The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0000 BEECH LEAF ISLAND ROAD - Health (4) Lots 14 & 14A Beech Leaf Island Rd. ~� ' Centerville - Silvia ` t• cf THE to DOWN OF BARNSTABLE FEE d OFFICE OF RECEIVED BY It "' M��l& ; BOARD OF HEALTH 7 � 367 MAIN STREET HYANNIS, MASS. 02601 VARIANCE REQUEST FORM All variances must be submitted FIFTEEN (15) days prior to the scheduled Board of Health meeting. . �. NAME OF APPLICANT Silvia & Silvia Associates, Inc.* TEL. NO.775-1442 ADDRESS OF APPLICANT 619 Main Street Centerville MA 02632 NAME OF OWNER OF PROPERTY Silvia & Silvia Associates Inc SUBDIVISION NAME Beech Leaf Landing (II) DATE APPROVED ASSESSORS MAP AND PARCEL NUMBER Map 187 Lot 80 LOCATION OF REQUEST Subdivision lots 14 and 14A, Beech Leaf Island Road 22,0=48.33 upland SIZE OF LOT 27,893.33 uetlard SQ. FT. WETLANDS WITHIN 200 FT. OF PROPERTY: Yes__.I_No 49,941.66 total VARIANCE FROM REGULATION(List Regulation) Setback from wetlands: 77' rather than 100' for both primary and reserve REASON FOR VARIANCE(May attach letter if more space is needed) SEE ATTACHED 1 PLAN — TWO COPIES OF PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED CLEARLY OUTLINING VARIANCE REQUEST. ' VARIANCE APPROVED NOT APPROVED ' REASON FOR DISAPROVAL TL;�gent: A. M. Wilson Associates, Inc 911 Main Street --------- -- - ---- - -- ' Osterville, MA 02655 Ito Iyert L. CIIi i lr; C:!m i.rma;i Phone: 428-1450Awi Grover C.M. Farrish, M.D. ' BOARD OF t1EALTII TOWN OF BARNSTABLE A.M.Wilson ' Associates Inc. August 1 , 1988 Barnstable Board of Health Town Hall Main Street ' Hyannis, MA 02601 Re: Request for Variances from Local Regulation Septic System Design and Installation Lots 14 and 14A, Beech Leaf Island Road, Centerville (our file 2 .0292 .0) Dear Board Members: Attached please find revised plans for a single family home with ' on-site septic system proposed to be constructed on Lots 14 and 14A, Beech Leaf Island Road, Centerville, MA (Figures 1 and 2) . The proposed septic system conforms with all requirements of Title 5, 310 CMR 15 . Variances from local regulation are ' required only for setbacks from wetlands. other local regulations applicable to the project are met by the proposed design. The site in question is abutted on the east and southeast by a large, mature red maple swamp (Figures 3 and 4) . It is bounded on the north and west by the layout and travel way of Beech Leaf Island Road and, beyond the road, additional mature wooded swamp. The swamp, +45 .6 acres of which are owned by the project proponent, drains into a small pond and then into the Bumps .' River . Travel distances for surface flows between the site and the river are approximately 3 ,800 ft . Travel distances for groundwater, considering regional flow directions as mapped by ' USGS, CCPEDC and SEA Consultants (Figures 5, 6 and 7) on behalf of the Town of Barnstable, are approximately 2 ,000 ft. Even if it were determined that local ground water flow ran counter to regional flow, in a westerly direction, the shortest distance to Scudder Bay is approximately 1000 ft . We would note that the site is not, based on both County and Town ' sponsored studies, within a Zone of Contribution to any public drinking water supply well (Figures 8 and 9) . ' During review of a previous variance application filed for this site, the Board voiced a number of concerns which we would like to discuss. These included: the potential for phosphate contamination due to the use of septic systems at the site; ' questions about seasonal high ground water , and sufficient separation between the bottom of the system and ground water table. 911 Main Street Osterville/MA 02655 4281450 ' Appended to this report is a partial reference list of studies of pollutant uptake rates in various types of wetlands (Exhibit A) . In general , wetlands function to renovate wastewater flows in two ways. The first is through adsorption of pollutants onto the surface of soil particles. Because, in this area, organic and inorganic wetland soils tend to be composed of smaller, more ' numerous soil particles than adjacent sandy upland soils, and because high surface tension and small pour sizes in wetland soils slow internal water movement, there is more capacity and opportunity for pollutants to bond ionically with the soils. Such bonds tend not to break down so long as soils are undisturbed. The second method of renovation is through plant uptake. Some pollutants remain caught in the root system or in the stems of woody plants. Some material , which becomes concentrated in deciduous leaves or herbaceous plants, may be released to the system at a later time. In temperate climates, ' such as ours, this release is delayed until winter . Winter release balances the system by discharging when transport out of the system is high due to storm and tide regimes and when other system inputs such as those due to wild animals, birds, emergent ' and submergent plants and algae are low. This reduces impacts overall. Nitrate, a constituent of concern in wastewater flows can be taken up by wetlands at rates averaging over 100 lbs. per surface acre per year . Because the average production of nitrate from a three bedroom home with 5 ,000 s.f . of lawn is +20 .5 lbs./year (5 ' lbs./person; average occupancy of 2 .3 persons per dwelling; 1 .8 lbs. Nitrogen/1,00 s.f . of lawn) , one acre of wetland can remove nitrogen from four homes with some excess capacity for animals ' using the area, input from road drainage and other miscellaneous sources. ' Phosphorous uptake rates are lower , but then so are production rates. A study originally performed by USEPA as part of the Rural Lakes Project found that in the Illinois area, small kettle ponds without wetland fringes where old septic systems were close ' to ground water and/or the water ' s edge stood a chance of being contaminated by phosphate to a point where algae growth could be stimulated and subsequent oxygen depletion result . Even if the ' soil and ground water regimes present in the study area were analogous to the Barnstable Glacial Outwash Plain area- and we believe they are not - the flushing characteristics of the ' systems involved - kettle hole ponds versus estuaries - make the study nontransferable. In fact, more recent studies have shown that phosphorus has very low mobility rates in sandy, dry soils, and slower rates yet in hydric (wetland) soils, especially when ' those soils are vegetated. Assuming typical loading rates of 3-5 mg/cap/day, (0 .004 lbs/yr) and average uptake rates of 10+ lbs./year, combined with the distances from the site to the ' river, and flushing potential for the river and estuary, it is i 1 our professional opinion that phosphate pollution should not be ' problematic nor of concern to the Board in this case. We would also note that the 45 .6+ acres of wetland owned by the proponent filter material from the 32 house lots in his ' development. The ratio of wetland to house lot is approximately 1 . 