Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0058 SHEPERDS WAY
Wi All 10 Kra m UF list 41--�Okilloriml V 91 V Aw, MR's saw q vS, IgA T7irff",�,N C-4yr, .h, 5116 OWN Mqt P%MO� 'Nli mu .......... Vv, "a'��VC 01 % MR NUN' to 1 kWORM v ,,TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Map„ Parcel Application# - (P Health Division Conservation Division Permit# Tax Collector Date Issued = Treasurer Application F Planning Dept. Permit Fee ►� Date Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board Historic-OKH Preservation/Hyannis Project Street Address J �'ei2 e e- .1, o' Village X 4 r', r fc Owne ./-i Address Telephone Permit Request �� rT �'�/ f//"��' 7a t/,,&e,s Square feet: 1st floor:existing proposede?�O 2nd floor:existing proposed Total new Zoning District Flood Plain Groundwater Overlay 1 Project Valuation --d Construction Type Lot Size Grandfathered: ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, attach supporting documentation. Dwelling Type: Single Family Two Family ❑ Multi-Family(#units) Age of Existing Structure 19-c-u Historic House: ❑Yes ❑No On Old King's Highway: ❑Yes ❑No Basement Type: ❑Full ❑Crawl ❑Walkout ❑Other Basement Finished Area(sq.ft.) Basement Unfinished Area(sq.ft) Number of Baths: Full:existing new Half:existing new Number of Bedrooms: existing new Total Room Count(not including baths):existing new First Floor Room Count / Heat Type and Fuel: ❑Gas ❑Oil ❑Electric ❑Other Central Air: ❑Yes ❑No Fireplaces: Existing New Existing wood/coal stove: ❑Yes ❑No Detached garage:❑existing ❑new size Pool:❑existing ❑new size Barn:❑existing ❑new size Attached garage:❑existing ❑new size Shed:❑existing ❑new size Other: Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization ❑ Appeal# Recorded.❑ �-- -- — - Commercial ❑Yes ❑No If yes, site plan review# Current Use Proposed Use BUILDER INFORMATION Name ��� �"`�� `� p Tele hone Number 5��� 7 '3 Cr Address' - ie� t �el License# ��, �� Home Improvement Contractor# 16 7�5 Worker's Compensation# 5-3 / S3If`c5 o—oL bl- u,.c ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RES dLTING FRODATHIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO SIGNATURE DATE -95 0 i r g FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PERMIT NO. s `DATE ISSUED MAP/PARCEL NO. p � ADDRESS VILLAGE r OWNER ti - y I DATE OF INSPECTION: t FOUNDATION r FRAME INSULATION '1 W K FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL: ROUGH FINAL PLUMBING: ROUGH FINAL GAS: ROUGH FINAL i FINAL BUILDING ' DATE CLOSED OUT ASSOCIATION PLAN NO. t noises Double 1-3/4" x 11-1/4" VERSA-LAM® 2.0 3100 SP Roof Beam1RB01 BC CALC@)9.3 Design Report-US 1 span No cantilevers 0/12 slope Thursday,August 24, 2006 09:59 Build 047 File Name: BC CALC Project Job Name: Description: Dormer Beam Address: Lot 26 Sheppard's Way Specifier: City, State,Zip: Barnstable, MA Designer: Joe Madera Customer: Peter Johnson Company: Shepley Wood Products Code reports: ESR-1040 Misc: Additional Beam 12 1 if��/ice � i � iiiiiiimr �yraci ti; � i�c a aQ c s � � 12-00-00 3 BO,3-1/2" 131,3-1/2" DL 1146 Ibs DL 1146 Ibs SL 2160 Ibs SL 2160 Ibs Total Horizontal Product Length=12-00-00 Load Summary Live Dead Snow Wind Roof Live Tag Description Load Type Ref. Start End 100% 90% 115% 133% 125% Trib. 1 Standard Load Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 12-00-00 15 30 12-00-00 Controls Summary Value %Allowable Duration Load Case Span Location Disclosure Pos. Moment 9176 ft-Ibs 41.5% 115% 3 1 -Internal Completeness and accuracy of input must End Shear 2629 Ibs 30.6% 115% 3 1 -Left be verified by anyone who would rely on Total Load Defl. U523(0.265") 34.4% 3 1 output as evidence of suitability for Live Load Defl. U800(0.173") 30.0% 3 1 particular application.Output here based 0.265" 26.5% 3 1 on building code-accepted design Max Defl. Span/Depth 0.26 5% 1 properties and analysis methods. p P Installation of BOISE engineered wood products must.be in accordance with %Allow %Allow current Installation Guide and applicable Bearing Supports Dim.(L x W) Value Support Member Material building codes.To obtain Installation Guide BO Post 3-1/2"x 3-1/2" 3306 Ibs 37.2% 36.0% Spruce-Pine-Fir or ask questions,please call B1 Post 3-1/2"x 3-1/2" 3306 Ibs 37.2% 36.0% Spruce-Pine-Fir (800)232-0788 before installation. BC CALC®,BC FRAMER@),AJST1A, Cautions ALLJOISTO,BC RIM BOARD- BCIO, BOISE GLULAM- SIMPLE FRAMING Column at Bearing BO analyzed for bearing only, column analysis has not been performed. SYSTEMO,VERSA-LAM®,VERSA-RIM Column at Bearing B1 analyzed for bearing only, column analysis has not been performed. PLUS@,VERSA-RIM@), VERSA-STRANDO,VERSA-STUD@ are Notes trademarks of Boise Wood Products, Design meets Code minimum (U180)Total load deflection criteria. L.L.C. Design meets Code minimum (U240) Live load deflection criteria. Design meets arbitrary (1") Maximum load deflection criteria. Member Slope=0, consider drainage. Connection Diagram b d—� a c a minimum=2" c=7-1/4" b minimum= 3" d= 12" Member has no side loads. Connectors are: 16d Sinker Nails Page 1 of 1 I Town of Bamstable s , 1. Reguktory Sykes . Thomas F.Geifler,Director 0191. Duilftg Division 'tom Perry, Building Commissioner 200 Manz Street, Hy=,;A,MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.m%us Office: 508-862-4038 pax: 508-790-6230 Property Owner.:I ust Complete and. Sign This Section If Using A Builder $as 0Wnc J of the subject prop" hereby authorize - A OA/ to act on'1 behalf; is ail matters relative to work authorized by this burg permit application for: 0 C L® dress of Job) �f Date Priz+t Iv ame Q:FbRM�;O�rIN"r.RPERtr'�SSION I I I — �2o'WiDE sY ® N 9 CA.° 3 / 4 1 34�4 ,S i EX tSriAla rP i L e r 'eE,ZG 2&ao / 2. l3 iI�2Es � q I �o I certify that this located CERTIFIED PLOT PLAN in flood hazard zone C (outside the 500 year flood) as identified by the Depart- LOCATION ment of Housing .and Urban Development(HUD) . SCALE . ..! 30.... .DATE Date . N T cQ 6 of PLAN REFERENCE CEP 9�y� 5A10W ��.. N ON I-AV D Coin RDy . . . .F... .. ... ... .. . .. . . Re SIrandLSru�^ve r .. .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . r. . .. . . . . �Es ISTLQ��J . .. . . . . . . . . . . S��MAL LAB S . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . I CERTIFY THAT THE 4X S4MYG',.'��uNDAT/o,}/ I certify to its title insurance company SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS LOCATED ON THE GROUND that there are no visible encroachments AS SHOWN HEREON. or easements except as shown and that this plan was prepared under my immediate .T pZc�L supervision. DATE . ....Y. . ... .L REGISTERED LAND SURVE R T TOWN OF BARNSTAB UILDING PERMIT APPLICATION COP Map Parcel �d �``"" reeflm�it �HealthrDivision---° Date Issued P q4r Conservation Division /G �b„ 0,�,P&61 /Do Fee 'a O 5 3•/2-4 65- Tax Collector 1 111010L) t�t��w- Pv�3u' -/�o Application Fee �,/ozmo Zv�e Treasurer Planning Dept. SEPT�6 §gkjl ,,, BE INSTA LEID ill A'fp ,;'a;'IrE Date Definitive Plan Approved by�111'reservation/Hyannis nin��Board AV,p�owvedl By Historic-OKH U� ENVIROMdSE ND _.. TOWN �. 3�r Project Street Address /� c��_ �vc� G%'✓► 1�� L' l� �� Village Owner /�GI �fill', �^� � 1,� Address Aa Telephone �crr''T �'no ;. Permit Request /S ©� S uare f t: 1st floor: existing propos�do 2nd floor: existin proposed Total new aluation C 0o� ' e'c) Zoning District Flood Plain Groundwater Overlay Construction Type R` e- Ir Lot Size cP,A Cam%= Grandfathered: ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, attach supporting documentation. Dwelling Type: Single Family U Two Family ❑ Multi-Family(#units) Age of Existing Structure Historic House: ❑Yes ❑ No On Old King's Highway: 21es ❑No Basement Type: 2 Full ❑Crawl ❑Walkout ❑Other Basement Finished Area(sq.ft.) Basement Unfinished Area(sq.ft) Number of Baths: Full: existing new Half:existing new Number of Bedrooms: existing new Total Room Count(not including baths): existing new First Floor Room Count Heat Type and Fuel: 3/Gas ❑Oil ❑ Electric ❑Other Central Air: ❑Yes Ir'No Fireplaces: Existing New Existing wood/coal stol e: ❑li Flo Detached garage:0 existing ❑a�new size Pool: ❑existing ❑new size Barn:❑existin I O negsize.-_ Attached garage:❑existing knew size Ll � Shed:0 existing ❑new size Other: < '— r cn Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization 0 Appeal# Recorded 0 w Commercial 0 Yes 0 No If yes, site plan review# Current Use Proposed Use BUILDER INFORMATION �`-a� � 3 7 ® Name �" � � � h�a� Telephone Number L 33 Address Z C, a c 14 mot License# c Home Improvement Contractor# Worker's Compensation#WCz.5-21c5-a/FCC5-0S-0 1 c-1 U/ ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO SIGNATURE DATE ti f FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PERMIT NO. DATE ISSUED ' r. MAP/PARCEUNO. ADDRESS VILLAGE OWNER DATE OF INSPECTION: /s FOUNDATION . FRAME INSULATION L'/ FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL: ROUGH FINAL PLUMBING: ROUGH J FINAL GAS: ROUGH ! FINAL i FINAL BUILDING DATE CLOSED OUT ASSOCIATION PLAN NO. f) �r Lw ��tHE ryo� Town of Barnstable Building Department - 200 Main Street BARNSTABLE, * H ya n n i s, MA 02601 MASS. i639� A�� (508) 862-4038 rFo WIPE Certi fi cate of 0owpancy Application Nwber: 89171 CO Number: 20070179 Parcel ID. 258013003 CO Issue Date: 08/08/07 Location: 58SHWERDS WAY Zoning Classification: RESIDENCE F-1 DISTRICT Village: BARNSTABLE Gen Contractor: PETER E. JOHNSON Permit Type: RC00 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY RES Comments: Bd1dingDepartna, Sigiahre Date Sigied O?Nx n BARNS�'ABLE BUTLI3I.:NG--PERMIT PARCEL ID 258 013 003 GLODAGE,11D ADDRESS 58 SHEPEP.,DS WAY PHONE trAkNSTABLE ZIP I I..LUD LOT 26 BLOCK LOT SI'7E � DBA, DEVEL OPHENT. DX STRICT PERMIT 89,.1,71 DESCRIPTION CORSTRUCT NEW HOUSE PERMIT TAPE BUILD TITLE.,,. - NEW RESIDENTIAL BLD(4 PMT c6__RTArTORS: PETER E. JOHNSON Department of ARCM?TtE`OTS' Regulatory Services, TOTAL FEES: $2, 150.00 BOND $.00 211E '--CONSTRUCTION COSTS i01 SINGLE._FAM HOME DETACHED I. PRIVATE ,'.,0� 16 ED MA'S y, BUILDING DIVISION BY ate•.. (� �-- . DATE+ °ISSUED -/12,/19/2005 EXPIRATION DATE THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET,ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF, EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY.EN- CROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION.STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF FOUR CALL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND FERMI APPLICABLE, SEPARATE THIS CARD KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION 1.FOUNDATIONS FOOTINGS HAS BEEN MADE.WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCU- PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR 2. PRIOR TO COVERING ING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND MECH- (READY TO LATH). PANCY IS REQUIRED, SUCH BUILDING SHALL NOT BE ANICAL INSTALLATIONS. 3.INSULATION. OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. 4.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. POST THIS CARD ® IT IS VISIBLEFROM STREET BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS o y? -O!p 2 �SWII��Ir"a 2 f 2 �%a` U 9 �� O`� I(lp ATING INSPECTION APPROVALS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT G'hs �C) 1 2 S 8�[7 7' BOARD OF HEALTH OTHER: - SITE PLAN RE IEW APPROVAL WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CON- INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS THE INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE STRUCTION WORK IS NOT'STARTED WITHIN SIX CARD CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY VARIOUS STAGES OF CONSTRUC- MONTHS OF DATE'THE PERMIT IS ISSUED AS TELEPHONE OR WRITTEN NOTIFICA- TION. NOTED ABOVE. TION. '" �fw 7S 9 tti Town of Barnstable Building Department - 200 Main Street BARNSTABLE. Hyannis, MA 02601 9 MASS i639. . (508) 862-4038 RFD MA'S A Certificate of Occupancy Temporary Application 89171 CO Number: 20070095 Parcel ID: 258013003 CO Issue Date: 05/22/07 Location: 58 SHEPERDS WAY Zoning Classification: RESIDENCE F-1 DISTRICT Owner: AUSTIN, JOHN BRADBURY & Proposed Use: DEVELOPABLE LAND 2801 GIRARD AVE EVANSTON, IL 60201 Village: BARNSTABLE Gen Contractor: PETER E. JOHNSON Permit Type: RTCO RES TEMP CERT OF OCCUPANCY Comments: 60 DAY TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. v 07/22/07 Building Depart at Signature Date Signed Expiration Date Ca r r I em'h I : Al T.)3 i i LOT r.vA.- k 3 � 51�,''� •y-� —, lr;(t�'V "1t�5"� w4t Lt '!�i YR! — 4�... +x t, :. :_ t` Lfie_ LR1r`3 �.v�1 ut;N sylf; kej\t. ' c 1 t1 3 t �} t : 'fa, TYPE r71 YpJ .. r , Iy:{.�'.to .lJ u-+V..� i "l.T.3 ..3F ss�.iI�r i�.A' . I ..a13. .3, i l.LFE,. :J l� Department of Regulatory Services + 'f $2, .160 00 mat! F'i'.� -Y)L e'. �1..rrL�5{.�d7r,.�...!_j i.. :. :...��;.ti IF.l;;'SYi.ii: Ip��i . • • BARNSTABLE, MASS. I i BUILDING DIVISION BY .. 1! "~ll i-j'tl f'f i. ,-�L!('11.�•'..t s.'!'�"\i _�J,:r-�•.:-1 a:e I THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET, ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF, EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY. EN- CROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION.STREET OR I ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OFTHIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. i MINIMUM OF FOUR CALL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND WHERE APPLICABLE,. SEPARATE 1.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS THIS CARD KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR I 2. PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS HAS BEEN MADE.WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCU- ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND MFOR I (READY TO LATH). PANCY IS REQUIRED, SUCH BUILDING SHALL NOT BE ANICAL INSTALLATIONS. ECH- 3.INSULATION. OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. 4.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. I BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS . n PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS i v 3 C a O� 1 ktATING INSPECTION APPROVALS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT C� GXS �� wp I 2 p BOARD OF HEALTH OTHER: - SITE PLAN RE IEW APPROVAL f i WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CON- INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS THE INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE STRUCTION WORK IS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX CARD CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY VARIOUS STAGES OF CONSTRUC- MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED AS TELEPHONE OR WRITTEN NOTIFICA- TION. NOTED ABOVE. TION. I I 4B � � Er�� ���� � � ,� 1�� ����/ � � � U G�'�� --�-' _ EDWARD C. KELLEY REG. LAND SURVEYOR CUMMAQUID , MASS. 02637 Tel. 1-508-362-5079 Fax. 1-508-362-2266 May 22, 2007 Ref: 58 Sheperd's Way Barnstable I certify that the existing dwelling located at 58 Sheperd's Way, Barnstable owned by John Austin conforms to the 35 foot height requirement. The existing sub-grade at the foundation is 9� inchs below the top of the foundation and is 35.04 feet to the peak. The top of the foundation is 34.24 below thepeak of the roof. Finish grade will be 6" belowthe top of the foundation at elev. 34.74. /ZaoF O�f�IL r 9677v L)(IST/ti/G tow// �jzFIDE Lan/? '97- CAST �`T/D of eV157/n/G 77fI5 /al2E� / S 62Abt� TD TY/E Piz��oosc r OFC�/, ,� 1 M" E. KELLEY w No. 26106 L L I A �OpTMETp Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services r u r r • BAMS'TABLE, MASS. g Thomas F. Geiler, Director �p s639. rF©39 6, Building Division Thomas Perry, CBO Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 May 22, 2007 i Peter E. Johnson 7 Penelope Lane Cotuit, MA 02648 RE: 58 Shepards Way, Barnstable Dear Mr. Johnson: In order to issue a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy this office needs verification from a registered surveyor that the building is within the height limitation required by the Old Kings Highway Certificate of Appropriateness other building/site issues will be addressed in a follow-up letter. ieLrel Thomas Perry, CBO� Building Commissioner 10/14/05 FRI 12:40 FAX 1 508 428 8835 Peter E. Johnson a 002 'down ®f Barnstable Regulatory Services $ Thomas F.CeHer,D ireetor Building]division Tom Ferry, BuRding Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hywmi2,MA 02601 wwwaowa.barnstable,maxs Office, 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 Property Ommer Musa Complete and Sign This Section If Using A Builder � CNQ►4T 1 N S = CLQ A _,as Own of the subject property w V hetebp authorize Tew� C.—Mollms to act-on W beha3fS in all ma&n relative to work authorized by this bustling permit application for: 0 P-T'd A R Lo-t AL,d!Ea 0 z4i C 4 dress of job) _ Iq OcreDE42 too 5 si natuxoof etc Date c.H,n�s7�N� IC'A-v� Print Name Q:FORA!l5:01xlNE?RPERMISSY(7N T"` The Town of Barnstable MAS Department of Health Safety and Environmental Services MASS.S. P M"'' Building Division 367 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 508.862-4038 508.790-6230 PLAN REVIEW Owner: 1014ti 4 FR©V4,►Map/ParceI: 2 01.1 �Project Address: S T wJ4Y Builder: P,L-7-C—k The following items were noted on reviewing: L L c L E I/ATI oar S TO • c o+M p L 774 09-LL- SrKuc �p co .w 1 T74 � " y Reviewed by:_ Date: V �p Idavit of Substantial cial Interest CJ�` srr, I of e on oath depose and state as follows:. 6'o 13-- GG 3 applicant for a building permit for the property locate t ap P cel 1, I am an app ' e, u. , , 4 . The address of the property is �� ���� V V'/ % legal or equitable interest in the real property whichs the f 2. I have g subject of the building permit application which is identified in paragraph 1 above. 3. Within In the last tw elve months from today's date, which is A �°S' "�sthe following individuals or entities have had a I% or greater legal or equitable interest in the real property which is the subject of the building permit application which is Identified in paragraph 1 above: Name Address have had 4. Within the last twelve months, from in the followingch is I properties which have been. a 1% or greater legal or equitable interest the subject of a building permit application: Map/Parcel Address I have submitted building permit applications for 5. Within this calendar year, .--- property in which I have a 1% or greater legal or equitable interest. 6. Within the last ten days, I have submitted _ building permit applications for property in which I have a 1% or greater legal or equitable interest. 7. Within this month, I have submitted building permit applications for property in which I have a 1% legal or equitable interest. g, Within this month, I have received building permits for property in which I have a 1% legal or equitable interest. Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury, this _day of 200_. 1 2001-0omaffin ..n n-rr=PY/AFFIDAVIT ti j Permit Number MECcheck Compliance Report Checked By/Date Massachusetts Energy Code MECcheckSoftware Version 3.4 Release la Data filename:C:\Program Files\Check\MECcheck\Peter Johnson-Lot 26 Shepherds Way.cck TITLE:Austin Residence CITY:Barnstable STATE:Massachusetts HDD: 6137 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 1 or 2 Family,Detached HEATING SYSTEM TYPE:Other(Non-Electric Resistance) DATE: 10/20/05 DATE OF PLANS: 10/20/2005* PROJECT INFORMATION: Lot 26 Shepherds Way Barnstable,MA 02630 COMPANY INFORMATION: Peter Johnson COMPLIANCE:Passes Maximum UA=440 Your Home=363 17.5%Better Than Code Gross Glazing Area or Cavity Cont. or Door Perimeter R-Value R-Value U-Factor UA Ceiling 1:Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 1152 30.0 0.0 40 .Wall 1: Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 2660 19.0 0.0 134 Window 1: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 299 0.340 102 Door 1: Solid 40 0.320 13 Door 2:Glass 80 0.320 26 Floor 1:All-Wood Joist/Truss:Over Unconditioned Space 420 30.0 0.0 14 Floor 2:All-Wood Joist/Truss:Over Unconditioned Space 732 19.0 0.0 34 Boiler 1:Other(Except Gas-Fired Steam), 84 AFUE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans,specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the Massachusetts Energy Code requirements in MECcheckVersion 3.4 Release la and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the MECcheckInspection Checklist. The heating load for this building,and the cooling load if appropriate,has been determined using the applicable Standard Design Conditions found in the Code. The HVAC equipment selected to heat or cool the building shall be no greater than 125%of the `design load as specified in Sections 780CMR 1310 and J4.4. Builder/Designer Date r Austin House, Lot 26 Sheperds Way, Barnstable MA Loewen Window Specs September 8, 2005 (revised Sept.9/Mike Alfaro) LOEWEN White aluminum-clad windows and doors, Heat Smart System 1 Door units SDL 3/4" muntins 2 across 3 down (as shown on drawings) Windows Double Hung, SDL 3/4" Profile 2 over 2 (see drawings) 4" spread mull with covers between windows in sets (see drawings) exception: I Awning window (as specified below), no muntins All windows to be provided with screens Hardware Double Hung Sash Lock and Awning hardware, White Terrace Door units: TD/FD Meran handle, Antique Brass # on plans Door units 1. Door unit--Living/Dining Room FD2 1521 LAR 2 wide 3 high muntin pattern, R. 0. 61 3/8" x 82" To be ordered from EQUALIZER: French swing doors, white with black hardware. 2A. Door unit--Kitchen/Porch TD1 0720L 2 wide 3 high muntin pattern R. 0. 31 3/4" x 80 3/8" 2B. Door Unit--West Bedroom TD1 0720L 2 wide 3 high muntin pattern R.,0. 31 3/4" x 80 3/8" To be ordered from EQUALIZER: full view traditional screen door white with black hardware Windows 3. Quantity 4--Living Rm. DH2 2026 4" spread mull with cover (4 sets of 2 ganged) R. O. 55 1.2" x 61" 4. Quantity 6--West Bedroom & Garage, South wall DH2 2024 4" spread mull with cover R. 0. 55 1/2" x 57" (6 sets of 2 ganged) 5. Quantity 2--West Bath & South Stair DH1 2024 R. 0. 26 3/16" x 57" 6. Quantity 1--Garage East DH2 2016 4" spread mull with cover (set of 2 ganged) R. 0. 55 12" x 41" 7. Quantity 2--East Bedroom DH3 2024 4" spread mull with covers (set of 3 ganged) R. 0. 84 7/8" x 57" 8. Quantity 9--North side, 1st & 2nd floors, Kitchen west DH 1 2016 R. 0. 26 3/16" x 41" 9. [canceled] C.,,.�y�(u_e..e.&k", n 10. Quantity 1--Attic east AW1 7510A no muntin R. 0. 30 5/16" x 40 3/16" 11. Quantity 2--Attic north & south DH 1 2420 R. 0. 