Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0100 BREEDS HILL ROAD (2) l oo 15Nreeekts N 1 --ReL - cc cp rn , TIAN.rEev+eev t PtecA% ao► ab► •' -Phase- mar 1� coy- ao tel o6ec-1 S got -Phase t • I. . 3225 MAIN STREET • P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02630 CAPE COD (508) 362-3828 • Fax (508) 362-3136 • www.capecodcommission.org COMMISSION PRELIMINARY CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE #1 —TOUR AND OFFICE FACILITY • DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2018 TO: ATTY. ELIZA COX, NUTTER MCCLENNEN AND FISH 1471 IYANNOUGH ROAD, PO BOX 1630, HYANNIS, MA 02601 PROJECT APPLICANT/ S-L SNACKS MA, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: 13515 BALLANTYNE CORPORATE PLACE, CHARLOTTE, NC 28277 PROJECT: �oCAPE COD POTATO CHIP FACTORY EXPANSION (CCC#LR17008) o PROJECT SITE/LOCATION: 'BREED'S HILL ROAD,.HYANNIS, MA z ' w o TITLE INFORMATION:. BOOK 26216 PAGE 1.75 . I co co PLAN BOOK 380 PAGE 50 (LOT 2) PLAN BOOK 388 PAGE 34 (LOT E) PLAN BOOK 406 PAGE 52 (LOT 1) N 6 v ASSESSOR'S ID: MAP 314 PARCEL 023 • This Preliminary Certificate of Compliance is hereby issued and acknowledges that the Applicant has properly complied with and satisfied the relevant terms and conditions of the above-referenced Development of Regional Impact(DRI) Scoping decision, dated July 6, 2o1.7, sufficient for issuance of this Preliminary Certificate of Compliance for the tour and office facility portion of the Project as depicted in the project plans incorporated herein. Pursuant to issuance of this Certificate,the Town of Barnstable Building Department may issue permits for construction of the tour and office facility.The Applicant shall obtain separate Certificates of Compliance for the warehouse facility portion of the Project .This Certificate acknowledges the following additional plans submitted as required by the DRI decision, which are hereby incorporated into the approved project plans,to substitute for or supplement those plans originally approved under and referenced in the DRI decision: Cape Cod.Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA Preliminary Certificate of Compliance#1.-Tour and Office Facility. - Page i of 3 Cape Cod Chips New Office and Warehouse.Expansion, prepared The Dennis Group LLC, dated 12/5/2017, consisting of i8 sheets Prior to and as a condition to issuance of a Certificate of Use/Occupancy for the tour and office facility by the Town of Barnstable Building Department,the Applicant shall first request and obtain a Final Certificate of Compliance from the Commission.To obtain this Final Certificate of Compliance,the Applicant shall prove that it has fully satisfied all relevant terms,requirements, and conditions of the DRI decision with respect to the tour and office facility portions of the Project. Upon request for this Final Certificate of Compliance, Cape Cod Commission staff will conduct an on-site inspection to confirm that the tour and office facility has been developed in compliance with the DRI decision' SEE NEXT PAGE FOR SIGNATURES • • • Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA Preliminary Certificate of Compliance'#r-Tour and Office Facility .Page 2of3 • SIGNATURES Executed this - .a of F-. ary • • Signatur i Jon. v.n Idman, Chief Regulatory Officer Pffnt Name and Title COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Barnstable, ss February 5, 2018 Before me,the undersigned notary public,personally appeared Jonathon Idman,in his/her capacity as Chief Regulatory Officer of the Cape Cod Commission,whose name is signed on the preceding document, and such person acknowledged to me that he/she signed such document voluntarily for its stated purpose. The identity of such person was proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification,which was [ ]photographic identification with signature issued by a federal or state governmental agency, [ ] oath or affirmation of a credible witness,or [x] personal knowledge of the undersigned. sii, JEFFREY MARK RIBEIRO liv) Notary Public COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS y i�fi My Commission Expires L._ October 08, 2021 Notary Pu SEAL My Commission Expires: Cape,Cod Potato Chip Factory.Expansion,Hyannis,MA Preliminary Certificate of Compliance#1—Tour and Office Facility Page3of3 Town of Barnstable OFTME To* Building Department Services do Brian Florence, CBQ w►xxsrns[.E. Building Commissioner BARNSTABLE lb., � 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 n 'B� �p t63q. �10� ieae-zoia tFo m 14 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 January 19, 2018 RIVOlg Cape Cod Chips, Inc. c/o Mr. Kyle W. Lewis The Dennis Group, LLC 1537 Main Street Springfield, MA 01103 RE: Site Plan Review#075-17 Cape Cod Chips—Phase 1 of 3 Phases of Redevelopment 100 Breeds Hi1iR da Barnstable Map 314, Parcel 314-023 Proposal: Phase 1 -Remodeling of the office and tour area of the facility including the demolition of the existing office and creation of a second floor in the same area; execution of a new walkway connecting the parking lot to the office entrance. Also, redesigning of the utilities and drainage system to fit the new layout is proposed. Tour will operate the same as before with only prepackaged product to be provided. No food service is proposed,breakroom only. Dear Mr. Lewis: The Site Plan Review Committee approved the above-referenced application at the formal site plan review meeting held January 18, 2018 subject to the following: • Approval is based upon, and must be substantially constructed in accordance with site plans entitled"Cape Cod Chips—New Office and Warehouse Expansion", 11 Sheets; elevation and floor plans entitled"Cape Cod Potato Chips, Inc. Architectural" 6 Sheets with final revision to elevation plans reflecting FAA requirements (one sheet) dated 1/15/18; photometric plan, 1 Sheet; storm water and drainage plans, 2 Sheets, all dated December 5, 2017 prepared by Dennis Group, Springfield, MA for Snyder's Lance Inc. Also reviewed: CC Potato Chip Redevelopment Traffic Memo dated March 27, 2017,prepared by VHB Watertown, MA; FAA Determination of No Hazard dated July 13, 2017; and Mass DOT Determination dated June 27, 2017. • Conditions of CCC DRI Decision, CCC File#LR17008) (attached) including but not limited to the following: o Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit the Applicant shall obtain a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance from the Commission that evidences that all conditions of the CCC DRI Decision have satisfied and that the project is in compliance with the decision. o Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Use and Occupancy by the Town for the Project as modified, the Applicant shall obtain a Final Certificate of Compliance from the Commission. • Consultation and approval from Barnstable FD regarding the fire alarm system, location of fire line, sprinkler system and location of the FDC is required prior to the building permit stage. • Elevator is required to accommodate a stretcher for ADA compliance. Consultation with Barnstable FD for dimensions of stretcher is recommended. Contact: Captain Rick Pfautz, Barnstable FD 508-362-3312. • Use of a crane during construction(if applicable) requires FAA and Mass DOT Aeronautical Studies, including a review of th.e need for lighting. Applicant must obtain all other applicable permits, licenses and approvals required. Upon completion of all work, a registered engineer or land surveyor shall submit a certified"as built" site plan and a letter of certification, made upon knowledge and belief in accordance with professional standards that all work has been done in substantial compliance with the approved site plan (Zoning Section 240-105 (G). This document shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy. Sincerely, Ellen M. Swiniarski Site Plan Review Coordinator Attachment: CCC DRI Decision#LR17008 CC: Ofian Florence,.Building Commissioner,_SPR_Chairman J' Elizabeth Jenkins, Director, Planning & Development Amanda Ruggerio, Assistant Town Engineer Captain Rick Pfautz, Barnstable FD Health Department Barnstable Municipal Airport 8bc 30695 Ps 284 44934 08--14- 201.7 a 10'= 37 n • 1/ 3225 MAIN STREET • P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02630 CAPE COD (508) 362-3828 • Fax (508) 362-3136 • www.capecodcommission.org COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT SCOPING DECISION DATE: JULY 6, 2017 TO: ATTY: ELIZA COX, NUTTER MCCLENNEN AND FISH 1471 IYANNOUGH ROAD, PO BOX 1630, HYANNIS, MA 02601 PROJECT APPLICANT/ S-L SNACKS MA, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: 13515 BALLANTYNE CORPORATE PLACE, CHARLOTTE, NC 28277 PROJECT: CAPE COD ..POTATO CHIP FACTORY EXPANSION (CCC#LR17008) PROJECT SITE/LOCATION: 60 BREED'S HILL ROAD, HYANNIS, MA TITLE INFORMATION: BOOK 26216 PAGE 175 PLAN BOOK 380 PAGE-50 (LOT 2)' PLAN BOOK 388 PAGE 34 (LOT E) PLAN BOOK 406 PAGE 52 (LOT 1) ASSESSOR'S ID: MAP 314 PARCEL 023 • SUMMARY The Cape Cod Commission(Commission).hereby determines that the Project,involving construction of a proposed 17,68o-square-foot(SF)expansion of the existing potato chip manufacturing facility located at 6o Breed's Hill Road, Hyannis,Massachusetts(Project), does -- not involve substantial deviation from the minimum performance standards of the Regional Policy Plan(RPP)and does not have significant impact upon the purposes and values identified by Section One of the Cape Cod Commission Act(Act),as conditioned herein,and that S-L Snacks MA,LLC(Applicant)may proceed with local permitting without further DRI review, subject to the conditions herein, PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant is proposing redevelopment of the existing 5.63-acre manufacturing facility site (Project Site)with the demolition of the existing 3300 SF visitor tour area acid office space, Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Pagel of'l2 reconstruction of the visitor tour area and office space with a io,93o SF addition,the relocation and expansion of the existing loading and warehouse spaces including a 10,05o SF addition,and 1 associated site improvements including improved pedestrian connections from the existing parking areas to the visitor entrance and additional/revised landscaping.(Project). PROCEDURAL HISTORY The Applicant filed a DRI Scoping application with the Commission on April 7,2o17.The Applicant submitted additional materials in April and May of 2017.The DRI Scoping application was deemed complete on June 20, 2017. At its public meeting on June 29, 2017,the Committee on Planning and Regulation(CPR) reviewed a draft DRI Scoping decision, in which the Executive Director of the Commission recommended that no further DRI review be required for the Project. The CPR recommended the draft decision,as amended,to the full Commission for its consideration and a determination that no further DRI review is required for the Project.At its meeting on July 6, 2017,the full Commission held a hearing on the Project,and voted to adopt the draft DRI Scoping decision and find that the Project does not involve substantial deviation from the minimum performance standards of the RPP, does not have significant impact upon the purposes and values identified by Section One of the Act, and that the Applicant may proceed with local permitting for the Project without further DRI review. JURISDICTION The Project qualifies as a Development of Regional Impact(DRI) pursuant to Section 3(e)of the Commission's Enabling Regulations(revised November 2(3414) as "New construction of any building or buildings ...with a Gross Floor Area greater than.1o,000 square feet." tO • In accordance with Section 5(a) of the Enabling Regulations, "(fJor any Project that is a DRL..the proponent may apply to the Commission to limit the scope of the DRI review." Pursuant to Section 5(e)(v) of the Enabling Regulations,upon submission and after review of such application, "In the event of a finding that no DRI review is required,the Executive Director shall make the recommendation to the full Cape Cod Commission which shall render a final decision whether to allow a development to proceed without further DRI review..." • FINDINGS GENERAL FINDINGS The Commission hereby finds as follows: GFi.The Applicant submitted an application to scope DRI review on April 7, 2017;the Scoping application was deemed complete on June 20, 2017. GF2. The DRI Scoping application for the Project was reviewed subject to the 2009 Regional Policy Plan,as amended in August 2012 (RPP). Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Page 2 of 12 i GF3.The Executive Director considered the Limited DRI Scoping Checklist for Redevelopment/ Change of Use(Scoping Checlist) in its review and deliberations on the DRI Scoping application. GF4.The Applicant is proposing redevelopment of the existing 5.63-acre manufacturing facility site(Project Site)with the demolition of the existing 330o SF visitor tour area and office space, reconstruction of the visitor tour area and office space with a 10,930 SF addition,the relocation and expansion of the existing loading and warehouse spaces including a 10,050 SF addition,and associated site improvements including improved pedestrian connections from the existing parking areas to the visitor entrance and additional/revised landscaping. (Project). GF5.The Project is proposed to be implemented and constructed in accordance with the following plan sets and other information and documents referenced herein: Snyder-Lance Facility Renovation,Hyannis,MA,prepared by The Stellar Group: Drawing C4000:Site Demolition Plan,dated 4/5/17 Drawing C11oo: Overall Site Plan, dated 4/5/17 Drawing C1200: Overall Utility Plan, dated 3/17/17 Drawing C13oo: Grading&Drainage Plan,dated 3/17/17 Snyder-Lance Facility Renovations and Additions,prepared by The Stellar Group: Drawing Anoo:First Floor Plan Overall, dated 4/14/17 Drawing A1200:Second Floor Plan Overall,dated 4/14/17 Drawing A1400:Roof Plan Overall,dated 4/14/17 Drawing A31o1:Exterior Elevations,dated 4/14/17 Drawing.E0001:Electrical Legend,Luminaire Schedule& General Notes,dated 5/15/17 Drawing E0003:Site Lighting Cale Plan—Electrical,dated 5/15/17 Proposed Amenities Rendering,as revised by image included in submittal from applicant dated 5/16/17 Cape Cod Chips,prepared by Clipper Landscape LLC,dated 5/8/17,consisting of 1 sheet Proposed Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Redevelopment,Memorandum,prepared by VHB,dated 3/27/17 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SPPP),prepared by Snyder's-Lance Incorporated, dated May 2016 Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Page 3 of 12 RPP FINDINGS LAND USE LUF1.The Project Site is located within a mapped Industrial Service and Trade Area on the Commission-approved Land Use Vision Map(LUVM)for the Town of Barnstable,thus the Project meets Minimum Performance Standard(MPS)LU1.1(Development Location). LUF2.The Project involves multi-story development and is proposed within currently disturbed and impervious areas on previously developed site.Thus,the Project does not involve substantial deviation from MPS LU1.2(Compact Development). LUF3.As the Project does not propose any capital facilities or infrastructure and is not on or adjacent to agricultural lands,the standards under Goals LU2(Capital Facilities and Infrastructure)and LU3 (Rural Lands)do not apply. LUF4.The Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Land Use Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder, and thus does not require substantive DRI review for the RPP issue area of Land Use,which is hereby scoped out of DRI review. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EDF1.The Project Site is located within a mapped Industrial Service and Trade Area,thus the Project meets MPS ED1.1 (Location in Economic Centers). EDF2.The Project is not located on agricultural,waterfront or recreational lands.Therefore, MPS ED1.4(Resource-based Economic Areas)does not apply. EDF3.The Project does not involve gaming.Therefore,MPS ED2.1(Gaming)does not apply. EDF4.As the Project does not propose any capital facilities or infrastructure,the standards under Goal ED4(Infrastructure Capacity)do not apply to the Project. EDF5.The Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Economic Development Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder, and thus does not require substantive DRI review for the RPP issue area of Economic Development, which is hereby scoped out of DRI review. WATER RESOURCES WRF1.Although the Project Site is located within Commission-mapped Water Resources protection areas,the Project is connected to public sewer,is expected to result in de minimus changes to site-wide nitrogen loading,and does not propose an increase in the storage of hazardous wastes or materials.Additionally,the Project is registered with MassDEP as a Very Small Quantities Generator of hazardous wastes, and the Applicant has supplied a Storrnwater Pollution Prevention Plan.Thus,the Project is consistent with the MPS under Water Resources Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Page 4 of 12 Goals WRi(General Aquifer Protection),WR2(Drinking Water Quality and Quantity),WR3 (Marine Water Embayments and Estuaries),WR4(Freshwater Ponds and Lakes),and WR5 (Water Quality Improvement Areas). WRF2.Water Resources Goal WR6 (Public and Private Wastewater Treatment Facilities)does not apply to the Project as the site's wastewater treatment facility serves to pre-treat wastewater prior to conveyance to the public sewer,and the MPS under Goal WR6 only apply to private facilities that will convey effluent to in-ground leaching structures. WRF3.While the Project does not involve significant changes to stormwater patterns and treatment or impervious coverage on the Project Site,the proposed upgrades will result in an overall improvement of stormwater treatment.Thus,the Project is consistent with the MPS under Water Resources Goal WRY(Stormwater Quality). WRF4.The Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Water Resources Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder.The Project does not require substantive DRI review under the issue area of Water Resources, and this issue area is hereby scoped out of DRI review. NATURAL RESOURCES NRF1.The Project Site is mapped as Significant Natural Resource Area due to the presence of the Wellhead Protection Area,but the Project is not anticipated to negatively affect the resources protected by this mapping.Additionally,the Project Site does not contain and is not proximate to wetlands or wetland buffer zones,and is not located on the coast or offshore. The Project does not propose to disturb or alter more than two acres of previously undisturbed land,and is located primarily on previously developed areas of the site;thus the Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Open Space and Recreation,Coastal Resources, Marine Resources,Wetlands,and Wildlife and Plant Habitat Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder,and the Project does not require substantive DRI review under these RPP issue or sub-issue areas,which are hereby scoped out of DRI review. TRANSPORTATION TRF1.A transportation memorandum("Transportation Memo"),submitted as part of the application materials,prepared by VHB,dated March 27, 2017,provides transportation information in support of the application. TRF2. Commission Transportation staff met with members of the Applicant's development team and the transportation engineer in February and March of 2o17,respectively,to discuss the nature of the project and potential impacts on the transportation system. TRF3.The characterization the of project in the Transportation Memo as"an upgrade to the existing manufacturing facility to modernize and improve efficiency"and `Metter accommodate the tours which are already an active part of operations"appropriately characterizes the Project regarding the RPP issue area of Transportation. Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Page 5 of 12 TRF4.The trip generation estimates are based on trip generation data in Institute of Transportation Engineers'(ITE)Trip Generation, 9th Edition,for Land Use Code(LUC)14o, Manufacturing,which is an accurate characterization of the site,and the calculations were performed in accordance with Technical Bulletin 96-003.The estimated increase in traffic from the Project during different time periods is as presented in Table 1. Table 1: Estimated Project Trip Generation Trip Generation(trips) Time Period Existing Site Proposed Site Net New Trips Traffics Traffic2 Weekday Daily Trips 13o 198 +68 Weekday AM Peak Hour 24 37 +13 Weekday PM Peak Hour 25 38 +13 Based on ITE LUC i4o,Manufacturing,34,10o square feet 2 Based on ITS LUC 1.4o,Manufacturing,51,790 square feet TRF5.As presented in the Transportation Memo,VHB conducted a sight distance evaluation of the site driveways and found that sufficient stopping sight distance is provided.The Transportation Memo presents a motor vehicle crash analysis for the most recent five-year period available(2010-2014)for the site driveways and the intersection of Independence Drive at Breed's Hill Road. During this analysis period,no crashes were reported at the site driveway with one property damage crash reported at the of Independence Drive at Breed's Hill Road. TRF6.The Transportation Memo presents a capacity analysis of the site driveways and the intersection of Independence Drive at Breed's Hill Road under 2017 Existing Conditions,2024 No-Build Conditions,and 2024 Build Conditions.This analysis indicates that the Project will have a negligible impact on the operations of these intersections. TRF7.No changes to site access along Breed's I-Iill Road are proposed as part of the Project.The internal site circulation will be improved by relocating the loading and adding a dedicated pedestrian walkway between the parking lot and the facility.These site improvements will eliminate a conflict that currently exists between truck and pedestrian,improving safety. TRF8. The Scoping Checklist for limited Development of Regional Impact(DRI)contains the following transportation related questions: Cape Cod.Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Page 6 of 12 Table 2: Transportation Scoping Questions Will the project generate No,the project will not generate more than 25o more than 25o new daily new daily trips. trips? Will the project generate No,the project will not generate more than 25 more than 25 new peak hour new peak hour trips through a high crash trips at a high crash location. location? Yes,the project site abuts Independence Drive(a Does the project have direct regional road),but site access is provided from access on or does the project Breed's Hill Road(a local road).No significant abut a regional roadway? transportation impact is anticipated on the regional roadway. TRF9. Based on the preceding findings,the Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Transportation Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder.The Project does not require substantive DRI review under the RPP issue area of Transportation,and this issue area is hereby scoped out of DRI review. WASTE MANAGEMENT WMF1.The Project is located within a Wellhead Protection Area,but does not propose an increase in the amounts of hazardous materials or wastes stored or produced at the Project Site. Additionally,the Project is registered with MassDEP as a Very Small Quantities Generator of hazardous wastes.Further,the Project will not create significant amounts of solid waste during the construction phase aside from wastes produced by the dismantling of the existing visitor tour area and office space on site,and thus does not require the preparation of a construction and demolition waste plan. WMF2.The Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Waste Management Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder.The Project does not require substantive DRI review under the RPP issue area of Waste Management,and this issue area is hereby scoped out of DRI review. ENERGY EF1.The Project proposes to comply with Goal El (Emissions and Energy Use)through a commitment to a variety of sustainability initiatives outlined in the application materials. Recognizing the Project entails an addition to a 1980's-era manufacturing facility,it would likely be prohibitively difficult for the Project to meet the requirements under Goal Ei by retrofitting Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Page 7 of 12 i I the existing portions of the facility,and the sustainability initiatives outlined adequately address the intent of Goal El. EF2.The Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Energy Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder.The Project does not require substantive DRI review under the RPP issue area of Energy, and this issue area is hereby scoped out of DRI review. AFFORDABLE HOUSING AHF1.The Project is located within an Industrial Service and Trade Areas as mapped on the LUVM for the Town of Barnstable,which is equivalent to being mapped as an Economic Center for the purposes of the RPP issue area of Affordable Housing. AHF2. In accordance with MPS AH3.1(Mitigation Standard),the Project's community contribution is calculated under the use of"Other"in accordance with Technical Bulletin 10- o01. AFH3. Cape Cod Potato Chips falls under the NAICS code"Other Food Manufacturing"as used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment Statistics(OES).Roughly 89%of jobs within the sector nationally pay below average wages per the OES.The OES average wage ($23.86/hour nationally and$23.66/hour for Barnstable County)is similar to income limits for affordable housing for those making 8o%of Area Median Income($22.88/hour for Barnstable County). AFH4.MPS AH3.1 currently requires a payment of$18,740.80 for the use of"Other"for the Project. AFH5.The Applicant has agreed to make a payment in the amount of$18,740.8o to be used toward the development of Affordable Housing in the Town of Barnstable,and thus, as so conditioned herein,the Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Affordable Housing Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder. The Project does not require substantive DRI review under the issue area of Affordable Housing, and this issue area is hereby scoped out of DRI review. HERITAGE PRESERVATION/ COMMUNITY CHARACTER HPCCFI.The Applicant submitted a Project Notification Form(PNF)to the Massachusetts Historical Commission(MIHC), and MI-IC certified in writing on March 29,2017 that the Project is unlikely to impact historic or archaeological resources,meeting MPS IIPCC1.3 (Archaeological Sites).The Project complies with HPCC1.1(Historic Structures)and HPCC1.2(Cultural Landscapes)because the Project will not impact any historic structures or cultural landscapes. HPCCF2.The Project involves renovation and expansion of an existing manufacturing facility within an Industrial Service and Trade Area.The structure is currently somewhat shielded from Independence Drive by an existing pine woods buffer.The Project will reduce the width of this Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Page 8of12 vegetated buffer near the northwest corner of the building,but additional plantings will provide a similar level of screening. HPCCF3.Given the Project's screening and its location within a mapped Industrial Service and Trade Area,the RPP allows flexibility in the building design and materials used under MPS HPCC2.7(Non-traditional Materials and Designs).While the structure is primarily a metal building,the Project proposes elements that reference traditional materials and forms on the new primary façade which includes the employee and public tour entrance.The entrances are designed to resemble a lighthouse and small gable-roofed buildings,reflecting the company's logo.Proposed exterior materials are primarily cementitious clapboards on the lower half of the façade and cementitious shingles on the upper half,consistent with RPP standards. Large windows are evenly spaced across the façade,and most will be functioning. Overall,the proposed additions provide almost 6o feet of façade variation along the new 284-foot long façade,consistent with RPP standard HPCC2.6(Building Forms and Facades). HPCCF4.The Project is located within an Industrial Service and Trade Area and seeks to expand the building area within primarily previously disturbed area.The expansion of the building will bring part of the structure closer to Independence Drive and disturb some of the existing buffer, but the area will be replanted with evergreens,which will provide sufficient additional buffering of the building to Independence Drive and meet MPS HPCC2.9(Landscape Improvements for Redevelopment).The Project does not involve alterations to the existing parking areas. HPCCF5. Proposed exterior lighting and signage are consistent with MPS HPCC2.11(Exterior Lighting)and MPS HPCC2.12(Signage). HPCCF6.The Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Heritage Preservation/Community Character Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder.The Project does not require substantive DRI review under the issue area of Heritage Preservation/Community Character, and this issue area is hereby scoped out of DRI review. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing findings,the Commission hereby further finds and determines that the Project as described in this decision does not involve substantial deviation from the minimum performance standards of the RPP,does not have significant impact upon the purposes and values identified by Section One of the Act,does not require further DRI review and that the Applicant may proceed with local permitting for the Project without further DRI review,subject to the conditions below. CONDITIONS Cr.The Applicant may undertake and obtain local permitting for the Project without further`/ DRI review,pursuant to and consistent with this terms and conditions of this decision,within a period of seven years from the date of this decision,which time maybe extended by the Commission,upon good cause shown by the Applicant. Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA • DRI Scoping Decision Page 9 of 12 C2. This decision shall be appurtenant to and run with the property which is the subject Project Site.The decision shall bind and be enforceable against, and inure to the benefit of,the Applicant,its heirs,successors, and assigns. C3. Failure to comply,and remain in compliance,with all findings and conditions stated herein shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this decision. C4.The Applicant shall obtain all necessary federal, state, and local permits for the Project. C5. This decision shall not be valid and effective until a copy of the same has been recorded with the Barnstable.Registry of Deeds.The Commission shall record a copy of this decision with the Barnstable Registry of Deeds,with recording costs borne by the Applicant,after the decision's appeal period pursuant to Section 1.7 of the Cape Cod Commission Act has elapsed, or if such an appeal has been filed,after the appeal has been fmally dismissed,settled or is adjudicated or otherwise disposed of in favor of the Applicant. No local development permit that might be issued for the proposed development approved herein shall be valid or effective until the Commission has so recorded a copy of this decision. C6.The Project shall be undertaken,constructed and maintained in accordance with the Findings and Conditions set out herein,including the plan sets and other information and documents referenced herein under Finding GF5.Changes to the approved Project and to the approved project plans shall require modification to this decision, in accordance with the Modification section of the Commission's Enabling Regulations then in effect when such modification is sought.All plans and documents required to be submitted as conditions of this decision shall hereby be incorporated into this decision as and when received, reviewed, and approved by the Commission. a'rior to and as a condition to issuance of a Building Permit or undertaking any development as approved herein,including but not limited to site work and installation of foundations or footings,the Applicant shall obtain a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance from the Commission that evidences that all conditions in this decision required to have been satisfied prior to the issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance have been satisfied,and that the Project is in compliance with this decision. rior and as a condition to issuance of any Preliminary Certificate of Compliance by the Commission for development as approved herein,the Applicant shall submit copies of final project plans as approved,and permits,licenses and approvals issued,by state,federal,and local authorities(except for a Building Permit)for review by Commission staff who shall determine their consistency with this decision.If Commission staff determines that the final plans are not consistent with those project plans approved, referenced and incorporated herein, the Applicant shall be required to seek a modification to this decision for further review and approval of the project plan changes by the Commission in accordance with the"Modification" section of the Commission's Enabling Regulations in effect at the time the modification is sought. Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Page io of 12 C9. Prior to and as a condition to issuance of a Pre Certificate Compliance,the pplicant shall provide written proof to the Commissionliminary that a copy ofof this decision has been received by the Project general contractor.This decision and a copy of approved plans for the project shall be maintained on the Project Site throughout project construction. Cio. Prior to and as a condition to issuance of a Certificate of Use/Occupancy for the Project by the Town,the Applicant shall obtain a Final Certificate of Compliance from the Commission that evidences that all conditions in this decision required to have been satisfied prior to issuance of a Final Certificate of Compliance have been satisfied and that the Project is in compliance with this decision. Cu.. Commission staff will undertake a review of the Project's compliance with this decision, including the applicable conditions hereof,upon the Applicant's request to the Commission for issuance of a Preliminary or Final Certificate of Compliance.At the time the Applicant requests such a certificate,it shall provide Commission staff a list of key project contact(s),along with their telephone numbers,mailing addresses,and email addresses, in the event questions arise during the Commission's compliance review.As part of its compliance review,Commission staff may make, and the Applicant hereby authorizes,a site inspection, as needed, at reasonable times and upon reasonable notice to the Applicant. Upon review,the Commission shall either prepare and issue the requested Certificate, or inform the Applicant in writing of any compliance deficiencies and the remedial action required for the issuance of the requested Certificate. C12. Prior to and as a condition to issuance of a Final Certificate of Compliance,the Project shall pay to the Barnstable County Treasurer in care of the Commission an affordable housing mitigation payment of$18,74o.80,which payment shall be held for and made available to the Town of Barnstable to support projects or strategies that increase the availability of affordable housing in the Town. 1 SEE NEXT PAGE FOR SIGNATURES Cape Cod Potato Chip Factoiy Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Page 11 of 12 r SIGNATURES Executed this 6 4/ day of ...JC.