The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0023 LONGWOOD AVENUE cl i OWN OF BARNSTABLE REPORT SUPREMDNTARY/CONTINUATIOAPORT NAME ( FIRST, MIDDLE) Di /DHP7 K— i NOTE DETAILS i OB ERVATIONS—ITEMIZE EVIDENCE, SERIAL /S ETC. e, 4- �Q 10-f— o IC2. ij O /C --ocD J 1 2 +'� 0 1 7- -•rla�S 7115 A7 I SUBMITTED Y PAGE I �/ Town of Barnstable ilding ��. _- PostTh�s�CardSo That it:is V�sible.From tiie•Street A roved;Plans Must be;Retained•son,Job and"this Card Must°be Kept„ BAPIMABLB,: . ° ,.. _,. .�:;..� .,. ". `�.;sl �:.:"` y... PP xW, , a E"`'�,za� a i ,r'�, �^ ';; 5`•` F �; . i63pPost d Until'F�nallnspection Has Been Made . r „ ._ Where a Certificate of Occu anc isRequ�red,such Bu�ld�ng shallNot be Occupied until a"-Finallns.pection'has:beenrnade, Permit Permit No. B-19-409 Applicant Name: kelly keane Approvals Date Issued: 02/11/2019 Current Use: Structure Permit Type: Building-Smoke Detector-Fire Alarm Dection Expiration Date: 08/11/2019 Foundation: System Map/Lot 287-136 Zoning District: RF-1 Sheathing: Location: 23 LONGWOOD AVENUE, HYANNIS Contractor Name�. kelly keane Framing: 1 � . . Owner on Record: FAIR,JAMES THOMAS&ALICE ELIZABETH F Contrac'tor'License 1195 i 2 Address: P O BOX 432 Ah Est Protect Cost: $0.00 Chimney: HYANNISPORT, MA 02647 rmitFee: $35.00 Pe Description:• INSTALLATION OF SECURITY SYSTEM TO INCLUDE PROTECTION FOR Insulation: g .66 Paid: $35.00 FIRE WITH SMOKE DETECTORS&COMBO SMOKE/CRDETECTORS k Final: ,Date 2/11/2019 Project Review Req: 3 Plumbing/Gas = � Rough Plumbing: °Building Official Final Plumbing: This permit shall be deemed abandoned and invalid unless the work authored by.th s permit is commenced within six nmonth�after:issuance. xt�; All work authorized by this permit shall conform to the approved applicaon and theapproved construction documentsfol�which this permit has been granted. Rough Gas: All construction,alterations and changes of use of any building and structures.shall be in compliance with the local zoning by laws and codes. This permit shall be displayed in a location clearly visible from access street or`road a d shall be maintained open for public inspection for the entire duration of the Final Gas: work until the completion of the same. Electrical The Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all applicable signatures by the Building andFire Officials areprovided on thispermit. Minimum of Five Call Inspections Re uired for All Construction Work: Service: 1.Foundation or Footing I Rough: 2.Sheathing Inspection 4, y 3.All Fireplaces must be inspected at the throat level before firest flue lining is installed Final: 4.Wiring&Plumbing Inspections to be completed prior to Frame Inspection 5.Prior to Covering Structural Members(Frame Inspection) Low Voltage Rough: 6.Insulation 7.Final Inspection before Occupancy Low Voltage Final: Where applicable,separate permits are required for Electrical,Plumbing,and Mechanical Installations. Health Work shall not proceed until the Inspector has approved the various stages of construction. Final: "Pe sons contra 'ng with unregistered contractors do not have access to the guaranty fund" (as set forth in MGL c.142A). Fire Department Building plans are to be available on site Final: All Permit Cards are the property of the APPLICANT-ISSUED RECIPIENT IL 13 ADpi atonN=ber... ...... .........1JILDING DEPT. EL BLURFEB 0 7 2olq 11mmft F=.......................................der F= .................... TOMTotalFt-- a P ....................................................................N OF BARNSTABLE TOWN OF BARNSTABLE P=nft ApMv?1 by......I*XA4-e--A-- .......................... BUILDING PE MIM ....................... arca......................................*. APPLICATION Section I—Owner's Information and Project,Location Project Address "XI 1�moq Wfl0d--:ftV-,e— Vffiage Owners Owners Legal Address6 city state zip Owners cell 41 E-mail Section 2—Use of Structure Use Group_ F❑ Commercial Structure over 35,000 cubic feet ❑ Commercial Structure under 35,000 cubic feet Single/Two Family Dwelling Section 3—Type of Permit [] New Construction E] Move/Relocate F1 Accessary Structure El Change of use El Demo/(enfim structure) F] Finish Basement El Family/Amnesty Fireka=IR2ky!� Rebuild El Deck Apartment ❑ SpHrIder System F1 Addition E] Retaining wall ❑ Solar ❑ Renovation El Pool ❑ Insulation Other—Specify Section 4-Work Description Uqwl\a K3e— OA W�6n lc,�ng� RRKArs T a!zt rmdsb!tCL 219M IS f i ApplicationNumber.................................................... Sermon 5—Dew Cost of Proposed Construction Square Footage of Project .Age of Structure Dig Safe Number #Of Bedrooms Existing Total#Of Bedrooms CrToposed) 110 W- H Wmd Zone Compliance Method ❑ MA Cheddist ❑ WFCM Checklist ® Design Section 6—Project Specks ❑ WiHng ❑ Oil Tank Storage ❑ Smoke Detectors O Plun?bing ❑ Gas 0 V� - ❑ Fire Suppression ❑ Heating System. ❑ Masonry C'nlnaney ❑Add./relocate bedroom — -Water Supply Public ❑—l'tivate Sewage Disposal ❑ Municipal ❑ On Site Idistoric District ❑ Hyv:mis FEstoric District ❑ Old iKhup Highway Debris Disposal Facility. I am using a crane ❑ Yes ❑ No Section 7—Flood Zone Flood Zone Designation Within or adjacent to a wetland,coastal bank? Yes ❑ No ❑ Section 8—Zoning Information Zoning District Proposed Use Lot Area Sq.Ft. Total Frontage Percentage of Lot Coverage #of Dwelling Units(on site) Setbacks Front Yard Required Proposed Rear Yard Required Proposed Side Yard Requimd Proposed Has this property had relief from the Zoning Board in the past? ❑ Yes ❑ No Last undmes 219201 S f Application Nunbe,........................................... Section 9—Construction Supemsor NameTelephone Number ! D 9- �4z 1 Address .City v�t c State /0 zip Q License Number License Type Expiration Date Contractors Email � 2 axd�t[ 4�1tc �►� cell# I understand my responsubilifies under the roles and regulations for Licensed Contraction Supervisor in accordance with 780 CMR the Massachusetts State BuRding Code. I tndersmd the construction inspection procedures,spec inspections and docun enttion required by 780 C-N Fi c and the Town of Bamst&ie.Attach a copy of your license. Signature Date Section-l®--Home Improvement Contrador Name Telephone Number Address State zip Registration Number Expiration Date i mcie�d my responsibilifies under the rules and regulations for Home Improvement mars m accordance with 70000 CMR the Massachusetts State Building Code. I understand the construction inspection procedures, c inspections and dommien`-++on required by 780 CMR and the Tovrn of Barnstabl e.Attach a co-py of you-H.LC... Signature Date Section 11—Home Owners License Exemption Home Owners Name: Q2, �Cd Agd Telephone Number Cell or Work Number I understand my responsiblties under the rules and regulations for Licensed Construction S-upm isor in,accordance with 780 CMR the Massachusetts State Building Code. I understand the constriction inspection procedures,specific inspections and documentation required by 780 CMR and the Town of Barnstable. Side Date APPLIC"ANT SIGNATURE Signature Date__2 1 f� Print Name Telephone Number E-nail permit to: 7 a BARNWABLE, MASS. 1639, Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services Thomas F.Geiler,Director Building Division Thomas Perry,CBO Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 Property Owner Must Complete and Sign This Section If Using A Builder as Qv of the subject property hereby authorize (?o to act on my behalf, in all matters relative to work authorized by this building permit application for: ddress; of job) Signature of Gwne- Date Print Name If Property Owner is applying for permit,please complete the Homeowners License Exemption Form on the reyerse side. C:kUsers\decollik\Apl)Da(-,i\Loca]\Mici-osoft\1Vitidows\Toiiip0l',Lly Internet Files\Coiitciit.Oii(look\DDV97AAZ\EXPRESS.doe Revised 072110 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of IndustrialAccidents 1 Congress Street, Suite 100 Boston, MA 02114-2017 SVe�e� www mass.gov/dia Workers' Compensation Insurance Affidavit: General Businesses. TO BE FILED WITH THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY. Applicant Information Please Print Legibly Business/Organization Name: soCl �py � ,�G. Address: - City/State/Zip: h Q Phone #: Are you an employer?Check the appropriate box: Business Type(required): 1. 1 am a employer with employees(full and/ 5. Retail or part-time).* 6. ❑Restaurant/Bar/Eating Establishment 2.❑ I am a sole proprietor or partnership and have no 7. ❑Office and/or Sales(incl.real estate, auto,etc.) employees working for me in any capacity. [No workers' comp.insurance required] 8• Non-profit 3.❑ We are a corporation and its officers have exercised 9. ❑ Entertainment their right of exemption per c. 152, §1(4),and we have 10.❑ Manufacturing no employees. [No workers' comp. insurance required]* 4.❑ We are a non-profit organization,staffed by volunteers, 11.❑ Health Care with no employees. [No workers' comp. insurance req.] 12.❑ Other *Any applicant that checks box#1 must also fill out the section below showing their workers'compensation policy information. **If the corporate officers have exempted themselves,but the corporation has other employees,a workers'compensation policy is required and such an organization should check box#1. I am an employer that is providing `workers'compensation insurance for my employees. Below is the policy information. Insurance Company Name: ll)1Y (1I{ C,I �,il Insurer's Address: —r aV\CT_' City/State/Zip: 4 ,qa 1 S Policy#or Self-ins.Lic.# kiC L6jo-c'Qb ILI'az9 A Expiration Date: 4 I o24 Attach a copy of the workers' compensation policy declaration page(showing the policy number and expiration date). Failure to secure coverage as required under Section 25A of MGL c. 152 can lead to the imposition of criminal penalties of a fine up to$1,500.00 and/or one-year imprisonment,as well as civil penalties in the form of a STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of up to$250.00 a day against the violator. Be advised that a copy of this statement may be forwarded to the Office of Investigations of the DIA for insurance coverage verification. I do hereby cer ify,under the pains and penalties of perjury that the information provided above is true and correct. Signature: Date: 2 ' Phone#: 50'b-77 5' 3L�42- Official use only. Do not write in this area,to be completed by city or town official. City or Town: Permit/License# Issuing Authority(circle one): 1.Board of Health 2. Building Department 3.City/Town Clerk 4.Licensing Board 5.Selectmen's Office 6. Other Contact Person: Phone#: www.mass.gov/dia f �f Commonwealth of Massachusetts t�W!r Department of Public Safety License: SSCO-00 ' i Security Systems -S-License KELLY A KEANE Employer: ASSOCIATED ALARM Commissioner Expiration: ¢ 04/27/2019 _..- ._........ ------- ---— Fold,Then Detach Along All Perforations D ® o 0 0 ELECYRtCIANS::.?:; > >?'`.. ISSUES THFF.OLLOWING LICENSE AS A ;:::'> REGISTERED SYSTEM CONTRACTOR a aCFLLY A KEANE ,. 4SSOCIATEQ ALARM SYSTEMS INC a' % PO BOX.:4.2. ... COTU,IT, MA 02635-0472`:' g:> 1195 C >` 07/31/20 9:.:;:.1 125338 Assessor's office(1st Floor): Assessor's map lot number O / �3�a �� SSSEF iC SYSTEM Q T BESINE Conservation INSTALLEWN COMPLIANCE 1 Board of Health(3rd floor): _ WITH TITLE 5 t DsaasTi►nL Sewage Permit number 2tL 2 66 'y ENVIRONMENTAL CODE AND r639. Engineering Department(3rd floor): 2 TOWN REGULATIONS air House number -) ka �� \ Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board 19 - APPLICATIONS PROCESSED 8:30-9:30 A.M.and 1:00-2:00 P.M.only TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING- DIVISION APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO o► TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 19 TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned hereby applies for a permit according to the following information: Location 2 .3C el �.Gr� Proposed Use /7 Zoning District ] Fire District Name of Owner Address Name of Builder Address Name of Architect Address Number of Rooms Foundation ev Exterior ,cslL,s 11 Roofing %�tez Floors �' ��/Z Y i Interior Heating Plumbing Ya P��i Fireplace lJ��,�t� Approximate Cost /G , a C/0 Area L/O D.d .P Diagram of Lot and Building with Dimen 'ons ee l � rrolvT OCCUPANCY PERMITS REQUIRED FOR NEW DWELLINGS I hereby agree to conform to all the Rules and Regulations of the Town of Barnstable regarding the above construction. Named' . Home Imrpovement Contractor Registration# / 6 �/�/ Construction Supervisor's License# 00 Z/ 7 t� FOWLER, HARRY 23 L'ONG OQD AVENUE, HYANNISPORT-` d No Permit For ADD TO GARAGE Accessory Dwelling Location ` Owner ' Type of Construction Plot Lot Permit Granted[[ Sept. 13,• 19 94 ~ ' Date of Jnspec��ei n •19 ' Date Completed 19 '' y 1 r 'r ,a RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY MAP NO. LOT NO. 23 Longwood Ave. FIRE DISTRICT SUMMARY . . STREET HyannlsDort H7,3 LAND /7 7 BLDGS. OWNER __'!r G�> i TOTAL i RECORD OF TRANSFER DATE BK PG I.R.S. REMARKS: 6 U LAND BLDcs. 77 Uri rn a TOTAL A ' Fowler. Sally W. 1 5 0 738 h6h B.35a LAND y o/OSally F. F '� 1'i� r/, Is 563 16O a3 BLDGS. a. • D 57 rf/q:.. :y c %i i !.: 9 40 4 A c ANT N TOTAL l LAND ( s ff,,T ALSO ,I �s V Q r , BLDGS. TOTAL LAND / yo 01 BLDGS. - I�✓C630N /YIARC(JiONT 1�5/T�/I TOTAL LAND BLDGS. / G 0) -.- �/��Mlf' 20/'7 GA%YI/1 ��I�77 TOTAL I L S 8 LAND BLDGS. O1 _. TOTAL LAND INTERIOR INSPECTED: � , � "' � �`, 0) BLDGS TOTAL DATE: '�, LAND ACREAGE COMPUTATIONS BLDGS. LAND TYPE # OF ACRES PRICE TOTAL DEPR. VALUE TOTAL HOUS 5% 00�0 /77 /77 LAND f CLEAR RONT BLDGS.J TOTAL REAR WOODS&SPROUT FRONT LAND REAR BLDGS. WASTE FRONT TOTAL REAR LAND BLDGS. TOTAL LAND BLDGS. --- LOT COMPUTATIONS LAND FACTORS TOTAL FRONT DEPTH STREET PRICE DEPTH% FRONT FT. PRICE TOTAL DEPR. COR. INF. VALUE HILLY TOWN SEWER KLAND ,,:__ROUGH TOWN WATER OHIGH GRAVEL RD. LOW DIRT RD. LAND SWAMPY RD BLDGS. LAND CUS'f . Cbne.Walla Fin. Bsmt.Area Bath Room ! / Base BLDG. COST Conc.Blk.Walls Bsmt.Rec.Room St. Shower Bath Bsmt. PURCH. DATE Conc. Slab Bsmt.Garage St. Shower Ext. Walls PURCH. PRICE. Brick Walls Attic Fl. &Stairs Toilet Room Roof � RENT Stone Wells Fin.Attic Two Fixt.Bath Piers INTERIOR FINISH Lavatory Extra Floors Bsmt. F 1 2 3 Sink /3 s r r/ Plaster Water Clo.Extra Attic J EXTERIOR WALLS R>fM Pine Water Only �smt.Fin.B�1 Double Siding Plywood No Plumbing Single Siding Plasterboard Int. Fin. Dn Shingles TILING v Conc.Blk. J.GF Bath FI. Heat Face Brk.On Int.LayoutBath Fl.&Wains. Auto Ht.UnitVeneer Int.Cond. Bath Fl.&Walls Fireplace 4— /p Oo Com: Brk.On HEATING Toilet Rm. Fl. Plumbing Solid Com.Brk. Hot Air W Toilet Rm.Fl.&Wains. r� •/YI�> /r Steam Toilet Rm.Fl.&Walls Tiling Blanket Ins. Hot Water St. Shower Roof Ins. V Air Cond. Tub Area Total • .//e Floor Furn. ROOFING COMPUTATIONS Asph.Shingle Pipeless Furn. a C S.F. 9 I a U TTAL,�zz— Wood Shingle No Heat2-L-9 L 2 7 S.F. Asbs.Shingle Oil Burner S. F. Slate Coal Stoker 5/ S S.F. /a_Tile !.°. 1;�/c'C, Gas S. F. O BUILDINGS ROOF TYPE Electric Gable Flat S.F. 1 2 3 4 1516 7 8 9 10 1 21314 516 7 819110 MEASURE[' Hip Mansard FIREPLACES S.F. Pier Found. Floor .� Gambrel Fireplace Stack Wall Found. 0.H.Door LISTED FLO R Fireplace Sgle.Sdg. / Roll Roofing Conc. LIGHTING Dble.Sdg. Shingle Roof Earth No Elect. DATE Pine Shingle Walls Plumbing Hardwood ROOMS Cement Blk. Electric Asph.Tile Bsmt. Ist3�` T TOTAL 3 a Sa S Brick Int.Finish ICED Single 2ndg eZ,;`j 3rd FACTOR /4 ) /� REPLACEMENT �.C% ,/ r'/ i`"' .,:5• >,;;r:1�!''] < <`) tI ' OCCUPANCY �� ONSTRUCTION SIZE AREA CLASS AGE REEMOD. C0146. REPL. VAL. Phy.Dep. PHYS. VALUE Funct.Dep. ACTUAL VAL. t { ,g � Z O / Sr 6 2 (/94D r) 3 4 5- 6 7 B s tO TOTAL iOPERTY ADDRESS I ZONING I DISTRICT CODE SP-DISTS.I DATE PRINTED CSTATE LASS I PCS I NBHD KEY NO. O+J23 LONGWOOD AVENUE 08 RF-1 400 08HY 01/04/96 1091 00 59AA R287 1.36. 190821 LAND/OTHER FEATURES DESCRIPTION r ADJUSTMENT FACTORS TY UNIT ADJ'D.UNIT By/Dale sr:e Dmen.ror, ILOC./YR.SPEC.CLASS ADJ. CON.. PE PRICE PRICE ACRES/UNITS VALUE Da:cription F Of L E R.. HARRY HART T R MAP— L.- CD. FFDe Ih/Acres CARDS IN ACCOUNT — BATHS 0.1 U 1 X C= 100 2500.0c 2500.00 1.00 25OU 3 02 OF 02 NO HEAT S X C= 100 2.35 2.35 380 900—d MARKET 184400 r INCOME A USE D APPRAISED VALUE J ; A 245P600 PARCEL SUMMARY U LAND 1.35800 Tj Si BLDGS 109800 M i O—IMPS TOTAL 245600 E ( I I N CNST N I DEED REFERENCE Type DATE Recorded P R I O R YEAR VALUE T I B—i, Page MD. Y, .D Sees P,Ice LAND 135800 S BLDGS 10980C TOTAL 245600 BUILDING PERMIT Number Date Type Amount LAND LAND—ADJ INC ME USE SP—BLDS FEATURE BLD—ADJSI UNITS 1600 Class Consl. TOtal Veat Built Norm. Obsv. U nrls Unrls Base Rale Atlj.Rate Ac119 91g Age No Contl. CND. Lac. °:o R.G. Repl.Cost New Adj.Repl.Value Stories Height Rooms ed Rms Baths •Fire. Perlywell Fac. 0 000 100 100 67.90 67.90 94 94 100 60 100 60 35634 21400 1 .0 2 1 .1 2.0 Uescriplion Rate So.—Feel Repl.Cost MKT.INDEX: 1♦00 IMP.BY/DATE: ML 8/95 SCALE: 1/00.90 ELEMENTS CODE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL BAS 100 67.90 380 25802 GROSS AREA 380 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CNST GP: 0 FFG 30 20.37 304 6192 FWD 85 8.50 240 2040 20 STYLE 09COTTAGE D.* FWD ! DES CGN ADJ`1T 00 0: ! ! .XTER.uALLS T1W-10D $HINI;IEs 0. 12 12 HEAT/AC TYPE 01N64E 0. INTER.FINISH 05PLASTER -----------0. ! ! INTE9 L-0-0UT f38cLOW AVERAGE (T *------16-----*--------20-------* INTER.3UALTY 02SAME AS EXTER. 0. ! FFG ! ! FLJDR STRUC 02TA JOIST79EAM 0. p W ! ! ! EFLOOR COVER 04 CAW 0ET 6. E Tor al Areas A. = 544 Base= 380 ! ! ! R50- TYPE 01 GAB LE—A§PH SH 0. LcIGE --�1- BUILDING DIMENSIONS ! 1 C TRCAL 01AVE RA U. A BAS W20 N19 FFG W16 S19 E16 N19 19 19 BASE 19 FOU.YDATION 01POURED CONC 9(7 FWD N12 E20 S12 W20 .. BAS ! -------------- --- ------------------- L ! ! ! LAND TOTAL MARKET ! ! PARCEL *------16-----*--------20-------X AREA VARIANCE +0 +0 STANDARD Bk 30203 Ps 1 16 63627 12-30-2016 a 11211a MASSACHUSETTS STATE EXCISE TAX BARNSTABLE COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS Date: 12-30-2016 a 11:11ara Ctla: 385 Doc:: 68627 Fee: $21992.50 Cons: $875000.00 BARNSTABLE COUNTY EXCISE TAX BARNSTABLE COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS Date: 12-30-2016 a 11:11am Ctl'"- 385 Dory: 68627 Fee: $29677.50 Cons: $8751000.00 tiL QUITCLAIM DEED S7 , L John Eliot Fowler U,as Trustee of the 23 Longwood 1991 Realty Trust u/d/t dated April 29, 1991 -- and recorded with the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds in Book 7517,Page 57,with a mailing o� address of c/o Choate Hall&Stewart LLP,2 International Place,Boston,MA 02110, for consideration paid of Eight Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand ($875,000.00)Dollars, grant to James Michael Fair and Alice Elizabeth Fair,husband and wife,as tenants by the entirety, 0 of 8 Spruce Street,#60M,New York,NY 10038, 3 with quitclaim covenants 0 - The land together with the buildings thereon,located in Barnstable(Hyannis Port),Barnstable 1`n County,Massachusetts,described as follows: N Said land being shown as Lot 4 on a plan entitled:"Property of Sally F.Reybum,Hyannisport, Mass"dated November 4, 1954,drawn by Bearse&Kellogg,Civil Engineers,which is recorded with the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds in Plan Book 119,Page 65. Containing 15,400 square feet of land,more or less. For my title,see deed recorded with the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds in Book 7517, Page 63. --. bll...- _..._.. . - 6,nei5POW 4�a9e4ij3 P 0559 H Z � 4a w C • z N- i OWN e N M w 69g1 OI N N ,. a all N i j " .- •. A � C1 IN Z 0 M9No1 i A SB Qp0 ggzito ¢g6 I Executsd as a sealed-insta went thi;i a i ay o December,2016 ; C✓`�0.Vij-2.+r.:yv..., of SR4 A+ a {; John Eliot Fowler T,b r,jtpe�y ti:. • l BP W9889-0317 95-10-18 2120 Ii052716 FORM M-792 THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASS�ACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE }} ESTATE TAX BUREAU,P.O.BOX 7023,BOSTON,MA 02204 CERTIFICATE RELEASIN3 MASSACHUSETTS ESTATE TAX LIEN (FILE IN TRIPLICATE WITH COPY OF RECORDED DEED.) DEOE NTI "ODLE LAS NAME MAIL TO: FIRST 006M ONTML NAME Jonathan Uavis, Esq. Sally N. Fowler Reyburn' ► Robinson, Karp & Davis, P.C. ADM" 2 Newton EXecutive Park Suite 104 �Ro6ATEe0tNtT ' stable A oFDEATH pq.6TREE[) e nr oR TowN, Newton, MA 02162 OOCkEvon- Case #:94PO381WF November 15, 1993 &1A A►E/O R SiQE (DQAIICILE)A[104& ATII '23 Longwood Avenue Hyannis Port, MA. L This Certi icate releases the lien of the Commonwea t o Massachusetts imposed by Chapter. 65C of the General Laws, on any and all interests which the Decedent may have had in the property described below: Land of approximately 15,400 square -feet: with a single family house and garage located at 23 Louxgwood Avenue, Hyannis Port, Barnstable.County, Massachusetts. REAL ESTATE (full legal description not necessary) 23 Longwood Avenue Hyannis Poet, MA. . 02647 ._ _Location of property NUMOER >:TRRGT (IT YURTOWw Q As described by Deed dated Apri1_314_1"l_____ _ and recorded in Barnstable County Registry of Dees 7517 063 aEotsTRY of PkEns ook No. ._ .—------ Page No. ,or ❑ As described by certificate of Tide No. _—___ recorded in Registered Land Section for County -`�`COMI+�IQNER-OF , BARNSTABLE REQISTRWOF DEEDS p R0 q •�- M8? AGRIBALANCE010. Company Name CAPE COD INSULATION Phone Number 1-800-696-6611 Kyle Pratt Installation Date 03/08/2019 Jobsite Address 23 Longwood Avenue, Hyannis Port A-Side Lot#'s GE018379 Permit Number B-Side Lot#'s P12455502919 Roof Line 9" R-40 1,300 square feet Outside Walls 5.5 R-24 350 square feet Outside Walls 4`' 3.5 R-16 300 square feet Overhang/ Floor 6.7 R-30 370 square feet t :J 1:.CJ�r1 • • V W1►7�3RI�CJ�wvw`.C,7•r Sherwin Williams Vapor Barrier Paint Roof Line Ceiling&Walls Blazelok TB Attic Ceiling 17 mils wet/23 mils dry www.Demilec.com o� c8DEMILEC . "e Town of Barnstable Building .� '��':;,�..: s'$ ..'`�`;•�St`` ,. �'S> s�'�. �",.: �"'''� '�'�a�� E�a ,:w,�e. � ;:ws -.�� _;s�`�s`"�t-:.. .`.sr^ � `a`..;a'�'�` r��..`'��. »� ,V � PostThis Card SogThatit is Visible;FromStreet Approved Plans Must beRetamed on;Job and;ahis Card Must beKept r , * WMNSCAHLE. •' �. „gtee '•➢. a &� .' ".:;.1oWe Permit a Cert�ficatew fOcc pancy is Requiredh BuildmgshalINot,be Occupied until a Finallnspecton hasbeen�ma�„de Pk Permit No. B-18-3179 Applicant Name: E J JAXTIMER BUILDER INC. Approvals Date Issued: 10/09/2018 Current Use: Structure Permit Type: Building-Addition/Alteration-Residential Expiration Date: 04/09/2019 Foundation: Location: 23 LONGWOOD AVENUE, HYANNIS Map/Lot 287-136 Zoning District: RF-1 Sheathing: Owner on Record: FAIR,JAMES THOMAS&ALICE ELIZABETH Contractor Name:: .E J JAXTIMER BUILDER INC. Framing: Address: P O BOX 432 s, Contractor License 110609 2 HYANNISPORT, MA 02647 Est Project Cost: $ 150,000.00 Chimney: Description: dormer additions within existing footprint. renovate,existing Permlt,Fee: $815.00 Je ' bathroom,add 1 new bathroom,interior partition changes Insulatio Fee Paid;; $815.00 Project Review Req: Main House only Date 10/9/2018 Final Plumbing/Gas 14 � Rough Plumbing: � < Building Official Final Plumbing: Rough Gas: This permit shall be deemed abandoned and invalid unless the work authorized by this permit is commenced within six rrjonthsfaafter i"ssuance. All work authorized by this permit shall conform to the approved application and thejapproved construction documents for which this permit has been granted. Final Gas: All construction,alterations and changes of use of any building and structuresshall be in compliance with the local zoning by laws and codes. This permit shall be displayed in a location clearly visible from access street or;road and shall be maintained open for public inspection for the entire duration of the Electrical work until the completion of the same. .