The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0800 BEARSE'S WAY (3) goO �ds f LF r 0 0 N 0 v I 1 £I r� rZ, � c c � � l J�• Hyannis Fire Department B a epFo 95 High School Road Extension Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 1896 Phone:(508) 775-1300 Facsimile:(508) 778-6448 l To Report an Emergency Dial 911 or 775 23 3 Property Inspection Report Form Business Name: Phone : Street Address : Sprinkler System :Yes No PSI / Can System be Pumped When Shut Down? Yes No FDC Location : Side Near: Shut Off Location : Closest Fire Hydrant Location : Fire Alarm System :Yes No Monitored by Hyannis Fire : Annunciator Location : Side Near: Main Panel Location : Suppression System(s) Yes No Last Inspection Key Box:Yes No Location :Side Near : (##=Violation, '•=Notes, O= Uncorrected, corrected) Reinspection Date: +` c Fire Dept. Inspector: I�i � �:c. rt try. Date : l6 62 Occupant: Phone: EMERGENCY CONTACT NUMBERS Phone: 2. Phone: 3. Phone: White: Fire Dept. Canary: Reinspect Pink:Property r �, "N• Hyannis Fire Department �$t B a eNeo 95 High School Road Extension Hyannis, Massachusetts 02601 1896 Phone: (508) 775-1300 Facsimile:(508) 778-6448 F To Report on Emergency Dial 911 or 775-2323 1 Property Inspection Report Form Business Name: PAPit 3 df .K Phone : Street Address : Sprinkler System :Yes No PSI / Can System be Pumped When Shut Down? Yes No FDC Location : Side Near: Shut Off Location Closest Fire Hydrant Location Fire Alarm System :Yes No Monitored by Hyannis Fire : Annunciator Location :Side Hear: Main Panel Location : Suppression System(s) Yes No Last Inspection : Key Box:Yes No Location :Side Near: (##=Violation, "= Notes,O= Uncorrected,4=corrected) Reinspection Date: I I ,I ./A C, t o It t5-C, ItTs J4 �0 F I A F ONiTS Fire Dept. Inspector: l� �� N$�6L Date : (C Z� Occupant: Phone: EMERGENCY CONTACT NUMBERS 1. Phone: 2. Phone: 3. Phone : '� White: Fire Dept. Canary: Reinspect Pink:Property r {{F l STRUCTURAL INSPECTION REPORT # 2 GIN RING COMPANY,INC. 2W cranberry Highway To: Barnstable Building Department Route 6A Orleans,MA 02653 A) a Project: Cape Crossroads Condos Job No: C15616.01 Q o PHONE 50&255.651i (Ifo a ion 800 Bearses Way, Hyannis Date/Time: 6-19-02/1:00pm TP 508.487.9600 REPRESENTATION . Provincetown Contractor: Rick Clark,J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc FAx SoS—SYv-9� �.2 508.778.9600 Hyannis FAX Architect: Rick Fenuccio,Brown,Lindquist, Fenuccio&Richmond,Inc. 508.255.6700 Ems' A construction inspection was conducted at the above referenced project. The following i EB srrEcapecodcomQ is a report.on observations and comments noted during inspection: wwwceccapewdcom 1.^ The exterior walls of the third floor are in place and truss installation is nearly . _ complete. ENcnW>ria s 2. There is one less truss type"D"than is required A'4-foot.span was_left between. civil _. trusses over the 8-inch CMU wall.To infill the framing between trusses,2x6 ladder Sanitary framing shall be installed. A 2x4 partition shall extend from the underside of the Structural ladder framing to the 2x8 double plate, which is anchored to the CMU wall below. Environmental, Marine 3. Diagonal bracing shall extend from the top of the CMU wall inward at least 3 bays a site _ and spaced at 4-foot intervals along the length of the wall (see Section C, Sheet S-3). h[irm SvxvExNG 4. Continuous lateral bracing,per truss manufacturer's specifications, was discussed on €Tlectnv[cnL SUM,y site for each truss type. oNSMUNn 5. Truss anchorage alternatives were discussed onsite and as outlined in the CEC Memo, dated 6/17/02. ^onsTni Errcu�tnac ,t Overall workmanship is good and in general conformance with the design plans and exists to help our specifications. clients achieve their' goals.We do this by Submitted by: understanding our by clients'needs; - =deistaan�di,ryg tthe�_ � issues that *pact th"p,r"# oiec ts,and by Ri6h r ryant ��toviding�appropriate � � . cocisulting,engineering i and sury 4 Cc Representation (uaons ` JohnA�-.�Bologna.P.E°. Hr "' J 3 w D.\DOC\CI5600\15616V5616.01Vnspection#2_6-19-02.doc l i STRUCTURAL INSPECTION REPORT # I OA '�TAL GIN RING COMPANY,INC. 2W Cranberry y l To: Barnstable Building Department Route 6A , I Orleans,MA 02653 Project: Cape Crossroads Condo's Job No: C15616.01 PHONE 508.255.6511 Location: 800 Bearses Way Date/Time: 6-12-02/1:00pm REPRESENTATION 508 487.9600 ��t Pmvincetown 111 h - Contractor: Rick Clark,J.K. Scanlan Co.,Inc 508.778.9600 F Hpanms Architect: Rick Fenuccio,Brown,Lindquist,Fenuccio&Richmond, Inc. FAX 508.255.6700 E-tKan. � � A construction inspection was conducted at the above referenced project.The fallowing mfo@ceccapecod'com� is a report on observations and comments noted during inspection: WEE SM vea�wceccapecodcam' 1. The;existing.8 inch:.concrete masonry walls, in the area of reconstruction, have been reinforced,,to include removal of the upper three courses,installation of#4 bars at 32"maximum spacing in grout-filled cells,installation of two common courses and a ENGINEERING bond beam course. tk Cavil Sanitary 2. Anchor bolts have been installed in the upper bond beam course every 5' Structural ` l spacing. °Environmental Marine " 3: All existing plywood floor sheathing has been removed from the floor trusses. New site 3/4'T&G floor sheathing has been installed over the 3rd floor trusses. t Lnrm SUMMING 1 4. Further inspection of the top chord member of the floor trusses reveal no apparent Tctuvicn► SExvtces compromise to the integrity of the member as a result of the fire/water damage. CONSULTANTS Overall workmanship is good and in general conformance with the design plans and specifications. �CoASTAL NGINEEFUNG 0 Submitted by: - extats to help our clients achieve their gals.we&this by understanding out ONV ch " Richard Bryant mundetstandmg the , tsaues that mvaot taus 2 V gri�jects;and h9 Cc { Representatlon, IVPoPnate' JohnABologna,P.E:. . . cnauttIng°engineering aIltl WN aurveM z 7 IIa i , s D:\DOC\C15600\15616\15616 0]Vnspection#1_6-12-02.doc STRUCTURAL INSPECTION REPORT # 3 .��OA aTA►L I RING CO-NII'ANY,INC. 260 Cr�aberry Highway , To: Barnstable Building Department Saute 6A Orleans,11A 02653 Project: Cape Crossroads Condos Job No: C15616.01 0.2 5 08.2E 5.6511 Location: 800 Bearses Way, Hyannis Date/Time: 7-09-02/11:00am Orleaa� 508.487.9600 REPRESENTATION Q PrOVill-CIMVIM i Contractor: Rick Clark,J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc FAX: 508-540-9222 508.778.9600 l Hyannis ' Architect: Rick Fenuccio, Brown,Lindquist,Fenuccio&Richmond, Inc. FAX 508.255.6700 &MAILA construction inspection was conducted at the above referenced project. The following info@Q c ecodxcm ! is a report on observations and comments noted during inspection: WEB s fE j www#cwecod.com ! 1. Trusses are installed and sheathed. Most of the required truss anchor ties are in place; additional anchors to be installed as specified. a. ENGMBING 2. Areas of conventional roof overframing(at the stairwells and at the roof Civil- intersection)have been completed and sheathed. Sanity Strwural = 3. Continuous lateral bracing per truss manufacturer's recommendations is in place. &wi' ""al 4. Required diagonal bracing at the interior 8-inch CMU was discussed on site and Marine Site shall be installed. This is to consist of 2x4's extending from the top plate inward to 8vxveiuvc the fourth truss and fastened at each intersection with the vertical web member,at LA?etwo locations, each side of the CMU wall. TMMc MG I CoNs'JLTANTS Overall workmanship is good and in general conformance with the design plans and - specifications. COMM ENGINIMUNG � Submitted by: exist::to help our I dies s achieve their ' goals.We do this by undersanding otu Richard Bryant dims'needs;by undsratsding the: _ issues that vact-their j Cc: Representation protects,and by John A. Bologna,P.E. prov,ding appropriate consulting,engineering and surveying Sol�mons it D:IDOCIC15600115616115616.0Illnspection#3 7-09-02.doc Commonwealth of Massachusetts BARNSTABLE SS. SUPERIOR Court Docket No. 02-00130 NEW LONDON COUNTY INSURANCE CO.,ET AL. Plaintiff(s) M.R.C.P. 6 vs. Rule 30(a) & Rule 45 �• ® G �. BROAN NUTONE,LLC AND SHORELAND REAL ESTATE, INC. ' <¢�oA� Defendant(s) ,�� -� To: THOMAS PERRY ®0��j��s� ASST. HYANNIS BUILDING COMMISSIONER 200 MAIN STREET HYANNIS,MA Greetings: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED in the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in accordance with the provisions of Rule 45 of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure to appear and testify on behalf of DEFENDANT before a Notary Public of the Commonwealth, at the office of CAPE CODDER HOTEL Attorney ANTHONY J. ANTONELLIS , No. 1225 IYANOUGH ROAD,RT. 132 , in the City of HYANNIS,MA , on the 23RD day of JULY , 2002, at 1:00 o'clock PM , and to testify as to your knowledge, at the taking of the deposition in the above-entitled action. PLEASE CONTACT ATTORNEY ANTHONY J. ANTONELLIS AT(617)523-6010 WITH QUESTIONS. Hereof fail not as you will answer your default under the pains and penalties in the law in that behalf made and provided rr� Dated MAY 22 2Q020AVIp ANTHONY J. ANTONELLIS Attorney for DEFENDANT 1225 IYANOUGH ROAD,RT. 132 = m. Address HYANNIS,MA My Commission expires Febr ' O060T. City or Town *Strike out the words"And you are further required to bring with you"unless the subpoena is to require the Production of Documents or tangible things,in which case production of documents or tangible things should be designated in the space provided. ;1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BARNSTABLE, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. 