30 3/16" x 49 1/16" Wall thickness: 2 x 6 framing 5/8" or 3/4" exterior sheathing 5/8" drywall interior walls skim coat plaster? f r JOHN B. AUSTIN and CHRISTINE FROULA OKHHDC Application for Lot ##26 Sheperds Way, Barnstable House--New Construction July 29, 2005 Written Dimensions of Austin House for Lot 26 as requested by OKHHD Committee on July 27, 2005 qo<rl 4,0 A B Goal Q. NOA ��� J 74,v s-r- tit vS S4f-& A61RA s WAY, R4to9S7_4t3t ..... .... . .. . : all s _ 3Cin s hi?e Hist9'ic ) ii'ic'<?4lfpi. s : ...:.::.:. .:.. ...::. ......... ........ Kok .,.:.::..... aacb ,.. 7r�nes:...C1 :AA.2:.SEfI.:N6L.Esogc +_TZ�.:.::.cyE TyER N1�7� t..[_y r i0 464 :. r, �,.. '- Fia:z.:._,- GrgL: Gi: 'K ....:.... .: :: . :.. g q� i f ��zza:.a• :��az� �" �....c�,r:.. , ......:.. : .: .. .. .. .. .... . .... TI33�dz=CQFi?R 4 - -- — r� , : :........ , .::: . . . .. .. .: ... 'CQLOR3: �r.�c.;;_?� doa�:; `.:.: �►}��d.°::° lr �E'�:wao�:.:sr: r� ems.. . .:.:..... .... .....:.. ....:.... : ... ....:... 8.. tI�AR3�C�S.i°:'Dt]�$:8::.._.-.:�;::ism..----.-_.:.:.._.�.:::::::..:._ -':":�03DR14:. ::`:}���:•..:.:.:. sill 4iilsld?3oia..ko: NO". row 4okiap.:of ¢hsa - ;. � _°;`Eois,:is.c�:s�.qu�sdLpriu�ii�bitl;=oL•,:�::rDPllpalioa�.;ilo�q:t�tk"•:�;¢u{r,`4dpi�#':ot,;.Eh�Dlok plaai .ZaaOac�ye ' � plan aed�Sa+ttioi►:yl,'iu:�tiie:iyyYi6abla 34 I � J Austin-Froula Pond Field Comparison of Window-Width Changes from Preliminary to Final Elevations Floor/Facade Preliminary Rough Opening Final Rough Opening Difference #3] 1st W-S-E, 49 5/8" for two ganged 55 1/2" 5 7/8" Main House (6" spread mulls) (4" spread mulls) #5] 2nd W, Single: 22 3/16" 26 3/16" 4" Main House and stairway #6] 1st E, 49 5/8" for two ganged. 55 1/2" 5 7/8" Garage (6" spread mull) (4" spread mull) # 7] 2nd S-E, 77 1/16" for three ganged 84 7/8" 7 13/16" Garage (6" spread mulls) (4" spread mulls) # 8]North Side Unchanged (All of North side,preliminary # 9] cancelled # 101 Attic E 24 7/16" 30 4/16" 5 13/16" # 11] Attic N 24 7/16" 30 3/16" 5 12/16" & S 80iSIF Double 1-3/4" x 11-7/8" VERSA-LAM® 3100 SP Floor Beam\Level 3\D1 BC CALCB 9.3 Design Report-US 1 span I No cantilevers'l,0/12 slope Friday,June 16,2006 10:14 Build 047 File Name: Johnson Austin.BCC Job Name: Austin Description: Level 301 Address: 26 Shepards Way Specifier: be City, State,Zip: , Designer: Customer: Peter Johnson Company: Shepley Wood Products Code reports: ICBO 5512, NER 629 Misc: 'Aw Y Pon ' 10-01-12 BO, 13-3/4" B1,3-1/2" LL 4620 Ibs LL 3903 Ibs DL 1714 Ibs DL 1448 Ibs Total Horizontal Product Length=10-01-12 Load Summary Live Dead Snow Wind Roof Live Tag Description Load Type Ref. Start End 100% 90% 115% 133% 125% Trib. 1 Standard Load Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 10-01-12 40 10 12-00-00 2 Roof Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 10-01-12 30 15 12-00-00 Controls Summary Value %Allowable Duration Load Case Span Location Disclosure Pos. Moment 11233 ft-Ibs 52.8% 100% 1 1 - Internal Completeness and accuracy of input must End Shear 3875 Ibs 48.2% 100% 1 1 -Left be verified by anyone who would rely on Total Load Defl. U656(0.162") 36.6% 1 1 output as evidence of suitability for Live Load Defl. U900(0.118") 40.0% 1 1 particular application.Output here based Max Defl. 0.162" 16.2% 1 1 on building code-accepted design Span/Depth 8.9 n/a 1 properties and analysis methods. P P Installation of BOISE engineered wood products must be in accordance with %Allow %Allow current Installation Guide and applicable Bearing Supports Dim.(L x W) Value Support Member Material building codes.To obtain Installation Guide 8 BO Post 13-3/4"x 3-1/2" 6334 Ibs n/a 15.5% Unspecified ( ask questions,please call B1 Wall/Plate 3-1/2"x 3-1/2" 5351 Ibs n/a 51.4% Unspecified 00)232-0788 before installation. BC CALCO, BC FRAMER®,AJS-, Cautions ALLJOISTO,BC RIM BOARD TM, BCIV, BOISE GLULAM- SIMPLE FRAMING Column at Bearing BO analyzed for bearing only,column analysis has not been performed. SYSTEM®,VERSA-LAME),VERSA-RIM PLUS®,VERSA-RIM®, Notes VERSA-STRAND®,VERSA-STUD®are Design meets Code minimum(U240)Total load deflection criteria. trademarks of Boise Wood Products, Design meets Code minimum(U360) Live load deflection criteria. L.L.C. Design meets arbitrary (1") Maximum load deflection criteria. Connection Diagram b d—� a c a minimum=2" c=7-7/8" b minimum=3" d= 12" Member has no side loads. Connectors are: 16d Sinker Nails Page 1 of 1 80iSE- Single 11-7/8" BCI® 90s-2.0 SP Joistli-evel 31D8 BC CALC®9.3 Design Report- US 1 span I No cantilevers'l.0/12 slope Friday,June 16, 2006 10:14 Build 047 16"OCS Non-Repetitive Glued&nailed construction File Name: Johnson Austin.BCC Job Name: Austin Description: Level 308 Address: 26 Shepards Way Specifier: be City, State,Zip: , Designer: Customer: Peter Johnson Company: Shepley Wood Products Code reports: ESR-1336 Misc: Ow / s - .,� ui - au�„�..✓ter ,� ,, i .�„ .✓//.�_.' �. � ,/k�,,,,,✓.:,wF. "• ''_ 23-09-12 BO,2-3/8" B1,2-3/8" LL 635 Ibs LL 635 Ibs DL 159 Ibs DL 159 Ibs Total Horizontal Product Length=23-09-12 Load Summary Live Dead Snow Wind Roof Live Tag Description Load Type Ref. Start End 100% 90% 115% 133% 125% OCS 1 Standard Load Unf.Area (psf) Left 00-00-00 23-09-12 40 10 16" Controls Summary Value %Allowable Duration Load Case Span Location Disclosure Pos. Moment 4627 ft-Ibs 48.4% 100% 1 1 - Internal Completeness and accuracy of input must End Reaction 781 Ibs 54.8% 100% 1 1 -Left be verified by anyone who would rely on Total Load Defl. U422(0.67") 56.9% 1 1 output as evidence of suitability for Live Load Defl. U528(0.536") 91.0% 1 1 particular application.Output here based Max Defl. 0.67" 67.0% 1 1 on building code-accepted design properties and analysis methods. Span/Depth 23.8 n/a 1 Installation of BOISE engineered wood products must be in accordance with %Allow %Allow current Installation Guide and applicable Bearing Supports Dim.(L x W) Value Support Member Material building codes.To obtain Installation Guide BO Wall/Plate 2-3/8"x 3-1/2" 794 Ibs n/a n/a Unspecified or ask questions,please call B1 Wall/Plate 2-3/8"x 3-1/2" 794 Ibs n/a n/a Unspecified (800)232-0788 before installation. BC CALC®,BC FRAMER®,AJSTM, Notes ALLJOIST®, BC RIM BOARD TM BCI®, BOISE GLULAM- SIMPLE FRAMING Design meets Code minimum(U240)Total load deflection criteria. SYSTEM®,VERSA-LAM®,VERSA-RIM Design meets User specified (U480) Live load deflection criteria. PLUS®,VERSA-RIM®, Design meets arbitrary (1") Maximum load deflection criteria. VERSA-STRAND®,VERSA-STUD®are Composite El value based on 23/32"thick sheathing glued and nailed to joist. trademarks of Boise wood Products, L.L.C. Page 1 of 1 noisw Single 14" BCI® 60s-2.0 SP Joisftevel 21D9 BC CALCO 9.3 Design Report-US 1 span I No cantilevers' 0/12 slope Friday,June 16,2006 10:14 Build 047 12"OCS I Non-Repetitive) Glued&nailed construction File Name: Johnson Austin.BCC Job Name: Austin Description: Level 209 Address: 26 Shepards Way Specifier: be City, State,Zip: , Designer: Customer: Peter Johnson Company: Shepley Wood Products Code reports: ESR-1336 Misc: �` mow 23-09-12 BO,2-3/8" B1,2-3/8" LL 476 Ibs LL 476 Ibs DL 119 Ibs DL 119 Ibs Total Horizontal Product Length=23-09-12 Load Summary Live Dead Snow Wind Roof Live Tag Description Load Type Ref. Start End 100% 90% 115% 133% 125% OCS 1 Standard Load Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 23-09-12 40 10 12" Controls Summary Value %Allowable Duration Load Case Span Location Disclosure Pos. Moment 3470 ft-Ibs 46.6% 100% 1 1 - Internal Completeness and accuracy of input must End Reaction 585 Ibs 46.8% 100% 1 1 -Right be verified by anyone who would rely on Total Load Defl. U560(0.505") 42.9% 1 1 output as evidence of suitability for Live Load Defl. L/700(0.404") 68.6% 1 1 particular application.Output here based Max Defl. 0.505" 50.5% 1 1 on building code-accepted design properties and analysis methods. Span/Depth 20.2 n/a 1 Installation of BOISE engineered wood products must be in accordance with %Allow %Allow current Installation Guide and applicable Bearing Supports Dim.(L x W) Value Support Member Material building codes.To obtain Installation Guide 8 BO Wall/Plate 2-3/8"x 2-5/16" 595 Ibs n/a n/a Unspecified ( ask questions,please call B1 Wall/Plate 2-3/8"x 2-5/16" 595 Ibs n/a n/a Unspecified 00)232-0788 before installation. BC CALCO, BC FRAMER@,AJS-, Notes ALLJOISTO,BC RIM BOARD- BCIO, BOISE GLULAMTM SIMPLE FRAMING Design meets Code minimum (U240)Total load deflection criteria. SYSTEMO,VERSA-LAM@,VERSA-RIM Design meets User specified (U480) Live load deflection criteria. PLUS@,VERSA-RIM@, Design meets arbitrary(1") Maximum load deflection criteria. VERSA-STRAND@,VERSA-STUDS are Composite El value based on 23/32"thick sheathing glued and nailed to joist. trademarks of Boise Wood Products, L.L.C. Page 1 of 1 B®1SE- Double 1-3/4" x 11-7/8" VERSA-LAM® 3100 SP Floor Beam\Level 2\D1 O BC CALC®9.3 Design Report-US 1 span No cantilevers' 0/12 slope Friday,June 16, 2006 10:14 Build 047 File Name: Johnson Austin.BCC Job Name: Austin Description: Level 2010 Address: 26 Shepards Way Specifier: be City, State,Zip: , Designer: Customer: Peter Johnson Company: Shepley Wood Products Code reports: ICBO 5512, NER 629 Misc: s 06-01-12 BO,3-1/2" LL 3227 Ibs 61, LL 3326 lbsbs DL 1584 Ibs DL 1610 Ibs SL 1106 Ibs SL 1106 Ibs Total Horizontal Product Length=06-01-12 Load Summary Live Dead Snow Wind Roof Live Tag Description Load Type Ref. Start End 100% 90% 115% 133% 125% Trib. 1 Standard Load Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 06-01-12 40 10 12-00-00 2 wall Unf. Lin. (plf) Left 00-00-00 06-01-12 0 60 n/a 3 attic Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 06-01-12 40 10 12-00-00 4 Roof Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 06-01-12 15 30 12-00-00 5 Header Conc. Pt. (Ibs) Left 03-06-00 03-06-00 653 173 n/a Controls Summary Value %Allowable Duration Load Case Span Location Disclosure Pos. Moment 8357 ft-Ibs 34.2% 115% 2 1 - Internal Completeness and accuracy of input must End Shear -3721 Ibs 40.3% 115% 2 1 - Right be verified by anyone who would rely on Total Load Defl. L/1390 (0.049") 17.3% 2 1 output as evidence of suitability for Live Load Defl. L/1891 (0.036") 19.0% 2 1 particular application.Output here based Max Defl. 0.049" 4.9% 2 1 on building code-accepted design properties and analysis methods. Span/Depth 5.7 n/a 1 Installation of BOISE engineered wood products must be in accordance with %Allow %Allow current Installation Guide and applicable Bearing Supports Dim.(L x W) Value Support Member Material building codes.To obtain Installation Guide 8 BO Post 3-1/2"x 3-1/2" 5918 Ibs n/a 56.8% Unspecified ( ask questions,please call B1 Wall/Plate 3-1/2"x 3-1/2" 6042 Ibs 116.1% 58.0% Spruce-Pine-Fir 00)232-0788 before installation. BC CALC®, BC FRAMER®,AJS-, Cautions ALLJOISTO,BC RIM BOARD- BCI®, BOISE GLULAM- SIMPLE FRAMING Column at Bearing BO analyzed for bearing only, column analysis has not been performed. SYSTEM®,VERSA-LAM®,VERSA-RIM Bearing length at bearing B1 should be at least 4-1/16". PLUS®,VERSA-RIM®, Bearing B1 cannot support a load of 6042 lbs. VERSA-STRAND®,VERSA-STUD®are trademarks of Boise Wood Products, Notes L.L.C. Design meets Code minimum (U240)Total load deflection criteria. Design meets Code minimum(L1360) Live load deflection criteria. Design meets arbitrary (1") Maximum load deflection criteria. Page 1 of 2 BOISE- Double 1-3/4" x 11-7/8" VERSA-LAM® 3100 SP Floor BeamlLevel 2\D10 BC CALC®9.3 Design Report-US 1 span I No cantilevers' 0/12 slope Friday,June 16, 2006 10:14 Build 047 File Name: Johnson Austin.BCC Job Name: Austin Description: Level 2010 Address: 26 Shepards Way Specifier: be City, State,Zip: , Designer: Customer: Peter Johnson Company: Shepley Wood Products Code reports: ICBO 5512, NER 629 Misc: Connection Diagram Disclosure b d Completeness and accuracy of input must be verified by anyone who would rely on a output as evidence of suitability for particular application.Output here based on building code-accepted design c properties and analysis methods. Installation of BOISE engineered wood • products must be in accordance with current Installation Guide and applicable building codes.To obtain Installation Guide or ask questions,please call a minimum=2" c=7-7/8" (800)232-0788 before installation. b minimum= 3" d= 12" Connection design assumes point load is'top-loaded'. For connection design of'side-loaded'point loads, AL CALC®,BC FRAMER®, -,B please consult a technical representative or professional of Record. BOISE ST®, BC RIMBOARD BIND, BOISE GLULAM SIMPLE FRAMING Member has no side loads. SYSTEM®,VERSA-LAM®,VERSA-RIM Concentrated loads are not considered in side load analysis. PLUS®,VERSA-RIM®, Connectors are: 16d Sinker Nails VERSA-STRANDS,VERSA-STUD®are trademarks of Boise Wood Products, L.L.C. Page 2 of 2 noises Double 1-3/4" x 11-7/8" VERSA-LAM® 3100 SP Floor Beam\Level 21D6 BC CALCO 9.3 Design Report- US 1 span No cantilevers' 0/12 slope Friday,June 16,2006 10:14 Build 047 File Name: Johnson Austin.BCC Job Name: Austin Description: Level 206 Address: 26 Shepards Way Specifier: be City, State,Zip: , Designer: Customer: Peter Johnson Company: Shepley Wood Products Code reports: ICBO 5512, NER 629 Misc: 4 3 1 his sf v i�l i r / i \ 08-10-00 BO,3-1/2" B1,3-1/2" LL 3533 Ibs ILL 3533 Ibs DL 1951 Ibs DL 1951 Ibs SL 1325 Ibs SL 1325 Ibs Total Horizontal Product Length=08-10-00 Load Summary Live Dead Snow Wind Roof Live Tag Description Load Type Ref. Start End 100% 90% 115% 133% 125% Trib. 1 Standard Load Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 08-10-00 40 10 10-00-00 2 wall Unf. Lin. (plf) Left 00-00-00 08-10-00 0 80 n/a 3 attic Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 08-10-00 40 10 10-00-00 4 Roof Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 08-10-00 15 30 10-00-00 Controls Summary Value %Allowable Duration Load Case Span Location Disclosure Pos. Moment 13517 ft-Ibs 55.2% 115% 13 1 - Internal Completeness and accuracy of input must End Shear 4834 Ibs 52.3% 115% 2 1 -Left be verified by anyone who would rely on Total Load Defl. U575 (0.175") 41.7% 2 1 output as evidence of suitability for Live Load Defl. U806(0.125") 44.7% 2 1 particular application.Output here based 175" 17.5% 2 1 on building code-accepted design Max Defl. 0. Span/Depth 8. Na 1 properties and analysis methods. P P Installation of BOISE engineered wood products must be in accordance with %Allow %Allow current Installation Guide and applicable Bearing Supports Dim.(L x W) Value Support Member Material building codes.To obtain Installation Guide BO Post 3-1/2"x 3-1/2" 6809 Ibs n/a 65.4% Unspecified or ask questions,please call 61 Wall/Plate 3-1/2"x 3-1/2" 6809 Ibs n/a 65.4% Unspecified (800)232-0788 before installation. BC CALCO, BC FRAMERO,AJS-, Cautions ALLJOISTO,BC RIM BOARD- BCIO, BOISE GLULAM- SIMPLE FRAMING Column at Bearing BO analyzed for bearing only,column analysis has not been performed. SYSTEMO,VERSA-LAM@,VERSA-RIM PLUS@,VERSA-RIM@, Notes VERSA-STRAND@,VERSA-STUD@ are Design meets Code minimum (U240)Total load deflection criteria. trademarks of Boise wood Products, Design meets Code minimum (U360) Live load deflection criteria. L.L.C. Design meets arbitrary(1") Maximum load deflection criteria. Connection Diagram b d a c �1 a minimum=2" c=7-7/8" b minimum= 3" d= 12" Member has no side loads. Connectors are: 16d Sinker Nails Page 1 of 1 80iSE- Double 1-3/4" x 9-1/2" VERSA-LAM® 3100 SP Floor BeamlLevel 207 BC CALC®9.3 Design Report-US 1 span I No cantilevers'l 0/12 slope Friday,June 16,2006 10:14 Build 047 File Name: Johnson Austin.BCC Job Name: Austin Description: Level 2\D7 Address: 26 Shepards Way Specifier: be City, State,Zip: , Designer: Customer: Peter Johnson Company: Shepley Wood Products Code reports: ICBO 5512, NER 629 Misc: g 144 03-08 BO,3-1/2" B1,3-1/2" LL 1501 Ibs LL 1501 Ibs DL 442 Ibs DL 442 Ibs Total Horizontal Product Length=14-03-08 Load Summary Live Dead Snow Wind Roof Live Tag Description Load Type Ref. Start End 100% 90% 115% 133% 125% Trib. 1 Standard Load (deck) Unf.Area(psf) Left 00-00-00 14-03-08 60 15 03-06-00 Controls Summary Value %Allowable Duration Load Case Span Location Disclosure Pos. Moment 6503 ft-Ibs 46.6% 100% 1 1 - Internal Completeness and accuracy of input must End Shear 1648 Ibs 25.6% 100% 1 1 -Left be verified by anyone who would rely on Total Load Defl. U371 (0.448") 64.8% 1 1 output as evidence of suitability for Live Load Defl. U480 (0.346") 75.0% 1 1 particular application.Output here based 0.448" 44.8% 1 1 on building code-accepted design Max Defl. Span/Depth 0.44 Na 1 properties and analysis methods. p P Installation of BOISE engineered wood products must be in accordance with %Allow %Allow current Installation Guide and applicable Bearing Supports Dim.(L x W) Value Support Member Material building codes.To obtain Installation Guide BO Post 3-1/2"x 3-1/2" 1943 Ibs n/a 18.7% Unspecified or ask questions,please call B1 Wall/Plate 3-1/2"x 3-1/2" 1943 Ibs n/a 18.7% Unspecified (800)232-0788 before installation. BC CALC®,BC FRAMER®,AJS-, Cautions ALLJOIST®,BC RIM BOARD- BCI®, BOISE GLULAMT"" SIMPLE FRAMING Column at Bearing BO analyzed for bearing only, column analysis has not been performed. SYSTEM®,VERSA-LAM®,VERSA-RIM PLUS®,VERSA-RIM®, Notes VERSA-STRAND®,VERSA-STUD®are Design meets Code minimum(U240)Total load deflection criteria. trademarks of Boise Wood Products, Design meets Code minimum(U360) Live load deflection criteria. L.L.C. Design meets arbitrary(1") Maximum load deflection criteria. Connection Diagram b d a c •� • a minimum=2" c= 5-1/2" b minimum= 3" d = 12" Member has no side loads. Connectors are: 16d Sinker Nails Page 1 of 1 r SUBDIVISION PLAIT OF LAND IN•BARNSTABLg Beare* do Rellogg, Oivil ftineere ;r ' June 18, 1952 JI �II / 1 Al 00i� —At 79!8' !O" W H 74•,P7*90"W 300. m ,'m G O a b 2 0 7.88. ; dam CU Oil Q B/ OS 00 E _ W `0 3l f N 76 20 �y .r a 0 26 C. 23 {, o � N O o �°j A.V.Pi.�Popso w . ^\\ �� Z Francis f.Chase et it .��40 fl- .70 %h Subdivision of Part of Lot A2 Bhown on Plan 20950' J Piled with Oert. of Title No. 10329 Registry Distriot Of Barnstable Oounty s: S to certilwcates oft'! mi issued for land a ri hemw as..laf s. ,d, By the Court. MAO .I. ........ RC/Ci,4/,9..i'e _ R✓ : - � :,y_ .\•�\? /, l ........—.... , ,...--�: ......- MAP 259 / 010 AL lFE •. #180 29 16 MAP 259 _-\.... - - #201 00259 06 oti9 . ...... ' ;' #181 #120 .: MAP 1.59 \ 001-003 MAP 259CID 1 007 002 Dn #71 y_ me•µ. � •: ..._...._....-.......---- LA MAP D O 0 001 01'v \ #n __ _- i aMAP'ss9 016 zs9 112 MAP 4 01 ' #105 ti ❑MAP 25 Of 1 x-; 078 w x a P6O > - LLJ #153 - j' 013001 19 O MAP 258 ❑ MAP 01258 � . / 013-003 #65 #0 �/ 3 ..._ ( MAP 2 8 ..' .. 0 1 013sb0z I MAP \Desktop\Conservation.dgn 7/11/2006 8:40:56 AM �g Doc 1937'1439 08-2a-2603 3:22 CtfNa170371 BARNSTABLE LAND COURT REGISTRY QUITCLAIM DEED I,JOHN BRADBURY AUSTIN,of 2801 Girard Avenue,Evanston,Illinois 60201 For consideration paid and in full consideration of One($1.00)Dollar Grant to: JOHN BRADBURY AUSTIN and CHRISTINE FROULA, as Husband and Wife,Tenants by the Entirety of 2801 Girard Avenue,Evanston,Illinois 60201 with QUITCLAIM COVENANTS, the land located in Barnstable, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, more particularly bounded and described as follows: LOT 26 Land Court Plan 20950-F PROPERTY ADDRESS: Shepherd's Way,Barnstable,Massachusetts 02630 Said property is conveyed subject to and with the benefit of, as the case may be, all easements, encumbrances, restrictions, reservations, rights, agreements and matters of record in so far as they are now in force and applicable. For Grantor's title,see Certificate of Title No. 168959 on file with the Barnstable County Registry District of the Land Court. Executed as a sealed instrument this j day of August,2003. [A JohriFffradgury Austin STATE OF ILLINOIS County: C'"Dys, August IL-1 2003 Then personally appeared the aforementioned John Bradbury Austin and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his free act and deed,before me, r 'OFFICIAL SEAL" �, Tracy E.Anderson BARNSTABLE C UNerTYt Notary public State of Illinois Notary Public REGISTRY OF DEEDS My Commission Exp.112121R6 rY _A TRUE COPY,ATTEST My commission expires: 2-24-O(p S 026w J BARNSTABLE REGISTRY OF DEEDS �Apvfds Lljolv LA LY El _- ( -- rr PO ED CS) I JOHN B. AUSTIN and CHRISTINE FROULA OKHHDC Application for Lot #26 Sheperds Way, Barnstable House--New Construction July 29, 2005 Written Dimensions of Austin House for Lot 26 as requested by OKHHD Committee on July 27, 2005 1 P 9 �D A ESQ 'fo to t Page 1 of 1 Steven Berglund From: "Steven Berglund" <sebx@comcast.net> To: <email@town.barnstable.ma.us> Cc: "Ann Canedy" <acanedy@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 8:13 AM Subject: Austin Roadway Mr. Jack LeBoeuf, Building Inspector Mr. Tom Perry, Building Commissioner Dear Jack, Please provide Katie and me with reassurance that injustices incurred by the Austin roadway construction will be corrected. I must admit our confidence in your statement that"the roadway will be made right before an occupancy permit is granted" was shaken when we learned the Austins had been given a temporary occupancy permit before any corrections to the roadway had been made. However, we realize that a "permanent" occupancy permit has yet to be granted. May I restate our position relative to the road situation: We demand the portion of roadbed which illegally occupies our property (as described by the SKETCH PLAN of LAND dated June 6, 2006, prepared by Down Cape Engineering, Inc) be removed. We demand reimbursement from the Austin's in the amount of$720 for the fee submitted to us by Down Cape Engineering Inc. in response to our request for their surveying services to determine and delineate the Western right-of-way boundary of the easement. (Copy of survey documents and billing invoice,provided under separate cover this morning to your office). Road construction broke three rails of a split rail fence bordering the right-of-way. Two such rails have been replaced at the Austins. I ask that they provide a third rail that I will install. Lastly we demand that corrections be made to the roadbed that mitigate destructive shoulder erosion and prevent silting of our property that degrades its value and endangers a State certified wildlife habitat. The roadbed has been elevated as much as approximately 24 inches above natural grade and has an extremely steep shoulder. Had the road been placed centrally in the easement corridor, the risk of erosion would have been substantially reduced and our property would not have been violated Thank you for reviewing this matter. I will deliver supporting documents to 200 Main St. this morning and I hope I can have an opportunity to speak with you today at your convenience. Thank you. Sincerely, Steve Berglund �` d - UO v 6/6/2007 c K UND d..ftapu imtat is ni Al }}!! CaQhrili X t ARtF7/q m k "* 4 trst wst r k- > e 2 s � y eq "S- �/173�f►i { al jL b � 'tOR o► viuct6fad.Ith rvuA lmprov�ment ° '` lp TU Alf KATH 41 i i ' i O DOWN CAPE ENGINEERING_ INC. 2 CIVIL ENGINEERS &- LAND SURVEYORS �nvoice BMLV" 939 Main Sureet Y armourhport. NIA 02675 Date Invoice# N11: S014-36'-4i-I I FAX:>tll'_3G2-9SStl 7/20/2006 4979 7263 lund erglund av t)26 0 DOE Job#t Job Location RE: r)h-t3I 39 Shepherds WaY 13;irnsl;iblc Terms Description Amount FResurch. e�,, comps. stake Shepherds Wnv 720.00 Sketch plan enclosed - please call to let us know where you want the bounds set. A service charge will he:ulded to:III hills 30 days last clue. The vale is 1.5%,her month lased inn:m:uuuuil percentage rate of 1 tigo. VISA and MASTERCARD ACCctI1TI:I) ITFASF INCHJI)1•:•I•l-lt{ IOI3 NtlMHFIZ ON YOUR Cl 'l'h;nik You liar your husiness. l .7 / IA /I i f 7 1 ,�• �+r ` ��.