> Service: :• , •fir . r . -s z:i. The Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all applicable signatures by the Building an¢Fire Officials are provided on,,, permit. Minimum of Five Call Inspections Required for All Construction Work: Rough: 1.Foundation or Footing 2.Sheathing Inspection Final: 3.All Fireplaces must be inspected at the throat level before firest flue lining is installed 4.Wiring&Plumbing Inspections to be completed prior to Frame Inspection Low Voltage Rough: 5.Prior to Covering Structural Members(Frame Inspection) 6.Insulation Low Voltage Final: 7.Final Inspection before Occupancy Health t: Where applicable,separate permits are required for Electrical,Plumbing,and Mechanical Installations. Final: Work shall not proceed until the Inspector has approved the various stages of construction. "Perso contra t'ng with unregistered contractors do not have access to the guaranty fund" (as set forth in MGL c.142A). Fire Department sue` Final: Building plans are to be available on site mac` All Permit Cards are the property of the APPLICANT-ISSUED RECIPIENT SHE Application Number... ............... BUILDING DE ...... ..........:...... .......................Permit Fee. r PUS& 1659. SEP 2 7 21118 TotalFee Paid................................................... TOWN OF BARh KAB-L'r- 0 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Permit Approval by............. .. ..........!.......OIL.../...091 -- BUILDING PERMIT O-z-1-15-1 ...........Parc&.......1.36.............................. MT............................. ....... APPLICATION Section 1 Owner's information and Project Location Village Project Address 6 Owners Name---J"V—C Owners Legal Address State zip City 0 Owners Cell# E-mail LSection 2—Use of Structure Use&OUP—E R Commercial Structure over 35,000 cubic feet ❑ Commercial Structure under 35,000 cubir,feet JSingle/Two Family Dwelling Section 3—Type of Permit E] New Construction ❑ Move/Relocate E] Accessory Structure El Change Of use ❑ Demo/(entire structure) F1 Finish Basement El Family/Amnesty El Fire Alarm Rebuild El Deck Apartment El Sprinkler system F] Addition Retaining wall F] Solar VkRenovation ❑ Pool ❑ Insulation Other—Specify, Section 4 - Work Description ocrocr . 00;4:1t,C11 61c"(-s cl— 11 E: Section 4�- W, T Aszt Tmd.-Aed--2/9/2018 Application Number..................................................... Section 5-Detail Cost of Proposed Construction b, D 00 Square Footage of Project `Z`3 5-: . Age of Structure `'r 3 y c 5 Dig Safe Number #Of Bedrooms Existing Total# Of Bedrooms (proposed) 110 MPH Wind Zone Compliance Method ❑ MA Checklist ❑ WFCM Checklist,& Design Section 6—Project Specifics -g Wiring [] Oil Tank Storage Smoke Detectors Plumbing Gas ❑ Fire Suppression Heating System ❑ Masonry Chimney ❑Add/relocate bedroom Water Supply Public ❑ Private Sewage Disposal ❑ Municipal On Site Historic District ❑ Hyannis Historic District ❑ Old Kings Highway Debris Disposal Facility: Aoc I am using a crane ❑ Yes 0 No Section 7—Flood Zone Flood Zone Designation Within or adjacent to a wetland, coastal bank? Yes ❑ No ❑ Section 8—Zoning Information Zoning District ��` Proposed Use 1y Lot Area Sq.Ft. Total Frontage Percentage of Lot Coverage #of Dwelling Units (on site) Setbacks Front Yard Required Proposed Rear Yard Required Proposed Side Yard Required Proposed Has this property had relief from the Zoning Board in the past? © Yes 0 No Last undated:2/9/201 S r The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents Office of Investigations -' 600 Washington Street Boston, MA 02111 www.mass.gov/dia Workers' Compensation Insurance Affidavit: Builders/Contractors/Electricians/Plumbers Applicant Information Please Print Legibly Name (Business/Organization/Individual): pf y I r/ d e r: Inc, Address: fidser City/State/Zip: 2./V_S m Phone #: Cboy 77� Are you an employer?Che k the appropri to box: . I am a general contractor and I Type of project(required): Yam 4 1.[ a employer with_ ❑ g employees(full and/or part-time).* have hired the sub-contractors 6: ❑New construction 2.❑ I am a sole proprietor or partner- listed on the attached sheet. 7. Remodeling ship and have no employees These sub-contractors have g, ❑ Demolition working for me in any capacity. employees and have workers' 9. ❑ Building addition [No workers' comp. insurance comp. insurance.1 required.] 5. ❑ We are a corporation and its 10.❑ Electrical repairs or additions 3.❑ I am a homeowner doing all work officers have exercised their 11.❑ Plumbing repairs or additions myself. [No workers' comp. right of exemption per MGL 12.❑ Roof repairs insurance required.] t c. 152, §1(4), and we have no employees. [No workers' 11❑ Other comp. insurance required.] *Any applicant that checks box#1 must also fill out the section below showing their workers'compensation policy information. t Homeowners who submit this affidavit indicating they are doing all work and then hire outside contractors must submit a new affidavit indicating such. lContractors that check this box must attached an additional sheet showing the name of the sub-contractors and state whether or not those entities have employees. If the sub-contractors have employees,they must provide their workers'comp.policy number. I am an employer that is providing workers'compensation insurance for my employees. Below is the policy and job site information. (' Insurance Company Name: Policy#or Self-ins. Lic. #: �� Expiration Date: 0l b 0 Job Site Address: City/State/Zip: XA � - Attach a copy of the workers' c mpensation policy declaration page(showing the policy number and expiration date). Failure to secure coverage as required under Section 25A of MGL c. 152 can lead to the imposition of criminal penalties of a fine up to $1,500.00 and/or one-year imprisonment, as well as civil penalties in the form of a STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of up to$250.00 a day against the violator. Be advised that a copy of this statement may be forwarded to the Office of Investigations of the DIA for insurance coverage verification. I do hereby certif er the pains and penalties of perjury that the information provided abov is true' nd correct. Signature: Date: Phone#: Official use only. Do not write in this area,to be completed by city or town official. City or Town: Permit/License# Issuing Authority(circle one): 1.Board of Health 2.Building Department 3. City/Town Clerk 4. Electrical Inspector 5. Plumbing Inspector 6. Other Contact Person: Phone#: Commonwealth of Massachusetts i®: Division of Professional Licensure ! Board of Building Regulations and Standards Constrpct oniSdpervisor CS-003251 E.-x* es:01/14/2020 ERNEST J JAXTIMER i 48 ROSARY LANE `r HYANNIS MA 02601 ^t �S'•i:1h��. ,l Commissioner ��---///��-��---_ I AILI �. li�2u1P�.(��fFi �' ��L�I�cri�'1"t.',te-11S Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation 10 Park Plaza- Suite 5170 Boston, Massachusetts 02116 Home Improvement.Contractor Registration Type: Corporation E J Jaxtimer, Builder, Inc. - Registration: iration: 11/02/2018 48 Rosary Ln Hyannis, MA 02M Update Address and return card. Mark reason for change. SCA1 Co 207J'-05111 0 Addracc rl Rpnewal ❑Empfoymertt ❑Lost Card — Office of Consumer Affairs&Business Regulation HOME IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTOR Registration valid for individual use only Type: Corporation before the expiration date. if found return to: ' Re4igtr2Uon Exoiration Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation 110609 11=2018 10 Park Ptaza-Snite SIT0 Boston,MA 0 16 E J Jaxtimer,Builder,Inc. Ernest JaMimer 48 Rosary Ln Hyannis,MA 02601 Undersecretary Not valid without signature i ,a►`�o�® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE 01/03/2018 Y) THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CNTANAME:C Erica H.O'Connor HART INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. 243 MAIN STREET PHONE No,E t 508-759-7326 x205 FAX Ne:508-759-7366 PO BOX 700 - E-MAIL eoconnor@hartinsurancea enc .com BUZZARDS BAY,MA 025320700 ADDRESS: 9 Y INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A: ARBELLA PROTECTION INS CO 41360 INSURED EJ Jaxtimer Builder, Inc INSURER B: ARBELLA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY 10017 48 Rosary Lane Hyannis,MA 02601 INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E: - INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR Y EXP LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVD SUBR POLICY NUMBER MM/DD/YYYY MM/DPOLICY EFF D/YYYY LIMITS A COMMERCIALGENERALLIABILITY 8500042039 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS-MADE V OCCUR DAMAGE TO300,000 PREMISES Ea occurrence) $ MED EXP(Any one person) $ 5,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 POLICY 0 PRO- JECT LOG PRODUCTS-COMP/OPAGG $ 2,000,000 OTHER: $ A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 1020011547 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 Ea accident ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ OWNED SCHEDULED _ BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY Per accident $ A UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR 4600042040 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5,000,000 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ 5,000,000 DED RETENTION$ 10,000 $ B WORKERS COMPENSATION 4220048905 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 V1 PER OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N STATUTE ER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 500,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED' F`N] N/A (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached if more space is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION Fax#:(508)775-3344 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN Town of Barnstable ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 200 Main Street Hyannis,MA 02601 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD L Town of Barnstable Regulatory Services Vereets. Richard V.Scali,Director 6 Building Division Tom Perry,Building Commissioner 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 www.town.barnstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 Property Owner Must Complete and Sign This Section If Using A Builder I, dames Falr ,as Owner of the subject property hereby authorize Jeffrey Garran Q' Zvi to act on my behalf, in all matters relative to work authorized by this building permit application for: 23 Longwood Avenue,Hyannis Part (Address of Job) **Pool fences and alarms are the responsibility of the applicant. Pools are not to be filled or utilized before fence is installed and all final ins ection e performed and accepted. 0''~1 Signature of Owner Signature of Applicant V ayriQf Ga(- Print Name Print Name 7/ J 8 N, Date REScheck Software Version 4.6.4 Compliance Certificate Project Fair Residence Energy Code: 2015 IECC Location: Hyannis, Massachusetts Construction Type: Single-family Project Type: Alteration Climate Zone: 5 (6137 HDD) Permit Date: Permit Number: Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 23 Longwood Ave E.J.Jaxtimer Builder, inc E.J.Jaxtimer Builder, Inc Hyannis Port, MA 48 Rosary Lane 48 Rosary Lane Hyannis, MA Hyannis, MA (508) 771-4498 (508) 771-4498 . . Envelope Assemblies Gross Area Cavity Cont. Perimeter New dormer roof: Cathedral Ceiling 290 40.0 0.0 0.026 8 New dormer walls: Wood Frame, 16"o.c. . 384 21.0 0.0 0.057 21 Window 1: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 18 0.300 5 Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application.The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2015 IECC requirements in REScheck Version 44.6.4 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. Name-Title Signature Date Project Title: Fair Residence Report date: 09/27/18 Data filename: Untitled.rck Page 1 of 9 REScheck Software Version 4.6.4 Inspection checklist Energy Code: 2015 IECC Requirements: 0.0% were addressed directly in the REScheck software Text in the "Comments/Assumptions" column is provided by the user in the REScheck Requirements screen. For each requirement, the user certifies that a code requirement will be met and how that is documented, or that an exception is being claimed. Where compliance is itemized in a separate table, a reference to that table is provided. Section Plans Verified Field Verified # Pre-Inspection/Plan Review Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 103.1, iConstruction drawings and ❑Complies i 103.2 ,documentation demonstrate ❑Does Not [PR1]1 ;energy code compliance for the ( :building envelope.Thermal ❑Not Observable envelope represented on ❑Not Applicable ;construction documents. 103.1, iConstruction drawings and ❑Complies 103.2, :documentation demonstrate ❑Does Not 403.7 :energy code compliance for [PR3]1 ;lighting and mechanical systems. a ❑Not Observable (� iSystems serving multiple ❑Not Applicable i ;dwelling units must demonstrate :compliance with the IECC s ;Commercial Provisions. 302.1, Heating and cooling equipment is i Heating: i Heating: i❑Complies 403.7 sized per ACCA Manual S based i Btu/hr i Btu/hr i❑Does Not [PR2]2 on loads calculated per ACCA Cooling: i Cooling: �gJ Manual J or other methods Btu/hr i Btu/hr ❑Not Observable approved by the code official. ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Fair Residence Report date: 09/27/18 Data filename: Untitled.rck Page 2 of 9 Section # Foundation Inspection Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 303.2.1 A protective covering is installed to ;❑Complies [FO11]2 protect exposed exterior insulation I❑Does Not i and extends a minimum of 6 in. below ❑Not Observable' grade. ❑Not Applicable 403.9 Snow-and ice-melting system controls!❑Complies [FO12]2 installed. ?❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Fair Residence Report date: 09/27/18 Data filename: Untitled.rck Page 3 of 9 Section Plans Verified Field Verified' # Framing /Rough-In Inspection Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 402.1.1, !Glazing U-factor(area-weighted U- U- ❑Complies ;see the Envelope Assemblies 402.3.1, average). �❑Does Not ;table for values. 402.3.3, 402.3.6, ❑Not Observable 402.5 :❑Not Applicable [FR2]1 303.1.3 I U-factors of fenestration products ❑Complies [FR4]1 :are determined in accordance ❑Does Not t ;with the NFRC test procedure or Itaken from the default table. ` ❑Not Observable []Not Applicable 402.4.1.1 ;Air barrier and thermal barrier ❑Complies [FR23]1 installed per manufacturer's ( ❑Does Not instructions. i ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.4.3 :Fenestration that is not site built ❑Complies [FR20]1 :is listed and labeled as meeting ❑Does Not AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440 or has infiltration rates per NFRC ❑Not Observable 400 that do not exceed code ❑Not Applicable i limits. 402.4.5 IC-rated recessed lighting fixtures ❑Complies [FR16]2 sealed at housing/interior finish ❑Does Not and labeled to indicate <_2.0 cfm leakage at 75 Pa. ❑Not Observable _ ❑Not Applicable 403.2.1 !Supply and return ducts in attics ❑Complies i [FR12]1 ;insulated >= R-8 where duct is F ❑Does Not >= 3 inches in diameter and >= .R-6 where < 3 inches. Supply and ❑Not Observable i return ducts in other portions of ❑Not Applicable ;the building insulated >= R-6 for ;diameter>= 3 inches and R-4.2 :for< 3 inches in diameter. 403.3.3.5 Building cavities are not used as ❑Complies [FR15]3 Iducts or plenums. r ❑Does Not t ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.4 HVAC piping conveying fluids R- R- []Complies [FR17]z above 105 °F or chilled fluids ❑Does Not below 55 °F are insulated to >_R- l� 3 ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.4.1 :Protection of insulation on HVAC [ ❑Complies [FR24]1 piping. ❑Does Not l ) ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.5.3 Hot water pipes are insulated to R- R- ElComplies [FR18]2 >R-3. ❑Does Not l�) '❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.6 Automatic or gravity dampers are ❑Complies I [FR19]2 installed on all outdoor air ❑Does Not intakes and exhausts. i ❑Not Observable ], ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Fair Residence Report date: 09/27/18 Data filename: Untitled.rck Page 4 of 9 I High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Fair Residence Report date: 09/27/18 Data filename: Untitled.rck Page 5 of 9 Section Plans Verified Field Verified # Insulation Inspection Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 303.1 All installed insulation is labeled ❑Complies [IN13]2 or the installed R-values ❑Does Not provided. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.1.1, I Wall insulation R-value. If this is a; R- R- !❑Complies ;See the Envelope Assemblies 402.2.5, mass wall with at least 1/2 of the ❑ Wood ❑ Wood i❑Does Not :table for values. 402.2.6 ;wall insulation on the wall ❑ Mass ;❑ Mass [IN3]1 :exterior,the exterior insulation ;[]Not Observable i requirement applies (FR10). ❑ Steel ❑ Steel j❑Not Applicable 303.2 ;Wall insulation is installed per ❑Complies [IN4]1 !manufacturer's instructions. []Does Not ❑Not Observable I ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: t 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 ]Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Fair Residence Report date: 09/27/18 Data filename: Untitled.rck Page 6 of g 9 Section Plans Verified Field Verified # Final Inspection Provisions Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions &Req.ID 402.1.1, iCeiling insulation R-value. i R- i R- :❑Complies ;See the Envelope Assemblies 402.2.1, ❑ Wood !❑ Wood :❑Does Not :table for values. 402.2.2, ! Steel ❑ Steel 402.2.E ❑Not Observable [FI1]1 ;❑Not Applicable 303.1.1.1, iCeiling insulation installed per ❑Complies 303.2 imanufacturer's instructions. ❑Does Not [FI2]1 ;Blown insulation marked every i300 ft2. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.2.3 Vented attics with air permeable ❑Complies [F122]2 insulation include baffle adjacent ❑Does Not to soffit and eave vents that extends over insulation. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.2.4 :Attic access hatch and door i R- : R- i❑Complies [F13]1 :insulation >_R-value of the ;❑Does Not ;adjacent assembly. ❑Not Observable :❑Not Applicable 402.4.1.2 Blower door test @ 50 Pa. <=5 ? ACH 50 = ACH 50 = i❑Complies [F117]1 ach in Climate Zones 1-2, and ;❑Does Not <=3 ach in Climate Zones 3-8. ❑Not Observable tlNot Applicable 403.2.3 ;Duct tightness test result of<=4 : cfm/100 cfm/100 !❑Complies [FI4]1 :cfm/100 ft2 across the system or i ft2 ft2 j❑Does Not <=3 cfm/100 ft2 without air ❑Not Observable ;handler @ 25 Pa. For rough-in tests, verification may need to ❑Not Applicable :occur during Framing Inspection. 403.3.2 Ducts are pressure tested to cfm/100 cfm/100 :❑Complies [FI27]1 ;determine air leakage with ft2 ft2 ;❑Does Not ;either:Rough-in test:Total :leakage measured with a ;[]Not Observable pressure differential of 0.1 inch ❑Not Applicable 1w.g, across the system including :the manufacturer's air handler enclosure if installed at time of test. Postconstruction test:Total :leakage measured with a pressure differential of 0.1 inch 4.g. across the entire system :including the manufacturer's air i handler enclosure. 403.3.2.1 ;Air handler leakage designated # ❑Complies [F124]1 by manufacturer at<=2%of ? ❑Does Not ;design air flow. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.1.1 Programmable thermostats ❑Complies [F19]2 installed for control of primary j ❑Does Not heating and cooling systems and j initially set by manufacturer to ❑Not Observable code specifications. ( ❑Not Applicable 403.1.2 Heat pump thermostat installed _ ❑Complies [FI10]2 on heat pumps. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.5.1 Circulating service hot water ❑Complies [FI11]2 systems have automatic or ❑Does Not accessible manual controls. IE]Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 11 High Impact(Tier 1) 2 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Fair Residence Report date: 09/27/18 Data filename: Untitled.rck Page 7 of 9 Section Plans Verified Field Verified # Final Inspection Provisions Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID Value Value 403.6.1 All mechanical ventilation system ❑Complies [F125]2 fans not part of tested and listed ❑Does Not HVAC equipment meet efficacy and air flow limits. ❑Not Observable s` ❑Not Applicable 403.2 Hot water boilers supplying heat ❑Complies [FI26]2 through one-or two-pipe heating ❑Does Not systems have outdoor setback control to lower boiler water ❑Not Observable temperature based on outdoor ❑Not Applicable temperature. 403.5.1.1 Heated water circulation systems ❑Complies (F128]2 have a circulation pump.The ❑Does Not system return pipe is a dedicated s return pipe or a cold water supply ❑Not Observable pipe. Gravity and thermos- ❑Not Applicable syphon circulation systems are not present. Controls for circulating hot water system pumps start the pump with signal for hot water demand within the ? occupancy. Controls automatically turn off the pump when water is in circulation loop i is at set-point temperature and no demand for hot water exists. 403.5.1.2 Electric heat trace systems ) ❑Complies (F129]2 comply with IEEE 515.1 or UL ❑Does Not 515. Controls automatically adjust the energy input to the ❑Not Observable heat tracing to maintain the ❑Not Applicable desired water temperature in the piping. 403.5.2 Water distribution systems that ❑Complies [F130]2 have recirculation pumps that ❑Does Not pump water from a heated water supply pipe back to the heated t ❑Not Observable water source through a cold ❑Not Applicable i water supply pipe have a demand recirculation water system. Pumps have controls ' that manage operation of the pump and limit the temperature of the water entering the cold water piping to 1049F. 403.5.4 Drain water heat recovery units ❑Complies [F]31]2 tested in accordance with CSA ❑Does Not s B55.1. Potable water-side pressure loss of drain water heat ❑Not Observable recovery units < 3 psi for ❑Not Applicable individual units connected to one or two showers. Potable water- side pressure loss of drain water heat recovery units < 2 psi for individual units connected to three or more showers. 404.1 :75%of lamps in permanent ( ❑Complies [FI6]1 ;fixtures or 75%of permanent ❑Does Not ;fixtures have high efficacy lamps. ' Does not apply to low-voltage ❑Not Observable lighting. ❑Not Applicable 404.1.1 Fuel gas lighting systems have ❑Complies [FI23]3 no continuous pilot light. - ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 11 High Impact(Tier 1) 12 J Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Fair Residence Report date: 09/27/18 Data filename: Untitled.rck Page 8 of 9 i Section Plans Verified Field Verified # Final Inspection Provisions Value Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Req.ID 401.3 Compliance certificate posted. ❑Complies [F]7]2 ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 303.3 Manufacturer manuals for ❑Complies [F118]3 mechanical and water heating ❑Does Not systems have been provided. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 1 High Impact(Tier 1) 12 1 Medium Impact(Tier 2) 3 Low Impact(Tier 3) Project Title: Fair Residence Report date: 09/27/18 Data filename: Untitled.rck Page 9 of 9 Application Number.............................................. Section 9—.Construction Supervisor Name �f --J4--Y_77Mj2 . ga//&Z TTelephone Number� )7'7,V :�,/q 4/ Address 4d_AW k(�City State %1'I/-14- Zip o2zi License Number �(�aja-s License Type CS t- Expiration Date Contractors Email i 7 Cell I understand my responsibilities under the rules and regulations for Licensed Construction Supervisor in accordance with 780 CMR the Massachusetts St9ABuilding Code. I understand the construction inspection procedures,specific inspections and documentation re ' e 0 CMR and the TovmQf Barnstable.Attach a copy of your license. Signature Date Section.10 —Home Improvement Contractor Name E-J -J4-X Telephone Number Address LW City ) ' State zip Registration Number Expiration Date I understand my responsibilities under the rules and regulations for Home Improvement Contractors in accordance with 780 CMR the Massachusetts S Building Code. I understand the construction inspection procedures,specific inspections and documentation requir 80 CMR and the Town of Barnstable.Attach a copy of your H.LC... Signature Date Section 11 —Home Owners License Exemption Home Owners Name: Telephone Number Cell or Work Number I understand my responsibilities under the rules and regulations for Licensed Construction Supervisor in accordance with 780 CMR the Massachusetts State Building Code. I unders d the construction inspection procedures,specific inspections and documentation required by 780 CMR and the Town of Barnstable. Signature Date r/jkPPLICANT SIGNATURE V Signature Date Print Name Telephone Number E-mail permit to: ::�A yr C.. Y"`e,r- GO y%-\ T nIn Mill 0 Section 12 —Department Sign-Offs Health Department F Zoning Board(if required) . Historic District ❑ Site Plan Review(if required) ❑ Fire Department ❑ Conservation I For commercial work,please take your plans directly to the fire department for approval. Section 13—Owner's Authorization as Owner of the-subject property hereby authorize to act on my behalf, in all matters relative to work authorized by this building permit application for: (Address of job) Signature of Owner date Print Name Last undated:2/9/2018 'Building'' Town of Barnstable e . ( i ! Post This Card So That it is Visible From the Street-Approved Plans Must be Retained on Job and this Card Must be Kept �HAHT`3i'AUaL6.. 