Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0010 KENT ROAD
IMF . R t k Lot 12 N/F p^, S83 49'17 E eookbert E. Alberts tl 220.20• 2900 Page 146 15.5' (220.62' record) O ✓ 1V �n Lot 13 27,378±SF ;-'Original Dwelling:::: O =� d VN ,00' ,i DwFa w>=4 gal -p O — ew Concrete_:• �g 3 2 :Foundation 42.7' ' 1 i �7^ 1116 uOj 34.8' W7 f� Wetland Flags 1 Placed by ENS? ) / / 37.9' / / 0 WF9 REFERENCES: 9/DH Fnd 61•�tK Assessors Map: 280 Parcel: 43 !1 Plan Book 90/79 3�• ZONE:RF-1 0 00. Setbacks: Fron t: 30' p Side: 15' / �"Z Rear: 15' �ZH OF I certify that the foundation RiCrN*D y� shown hereon conforms to the PLOT PLAN R �LHEUREUX H. setback requirements of the"12 Zoning Bylaws of the town IN Barnstable. BARNSTABLE e0e� m IN Professional Land Surveyor Date MASS. NOTES: DATE: 26IFEB103 SCALE: 1"--40' 1.) The foundation shown was located on the ground 0 10 20 30 40 60 80 FEET by conventional survey methods. on 251FEB103. PREPARED FOR: 2.) The property information shown hereon was Harriet Buono compiled from available record information and 13 Deerhill Drive does not represent on actual on the ground survey. Ho-Ho-KuS NJ 07423 3.) This plan is not for recording and is not PREPARED BY:to be used for construction layout or deed CapeSury description purposes. 7 Porke r Road Osterville MA 02655 DWG #: C483pp1 FIELD BY. MDH/WHK (508) 420-3994 / 420-3995fax i TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION M4ap. -�' Parcel 0 Permit# 30 Health DivisionN-71.23102- ±�`�6 ) ®Z Date Issued 8' Conservation Divisi P 7/9 S Application c Tax Collector - m Permit Feed- Treasurer � �310 I Gf� ril�nl�1 viU6i UUCNi,v A SEWER Planning Dept. , V CONNECTION PERMIT FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION PRIOR TO Date Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board CONSTRUCTION. Historic-OKR— (R_9 Preservation/Hyannis Project Street Address a Village Owner &P.Zi si �K o,v o Address Telephone 6Z6 3e p-5/yip Permit Request Van / Square feet: 1 st floor: existing %000 proposed&.00 2nd floor: existing 9 proposed 13(s0 Total new_I000 Zoning District Flood Plain Groundwater Overlay Project Valuation '/,5-0,000 Construction Type 000d Lot Size Grandfathered:,)2(Yes ❑ No If yes, attach supporting documentation. Dwelling Type: Single Family Two Family ❑ Multi-Family(#units) ,- Age of Existing Structure ��1'S�U vfZ5. Historic House: ❑Yes /FNo On Old King's Highway: 'Iles ❑No Basement Type: /PFull ❑Crawl ❑Walkout ❑Other Basement Finished Area(sq.ft.) _ Basement Unfinished Area(sq.ft) ,L ) Number of Baths: Full: existing new—C2c—_ Half: existing new Number of Bedrooms: existing_ new TT Total Room Count(not including baths):existing new !02 First Floor Room Count Heat Type and Fuel: ❑Gas x0il ❑Electric ❑Other Central Air: Yes ❑No Fireplaces: Existing New Existing wood/coal stove: ❑Yes �Ko Detached garage:❑existing ❑new size Pool: ❑existing ❑new size Barn:❑existing ❑new size Attached garage: existing ❑new size Shed:Elexisting ❑new size Other: Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization ❑ Appeal# Recorded❑ Commercial ❑Yes ❑No If yes,site plan review# Current Use Proposed Use �� )) T- BUILDER INFORMATION Name �JT`zUf✓1 J • 5�(-),ScCUc. 1 4c_ Tele hone Number p ���� Address S! License# C �1 7 e9 a- 11)5-FIE(2,yi LL�E 1-kj, 6_'). 6 Ste_ Home Improvement Contractor# lG1`o/4l/ Worker's Compensation# J ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULT G FROM THIS'PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO SIGNATURE DATE _ �2 3� FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY �. PERMIT NO. DATE ISSUED p MAP/PARCEL NO. - ADDRESS ' VILLAGE - OWNER i DATE OF INSPECTION: - FOUNDATION - c FRAME INSULATION 0K Clfm, 7 / off �✓'+ ' .f, FIREPLACE oZ �k ✓� y A�I c ._ ELECTRICAL: ROUGH _-FINAL PLUMBING: ROUGH FINAL GAS: ROUGH FINAL FINAL BUILDING f iloor DATE CLOSED OUT ASSOCIATION PLAN NO. rr " TOWN OF BARNSTABLE � CERTI,FfCATE OF OCCUPANCY I PARCEL ID 280 035 GEOBASE ID 18882 ADDRESS 10 KENT ROAD PHONE BARNSTABLE t . ZIP — LOT 13 BLOCK LOT SIZE DBA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BA i i PERMIT 73466 DESCRIPTION CERT. OF OCCUPATION PERMIT #63094 i PERMIT TYPE BC00 TITLE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY i CONTRACTORS: BISHOPRIC, SJ INC Department of Regulatory Services TOTAL FEES: CONSTRUCTION COSTS $.00 , 756 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 1 PRIVATE d. .0 * BAMSI'ABLE, MASS. 1639. iOtF�MA'S A j BUILDING IV SIO BY DATE ISSUED 12/09/2003 EXPIRATION DATE THE FOLLOWING IS/ARE THE BEST IMAGES FROM POOR QUALITY ORIGINALS) MA U L DATA Department of Regulatory Services * BARNSTABLE, MASS. � i639. ♦� �FD MA'S A BUILDING DIVISION BY i Department of Regulatory Services • a s BAMSfABLE. MASS. 039. 1 BUILDING DIVISION BY THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET, ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF, EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY. EN- CROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE.MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION.STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF FOUR CALL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND 1.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS THIS CARD KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION WHERE APPLICABLE. SEPARATE 2. PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS HAS BEEN MADE WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCU- PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR (READY TO LATH). PANCY IS REQUIRED. SUCH BUILDING SHALL NOT BE ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND MECH- 3.INSULATION. OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. ANICAL INSTALLATIONS. 4.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY VISIBLEPOST THIS CARD SO IT IS BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION AP ROVALS C1 17/�3 Qk ' Q 4h �� . ' /�?d-110 23F�� O� T 19 3 2r-'�hnt �l6 2/�`dc� 0- , A �tr 3 1 HEATING INSPECTION APPROVALS EERING DEPARTMENT rI V ZG1 c 12�Q� 3 �WXA' 2 1 r r� WVA&BOARPOF HEALTH OTH SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CON- INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS THE INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE STRUCTION WORK IS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX CARD CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY VARIOUS STAGES OF CONSTRUC- MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED AS TELEPHONE OR WRITTEN NOTIFICA- TION, NOTED ABOVE. TION. B, UI .LDING . ERMI. T - P _ 6 } • 47. 'i'rA" r. r I •. f � '}t' _ .. � '.i., d,• - .; to • � y,M �', A ���'{ .' }a t� i '3.# �j S r � �." Sys^•i g ,�` ��"" 'r�" � r, r ,�`^�t, + �•' .fir' `}: >� '' ' •+tr t�c �' �}���a.����� �� � ���y`�tS"'''` '�.t. � �i �t `�'�+n� y y�f � ';�'tA'w�''�: x�l '� + + n .. "k..;:'�FtT.��5 Y�`i�� ..x .fin �.�`'�r���, �.f�r�'FI?�',! ..l• .. y t :�f�r� � �`p� > p�q t � j;�r - • I °FINE�° Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services sARNsrABLE. + Thomas F.Geiler,Director TEn",o+a Building Division Tom Perry, Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 November 21,2002 Steven J.Bishopric,Inc. Building&Remodeling 1112 Main St.,Unit 17-19 Osterville,MA 02655 1 Re: 10 Kent Rd.,Barnstable Map 280 Parcel 035 Dear Steve: This office is in possession of a letter submitted by you to us stating that the exterior walls were to remain as shown on a plan dated May 23,2001. The site plan,which was submitted with the permit application,shows the outline of the proposed house with"portions of existing structure to remain". After many discussions between us in the building department,prior to the issuance of the permit,it was agreed upon that the first floor walls were to remain and become incorporated into the new structure in order for us to call this a remodel -not a total rebuild. I do understand that evidently when removing the chimney damage occurred to some of the sections of walls and this is why the majority of the walls were removed. Your foreman informed me,by telephone,that the damage was confined to a section of the house opposite Rendezvous Ln.,not the entire front,northeast,and southeast sides. Your foreman informed me that the damaged section was going to be laid down,fixed and put back up. Where is it? We had discussions,prior to permitting,regarding top plate heights. The feeling was that the existing ceiling heights were too low to match the new ceiling so new materials were going to be added to raise these heights. Also,your justification for re-building these walls was the fact that the plans show 2 x 6 exterior walls. While I do agree that the plans show this,by code these are not structurally necessary and if the existing walls could not be saved this should have been addressed during our many discussions. The avenue which you tried so hard to avoid must now be taken. The stop work order remains in effect:; secure the job site and file with the Zoning Board of Appeals for a chapter 6 finding. If you need help in this process please let us know. Sincei , Tom Building Commissioner TP/AW N Steven J. Bishopric, Inc. 508-420-3165 BUU.DING&REMODELING Fax: 508-428-4841 1112 Main St., Unit 17-19, Osterville, MA 02655 Email: sbishopric@stevenjbishopric.com November 20, 2002 Tom Perry Building Commissioner Town Of Barnstable would like to explain the chain of events that led to where we found ourselves on Friday November 15, 2002. We entered into the project after meeting with you and understanding that the walls of the original home be left as it shows on the submitted demolition plan. We removed the top portion of the structure leaving four exterior walls. In the process of dismantling the existing structure we had the top portion of the chimney fall to the floor doing structural damage to the floor and shoe of the exterior walls. The project manager, Bill Schmitz, placed a phone call to you on August 26th and a conversation ensued regarding the damage to the frame of the adjoining areas. That damage was to the floor frame, shoe of the adjacent wall and foundation. We understood the results of that conversation to be that we should repair damage to those areas and could lower the exterior wall to the floor in order to effectively repair and rebuild the damaged wall frame as well as bring it into compliance with present day code. With that understood, we stripped the finishes off the interior in preparation for the rebuilding of those walls. Those walls were braced and left standing while the foundation repairs were made and the floor frame was rebuilt. The opportunity to lower the front exterior wall for repair and rebuilding was done on or about November 12, 2002. We had worked around and kept in place those walls for almost 2 months before we needed to make the repairs and rebuild the wall. When you viewed the wall on November 15, 2002 the studs were cleaned free of the old shoe and plates due to termite damage and the need to increase the width of the shoes and plates and were on the front yard waiting for the crew to layout the new shoes and plates for those studs.We were in mid-stream of rebuilding that wall. We still have 33 feet of original wall standing as well as the entire floor frame, a foot print of 26'x 36', 936 square feet. It was not then nor has it ever been our intention to disregard the mandate set forth upon issuance of the permit for that project, as we believe our ability to comply strictly resulted in large part from the damage, which was caused to the floor and the shoes of the exterior walls by the fall of the chimney. Our Firm has had a great track record with the Building Department for over 18 years. We are always erring on the side of caution. The position we find ourselves in is regrettable and for having placed you there l apologize. However we do need time to perform according to the guide lines you had placed for me and had you come to the site even 2 hours later that wall would have been standing, rebuilt and meeting present day code. n � v r - F g 9 ' y, z r r v � 44 s • t+-w - i' w e s � s �r i aY � �r fi i Id frj•f, 4 +sir ry r t � ' r a iT ti n .Y. v _ t L .e: L 3* I L x +fir e � _ g � � �� � .., —^ram "�• IVfs 91�'t1�� � 1 a it , r a< ; rsy s f II v tw•y.a � x£'�1n W�. � 'T�T�`2''P e'SPFrcPy. y�� ,t } ','7'��5 n,X rv`� arT AN -Alsfmw 0 ON •r.. $ +ate 9 w7 a" - ,Ryvt `'L""'Z 44"" 40, X. ' r v wy7,,. r c 9 .T .�`-,;3 y.� u '"�,.v..• ga.. ,. g**'. n w s J /yty - ��fj e � r ,e�F � �� ;;fir � �.,,>a �.r� ar - , -•` r d�: Yrr'S`� ti� - 4� IN'fe t 22 VA f � f 1. III ' Steven J. Bishopric, Inc. � 508-420-3165 B=ING 8s R'MODE+UNG Fax: 508-428-4841 1112 Main St., Unit 17-19, Osterville, MA 02655 Email: sbishopric@stevenjbishopric.com lee-G August 15, 2002 To whom it may concern, It is the intension of this Firm to comply with the request of the Barnstable Building Commissioner and leave the exterior walls as shown on the submitted demolition plan. The foundation and floor system are being left as is and altered as shown on the floor plan. Respectfully, - Steven ishopric, President . Steven J Bishopric Inc. MAScheck COMPLIANCE REPORT Massachusetts Energy Code Permit# MAScheck Software Version 2.01 Release 3 TITLE:Buono Residence Checked by/Date CITY:Barnstable STATE:Massachusetts HDD: 6137 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 1 or 2 Family,Detached HEATING SYSTEM TYPE: Other(Non-Electric Resistance) DATE: 11-27-2001 DATE OF PLANS: 07-17-02 PROJECT INFORMATION: 10 Kent Road Barnstable,Massachusetts COMPANY INFORMATION: Duckham+McDougal Architects 374 Congress Street,Suite 604 Boston,Massachusetts 02210 COMPLIANCE:Passes Maximum UA=909 Your Home=844 Area or Cavity Cont. Glazing/Door Perimeter R-Value R-Value U-Value UA CEILINGS 3001 30.0 0.0 105 WALLS: Wood Frame, 16"O.C. 4611 19.0 0.0 277 GLAZING:Windows or Doors 917 0.370 339 DOORS 74 0.400 30 FLOORS: Over Unconditioned Space 2761 30.0 0.0 91 FLOORS: Over Outside Air 51 30.0 0.0 2 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications,and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the requirements of the Massachusetts Energy Code. The heating load for this building,and the cooling load if appropriate,has been determined using the applicable Standard Design Conditions found in the Code. The HVAC equipment selected to heat or cool the building shall be no greater than 125%of the design load as specified in Sections 78OCMR 1310 and J4.44. Builder/Designer Date /' i ' 02 T � s � i 7 !r w p., MAScheck COMPLIANCE REPORT Massachusetts Energy Code Permit# MAScheck Software Version 2.01 Release 3 TITLE: Buono Residence Checked by/Date CITY:Barnstable STATE:Massachusetts HDD: 6137 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 1 or 2 Family,Detached HEATING SYSTEM TYPE: Other(Non-Electric Resistance) DATE: 11-27-2001 DATE OF PLANS: 07-17-02 PROJECT INFORMATION: 10 Kent Road Barnstable,Massachusetts COMPANY INFORMATION: Duckham+McDougal Architects 374 Congress Street, Suite 604 Boston,Massachusetts 02210 COMPLIANCE:Passes Maximum UA=909 Your Home=844 Area or Cavity Cont. Glazing/Door Perimeter R-Value R-Value U-Value UA CEILINGS 3001 30.0 0.0 105 WALLS:Wood Frame, 16" O.C. 4611 19.0 0.0 277 GLAZING:Windows or Doors 917 0.370 339 DOORS 74 0.400 30 FLOORS: Over Unconditioned Space 2761 30.0 0.0 91 FLOORS: Over Outside Air 51 30.0 0.0 2 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications,and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the requirements of the Massachusetts Energy Code. The heating load for this building,and the cooling load if appropriate,has been determined using the applicable Standard Design Conditions found in the Code. The HVAC equipment selected to heat or cool the building shall be no greater than 125%of the design load as specified in Sections 780CMR 1310 and J4A.. Builder/Designer Date 1 ®� CSC Ake B ON, F��T O f 0i�`'�r i MAScheck COMPLIANCE REPORT Massachusetts Energy Code Permit# MAScheck Software Version 2.01 Release 3 TITLE:Buono Residence Checked by/Date CITY: Barnstable STATE:Massachusetts HDD: 6137 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 1 or 2 Family,Detached HEATING SYSTEM TYPE: Other(Non-Electric Resistance) DATE: 11-27-2001 DATE OF PLANS: 07-17-02 PROJECT INFORMATION: 10 Kent Road Barnstable,Massachusetts COMPANY INFORMATION: Duckham+McDougal Architects 374 Congress Street, Suite 604 Boston,Massachusetts 02210 COMPLIANCE: Passes Maximum UA=909 Your Home=844 Area or Cavity Cont. Glazing/Door Perimeter R-Value R-Value U-Value UA CEILINGS 3001 30.0 0.0 105 WALLS:Wood Frame, 16"O.C. 4611 19.0 0.0 277 GLAZING: Windows or Doors 917 0.370 339 DOORS 74 0.400 30 FLOORS: Over Unconditioned Space 2761 30.0 0.0 91 FLOORS:Over Outside Air 51 30.0 0.0 2 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications,and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the requirements of the Massachusetts Energy Code. The heating load for this building,and the cooling load if appropriate,has been determined using the applicable Standard Design Conditions found in the Code. The HVAC equipment selected to heat or cool the building shall be no greater than 125%of the design load as specified in Sections 780CMR 1310 and J4.4. 07 Builder/Designer Date • 17 • A&V- jai % x Na. Ir. BM u, ,OFTHETp The Town of Barnstable BARNSTABLE. ' - Department of Health Safety and Environmental Services 9 MASS. 0 1639. `0 P�Eo Mpg' Building Division 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 Inspection Correction Notice Type of Inspection TgOkAnhr�, Location to K.Q , ' c1 Permit Number Owner Builderrs � One notice to remain on job site, one notice on file in Building Department. The following items need correcting: f rye"') iL , s f c�[E .,A f' ,s-e_. r-- -Please_51. -----862=4038 for re-inspection: Inspected by ,�. _ _ �c��ce-C f7 c�n'5 Date 01/09/2002 12:17 FAX 6174220962 Duckham+McDougal Archs 008 ec Paw 06 :V-s u2w � ' 1 Vim® D `l\ r bj 4FG 1 — -N$ ,� .