Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0790 FALMOUTH ROAD/RTE 28 (3) r- V W F r. 1 I C G� r 04/24/2009 15:49 FAX Ij002/002 04/24/2009 13: 29 5009647979 sci PAGE 01/02 n it SOUTH COAST IMPROVEMENT COMPANY THE SOURCE FOR PROPERTY SERVICES DATE: TO; �-�r t `'k ,2y l COMPANY: FAX- RE- We are sending a total of �pages including cover sheet. Tease call if,you do not receive the number of pages Indicated. The information contained In this flax Is coni�dential and intended for use by the addressed only. Ploasc notify this ofToe if you received t ie fax i c Y h n rr .r. NOTES:: e2, l \ C:1� 39 FOSTER STREET NEW REDFORD9 MA 02740 •FAX(508),984.7979 TOLL FREE(888)448-9987 V4/24/2009 15:49 FAX 001/002 /2069 13:29 5.OD9647979 _ SCI PAGE 02/02 Town of Barnstable s e , Regulatory Services , 's wwtr yscr, _ Thomas F.Geiler,Airector sa Buildixrg DIVISion Tons]Perry,Bullding Cottttnlaslnnor 200 Main Stroet,gyam:cds,MA 02601 Wwa.town.baraStabl a-ma.ue kwax: 50$'.790-6230 Office; SOB-962-4039 Property Ovrner Must Complete and Sign This Section If Y TS; g,A.Buil e e I, V���• ,as Qwcxer of the subjeet.propecty IT hereby authorize + to aet on ruy behalf, in ztters relative to work authorized by'this binding pe A rn rmit application for. 0A *��Add=sqfhf o ) *w4er Date 4, ptl+ Mat 1 2Xne if J!ro agM Owner is applY�ag for permit please complete,the Homeowners License Exemption Form on'the reverse side, Q�FOPM9:OWNbRpBRMISSION F Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: i BRIO©S A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: d Date: -2 -1& Client: a(? 7w,T Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: Mix proportions Ator4l, j eT Qs� Gyl� yC 1T ^rD epW (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard wo.LC, Amount Cement lbs. Ticket No.: I a Batch Time: 102!O�o Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: O O 0 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3 0 00 Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: : 3 O Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: 7 Load #.: Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: C.A. Size: IV Other oz. Slump: Lf, Air Content: CP s ASTM C-143 // AST -2 C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.:�j c Air Temp.: cc c ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 0 02 . g�7 Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: w� �„C.,o� producer are both responsible 90 S Concrete Source:CQ ` for added water as per ASTM Gals. 20 General Contractor; we✓ o �` 70 of grater 2 5 C-94. Discharge time limit 5 added 30 Storage Location: oA 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. 60 350ja o f 11 min. max. Curing Box: (A) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Weight: Unit Wei ht As Received: Pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested -at test in. in. (sq. in. cf LBS. Stren th PSI ASTM C-39 2. A `7.13,g1S 7 6 " 12" 28.3 143,1 77 98C Z760 I B $,646 28 6 " 12" 28.3 1-433 10% V,50 3990 C 8,1398 28 6 " 12" 28.3 43,z 105, /F(0 37ZO D C �,6-9 28 6 " 12" 28.3 /4 ion, S'�� ,3g5o IJ .Q P Approved: Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 4ILLIN PROJECT: B R I f�S Briggs Engineering & Testing �✓� , l S �•,�� A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: U. Date: � Client• • r ' 'o LI Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: Ea ; Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. Ticket No.: /05 Batch Time: 7 v7-0 Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: Qoc� Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: Water Gals. Sot No.: Time of Test: Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: Load Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: C.A. Size: 3 Other oz. Slump: Air Content: ASTM C-143 5 ASTM C-123/C-17351 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: a ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 7o;25 Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: Gcz ��Ga producer are both responsible S 101 Concrete Source: oal C•'' for added water as per ASTM S Gals• 20 General Contractor: 70 of water 25 C-94. Discharge time limit S added 36 Storage Location: 4 o 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. 65S 5 min. max. Curing Box: kA Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 Day Air Dry Unit Weigh Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specime Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test in. in. (I . in. cf LBS. Strencith PSI ASTM C-39 f A a4 6 " 12" 28.3 IV I B ItAkAq 6 " 12" 28.3 %%-16 ,0,� 103 Sy g 3 to 6 C>r Vb 6 " 12" 28.3 \�A� ,-7 gq, 'l0I 3,530 G D e6lL4 olo 6 " 1 2" 28.3 -t",\ • 0� T& 3, ?;?0 Approved: r Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: BRIOOS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: Date: Client• • r o L� Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: E c, l Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. Ticket No.: /O 5 113atch Time: 7oZ-d Fine Aggregate lbs: Strength Delivered: Doc Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: ;�s Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: Load #.: Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: CA. Size: 3 Other oz. Slump: Air Content: ASTM 0-143 5 ASTM C-123/C-1735' Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: a ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 70-24:�' d Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: producer are both responsible 5 101 Concrete Source: od C.h for added water as per ASTM 5 Gals. Z0 General Contractor: 7o of water 25 C-94. Discharge time limit 5 added 30 Storage Location: �r�o. 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. �55 35 min. max. M Curing Box: kA Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 Day Air Dry Unit Wei ht: Unit Wei ht As Received: Pcf "peumcrJ Date -Age C .., Height Ares: Density A".a^: Load: Compre- we. T .relFra�t1� Number Tested at test in. in. s . in. cf LBS. Strencith PSI ASTM C-39 AI zftdr 6 " 12" 28.3 Lk oA #1 CAM y B a a,g 6 " 12" 28.3 V-l�,"� 6 " 12" 28.3 D y a 6 " 12" 28.3 ��� • Approved: CONCRETE PLACEMENT INSPECTION �i aL B R I G G S Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT. Whitehall Estates A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 8 2 7 0 6 MPECTOR: Chad Hancock 1AR.TIME: 7 :3 0 JOB HRS.: 4-1 DATE 7-7-9 8 CODE 'EMP.: H 8 0 L 6 5 WIND: H L x HUMID.: H Lx I SUNNY x CLOUDY Concrete Source: Cape Cod Concrete General Contractor. Congress Const. Storage Location: Curing Box no Other along wall Inspection completed as per ACI-301 and Contract Documents. A checklist of major items is presented. All items in non-conformance are either corrected during inspection or noted herein. Detailed inspection of reinforcing for size, quantity, grade, spacing and configuration is reported separately when performed. v Preplacement: Weather X Steel arrangement X Temp. X Steel clearance X Forms for general requirements. X Steel cleanliness X Grade preparation X Steel supports X Placement Concrete placed within limits of ASTM C-94 and Contract Documents. Non-compliance items are either corrected before placement or noted herein. Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C-172 ASTM C-94 Limits ASTM C-94 Limits Time Limits X 1-112 hrs. max. Temperature X 50-W F Slump X 4 5• Wodng - 70-300 Rev. Air content X 3 -.6 % Density - t 3 p.c.f. Location: East wall section 3 Remarks: I informed the suAerintendetiti= ``of all results. Method of placement Chute' X Pump Other Load Arr. Truck No. of Mix Conc. Slump Air Air Conc. Conc. CA Cyl. Set Gals. Unit No. Time No. Yds. Duration Temp (in.) (°6) Temp Strength Strength Size Fabr. # add Weight (min. Derrv. Required water (ocf) 1 8 :00 59 10 85 72 5 5 .5 68 3000 3000 3 4 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8011 - 9 10 Ap proved: 11144f .ci V mpoLo, Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 �a"X Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: t.,1 ,4 G Cl BRIOOS r� / A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#-. gj7(Q&p Date: -7 Client: a6jafe, .L. Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: Mix proportions Scc- w� 3 (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. Ticket No.: f S Batch Time: Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: `3o� Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: Water Reducino oz. Truck No.: Load #.: I Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: C.A. Size: 3 Other oz. Slump: Air CoA94C-173 � ASTM C-143 ASTM ', Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: o Air Temp.:J c ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 �a b Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: C� producer are both responsible 5 10 Concrete Source: �� o for added water as per ASTM 5 Gals• 70 General Contractor: of grater 25 C-94. Discharge time limit � added 30 Stora a Location: ar o 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. 6055604 40L35 min. max. Curing Box: W I,A Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 Day Air Dry Unit Wei ht: Unit Wei ht As Received: Pcf VI I pecimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested -at test ' (i n.) 1(sq. in. cf LSS. Stren^th PSI (ASTM C-39 1 A �. - 7 6 " 12" 28.3 2) 2 B 28 6 " 12" 28.3 C - 28 6 " 12" 28.3 /, D &A 28 6 " 12" 28.3 Approved: r Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: �i✓ / BRIG©s A Division of PK Associates, Inc. 1PROJECT#: Ba7Q6 Date: -7 Client: Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: Eas,y1 �.a► Mix proportions S-cc, 'w� 3 (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. Ticket No.: 6 s Batch Time: 7.'a20 Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: "3oa� Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: Load #.: Air Entrain ing oz. Number of C I.: C.A. Size: 3 Other - oz. Slump: Air Conten ASTM C-143 ASTM - C-173 S Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: o Air Temp.: c ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 �5v Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: producer are both responsible 5 101 Concrete Source: Ca o for added water as per ASTM 5 Gals. 20 General Contractor: of water 2 5 C-94. Discharge time limit s added 30 Storage Location: q p 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. 80 35 min. max. Curing Box: WO Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 Day Air DrV Unit Weight: I Unit Wei ht As Received: Pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested -at test in. in. (a . in. cf LBS. Strength PSI ASTM C-39 1 A 7- 14- 7 6 " 1 12" 28.3 B 4,% 28 6 " 12" 28.3 W5,34 3,V70 C - 28 6 " 12" 28.3 141, 7gq70/ 3, 53 G ' D -A-1& 28 6 " 12" 28.3 141. l0�1 q 3 r20 TS COMP Approved: I CONCRETE PLACEMENT INSPECTION BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Chad Hancock ARR.TIME: 7:30 am JOBHRS.: 4.5 DATE: 7/7/98 CODE. C 2 6 TEMP.: H 80°L 650 WIND: H L X HUMID.: H L X SUNNY X CLOUDY Concrete Source: Cape Cod Concrete General Contractor. Storage Location: Curing Box: Other along east wall Inspection completed as per ACI-301 and Contract Documents. A checklist of major items is presented. All items in non-conformance are either corrected during inspection or noted herein. Detailed inspection of reinforcing for size, quantity, grade, spacing and configuration is reported separately when performed. Preplacement: Weather X Steel arrangement X Temp. X Steel clearance X Forms for general requirements. X Steel cleanliness X Grade preparation X Steel supports X Placement: Concrete placed within limits of ASTM C-94 and Contract Documents. Non-compliance items are either corrected before placement or noted herein. Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C-172 ASTM C-94 Limits ASTM C-94 Limits Time Limits X 1-1/2 hrs. max. Temperature X 50-900 F Slump X 2' - 4 ' Mixing X 70-300 Rev. Air content X 4 - 6 % Density X t 3 p.c.f. Location: East wall section 3 Remarks: I informed the superintendent of all results. Method of placement: Chute X Pump Other Load Arr. Truck No. oi Mix Conc. Slump Air Air Conc. Conc. CA Cyl. Set Gals. Unit No. Time No. Yds. Duration Temp. (in.) (%) Temp. Strength Strength Size Fabr. # added Weight min. °F 'F Deliv. Required water cf 1 8:00 59 12. 85 720 5 5.5 700 3000 3000 3 4 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 Approved- 1��_i f .......Soi Ilin flQirt ts.. . E � � I::::::.................:. BAIGGS Briggs Engineering &Testing PROJECT: Whitehall Estates A Division of PKAssociates,Inc O ,70/ PROJ#: �Oi v INSPECTOR Chad Hancock EMP#: 0918 REPORT#: DATE: 07/07/98 CODE: D2922 ARRV: 7:30 JOB HRS. 4.5 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: 65-80F WIND: Low HUMID.: Low (SUNNY) CLOUDY NO-OF-PAGES TO THIS REPORT: 1 of 3 NO.OF BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 2 Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D-698. Location: East wall of Section 3 Remarks: Arrived at the above project site as the client requested in order to conduct Soils Compaction Inspection/Testing. All tests met and or exceeded the minimum compaction requirement of 95%. Informed super of all test results. a i i i � I Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: Y&z z 1� Soils Compaction Report. ON" PROJECT: x Briggs Engineering & Testing [✓`j .� BRIOGS ti— A Division of PK Associates, Inc. 1PROJECT#.- UV& MPECPOR:C� c o EMP.#-. REPORT#: DATE: 7- 7—4 ie CODE ARR.TIME ` 3O JOB HRS.: C/ T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: . HS;;10-L 6 S WIND: H CC> HUMID.: H UN CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: Optimum Moisture Content: G Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone Nuclear Densometer TTes Location Estimated Elevation Test Result Req. Min. Moisture Optimum No. Area Tested Comp. % Comp. Content e. k4oistwe % x cc �s E 3. 57 7 0 e 9. G. Tests not meeting requirements: / Who notified: Recommendations: Remarks: / 157 _ n,.c -- 01 r_ Technician: Approved CONCRETE PLACEMENT INSPECTION ERIGGS Briggs Engineering&Testing PROJECT: Whitehall Estates PROD#: 82706 A Division of PK Associates,Inc. l INSPECTOR: Curt Hancock I ARRIV TIME: 12:30 JOB HRS.: 3 DATE: 07/ 16/ 98 CODE: C26 TEMP.: H85F WIND: H M (L) HUMID.: H (M) L SUNNY (CLOUDY) I Concrete Source: Cape Cod Ready Mix General Contractor: Lower Cape Foundation Inc. Storage Location: Curing Box: ( No Other: On top of manhole cover-next to placement Inspection completed as per ACI-301 and Contract Documents. A checklist of major items is presented. All items in non-conformance are either corrected during inspection or noted herein. Detailed inspection of reinforcing for size, quantity, grade, splicing and configuration is reported separately when performed. Preplacement: Weather OK Steel arrangement OK Temp. OK _ Steel clearance OK Forms for general requirements CK Steel cleanliness .CK Grade preparation OK Steel support OK Placement: Concrete placed within limits of ASTM C-94 and Contract Documents. Non-compliance items are either corrected before placement or noted herein. Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C-172. ASTM C-94 Limits ASTM C-94 Limits Time Limits 1-1/2 hrs. max. Temperature OK 50-90°F Slump OK 3 " to 5 " Mixing - 70-300 Rev Air Content OK 4 to 6 % Density - t 3 p.c.f. Location. North, east and west foundation walls of Wing II Remarks: `Notified super Mr. John Feeny of time limit overages on both loads. Per Mr. Feeny the batch time on the ticket was incorrect. Therefore accurate mix durations could not be determined. Mr. Feeny approved placement of these loads. Mr. Feeny ; was informed of all findings and test results. A bucket sample was taken on Load #2. Method of Placement: Chute X Pump Other Load Arr. Truck No. of Mix Conc. Slump Air Air Concrete Concrete CA Cyl Set Gals. Unit No. Time No. Yds. Duration Temp: (in.) % Temp Strength Strength Size Fabr. # added Weight min. F F Delivered Required water cf 1 12:55 57 10.5 125 mins. 82 4 1/4 5.5 85 3000 3000 3/4 4 1 10 - 2 13:15 88 1 10.5 ? mins. - - - - 3000 30 00 3/4 1buckel 2 1 10 - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 Approved: I Daily Report �`LIC\6BRIGG PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES/HYANNIS S Briggs Engineering & Testing v A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Mark Liebert EMP.#: 309 REPORT#: DATE: 7/14/98 CODE: ARR.TIME: 10:00 am JOB HRS.: 1 T.T.: 2 MILEAGE: TEMP.: H 80F WIND: N/A TMID.: H X SUNNY GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATIONS I reported to the above mentioned project site to perform; the scheduled inspection of excavated footing trenches. At the time of my inspection the trenches were excavated in the 4th wing, south, east and north walls and 5th wing at the south and east walls (Foundation Plan Right). Foundation forms have been placed in the center section at front entry. Soil was excavated beyond subsoil to uniformly graded sand with stone. The areas appeared well compacted with no trace of organic matter. Top 1-2" of sand is dry and loose. I suggest the dampening of soil just prior to placement of concrete. All observations were reported to the project superintendent prior to leaving the site. Technician: Mark Liebert Approved v a� FRICG 7 Briggs Engineering & Testing p D NilA DMsioN of PK Assom BS,INc. Z-N Jan Turner Parkside Senior Services, L.L.C. July 13, 1998 5215 Old Orchard Road Project No 82706 Suite 700 Skokie, IL 60077-1045 RE: Whitehall Estate, Whitehall Way, Hyannis, Ma Daily Geotechnical Field Report for July 6, 1998 At the request of John Feeny of Congress Construction, the undersigned Geotechnical Engineer visited the Site to observed foundation subgrade conditions. The results of the visit are discussed as follows: BUILDING AREA EXCAVATIONS The undersigned engineer witnessed the excavation of fine to coarse sand with a trace of silt and gravel from the proposed footing area along the northeast part of the proposed building area. Refer to the attached sketch for location. The excavation extended to firm stratified fine to coarse sand subgrade. The virgin subgrade sand was disturbed to a depth of approximately four inches or less by the 'excavation. The subgrade was immediately compacted by making approximately four passes using a large hand operated, self propelled vibratory plate compactor. The subgrade was firm and stable during the compaction. Approximately 12 to 18 inches thickness of subsoil was excavated from the proposed slab area in the northwest part of the building as shown on the attached sketch. The excavated subsoil consisted of a silty sand with a trace of gravel and several roots. The excavation extended to virgin, stratified sand with a trace of gravel and silt. The subgrade was observed to be free of organic matter including roots. Very truly yours, BRIGGS ENGINEERING &TESTING A Division of P Associa s,Inc i 4� vid Geisser Paul M. Skorohod Project Engineer President DWG:PMS:dg Enclosure: Site Sketch 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland,RI 02864 Phone (781)871-6040 9 Fax (781)871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990*Fax (401)658-2977 a f 3 l S CX 09 01 T? W N LOCATION PLAN PROPOSED WHITEHALL ESTATE - HYANNIS, MA NOTES LOCATIONS ARE BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING APPROXIMATE. IBRIGGSI 100 WEYMOUTH STREET, UNIT 131 `J ROCKLAND, MASSACHUSETTS DR. BY: DWG SCALE: 1"=40' +/- PROJ. NO: 82706 CK'D BY: PMS DATE: -j & FIGURE NO. 1 fv BRIGGB Briggs Engineering &Testing PROJECT: Whitehall Estates A Division of PK Assoaates,Ina PROJ# ` INSPECTOR: Chad Hancock EMPM 0918 REPORT#: DATE: 07/07/98 CODE: D2922 ARRV: 7:30 JOB HRS. 4.5 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: 65-80F WIND: Low HUMID.: Medium (SUNNY) CLOUDY NO OF PAGES TO THIS REPORT: 1 of 3 NO.OF-BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 2 Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D-698. Location: East wall, Section 3 Remarks: Arrived at the above project site as the client requested in order to conduct Soils Compaction Inspection & Concrete Placement Inspection. Four compaction tests were conducted in the areas noted on the attached report. All tests met and or exceeded the minimum compaction requirement of 95%. This area was approved for concrete placement. Concrete contractor placed 12 cubic yards of 3000 3/4" psi concrete this date for the east wall section 3 footings. One set of four 6"x12" test cylinders was fabricated and stored along the east wall. Super was informed of all findings and test results. For further details, please see the attached reports. Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: r Soils Compaction Report. ' BRI�BS Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: Z7 A Division of PK Associates, Inc. . PROJECT#: WSPECTOR: 4 ov I EMP•� l REPORT#. DATE: CODE: AAR.TIME: 7 a JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE TEMP.: . H gp L G Sv WIND: H <D HUMID.: H SUN CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density-, Optimum Moisture Content: Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone Nuclear Densometer Tesl Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum No. Area Tested %Ccm . % Comp. Content '/ Moisture % c.4, bo , ze 6 e <A6 L i r 1, s- I Tests not meeting requirements: Who notified: Recommendations: C ' Remarks: -T;:L 177, led 5:e^ eC-- © _ r' _S:L, 4S Technician: Approved !4 ' - FB-RIGGSI Briggs Engineering & Testing A DMSlON OF PK ASSOcwo,/Nc. Whitehall Estates/Hyannis Briggs 4 82706 Tested: 7-7-98 1. Sample No. Description Source M-3347 Gravelly Sand Sample A (L) 2. Sieve Analysis {ASTM C 136, and ASTM C 117} Sieve Size Results Secs. 1% Passing y Wt.} Structural ill 4" 100 3-1/2" 100 3" 100 100 2-1/2" 100 2" 100 1-1/2" 100 1" 99 3/4" 99 1/2" 97 * 50-85 3/8" 95 #4 90 * 40-75 #10 82 #20 58 #40 29 #50 21 8-28 #80 10 #100 9 #200 7.6 0-8 3. *Sample tested does not conform to the required specifications for "Structural Fill". 4. Proctor Density {four point procedure - ASTM D 1557 Method C, and ASTM D 4718} Result Maximum Dry Unit Weight(pcf) 118.1 Optimum Moisture Content (%) 6.8 Oversize Correction (%) N/A 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone (781)871-6040• Fax (781)871-7982 Phone(401)658-2990•Fax (401)658-2977 FB-RIGGSI Briggs Engineering & Testing A Division of PK Associates,Inc. rP r;7ie c t: Whitehall Estates / Hyannis Sam le No. M-3347 Date: 7/7/9 8 Sieve Analysis # 2 0 0 # 4 0 # 10 # 4 3/4 " 311 100 ............ ...... p99............j.......i....4..i..y.q.l.gq...................j....0. j..0.0.j.00.. 1....q...i..q. 1.0 ..........4......4...d...1..J.d 4dJ........•..i......1....q.4..d.4.1.00........ ...I...d. 1•.w .1.08.......... I.......I....d..1..0• 90 _ .. - - ----- ........ .. . -- -- ....... . - -- -- ...... _ _ .. :.. :......:.... ...:.. . :. ............p......P...y...i..9.9 pq0............p......j....y..i..0.0•�•00...................j... I--- -j.00........... j.......j....0...j..9•• 1.O ........ .. .......................... ....... ......... i... ..........4......4...J...I..J.d 4Jd...........4.....1....J..1•.O.d./.Od........ ...I.....$. I...644.88.......... I.......I....d...•..w 80 ............. _....................:....- -- _- ..... - -- __ ...... _ _ - ..... .:.. '.:.''.. ...•..:....'. i.. •.•:... .. .. ............P.....p...y...i..9.9 P99...........y......p...0..i..q.0.j.00......... ........j....... i••9•gY•pq.......... j.......j.............•1•P ..........4......M•..J•..1..d.d............./......I....J..I..d.d.1.0 d..... ...I....J. I..O.d.1.66.......... 1.......1....0...1 70 ....... .......POp............1.......j....0..j..0.0./.d0.. ... j....0. j..0.0.1.00.......... 1.......I....d..q..•.� :.' ..... ...... .. 1•P ........ ....f.....j...f..j.:f S.^q............j.......j.....j..j...j..j.j..j' ...... ....j....q. j..q.q.�.gif......... j.......j....?..y..w•. 1.4 r M� 60 .......... :....4...=...:..-.J-A...............................-.-.LL •::::::: :••1....-. L.L.=.i.ii......:•• ...... • 1.4 \/ ............ i•e0..........::�.....::�::::0::�::0:01..q.q.l.gq.......... 1.......I....q • I.a 'Zr ..............::i:::7:::.:. r: ..................::i :: ::::::::::::: :.::�::: :::::::: :::: :�. 50 ..........=...,.4...=.....--__- .........i......I....d..1..=. i.SJ........... ....1....-. I..L.L.7.-L.......... I.......I....S...i..=.'1.= I/1 ............p......P...y...1..-0.O 40d............/.......p...q..1..-0 .4 44...................I....p. j..p.y.j.g0.......... j.......j....4... j..q•• I.p /vd� ..........5.......j....t..:..w.y S.ww............j.......j....:1..j..•w.i.ww..................j....w. j...'r.w.j.ww......... j.......j....w...j..w. Ir.1 40 ::::::::..=......=..-...-..�•�4��•• ..i......1....J..i.. .J.4==............ ...L...-. 1..=.-.i.ii........•• 1.......1....-...1.-.• 1.- ......... ............499...................1....q..1 -0.OY•P-0...................1....q. 1••O.dY•Pp.......... 1.......I....p...j..0.' �o ..........5.......�.....j...t...j.y S..j.:............j.......:•.....j.•...j.t.�.:.j.................j....:t. j..n..j.j.;..j..........•j....... j.....j...j...j. ;..;.;...; .. ... :....�. .. .. .. ........... .....t. :.� .. ...... . . . ... . . . : . ........ ........................ ............/.......1.....1...1..-0.91•d-0............j.......1.... .i....4.i.44...................I....0. 1..p.q.l.pq...........1.......i....4...j..q. W. ................... L.Z.:.ZZ ............ ..........5.......i.....j...j..-- - .......•..j......j. ..j..j.._..j.t..jw........ ...j...q. j..w.w.j.ww...........j....... j....:r...j..w. Vr: ....... .... 20 j......t...y...i..q 4" .........I..• j..j..j.:j.j.jn............ ...�.... . j..w w.t.w ...........j.......j...y'...j.�.' f•s ............i•......4...1...I..d.d 4Ji............1.... 1....J..1..-0.L./.dd...................1....d. 1••O•d•1.0 d...........I.......I....d.../..d.' 1.6 ..................._..._....... _-_............... ................�.:.��...................:....�. :..�.�..._�.......... :................:..�. ............j......:j....0...j..9.9...............j .....j.....1..j..0.0.j.00...................j....0. j..0.0.j.00...........j.......j....0...j..0.- 10 ::::::::::t:::::i:::j:::i::- t l�:::::: j.......i....4.4...:.j:�:-.q............:::: :_:f.w-::::::::::: :::::: ............4......4...d...1..J. .'....I.......I....d../..J.J.I.dd...................1....d. 1..d.dd•dd..........•I.......I....d...l..d• 1.4 . ............_......_...-......-•-•_-.........................�.:.. .�.:.��...................:...._'. ..._._...__...................:........:..�. ............;.......j.....j...j...j•.1.9.............j.......j.....j j...j..j.j..j0...................j....0. j..q•OyOq...........j.......j....0...j..4••/•P 0 ........ .. _ --__- ....... ....... _ __ _ ...... - - - SILT FINE MEDIUM CRS RNE COARSE SAND GRAVEL 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 SIEVE, mm BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing A Division of PK Associates,Inc. rPro7iect: Whitehall Estates / Hyannis Sam le no. M-3347 Date: 7/7/9 8. Proctor 119 118 Max. Dry Density 3 117 118.1 pcf 116 Optimum Moisture 11s 6.8 % 114 Over Size Correction 113 N/A 112 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 _ 10 11 12 Moisture Briggs Engineering & Testing A DIVIS1oN OF PK ASSOCIATES,INC. Whitehall Estates /Hyannis Briggs 4 82706 Tested: 7-7-98 1. Sample No. Description Source M-3348 Sandy Gravel Sample B (R) 2. Sieve Analysis {ASTM C 136, and ASTM C 1171 Sieve Size Results Secs. {% Passing y Wt.1 Structural-Fill 4" 100 3-1/2" 100 3" 100 100 2-1/2" 100 2" 100 1-1/2" 100 1" 90 3/4" 85 1/2" 76 50-85 3/8" 69 #4 44 40-75 #10 38 #20 22 #40 8 #50 6 * 8-28 #80 2 #100 2 #200 1.4 0-8 3. *Sample tested does not conform to the required specifications for "Structural Fill". 4. Proctor Density {four point procedure - ASTM D 1557 Method C, and ASTM D 47181 Result Maximum Dry Unit Weight (pcf) 133.8 Optimum Moisture Content (%) 5.0 Oversize Correction (%) 15 100 Weymouth Street -Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone(781) 871-6040• Fax (781) 871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990•Fax (401)658-2977 � J f—BRIGGSI Briggs Engineering & Testing A Division of PK Associates,Inc. rPr;7iect: Whitehall Estates / Hyannis Sam le No. M-3348 Date: 7/6/9 8 Sieve Analysis # 2 0 0 # 4 0 # 1 0 # 4 3/4 " 3 " 100 ...... p44............1......•1...•y•.1..yy/•4q..................•.....q. I..q.q./.40.......... I.......I. .y...I..q. I.p ..........0......O...d...1..d.d e0e............1.......1....J..1..d.d./.dd..................1....d. 1..8.8.1.00.......... 1.... I....e...l..d.' 1.6 90 ........ _ .. - - ----- ....... .. - -- -- ....... . -- -- ...... - - - ............j.......i...y...j..y.4 py4............1.......p..•4..1...;44-gq...................i....q. i..0.y.j.gq.......... j. ..j....9...i..9• 1•P :::::.::::j::::::I :::i::d:1 j 1a:::.::..:::i::: ::i::::j::j::S:it.tt...::: ....... .... . — 80 ........ _ .. - - ----- ........ - -- -- ....... ::i- e:1:j j.. I:...... ::; ...... •...•......•. .. ...... ............ ... .. ... :.... . :.. .:. ... :... ..:.... ...:..;. :....... ............p......p...y......4.4 044.........................y..1..9•p•1•gq...................1.....j. ...q.q.1.4O.... . ;............q...j..9• /•4 . .......... .....F4..y.•J.9 I•d ...........1......I....4.I..J.d di......... ....I.... . . .1�. ..... ....... 1-4-.6 ......1.....4...._0w-.... .6'.•11f.•.470 .. .. ..._......_._ ................ .. ............. ......... ...._... ............ ................... ................... .......... .......1.rp .......................... . d .........j....... w .........:::I w .......... ....... ::.: = = = � :::::::: : = = . i = d 60 . ...... ............i•......F ...........•I.......j 0.9.1•40............. ...I....a. 1.4. .4-00.......... I...........9... _4p= 1.4.1 1.e. z ............r......:.....:.........:.�..........................�..:..�.L.:._-............ :....�. :..- :.��.......... :.......:....�...:..�. :.� ..........I.......;....4...I..4.4 p4w............I........I....4..I...i-44-44...................i..... i..- ;..i.;u........... I.......j....w...I..w.. i-;. 50 ............................................................. ....... _ ..............4-4- i��--..........i.......i....=..1..-.-.1.-5.............•.......-. 1.. =.i.�r...... ..................................................................................1........................................ 1....-...t..-.• 7•- . .. ... .. ............1.............../..q.q p00....................1.....1..1..d•OY•d0..................•;...•q• 1 O.O.1.00.......... 1.......1....0...1•.q.• 1.4 �,i /Q .........;.......I.....j...;...j..j;..jw............:.......:.....:..j..w.».;.n.j..................;.....:� w.;.;.;...........;.......j...w...;..;... Pt C 40 ........ ....i.......i..='====":::::::..i...:..1....e..i..I 1 1.==............ -. 1 =:=.i.== :::::...1.......1....=...1..=.• H. :... ..:.... ...:...• .. ............p......1.....l.../..d.a<.00..........................I.......4................ ..........4. I..d.0.1.00.......... 1.......1....0........ S ........ ....I..... I...2.1 tit............I.......I.....1..;...j..j444.......• ....;...�. j..w.;..I.ww...........j.......j....4...;... ;.I. 30 :::::::: =::.•..=...e...i" d== ..........i..:..i....d..1..=.=.i.=d. .. ....1....=. I..e.=.i.e=..........i.......1....=...{..=.• i.i :...............:...•. . . ............1......i....a.../..d.a POa..................•1....•I..I..q.q.l.gq. ...............1....0. I..a.O.I.d9.......... I.......I....O...I..q. 1.4 . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .......-..I..... ..y...I.. .j 1•'j ..........�.....j....j.y. w.I. ....... ....;.. j. w.;.w ...... . ......j.....j...j.;..' f•4 20 ;......I...;...;.. _;; ..........:......:...;..;.;.; •q j............. ....;....i. ;.�.;.;. ...........;.......;....;...;.. . ;.T ............0......F...d•..1..-0.d Fdd............1.......1....d..I..d. .I.dd...................1....d. I..d.d./.00...........I.......I....e...l..d.' 1.6 . . ... . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .. ..........p......I.....j.......................•.......•........F- •q•1•II............. ........... j.q.q.I.pp..........I.......;....-0...j..4•• 1.4 lO ; ..y..;.7._'4 ..........j......j...q ..y.w.;.w ....... j. ;.. _.;._ ...... .:.....:. .. y.. �.�.. ...... ..y. _. ..... .. ...y. w. ............0......O...e.../..d.a eee............1.......1.... .1..d.d.FOd..................•I....e• 1..6.8./.08...........I.......I....e...1..6. 1.0 ............-......-..._......_•___-.................... ._....._._...__........................-. ..._.......................... ....._......_. ..- ............j.......I.....j.../..4.9 p49............1. .1....•j..j..:i.9.1•.j.1...................j....:�. j..q.q.1.49'...........j.......j....i1...;..4.' 1.4 0 . _ - -- __ ....... SILT FINE I MEDIUM CRS FINE COARSE SAND GRAVEL 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 SIEVE, mm BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing N42Vw A Division of PK Associates,Inc. rProiect: Whitehall Estates 1 Hyannis Sam le no. M-3348 Date: 7/6/9 8 Proctor 134 133 Max. Dry Density 3 133.8 pcf w a 132 Optimum L. Moisture 131 5.0 % Over Size 130 Correction 15 % 129 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Moisture % i � U [B:RIGGSI Briggs Engineering & Testing A Dmsm of PK Assocm ES,/Nc. Jan Turner Parkside Senior Services, L.L.C. July 24, 1998 5215 Old Orchard Road Project No 82706 Suite 700 Skokie, IL 60077-1045 RE: Whitehall Estate, Whitehall Way, Hyannis, Ma Daily Geotechnical Field Report for July 21, 1998 At the request of John Feeny of Congress Construction, the undersigned Geotechnical Engineer visited the above site. to observe the foundation subgrade conditions and perform compaction testing of backfill. The results of the visit are discussed below: BUILDING AREA EXCAVATIONS The undersigned engineer observed the previously excavated footing trench along the east and south walls of the proposed building. The excavations extended to firm stratified fine to coarse sand with a trace of silt. Refer to the attached sketch for location. BACKFILLING AND COMPACTION An initial lift of gravelly sand was placed prior to the site visit. The fill was consistent with the soil sample collected by the contractor from the right (south) side of the site. The lift extended approximately eight inches above the footing grade. The fill was compacted by making approximately five passes by a large vibratory plate compactor during the site visit. The fill was firm and stable during compaction. Tests #1 and #2 revealed adequate compaction in excess of the required 95% minimum. A second lift of the gravelly sand was spread over the initial lift and similarly compacted. These results meet the required minimum of 95% compaction. Tests #3, 4 and #5 revealed low moisture and inadequate compaction. The area was further compacted however, the percent compaction did not increase. Briggs recommended wetting the soil and further compacting until the required 95% compaction rate is achieved. The Contractor is scheduling the connection to municipal water and plans to wet the area after water is available. The Contractor stated that they would contact Briggs for future testing of the fill layer once water is available. Refer to the following table for soil density testing results: 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone(781)871-6040 9 Fax(781)871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990 9 Fax(401)658-2977 t Excel Corp. Whitehall Estates, Hyannis, MA Project No. 82706 July 24, 1998 Page 2 of 2 Test Percent Percent Max. Dry Optimum No. Compaction Moisture Density (pcf) Moisture 1 97 5.0 133.8 5.0 2 96 4.7 133.8 5.0 3 92 3.6 133.8 5.0 4 92 3.5 133.8 5.0 5 93 3.1 133.8 5.0 Prior to this inspection, two soil samples of site material had been collected by others and submitted to Briggs as proposed Structural Fill for the project. The fill was delivered to our laboratory and labeled as being sampled from the left (north) and right (south) sides of the site. These samples were submitted for sieve analysis and Proctor (maximum dry density) testing. The test data was submitted under separate cover after testing was complete. The above max. dry density value represents the material sampled from the right (south) side of the site. It should be noted that this material did meet the project sieve specification for structural fill. Very truly yours, BRIGGS ENGINEERING &TESTING n A Division of PKAssociates,Inc. /1 J David Geisser Paul M. Skorohod Project Engineer President DWG:PMS:dg Enclosure: Site Sketch 2 6 K 4F[tc- P�AMp ��A-� SIFT 1S 0 1, >�Z �2t� �XcAvf�Z�i: C07V1/I�lan� 1�!J/ll�t • 7".� �l l�L C���J V!S [ T ea.,p,�GrF-z. (0-V � y. N LOCATION PLAN PROPOSED WHITEHALL ESTATE - HYANNIS, MA NOTES LOCATIONS ARE BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING APPROXIMATE. IBRIGGS 100 WEYMOUTH STREET, UNIT B1 `J ROCKLAND, MASSACHUSETTS DR. BY: DWG SCALE: 1"=40' +/- PROJ. NO: 82706 CK'D BY: PMS DATE: 7-Z _9 o FIGURE NO. 1 a i 1-617-871-7982 13RIGGS ENGINEERING B76 P01 JUL 2919E 11 : 24 BR I GGS ENGINEERING P TESTING A Division of PK Associates, Inc. 1.00 WEYMOUTH STREET • ROCKLAND -MASSACHUSETTS *.USA • 02370 =�? (781) 871-6040 (781) 871-7982 Date: Total # of pages _, 2 including cover sheet: To: Recipient Fax: 06Y 7) 8a 70 *The information contained in this cover sheet and transmitted together with this cover sheet is intended only for the person, persons or entity named hereon. If you have received this documentation in error please contact our office immediately and return the original transmission to our office address by US 1Vlail. we will compensate you for telephone and/or postage expenses. 'Thank you. *In the event that this transmission is incomplete or illegible, please advise immediately. Fax•Fax•Fax*Fax*Fax•Fax•Fax*FaxoFax*Fa x•Fax Fmd�$r�TM,d.t 99¢TIMeMru W np9ly. t 1-617-B71-79B2 BRIGGS ENGINEERING B76 P02 JUL 29' 9B 11 : 24 BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing -�� A DMsroN OF PK ASSOCLA7W [NC. July 29, 1998 Briggs# 82592 Parkside Senior Services, L.L.C. 5215 Old Orchard Road/Suite 700 Skokie, IL 60077-1045 Attu: Ms.Jazz Turner RE: Analysis of Soil samples for proposed use at the Whitehall Estates / Hyannis Ms.Turner: Laboratory analysis of your samples has been conducted and the results are as follows,please see enclosed 1f you have any questions,please feel free to call me at your convenience. Very truly yours, ' BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING A Division of PKAss iates, Inc. Sty Az Mark Liebert Materials Laboratory Supervisor Construction Technology Division Enclosures: 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 1.00 found Road Rockland,MA 02370 Cumberland,RI 02864 Phone(781)871-6040•Fax(781)871-7982 Phone(401)658-2990 9 Fax(401)658-2977 1—G17-871-79B2 BRIGGS ENGINEERING 87G P03 JUL 29198 11 : 25 [—BRIG GS Briggs Engineering & Testing 4 A Dmsrory of P%Assocur$s,INc. ZEN Whitehall Estates Briggs W 82706 Tested: 7-29-98 1, Sample No. Description Source M-3437 Gravelly Sand Rte. Bourne Scenic Pit (Green Bucket) 2. Sieve Analysis {ASTM C 136, and ASTM C 117) I Sieve Size Results Specs. {% Passing by Wt.} Structural Fill 4" 100 3" 100 100 2-112" 100 2" 100 95 1" 87 3/4" 83 1/2" 73 50-85 3/8" 63 #4 59 40-75 #8 53 #16 46 #30 30 #50 11 8-28 #100 7 #200 5.3 0-8 3. Sample tested conforms to the required specifications for "Structural Fill". 100 Weymouth.Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland,MA 02370 Cumberland,RI 02864 Phone(781)871-6040*Fax (781)871-7982 Phone(401)658-2990•Fax(401)658-2977 f 1-617-871-7982 BRIGGS ENGINEERING 976 PO4 JUL 29198 11 : 25 J BRI��t3--G Briggs Engineering &Testing A Division of PK Associates,Inc. rP r;17e c t: Whitehall Estates Sample no. M-3437 Date: 7/29/98 Sieve Analysis 100 #200 #50 _. #8 #4 3/4" 31' ::i::.:e::::d: i-:i::�( ::.......::i: :i::_::�:T:t; .......:. ..........3.. .d..ud.u1...1.•1 J.bd.. ...�.. .~.:'1' _ ... .. ..d..L.d.l. .1 90 _ Y• ...j.. .:K.::.j::a::1: .j:"" .�... :::: ::: ..p.4.P�.�............. .........y_...:._q.....j,...l«:I..(.f.pp:•.:.......i_...:. -.•1•...)..•3..,•O.I.I.............r.. ...1.....1... ..0. .O ... .. 9 y •uu••.••.u. •.•. .............I.......e....e...l...l.•1.1.66........._._.1...... .,...,..,.4.1.(.............-0.. ...{..•..In. ..4•I.a3.1.•..•....... • ....I...p.M..p.l. q .............t.......d....-0...1.•.1..1 J.00.............1....... ...-t:_.7_.y-.t: -:•3.............�.. 1 1�I��Jyrj�ti, ........-........_......._............_.........._._.y..II,'....................«....q.....T......�1...-�.•.•.�.h.,....�..pp•.•,....-:....:..:........•.....:•..u............-... ........: ..... yf,......�.........�,....•...•...,.. ...:......Q -'•--.......7 :.....i4...........•..�11I........q..y7/1.......71),...oq�...(,1l...{,(11.....::..:..........................q�dy'........ .u...{11•._.:....::....: ........... : :..Gi............w� ........... ........::. u....`+,l7........ .:..•.....w..dpt4qppS.. ............{.......+----4--'f F 70 ........ ............. ........... -..:..•:....�...:...........n .. .... .. '.......¢pgpadppG•eyy.•y ,7'....•...I:j,11.:.:....:...:....::.�...•......u......:.. :.. ... .:..:... ..:�.y;.Jj11..:._......:....._:....Jq.i.I})5.I.......u..._-.....qdqr4aZ-......y....•Nf+ybtpl'•..-..:.....b�p(4�r:.ab,..-• .:.............^ .... ...................... ...............6O ! {.---4_..4..{ '1 -y_ ,._4.. p..•..•.•.. iri1{:jr - 1. pY ... ia...jI = ... = .........__. «::50 ....... 0 .............j...... .. I ..1...B.I-0. .1 ........... 1 . _. :..... ....u.....u.u. ..uu..................... __ .=I...:r�.5.. ...:7.. ...�.•...j••• •.p.q.p.j.j..........•.. . ....l u..q.u�..u.�.0 w VI ..j.......q....q...j...j..j .............j....... �..�. - Y• qq ...(.....(... ..p.q.py... .' ...,.....I...p..j..p.j. .j ry1y. 0 - ...{.......p....p...{...,..{•1•pq..................... • ..o.o.oy.l..: }} ..,..p..t••P•p y ♦Y .........I.......V....q..Y.••1..1 r•Pe.•..•..•.•..•1....._ _._p.../...I..l.a. ...�•....• .•.4....-0.••e.•y.e•M -0 ......... ....... .... ............ t......e ..s...t...1..1.1.aa.............1..... .. a...1.n 7 ............$:: :::1:�::�:-- -�: :$1.1----- --- - p., :......._ ...... .. 1...1.3 .r.a... . ...a.. ...1._.a... w..i....Tt...f..j..�•a }... a.t.•.. .. a.7.L............a.. ...7.«..I.0 S t.l.._......... pp 0 30 '--.... .... 7•p�..................... .:�;...:._ ,.,.................:.. . :....:.. ': :::... ...... - :.:..... .... _ .�... ,....... ..wp...,. .,.y.j.p............p.. .::j....J:. ::�.44+1............. . 3.....;...._;•�.« .. .....{.......q....4...j...j..,•j•4�.............7....._ .._/-... .. p............I.. ...{.w..{... ..p.ypy.l............. ...4:...y...p.4.a.[. 1 ..........I.......e....e.../.....•1./•oe............./..»... `` ..I o............... .........1... ..o.o.o.l.l............. ...r..... .........1......a....b...l...l.. .I.ab... .....1.. �2: _I-a-..t•.... .. /...s.... .1. { ..1.. :.1d.. .�j•• ..;. .1..y.a. .:. ._._.�• _ ••!._.t._ ..................... ...I.....I...a..i.6.i. -0 20 :::l:: ::T»{ :.. . •3— :..d.....d.j.L............d.. .1. ..3.. .a.a.%S.i........ .......... . ..... .. ... ....... 1.L3...._......_ ... .......:.......�......... .__ _.....�..�.Yj.._...t............... i ........3 ..�:...::47.:_.(�_.•�{..: ..ct.. - .. _:.1.:-. ::a-.. ...1....1.. ..d.a.r..l.l : :...........•. q .4.....j.. jpQ......... /.......- 3....4.44.. j :'F::10 ............ t a - " ............... ............ ........... f: : •.::�.: ::j....... :....... .. _ ........ _ .. . i ........ ..0 -—— - SILT FINE MEDIUM FINE 00/1f. 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 Sieve Size (mm) 1 1-617-871-7982 BRIGGS ENGINEERING 876 P05 JUL 29' 98 11 : 26 FB—RIGGN Briggs Engineering & Testing NI A DM90N of P%ASSOClA7'Es,Ixc. �-- Whitehall Estates Briggs 4 82706 Tested: 7-29-98 1. Sample No. Description. Source M-3438 Gravelly Sand Rte. Bourne Scenic Pit (White Bucket) 2. Sieve Analysis (,A,STM C 136, and ASTM C 1171 Sieve Size Results Specs. {%Passing by Wt.1 Structural Fill 4" 100 3" 100 100 2-1/2" 100 2" 100 97 1" 94 3/4" 90 1/21, 78 50-85 3/8" 72 #4 63 40-75 #8 57 #16 49 #30 37 #50 12 8-28 #100 8 #200 5.4 0-8 3. Sample tested conforms to the required specifications for"Structural kill". 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland,MA 02370 Cumberland,RI 02864 Phone(781)871-6040+Fax(781)871-7982 Phone(401)658-2990 9 Fax(401)658-2977 f 1-617-871-7982 BRIGGS ENGINEERING 876 P06 JUL 29198 11 : 26 FB—RIGGSI Briggs Engineering & Testing NWA Division of PKAssociates,Inc. rp_r 1 e c t: Whitehall Estates �am �en�_ ��M 3438 ���Dte: 7/29�98 Sieve Analysis 100 b #200 #50 #8 #4 3/411 31, ............i.......qq....qq..{•..1•,{.I,p 1....... ....0.....••ff..I.q.l.p..................... ......... 9•. ...1.....1... ..O.O.a•1•I.......u. 4 .............1.......a....a...1..•1.•1.I.pi,.............i....... ....i....l..,l..l.e1.1...-.........q.. ...1.....1... ..b.b.b.l.l......... .. �... ...j..-p..{..b.l. '1 ...1....•..b....a...{...1..1.I.p,,..._._......1..,.... ...{....1...;..1.0•I...-...—._. _ .................... •.... .:..:.:.�L.............1....... ...1.-..I... ..i..� T •••.•r.�-_ .. ... . •..d•..L..b.6 ....y'....•..q,...q•..;...;..: '�::..:................ ......... ....•....• -.y-. ...y.....:...5..:.•F q...l...{..1:�:py.. y., u.{t..q..•: i....p ..q.. ..}.....}.. Y9_d ,1 j...p..}.r.}. .} .... ._{.. •..�'::..e...l.ul..l•,.e4• f•:.y...}::3:p•I •T• / _- ..0 d -— .::j....y...e.-. 'l b ..1..a..1•e.l ...,...:..4.. ..1_...1 _4 .y.....1...4..{_p:s. :� 0 p �.....}-..1...1..1 .6 ...1.....:: ..i_._I...i.-0.5.1 ....a.. ..1.....1... y-3- - :..1...../•..c'.•1..1..- 'j .ul..0 ..1..0.l.bb.............1.. _ .....f.J.d.1.t............. •.1.....1... ..L .u1...., �1 .•,.....•..•.!•.•....d....• . . ..:.:...............:......• ........ -�.�-�.:.:. ¢.. ...i.....1... . `.,.�.�.�. 60 -..y'.•..q...;",;.' _ ..`....}..:yr.qF.-:.0 ...u... :.. ..�'..Y'P•i.;.....•.•..... .�:.... ..L.l..l. 6 _.;.. ..e....s. ..I..j.}.py............ j� :: :::�..•1.I.z.;.; . yu ,._ ..s.?e.l. 1'1 N ..._...... ... ..... ... F............ ::::::...........�. v .............1...._.y.._a...s...l..e./.ae........... / .e.l•a............ ...,.1... _.r4*1:":::::::::::: 1...... ...q..j C .:j.......8....q...F..l.{-1-r4.............1....... ...�....I..q.,1.p.{_{._......... ...1....•1... ..o. ...1 -•r•1 { 50 .........I............a........ .I.aO..._..._._• ..... b .. r ..i....a...:..t.t... - C _ .. :i:: �:::�::�:; �......... .i.... ... : ::�::}.4:;'' .........r.. . CO 40A ...1,......o....p ...{..{q./.q.............I::::::: ...a...1..qq..t. .{.p._._._...$:. .........1••. ...I.......b....B:::I...1..1•Iwo.............t-...... :...a...l..b a./.1........_...y.. ...1....... �.{::::::::::::: ...{..^.�:::p../.•a•1. �.,. ........... a-..1...1 .__ ........ '• - ..,..... + ..0.8.4 ... •1.....1.-- h.a.l. ..1.. ^1 b.bo. .1... _t-...1- .b.t.L...........w.. ..1.....1..: L............ :.b.....1...�.:l..hl. .i .. ...1....... s ...1.. ..1....1.. ... ....... ..I...b..a.4.:• .............:.......s....�...�. .. _ . . .............j.... ....p....q...I...1.4 y.__-1....,.... _.T.•.... ....{... ...}..}.�:.}.-...........y.. ...{.....{... ..q..}.04 1............. .^_.-..t.... ...q..p.p.{. .1 ..q...{...{..{.t.F4.......... ....{.. 1..q..1.q.{.{.........._.y._ _„1,._. 1... .. q 4•p•{.1............. .........._,r,. , ...............•..•. ....a...l•..1.•1.Ma ....._.......1,...,.. ...4. b..b..l.pq............ �.. ...1.....1... ..P.O.a.l.l............. ....... F O'1• 1 ..1 4e t1-....I...b..a.a.1. A . .............1•......b....b...1...1:.1.I.L b...-_.._..1....... .... ..1...>..I.b.l.l,............a.. ...1.....1... ..b.b.aa.l•............ ....1-._..}...{...1..4.{. .1 _.- .. -S . . ..... .. .^..-.-.S.i.. -s.. ......... ...�.....-.. ............. ....... .............j.....uq....�...;_.-1••1•1..........•.....j..u... .::5....;...t..,,.r.l•r....,.......q.. .,.}.....j.•. ..q.q.r ...._._....- :...;........ .P. ..a....0...1 .{.}.ad. ..1. ••e.••1 •-1•f•{•r.. ..a. ..1,...1.. ..a.e.6.. .y..b..}. " ............ ... _. .......... ... .. .. ..1.1,.• • • .u•••.. 1 .1......._._.. yy .................... .I.es............ -...a...l.. ..I.e.l.l........-.. 1............ .......I.....��s:.i::p.j: q AO .............t•....-.s.... h. 1.1.6a... .... b-0 b 1 1............• - .-{:._�.:. ..p'a A'1'1 .....•li..._a- �... 1.. �....p, J....a...t..t ......•.••...t•......:....�.,-:-..•. ,........ ...1..... .. ...s..:1s.:•e .�................. SILT FINE MEDIUM QRS FINE MARSE 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 Sieve Size (min) r -* "a FRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing A Dmsm of PK Assocmm,INc. Memo/Fax Cover Sheet Date: 27 July 1998 To: Ms. Jan Turner Parkside Senior Services, LLC. RE: Whitehall Estates, Hyannis Fax#: (847) 965-0000 From: Ken Oliver This document contains 7 page(s), including cover page. Memo:Jan, Attached please find the revised sieve &proctor data from the two samples of site material provided to us. The specification requirements for structural fill are now shown on the data sheets. You should note that Sample M-3347 was described to us as being sampled from the left or north side of the site. Sample M-3348 was described to us as being sampled from the right or south side of the site. The sampling was performed by others. As discussed on the telephone, Sample M-3348 falls short of meeting the specification requirements for structural fill by 2% on the No. 50 sieve screen. In light of this, we must retract the last statement in our letter to you dated July 24, 1998 which stated the material did meet the spec. While we feel the material is still suitable, Gary Kane has indicated he would be more comfortable having his Geotechnical Engineer review the attached data to determine if it should be used as structural fill. Please call if you have any questions or concerns Very truly yours, BRIGGS E,NGGIINEERING & TESTING Kenneth M. Oliver Vice President cc: Gary Kane @ The Architectural Team,via fax (617) 884-4329 David W. Johnston @ Veitas & Veitas Engineers, via fax (781) 849-2065 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone(781)871-6040•Fax (781)871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990 9 Fax (401)658-2977 t ffiRIGGS1 Briggs Engineering & Testing A DMSION OF PK ASSOCIATES,/Nc. July 8, 1998 Briggs# 82706 Parkside Senior Services, L.L.C. 5215 Old Orchard Road/Suite 700 Skokie, IL 60077-1045 Attn: Ms. Jan Turner RE: Analysis of Soil samples for proposed use at the Whitehall Estates / Hyannis Ms. Turner : Laboratory analysis of your samples has been conducted and the results are as follows, please see enclosed If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at your convenience. Very truly yours, BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING A Division of PK As, ciates, Inc. Mark Liebert Materials Laboratory Supervisor Construction Technology Division Enclosures: 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone (781) 871-6040• Fax (781)871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990•Fax (401)658-2977 ®` Ok GRIGG:S] Briggs Engineering & Testing A Dmsm of PK Assocmm,INC. Whitehall Estates/Hyannis Briggs 4 82706 Tested: 7-7-98 1. Sample No. Description Source M-3347 Gravelly Sand Sample A (L) 2. Sieve Analysis {ASTM C 136, and ASTM C 1171 Sieve Size Results _Specs. {% Passing Gy Wt.) Structure ill 4" 100 3-1/2" 100 3" 100 100 2-1/2" 100 2" 100 1-1/2" 100 1" 99 3/4" 99 1/2" 97 * 50-85 3/8" 95 #4 90 * 40-75 #10 82 #20 58 #40 29 #50 21 8-28 #80 10 #100 9 #200 7.6 0-8 3. *Sample tested does not conform to the required specifications for "Structural Fill". 4. Proctor Density {four point procedure - ASTM D 1557 Method C, and ASTM D 47181 Result Maximum Dry Unit Weight(pcf) 118.1 Optimum Moisture Content (%) 6.8 Oversize Correction (%) N/A 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone (781)871-6040•Fax (781)871-7982 Phone(401)658-2990 9 Fax (401)658-2977 ` K 1BRIGGS1 Briggs Engineering & Testing NZfA Division of PK Associates,Inc. rProiect: Whitehall Estates / Hyannis ,-,,-Sample No. M-3347 Date: 7/7/9 8 Sieve Analysis # 2 0 0 # 4 0 # 1 0 # 4 3/4 " 311 100 ............1•......p....l...p.y.q pqd............p......1....4..I..q.q.I.gq...................1....q. I••d•d•/•dp.. ... .......q 1•p .........L......L...J...1•.d.d LJd.........../......L..•J..1•.d.O.1.Od-....... ....I....J. 1•. ^.1.86.............. I.......I....J...1..0.• 1.6 .. 90 j......i...O... pg0............j.......j....0.. .O.O.j.00.................j... . I...;44;......... j.......j....0...j..e• 1.O ..........i•......4...0...1..J.d 4•YO.........•..4.....I....p..1..O.O.i.00........ ....I....J. I..d.S.1.e6......... I.......I....O...j..O. 1.6 80 ........ ...... P90............j.......I.....I..j...t4q gp......... ........j....0. j..0.0.j............. j.......j....0...j..e•• 1•P ..........L••••.•L•..d•••1.•J•d LdJ............1.......I....J••1.O•d•Ldd• ••I...J. 1••d•d•1.68......•••• I....... I....d...l••d• 1•e 70 ............1.......p...j...j..O•d 4eO............j.......j.....j..j..O.d.1.00.. .... ...j....0. j..0•e.4ee.......... j.......j...0...1.•d. 1•a ..........j.......j....y...j....:y i•?0...........j......j....j..j..w.0.j.w ...... ....j...0. j.. w.j.w ...... j.......j....0...j..q.•j.0 rZ 60 .............L.....L...=...i..=.=LSs............. ::..l.:.d..1..�.=.3. _ ::::::: :: I.:..a. /..S:=.I.Ss :::::: 1.......1....=...1 =. 1.= ........ .....i....4..:i::O:O i•oo.................::�::::.�::�::e:� a::.......:::•..::�::::o: i::+,:0:.00.:......: ............. ::..::�::::e:::i::e:' W. .................t.....j...j..w.q pgq............j......j.....j..j...j..j .Ow..................j....w. j..w.w.j.ww.......... j.......j....z J.w..tb ,F•�I 50 ..........L......L...J...a...1.y LJL............I.......I....J..I..J. i.Li..................t....d. I..L.O.t.LL.......... i.......I....S...1..L. 1.L ..........j.......p...q...1..p.d 040............j.......j.....j..j..0• •/•O q..................j....d. j..e.d.j.00...........1•......j....;...1 mod. /•6 ..........j.......j....y...j..0.0 000............j.......j.....j..j.•..:.j.n.j..................j....w. j..0.w.j.ww...........j.......j....w...j'0•.t•4 ;... .... . .;.... ... .... . .. . .. ........... .......... ..... . .... .. . . ... . . . . . .. ................... <.dO............ ..............l..1 0.0.1.Od.......................... I..q.p.l.gq...........I....... I....q...l..q. I.p 0 .......... ......5:::: :::5::0:.-',.S.wq.......................... ......:::::!::::::j:::q ::::::::::::::::::j..:q: ::::::::::- :::::::j::::0:::j::w:.j•i• s 30 .........=......=...=...1..='===J................................ ......J , ............. :........:. :.._—:-= •........ :.......:.... ...:.. .:.:. .. .. . . . . ... . . . . . . .. ............1.......<...../...I..O.O<•OO............p.....•1.... .I..d.O.I.00...................I....q. I..d.q.l.pp...........I.......I....p...l..q. I.p ..........0......j....:+...j. ..00 ..........j......j. ..j..j..w.y.j..tw........ ....j...0. j.w w.j.Ow...........j.......j....w...j..0. t•- 20 ..y......t ..y...j...j•y i-4;............i..... ...y..j..;.0.j. j..................j....j. j..w. .j.��...........j......j....y...j.�..t•r ............L......L... ....... . .4. ............... .... .........1..d.O.I......................I...... ......./.8............I.......I....d...1..d. 1.6 ................... ....... p9q............1 .....j.....j..j..q.0•j.:�q...................1....q. I..O.O.j.j.0...........j.......j....q...j..0.'j.j. 10 ............1......L...J.../..d. .... I............d..I..J.d.1.JJ................ .......I....J. 1..8.0./•68..........•I.......I....J...1..4. 1.4 ............_......�...�.........•V:............:....... :....�:::..�.�.:.:�............. .. ....._. ..._.-..-_........................_......-. ..- ............t•......p...e...j.•d•d t•00•...........j.......j.....j j..0.0•j.00..................j....q. j..q.q.r r r...........j.......j....0...j..0-•1•[• 0 ........ - - -. -- ....... .. -_ __ ....... .. _ - .. - . - SILT MEDIUM CRS FINE COARSE SAND GRAVEL 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 SIEVE, mm f FB-RIGGSI Briggs Engineering & Testing NZrA Division of PK Associates,Inc. rPro7iect: Whitehall Estates / Hyannis Sam le no. M-3347 Date: 7/7/9 8. Proctor 119 118 Max. Dry Density 3 117 118.1 pcf 116 Optimum L Moisture ° 115 if 6.8 % IIIII 114 If I I I I I Over Size Correction If IIIII If 113If Li If N/A 112 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Moisture % r [:B:RIC3GSj Briggs Engineering & Testing NA Drwsm OF PK ASSOcIAm,INC. Whitehall Estates /Hyannis Briggs # 82706 Tested: 7-7-98 1. Sample No. Description Source M-3348 Sandy Gravel Sample B (R) 2. Sieve Analysis {ASTM C 136, and ASTM C 1171 Sieve Size Results Specs. {% Passing Gy Wt.} Structural 4" 100 3-1/2" 100 3" 100 100 2-1/2" 100 2" 100 1-1/2" 100 1" 90 3/4" 85 1/2" 76 50-85 3/8" 69 #4 44 40-75 #10 38 #20 22 #40 8 #50 6 * 8-28 #80 2 #100 2 #200 1.4 0-8 3. *Sample tested does not conform to the required specifications for "Structural Fill". 4. Proctor Density {four point procedure - ASTM D 1557 Method C, and ASTM D 4718} Result Maximum Dry Unit Weight (pcf) 133.8 Optimum Moisture Content (%) 5.0 Oversize Correction (%) 15 100 Weymouth Street -Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone (781) 871-6040 9 Fax(781)871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990 9 Fax (401)658-2977 BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing A Division of PK Associates,Inc. rP ro7ie q t: Whitehall Estates / Hyannis Sam le No. M-3348 Date: 7/ 6/9 8 Sieve Analysis 100 3 ............q......P...y...p.4.4 Pe4............p......p...q••1...;-4/•44...................i....q. i...;4.1............ 1.......1. .q...i..q. i.p ..........4.....p...J..4•J..l OOJ............I.......I.....j..1..d.J.1.dd............ ....i....d• I..b.b.l.dd.......... 1.... P...J...i..e. 1.8 90 _ .. - - ----- ....... .. - -- -- ....... . - -- -- ...... - - - ............q......P...y...j..4.4 p44............j.......p...y..j..'j•q•pgq...................j....0. j..q.0.j............ j. ....j....0...j..4• /•P ..........b......p...J...p.p.d bJJ...........i.......i....4..1••J.d.1.Od........ ....1. .d. I..d.b./.0-0........•• I.......I....d...l..d.• 1.8 80 _ .. _ _ _____ ........ _ __ __ ....... .. _ __ _- . _ _ _.. ..•.. .. ... ...... .. ...... .......•..;.. .•.;. .. ...... ....... :.. .. ... ............ ...... .. ............P......j....y...j..4.4 p44............j.......j....q..i..4•q•1.4V......0............j....q. j....p.j.gq....•... i.......i....;...j..4••/•4 ..........I......p...d...1..J.J 4Jd.........../......I....J../..J.d.1.db........ .•.. ......... 1..0.8./.d ..... I.......I....d.../..8.• 1.8 70 ..........4......P...4..1••q.q 1.00............I.......I.....j..j..q.d.1.0d..................j....a. i..q.O.j. I.......j....0...i..0. 1.O ..........j.......j.....j...j.. ..j.:f.j ..........j......j....j..j..:i.y.j.ity........ .•..j.�:..j. j.. wi........ j.......j...q...j..;..' /•P 60 .........i....................8=y............i..........J..i..J.= :::::: ..•...... 1..=.�1 ::::: 1...••..i....=...i•.- 1.= ........::j.::..::j.:::.j:::i::O:o j•oo............:::.::�::::.j::i::d:e:�:ee•..........: .::�::::d: j::;: .i:oo::......:: .:.::j :::i::o• j•o ..........j.......j.....j...j...j.:j j..jw............j.....;.j.....j..i..y..j.j.:f:f................j....w. i.. w.j.pw.......... j.......j.....t...j..w.. j.j. 5U ..........-......I....q...i..-.___-•.........1.......1....J..i..-.=.1.==••........... ....1....-. i.. .-.i.-J.......... i.......1....-...1..=.• i.= .. ........:.... ... _.. .. ............ ...... .. ............1......p...i...�..e.-0 Pdd............1.......j.....i..j..a.q.l.....................1....0. 1.4.d.j.gy.........../.......j....p...j..0•• 1•p �/�� ..........j.......j.....j...j..w.w ............j.......j....y..j...j.w.j.ww.................j....w� w.j.w{........... j.......j....q...j..w.. 1•P a qp ::::::::.._..::.._..._...:..='===="......................^..;..:= :::::: ... ..1. -. ::: ::::::...,......:.... ...:.. I'= :.. ..:... ..•.... .. ..... •. .. . .. .. .. .......... ..... . . ............ ...... j.qq............/.......i.....i..i..-0.o.j.oe........... :....i....4. j..e.e.j.oe..........I.......I....4...j..�.� W. 0 ..........j.......j....y...j..y.:;j.gw............j.......j....y..j...j..j.j.:f.j....... ....j....w. i..{..:..j.w:.......... j................i..w.: 30 ............L......1....J...i...:.5 dJ.:............1.......1....J..I..�..J.t.bJ..... .. ::..:....=. :..�•�•:.•��••::: :...�.......�....=...:..=. 1.= 3 ............�......�..........;.;�.;�...............................;.;.«��... .•::: .... .. .. .. .......... ........ .. .. .4 .. ............p......p.......j..q.q 000....................1.....1.....q•e•1.Op. ...............j....q. i..q.q.i.g0.......... i.......1....O....... i.p ..........j.......:...y..j...j..j S.ww...........j.......j.....j..i...j..;.j. ....... ....j.....j. i..s.w.j.pw...........j.......j....i1...j..w.; 20 ........ :.....�... ...:..�.�_��.......................... 3............ .• .....3. :..5.�...i�...........i.......i....S...i..�.• :.�.. .. .. . ... .. ............r......5....y...j...�.q t.w.�............j.......j.....j..j..q..� ..t4...................I.....j. j...;.4.j.Y4...........j.......j....q...j.. /•f ............ ......�...�...:..J.d 4J................................ ..b. ./....................0........ 1..8.4./.88...........I....................... pp ............j.......j.....j...j..4.4 pg4............j.......i.....i..j. ..j.j.gq...................j....q. j..q.d.j.pp...........j.......j....p...i..q.' 10 j..... ...i...j.; S n ............j...... .........i......i....;...j..w.;i.