Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0255 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE (2)_______________ ,iI e 2Ie ii: , --\\s, CTIVE 4.. 4.1 4 11 1 4 iti 4 4. 4. 4 .. ,. .. 4. („11:). ,, 4 . . ,, o 4r v �r , ..,. 4 v a" P Eta rt rr . ' ' c ;"..4'‘. ''' ,' , ',1 ' ' ' , V , „ t ' 1 '441 ' '``. ''''' , .„ rr �J } 1 d•_ +. ''y. rs z o M^w u> r PROJECT NAME: �x-k ! o� ADDRESS: E k C E' I ft- . 11r-Pploadertc&el)v-, PERMIT# PERMIT DATE: 1 M/P: -D s / CO a LARGE ROLLED PLANS •ARE IN. BOX ��n SLOT pi Data entered in MAPS program on:. 1 �� BY: q/wpfiles/forms/archive i<pw VvL44. I h ca.�-e �• ,q k A,v.e . ,z at t hem °C) :Mr I • nv)...,; (4a 1122520 RPG,Inc. Town of Barnstable Legal Department - Town Attorneys' Office 367 Main Street, Hyannis MA 02601-3907 Inter-Office Memorandum Robert D. Smith, Town Attorney Office: 508-862-4620 Ruth J. Weil, 1st Assistant Town Attorney Fax: 508-862-4724 Claire Griffen, Paralegal/Legal Assistant T. David Houghton, Assistant Town Attorney Terri Cahalane, Legal Clerk Date: May 16, 2001 To: Elbert C. Ulshoeffer, Jr. Building Commissioner From: Robert D. Smith, Town Attorney Ruth J. Weil, 1st Assistant Town Attorney Subject: Inquiry as to Whether a Doctor's Office is a Permitted as a "Professional Office" in the Industrial Zone Legal Ref. #2001-0081 You have asked us to respond to the following question: "In the past, I've made decisions that medical offices i.e. doctors' offices, hospitals, nursing homes are not allowed in the Industrial zoning district. I am inclined to once again make this decision, on my reasoning, that the construction of the ordinance by "specifically mentioning" and allowing as a matter of right medical office, clinic, treatment facilities, laboratories, etc. in the SD-1, HO and PR zones and excluding along with doctors practice as home occupations medical offices within the HB zone (see sections 3.2.1(1) and 3.3.7, 3.3.6 and 3.3.9) establishes the limits of where they are permitted and therefore prohibits these uses in the Industrial district. Additionally, within zoning districts, what might be considered as synonymous meanings/uses; office, professional office, government offices, business offices, medical office are separately mentioned and excluded or permitted within the same zoning district thereby leading me to believe that there is intent to distinguish by differences, degree or 1 • • • definition their meanings (e.g. 1(A), 3- and uses section 3-3.7 B • ( )� 3.8(1)(B);3-3.9(A), (B); 3-4.1(1)(D). I understand that you were given case laws and a memorandum by Attorney David Lawler representing the Independence Medical Arts Trust, who is presently before the Site Plan Review panel. I informed Attorney Lawler that I would forward to you my thoughts and request that you express your opinion on the case law relative to the correctness of my decision as it relates to section 3-4.2(1)(A)(E): Independence Medical Arts Trust will be back before Site Plan Review within the next few weeks. Therefore, a written response, as quick as possible, would be appreciated. If your opinion does not reflect legal support for my reasoning, please cc the Planning office since they are of the same mind as Building." Based upon a memorandum submitted by the attorney representing "Independence Drive Medical Arts", we understand that the use being proposed in the Industrial (IND) District is doctors' offices and specifically not a treatment facility or a clinic or nursing home. Our response is, therefore, confined to the question of whether doctors' offices are a permitted use in the Industrial (IND) zoning district. As you are aware, the permitted uses in the Industrial (IND) District are as follows: • 3-4.2 IND Industrial District Uses: The following Principal Permitted uses are permitted in the • IND District: A) Any use permitted in the B District. B) Lumber, fuel and.ice establishments. C) Contractors' yards. D) Manufacturing and industrial uses. 2 E) Any use permitted in the S&D District. F) Recreation Ice Rink Facilities (added on March. 11, 1999 by an 11 Yes unanimous vote of the Town Council). G) Specifically prohibited are petroleum refineries, landfills, resource recovery facilities, sewerage treatment facilities which process and discharge less than tertiary-treated effluent, and any other use which involves as a principal activity the manufacture, storage, use, transportation or disposal of toxic or hazardous. materials. (emphasis supplied) The uses permitted in the "B" Business District are as follows: 3-3.1 B, BA and UB Business Districts 1) Principal Permitted Uses: The following uses are permitted in the B,'BA and UB Districts: A) Retail.and wholesale store/salesroom. B) Retail trade service or shop. C)' Office and bank. D) Restaurant and other food establishment. E) Place of business of baker, barber, blacksmith, builder, carpenter, caterer, clothes cleaner or presser, confectioner, contractor, decorator, dressmaker, dyer, electrician, florist, furrier, hairdresser, hand laundry, manicurist, mason, milliner, newsdealer, optician, painter, paper hanger,- photographer, plumber, printer, publisher, roofer, shoemaker, shoe repairer, shoe shiner, tailor, tinsmith, telephone exchange, telegraph office, undertaker, upholsterer, wheelwright. F) Gasoline and oil filling stations and garages. G) Hotel/motel subject to the provisions of Section 3-3.1.(6) herein, except that hotels/motels shall be prohibited in the BA District and prohibited in the Osterville UB District. H) Any other ordinary business use of a similar nature. 3 t • a(apartments) to the provisions of I) Multi family dwellings ( p ) subject Section 3-2.1(1)(J)(a) through (h) except that multi-family dwellings shall be prohibited in the BA District. J) Single family residential structure (detached), except that single family residential structures shall not be permitted in the B District. (Added by a 9 Yes 2 No vote of the Barnstable Town Council on Feb. 20, 1997). 2) Accessory Uses: The uses permitted in the S & D District are as follows: 1) Principal Permitted Uses: The following uses are permitted in the S & D District: A) Retail store B) Professional/business office. C) Bank D) Personal service store/shop. E) Warehouse and distribution facility. F) Servicing, storing and a processing of goods in transit. G) Facilities for service-type trades, including shops and storage yards. 2) Accessory Uses: The following uses are permitted as accessory uses in the S&D district. A) Offices, garages and related facilities for uses listed as Principal Permitted Uses in Section 3-3.7(1) herein. 3) Conditional Uses: C) Windmills and other devices for the conversion of wind energy to electrical or mechanical energy, but only as an accessory use 4) Special Permit Uses: (Reserved for future use) While your question identifies the fact that there are contained in several recently-adopted amendments to the zoning ordinance, provisions in which 4 medical offices, dental offices and clinics are listed separately from business, professional and governmental offices as permitted uses (see Sections 3-3.7 and 3-3.9 of the zoning ordinance), your question does not address the fact that the term "professional offices" are also listed as permitted uses in other sections of the zoning ordinance, without either any separate mention of medical offices or any specific definition of the term "professional offices" being provided. See, 3- 3.5 VB-A and VB-B Business Districts; Section 3-3.8 S&D Service and Distribution District. See also, APT Asset Management, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of Melrose, 50 Mass. App. Ct. 133 (2000); Melrose Wakefield Hospital Association v. Board of Appeals of Melrose, 31 Mass. App.,Ct. 923 (1991). These provisions were adopted much earlier than the provisions to which you refer. Terms used in a zoning by-law should be interpreted in the context of the by-law as a whole and, to