� � �g� �` \'-�� •mac\ \ ` \•� eye a � cl— vo �N l�aw..bd Ie aEp3 01, O '+ F 1 � , 1 P&OU apyx.os jug I g TOWN CLERK If MRWA&H OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE, MASS, BARNSTABLE, 0313,FEB 19 AH 8' 4.8 SUPE>"g1ORM 2: 4 4 No. DIVISION HARRIET BUONO, ) } Plaintiff ) V. ) DANIEL M. CREEDON, CHAIRMAN, GAIL ) �3 NIGHTINGALE, RALPH COPELAND, RON S. ) �., ZD JANSSON, RICHARD L. BOY, THOMAS ) ,zn C zl DeRIEMER,JEREMY GILMORE, and ) co RANDOLPH CHILDS as they are the BARNSTABLE ) � ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, and THOMAS PERRY, as he is THE BUILDING COMMISSIONER ) ►� y r OF THE TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, ) v� Defendants ) NOTICE OF FILING PURSUANT TO MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAWS CHAPTER 40A SEC.17 Now comes Michael D. Ford, Esq., Attorney for Plaintiff, Harriet Buono, in the above captioned matter, and hereby gives notice to the Town Clerk of the Town of Barnstable in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 17 that he caused to be filed this date an Appeal of Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals Decision No.2003-007. The appeal has been filed this day in Barnstable Superior Court, a copy of which is attached hereto. 1 Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury this 18`h day of February, 2003. Plaintiff, Harriet Buono By her Attorney, Michael D. Ford, Esq. P.O. Box 665 W. Harwich, MA. 02671 (508) 430-1900 BBO# 174440 2 CIVIL ACTION DOCKETNO.(S) Trial Court of Massachusetts COVER SHEET Superior Court Department County:_Barnstable ' PLAINTIFF(S) DEFENDANT(S) Harriet Buono Barnstable Zoning Board of . Appeals and Barnstable Building Commissioner ATTORNEY,FIRM NAME,ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE ATTORNEY (if known) Michael D. Ford , Esq . Robert Smith, Town Attorney P .O. Box 665 , W. Harwich, MA 02671 367 Main Street , Hyannis , MA 02601 Board of Bar Overseers number: 17 4 4 4 0 Origin code and track designation Place an x in one box only: ❑ 4. F04 District Court Appeal c.231, s. 97 &104 (After ® 1. F01 Original Complaint trial) (X) ❑ 2. F02 Removal to Sup.Ct. C.231,s.104 ❑ 5. F05 Reactiv �e (Before trial) (F) judgment/O eir Q ❑ 3. FO3 Retransfer to Sup.Ct. C.231,s.102C (X) ❑ 6. E10 Summa y Process Appeal (X) TYPE OF ACTION AND TRACK-DESIGNATION (See regr q si6e)3 13 CODE NO. TYPE OF ACTION (specify) TRACK IS THIS A JURY�ASE? CO2 Zoning Appeal ( F ) ( )Yes (�x No C!rrk The following is a full, itemized and detailed statement of the facts on which plaintiff relies to determine money damages. For this form, disregard double or treble damage claims; indicate single damages only. TORT CLAIMS (Attach additional sheets as necessary) �. Documented medical expenses to date: .1. Total hospital expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Total Doctor expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Total chiropractic expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . I . . . . . $ I . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Total physical therapy expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. Total other expenses (describe) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . , . . . Subtotal $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Documented lost wages and compensation to date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..$ . . . . . . . . . . . . . Documented property damages to date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . ). Reasonably anticipated future medical and hospital expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . _. Reasonably anticipated lost wages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . Other documented items of damages (describe) 3. Brief description of plaintiff's injury, including nature and extent of injury (describe) CO TOTAL $ . b-"y . . . . CONTRACT CLAIMS ,�` (Attach additional sheets as necessary) = �o 'rovide a detailed description of claim(s): TOTAL $. . . . . . . . . . . . . PLEASE IDENTIFY, BY CASE NUMBER, NAME AND COUNTY, ANY RELATED ACTION PENDING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT "I hereby certify that I have complied with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Supreme Judicial Court Uniform Rules on Dispute Resolution (SJC Rule 1:18) requiring that I provide my clients with information about court-connected dispute resolution services and discuss with them the advantages and disadvanta es of the various methods:' Signature of Attorney of Record DATE: 2/18/0 3 )TC-6 mtc005-11/99 D.S.C.1-2000 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE, ss. SUPERIOR COURT 8 No. D3 -I o� � T co �C; D 111_7 JET BUONO, ) `- Plaintiff ) V V. ) v� DANIEL M. CREEDON, CHAIRMAN, GAIL ) COMPLAINT NIGHTINGALE, RALPH COPELAND, RON S. ) APPEAL PURSUANT JANSSON, RICHARD L. BOY, THOMAS ) TO M.G.L. c. 40A, §17 DeRIEMER, JEREMY GILMORE, and ) RANDOLPH CHILDS as they are the BARNSTABLE - U ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, and THOMAS ) "``3AR1 .- L S �l PERRY, as he is THE BUILDING COMMISSIONER ) OF THE TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, Defendants C, INTRODUCTION This Complaint seeks to overturn the Decision of the Board of Appeals of the Town of Barnstable upholding the Decision of the Building Commissioner who issued a Stop Work Order for the partial demolition, alteration and expansion of an existing home on the Plaintiffs property located at 10 Kent Road, Barnstable, MA. The Building Commissioner alleged that agents of the Plaintiff had failed to carry out the work in accordance with the provisions of Building Permit No. 63094 and as a result were proceeding in violation of the Barnstable Zoning Ordinance. Plaintiff states that she was proceeding in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Building Permit and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Barnstable Zoning Ordinance. 1 PARTIES 1. The Plaintiff, HARRIET BUONO is an adult who resides in the Town of Barnstable, Village of Barnstable at 10 Kent Road, Barnstable, Barnstable County, Massachusetts. The Plaintiff has a mailing address of P.O. Box 198, Barnstable, MA 02630. 2. The Defendants are the members of the BOARD OF APPEALS of the Town of Barnstable with a business office at the Town Hall, 367 Main Street, Hyannis, Barnstable County, MA. The following Defendants are individuals who at all material times were the members who heard and decided the Special Permit decision from which this appeal is taken. a. DANIEL M. CREEDON, with a mailing address of 49 Links Lane, Marstons Mills, MA 02648. b. GAIL NIGHTINGALE, with a mailing address of 32 Sunset Lane, Osterville, MA 02655. C. RALPH COPELAND, with a mailing address of 355 Bridge Street, Osterville, MA 02655. d. RON S. JANSSON, Chairman with a mailing address of P.O. Box 147, Barnstable, MA 02630. e. THOMAS DERIEMER, with a mailing address of 24 Aspen Way, Osterville, MA 02655. f. RICHARD L. BOY, with a mailing address of 50 Sterling Road, Hyannis, MA 02601. g. JEREMY GILMORE, with a mailing address of 83 Dunaskin Road, Centerville, MA 02632. h. RANDOLPH CHILDS, with a mailing address of 34 Shirley Point Road, Centerville, MA 02632. 2 3. The Defendant, THOMAS PERRY, is the Building Commissioner of the Town of Barnstable and has a business a mailing address of 367 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601. JURISDICTION 4. This Complaint is a zoning appeal and pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 17, the Superior Court has jurisdiction. FACTS 5. The Plaintiff is the owner of real property, together with the buildings located thereon at 10 Kent Road (169 Redezvous Lane), Barnstable, (the "Premises"). 6. The Premises consists of approximately .63 f acres and is located in a RFl Residential Zoning District and the AP Groundwater Overlay Protection District. The Premises is shown on Town of Barnstable Assessor's Map 280 as Parcel 035. 7. Located on the Premises was an existing single-family home for which a building permit was issued for the alteration and expansion of said dwelling under Building Permit No. 63094. 8. As a condition of the Building Permit, certain portions of the existing house were to remain so that the Building Permit could be considered an alteration, expansion and conversion of the existing residence. 9. Under a letter dated August 15, 2002, Mr. Steven Bishopric, agent for the Plaintiff, confirmed to the Building Commissioner his intention to leave "the exterior walls as shown on the submitted demolition plan." The Demolition Plan referred to is dated July 17, 2002 and is Sheet D 101 of the permit set of plans 3 filed with the Building Permit application. 10. The Plaintiff, through her agents, caused the work on the Premises to.proceed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Building Permit. 11. On or about November 13, 2002, tip 1�~�.missiyner,bra ':it that agents of the Plaintiff had removed more of the existing dwelling then was authorized, issued a Stop Work Order(the "Order") for the partial demolition, alteration and expansion of the existing structure, and on November 21, 2002, sent a letter to Mr..Bishopric setting forth the reasons for the Stop Work Order. A copy of the November 21, 2002 letter is attached to the appeal filed as Exhibit 12. On December 6, 2002, the Plaintiff caused an appeal of the Order(decision of the Building Commissioner), to be filed with the Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to the provisions of G.L.c. 40A §8 and 15. Plaintiffs appeal sought to overrule the decision of the Building Commissioner as set forth in the Stop Work Order. A copy of the appeal is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 13. The Zoning Board of Appeals conducted a Public Hearing on January 22, 2003. At the conclusion of the hearing on January 22, 2003, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 3 to overturn and 2 to uphold the decision of the Building Commissioner. The 3 members votingto overturn the decision of the Building g Commissioner found that a clear and definitive Demolition Plan had been submitted by the Plaintiff that showed precisely what walls were to remain, and further that the Building Permit was predicated on that plan and that the work that the Plaintiffs agents were performing on site was proceeding substantially in 4 conformance with that plan. 14. Pursuant to the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.40A, §15, the concurring vote of 4 members of the Defendant, Board of Appeals, was necessary to reverse the decision of the Building Commissioner. 15. The Board rendered a written decision in connection with the appeal, said decision being dated and filed with the Barnstable Town Clerk on January 30, 2003 as Decision No. 2003-007. 16. A true, accurate and attested copy of the Board's decision is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". COUNTI 17. The Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the averments of Paragraphs 1 through 16. 18. The Plaintiff is aggrieved by the decision of the Defendant Board of Appeals and is a person aggrieved within the meaning of M.G. L. c. 40A §17. 19. The Decision of the Board of Appeals exceeded its authority as follows: A. The Decision is incorrect as a matter of law in that it purports to uphold the decision of the Building Commissioner, which decision was factually inaccurate in its reliance upon an incorrect plan. B. The Decision is incorrect as a matter of law in that it purports to uphold the decision of the Building Commissioner, which decision constitutes an error of law since the work caused to be undertaken by the Plaintiff is in accordance with the Barnstable Zoning Ordinance. C. The Decision is otherwise arbitrary, capricious, based on untenable grounds and exceeds the authority of the Board. 5 WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable Court to issue an order and judgment as follows: 1. That the Decision of the Barnstable Board of Appeals exceeded its authority, and as a result is null and void. 2. That the Decision of the Building Commissioner be reversed. 3. That the Plaintiff be allowed to proceed in accordance with the terms and conditions of Building Permit No. 63094. 4. That the Plaintiff be awarded her attorney's fees and costs in prosecuting this action. 5. For such other and further relief as this Court may deem meet and just under the circumstances. Plaintiff, Harriet Buono, By her attorney, Michael D. Ford, Esq. G P. O. Box 665, 72 Main Street W. Harwich, MA. 02671 (508)430-1900 BBO#174440 Date: February 18, 2003 6 I . y7yCt IHI RARNSTABM MARL TOWN OF BARNSTABLE - - --- Zoning Board of Appeals Application for Other Powers Date Received For office use only: Town Clerk's Office: Appeal# Hearing Date Decision Due The undersigned hereby applies to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the reasons indicated: Applicant Name: _Harriet Buono Phone: 508-430-1900 Applicant Address: c/o Michael D, Ford, Esq.. P.O. Box 665. W. Harwich MA 02671 Property Location: 10 Kent Road (169 Rendezvous Lane), Barnstable Property Owner: Harriet Buono , Phone: Address of Owner: P.O. Box 198, Barnstable, MA 02630 Assessor's Map/Parcel Number: 280/35 Zoning District: _F1 Groundwater Overlay District: 6P This is a request for: [ ] Enforcement Action [X] Appeal of Administrative Official's Decision [ ] Other General Powers -Please Specify: Which Section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance and/or MGL Chapter 40A are you appealing to the Zoning Board of Appeals? Ordinance Section 5-3 2(1) Section 4-4 3(l)and Section 4-4 6(1) and M G L c 40A U.7.8 and 15 Nature of Appeal & Description of Request: This is an appeal of the Decision of Building Commissioner which Decision consists of a Stop Work Order dated November 15 2002 and letter dated Novemb r 21. 2002 co i s of which are attached hereto Building Permit No 63094 was issued on August 16 2002 by the Buildina Commissioner,for the purpose of remodeling (altering and expanding) an existing stir gle family dwelling, condition of the permit was that certain portions of the existing home were to remain in place all as shown on a demolition plan submitted with the Building Permit application Portion of the walls shown on the Demolition Plan which were to remain have been disassembled in part as a result of damage caused by the collapse of the chimney during the course of the demolition of portions of the existing house The wall sections were disassembled in the course of repairing the walls the floor an r n frnm thn Ag ausea pV the chimney accident. Prior to the wall sections being re-assembler) the ilding Comn;; ion r blaced a Stop Work Order on the job and subsequently issued the letter dated November 21 2002 Aq arently the BwId= Commissioner reasons in his latter that as a result of the removal of a portion Of the walls whlrh warp to amain the project can no longer be viewed as an alteration within the meaning of Section 4 4 3(1) of the Zoning Ordinance and therefore would need a M r l c 4 A. rom the d n, 4 of Appeals as a reconstruction He has apparently reached this conclusion notwithstanding the fart that the oriaiaaLppured foundation cellar floor, portions of the existing floor floor iolsts and portions of terior wails still remain Further, it appears that the Building Commissioner is now taking the position that the wall sections which were clearly shown on the Demolition Ran to be removed Were requireri to hP IPft jn place The Ap ' ant ra sts that the Board review the Ruilriinn ornmissioner'c decision and find that ah a sting re nce ,� ,,,at eno of the pre axi ��rdo remains so as to consider the project an alteration there having been no mat rial d viation from the plans ups which the Buildina Permit was issued and the aryposed improvements come within th meaning of Section 4 4 3(1)A of the Zoning Ordinance, Applicant suggests that such a finding w re the disputed wall sections were damaged as a result of the chimney coil a sa (spa Section 4 4 6(1)). The oroDosed altered and expanded house meets all of the set back requirements of the Zoning District jn whj h the lot is located'and therefore the only non-rnnformity e_ ;sting is the size cf the lot(27 270sa ft of area where 1 a rP is required). The Applicant sPPks a reversal of the Building Commissioner' Stogy Work Order and November 21 2002 Decision requiring Zoning RPliaf and finding that the q�ject may procaPrt in ar��r�+���e ��,�a � wdth SPrtdon 4 4.3(1)A and if required Sertinn 4-4 60)of the Toning Ordinance Attach Additional Sheet if Necessary The existing house was non-conforming being partially located within the front yard. This non-conformity has been eliminated in the design of the altered house. Application for Other Powers - Page 2 Existing Level of Development of the Property- Number of Buildings: Present Use(s): —Single family home Gross Floor Area: 1796 sq. ft(footprint). 1808 sq, ft.(net living space) Is the property located in a designated Historic District?...................................................... Yes [X] No [ J if yes [X J - Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Date Approved (if applicable) 10/24/01 [ ] - Hyannis Main Street Waterfront Historic District Date Approved (if applicable) Is the building:a designated Historic Landmark?...........................:................... ............:...... Yes [ ] No [X] Have you applied for a building permit?............................:...................................................Yes [X] No [ ] Have you been refused a building permit? ...........................................................................Yes [ J No [X] The following information,•as applicable, should be submitted with the application at the time of filing. Failure to do so may result in a denial of your request. 