02-00130 NEW LONDON COUNTY INSURANCE CO, ) as Subrogee of Cape Crossroads Condo. Trust ) AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as ) Subrogee of Audrey O'Brien, Shawn O'Donnell, ) and Robert O'Donnell, ) HINGHAM MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO., ) as Subrogee of Christopher J. Booras, ) UNION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO., ) as Subrogee of Paul and Jeanne Adams, ) NORFOLK& DEDHAM MUTUAL INSURANCE) COMPANY, as Subrogee of Gaii. M. Lussier, ) Plaintiffs, ) V. ) BROAN NUTONE, LLC., and ) SHORELAND REAL ESTATE, INC. ) Defendants. ) NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION' TO: Christopher A. Duggan, Esq. Smith & Duggan LLP Two Center Plaza Boston, MA 02108 Joanne L. Goulka, Esq. Griffin & Goulka 92 Montvale Avenue Stoneham, MA 02180 Please take notice that at 1:00 p.m. on July 23, 2002 at the Cape Codder Hotel, 1225 Iyanough Road, Route 132, Hyannis, MA, the defendant in this action, by her attorney, will take the deposition upon oral examination of Thomas Perry, Assistant Hyannis Building_ Commissioner, 200 Main Street, Hyannis, , MA pursuant to the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure before a Notary Public, in and for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or before some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths. IL V r •� J a r Y' The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. You are invited to attend and cross-examine. Respectfully submitted, Plaintiff, NEW LONDON COUNTY INSURANCE CO. By it torneys, thony J. Antonellis BBO No. 557964 John A. Donovan III BBO No. 631110 SLOANE AND WALSH, LLP. Dated: / `�✓' Three Center Plaza Boston, MA 02108 617-523-6010 -2- 4-26-2002 10123AM FROM HYANNIS FIRE/RESCUE. E08 778 6448 HYANMS FUKE DEPARTMENT IA�,t 95 HIGH SCHOOL RO. EXT. HvANNIS, MA.02601 1 . HAROLD S. BRUNELLE, CHIEF �errawra'� y�g '�[��7 g� anoear av�aaua or riaF am`eazw"n yir nv. .,FIRE PRE r ENTP L B lJ 3USINES$PHONE:(508)775.1300 FACSIMILE PHONE:(508)778-6448 TF.)DQ)N_ LD H,CHASE,JJRL, CFI LT. IERIC X.HITBLER,CFI 1FIR.F PpXvFL�PY';oN OFFICER FIRE PFLEVENTION OMCER BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE FORM THIS FIRE PREVENTION SUREAI).HAS REVIEWEC.THE FLANS DATED S n Z FOR THE PROPERTY L�TEI) AT ALSO KNOWN AS:__....-.T. , 5 � THE .CHART BELOW INDICATES THE STATUS OF OUR REVIEW: TYP.E.OF.CtJtVSTI�tJ'6Tlgid.[?nCL�ME T, NlA RECEIVED REVIEWED E COMPLIES 1�N_A8RATIVE REAOR��.�.N.._- 21=9F?E FIGHTId�iG 1 RESCUE ACCESS .....YE._.._. ACC -HYDRANT LOItATION/WATER SUPPLY' 4-SPRINKLER SYSTEMS . ... _.._ _. _.__....- _._,.._�...._....... .,...., -- 5 SPRINKLER CONTROL PGUIPMENT . -r 6-STANDPIPE 7-sTANCPIPE VALVEt9CATIQNS: T. .... _. . 8-FIRE D£PARTt I8N O},ECTI0N d Z 2 l0 9=FIRE PROTECTIVE SIGNALING SYST. 4__ . t t'' ��_.... _ 10-F,P.S.:S. &ANNUNCIATOR LOCATION 1-SMOKE GONTRbI_/EXHAUST _ -- f 12-SMOKE CONTROL. EQUIP. I_QCAtIOIv 13 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEM FEATURES % u-rnI_I-XTINGUISHING SYSTEMS i 1/ _ 1:>-F.E.S.CONTROL EQUIP LOCATION I - 16-FipE.F'RU'TI=C'PION ROOMS _ 17-F1RE PROTECTION EQUIP SIGNAGE v - i 107ALARM-7RANSMISSION MSTH0,0 ,. _.,..,....... — - .._-..... 1.9-SE.fUEivCE OF OPERAT',ON REPORT ^ ` 2,o'ACCEPTANCE.TESTING CIi1TSFilA { WE SE�LIEv HE OCUMENTS TO BE COMPLIANT FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, WE HA E CO y LETED THE ACCEPTANCE"TESTING FORTH£OCCUPANCY PERMIT ANIa BI=LIEVc THAT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT,THE ASOVS iSSUES APE IN COMPLIANCE. i LETE•Fi7IRE CONSULTANTS 5C9£3' 389 4442 1-. 02 i LETENDRtE-C®NSUi,'FANTS Tel(508)339-4444 79 tiooh M&M Strect a Mansfield,IAA 02048 Pax(508)339-4442 CRdSSROADS CONDOMINIUMS—Bldg.#4 ft'V, ?-NNIS,--vMSSA►CJf USETTS EI.E,tTRTCAL,suRiTiY pER.FGRivmD JANUARY 29, 2002 A j LETENORP N%x 26iv ✓ v By Xic*d C. Letendre,PE o LLJ LL 90 3EM6 �. r Cd :aa'n'+�cwsuat'..:tv:r::a,'earxt.�uu".:^sasunv;;'. - r +'amreic.c�nwYwaeavwu..... :H(lf(L`erR SCA LIB 61ai(XTYtR2lmbf,�y�,;,gµgy =rya Company, I nC. General Contractor •Design/Build n/Build•Construction Management • 9 g Restoration January;Z, 2002 Town of Barnstable Building;Deparimeat. Atm Toni Perry, Building Inspector 200 lklaiti Street C Hyannis, MA 02601 Via Facsimile. & CIS`Ifail 08-790-6230 Re: Crossroads Condoviiin1umS Y` Dear Tom, T>..e folloWing progress has been made regarding the Crossroads Project. 1. Structural report by Coastal Engineering will be complete by early next week. 2. Electrical will be by Bayside Electrical and his consultant, complete by latee next week. 3. PlumbinU v Al be by Sagamore Plurnbirxg & Heating and his consultant and will be complete by late next weak. 4: Diversified Environmeatal has been contacted regarding a hazardous material's sur<�ev, 5. .Able Restoration has been retained to complete an air quality survey including mold and mildew abatement.fecluirement.s. 1 ;;hould have all reports compiled for an anticipated tneetiolo date of Thursday-or .Friday of ne;{t.\ ,eek at your office. After yutir review of these documents Nve Would like to discuss the Possibility of a limited pe,mit to mo')ilize and st.an.demolition operations. Falmouth Technology Park- IS Research Road• East Falmouth, MA 02536-4440.508-540-6226 A4torY+.vv.YwM..:Y.x:I:L.'.mw'e'J-s-n.:ep,.+n.nname.:u....xe x.v'Ki-+e'Heb?h.xMrcM'!V1i�w;w..:h'epTWtlPNI W®�.YN461OfA4lNY..'.lYY.:Y.'IX:!au Main Fax 508-540-9222•Esti^eating Fax 508-540-0938•E-Maim ikscanlari@lkscanian.com TO H;Vd ZZZ6_Ov9-8O9 8U:9T ZHOZ/Z.Z/18 t We understand a.full bu;l.dtng permit could not be issued until construction documents have been submitted, which tke antkdpate to be 3 to 4 weeks latex. Pease feel free to contact me with any questior, or concerns regaruing this project. Sincerely, .JA. Scanlan Company, Inc. Jim F. Ste_dler Pre-Construction Services FSrjp Cc: 13i.11 13alaschi File 02.14-Pre-Construction Sera-ices ZB 39V6 kt7NVOS ?+f ZZZ6-OVS-899 8v 9T 7100Z171Z/T9 r 03/29/2002 10:57 5083622828 BLFR ARCHITECTS PAGE 01 BROWN LINDQUIST FENUCCIO & RICHMOND ARCHITECTS,. INC . goo FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET To: Tom Perry PROK Richard Fenuccio COWANY; DATE: - Town of Barnstable-Building Dept ?March 29,2002 FAX NUMBER 7'OTA.I.No (?F PI'.CJl S JN0:J UDTNG COVER: p� 508-790-6230 5 ^ PHONE NUMBER! cc R.lchard Clark (JR Scanlan) FAX: 508-540-9222_ RE Y,�JR=1kP.:NCL NUAtE�R _ Ca a Crossroads Condominium I CA D URGENT FOR REVIEW El FOR.YOUR USE ❑Pj.rASE RI:PJ,Y ❑PLEAM" XVI CYCLE: N77 /COMMENTS: Tom: In anticipation of next Monday's meeting,I wanted to forward the attached correspondence so you have a chance to review what I am most interest in discussing. Thanks for your help. Rick Fennecio 923 IMAIN STREET, XARMOU'THPORT, MA 0205 Sus3 36L-8382 508-362-2828 (PAR.) f 03/29/2002 10:57 5083622828 BLrR ARCHITECTS PAGE 02 n �IIII''(�IIIIIIIIIIII�I' � �D BROWN LINDQUIST FENUCCIO & RICHMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. J 28 March 2002 W.Thomas Perry,Building Inspector . Town of Barnstable 200 Main Street Hyannis,.MA 02601 RE: Proposed Construction Classification Partial Reconstruction of Cape Crossroads Condominitun 800 Bearses way,Hyannis Dear Mr. Perry: Our firm is in the progress of preparing final Construction Documents for the subject project. In order to complete the construction detailing,we are seeking your opinion and / or confirmation of the construction classification as outlined in the attached code summary. As you know,the existing building is a three story unprotected wood frame structure without an automatic sprinkler system. As part of the proposed"substantial alterations", a new 13R Automatic Sprinkler System and updated Fire Alarm System.are being proposed and currently under design by others. We are proposing to maintain the existing Type 5b Construction Classification based upon the allowable increases in h_eighf and area limitations due to the installation of the sprinkler systern. Our maximum allowable per floor area increases to 9,600 square feet as related to the 10,312 square feet currently existing(deficit of 712 square feet or 7%over allowable). It is our opinion that this scenario could be accepted by the Building Department as a compliance alternative under 780 CMR Ch. 34 or we can gain full compliance by implementing a street frontage increase as defined in Section 506.2. 