the extent consistent with common sense and practicality, they should be given their ordinary meaning. See Rando v. Board of Appeals of Bedford, 348 Mass. 296, 297-298 (1965). "Ordinarily, if the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous it is conclusive as to legislative intent ... However, time and again we have stated that we should not accept the literal meaning of the words of a statute without regard for that statute's purpose and history.", Oxford v. Oxford Water Co., 391 Mass. 581, 587-588 (1984). In researching how the term "professional offices" had been historically used in the zoning ordinance, it is difficult to conclude that in 1974 when the 5 . provisionreferencing professional offices was included in the S & D section of the zoning ordinance that the legislative body intended to exclude medical offices from the "ordinary" meaning of the term "professional offices".1 Specifically, in 1974, the zoning bylaw was amended to include the following language: K. USE REGULATIONS- NON RESIDENCE DISTRICTS 11. Service and Distribution e. Retail Store, professional or business offices, bank, personal service stores or shops; by special permit, full service restaurants and delicatessens may be permitted. At the time that this amendment was adopted, the "residence" use regulations of the zoning bylaw contained the following definition of professional or home occupation use: I. USE REGULATIONS- RESIDENCE DISTRICT. 13. The term "professional or home occupation use" as used in paragraphs 3, 7, 9 and 11 above shall be defined and limited as follows: a. The use shall include offices for professional use and customary home occupations such as arts, crafts, service businesses, antique shops and gift shops. b. The operator of the use must have his principal home or dwelling on the premises. c. The use must be conducted in the dwelling or accessory building. '/The applicant's attorney urges the position that"office"as used in the"B"district includes medical offices. The conclusion reached herein that medical offices as presented by the applicant (no'tto include a clinic) are permitted in the IND district is based on the fact that all uses - - S&D zone are allowed in the IND district and that the IND zones specifically permits"professional offices." 6 d. Regular employees shall be limited to those persons whose principal home or dwelling is on the premises and one other employee. This provision shall not apply to physicians, surgeons or dentists which professions required clerical and medical assistants. e. No external change in the structure of existing buildings shall be permitted. f. Any new structures shall be constructed so as to appear residential in character. g. Adequate off street parking must be provided. The principle of statutory construction that the mention of one matter excludes all other matters not mentioned, "...is applicable only where in the natural association of ideas the contrast between a specific subject matter which is not mentioned leads to the inference that the latter was not intended to be I included in the sweep of the statute." Bristol County v. Secretary of Commonwealth, 324 Mass. 403 (1949). Looking at the statute as a whole and its legislative history, there does not appear to be a legislative intent to exclude medical offices from the definition of"professional offices" in every zoning district where the term "professional" offices appears.2 See Framingham Clinic, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Framingha , 382 ss. 283 (1981).3 That being probably would be worthwhile for the Town Council, Planning Board and 2/ We do not believe that the above analysis is affected by the fact that in 1995 the zoning ordinance was amended to exclude"medical and dental"practices from customary home occupations. See 4-1.4 Home Occupation 3/ Unlike the Framingham bylaw where clinics were not separately mentioned within the zoning bylaw, Barnstable's zoning ordinance does distinguish between professional offices and clinics. See Sections 3-2.1(c)&(g)(PR Professional Residential District)(adopted in 1970); 3-3.7;(HO Highway Office). 7 Planning Department to work cooperatively to analyze the various zoning districts in which the term "professional" offices is listed as a permitted use to ascertain whether any further definition of that term is desirable from a land use prospective. We trust that this is responsive to your inquiry. cc: Royden Richardson, Town Council President Raymond Lang, Chair, Planning Board John Klimm, Town Manager Jacqueline Etsten, Interim Planning Director 8 • Ulshoeffer, Elbert From: Weil Ruth To: Smith Robert; Ulshoeffer, Elbert Subject: RE: Response to question concerning professional office use in the IND zoning district Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:37AM I appreciate your suggestion. However, I believe that the response, as currently framed, analyzes the question in a manner which I feel is appropriate. I will transmit the document in "hard copy". Thanks. From: Ulshoeffer, Elbert To: Weil Ruth Subject: RE: Response to question concerning professional office use in the IND zoning district Date:Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:24PM Ruth, on pg 7 last sentence after the words that being said insert " it would appear that there is not legal support for you reasoning " I think that the question then is answered for the imediate and future Commissioner. From:Weil Ruth To: Ulshoeffer, Elbert Cc: Houghton, David; Smith Robert Subject: Response to question concerning professional office use in the IND zoning district Date: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:37AM As per our discussion of earlier today, attached please find our proposed response to the question you posed regarding the above. We will await distributing it until we hear from you . Thanks.<<File Attachment: response.doc>> Page 1 • • „ Town of Barnstable . . • .17/ �s °� Regulatory Services ,to, R gu ry �� Thomas F.Geiler,Director 9`� i6 `�/ Division 'QED MA'S M Building Elbert C Ulshoeffer,Jr. Building Commissioner 367 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 January 4,2001 Patrick M.Butler . Nutter,McClennen&Fish,LLP • PO Box 1630 Hyannis,MA 02601 Re: Your letter,dated January 2,2001 (#13162-380)regarding Cape Cod Health Care,Inc. Our File: Hadaway Road Dear Attorney Butler: . I have read the above referenced letter,consulted with planning officials and have come to the conclusion that your contention,with regard to a nursing home being an allowed use in the Industrial zone,is one that ultimately,if you choose to proceed,must be decided by the Zoning Board of Appeals. • As related during our meeting in December,I am of the opinion that construction and interpretation of zoning ordinances must be clear enough that the public can have a reasonable certainty of meanings and to distinguish uses I that are allowed without manipulation. Where the Zoning Ordinances specifically allow nursing home uses as a matter of right(as in Section 3.2.1)or by special permit(as in Section 3.1.5)then by omission of the term"nursing homes"in other zones,I must interpret that the intent of the ordinance is to prohibit. To reason otherwise,subjects the public to whimsical and perhaps capricious interpretations of the Zoning Ordinances. Furthermore,I cannot reach the same conclusion;that you imply to be appropriate,that Section 3.3.1,"Any other ordinary business use of a similar nature"would include a nursing home as an allowed use in an Industrial zone. I do agree that health care is an industry but cannot agree that its function is"industrial"as commonly defined nor an ordinary business use similar in nature to those of Section 3.3.1 B,(1)(A)through(G). For all the reasons above stated I must decline to issue a letter confirming a long-term care facility(nursing home) as an allowed use within the Industrial zone. With regard to your request for a determination that you be required to apply for a special permit pursuant to Section 4.4.5,nothing in your letter indicates any prior non-conforming use functions. However,if a principle use exists that is a non-conforming use than Section 4.4.5 would allow you to proceed to the Zoning Board of Appeals. If I have not answered your questions totally or you need further clarification,please do not hesitate to call. Sincerel7, eC-4171.