Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0000 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE : _ 0 r 3J 0 n - a 1 - ,__nu. .... . o ,. ti _ - A J0 ` �.. �. .. t .. .... . _ - _ _ ,__ of BA s CAPE COD COMMISSION O 3225 MAIN STREET V, .. ®.,:;:.... by * P.O. BOX 226 c� BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 `r�ssACIM410 � FAX(508)362-31136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org HEARING NOTICE CAPE COD COMMISSION The Cape Cod Commission("Commission")will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday,August 30,2005 beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the First District Courthouse, Assembly of Delegates Chamber,Route 6A, Barnstable, MA. The following Development of Regional Impact(DRI)has been referred to the Cape Cod Commission under Section 3 of the DRI Enabling Regulations and has also applied under Section 12(k)of the Cape Cod Commission Act,c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended. The project will be considered for a DRI Exemption and a DRI approval. This notice is being published as required by Section 5 of the Cape Cod Act. Project Name: Supply New England Project Applicant: Joseph Keller, c/o Attorney Patrick Butler, Nutter, McClennen & Fish Project Location: 755 Independence Drive/Cobb Trust Property, Hyannis, MA Project Description: Proposed construction of a 26,000 s.f. warehouse including a mezzanine, wholesale showroom and 9,100 s.£ of outdoor storage on a leased portion of a 12.80 acre site in the Industrial Park. Anyone wishing to testify orally will be welcome to do so. Written comments may also be submitted at the hearing, or delivered or mailed to the Cape Cod Commission, P.O.Box 226, 3225 Main Street, Barnstable, MA 02630 for receipt on or before the date of the hearing or until the record is closed. The application,plans and relevant documents may be viewed by calling the Commission office at(508)362-3828,to schedule an appointment between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. If you need a reasonable accommodation, please let us know by August 24, 2005. Please call the Commission for more information and to make a request. B `A� CAPE COD COMMISSION -� r io 7� 3225 MAIN STREET w P.O. BOX 226 'BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 9ss tics (508)362-3828 ACHUS FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org TO: Town of Barnstable Town Clerk, Building-Inspector, Town P anner, Planning Board, Conservation Commission, Board of Health, Board of Appeals, DRI Liaison, and Chief of Police FROM: Gail Hanley, Clerk of the Commission SUBJECT: Supply New England Project—New Tenant- Heritag`e� Builders/A1A Steel ` Modification to the Development of Regional Impact Hardship Exemption Decision DATE: May 4, 2007 Enclosed please find a copy of a modification to theYSupply,-New-Engiarid`Project ') Development of Regional Impact Hardship Exemption Decision that was signed.by the Cape Cod Commission on May 3, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. I! ♦1y >`i W r ICA � OF BA•R't's CAPE COD COMMISSION 3225 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 226 * * BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 �ssACHUs (508)362-3828 FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org DATE: May 3, 2007 TO: Attorney Patrick M. Butler Nutter, McClennen & Fish 1523 lyannough Road P.O. Box 1630 Hyannis, MA 02601-1630 FROM: Cape Cod Commission RE: Review of Proposed New Tenants CO-APPLICANTS: Enoch T. Cobb Trust David Cole, Trustee of Enoch T. Cobb Trust 420 South Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 JDJ Housing Development, LLC c/o The Keller Company, 683C Main Street, Osterville, MA 02655 NEW TENANT: Northern Heritage Builders/A1A Steel 1"35'Barnstable Road;Hyannis; MA-e:026-0 PROJECT#: TR-05009/HDEX-05009 PROJECT: Supply New England, 755 Independence Drive, Hyannis, MA PROPERTY Enoch T. Cobb Trust OWNER: David Cole, Trustee of the Enoch T. Cobb Trust 420 South Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 MAP/PARCEL: 332/10-2 BOOK/PAGE: 4036/119 INTRODUCTION In a Development of.Regional Impact Hardship Exemption (HDEX) decision dated June j 29, 2006, the Cape Cod Commission (Commission) approved, with conditions, the Hardship Exemption application for the Enoch T. Cobb Trust, David Cole, Trustee, and LEA r .2 JDJ Housing Development, LLC, as co-applicants, for a project that involved construction of a new building and outdoor storage space on a 3-acre part of a 12.80- acre parcel in Independence Park in Hyannis. At the time of the Commission's review, JDJ Housing Development, LLC, proposed to lease the three-acre parcel from the Trust, and in turn, sub-lease it to Supply New England, an existing business with stores in Barnstable County which sells/distributes plumbing and heating-related supplies. On February 23, 2007,.Commission staff received from Nutter, McClennen & Fish a Memorandum noting that there was a proposed new sub-lessee and user of the proposed new building, Northern Heritage Builders. The Memo also states that A1A Steel Company, a company affiliated to Northern Heritage Builders, will also use the site. . DETERMINATIO s! The matter of the proposed new sub-lessee was brought before the Regulatory Committee at a regular meeting on March 19, 2007 because condition GC3 of the HDEX decision states in part that "[i]f a sub-tenant other than Supply New England is selected, such selection shall be reviewed by the Commission Regulatory Committee for consistency with this decision." At that meeting, the Committee approved the proposed new tenants as consistent with the HDEX decision, with modifications to the findings and conditions of the HDEX decision as warranted to address the nitrogen loading issues as discussed in the March 19, 2007 meeting. MODIFICATIONS TO THE HDEX DECISION In accordance with the vote of the Regulatory Committee, the following modifications are made to the findings and conditions of the June 29, 2006 HDEX decision: FINDINGS WRF6. Nitrogen loading to groundwater is directly related to on-site wastewater disposal. Use of a standard Title-5 septic system with 379 gallons of Title-5 wastewater design flow is proposed. The project results in a nitrogen-loading concentration of 1.3 ppm if 9.7 ecres. of-the parcel,are.not developed. The portion of the project„parcel not_ subject to lease is not likely to be developed because the associated upland is interspersed with 3.2 acres of wetlands. If actual water-use information is .used for comparable development (FW Webb & Co), the project's estimated Title-5 wastewater flows would be 274 gpd, reducing the nitrogen-loading concentration from 1.3 ppm to 1.0 ppm, consistent with MPS 2.1.1.2.F.2. Alternatively, connection of the project to sewer reduces the project's nitrogen-loading concentration to 0.99 ppm, likewise consistent with the 1-ppm standard. The Commission's Regulatory Committee reviewed the change in sub-tenant from Supply New England to Northern Heritage Builders/A1A Steel and found that this change would increase the wastewater flows and nitrogen loading as follows: Modifications to Supply New England, Barnstable HDEX Decision to Accommodate Northern Heritage Builders/A1A Steel May 3, 2007 i 3 j Northern Nitrogen Loading Conc. (ppm) Heritage Entire parcel Leased area Builders. Wastewater Flows (gallons per day) 12 acres 3.1 acre Treatment (Non-leased (Non-leased alternative area -9 acres area -9 acres undeveloped) developed) Actual 441 1.4 32 Standard Title-5 flows Septic System Title-5 882 2.3 5.1 flows Actual 441 1.1 2.5 Denitrifying Septic flows System Title-5 882 1.8 3.9 flows Sewered T0.4 1.0 Increased wastewater flows resulting from the new proposed tenants may affect the proiect's ability to meet the 1-ppm nitrogen loading limit. As with the previously proposed sub tenant the project can meet the 1-ppm limit if the project is connected to sewer. Alternatively, the proiect would need to provide enhanced dehitirification of wastewater as a condition of this decision if a sewer connection is not permitted. CONDITIONS GC3 JDJ shall obtain all required state and local permits for the proposed proiect. If a sub-tenant other than Supply New England is selected such selection shall be reviewed° by the Commission Regulatory Committee for consistency with this decision. In its meeting on March 19 2007 the Regulatory Committee reviewed the change in tenant from Supply New England to Northern Heritage Builders/A1A Steel and found that this change in sub-tenant was consistent with the Hardship Exemption decision with a modification to Water Resources Finding WRF6 to reflect the revised nitrogen loading, and modifications General Condition GC11 and Water Resources Conditions WRC1 and WRC3 as described below. GC11 An escrow agreement of form and content satisfactory to Commission Counsel and to the Applicant:may be used to secure funding for connection-of the-proiect to Town of Barnstable municipal sewer, or to install Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection-approved (DEP) denitrifying technology to an onsite standard Title-5 septic system as further described in Water Resources Condition WR1. All relevant parties shall sign such escrow agreement and the escrow account shall be-in place with the County Treasurer's department prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance. '-The check for the escrow funds as described in Water.Resources Condition WR1 shall be payable to the Barnstable County Treasurer. This escrow agreement may allow for partial release of funds. Prior to the release of the escrow funds, the work must be Modifications to Supply New England, Barnstable HDEX Decision to Accommodate Northern Heritage Builders/A1A Steel May 3, 2007 `4 .; i i reviewed and approved by Commission staff as completed as required by either this I decision, or the terms of the escrow agreement. WRC1. Prior to the issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance, JDJ and/or the sub-tenant shall provide sixteen thousand five hundred dollars ($16,500) to be held in escrow to be expended for use at the discretion of the Cape Cod Commission's Executive Director for the purpose of connecting the proiect to sewer, or installing a Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection-approved denitrifying components to an on-site septic system in accordance with the following: Prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance, The project JDJ or the sub- tenant shall apply for a sewer connection permit from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and to the town of Barnstable to connect the proiect to town municipal sewer to enable the project to meet the 1-ppm standard set forth in MPS 2.1.1.2.F.2. If the sewer connection.applications are approved, the project shall connect to sewer within twelve'(12) consecutive months of such approvals. in the inteFin Tthe pmpesed-project may use a standard Title-5 septic system as preposed until the project is connected to sewer. If the sewer connection permit is denied, JDJ or the sub-tenant shall install DEP-approved denitrifying components to the on-site septic system within twelve (12) consecutive months of such denial. WRC3. Prior to the release of any Certificate of Compliance, the Operations & Management plan shall be updated by JDJ, and shall be submitted for approval by Commission staff, as noted in Finding WRF9, to ensure that the project meets MPSs 2.1.1.2.A.5 and MPS 2.1.3.6. The revised O&M plan shall reflect the project's grading changes noted in Finding WRF9. At minimum, the plan shall contain the following information and provisions: ■ Identify the party responsible for implementing the plan in accordance with MPS 2.1.3.26; ■ Detailed spill prevention and containment plan to be posted in a conspicuous place within the project building, particularly to address spills in areas that drain to the vegetated swale from the designated fleet-truck storage and parking area, in accordance with MPS 2.1.3.27; ■ Identify best management practices and provide a cumulative account of total suspended solids removal up to a minimum of 80% in accordance with MPS 2.1.3.2; ■ Inspection, monitoring, maintenance schedule; ■ Engineer's stamp certifying that the stormwater system is capable of handling the 25-year. 24-hour storm in accordance with MPS 2.1.3.2; • Detailed spill prevention, response and containment components, in accordance with MPS 2.1.327, which in particular address releases in areas that drain to the vegetated swale from the designated fleet-truck storage and parking area; and ■ Detailed turf-management plan that emphasizes water-conservation measures and minimizes use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides through best-management practices in WHPAs in accordance with MPS 2.1.1.2.A.5. SEE NEXT PAGE FOR SIGNATURE Modifications to Supply New England, Barnstable HDEX Decision to Accommodate Northern Heritage Builders/A1A Steel May 3, 2007 5 7 Frank.Hogan, Regulatory ommittee Chair Ddfe COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Barnstable, ss , 2007 Before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared in his capacity as Chairman of the Cape Cod Commission's.Regulatory Committee, whose name is signed on the preceding document, and such person acknowledged to me that he signed such document voluntarily for its stated purpose. The identity of such person was proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was personal knowledge of the undersigned., Notary Public My Commission Expires: `C)//3 f/ Modifications to Supply New England, Barnstable HDEX Decision to Accommodate Northern Heritage Builders/A1A Steel May 3, 2007 F `F BAR�s CAPE COD COMMISSION y v 3225 MAIN STREET r P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 y3 SS (508)362-3828 SACHv`'� FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org DATE: June 29, 2006 TO: Attorney Patrick M. Butler Nutter, McClennen & Fish 1523 lyannough Road P.O.'Box 1630 Hyannis, MA 02601-1630 FROM: Cape Cod Commission RE: Development of Regional Impact and Hardship Exemption Cape Cod Commission Act, Sections 12, 13 and 23 CO-APPLICANTS: Enoch T. Cobb Trust David Cole, Trustee of Enoch T. Cobb Trust 420 South Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 JDJ Housing Development, LLC �I c/o The Keller Company, 683C Main Street, Osterville, MA 02655 ( j PROJECT.#: TR-05009/HDEX-05009 PROJECT: Supply New England, 755 Independence Drive, Hyannis, MA PROPERTY Enoch T. Cobb Trust OWNER: David Cole, Trustee of the Enoch T. Cobb Trust 420 South Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 MAP/PARCEL: 332/10-2 BOOK/PAGE: 4036/119 DECISION OF THE CAPE COD COMMISSION SUMMARY The Cape Cod Commission (Commission) hereby approves with conditions the application of the Enoch T. Cobb Trust, David Cole, Trustee, and JDJ Housing to 2 Development LLC, (JDJ) co-applicants, and as represented by Attorney Patrick M. Butler, Nutter, McClennen & Fish, as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Hardship Exemption pursuant to Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act (Act), c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended, for the proposed Supply New England project. This decision is rendered pursuant to a vote of the Commission on June 29, 2006. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project, as described on the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) referral form, is to construct a new 26,132 square foot warehouse/showroom building (with a 21,120 square foot footprint).and 3,800 square feet of outdoor storage space on a leased site in Hyannis. It also encompasses 42,440 square feet of pavement for parking and vehicle access. JDJ Housing Development, LLC, proposes to lease just over three (3) acres of a 12.80 acre parcel in Independence Park, which is owned by the Enoch T. Cobb Trust, David Cole, Trustee. The 3-acre site will then be sub-leased to Supply New England (formerly R.B. Corcoran Company), an existing business with stores in Barnstable County which sells/distributes plumbing and heating-related supplies. These include hard goods (pipe, fittings, faucets, towel bars, sinks, shower stalls, etc.) and chemicals (including clog removers, cleaners, and pipe cements). Taking the latest site plan revision (Proposed Grading & Landscape Plan and Proposed Utilities Plan, Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive., Barnstable'MA — latest revision date 9/16/05, with green/orange color offsets, by DownCape Engineering Inc.) into account, the project consists of a building with a 21,120 square foot footprint, including 5,016 square feet of display area and 3,800 square feet of outdoor storage and parking spaces. Revised plans received on September 21, 2005 reflect a reduced paved area; the size of which is not quantified on these plans. The project site locus (Site), as shown on plans entitled Existing Conditions Plan of the Site Development Plans for SUPPLY NEW ENGLAND #755 Independence Drive, Barnstable, MA (dated 1/12/05; revised 06/10/05) is 12.80 acres of land in Hyannis, MA, within Independence Park. The proposed project area is 3 leased acres of the. Site. The Site is currently vacant, partially wooded with wetland areas, is located within a Significant Natural Resource Area that has been mapped for rare- species habitat, unfragmented forest, and a potential public water supply area, and is zoned Industrial/Limited. It is also located in a Growth Activity Center according to the Commission-certified Barnstable Local Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project area and remaining portions of the project Site are traversed by a utility easement. PROCEDURAL HISTORY The Barnstable Town Manager referred this project to the Cape Cod Commission as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) on August 9, 2005. The Commission received the referral form on August 10, 2005. The application was deemed complete on August 11, 2005. A duly noticed public hearing was held on August 30, 2005 at 7:00 pm at the Assembly of Delegates Chamber, First District Courthouse, in Barnstable, MA. The public hearing was continued to September 12, 2005 at 12:30 PM at the Cape Cod Commission office in Barnstable, MA. The Subcommittee. voted Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 i 3 unanimously at this meeting to recommend to the full Commission to deny the DRI Exemption. The Applicant requested at this continued public hearing that it be allowed to submit additional information for reconsideration by the Subcommittee. On September 16, 2005, the Commission received a Memorandum and revised site plans from Nutter, McClennen and Fish. The Subcommittee held a meeting on September 21, 2005 at 9:30 am at the Commission's office in Barnstable Village, MA. The materials submitted by the Applicant to the Commission on September 16, 2005 were reviewed by the Subcommittee at the meeting on September 21, 2005. After hearing the Applicant's request for reconsideration, and. reviewing the newly submitted information the Subcommittee decided not to reconsider its unanimous vote to deny the exemption request and agreed to let the denial vote stand. The public hearing on the DRI exemption was continued to September 22, 2005 at the Commission's office where it was closed by a hearing officer of the Commission, with the record kept open. The public hearing on the DRI was continued to 10:00 am on October 11, 2005 at the Commission's office. The vote of the full Commission on September 29, 2005 was to deny the DRI exemption. On November 11, 2005, the co-applicants submitted a Hardship Exemption/Project of Community Benefit (POCB) request. The application was amended to include both JDJ Housing Development, LLC and the Enoch T. Cobb Trust as co-applicants. The co-applicants, through Nutter, McClennen, and Fish, applied to the Commission for consideration of the project as a Hardship Exemption/POCB pursuant to Section 8 of the Enabling Regulations. On March 16, 2006, the Hardship Exemption application was deemed complete. Based on the amended application, the project is now under consideration for a Hardship Exemption/POCB application, or, in the alternative, a DRI. The Commission and the co-applicants entered into an extension agreement to extend the decision period on the DRI application to the close of business on May 1, 2006. On March 22, 2006, a public hearing was held by a Subcommittee for consideration of the Hardship Exemption request. On March 23, 2006, the Commission and the co-applicants entered into an.extension agreement to extend the decision period on the DRI application to the close of business on. June 29, 2006. On June 1, 2006, the Subcommittee held a meeting to discuss the Hardship Exemption request. The Subcommittee discussed these issues with the staff and voted to recommend approval of the Hardship Exemption to the full Commission based .on a finding being included in the draft decision that the Subcommittee found that the remainder of.the.parcel would undergo DRI review, if a development was proposed, and it is unlikely that the rear portion of the site will be developed given the resource and site constraints. The Subcommittee also voted to hold a meeting on June 12, 2006 to review a draft written decision. At the meeting on June 12, 2006, the Subcommittee reviewed a draft written decision. They also voted to hold a meeting on . June 15, 2006. At the meeting on June 15, 2006, the Subcommittee reviewed a draft written decision. They also voted to recommend approval of the project to the full Commission as.a Hardship Exemption. The Subcommittee also voted to extend the time frame for a decision by the Commission until July 28, 2006. On June 15, 2006, the Commission and the co-applicants entered into an extension agreement to Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 4 extend the decision period on the DRI application to the close of business on July 28, . 2006. Materials Submitted for the Record From the Co-Applicants and Consultants DRI exemption application and attachments 4/12/05 Letter, Attorney Butler and Cox, DRI exemption cover 4/12/05 Copy of a check for$9,000 4/12/05 Letter, Attorney Cox, additional application materials 4/15/05 Commission Application cover sheet for a DRI exemption 4/15/05 - E-mail, from Dan Ojala, site design.issues 4/18/05 Letter., Attorney Cox, abutters list and copy of MHC green card 4/20/05 Letter, Attorney Butler& Cox, letter of intent- Cobb Trust/JDJ 4/29/05 Memo, Attorney Butler, additional application materials 6/15/05 Memo, Attorney Butler, revised site plans 6/15/05 Memo, Attorney Butler, information on economic development 6/20/05 Memo, Attorney Butler, additional application materials 6/20/05 E-mail, Attorney Cox, scheduling of hearing 6/22/05 E-mail, Attorney.Cox, scheduling of hearing 6/22/05 Memo, Attorney Butler, transportation information 7/11/05 Fax, Attorney Butler, letter from Cobb Trust, sale of CR 7/13/05 Letter, Attorney Butler, scheduling of hearing 8/3/05 E-mail, Attorney Cox, scheduling of hearing 8/10/05 Memo, Attorney Butler and Cox, revised landscape plan, Stephen Stimson 8/19/05 Memo, Attorney Cox, copies of applicant's materials for public hearing . 8/22/05 Memo, Attorney Cox, revised floor plan and elevation drawings 8/23/05 Color photographs of interior/exterior of store in Hyannis 8/30/05 White sheet, Attorney Butler, water resources information 8/30/05 Yellow sheet, Attorney Butler, comparison with other projects 8/30/05 Green sheet, Attorney Butler, discussion of exemption 8/30/05 E-mail, Dan Ojala to Attorney Butler and Cox, revised plans/drawings 9/7/05 Memo, Attorney Cox, revised plans/drawings from Dan Ojala as E-mailed 9/7/05 Copy of part of Change of Use decision, Attorney Butler 9/12/05 Memo, Attorney Butler, revised project information 9/16/05 E-mail, Attorney Butler, Memo from Trustee of Cobb Trust 9/20/05 Memo, to Cobb Trust from Attorney Butler, discussion on sale of CR 9/21/05 E-mail, Attorney Cox, request to fax Memo to Cobb Trust Trustee, copying sets of . materials, question on number of copies needed for the mailing 9/22/05 Memo, Attorney Cox, with copies of materials for full Commission 9/22/05 Colored sheets of paper-green and pink-from Attorney Butler, points made in presentation at the full Commission meeting (received at the meeting) 9/29/05 Materials from a three-ring binder, from Attorney Butler, additional materials presented at the full Commission meeting 9/29/05 Sketch Plan, by DownCape Engineering, dated 9/12/05 9/29/05 Fax, Attorney Cox, Memo from Horsley Witten Group 9/29/05 Copy, Memo from Horsley Witten Group 9/30/05 Letter from Attorney Butler to John Lipman 9/30/05 Fax, Attorney Butler, continue hearing of 10/11/05 10/2/05 Notice of Appeal between JDJ Housing Development, LLC vs. Cape Cod Commission 11/4/05 Letter from Attorney Butler to Dorr Fox 11/11/05 Memo from Attorney Butler to Andrea Adams 11/28/05 Supply New England - HDEX Decision - 6/29/06 1 5 Memo from Attorney Butler to Dorr Fox and Andrea Adams 11/30/05 Memo from Attorney Butler to Andrea Adams, Dorr Fox, Attorney Wielgus, Hardship Exemption Application - 1/27/06 E-Mail from Attorney Butler to Andrea Adams, Rectrix & Supply New England 2/27/06 Memo from Attorney Butler to Andrea Adams 2/28/06 Memo from Attorney Butler to Andrea Adams 3/10/06 Proposed Floor Plans (Al.1, A2.1, and A2.2), NDA Architects 3/13/06 Memo from Attorney Butler to Andrea Adams 3/14/06 MESA Project Review, dated February 1, 2006 . 3/15/06 Memo from Attorney Butler to Andrea Adams, hearing 3/15/06 Memo from Attorney Butler to Andrea Adams and Attorney Wielgus 3/15/06 Letter from Attorney Butler to Andrea Adams, fee waiver request 3/27/06 Colored parcel maps of Israel Pond and Rose Motel parcels 5/4/06 Memo from Attorney Butler, outline of points discussed w/Town 5/17/06 Memo from Attorney Butler, follow-up to meeting 5/25/06 Fax from Attorney Butler, to Jon Witten, proposed language GF9 6/12/06 Aerial-plan from Attorney Butler, Israel Pond (?)4 6/l/06 Fee waiver request form, from Attorney Butler 6/20/06 Concept ANR plan, from Attorney Butler 6/22/06 Copy, application cover, stamped by Town Departments Various From the Commission Letter, to Attorney Butler, DRI exemption application not complete 4/13/05 E-mail, to Dan Ojala, from Scott Michaud, water resources issues 4/15/05 Staff Routing form 4/21./05 E-mail, to Attorney Cox, application materials 6/22/05 Memo to staff with application materials 6/23/05 Letter, to Attorney Butler and Cox, scheduling of hearing 8/2/05 E-mail, to Commission staff, scheduling of hearing 8/8/05 E-mail, to and from Susan Kadar, project description, hearing date 8/10/05 Fax cover sheet, to Attorney Cox, DRI referral form 8/10/05 E-mail, to Robin Giangregorio, receipt of DRI referral form 8/10/05 Fax cover sheet, to Attorney Butler, letter 8/11/05 Letter, to Attorney Butler, DRI referral received and application complete 8/11/05 Fax cover sheet, to Joan Pierce, Massachusetts Department of Fish and Wildlife, copy of Project Summary from applicant 8/18/05 Memo, to Subcommittee, site visit, hearing location and time 8/22/05 Staff report 8/24/05 Fax cover sheet, to Attorney Cox, Robin Giangregorio, and Ed Maroney, copy of staff report and date for hearing 8/24/05 E-mail, to Tom Broadrick, Director of Planning, copy of staff report, site visit date and time, and date and time for hearing 8/24/05 Locus map (aerial photo) for site visit 8/29/05 E-mail, to Attorney Cox, no written comments on project from public or others as of morning of August 30, 200.5 8/30/05 Hearing Notice 8/30/05 Minutes 8/30/05 E-mail, to Attorney Butler and Cox, Town staff, Subcommittee update, Minutes 9/9/05 Fax cover sheet, to APCC, copy of staff report 9/6/05 E-mail, to staff,_revised plans received from applicant 9/7/05 E-mail, to Sharon Rooney and Sarah Korjeff, revised building elevations 9/7/05 E-mail, to staff, revised plans received from applicant 9/8/05 E-mail, to Subcommittee, draft Minutes, Subcommittee Update, other info. 9/8/05 Supply New England - HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 6 E-mail, transmission error message 9/8/05 E-mail, to Roslyn Garfield, draft Minutes, Subcommittee Update, other info. 9/8/05 E-mail, to John Harris, draft Minutes, Subcommittee Update, other info. . 9/8/05 .Subcommittee update 9/8/05 E-mail, to Scott Michaud, request for copies of information for file 9/8/05 Outline of steps for the Subcommittee Chair 9/12/05 E-mail, from Susan Kadar, concerns about project 9/12/05 Hearing Notice 9/12/05 Sign In Sheet 9/12/05 Minutes 9/12/05 E-mail, to Ed Maroney, copy of Project Update 9/14/05 . E-mail, to Subcommittee and staff, meeting on September 21, 2.005 9/16/05 E-mail, to Subcommittee, applicant and Town Director of Planning, meeting on September 21, 2005 and copies of Commission materials 9/20/05 Subcommittee update 9/20/05 Fax cover sheet, to Attorney Butler 9/20/05 Meeting Notice 9/21/05 Hearing Notice 9/22/05 Memo, to Commission Members, including Subcommittee Members,.copy of draft decision and other materials for consideration Commission meeting 9/22/05 Fax cover sheet, to Roslyn Garfield, copy of revised draft decision 9/22/05 Fax confirmation sheet, to Attorney Cox, Memo to Cobb Trust 9/22/05 Fax cover sheet, confirmation sheet, to Attorney Butler and Town Director of Planning, copy of draft decision as approved by Subcommittee Chair 9/23/05 Draft decision for full Commission hearing, distributed at 9/21/05 meeting 9/29/05 Hearing Notice for hearing before full Commission 9/29/05 Memo, to Commission Chair and Subcommittee Chair, outline of anticipated steps as part of the hearing before the full Commission 9/29/05 E-mail, to Commission staff, next steps in project review 10/4/05 Letter from Attorney Wielgus to Attorney Butler 10/7/05 Hearing Notice 10/11/05 Minutes, Hearing Officer 10/11/05 Memo from Andrea Adams to Subcommittee 11/14/05 Hearing Notice 11/17/05 Minutes, Hearing Officer 11/17/05 Letter from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler 11/22/05 Letter from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler 11/23/05 Extension Agreement 11/23/05 Letter from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler 12/13/05 Letter from Attorney Wielgus to Attorney Butler 12/14/05 Memo, from Andrea Adams to Commission staff 12/14/05 Letter from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler 1/12/06 Letter from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler 1/12/06 Letter from Dorr Fox to Attorney Butler dated 1/17/06 Letter from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler 2/17/06 E-Mail from Andrea Adams to Commission staff members and Subcommittee members about public hearing 2/22/06 E-Mail from Andrea Adams to Commission staff members and Subcommittee members about public hearing 2/22/06 E-maid from Andrea Adams to Commission staff members and Subcommittee members about project information 2/22/06 Letter from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler 2/23/06 Fax from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler 2/27/06 Memo from Andrea Adams to Tim Boesch 3/2/06 Supply New England - HDEX Decision - 6/29/06 7 E-Mail from Sarah Korjeff to Andrea Adams 3/3/06 E-Mail,from Andrea Adams to Subcommittee 3/7/06 E-Mail from Andrea Adams to Commission staff 3/7/06 Minutes, Hearing Officerl 3/13/06 Staff report 3/16/06 E-Mail from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler, staff report 3/16//06 Letter from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler 3/16/06 E-Mail from Andrea Adams to Subcommittee, E-mail from Attorney Butler 3/20/06 Memo from Andrea Adams to Subcommittee, hearing 3/22/06 Sign—in sheet, hearing 3/22/06 E-Mail from Andrea Adams to Attorney Butler, extension fee 3/23/06 Extension.Agreement 3/23/06 Agenda of Executive Committee 4/3/06 E-Mail from Sarah Korjeff to Andrea Adams and Sharon Rooney, design issues4/7/06 Memo to Commission Members from Andrea Adams, key.motions 4/20/06 Staff report 5/24/06 Hearing Notice 6/1/06 Hearing Attendance Sheet 6/1/06 Minutes 6/1/06 Fax cover sheet, draft decision to Attorney Butler 6/8/06 Fax cover sheet, to Patty Daley, Town, draft decision 6/9/06 Fax cover sheet, to Tom Broadrick, Town, draft decision 6/9/06 Meeting Notice 6/12/06 Minutes 6/12/06 E-mail, to Subcommittee, revised draft decision and minutes 6/12/06 E-mail, to Commission members, draft decision and other materials 6/12/06 E-mail, to Attorney Butler, revised draft decision. 6/12/06 E-mail; to Daley and Broadrick, Town, revised draft decision 6/13/06 E-mail, to Subcommittee, meeting on 6/15/06 6/141/06 Meeting Notice 6/15/06 Minutes 6/15/06 Extension Agreement 6/15/06 Fax cover sheet, to Attorney Butler, revised draft decision 6/20/06 Memo to Subcommittee, about September 21, 2005 meeting Undated Memo to Subcommittee, information for 6/1/06 hearing Undated Memo to Subcommittee, information for 6/12/06 meeting Undated From Federal, State or Local Officials Fax, DRI referral form, from Town of Barnstable 8/10/05 Letter, from APCC, expresses concerns about the project 9/20/05 E-mail, from Patty Daley, Town of Barnstable, project issues 5/18/06 From the Public No written comments received Supply New England — HDEX Decision 6/29/06 r The application and notices of public hearings relative thereto, the Commission staffs notes, exhibits and correspondence, the transcript and minutes of meetings and hearings and all written submissions received in the course of the Commission's proceedings are incorporated into the record by reference. TESTIMONY Public Hearing Below is a summary of the Public Hearings. Please see the record for the full Minutes, and Minutes of any Subcommittee meetings. At the March 22, 2006 Public Hearing, Attorney Patrick Butler presented the project and outlined the applicant's application for a Hardship Exemption. Commission Counsel, Attorney Jessica Wielgus presented the Commission staff report. Joseph Keller offered comments and Richard Andres requested clarity regarding the applicants and their relationship to the adjoining project. The Subcommittee discussed open spacb, natural resources and transportation issues. At the June 1, 2006 Public Hearing, Mr. Butler presented an alternative proposal for open space and transportation with the intent of obtaining an approval for the hardship exemption. The Subcommittee discussed these issues with the staff and decided to recommend approval of the Hardship Exemption to the full Commission since the remainder of the parcel would undergo DRI review, if a development was proposed, and it is unlikely that the rear portion of the site will be developed given the resource and site constraints. JURISDICTION The proposed project qualifies as a Development of Regional Impact under Section 3(e) of the Enabling Regulations as amended, as "new construction of any building or buildings...with a Gross Floor Area greater than 10,000 square feet...". FINDINGS The Commission has considered the application of the co-applicants, the Enoch T. Cobb Trust and JDJ Housing Development, LLC for the Supply New England project, and based on consideration of such application and upon the information presented at the public hearing(s) and submitted for the record, makes the following findings pursuant to Sections 12, 13 and 23 of the Act: General GF1. The proposed project qualifies as a Development of Regional Impact because it is new construction of a building with a Gross Floor Area greater than 10,000 square feet. GF2. The most recent site plans (dated 9/16/06) indicate the proposed building consists of 21,120 square feet of plumbing supply warehouse and 5,280 square feet consisting of ancillary retail, wholesale, and.showroom space. Based on these Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 9 plans, the project.will also include 3,800 square feet of ancillary outdoor storage and 41 parking spaces. As noted in Finding CCF3 and Condition CCC2, any inconsistencies between the site plan and interior floor plans must be resolved prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance by the Commission. GF3. This project was reviewed subject to the 2002 (revised) Regional Policy Plan. GF4. The Town of Barnstable has a Cape Cod Commission certified Local Comprehensive Plan (LCP). GF5. The proposed project will require an Order of Conditions from the Barnstable Conservation Commission, and Barnstable Site Plan review. GF6. At a public hearing June 1, 2006, a Commission Subcommittee determined the proposed project was eligible for consideration of a Hardship Exemption. GF7. The Commission finds that the Enoch T. Cobb Trust, a co-applicant, has a financial hardship in. meeting some of the requirements of the Regional Policy Plan. This is based in part on the Enoch T. Cobb Trust's unique financial situation, in that its primary source of funding is though the lease or sale of land holdings,_ and that its sole mission is to benefit the school children of the town of Barnstable. The Commission finds that for Minimum Performance Standards (MPS) 2.1.1.2.F, 2.3.1.2, 2.5.1.3, 4.1.1.2, 4.1.2.1, 4.1.3.4, 4.1.3.7, and 6.2.5, the Enoch T. Cobb Trust has demonstrated that a hardship exists, and that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Cape Cod Commission Act (Act) would involve substantial hardship. The Commission also finds that desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, and without substantially derogating from the purposes of the Act. GF8. Subsequent to the recording of this decision, any further development on or within the 12.8 acre project site locus (Site), including but not limited to the re-division or subdivision of the Site, would be a modification of this decision and, accordingly, reviewed pursuant to the Cape Cod Commission Act. GF9. The Enoch T. Cobb Trust may, in accordance with this decision, prepare, file, obtain endorsement upon, and record an Approval Not Required (ANR) Subdivision Plan creating two lots, one of which shall consist of the project area/leased premises as shown on the plan entitled Site Layout Plan of the Site Development Plans for SUPPLY NEW ENGLAND #755 Independence Drive, Barnstable, MA (dated 1/12/05; revised 9/7/05), and the second of which shall consist of the remaining portion of the Site. The lots shall be created to conform with the provisions of Section 240-33(E) of the Barnstable Zoning Ordinances. The ANR Plan shall contain a notation that the lots created shall be subject to the terms and provisions of this Development of 1 P Regional Impact Hardship Exemption decision. Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 10 Natural Resources/Open Space NRF1. The entire 12.8 acre project site locus is mapped Priority Habitat in the 11"' Edition of the Natural Heritage Atlas. The Site is also mapped as a potential public water supply area and portions are mapped unfragmented forest according to the RPP significant natural resource areas map. Portions of the Site are located within a land area known as the Hyannis Coastal Plain Ponds Complex, a collection of coastal plain ponds which provide habitat for globally rare species. NRF2. The applicants did not provide a complete natural resources inventory of the Site as required by MPS 2.4.1.1, but they did provide a preliminary review of natural conditions on the Site by a biologist with the Horsley Witten Group. The biologist identified three distinct wetland types on the Site, including coastal plain pondshore, isolated shrub-dominant wet basin depressions, and wet meadow/scrub-shrub wetlands. According to project plans, 3.2 acres of the Site are wetland, the remaining 9.6 acres are upland. The 3 acre project area does not contain wetlands, though portions of a buffer to an isolated shrub-scrub-wetland are located within the project area. Portions of a utility easement run through the Site from north to south. NRF3. The Site is mapped priority habitat for rare species. The RPP requires that DRIs not adversely impact rare species or their habitats. The Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP) has provided comments on the project, dated March 3, 2006, stating that "this project, as currently proposed, will not result in a prohibited "take" of state listed species." The letter goes on to state "to ensure that no alteration occurs beyond the "Work Limit Line" as shown on the plan dated 9/16/05 and that future activities are compatible with state-listed species and their habitat documented in the immediate vicinity of the subject property, we strongly encourage that the remaining portion(s) of the property be placed under long-term habitat protection." NRF4. The Commission finds that based on the location of wetlands arid upland on the Site, the location of the utility easement, the access constraints; and the comments from the NHESP, that it is unlikely that the remaining 9.7 acres of the Site may be developed. NRF5. The proposed building and parking area were located within the 100 foot buffer to a wetland on-Site, but have been moved out of this area. Disturbance and construction of a retaining wall will occur within the last 20.feet of the 100 foot wetland buffer, which is inconsistent with MPS 2.3.1.2. The applicant has made efforts through the'DRI review process to minimize the impact to the wetland buffer by removing the building footprint from this area. Consequently, given the Site constraints and project requirements, the proposed alteration is unavoidable and has been minimized. The Commission finds it appropriate to grant relief from the wetland buffer requirements through the hardship exemption. NRF6. The location of the project at the front of the Site, adjacent to the road and in a previously disturbed area, and away from the more sensitive resources at the back of Supply New England — HDEX Decision - 6/29/06 11 the Site, complies with several MPSs in the RPP, including MPS 2.4.1.1 which requires that site layout minimizes.impacts to wildlife and plant habitat, MPS 2.4.1.2 and alteration of requires minimizing the clearing of natural vegetation which eq g g topography, MPS 2.4.1.3, which requires minimizing the fragmentation of wildlife and plant habitat, MPS 2.4.1.4 which prohibits projects which would adversely impact rare species or their habitat, and MPS 2.5.1.1 which requires clustering development away from sensitive resources. NRF7. NHESP also stated in their letter dated March 3, 2006 that destructive off-road vehicle use is'known to occur in the area, and that the property owner should take steps to control off-road vehicle access. NRF8. The development area is approximately 3 acres for the project. Since the project is located in a significant natural resource area, .the open space requirement (MPS 2.5.1.3) is twice the development area, or a total of 6"acres of open space. NRF9. The Commission's preferred location for the open space for this project is on the project Site, given the sensitivity of the resources present. However, the applicant has maintained that the charitable nature of the Cobb Trust, and its fiduciary responsibilities to maximize the returns on its property, pose a hardship in meeting the open space requirements. The Cobb Trust has represented their intention to protect the rear portion of the Site for conservation purposes, but wishes to sell a conservation restriction or the fee in the land. The Town of Barnstable has indicated their interest in purchasing the remaining 9.7 acres of the Site, and has been a party to several discussions between staff and the applicant toward that effort. Consequently, the Commission finds that the Enoch T. Cobb Trust, co-applicant, has demonstrated a hardship in meeting the open space requirements, and that.the relief granted is the.minimum relief necessary, and that granting such relief will not nullify or substantially derogate from the purposes of.the Act. NRF10. JDJ has proposed to permanently protect 2.5 acres of upland located on two lots identified on Barnstable Town Assessor's maps as map 332/parcel 005 and map 253/parcel 019/parcel extension T00. These two parcels are both located adjacent to ponds, one to Israel pond within the Hyannis Coastal Plain Ponds Complex, and the other Shallow Pond located south of Route 132, and are both mapped priority habitat for rare species. Both parcels are also located adjacent to previously protected open space. The Israel Pond parcel is pristine, and will be an excellent addition to the permanently protected land in the area, though the exact acreage of this parcel is still in question. The Shallow Pond parcel contains an existing boarding house, and portions of the site have been disturbed with land clearing, brushing, and considerable dumping. The natural resource values of this parcel are less than the onsite parcel's, but its habitat value can be restored through cleanup and revegetation. Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 12 NRF11. The protection of the pondshore and wetland buffers to these two ponds may be considered mitigation for the small area of disturbance within the 100 foot buffer on the project Site (see Finding NRF5). NRF12. Invasive species management is an interest of the Commission, MPS 2.4.1.6. Given the highly sensitive nature of the Site, the applicant should make every effort to avoid the introduction of invasive species to the Site. Water Resources WRF1. Impacts to water resources consist of the project's nitrogen load to groundwater from the project's standard Title-5 septic system, and nitrogen and other contaminants associated with stormwater runoff from.42,440 square feet'of the 3.1- acre portion of the Site to be paved. WRF2. Groundwater flowing beneath the Site is located in contributing areas to existing and potential public water supplies and contributing areas to the Lewis Bay estuarine system. WRF3. Projects in-Potential Public Water Supply Areas (PPWSAs) are limited by MPS 2.1.1.2.F.2 to a parcel-wide nitrogen-loading concentration of 1 ppm. All other standards applicable to Wellhead Protection Areas pursuant to MPS 2.1.1.2.A also apply.to PPWSAs. WRF4. The project's nitrogen loading concentration may exceed 1 ppm if— • In accordance with MPS 2.1.1.21, supporting information demonstrates that the PPWSA will not be used as a potential water supply; or • Relief is granted to the project from having to meet MPS 2.1.1.21 through a Hardship Exemption. In the absence of supporting information demonstrating that this property is not required as a potential public water supply, and given physical constraints of the Site described in NRF4 and WRF6, and the fiduciary constraints of the Cobb Trust which prevent the Trust from permanently protecting the rear 9.7 acres of the Site through this DRI decision, the Commission finds it appropriate to grant relief from MPS 2.1.1.2.E and that the relief granted is the minimum relief necessary, and that granting such relief will not nullify or substantially derogate from the purposes of the Act. WRF5. Projects in Wellhead Protection Areas are limited by MPS 2.1.1.2.A.1 to a parcel-wide nitrogen-loading concentration of 5 ppm and required by MPS 2.1.1.2.A.5 to adopt a turf-management plan that incorporates best-management practices. WRF6. Nitrogen loading to groundwater is directly related to on-site wastewater disposal. Use of a standard Title-5 septic system with 379 gallons of Title-5 wastewater design flow is proposed. The project results in a nitrogen-loading concentration of 1.3 ppm if 9.7 acres of the parcel are not developed. The portion of the project parcel not subject to lease is not likely to be developed because the associated upland is interspersed with 3.2 acres of wetlands. If actual water-use Supply New England HDEX Decision — 6/29106 f 13 information is used for comparable development (FW Webb & Co), the project's estimated Title-5 wastewater flows would be 274 gpd, reducing the nitrogen-loading concentration from 1.3 ppm to 1.0 ppm, consistent with MPS 2.1.1.2.F.2. Alternatively, connection of the project to sewer reduces the project's nitrogen-loading concentration to 0.99 ppm, likewise consistent with the 1-ppm standard. WRF7. JDJ Housing Development, LLC, a co-applicant, has agreed to apply to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and to the town of Barnstable for a municipal sewer connection for this project. WRF8. The project is required to meet MPS 2.1.3.3 and MPS 2.1.3.2 which respectively require use of vegetation to treat runoff and consistency with Massachusetts Stormwater Policy Guidelines. The guidelines prescribe use of catch basins in conjunction with pre-treatment in critical areas such as Wellhead Protection Areas, and also prescribe spill control in areas with higher potential pollutant loads such as fleet-truck storage. Project stormwater will be managed largely through use of catch basins and subsurface leach pits. Project plans currently include a mechanical shutoff (gate valve) at the loading dock trench drain, in compliance with MPS 2.1.3.7. Project plans revised and submitted on September 7, 2005 show removal of a proposed stormwater infiltration basin from the. 100-foot wetland buffer and incorporation of a vegetated swale in the parking island. The swale will treat runoff from approximately 1/6"' of the proposed impervious pavement. The project's Operations and Management (O&M) plan will need to be updated to reflect the September 7, 2005 changes and should incorporate information and provisions identified in Condition WRC3. Hazardous Materials/Wastes HMWF1. The Site is located in a Wellhead Protection Area, so MPS 4.3.1.3 applies to this project which limits the amount of hazardous materials and wastes to a "household quantity"as defined by the RPP. A May 27, 2005 Commission staff site visit to their Hyannis store indicated that Supply New England had at least 50 gallons of hazardous materials on hand, which is an amount in excess of the limit set by the Regional Policy Plan. HMWF2. MPS 4.3.1.1 requires DRIs to make "reasonable efforts to minimize their hazardous material use and/or waste generation through source reduction, reuse, material substitution, employee education, and recycling." As noted in HWMF1, the company sells an array of hazardous materials targeted to the plumbing/heating industry. To address MPS.4.3.1.1, the company could institute a program of actively seeking the least-toxic products to sell. HMWF3. MPS 4.3.1.2 requires "compliance with Massachusetts Hazardous Waste Regulations, 310 CMR 30.000." In addition to the hazardous materials offered for sale, the company also generates some wastes regulated by 310 CMR 30.000, Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 14 including used fluorescent bulbs. HMWF4. MPS 4.3.1.4 requires that DRIs `prepare an emergency response plan that identifies potential threats to employee safety and health and threats of environmental releases." The company currently handles, stores and sells a variety of hazardous materials. Economic Development EDF1. JDJ has provided sufficient economic data, as prescribed in technical bulletin 04-002, to comply with MPS 3.1.1. Overall, the impacts of this project on the regional economy will be neutral given that Supply New England is an existing business already located in Barnstable. This project may, according to the co-applicants, result in the addition of two full-time positions. Currently, Supply New England employs 16 full-time people with benefits. As a wholesale/retail business, this project will be appropriately located in an industrial zone.. While this project will not add. diversity to. the regional economy, it does serve an important sector of the economy and its retention in the area will maintain current levels of competition. Community Character Building Design CCF1. The latest submittals included elevation drawings for all four facades of the building, dated 8/4/05. These elevations indicate the general building materials but do not indicate proposed colors. The applicants also submitted samples of the proposed exterior masonry blocks and product information about the proposed exterior metal panels, but did not indicate their color choices in either case. CCF2. Given the non-traditional materials proposed, the size of the building mass (in excess of 15,000 square feet), and limited screening, natural or neutral color tones should be used on both the metal wall panels and the metal roof. As with all metal exterior materials, a matte finish is also appropriate to limit reflectivity. CCF3. The most recent interior floor plan (received by the Commission on March 14, 2006) does not match the most recent site plan (received on September 21, 2005). The interior floor plan has four straight sides, while the site plan shows a building with one wall articulated in such a way as to reduce encroachment into the wetland buffer. This inconsistency is required to be addressed at the time of the Preliminary Certificate of Compliance. Site Design/Landscaping CCF4. MPS 6.2.5 states that for all new development, no individual structure shall exceed a footprint of 15,000 square feet unless it is fully screened or located in a Growth Incentive Zone (GIZ). Full screening may be achieved through the use of traditionally scaled frontage buildings or a vegetated buffer at least 200 feet in depth. The proposed development has a footprint of 21,120 square feet, and a GIZ does not Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 i 15 encompass the proposed project. Therefore, the project must be fully screened. Due . to site constraints,.including an existing wetland to the south, full compliance with MPS 6.2.5 would render the site unbuildable and would therefore constitute a . substantial hardship. JDJ submitted a revised landscape plan prepared by Stephen Stimpson Associates dated August 19, 2005 that provides'a 50 ft wooded buffer with a mixture of evergreen and deciduous tress and shrubs to screen the proposed building from Independence Park Drive. Granting partial relief from MPS 6.2.5 will not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent and purposes of the Act nor result in a substantial detriment to the public good. CCF5. MPS 6.2.6 allows the use of nontraditional materials and forms in industrial parks or areas not visible from scenic or regional roadways provided the project maintains adequate buffers to ensure that the proposed development will not be visible from scenic.or regional roadways. The proposed project is located within Independence Park, an existing industrial park in the town of Barnstable. Therefore, application of MPS 6.2.6 is appropriate for this project. As.noted above, the applicant proposes to maintain a 50ft wooded buffer along Independence Park Drive to screen the proposed development from this roadway. Curb cuts have been consolidated into one entrance/exit on Independence Drive, which allowed for a greater landscaped buffer area along this roadway. The finished grade of the proposed building is also set 14ft below the roadway, which will also help to screen the building. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with MPS 6.2.6. MPS 6.2.9 requires all development to implement a landscape plan that addresses the functional aspects of landscaping, and requires all development to provide a maintenance agreement for all proposed landscaping. Based on a revised landscape plan dated August 19, 2005, the proposed landscape plan is consistent in part with MPS 6.2.9. The applicant has not submitted a draft maintenance agreement for all proposed landscaping for three years, as required by this MPS. CCF6. MPS 6.2.7 requires parking to be located to the side or rear of the buildings. Proposed parking is located to the side of the building, consistent with this MPS. CCF7. MPS 6.2.11 prohibits the installation of internally illuminated signs. No information was submitted concerning proposed signage for the site. Exterior Lighting CCF8. MPS 6.2.10 of the 2002 RPP requires that "development and redevelopment conform with the Cape Cod Commission's exterior lighting design standards and submission requirements, Technical Bulletin 95-001."As of the date of this decision, no information was provided on the proposed project's exterior lighting. Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 16 Transportation Resources TF1. Based on the definition in MPS 4.1.3.1, area regional roadways include Independence Drive, Attucks Way, Kidds Hill Road, Mary Dunn Road, Route 6A, and Route 132. TF2. In compliance with MPS 4.1.1.10, the Commission determined trip generation for the project from the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation manual. Based on classification of 21,120 square feet of the building as warehouse (first floor and mezzanine), 5,280 square feet of the building.as Building Materials and Lumber Supply (retail, wholesale, and showroom area), and 5,500 square feet of outdoor storage as warehousing and utilizing techniques in the ITE manual, the project is estimated to generate 37 new weekday morning peak hour trips, 48 new weekday afternoon peak hour trips, and 397 new weekday daily trips. TF3. MPS 4.1.1.1 requires development to not degrade safety for all users. The proposed project has acceptable driveway sight distances, includes a s.idewalk easement, accommodates all expected users, and generates a moderate amount of traffic not expected to affect area intersection safety and consequently complies with this MPS. TF4. MPS 4.1.1.2 requires all projects to analyze safety and provide for necessary safety mitigation at intersections impacted by 25 or more new peak hour trips. The project is expected to impact Independence Drive at Kidds Hill Road, Attucks Way, and Route 132 at this level. However, the Hardship Exemption has been applied to this standard. The Commission finds, based on the cost to the Enoch T. Cobb Trust of such analysis, and based on sufficient infrastructure and recent improvements for area intersections: • The Enoch T. Cobb Trust, a co-applicant, has met its burden of showing that a hardship exists, • Literal enforcement of the Minimum Performance Standards would be. a hardship for the Enoch T. Cobb Trust, • Relieving the requirements of MPS 4..1.1.2 to not require safety analysis and mitigation of the locations impacted by peak hour traffic is the minimum relief required to alleviate the hardship, and, • The relief does not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent of the Act nor will it result in a detrimental impact to the public good. TF5. MPS 4.1.1.3 requires all developments to meet access.management guidelines for driveway spacing. The proposed driveway is more than 500 feet from the nearest intersections and will be located opposite a driveway for a housing complex. A break will be provided in the median of Independence Drive to allow for full access to the development. Consequently, the project complies with the MPS. Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 17 TF6. MPS 4.1.1.5 requires all human made objects to be placed to minimize obstructions, safety conflicts, and glare including placement of utilities underground where appropriate. The project will be required to comply with this provision and with Commission lighting standards as the project development proceeds. All utilities will be required to be underground. Consequently, the project complies with the MPS. TF7. MPS.4.1.1.6 requires minimization of impacts to adjacent roadways and accommodation of all users. The site plan shows the development driveway and parking spaces are situated such that maneuvers in the parking lot should not affect travel on Independence Drive. All users of the site are expected to arrive by motor vehicle. Some employees may choose to walk or bicycle to the site, but few are expected. MPS 4.1.1.6 also requires provisions for walking and bicycling connections on the property where appropriate. The co-applicants will provide a 10 foot sidewalk right of way at the front of the property, if it is needed. TF8. MPS 4.1.1.7 requires provision of safe driveway sight distances. The co- applicants' engineer .and Commission staff believe sight distances will meet the standards. The co-applicants will be required to have sight distances certified for standards compliance before occupancy. TF9. MPS 4.1.1.9 limits driveway widths to state standards which is 24 feet plus turning radii for this project. The co-applicants will be required to finalize the site plan including meeting this standard and submit the site plan for Commission staff review. TF10. MPS 4.1.2.1 requires all developments to reduce expected daily traffic by 25%. However, a Hardship Exemption has been. applied to this standard. The Commission finds, based on the cost to the Enoch T. Cobb Trust of such mitigation: • The Enoch T. Cobb Trust,a co-applicant has met its burden of showing that a hardship exists, Literal enforcement of the Minimum Performance Standards would be a hardship for the Enoch T. Cobb Trust, • Relieving the requirements of MPS 4.1.2.1 to limit trip reduction mitigation to $5,000 is the minimum relief required to alleviate the hardship, and, • The relief does not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent of the Act nor will it result in a detrimental impact to the public good. TF11. MPS 4.1.2.5 requires accommodation of non-automobile users and creation of safe walking and bicycling links where appropriate. The co-applicants will be relocating an existing utility easement access drive and allow users who have a right to use this access continued use and access to the remaining land behind the development. The development site topography, location., and area development does not lend itself to new pedestrian or bicycle connections, except for a sidewalk easement being provided along Independence Drive. .Therefore, the project complies with MPS 4.1.2.5. Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 18 TF12. MPS 4.1.2.6 requires parking spaces to be limited to the number of spaces required under zoning. The co-applicants will be required to meet this MPS through the Commission site. plan review condition. TF13. MPS 4.1.3.2 requires level of service analysis for all new access to the regional road system and these accesses must operate at level of service C or better. The co- applicants' engineer's analysis and Commission staff analysis has shown the driveways will operate at level of'service C during peak hours. Therefore, the project complies with MPS 4.1.3.2. TF14. MPS 4.1.3.4 requires developments to perform level of service analysis and mitigate peak hour impacts on all regional roadway links and intersections. However, a Hardship Exemption has been applied to this standard. The Commission finds, based on the cost to the Enoch T. Cobb Trust of such mitigation: • The Enoch T. Cobb Trust, a co-applicant, has met its burden of showing that a hardship exists, • Literal enforcement of the Minimum Performance Standards would be a hardship for the Enoch T. Cobb Trust, Relieving the requirements of MPS 4.1.3.4 to limit peak hour impact mitigation to $15,000 is the minimum relief required to alleviate the hardship, and, • The relief does not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent of the Act nor will it result in a detrimental impact to the public good. TF15. MPS 4.1.3.7 prohibits developments if the project is estimated to add new traffic such that within five years of project completion warrants for new road widening or signalization are met in historic districts, on scenic roads, or if such changes impact natural resources or community character. The co-applicants. did not perform an analysis to determine compliance with this MPS. A Hardship Exemption has been applied to this standard. The Commission finds, based on the cost to the Enoch T. Cobb Trust of such analysis, and on the limited impact to such locations due to the project's moderate peak hour trip generation: • The Enoch T. Cobb Trust, as co-applicant has met its burden of showing that a hardship exists, • Literal enforcement of the Minimum Performance Standards would be a . hardship for the Enoch T. Cobb Trust, • Relieving the requirements of MPS 4.1.3.7 to not require the analysis is the minimum relief required to alleviate the hardship, and, • The relief does not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent of the Act nor will it result in a detrimental impact to the public good. CONCLUSION Based on the Findings above, the Cape Cod Commission hereby concludes: Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 19 The Enoch T. Cobb Trust, a co-applicant has demonstrated that literal compliance with the Act and the RPP would involve substantial hardship to it, as noted in Findings GF6, GF7, NRF5, NRF9, WRF4, CCF4, TF4, TF10, TF14, and TF15. Desirable relief may be granted to the applicant without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Act, and the Commission grants the minimum relief necessary to address the hardship. The Commission also concludes that the proposed project is consistent with the 2002 Regional Policy Plan (as revised), with the exception of MPSs 2.1.1.2.17, 2.3.1.2, 2.5.1.3, 4.1.1.2, 4.1.2.1, 4.1.3.4, 4.1.3.7, and 6.2.5. The Commission hereby approves, with conditions, the application of the Enoch T. Cobb Trust and JDJ Housing Development, LLC, as co-applicants, for the proposed Supply New England project as a DRI Hardship Exemption, provided.the following conditions are met: CONDITIONS General GC1. This Hardship Exemption decision is valid for 7 years and local development permits may be issued pursuant hereto for a period of 7 years from the date of this written decision. GC2. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein,and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, and remain in compliance herewith, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this decision. GC3. JDJ shall obtain all state and local permits for the proposed project. If a sub- tenant other than Supply New England is selected, such selection shall be reviewed by the Commission Regulatory Committee for consistency with this decision. GC4. No development work, as the term "development" is defined in the Act, shall be undertaken until all appeal periods have elapsed or, if such an appeal has been filed, until all judicial proceedings have been completed. GCS. JDJ shall forward to the Commission, forthwith, copies of any and all permits and approvals issued in relation to the project which are issued subsequent to this decision. A copy of final plans approved by the town of Barnstable, including the Conservation Commission or other state or local agencies shall be submitted to the Cape Cod Commission upon receipt of local approvals. GC6. If the final plans approved by local boards are inconsistent with this decision and/or supporting information, then they shall be reviewed by Commission staff to determine consistency with the Commission's Enabling Regulations in effect at the time to determine whether the change in the final plans is a modification to the approved project. If the Commission staff determines that the final plans require a modification, the co-applicants shall also as necessary seek a modification to this Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 20 decision in accordance with the Commission's Enabling Regulations in effect at the time the modification is sought. GC7. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, or any development accf ity on the site (as the term development is defined=in the Commission-Act) JDJ shall obtain a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance from the Commission stating that the conditions in this decision that are required to be satisfied before issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance have been met. GC8�"Pnor to issuance of a Certificate of-Oge/Occupancy;JDJ-shall-obtain a Final Certificate of Compliance fromthe Commissionystatin-g;that-the-conditions in this decision that are required to be satisfied before issuance of a Final Certificate of Compliance have been met.' GC9. JDJ shall notify Commission staff in writing of least sixty (60) calendar days prior to its intent to seek a Preliminary and a Final Certificate of Compliance for the project. Such notification shall include a list of key contact(s), along with their telephone numbers, for questions that may arise during the Commission's compliance review. Commission staff shall complete an inspection under this condition, if warranted, Within fourteen (14) business days of such notification and inform_ JDJ in writing of any deficiencies and corrections needed. JDJ understands that the Commission has no obligation to issue any Certificate of Compliance unless all conditions are complied with or secured consistent with this decision. JDJ agrees to allow Cape Cod Commission staff to enter onto the property which is the subject of this decision for the purpose of determining whether the conditions contained in this decision, including those linked to each Certificate, have been met. GC10. Consistent with the Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals' (ZBA) Comprehensive permit dated July 9, 2004 (per the ZBA vote) for the proposed project called The Village Green this DRI decision is conditioned that there shall be no residential development on the project site locus. Natural Resources/Open Space NRC1. JDJ shall restore the disturbed areas of the wetland buffer following construction with native shrubs, trees and grasses. The applicant shall submit a restoration plan for Commission staff approval prior to receipt of a Preliminary Certificate. of Compliance. NRC2. Prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance for the Supply New England project, the Cobb Trust shall provide the Cape Cod Commission with a draft conservation restriction of a form and substance satisfactory to the Commission or its designee and consistent with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 184, § 31 - 33 and accompanying plan which provides that the Israel Pond parcel, identified by Barnstable Assessor's map 332, parcel 005 shall be preserved as permanent open space. Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 I 21 The restriction and site plan shall be approved by Commission counsel, executed and recorded at the Registry'of Deeds or Registry District.of the Land Court, and proof of recording shall be provided to the Commission 60 days prior to the receipt of the Final Certificate of Compliance. In order to preserve the significant habitat values of the parcel, the land subject to this conservation restriction shall. remain undisturbed for conservation and wildlife habitat preservation purposes, with the exception that walking trail access may be provided and used by the Barnstable school system consistent with this condition. The conservation restriction shall be conveyed to an appropriate conservation entity, including the state Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, the Town of Barnstable, or the Barnstable Land:Trust.. Alternately, the Cobb Trust may opt to convey the Israel Pond parcel to the state Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, the Town of Barnstable, or the Barnstable Land Trust for conservation purposes prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance for the_Supply New England project. The form and substance of the deed__ shall be approved by Commission counsel prior to recording. NRC3. Prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance for the Supply New England project, JDJ shall clean up the dumping that has occurred on the Rose Lodge /Shallow Pond parcel, and shall revegetate those portions of the area to be conservation restricted that are presently cleared of all vegetation. Commission staff shall approve a revegetation plan prior to implementation. NRC4. Prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance for the Supply New England project, JDJ shall provide the Cape Cod Commission with a draft conservation restriction of a form and substance satisfactory to the Commission or its designee and consistent with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 184, § 31 — 33 and accompanying plan which provides that 2 acres of the Shallow Pond parcel, identified by Barnstable Assessor's map 253, parcel 019, parcel extension T00, shall be preserved as permanent open space. The restriction and site plan shall be approved by Commission counsel, executed and recorded at the Registry of Deeds or Registry District of the Land Court, and proof of recording shall be provided to the Commission 60 days prior to the receipt of the Final Certificate of Compliance. In order to preserve the significant habitat values of the parcel, the land subject to this conservation restriction shall remain undisturbed. for conservation and wildlife habitat preservation purposes, with the exception that walking trail access may be provided. The conservation restriction shall be conveyed to an appropriate conservation entity to be approved by Commission counsel, including but not limited to the Town of Barnstable or the Barnstable Land Trust. NRC5. Prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance for the Supply New England project, the co-applicants shall provide a plan for Commission staff approval for controlling off-road vehicle access to the Site. Prior to issuance of a Final Certificate of Compliance, the co-applicants shall implement the plan. NRC6. The co-applicants shall make every effort to prevent the introduction of invasive species to the site, particularly during construction. Any fill or loam brought to the site should be free of invasive species, and construction vehicles shall be inspected prior Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 22 to entering the site to ensure that invasive species have not "caught a ride" in the tire treads, wheel wells, or earth moving buckets. Water Resources WRC1. The project shall apply for a connection permit from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and to the town of Barnstable to connect to town sewer to enable the project to meet the 1-ppm standard set forth in MPS 2.1.1.2.F.2. If the applications are approved, the project shall connect to sewer. In the interim, the proposed project may use a Title-5 septic system as proposed. WRC2. Prior to the issuance of the Preliminary Certificate of Compliance, JDJ and the sub-tenant shall designate on the site plans the area draining to the vegetated swale (Le. north-east corner of the paved parking area, at the 63-foot contour note on the Proposed Grading & Landscape Plan, revised September 7, 2005) as the fleet-truck storage and parking area in accordance with MPS 2.1.8.2. The co-applicants shall also designate the fleet-truck storage and parking area with signs and pavement markings. Prior to issuance of the Final Certificate of Compliance, Commission staff will verify designation'of the fleet-truck storage and parking area. WRC3. Prior to the release of any Certificate of Compliance, the Operations & Management plan shall be updated by JDJ, and shall be submitted for approval by Commission staff, as noted in Finding WRF9, to ensure that the project meets MPSs 2.1.1.2.A.5 and MPS 2.1.3.6. The revised O&M plan shall reflect the project's grading changes noted in Finding WRF9.. At minimum, the plan shall contain the following information and provisions: ■ Identify the party.responsible for implementing the plan in accordance with MPS 2.1.3.2; ■ Detailed spill prevention and containment plan to be posted in a conspicuous place within the project building, particularly to address spills in areas that drain to the vegetated swale from the designated fleet-truck storage and parking area, in accordance with. MPS 2.1.3.2; ■ Identify best management practices and provide a cumulative account of total suspended solids removal up to a minimum of 80% in accordance with MPS 2.1.3.2; ■ Inspection, monitoring, maintenance schedule; ■ Engineer's stamp certifying that the stormwater system is capable of handling the 25-year 24-hour storm in accordance with MPS 2.1.3.2; ■ Detailed spill prevention, .response and containment components, in accordance with MPS 2.1.3.2, which in particular address releases in areas that drain to the vegetated swale from the designated fleet-truck storage and parking area; and ■ Detailed turf-management plan that emphasizes water-conservation measures and minimizes use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides Supply New England — HDEX Decision - 6/29/06 i 23 through best-management practices in WHPAs in accordance with MPS 2.1.1.2.A.5. Community Character Building Design CCC1. Prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance from the Commission, JDJ shall submit for Commission staff approval the proposed color and finish of the exterior masonry blocks, metal. wall panels and metal roof. CCC2. Prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance from the Commission, JDJ shall submit for Commission staff approval an interior floor plan. Site Design/Landscaping CCC3. Prior to issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance from the Commission, the applicant shall submit for Commission staff approval a draft landscape maintenance contract for three full growing seasons based on guidelines provided by Commission staff. . A growing season is defined as the period between March 15th and October 31 st. Prior to issuance of a Final Certificate of Compliance, the applicant shall provide a fully executed landscape maintenance contract for three full growing seasons. CCC4. Plant materials specified by this decision may be substituted with prior written approval of Commission staff. CCC5. If all required site work and/or landscape improvements are not complete at the time a Final Certificate of Compliance is sought from the Commission, any work that is incomplete shall be subject to an escrow agreement of form and content satisfactory to Commission counsel. The amount of the escrow agreement shall equal 150% of the cost of that portion of the incomplete work, including labor and materials, with the amount approved by Commission staff. The escrow agreement may allow for partial release of escrow funds upon partial completion of work. The check shall be payable to Barnstable County with the work approved by Commission staff prior to release of the escrow funds. Unexpended escrow funds shall be returned to the applicant, with interest, upon completion of the required work. All site work and/or landscape improvements shall be completed within six (6) months of issuance of a Final Certificate of Compliance from the Commission. CCC6. Prior to issuance of a preliminary Certificate of Compliance, the applicant shall submit plans for any proposed building or pylon signs for staff approval to ensure their consistency with MPS 6.2.11. Such plans shall include proposed materials, method of illumination and dimensions. Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 24 Exterior Lighting CCC7. All,exterior lighting for the proposed project shall be consistent with MPS 6.2.10 and Technical Bulletin 95-001. CCC8. Prior to issuance of the Preliminary Certificate of Compliance, JDJ shall submit for review and approval by Commission staff information on the project's proposed exterior lighting, including fixture cuts, lamp and shielding. This submission may be made in writing/paper copies, or by providing Commission staff with information on the fixture manufacturer(s) so that a search of the Internet may be conducted by Commission staff. Unless the Commission staff approves the proposed exterior lighting in writing, no Preliminary Certificate may be issued. CCC9. Should unexpected conditions arise that require redesign or adjustments to the project's exterior lighting fixtures, including substitutions of fixture heads, the applicant shall first obtain written approval from the Commission prior to implementing the changes, including prior to installation. Modifications made to the exterior lighting design that are found by Commission staff to be in accordance with Technical Bulletin 95-001 may be approved by Commission staff. CCC10. . Prior to issuance of a Final Certificate of Compliance, in-the-field verification of light levels and the lighting design must be conducted by Commission staff to verify conformance with the requirements of this decision, Technical Bulletin 95-001 and MPS 6.2.10. Noise NC1. Prior to issuance of the Preliminary.Certificate of Compliance, JDJ and the sub- tenant shall confirm whether or not the project will involve an emergency generator. Hazardous MaterialsMastes HAZC1. No more than 25 gallons or its dry weight equivalent in total of hazardous materials or,hazardous wastes shall be used, treated, generated, handled, or stored on-site at any time. There shall be no on-site disposal of hazardous materials or wastes. Compressed gas or natural gas shall be used for heating and emergency power generation. The project shall be constructed without floor drains except for those required in lavatory/bathrooms per the Massachusetts Plumbing Code. HAZC2. JDJ and the sub-tenant shall establish and maintain a program to properly handle, store and dispose of used fluorescent light bulbs and any other hazardous waste generated by the facility. HAZC3. Prior to issuance of a Final Certificate of Compliance, JDJ and the sub-tenant shall submit for review and approval by.Commission staff a copy of a program to seek out least-toxic products, and to properly dispose of used fluorescent light tubes and any other hazardous waste generated by the facility. No Final Certificate of Compliance shall be issued until JDJ and the sub-tenant submit the information required by this condition and Commission staff issues a written approval of the Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 + 25 program(s) as consistent with MPS 4.3.1.1 and 4.3.1.2 of the 2002 RPP and this decision. HAZC4. Prior to the issuance of a Final Certificate of Compliance, JDJ and the sub- tenant shall submit for review and approval by Commission staff a copy of an emergency response plan which is consistent with MPS 4.3.1.4. No Final Certificate of Compliance shall be issued until the co-applicants submit the information required by this condition and Commission staff issues a written approval of the revised emergency response plan as consistent with MPS 4.3.1.4 and this decision. Transportation Resources TC1. Before the issuance of the Preliminary Certificate of Compliance, the.final site plan shall be submitted for Commission transportation staff review and approval for consistency with the 2002 Regional Policy Plan and this decision. TC2. All landscaping, signage, lighting and other human made objects shall be located to prevent interference with site driveway sight distances, to minimize safety conflicts, and to minimize glare. These details shall be shown on the final site plan and supporting documents and this requirement is subject to review and approval by Commission transportation staff as specified in Condition TC1. Prior to issuance of the Final Certificate of Compliance, the landscaping, signage, lighting, and other human made objects shall be complete and meet the requirements stated herein. TC3. All development utilities shall be located underground to prevent interference with site driveway sight distances and to minimize safety conflicts. This detail shall be . shown on the final site plan and supporting documents and this requirement is subject to review and approval by Commission transportation staff as specified in Condition TC1. Prior to issuance of the Final Certificate of Compliance, the utilities shall be in place underground. TC4. The co-applicants shall provide a ten (10) foot sidewalk right-of-way on the development Site along the Independence Drive frontage for construction of a public sidewalk should the town of Barnstable decide to construct such a sidewalk at any time in the future and should the right-of-way be needed to accomplish the sidewalk construction. This detail shall be shown on the final site plan and is subject,to review and approval by Commission staff as specified in. Condition TC1. TC5. Prior to the issuance of the Final Certificate of Compliance, but after substantial completion of the site driveway, the Independence Drive median break, landscaping, signage, and utilities, the co-applicants shall retain a Massachusetts registered Professional Engineer to evaluate actual sight distances. The co-applicants shall submit a signed and sealed letter from said Professional Engineer detailing evaluation results at the driveway and certifying that the sight distances meet the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials requirements for safe stopping sight distances. This requirement shall apply both to the intersection of the site driveway with Independence Drive and to the Independence Drive median break. Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 26 TC6. The width of the site driveway shall be limited to 24 feet maximum. Appropriate turning radii may also be added per mutual agreement of the applicant and Commission transportation staff. These details shall be shown on the final site plan and this requirement is subject to review and approval by Commission staff as specified in Condition TC1. Prior to issuance of the Final Certificate of Compliance, the site driveway shall be completed according to the final approved site plans. TC7. The co-applicants shall allow access across the development site for all users who currently have access rights to the utility easement and service roadway. TC8. The number of parking spaces shall be limited to the minimum required b the p g P q Y town of Barnstable. The number of parking spaces shall be shown on the final site plan and documentation calculating the required number of spaces shall be submitted to Commission transportation staff. Upon mutual agreement of the Commission transportation staff and the applicant, the number of spaces may be reduced below the town minimum and/or may include landscape reserve spaces. However, in no case shall the total number of spaces (built and reserve) exceed the town minimum. This requirement is subject to review and approval by Commission transportation staff as specified in Condition TC1. Prior to issuance of the Final Certificate of Compliance, the parking spaces shall be completed according to the final approved site plans. TC9. Prior to the issuance of a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance, JDJ shall pay a fee of $20,000. These funds shall be held by Barnstable County/Cape Cod Commission. p Twenty-five percent of funds collected under this requirement shall be Y expended upon the recommendation of the Cape Cod Commission Executive rt projects or strategies that encourage alternatives to automobile Director to support p � g g travel. These include but are not limited to planning, design, or construction of alternatives to automobile travel. These include but are not limited to planning, design, or construction of alternatives to automobile travel such as bicycle paths and sidewalks; supporting, marketing, or promoting bus or shuttle services; the purchase of land capable of generating trips and the reservation of such land in a way that permanently prohibits trip generation; and/or the monitoring of traffic volumes, speeds, and vehicle classification. The remaining seventy-five percent of the funds shall be expended upon the recommendation of the Cape Cod Commission Executive Director, and may be used for the above purposes and may also be used to fund the expansion of roadway capacity including but not limited to planning, engineering, permitting, and construction. Funds shall be expended within the project's impact area or within the Town of Barnstable..Any funds remaining after 10 ..years from the time of receipt of the funds shall be transferred to the Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority or its successor agency to fund public transportation on Cape Cod. Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 I ` 27 SUMMARY The Cape Cod Commission hereby approves with conditions the application of the Enoch T. Cobb Trust and JDJ Housing Development, LLC, as co-applicants, for a Development of Regional Impact Hardship Exemption as outlined in this decision pursuant to Sections 12; 13 and 23 of the Act, c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended for the proposed Supply New England project located in Barnstable, MA. Commission Chair Date COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Barnstable, ss l0 , 2006 Before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared 4'10-h in his capacity as Chairman of the Cape Cod Commission, whose name is signed on the preceding document, and such person acknowledged to me that he signed such document voluntarily for its stated purpose. The identity of such person was proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was personal knowledge of the undersigned. / I Notary Public My Commission Expires: `0 /3 8 Supply New England — HDEX Decision — 6/29/06 of BA$ CAPE COD COMMISSION 0r 3225 MAIN STREET v P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 �ssACHUSti� (508)362-3828 FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org BY FAX AND REGULAR MAIL June 19, 2007 Attorney Patrick M. Butler Nutter, McClennen & Fish 1523 lyannough Road P.O. Box 1630 f Hyannis, MA 02601-1630 RE. Northern Heritage Builders/Supply New England (Barnstable) Dear Attorney Butler: This letter is being sent to you based on the requirements of condition GC9, and as the contact person for the above project. This letter also concerns the two letters with attachments that the Cape Cod Commission (Commission) received from Nutter, McClennen & Fish on June 6, 2007 and June 15, 2007, respectively, connected to the Northern Heritage Builders/Supply New England project at 755 Independence Drive, Barnstable. I have reviewed these letters, and have outlined below the items that I believe need to be addressed before the Commission can issue a Preliminary Certificate of Compliance. The areas and items noted below are based on conditions in the Development of Regional Impact Hardship Exemption (DRI HDEX) decision (as modified). Exterior Lighting • Describe in writing (including via a foot-candle plan) the project's proposed side -1 wide exterior lighting design Provide in writing or by a searchable internet site the proposed fixture— Noise r.? • Confirm whether or not the project will involve an emergency generator + L� 2 Landscaping • Amend draft maintenance contract -incorporate Integrated Pest Management practices into Item #2 I also believe that condition GC11 of the modification decision requires that the recently established water resources escrow agreement needs to be finalized, signed by all parties, and funded (i.e. the escrow agreement and monies are in place) before a Preliminary Certificate can be issued. will be on vacation from June 22, 2007 to July 8, 2007, returning to work on July 9, 2007. In the interim, please contact each of the technical staff listed below should you have specific questions concerning different issue areas covered in the DRI HDEX decision (as modified). I have provided them with copies of your two letters. Sincerely, Andrea Adams Planner/Hazardous Waste Specialist Ccs (Regular Mail): Attorney Liza Cox, Nutter, McClennen & Fish Patty Daley, Barnstable Growth Management Department 'homas Perry, Barnstable Building Commissioner Royden Richardson, Barnstable Commission Member Commission Technical Staff— Heather McElroy, Scott Michaud, Sarah Korjeff, Leslie Richardson and Glenn Cannon Northern Heritage Builders—6/19/07 ��`'-�� - � � � - -- ��--(f ----- - � — pc�- r . i --- -- � � � - - � � � i - -- { - -_ -L -- - -- I F i ... Nutter Eliza Cox Direct Line: 508-790-5431 Fax: 508-771-8079 E-mail: ecox@nutter.com MEMORANDUM April 4, 2007 101433-9 BY HAND TO: Tom Perry, Building Commissioner Ellen Swiniarski rk' Site Plan Review ( FROM: Patrick Butler Eliza Cox �Z__(� RE: Northern Heritage Builders 755 Independence Drive, Barnstable We are writing on behalf of our client, JDJ Housing Development, LLC, the lessee of the above referenced property in connection with the development of a warehouse which was reviewed and approved by the Barnstable Site Plan Review Committee as SPR #047-06. For your reference, a copy of the Site Plan Review approval letter, dated October 24, 2006, is enclosed. When this development was originally permitted through the Cape Cod Commission, the anticipated subtenant and user of the proposed building was identified as Supply New England, an existing business in Hyannis. As you are aware, during the course of the permitting, Supply New England opted to pursue another location. At the time of the Formal Site Plan Review hearing, we indicated that the proposed subtenant and user was not known. The purpose of this memorandum is to advise that Northern Heritage Builders, Inc., ("NHB") will be the sublessee and user of the proposed building. NHB presently has offices in Hyannis (135 Barnstable Road) and will be relocating its operations, together with its affiliate AlA Steel, to 755 Independence Drive. For your background, we have enclosed herewith a copy of a letter dated February 23, 2007, that we forwarded to the Cape Cod Commission in the context of identifying NHB as the subtenant in accordance with the conditions of the Cape Cod Commission approval. The enclosed correspondence describes the proposed users and includes revised floor, site and elevation plans for the proposed building. NUTTER McCLENNEN &" FISH LLP •ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1513 Iyannough Road • P.O. Box 1630 • Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601-1630 • 508-790-5400 • Fax: 508-771-8079 www.nutter.com Tom Perry, Building Commissioner April 4, 2007 Page 2 As indicated in the February 23, 2007 letter and shown on the plans, the proposed building is actually smaller than the structure originally permitted. However, the new building is in the same location as the originally permitted development, and there have been no changes to the front yard landscape buffer, parking configuration, outdoor storage, loading areas, wetland limit lines and access/egress. The only site layout change is that the proposed building has a reduced footprint. On March 19, 2007, we appeared before the Regulatory Committee of the Cape Cod Commission to advise of the new tenant. The Regulatory Committee approved the change in tenant and we are awaiting a copy of the modification decision. The only new condition to be imposed by the Cape Cod Commission is that the applicant may be required to install a de- nitrification septic system if unable to connect to town sewer. We are still awaiting the actual language of the modification, but what we have discussed with Commission staff is language which provides that the applicant may use a standard Title V system for a period of time while it pursues connection to town sewer. If, after that period of time, it is unable to make such connection to sewer, the applicant will be required to upgrade the Title V system to a de-nitrification system. We will forward to you the modification decision once it is finalized. In the interim, we would request, if possible, that you administratively approve the revised plans for the purposes of the Site Plan Review file (No. 047-06). We would be happy to present the revised plans to the Site Plan Review committee if deemed appropriate, but since the only change is a smaller building, we would request that you first review the new plans to determine if they may be administratively approved. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or should you require additional information. Thank you very much. 1619795.1 I OCT.26 2006 7:00PM PLANNING N0.011 P 2/3 ?� I Town of Bamstable 200 Main Street,Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 : F Growth Management Department Thomas A.Broadrick,AICP 367 Main Street,Hyannis,Massachusetts 0260 Director of Regulatory Rovicw Phone(508)862-4785 Fax(508)862-4725 w".towh.hansstable mains t I �jE October 24,2006iN i I rt, JDJ Housing Development,LLC 'c/o Patrick Butler,Esq. L' +': . I a 4 r Liza Cox,Esq. Natter Mc Clennen&Fish,LLP V. 0.Box 1630 i Hyannis,MA 02601 Reference: Site Plan Review#047-06,JDJ Housing Development,LLC Prb P osal: . Lease 3.09 acres of an already disturbed 12.80 acre'site and construct warehouse/showroom building with footprint of 21,120 sf,3,800.sf outdoor storage together with associated parking,larxdscaping and related infinstructure. � , it Dear Attorneys Butler and Cox: 1 I 4 Please be advised that subsequent to the formal site plan review meetin Ion September 14, 2006,the Building Commissioner,Tom Perry,has issued an adrn s Ve approval subject to l s . EI ; �I ,rr r the,f0116 Iwuig j y , p I a t i t -.. �- • All'construction shall be in coin liance with the approve. entitled;"Site A ppr P Develo ment Plans,#'/55 Independence Drive,Barnstable, t„02630",Prepared for I p .. ,,; I JDJ Housing Development,LLC c/o Keller Co,Osterville, and consisting of dive sheets,stamped and signed on 10/03/06 by Arne H.0 ala, Frof.Land Surveyor and Prof. I f Engineer of Down Cape Engineering,Yarmouthport,MA Arid dated 01/12/05,revised 6/10/05,7/18/06 and final revision per site plan review comments on October 3,2006. • Applicant must obtain all other applicable permits,licenses acid approvals required, •. Upon completion of all work,a registered engineer or land surveyor shall submit a letter of certification,made upon knowledge and belief in accordapce'with professional standards that all worlr has been done in substantial complia}ice;with the approved site plan(Zoning Section 240-104(G). This document shall.,be submitted prior to the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy. i ; 1.71 rl q { Ir I }}(( ,y � OCT.262006 7.00PM PLANNING NO.011 P.3/3 A copy of the approVO lan Will be available on file. If ou have an Y y questions,or require I k fuither assisnce,my direct telephone number is 508-862-4679. j 1. aI i Sincerely, k fy El}en 1VI. ►7winiazAi C Site Plan Review Coordinator k ' Ut ,r i Tom PeM,Building Commissionbr P I ` j l alz it I I I l II L- [ J I �• 4g tM �� 311 i li i. iI,It ' i 1 I I I� I '3•�" I i IL r r II- J Nutter Patrick Butler Eliza Cox Direct Line: 508-790-5431 Fax: 508-771-8079 E-mail: ecox@nutter.com MEMORANDUM February 23, 2007 101433-9 By Hand TO: Andrea Adams, Planner CC: JDJ Housing Development, LLC (w/ plans) David Cole, Trustee of the Enoch T. Cobb Trust (w/ plans) Northern Heritage Builders, Inc. (w/ plans) Dan Ojala, Down Cape Engineering (w/o encl.) FROM: Patrick Butle, , Eliza Cox 2j ,ZG RE: 755 Independence Drive, Barnstable (the "Property") This memorandum is submitted on behalf of our client, JDJ Housing Development, LLC, a co-applicant in the June 29, 2006 Development of Regional Impact Hardship Exemption (#TR-05009 / HDEX-05009) permitting the development of a 26,132 square foot warehouse/showroom building on the above referenced Property (the "DRI Exemption"). At the time of the filing of the application for the DRI Exemption, the anticipated subtenant and user of the proposed building was identified as Supply New England, an existing business in Hyannis which sells/distributes plumbing and heating related supplies. As you are aware, during the course of the permitting of this Property, Supply New England opted to pursue an alternate location. In accordance with Condition GC3 of the DRI Exemption, it is the purpose of this memorandum to identify the new sub-lessee and user of the proposed structure. The proposed building, as modified and described below, will be sub-leased to Northern Heritage Builders, Inc. ("NHB"). NHB presently has Massachusetts' offices in Hyannis (135 Barnstable Road), Natick and Nantucket. The existing NHB Hyannis office will be relocated to the Property. As described in the brochure submitted herewith, NHB offers building construction management, general contracting, and home building and design services. Additional descriptions of these services may be found on NHB's website (www.northernheritage.com). NUTTER McCLENNEN & FISH LLP -ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1513 Iyannough Road - P.O. Box 1630 w Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601-1630 - 508-790-5400 ® Fax: 508-771-8079 www.nutter.com Andrea Adams, Planner February 23, 2007 Page.2 In connection with these building and design services, NHB also operates an in-house millwork shop in which it converts rough sawn lumber into finely finished cabinets, paneling, doors, veneers and moldings. NHB, together with AlA Steel Company (an affiliated company), which will also be relocating to the Property, also utilizes warehouse space to purchase and store raw materials, including steel, rebar, lumber, and flooring until these materials are required at an individual building site. In terms of the development of the Property, we enclose herewith the full set of civil site plans for the development of the Property prepared by Down Cape Engineering, as previously approved in the DRI Exemption, but revised and updated to accommodate NHB. These plans have a latest revision date of February 21, 2007. In addition, we enclose two sheets of elevations showing the proposed building as revised as well as basic first and second (mezzanine) floor plans. As shown on the plans submitted herewith, the proposed structure is in the same location on the Property as was approved by the DRI Exemption. In addition, the front yard landscape buffer, parking configuration, outdoor storage, loading areas, and wetland work limit lines remain identical to the plan set approved in the DRI Exemption. The only site layout change is that the proposed building has a reduced footprint on the site. The development originally approved in the DRI Exemption contained a footprint of 21,120 square feet. In comparison, the new building proposed by NHB will have a reduced footprint of 15,300 square feet. The outline of the approved 21,120 square foot building footprint is shown on the plans to highlight this comparison. As shown on the architectural plans and the floors plans enclosed, the proposed building will contain: • 2,000 square foot basement • 2,700 square feet of first floor administrative office space • 900 square foot first floor lobby entrance 0 10,800 square feet of first floor warehouse space • 900 square feet of staging and distribution on the first floor • 3,600 square feet of second floor/mezzanine administrative, support and infrastructure space. it ' t Andrea Adams, Planner February 23, 2007 Page 3 Accordingly, the total floor area is approximately 20,900 square feet. This is approximately 5,300 square feet less than the originally permitted building which had a gross floor area of approximately 26,132 square feet. The Property will be used by NHB and AIA Steel as described above. It is contemplated that the 3,800 square foot outdoor storage area previously approved in the DRI Exemption and shown on the easterly property line will be utilized primarily for storage of steel and rebar. The NHB truck and equipment fleet is generally maintained on the individual job sites. It is estimated that, on average, the company's active fleet of vehicles includes five pieces of construction equipment (e.g., bob-cat, dumpster, front end loader), 8-9 small trucks and 2-4 larger trucks that could be on the Property at a given time. This is consistent with the proposed plumbing supply company information. The use of the building by NHB and AIA Steel is, we believe, consistent with the use approved in the DRI Exemption. In addition, as shown on the plans, the building and site layout are consistent (and virtually identical) to the layout approved in the DRI Exemption. Accordingly, in accordance with Condition GC3, we would request that this matter be scheduled for the next available Regulatory Committee agenda for review in accordance with said condition. We understand that the next Regulatory Committee agenda is scheduled for March 5, 2007 and would request that this matter be placed on that agenda if possible. Certainly, please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions, comment'§ or should you require any additional information. Thank you very much. 1607269.1 'Feb,13 07 09:47a Sally Kelly- (508) p 2 s NORT44 FYI IMC+�S CoNF�rLGi.lG� ty� acp M►� Artli�11s1 ° M•G. r ; s��74 try ,-MR� cc q f Wooc-15 �vM P ArP 10 i µ.C. 27� gF oFciG� !a 8c> 5F W a,L .f � bb SF , , , , , ; qao f ---- All SOUTW ` Feb 13 07 09:47a Sally Kelly (508) p.3 NIORT14 Gt oSG�f �j rr M*L- 'r+✓b o �ca� o�►cF'' WD+ rM5 O b E I bsy>i SOU'M ■ }I 72f _ k kj�212 } - 7'` ._ - .w,3 ._v� r _�_._:- a Y�'�"r6__a...„ u•-"��`�r��'vZY �ut,'�''s��� s { Kp ,ii U �t I 4. Mill�lif / E — c !�, i c -V1sr�✓°I _s¢ c r c Y'CFK 1 n � t'/ /r/ �i_.�� •-- r I s�'--•s r'�-`. L al ji °- fi_ " - .✓. rr�rh r f�. � +� / � 7 _a w'��� Pr`)t rx i i.�7 a :. ,� +4 � __ � `��, 3�c.Zt �"'' i ' - �� �' � � ?; - r�,,3 J�4^ Xo—Q Erlz n . ' sr. S h.t � a 0 e xJti 1ANN. _ y l j Ai " i lfl � M Y ri 1 w r � inn L, �W�n b I 4 } 45 i mm k I I r� a F OUR MISSION . Northern Heritage Builders, Inc. is committed to providing a world class building experience for every client. We capture the spirit of each project by understandin. : a client's vision, providing superior construction, collaborating as a team,and supporting the client irelationship long after the completion of a project. ' L t 1 135 Barnstable Road Hyannis,MA 02601 •76 Goldfinch Drive Nantucket,MA 02554•49 Eliot Street South Natick,MA 01760 800.322.5261 • 508.775.4353 • 508.655.6554 • FAX 508.775.4610•www.northernheritage.com I TESTIMONIALS 3: "We are writing to express our thanks and gratitude for the work you and your team hav, _ k"ef us at our Nantucket home ... We found that we were working with a company of excepti and knowledge.Our project presented itself with numerous challenges: a tight time f o complicated engineering, lots of custom detail ... Every challenge was met not only but also with enthusiasm.Our deadline could not have been met without the exc ;: planning ahead." Denise Dupre, Dover, MA "As we near the completion of our building at 6 Coffin Street on Nantucket w to thank you and your crew for your tremendous efforts on behalf of our prof ; . Our e commercial facility has won rave reviews from virtually everyone and the :xh;Ity a A im ess p construction has been universally applauded ... I would not hesitate to us o tfa.>r e.t e o f future projects and would happily recommend you to others." Janis Aldridge 3 , President,Janis Aldridge, Inc L "in this day and age of quick turnarounds, it was refreshing to find a c s r la service as their main concern, rather than quantity. Your talents, effo s d'': ~`z= fe i. alism came shining through at each phase. Northern Heritage w s., . tt11 so ortunate to have had the opportunity to have you build our Nantuck Kathy and Amo Ross, Basking Ridge, NJ "In January of this year,our oceanfront home on Cape Cod suffered a tremendous amount of water damage by reason of a burst pipe. The damage was extensive and the home has a tremendous amount of detail. We engaged Northern Heritage to handle the restoration ... they diligently and thoroughly restored our home in mint condition and on time [Memorial Day]. As the President of a commercial real estate firm, I have dealt with many contractors, but none better than Northern Heritage." Steven S. Fischman President, New England Development 135 Barnstable Road Hyannis,MA 02601 • 76 Goldfinch Drive Nantucket, MA 02554 •49 Eliot Street South Natick, MA 01760 800.322.5261 • 508.775.4353 • 508.655.6554 • FAX 508.775.4610•www.northernheritage.com COMPANY PROFILE. Northern Heritage Builders, Inc. provides Design Build,Construction Management,and GeV it Contracting services to owners,architects,and developers throughout New England andY. Founded in 1990,the company currently maintains offices in Hyannis, Nantucket,and S aJ-ck, MA. During the last five years,the company has experienced steady,controlled growth :f rh Heritage has developed a high level of financial integrity and confidence, critical too today's business environment. Northern Heritage supports and participates in cultu, charitable,and professional organizations in the communities in which we are es t b a SERVICES Our services are designed to provide the client maximum flexibility,with valkf orm': ft�� provided through access to cost estimates and analysis using an"open This type of approach increases control over the project and its related costs. Ij PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Feasibility Studies Budgets and Estimates Assistance with Planning and Permitting Constructability Reviews and Cost Analysis Preliminary Schedules ` ' CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Critical Path Scheduling ,.y Construction Management Site Management/Administration Property Management Waste Management Millwork CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES On-Island Trucking Offices in Hyannis, Nantucket,and South Natick Millwork Facility in Hyannis Quality Team of Professional Craftsmen On-Site Dedicated to Project Completion 135 Barnstable Road Hyannis, MA 02601 •76 Goldfinch Drive Nantucket,MA 02554•49 Eliot Street South Natick, MA 01760 800.322.5261 • 508.775.4353 • 508.655.6554 • FAX 508.775.4610 •www.northernheritage.com PROPERTY MANAGEMENT In addition to our full one year warranty that we include with all construction/renovation projects,we offer a property management/home care service program that can be customi v to fit your needs. Many customers have found this to an invaluable service as it enables you to ome and go,winter or summer as your schedule permits,with the secure knowledge that your rty is in good hands.We can also manage any project you plan for your home or property. At Northern Heritage,we value the relationship we.develop with our customers and we committed to continuing the relationship and forming a partnership for life. OUR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INCLUDE: Weekly home site visits 24-Hour emergency rest Winter watch-November thru March Seasonal openin.-s/�los cgs 1 Spring home inspection Alarm response f t� House cleaning Post-storm checks Receive deliveries/vendors Routine ma`Rit' an�� - Landscaping br lawn care Pool services . Pest control Window cleani�mg And much more ... 1 . -w y Other miscellaneous home-related services are also available. 135 Barnstable Road Hyannis, MA 02601 • 76 Goldfinch Drive Nantucket, MA 02554 •49 Eliot Street South Natick,MA 01760 800.322.5261 • 508.775.4353 • 508.655.6554 • FAX 508.775.4610 •www.northernheritage.com c. f F Vor a buildin g experience second to none, where on-time completion and on-target budgeting are vital to the integrity of your project, Northern Heritage Builders will answer the call. Serving owners, architects and developers throughout New England, including Cape Cod, Nantucket,The Hamptons and Palm Beach. e_ - � ,x f �1 I IP ' t m t 135 Barnstable Rd. • Hyannis, MA 02601 I I,! ! 76 Goldfinch Dr. • Nantucket, MA 02554 LM Fa NORTHERN t; CYa ' i 800.322.5261 508:775.4353 I4F7PT'T'ArF' °FtKT Town of Barnstable '10�-VN [:,AFONSDABLE 200 Main Street,Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 MAS.& • 2006 OCT 27 AM 6: 42 F39. Growth Management Department Thomas A. Broadrick, AICP 367 Main Street,Hyannis,Massachusetts 02601 Director of Regulatory Review Phone(508)862-4785 Fax(508)862-4725 www.tovm-lftFaieEaU--xna.0 mVISI October 24, 2006 . JDJ Housing Development, LLC c/o Patrick Butler, Esq. Liza Cox, Esq. Nutter McClennen & Fish, LLP P. O. Box 1630 Hyannis, MA 02601 y Reference: Site Plan Review# 047-06, JDJ Housing Development, LLC Proposal: Lease 3.09 acres of an already disturbed 12.80 acre site and construct 1 warehouse/showroom building with footprint of 21,120 sf, 3,800 sf outdoor storage together with associated parking, landscaping and related infrastructure. Dear Attorneys Butler and Cox: Please be advised that subsequent to the formal site plan review meeting on September 14, 2006, the Building Commissioner, Tom Perry, has issued an administrative approval subject to the following: • All construction shall be in compliance with the approved plan entitled, "Site Development Plans,#755 fndepende cneDrive, Barnstable, MA 02630",prepared for JDJ Housing Development,LLC c/o Keller Co, Osterville, MA and consisting of five sheets, stamped and signed on 10/03/06 by Arne H. Ojala, Prof. Land Surveyor and Prof. Engineer of Down Cape Engineering, Yarmouthport, MA and dated 01/12/05, revised 6/10/05, 7/18/06 and final revision per site plan review comments on October 3, 2006. • Applicant must obtain all other applicable permits, licenses and approvals required. • Upon completion of all work, a registered engineer or land surveyor shall submit a letter of certification, made upon knowledge and belief in accordance with professional standards that all work has been done in substantial compliance with the approved site plan(Zoning Section 240-104 (G). This document shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy. A copy of the approv-,d plan will be available on file. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, my direct telephone number is 508-862-4679. Sincerely, Ellen M. Swiniarski Site Plan Review Coordinator CC: SPR File Tom Perry,Building Commissioner Of BAs CAPE COD COMMISSION - 3225 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 8 2,�ssAcl-W FAX(508)362 3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org HEARING NOTICE CAPE COD COMMISSION The Cape Cod Commission("Commission") will conduct a public hearing on Monday, March 13, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the First District Courthouse, Assembly.of Delegates Chamber, Route 6A, Barnstable, MA. The following.Development of Regional Impact (DRI) has been submitted to the Cape Cod Commission under Section 13(a) and Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act, c. 716 of the Acts of 1.98.9, as amended, and Section.3 and Section 8 of the DRI Enabling Regulations. The project will be considered for a DRI approval and a DRI Hardship Exemption as a Project of Community Benefit. This notice is being published as required by Section 5 of the Cape Cod Commission Act. Project Name: Supply New England Project Applicant: Joseph Keller, c/o Attorney Patrick Butler, Nutter, McClennen & Fish Project Location: 755 Independence Drive/Cobb Trust Property, Hyannis, MA Project Description: Proposed construction of a 26,000 s.f. warehouse including a mezzanine, wholesale showroom and 9,100 s.f. of outdoor storage on a leased portion of a 12.80 acre site in the Industrial Park. Anyone wishing to testify orally will be welcome to do so. Written comments may also be submitted at the hearing, or delivered or mailed to the Cape Cod Commission,P.O. Box 226, 3225 Main Street, Barnstable,MA 02630 for reccz`.pt on or before the date of the hearing or until the.record is closed. The application,plans and relevant documents may be viewed by calling the Commission office at(508)362-3828 to schedule an appointment between the hours of 8.30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. If you need a reasonable accommodation,please let us know by March 7, 2006. Please.call the Commission for more information and to make a.request. C,i OF BAs CAPE COD COMMISSION U 3225 MAIN STREET d`/t6L� P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA(508)362-38282630 2a �FEB 23 Ptj sSACHU FAX(508)362-3136 + t. E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org !11�i5f0��--- HEARING NOTICE CAPE COD COMMISSION The Cape Cod Commission('.'Commission")will conduct a public hearing on Monday, March 13, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the First District Courthouse, Assembly of Delegates Chamber, Route 6A, Barnstable, MA. The following Development of Regional Impact(DRI) has been submitted to the Cape Cod Commission under Section 13(a) and Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act, c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended, and Section 3 and Section 8 of the DRI Enabling Regulations.The project will be considered for a DRI approval and a DRI Hardship Exemption as a Project of Community Benefit. This notice is being published as required by Section 5 of the Cape Cod Commission Act. Project Name: Supply New England Project Applicant: Joseph Keller; c/o Attorney Patrick Butler,Nutter, McClennen &Fish Project Location: 755 Independence Drive/Cobb Trust Property, Hyannis, MA Project'Description: Proposed construction of a 26,000 s.f. warehouse including a mezzanine, wholesale showroom and 9',100 s.f. of outdoor storage on a leased portion of a 12.80 acre site in the Industrial Park. Anyone wishing to.testify orally will be welcome to do so. Written comments may also be submitted at the hearing,-or delivered or mailed to the Cape Cod Commission,P.O. Box 226, 3225 MOn Street, Barnstable, MA 02630 for receipt on or before the date of the hewing or until the record is closed'. The application,plans and relevant documents may be viewed by calling the Commission office at(508)362-3828 to schedule an appointment between the hours of 8.30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. .If you need a reasonable accommodation,please let us know by March 7, 2006. Please.call the Commission for more information and to make a.request. �v OB Value Land Value Total Parcel Value $8,200 $450,700 $731,800 $2,200 $450,700 $735,300 $2,300 $450,700 $735,400 $1,800 $450,700 $732,000 $0 $450,700 $768,500 $0 $450,700 $768,100 $0 $486,300 $825,500 $0 $448,800 $781,800 $0 $448,800 $810,800 $0 $424,500 $740,900 $0 $422,300 $699,800 $0 $422,300 $650,600 $0 $233,500 $427,400 I $0 $233,500 $421,300 t $0 $233,500 $421,400 $0 $112,700 $281,800 $0 $112,700 $281,800 $0 $112,700 $279,200 :24446 7/24/2015 of Bas9 CAPE COD COMMISSION 3 O - - r 3225 MAIN STREET * * P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 U)O _ C)V (508)362-3828 SACHUsti FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk®capecodcommission.org DATE: September 29, 2005 To: Attorney Patrick M. Butler Nutter,McClennen &Fish 1523 Iyannough Road P.O. Box 1630 Hyannis, MA 02601-1630 FRoM: Cape Cod Commission r RE: Development of Regional Impact Exemption Cape Cod Commission Act, Section 12(k) APPLICANT: JDJ Housing Development, LLC SITE OWNER: Enoch T. Cobb Trust PROJECT#: DRI EX#05009/DRI TR#05009 PROJECT: Supply New England BOOK/PAGE: Book 4036 Page 119 DECISION.OF THE CAPE COD COMMISSION SUMMARY The Cape Cod Commission (Commission) hereby denies the application of JDJ Housing Development,LLC (Applicant) for an exemption from review as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Cape Cod Commission Act (Act), c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended, for the proposed Supply New England project (Project). The decision is rendered pursuant to a vote of the Commission on September 29, 2005. Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 t".1 2 PROTECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Project, as described in the exemption application and DRI referral form, is to construct a new 26,132 square foot warehouse/showroom building (with a 21,120 square foot footprint) and 9,100 square feet of outdoor storage space on a leased site in Hyannis. It also encompasses 42,440 square feet of pavement for parking and vehicle access. The Applicant,JDJ Housing Development,LLC, proposes to lease just over three(3) acres of a 12.80 parcel in Independence Park, which is owned by the Enoch T. Cobb Trust, David Cole,Trustee. The 3- acre site will then be sub-leased to Supply New England (formerly R.B. Corcoran Company), an existing business with stores in Barnstable County which sells/distributes plumbing and heating- related supplies. These include hard goods (pipe, fittings, faucets, towel bars, sinks, shower stalls, etc.) and chemicals (including clog removers, cleaners, and pipe cements). On several dates since the Commission received the exemption application on April 12, 2005, the Applicant submitted revised site plans. Taking the latest revision into account, the Project consists of a building with a 21,120 square foot footprint, including 5,016 square feet of display area and 3,800 square feet of outdoor storage and parking spaces. Revised plans received on September 21, 2005 reflect a reduced paved area, the size of which is not quantified on these plans. The site is currently vacant,partially wooded with wetland areas,is within a Significant Natural Resource Area that has been mapped for rare species habitat, and is zoned Industrial/Limited. It is also located in a Growth Activity Center according to the Commission-certified Barnstable Local Comprehensive Plan. The site, including the area to be leased for the new project, is also crossed by electrical transmission lines. PROCEDURAL HISTORY The Barnstable Town Manager referred this project to the Cape Cod Commission as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) on August 9, 2005.The Commission received the referral form on August 10, 2005. The application was deemed complete on August 11,2005. A duly noticed public hearing was held on August 30, 2005 at 7:00 pm at the Assembly of Delegates Chamber,First District Courthouse, in Barnstable,MA. The public hearing was continued to September 12,2005 at 12:30 PM at the Cape Cod,Commission office in Barnstable, MA. The Subcommittee voted unanimously at this meeting to recommend to the full Commission to deny the DRI Exemption. . The Applicant requested at this continued public hearing that it be allowed to submit additional information for reconsideration by the Subcommittee. On September 16, 2005, the Commission received a Memorandum and revised. site plans from Nutter, McClennen and Fish, The Subcommittee held a meeting on September 21, 2005 at 9:30 am at the Commission's office in Barnstable Village, MA. The materials submitted by the Applicant to the Commission on September 16, 2005 were reviewed by the Subcommittee at the meeting on September 21, 2005. After hearing the Applicant's request for reconsideration, and reviewing the newly submitted information the Subcommittee decided not to reconsider its unanimous vote to deny the exemption request and agreed to let the denial vote stand. The public hearing on the DRI exemption was continued to September 22, 2005 at the Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 2 3 Commission's office where it was closed by a hearing officer of the Commission, with the record kept open. The public hearing on the DRI was continued to 10:00 am on October 11, 2005 at the Commission's office. The vote of the full Commission on September 29, 2005 was to deny the DRI exemption. Materials submitted by the Applicant: DRI exemption application and attachments 4/12/05 Letter,Attorney Butler and Cox,DRI exemption cover 4/12/05 Copy of a check for$9,000 4/12/05 Letter,Attorney Cox,additional application materials 4/15/05 Commission Application cover sheet for a DRI exemption 4/15/05 E-mail,from Dan Ojala,site design issues 4/18/05 Letter,Attorney Cox,abutters list and copy of MHC green card 4/20/05 Letter,Attorney Butler and Cox,letter of intent between Cobb Trust and JDJ Housing 4/29/05 Memo,Attorney.Butler,additional application materials 6/15/05 Memo,Attorney Butler,revised site plans 6/15/05 Memo,Attorney Butler,information on economic development 6/20/05 Memo,Attorney Butler,additional application materials 6/20/05 E-mail,Attorney Cox,scheduling of hearing 6/22/05 E-mail,Attorney Cox,scheduling of hearing 6/22/05 Memo,Attorney Butler,transportation information 7/11/05 Fax,Attorney Butler,letter from Cobb Trust about sale of conservation restriction 7/13/05 Letter,Attorney Butler,scheduling of hearing 8/3/05 . E-mail,Attorney Cox,scheduling of hearing 8/10/05 Memo,Attorney Butler and Cox,revised landscape plan from Stephen Stimson 8/19/05 Memo,Attorney Cox,copies of applicant's materials for public hearing 8/22/05 Memo,Attorney Cox,revised floor plan and elevation drawings 8/23/05 Color photographs of interior/exterior of store in Hyannis 8/30/05 White sheet,Attorney Butler,water resources information 8/30/05 Yellow sheet,Attorney Butler,comparison with other projects 8/30/05 Green sheet,Attorney Butler,discussion of exemption 8/30/05 E-mail,Dan Ojala to Attorney Butler and Cox,revised plans/drawings 9/T05 Memo,Attorney Cox,revised plans/drawings from Dan Ojala as E-mailed 9/7/05 Copy of part of Change of Use decision,Attorney Butler 9/12/05 Memo,Attorney Butler,revised project information 9/16/05 E-mail,Attorney Butler,Memo from Trustee of Cobb Trust 9/20/05 Memo,to Trustee of Cobb Trust from Attorney Butler,discussions on sale of conservation restriction 9/21/05 E-mail,Attorney Cox,request to fax Memo to Cobb Trust Trustee,copying sets of materials,question on number of copies needed for the mailing 9/22/05 Memo,Attorney Cox,with copies of materials to be submitted to the full Commission 9/22/05 Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 3 ' 4 Colored sheets of paper—green and pink—from Attorney Butler,points made in Applicant's presentation at the full Commission meeting(received at the meeting) 9/29/05 Materials from a three-ring binder,from Attorney Butler,additional materials presented at the full Commission meeting as part of the Applicant's presentation,copies of Commission decisions 9/29/05 Sketch Plan,by DownCape Engineering,dated 9/12/05,from Attorney Butler 9/29/05 Copy,application cover,stamped by Town Departments Various Materials from the Cape Cod Commission: Letter,to Attorney Butler,DRI exemption application not complete 4/13/05 E-mail,to Dan Ojala,from Scott Michaud,water resources issues 4/15/05 Staff Routing form 4/21/05 E-mail,to Attorney Cox,application materials 6/22/05 Memo to staff with application materials 6/23/05 Letter,to Attorney Butler and Cox,scheduling of hearing 8/2/05' E-mail,to Commission staff,scheduling of hearing 8/8/05 E-mail,to and from Susan Kadar,project description and proposed hearing date 8/10/05 Fax cover sheet,to Attorney Cox,DRI referral form 8/10/05 E-mail,to Robin Giangregorio,receipt of DRI referral form 8/10/05 Fax cover sheet,to Attorney Butler,letter 8/11/05 Letter,to Attorney Butler,DRI referral received and application complete,discussion of hearing date 8/11/05 Fax cover sheet,to Joan Pierce,Massachusetts Department of Fish and Wildlife,copy of Project Summary from applicant . 8/18/05 Memo;to Subcommittee,site visit,hearing location and time 8/22/05 Staff report 8/24/05 Fax cover sheet,to Attorney Cox,Robin Giangregorio,and Ed Maroney,copy of staff report and date for hearing 8/24/05 E-mail,to Tom Broadrick,Director of Planning,copy of staff report,site visit date and time,and date and time for hearing 8/24/05 Locus map(aerial photo)for site visit 8/29/05 E-mail,to Attorney Cox,no written comments on project from public or others as of morning of August 30,2005 8/30/05 Hearing Notice 8/30/05 Draft Minutes 8/30/05 E-mail,to Attorney Butler and Cox,Town staff,Subcommittee update,Minutes 9/9/05 Fax cover sheet,to APCC,copy of staff report 9/6/05 E-mail,to staff,revised plans received from applicant 9/7/05 E-mail,to Sharon Rooney and Sarah Korjeff,revised building elevations 9/7/05 E-mail,to staff,revised plans received from applicant 9/8/05 E-mail,to Subcommittee,draft Minutes,Subcommittee Update,other info. 9/8/05 E-mail,transmission error message 9/8/05 Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 4 f 5 E-mail,to Roslyn Garfield,draft Minutes,Subcommittee Update,other info. 9/8/05 E-mail,to John Harris,draft Minutes,Subcommittee Update,other info. 9/8/05 Subcommittee update 9/8/05 E-mail,to Scott Michaud,request for copies of information for file 9/8/05 Outline of steps for the Subcommittee Chair 9/12/05 E-mail,from Susan Kadar,concerns about project 9/12/05 Hearing Notice 0/12/05 Sign In Sheet 9/12/05 Draft Minutes 9/12/05 E-mail,to Ed Maroney,copy of Project Update 9/14/05 E-mail,to Subcommittee and staff,meeting on September 21,2005 9/16/05 E-mail,to Subcommittee,applicant and Town Director of Planning,meeting on September 21, 2005 and copies of Commission materials 9/20/05 Subcommittee update 9/20/05 Fax cover sheet,to Attorney Butler 9/20/05 Meeting Notice 9/21/05 Hearing Notice 9/22/05 Memo,to Commission Members,including Subcommittee Members,copy of draft decision and other materials for consideration at the full Commission meeting 9/22/05 Fax cover sheet,to Roslyn Garfield,copy of revised draft decision 9/22/05 Fax confirmation sheet,to Attorney Cox,copy of Memo to Trustee of Cobb Trust 9/22/05 Fax cover sheet,confirmation sheet,to Attorney Butler and Barnstable Director of Planning,copy of draft decision as approved by Subcommittee Chair 9/23/05 Draft decision for full Commission hearing as distributed at 9/21/05 meeting 9/29/05 Hearing Notice for hearing before full Commission 9/29/05 Memo,to Commission Chair and Subcommittee Chair,outline of anticipated steps as part of the hearing before the full Commission 9/29/05 Memo,to Subcommittee,about September 21,2005 meeting Undated Materials from Federal State and Local Officials,Interested Parties,Public: Fax,DRI referral form,from Town of Barnstable 8/10/05 Letter,from APCC,expresses concerns about the project 9/20/05 The application and notices of public hearings relative thereto, the Commission staff's notes, exhibits and correspondence, the transcript and minutes of meetings and hearings and all written submissions received in the course of the Commission's proceedings are incorporated into the record by reference. r PUBLIC TESTIMONY The following is a summary of testimony received at the public hearings. See the project file for complete Minutes of the hearings and any Subcommittee meetings. Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 5 6 Hearing#1 —Assembly of Delegates Chambers—August 30,2005 Ms. Garfield opened the hearing at 7:05 PM. Mr. Harris read the hearing notice. Attorney Butler (Nutter), described the project. Attorney Butler said these 3 acres would be leased through a long-term ground lease to the Applicant, which would construct a 21,120 square foot building, as well as a 2,500 square foot showroom and 37 parking spaces. Attorney Butler noted the site plan had been modified to have a single entrance/exit as a result of meetings with Commission staff and Barnstable Site Plan Review. He said the project also included landscaping, and that development had been moved away from the wetland. Attorney Butler noted that there was a roadway on the site leading to the balance of the property behind the leased 3 acres, which the Cobb Trust would retain control over. Attorney Butler noted that no portion of the site was located inside the 50 foot wetland buffer. Attorney Butler said the Conservation Commission would have jurisdiction over that portion of the site within 100 feet of the wetland. Attorney Butler said the project was also subject to Site Plan Review. Attorney Butler said it was in the Industrial Zone. He noted it was in a Growth Activity Center in Barnstable's Local Comprehensive Plan. Attorney Butler said the area was specifically designated for warehouse-type uses, and that it was also in an Economic Opportunity Area. Attorney Butler said the project was the relocation of an existing business. Attorney Butler also distributed a white sheet with other plumbing supply companies, and their estimated water usage versus the project. Attorney Butler said the Town could adequately handle the hazardous materials and stormwater issues. Attorney Butler said a letter had been submitted for the record noting Mr. Cole's hope to place the balance of the parcel under a conservation restriction. He did note that the Trust would need to reach a financial accommodation with the Town of Barnstable, the Conservation Trust or the Division of Wildlife and Fisheries. On economic development, Attorney Butler said the impacts were positive. Attorney Butler said that Supply New England's location, character and environmental effects were not significant, were local, and within Barnstable. Ms. Adams summarized the staff report. She noted the project qualified as a DRI under section 3(e) of the Enabling Regulations as amended. Ms. Adams said the Commission received a DRI referral from the Town of Barnstable on August 10, 2005. She noted the Applicant had filed for consideration of a DRI exemption, and listed the criteria for a DRI approval. Ms. Adams addressed the project's impacts as a way to gauge whether the project should be granted a DRI exemption. On Natural Resources and Open Space, Ms. Adams noted the project site was located in a Significant Natural Resource Area as defined by the RPP, and the whole site was mapped by Massachusetts Natural Heritage as a priority habitat site for rare plant and animal species. She said the RPP required a minimum 100 foot undisturbed vegetated buffer area from wetlands to protect their natural functions, and that the rear of.,the building, outdoor storage area, and other construction activities were located within or would occur within the buffer area. Ms. Adams said the project was located in a number of regional water resource areas, including the Marine Water Recharge Area for Lewis Bay, a Wellhead Protection Area and a Potential Public Water Supply Area. She recommended review of the project as a DRI, to further limit the project's nitrogen loading concentration in groundwater to 1 ppm. She said it was also important that the project adequately treat stormwater. Ms. Adams said that based on her site visit to the company's existing store, it would likely have hazardous materials on hand in quantities in Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 6 t ' 7 excess of the RPPs limit. Ms. Adams said the company was an existing business, and that the move was not designed to increase the size of their operation, which would suggest a negligible impact on long-term regional employment. Ms. Adams recommended that the Subcommittee and staff needed an opportunity to review information to determine the project's community character impacts. On Transportation issues, Ms. Adams summarized the.project's estimated trip generation, and noted that the project's impacts on the intersection of Route 132 and Independence Drive was a concern,because this intersection experienced a significant number of crashes per year, and has been the subject of many meetings regarding poor operations and safety issues. Ms. Adams noted the Applicant had modified the proposed access plan to create only one curb cut on Independence Drive. She also said a cut in the median as the result of a 40(B) housing project on the opposite side of Independence Drive would not be turn-restricted. In conclusion,Ms. Adams said Commission staff recommended to the Subcommittee that the project would have significant impacts on regional resources. As such, she said staff did not believe that the project should be granted a DRI exemption,but rather that the Supply New' England project be reviewed as a DRI. She noted that if the Subcommittee reviewed Supply New England a DRI, it would be important to consider all the tests for an approval. Ms. Kadar asked about the relative transportation impact/benefit from moving the existing business from Route 28 to the proposed project site. Mr. Boesch said staff expected the original site on Route 28 to be rented to another company, so the transportation benefit from moving the plumbing supply company to the new Independence Drive site would be negligible. Ms. Frazer asked for clarification concerning Independence Drive's classification, since it connected to Route 132. Mr. Boesch said Independence Drive was classified as a regional roadway from the intersection of Route 132 to just before its last section. He said staff believed the last portion would eventually be classified as regional. Ms. Kadar asked for clarification relative to wetlands not providing a nitrogen loading credit. Mr. Michaud said the Applicant's nitrogen loading calculations reflect only the leased area, which was just under 3 ppm. He said the comment in the staff report was to highlight the issue of lowering the nitrogen impacts. Attorney Butler agreed that the nitrogen calculations reflected only the leased area. He said with the upland area on the rest of the site, it dropped to under 1 ppm. Mr. Michaud said that the calculation with the upland resulted in a concentration of just under 2 ppm. He said this was why the staff report had discussed using a composting toilet. Ms. Kadar said critical'issues for her were the wetland buffer and stormwater. Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 7 8 Attorney Butler questioned whether the impact to the wetland buffer was a significant impact to an environmental effect outside Barnstable. He noted the Applicant was cognizant of the wetland, and had tried to move development on the site. Attorney Butler said the Barnstable Conservation Commission had jurisdiction within the 100 foot buffer, and could issue a decision that ran with the land. Attorney Butler said the Subcommittee could determine that the issue did not rise to the level of such significant impact that the project needed to be a DRI. Ms. Kadar understood Attorney Butler's argument, but disagreed with it, saying that all wetlands needed protection, regardless of the Town in which they are located. She said wetlands protection was a Cape Cod (regional) issue. Attorney Butler noted the emergency shut-off for spills from the loading dock, and the vegetated swale. Mr. Ojala noted the 100 foot setback. He said the project could be modified to not have infiltration in the 100 foot wetland buffer. He said what was needed to do this was some re- grading. Mr. Ojala said the grass lined swale could be re-configured to a.smaller one. He noted there would still be re-grading just outside the 50 foot buffer line,but that it would be re-seeded. Attorney Butler suggested there were other ways to address the wetlands issues, such as looking off-site protections, cash contributions, or educational programs. Attorney Butler said these could be part of Site Plan Review or the Order of Conditions. Ms. Frazer asked if the Applicant's belief that the project was a less-intensive stormwater use was based on reduced parking, or differing with the staff's traffic generation figures. Attorney Butler.said no, the Department of Environmental Protection had a category called "commercially intensive parking" for the purposes of calculating stormwater pollution impacts. He said"intense" was like the Cape Cod Mall, not the Supply New England project. Mr. Michaud noted the vegetated swale as the project was proposed would treat relatively clean roof runoff, which could be directly infiltrated into groundwater. Mr. Michaud said staff was interested in seeing runoff from the parking area treated to a higher level. Ms. Garfield asked if the business was retail. Attorney Butler said he would not characterize it as such. Mr. Harris asked if the Applicant had now found a way to address Ms. Kadar's issue concerning the 100 wetland buffer. Mr. Ojala said the stormwater could be directed such as to infiltrate outside the 100 foot wetland buffer. Attorney Butler suggested the parking area could be moved further away from the wetland,but that the building and work limit would still be in the buffer. Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 8 9 Mr. Harris said if the Commission agreed to a reduced buffer zone, then other applicants could request a similarly smaller buffer. He was concerned about precedent. He also said he would like the Conservation Commission's opinion in writing. Attorney Butler said Mr. Gatewood, Barnstable's Conservation Administrator, had given the Applicant an informal read of a project that had not yet been acted on by the Conservation Commission. Mr. Gatewood had indicated a comfort level with the proposed project, but declined to put anything in writing,because he was the Conservation Administrator, but that it would be the Conservation Commission that had to act on an application. l Mr. Harris reiterated that it was important to get things in writing. Ms. Kadar asked for clarification regarding the intent of the Trust relative to a conservation restriction on the property. Attorney Butler said Mr. Cole was having discussions with the Town, the Barnstable Land Trust and Department of Wildlife and Fisheries to find the best method to place a conservation restriction on the property. He said Mr. Cole was obligated to maximize the value of the restriction to the benefit of the Trust. Public Comment Mr. Broadrick, Barnstable Planning Director, said the Town Manager's office supported the project. He noted the Cobb Trust's benefit to school children. Mr. Broadrick also noted the Town was in the process of re-zoning the area where the existing business was located. He said the hope was to re-zone it such that a non-supply-type business, with less retail impact, would go onto the vacated space on Route 28. Mr. Broadrick said the trips would therefore be transferred to the Industrial Park. Mr. Broadrick expressed confidence in Mr. Gatewood's ability to provide a preliminary reaction to a project by the Conservation Commission. Mr. Broadrick noted that the stormwater discharge could be moved out of the buffer. Mr. Cole,Trustee, Cobb Trust, described the history of the Trust. He noted that the Trust provided a variety of benefits to Barnstable school children, such as paying for enrichment trips. He characterized the project as a benign use of industrial land. Mr. Cole said he would like to see the back part of the site go to Fish and Wildlife,but that he had a duty to maximize the return to the Trust. Mr. Corcoran described his plumbing supply company. He said the proposed project would allow his company to keep a branch on Cape Cod. Otherwise,Mr. Corcoran said he would have to move 50 employees out of Barnstable County. Mr. Keller said there was a need for quality warehouse space on Cape Cod. He noted that Mr. Corcoran's lease at the present site on Route 28 was almost up. Mr. Keller said the project would have few impacts. Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 9 10 Mr. Frazer said she, and she believed also the Subcommittee,recognized the benefit of the Cobb Trust to Barnstable's school children. Mr. Virgilio said it was important for the Subcommittee to digest the information they had received. Attorney Butler addressed the zoning issues. He said the site could be used for retail, and a development less than 10,000 square feet in size. He said it was important to consider the monetary implications to the Cobb Trust of restricting the wetlands under a conservation restriction. Ms. Kadar noted some issues were not entirely resolved, and which needed to be addressed before the Subcommittee could come to a decision. Ms. Kadar said these included the issue of the conservation restriction and open space,hazardous materials, stormwater, and the overall building design. She noted the Subcommittee and staff had not had time to review information on the building design received before the hearing. Attorney Butler asked for comments on reducing the landscaped buffer versus reducing impacts to the wetland buffer. Ms. Kadar said she would like to see the results of such discussions and project changes. Mr. Harris asked how wide the landscaped buffer was. Attorney Butler and Mr. Ojala said they thought is was 30 feet. Mr. Virgilio said it was important to consider different configurations of the project to address the issues. Mr. Fox described the project time-line, given that the review involved both a DRI and a DRI j exemption request. Based on this, he said the Subcommittee needed to consider another meeting or hearing no later than September 12, 2005. He said the final hearing needed to be held before the full Commission no later than September 29, 2005, at least on the DRI exemption. Attorney Butler said he thought the Applicant and Commission staff could make headway on resolving issues. Mr. Hogan moved to continue the hearing and leave the record open to September 12, 2005 at 12:30 PM, at the Cape Cod Commission's office. Mr. Virgilio seconded the motion. The Subcommittee voted unanimously for the motion. Hearing#2 —Cape Cod Commission Office—,September 12,2005 Ms. Garfield opened the continued hearing at 12:30 PM. Ms. Garfield introduced the Subcommittee members, and asked the Cape Cod Commission (Commission) staff to present a report. Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 10 11 Attorney Wielgus reviewed the standard for granting a DRI exemption, Section 12(k) of the Commission Act. Attorney Wielgus said that the Subcommittee needed to make a finding that this proposed development, which literally qualifies as a DRI may, nonetheless,be exempted because it will have no significant impacts on the values and purposes specified in Section One of the Act outside of the municipality in which.it is proposed, due to its location, character and environmental impacts. Attorney Wielgus said it was important to define the term"significant impact." She said the Act's definition of a"DRI" helps in this case, in that a DRI is a development, because of its magnitude, or the magnitude of its impact on the natural or built environment is likely to present development issues significant to or affecting more than one municipality. She said when the.Subcommittee was deciding whether the project had any significant impacts or not, the Subcommittee needed to look at whether the project was significant to or affecting more than one municipality. Attorney Wielgus said that Section One of the Act also provided guidance on the purposes and values protected by the Commission. She noted that the Commission had been created to protect the unique region known as Cape Cod. Attorney Wielgus said Section One of the Act recognizes that the Cape's unique values would be irreparably damaged by uncoordinated uses and development. Because of this, she said the Act created the Cape Cod Commission to protect these unique values. Attorney Wielgus noted that the number one purpose in Section One of the Act was to further the conservation and preservation of natural, undeveloped areas, wildlife, flora and habitats for endangered species. Attorney Wielgus said it was important for the Subcommittee to consider if the proposed Supply New England project impacted anything significant to or affecting more than one municipality. She said that the Significant Natural Resources Area (SNRA) mapping indicated that there were natural,undeveloped areas, wildlife, flora and habitats for endangered species that were significant to or affecting more than one municipality. Attorney Wielgus noted all of the DRI exemptions indicated by Attorney Butler, save Infinium Software, were outside the SNRA area. She noted that the Infinium Software building existed in 1981, 10 years prior to the Commission Act. Attorney Wielgus also noted that the part of the project which was the subject of the DRI exemption was located outside of the SNRA area. Attorney Wielgus read from a description published by Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program (MNHP) which indicated Coastal Plain Ponds provide habitat for at least 43 rare plant and animal species, as well as state protected and globally restricted rare plants. She noted a prime Commission purpose was to protect wildlife, flora and habitats for endangered species such as these. She said this was a key distinction between the Supply New England project and the other DRI exemptions referred to by Attorney Butler. Attorney Wielgus said that NHL Skate fell in the Significant Natural Resources Area, but noted that it was reviewed as a DRI. She also noted that a Natural Resources Inventory had been done for the NHL Skate property, and that no rare species were found. Attorney Wielgus said there was a possibility,however, that there were rare and endangered species on the Supply New England site. She said the Commission did not know this—it was the Commission's obligation Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 11 12 to find this out. Attorney Wielgus suggested that the Commission needed to find out if rare species that were significant to or affecting more than one municipality were present on the Supply New England site. If rare species were present on the Supply New England site, this affected more than one municipality. Attorney Wielgus noted the Commission's charge also included protection of the public drinking water supply. She noted that the other projects that had received DRI exemptions were on sewer, which posed less of a potential impact to the public water supply. She noted that Hurricane Katrina's impact on New Orleans was a illustration of how municipalities were interconnected in terms of their economy and infrastructure. Attorney Wielgus noted that the Marine Water Recharge Area of Lewis Bay straddled the Barnstable/Yarmouth town line. She said this was a regional resource. Attorney Wielgus said transportation was also a regional issue. She noted the plumbing supply business would attract customers from the entire region, not just Barnstable. She said several regional roads would be impacted, including Independence Drive. In closing, Attorney Wielgus said the project's location, character and environmental effects did have significant impacts to Barnstable and other municipalities. She noted the location in the mapped rare species habitat. She noted the regional nature of the business—plumbing supply. Attorney Wielgus said it was also not possible to grant an exemption because the environmental impacts were unknown. She suggested that granting an exemption was not appropriate, but that there were other processes the Applicant could pursue. Ms. Adams noted that staff had received an E-mail from Ms. Kadar, an alternate, concerning the project. She said that Ms. Kadar could not be present at the continued hearing,but wanted to communicate her thoughts to the Subcommittee. Ms. Adams distributed a copy of the E-mail. Ms. Adams also noted that Commission staff had met with the applicant's representatives prior to the hearing. She noted that stormwater discharge was outside of the 100-foot wetland buffer. Ms. Frazer asked if any of the other exemptions in the area had encroached on wetlands. She noted that the Supply New England site being in a SNRA had answered her question. Mr. Ojala(Coastal Engineering) suggested that development of the LA-Z BOY project had encroached on wetland buffers. Attorney Butler noted all of the exemptions pointed out by Attorney Wielgus were in a Zone II area, with the exception of part of the Shepley Wood Products site. He agreed with Attorney Wielgus' presentation. The Subcommittee had to make a finding that the location, character and environmental affects prevent the project from having any significant impacts on the values and purposes protected by the Act outside of the municipality. He said the impacts have to occur outside,of the municipality, not just to a regional resource. Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 12 13 Attorney Butler noted the amount of wastewater flow described on his yellow handout. He noted these flows were going to Barnstable's wastewater treatment plant, which was located in the Wellhead Protection Area. Attorney Butler said the wetlands impacts are all within the Town of Barnstable. He said the Barnstable Conservation Commission would require a filing with the.Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program and an inventory. Attorney Butler.said Conservation Commission had to adopt any findings made by the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program. Attorney Butler said the Applicant had looked at whether the building could be moved. Attorney Butler said the parking area and roof runoff were removed from the 100 foot buffer. He said a vegetated swale had been added to the parking lot. Attorney Butler said the impacts had been reduced. On hazardous materials,Attorney Butler noted Barnstable had a stringent zoning bylaw which will apply to the project. He said the project will not be allowed to have hazardous materials in excess of household quantities. He distributed part of the decision of the Commission relating to the Country Lake Motel Change of Use, and requested that the Subcommittee ask Barnstable Site Plan Review to make a similar finding. Attorney Butler noted the yellow sheet he had distributed at the first hearing included traffic as an example of the types of impacts that were occurring. He said the Supply New England project compared to other uses where there were significant amounts of traffic,but that were not deemed to be significant from the perspective of having impacts outside of the municipality. On open space and the issue of a conservation restriction,he said it was uncertain if the applicant could go any further. Attorney Butler said if the exemption was granted, there was no requirement for a conservation restriction. Attorney Butler noted that the development of the Supply New England project would take place pretty much in a disturbed and cleared area, as well as being underneath a power-line easement. He said this was a relatively deminimus amount of disturbance. Mr. Ojala suggested development of the LA-Z BOY project affected a100 foot wetland buffer on the site. Attorney Butler said the question to be answered was will development in the particular project location cause a significant impact outside of Barnstable. Attorney Butler said that because the project was located in an industrial zone, the disturbed character of the land, and the minimal environmental effects of the project will prevent its having any significant impacts on the values and purposes outside of Barnstable. Mr. Hogan said the most difficult decisions he has had to make deal with exemptions, since these projects trip a threshold where regional interests lie. Mr. Hogan said based on the first hearing, he got the impression that there was a desire for the Subcommittee to discuss the project's Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 13 14 merits, rather than dealing with the narrower issue of impacts, and whether it should be exempt or reviewed as a DRI. He said the project had impacts. He suggested that the nature of the company itself was regional—it had branches in several Cape and off-Cape towns. Mr. Hogan said he felt.the impacts were regional, and justified reviewing it as a DRI. He expressed concern over the balance of the property. He said the property had regional impacts in terms of .wetlands, habitat and open space protection. Mr..Hogan said protecting the 9 acres behind the proposed development was key—it had to be more than an intent. Mr. Harris said it was important to consider whether the other projects that had received an exemption were on septic systems or on sewer. He said the 100 foot buffer should not be marginalized. He said it was also important to know that there was a firm commitment to protect the bulk of the property from development. He noted that making comparisons between the project site and the NHL Skate site in terms of natural resources was not useful give the distance between the two. Attorney Butler said many of the other projects were connected to sewer. He noted the sewer plant discharged to the same water resources area. Mr. Michaud said it was important to consider the level of treatment. He noted the sewer plant's effluent was treated to 10,ppm or better level for nitrogen. He said the Supply New England project would result in about 25 ppm based on state published numbers for denitrifying septic ,systems., Mr. Ojala suggested the project would have 15-16 people, and a very low wastewater flow. He suggested the applicant would attempt to connect to the sewer when it was possible to do so. Mr. Harris questioned whether the 100 foot wetland buffer was a concern. Attorney Butler said the Applicant had moved all the drainage outside of the 100 foot buffer. Attorney Butler said the Barnstable Conservation Commission could adequately address the concerns. He said that all of the work, except for a minor part of the parking lot, would be outside of the 50 foot buffer. He said the area between the 50 foot buffer line and the 100 foot buffer line would be revegetated. Ms. Frazer said she shared her colleagues desire to focus on.the exemption question. She said the Subcommittee needed to look to its own charge, as members of the Cape Cod Commission. She said that it may be thatBarnstable's Conservation Commission had a similar goal, but that this did not absolve the Commission members from their responsibilities in this and other areas. Attorney Butler said the question of a conservation restriction did not get reached until the Commission had made a determination that there were significant impacts outside the municipality. Attorney Butler said in order to approve the project, it seemed that the Applicant should file a Hardship Exemption. Attorney Butler suggested the Applicant could look at what else could be done to the site to.get everything completely outside the 100 foot buffer. He Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 14 15 suggested, however, that this might cause other problems, such as zoning issues, or by reducing the landscaping, which was another Commission concern. Ms. McElroy said that the site was mapped as rare species, and that it was one of the Cape Cod Commission's charges to address rare species. Ms. McElroy noted that in addition to being mapped as rare species habitat, the whole area was part of the Hyannis Coastal Plain Ponds Complex. She said that when the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program describes the habitat types, vegetation, rare plants and animals that might be found in these habitats,the Program uses this Coastal Plain Ponds Complex as an example. Public Comments Mr. Broadrick said that if the Subcommittee exempted the project from Commission review,he and his staff would attempt to work closely with Commission staff through the Site Plan Review process. In terms of additional drinking water wells considering the Potential Public Water Supply Area, he said he was not in a position to comment on this as yet. He said that if this was something the Town wanted to pursue, it would have to purchase the land from the Cobb Trust. Mr. Broadrick said it was not clear yet if the Town needed or wanted to use that land. He said there was no plan right now to use it,but there was no definite answer at this time. Mr. Fox said the hearing on the DRI exemption had to be closed by September 22,2005 and that the only date for a hearing by the full Commission on the exemption was September 29, 2005. He said the DRI timeframe was longer. Mr. Fox said the Subcommittee needed to decide the question today so that staff would have enough time to draft up a decision. Ms. Adams said the Subcommittee had heard from the Commission Counsel as to what the Commission's charge is in terms of an exemption. She suggested that if Commission members wanted to ensure that an issue was addressed,the most direct way to do it was through a decision with conditions. She said there were also other technical issues that were not addressed. Mr. Fox said that staff's point was that the Cape Cod Commission cannot place conditions on an exemption,but rather only a DRI or a Hardship Exemption. As such, Mr. Fox said the Subcommittee was trusting that local Site Plan Review would follow through,but that the Cape Cod Commission does not have control over this. Attorney Butler said that the Commission has allowed Barnstable Site Plan Review to implement conditions on past exemptions to address issues of concern. He said these conditions have been implemented, and the issues addressed. Mr. Fox said he did not think the Town ever done transportation mitigation through Site Plan Review. He said he had discussed this with Mr. Broadrick, and that Site Plan Review would be willing to attempt it. Mr. Fox said that this was something that should be more done through the Cape Cod Commission. He also said he did not remember open space being preserved through Site Plan Review. Mr. Fox said it was staff's perspective that these were issues that should be addressed through a DRI review. Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 15 16 Mr. Broadrick said Site Plan Review would be prepared to work with Commission staff to try to do the traffic mitigation and protect the rare species and open space through the Conservation Commission. Mr. Harris asked if Commission staff or the rest of the Subcommittee was in,agreement that the 100 foot buffer was not being breeched. Ms. Frazer, Ms. Hevenor and Ms. McElroy said no. Attorney Butler said the other exemptions in the area had had impacts that were not significant enough to create impacts outside of the municipality. Ms. Frazer moved to deny the exemption request. Mr. Hogan seconded the motion. r The Subcommittee voted unanimously to deny the exemption request. Mr. Harris asked what the next step was. Attorney Butler asked if the Subcommittee would reconsider its vote within the remaining timeline if the Applicant addressed the wetland buffer and open space issues. Mr. Harris said the RPP standards should not be breeched. He said, however, the applicant should be given every opportunity to address conformance with the standards. He expressed concern about impacts to the drinking water. Mr. Harris said the regional standards needed to be implemented. Attorney Butler said the applicant will try to look at the 2 or 3 major issues, including the wetlands buffers, open space and conservation restriction, and how to address them before the full Commission must vote on the project. Mr. Mumford noted that there were other regional issues that had not been discussed. Mr. Fox said the DRI exemption hearing should be continued to 9:00 AM on September 22, 2005 at the Commission's office where the intent would be to close it with a hearing officer. Attorney Butler said the applicant may want to file a Hardship Exemption application, or suggested that it might be possible to include it in the current review. Mr. Fox said the hearings had not been noticed for a Hardship Exemption. He also suggested that if something dramatically changed, that the Subcommittee might reconvene as a group on September 22, 2005, if possible. There was discussion of procedural matters. Consensus was to proceed with a continued hearing on the DRI exemption to 9:00 AM on September 22, 2005 at the Commission's office where the intent would be to close it with a hearing officer. There was also discussion of whether to hold a Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 16 17 Subcommittee meeting. Commission staff were directed to poll members on this after receipt of any additional information from the Applicant. Mr. Harris moved to continue the hearing on the DRI exemption to 9:00 AM on September 22, 2005 at the Commission's office where the intent would be to close it with a hearing officer. Mr. Harris also moved to continue the DRI hearing to 10:00 AM on October 11, 2005 at the Commission's office. Mr. Hogan seconded the motions. The Subcommittee voted unanimously for the motions. JURISDICTION The proposed Supply New England project qualifies as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) under Section 3(e) of the Enabling Regulations as amended, as "new construction of any building or buildings...with a Gross Floor Area greater than 10,000 square feet...". STANDARD OF REVIEW The Applicant has sought a complete exemption from Cape Cod Commission review of the project as a Development of Regional Impact pursuant to section 12(k) of the Cape Cod Commission Act("Act"). Section 12(k) of the Act,provides, in pertinent part: Any applicant may apply to the commission for an exemption from Commission review because the location, character and environmental effects of the development will prevent its having any significant impacts on the values and purposes protected by this act outside the municipality in which the development is to be located...The Commission shall make a finding whether a proposed development which literally qualifies as a development of regional impact may nonetheless be exempted from Commission review because it will have no significant impacts on the values and purposes specified in section one outside the municipality in which it is proposed due to its particular location, character and environmental effects. Chapter 716 of the Acts of 1989 and Chapter 2 of the Acts of 1990, as amended, Section 12(k). The values identified in Section One of the Act are as follows: The region commonly known as Cape Cod...possesses unique natural, coastal, scientific, historical, cultural, architectural, archaeological, recreational, and other values; there is a regional, state and national interest in protecting, preserving and enhancing these values; these values are being threatened and may be irreparably damaged by uncoordinated or inappropriate uses of the region's land and other resources. The purposes identified in Section One of the Act are. as follows: Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 17 18 The purpose of the Cape Cod Commission shall be to further: the conservation and preservation of natural undeveloped areas, wildlife, flora and habitats for endangered species; the preservation of coastal resources including aquaculture; the protection of groundwater, surface water and ocean water quality, as well as the other natural resources of Cape Cod;balanced economic growth; the provision of adequate capital facilities, including transportation, water supply and solid, sanitary and hazardous waste disposal facilities; the coordination of the provision of adequate capital facilities with the achievement of other goals; the development of an adequate supply of fair affordable housing; and the preservation of historical, cultural, archaeological, architectural and recreational values. The definition of Development of Regional Impact provides background of the definition of the phrase"significant impact". This definition provides: A development which, because of its magnitude or the magnitude of its impact on the natural or built environment,is likely to present development issues significant to or affecting more than one municipality. Section 7 of the Cape Cod Commission Enabling Regulations (as revised March 2005), which is entitled Developments of Regional Impact Exemptions requires that"the burden shall be on the Applicant to show that a project is exempt". FINDINGS The Commission has considered the exemption application of JDJ Housing Development, LLC for the proposed Project, and based on consideration of such application and upon the information presented at public hearings and submitted for the record, makes the following findings pursuant to Sections 12 (k) of the Act: . General Findings: G1. The proposed Project literally qualifies as a Development of Regional Impact because it is new construction of a building with a Gross Floor Area greater than 10,000 square feet. G2. The proposed Project is within a Significant Natural Resources Area that has been mapped for rare species habitat by the Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. It is also in the vicinity of the Hyannis Coastal Plain Ponds Complex. G3. It is a purpose of the Cape Cod Commission to: • protect groundwater, surface water and ocean water quality. • provide adequate Capital Facilities, including transportation and water supply. • further the conservation and preservation of natural undeveloped areas, wildlife, flora, and habitats for endangered plant and animal species. Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 18 19 G4. The proposed Project as described on plans entitled Site Development Plans, Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA-dated 1/12/05, by DownCape Engineering Inc., (five sheets plus cover page), and by Proposed Exterior Elevations, Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive,Barnstable MA—revision date 3/4/05, NDA Architects, plan A2.1 and by Proposed Floor Plan, Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA—revision date 3/4/05,NDA Architects,plan A2.1, where these plans, proposed exterior elevations and floor plan were received by the Commission on April 12, 2005, is a plumbing supply business including warehousing, contractor sales,retail sales, and showroom. The proposed development described on these plans and exterior elevations includes: .Main Building: 21,120 square foot warehouse 5,280 square foot retail/showroom area 26,400 Total gross floor area Additional: 9,100 square foot outdoor storage 41 parking spaces i G5. The proposed Project, as revised according to the latest plans received by the Commission on September 21, 2005, is a plumbing supply business including warehousing, contractor sales, retail sales, and showroom. The proposed development described on September 21, 2005 plans entitled Proposed Grading &Landscape Plan and Proposed Utilities Plan, (together on one large sheet), Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA—latest revision date 9/16/05, with green/orange color offsets,by DownCape Engineering Inc., shows a building with a footprint of 21,120 square feet, including 5,016 square feet of display area, and 3,800 square feet of outdoor storage. The proposed Project shown on these plans also includes parking spaces, the number of which is not shown on the plan. G6.The project site is currently zoned for Industrial/Limited. It is also located in a Growth Activity Center according to the Commission-certified Barnstable Local Comprehensive Plan. G7. The overall site consists of 12.80 acres of land in Hyannis,MA, within Independence Park.The proposed Project site is 3 leased acres of the larger parcel. The site is currently vacant, partially wooded with wetland areas. The site, including the area to be leased for the proposed Project, is also crossed by electrical transmission lines. G8. According to the application form, the proposed Project will require an Order of Conditions from the Barnstable Conservation Commission, and Barnstable Site Plan review. G9.This decision is based on the following plans as submitted by the Applicant. These include large and 11 x 17 inch versions: Site Development Plans, Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA— dated 1/12/05,by DownCape Engineering Inc., (five sheets plus cover page) Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 19 20 Site Development Plans, Supply New England,755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA —dated 1/12/05,by DownCape Engineering Inc., (five sheets plus cover page),revised 6/10/05 Site Development Plans, Supply New England,755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA— dated 1/12/05, by DownCape Engineering Inc.,(five sheets plus cover page), revised 9/7/05 Proposed Floor Plan, Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA— revision date 3/4/05,NDA Architects, plan Al.1 Proposed Exterior Elevations, Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA—revision date 3%4/05,NDA Architects, plan A2.1 Proposed Floor Plan, Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA— revision date 8/4/05, NDA Architects, plan A1.1,received by Commission on August 23, 2005 Proposed Exterior Elevations, Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA—revision date 8/4/05,NDA Architects, plan A2.1,received by Commission on August 23, 2005 Proposed Exterior Elevations, Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA—revision date 8/4/05,NDA Architects, plan A2.2,received by Commission on August 23, 2005 Proposed Grading &Landscape Plan and Proposed Utilities Plan, (together on one large sheet), Supply New England, 755 Independence Park Drive,Barnstable MA—latest revision date 9/16/05, with green/orange color offsets, by DownCape Engineering Inc. (received by Commission on September.21, 2005) G10. Submissions by the Applicant did not address impacts from the Project's size, location and character relating to conformance with the Massachusetts Hazardous Waste regulations, waste minimization,emergency response planning,building design, signage, exterior lighting and noise issues. Water Resource Findings: WRL The DRI exemption application is for construction of a warehouse and showroom in a leased area of 3.1-acre parcel totaling 12.80 acres. The proposal as described on plans entitled Site Development Plans, Supply New England,755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA— dated 1/12/05,by DownCape Engineering Inc., (five sheets plus cover page), and by Proposed Exterior Elevations, Supply New England,755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA— revision date 3/4/05, NDA Architects, plan A2.1 and by Proposed Floor Plan, Supply New. England, 755 Independence Park Drive, Barnstable MA—revision date 3/4/05,NDA Architects, plan A1.1, also included 42,440 square feet of pavement for parking and vehicle access. Plans were received by the Commission on September 16, 2005 and September.21, 2005 reflecting a quantified on the revised plans. reduced paved area, the size of which is not q p Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#.05009 September 29,2005 20 21 WR2. At the September 12, 2005 continued public hearing, the Applicant's engineer, Dan Ojala, stated that a municipal sewer connection was not available to the Project site. He also Project a allow the would Proj stated that it was unknown if or when the Town of Barnstable w o � municipal sewer connection. WR3. The Project site is located in a Wellhead Protection Area according to Regional Policy Plan Water Resources Classification Map I, upgradient of the Mary Dunn well field which supplies drinking water to Hyannis. The Hyannis water supply provides drinking water to a regional economic hub upon which areas outside the Town of Barnstable are dependent. The Hyannis water supply is therefore a regional resource likely to present development issues significant to or affecting more than one municipality. WR4.The Project is located in a Potential Public Water Supply Area according to Water Resources Classification Map I. If the Project was reviewed as a DRI, a 1-ppm nitrogen loading standard for Potential Public Water Supply Areas would apply. A nitrogen loading calculation submitted by the Applicant results in a 2.9 ppm nitrogen loading concentration in groundwater beneath the site and shows that the Project is unable to achieve a 1-ppm nitrogen loading concentration using a standard Title-5 septic system. Revised Project plans received by the Commission September 16, 2005 reflect changes in building and pavement layout. Revised nitrogen loading calculations were not submitted to reflect changes in impervious paved areas. However, the reduction in pavement will not bring the nitrogen loading concentration below 1 ppm. A September 16, 2005 Memo from Nutter,McClennen &Fish indicates that a composting toilet will be used. However, the Memo does not specify the type of composting toilet that will be used. In the absence of the permanent protection of upland areas in non-leased portions of the Project parcel, a waterless composting toilet would be necessary to bring the project's nitrogen loading to below 1 ppm. Barnstable Director of Planning Thomas Broadrick provided oral testimony at the September 12, 2005 continued public hearing indicating that the Town could not ensure that the parcel would not be used as a future water supply. Because the Project site is a Potential Future Public Water Supply Area to Hyannis, a regional economic center,the proposed Project would have significant impacts upon the protection of groundwater and provision of adequate Capital Facilities, including water supply; these impacts would be significant to and affecting more than one municipality. WRS. The Project is located in the Marine Water Recharge Area draining to Lewis Bay according to Water Resources Classification Map II. Lewis Bay and its watershed crosses both the Barnstable and Yarmouth town lines. Protection of the estuary is significant not only to Barnstable and Yarmouth, but also to Cape Cod as a region. WR6. The Massachusetts Stormwater Policy Guidelines provide for specific types of advanced treatment for drainage from areas with higher potential pollutant loads (e.g. fleet truck storage areas). The Project plans, including drainage plans received by the Commission on September Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 21 22 16, 2005, were used to determine Project water resources impacts. The drainage plan received by the Commission on September 16, 2005 indicates that a vegetated drainage swale incorporated into Project plans will capture runoff from approximately IN' of paved parking and driveway areas. The plan is inconsistent with the narrative submitted on September 16, 2005 indicating that the drainage swale receives drainage from all directions. It does not appear that the swale depicted on the revised Project plans is adequate to address stormwater treatment in accordance with the Massachusetts Stormwater Policy Guidelines, which require specific treatment of drainage with higher potential pollutant loads. The Supply New England site, as a warehouse for plumbing and bath supplies, is expected to have a delivery service, and may have. a fleet truck storage area. WR7. The specific information noted below was requested from the Applicant's Project engineer so that the significance of project impacts could be gauged. However, the information was not provided to the Commission: a) An exhibit of water-use information over a five-year period for comparable land uses to quantify expected wastewater flows and nitrogen loading; b) Details of the proposed composting toilet to gauge: the level of wastewater treatment, the characteristics of any wastewater,discharge at the site and the project's nitrogen loading; and c) Stormwater runoff calculations to assess the effectiveness of the proposed vegetated drainage swale. WR8. Based on the information received, the Commission cannot make a finding that the Project will have no significant impacts on the values and purposes protected by the Act outside of the municipality in which the development is proposed, due to its particular location, character and environmental effects. Hazardous Materials/Wastes Findings: HMW 1. Based on maps created for the 2002 (revised)Regional Policy Plan, the site is located in an existing Wellhead Protection District/Zone II area and a Potential Public Water Supply Area. Given Cape Cod's Sole Source Aquifer, drinking water is a regional resource. The application states that Supply New England keeps approximately 24 gallons of chemicals on hand. However, a May 27, 2005 Commission staff site visit to their Hyannis store indicated that Supply New England had at least 50 gallons of hazardous materials on hand, which is an amount in excess of the limit set by the Regional Policy Plan. For this reason, the Project will have significant impacts on the values and purposes protected by the Act, especially protection of groundwater, outside of Barnstable, due to its location, character and environmental effects. Natural Resources/Open Space Findings: NROS1. The first purpose of the Cape Cod Commission in Section One of the Act is to further the conservation and preservation of natural, undeveloped areas, wildlife, flora and habitats for endangered species. The 12.80 acre Project site is entirely located in a Significant Natural Resources Area as mapped by the Regional Policy Plan. The entire site has also been mapped by Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 22 23 the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program as a priority habitat site for rare plant and animal species. 3.1 acres of wetland are located throughout the central and southern portion of the site. NROS2. Section One of the Commission Act recognizes that there is a regional, state and national interest in protecting Cape Cod's unique natural values. NROS3. The Project site is located in the vicinity of the Hyannis Coastal Plain Pond Complex. Coastal plain pondshores have an abundance of State-protected and globally restricted rare plants. According to the Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, coastal plain pondshores and ponds can provide habitat for up to 43 rare animal and plant species. NROS4. The Applicant did not conduct a natural resources inventory (NRI) of the site or submit any other documentation demonstrating that development on the site would not impact rare plant or wildlife species. Because no NRI was conducted, the nature and value of the resources present could not be determined. For this reason,the Commission cannot make a finding that the Project will have no significant impacts on the habitats for endangered plant and animal species for which there are regional, state, and national interests in protecting outside of the municipality of Barnstable due to its particular location,character and environmental effects. NROS5.The RPP requires a minimum 100 foot undisturbed vegetated buffer area from wetlands to protect their natural functions. Clearing and grading activities, and the work limit area would occur inside the 100 foot buffer. NROS6. The Project, as proposed, would not result in permanent protection of sensitive resources on the site. NROS7. Because of the Project's location within the Significant Natural Resources Area mapped as rare species habitat, and the potential environmental effects to rare plant and animal species within the site, the Cape Cod Commission cannot make a finding that there are no significant impacts outside of Barnstable on the values and purposes specified by Section One of the Act, especially the purpose of furthering the conservation and protection of natural, undeveloped areas, wildlife, flora and habitat for endangered species. Transportation Findings: Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 23 24 T1. Based on the Institute of Transportation.Engineers Trip:Generation manual (7" ed.), the proposed Project would generate the following new traffic: AM ITE Peak PM Peak Total Use Code Size Units Hour Hour Weekday Warehousing(outdoor and indoor) 150 26,620 KSF 15 16 132 Building Materials and Lumber. (retail/showroom) 811 5,280 KSF 21 32 265 TOTAL 31.9 36 48.. 397 T2. Given the size, nature, and location of the proposed Project, as well as the limited number of such developments on Cape Cod, the development would attract traffic from outside the Town of Barnstable, affecting regional travel. T3. Development traffic traveling on regional roadways would impact trips with an origin, a destination, or both outside of Barnstable, affecting regional travel. T4. The development would impact the following regional roadways: • Independence Drive • Attucks Way • Kidds Hill Road • Mary Dunn Road • Route 6A • Route 132 T5. The development would have impacts on the regional intersection of Independence Drive and Route 132, affecting regional travel. This intersection has been identified as having a higher than statewide average crash rate. T6. The development would have impacts on the regional intersection of Mary Dunn Road and Route 6A, affecting regional travel. T7. The project would involve breaking the median on Independence Drive, contrary to access management principals. The turning traffic at the driveway/median break would affect regional traffic traveling to and from Route 132,Mary Dunn Road, and other sections of Independence Drive. T8. The Commission finds that there will be significant impacts to the purpose of provision of adequate Capital Facilities, including transportation outside of Barnstable, due to its location, and the character of the proposed business. CONCLUSION The Cape Cod Commission finds that the Applicant has not met its burden to show that the proposed Project is exemptC-Thpe Cod Commission hereby denies JDJ Housing Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 24 25 Develop;ErC, a'Development of_Regional Impact_exemption ffom the�terms-and ;* provisions of the Act,pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Act, c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended for the proposed Supply New England Project, located in Independence Park in Hyannis,MA,because the Applicant has not met its burden to show that the proposed Project, because of its location, character and environmental effects will prevent its having any significant impacts on the values and purposes protected by this Act outside the municipality in which the development is to be located.r-The Cape CbTComrnission concludes t11at there-wil �. significant-impacts-on-the values.and_purposes protecied_b_y h Act outside of the municipality of B stab-le`due-to-the-Pro'ect's-particular location;'character=and.environmental effects Alan Platt, Chair Date Cape Cod Commission COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Barnstable, ss /� , 2005 Before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared� 9G,4XI SLR T T , in his capacity as Chair of the Cape Cod Commission, whose name is signed on the preceding document, and such person acknowledged to me that he signed such document voluntarily for its stated purpose. The identity of.such person was proved to me through.satisfactory evidence of identification, which was personal knowledge of the un signed. Notary Public My Commission Expires: OFFICIAL SEAL tr DORR STEVEN FOX NOTARY PUBLIC - MASS. BARNSTABLE COUNTY . My Comm. Expires April 11, 2008 Denial Decision—Supply New England DRI Exemption#05009 September 29,2005 25 S� °F B 's CAPE COD COMMISSION 0 3225 MAIN STREET * P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 9SS 5 (508)362-3828 ACHU FAX(508)362 3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org TO: Town of Barnstable Town Clerk, Building Inspector,Town Planner, Planning Board, Conservation Commission, Board of Health, Board of Appeals, DRI Liaison, and Chief of Police FROM: Gail Hanley, Clerk of the Commission SUBJECT: Supply New England Development of Regional Impact Exemption Decision DATE: October 7, 2005 Enclosed please find a copy of the Supply New England Development of Regional. Impact Exemption Decision that was signed by the Cape Cod Commission on October 7, 2005. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. (0 t1 S _ •I r r � t� i �IME Town of Barnstable Assessing Division 'OrEo►na�:a 367 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Office: 508- -862 4022 Paul A.Matheson,III FAX: 508-862-4722 Director of Assessing ABUTTERS LIST CERTIFICATION March 28, 2065 RE: Subject Parcel—R332-010-002 As requested; I hereby certify the names and addresses as submitted on the attached sheet(s) as required under Sec 11, Ch 40A of the Massachusetts General.Laws. They appear on the most recent tax list with the mailing addresses supplied, excepting Parcel(s) R332-010-001 which was either missing or needed current ownership and/or mailing address information. 7 zt Sheila Fowler. Office Manager Qmalabuttasblwk.doc r- t . 16 of BA CAPE COD COMMISSION V 3225 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 (508)362-3828 SACHUS� FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org Fax and Certified Mail August 11,2005 Attorney Patrick Butler Nutter,McClennen&Fish 1523 Iyannough Road P.O.Box 1630 Hyannis,MA 02601-1630 RE: Supply New England,Independence Park(JDJHousing Development, LLQ Dear Pat: CE D x_Am'. g This letter is being sent to you as the designated contact for the above project. This project has been referred to the Cape Cod Commission(Commission)as a Development of Regional Impact(DRI)by John C. Klimm, Barnstable Town Manager, on August 9,2005. The Commission received the referral form on August 10, 2005. The project qualifies as a mandatory DRI project under Section.3(e)of Chapter A,Enabling Regulations Governing Review of Developments of Regional Impact,as amended. , Under the Cape Cod Commission Act,the Commission is required to schedule a public hearing within sixty (60)days of the receipt of a DRI referral. No municipal permits may be issued unless the Commission completes its review and issues a DRI approval. Commission staff is also aware that Nutter,McClennen& Fish has separately filed for consideration of the Supply New England project as a DRI Exemption. Commission staff believes the combined application is sufficiently complete to proceed to a substantive public hearing. As such,a hearing has been noticed for Tuesday,August 30,2005 beginning at 7:00 PM at the Assembly of Delegates Chamber,First District Courthouse,Barnstable. If you have any questions,please contact me at(508)362-3828. Sincerely, Andrea,Adams Planner/Hazardous Waste Specialist Cc(Certified Mail with copy of referral form): Thomas.Broadrick,Director of Planning and Community Preservation ARabin Giangregorio,Zoning& Site Plan Coordinator mas Perry,Barnstable Building Commissioner Linda Hutchenrider,Barnstable Town Clerk Robert Gatewood,Barnstable Conservation Agent f3 na/16/20h5 11:25 15087906230 BUILDING PAGE 02 Development of Regional Impact(DRI) Referral Form Please attach a copy of the original development permit application or site plan review, subdivision,or other application showing the date on which it was received by the Municipal Agency_ Receipt of this information via the U.S. Mail or delivered W1 person to the Cape Cod Commission constitutes a referral for purposes of Chapter 716 of the Acts of 1989,as amended. Referred by Town and Agency: Town of Barnstable Official Town Manager _/ Mandatory referral Discretionary Referral Limited Discretionary referral(please see back of this form) Project?dame Suoply New B Wand Project Proponent Name Joseph Keller GO A99=Pat Buser Address +755 Indeoendeasm Drive Barnstable MA 02630 Tel: (508)790-5407 Fax: (508)771-8079 Brief description of the project including,where applicable,gross floor area, lots,units,acres, and specific uses: T e�WHcant proposes do construct a 26,000 sf"rehouse including:a mezzanine wholesale showroom and 9100 sf of outdoor storage on 12.80 acres in the Industrial Park Project location:R332-010-002 The yMiect locus is addressed as 755 Independence DrivS on Town;of Barnsffible Cobb Trust property. The subject site is on the south side of 1,ndg� Drive rust west of the Nauset Workshm Mily alld the mterscction with Mary Dawn Road List of municipal agency(ies)before which a municipal development permit is pending- 0cam review licatia S 0 John C. Klimm, Date T Town Manager Forward to: Cape Cod Commission 3225 Main Street Barnstable,MA 02630 For Limited Discretlonary Referrals only: Municipal agencies may make limited discretionary referrals seeking Commission review of development proposals under one or more issue areas within the Cape Cod Commission Regional Policy Plan, asset forth below. If a limited discretionary referral is accepted for review, the JDJ HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LLC Supply New England 755 Independence Drive, Barnstable Application to the Cape Cod Commission for a Development of Regional Impact § 12(K) Exemption Submitted by: Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP April 2005 1418455.1 Nutter Eliza Cox Direct Line: 508-790-5431 Fax: 508-771-8079 E-mail: ecox@nutter.com April 12, 2005 #101433-9 By Hand Dorr Fox, Chief Regulatory Officer Cape Cod Commission 3225 Main Street P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 Re: JDJ Housing Development, LLC - 775 Independence Drive, Barnstable t �) Supply New England Dear Dorr: We are transmitting herewith the following materials filed on behalf of JDJ Housing Development, LLC for the construction of a Supply New England warehouse building to be located at the above-referenced location: 1. Application pursuant to Section 12K of the Cape Cod Commission Act; and 2. A Development of Regional Impact application form. In addition, the application binder contains supporting materials, plans and information regarding this project. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, copies of the enclosed will be filed with the Town of Barnstable. F sa. c r iD Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP ■ Attorneys at Law 1513 lyannough Road, P.O. Box 1630 ■ Hyannis, MA 02601-1630 ■ 508-790-5400 ■ Fax: 508-771-8079 ■ www.nutter.com f, Dorr Fox, Chief Regulatory Officer April 12, 2005 Page 2 Please contact us at your earliest convenience so that we may schedule a meeting to review the enclosed. Very truly yours, QXk ac k M. Butler Eliza Z. Cox EZC:cam Enclosure cc: Barnstable Town Clerk (w/enc.) 'Tom Perry=Bar-nsta-Mle Buildi-ng-:Cornmiss cner.::(w/enc.) Tom Broadrick, Barnstable Town Planner (w/enc.) JDJ Housing Development, LLC 1418637.1 JDJ HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LL C 755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE, BARNSTABLE Table of Contents A. Transmittal Correspondence B. Exemption Application Pursuant to Section 12(K) of the Cape Cod Commission Act C. Development of Regional Impact Application D. List of Project Plans E. Project Summary F. Certified Abutters List G. Section 12(K) Exemption Narrative • H. Filing Fee Calculation I. Massachusetts Historical Commission Application J. List of Exhibits 1. Portion of Barnstable Assessors Map 2. Notice of Lease 3. List of Permits/Approvals 4. Nitrogen Loading Analysis 5. Stormwater Management Plan 6. Economic/Employment Analysis 7. Traffic Impact Report 8. Hazardous Materials Information 9. Civil and Site Plans 10.Architectural Plans 1402512.1 0 � . 7 A 11J Nutter • Eliza Cox Direct Line: 508-790-5431 Fax: 508-771-8079 E-mail: ecox@nutter.com April 12, 2005 #101433=9 Via Certified Mail Brona Simon Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 Re: JDJ Housing Development, LLC - 775 Independence Drive, Barnstable Project Notification Form for Cape Cod Commission Filing Dear Ms. Simon: We are enclosing for your review a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) exemption application pursuant to Section 12K of the Cape Cod Commission Act (the "Act") as well as a • DRI application for the above-referenced project located at 775 Independence Drive, Barnstable, Massachusetts. This notice is being sent in accordance with Section 12 of the Act establishing the Cape Cod Commission, Chapter 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended. The Massachusetts Historical Commission project notification form is included in Tab I of the attached Cape Cod Commission application. A full project description is included in Tab E of the application materials and the civil and site plans are included in Tab J(9). Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions regarding this submittal. Very truly yours, (��6c Patr' k M. Butler Eliza Z. Cox EZC:cam Enclosure cc: JDJ Housing Development, LLC Cape Cod Commission 1418635.1 Nutter McClennen & Fish Lw P ■ Attorneys at Law 1513 lyannough Road, P.O. Box 1630 ■ Hyannis, MA 02601-1630 ■ 508-790-5400 ■ Fax: 508-771-8079 ■ www.nutter.com r MJ Nutter • Eliza Cox Direct Line: 508-790-5431 Fax: 508-771-8079 E-mail: ecox@nutter.com April 12, 2005 #101433-9 By Hand Dorr Fox, Chief Regulatory Officer Cape Cod Commission 3225 Main Street P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 Re: JDJ Housing Development, LLC - 775 Independence Drive, Barnstable Supply New England Dear Dorr: We are transmitting herewith the following materials filed on behalf of JDJ Housing • Development, LLC for the construction of a Supply New England warehouse building to be located at the above-referenced location: 1. Application pursuant to Section 12K of the Cape Cod Commission Act; and 2. A Development of Regional Impact application form. In addition, the application binder contains supporting materials, plans and information regarding this project. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, copies of the enclosed will be filed with the Town of Barnstable. • II Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP ■ Attorneys at Law 1513 lyannough Road, P.O. Box 1630 ■ Hyannis, MA 02601-1630 ■ 508-790-5400 ■ Fax: 508-771-8079 ■ www.nutter.com Dorr Fox Chief Regulatory Officer � Y April 12, 2005 Page 2 Please contact us at your earliest convenience so that we may schedule a meeting to review the enclosed. Very truly yours, JOE i aPat ick M. Butler , cfxe!::�) Eliza Z. Cox EZC:cam Enclosure cc: Barnstable Town Clerk (w/enc.) Tom Perry, Barnstable Building Commissioner (w/enc.) Tom Broadrick, Barnstable Town Planner (w/enc.) JDJ Housing Development, LLC • 1418637.1 B • � ' • `. • B i CAPE COD COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT EXEMPTION APPLICATION (Attach additional sheets if necessary) • An APPLICATION pursuant to section 12(k) of the Cape Cod Commission Act, chapter 716 of the Acts of 1989 (Act), as amended, for a DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT(DRI) EXEMPTION from Commission review of a proposed development which literally qualifies as a DRI but the location, character and environmental effects of the development will prevent its having any significant impacts on the values and purposes protected by the Act outside the municipality in which the development is to be located. General Information: 1. Applicant Name JDJ Housing Development, LLC Address: c/o Attorney Patrick Butler, Nutter McClennen&Fish, LLP P.O. Box 1630, Hyannis, MA Telephone Number(508) 790-5407 2. Project Name Supply New England Project Location: 755 Independence Drive, Barnstable 3. Brief Description of project including but not limited to: gross floor area, lots, units, acres, and specific uses. Applicant is leasing a portion of the 12.8 acre site and proposes to construct on the leased premises an approximately 26,000 sf warehouse with wholesale showroom with approximately 9,100 square feet of outdoor storage and associated parking, landscaping and infrastructure 4. Will this project be reviewed under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act(MEPA), M.G.L. c. 30 secs. 61-62H? If yes, provide status. • No 5. Provide a clear and concise statement of the reasons the project which literally qualifies as a DRI under Section 12(c)of the Act should nonetheless be exempted from Commission review. Attached additional sheets if necessary. Please see narrative submitted in application notebook. 6. Owners of Record. Provide the following information for all involved parcels(attach additional sheets if necessary): Deeds Owners Land Court Registry of Lot/Parcel Name Certificate of Title# or Book/Page# 332/10-2 Enoch T. Cobb Trust 4036/119 David B. Cole, Trustee • ' 1 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT EXEMPTION APPLICATION Attach the following additional materials • 1. Two copies of all documents and analysis supporting the request for a DRI Exemption showing that the location, character and environmental effects of the development will prevent its having any significant impacts on the values and purposes protected by the act outside the municipality in which the development is to be located and which the Applicant otherwise deems relevant to the Commission's decision. 2. Two copies of the application(s)for any development permit(s)filed with Municipal Agency(ies)together with two copies of: (1) documents supporting such application which the Application of Municipal Agency deems relevant to the Commission's DRI Exemption Decision; and(2) documentary evidence that such application was in fact filed, including the date of filing. 3. Enclose a filing fee of$200 plus fifty percent(50%) of the cost of a full DRI review in the form of a money order or certified check made payable to the Barnstable County Treasurer. 4. Certification that a copy of this application has been filed concurrently with the town clerk, the inspector of buildings, and the municipal agency(ies)before which a permit application is pending, in the town in which the proposed development is to be located. 5. Two(2)copies of the Development Plans (sheet size 24" x 36") drawn at a scale of I"=40' plus one copy of the development plan(s)reduced to fit on an 11" x 17" sheet. If the Plan requires more than one sheet, a cover sheet at the scale of 1"-200' showing the entire property shall be provided. 6. Certification that the subject property is legally and/or equitably owned by the Applicant. 7. A list of abutters to the proposed development which has been prepared by the Applicant and certified by the tax assessor of the municipality or municipalities in which the DRI or a portion thereof is located, including • owners of land directly opposite on any public or private street or way and owners of land located with 300 feet of any boundary of the proposed DRI. 8. (OPTIONAL)A suggested form of notice of the Commission public hearing on this application which fulfills the requirements of Section 5(e)of the Act regarding notice contents. 9. A fully, completed DRI Application Form(attached). I hereby certify that the answers contained in and information attached to this application form are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge, under penalty of the law. Patrick M. Butler&Eliza Cox Attorneys for Applicant v .C y l Applicant or Authorized Municipal Signaturep\.�Cc,(� r Representative Name(Please Print) Date of Signature The Commission will review your application and notify you by mail of your public hearing on this application upon a determination that this application is complete. You may also call the Commission Staff for the status of a pending application. Please direct any questions to the Cape Code Commission(508) 362-3828. Complete and return this application by hand-delivery or certified mail to: Clerk, Cape Code Commission, 3225 Main Street, Barnstable, MA 02630 • 1402714.1 c m r CAPE COD COMMISSION 3225 MAIN STREET • P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 (508) 362-3828 FAX (508) 362-3136 E-mail: 74260.3152@compuserve.com DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPLICATION FORM 10/9/97 Instructions: Applicants should contact the Commission's regulatory staff to set up a pre-application meeting. This scoping session provides an important opportunity for you to ask questions about the process and to reduce the chance of problems or delays. At the pre-application meeting the staff will review your application with you and discuss relevant issues. You should bring any plans, studies or information on the property and/or proposal to this meeting. Important Notes: Applications are reviewed for their consistency with the Act, the Regional Policy Plan, local regulations and local comprehensive plans once certified by the Cape Cod Commission. Applications need to document the project's consistency with the Regional Policy Plan's Minimum Performance Standards. Applicants are encouraged to demonstrate the project's benefits to the community and the region by meeting or exceeding the Regional Policy's Plan's Minimum Performance Standards and Other Development Review Policies. Copies of the Regional Policy Plan are available at the Commission's office. Providing a complete application including the required information and fees, will allow the Commission to act in a timely manner. This includes a certified list of abutters, in the correct form (see attached). Applicants may attach additional pages to this application if necessary. If there are more than 50 abutters, in addition to the • certified list, please provide three sets of the certified list on self-adhesive labels. Please note: Town assessors offices may take up to 10 days to certify an abutters list. If you have any questions or require assistance in completing this application form, please contact a member of the regulatory staff at the Cape Cod Commission office at(508) 362-3828. Section A: General Information 1. Project Name: Supply New England 2. Project Location(including Town):755 Independence Drive, Barnstable 3. Brief Description of the Project(including total square footage of proposed and existing development): The Applicant is leasing a portion of the 12.80 acre site and proposes to construct on the leased premises an approximately 26,000 square foot warehouse with wholesale showroom with approximately 9,100 square feet of outdoor storage and associated parking, landscaping and infrastructure. a. Total area of the project site: —3.1 acres acres. b. Estimated cost of construction: 4a. Applicant Name: JDJ Housing Development, LLC Address: Phone Number: ( ) • 4b. Co-Applicant Name(s): Address(es): i .} Phone Number(s): (Note: for wireless communication towers, a licensed carrier should be either an applicant or co-applicant.) • 5. Contact Person: Patrick M. Butler, Esq., Attorney for Applicant (If different from applicant) Address: Nutter, McClennen&Fish, LLP, P.O. Box 1630, Hyannis, MA 02601 Phone Number: (508)790-5407 6. Billable Entity: (If different from applicant) Address: Phone Number:_( ) 7. Owners of Record. Provide the following information for all involved parcels (attach additional sheets if necessary: Certificate of Title# Owner's Lot& or Reg. of Deeds Map/Parcel Name Plan Land Court Book/Page# 332/10-2 Enoch T. Cobb 4036/119 Trust 8. There are/are not (circle one) court claims, pending/completed, involving this property (if yes, please • attach relevant information). 9. List the Local, State or Federal Agencies from which permit or other actions have been/will be sought (not including MEPA): Agency Name Permit Date Town of Barnstable Building Permit Not yet filed Site Plan Review Approval Pending Barnstable Conservation Order of Conditions Not yet filed Commission 10. This project will/will not/may (circle one) require the filing of an Environmental Notification Form under the Massachusetts Environment Policy Act (MEPA). For information call the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs at (617) 727-5830. Please attach relevant MEPA documents. I hereby certify that all information provided in this application form and required attachments is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I agree to notify the Cape Cod Commission of any substantial changes in the information provided in this application, in writing, as soon as is practicable. I understand failure to provide the reqtPred information and fees may result in a procedural denial of my project. • Signature of Applicint or Legal Representative Date ,C Signature of Co-Applicant or Legal Representative Date • Signature of Owner(If different from applicant) Date Patrick M. Butler and Eliza Cox, Attorneys for Applicant (508)790-5407 Name and Address of Preparer(s)(If different from applicant) Phone# • • _r Addendum 2: Certified Abutters List 8/31/94 • 1402708 1.DOC • 1402708.1 • D • 0 J s � , • D JDJ HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LLC S 755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE, BARNSTABLE List of Project Plans Civil Plans: Set of plans entitled: "Site Development Plans Supply New England #755 Independence Drive, Barnstable, MA 02630" prepared by Down Cape Engineering, Inc., dated January 12, 2005, consisting of the following sheets: ➢ Existing Conditions Plan (sheet 1) ➢ Site Layout Plan (sheet 2) ➢ Proposed Utilities Plan (sheet 3) ➢ Detail Sheet (sheet 4) ➢ Sections Plan (sheet 5) Architectural Plans: Elevations and Floor Plan entitled: "Supply New England 755 Independence Drive Barnstable, MA 02630" prepared by NDA Architects Newbury Design Associates, dated revised on March 4, 2005, consisting of the following sheets: ➢ Proposed Floor Plan (sheet A1.1) ➢ Proposed Exterior Elevations (sheet A2.1) 1418253.1 • E o . � E i • JDJ HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LLC 755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE, BARNSTABLE Project Summary JDJ Housing Development, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company (hereinafter the "Applicant"), is the Lessee under a Lease for the property located at 755 Independence Drive in Barnstable (the "Property"). The Property is shown on Barnstable Assessor's Map 332 as Parcel 10-2 (see Exhibit (t)(1) attached hereto). The Applicant is proposing to lease just over 3 acres of the Property (the "Leased Premises"). The Property is located in the Industrial Limited zoning district as designated by the Town of Barnstable Zoning Map and is presently vacant. The Applicant proposes to construct an approximately 26,000 square foot warehouse with a wholesale display area on the Leased Premises which will be utilized by Supply New England, a heating and plumbing company with offices in Southeastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island. The proposed use is allowed by right under current zoning. In addition, the Applicant proposes approximately 9,100 square feet of outdoor storage, all of which will be demarcated by fencing. The Applicant is proposing 47 parking spaces, the minimum required by zoning, all of which are to be located to the side of the proposed structure. • The Property is located in the Independence Park, Hyannis Sand and Gravel Industrial Growth Activity Center as designated by the Barnstable Local Comprehensive Plan (the "LCP"). The LCP states that industrial activity centers should "provide for...warehousing....and limited commercial support facilities." As such, this proposal is consistent with the LCP and the Land Use Minimum Performance Standards (the "MPS") of the Regional Policy Plan (the "RPP"). The Applicant proposes installation of an underground septic system to support the proposed structure. Utilization of this system achieves a 2.92 parts per million nitrogen load which is consistent with the RPP. In addition, the Applicant has submitted a storm-water management plan that utilizes best management practices. As shown on the civil site plans included herein, the proposed development has been designed to be clustered toward Independence Drive in an attempt to minimize site disturbance, but still in compliance with zoning setback requirements. The proposed structure which consists of one floor with an upper mezzanine is designed to be architecturally consistent with its surrounding industrial neighborhood. The proposed parking area is situated behind a 50- foot front yard landscape buffer thereby minimizing visibility from the roadway. • 1418285.1 F • U U f } ' •� , f a { ' r F r i P r ARFCvC,fj"r, 71F'r1wS: IT5 MAR 4-3 P 1 -08 Eliza Cox Direct Line: 508-790-5431 Fax: 508-771-807.9 E-mail: ecox@nutter.com March 22, 2005 #101433-9 Assessor's Office Town of Barnstable 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Re: Request for Certified Abutters List Barnstable Assessor's Map 332, Parcel 10-2 (the "Subject Property") Dear Sir/Madam: This correspondence will serve to confirm that I have contacted Ben Anderson in the GIS Department to request that he prepare a map showing all properties located within 300 feet of the Subject Property together with a list indicating the names and addresses of those abutting property owners. After the map and list is completed, he will forward the same to your office for certification. Please certify to the Cape Cod Commission that the map and list represents a true and accurate list of all property owners within 300 feet of the Subject Property. Kindly contact me at the phone number listed above once the certification is complete and we will pick the same up from you at your office. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or comments regarding this request. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, Eliza Cox EZC:cam 1414634.1.. Nutter McCiennen & Fish LLa ■ Attorneys at Law 1513 lyannough Road, P.O. Box 1630 ■ Hyannis, MA 02601-1630 ■ 508-790-5400 ■ Fax: 508-771-8079 ■ www.nutter.com Parcels Within 300' of Map 332 Parcel 010-002 This list by itself does NOT constitute a certified list of abutters and is provided only as an aid to the determination of abutters. The requestor of this list is responsible for ensuring the correct notification of abutters. Owner and address data taken from the Town of Barnstable Assessor's database on 3/23/2005 Mappar Ownerl Owner2 Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip Country 313007 BARNSTABLE,COUNTY OF POLICE/TRAINING SCHOOL P O BOX 397 BARNS FABLE �MA �02630 USA 313001B00 BARNSTABLE,TOWN OF(ARP) %BARNSTABLE MUNICIPAL J480 HYANNIS MA �02601 USA AIRPORT BARNSTABLE RD,2ND FLR 314001 CARLETON,R T&STAFFORD,ET SOUTH FLINT ROCK RD REALTY 550 WILLOW ST W YARMOUTH MA 02673 TRS TRUST 314021 OTTAWAY NEWSPAPERS INC 319 MAIN ST HYANNIS MA 02601 USA -1 314026005 LORUSSO,L PAUL TR IND PARK CHAR REMAIN UNITRUST P O BOX 1776 HYANNIS MA �02601 314050 LORUSSO,L PAUL TR IND PARK CHAR REMAIN UNITRUST P O BOX 1716 HYANNIS MA �02601 314051 LORUSSO,L PAUL TR IND PARK CHAR REMAIN UNITRUST P O BOX 1776 HYANNIS IMA �02601 314052 LORUSSO,L PAUL TR IND PARK CHAR REMAIN UNITRUST P O BOX 1776 HYANNIS MA �02601 332010001 BARNSTABLE,TOWN OF(IvW 367 MAIN HYANNIS MA �02601 USA STREET 332010002 BARNSTABLE,TOWN OF(MUN) 367 MAIN HYANNIS MA �02601 USA STREET 332013 CORSON,RODNEY K&JANET TR RK CORSON PROPERTY TRUST 800 SEAVIEW OSTERVILLE MA �121 USA AVE ff477AU SET WORKSHOP INC PO BOX 1947 HYANNIS MA �02601 JUSA 332015 MASS,COMMONWEALTH OF DIV OF FISHERIES&WILDLIFE 100 BOSTON MA �02202 USA CAMBRIDGE STREET 347002 MASS,COMMONWEALTH OF DIV OF FISHERIES&WILDLIFE 1100 �BOSTON IMA �02114-2509 USA CAMBRIDGE STREET Thursday,March 24,2005 Page 1 of 1 MAP 332 PARCEL 010-002 it II 11V01\ � / 11f 1 I I1till I 1 ` t ll 11 � d ICI \ / ♦\ odd"ao� 1' i- +". i ill ., \ is oj9 & \ I1I O i I I\\ II . - ll1\Od II 1 1\,r III fit II I ,I i 1 V II II '9'f/ II I Ir o fd 11 `e II n d5a a p It it - a n I@ n II a u y 1 px Subject Parcel(s) ABUTTERS WITHIN 300' N O300'Buffer Around Subject Parcel(s) w E F] Abutters SCALE: V=300' *NOTE Planlmetrks,topography,and **NOTE:The parcel Imes are only graphic repreuntatlo- DATA! ATA SOURCES:Pianlmealcs(man-made features)were Interpreted from 1995 aerial photographs by The James vegetation were mapped to meet National of property baundades.They are not hue locations,and w.Sewall company..Topography and vegetation were Interpreted from 1989 aetlal photographs by GEOD Map Auvracy Standards at a scale of do not represent actual relatlonsNps to physical Objects Corporation.Planlmetrics,topography,and vegetation were mapped to meet National Map Accuracy standards 1'=100'. on the map. at a scale of 1'=I o0'.Parcel Wes were dlQOzed from FY2004 Town of Barnstable Assessor's tax maps. rovm or eawtsn°,r ras un Ir rropenyLocation: 770 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE MAP ID:332/010/001// Vision ID:28018 Account#408829 Bldg#: ,`FMS,.F ��l�'�" X `.krl. .'• � �y. at :: d (�.{� � 'T I3Z°.�--�� `�'� ,b�" LC .�� ��D .s.!,." F. ARNSTABLE,TOWN OF(MUN)W /O JDJ HOUSING DEVOLPMENT LI 20 SOUTH STREET YANNIS,MA 02601 S�TPLPMfTA 1� 'fl �;.ts dditional Owners: ther ID• Plan Ref. ax Dist. 100 Land Ct# er.Prop. #SR Life Estate DL 1 PARCEL A Notes: DL 2 GIS ID 28018 ASSOC PID# ' ;�R!✓�'D�b,Of��ii�11���5�,F�I1� -% r �:_': BKY�`L/�:9� SALDATL�'1u�v����ALF�PR�( ARNSTABLE,TOWN OF(MUN) P6839 Q L,S�M Year T e escri tion Amount Code escri tion Number NBHD/SUB NBHD NAME ISTREETfNDEX NAME TRACING CI05/A AND LEASED TO JDJ HOUSING DEV LLC Permit ID* Issue Date Type escn t:on Amount Insp.Date 4o Comp. Date(C B# Use Code escri lion Zone D Fronta e Depth Units Unit Price I Factor S.A. S.O 1 1300 ac Land MDL-00 IND 1 14 1.00 AC 170,000.00 1.00 5 1 1300 ac Land MDL-00 13.32 AC 25,500.00 0.55 R Total Card Land Units: 14.32 AC Parcel Total Land Area:14.32 AC • G • • • G • JDJ HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LLC 755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE, BARNSTABLE . Section 12(K) Exemption Narrative The construction and use of the proposed 26,000 square foot Supply New England warehouse as more particularly described in Tab E hereof will have no significant impacts outside the Town of Barnstable. The project is located in a Growth Activity Center as designated by the Town of Barnstable LCP and is allowed by right under local zoning. Accordingly this type of development is appropriate for the subject property. In addition, as described in Tabs J(4) and (5), the project as proposed will have no negative impacts on the groundwater resource and will fully comply with the Cape Cod Commission Regional Policy Plan nitrogen loading standards. The project will inure economic benefits to the Town of Barnstable, including a 100% increase in tax revenue and, due to the terms of the charitable trust ownership of the property, the lease revenue will benefit the public school children of the Town. As detailed in the transportation analysis provided in Tab J(7), the project will generate • only approximately 20 morning peak hour trips. As'indicated in the analysis, this low trip generation will not have any significant impacts on local traffic conditions. Based on the foregoing, the Applicant believes that the project is appropriate for consideration as an exemption under Section 12K of the Cape Cod Commission Act and the applicable provisions of the governing regulations. 1418634.1 �} • ` H • U • • • H • JDJ HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LLC 755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE, BARNSTABLE 1 Calculation of Cape Cod Commission Filing Fee DRI Fee under § 9(a)(i)(a)(ii) of the Administrative Regulations: New Construction: 26,000 sf 10,000 sf = 16,000 sf @a $0.50/sf Plus: Outdoor Storage Space: 9,100 sf - 10,000 sf = 0 sf @a $0.50/sf Total: $8,000 Plus Base Fee: + $10,000 Equals Full DRI Fee: $189000 Exemption Fee is 50% of Full DRI Fee under § 9(a)(i)(d) $18,000 x 50% TOTAL EXEMPTION FEE: $99000.00 1402489.1 _.5'r`•' t:' lra,.,. .,a ''' S',f'r'y ^s'r'c4J "k '� :Y 'R F';' f 'y •'_4 `m .::'•f :y f.-:.:,� ry .3 -e, '9 9 s. s '.S,- d 1 -�' .-�l.. {.^s��: j a ,^a, w;: c � f y .,:,i qv x'.'d:` > ��,.U:Sk� ,.`t. . c� a„' a✓e� ✓„tA E�' '�` °•'�,,:a`'rort r.''..5 ��; °1"f ar'M1,.: ,,ty. {.2{4M�PS a "4.'y�^5wb 1 `,,:;^'r + y �� "+yt �'^:,`.y t ,;`•s``"�'ti" ,,,'s r'�r' ,�`i. r�i- y\ rc-:•'`�� r �w`*t:�;:' 'w ':4,+$,ty'1.:/r..'4 r °' �:'a� ,+K sa 4 "r..'`y s.�w.,,^�"E:':; Y"°:F�:a'ya�'+°, ��F�b�','P,"�`" "� �'S, S,a d. s., y ',<' ,� � F *,sr�•^es?�`r k, .. w y IN ��++ �� .. �, `sa.j .. ��p� >. '��,t:: ,y `M1,., "1 'alb r ,�4�„✓'�,y x �..,,f"e V�„ y''sf`�ref � �'s" {Q�', �„�" n`?Y' ...r ti.✓'".,yt. t 'x{, d✓.L. \i7� T;'H• - }rE'. �y'.y,.'?:,t'°"'�,,y?'.?.';v,�' ,'r?r,1' ,wo, e,'s`fey'..,P`^y.>E'w'S.r.,rz .#�'w,". ^w'•,y! �,y w,a £'er'y,�� yaCr7 ,� F,"� ). '_�. r, �'%,P�t"S y:`.` '�'�e'ri..:`r1` �r s ;k�•\1.�, 4.. s`7 .„,. •s,.. +, e.+�,. \� t �^\. r t�> 4. �,iR ;.,,� ��.-..:'.a 1Fm .!:;°b �`'Y '.`` J '4 ',�� ,y� � r}% ,J 'iE�.-� • ^�a y"``p '�&6'.•� }`s^ ;�,r.I'* fs.�r' fr„�' �.. - •,.''f ;.".} r'r l�irrt t fir, '`�'y,` f Y.,,�t°YID :.-'ay.. �L gLi�s. y,\.a'.' .r .ti '!• ,�{'T,'„lfr^`�,f�`' "�,Iry^�.,r.;-�f`'4;1.-. er `" "`s._ '..J tJ'" Sj 4'>:�?', l:y ✓.l'..�. t ` s .fY" ,?\ ✓<4 f.., ``?.._. 1UT:DERBY.S.';R �` k '�4 , �l'_ r��. 1k /:� ` .. ,•': ., t :.IS�tJ5:ZOI /2L�0..,.. j ..t��rFiING„ Mi�NI Q2043 Sti !. 5 f'px't w.r It: 1 � / a t ;,l' '?''.'+. °•, ;�.r 'a `9." �.: ^g,f''- �/ `y 9 4 r '°i' ./''cif ��q.,{!.! '�` w .jl.�y 3 � .�.'a �ar'.�" .��^k +.,5,�.✓ r °, .+,° ��,4, /'e /' '.*r•¢ �4 �' .R! a��» .P "\`" a ".s, s�,. "s �t aM e''y a� f,{'e',"*y;r,•�s�;S 'S'``a.,j,tiro+' �:.:d.t.,�.-1.,a�,:..3.r�a w. ,,.yb� y,X r s Td.,F»y !y4. 0R.'"11;,.;R QF '.e3` <^.r'• a" a `. yq^+, r.�,`f��-,?::� y 's ,,r�`".s�-.:a � ;* r�"h:,"ran: r,`',r '/' a.r'.:�o,." •- `� a�°' -`',-",` s�t��^'%'' >'..of r' ;�'.''j�:�r`:4 't,`S. �•..�: S,;F.<`"�4 - ,.,, a "�� ",,"s�:,.. >d r''t",ti`a` '�.,_/r"'`'r Sa:+t` r%°`�`ir✓"`a"�1'.`'``.'! d'-,.:;�r C., T ±ts, ; 3' .,s ,y"gy,�`s<:^. `' ..'tilt �!s` , �c< �°^ � ' t� r a. � tr < 'y e '�� �»r�. ����(1 Si `s fj ."� t�i`{.•fj y;ls�',, '''�� � '!.��r- ,+�:-��,1f. ✓�. �.: ,des `�:- - Pf•4 f•�{,'y' , �'!�.`'if ry,s/♦�••F��'`,..,�.!`�,eT.. ,f�S/,t{�r �F ��''`\� ,S,•})�,��i�)�r"b",t`�`,l..`.^"a�-�4._(.p.,�.�1..'`� � �a "'y�„:�e',.�., 44 ✓F�:/}' }'.: q f �s. �,•l'�s,f b I�.., "G r.® �T S/�t"1; f+�''�k�:\!✓^4.xf,'V.'6 p�+,{'l�t��f�'�� S..t�y4 il r�l,� ��I ;'\�w. '. '.e.' -.y✓{>al,.v'- h�.,t' ' .+.'S..,., i4r 'Str` I?'.s. t. ''r,^',., � a`y . aE � � �, i„,;,�.T'',, "+y;. `:ti: ?�+, �-'`',. ° ''`4'^e t'y,,""•,.1.>sy�":�:°'���`" r'�, w, e S,s i 4 .,�"'v '� 4 /�c 1",,,..�, .`r. L .. ";r. S t ;',,?�`"V``a'"e ,� r ,S, � 1 s rr r ,` a',., ` .s.wy r`°t'''mw y i J,.�• ,•:,�+., } ?' d" s '� °y t,;. M r k * +,.^"'f ty**'. '- ti,`5:+'�, .,': fV`�t ti''•y^,.,>`.l`�`:.' "a,,r s`%°'iL+. ^4>•..S�E.,ti„Fe,s^"ti }'^.�f a, y4„m ";. � ,� a k.. ,?.w^r.r �,�'l.. r x '`� �` �a'a` sr'✓, '�y,`, `�,! "° rr,`'.^..,� `h,1t: 'r ,.t" a' e s .{;. .1' t, t`. •✓�, ! .r',�rya, 1''p°w� ,✓::� °� rr,?t"'�r,;^'' � .,,�1 t•,r+-;,'ti t'� ,�. "{�, � ;'"^y�i`,s`� '`'a -r 4'^..`�'�5.. �,,4. �,,�;+;,`'+.a yp� � .;.� ;t�i�)y.`^"s r'``� "�f�(`'�✓"♦`4 �.r��' ti,,�`(�/� +/ �✓4�'^�{?"`+�t"� �e�,`?�:.c\�/'^.,,;�> 4 �?'�,;.. $.tit''`^,. r'> a'. f 4'. ..za• r.,.,y ,t1ti`(.`^,s`�}.,,,..,5.:�a i,`;./'a�,`.r.I.f��`'}yt.}��.,'s!. �"ti'a'rft_*�.>`fy syi.t f'.%�.�.3"/�... �-:._°�'� N/' 4��,.t 4l% r f �s�r.�'az 5��::.#, a-....tJ�,{. .,\l � � � �..'...,t.<'._c.s,. ,�. ''.;''.tiL! '• t ,�� �=: '.� /. 4.r. ,'4F {'^.r.J.,._f <.x�.; ,- .\". 'f �f 9 '.:�? ` }f'2:,,z,�• } ;, d ,.2,�?,... �..l,wti �> t i ,,� ct .r✓. 'xl� .°i 'a�,±' f .': .,� .�. .1.: <<. ,r S.'r. ✓. .S ,r','i:" \ -.\:.:'. .4:xr.w.. ;i., «'i;. .r"- s,P`.,`*. s^. .`,. •:'4 f, ,-'\ ,/',w. � •.„r`�.5,.-., S, ...r `",,. t. -"0. _P "�r"t'^;,," �.",«;"ro•o+'M_t n„_"�v�`„r° Sr,y`y „° Y.... .. • • �; o i • .. •. • 3 J • Addendum 3: MHC Project Notification Form 8/31/94 MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSIO N 220 Morrissey Blvd. Boston, MA 02125 PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM Project Name: Supply New England Location/Address: 755 Independence Drive City/Town: Barnstable Project Proponent Name: JDJ Housing Development, LLC Address: c/o Patrick M. Butler, Esq., Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP, P.O. Box 1630 City/Town: Hyannis, MA 02601 Telephone #: (508) 790-5407 Agency license or funding for the project (list all licenses, permits, approvals, grants or other entitlements being sought from state and federal agencies). Agency Name: Type of License or Funding (specify) Cape Cod Commission DRI or DRI Exemption Approval Project Description (narrative): Applicant proposes to lease a portion of the 12.8 acre site and to construct on the leased premises an approximately 26,000 square foot warehouse with wholesale showroom, approximately 9,100 square foot outdoor storage and associated parking, landscaping and associated infrastructure.. Does the project include demolition? No If so, specify nature of demolition and describe the building(s) which are proposed for demolition. Does the project include rehabilitation of any existing building? No If so, specify nature of rehabilitation and describe the building(s) which are proposed for rehabilitation. • i Does the project include new construction? Yes If so, describe (attach plans and elevations if necessary). Proposed structure will have a footprint of approximately 21,120 sf site and elevation plans are included in application notebook. To the best of your knowledge, are any historic or archaeological properties known to exist within the project's area of potential impact? No If so, specify. What is the acreage of the proposed new construction? —3 acres The Applicant proposes to lease just over 3 acres of the 12.80 acres of land. Proposed building will have a footprint of 21,120 sf. What is the present land use of the project area? Vacant, with a utility easement running through portion of site. What has been the previous land use of the project area? See above. Please attach a copy of the section of the USGS quadrangle map which clearly marks the project location. This Project Notification Form has been submitted to the MHC in compliance with 950 CMR 71.PO. YM,20 2� Signature of Person ubmitting this form Date Name: Patrick M. Butler and Eliza Cox, Attorneys for Applicant Address: Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP, P.O. Box 1630 City/Town: Hyannis, MA 02601 Telephone: (508) 790-5407 REGULATORY AUTHORITY 930 CMR 71.00 M.G.L. c. 9, ss. 26-27C as amended by St. 1988. c. 254 1402712.1 J J ., 0 • • • I � i �j '� C098 L,ot' �'� L•L� . 2.21 AC I I . ti< 2,43Ar— I 1 MAtKN�H W V 14 < i 3.00ac I 4. I - 7 7brAL ` 5.00AG I Sium I . co" i for• - I i M•347-2 g IS3S I I ( M-313-0.300 � (M•�D'1-S� ' TOWN OF BARNSTAHLF F eAreNsr�s�e < WAftR C.O. \ I 4 I 11t0 Won THE CMIUT" Or T" \' I6 O � SAIMSTAi1�E MOAno w Aewg*o11M \ ,q . . 96 4 .`.. . AOS AIRMAP INC. \\ MASSACMUKTTf �MNECnCaIlT Town of BartistableL Assessor's Map ,332, Lot 10-2f Fl> • 2 0 U • • � , • • ' 2 JDJ HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LLC .755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE BARNSTABLE NOTICE OF LEASE TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER 1418259.1 • 3 • 0 U U • • 1 • • � .3 JDJ HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LLC 755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE, BARNSTABLE List of Required Project Permits/Approvals Cape Cod Commission DRI Approval or Exemption Town of Barnstable Building Department Site Plan Review Approval Building Permit Town of Barnstable Conservation Commission Order of Conditions 1402501.1 • • 0 • • t • 4 • NON-RESIDENTIAL NO3-N LOADING 4/11/2005 PROJECT: 755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE-SUPPLY NEW ENGLAND TOWN: BARNSTABLE,MA Title V Wastewater Flow = 379 gpd ASSUMED VALUES Impervious Recharge Rate = 40 in/yr Total Land Area= 134682 ft2 Roof Runoff Concentration 0.75 mg/L Road Runoff Concentration 1.50 mg/L Paved Area = 42440 ft2 Lawn Nitrogen Leaching= 25 % Roof Area = 21120 ft2 Wastewater Concentration = 35 mg/L Lawn Area =(est.) 6000 ft2 Average Lawn Size = 5000 ft2 Natural Area = 65122 ft2 Recharge Rate = 18 in/yr Nitrogen Application Rate 3 lbs/1000ft2 CALCULATIONS Title V Wastewater Loading 50208.03 mg Title V Wastewater Recharge 1434.52 liters Total Impervious Loading 20561.10 mg Roof Loading 4096.70 mg Roof Recharge 5462.27 liters Paved Loading 16464.39 mg Paved Recharge 10976.26 liters Lawn Loading 5597.26 mg Natural Area Recharge 8277.43 - liters Title V Total Loading 76366.38 mg Title V Total Recharge 26150.48 liters TITLE V NITROGEN LOADING CONCENTRATION= 2.92 ppm 27.87 kg/yr 9.02 kg/acre/yr • J • 0 U U • • • 5 • • STORMWATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN: Supply New England Site 755 Independence Drive, Barnstable, MA Date: 4/11/05 prepared by: down cape engineering,inc. 939 Rt.6a Yarmouthport,MA 1-508-362-4541 phone 1-508-362-9880 fax • STORMWATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN: For 755 Independence Drive, Barnstable, MA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Overview of Stormwater Management System 2. Owner of Stormwater System and Responsible Party for Operation and Maintenance 3. Source Control Best Management Practices 4. Schedule of Inspection and Maintenance of System 5. Emergency Spill Contingency Plan • I STORMWATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN: For 755 Independence Drive, Barnstable, MA OWNER OF STORMWATER SYSTEM AND RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE: OWNER: Town of Barnstable Cobb Trust c/o Atty.David B.Cole Sykes&Cole Attys. 