//, 2017. 1 / A' 'e' , , ignature • ; otikf N. /�e �i_/ /`c7e-je r' I V e6 `IN Print Name and Title J COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Barnstable,ss ,Jay ,2017 Before me,the undersigned notary public,personally appearedJthii /! ,///c• G-/<</1G<K,' in his/her capacity as 1 Y' C��1u!!�!1'I/l/7 of the Cape Cod Commission, whose name is signed on the preceding document,and such person acknowledged to me that he/she signed such document voluntarily for its stated purpose. The identity of such person was proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification,which was [ J photographic identification with signature issued by 4.federal or state governmental agency, { J oath or affirmation of a credible witness,or[1Tpersonal knowledge of the undersigned. k A GAIL P.HANLEY ( 9 i , � max-//tary Public .� ems, / sky e l G; COMAtPN NoWEAITN OF MA68ACNtldETT8 I My Commission EXPOS Notary Public September 28.2018 I amosiessiververissyscrousisorft SEAL My Commission Expires: ? 4 8 -/F Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision Page 12 of 12 BARNSTABLE REGISTRY OF DEEDS John F. Meade, Register 1 410 HEThe Town of Barnstable 71. Department of Public Works (41.\--;:ea.k. • 382 Falmouth Road,Hyannis,MA 02601 BARNSTABLE` BARNSTABLE. 7, MASS. 4gt www.town.barnstable.ma.us 1634d_ Daniel W. Santos, P.E. Office: 508.790.6400 Director Fax : 508.790.6343 I January 18,2018 S-L Snack Ma LLC 13024 Ballantyne Corp Place 1 `'1Charlotte,NC 28277 -n ``` M o -n SUBJECT: Numbering of Buildings �, co Parcel No. 314/023 y c -Dear Property Owner, 0 r- tz• rn Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Code of the Town of Barnstable, Chapter 51,Numbering of Buildings, adopted August 18, 1994. Public convenience and necessity require the assignment of number 100 to your property located on Breed's Hill Road, • Barnstable. This number should be affixed to your building so that it is visible from the street as outlined in Exhibit "E", Town of Barnstable Rules and Regulations for Numbering of Buildings. Barnstable Fire Department has agreed with this change of address to comply with the Town of Barnstable Rules and Regulations. The previous address for Parcel No. 314/023 was 60 Breed's Hill Road,Barnstable. Sincerely, Pd44w4 Paul Graves,P.E. Town Engineer I Encl: NI Town of Barnstable Rules and Regulations ❑ Common Address Questions ❑ Site map Assessors Change Form • EXHIBIT ]" Multiple Buildinee and(oe Uni;Ass only one aseigned Street number will be issued per lot or parcel. •Mu1tiple buildings or units will be unitized,, 'the• Ung .neerang Division wilt not be responsible for recording unit numbers. Should previouely aaaigned numbers , to existing buildings prove oonfeeing for t nergeney response departments; the unit nunbers may be ohaeged to eliminate confusion, •otherwise :this section applies only, to • new structures. • . • umbers • The objeottve'of this section is to insure the posting of numbers adequate in size and color so as to be visible •from the road on which the number was issued. The size .of the numbers shall, be not less than three inches nor mare than twelve inches in height. Color: The color of the ntunbera shall be of high contrast with. the background material. Black on white is optimum, brass numbers on neutral colored bacskcround or unfinished siding ie not acceptable.. Shapes The shape of the numbers shall be Arabic. Roman Numerals, script or written shal.:l, not be used. Location h cmbere shall he visible from both directions from the main road that the numbers were iastied. Numbers shall be posted ' • an the building at eye level, preferably at the' main entrance. Buildings .which are not visible from the road, or not located within 100 feet of the road shell have the numbers affixed on the building so that they are visible from the driveway and Wt the road entrance of the driveway. ,A mail box, post, wooden eign or other • approved device at the road entrance of the driveway visible from the.Main road may.be considered suitable. .s: .gument of Bnforcement: Notice of inoorreot or nonposting of numbers may forwarded to the Police Department for issuance of noncriminal citation as outlined in Section 6, Article V. If, . after 30 days of notifiasation .of violation, the property owner hats failed to affix visible street numbers as assigned by the • ¶'own Begineer, a no .urimirial citation shall be issued. • I 4 ' May 3, 1994 • EXHIBIT L • TOWN or EMQB'1'AIlT1I'Y ROLLS. AND REGULATXONO = MERINO OF BUIIIDIXOS . f REF: GENERAL{ ORDINANCES ARTICLE V Avol,ar)nlep t (Reet Section I article V). The Aegignment of building numbers will be under the direction of: Town} BnAnegr. Method of, Number Bet bli,tshtitent t (Her* Section Article V). The town will utilize a system of numbers issued by roadway stationing. Whereas, a number may be .assigned every 10' along the oenterline at the roadway. The beginning of stationing will start at (A) the main road in which the new roadoriginates, (H.) the entrance of the road closest to the Nearest District .tine Department or ( the col -de-sao closest to the main road (in the event of a double ended road) "WEN" numbers will be issued to lots prim ri.ly on the north ox east side of the roadway. "ODD" numbers will be issued to lots primarily on the smith j2x west aide of the roadway• Corner 1,otsa Building numbers are assigned to all roads that the. property abuts. However, access is critical to property location therefore, field inspection may be required to verify proper number. unneme4 limn: 'Unnamed roads, easements, rights of ways will be addressed from the main road. in 'high' the way takes access. "Ways off of" will not be recognized .for individual addressing. lioter Unofficial road names will .not be recognized for assigning building numbers. plural Acaesst Numbers will be assigned to all. roads .abutting a lot or parcel. The town will. riot be responsible to prove legal. • access for number assignments for abutting roads. Uowev'er numbers will, not be assigned for lots that do not abut the. road in question unless an alternate legal access can be proven by the property owner. Driveways in common will only be recognized i::dr numbering with proof of legal access over other lots. Lots that abut roads outside of town boundary lines- must obtain building numbers , from that particular town to avoid differences in numbering of those roads. , • III' • ,�D�+iYD LlYl �Ldl 1 • • P:Town Of Bhmatable Rules.and It egutatlous fot Nwxa'b hag of Buildings,amoral' Ordinances Article V, • Corner Lots:Building numbers are assigned to inroads That the properl'abuts: , • k owever,access is oritioal to property location,Therefore,field inspection may be required to+terif:y proper number, ; Discussion: Corner lots pose problems fox fssuaxtce because of difftuent options for identifying a building location by appearance,Since,piaoernent of the building,landscape contours,driveway access and fonoea,foliage or other obstruction..causes a building of this type to be'viewed differently,the following will be used for proper determination of corteet assignment of building numbers,: 1)Primary attempt for.assigxwaextt will be for what is.determined as the;front door entrance of the builciig. 2)Buildings that canna be aceessedfiron the road that the front faces(because of property elevations,fences,foliage or other obstructions)will be assigned anwnber from the road fox its primary driveway access 3)Buildings that are placed cater-cornered on the lot may utilize the driveway entrance as the determining factor for which road will be used for assignment of building numbers, (NOT..B:refer to items 1&2 fox borderline determinations.)Only eater-cornered placed- buildings with circular driveways will have the option of utmzbea/road assignment. 4) Conditions that may change the"tippearanoe of.location.'may require re-assigxument of number/road combinations. ' • -Conclusion:Addressing is Of vital.importen oe Pox proper field identification of a building,eepeoial ly in.tbe case of emargeney�Standardized technique's are- uzred.to • understand soma of the connplocplaeerztenta and alternate:Recessesprovldedto1uildiuga, Utilizing those methods should robot:the oonfusion of locating these buildings In the e1d • • • C:i barn.B-911,doc. • 1- ParcelEdit Page 1 of 1 .,,,o/c?..--1-ii:-!, ..i;..:41,..., ,,,,,,, tiiiiii.x..i.,',:::..ew..,.. . . • 0 — 1, ....: •;.: .. .. .....:,Av....4. . .: - ,f4,7 ,4,,,s,b -c;',,....1p,47....„,,,...a.,',17-..-zo,44f.:-0,::....:.-.:: :.- • : ivy". .. ............ —.; ....„,,agfp,:y...ot.A....4%.• . ; .,.i ..., 4...:,.. .' 1.'"411:47.:-,;•:1,4"11,1gu••::.•'. :.• ''...!:,•!,,..: e:2-2,4170.• (..".r•• ....••-5•,,,,'4:;:.;:74,.......,,i...;...:;u9;,1,q-.;,,,,,:;, ..,,k.,:,.-,,,r00. .. ,.,,, 1 umliorAul.r,. :ii VA.i.4.:11.441,145gii•!:,;•!..:,;:':16-% -v.:.".:'''",l!A!4:Ofbittv.it.5, -.14 •7.7.11 ,-','..:':,,:.:.:,•-•-•'::.•• •::, ----. , y\ N l'.'S5. !I yg:Pij.ikl'-.0'''.-FILdega;f;.t'i::..•:',J:':*-: 'g„ ,,,,,,, i,,o: ...4v,,,i,,o,r..R.,:,r..--tr.:.t.,.t.,,,,:,.:...:.•:.....-., . • „......:....„,„„,.,,,„.„,,,..„,..„:„,„...„.„L„,,,,,,, .. ..„§„,„,..,.......„,„,„.......„ •• ... ... : 43c- . ' ' • -:. . .. ... - '77-10Wratif,'.jrtili .-i, Logged In As: Thursday,January 18 2018 Pa rce I Application Center Road System Reports Road System The record has been updated. Parcel Detail Parcel ID l*f:402:$,:::: .:NIS. Sewer Acct: Ig40(5,..ffiggilliai -r/R D kUPOitii Devel Lot: Owner: $41.:aN44:M6110:!.. .011.;';.M.:;:;fla1'.::,•; l0i.:iiMg. ::::Kg0.*;.:$1 Co Owner: [i...: ,::J»i.T.:,q!.-.i :;: ,,l','.. .::1,:::q.1:1•*:gli.1._!1.!, 1. .',§: ,:'*!i:-- .i.;:::;:."...i.44i-.IEll-:0'.-g*:,:'g'hi ..:;:gi Street: Itigg#INAANVORAMOgRK'itiMnialf-Agil City: 10.003(0.17#100Miga state: FrA zip: igggS.E.V.11 ,F Location: r--- .... , 1 orr.,...] IBRED,Qtily_R2ApE,„,..,... vVillage: Barnstable { al ....-----...........„„,_ Road Index: 11950 : I Prl Frontage: 1429 I .................„_.__ To set road,you can also enter road index and tab out of field. Secondary Road: 'INDEPENDENCE DRIVE d'A . ...._ .. ......_.. . . f Sec Index: J0758 _ Sec Frontage: 1394 ...I Visions Location: 1.66::0'.RigOOHJAVPOISM:Vdni. Last Updated: lyiltyligg7104.0::40.01* ...,.. No. Bldgs: P::.':::;li ...;: :1:::_i%:*.:::1 Account No; riggttg:',',: ;V.i.Ul Lot Size(acres); litomgool State Class: 1400O :!::P;4:i Year Added 11:00V.i. .,-,-.5:i.',,01 Fire Dist: RAN........................ ... 1 Deed Date: 141/0.020::;i! Deed Ref: I2621Olj75 :1 Land Value: 149..0:19.01kU0- Bldgs Value: 11§47.0:0;00 Extra Features: 1,110Z.Q,Okal Condo Complex: ZY::7,:T:Viqp:;.Di.MV.MiN Bullding:KEVNI Unit:L.1-:•:":•,;,:•',',"-.7,1•:::•,i':-.,qt;• .•:!- : i:;,.•3!a."..:C,.•:1 --,! 1 .:±tiPcOP•,: • • http://issql2/intranet/propdata/ParcelEdit.aspx?ID-26587 1/18/2018 1 3225 MAIN STREET • PQ; BOX;22b . : BA'RNSTABLE MASSACHUSETTS.02630 • CA E CO D (SQ8) $62 3828 • Fax(508)3b2-3136'+ www.capecodcommission org,' COMM I SS I O N. TO'. Town of Barnstable Town Clerk,Building Inspector,Town Planner,Planning; Board,Conservation Commission,Board of Health,Board of Appeals,and DRI Liaison; FROM: Gail Hanley,Clerk of the Commission.: SUBJECT: Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion Development of:Regional Impact Scoping Decision BRx7oo8 DATE:, July ii,2017 Eosed:please fin d a copy ofthe Development of Regional Impact Scopmg;Decisionfor the: Cape Cod.Potato`Chip Factory-Expan"sion project T.:fiat was;approved by the.Cape Cod -1'2 Commission on July 6,;2o17. Should:you,have any que p stions;. lease do;not Hesitate to contact our once:.; i . M J) Y a7 .: f . „. . ,. , . • . .. . , „ . • .. .. . , .. , . .... - • - „.. ..i,.. : .. : . . . ,".