923 MAIN STREET ROUTE 6A YARMOUTHPORT MA 02675 40.48 NORTH MAIN STREET V.-IDDLE60f(O MA 02.346 PH_503-362-8382 FAX 508-362-2628 FH SOR-92-3-4616 WWW.CArEARCHITECT�.CON f 03/29 2002 10:57 5083622828 BLFR ARCHITECTS PAGE 03 We respectfully request your review and cozrnnentary of the attached Code Summary. If acceptable,this Code Summary will be included in our Construction Documents and will serve as the basis for the Building Permit Application to follow. Thank you for your assistance and please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, Brown Lindquist Fenuccio&Richmond Architects, Inc. e � Richard P. Fenuccio Enc. Code Summary cc' R.Clark(J.)ft". Scanlan),J.Bologna(Coastal Engineering),G.Russo(BLF&R Architects) RPF/mm r '03/2942002 10:57 5083622828 BLFR ARCHITECTS PAGE 04 Noun ri � l BROWN LINDQUIST FENUCCIO & RICHMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. U 28 March 2002 Project: Cape Crossroads Condominium Use group Classification: Residential R-2 to remain Construction Classification: Type 5b (Unprotected wood Frame) to remain Height c&Area Limitations Allowance: 2 Stories/35' Height 4,800 sq. ft. /floor Existing Building 3 Stories/ Height 10,312 sq. ft,per floor (30,936 Gross Total exclusive of decks& exterior stairs) ftmed General Post-Fire Improvements 1. Installation of 13R Automatic Fire Suppression System 2. Upgrade of Fire Alarm System 3. Upgrade of certain Electrical System components 923 MAIN STREET ROUTE 6A Y.ARMOUTHPORT MA 02675 40-48 NORTH MAIN STREET MIGaLEBORO MA. 02346 PH 508-362-8382 FAX 508-362-2528 PH 598-923-4615 INW�N.(;AflE•'kiC'HITFC'S.COP,�1 L 03/29/2002 10:57 5083622628 ELFR ARCHITECTS PAGE 05 Prelirrunary Construction Classification Review Cape Cmssmads Condominium 26 March 2002 Height&Area Modifications with Automatic Syrinkler System (CMR 504.2) Allowable Height Increase= One Additional Story(20') 3 Stories/ 55 Feet (CMR 506.3) Allowable Area Increase for Buildings over 2 Stories 100% 9,600 square feet (CMR 506.2) Area limitations maybe increased 2%for each 1%of Street Frontage Increase building street frontage in excess of 25%when fronting on street or others. Existing Building Frontage (2 sides of building) on Rte. 132 = 281 linear feet 50%of Total Street Frontage 2%x 25 =50%Increase +2,400 sg. ft. allowable Increase (4,800 sq. ft. x .50) Adjusted Allowable Area J Floor — 9,600 sq. ft. +2,400 sq, ft. = 12,000 sq. ft. 7 10,312 sq, ft. provided Rfuired Fire Resistance Ratings of Structure Elements (per 780CMR Table 602) for TyRe 5b Construction Exterior Walls(load bearing) — 0 fours Interior Walls(load bearing) = 0 Hours Non-Lead Bearing Partitions = 0 Hours Dwelling Unit Separations(Horizontal) a 1. Hour � Floor/Ceiling Assemblies — Roof Construction = 0 Hours (including beams,trusses & frarning) a �� 1 � ah � y . �� h u ��_ �u ��T-� .JK Transmittal Cover Sheet SCANLAN Company, Inc. Detailed, Grouped by Each Transmittal Number 0214-Cape Crossroads Project# 0214 Tel: Fax: D. 00 000. Thomas Perry William Balaschi Town of Barnstable J.K. Scanlan Company, Inc. 367 Main St 15 Research Road Hyannis, MA 02601 East Falmouth, MA 02536-4440 Tel:508-862-4038 Tel: 508-540-6226 Fax: 508-790-6230 Fax: 508-540-9222 Package�TransmrttedFor ��` �a � w,; �Deliuered Ufa �--, :;� Trackm Number, :"' Review U S Mail Mold Survey 001 1.0 Survey Mold Survey J.K. Scanlan Company, Inc. FFile 1 0214-02080 Please see the enclosed mold survey. Asbestos, lead and PCB survey's to follow. Signature Signed Date Prolog Manager Printed on: 2/15/2002 jks 2001 Page 1 ,j Diversirriedt Environmental Corp. February 11, 2002 JK Scanlon Company, Inc. Falmouth Technology Park 15 Research Road East Falmouth, MA 02536-4400 Attention: Mr. Jim Steidler, Project Manager Reference: 800 Cross Road Condominiums,Hyannis, MA: Mold Inspection Diversified Environmental Corporation Project#02-08 Dear Mr. Steidler: On February 4, 2002, DEC performed a site walkthrough at the 800 Cross Road Condominiums located in Hyannis, MA. The walkthrough was initiated due to recent fire in the building as well as associated water damage. DEC's Project Manager, Michael Oriola performed the walkthrough. As noted in Appendix A, the findings of the walkthrough identified suspect mold growth throughout the impacted areas, adjacent areas and some additional areas. Also,Appendix B contains a photographic log of the conditions at the time of the inspection. Based on the visual observations and findings, the conditions in the units already demolished to rough studs show significant water damage with signs of potential mold growth throughout. The growth was observed on all the wood surfaces in the units. Additionally, immediately adjacent units not demolished show signs of potential mold growth at ceilings and could possibly contain water damage with potential mold growth behind walls adjacent to fire damaged and demolished units. The two-bedroom units on the south side, farthest from the fire showed minor potential mold issues, which may be pre-existing conditions(i.e. bathroom ceilings, sliding doors to outside, etc.), while others showed no issues. ol o f 17 Accord Park Drive • Suite 200 • Norwell • MA • 02061 • Tel.(781)871-4900 • Fax(781)878-1151 • E-mail denvcorp.com �a JK Scanlon.Company,Inc.. 800 Cross Road Condominiums Mold Inspection February 11,2002 Page 2 of 2 If the demolished spaces were dried-out of moisture and standing water, then all wood surfaces can be cleaned with a 10% bleach solutions to remove any remaining potential mold on the surfaces. Prior to use of this wood, it is recommended that an engineer be retained to determine if the wood is suitable for reuse. However, based on the extent of visible water damage observed by DEC, it appears unlikely that the wood material could be sufficiently dried-out. With regard to units directly adjacent to fire damage, existing ceilings and walls that have been noted as containing potential mold should be removed and concealed spaces behind and above inspected for potential mold and addressed as noted above. Two-bedroom units on the south side that show limited areas with potential mold should be addressed by proper cleaning. The penetrations at sliders in bedrooms that may be contributing to moisture inside the units should also be sealed. Finally, based on DEC's overall observations and findings, we recommend that the remaining wood surfaces in Section 1 & 2 be removed as opposed to attempting to dry out and clean. It is recommended that water damaged areas in Section 3 be removed and surfaces behind walls and ceilings adjacent to Section 2 be.further investigated. If you have any questions or require further information,please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Diversified Environmental Michael F. Tibert Director of Technical Services Cc: Wes Straub, Certified Industrial Hygienist C W 9C' O C "C3 � � a a CJ C. UQ y MEMO Date: February 8, 2002 Attention: Jim Steidler, JK Scanlon Company, Inc. From: Michael Tibert, Diversified Environmental Corporation(DEC) CC: Wesley Straub, Straub Industrial Hygiene Reference: Water Damage and Mold Issues: 800 Cross Road Condominiums,Falmouth,MA Dear Mr. Martin: On February 4, 2002, DEC performed a walkthrough of the 800 Cross Road Condominiums. The walkthrough includes eight units below the six units the units where the fire occurred as well as six units directly adjacent to fire damage and six units outside of impacted area. In addition, DEC briefly looked at the six units on the southside of the building. DEC prepared a rough map of the building to easily identify areas being discussed. The following is a breakdown of DEC's initial comments: Section 1 Item No. 1 First floor units have been demolished to the wood studs. Potential mold is visible on the plywood deck and wood rafters. Moisture from water is still evident on the floors, walls and ceiling of the unit. Extent of potential mold is less evident as you go from the ceiling to floor level. ,Extensive water damage is present throughout; Item No. 2 First and second floors have white debris on the floor, most likely due to sheetrock removal; Pagel U4 MEMO Section 1 Item No. 3 Second floor units have been demolished to the wood studs. Potential mold is visible on the plywood deck and wood rafters. Moisture from water is still evident on the floors, walls and ceiling of the unit. Extent of potential mold is less evident as you go from the ceiling to floor level. Extensive water damage is present throughout; Item No. 4 Exterior decks and siding have black soot throughout; ' Item No. 5 The units located on the third floor do not exist anymore due to fire. Section 2 Item No. 1 The units located on the third floor do not exist anymore due to fire. Item No. 2 Second floor units have been demolished to the wood studs. Potential mold is visible on the plywood deck and wood rafters as well as plywood walls. Extent of potential mold is less then what was observed in Section 1. Moisture from the