-‘1e.', r. Building Commissioner cc: John Klimm,Town Manager Jackie Etsten,Principal Planner Robert Smith,Town Attorney 4010104a MEMORANDUM Independence Drive Medical Arts Assessor's Map: 294 Parcel: 70-170-4-13 Property Address: 70 and 100 Independence Drive Hyannis, MA 70 Airport Road Hyannis, MA ISSUE: ZONING The above referenced proposal is for the intended renovation of a 44,918 sq. ft. building consisting of 27,748 sq.ft. of office space and 17,170 sq. ft. of manufacturing space. The intended renovation will reduce the manufacturing space to approximately 10, 000 sq. ft. with the remaining portion of the building being offices both corporate and medical. All parcels on the property are contained within the Industrial District (IND),which is governed by Sec. 3-4.2 of the Town of Barnstable ZoningOrdinances. n ances. This section provides that principal permitted uses include " (Subsection A) Any use permitted in the B District and, (Subsection E) any use permitted in the S &D District." In referencing Section 3-3.1, you will note that Sub- Section E offers a long list of uses including optician, which are permissible within the B District. In addition, Subsection H provides that"Any other ordinary business use of a similar nature"is permissible in a B District. The proposed use of the subject building for medical offices is in a similar nature to the use of a building by an optician and the other listed uses such as a barber or hairdresser. These uses are similar in that clients arrive at the particular place of business by appointment. Section 3-3.8 (B) of the Code specifically provides that "professional/business office"is a permitted use within the S &D District Though the term"professional/business office"is not defined within the ordinance the ordinary use of the term"professional"includes physicians as a matter of law. It has long been established by Massachusetts law that when a term is not defined in a statute or code that the courts will apply to that term its usual and accepted meaning. This interpretation is also applied by the courts in zoning cases as demonstrated in The Building Inspector of Mansfield v. Christopher Curvin 22Mass. App. Ct. 401. In this case the court stated that when a statute does not specifically define a term, the courts will look to common sources such as other legal contexts (other statutes) and dictionaries in order to define the term. In the present case the term"professional"is undefined, as such we must look to other sources to define the term. Black's Law Dictionary defines "Professional" as "a vocation or occupation requiring special, usually advanced, education and skill; eg law or medical professions." The term"Professional"is defined in Webster's New World Dictionary as "vocation or occupation requiring advanced education and training and involving intellectual skills as medicine, law, theology, engineering, teaching, etc." Since both the legal and common definitions of professional provide Medicine as a profession, it is conclusive as a matter of law that the medical offices can be constructed within the Industrial zone. In addition to the above, it is important to note that if the drafters of the Ordinance intended that medical office space not be allowed within the Industrial zone they would have specifically precluded it. This is shown by the fact that the drafters of the Ordinance specifically precluded medical offices within this the HB District. Section 3-3.6(1)(A)provides"Office, but not including medical office." Again, where the drafters prohibit a specific use in one area it is conclusive evidence that their failure to prohibit it in another area is intentional on their part. Finally,it has come to the attention of the applicant that the Town has concerns as to whether or not the medical office space would be designated at a"clinic"not as professional office space. The applicant is not proposing to convert the building into a clinic but rather renovate the existing business offices into medical office space. The term"Clinic"is also not defined within the Ordinance and again based upon the law we must look to the legal or common usage of the term clinic The Building Inspector of Mansfield at 402. This legal usage is clearly defined in Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 111 § 52 as "clinic shall not include a medical office building, or one or more practitioners engaged in a solo or group practice whether conducted for profit or for not-profit." This definition is consistent with the applicant's intended use of the property for an orthopedic medical practice. It is not a clinic,which based upon its common usage would refer to an institution where individuals would come seek treatment without an appointment and is generally associated with a hospital. Webster New World Dictionary defines clinic as "a facility associated with a hospital that treats chiefly out patients." Again, the applicant is not seeing out patients, but would see individuals on an appointment basis only, and has no association with the hospital whatsoever. As a matter of law the proposed medical offices are to be considered professional offices and not a clinic. It is respectfully requested that the Board approve the applicant's usage of the premises for medical office space. Respectfully submitted, Independence Medical Arts Trust By Its Attorney, David V. Lawler, Esquire 336 South Street Hyannis,MA 02601 (508) 778-0303 ► ‘10;1*-41-k_4), BAR CAPE COD COMMISSION 1/0l 3225 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 226 Wiz'' = ;��''c3 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 `y „'Ol tS' (508)362-3828 SS ,,, //////„'llfj1' FAX(508)362-3136 ACHUS� E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org DATE: January 23,2003 TO: Michael D. Ford,Esq. Stinson & Ford PO Box 665 West Harwich,MA 02671 FROM: Cape Cod Commission RE: Hardship Exemption Cape Cod Commission Act, Section 23 Applicant: Independence Medical Arts LLC PROJECT# HDEX/CU02028 PROJECT: Independence Medical Arts 100 Independence Drive Hyannis,MA 02601 BOOK/PAGE 14427/42; 14427/284,Land Court Certificate#163360 14427/282,Land Court Certificate#163359 DECISION OF THE CAPE COD COMMISSION SUMMARY The Cape Cod Commission(Commission) hereby approves with conditions the Hardship Exemption application of Independence Medical Arts,LLC pursuant to Section 23 of the Cape Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 1 C� f Cod Commission Act(Act),c.716 of the Acts of 1989,as amended. The decision is rendered pursuant to a vote of the Commission on January 23,2003. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of the previously completed conversion of approximately 26,000 square feet (s.f.) of general office space and research and development (R&D) space to medical office space within an existing 46,000 s.f building located on a 7.81 acre site on Independence Drive within the B-Business district of Hyannis.The applicant intends to convert an additional 9200 s.f. of remaining R&D space to medical office in the near future. Local permits have not been issued for this later phase of the conversion. According to the applicant,the site contains 1.23 acres of wetland.The project is substantially complete and is open for business. The applicant purchased the land and the existing building at 100 Independence Drive on November 8,2001. Prior to the purchase,the building housed Sentinel packaging company and contained a mix of sales offices and R&D space. After obtaining the necessary permits from the town of Barnstable,the applicant converted approximately 17,800 s.f of the existing sales offices and 8000 s.f. of the R&D space of to medical office use (and added a1500 s.f. entrance atrium). A portion of the existing R& D space has been reserved for future conversion to medical office use. PROCEDURAL HISTORY In April 2002 the Cape Cod Commission,through the Chief Regulatory Officer,determined that the conversion from R&D and general office use to medical office use constitutes a change of use subject to review by the Commission as a DRI under Section 3(e) of the DRI Enabling Regulations as a "use change greater than 10,000 s.f." The applicant filed a DRI hardship exemption application with the Commission on September 19,2002,and it was deemed complete on November 21,2002. Duly noticed public hearings were conducted by the Commission pursuant to Section 5 of the Act on December 17,2002 and January 23,2003. At the December 17,2002 hearing,the subcommittee voted unanimously to recommend granting a hardship exemption with conditions. A subcommittee meeting was held on January 17, 2003 to review the draft decision. The full Commission voted 12 in favor, 1 abstaining to approve the hardship exemption with conditions on January 23,2003. Materials submitted for the record From the applicant: Date received: • • Conceptual floor plan,copy of site plan review application 4/26/02 Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 2 , 16, F BA'-_/v CAPE COD COMMISSION lt 1)1 " 3225 MAIN STREET ct`e Q� g ia. -' P.O. BOX 226 �� kt L) �� BARNSTABLE,MA 02630 ssACHUsti� (508)362-3828 FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org TO: Town of Barnstable Town Clerk, Building Inspector, Conservation Commission, Planning Board, Board of Appeals, Board of Health, DRI Liaison and Chief of Police: cl'FROM: Kathie Peters, Clerk of the Commission 1. 7 SUBJECT: Independence Medical Arts , Development of Regional Impact Hardship Exemption Decision DATE: February 21, 2003 Enclosed please find a copy of the Independence Medical Arts Decision that was decided by the Cape Cod Commission on January 23, 2003. Also, please note that although local boards may attach conditions that are more restrictive than the Commission's approval, a local approval may not be less restrictive. It is suggested that local boards reference the Commission's decision and, where applicable, attach conditions in their own approvals. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. to • Hardship Exemption application,DRI application,and supporting materials. 9/19/02 • 2 memoranda from Vanasse Associates re: traffic impacts 10/9/02 • Change of Use application 11/7/02 • List of hazardous materials • 11/12/02 • Cover memo,MSDS sheets,21E survey forms,hazardous waste manifests and Board of Health inventory sheet 11/15/02 • Sentinel floor plan 12/15/02 • Conceptual plans of entrance improvements,pavement removal, on-site deed restrictions 1/9/03 • Copy of plan showing Independence Drive layout 1/17/03 From the Commission: Date submitted • Letter to Michael Ford re: DRI notification 4/30/02 • Letter to Michael Ford re: clarification of DRI notification 5/15/02 • Letter to Tom Perry re: occupancy permit 7/2/02 • Letter to Michael Ford re: incomplete application 10/1/02 • Letter to Michael Ford re: complete application 11/26/02 • Subcommittee notice 11/26/02 • Subcommittee memo re: public hearing 12/11/02 ▪ Staff report 12/11/02 The application and notices of public hearings relative thereto,the Commission staff notes, exhibits and correspondence,the transcript and minutes of meetings and hearings and all written submissions received in the course of our proceedings are incorporated into the record by reference. TESTIMONY A public hearing was held on at the 1st District Courthouse,Assembly of Delegates chambers, in Barnstable Village on December 17,2002. Attorney Michael Ford,representing Independence Medical Arts,described the history and local permitting process for the project. He said that no town officials thought the project was a DRI requiring Commission review. Mr. Ford asked for a hardship waiver from natural resources/open space requirements since the incursions into the wetland buffer are a result of town officials' review. He closed his comments by stating that the hardship exemption should be granted based Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 3 on the applicant's complying in good faith with the local permitting process. He added that as a redevelopment project,the project is consistent with the land use goals of the RPP. Martha Hevenor introduced the staff report and presented natural resource and wetlands issues, explaining staff's concern that the access drive and a portion of the new parking lot encroach upon the 100 foot wetland buffer area which is not allowed by the RPP. She also noted that hazardous materials associated with the medical office are reduced from Sentinel's use of the site. Tim Boesch presented a summary of transportation concerns. He noted trip generation and safety issues associated with the site access drive and with Independence Drive. Ms. Hevenor and Mr. Boesch both said that staff agrees the applicant has a hardship but that relief from the standards should be waived only for the portion of the building that has been converted and permitted. Susan Kadar asked what is the distance between the entrance to Southwind and the site access drive. Mr. Boesch said it was about 200+feet. Mr. Randolph noted that there are several projects proposed in the same area of Independence Medical Arts and asked how they relate to each other in terms of traffic. Mr. Boesch explained that under the Fair Share requirements,each project must contribute a portion towards mitigation based on its impact. The subcommittee noted the design problems with Independence Drive but did not feel that the Commission could change it.They agreed that cars exiting the medical arts building should be forced to turn right onto Independence Drive. The subcommittee members then questioned the staff about their recommendations regarding the 9200 s.f. portion that has not yet been converted and explained that the building should be looked at as one project. Mr. Broidrick suggested that to address open space issues,the undeveloped portions of the site be permanently protected. Mr. Ford said that would be acceptable. He added that he would recommend to this client that a turning island be constructed at the entrance to prevent left turns out and that he would see if the client would remove a portion of the asphalt parking within the wetland buffer at the rear of the building. Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 i • January 23,2003 Decision Page 4 JURISDICTION Independence Medical Arts qualifies as a Development of Regional Impact(DRI) under Section 3(e) of the DRI Enabling Regulations as "a change of use greater than 10,000 square feet." FINDINGS The Commission has considered the application of Independence Medical Arts LLC for the conversion of general office space and research and development space to medical office use within an existing industrial building,and based on consideration of such application and upon the information presented at the public hearing and submitted for the record,makes the following findings pursuant to Section 23 of the Act: General G1. The Independence Medical Arts project consists of the conversion of approximately 26,000 square feet of general office use and research and development (R&D) use to medical office use within an existing industrial building that formerly housed Sentinel Packaging.The conversion has been completed and the building is open for business. The applicant plans to convert an additional 9,200 s.f of former R&D space to medical office use in the future. Local permits have not been issued for the future conversion. G2. The goals and standards of the RPP encourage