� •td1 •,f t,�\ ; ��,�S fir! 1 � ,I�' i �' .. ,to ���,�' r•' c �� - � .ti 42, • 4T, AA �0 r �n �t' •fit i - Y- •> x .r O III k i 3h " 4 y a _ �� .� r• ..•\?• aw. ,�� � .r.F. � `tl �. ,� 'jam-1 F i� ` F r' . i J r-. i� � i r Aw ' r w We 41 i;. N Z June 6, 2007 Dear Jack, Please except for review the enclosed position paper (represented by my most recent e-mail sent to you Monday), survey documents and pictures illustrating .the points that concern Ted Theodorus, Katie and me about the Shepherds Way road situation. I certainly do not want to be construed as being "pushy" nor do I wish to be irritating, for I do know you guys are extremely busy. We appreciate very much the attention and concern you, have extended.to us as the Shepherds Way saga has unfolded. Please except this packet of information as my attempt to summarize what is probably already known to the Building Department and others. I had hoped to review this with you last Monday, but when I learned of your cancellation late in the day from Kate who was in Boston at the time, my day off was over and with it my opportunity to meet with you personally. Please contact me if I can answer any questions. I hope this information is helpful. Thank you for time and service. Sincerely, Steve Berglund e Packet contents include a copy of e-mail dated 6/6/2007 and: 1) "Sketch Plan of Land" by Down Cape Engineering demonstrates incursion of roadbed material beyond right-of-way boundary onto abutting property. 2) Surveying services invoice from Down Cape Engineering for locating and staking western border of access easement. 3) Photograph of newly created roadbed looking northward from property line of 58 Shepherds Way. Red dotted line marks Ted Theodorus' driveway. On right side note partially obscured rock wall somewhat removed from roadbed marking easement boundary. Observe on the left the absence of stakes marking the westward easement boundary. Small flags on the left in distance mark proposed utilities path. 4) Northerly view of Shepherds Way prior to utilities placement. Image demonstrates newly placed boundary stakes marking western boundary of access easement and incursion of roadbed shoulder onto abutting property. Red hatch line marks Theodorus' driveway. 5) Southerly view of Shepherds Way new roadbed. Note boundary marking stakes and incursion of roadbed shoulder onto abutting property. In foreground note elevated fill piled against broken lower fence rail. 6) New roadbed shoulder against split rail fence on abutting property. Roadbed elevated to approximately 24 inches above grade. Note damaging effects of erosion. 7) Southerly view of new Shepherds Way roadbed from Theodorus' driveway. On the left side,rock wall delineating Eastern easement boundary is concealed by brush. On right side, stakes mark western easement boundary. Roadbed is not centered in right- of-way and encroaches on abutting'property. ,oF1HE ra'ti Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services BA"STABM y 'Al. g Thomas F. Geiler, Director �p i639• �0 'Fvrna'�6. Building Division Thomas Perry, CBO Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 June 4, 2007 Mr. John Austin & Ms. Christine Froula 58 Sheperds Way `Barnstable, MA 02630 Dear Mr. Austin & Ms. Froula: In reviewing the permitting and approvals that are in the house files for 58 Sheperds Way, Barnstable the following items so far need to be completed before a certificate of occupancy will be issued: 1. Railings on screen porch. 2. Hand rails on interior stairway from basement to first floor. 3. Hand rail on stairway from first floor to first floor landing. 4. Landscaping needs to be completed according to the plan dated July 6, 2005 amended July 14, 2005;these plans were approved on August 10, 2005. 5. Drainage corrected on Sheperds Way according to Conservation letter dated June 1, 2007. 6. Fencing along Sheperds Way that was damaged because of utility installation needs to be repaired or replaced. Respect , T omas Perry, CBO Building Commission Encl. �INETown of Barnstable Regulatory Services SOWN CJF BAf NSTABLE 9 M'S Thomas F. Geiler,Director Z001 s639. � I Conservation Division Jul PM I: 10 Robert W. Gatewood,Administrator 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 li`�lSIrr7N E-mail:conservation @town.bamstable.ma.us Office: 508-8624093 Fax: 508-778-2412 MEMO To: Tom Perry,Building Commissioner From: Rob Gatewood Date: June 1, 2007 Re: Map 258.013.003, Sheperds Way Tom, Aware that review of this ongoing project is underway for Certificate of Occupancy purposes,I Q� would like to pass along a Conservation Division concern for the driveway. Final off-grading and loaming/seeding of the shoulders (particularly the western one) are in need of completion. Presently, the unfinished condition of the driveway is allowing sedimentation of the buffer zone to the adjacent wetland. This situation would seem easily correctible. Thanks kindly for the assistance. � CD N ., • . • •r �, ni Ln m ,.. fay O Postage $ C3 certtfled.Fee O 0 Retenuin Recelpt Fee �� Po Q strn (Ehdorsemt aequired) r q ResMcted Delivery Fee - (Endorsem*ntRequired) cC p Total Postage&Fees $ = J O Se o M t Mt"No.; -..--.--- PQBoxNo.- - „ a =1 ilk ■ ■ Complete items 1,2,'and 3 Also complete ; " A Signature' ;t Item-4 if Restrlcted`Delivery is desired: ■ Pnnt your,name and address on the reverse X t Agent so that we can return the card to you: g - .Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mail piece F' B'Received by(Punted Name) _ pate o pe ery;J `or,on the front If,space permits i 1. Article Addressed to D''is deUveryaddress different d fror'n�em } k / p If YES enter a d�J r" �__ T ►Y rasa below Uoa 'Y a ^A °k 3�➢ T � } '� _- r 3 'Se ce Type g . :t r my jet Certfied Maft O Express_Malt Registered .0 Retum R' ,t Pit for Merchandise' " _ fi 0 Insured Mail � �r' 4-0est06ted Delivery?(Extra Fee)Y 0 Yes I ;2 Article Numbers irranse.rromAseNrcetabe 7006 0810 0000 3521 7987 PS Form 3811=August 2001� ° n Domestic Return Receipt gr Y aX $� t <s£• t d `{z9 ix n102595-02M-1540 4 f 58 Sheperds Way Barnstable MA 02630 2007 MAY 23 AM 9: 44 May 22, 2007 Mr. Thomas Perry, Building Commissioner lt l tflA! Barnstable MA Dear Mr. Perry, Thank you for responding to our request to rceive the Building Department's official list of requirements for our Certificate of Occupancy so that we can get our home insured. After learning that our 2pm appointment with you today had somehow gotten cancelled and that you cannot find a moment to see us today, we called Mr. Leboeuf. He told us that we should now be communicating only with you. If that is not the case, would you please inform both him and us at your earliest convenience? Here are the most urgent matters: 1) Although we understand that normal practice is for the Building Inspector to provide a clear list of requirements on Town of Barnstable letterhead, we have only Mr. Leboeuf s handwritten list on a plain piece of paper. This informal document may not protect us adequately from potential problems (for example, a neighbor's possible future unfounded claim taken up by one Town official or another). We request either an official document or written assurance from you that it is complete,correct,and presented in a usual and acceptable form. 2)Mr Leboeuf s list says only "Road fixed,"without specifying what he means. We had thought Chief Crosby's letter adequately addressed the road issue for purposes of our Certificate of Occupancy. (Anyone who knows Sheperds Way knows that the road is in better shape now than it has ever been.) If for some reason Chief Crosby's letter is not enough, we repeat our request that the Building Department spell out exactly what we are expected to do as soon as possible so that there can be no confusion. As noted in our last letter, Mr Morin cannot begin work without clear knowledge of the requirements. One example: Keyspan put haybales between the commonly owned private way and a wetland lot when laying the gas line. As co-owners of the road,we believe these haybales should stay because they protect the wetland from the road and vice versa; our neighbor Mrs. Cirrito, on whose border they are placed, agrees. If we are forced to have the gas company remove them (against our better judgment)we will do so. But we need that requirement on paper so that we cannot be held responsible for the consequences, whether or not a different neighbor complains. 3)Our FAIR insurance agent has never heard of a"temporary" CO. She doubts whether FAIR can accept a handwritten note with no Town letterhead. She is checking whether and when we can get our home insured under the circumstances the Building Department has placed us in. Again, thank you for your help in our effort to comply quickly with all normal and usual requirements so that we can get our permanent Certificate of Occupancy and insure our home. John Austin/Christine Froula cell 312 805 2039 8 Sheperds=Way Barnstable MA"02630- May 18, 2007 (Friday) Mr. Tom Perry Building Department Dear Mr. Perry, Mr. LeBoeuf inspected our house last Friday (May 11) and found two minor problems (a basement stair rail exension and Mr. Amara's instruction to replace a basement GFI with a regular outlet for the alarm system). We immediately got both problems fixed and have put in calls to.Mr. Amara requesting his final electrical inspection. Mr Leboeuf told our builder, Peter Johnson, and site surveyor, Ed Kelley, that he has other issues prior to his issuing our Certificate of Occupancy. They told us Mr. Leboeuf � had agreed to get a list of them to us early this week (May 14-16) so that there can be no confusion as to what needs to be done. We stopped by today _n hope of getting the list. Mr Leboeuf said that he has not made it and would not get to is for another week. He said he had to check with Conservation and the OKH. Patty Mackey told us that OKH signed off already and has left the matter entirely in Mr. Leboeuf s hands. At our request Fred deStepanis kindly informed Mr. Leboeuf that he has visited our site (following up on an unfounded complaint) and found no violation of Conservation law. We also gave Mr Leboeuf a letter from Chief Crosby verifying that the part of Sheperds Way that had to be improved to give us access is now in good shape. The Chief also mentioned some potholes in the commonly traveled part of this commonly owned road before the section only used to access our land. These were not caused by our construction and are properly the responsibility of the common owners, but we will have some material put in them. We met with Julius Morin about the final road work on Saturday, May 12. He immediately put us into his schedule for the week of May 21, by which time we had expected to have Mr. Leboeuf s list. Mr. Morin cannot proceed until we know exactly what is required. We remain very eager to comply so that we can get our Certificate of Occupancy. Our home cannot be insured without the Certificate, a serious concern. We respectfully request to receive the list as soon as possible so that we can get our Certificate of Occupancy. Again, we would like to make clear that we are trying our best to comply as quickly as is humanly possible with all usual and normal requirements for the Certificate so that we can get our home insured at the earliest possible date. Thank you very much for your kind help. John Austin/Christine Froula -- Cell 312 805 2039 , ....F BARNSTABLE FIRE DEPARTMENT y.�,B`�StiF s� 3249 Main Street—P.O. Box 94 rr o =m' a9z7 Barnstable,Massachusetts 02630 gSsqCH�5" 508-362-3312 FAX: 508-362-8444 Robert M..Crosby ChristopherJ.Olsen FIRECHIEF Deputy Chief . rcrosby@barnstablefire.org colsen@barnstablefire.org May 18, 2007 To whom it may concern Shepards Way I have been asked to provide a letter regarding the roadway known as Shepards way. The Barnstable Fire Department has traversed the road known as Shepards way and we 150 find that the road after it separates from# 11 and#39 appears to be`&a substantial base to support the 75,000 lbs. as required by the Town Of Barnstable roadaccess guidelines. ,x £ adtho oufThis guideline also require ;aclearanceto '`height of1 s`s1d6�s?eauss'as imoninsor B road m th asXhadmer regarding ,e needed improvementskto the road fil n50 5. ?74»,f E ..R,rzs s'? �j y We feelththe roadfleading up to thersplitzt�#lta%nd#39`�ShearWayneed�s to be re airedq>a0a ge potholestare present�andxwe needto assure wemamtam astable base b i5P-''il * 'K 3{>�. t� suitable forourapparatus 4il1 -^•�•+., i: }"3 3• w X aR at+a-,.v' �i+ i'r "" E¢z gr Qn"a..y.`,A gt k a. y S per. { '' J. if5�'� F e-....^'^a+w ..�+M}'.:pt.. £✓�C. '39'Y.k.'e-"A"1% 'S5 i The width of the roadway appears to meetFthe requirements set"forth by th>sdepartment during discussions It is important to note that the base strength width and clearance of the whole roadway shall be maintained and or repaired to meet these requirements, including further installation of base materials if settling or other changes occur due to the weather. Also the side and overhead clearances shall be maintained by trimming and clearing to maintain-the access as it is now. If you need additional information please feel free to contact my office. Chief Robert M. Crosby www.bamstablefire.org r tv t �pF1HE TpN, Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services y MASS. Thomas F. Geiler,Director 16.39. 1.�•. Building Division Thomas Perry, CBO,Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 May 7, 2007 John Austin& Chris Froula 58 Sheperds Way Barnstable, MA 02630 Re: 58 Sheperds Way, Barnstable Map 258 Parcel 013003 Dear Property Owners: We have not performed a final inspection for the above-referenced property and have not issued a Certificate of Occupancy. The Town of Barnstable Zoning Ordinance, Article XII, SS 240-124 Bonds and permits (B) Occupancy permits states that: "No premises and no building or structure erected, altered or in any way changed as to construction or use, under a permit or otherwise, shall be occupied or used without an occupancy permit signed by the Building Commissioner." Therefore, you are not allowed to stay in this home and must vacate the premises immediately. Please call me at 508-862-4035 as soon as possible. Sincerely, / s L Jack LeBoeuf Building Inspector Certified Mail 7002 0510 0003 5436 1658 I Cc: 2801 Girard Avenue Evanston, IL 60201 Certified Mail 7006 0810 0000 3521 8014 Sheperds W ayH SENDER: • , COMPLETE f SECTIONON DELIVERY ■ Complete iteMs 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. ig t e item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Agent so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back-of the mailpiece; e R ive by(Pn d Name) C. Date eliv or on the front if space permits. i i 1. ArticleaAd ressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? Yes • If YES,-enter.delivery address below: . ❑ No ,z 3. Service Type f . 'Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail A ❑ Registered . Afg�fleturn Receipt for Merchandise a ❑ Insured Mail '❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑ Yes i 2. Article Number 7006 0810 0000 3521 8014 f (Transfer iromiserwge;abet) PS Form 3811,August 2001 , Domestic Return Receipt i { i ! 102595-02-M-1540i C3 .• I cc r-q m _ Pe $ HYANNjs, pe. C3 CeRified Fee ♦ Poems . I Here O Return Receipt Fee 4'� (End orsemertt Required) G J i C3 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) c0 C3 Total Postage&Fees O 'Sent To _ o r • or PO Box No. ^� y City State;ZIP .00 ! t �OFTNE r Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services snxxsrasLe, 9 MASS. Thomas F. Geiler, Director Eoiu•1 Building Division Thomas Perry, CBO, Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 www.town.barnsiable.maxs Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 May 7, 2007 John Austin& Chris Froula 58 Sheperds Way Barnstable, MA 02630 Re: 58 Sheperds Way, Barnstable Map 258 Parcel 013003 Dear Property Owners: We have not performed a final inspection for the above-referenced property and have not issued a Certificate of Occupancy. The Town of Barnstable Zoning Ordinance, Article XII, SS 240-124 Bonds and permits (B) Occupancy permits states that: "No premises and no building or structure erected, altered or in any way changed as to construction or use, under a permit or otherwise, shall be occupied or used without an occupancy permit signed by the Building Commissioner." Therefore, you are not allowed to stay in this home and must vacate the premises immediately. Please call me at 508-862-4035 as soon as possible. Sincerely, Jack LeBoeuf Building Inspector Certified Mail 7002 0510 0003 5436 1658 Cc: 2801 Girard Avenue Evanston, IL 60201 Certified Mail 7006 0810 0000 3521 8014 SheperdsWay58 SENDER: . • LJ ■ Complete.items i,2,and 3.Also complete A. Sig r F3 Agent W,: item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X ❑A res e ■ Print your name and address on the reverse d Name C. D fide so that we can return the card to you. B. (�"t ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ❑�.,Y)e A or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item 1 ltil Yes � 1. Article Addressed to: C�u If YES,enter delivery address below: ' Al 3. Service Type tf ertified Mail. ❑Express Mail ❑ RegisteredLrn Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. . 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number 7002 0510 0003 5436 1658 i (transfer from service,Ebel) ! I . ,. _. _ - ------ t o25s5-o2-M-t sao, PS.Form 3.811,August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt i :! Ln .D rSa I I Postage $ m �CP MA Q2r' �• Certified Fee L r) Postmark Return Receipt Fee Hefe M (Endorsement Required) V RV O i O Restricted Delivery Fee ! (Endorsement Required) O O Total Postage&Fees rs ` t.r1 Sent To Street,Apt.No.,; M or PO Box l�o O --- ------- '� C[.11 '� ---------------- O city,Sta ZIP+4 2- - t B Ads CAPE COD COMMISSION 0 ®.' 3225 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 226 " .- o, BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 �r9ss CHUS FAX(508)362-3836 ',� A E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org TO: Town of Barnstable Town Clerk, Building Inspector, Town Planner, Planning Board, Board of Appeals, Conservation Commission, Board of Health FROM: Gail Hanley, Clerk of the Commission SUBJECT: John Austin and Christine Froula Residence Minor Modification to the District of Critical Planning Concern Hardship Exemption Decision DATE: September 1, 2006 Enclosed please find a copy of a minor modification to the John Austin/Christine Froula Residence District of Critical Planning Concern Hardship Exemption Decision that was approved by the Cape Cod Commission on August 31, 2006. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. p • r r C".1 I aq � CAPE COD COMMISSION 7 - 3225 MAIN STREET t P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 Sti (508)362-3828 S ACHv FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org Date: August 31,2006 To: John Austin and Christine Froula 2801 Girard Avenue N Chicago,IL 60201 L L From: Cape Cod Commission J��7 .