6 Three (3)copies of the completed application form, each with original signatures. • Three (3)copies of a certified property survey(plot plan)and one (1) reduced copy (8 1/2"x 11" or 11"x 17") showing the dimensions of the land, all wetlands, water bodies, surrounding roadways and the location of the existing improvements on the land. • Three (3)copies of a proposed site improvement plan and one (1) reduced copy (8 1/2"x 11"or 11"x 17"). • The applicant may submit any additional supporting documents to assist the Board in making its determination. Signature: Date: December 5, 2002 Applicant's or RePre ntative's Signature Representative's P.O. Box 665. W. Harwich. MA 02671 Phone: 508-430-1900 Address: Fax No.: 508-430-8662 Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services _ WMMW"Br& Thomas F.Geller,Director VAX Building Division Tom Perry, Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 Office: SCE-862-4038 Fax; 508=790-6230 November 21.2002 d. Steven J.Bishopric,Inc. Building 8c Remodeling 1112 Main St.,Unit 17-19 Osterville,MA 02655 Re;10 Kent Rd,,Barnstable'Map 280 Parcel 035 Dear Steve: This office is in possession of a letter submitted byru to us stating that the exterior walls were to remain as shown on a plan dated May 23,2001. The site plan,which was submitted with the permit application,shows the outline of the proposed house with"portions of existing structure to remain". After many discussions between us in the building department,prior to the issuance of the permit,it was agreed upon that the first floor walls were to remain and become incorporated into the new structure in order for us to call this a remodel not a total rebuild. I do understand that evidently when removing the chimney damage occurred to some of the sections of walls and this is whythe majority of the walls were removed. Your foreman informed mc,by telephone,.that the damage was confined to a section of the house opposite Rendezvous Ln.,not the entire front,northeast,and southeast sides. Your foreman informed me that the damaged section was going to be laid down,fixed and put back up. Where is it? We had discussions,prior to perrnirdng,regarding top plate heights. The feeling was that the existing ceiling heights were too low to match the new ceding so new materials %tre going to be added to raise these heights. Also,your justification for n-building these walls was the fact that the plaru show 2 x 6 exterior walls. Wiule I do agree that the plans show this,by code these are not structurally necessary and if the existing walls could not be saved this should have been addressed during our many discussions. The avenue which you tried so lord to avoid must now be taken. The stop.work order remains in effect:; secure the job site and file with the Zoning Board of Appeals for a chapter 6 finding. If you need help in this process;please let us low. Sincei Tom 5 Building Commissioner TP/AW �y -40- VOM J. I WIN _ _ _ � :a_-ice, -� ���.,� — - "'• - — - ��""� •�'�--� � ��' _e"�..��,-x�rsi- f�"-'� 3z��� - �v�L+-'s7,ice. _; ,�_-�=�-=-��=sj=�;_�'i ��.--ram'�---.---.-.� - ��!r_.=.; -..`Y�_ �'.� ♦_�r4�•=�_� .--�� -` �-''3+ �t- �� ��r.��• -tom.-+fir 3.� r �-�/ __ ��i�� �,�F � _ � i ±?a. =�,-:�--a`•-=-�-=.t-�� -`-;--sue -T 'i'L � -�•��-'���=- •; OWN G r,K VE IIAMSrABLE. lEo � c Ja J, 30 Town of Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals Decision and Notice Appeal 2003-007 - Buono Appeal of the Building Commissioner's Stop Work Order dated November 15, 2002 Applicant seeks reversal of the Commissioner's decision and a finding that the project may proceed as-of-right. Summary: Not Overruled Petitioner: I larriet Buono Property Address: 10 Kcnt Road(169 Rendezvous Lane);Barnstable,NIA Map/Parcel: Afap 280,Parcel 035 Zoning: Residential FV "Zoning District Relief Requested & Background The subject property is'located at 10 hent Road (also addressed 169 Rendezvous Lane) in Barnstable. According to the Assessor's record, the lot is a 0.63-acre lot and was developed with a one-story, three- bedroom, single-family dwelling building in 1951. It has a living area of 1,340 sq.ft. The property also had an attached garage of 400 sq.ft. and a finished attic of 468 sq.ft. The total gross area of development was 1,808 sq.ft. The applicant was issued a building permit for the alteration and expansion of the dwelling. Part of the existing structure was to be demolished. Demolition and reconstruction had begun on the building and work was underway when sometime around mid November 2002, the Building CoMIT.Ussioner was notified by an abutter that most of the structure had when been removed. The Building Commissioner visited the property and on November 15, 2002,issued a stop work order. On December 10, 2002, the applicant, through her representative submitted two applications to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Appcal 2003-007 is appealing the November 15, 2002, Stop Work Order issued by the Building Cotnnussioner for the partial demolition, alteration and expansion of the existing structure. ® Appeal 2003-008 is an application for a Special Permit in accordance with Section 4-4.3(2) and findings under i\IGL Chapter 40A, Section 6 for the demolition and reconstruction of a single-family dwelling on an undersized lot. The special permit relief was sought as an alternative to the appeal of the Building Comet iissioner. Procedural & Hearing Summary: This appeal was filed at the Town Clerk's Office and at the Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals on November 07, 2002. An extension of time for holding the hearing and for filing of the decision was executed between the applicant and the Board. A public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals was duly advertised and notice sent to all abutters in accordance with NIGL Chapter 40A. The hearing was opened January 22, 2003, at which time the Board did not overrule the Building Commissioner's November 15, 2002 stop work order but did issue the Special Permit for the demolition and reconstruction. This decision deals with Appeal 2003-007,which seeks to reverse the order of the Building Commissioner. Board Members deciding this appeal were, Gail Nightingale, Ron S.Jansson,Thomas A. DeRieimer,Jeremy wI. Gilmore and Chairman Daniel, Cre�,,euon. Attorney Michael Ford represented the applicant at the hearing. He identified the location of the property and cited that all permits for the redevelopment of the dwelling had been obtained. He noted that the applicant had originally been issued a demolition permit from the Old Dings Highway Historic District Committee which subsequently was appealed and ultimately upheld in the courts. When faced with the issue of demolition and rebuilding under the Zoning Ordinances, the applicant tool: steps to assure that the development would be a reconstruction. The Old Kings Highway pernut was modified and the building was adjusted so that a substantial part of the first floor walls; basement and floor deck could be incorporated and reused. Mr. lord stated that retaining those sections of the building resulted in the as-of-right issuance of Building Pernut Number 63094 pursuant to Section 4-4.3(l) A for a part demolition, alteration and expansion of the existing dwelling. A memorandum in support of the appeal was presented. It was noted that the permit drawings as submitted to the Building Division and upon which the Building Permit had been issued identified the walls and areas to be retained. rill of which were secured and maintained until, by accident, the existing chimney collapsed. As a result of the chimney collapse, some of the walls initially intended to be retained were damaged and buckled. However, 33 linear feet of the first floor walls remained and much of that wall area is to be incorporated into the new structure. I-Ie noted that upon the collapse of the chimney, the contractor notified the Building Division of the accident including the fact that some of the walls had fallen. Mr. Ford stated that this action was not the result of deliberate intention or malice on the part of anyone. A mistake and accident occurred. The Building Commissioner could pernut the work to continue pursuant to Section 4-4.6(1) for damaged or destroyed nonconforming buildings. Tom Perry, Building Commmissioner spoke and noted that when the permit was issued, the applicant fully understood that the first floor walls and floor deck were to ro..main in order for the permit to be issued as and alteration/expansion. The site plan presented showed the area to be retained with cross-hatching. It appears that over the course of the permitting process, more of the walls were removed than originally agreed upon. Consequently, the removal of virtually all of the walls rendered the project a total demolition. The Board discussed the issue and the Building Commissioner noted that there is no clear definition in the Ordinance for demolition and reconstruction. As a result, he has set forth that the first floor walls and floor deck must remain for the proposal to be considered an alteration of the existing structure. The public was invited to speak and Robert Alberts of 22 Kent Road submitted a photo showing the extent of what remains. He stated that the chimney was taken down away from the walls and that it was not till after the chimney was down that the walls came down. Kenneth Chesley of 34 Kent Road stated that he did not object to the redevelopment or reconstruction of the home as it is beneficial to the neighborhood. Dan Mulling noted the problem to be that most lots in the Town are non-conforming and that thus issue of demolition and rebuilding needs to be resolved on a much larger scale. Charles Baskin of 59 Salten Point 2 Road noted that the aPp licant modified the Old King g s Highway Historic District Comn-nission Certificate in order to avoid having to come to the Zoning Board for the special permit. He contends that it was the applicant's intention to demolish the dwelling from the start. Findings of Fact: At the hearing of January 22, 2003, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. Appeal 2003-007 is.that of Harriet Buono appealing the Decision of the Building Commissioner,in which a Stop Work Order dated November 15,2002,was issued and reaffirmed in a letter dated November 21, 2002. The applicant is seeking reversal of the Commissioner's decision and a finding that the project may proceed as-of-right pursuant to Section 4-4.3(1) A or Section 4-4.6(1) for damaged or destroyed nonconforming buildings. The property is commonly addressed as 10 Kent Road (169 Rendezvous Lane),Barnstable, MA and is shown on Assessor's Map 280 as Parcel 035. It is in the Residential F-1 Zoning District. 2. The Residential F-1 Zoning District requires one-acre minimum lot area for a developable lot. This lot is a 0.63-acre lot that is non-conforming to today's minimum area. The lot had been developed in 1951 with a one-story, three-bedroom, single-family dwelling. That structure had a living area of 1,340 sq.ft., an attached garage of 400 sq.ft. and finished attic of 468 sq.ft. The total gross area of the prior dwelling was 1,808 sq.ft. 3. The Building Commissioner issued Building Permit Number 63094 for the as-of-right alteration and expansion and part demolition of the dwelling pursuant to Section 4-4.3(1) A. In issuing the permit, the Commissioner had required that the first floor walls and floor deck be retained and incorporated into the new structure. The Building Commissioner has set this as his standard for determining a redevelopment proposal as an alteration/expansion or a demolition/reconstruction. 4. Over the course of the work on the prenuses, certain the walls had collapsed and/or removed. The Building Comnussioner then saw it appropriate to issue a stop work order in that in his opinion significant walls had been removed to constitute a demolition/reconstruction requiring a special per from the Zoning Board. . 5. Thcrc were a series of plans submitted through the permitting process. The July 17, 2002 plans for the home identified.the walls to be preserved and incorporated into the new structure. 6. The applicant has been issued a Certificate of appropriateness from the Old Kings Iighway Iistoric Commission. The initial certificate was for demolition of the existing dwelling that was later modified to allow part of the structure to remain so that a building permit could be issued as-of-right pursuant to Section 4-4.3(1) :1 of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. The applicant has appropriately appealed the November 15, 2002 stop work order issued by the Building Commissioner as prescribed in NIGL Chapter40A. The vote was as follows: AYE: Gail Nightingale,Thomas A. DeRiemer and Ron Jansson. NAY: Jeremy Gilmore and Daniel I1. Creedon 3 r J. a 1. Decision: Based on the findings of fact, a motion was duly made and seconded to overrule the December 15, 2002 it decision of the Building Commissioner that issued a'stop work order on the subject property. The vote was as follows: AYE: Gail Nightingale and Ron Janssen. NAY: Jeremy Gilmore, Thomas A. DeR.iemer and Daniel M. Creedon Those voting in the negative cited that a clear and definite "demolition plan" had been submitted by the applicant that showed precisely what walls were to remain. The building permit is predicated on that plan and the work on the site is proceeding substantially in conformance to that plan. Ordered: Appeal 2003-007 did not overrule the Building Commissioner as it take four votes of the five members to do so. Appeals of this decision,if any, shall be made pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 17,within twenty (20) days after the date of the filing of this decision. A copy of which must be filed in the office of the.Town Clerk. i el M. CredoD en, Chairman Date Signed i ATRUE COPY AT'(FST L4XI Tower Clerk BARNSTABLE iBk 16447 PsI16 621131 02 24-2003 a 02 m 24g-� INV CLERK EAMSURM MAM PIED MAR��s M FEB 2 1 AM 8, 46 ICI Town of Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals Decision and Notice—Error in Script2Z/p3 As related to the decision rendered'tor Appeal 2003-008 - Buono Special Permit- Section 4-4.3 Nonconforming Buildings & MGL Chapter 40A, Section 6 Demolition and reconstruction with expansion of a dwelling on a non-conforming undersized lot. Summary: Granted with Conditions Petitioner: Harriet Buono Property Address: 19 Kent Rend(169 Rendezve)w 1.,ane),Barnstable,Mrs Map/Parcel: Map 280,Parcel 035 Zoning: Residential F1 Zoning District An error in script was identified in the decision for Appeal 2003-008 Buono, filed with the Town Clerk on January 30, 2003. Condition Number 1 in the decision cites a date of the final site plan for the reconstruction as June 07, 2002. This date is in error and it should have cited a final revised date of July 09,2002. Condition No. 1 of:Decision 2003-008 is corrected to read as follows: I. Location of the dwelling shall be as shown on a plan entitled"Site Plan—Proposed House Improvements at 10 Kent Road (1 69 Rendezvous Lane),Barnstable,MA. For"Harriet Residence" showing the existing and proposed location and additions to the dwelling, last revised date of July 09, 2002. A copy of which has been submitted to the file and is the plan upon which the original permit for partial demolition, alteration and expansion of the dwelling was issued to the property. ispectfully Submitted: l ZTthr P.TYaczyk, Pruicipal Planner February 21., 2003 Op9MErar, BARNS M 1..E, �/1 1 t eq,k � rry 1 f p"A NWABLE , 7M] YU4 30 APB 8: ✓4 i699 ,0�' AtFp MpY� Town of Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals ]Decision and Notice Appeal 2003-008 - Buono Special Permitµ Section 4-4.3 Nonconforming Buildings &MGL Chapter 40A, Section 6 Demolition and reconstruction with expansion of a dwelling on a non-conforining undersized lot. Summary: Granted witli Conditions Petitioner. IIa.rriet Buono Property Address: 10 Kent Road(169 Rende2vous Lane),Bunstable,MA Map/Parcel: Map 280,Parcel 035 Zoning: Residential F1 Zoning District Relief Requested & Background The subject property is located at 10 Kent Road (also addressed 169 Rendezvous Lane) in Barnstable. According to the Assessor's record, the lot is a 0.63-acne lot and was developed with a one-story, three- bedroom, single-fainily dwelling building in 1951. It has a living area of 1,340 sq.f, The property also had an attached garage of 400 sq.ft. and a finished attic of 468 sq.ft. The total.gross area of development was 1,808 scl.ft. The applicant was issued a building permit for the alteration and expansion of the dwelling. Part of the existing structure was to be demolished. Demolition and reconstruction had begun on the property and work was underway when sometime around mid November of 2002,the Building Conunissioner was notified that most of the structure had been demolished. The Building Corrmiissionet visited the property and on November 15, 2002,issued a stop work order. On December 10, 2002, the applicant, through her representative submitted two applications to the Zoning Board of Appeals. ® Appeal 2003-007 is appealing the November 15, 2002, Stop Work Order issued by the Building Commissioner for the part demolition,alteration and expansion of the existing structure. r Appeal 2003-008 is an application for a Special Permit in accordance with Section 4-4.3(2) and findings under MGL Chapter 40A,Section 6 for the demolition and reconstruction of a single-family dwelling on an undersized lot. The special permit relief was sought in the alternative to the appeal of the Building Cotrunissioner. Procedural& Hearing Summary: 'Plus appeal was filed at the Town Clerk's Office and at the Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals on November 07, 2002. An extension of tithe For holding the hearing and for flung of the decision was executed between the applicant and the Board. A public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals was duly advertised and notice sent to all abutters in accordance with MGL Chapter 40A. The hearing was opened January 22, 2003,at which dine the Board did not overrule the Building Commissioner's November 15,2002 stop work order. That order therefore stands and the applicant than preceded to seek the Special Pernut for the demolition and reconstruction. 