420 South Street P.O.Box 1358 Hyannis,MA 02601 • Phone: 1-508-775-9147 Fax: 1-508-775-5682 RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Supply New England,Inc. 755 Independence Drive Barnstable,MA 02630 Tel: 508.775.5818 Fax: 508.790.0908 www.supplynewengland.com • • _STORMWATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN: For 755 Independence Drive,Barnstable,MA OVERVIEW OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: The drainage systems specified for proposed Supply New England building have been designed in accordance with Town of Barnstable Subdivision rules and regulations. The system utilizes deep sump hooded catch basins,solid conveyance piping,and leaching trenches and pits to contain and infiltrate a 25 year event and provide the required Total Suspended Solids(TSS) removal mandated by the State Stormwater Management Guidelines. The stormwater systems in the loading zone area will be designed to contain a valve which can be closed in event of a hazardous material spill. Best_Management Practices incorporated in the project are as follows: -Deep Sump and Hooded Catch Basins (25%TSS Removal) -Infiltration Trenches/Pit (80%TSS Removal) • -Street Sweeping (10%TSS Removal) • • STORMWATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN: For 755 Independence Drive, Barnstable,MA SCHEDULE OF INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: SCHEDULE OF INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE: The stormwater management system proposed for the site requires regular inspection and maintenance to ensure proper operation and effectiveness. 1. It is recommended that the stormwater system proposed for the site be inspected annually, and sediment removed from the catch basins annually or when the sediment rises to within 24"of the outlet snorkel,whichever is sooner. The inspection shall involve physically measuring the sediment depth in the catch basins of each system and inspecting the manholes of the leaching galleys for solids carryover. If significant solids carryover is encountered,the leaching basin • solids silt shall be removed and more frequent primary catch basin cleaning shall be scheduled as required to prevent solids carryover. 2.The proper operation of the shut off valve in the loading area shall be verified annually. 3. The parking areas shall be swept free of sand after the last snowfall of each season. • 0 • STORMWATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN: For 755 Independence Drive,Barnstable, MA SOURCE CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: 1. A Spill Response Kit shall be stored and maintained in the materials management building adjacent the loading zone.Lab Safety Supply-Oilup Sorbent®31 Gallon Spill Response Kit or equal and Two SpillmagnetTM 24"x24"drain covers shall be stored with the emergency spill response kit.Kits and refills are available from Lab Safety Supply(1-800-356-0783). Personnel should be instructed in the proper use of the above listed equipment. 2. The pavement should be swept after the last snowfall of the season and when necessary to remove accumulated debris. 3. A six inch gate valves will be provided in the loading area which can be closed to prevent I hazardous materials from entering the infiltration system.This valve shall be closed immediately upon discovery of any hazardous spill. Personnel should be instructed in the proper use of the valve. • • STORMWATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN: For 755 Independence Drive,Barnstable, MA EMERGENCY SPILL CLEANUP PLANS: 1. The owner of the facility shall have a designated person with overall responsibility for spill response cleanup. 2. Key personnel shall be trained in the use of this plan and spill containment and cleanup methods. All employees should have basic knowledge of spill control procedures. 3. A summary of this plan shall be posted in a prominent location in the building. The Summary shall identify the spill cleanup coordinators,location of cleanup kit,and phone numbers of regulatory agencies and individuals to be contacted in the event of a spill. 4. In the event of a spill,the following shall be notified: a) Barnstable Fire Department 1-508-362-3312 (for a gasoline or hazardous materials spill) (or 911) b) Department of Environmental Protection Emergency Response 1-508-946-2850 c) Barnstable Board of Health 1-508-862-4644 5. The cleanup of spills shall begin immediately. 6. An emergency spill containment and cleanup kit shall be stored and maintained on site. The kit shall be stored in a manner that allows rapid access and use by employees. A Spill Lab Safety Supply-Oilup Sorbent®31 Gallon Spill Response Kit or equal and Two SpillmagnetTM 24"x24"drain covers shall be stored with the emergency spill response and containment kit. Kits and refills are available from Lab Safety Supply(1-800-356-0783). 7. If the spill is in the loading zone area,close the valve on the catch basin outlet to prevent infiltration of hazardous materials into the ground. The valve covers shall be painted white and kept free of snow and debris at all times. 8. The emergency spill cleanup plan shall be updated regularly. • _ 6 • 0 s 6 JDJ HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LLC 755 INDEPENDENCE DRI VE, BARNSTABLE Economic Analysis Development of the subject property will inure many economic benefits to the Town of Barnstable. The property is owned by David B. Cole, Trustee under the will of Enoch T. Cobb, which operates as a public charitable trust pursuant to a cy pres plan adopted, with the approval of the Attorney General, by the Probate and Family Court Department pursuant to an Equity Judgment dated January 18, 1982, as amended. In accordance with said a Ares plan and the testator's intent in creating the trust, the rental stream generated by the lease of the premises to the Applicant will enable the Trustee to provide significant financial benefits to the Barnstable public school students who are the beneficiaries of the trust. In addition, the lease arrangements will benefit the Town of Barnstable by generating tax revenues to the Town. Presently, because the property is tax-exempt and therefore generates no revenue to the Town. In fiscal year 2005, the land had an assessed value of $1,643,500. After the development, it is anticipated that the building will be assessed at approximately $1,450,000.00. The 2005 Town of Barnstable tax rate is $6.05 per thousand, excluding land bank and fire district taxes. As such, after the development of the property as • proposed, the Town will realize a net gain of$11,260.00 in tax revenue'. This represents a 100% increase over the taxes currently generated by this property to the Town. Supply New England, which presently operates in Hyannis, employs a staff of between 12-15 employees. It is not anticipated that this project will result in the hiring of any additional employees. Supply New England offers full benefits to employees. In terms of supporting the local economy, the Applicant will utilize local subcontractors to the greatest extent feasible during the construction process. In addition, the Applicant has selected Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP and Down Cape Engineering, Inc., two local firms, for representation during the permitting process. Further, many local heating and plumbing subcontractors purchase their supplies from Supply New England. As such, the proposed use will support local businesses and workers. 1418384.1 • ' Based on the Leased Premises being approximately one-quarter of the entire site. • 7 x • • • S • r, 7 • � r Abend Associates Tra# & Transportation Planning Services January 25,2005 Mr.John Shields Realty Advisors 683 Main Street Osterville,MA 02655 RE: #755 Independence Drive,Barnstable,Massachusetts Dear John: I have considered the traffic aspects of the warehouse facility proposed for the above address in Barnstable, Massachusetts. The proposal calls for a 26,000 square foot warehouse that will include a 5,000 square foot showroom. Access will include two driveways, one inbound and one outbound along the eastbound side of Independence Drive. This letter presents trip generation projections for the facility along with a brief review of the access design to confirm that the construction of the warehouse will not result in a significant impact on local traffic conditions. Trip Generation Projecting vehicle trips to and from the project is done with the aid of the rates and equations included in the publication Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE),2003, 7a' edition. This facility falls into Land Use Category 4150, Warehouse. I have attached the relevant pages of the publication to this letter. The showroom is not so easily categorized, While it is technically retail space the fact that it is so specialized limits its market and thereby limits the number of"shoppers". Thus, the choice of the exact method is worth discussing. One possibility is to consider the showroom an extension of the warehouse space and apply the ITE rates/equations for Warehouse to the entire 26,000 square feet. A second alternative is to select a laud use category that best fits the proposed showroom. In my opinion, considering the character of the space, the type of product, and the location (in a non-retail area), the showroom portion of the facility will mirror the trip activity one might find at a Furniture Store, Land Use Category #890. This type of store has a narrow product line, a similar market (basically hone furnishings), and has trips that are often not connected to errands or other, typical day-to-day shopping patterns. Exhibit 1 presents trip projections based on both alternatives. As it turns out,the alternative that does not distinguish between the two types of land uses results in the higher number of potential trips. These amount to 144 trips in and 144 trips out on an average day. Also, there can be expected to be only 22 morning peak hour trips and only 18 evening peak hour trips to or from the site. These flows reflect a peak rate of about one vehicle in or out every 3 minutes. Such an increase will not result in a significant impact on local traffic conditions. Note that these volumes include both entering and exiting vehicles. 265 Winn Street, Burlington, Massachusetts 01603.2616 /.�../1 Z0 'd 6906 UZ 19L 'ON XVd salei�ossd puagy Wd 90:10 NOW SOH-RAW #755Independence Drive i Barnstable,Massaoliusetts January 25,2005 -2- Site cress The access will include a one-way inbound drive and a one-way outbound drive. Independence Drive includes two travel lanes in each direction separated by a wide planted median. This median results in most driveways being right turn only. This restriction results ifi very smooth and safe operations. The proposed facility is located along a straight segment of Independence Drive so that visibility for drivers entering or exiting the street is excellent. There is currently a residential development proposed across from the site, with the proposed driveway directly across from the driveway for this facility. It is unclear exactly what access restrictions will be placed on this exit driveway since it will be aligned with the median opening for that residential driveway. At this time I am unsure whether or not the proposed median opening can be used for left turns out of this site. Alternatively, traf ftc exiting this site that wishes to travel west(toward the Route 132 corridor)would have to reverse direction by making a u-turn at the Mary Dunn Road intersection. It is my opinion that this median opening could be designed to accommodate this movement. Regardless,the town of Barnstable will determine the restrictions on movements here as part of their approval process. Summary In summary, this letter provides a brief review of the traffic aspects of the proposed warehouse facility at #755 Independence Drive in Barnstable, Massachusetts. It is expected that traffic flows will be less that 150 vehicles entering and exiting on an average daily basis with peak volumes of only about I car every three minutes. The site access will include two driveways, one inbound and one outbound. There is the potential to allow left turns out of the site since there is a residential driveway being constructed directly opposite the exit that will have a median break as part of its access design. The determination of whether or not left turns are allowed here is the purview of the town boards and departments. It is my opinion that the site will operate safely regardless of their decision, Finally, it is nay professional opinion that there will be no significant impact on traffic conditions in the area or along area roadways as a result of this project and its small number of vehicle trips. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Michael R.Abend. MRA/amc '"62a"M",""C Warchou" Abend Associates Co 'd E90£ £LZ 18L 'ON Xdd saleioossy puagy Wd 80:10 NOW 500Z-8Z—M s r A Trip Generation Projections 755 Independence Drive,Barnstable Vehicle Trips Peak Hour Trips(iva&out) Weekday Morn mg Evening Trips Alternative 1: 26,136 SF Warehouse 22 18 288 (ITE land use 4150 Total : 22 18 288 ,Alternative 2: a, 21,120 SF Warehouse 19 15 233 (ITE land use 4150) b. 5,016 SF Showroom 1 2 25 (ITE land use#890) Total: 20 17 258 Furniture Store used as surrogate land use. Source: rM Trig Generation.7th Edition,2003 Abend Associates saleioossy puagd Wd M 'd £90£ £LZ 18L 'ON Xdd 80:10 NOW 900Z-8Z—M • • 0 • 8 • JDJ HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LLC 755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE, BARNSTABLE Description of Hazardous Materials Supply New England distri butes local plumbing and heating contractors with needed supplies. The only hazardous materials that are sold on a year-round basis include a case (or 15 gallons) of PVC glue which is sold as individually packaged quarts. In the winter-time, Supply New England also distributes one-gallon containers of antifreeze which are utilized in residential home heating systems. The foregoing are the only hazardous chemicals sold or distributed by Supply New England. Finally, it should be noted that Supply New England's current location on Route 28 in Hyannis is also located within a Wellhead Protection Area (as designated by the Town of Barnstable Zoning Map) and accordingly, this proposal simply represents a relocation of the business and does not introduce any new hazardous materials and/or chemicals to a Wellhead Protection Area. As such, this relocation has no significant impacts in terms of hazardous materials outside of the Town of Barnstable. • 1420641.1 i • • ram_-_ 9 • • 0 U U • • 9 • SITE DEVELOPMENT -PL, S Formerly R.B.Corcoran P.O. Box 370 Rt. 28 349 lyanough Road .SUPPLY NEW ENG.-L.,r�-, D Hyannis, MA 02601 #755 INPEPENDENCE DRIVK LARNSTABLE, A11A 021-630 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS SUPPLY NEW ENGLAND #755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE BARNSTABLE MA 02630 DATE : 01/12/05 -N� N APPLICANT: JOSEPH P.KELLER 843 C.MAIN STREET OSTERVILLE,IIIA 02655 P "H. 1-508-428-4323 . CIVIL ENGINEERING: DOWN CAPE ENGINEERING,INC. ARNE,H.OJALA PLS,PE DANIEL A::OJALA PLS.)EIT 9391MAIN'STREET YARMOUTHPORT,MA 02675 PH. 1-508=362-d541 FAX 1-508-362-9880 LEGAL: PATRICK M..BUTLER ESO •' NUTTER McCLENNEN& SH LLP P.O.ROX-1630.. Ofl-338 B .. HYANNIS,MA 02601 PH. 1-5b8-790=5407 FAX: 1=508-771-8 I X 66.7 66.5 X -now I / I arAfi ' ,,,ly, 100'TP NATF� 974 LO I ! X 68.3 (N EPENDENCE DRIB m W47 ! q (,�QWN EAS ON 1 I PT:f7 9 PG. p C�. 4036 1 9 m I ! Tnm I , LOT 3B 6D Aeo=111.996 aa.ftl 5a 2.67 Arrest I n •° GENERAL NOTES: 1.THE LOCATION OF EOSTINO UNDERGROUND UTUnES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS APPROXIMATE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION ON THIS SRE,THE EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE REQUIRED 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION TO 010 SAFE (i L:M t 11-7233)AND ANY OTHER UTILITIES WHICH MAY HAVE CABLE..PIPE OR - UIPNENT IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA FOR VERIFICATION OF LOCATIONS. ^ T aT,eBI 2 ALL In MATERIALS.COMPONENTS AND METHODS EMPLOYED ON THIS a --J.9 PROJECT WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE TOWN OF BARNSTABLE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ANDIOR THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD -74 1 74•-_.�- 1 SPECDTCAMM FOR BWDGES AND MOMAYS AS AMENDED TO PRESENT. W 72 ALL SEPTIC WORK AND MATERMT TO CONFORM TO 310 CMR 15.00 VILE 5. AND BARNSTABLE HEALTH REGULATIONS. --72 70�,�- J.ALL nmLROOF DATUM L9 NGVD29 w I.��` «' ; 88 IC ExdIPGG m m I & I 4.ALL RWF Ri1NOff TO BE PIPED TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM.COORDINATE DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS l� 1 m WITH ARCHOECT.ROOF DRAINS B'0SCH4O PVC AT TX LIIN.PITCH TO DRYWELLS o m� 5.DESIGN LOADING MR ALL PRECAST UNITS N BE-AASHTO-H-20 UNLESS WED. F' Y-�I 4 � Q E'T.EI'iTN� NE J B.MIS PUN IS FOR PROPOSED WORK ONLY AND IS NOT TO (TYP 1 BE USED FOR PROPERTY LINE STAKING 0) WW N 7.ALL STORM RUNOFF TO BE CONTAINED ON SITE.PROVIDE VEGETATED SWAM IN � PERWEIEA AS REWIRED TO ENSURE RUNOFF IS RETAINED. F W..C2TJ p C 2 W asnaG , 2 , B.8'LOAM AND SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT PAYED. I 4 J O S 9.ALL SEPTIC PIPING 4b5ON PVC AT AT 1%MIN.UNLESS NOTED, 10.SEPTIC COMPONENTS NOT TO BE BAGKFRLED OR CONCEALED WITHOUT 9B 54 ANTI I anJ+ INSPECTION BY ENG0IEERIIG AND PERMISSION OBTAINED, It.COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALATIONS MIN APPROPRIATE VENDORS. O _62 I 12.SITE LIGHTING SHALL NOT CAUSE(RARE FOR NOTORISis,PEDESTINS, 4y ,OR NEIGHBORING PREa5E5. 13.TOPOGRAPHY AND DETAIL IN BUILDING LOCATION FROM FIELD SURVEY BY DOWN CAPE n ENGMEERNO REMAINDER FROM TOWN G4S.AND 1987 AERIAL BY DOE (I 5 Nan '^( 4.1 I 14.Al Fnl TEAS ARE TO BE CLEARED AND DRUBBED,WITH TOP AND SUBSgL REMOVED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT.ALL FILL 10 BE CLEAN GRANULAR SAND CONPACTED.IN 8' + UPTS TO 95%MODIFIED PROCTOR MAX.DENSITY.TEAS UNDER BUILDINGS N DE MONITORED /, AND INSPECTED BY FOUND ON ENGINEER.48 MR.NOTICE REWIRED. 15.FILE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS TO BE INSTALLED IN ALL BUILDINGS FIRE CONNECTION AND ab.b 2 ENGINEERED PLANS(BY OTHERS)REQUIRED N CODE.COORDINATE LINE W VATER W. - 16.ALL PROPOSED PAVEMENT N BE FINISHED WITH CAPE COD BERM IY X 3' A a 17.GRADE ALL LAWN AREAS TO PROVIDE POSRIVE PITCH AWAY FROM BUILDINGS TO DRAINS ^l' I ay' a4e• '" 1 II 1B.CONTACTOR TO REPLACE ANY GROUNDWIRE9 DISTURBED WRING CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAIN NSTT ACCESS AT ALL TIMES.' 40' /4r.I4'- J FLAGS 130 E `- D rN CONSULTING ^� 1 1 ✓ 4 I21/0 WAIT LOCU e POND �Q � POND uj O uONN � 'J� 2 POEIU I D ti � // �� I I I 2 0 & � I g m 1 AIRPORT Y / to-' ROUTE 28 OTARY T ��j 4 ! LTH m E T IC / I 10I WI E ! LOCUS MAP SCALE 1"= 2000' o=�^ p ASSESSORS MAP 332 PCL 10-2 X 47.8 ZONING: INDUSTRIAL LTD. _ FRONTAGE-20' 427.02'PROVIDED AREA-90,000 SF 557,564 SF PROVIDED I 1. WIDTH-200' .4oti.wRrnwm MAXIMUM BLDG LOT COVERAGE=25 (' I I f i "7 7. I = J o SETBACKSr. FRONT- 50' SIDE - 30' I I I! I REAR - 30' 1 ` / OVERLAY DISTRICTS: I -47•&� WELLHEAD PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT (�. m 1 •^ 50X MAIL IMPERVIOUS.WX MIN.NATURAL STATE !A A P 332 P,C L 10-2 i X # 755 '� 2 � y X35.6 REFERENCES:PROBATE$6839 /36.7 LOCUS DEED BOOK 4036 'PAGE 119 ( , PLAN BOOK,%153 PAGE 9B /' 420,015 sq ft..f UP .ND' - W ' m \ i, has PLAN BOOK'293 PAGE 62 ` -T ,(' 137,549 .sq.. ft..f W� LAND m FLOOD ZONES 'S'&'C' BARNSTABLE COMMUNITY PANEL 250001 0005 C A JULY 2, 1992 TbT L 55 7,564 sq. ft..f I _....__.._OWNER OF RECORD; <.. .:.._.:_ .:........< ..... .. ....._ _ ......! - OCY@$ -f ... _ ..... .._ _. .... .... ...... .. _ .._ _ . .. ._.. .._._.. / ENOCH T.C688 TRUST !I P B.CONE,TRUSTEE 420. 420.SOUTH STREET HYANNIS, MA. � 02601- X 36.5 ! U 32.8 I ( ! I , ! I I +.•.. X 36.8 / 1 ( / I I ( I I aE em I R1 X 35.9 `'LEG 1 END4Post Umff . a�o sea I I CATCH BASH Q SEWER MANHOLE fI.\I�i a17 0 DRAINAGE MANHOLE .WATER LANE 0 4: IN jt 26.9 I OU E NE W \ \ \ 12 ! I 2 h I OPAINAG LA T- \\ \ A V X 29.7 \0 j LEACHING PR e'%16' 4� ZL� \\ \ MAP 31 2 Q / \ AM 8-B00 II X26.9 TREE r CA. # 180 MANE m G \ X 37.6 / Q 12 ulENCED DUMPSTEN \ 'd Wj T 0 \ ' r o 0y '0 �e2]- aRovosEo CONTOUR � X 3624 77.0 PROPOSED SPOT GRACE -62-E10SRNC CONTOUR '0\.. Omm UDUtY POLE O� \\ (" X 27.7 I I ,pI - X29.6 I aaESseLE s»a60L g \ I I I \ \ PLARi PAINTED STRIPING eX19' \\ \\ I _ 1 o T° ea taa ON 508-362-4541 ©2Oa5 WE \ T b u fox 508 362-MM a GRAFTER:DAD DATE: 1-12-05 M FEET 1 ' SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS t `SIC f. I' -SUPPLY NEW ENGLAND CHKD BY: AHO ARNEµ A" down cope engineering, inc. w75� INDEPENDENCE DRIVE DESIGN: DAD C1117L ENGINEERS Oca BARNSTABLE,.MASSACHUSETTS 1" = 40' LAND SURVEYORS W _ .... .. ._..:_.^,�.,,._.�.._. PERMIT,SET:NOT FOR .. '.`. u"Cc t PPeoa.L Y" 939 Waln Street - YARAIOUTHPORT, MASS. - --' - - 01=,3388ASEF6v5.DWG ' 1 / � , I 153.5E 100' PRIVATE WAY 1974 LO. / I 1 1 246.11' 1 ENT SHOWN ON 1 I I Pg. 293 PG. 62&DB. 4036 PG. 119 1 / y .73' , r LOT 3B 1 - Area-111,096 sq.R! 2.57 A-* GENERAL NOTES 1.THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND VIIUIIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS APPROMMATE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION ON THIS SITE,THE EXGVATTHO CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE REQUIRED 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION TO DIG SAFE -- (1-888-34 7233)AND ANY OTHER UTILITIES WHICH MAY HAVE CABLE,PIPE OR F OISA� EQUIPMENT IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA FOR VERIFICATION OF LOCATIONS. F7 Y 1 r I 2 All CONSTRUCTION LLLTCONFO. TO THE AND BRNST EMPLOYED ON THISx13y { ! PAOJLLT WOW(SMALL CONFORM DEPARTMENT i THE TOWN U IC WORK LE SUBDIVISION REDULAnONS TrI AND/OR 111E MIM STU GESNDHIHWA OF PUBLIC EDRKS RESENT. --�_ I 18 SPo ALL SEPTIC SPECIFICATIONS K A BRIDGES AND HIGHWAYS M AMENDED R PRESENT. W NJi A -` 1 ALL SEPTIC WORM AND MATERIALS TO CONFORM TO 310 CMR/5.00 TITLE 6. F AND eARrSraeLE HEALTH REGULATIONS. � � � 1 12 SPACE? � I 1 132'X 180' }I / 3.ALL VERTICAL GUN.TUM S NGVD29 �Ca�, 4.ALL ROOF RUNOFF N BE PIPED TO 01U1tUGE SYSTEM.COORDINATE DOWNSPOUT'LOCATIONS 'G J�q1 2/,120 SF FOOTPRINT WITH ARCHITECT.ROOF DRAINS 8'OSCH40 PVC AT Ix MIN.PITCH TO ORTWELIS O OR FFLR 80.2 I + I 5.DESIGN LOADING FOR ALL PRECAST UNITS TO RE AASNTO-N-20 UNLESS NOTED. O 3Cj S.THIS PLAN IS FOR PROPOSED WORK ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE OP RAKI . WO ZOAD>kCl 9 SPACES (I 7.ALL SfOUSEDRl1FOR RUNOFFPR roERTY BELANE CONTAINEDNG C ON SITE.PROVIDE VEGETATED SWALES IN bl z= PERIMETER AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE RUNOFF IS RETAINED. �VaI C C^ #755 { GUARORAR EW r 8.8'LOAM AND S ALL DISTURBED AREAS PAVED. •i wz OL ai TYPE 0 � I I 9.ALL SEPTIC PIPIAG rOSCH40 PVC AT IN MIN.UNLESS NOTED. Q Q I y 10.SWDC COMPONENTS NOT TO BE BACXFILLEO OR CONGEALED WITHOUT b M&07.0 INSPECTION BY ENGINEERING AND PERMISSION OBTAINED. 11.COORDINAE UTILITY INSMLlATi0N5 WAIN APPROPRIATE VENDOR. 12.SITE LIGHTING SHALL.NOT CAUSE GLARE FOR MOTORISTS,PEOESTRMNS.OR NEIGHBORING RAKED 5&T � 1J.TOPOGRAPY AN PDDETAIIL IN BUILDING LOCATION FROM FIELD SURVEY BY DOWN CAPE WONH LIMIT LANE NE HAND MY SALE LI I SFORgGE ARWEA R x x ! 1 ! If ENGINEFAIN&REMAINDER FROM TOWN G.I.S.PAID 1987 AERIAL BY DM SEE DETAIL I I 14.ALL FILL AREAS ARE TO BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED,WITH TOP AND I.REMOVED DO, 1 NORgOf 0UN, I 1 11 PRIOR 10 FILL PLACEMENT.ALL FILL TO BE CLEAN GRANULAR SAND COMPACTED IN e' ARFq" I LIFTS TO 95X MODIFIED PROCTOR MAX.DENSITY,AREAS UNDER BUILDINGS TO BE MONITORED AND INSPECTED BY FOUNDATION ENGINEER,48 HR.NOTICE REQUIRED. I / 15.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS TO BE INSTALLED IN ALL BUILDINGS. FINE CONNECTION AND ENGINEERED PLANS(BY OTHERS)REQUIRED TO CODE COORDINATE LINE W/WATER CO. 1 16.ALL PROPOSED PAVEMENT TO BE FINISHED WITH CAPE COD BERM 12'X 3• 17.GRADE ALL LAWN AREAS TO PROVIDE POSITIVE PNCN AWAY FROM BUILDINGS TO DRAWS 18.CONTRACIOR TO REPLACE ANY GROUNDWIRES DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND I i •\ ! I MAINTAIN NRAR ACCESS AT ALL TINES. If �0' �� 14° JAD, I WETLAND FLAGS BY HAMLYN CONSULTING I r* I + 4Y1 �/ 6/21/01 MID COMM '17. SAY LOCUS �I ; �O�oQ O POND POND 2- P\ BARNS.MUN � m `1 I mo.o' I . AIRPORT' Y �c> / I ROUSE 28 OTARY 4 ja 1 Cl)1.1MONWFALTH ELECTRIC / It cw°oo N - 1 ELECTRIC EASEMENT 210 WIDE I Ja PLAN BOOK 218 PG 45_ 1 LOCUS MAP SCALE 1"= 2000' z� j aao / TOT IRE SITE REMAIN IN NATU.RALIDE ORK STATEMIt LINE rI 1 ASSESSORS MAP 332 PCL 10-2 J I i ZONING: INDIISTRIk LTD. I FRONTAGE-20' 427.02'PROVIDED AREA-90,000 SF 557,564 SF PRITMED -WIDTH-200'. 400'+PROVIDED MAXIMUM BLDG LOT COVERAGE- 25% 121.120/557,5"-4%PROPOSED J `I. I ! 1 U 0 SETBACKS: FRONT- 50' SOX PROVIDED SIDE - 30' 31.0'PROVIDED r , I { -N N REAR - 30' N/A I t 1 I o w a OVERLAY DISTRICTS: I 1 I I = Yn WELLHEAD PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT / 1 I I i 5OX MAX.NPERNIMS,JOE MN.NATURAL RATE - I I Ny h - T A P 332 P C L 10-2 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE-21.120 SF 6LOG 42,440 SF PAVEMENT # 755 63,580 SF TOTAL 6J56oHzools UPLAND-laefc ox � NATURAL RAE:'..:•• I ` I 334,793/420A75 UPLAND.80b OX REFERENCES:PROBATE#. j LOCUS T DEED BOOK,4036 PAGE 719 - - PLAN BOOK.453 PAGE 98. ! 420,015 sq. ft..t UPLAND PLAN B001 293 PAGE 62, rI 1,37,.549 sq. ft..f WETLAND. FLOOD ZONES "B"& "C" BARNSTABLE COMMUNITY PANEL 250001 0005 C -- TpTAL 557,564 sq. ft..t JULY 2, 1992 1. I 1 1 OWNEROF RECORD: '-..: . -.-.:_:1---. ... . .._. ....:.._ ..__.....r.._.._.._.. ......._-1'2.80 OCTeS. t;....:.. ... _. .- _........ ._-_-._.._._ _ .__ .. -._ .. _.. ... ... _ J..... .. ... .. .-. .I. ENOCH T.COBB TRUST DAVID B.COLE.TRUSTEE I 420 SOUTH STREET r r I / 1 HYANNIS, MA Lk: 02601 EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED LAND PROPOSED USE WAREHOUSE/WHOLESALE/OFFICE U q I 1 I I (SUPPLY NEW ENGLAND) W?•.a J .a / 1 I I .�I PARKING�U$CAAvLNCULAT16NS: i�a` W2A1,�SF /50 P�LE7SH SHOWROOM; OM30.2 SPACES o J z tr 1(( I1 OFFICE 2,050 SF(/3005� BB SPACES I I - TOTAL•3 7 SPACES REQUIRED -- 37 SPACES PROVIDED INCL 2 HOP ACCESSIBLE NOTE r !1 1 PAFNNG USED FOR LOADING.MATERIAL STORAGE ETC.ASSOCIATED WITH ( I I I WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION PER ZONING BYLAW SECTION 4-2.6(3) OI-LOT TREES AND ISLANDS ARE NOT REQUIRED.BUT 5 N LOT TREES PROVIDED(LOW MATURE KBOW VARIETY ONLY) I 1 r I I ! r 1 1 / I I I I 1 I 1 NM 1 0 POST LIGHT Qi CATCH BASH \ ^ ( I p Q SEWER MANHOLE O DRAINAGE MANHOLE .WATER LINE DRAINAGE LINE CC yp� I LEACHING PR B'%14' O C \\\\ \\\ 11 i MA6-BO 1 # ISO j LANDSCAPE TREE 3'CAL - Z FD So i 2'X12'iENCED DUMPSTER �3 o w�° -021-- PROPOSED CONTOUR 77.0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE 'A -82- EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING UTILITY POLE I d, ACCESSIBLE sTleol \ � �\\ �\ \\ SITE LAYOUT PLAN PAINTED STRIPING 9'x19' \\ \\ � � 1 ( . \ 60 Na oft 508-362-4541 ©2005 WE \ \L \V 508 362-9880 (IN FEET) O DRAFTER:DAD DATE: 1-12-OS 1 Inch-40 t. �Lt6Or _ SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS y SUPPLY NEW ENGLAND CHKD BY: AHO aaLn ^rARNH .Own cape engineering, inc. N cJ #755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE DESIGN: DAD 3m`B OJALA, CllhL ENGINEERS o C4 BARNSTABLE,.M.ASSACHUSETTS 1' ' o �P e LAND SURVEYORS " � --.--_�. ----_ ..__.._.� PERMIT SET:MDT FOR - aCONSTRUCTION e L eW r - 939 Main Street - YARMOUTHPORT, MASS N N 01-338BASEreVS.DWG - - .y. r BENCHMARK: TOP OF SPINDLE 1 i Ivv rtaVAIL WAY 1974 L.O, , ON FIRE HYDRANT EL. 7.1.42 I 71'20 BENCHMARK: SPIKE SET 1 1 INDEPENDENCE IN CENTER ISLAND EL I . 0 DRIVE i EASEMENT SHOWN ON 1 ! 70 i P t7293 PG+ I r �.. �E»� &. DB. 4036 PG. 1 LOT 3B 72 7 I ' Area = 111,995 sq.ft± `0 "' ' =2032, 2.57 Acres± 6 !jo � I 1 m �7s t 70]- - - -- -- ------ - T, -- I r � 78 AR 70� J --74 74 O J N I1n 72 66`- l 7 V !� -72 68 _ 64--_ ! 1 6p 62-_ / C 2 co CO 66 1,130-SF-�AO'T'PRI i 6 1 Yiz,p Do\7p Y LR 60.2. 58 I Q. U.r l� N .1 6011 64 / 2 2 a Q Q -68 #755 R Ne 32\ 1 aT Z -64 56 -62 ;r STAKED SILT FENCE60 1 I' AND HAY BALE LINE "TO SF 0 ''I 4q` l / I R 0 WORK LIMIT LINE 1 (58 7 ,W.:6 1 Eq � 1 SEE DETAIL $ ( 56 - h 36Do O.W 7.0[56] ! 1 ! ! j / ........... .. .. . ,54 / .. 38 .1�. 1 !/ 3fi I l 00 36 35.2 ROMDE TMPORARY MULCH OR 01HER\ I 436 / c� M �'1 SUITABLE EROSION CONTROL MElSlIREB.\ / N h00 ON SLOPE DURING'CO 1 " 35.D3 36" .. t. 3 1 W FLAGS y�4a U Ewes BY HA. YN CONSULTING . I 2'3T+36.ei 34." tz Jf S I'.: J. EW24CHK \ I7s .. 2 .81.:: /,. PROPOSED GRADING LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SCALE:I" 3w .. 1 i 100"'. PRIVgTE WAy.:.j.g74::.LQ;. BENCHMARK: TOP OF SPINDLE !„ ON FIRE HYDRANT EL. 11.42 /! BENCHMARK SPIKE SET. • 1 (NDEPENDEN.CE DRIVE I 1N cENTER ISLAND EL.7f.2a. t 24 . r. ti. . • `. . EASEMENT SHOWN _ . 0 I PB 293 PG 62 & D8<'4036 PG t19 7 I i LOT.3B ISFF �xTERNACLro Area = 111,996 sq.ft± "62.6 .I `6 t ' m l R 2032.00, I 7`� f" 2.57 Acres±' INV. 60.0 \�� ��� • ' »•c. l �. I' • (2) 65' LONG ..0'\ WASHED STONE FRENCH DRAINS i � �' -" -��:--..-;:.. .� co •O w 2500 SF OF 6" ROCK 1/ J((1 4Rylyf ------------------ T.-.. COVERING 1:1.5 CUT > SLOPE, FILTER FABRIC .j(( 01$p�Y ( % ti UNDER. J (i l ARFq /' L. J. FILL GAPS WITH LOAM I / if 3g X73y .1506 GAL'H-20 SEPTIC TANK j I - o & PLANT GROUND CEDAR I I /i( o :.•.� .H�20 DBOX.. ..STD HINGT.R rn a.. . .LEACHING:" y/ ' n.53:9". d bi CO r/�/ ��_ "/��: . �� � � � /rINV. 51.9 132' X 160' 1 ,g,.1. • !! / 70.0'. U-Z) 1 / 21,120 SF FOOTPRINT .1 "!� ! • _ �.:�, +/" t"�" 1 I / VEA/' .,...Loy:! p I 1 r z FFLR 60.2tz (-)a (o I SEPTIC LEACHING CHAMBER INV. 53.01 / / CpADIN I I� O� I/ ' #755 ZONE..°I (WITH04'STONE ALL"ARO ND Si 1I II GUARDRAIL ... ' 1�1 1 ` - L MAS$DP (el I • r • • 1 :TYPE'SS'D co I p1�94D G .I 1�. \ rI : M8.07.0 1 LEGEND: 2 PVC AT T9 153.9 I I JI TRENC 2%FRO i.i p l I. � 0 Post ucNr (;�1 / I �.(N TO LEACH CATCIi BA9Nyx�. ..- • 1 :/ .le. STAKED SILT FENCE ^ 1 55 x`�-x \ / ISEM ww.OLE AND HAY " 1 0 DRaNAGE Ma�TOLE WORK LIMIT SALE LINE \I `��- _ _ x h' �" STORAGE AREpOOR x x "'X / 11 d . SEE DETAIL I . ' _ t RETAINING n 54.8 RIM 59.8 } / 1 w- .WATERUNE TOP\ o� 3600 gF �'�=__- WALL: n 54.8 ( i ORaNAGE uNE STRUCTU S `\� ORAGE �°pOR I I INV. 52.1 ! I EL. 55 \� I. 1 LEA"o PIr exit INV. 53Jb\ Qt r 1 r Ea+osmuE TREE 3•CPL. ! tJ0 � I I I E(�-'�� u I 1 1 r � NroRANr i _ d off�' 1 � r 1 i tom. 1 O TzxTzsENCEo ouNPsrm -{ez1-- PROPOSED amoUR 77.0 PROPOSED SPOT ORAOE 1oN b��' / 1 oA BENCHMARK: SPIKE SET N I ! -e2- EXISTING CONTOUR ,�' / '. h ELEVATION 35.83 .0,EXIST ND UTRR1'POLE { 1 30.0, l WETLAND FLAGS 1 I 1 BU 0.0' !1 BY HAMLYN CONSULTING /\ PaNLEv smwiNc sxTe'_ " ��\ PROPOSED TILITIE$ PLAN SCALE:T''50' off 508-362-9541 ©2005 Da - TCa 908 362-9880 yr 1-12-05 x SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS DRAFTER:DAD DATE: �ARNS vWxoF m' SUPPLY NEW ENGLAND CHKD BY: AHO O,IALAi;. ARNE down cape engineering, in c. u W 0755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE DESIGN: DAD EE Na3T�B7 . W C1WL ENG/NEERS i" = 30' ` $o s - LAND SURVEYORS o Cnl BARNSTABLE, MA55ACHUS�Tn �' Nu �..- .... PERMIT SET:NOT FbR �'a t1 CO (..�. � � l2 �939 Main Street - YARMOUTX/PORT, MASS :01-3388ASE-5.0WG v . �:� : .. 24Yxsr mON COVER H-70(TEFL) 2411-20 CAST IRON COvfJt H-20 RA @C GNARCOAL FINISHED �D IN PIA 6'REVEAL ....... BLOB(UP D-BOX 241.a RISER FILTER FABRIC MANHOLE E AND WEBS .... 'GRADE MORTAR ALL COMPONENTS WEN STONE LABELED SEWER•TO GRADE WHERE INDICATED FUSERS 24 TOP OF CONCRETE 0.57.0 N BLOC16 OR 4 PNRTAST RISERS SJ(p exe•egeg'e•'ee2• e4•e•. •e °.•. 12'AT 2% I-CAL H-20 58.51 ^ fi • e e COSCH40 PVC aoaoe 30'AT 1R T°OO ;°e•a°• •••e• SEPTIC TAN' OAS BAFFLE' 4"SCN40 TC °:xo• '•°CIO•°'°°OL°Otive PI AFS LEVEL 1ST 2 AT 1 R ACME OR EOUK 4'ASCN40 PVC MAW SB N-20 500 GAL.LEACHING CHAMBER BY ACME PRECAST .N.•."...... 6a06' OR SNEA LONG PROD tIW4 DRY WELL 500 DAL H-20 OR EQUAL .. 3 UNITS REDUIRm . g"GRAVEL @ .) ACME DM H-20 OR EQUAL 3 4-i-I Y DOUBLE WASHED STONE 4 NBNL CONPPCiXIN(1TP.) AT SIDES AND ENDS OF PRECAST STRUCTURES 21' SEPTIC PROFILE APPROX SCALE 1/4-m V-W . EL 32-" AWUSIEO HIDE GROUNDWATER SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN DATA TOWARD SITE EXCAVATION 330 RULE I ACRES(33O)-4224 OPD DESIGN FLOW ALLOWED, 2'X r X 36,WOOD POST WD.POST M. OFFICE BUILDING: 2050 SF(75 GAL/1000 SF).154 CPO DESIGN FLOW STAKED HAY BALES 8'MAX C.C. WAAEHOUSE/$HOWROCM:15 GPD/PERSON(13 EMPL)m 225 GPO MIRIFl SILT FENCE OR EQUAL TOTAL DESIGN FLOW;379 GPO NO GARBAGE DISPOSALS ALLOWED FABRIC SEPTIC TANA:370 GPD(2m%).756 GALLON RED.(1S0°GM.ION. -USE 1500 GALLON N-20 SEPTC%K - _ THI USE CI LAYER CLASS i SOBS FOR LEACHING _ -- SOB EVALUniOC DM61 A WAlA P15,SE USE(3)83'F PO 27'EFT.°EPTN�SIEAWINO GALI£l13 5 W%E{'REQUIRED. - - DATE:3/21/02 9W AM AT SIDES AID 4 STONE AT INOS(33.5'%f283'OVT3EAL DIMENSIONS) - '- COMPACTED 13ACKFILL PLAN VIEW BOTTOM -_ EL 34.34 D' SIDEWA CAPACITY. 33SX 12AY-430 SF X 0.74-318 CAD - TUTS 0 A ORGWIC r SIDEWALL 2(J3S'412.83')X 2.0--185 SF X 0.74-137 CPO _ E tCAM'SMD eib Sf 455 CPO O.K.' M - -- EXCAVATED TRENCH I. 3/2 _ METHOD FOR JOINING SILT FEN TION� 5° -/ POSITION END POSTS TO OVERLAP AS SHOWN OhMSAND .ADJUSTED GROUNDWATER io `�/I� �J L.•4 `�� `�j ABOVE,MAKING CERTAIN THAT FABRIC FOLDS 2.6 Y 6/3 ELEVATION 3254 AROUND EACH POST AT LEAST ONE TURN 36• NATURAL GRADE DRIVE LLO VE POSTS TIGHTLY TOGETHER AND SECURE AM�ywND TOPS OF POSTS WITH CHORD ION WIRE TO 2S 6/3 PREVENT FLOW-THROUGH OF BUILT-UP SR GRAVEL 3 AIIWMO ZONE D SEDIMENT AT JOINT. 60' 3 02 REMIND-2SD . - C2 HORIZON 71 NED SAND q NOTE; - 2.SY 1/4 1. OCCAVATE A 6"x 6"TRENCH ALONG SPECIFIED SILT FENCE UNE IMMEDIATELY AFTER O.EARING AND DRUBBING IS COMPLETE AND INSTALL SILT FENCE 2. UNROLL SILT FENCE ONE SECTION AT A RACE.POSTS SHOULD BE POSITIONED ON EL 25. t 103.2• DOWNSTREAM 510E OF FENCE DESERVED GROUNDWATER IDRIVE POST INTO GROUND AND LAY THE TOE-IN FABRIC IN BOTTOM OF TRENCH. EL 25.14 105' .MPAt1 lux BACKFlLL TRENCH,AND TAMP GROUND AS SHOWN IN DIAGRAM ABOVE. REMOVE SILT,AND DEBRIS BEFORE ONE FOOT ACCUMULATION OCWRS AT THE FENCE UNE . _.... 3'PFAtTax PIPE 12"A SNORED N-20 ==�aRH EOIYLPE SILT FENCE INSTALLATION , .7A_1S IItb6 - SOIL DATA 'RASWFA STOVNE 1» P� - O» . MURIONAL'TESTING TO BE PERFORMED i22-•°e^° °•° DURING Pmff mC PROCESS 6'GRAIN LINK FENCE AROUND t--r—I OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS GATES AT SHOWN. H-p0 BATED f8C SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MATERIALS I.e N LB2 3 N-20 OR EQUAL GUARDRAIL TRENCH CROP SECTION A-A' MANHOLE FRAME AND COVERS BASE D MASS DPW OR L 2° TYPE SS �ga NHOLES IN COVER MWUF.SPEC /Mg.07.0 AONSTNC BLOCKS -20 RISER MORTAR ALL CON NENTS FINISHED GROUND SURFACE . GYP,) A (TEFL) b °OOm°OO°°^°^°' ° Qe•�m°aee2ATe °°eTm 2'^eS"e^e 6' %8'0 • 2^°er Oslo vaee°e°.^'e^°`°•°e2'.•m ✓• 6'-B %8'f S•eeaee .. IT=20 i ••°be'e°•°»1S�ee.o H-IIB �•e 3'MN.PEASONE r..SCREENED LOAM °"°"O'O'O :^tie;l i AND MRAT 14NS ae2�2 o e e•e °•A• va•ae.°. 1800 BAIL ° FABRIC OVER STONE I HYDROSEED WITH EROSION CONTROL MO. "e>°eve^: °s°I°.q 1,°• • LFACHPR ••OO°Oti. @ DOWN SIDES OF PO4 1 I PROVIDE JUTE NE1iiNG STARTED TO SLOPE °° •° SIHOREYEOUN.m •,14 _ T:o:e: gHOREY OR EQUAL m egei=°•°.e° 'eves e•� I - _ oa8 -- °•••3/4°-I 1•1/2---°• 1/4'-•1•1/2'•••••••• ° 5 "I ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE PLACEQ I"8'LIFTS OOUBLE WASIIEO STO"C/ _Y"'LEACHING TRENCH-_ -•O•••••\pOUBLE WASHED STONE ^° , `���I----� _ _ MELD FILL TO BE COMPACTED TI 95R MOORED PROCTOR°FNSTTY 4'MN.AROUND PR �6EOVEFN STRUCRIRES WHERE SXpWN 4'NN.MOUND PR -• SEE TRENCH CROSS SECTION I --- E�TLCINEET NN'roN'. NRYSTRO PoC . I - - _ \ I CLEW SAND FILL ONLY I 50•TO am DRAINAGE SYSTEM DETAIL, RENWE ALL TOPSOIL PRIOR.TOFRNNG. -- ------- _ — REMOVE ALL SUBSOIL AND ANY OTHER UNSURMLE MATERIA FRO11.BENEATH ALL -------.- .. 1'.5'XOORIZE AND YERfICAL APPROX. NQ F;ACTE9" D,REPLACE WITH .EARTH SLOPE DETAIL STAM SILT FENCE AND HAYSALES -SCALE: SEE DETAIL Y.5'HORIL AND VERTICAL APPROX ' g'LOAM @ SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT PAVED. 7Z CCBIAM I.`TOPCOAT MASS OPW TYPE n ..:..:. 2'BINDER .... . STENO GRAVEL 6'MIN./• ••e°Ir PROCESSED GRAVEL . PAST EDGE PAVE MDPW M1.03.1 VUL ROLLER COMPACTS) REMOVE TOP @ SUBSOL _. ......- COMPACT SU IGPME Nom REMOVE FROST SUSCFPIIBLE MATERIAL TO A DEPTH aF JB'BELOW FINISHED GRADE REPLACE WITH NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE MATERIAL . "-20 PRECAST MISER (LESS THAN tOR PASSINO®200 SIEVE) 2 PAVEMENT CROSS'SECTION MORTAR ALL COMPONMMS TYP. NOT TO SCALE -,3 26' EWLi E r r TaPm RE . 24• 0w uRWa 1ID2R W1dDY a1A71 MARUF.LABARON.BROCKTON,MA . MODEL UC 110 LABEL SEWER OR DRAIN AS APPROPRUQE WDOHT:476 LOS -TLPICAL ACCESS COVER f I f SCAT 3/4'm 1'-0` V' RDW0R8) 9NX IDI®t I I LOCATION DF TEES MUST BE DIRECTLY UNDER OPENING. 2e I I TO TUP�WITH STAINLESS STRAP r— —y OOVDE SOVdO li G P1 n MAIMS) NW�E IF _ �o 000aoI`11 II D 6EGD1LT SPNID ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ 11 AIDRD LIRE 2 U252 tAW ❑❑❑8❑❑❑❑ 1 ll SATED C-0•BSI 1RWL ❑❑❑❑❑❑(01❑ MANUF.LABARON,BROCKTON.MA 1, ll AiAff$pA piRR&1E AW ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ MODEL:LF 248-2 �1 !/ PW®WNOlal1AN BE WETGM:480 LBS 1 D BR® ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ll ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ HR r OBP sam FRAME AND GRATE UIPINN,a=mam SCALE.3/4" 1'-0' -. WIDER BERM TO 19-X 6'AT qt''°. t 1 v' L� i� 1DP FINISH COURSE MASS DPW PROP.H-20 F@O 1B' BASINS(TEFL) °q ::Y I.I' �apPKjEp RB-FRAM TYPED .r X 2'CRATE, LABARON LF-448-2 OR Ea. SNL w 'A A 12 IY IlV MR TEE LOCATION MIU5DNG GORSES AS REQ'D. TREE PLANTING DETAIL MORTAR ALL.COMPONEMIS N.T.S. BINDER COURSE COLLAR DETAIL "°T'°SCALE BED FRAME M FULL 1r X 12• NOT TO SCALE -' CONCRETE COUAR FLUSH .. WITH BASE COAT ASPHALT 3000 PSI CLASS I MIN. ©2005 DCE Off 508-362-4541 fax 508 362-9880 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS rn DRAFTER:DAD DATE Dla 1-12-05 Wa SUPPLY.NEWENGLANO CHKDBY: AHO oNE. _ down cape engineering, inc. cA� #755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE DESIGN: DAO cmtr %` C/l9L ENGINEERS O 00 i» 4D°: Na 307 '..Na2 6 •: BARNSTABLE,Y4MASSACHUSETTSPERMIT .Nor FDR A �F9e 19 ° _. LAND SURVEYORS D J LL o AL 4 CONSTRUCTION4 939%Moln Street — YARAWOUTNPORT, MASS 01=338EIASErev&DWG �^��,.: �llv,�E���^ �.tr7uarrv�� +,.o-'�_�.