKING FOR HAVE RUBBED FINISH REPRESENTATIVE(CDR)AND AGREE ON A SEQUENCE OF PROCEDURES SAMPLES IN A TIMELY MANNER TO AFFORD TINE FOR REVIEW,SELECTION OR APPROVAL _ FENCE SUPPORT o p) MEANS OF ACCESS TO THE PREMISES AND BUILDING. STOCKADE FENCE BOARDS 70P O 1}'O.D.S.BD GALVANIZED 8) DELIVERY OF MATERIALS AND USE CL APPROACHES. 21. DURING CONSTRUCTION PERIOD,USE O THE EIGHTY,INCLUDING USE OF THE SITE,WILL BE LIMITED BY CONDITIONS E STEEL TOP RAILS THAT MUST BE COORDINATED KITH AND AGREED TO BY THE OWNER AND LOCALITY.CONFINE OPERATIONS 7O AREAS m III"O.D.P R IL GALVANIZED C) LOCATION OF EATING SPACES FOR THE CONTRACTORS EMPLOYEES AND THE UKE WITHIN LIMITS AGREED UPON.CONFIRM STE ACCESS RESTRICTIONS OR LIMITATIONS NTH ALL PARTIES INVOLVED PRIOR H TO SUBMITTING A BID. STEEL HANDRAILS 4. THE POSTAL SERVICE WILL CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE FACILITY DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WOK. 3 ACCORDINGLY,THE CONTRACTOR MUST ARRANGE AND SCHEDULE WORK OPERATIONS TO FACILITATE SUCH CONTINUED 22 ANY PROJECT WORK ITEMS THAT MUST BE DONE DURING POST OFFICE'S NON-BUSINESS HOURS(NIGHTS/WEEKENDS) -- USE AND OPERATIONS.CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS,WHICH CANNOT BE PERFORMED DURING NORMAL POSTAL FACILITY SHALL BE SO SPECIFIED WITHIN THESE DOCUMENTS.ALL SUCH WORK SHALL BE SUPERVISED BY THE OWNER'S ORE 4'C DEW HOLE TO RECEIVE : OPERATING HOURS,MUST BE PERFORMED AFTER HOURS OR DURING PERIODS WHEN THE FACILITY IS NORMALLY CLOSED PERSONNEL SUCH WORK MUST BE SCHEDULED AND ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER SEVEN(7)DAYS IN ADVANCE. POST,GROUT SAWCUT CONC I}'d 0 TO PATRONS.THE CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE SUCH WORK NTH THE CONTRACTING OFFICER OR HIS DESIGNATED POST IN PLACE `T--11'O.D.SCH 80 GALV STEEL 5-0'O.C.MAX EACH REPRESENTATIVE. •i 1" POST O 6'-0,O.C.MAX WAY 21 SAFETY:SAFETY IS OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE.THIS PROJECT IS IN A PUBLIC SPACE WITH HIGH PEDESTRIAN 45DO PS AIR ENTRAINED CONIC 3' 2 TRAFFIC.PUBLIC ACCESS WLL REMAIN OPEN THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. 3' w/6X6 WI.4 X WI.4 W'WM 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ERECT THE NECESSARY WARNING SIGNS AND BARRICADES 70 ENSURE THE SAFETY OF ALL }'SO GALV STEEL BALUSTERS 0 4- i POSTAL SERVICE PERSONNEL CUSTOMERS AND SECURITY.CONTRACTOR MAY BE DIRECTED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL I O.C.MAX,WELD TO TOP d BOTTOM 24. yQ CUTTING OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS N1LL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY ARCHITECT GINEFR. RAILS 4500 PS AIR ENTRAINED MEASURES,AS MAY BE NECESSARY,A7 ANY TIME BY LISPS OR THE TOWN.ALL SIGNS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONC r/6X6 WE4 X 09U STANDARDS AND MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY UPON BEGINNING WORK.CONDITIONS AT PROJECT STE MUST i•:-- --•=e _ 1}'O.D.SCH 80 GALV STEEL 1 4 WAWJ CONFORM,STRICTLY,TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ENFORCING THESE m '' HANDRAILS RELOCATED REOULATIDNS. 