� �v Project: 56`She d's Way,B lle;Iv'1A� Project#: HDEX#05032 Re: Modification of District of Critical Planning Concern(DCPC)Hardship Exemption Decision dated January 12 2006 p rY BOOK/PAGE: Lot 26,Plan 20950F, Certificate#170371 MODIFICATION#1 OF DISTRICT OF CRITICAL PLANNING CONCERN (DCPC) HARDSHIP EXEMPTION DECISION The District of Critical Planning Concern(DCPC)Hardship Exemption Decision dated January 12,2006 for the proposed single-family residence at 56 Shepherd's Way, Barnstable,MA is hereby amended. The purpose of the modification is to allow a modification to the building design to incorporate a shed dormer in the upper level of the proposed building as illustrated in a plan submitted to the Commission dated August 30,2006 by Mr. Peter Johnson.All findings and conditions attached to the original decision continue to apply except as modified herein. Condition G2 is modified as follows: G2. The Project will be built in accordance with the following plans: Elevation plans dated July 14, 2005, as amended by plans dated August 30,2006 prepared by Peter Johnson, and site plans by Edward Kelley received January 3, 2006. arga en . Date ExecuU ctor Capemission Austin/Froula Modification#1 August 31,2006 Page 1 E _ On this 31st of4wni52006, before me,the undersigned notary public, personally appeared;. ehi2r at?Y�ef" F�In proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification,—whiW were joe to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attach document, and acknowledged to me that she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. Notary Public Commonwealth of Massachusetts My Commission Expires: e Austin/Froula Modification#1 August 31,2006 Page 2 f � a OLD KING'S HIGHWAY jREGIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION P.O.Box 140,Barnstable,Massachusetts 02630-0140 Tel: 508-775-1766 FAX 508-775-9248 John B. Austin and Christine Froula, Appellant/Applicant 9 --i env �)> Vs. Decision #2006-1 < z Old King's Highway Regional Historic ;i D District Committee for the Town of Barnstable 'r r N On Tuesday, May 2, 2005 at 7:45 P.M., the Commission held a hearing at the Fire StatVion Community Room, 340 Route 6A, Yarmouth Port, Massachusetts, on Appeal #2006-1 filed by John B. Austin and Christine Froula seeking review and reversal of the Barnstable Historic District Committee's March 30, 2006 decision on an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness covering proposed modifications to a previously approved new dwelling to be located at 58 Shepard's Way, Barnstable, Massachusetts. Present were Robert DeRoeck, Sandwich; Deborah Gray, Yarmouth; Roy Robinson, Brewster; Patricia Anderson, Barnstable; Peter Lomenzo, Dennis; James R. Wilson, Commission Counsel; and John B. Austin and Christine Froula Appellant/Applicants. Absent was Paul Leach, Orleans. The Committee's decision was filed with the Town Clerk on March 30, 2006. The appeal was entered with the Commission on April 10, 2006, within the 10-day appeal period. The Appellant's Presentation: Christine Froula addressed the Commission on behalf of her appeal. She requested that the determination of the Barnstable Town Committee be reversed and that the Commission grant a Certificate of Appropriateness for the requested construction of the two and one half story dwelling. She stated that her husband's family had owned the subject property for many years. She described the proposed.project as being in planning for many years and in the permitting process for two (2) years. She presented four (4) scaled elevations and a site plan of the proposed dwelling. Photographs and pictures of the site and other buildings in the area were shown to the Commissioners. The dwelling was described as reflecting features of an old-fashioned two and one-half story farmhouse with energy conservation design and environmental protection concerns. She indicated that her committee had not received proper plans until the day of the hearing and suggested that it was difficult to applicants. work with materials submitted by the She said that the Town Committee had acted properly in denying the application. Public Comment: Stephen E. Berglund stated that he and his neighbors were sympatric to the applicant's effort to build their home on the site. He stated that he was troubled by the relocation to the upper corner of the lot. David Munsell suggested that the matter should be returned to the Town Historic District Committee for another review. Ned Handy stated that he supported the Applicants and hoped that the Commission would grant the appeal and approve the application. Discussion: The members of the Commission reviewed the plans and photographs submitted during the hearing. Roy W. Robinson, Jr. stated that he had visited the site and examined the plans. He observed that the neighborhood might best be described as "eclectic."He noted that it contained many different styles and sizes of dwellings. Peter Lomenzo indicated that he had visited the site and after seeing the plans and hearing the testimony determined that the Barnstable Historic District Committee had made an error in judgment in refusing to approve the increase in height to the proposed building. He noted that the public view from Route 6A was across a relatively long distance and suggested that the proposed changes to building would appear relatively modest. Deborah Gray stated that she felt that it was unfortunate that the location of the building had to be changed. She indicated that she had visited the site and agreed that the change in the plans appeared at a distance to be relatively minor. She noted that the proposed location was relatively remote from public view and that the Town Historic District Committee appeared to have made an error in not granting a Certificate of Appropriateness for the changes in size. Robert DeRoeck stated that he had examined the plans and that he was in agreement with the opinion that the Certificate of Appropriateness should have been issued by the Barnstable Historic District Committee. i She reported that the Barnstable Town Committee had issued a Certificate of Appropriateness for the dwelling on August 10, 2005. The proposed dwelling was to have been located in the center of the 2.46 acre lot. Subsequently, they were advised that the Cape Cod Planning Coa ission had placed a building moratorium (DCPC zone) on the site. As a result, they applied to the Cape Cod Planning Commission for a "hardship exemption" for the project. In January 2006, the "hardship exemption"was issued on the condition that the septic system and building be relocated to a site that was a greater distance away from the abutting Hinckley Pond. She acknowledged that the new site would be closer to her neighbor's house, but suggested that it would be less visible to the general public. She also acknowledged increasing the size of the building's footprint by approximately two feet. She indicated that neither she nor her husband were aware that the changes required a new approval by the Barnstable Historic District Committee. She expressed the opinion that they thought that the increase in size and the site location change were details and insignificant changes to the project. They began construction and shortly thereafter were given a"stop work"order from the Town Building Department. Following the issuance of the "stop work"order, the applicant filed for two Certificates of Appropriateness addressing (1) the new location of the proposed dwelling and (2) the increase in size and its changes to the building. The Barnstable Historic District Committee approved the location change, but denied the Certificate of Appropriateness for changes to the house because they would excessively increase the overall height of the building. The Applicants claimed that the denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness for a "relatively modest"increase in height was an error. The Town Committee's Presentation: Dorothy Stahley addressed the Commission on behalf of the Barnstable Town Committee. She stated that while the Committee had approved the original proposed design, that a majority of the Committee felt that the increase in height would make the building more visible and suggested that the changes to the windows and other features of the buildings would have significant impact on an extremely sensitive (DCPC) neighborhood. i 1 � The Commission findings: The Commission found as follows: It was an error to deny the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness. The Town Committee's determination should be annulled. A Certificate of Appropriateness should issue for the construction of the proposed dwelling as shown on the site plan dated July 29, 2005 and revised Dec. 30, 2005 and the r four elevations approved by the OKHHD Commission on May 2, 2006. (See copy of plans placed on file with the Barnstable Historic District Committee by the Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Commission) Said Certificate to be subject to use of traditional wooden siding, roofing material and all other specifications as previously approved by the Barnstable Historic District Committee. Determination: As to Appeal#2006-1, the decision of the Barnstable Committee is annulled and the Certificate of Appropriateness issued (4-0-1) in accordance with the findings set forth above. Any person aggrieved by this decision has a right to appeal to the District Court Department, Barnstable Division, within 20 days of the filing of this decision with the Barnstable Town Clerk. Roy W. Robins , Chairperson - - - -, � ' r I /�-�� �K�� � { ,-- - 2801 Girard Avenue Evanston II,60201 March 31, 2006 Tel. 847 869 0133 Mr.Paul Roma Building Department 200 Main Street Hyannis MA 02601 Dear Mr. Roma, On August 10, 2005,the Barnstable OKHHD Committee issued a Certificate of Approval for our home at 58 Sheperds Way,Barnstable. As you are aware,we were subsequently forced to change the site to accommodate soil conditions and the Cape Cod Commission's mission of preserving Hinckley Pond. As it turned out, we also had to go back to the OKHHD Committee for approval of the minor modifications made to our already approved design in working through the"preliminary plans"required by OKHHD Guidelines to the final,buildable plans of September 2005 filed in your office last fall. The Committee approved the following changes on the following dates: New site and landscape plan: February 8 Window adjustments,new stair window, +2' garage (E-W from 22' to 24'): March 8 On March 22 the Committee denied the 22"height increase caused by TJI depth and stair headroom code(vote: 2-1). In accord with these decisions,we enclose drawings revised to register all the OKHHD-approved changes(these are already shown in the plans filed in your office last fall)as well as a decrease in height from the 35' grade-to-ridge(requested and denied)to the 33' 2"grade-to-ridge height approved by the Committee in August 2005. We enclose: Schematic diagram showing approved height(33' 2"grade-to-ridge), supplied in July at the OKHHD Committee's request and approved by them August 10, 2005; Spec sheet with the approved window changes Comparison of preliminary(July)and final window specs; Four elevations showing approved garage section extension(22' to 24'), approved 33' 2" grade-to-ridge height,and approved windows; Drawing of attic floor/roof framing Preliminary drawing indicating code conformity of attic stairs at 33' 2" We will be most grateful if you could let us know directly at your earliest convenience if there is anything else you require. As there are many documented factual errors and omissions in the Barnstable OKHHDC's official report of the March 22 hearing,we are considering appealing the 22"height decision. Should it be granted in time, and with your permission,we would revert to the"September 2005" final drawings filed with your office last fall. Should it not be granted at all, or in time,Peter Johnson will build by the enclosed plans. Thank you very uch for all y Yours truly, � John Austin and Christine Froula I s i John Austin and Christine Froula r 54 & 56 Sheperds Way ZL Barnstable MA 02630 ^� CO February 14, 2006 CO Patricia Anderson, Chair, and OKFHD Committee Members 200 Main Street Hyannis,MA 02601 Reply to Ted Theodores'public letters of January 16 and Feb. 1, 2006 to Patricia Anderson re proposed Austin residence, 56 Sheperds Way,Barnstable We request that the following reply to certain misleading and damaging omissions, misrepresentations,and speculations in Ted Theodores's two public letters be sent to all Committee members and placed in our file. We further request that our reply be either read aloud into the public record on March 8 or officially acknowledged in the minutes as having been silently read by all members. Although matters related to the new site might seem moot after the 3-2 vote on February 8,Mr. Theodores's two letters inseparably connect issues of siting and design, forcing us to defend our project against his assault by addressing both. I. Re: Mr.Theodores's January 16,2006 letter 1)When he says he "became aware of a significant change," our neighbor Mr. Theodores omits the following facts. In December,as a courtesy,John informed him by telephone of the site change,necessitated by soil conditions discovered only in December(after John and Ed Kelley had marked the original house site on November 29)and by a Cape Cod Commission requirement communicated to us only on December 28-29(see attached Timeline reconstructed from phone/email records). John told Ted we had asked Ed Kelley to keep the house as far west as possible and kept in touch with Ted. After the marking, excavation, and pouring of the foundation over 13 days,Mr.Theodores emailed us first on Jan. 11 to complain("now that I have had a chance to take a closer look")that the new site would depreciate his property and spoil his view(attached Timeline). We again explained by phone and email that soil conditions and CCC requirements,not our wish,had necessitated it. We also asked Ed Kelley whether the new site would depreciate Mr. Theodores'property and spoil his view. Ed Kelley replied, "I wouldn't think so";he said our house will hardly be visible from Mr. Theodores'house, and that Mr. Theodores was likely experiencing an "optical illusion" created by the excavation. Ed offered to explain the siting considerations to Mr. Theodores. We e-mailed Mr. Theodores inviting him to talk with Ed Kelley about his concerns(Jan. 11 email correspondence, attached). Mr. Theodores did not. Instead,without warning us,he sent his January 16 letter to the OKHHD,adding a claim he had never made to us: that"the house being built is substantially different from the plans that I was shown." In fact, as the preliminary plans filed on June 22(to which Mr. Theodores refers)and the final plans worked through with the architect and engineer show,we are building substantially the same house already judged appropriate by the OKHIID and the CCC(the CCC had final plans). It is unchanged in any respect that could reasonably be said to affect its appropriateness. Rather than repeat it here,we attach our Explanation of minor design changes of Austin house from preliminary to final plans(Feb. 8 statement). When we called to ask Mr.Theodores what he meant by "substantial changes,"he replied: "the 9'ceilings." As our public records show,and as we explained to him in another set �006 FEB S FM 2 0 N i of emails on Jan. 30-31 (available on request),he is completely in error. Every single drawing we submitted throughout our six OKH> D hearings was based on 9'ceilings;never did we or our architect ever draw, let alone submit, an elevation based on lower ceilings,for our house was always ecologically designed to be cooled by ceiling fans and not A/C. In making these erroneous claims, and in omitting the abovementioned facts from his complaint,Mr. Theodores created the false and damaging impression that we "deceived"him(as he claimed in conversation and his Jan. 30-31 e-mails)and tried to evade the OKHFID's authority. 2)In stating that he supported our application during 2005,Mr. Theodores did not mention that; though he had kindly agreed to represent us at the July 27 meeting(saying "I've already put it in my calendar"),he failed to appear. We were told that the ensuing confusion--for which we of course took full responsibility--delayed issuance of our Certificate. 3)Mr. Theodores states that he "firmly believes" our house "will have an adverse aesthetic impact on character of this critical area." In fact the house on its new site is no more visible from Sheperds Way, and less visible from 6A,than it would have been on the original site. The middle of the field is more visible from 6A, and soil conditions would have required it to be raised 6' higher. The new site is also further from Hinckley Pond, which we and(presumably)all our neighbors wish to protect; and less visible to abuttors Berglund,Parrella(as he acknowledged in the Feb. 8 hearing), and Liddy. Even Mr. Theodores told us by telephone(January 30)that he would have seen more of the house in its original site. Given these facts,we are at a loss to find any factual grounds whatsoever for Mr.Theodores's "firm belief," even apart from the soil conditions and the CCC requirement. 4)Mr. Theodores states that our house is placed"tightly in one very visible corner" of our lot, in a manner he believes not "consistent with other homes in this area." Many homes in our neighborhood(including the two on 6A flanking Scudder Lane and 65 Scudder, built by John's parents)are equally close to lot lines(see 1998 GIS site map--topography and siting attached). This map definitively corrects Mr. Theodores'misrepresentation of what is usual and historically appropriate for house sites in our neighborhood. .As Ed Kelley explained at the Feb. 8 hearing,there remains plenty of room for landscape screening south of our driveway on the new site(45'to N lot line, 30'to E). The existing screening between our lot and Sheperds Way will be disturbed very little(Ed Kelley: "you may have to cut some brush,but no trees"). Further,there is ample room on Mr. Theodores's side of Sheperds Way to restore the landscape screening between our two lots that he destroyed on moving into his house(visible on the attached 1998 GIS site map--vegetation). Because Mr. Theodores cleared that screen without consulting us,his abuttor,we believe it only right and fair that he take some responsibility for reestablishing screening between our homes. To that end,we proposed to him that we collaborate on landscaping--an offer he has so far refused to entertain or even acknowledge(attached Jan. 11 email correspondence). Our planned landscaping,approved at the August 10 hearing,has not changed except to move east with the house. We still plan to screen the driveway with holly(Ilex aquifolium or opaca), cypress(Cupressocyparis leylandii"Haggerston Grey"), or similar appropriate plants. Our offer to collaborate with Mr. Theodores remains open. 5)Mr. Theodores calls our house "an unusually tall structure" and claims that it will be higher on its new site than the original site. The turn-of-the-century photographs of the old Smith Farm (now our neighborhood), supplied with our June 22 application, show several 2.5 storey structures as well as a high barn(attached). Today the neighborhood, like the N. side of 6A,has several 2.5 storey structures. Our house, designed and proportioned with care to harmonize with � � EEB 15 2. 0�� I the old ell-shaped farmhouses in period photographs,resembles these old structures in the new site no less than the original. Further,as Ed Kelley explained on Feb. 8, even if the CCC had permitted us to build on the original site, soil conditions would actually have raised the house higher than on its slightly higher present site(with landscaping fill, its facades would look the same). And, due to the narrow curve of north Hinckley Pond,there is deeper screening between the new site and 6A, decreasing its visibility. 6)As the attached email correspondence shows,Mr. Theodores seriously misrepresents our several communications with him in saying that we told him the resiting was for"a dry basement and providing sufficient space for a septic system." He has consistently refused to acknowledge both Ed Kelley's professional assessment of the soil conditions and the CCC's "300'from the Pond,or as far as feasible"requirement suddenly imposed on us in December,though we explained these matters to him in conversation and in writing. Mr.Theodores' letter also fails to acknowledge that he lacks the training, expertise, and experience of CCC hydrogeologist Scott Michaud and Ed Kelley,who conferred on a site visit to our land. Mr. Theodores' "opinion that these reasons are not valid justifications for such an unfortunate decision" is severely compromised on its face by his wilful misrepresentation of what those "justifications" actually are--the more so as he declined our invitation to enlighten himself by discussing his concerns with Ed Kelley. 7)We deeply regret that our valued neighbor Mr. Theodores is so upset by our necessary site change that he has chosen to act against us by "ask[ing] that the Committee withdraw its [duly considered] Certificate of Appropriateness for this project" based on his abovementioned misrepresentations in public documents. His action has already caused us serious delay and considerable unnecessary added expense, it has unfairly jeopardized our reputation for fair dealing, and it threatens us with still more damage. We believe that Mr.Theodores's true but hidden concern, apparent in his emails(attached), is his personal love of the free view over our land that he obtained by cutting away the screening between our two lots(attached 1998 GIS Site Map--vegetation)etg ation)--land on which we will soon have paid some $40,000 in taxes these past few years without having any use of it ourselves. While we do not expect Mr. Theodores'thanks for the view he has enjoyed since arriving in our neighborhood around 1999-2000, we deeply regret his hostile action for its betrayal of neighborly spirit as well as the considerable damages and hardships his misrepresentations are causing us. H. Re Mr. Theodores's letter of February 1, 2006,read into the public record by Patricia Anderson on February 8,2006: 1)Para aphs 1-3: Mr.Theodores restates his "belief that the new location combined with the unusual height of this proposed building will permanently impair the natural beauty and character of this critical area" and repeats the same errors of omission and misrepresentation addressed above. 2) Paragraph 4: Mr. Theodores speculates, "The new location may require the removal of several old cedar trees from the very limited existing buffer, and removal of a section of original farm stone wall for driveway access to the garage." As Ed Kelley and the official site plan show,Mr. Theodores errs on all counts here: no cedar trees will be destroyed,no stone wall will be removed,the driveway enters at the existing opening. Again,he had only to consult Ed Kelley to avoid these misrepresentations in his letter that Patricia Anderson read aloud into the public record on February 8. Again he fails to mention his own earlier removal of landscape screening between his lot and ours. ti f 4 i i�%9�.