'k MACS- �$� Posted Until Final Inspection Has Been Made, �639 Permit Where a Certificate of Occupancy is Required;such Building shall Not be.Occupied until a Final Inspection has been made. Permit No. B-17-965 Applicant Name: MICHAEL MCCARTHY Approvals Date Issued: 11/21/2017 Current Use: Structure Permit Type: Building-Insulation- Residential Expiration Date: 05/21/2018 Foundation: Location: 23 LONGWOOD AVENUE, HYANNIS Map/Lot: 287-136 Zoning District: RF-1 Sheathing: Owner on Record: FAIR,JAMES THOMAS&ALICE ELIZABETH Contractor Name: MICHAEL MCCARTHY Framing: 1 Address: 8 SPRUCE ST#60M Contractor License: 169393 2 NEW YORK, NY 10038 Est. Project Cost: $ 1,600.00 Chimney: Description: Weatherization Permit Fee: $85.00 Insulation: Project Review Req: Fee Paid: $85.00 Date: 11/21/2017 Final: r.;v_...._ Plumbing/Gas Rough Plumbing: Building Official Final Plumbing: This permit shall be deemed abandoned and invalid unless the work authorized by this permit is commenced within six months after issuance. Rough Gas: All work authorized by this permit shall conform to the approved application and the approved construction documents for which this permit has been granted. All construction,alterations and changes of use of any building and structures shall be in compliance with the local zoning by-laws and codes. Final Gas: This permit shall be displayed in a location clearly visible from access street or road and shall be maintained open for public inspection for the entire duration of the work until the completion of the same. Electrical The Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all applicable signatures by the Building and Fire Officials are provided on this permit. Service: Minimum of Five Call Inspections Required for All Construction Work: Rough: 1.Foundation or Footing 2.Sheathing Inspection Final: 3.All Fireplaces must be inspected at the throat level before firest flue lining is installed 4.Wiring&Plumbing Inspections to be completed prior to Frame Inspection Low Voltage Rough: S.Prior to Covering Structural Members(Frame Inspection) 6.Insulation Low Voltage Final: 7.Final Inspection before Occupancy Health Where applicable,separate permits are required for Electrical,Plumbing,and Mechanical Installations. Work shall not proceed until the Inspector has approved the various stages of construction. Final: "Persons contracting with unregistered contractors do not have access to the guaranty fund" (as set forth in MGL c.142A). Fire Department Building plans are to be available on site Final: All Permit Cards are the property of the APPLICANT-ISSUED RECIPIENT TOWN OF BARNSTABLE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICAtION TOM,. OF BARNSTABLE I T s Map Parcel ✓ Application # � I °� � '111T, -7 tii t1 r- f o Health Division Date Issued Conservation Division Application Fee Planning Dept.' m'.,;'_ ;, _;;; . Permit Fee Date Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board Historic - OKH, _ Preservation/ Hyannis Project Street Address ` Village Itt- Owner ��<> ��- Address S k< Telephone S-& `1(-1 f71 Permit Request - Its ss�� 14 � Cc81l->� Square feet: 1 st floor: existing - proposed 2nd floor: existing proposed Total new Zoning District Flood Plain Groundwater Overlay Project Valuation j Construction Type Lot Size Grandfathered: ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, attach supporting documentation. Dwelling Type: Single Family Z Two Family ❑ Multi-Family(# units) Age of Existing Structure Historic House: ❑Yes ❑ No On Old King's Highway: ❑Yes ❑ No Basement Type: ❑ Full 0 Crawl ❑Walkout ❑ Other Basement Finished Area(sq.ft.) Basement Unfinished Area (sq.ft) Number of Baths: Full: existing new Half: existing new Number of Bedrooms: existing _new Total Room Count (not including baths): existing new First Floor Room Count Heat Type and Fuel: ❑ Gas ❑ Oil ❑ Electric ❑ Other Central Air: ❑Yes ❑ No Fireplaces: Existing New Existing wood/coal stove: ❑Yes ❑ No Detached garage: ❑ existing ❑ new size_Pool: ❑ existing ❑ new size _ Barn: ❑ existing ❑ new size_ Attached garage: ❑ existing ❑ new size _Shed: ❑ existing ❑ new size _ Other: Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization ❑ Appeal # Recorded ❑ Commercial ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, site plan review# Current Use Proposed Use APPLICANT INFORMATION (BUILDER OR HOMEOWNER) Name Telephone Number Address P® Box 52 License# West NIA 62679' Cell (508) 280-6964 Home Improvement Contractor# Email Worker's Compensation # ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO SIGNATURE DATE L/ / 7 1 7 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPLICATION # DATE ISSUED MAP/ PARCEL NO. ADDRESS VILLAGE OWNER DATE OF INSPECTION: FOUNDATION FRAME INSULATION FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL: ROUGH FINAL PLUMBING: ROUGH FINAL GAS: ROUGH ' FINAL FINAL BUILDING a DATE CLOSED OUT ASSOCIATION PLAN NO. I,N 3gC) A , el Cc Town of Barnstable °-' Regulatory Services HAM Richard'V.Scats,Director Building Uvision Tom Berry,Building Commissioner 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 wevw.town.barnstabtc_ma.ns Office: 508-8624038 Fax: 508-790-6230 Propert Owner Must CoMplete and Sign This Section If UsM no,A Builder James Fair as(hoer of the subject propcny hereby authon..eQf&r� Qf) to act on niybehalf, m all matters relative to work authorized by this building,permit application for: 23 Longwood Ave, Hyannisport, MA 02647 --- (Address of,R Poollfcnces and alarms are the responsibility of the applicant. Pools .are not to,be,fOed orutilited,before fence is installed and all fiz are p rformed and accepted. E-91TIM � by James Fair Signature of Owner Signature of Applicant James Fair .�.',�'int_'`3ame --- - •Print:Nazric March 29, 2017 Date I Q:FaRMS:O1b7.FR.?F"ISSIONPOOLS Massachusetts Department or Public Safety Board of Building Regulations and Standards License: CS-058633 Construction Supervisor MICHAEL.J MCCARTHY ^" P.O. BOX 62 WEST DENNIS MA 02670 Expiration: Commissioner 04/10/2018 1 Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation 10 Park PIaza - Suite 5170 Boston, Massachusetts 02116 Home Improvement Contractor Registration Registration: 169393 Type: Individual Expiration: 6/16/2017 Tr# 264961 MICHAEL MCCARTHY MICHAEL MCCARTHY P.O. BOX 52 ..... WEST DENNIS, MA 02670 -.............. ...___.........------- .._.-- Update Address and return card.Mark reason for change. scni :: 20m-05111 1_1 Address [— Renewal -_I Employment Lost Card .:J,��.�arrzoriai�u,cal(/��•��r'lul��,�/rr.:�rr, Office of Consumer Affairs&Business Regulation License or registration valid for individul use only OME I before the expiration date. If found return•to: (� MPROVEMENT CONTRACTOR Registration: . ' 69393 Type: Office,of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation Expiration: ;6%16i2t}17 Individual IO Park Plaza-Suite 5170 Boston MA 02116 . MICHAEL MCCARTHY r MICHAEL MCCARTHY ____------ 6 RANGLEY LN. SOUTH DENNIS,MA 02660 /"IureUndersecretary Not id with f h1 The CommonweaM ofMassaelaasemc Department ofh&*n rialAct'idMft 1 Congress S& y,Suite 100 DOWN,MA 02114-2017 wwm=ags.pY1diia Worlom'Compensation Insurance Affidavit:Huiblers/Conhietora/Eleetriciam/Plumbers. TO BE FILED WITH THE PERmII rrlNGI AUTNORITY. on Please Print Nme(eusineWorgaW=don&dividuaq: Address. 9,1,, Mari 5,Z City/StaWMp: we>?- n-,- )''�/�' 01C7k-Phone#: sz 1 -G Are you an ea~chock the to box: Y'YPe ofproject(requited): 1.E(.am a enVtoyer with employrea(fidl and/or perC thne).t 7. ❑New eonsimcdon 4 L[]I my a lAto wo,rs comp am sple p .hrsrmanc' n 11 yeas wodrhsg for Me in 1t. �lienaodeling WqWMQ 3.01 am a hmo w doing ryaall work a l(No worW comp.komence mqWm&j t 9. ❑Demolition 4.[]I ere a homeowner end will ba biro,conbaefara to conduct all work on my property. Twig 10 Building addition own bt of coofta re either have workers'compensada ice mea,or are sole 1 I Q Electrical repairs or additions nropridn whb no employees. I I Plumbing i o I am a general camacw and I haw ve hired the sub-contra ra listed on the attached sheet I u airs or additions Th atb�coutraotars have employees and have workers'comp.haws mce t a 3.01toof repairs 6.Q We are acmporadwt and its oilicess have exercised thelydght ofoxamptIon per MOL c. 14. Other 02,1l(4),and we have no employees.(No workers'comp.fitsumace mgaired] 'Any applicant thatebecks box#1 must also fill out thesacdon belaw sbowiog their workna'compeosaboa policy information. Hompowmrs who submit this aftvit Meeting they as dotes all wmk and then hire craWde comactrs must submit anew affWwk iadi wng such. tCoahiora that check this box ewer atmehed an addidwA shensbowmg the llama offt suo wnUamrs and stela whether or not ihow emidu have employees. ifdw subocowraotors have employees.they must provide their"*ers'wasp.policy member. lam an employer&at lsproW tg wogs'conymmWon finumucefor tW employees. Bdowis thepolicy m d job site Worma" Insurance Company Name: �. �� —��(.+v c•.9 h'Yc 1�.s. PcL•Gy:�or Self-ire.Lic.#:`J 5 L�7�I^7 S�7'� Expirstiaa Date: Job Site Address: City/StabdZip: Attach a copy ofthe morkers'compensation-polley declaration pap(showing the poligi number and exp4ratioa date). Faihn to secure coverage as required under MGL c.152,§25A is a criminal violation putddtable by a fine up to$1,500.00 and/or one-year imprisonment,as well as civil penalties in the form of a STOP WORK ORDBR and a fine of up to$250.00 a day against the violator.A copy of Ibis statement may be forwarded to the Office of Investigations ofthe DMA for' coverage verification. l do hereby cer*under an ofptufary that the h0row6uprow0d above h true and Correct S' D t OffloW me only. Do not w LV In this area,to be compWby cry or town ofaiaL City or Town: Permitlueense# Issuing AvAborityy(circle one): L Botird of Hesltti 2.Building Department 3.City/Town Cleric 4.Electrical Inspector S.Plumbing Inspector (Loder Contact Pelson: Phone#: MCCART9 OP ID:KS '4 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MMWDIYYYY) 12/20/2016 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsements. PRODUCER cc ATEACT Dennis Office Bryden&Sullivan Ins Agency PHONE FAX of Dennis Inc. •508-398-6060 A/c No:508-394-2267 485 Route 134,PO Box 1497 E-MAIL So.Dennis,MA 02660 ADDRESS: Dennis Office INSURER(SJ AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A:National Liability&Fire Ins INSURED Michael McCarthy INSURERB: Construction Inc PO Box 52 INSURER C West Dennis,MA 02670 INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY.PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTR ADD SUB POLICY IDDLTR TYPEOFINSURANCE POLICYNUMBER MMID POLICY LIMITS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ CLAIMS-MADE MOCCUR PREMISESrtrence $ MED EXP(Any one person) $ PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ GEML AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ POLICY JECT LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ OTHER. $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMB $ axident ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALLOWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS er accident UMBRELLALIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION$ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION X SPER TATUTE OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LUIBILITY ER A ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE Y/N V9WC747574 12115/2016 12/15/2017 E.L EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,00 OFFICEMMEMBER EXCLUDED? F N/A ' (Mandatory in NH) E.L DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,00 It yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,00 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,maybe attached if more space Is required) Michael McCarthy has Opted to Exclude himself for Workers Compensation benefits. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION CAPELIG SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN Cape Light Compact ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Box 427 Barnstable,MA02630 AUTHORI�DREPRESENTATIVE K+t,Q.k,ld (?, �' - - ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD i 1� � `' bra, r� �' �;8. ��. ��*s a '' .. �,y� fah ,�� t r$�� •�'' x rx+ •' r 41 .: A� Introduction Electronic signatures have become common practice in the United States, but confusion still persists regarding the law at a state and federal level. This document provides an pverview covering: 1) the legislation enabling electronic signature usage, and 2) the key legal factors arising in electronic transactions. What is an electronic contract? Before addressing the specifics of electronic signature legislation, it may be helpful to first make one point perfectly clear—under U.S. law, it is absolutely possible to form a contract electronically. The ESIGN Act and UETA have helped cement this conclusion, but in most cases this would have been true even before these were enacted. Electronic contr4�4ing is essentially contracting, and contract law fundamentals apply. Any contract, electronic or not, requires: 1. An offer, 2. Acceptance, 3. Consideration (some promised exchange of value), and 4. No Defenses (A contract, electronic or not, will not be enforced if a successful defense can be raised. For example, if an element of the contract is unconscionable or violates public policy, or if one of the contracting parties is too young to create a contract) The most important contribution of ESIGN and UETA is establishing that electronic record satisfies the legal requirement that certain documents be in writing. This whitepaper was drafted by the staff of DocuSign,Inc.,in August 2014.It is intended as educational material only, and is not a substitute for professional legal advice.Please contact leoalna docusion.com with any questions. O 2015,all rights reserved. 1 �+ n �3 a , it :+ 4. 'i '�t x ` _ ,FF6a• E 7Efi "." sue .v � � � � `a€any v �».q !. a fs a+'� tYa +�.,uzs _;. �.� Fa ..s. ' , .�yqu '_ ^.:rz.�': -" ,'" x<4` j# 3 PART I _ LEUSLAMN, The Eectronuc Segnatures un OoM and Natbnal Commerce Act (ESIGN) On October 1, 2000, the(SIGN Act became effective in the United States and is codified at 15 USC § 7001. ESIGN preempts any state laws to the extent they aren't consistent with it. ESIGN implements a national uniform standard for all electronic transactions and encourages the use of electronic signatures, electronic contracts, and electronic records by providing legal certainty for these instruments when parties comply with its standards. This legislation establishes that electronic communication and contracts are equivalent to their paper cousins. A more detailed description follows, but at a high level, the key elements are: o A contract may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because of its electronic form. If a law requires a record to be in writing, an,electronic record satisfies the law. If a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law. ESIGN is intentionally neutral in terms of the type of technology used, and even goes so far as to specifically preempt any state law that proscribes specific technology. General Rule Regarding Electronic Transactions and records ESIGN provides as follows: "(1) a signature, contract, or other record relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form; and (2) a contract relating to such transaction may not be i denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because an electronic'signature or electronic record was used in its formation." i This establishes a baseline rule that electronic transactions are no less valid than their paper counterparts. Although case law on ESIGN is fairly limited; courts that have examined it have consistently confirmed its broad effect'A summary of j relevant case law is provided in Appendix A to this document. Electronic Signatures I Electronic signature is defined to "mean an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record." The broad definition of"electronic signature" was intended to allow many types of technology and methods for signing electronically, while maintaining legal compliance. An electronic-signature can be just about anything produced by electronic means (e.g., a symbol, result, or consequence), which has been created electronically in order to demonstrate 2 f .. E t x z �:��Ss� —� ,�'a _ .:.: '+, .,�, `I'� � ✓ .��'3" '.i.��s �`�'r.q mql � �a+� .� #+::fit �t �,� '� x r e '�."� � I 4 alk E a party's intent to sign an electronic record. Specific examples of electronic signing include: • entering a password or personal information number (PIN);' • typing a name where indicated (or prompted) via computer keypad;3 • responding to telephone keypad instructions (e.g., press 3 to agree or 5 to hear this menu again);" i • clicking a button or check box;' or • responding to an email thread in a manner that manifests assent.6 It is important to note that while all of these methods (and potentially many others) are equally valid as signatures under ESIGN, they are not necessarily as useful in the context of enforcing an agreement. See the section titled "Common Methods of Electronic Contracting" for a discussion of some of the distinctions between some of these methods. Consumer Disclosures ESIG4tontains provisions intended to protect consumers engaged in electronic transactions. Where a consumer would otherwise be entitled to receive information in writing, electronic information will satisfy the requirement, so long as the consumer: • is provided clear and conspicuous notice of the consumer's ability to receive the information on paper • is provided with information about the hardware and software needed to access the information electronically • affirmatively consents to receive the information electronically. Consumers must provide this consent in a manner that "reasonably demonstrates"that the consumer can access information in the electronic form that will be used to provide the relevant information 7 A literal reading of ESIGN indicates that the consent itself must reasonably demonstrate the consumer's ability to access the information, but the legislative history indicates that the requirement might also be met by the consumer responding affirmatively to a provider's question about their ability to access, or by showing that the consumer actually accessed the relevant information electronically.8 If there is a change to the hardware or software requirements to access the relevant information, which creates a material risk that a consumer could thereby lose access to the information, the consumer must be notified of the new requirements, and of their right to withdraw consent to receive the information electronically. The reasonable demonstration requirement discussed above must also be met with respect to the new system requirements. Consumers may withdraw consent to receive information electronically, but such withdrawal does not affect the legal effectiveness of any transactions already completed. Although it is important to comply with the consumer disclosure requirements set out in ESIGN to the extent they apply, it is worth noting that ESIGN states that a failure to meet those requirements will not render any contract invalid or unenforceable solely on that ground. 3 ; I ' 4 q,, wl!...:r" ¢ +r •„' y"'� ,� ._lFs1 isF'�a S ' 't�%`" t *c+'d '#'«..," ; Illy `Y ® ® / r•rk .ro j3 �,i a ��ly,a.`i 4'+� '•' t ,��,�* � 3r A �' �.,�+i? u�3t � �`�.4�' ;'�'� F^n �G r� ° E"��n s# �r .� k s xa�x v**z`$�'-�� ` 1 $� � e•. i '•s' �X s1� 1 { a '� '�^i�A t ?+..y. Va... � �4-.Y�.d1M b,.`v�r..:p. d`q1 .R«+.i .�'.. 5 '4 T•..Tr It :{"P i.:.,,, :':�.� _ .�'1y%e�^b �a:.�^':��"^�^p�+�'T*f.nP<.c�L• # +,'74: *�+1...�,..tiW�^rd....R^:-. f I Electronic Records ESIGN provides that if any other law requires contracts or other records to be retained, that requirement may be met i i by retaining an electronic record of the applicable contract or record, so long as the electronic record accurately reflects the contract or other record, and that the record remains accessible to those entitled to access it in a form that can be f accurately reproduced for later reference. i If a contract or record is required by law to be in writing (for example, if it is subject to the Statute of Frauds), ESIGN permits it to be completed electronically so long as the electronic record is in a form that can be retained and accurately reproduced by all parties who are entitled to retain the contract or record for future reference. Uniform Eectronic Transactions Act (UETA) UETA was adopted in 1999 by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Law. i m 9 Forty-seven states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands have adopted Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA).9 Most of these states have made few, if any modifications to the model law (the most notable ! in terms of exceptions being California). j. I Only three states, New York, Illinois, and Washington, have maintained their own independently developed laws (which E pre-date UETA), but all three have amended or interpreted them to be consistent with UETA in their effect. A discussion of each of these 'outlier" state laws is set out in Appendix C. j i Despite the slight differences among the states, there is enough consistency to permit most businesses to adopt a single process for electronically signing agreements across the country. i i t Preemption - Which Law Applies? As noted above, state laws are preempted by ESIGN, except to the extent they are consistent with ESIGN. Moreover, i ESIGN specifically notes that state laws adopted from UETA are not preempted by ESIGN, except to the extent they contain exceptions from the model law that are inconsistent with ESIGN. ESIGN specifically preempts inconsistent state laws that were technology-centric. This eliminated or forced modification of state laws containing specific digital signature requirements, which could be met only with the use of PKI-based digital certificates. Does State Law ever apply to electronic transactions? f i The ESIGN Act applies to"any transaction in or affecting interstate commerce" (emphasis added). This raises the question of.what kind of transactions would not fall into its reach. The courts have historically taken a very broad view as to what "affects" interstate commerce, including many transactions where all parties are located in the same state. For example, if a transaction is part of a "class" of transactions that affect interstate commerce, the entire class can be regulated, even if many of the individual transactions occur solely in one state 10 Even the local real estate market has been found to be within the scope of the federal government's power to regulate commerce" In theory, it is certainly possible that a transaction could exist that would not be subject to ESIGN, but for practical purposes, it will likely apply to every contract entered by most companies. 