■.ter=+.��rrlls��''tt��a./—= KiNg"Olso. i 0 a �Hr(y�VN/�/ii/ �73/ k!//%7 . 3� ... i S� r�� I�m:'alt�■c-I� i� ,. ►�L,4B:aii "Hill lutgo ./ �♦ �*,�• ���i ► CIF 11\• w� 1 ' r �� 1 .. �' NOW, WE s It �G7L3.,{ '1 a� ��,��,,ji • 1 , • I 0 w '��������S�t��t����ttttt�t��tt�t�tttt•ttttttt�!•����� ,�_�_t���ttttt�A•�_�_�_�_�O���ttttttttatttt���ttttttt�l�t��tt�� �St•��Itttt��-ttttllt������tttttttplitttttlt�t!_tttttttt•��tttt�lttttttl�tlttttt��>•� '�1�1!T!�R!JII'�'1A11'�/�������tttttttt•ttt��tt�tttttttt•���t��ltt�ttttttt����� ,� �A�tttlttt�tle�t�t����t����t��ttt�ttllltt�tttttttt•tttttttt�tttttt�ttttt� e��5�������w!_��tttttttt•ttttttt�tttttti�t�����tttttttt•��t�l��t��t� �S�Ittttttt•�1■li t�'�'='�ts�tttt�t�!��I�tttttttt•tttttttt•tt��■11■��■t���tttttttt•��t�lt�t�ttt� ttttt���tttttt�ot�lt�u;<■�It��--■�■Iw�� ��t�cr..,� Y':"*�ttltttt�tlttllt�Ittltlt�tt111tt1�tltltlt�tttttttt�tltttltt�1111tt�ttlt� •'tt���Itttf3liL'13y: 1ITL�•�II®���1����S iY�RLNIY4"����t���tOttt�� 'ttttt�����lt�l�,�_.:�,_:armora�tot���■�t�c;:xritt�■�It��ttt���t�t�tttt�� ttltttt• --- ----------����w-�i�a�wtli��r0'Je IF1����•�•�7���s���.e��1� 'ttt���tttt��o���seF�I���G���ze��ttwltw•w■� �iliti6L'Ittttt�■Ittttlt��ttttt�tltttttt•ttttttt��ttttttt�tltt� .,Ittttt���Itttl��ttltlLlttltwttw�IBlla::��a■�sw�z a���twla�.s.�a:��:zaii��ut�l!�t�stt�t��lttt�tttt�tttt�tt� �Ittttttttt���>_�rrr. .�zaa::mr:sl.®.�m�l■�.��------.w:aswt�ta■��t��t�tt��t�� ,�����I�t�®II®tiiLLi�I��■�.CIA:r�epYl18'1��1■ii��t��0•tt��! �S�S�����I4ync■n;■e;�o,a:aaaalrxc�ttttltttlilL�LSAtt��7ttttttt��■Itttttt��lt�ttttttt��ttt��■� �®t•1-������II®ttl��.73J�I+�Fr•0♦:{�,'[Y.39:IL1�'��/�•aM�!�t��I�1.O•I0�1�!•�t��� '���1•�1�I�wl®®�=:tlIQbP.p....���C1M!9".����f�'�<1w_��I-t�•s�� ,its®�ttt��t���l��t� - ie.n;nu:a.�..:.��■�Rr:MJ��■1������•w�Y�■ ®�Ittttttt•��A-�t�l�tttttttt•�tttt■L'ia➢191C717t'F?7 ��i� Itltltt�t�t�t��!•�tlttl� a®������ww I�1ltttltltA>•"a.l. .,.I I.:.:a,IL�U;{'.91:2l;:L17:i�s■ttttttt�tttlw�����ttttttt�ttttttt�tttt� ,. e1 � )I '�0�tttttt•1��■��I�tttttt������s����t��� ""l a.:�.•�1t�■Y•�Y�tiil�ml�����(NiCUl:1.1'.'ll:ly:.1'1i:!p':lil���-S , �lOtitttt��A•�-�t�ltti�t�*0�������t�� 'at�tttt�ttttt�����lnsl��c�l�tttttttt��t��ll�■It�tt�ttt�lt�� .,ttttttttttt�te�t��Vatttt�ttttttlti��t�t�tt�I�ttltttt���tt�t�.Z'Z+ttttttttttt�llltttllls0���-�� 1�t�������ttt�ittttttttttw•�t�ttttttttttt�>.�t�a�+sa�t��ttt� tltttttttttt�l�ttt�ttttt��tttttt���tt�ttttttttttt�®�����tt�rl■t.'I��++e.-ram 'e1Al��ttltttttt�-��tAitlTF�l oC'7:. �����ttllll•t��t��� Yam, 11=s��������� twi:����tt���ttttt�t�t��t��� �t������-tttt•I��C,I�.Cd.7ZS3a:e-�-��� ,tltttttlttit�i�����--���II.Ti�itttttttr`"��•�-����� 11 11 11 II 11 -'�Gl�tl!ttttl■-��--a-�--t !��Iti�Z■■����15Gi7iSl!i3i3C31I�i������1 !-'-11mmmmFIR7^a I;'.'.�:3,:,;���ttttttl-�tt���������1 -Ilt��tttttttt��tt������■�•�������1 MEE Ell. SITE .•�71I�tt�ttlttltt��tttt��������.1�■�:�-�I������t I ���•���.��t�t�rmr�_rr>_��It�lt�t�t�stttt��tt���l I -It�����--1�■I�Ot�l►�1�■5�--1 �'Il����s�tttttttttttttttl;�I:FI.i:Tdm[�O -"'��tlit0�1������1 III I 11 11 DEVELOPMENT °Y)•. SUPPLY NEW ENGLAND down cope GINEERS .�'e� II I / SURVEYORS MASSA#755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE �� ClVqL eering, Inc. •• • -.- • 10 0 • i • 10 I T I I I I I C I � I j I j I i I 1 _ A 21svArgrc�,z5•.a ._._.—._.___._._ I ± I I •.• 4 8$� i 17 I I -1.1 --- ----- ------- j i I I I j .-A 45meY-o` -_.--_ _._._._ I µ - ARLI�fELlURALGML. - �F� _— —._._.—. . _._.______—._ __.._.—.__{-___._.__ .___._-_._._.—._._.—. ARLrnScrlR ,M ._._._._._.— i - __-- {._.—__-_._._._.—._._._._._._._.—.___.—_. aLaa.sTazEwartsrsrw AuaLsro�FPartsYsrva wxLovSuoarASP I - � cSrAra+SwAuw FOP£GRpIAp. NORTH ELEVATION swe:va•.ra' . z Q t"- Q • W z w DZ J � LU Z Ltl W og LU a l 3 !L Sg u�i Q zz jl 1 .j I j j II I I j u �Ay Ert A1%4!¢5'4 `0 WA srEF�. _._.—._._._.-- —.---.----- --————----—---! —.---— ------,— .�A�zzELEv,tn•a .I I i I I ; 'r 1 I li I i I' j j ro�xxcarsrs,eM. • N m FNG11 F�{gpR --_--._.---_-._-- F111RAHLEWUIfY 1— j L a EIEVArpk,OL'O ! 1 I f I RETAARJGWALL ---- ' MM1SpplY MIEE WAIL) W I NWUIFDMETAL PNIFLSYSfEM Ij MCIYIEC1LItµ L.M.U. QL4Alldd(fENLE Ir � EAST ELEVATION • swls:va^era 1 R - 05107 II ® II I I I i! 1 11 II I 11 j I I II '1 j I I it oz I� I I OWINR FFXy I 11 1 i i i � aap II _ I RETN11kiwN1 iI- •----- i I_' war-- ; i 1 0 I' tJ —__-_. .i----_____ 8 @ S= if -._._._._._._._.� o .1 it ; I; 11 I i it if i JC if I it i I it I 11 I OFAff11NegAEove I II b 'NIS X i✓ i j it i i a --- j--- --- it i II W i1 i ------ I --------------- 1 i -�t-------------------------------------- iit -----------------•------ _� i i I - -------------- e i MANS it i i if i is n% i if i i it i ii it i i I it i li 4 1 it i i I it i i DAY ARE ISPLA i LUNCH I I I it a-- --- --------------- if i ----------- --- --- -----------------------------------------. ---------- ---------------- - II ; II ------- c I if I I It WAREHOUSE i i Q z i OFFICE ,I i Z J i if i J a.- i i l IL/ 11 O it it Z O I I I I I LLI O a------------------------ I---------------------------- OMP. it i ii Z s w it t I ------ i t i !i 0 -------------------------------0-------------------------------------------' li I" Q I I it W---- ---------------------i' �n . j DESIGN il --------� OFFICE if i it i ' I II j II u'a I II 1 I W I II I II ti LL 1 11 if i ii iiUTILITY it i i iIF t / \------------------------ if I ———--- - 11 I 11 q fu'Z --- -- ---—-- —— it i T Q —— ———----- _---- ---———— I I 3 it ——— -----—--- --- - ——— --------- ----- if w a0'-o• II I I VO'-0• I' II I I it i j t O1.1 O I I it O O I I 4 4.9 O NORTH 051.07 TOP M STEEL . �D - ap - FlN�N IIH t t HNU«BOOR . NORTH ELEVATION md• m _.-- Igu FMBN FLOOR . BEVY IVN V b f ---.-.-.----------------------------------------------------------.-.-.-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•---.-.-.-.--- -.-.-.-.-.-.-.--.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. -.-.- FlNIOH FLOOR . L3EYi 100'4' ' WEST ELEVATION NORTHERN HERITAGE BUILDERS 135 BARNSTABLE RD, HYANNIS,MA 02601 508-1�5-4389 Y I f Top OP 07m fl ELEv�17-0• � . 4 SOUTH.ELEVATION MOW m IU ------------ wjgi� 1� - ---[ nea vmie+i agora ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ r +� FlNldi Fl1JOR EAST ELEVATION NORTHERN HERITAGE BUILDERS 135 BARNSTABLE RD. HYANNIS,MA 02601 ® 50B-TI5-4353 3/16"•.11-0" 5 , a Y 1 l a 1 C SITE DEVELOPMENT P #755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE, BARNSTABLE9 MA 02630 gg Y �a GLL,! `*90' GMC N .TA B� Mm GPE HIGHWAY u SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS L CE `M T. PERMR SET—NOT FOR CONSiRUCNON #755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE, BARNSTABLE,MA 02630 DATE : 01/12/05 . . r�•d T s .0 CCC k SPR COMMENTS REVISED: 06/10/05 REVISED: 07/18/06 CONCOM FlLNC f ga °J.N ,, HYTA NIS VILLAGE LINE REVISED: 10/03/06 ' SPR COMMENTS REVISED: 2/21/07 ROG FOOPRIN n APPLICANT. JDJ HSG.DEV.LLC, C/O KELLER CO. y 683 C MAIN STREET Nn � 3 OSTERVILLE,MA 02655 PH. 1-508-428-4323 ZONING VICINITY SKETCH R ZB ®� Rrza bo CIVIL ENGINEERING: DOWN CAPE ENGINEERING,INC. 1 =1200 LOCUS MAP 1"=1500' ARNE H. OJALA PLS.)PE DANIEL A. OJALA PLS,PE. SHEET LIST: 939 MAIN STREET YARMOUTHPORT,MA 02675 A. COVER SHEET 1.EXISTING CCONDITIONS PLAN PH. 1-508-362-4541 FAX 1-508-362-9880 2. SITE LAYOUT PLAN 3. GRADING LANDSCAPE &UTILITIES LEGAL: PATRICK M. BUTLER ESQ 4.DETAIL#1 SEPTIC&SITE DETAILS NUTTER McCLENNEN&FISH LLP 5.DETAIL#2 SECTION VIEWS P.O.BOX 1630 HYANNIS, MA 02601 PH. 1-508-790-5407 01-338 B FAX: 1-508-771-8079 eel, I I EAR N SHOW bNI I IN EPENDENCE DRiV PB m 3 +'s'` & DB 1169z s �1s 1 , ,' z 60 � GENERAL NOTES: 1.THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS APPROXIMATE PER R TO ANY EXCAVATION ON THIS SITE THE EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE REOUIRED 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION TO DIG SAFE 1 _-7 (1-888-344-7233)AND ANY OTHER UTILITIES WHICH MAY HAVE CABLE.PIPE OR 8 +n ! EQUIPMENT IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA FOR VERIFICATION OF LOCATIONS. i, }T°'0 70_ I 2,ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS,COMPONENTS.AND METHODS EMPLOYED ON THIS W 78 PROJECT WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE TOWN OF BARNSTABLE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS [„ ]6 I I w / 68� I AND/OR THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD --74 74 / SPECIFICATIONS FOR BRIDGES AND AM HIGHWAYS AS ENDED TO PRESENT. 72 ALL SEPTIC WORN AND MATERIALS TO CONFORM TO 310 CNR 15.00 TIRE 5. [/� W ---72 7 I 54, / AND BARNSTABLE HEALTH REGULATIONS, m 6 m 3.VERTICAL IS NGVD29 E, h ssb m 4.ALL ROOF RUNG DATUM FF TO BE PIPED TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM,COORDINATE DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS Q O GO 1 V EXISTING m I I 6p� WITH ARCHITECT.ROOF DRAINS 8'PSCH40 PVC AT 1%MIN.PITCH TO DRYWELLS Z U 98 U —70 se/ ELECTR I w }m 5.DESIGN LOADING FOR ALL PRECAST UNITS TO BE AASHTO-H-20 UNLESS NOTED. q Y j�?4 / �h +e°u m NE(TmJ ,56` , B.THIS PLAN IS FOR PROPOSED WORK ONLY AND IS NOT TO p cL w BE USED FOR PROPERTY LINE STAKING. O y,O LL p +� 1 7.A STORM RUNOFF TO BE CONTAINED ON SITE PROVIDE VEGETATED WALES DI U U_—,- 1 I S / PERIMETER AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE RUNOFF IS RETAINED. W C ♦e,.�s +se.es / 2� I 8.6.LOAM AND SEED AIL DISTURBED AREAS NOT PAVED. U] _C�Om so, ! i6 ee3 9.ALL SEPTIC PIPING 4"0SCH40 PVC AT IX MIN.UNLESS NOTED. coI m 10.SEPTIC COMPoNENTS NOT TO BE BACKFILLED OR CONCEALED WITHOUT "6° 58 e91 • I I 4B\•,.s. I INSPECTION BY ENGINEERING AND PERMISSION OBTAINED. _ 11.COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATIONS N APPROPRIATE VENDORS. �62 I — — SO 1 I 44,4 l 12.SITE LIGHTING SHALL NOT CAUSE GLARE FOR MOTORISTS,PEDESTRIANS, ' OR NEIGHBORING PREMISES. 13.TOPOGRAPHY AND DETAIL IN BUILDING LOCATION FROM FIELD SURVEY BY DOWN CAPE 42— FR I ENGINEERING.REMAINDER OM TOWN G.I.S.AND 1957 AERIAL BY DCE. ° qb 5 ' 14.ALL FELL REMOVED ARE TO BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED.WITH TOP AND SUBSOIL REMOV / I msi\�� �68 PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT.ALL FILL TO BE CLEAN GRANULAR SAND COMPACTED IN 6- UFTS TO 95%MODIFIED PROCTOR MAX.DENSITY.AREAS UNDER BUILDINGS TO BE MONITORED AND INSPECTED BY FOUNDATION ENGINEER.48 AL NOTICE REWIRED. , n�42 I'IFA I 15.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS TO BE INSTALLED IN ALL E.COORDINATE FIRE CONNECTION AND i ENGINEERED PLANS(BY OTHERS)REQUIRED TO CODE COORDINATE ME W/WATER CO. Lam,.i A s I m 16.ALL PROPOSED PAVEMENT TO BE FINISHED WTIN CAPE COD BERM 12-%J' 17.GRADE ALL LAWN ARM TO PROVIDE POSITIVE PITCH AWAY FROM BUILDINGS TO DRAINS -54 �9� -38 18.PLACE FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN DRANAGE FRAME&GRATES UNTIL SITE EROSION IS STABLIZED. 19.CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE ANY GROUNDWIRES DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND 6 MAINTAIN NSTAR ACCESS AT ALL TIMES. J 8 i 36 J W Q HAGS /44 zit BY HAA1 YN CONSULTING ✓x + 8/21/0�" MEG CAPE HIGHWAY ♦.xps�42 � N�7 COMM I 7 .NIP, G4WA Y LOCO 2pY�prr e Q POND FLINT ROCK POND m 1 y u 7 En RD�F' OQ~ DU nis 1 g ( I BARNS..MUNND U o _ I 210.0' AIRPORT x Z y o Q¢ m IC , 1 ROSE 28- OTARY yZS a ;� EL-MMECTF{NC EASE PIT t0 WIDEct / 1 cWi o S / I PLAN OOK 218mPG 45� LOCUS MAP SCALE 1"='2000' ASSESSORS,MAP 332 PCL 10-2 ZONING: INDUSTRIAL LTD. FRONTAGE-20' 427.02'PROVIDED AREA-90,000 SF 557.564 SF PROVIDED 1 WIDTH-200' 4OD'+PROVIDED MAXIMUM BLDG LOT COVERAGE = 25% I I I I 1 SETBACKS: FRONT- 50' 1 SIDE - 30' - I °n'x"e° I I REAR - 30' / 33.22 I I I I I a OVERLAY DISTRICTS: WELLHEAD PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT 50R MAx.IMPERVIOUS,30%MIN.NATURAL STATE A P 332 P C L 10—2 I m # 7 55 1 I I ' I I I I I I REFERENCES:PROBATE # 6839 LOCUS DEED BOOK 4036 PAGE 112 " I PLAN BOOK 453 PAGE 9 i 420,015 sq. tt..t UPLAND 8 L,ns PLAN BOOK 293 PAGE 62 137,549 sq. ft..t WETLAND FLOOD ZONES "B"& "C" BARNSTABLE COMMUNITY PANEL 250001 0005 C TpTAL 557,564 sq. ft..t / h JULY 2, 1992 / OWNER OF RECORD: W I 12.80 OCF2S f I �j 1 3 8 ENOCH T. COBB TRUST DAVID 8. COLE, TRUSTEE F I 420 SOUTH STREET =ja� HYANNIS, MA. 02601 v I e $ I v3i I / 1 I I II 1 / / I / I +aw I I I I I *j 71I I I �.ID 1 exie 1 LEGEND: 4 POST LIGHT m o Q CATCH BASIN �\ T , I OQ IOj EWI� Q SEWER MANHOLE O \Oall DRAINAGE MANHOLE � \ .WATER LINE x \\ I 2 O h 1 W DRAINAGE LINE 4\ LEACHING PIT 6'X14' o Q7 \\\ \\ I I NA8-B00 I r \ \ ' I # 180 I 01 4 O. o HYDRANT �7m °G2 W O e �� ;� 12'XIV—GED DUMPSTER o IC � 2�� W 4 P —[82}-- PROPOSED CONTOUR GI �u, 77.0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE OT \ 1 Y 1 —82— EXISTING CONTOUR C` \ J� EXISTING UTILITY POLE ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL PAINTED STRIPING SOIL TEST \ \ \ 74 off 506-362-4547 \ fox 508 362-9880 ©2007 DCE \ �\ T m b w (IN FEET) DRAFTER:DAD DATE: 1-12-05 1 IOCN=40 ft. '^ SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS I=+I CHKD BY: AHO REV.: 6-10-OS C/OWn cape engineering, inc. EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN m I DESIGN: DAO REV.: 9-16-05 (CCC COMMENTS) CIVIL ENGINEERS 0755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE o C J BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS 1" = 40' REV.: 7-18-06 (CONCOM'FILING) LAND SURVEYORS PERMIT SET:NOT FOR REV.: 10-3-06 (SPR COMMENTS) 00 PREPARED FOR JDJ HSG.DEV.LLC C/O KELLER CO. 939 Main Street - YARMOUTHPORT, MASS. LI' 683C MAIN STREET,OSTERVILLE,MA 01-338BASErev9C.DW REV.: 2-21-07 BLDG FOOTPRINT) luu PRIVATE WAY 1974 L.O. I / I i INDEPENDENCE (DRIVE EASEMENT SHOWN ON 153.5T 1 ) I I 246.11' I1 PB. 293 PG. 62 & DB. 403E PG. 119 1 I 1 I 0 00 O CbO Oo If 000 0 0 ® �� I GENERAL NOTES: 'B B.O. ------_____ O O O 1.THE LOCATION OF EXLSTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS fx1 // I O O- -I 0 �O Q I APPROPRATE. PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION ON THIS WE,THE EXCAVATING [., I I qq --0.• _ O CONTRACTOR SMALL MAKE THE REQUIRED 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION TO DIG SASE fjJ 2500 SF OF 6'ROCK -�-e - -7 I (1-888-344-7233)AND ANY OTHER UTILITIES WHICH MAY HAVE CABLE,PIPE OR �., COVERING 1:1.5 CUT II I I { MAAiNE AREA I EOUIPME14T IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA FOR VERIFICATION OF LOCATIONS. (7 SLOPE,FILTER FABRIC Y / 2.ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS,COMPONENTS,AND METHODS EMPLOYED ON THIS i1LLECP➢S Wlfli 'KT20' I 18 PROTECT WORK SMALL CONFORM TO THE TOWN OF BARNSTABLE SUSDNL510N REGULATIONS w &PUNT GROUND CEDAR I I 20 SPACES AND/OR THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR BRIDGES AND HIGHWAYS AS AMENDED TO PRESENT. ,Cy J I ALL SEPTIC WORK AND MATERIALS TO CONFORM TO 310 CMR 15.00 TITLE 5. .c, I 11 SPACES m 1 I I I AND BARNSTABLE HEALTH REGULATIONS, ti Q I I I 3.VERTICAL DATUM IS NM29 fYi ~��NO I 4.ALL ROOF RUNOFF TO BE PIPED TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM.COORDINATE DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS O fO RQ I I 15,300$F FOOTPRINT WITH ARCHITECT.ROOF DRAINS 8'OSCH40 PYC AT 1%WIN.PITCH TO DRYWELLS CO..1 O C y O• I I FRR 60.2 5.DESIGN LOADING FOR ALL.PRECAST UNITS TO BE AASHTO-H-20 UNLESS NOTED. 6.THIS PLAIN IS FOR PROPOSED WORK ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE USED FOR PROPERTY LANE STARING. �, W O .} I I I' I 9 SPACE$ ].ALL STORM RUNOFF TO BE CONTAINED ON SITE.PROVIDE VEGETATED MALES IN !. 2 2, I I I. 120.0• PERAEIER AS RECURRED TO ENSURE RUNOFF IS RETAINED. 'G {V CL I I Y } l Ig I I 8.8"LOAM PAID SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT PAVED. C)� 0) •-, I /C I I /0'3 I$I I 9.ALL SEPTIC PIPING 405CH40 PVC AT 1%MIN.UNLESS NOTED. Q "R O �NAy,. I4 I(y 1 I 10.SEPTIC COMPONENTS NOT TO BE SACKFILLED OR CONCEALED WITHOUT DOCK I INSPECTION BY ENGINEERING AND PERMISSION OBTAINED. �� �___GUARDRAIL ,47.0 Ig I�g I I 11.COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATIONS WITH APPROPRIATE VENDORS. dY PRIOR FOOTPRINT �'�E 55 24 I I I I 12.SITE LIGHTING SMALL NOT CAUSE GLARE FOR MOTORISTS.PEDESTRIANS. STAKED SLT FENCE OR NEIGHBORING PREMISES. AND HAY BALE LINE 13.TOPOGRAPHY AND DETAIL IN BUILDING LOCATION FROM FIELD SURVEY BY DOWN CAPE WORK LIMIT LANE I ENGINEERING.REMAINDER FROM TOWN G.I.S AND 1987 AERIAL BY OCE. SEE DETAIL 14.ALL FILL AREAS ARE TO BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED.WITH TOP AND SUBSOIL REMOVED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT.ALL FILL TO BE CLEAN GRANULAR SAND COMPACTED IN 6' UFTS TO 95X MODIFIED PROCTOR MM.DENSITY.AREAS UNDER BUILDINGS TO BE MONITORED I I AND INSPECTED BY FOUNDATION ENGINEER.A8 HR.NOTICE REQUIRED. 15.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS TO BE INSTALLED IN PLL BUILDINGS. FIRE CONNECTION AND ENGINEERED PLANS(BY OTHERS)REQUIRED TO CODE.COORDINATE LINE W/WATER CO. I 16.ALL PROPOSED PAVEMENT TO BE FINISHED WITH CAPE COD BERM 12'X 3' 1 LEASE LINE- I /S I \� I 17.GRADE ALL LAWN AREAS TO PROVIDE POSITIVE PITCH AWAY FROM BUNTINGS TO GRAINS / 134,682 SF I 1 I I 18.PUCE FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN DRAINAGE FRAME&GRATES UNTIL SITE EROSION IS STABILIZED. I (3.09 AC.) I 100% UPLAND III.CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE ANY GROUNDWIRES DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND I I I "MAIN NSTAR ACCESS AT ALL TIMES. WEILAND RAGSI I gO R 1 I BY HAMMLYN CONSULTING \', I j` CK6/21/01 li I CK MID COMA §§ I I I \\\\ WA LOCUS sy Q g RSRAEL O�Q= POND I C\ O FLINT K POND \rt✓} z �I I I Tn 1 ROyE Oft�I GUNN Q I POND BARNS.MUN. �AIRPORi yI°n �/ 1 210.0' / 28 OTARY d�SSa / COMMONWEALTH ELECTRIC / R0U a Q.0 N I ELECTRIC EASEMENT 210' WIDE / I 0o_ym, I I PLAN BOOK 215 PG 45 I 1 LOCUS MAP SCALE 1"= 2000' wQ j I 0 P?o I I ASSESSORS MAP 332 PCL 10-2 2 I 1 I / I ZONING: INDUSTRIAL LTD. I FRONTAGE-20' 427.02'PROVIDED AREA-90,000 SF 557.564 SF PROVIDED I I Y I I WIDTH-200' 400'+PROVIDED MAXIMUM BLDG LOT COVERAGE = 25% 15,300/557,564-2.7%PROPOSED I I I ) SETBACKS: FRONT - 50' SO.B'PROVIDED SIDE - 30 J6.D'PROVIDEO REAR - 30' N/A 1 �j _ I 1 I 1 I I a OVERLAY DISTRICTS: WELLHEAD PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT SOX MAX.IMPERVOUS.30%MIN.NATURAL STATE I PAP 332 PCL 10-2 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 15,N10 SF BLDG T I 1 ) I lzi 39,695 SF PAVEMENT / 11 755 55.1 BS SF TOTAL TtTt 55.195/420.015 UPLAND-13.1%O.0 I 1 I I - 1 NAN334;93/420,015 UPLAND=80%O.K. I LOCUS REFERENCES:PROBATE # 6839 DEED BOOK 4036 PAGE 112 / I = / 420,015 sq. ft..t UPLAND PLAN BOOK 453 PAGE.98 PLAN BOOK 293 PAGE 62 I 137,549 sq. ft,.t WETLAND FLOOD ZONES "B" & "C" BARNSTABLE COMMUNITY PANEL 250001 0005 C TpTAL 557,564 sq. ft..f JULY 2, 1992 OWNER OF RECORD: W / 12.80 OCF2S f I I i o I ENOCH T. COBB TRUST m I I o I DAVID B. COLE,TRUSTEE 420 SOUTH STREET z Q, I I I 0 o I HYANNIS, MA O t O m I I I 02601 2 VNj ti / I I I EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED LAND.INDUSTRIAL LTD.ZONE PROPOSED USE:WAREHOUSE/WHOLCS LE/OFFICE PARKING CALCULATIONS: iae WAREHOUSE/WHOLESAU SHOWROOM: 4��p v / I / I 11,700 SF(1 SPACE/700 SF)-M SPACES OFFICE 6900 NET SF(f/300 SF)-23 SPACES TOTAL:4(S SPACES REQUIRED = I U AD SPACES PROVIDED INCL 2 HCP ACCESSIBLE I NOTE: I PARKING USED FOR LOADING,MATERIAL RR STORAGE ETC.ASSOCIATED WITH I I I WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION PER ZONING BYLAW SECTION 6-1.8(3) I 1 1 I 1 IN-LOT TREES ANTI ISLANDS ARE NOT REQUIRED,BUT 5 IN LOT TREES PROVIDED(LOW MATURE HEIGM VARIETY ONLY) I I I Y fY It I / I I I I I I I I/ I 11 LEGEND: I I 0 POST LIGHT Q CATCH BASIN 0' SEWER MANHOLE 0 DRAINAGE MANHOLE O \ \\ 1 1 m n I W W WATER LINE DRAINAGE LANE K j \\� \\ ,L I S In 1 \ MAP 312 I (Q LEACHING PR 8'X14' O \ \\ \ 1 i 8-B00 I # 180 �'''y { eR LANDSCAPE TREE 3"CAL AerA° OWN J o �O \ \ Yy \\ 1 OJUNIPERUS CNINENSISGy \ SEA GREEN' 3 GAL(74) 0: h F p� I I I b HYDRANT ID12'%12'FENCED DUMPSIER W I ---(821- PROPOSED CONTOUR I 77.0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE J�'� \ O -82- EXISTING CONTOUR I 00 EXISTING UTILITY POLE b„ ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL � \ ,\ PSI \ I I I �\ \ SITE LAYOUT PLAN I PAINTED SRRIPING B'%19' \ \ SOIL TEST \ \ / \ oft 508-362-4541 ©2007 0CE fox 508 362-9880 I` \\ \ m u P ,` (IN FEET) LI' SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS DRAFTER:DAO DATE: 1-12-05 1 min>40 f1. m CHKD BY: AHO REV.: 6-10-05 down cope engineering, Inc. SITE LAYOUT PLAN mH I REV.: 9-16-OS CCC COMMENTS CIVIL ENGINEERS N CA #755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE DESIGN: DAD ( ) o (-A BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS 1" = 40' REV.: 7-18-06 (CONCOM FILING) LAND SURVEYORS 1 00 PREPARED FOR JDJ MSG.DEV.LLC C/O KELLER CO. PERMIT SET:NOT FOR REV.: 10-3-06 (SPIT COMMENTS) N 883E MAIN STREET,OSTFRMLLE,MA 939 Main Sheet YARMOUrHPORT, MASS. [� 01-338BASErev9C.DW REV.: 2-21-07 (BLDG FOOTPRINT) a to I 1 I 100' PRIVATE WAY 1974 L.O. I 1 I I EASEMENT SHOWN ON BENCHMARK: TOP OF SPINDLE 1 W ON FIRE HYDRANT EL. 71.42 / INDEPENDENCE I n.2D Tom BENCHMARK: SPIKE SET 1 F 1 ENCE DRIVE I SPIKE IN CENTER ISLAND EL. 71.23 I ' I PB. 293 PG. 62 & DB. 4036 1 471.16 �p 119 I F I � I 174' -3d'6,29' C 7 lJJ �O (70] O OO. mO (68) t 66) ' I O Nm`' 61 i I C 2500 SF OF 6" ROCK COVERING 1:1.5 CUT a I SLOPE, FILTER FABRIC ^ W 30 NNE UNDER. `O / (y 30 I I / FlLL GAPS WITH LOAM- v ti 76 TOWARD SITE EXCAVATION &.PLANT GROUND CEDAR 74 I y 74 - I I % � / I 1 2"X 2"X 36"WOOD POST J I /IQ 2 1 I (9'5] STAKED HAY BALES / 8'MAX.C.C. IZ 72 I 68 6 MIRIFI SILT FENCE OR EQUAL ~~ I IZ 66 1 1 0 1 8' FILL A POL SF OTPRIN I I o I /a --70 I I / 0 LR 60.2 N I I .4 C AT POLE I COMPACTED BACKFILL -+ f0 .R S AS REQUIRE V 2 I 120.0• LO 0 to I _ -- EXCAVATED TRENCH Q •� -g8 I / / i N 1 Ne N } lQ 4 CZ) A `•/ ors 14 I;u I o 0 NATURAL GRADE Z �62 11 O SIG WAC 50 (5$ /�q y SECTION VIEW RIOR LDG FOOTPRINT - / ; 4 STAKED SILT FENCEF'0 / WD.POST AND HAY BALE LINE / - (56.6] WORK LIMIT LINE 60 - T.O.W. / 4 2- SEE DETAIL h� / -(58 0 ^ 57.8 1 I . I - I RK 40 FABRIC 4 I M / I 2 PROVIDE TEMPORARY M'H OR OTHER PLAN VIEW YY 0.�6 40 I SUITABLE EROSION C OL MEASURES 3 L �g6 0.N0. o ►E'1UM ONSTRUCTION. NTS Nti �"�-38 I METHOD FOR JOINING SILT FENCE SECTIONS _54 I / I I n POSITION ENO POSTS TO OVERLAP AS SHOWN I I I\ ABOVE,MAKING CERTAIN THAT FABRIC FOLDS /52 36 - � I / 36 I AROUND EACH POST AT LEAST ONE TURN 50 DRIVE POSTS TIGHTLY TOGETHER AND SECURE / 2 128 / TOPS OF POSTS WITH CHORD OR WIRE TO 48 I 35.E 36 PREVENT FLOW-THROUGH OF BUILT-UP SEDIMENT AT JOINT. /46 NOTE: 3, WETLP.N FLAGS I I SC?' 1 1. EXCAVATE A 6"x 6"TRENCH ALONG SPECIFIED SILT FENCE LINE IMMEDIATELY /44 E4V15 I BY HA YN CONSULTING I 23 35,83 34 52� / �CK AFTER CLEARING AND GRUBBING IS COMPLETE AND INSTALL SILT FENCE. /- �\µ/' 6/21/0 ((( SME 2. UNROLL SILT FENCE ONE SECTION AT A TIME.POSTS SHOULD BE POSITIONED ON R4 C'F .74 I �LW2 51 DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE. I EYII 4RPLC / 3. DRIVE POST INTO GROUND AND LAY THE TOE-IN FABRIC IN BOTTOM OF TRENCH. ET'24CHK \ 1 QT 3319 1 I I BACKFlLL TRENCH,AND TAMP GROUND AS SHOWN IN DIAGRAM ABOVE. 0 AT THE i �'3 / I 4. REMOVE SILT AND DEBRIS BEFORE ONE FOOT ACCUMULATION OCCURS FENCE UNE. / 58 I 33.37y 5 SILT FENCE INSTALLATION EW33 EN.2 / I 33.844 I I I 1.. - 1,- 0" fbCHK i a I ' PROPOSED GRADING & LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SCALE 1"a 30' - (IN FEET) i Inch 30 It 1 - vIV I m ' ON FIRE HYDRANT EL. 71.42 / I IN CENTER KISLANDE EL�71.23 I / / INDEPENDENCE DRIVEN PB. 293 PG. 62 & DB. 4036 PG. 119 246.1 1' I I I fE I TS 62.0 / g I I �b I Ir-316.29' I I INV. 60.0 ( \ ^1 g F EXTERNALLY I o \ UT SIGN 12" HOPE CPR AT 0.5% MIN. I \I I CONNECTING 4' DIA. AREA DRAINS 3' SUMP, RIM ELEVATIONS- 62.0t 36.0• /1- ADi CONNECT TO ROOF DRYWELLS FILTER FABRIC BET. FRAME &GRATES (11 W UNTIL ALL AREAS STABILIZED. ///I a'X4'OR I---------------- I 1 -------------------r ---1 I to ELEV. SCHEDULE I/ Mr,2z If d] NAME RIM CL INV. l/ A01 62.0 59.0 A040,1-o ll _ ANINE'A REq 30'XI W 20' F' AD2 62.0 58.7 Ito /0'I 1500 GAL. H-0 EP C ANK / I I I Q I' - STORMWATER ( / A03 62.0 58.2 / LEACHING I 1 AD4 62.0 57.7 II 1 I _ 95'X6' GRASS LINED I I I 4 ADS 62.0 57.2 /I Il3i L P r' T SWALE TO ^ INV. 51 2�� p AD6 62.0 56.7 m lI Itu I • 11M VE FL W p AD7 60.0 56.2 ti ///2 H-20 DBO I / 7 g• S N U o;co Co , II Iry 15,300 SF FOOTPRINT oo'j I /oW 2 (III I I a I U t; /�, FFLR 60.2 j I /�W I • 53. j� It y I ADS Q� � �J� 2 //ll j � •11 �l '¢ IN51.4 • • �Il Ila �l 4i O JO TS 55.0 (/lf 1�ll 120 LO _ SEPTIC LEACHING CHAMBER I� I I U?j ., INV. 53.0 /1 0• 20ryEl (5) 500 GAL. H-20 CHAMBERS/ - } to / / 0 1 WITH 4' STONE I • - 0 1 1� / ' 1 ,C i 1 AD I o \co COgp NC.I VE 6"SCH40 PVC 1 I / a_ •ll�) SIX INCH GAT BENCH AT 2%FROM I 1 TS 53.9 14 Ib I I I CK DRAIN TO LEACH PIT INV. 51. /yam l0 1 111 1j♦L o� DRAIN VALVE LILINETRENCH I I - • I J \ �� GUARDRAIL • 1$0 / I 1 MASS DPW M8.07.0 IM 56.9 �A 56. --TyPE 5524" TS 54.5 TS 5 1 qp // _ ■ BERM ■1LINV51.8 IN V 1.8 / Ile I / STAKED SILT FENCE 1i� / ■ 5� AND HAY BALE LINE //lam__�<� 59.5 ■ ./(J/ I j I 1 WORK LINE l\�/ / 15 56.5 LEGEND: SEE DETAIL INV 54.5 WORK \ J I 1 TOP Ml C/ .RIM 55. 1 r # POST LIGHT STRUCT4EB U/ye INV. 52.1 Q CATCH BASIN 4k.5Er 53, O SEWER MANHOLE O DRAINAGE MANHOLE W- .WATER LINE DRAINAGE LINE 07 LEACHING PIT 6'XI4' 1 I LANDSCAPE TREE 3"CAL MIN. / �� I BENCHMARK: SPIKE SE[ I I RED M LE / \ I ELEVATION 35.83 • JUNIPERUS CMNENSIS 'SEA GREEN' 3 GAL(74) 30,0• I I HrD�RANT' 30.0' -1 WETLAND FLAGS I _ / SCT14CK I / '8F BY HAMLYN CONSULTING I / I / 12'XI2'FENCED DUMP5IER + s CK 6/21/01 I / ---[ez}- PROPOSED CONTOUR I \ 77.0 PROPOSED SPOT MADE I � -82- EXInNG CONTOUR E%ISTING UTILITY POLE ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL PAINTED STRIPING 9'X79' PROPOSED UTILITIES PLAN SCALE:I'-30' SOIL TEST 30 o T. w no otf 508-362-4541 ©20D7 DCE (IN FEET) fax 506 362-9880 O DRAFTER:DAD DATE: 1-12-05 1 1Dch m 30 R. _ -� SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS O�OWn cape en in eerie lnC. GRADING, LANDSCAPE &UTILITIES CHKD BY: AH0 REV.: 6-10-05 P 9 g� L,, („I #755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE DESIGN: DAO REV.: 9-16-OS (CCC COMMENTS) C/UlL ENGINEERS o CA BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS 1" = 30' REV.: 7-18-06 (CONCOM FILING) LAND SURVEYORS Co PREPARED FOR JDJ HSG.DEV.LLC C/0 KELLER CO. PERMIT SET:NOT FOR REV.: 10-3-06 (SPR COMMENTS) - 939 Main Street YARM0U7NPORT, MASS. U 0i 683C MAIN STREET,OSTERYILLE.MA 01-3388ASEreV9C.DW REV.: 2-21-07 BLDG FOOTPRINT) VENT WITH CHARGDAL 24"CAST IRON COVER 24 LA 'H-20 CAST IRON COVER FILTER IN PUNTER H-20(TYPJ H-20 RATED F&C FINISHED ISLAND ;6' EVEAL BLOCK UP D-BO%.2{1.0.RISERMPON OVER STONEC LAB�ELEED*SEWER'TO GRADE WHERE INDICATED FRAME AND COVERS ALL COMPONENTSRISERS(TYP-) TOP OF CONCRETEALL2'0 COMPONENTSppECCASTLA.3 X.,. 14 Elm PRO 12'AT ZX 1500 GA'_H-20 56.80 JO'AT 1R e 4'OSCH40 PVC SEPTIC TWK GAS BAFFLE: 1 05CH40 PVC PIPES LEVEL 1ST 2' ACME OR EQUAL 23 AT 1.5% 4'05CN40 PVC 58.4 56.301 58 DO, H-20 500 CAL.LEACHING CHAMBER BY ACME PRECAST OR SHEA CONC.PRODUCTS DRY WELL 500 GAL H-20 OR EQUAL 5 UNITS REOUO2ED 6"GRAVEL&MECH. ACME DB5 H-20 OR EQUAL 3/4'-1-1 2 DOUBLE WASHED STONE d MIN. 21• AT SIDES AND 2.5'AT ENDS OF PRECAST STRUCTURES COMPACTION(TYPJ OVERALL DIMENSIONS TO OUTSIDE OF STONE:47.5'X 12.63' SEPTICPROFILE EL 49 TH2 BOTT.NGWE APPROX.SCALE 1/4'=1'-0" .. . SEPTICSYSTEM DESIGN DATA EL 32.94 AIJUSOD HIGH GROUNDWATER P811,013 TH2 PB11.013 330 RULE:12.8 ACRES(330)=4224 GPD DESIGN FLOW ALLOWED. TH1 DATE:5/10/05 11KK1 AM DATE:5/10/OS 11:A AM TIRE 5 FLOW; SOIL EVALUATOR DANIEL A OIAIA PLS,SE SOIL EVALUATTffl1R:CANi0.A.05 OIAU PLS,SE FIRST FLOOR OFFICEAOBBY: 3600 IF(75 GAL/1000 SF)-270 GPD WITNESS:DON DESMARIS RS.SE BON WITNESS:DON DESMARIS RS.SE BON - MEZZANINE OFFICE AREAS: 3600 SF(75 WL/1000 BF)-270 GPD EXCAVATOR:REED EWS EXCAVATOR:R13D EWS WAREHOUSE AREAS:15 GPD/PERSON(5 EMPLOYEES)-75 GPD EL 70.0 0' EL 62.0 0' NO GARBAGE DISPOSALS ALLOWED TOTAL DESIGN FLOW:815 GPO I /78.0 SEPTIC TANK:615 GPD(200%)-1230 GALLON RED.(1500 GAL.MIN.) 1 L MY J D AOYR 4 SAD USE ISOO GALLON Vi-20 SEPTIC TANK 6" 4 B NOPoZON B HORRON USE Cl LAYER CLASS 1 SOILS FOR LEACHING LOAMY SAND LOAMY SAND LEACHNG:615 GPD/0.]{GPD/SF=831 SF LEACHING AREA REOUIRED. NON WOVEN FILTER FABRIC BENEATH STONES 2.5 Y 6/3 2-5 Y 6/3 USE(5)6.5'X4.83'X 2'EFF.DEPTH IFACNING GALLEYS W//4'STONE EL 67.5 30' EL 59.0 36" AT SIDES AND 2.5-STONE AT ENDS(50.51'%12.83'OVERALL DIMENSIONS) BOTTOM CAPAGIY=47.5'X 12.83'-609 SF X 0.74=450 GPD SIDEWALL 2(47.5'+12.63')X 2.0'-241 5F X 0.74 178 GPO CI HORRON 850 IF 628 GPD O.K. TRACE SM 8'MIN.RIPRAP iLACE SILT 1.5 MIN. FIT N PLACE AND CHINKED Cl HORIZON fOYR 7/6 1 FILL GAPS WITH LOAM M/C SAND /&PLANT GROUND CEDAR EL 54.0 96' MR 7/6 C2 HORIZON M/C SWD I OYR TIES 64.2 ADJUST TO GRADE KNEENALL WITH BPoCK COURSES H-20 RATED F&C 8•HIGH 622 EL SILO NGWE 1µ' EL 49.0 NGWE 156" WITH 3/8'MORTAR JOINTS SEE DETNL / 82.0 \ CENTERLINE INVERT 8 US1ED-INVERT IN 60.2 TH3 IS.05'NIGHER DATE 5/10/OS 1t:A. AM JA OUTLET .05'LOWER SOIL EVALUA DM10.A OJAIA PLS,SE ----------- PROVIDE 2'SUMP IN. AN1 AD4 IXCAVATOR:ftBD EWS SOIL EVALUATOR DMIEL A OJAU PLS.SE 12"0 H-20 SMOOTH EL 53.0 0' DATE 3/21/02 9:00 PM TINED CORR.PL1S:lC PIPE INV.•S VARY SEE PUN 22 O EL 34.36 0 A ORGANIC LS 0- ---___-__ SLOPE AT IX I E LOAMY SAR0 3 (0.5%MIN.) B HORIZON I 3/2 5. ¢ {'-0' 8• LOAMY SAND MORTAR 2.5 Y fi/3 B HORIZON n� 6. EL 51.0 24" LOAMY /3 -JEl LEVATED GROUNDWATER 2.5 Y 6/3 EVATION 12.94 36" SLOPE STABILIZATION- WEST OF BLDG C,M SATIN GAMY SAND ' CONCRETE:4000 PSI MIN.AT 28 DAYS SCALE:1"-5' HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL(APPROX.) 5%GRAVEL AIW230 20NE D H-20 DESIGN LOADING Cl CHORIIZDON 60' 3/02 READING-25.9 SHEA CONCRETE PRODUCTS.INC.OR EQUAL ADJUSTMENT 7.2' MANHOLE 46"Dk STORM DIN 6'CHAIN LINK FENCE MOUND IOYR 7/6 C2 HORIZON AREA DRAIN DETAIL GATES A STORAGE AR MED sAFO GATES AS SHOWN. 2.SY]/4 M-20 RATED F&C SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MATEPIAlS NOT TO SCALE LeBARON LB268-3 H-20 OR EQUAL CONIC. OUARDFAIL 3'MN.PEASTONE MANHOLE MD COVERS BASE TO MASS°PER AND MIRAFl 4ONS LABELED bRAM MANUF.SPEC - 03.2" FASRIC OVER STONE DRILL 2 1"0 HOLES IN COVER /M90].0 EL 41.0 NGWE fµ EL 25.]d OBSEKVED GROUNDWATER &DOWN SIDES OF PITS FINISHED GROUND SURFACE WIDEN BERM TO 24"%8"AT BASINS SEE PLAN ANCHOR SYSIELI BY WALL DESIGNER EL 25.34 108" ADJUSTING BLOCKS/H-20 RISER SECOND 1000 GAL. MORTAR ALL COMPONENTS BAD SOIL DATA (T P.) A mp) 6'-I X 6'0 ° H-2p KEYSTONE(OR EQ.)RETAINING WALL H-�20 ,1 ie°ovaoa°e°a DRILL 2)1 tOpp CAL .°A• 1000 GAL ve°o' WITH GEOTEOIIE GRID AND GUARDRAIL SYSTEM IFAQHPIT e^�` LEACHPIT eg°`°^°°O^ MOLES ttP. (DESIGN BY OTHERS) SHOREY�1R EQUALED Sl1ORET OR EQ •° �ORICIN4L GROUND SURFACE V SCREENED LOAM 80'TO BUY! e$°ee;e;np-"e°°• °°°°°• ..•°°°°'e mlaee°4Yn;a,°°°°°°°°°e°.epe°°°°°°°.°.°.•e"=a°ems.° T -- /Hf0ROIEED WITH EROSION CONTROL MIX. °°\ 3/4"{1 1/2' _--_ -914'--UL J H-201000 GAL DOUBLE W HED STONE ° 3'%3'LEACHING TRENCH DOUBLE WASHED 5(ONE-/�.- -- -J ,BASINS 4'MIN. OUND PIT BETWEEN STRUCTURES WHERE SHOWN 4'MIN.MOUND PIT 3"MIN.PDlSTONE ___ ` SEE TRENCH CROSS SECTION TMIN MIRAF STONE 5ECSHOREY R E BOTTOM - _ I \ OVER &DOWN SIDES OF PITS STAKED SILT FENCE _ -r: - MRAD 149N DRAINAGE SYSTEM DETAIL REM SEE TO��PRo G (DESIGN TIBLLI'OTHERS) AND HAYBrLLES GRO SEE DETAIL Aorta UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FROM BENEATH ALL rNo SCALE: LEACHING STRUCTURES AND REPLACE WITH J'PFASTOHE DUEP PRE 12"0 SL-ED H-20 1"=5'HORIZ.AND VERTICAL APPROX. CLEAN COMPACTED SANG. ALL FILL TO BE PLACED IN BY LIFTS CORRUFATED HOPE PRE COMPACTED TO 95X PROCTOR DENSITY Ao5 N-Ix OR Co- BY 10 TON MIN.VIBRATORY D ROLLE ROLLER. .>6'-1s DOuIYE ENCLEAN ANGINEER TO DNSCOFILE. NL.SITE WORN. WASHED STONE r C.I.RING&COVER e'e�8^eye°Zp LEBMON LA0910 OR ED.OVER TRENCH DRAIN CLEAN TO GRADE ' '• NEENAH FOUNDRY PROVIDE 6'PVC BALL VALVE TRENCH CROSS SECTION A-A R-4996-A3 SERIES SHUT OFF WITH RISER 6•LOAM&SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT PAVED. Mg TYPE M TRENCH WITH H-20 / TO GRADE ON TRENCH DRAIN LINE GRATED COVER OR APPROVED EQUAL CONCRETE FOR PAVEMENT'MDFW CEMENT CONCRETE(AIR E TRAINED 4000 PSI 3/4-W.,610) SET TO LINE AND GRADE INDICATED 12'X 3' ON SITE PLAN \ CCBERM I'TOPCOAT MASS DPW CONCRETE PAD:BROOM FINISH,EXP.JOINTS 24'O.C. TYPE II +4 BAR$72 O.C.EW. ALL CONCRETE WORN 3'QEAR TO CONFORM TO MI CODE 2'BINDER 1/2 GREASE PINS AT IXP.JDDTIS. SEE CONIC. m� •. n ..� .. ..• ..". PAVEMENT °$e2 L SECTION fi"SCH40 PVC °e n• .... .. •. 12 PROCESSED GRAVEL FOR LOADING AREA �S.. O O 00 O o O O 000 O O O O O MASS MAX.W M1.03.1 COMPACTED TO EXTEND GRAVEL 6"MIN./Hasa ° 12'PROCESSED GRAVEL o O o O O o o O O O O 95% A DRY DENSITY MOD.PROCTOR 0 0 0 000 D O O O O O O O O O PAST EDGE PAVE .DPW M1.03.1 R.ROLLER COMPACTED eQOQ00000OOQO�o0000O0 OQOp Oo00 /W11H VIBRATORY ROLLER. TRENCH DRAIN VALVE DETAIL REMOVE TOP&SUBSOIL REMOVE TOP AND SUBSOIL IF REO. COMPACT SUBGRADE COMPACT SUBGRADE WITH VIBRATORY NOTE:REMOVE FROST SUSCEPTIBLE MATERIAL ROLLER.ALL FILL COMPACTED IN 6'UFTS. TO A DEPTH OF 38"BELOW FINISHED GRADE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT CROSS SECTION H-20 PRECAST RISER REPLACE WITH NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE MATERIAL 24'I.D. (LESS THAN 10%PASSING#200 SIEVE) NOT M SCALE-DETAIL FOR LOADING DOCK AREA ONLY MORTAR ALL COMPONENTS(IYPJ PAVEMENT CROSS SECTION , NOT TO SCALE V-10" Q 26' 33 1/4' 24 1/4" EWE 2•-r rmmLR TITLE 1 (IDW wtMu xD06 vAt�lt'IYL» 24' MoFloEloOoDEI UI.J9 or] M LeBMON,BROCK70N,MA MODEL:ODEL LI( LE b LABEL S OR DRAIN AS APPROPRIATE WEIGHT: LEI S 5 ❑ohoo[�o o oQ� LYIQt o a9 A �jo TYPICAL ACCESS COVER V ❑ 0 0 0 0 N � SCALE:3/4'v Y-o' p �1Rcm o BIJ>X aRem LOCATION OF TEES MUST BE 1 ❑ ❑O❑� Q NVIdNVD 12 W�DIRECTLY UNDER OPENING. -I n I SUPPORT WITH STAINLESSSTRAP \' n TO RISER. I ) \1 I6EWPM.W DDS 6DAil I 1 \\ 11 W MED SM%E I \\ J SM1ES DYJ2 1 2'a _ MWN61I 2 I/xS2 1/x1m' I 1/a" 4 1/2" \\ 11 SDO,[D -D•FRW RRIX. \\ 11 N¢5 IXVEN AT A=A19 FOURTH FLANGE AT BASINS \\ 11 PN1m 1TRBgt 1RIX iiGff WITHOUT CURB INLET \\ /) 4'-0• 21.3 1, 1 MNrDl,, XR 0- YH 3/4' 24" 3'00T1 91RDBFD BWIt YLLDI EO@h KIP WIDEN BERM TO 18'%6'AT SL0 B' C DPW PROP.H-20 F&C 18" /BASINS&LOW S 4 1/2' P.) FINISH COURSE IDE(TY SECTION A-A AEU - r..." 2'X 2'GRATE UBARON LF248-2 OR EQ. 12' 12' MINIMUM FRAME WEIGHT: 3-FLANGE-265 LBS. MN 4-FLANGE-295 LISS. MINIMUM GRATE WEIGHT: 215 LESS. > ! ^ TREE PLANTING DETAIL PASS AREA: 255 S0.IN, TEE LOCATION NOT TO SCALE N.T.S. FRAME AND GRATE ADJUSTING COURSES AS RE(�•D. MORTAR ALL COMPONENTS(TYP.) BINDER COURSE COLLAR DETAIL 1 - 1•- O" CONCRETEECOLIAR FULL 12 /2' NOT TO SCALE off 508-362-4541 WITH BASE COAT ASPHALT fox 508 362-9880 ©2007 OCE 3000 PSI CLASS 1 MIN. DRAFTER:DAO DATE: 1-12-05 I _ SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS CJO Wn CO e en %neenn In C. ICHKD BY: AHO REV.: 6-10-05 P 9 9• m I DETAIL SHEET I C J #755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE DESIGN: DAD REV.: 9-16-05 (CCC COMMENTS) CIVIL ENGINEERS o BARNDEPE, DENMASS CH DRIVE ETTS V = 40• REV.: 7-18-06 CONCOM FILING LAND SURVEYORS m PREPARED FOR JDJ HSG.DEV.LLC C/O KELLER CO. PERMIT SET:NOT PoR REV.: 10-3-06 (SPIT COMMENTS) - N BAR MAIN STREET,OSTERVILLE.MA 939 Main Street YARMOUTHPORT, MASS. �0 01-3368ASErev9C.DW REV.: 2-21-07 BLDG FOOTPRINT) ' s a s I I i i i I i IND�PENDENC DRIVE ' II WAY p 9 41 L.O. I I I EA§ N SHOW Al 1 BENCHMARK:TOP OF SPINDLE / N / ON FIRE HYDRANT EL 71.42 24 .11 I PB. 3 ^e6 N c EL n. I � & D B ry� I I TS 62.0bb /is t 4 �0 3♦ I ' INV.80.0 12'HOPE CPP AT 0.5%MIN. 168) bb CO NEC G 4'OIA.AREA DRAINS 3'SUMP,RIM ELEVATIONS=62.02 CONNECT TO ROOF DRYWELLS FILTER FABRIC BET.FRAME&GRATES � 6 UNTIL ALL AREAS STMILIZED. /� 4 �q• R '� _ 7 I 1 ELE,SCHEDULE 2500 SF OF V ROCK STRUC. COVERINO 1:1.5 CUT NAME RIM CL INV.SLAPS.FILTER FABRIC Gil AD 62 59.0 F' AD 2 82.0 58.0 "PPLANTSG OUND CEDAR 74'n 74 76 8 `5f MWA / 64 68� , 1 AD3 62.0 56.2 / S 6262- .0 Cl)T/] ADS .0 AD 62.0 56.7 Sit AD7 GOO 56.2 se04 / TS ,a' W J O 64 (•/ �3ig$ SIX INCH GA M �5 ," q8\•'.'• I �++ O ,/ 3\ V�N UNE CH P •e. m 8 / I \ / . -62 // QO]P�MP _ S5 24 n 54 • 6 • RIOR AO mF=(J 81.0 BERM 1 A �5 STAKED SILT FEN AND HAY BALE UN9.s WO I RK LIMIT UN ' m 60 6.5 SEE DETAIL TOP / KK M S5. _ •p.ae I / ryE 10- I I .52♦., INV sib 7ZR '� 10 I 3 f I 3e _s4 $ / I /52 5 6—�� n }es.ls I� 36 I 'I 45 � �I � `I BEN ILMARI(:SPI � I I e � �q4 U Br vN coNsu�nNc HAn� y + ETe4 6/21/0 / I ea. 6e I m Nmm 0 m SITE PLAN WITH SECTIONS INDICATED c0 Z r-Z (ALL FEANR6 SHOWN) z O I- z scALE:r=40, p _O 2 A r Z7 oO C c m e r- 1 O (Zr1 U) Z (n 0 I rn -� 140 130 120 110 100 ROP FOC TINGS 90 IN SOUTH 80 70 60 EMON ROUND 50 40 FLR EL 60.2 REM, 30 DATUM ELEV 20.00 BY OTHERS. ' o Iri N ri ro N r 6 n n n eMn n r r r m N n M M 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 SECTION THRU BUILDING SCALE:1'.Q'HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL 140 130 120 110 ----- 100 _ 90 80 70 60 RS 50 40 30 20 20.00 a m Tv rn M m uL a O, w m r n r n m 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 SECTION THRU WEST SINGLE POLE LINE SCALE:1'-40'HORIZONTAL AND VERRGL 6 100 ————— SOEXIN MR 20 20.00 M a o m a m n rvr M n n n n no � vri v1 a n ron n n n 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 SECTION THRU WEST DOUBLE POLE LINE SCALE.1'.40'HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL 0 ©2007 ODE 1.X 508 362-9880 O DRAFTER:DAD DATE: 1-12-05 m SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS DETAIL SHEET 2 CHKD BY: AHO REV.: 6-10-05 O'O Iv, cape engineering, i c, rn I CA 4755 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE DESIGN: DAD REV.: 9-16-05 (CCC COMMENTS) CIVIL ENGINEERS o LJ BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS 1 = 40' REV.: 7-18-06 CONCOM FILING LAND SURVEYORS PERMIT SET:NOT FOR REV.: 10-3-06 SPR COMMENTS Co PREPARED FOR JDJ HSG.DEV.LLC C/O KELLER CO. 939 Moir! Street — YARMOUTHPORT, MASS. �' 683C MAIN STREET,OSTERMLLE,MA 01-3386ASErev9C.DW REV.: 2-21-07 BLDG FOOTPRINT)