-�t„ I 3) Paragraph 5: Mr. Theodores repeats that, for the reasons he has given,he "must now withdraw"his support and ask that"the Commission withdraw its issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness." While Mr. Theodores has every right to withdraw his support, neither his stated reasons nor his unstated but evident wish to preserve an absolutely clear view cattycorner across our property at our expense justify the withdrawal of our Certificate of Appropriateness that he demands. We hope the Committee will not permit his misrepresentations and erroneous speculations to work any further detriment to our project. We recognize that Mr. Theodores has worked on behalf of our neighborhood during his several years of residence. We would like to make the Committee aware that we too have worked to the neighborhood's benefit. John's parents joined neighbors to buy and donate the Audubon land that abuts the west edge of Lot 26/56 Sheperds Way, a gift of tremendous, enduring everyday benefit to the entire neighborhood. John himself aided the neighborhood effort to prevent residential development of neighborhood wetlands by submitting a statutory argument in his own name; more recently, he worked very hard to accommodate our house design to the OKH> D's mission of historic appropriateness and its siting to the Cape Cod Commission's ecological concerns. We believe that our contributions deserve to be acknowledged alongside Mr. Theodores's. We oppose in the strongest possible terms any notion that we are any less devoted than he to preserving our neighborhood's beauty and historic character. Finally,we sincerely apologize to Patricia Anderson and the Committee for our own error in believing that the CCC and not the OKHHD was ultimately responsible for the regulation of our house siting. This error--together with Patricia Anderson's statement at our July hearing(in response to Mr. Liddy's letter)that the OKHHD is not authorized to preserve neighbors'views, and her statement to our builder,Peter Johnson,that her concern was less our siting change than Mr. Theodores'(to us, shocking and very upsetting)claim that we were building a"substantially different" design--led us to telephone her in confusion on learning of Mr. Theodores'January 16 letter. When she replied that she could not "talk to [us] outside a public hearing,"we were forced to hire a lawyer to guide us through the intricate legal maze of the regulatory hierarchy(OKHHD, Building Dept., CCC); ensuing communication difficulties resulted in more confusion and filing delays that caused our case to be continued from February 8 yet excluded from the February 22 hearing. Meanwhile, our investment(at present well over$100,000) is at risk,the foundation now approved by the CCC and OKHHD sits unprotected, our builder's work schedule is disrupted, and we have, at best, lost our first summer in our new house. We beg Patricia Anderson and the Committee to recognize that our mistake was an honest one. We had never been sent, and still have never seen,the "yellow form" that(we learned on Feb. 9)the OKHHD instituted in January 2006 to guide Certificate holders in case of any changes. Our last Sept. 7-8 email query to Danielle St.Peter--always efficient,kind,and helpful--after our Certificate was issued led us to think(mistakenly but sincerely)that the Building Department would thenceforth be our regulatory guide(attached). Had we been informed then of the OKIH D's normal expectations and procedures,we would have taken pains to follow them exactly,as we always have tried our best to do. In no way did we ever intentionally "deceive" anyone, break or bend any rule, or violate the OKH1 D's right of oversight in our efforts to realize the dream house we have been working to build since 1988. Respectfully submitted, John Austin Christine Froula un FEB IS PM ?: C 4 c: Ted Theodores Attachments: 1)Timeline of site change communications with Ed Kelley,the Cape Cod Commission,and Ted Theodores(reconstructed from phone records, emails, etc.—available on request) 2)Email correspondence with Mr. Theodores: 5 emails in reverse chronological order,Jan. 11,2006 3)Explanation of minor design changes in Austin house from preliminary to final plans(Feb. 8 statement) 4) 1998 GIS Site Map--vegetation, showing landscape screening removed by Mr. Theodores 5) 1998 GIS Site Map--topography and house siting 6)Turn-of-the-century photographs of old Smith Farm on Hinckley Pond 7)Email query to Danielle St. Peter, Sept. 7-8, 2005 ij ^ � FElu 15 Psi Z Cl'3 S I O N 200E FEB 15 FM 2: 03 X-Original-To: cfroula@northwestern.edu Delivered-To: cfroula@merle.it.northwestern.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:14:58 -0600 To: "Ted Theodores" <ttheodores@comcast.net> From: Christine Froula<cfroula@northwestern.edu> Subject: Re: Explanation Cc: cfroula@northwestern.edu,john austin<jbamusic@yahoo.com> Ted, thanks for your reply. John did call you as soon as he had time when this matter arose, and it's too bad you didn't have time to talk sooner. I don't think the outcome could have been different, but perhaps we would all have felt better. As I mentioned, we too would have preferred the original location, but both Ed Kelley and the CCC gave reasons why we had to move it. Ed said even a slab house would have had problems further west. We are not site engineers and must rely on his expertise: he would not have moved it unless he had to, we did not want it moved unless it had to be, and we asked him to place it as far west as possible. I don't see what else we could have done--certainly nothing the CCC would have allowed, which vouchsafed to us for the first time on Dec 28 their idea that we needed a 300' distance between the septic and the Pond(3x state environmental law) . Do keep in mind my second email: Ed says the hole creates "an optical illusion" to which you're understandably reacting; he thinks the new site will not harm the value of your property. We do very much appreciate all the help you've given us, and we are glad that you have been able to enjoy pulling your boat over our field to the Pond. We look forward to being good neighbors with you. Best wishes, Christine and John At 01:06 PM 1/11/2006,you wrote: Just so you clearly understand my disappointment: I am philosophically very committed to property owner ' s rights, and I have been fully prepared for the visual impact of two new houses on your property for several years . I am glad that you have worked at minimizing that impact, and I appreciate your efforts to create a "consistent" architecture. You have the right to build there, and I believe I have conveyed my cooperation and support to you in very way that I could. My issue is that the new location of your house is h BLE FEB f 5 FM 2: 03 aesthetically much less appealing than the originally planned location, not only for me, but also for you. The house will be jammed tightly into one corner of the lot, with little surrounding space for landscaping. It would be much more typical of the other existing houses in the area, and would look so much nicer and blend more into the surrounding landscape if it were located farther from the lot lines . I think the decision to move it was unfortunate and based upon an expedient solution to an otherwise easily solvable issue. Dry basements can successfully be built in all types of soil, and you have more than enough open space for a septic system. Consequently, I believe the long term aesthetics, and property values, of our private little road have now been adversely altered rather than enhanced. I wish I could have collaborated on this with you prior to the unfortunate decision. Ted X-Original-To: cfroula@northwestern.edu Delivered-To: cfroula@merle.it.northwestern.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:47:26 -0600 To: "Ted Theodores" <Theodores@comcast.net> From: Christine Froula<cfroula@northwestern.edu> Subject: Ed Kelley bulletin Cc:john austin<jbamusic@yahoo.com>, cfroula@northwestem.edu Ted, We called Ed Kelley about your concerns, and he just returned our call. When I told him you were worried that our house would harm the value of your property, he said, "I wouldn't think so"; that the size of the hole creates "an optical illusion" that makes the house seem much bigger than it is, because "there may be 6-8' all around it" for backfill; and, accordingly, misleadingly huge piles of clay heaped around it, so that we'll have a dry basement. Feel free to talk with him if you see him down there; he said he'd be glad to explain'to you. Best wishes, Christine and John ----- Original Message ----- From: Christine Froula To: Ted Theodores LUIS FEB 15 F° 0� f Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 10:17 AM Subject: Explanation Dear Ted, We are very sorry to hear that you are disappointed by the siting of our house. Our architect had originally thought it should be where it now is; Ed Kelley thought it would be better in the middle. We went with Ed's view, but further test holes showed the soil was not as well suited as on the higher ground. The CCC also wants us to put the leaching field as far back as possible: 300' if possible (300' is impossible) or as far away as feasible. We could accommodate them only by haing the house further up the field on the higher ground. John went out in November to site it with Ed, and they put it in the middle of the field, where we wanted it. When Ed later told us that further soil tests showed he had to move it east, we asked him to keep it as far west as possible. We called you as soon as we knew that it had to be moved, and the outline of its location has been visible for some time now. So we wonder whether perhaps you may be reacting to the very large size of the foundation hole (which it much bigger than the house itself because it has to be backfilled around the foundation). As you know, our house will be about as small as anyone would be likely to build on such a property--smaller, probably, than 99% of what might be put there. We are looking forward to having you as a neighbor, and we will be happy to collaborate in landscaping plans that protect your privacy and ours. I'm sure if our situations were reversed, it would be disappointing for us to have to lose the free clear views we had enjoyed for many years over our neighbors'property. All we can say is we have done our best in working with every aspect of this complicated situation; and that if we were in your position, we would have to accept that our neighbors' right to site their house preempts our right to a view over their land. Please let us know if you have further questions and concerns, and Our very best wishes to you and all your family, Christine and John At 06:37 AM 1/11/2006, you wrote: John & Chris, Now that I have had a chance to take a close look, I am sorry to tell you that I am greatly troubled by the last minute change in the siting of your house. It was not a minor relocation, some 40 feet or more in my direction and about 10 to 15 feet toward the Shepherds "':`' F EB 15 Pf` 2: 00 right-of-way, and now very tightly squeezed into the corner of your lot . I cannot imagine that you would be pleased with that siting either since it barely provides space for access or landscaping. With all that beautiful land available, I 'm sure the siting could have been made much more desirable for me and for you. Ted � n I Statement of John Austin and Christine Froula We hope the Committee understands that we had no intent to ignore or bend any rules in regard to the site change and the minor design adjustments that occurred in realizing the "preliminary exterior plans" that the Guidelines require for the Certificate of Appropriateness. The Cape Cod Commission asked for and received the four final elevations when we applied for their Hardship Exemption. Their Staff Report of December 29, 2005 states: "The proposed structure is traditional in form and materials. . . . the design is consistent with the general historic character of the district." The CCC Report recommended approval "provided the leaching field be relocated" as far away from Hinckley Pond as feasible. This was done, and the CCC granted a Hardship Exemption in January, 2006 for the re-sited house with septic system. The site change is dictated not by our wish but by two factors: (1)the discovery of soil conditions that make building on the original site impractical and ill-advised; (2)the Cape Cod Commission's requirement that the septic system be 300' away from the Pond, or as far away as feasible. Edward Kelley can provide details on these matters at the Feb. 8 meeting. These conditions are not of our making and indeed go against our original preference. We had no choice. When we inquired whether we had to notify the OKHHD, we were told we just had to file an official site plan when the project was complete. If this was bad advice, we can only say that we intended to follow the rules and believed we were doing so. We believed in all good faith that the Certificate of Appropriateness issued on the basis of the required "preliminary exterior plans" covered such minor adjustments as normally occur when architects and engineers translate preliminary into final plans. The OKHHD Guidelines' requirement of"preliminary exterior plans" is not qualified by any requirement that final plans be submitted as well. Had there been such a procedure, or had we been informed of any such expectation, we would certainly have complied. As it happened, we were advised that ours were minor changes that did not substantially alter the design, hence required no further vetting by the OKHHD. Again, if this was bad advice, we can only say that we were trying to follow the rules. Here are the reasons for the changes: 1. 2' extension of garage. Our architect strongly recommended that the garage we had first drawn at 22' be extended to the standard 24'two-car garage as more in keeping with a 2.63 acre lot and the neighborhood, improving proportion and balance on the N-S facades, allowing easier access between garage and house, and enabling the west garage door to open fully without hitting the stairwell. Without this change, the house would in effect have only a 1.5-car garage; that would tend to increase use of the driveway as parking space and detract from the house's everyday neat look. 2. Change in window size (same style, design, quality,placement). Our neighbor Ted Theodores, who represented us at an OKHHD hearing in July, expressed satisfaction with our design with one qualification: he said that if it were his house he would enlarge the windows on facades that have views. 2PC%S FE3 15 PMI 2' 03 Our architect agreed. The OKHHD committee also pointed out on July 13 that one room lacked a second egress. In working from the preliminary design to final plans, we addressed these issues by specifying Loewen's next width up for the E-S-W windows. This change allows double-hung windows and code egress throughout the house, improving function, safety, and appearance without altering the design. 3. The addition of a stairwell window. To light the stairs for safety and to balance the S facade, we added a stairwell window. 4. Slight increase in height(under 1'). Our architect and engineer recommended that the attic floor joists rest on the plate to increase structural soundness and have usable attic space. Although this change adds slightly to the height,the final height will be the same or if anything, a little lower than that of our 2004 design. Since the 2004 design was sited on higher ground than the present house is on its new site; since no one ever mentioned the house's height or 2.5 storeys as an issue during the six OKHHD hearings of 2004-2005 (indeed the old Smith farm photos we submitted on June 22 show 2.5 storey buildings, as does the neighborhood at present); and since the"Guidelines" specify pitch but not height, we understood this structural improvement as normal tweaking in the translation of"preliminary" to final plans. The height remains, of course, well within code, far below the maximum. Please note that the height reflects the house's ecologically aware design: natural cooling (ceiling fans and attic) and efficient heating(radiant floor heat). It has no A/C,nor the necessary A/C ductwork. In the design submitted in June 2005,we did our best to accommodate all the Committee's concerns about our 2004 design. In working from the required"preliminary exterior plans"to final plans,we took care to preserve the design that the Committee had judged appropriate. When we inquired on Sept. 7 when we would receive the Certificate of Appropriateness, Danielle St. Peter replied, "The Certificates don't get sent out,they get sent to the building department so that they are there when the contractor comes in to pull a building permit and so there is no delay waiting for a signoff. It has already been sent over" (email, Sept. 8). From that we understood, or misunderstood,that the regulation of our project had now shifted to the Building Department, which had all the required documents. We regret our part in this misunderstanding, and we would like to emphasize that at no time did we ever intend to evade the OKHHD's authority. We respectfully submit that our design is fundamentally unchanged and remains fully in keeping with the historic character of the OKHHD, as the December 2005 CCC Report confirms. Sincerely, John B. Austin Christine Froula ,�_.�,.F��,,; � fit` 3-„i rt„. �. s'1 J 1 l.' ................. ........ ..........�—*----T----r STANDARD LEGEND .. ........ ccam=nus IM • o u otowbotntuty X 1, mar MAK"seta x-" eIr aim*w,t l�t.r.q .•' ...... '� 5: at t' , .+6 j• '•�, ::LN^-"r"- ................ PAW10 ow X PIT= A ua "Min Inirs 14, QS .......IV-, ... ......... XIA Wit vmut tau mAat x1m of SPIN UVA" SvKt Wil Ius ta too RAW x6A ....... YfUrt"t PW smt Irm wS ...... .... ..... ..... sm"No mm _2tr~ KIM I NO X%14 if Q. valoms/slumn 'Sp" I:........... Aii- . ........ 1,411 A� :tls ............. ....................... ICE MAP I X1111.6 6 , c k3 -1 11 r_i t.s 1...9 6101,111.4c 11'awm.snt I *4U A, I ffni 2w I oa-M FEET ,4A JY 7T ........... so .......... xg.61 x U; .......... IL730 Iwo Wal"I v E { FEB IS Pl-i 2: 03 STANDARD LEGEND it N . ,... ��r+ " .. ,. i.�t' CS •' �-' � ' EA6'[:d lrl5fi _.ManvY!�1K �.. � MitoN4 W'1 M ROM Mmul r rant ca!aa:r uu : m ... ,.• k � ': ^f �a tg rOCf GMCU.:Im m ' _ i sma f'.!H?UM f� flWl �r2&� iFf1WtIRi M4d r v� DES;a hXfD[f Dmw .y SITE MAP . I� s a HNS•^.t><blf.M Y1M n.MN�.'R su ameK!sts S } .� NYrtw Ww�kapl0i ttv)KfW+t i. -xar + r ttm'nart�mapSprDd�slput2`v?dqn M.31.1_M 03 t 414 c .e�e��� - / _-/'a�.w.e.�m..i..RarMa.-.._ �.:+....��4_.F1'g^_,^:w�r�+++bw.+..�+..�..-xsairsn..t-..err•...-�r -p��.wii..ev,�.,.r-..,^�_i tl�1i,:�t'i^k i t , x r. Z � 27 , yta - ° Z I _ I a a t L s 3:4a I i •-t a .a r a ,x k ', 5 ' •., � rt. t yr� s-,4-Yts„�-" ���`��"��E',�"3��^.y�y�9.�' }',+,�1� �'4� �� s��'����71`����°hy�tw'ye`���' .y�. I �ar,s"''r` '}a, CA 0 _ s L �fr'+��'`SV��� .fLliN �M""£✓ r' �� >s' f ���.�'�t��jy,G'Y%'W'€�3t��.��' � -� a•�°'`7-r �"`�+�.-,{'� �, ^;.,ice � -�„� -•'F.�.� ._:'E �, ,i -� .4� �'(,�-R-�/ • Gam,./{/ G`�'`'`1 �. � �� r 9 �, I i - I C o FED lJ ( ��I.i Cl t R. I ---Y , 1`5 ro, it 411 I®R ISM 11Qlo�w.e�+d-W„�_ e c .� E „-���.��� r....v = 1•• �a"m�;.w.,t z r �.:1 ��:5 r . ow; Oi- RE IF -Ate p!U, F'R op L : r LB 13 � �l J - ail v -Original-To: cfroula@merle.it.northwestem.edu Delivered-To: cfroula@merle.it.northwestem.edu Subject: RE: Certificate of Approval query Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 08:43:39 -0400 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Certificate of Approval query Thread-Index: AcWOJgZ7y03H8/ObSFm/f1ERN+yNmwAS9+Vg From: "St.Peter, Danielle" <Danielle.St.Peter@town.barnstable.ma.us> To: "Christine Froula" <;froula@northwestern.edu> X-OriginalArrivalTime:,08 Sep 2005 12:53:33.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[521 C2770:01 C5B474] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAQ= X-White-List-Member: TRUE Hi Christine, The Certificates don't get sent out, they get sent to the building department so that they are there when the contractor comes in to pull a building permit and so there is no delay waiting for a signoff. It has already been sent over. Thanks Danielle -----Original Message----- From: Christine Froula [mailto:cfroulagnorthwestem.edu] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:36 PM To: St.Peter, Danielle Subject: Certificate of Approval query Dear Danielle, Just a quick query to ask whether our certificate has been sent out yet? Will it come to our address here? 2801 Girard Avenue Evanston IL 60201 Thank you, Christine and John Re: Austin House, Lot 26 Sheperds Way, Barnstable 22106 FEB 15 Fri 2: 03 aFVi3laN i* I Roma, Paul From: Etsten, Jackie Sent: Monday--January 23 2006 2:20 PM To: Pat Anderson (pjonesanderson@hotmail.com) Cc: Weil, Ruth; Broadrick, Tom; Roma, Paul; Perry, Tom; Mackey, Patty Subject: Austin house Site AND building plan changes David Austin called today. In a lengthy conversation about the new location of his house I advised him that it was his responsibility to get the revised plans approved by othe CCC to the town departments - Building, Health and OKH, and that had not happened. He seemed unaware the foundation permit had been issued based on the original 8/05 OKH Site Plan approved by the OKH. I suggested that he provide information on the elevation of the top of the constructed foundation to the OKH, that if he did decide to provide this information, it should be on a signed, stamped statement from the surveyor, and that if controversy ensured regarding the location and height and visibility they could run a balloon test. These were not requirements, just different ways of providing information. Towards the end of the conversation he brought up the issue of changes in the architectural plans. I asked him if he had submitted revised architectural plans to the CCC, he said "yes" but thought the changes were minor. However, apparently he thought the neighbor who was complaining had addressed these changes in his letter. I told him that it would be advisable to submit any plan revisions to the OKH to make a determination as to whether the changes were consistent with 8/05 approval but reminded him that the only issue at present that has been referred to the OKH is a change in the site plan. Any change in the architectural plans that was different from the 8/15 approved architectural plans would need to be advertised and noticed separately (or together) , but there may not be time for the Feb 8 meeting where the only issue scheduled and noticed, is a change in the Site Plan. Jackie 1 1`ti . ., afl. S;� X +r• x�i•a 1 - 3.S 'c,�r r t . t r-t --r y �.f"'�..,x„{y r " i ��' z J 1 Y.y '.� a 1 y - 4 1 a tr r c <- t r 3 � �. P•F ! Sa � it' .YJ o-+. - x t � + � 1 t #",}tr 9.• v =DEEP>ARFT�MEl 1T{OF HUALr 1�«H. S�AFET zyAN�D. b �EN'TA SERV/ICES s } x z K o F y,l BU�ILD�I G-',,I SI�OFN�, eU7 l - �_- \ `(frf'}R 4��y` vS p � .,r/1 [1�� � Yl J h1 cl+ YA � 'L<l '-rftorn.L1 �i,;�`j� S' \ '\ 0�� � Yt� fi F Ar E. t. }j` t / r , lw� �r� �. 1f i � xar �+ _'�r b -F t .� L� s J-• 'J �..-'< r�'HIS tST�R"t��ICTI�RE`A�D�/OR.`P 5;;pIfS+ES t3S,`B�EEN FISPNI ;�E� TEED AN,�D i« �E�F®�'LL' n�`N�G�TV IO�LA��I�O?N,;S ` ' I,�� i > r� ,OIF T E Bi�JIL_D1I�N�G�C��) `E AND/,OR�Z, W ww"" �� ME ?f r.77- * '�/�" �t -� it _i//��yx1 � v i���//r /+7J.,�y Zx r/rA�v+•.�r+.�, �f-.,(,��t` �T s..: r /� � F+)y V� �.1.� � LT � l�.r �x♦ f I�S.C_�YI 1 "�r V % �� � ?' � RR �"•��� ry �•{/v l � t•` xs 4- ^'fit rt�hry ;1 '...e v r WOW- Ann f T 131 F s 1 ,i zr-,r� �'�-r.'r �" eta. . ♦ .t'' .r... =r ,3.,� i�.� b<�YUA+ �Hs— ,RLBY�sN; TIE�I°ED'T'°dCT L k 'kx S+r' �O A'DDI vI N�'� aW O 5 vLaLti B,E, ,�a OUNCES Fit N'°i'TPN`THSLPMIS�S;,(O�RT, �'� T� o u McIS�Es F !� CCtiP'ID t` T,ITuIE jA�B�OV�F`VzO�LA�T4� ©NSS; k j .+qd �+:-.�..t.