reuse and redevelopment. G3. The project is located within a certified growth/activity center(industrial activity center) under the Barnstable Local Comprehensive Plan. G4.The Town of Barnstable officials did not recognize that the project triggered Commission DRI review and issued a building permit for the project in November 2001.The applicant also received an Order of Conditions from the Barnstable Conservation Commission in June 2001 and Site Plan approval in July 2001. A Certificate of Occupancy was issued in July 2002. G5. The Cape Cod Commission,through the Chief Regulatory Officer,found jurisdiction of the project in April 2002 as a change of use exceeding 10,000 s.f. floor area. The conversion was substantially complete at this time. Following discussions with the applicant's attorney and a review of documents submitted for local permitting requirements,Commission staff identified Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 it January 23,2003 Decision Page 5 issue areas where the change of use may result in increased impacts to the resources protected by the Act and evaluated the project's compliance with the Regional Policy Plan in the following areas: transportation,natural resources/open space, and hazardous materials. G6.The applicant would suffer great hardship if required to revise the project to meet the minimum performance standards of the RPP,both in terms of having to undo work which was completed and having to expend additional funds which were not budgeted for completion of the project. To support the applicant's claim of financial hardship,a financial statement documenting project costs was provided. Transportation Ti. The previous uses at 100 Independence Drive (prior to the Independence Medical Arts' ownership)"consisted of the following: • 21,672 square feet of Research and Development and • 24,446 square feet of General Office At the time of application: • 25,748 square feet of General Office and Research and Development had been converted to • • 25,748 square feet of Medical Office with an addition of 1,560 square feet of Medical Office (entrance atrium). For future conversion,the applicant proposes to: • convert 9,170 square feet of Research and Development to • 9,170 square feet of Medical Office. The final proposed configuration will consist of: • 36,478 square feet of Medical Office and • 11,200 square feet of General Office. T2. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Manual land use categories 710-General Office,720-Medical Office, and 760-Research and Development, the total project is estimated to generate: • 68 New Weekday Morning Peak Hour trips Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 6 • • 107 New Weekday Evening Peak Hour trips • 784 New Weekday Daily trips and • 110 New Saturday Peak Hour trips (if the facility is open on Saturdays.) T3. The conversion of the remaining 9,200 square feet from Research and Development to Medical Office is estimated to generate 22 new peak hour trips. A reduction of 10% of peak hour traffic is allowed under MPS 4.1.3.3 since the project is in a growth/activity center,reducing this impact to 20 peak hour trips. It is estimated 70% of the site traffic would use the Route 132 and Independence Drive intersection,or 14 trips. Based on this amount of traffic and the cost estimates to improve this intersection,the applicant's fair share at this location is $5,585. In order to meet the requirements of MPS 4.1.3.4 at this intersection,the applicant has agreed to pay the fair share estimate. T4. The project in its final configuration as proposed complies with the following MPS: 4.1.3.2' Acceptable site driveway operations 4.1.3.3 For meeting the minimum performance standards under Goal 4.1.3,a 10% reduction is allowed in Growth/Activity Centers and 25% in Growth Incentive Zones. T5. The project in its final configuration as proposed does not comply or compliance is unknown with the following MPS: Goal 4.1.1: SAFETY 4.1.1.1 General safety 4.1.1.2 Safety analysis and mitigation for locations Impacted by 25 or more new peak hour trips 4.1.1.3 Access management and restriction to lower volume street 4.1.1.5 Signage, utility poles and boxes, and lighting located to not cause visual obstruction, glare,or distractions 4.1.1.6 Site access/egress shall minimize impact on road system. Bicycle and pedestrian connections shall be included to connect to adjoining properties 4.1.1.7 Sight distances shall meet standards 4.1.1.8 Safety mitigation shall occur prior to occupancy 4.1.1.9 Driveway width shall not exceed MHD standards Goal 4.1.2: TRIP REDUCTION 4.1.2.1 Reduction/offset of 25% of increase in summer site traffic on daily and peak hour basis Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 7 • • 4.1.2.5 Bicycle,pedestrian,and other non-motorized accommodation in design where appropriate 4.1.2.6 Parking limited to requirements under local zoning or a parking analysis accepted by the Commission Goal 4.1.3: MAINTAINING OPERATIONS /PERFORMANCE 4.1.3.1 Regional Roadways are all roadways with a class higher than local as designated by the Cape Cod MPO 4.1.3.4 Analysis and mitigation required to maintain no-build conditions or provide fair share. (Project is in partial compliance with this standard.) 4.1.3.9 Preservation of existing transportation rights-of-way, provide frontage right-of-way for bicycles and pedestrians 4.1.3.12 Consistency with LCP, RTP,RIF,etc. T6. To partially address the Independence Drive site driveway safety issues,the applicant has agreed to install signage,pavement markings,and a traffic island at the driveway entrance to encourage the right-turn-in /right-turn-out operation of the driveway. T7. The Commission has determined that a hardship exists for this project.In accordance with Section 23 of the Act,the Commission waives the requirements of transportation MPS of the RPP where the project is non-compliant to alleviate the hardship. While the project does not comply with all the transportation standards, it does not result in substantial detriment to the public good or nullify or substantially derogate from the intent and purpose of the Act. Natural Resources and Open Space NR1.The 7.81 acre site is located within a mapped Significant Natural Resources Area (SNRA) due to its location within a public wellhead protection district. Three wetlands are located on the site: a small unnamed pond in the northern portion,Fresh Hole Pond to the northeast,and a small kettlehole (vegetated wetland) in the front of the site near Independence Drive. According to the natural resources inventory conducted by ENSR,Inc.,no state listed rare species were found on the site. A small population of Plymouth Gentian,a state-listed "species of concern" was found along the margins of the shores of Fresh Hole Pond. NR2. MPS 2.3.1.4 requires the provision and/or maintenance of undisturbed buffer areas of at least 100 feet from the edge of wetlands. Existing conditions plans (pre-dating the building's Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 8 conversion by the applicant) show parking and cleared areas as well as a portion of the building within the 100 foot wetland buffer areas. While these encroachments into the buffer areas are associated with the previous use, Independence Medical Arts' expansion of the parking areas in front of the building as well as the creation of the new entrance drive resulted in additional encroachments into the buffer areas. NR3. MPS 2.3.1.4 requires stormwater discharges to be located at a minimum of 100 feet from wetlands and water bodies. The placement of leaching chambers near the site drive within 100 feet of the vegetated wetland and by the building lawn in the vicinity of Fresh Hole pond does not comply with this standard. NR4. The applicant has agreed to remove a portion of the pre-existing asphalt parking area in the rear of the site from within the 100 foot wetland buffer area. NR5.As