4 i Y � 3 Although ESIGN and UETA provisions are similar, there are a handful of differences. Perhaps most notably, ESIGN includes additional requirements for contracting with consumers (discussed above) and is significantly broader in scope than UETA. ESIGN applies to "any transaction in or affecting interstate commerce," whereas UETA only encompasses transactions arising out of business, commercial, and governmental matters. In practice, the requirements of state and federal law are so similar that businesses generally need not even determine which law applies because they can easily comply with both. See Appendix B for an in-depth analysis of how ESIGN and UETA differ. Exceptions to ESIGN and UETA, and the role of other laves While ESIGN and UETA generally promote electronic contracting, a few categories of documents are excluded from the legislation. This does not mean these documents may not be completed electronically. They are simply not covered by ESIGN and/or UETA. As discussed below, many of the documents not covered by ESIGN and UETA,may be electronically completed under other legislation specific to those documents. Exceptions ESIGN does not apply to contracts governed by: laws governing the creation and execution of wills, codicils or testamentary trust; laws governing adoption, divorce, or other matters of family law; or the Uniform Commercial Code,as in effect in any State, other than sections 1-107 and 1-206 and Articles 2 (Sale of Goods) and 2A (Leases of Goods) In addition, ESIGN does not apply to: court orders or notices, or official court documents (including briefs, pleadings, and other writings) required to be executed in connection with court proceedings (though many courts permit electronically signed documents pursuant to their court rules );72 Any notice of- The cancellation or termination of utility services (including water, heat, and power); default, acceleration, repossession, foreclosure, or eviction, or the right to cure, under a credit agreement secured by or a rental agreement for, a primary residence of an individual; >> the cancellation or termination,.of health insurance or benefits or life insurance benefits (excluding annuities); or recall or a product,or material failure of a product that risks endangering health or safety; or any document required to accompany any transportation or handling of hazardous materials, pesticides, or other toxic or dangerous materials. r. 5 4 i t` � Ya 3r� `r t'Y kx � '$S s e yyy �•! g r + ra gar .yr :i ,r7 E„n ��,, � z,k� ��' .y�� ,+4 ? � �'aw �� °�^ �r+•n �� -� � � y �;�7�x ss � l:', Most state electronic signature laws (whether or'not modeled on UETA) contain similar exceptions. UCC Exclusions& Transferable Records One of the more notable exceptions in both ESIGN and UETA are contracts governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (other than sections 1-107 and 1-206 and Articles 2 (Sale of Goods) and 2A (Leases of Goods)). This exclusion reflects the fact that the UCC had already been revised to include provisions for electronic processes for the categories of transactions excluded.The following table summarizes the Articles of the UCC, and how electronic records relate to each: UCC CODE ELECTRONIC RECORDS USE EXAMPLE TRANSACTION Article 1: General Provisions N/A General §1-10711(renunciation ) Covered by ESIGN/UETA Waiver of rights after a breach of contract §1-20614(statute of frauds for Covered by ESIGN/UETA Sale of personal property personal property other than other than goods(e.g.IP) "Goods") Article 2. Sales Covered by ESIGN/UETA Sales Contract Article 2A, Leases Covered by ESIGN/UETA . Lease Agreements Article 3. Negotiable Instruments Duplicated in ESIGN Title 2,and UETA§16 Mortgage Notes Article 4. Bank Deposits N/A Checks Article 4A. Funds Transfers N/A EFT Systems Article S. Letters of Credit Allowed under UCC Art.5-10415 Bank Letter of Credit Article 6. Bulk Transfers N/A Liquidation Notice 1 Article 7. Warehouse Receipts/bill Allowed under Rev. Art.7-10216 Vehicle Title of Lading&Other Documents of Title Article S. Investment Securities N/A Securities Article 9. Secured Transformations Allowed under Rev.Art. 9-105 Chattel Paper 6 i i I r `k L "e 'fir e` ^•ize} ry�°, ",4d'' r r :'ars'i I `' .£ T � -.. ��t„.'�as ft ��4§'�"n ¢�;�:• q � �'5 _.y�t-�`�€. '�j. k�,7.,y�tf ,gg.: - f£+_�.�+,.. As noted in the chart above, UCC provisions.permit electronic records for certain document types. For example, section 9-105 sets out the rule for electronic chattel paper. In order to execute a note electronically, the system must be able to create a process that proves that: 1. The record is unalterable; 2. A person can have control over a transferable record; 3. A single authoritative copy can be shown to exist, which is unique and identifiable; 4. The authoritative copy indicates that the record has been transferred, and the person to which the record has been most recently transferred; 5. The authoritative copy is communicated to and maintained by the person asserting control; 6. Copies of the authoritative record can only be made with permission of the person asserting control; 7. Each copy made, and any copy of a copy is readily identifiable as a copy and that it is not the authoritative copy; 8. Any revision of the authoritative copy is readily identified as authorized or unauthorized. The UCC stipulates that if the electronic system enables such management of the note in electronic format, the electronic record shall have the same rights and defenses as equivalent paper records under the UCC. Government Exclusions ESIGN generally applies to government actors, but some special provisions apply to them. ESIGN permits federal and state agencies with rulemaking authority to interpret the Act in connection with statutes y they administer. The agency interpretations must be "consistent'with the general principles of ESIGN, may not impose additi, -�l requirements, and must be supported by a substantial justification. Agencies are permitted to require retention of paper records only if doing so is essential to attaining a compelling governmental interest relating to law enforcement or national security. Some agencies have interpreted ESIGN as expressly excluding government filings. For example, the SEC released guidance in 2001 indicating that it did not believe ESIGN applied to SEC filings, but nonetheless authorized the use of electronic records and signatures for most purposes" In practice, government agencies take a variety of approaches to electronic records, with some agencies accepting nearly everything electronically, and others accepting only selected documents, or establishing regulations that require special treatment of certain.documents. For example, the IRS has adopted a framework for the use of electronic signatures by Income Verification Express Services Participants, permitting electronic signatures on forms 4506-T and 4506T-EZ. The framework involves (inter alia) taking steps to authenticate the signer,obtain their consent, and obtain third party verification of the quality of the electronic signature process 18 The IRS also permits a number of other forms to be submitted with electronic signatures, including individual income tax returns, which may be signed using a PIN 19 ESIGN also permits government actors to impose specific technical requirements in order to do business electronically with them^a market participant (e.g. government procurement standards). This is discussed further in Part 2 below. 7 6 PART 2 ® ELECTRONIC CONTRACTING IN PRACTICE Common Methods of Electronic Contracting Click wrap. With click wrap agreements, end users.are required to click a button or check box indicating their agreement to a set of terms before being able to proceed with an electronic transaction, or gaining access to services or products.20 Courts generally enforce click wrap agreements, even when the�user has not read the contract terms, because clicking indicates that the end user had actual and constructive knowledge that certain agreement terms apply to the offered products and services.21 Browse wrap. Browse wrap terms are typically posted on website and are accessible via a hyperlink. These agreements may not involve an electronic signature at all, but instead`rely on some action of the user (like continuing to visit the website) to demonstrate "acceptance"of the terms. While the enforceability of browse wrap terms is much less certain than click wrap, they may be considered "accepted" when the end user (i) has actual and constructive notice of the applicable terms; and (ii) takes some action to avail herself of the products and services that are subject to those terms.22 The enforceability will turn on the particular facts, particularly the extent to which the website operator provided notice of the terms. For example, in Nguyen v. Barnes& Noble, Inc.,"the court found that the plaintiff had not agreed to the arbitration provision in Barnes& Noble's browse wrap agreement, because Barnes& Noble "did not position any notice even of the existence of its 'Terms of Use' in a location where website users would necessarily see it, and certainly did not give notice that those Terms of Use applied, except within the Terms of Use".(emphasis in original). Conversely, in Cairo. Inc. v. Crossmedia Services, Inc.24 the court determined that users had actual and constructive notice because they were presented with text that read: "[b]y continuing past this page and/or using this site, you agree to abide by the [t]erms of [u]se for this site . . ." Sionino with an Electronic Signature Sys tem. The method of electronic signature that most closely resembles the familiar paper contracting process is signing with an electronic signature system. Documents are prepared by the sender within the system, then presented to the intended signer, who may go through an authentication process to verify their identity. The signer may then review the document, and will be prompted to sign in the appropriate location(s). The form of the j signature may be a free-form mark made with a stylus or touch screen, or may be a text version of the person's name, I in a font selected by them as part of the signing process. Case law is strongly in support of the validity of this type of i process.21 ! Common Concerns about Electronic Contracting Most of the challenges that arise in enforcing and interpreting electronic agreements are not unique to the electronic t sphere. However, they may manifest themselves somewhat differently, or cause more concern in the electronic context l than they would otherwise, because lawyers and judges are less familiar with the technology. F The following sections attempt to shed some light on common concerns raised by attorneys about electronic signature. I 8 ` y i V yf �P '" "' N�r rr 7:P 4.,}'f tr ., �'® � o � �, ��S,,IL` u'*,�is,�`yti „� `''" a�'�`'�cs�-�`#'�� '9ak�y� a '+ ,S� 'E�,- .`�''• € Adrhissibility as Evidence It is important to begin by emphasizing that electronic records are absolutely admissible as evidence. Like any evidence, they must be authenticated, or the parties must agree to their authenticity. In the federal court system, Federal Rules of Evidence 901 and 902 govern authentication. Courts have permitted electronic data to be admitted under Fed. R. Evid. 901(b)(4), which permits authentication through distinctive characteristics of the document('Appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics, taken in conjunction with circumstances")26, and Fed. R. Evid. 902(7), which permits business emails to be self- z r authenticating with information showing the origin of the transmission or other identifying marks (e.g. company logos and email addresses).27 ! F I Confusion sometimes arises in connection with requirements that an "original" document be produced, since the concept of an "original" is not very meaningful in the electronic context. Fortunately this is addressed in the definitions in the 4 Federal Rules of Evidence—Fed. R. Evid. 1001(d) provides in pertinent part that"For electronically stored information, € "original" means any printout—or other output readable by sight—if it accurately reflects the information." E Delivery - when is an electronic record "sent" and "received"? i ESIGN is largely silent regarding delivery or electronic records, but UETA provides a set of default rules (which be modified i by agreement of the parties): r An electronic record is considered "sent' when the following criteria are met: • The record is addressed or directed to an information processing system: "`" Specified or used by the recipient for receiving records of the general type being transmitted, and From which the recipient is able retrieve the record; • The information is in a form the recipient's system is capable of processing; and • The information leaves an information system under the sender's control, or, if the sender and the recipient are using the same system, enters a part of the system under the recipient's control.', I An electronic record is considered "received" when: • It actually arrives at a system to which the recipient has access for retrieving the record, • The system has been designated or actually used by the recipient for receipt of the type of record in question, and • The system is capable of processing the record. It is not necessary for the recipient to actually open or view the electronic record in order for it to be considered received! s i I 9 i ' e The UETA also provides that if one of the parties to a transmission is aware that a record was not actually sent or actually received, even though it met the criteria of the UETA's default rules, then the effect of the electronic record and its transmission is determined by other law.30 This provision cannot be modified by agreement of the parties. A few states have expanded on this provision, adding that a "bounceback" message will automatically prevent a message from being deemed sent or received.31 Most judicial decisions considering delivery of information via email, whether or not they relied on the UETA rules, have determined that if the sender's business records establish that an email was transmitted to the correct email address, a "rebuttable presumption" of delivery arises.31 Proving the Identity of the Signer As with any contract, an electronic contract will not be enforced if the identity of the party to the contract cannot be established. This can be challenging when parties are contracting remotely, either through electronic means, or by mail. The identity of the signer is an evidentiary issue, and can be proven in a variety of ways.33 For example, in Zulkiewski v. Am. Gen. Life Ins. Co.,the court found that the insurance company's authentication process, which involved association with an email address, and knowledge of certain personal information (e.g. mother's maiden name) were sufficient to establish the identity of the signer. Electronic security may also play a role in establishing identity. For example, in Kerr v. Dillard Store Services, the court declined to enforce an arbitration agreement purportedly signed by the plaintiff, because the defendant "did not have adequate procedures to maintain the security of intranet passwords, to restrict authorized access to the screen which .permitted electronic execution of the arbitration agreement, to determine whether electronic signatures were genuine or to determine who opened individual emails."34 i It is worth noting that, although there are potential pitfalls with an electronic signature process, it is often still superior to a paper-based system from an evidentiary standpoint. An electronic signature will frequently be associated with an email I address, IP, or other elements associated with the signer, where a contract sent by mail will only be associated with a ` I physical location (where others may reside) and a written signature (which may be forged). i Using Electronic Signatures with Government Agencies ! ESIGN is made applicable to federal and state governments.35 In practice, however, government agencies often decline to I accept.electronic records, or impose additional requirements upon them.36 ESIGN does not grant a right to parties to make electronic filings with the government, and it permits agencies to interpret ESIGN through the issuance of regulations. Some agencies have chosen to impose specific technical requirements, such as the use of public key cryptography, upon the agency's use of electronic signatures.- For example, the California Code of Regulations sets out"Criteria for State to Determine if a Digital Signature Technology Is Acceptable for Use by Public Entities," including a list of acceptable technologies that is much more restrictive than the open standard included in ESIGN. Over time, government agencies appear to be moving toward more acceptance of electronic contracting and electronic signatures, but they are doing so much more slowly than the private sector. 10 f aR Appendix NotaWe Case Lam Signed Writing Requirements Buckles Management, LLC v. InvestorDigs, LLC, No. 10-cv-00508-LTB-BNB, 728 F.Supp.2d (D. Colo. July,23, 2010) (finding that email may be sufficient to meet the signed writing requirement under the statute of frauds, but that in this case it did not meet the definition of an electronic signature under ESIGN because the sender did not intend to be bound by the terms); Kaufman v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.,No. No. 05-cv-02311-WDM-MEH, 2007 WL 437641 (D.Colo.2007) (finding .that an automated signature on a written letter could meet the statute of fraud requirement precluding dismissal); Barwick v. GEICO, 2011 Ark. 128 (Ark. 2011) (holding that the plain language of the Arkansas UETA authorized the use of electronic records and signatures to satisfy the requirement under Arkansas insurance law that medical benefits coverage could only be rejected by a signed "writing"); Naldl v. Grunberg, 80 A.D.3d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2010) (ruling that New York Statue of Frauds may be satisfied by an electronic writing and electronic signature because, among other reasons,the Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ESRA) of the New York State Technology Law has incorporated the substantive prcyisions of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN), which allow for such electronic records and signatures); Johnson v. Astrue, No. CIV S-08-0182 GGH, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130558 (E.D. Cal. June 18, 2009) (ruling that Electronic signatures are not"rubber stamp signatures" as prohibited in the Code of Federal Regulations, and as such, electronic signatures meet the requirements for submitting examination reports under CFR for disability insurance claimants). I I Attribution.of Electronic Signature and Proof of Content Labalo vs. Best Buy Stores, L.P., 478 F.Supp.2d 523 (2007) (finding that although a valid electronic signature existed, it 1 was not clear whether the signer had actual knowledge of the contract terms that the signature purportedly evidenced agreement to); Zulkiewski v. Am. Gen. Life Ins, Co, No. 299025, 2012 Mich. App. LEXIS 1086 (Mich. Ct. App. June 12, 2012 (finding that the insurance company's authentication process, which involved association with an email address, and knowledge of certain personal information (e.g. mother's maiden name) were sufficient to establish the identity of the signer); . k Kerr v. Dillard Store Services, No. 07-2604-KHV, 2009 WL 385863 (D. Kan. Feb. 17, 2009) (declining to enforce an arbitration agreement purportedly signed by the plaintiff, because the defendant "did not have adequate procedures I to maintain the security of intranet passwords, to restrict authorized access to the screen which permitted electronic execution of the arbitration agreement, to determine whether electronic signatures were genuine or to determine who opened individual emails"); Adams v. Superior Court[Adams v. Quicksilver, Inc.], No. G042012 2010 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1236 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. Feb. 22, 2010) (holding that an electronic signature could not be attributed to an employee because the system used did not have sufficient controls (i.e. it did not require a password, the record could be modified after the fact, it did not include an audit trail, etc)). 11 l: I` i - 1. <. � " �.31 v �� ,. � �c�^a,�e�y ,a"Et �'+ar �.* R )'�.-�,�� " �' 3'4tSad'�a. •� s � -"� - -� • � s ��",'��••,� �� :. � ,.� ro �r��R r+ ,ram ,r�`y��.� - �. � � #Lam"€, �sa� efie Electronic Signatures in the context of Elections Anderson v. Bell, 2010 UT 47 (Utah 2010) (holding that electronic signatures on a petition had been improperly rejected by the Lt. Governor, and that electronic signatures do not pose special concerns regarding fraud). Subsequently overridden by 2011 legislation (S.B. 165), banning outright the use of e-signatures on petitions for candidacy, ballot initiative', or party formation. r Ni v. Slocum, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1636 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 2011) (holding that the California Election code requirement that a signatory "personally affix" a signature is not met by electronic signature). Click wrap,and Browse wrap America Online, Inc. v. Super. Ct. (In re Mendoza), 108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 699 (Ct. App. 2001) (using the standard of review involving the most deferential abuse of discretion and shifting the burden of proof to party seeking to uphold forum selection clause contrary to California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CCLRA), the court of appeals affirmed the trial court by invalidating the Virginia forum selection clause in a click-through agreement based on public policy in (i) anti- waiver provision in CCLRA, and (ii) California consumer protection provisions, which would be substantially diminished in Virginia, but court of appeals did not explicitly rule on the validity of the click-through agreement),aff'g; Carpi v. Microsoft Network, L.L.C., 732 A.2d 528 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999) (holding a click-through agreement as expressly valid where network subscribers could click either box saying "I Agree" or "I Don't Agree" at any time while scrolling the adjacent terms of the membership agreement, which included forum selection clause at issue; registration occurred and charges were incurred after subscriber clicked "I Agree"; court drew analogy to plaintiffs pre-contractual opportunity to read the fine-print terms in Carnival Cruise Lines and refused to treat electronic and paper presentations of terms differently); In re Rea/Networks, Inc., No. 00 C 1366, 2000 WL 631341 (N.D. III. May 8, 2000) (holding a click-through agreement as expressly valid against procedural unconscionability challenge where the contested arbitration clause appeared in final paragraph entitled "Miscellaneous" along with provisions on choice of law and forum selection, in same font as rest of agreement, freely scrollable and viewable without any time restriction; User must agree to online license agreement before it can install software from Real Networks' website, but the opinion did not detail the method of assent; court also held that this particular electronic document was a "writing" under the Federal Arbitration Act); Scott v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 726 N.Y.S.2d 60 (App. Div. 2001) (granting DSL providers' motion to dismiss pre-certification class action for misrepresentation and holding that providers were not liable for false or deceptive conduct, breach of warranty, or breach of contract where the enthusiastic advertising copy elsewhere on the website was at odds with disclaimers of service quality in the agreement on the installation CD-ROM). Email as Electronic Signature Cunningham v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 352 S.W.3d 519, 530 (Tex.App. 2011) (ruling: "We decline to hold that the mere sending . . . of an email containing a signature block satisfies the signature requirement when no evidence suggests that the information was typed purposefully rather than generated automatically, that [the sender] intended the typing of her name to be her signature, or that the parties had previously agreed that this action would constitute a signature"); i Intl Casings Grp., Inc. v. Premium Standard Farms, Inc., 358 F.Supp.2d 863, 873 (W.D.Mo.2005) (holding that despite no typed name, each email message included "a header with the name of the sender," which was sufficient to satisfy the j signature requirement under Missouri's version of the UCC and Uniform Electronic Transactions Act). r 12 t E JIN Z3ev 3 x Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Hook v. Intelius, 10-CV-239(MTT), 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31879 (M.D. Ga. Mar. 28, 2011) (holding that screenshots regenerated from archive data (not actual images) are admissible and offer probative value in enforcing an online agreement); Lorraine v. Markel American Ins. Co., 241 F.R.D. 534, 538 (D. Md. 2007) (establishing generally that electronic evidence can be admitted, subject to a showing of reliability). For more information on the case, see http://Www.lexisnexis.com/ aoolieddiscoverv/LawLibrary/whitePaoers/ADI WP LorraineVMarkel odf Delivery of Electronic Records Rodng v. E"Trade Sec. LLC, 860 F. Supp. 2d 1035, 1043 (N.D. Cal. 2012) (finding that an email notice sent within a reasonable time before a fee increase was sufficient); In re Leventhal, No. 10 B 12257, 2012 WL 1067568 (Bankr. N.D. III. Mar. 22, 2012) (holding the concept that "a properly addressed item mailed to someone is presumed to have been received" applies equally to email); Abdullah v. Am. Exp. Co., No. 3:12-CV-1d37-J-34MCR, 2012 WL 6867675 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 19, 2012) ("As Defendant has provided evidence showing . . . email was properly delivered to Plaintiff, a rebuttable presumption was created that Plaintiff received that email."); Ball ex rel. Hedstrom v. Kotter, 746 F. Supp. 2d 940, 953 n. 10 (N.D. III. 2010) (presuming that because no evidence was presented to the contrary, the plaintiff had received and had knowledge of information sent to him by the defendant via i email); i f SEC v. Global Online Direct, Inc., No. 1:07-cv-0767-WSD, 2007 WL 4258231 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 29, 2007) (holding that email notice to investors are appropriate if the process creates a reasonable expectation that the investors will (1) receive notice, (2) understand what it relates to, and (3) make a knowing and deliberate decision to read or disregard the communication). k . l I F� F F[� 13 E {F I d,s A b� ,yi ® -y+• t.ys.