---., . • '.,•-' - • . . ..... . . ..... .: .... :.„, . .: „: :.: : :.„..,.. ::„, .., • ., . •(1 • ”-,:'... , .., . . . . . .. ... .. ,-.... . ... . . .. ...... .. .. . . . .. .. . .. ... ... . . . .. ...... ..... . . .... . ... ... . ... ,• .. ., .. ... .,„...... ... . ...,„..... ....... ... . .... ... .. .• ....... . . .. .. .... . $225i.MAItit STREET •: :•'RQ,:t30)C.226'.. ••.--- ... . - .. ' '- '' '..--- '' ' ' ' .,....„:„ .„. ,;... tiAOHN. $..:.I:....A.:i3.....4.18..iMA... .S.'..A.:.'.0.,.H..,.....V.: 5.....E...t.,..T.$:.'•:4243...):1 '\..-:,---2.: ."' ''•••• •- . • - ,, . .: . . .. .. ... .. . . . .. . .. .:,. . ... , . . ... . .... ... ... • : • :- , •„••:•::i. . ' • •• -••••••:::::•:• 1:'.1'.:•i :"..:::....... .•::•:.:7:I:.,,,: I•' •: •.: ..,......'.." {CAPE COD: . .. . .. . . . . .. .. . . . .•,...... .... , .,...: •, . . . .. 1 ... 1508)1 , , .. 5 , 6 i...-.1 .... , ,:..,:. . .. : ' .62'382a-*::Fax'( 08Y3' 24: 36' ••'''ticri.Evik tie66de66iniiision'Org: ' : :. • — - ,ca . . :. . , COMNISSIO:N: ....• ... .,, . .... : •• :. . . . , ... ... .. .. , . . .... ..„.. DEVELOPMENT REGIONAL SCOPINGDECISION . ..... . . ... . . ...:. . . . ,.. .......„.. . , • •• •••••. .- .- :1DATE:. . JULY 6 20.17* ':- • •.' •': :'.' - - -•' :. ••• - ' • - ' .. , . .. . . ... .:. . . .........: ..:. .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . . ...,........ ... TO: •i•-• ..„. : ATTY.:"EtracCOX NUTTER.'MCCLENNEN-AND'FISH.• - - • •••.' • ,.•' '. : , ''. ' •''::. "1411:IYANS00.04:,,A4Afx:FOOOX1630, tlYArsli4.5;.;...tW02e.'0I:: . . : : ....:: : :::. :: .. :: ...:•::•,- - ::: - - - :„,. : - ::.i „..:. .::.::: . . , PROJECT...A00i1C.ANti': '-'' ''.::'''SL.-,SN'AO<5:1-ilk::,t1,:d,,,,.- - '.• ••• .,-. . . . • • . . . .. .......... ... ...... . • • 1 , .• - . '., PROPE R-T„,..Y•:..:,OWNER: .. .,., 1‘.351:5BAILA..N..TYNE. •CORPORATE PLACE,. . .„„:CHARLOT: Ef NC 28.27 .. .:.- • . . ... . PROJECT:.- • - '. :::::, -(A;*.., QP:POTATO CHIP FACTORY EXPANSION .., .. . .. . . „ .......,... ,.. .... ._._,. ..• ....„. . .. ... :. • . . ' ••••:••• • I°D • HILL - PROJECTSIM/LOCATION.:.4r•LBREEIYS ROAD,-,HYANNIS,'MA: . , , .. ..„,„ ,. .,. ... ..,..... „..,... .....: ... . ...,..„,... ... ... .... . 1 ' .• • 1 tttit .10POMATtoNii :.i. 1100K.;i6Z) " :::..... ' 175 . ''''' ..::.. ... .:.. .:.. ' .. • . PLAN BOOK 380 PAGE 50 (LOT 2) • — • "—• ' • .• - • •- ' '..K.A4....000.K3$0!• : . -PAqE"14;::.0407..17,0.:.- • .,.„. „:••.........,,... .,...„.,. PLAN BOOK 406..„E-,'„,: PAq.E.:'SZ...:(.4c)17.1.)::.. ,....... ,.. .. „.. . „.... . .. .. . .. ... , . •.„ . .• . . :• : • , " .. • •• - . . .. .: : • ... • ...•, • ..,• . • . ASSESSOR'S ID: MAP$1,::'4, ' PARCEL 023 • SUMMARY • •:•'' — '. ' ••• . ' •'•" ' '''• ''' ''•:•'• .. - ''''' ''. - '.• " ' ' <•'-' .•:. • . , : ••• - ... .0p:04o::04.c.o..0):-.;tooio.,(011:04;5 .).40J), t. ..by....doorrioe.'0,tbo.:tho.,..pioiot,i0:0v44, toiis•..tt.•40tiot.:„.;of••:A••••....pr..O-O•,..$•0a.•:l•„z6•:•:3„4:•.,4...p,i te•::,faot.._(S•••,P): expansion.•,cfthee*is.t4&pot:•k... qe4i.p manufacturing facility located at 6o Breed's kirog0,„k .440i8,:M4444ehus #4,(Ttoje4):, ,4oes.',.. .. 0004VOlii0401*40441.4091..4#04ft0*****41014:':v4forop44o,*4*4.4..0.4.0,#10„gee034 voliey,plek(00)::,44c14004:#0.!.40yoeigtge,Ahtlppeetiv.ppA'xhp:opos.e. qTI4,7Fpleesidentifie-4: bY,',S0Oicin.0A0:ofOtotapeCodgogo,4004AetfAeil as toldi,#64q4lioretni:Ancilliat S.,,,L, . 1 •:• ••:$444;.V4•1441,-tAt.ii.,044,6*iiiit$004*iilfioc.4-noroitttigii.010ikf441ier1)Z,'reirlei.ey;:. blibiedttoAhettezditiotoheteiit ' ... .. ,.:. PROJECTI'D.ESCIOITON . .r.„„. • . • • :...' ' .-, .. . • • The proposing • . (Poje.. $• i:te),!*j.*ithe.4ehi.01.00*cit!the e*ting,. goo SF.vigitoitoiit'aie : iiatiffiA:00, „ • '' • ... .: :.• , .:•'04.0'004.:..T,Oti40"•;,ohhJ.40.i00:tiipinsi:04i4rititiii?li.)14, . ... ...„ .. . :!to.4s4or*g.Deciokii.t::i,.]: .i ..:......, . ::.p,ogo.:of..*: •.. .. •- .. , ., ., .. ..,. , .e. •. . ...... , .. ..., ..• . : .•••• ;', f„.., . . . • !,;•; „ • .. . , • ,OF3,The,Executive pireptor•tonsiclered,the Limited DR coping Checklist for Iteclevel;prneutt Change of T.Iaef(Scoping Checklist)in its review and deliberations on the DEI Scoping APPI.leati012, GF4.TheApplicantlaproposing redevelopment of the existing 5.63-acreManufacturing facility site(Project Site)with the demolition of the existing.33 oo SF visitor tour area and office space, reconstruction of the visitor tour area and office space with a 16,930 SF addition,the relocation and expansion of the existing 1pading And warehouse spaces including alOk050 SF addition,and associated site improvements including improved pedestrian connections fronitheexisting parkingareas:id the visitor entrance and additional/revised landScaping. (Project). • • GF5.`The'projectIS proposed to be implemented And constructed in accordance with the following plan sets and other information and documents referenced herein Snyder-LanceFaciiitRencivarion,Hyannis,MA,prepared by The,Stellar Group Drawing C4000:Site Demolition Plan,dated 4/5/17 „.„ Drawing D 'Ciicial:Overall Site Plan,deted,4/5/11 DrawiniC1200::Querall,titility Plan,dated 3 j17/1.7 Drawing C300:‘GraCiing&Drainage Plan,dated3/17/17 Snyder-Lance Facility Renovations and Additic'ms,prepared by The Stellar Group: Drawing A,floo:First Floor Plan Ovqtall,dated4/14/17. Drawing Floor Plan Overall,dated 4/14/17 Drawing 4,1400:RoofPlan Overall,dated 4/14/17 Drawing.A.3101:Exterior Elevations,dated 4/14/17' DraWing.t000itElectricallegencl,Luminaire,Schedzite. . 'General Notes,dated 5/15/17 Drai4bigEo0o3:-SiteLightiitg ca/c Plan,—Electrical,dated 5/15/17 ProposedAmenitiesRenderinq,as revised by image included in submittal from applicant dated 5/16/17 Cape Cod prepared by Clipper Landscape'IC,dated 5/8/17,consisting of 1 Sheet, Proposed Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Redevelopment,biremoranAuff4PrePared;bY VHB;dated 3/27/17 • Storm Water Pollution PreventionPlan(SPPP);Preparedby Snyder's-Lance Intorpotated;.dated May goi.6 Cage Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,MA DIU Scoping Decision Pkiel Of 12 • . • • • RPP FINDNOS LAND USE , . ,LLIFf,The Project Site is located within a mapped Industrial Service and Trade Area on the Commission-approved Land WeVisinn:Map(LUVM)for the Town Of Barnstable,thus the Project meets Performance Standard(MPS) (Development Location). • LVI-4!2:The Project involves multi-story development and is proposed within currently disturbed and impervious areas on previously developed site.Thus,the Project does not involve substantial deviation from MPS LU14:,( omPact Development). LUF3-As the Project does propose capital facilities or infrastructure and isnot on or adjacentto,agricultural lands,the standarda under GoalS1U2(Capital Facilities and Infrastxupturc)AndLIJ3(Rural Lands)do not apply. Li74.,Thl?r,Ojeet neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant 'impacts upon the Land Use Goals of RPP and standards thereunder,and thus does not .require substantive DRI review for the RPP issue area of Land Use,which is hereby scoped out o(DR,treview. • • .•• , , 4 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • EDFi.The Project Site.is located within a mapped Industrial Service and TradeArea,•thtis the Project meets MPS EDj..1(Location in Economic Centers). • gDF2.,The Project is not located on agricultural,waterfront or recreational lands.Therefore, . MPS,ED1.4,(Resonrce-baSed Economic Areas)does not apply. EDF&The Project does not involve gaming.Therefore,MPSEri2-1'(Gaming)does not apply. . As the Project does not propose any capital facilities or the standards • under Goal Et).4(Infrastructure Capacity)do not apply to the'Project E,DFS.The Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Economic Development Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder,and thus does not require substantive DRI review for the RPP issue area of Economic Development,, which is hereby scoped out of review., WATER RESOURCES WRFi.Although the Project Site is located within Commission-mapped Water Resources 'protection areas,the Project is connected to public sewer,is expected to result in de,winimus changes.to site-wide nitrogen loading,,and does not propose an increase in the storage of hazardous wastes or materials.Additionally,the Project is registered with Ma-9.5DEr as-a Very Small Quantities Generator of hazardous wastes,and the Applicant has supplied a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.Thus,the Project consistent with the MPS under Water Resources • • Cipe.coalotato'ChipVactory-Expansio ,Hyannis,MA DRI Scoping Decision pap 4 of 12 • • Goals`WR (General Aquifer Protection),WR2(DrinkingWater'Qualityand Quantity),WRY; (Marine Water Enibaymeritaand-Estuaries),WR4(Freshwater Ponds and Lakes),and (Water Quality Improvement Areas). WRF2 Water Resources,Goal WR6(Public and:Private Wastewater Treatment Facilities)does not apply to the Project as the site's wastewater treatment facility serves to pre-treat wastewa€er prior`to conveyance to the publicsewer,-and theMPS under Goa].WR6 only apply to private facilities that will conv effluent to in ground leas etures. ham` WRF3 While the Project does notinvolve significant ehaugesto storinwater patterns and treattneznt orimpervious coverage on the Project Site,theproposed Upgrades will result in•an overall improvement of stormwater treatment.Thus,the Project consistent with the-MPS Under Water Resources'Goal WR7(Stormwater Quality); • WRF4 The Project neither involves substaitial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Water Resources:Goals of the,RPP and standards thereunder:The Project does 110t,require substantive DR,I review under the issue area of Water Resources,and this issue area. is hereby°scoped out of DRI review. NATIT,RAL RESOURCES;. NRFi The Project Site is mapped as Significant Natural Resource Areadue to the presence of the Wellhead:Protection Area,but the Project is not anticipated to negatively affeCt the resources protected by#his mapping.Additionally,the Project Site does'not contain,and is not proximate to wetlands;or wetland buffer zones,and is•not located on the coast or offshore: The Project does not propose to disturb or alter more than two;acres of previously undisturbed land,and-is- located primarily onpreviously developed areas of the site,thus the Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the Open.Spaceand Recreation,Coastal Resources,Marine Resources,Wetlands,apd'Wildlife and Plant Habitat;; Goals of the RPP and standards thereunder,and the Project does require substantive DRI • review under these RPP issue or sub issue areas,which are hereby scoped out of DRI review; TRANSPORTATION TRFi.AA transportation memorandum("Transportatton'1llendo ) submfited as part of the application materials,prepared by VH$,dated.Ma:rch 27,2o17,provides:transportation information in support of the a 'ppheahon.pp TRF2.Commission Transportation staff met with:members of the Applicant's-development team and the transportation engineer in February and March of 2017.respectively,to discuss the. nature ofthe:project and potential impacts on the transportation system. - TRFF3 The characterization the of project in tthe Transportation Memo as"an"upgrade to the existing manufacturing facility to modernize and improve efficiency"and`better accommodate the tours which are;aiready an-active part of operations"appropriately characterizes the Project regarding the RPP issue area.:of Transportation. CapeCod Potato Chip Factory_Expansion,Hyannis;MA ))R.I Scope g Decision:: • Page 5,of 12 'TRF4:_The trip gene atxola est ttaates;are based on,trip generation';data in instzt t to of Transportation Engineers'(ITh)Plp Generation,9td Edition,for Land tjJse Code(WC)14o, Manufacturing,which is.an accurate characterization of the site,and the calculations were :performed in;accordance with TeChnical Bulletin 96,o03.The estimated increasa intraffic from the Project during different time periods as as presented in Table i., Table 1•Estimated Project Trip Creneration Trip Generation(trips). Existing Site' 1'roposeci Site • Tune>P;eriod' Net,New Trips Traffic% Tr e2 Weekday Daily Trips 130! 