1`liat permit was granted with.conditions. This decision deals'With Appeal 2003-008 for that special pernut. Board Members deciding this appeal were,Gail Nightingale, Ron S. Jansson,Thomas A. DeRiemer, Jeremy Gilmore and Chairman Daniel M. Creedon. Attorney Michael Ford represented the applicant at the hearing. I Ie explained the permitting process to date, noting that the applicant had.received all approvals froth the Old Kings Highway Historic District Committee. They include both a permit for total demolition of the building as well as a later modification for a partial demolition. He stated that the modification permitted the home to be pivoted so as to allow for several wall to be retained and incorporated into the redevelopment of the dwelling. He also cited that it proposal had received an Order of Conditions from the Conservation Comrnission and that the dwelling was to be connected to :'own sewers and would not need a septic permit frorn the Board of Health. He noted that the original foundation is to remain as will the first floor decking and 33 linear feet of wall area reused in the reconstruction. Mr. Ford and the Board reviewed the proposed new dwelling. It was determined that the dwelling would have approximately 3,800 sq.ft. of living area, an additional 400 sq.ft. of garage space and some 1,100 sq.ft. of covered porch and open deck areas. The total footprint of the structure was given as 2,700 sq.ft. Mr.. Ford stated that the proposed home was in keeping with the size of other homes in the neighborhood and would not be a detriment to the surrounding neighborhood. In fact he stated it would be a benefit and an improvement. The public was invited to speak and Charles Baskin of 59 Salten Point Road questioned if the Board could issue a special permit and findings to the site given that no home exists and the rights invested in the prior structure were forfeited upon its demolition. Findings of Fact: At the hearing of January 22,2003, the Board trade the following findings of fact: 1. In Appeal 2003-008, the applicant is Harriet Buono seeping a Special Permit in accordance with Section 4-4.3(2) and MGL Chapter 40A,Section 6 for the reconstruction of a single-family dwelling on an undersized lot. 2. The relief is sought in the alternative to Appeal 2003-007. That appeal sought to overrule the Building Commissioner and was previously rejected by a vote of the Board. The subject property is commonly addressed as 10 Kent Road (169 Rendezvous Lane), Barnstable,MA as shown on Assessor's Map 280, Parcel 035. It is in a Residential F1 Zoning District that:today requires one-acre minimum lot area. 3. The property is a 0.63-acre non-conforming lot and was developed with a one-story, three-bedroom, single-fancily dwelling building in 1951. It had a living area of 1,340 sq.ft. The property also had an attached garage of 400 sqft and finished attic of 468 sq.ft. The total gross area of development was 15808 sq.ft. 4. Partial demolition of the dwelling had begun under a building pert-nit issued with the understanding that the first floor outer walls would remain. However, through the course of events much of the walls were destroyed and are now gone. Under the criteria used by the Building Commissioner, this work now 2 r. constitutes a demolition and reconstruction. The applicant is before the Board seeking a special pernvt for continuation of the non-conforming lot as a developable lot and a finding under MGL Chapter 40A, Section 6 with reference to the reconstruction on the lot. 5. The applicant had received all approvals from the Old Kings Highway Historic District Committee the Conservation Commission. The dwelling is to be connected to Town sewers and to public water. 6. The applicant had been issued a building permit and has proceeded with redevelopment on the.lot in conformance to the plans approved, The plans conform to all setback requirements for the zoning district. 7. With regards to MGL Chapter 40A,Section 6, this reconstruction with expansion intensifies the extent of development on the lot, however,it does not intensify any nonconformity. The proposed reconstruction complies with all required seatbacks and the proposed new dwelling would not be substantially inore detrimental to the neighborhood than the former. dwelling. The vote was as follows: AYE: Gail Nightingale,Thomas A. DeRiemer, Jeremy Gilmore and Daniel M. Creedon, NAY: Ron S.Jansson Decision- Based on the findings of fact,a motion was duly made and seconded to grant the appeal to permit the demolition and reconstruction with expansion of a single family dwelling on an undersized non-conforrrting lot. The reconstruction shall conform to all required setbacks for the zoning district and is subject to the follm;ving conditions: 1. Location of the dwelling shall be as shown on a plan entitled"Site Plan—Proposed House Improvements at 101.ent Road(169 Rendezvous Lane),Barnstable,MA. For"Harriet Residence" showing the existing and proposed location and additions to the dwelling, dated June 07,2002. A copy of which has been subtrutted to the file and is the plan upon which the original permit for partial demolition, alteration and expansion of the dwelling was issued to the property. 2. The dwelling shall be built substantially in conformance to plans present to the Board entitled "Buono Residence",drawn by Duckham + McDougal Architects, dated July 17,2002, consisting of 21 sheets. 3. The property is connected to Town sewer and served by public water. 4. Demolition and reconstruction shall comply with Health and Building Divisions without variance and shall comply with any Order of Conditions issued by the Conservation Commission. 5. This principal building- the single-family dwelling with an attached garage and outdoor deck—shall be considered fiall build-out of the lot and it shall not be expanded in area or in footprint without further permission form this Board. 6. The grant of this special permit does not authorize any exception from the flood regulations of Section 5-3 of the Zoning Ordinance.The reconstruction shall conform to all requirements of that section, 3 including compliance with all applicable building codes, federal and/or state approvals and requirements. The vote was as follows: AYE: Gail Nightingale,Thomas A. DeRierner, Jeremy Gilmore and Daniel M, Creedon, NAY: Ron S.Jansson M.r. Jansson expressed that he voted in the negative because he sees the reconstruction as be very substantial. He stated that the proposed expansion is an intensification of development on that lot and that the proposed reconstruction with the expansion would be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the former dwelling. Ordered: Special Permit 2003-008 is granted with conditions. This decision must be recorded at the Registry of Deeds for it to be in effect. The relief authorized by tEs decision must be exercised in one year. Appeals of this decision,if any, shall be made pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 17,within twenty (20) days after the date of the filing of this decision. A copy of which must be filed in the office of the Town Clerk, c � Daniel M. Creed.on, Chairman Date Signed 1,Linda Hutchenrider, Clerk of the Town of Barnstable, Barnstable County,Massachusetts, hereby certify that twenty (20) days have elapsed since the Zoning Board of.Appeals filed tlus decision and that no appeal of the decision has been filed in the office of the Town Clerk. Signed and sealed this O�� day of under the pains and penalties of perjury. Linda. Hutchenrider,Town Clerk h 3 i MICHAEL D. FORD, ESQUIRE ATTORNEY AT LAW 72 MAIN STREET, P. O. BOX 665 WEST HARWICH, MA. 02671 TEL. (508) 430-1900 FAX(508) 430-8662 EMAIL: mdfesq@capecod.net February 25, 2003 Tom Perry, Building Commissioner Town Hall 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601. Re: Buono - Appeal 2003-008 Dear Mr. Perry: Per your request, enclosed please find a copy of the Decision recorded in Barnstable County Registry of Deeds in Book 16447, Page 116. As always, thank you for your cooperation and assistance with this matter. Very-truly y rs, Michael D. Ford MDF/mbf Enclosure Robert Allen Box 1184 Barnstable, MA 02630 January 8, 200 � 3 _9 Dear Mr. Allen; 1V—IS,ON Tonight while trying to read and relax I received a phone call from Jim Healy. Jim is Harriet Buono's fiance. He brought to my attention a recent article by ~ Kathleen Burge, Globe Staff Reporter dated 12/19/02 on a decision rendered t aq 0 against neighbors in a plight to stop"a project".............soundfamiliar. The scenario is similar;the Ayaslis's wanted to renovate their oceanfront house overlooking Megansett Harbor in North Falmouth;the neighbors vowed to fight the expansion to the end. The neighbors lost this spat and had to fork up damages in the amount of$371,000 and legal fees. This also violated the Ayaslis's"civil rights". Jim also faxed copies of recent letters, one in particular, sent by you regarding damages to the entrance island with Rendesvous Acres Association letter head. As President of the association you represent the entire group not just a few, and the few being in Ms Buono's dispute; yourself, Charles and Marilyn Fuller, Sheila Bearse and Bob and Lois Alpert. I will not allow you to continue misrepresenting this association to the town fathers. I will contact the town attorney, commissioner and others if this is not stopped. In the future, do not use Rendezvous Acres Association stationery, this is your battle with Ms Buono not the majorities. I have canvassed as many neighbors as possible, within an hour's time, and they are listed below who do not have just cause to stop this renovation. In fact want to know......... "What is going on? Ken&Marlene Chesley Pat&Marie Curren John& Joan Krainin John&Lou Ann Persson John&Maureen Sproha Quin&Hedi Shea Suzanne Schlott Paul& Susan Ware Jeff Lindsay Sincerely, A concerned neighbor who wants to keep his money. cc: Richard Clark, Town Councilman, John Klimm, Barnstable Town Manager Tom Perry, Building Commissioner Y: f f� IVOL) ID .`2MZ7 e c t } oft l e f 7 f�f 7r ►; --tiff ��f ��« s� - 3 �� � f/� 7 s f A- lf ANK } } I. t 1 ♦ 1 f + � i + 1♦ i i•` \.'+' •,� 1 , �`- .\- - � ;`T Jam, h \T `• � ' •` '\` . `� t + i \ k��` r (4-e ce —v --p 4- ,- _ 1 . elk 4�t T `� tit 1 I I I' i . j 1 � I .� �, � _ .�� • o QJ Garnick & Scudder, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 32 MAIN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 398 HYANNIS,MASSACHUSETTS 02601 GERALD S.GARNICK (508)771-2320 LOIS M.FARMER JOYCE W.SCUDDER (508)771-3304(Facsimile) PAUL J.ATTEA December 28, 2001 Peter DiMatteo, Building Commissioner Barnstable Town Hall 367 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Dear Mr. DiMatteo: It is our understanding that Harriet Buono has or will make applications for a demolition permit and a building permit concerning 10 Kent Road, Barnstable, Massachusetts, Map 280 Parcel 035. It is our understanding that Ms. Buono intends to demolish the existing house and place a new structure on the locus. It is also our understanding that the property is non-conforming. We would like to draw your attention to the decision of the Massachusetts Land Court in Dugas, et al. v. Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals, et al., Land Court Miscellaneous Case No.: 246863. The situation in that case is analogous to Ms. Buono's plans for building on the subject lot. In the Dugas case, as with Buono, the existing house was on an undersized lot. In Dugas, the Court decided that the building permit could not issue as a matter of right and that the applicant would be obligated to go before the Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals who would then have to conduct a hearing to determine whether the residence to be constructed on the locus is a"reconstruction" of the former residence on the locus, as the term "reconstruction" is used in the "second except clause" of the first sentence of G.L. c. 40A, § 6, ¶1. I am enclosing for your review a copy of that decision. Accordingly, we suggest that any application for a building permit must be submitted to the Town of Barnstable Zoning Board of Appeals for a hearing on the question of whether the proposed new construction on the Buono lot will be a reconstruction of the original structure. +M Letter to Peter DiMatteo December 28, 2001 Page 2 We look forward to hearing from you in this regard. Very truly yours, Lois M. Farmer, Esq. LMF/slg Enclosure(s) cc: Robert Alberts QUERY PROPERTY: QUERY END QUERY PROPERTY PENTAMATION----------------------------------------------------------- 01/02/02 PARCEL ID 280 035 GEO ID 18882 LOT/BLOCK 13 DBA PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER MOODY 10 KENT ROAD HARRIET BUONO BARNSTABLE 13 DEERHILL DRIVE HO-HO-KUS NJ 07423 PHONE DISTRICT BA DEVELOPMENT STATUS C ASSESSOR'S CODE CAPACITY(NOTES) ZONING DIST/ZOC RF-1 SEWER SYSTEM FLOOD PLN/ELEV. WATER SYSTEM OKH? Y # BEDROOMS ZBA DECISION FAMILY APT LOT SIZE 27442 .8 OPER/MGR NAME WET LANDS MULT ADDRESS USE 101 PROTECT DIST AP (N)EXT / (P)REVIOUS / NO(T)ES / PER(M) ITS / (V) IOLATIONS / (G) EOBASE / (E)XIT NO MATCHING RECORDS FOUND V riz � 4/ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Land Court Department of the Trial Court Miscellaneous Case No. 246863 JOSEPH F. DUGAS & another,' Plaintiffs vs. GENE BURMAN2 & others,' Defendants DECISION ALJ1-1O WING PLAINT IFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF REMAND Plaintiffs appeal, under G. L. c. 40A, § 17, the decision of defendant members of the Barnstable zoning board of appeals(board)to uphold the Barnstable building commissioner's refusal of plaintiffs' request that the building inspector revoke a building permit issued for the construction of a single family residence on certain land located at 36 Sunset Lane, in Barnstable (locus). Plaintiffs filed their unverified complaint on March 26, 1998. Following the answer of defendants Richard Rudders and Joan Rudders(Rudders),'filed on April 21, 1998,plaintiffs moved for summary judgment. The Rudders and the board both filed oppositions to the motion. A hearing was held on the motion on October 27, 1998, at which all parties appeared. 'Edith W. Dugas 'As he is a member of the Barnstable zoning board of appeals 'Gail Nightingale, Elizabeth Nilsson, David Rice, Emmett Glynn, Richard Boy and Ron Jansson, as they are members of the Barnstable zoning board of appeals; and Richard Rudders and Joan Rudders 'The board is not required to file and answer. G. L. c. 40A, § 17. 1 The record for purposes of summary judgment includes the following materials: (i)affidavit of plaintiff Joseph Dugas, dated June 4, 1998, with exhibits; (ii) attested copy of letter of Ralph Crossen,Barnstable building commissioner(commissioner),to plaintiffs' counsel,dated January 6, 1998; (iii) copy of the board's decision dated March 17, 1998, and filed with the town clerk on March 18, 1998, in appeal number 1998-37; (iv) attested copy of the payment records of the Barnstable tax collector regarding real property tax payments made for the account of locus during tax year 1997; (v)attested copies of the building permit application, dated September 19, 1997,by the Rudders, and building permit, dated November 14, 1997, issued by the commissioner to the Rudders, for demolition of an existing residence and construction of a new residence on locus; (vi) attested copy of the record maintained by the Barnstable assessor's office of the real property taxes assessed against locus; (vii) attested copy of a portion of the Barnstable zoning map, showing the portion of the town in which locus is situate; (viii)attested copy of the Barnstable zoning ordinance as amended through April 16, 1998 (by-law)and of various amendments thereto; (ix)attested copy of plot plan of locus, dated September 19,.1997, and drawn by Sweetser Engineering; (x) affidavit of Arthur Traczyk, Barnstable principal planner, dated October 16, 1998; and (xi) affidavit of plaintiff Joseph Dugas, dated October 26, 1998, with exhibits. The following facts are not in dispute. 1. Plaintiffs own and reside at property located at 30 Sunset Road, in Barnstable. Plaintiffs' property abuts locus to the south. 2. The Rudders,own locus. Prior to the events which have given rise to this action,locus was improved by a one-story single family residential dwelling(former dwelling). Locus is located in an RB zoning district,which requires a minimum lot size of 43,560 square feet. Locus contains 2 only 10,000 square feet and, consequently, is nonconforming in that respect. However, locus complied with the applicable lot size requirements when the former dwelling was constructed. As situated on locus,the former dwelling complied with the applicable setback and other dimensional requirements (other than minimum lot area) in effect under the current by-law. 3. On or about September 19, 1997, the Rudders applied to the commissioner for a permit to demolish the former dwelling and to construct a new, two-story, dwelling on locus (new dwelling). As proposed, the new dwelling would comply with applicable setback and other dimensional requirements(other than minimum lot area). Plaintiffs assert that the new dwelling will occupy a different footprint from that of the former dwelling,but I am unable to.determine the extent of the difference from the materials in the record. 4. The commissioner issued the requested building permit on or about November 14, 1997, and construction commenced shortly thereafter. 5. By letter dated December 30, 1997,plaintiffs' counsel made a written request to the commissioner for enforcement under G. L. c. 40A, § 7.5 Following the commissioner's denial of their enforcement request, plaintiffs appealed the denial to the board. 6. Following a hearing held on March 4, 1998, the board voted to uphold the commissioner's decision. i ne board filed a written decision, dated March 17, 1998, with the Barnstable town clerk on March 18, 1998. As reasons for its decision, the board referred to its findings of fact, which included the following: 5The Rudders assert in their opposition that plaintiffs previously had requested the building inspector to issue a stop work order, and the building inspector had complied with such request. However, the record does not establish their assertion, and the matter is not germane to this order. 3 116. Under the [by-law], section 4-4.2 (1) Nonconforming Lots - Separate Lot Exemption -this lot qualifies as a legal nonconforming lot. 7. The building is a legal building. It is conforming and meets all the setbacks of the [by-law]. It is not a nonconforming building. 8. The [commissioner] in his letter of January 06, 1998 (which the applicants are appealing) states `your contention about the Building Code is factually wrong as stated, therefore I see no reason to go any further with it. Finally, an as built, as submitted, is what the Town customarily accepts. We see no problem with this one.' 9. The demolition of an other wise [sic] conforming building on a nonconforming lot does not cause the lot to loose [sic] its nonconforming status." 7. Section 4-4.2 (1) of the by-law provides: "Any increase in area, frontage, width, yard or depth requirement of the [by-law] shall not apply to a lot for single or two-family residential use which at the time of recording or endorsement: A) was not held in common ownership with any adjoining land; and B) had a minimum of 5,000 sq. ft. of area and 50 feet of frontage or the minimum requirement for the zoning district in which it is located; and C) conformed to the existing zoning if any when legally created; and D) was separately owned at the time of every zoning change which made it nonconforming." 