Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0021 BUTTON WOOD LANE - Health
21 Buttonwood Lane ` West Barnstable A=217 2031 (I F t► tom o "� j� 2�rLrz?1�y Barnstable oF TOWN OF BARNS ai BARNSTABLE. ' MASS. a OFFICE OF TOWN ATTORNEY 9°0 t639 367 MAIN STREET I PTEDp HYANNIS, MASSACHUSETTS 02601-3907 2007 RUTH J.WEIL,Town Attorney ruth.weil@town.barnstable.ma.us T. DAVID HOUGHTON, 1st Assistant Town Attorney david.houghton@town.barnstable.ma.us CHARLES S. McLAUGHLIN,JR.,Assistant Town Attorney Charles.mclaughlin@town.barnstable.ma.us CLAIRE R. GRIFFEN, Paralegal/Legal Assistant April 13, 2009 claire.griffen@town.barnstable.ma.us PAMELA D.GORDON, Legal Clerk TEL.508-862-4620 •FAX.508-862-4724 Ms.Jane Saunders Mr. Patrick F. Page 1780 Main Street, Route 6A West Barnstable, MA 02668-1137 r Re: 1780 Route 6A and`21 Buttonwood Lane-, 11 `Q"eA- Our File Ref: #2006-0223 Dear Jane and Patrick: Following several telephone conferences March 30 and April 8 and 9, I left it with Patrick that his suggestion that Jane would apply for an additional lot at 1780 before going ahead with 21 Buttonwood was a good idea. I was speaking with Tom Geiler . about another matter and he didn't think that was a bad idea either. I did tell Patrick that we would keep the offer open on 21 Buttonwood while 1780 went forward. Since Jane is not under.any prohibitions, she can contact the folks at 200 Main if she has questions about the process for 1780. { To recap, when I spoke with you both on March 30 we talked about setting up a meeting with staff about 21 Buttonwood. Since I didn't hear back right away after I called on April 3, I did discuss 21 Buttonwood with Tom McKean and Rob Gatewood on April 7. The consensus was that 21 Buttonwood had a good chance of getting standard wetlands conditions with growback mitigation, a perc test in the C2 layer in test pit number 7 and engineered plans. I even expressed a willingness to contact BSC. The idea was that this would end the war between you and the Town. When I spoke to Patrick on April 8 he said in addition he wanted either compensation or an additional buildable lot at 1780. I said I wouldn't recommend compensation nor linking dividing , 1780 to permitting 21. He called back on the 9th and that's when he mentioned dividing 1780 first. 20060223 pa.-eletterl5 y This changes the previous standing offer(see letter dated Feburary 5, 2009) to meet with Rob, but I agree that it makes sense. There aren't any legal issues with 1780 so you can proceed without my involvement. In fact, I can't and won't be involved,so calls to our office should cease and Jane can deal directly with the folks at 200 Main. Best wishes for success. Sincerely; c /tdh T. DAVID HOUGHTON cc: Tom Geiler Rob.Gatewood Tom McKean g • a 20060223 pageletter15 -- Town of Barnstable FTNE ip� Barnstable Board of Health AFAmerl«CRY BARNSTABLE, : 200 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 y MAss. � . ATFD MA't a 2007 Office: 508-862-4644 Wayne Miller,M.D. FAX: 508-790-6304 Paul Canniff,D.M.D. Junichi Sawayanagi BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 3:00 PM Town Hall, Hearing Room 367 Main Street, Hyannis, MA A regularly scheduled and duly posted meeting of the Barnstable Board of Health was held on May 13, 2008. The meeting was called to order at 3:00 pm by Chairman Wayne Miller, M.D. Also attending were Board Members Paul Canniff, D.M.D. and Junichi Sawayanagi. Thomas McKean, Director of Public Health and Sharon Crocker, Division Assistant, were also present. I. Tobacco Hearing: Hearing- Tobacco: Tobacco violations as reported by Bob Collette of Barnstable County Tobacco Control. A. Big Daddy's Pizza (formerly Cotuit Pantry), 4120 Falmouth Road, Hyannis — Second Offense, tobacco products sold to a minor. This is the second consecutive meeting the owner has not been able to show up for. The Board will consider suspension of license if called before the Board and not attending. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to issue a $100 fine for the second offense. II. Hearing — Housing (Cont.): . Deborah Packard, owner— 226 Long Beach Road, Centerville, MA— housing violation(s). CONTINUED to June 10, 2008 meeting. The Health Inspector is scheduled to inspect the premises for the removal of two bedrooms on May 31, 2008. Provided everything is in order, the issue will be closed. However, if any unresolved issues, the owner MUST attend the next meeting. III. Septic Variances (Cont): A. Patrick Page, Trustee - 21 Buttonwood Lane, West Barnstable, 41,300 square feet parcel, Map/Parcel 217-031, variance for percolation test. Mr. Patrick Page said the law reads, "if you have more than four feet, then the more restricted layer will rule". Page 