198 +68 Weekday AM Peak Hour 2.4 37' +13 Weekday PM;Peak Flour 26: 38 +13 • Based on,1TE WC 14o,Manufactunng,3414 square feet. 'eased;gn ITE•LUC 140,*mica,during,simo square feet TRF5,.As presented in the TranSportation Memo,VEB conducted a sight:distance evaluation of ;. the site-driveways and;foundthat sufficient stopping sight distance is prodded.The Transportation:Memo presents a Motor vehicle,crash analysis for:the mostrecent five-year period available(2010-2014)'for the-site driveways.and the intersection of Independence Drive.; at Breed's Hill Road.During this analysisperiod,uo crashes were reported at the site driveway 'with one,;property damage crash reported at the of Independence Drive at Breed's Hill Road: TRF6 The Transportation Merino presents a capacity analysis of the site driveways and the intersection of Independence'Drive at Breed's Htil Road under toy Existing Conditions,2024 No Build Conditions,and 2024 Build.Conditions,This analysis indicates that the Project will have a negligible impact on the operations of these intersections. TRF7.No changes to sites ccess along"Bree.d's dill Road are proposed as part of the Project.The internal site circulation will.be Unproved by relocating the loading and adding a dedicated pedestrian walkway between the parking lot<and"'the facility These site improvements will eliminate a conflict that currently exists between truck and pedestrian,improving safety., TRF8 The Sco ping CheckliStiorlited Development of Regional Impact(DTI)con sins the. following transportation related questions: • Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis,> A. DRIScopingDecision Page 6 of.i2 Table 2.Transportation Scoping Questions • • Alt the project generate No the project row not generate more than 250 more than 256.new_daily trip ? new`daily.tr PS. Will the>project generate more than 25 new peak hour No,the project winnot generate more than z5 trips at a high:croslt new peak hour trips through a• high crash • Location? location.: Ices;the project site abuts Independence Drive(a • 1?oes the project have;direct regional road),'but;site access is provided from access on or:does the.project breed's Hill Road.(a local road) No significant abut arregionaI roadway? transportation impact is anticipated on the regional,roadway: TRF9 Based on the preceding_findings,the Project:neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant u ipacts upon tl a Transportation Goals of the-RPP'end standards; :thereunder.The Project does not require substantive DRI•reviewunder,the RPP:issue area of Transportation,and.this issue areaiis hereby scoped out of DRI review: WASTE MAhtkotmENT WMFi,The Project islocated withina Wellhead Protection Area,,but does not-propose an increase in the amounts of hazardous materials or wastes stored or produced at the Project Site.. Additionally,the Project is registered with MassDEP as a Very_Small Quantities Generatorof hazardous wastes Further,,the Project w ll not create significant amounts of solid waste during the construction phase aside<from wastes:produced by thedismantling of the existing visitor tour,area and:office;space on site;and thus.does not require the;pieparation of.a construction 'and demolition wasteplan WMF2,The Project;neither involves substantial deviation from;nor would have significant impacts upon theWaste Management Goals.of the RPP and standards thereunder.The;Project :does:not require substantiveDRI,review under the RIP issue area of WasteManagement,and this issue area ishereby scoped out of DRI review. E • NERGY'; EFi.The Project proposes to.conaplywith Goal Ei(Einissions andlnergy Use)through a .coninuttnentto,a variety of sustainability initiatives outlined in the.application:materials:: Recognizing the-Project entails"an addition to a i08p's-era'manufacturing facility,it would likely u be,prohibitiv.:ely difficult for the Project to meet the-requirements'under Coal Ei,by retrofitting: Cape God Potato Chip Factory Expansion,Hyannis Mti, ARI Scoping'Decision. Page 012 the:a fisting portions of.the faCuity, and the sustainabiltty'iiitiat ves out iced adequatelyaddress= the.:intent Of Goal E .EF2:The Project neither navolves substan tial deviation from uor>would}nave significant impacts upon the Energy Opals of the'RPP`and standards thereunder The Project does not require: substentive:DR review under the RJ'P issue area of Energy,and=this issue„area`is hereby scoped; -out of:DRI review; AFPORDAB E HOUSING AHF :The Project-is located within;an Industrial Service and Trade Areas As mapped on the `LUVM f orthe Town of Barnstable,which is,equivalent to being.mapped as an,Econom ic.Center for the;purposes of the RPP issue area of.&ffordable Housing, AIIF2 In:accordance with'1 IPS AH$1(Mitigation Standard),the Project's community :contribution is calculated under the use of"Other"in accordance with Technical Bulletin 10 oo1. AFH3 ;Cape Cod Potato Chips fallsundertt a NAJCS code"Other Food Manufacturing"as used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment Statistics(0ES).Roughly of jobs wiit in,the sectornationally paybelow average wages per the,OES The OES average wage ($23 86/hour;nationally and$23.66/hour for Barnstable County)is similar to income Emits for affordable housing for those making 8o%of Area"Median Income($22:88/hour for Barnstable County.). AFH4.MPS Aii3a currently a payment $1$,74 0 8o for the.use.of"Other"for the Project.; • AFH5;The Applicantlias agreed to'malke a payment in the amount of$ 8,74o_8co to`be used toward'the development of Affordable Housing,in the Town of Barnstable,and',thus,as:so conditioned herein,the Project neither involves substantial deviation from nor would have significant impacts upon the,Af fordable:Hgusing Goalsof the RPP and standards thereunder: The Project does not require substantive DRI review under the issue area of Affordable Housing, and this issuearea is herebyscopedsoutof DRI`review. HERITAGE-PRESERVATION/'CONflO,rrYCHARACTER :;HPCCFi PPlicant submitted a.ProJ The A " ect,N,otificatton.Form.(PNF)to the Massachusetts Historical Commission(MHC),and MHC certified in writing on March 29,2017 that the Project is unlikely to`impact hastonc,or archaeological resources,meeting MPS>HPCCl`3(Archaeological; Sites).:The Project complies With HPCC11(Historic Structures)and HPCCi 2(Cultural: Landscapes)because the Project will not impact any historic structures:or.cultural,landscapess. HPCCF2 T'he;Project'involves yetoyation and expansion;of an existing manufacturing facility within°an Industrial Service:and Trade Area.The.structure is,currently somewhat shielded from Independence Drive:by existing pinewoods buffer.The Project will reduce the width of this' Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory-Expansion,.Hyanpis,M;A; pRI'Scopiug Decision' <Page 8 of 12 I .. vegetated buffer near the riortliwest;corner of theb u'lding,but additional plantings will provide a similar level.of screen ing= HPCCF3.,Given the Project's screening and its location within a mapped Industrial Service and Trade Area,the RIP allows flexibility in the building design and materials used-under MPS HPCC2 7(Ion-traditional;Materials and Designs).While the structure is primarily a nmetal. bu ildiug,the Project proposes elements that'reference traditional materials and forms on.the newprimaiy facade which includes the employee.and public tour entrance The entrances are designed to;resemble:a lighthouse and small;.gable=ropfed buildings,reflecting the company's =logo Proposed;exterior materials are primarily cementitious clapboards on the,lower half of the <facade<and ce nentitious shingles on the upper half,consistent with•RPR standards.Large windows are evenly spaced across the facade,and most will be functioning•Overall,the proposed additions provide almost 6o feet of facade variation alo tgthenew 484-foot long faeadeEzonsistent with RPP standard HPCC?.6(Building Forms and Facades) 11PCCF4 The Project is located within an Industrial;Service and TradeAre,a and seeks to expand. the building;area within primarily previously disturbed area The expansion of the building will bring part of the structure closer to Independence triva and disturb some of the existing buffer, but the area will be replanted with evergreens,which will provide sufficient additional,buffering of the building;to Independence Drive and.meet MPS HPCC2 9,(Landscape Improvements for Redevelopment) The Project does not involve alterations to the existing parking areas:. .HPCCFS Proposed exterior lightingaud signage are consistent with MPS HPCC2 ii(Exterior lighting)and MPS HPCC2.3..2;(Signage). HPCCF6 The;Project neither involves substantial deviation fromnor would have+signifcant ;mpactsupon.the Heritage Preservation/Community Character Goals of than'''.and standards ;thereunder.The Project does not require substantive DR'review under the issue area of Heritage Preservation/Community Character,aridt is issue area is hereby scoped out of DR,I review:. 'CONCLUSION` Eased on theforegoh g Endings,the Comm ssion hereby further finds and determines that the :Project as described intins deeisiondoes not involve substantial deviation from the minimum performance standards of the R,PP,does not have signiScant impact upon the purposes;and values identified Section One of the Act,does not require funnier DRl review and that the Applicant may proceed with local permitting forthe Project without Anther DRI`review,,subject to.the conditions below. ,CONDITIONS. • Ci Applicant may undertake and obtin:local perinitting for the Project without further DRI review,pursuant to and consistent with this terms and conditions of this decision,within a ::period>of seven years from the date bf this decision;which time may be-etkended by the Commission,upon good cause shown by the Applicant Cape:(od Potato Chip.Factoiy Expansion,Hyannis,MA DRI Seopimg Decision Page9•of 12. Ca. This decision.shah be appurtenant to and run with the property which is the subject Project Site.;The decisions]iall bind and be enforceable against,and inure to the benefit of,the' • Applicant,its heirs,successors,and assigns; C3.Failure to comply,and remain in compliance,with all findings and conditions stated herein shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this decision. C4•The Applicant shall obtain all necessary federal,state,and local permits for the Project C5.This decision"shall"not be valid and effective until a copy of the same.has been recorded with the Barnstable Regist y of Deeds.The Commission shall record a copy of this decision with the Barnstable`Registryof Deeds,-with�recording costs borne by the.Applicant,<after the decision's appeal period pursuant to Section17 of the Cape Cod Convi3ission Act has elapsed,or if such an appeal has been filed,after'the appeal has been finally dismissed,settled or is adjudicated or otherwise"disposed of in favor of the Applicant No local