�J E g„.t.�' � f€" `;� �wt� s ,�: « �' `'sue ' N�,�`Y�, '• j' y.:` i Appendix B e Comparison ®f MIGN and UETA (as drafted by the Uniform Lair 1. Quality of Drafting. UETA is better written, and therefore easier to follow and interpret. Compared to ESIGN, it will give relatively greater certainty to citizens and businesses. 2. Excluded State Laws. ESIGN explicitly excludes more state laws from its reach, but UETA gives the states the flexibility to exclude additional state laws. .Compare ESIGN 103 with UETA 3 a - c P 3. Government Affairs. UETA covers government affairs, rather than just the commercial transactions covered by ESIGN. Compare ESIGN 101(a), 106(13) and UETA 2(16). Its inclusion of government affairs would appear to provide the state's agencies with the enabling legislation that they may need should they choose to conduct their own business electronically. Because many state statutes and regulations implicitly or explicitly require that the government conduct its business in writing, and the enabling legislation for state agencies is silent with respect to electronic activity, UETA provides an essential foundation for the transition to e-government. 4. Consumer Protections. UETA does not contain explicit consumer protection provisions as set forth in section 103 of ESIGN, but it leaves in place existing consumer protection laws and makes clear that they will still apply in electronic transactions. UETA 5(b), (e); 8(a),(b), (d)(1)-(2); 15. ESIGN anticipates some of the consumer problems unique to electronic transactions, and deals with them explicitly, while UETA does not. 5. Record Retention. UETA enables parties_who are required to keep written records to have an agent keep the records for them. UETA 12(c) ESIGN lacks such a provision. 6. Electronic Agents. UETA is clearer and more specific with respect to this topic. Compare ESIGN 101(h) and UETA 14. 7. Insurance. ESIGN provides a liability exemption for agents or brokers. See ESIGN 101(j); UETA does not. 8. Record Retention. ESIGN forbids states to impose written record keeping requirements on persons required to keep records of particular transactions, unless the requirement of a written record serves a compelling government interest related to national security or public safety. ESIGN 101(b)(1); 101(d)(1); 101(d)(3);101(d)(4); 102(c); 104(c)(1); 104(b) (3)(B). UETA would permit states to require paper record keeping but only if they pass a law after UETA is enacted specifically permitting the same. UETA 7(c)(d); 12(f); 12(a)(1)-(2); 12(d)-(e). Given the preemptive effect of ESIGN, any such after-adopted legislation would probably have to meet ESIGN's test for written record requirements. 9. Additional Provisions. ESIGN does not contain provisions addressing the following issues, which are addressed in UETA: a) Temporal application (i.e. what transactions the statute will apply to). UETA 4 b) Parties' ability to vary some of the terms of UETA by agreement. UETA 5, 8(d), 10(4), 15(g) c) Attribution of electronic signatures. UETA 9 (a)-(b) d) Change or error in electronically conducted transactions. UETA 10 e) Rules governing time and place of sending and receipt of electronic records. UETA 15 f) Admissibility of electronic records and signatures as evidence. UETA 13 i 14 1 I S 7 a 4� t,rs. a! T *,,� 3i-�'4 F j `Frhz. i .,r R� i r-# .'a,. �5 t��C(�'�sx 2 -r3e.k wi Q"'� r ad�rt, dt�,-F"T k 10. Transferable Records. ESIGN limits transferable records to notes secured by real estate, while UETA would apply to a broader range of commercial paper. Compare ESIGN Title II and UETA 16. ` 11. Federally-Mandated v. Voluntary State E-Procurement. ESIGN appears to require government entities to use or accept electronic records and signatures in the procurement process where they engage in transactions affecting interstate or foreign commerce with private parties who choose to conduct business electronically (except with respect to a contract to t which the state is a party). See ESIGN 101(b)(2). In other words, ESIGN appears to require that state governments accept electronic record and signatures on all documents related to procurement processes except for contracts to which the 4 ' state is a party. ESIGN 101(b)(2); 102(b); 104(b) (4). (This follows because ESIGN states implicitly in section 101(b)(2) that states are required to accept electronic records or signatures except with respect to contracts to which states are parties. Furthermore, ESIGN explicitly exempts state procurement from only one of the two requirements that it imposes on states that have not adopted UETA and want to specify alternative means of conducting electronic transactions, see ESIGN i 102(b), and only one of the three requirements imposed on states exercising their interpretive authority by interpreting their laws and regulations in light of ESIGN, see ESIGN 104(b)(4). Both of these explicit exemptions for state procurement E extend only to ESIGN's requirement that states adhere to technological neutrality. Thus, provisions of state procurement I laws mandating the use of written documents "relating to" procurement transactions are preempted to the same extent as other laws and regulations requiring written documents, except to the extent that they apply to contracts entered by a state and/or specify the technology to be used in the conduct of the procurement process.) By comparison, UETA gives states the option to use and accept electronic records in such circumstances. UETA 5(a)(c), 18. Therefore, UETA provides states with far more flexibility in determining the degree to which they want to conduct business transactions (_ electronically, and the time frame during which they will migrate to electronic commerce. 12. Enabling E-Government. In addition, optional provisions of UETA, which do not appear in ESIGN, pertain specifically to states' creation and retention of their own electronic records, conversion of their written records to electronic records, acceptance and distribution of electronic records, and the interoperability of systems adopted by state governments to facilitate E-government. UETA 17-19. While section 17 of UETA does not appear to be appropriate because it could result in multiple interpretations of records retention laws by different agencies, sections 18 and 19 may provide needed guidance to state agencies faced with questions about their authority to conduct their own business electronically after UETA. I ( 15 i t } I 4 kR �� .*; - �ys�.�` �� '#^u ''*` "'F, '.., # -", •�` r.:.�':.' P'. k, a mow,. r a s x Li 8 q, Appendix C e Outlier states ® fflinois, New Yorke and Washington Illinois, New York, and Washington have not adopted UETA, but have passed their own legislation to support a commerce. Each state's law is summarized below. P illon®as The Illinois legislature adopted the Electronic Commerce Security Act37 in 1998. Although it has not been updated to mirror the language of UETA or ESIGN, it is similar to both in its approach. Most importantly, the ECSA provides that electronic records and signatures shall not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely on the grounds that they are in electronic form. 1, ECSA also explicitly provides for the admission of electronic records and signatures as evidence in legal proceedings, prohibiting the denial of admissibility on the sole basis that the record or signature is in electronic form. The ECSA states that it aims to "facilitate electronic communications by means of reliable electronic records," "facilitate and promote electronic commerce, by eliminating barriers resulting from uncertainties over writing and signature requirements," "minimize the incidence of forged electronic records, intentional and unintentional alteration of records, I I and fraud in electronic commerce," and "promote public confidence in the integrity and reliability of electronic records and i electronic commerce."38 The exceptions to the ECSA are somewhat different than those to ESIGN and UETA. As with the other e-signature laws, this does not mean that electronic signatures are prohibited, but they must be supported by some other law or common law principle. The exceptions to ECSA are: (1) when it would be "clearly inconsistent with the manifest intent of the lawmaking body or repugnant to the context of the same rule of law[.]" (emphasis added). The "manifest intent" referred to in the Act requires more than a i showing that a "signature" or that the document be "signed" is required. (2) "the creation or execution of a will or trust, living will, or healthcare power of attorney," and i (3) "any record that serves as a unique,and transferable instrument of rights and obligations." The law goes on, however, to state that electronic signature may suffice under the ECSA for a negotiable instrument or other ! conveyance when an electronic version of the record exists, and is "stored and transferred in a manner that allows for the existence of only one unique, identifiable, and unalterable original" and "can be possessed by only one person, and which cannot be copied except in a form that is readily identifiable as a copy." v Furthermore, ECSA differs from ESIGN and UETA-in its narrower definition of electronic signature and its distinct definition of electronic and digital signatures. An electronic signature is defined as"a signature in electronic form attached to or logically associated with an electronic record." ECSA doesn't explicitly include fax as a viable form of electronic signature, so there is some speculation that a transaction under Illinois law cannot be effected by fax unless the parties explicitly i agree that fax will have the same effect as other methods of signature.39 { i I. i I 16 I t 9 I - i r s, } fii. �. ,, tL + C" firm � sET4.: ' fit �_ �":� �i .r. �'r�'� -�i*;sa". a a ;� �a {��• , 'm-� { �``�"+" aa�� A digital signature is defined ! 1 [A] type of electronic signature created by transforming an electronic record using a message digest function and encrypting the resulting transformation with asymmetric cryptosystem using the signer's private key such that any person have the initial untransformed electronic record, the encrypted transformation, and the signer's corresponding public key can accurately determine whether the transformation was created using the private key i and whether the initial electronic record has been altered since the transformation was made. A digital signature ! I is a security procedure. Although ECSA includes an extensive discussion of digital signatures, they are not required for enforceability or admissibility into evidence. Like many states, Illinois may require digital signatures in some cases when contracting directly with the government or submitting documentation to government agencies. New York i New York adopted the Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ESRA) in 2000. ESRA is technology neutral, supports use of electronic signature and electronic records for business and personal use, and provides for the admissibility of electronic records into evidence. As described on the website of the New York State Office of Information Technology Services, } "[ESRA] provides that 'signatures' made via electronic means will be legally binding just as hand-written signatures now are. . . . There is now no doubt that electronic records have the same legal force as those produced in other formats such as paper and microfilm." Similar to ESIGN, ESRA defines electronic signature as"an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with intent to sign the record." ESRA originally did not apply to electronic transactions involving transfer of title due to death or incompetence, or to the appointment of fiduciaries, but the legislature expanded the scope of ESRA to include such transactions in 2012. As noted on the OITS website sited above: "Effective September 23, 2012, ESRA will allow the use and acceptance of electronic signatures and records with conveyances and other instruments recordable under Article Nine of the Real Property Law, and permit recording officers to electronically accept for recording or filing digitized paper documents or electronic records of real property instruments such as deeds, mortgages and notes, and accompanying documents." In the case of Naidi v. Grunberg'40 the New York Appellate Division confirmed that the New York Statue of Frauds may be satisfied by an electronic writing and electronic signature because, among other reasons_, ESRA has incorporated the substantive provisions of the ESIGN Act. d Washington The Washington legislature enacted the Washington Electronic Authentication Act (WEAA) in 1997. Originally,WEAA was limited in scope, conferring legal enforceability only on digital signatures (using PKI based digital certificates). However, the scope of WEAA was broadened by amendment in 1999 to also include electronic signatures, and to adopt the principle that 'electronic signatures[may]not[be]denied legal recognition solely because they are in electronic form. Like ESIGN and UETA,WEAA defines an electronic signature broadly as "a signature in electronic form attached to or logically associated with an electronic record, including but not limited to a digital signature." Likewise, electronic records are broadly defined as ".record[s] generated, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means for use in an information system for transmission from one information system to another." 17 E . i i t s �" s P y „yy `$J. r y + § 4t .�"s3. 4 eyp !IT IRZzz!! 9�`� +X+ �'<Jffih4"'� i`rt:. T52 AR MIA Al.> kw- Although -k �, not in strict conformance With ESIGN and UETA, WEAA must be interpreted consistently with prevailing legal interpretations of key concepts common to all three, including a definition of electronic signature that transcends specific technical constraints. Nothing in WEAA prevents this, and more importantly, the WEAA faces preemption by the federal statute if WEAA is interpreted to be more restrictive. Digital signatures, though not required under WEAA, are discussed at length in the statute. Part of WEAA's original purpose was to establish standards for"certificate authorities" (CAs). The state certifies these entities to issue digital certificates—hardware-based tokens—to individuals so they can identify themselves in online transactions. The stature also imposed standards for how CAs identify individuals and issue credentials to them. Once issued, the individual can use those credentials to effect a digital signature. A digital signature attempts to create a secure form of the electronic signature, with assurances that the receiving party will reasonably know that the digitally signed document has not been altered and is attributable to the sender. A digital signature under WEAA is defined as: An electronic signature that is a transformation of a message using an asymmetric cryptosystem such that a person having the initial message and the signer's public key can accurately determine (a) whether the transformation was created using the private key that corresponds to the signer's public key; and (b) whether the initial message has been altered since the transformation was made. When Washington passed its law, the purpose of CAs and digital certificates were to encourage the public to get comfortable with electronic commerce. However, they failed to emerge as a viable means of transacting business online, mostly due to the common consensus that the small amount of extra assurance was not worth the added time, expense, and hassle of requiring signers to buy their own certificates. Online transactions are supposed to be timely; however, with the continuously emerging online authentication technologies, a digital token for standard transactions became unrealistic. Like many states, digital signature requirements in Washington may be relevant in the context of dealing directly with state agencies, but for commercial agreements, the digital signature elements of WEAA generally do not have any impact. V 18 t x. �� FOOTNOTES C®NT, "Nguyen v.Barnes&Noble,Inc.,No.8:12-cv-0812-JST(RNBx),2012 U.S. Dist.LEXIS 122455(C.D.Cal.Aug. 28,2012). 34Cairo,Inc. v. Crossmedia Services,Inc.,No.04-04825,2005 U.S. Dist.LEXIS 8450(N.D.Cal.Apr.1,2005). 28See,for example,Newton v.American Debt Service,854 F.Supp.2d 712(N.D.Cal.Feb 22,2012) (finding the plaintiff had entered into a contract that she had signed using DocuSign,but declining to enforce it on other grounds). 28United States V. Safavian,435 F.Supp. 2d 36,40(D.D.C.2006),rev'd on other grounds,528 F.3d 957(D.C.Cir.2008)(admitting emails based on the email addresses contained in the'to"and"from"fields,and other identifiable material such as the subject matter,signatures,and other personal and professional references). 37Scheuplein v. City of W. Covina,No.B206203,2009 Cal.App. Unpub.LEXIS 7805,at'26-27(Cal.Ct.App. 2d Dist.Sept.29,2009)(finding emails to be authenticated when accompanied with a declaration that the emails were retrieved from the company's computers and the printouts were accurate representations of the retrieved messages). 38UETA§15(a). 39UETA§15(e). 3oUETA§15(f). 91See,for example,Pa.Stat.Ann.,tit.73§2260.115. 32See,for example,American Boat Co.,Inc. v Unknown Sunken Barge,418 F.3d 910,914(8th Cir.2005)(holding that the same presumption of delivery applicable to paper communications should apply to email); Kennell v. Gates,215 F.3d 825,829(8th Cir.2000) (absent evidence to the contrary, e-mails properly dispatched via a generally reliable method are presumed delivered and received). €€ i aeZulkiewski v.Am. Gen.Life Ins. Co.,No. 299025,2012 Mich.App.LEXIS 1086(Mich.Ct.App.June 12,2012). 39Kerr v Dillard Store Services,Inc.,2009 WL 385863(D. Kan.Feb. 17,2009). 3315 U.S.C.§7004. 3eFor example,the Food and Drug Administration has released regulations regarding electronic creation,maintenance;and submission of information subject to FDA regulations,which are set out at 21 CFR Part 11 375 ILCS 175. 395 ILCS 175/1-105. b9See discussion in"Is an"E-Signature"Legally Enforceable"authored by A.Patrick Andes,Associate Attorney,Bellas&Wachowski,accessed 6/13/14 at t httg://www.bellas-wachowski.com/lawyer-attorney-1283876.html f 9080 A.D.3d 1 (NY App Div 2010). 3 } 6'*a E �•��1`3. �O �, � p'fa F .I .� S8�Y' eT � �'F zl ..� E 7'4 aq,x "B. a oo. e. o ®e .e- i• a • �� ;' K�fi�i' .�,. � � -�f'�' ;.. _. - ..� • e -e o a a o •o a os. t � .. 1 1 e s S ( � �f .�`�x�" '"�,i �� a� ✓�' ;� rnt a„��5 rt`� t tz �� e�k> � �'� a F t �� s� i ( FOOTNOTES 'See,for example,Specht v.Netscape Comm'cns Corp.,306 F.3d 17,26 n.11 (2d Cir.2002) (assessing whether clicking to download software created 4 enforceable agreement to arbitrate,and noting that the matter of whether"the agreement is a'written provision'despite being provided to users in a downloadable electronic form . . .has been settled by[the E-Sign Act],"although ultimately finding that consumers'clicking"yes"in the context presented in that case did not manifest assent to license terms). 'See,for example, the Internal Revenue Service('IRS)Fact Sheet 2011-07(htto://www.irs aov/uac/T6xiayers-Who-File-Electronically-Must-Use-e- Si natures,explaining the use of a PIN as e-signature on a tax return. 'See,.e.g.,Haywood Securities,Inc. v. Ehrlich,149 P.3d 738(Ariz.2007). f "See,for example, opinion number 04-08-15 of the Office of the General Counsel of New York,issued August 18,2004,interpreting ESIGN to allow a life insurance agent have an applicant sign a life insurance application by the entry of their social security number into an interactive voice response (IVR)system using a telephone keypad. http://www.dfs.ny.gov/insurance%gco2004/rg040815 htm 'See,e.g., United States v.Hair,178 Fed.Appx 879,882 n.3(11th Cir.2006). ) °See,e.g.,Int'I Casings Grp.,Inc.v.Premium Standard Farms,Inc.,358 F.Supp.2d 863,873(W.D.Mo.2005) 71S USC§7001 (c)(1)(C)(ii), [ 8146 Cong.Rec. 55282(daily ed.June 16,2000) (colloquy between Senators Abraham and McCain), 'National Conference of State Legislatures.http://www ncsl org/research/te"lecommunications-and-information-technology/uniform-electronic- tt€ transactions-acts.asox 70See Perez v. United States,402 U.S. 146(1971)(sustaining the application of a federal"loan-sharking"law to a local culprit because the practice of loan-sharking,in general,impacted interstate commerce). "Russell v. United States,471 U.S.858,862(1985)(holding that an apartment rental"unquestionably"affects interstate commerce,and that"the local rental of an apartment unit is merely an element of a much broader commercial market in real estate"). E "See,for example,the"Administrative Procedures for Filing,Signing,and Verifying"provided by the U.S.District Court for the Western District of Virginia at htto://www-vawd-uscourts.o v/media/3355/ecfprocedures.odf,permitting electronic attorney signatures. 13This section was renumbered as section 1-306 following the 2001 amendments to Article 1 of the UCC. See hip://www.uniformlaws.orn/shared/docs/ uccl/uccl am01.odf 14This section was removed from the UCC in the 2001 revision to Article 1,but the provision still exists in many states'adoption of the UCC. 76For an analysis of the use of electronic processes for letters of credit,see the guidance provided by the Office of the Chief Counsel for International Commerce,U.S. Dept.of Commerce,in July 2002,available at: http://www.osec.doc.gov/ogc/occic/letcred.html 'sSee discussion of the revisions to Article 7 dealing with electronic records at htto://www.unftrmlaws.org/ActSummary.a$px7title=UCC%2n_art_icle_`/_2_n_ 7,%2ODocuments%20of%2OTitle%200/u282003%29 The revisions have been adopted by most states. "Application of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act To Record Retention Requirements Pertaining to Issuers Under the Securities Act of 1933,Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Regulation S-T,66 FIR 33175(June 21,2001). 1'Accessed at http://www.irs.00v/Individuals/Income-Verification-Express-Services-%281VES%29--Electronic-Signature-Requirements 'OIRS Publication 1345. 30Kwan,et. al., v. Clearwire Corporation, No.C09-1392JLR,2011 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 150145,at"1 (W.D.Wash. Dec.28,2011). "See generally,I-Systems,Inc. v.Software,Inc. Quantum Management Systems,LLC,No.02-1951 (JRT/FLN),2005 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 47592 (D.Minn. Mar. 7 2005). "Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.,306 F.3d 17,25(2d Cir.2002)citing Windsor Mills,25 Cal App.3d at 992(2001)quoting Restatement (Second)of Contracts§19(1981). See also,Register.com,Inc.v.Verio,Inc.,356 F.3d 393,429 (2d Cir.2004) (holding that provisions disclosed solely through browse wrap agreements are typically enforced if the website user had actual and constructive knowledge of the site's terms and conditions, and has manifested assent to them). 