water damage is still evident on the floors, walls and ceilings of the unit. Extensive water damage throughout; Item No. 3 First floor units have been demolished to the wood studs. Potential mold is visible on the plywood deck and wood rafters are extensive. The presence of potential mold on plywood walls is minimal. Standing water is present on the cement floor. Moisture from the water damage is still evident on the floors, walls and ceilings of the unit. Extensive water damage throughout; Section 3 Item No. 1 The room adjacent to section 2 within the units located on the third floor has been gutted out due to fire. Units show signs of water damage with potential mold; Page 2 of 4 MEMO Section 3 (cont.) Item No.2 Second floor units show signs of water damage on the ceiling from the bathroom&back bedroom. The extent of water staining extends 20 feet from the adjacent fire damaged areas. Interior trim of outside bedroom sliders leading to outside and bathroom ceiling showed signs of potential mold, which may possibly be a pre-existing-condition although not able to verify. Potential for water damage/mold behind sheetrock ceilings and walls is high; Item No. 3 First floor units showed no signs of water damage or potential mold except for the bathroom ceiling, which showed signs of water damage and is possibly an existing condition and not related to the fire. Also, potential for water damage/mold behind sheetrock ceilings and walls is high. DEC is unable to determine if potential mold present behind walls; unless evasive inspections are performed. Common areas show minor signs of water damage but no visible potential mold; Section 4 Item No. 1 The units located on the third floor of the building were accessed by the fire department as front door knocked down. No signs of water damaged were observed; Item No.2 Second floor units show signs of potential mold at trim of doors to deck. No other signs of visible potential mold or water damage observed; Item No. 3 First floor units show signs of potential mold at trim of doors to deck. No other signs of visible potential mold or water damage observed. Page 3 of 4 MEMO Section 5 Item No. 1 The units located on the third floor of the building were not accessible during our walkthrough; Item No. 2 Second floor units show signs of potential mold in bathroom ceiling, which may possible be a pre-existing condition although due to present water damage issues in the building this condition appears to be worsening; Item No.3 First floor units showed no signs of water damage or potential mold although the presence of strong odors (from cats) may be of concern. If you have any questions, please free to contact me. Thank you. Page 4 of 4 T v S,N►n tn,�,o lam` N� _-1-�� S S S Q�I'D Q O R> rd �' 0 ..► • o ara �o � � � �' .a e� a A C � A C7 A� ... O L7 t Y. NF ' i. `^�� ' C'•ram"., �� -r.,;.: Qd T te SCENE: Water on wood floor LOCATION: 2"d Fir. North under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 3 DATE: 2/4/02 dd x! Jim q . ,� .�` °� "-� — � �+awe �� °- _f,. q•� F i d SCENE: Water on wood floor LOCATION: 2"d Fir.North under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 4 DATE: 2/4/02 6 €' SCENE: Mold on Plywood Ceiling& Studs LOCATION: V Flr. North under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 1 DATE: 2/4/02 -44 ` r� ..#.3�v.tea" - - - �s .e•�-:� � . off+•, �. i _ - SCENE: Plywood Ceiling& Studs LOCATION: 1 'Fir. North under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 2 DATE: 2/4/02 q i fA wr r a M'• _e of ��`� a 3'c tr��'� .�P iT3F`�T—�� ib• ��.`��Y �^ g e �� > r- womm — e �.�� • 1..._�� _ �� - 1. f � e� Ig t_ y {� € .{ t E i � u z Aft tz SW rya,M,•y ''.. •.�'4'- IY hill 1L• r.-� $3'-ax"i7. dear'- `�'—'ry '' '.a:�3i #1-. TTTT [E • .. . .�a- rr ,.. .z•7my=.� it .+�o.wR+a'`^'^y. i � � '� 4 I, { I , 1 1 iPAN v XWE YI I Ilk 1.'r� ` ------------- s ---•-- ---- .+ , . �t 't Ts— All i fie � ��< �._ .-.•. � i �-�. sac s.�v`•- �-.,.. 3 ',,w�•_.•..6;. - „ ��k�;s��f f'� ; - .4�k �_ I 7 f��••� f _ _.tee v �-a„`'�,R.,�„-'M� : - r, 1 1 1 1 KZ WE MW ti �'` "''1' �•�€a ors € r s Y•€``"�::�� IN11.1 srT owl Al si F —7AJj '��_ eye- Fpy — �..� � � � ±•3_ E Am 1 1 1 t � • . „. if T_ POO— x v- s31. MOp 'i 111 1 t 1 1 11 t . '+!W' M1lk "'4 \ 1�' i`Yac""}. f�� i•T� 0 WE s.�S. a't'�`Ssr,� 6 •rt�r ��1-i r w. Ili � a t � a i 3 ag yw.-.•.ram-r..+ `\..� YF} €*, r>a �i,* y�.!'Er �M`.�1J� �:”�+.:r,?•'•r '�J sI'+� r. - ��w->`t In��s�y��c��' {. � ay„•" Vx;-''1 a 4r�.A 4 1..i`' '�•. 1 �•t"a c#�#y"' 4+ems Woo �•�J S Ian rs �� •T t 4- �'�, €� r ; 1,17.110 lActlJO 1 1 1 I V I A 04- J Z ;& Ad .zip -.. SCENE: Stain on bathroom ceiling LOCATION: 2 d Floor apartments SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 21 DATE: 2/4/02 %Y SCENE: Wood rafters with water damage LOCATION: Yd Floor apartments SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 22 DATE: 2/4/02 ` SCENE: Common area after section of fire LOCATION: 1"Floor common area SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 19 DATE: 2/4/02 _ * a y .s`0 - ANs ev - 3 —F X Z. jr z � _ .. A SCENE:Water damage on bathroom ceiling LOCATION: 2"d Floor apartments SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 20 DATE: 2/4/02 - R 441, My _ Rf 9 - a _ 4 sJE- la _ € "a- -s z g N ~ 4 s SCENE: Water damage in bathroom LOCATION: Adjacent to burnt section SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 17 DATE: 2/4/02 10 ' _ y it p SCENE: Potential for water damage LOCATION: Adjacent to burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 18 DATE: 2/4/02 •tea,,. A., r� -_ s ' ott Uw 7— x. Af a ' s Awoth * . _ - - j ' - SCENE: Standing water on cement floor LOCATION: 1"Fir. (NE) under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 15 DATE: 2/4/02 +F SCENE: Standing water on floor LOCATION: V Fir. (NE) under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 16 DATE: 2/4/02 �.. aa _ - g z f 1.0 _ n TM 'r - - € lbE x SCENE: Mold on plywood wall LOCATION:2"d Floor(NE)under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 13 DATE: 2/4/02 t d, SCENE: Ceiling with mold&water damage LOCATION: 2nd Flr. (NE) under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 14 DATE: 2/4/02 G ioi 3 i 6 a SCENE: Burnt unit LOCATION:Outside,Adjacent to 2 bedrooms SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 11 DATE: 2/4/02 t i Ff f�'.'iw.rgtl@41F •- - - - - '�' __ ___raw} �_..r.+�ar-sr �.w.�rl�� . .. .............. _ - _ t� s 3 SCENE: Wood Plywood Ceiling with mold LOCATION: 2°d Fir. (NE) under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 12 DATE: 2/4/02 Q��2 + i }j 4. SCENE: North Side LOCATION: Outside of building(North) SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 9 DATE: 2/4/02 � n y _ c4 i SCENE: Burnt unit LOCATION: Outside of building(North) SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 10 DATE: 2/4/02 ,� �♦ "� tom..-•-..r�� s-� r "�" � q.� _ - �:.•, - __ t � � s� R SCENE: Mold on wood rafters LOCATION: 2"d Flr. North under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 7 DATE: 2/4/02 € - - § s ¢`mm _ _ ` f ` Y a t= ` ate - 3 �> _ � a _ ' f r F lip $ .t + i - Vot xr t�= ij #� 2-0 AL SCENE: Black soot on siding LOCATION: Front deck(North) SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 8 DATE: 2/4/02 a .� _ T a a is MOO- , SCENE: Rafters with minimal mold,very wet LOCATION: 2"d Fir. North under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 5 DATE: 2/4/02 e �=14 , S11W m 4 d < a6 f SCENE: Floor with white film LOCATION: 2"d Fir.North under burnt units SITE NAME: 800 Cross Road Condos PROJECT NUMBER: 02-08 FRAME NUMBER: 6 DATE: 2/4/02 Mi, g" G y t i IT' $ i 4 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS REPAIR,ALTERATION,ADDITION AND CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS Historic Places. Historic building shall be further change in use or occupancy or additions. As defined as totally or partially preserved building& used in 780 CMR 34, substantial renovation or All entries into the totally preserved building list substantial alteration shall have the following shall be certified by the Massachusetts Historical meanings;Substantial renovation and substantial Commission. The Board of Building Regulations alteration is work'which is major in scope and and Standards shall ratify all buildings or expenditure when compared to the work and structures certified by the Massachusetts expenditure required for the installation of a fire Historical Commission to qualify for totally protection system, when such system is required preserved listing(see Appendix H). by 780 CMR 9 for a particular use group. The Partially preserved buildings: (a)Any building or building official shall make such determination structure individually listed on the National and may request the owner or applicant to provide Register of Historic Places or(b)any building such supporting information as is necessary to or structure certified as a historic building by make such determination the