25. COORDINATE SCHEDULING WORK,DELIVERIES AND STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS XIIH THE POSTAL SERVILE .a Ij' EXIST BOLLARD 1 1}'O.D.SCH 80 GALV STEEL 1 o� �W BOTTOM RAILS 3' PATCH d REPAIR EXIST 6. AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION,KEEP PREMISES FREE FROM THE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS. 26. REUSE O SALVAGED MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY SCHEDULED WILL BE AT THE SOLE DISCRETION OF THE OWNER IN 2- BARS • • _ ^• - 6' COMPACTED GRAVEL 6� NO CASE SHALL SALVAGED MATERIALS BE INCORPORATED INTO THE WORK THAT DO NOT MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS $ H NOTE: /a DOWELS B'L O 16'O.C. BIT.PAVEMENT MIN 7. ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK ON THIS PROJECT MUST BE PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE WATI1 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND O'STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS. TOP d BOTTOM v _ HEALTH ACT OF 1970 DR WTH LOCAL OR STATE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS ENFORCED BY AN A 1.HANDRAIL/GUARDRAIL IIII .a < AGENCY OF THE LOCALITY OF STATE UNDER A PLAN APPROVED BY US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY COMPONENTS TO BE PAINTED. - 27.CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED ON A DAILY BASS BY THE CONTRACTOR. ` _ • o _ AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION(OSHA). > ,3000 PSI CONIC WALL Y.SLOP FABRICATE GUARD/HANDRAIL ASSEMBLY; < • s;a ,�. I. 2& DRAWINGS SHOW INITIAL AREAS WHERE WORK MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.INCIDENTAL WORK INCLUDING POSTS,IN MAX _ ... _. ..::.'.::'.-:...: ... e a ` "`'" ) y 8. VERIFY AND DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO START OF WORK AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY C.O.R.OF ANY "(=. .,. MAY ALSO BE NECESSARY IN AREAS NOT SHOWN DUE TO CHARGES AFFECTING EXISTING MECHANICAL 0.ECiRICAL a LENGTHS ALLOWED FOR FINISHING.FIELD HELD "r - - �•• PWMBING.OR OTHER SYSIENS.SUCH INCIDENTAL WORK IS ALSO A PART OF THIS CONTRACT.INSPECT THOSE _ SECTIONS TOGERHER. o, 'a; .• e,� . • 'I" " CONFLICTING CONDITIONS BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND PLANS AREAS,ASCERTAIN WORK NEEDED,AND DO THAT WORK IN ACCORD WITH THE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS,AT NO - •' 3.ALL JOINTS FOR RAILS TO BE SMOOTH d (1] 1-ITT-II I;.' �, « ETII=f1T= & PROTECT ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING DEMOLITION d CONSTRUCTION WORK ADDITIONAL COST. - - ' IIIII IIIII=I I I_I I I I I_I I I I I = iI=II }" �m-T-III I�IF'- CONTINUOUS. _ I r-III III-11= 29. WHERE PERMANENT REMOVAL OF EXISTING MILLWORK,OR ACCESSORIES IS REQUIRED,AND PREVIOUSLY CONCEALED ALL SCREWS 70 BE INSTALLED NTH POCK -" .....