4 acres/lot. Thus there is more than ample wetland to provide renovation for nitrate and phosphate water flows from the development as a whole. The vertical distance between the bottom of the proposed septic ' system and the groundwater should be of concern. It is this volume of aerated soil within which bacterial attenuation predominantly occurs . In addition nitrification/denitrification, which acts to reduce nitrate loading and some other pollutant attenuation occurs in this areated zone. In general, as the vertical distance is reduced, travel time between the system and and the groundwater is reduced (providing soils are uniform) and t pollutant loading to groundwater is increased. This is especially true in the case of coliform bacteria. Our office has reviewed the USGS theoretical groundwater maps for the subject site. It maps the site as not within a zone where groundwater adjustments are required (Figure 10) . We have also reviewed the groundwater observation data by Baxter and Nye, Inc. ' taken during the wettest time of this year , and taken additional readings in an observation well emplaced by that firm at the site (Exhibit B) . Based on these observations, observations taken ' during subdivision roadway design and permitting (Exhibit C) , and our knowledge of the site relative to surrounding wetlands, it is also our professional opinion that groundwater fluctuations in this area can be read directly from spring observations, and ' should not be subject to further adjustment under the USGS formula. This is especially true since a nearly perennial stream running nearby in a constructed ditch, drains the surround ' wetland. Our office has discussed our interpretation with Dr. Michael Frimpter of USGS and has submitted area maps. groundwater observation and test logs to him for review. At the time of ' submission of this memorandum we are awaiting a final response from Dr . Frimpter . Regardless of the foregoing, plans have been revised to show 5 ' ' minimum between the bottom of the proposed leaching facility and observed groundwater based on readings taken at the site between February and April 1988 , typically the wettest part of the year t It is our opinion that the provision of this additional separation distance provides an extra margin of safety and exceeds that normally required by the Board. ' One last point which is relevant to pollutant loading in the Bumps River and its estuaries relative to this subdivision. 1 Unlike the adjacent public and private streets, which either discharge drainage directly to the River through paved waterways or directly to the ground through leaching catchbasins, the ' drainage from this subdivision is collected in trapped manholes which remove suspended solids from flows. Drainage then flows to velocity dispersion pools, some of which are vegetated. Additional settling occurs in these areas. Aearation serves to ' allow evaporation of volatiles and decomposition of some other pollutants. Plants and fine sediments provide additional attenuation Flows then run overland from the pools as sheet flow across wetlands providing still more renovation. Thus, pollutant loading from roadway drainage in this subdivision must be significantly lower than from adjacent public roads with direct ' discharges to surface and ground waters. It is, therefore, our professional opinion that the proposed design, in conjunction with innovative water quality protection ' design provided for other components of the subdivision, provide the same, or better , degree of environmental protection intended by the Board of Health' s regulations promulgated to date, ' including the regulation requiring a 100 ' setback from vegetated wetland. ' Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, ' A. M. WILS.0�1—A -S'OEIATES, INC. Arlene M. Wilson President 888AWl :ek ' cc: Floyd Silvia Attorney Robert Baun Attorney Albert Schulz 1 1 1 1 1 i � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I� 1 ' 1 i } i I 1 1 II 1 i d + II ' I i' I , t LIST OF FIGURES ' 1 - USGS Locus Map 2 - Subdivision Compost Map ' 3 - Town Assessors Map ' 4 - DEM Coastal Wetlands Restriction Map 5 - CCPEDC groundwater Contour Map for Cape Cod 6 - Water Contours at existing pumping rate s,from SEA Consultants Groundwater and Water Resource Protection Plan ' 7 - Water Contour at saturation pumping ibid 8 - Town of Barnstable Zone of Contribution Map by SEA ' Consultants 9 - Town of Barnstable Water Protection Overlay Zoning Map ' 10 - USGS Groundwater Index Map 888aw2 t t r t LIST OF EXHIBITS ' A - Pbllutant Update Study References B - Observation well data by Baxter and Nye ' C - Peat Probes Report and observation hole logs by BSC/Cape Cod Survey D - Indicator Species List and site report t ✓- — \� J I S r +ran/berry 'J y-Cranberry Y2;/ /, �. Bogs /. —/L I�� ,`� ." ;`.�•� a �..; i 4*5 �. ,' CL- I .��' �'� l �� •o. _ SEA 50 wF 13 Flsh y. Hatchery �. _- BM 60 \ ///.J// 26 '� `i• i / p o n vy •/ �r �FRD _;�Beechwood� Cranberry o��f (; ii C, Ji `j y \ •III: ..``.� Bog ' v \... / - ai `Cranberry B�!-M •/�� , FlanGisk�avle1s�ll Bog . t n •Center�zIle -41 It .C3 r � • ..,.Scudde -r� \ ^ =BMRet 39 ICJ /.• 'r Bay Y n ti�per- _ / �• �/ / !n Vj �a .20 sL•(� po _ `�� i \ i ? i•�. CraiVilli~ L VA:- 1 r �El�zn I •-�'` •\ ,► `�� 1 fST�!:Boding �'•••.• \ } \i �IILLj1 J� j; • •Mort\!9 '.�;. �� •�L �. � .:`,"�J. :r' G � n 11 " II 'J"Craigville Beach__ ° : ;�, 6, z Crai Ile cD 4 ,I•tl , .eo n ..�• Publ is Beach PMed Landing r3 each g l ;,•\ �.I '� BMA �r _ _ Spindle17 ' g°ck*�HARB:OR N uVj / CETER VILLE ,,.� fV. I i /9 � •� ti last Bay p / \ 14 each f t fir i \ ' /3 - - ' • %: Gannet/ / Rocks� G 1 From: USGS Topgraphic quadrangle ' for Hyannis MA FIGURE 1 - A.M.Wilson Associates ' Inc. i 1 ' LOCUS MAP ee ch.cut zinding I \ yV S� ..III- — SITE PLAN \J IN 3S 3d 13. / -r 'bAH AL Z 6 1 9p LdAF LEAF �— eo[� — QjP� SWAAAP zo — 1 � ' SALT POND -_ — ma v� FIGURE 2 N I .:. ___ - _____. �C .. as-e.f-•1. r oa. �� , :». _ ' / 7-St C►y ( I _I ' I 1 _ ( 1 1 From: Town of Barnstable Assessors Maps FIGURE 3 ' A.M.Wilson Associates Inc. .<S i ♦ f P r 1. ,, is rS}r y �, 4Y,,y - S` 0 n �r� � ,p,4 H t t,L � syrr t �1i �• * .r x t w.a •3 . � 1 s, * ro ( 2 :♦ !a1. t '+... 2 ry t. r r .�'S ? .$ •t'C it s f� ;' S ^� h'. 7 s; ,. x,. y� � yy tit: r S�:•t �`�s- P�� t�`t`�-s �d # i t y+-;�'. 4ju { s f ff,� Tsjjs��rj :rx � T►a. tt - •cl z E x ' .+ r� t `' H � f =` a, f a �' s� e /� x �'! \ �if;eR♦, � � +' ti r�'� f � ^a. � .�'!`,:�'4 +.��`� �lfi �-y .fir r,`+. } <Y j .. ` � :•, + fr <-'. 'q' tr'''�f ,�TP� s f � v -G I M {' h EAS t',_ tr! �k S. 4 s � r ,'t� � r �l 1.ri xa •e t L, s tirr 'r:'e a e A� � 1 � T+ ! �� s � '� ' � y._; �i�,,+��% �',:F }aj�^a4=`t,l` � e'' F � *fit .i� Gr,`,> � r� •Sw }c �,,� �.` '� ��• 'i f} ♦ 6 ! � tie t �{>< >' 4} A-, t ��)Fr t�, _' 1 t J��wi�,a'_F'z 4; ';��✓� � +`.,;.t s`r f!E f 3 \t r � j 7 ri.r t � i� Y� `M1i} � S DTI f��' t tj a {�7�� ♦"�"tp4.4 3. fie• V74, Ct P �+ •s, °" t r,st � ,tt.~s ' fit jsHFHCr �• `,♦ $ ♦ ,tom i \a ;f,� � ,�,r, �� yS ; s} A� s�l�.•s �'r r �s 'S C ! s4F •C t r 1 'ire 5s Afj i r7 .l i �bq+,ti�f � •�4 y7�n� ��iiat' �� {� 4 �` i 1 ��x 5 �k} '� Y ° r. r �,� ' ' \~ + �.. •tea` ,t � f 4 � _i' t ♦.w' � ♦ sl t t 4r'.1 ... ems: ,R✓' ',�,.F s ',I e J 1 .. 1 f� •:. '`fi a � Y��iIIY!��6�4 � s3 at r , ,S, f � a - ` � y �. tZ we'df l ' lt' .�y�,,,,,.11�.'�yr`��- s _ry t h1'. ? a - *, ,��•P `t. t' 3 �t lX, i—. fi ✓ i ✓:•��l.{'T a�.lfi� A 1�+ dt't s j /.4 { - : r 1� ��N� 'L fi`s �!" fix. '.a x M. to 1Tf 14, St _ d .t�i. a � 1 t � �•.4 •�t� a r♦ Sr rt •�,, t f L.R P nI.'1 yr 1,s s 'a �. C�� •.,:. f�.;t t? �1 t f��4` k 7i ,..:s.:.Y es '� '^^��5 .,,.t� +_ f • � ��,� i rd t�yr.ih t F s «: GROUNDWATER CONTOURS — ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL MAY 25, 197 ' """" GROUND WATER DIVIDE API ANA iION WATLN'TAbT L CONTOUR SHOWS ALIOUOE OF THE WATER TABLE IN FEET AbUvE Mf Al' SLA ILvEL DASHED WHERE LOCATION INFENNEO CONTOUN INTERVAL IO FEET SOURCE: WATER TABLE YAP OF CAPE COD, USOS 1977 BOURNE i 20 SANDWICH 1 U 60 ao I i ' ' �► , :0 .I w 60 T o- / mho \ 0 0 1 >\ . '. . . a 609"' // ••••40....... ........ .......... .°. t / so / cb _ f\ 8 q o1 \V 20 �- -\\ __� BARNSTABLE ;X-9a 1 From: CCPEDC 208 Report for Barnstable County FIGURE 5 A.M.Wilson Associates '. Inc. �' -• � : _ z� -C A P E COD B/A I From: Eck 41, Groundwater and Water Resource 7 °' }'''ut�� Protection Plan for Barnstable ' ` N.,.y .; i• b SEA Consultants a 4� Y FIGURE 6 p •Y y� K lrti wN �r.naYn•Ke p .�. 1 4 xy i►-' T.a•i,�t;`�� .A?JN 29..4 .i �,.. s /.i �1 W 24Z •r� n t..q _ -at - \� i is ,•. d � -�� y�- t _ - O C43Cf� n "H. b, r /i fin T a r } '1- �-r� ':,:"i C1- •y'z��'-:. r A I W 293®-r -"{�s'i Cre .. ri� � - _d �, •�°l 1. ��•'�. •_ _ .=pQ87 _ i.,,�.� / ^' \4 �. -• S_ fit:� :1 _\�, \ �' i '. A �� • ^ 6W MDS •, /:r r, to i V, y� p •t)lt ../ •i. .