� ............0......p...4...4-4.4&44.........-.1.......1.... .1..J.d.i.dd.................•1...•d• I..d.O./.db...........I.......I....J...1..6. 1.6 ............ ...... ... ......_.___-.................... ._.........:................... ....... :..�.�.:.��........... ....... .._ ............ .. /•qq............j. .p....j j...j.p.j44...................i....+ ..........j.......j.....j...j..0• 1.4 0 ............... .. _ ............. _ _ ....... _ ...... - - SILT MEDIUM US FINE COARSE SAND GRAVEL 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 SIEVE, mm i BRIG Briggs Engineering & Testing A Division of PK Associates,Inc. rP roi ect: Whitehall Estates 7 Hyannis Sam le no. M-3348 Date: 7/6/9 8 Proctor 134 133 Max. Dry Density 133.8 pcf 132 Optimum Moisture c 131 5.0 % Over Size 130 Correction 15 % 129 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Moisture % f .0 BRIGG Briggs Engineering Testin g A DmsioN op PK Assocam,INc. Memo/Fax Cover Sheet Date: 27 July 1998 To: Ms. Jan Turner Parkside Senior Services, LLC. RE: Whitehall Estates, Hyannis Fax#: (847) 965-0000 From: Ken Oliver This document contains 7 page(s), including cover page. Memo:Jan, Attached please find the revised sieve&proctor data from the two samples of site material provided to us. The Specification requirements for structural fill are now shown on the data sheets. You should note that Sample M-3347 was described to us as being sampled from the left or north side of the site. Sample M-3348 was described to us as being sampled from the right or south side of the site. The sampling was performed by others. As discussed on the telephone, Sample M-3348 falls short of meeting the specification requirements for structural fill by 2% on the No. 50 sieve screen. In light of this,we must retract the last statement in our letter to you dated July 24, 1998 which stated the material did meet the spec. While we feel the material is still suitable,Gary Kane has indicated he would be more " comfortable having his Geotechnical Engineer review the attached data to determine if it should be used as structural fill. Please call if you have any questions or concerns Very truly yours, BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING ie;�l* . a:-L-, Kenneth M. Oliver Vice President cc: Gary Kane @ The Architectural Team,via fax(617) 884-4329 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland,MA 02370 Cumberland,R102864 Phone(781)871-6M• Fax(781)871-7982 Phone(401)658-2990•Fax(401)658-2977 60 =8ti 86 .LZ -in-c Zed Tse 9NI?J88NISN8 SSSIag Z862--Z2-8-LZ9-T J GRIGGG Briggs Engineering & Testing "2A DmsroN oA PK Assomm,INc. w� Whitehall Estates/Hyannis Briggs# 82706 Tested: 7-7-98 1• Stele No. Description Source M-3347 Gravelly Sand Sample A(L) 2. Sieve Analysis (ASTM C 136, and ASTM C 117) Sieve Size Results Secs. To Passing by Wt.) Structural ill 4" 100 3-1/2" 100 3" 100 100 2-1/2" 100 2" 100 1-1/2" 100 1" 99 3/4" 99 1/2" 97 * 50-85 3/8" 95 #4 90 * 40-75 #10 82 #20 58 440 29 #50 21 8-28 #80 10 #100 9 #200 7.6 0-$ 3. *Sample tested does not conform to the required specifications for "Structural Fill". 4. proctor Density {four point procedure- ASTM D 1557 Method C, and ASTM D 4718) Result Maximum Dry Unit Weight (pcf) 118.1 Optimum Moisture Content(%) 6.8 Oversize Correction (%) N/A 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland,MA 02370 Cumberland,RI 02864 Phone(781)871-6040*Fax(781)871-7982 Phone(401)658-2990•Fax(401)658-2977 0Z =8T 86 .2,Z -nf ZOd ZSS 9NIcJSSNI9NS SS9IJH Zg62,—Z2,8-2.Z9—Z M [—BRIGGBI Briggs Engineering &Testing wA D;vs;on of PK Associates,Inc. P r u'e c t: Whitehall Estates / Hyannis Sam le No. M-3347 Date: 7/7/9 8 Sieve Analysis #200 # 4 0 # 10 # 4 3/413 3" 100 ::..........�.. h-.q...t..e 4 T Y .... a....i....i i.e e i se.. . i^i i i ii •r r .......".r"....:...»...;.:. 3- �....."..i.......;....:«>.ea.i.a;....•...� :..r.•..a. i..d.d.l ...�a.a•"aa r.d 90 ......;....�i- 1... ../.d I t`LM........ a... .M...r M.a.s.i�a. ^.... .1. .- 1 =.s::- :.:.. :._:: . ........F r ...... a....w...i^a.s.e.o-en... .. ^++'i H :.:. i i»•}»i«i 'i i ........-.....-d..:." "4:t.^..........."".al:..:.::....{.:..:..:..:.or-}.•dw 4=•d+:•t:i.•�};+.:•:•�_ .. 'y1.....aT.q ;1!(.^."..frd••.d4.4.'11.foCY4Y........«. .............. 80 .::::.:::. ......... ...... ........ ... rt. .....-{......F...q...t^b^f Fdd^ f. y ..d•t q•q•1•gd... r a. .. .b:i bo.:::::::: i::.^.i. -a:. �i."7:i 70 .............^- .w.s-...a.r. arr... ......a....a..•r ...;.v T4^ ....:............:•-r.-•i•r•'a.• ^i^^i i�_.a.n.}e.......... e.......�u...�..a..e. za - ��rr............1...^..!-...r..1^b.a-I.o ....1."�4. 1"4.4'YY4.......... 1.......�.�.q...�.�4'�.4 ..........F......p....j...l^9•V pdd............h .. .}..i..y y.1.p ....;. h-}.4.;.}}.......... i......•iw•}--•i•-{'i.} r h �O ..... ^::.^: :...1...i..Yw J.»....`......I•::..::�::::4..a•A•4.(.0 M.�:...4 I..d.O.i.4d......... I......d..ed.../-d I.G V .a..; i r}e.......... ..............i..;-;.}.T ...-..: -.1.. v 1^i•b•i 3?...... .. 1...«..qt—.a.. 1.i ........ .. „...a......e...a«.I..r +�a-.. ......... f Y f ...«« ..:....l.. ..�...r•4•�}¢;............ ......;....}..,..r. 4 47......-..... ..... . .� .^.....�.:.o--.-o...A.d^0 ...................... . «1..1 .i-rr...«..............1..�. �..~-'.��_Y......a.. i.....^w.iM.iw �i. ...y.......F...{...#:•P•4 Ppq............j-.....F...q..1 q.pgq...„.........w.�....d. �. ...y.....4...r...i.i.r ua...«.-...^i-...•.-t..•.i«� .o.1.ia«.-..-..«. .O.a.l•ab....... 1.......1.-.-0.-I..i. 4i a 40 :. . }h. .F^.}. �..y.y}as.................... ._.._e......."." ...,. .;. ,.{.{.;.}}....., i..-...F-.3...1..{• Ff :..::.:L.....I.....i...a.e.r add...........i.......i....e __ _ aiaa.......... 30 -.w :. :..i..d»aba.. _ :� :i:...a 1 .�.Laa...... .... .':::a. L.a.a.S:g............ �:::::....4- �.•1 *-- , r. i..� ii$^ .c� " . ,..�.T.;.rr.......... 1.......,..-4...;..4.'14 _.......l.......I.....I...I..Yr esr............i.......i.. :i..i.r.i.ir....... I....d I..e.e•I.eY.......... l......y.._Y...p.Y. I.e n ...^�fM .t.yi:-i••3•�i e•}d.........::y..::j'y::i..•P•4•h•fS.......... L+0 Y..-.W..... e.?a.........:..i.. ...r..i..r.a.iaa.........-.. .....• �..�.�...��.::.::.:::.��::..«1....8...:...5.'1.4 4. .-P--4...F-{• }{o.. i. q..j..q p.{.pq. ;•... .••4.4•i•r........ ; - ;..-4...;.{ 14 p....g...a..1.r a rr._ ..1.. .I....r..I..r.o-I.or........ 1....8 I..e•d-baa........ . ..........i•.�.:.b�e�i.:o.d eob::::::::...........1.-..-i 44.1.44 1� _ y.e. aba....... .... ..I..a r.iaa........�.. �.}: :.;..:y {..3•{}{o < I.. j..j^o�•i•oy...... i -' i•}•}•i}}..... ... a... i...i^i•{ i 4 ....a..........rw.l.rr........ .: ..c.... l..r r.}dp-..........t... ..i...� l a I a i.%a "::::::.::::::::.::::::'y-:i•i•o9:::..... -...;^ r^,,,.�.:..._.......... ".-".....-..... 1 es........ ... 0 --_ ua•ui•r.d 6rb....u......a.. ..i..i.i.iii...... �.S.Y}.,:.....u... I.......I....b...l..a SILT RNF MEE)KJ n cFIS RNE COARSE SAND GRAVEL 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 SIEVE, mm oT =eT eG LZ -inc tad TGB SN I ZISSN I SNS SSS I ZJH z8GL—ZL8—LZ9—T BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing A DIVisiOn Of PK A6800ietes,Inc. rPr iect: Whitehall Estates / Hyannis Sam le no. M-3347 Date: 7/7/98, Proctor 119 118 IIIIII lilt Max. Dry Density fit 117 1 )lilt 118.1 pcf 116 Optimum h Moisture 1111111111 11s 6.8 11a Over Size Correction 113 NIA lilt - 112 3 4 5 6 7 $ 9 10 11 12 Moisture % TT =8T 86 .2.E 7nE VOd TSB SNIZI89NISN3 SSSI�JH Z862,—TL8—LT9—T iJ 25 FBRIGGS-1 Briggs Engineering & Testing A Dmstav of PK Assocu=INC. Whitehall Estates/Hyannis Briggs# 82706 Tested: 7-7-98 1. Sample No. Description Source M-3348 Sandy Gravel Sample B (R) 2. Sieve Analysis {ASTM C 136, and ASTM C 117} Sieve Size Results Secs. {°Io Passing by Wt.} Structur ill 4" 100 3-1/2" 100 3" 100 100 2-1/2" 100 2" 100 1-1/2" 100 lit 90 3/4" 85 1/2" 76 50-85 3/8" 69 #4 44 40-75 #10 38 #20 22 #40 8 450 6 * 8-28 #80 2 #100 2 #200 1.4 0-8 3. *Sample tested does not conform to the required specifications for "Structural Fill". 4. Proctor Density {four point procedure- ASTM D 1557 Method C, and ASTM D 4718) Result Maximum Dry Unit Weight(pcf) 133.8 Optimum Moisture Content(%) 5.0 Oversize Correction(%) 15 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland,RI 02864 Phone(781)871-6040•Fax(781)871-7982 phone(401)658-2990-Fax(401)658-2977 ZZ =8Z 86 ,Lz -in-c SBd ZS8 SNIJ88NISN8 S99IJ8 Z8GL-Z2,8-LZ9-Z r • BR I G G=S Briggs Engineering &Testing A Division of PKAssociates,Inc. rp_r,o",—ect: Whitehall Estates / Hyannis ",,-Sample No. M-3348 Date: 7/6/9 8 Sieve Analysis # 200 # 4 0 # 1 0 # 4 3/411 3" 100 w......1...d..i-i.4 41v4..... i» -i.....i-4 4.4_. ii..:::... y....q. »9.y req...... 47...y. d4.d4Twd44^•^......... ....: wi.rd. I =.... 1« 1. .... TO 1•10 i.iy -1 I.y4hy4e........ :.1. i..e.e-{•:s.......... i» ..�...-d...i..: ......... :... r a. pp ..... ...r......i...y...r :• rzv..... :...... _. _ r•Ta•#f........: 00 ............ :. N�•r.a eao....-.._...r-----i..»b +-4.4- i..a-FF 4+........ ..4.4i}i......._...{.._...{....4..i..i••}•{•T}•••........-. }.. �. 1..�.$sai...... ........ e....--i•�••i...{•-4• t44............p......h...y.q..$•T•h44...............i.... . �..4-a.Fii.... i.......i....d...i..d.. .........I......a...$...t$$t$$.. -_ a.a a+o. 1-�..r...+...}..o. 70 :........�......�...y... w bd'.: ^_.L ..{....5..i..b d.i.bb. ..� i....+ ` a.e«a .........r•T T41.. ..r{...-.. .y...'r.�.{.dl............. ..I....i. S..i.�.i• .......•..s.»u.:...J.u/.•�-0{b'$+0.. w.l«.•.1•...J .1...4 J.t.00..w..0 ...l..�d. }.•e.e.e .. i.�.»i....i...i..i.' 1 ........... {.......{...}..•{-•�4-4 h4y........ I—.. ::-1 : :9.1.40: ... ....�. .L '.......... }--- 60 .-.1...+.{.$bis........•...N._:..:...a.�..�.a...oa....:::... ...i....a. 1_+.4 .+a.......... ,...»..�....a...1 $ b L •..._...r......}...J...?. ...»i.............._............. ....�....�. {_4. }...«..... :.»»........�...I::: _f.. ..i q...n.d.d iii....... _i.....,...i-i..a.4./.eo.. ... . .J «� } 4. Tte.......... :.•$��i-4�Y... .:j..:•::�...y..i..yiti•}4.........»... ••ll r e.i«i........... i.....:mi....d«.j..� +:� ..,....r !.. .+.1+d.......... I.......1...a..l. p 50 .........p. -4--4-4-4.4{.}}.....» :. ..Y.y..i_...»_............ ..:�..;. , .;.{.;;.......... {.......}...•a...}.3• I•�* •+� :::::.'-h......p....}...�..$..�w�s�::::: :.i. :i_:..a.w.�: ......... ....I:».:}: 1 t"P•174:».::.::.�::::.:' ::s.:•'.•t. i.t ;...i..{.4{4}.......».�{.......;....,}.a_}.}.j.}}...._ ... a e.{ .......... ;............. .}..}. i•� Q.1 L�Q .....: ...J...I..i.i tit- Ww»:a."''•�.�:$.ai$...- ••... :::�T .8.8.4+b.......... i»:::::r".::��.y..a: }......{..y_.j.3:1 b » ».}.e_.............. ••-}: i•}}{•og•.. .. ..........l.......P.u./.....•y�Ora....r......./».....i.....1:.i..b.d.i.a+.....«...- ...p...t. i..e.e.4tt....`y.. i.......i-•..:.»i..}-�i.8 2.Q .`.,.44.u«.......}....u.i.....{..lui.4a...dggi......... . {.......i.....}...i..S. ip V' ...:..:.y.....::{.:::}...{..}•4 444............N.....I.......I..4:.f.1.OJ... ..•.j....�. 1-4-444i.......... 1.......1....4..q..q. 1.4 30 ........J..»..b...d...b.+.i i=r.: .. ..Iu.uu1�..J ..M».d. .i a.b ::.... i. 1 :�:- Y• 1 ..i. ..A-.. .u.�.�» ..;».»..{....4..1_4.}.{.44... ...i. .3. I.......... a}•'r•r u.......•.•.....b...n...i-pM Ool-.. ...•1.. ..I....A..I..A.d.1.Jd- ... ...1.••.1. )..1.�.6►i,.......... 1...»..1....+-..1..1r 1.4 a.4++-1.................... ........... . .:j..y-4 r04• .........!» V•i ..........:: ::i.-•�}• {..}..p.j.}}.......... '...».y.».q...i y' 13 20 .••....J.....b...i»...i.i _ :.::. _ . W .u.l.ei. 3 1.i.Lii.... _ {» { .{•%r }r4.}. ... .i...4.i»}.q 4.....s..... ..i. �. 1 f.T.{.�........................}..yu}. {.} a......o...e...f s$t$$. .. .a : �....a_� a. .�.a+.... ..h ..........i�......r_.a-•.{..:w i•od............a.......1•::•a�I� •d l•Jd«.......... ..y....4. i_p e•:'4►":::'�...{.......j._.d...{« Pi l0 : :.... .. .. ... a aaa..........J......b...d. $.a.La$....._...... ... . . L C. G.. ..I.......t._.a..a»a Li {......i...4..i..}»3{.}4. »j» ..i... ; e.:.i«-.«. ::i...i. i..}.}.}y}. ... ..j.... .j. .e. s»e i•- ..........t.. ..t...$...l..a.a Aid.........»I... rr ..1... .,•r•4.arn......... ..{....$. i..+.+.I.+a- .,-....I....y...l..r. e. ........::a�..a.:...i:::i::d.d 7.dd:........ •.I...:q:y:..i..j•1.}q':::...» .:i.. ..... i.......i....4...1..4. pp 0 ....... ...I....a..I.a.iJ.si.:.......:.: :..y.�.i.;.A........................i...l.s. /.i SILTFINE MEDW tr-s HIVE COARSE SAND GRAVEL 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 SIEVE, mm Z Z :8 Z 86 .Lz —inr gad Z S8 SN I ZtISSN I 9NS S99 I ZJS z862.—T L.8—Z,Z 9—Z B141G S Briggs Engineering &Testing �= A Division of PK Assoclates,Inc. rP ro J'eq t: Whitehall Estates / Hyannis Sam ie no. M-3348 Date: 7/6/9 8 Proctor 134 133 Max. Dry Density IVIIIIII3 133.8 pcf 132 Optimum Moisture 131 5.0 % Over Size 130 Correction 15 % 129 -------I-LL UtA: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Moisture % £Z :8T 86 .LZ -inn Lad ZS8 JNI�:199NISN8 S9SINE Z86L—TL8—LT9—Z wr fiP'.^ Soils Inspection Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES/HYANNIS BRIGGS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#. 82706 vim~ INSPECTOR: Brian Cooper EMP.#: 324 REPORT#: DATE: 8/5/98 CODE. S26 ARR.TIME: 12:30 pm JOB HR&: 4 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L WIND: H L X HUMID.: H X L SUNNY X CLOUDY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. Location: wing #4 around footing wing #5 east wall Remarks: The substitute superintendent was notified of all test results. Technician: Brian Cooper Approved Soils Compaction Report BRIG GS Briggs Engineering & Testing If A DMsion of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECTS: '92 FISPECTOFt: n,` e C' Z EMPJ: 2 REPORT#: DATE: CODE: Z ARR.TIME 12 ?� J013 MS- 41 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: Hg♦ L WIND: H L!/ HUMID-, A/li L SUNNY CLOUDY Maximum Dry Dens' ,Cg Optimum Moisture Content~ J � Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone Nuclear Densometer Tes Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum No. Area Tested %Comp. % Comp. Content 1/ Moisture % #' 2 d -y t '-eK :�& -5 "15, • r • o , S, i Tests not meeting requirements: e Who noted: r�i Recommendations: 'Vot'te Remarks: A)oA.o Technician: bel9j, Approved Concrete (Cylinder Test Result CF-11 ZLL � Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: Gvl�? ' 3RIGGS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 4Z ? Date: Client: Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Location: L,,4 5rr�T�, Mix proportions 14110 11 7�cy (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount ►ment lbs. 4 1 14 Ticket No.: 2 Batch T iime: ie Aggregate lbs. Strenqth Delivered: 300C )arse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 300-(:) ater Gals. Set No.: -rime of Test: ater Reducing o=. Truck No.: Load #.: 7 r Entraining oz. Number of C.A. Size::her oz. Slump Air Content 5,0 ASTM C-143 -/ /y ASTM C-231/C-173 aid Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: 7� e Air Temp.:TM C-1W ASTM C-1064 amarks: Contractor and By whom prepared:906 ►^r i- nducer are both responsible Gals. �11 Concrete Source: r added water as per ASTM General Contractor ,, P �+ 'k c7�% r► 20 •94. Discharge time limit Storage Location:f l),f9," jP14 e i-nenImin. max. min. or 300 revolutions. Curing Box: Curing Temp. F* CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 I 3 Day Air Dry Unit Wei ht: Pcf Unit Wei ht As Received: pc:f Decimen Date Age D'ia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fractur_ I lumber Tested at test in. in. (sq. in. cf L.BS. Strength PSI ASTM C-391. f u r .4 Approved: 14 CONCRETE PLACEMENT wsPECT�or� BRIGGS Briggs Engineering 8t Testing PRO.>ECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 mac- _.. V 4WEC Brian Cooper ARFLTw-- 12:00 m JOBHRS.: 3 DATE: 7/28/98 CODE C26 TEMP.: H 85° L 75 WIND: H L HUMID.: H L SUNNY X CLOUDY Corte Source: Cape Cod Redi Mix General Contractor. Congress Construction Storage Location: Box Other. near placement Inspection completed as per ACI-301 and Contract Documents. A checklist of major items is presented. All items in non-conformance are either corrected during inspection or noted herein. Detailed inspection of reinforcing for size. quantity, grade, spacing and configuration is reported separately when performed. Preplacement Weather X Steel arrangement X Temp. X - Seel cieardnce X Fors for general requirements. X Steel cleanliness X Grade preparation X Steel supports X Placement Concrete placed within limits of ASTM C-94 and Contract Documents. Non-compliance items are either corrected before placement or noted herein. Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C-172 ASTM C-94 Limits ASTM C-94 Limits Time Limits X 1-1/2 hrs. max. Temperature X 50-9W F Slump X 38 - 5- M ARV N/A 70-300 Rev. Air conWM X 4 - 6 % Density N/A * 3 p.a.f. Limon: wing #4 east and south walls; wing #5 south and west wall footing Remarkm John Feeney, superintendent, was notified*of all test results. Method of placement Chute* X Pump Other Load Arr. Truck No. o Mix Cone. Slump Air Air Conn Conc. CA Cyl. Set Gak. Unit No. Time No. Yds. Duration Temp (in.) (%) Temp Strength Strength Size Fabr. # added Weight min. Defiv. Required water cf 1 12:0 58 12. 84 760 4 4.8 780 3000 3000 3 4 4 1 2 2:10 55 12 75 780 4.25 5 800 3000 3000 3 4 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 _ 8 9 10 Approved: CConcrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 X. Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: tUl�r'4 II 3RIG t'�: 0S A Division of PK Associates. Inc. PROJECT#: g 706 Date• 7 20-9U Client: Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Location:Lu IrE- f f(� f (✓��/ Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount ament lbs. Ticket No.: �'� Batch Time: ie Aggregate Ibs. Strength Delivered: 6 o c) i )arse Aggregate Ibs. Strength Required: 3GOC.) afar GaG. Set !`:o.: .:- T—e of Teri ater Reducing oz. IL Truck No.: �� Load #.: J— r Entraining oz. Number of C.A- Size: 3 - then oz. Slump [�•` Air Content ASTM 0-143 / ASTM C-231/C-173 eld Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: / Air Temp.: ��• 31M C-138 ASTM C-1064 (� smarks: Contractor and whom prepared: 5efi o✓) oducer are both responsible Gals 1�1 Concrete Source: Cfa . zu r added'water as per ASTM of water 25 General Contractor C,or► f � added .94. Discharge time limit 00� �35 Storage Location:/Vt'f'.+�°6'jiq--e•,en4- min. max. ) min. or 300 revolutions. Curing Box: Curing Temp. F' CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-?f3 3 Dav Air Dryv Unit Weight Pcf Unit Weiczht As Received: pcf pecimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Dumber Tested at test in. in. (sq. in. cf LBS. I Strength PSI ASTM C-3T 3 i" 81�?Iq� '7p� y '' 1z.e� � . (,� I ? 1 q50 + 9 S-1q� 11Lq 2- Approved: Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 PROJECT: ' B R I O G S Briggs Engineering & Testing , A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: d Date: -2 -' (, Client: ' Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: Mix proportions nro- . , eas•�- �.�� .�� � �,'�+ (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. Ticket No.: . Batch Time: :O�o Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: O O O Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3 O o0 Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: 3 O Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: 7 Load #.: Air Entraining oz. Number of CA: C.A. Size: 3 Other oz. Slump: 411V Air Content: 6�'- 5 71 ASTM C-143 / AST -2 C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: c Air Temp.: ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 902 g60 Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: ow ' producer-are both responsibleConcrete Source:ect ` eo . for added water as per ASTM - -- General Contractor• �� e 70 C-94..-Discharge time limit Stora a Location:90.mins. or 300 revolutions. ,� min. max. Curing Box: (ffk) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 Day Air Dry Unit Weight: Unit Wei ht As Received: Pcf rpecimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested -at test in. in. (sq. in. cf LBS. Stren th PSI ASTM C-39 Z. A 7.Z3.g1$ 7 6 " 12" 28.3 143, 1 77 Z760 •� B 6=6. 6 28 6 " 12" 28.3 1.433 C $•13 96 28 6 " 12" 28.3 43,Z D 28 6 " 12" 28.3 1.431 Approved: RMU i iQ ..................:....:::::::::...............................::........................................................ ::::::::::.::::::::::::::::.:::.. BRIGGS Briggs Engineering &Testing PROJECT: Whitehall Estates A Division of PKAssodates,Inc PROJ#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Chad Hancock EMPM 0918 REPORT# DATE: 08/06/9(8 CODE: D2922 ARRV: 7:30 JOB HRS. T.T: MILEAGE: TEMP.: 65-85F WIND: Low HUMID: High (SUNNY) CLOUDY NO OF PAGES TO THIS REPORT: 1 Of 1 NO.OF BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 0 Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D-698. Location: Inside wall footing Wing #4 Remarks: Arrived at the above named project site as the client requested in order to conduct a Soils Inspection. Due to failure of test for structural material, no backfilling of wall took place. New material will be tested and used for fill. Super, Nick Fitzgerald, was notified of findings. Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: r ®Lask 115RIGGSI Briggs Engineering & Testing A DIVISION OF PK Assocwn,INc. w August 7, 1998 Briggs# 82706 Parkside Senior Services, L.L.C. 5215 Old Orchard Road Suite 700 Skokie, IL 60077-1045 Attn: Ms. Jan Turner RE: Analysis of Soil sample for proposed use at Whitehall Estates Ms. Turner : Laboratory analysis of your sample has been conducted and the results are as follows, please see enclosed If you have any questions,please feel free to call me at your convenience. Very truly yours, BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING A Division of PK Associates, Inc. Mark Liebert Materials Laboratory Supervisor Construction Technology Division Enclosures: 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone (781) 871-6040•Fax (781)871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990 9 Fax (401)658-2977 ZIA h [P—RIGGS7 Briggs Engineering & Testing A Dmsm of PK Assocwa,INC. Whitehall Estates Briggs # 82706 Tested: 8-6-98 I. Sample No. Description Source M-3475 Site mixture Site 2. Sieve Analysis {ASTM C 136, and ASTM C 1171 Sieve Size Results Specs. {% Passing by Wt.) Structural Fill 4" 100 3" 100 100 2-1/2" 100 2" 100 1-1/2" 93 1" 88 3/4" 87 1/2'' 86 * 50-85 3/8" 84 #4 80 * 40-75 #8 75 #16 62 #30 40 #50 25 8-28 #100 18 #200 8.4 * 0-8 3. *Sample tested does not conform to the required specifications for "Structural Fill". 4. Proctor Density {four point procedure - ASTM D 1557 Method C, and ASTM D 4718). Result Maximum Dry Unit Weight (pcf) 128.6 Optimum Moisture Content (%) 7.1 Oversize Correction (%) 13 100 Weymouth Street - Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone (781) 871-6040• Fax (781)871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990• Fax (401)658-2977 r r BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing N�Zf A Division of PK Associates,Inc. rProiect: Whitehall Estates �ample n�o ��M �47 Date: �/6/ 8 Sieve Analysis 100 #200 #50 #8 #4 3/4" 3" ......... .. .. . _ ........ .. ........ ....... ....1...... ..........j.... - - _ ........ ... - ........ --- ....... .. .... ..... _.. r. _ .. ... .. ... .....................q....4...j...1.3.1.S.q.............I....... ....41....,...I../.q.,.i.............y.. ...,.....,... ..p.y.�..I:!: .....:•• .,....: t• .....................p....p...p..l..i.I.pp.............,....... ....(....,...1.. :... ,...p..p.p.,. ).p.,.i.............p.. ..p...,.. ..p.p.p.,.,.. ..../...../...p.. ...........i.... ..i.. ........ ... ..i....3.. ..5....t.i.......... ..i.. ....3..........L..i•.�-.3. 80 .... .. -_ __ _...................... __ __.f. ......... .. .t.q ..t....j...j..j...j.S.......... — ..j... ...j.j............. ....j.........�..5.. ..... ..j........j....�.............: .. ... '. ......:. ... �.j. .. ..,... ..q....q...(...,..j I.t.q..................... ....p...t..y..t.q.,.p.............j."...j.....,... w..:.:..,.,............. 70 (.......q....p...,...,..i.,.pq.............j....... ....i....,..q../.q.,.i............. ...,.....,... ..p.y.t.,.,............. .....j.....j...p..<..�.I. .....................p....J...p..,..i.,.LJ.............,....... ....I....,.....J•J•1•I........... .. ...,.....,... ..p.p.L.l.l............. .. .............:.......L....J...:...:..:.:.LL.............:....... ....t....3..J..i..:.i.4........ ...i.....I... ...i.:............. .. ...5...4..:..L' r..l ......... .. — — _— ........ ... — ... _ _—_ ........ .. — ..........j.... . — — ........ — .... _ ___ ....... .. _ _ ..j.. ...... 3 r 60 ::r::::: ::_:�::r ....... .. ............. ,....... ....i....,..q..,.q.,. ...........q.. ...,.....,... ..q.q.p.,.,...........:. .. ...t....;...,..:..p.j. .............p......q....p...,...,..i q.p p............q....... ....i....,.../.q.p., ............q.. ...,.....,... ..p.q.pq.,...................../.....,...p..i..p.i. .............I.......J....L...1...1..1.1.44.............1....... ....i....l...)..I.J. ..............J.. ...1.....1... ..L.J.4.1.1............. .......1.....1...4..4•L•1. .; 50 ..........i.... ..i.s. ..........3..... ..t....3. .:.......... ..i.....{... .i............. .. .J...L..:..:..t. C .::::::.. - - ::: -- ::..... :::::... _ _ .....:: .. :.. .. :. .. .. :... to ......... ..j...,..i .. ......:....... ...p...,...j. .w:j.S.............w.. ::::::I... :w.w::. :j::........::: .. ..........40 .................::p::::q:..,...,..(.j.pq.............I....... ...(....,... .j.p.,.(.............-0.. :::j.....,... .q.q.p.j.,............. .: .....j...p..i..p.i. :: ..I.......J....L...1...1.•1.3.4 J.............1....... :...p...l. .I.J.I.I.............J.. .........1... ..L.J.4.1.1............. ::....I.....I.......I..L.1. .....................J....L.......1..1.I.L4.............1....... ....i....l ...{.L.1.(.............J.. ............. ..L.S.i•.1.1............. .....1.....I...L..:..L.(. 0 ......... .. — — _— ........ .. — ........ _ _—_ ....... .. ..j.. ........ .. ........ .. ..:... .. ..... . . . . .. . . ... . .. ... .. .............I.......q....q...(...,..,.,.qq.............,....... .i....,...r..1.q.,.i.............q.. ...,.....i... ..q.q.S..,.,............. .......,.....j...p..�..S..l. .: .............i.......q....p...,...,..(.,.p p.............,...... ...(....,...I..I.L.i.(.............q.. ...i.....i... ..p.q.p.,.,............. .......,.....I...i...i..p.,. ..........I......p....J...l...l..l.1.4 b...........1.. ..i....1...1..1.5.1........... .. 20 ...................... .......:. .. . — _ ............. .. .....:::..J.. ..1.....1... ..J.J........................................................... ....:......j.......q....q...j...j..j.j.f. .........j....... ...y...j...j..j..j.j.S.............y.. ...j.....j... ..q.yJ..j.j............. .....j.....j...S...S..t..j. 1 0 ,.......J....q...,...,..i... ...:................. ...i....I.../..,.q.,.i.............q.. ...i.....,... ..p.q.p.,.,.............. ::...I..... .. ..,.:.....p....p...,...l..i. .p..................... ....(....,...I..I.p.,.(.............J.. ...i.....,... ..p.p.L.,.,.............:. ...1....�:..p..i..p.,. ...i.....1... p..(..(..,. .• .............I.......L....J...1...:.. .�.LL.............:....... ....:....3...3..3.L.I...............J.. ..L.L.L.3.I............. .....i.....3...•..3..4 ..................... — _ ........ ... ........ ....... .. •i• 0 - - _ ........ _ _ --- ....... .. _ SILT FINE MEDIUM CRS FINE OaWSE 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 Sieve Size (mm) lot BRIG Briggs Engineering & Testing NZfA Division of PK Associates,Inc. rProiect: Whitehall Estates Sam le no. M-3475 �Dat�e- 8�/6/9 8 Proctor 129 128 Max. Dry Density 3 127 128.6 pcf 126 Optimum Moisture A 125 IIII7.1 % fill IIII 124 Over Size Correction 123 I I I 1 4 13 % 122 : m:Fu::±- 0" 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .13 Moisture f 1 ,T y r� t '} t.. E@RIGGS7 Briggs Engineering & Testing A Divism of PK Assocmm,INc. August 6, 1998 Project No 82706 Jan Turner Parkside Senior Services, L.L.C. 5215 Old Orchard Road Suite 700 Skokie, IL 60077-1045 RE: Whitehall Estate, Whitehall Way, Hyannis, Ma Daily Geotechnical Field Report for August 5, 1998 At the request, of Nick Fitzgerald of Congress Construction, the undersigned Geotechnical Engineer visited the above site to observe the foundation subgrade and site conditions. The results of the visit are discussed below: BUILDING AREA EXCAVATIONS The undersigned engineer observed the previously excavated footing trench along the northwest and northeast parts of the proposed building footprint. The excavations extended to firm stratified fine to coarse sand with a trace of silt. Refer to the attached sketch for locations. SOIL PILES The undersigned engineer observed soil piles located on the south and central part of the site. Piles of topsoil and subsoil are located in the southwest area within or just outside the building footprint. Piles of gravelly sand exist in the central and east parts of the building area. These piles contain some of the finer sand with little gravel. This soil mixture is intended for use within the building up to the bottom of the final lift of fill in accordance with the recent recommendation by Geotechnical 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone(781) 871-6040• Fax (781)871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990•Fax (401) 658-2977 Whitehall Estates, Hyannis, MA Project No. 82706 ALl-ust 5. 1998 Site Visit Page 2 of 2 i Consultants. A sample of the soil mixture was collected by Briggs for laboratory sieve analyses and Proctor. A large pile of gravelly sand exists near the northwest part of the proposed building area. This soil is consistent with the Structural Fill on site soil removed from the footing excavations. It should be noted that the soils observed on the exposed surfaces of the piles are dry. This soil will likely require moistening in order to achieve the required compaction if used as fill. Very truly yours, BRIGGS ENGINEERING &TESTING A Division of PKAssociates,Inc. nt David Geisser Paul M. Skorohod Project Engineer President DWG:PMS:dg Enclosure: Site Sketch l r ■ i Atid• L,4e t�v G / A/c ee PU5 OF ROc—'t5 SAP o U LOCATION PLAN NOTES PROPOSED WHITEHALL ESTATE — HYANNIS, MA LOCATIONS ARE BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING APPROXIMATE. [BRIGGS1 100 WEYMOUTH STREET, UNIT B1 J ROCKLAND, MASSACHUSETTS DR. BY: DWG SCALE: 1"=40' +/- PROJ. NO: 82706 CK'D BY: PMS DATE: - °}F3 FIGURE NO. 1 f t M 21*1 k GRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing A DIVISION OF PK ASSOc/ATES,/Nc. UU August 17, 1998 Project No 82706 Jan Turner Parkside Senior Services, L.L.C. 5215 Old Orchard Road Suite 700 Skokie, IL 60077-1045 RE: Whitehall Estate, Whitehall Way, Hyannis, Ma Geotechnical Field Report for August 13, 1998 At the request. of Nick Fitzgerald of Congress Construction, the undersigned Geotechnical Engineer visited the above site to observe the foundation subgrade and site conditions. The results of the visit are discussed below: BUILDING AREA EXCAVATIONS The undersigned engineer observed the previously excavated elevator pit footings on the north and south areas of the building footprint. Briggs also observed the ongoing excavation of exterior wall footing trench on the northeast part of the building area. The excavations extended to firm stratified fine to coarse sand with a trace of silt. Refer to the attached sketch for locations. BACKFILLING Briggs observed the placement and compaction of a six inch thick lift of on-site gravelly sand. The soil consisted of a mixture of the gravelly sand and a smaller portion of the fine to medium sand with less gravel. The soil mixture is consistent with the recent soil mixture sample tested by Briggs for maximum dry density (Proctor test). This soil mixture was placed to within approximately two feet of 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone 781 871-6040 e Fax 781 871-7982 Phone 401 658-2990 9 Fax 401 658 2977 Y Whitehall Estates, Hyannis. MA Project No. 82706 ft August 13. 1998 Site Visit Pa-e 2 of 2 finished bottom of slab grade. It is the opinion of Briggs that the soil mixture is suitable as backfill to within one foot of the proposed bottom of slab grade. Gravelly sand meeting the project specification for Structural Fill is recommended directly below the slab. The compaction was tested by the Briggs field technician and adequate compaction in excess of the required 95% compaction was measured. Upon completion of the wall footing trench excavation, the undersigned engineer departed, leaving the technician to monitor and test subsequent fill compaction. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours, BRIGGS ENGINEERING &TESTING A Division of PK Associates,Inc. i a David Geisser Paul M. Skorohod Project Engineer President DWG:PMS:dg Enclosure: Site Sketch a.JQ 4, U wQ i ?X1O alcca e' cu n� S� ViSI�'• y r d c 4 1 0 w 6 N IA1,S LOCATION PLAN NOTES PROPOSED WHITEHALL ESTATE - HYANNIS, MA LOCATIONS ARE BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING APPROXIMATE. BRIGGS 100 WEYMOUTH STREET, UNIT B1 NOW ROCKLAND, MASSACHUSETTS DR. BY: DWG I SCALE: 1"=40' +/- PROJ. NO: 82706- CK'DBY: PMS DATE: FIGURE NO. 1 f i 1 .................. >:.::.: ..... :.:::.::.;;;:.;:.:.;:.: .............. BRIGGS Briggs Engineering &Testing PROJECT: Whitehall Estates A Division of PKAssociates,Inc. -� PROJ#: 82706 . INSPECTOR Chad Hancock EMP#: 0918 REPORT# DATE: 08/12/98 CODE: D2922 ARRV: 8:00 JOB HRS. 6.0 T.T: MILEAGE: TEMP.: 65-75F WIND: Low HUMID: Hi h SUNNY (CLOUDY) NO OF PAGES TO THIS REPORT: 1 of 2 NO.OF BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 1 Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D-698. Location: Fill of inside wall of Wing #5 and total finished sub-slab grade of Wing #4 Remarks: Arrived at the above named project site as the client requested in order to conduct a Soils Inspection. Seventeen compaction tests were conducted in the areas as noted on the attached report. All tests met and or exceeded the minimum compaction requirement of 95%. Super, Nick Fitzgerald, was notified of findings. of i 9 t t ' 1 t i Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: :�A z 9 4Soils Compaction Report. 11*8i 8R1OOS Briggs Engineering & Testing ��na,l S tS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. . IPIROJECT#.- 4ac2706. INSPECTOR: EMPA. REPORT#.* DATE CODE ARR.TIME "6--!O0 JOB HRS.: CS T.T.: MILEAGE.- TEMP.: . H65' L 75'0 WIND: H HUMID.: L6 L SUNNY OUD Maximum Dry Dens' . O timum Moisture Content: Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone Nuclear Densometer Tesl Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum No. Area Tested %Comp. % Comp. Content °/ Moisture % 6 s o `7 l , J l� 471 a s < < 4s� , S f , Tests not meeting requirements: A/a.,,� Who notified: ' Recommendations: Alp n42 Remarks: t/o ► t i ��--/�2� o'l, �`CS�. '[ Technician: • Approved CONCRETE PLACEMENT INSPECTION A01!X PROJECT: Whitehall Estates BRIGGS Briggs Engineering&Testing oa70G NZ-VA Division or PK Associates,tne. PRO. d Inspector: Chad Hancock ARRIVTIME: 7:30 JOBHRS.: 8 DATE: 08/ 06/ 98 CODE: C26 TEMP.: 65-90F WIND: H M (L) HUMID.: (H) M L (SUNNY) CLOUDY Concrete Source: Cape Cod Reday Mix General Contractor: Congress Construction Storage Location: Curing Box: ( No Other: Outside footing on west side Inspection completed as per ACI-301 and Contract Documents. A checklist of major items is presented. All items in non-conformance are either corrected during inspection or noted herein. Detailed inspection of reinforcing for size, quantity, grade, splicing and configura)ion is reported separately when performed. Preplacement: Weather CK Steel arrangement OK Temp. CK Steel clearance OK Forms for general requirements CK Steel cleanliness OK Grade preparation OK Steel support OK Placement: Concrete placed within limits of ASTM C-94 and Contract Documents. Non-compliance items are either corrected before placement or noted herein. Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C-172. ASTM C-94 Limits ASTM C-94 Limits Time Limits CK 1-1/2 hrs. max. Temperature OK 50-909F Slump OK 3 " to 5 " Mixing - 70-300 Rev i Air Content OK 4 to 6 % Density - t 3 P.O. Location: Final footing at Wing #3 and final wall at Wing #5 i i Remarks: Informed Nick Fitzgerald of all findings and test results. 3 4 Method of Placement: Chute X Pump Other Load Arr. Truck No. of Mix Conc. Slump Air Air I Concrete Concrete CA Cyl Set Gals. Unit No. Time No. Yds. Duration Temp. (in.) % Temp Strength Strength Size Fabr. # added Weight min. F F Delivered Required water cf 1 08:00 59 12 90 mins. 85 4 1/2 5.8 90 30 00 30 00 3/4 4 1 0 2 12:10 50 12 80 mins. 30 00 1 30 00 3/4 - 0 3 4 5 ' 6 7 8 i 9 �. 10 Approved: j P 1Ay , 1 r� EB:RIG Briggs Engineering & Testing A DmsioN oP PK Assocmm,INc. August 12, 1998 IN Project No 82706 Jan Turner Parkside Senior Services, L.L.C. 5215 Old Orchard Road Suite 700 Skokie, IL 60077-1045 RE: Whitehall Estate, Whitehall Way, Hyannis, Ma Geotechnical Field Report for August 12, 1998 Site Visit The undersigned Geotechnical Engineer visited the above site to monitor the backfilling procedures inside the proposed building. Varying blends of on site soil mixtures exist at the site. Gary Kane of The Architectural Team, Inc. has expressed concerns that the soil compaction be monitored and tested closely. Briggs recently completed a Proctor test on the gravelly sand soil mixture which is being utilized as fill in the proposed building area. The undersigned engineer visited the site to witness placement and compaction of the fill and observe the compaction testing by our filed technician. One lift of fill was observed placed and compacted during the site visit. The fill was spread 8" thick and was compacted by making four passes by a large vibratory plate compactor. The layer was then tested. Soil moisture at 5% and compaction at 96% was measured. Given the observed compaction methods and reported optimum moisture content, the soil mixture being placed as fill today appears consistent with the sample recently Proctor tested. 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone (781)871-6040 a Fax (781) 871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990•Fax (401)658-2977 f Whitehall Estates, Hyannis, MA Project No. 82706 ' AuRust 12, 1998 Site Visit Page 2 of 2 a Additional Proctor testing does not appear warranted at this time. Should the soil mixture change, Briggs will perform additional Proctor(s) to allow accurate compaction testing. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions regarding this report. Very truly yours, BRIGGS ENGINEERING &TESTING A Division of PK Associates,I c. i avid Geisser Proje7t Engineer V Paul M. Skorohod President DWG:PMS:dg swab CONCRETE PLACEMENT INSPECTION BRIGCS Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 NSPECTOR: Matt Skorohod ARR.TIME: 12:30 pm JOB HRS.: 2 DATE: 8/19/98 CODE: C26 TEMP.: H 750L ]WIND: H L X HUMID.: H L X ISUNNY X CLOUDY Concrete Source: Cape Cod Ready Mix General Contractor: Storage Location: at placement Curin Box: Other: Inspection completed as per ACI-301 and Contract Documents. A checklist of major items is presented. All items in non-conformance are either corrected during inspection or noted herein. Detailed inspection of reinforcing for size, quantity, grade, spacing and configuration is reported separately when performed. Preplacement: Weather X Steel arrangement X Temp. X Steel clearance X Forms for general requirements. X Steel cleanliness X Grade preparation X Steel supports X Placement: Concrete placed within limits of ASTM C-94 and Contract Documents. Non-compliance items are either corrected before placement or noted herein. Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C-172. ASTM C-94 Limits ASTM C-94 Limits Time Limits X 1-1/2 hrs. max. Temperature X 50-90° F Slump X - 4 ' Max. Mixing N/A 70-300 Rev. Air content X 4 - 6 % .. Densit y _N/A t 3 p.c.f. Location: nortH side east wing, wall at east and north side Remarks: John. Feeney, superintendent, was notified of all results and findings. All concrete tested met Jo specifications. Method of placement: Chute X Pump Other Load Arr. Truck No. ol Mix Conc. Slump Air Air Conc. Conc. CA Cyl. Set Gals. Unit No. Time No. Yds. Duration Temp. (in.) (%) Temp. Strength Strength Size Fabr. # added Weight min. °F °F Deliv. Required water cf 1 :00 59 9 90 76° 4 4.8 72° 3000 3000 3/4 4 1 2.. :45 58 9 80 3000 3000 3/4 3 5 6 8 9 10 Approved: ....:................................ An<-X 1BRIGGS1 Briggs Engineering &Testing PROJECT: Whitehall Estates NOW A Division of PKAssodaMs,Inc PROJ# 82706 INSPECTOR Chad Hancock EMPM 0918 REPORT# DATE: 08/06/98 CODE: D2922 ARRV: 7:30 JOB HRS. 8.0 T.T: MILEAGE: TEMP.: 65-85F WIND: Low HUMID: High (SUNNY) CLOUDY NO OF PAGES TO THIS REPORT: 1 of 2 NO.OF BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 1 I Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1551 and/or D-698. s Location: Inside wall of Wing #4 I S3 l i Remarks: Arrived at the above named project site as the client requested in order to conduct a Soils Inspection. I Compaction testing could not be conducted on the inside of the wall l due to mixing of material. i i Sample was obtained earlier this week for laboratory analysis and results will be available by tomorrow morning. i i Super, Nick Fitzgerald, was notified of all findings. ' 13k F i I Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: I 3 a I i ?::::::::::iii:4 i':i::i::::::i::::: ....................................: ..•k, .................................................. .••:::: !!!77 ;:}:i:;:;:} .?Y::}ji::�?:R:::i:::<_::t}:iii:vi'iiBRIGGS Briggs Engineering &Testing PROJECT: White �—� A Division of PK Associates,Inc PROJ#: 82706 WSPECTOR: Chad Hancock EMPM 0918 REPORT# DATE: 08/13/98 CODE: D2922 ARRV: 8:00 JOB HRS. 7.0 T.T: MILEAGE: TEMP.: 40-60F WIND: Low HUMID: High (SUNNY) CLOUDY NO OF PAGES TO THIS REPORT: 1 of 2 NO.OF BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 1 Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at,optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D-698. Location: West wall of Wing #5 and south end of elevator pit. Remarks: Arrived at the above named project site as the client requested in order to conduct a Soils Inspection. Five compaction tests were conducted in the areas as noted on the attached report. All tests met and or exceeded the.minimum compaction requirement of 95%. Super, Nick Fitzgerald, was notified of findings. I a I Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: j E i i 1 i r. Soils Compaction Report. .BRIOSS Briggs ggs Engineering & Testing A Division of PK Associates, Inc. . PROJECT : T-�7o6 _ QVSPECfOR: EMP.i: )!� REPORT#., DATE: ARR.TOME: y-!pC) JOB HRS-- T.T.: GE TEMP.: . O' L -1O' WIND: H © HUMID.: ® L U CLOUDY Maximum Dry Dens' , f � 6 1 Optimum Moisture Content: Method of Testing ( Check One) : 8and Cone Nuclear Densometer Tesl Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req.Min. Moisture optimum No. Area Tested %Com . % Com . Content Moisture % / L✓' ��l Soo r E1e. Q S. 9 S o 7. 02 7, 1 3 t l L i t ► 4 .PL S 4, 7 LL I -T I Tests not meeting re uirements: 4Z-1 Who notified: RecommendationsL. _C-o..,. ,,, Remarks: Technician: proved f ............................ No .... .................................. BRIGGS Briggs Engineering &Testing PROJECT: Whitehall Estates A Division of PK Associates,Inc PROJ#: 82706 NSPECTOR Chad Hancock 1 EMP#: 0918 REPORT# DATE: 08/21/98 CODE: D2922 1i ARRV: 7:30 JOB HRS. 8.0 T.T: MILEAGE: TEMP.: 65-90F WIND: Low HUMID: Medium SUNNY) CLOUDY NO OF PAGES TO THIS REPORT: 1 of 2 NO.OF BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 1 Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D-698. Location: Main entrance of building, Wings #5, 3 and 1 Remarks: Arrived at the above named project site as the client requested in order to conduct a Soils Inspection. Twenty one compaction tests were conducted in the areas as noted on the attached report. All tests met and or exceeded the minimum compaction requirement of 95%. Notified super, John Feene, of all findings and test results. I For further details, please see the attached report. a 1 I Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: Solis Compaction Report Zah, Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT- � ��,/ ,i BRIG�s�� w A Disvision of PK Assoc. Inc. PROJECT#: INSPECTOR: EMP&. REPORT#- DATE: CODE- D2922 ARR.TIME: ,130 JOB HRS.: g' T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: 5,9 WIND: H M HUMID.: Hdo L CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: 6 Optimum Moisture Content: `7. Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone: Nuclear Densometer: Test Location // Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum .5 Area No. Coln Footl s: Tested /o Comp. /o Comp. Content % Moisture Geri` 9s% s, L � 27,0 :5 � G✓i' �vcal- oZ 5, 6 4- .ia 0 G, s, 1 s 6o E-h qr , t ` 2917 3� C� Ca (/C/ ! IV Tests not sting requirements: Who Notified: O tJ Recommendations: Remarks: Technician: proved: i 1 BRIGGB Briggs Engineering &Testing PROJECT: Whitehall Estates A Division of PKAssociates,Ina PROD#: 82706 M SPECTOR Chad Hancock EMP#: 0918 REPORT# DATE: 09/08/98 CODE: D2922 ARRV: 8:00 JOB HRS. T.T: MILEAGE TEMP.: 55/70 F WIND: Low HUMID: High SUNNY RAIN NO OF PAGES TO THIS REPORT: 1 of 1 NO.OF BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 0 Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D-698. Location: Remarks: Arrived at the above named project site as the client reQUested in order to conduct a Soils Inspection. Upon arrival, I was informed that compaction would not take place this date due to heavy rain. Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: v} b V OCT I f � � E � BAIGGS Briggs Engineering &Testing PROJECT: Whitehall Estates A Ofvrsion o,PKAssodates,ft PROJ go?70� #: WSPECTOFt Chad Hancock EMP#: 0918 REPORT# DATE: 09/04/98 CODE: D2922 ARRV: 7:00 JOB HRS. 4.0 T.T: MILEAGE.- TEMP.: 70-90F WIND: Low HUN9D: High (SUNNY)- CLOUDY NO OF PAGES TO THIS REPORT: 1 of 2 NO.OF BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 1 Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D-698. Location: Backfill of entire section of Wing #2 and south half of Wing #4. Remarks: Arrived at the above named project site as the client requested in order to conduct a Soils Inspection. Lifts were placed in accordance with job specifications. Eleven compaction tests were conducted in the areas as noted on the attached report. All tests met and or exceeded the minimum compaction requirement of 95% Informed John Feeney of all test results. For further details, please see the attached report. Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: Soils Compaction Report 1 BRIGGS Bri PROJECT: ggs Engineering & Testing A Disvision of PK Assoc. Inc. PROJECT# �oZ70 INSPECTOR:e EMPj: REPORT#. DATE: CODE: D2922 ARR.TIME: 7; JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE- TEMP.:7<>1— WIND: H M <3> HUMID.: M L CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: / Optimum Moisture Content: 5, Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone: Nuclear Densometer. Tesl Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum Area No. Tested %Comp. %Comp. Content % Moisture % a 3 4,4 70 S, /22 C Tests not meeting requirements: Who Notified: t Recommendations: Remarks: Technician: Approved: f Y� � "R 1 3 Soils Inspection Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: BRIGG WHITEHALL ESTATES S A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Ken Oliver EMP: 209 REPORT#: DATE: 9/18/98 CODE: S26 ARR. TIME: 8:30 am JOB HRS.: 7 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP: 75F WIND: H L X HUMID: LOW SUNNY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. Location: All tests were performed on southwest wing (wing #5). Please see attached sketch for approximate locations. All tests were performed on slab backfill. The final lift was approximately 6-8" to bring to elevation 62.66 which represents bottom of slab elevation. Remarks: The crew had wet the entire southwest wing (wing #5) prior to my arrival. They were also placing the final lift of material to bring to bottom of slab elevation over entire wing- Once compacted and tested they would excavate haunces. The results of testing on attached data sheet. All tests passed. n Technician: KOliver e O a Approved Soils Compaction Report � Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: ,'IA;4%fs� r BRIGGS ANwrif �— A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82 70& INSPECTOR: ,e. o1z;, x EMP.#: ao REPORT#: DATE: f /a CODE: (o ARR.TIME :,Jaoco., JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L 7s0.c WIND: H (V HUMID.: H m CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: Z. ctrr✓c tiet f// Optimum Moisture Content: S 8 Method of Testing ( Check One) Sand Cone Nuclear Densometer Test Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum No. �/46 //- a`✓w/L%/f Area Tested :;CS14,6 %Comp. % Com . Content % Moisture % f ot/��L✓E3'>< i.,i /�✓ '�.� A�SFt GZ• Gfi ��• 7 /Swo S•'�' SBA �I Z RoXi S 74 ,4 Alw4ecl' ��• 9 S 7 6. 7S. o 8 98. z. y � 99. 9 Tests not meeting requirements: /Vlvwf-.rl Who noted: V15Aw Recommendations: Remarks: �.��.c. 1.�'>1 E��is C� /oR�.r. �`r� T.iG.�.r ..✓ Technician: Approved Q / x �� irtis d S,,,o�ino-r ft 1 ��wlXoyddb 1 � s�oN� i f Soils Inspection Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES BRIGGS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Wayne Carbonneau EMP.#: REPORT#: DATE: 9/17/98 CODE: S26 ARR.TIME: 8:00 AM JOB HRS: 4 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H 65F WIND: H L X HUMID.: H L X SUNNY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. Location: Wing #5 Remarks: Due to the work being conducted in other areas compaction had not taken place by 12:00 pm. Another Briggs Inspector, Ken Oliver, covered the second half of the day. Please see his report for further information. Technician: Wayne Carbonneau Approved t� Soils Inspection BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Ken Oliver EMP: 209 REPORT#: DATE: 9/17/98 CODE: S26 ARR. TIME: 12:15 pm JOB HRS.: 3 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP: 80F WIND: H L X HUMID: LOW SUNNY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. Location: All tests were performed on the southwest wing (wing #5). Please see attached sketch for approximate locations. All tests were performed on slab backfill. Final lift was approximately 6-8" to bring elevation to 62.66 which represents bottom of slab elevation. Remarks: 1 arrived on site at 12:15 pm to relieve another Briggs inspector. Upon my arrival approximately 30% of the southwest wing had been backfilled with structural fill to bottom of finished floor elevation. The crew was continuing to backfill and compact using a plate compactor and vibratory roller. I tested the areas that had been completed. All tests failed as the soil was too dry to compact. It was agreed the crew would wet and recompact tomorrow. Technician: Ken Oliver Approved tiY <00 Oti '10C�4 My 100> Ft�[ ,�v�«ixoyddd s�oN ad c. Soils Inspection Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES BRIGGNZES A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 h INSPECTOR: David Geisser EMP: 412 REPORT#: DATE: 9/16/98 CODE: S26 ARR. TIME: 7:15 am JOB HRS.: 2 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP: 70F WIND: H L X HUMID: high CLOUDY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. Location: Soil compaction tests #1 and #2 were performed on previously compacted fill on the northeast part of the building area. Please refer to the attached sketch for locations. Remarks: The compaction met the required 95% minimum. The superintendent was notified of all results. Technician: David Geisser Approved M M 1 v Soils Compaction Report BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJEG?c ( �—t A Division of PK Associates, Inc. 1PROJECr#.- —, NSPEcro� C� SS EMP#. `1 1 Z REPORT# DATE — (o—9 CODE ARR.TINE tJ'� } JOB HRS.: T.T.: CAM TEMP.: H')I) L WIND: H HUMID.: L SUNNY UDY Maximum Dry Density: 3 3 . Optimum Moisture Content: i Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone Nuclear Densometer Tes Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum No. Area Test %Com . % COMP. Content Moisture % 6r P ts not meetin r uirements: ►`/G '' ce Who notified: LAommendations: ? �'�^. U c Remarks: Technician: Approved Y f - r ��aotZ 5`gi3 ' -J l T o! N LOCATION PLAN NOTES PROPOSED WHITEHALL ESTATE - HYANNIS, MA LOCATIONS ARE �, :1 BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING APPROXIMATE. BRIGG5 100 WEYMOUTH STREET, UNIT B1 `'==J ROCKLAND, MASSACHUSETTS DR. BY: DWG SCALE: 1"=40' +/- PROD. NO: 82706 'D BY: PMS DATE: FIGURE NO. 1 Soils Inspection Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: W H CTrzHALL �STi-TES f-{Y/S.N l BRIGGS N 5 A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#- 82-7Olo MPECTOR: 6 . R EYN O L015 EMP.#: REPORT#: DATE: 9 /15 /9 8 CODE: ARR.TIME: -1 A 5 JOB HRS.: T.T.: 2 (n r MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L 840 WIND: HO L HUMID.: HQ L SUNNY CLOUDY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. Location: MA3 -LCLcicg .� 6 r c o <A on 4e--- nal (.4 __kc vcu m u c� 4;n4 MUM Remarks: yy r r' 2 „ 3 , Technician: MIA Approved �r+ Sods Compaction ReMIN port BRIOGS Briggs Engineering dt Testing SECT-- W 1-IIT7CHAL-L- ES-cA-ms f t-(YAWN1'3 A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 8'Z-70< MSPECfOR: 6 . R.E Y N O L O 5 EMP.#: REPORT#. DATE: Q /l5 !48 CODE ARR.TIME 7-4 15 JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L $Q ' WIND: © L HUMID.: HQ L SUNNY CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: 132 . Optimum Moisture Content: 5'. 8 Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone Nuclear Densometer ✓' Tes Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum No. Area Tested %Como. % Como. Content Moisture % 4 - S. 95 4 •z. 5, g ZULno .4 << �� q . 3 3.9 ,4 5 4. - " '` 95. l 4.4 4 . �. � 4.1 qS. 5.2 �� �.Z4.7 46 842 Tests not meeting requirements: lk 2. Who notified: Jokn Fccc► Recommendations: ccomrcn- Remarks: Technician: Approved ..I' , 14 CONCRETE PLACEMENT INSPECTION BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Wayne Carbonneau ARR.TIME: 7:00 am JOB HRS.: 6.5 DATE: 9/1 4/9 8 CODE: C26 TEMP.: H 178 F WIND.: H L X HUMID.: H L X PARTLY C X CLOUDY Concrete Source: Cape Cod Ready Mix General Contractor: Congress Construction Stora a Location: Curing Box: Other: Inspection completed as per ACI-301 and Contract Documents. A checklist of major items is presented. All items in non-conformance are either corrected during inspection or noted herein. Detailed inspection of reinforcing for size, quantity, grade, spacing and configuration is reported separately when performed. Preplacement: Weather X Steel arrangement X Temp. X Steel clearance X Forms for general requirements. X Steel cleanliness X Grade preparation X Steel supports X Placement: Concrete placed within limits of ASTM C-94 and Contract Documents. Non-compliance items are either corrected before placement or noted herein. Concrete.sampled in accordance with ASTM C-172. ASTM C-94 Limits ASTM C-94 Limits Time Limits X 1-1/2 hrs. max. Temperature X 50-90° F Slump - 4 " max. Mixing N/A 70-300 Rev. Air content N/A - % Density N/A ± 3 p.c.f. Location: slab on grade wings 2 and 3 Remarks: John Feeney, project superintendent, was notified of all results. 'The slump on load #4 exceeded slump limit. Cylinders were made from this load. John was notified of slump. No air tests were necessary per John Feeney. Method of placement: Chute X Pump X Other Load Arr. Truck No. of Mix Conc. Slump Air Air Conc. Conc. CA Cyl. Set Gals. Unit No. Time No. Yds. (%) Temp. Strength Strength Size Fabr. # added Weight min. °F °F Deliv. Required water cf 1 7:08 58 11 75 57F 3000 3000 3/4 15 2 7:15 55 11 70 3000 3000 3/4 15 3 7:35 54 11 70 3000 3000 3/4 10 4 7:35 51 11 65 72F 4.25 58F 3000 3000 3/4 4 1 15 5 7:45 62 11 70 300.0 3000 3/4 20 6 8:00 56 11 75 3000 3000 3/4 20 7 8:05 59 11 75 3000 3000 3/4 15 8 8:20 161 11 65 70F 4 62F 3000 3000 3/4 4 2 15 9 8:35 58 11 70 3000 3000 3/4 20 10 8:55 88 11 170 3000 3000 3/ 1 5F OF Approved: '�11 r - Concrete Truck Delivery ( cont.) B..AIZ h,R GS Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES � A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Wayne Carbonneau EMP.#: REPORT#: DATE: 9/1 4/9 8 CODE: C26 ARR.TIME: 7:00 am JOB HRS.: 6.5 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L 78F WIND: H IL X HUMID.: H L X PARTLY CLOUDY The following record is of the trucks that arrived at the project site. Control tests of slump, air conten density and temperature were completed as often as necessary to insure that the specification limits were not exceeded and to insure uniformity from load. Load Arr. Truck No. Mix Conc. Slump Air Air Concrete Concrete CA Cyl. Set Gallons Ut No. Time No. Yards Duration Temp. (in.) (%) Temp. Strength Strength Size Fabr # added Wei (min.) °F (F°) Deliv. Required (Water) (pc 11 9:02 55 11 65 1 67F 3000 3000 3/4 15 Location 12 9:15 54 11 65 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 1 20 Location 1 .3 9:23 162 1 1 60 72F 3.75 67F 3000 3000 3/4 4 3 20 Location 14 9:30 56 11 60 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 1 20 Location 15 9:45 87 11 60 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 1 15 Location 16 9:53 15 9 11 65 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 20 Location 1 7 10:07 58 1 1 55 73F 3.75 70F 3000 3000 3/4 4 4 20 Location 18 10:25 8 g 1 1 160 3000 3000 3/4 1 5 Location 19 10:31 55 1 11 50 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 1 15 Location 20 10:44 54 1 1 60 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 1 1 5 Location 21 10.49 62 1 1 60 73F 3.5 72F 3000 3000 3/4 4 5 1 5 Location 22 10:58 56 1 1 55 1 1 1 3000 3000 3%4 20 Location Approved: i Concrete Truck Delivery ( cont.) Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES BRIGGS A Division.of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Wayne Carbonneau EMP.#: REPORT#: DATE: 9/1 4/9 8 CODE: C26 ARR.TIME: 7:00 am JOB HRS.: 6.5 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L 78F WIND: H IL X HUMID.: H L X PARTLY CLOUDY The following record is of the trucks that arrived at the project site. Control tests of slump, air content density and temperature were completed as often as necessary to insure that the specification limits were not exceeded and to insure uniformity from load. Load Arr. Truck No. Mix Conc. Slump Air Air Concrete Concrete CA Cyl. Set Gallons Unit No. Time No. Yards Duration Temp. (in.) (%) Temp. Strength Strength Size Fabr # added Weight (min.) °F (F°) Deliv. Required (Water) (pcf) 23 11 :25 59 11 55 3000 3000 3/4 20 Location 24 .11 :40 58 11 85 1 1 1 75F 3000 3000 3/4 1 15 Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Approved: r Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 E7;s. PROJECT:Briggs Engineering & Testing A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: q2 Date: Client: ay�ks; e. 0 jwinc syl Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Location: 14)i/7 p � ,r,�t, C,) Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. 1 1.4 Ticket No.: 132 Batch Time: 0 Fine Aqqregate lbs. 11� Strength Delivered: 3000 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength-Required: 30co Water Gals. Set No.: C Time of Test: Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: 5 Load #.: 7, Air Entraining oz. Number of CA Size: 31y- Other oz. Slump Air Content 50 0 ASTM C-143 /`I ASTM C-231/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: �p Air Temp.: - ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 IJ� G Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: producer are.both responsible Concrete Source: M Gals. for added water as per ASTM_ 70_ _01 S General Contractor naeer n st� c ' C-94. Discharge time limit 00 �35 Storage Location:.)�MJO P/&e,,nen fmin. max. 90 min. or 300 revolutions. Curing Box: Curing Temp. F° CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C,31 and 0-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Weight Pcf Unit We ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max.Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test (in.) in. . (so. in.) pcf LBS. Strength PSI (ASTM C-39) 7P O ,Z.66 11. 6 11q,Il b qa fe D r l fl Approved: L -. r Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: BRIGGs A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#. la2 Date• 2g-9-�, Client: fi Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Location: twin lvq 11 Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. Ticket No.: Batch Time: J 2 Fine Aqqregate lbs. Strength Delivered: 3600 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: OC> Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: �� Load #.: J- Air Entrainino oz. 17 Number of C.A. Size: - Other oz. Slump jam`` Air Content ASTM C-143 / ASTM C-2311C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: -7 Air Temp.: ��• ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 Remarks: Contractor and By whom r 906 $i'ip✓� producer are both responsible U; S Concrete Source: Ci4 f for added water as per ASTM of General Contractor �r 30 C-94. Discharge time.limit. StStorage Location:�l1C'i91e 1 n,1 min.; max. 90 min..or 300 revolutions. SS Curing Box Curing Temp. P- CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C, I and C 28 DayAir Dry Unit Wei ht: pcf Unit Weli iht As Received: cf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested I at test in. in. . in: cf,. LBS. St renath PSI ASTM C-391 3 A 8 y(q4 '7r)#q 6, 60'' 17-06 ag. Iq 2. q: 715 a,g50 8 �aS zs' 1 N2 A loev.135 3 760 D 3 C S 7-8r iLl Z.