Massachusetts Historical (Commission/t 780 CM OR 3402.0 IMPLEMENTATION and not designated a totally preserved building in Appendix H. 3402.1 Building Permit Application Requirements for Existing Buildings: A building Restoration: Restoration is the process of permit shall be required for any work regulated by accurately reconstructing or repairing the 780 CMR 34. forms and details of a building or structure or portion thereof as it appeared at a particular Exception: Ordinary repairs may be performed period or periods of time by means of removal without a building permit. of later work/or the replacement of missing 3402.1.1 Investigation and evaluation: For any original work proposed work regulated by 780 CMR 34,which Totally preserved buildings: A totally preserved is subject to 180 CMR 116, as a condition of the building is an historic building or structure. issuance of a building permit the building owner The principal use of such a building or shall cause the existing building (or portion structure must be as an exhibit of the building thereof) to be investigated and evaluated in or the structure itself which is open to the accordance with the provisions of 780 CMR 34 public not less than 12 days per year,although (see Appendix F). additional uses,original and/or ancillary to the The investigation and evaluation shall be in principal use shall be permitted within the sufficient detail to ascertain the effects of the same building up to maximum of 40% of the proposed work(if any)on the structural, egress, gross floor area. Totally preserved buildings fire protection, energy conservation systems and shall be those listed in Appendix H All entries light and ventilation systems of the space under into the totally preserved building list shall be consideration and, where necessary, the entire certified by the Massachusetts Historical building or structure. Commission. The Board of Building Regulations and Standards shall ratify all 3402.1.2 Submittal: The results of the buildings or structures certified by the investigation and evaluation, along with any Massachusetts Historical Commission to proposed compliance alternatives, shall be qualify for totally preserved listing (See submitted to the building official in written report Appendix H). form. 3402.1.3 Non Conformities and Compliance Seismic Hazard Category: A numerical value, Alternatives: The application for a building between 1 and 3, which is based on a proposed permit shall identify all items of non or partial change in use, change in occupancy and cost of alterations in order to determine which of the compliance with the requirements of 780 CMR34, and compliance alternatives, if any are provisions of 780 CMR 3408 apply to the proposed, for approval by the building official.proposed work on the existing building. The The building official shall respond to the Seismic Hazard Category is a relative scale used acceptability of any proposed compliance only to determine applicable provisions of alternatives within 30 days of the filing of the 780 CMR 34. Seismic Hazard Categories are building permit application.• Where proposed listed in Table 3408.1 compliance alternatives are,in the opinion of the Substantial Renovation, or Substantial Alteration: t building official,unacceptable,or where issues.of non-compliance remain;the permit applicant shall The terms substantial renovation and substantial have the remedies prescribed by 780 CMR 122.0. i alteration are defined herein for the specific purpose of determining whether fire protective 3402.1.5 Documentation of compliance systems are required in existing buildings, when alternatives: Whenever action is taken on any such buildings undergo renovations or alterations, building permit application to repair, make 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 447 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS REPAIR,ALTERATION,ADDITION AND CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS 3404.8 Means of egress lighting: Means of egress 3404.15 Institutional Use Groups:Notwithstanding lighting shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of 780 CMR 3404,Institutional Use 780 CMR 1024.0. Groups shall comply with the provisions of 780 CMR 3400.3,item 7. 3404.9 Height and Area limitations: The height and area requirements of 780 CMR 5 shall apply to 3404.16 Residential Use Groups:Notwithstanding existing buildings when such existing buildings are the provisions of 780 CMR 3404, Residential Use modified by addition and/or change in use. Groups shall comply with the provisions of Modifications to the height and area requirements as 780 CMR 3400.3,item 8. provided in 780 CMR 504.0 and 506.0 are permitted. 3404.17 Fire hazard to adjacent buildings: Any proposed change in the use or occupancy of an 3404.10 Existing Fire and party walls: No further existing building which has the effect of increasing compliance is required with 780 CMR.707.0. The the fire hazard to adjacent buildings shall comply height above the roof of existing fire, party and with the requirements of Table 705.2 for exterior exterior walls need not comply with 780 CMR wall fire resistance rating requirements, or with 3404.0 approved compliance alternatives. 3404.11 Fire Protection Systems: Fire Protection 3404.18 Accessibility for Persons with Systems: Design, installation and maintenance of Disabilities: Accessibility requirements shall be in fire protection systems shall be provided in accordance with 521 CMR as listed in Appendix A. accordance with 780 CMR 3404.3 and 780 CMR 3404.12 as applicable. 3404.19 Energy Conservation: Energy conservation requirements shall be in accordance 3404.12 Fire protection systems are required`for with 780 CMR 3407.0. the following cases: 1. Additions where required by 780 CMR 9.0 for 780 CMR 3405.0 REQUIREMENT FOR the specific use group. CHANGE IN USE GROUP TO TWO OR 2. For existing buildings and additions to existing MORE HAZARD INDICES GREATER buildings, where required by 780 CMR 9 or � where required by 780 CMR 506 to satisfy height 3405.1 General: When the existing use group is and area requirements. changed to a new use group of two or more hazard 3. Existing buildings,or portions thereof which I indices higher (as provided in Table 3403), the existing building shall conform to the requirements are substantially altered or substantially renovated, and where otherwise required by of the code for new construction,except as provided 780 CMR 9.0 for the specific use group. Cin CMR 3408 or as otherwise allowed in 780 CMR 3407.0. Note: Notwithstanding the provisions of 780 CMR 3404.12, automatic Fire Suppression 3405.2 Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities: systems are required in municipalities which have Accessibility requirements shall be in accordance adopted the provisions of MGL c148 §26G,H or with 521 CMR as listed in Appendix A. 1(See Official Interpretation Number 45-96 listed in Appendix B). 780 CMR 3406.0 COMPLIANCE 3404.13,Enclosure of stairways: Open stairways ALTERNATIVES are prohibited except in one- and two-family 3406.1 General: Where compliance with the dwellings or unless otherwise permitted by provisions of the code for new construction,required 780 CMR 10. There shall be no minimum by 780 CMR 34, is impractical because of fireresistance rating required for an existing construction difficulties or regulatory conflicts, enclosure of a stairway. Partitions or other new compliance alternatives may be accepted by the construction which is added in order to fully and building official. solidly enclose a stairway shall provide a minimum Examples of compliance alternatives which have fireresistance rating of one hour. All doors in the been used are provided in Appendix F. The enclosure shall be self.-closing and tight-fitting with building official may accept these compliance approved hardware. All doors in those portions of alternatives or others proposed. the stairway which are fireresistance rated shall comply to the applicable provisions of 180 CMR 9. 3406.2. Documentation: In accordance with 780 CMR 3402.1.5,the building official shall ensure 3404.14 Assembly Use Groups: Notwithstanding that the BBRS is provided with information the provisions of 780 CMR 3404, Assembly Use regarding compliance alternatives accepted or Groups shall comply with the provisions of rejected by the building official. 780 CMR 3400.3,item 6. 