19 { 6 i Y N C W u W Al Belanger Operations Supervisor RIS E _ T_(508)568-1926 x6604 `�M(508)505-0846 afbelanger@RISEengineering.com 5 Dupont Avenue South Yarmouth,MA 02664 A division of Thielsch Engineering,Inc. www.RISEengineering.com -,V -_ - ..a' ':'�L xi§. s:. k �'S�R�?� 'i�+'l"�. t�� ^ 'R 4a`''.;�`.��,3 t �k� •.,,�. `F�1��,' ,�f �y�s��p•�„ a��' ��*v° 4 '��w ,'� ��+a g ^r 5:�m �� ! .�e .::�y, F,�* �� x.�.. �"� �, :i a�•r �a �'; i s� � � �...'•s � xr lA o :_��+ �� '�'-�'d 3 44� "._,�,. 4,..s �..�� ,t t��j �., r+% ,t .� ��: ��+ �•s '� �.r`�y ,g. t" '4u ,C w !• z'; $r X 7- '}. k.t'=vw, .r; » ;ar �a. -�3 , f. -, . 'yr Az,r { .ZXp` , �,. �i 5 x� + #� ? + �� ate` ,z�* ® ® i }' "��, ,� e g t��1 '`''� ^' `;�`-d�..F'd-x i. s '•Y'� = �." � r�.--:'`' '+�=e .,i�i+e�r �� x� _ �:- 3�--�•sr ;r,, i Introduction " Electronic signatures affixed with the right technology.can provide superior evidence to paOS4, sed signatures. I � l Documents that are digitally sealed with industry standard technology certify that the electronicls�gnature is valid and that the document has not been tampered with since it was downloaded. DocuSign, for example, maintains an automated history of each and every viewing, printing, sending, signing, or declining activity. DocuSign's service generates a court admissible certificate of completion that provides proof of the signing process to all transaction parties. This certificate includes information from the audit trail to establish the who, what, when E and how of the document signing ceremony. 6 DocuSign has surveyed all reported cases in the United States that mention DocuSign and found that courts consistently+find that electronic signatures are valid when they meet key requirements. The findings indicate that documents that are signed electronically with the right technology are typically admissible as evidence in a trial. More importantly, the findings make clear that contracts formed with DocuSign signatures can be binding and enforceable. Some of the rulings highlight the risks of relying on electronic signatures affixed through other means not facilitated by a commercial electronic signature process. A. Rulings That Support Documents Electronically Signed With DocuSign. 1. Pavlov v. Debt Resolvers USA, Inc., 907 N.Y.S.2d 798 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2010) This case was about a customer who sought a refund of the money he paid to a debt resolution service, Debt Resolvers the defendant. The defendant argued that Pavlov was not entitled to a refund because the agreement he signed using DocuSign did not permit him to obtain one. The court, a N.Y. City Civil Court, voided the contract as unlawful because the defendant provides services that require a license in NY and the defendant was not licensed. However, the court found that the parties, who used DocuSign to apply signatures to some or all of their agreements, formed a binding contract. 2. Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc., 854 F.Supp.2d 712.(N.D.C.A. 2012) In this case the plaintiff, Newton, alleged that the defendant, American Debt Services (ADS), promised to cut her credit card debt in half, but never contacted her creditors and did not settle any of her debts. Newton brought several claims and sought to establish a class action. ADS argued that Newton formed a contract with ADS that required her to arbitrate her claims. Newton, who signed an agreement with ADS using DocuSign, challenged the validity of the agreement. Newton argued that she did not see or read the agreement to arbitrate so it should not apply.She also argued that if it applied, it should be voided for unconscionability. The'federal trial court found for Newton when it refused to enforce the arbitration clause on grounds of unconscionability. Before reaching its conclusion the court discussed the validity of electronic signatures and the specific process utilized by DocuSign. The court cited the ESIGN Act and noted that an electronic signature that complies with the Act is legally binding. The court's ruling was based on its finding that Newton "assented to the contract and the arbitration clause, and that the arbitration clause is binding on all parties to the contract." 6 I i I R' 34 w.+a' �.3 t;t' • .r�,�, 4 % R'�. S, ;?T`? Tl.� �j r Y kk ,i+_`[�,� ''I; �y -� e ,55 X •x"` €. ��.' •t;�' ��.";. -� �.w�.�„ari'� � � -e�� "ry ,-y.,#°. x+r�' ,,.� -�:s u.,��,'ww � � r�>+i�,,�� 3,lfi. '` "�``xr} *F.: a, i ��i "�M � �£3� �Y,t,.li :�f... aaa'� ��. �d4,,�E-4�i�S ,w..x � 3 �f � ��x .r4 �''r-t k v�•'i�` •¢ '+'� S '� 4, `.pt, x'r {'�+ �✓' �` ��°Er , g: ��- ..v." ��r�=`,��``�',�q�", ' �t��V4,. � y �r • � #v'�r '" s a,. ,�''�'at4 :�r�'�t 3. Flatter of ADHY Invs. Props. LLC v Garrison Lifestyle Pierce bill LLC, 41 Misc. 3d 1211(A) i (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013) In this case Garrison Lifestyle sought to enforce a contractual requirement to arbitrate after ADHY refused to close on the purchase of properties won in a successful bid on Auction.com. ADHY claimed that its principal did not sign the sales agreements, which contained a requirement to arbitrate. , The state trial court ruled that the arbitration agreement was binding on the petitioner (ADHY) and denied the application to stay arbitration. To reach its decision the court reviewed Auction.com's practice of using DocuSign to secure signatures for the relevant contracts. The court reasoned that although petitioner did not sign the agreements (his.assistant did), petitioner ratified or adopted as his own the acts of his agent, his assistant. As a consequence the contracts, signed with DocuSign and requiring arbitration, were binding. 4. Derrick Fenley v. Rite Aid Corp., 2014 Cal. Super: LEXIS 156, '5-6 (Cal. Super. Ct. July 2014) This case was about a collective wage and hour dispute. At one point the court had to determine the 1 admissibility of several declarations that were "DocuSigned" (as the court put it). Ultimately, the court ruled that several of the "DocuSigned" declarations complied with the requirements of section 2015.5 but not those of CA Rules of Court, Rule 2.257(a) which permits electronic filing of a declaration but only after the declarant signs a printed original. In reaching its decision the court provided some close analysis of the use i of DocuSign to affix an electronic signature. The court explained that CA Code of Civil Procedure section 2015.5 permits a declaration made under { penalty of perjury to be used as evidence if it is subscribed by the declarant and clarified that "subscribed" means to sign with one's own hand. The court noted that the declarants who "DocuSigned" used a secure electronic signature system to provide unique signatures by touch screen or mouse. The court found that the method does not conflict with section 2015.5's subscription requirement because it still relies on the E individual's own hand to create the mark of the signature. In additional analysis, the court noted that because of the uniqueness of the DocuSign signatures and the measures that DocuSign takes to prevent tampering and repudiation, the DocuSign signatures appear to comply with California Government Code section 16.5(a), regarding use of digital signaes in communications with public entities. S. Woods v. Vector Mktg. Corp., 2014 U.S. Dist.. LEXIS 121165 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2014) � This case was about alleged failures to pay minimum wages. Plaintiff, Woods, and others sought to bring a class action. The defendant, Vector, argued that the court should enforce the agreement to arbitrate (on an individual basis) contained in the contracts signed by plaintiffs. The federal trial court reasoned that because the defendant's Sales Representative Agreement (SRA) included an agreement to arbitrate disputes on an individual basis, the defendant's motion to compel arbitration should be granted. In reaching its decision the court reviewed defendant's onboarding process and determined that the SRA, an agreement between plaintiff and defendants that plaintiffs signed using DocuSign, resulted in binding contracts that the court should enforce. 6. Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167281, *24 (D.N.J. Dec. 3, 2014) 1 This was a case about a customer's dispute with various related debt resolution services. After some activity in the trial court and an order by that court denying defendant's motion to compel arbitration, the I 21— ',Fi a. M °d' °"> ` is c f Y i i ° wA�g�,, ((• t yk tk , � tis. R4+� , aSF:,F,''rCr ,"°-"<• "r :.' 'rk ., t a x $,. 'go-+-a Aa'' a�r t - Fz .`w ; 3. Matter of ADHY Invs. Props. LLC v Garrison Lifestyle Pierce Bill LLC, 41 Misc. 3d 1211(A) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013) In this case Garrison Lifestyle sought to enforce a contractual requirement to arbitrate after ADHY refused to close on the purchase of properties won in a successful bid on Auction,com. ADHY claimed thats principal did not sign the sales agreements, which contained a requirement to arbitrate. The state trial court ruled that"the arbitration agreement was binding on the petitioner (ADHY) and denied the application to stay arbitration. To reach its decision the court reviewed Auction.com's practice of using DocuSign to secure signatures for the relevant contracts. The court reasoned that although petitioner did not sign the agreements (his assistant did), petitioner ratified or adopted as his own the acts of his agent, his assistant. As a consequence the contracts, signed with DocuSign and requiring arbitration, were binding. 4. Derrick Fenley v. Rite Aid Corp., 2014 Cal. Super. LEXIS 156, '5-6 (Cal. Super. Ct. July 2014) This case was about a collective wage and hour dispute. At one point the court had to determine the admissibility of several declarations that were "DocuSigned" (as the court put it). Ultimately, the court ruled that several of the "DocuSigned" declarations complied with the requirements of section 2015.5 but not those of CA Rules of Court, Rule 2.257(a) which permits electronic filing of a declaration but only after the declarant signs a printed original. In reaching its,decision the court provided some close analysis of the`use of DocuSign to affix an electronic signature. - The court explained that CA Code of Civil Procedure section 2015.5 permits a declaration made under i penalty of perjury to be used as evidence if it is subscribed by the declarant and clarified that "subscribed" means to sign with one's own hand. The court noted that the declarants who "DocuSigned" used a secure electronic signature system to provide unique signatures by touch screen or mouse. The court found that the method does not conflict with section 2015.5's subscription requirement because it still relies on the individual's own hand to create the mark of the signature. In additional analysis, the court noted that because of the uniqueness of the DocuSign signatures and the measures that DocuSign takes to prevent tampering and repudiation, the DocuSign signatures appear to comply with California Government Code section 16.5(a), regarding use of digital signatures in communications with public entities. 5. Woods v. Vector Mktg. Corp., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121165 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2014) This case was about alleged failures to pay minimum wages. Plaintiff, Woods, and others sought to bring a class action. The defendant, Vector, argued that the court should enforce the agreement to arbitrate (on an individual basis) contained in the contracts signed by plaintiffs. The federal trial court reasoned that because the defendant's Sales Representative Agreement (SRA) included an agreement to arbitrate disputes on an individual basis, the defendant's motion to compel arbitration should be granted. In reaching its decision the court reviewed defendant's onboarding process and determined that the SRA, an agreement between plaintiff and defendants that plaintiffs signed using DocuSign, resulted in binding contracts that the court should enforce. 6. Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167281, *24 (D.N.J. Dec. 3, 2014) This was a case about a customer's dispute with various related debt resolution services. After some activity in the trial court and an order by that court denying defendant's motion to compel arbitration, the - t ttr-' .+K �?i,'g, x, �:swi °. ^-i'r�:..$ _6,§ wrC9 "' i n x s t Y A w d .`" '' .a '� tj '•'t- 'r ,,"' `` is ,'fir "k -� s �� o +sz, a ,��a Sz�, � Y� ,r �*ca'1t �' ��•;' �'``'s�,. � s+ "s �$ � �^ s, �x'` °�a= *y�•jig � ® � � ,g " ® ® ®r a ®® © j l:;,.. `w�,�a-aG«"fir .? ®e ® •®r� J,% r ,.�t -+.'. �'� ' �.,��x as• "��;` ,� . ate,;' y�r � � Y. .� k -�. � Y+`'" �' � ��` :Ca' A .a,' -• d.:'6� t` r�' ,� ,�'" c` x '�'a �&+d� � ,;,� .4 � �,''�,'. atl .s :r�r� E r"'$P 3: Introduction Electronic signatures affixed with the right technology can provide superior evidence to paper-based signatures. Documents that are digitally sealed with industry standard technology certify that the electronic signature is valid I and that the document has not been tampered with since it was downloaded. DocuSign, for example, maintains an automated history of each and every viewing, printing, sending, signing, or declining activity. DocuSign's service generates a court admissible certificate of completion that provides proof of the signing process to all transaction parties. This certificate includes information from the audit trail to establish the who, what, when and how of the document signing ceremony. DocuSign has surveyed all reported cases in the United States that mention DocuSign and found that courts consistently find that electronic signatures are valid when they meet key requirements. The findings indicate that documents that are signed electronically with the right technology are typically admissible as evidence in a trial. More importantly, the findings make clear that contracts formed with DocuSign signatures can be binding and enforceable. Some of the rulings highlight the risks of relying on electronic signatures affixed through other means not facilitated by a commercial electronic signature process. A. Rulings That Support Documents Electronically Signed With DocuSign. 1. Pavlov v. Debt Resolvers USA, Inc., 907 N.Y.S.2d 798 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2010) This case was about a customer who sought a refund of the money he paid to a debt resolution service, Debt Resolvers the defendant. The defendant argued that Pavlov was not entitled to a refund because the agreement he signed using DocuSign did not permit him to obtain one. The court, a N.Y. City Civil Court, voided the contract as unlawful because the defendant provides services that require a license in NY and the defendant was not licensed. However, the court found that the parties, who used DocuSign to apply signatures to some or all of their agreements, formed a binding contract. 2. Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc., 854 F.Supp.2d 712 (N.D.C.A. 2012) In this case the plaintiff, Newton, alleged that the defendant, American Debt Services (ADS), promised to cut her credit card debt in half, but never contacted her creditors and did not settle any of her debts. Newton brought several claims and sought to establish a class action. ADS argued that Newton formed a contract with ADS that required her to arbitrate her claims. Newton, who signed an agreement with ADS using DocuSign, challenged the validity of the agreement. Newton argued that she did not see or read the agreement to arbitrate so it should not apply. She also argued that if it applied, it should be voided for unconscionability. The federal trial court found for Newton when it refused to enforce the arbitration clause on grounds of unconscionability. Before reaching its conclusion the court discussed the validity of electronic signatures and the specific process utilized by DocuSign. The court cited the ESIGN Act and noted that an electronic signature that complies with the Act is legally binding. The court's ruling was based on its finding that Newton "assented to the contract and the arbitration clause, and that the arbitration clause is binding on all parties to the contract." ,ram } ri gg ""& '44- AFJ,® `T '® s„F'' - 97'; S+` �' 3i `.t k ',* t t. �,.i. L.n. f �t-✓�:� S '�` 3 � a p A .('l�a� �," "��^' b 3L•''s �C "�' � 2e J � '@ �` Aifi F that required him to arbitrate his claims. The court noted that the defendants did not show that the electronic signature purportedly affixed by plaintiff (using the defendant's internal HR computer system) could be attributed to plaintiff because it was the mere typing of a name and date without any additional verification steps. 2. J.B.B. Investment partners, Ltd. v. Fair, 232 cal. App. 4th 974 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 2014r__` This case arose out of a purported settlement agreement that one party wanted to enforce. JBB, the plaintiff, wanted to enforce the settlement agreement and pointed to defendant's name in text at the bottom of an email as evidence that the proposed settlement terms had, per the requirements of CA Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6, resulted in "a writing signed by the parties.". The state trial court agreed and ordered enforcement of the agreement; however, an appeal ensued. A state court of appeals in CA refused to enforce the settlement agreement. The court expressly agreed that a printed name or some other symbol might, in the right circumstances, be a signature under the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA); however, it held that the trial court erred when it concluded that defendant's printed name at the bottom of his e-mail response (to plaintiffs' settlement offer) was a signature under UETA. The court noted that in the email at issue it was not clear that the defendant printed his name with the intent to formalize an electronic transaction. The court indicated that had the sender facilitated the ability to sign electronically using DocuSign or other commercially available electronic signature software there would be no question about the recipient's intent to formalize an electronic transaction. Conclusion Electronic signatures are rapidly become the de facto standard in business and consumer transactions. As the cases above illustrate, electronic signatures offer real benefits when the technology used is designed to comply with key requirements including those in the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) and the Federal E-Sign Act. These electronic signatures, including those affixed with DocuSign, can form contracts that are binding and enforceable. They can also provide evidence that is superior to a paper-based signature. On a related note many courts are moving to electronic processes. In many states, court documents can now be submitted electronically, creating significant efficiencies for everyone who works in the courthouse, and saving taxpayers millions of dollars. So far, at least two dozen states have implemented statewide e-filing for attorneys, mostly for civil cases, according to the National Center for State Courts. In 2012, the Texas Supreme Court mandated e-filing for all civil cases statewide on a rolling schedule and the state is now seeing cases from start to finish that never touch paper. Jenni Bergal — Pew Charitable Trusts. Courts Plunge Into the Digital Age. (Dec. 8, 2014) htto://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-anal-ysis/blogs/stateline/2014/12/8/courts-plunge-into- the-digital-age. ,� •�" u �'°. :fix � � f a1B WE �� s a e ® e • e • • 0• •e e o •• e • 2 r. u pp i a h,"'� $a' �d .��.2 Si b$3�"i' '•' �.x 7 S � kk ' ' � � ..� 't '8 ,�.� � �f q � d s; Kv. a. AA case went to the.federal court of appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which includes PA, NJ and DE. The court did not question that a binding contract had been formed, but it did find that there were real questions about whether defendants had presented plaintiff with an agreement to arbitrate. The appeals court vacated the order denying arbitration and remanded the case to the trial court to oversee limited discovery relating to the defendant's motion to compel arbitration. After additional discovery and briefing, the federal trial court refused to compel arbitration because it found the arbitration requirements to be unconscionable and thereby unenforceable. However the court agreed that when the plaintiff signed agreements using DocuSign a binding contract was formed. 7. Sollner and Jacques v. Linton and Cerveilleira et. all.: Case rr CUD-13 644781 (Sup. Ct. CA — County of San Francisco 2014). This case was about whether a former property owner had the right to lease units when he entered specific leases. The plaintiffs disputed the date on which the leases were entered. The lease agreements in question were executed using DocuSign. Damon Dean, head of DocuSign mobile product management, was called to testify in the case as an expert witness. Mr. Dean provided the court with credible evidence, based on DocuSign technology, that defendant and the tenants were lying about the date when the lease agreements were actually signed. Because the documents were signed using DocuSign, plaintiffs' attorneys were able to show the precise moment the documents were created, electronically delivered and signed. In this case, DocuSign's certificate of completion showed that although the lease agreements were backdated to March 1, the lease documents were actually created on March 18th, delivered by e-mail to the tenants for their signature and signed by the defendants shortly before noon that same day. B. Two Rulings Recognizing the Validity of Certain Electronic Signatures But DecidingThat The Signatures at Issue (Neither Utilized DocuSign) Were Not Valid Electronic Signatures. 1. Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group, Inc., 232 Cal. App. 4th 836 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 2014) This case was about an employee's claims that his employer failed to pay overtime, properly account for hours worked, provide breaks, etc. The defendant, Moss Brothers, argued that Ruiz entered a contract in which he agreed to arbitrate his claims. In support of its argument Moss Brothers presented a paper copy of an agreement with text reading "electronic signature - Ernesto Ruiz" accompanied by a date. Moss C Brothers explained that Ruiz (and all other employees) was asked to log into an internal HR system where they reviewed and electronically signed the arbitration agreement. The trial court disagreed and Moss Brothers appealed. R The state court of appeals discussed the ESIGN Act and the requirements for authenticating a writing under California law. The court explained that one way to do so is to show the efficacy of a security procedure used to determine the individual to whom the electronic signature is attributable. The court cited to Newton (discussed.above) where the court found that electronic signatures affixed using DocuSign complied with ESIGN Act, in part, because the parties explained DocuSign's process for verifying signatures. Although the court essentially affirms certain electronic signatures in general, the court did not agree that in this case plaintiff had affixed a valid signature. Therefore the employee did not form a contract a 6 l 01 y 4�- Town of Barnstable *Permit# Expires 6 months front issue date Regulatory Services Fee o,r ,` t Thomas F. Geller,Director Building Division m i, Tom Perry, CBO, Building Commissioner ;1 l? }} e i/ ,S M 200 Main Street,Hyannis,MA 02601 www.town.bamstable.ma.us Office: 508-862-4038 Fax: 508-790-6230 EXPRESS PERNUT APPLICATION - RESMENTLAL ONLY Not Valid without Red X-Press Imprint IQ Property Address _ [residential Value of Work rI D r 060 Minimum fee of$25.00 for work under$6000.00 Owner's Name&Address Contractor's Name )L.1J •J k Y— / J nL r u,4'1 dz r Telephone Number L>U�� '" / Home Improvement Contractor License#(if applicable) Construction Supervisor's License#(if applicable) / eorkman's Compensation Insurance Check one: I am a sole proprietor I am the Homeowner have Worker's Compensation Insurance Insurance Company Name C Worktnnn's Comp.Policy# Copy of Insurance Compliance Certificate must be on file. Permit Request(check box) [12/Re-roof(stripping old shingles) All construction debris will be taken to Re-roof(not stripping. Going over existing layers of roof) [[�/R/e-side Replacement Windows/doors/sliders. U-Value (maximum.44) *Where required: issuance of this permit does not exempt compliance with other town department regulations,i.e.Historic,Conservation,etc.. ***Note: Prop wrier must sign Property Owner Letter of Permission. e Home Imt Contractors License is required. SIGNATURE: Q:Fonns:expmtrg Revise061306 Office of Consumer Affairs and vusiness Regulation 10 Park Plaza - Suite 5170 Boston, Massachusetts 02116 Home Improvement Contractor Registration Registration: 110609 w" Type: Private Corporation `r Expiration: 11/3/2012 Tr# 205399 E J JAXTIMER, BUILDER, INC. _ � , ';J ERNEST JAXTIMER 48 ROSARY LN. � HYANNIS, MA 02601 Y . ==f Update Address and return card.Mark reason for change. ❑ Address Renewal ❑ Employment ❑ Lost Card DPS-CA1 0 50M-04/04-G101216 Office ot�o�m i•''Xfa rsV&'13i>rsines�n License or registration valid for individul use only HOME IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTOR before the expiration date. If found return to: Registration: a110609 Type: Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation ; Expiration: `1t/3%2012 Private Corporation 10 Park Plaza-Suite 5170 Boston,MA 02116 E TIMER, BU119�fZ C=xii ERNEST JAXTIMER' f<� 48 ROSARY LN HYANNIS;MA 02601 Z;; =_ Undersecretary Not valid without signature ya - Massachusetts- Department of Public SatetN Board of Building Regulations and Standards Construction Supervisor License .License: CS 3251 N Restricted-to: 00: s €RNEST_J_JAXTIMER u- 48 ROSARY LANE HYANNIS, MA 02601_ i Expiration: 1/14/2012 C onunissiuner Tr#: 13122 f The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents Office of Investigations 600 Washington Street . } Boston, MA 02111 www.mass.gov/dia. Workers' Compensation Insurance Affidavit: Builders/Contractors/Electricians/Plumbers Applicant Information Please Print Legibly Name (Business/Organization/Individual): r y Address: City/State/Zip: Cc.�1." 5 m1 0260 l Phone m (66159 1711 Q • J_�4 Are you an employer? eck the appropriate box: 1.E3 I am a employer with a� 4. ❑ I am a general contractor and I Type of project(required): employees.(full and/or part-time).* have hired the sub-contractors 6. ❑New construction listed on the attached sheet. 7. ❑ Remodeling 2.❑ I am a sole proprietor or partner- ship and have no employees These sub-contractors have 8. ❑ Demolition working for me in any capacity. employees and have workers' 9. ❑Building addition [No workers'comp. insurance comp.insurance.1 required.] 5. ❑ We are a corporation and its 10.❑ Electrical repairs or additions q ] 3.❑ I am a homeowner doing all work officers have exercised their I❑Plumbing repairs or additions myself. [No workers' comp. right of exemption per MGL 12.❑Roof repairs insurance required.] t c. 152, §1(4),and we have no 13.❑ Other employees. [No workers' comp.insurance required.] *Any applicant that checks box 41 must also fill out the section below showing their workers'compensation policy information. t Homeowners who submit this affidavit indicating they are doing all work and then hire outside contractors must submit a new affidavit indicating such. $Contractors that check this box must attached an.additional sheet showing the name of the sub-contractors and state whether or not those entities have employees. If.the sub-contractors have employees,they must provide their workers'comp.policy number. I am an employer that is providing workers'compensation insurance for my employees. Below is the policy and job site information. Q �.•� � p� Insurance Company.Name: B��c�� P4W,Z1_'?0K( I AI S C.0 . Policy#or Self-ins.Lic.#: �5� �Q 6 Expiration Date: �I Ut pZ Job Site Address: ^3 / ��Gt C� City/State/Zip: \ Attach a copy of the workers' compensation policy declaration page(showing the policy number and expiration date). Failure to secure coverage as required under Section 25A of MGL c. 152 can lead to the imposition of criminal penalties of a fine up to$1,500.00 and/or one-year imprisonment,as well as civil penalties in the form of a STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of up to$250.00 a day against the violator. Be advised that a copy of this statement may be forwarded to the Office of Investigations of the DIA for insurance coverage verification. I do hereby certify under the:pains and penalties of perjury that the information provided above is true and correct Signature: Date: Phone#: Official use only. Do not write in this area, to be completed by city or town official City or Town: Permit/License# Issuing Authority(circle one): 1.Board of Health 2.Building Department 3.City/Town Clerk 4.Electrical Inspector 5.Plumbing Inspector 6. Other Contact Person: Phone#: Aco® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE °A0310712011 THIS'CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER.THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certficate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(iss)must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorseme s). wNTAcT Erica H.O'Connor PRODUCER HART INSURANCE AGENCY,INC. PHONE (508)759-7326 FAX.,.,:(508)759-7366 243 MAIN STREET E-MAIL PO BOX 700 DRE : BUZZARDS BAY,MA 025320700 INSURE S AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIL I INSURER A.. ARBELLA PROTECTION INS CO 41360 INSURED EJ Jaxtimer Builder,Inc INSURER 8: ARBELLA PROTECTION INS CO 41360 48 Rosary Lane mSURER C: ARBELLA PROTECTION INS CO 41360 Hyannis,MA 02601 USURER DARBELLA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY 10017 INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER, REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED.ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. IN SR TR TYPE OF INSURANCE AOOL SUER POLICY NUMBER .MOL.ICY EFF POLICY YY UMITS A GENERALWIBIUTY 8500042039 01/01/2011 01/01/2012 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1000000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LLABILITY PREMISES(Ea RENTEDammami S 300000 CLAIMS-MADE FV OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) E 5006 PERSONAL BADVINJURY $ 1000000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2000NO GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMPIOP AGG $ 2000000 POLICY PRO- LOC f B AUTOMOBILEUABILM 21662400004 01/01/2011 01/01/2012 MMe �lell)SINGLE LIMIT 1000000 ANY AUTO - BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) S AUTOS AUTOS NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ HIRED AUTOS AUTOS r s C UMBRELLA UAB OCCUR 4600042040 OV01/2011 01/01/2012 EACH OCCURRENCE S 2,000,000 LEXCESSU" ri CLAWS-.ADE AGGREGATE i 2,000,01X) i DED I RETENTION 15 1 1 S D WORKERS COMPENSATION 0053890111 01/01/2011 01/01/2012 VvcSTATU- JOT RI- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIEXECUTIVE YIN N 1 A E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 500,00D OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED.9ED(Mandatary M NH) E.L DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE t 500,000 tl yyeeae describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES(Attach ACORD 1101,Additlonai Remarks Schedule,I more&moo Is required► CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION TOWN OF BARNSTABLE SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED-BEFORE 200 MAIN STREET THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN HYANNIS,MA 02601 ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTNORQED REPRESETNTA�.��/ 01988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2010/05) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD To •of Barnstable • =-or zxs�qy Services - Regulatory 9 $ T- , hyo-m'a7s�F,„Geiler,Director Tom Perry, Building Commissioner 200 Main Street, Hyannis,MA 02601 tfice:. 508=862-403 S Fax: 505-7 ProperOWner Must 77 Comgle amd 5ign'I'his Section f UsingA Builder ,as Owner of the subject property hexeby authorize EJ JAY-77 t9C, 8Y l , 1AIC to act on my beh4 in 211 matters relative to work authorized by this Yule permit application for - 23 kvo �( aw , 64 AIAVs po r-1- Address of Job) S e o Owner date Print Name Q:FoRts:o-m-�FERNM SIox P 3 3 9r4qi9 3 01 ® US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for Intemational Mail See reverse Sent t Street&Numb n 70 '� ost Office,State,&ZIP C Postage $02 7 Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee �n Return Receipt Showing to Whom&Date Delivered Q, Return Receipt Showing to Whom, Q Date,&Addressee's Address 0 TOTAL Postage&Fees $a77 ch Postmark or Date 0 U- rn a Stick postage stamps to article to cover First-Class postage,certified mail fee,and charges for any selected optional services(See front). 1. If you want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier(no extra charge). 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the at return address of the article,date,detach,and retain the receipt,and mail the article. LO 3. If you want a return receipt,write the certified mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card,Form 3811,and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space permits. Otherwise,affix to back of article. Endorse front of article a RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number. �. Q 4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the O t addressee,endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. Go 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this E receipt. If return receipt is requested,check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811. ti I 6. Save this receipt and present it if you make an inquiry. a - ra WE + BARNSrABM • ArA�m� The Town of Barnstable Department of Health Safety and Environmental Services Building Division 367 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Office: 508-790-6227 Ralph Crossen Fax: 508-790-6230 Building Commissioner June 13, 1997 Harry Fowler 70 Fresh Pond Parkway Cambridge,MA 02138 RE: M-287/P-136 Dear Property Owner: Our records indicate that your house at,23 Longwood Avenue,Hyannis,MA,is currently being used as a two-family home contrary to Barnstable Zoning Ordinances. You must contact this office as soon as possible to either: 1) apply for a building permit to restore the property to a single family home 2) apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance 3) prove that this is a legal two-family You must contact this office immediately to tell us what direction you wish to take. Sincerely, oria M.Urenas Zoning Enforcement Officer GMU:lb CERTIFIED MAIL-P 339 592 301 19703IIa .-T7Z) T, 7L L ] [R287 136 . LOC] 0023 LONGWOOD AVz UE CTY] 08 TDS] 400 HY KEY] 190821 ----MAILING ADDRESS------- PCA] 1091 PCS] 00 YR] 00 PARENT] 0 FOWLER, HARRY HART TR MAP] AREA159AA JV1423483 MTG10000 23 LONGWOOD 1991 RLTY TR SP1] SP21 SP31 70 FRESH POND PARKWAY UT11 UT21 . 35 SQ FT] 2213 CAMBRIDGE MA 02138 AYB11875 EYB11965 OBS] CONST] 0000 LAND 135800 IMP 118700 OTHER ----LEGAL DESCRIPTION---- TRUE MKT 254500 REA CLASSIFIED #LAND 1 135, 800 ASD LND 135800 ASD IMP 118700 ASD OTH #BLDG (S) -CARD-1 1 88, 400 DESCRIPTION TAX YR CURRENT EXEMPT TAXABLE #BLDG(S) -CARD-2 1 30, 300 TAX EXEMPT #PL 23 LONGWOOD AVE HYPT RESIDENT'L 254500 254500 254500 #RR 0920 0089 OPEN SPACE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL EXEMPTIONS SALE] 05/91 PRICE] 100 ORB] 7517/063 AFD] I A LAST ACTIVITY109/01/92 PCR] Y J A R287 136 . P R A I S A L D A T A• KEY 190821 FOWLER, HARRY HART TR LAND BLD/FEATURES BUILDINGS NUMBER ZN/FL=RF- 1 135, 800 118, 700 2 A-COST 254, 500 B-MKT 184, 400 BY 00/ BY ML 8/95 C-INCOME PCA=1091 PCS=00 SIZE= 2213 JUST-VAL 254, 500 LEV=400 CONST-C 0 ----COMPARISON TO CONTROL AREA 59AA -- --MAY NOT BE COMPARABLE-- NEIGHBORHOOD 59AA HYANNIS PARCEL CONTROL AREA TREND STANDARD 101 10 LAND-TYPE 1358001 LAND-MEAN +0% 2545001 242667 IMPROVED-MEAN -510 250 ] FRONT-FT ] 100 DEPTH/ACRES TABLE 02 100°61 LOCATION-ADJ APPLY-VAL-STAT 1 LNR] LAND LFT/IMP] ADJS/SB/FEAT STR] STRUCTURE ARR] AREA-MEASUREMENTS NOR] NOTES COM] MARKET INC] INCOME PMR] PERMITS GRR] GRAPHIC FUNCTION- [ ] STRUCTURE-CARD NO- [0 0 0] DATA- [ ] XMT [?] i R287 136 . P E R M I T [PMT] ACTIOR] CARD [000] KEY 190821 000000001 PERMIT-NO MO YR TYPE VALUE CK-BY MO YR oCMP NEW/DEMO COMMENT [B37025] [09] [94] [AD] A 160001 [LK] [01] [96] [100] [NEW ] [HP ADD'N ] [B37530] [03] [95] [AD] A 6001 [LK] [01] [96] [100] [NEW ] [HP REPAIR ] r Assessor's Office 0st floor Ma 'V Lot Ax Permit# ✓�75�j� Conservation Office.4th floor 3 -1i 'J Date Issued Z Board of Health Ord floor Engineering Dept. Ord floor House# - k _� Ca Planning Dept. 1st floor/School Admin.Bldg.): �' �� i ,ARNe;rABM i NAM Definitive Plan A roved b Planning Board 19 40 "ate' .n Ct �f c (Applications rocessed 8:30-9:30 a.m. k*11:00-2.00 .m. a � "'A ® TOW O STABLK -0 Building ermit Application' Proiect Street Address � � �C n Village Fire District (hvner c--C Cam, Address Telephone Permit Request: o�z i Zoning District Flood Plain Water Protection Lot Size Grandfathered Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization Recorded Current Use .Iems Proposed Use Construction T_)Z Existing Information Dwelling Type: Single Family Two family ,. • Multi-family Age of structure ? Basement type Historic House Finished Z---' Old King s Highway Unfinished Number of Baths No. of Bedrooms _ Total Room Count(not including baths) First Floor Heat Type and Fuel /ice Grp, r:L G Central Air Fireplaces Garage: Detached Other Detached Structures: Pool Attached Barn None Sheds Other Builder Information Name 4, � i Telephone number 5 G R 3 G �l Address_lla/ �*a�azcC��/� License# Home Improvement Contractor# Worker's Compensation # NEW CONSTRUCTION OR ADDITIONS REQUIRE A SITE PLAN (AS BUILT) SHOWING EXISTING, AS WELL AS PROPOSED STRUCTURES ON THE LOT. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO Proiect Cost Fee SIGNATURE �; LV v'2 DATE BUILDING PERMIT DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S) I BPERM T r� A=287. 136 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY o -3- 3/22/95 23 Longwood Avenue Hyannisport } ADDRESS VILLAGE f OWNER Harry Fowler DATE OF INSPECTION: s p FOUNDATION FRAME s , INSULATION • FIREPLACI ELECTRICAL: ROUGH = FINAL PLUMBING: ROUGH FINAL GAS: "• ROUGH ' FINAL- FINAL BUILDING: DATE CLOSED OUT: - r ASSOCIATE PLAN NO. r t a �sflcr[wsassasacurrood COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY =� � �p$sa�s2cStateBuildirr OF ONE ASHBORTON PLACE" Codoj$catlssrQcrovocatioFF MASSACHUSETTA BOSTON,MA 02108 o'thlaticowsa- 15 CAUTION -- EXPIRATION DATE::: EFFECTIVE DATE LIC-NO. FOR:PROTECTION AGAINST RESTRICTIONS THEFT, PUT RIGHT THUMB PRIN.. . PPROPRIATE BG::;A LICENSE. BLASTING OPERATORS MUST INCLUDE PHOTO. I P . ,.... ,. .. PHOTO(BLASTING OPR ONLY) FEE; NOT VALID UNTIL SIGNED BY LICENSEE AND OFFICIALLY - HEIGHT: STAMPED-OR-SIGNATURE OF THE COMMISSIONER '1 DOB: f = JUL 0 71"3 Air s. " S FULL ATHISDOCUMENTMUST Bl- GNATURE CAR I F SEERIEDONTHEPERSONOF THE HOLDER WHENEN OTHERS-RIGHT THUMB PRIM GAGED INTHISOCCUPATION ION �.~�l�?A �-a ✓�TpOfN9llMtll�BQuti O�✓KO06� ��' Y: r� HOME IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTOR Registration 104499� Type -, PRIVATE CORPORATION Ezplraflov t 07/14/96 a �aw ,�� Art Dolg ff`�BuildingJReeodelr L Dolgoff s g .Arthur A f°'f t;rCoTmlCk DT _ ADMINISTRATOR i J1 z , 11. p_ 1;.0. Z�617:2„122 DEPT IM) .9CCID *<` 1�Oe• �•�— — l�0l;7-1)ionl<-FL ii/1 o f i /aa�acll. t b �13Partnw d o��ncrlu�trial�eeic�enf� 600 !/Vasknyfon., 1.1 James J.Campbell Dolton, 1/(am= 02f f f COmmiS3�Oner Workers' Compensation Insurance Affidavit I, (aoaesccdQamiuee) with a principal place of business at: t�ris�z�a� do hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury, that: O I am an employer providing workers' compensation coverage for my employees working on this job. insurance Company Policy Humber () I am a sole proprietor and have no one working for me in any capacity. () I am a sole proprietor, general contractor or homeowner (circle one) and have hired the contractors listed below who have the following workers' compensation policies: Contractor Insurance CompanylPolicy Ndrnber Contractor Insurance Company/Policy Number Contractor Insurance Company/Policy Number {1 I am a homeowner perfcrmirig ail the work myself. C:.,a•C J-- =,of&x DIA for cc\Tr26e verifiu ion and thz:``iiure tC f-,c < CG'::'4t Lf fEC:::EC Cr:ctr -%-f.c 1-�GL :�2 C::,-,luc to o*c impc;iiion Gi cnirnxiz!pouf;es con5iSua£of e fire of up to<_l,<<,�.G:!Znc,Cr C" i=-rLC:7-77En: . weir �s Cr::� �Efa�;iE:'„ ..e fcr-.Cf a STOP WORT{ ORDER ant,a finee c(s ieo.00 a ezy zpirL1 f'1C_ Signed t_his day of �102��1� 19 LicenseelPermittee Building Department Licensing Board Selectmens Of-ice Health Department TO VERIFY COVERAGE If` M MATION CALL: 617-727-4900 X403, 404, 405, 409, 375 TO ' OF 3ER. -AB--.E BUILDING PERMIT 7_S'�,> O The B,a, ,�,z Town of Barnstable Depar-iment of Health Safety, and Environmental Services 3439 N fin ~` liuil<lin I)ivi-Siort 367 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Offi=. 508 790-6227 Fam• :508-775 3344 mph Scommissioner For offoe use only Pcrmit no. Date : AFFIDAVIT _ . . <, HOME IMPROVEMFNT O0Wn ACr0RMW SUPFLEMM� T ' IC11TI0)~I MGLG Id2A mquitrsthatdjC ruction.2It builds a�t10II f,0 aay OWnCr. building coniarnrng at.kart One but not more than four d 10 such credence or bm�I �doh """"ti6 IInrtS Ot,ZO ftlilL�IItS �8 by z�stuzd contramrs,with certain cw;w ns�along vith aver acqtiucmcw& Type of Wor3c-ez:2 � Esc.Cost- Co&O •` Addn=cfWork ,--1, v 0%mu Name: Datc of Permit Application: -Iharb3cer fythat o....:.--., :ri•.:i:�::,::...:"-.._ canon s - i Work c,-duded by Law Job undo 5I.000 Buiiding no4cana-0ccrp1cd ; ORrcr pulling cam permit Notice is hereby givcn that: OWI'T S PULLING THEIR OWN PERNUT OR DEALING WITH Ut,'REGISIERED CONTRACTORS FOR APPLICABLE HOI,E IMPROVE MITT WORK DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE ARBITRATION PROGRAM;OR GUARAI17Y FUND UNDER MGL c. 142A NO. --- • O{7 - Datc O.;-ncr's n:�c Town of Barnstable Building Department Complaint/Inquiry Report Date: Rec'd by: Assessors .'` Name: Complaint - Location Address: M/P Originator Name: street: vim; state• Zip: Telephone: D/E , Complaint Description: ' Inquiry Description: l For OI ce Use Only Inspector's Action/Comments Date: 7 `�7 �—�G Inspector.�Yrl zc7 Follow-up Action Adclidonal Info. Attaclied QUERY -PERMITS: QUERY END QUERY PERMITS PENTAMATION------------------------------------------------------ ---- 07/23/96 PERMIT NUMBER 229 PARCEL ID 287 136 23 LONGWOOD AVENUE PERMIT TYPE BREMOD RESIDENTIAL ALT/CONV DESCRIPTION 37530 TERMITE REPAIR ON SILLS CONTRACTOR PERMIT FEE 0 . 00 VARIANCE STATUS C COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION TYPE 434 GROUP TYPE APPLICATION EXPIRATION VALUATION 600 . 00 DATE ISSUED 03/22/1995 COMPLETED 10/03/1995 DEPARTMENT-----STATUS---DATE-----DEPARTMENT-----STATUS---DATE---- (N) EXT/ (P) REVIOUS/ (C) ONTRACTORS/ PR(0) PERTY/ (I)NSPECTIONS/ (H) ISTORY/ (F) EES/ (A) RCHITECTS/ (V) IOLATION/ (E) XIT QUERY PERMITS: QUERY END QUERY PERMITS PENTAMATION----------------------------------------------------------- 07/23/96 PERMIT NUMBER 230 PARCEL ID 287 136 23 LONGWOOD AVENUE PERMIT TYPE BADDI BUILDING PERMIT ADDITION DESCRIPTION 37025 ADDITION TO GARAGE (20 ' X 201 ) CONTRACTOR PERMIT FEE 0 . 00 VARIANCE STATUS C COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION TYPE 438 GROUP TYPE APPLICATION EXPIRATION VALUATION 16000 . 00 DATE ISSUED 09/13/1994 COMPLETED 10/03/1995 DEPARTMENT-----STATUS---DATE-----DEPARTMENT-----STATUS---DATE---- (N) EXT/ (P) REVIOUS/ (C) ONTRACTORS/ PR (0) PERTY/ (I)NSPECTIONS/ (H) ISTORY/ (F) EES/ (A) RCHITECTS/ (V) IOLATION/ (E)XIT R287 136. P E R M I T PMT ACTION R CARD 000 KEY 190821 00000000 PERMIT-NO MO YR. TYPE VALUE CK-BY MO YR %CMP NEW/DEMO COMMENT B37025 09 94 AD - 16000 LK 01 96 100 NEW HP ADD'N B37530 03 95 AD - 600 LK O1 96 100 NEW HP REPAIR RCV F Window APR/1 at BARNSTABLE (CY) 1p QUERY PROPERTY: QUERY END QUERY PROPERTY PENTAMATION----------------------------------------------------------- 07/23/96 PARCEL ID 287 136 GEO ID 19082 LOT/BLOCK DBA PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER FOWLER 23 LONGWOOD AVENUE HARRY HART TR 23 LONGWOOD 1991 RLTY TR Hyannisport 70 FRESH POND PARKWAY CAMBRIDGE MA 02138 PHONE DISTRICT HY DEVELOPMENT STATUS C ASSESSOR' S CODE CAPACITY(NOTES) ZONING DIST/ZOC RF-1 SEWER SYSTEM FLOOD PLN/ELEV. WATER SYSTEM OKH? # BEDROOMS ZBA DECISION FAMILY APT LOT SIZE 15246 OPER/MGR NAME WET LANDS MULT ADDRESS USE 101 (N) EXT / (P) REVIOUS / NO (T) ES / PER(M) ITS / (V) IOLATIONS / (G) EOBASE / (E) XIT This value is not among the valid possibilities w R287136. APPRAISAL DATA KEY 190821 FOWLER,HARRY HART TR LAND BLD/FEATURES BUILDINGS NUMBER ZN/FL=RF- 1 135,800 118,700 2 A-COST 254,500 B-MKT 184,400 BY 00/ BY ML 8/95 C-INCOME PCA=1091 PCS=00 SIZE= 2213 JUST-VAL 254,500 LEV=400 CONST-C 0 ----COMPARISON TO CONTROL AREA 59AA----MAY NOT BE COMPARABLE-- NEIGHBORHOOD 59AA HYANNIS PARCEL CONTROL AREA TREND STANDARD 10 10 LAND-TYPE 135800 LAND-MEAN +0% 254500 242667 IMPROVED-MEAN -51% 25% FRONT-FT 100 DEPTH/ACRES TABLE 02 100% LOCATION-ADJ APPLY-VAL-STAT 1 LNR LAND LFT/IMP ADJS/SB/FEAT STR STRUCTURE ARR AREA-MEASUREMENTS NOR NOTES COM MARKET INC INCOME PMR PERMITS GRR GRAPHIC FUNCTION- STRUCTURE-CARD NO-000 DATA- XMT? RCV F Window APR/1 at BARNSTABLE (CY) 1p 11.'02 Py 17: 02 'Z6177277122 DEPT IND ACCID Z001 r-�`—L �Oli1,l>i012(t%F'LZt.(.,1. O eUapartmenL a��nc�ustrio�'✓ticcic�enf3 600 !/Valniton Shy t James J-' :a:npbell &ton, 1//addagu.s 02f f f Commissioner Workers' Compensation Insurance Affidavit i, with a principal place of business at: (c:yistatpizip) do hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury, that: O I am an employer providing workers'compensation coverage for my employees working on this job. �jep0 oy' z Insurance Company Policy Number () I am a sole proprietor and have no one working for me in any capacity. 0 1 am a sole proprietor, general contractor or homeowner (circle one) and have hired the contractors listed below who have the following workers' compensation policies: Contractor Insurance Company/Policy Number Contractor Insurance Company/Policy Number Contractor Insurance Company/Policy dumber {) I am a homeov,-ner performing aiI the work myself. cc ,-c`d:;<_ x-;l::e fc^r:crC:Ed cc..a Office of of d•,e DlA for eoxTr2ge verification and that fyi'.ure tc sF-c::rf cc:��geZI rec ::Ed t:neer Seen 2-`A of 1-1GL 152 can luc to Lhc imr-csinon ct ctminal pmzWes consisrne of a fine of up to<_1,Sf .GO ar.Gler cr:- yEars ri`cr^En;; we if as c�.,d peraities in tt.e ferm cf a STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of S 100.00 a day against me_ v Signed this day of 14 � Licensee/Permittee Building Department Licensing Board Selectmens Office Health Department TO VERIFY COVEPAGE INFORMATI01,1 CALL: 617-727-4400 X403, 404, 4aS, 409, 375 TOW.i OF 3ARN--TSB?_E BUILDING PERMIT 0 Map.-- '7 '-Parcel 13 Permit# �. oo . - Date Issued Board of Health(3rd floor)(8:15 -9:30/ 1:00-4:45) ,lS�- Fee= ® ' oo 41;w o Engineering Dept. (3rd floor) House# SEPTIC SYST E STALLED IN CE 19 WITH a ENVIRONMENTAL E AND TOWN OF BARNSTABL-MWN REGULATIOINS Building Permit Application Ttree"t.AddressO-rr�-L��LL� l�(✓t��C' Village l Owner Address Telephone Permit Request C' First Floor square feet o I Y VOL Second Floor square feet —Aestimated Project Cost $ V yd G Zoning District Flood Plain Water Protection Lot Size Grandfathered ? Zoning Board of Appeals Authorization Recorded Current Use Proposed Use Construction Type Commercial Residential Dwelling Type: Single Family Two Family Multi-Family Age of Existing Structure Basement Type: Finished Historic House Unfinished Old King's Highway Number of Baths No.of Bedrooms Total Room Count(not including baths) First Floor Heat Type and Fuel Central Air Fireplaces Garage: Detached Other Detached Structures: Pool Attached Barn None Sheds Other Builder Information Name l�t�CA C, Telephone Number 5-6 Address -_L - License# / q 1y O o7 G Home Improvement Contractor# �6 ,7" q Worker's Compensation# NEW CONSTRUCTION OR ADDITIONS REQUIRE A SITE PLAN(AS BUILT)SHOWING EXISTING,AS WELL AS PROPOSED STRUCTURES ON THE LOT. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS RESULTING FROM THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN TO SIGNATURE - DATE 3 9'6- BUILDING PERMIT DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S) t 1~ R OFFICIAL USE ONLY t P -RMIT NO. ` D is M. P/.PARCEL NO. ADDRESS VILLAGE OWNER a DATE OF INSPECTION: FOONDAION FRAME ; INSULATION - FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL: ROUGH FINAL PLUMBING: ROUGH(::, FINAL _ GAS: ROUciu FINAL _ r t } FINAL BUILDING e y- cr ! ! DATE CLOSED OUT Q tF: ASSOCIATION PLAN NO. t ! r � S The Town' of Barnstable De partment of Iiealt}, Safety and Environmental Scr�,ice se3a `eel } s 367 Main Srrert,Hyannis MA 02601 Offiae: 508 790-6227 - Fs�C. �;508-?75 3344CMSSCU For office use only - �issioner' Fcanit no. Date _ AFMAVILT HOME WROVEMENT Q0 . H1KAG'T0RIAW SUPPIENERrIo PERMII'APPIICATION' MQ.c 142A requizes dig fbe'k=vstrueti iiw4KVVcMctt. ieMaaL dcmobtiatq or eon buildingbuilding8 2(bast one but thot more than four d �9 P c v�ner to such residence or build ug �' creel contractors,with ca�fa'ra ke - S �{V,( r,>, Type of work Est..cost 61 C . Address of work .�• 3 L� ��,�.�,��i�� Ov6mu Namc: Date of Permit Application 2 g I haeby certify that: Work c,-dudcd by law Job undo S I.000 Building no4oa-ua-o=rpicd; OArcr pulling own P=ait Notice is hereby given that: OIVN RS PULLING THEIR OIAT'PERN.IT OR DEALING vTM LTNTREGISTPRED CONTRACTORS FOR APPLICABLE HOW IWROVEIMENT WORK DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE ARBITRATION PROGRAT;OR GUARA_trry FuNTD UNDER MGL c. 142A '. �,CfC:' 'C'��•'iGC: r.-,..H: ".. ...: f<L(r�i�.0 Cv.:C:. /° i �9 r.c�ar��ca J�o. OR D2ic Ou-ncr's m-mc __.•0= =; 17: 02 �61 7°7 fl--'= DEPT IND 4CCID f' ,.� ='. I�OJi2I)iU11ct•rQflil v i��a��czc�.cc�ets aUuPartnwnl o1J.,Ltrca1-,4cciLd4 600 James J.Campbell [3osfon, V a d d l, 02 f f Commissioner Workers' Compensation Insurance Affidavit eaoeascrl�amiaee) with a principal place of business at: (cayistawsfp) . do hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury, that: () I am an employer providing workers' compensation coverage for my employees working on this Job. Insurance Company Policy Humber () I am a sole proprietor and have no one working for me in any capacity. () I am a sole proprietor, general contractor or homeowner (circle one) and have hired the contractors fisted below who have the following workers' compensation(policies: Contractor Insurance Company/Policy NuIrnber Contractor Insurance Company/Policy Number Contractor Insurance Company/Policy Number (1 I am a horneov.-ner performing ;II the work myself. CC <.` ...,- _ E. W.:.:E C.aCe C: of&..e DIA for CC\•PrzZ4e VErifczior,2nd Lh2:f:iture tC :t': CC c Ec rEC_.:EC l:^CE! A.G C:i ic!c.o *C 1^pC i(iG(7 Ci C f^:12:¢Cf2t ie5 CO(iStS�E of a fine of up to<_i,t��.G.' rC:Cr Cr ir-�rec'C.f kF?' c :ii ter zi;if:i„tnt fcrn cf 2 STOP WORK ORDER ;ne a fine of 5100.Cr a 4�;2pimt r.,e. Signed &.is ,;L , clay of �1�� ,l 19 Licensee/Permittee Building Department Licensing Board Selectmens Office Health Department TO VERIFY COVED-.GE 1NMRMAT10111 CALL: 617-727-4900 X403, 404, 405, 409, 375 TO'.^-. OF E° _sB .E BUILDING PERMIT 0 ;F r r a � A+ Zo .,. 10 � _Ay 9 i Av (zo 1 F - .. `O ON \ � \ PICA 1 a� 49113 � f 7¢� / 5r rL00 Sff�/� 3� � - u< Assessor's map and lot number �.. -PT SYSTEM iMUST BE INSTALLED IN _ WITH. Af?TICLE r COMPLIANCE Sewage Permit number ..............G'aLl. . GtC ...... .I STATE SARfITARY'CODE AND �Qy�FTHEtO^� w. T 0 W OF BARN WN S r1 FAG�ffl?E_ To w �yA E,r >, Z BABBSTADL$ i tv ! "AB` i639 11 MAY OUILDINU j INSPECTOR O • a ;u Gr. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO .............. ...... ....... ....................................... TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ....GC ?Z,�?... ...............19a TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned hereby ap� for a permit according to the following info on: Location .......... ..... �...... :... .. .......................................... �. . . Proposed Us` ....... .. ... .......................................................... ............ .......................................... Zoning District .................................Fire District ....................................:............................ . Name of Owner .. ........ .... �... ........ ...... .......................Addres ....................z�"41,-� ..:. .......... j.............. . DI Name of Builder C .......:.. .... .................... .....:..........Address✓�� /c �— �...�.. ....... ......... ...... Name of Architect .......... Address ......................................,............................................. .... ......... Numberof Rooms .............. .............:................................Foundation ......G .r..?�........../........................................... 4 4 Exterior ..... ..... .. :. .. . .............................Roofing ................................. .. ................. ..... -mac ....... n Floors Interior .............. . 2...... .................................. Heating /'J .....:..............................:..........Plumbing ........... ..... Fireplace .... ... ........................................Approximate Cost� -.d®l,:`...®. ........ ..... .... Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board -----------_-------------------19________. Area �:1 . ......................... Diagram of Lot and Building with Dimensions Fee ..............t.. .. .. .............. SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF BOARD OF HEALTH I hereby agree to conform to all the Rules and Regulations of the Town of Barnstable regarding the above construction. Name . f .I...r•...........�. * John ( 00175 ' add to garage ' ' No ................. Permit for .................................... ......................... ' -^-'-'---- Ave Locoton°..�-��.--..�---------. . - ��=��r° ^--'-'--- .^^- '--^-^-'-----'' ��1�� Owner ��^= -'-----' --------~-'^- Type of Cony�u��on -.-.��-------. � rA --.-.-.---.---..------,-----.. Ftot -----.---- Lot -----..�----. ' ' /~f�,/V 78 Granted ---- r-'-r- Pern�/ � � �� | `r'` /Do� of | �[ Q inspection ^---r-'----' \ ' v � 7� ' ` �Date Comp/otad '--..��------. ^� ~ ^ � � PERMIT REFUSED ............................................................. ^--'---'-`~-----'-----~^^'-�---'' �r ---.-........-..-..--.-.----. ...- .,....'. . ..J-..., �' ..-.--.---.-.----. -. .... -.. `--~.....-,..-......,-...--,,..---.. ................................................ lA . ,,_-- . � -------.-...--..--.-.----.....--- ` _---- ..................................................... ° i Assessor's map and lot number .. ? "� C /i,rJ .,.,. ....... Sewage Permit number ................_._......:'......"-!:.:�....,.,,� 1 e�Qyoft"ET°�♦� ,f TOWN OF BAR.NSTABLE 1 B9BHSTABLE, i 9. BUILDING INSPECTOR V , l ,APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ............................................................................................................................. i t TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ....::<_.. .,-.:' ..�-t'.-�.r.�.:....: ................ ......................................... ...........��........... ...............19 r+ TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: " The undersigned hereby applies for a permit according to the following information: Location ............... r.'.? .... ............................ .. c. rr a --1',,,;,,,,,,,,,............ r ProposedUse ......... ;-:�--C� .....:......................................................................................................................... ZoningDistrict ...... f.............................................................Fire District ..................................................:........................... �✓ 'J Name of Owner ...........:.........:.................................................Address ...4..........................................:. V 47� Name of Builder 6-. ...r..la...�' .........Address �......: ...........................:........................II.......... Nameof Architect ...........:..,...................................................Address ......................................,.........`.................................. Numberof Rooms ..............�`....................-: :........................Foundation .............................................................................. .............................Roofing .................................. �f .................Exterior Floors ......... ! -s-r�'�.E•�-ram ,' ..... r.. .......,.:........................................................Interior .:.............,.._.:r..:.....'..:..._....-!.._ ................................... Jf Heating ..........,:�,�--z.r.-�:...............:...................................Plumbing .........,�/a�'1--�.,.................................................. Fireplace Approximate Cost -- 44'D i Q G ......................... .................................................................... Definitive Plan Approved by Planning Board ________________________________19________. Area .......//.1�.:1l�................ Diagram of Lot and Building with Dimensions Fee I-J. A-4 SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF BOARD OF HEALTH W L I hereby agree to conform to all the Rules and Regulations of the Town of Barnstable regarding the above construction. �r Name .. ...... .........` ..- /i....... � ` 20175 add - ..0 Permit for - ��l Ave. Location �f��......�.-----'~--. --' � Byazmuiaporc \ / ---,_--__,_._,_.^.-----..\ .............. - John Reyburn Ovvner - . .......................................... frame Type of / , rrat Ma\y4 78 ^ ' ' Permit— Granted— ------` � 19 Date of "'"p�`= \ � . , ^ Date Completed t...................A.............19 � . PERMIT / � . .. � � � --. ��.�� X - . ( �� y- � ' ^'--^^-^~^`~^'X[^'—^'^ ^')r'�.7� ., --^^` ^ ^^^^'-~~---'--'----r^-^^''-^'~--^' � ` -----~--^~^^^^^^-^^'----'^~'^-`^^' � Approved ---------------- 19 ; -------------~..~-.-..~~-..-.-.. ` -------'----^-----'-^-'~^^^^^^'' � � CA ,6•-D• „'-D' NOTES: - 1.) CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS &DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD I 2.) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL INTERIOR&EXTERIOR MATERIALS,. DETAILS,&FINISHES IN THE FIELD WITH OWNER 3.) ROUGH OPENING HEAD HEIGHT OF WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR TO BE 6'-B"ABOVESUBFLOOR 4.) ALL CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM TO 780 CMR MASSACHUSET_TS _ s STATE BUILDING CODE,BTH EDITION AMENDEMENT&IRC2015 4 5.) 110 MPH EXPOSURE B WIND ZONE EXIST. EXIST. 6.) ALL SHEETS OF PLYWOOD WALL SHEATHING TO BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY, 5 „• PATIO' SUNROOM OR HORIZONTALLY W/BLOCKING',AT EDGES,3"EDGE/12"FIELD NAILING 4 - - - 7.) ALL LVL LUMBER/BEAMS TO BE 1.9e U360 LOAD 8.) FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE IECC2015 RESIDENTIAL ENERGY -. EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS&VERIFY ALL DETAILS WITH THE INSULATION • INSTALLER/CONTRACTOR. ) 9.) FOLLOW ALL MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF EXIST. ALL SIMPSON COMPONENTS OFFICE 10.)ALL CONCRETE USED FOR FOUNDATION WALLS,FOOTINGS 8 SLABS TO BE 3000 PSI EAsr. EAST 11.)VERIFY ALL PLUMBING&ELECTRICAL DETAILS Wl OWNERS ON THE SITE r 1- DURING FRAMING CONSTRUCTION BXI9TING DOORS TO BE REMOVED 12.)TIMBER FRAMING TO BE SPRUCEIPINE/FIR NO.2 GRADE O ` S � EXIST. 0. IECC2015 RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY DETAILS BEDROOM#2 uP -- u CLIMATE ZONE 5(USE EITHER PRESCRIPTIVE VALUES OR RESCHECK CALCULATION EXIST. TABLE 402.1.2(MINIMUM PRESCRIPTIVE INSULATION&FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS) 9 BEDROOM# - A2'&"x68°I NEW w PLATFOR qp MP99 asttoa avuue vonrt , n aHFrSOEErIe EXIST. D x,MNON ,��HT ELN� �ooFRNE4 6 w tc)s LIVING srAO NOTES 1 R VALUES ARE MINIMUMS&U FACTORSARE M MUMS. —— © WID ? 2.1-9 MEANS R=I5 CONTINUOUS INSULATED SHEATHING ON THE INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR P - ' OF THE HOME OR R-19 INSULATION CAVITY AT THE INTERIOR OF THE BASEMENT WALL 5 MEANS 3.REFER TO IECC 2015 CHAPTER 4 FOR ALL INSULATION&ENERGY REQUIREMENTS:— II 4.13♦ NS IRS CONTINUOUS INSULATED SHEATHING ON THE WALL EXTERIOR / II L_ &R13 CAVITY INSULATION NE 18 CL� L Cflo��^ ° T BATH �� LIN _ROOF BELOW - -EXIST. 1 r / CA,• _.t C,� i L QoN.KITCHEN 0 w �/ 2, _ © EXISTF s II HALL II REF EXIST. SMOKE DE�E�TORS REVIEWED _ 2D"DEEP gBATH WARDROBE u) F"""" SHOWRR CABINET S BATH#1 DINING EXPANDED VERIFY ALL DETAILS IN BEDROOM#3 THE FIELD V BA , ST/, '- UIL ING DEPT. DA I E ---------------------- G1 STEP DOWN ANDERSEN TW2436 J IS ILED DA.VM. G -- ANDERSEN FIR DEPARZME ,o 0 16 5H MIDEftSEN Oo EXIST. TILED FLOG TW2436 = COVERED so SIGNATURES AFr REQUIRED FOR PIRMITTINQ N W436 EAST. FOR WETR � b 3 BATH PORCH REMOD.-I 3 A3 4 3 O BATH A3 ' L 1 R J EXIST. M.T. EAST. F 24•-o• ,o-o• FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN LEGEND: EXISTING WALLS r A CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED Ll- NOTE``— ® NEW CONSTRUCTION I EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR (4) BEDROOMS (Z)SMOKE DETECTOR THE EXISTING GUEST COTTAGE HAS (1) BEDROOM AND THE QC CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR HOUSE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS (3) BEDROOMS THE COTTAGE BATH IS TIED INTO THE EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM &VERIFIED ON 2/28/2018 PER REQUEST OF THE LOCAL HEALTH d DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR.A SKETCH IS PROVIDED WITH THE PLAN PACKAGE TH ®I \ ® COTUIT BAY DESIGN, LL C NEW ADDITION/REMODELING FOR. / CONSTRUCT ON.THLUILDINCDNTRA L BE NOTIFIED IF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS ARE FOUN DON SCALE DRAWING NO.: 43 BREWSTER ROAD T THESEDRESPONSIBLNGS FOR THE CONTRT ENT 1/411= 1'-01L CONSTRUCTION.THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT ION MASHPEE,MA. 02649 • I C TMENCEH ESE AWITHOUT NONSTRUGTHE PH.(508)274-1166 FAIR RESIDENCE P' COMMENCES NGSARESOL OR E YIFORTH A 1 FAX(508)539-9402 DESIGN OWNER NOTED.ANY OTHE SSS O THESE DRAWINGS ARE SOLELY FOR THE USE DATE 23 LONGWOOD AVENUE HYANNISPORT, MA N OF THTECTURNOTED.IGHT PROTECTION THESE DRAWINGS REQUIRES THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE DESIGNER UNDER THE 8/16/2018 ARCHITECTURAL COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT OF 1990. �e t ,B•.D• „•-0• >•-0• NOTES: ts•-B• n•-B• r-0• 1.)CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS _ &DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD , 2.) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL INTERIOR&EXTERIOR MATERIALS, DETAILS,&FINISHES IN THE FIELD WITH OWNER 3.) ROUGH OPENING HEAD HEIGHT OF WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR TO BE 6'-B"ABOVE SUBFLOOR 4.) ALL CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM TO 780 CMR MASSACHUSETTS § STATE BUILDING CODE.8TH EDITION AMENDEMENT&IRC2015 4 rr 5.) 110 MPH EXPOSURE B WIND ZONE EXIST. EXIST. 6.) ALL SHEETS OF PLYWOOD WALL SHEATHING TO BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY, �! PATIO SUNROOM OR HORIZONTALLY W/BLOCKING AT EDGES,3"EDGE/12"FIELD NAILING v 7.) ALL LVL LUMBER/BEAMS TO BE 1.9e U360 LOAD 8•) FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE IECC2015 RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS&VERIFY ALL DETAILS WITH THE INSULATION I N STALLERICONTRACTO R. 9.) FOLLOW ALL MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF EXIST. ALL SIMPSON COMPONENTS , OFFICE 10.)ALL CONCRETE USED FOR FOUNDATION WALLS,FOOTINGS&SLABS TO BE 3000 PSI Exlsr. EXIST a A i 11•)VERIFY ALL PLUMBING&ELECTRICAL DETAILS W/OWNERS ON THE SITE r I I DURING FRAMING CONSTRUCTION EXISTING DOORS TO 12. TIMBER FRAMING TO BE SPRUCE/PI NE/FIR NO.2 GRADE BE REMOVED ) O EXIST. F -- IECC2015 RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY DETAILS BEDROOM#2 ,\ I CLIMATE ZONE 5(USE EITHER PRESCRIPTIVE VALUES OR RESCHECK CALCULATION EXIST. TABLE 002.1.2(MINIMUM PRESCRIPTIVE INSULATION&FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS) 1 PLATFOR o a^�% n Se °a s i EsE�vI 3'A' BEDROOM# O w= Pyi EXIST. NOTESMEn°, LIVING Wt�C 1.R-VALUES ARE MINIMUMS&U-FACTORS ARE MAXWUMS, o —— © 2.15119 MEANS R=15 CONTINUOUS INSULATED SHEATHING ON THE INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR P —_ OF THE HOME OR R=19 INSULATION CAVITYATTHE INTERIOR OF THE BASEMENT WALL 3.REFER TO IECC 2015 CHAPTER 4 FOR ALL INSULATION&ENERGY REQUIREMENTS 4.13.5 MEANS IRS CONTINUOUS INSULATED SHEATHING ON THE WALL EXTERIOR L &R13 CAVRY INSULATION ` 1IIII 4 CL� l ry BNEW ATH EXIST. �-- LIN `ROOF BELOW L � __- __--_ 1 II �'� 1� © DN. KITCHEN Ell M M - EXIST. zc 19oR c HALL I II REF I \\1, 0 eed 2'0'DEEP --EXIST. EXIST. — WARDROBE <� F=�� :oN---oD'oR EXPANDED BUILT-IN Bf #1 CABINETS DINING ER BEDROOM#3 --�IELD ---------------STEP DOWN 1 ANDERSEN I ,I II I I -- ILED S—R. ANDERSEN f-DERSEN o - Q ANDER TILED FLOO e TW20]B EXIST. b i EXIST. FORWE R W 4 COVERED " ° BATH STUB II PORCH c REMOD.LI - A3 A3 4 BATH A3 ` A3 O I II I b EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. 24•-0• 10'-0• 24'-0• 10'-0' FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN LEGEND: EXISTING WALLS -7 CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED NOTE: ® NEW CONSTRUCTION EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR(4) BEDROOMS C/ Qs SMOKE DETECTOR THE EXISTING GUEST COTTAGE HAS (1)BEDROOM AND THE ©CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR HOUSE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS (3) BEDROOMS z� THE COTTAGE BATH IS TIED INTO THE EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM r� &VERIFIED ON 2/28/2018 PER REQUEST OF THE LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR.A SKETCH IS PROVIDED WITH THE PLAN PACKAGE R { 1 } ERRORSIORO S AUL OMISSIONS RE FOED IF ANY ®� COTUIT BAY DESIGN, LLC NEW ADDITION/REMODELING FOR. Barnstable Bldg. Dept. THESE OON SCALE : DRAWING NO. T THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO START OF 43 BREWSTER ROAD CONSTRUCTION.THE BUILDING CONTRACTOR 1/4" = 1'-0" WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT /� IN THESE DRAWINGS IF CONSTRUCTION MASHPEE,M-1 02649 %` COMMENCES MY OYING THE Al)274-1166 FAIR RESIDENCE ,//w``-` FAX(508)539-9402 Approved by. OF THE OWNER NOTED.AS OTHER USEO THESE DRAWINGS ARE SOLELY FOR THE USE 23 LONGWOOD AVENUE HYANNISPORT MA ARTHEQWNERNDTEYRIGHTPOTECTIN DATE : THESE DRAWINGS REQUIRES THE WRITTEN 8/16/2018 CONSENT OF THE DESIGNER UNDER THE 1 //v� (/ s/ CONSENT99OFTH COPYRIGHT PROTECTION i� f. 1 I: 12 EXIST. 12 MATCH NEW PVCR EBOARDS EXIST. TO MATCH EXISTING EMEMDEff ® ® OE TOMTCCORNERBOARDS TO MATCH EXISTING vFi NEW W.C.SHINGLE SIDING `L Q TO MATCH EXISTING E -- Ck h 12 EXIST. =1 Ell UNA ® r ® C F SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION NEW ASPAHLT ROOF SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING 12 12 EX ST. EXIST. NEW PVC FASCIA,FRIEZE, 8 SOFT ITBOARDS II MATCH EXISTING 12 p EXIST. ❑ - r7F Y R WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION rl THE DESIGNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IF ANY ERRORS OR®� COTUIT BAY DESIGN, LLC NEW ADDITION/REMODELING FOR• CONSTRCTION.SIONSMEFOUNDON SCALE : DRAWING NO.: 43 BREWSTER ROAD WILL BE RESPONSBLE FO TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.THE BUILDING OING CONTRACTOR IN THESE RESPONSIBLE I FOR THE ION 1/411 - 1'-0" IN THESE CRAW WITHOUT IF CONSTRUCTION MASHPEE,MA. 02649 COMMENCES MY OYING THE w PH.(508 274-1166 FAIR RESIDENCE DESIGNER WI ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. L- THESEDRAWINGS ARE SOLELY FOR THE USE FAX(50 )539-9402 OF THE OWNER NOT ED.ANY OTHER USE OF DATE : 23 LONGWOOD AVENUE HYANNISPORT MA THESE DRAWINGSREQUIRES GHT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE DESIGNER UNDER THE Ag/16/2018 7 ACT FE990.�L COPYRIGHT PROTECTION NAILING SCHEDULE 110 MPH EXPOSURE B WIND ZONE JOINT DESCRIPTION NO.OF COMMON NAILS NO.OF BOX NAILS NAIL SPACING C ROOF FRAMING: BLOCKING TO RAFTER(TOE NAILED) 2-8d 2-10d EACH END RIM BOARD TO RAFTER(END NAILED) 2-16 d 3-16d EACH END WALL FRAMING: TOP PLATES AT INTERSECTIONS(FACE NAILED) 4-16d 5-16d AT JOINTS STUD TO STUD(FACE NAILED) 2-16 d 2-16d 24"D.C. HEADER TO HEADER(FACE NAILED) 16d 16d 16"D.C.ALONG EDGES 4 FLOOR FRAMING: JOIST TO SILL,TOP PLATE OR GIRDER(TOE NAILED) 4-8d 4-1 Od PER JOIST BLOCKING TO JOISTS(TOE NAILED) 2-8d 2-1 Od EACH ENO BLOCKING TO SILL OR TOP PLATE(TOE NAILED) 3-16d 4-16d EACH BLOCK LEDGER STRIP TO BEAM OR GIRDER(FACE NAILED) 3-16d 4-16d EACH JOIST JOIST ON LEDGER TO BEAM(TOE NAILED) 3-8d 3-10d PER JOIST BAND JOIST TO JOIST(END NAILED) 3-16d 4-16d PER JOIST BAND JOIST TO SILL OR TOP PLATE(TOE NAILEDO 2-16 d 3-16d PER FOOT ROOF SHEATHING: WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS(PLYWOOD) I RAFTERS OR TRUSSES SPACED UP TO 16"O.C. 8d 10d 6"EDGE/6"FIELD RAFTERS OR TRUSSES SPACED OVER 1 G"D.C. 8d 10d 4"EDGE/4"FIELD GABLE END WALL RAKE OR RAKE TRUSS W/O OVERHANG 8d 10d 6"EDGE/6"FIELD GABLE END WALL RAKE OR RAKE TRUSS 8d 10d 6"EDGE/6"FIELD I'r W/STRUCTURAL OUTLOOKERS GABLE END WALL RAKE OR RAKE TRUSS W/LOOKOUT BLOCKS 8d 10d 4"EDGE/4"FIELD CEILING SHEATHING: GYPSUM WALLBOARD 5d COOLERS -- 7"EDGE/10"FIELD WALL SHEATHING: —WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS(PLYWOOD STUDS SPACED UP TO 24"O.C. 8d 10d 3"EDGE/12"FIELD 1/2"&25/32"FIBERBOARD PANELS 8d -- 3"EDGE/6"FIELD -- 1/2"GYPSUM WALLBOARD 5d COOLERS -- 7"EDGE/10"FIELD FLOOR SHEATHING: WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS(PLYWOOD) I o\ 1"OR LESS THICKNESS 8d lod 6"EDGE/12"FIELD GREATER THAN 1"THICKNESS 10d 16d 6"EDGE/6"FIELD L� • I I RIDGE VENT TYP.ROOF CONST. 12 -2n8 ROOF RAFTERS DRODF'EE W 2n6's Q16'°.<. EXIST. -SS•COX PLYWOOD ROOF GHEATMING . -ASPNlFE ROOF SHINGLES 12 -15L8.FELT PAPER I MATCH -11"BATT INSULATION - EXIST. Q FLAT CEILINGS(R=38) / TTIC ACCESS THROUGH -2n10RIDGEBOARD EXISTING ATTIC -SIMPSON H 2.5A HURRICANE CLIPS TWOF RAFTER ENDS WATER SHIELD AT BOTTOM IE 3'0-OF ROOFPRO— E TOPOFPLATE / 2x8's 16'o.E \ -WINDW SHBAREN TY/EEN RAF HERS -WINO WASH BARRIERS o n 4 O \—t12'GYP.BOARD \\\\ `CONT.SOFFIT VENTS ry c 3 A A Z / / ON 1.3 STRAPPING \ \ A3 wTOP OF PLATE Q16°'`' \�\ TYP.WALL CONST. 3 AT KNEEWPIL / REMOD. RELOCATED \ ,2112 ISTU11ODSHEATHING - BATH BEDROOM#3 3.SPRAY FOAM INSULATION(N20) F 4.112-GYPSUM BOARD _ E SECOND FLOOR 5.W.C.SHINGLE SIDING SUBFLOOR 6.TYPAR VAPOR BARRIER J EXISTING 2.8's Q 1-- EXISTING BEAM EXISTING BEAM 24'-0- EXIST. ROOF FRAMING PLAN COVERED PORCH NOTES: 1.)ALL ROOF RAFTERS TO BE 2 x 8's 1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED EXITING PATIO 2.)USE N H2.5A HURRICANE CLIPS AT ALLL RAFTERS ENDS ExISTInc vosrsa L 3.)VERIFY GUTTER TYPE/LAYOUT FOOTINGS TO REMAIN W/OWNERS J� SECTION @ BATH/BEDROOM ti - A3 THE DESIGNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IF ANY ®�® COTUIT BAY DESIGN, LLC NEW ADDITION/REMODELING FOR: ERRORSCTION. HEBUILDINGCONTR OR OMISSIONS ME FOUND SCALE : DRAWING NO.: THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO START OF 43 BREWSTER ROAD CONSTRUCTION. CONTRAOOR 1/411 _ 11 011 W ILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT MASHPEE,MA. 02649 COME CES WI WITHGS IFOUT CONSTRUCTION /w` -^) PH.(508)274-1166 FAIR RESIDENCE COMMENCES WITH OUT NOTIFYING THE / FAX(50 )539-9402 DESIGNER OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. ,(^�`J THESE DRAWINGS ARE SOLELY FOR THE USE DATE 23 LONGWOOD AVENUE HYANNISPORT MA OF THEOWNERNOTED.ANYOTHERUSE OF THESE DRAWINGS REOU IRES THE WRITTEN 8/16/2018 CONSENT OF THE OESIGNER UNDER THE 1 ACT OFECTURAL COPYRIGHT PROTECTION Y s . A • . a v 5 s 85 V�1 A 69 69 00 , 6460 - Z Ask : Z _ z a .rt o t � 1 .3550 . g 0�� d a9 d o s O �.Q B _ S IL 5 i ap 1 . o � : 3v fig,.}Z 3o W 0 . N8a Z . PPODERTY.. OF. t or �. 8 •b9 �5 ALLY F. REYOU12 S a .Le i HYANNISPORT. 'MA38 R 0 eec eNerar� ISTItY at wz�6I. neerc Sca wR. - e�„tee �K�aogq. •.:ci�,r .c»q, , 3 H 11 p-M CtNr6RN1uL UCOROPII,