( Io9 z2I 3 �0 17 1,43, 0 11 0 2 00 C. Approved: I a w Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: , C�a C� 654-h-s BRIGGS c5:00Y A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: Fa Date:Client: �, c Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: a4 Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. Ticket No.: / 46 Batch Time: Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: Uc� Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3v Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: Water Reducina oz. Truck No.: •j Load #.: ) Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: C.A. Size: 51,1 Other oz. Slump: Air Content: ASTM C-143 ! ASTM C-231/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.:,,,,,e Air Temp.: 7 o c) ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 7 Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: Goa producer are both responsible (70 5 1 0 1 Concrete Source: CG Cco� ccdt ' for adlded water as per ASTM Gals. F4 General Contractor:. o� r 4f water 5C 94 Discharge time limit added 30Stora a Location: o�. `90 mins. or 300 revolutions. 8 35 ,G mi max. 40 JD 4 Curing Box: wA Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 Dav Air Dry Unit Wei ht: Unit Wei ht As Received: Pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested -at test in. in. s . in. Pcf LBS. Strength PSI ASTM C-39 A 113lf 7 6 " 1 2" 28.3 /y7, �Z, '7(0 02�, ;Z&qO B q131fr 28 6 " 12" 28.3 11-12 . / 9 00 C q 3 jr 28 6 " 1 2" 28.3 'y , 41 2 4 7, S\0 D 31 t 28 6 " 1 2" 28.3 J412 5 3 E56ALL 37S Approved: �f. (�p� �����)ing Soils Inspection �` Briggs Engmeerin ACT. WHITEHALL ESTATES/HYANNIS BCIGGS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 9WECTOR. Chad Hancock. EMP.#. 918 REPORT#: DATE: 8/24/98 CODE S26 ARR.TIME: 7:30 am JOB HRS.: 5 T.T.: MILEAGE r TEMP.: H 900 L WIND: H L X HUMID.: H X L SUNNYXXGLOUDY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. Location: Wing 1 and 3 Remarks: The area for the water main was being excavated upon my .ar:rival . Compaction tests were taken when the area was ready. I informed the superintendent_ of all results. Technician: Chad Hancock Approved r r Solis Compaction Report Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: �� BRIGGS PROJECT#: �� 06 v v A Disvision of PK Assoc. Inc. -� CG,ao/ INSPECTOR: EMP.#: 9� REPORT#: DATE: CODE: D 22 ARR.TIME: 3o JOB HRS.: j T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: WIND: H M U HUMID.: L < CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: / Rt Optimum Moisture Content: / Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone: Nuclear Densometer: Test Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum Area No. Column Footings: Tested %Comp. %Comp. Content % Moisture % - I ,0 -� 9-5,a - ! 3 3 1 00 ;2, 95, 7 Tests not meeting requirements: Who Notified: Recommendations: e. ` L.� M - Remarks: r P Technician: Approved: j Soils Inspection Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES/HYANNIS BRIGGS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 WSPECTOR Chad Hancock EMP.#: 918 REPOFrr#. DATE: 9/1/9 8 CODE S 2 6 ARR.TIME 7:30 am JOB HRS.: 8 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H 901 L 65° WIND: H L X HUMID.: H X L SUNNY X CLOUDY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. Location: Elevations for slab in wing 2..: Backfill for pipe trenches wings 1 and 3. Remarks: I informed John Feeney of all results. Lifts were applied in accordance with specifications. Technician: Chad Hancock Approved I ' Solis Compaction Report PROJECT: BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing ���.. A Disvision of PK Assoc. Inc. PROJECT#: �oZ INSPECTOR: ce, EMP.#: REPORT#: DATE: 9 CODE: D2922 ARR.TIME: -7,3o JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: 6 9ao WIND: H M HUMID.: H®L <SU CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: / 6 Optimum Moisture Content: I Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone: Nuclear Densometer: Test Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum Area No. Column Footings: Tested %comp. %Comp. Content % Moisture % i L,; 3soT 9 7, 1 95 Z 1 Sj6 9 7. 3 9 7 Af f i 6, 3 T-1g- � a </,6 5 , 3, 6 3 I6, } , S l Tests not meeting requirements: lWho Notified: v� t'CG✓le Recommendations: ,^ 44 ; Remarks: .. �-- Jv ✓� cev� . �. Technician: Approved: Soils Inspection BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT. WHITEHALL ESTATES/HYANNIS �� A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR. Chad Hancock EMP.#: 918 REPORT#: DATE: 9/2/9 8 CODE S 2 6 ARR.TIME: 7:30 am JOB HRS.: 4 T.T.: MILEAGE + TEMP.: H 900 L 65' WIND: H L X HUMID.: H X L SUNNY XCLOUDY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. Location: Backfill for slab wings 1, 2 and- 3 Remarks: I informed John Feeney of all results. Lifts were placed in accordance with specifications. Technician: Chad Hancock Approved r r Solis Compaction Report Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: eRIGGs A Disvision of PK Assoc. Inc. PROJECTM '9�Z 7C26 INSPECTOR: EMP.#: �' REPORT#: DATE: �� CODE: D2922 ARR.TIME: r JOB HRS.: / T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: fir„ �c WIND: H M �� HUMID.: L CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: / 7 Optimum Moisture Content: Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone: Nuclear Densometer: Test Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum Area No. Column Footings: Tested %Comp. %Comp. Content % Moisture % g;a 3 �T 7, 7 s o F6, '7 6 Ll A10 Se 7 7 , , , c/,�. / q J'V ?7, 6 Tests not meeting requirements: o,� Who Notified: Recommendations: ,� Q 1. ,��•..� Remarks: Technician: Approved: Zr Soils Inspection �a OW N Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: �i�t �� �s 1tl 4-1.1'ovi'r 13RIGGS J0270G A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: INSPECTOR: ,4: &7/I/EAp =MP.#: .,20 y REPORT#: DATE: CODE G ARR.TIME: 4?-•00 s*w*. JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE TEMP.: H L PO•F' WIND: H HUMID.: ® L 9(Sp . CLOUDY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. / Location: ���E �iE� S�t'�G� 1 T C,oI�I��y✓f= f.3�1 � � � �O.�N�✓ av✓CS7�i�uc�r./ea '/ �iv./ /. Sd 6 tir✓ ��v.✓ i a.✓ �v� 00 Remarks: � /1-•cv �o/�-� G.w�l GCrFi� ��,/�••c� Technician: - Approved Soils Compaction Report ••Iu PROJECT ei - BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing L✓��/F ���+ �,,,,,,,,,;r A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82 704 INSPECTOR: EMP.#: �O REPORT#: DATE: ,3 CODE ARR.TIME: .oo pp^ JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L WIND: H HUMID.: g L CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: / 2 . 2 1e-r>w-cr1M lf-/I /20• O timum Moisture Content: Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone Nuclear Densometer Test Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum No. Area Tested %Comp. % Como., Content '/ Moisture G'E7V �EC�io.�/ Soo rr SD 97 el. S 8 • 2 L'C� .S'tz/io.✓ Scams s- / .SB '9(V 3 Cewla- - Per-he>•✓ scb sc 4/ SIP 97• / . Z 4 s- cf v-/Arxr/ Sav Si 62• 04 3 sbosoa 490 7 X Fou 201A n+sf S a S-r 62. O 98• to c� 7 Ts� VK Tests not meeting requirements: Who notified: �PcX.rd/ �.! m•✓E Recommendations: li✓E/ Cfo,/ 1, �e ,� C.�.,,s,.c��c< CPA- Remarks: %a �io.,i ,i ✓ �3. av , Technician: Approved 44141 N g-/S s ff1 S� �6 /S-A s x �f yk+lxovdd b L� S3fON�Q X S�j✓ n' '��f�-YS n n nn i D 5 h Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 r.� Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT:� ��,�y��� BRIOOS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: �Z Date:�_�y_yq '<—OV Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: Mix proportions a (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. tvt- Ticket No.: Batch Time: ko:Zc Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: 3000 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3<=0 Water Gals.7-- Set No.: S Time of Test: \cts5 Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: toZ Load #.: z\ Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: y C.A. Size: Sty Other oz. Slump: Air Content: t.3kp ASTM C-143 3 L ASTM C-123/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 -1 -12� Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: o _ producer are both responsible $5 1 Concrete Source: Cac? Reed for added:water as per ASTM 5 Gals • ell General Contractor: 70. of wa# r C-94. Discharge time limit; 5 added Storage Location: 30 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. . 60 35 min. max. 50 4 Curing Box: ( } Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Weight: I Unit Weight As Received: Pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test in. in. (sq. in. cf LBS. Strength PSI (ASTM C-39) A , 7 6 " 12" 28.3 07 9 02 5, B CJ 28 6 " 12" 28.3 kIn C 28 6 " 12" 28.3 D _ . _ 2.8 6 " 12" 28.3 / Approved: Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 'fie` Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: BRIOOS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#- $Z--1Oe Date: Client: Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: W,rs, 3 Mix proportions 3h (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. O 9Q-ANT Ticket No.: Batch Time: `I,-%s Fine Aggregate lbs. ct4 Strength Delivered: 3 a o Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 30c,,=> Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: -1tyo Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: S% Load #.: `-1 Air Entraining oz. Number of C l.: Uk C.A. Size: 3/ Other oz. Slump: Air Content: mjpA ASTM C-143 yy ASTM C-123/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: $$o ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 ,Zo Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: producer are both responsible $7added Concrete Source: Cr• C�for added water as per ASTM 5General Contractor:( 5 C-94. Discharge time limit 50 Stora a Location: 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. 60 min. max. Curing Box: ( ) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Weigh Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test in. in. (sq. in. cf LBS. Strength PSI (ASTM C-39) A 9 - 7 6 " 1 2" 28.3 /4/0, 14 b 1,77(, c� /90 B C� �� 28 6 " 12" 28.3 / , C 28 6 " 12" 28.3 lqo, D 28 6 " 12 28.3 lqo Approved: I Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 ZILLON Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: BRIOOS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: $Z1o� Date: Client: Qoc�-sale c- Cement Brand.or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: t-z%r,4 3 Mix proportions '2> 0 31 (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. tilo PL-ANJT' Ticket No.: Batch Time: Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: 3000 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3000 Water Gals. Set No.:, 2 Time of.Test: $�.3Z Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: lob Load #.: Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: C.A. Size: 31 Other oz. Slump: Air Content: t.3Eq ASTM C-143 �, ASTM C-123/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp:: o ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 'l0 6Z Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: C producer are both responsible 10 Concrete Source:C C,od t`v1i for added water as per ASTM 5 Gals. 20 General Contractor: 70 of wat¢r 25 C-94. Discharge time limit 5 added �0 Storage Location: 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. W55 min. max. Curing Box: ( ) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Wei h lUnit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested lat test in. in. (sq. in. cf LBS. Strength PSI (ASTM C-39) A 9 ! 7 6 " 12" 28.3 q0, / B 28 6 " 12" 28.3 1410.5 C 28 6 " 12" 28.3 D 28 6 " 12" 28.3 / 9. Approved: Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 .ILLS PROJECT: BRA©G$ Briggs Engineering & Testing A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: Client: por'�S.�Ses�:c� Se�v,ue Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: Mix proportions 3000 31 (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. \JO PL.FNKyr Ticket No.: \'18$ Batch Time: :S Fine Aggregate lbs. ZN,S o,J Strength Delivered: Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3000 Water Gals. Set No. Time of Test: Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: toZ Load #.: VS Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: C.A. Size: 3� Other oz. Slump: Air Content: ASTM C-143 3 ASTM C-123/C-173 Field Unit Weight • pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: 1Z Air Temp.: b,o ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: C producer are both responsible s m 5 101 Concrete Source: for added water as per ASTM 5 Gals• General Contractor: 70 of wat C-94. Discharge time limit added Storage Location:f`1e 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. 60 35 min. max. 40 55 4 Curing Box: ( ) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Weigh : Unit Weight As Received: Pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested lat test in. in. (sq. in.) I pcf LBS. Strength PSI ASTM C-39) A 9. 7 6 " 12" 28.3 l a 0 67IQ9p?. 3 B 28 6 " 12" 28.3 C 28 6 " 12" 28.3 , D 28 6 " 12" 28.3 Approved: I f , Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT:� ,kta\ BRIOOS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#-j2,o,- Date:1<0V . Client: pc.r�cs:c�c Ser;oc Sec-.J:caeS Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: at Z Mix proportions 3Evo 3c (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. 1J0 PLCRcv Ticket No.: \- ` -3 Batch Time: 0\�yS Fine Aggregate lbs. -Ztas a,J Strength Delivered: 3000 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: hoc Water Gals. Set No.: %A Time of Test: Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: SZ Load Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: V C.A. Size: 3t Other oz. Slump: 3 Air Content: Nt�, ASTM C-143 3 ASTM C-123/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: ASTM C-138 I ASTM C-1064 "11 a 10` Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: c' o producer are both responsible (of 5 QO 5 10 Concrete Source: Cfld 9 for added water as per ASTM Gals. General Contractor: wate 2 5 C-94. Discharge time limit adde Stora a Location: 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. min. max. 554; Curing Box: ( ) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Weigh Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test in. in. (sq. in. cf LBS. Strength PSI (ASTM C-39) Q A 7 6 " 12" 28.3 j JJQ c2590 B , �� 28 6 " 12" 28.3 / . 3 C 28 6 " 12" 28.3 139, D 28 6 " 12" 28.3 Q Approved: D1`vJ����t/��/����\\\\� Concret Cylinder Test Result CF-11 '73 11 ',J Zalh _it BRIBriggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: OOS <0V A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: '8Z1o� Date:N_\y__q . Client: Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: �� Z Mix proportions 31 (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. Nr Ticket No.: Batch Time: \e:zn Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: 3000 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3000 Water Gals. Set No.: S Time of Test: wxs-s Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: 1pZ Load #.: Z-\ Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: y C.A. Size: S14 Other oz. Slump: Air Content: ASTM C-143 Z. ASTM C-123/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 13'0 17- Remarks Contractor and By whom prepared: producer are both responsible 10 Concrete Source: Cow? R+zo d (W. for added water as per ASTM Gal 20 General Contractor. a vat r 5 C-94.� 'Discharge time limit .70 added Storage Location: 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. 60 35 min. max. 504 Curing Box: ( ) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Weight: Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specime. Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test in. in. .(sq. in. cf' LBS. Strength PSI ASTM C-39 A 7 6 1211 28.3 B - 28 6 " 1 2" 28.3 Q 79� 3 9 0 C 28 6 " 12" 28.3 ,-41 113 $76 'y 030 D 28 6 " 127.:.. . 28.3. / / 3 3 930 D" Approved: f Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 ZaN Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT:I BRIOOS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#:- Z1o� Date: Client: pc.�ks:ac sevicrSec-.►:c+e5 Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: Mix proportions 2EF,o 3t (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. No PLRcv Ticket No.: \'1g3 Batch Time: 0�%yS Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: 3000 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3i000 Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: S?, Load #.: �7 Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: y C.A. Size: 31 Other oz. Slump: 3 Air Content: Nlp, ASTM C-143 3 ASTM C-123/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf . Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: o ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 1V 1 Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: o producer are both responsiblee Concrete Source:for added water as per ASTM General Contractor: C-94. Discharge time limit Stora a Location:90 mins. or 300 revolutions. min. max. Curing Box: ( ) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Wei ht: Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test . in. in. (sq. in. cf LBS. Strength PSI ASTM C-39 Q A 7 6 " 12" 28.3 j JQ a 5 B 28 6 " 12" 28.3 / • 13 // toqq 13 990 1 C 28 6 " 12" 28.3 / /0 35c� 3 M j___) D 28 6 " 12" 28.3 / 0 ALL T EM CaMF LETED Approved: �- Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 4am BRIGOS Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: � � � IO A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#-$Z-)Oe Date: c,_\A1<0V Client: po�s�dcSet•:o� Sec-�,.�,e, Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: lr ^Q * 3 Mix proportions 3c)c:'o 31 (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. VJO P� Ticket No.: \'1%8 Batch Time: :s Fine Aggregate lbs. Z ,Do Strength Delivered: Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3coo Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: VL Load #.: VS Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: C.A. Size: 3t Other oz. Slump: Air Content: ASTM C-143 3 ASTM C-123/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: C producer are both responsible TIM eS Concrete Source:Co, for added water as per ASTM General Contractor: C-94. Discharge time limit Storage Location: 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. min. max. 934 Curing Box: { ) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Wei ht: Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested lat test in. in. (sq. in. cf ILBS. Strength PSI ASTM C-39 A 9 - 7 6 " 12" 28.3 �, T 1 3 B O,l 28 6 " 12" 28.3 /y rl 2L, lag 3, 050 C 28 6 " 1 2" 28.3 I /01 99 l0 D 28 6 " 1 2" 28.3 jql y 103 0)� 3 50 cOM Approved: Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 �r ��� Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: BRIOOS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#- $Z1ce Date:NE-D, Client: o� Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: 3 Mix proportions '2> 0 3� (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. til0 ?X-A&JT Ticket No.: Batch Time: -1 Fine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: 3000 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3oao Water Gals, Set No.: Z Time of Test: Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: 4A Load #.: Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: C.A. Size: 3I Other oz. Slump: Air Content: N jR ASTM C-143 LV ASTM C-123/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: o ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 -10 62 Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: producer are both responsible 5 10 Concrete Source: Cca for added water as per ASTM 5 Gals•/ 20 General Contractor: 70 of water 25 C-94. Discharge time limit 5 added $4 Storage Location: 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. 