12/12/97 (Effective 8/28/97) 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 449 Town of Barnstable WebMap FullScreen Page 1 of 2 14 f a Map Layers (�= Add Remove Zoom In Zoom Out Magnifier Print Map h b b e eb e eb - o Introduction n Architects Inc. of Yarmouth ort MA. was retained on Brown Lindquist Fenuccio & Richmond p , February 1, 2002 by the General Contractor / Construction Manager J.K. Scanlan Co., Inca of Falmouth, MA. to conduct an overview evaluation of the architectural damage sustained from the November 26, 2001 fire. The subject property is Building 4 (North, East, & West sections) of the Cape Crossroads Condominium located at 800 Bearse's Way, Hyannis, MA. Methodology and Intent This report was prepared from the following information sources: ➢ An on site visual and photographic survey on February 4, 2002. ➢ Discussions with James Steidler from J.K. Scanlan Co., Inc. and Philip Ellsworth i' from Mercantile Property Management of Bourne, MA. ' ➢ A review of the original construction drawings dated June/July 1973. ➢ A review of the Massachusetts State Building Code(61h Edition). �! ➢ A discussion and review of the file at the Barnstable Building Department. property (Note: No substantial material or post-fire report was obtained from this source). �1 ➢ An initial visit to the Hyannis Fire Department did not, as of this date, turn up a post fire report to use as a reference source. It is the intention of this report to: 1. Convey our observations of the demolition and peripheral damage sustained during the fire and subsequent Fire Department operations. 2. Determine any building code deficiencies and potential upgrade requirements. 3. Provide general recommendations which may assist and guide the reconstruction efforts. Although references are made to the building's structural elements, it is not the intention of this report to provide a detailed structural evaluation of the damaged or remaining structural components including foundation, exterior bearing walls, wood floor trusses, CMU fire separation walls, and pre-engineered wood trusses. It is our understanding that a full structural evaluation is being completed by Coastal Engineering, Inc. 1 i� Building Summary Each building within the complex is 8,500 gross square feet of enclosed space per floor (25,500 s.f. total per building) exclusive of common decks and partially covered exterior egress stair towers. The basic architectural components consist of the following: ➢ The subject building (No. 4)_was apparently constructed in the early 1970's and is a three story unprotected wood frame structure (Type 5B Building Classification) with the first floor of concrete slab-on-grade construction. ➢ The exterior wood frame walls are constructed of 2 x 4 @ 16 o.c. wood studs supporting 177 deep clear span wood trusses assembled from 2 x 4 top and bottom chords, 2 x 4 diagonal braces and various plywood gusset plates. ➢ The wood floor trusses are sheathed with 3/4" plywood subflooring and are supported on the exterior 2 x 4 framed walls and "let into" and bearing on an 8" wide concrete masonry unit (CMU) wall on the opposing side. The trusses appear to be bottom chord bearing which is contrary to the original construction drawings. ➢ The fire separation walls between units are 8" wide single wythe concrete masonry units, apparently unreinforced, and extends from the first floor slab to the underside of the roof truss bottom chord. There are numerous horizontal penetrations and voids within this separation wall including general piping and wiring. ➢ The roof truss system is comprised of pre-fabricated wood trusses at 24" o.c. with 2 x 6 top chords, 2 x 4 bottom chords, and 2 x 4 diagonal bracing. The trusses are covered with %2" CDX plywood sheathing, building felt paper and asphalt shingles. ➢ The interior non-bearing partitions are a combination of 2 x 4 and 2 x 3 wood stud partitions. ➢ Although most of the between floor insulation has been removed, there is evidence of fiberglass batt insulation located between the floor trusses. ➢ The exterior framed walls have %" CDX plywood sheathing, original wood clapboards covered with vinyl clapboards and contained 3 %" thick fiberglass Batt insulation, most likely with an R-11 rating. ➢ The attics are insulated with a loose laid cellulose type insulation of varying thickness. ➢ The building fenestration consists of aluminum framed sliding windows and doors with insulated glass (Apparent Manufacturer: "Guardian" as inscribed on tempered glass.) The entry doors are 36"wide inswinging steel doors. 2 Observations There are three distinct levels-of damage: T major fire damage was contained to the Northerly side of Building 4 and 1. he � g Y g completely destroyed four third floor units (4 North—Units C &F, 4 West-Unit ' C and 4 East—Unit Q. These units have been completely destroyed down to the subflooring and the exterior decks have varying degrees of damage. 2. Substantial water, smoke and heat damage resulted at the following first and second floor units (4 North—Units A, B, D and E, 4 West—Units A & B, and 4 East-Units A&B). These units have been completely "gutted" down to the stud wall and floor truss frame.. The existing windows and doors, while intact, have undoubtedly been subjected to significant water infiltration which will affect future performance. �i Numerous seal failures were also present. The wood frame members and sheathing are completely water saturated and large areas of mold growth are present throughout. The exterior pressure-treated decks and railings appear to be ' in good and stable condition. 3. The third level of damage is primarily the result of water infiltration and '! subsequent exposure, vacancy and loss of heat and electrical power. Typical at 4 West—Units D & E, 4 East—Units D &E). '\ These units have all or most of their finishes, fixtures and equipment completely intact. The damage appears to be limited to water infiltration coming down from the third floor and attic area. The gypsum board ceilings and walls, carpets and sheet vinyl have certainly been subjected to varying degrees of water and moisture infiltration. 3 Unit Damage Summary Building Floor Unit No. Unit Type Curren_t Condition Reference Level Note 1: 4 N lst A 3 Bedroom All interior finishes & fixtures removed (North) down to stud wall & floor truss frame. Windows & doors intact. Excessive moisture, water and mold present throughout. 4 N 2nd B 3 Bedroom Note 1 Note 2: 4 N 3rd C 3 Bedroom 100% completely destroyed down to subflooring — Adjacent 8" wide CMU Fire Separation Wall intact. 4 N ls` D 3 Bedroom Note 1 4 N 2"d E 3 Bedroom Note 1 4 N 3rd F 3 Bedroom . Note 2 i 4 I Unit Dama a Summary Building Floor Unit No. Unit Type Current Condition Reference Level Note d: 4 W lst A 2 Bedroom All interior finishes & fixtures removed (West) down to stud-wall & floor truss frame. Windows & doors intact. Excessive water and mold present throughout. 4 W 2"d B 2 Bedroom Note 1 Note 2: 4 W 3rd C 2 Bedroom 100% completely destroyed down to subflooring — Adjacent 8" wide CNZU Fire Separation Wall intact. Note 3: 4 W 1st Common Laundry Room, Area is generally intact -structurally e Tenant Storage,continues Area although there is evidence of significant Electrical / Water to Service Room, water infiltration within some of the 4 E Mailbox Area, One finish materials, especially the textured Bedroom Apartment gypsum ceilings, carpets and sheet vinyl. 4 W 2nd D 2 Bedroom Note 3 4 W 3rd E 2 Bedroom Note 3 Note 4: 4 W 1st F 2 Bedroom Units undamaged. Tenant furnishings still on site. 4 W 2nd G 2 Bedroom Note 4 rd 4 W 3 H 2 Bedroom Note 4 5 Unit Dama a Summary Building Floor Unit No. Unit Type Current Condition Reference Level Note 1: 4 E 1st A 2 Bedroom All interior finishes & fixtures removed (East) down to stud wall & floor truss frame. Windows & doors intact. Excessive water and mold present throughout. 4 E 2nd B 2 Bedroom Note 1. Note 2: 4 E 3rd C 2 Bedroom 100% completely destroyed down to subflooring — Adjacent 8" wide CNW Fire Separation Wall intact. Note 3: 4 E 2nd D 2 Bedroom Area is generally intact structurally although there is evidence of significant water infiltration within some of the finish materials, especially the textured gypsum ceilings, carpets and sheet vinyl. 4 E 3Td E 2 Bedroom Note 3 Note 4: 4 E ISt F 2 Bedroom Units undamaged. Tenant furnishings still on site. 4 E 2nd G 2 Bedroom Note 4 4 E 3Td H 2 Bedroom Note 4 6 Building Code Summary and Analysis Construction issues relating to the Massachusetts State Building Code, 6`n Edition were addressed with regard to assisting in the repair and rehabilitation of this building back to full use and occupancy. The pertinent chapters which will govern are Chapter 34—Repair,Alteration, Addition and Change of Use of Existing Buildings,and Appendix F,Change of Use of Existing Buildings (otherwise referred to as Compliance Alternatives) cited in Chapter 34, Paragraph 3406.0. For brevity,the Massachusetts State Building Code,Oh Edition will be referred to as 780CMR6. The new uniform Massachusetts State Building Code, ls`Edition came out in 1975,effective July 1,1975 and therefore Cape Crossroads Condominiums was not designed and/or constructed under 780CMR. It is our contention that the existing Building 4(as are the rest of the buildings in the complex)is of a Use Group 112-Residential and of a Construction Classification of Type—5B Unprotected Wood Frame,three stories in height from grade with no basements. The repairs and rehabilitation recommended and found necessary (structural, construction, mechanical,electrical,plumbing,etc.)will comply where possible with the 780CMR6,however these repairs do not constitute or intimate a Change of Use, therefore each element will be addressed so that the newly rebuilt or repaired section can meld into the affected section in of structural integrity, roof framing, etc. aesthetically unchanged outwardly from the or profile. �,hl :I Div t �w As stated in Chapter 34,Paragraph 3400.2,all work shall conform where possible to the ��C requirements,but where compliance becomes impractical because of construction diffic i\ — "compliance alternatives"will be employed as regulated by Chapter 34 and Appendix F. the buildings were under construction prior to the 780CMR ls`Edition,all requirements ne comply,but can be no lesser than those under which these buildings were constructed origi* --- However,as required by 780CMR,separate structural,mechanical,electrical and en ti reports were commissioned by the Owner's representative independent of this at(.. c �y report. 