`r / .� BW MD1—^• BW MD2 _,r �L�� .^ ice, �CF at: : , �` - BW AIRI .J► y -. f L Sr HYAP .JS 11CN"j[�l;TI POLLUTIONin ' '• n.., •C10.12 C< I 'J E [ # °• CQNTRd�,:.,Fd_c,hl1r.Y (WPCF) �� _ 1 / 7 � t, 'At W LWPC)e:8 .3 - 711 +1�� MEE' - V. c ._ ..:. >`: fs it r.* !/ J,y. • • OW MDLJ�� J IN .Jam•` �t w. y. Q.' t -� /' �I-[ ,'l [ ;WPCF r •'�� : � r ! r R f�. Lrri;cio r T� ®wac BEY f ; ""•.a`. -Z r�• f. . ' rt�•�t)6 J3W ssi zt � J t </aj � r \ ��T- ��•y.<_ ri.. F -.a. ti f._ r �� \.Fx[� rev :3 �•� i '�1i ��'�� < � '�C I •tl,r•� fi i 8. 1 ��J t �'i 't,, � •• - Av'r µ�r• it �• ••:`• .•" N>ANN,7c llARairL r••. • • S C �i, t� t �� iLf:7Lx i'/L Lf, r NAARI,Q" •; . f• t `A�1N.9P7, sl ry f/f lop ioo !' •rM M erryYler � �. .(� .I<a N A N T U C A' £. T S OM C N DI `; -.a •.`- .Ile A,WA ' '•NOTE El—lotlel,e A,@ 1.••,�• �•• ra aln uae - 'yol« Frrl AOor• Y•An are L•rRlhnd rp' SC '.••' ant.lin Of Mo.• ler Ci<i,?IS a� ,wil. Town Of Barnstable Piezometric Head Under Present Pumping Conditions �tS� Elevation Under Average •a Recharge 1 ,x.,r.bNw.,<eN • C/O t2 Existing Public Supply Well g g O sa 2 Major Private Supply Well Groundwater Divide �.�i.. ---YO---- Elevation Under Drought Conditions ry WIM tt.anlY ® Atw¢e2 Permanent Observation Well llmooll Owl M ',lo.ae it nrm Prepared By: SEA Consultants Inc. Boston. Massachusetts rlprr&I From: A P. E C 0_D1- .}. ._B/'•A .:Y sit eat:Yt `-•. ,�". .- Groundwater and Water Resource 2 ~' � _,::�_ Protection PlanY by SEA r 1�6 � era'N" � Consultants, Inc. �� :' �: FIGURE 7 r...... I r _/n '`.1Y�2 "'�''''\�.'¢ .�.✓ -S':f-•'t ` � �- Y t!>I,'+ I✓ 1 r .r n. .�:I _ , .`� fir', � •T O `4h-'Y �y � _ - 'i1,, ��-may '?-- i a.-.. .� (I ` r •�'Y. ela, • uf..i I �. en^ nl�• B AR IV STABLE - ! •`+,:. tf. V. .t-'��- \r `>✓�' vtP---r*'�.'�}-�•! e_'w k _ •tl. '•5 r `'� l w....f1.•rri,� I.r� x )'�- 't `� r^Y ,)^ 4�.Rd� ..FY �l ir'� r.W `� n a - _�^.� � - t-• _ /,.T 2�' 1 .�"Y .� t -^.�--l t �.d'" � / •+r.-_-�. I o�......aC6}C:9�b� 1� � � ��.t+.'�'s r•- �A 1^'+�•+ � � 1 r � �'`S`s��'ti� '.l i }�µ'-. �. t ,^�BFp'hj ' '�t9 �1 c�..{ � I f �. c it �ors,_. tg� .�� f .<• _ � �, � ..t � ..Z,t ,i Oro . •- o 'fin- 1 hwrl''f.. Q "r t i'• "- i LADS r "A � ] . �BW;MDB MMIll - ��'�= 7�� .a=••. • ) --.ry -M °R •� ' ICJ' 4ER� '1 J': �B � 03 •o-� aa'...1�.. N�7 tf'ACJT�1'IWi* ) t +�. W _Q t. l�' 'i �✓ :sMaR OW AIR �` 40 I'Jill �t '' a :i•.. \ 1 f�` t� �WAtfl2 t � 1 •i BVX MD5! t�, s..^f .tea-• �'T _ ! t-�1 f �`1M M � 'l �A �,. '/ .��•¢•' .e. � .7 .• .fit 1+�. _ !t. L 1 w.. ,�.Y r.1. •� I't�r�. r,. _ l !\1:..� i�iC'i � �, f � ,.z�4. , + I ) �.L � •}��x'' r" -• i � t, > °_i i �� :„r'�,,. �t •'� i..- Iy. +. �a-a"''� _ Yr,)' �. .�\k J i -r' l ..�..1 tam �s- .Gr,A. �\ I7. �^ r•G•'fT;.,. rr f i. f.•y; T7"' wy J r, y t. , s J`r 'c .�11 N -�J"�+- . .. �w,i�r• L _ ../d $e ` CryT� J"- j { �e/O,:7f' i_ "'nn�...r.--•(.. /O.AR +'`-� f✓.:y�� .rL -`^`R�7r'� ,t,�. `'Y Zal� �d' �8 r s:.`. t �B SI �� ei -ti,�. ,."�, 7. ~[[ 4�L' \E W 419 BA'Y { •t ^ qt ��:. It<^Y` •C iy 'rn; ii r' `I�r e a �' '� n"".. ) � � � < 1, ..• ' .••�^-da -4. ..n r�:�f r-� :••e�.,e.•.n +y .�zs i 1: l3r '�L-' -•g _ �r �•"-,1- d aK y .. .: - a, ,�!,c ... e.v 1. i '.y r' y ~�• r u+h: �'r •�i�° � �!� �` �,`� t/i �� ,•,f _ 3 ��' I..•ref•• �' \ O �� h I . ;k.tVdf HYANNIS HARROB rt• l 1Z'-a•st. /• :�. :I ,.-� .�'sriyl - ` • ✓'f,-(y_C. �, ' t;r ');, },.�,!•�� .f6HTLR 91LL6 HARBORfff•••Xa] Q. 1. mot. >t. - rtJr z, 1 .,.Fa°. f►vr` j N A N T U C K E T 3 0 'U NI Dtj t o Yi �u �• ' .• ' {' M OTE:Eleeetlee••Are le ••� •� "\` iut e°ter nae - - ' a Feet Aeo•e Yee. see Leeel L%� rie Gres ewa Town Of Barnstable Piezometric Head Under Saturation Density Average Day Pumping Conditions t trr is -- - °1i bmd ee 15� Elevation Under Average Recharge -.unw r tel. • Dfo /R Existing Public Supply Well O so R Major Private Supply Well Groundwater Divide r d�Ilrr+ ---=o--- Elevstlon Under Drought Conditions eFD a Potential Future Public Supply Well Site .1r rM a r.per sett -Massachusetts - .m.mreem �� Prepared By: SEA Consultants Inc. sweton° ti t�- ,, Pt04(i�/7 ry jr .e Ati� ' ......_ .� '�., :< ar•E++1,: T+ <�,. a�' -i�':iXy��.i1��__.. �ram'": j'N fj .—� � .f.• ley r' ! . �R: ?+'t�t p^-�3b•• c. Y�si'' . ':ti'• ' / t y. + / r ��, a lRLi7✓ ,�F, sr `3 • d£ rr •. t' c. tt4� � r a�•!l';.�� < �1.�. C��/ '_:�w�iSfi �.,j Y � �/• _..• � ,.'` .+�7,a ,�d rT'�•E;.'e ry,''" •FyS� � I U 7L Y c 1 r�� l.� : •r a ,� rs 14 1,ti . r, t / k a.•'. /•• 7y4�rLMr J fie" Jc ku `••�'r • wo QQV k• z�,�.�/j_�l yl:6„�4�r A,vfl' � _K ��n r{�.}s�P1 •(��'1' R ,,x, r�,e vl' /. �,�{� �� j jly..:n'MY s'�`�rJ ~. _ � r\ �• J_ oy%r\ �� ::(%l\ r ; t j. -tp".tL ° '�'�Clq 't •!/ \, .uv+'•t f "x / '' r` Gro ,. ' �.�Y �'�., (•i 1 � �..� \ to hSC:tdLrtr 3 my /.` s ,r..+.y[.�.r'�' ^' y -- �1'^'y/f l! �, r i y�•,r .. V_�+ r - b � � 'F \� �'\_�r ,�. - �-- .,�.,. =•( y...[t�".�' yj fit, �'�• �'1 �t>�.�J'ct �' `':� <�t��if't,y�,\�<'• �,� \/ / �i ..K �•• y�= �s , � is s�s X+` �t �..�"'��y. } o- 4�' a'��+ t.`fLIgY�Ila.Y.4~lcli ..._ Y !"�;.=_r.•:�.: "'�f' -.✓ /' i l t .r.e6r' \ .:.?'./'.. 'Y• Pub':-Pk„-1 rliy L•..�+i'E .'.. a� F,s � '*d�'`'` '.f �;v ,j' LtnOri•; ./t/ •. r3'? Bch .\ y ar` ,? :•z ?,,, _•�:.�,ij �'• /'Q; :'off k �1.c:: �• �- /f CEAf TER 'ILLE XARL'`{1ft Hyar I From: ' Town of Barnstable Zone of Contribution Map by SEA Consultants FIGURE 8 - A.M.Wilson Associates Inc. - i \� � � / ,I _/ �� 1 .: \`/ � /; ,� ,� '� • .: ., ,� , �� ;- V �. / ;� l � '. f:� '� ,(� . � .: —��. i \ /� ` j.. I i ' / ��, � J _ is <��'� 1 ' � `• / �� J �`�� ;� / - - � � , �� /1�� . ;. , . ,�` �� , . , -� �, �, _T ,� � -�-� j , 1 , , •� �► �, l;, . , ��, � � / � � ..:�. � �� _ �N 1 - 'N �I •, / i i :i '�� ,/, � • .. • � � � - . . 1 '1-new'. l� sly � •.' r.'.• � �.��:� C�' / ry/!C'� t '- +�r �,`r �\ '-9..' 1\,h� t 7��2. fib, , ;Y�ti ff•�` ..1 I. / `• ��b j \( �'a-•\�.,1-a �I �.,;.t r S '�,.��rF + EXPLANATION • T.r`>. -! l 7' •�-?' , ,fi i'.: �:t.' __ t'. Annual range of ti ;- _.. rrM7,'7� ;round-water level,in feet _'''• ' 'i 0 - 2 TSW 89 Index observation well to be used for.. area delineated by dashed line. �... 0 3 4 N Arw.2300 Index observation well location ; '\Y, `' .�.� 4-5 and identification number. 5-6 p Pod i C�`'t fir\ ` • _ / .� .iony.l �a•{, .-`��.+••...��11111 . _• �1 -P8�`\tii r�- �.i� a i 'st�� p,,, � 't`� - � ss ^' f c �:�.�•� !'� t7 s` •ry- a :i,> , @ f �:. '��_�`i3,ji:•� �'°�•% �3. .�`f,,v ,�� •N� '?q. ..y� 1 n�d , ✓61.r'1 � r ,., ) _ �>.y, lv �tY• VI ��<;.4r D. ! .';', f I/ j•" \•- `. ram /� nJ ' From: USGS Groundwater index well map FIGURE 10 A.M.Wilson ' Associates Inc. A - POLLUTANT UPTAKE STUDY REFERENCES 1 UPTAKE LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP BOD TSS Semkin, R.G. , et at „ (1976) 1366.3 164.5 . Yonika, D. and Lowry, D. . (1979) 38. 1 113.2 Richardson, Curtis, J. , "Mechanisms Controlling Phosphorus 892.0 Retentioin Capacity in Freshwater Wetlands." (1985) Richardson, Curtis J. , ( 1985) 11 .3 Nixon, Scott W. . and Lee, Virginia, "Wetlands and Water Quality" 11.2 20.3 ( 19B3) Nixon, Scott W. , and Lee, Virginia, (1983) 8.9 Nixon, Scott W. . and Lee, Virginia, (1983) 30.4 Nixon, Scott W. . and Lee, Virginia, ( 1983) 21 .4 Nixon, Scott W. . and Lee, Virginia, (1983) 14.3 Nixon, Scott W. , and Lee, Virginia, (1983) 5.4 Nixon, Scott W. , and Lee, Virginia, (1983) 14.3 Nixon, Scott W. . and Lee, Virginia, ( 1983) 1 .8 Nixon, Scott W. , and Lee, Virginia, (1983) 1 .8 Nixon, Scott W. . and Lee, Virginia, ( 1983) 8.0 Hammer, David and Kadlec, Robert, "Design Principles for.Wetland 324.5 81 .2 Treatment Systems," (1983). Hammer, David and Kadlec, Robert, (1983) 194.0 32.0 Hammer, David and Kadlec, Robert, (1983) 4.4 UPTAKE LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP BOD TSS Tilton, D.L. , And Kadlec, R.H. , "The Utilization of a Freshwater 16.2 14.3 Wetland For Nutrient Removal From Secondarily Treated Waste Water Effluent." Kadlec, R.H. , and Tilton, D.L. , "Monitoring Report on the 10.0 7.3 Bellaire Wastewater Treatment Facility, 1977, Utilization Rep. No 1 ." (1977) Kadlec, R.H. , and Tilton, D.L. , "Monitoring Report on the 46.3 20.3 Bellaire Wastewater Treatment Facility, 1976-77, Utilization Rep. No 2." ( 1978) Kadlec, R.H. , and Tilton, D.L. , "Monitoring Report on the 65.8 10.9 Bellaire Wastewater Treatment Facility, 1978. Utilization Rep. No 3. " ( 1979) Kadlec, R.H. , and Tilton. D.L. , "Monitoring Report on the 42.5 10.3 Bellaire Wastewater Treatment Facility, 1979, Utilization Rep. No a." (1980) Burke. W. , "Fertilizer and Other Chemical Losses in Drainage 54.0 42.7 Water From a Blanket Bog. " (1975) Burke, W. . (1975) 119.2 83.9 Burke, W. , (1975) 62.4 31 .0 Kadlec.R.H. , "Monitoring Report on the Bellaire Wastewater 61 .7 9.8 Treatment Facility, 1980. Utilization Rep.. No. 5." (1981) Boyt, F.L. , et al . . "Removal of Nutrients from Treatment 6.9 Municipal Wastewater by Wetland Vegetation." (1977) Spangler, F.L. , et al .