a'redevelopment project within an SNRA,the proportion of open space required would be 1:2 (total development area to total open space) unless the proportion of existing development to open space is less than that,in which case the project would be required to maintain the existing proportion of development to open space on site (but not less than a 2:1 ratio), either as on-site open space or as an equivalent cash or off-site contribution.The project may not be in compliance with the open space requirement,but the additional on-site development asso ciated ociated with the conversion would not result in substantial detriment to the public good. NR6. The applicant has agreed to place a deed restriction on the undeveloped portions of the site to limit further loss of on-site open space. Hazardous Materials Hazl. According to maps produced by the Cape Cod Commission for the 2002 Regional Policy Plan,the project site is in a Wellhead Protection District/Zone II area and thereby must comply with MPS 4.3.1.3. In terms of hazardous materials attributable to the most recent tenant of the existing building,information submitted by the applicant's attorney indicates that Sentinel Products used hazardous materials a enal s inclu ding Azoxy Compound (a blowing agent used in making plastics), lubricating oil,triinsol (a lubricant),paint thinner,xylene,trichloroethane,heat transfer oil, hydraulic oil,compressor oil,ethylene glycol,and ZEP solvent(a combination of petroleum naphtha, methylene chloride and trichloroethylene). Hazardous waste generated included chromic acid waste and rinse, chloroethane sludge and used ZEP solvent. Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 9 Haz2. According to information submitted by the applicant's attorney,hazardous materials and wastes attributable to the medical office includes (on a daily basis) sharps (needles, lancets), materials contaminated with body fluids, bleach and trichloric acid. The sharps container will be 12x14x12 inches,and will be used to collect all items or materials that come in contact with human body fluids. Additionally,according to the applicant's attorney,the Medical Arts facility currently has an X-ray machine with digital film development capability. The facility may bring another X-ray machine on site,but it will also use digital technology. The medical office also uses medicines,including vaccines,steroids and pain killers, but these are exempt from the RPP's definition of Hazardous Materials. A limited amount of materials will be kept on site for facility cleaning, but this is also exempt from the RPP. Haz3. The information submitted by the applicant indicates that the hazardous materials and wastes attributable to the medical center in this case are significantly less than that used, handled, stored or generated by Sentinel Products. CONCLUSION Based on the findings above,the Cape Cod Commission hereby concludes: • The applicant demonstrated a substantial hardship as noted in Findings G4 through G6. Desirable relief may be granted to the applicant without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Act. The Cape Cod Commission hereby approves with conditions the Hardship Exemption application of Independence Medical Arts ,provided the following conditions are met: CONDITIONS General G1 The hardship exemption approved herein is for the Independence Medical Arts LLC project, which consists of the previously completed conversion of approximately 26,000 s.f. of former general office space and R&D space to medical office space. It also includes a future conversion Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 10 • of approximately 9,200 s.f. of former R&D space to medical office space. Any increase in the floor area proposed for future conversion shall be reviewed by the Commission. G2. The Hardship Exemption is valid for a period of seven years from the date of the written decision.All permits associated with this approval must be issued within 7 years. G3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the future conversion of additional building space,the applicant must obtain a preliminary Certificate of Compliance from the Commission stating that all conditions pertaining to issuance of a preliminary Certificate of Compliance have been met. G4.The applicant shall notify Commission staff of the intent to seek a preliminary Certificate of Compliance at least thirty (30) days prior to the submittal of a building permit application for any additional conversion of building space and 30 days prior to the anticipated date of occupancy. Such notification shall include a list of key contact(s)for questions that may arise during the Commission's compliance review Commission staff shall complete an inspection under this condition within seven (7) business days of such notification and inform the applicant in writing of any deficiencies and corrections needed. The applicant understands that the Commission has no obligation to issue a Certificate of Compliance unless all conditions are complied with or secured consistent with this decision. The applicant agrees to allow Cape Cod Commission staff to enter onto the property which is the subject of this decision for the purpose of determining whether the conditions contained in the decision are met. G5. Prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy from the Town of Barnstable,the applicant shall obtain a final Certificate of Compliance from the Commission. G6. The additional converted building space shall not be occupied until a final Certificate of Compliance is.received from the Cape Cod Commission. G7.This hardship exemption is granted based on the following plans dated 4/12/01, prepared by Sullivan Engineering,Osterville,MA.: • Proposed Grading and Site Improvements,70/100 Independence Drive • Overall Parking Plan,70/100 Independence Drive • Existing Conditions Plan,70/100 Independence Drive Any changes to the site plans shall be reviewed by the Commission. Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 11 Transportation T 1. Prior to the issua nce of a PreliminaryCertificate of Compliance,the p applicant shall make a one-time payment of $5,585 to Barnstable County/CCC for the purpose of studying,designing, operating,promoting,and/or building transportation improvements in the project's study area, or in the Town of Barnstable in general. T2. Prior to the issuance of a final Certificate of Compliance,the applicant shall construct a traffic island,directional signage,and pavement markings at the facility's site driveway on Independence Drive in accordance with the conceptual plan submitted on 1/9/03. Final plans shall be approved by Cape Cod Commission staff. • Natural Resources and Open Space NR1. Prior to the issuance of a final Certificate of Compliance,the applicant shall remove a portion of the asphalt parking area at the rear of the site and revegetate it as shown on conceptual plans submitted on 1/9/03. Final plans shall be approved by Cape Cod Commission staff.. NR2. Prior to the issuance of a final Certificate of Compliance applicant shall record deed restrictions on the existing open space on site, as shown on conceptual plans submitted 1/9/02. Final plans shall be approved by Cape Cod Commission staff. Hazardous Materials and Wastes Hazl. Independence Medical Arts shall not use,treat,generate or store on site,or dispose of on site or off site,hazardous wastes or hazardous materials in excess of 25 gallons (or the dry weight equivalent) any time. The Commission shall be notified in writing of any changes to the facility's use,treatment,generation,storage or disposal of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes that affects this condition in such a way as to be in excess of the 25 gallon (or dry weight equivalent) quantity limit. Any such changes to the facility's use,treatment,generation,storage or disposal of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes shall be reviewed subject to Section 7 of the Cape Cod Commission Administrative Regulations,Modifications to Approved DRIs,dated 5/30/02,and as amended from time to time. Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 12 The Cape Cod Commission hereby approves with conditions the Hardship Exemption application of Independence Medical Arts,LLC pursuant to Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act ,c. 716 of the Acts of 1989,as amended for the Independence Medical Arts project located in Hyannis, A. #110/03 Robert D. Deane,Chair Date Commonwealth of Massachusetts Barnstable,ss. Or)t is A-0 ay of '!?�. ,2003, before me personally appeared kom _ %L i ,to ( known to be the person described in anid who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that i�( � executed the same as /L14 J free act and • deed. • .e./ otary Public Commonwealth of Massachusetts �1�.111ti111�- My Commission expires: r °FF"�'SE"� P l ' KATNANOTARYPI L.DETERS ` BARNSTABLE COUNTY TI My COMM.E Yes Nrn.19,2004 Independence Medical Arts#HDEX/CU02028 January 23,2003 Decision Page 13 • • - 3 3. �`'� ,-...aa:o a - 'wry ~,`—2 -- ,<.• s "$�$� d t` `""D T-•�. I � : - •ice' a�9• 1 cz_nz • Red ya .'. , �� ^--_..,:; g. g. -_ -r , : s a_ ,, tom_ -- a `' �� a d 3�i9'�9C' I 'ICI /i - - -.I —— , -__-V - I� - I A��'�i 'li'i, --- y a i Ifi rs 1 s-a.1::' / • a,... 1 ' 1-r a' L - I r, r rrl i . -_7 • a a a a a9a d ar .`� - ''-- —__J -- • ``_ ' ` -�.et�I; `t:!-•• ! //;'r;;�;;;/li �: - a - _ y r • -1 C '. i ; I23 - I In/r 1.7 -iz-- - / 1 y - -_ - 1 `\`. . „j- %,T▪- �:, r ;!' ;-- -','; ;';e _ 2 i i I ' I! III,, T:i - I ,,, k ��` �\ , -;-i• '' i'f /ii% "\`,`` _ rlr •.-1 • I x it ;S j s a °1 / I- x _. I1 ,I I h •� I %,1 �, i� `,,,,\ j': _ _ �.I"aY'•o� a '� 9 !�' <. 1 ^ I/I I 'l'I�:� 1! w'�-j:._ I I!)-I y ' \ , 1 - {r , 1 \�1 '- 'r s j.u - 1 I I /I r r Bali-•-'"�—`�_ , ` `-:`4 'T-a 1 , • i . , il a l ,E�. 1 t:"�. ' • ; -�.�L ` r i_ .I !� �i r�.11)' 'I:- o� I 33T c to _ • •1 i = I.� hf r _;' = •T ,.4i• ui ' r 'I '/ 4 _ ' i_ '�--. -s t - r is t �' _�1 • VV-.� I - J . _,� _ 3 I I �1 Ir ' --r- v b t_ ea .s.f s ! e� #' 1111 It ?'4 az :3 • :( ? ,,,/,'•-4, 1 _:— i - T c.-,. _- is ,.�P ;c•c _ --------_- !-'? 1 'llll rlllI ,,' / • `A`,n V\` ,d < _ -•F pp -•-2 - �Ga SOS' So le !B LJ /••a y11: 'lll tll 11 11// 11>P`)111'` d•pt, };a3 XXI a €II• _;ems_ (�L�'� ~ liiiili• iij �i\I` ; ai+k9�e •f9g y� v E. \\ -`�7 • Ill lliililyrl�q.i i;�"� lI jtile¢¢5n i1n �pv v ^ u �Y! 7 - Tr-6 'J' --1�- �G rillt. /1 I I1, ,14;,. ° ' , :soil.- . •%.A o �. _ p 1 "'} \ t r �f y ye a a'+ �!I n//1 h/ 4 42 ' o i 1— 1,I-t 11� a -}1''I iill l hl I1f. o , +, 9 il 3.'1 3 t ill Irl ®� 17_ 1;1„�' _'r 11ln 111 I - 17 iF': 2 p g y / NIL I ru Ili: n T! m �• 1- yz a, _ >_ / I g j pi mi. I}— • v P !e a 1_2. , 1 `= 1 , i? - _ &a i �s: yi�rl - it ��{' ',ja' t a vi O\ - 7 - \ \ arc''^ m 4 I. j is O \4 i +� \ \, 2 ! \ I!oi —I YS 5 3 ill ; ¢ ill 2 3i 1 sa �? g 8 di 'i , I' ` TOWN OF BARNSTABLE t SIGN PERMIT PARCEL ID 295 009 ' GEOBASE . ID 20849 ADDRESS 255 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE' PHONE BARNSTABLE ZIP - LOT 3-A BLOCK LOT SIZE DBA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BA . PERMIT 88679 DESCRIPTION 22.5 SQ. FT. FREESTANDING SIGN PERMIT TYPE BSIGN TITLE SIGN PERMIT CONTRACTORS: PROPERTY OWNER r,< Department Of ARCHITECTS: Regulatory Services ` TOTAL FEES: . $25.00 BOND $.00 • t11E CONSTRUCTION COSTS $.00 fet-, b fr-Cli- S''. % _753 MISC. NOT CODED ELSEWHERE 1 PRIVATE 0, O'_"' . * BARNSTABLE, * HtAss. N:157 BUILDING D�V SION BY V''v.�..(1 DATE • ISSUED 11/29/2005 EXPIRATION DATE " Town of Barnstable CARNSTA81/. Regulatory Services ''t1% Thomas F.Geller,Director BuildingDivisiont Tom Perry, Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 Permit# fr--(‘' 7 / Application for Sign Permit Applicant: -44 E LE IV C. $ l-'DU I I U-) Assessors No. 0?S Doing Business As: 154L'O 49 t tiJ `0 5S 1 6 Li Telephone No. c b S'• 3 FS 5• 5-00 6 Sign Location _ Street/Road: 2 y 5 I O fj'E l i 01.J G S '0 i;,l 1-1-;'A, N iv I Zoning District: Old Kings Highway? Yes) Hyannis Historic District? Yes) Property Owner Go iv TACT" : AAR-0 'DO LitiST EI t) Name: 'E't 5&-V EIZ,Q NGE L LC- Telephone: J O& . T?5 • 93/ 6 Address: q t? IJO R T S-r: Village: 4 YA-IU it)t S Sign Contractor Name: ,A:0 Nr i&ICJ G aro S 16 an Ill C¢ G 1,C_ Telephone: Sp K. 5 3'i. 7o a 0 Mailing Address: 1-1 I!kJ US 1 tikL <341 K V i✓1 tJ C WI. A- 0 2L 3 Description Please draw a diagram of lot showing location of buildings and existing signs with dimensions,location and size of the new sign. This should be drawn on the reverse side of this application. Is the sign to be electrified? Yes (Note:If yes, a wiring permit is required) Width of building face ft.x 10= x.10= I hereby certify that I am the owner or that I have the authority of the owner to make this application, that the information is correct and that the use and construction shall conform to the provisions of§240-59 through§240-89 of the Town of Barnstable Zoning Ordinance. �n Signature of Owner/Authorized Agent: Citil 9 1a' L- Date:_ li If S-/(15 Size: 021• S 5. • Permit Fee: S, QO Sign Permit was approved: Disapproved: ® . Signature of Building Official: POLiti Date: it — �/ —6 Q:I WPFILES4SIGNSV SIGNAPP.DOC 5' 2" I Project Visiting Nurse Association 4'-6" of Cape Cod 1/2"reveal 255 Independence Drive 4 2 I q 111 Hyannis,Massachusetts II Sign D3 eq Painted aluminum post and panel sign 4 1/2" .��_■�� Double sided 1-0 1 1/2" Header 21/2" CAPE COD HEALTHCARE eq„ Background color Match Benj.Moore 2066-10 Blue 6 1/2" Text White Material VDC 5 \/i si• + ' NJ iirs^C Typefce` Panels 3'-3" Background color Match ICI 1331 Balustrade 7 1/2" Blue /\ssociationText color White Material VDC O T t Cape (OdTypeface Frutiger Roman caps&Ic Panel to be removable for changes Posts Color Match ICI 2004 Egret 1" eq" 10" 3" 255 Independence Drive eq" 2'-9" Baldwin Design 86 Earthbound Cartway Brewster Massachusetts 02631 t 508.385.5006 f 508.385.5886 e baldwin@gis.net Drawing Scale:3/4" = 1'-0" p ' ?.rf: 4. :'9,w tZ 74.. ',yt , } ,-.M%. iiVs, on µ w r' v-n" ,x,. "• `>,.,�"I':..- ) °' :"Y;i '' ,ir .. '': 4.4.'".; 1.5 sib:, >,r„ /5 z" .4v;Ste;°'3'"` �,�,,:�•.�,., >. r �,�� '�6.,..:��.y;..,,,✓ ��h,�'` ak'. x ..w. ;�r.< shy q ,.. its., --;.' ' +,: '":' .. `•., a;., :".6 ?,,:a , �.M a� fit; ;i • ,. " ..F;; �i''r:s•.-' <�'. a • Y¢r3M'.rom....' ,%€:".;�, :"g.»'-�",, :. df. � *'. "`c'' �l ° • .S. 4.e . ^s,.;;,iq=. 0._r Ms ;.: �; -'''''''''I''.:,. „>I , ° 1.7..,: , . , .4.•,,,::0 f,: <�� zi" x. ''��'� �� za ;a"'ti4�5p F' "� <r(i:y , s , v> �,;x> ; m .u; :r : : . °y�;Y.;.' 5,. � ,�,w. ;� � � 'ix.''.y i �� �.' '% � '• x ft. ' '''.'''''''..41-34-400Vvik.www,„14:mvw,50,A. -,.. VNA .4,,,,,,,, ., a II :u;'' .:� �' ,,:::...fit. ,.,:,<.. .�..' :^r.,:;4;y::�' .<� .,,. „, r,!•• ....:1,; —.1 A , .2.,A �''c. .,_�` L'x�� �,�.t1 J. .� ,... ..„ ' h. :,sue .,, • .s..,a""55 4(...,.;-4 •• s:�;N,.,• pq ,;:.Y'1c.' w'..= •',.,, ,u , Hs :... ,-,:.kr*- may, z. :w" r.. �.//F'" .,.... :<<>Sw'.N"..7 /r`�/ "ArY'%� f.4. /"..A y' � �� "nv'<��t: I �,i't' :.�x�wr ' r/..:�• , ,/•:sue' •� .:� .ter,� ;�Y .a � '" `� < emu. �;� fit.: ... , a. w. r.. .,,: ..,.,;; .,;,"<� �.,," r�'" '-�- N%0,'•" ;-fit:: ..R.>:>✓ :�� " i .....;;,,.,:...�``�.:,�, �: .r<.<....�'.. y . , ;s. .s,.ram.'�'....:`"��,":� "„'�"4 5, � <�«F.,x.:r,>�:,:P"„�,�^,'�`;�'�n:, ,,,r:,;*,'', .;t r„/../i z•.,'Y,,„42.,ks' ." r'. . . <' d L ,. a'':%; �' '; "ba .< f.,. ••,.., i. xl,;;' '...,•,,,. ,arsf. ......> :3. ..a• ,. '': `.r 'F y . :':$.s.': <.�r"�'."•.'� :s. x`k:< ' :>r srr"7i s,;:v r...�� '.h:.•:�, ,/ .. ..,,. 7:r 'i.et. ' °t`�.GV2.T.�d'�•s"e�M;'-. � r�Y „.' ::��ar s.,;�"..��M,.<:::33 � �� „�:,��,<,vt, ,w: :' s, it~ ,t r.1•" " t i. r w ,, : 'u n: iss 4t; n. 4 � " 2, l " �': p <9r"..