-""'-' -""' - - -I c `1ii-Yid=it'�m1L1= 10. ALL WORK 91ALL CONFORM TO STATE BUILDING AND FIRE CODES AND REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN. SURFACES ARE TO REMAIN EXPOSED,PATCH PREVIOUSLY CONCEALED SURFACES TO MATCH ADJACENT EXPOSED -III w. IIIII-I I I I r 'IIIII-IIIII-I _ I i I- =1 11 I SURFACES.WHERE SURFACES ARE SCHEDULED TO RECIEVE NEW FINISHES.PREPARE THOSE SURFACES TO RECIEVE -I ALLS •� J F..,�.•I. '.I-(�- 11. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE PATH MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS 1= IIIII=IIIII=11 .1=IIIII=IIIII I I I_ E.': -m o THE NEW FINISHES, 5.SPACE POSTS 0 6'-0'O.C.MAX.FINISHED - II It .p; -III RAIL MUST RESIST 250 LB LOAD IN ANY 8 I-I'.:.I.'.:,l [LI= 30. WHEN EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN ARE TO BECOME THE SUBSTRATE FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW FINISHES,PREPARE 'IIII DIRECTION. '.• =IIIII=IIIII_ [IIIII=IIIII- a. iTo =I 3OUD PSI CONIC 18' Q 12. 00 NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THOSE SURFACES BY REMOVING FINISHES,FILL VOIDS AND SECURE OR REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY EXISTING LOOSE OR _ n ROUND OR SQUARE _ "'. �.•...'r: [LI- 6.SAW CUT CONTROL JOINTS 1'd 0 5'-0'O.C. = IIIII=IIIII= I=III I _I I I I I- _IIIII •T,...r:. '.(TiT 13. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY WORKMEN SKILLED IN THEIR TRADE IN A NEAT AND CLEAN MANNER. OR FURNISHINGSOTHERVASE 11AND PREPARE SUBSTRATE 0 RECEIVE TABLE SUBSTRATE MATERIALS.ADD NEW FlNISHEING IS AS�SPEGFlEO ORREI NEW TMEATERIAlS,EQUIPMENT MAX.EACH WAY. INSTALL PREFORMED _ Ii f •',.1= iii IIII • • EXPANSION JOINT FILLERS 0 SO'-0'O.C. III • •• -_IIII-_ I- I -_III.•< r0 I- 14. ANY AND ALL REVISIONS MADE BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING NTH C MAX.d MERE NEW CONCRETE ABUTTS WORK.REVISIONS MADE WITHOUT SUCH APPROVAL SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 31. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE TESTED AND INSPECTED FOR APPROVAL BY GOVERNING AUTHORITIES d EXISTING CONCRETE. _ =IIIII=IIIII=1 1=IIIII=IIIII= = EL 93'_D f - S E � IA � GUARD/HAND RAIL o GUARD/HAND RAIL GUARD/HAND RAIL ��1 BOLLARD/GONG PAD DETAIL IS ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO CODE REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING SPECIFIC TRADES(NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. 32 RAMP SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 IN 125 OR BX TOP,MIDDLE AND BOTTOM LANDING SLOPE AND CROSS SLOPE OF NATIONAL PLUMBING CODE ETC..). RAMP SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 IN 50 OR 2i SLOPES WALL BE CHECKED NTH 4-FOOT SMART LEVEL SHOULD THE T� Z U SCALE:1"=1'-0" ��J SCALE.1"=1'-0" �' SCALE:1"-1'-0" V SCALE:1"=1'-0" 16. THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT RECEVE CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLIANCE N1TH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS. SLOPES EXCEED THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS,THOSE NON-COMPLIANT SURFACES XILL BE REPAIRED OR REMOVED AND �_ v � REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. Q � o } SECTION - SEWAGE ti- STt�T = Hwti-! — �T'G . Co t� 1t�tA-ss. c3z 3, � � �ZS - SEPTIC TANK - - "D"BOX - -LEACH LSr TlzE IJGI.1 3t.00 VSsr SCH• 4© tPvr. E>'6^F_ 010 P�.V611dE►�1T" ....