• "Phosphorus Accumulation-Discharge Cycles 43.3 in Marshes." (197.7) Yonika, D. and Lowry, D. . "Feasibility Study of Wetland Disposal 147.8 29.7 of Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent." (1979) Semkin, R.G. , et al . , "A Water Quality Study of Cootes Paradise," 286.8 59.8 (1976) i UPTAKE LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP BOD TSS Hammer, David and Kadlec. Robert, (1983) 5. 1 Hammer, David and Kadlec, Robert, (1983) 6.8 Hammer, David and Kadlec, Robert, (1983) 12.7 Hammer. David and Kadlec Robert (1983) 5.4 Hammer, David and Kadlec. Robert , (1983) 6.7 Hammer, David and Kadlec, Robert, (1983) 5. 1 Dykjove. D. and Hradecka, D. Production Ecology of Phragmites .68 .11 communis: I. Relations of Two Ecotypes to the Microclimate and Nutrient Conditions of Habitat. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. Praha 11 (1):23, 1976. Kykiova, D. and Hradecka, 1976. 5.08 .69 Kykjova, D. and Hradecka 1976. 1 .21 Kykjova, D. and Hradecka 1976. 8.60 Bernard. J.M. and Solsky, B.A. Nutrient Cycling in a Carex 184.23 37.38 lacustris wetland. Can. Jour. Bot. 55(5-8) :630. 1977. Bernard, J.M. and Solski . B.A. , 1977. 64.97 9.79 Bernard, J.M. and Solski , B.A. , 1977. 64.97 9.79 Bernard, J.M. and Solski . B.A. , 1977. 158.42 33.82 Klopatek, J. Nutrient Dynamics of Freshwater Riverine Marshes 280.35 37.83 and the Role of Emergent Macrophytes. In: Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential , R.E. Good, D.F. Whigham and R.L. Simpson (ads.) . Academic Press. New York, N.Y. , 1978. Klopatek, J. . 1978. 78.32 19.58 UPTAKE LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP SOD TSS Volz, M.G. Infestations of Yellow Nutsedge in Cropped Soil : 16.02 Effects on Soil Nitrogen Availability to the Crop and on Associated N Transforming Bacterial Population. Agro- Ecosys. 3:313, 1977. Volz, M.G. , 1977. 244.4 Mochnacka-Lawacz, H. The Effects of Mowing on the Dynamics of 388.9.3 38.9 Quantity, Biomass and Mineral Contents of Reed (Phragmites communis Trin. ) . Polskie Archiqum Hydrogiologii 21 (314):318, 1974. Mochnacka-Lawacz, H. , 1974. 613.21 65.86 Hook. J.E. . Kardos, L.T. , and Sopper, W.E. Effects of Land 168.65 Disposal of Wastewaters on Soil Phosphorus Relations. In: Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater and Sludge through Forest and Cropland. Pennsylavania State University Press, University Park, PA. , 1973. Chalmers, A.G. The Effects of Fertilization on Nitrogen 64.53 7. 12 Distribution in a Spartina alterniflora Salt Marsh. Estuar. Coastal Mar. Sci . 8:327. 1979. Kvet, J. Growth and Mineral Nutrients in Shoots of Typha 34.71 latifolia L. Symp. Giol . Hung. 15: 113, 1975. Kvet. J. , 1975. 53.4 2danowski , B. . Bninska, M. , Korycka, A. , Sosnowski , J. . Radziej, 456.3 29.2 J. . and Zachwieja, J. The Influence of Mineral Fertilization on Primary Productivity of Lakes. Ekologia Polska 26(2) : 153. 1978. Dykyjovs, D. Nutrient, uptake by Littoral Communities of 2340.7 358.67 Halophytes. In: . Pond Littoral Ecosystems: Structure and Functi.oning, Dykyjava, D. , and Kvet, J. (ads) . Springer- Verlag, New York, N.Y. . 1978. Wolverton, B.C. and McDonald, R.C. Water Hyacinth Sorption Rates 724.6 175. 16 of Lead. Mercury and Cadmium. In: Compiled Data on the Vascular Aquatic Plant Program: 1975-1977, NASA. National Space Technology Laboratoies, Bay St. Louis, Miss. , March 1978. UPTAKE LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP BOD TSS Bernard, J.M. and Bernard. F.A. , 1977. 440.55 Lawrence, T. . Warder and Ashford, R. Effect of Stage and Height 542.9 of Cutting on the Crude Protein Content and Crude.Protein Yield of Intermediate Wheatgrass, Bromegrass, and Reed Canarygrass. Can. Jouer. Plant Sci . 51 :41 , 1971 . Lawrence, T. , Warder, F.G. , and Ashford, R. , 1977. 240.3 Lawrence, T. . Warder, F.G. , and Ashford, R. , 1977. 124.6 Lawrence, T. , Warder, F.G. , and Ashford, R. , 1977. 738.7 Lawrence. T. . Warder, F.G. , and Ashford, R. . 1977. 836.6 Lawrence, T. . Warder, F.G. , and Ashford. R. . 1977. 605.2 Lawrence, T. , Warder, F.G. , and Ashford, R. , 1977. 1094.7 Lawrence, T. . Warder, F.G. , and Ashford, R. . 1977. 1148. 1 Lawrence. T. , Warder, F.G. , and Ashford. R. , 1977. 388.93 ; Stake, E. Higher Vegetation and Phosphorus in a Small Stream in 8.46 .36 Central Sweden. Schweiterische Zeitschrift fur Hydrologie 30:353, 1968. Nikolajevskij, V.G. Research into the Biology of the Common Reed 712 71 .2 (Phragmites Communis Trin. ) in the U.S.S.R. Folia. Geobot. Phyrotax. 6:221 . 1971 . Mason, C.F. and Bryant, R.J. Production, Nutrient Content and 206.93 16.60 Decomposition of .Phragmites communis Trin. and Typha angustifolia L. Jour. Ecol . (1) :71 , 1975. Ericksson, C. and Mortimer, D.C. Mercury Uptake in Rooted Higher 155.75 17.8 Aquatic Plants: Laboratory Studies, Int. Assoc. Theor. Appl , Limnol , 19:2087 1975. UPTAKE LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP BOD TSS Klopatek, J. . 1978. 153.97 30.26 Klopatek, J. . 1978. 47.43 Varenko, N.I . and 'Chuiko, V.T. Role of Higher Aquatic Plants in 453.01 48.95 the Migration of Manganese, Zinc, Copper and Cobalt in the Dneprodzerzhinsk Reservoir. Hydrobiol . Jour. 7:45, 1971 . Varenko, N.I . and Chuiko, V.T. , 1971 . 316.84 39.83 Varenko, N.I. and Chuiko, V.T. , 1971 . 242.97 Varenko, N.I. and Chuiko. V.T. , 1971 . 442.33 Boyd, C.E. Production, Mineral Nutrient Absorption, and 47.52 Biochemical Assimilation by Justicia americana and Alternanthere philoxerodies. Archiv. Hydrobiol . 66(2) : 139, 1969. Boyd, C.E. , 1969. 87.04 Boyd, C.E. , 1969. 114.28 Prentki , R.T. , Gustafson, T.D. , and Adams, M.S. Nutrient 161.54 32.71 Movements in Lakeshore Marshes. In: Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential . R.E. Good, D.F. Whigham and R.L. Simpson (EDS.) Academic Press, New York, N.Y. , 1978. Prentki , R.T. , Gustafson, T.D. , and Adams, M.S. , 1978. 204.70 15.27 Prentki , R.T. , Gustafson, T.D. , and Adams, M.S. , 1978. 21 .36 Prentki , R.T. , Gustafson, T.D. , and Adams, M.S. , 1978. 38.27 Prentki , R.T. , Gustafson, T.D. , and Adams. M.S. , 1978. 27.59 Bernard, J.M. and Bernard, F.A. Winter Standing Crop and 262.55 42.83 Nutrient Contents in Five Central New York Wetlands. Bull . Torrey Bot. Club 104(1)57, 1977. UPTAK E E LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP BOD TSS Wolverton, B.C. and McDonald, R.C. March 1978. 2019.35 105.36 DeJong, J. The Purification of Wastewater with the Aid of Rush or 240.3 31 . 15 Reed Ponds. In: Biological control of Water Pollution, Tourbier, J. . and Pierson, Jr. R.W. (eds) . University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA. , 1976. DeJong, J. . 1976. 142. 1 17.8 DeJong, J. , 1976. 231 .4 44.5 DeJong, J. . 1976. 284.8 48.95 O'Brien, D.J. and Birkner. F.B. Kinetics of Oxygenation of 316.8 18.25 Reduced Sulfur Species in Aqueous Solution, Environ, Sci , Technol . 