� C ,fi� „Y ' » rr: < ' . a ^F. .a „' ' Mn': . : t vt ., 1.. i ... . ./ " � ..wx:' a . � .a,r , . , , TOWN OF BARNSTABLE SIGN PERMIT PARCEL ID 295 009 GEOBASE ID 20849 ADDRESS 255 INDEPENDENCE DRIVE PHONE BARNSTABLE ZIP - LOT 3-A BLOCK LOT SIZE DBA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BA PERMIT 88678 DESCRIPTION 7.5 SQ. FT. FREESTANDING SIGN PERMIT TYPE BSIGN TITLE SIGN PERMIT CONTRACTORS: PROPERTY OWNER Department of ARCHITECTS: Regulatory Services I. TOTAL FEES: $25.00 BOND $.00 �t E CONSTRUCTION COSTS $.00 ; ` ( 753 MISC. NOT CODED ELSEWHERE 1 PRIVATE P'I0_1 * BARNSTABLE, * MASSi63¢ � . �► .7 DMA'SA BUILWNG DIVISION BY rr� __._ DATE ISSUED 11/29/2005 EXPIRATION DATE s Town of Barnstable T Regulatory Services 't j` ! Thomas F.Geller.Director i `N& f Building Division <- `s� • Tom Perry, Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 www.town.bernstable.ma.us , Office: 508-862-4038 • Fax: 508-790-6230 Permit 477 a Application for Sign Permit Applicant: 44(t_.-. 0 G . 4 L 0 U) I k.) Assessors No. per)5 S de) J Doing Business As: b A L U U 16 T)EIS 16?1 Telephone No. 5 a$.3$.5 . 60 6 Sign Location street/Road: h:5 ) lU 0-p -E--11 0 6 J( t✓ V) R_11 L t A V iI 1J $J t 5 Zoning District: Old Kings Highway? Yes)Hyannis Historic District? Yesf J Property Owner C ..f'r 4C Name: 9' S—4E2 4 UGt it-1-C AA 12,o1.l eo 0,15T 4Telephone: con'•r) '? S • 93 /6 Address:, 7 0 6(-T Si Village: hi `t'r4 ill iU 1 5 Sign Contractor Name: il O f u C e-10 S I A 1J I N 6 G L C Telephone: J a$'. 5 3'-1•S o 0 0 Mailing Address: 'i 11J 4l1STIZ.I A L C3AR.k k..oMla, r(1_..)3) --`t' t I/&A- o Za.a 3 Description Please draw a diagram of lot showing location of buildings and existing signs with dimensions,location and size of the new sign. This should be drawn on the reverse side of this application. Is the sign to be electrified? Yes N�o (Note:if yes, a wiring permit is required) Width of building face ft. z 10= z.10 I hereby certify that I am the owner or that I have the authority of the owner to make this application, that the information is correct and that the use and construction shall conform to the provisions of§240-59 through§240-89 '` of the Town of Barnstable Zoning Ordinance. D ++ Signature of Owner/Authorized Agent: L Q Q�� /1 Date: ) I 11510r Size: 7. 5 5 t" Permit Fee: $07 . 66 Sign Permit was approved: Disapproved: Signature of Building Official: il Date: (t— ? —O S Q.1 WPF ILEStSIGNSiSIGNAPP.DOC Project Visiting Nurse Association of Cape Cod 255 Independence Drive Hyannis,Massachusetts Sign D2 Secondary Directional Painted aluminum post and panel sign Double sided 3'-8" Panel Background color Match ICI 1331 Balustrade 4"„lit3' 4" Blue 1/2"reveal Text color White Material VDC 1" 1" Typeface Frutiger Roman caps&lc 3 1/2" 5' Panel to be removable for changes 5" Visiting Nurse 23/4" Posts • 4 1/2" Color Match ICI 2004 Egret Association of 2'-6" Cape Cod 5'-0" Baldwin Design 86 Earthbound Cartway Brewster Massachusetts 02631 t 508.385.5006 508.385.5886 e baldwin@gis.net Drawing Scale:3/4" = 1'-0" 1 • s` ';. '., c ff 11;,•< ems','. • .. • 1, "^ ;,•,..3zR tic q a " 3 , / l zf .i• , ,•b,"- b•.r<-„x#sk•:G: `.,:l•:.ok,A?,;.'•, xxxx,:, 0.4 r,r;. .; ', ;, • y S.s� '.'� ':�c ..• �r .. ,r ..� �`:k,X�� ,�.s?�\``x4w:a•�%t•';n".'< .:�,'�" ".3•: j - S •/,5 .- «.• � z ,yw � aS;2v.::s.�::,,.;'a,.�z;R M%qr..•�...i "�.ii' �sF.%'�:, xn yi fli;'S: ::3r.,,.�...,,�. 55. ,. ,r• N,. .,r �(j� 5 . .m ., .:R £. 5p/-.:. /yq°,x., .z., • F 'PI. .ITISY ..�:`tr�:;5',':` r,A,s z. , �;s',, �.a,:- 1'{�.F�'S�irl�(t( , '<a�'3�'r ro5 w b "::x�;; if sib:/. »..5 �, �`'p rs. E• ,a �4 F�.:a7 Gi6r �i:' 4.,, E;F+fr;�•� Cox:." �.Y.M i>Y./:..:u �5', 5 ga.:,�'5wr�',;.«.,--;..• rs: / .:: '� ry'aH:S ,,.Sa3i <� , Ca} T "x,r� rid /. xU.,''.r"rnYil.R�w�'ye% ,.-- /ems,�,..S,..Y; b.�. '•5 ::;: ; ;� fit' �z ��. °�::::. ., s < �..«<w".�g,�ggg�$ ,,,,,;Y• . r% ,%,,,. ,., ,. 5: ra..,.,,i, .y:.... r .. t c "„ -ci.,'xYf ::_a,',.; -r»rr �t , , 3 •.. r .s Y .:': 5„",- ic, .,.:.."aks„ ,-" ' :max`, „ • b»,;,,,.;.:.,/ ,.1/ i t;/-•-.5;-5;x. - <" -^r � ':� .. �. ,: ,•'.•- aym^�"";ate-` � i; rr..r '; r,� 5•,,,5 r n.•,,5•�ic,'- <5s-...--- .,x<cr^ Y �.,^ '"�$ ,:ate,.- .:, :.Aii .". :..... .5, ,,, ,i-;<,<,.. .. .,,.�-it�� r .. 5 ..,Ru'�r ��,,p�. .. _r ' /.'<:_.�w'�"nxfi":s5¢5m'S:S s;,,3/y ,e'Y' .. ,F:�`a. .,,z ., o..�::�'!'���5 rr d rffiF- /•....f..:,... S.... ;� ,`,..: ,. ..,,�.,.;...,->,,..-✓P.u.9...,?.a'.,..-"�" „"/.,.,,r,», : " r6.r,^.'.Y/.bz / ,..„--.�..e`'F6. d'. a bw.�"- . .'•.,.... ,r:.x..`,.i;y,',_�•:" -- ....T....=... .^s.F3:^'A 's%:;,,rer ef. .; .':•; ,,x . „ ... <' ,.,,,,,,or. f l f ` . , :. 5r.5 • ..: - � >F' Hl ",4> `:,.•ca'.,�+C `t 'c�9. vw - . ic ^.;a ,� . / kr ..nnr. . ` :...•5. ..,Sa. .. . .. - �. . n.,„x• ••.`; « 1n` �: x'mxi'� , r:✓ r;' .. tr b/ ."" "., �, .". .Rb . w ,..Nr ! �„ . ....... o t xt. . _, : .:','• '; ' �. '`i"% "- sl �Y. . „.,",. ,. . ....... " � ,.n,.,,, ,..:br. x....... x.I .... ..11lR3 ,.... ,..,nd..: , „- ,. , 5` ,s.:,:'"„F <i..;b. 3„R >5>' '� ; .. ..<. /...�.. ;„/.. ...,.rfn6 fax:.",:.:.... .:3a.»n/ «.�a,X N /.. /%�� .a,xny u ..., ,x-.,..,..;. .. ... F! . `Y<ei<:. .:,. ;:Z . ,isy.j. ,1:i'11 .! fi,r.,N .,. -.x m :�,, _ ,"x. t;^ " x H ) w y � « rk. . ,w x< :: .u�»:�..R.a�rVy0-� i �x �.,1".w %nA;.nrF ;N' /Tn . :'� 6//sP . :"` �: . ..Yr • T,L " " l^ . . -br • ." 5 r »�..,, .--5. .�...x.F-_ caT:,<'s:�z':�' �,a " ^�. .r :1 NY . v, �w x,,.;�; 7��- T5�^. �,y;.a"� ra ,;:b - .." ,.,. .. G on m� r. . �/ _�� / / . . . , .. . .. ! �y;': �`< M `�`w�" . :: ;nd, .W,.., �Y,�, A_.r�� °Wr.- - wy� .. .? n, . . :4.�j, �5Vl-»�_:re : M�"!:;::. =' s% s=vz r :`. '.: : � : I gi,.;/ r•/,y,/n?iS.mc,, ---,. .. if ... rr ;y. ',,,- - . �c, "." /�.. ......;,y., . : i» r��::;n>«m' . 55. r 1 ,d %.;: s- .:•5d� Ri.�% �l 9Y"4:: � �li�/. �,. „:.b;/ s '.r , Y,*.: '. ..v".%'. , .,..��xc-,' ;',h z . < ;:� "� i.'", F' ",e.; `� . 7� i i? /.., , ^,„//3, 1 ,r,Re"��r. ,. r /?/ m6 , .::;, .-%a# , < : ` � s ..�r' .,n°7; ""r;',* c`•;:. ��: .� ..�l�� ;NAM- _�; 50�„ ..:..��r7n:y° 7m r�LG � . 3 :NN 1' 9' � ayd .,.g : � ' ;.. z ./1/.` r. /,5p : r r/�.t".: � 'rF ,..,d�•P ,. "rf�: :. Y. ' < � 4��!m_ .. 3' im 'yY �, k.;Y.b fo. , .p ::lV« . ^ WAit, GS 'fi% .,1, � . ai ^ u" 3�`G< yl0y,t'- < a ' ," /�. i 1 :-r tt ,n ' b" b« � � ' F. a" 3, :. , G .s r.r� «. r r { y x< :.;r, � »Pwr " ,a.', " « aw .^4� .. � � . a .', , AW: i!k tr¢ P zn5o»". n Y " �g y:V :4H•sb5 s� , r ., .'sr�.�o %:.`5 „ s •-„/./ P , /y/6. u Ryxt'lai'/ x` '5 .% r' f�nQ ' ' � ' ���5, - � � :. < ,. . « '' ,�..,�u,. ': s,Sx' F .fi3r.•�., 2 i,r�. r < qd! di0.... ,v, '<;,.,; sr.%4 r': ./< 1 MY:'.°F;i? dri�. ; � ' .. ^., �' ja%�; ' �.� : ,:, a ��.I�was „ >.v ,�.� /< g 4 .�� " -b.,: ..;yy , , 'r " ' rcam' z .�''1. q �� ` d��W.."i �ite:,".4 . "I 44.4-' 'a",:,;.�: rki ,'y" sj!°5:; ? c• ;; /em :y , / x ,w V�, .P�� rk .d.; , c~ .�x� � „ i . 3�k.c t^' 5:we "a �: ' »." ;,�" ";-s>,', '.;'x.' ': :.;y„ ;.5. oy,,�.fia+ ,,,W^y: Ri�•A �M < ' s i , , ".s'< t R w :; ,<', . �7�"r?'A,r a � Nry , ' a •. . P hc,:.3�3"" H';'z+�a/����^ <`, y" . , ". r : K �d :r iSts<x 4�� u � ^p''" „ `"; ^ .,..r,. ,,r. s /' r:.✓ ry �/ .S�. ' Y� : ,ge' e .3.� k ter '.:.s s' <t a s y.; ..; r. "z 4,, �` ,.,,N�'.fir „ x •,<.., ." „5 > r i * a✓E . > � � - t �d£ =a •• "' � :° w x KY,a, +.e',ri,;, b^,;;' : ....,,u,;p•c:R . r .�4 ,r ; s% �.�'r•�'�•,. d;Y.,. ✓" m"' rirg' ;<,'. = �k:5 Y; . ° a€5:- „ y�' .: .1":;,w:'"°2'-'4 s'� qs-?::". ? ... .. ,« w :. ". ,� �<..:s:w ^.,, .::a:�' ;. .w•.`�'.:-P" � ,.t: <, .,�.� -:3 �r ,"`�-''^�a.. ... t o .. , �q , 10 7/..)--10 6,e-mt/ (Jai r ik 6 /hew. Likw 7— I fill 4les 141 vUnleC (1-)a-7 - jaw", teX,e7 /91-4)?W 0/r/3- /SSA es , Project Visiting Nurse Association of Cape Cod Hyannis,Massachusetts Sign Sign Types D3&D2 Painted aluminum post and panel double sided signs •rain CAPE COD HEALTHCARE 4 VisitingN u rse Association of Cape Cod Visiting Nurse •i . Association of w. ,o ® Cape Cod 255 Independence Drive .w i \\IN\ co cP £9 c•=. co ° . fuiravp.: L' ' ors f.,...........„______ „,, I Baldwin Design 86 Earthbound Cartway 4 Brewster Massachusetts 02631 t 508.385.5006 f 508.385.5886 e baldwin@gis.net Drawing Scale:3/4" = 1'-0° , r