•••• (MSU• fe_I.1EATH De1Vt=_W 4V D OWASHED STONE �— �— ZV NOTE: REMOVE ANY UNSUITABLE MATERIA F R A OISTANC 72 30 ZB OF 10 FT.AROUND ENTIRE LEACH I C}l•G ev -Ls24(. AND REPLACE WITH CLEAN COARSE SAND. / W/1=T. Co.oz(•� ( .,/Fr. (0.00 1 its. t �.tla - t �+�/ = 35.11 � � (o' �@e3vu' a.+r< mrof OUT� I��� IN t__ nI�T' •---"-. .��► ( OZ f r'L,�e -OUT , IN ZgZ7 OTANK G ZS ELEV. ELEV. .n2 22'�L'1'S t:•rd� 1rr; .:.�'•:tifr,l •1.?♦ . � T tLa'1�2�' �/ //� IfJ /ELEV. a ELEV. �.._� _ Z l 21-13, /Zi zz i 2t.j - ELEV. ELEV, P01J0 S _}_ EL."19.3 a GRoUsJfl BRING ALL COVERS TO WITHIN vN4TLtZ OF w"•11k^ \ 4 •i!" WASliEDSTONE I FT.OF FINISH GRADE. ` 11 J✓ , C6aic*— Plpe� �QZ{ = i`D E:XrST ►.IG J i r TEST HOLE LOG elcl+aa• PAU%- 1.. Gtk-T,- exm a. uc:�> TEST BY Ia �K R�. 13,," os= to eX urw O�F10E 3L UG. tz s+e.y� Z` 9 WITNESS 6 TEST t?ATESIGN � T.H. 21 i tort: �S9z23. `0� .44.f 4�S T.H. • 19 29.3 >d>`E�a t>v cLEAI.� t=�rlE a�Lce�-Is 10006. 29oq J l �!C .� Env. d ELEV i5AwD L+ T.W. 19 EL=21.0_ p„ NO LD sio - ( DISPOSER IZ" 3 Z'�.o j2Lo 81 PERC RATE Z MINAN. D 5P05� SILTY fmt� FLOW RATE 290 (GAL/DAY ) tv Il C.&A SEPTIC TANK 79in A (LS")= 43G 4t5" t4.o REO'D SEPTIC TANK SIZE I o ego L — — Yts �t3o� G Y �. � PA-4w ��� �. P t c C EkLJ 1=1�1E 6•C' 2Z.3 LEACH FACILITY emapdstp �i f�QIV�WIs, SIDE WALL Z'x 25'x £ x_ (Z-S) _ Z50_ GID. f ttL s O TZo" (9.9 BOTTOM � /c 25 x= ( �•� ) G ID. 3Ca C� � (Obi '9•o n TOTAL 15.oS.• ' t ____--�/� ' 3 Z �� ,�• z>3 USE: LEACHING TtZF_"GI-i To Ffk2 144` tf:.o tt3o� 14.3 o%im LA-vV%L 25 1oh v z'r.ylde K 2'deeptbelow }�4Er_) WATER ENCOUNTERED i LIP >� S.t_ 1 i NOTES: (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) "44 1.DATUM(MSL1:TAKEN'BOMM�N I"'1/§ 1 QUADRANGLE MAP CLw r /INN D/ x*_ti 5 vA BLE I t�°LA 0 S \ MUNICIPAL WATER i #(\ 2 K rrJA r1.PIPE PITCHt w"PER FOOT rExCIEPT AS s4 O'-vi4 �`'`4.DESIGN LOADING FOR ALL PRE-CAST UNITS:AASHO• - '� =jZ Jt z�JAM �� /3 c- ---�--DISTANCE AS CERTIFIED S.MIN.GROUND COVER OVER ALL SEWAGE FACILITIESt 11) FT. / �i.►IPEJOINTS SHALL BE MADE WATER TIGHT G h( _-f 7.CONSTRUCTION DETAILS TO BE ACCORDANCE WITH COMM.OF MASS. O 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE B(11LDING SITE m STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE TITLE S �1 SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS LOCATED ON THE pft C'TAT �+ q � !S T E LOCUS: L..O t' I, - iZC3QT i, .� .GROUND AS SHOWN HEREON i THAT(T STE f�, ,sup TOW'CONFORM OF THE ZONING 8Y LAWS OF THE Y�J�S.T �Q.�i1'T .I'.'�1. REG.PROFESSIONAL NGINEER YVHEN CONSTRUCTED. GATE 3 i REF: 1...4.+'I!� C.C�'"T`� ' jyoty#7 Cep!' �ttd►l�f�lt�tf PREPAREDFOR: CI\APe C-0t) CIVIL ENGINEERS Co-coPE.g:z IvF I�t.31e�� _. l LA"SURVEYORS -------_- BO`A�RD OF HEALTH REG.LAND SURVEYOR 01 CONTOURS (EXISTING) --•-•- ���KU�JY�I LE S MA Ystmoutfi i Oflew ,MA SCALE M IPROPOSEM-O-O-O-O- APPROVED DATE _ ATE t�E-i"a 1 L.S