8. Section 4-4.3 of the by-law provides: "A pre-existing nonconforming building or structure that is used as a single or two family residence may be physically altered or expanded only as follows: 1) As of Right: If the [commissioner] finds that: A. The proposed physical alteration or expansion does not in any way encroach into the setbacks in effect at the time of construction,provided that 4 encroachments into a 10-foot rear or side yard setback and 20-foot front yard setback shall be deemed to create an intensification requiring a special permit under Section 4-4.3(2); and B. The proposed alteration or expansion conforms to the current height limitations of the [by-law]. 2) By Special Permit: If the proposed alteration or expansion cannot satisfy the criteria established in Section 4-4.3(1) above, the [board] may allow the expansion by special permit provided that the proposed alteration or expansion will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing building or structure." 9. Section 4-4.6 of the by-law provides: "1) The re-establishment of a lawful pre-existing nonconforming use and/or building or structure which has been destroyed or damaged by fire, acts of nature or other catastrophe, shall be permitted as of right, provided the building commissioner has determined that all the following conditions are met: A)The reconstruction or repair will not increase the gross floor area or height of the building or structure beyond that which previously existed, nor increase the footprint of the structure; B) If the building's location on the lot is to be changed, it will change in a manner that will result in a greater compliance with the bulk regulations established in the zoning district in which it is located; and C) The reconstruction or repair will not constitute an expansion or intensification of any nonconforming use. D) In the case of any use in which it would otherwise be required, the site plan review process has been followed. 2) The pre-existing nonconforming use and/or structure or building shall be discontinued unless a building permit has been applied for within 2 years from the date of damage or destruction, and construction is continuously pursued to completion." 10. Section 4-4.8 of the by-law provides: "Any lawful pre-existing nonconforming use or building or structure or use of land 5 which has been (i) abandoned or(ii) not used for 3 years, shall not thereafter be re- established. This section shall not apply in cases of damage or destruction governed by section 4-4.6." Summary judgment is appropriate in the instant case because there are no genuine issues of any material facts which would preclude disposition as a matter of law. Community Nat'l Bank v. Dawes, 369 Mass. 550, 553-556 (1976); Mass. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Before addressing the merits of the parties' arguments,I must address defendants' challenge to plaintiffs' standing. Defendants contend that plaintiffs have failed to present evidence to substantiate that they are "persons aggrieved." Plaintiffs are abutters to locus, and as such are entitled to the presumption that they are "persons aggrieved" within the meaning of G. L. c. 40A, § 17. Watros v. Greater Lynn Mental Health and Retardation Association,Inc.,421 Mass. 106, 111 (1995). "The presumption recedes when a defendant challenges a plaintiff's status as an aggrieved person and offers evidence supportin.4 his or her challenge." Id. Once the presumption is so challenged,the burden shifts to the plaintiffs to demonstrate that they are aggrieved,without benefit of the presumption. Defendants have produced no evidence to show that plaintiffs would suffer no injury to a cognizable legal interest as a result of the proposed construction. Accordingly,plaintiffs are entitled to rely on their statutory presumption,and bear no burden to produce evidence to support their standing. Defendants also challenge this court's jurisdiction to hear plaintiffs' appeal, on the ground that plaintiffs' action began with a request for enforcement under G. L. c. 40A, § 7.' However, 'Section 7 confers jurisdiction on the superior court to "enforce the provisions of this chapter" [G. L. c. 40A]. 6 plaintiffs' appeal is here under G.L. c.40A, § 17,pursuant to which this court's jurisdiction is clear. Defendants claim that the commissioner properly issued the building permit,because the new dwelling meets all applicable setback requirements and, accordingly, is not nonc onforming. . According to defendants,it is the lot,rather than the stricture,that is nonconforming, and the lot is "grandfathered'.'.pursuant to the provisions of G. L. c. 40A, § 6,¶4, and section 4-4.2 (1) of the by- law. Defendants' claim is inconsistent with the holding in Dial Away Co.,Inc.v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Auburn,41 Mass.App. Ct. 165,.fiurther appellate review denied 423 Mass. 1111 (1996). See also Willard v. Board of Appeals of Orleans, 25 Mass. App. Ct. 15 (1987). Dial Awav makes clear that improved lots are governed by the provisions of G. L. c. 40A, § 6, ¶ 1. Accordingly, an otherwise conforming structure on a nonconforming lot is treated as a nonconforming structure. See also Holmes v. Doelger, 3 LCR 158, 159, miscellaneous case no. 212113 (August 18, 1995) (Scheier,J.). The board's decision is based on a legally incorrect premise,and is therefore annulled. This matter is remanded to the board for further proceedings consistent with this decision. In anticipation of the board's consideration of this matter on remand, I offer the following guidance on certain issues argued by the parties in this appeal. First,the new dwelling may be allowed if the new dwelling is a"reconstruction" as that term is used in the "second except" clause of the first sentence of G. L. c. 40A, § 6, ¶ L' Dial Away 'The first paragraph of§ 6 is "Except as hereinafter provided, a zoning ordinance or by-law shall not apply to structures or uses lawfully in existence or lawfully begun, or to a building or special permit issued before the first publication of notice of the public hearing on such ordinance or by-law required by section five, but shall apply to any change or substantial extension of such use, to a building or special permit issued after the first notice of said public hearing,to any reconstruction, extension or structural 7 expressly recognizes that the"second except"clause allows reconstruction of nonconforming single- or two-family residential structures,despite more limited provisions for reconstruction under a local by-law. Dial Awav, 41 Mass. App. Ct. at 170- 171. For purposes of determining whether the new dwelling is a permissible reconstruction within the meaning of the "second except" clause, Dial Away further suggests that it does not matter that the Rudders voluntarily demolished the former dwelling. Angus v. Miller, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 470 (1977), and Martin v. Board of Appeals of Yarmouth,20 Mass.App. Ct. 972,further appellate review denied 396 Mass. 1102 (1985),cited by plaintiffs, both involved nonconforming commercial structures, to which the provisions of the "second except" clause do not apply. See Dykens v. Board of Appeals of Quincy, land court miscellaneous no. 238329 (December 15, 1998) (Kilborn, C.J.).' Second, unlike the circumstances of Dial Away, the Rudders did not abandon the former dwelling simply by demolishing it. Abandonment is a question of intent. The Rudders demolished the former dwelling for the purpose and with the intent of constructing the new dwelling in replacement thereof. Such circumstances do not evidence an intent to abandon. Compare Dial change of such structure and to any alteration of a structure begun after the first notice of said public hearing to provide for its use for a substantially different purpose or for the same pm-pose in a substantially different manner or to a substantially greater extent except where alteration, reconstruction extension or structural change to a single or two-family residential structure does not increase the nonconforming nature of said structure." The "second except" clause is the last clause of the sentence, providing special protections for single or two-family residential structures. 'Plaintiffs suggest that a contrary result was reached in Siepel v. Board of Appeals of Eastham, 2 LCR 151, miscellaneous case no. 177558 (October 17, 1994) (Scheier, J.). That case was decided before Dial Away and, in any event, resulted in a remand to the board for a Goldhirsh determination in a manner similar to the remand under this order. 8 Awav, 41 Mass. App. Ct. at 171 - 172 (rebuilding did not occur until twenty-three years following demolition). See generally Derby Ref. Co. v: Chelsea, 407 Mass. 703 (1990). Third,the proposed new dwelling is not within the commissioner's approval authority under the provisions of section 4-4.3 (1)of the by-law. That section speaks to "extensions and alterations" but not to reconstructions. The proposed new dwelling, if it may be authorized at all, is not an extension or alteration,but is instead a reconstruction. See Dial Away, 41 Mass. App. Ct. at 168 - 169; Planning Bd. of Reading v. Board of Appeals of Reading, 333 Mass. 657, 661 (1956). Accordingly, the proposed reconstruction may be allowed only if the board finds that (i) the proposed new dwelling does not intensify the nonconformity, or (ii) (if it does intensify the nonconformity) the proposed new dwelling would not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the former dwelling. See Goldhirsh v. McNear, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 455, 460 - 461 (1992). See also Holmes v. Doelger, 3 LCR 158, 159,miscellaneous case no.212113 (August 18, 1995) (Scheier, J.). Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is allowed, and the decision of the board is annulled. This matter is remanded to the board for further proceedings consistent with this decision. This court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for any necessary review of the board's further action. So ordered. Mark V. Green J tice Dated: January 22, 1999 9 01/09/2002 12:15 FAX 6174220962 Duckham+McDougal Archs Z 007 ✓(.� 4 J. Y ewp •�i _ - r.�--ems'_"`.:��•r— _ - `-'- ^•.,•`_ -. _I �� f-_ •�,,:tie�_�:�_ _'_'�_ >xi{-,gym + 6-,'p`>E.fl� �� e-'�. —"T' _ •;� 1 '� c'u -" y- �-_.- t '�� 0 •Y spy � ,.- a TCw,>-•' 8 hh ,,(('' j��j �•'l,I "17-``�S t [- � �_.' �t f..�Tta �,`� U�J�UYfI. •3•. . c r 0 ry 0 0 ro r ' ry �t4 . � e 19 1! o '°oae r,ae i� © � 1 1 soon � _..T"'- ..✓_ l � J"'�"_�-� �_ i� ,� �® YS Uenty v.fe e h \s/ / aiy�g„_',• t 4,r'l \ \`\ \ 'too• �'`� ^, // � � 9�• � /re I 1 �''• ! d •/' pa9° xis uwha. an a�Irb `' d �. wa 10 1 A—d i _ ., 12 / Sri ' / u P.wYon 11 h d.uynafed u Na / \ Boas F1eod peoatfon/w fA. . pJ IBp Yeor Ravd Zane Oy FE A .'( �• ... ev 1Z' Il D o t��M 0 r 0 cc ro 0 0 ro ro r ro ,yys] 0 r ,P ro ro 0 m as ro I � C .--------- -------- - - ---- -•--- ------------- x C --------- ------ ------- n d ---- -- ------- ------------------ ---------------- O -------- ------ ---- �C � ;ty----- ----- IN EM aD lug DIM MSM ----- 0 i•9•oZ-- N EA�tf�,�,rAr•t'ta wJ CD r 0 co ro 0 0 ro r ro W r N ro ro 0 cc CO I _ w 1.4 C7 f{gTd�--------T'— -- --------- i------'-- — -- --- --------- i. - .. \ n — ------------ O e. — ------------------------- -- oa m i ---- — MREEEEI— WIN ® ---- _ --- - -- 0 1 •�•OZ w O r O O N O O N r N f,. W O r a N N 0 m 0 N C7 C ______ _ A -------- --- -------- -------- x - - -- ------- -------- ORO C7 O W-- ----- ------ ---------- ------ ------------------------ --------- ------ �C TI,{�-- --- rw• , - - a . — -- --- -- -- --- 0 0 �llat�Sp �� {.�t•OZ war�✓��'►� 0 r o cc ro 0 0 ro r ro r 17 Y ye a� r a ro ro 0 m a� n� C7 C n t-e Uri - T i------------ .}. tit t � M�5911FV NEU ILL] , lHJ SC A C7 O C �_�� r ✓'' ff x' r crv/,vss` act rvoaas / o ! ' O Vas T /-A_-O G O ` 7 oJ� l c aBacg sro�✓E gatzoe,� , t V7 : n� ;EEEC'` y r ' r �•/ AA y sE Bey ,ao$--.a s.lv ,� z 2 y R �. „ Y C"m IRON F6Naa x i s n HYA e.t G e<, 1ni A,c,k �o sE-OP-SHdRow M�J / t •z � Cy °a } V oa i8 1 GhwN / t'2, ALwA.v zAN C.!{ZZP_y r-4..&Ar ? E 1 ��. f' '/ •� { SNoeBRos.� BoeDPCaG.?rn f �•P t >�Q.. lip � I o kLR.lT RbArb 4(1 0 0 rn IE 5aei kc #"7�r 'ham. a z .wk17 �'N�eYcr - r ` _ yn NO NJ� ':'�, AMP a, r C •., �� mac' ��•,.+,°��'�`a�-�`a�""'` ."�F _ �� �°�i F '� F�}5y��p 11"'Telrt� ,„�a�9pS�Y. y fik p71r�h, r. 7'_ 31 5� ,�r �44444 t4 �j� �• � ��- i 1 ��f Itu t6x ��a � � R7� n�:� � t'Y �"tk �.� �� 9i�'•`r ri b'i dr' ,a raft T� 11,21 TNR r - x_ mac,, .��x �+,✓�' N���-~_� a�""fr' � �s¢S'`��_ A ��� x� r 4'�y��«a- '�^^ ems".4,�- s. ' 4"'r• m a ...r,� ^�`- k�"•5 `- ..yes," - �d.s. ...' '���e �..�-' .� �� � is �>•,., ���� _ r 1-14 lit it a � r a , f i _ a •d t -2 yt� 11/22/02 10 Kent Lane, Barnstable44,`,, _ Nii P' .�r-� ` ' "' if ,. �`� ,��"�'�}"'�"{�a"� �'h may,',��. �.. �+.^«. _e.w,t �'.r. 3.'�,w ✓y" ti:'.,� - - t�Y �.' e " .`rc �c�►.X�s.s.���".},}S�"� .i �� t,fit'i✓*7� ��e. ,:,4 'Y s:Y.� R u..,n•�Ls� 'i� ys+'F 'ry�v �- ; :+ gSa.��: ,y+a`r�' +"rar�+q k'�" ��y^'"a��a r""W.� #", �+'i � � "'' t' � otyy. `fir--•� -af, y ..-�` sxr+wX =�'g: rh[. �,ry .." a;.n t'�N. +�.�.,'� i `a7 ' t 'G #`^ '""`'�x �..�. �"+wS. IS jw s �. 1► er�y: �a x ;per a �'�, �`w � !�" � Zo zti .s• ,� {g y4,;`. "' + .+ �'t`v', "' w;"yea' ".'y *4 +w krr t ;l = ,t*c 1! �n^F W,�/ ,ky, �..,'wii C g r 4` � '- '"'•-„r ^'^ �J4. •„y;,w� 1 !�'�" y,'�w .� �' �/°i z '� S!� q, J '- � �i' �Q sae '� , p �► �_F, L .. � � � �{.�" 'FRS.; `$" r 4 11/22/02 10 Kent Lane, Barnstable t. �,� .,w--s v� ��� s _. ""•i°0'o'.'�"wi �1'=.°r.'r "'y�v'"�''rc ,a .as+i ,.:"•,`r"� +";fit-„ • ,u;:.�-sw �, yK� -. �s. g"" ,� tr ,:�.3'.`'�'�'' ,'"��ti �` �x�.!�•,w,. n;� "'1�"s,xa-' 4 : x, ti..: �" r ^..s+�-ii�`..a t ". •*,. �" _ �' !r`+" ,r - 1" u�+ , w. na ti!. r+.x. "+� _, —. w, :'h �' •c -,w.,,a''C"�w..'�}- .�3+ ?ny,�,.� °r,�•�CC �9 t "� 'I t •�c`'.,, y�n,,. , ,� 4 . .,i"' ,•. '�a e;; ` "!,: ,�.� . 9.`3 ti,aj¢�*+.. s� -'°$dui' 'Sr:°�r M1,y. .-s 3;t „�..ce�«' ' F.:"Two`'"^° '•'+�ra' -z. > '� •# { .,; ^a+d.Spry,*�? Z` '' '":� „,;�°m. .y, ` '.3-i �,w.. ,, �.�x' •W a x* � � e..yarc v"�`, •p a '��r'^r �'`+4.. �..w ���'w.•� � �w, yt�����'��+w"+w' *.«.�°� vY'�r+"'�� ,.,er Cr .�� - 'r ;, 3i,.»+rc —�-..��.'�++.a�`,� ia-v'w �a ^^+w+..,�'�,'.,�^' fi.�l.`vi�i,. '"Y'�x€ ,` � �• gX �' r--.. "� 'S1k.., � ���" .^ �+,. .jai• ,�,_� '1,�+ ,• ,,," °s.. � "'�'}.- -.r. " :s �'a""` t. �.yc K` a ,•,'``t Sj i"jy�i. `tea 4 r 11/22/02 10 Kent Lane, Barnstable +r 1 ID 1 ?-mfieldi -81+ mfield BI tUM�14 r lUa�.Itt ' °BAlmfield Blmfi¢Idt _ •t~J, -t � .yf^✓ _�y�•'���.4,.��. r�,Y�4...;y•F+� -V�r'.#�y � � • �- � aR i ����� � Kv $ �° _ '..�++Y- "9w/ '. ,� S�,,�::T... .:• emu` f � y,,. ry, �t ....ii.r' s.�.a'n .► "�'$-.:k .N�:'^wor , ` 4""'�'Y .a - '-'°i^`"n""+ ;•",pryvF - ',�Lt.""a .k"'�°7'y" .:C `'♦ , ` +tL t �rf.'{.i* • -xa ` ��� • �I��'!M, �,.*f�A,..,�. au a.� . Sw-i .e�' •4.' e`.wµ+, � �..i y,,,,t�"L¢'�, �� .�kx � IWO "s # r . � • �jo,�}� C" V4 . �.a�, ,,t a4a#�.� � �#F}t ;,ydb}'l.•': 4 � 4a + s f,��w - �` '�a. a• :, {his �� 11/22/02 10 Kent Lane, Barnstable -` l e , � f I a, Blmfield Meld Aa6CR _ r+ ::.ri�,c.d»..�w�.p..•.""+V'^''= "�` ,,,,3 =yam•�, 'O�� �+L '�, - +-s • s :r. ��'.. Ate- ����,r�F� � �.'� .. L d r ter. .# 'r. � y�,�a'"'• � .,yR+�. Y• s i j I i I UUN B R ' ID I ENN.-A BARNSTABLE , MASSACHUSETTS 02630 PERMIT SETJULY 17., 2002 ; J L i I GENERAL NOTES PROJECT DIRECTORY DRAWING INDEX I 1. ALL WORK PERFORMED,INCLUDING MATERIALS FUR►BAfA WORKMANSHIP.AND MEANS 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY ADEQUATE NUMBER OF SKILLED WORKMEN WHO ARE OWNER: Harriet Buono i NO METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION SHAH CONFORM TO THE APPIIIGAB E AND THE THOROUGHLY TRAINED AND EXPERIENCED N THE NECESSARY CRAFTS AND WHO ARE LATEST REQUIREMENTS OF THE MASSACHUESTIS STATE BUILDING ALL g�1LA FOR Y FAMILIAR THE REALR WORK�THE PERFORMED BY Y T (Sos) 352-5190 5101 FOUNDATION PLAN ANY FIRE DEPARTMENT REDlMT10NS,UTILITY COMPMIY iEOURELIETNiS AND GENERAL LICENSED PROFESSIONALS AD AS REQUIRED BY STATE AND LOCAL OaVEANMEMTS FOR CONDITIONS PER AN DOCUMENT/A2D6 AND OWNER/CONIRAM:fOR EACH APPLICABLE TRADE LLMBM ELECTRICAL.ETC).WHO STALL ARRANGE FOR CONDITONS PEaMpD DOCJAIUMENT S. AND WTAIN REwllaa AM SIGN ARCHITECT. Duckhom + McDougal Architects 5102 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN 10. THESE DRAWINGS ARE DIVIDED INTO SEC IONS FOR CONVENIENCE .ENCE ONLY.CONTRACT 374 Congtees street 5103 SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN 2. BEFORE COMMENCING WIORK.THE CONTRACTOR SNAIL ME ALL REQUIRED CERTIFICATES Suite 804 OF INSURANCE WITH THE OWNER AID THE DEPARTMENT OF BUIDBOs. Vrt AND MATERIAL,SUPPLIERSro ALL RELEVANT 5104 ROOF FRAMINGSUPPLIERS SHALL REFER "PLAN OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS.AND PAY ALL FEES REOUIRED O THE GOVERNING AGEP CµS SECT1O15 IN BDDNS AND PERFORMING THEIR WORK AND SHALL BE RESPONDBLE FOR Boston. MA 02210 I ALL ASPECTS OF THEIR WORK REGARDLESS OF WHERE THE INFORMATION OCCURS ON THE T (6t 422-0952 5105 FOUNDATION DETAILS ' DRAWINGS F 61 422-0962 S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL L VINT•THE SITE AND VERIFY TWIT ALL E ISLNG CONDITIONS C Kent DucWwm . AGREE HATTER INFORMATION SHOOWN oN iFE DRNAWOiGS ANY CONFU TS.OMISSIONS OR 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE ro COORDINATE WORK OF ALL TRADES AND SHALL. L DISCFEPANGES SHALL BE tiROUIGHT ro TIE AtTENIDN OF THE ARCHITECT FOR PROVIDE ALL DIMENSIONS REQUIRED FOR OTHER TRADES SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESOLUTION PRIOR TO CDMMMEfNCO,mNr OF NNY WORIL NO-ALLOWANCES WTLL RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDNKIION OF THEIR Waal WRH THE WORK OF mHETM AND D100 FOUNDATION DEMOLITION PLAN SUBSEQUENTLY BE MADE ON.HIS[REHAIi FOR ANY PL DNAL OtPElI5E4 WHICH ARE SHALL VERITY THAT ANY WORN RELATING TO THEN WHICH MUST BE PROVIDED BY MORS, STRUCTURAL: SReQeH Aeexlote/ INCURRED DUE 10 NtILECT OR WHDFi CARD HAVE:BFEH REASONABLY FORESED/ HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND Is ADEQUATE PRIOR ro COMMENCING THEIR WORK 63j Commonwealth Avenue �D701 FIRST FLOOR OEM011T10N PLAN . BY PRIOR