7 Building Code Summary and Analysis Construction issues relating to the Massachusetts State Building Code, 6th Edition were addressed with regard to assisting in the repair and rehabilitation of this building back to full use and occupancy. The pertinent chapters which will govern are Chapter 34 — Repair, Alteration, Addition and Change of Use of Existing Buildings, and Appendix F, Change of Use of Existing Buildings (otherwise referred to as Compliance Alternatives) cited in Chapter 34, Paragraph 3406.0. For brevity, the Massachusetts State Building Code, 6th Edition will be referred to as 780CMR6. The new uniform Massachusetts State Building Code, 1st Edition came out in 1975, effective July 1, 1975 and therefore Cape Crossroads Condominiums was not designed and/or constructed under 780CMR. It is our contention that the existing Building 4 (as are the rest of the buildings in the complex) is of a Use Group R2-Residential and of a Construction Classification of Type— 5B Unprotected Wood Frame, three stories in height from grade with no basements. The repairs and rehabilitation recommended and found necessary (structural, construction, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, etc.) will comply where possible with the 780CMR6, however these repairs do not constitute or intimate a Change of Use, therefore each element will be addressed so that the newly rebuilt or repaired section can meld into the affected section in terms - of structural integrity, roof framing, etc. aesthetically unchanged outwardly from the original 1 profile. As stated in Chapter 34, Paragraph 3400.2, all work shall conform where possible to the above requirements, but where compliance becomes impractical because of construction difficulties, "compliance alternatives" will be employed as regulated by Chapter 34 and Appendix F. Since the buildings were under construction prior to the 780CMR I"Edition, all requirements need not comply,but can be no lesser than those under which these buildings were constructed originally. However, as required by 780CMR, separate structural, mechanical, electrical and environmental reports were commissioned by the Owner's representative independent of this architectural report. 7 k I 5 i 1 p v N a V v �j Recommended Repairs and Rehabilitation Under the current State Building Code (780CMR6), the current Use Group is R2 - Multi-Family/ Residential. However, the current Construction Classification of this building, 5B Unprotected, would only allow a building limited to 2 stories, 35' high and 4,800 gross square feet per enclosed floor per each story. The existing building is 3 stories, and estimated at 37' — 40'in height. A waiver from the local building officials would be sought to restore the building to like kind condition. To offset this, the code gives you the option of installing a partial automatic fire suppression system(sprinklers) allowing you to add 1 more story and increase the gross square footage of each floor 100% as per Chapter 5,Paragraph 504, 504.2, 506.3 and Table 503. This would only be required in that portion of the building destroyed by fire. The "compliance alternative" is to construct all interior floor - ceiling assemblies of 1-hour fire rated construction as would be all walls in the storage and laundry rooms. Since these are residential units, the ., interior walls and partitions are not required to be rated. The only rated wall would be the fire separation wall between dwelling units. Based on the architectural evaluation which outlines the existing construction of the building and some structural conditions observed,the following code issues were reviewed. Fire Separation Wall: Constructed of 8" CMU with duro-wall every second course as best as could be determined. However, this wall did not contain any vertical (rebar) reinforcement to maintain its rigidity and many rough, unfilled or firestopped penetrations were visible through the wythe of the wall (at all levels). Firestopping and draftstopping of all penetrations in walls, floor and ceiling assemblies shall be as per Chapter 7, Paragraph 720.0 inclusive. Windows: The current windows are of a slider type of sufficient clear opening to allow rescue. However, if new windows are to be installed, at least one window in each sleeping room shall be maintained as an additional means of egress as required by Chapter 10, Paragraph 1010.4 — Emergency Escape. Doors: Each unit contains one (1) entrance door, 3' wide by 6' —8"high and contained a sliding door unit in the living room area with clear opening of approximately 43" (3' — 7") wide by 73" (6' — 1")high. 780CMR6 requires doors to be a minimum of 32".in clear width and not less than 6' —6" as required by Chapter 10, Paragraph 1017.3 Recommended 3' —0" x 6' — 8" door size to remain. Exits: Each unit has only one means of egress; that of the entrance door opening into a common egress balcony and an alternate means of egress via the sliding door unit from a bedroom which also egresses into the balcony. 8 ', nit egresses to an outside egress balcony with two remote stair Egress Balconies: Each condo u gr g y towers to grade. The existing balconies have a clear width of 4' - 2" (50") and guard rails 3' -6" (42") with intermediate wood balustrades and cross rails. However, the wood cross rails do not meet current code and should be reconfigured. 780CMR6 calls for exterior corridors . (exterior balconies) to have a clear width of 3' - 0" (36") serving less than.50 persons as per Chapter 10, Paragraph 1011.5, and "shall be protected to prevent the accumulation of snow and �q ice in climates subject to those elements" per Paragraph 1011.3. These balconies should-also be`Q, separated from the-dwelling_units-with-a minimum-of a-1=hour"fire rated wall andpeningj t� protectives as per Paragraph-1011:5A —The guard rails should remain at 42 in height as per r D Paragraph 1021.0, however, the openings in the rails shall have balusters or be of solid material f such that a sphere with a diameter of 4" cannot pass through any opening per Paragraph 1021.3. n�fl In R2 / R3 Use Group, the rails should be able to withstand a concentrated load of 200 pounds om any direction as per Table 1615.5. 1. Exterior Egress Stairs: Each two condominium units egress onto the egress balcony which has a set of wooden stairs at each end, remote as possible from one another. Each stair essentially serves one unit and both stairs can serve both units. The existing stairs vary in width from 46"to 41". Exit stairways must have a minimum clear width of 44" between the handrails serving a building with an exit R2/R3 as per Chapter 10,Paragraph 1014.0. Note: Treads and Risers (Section 1014.6) in Use Group R2, the maximum riser height shall be 8 `/4" and minimum tread depth shall be 9". (A one-inch nosing shall be provided on stairways with solid risers). (Section 1014.6.1) - Profile - Exception: "Solid risers are not required for stairways serving dwelling units which are not required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with 521CMR, provided that the opening between treads does not permit the passage of a sphere t with a diameter of four inches." Handrails: The current system of handrails is difficult to use, is located in the open well side and does not conform to code requirements. These stairs will need to be reconstructed and handrails added at each side. Handrails shall be mounted not less than 1 %2" clear space from wall and shall not project more than 3 1/2" into the stairway. Height of rails minimum 34" (2' - 10") plumb over the nosing no more than 38" (3' - 2") plumb over the nosing as required per Paragraph 1022.0.0. Minimum Light and Ventilation Requirements: Chapter 12 sets forth minimal requirements for both natural and artificial light and natural and artificial ventilation for R2 Use Group. Paragraph h 1203.1 -Ceiling Heights: 7' -6" (habitable spaces other than kitchens ok with minimum 7'-0") Paragraph h 1205.0-Light and Ventilation Re orts: Bathrooms-Toilet Rooms shall have artificial light - 3 foot candles, 30" AFT. All bathrooms - toilet rooms shall maintain mechanical exhaust fans and shall vent directly to the outside. Paragraph 1206.1 -Natural Light: For all habitable and occupiable rooms shall be based on 250 foot candles, and provide an average illumination of 6 foot candles at 30" AFT. 9 i �� '�� s . �, a Paragraph 1206.2—Minimum Glazing Area. Every occupiable room shall have a glazing 1 area not less than 8%of floor area. The existing windows meet this requirement. Note: Walls, floors and ceiling assemblies separating dwelling units shall have a sound transmission class.