11 ( 12) : 1114, 1977. O'Brien, D.J. , and Birkner, F.B. , 1977. 10.95 Van Vleet , E.S. and Quinn, J.G. Input and Fate of Petroleum 185. 12 Hydrocarbons Entering the Providence River and Upper Narragansett Bay from Wastewater Effluents. Environ. Sci . Technol . 11 (2) : 1086, 1977. Gallagher, J.L. and Plumley. F.G. Underground Biomass Profiles 176.25 and Productivity in Atlantic Coastal Marshes. Amer. Jour, Bot. 6669(2) : 156, 1979. Spangler, F.L. , Sloey, W.E. , and Fetter, C.W. Artificial and 181 .55 7. 12 Natural Marshes as Wastewater Treatment systems in Widconsin. In: Freshwater Wetlands and Sewage Effluent Disposal , Tilton, D.L. , Kadtec, R.H. , and Richardson C.J. (eds). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1976. Spangler, F.L. , Sloey.. W.E. , and Fetter. C.W. , 1976. 10.06 Spangler, F.L. , Sloey, W.E. , and Fetter. C.W. , 1976. 32.67 Kardos, L.T. , and Hook, J.E. Phosphorus Balance in Sewage 165.54 39.60 Effluent Treated Soils. Jour. Enviorn. Qual . 5(1):87, 1976. UPTAKE LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP SOD TSS Spangler, F.L. , S1oey, W.E. , and Fetter, C.W. Wastewater 7.03 Treatment By Natural and Artificial Marshes. EPA-600/2-76-207, Springfield, VA, 1976. Spangler, F.L. , Sloey, W.E. , and Fetter, C.W. , 1976. 4,45 Spangler, F.L. , Sloey, W.E. , and Fetter, C.W. , 1976. 3.56 Seidel , K. Macrophytes and Water Purification. In: Biological 28.21 Control of Water Pollution, Tourbier, J. , and Pierson, R.W. , Jr. (eds). University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1976. Seidel , K. 1976. 55.80 Seidel , K. 1976. 52.77 Walker, J.D. , Colwell , R.R„ and Pettakis, L. Bacterial 34.54 Deg,adation of Motor Oil . Jour. Water Poll , Control Fed. 47(8) :2058, 1975. Richardson, C.J. , Tilton, D.L. , Kadlec, J.A. , Chamie, J.P.M. , and 1 .97 Wentz, W.A. Nutrient Dynamics of Northern Wetland Ecosystems. In: Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential , Good, R.E. , Whigham, O.F. , and Simpson, R.L. (eds) . Academic Press, New York, N.Y. , 1978. Boyd, C.E. The Dynamics of Dry Matter and Chemical Substances in 59.81 Juncus effusus Population. Amer. Midlands Natur. 86:28, 1971 . Gordon, D.C. , Jr. , Keizer, P.D. , Hardstaff, W.R. , and Aldous, 5.34 D.G. Fate of Crude Oil on Seawater Contained in Outdoor Tanks. Environ. Sci . Technol . 10(6) :580, 1976. Gordon, D.C. , Jr. , Keizer, P,D. , Hardstaff, W,R. , and Aldous,, 19.49 D.G. , 1976. McNabb, C.D. , Jr, The Potential of Submersed Vascular Plants for 50.28 11 .48 Reclamation of Wastewater in Temperate Zone Ponds. In: Biological Control of Water Pollution, Tourbier J. , and Pierson, R.W. , Jr. (eds) . University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1976. 1 UPTAKE LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP BOD TSS Steward, K.K. Nutrient Removal Potentials of Various Aquatic 7.57 .43 Plants. Hyacinth Control Jour. (Jour. Aquat. Plant Mgmt.) 8(2) :34, 1970. Steward, K.K. , 1970. .70 Steward, K.K. , 1970. .41 Stake, E. Higher Vegetation and Phosphorus in a Small Stream in 79.80 7.98 Central Sweden. Scheitzerische Zeitschrift fur Hydrologie 30:353, 1968. Carignan, R. and Kalff, J. Ouantifiction of the Sediment 6.76 Phosphorus Available to Aquatic Macrophytes. Jour. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36: 1002. 1979. Glandon, R.P. and McNabb, C.D. The Uptake of Boron by Lemna 11 . 17 minor. Aquat. Bot. 4:53, 1978. Grace, J.B. and Wetzel , R.G. The Production Biology of Eurasian 5.34 .53 Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L. ) : A Review. Jour. Aquat . Plant Mgmt. 16: 1 . 1978. Ryan, J.B. , Riemer, D.N. , and Toth, S.J. Effects of Fertilization 3.98 9. 17 on Aquatic Plants, Water and Bottom Sediments. Weed Sci . 29(5) :482, 1972. Ryan, J.B. , Riemer, D.N. , and Toth. S.J. , 1972. 12.90 Gerlaczynska, B. Distribution and Biomass Of Macrophytes in Lake 74.67 3.12 Dgal Maly, Ekologia Polska 21 :743. 1973. Gerlaczynska, B. , 1973. 35.42 10.77 Gerlaczynska, B. . 1973. 17.44 18.07 Adams, M.S. , and McCracken, M.D. Seasonal Production of the 6.43 2.98 Myriophyllum Component of the Littoral of Lake Wingra, Wisconsin. Jour. Ecol . 62(2) :457, 1974. Carpenter, S.R. and Adams, M.S. The Macrophyte Tissue Nutrient 2.75 Pool of a Hardwater Eutrophic Lake: Implications for Macrophyte Harvesting. Aquat. Bot. 3:239, 1977. UPTAKE LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP BOD TSS Saeger, V.W. and Thompson, Q.E. Biodegradability of Hlogen- 50.08 11 .56 Substitted Diphenylmethanes. Environ. Sci , Technol . 14(6) :705, 1980. Boyd, C.E. Production, Mineral Accumulation and Pigment 29.2 Concentrations in Typha latifolia and Scirpus americanus. Ecology 51(1) :285, 1970. Boyd, C.E. , 1970. 1 .73 Boyd, C.E. and Walley, W.W. Studies of the Biogeochemistry of 57.80 62.42 Boron: I Concentrations in Surface Waters, Rainfall and Aquatic Plans. Amer. Midlands Natur. 88(1): 1 , 1972. Willenbring, Peter R. Wetland Treatment Systems - Why do Some 16.07 4.5 1214.5 Work Better than Others? Lake and Reservoir Management: Practical Applications. Willenbring, Peter R. 40. 16 17.86 6304.6 Willenbring, Peter R. 86.6 5.36 3277.3 Willenbring, Peter R. 2.7 10.71 4661 .5 Willenbring, Peter R. 14.3 17.85 750. 1 Prentki , R. I. , Gustafson, T.D. , and Adams, M.S. . 1978. 34.41 Nutrient movements in lakeshore marshes. In: Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential , R.E. Good., D.F. Whigham, and R.L. Simpson, (ads) . Academic Press, New York, pp. 169-194. Klopatek, J.M. , 1975. The Role of Emergent Macrophytes in 52.1 Mineral Cycling iM a Freshwater Marsh. Proc. Mineral Cycling in Southeastern Ecosystems, pp. 367-393. Steward. K.K. and Ornes, W.H. , 1973. Assessing the Capability 1 .77 of the Everglades Marsh Environment for Renovating Wastewater. Final Report, South Florida Environmental Project: Ecological Report No. DI-SFEP-74-06, USDI, NPS, 13 pp. Gaudet, J.J. , 1977. Uptake, Accumulation and Loss of Nutrients 76.67 by Papyrus in Tropical Swamps. Ecol . 58(2) :415-422. UPTAKE LBS/ACRE/YEAR TN TP BOD TSS Boyd, C.E. , 1970. Production, Mineral Accumulation and Pigment 0. 19 Concentration in TYpha latifolia and Scirpus americanus. Boyd. C.E. , 1970. 0.05 Richardson, C.J. , Tilton, D.L. , Kadlec, J.A. , Chamie. J.P.M. , and 1 .67 Wentz, W.A. , 1978. Nutrient dynamics . in northern wetland ecosystems. In: Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential , Good, R.E. , Whigham, D.F„ and Simpson, R.L. (eds) . Academic Press, New York, pp. 169-194. Brinson, M.M. , and Davis, G.J. , 1976. Primary Productivity and 0.09 Mineral Cycling in Aouatic Macrophyte Communities of the Chowan River, North Carolina. Water Resources Research Institute, U^.iversity of North Carolina Report No. 120, 137 pp. B - OBSERVATION WELL DATA BY BARTER AND NYE t �RovNpLcJ� T��2 D,C SERV,-)T70n/ / 7y o f obs, we// _ /3,56 (/�i 6, ✓, D, ' D TI m E 7DFPTH G',\,</ Tb WATEi2 eL Ly✓. ' 2•zz-88 //;/SArrt ys" .�3/ `• 2-Z4-SS 3:/o PM /oa " s,ZZ a-2s-86 NooN y9� „ 5,Z7 -29-08 /,'SoFM /oo " s 2Z. ' 3-ZZ-fl6 II Uo Afn ICP 5,06 Z. S.OL ' q -S-88 /l,' 9dAm /dZ " 5,ob 1 i -r---- - _- -�` l 1 ,13 i �oJ,'VDCU 7-Z/1 O43s ale ufrnvN Lor /s £/5-4 -top o1 ob-S WcI l : = ( 1 46 CIJ.