>, rr tiy+nry� 3� � t"k7 p t S Tt f�f b sr i� A�N`Y P�E�RS NS REAM0vj ISj N�'©TI{C�E,W S g �'H2ORIyZA I�1r�1�'S�HcA BLE �'A jLEPS5SW-TV o r' `F�I� `TY ENO ! ✓�I,i'OO�N ,EE,HgUN�R��D�D � A�RR� *r F,Tir 4 r a_j.l-,F !'zr r xt f �l : ry ih r r. r Fr •r. :fin t plot- - _AN 7.sN> i r�i* - \ Y1« Y.�ry.=rMl.eW�aq�'1�. r,1,' �y�•9���-�+�� � � .y s, ~� b'" r y N a- 14 Y " A , � w a� 00 _ '`* P r•� :�� ,Zt ..r., � '.r.�'r: �+F _f••: �N".N': "� ,,,p,° ."�' ' �'. `f -�''- r� .F N " , Y j, ~'► (.* � aa,�•�i pyy:;. 4�Y, .#±+. #�'.�,� X" ` ,�� '� ::.a�F"' l�a�r ��y*�,�,� � _' it ip 4' 6�r� - �� �.rE,..:.., C .• '�„ ,. �"J ,;fir ., � ill 7k� _ Y r r~ a• . •`. '•�6 t. "-*f'ir' 'a .+ e ` '� ,.1. { �,Mr_. R.. ✓, A4r'A'+„ .,r " � Ak, �'��i��#� T'.. ., hr��• �, •' rZ a! a�� ��� Y..•e� _ -A1��f�ir ', 58 Sheperds Way, Barn 1 /20/06. t 1 J P x a , a g x. ' d ' k- lk c y .i i .; Grp _ `-- _ Wil r r v s` Y rs P x Plow >, g: K- Q' I " V C> 'r 58 Sheperds- Way, Barn 1 20 06 Roma, Paul From: Broadrick, Tom Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 9:58 AM To: Weil, Ruth Cc: Smith, Robert; Roma, Paul; Niedzwiecki, Paul Subject: RE:Austin property 50 shepherds Way Absolutely. . .this is what I meant when I said Tom Perry and I had chatted about it yesterday. He was waiting to see how what was in the ground varied from what was approved by OKH. So looks like Paul Roma is already on top of it. Tom -----Original Message----- From: Weil, Ruth Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 9:55 AM To: Broadrick, Tom Cc: Smith, Robert; Roma, Paul; Niedzwiecki, Paul Subject: RE: Austin property 50 shepherds Way I just got off the phone with Jackie on this. You and she should coordinate with Paul Roma. If the building permit was issued based on the OKH plan and the construction is proceeding at variance with that plan, then a stop work order may be in order. Should legal questions arise on this issue, Bob Smith should be consulted. Ruth -----Original Message----- From: Broadrick, Tom Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 9:39 AM To: Weil, Ruth Subject: RE: Austin property 50 shepherds Way Good. . .do you want me to follow up or is this on the right path now? Tom -----Original Message----- From: Weil, Ruth Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 9:23 AM To: Broadrick, Tom Subject: FW: Austin property 50 shepherds Way FYI -----Original Message----- From: Etsten, Jackie Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 9:12 AM To: Weil, Ruth Cc: Roma, Paul Subject: FW: Austin property 50 shepherds Way Good morning Ruth, this is a FYI regarding another controversy of the moment, no action requested. The Austin's new house is in the DCPC and received an exemption from the CCC based on a different site plan than that approved by the OKH in August 2005. The house location on the site plan approved by the CCC is 70 feet east of the OKH approved location, where it may be higher and more visible. A permit was issued for a foundation that has been . installed according to the revised plan that was approved by the CCC but never submitted 1 j to any of the town agencies including OKH, Building and Health. The foundation has been installed; Pat Anderson has requested a stop work order until the OKH issues are resolved. The revised site plan is on the OKH agenda for Feb 8 with a 14 day appeal period from the following day when Patty files the decision with the Town Clerk. Jackie -----Original Message----- From: Etsten, Jackie Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:24 PM To: Roma, Paul Cc: Pat Anderson (pjonesanderson@hotmail.com) ; Mackey, Patty Subject: Austin property 50 shepherds Way Hi Paul, I will come and see you first thing Friday morning, but just in case you are out in the field before I come in, Pat Anderson called and asks that work cease on the above property until OKH has acted on the new Site Plan and remember, there is an OKH appeal period. I will check on the schedule for the OKH hearing tomorrow, Thanks Jackie 2 L of,Bs CAPE COD COMMISSION O$f 3225 MAIN STREET "�U r !��' b)ARN 5 f."+ L E P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA02630 8 zEb J,� 35 . '9ssACH13StiS FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk®capecodcommission.org ~0��`ISfQN TO: Town of Barnstable.Town Clerk,Building Inspector, Town Planner, Planning Board, Board of Appeals, Conservation Commission, Board of Health FROM: Gail Hanley, Clerk of the Commission SUBJECT: John Austin and Christine Froula Residence District of Critical Planning Concern Hardship Exemption Decision DATE: January.13, 2006 Enclosed please find a copy of the John Austin and Christine Froula Residence District of Critical Planning Concern Hardship Exemption Decision that was approved by the . Cape Cod Commission on January 12, 2006. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. t� - �.r °F 8 �� CAPE COD COMMISSION 3225 MAIN STREET * * P.O. BOX 226 BARNSTABLE,MA 02630 �r�ssACHUSti FAX(508)3 2-31136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org Date: January 12, 2006 -To: John Austin and Christine Froula From: Cape Cod Commission RE: District of Critical Planning Concern (DCPC) Hardship Exemption Cape Cod Commission Act, Section 23 Applicant: Mr. John Austin, Ms. Christine Froula 2801 Girard Ave. Evanston,IL 60201 Project: 56 Shepherds Way, Barnstable, MA Project#: . HDEX#05032 Certificate: Lot 26,Plan 20950F, Certificate# 170371 DECISION OF THE CAPE COD COMMISSION SUMMARY The Cape Cod Commission(Commission)hereby approves the Hardship Exemption(the "Project") application from the Pond Village District of Critical Planning Concern(DCPC) Iimited�roratorium for the John Austin and Christine Fouls residency at 56 Shepherds Way in Barnstable,MA pursuant to Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act(Act),c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended. The decision is rendered pursuant to a vote of the Commission on January 12, 2006. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of construction of a 2,576 square foot single-family residence on a 2.63-acre lot at 56 Shepherds Way, off Scudder Lane and to the north of Route 6A, in Barnstable, MA. The site is on the northern end of Hinkley's Pond. The property has been in the family since 1948. ,Hardship Exemption Decision—Mr.John Austin and Ms.Christine Froula Pond Village DCPC-Barnstable,MA January 12,2006 °e i -PROCEDURAL HISTORY The applicant filed a Hardship Exemption application from the Pond Village DCPC on December 13, 2005. The application was deemed complete on December 13, 2005. A duly noticed public hearing was held on January 3, 2006 at the Cape Cod Commission offices in Barnstable, MA. Following the hearing,the subcommittee voted unanimously to recommend , to the full Commission that the Project be granted a Hardship Exemption. A'final public hearing was held before the full Commission on January 12, 2006. At this hearing the Commission voted unanimously to grant the Hardship Exemption. MATERIALS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD By Applicant: • Revised site plans dated December 30,2005 Copy of the Barnstable Bukhng permt'dated Decembers 19;'2005 `17 Close-up of site map showing test site west of house site • Parcel map from the town of Barnstable •Email dated December 30, 2005 • Email dated December 29,2005 Email and additional information December 27, 2005 • Hardship Application dated December 13,2005 • Email dated December 12, 2005 • Email dated December 9, 2005 By the Town of Barnstable • Minutes of the Barnstable Planning Board meeting dated December 12, 2005 • Email from Tom Broadrick dated January 3, 2006. • Email from Tom Broadrick dated December 15, 2005 By Commission Staff • Letter dated December 13, 2005 • Staff Report dated December 28,2005 By Interested Parties: , , . _ _ _ • Letter from Neil and Sara Ringler dated December 30,2005 • Letter from Neil and Sara Ringler dated December 28,2005 • Letter from Dorothy Carver dated December 19,2005 Letter from Ted Theodores dated December 19, 2005 The application and notices of public hearings relative thereto,the Commission staff s notes, exhibits and correspondence,the transcript and minutes of meetings and hearings and all written submissions received in the course of our proceedings are incorporated into the record by reference. Hardship Exemption Decision-John Austin and Christine Froula Pond Village DCPC-Barnstable,MA January 12,2006 2 I TESTIMONY Hearing#1 —January 3, 2006,Cape Cod Commission, Barnstable MA Martha Twombly, staff planner, discussed the Pond Village DCPC history and the location of the property within the DCPC boundaries, adjacent to Hinkley's Pond. She noted that findings for the hardship exemption must be made. She said the three issues of concern in the DCPC included water quality in Hinkley's Pond,water quality in Barnstable Harbor, and community character. regarding historic and scenic.elements of the neighborhood. She noted that the Austins were well along in their permitting prior to the town nominating the DCPC, having begun Old King's Highway (OKH)review in the fall of 2004, and receiving their OKH permit on August 10,2005. She noted the Austins had made investments to date of approximately $100,000, and said they were concerned that further delays would potentially cause the loss of their contractor. She noted that Mr. Kelley, land surveyor for the Austins,provided new site plans,today that showed both the house location and the septic system had been moved north,to a location about 215' away from Hinkley's Pond. Ms. Twombly,explained that the DCPC docision made a recommendation that septic systems be outside of the 300' buffer to the pond as a conservative measure to protect water quality, while the state regulations require 50' and the town bylaw is currently set at 100'. Scott Michaud, staff hydrologist,explained concerns related to how septic systems may have an effect on water quality in surface ponds. He noted that there was no other location on the Austin site for the septic system because of clay soils and the property boundary. He noted that the 300' buffer was a stricter policy recommended by the DCPC guidelines until the research could be . completed that would further define the geology of the area and determine what distance would . be best in order to protect water quality over the long term. Ms..Twombly noted that regarding community character,the size and scale of the proposed house is modest, and consistent with the general architecture and materials of the area. She stated that the staff believed the Applicants met the criteria for a hardship exemption. Ed Kelley, engineer, spoke on behalf of the Austins, and stated that the.foundation/septic permit had been approved and issued by the town on December 19,2005. He cited the location of the test pits on the site plans submitted to staff on January 2,2006, and said that they found clay soils that were unsuitable for septic imother areas on the site. He also expressed that in working with the Austins for five years,he found them to be very conservation minded. ; Testimony from the public: Mr. Steven Berglund,abutter, said that the family is conservation minded and stated he supports the hardship exemption request. Mr. Joe Dugas spoke in support of the Austin's request, and said he supports the DCPC tool. Hardship Exemption Decision—John Austin and Christine Froula Pond Village DCPC-Barnstable,MA January 12,2006 3 Comments and.questions from the.subcommittee: Mr. Crowell expressed concern that the Austins implied that the DCPC was being,imposed by the Commission, which is not the case. He said that he believed the Applicants met the technical requirements of hardship exemption from the DCPC limited moratorium. Mr. Hogan asked if an innovative septic system was considered. Mr. Michaud answered that these systems remove nitrogen,but not phosphorous, which is the concern in Hinkley's Pond. Mr. Doherty was concerned about other potential hardship requests that may come forward in a piecemeal manner. However,he stated that the Applicant initiated their permitting well in advance of the DCPC in good faith and supported the hardship exemption. Mr. Olsen said he believed the Applicant meets the standards for a hardship exemption. JURISDICTION The Project is located within the boundaries of the Pond Village DCPC, which was nominated by the Cape Cod Commission for designation as a DCPC on July.15,2005. The Project is seeking exemption from a limited moratorium on all building permits,which is currently in effect as part of the DCPC, as the proposed project is a new single-family home. FINDINGS The Commission has considered the application of Mr. Austin and Ms. Ftoula for the proposed Project, and based on consideration of such application and_upon the information presented at the public hearing and submitted for the record,makes the following Findings pursuant to Section 23 of the Act: General Findings: G1. The proposed Project is an approximately2600 square foot single-family home, including the basement and 2-car garage. G2. The Project will be'built in accordance with the following plans: Elevation plans dated July 14, 2005, and site plans by Edward Kelley received January 3, 2006. G3. The Project is consistent with local zoning and the Barrstable Focal'Comprehensive' Plan, and received a foundation permit from the Barnstable Building Department on December 19, 2005. The project had received a Disposal System Construction Permit from the Health Department#2005-574 for a 3-bedroom capacity septic system on November 11, 2005. G4. The Applicant has expended approximately $100,000 in design, construction and permitting fees, and planned to begin construction in November 2005. G5. The Applicants began their local permitting through the Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Committee in the fall of 2004. Hardship Exemption Decision-John Austin and Christine Froula Pond Village DCPC.-Barnstable,MA January 12,2006 4 G6. Mr. Austin and Ms. Froula received Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Committee approval on August 10, 2005 after the nomination of the DCPC had been accepted for consideration by the Cape Cod Commission, initiating a limited moratorium on development activities within the District. G7. The Applicant had expended a significant amount of time and money, and completed a large part of the permitting process,prior to the nomination of the DCPC. G8. Mr. Austin and Ms. Froula have demonstrated a need to begin construction as soon as. possible to prevent the loss of their contractor. In addition, further delays would prevent the completion of the house prior to summer 2006, causing additional financial hardship in requiring the family to rent a home. G9. A Hardship Exemption may be granted to the Applicant without derogating from the intent or purpose of the Act, and without detriment to the public good. Water Resource Findings: NMI. Protection of groundwater and Hinkley's Pond water quality is a principal goal of the Pond Village DCPC. Fresh surface-waters such as Hinkley's Pond tend to be sensitive to phosphorus additions. WR2. A development moratorium is currently in place which prohibits building in the DCPC until the Town can develop and enact regulations that adequately protect Hinckley's Pond. The applicant seeks an exemption from the development moratorium in order to construct a 2-bedroom home on a 2.63-acre parcel situated on the northern shoreline of Hinckley's Pond. The septic system was designed for 3 bedrooms. WR3. Pond Village generally has access to the public water supply although homes in the vicinity of the project site use private wells. The site engineer, Edward Kelley has indicated that the Town intends to extend the water main to the project and nearby properties currently using private wells. WR4. The project results in.a nitrogen concentration in groundwater of 2.4 ppm pursuant to methodology of CCC TB'91-001. This concentration is below the regional 5-ppm nitrogen loading standard promulgated by the RPP and recommended in the CCC DCPC decision rendered on July 15, 2005 for enactment as a DCPC regulation by the Town. WR5. The CCC DCPC decision recommends that the Town enact a regulation that provides a 300-foot setback of subsurface septic and stormwater disposal from Hinkley's Pond until the pond's watershed can be delineated and a phosphorus-loading assessment provides information necessary to establish a more appropriate setback. Although regional-scale water table interpretations show groundwater beneath the site flowing away from the pond, local water-level information necessary to refine these interpretations and determine whether groundwater flowing beneath the site discharges to Hinckley's Pond is not available at this time.. Hardship Exemption Decision—John Austin and Christine Froula Pond Village DCPC-Barnstable,MA January 12,2006 5 4 WR6. The project's potential to contribute phosphorus to Hinckley's Pond with septic discharge to groundwater was a primary concern during consideration of the exemption request. Other potential sources of phosphorus, such as lawn fertilizers, were not explicitly considered because project plans did not contain plans for turf. The CCC DCPC decision recommends that the Town encourage the establishment of a community-supported education program for the DCPC to disseminate information that encourages the use of best lawn-and landscape-management practices protective of water quality. WR7. The CCC DCPC decision recommends that the town require technology capable of removing phosphorus from project wastewater where an appropriate setback from. Hinkley's Pond cannot be provided. Only one septic-system type is approved.in Massachusetts on a limited experimental basis, and initial and on-going costs of deploying, monitoring and maintaining the system can be substantial. NVR8. Requirement of a 300-foot septic setback from Hinckley's Pond is not possible at the site due to its size without rendering the lot undevelopable. The site is characterized by silt and clay loam underlain by medium sand. Siting of the septic system is most favorable toward the eastern portion of the lot where the top of the sand increases in elevation and is closer to grade. The Applicant's original proposal sited the already permitted septic system leaching trench approximately 185 feet from Hinkley's Pond. To take advantage of shallower depths to sand in the eastern side of the property and to maximize the setback from Hinckley's Pond, plans were revised and submitted to provide a 215-foot setback from Hinckley's Pond. According to site engineer Mr. Kelley, additional investigation may allow for an additional 30 to 40 feet of setback. Considering the merit of the hardship request and the site's physical constraints,this setback is appropriate and does not derogate from the intent or purposes of the Act or cause substantial detriment to the public good. Community Character Findings: CCL The proposed residence is located within the Old Kings Highway Regional Historic District and has already been reviewed and approved by Barnstable Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Committee,receiving a Certificatg.of Appropriateness on August 10, 2005. CC2. The proposed building is a modest,two-story,single-family home with a two-car garage. ' The proposed structure is traditional in form and materials and, as seen from across the pond, is broken down into three distinct massings: a 2-story central mass, a 2-story side ell, and:a one-story porch. As such, the design is consistent with the general historic character of the district. CONCLUSION Based on the Findings above,the Commission hereby concludes: Hardship Exemption Decision—John Austin and Christine Froula Pond Village DCPC-Barnstable,MA January 12,2006 6 P r 1.) The Applicant has demonstrated that a hardship exists in conforming with all of the requirements of the Pond Village DCPC. A literal enforcement of the provisions of the Act would involve additional delays that would represent financial and personal hardships to the Applicant, and 2.)That relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Act. The relief granted relates directly to the nature of the identified hardship and is the minimum necessary to address the hardship. The Cape Cod Commission hereby approves the application of Mr.John Austin and Ms. Christine Froula as a Hardship Exemption from the Pond Village DCPC building moratorium pursuant to Section 23 of the Act, c. 716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended, for the proposed single-family home at 56 Shepherds Way, Barnstable,MA. i � z bG Alan Platt, Chair date Commonwealth of Massachusetts ,1 County of Barnstable On this FZ+day of January., 2006,before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared Alan Platt,proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification,which were erso4al / nowle e , to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that he signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. 4 ' f Notary Public 4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts - My Commission Expires: �O / Hardship Exemption Decision—John Austin and Christine Froula Pond Village DCPC-Barnstable,MA January 12,2006 TOWN OF B�' RNSTABLE Ted Theodores 50 Shepherds Way 2006 JAN 18 PM 3: 30 Barnstable, MA 02630 Patricia Anderson January 16, 2006 glYl$10N Chair Old Kings Highway Historic District Commission Hyannis, MA 02601 Re : John Austin and Christine Froula Proposed Residence .58 Shepherds Way,- Barnstable, MA 02630 f) During 2005 I supported the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the above project . Recently, I became aware of a significant change in the location of the proposed home on the site, and that the house being built is substantially different from the plans that I was shown. I now firmly believe that these last-minute changes will have an adverse aesthetic impact on character of this critical area. The new location places the proposed house tightly in one very visible corner of the 2 . 