INSPECTION a=IXISTIHO COIaI10HS Newton. MA 02459 D102 SECOND FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN - 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE STRUCTURAL.BACKNG/BLOCIINL FOR ALL WALL MOUNTED A PRIOR TO COMMENCING WOW,ORDERING OF M ITIMALS AND SHOP FABRICATION OF Arc FI TURES.FITMES AND EQUIPMENT,AND FOR ALL HANGING FIXTURES,BINDS,ETC. T (11 244l 2 A101 FIRST FLOOR PLAN W7ERIM-S,DE CONIRACFOR 51VLL vERFY ALL DaE16laN5 AS HNdCh7ED ON 7!E FON(T61 244-1732 DRAWINGS AND SHALL REPORT ANY ANCIR ro THE ARCITECT FOR to CONTRACTOR SHALL I6TALL ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AS PER MANUFACTURERS C Steve Siegel A102 SECOND FLOOR PLAN WRITTEN mmucTIOLS AEI/OR REUOIMEHMTIONLS RE.GLunoN. A103 ROOF PLAN S MAW&=IDDATE LOCATIpK DIIEN9a6,REFERENCE,AND TYPICAL DUAL FOR 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES DURING THE COARSE OF THE CONTRACT KEEP THE SullivanEn Ineertn . Inc. A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COIISTRUCTON. MLMDR oETALS NOT USUALLY SHOWN OR SPECSIED.BUT NECESSARY ADJOINING PREMISES,INCLUDING STREETS AND OTHER AREAS ASSIGNED T0.OR USED ClV/L/SITE SURVEY- 9 9 FOR PROPER CONSIC49.F NNY PARE aF THE r10RK SMALL�INCLUDED A5� BY THE CONTRACTOR FREE FROM ACCUMULATIONS OF WASTE MATERIALS AM RUBBISH P.O. Box 659 A202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS THEY WERE IDICATED N THE DRAWWM FOR CONDITIONS HOT ILLUSTRATED.NOTIFY CAUSED Bf CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES,SUBCONTRACTORS OR THEIR WORK. Ostervilla MA 02655 ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION AHD/OR WLAR DETAIL toCONTRACTORSHALL s1 ASSIST WITH DELIVERY AND STORAGE OF OWNER SUPPLIED ITEMS, r ((506 426-3sa4 A203 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 6 THE SCOPE OF WOW INCLUDES ALTERATION ro EXISTING,FACILITIES. WORK WHICH. AND D OF ANY ROUL.TTNG TRk%L CONT� Peter 3Sulllwn A301 BUILDING SECTIONS . GgOBVIOUSLY REQUIRED ro BE PERFORMED ro PROVDE A COMPLETE AND FINISHED A302 BUILDING SECTIONS PRODUCT LWTHHN 7TE.COPE OF WDRK BUT WHICH IS NOT SPECFICMLY INCLUDED ON 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PRO'ADE SOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL TRADES PRIOR ro A303 BUILDING SECTIONS , THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS,SHALL BE PERFORMED By THE CONTRACTOR AND BE NSTAUATIOK AND SAMPLES OF ALL MATERIAL NO COLOR/FINHS93 FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT strata Design Associates. incorporated i INCLUDED N THE W.CGT mRLCTGR ro INSPECT AT TIME OF DELIVERY ALL FIXTURES AItpLTECTS APPROVAL.CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ARCHITECTS APPROVAL.ON ANY 151 Pearl Street A401 EXTERIOR BUILDING DETAILS PROVIDED BY DrNER ro INSURE PROPER aUNNTTY.TINT ITEMS ARE DEFECT FREE. DEVIAtTON/SU[i57TtTON FROM CONRtACT DOCUMENTS. AND WCI T MMM CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION,WHICH WY Boston, MA 02110 A402 EXTERIOR BUILDING DETAILS INCLUDE BLOCKING,SHLNNG,ETC. R 6 THE CONTRACfaYS 17. CONTRACTOR ro VERIFY ALL FIXTURE COUNTS.AS APPLICABLE TO TEEM CONTRACT. T (817• 956-9955 (� RFSPOt�LRY TO ID�HONAIE ALL TENS APPLED BY ow ft VEOORS AND ro � WITH OWNER. F Ft(fst s56-0542 VERFY THAT ALL WIERIALS RECEIVED ARE N ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPEC,HEiFJN. 1& CONTRACTOR SHRAl1 BE RESPONSIBLE FOR C.OSEOIIT.PRIOR ro FINAL PAYMENT. . ' ANY DAMAGED ITEMS OR DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN MATERIALS SPECIFIED AND CO Jim Heroux MATERIALS SHIPPED,SHALL BE RFPCIM TO THE ARCHITECT PROMPTLY. INCORPORATING ALL STANDARD GILARANTFES AND WARAANEES AND ORIGINALS OF ALL ' APPLICABLE CERTIFICATES OF TERM NSPDCTON.TEMPORARY FINAL CERTIFICATE OF - OCCUPANCY.COORDINATE WITH OWNER. CONTRACTOR: Steven J. Bishopric. Inc. f* 7. THE tbNiOAC10R SHALL BE RESP MATERIALS AM FDR THE WITHIN THl OF ALL 1112 Main Street. Units 17-19 INSTALLATIONS,AREA A D WADJOINI AD FINISHES WTHIN THE PROPOSED 1B. CONTRACTOR AWL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A IVER DATE ALLPROFESSIONALED COENANT OF CONSTRUCTION AREA AND ALL ADJOINING PROPERTY AFFECID BY CONTRACtOR S THE ENURE FACLTY PRIOR TO OTHER TNCEOER DATE ALL EXPOSED HORIZONTAL Ostervilb, MA 02655 OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHORING AND BRACING FOR AND VERTICAL SURFACES INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING MUST BE Tr 420—= ALL STRUCTURAL OR REMOVAL TASKS. THE CONTRACTOR SNAIL WIVE SOLE WIPED CLEAN AND FREE OF DUST:WALLS.EXPOSED STRUCTURAL ME)BEI.STAR. F A 42N3—SEAR A701 FIRST FLOOR ELECTRICAL AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN RESPOSIB�ILM FOR ANY DAMAGE OR NJURFS CAUSED BY OR DURING THE EXECUTION AND RAUN(NS.C48NEM ALL FLOOR.MUST BE MOPPED CLEAN. CO :Steven Bishopric of THE T ANY EXISTING MATERIALS AND FaWsiES WHICH ARE DAMAGED,SHALL eopri A702 SECOND FLOOR ELECTRICAL AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN BE REPLACED As NECESSARY WITH NEW WTCHIJG W7E7aALS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S 20. CONTRACTOR ro PROVDE 3 COPES OF AS ENLT NFORMATDN,OPERATION NO + OWN COST AND EXPENSE. MAINTENANCE MANIAS,INCLUDING ALL PRODUCT GUARANIES AND WARRANTIES. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 00 ALL CFRTIIG.CJMSIIIC CORE DRILLING,PATCHING AND . REPAIRING AS REQUIRED 10 CUM OF THE WOW TWIT MAY BE INDICATED ON HCE HIGS A LL WWTERB IEI LS DSro CO E — MNL ADJACENT SYSTM. JOB. . OTHERWISE NOTED. SMOKE DETECTORS 0.K. BARNSTA LE UIL/DING DEPT. �'s 2�� Hunec Daft BE PERFORMED 1 DRAWINGIMMEMS P D OF THE WOW.AND SHAUL NOTIFY AROTIECIE EN�IURAL DOWYDNIA 2 CTOR SMALL CAREFULLY VERIFY ALL DIMIMIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOM ON 1. ��CIr�A�AREQUIREE►�MENTSS FOR YN�TH EI ����� 1 7 17 SET WAIF$INTERIOR 9aBS-ODE AND DINER CONCRETE NOT 07 SPECIFIED- i Z. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MEANS AND METHODS OF TEMPORARY SHORING. 3000 PSI. EXTERIOR SUBS E70'06ED TO WEATHER-4000 PSI. TOP OF%WILL . BRACNM OR 07HMWISE PROTECTING ANY PORTION OF THE SIRUCAME,SFFE AND UWRES S SLUMP AT THE PONT OF DNSCNAROE FROM THE READY-MIX TRUCK SHALL BE 3-b� FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER B SPECIFYING TINE FINISHED 4. REINF'ORCNG SiE71: TWICAL-AS711 A875,GRADE NR EL- "17 i I CONDRION ONLY,WIiH10lR ASSIR,IING KNOWLEDGE NOR RESPONSIBILITY FOR HOW TE WELDED WIRE FABRIC- ASTM 161 - CON7RAC70R WILL ACHIEVE THIS RESULT. S NON-SHRINK GROUT SHALL BE-EMBI=16Y BY WASTER B1fUDER;�'SON06ROVY BY I 3. FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF FLOOR AND ROOT OPENINGS.POSTS,ETC.,SEE MCHITIO IRAI soDEBOHaN BUILDING PRODUCTS 'FIVE STAR tatQ1T'BY U.W&T CORPORAn01L OR � ; i DRAWINGS. EQUAL AS APPROVED BY THE OYrfNER B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A CONCRETE MO DESIGN TO THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL ATFOLPIDA71 LEAST TWO 1 TO THE FIRST PLACEMENT, 7. liSECT10N AND�TWING OF CAST-WPLACE CONICEM WORK WILL BE PERFORMED BY AN 1. EXCAVATE TO LINES AND GRADES REWIRED TO PROPERLY INSTALL THE FOUNDATIONS ON INDEPENDENT TESTING AGENCY,UNDER A SEPARATE CONTRACT mm THE OWNER. IF NORGGNNOp�f• UNDb'TI1RBm SOIL OR CONTROLLED STRUCTURAL BACKFU AS REQUIRED BY THE CONCRETE FAILS.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMPTLY REPLACE CONCRETE MATERIALS OR REDO ARQiTECT. ALL EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE DRY BMW PLACING ANY CONCRETE .WORK WHICH HAS BM RF.ECIED BY AR00=1 AID/OR TESTING AGENCY.AT NO DRPENCE Z. E aMM FWFNGS SHALL BE PLACED ON APPROVED SOIL AT A MUM M DEPTH OF 4 FEET, 70 THE 01WIEIL OR AS MODIFIED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENCINEIIb BELOW THE LOWEST ADJACENT GROUND 6 INSPECTION AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNER OR THEN REPRESENTATIVE SHALL N NO WAY , _ - EPO6ED 70 FREEZING ANY ADJUSTMENT OF FOOTING ELEVATIONS DUE TO FIELD CONWRONS RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THEN RESPONSIBILITY 70 PROVIDE QUALITY CONTROL.MATERIALS. MUST HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECT, AND WORKMANSHIP FULLY INSURING THAT THIS WORK WILL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT i S SOIL BEARING CAPACITY. FIDGINGS MUST BE PLACED ON SOL WITH A MINIMUM BEARING REQIIRDMD/TA _� '-� CAPACITY OF IOOO POTTIES PER SOME FOOT. B. SMNPLID AND TEST=ON QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE MAY b. St05 _ '-]^.,.. /qb. edoed I j 4. BAQffILL BELOW FOOTINGS AND SLABS SLNL BE MADE WITH APPROVED GRANULAR MATERIALS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWN06 AS DIRECTED BY THE ARCHfl . SAMPLES WILL BE MADE AT THE r PLACED N 6-LAYERS LAMM SH A L BE COMPACTED TO 96 POINT OF DSC14ARGE FROM THE READY-MIL TRUOL A SLUMP 70T COMPLYING WITH ASW " r MObIU1RE cON7ENT,As DEFIRm BY AslMM D1357.ME.T OD 0. a�3;ONE TEST FOR FJ1C11 SET OF LroMPREssIIN sTREwc7IN lESf SPECIMEN& ,S AIE CO►iPR6SON TEST SPECIMENS,COMPLYING WITH A57Y C31.ONE SET OF 4 STANDARD rr TOP OF(MALL CYLINDERS FOR EACH COMPRESSION STRENGTH TEST ONE SET OF CYLINDERS SHALL BE a lcim WHAVREMMEPLACE UNTIL THE FIRST FLDOR DECK 1.AS FRAMED TAKEN FROM THE FIRST FOOTING POUR. AND TWO SETS SHALL BE TAKEN WRING EL-_t'$ AND SHEATHED,UNLESS WRITTEN APPROVAL B GIVEN BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENONEEFL FOUNDATION WALL POURS.AT AN AL CHOSEN BY THE ARpfTECT. COMPRESSION %, L PROVE!FOUNDATION DRAINAGE WA�AM P-PROOWNR AID FUUFDATKN WALL- TIRENG H TESTIS SHALL COMPLY WITH AS7M C38C ONE SPECIMEN TESTED AT 7 DAYS,2 i r . INSULATION AS NDOATED ON THE DRAWINGS SIB TESTED AT 2B DAYS.AND 1 SPECIMEN RETAINED N RESERVE FOR LATER i TOP OF WALL i • r 1".171�� 7. PROVIDE METAL OR PVC SLEEVES IN THE FOUNDATION WALLS FOR SEWER GAS EIEMM AND 7ESTNG IF REQUIRED. IEL--0-2 VIC WATER LIHES,AS REWIRED. h. 54.7 1/7 d or LOW PONT OF SLAB TOP O WNL /, EL__ice HION PNNI OF SLAB f4'-Q EL--or2 f; 257 1/7 7-7 1/2' i'r EL=-0'-8 1115 TOP OF WALL I E4 1--11 3/r, EL--or2 1/4, 10 Y.O. MQ , ____—_ __ i TOP O IWI1! TOP lOP OF SHELF i c.•._ - •• _•.. .. ..•:., a SHELF � S1O5 r'EL-4-2 1/r r r___ ____________ __ ��Fl ____________ -------------- ____ _ AID' I tv -EL=-SLY+/- __`2 ', r .. CIR OLT FM r I TOP OF SHELF ;:..: .,..... _ c, rg J/N, 3 - P EL=4-tli+/- r--- ----------- ----------------'------ ------------- ------ -� _ 9Jgs TOP O WALL r i UCH F%EING J r 1�O WNL r _ EL TOP!lF HALL , 4 ' EL-, J.� TOP OF SHELF '/ EL=-1-J 3/4' r , 5105 CRAWL SPACE- i - = ILA m I f i r YID SUB ``� WnIC�FFx16m+c+- I E NM :• ,roP OF WALL I I 1�aa Eq it imam DasnHO ACCESS ro ---- ----- ✓Lp �'-% 9\� IR SPACE TOP OF DOMING WALL r _ FL--or10'+/- / ' 0 \ ACCESS TO CPL SPACE VERIFY IN V AW TTD - -+/ L ®' - ' 4 ldATCH EXISTING n / i L Sa , [.1.___F 'r, ' S105 tF 1S HEW 3 rOLALLY LSD NEW 3 ILAILY �, 'Y ��ON COUAIN ON i r 7-B t '611 7/6 TOP a EIOSISHG STAB 2`CONpiETE iOO�i PG = 2517 OEiP i �'Ly i UP ALIGN TO WALL CONCRETE FOOTING YIIBFY N READ J/.r f' 7 I ___ _ lOP OF WALL R SIDS ' 17 CRAWL SPACE- G I I - - - -- S1105it b 9g EL= 0 1V NUD SLAB 3' Y F3 I/TY 8'-8 1/B' S/g. U4Tgi IXSONG i i i 7 5/6 7*051T Vie- r�.'�'-::_,:- - _ ' ti ? I I Duckham+McDougal a-- I rg Architects 1/r --� ACCESSm YA sGee;s>mE®4 1 9 CIM SPACE 70P OF DOSG WALL - 02210 MM EL-4-11f+/ TOP OF WALL g Tdghme (617)422-0952 4. VERIFY N FEND VERIFY N FOLD b EL r , �. / I ' MATCH it (617 422-0W w , ' -------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- MN EDSTNG a ) � RtMa�1c • C� - 12 Sty �_ ^:i�la��', .. K' I _ Buano Residue fq 13 _ TIP W WALL ti Erg _ rlD�jgt 10KmLRoad stos Mir • s;.: m m , m 1 a=-1'33/t R1m 5105 mNS Mauadmift ?' ____�________________—_______ y fq •5\= 5105 vE1WY N FIELD - ------ -- -- - _ FOUNDATION PUMP ' ` $105 TOP OF WAIL -- - -- - -- =-1'3 VIC TOP O SHELF : EL--S-Y+/- V-1 5/6 lore 1/Y V t'-9 3/ VEIBFY IN FIEND VFRIHY N FEUI H.P AS NOTE 35dt E2ISTM FOIINOAmN B 7/; I 62 5/6- VERFY N FEUD 16'4 7/9' 8=IT 5/T Projad Nunbel, 6 3/6 01012 7or1 I/7 Date KILY 1 S101 iI Revrs;ora I ROUGH CARPENTRY Number Dote Description 1 1. ALL PLOUGH CARPENTRY WORK SHALL BE EXECUTED IN CONFORMANCE 10.FOR WOOD JOIST SPANS UP TO 14 FEET,PROVIDE A SINGLE ROW OF FULL W17H THE ANERICAN INSTTU7E.OF TIMBER CONSTRUCTION"TIMBER DEPTH BLOCKING BETWEEN JOISTS AT NIDSPAN.FOR SPANS EXCEEDING 14 FT_ ! � I ANDARDS•-AITC 100. PROVIDE TWO ROWS OF FULL DEPTH BLOCKING BETWEEN JOISTS AT THIRD CONSTRUCTION ST POINTS OF THE SPAN. , 2. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED.ALL WOOD BEANS,JOISTS,RAFTERS, 11.GABLE-END WALL STUDS IN CATHEDRAL,PARTIAL CATHEDRAL,OR HIGH HEADERS,STRINGERS.PLATES.AND SILLS SHALL BE SPRUCE PINE FIR aCEILING SPACES SHALL SPAN UNINTERRUPTED FROM'THE.FIOOR PLATE TO THE OR BETTER.WITH A MINIMUM Fb=875 PSI(SINGLE USE)AND Fb1000 PSI THE UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF RAFTERS THEY SHOULD NOT BE INTERRUPTED - { (REPETITIVE USE),AND E SHALL BE 1.400,000 PSI OR BETTER_ BY ANY HORIZONTAL PLATES OR BEANS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS I 3. MOOD STUDS MAY BE EASTERN HEMLOCK.EASTERN SPRUCE.OR HEM-FIR, GRADED"STUD"GRADE./2 OR BETTER. 12.MEMBERS WITHIN BUILT-UP BEAMS WHETHER MADE OF SAWN OR ENGINEERED LUMBER.SHALL ONLY BE SPLICED OVER SUPPORTS. 4. LVL BEAMS.AS NOTED ON PLANS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM Fb-2800 PSI. ��'�� E=2,000.000 PSI, AND Fw285 PSI.LVL BEAMS SHALL BE"VERSA-LAN' 13.PROVIDE SIMPSON Ht OR H2.5 HURRICANE TIES BETWEEN EACH RAFTER _ BY BOISE CASCADE NO SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED.UNLESS BOTTOM AND IT'S BEARING POINT. THE ENGINEER SPECIFICALLY APPROVES PRODUCT SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 14.CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY COORDINATE THE WORK OF ALL TRADES TO WOOD"1"BEAMS SHALL BE"ed"BY BgSE CASCADE.NO SUBSTITUTIONS MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR CUTS AND BORE HOLES IN FRAMING LUMBER IN S BE ACCEPTED,UNLESS THE SPECIFICALLY GIRDERS,BEAMS OR JOISTS,CUTS AND BORE HOLES SHALL NOT BE DEEPER VIL E ENGINEER APPROVES ANOTHER PRODUCTENGINTHAN 1/5 THE MEMBER DEPTH NOR MORE THAN 2-IN DIAMETER,AND SHALL SUBMITTEDBY THE CONTRACTOR. NOT BE LOCATED NEARER 70 THE END RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BEARING REINFORCING CUTS.CANTILEVERS, N THE SPAN THAN THREE N ES i/ ; FASTENING.ETC.-SHALL BE STRICTLY ADHERED TO. THE MEMBER DEPTH NOR WITHIN THE CENTER THIRD OF THE SPAN UNLESS CTucYed ' REINFORCED TO MEET STRESS CALCULATIONS 6. PLYWOOD WALL SHEATHING,ROOF SHEATHING.AND SUBFLOORING SHALL 15.AT WOOD POSTS LANDING ON FLOOR DECK,PROVIDE SOLID VERTICAL WOOD BE APA GRADE.TRADEMARKED C-D INTERIOR YATH EXTERIOR GLUE BLOCKING WITHIN DECK SANDWICH TO LINK UPPER POST WITH LOWER ' SUBFLOORING SHALL BE 3/4"THICK TONGUE AND GROOVE,AN SHALL BE SUPPORT.MATCH UPPER POST 42E i,�•, GLUED TO FLOOR JOISTS WITH AN APPROVED ADHESIVE PRIOR TO NAILING. ! ROOF SHEATHING SHALL BE 5/B THICK AND SHALL BE TONGUE AND r i./ P' GROOVE OR AUGNED WITH METAL H CLIPS BETWEEN RAFTERS WALL I %I SHEATHING SHALL BE 1/2"THICK. �J 'P. 7. ALL WOOD HAVING DIRECT CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR MASONRY,AND WHEREVER WOOD IS W17HP7 B"OF FINISHED GRADE OR PART OF OPEN I DECK CONSTRUCTION.SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED- & JOIST AND BEAM HANGERS SHALL BE BY SIMPSON STRONG-TIE CORP. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STRICTLY ADHERE TO MANUFACTURER'S FASTENING REOUIREMENM 9. UNLESS E7RWI DETAILED OR SPECIFIED OTHSE.PROVIDE AT LEAST TWO JACK STUDS BENEATH ENDS OF 2z12:LVL.AND PARALLAM HEADERS AND BEANS ;--------------_ WHERE POSTS ARE CALLED OUT AS MULTIPLE 2i S.SUCH AS 2-2z6,3-2x6. 4-2x6,ETC..ONE 2x SHALL BE POSITIONED AS A KING STUD AND THE 1 I -- ---� ! -_____ , BALANCE SHALL BE JACK STUDS ------------------I I ______._...._.____. . ._.______ _...________________________________________ ! — \ lei, P. c o I i 1200 0 16"o.c. SLAB ON GRADE I` L____________________________________ J//� E ' •�. I 3-)_3:x91f�LV14 H.G. 02, t - -' _____ ______ _________.._______ _______.___.________ `?PTO o 200 3, 16•o.e. O' 7 ?�G O A X2-2,10- p, WALL �yy�� '�_ ABOVE(TYPrsTMID-SPAN BRIDGING) ,m g'K m Ga' SIEGEL ASSOCIATES,INC.' (TYP)(UNO) • /r- •. CONSULTING STRUCFl1RAi.ENGINEFjtS j 3 EOSP --- - " t xm WL ,� 3-1' __ i- ''p p[`' V+ . `2'r0 T6" J K O ty P 634 Corten°rlweahA Avenue I i 3-2xto 3-2.10 3-2xt0 I x EOS °-Q-' 3- C, �y �,, i \ Newton Crntte,NIA 02459 ,gym Telephone: 617.244.I612 10 Fmcindly 6171".1732 I t 2-2xt6 1 .m ON. I -r 2x10 16"o COV' xT0 h 4 aN- 3 y Duckham + McDouga'I /pgS7 UP # ,; Architects ?+To® `n, a 374 Congress Street Suite 60 .% m UP 1---- - ------- ------ --------------------- -------- °.c Ochusetis 1B ��. J% Boston. Mass I — - --- �.'' 0 2 2 1 0 j 2x6 Pf-LED(ER Telephone: 6 1 7 4 2 2 0 9 5 2 - ,' � ________________• ATTACHED W/ '!!J I I ® Fascimile: 6 1 7 . 4 2 2 . 0 9 6 2 0 2-3/8•m LA BOLTS®16'D.C.00 i 2.8 P.T.O 16b.Hv \ - - - - - — — --------------- ------ - - ----- --- -- ,- � peRt Mossuchusetts j �. ;. FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN I I _ I ?�� 0 . Fs o.o I I Dr imU Sect �NP„ 20207 Number S 102 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN s E , zozo74 * o STRUCTI * I . Date blued: I 9 Ed�4'P I ' I : ISSUED FOR PERMIT 04/05/ I I - �r Revisrore Number Dote Dexript.- I 1 77 ' 1 I � I .. I I 'J I I r ri ryV�i Checked by N i P[A4y�K JQ JQ JQ JQ h +P 4-Ba�•�7f�2Z �S R T • Q� a Q �� � 7-7 .10 CANTILEVER FRAMING Z` " x _ i I 0 7 1+ i INVERT JOINT --- _— _ ____.. _ /i H ,} 6' ` HANGER Ii - 1 r OP JP i ry+rO 02' 2x6 16-o.c. RANGE��+e INVERTRJOIST it 2 VP r# JPY -1; x 2-2.10 ' r/ r J e c r ! h Qdi J J o r/ r .. 3 3 2x10 -2.10 BR( WALL I M1+ 2,10 O 16"o.c. 2x10 016'o.c. 1V4. //• OZ m �' y '/ r ^-��:1`.h 16 pC _ ..i. ? �J 6x18 DOUG-FIR 40. , OR G,o J �'lip xt6"VERSA-LAM OF 306D B WALL i J j i / $�0,1. \> (0 cV 2k7p O 7 L 1+t A0� s .o J J p,, +0 ' +0 +0 / + 0 6 c. + _ ONLY ' O ` i �T '1• �a' /L �- /1• ti 2• c. p O B OpNG BELO + / O- O B O O O Z 4• \ t ti ^ s I O SIEGEL ASSOCIATES,IN 2x10 O 16"o.c. CONSULTING SIRUCil1RAL INGQJEERS 634 6 Commonweft Avenue 7; i 1 I P ry =- ri ti t w 77> Nrwmn Ce nre,MA 02459 ` ryO•Z' DGMID-SPIW BRI ING OJ __Q__O____ry+F'JQ ` 'O ��� ���• "�ti' Telepy an: 617.244.12 MP)(UNO) Fucomlc: ,617,244.1732 O 2-200 + i tr , , o QO 2x O O 6 t B /_ 3 0 6x16 DOUG FIR NO- 1 OR R/ o r P �S OC \ J / P 3' O b MD Ary 5,ix16 VERSA-LAM of 3080 7 P 7 r G + i 2x,0® 16"0 'o W ^ J2 �+ Duckham . McDougal ; — h 0 I � � Architects . _ 7s- 374 Con Tess Street Suite 604; --- —, _ - 0 9 Boston, Massochusetts 2- �! o •,p ,r 1 0 . 