(STC) of 45, per Paragraph 1214.1. BuildingEnvelope Requirements: Are set by 780CMR6, Chapter 13 — Energy Conservation, in particular with respect to low rise residential buildings, Appendix J is used for residential use groups, three stories or less in height. Climate Zone 12A. Appendix J Paragraph J 1.1.2.1 Group Barnstable County is classified in C ppp R Residential Buildings, "newly constructed or new portions 3 stories or less in height". � ' Referencing Paragraph J1.1.2.3, Application to Existing Buildings: "for the purposes of energy (L conservation, an existing building which has-been legally occupied and/or used for a period of at IIn least 5 years— also reference Paragraph 2.0 and Paragraph 3400.3.1. An addition (or other) can tlec l be taken (evaluated) by itself or combined with the existing. According to Paragraph 1301.5, Additions to Existing Buildings "shall be made without making the entire building comply". Therefore: In reconstructing the fire damaged portions of this building the following "R" value requirements shall meet the intent of this Chapter. ' Table J1.1.2.3 — Max. "U"Valuer Fenestration(windows) 0.39 Min. "R"Value—Ceiling—R37 (10") (however R-30 (10")may be used uncompressed) Min. "R"Value—Walls—R13 (3 V2") Min. "R"Value—Floor—RI (6 '/a") Min. "R"Value—Basement Wall—R10 (3 %") tMin. "R"Value—Slab Perimeter—R10 (3 '/2")4 feet deep In closing, in lieu of adding a partial sprinkler system, the recommended / suggested corrections should be reviewed with the building official. The key element in undertaking the repair and rehabilitation is to get approval to achieve an upgrade to a Construction Classification.of 5A — Unprotected—Table 602. In order to achieve this,we recommend the following ratings govern the reconstruction work: 1-hour rated load-bearing exterior walls 2-hour rated fire walls and party walls 1-hour rated tenant space separation 1-hour rated dwelling unit separation- 1-hour rated metal roof construction 10 i Firestopping of attic and ceiling spaces (Paragraph 714.5) 1-hour rated structural members and supporting walls 1-hour rated floor construction including beams 1-hour rated interior load-bearing walls i Also, each condominium building has a lower level laundry room, storage bin area, common 1 sitting lounge and a caretaker's residence—bedroom. 780CMR6 requires that in R2 Use Groups, storage rooms serving greater than 50 square feet but less than 100 square feet should have 1- hour rated separation walls and/or smoke partitions—as required by Table 302.1.1 and Paragraph 302.1.1.1. Because of the costs of installing a partial sprinkler system in the storage areas and/or throughout ' the building, it is suggested that the above stated upgrade be completed as outlined in accordance with Appendix F. Any and all suggested or required code upgrades should be made in consultation with the local Building Officials. 11 i j Conclusion and Recommendations Within the context of any reconstruction effort to be undertaken, we would recommend that a meeting be held prior to the preparation of construction documents with the local building commissioner to determine the exact level of code upgrade and/or compliance alternatives which will be acceptable to the building official. 1 Unless the structural evaluation suggests otherwise; it is our opinion that, clearly, the third floor demolished units be reconstructed on the existing floor frame with perhaps an additional layer of plywood subflooring be installed to stabilize and level any damaged subflooring which is remaining. The existing CMU fire separation walls appear to be sound but closer scrutiny should be paid during construction to the mortar joint conditions and corrective work undertaken to rake and repoint any damaged joints.. A new rated fire separation wall will need to be constructed from the top of the existing CMU to the underside of the new roof sheathing as required by the current building code. Consideration should be given to cutting back the floor trusses which are bearing on the CMU wall and instead constructing a framed interior bearing wall along side of but independent of the CMU. One point of caution with regard to a possible new interior bearing wall is the effect it may have on the existing plumbing waste piping and fixture location "rough- in" dimensions. Consultation with the plumbing sub-contractor will determine if this poses any ' problems with the existing under-slab piping system. Although the existing windows and doors have not been completely destroyed, we would hat new energy-efficient clad windows and sliding recommend t g doors be installed which will operate more effectively and contribute towards meeting new energy code requirements. ' In those units which were subjected to excessive water infiltration and exposure, we would recommend removing all finish materials down to the underlying structure and replacing with comparable new materials, especially as new rated assemblies may be necessary. The bathroom exhaust fans, which are venting directly into the back side of the exterior deck ledger boards, need to be modified to allow for unrestricted air flow by either cutting out a section of the ledger board or providing a louver extension through a cored hole in the ledger. We would strongly recommend that this condition be rectified at all buildings where the decks have been replaced and the exhaust fan venting is being restricted. To avoid repetition, the reconstruction work will also need to meet the requirements of the current Massachusetts State Building Code as described in detail earlier in this report. Brown Lindquist Fenuccio & Richmond Architects, Inc. is available to answer any questions related to this report. We look forward to assisting with the reconstruction of this structure and are available immediately to begin the next phase of work. 12 � `' r � � � � � � � r � � � � r � r � '"Ly ''d CrJ C7 ►-� �C I ''d x 0 y 0 b x r 7� C K -- P=- — a Try A s , :.v o yw .77 x t r„v ' View of Westerly side of building where fire originated and damage was concentrated. I III 1� ' 1'. .. •.. a _ i ��^_ _ -- .. „✓_•'"x�.S�„i r�+�,�'.��^'X.:i.,'..'r.*}4,s...uiLT:>..+'Y '�" ""'w.`tc`'k"�-e ac � 1 f 3rd View o p floor fire separation wall between units 4N—Unit `F' and 4 W—Unit `C'. Note: CMU wall terminates at the underside only of the roof truss bottom chords—typical. 16 1 z 5 ` —s- y ^ Cflrf +� }� � ?'� ` �• ,�. �i. -ten., o� �� .�a�. f [' k• f .p•t _1 1, F�` �:7 •'•f fJ .�� g'�.• +� �� ,[�, F �� i v '....a,. C�.` � � � 4�` I e ` r a View of First Floor Unit 4A showing excessive water infiltration and mold growth on floor trusses,wood studs and floor&.wall sheathing `Shift. i t I View of CMU Fire Separation Wall at 1st floor showing horizontal pipe and wire penetration. �� ► a '` i i r y OP K A Bathroom Exhaust Fan Duct venting through rim joist but restricted on the exterior by they 2 x 8 ledger board shown below r ,. 46, f rr '4F j „1y V F sae �I View of recent deck replacement with 2 x 8 ledger board which is restricting the air flow of the exhaust duct above. 1 Y t 1 i �F 1 !� E i ,t.�< r � F Existing uncovered lower portion of egress stair tower without code compliant railing ' y 0.� r t`F 1 1 Covered portion of egress stair showing open riser exposed stringer condition 1 n oo o BROWN LINDQUIST FENUCCIO & RICHMOND TEN ARCHITECTS, INC, RICHARD R FENUCCIO 1 923 MAIN STREET ROUTE 6A 40-48 NORTH MAIN STREET YARMOUTHPORT MA 02675 MIDDLEBORO MA 02346 PH 508-362-8382 PH 508-923-4616 FAX 508-362-2828 • BLFR.RICK@STARBAND.NET WWW.CAPEARCHITECTS.COM 4 BROWN LINDQUIST FENUCCIO & RICHMOND ARCHITECTSO�INC. 923 Main Street _ YARMOUTH PORT,,MA 02675 % DATE - c e`JOB NO. (508) 362-8382 , Fax: (508) 362-2828 ATTENTION i TO �ip•?�sT.%t4 4 ,U/iolw dE,OT: Gaiv«? .sw.,vrs d 1 WE ARE SENDINGtt YOU�,1� Aached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: \t ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ' , ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications I ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ i { Fri 1E i THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval XFor your use ElApproved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO t//�I `3T��® 1�Ii (rx �G SIGNED: /f enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once.