�o,V. :D 7 T.I M E 7'p WArIErZ E LEV. a- z=B 8 //;is lglll 78 so lain 78 " 4.9 1323-88. //�C�A/N Gory y 9 --S� 86 11'.90 Rm cpcy s fi i+r= ' C - PEAT PROBES REPORT AND OBSERVATION HOLE LEGS BY BSC/CAPE COD SURVEY ' MEMOR XDC�i ' To: Arlene t%ilson From: C.J . Knuth Job C-1040-2 ' Subject:' Peat Probes , Beech Leaf Landing, Centerville , Pia. Date: 2-24-83 ' Peat Probes were performed in the area where the proposed roadway layout intersects an unnamed brook and where it comes into contact with low-lying wetland type soils. Method - A 1 diameter steel rod was pushed through the surface soils until granular soils were encountered. Approximately 20 ' ' north and south of the proposed roadway was probed. Location - The location of each probe was estimated in the field and flagged with blue markers. Field survey may be used to locate ' each if necessary. Please refer to the attached location plan for approximate reference. Conditions - The area immediately surrounding the intersection of ' the proposed roadway and the brook indicated that groundwater was at or near the ground surface during the wettest periods of the year (wetland vegetation) . The trees in this area had small ' mound-like soil regions at their bases, showing the decomposition of the surrounding soils due to frequent flooding. The low-lying areas between these trees revealed the thickest accumulations of ' muck. (composition: organics, silt and clay) The other areas probed (further east) were similar, but they showed thinner accumulations of organic muck. Please note that some of the areas probed revealed a lower organic content. These have been indicated on the attached ' probe chart. Site Implications - Because of the organic nature of the soils i existing beneath the proposed roadway, we would suggest its removal and replacement with. clean granular fill . The fill should meet the Mass. D.P.W. specs for gravel borrow and it should be properly compacted. Drainage along the roadway should be properly channelled into velocity dispursion pools to prevent ponding and erosion. ' Please refer to the attached plan for each location. Cape Cod Survey Covsultan's L 1 ' ?FAT PROBE CHART 1 PROBE = DEPTH OF SATURATED SOILL 1 2211 ' 2 5511 3 1311 4 . . . . . . . . 1811 1 5 . 3811 6 811 7 1811 8 811 (low organic content) 9 911 (low organic content) 10 2611 1 11 . 181 12 1411 13 1311 14 311 ' 15 311 16 . . . . . 811 17 1511 1 18 211 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 Cape Cod Survey Consultants ' CAPE COD SURVEY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 76 ENTERPRISE RD. HYANNIS , MA. 02601 S t t �I ROAD PR oPos 16 } t4 f 18 /S(� i o I� 417 o >; i . i \\ 1 Peat Probe Locations ' Beech Leaf Landing Centetville, Mass. PROJ. NO. S H E E T NO. ' JOB NO.C-1040-2 SUBJECT Silvia s Silvia PARTY Wilson, Collins CAPE COD a � LpCAT ION Eieecin Lea` , Centervi]INSPECTOR SURVEY CONSULTANTSI 7 S� 76 ENTERPRISE ROAD ' WEATHER DATE 1/27/83 HYANNMq. MASS. 02601 TP* 3 TP* 4 GRD. ELEV GRD. ELEV. WS. ELEV. wS ELEV 0 Organic topsoil sandy soil Organic topsoil sandy soil mix with oxidation. fill transition dark organics 2 and fill sandv - dark brown-black peat light to greenish sand 3 with silt s blue-green sandy clay 5. 5 ® oxidized _ _ _ _ 5 . 5� 6 with sand and gravel . coarse oxidized sand T mixed blue-green medium sand with some gravel 8 9 II 12 TPt TPA START PRESOAK, END PRESOAK SHOW PERC. TIME AT 12 OR ( ) HOLE ON TIME AT 9 OR ( ) SOIL LAG TIME AT liw OR ELAPSED TIME 9" - 6' iRATE MIN / IN GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS : ' = seasonal maxim= ground water elevation ' observed ground water elevation sample location and number FILLD 5I'rE'r 1 OF 2 SHEETS ' JOB NO. C-1040-2 ' SUBJECT Silvia s Silvia PARTY Collins , Wilson CA PE COD` s LOCATION Beech Leaf, CenterviNSFIECTOR SURVEY CONSULTANTS S 76 ENTERPRISE ROAD ' WEATHER s"�'r air DATE 1/27/83 HYANNIS, MASS. 02601 TPA 5 TP# 6 ' R ELEV GRD: ELEV G D EL _ ' W.S. ELEV WS ELEV 0 HUMUS ZONE HUIMUSNi- ' grey podzolic soil yellow subsoil 1 2 yellow subsoil ' yellow medium sand 3 mixed sand and gravel 3 . 5 ' 4 4 .5 . S mixed sand and gravel 6 6 . 0 - T 8 II ' 12 TPs TPM START PRESOAK NOTE= ' ENO PRESOAK SHOW PERC. TIME AT 12 OR ( ) HOLE ON TIME AT 9 OR ( ) SOIL LAG ' TIME AT 6 OR ELAPSED TIME 9~ - 6" M N ( W ) RATE MIN / IN GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS : = seaso.nal maxim-am ground water elevation = observed ground water elevation ' = sa;nple location and number FIELD ;IjrFl 2 OF 2 SHEETS 14l- 91'�p�.r,• C.f^LY"'�>:ic�1 �.F-,--�+�'•' .�;Y"4 -n.0 ,t qs .. <,,K..-.zRi•°�ia$at ' ---- ---_ i----------- j 'WD. POSTS j �_ - APFROX.s�tSC•vim= ^ -•------------ �_ To Nyz. SECTIc)QTNRU CULT ^� \ tC • •b _' .._8. PR.O,I?..'yX�SCX'LCILVERT:"' �/ M� �"CI�:2Ft gP,Sl►.1S. __ .} ,� � i t j.. �"-: .n (1 ,s••sr:� w 3 .�.-�-ri� . 1 •1 X r4� ,r--•>— .yJ� - t ti �>.�si2 �-S x r u��f.. », {.�.r,'i•Y••i•'�i'.`. •'�"'r f.! 4 i :� _t, ��,y�� ,c L. �'Sr� - ... --"a rnr m "• _ e 6 s.e�. 1 �''.✓ t •j �. �?;; l�:�t� �j yr '741^'15� �Ji'F S�j- -�•• s 7�v�+-'�`_' „ M�?,,•l p 7; -��h •D4+- -5 i �i4ar" :n'"� �. _7 2! s- ..� .--•.. -e -F�+.r '-c7:P -'� � �7-1-'!'Sy�•iLX` i1 R.=Ys* � ,, C _ 7C� .,c, t� •p - -i Mi {..�' _� -_.r_--1.• x4 ,��_ .t+.w M�� •«�,�. ��t4.t �}�y,,,Y !� _ t Wsy p � :- `t iT°' .-'> ,« � 3�+ L♦ �Yf fir► ti � ? J zp b. >.w I r f\s- •.! �rL � i sA y •'� .-,-s--T '� s_�•_ T•'a Y� - Ir �?i.�> '�.. '• F--� � L ,:��13' •�",`'�'• ram:.:•-� :t._._:�' '-'�- a' _ :. II, D - INDICATOR SPECIES LIST AND SITE REPORT t I Site: lots 14/15 Beach Leaf Landing (2.0292 .0) Date: 10/27/87 ' Weather : Overcast; +50 F Site was visited for the purpose of flagging wetlands in accordance with the requirements of MGL Ch 131 Sec 40. No flagging from previous work by ' others was. found. Orange and black striped flagging was used to identify wetland limits. ' The site was entered adjacent to the culvert road crossing. The wetland line as flagged by this reporter and confirmed by DEQE under previous proceedings was used as a point of beginning. ' The wetland at the site is a mature red maple swamp in an area underlaid with soft clay and silty sand with a shallow overlying organic layer. Vegetation includes a sporadic ground layer dominated by shagnum moss and ' skunk cabbage. The shrub layer has less then 30% closure and is dominated by highbush blueberry. The overstory is +90% red maple and +10% white cedar. ' There is a transition zone including a moderate slope .rising from the swamp proper. This area has an overstory dominated by facultative plants including red maple and tupelo; a shrub lay of transitional species including azalea, pepperbush, inkberry, and sheep laurel, with huckleberry, osier dogwood, sassafrass saplings and American holly. The ground layer is upland dominant with wintergreen being the most common ' plant and including princess pine, star moss and false auralea. Our methodology for wetlands delineation is based on having a dominance of wetland species in a majority of existing vegetative layers. Because the ' ground and shrub layers are not dominated by obligate wetland species and because only faculatitive species occur in the overstory, along with 20-30% upland species including white oak, white pine, pitch pine, American Holly and sassafras, it was determined that the area was transitional but not a true wetland. Prepared by, A.M. WILSON ASS IATES, INC. ' f Arlene M. ilson ' 9amw30 A . M . W I L S O N , ASSOCIATES , I N C . ' INDICATOR SPECIES LIST - lots 14/15 Beech Leaf Island Road, Centerville ' Upland Woods white oak-----------Quercus alba pin oak------------Quercus palustris red oak------------Quercus Tuba pitch pine---------Pinus rigida white pine---------Pinus strobus ' red cedar----------Juniperus virginiana black cherry-------Pruny serotina red maple----------Acer rubrum tupelo-------------Nyssa sylvatica ' sassafras----------Sassafras albidum huckleberry--------Gaylussacia baccata dwarf huckleberry--Gaylussacia dumosa ' sweet pepperbush---Clethra alnifolia highbush blueberry-Vaccinum corymbosum swamp azalea-------Rhododendron viscosum ' greenbrier---------Smilax rotundifolia inkberry-----------Ilex glabra false auralea------Aralia nudicaulis wintergreen Gaultheria procumbens ' princess pine------Lycopodium complanatam star mo'ss---------- sphagnum moss------Sphagnum sp i ' A . M . W I L S O N , ASSOCIATES , I N C . n Transitional Wood red maple-------------------Acer rubrum tupelo----------------------Nyssa sylvatica white pine------------------Pinus strobus pitch pine------------------Pinus rigida white cedar-----------------Chamaecyparis thoides