0 0 2 2 2-2.10J A� Posj 2rs Telephone: 6 1 7- 4 2 2 . 0 9 5 2 uP ''c Q CANTILEVER IM °'t• P� 2,7�. -' �0`1' Fascimle: 6 1 7- 4 2 2 0 9 6 2 ; - FRAMINGCal JP CONTjN >g•[� 0 10 KENT ROAD; CONTINUOUS *'^9h°^7, Massochusetts } !; FRAMING sue. NDIE SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN j ,.ALL LOAD CARRYING HEADERS TO BE 3-2.10 W/2-2x6 JACKS AND 1-2x6 KING STUD U.N.O. Woimq ScoIC- OF 4ft Project Number. SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN STEWN FAUL 'm 202074 S103 , 8 SIEGEL * 'RRUC7URRAL We blued: ISSUED FOR PERMIT 04/05 2 V I t E � Number We Deseripr— j 1 i SIMPSON/Nc\ R •t ir/ I/ t 'goo AN tYP BOLTS EOSP I 2_2x6 #T? ON- ra 10 HDR. Checked 1 �. •v ` ,fix / /r 3-1%.7Ya'LVL ^>�M1 ro i B:', E 7YP �� J • OZ o-2v8 3-2x 2-2x10 2-2v10 9 i I 7 * 3-2x10 3-2xt0 _ _,. __________ � 2v,12 I �xt2 ( ._�______3=2x10________: ____1-2xJIl_ _ _ __J o__ T4 K -L-2=3x10 2-2x10>� I (I O?Q?? q 11— r —� i ;/.\ I 'o.c.2xto® 16 q�f as tTs - i h y - •Oyu d, y Z CLC.I ------------- 2- x12 �2-1x1Y"LK 2=2x1 ,DR. r ems'` 1ya , - ?# O i iSOLID BLOCKT S RF_O D J I RFR E nmay, I SIMPSO I ,rOe SL90 ANGLE 20•BEAM 5 PPO Ed--? ON 6-B AM OS c I I ( 1.21EOSP i VE -LAN DF 3080 I 2- .v16'LVL 2-1�v16'LVL RIDGE 1 x 3-,$sx7Y'L I RIDE RIDGE 1'gPAN11 111 1 C / r 11 ti / / 71�� HDR.BELOW I I ( l 1 I •.7 /' / ?#lT\ ter `B i :l SIEGEL ASSOCIATESr L9Ci ' SIMPSON CC46 CAP. HANGER 7YP RAFTER j SIMPSON HANGER I 2-3b'm ' I J / CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEF3t$ gT' BLOCK UNDER i6' TO STRUCL RIDGE ALL TRIMMER RAFTERS ,1,J# ,A.'tt , BOLTS EOSP ? il_- � �4_ / 634 CommoaWealih Avemre c4 ---- - I R I� r '3 I / .D\ SIMPSON � 4 s NewtoD Centre,MA 02 59 'm I OG , J r POy7°#B SL90 ANC R ME SIMPSON,HANGER �uA. / Telephmrc: 617244.1612 GrDORMERS asd /OZ SON' 1 Fmilr. 617244.1732 SIMPSON i r' SINPSON 1;_ Y 0 HOB o ' n,: .•` j II 2-35o i .l' J �� i/' a:. HANGER3•t� ' 6 ' II BOLTS EOSP I t� r HDR.BELOW 7 �/ ti / oQ" r• �pN n' ' 1 I #,D I i ---- ---- ' ---------- ----- ---- ckham + McDo \ / v12 VALLEY - - - -- -----� - � �•%i Architects u9a \. h O './ 6 �. +6 't♦ �• ;6 SIMPSON / C> r/ ' i: * %• ..� 4 o M1 M1 O `\ L590 ANGLE : r ._ / 2x1 CLB.Joins M1 ~ ` - \ " „� 2.8 RAFTERS Boston. Congress Street Suite 60A < f3osion, Mossochuselts i M1 0 I•� \ _ o� _ \ 0221 0 OVERLAP PLATES O CORNERS x70 O 16'o.c. ��-. J LAP AND ATTACH RAFTERS INSTALL SINPSON LS0 C STRAP CLG JOISTS ? S'1��y61 DN. ?#8�R �r- `'r MI C-12dIUNG FRAME W/ l i CENTERED TA CORNER 1♦6-1L Y1w6 DN. `\ ,' ,/ * MIN 4-12d NAILS Telephone: 6 1 7 4 2 2 0 9I 5;21 , fw �ScNO(e. P Gl Foscimile: 6 1 7 . 4 2 2 . 0 9 612. 3-2x10 1-.' 3 xt �� 3-2x70 �10 1�i � ' i 200 CLG.JOISTS n•FJ 3_2 TD 10 KENT ROAD s iiingheFrt MDssochusetts J z#To IUN I HANG CEILING FRAMING FOR LVIL 11_.9)5.LVL W/SIMPSON MTSM 16 TWIST STRAP ROOF FRAMING PLAN 1.ALL RAFTERS 2.10 O 16'o.c. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE(U.N.O.) 2.ALL LOAD CARRYING HEADERS TO I, j BE 3-2x8 W/1-2x6 JACKS AND 1-2x6 KING STUD U.N.O. i 3.;RIDGE OF ROOF SYSTEM COMPRISED Drawing Scatr. OF RAFTERS POSITIVELY ATTACHED TO 1/4-_1�_0• I ; CEILING JOISTS. 1*N 4.VERSA-LAM OF 3080 BEAMS BY BOISE CASCADE p �,ed Nmbm WITH MINIMUM Fb=30BO psi. E=2.000.000 psi AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN - s SEGEL m 202074 S 1 0 Fv=285 psi. W. 116 * 6TRUCTURA * j . .• 9QIa E+o��� Date Issued: I I � ISSUED FOR PERMIT 04/05 2 I { P<2xG SILL PLATE 2.6 STUD WALL • • WITH SILL SELLER Rudistots 10 ROUON FAST BOOR AY Ti6 PLYWOOD Ntrn6FW Date ' susTUDOR T+6 PLYWOOD 1/r F(L4LV.ANCHOR I OWNRooR SI>BFtDOR Ba05 AT 67 0.0 lOP dF fxINCREIE 2:10 AS PER 1 7 17 02 PERNT SET pEy- t M CONICAEIE SLAB W/ ¢Ev s -2 mm p APRox m ' 6�itlC tOPOLr t cR on SLOPED 0yr Pc COMPRESSIBLE TOP d COIICE7E MIEN SRL SEATER *STAB➢N2011m R ON Ir Sm i I flDl. 1 3 TA.CONCRETE EDGES AS SFDNtL vt cox PLYWOOD SFA7HBIC ¢2 F}Ev..M.RFPER m I I uATa DOSIND 2-►s aws TOP ANDBOTTOM rd Vf°cuvANlzm ANCHOR I7mv MMM71ON f MIN.+e sINICF.DRPIINGS �... SOL75 AT 6d D.C. , _ ITT sFBEF 2-I5 B.U6 TOP I 1 _ = AND BOTTOM _ I 5. tU7CN ExIsmNG 6x6 W1A x V �-iFut l WI.4 WBF CONPRESSANE flt1ER WITH I DWPROOFM ty - - ASPHALTIC BASE DUIPPRONNO . lX5 1 W/STONE DUST.SEE IC CONY R7E LAB WITH 1 SPECB%Aigl6 * Sty 76IFI I tO 10 Wff... / ON 8 IA POLY T 1? r r I s -O5 B4P5 TOP AND VAPOR BARRIER ON T sCOMPACTED CRUMrmE I ",, OP r t?!. COMPACTED LauvEt. b ND BOTTOMTOP OF /- Of fOOITNG �� _ __ _ 1 VERIFY N ELEV.- WTCH EXISRNG O VERIFY N FIELD o H + L FOUNDATION PVC Y• , 74 1 DPAN - �� I I Yd If■2C CUROAIDUS CONCRETE FOOTING I I FOUNDATION DETAIL W/ STONE g TYPICAL FOUNDATION 0 GARAGE o_ (� FOUNDATION DETAIL AT g 77 FOUNDATION DETAIL 0 GARAGE AND HOUSE j 1 SCALE: 3/4' ,=d SCALE- 3 4 k b GARAG3 APRO� t SCAIX-3/4' I I f BLUESTONE PAVERS __ 24 STUD WALL W COX PLYWOOD SFIFATFMIG, 2.6 STUD VN11 ON SETIRR:BED AND E1EV Od(2O5D� Y�vmywoo OVEAIM FOIx�1gN f 1!tFLOOR COMPACTED FILL 6 lOP OF STAB IF E� 114 FIRST RDOR wT.PLYMOOD CONCRETE AND F1EY U4 � EEEV - _ _- -_ _ lOP DF CONCRETE �.lOP OF STAB D 1O PER R01INGSIGS STRUCTURALEIEV 2 to- O.C. ANCHOR BONS 6 ' BEAN-SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 4)EE - 'lS` •� I . STEEL RATE --------_-- a = Am l0 PER STRUCTURAL I tn�+' :, TOP SHELF DRAWIICS UV CON SNEIP I I I/f°TAG BOLTS COBBLESTONES ON _s -'L-::!s�'• •_ •� •. •. MATCH COMING EIEV=_a I -OM e0R5 TOP AND I 6 STONE DWI I BOTTOM ! . STEEL SALLY CMIAMN PER "4.,6- NlESIONE PAVERS I W7C1 EKRiNC I�7' UCTURAL DRAWINGS lOP OF SHELF ON SETTING BED AND F1FV-1=51- 4 CONCRETE AND 6 COMPACTED FOE SHELF ro BE KEY AND FEBAR }pNT Fft1FR MRL BELOW GRADE b '� D41PRODFM TOP OF FOOTING SIRS DALPPRD0FM E. EL- 6t t OOSING b CONCRETE SLAB I Y pl B MiIAEIFR iOl T-5 BARS STAB *' .:.::`•� �SUB BASE }/f! - TOP a BOTTOM ELEYMATCH -t Y "=.,d Y WMPTUA SLAB CRUSHED i YA7CN Ex61ING STORE - I I I Fldll FOOTING WITH - _ ,. mil 7d RF/ER ROCK it BOTTOM17a 2!CONCRETE NDFSIURBEO EARTFF FODIItD .',6'/: = ti 4 PERFORATED 17e 24'CONCRETE PVC FOUNDATIONFOOTING ` DRAINSLABION m6r 6,,LLO/1O WNF7p 7d OVER 6 MILLIMETER POLY ON S COMPACTED L��li�ltk�ham 1 CRUSHED STONE T LALLY COLUMN FOOTING g FOUNDATION STEPS AT ENTRY jjg FOUNDATION AND MUDSILL AT ENTRY g TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAIL g Arddt� SCALE: 3 4'�t'-O' SCALE: 3 4-=1'-O' 2 SCALE: 3 4'-1'-O' ^ SCALE: 31,C ,=d ti 374('mjgeO .$tlioe6O4 2.6 STUD WALL 2.6 STUD WALL 02210 COLUMN BEYOND 2.6 STUD WALL RO1111N FIRST FLOOR ROURI FWST ROOR ELFV= Yf 7+0 PLYWOOD CALV.SNAP ANCHOR EIEV W7aG PLYWOOD W T,C PLYWOOD Tdq&w (617)422-0953 SUBRODR SUBROOR ROUOI FW6T FLOOR SIIBFLODR ' ITT cox PLYWOOD SHEATNRIG M J�f RODR 5/4 5//4 ASEE SPECIFICkTIONS SEE ST DECKING a JOIST 1 (617)422-O96t OVERLAP FOUNDATION I-M6N ONSto EDP OF COtIQEiE 2.10 PER SIR 1�aF oF7x lw of DEOT Vf CUT PLwo6o 9GAT1@M o PER EIEY-�1P t a'.= O4"FIXRAMTION f MIN. UCTURAL ELLv P.T.2r8 016 0.c -� � P.T.2.8 016 D.C. ALUMINUM FLASHING Tw orCF.CONCRETE $up1]Q .S1dCdCC MATCH DUSFING P.T.218 0 T6 Be ..�' Y EIEY.-V-t7 3 Bu TOP tF CONCRETE lOP Di CONCRETE ElEV-1-3 NIO PER STRUCTURAL MATCH DLbTING !4 OS BP%TOP AND 1I1R.art Ro°d b 22 /a51 BAILS TOP AND •..'; RATE WITH SILLSEALER - •T.2>fe PLATE- TOP OF WiLLI •.ATV• DRAWINGS GRADEBOTT - TTOM B6mem6k,Mae�tmem . ATONE VENEER p GRANITE STEP STONE vDm 'j" L7°GAEVNID;D T uc•-v-i 3 . ' c lOD 6 SIEIi 1/r.GLL!7 D ANCHOR AT GRADE BEYOND ANCHOR BOLTS 0 MATCH COSTING rF - •' OWN BOL75 AT 6-V oc. F;d aC. VERIFY N FEED DAMPRODFING- BALT011 WITH BICIOlE WITH BAC FLL WTIFI ONPROOFNG GRADE 8': CRUSHED STONE 4 �6: CRUSED CRUSIED STEINS 3� UK ro BE S - Wyman I FOUNDATION DETAILS Jr MUD SLAB ON 6 uN EaDmE b 2-15 BARS r i SCOMPACTED mNE cRNstBD lO 05 BARS P BOTTOM •6.. taP Sr = TOP a BOTTOM ETiE�v OF SWAT 3 i �y•.."�'. _ _ _ _________ b b DYM VERIFY IN TOP AND BOTTOM ___ _ _ ____ _ . �,�iO _ E1FV- 3 RIVER RIVER ROLL Fa z 6 SONOtUBE _ t `- . BACKFOL • $ ,I AS NOTED BAC(FAL I I - - �i�- lOP ff FORMING tr EDP OF FOOIBIG !r t PERFORATED - <'PLRFORATED ELEy.r ; _ EEEW-- IE t-• . PVC FOUNDATION ,7- ^r( VERf!N FIEID VERFY N FIELD GRAIN rt MUD ON 6 BRAN FOUNDATION 7 t slow EO MUD�cRUNSF U R°jeei Nulneer. COMPACTED CRUSHED 01012 I i 7d 24 1r x 24'FOOTING 24 STONE Date h � �105 JIILY 17,21xa FOUNDATION DETAIL W/ STONE g VERANDA CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL g VERANDA STEPS ® CONCRETE g LEDGER AND FOUNDATION WALL g TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAIL 3 n 0 0 FOUNDATION WALL 4 AT PORCH SCALE: 3/4' 1=d SCALE: 3 4'=1'-O" SCALE: 3 4'=1'-O' �w SCALE: 3 SCALE 3/4 r 1=d 1, Nubs Dots DesvF 7,7 §6 i NEAMES DDSM CMEtRUMM I --------------------------------------, ro RE)AAK PRDIECF MOM CONSTRUCMK --- , mDmym AREAS ro DE REWOVED. I ; twdmd byI 1 1 I t_—-----------—___—_—______—__--_______ __—__—---—-------------------- _ i -________- ----- ---- —---- — ------—---—-----------------—__� i i l i VERIFY N ' - 1L0. i i i i 1\ . `---PROVIDE 16il1C ACCESS TO CRAWL SPACE I ' ',+---RERFD�E EXSFIND ' " spAiNELL 70 WDaW,OPENMO FOR I BE RERFovtD , ACCESS 10 CRAWL m SPACE i i i I . r-----------, ' Z LALLY COIUNNS I FkEPLACE/CHILMEY 70 .",.� ARID BEAN ABM M BE ----------- BE ROXWED REPLACED MOH NEW. . REFER 70 SFRUCNRAL DRAWINGS. Dt1Ckham+MCDD* ^PELO+F EY61NG Architects te is MMDW.OM"FOR `1LW11 G.41 i SPM�ro cRNRI y4ompm am,%suite6m m,ma t 02210 I , Tdgh= (617)422-0,952 )xsimlo (617)422-0962 i ------- ------ Ii B1nd- -- IDRaaRoad I ence B=sWk bkm&uero i FOUNDATION DEMOLITION PLAN I Dra*q sc 11r I,Cr i 01012 Dots� FOUNDATION DEMOLTION PINT .RAY n.2002 „�_,d D100 ; i Rbtidons I f - Mwlma LbDe ` 7 17 02 vERwr sEr. I ; II f i IE u WES AREAS TO BE REMO1U i u Ep I i ii ilI I I n ri I i 11 IY ;E 11 EI , I n iii ,ut'tid� GF J. f `---------- ---------'-------- - - J`------------------------------, , --- -- --- E---------; ____=,?;;-------------------- -------r------------------------------,1 t. iE o 1 EE 1 I I EMRY FAMILY ROOM I Ei i I 1 I I , 11 ---- i -- \ 10 KL BEDROOM, ; ;_ >L___-__J �_- - E r'_ ia;___'e__—; KRIHN ii l i n F X i-_�e , 1 0 ' JWALLL __________ ; WEN 1 E I______________ CLOSET ii 1i I1~_—____�____-y 1�___________________________� ______ 11 CLOSET 9 Q�T 11 f_71�____�"____ Ih_______________________________� . L-_J 11 II II"u it it 1 _L____ _____J 1 1� YI ;E 11 �� ^� BEDROOM 2 ;; LMW ROOM A `ecb I i u *d.M I 3/4 Co%m&m+1 SAC 601 i ii i I i 02210 Tdepl�e (617)412-0952 II n n i (617)422-0962 WESLIBULE b� R''/� ply:�p i L ``mod l i Buono Yleni 1 I lO R�Rood 1 I 1 1 1 1 Iq�14 i I I L------------J i i FNW FLOOR DBO ION PLAN ao.LYy swa: 0,012 ' Dab ba1YQ .. �1 FIRST FLOOR DEMOLTION PLAN A&Y 17.MW D101 I i ! I Number Dots Dmrktan I 1 7 7 m PE1t1Aff SET 1 j I I ; ro REI& t PRDTECr buR1s caaTnuenOK I {{ { uaoMUEs AnEu ro BE xE1ro+Ea I I {� I 7-1 NmW by I{ 11 i{ (` 1 , I i i i� 1FFFD�rCy I ': 1 1 r l F> rw�11 1 I . 1 ! { I { { { � I { 1; { I; f ,1 1 , _____________J , II f fr------------------------------------------' 1 11 ------------------------------J� r i{ ;1 „ i-;----'FTn fl „ - ;� ;r;____y____� BATH 2 i{ ' �----------------- 1 a , ` L---� ._ CLOSET n • { BEDROOM 3 kl- ` Y_ iLl L ______I _ 1 1 ti cwsEr 1 1 oa ; T� YYYYYYii�+M�V4� „ O VV ___ _ _ _ �374OaStica 5T111t6M �m2 `-f 1 1 11 ,LL JJ 1 02210 _iJ {j 11 ;I TdgLme (617)422-0;952 I --------------------------------- -----------------'r-----------------------------'1 I E------------------------------------- J------------------i I Faaml7c (617)422-0962 -------------------- Now Residue i SECOND FLOOR DEMOL MON FLAN i Dmbq Scdc TIC t=v Pmjad Number: w 01012 i , SECOND FLOOR DEMOLTION PLAN JM 17, D102 AZo2 A7D, , 7,7 Pmwr SEi AA f0 � JY•p. i 1 2 J ® I A3D1 Ar L tali CNCRET gj 14'ir 154 259ri . E0. f E0. ---EO.---- P)r '--- EC----- 11-71c f R=11 f Y-7)r i 12 ---FEQ-- 7 49{' M01 CE) � 1 1 tr --- w o ---- --------- ^-- O ___ -- __-__-__ _____________ ____________________ A f ti _i LAUNDRY MUD RRE ON yy t -'- CHUTE AKNE t; C to. 10 Azat ® 7-tom Y-eK W Y-Y 7-9w 1'-4'1=9P 4a1r 4+r1t=�3C 1=6 Y-sY. �aR i ,tJJ,I, ' ® _ ________11 R.O. R.O. R.O. R0. R0. R0. w00D RR O O L O ``d !q A ? p .f SCREEN RCH --- / A2M i FlRS1 BOOR SUlYl00R ® WOOD A i r/ DAWN w00D i + WOOD {�/ 7 RFAR NNL A LIRRAfn, UP / g WOOD 0 '1E07 ! i AIM 1 C � t � 1 1 I i O , � I 14 f { I snW1 EA D 3 ! I hm Aay I I ROOM 'wyI�0 O , �NWOOD A'�J / ? L4w.!►= McDD__y' ---- 0 RO Y`?'ll �D7 "V� 12 A PANTRY � IARA,ROOA1 A ^ a &cEte . WDOD WOOD ® A1' �{' r • ® 1 sM 1 D ,t K'�"� W f �4 Cmp® tut S>me 60{ }S Bo"Mmadmft r- -- s 022I0We � 7dep6oae (617)422-095E SUN ° woo0 O © © i Fa®lc (617)422-OI62 Of J: O R''MfA 4 p�y�s ;� �. E0.t'-9A' i=9JC 1cgK•E0. fn 5.19� 1'-4)f' t=1U� 1=9X 6- t'-97j EQ §' JJ{mo Rje i&nn J �Q. RQ R0. R0. R0. R.O. R0. R.O. `r,*. 'r O f ^ s ID RKew Road H ___ ____ ------------------ ___—_____-____________ ----------------- 1 RO --.\ FIRST FLOOR PLAN; I=ttl6 7SC 9-wf loW - •�� g nC s ac f 64 f f f f T 1� ---- - 4K 6 da.in9 Smlc 7 1 i 1 A,M A201 AJ01 sk° DI' Rojed Numbs: 0101E Dale bmw& r�l FIRST FLOOR PLAN JULY 17.20M A.101 II Rwtmws - Hullbat Dots � � I , 7 17 02 PERWF SET I z I . I •p fkE Jg,a, ro i Rq °•Y yE, I / k0 f0 B• 1 ! I B' I / D r_r/ O ` Ch..kd by 2 // ��� iE' / 0 11 ii r 53'-3x• CK / / E0. 1'-9)E• �r-ix• 1•-9x• E0. // 8 R0. RD. R0. llllffff ____ t h ll ! t O / ! I STER HROM TILE B a 1 I a'-1x'_ t'-sx' S'-a' 1'-BTf 3'-tx' t'-ax' -a• t'�sx'` Ccil) R.0. PO* RAJR0A 1 I � � I 3 1 1 1 1 / I I I 1 1 V® I 1 ® J C fQ I I I 1 1 I I I p I I I I 1 Y / / O I j I CLOSET ___ I / 1♦ I i � I �� ♦ I � �J HALL '°I / 00 m / 7 o / 1 / A402 \ / 0 i I E + ® QD 1 E E O vD® J` o 1 1 i 1_________ _____________ -_ _ I CLOSET vow V= I E 5e1 , A C �T ) 2 1 VMD 1 / I ♦ ____ - I / A Architects® / ♦ / I / STUDIO � - ♦ vDDD 374Cawm%ca.gdk6MCD . Bow%ma I i / 1 / ♦ i I I h / /• $ 02210 ♦ 1 ♦ 84t I/ � � --------�--____-� D i '" i ♦♦ c TdepSlac (617)422.0952 E OB OA OB b L" Famm7c (617)422-0962 <<" T 4'-IW r-Bw c-a• +'-�i• r-ix- r-vs• O ' / -' � i/AMO Rimidem R.0. i rye, 0 y10 Fid Rmd ------ ------- ------ ------------------------------------- `. . ------------ ♦ tbJ kq I I e'e• r-6V a'-1,� r-Dc J SECOND FLOOR PLA41 I 2 , 2 A3o, Dma Scdc A201 P/,kd Hombw. 01012 Dou 1sma t—, \,SECOND FLOOR PLAN ,IDLY 17,2002 AlUZ I I mtff Dote 7 17 P ffiffi r I I I Idd byI A4°1 mot w. I . f / � Aft / 2 . LOPE SLOPE S / / 1212 12:12 I ... •+ 1 / j A a�99 / I / ! j A401 II __ ____ ____ __ _ _______ ___________ I r— --------� — , SLOK SLOPE SLOPE / I I / 1212 —1� 120 12a2 12:12 r! ' I 1 / A401 1 I 7 j 540 I I A401 a A4ot t ~ / I A40t f / 1 F A401 11 I 1 N 2 A401Archit" 1 SLOPE �_ w / 1 i I 212 1212: 1 / ,� % 374 Cmpm Shoat,sake 601 / 02210 1 A401 126 12 — it AM 7tlephmc (617)422-0952 s �— ---�--- r -- --- — ---------- ------- -- -- — ,� i Pw17c (617)422-0Y62 AM \, A40 ___ _- !a� Bum Residence � 6 �♦ i 4 \\ 10 Rat Read A401 / A401 `` f \\ Ro1mm61e,Malmdmtelb i i _____________________________________ A401 5 I 1 7 f A401 A401 i ROOF PLAN 5 . A401 Drorig Sede: VIC- IT Rr Jed Mnb r. 01012 Date ROOF PLAN AkY 17,2M A103 ,w6w Dde 1 7/17102 PMW SEI 2 , A303 R3o1 7 0 8 A401 AM >ocked by 4 9 A401 A,0fRFD,�. Qq,oy�op�� -------------__ — — --- 3 ----- �-nnC ------ -- ®im ® ® ELat-51 A B A ',B 6 A401 ---- A;Bi ------- AAA 'c. ELF+( ---G, _ 6 A A A 111 1 9 S102 5102 - 5102 NORTH ELEVATION 2 1 z A302 A302 A30, Duckhm+MCDo* Architects e e 314Cm*®Stec,SS„iftM 4 , A,OI 1� A,OI , 02210 �� tQ12 Aao1 Ughwe (617)422-0952 ——————— ——— 3_ — -- — ---- ----------------- FAim,le (617)422-0961 EL=atY-23 --- --- — — —A — ---- lit ———————————————— Buono Residence E1. +t4-51 ) A B R B B A 10KedRwd _ 6 BBee0h�,1d87 Khwem A,OI 2 5 5 0 ' A,OI ------ — ---- -- -— — ——————————————————————------- — ---------- ---- -- — ------ - FL-+ -31 ---- — — B B G K K K A Y f1--_•tv"'!e ————— 01012 12 13 to 7 - 10 . � EAsr ELEVAnoN �� �� S� S,>oz s>� � A201 JULY 17,2002 RrA*m . Nub Dde De Dan ' 1 A,02 1 7 17 i2 PMM 0 7 6 A,W A,01 ----- — — ---—— -� _ -- ————————— EL_ 1-23 A,OI --------- a.7m •' ---- 4 of EL• 14-5 im A A . 6 smomp 5& ---------- e MO FL_ MO1 HnninnIl Inn nnn 6 G H 7 13 12 Sloe Sloe S102 2 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 1 2 A301 A302 A302 Ducidum ®� Arclu�tects McD�gal s 1? 3740=pm&reek Saioe601 Mm CVI 7 e a 2 0�0 Aam Mm Q,2 Q1z 7dcphm (617)422-0952 >himle (617)422-0962 —————— 3 —— ——— 3 ——— —————————_ ---------- — -- --- ---------- �— P,01 —— A901 a. +,-,, -- - ------- Buono Residence ----- -- • y=+(„-5 1 9 A A 10 Tim$md - 2 5 5 ----- ----- pppt ----------- ------ ----------------- A,OI ---- -- A401 ———— -------- +(3 1 ) 111h.'Ally Eli ME --- ---- - D�qS� a�+ -- ---- --- ------------ — ---------- ----- ,ia. ,� 9 5 g 2 IO Rime Numbs: 01012 Sloe SI02 SI02 SI02 SI02 w ^ ^ WEST ELEVATION DateH2O2 JIA.Y 17.WM Numbw Dd. 7 7 02 PEMR SET o „ Aim Dix 1 2 A303 A303 ® �® Architects+;McDougal AM 44m Mal Boata°'Moshulft a y 02210 MCI A4m �10 �� Tdep6me (617)422-0952 ------- EL=+1•T3 -- — Fl.=it-236 ----- -- _ 3 -----_ F>o�lc (617)422-0962 • /----------- --- --- EM rwm Fl.=t16-a 1 5 1 B EL.•il 1 S Now Ra --- — — ------ 111Rm,Raod • 7 Q.-t(14- D -_ - 7 i la-s i - -- e A a id�.Llb�. z z z A� — — --------------- , — ------------- ----------- ---- ———— —— ———————— — a �1) ------ MI9C�lANEOUS ELEVATIONS II El.•i ------ ------- ---- p,,.t ---- --- --- — — --- — -- -- -- -------- ----- ---- 6 ScuW. 1/r.VT 5102 L PMIMA Nmbar. ! 9 01012 A012 S10? We PARML ELEVATION AT GARAGE AND UBRARY pMML ELEVATION AT GARAGE JMY 17.2002 a 2O3 IMdame Number Me v , �n PEr+vr siT M01 e MO, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ FL- i-23 —————— ---- — -- —_-- ---- — -- -------- . Ell EL_♦1 41 eEoaoau V LL x" EL=+14-SI SECM ROUGH S S MOt M01 EL-+ -S1 6) --- — — — — — -------- I _ 1 [ROAD ROOM FII/ER pp EL•' B/311ENf g� BUILDING SECTION 'B' y ----------- ------------------- Mot _- 1 1 t Mot 1 Arc}utech `•"""P i 374Gz,g= m,r,•saibe,a EOemo,i ': ozuo ----------- — ��,,,��----------- — — -- ' ———————————— Tdepbmc (617)422-0952 EL-+t-4 IN) �————————————� - m mo � CLOSET— CLOSET wu wu BEDROOMFasimk (617)422-0962 I I ---------- I EL= 14-5 1 1— 1 ! Buono Residence I 1 1 1 ————————————————————— =1—————————- mmio FU11 MKOE BUILDING SECTIONS ————— ————— ————————————————————— ——————————- ,K' B441ENf . Pro)ed Number. 01012 BUILDING SECTION 'A' - JIAY 17 2002 301 �. .. ._ �. Numbv Wte 1 7 17 02 PERIN SET - 7 1 ) 4 i DwIced by: i Ey.