6 acre lot with no natural buffer and little surrounding space for landscaping. Its former location was more centrally located on its lot, and more consistent with other homes in this area. Further, the new location places the house, already an unusually tall structure, on a substantially higher elevation making it more visible from Route 6A. According to the owners, this last-minute decision to relocate the house was for the purpose of assuring a dry basement and providing sufficient space for a septic system. It is my opinion that these reasons are not valid justifications for such an unfortunate decision. While I did support the initial proposal, I must now withdraw my support and ask that the Commission withdraw its issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness for this project . Sincerely, <ttheodores@comcast.net> Phone & Fax 508.362.3553 °F BAs� CAPE COD COMMISSION � O 'yam r 3225 MAIN STREET •l OMN 0F BARN31AALE v V7,, M P.O.'BOX 226 BARNSTABLE, MA 02630 ys (508)362-3828 2005 DEC 15 PM 12: 50 SACHU FAX(508)362-3136 E-mail:frontdesk@capecodcommission.org UV-1S1() HEARING NOTICE CAPE COD COMMISSION The Cape Cod Commission will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday,January 3,2006 at 6:30 p.m.at the Cape Cod Commission, 3225 Main Street,Route 6A,Barnstable,MA. The following project has been submitted to the Cape Cod Commission as a District of Critical Planning Concern (DCPC)Hardship Exemption under Section 23 of the Cape Cod Commission Act,c.716 of the Acts of 1989, as amended. The project will be considered for a DCPC Hardship Exemption. This notice is being published as required by Section 5 of the Cape Cod Commission Act. Project Name: John Austin and Christine Froula Residence Project Applicant: John Austin and Christine Froula Project Location: � 58.Sheperds Way (Lot#26),+Barnstable, MA , Project Description: Construction of an approximately 2,800 s.f single-family home on approximately 2.63 acres consisting of a two-story dwelling with a basement and 2-car garage on slab, septic system for 3-bedrooms, within the boundaries of the Pond Village DCPC. Anyone.wishing to testify orally will be welcome to do so. Written comments may also be submitted at the hearing,or delivered or mailed.to the Cape Cod Commission, P.O. Box 226, 3225 Main Street,:Barnstable�MA 02630 for receipt on or before the date of the hearing or until the record is closed. The application,plans and relevant documents may be viewed by,calling the Commission office at(508) 362-3828 to schedule an appointment between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. If you need a reasonable accommodation,please let us know by December 28,2005. Please call for more information and to make your request. ell i Roma, Paul From: Broadrick, Tom Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:48 AM To: 'john austin'; 'cfroula@northwestern.edu' Cc: Weil, Ruth; Swiniarski, Ellen; Perry, Tom; Roma, Paul; Smith, Robert; Daley, Patty; 'Dory Fox; 'Martha Twombly'; 'acanedy@comcast.net' Subject: RE: Austin Lot 26 facts--draft Hello all. . .I am resending this because Mr. Austin just called and said he did not receive an email, nor did his wife. Thanks, Tom -----Original message----- From: Broadrick, Tom Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 3 :11 PM To: 'john austin' ; 'cfroula@northwestern.edu' Cc: Weil, Ruth; Swiniarski, Ellen; Perry, Tom; Roma, Paul; Smith, Robert; Daley, Patty; Dorr Fox; 'Martha Twombly' ; 'acanedy@comcast.net' Subject: RE: Austin Lot 26 facts--draft Hello Mr. and Mrs. Austin, As you might have heard, I spoke directly with the Planning Board last evening at their regularly scheduled meeting. We discussed the Pond Village DCPC and what the Planning Board thought was allowed/prohibited during the limited moratorium imposed by the DCPC nominiation process. The Planning Board voted 6 in favor, 1 opposed on this motion by Planning Board Clerk Roy Fogelgren. . . 'move to endorse the intent of the Pond Village DCPC nomination to allow someone to move forward with a development project if they were in the process of obtaining a building permit as of June 6, 2005 and met the existing zoning requirements in effect at that time" . . .you clearly were 'in process ' and meet the zoning requirements, C---tlerefore-.your.building—permit_may.-Issue? I conferred with Tom Perry, Barnstable Building Commissioner, who said that if all of your paperwork including plans were filed in his office_by December 21st;2-(:05)that you could r expect-a permit„_to-issue,,by January 4th, 2006. You should verify that with him via his email noted above and/or Paul Roma, Building Inspector. In addition, because it is our local understanding that you may have a direct or indirect abutter who may be upset with the issuance of a building permit for your property, you should protect yourself by filing for a "hardship exemption" from the DCPC concurrently with obtaining your building permit. In the event that an appeal was upheld, you would already be in the system. Let me stress that any building permit may be appealed and yours is no exception, and I strongly suggest you file for the hardship exemption with the Cape Cod Commission just in case since you have an abutter who may/may not take action. Dorr Fox or Martha Twombly from the CCC can assist you in that endeavor. I hope you understand we must follow the process laid out for us. Should you have any further questions please use email to communicate with me as I am frequently away from my office phone. Thank you, Tom Broadrick Thomas A. Broadrick, AICP Director of Planning, Zoning & Historic Preservation Growth Management Department 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 1 508-862-4703 office 508-862-4983 fax tom.broadrick@town.barnstable.ma.us -----Original Message----- From: john austin [mailto:jbamusic@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, December 12; 2,005 2 :21 PM To: Broadrick, Tom; Swiniarski, Ellen Subject: FYI: Austin Lot 26 facts--draft Dear Mr. Broadrick, we have prepared the attached draft narrative of the facts about our exemption and permitting process. Since we refer to communications with you at several points, we wanted to make it available in case you see anything that requires correction. with thanks, John Austin and Christine Froula Do You Yahoo! ? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 2 I Message Page 1 of 1 Roma, Paul From: Broadrick, Tom Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:16 PM To: Perry, Tom; Roma, Paul Cc: Weil, Ruth; 'Dave Munsell' Subject: Austin Building Permit Tom and Paul, I just got a call from Martha Twombly at the CCC who said she could not issue a letter saying Austin can get a building permit. While the Planning Board was assuring people that 2 acre lots ought to be able to be built upon, I don't believe it was ever explicit in the DCPC Decision. Please let me run this by Ruth and Bob Smith and the Chair of the Planning Board before Mr. Austin comes in for the permit...please tell him I am working on it and will get back to him before the week is out at the latest. Tom B 12/1/2005 A-a S.r M 2801 Girard Avenue Evanston Il 60201 �r _ August 29, 2005 Dear Peter, Here are the plans as we've worked them out so far. We've been doing our best to simplify the construction and clarify the drawings, but they probably still need work. We look forward to your,questions and suggestions, about anything at all. A few notes on the structure: 1. House foundation takes a 3' jog east [into what appears from outside to be garage area] 2. Most of the garage perimeter wall is raised 5" above the house foundation wall, as indi- cated on drawings, with a pocket to make a 6" step-up from garage to house 3. Basement 2 W8-18 beams run E-W on foundation pocket + 2 steel posts 3 LVL beams run N-S on foundation walls, steel post, and wolmanized wood post 4. Roof load carried down from attic via LVL header beams and wood posts in lst and 2nd floors aligned over basement wood post Susan Regan, the architect who's been advising us, suggests we ask you about using 1/2" vs. 5.8" exterior sheathing. She says it depends on the quality of the material. She also suggested we ask you whether to set the plywood sheathing flush on the concrete perimeter wall--do you think that's best? We also wonder whether you need fuller insulation specs. We want the walls around the attic stairs to be well insulated, rigid insulation at headers on exterior walls--in short, a very well- insulated house. We would also like sound insulation around plumbing pipes in walls and ceil- ings. We're still working on the town water vs. well situation. We put in two calls to Bortolotti and faxed them John Ericson's plan but haven't heard anything from them yet. Please give us a call when you've had a chance to look things over--847 869.0133. All the best, SPECIFICATIONS AUSTIN RESIDENCE, LOT 26 SHEPERDS WAY BARNSTABLE MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The contract shall consist of the contractor's Bid or Proposal, the Drawings and the Specifications. 2. The Drawings and Specifications are intended to be complementary. Any items which are necessary for completion of the work and which are not specifically mentioned or drawn, but are implied in order to complete the work, shall be furnished as part of the work, except for stated exclusions. 3. All construction work shall comply with applicable statutes, ordinances and regulations of the Town of Barnstable and the State of Massachusetts. 4. Contractor shall verify all dimensions. Owner shall be notified of any omissions or dis- crepancies in the drawings or of any variations in dimensions or conditions on the site from those shown on the drawings before start of work. Changes in the work required by field con- ditions shall not be made without approval by owner. 5. Building permit shall be obtained by contractor. Contractor shall arrange for inspections as required by the Town of Barnstable. Approved plans shall be kept on site at time of inspec- tion. 6. Unless otherwise noted, contractor shall supply all materials, tools,. labor and other items necessary to complete the work. Workmanship and materials shall be of good quality and work shall be performed in accordance with accepted trade standards. 7. Contractor shall maintain the site in a safe, secure, debris-free and weathertight condition throughout the,construction period. Necessary precautions are to be taken in order to protect the building and landscaping during the construction period. Access to the property is to be managed in such a way as to protect the terrain from damage to the extent possible. 8. Contractor shall keep owner informed about scheduling of the work. Austin 2 EXCAVATION AND CONCRETE 1. All foundations shall bear on undisturbed soil with an allowable bearing capacity of 3000 psf. Contractor shall notify owner to order soil test if bearing capacity of soil is in question. All exterior footings and piers shall be located at least 3'-6' below final grade to protect against frost heave. 2. All concrete construction and detailing shall conform to ACI 318-89 and ACI 301-89. 3. Concrete shall be sand and normal weight coarse aggregate with a specified 28 day com- pressive strength of 3000 psi. All concrete reinforcing steel shall conform to ASTM A615, grade 60. (quantity--2) #4 top & bottom #4 at 18" o. c. vertical anchors at wall to footing (quantity-3) #4 continuous footing. See drawings for bulkhead, pocket ledge, and window placement. ***Provide step-up foundation wall where front-entry stoop meets basement wall at north foundation wall. 4. Provide TUFF NDRI water proofing and insulation system. 5. Contractor to prepare foundatio for, provide, and install Bilco or equal bulkhead and wolmanized steps and three Bilco Hopper or equal basement windows. Procedure notes 1. Do not place concrete on frozen or muddy material. 2. Concrete shall be protected from freezing and kept at 50 degrees for no fewer than 7 days after placement. 3. Dowel and key all footings; place rebar per notes above; coat all exterior tie-rod ends with mastic before waterproofing walls below grade. 4. Do not backfill until concrete is completely cured (14 days). 5. Backfill with clean free-draining inorganic material only, compacted; provide landscape filter fabric around 3/4"-1 1/2" crushed stone around perforated drain tile. �i r Austin 3 CARPENTRY 1. All structural wood work and rough carpentry shall use wood with moisture content not to exceed 19%. Wall, floor, and roof framing material shall be Hem Fir #2, fb=.1000, E=1.4, unless otherwise noted on drawings. TJI floor joists to be installed per manufacturer's . instructions. Manufactured laminated wood veneer products to have minimum values of fb=2,800 psi and E=2,000,000. Contractor to consult owner regarding any substitutions of species. All exposed lumber and any lumber in contact with basement/foundation concrete floor slab and walls to be pressure treated. Shore structural portions of construction as required. 2. Roof rafters shall be connected to the wall top plates and ridgeboard with a'SIMPSON H2.5 Seismic/Hurricane Tie at each rafter. Provide SIMPSON hold-down anchors at all posts at foundation. 3. Exterior corners shall be.2-stud corners with drywall clips for maximum actual R-value of insulation. 4. Provide solid bridging at midspan for all spans exceeding 8'0". 5. All subfloors to be 3/4" tongue and groove plywood, glued and screwed to the structure. 5. Cutting and notching of studs must comply with.CABO section 602.5 requirements. When the top plate is cut by 50% or more on a bearing or exterior wall, the plate shall be rein- forced with 24 gauge steel angle. 6. ***T J I's to be handled, installed, and drilled per manufacturer's specifica- tions/requirements. 7. Firestopping shall be provided in-concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred space, at ceiling and floor level & at all openings around vents, pipes, and ducts. 8. All interior window, door, base trim, and crown mouldings shall be poplar for paint. Contractor to have.all trim pre-primed before installation. Window and door casing to be 3 1/2" flat casing with a back band; all windows to get sill and apron. 5 1/4" base trim to get FAA r Austin 4 cap and shoe. Crown moulding in Living/Dining room to be large cove. Bedrooms to get small cove. 9. Kitchen and Bath cabinets and fixtures to be supplied by owner for installation by con- tractor. 10. Garage stair wall and ceiling to have 5/8" sheetrock, taped. 11. Closets to be supplied with wood shelves and hanging bars as shown on drawings. THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION 1. Contractor to supply and install fiberglass batt insulation with vapor barrier, of thick- nesses shown on drawings, under the first floor, between the garage ceiling and west wall and the house, in the house walls, under the attic floor, in the interior walls around the attic stairs, and under the attic stairs, with care to insulate snugly around all joists, passages, fixtures, vents, etc. Insulation under floors to be installed after radiant heat piping with care not to damage the piping. 2. New roof to be Certainteed 30XT shingles, with pitches as shown on drawings. Provide 3' ice and water shield at all eaves and valley. Flash roof at wall junctures and at roof pene- trations. Roof to have ridge vent and cap--see drawings for roof venting specifications. Roof deck to be DURADECK or equal walk-on roof membrane pitched to drain as shown on draw- ings. 3. Exterior finish to be quality resquared and rebutted white cedar shingles,.Grade B, 5 1/2" exposure, over TYVEK or TYPAR. Corner trim, gable end trim, and door and window opening casing/drip caps, porch deck guardrail to be AZEK or equal. 4. Gutters and downspouts to be aluminum with baked enamel finish, white. Austin 5 WINDOWS, DOORS AND HARDWARE[XX double ck sizes/quantities/model nos./ROsj LOEWEN White aluminum-clad windows and doors, Heat Smart System 1 Windows SDL 3/4" Double Hung.Profile 2 over 2 Door units SDL 2 across 3 down, as shown on drawings 4 Awnings as specified below 4 mull covers as shown on drawings Window Hardware Double Hung Sash Lock and Awning hardware, White Terrace Door units: TD/FD Meran handle, Black All windows to be provided with screens # on plans Door units 1. Door unit--Living/Dining Room FD2 1521 LAR 2 wide 3 high muntin pattern, with EQUALIZER French swing doors--white with black hardware R. O. 61 3/8" x 82" 2A. Door unit--Kitchen/Porch TD1 0720L 2 wide 3 high muntin pattern R. O. 31 3/4" x 80 3/8" 2B. Door Unit--West Bedroom TD1 0720L 2 wide 3 high muntin pattern with EQUALIZER full view traditional screen door white with black hardware R. O. 31 3/4" x 80 3/8" Windows 3. Quantity 4--Living Rm. DH2 2024 with 4" mull cover (4 sets of 2 ganged) R. O. 55 1.2" x 61" 4. Quantity 6--West Bedroom & Garage, South wall DH2 2024 with 4" mull cover R. O. 55 1/2" x 57" (6 sets of 2 ganged) 5. Quantity 2--West Bath & South Stair DH 12024 R. O. 26 3/16" x 57" 6. Quantity 1--Garage East DH2 2016 with 4" mull cover (set of 2 ganged) R. O. 55 12" x 41" 7. Quantity 2--East Bedroom DH3 2024 with 4" mull covers (set of 3 ganged) R. O. 84 7/8" x 57" 8. Quantity 8--North side, lst & 2nd floors, Kitchen west DHl 2016 R. O. 26 3/16" x 41" 9. Quantity 1--East Bedroom (northwest) Push Out Awning AW1 7412A cut to to match DH2O16, muntins (to resemble DH2O16) 2 over 2 with 2" Standard Profile horizontal bar, 3/4" DH Profile vertical bar R. O. 26 3/16" x 41" (check) 10. Quantity 1--Attic east Push Out AWl 7510A no muntins R. O. 30 5/16" x 40 3/16" 11. Quantity 2--Attic north & south Push Out AW 1 7412A no muntins R. O. 30 5/16" x 48 1/16" Austin 6 Doors Owner to supply front and garage.entry door mortise hardware and interior door hardware for contractor installation. Hinges and passage set boring size to be supplied by owner to con- tractor prior to door order placement, so that hinges can be pre-installed and doors can be pre- bored. Exterior Doors 1. Front entry door: 2-8 x 6-8 six panel for paint, WOODHARBOR or equal; weather guard on lower edge. Note solid trim panel above door on exterior. 2. Screen/storm door at front entry 3. Garage-to-house entry door: 3-0 x 6-8 six panel for paint, WOODHARBOR or equal, 20 min. fire rated; weatherguard on lower edge. 4. Basement bulkhead entry: Contractor to select and install basement bulkhead entry door with lock at bottom of steps [check Mass. code] Interior Doors: all doors six panel for paint unless noted otherwise 1. Basement stairs 3-0 x 6-8 First Floor 2. Half Bath 2-2 x 6-8 3. West Closet 2-4 x 6-8 4. East Closet 36" double louvered doors (2 18") Second floor Laundry/Bath 5. Entry 3-0 x 6-8 East Bedroom 6. Entry 2-8 x 6-8 7. Closet: 2-6 x 6-8 8. Attic stair 2-6 x 678 [insulate] West Bedroom 9. Entry 2-8 x 6-8 10-11. Closets 2-4 x 6-8 quantity 2 West Bath 12. Entry 2-8 x 6-8 13. Linen 2-0 x 6-8 Wood Garage Doors: Quantity 2, 8' x 7' Austin 7 FINISHES 1. New walls and ceilings to get 5/8" drywall. Finished walls and ceilings shall have a continuous, level and smooth appearance, with no evidence of patching or cracking. All baths to be lined with DUROCK and to get wood or white plastic matchstick wainscoting. Garage walls and ceiling to have insulation and 5/8" sheetrock, taped. 2. First and Second finish floors to be 2 1/4" maple or oak strip, longer lengths, for stain and two coats polyurethane, or 3/4" caramelized (dark) bamboo. Baths and powder room to get I" hexagon white ceramic tile laid on DUROCK or equal. Small (approx. 10' x 3'6") mudroom between garage and house to get linoleum (not vinyl) sheet flooring installed with "green" low-volatility adhesive. 3. Main stair to get maple or other hardwood or caramelized bamboo treads, risers, and top rail; newels and balusters for paint. Attic stair, top rail, and newels to be rough-carpentry, pine for paint. 4. Kitchen countertop to be 1 1/4" honed black absolute granite, eased edge. Backsplash to be wood.or white plastic matchboard. 5. Porch screen material to be charcoal grey fiberglass. 6. Exterior and interior painting shall consist of primer and two coats of Benjamin Moore or equal paint; ceilings and trim shall be one color throughout; one color for each room. 7. Kitchen and bath cabinet knobs and bath specialties to be supplied and installed by owner. PLUMBING/MECHANICAL/Utilities 1. Owner to arrange septic system, well or town water, and electrical and gas services. Contractor to install connections with heating/plumbing fixtures and electrical wiring. Owner to furnish construction road and finish road/driveway. 2. Owner to size and supply "Radiantec" open direct hot water radiant heat system with thermostats and clear, complete installation instructions. Contractor and plumber to install with owner present (bid as allowance). Contractor to vent Heat/HotWater tank through foun- dation wall. Contractor to see that due care is taken not to puncture or damage heat piping in floors during all subsequent work. Austin 8 3. Contractor to supply and install the following fixtures and faucets. Owners to select; bid fixtures and faucets as an allowance. First Floor Kitchen: single bowl undermount sink and faucet Basement: single-bowl freestanding utility sink and faucet Half bath: toilet, pedestal sink or drop-in basin, faucet Second Floor Laundry/Bath toilet, wall-mount basin, faucet, inset medicine cabinet 3'-0 x 3-0' fiberglass shower unit with tempered glass door; pressure balanced valve and head washing machine supply lines, water shut-off valves, and drain West Bath toilet, pedestal sink and faucets, inset medicine cabinet 3'0 x 5'0 fiberglass tub/shower; pressure balanced valve and head, and tub filler Exterior frostproof sillcock on north and south sides as shown on drawings 4. Plumber to provide plan and clear instructions for draining all pipes and fixtures. ELECTRICAL 1. House to have 200 amp service with whole-house surge protection at electrical box 2. All kitchen, bath, garage, attic, porch, porch roof, and exterior outlets to be.20 amp GFI. 3. Owner to supply light fixtures and fans for installation by contractor 4. Fan/Light switches to have separate controls I i ' I A�l r t� f t f , s , RAS 1 6C. Bum Road --�— •� 947,427.2914 prig ect Nara i ' Project Nurro��r .�_._.__.Y C�dc'� �y _ Dace Sher ^aehpraac8l•aioctic�-3tiurttsroS ,n n _.._�_--.------- _ &* I - UP BASEMENT STa��S t GA�tA�E Cn►i R ( L- oo rQ -r(4 L7ETl�I'L cf Jo.T TD SCALEI 1 X 9b, 53/4- (o" NPPROK. p , S.tLL p r '� �V s�.Av N�"I L - 2 N-s s�o �8 P ET a L DL- .. is i. i / S 77�oi'So"E 3Z2-.7/' i UcC� fi � W 38 —_ �� •; T, .��. `ice, ,77•.���`-�:7�� T _ PRo�oss�j;�D2/llELclRy:�� /� -If 3` / `� � !Y�� - .----' J~ •� TMp of!-rc../A.38.vo ' � - Lij Ce LU 3a p P�pas�v scnrr� _ 1 1 o ® � - I I �� ism FAR i Val 95 ,-f A L E VA T i v �.! CLaQ AL rl 1-74 ' 1 .moo ! � .. • v �1 My Q L A(fi c- t . A 5 �( C- L C �/.