white oak-------------------Quercus alba pin oak----------------------Ilex opaca American holly--------------Kalmia angustifolia sassafras-------------------Sassafras albidum osier dogwood---------------Cornus alternifolia inkberry--------------------Ilex glabra .sheep laurel----------------Kalmia angustifolia highbush blueberry----------Vaccinium corymbosum sweet pepperbush------------Clethra alnifolia huckleberry-----------------Gaylussacia baccata swamp azalea----------------Rhododedron viscosum greenbrier------------------Smilex rotundifolia wintergreen-----------------Gaultheria procumbens I false auralea---------------Aralia nudicaulis lady slipper----------------Cypripedium acaule golden rod------------------Solidego spp. Wooded Swamp red maple ------------------Acer rubrum white cedar-----------------Chamaecyparis thoides tupelo----------------------Nyssa sylvatca highbush blueberry----------Vaccinuim corymbosum sweet pepperbush------------Clethra alnifolia swamp azalea----------------Rhododendron viscosum inkberry--------------------Ilex glabra ' cinnamon fern------------ Osmunda cinnamomea skunk cabbage------------ --Symplocarpus foetidus sensitive fern--------------Onoclea sensibilis sphagnum moss---------------Sphagnum sp ' A . M . W I L S O N , ASSOCIATES , I N C . - - ( vi z z f� Revisions: DATE DESCRIPTION maw _ ScvooF� SAYI-LocLis YOA a`N 0 .p /' G LOCUS MAP ANN SCALE 1" = 2000' ' References: Q + ' SITE PLAN LOTS 14 & 14 A Qp{ BEACH LEAF ISLAND ROAD L-0 BAXTER & NYE, INC., 2-112188 1 , Q 0) Q r Lki OWO SITE PLAN LOTS 15a 15 A �� BEACH LEAF ISLAND ROAD BAXTER & NYE, INC., 2110188 GE OF -4 LO �Q_�' # Project Title: O (O O , �a � i \ \��4 , __J BEACH LEAF \ "'A —� + �} � �,, - �` ` ,' � ISLAND I )GE -9F— — _ WETt-0 i \ NOTES 1 ) ELEVATIONS BASED ON N.G.V.D. `` \ - �s— � LOTS 2)FLOOD ZONE A 10 (EL. I I N.G.VD.) EDGE \\ - 35 OP 41 J Sp 2E�K ,-,--''_ PRd E� 0��E— , P PRopoE 1 GAR AGE PA �Pq ODOs j pB / , SLpB (13.2) OR�VE \ `pPQSED HOUSE PR DR02 0� cq -1' — 7 7' ,TOP LLJ O,o 4.p .�041 y 00 \ PREPARED FOR: 06 \ _ I .3 p POsSaviCE' SILVIA 8s SILVIA ° wp�ER � Cb v ASSOCIATES, INC. m � O t — W O O 12 m ---- �� ROAD i 7- eo, c N S E A B A a3 ' A.M. Wilson 94 Associates PROPCOSED / Inc. - R- SERVICE HYDRANT .- — — - Fw TLAND� _ _ - - 911 Main Street LEGEND ; �\ J E p G E� O Osterville/M A 02655 EXISTING CONTOUR 617-428-1450 EXISTING ELEVATION 9.5 -� / PROPOSED CONTOUR — \ Drawing Title: PROPOSED ELEVATION (9.5) EDGE OF WETLAND 1 � 0 SITE PLAN QJ w a eav►OtoN L.. 7/Z7 /8g Scale: 1 20' Q --- ----- FEET Date: 717188 Dwg NO: Design: AMW/JAR/MJD Check: RFD Drawn: JAR/MJD Job No:2. 0292.0 Sheet I of 3 SOIL TEST PIT DATA. -MANHOLE COVER TO FINISH GRADE 1 NO. OF OUTLETS._3 FINISHED GRADE Revisions r-- 15/ 2 NOTES: DATE DESCRIPTION INDICATES -- - I FILL AND LOAhW INDICATES OBSERVED I 12 MIN �� I. DISTRIBUTION BOX TO WITHSTAND H-10 .. PLUG ENDS PERC �_ COVER 6 r - -- LOADING UNLESS UNDER PAVEMENT, DRIVE _ 4 PERFORATED_PVC S :0005 GROUNDWATER ----- - -- I � OR TRAVELED WAYS WHEREBY H-20 LOAD/h(, TEST _ '. R- n SHALL APPLY. - - - - - - - - - r 12" kV INLET II I 15% tj r 00 too $��q'� �tTEE j 2 2. PROVIDE INLET TEE AS SHOWN WHERE LEVEL BOTTOM EFFECTIVE WK TP No. TP No. - " LCME W)TE2)J SLOPE OF INLET PIPE EXCEEDS 0.08 FT/FT , I'-6" L OR 1N A PUMPED SYSTEM. GRD.EL. 13.8 GRD.EL.-_ - - 6 3 I -$ - -- ,I PRECAST, STEEL w- � -1„ j. FIRST TWO FEET OF PIPE OUT OF THE 735 GW.EL. 5' I GW.EL. REINFORCED SEPTIC TANK - � 5' INLET � OUTLET -' .� PLAN VFW DISTRIBUTION BOX TO BE LAID LEVEL. 0 13 8 0 -- - 4'-9" TEE 4-0" MIN. TEE 6-I 4. RECOMMENDED MANUFACTURER - PROFILE LOAM 81 LIQUID DEPTH ROTONDO OR 4PPROVED EQUAL. 1 SUBSOIL 1 6 MIN. TO I I/2 STONE 13/411 REMOVABLE COVER MEASURE SLOPE AT THIS POINT L - - - - - - _ - - - - - ' GIST=150aSLOPE �. . 5"DIA OUTLET(S) 2 t r q� LOAM AND - --- -- 11.3 Qy� BOTTOM ON LEVEL STABLE BASE X 2 PROVIDE 3 . 0 0 0 0 00 of 6" Y 2°/ MIN. FINISH GRADE SEED SANDY 3 24"DIA MANHOLE COVER \ ° . WATERTIGHT -� 12' - GRAVEL 41"INLET JOINTS (TYP) I I ' - -- - - - - :::: MIN 4 4 PLAN VIEW CROSS SECTION VIEW I,-2,,, 4 OUTLET I O I y� 2.0' 2"MIN OF 1/8"TC References: - - 1 _ 1 " I ' 1/2 WASHED STONE 5 ------------- 8.8 5 NOTES 7 2 2 5/2 I 1 5"DIA 15 SEE SHEET I OF 3 MEDIUM 1. SEPTIC TANK TO WITHSTAND H-10 LOADING 3. INLET AND OUTLET TEES TO BE CAST IRON. _� TT M N ` INLET 6 6 UNLESS UNDER PAVEMENT. DRIVES OR TRAVELED SCHEDULE 40 PVC OR CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE. -- BO 0 O �2 - SAND WAYS. WHERE BY H-20 LOADING SHALL APPLY. TEES TO BE CENTERED UNDER MANHOLE COVER. 2"-�-�� t' �,• LEVEL,STABLE qt 4vO +�- +� 3/4 70 I I/2 DOUBI F BASE r SLOPE _ �- (fyp.) CLEAR WASHED STONE (no t net) 7 7 2. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS AND CONCRETE CON- 4. RECOMMENDED MANUFACTURER - ROTONDO OR 6 MIN. 3/4' TO yp) STRUCTION TO BE IIATERTIGHT APPROVED EQUAL. CROSS SECTION VIEW I I/2" STONE CROSS SECTION VIEW 8 g H- 2 G - - --- - - -- g - 5.1 g SEPTIC TANK DETAIL NO. OF GALLONS: 1500 DISTRIBUTION BOX DETAIL LEACHING TRENCH DETAIL LOCUS MAP Q. NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE SCALE 1 '081 N 10 BOTTOM_ OF HOLE _ 3 8 10 11 11 DESIGN ANALYSIS 12 P- 4966 12 ---i SYSTEM PROFILE DESIGN FLOW: DATE: I I/13/85 DATE: NO)T Ti O SCALE 3 BEDROOMS X 110 GPD/BDRM = 330 GPD ------------ TEST BY: PETER SULLIVAN TEST BY: BAXTER Q NYE - - P,nit WITNESSED BY: WITNESSED BY: MANHOLE AND COVER BROUGHT JIM CONLON _ _ TO FINISHED GRADE SEPTIC TANK REQUIREMENTS: PERC. RATE: PERC RATE: FINISH GRADE / FINISH GRADE TO HAVE MIN. 2% 330 GPD X 150 % = 495 GAL. 2 _M/N./INCH _MIN.//NCH TOP FOUNDATION=14.50 / SLOPE OVER LEACHING FACILITY USE 1500 GAL. TANK BEACH LEAF V11 - - �� FIRST TWO FEET TO BE LAID LEVEL I S L A N D a I/8"/FT + 1/8"/ FT--- I MIN. COVER TP No. TP No. -_-__ I/8"/F T GRD.EL. GRD.EL. - --- R 0 A D 12.28 12.03 1 I.'98 S=0.005 -A' GW.EL. GW.EL. n I� �`� 1 1.60 0 0 C p 1500 GAL. _ _--� LEACHING FACILITY REQUIREMENTS:330 GPD 12.40 - D1 STRIBUTION 11.78 1 1 p CONCRETE TANK SEPTIC . BOX TRENCH-1.5' DEEP X 2' WIDE L 0 T BOTTOM=10.1 o "�. D • H-20 TO BE INSTALLED ON A SIDE AREA 1.51(2) 1= 3.0 SF/LF (2.5)GPD/SF= 7.5 GPD/LF 2 2 LEVEL, STABLE BASE --- - 14 & 14 A 3 3 BOTTOM AREA 2(1)=2.OSF/LF(I.0)GPD/SF= 2.0 GPD/LF 0 5. 1 OBSERVED G.W. 5.0 SF/LF 9.5 GPD/LF 4 4 - -- _ 330 GPD =9.5 GPD/LF = 34.7' S 5 ------ USE 35' TRENCH s s NOTES 7 7 � I ) .SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN A GROUNDWATER 1-.'ACHING FACILITY PROVIDED: ADJUSTMENT ZONE. TRENCH- 1.5' DEEP X 2' WIDE X 35' LONG 8 8 j 2) IF ENCOUNTERED, ALL UNSUITABLE SOIL WiTHIN 10' g g CIF THE LEACHING FACILITY SHALL BE REMOVED REQUIRED 3.30 GPD AND REPLACED WITH CLEAN SAND AND GRAVEL. PROVIDED 175SF 332 GPD 1 10 11 11 12 12 NOTES DATE. DATE. 1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONSTRU(' TION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL CONTEST BY: TEST BY. FORM TO TITLE V OF THE STATE ENVJRON - - .MENTAL CODE AND ANY APPLICABLE LOCA1 WITNESSED BY. WITNESSED BY. RULES AND REGULATIONS. -- --- - ? GROUT TO BE USED AT ALL POINTS WHERE PERC. RATE: PERC. RATE: PIPES ENTER OR LEAVE ALL CONCRETE MIN.//NCH MIN./INCH ST)tUCTURES IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A WATER ---- - TIGHT SEAL. 3 ALL SHIPLAP JOINTS IN SEPTIC TANK SHALL A. M. WILSON , ASSOCIATES INC. BE SEALED WITH NEOPRENE GASKETS OR 9 1 1 M A I N STREET INVERT ELEVATIONS ASPHALT CEMENT TO PROVIDE A WATERTIGHT SEAL. OSTERVILLE , MA 4 PRECAST CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK, DISTRIBU 42 8- 1450 TION BOX. AND LEACHING FACILITY TO WITH 4" INVERT AT BUILDING 12.40 STAND H-10 LOADING UNLESS UNDER PAVE- 4" INVERT AT SEPTIC TANK (in) 12.28 MENT. DRIVES OR TRAVELLED WAYS WHEREIN H-20 LOADING SHALL APPLY. PREPARED FOR 4"INVERT AT SEPTIC TANK (out) 12.03 A[ [ PIPES IN THE SYSTEM SHALL BE SCHED- 4" INVERT AT DIST. BOX (in) 11.98 ('I.f 40 OR EQUAL. a" INVERT AT DIST BOX (our) 11.8 I n WASHED CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE FREE OF S I L V I A & S I LV I A _- ALL DIRT. DUST AND FINES. ASSOCIATES 7 AT ALL POINTS OF INTERSECTION OF WATER INVERTS AT LEACHING FACILITY. LINES AND SEWER LINES, BOTH PIPES SHALL INC. BE CONSTRUCTED OF CLASS 150 PRESSURE 4" INVERT AT BEGINNING OF LEACHING FACILITY 11.78 PIPE AND ARE TO BE PRESSURE TESTED TO - ASSURE WATERTIGHTNESS. 