+t-23 ————————_--� -- — ——————————— _--- -- -- ————---- ———— MASTER SEWN WIS7m n / �iH 1 10 ETD 1 SONG AREA NOD ROOM' ------ ---------;-------------------- ----------- �V BUILDING SECTION 'D' ——————_————— , 1 A40 ---- --- ^°' Architects McDmgal 4 94(bmgm&[o.Suit 601 �41 -- ————————— — — --- -- -------- 02210 i---------- -- — —————————— -- -- ————————— NO= (617)422-0952 El_=+t-At ———————— ———— ----------` ————————— - Pamm�c (617)422.0962 L+11"•5 liar) BATH MAN STAIR F !WLL I . 5 B110n0 Residence -1 r--- ----- -- --- -- — ————————— EMIT-.711 PAMiRf HAIL BUILDG SECTION I ————————— — —————— ———— N—b g Stdz .. EASEMEAT a` Plojad N—t., E - D7012 uoW BUILDING SECTION 'C' 4.. Y 7 2002 30 -. Itevhlar W-dw Dde 1 7 17 PUM SU M0, I 1 1 1 xked by 1 ————————— ——— kl tt-TS -- --- 1 1 1 ' FL•i1-41 1 BC61 M01 --- 1 2 h 1 1 1 1 1 I {( f—————————— ---- ——————————— ` �--------— — MO LWPAW 6ON GRRkE ---_-- ——————— a-M ENT BUILDING SECTION 'EWRO Lad t 1� 1 l TM' 1 L4�+M Architects 314C4l,gea 5tr«t, tDR.°W---- ——————————— 021I0 EL= t-23 --------- -- -- — -- ——————————— Tdq5mc (6l7)422-0952 Pkimk (6I7)422-0962 --- — Loll=t,4-S i 10 Road —————— Butt k M Fl._ , —1 B1maa(,IS amcLmau 1 1 BUILDING SEMONS L, a .+ — --------- ---- --- — --- --------- ..,. Dmwirq scdc 1/4 IT -Rged MmDet: 01012 BUILDING SECTION 'E' MY n zoa2 A303 .1ua , -- aN63 RED CEDAR SHINGLES WITH 1tm„bs D* mum.cur FOR RED CEDAR SINGLES W/DBL DOLE STARTER COURSES SUM FRAME STARTER COURSE ON 1X3 ON 1.3 FIR SIRAPPIING AT r / 7 17 02 PE TNT SET SIRAPPm•r Ot.WITH 2r ON CENTER WITH 2r PLYWOOD AND PLYWOOD STARIIC 8-m TIP. SOURING BMW a BdSE.TYPICAL FRME BMW __ — �SCO MOULDING / /8013 i X 6 RAXE g a 1D I BOARD RA!BELOW SE 11/A401 BMW CROWN 8801 5/4X6 rREM BOARD 1 Y 8- STRIP VENT gxTo tE 50TFR ' ABOVE EL-+16-4 Ickd by 12 DETAIL AT COLUMN/SCREEN PORCH 7,8 TYPICAL RAKE DETAIL AT DORMER A TYPICAL EAVE DETAIL AT DORMERSCALE: 1 1/Ym t'-dSCALE: 1 t/Y 1-Cr `t ScnLE: 1 7/Y m It-Cr 1 MAHOGANY CAP RED CEDAR SHIN=W/DEL STARTER COURSE ON 1X3 - STRAPPING D r O.C.WITH 2r Zr PLYWOOD STARRING BANG.TYP. RED CEDAR SHINGLES W/DBL JBBD13O MOLRDINC ` STARTER COURSE ON 1X3 ( STRAPPING O r O.C.WIM 2r / 2X BLOC KDW W PLYWOOD STARTING BOND.TIP. 2r OC 1 X 10 RAKE BOARD 1X STOCK 5/4X6 FRIEZE BO.MM BROSCO MOULDING 1x 4 V-GRDYE 10 DETAIL AT PORCH RAILING 7 TYPICAL RAKE DETAIL AT UPPER ROOF Z TYPICAL EAVE DETAIL AT UPPER ROOF SCALE: V s t Cr SCALE: 1 t/T 1=d J SCALE: 1 1/Y - It—Cr J.sEcaw naoR RoTxa ROUGH HERO A, TA S CEDAR SHINGLESW/DB- IT' ELEV._ - STARTER Go NIR D ON iX3 STRAPPING o 5 D.C.WITH zr PLYWOOD STARTING&M TYP. RED CEDAREOt OB. BEOSCO MOULDING STARTER COURSE ONN IX3 17LT ]8 I STRAPPING D r O.0 WITH TIP. / 2X FL.00MNG 0 `Ai't PLYWOOD STMTRIG amTW. 2r OC 1 X 10 RAKE I P1L I BOARD BtDSCO MOULDING T / 1X STOCK I18UT3 Dix + EL/I I, i/4��W...�AkIIiJJJt�fuiJliilli ♦•+ ecft I MOWDING/019 DRDSCO Y Y $ I 5/4X6 FRIEZE BOARD #1 1t 1i4 3m g Y 8 BoA006 MlsM&IMM I nil 01210 1� T&pb= (617)422-0952 I FXnlm7c (617)422-0962 10 DETAIL AT PORCH COLUMN BRACKET 6 TYPICAL RAKE DETAIL AT LOW ROOF 3 2 TYPICAL EAVE DETAIL AT LOW ROOF SCALE: 1 1/2' 0 1=d b SCALE: 1 1/Y 1=d rD SCALE: 1 t/2' m 1 cr Buono Reidem RI KmL Road FLOOR N BImm61S mamchulmE VET BY MP-WMDO RED CEDAR SHINGLES WRH STAMM COURSES RED CEDAR SHMJES W/DR. RED CEDAR SHINGLES W/DEL OONN i1,3 MAPPING AT r STARTER COURSE ON 1X3 STARTER COURSE ON 1X3 —� ON CENTER WITH 2r PLYWOOD MAPPING W r OX.WITH 2r STRAPPING•r O.C.WITH 24' STARTING BAND AT BASE TYMAL PLYWOOD STARTING BAND.TYP. PLYWOOD STARTDiG BMW.7YP. t2 ROOF AID EXTERIOR DETAILS / 2 F BBO6C0 MOULDING To I /80,3 �I j�T��F 1 Y SfOpI 880%W MOULDING F.ROSGO CROWN JOB t t 118013 CROWN SEE 6 ORANIXS FOR DmBA9 xe. 1 Y VENT STRIPSONG OF JOISTS AS NOTED 1 x 4 V'OROVE ,3. H - x 8 I 01012 IA lit Dote Ism& JtRY,7.2002 A401 n NAVE DETAIL AT UPPER ROOF =5TYPICAML NAVE DETAIL AT PORCH ROOF g TYPICAL VENT DETAIL AT ROOF RIDGE J S:CALE: 1 1/Y 1-Cr a. 1/Y 1=d SCALE: 7 1/Y 1'-d = i 7 17 02 PERKY SET g 75 r1 MA0)FLUf AT TEi9LlIATIOl1 �Ts-ro �1 vc—1 CM►0E1f AT TER1dF141roN 7 14 "' lfS�OARC t I I IN FLUE ABWE ROOF I I I I 1 I I I I 1 14 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 7 tf-f4 Oe 6 1 I 1 l i i i g rN Y_FLUE ABOVE STUDY t3 I I 1 1 I I I I I �LCNBf1EY AT SECOND FLOOR �/�-f0 RL91 5101[ItFMIN i i FIREPLACE PIAN AT MASTER BEDROOM I I I I I I I I I I t I I 1 I I 1 I i 4 �TIP 1 r r — , slot xrrlw Ducha Q+1.lcLN`gal I I RI91 swc IfiVlIN � I 1 � 1 1 I f 2�NAAV F1RFPlACE PIAN AT LMNG ROOM L]rchit" 4 FT MACE PIAAN AT WHEN/SRTM ROOM 3/6-fd 314CapsSheet,Smee601 I I s/ti-r�r Baatlm,b!>muhox,b t I i I 02210 TekpLme (617)422-0952 I I Fmimk (617)422-0962 I , ASH Prr MM CLEANCIJIT77- Now Residence ` lORmtRmd I I I SEE MWRIO S,rOR SEE DPAwm St i'OR � : I FOO M WORW11011 roonwo.saawnon I FIREFRACE PUM AT BASEMENT FiREFRACE PLAN AT BASOMO 3 FIREPLACE DUA0.S 1 MAO, MACE SEC110T, 2 MAOJ FTRf M ELEVATION UV91G ROOM FT OLACI SM" ;1 LMNG ROOM RRV ACE ELEVATION s/a-r�l► s-ra ob.Ry sw,s AS NOTED Pro ed w be" 01012 XLY m A402 T Number ODLe - : , 7,7 PEMAT SET 9 SPIGUE POLE MU SPSMOM SAD GENERAL U M NOTES 6�war-WAY SILIITOI � RETURN AR ,. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTS TO BE PUT ON A ® FHUFOCELL AND LOCATED ON A SEPERATE FOUR-WAY SMDCH SUPPLY AR CNLIRT ON PANEL. SWITCH WITH DIM ER #*p SIMMER LIGHT 2. ALL MOM WA AND PHDTE PLATES TO BE LOCATED N THE BASEBOAIO UNLESS MB SROCH O FAN OOIERWIM 14MATED. ®UDCTRC RAMP HEAT ® Mew UGIR ®UECRDC UDTDR- ® CLING MOUNTED LIGHT ' ®CABLE OURS, VV' OUTDOOR FLOOD UGHTS Idd by (3) SMAOE DETECTOR ?S SCONCE LN#0 . ® HEAT DETECTOR 0 LON VOLTAGE LOT ® ® MORON DETECTOR O RECESSED CIOUNG UCHT VN NATO SPEAKER TRACK LIUM ♦ IELDIffm OUTLET --------—' CONE UCHTS DOUBLE T D'M E OUTLET LADDER CABDffT UGMS F • SFCUFM KEYPAD CLOSET UGHTS _ -- to PULL BOOM SMDES O RECESSED S1EA m ® SPEM OUTLET FLUORESCENT UGHT y 0 RECEPTACLE ® UGHT/VW/HEAT ONND 0 Ow RECEPTACLE ® HEAT LAMP YRp WATERPROOF RECEPTACLE ' 8 SPUT RECEPTACLE 9 GROUND FAULT RECEPTACLE _ - OI CLOCK RECEPACLE 0 FLOOR RECEPTACLE 0 CEIIBM RECEPTACLE x UDSTNG CONOMNid — '�`r i -- ---- - , QF_- - - "- i wpc I a--- a- Q P--------- -� :------ 4 I o-- -----Q �;----- + I r --- ----- *� ----- ArchitectsMC�OuPI y M SL 0 ------------------- SY Boa^Mmadoft . 6 a 4 02210 Q--------Q d' Tdgmo (617)422-0952 - -- --- -- b _ 1 0962 V SY� famm�e 22- I r l2 ________ i _----------__ � Buono R�sideace a-' I A.= --� - lORMRDod o=------- FIRST FLOOR oFCTR C& AND REFUL10 CEILING PLAN mo*n Swkc ,ir ID' Project Nwter. 01012 FIRST FLOOR ELECTRICAL AND REFLECTED "CEILING PLAN JULY T,..2002 A701 L - _ s none. Dde 7 17 02 PERINT SET STNME POLE YMR01 SPRINKLER HEAD GOERAL uranaG NMM DREfrm NOUN RETURN AR I. ALL OOIDDOR UiTS TO BE PUT ON A PHOTOCELL AND LOCATED ON A SEPERATE t�FOWWAY SWRCH ® SUPPLY AR CRQME ON PANEL. p mm WON MA" I%p SHOWER LMMH EE ALL ELECTRICAL THE AND PHONEDk%UPLATES NLESS TO . ,WEB SWTCN O FAN OTERMSE tWrATED. ®ELECTRIC RADtM HEAT ® PEHYMFf um - ®ELECTRIC MUM ® CMNG MUILED LIGHT ®CAME OUTLET W OUTDOOR FLOOD LKMTS (3) SMOKE DETECTOR a SCONCE LIGHT O _ _ ' Dh�by ® HEAT DETECTOR LOW VOLTAGE UMMH _ ® woom DETECTOR 0 RECESSED CELMO UGHI R ®AUDID SPEAKER tea- TRr�Tc UGFIIS , ' SPK ---- TELEPHONE OUTLET ----------- COVE L1CHM DOUBLE TELEP m OUHET UNDER CABINET L GM All -0 O �� •. . SECIM KET9MD CLOSET WRTS PUL - , L WRN SHMES 0 RECESSED SIEPUGHT 0 SPECK OUTLET FWDRESCENT UGHT a_" A @ RECEPTACLE ® UGM/VEM/HEAT CO&W QUAD RECEPTACLE ® HEAT LAMP - - WP� WATERPROOF RECEPTACLE O' 9 SPLIT RECEPTACLE G% GROUND FAULT RECEPTACLE a CLOM RECEPTACLE GFI - -- - - -- RDOR RECEPTACLE ------------------------------------ �� ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 4-= ,- --= P --�' cEMMRG RECEPTACLE _-- r M E WING CONDMON Ap , _i Glib ♦/ Ll ------- om ___ ___^_____ _ __ ___ r _______�____________ _________________ '\ c' Aq -------------- , 9-1 , 1 ' " a iL _ Dt� '�'MC�OU� cbitects 374Ca wm%cd,SD'9e M M naclwft D022n10 -r' CL o rr— IJ /�_ - Tdepbooc (617)422-0952 - -- t '- ' i, Q ' FM®L'k (617)422-0962 Gn $ 'b --L -- --- sum Ricidem io1mRoad .AM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECOND FLOOR EIECTRICN- AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN Dmi%scdc thr = V4 PrgecE Nmbw. 01012 �1 SECOND FLOOR ELECTRICAL AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN JULY 17 2002 a A 7O2 •i Ift..........rti.«.., AO ... AL 1 Z w w v LVACM 4)'//7A/ AL If —�' 3�f ►bS1 ►� aoe rr7� ,a r /00.91, .'. tA3ACaes•..,,, w 17 AL ; 211ACR6sA is '2010; 276oeo� 'J'� d�'•e7 G• S�a' 27.Wk N i 3 •M l 21429 1 1.92 Q s � j � 8 iao.cs � u - ��>r.r7\+' _ �1 P" tf�icvs.A„•„ t ' �'�n'27^�071 'v7ttt[7-Aalvy� titUSY � 1 2�260'� 4O.if \ � g' p 4 E EtC4f•11'[- •1 sl. t M 2 Fig 0oS �y / _ ? 22l.2t ► 1yL•r. � Is Z; r.f,•.A,c-pec $ o� 2ao. g 216/of R 22o.cz 1419id% �w 21 ► �Nuza C2 • bb r e y. o gysL0 4 g f4i �p � » aR000� �. 18 d 1 �' •r 2 ` 243MI w 27,,2701 o^ F��hE� . \ xS h � 241AC6J�8f .�� /�At. ii �� �' fi � �, �Ai a f•,� 23 x : Y y2 n 22 {al V `•�/ ?, Y Lei ti 241M �\ h W' 24c7ol '�/4 ezAr t N I/7•�i /� 1 �x �� \ -N c- •w 4 247Ac aea. It : IL � dN� .ld UPLAND' j,sAcatyf. ,� / _ MAILSN•10.14 �• A. eI co °.q s 'C: L �� J.r a D op4caw V ''f y 46 4416 H. of t / BARNSTABLB . bE A % sci ' RECIS77ty OF t)Qtte �.��� dr•/ Am 3— Al ��:' ItECORDF.D PLAN tom.. N vol 8AeNS7AaL�, til.4S& P6tOP[Rry CW LA PEA CF P KNIT SCAI ,. ,� LU 1. Mawr 9 jtjNl t'1949•- • rza7� ll ' I{ Utility Stockade Fence N 12 Pole -- 15 Robert Alb /14 / \ Cath , \ 49,17»E Book 2900 PageMY- e 146 Basin 18 / / / o Catch 0 a° 19 17 _ / / ® •-*� 11 l Flood/ R Basin ,, ............ (/ �............... Post do �•. o en e A ••/..........., � >/ F c r 1 0 Yd Fromo�M Zone a ao, Stone 4 .0' / ................ / Scale Patio: "" O W \ ' / / '_ ... ............15 Setback Line i / '_.i/ 10 ............. / 19 Lawn - / � � \ \ /'•• �/ � // 1 Sewer /cr \\ � ` " �� Lawn l •.KL ° / Manhole r --- o� VV �' o / Utility \ / 2 .61 \ 5° / :tipo •.�e;\o °doe Pole / o rain . ��� Qosi // 11 P1pe Sao^ \• �o \ \ / / °�z •�3WF3 N / . j "y p ' \ ,0s ` \ 100' / J°� WF4 ok (0h ° \ 9 l- a � \ WFS o � 1 50 lot, :t' / 5 _ � / l / Sewer /<1F6 `� / QS Manhole / c r�ey 9� 1 Metal kost W 5 J; ° / // / / / / / // 7 WF77 d o oGrossco /•. / /Lawn / f r Blond ° //Metal Post / / // / / / Wetland Flags v>: \ C // / / Placed by ENSR Lawn o` Q / / /.• // / / p WF8 10 Concrete Q / o !Steps / 0 f Shrubs / _c jVS 9 Cu • 6Y,•re #J.t�lity Pole / Coercrete � / Bound 1 11 0 Found ' Lawn / � .:� ( � • 001-1 Benchmark / ` ` _ // l cry // :� /W11 S rk, in Pavement 18 / _- a Sp irk Utility � EIe��` ,,r; 19.10, / Pole � N:�..a/0� 29 0�y Elevation 12 Is designated as the V , F Base Flood Elevation for the / ° 100 Year Flood Zone by FEMA 'lipter �0� , O ates w i �° IWF-12 v . 1 / (( p'� . � �,`` ?' / Grass ° V.����`RICHARDR. Islond 3 LHEUREUX V q 97;"s / /-OA Sewer ` No.34312 lh / /rStEa`�° ,� C p 16P ' / s14 ,. 15 00 o\ea / `-�✓�-- 1 15 14 . Trtle: PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR: Notes/Revision: SITE PLAN o o � HA]EZRIET DUONO The property line information shown was compiled Sullivan Engineering, Inc. �ap��� rn EXISTING CONDITIONSfrom available record information and does not `D AT PO Box 659 7 Parker Road .13 DEERHILL DRIVE represent. an on the round survey. — Osterville, MA 02655 Osterville MA 02655 P 9 10 KENT ROAD HO-HO-KUS, NJ 07423 (508)428-3344 (508)428-3115 fax (508)420-3994 (508)420-3995 fax The topography and deto� shown was obtained o BARNSTABLE, MA by conventional survey methods. N 20 0 10 20 40 80 Field: WHK/MDH Draft: MOH Date: Scale: Comp.: MDH Review: RLH The datum used is NGVD '29, May 23, 200 = 20 .Pro j # Drawing # .C48JG1.DWG ; i ' 1 ♦ti? ..�~ tsrs s� { '�+ �1�Ts:►S. L L��,.,i� I ❑ / \ • ! _ ! 15 Robert N F /14 ------ / / �12 \ _ / E Alberts / h C \ / O �3�49')7"' ,� Book 2900 P19e 146 / Catcin h :100 CBasin gCatch 1 ( 19 1711BaSln / one ..•L/ EAl 0 FloO ngFencCsto be Re Ye From FEMA Mop S�Landscape Plan Placed i/ / / Scoled - _•� ,w.C`', ., '�.y � " � :}' � W � � I f ' / �'.r• 15' SetboLine / • �-/ _ �/ ., 'J.. • LOC'[.TS �1 •. �•ti O f T_ k i 10 _ _ _ . O •O E LS ,•• c� 19 Lawn t� / 1000 Gallon D rywell w/3 of Stone / .. Nw• r I / ewa R 4 • - + U 1 for Driv y rmofiwith Ve De g 6 / 3 I Of presslon for Dr alnate overflow e �, / / O Sealer "• . �} • 1. n •� p C �f}; IB o Lawn \.�� �C // Manhole �•np• :0• P nds► - ,.{ `, cQ �w /Q `�ei / �?� ,� �j`t`�-y c�eZb, i O �e �� �u � � o .._ � � � � � ��� d f F1^ovn•;�,*.�' � '\ / •�S�'��1'���' '�\ova -� �e ) / �WF1 Vq U. V� 0 :. N of •. Cf� '/o��1egr�o , \ &Lo / / Drain // / WF2 p' •1 „ •o tJ ^1 / ' lr p5t I1 Pipe Quo- —� WFJ Printed from TOM @1998 W*ffky rer Pmduetions(www.to .com) N O � \ I r / �rvv \ , 100' f / / e AF4 LOCUS PLAN o ,00r ��ot¢(\� 19 0,� �,� \/ ( f o / / E 0 Qo Assessors Map 280 lrcP q 3`°cce� I� G ""� �1�°J� _ \ \ \ / �9e o f / 50' ,45 Parcel35 Zoning:RF-1 Setbacks: Front: 30' oR�F� /v�o . ,� f l / f ( / / Side: 15 cy ,�, °a f1 / wer 9 / / / Rear: 15' onhole ny Ground Water Protection Zone: AP WF7 Gross o ct e / Lawn / Island Wetland Flags Placed by ENSR Lawn �I / / l / / WF8 1000 Gallon Drywell w/3 of Stone / / i for Drivewny Runoff with Vegetated Depression for Dralmoge overflow f '1 / / 1 Concrete /Steps ft Shrubs1- 7 I ( �• / / / // WFg BAH Fnd ` / WF10 }\OF / / Lawn ., 1 -V . .,t. en ch m ark / / /W11 pike in Pavement Elevation = 19.10' N.G.V.D. 1929 / / — _ � f � � / � VJSSDPLANSUBMi'fTALs1i�YT / / \ � � Elevation 12 is designated as the RE y Base Flood Elevation for the 100 Year Flood Zone by FEMA sm. / 0 "ooP J / 13 APPi1GAM•SNAM H 0n O �P�r // W Gates W e�C� WF12 / dt' e U o� NOTE: Sewer and Water lines shall be constructed ico9 R ere rli�scrLoc�+nor1: 17 cross o� / of class 150 pressure pipe and shall be pressure , / / e tested to assure water tightness. / Island This project has al=AX en le•ued an Order of Conditions 0 // tiece�°Q / Sewer WF13 CheekOos 16 / °0a `P Manhole 01t / Qoc V` wF14 Directions to Site: From Hyannis,take Route 28 toward Centerville;Take a right onto Order of Conditions not� 0 15 Op \ea / -- Phinney's Lane and follow to Route 6A; Take a left onto Route 6A and then take a right Revised per old Kings Highway Request 07/09/02 onto Rendezvous Lane; At the fork in the road stay to the left and then go straight onto 'Ibis plan wW be considered on 14 Revised Mr Architect's Request 10/01/01 Kent Road; The house is the first one on the right. D.a - Revision 1 Revised Work Limit per ConCom's Request Date:07/25/01 Title: PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR: Notes/Revision: SITE PLAN The property line information shown was compiled C�apC��L � HARRIET BUONO p p y . PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Sullivan Engineering, Inc. from available record information and does not CD AT Po Box 659 7 Parker Road 13 DEERHILL DRIVE represent• an on the ground survey. Osterville, MA 02655 Osterville MA 02655 HO-HO-KUS, NJ 07423 10 KENT ROAD (508)428-3344 (508)428-3115 fax (508)420-3994 (508)420-3995 fax The topography and deta-17 shown was obtained o BARNSTABLE, MA by conventional survey methods. 20 0 10 20 4.0 8o Field: WHK/MDH Draft: MDH ,JO ' The datum used is NGVD 29, Date: May 23, 2009 Scale: 20, _ �•., a � :: , mp.. :�.. .:�. Co MDH Review: RLH y = �,�� :. _ ��.:� .,,. ::s. ..,z Proj. # Drawing # C483G1.DWG i I t z ` 1 F 14 Istcin 12 5Rob ai \ \ o i4 ' " Book 2900 Poge�14 /1 - O 8 / / s /� h oe CatchO I 1g 17 _BasinW '� �, , J E�stin ear Flood ZonMcap t g fences to be Re p0 From FEMA/ �►t See Land plat / ScaledQ , \ S is — — — scape Planed �'f ` ` ' _ Sets L � — , 10 . -�-__: �. • �. ♦ �. Lawn ! Dr7w n w/3 or . .. _ _ y ��O \\ Q�c �/ for Driveway — � � • _ 19 �� / Q 'U I \ \ � ► � eway Rmroffwith Ves �O / —1 ` Pr-d-for Driltuse Overflow 6 'r Sewer ♦ O S New\1-1 2 1 i Lawn l �`" oK Oa Lawn k / Manhole C;�' 0 / Story towelling 1 cam' S . / a ' 1�9 1. yg� $4'S�y��4y d oe > �/ !io / / Drain nr2 '� .. f , '° �`' �50t*� \ ��� / ` 'f .• osti / / 11 Pipe JL b I \ \ / Printed Som TOPO!®1998 FVildfloa u Prodwtions(www.to .cow + /� / �Q� \ ` \ 100, / / �(�� YYF 4 LOCUS PLAN c , �° got ti46 19 i I o / / Po r. i 9 tt'� p� o \ \ I of i G i, V O Assessors Ma 280 tp e '\ / e P O 9 � � Parcel35 i'` ��� g�� i / / 50 (�a WF5 Zoning:RF-1 Setbacks: Front: 30' Side: 15' I l / / wer IW6 Rear: 15' g I /-00, holeGround Water Protection Zone:AP \� 0 9 Age / �I °rch // / / / / WF7 Grass o arc.e / / Lawn \ .. -w,� 'EAR Island �I h /. r / / Wetland Flags :Ali Of n r �. YULl3111~il o / / / R;CNARD ;, 1 ' 1Tlg e, / / / b y ENSR 1. Lawn nI j/ /./ / / / 10 v t i iE13 rt�UX t,+ :, _ 1000 Ganon Drywen w/3 of Stone " a iyo.34372 �;s for Driveway RmroffwMh Vegetated / Depression for Drainage Overflow / < F Concrete Steps Shrubs I / / / WF9 , r -0 FBdH + / 11 O /W1 0 Lawn /— �` • �, 12 /WF11 i �• / _ Be chmark n _ / I OCT — Spike in Pavement 18 `* '�� Elevation = 19.10' / I N.G.V.D. 1929 l Elevation 12 is designated as the - " VNID PLAN SVD11rrfAL SEW � / Base Flood Elevation for the \° / Fo' / / y 100 Year Flood Zone by FEMA,,. 3 5 / of �-- 1 0 IN later 2 2 2IPPL wrS NA1r� H err,e\ i�vale o // e�,� w Gates / F wF12 NOTE: S !I / w 1 Qo� ewer and Water lines shall be constructed PROMMUXATetl: I�g Ren4e z dm>S LqhQ_ // g0 / of class 150 pressure pipe and shall be pressure 1 Grass tested to assure water tightness. . / Island / �a Ms project b+u d ':._h „ 9s,ed an Order of Coodidm Sewer /" v OR Ca.dcOw 16 / \ooaF //Manhole WF13 wF14 Directions to Site: From Hyannis,take Route 28 toward Centerville;Take a right onto Order of Co"dom not yrt d 0 15 a / I Phinney s Lane and follow to Route 6A; Take a left onto Route 6A and then take a right 0 e wF15 ___ __.. _ _ __..• onto Rendezvous Lane;At the fork in the road stay to the left and then go straight onto This plan will be oontidered oa Dow Revised per Architect's Request Date: 10/01/01 14 Kent Road The house is the first one on the right. Revisin"1 Revised Work Limit r ConCom's Request Date:07/25/01 ' Title: PREPARED BY. PREPARED FOR: 'Notes/Revision: SITE PLAN cn HARRIET BUONO The property line information shown was compiled PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Sullivan ]Engineering, Inc. vap�SSuu from available record information and does not Cb PO Box 659 7 Parker R:;ad 13 DEERRILL DRIVE represent. an on the ground survey. + AT Osterville, MA 02655 Osterville MA 02655 HO—I3O-KUS, NJ 07423 lu 10 KENT ROAD (508)428-3344 (508)428-3115 fax (508)420-3994 (508)420-3995 fax The topography and deta� shown was obtained o BARNSTABLE, MA by conventional survey methods. N 20 0 10 20 Oro 8o Field: WHK/MDH Draft: MDH The datum used is NGVD '29, Date: Scale: Comp.: MDH Review: RLH May 23, 2001 1 " 20' o .Pr i y Drawing J # 9 # C483G1.DWG �� � I