� T► n �1 _ �� 3- Off' � s ................. II i aN i i \fir .9 t - LION IH of ATT� CY 0 I ® t LI -------------------- a 1 Val S'r L E V,4 T o>N tt r ,. I . �• - +� � u L V�JO� .�..H.�-Td ilk.�-!. �`�. .. FZ L'-, ,. , �, ,,�--�2� �2. '�..��r� �s , ��c o;� (� • moo. p�-,�-r� ,�5 v.�, 12 77 '2 Poe .. y f . \`\ a ! � � I �i',� �, {h=1 D I�,J I D+✓�1..: G D�� �.�h� 1'` J,/�. I N' i - y i . ATT G cv `� f i i 15� ;F�R <toil z A complete Ti-Xpert framing plan requires the Trus Joist Framer's Pocket Guide See Trus Joist Framer's Pocket Guide for Product Trademark Information �TJ•X art® • 62, �� qWtf 14' 23' 8 1/2" 3' 3 1/2" 2' 'a 8' ~ 9' 0. 2' PREL�RV�RY DR.��17�G CREATED BY JOB COMMENTS A3 BBO Rml h Mid-Cape Home Centers PETER JOHNSON M2 PO BOX 1418 AUSTIN RES. 465 ROUTE 134 LOT 26 SHEPARDS WY — 2 SOUTH DENNIS, MA 02660 BARNSTABLE MA ~' II Rml 5083986071 A3 FAX: 5083984559 HMl 3- — —i. 3 j Hl j •`� ( M4 i I SYMBOL LEGEND — — I Ml 1 Point Load c 9P4 7 -�: :�: - — H2 3 i ! 16" Line Load ` i — g 7/g Area Load Ml __ A2 BBO Beam By Others c; H3- —i. — — x 3 Detail Callout Label (See Framer's Pocket Guide) a j M1 i Required Bearing Length in inches Joists By Other co a� ! (Adequate bearing has been provided if � .— — _ — •i y bearing length is not indicated.) N -1 3 r I j I i BBO II 1 i I Joists By Others; LEVEL NOTES Rml ! i File Name: JOHNSON AUSTIN 9.23.JOB 6 /4" A3 Level Name: SECOND FLOOR Plotted: 9/23/2005 15:20 Design Status: A3 FIRST FLOOR....9/23/2005 14:50 aF+ ao SECOND FLOOR...9/23/2005 14:50 A3 ATTIC LOADS....9/23/2005 14:50 ROOF LOADS.....9/23/2005 14:50 NOTE: Level design times indicated above provide o assurance for proper level stacking. Design Methodology: ASD ` Floor Area Loads Vary: 40 to 65psf Live Load and 12 to 15psf Dead Load Maximum Joist Deflection: L/480 Live Load 14' - -- ---24' ► 3' -► 21 L/240 Total Load TJ-Pro Rating Information: Weighted Average: 40 ACCESSORIES LIST Lowest Rating: 34 Highest Rating: 50 Plot ID Length Product Plies Qty Glued & Nailed Decking is Required Direct Applied Ceiling of 1/2" Gypsum is Required JOIST AND BEAM LIST Rml 16' 1 1/4" x 14" 1.3E TimberStrand LSL 1 11 1 X 4 Strapping is Required Shl 4' x 8' 23/32" Panels (24" Span Rating) 1 37 Floor Decking: 23/32" Panels (24" Span Rating) Plot ID Length Product Plies Qty Rm, Rim Board Normal O.C. Spacing = 16"* Al 24, 14" TJI 360 joist 1 20 *Unless noted otherwise A2 61 14" TJI 360 joist 1 15 HANGER LIST - Simpson Strong-Tie Tie Company, Inc.® Layout Scale. 3/16 = 1 A3 6' 14" TJI 360 joist 1 3 P g- p Y. ■■ ■ M1 14, 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 1.9E Microllam LVL 3 12 M2 18, 1 3/4" x 11 7/8" 1.9E Microllam LVL 2 2 Plot ID Qty Product Label Top Nails Face Nails Member Nails Notes M3 20' 1 3/4" x 14" 1.9E Microllam LVL 2 2 M4 4' 1 3/4" x 14" 1.9E Microllam LVL 1 H1 17 ITT3514 4-N10 2-N10 2-N10 Page 2 of 4 2 H2 2 ITT14 4-N10 2-N10 2-N10 9 H3 4 F.GUS5.50/10 46-16d 16-16d Hanger Notes: FOR THE TJ-XPERT WARRANTY SEE FRAMER'S POCKET GUIDE TJ-Xpert 6.40(#691)C6.40 D6.40 S6.40 P6.40 A complete TJ-Xpert framing plan requires the Trus Joist Framer's Pocket Guide See Trus Joist Framer's Pocket Guide for Product Trademark information TJ�X/ t ' , ROL . f^yaa PREL���N,�RY DR;�II�fNG 4 24' 24' CREATED BY JOB COMMENTS Mid-Cape Home Centers PETER JOHNSON Rml (52) PO BOX 1418 AUSTIN RES. 465 ROUTE 134 LOT 26 SHEPARDS WY SOUTH DENNIS, MA 02660 gARNSTABLE MA 4 9/16n Ili I I 5083986071 i FAX: 5083984559 0 i SYMBOL LEGEND P°BBO ( 19)JI Point Load I i H�1 BBO ( Line Load 21) Area Load N I BBO Beam i By Others I00 I I Detail Callout Label yr o l I i (See Framer's Pocket Guide) N A M I I Required Bearing Length in inches c , I (Adequate bearing has been provided if I bearinglength ,x e is not indicated.3 th ) BBO 17 I Joists By Others I I LEVEL NOTES M3 ( 28) i File Name: JOHNSON AUSTIN 9.23.JOB — +. _ Level Name: ATTIC LOADS 2 Plotted: 9 23 2005 15:22 Design Status: FIRST FLOOR....9/23/2005 14:50 A3 SECOND FLOOR...9/23/2005 14:50 O ATTIC LOADS....9/23/2005 14:50 co ROOF LOADS.....9/23/2005 14:50 A3 NOTE: Level design times indicated above provide assurance for proper level stacking. N Design Methodology: ASD 1 (53)=r' Floor Area Loads Vary: 30 to 40psf Live Load and 12 to 12psf Dead Load Maximum Joist Deflection: L/480 Live Load L/240 Total Load 24' Nott. do ill 6" 8' 4' 6" — TJ-Pro Rating Information: Weighted Average: 32 Lowest Rating: 31 JOIST AND BEAM LIST Highest Rating: 32Glued & Nailed Decking is Required Plot ID Length Product Plies Qty Direct Applied Ceiling of 1/2" Gypsum is Required 1 X 4 Strapping is Required Al 24' 11 7/8" TJI 360 joist 1 27 Floor Decking: 23/32" Panels (24" Span Rating) M1 10' 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 1.9E Microllam LVL 2 2 Normal O.C. Spacing = 120* M2 SO' 1 3/4" x 11 7/8" 1.9E Microllam LVL 2 2 *Unless noted otherwise Layout Scale: 3/16" = 1' HANGER LIST - Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.® ACCESSORIES LIST Plot ID Qty Product Label Top Nails Face Nails Member Nails Notes Plot ID Length Product Plies Qty H1 9 ITT3511.88 4-N10 2-N10 2-N10 Page 3 of 4 H2 1 Not Found Rml 16' 1 1/4" x 11 7/8" 1.3E TimberStrand LSL 1 ' 6 a 9 Sh1 4' x 8' 23/32" Panels (24" Span Rating) 1 23 Hanger Notes: Rm, Rim Board FOR THE TJ-XPERT WARRANTY SEE FRAMER'S POCKET GUIDE TJ-Xpert 6.40(#691)C6.40 D6.40 S6.40 P6.40 • A complete TJ-Xpert framing plan requires the Trus Joist Framer's Pocket Guide See Trus Joist Framer's Pocket Guide for Product Trademark information ®�TJIX P,e r t® 1 _ 1 1 ' ��ffi p r MMVT141ING 14' 23' 8 1/2" 3' 3 1/2" CREATED BY LEVEL COMMENTS JOB COMMENTS Mid-Cape Home Centers PLANS NOT DATED CS PO BOX 1418 PETER JOHNSON 465 ROUTE 134 AUSTIN RES. SOUTH DENNIS, MA 02660 LOT 26 SHEPARDS WY 5083986071 BARNSTABLE MA i FAX: 5083984559 r Joists By Others SYMBOL LEGEND Point Load 41 -, '^ " ( HBO ( 26) — Line Load CD _ Area Load P° P9 i I 9 5/16" N s BBO Beam By Others m oo N cn _ O Detail Callout Label (See Framer's Pocket Guide) 880 ( 25) j Required Bearing Length in inches I T (Adequate bearing has been provided if Joists By Others I j I I �! bearing length is not indicated.) i I I i cs I I LEVEL NOTES 6 7/8" File Name: JOHNSON AUSTIN 9.23.JOB Joists By Others I j Level Name: FIRST FLOOR I I I Plotted: 9/23/2005 14:55 I j Design Status: I FIRST FLOOR....9/23/2005 14:50 SECOND FLOOR...9/23/2005 14:50 ATTIC LOADS....9/23/2005 14:50 ROOF LOADS.....9/23/2005 14:50 i I NOTE: Level design times indicated above provide assurance for proper level stacking. Design Methodology: ASD Floor Area Loads Vary: 40 to 65psf Live Load and 12 to 15psf Dead Load 14' 23' 8 1/2" 3' 3 1/2" Maximum Joist Deflection: L/480 Live Load L/240 Total Load TJ-Pro Rating Information: Weighted Average: NA JOIST AND BEAM LIST Lowest Rating: NA Highest Rating: NA Plot ID Length Product Plies Qty Glued & Nailed Decking is Required Direct Applied Ceiling of 1/2" Gypsum is Required M1 20' 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 1.9E Microllam LVL 2 2 1 X 4 Strapping is Required Floor Decking: 23/32" Panels (24" Span Rating) Layout Scale: 3/160' = 1' Page 1 of 2 FOR THE TJ-XPERT WARRANTY SEE FRAMER'S POCKET GUIDE TJ•Xpert 6.40(#691)C6.40 D6.40 S6.40 P6.40 -,. � ; w }kx" t �. tee....:. .'. .. a ar 01 14 i I ®G' Uc21: U l f t i TY , Lz:)c c G ACC>r SS Cn1-ICRiE i t PIEi2S vrr�. IStAT �. rl t k r / (- jYauz r Ham/ �' r. /� r� !� SM®R DETECT® .'' 1 RS REVIEWED BARNSTA13LE S UILDING DEPT. �- i j \ i EAT. E �. .. FIRE DEPARTMEN BOTH SIGNATURES ARE REQUIRED T DATE cn 2 / I ? o w 4JrJ h I I FOR PERMITTING , f ' ors S-Tah1D 0Fp- i P�STeASr_- I eF F.9Si tkvo Ir 0 ) _ .I. I 1 0 3-o x x .` IPOCKFT z I C rk � Er . - of r G �;'� �I..��t• r CEA opt 3 >:.. I ac tP1GT: � It A. CL/ � - PL 3! Fo.oTrnrc�S.• x3=o`rx 1' lr f' 1 /// 1.%� / ! �a F. FF ; ��s�M��I FouND/�T10N �tTA V O W = TLO P f�D F C)P. 6+ LC (o5n No?P tvS - 3z" - �i`�?At=:.� br`'EtJIN�S 6�E2 [Ki 6(Z' S rtIS1(�'t1C'.Tra �l S � � I L l r E2, _ J NINIMl1M CaNCyTE � } i48Est1E QvL►cHE� OPE BEA N�Nro I I t Lou G. AT 130 'OH I ` f , -44 I 14 i I� '• ' is id i{ �� �.t � I i ` f � . ' I d t i ; y J ; � I. I _ i s I i ! ! i 1 +' }, 1� II IIlt{ pil ! f ( i # { V4(DI�►�/ /rs'rs tot-�C-R6TF SLNQ) , 17 t j J jj I _ 9 EEE �p 2 mm too - us. a `� � I � i f� �1 ';•I X tps l a'p o + I t I} ?� i ! �t� � � i � � �� ! 3+ �� !I 3�4`I /•�,P.(a..PLyW�9, F s- �� � �� �y� I p � I }� I ;i , `i C .; I i i � ; f t i p !� � + � �, I I -----------•-'----------------_,--- _--_.---'__.— jf ! } - -- - �.._ y._j i_� t-re l3CAM L od PiZ f R-J G 5 E E N?/ 'Fo A-r 1 o 'L A 3 5 X 4 ` LONG AT gQ cf o. - . r ; :J • J H�E ND ZC �i°�Y uT!_-i �--Fir✓ I — - - ,s'� `� �, {-•��s3a o�� ;� ` ' 4.. G�� X.. (� S r 1 ' _ : 'S't i T t -z, Zr r 2 D£IZ Z rc l.Z - — — -- s i lF aE c _ .. - I 1 11 E ( t' LU A.P.'A. PLYNA 4PP i N T4 / SHGR-ra+ a _l (! s/gas TJ1 (oD SIT Z-134x It�A LVL, -1 EADtR o N' , 2 -2.x aZ HG'kbeR �:.—Z x la N6AP�it —.__ "Z- Zx,(z HEADEP, r� ri I IJ Co Z N D � D _ m Z � ° � Z rn I f i `. AdI F - 70 N 6. rJ i 7 x 40, ly 1 _ } - `1I l -{f nr. N ff .TI — vl .� _ , r 6> i , 4 s YM a I TID � C>6 1 _ — w IN • t ,Q - it avlva V 1 e 1 • , � � Its/, , .. _ . ( 1+' � S . .y. Vt ..:. :.. .:.....:. r �. 2Jq" It\P5ULATC � a c CLOS. T f L-ADS E i • - LA L� i. U aQAs C1L-nSET L)YL 77 6-3 �j, ,O, F1 .. . . ... .. .....::..:.. y L Gal Is I It J C l_�of �o t . s 1 0\ vo � ' l •Il O��CIO �c� (; \ o P \ �I E � a � P r. ,o VN Iqfir' rN CO o ._ q, o. . _no G �.v / 1 11 I ; r r E 7�� l► i i 1 � 1 ', 1 �>'� ��11� � -� _\ �_ � �.�:-. .. _.:._..[bra � f C (ri ed H - � o � 6 I i i - ' -- - . ............ 777 I-- ITI ---------------- I C _..,._...�w ..........LOVl .� v yf m cl fl EDW 2B 4. so r o . --- I 3 - h' t l 91 i .. .. ... • j I --------- --- 3 - ril � 1'lld S l» P. ;.: II I 'I-:•..!! �: III• ,, , ? r 14 TSB Z rf, ZL41 OPECL a'D�F f r tm.t i o a ADOF { ac f Y IIn o 0 0 0 11II f ATE,,pp ✓ ;,: 61Q-/�. .: D.� /71\ B�� r j _____._ - r ii It Y - - - -- - I � i • 4 i ! I i � I ! i � I I ;! _ i � i , I r i C CLtJ c/2 �J ST �r S is I r4 LIDO .IOU y - � a I, i 1 f �f 4 230 @ 12,E ol .c _._....�_.. �_._.. .__ C I 0 o Iv IJ G v✓ S i SEG r�fV �� i fj !I. fill Ll 11 - 17 s !� it L l /_ f l I I FLTL I _ _ . -- j � x I 1 N 6 M3 C-Ci.S u PV O.6(L 0 1 I r , I(o" O,C. l� f , Ill - S SECTf ON L60k( IG E-Ar t .00 'KeLPA1) 'QED To oA) Ti AIM A) Vey a !` ql � j F'RtiS oo F �LCC.TR;I.c. S ILL CO GK &130V w LTIU EAT- APPARATUS[ WCtt {-FEAT ELECTY21� � ��K {+v✓ t°ANEL 2oO AMP Q FLaotZ S u jzet p2 A�ry C'FtCT'ECT�orl SD LA rZ1300 { O.O Mot wx�o� ' I 3w� y ALL BASEME�,1T bcJTL�TS GrF 3o" ABoVE FL ,2 i . CPC Bt/C SUPPLY AND WASTE PIPE TO p`nI c .F , 4 _ J� FAl/1. - --Tt L ' t AN ti t N t ALL AF/L '0U7LE i� t - I i Am C F p PLP �B 9B L o N G-7` CA�. •�B_u r�a a �v ,. �L� L G _ _ Multiple Member Beams Multiple Member Beams Joist hanger _LEGEND Side Loaded connection REVISIONS: BY: Side Loaded Connection 1 3/4"Versa-Lam AJS' Blocking Panel. Toe nail rim board to plate with 2'/z"(Sd)nails at Use 3" tOd nails at 6"o.c. i7imboard and AJS'"side-by-side. Nail Pattern ( ) 6"o.c.or with 3/,"(16d)nails at 12"o.c. Bearing Weill Below 1/2"dla. Bolt(b) � Nail rim board and rim joist with Max Uniform Load (lbs.perlin.ft) 16d common nails. 2'/z'(8d)nails at 6"o.c. 12"o.c. Number of - — Max.Uniform Load 24"o.c. 12"o.c. 6"o.c. See chart Nail each end (Ibe.perin.ft.) Bearing Wall Above 13/4"Versa-Lam _ Lam— with 1 -3" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Numberof grows 3rows (10d)nail L — — — — — — — — — — — , Bolt Spacing 1/2°did. 2 500 1000 2000 ! Members l Load Bearing Bolt(b) 3 375 750 1500 2"min. 2 520 780 Walls a Non-Bearin Wall Below - - g 4(a) 330 670 1330 C 3(a)! 390 585 , 2"min. — -_-- Non-Bearing Wall Above (a)7"w ide members must be loaded from both sides. g (b)Design values apply to common bolts(grade 5 or higher) (a) Nail pattern for 3-piece member must occur on both sides. Use flat w ashers each side and drill holes 1/2"dia. Solid block all posts from Staggered (c)Allvalues in the table above may be increased 15%for snow loaded roofs ai 1�/z" minimum end bearing length above to bearing below. 25%for non-snow roofs w here code allow s. Nail values may be increased by 15%for snow-load at all floor and roof details. 1-2'/"(8d)nal for roofs and by 25%for non-snow roofs where each joist flange Versa-Lam Post Below Post Above building code allows. LVL beam Multiple Member Connection Bolt \ Multiple Member Connection Nail F13-D' Attachment at End 'eking Panels at Interior Bearing Post Load Transfer ' �� Rim Board _ LVL Header Opening Exterior End Wall Su ort F49 F N.T.S. F13-E, 7FO�� F14-A,N.T.S. N.T.S. �� N.T.S. N.T.S. A N.T.S. F19 N.T.S. F13-C� N.T.S. Post Above& Below W 1-- z0 W W p 2 LLL J Lu W ry W i— 5 Lu OU) > W z Q W = W m ~ 3 gpz 1 � 2 2) Attic I i I I I I -1 Framing Schedule - Nominalized -J Tag Qty Description Length ( � H3_j 2 1-3/4' x 1 I-//8 VtKbA-L./-kiuM�, 3'i00-t:., i I I Notes: ••— -- - I �- op drawings, typical details Bearing wall. t 1 — t installation procedures and unit Identification marks, shall be I 1 t i submitted for approval by the 3 — ———— —— — — —— project architect and/or engineer. i 1 t Exact quantities and lengths are the responsibility of the contractor. 1 3 Attic Contractor is to Verify all beams 1 ® Accessory Schedule and joists at their exact locations. f The floor system (1 joist, LVL)are Tag Qty Manufacturer Product. Description designed for floor loads only. t Roof loads from rafters, bracing, H3 7 Simpson Strong-Tie Inc. IUT412-> 3-1/2 x 11-1/4 to 16 Face Mount" and beams must bear on exterior I 1 I walls and Interior walls with bearing straight through to a footing. Any I 1 t roof loads carried by the floor system must be so Indicated on the framing I l i plan submitted to us for take-off. Product to be stored, handled and 1 i installed in accordance with I1 I manufacturers recommendations. START FRAMING HERE 3 Level 3 Al 11-7/8" BC 190s-2.0 S P 16" OGS =_ Attic 1 /4 11111 = 1 1.011 _ 4- = U N O � O U � - Q Co M � � dC a E a� CU W = BC FRAMER® 6 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DATE: 6/13/2006 BY: be FILE: Johnson Austin.bcf DWG: SHEET: 2 / 2 ist Saved Date: 6/16/2006 10:09 AM int Date: 6/16/2006 10:15 AM Multiple Member Beams Multiple Member Beams Joist hanger REVISIONS: BY: LEGEND Side Loaded Connection Side Loaded Connection AJS' Blocking panel. - 1 3/4"Versa-Lam Toe nail rim board to plate wdh 2/"(8d)nails at — 1/2"dia. Bolt(b) Nail Pattern Use 3"(10d)nails at 6"o.c. 6"o.c.or with 3'/"(16d)nails at 12"o.c. Rim board and AJS "fide-by-side. .Bearing Wall Below Nail rim board and rimjoist with Max.Uniform Load 2'/"(8d)nails at 6"o.c. (lbs,per lin.tt.)_ 16d common nails. I - 1, :A� Number of �12"e'c'— / Max Uniform Load 24"o.c. 12"o.c. 6"o.c. See chart Members � Nail each end (Ibs.per In.ft.) Bearing Wall Above 13/4"Versa-Lam --Nu with 1 -3" m ber of 2 rows 3 rows (10d)nail 500 1000 2000 Members Load Bearing Bolt Spacin 12"dia. Bolt(b) 2"min. 2 520 780 WaNs � 3 375 750 1500 ,Non-Bearing Wall Below 4(a) 330 670 1330 3(a) 390 585 2"min. Non-BearingWall Above (a)7"w ide members must be loaded from both sides. (b)Design values apply to common bolts(grade 5 or higher) (a) Nail pattern for 3-piece member must occur on both sides. Is flat w ashers each side and drill holes 1/2"dia. 1'/V minimum end bearing length Solid block all posts from Staggered-tom--� (c)All values in the table above may be increased 15%for snow loaded roots ai g g above to bearing below. — ' 25%for non-snow roofs w here code allow s. Nail values may be increased by 15%for snow-load at all floor and roof details. 1-2'/"(8d)nail for roofs and by 25%for non-snow roofs where each joist flange Versa-Lam ,Post BBIOW Post Above building code allows. LVL beam Attachment at End �� Exterior End Wall Support ® Multi le Member Connection Bolt F49 Multi le Member Connection Nail / king Panels at Interior Bearing Post Load Transfer Rim Board LVL Header Openin�c ' . ��� P F13-D� N.T.S. IF13-E� F08 F14- F19 F13-C �� N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. � � N.T.S. Post Above & Below U) I- zp wwp 2 L WDwLU u- 0U) > w Z w M � 0z J I- J Q 10 10 --- -1- ----- ------ ---- - -- - _--_5(2)-=-_ 1 I I I I I ( ) 4 2 3 3 I I _1 G. ' 2nd Floor Accessory Schedule H 1L 4(2) _ _ _ _ 1 I 1 f e. 9(2) Tag Qty Manufacturer Product Description I II D3 10 H1 2 Simpson Strong-Tie Inc. IUT314 2-9/16 x 14 to 20 Face Mount* motes: 10 Bearing Walls. ...... I I H2 6 Simpson Strong-Tie Inc. IUT3512 2-5/16 x 11-7/8 to 16 Face Mount' Shop drawings, typical details ( __ _ _ ___=—�1 _ ____ ____ _ _ __ __ i and framing plans, outlining 4 2) I I 1 I I IT Y I installation procedures and unit identification I ' arks, shall be 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 21 submitted for a project architect and/or engineer. i I I I i Exact quantities and lengths are 4(2) ___.._.. _. _...___ I the responsibility of the contractor. 10' 1 1 I 2nd Floor Contractor is to verify all beams i and joists at their exact locations. I 1 Framing Schedule - Nomiinalized 1 612) I The floor system (1-joist, LVL) are 1 I I ' Tag Qty Description Length designed for floor loads only. I I I Roof loads from rafters, bracing, l I I I 14" BCl®60s 2.0 SP 24' 0" and beams must bear on exterior H2 I I I walls and interior walls with bearing -------------------- ---- ---- ---- ---------- 2 17 14"AJSTM 20 PMSR 20' 0" straight through to a footing. Any I - 3 2 14"AJSTm 20 PMSR 8' 0" roof loads carried by the floor system 10 --- --- — See 2nd fl framing plan, must be so indicated on the framing START FRAMING HERE 1i2'' VERSri-i_t-ilViU J i 16' 0' plan submitted to us for take-off. this area 2x4 framing. product to be stored, handled and 1 _ II10 Level 2 A2 1-3/4" x 11-7/83" VERSA-LAM®3100 T & Installed In accordance with I _.. 14" AJS 20 MSR 16" OCS , manufacturer s recommendations. . , - 83"VERSA-LAM® 3100 :;•: ^" L2 1-3/4" x 11-7/83"VERSA-LAM® 3100 SL 0„ 1 _ i 8 1 1-3/4" x 14"VERSA-LAM@ 3100 SP 14' 0„ I I z START FRAMING HERE _-- _ _� 9 2 1 3/4" x 14" VERSA LAMO 3100 SP 6' 0" Level 2 Al 10------ 14" BCl 60s-2.0 SP 12" OCS =_ 2nd F = 1 '-�" 1 /411 U � 0 N O L � U a O -Q con 0 p N �, a � � 04 Q C N f0 W = BC FRAMER® 6 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DATE: 6/13/2006 BY: be FILE: Johnson Austin.bcf DWG: SHEET: 1 / 2 Ist Saved Date: 6/16/2006 9:59 AM int Date: 6/16/2006 10:09 AM _.._.--------- ---------------Or 1 1 • ArT c. i � Q 1 LTIE1 . 11111 A I - L 2 ; 0 N 2 u. rE(�H, J oo"I- 01 , rolnlr, 1 1 C1120 �. E VA T i o r.l 1 1-114(- 1f � � %Ik- D \ I� 1 4.S 12 a , E I El FF El LLI oz El J _ 0 ry�1 g U - ^t y:1cECttyt���tt 41 1 was! .E.. . ._ JUL 2 0 tuOo TC���N QF SAFiNSTASLC 1 I4lSTOI�!C PRE VAlQ—N_ ' 12 A, 5 i a I � •- o- m a 40 TO ILI N } �.� rya { \n S-r F 6otZ fG RA-DE $e`fo,,j I � � 1 i 5 a u-rH Et vN ti 0. TDA/i, OF P";INSTABLE HISTORIC -RESERVATION pp 4Q D P. E r J-- I \ = I ; (I ` �'f"f t G � I f FFI III- t � N O so N N .N 0 fill I I o ZN�FI_ 1 _ ... ----------- ^tom t:it:q W1-0a2831 AP1' avne „ 2,n� _ M. 1 G _ i ff1L y � t ' 1 a i t � 40 7 Fl I El I Lm-j L.L-- L. I I L i t r 1 1 srFLoo 5 d u.--fH po 3 0 F y 4-Tr n w , • Q .,. : IZ- r b N d -W .� , p p S � . 1 �. 6 y y a - -..' '-►-•,. 1 ... '.. - ,. .. . > ---•-..•... ;..: - ^'fir.: :: . t s r . 1 - c -� _.._ .,_... .rib A4,Er , f6CEAIP ' t . t • 4 rt. hi 5 �✓ a wAl , f ,.. �._ ,� ,I. _ 3 .. /� v - /� l, t , .,.,t ..-....... Y/G.� /1/Q7"� r�u. s Ttv/3� oet�s Mn s , �r G i :• . Txl1c ?_ _y rt Y 'u lop , z L t't HlLCCG O/3 0 0 3 , .S1R , r y bq ♦ t2.83 is ! IMA 1 . ..••�'' `'\ ... .Tor of FOUNonnory - r V h R f Its CR-6 COVE. .... _ 3 y •.:` r t ► . . ORSG»EE WIN. ♦ r PV LEACHING TR£11G» / REO. �`'`v� •• ♦\ O I I'� r y „ PERYT rYL PIPE Y1N. so 1. ONLY/ >Z YLN.' ) ♦ ... .� ,,.>r...y...t .l ♦ . PIPE-MIN. 1/e - WASHED :: PITCH W'PER.r'I t/Z'• t� STONE ♦ ;Lr..:.., ;.;. .. ti4S ttl�itl E-•� 2� 4,t�' r . •4. g 4 TL37" �4+. . . .trw.r, ;.. 74..T9� MfVERT NVT '%C C5+C1'Q,"C7 15 L7' 24 A �� 5 r _.• d SEPTIC TANK 3G-��F d o d., _-. _ . .t.�. � t�oLC` + , S �r� •• t5...__ to��Y .c7.A•C;d:�:"C�-btO�p• 1 �•--- rEsr '♦ .•• 34.44 ............_G►t_ Wv" GIST tNYEs'r / 33 � � cE�tc�l r�2�,crc�r ., �...._.. �..�er Precast sOOGnt.t�oct, s�.--1vz' NoLE 3!{ ♦� - 1 X pt 3)n to.. •`. BOX ( m. � � # 6'CR1JSNfD STONE Chamber' r►51'ED 579ME 0VE,7L4,6 � 1 d • r PROM LE OF " 3z � `�-•----� ...•:/. P-9889 Goa, o --_-A TAaLt SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM fMCAL CROZ SECTION SOIL LOG r RE,VCH . ---- / 7 /o'00 NO S_A LEACHING T GATc NOVt�Za�av nu=_.........�� NO SC•..= 1 TES s N0'-!¢ +C4, .79 -So DESIGN DATA: _-r-,..�,.,�.- 1/7.' 9- N.N W:StED '36 ►AX. S/1-No to HUY�R CrBE:ptoCf;S Y � /oy2 _ r tI Q Lr SDN� !L. ' � EG;3G,49 C-Z.33.n 8 TOTAL Esnu rr`V_0 1<•Lov. . 3......G LLOHS/DAr .. e.Cz-KOA 3S,g3 Op t 32. CL-.�/.67s/a./o}tio 2 4/ 4/0.SL Y ` na-:U►+ t=ac iiNG AZEn so.Fr/TLNU+ tj; y 24. " • S. o ZD �� 2" GZ.3o g3 SrGT / ��L a Y1 4 - SIDE LFrCYtNG AREA ._.11c..._.' 3t]F ./Tttr?tCN �: t�.iSr b•:• • "'�.� \ � rr G 'Eo o y �3 a.j3r.So _ c- p jl- 3 MffA.SXgy4' GARLAGE DISPOSAL N17/�Fa..(5O% AREA INCREASE) 63 �—\ /o�12 ` �.AL LIacrtfNL :..REa y/ y OVG'�• 2z $6T1aH OF AIJD -4 PM%=LA710N RATZ ;3 'PER.-/A/. ..t, ... 'P_ INCH 5r- C ; N �¢ LJ1i1NC AREA PER P�igL-A`IOH V W17W 17M� /d _ l� CL /r.� APPROVED .. ! _- � _-•tom \ /5G aoaP0 OF }tJ1L'H Z G ---- 1 1 ./♦ „/. '�^ �,. y" - .......WAT_R cNCOUNZD ... _ \ YVITVESSED BY . BOARD OP _ LoT u / 'v�r .�TL T"r O/�/ /Z. �/Yi!► ENG EE O .Tf/EF. . . . (H QF Ii1 p X �,�•`,,.�'�"�.r.•--_ �,.._ --- , �-d � -�`J-/ L=Di�c%tfZfl L%t .C3ATLNSTA 1'1 �F� , r -`� \ / \ .C� 1 P1;tom •... STEIZ) 3REDS4*� Q -..--- /"'' �-`"� /✓'� �,.� �� �a o t �� `rd'/ Pip EVAI_ ED A KELLEY rn' No.26100 A ,� �� �, fclsT z �R - / i \ ,�/ LL SOIL LOG DATE.9!�4i30 - TIME .T&t- 7-9ZovS -5Ct9C� f�S /UOT�� M TES G y \ THOLE. ,... TEST HOLE_..... �Vi6EL' , DEC. 30,2005 \ EL EV. AZ:oa. ELEV.... . � ....-....... Ey ( \ � 8 l2L c: Preo F; h�iw.D .Sure vc-y�.e /U sKT s C cL i Gt� M Q :572,1 \' c Z S/L r� , • to a 2 � / E zl.00 ! .. El,2/.40 3 . . .,. WATERENCOUNTERED � G GCG'END •_..,- `-.. -- •..-" _ G `. WITNESSED BY. /AlC' , / ....,.:....,, BOARD OF HEALTH /a 5'/ ! .. +moo t134 Z sots ... A� 0 . r aSED_C29DF 1 _. .. ..... U.E / �pz 5100 : \ �' !/ ISI e rNA L ® , i , i f i � .- WA �. S 7700/'Sa/'E ..3ZZ: I 4_ O 40Cti5 HAP SCR[F / : /vo e� -� / /' 9S' ' ' !�/ poSCE 5 ,� sS �eS �►P Zs 3.4 000 \ / r ZIT - ' Per,-/ �r Q 9 y. $ '. f2AT 2 Z �- 27` i� / 2,4 1 c y z 91 zoos c I /� �,, ,• '' , verA , 3C� owAa � 2z 407 �z4 L.4,vz> '��.. r /'�L, n/ 2oS.SaF fi KELL-Y (0. 26100 ,