development permit that naigilt be' issued forthe proposed development approved herein shall be valid or effective Until the Cor►u niasion has so recorded a copy of this<decision. • C6.The Project shall be undertaken,constructed and maintained in accordance withthe Findings and Conditions set out herein,includingtthe plan sets and other information and documents referenced herein under Finding GF6 Changes to the approved Project andio the approved project plans Shall require modification to this decision,in accordance with the Modificationcsection of the-Commission's Enabling Regulations then ui effect when such modification is sought.All plans and documents required'tobe subxaitted.as conditions.of"thisi decision shall hereby be incorporated into this decision as and when received,reviewed,and approved by the Commission. • C7;Prior to,and as a condition to issuance of a Building Permit or uiidertaking any development as approved:herein,including but not limited tosite work and installation of foundations or �ontin s the Applicant shall obtain a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance from the Commission at evidences that all conditions in this decision requireed,to have been satisfied prior to the of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance have been satisfied,and that the Project"is in compliance with this decision: C8.Prior and-as a condition to issuance of any Preliminary Certificate of Compliance by the Commission for development as approved herein,the:Applicant shall submit copies of final. project plane as.approved,and permits,licenses and approvals issued,by state,federal,and local authorities(except for aBuilding Permit)for review by Commission staff who shall determine their consistency with this decision.If Commission"staff deternnines'`that the final lans are• nsistent with those project: lams ap roved referenced and inco grated herein, the App heat,shall be re qu ire to seek a itnodifi a approval of the.project plane anges by the mrn scion inaccordanceewith the"Modifi.cai on" section of the Cotimaission's;Enablmg Regulations in effect atthe time the modification is sought. Cape Cod Potato Chip;Factory EXpansion,Hyannis,l A ART S,coping Decision Page io ofa2 , • C9.Prior to and.as;a condition toW issuance of a Prelimb ary Certificate of'Complianee,the Applicantshall ;rovidewritten'proof to the Commission that a copy of this decisi ,receive by the Project gene contractor This decision an a.."copy of approved plans for the project shaji be maintamed.on the Project-Site.throughout project construction Cio:Prior to and-as a'condition to issuance of a Certificate of Use/Occupancy for the Project by the Town,the Applicant shati obtain a,Fiial Certificate of Compliance from the Commission that evidences that allrconditions in this decision required to have been satisfied prior to issuance'of • a`l final Certaficate;of Compliance;have been satisfiediand that the Project is in compliance with. this decision. Commission staff wilt undertake a review of the Projects compliance with this decision,; including the.applicable,conditions hereof,upon the Applicant's request to the Commission for issuance of a Preliminary or Final Certificate of Compliance At the time the Applicant requests; such a certificate,it shall provide,Conwi ssion staff a'list of keyproject contact(s),along with their telephone numbers,mailing addresses,.and email addresses,-in the event questions arise during the Commission's compliance review.As part-of its compliance review,Commission staff may make,and the Applicant hereby authorizes,orizes a site inspection,as needed,at reasonable times andupon reasonable notice to the..Applicant.Upon review,the Commission shall either prepare and issue:the requested Certificate,or inform the Applicant in writing of any •compliance deficiencies and the remedial action required for the issuance of the requested Certificate: C12 Priorto and as a,condition totissuance of a Final Certificate of Compliance,the'Project shall. payto the-Barnstable County Treasurer uz care of the,Commission an affordable housing mitigation paymentof$i8,746 8:0;which payment.ghallbe held for and madeavailable to-the Town of Barnstable to support projects'or strategies that increase the availability of affordable housing in the Town;: SEE NEXT PAGE FOR SIGNATURES • Cape:Cod Potato DChipRf Factoing ry Deci Expsioansionn ,:Hyannas'MA Scop Page la dig 1 • ,SiGNATUR.ES • • Executed this /0.yin 'day of. ;UUl y '2017. rgnature • Print;Name and1itle CQMMONI v0.:A TH OF 11�1 $SACRUSETTS Barnstable,ss � y ,2o17 Before me,the-undersigned notary;public,•personally appeared p C . • in his er capacity-as e { CC/io of the Ca a Cod Commission,; lh � � L�(n'��= � - P whose name is signed on the preceding document,and such person acknowledged to me that he/she signed.such document voluntarily ior its stated purpose. The identity of such person was' . proved to me.through satisfactory evidence of identification,which was[ ]photographic identification with signature issued by federal or:state governmental agency,;[ ]oath or affirmation of a credible witness,or g.ersonai knowled e o f the undersi ed. � P �. • OAj1,P HRNI,EY • 00).#4k to 11ASSACNtCBETa6{ • MycgrninjUipl► Notary Public. se>xensa,aofe SF,, ,. Nty Commission Expires• Ag • • • • • Cape'Cod Potato Ci ip Factory;Expansion,Hyannis,IV A.: • DRIScopiiig°.Decision Page 12:of12+, • 3225 MAIN STREET • P.O. BOX 226 k\,,„„,,,„,., BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02630 . c- CAPE OD (508) 362-3828 • fax(508) 362-3136 • www.capecodcommIssion.org COMMISSION ri 73 _< t HEARING NOTICE _: co CAPE COD COMMISSION ti m Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Renovation & Expansion #LR17008 July 6, 2017 The Cape Cod Commission will conduct a public hearing on Thursday,July 6, 2017 at 3:oo p.m.in the First District Courthouse,Assembly of Delegates Chambers,3195 Main Street(Route 6A),Barnstable,MA. The following Development of Regional Impact(DRI)Scoping application was submitted to the Cape Cod Commission under Sections 3 and 5 of the Cape Cod Commission's Enabling Regulations Governing Review of Developments of Regional Impact. The Commission will consider . and potentially vote on a draft written DRI Scoping Decision for the project which,if adopted by the Commission,would allow the applicant to proceed with local permitting for the project,subject to the DRI Scoping Decision,without the requirement for any further DRI review. This notice is being , , published as required by Section 5 of the Cape Cod Commission Act. Project Name: D Cape Cod Potato Chip Factory Renovation and Expansion . , Project Applicant: 0 S-L Snacks MA,LLC , Project Site/Location:' Breed's Hill Road, Barnstable,MA Project Description: Proposed redevelopment of the existing 5.63-acre manufacturing facility site with the demolition of the existing 3,30o s.f.visitor tour area and office space,reconstruction of the visitor tour area and office space with a 10,93o s.f.addition,the relocation and expansion of the existing loading . and warehouse spaces including a 10,050 s.f.addition,and associated site improvements including improved pedestrian connections from the existing parking areas to the visitor entrance and additional/revised landscaping. Anyone wishing to testify orally will be welcome to do so. Written comments may also be submitted at the hearing,or delivered or mailed to the Cape Cod Commission,P.O. Box 226,3225 Main Street, Barnstable,MA o263o for receipt before the date of the hearing. The application,plans and relevant documents may be viewed by calling the Cape Cod Commission office at(508)362-3828 to schedule an - appointment between the hours of 8:3o a.m. and 4:3o p.m. If you are deaf or hard of hearing or are a t person with a disability who requires an accommodation,contact the Cape Cod Commission at (508)362-3828;for Telecommunications Relay Services(TRS)dial 711. - .:r' • Caso estas informacoes sejam necessarias em outro idioma,por favor,contate o Coordenador de Titulo VI da MPO pelo telefone(508)362-3828 or Para servicos de retransmissao de telecomunicacoes, disque 7.n. , SITE ANALYSE TABLE 100 BREEDS ELL ROAD,HYMNS,NA 021101 a ` PROJECT IDM@ SRm-unm IOIHIRN. - PRDJdt WD USE: moTIWE,MIT O'c0a NWEMtURDOWlff OWE OM) NOTES: - �__ - PARCEL Mk 11N ACRES AS SHOWN.PROPOSED PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUS - - - _ . Mica 5) 311/m3 EXIS ING SITE IS GRANDFATHERED-IN FOR LOT COVERAGE IN EXCESS OF IM it E Rat/ L71E X IMP 1 bro1.411 CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS PENDING EXISTING CONDRIONS SURVEY gR IAm11EE a LEMUR 4TAa•50R1E'u1YMlAY1 -�-'- - d BASED UPON THE PRE-1987 ALLOWANCE.OF 75�LOT COVERAGE ^�_�- - 88 DIPLOME. BM SST-30 -_— _- mw nmRnE>rr: E7mTP¢ P O.Sr _ _ - • _---- _ ^� ., o6iut®M. - - 33.aaa1:y _ �_ __ ---------_ /� pp 001 0 WOtRER: - 31,m s Absm]s - _-------- W Rom M E RMn(TARX yE Y PAVED AP. - lRlAl]sr 92.11 S' _———- -` T f g E SPERM.VICE - 0 1.11RO01• 5)Si S±R>< _ _ _ -----—-_ —----- � 1 Q ° appSPP� _ __--- ____-- ---_ y PROA)SA 3II1. MP•auvIM Der 113 113 @;a MA O -01 tw SrIeuMu6 II 113 TO 1Rtun 17astw TO tEttw - , .03T OWES - T __-- 1101L/6Tt3ET MPARDOME - a a -— 1HfaMY Be010 1F]WF. 3C ZI4 3n — 00 m MOW EX* 1[''''' SCE YAM t a INDEPENDENCE ---- H� --___— l— —a _. -- Sr AR 37 - tan Ma Mode ti/ _ --- - • / _--__— — — i — — — \ —— • I5 O. — — � iPaY5=•� 1T5..B � � ,® -- - I IO ` 0N�I��1'3TEa0ay � . :\:... 70:(....s.s...5),,.....7-7::::::.wpw.:71 -5 ,� Il. . I „..,,,,,,,,..,..,-.A.,,,-,..„,,,,,-.„..:_,„ s iC �] .:$ _ 1 // — � / R = ' ` � x r ; , 1� — ,�TT`' 7vv- I II I • , PROPOSED RODENTP P) 46 i =. _ — / VRBYMDM6A 1yi1 P/v l / y e . i I '''' II f LI — e �I k_ �Y // I r •�-- -- PROPOSE, GRAVEL Z ,- -- - _ Ell { R 3iA} iiO4 ZO •I 1fi _______— / PROSPA VOeN E �_ I _ 1 FI $i ---- 'qlp 1N3%6Eyt � 1 \ . ___ __ _ Q'%r�l > M ( I tJ _ _-_.I z ;tn m I / mL w_.a pROPd Fa T SUH1 �.Eons M w P3s2j11�1 0 } t u, coo 5W•D'lP) mem Ei --i -------,I�-------- i 1 11 _ N // 69` 'Ai 13C.MIUIIIIIE CORPRULE SIZE CO) •_________ ---- ------ ___I I J = u r i F ,.R o %•� ®m°wa°tac ate Po�n3 etill �I --------- ------------ :------- z r A �. pl PRapaSD (� A PNCd:EPA 3 PAmEL) j Y h --- --- I • U) Q �� POSTAL 100 BREEDS HILL ROAD i _ _ _ ___-_-_ -_ --1 _ \\ PARCEL 60 BREEDS HILL ROAD L F ________{__-- _ I 5O'•� I 30 .i /!C\ \ ZONED:INOLTD 1 ___-_ __________ _ __ ___ EXISTING MANUFACTURING FACILITY PROPOSED m. I_ � FFE=65.00 , 91�mE u¢ \ s WIIM 1E11F1iRB I ' ,,,, Kr-7 \ : i \ , / \\\ Ea51Ra MAWS ttwlnr¢ Pa,. ..�/ RB TO I . m ASPHALT 1 ------- ---`-- .J \ EMILNOCE TO PROCESS AREA /CCM MI MT EGER. ii MLR MMHG 1 I 'i - : i NalMOW.l CNNN \\ \ \\\ E 1L-1 A-d I1.1 I PpBecBI I 'nII ., ., `\ \\ / III �uC- I ),o _ 7'7.1I PROTCSm mua pfr-- ,.....--, 1 \ `-rv``.� ,. , i . `` 1 •\� „, 5 PAVEMENT 11 0/ - x`•e"'`•J. II /' 1 .... MANSION1 - EXISTING WWIF on// II I I P^ g \• \ate., PROPOSED, I i - ❑ 0❑ I 4 SITE ��� '\ ,\ I , ROLLED aw TO �! ♦ I �l ILLJS \\\\ II �.1 I PLAN I 'I - II \\ \ `O\ MATCH Elaalaktk. I_ - El u�- ��. —_�i�s�'�.�II 08 � • STM . _ -- /1I� r-Z=/ Phillip Bemnl k m » l�°' w I !- r - -,\ c-..e Really Trvn yea a llti `oa � - I L o -- o - 44 1, Transformer L,_ .1 Nc 5 47363B'R Nv "A30.0a' Np —Eme�vl L :i1 :I±-------" =- v. Par.) Pcooln 8 cern. E: --____— B -- -- Peden o \ L ez o B R_1 55 3.T C,B I. - 6,4225 --a --.====�¢r - -.� gg• gg _ BREEDS HILL RDAD v k 5 tW tlet N1m4 ME1 '' 0 1 i - - - - - — — - - - — — — _ — — — — — - _ 1c<8 o O J'"-. - 1 3 e e--e s H TLL •/ / JOB Na 73006001 • `r _ E..J owyAt RAF 0 10 20 40 I? - CC M'O y S 4//�b SCALE 1•= 20• C1100 ' I»A1PRn Na _ d % __ I ___ ----- — _-- _ --_-_---------- • ------------------ ____ _ y { ..._......4. r... -- ..