4" INVERT AT END OF LEACHING FACILITY 11.60 8SEPTIC TANK DISTRIBUTION BOX. ETC. , - SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY ROTUNDO OR ELEVATION AT BOTTOM OF AN EQUIVALENT MANUFACTURER. LEACHING FACILITY 10.1 SUBSURFACE -_ 9 EXCAVATE ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IN LEACHING AREA AND BACKFILL WITH CLEAN OBSERVED GROUND WATER � I GRAVEL OR COARSE SAND. ELEI"ATION 10 HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED SEWAGE TO OPERATE OVER THE LIMITS OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS DURING THE DISPOSAL DESIGN COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SYSTEMS. II NO FIELD MODIFICATIONS TO THE SEWAGE " DISPOSAL SYSTEM SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT +�'°�r`� ' PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER R09ERT ` '' AND THE LOCAL BOARD OF HEALTH. 12 THIS SYSTEM SHALL BE INSPECTED AS RE- DAVLOR a QUIRED BY SECTION 2.10 OF.TITLE V. ! -� =3741 13 A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE AS RE- QUIRED BY SECTION 2.8 OF TITLE V MUST BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UPON COM- PLETIONOF THE ABOVE WORK. IF AN "AS BUILT" PLAN IS REQUIRED DUE TO CONTRAC- Scale 1 = AS NOTED TOR DEVIATING FROM THESE PLANS, WORK FOR SUCH "AS BUILT" PLANS SHALL BE COMPENSATED BY THE CONTRACTOR. - FEE 14 THIS SYSTEM IS NOT DESIGNED FOR A GARBAGE DISPOSAL UNIT. -- -- Date 7/88 Dwg No 15 ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON N G VD Design MJD N DATUM. Check . RFD N Drawn MJ D Job No 2.0292.0 Sheet � of 3 z z m i tt U\ I , � I I W�f / / Q/ r J l,•�,�0. Lows It f VJ4 NO TEs I Dsa Tura . /V. 6. V. D I - ��' � ... ' '• ` �I � 1 :ter d c - /O 1 I i .,I! / i 3 rcvao zo,vc A /o �E/cam //,o N.G.v, D� I,n•I 1l1 ' r• 19" all I I ��nc/ ~.1✓OOU/- •00//ri /i e : sll I T I•;; I I , t r +..I d fir': IIl + r•,�._ �(` `3 - I / / l �o t /+n e:. . I 1 r,' '' Sf crlcvunf¢�cq// a// f/r!J✓lib/c ' ! '` !.'yl , I / _ / / / 5, /�// CGi,r'Yr✓c hor, int/J,oc�S lrrr�/ sirs./r/ ,/♦ /_: hrNl.•.,..' a-/h•// 40 nc.ri6v`06400 i �'f�.Yl �. + / !� ' �`% pl /.� ' I / / / co,,fn..,+ ro ire/a 1p �t Qt� T t/c art o/ /oca/ ' �Rolo a•av nu/ != ?;I Il / o f f/co /i �rG/u/a f, r s . / /3 0.+r�f /f o I Ay /, /J// �i-c cy�t str•vc>Jvrc.S �r`is// be •./.::.�..,c c/ h( 14 Sh•// he r•c�/sCtG✓ W/fjl r' O�Il� \ ! / / / / _ a- for / ✓c A •4-O c/ran .J.+nd s` fi/'AI/t/ /n �r�, r 0 /�� l I � / � � �\c / � f I FGLorc./q+lrc ur/v4 r / �/ ,a c cc � rt!ih @ ,tii. To/ V✓c// _ /.3.Sr: �Al V, D� \ I. Ih; I;i ;I q r, (�' :3 1 I I I S.p fi �p �OTS �1 Vf//?//JNCE /S REC�U/RED /=/•�2O/ll I is �,,,r , •9�/, .$F r�1,E ,C�f/RIV5 7-11341 L- Q 0,41 RD o � _ ... _. . 1 ' ' I — / I fir- A c. TN IZ69- UL A rioN (rnd y z�, /9&.5) - ! Tc.S r ti lip ` ..�.. I. o I ; No/� ' i _ o I .� Rrcg U/R//V G /0 0 f=EET- Fi 01-1; N i,1 "? ' w Jh ►' 0 YvEr�f;IV ro H LEAC/4i/vG F'fJCZ L q 1 ;� �� I f� tl I "� �.`h►s`; I I I �, I � TNE /-�i�Of�U,iErD !EFI CH/NG 7"/?c;NCf- I ' �r Wel.�. ;: ! y:• I'i �� o v ,., �oc/gr 6U 77 FRorrl �a W� TLA/�/O, i I I ' I •�i 1 •�,i'•I '� 'j,fl �j' \ 1 ` I 1' h ' '' I U I ./l 147/'< •�i`I L. _ �/� L•�.� f' ..:G�/ _:7(%4. _�'�..,r.--�•- --_ - -•--- .. - -_ r I >•Iln''-. ' ---' I w, PjY, IN�j,a , I. •I,. 1 , r v ,.T •,• � 1 I r 1 I _ -- - _ _ __.. .. ._. ' � 1 ---- - Kj N. hS+ � . i �r, rn t •�' .�•� � l Q \ \ C C:r^tt f� 7`/�J /` /7)c �rc�lcLcc� G/w c /,//n y S hoc.�r, I 't it i ;% ` • J r\ \ corri / s cuitlr hhc .s,c%/,i,c .amc/Ja�tri6n�f[ I '•r ju•''ti r: y ° a o ' \ icfn,r�r,rr+, >'S of o'f7c Town of 0.?rr/af:.. 6le- Jrrc/ /o ca /c a/ w,t>;,,n ,/-!,c '/oocJOO.)/a ir/ , I I I \ 1 , p JAI 1 1 t • cD E5 T / )r•SUL T.s o,► r �/ u �•' I'," ;: F T TE'M PROF/LE •III � :E� �,',I:.;I ?�r.., �� . .. -000' iill ;,,�• L oa / o:o T T Jill., ?' t I' I i m I M,n. Go.Jclr- -- - — ", - / E (./� I I .4DQ 'r /Vov }' TEST .O ✓t Prf r., �..//r u�r, /,V✓ -- -- -- - -- -� .�J 1^!'% ' 1✓nx /NV -- �`///✓ _ AorV �•r I 30"� W/TiVf55 • rrr Low,/Orr , +�,(', /D.007 /i /O.gJr /tip �..ENTE III V/LLE / 01,4S5. /a.le 4 4r /Orcloa rc d f v r I I I Sr;nc�y I SYSTEM DESIGN Gn �L ' — -- STL VTA � S IL VIA SSO Uk T--S /YC c)6m G.1A/. mL 5,1 C bcLlcoo,v\ 151n21c F"l-w- ly 1 No GarL•t JS� C�rutcicr J + 5r.9 / harm 220 GpC SCALE 1 = ad DP7G m�aN„rr, 5 F N Tr c TANK 2 Z o x 150 c7c, LZ<ICAIP.15 / fir`/VC// UE- TH/L U L / D(3 TAIV ;� �,��. :;::< . • ��,cr.OF -Yr L`��Ci-1//VG SYsre/�1 I ,'y, +J ;,,, l•`:T, I O d r Nl�fi `t ST: ' i:h �ryC:'.r• .! ��r •1O Pc,'f: l vcIon r,.r RIG D i ✓ T I! II - - .;11 � CAX7ER w��; � g VVIL - -- SID►cWALL 2x '/-L K 2c1 �. L, G�cI�S/ F7C,) �rl(�� 1 h' c I I 4 T•T'O Yl L 7 .O C� i F = 3 i ti::, J"' (�Q 2:1iWs r liar i1:rl .� �• /�/071t 7/i .rcw , . noC W"hc I / G GF�D TCv�� P d �rvr+c �P > E /s / Sv/2 4�o S I ai I I. p . ; i 9 C/.37M i'C,N�' ` ! �j:\' /,�i• `� S./ / LMN l/ �f - '•., . �l' <:fs! , o`• G.W. .. I� +c 2 _b" r�Y Ir )yurlj X � � a - 2 a I, I .11 .y,,�•�� j� � � `his � AI /�1 ✓/ J � � •.'� L 'I 50+I►,o r. •. V l L �N 6/VEER S �/V0'C- : I/ rn� �,d '�crr.� �S7"C2V/LLE', /�,955/9C�/USET'rs I ' , I - rwhW�..IWrNw�.i w ..+.�Y�/�Vw..M^... r_ ...n.-rrrww w.r +v.r--wwn.r_.w...w wrl. wsw rw.l.wr.w.w.-rv.....rr, ...,..-..►_ -..rw.... tirvrr / �/ ' r , N uOA R) R SchoO'' Sc"Gucr Y ��'I-`/ t-� ��'` /4!/o1 y o qe w bE-7�rr'�.. / v NO rf1A - � •1 y �• -tJTr' 0 t L Of, S 1,e�7Ap 0000 B Ede No res DR Tvtn . ,v.G.v. D 1 f � ZRU- � , ' /% ? / 3 r-LC7Go ZaNE /o CE/cam //,o MG,V, -D) Odnc/ i°..2$0001- 00/6c .� � � � � 1 I •�. Th/s /✓/a n �: .,d t -�o be vs c� tib G/e frr.r///i e %q// Sf c.�coun�`r/-ec/� u// u�sui/uG/c z / / 5. co.�5rrvchar� rncfhoa05 Gr,�/ .//�+t�cr^/a /. �h2// Tr07 n f./ /OC.i/ Gu/f'�/✓/ G /O / ZOIIQ Q'/bU/tO /3oar-r.l o� v r -✓ Me /cach/n' cib OILY4,-z c/ / ` � � / l / � 1 f l / / / � / 6 /a// /Urc cast strvcfvrc si/a// be ci/carr�c c/ - hall be ra /aces✓ w/f-h � M v � / GX 7. occordo,lrc u,IL4 /7WC JL. y. � /� Y / l / (b G $, Tv/o o f 6 b..cruo ti oa We// _ /3.3G C/✓.G.t/, DJ �., 01f , 1 'F ' I �►I / S p i - / � I`I /J/l1 L C �8 L ,C3 OA R,O O `A9/ F i r/ A3f-iR1V57-4)A3L FEEr /4 1 J: I o e We r4 A"40 TO L E A C/-1 II JG C 14 J IL tic �rcvascc✓ o/ut�c///n� shover, t L-uI V4 fire ..s"Ichn,c - 0 of t`Ic Towr, of ,41e 1 J a�; \ 1 ��• 1 ` 1 DATE _ q / SO/L TES r 7-OP Of AVN y; SYSTFM PROF/LE is's * . I-or" LoaM I YN,n. Go�JGr .00 " L .k^40 Pc f IG — ' �.St. Sub�o�i DRTi% Nov. /3 /98S' — I TEST 4 Y/: 10c A-,- Su//i uar) �/,V"2 S //DN.9V5 //Dn,/v9S Zo /N✓ scphc 9:; //,92 Td/ k EL /J��!/"'� �it,.�►�'^7y I" �•.: �..I }1 I�I� r Q-1 , /tip F i Sa.,c►y SY STEM DESIGN 5TL VfA S IL vzA A sso CIoca-,!�- c-, -Tly,- oblo No C-iarl,ajc, Gr,-tcicr G 'L3�f rms .� 1 1 gQ�1 bdrm 2 ZO G pcl SC A l.-1a zoo D,p7c- Fo-z 12 I � 9 ab ' RSV Z-/y-88 S,A•V✓, 'i YYlcdiu,'n SEPTIC TANK 2Z.O x ISc)7,, _ �30 S1na1 Z-z:Wc ///1/G T/ZE/VCH DE--TA/L USC /S�� 1,6FACNIIVG 5Ys7,1--/w - ,. qS �•,, �" o YQ -Yia 1,J a5:.c vt 54tin�. ,i / � r t TL�' t �' q :�ch 4o Pc P rf 1/C ✓ = 1r T A. Q `!» � SALT;^, �' SID�wA�� 2XYzx 24 y. Z,S Gpcl/St= 60 G'PD ��JXT� I� NYE/ .1./UC. ?` enxzt4r� o wlL — — - _ fro T�'o m 3 Z4 I,o CAP I sF 7 C GND Mx 2'CA8 :x F No.jj.: I r T<!- drea r:, not ru/r�r.► — — -� / =/q -I'/2 Wdshcct 5+ont G-/t/1/,D 5U/Z ✓ E-`�O/Z S ° zone . L � c �" Gbs. .� �o�.,cAwc:+fcr• a�0 usf'i f G. i_ �, I V/ L Z1V6/1\1EFKS (� e ri/L /a0//- Igo�1om o{ F'1� -eL /R r� ��TcrZV/LLE, ��/�S'S%G�/USA TTS Oo ..M/•iN.w'.,.M7A, NMM1w1�ir.b'+}U.�/�e; 1iM1�✓ M.-,�°Y.l':- � +sfAT`sl ... - •a4�fM4rw 'N.-._1Ys.'A+'..f uv•JroLilllNJ{4M'w.MrIMrFY.1MtlM.MMM/Jo.N1r� ..