60 35 min. max. 55 L1 Curing Box: ( ) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Wei ht: Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density . Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test in. in. (sq. in. cf LBS. Strength PSI (ASTM C-39 A 7 6 " 12" 28.3 i'yo, a aJ� a aao D B 28 6 ° 12" 28.3 Jr /09 3 ��0 C 28 6 " 12" 28.3 /39,J lQ &50 D 28 6 " 12" 28.3 129. eo lQ11 067 3j530 Approved: Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 Z"I"LN Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT:l.�c1��Ho.�� E . e BRIOOS <0V A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: $Z-1oe Date: Client: Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Placement Location: W,„Q 3 Mix proportions ZCOO 31 q (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. VZ3o O"Ac�- Ticket No.: 111l Batch Time: 7:lS Fine Aggregate lbs. C4 Strength Delivered: 3c>0 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: 3000. Water Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: '1:yo Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: S\ Load #.: y Air Entraining oz. Number of C I.: kk C.A. Size: 31 Other oz. Slump: Air Content: NjA ASTM C-143 L `Iy ASTM C-123/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: .�$o ASTM C-138 I ASTM C-1064 '12" Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared: producer are both responsible 10 Concrete Source: Co QoA �� r for added water as per ASTM 5 Gals• General Contractor: �� � of wa er �� C-94. Discharge time limit added 34 Storage Location: 90 mins. or 300 revolutions. 60 35 min. max. 50 Curing Box: ( ) Curing Temp. F. CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DayAir Dry Unit Wei ht: I Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load ' Compressive. Type/Fracture Number Tested at test in. in. (sq. in. cf LBS. Strength PSI ASTM C-39 A 7 6 " 12" 28.3 /t/0, J1 6177 a l90 --,E:) B 28 6 " 12" 28.3 lqo,0 103 (070l 300 C 28 6 " 12" 28.3 / l09 103 3 200 D 28 6 " 12" 28.3 lqo a /0 ay1 -,317&0 14 Approved: ........... Il Gia1GGS Briggs Engineering &Testing PROJECT: Whitehall Estates ADivisiano/PKAss dsms,ft PROS 82706 NSPECTOR: Chad Hancock EMP#: 0 918 REPORT# DATE: 0 9/10/9 8 CODE: ARRV: 7:00 JOB HRS. 8.0 T.T: MILEAGE.- TEMP.: 60-85F WIND: Low HUMD: Medium (SUNNY) CLOUDY NO OF PAGES TO THS REPORT: 1 of 2 NO.OF BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 1 Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D-698. i Location: Wings 3 & 5 Remarks: Arrived at the above named j roec i p t s to as the client requested In order to conduct a Soils Inspection. Lifts were placed in accordance with job specifications. Thirteen compaction tests were conducted in the areas as noted on the attached report. All tests met and or exceeded the minimum compaction requirement of 95%. Mr. John Feeney was notified of all results. For further details, please see the attached report. Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: ' Soils Compectlon Report Briggs Engineering & Testin PROJECT: MRIGGS g 9 9 �✓G- L►a. l -fa A Disvision of PK Assoc. Inc. PROJECT#- INSPECTOR: a EMPj- Cj/Q REPORT#: DATE: (F... e,_c� CODE D2922 ARR.TIME pO JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.:dp� �S+ WIND: H M HUMID.: H®L CLOUDY Ma)dmum Dry Density: OPUMUM Moisture Content: Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone: Nuclear.Densometer. Test Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum Area No. Column Footings: Tested %Comp. %Comp. Content % Moisture % t M. 5, 3 1 Tests not.meeting requirements: p Who Notified: o� Recommendations: a•� Remarks: Technician: Approved: j 'r•{) -.�ti>::ii$:�:4iiii?ii}iii:•:'iii?::'J:•i::..•; •\v'viirji:G:•i:4'{?vv:•:?{niiii:• ....r....:+ pii::i::iL`:•::•ii:?•i%^'•ii:4::ii:ii'isiY•i'•i:•i:?:iiY:}::-.iiii•.:.ii::{j::•: v 11BRIGGS Briggs Engineering &Testing PFiOUECT: Whitehall Estates A Division of PKAssociaw f PROJ#: 82706 j NSPECTOI:t Chad Hancock EMP#: 0918 REPORT# DATE: 09/09/98 CODE: ARRV: 8:00 JOB HRS. T.T: MILEAGE: TEMP.: 55-80 F WIND: Low HURMD: Medium (SUNNY) CLOUDY NO OF PAGES TO THUS REPORT: 1 of 2 NO.OF BACK UP SHEETS TO THIS REPORT: 1 Briggs Engineering and Testing field technicians took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D-698. Location: Wings 1 - 3 Remarks: Arrived at the above named project site as the client requested in order to conduct a Soils Inspection. Lifts were placed in accordance with job specifications. Thirteen compaction tests were conducted in the areas as noted on the attached report. All tests met and or exceeded the minimum compaction requirement of 95%. Mr. John Feeney was notified of all results. For further details, please see the attached report. Technician: Chad Hancock Approved: ] � Soils Compaction Report G,/t LL L GGS Briggs Engineering & Testing ACT: L./ .ECG L C Q + A Disvision of PK Assoc. Inc. PROJECT#: INSPECTOR: C o� EMP.#: REPORT#. DATE: CODE D2922 ARR.TIME g";GO JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.:SS_ g-O" WIND: H M © HUMID.: H dD L CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: Optimum Moisture Content: Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone: Nuclear Densometer. Test Location. Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum Area No. Column Footings: Tested %Comp. %Com . Content % Moisture % I' s 3O S Si Z V dK kdi 6 S. s. 1 6, 3 a j1 q , L, 9d,o �, 3 c Tests not meeting requirements: elf Who Notified: Recommendations: Remarks: o��,.-� _ . Technician: Approved: lie� rp���IVE.DD CONCRETE PLACEMENT INSPECTION �� ■� w BRIGGS Briggs Enain' eerin- & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Dan Connor ARR.TIME: 6:00 am JOB HRS.: 8 DATE: 97 2 5/9 8 CODE: C26 TEMP.: H L WIND.: H L X HUMID.: H L X SUNNY X CLOUDY Concrete Source: Cape Cod Ready Mix General Contractor: Congress Construction Storage Location: Curing Box: Other: by 1st trailer Inspection completed as per ACI-301 and Contract Documents. A checklist of major items is presented. All items in non-conformance are either corrected during inspection or noted herein. Detailed inspection of reinforcing for size, quantity, grade, spacing and configuration is reported separately when performed. Preplacement: Weather X Steel arrangement X Temp. X Steel clearance X Forms for general requirements. X Steel cleanliness X Grade preparation X Steel supports X Placement: Concrete placed within limits of ASTM C-94 and Contract Documents. Non-compliance items are either corrected before placement or noted herein. Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C-172. ASTM C-94 Limits ASTM C-94 Limits Time Limits X 1-1/2 hrs. max. Temperature X 50-90° F Slump * 2 - 4 Mixing N/A 70-300 Rev. Air content 4 - 6 % Density N/A ± 3 p.c.f. Location: ' Please see attached sketch sheet. _.Remarks: .." "Load. 1,5-, 10, 16 and 22 had high air content.. *Load:10, 16 and 22 had high slump. 1 notified John Feeney of high air and slump and he elected to continue placement. Method of placement: Chute Pump X Other Load Arr. Truck No. of Mix Conc. Slump Air Air Conc. Conc. CA Cyl. Set Gals. Unit No. Time No. Yds. Duration Temp. (in.) (%) Temp. Strength Strength Size Fabr. # added Weight min. °F °F Deliv. Required water cf 1 6:51 58 11 45 65F 3.25 6.4 54F 3000 3000 3/4 4 1 40 2 6:55 55 11 45 3000 3000 3/4 3 7:00 88 _. .1 1 - _ 45 3000 3000 3/4 4 7:15 62 "11` .45 3000 3000- 3/.4 __.. - ... 5 7:20 57 11 45 69F 3.25 7.2 59F 3-000 " "3000 3/4 4 - .2 6 ' 7.30 59 11 4:5 3000 3000.._... 3/4..... 6.0..:, .. __.. .. .. 7 7:55 53' ` 1 1 55 3000 3000 3/4 8 7:55 51 11 60 3000 3000 3/4 9 8:05 56 11 50 3000 3000 3/4 35 10 8:19 158 111 145 73F 16 6.9 169F 13000 13000 3/4 Approved: r t� Tj Concrete Truck Delivery ( cont.) Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: WHITEHALL ESTATES BRIGGS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 1<QV- INSPECTOR: Dan O'Connor EMP.#: REPORT#: DATE: 9/2 5/9 8 CODE: C26 ARR.TIME: 6:00 am JOB HRS.: 8 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L WIND: h LOW HUMID.: H L X SUNNY The following record is of the trucks that arrived at the project site. Control tests of slump, air content density and temperature were completed as often as necessary to insure that the specification limits were not exceeded and to insure uniformity from load. Load Arr. Truck No. Mix Conc. Slump Air Air Concrete Concrete CA Cyl. Set Gallons Unit No. Time No. Yards Duration Temp. (in.) (%) Temp. Strength Strength Size Fabr # added Weight (min.) °F (F°) Deliv. Required (Water) (pcf) 11 8:25 55 11 45 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 Location 12 845 52 11 50 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 1 50 Location 13 8.50 57 11 50 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 Location 14 8:55 59 11 50 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 Location 15 855 88 11 50 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 Location 1 6 9:35 53 1 1 55 73F 7.25 7.2 69F 3000 3000 3/4 4 4 125 Location 17 9:30 51 11 55 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 Location 18 9:45 56 1 11 65 3000 3000 3/4 Location 19 9:50 62 1 11 65 1 3000 3000 3/4 Location 20 10:3 57 1 11 60 1 1 1 1 3000 3000 3/4 Location 21 10:4 1 59 1 70 3000 3000 3/4 1 40 Location 22 11 :1 53 1 1 70 74F 7.25 6.5 82F 3000 3000 3/4 4 5 1110 Location Approved: ��11 t s ' i y.J Concrete Truck Delivery ( cont.) Zalh Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: BRIGG WHITEHALL ESTATES S v"' A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 �~ INSPECTOR: Dan O'Connor EMP.#: REPORT#: DATE: 9/2 5/9 8 CODE: C26 ARR.TIME: 6:00 am JOB HRS.: 8 T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L WIND: h LOW HUMID.: H L X SUNNY The following record is of the trucks that arrived at the project site. Control tests of slump, air conten density and temperature were completed.as often as necessary to insure that the specification limits were not exceeded and to insure uniformity from load. Load Arr. Truck No. Mix Conc. Slump Air Air Concrete Concrete CA Cyl. Set Gallons Ur No. Time No. Yards Duration Temp. (in.) (%) Temp. Strength Strength Size Fabr # added Wei (min.) °F (F°) Deliv. Required (Water) (p( 23 11 :25 51 11 1 175 1 1 1 13000 13000 3/4 Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Approved: N LOCATION PLAN PROPOSED WHITEHALL ESTATE - HYANNIS, MA NOTES LOCATIONS ARE , �� BRIGGS ENGINEERING& TESTING APPROXIMATE. IBRIGGSJ 100 WEYMOUTH STREET, UNIT Bi ROCKLAND, MASSACHUSETTS DR. BY: DWG SCALE: 1"=40' +/- PROD. NO: 82706 K'D BY: PMS DATE: FIGURE NO. 1 Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: �VX/ f`e �4 /( RIGrGS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: PZ 70ZJ Date: <0V Client: / Zr& 5-f66-P Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Location: /oa r Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount ;ement lbs. Ticket No.: l -z Batch Time: D 'fine Aggregate lbs. Strenqth Delivered: .300 C�) :oarse Aggregate lbs. Strencith Required: U 062 Vater Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: Vater Reducing oz. Truck No.: s— 3 Load #.: -2 S kir Entraining oz. Number of l.: y C.A. Size: Aher oz. Slump 7� Air Content ,S ASTM C-143 5' ASTM C-231/C-173 :field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: 7 Air Temp. kSTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 lemarks: Contractor and S /a�tj By whom prepared: )roducer are both responsible Ga .101 Concrete Source: C'4 P eod Pad or added water as per ASTM M of water � General Contractor C'-Okla r 105S vC�io .11 11 - _ s. added ,/P r -94. Discharge time limit eo 35 Storage Location:by /S • ✓�c mina max. 40 40 min. or 300 revolutions. ��d Curing Box: ri)v. Curing Temp. F° S D 06 CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 Day Air Dry Unit Wei ht: Pcf Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture` Number Tested at test in. in. 1(sq.1n.) cf LBS.' Stren h PSI (ASTM C-39) 10, 7 � .5 13 I 3 I I Approved: C r Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 ��e1 6� Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: A)A Y-e. Aal. 2557��*e S RIGGS A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 2 70& Q Date: / -2.s/ i F Client: Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Location: Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount :ement lbs. Ticket No.: / Batch Time: 'ine Aggregate lbs. Strenqth Delivered: U c :oarse Aggregate lbs. Strenqth Reauired: .3 d� Vater Gals. Set No.: 44 Time of Test: /D o 0 Vater Reducing oz. Truck No.: 3 Load #.: If kir Entraining oz. Number of l.: C.A. Size: 31 )ther oz. Slump Air Content 7. Z ASTM C-143 7 Z ASTM C-231/C-173 :field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: kSTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 7 t!o lemarks: Contractor and 906 c�)ed By whom prepared: )roducer are both responsible S Gals 101 Concrete Source: C a P 1 ea� eo d ' 20 or added water as per ASTM M of crater 25 General Contractor Co vt r'P S L'o"5-t-PLX'Yid c-t 5 added 30 -94. Discharge time limit e0 M4 35 Storage Location:by /5t+ra;lev- min. max. 30 min. or 300 revolutions. Curing Box: pJ0 Curing Temp. F° 5-- 20 CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 DaV Air Dry Unit We' ht: pcf I Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test in. in. s .'in, cf LBS. Stren h PSI (ASTM C-39 C 0 I I Approved: Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 000*ZAIR Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: i,,)4 .`!-e yip/l $ iRIGGS p A Division of PK Associates. Inc. PROJECT#-. 9.2706 IDate: Client: Cam, 1`ES C'on S7�!^Ue �� 'E sAn, r 5er✓ic-e5 Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Location: Fioyr Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount ' :ement lbs. Ticket No.: ! 0-7 Batch Time: ine Aggregate lbs. Strength Delivered: 30U0 -parse Aggregate lbs. Strength Required: D OC) Vater Gals. Set No.: Time of Test: 6 ZS Vater Reducing oz. Truck No.: Load #.: 1 2- kir Entraining oz. Number of C I.: C.A. Size: 3/ - Aher oz. Slump „ Air Content G ASTM C-143 ASTM C-231/C-173 Meld Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: Air Temp.: ►STM 0-138 ASTM C-1064 73 y lemarks: Contractor and B whom prepared: �e iroducer are both responsible Uadd:ed 90�10 Concrete Source: Q e C°c ke c d to or added water as per ASTM General Contractor 60A COS �C 01,% -94. Discharge time limit so Storage Location: lo /S'� Tsui e r min. max. 10 min. or 300 revolutions. Curing Box: Curing Temp. F° CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 ?8 Day Air Dry Unit Wei ht: pcf I Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test in. in. .'in. cf LBS. Strength PSI (ASTM C-39) I Approved: Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 Briggs e Testing PROJECT: 'f a �-�-f- �IGGS gg Enain enng & g � � � A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: g_� 6 Date: .Z /fF CLrk !;'Ida Client: eon Cement Brand or Class: Approved Mix Design Location: Op f 1 Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount Cement lbs. Ticket No.: 9 Batch Time: 9S Fine Aqqreqate lbs. Strength Delivered: 000 Coarse Aggregate lbs. Strenqth Required: .3000 Water Gals. Set No.:. Time of Test: �U Water Reducing oz. Truck No.: -7 Load Air Entrai.ning oz. Number of I.: C.A. Size: Other oz. Slump -3 11y ,1 Air Content -2,-Z ASTM C-143 ASTM C-231/C-173 Field Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Tem p.: c�p Air Temp.: ASTM C-138 ASTM C-1064 6 Remarks: Contractor and By whom prepared:905 e producer are both responsible S 101 Concrete Source: de zee �o� RV-4 A-I for added water as per ASTM 70 of water 2 General Contractor 5 added 36 , C-94. Discharge time limit 90 35 Storage Location: J 40 y 10- 1-r6 � 1EIr min.�o max. 90 min. or 300 revolutions. AMA Curing Box: x)d Curing Temp. F° :O0 ��a CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 28 Day Air Dry Unit Weight pcf I Unit Weight As Received: pcf Specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested I at test in. in. (sq..in. cf LBS. Stren h PSI ASTM C-39 I16-2-9V&j 40 'IK--0 a.5-10, 170 0Z q140 D )1 I i . I Approved: Concrete Cylinder Test Result CF-11 �i�e X Briggs Envineerinc, & Testing PROJECT: BRIG GS SS o z d , tom A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: (<< Date: Client: f _ Cement Brand'or Class: Approved Mix Design Location: 0 Mix proportions (by Wt ) 1 cubic yard Amount ement lbs. Ticket No.: 1 �`1'7 Batch Time: ine Aggregate lbs. Strenqth Delivered: 3000 :oarse Aggregate lbs. Strencith Required: 3 O UO later Gals. Set No.: / Time of Test: O Ord Dater Reducing oz. Truck No.: Load #.: Jr Entraining oz. Number of 1.: C.A. Size: -3 - )ther oz. Slump q Air Content ASTM C-143 ASTM C-231/C-173 'ield Unit Weight pcf Target: Concrete Temp.: U Air Temp.: ,STM C-138 I ASTM C-1064 6 s a lemarks: Contractor and B whom prepared: !,7 �• roducer are both responsible Uadd:ed 90 5 Concrete Source: Crock RQc�d f�i 20 30 )r added water as per ASTM General Contractor Co vA r¢S ,94. Discharge time limit 30 Storage Location: dy1�T�'�e( min. max. 0 min. or 300 revolutions. Curing Box:IVp Curing Temp. F° C/ y CONCRETE SAMPLES FABRICATED AND TESTED PER ASTM C-31 and C-39 8 Da Air Dry Unit Wei ht: Pcf Unit Wei ht As Received: pcf specimen Date Age Dia. Height Area Density Max. Load Compressive Type/Fracture Number Tested at test in. in. s .'in, cf LBS. Strength PSI (ASTM C-39) 3 j I Approved: Soils Inspection W`l11` Briggs Engineering & Testi PROJECT: BRIGGS WHITEHALL ESTATES a Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: 82706 INSPECTOR: Chris Hughes EMP.#: REPORT#: DATE: 9/2 3/9 8 CODE: S26 ARR.TIME: JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L WIND: LOW HUMID.: H L X SUNNY Briggs Engineering and Testing field engineers took in place density tests. In place density was determined in accordance with ASTM D-2922 and D-3017 for comparison to the laboratory determined maximum density at optimum moisture in accordance with ASTM D-1557 and/or D698. Location: Please see attached sheet for test locations. Remarks: The area tested was brought to finished grade and compacted with "wacker" . Lift thickness did not exceed 12" . John Feeney was notified of all results. Technician: Chris Hughes Approved ♦♦ Soils Compaction Report BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing PROJECT: �✓ +- A Division of PK Associates, Inc. PROJECT#: WSPECTOR: C EMP.#-. REPORT#: DATE: f- 1 CODE ARR.TIME: JOB HRS.: T.T.: MILEAGE: TEMP.: H L WIND: H L HUMID.: H L SUNNY CLOUDY Maximum Dry Density: Y Optimum Moisture Content: Method of Testing ( Check One) : Sand Cone Nuclear Densometer j i Test Location Estimated Elevation Test Results Req. Min. Moisture Optimum No. Area Tested %Comp. % Comp. Content Moisture % I .s- E sKur 5,00-roo fG. rs s s7s s•r 3 s7•8 ? y' ,Z Tests not meeting requirements: Who noted: Te� Recommendations: ✓►o A%s Remarks: beiIr CV yi id e 6r49ad',04 Technician: Approved i N i l o s,,,o,t►�o-y tsl � L - I .3fvwlXoyddb ���►�� , t�oN 3Q r t• �.a t GRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing A DMsm OF PK Assom FS,INC. September 22, 1998 Parkside Senior Services, L.L.C. FED [E6�,p 5215 Old Orchard Road Suite 700 Skokie, IL 60077-1045 Attn: Ms. Jan Turner EVALUATION OF SOIL Whitehall Estate / Hyannis PROJECT NUMBER 82706 REFERENCE NUMBER M-3561 DATE RECEIVED 1 September 1998 SPECIMEN One sample of Gravelly Sand from Lorusso. METHOD OF ANALYSIS Maximum density tested in accordance with ASTM Standard Test Method D 1557, Method C, four point procedure, and ASTM D 4718. RESULTS PROCTOR Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 132.7 Optimum Moisture (%) 5.8 Oversize Correction (%) 16.0 REMARKS The proctor results are for use in comparing actual in-place density tests. Respectfully submitted, BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING A Division of PK Asoociates, Inc. Mark Liebert Materials Laboratory Supervisor Construction Technology Division 100 Weymouth Street-Unit B-1 100 Pound Road Rockland, MA 02370 Cumberland, RI 02864 Phone(781) 871-6040 9 Fax(781)871-7982 Phone (401)658-2990 9 Fax (401)658-2977 a BRIGGS Briggs Engineering & Testing �.. A Division of PK Associates,Inc. (OProiect: Whitehall Estates Sample no. M-3561 Date: 9/ 1/9 8 Proctor 133 132 Max. Dry. Density -� 132.7 pcf 3 a 131 Optimum a Moisture 130 5.8 % Over Size 129 Correction 16 % 128 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Moisture %