< 4 1 _-- INDEPENDENCE DRNE 6^e_C = --- ---___ ---_-_- 1rC-PhJw- ------ "----wSZw \-_r23t.tG,Rtaiott�� -- -"�-- - / --- -____�-- Gli ------ J. L_1__Da�+=18 7 Q�D�' -_--- —_________---- -- --— --W_--==—`------ _ — _-- — — — - — — _ --- — _--__ \ __ Xs N t2f�'3Y-E�DRW�� Suet,. 7 - _-_ I \ ` • __ R.25 J 5.UD• - SEBNG[wr*s 9"\ ' I ; rWell MI m`BE W�ro SIM I.-v.- - - 1 erssx w-e::ctn_S.uS I .RDPiiD CIEARDUT ; _ ______ -- _ / PROPOSED r!IV M-6118t I ro t¢Mro eosfmc _ --- . I PatlP05E CIFAtIWf -_'-= 1 \ ('-- ,---r------„ I I // �� raamm rva 1 1 ��� YRDPoStD PN • \p II I / 1 I Div 8212 C _/ t•55 PP0P6ED Mld'.am WWf511 /\ f AHD i8E WAtEA SFSNICE _---II , / R1CID11M'WIII@1 8WI➢DR ' •.,t I— J 1 i i nr I I --- I I r // ,(? / \ I t___------ -------- I ' / / JR 11 I�- 1 L � / �O. PRO USE _ I- U 0 I POSED WAREHOUSE \ V� I Q�oQos FFE= ss.aD .1q,;P EXPANSION 11 1 I �%!!I/ll�� . // _ \ I �P�Po4D D•FAE I, y ------- ------I' '=MK__* ,' ____------------- `4,' I ;\ \ ,2 )(3 wxE t --------- I / t 0 RmrDSFD armour AI i 1 N pry_ . �-J - ..----- __� �► rRolaaYD $_ IIffD SaDfAJ(!IWBarIE I J L124 iDD A01-5625 ------------------- -------------- ---------- F I ' , CBNdR_51.8 I / Z j X. a-DrvM_stsD '• i g I %moo , o D Div D-sty ------ --------- I U) LLi v T r II'� 1\ POSTAL 100 BREEDS HILL ROAD se"'-'-' °• 1 1 %�1Jl� \ PARCEL 60 BREEDS HILL ROAD / __--=-4-- __---_— ._--_-- I W C ZONED:INDLTD ---I -EXISTING MANUFACTURING FACILITY a+my vsm� I _ 2] • FFE=65.00 s _. ._ / 1 J s-- PRoPoSED MR To RE Roam --------t----'---- I �\ I \\ pROPOsED et aim,ammo' - 'i. �'/ I n�"�'m,Mo r r OUT ro gym)"-" ' -`- . I W / 1;1 WNRUCIDN In warm Pam=r NO M-actO* 11aCN .Ii• o 11 e I \\\ m st�_so %w in/ tom%R \ X°mw�c r°ua k �.a I---O--- { .. 1 E. x F \\\ - III , ► j , ' E 1 ,, i . \ ,i- 4 w,k, \--_,:li i ..,7; 1 i, \ \ \ J 0 I -?',' 1 \ \ 1 % 2 ILITY I I1 d / IE = 1 I \ill —. ——� I I EXISTING WWTF V} {q II(.._): \jl u I / OVERALL s / II \ / 1\ I(L\ —— — —J,.———�———�— ll� -�---�——— /�� ^L-——� n - �\` IIII_Join I PLnN II _U a • I I II 1 1 N; -L:� w-�;m.. . 1 \ -� /�1\ WE Phtlp W BawE a -(ire:w M I II 1 __ —_ III I • �M1n EL putt WI�eltMtsa Trust — a il• \\� II I d��L— o—_- N. _��— , / / J ' l—2:0 I ----com n.nM a Nr.e.etTmi I 1 z c 5 Male W. t.18.00' ��- . BENfJYVdC ---____---M -__-- /- -- R o 6 CB/M _ - I dv - BREEDS HILL ROAD - o - d 9 Yn • •3 .BY MM Pawl.ll0' i a 0 C 1 3. - - - - - - - - - - - — - -- — _ exmwD vea _ _ - _ m— _ �� _ �& JDe Na 73006001 MOOR RAF , 10 S 20 40 SCALE 1••=20' - - SCALE .`_ 20' C1200 1< • . DRAav+n ND. • _ -- INDEPENDENCE DRIVE - _— ————---- —--————— CO pima 1 \ —' / /--- / ��� -- �� N43fCSY'P'ri200`Yr \. I�\\ \. \\\ \ I \ \^ \ \ \ I r�('�- ��j'%i- ==_ — — -II I 6Y / _ /'_--/---C-- - —=_� = �\1 rI_=_=� —I 1 I11 ) \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 1\( III =_ 1 - i' 1\�- L,�,se- --- -= __^�\�--��'% - S , , ( / -��/ I I I 1 I I)\ \ \ \ \ \ �I I1.I11l �lrr/, rILI`' �-_�Th;,-��1� 7 1a i / - -==T_�- _ �� --= \_l ?�__.� -------,...-\�,\\� %�- __< �I I >- - / i �/ \ \\ \ \ \ I III 1�\\ 1\ ICI"-/ - 1 ./I I / ! l �_----- z= __ '- \�-//%/t' e: \\\�: s5��� �-� / ; J / III III I / �=1 ,l,N ;� � 1 I I / I I I - ..--___=--�\\ �/ /1 /\\`� / \ \\\\ 66�' ro i/ < \ \ \ \ 1 I l- \\\ \11 l I I --- ---=---\\\\\ ./ —,pL� --- .� iiv � 5. ,y —. / I / / \ J Jl,��I,�III I I \\`�\� _J� Wi t`` I J%)I/ / / / 1 �I� //!r 7- _ __ \\\��� —,\�\ \� \ \•,_ 1 , L—�— /, , \ , 66 e6i rJJG_�_ ------- �\\\ �//I ynowsmsowan J' /�j�ii -----'i' i��\\\\�= i� \\ \\.;l/l/ / 0 ' I //l / \ \ \ 1 / / l --1WNWELP991PIE �-- �,e •/ • � 1 / 111/l /� l l / \ - i . \\\� ( I \( I \ _/ / ) / / / "`o'f, gNNME � — C•' �s9 I 0 69 ,/ Vt'114111P''''N, 1 /: 7' / —_ /�/ / / / �roeEm� /�� / % i // r� \ 1 Pram 9 /� III/II i.'/ l ✓� l l / // .I\ \` I f I I. \ \\\ /�_ l l cr' ..`. �j/III I. Il I l l // I \J I 11\%lji I 1 %\ �\- 'i''� �'-/a " /// ���i ���,!�© ®\�\ \i 1 SwP I I /J/ / I � �� / / ,�'_. I\\\\ BII / .2i1 III I I Il 1 I I �f _ //- '�0 OAR / / .I ( // / / 1 / / a / / / 11 1 I 1 I II`--- -PRO;000mm old— / `� v— / III// /11 __ - / / / / 11 1 I I l 1 . I I /- ..IY .,�'l �rI I 1 I 1 ( I- / 11 / l �✓ I - � LL0 pP PROPOSED WAREHOUSE 1 1 1 I / ('-_.. / y / / / / III I I \ I I 1 1 � i i� i O �p5F0 pgP650p / EXPANSION I 1 I \\\ \\\( 4 / .i I ,! -- /-- I- / / \ / / / I11I I 1 I I I _ACCESSIBLE RAO'DETESTABLE c fTE 0? FFE=61.00 1 I 11 / 7 / / / ! I \ > ( I II 11 I 1 I I II ----_ `mG` r ..' �/►�•• • I / I I J1//// / / / / �t �' (\ I II I1 _ 1 I1•. ••'" `lt, / ' IIII///// -/ - / / / / h. I/ \ I I 11 \ J .roi . -p I I I I (� / / / / / I L- 1 / \\\ /lI 11 /I II o. / / II I � — / / /- / / / I 1 I 1. \ 1 1 r i alt® I I ISroR MRER r ' 1 I l I \ / / i�i ''" t . l iIIII III! i/jf77z— 1 'X5 N9 ST9 MY.," _ / - ---- / - -- / 1 1 I$m \ / /;i' J II r, suuP uu':4111u ,z•ord f� / / 1 3 \ \�. ..,./ /j ` NAVE SW :/.9 TOP-".8° I JmP, l i I //l(11�/�^ / 1 -6 1 =,._,,/� / / T / 1 1\1 / Y \ /,/ C PN_g�H IIMMCOSSE r�s ©, J - yy - Nuyq'- .I \. ,,,— /. .q SIWP Eu". —,J,Nra —1,, r \ I / 1 I' / Y____ / >4, I r ' I 1\ I r —_ / / 1 - am�leTOIr Ur. a j . I \\III////// /' / / .--'I- -I k / w z If. -. ) r r / / `w"'4 - smwtwnnN aruuor +z•nM_s�.ao I -O I l /-i\L 1 /, r x-as / s+„rriu r .1 1 / I v / I f /. // ./ / /\ \ "/ POSTAL 100 BREEDS HILL ROAD P�,we r ua our_nso _.i•,/ ` Le....1��J�1/{,,-j�i1\\� I�—- / _ 7--'I_ "_�/- / ___ __ E '-�'/s // _ L__ _J( ��e nin / U 0 \ ' / >/ j /``— `, PARCEL 60 BREEDS HILL ROAD Pweosme RNi our-suo Op- ` .II/I l'1 I t I ____4..___i___/____ / ___I _1 \ ___`______I b—Jd I Q ' / / // / ZONED:INLAID COSMC ROOF OEMS ro / /�P RNf --- �! I / / ( // / / EXISTING MANUFACTURING FACILITY SE WIRED 1e �0 -. /. II/I 1/. IJ III ___ / I h"----;--T-- I / / J O 1 / / c] FFE=65.00 UMERGRamuNo°mmrs //// - - REICSATED ��;f 6p I �� i Il �illlrl�r 'j11411I / r I a �;- \ P z P»Rl EPOSED RUMS MO /i' . �� W Z v \,,--_ .,\ / 1 RP„ACm NRPE a / /ir \e\ 11ll���I .{ — \ ---/----'-a----- 1 I_J / , t -� ./ \ Smt0MES mR / Q \ \\ 1L 11)11\1171 - LL Q-' z / /--\ — — �� ; 1 1 III \1 / / `J / I a rah,. �I , IIIIIIII \\\\ i 1 ` I®® \ \\ / w4 �r . CUP * I I\\\ I` �`L ' 5 ' Ilp�lilllllll \l�ll I - 1 I T l I II /�\ 3\ \\ C`— \- SIpMiYAIEA PffE ;\�IIIIIII I, N- / \� �.I' I 9 �� I I ply�-�III I I \ I _- \ i c z v I II \ e 1 All I / \ .o�,;-� / / / J`IIII ` i/ 1�------ I I I \ \ _ `_z_ CO u I \ 11 rI,1111111,.: £ell "• \\ \ y�iy / // AA e9 /),,,,_ / .$ / .:„ , / \\�\� I \ l �_\®\ \\ \ � �1 \ ��/i\� I !I II ( /III\U ., :�, \ \ i'' �/ -- / / �'. / / / -1 \1 \ \ — \ -_Jj �r�r„�, --- II\I �� I 1 ��-�� ' / / 1/ 1 C r I i )/ ///I11!I%i.; \ \ -/ / / a P / / / \ I 1 \ I J r �_ i II I A/ // i` / / / / / °'�"` / Pxm, J / 1 I 1 \ - }I-R q f.al l I r I I I !� T I/(// ( I _ I I\i ri / // / / / / / I„ / / \ I 11� \ :: I, 1 /, I / / H- I 7—� / / l ,/`\_ / l //i / I I 17_,.:- EXISTING WW F. II /' ��` III I�'// fI // I r I / / / / / / / c 1 I I b C�1� u' ' I, // �44 I 1 I, I 111 III \ / j.. / �- / / / I '-P\ \ \ \ \ l L I 1—O n N�; // 11// 1 I'I Iil \\ '\I\I\I\I� / / / / r / ,��/ /. / / / / / / \ _ __ u - — sue` ll�//I// II% 1/\ \IIII\I '-- / / \/ / I ' / / / / / / 1 / J 1 -J \ I \t,= __`-- I I\ I'I,I / \ IIIIII 1 / / 1 11�/ii%%_--- __ — —/ � I III/\ 111� 1I / I Y� l / /$ / / / / / Ex...,�,Nk:n / I /�;„_ -, --r/ 1 / / <<I/' I \i PII \I I 1 I \ I IIII I\\\ / / \/ 1 r / / / / / / �r �� =Eti�HN.^.=i jcJ // /�/////'%% I / / l / JaM1 B P T , I l —- / / / I _ I l / / i�——_ / //////� ,—-1 1 r / / / I 1 t1\ 1\ U N�,�^Nl4T Soren.'" ' 1 I �� = ____=fi_—_, �= - ==�=�� 1 �� \' J /////ii7// _. \ ,. 1 1 / / / I 1 III 1h �� � �=-' /� -�� --� \\\ I Il/„ ,// / � 1 I / / c- I 1 ll \II GIZADINGa I 1 j ^ \ ; / �� ���.� -- 1 \ I 1 �� - \ \ //�//�� / PN�_ NvrEni / \ 1 1 / H \\\ -\ �- Ne \\� \I�\\����- \J, I \ \1I1///( " T- -_ �A , \\ \` t \\%\*\\��(��- �/r ', I I /I,-1 /-__ . 1 Ili I i I /I DRAINAGE jD _Y_ \ (— �.•• • • �,� J PLAN _ '\ r �— s.rse'x•r ao.Po• \ \`\� ��-\'— — \ `�` \ �-c r P ' --"I' \\\I\\ \JI --=s—= == s_ i—_ ----1 ,_ 1 -7 y -Z �� � - cs —\ \fy_ < \ \ '.r1s.26• --\Z .\ : o BREEDS HILL ROAD ——1m7_10 2 sv We Prim+trPl Y1 SCALE i' = 20' s Ei GENERAL NOTES: — — — — — — 11 5 SITE ADDRESS: 100 BREED'S HILL ROAD, HYANNIS, MA 02601 AS SHOWN, PROPOSED PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUS , EXISTING SITE IS GRANDFATHERED-IN FOR LOT COVERAGE IN EXCESS OF CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS PENDING EXISTING.CONDITIONS SURVEY BASED UPON THE PRE-1987 ALLOWANCE OF 75% LOT COVERAGE g SITE IS IN A WELLHEAD PROTECTION ZONE • SITE IS ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, IN INDUSTRIAL PARK WITH ALL INDUSTRIAL ZONED NEIGHBORS SITE IS A ZERO SURFACE DISCHARGE SITE. SOt RELIES ON EXISTING LEECHING PITS FOR STORMWATER - _ 'K DISCHARGE. SEE SHEET C501 FOR DETAIL OF INSTALLED LEECHING PITS (EXISTING AND TO BE.RELOCATED). #a a e EXISTING LEECHING PIT HAVE VARIOUS AMOUNTS OF INTERCONNECTION VIA UNDERGROUND STORMWATER PIPE, - DEPENDING OF LOCATION AND SURROUNDING AREA - a m<g `" NO KNOWN OFFSITE DITCHES OR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER CONVEYANCE DEVICES/STRUCTURES ARE KNOWN 8 SURROUNDING THIS AREA . •- - JOB NO. 73006001 PROPOSED DISTURBED AREA AS SHOWN IS APPROXIMATELY 36,000 SE CONSTRUCTION EROSION AND SEDIMENT ' CONTROL MEASURES ARE EXPECTED BUT SITE WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN NPTES CONSTRUCTION ... - - ow:wrt RAF _ GENERAL PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTMTIES UNLESS DISTURBED AREA EXCEEDS 1 ACRE (43,560 SF) N. C1300 • cOFONNO NO. aa; 0091.0 - •OZ.-.1. 31ras - .. ,' dV2f asxvae - - 1.00900EL 'ON Mt • 8 MI"""' DE0iiiiiii . 1 — — — — — - — — A •0Z = .l INDS a s wad pus as ,R . 0q pZ 0 L�f! c 0V0a IIIH S03399 7.gym _ .m?a am•m.a�0 a z•csa tee \� i_.--� \ --T= �_—< --C. - -- —_ 1�=-_—�.__� .'_. __— 6 Nt/ld ? / —_- f'•'- I '-J =\\\�\\\ \ 9' /' t- - 1 r `� \ ��y,- -°m�t //� `° C\ H%!e; \� T JNIdVOSONVI \ e. ---,J �))\/� 1 --�� .1 �..--� / :/ \ 11VL13A0 I l I � �i/� ®a m �' d \—�^\=\� /� ` - - —\ cs /i \\\\` l r li` �u 4 \ " i—=�� / \,.oa,.111.1j47 I I / / , I : //a:aoa,<,em y , ( J i/lij/jf,�/ k • / — «,u awsn ® / y� I ' ' I I o \ -- -- i \ \ I /, i r � \ , � , i _ I1l`\ / / ;� -., I II I ii tri It ❑ I ) / f —I ; , ! a % I I ' iI, I I \ a -iII D / /` / '''''..._.,..MI-AL: 1 -..Ik'lli L—=',.-=-=r= =c=---- \ \ 1 / 4. \ / / '< I 1�\ i \. ®\\ 1�'t; t I -—!.. m ,\ 1 , \ L ( ■ \-s more ys owt •�\/ 6y/ ‘......to/ '{�5. \\ — ' tl .I�,/ I I -ifFii \ „, r -G / I I' �1 it tl _ ,st0 `/ ( I 'I`` I I )I I Illtotil''c' 11-1 / '-' \\ 7i a \\�\; 1I-G rn I i ( �, ,`�� IIIII ,I liorgf ��, \\. / , Z 9 04 pie \ -- �� guio�+Yam�s�axsacs I `" Y.I , • • �'n'^"�ONIafll0Vdf1NVW 0N051X3 `'.°'$ / / /' 1 i I :1:1L'I-- ,E O1l0Nl eN00Z \ / i • D D v' ' / 11)%"( i OVO?1 IIIH S033MB 09l3�Ltld \ b --.� i^" „a - I Z Y{I A 1 / I 1;//�/�n1 �.,/'� avoa TIIH'S03399 00t "IvlsOd �� / 'pl' Ia* o z m ' mammas'I ` ~� / ! ;/ 1 n';/ 'fit'� 11 \'� i i ,, 1 1 I d / it r .. l � I - ': \ � ti$ \ / / !r I I J �I 1 111 \ / ray)„�.,. qp I \ 0049= ye \�N soao� // /" 1 1 I I 1.1 /I / 0 ( yc I . 1\�\(I asnorrN°�'vSM u3sodoad °�° o�� /� // I ( I 1 i '1 j cap�., / ! i ry o - I I/I 1� -%j , qo f /7 ° i ;' % �)� i .1 11 1 � I./I I �� % I iTDaii W6N.5a1M / // ( _ — ( ///'/ / // ��l 9a ,� 1 / 1 / 1 , \ \ , :.= ......._.,..../ I i ) \ \I / r i n / /�/��-,-1`-- /�i== —\ 1 ( (= .% =c= \ /1 ./ �� ��tiis A:� �;11°-jr� !i:, - � a /9 / \\\ �— —— ——— ®` / I 1 -_= OV54.3 \ _• 1 ' I i I I \ / �4. � �•��/ / /, \\\� _____ J L-_.__ � B 6l \ ti.-LI �\`_ - -_- —�' —. -io ( i^ N \ �N , - / • / "�\\ \===y Ir�/ .-- ---'_�z._`�'9e9i=e _air— / • __� -- _' ii J�r4i .J \ \ +\ \ \r �\ �t --r .� _� ' ^ ---___--- �—`—_ -T-— �T a — jS `- '� -_ —`-'—�_�j,. �� -�. 1 \ I --_-----_'—__J �,pp901 3.tteLP N \—— A /, \ Cp� _�__-- —=--==—' mil.---' ) 1 \ \ aw \ -- — .�-- _----- 1 reear ___.---__. --._._—_— 3 ___ .__- --- MA awa wv,AO/ --------—-- in N210 30N3oN3d3oNl ——_—— —