1 of 9 Dr. Miller. asked if Mr. Page is withdrawing the request for sieve analysis in replacement for a percolation test. Mr. Page said "Yes, he is withdrawing that". Mr. Page asked Dr. Miller. to read into the minutes the May 8, 2008 letter the Board issued to Mr. Page. Mr. Page addressed the letter. The statement "after our first consultation with Brian Dudley (Mr. Page said he only knows that we told him that Brian didn't accept the proposal). Mr. Page stated he went to speak to Hank Farnham and now there is a no-trespassing notice issued. Mr. Page stated Mr. Munsell said to him "no-one told him (Mr. Munsell) that there was a sieve analysis done. Mr. Page said the law reads in a proposed area — you have to do a soil log and the reason is that if it has varying layers of soil then the most restrictive soil will rule. Mr. Page said (in the letter) in reference to first discussion with Brian Dudley, Mr. Page had asked Mr. Dudley if his attorney could be present, etc. and was answered "no." Mr. Page said in reviewing the video of the meeting, Mr. McKean had stated he didn't want to get in the middle between the inspector and Mr. Page's project. Two days we had our inspectors on his lot and then on second day, Mr. McKean was at location. Mr. Page said the second ?Perc or sieve was stopped. Also, he noted in the letter, it needed be disputed that: we had two professional inspectors on site. Item 2 says if the test percolates satisfactorily, or the C2 and C4 are completed and are the same, or if C2 is more restrictive, Mr. Page said in Hole# 6 at C2 and at C4 has the same description of soil and passed. In Hole# 7 where the test stopped, the C4 and C2 are both described as the same soil (fine sand) and, of course, would percolate faster than the other hole. Dr. Miller stated that the fact is that there was never a complete, good percolation done. Mr. Page agreed with this. Dr. Miller said the reason this came up is because all of the various circumstances that have come up. There are many different occurrences and all of the people have come up together and are trying to work out what compromise can be created to meet everyone's needs. Mr. Page designed a plan and came up with a 20 minute percolation test (if it is a 8.8 soil, then it gets bumped up to a ? grade 2 percolation — Mr. Page asked if we are in agreement. (No comment made). Mr. Page said the plan would be changed to be a two-compartment tank for the kitchen. If the Board is in agreement, he will go back to his first engineer and have it revised. Page 2 of 9 Dr. Miller said the changes required are spelled out on the letter: 1) show the one variance, 2) show the strip-out. Dr. Miller said to Tom: In terms of the soil logs that Don signed off on (and Dave Stanton was present as well), does Mr. McKean feel the soils are the same. Mr. M said yes it appears to be the same or, possibly, better. Dr. Miller said if Mr. Page complies with all the conditions in the letter, then...interrupted. Mr. Page wants to hear if he does the items, will the Board approve. Dr. Miller explained the Board can not make a decision without the engineered plans. David Houghton, Town Attorney, addressed the Board. Mr. Houghton reiterated that what Mr. Page's question is: what evidence is the Board looking for to demonstrate that the C2 and the C4 are the same. And 2) what information needs to be put on the set of plans he has, and who has to put it there — is it only an engineer. Dr. Miller stated: he will need an engineer to sign off on the plan. Craig Field, BSC Group is the first engineer. Interruption: ... Mr. P. said you are going to pay; we are going to have a lawsuit. Mr. McKean said based on the soil submitted, the soil samples show that C4 is less restrictive than C2. Final answer. Dr. Miller said if all the plans come through with all we have mentioned and the next soil test is as good as it is, Mr. Page said the whole town is looking at him and making fun of him. Mr. Page said his family has been here forever. The truth is the truth and this has pushed him to the edge and it's an embarrassing situation. Mr. Page says about the Cape not having adequate sewer and the federal government offering money and we didn't take it. Mr. Page said ...due to a few individuals, It was no, until I walked into the state. Mr. Page said he is sorry to talk to the Board as that. Dr. M. said I just want to remind you, you are so close to being successful with this, you should continue with it. Mr. Page said ..what he wanted was to have his life back and to have the house and now the house is gone, and his sister in law is dead (who was to move in). Mr. Page left. B. Peter McEntee, Engineering Works, representing Harold Gramse, Trustee — 98 Vanduzer Road, Barnstable, 22,280 square feet parcel, seven variances due to site constraints (continued from April meeting). Page 3 of 9 Peter McEntee presented a revised plan with the only adjustment being a pressure-dosed plan with the same configurations and with 1 % length laterals. The same variances apply to the revised plan. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve the variances on the plan revised and submitted at the Board meeting 5/13/08, with the following condition: a six-bedroom deed restriction recorded at the Registry of Deeds, and submitted to the Health Division. (Unanimously voted in favor.) IV. Septic Variances (New): A. Mike Aucoin representing Bergenheim Trust, owner— 112 Nyes Neck Road East, Centerville, Map/Parcel 232-011-002, 1.0 acre parcel, repair of septic requesting four variances. Mike Aucoin presented their revised plan and they have done test on the well. The current well is within 30-50 feet of the components of the owners septic. It is, however, over 150 feet away from the neighbor's well. The current septic appears to be 20-25 years old. There is an old steel tank there which has been properly filled and abandoned. There is a leaching field beyond the septic tanks. The plan proposes to move the septic tank 100 feet away from their well. Mr. McKean said the staff comments included a need for another variance from Title V - a variance for the inlet tee as it will be within 12 inches of ground water. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to Continue until the June 10, 2008 Board of Health Meeting. (Unanimously voted in favor.) B. John Lavelle, Coastal Engineering, representing Oyster Harbors Yacht Basin Realty, owner, 122 Bridge Street, Osterville, Map/Parcel 093-009, 1.77 acre parcel, one variance request. John Lavelle presented his plans. Mr. McKean mentioned the staff wanted to know the status of the moon when the test occurred. Mr. Lavelle said it was a full moon. Dr. Canniff. said he was out at the property. It's a difficult piece of property not allowing many choices. The plans do show the pipes are waterproofed — as noted on page two. Dr. Canniff would like to made sure the pipes are sleeved Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve the variance to groundwater (from 12 inches to 11 inches) and with the plan dated November 30, 2007, revision date March 19, 2008. (Unanimously voted in favor.) Page 4 of 9 C. Arlene Wilson representing Cotuit Oyster Company, owner, 26 Little River Road, Cotuit, Map/Parcel 053-009, 0.16 acres, requesting a modification of septic system variance issued 4/29/04. Arlene Wilson presented the plan, along with Mary Leis Kelly, project manager at Cotuit Oyster Company. Cotuit Oyster has owned the property for a long time and had leased the property next door until recently. The Board had approved variances at an earlier date with the stipulations that they use an incinerating toilet and that they have a restriction on property not to use it for residential. Staff had asked for (another) copy of the floor plans and Ms. Wilson has brought them. Ms. Wilson mentioned the changes to be: it was 76 feet from BVW and now it is 69 feet from BVW, 2) it was 8+ feet from property line and now it will be 4 feet to property line, the pump chamber moved a little further away from the BVW. It was 94.5 feet from BVW and it is now 96.6 feet from BVW. There is no change in the number of employees, there will be no changes in flow Our town attorney, Charles McLaughlin, presented that they are within hours of resolving and he feels it will be a good solution. Mary Leis Kelly, Cotuit Oyster Company, said she is asking for a continuance on this. The new owner may want to reserve the right to change the plan. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to CONTINUE until June 10, 2008 BOH meeting. (Unanimously voted in favor.) D. Whitney Wright, owner—4308 Main Street, Barnstable, 145,800 square feet parcel, one variance (postponed from Feb 2008 meeting). Mr. Whitney Wright presented his plan. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Sawayanagi, seconded by Dr. Canniff, the Board voted to accept the plan with the following condition: the water supply of the irrigation well shall be kept separate from the town supply of water. (Unanimously voted in favor.) V. Variance — Food (Cont): John Cotellessa, owner, Original Gourmet Brunch at 517 Main Street, Hyannis, requesting grease trap variance and expansion in seating from 70 to 94. John Cotellessa stated he spoke to Brian Dudley, DEP. Brian explained that because it is on town sewer and town water, he does not need to approve. The business is short 47 gallons on the 94 seats for the grease trap and does not have any place to increase the grease trap. Page 5 of 9 Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve a temporary variance to expire Oct 30, 2008 with the condition that two inspections will be done: in Jun 2008 and Aug 2008 showing the ratio of grease, then bring the results in to the Oct meeting and at that time the Board will use the data to evaluate the frequency needed for future pumping during their heavy season especially. (Unanimously voted in favor.) VI. Variance — Food (New): A. Felis Barreiro, owner of Alberto's Restaurant, 356 Main Street, Hyannis, Map/Parcel 327-004, additional 32 seats with a grease trap variance request. Mr. Barreiro presented his request to have additional seating. He currently has a 3,000 gallon grease trap and has a permit for 198 seats including a function room (which is not always used). Mike Macheras, Schooners, spoke stating his concern that the restaurant's permit broken down by rooms adds up to 256 seats. He is already over the Health Division permit of 228 seats. Mike says Alberto's actual seats are in violation of the permit. Mr. Barreiro said he is negotiating with the town for use of the parking spaces The maximum seats (inside and out) is 250 seats. He requests it be distributed so that he can have 32 seats in the front, 32 in the back, and 198 inside seating. Dr. M. said the seating can be worked out by the inspectors and the owner, but once determined it must stay as that breakout. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve a conditional variance with the condition that it be inspected monthly (Jun- Sep) through the summer showing the ratio of grease and then presented to the Board in Oct 2008 BOH meeting. (Unanimously voted in favor.) B. Swan River Fish Market, 1600 Falmouth Rd — Unit# 12, Centerville, request a toilet facility variance. Mr. Al Burns, Swan River Fish Market, said the menu will be basically the same as the Osterville Fish Market Too, and there will only be two employees and only a take-out menu and hopes to open in early Jun 2008. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve the toilet facility variance for one toilet. (Unanimously voted in favor. VII. Variance —Temporary Food (New): A. First annual maritime festival event "SeaCotuit" for May 24-25, 2008, on the Village Green, Main Street, Cotuit. Page 6 of 9 Mr. Jim Power spoke of the first annual maritime festival event. A tent will be set up and four local food establishments will serve their food and the fifth table will be Cotuit Federated Church will have sodas/water. Two old-time trolleys will be available to keep the parking available at the school and ball park. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Caniiff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve the annual event of SeaCotuit with the condition that the two portable toilets be ordered with running water. (Unanimously voted in favor.) B. Leticia Durham, Harry's Cajun Restaurant, sponsoring "Spring Blues Festival" on May 25, 2008, at 350 Stevens Street (outdoors), Hyannis as a fundraiser for the Duffy Health Center. Leticia Durham and Alicia presented the event. The only supplier will be Harry's Cajun Restaurant. They will prepare the food inside Harry's and put into chaffing dishes. The event will be May 6 from 1-6 pm. They will have four portable toilets with water. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Sawayanagi, seconded by Dr. Canniff, the Board voted to approve the Spring Blues Festival event. (Unanimously voted in favor.) C. John Rega representing "Taste of Cape Cod" to be held on May 26, 2008 at Resort & Conference Center, 35 Scudder Road, Hyannis as a fundraiser for the Family Food Pantry. John Rega presented the event. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Sawayanagi, seconded by Dr. Canniff, the Board voted to approve the "Taste of Cape Cod" event. (Unanimously voted in favor.) D. Cape Cod Life sponsoring a food event "Food and Wine Festival with a Taste of Culture on June 1, 2008 at Rectrix Aerodrome, Barnstable Road, Hyannis. Mimi presented the events for Cape Cod Life. There will be a "dualling chefs event with six different chefs, and they will have a refrigerated truck outside the Rectrix and a truck with ice will be on site. There will be two coolers at each table. E. Cape Cod Life sponsoring Food and Wine Festival on June, 4, 2008, at Cotuit Center for the Arts, Falmouth Road, Cotuit with two vendors, Siena and Regatta of Cotuit. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve with the contingency that it meets Mr. McKean and his staff Page 7 of 9 F. Cape Cod Life sponsoring a "Boat Show" food event on June 14-15, 2008, at the harbor, Ocean Street, Hyannis. Approved for one vendor, Mario. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Sawayanagi, seconded by Mr. G. BayBridge Clubhouse sponsoring "Local Fest" on June 20, 2008 on Hyannis Village Green as fundraiser for Department of Mental Health. Vill. Subdivision # 767 - Modification of Definitive Plan: Down Cape Engineering representing Penelope Hinckley, owner - Modification of the Definitive Plan at 620 Main Street, West Barnstable, Map and Parcel 157-004, private wells, on-site sewerage disposal system, scheduled to be heard at the May 12, 2008 Planning Board Meeting. No objections to the Subdivision# 767 as on the plan, originally dated 3/20/00 with revised date 2/8/08. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to send a letter to the Planning Board of approval of the proposed plan. (Unanimously voted in favor.) IX. Correspondence/Updates: A. Correspondence from John Lebica, Cape Cod Community College. Correspondence read. B. Draft ordinance to permit absentee board members who participated in adjudicatory hearings, to continue to participate. Dr. Miller suggests deferring the decision to accept the draft until after he has an opportunity to meet with the town attorney. He is concerned with using only audio recording as it sometimes is difficult to hear. He would be happier if the video is the criteria. Dr. Canniff said the Mullin Rule must be something that's already been scrutinized. Dr. Canniff acknowledged that for a three member board it would be useful. The Board agreed with him and will wait to speak to the town attorney. C. Letter from Lombardo Associates regarding Nitrex Nitrogen Removal Technology. The Board acknowledged it is another alternative, but noted, it is a big cost for a short-term solution. They discussed the possibility of bringing Sue Rask in for a special meeting to discuss the alternative. X. Emergency Septic Repair: 245 Mitchell's Way, Hyannis Page 8 of 9 Mr. McKean presented the plan for an emergency plan for 245 Mitchell's Way, Hyannis with setback variances Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi. (Unanimously voted in favor.) Voted to Adjourn. 6:15 pm. Page 9 of 9 1'... `9i 2008 15:36 FAX 508 790 6226 TOWN MANAGER � HEALTH �002 ---- �'790 6:, 317 The Town of Barnstable Barh-tom le air- Office of Town Manager li; caCr ZIP" L 0 367 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 f t �IE3d�C�IE€tr. � www.town.barnstable.ma.us 2007 Cfifzce: 508-352-4610 Tav 508-790-•6226 1=:mffl: 'Tc��z l:encb(a)town barnstable.ma.us Thomas K Lynch,Assistant Town Mara;e• 11&Ly 9, 2008 1vir. Patrick Page l B ttonwood-Lane � 'WtBaxstable,,MA 02668 NO TRESPASS ORDER TEMPORARY SUSPENSION BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING MAY 13 the No Trespass Order issued against you dated April 23,2008 is temporarily suspended during the time and location of the May 13 Board of Health meeting to allow you to attend the continuation of your variance application. The order still applies to all other Town property except the immediate area of the meeting and access to it and returns to full effect following the meeting allowing a reasonable time for you to exit. Thank you. / Thomas K. Lynch Assistant Town ManaCer 'i Gc: Board of Health r C �t y ' ' f —_—€Q;4 008 15:35 FAX 508 790 6226 TOWN MANAGED HEALTH 0001. ®ate May 9, 2008 ` Number of pages including cover sheet sl°lo: P ` rrn P�AcWIGe®n From: Town Manager's Office Town of Barnstable 367 Main street r Hyannis, Mfg 02601 .ir'ho�a: Phone: 508-862-4610 Fax: 508-790-6226 a REAIIAd9 'CS: Urgent For your review Reply ASAP Please Comment Forn, Pleai; a .arranige for a police officer to be present during this hearing. 4 d Y'a 4 b Town of Barnstable SAEtN51Af3LE. �$ MASS ,0� Regulatory Services Department Public Health Division 200 Main Street, Hyannis MA 0260.1 Office: 508-862-4644 Thomas F.Geiler,Director FAX: 508-790-6304 Thomas A.McKean,CHO May 5, 2008 Mr. Patrick Paige 1780 Main Street West Barnstable, Massachusetts 02668 Rer-21 Buttonwood Lane West Barnstable, MAC Dear Mr. Paige: This letter will confirm the results of a discussion that was held on May 2 between Brian Dudley of DEP, myself,Dr. Miller and Tom Geiler. You submitted an application on March 24 asking for a variance from 310 CMR 15.104 to substitute a sieve analysis for percolation tests in the C4 layer of test pit# 6 on your property. Brian Dudley was consulted as to the feasibility of this approach. After our first consultation with Brian and apparently at your request, he asked to meet with us to discuss it and we agreed. The outcome of that discussion was as follows. 1. A certified soil evaluator needs to schedule and perform a second percolation test at ° the above referenced site in the C2 layer(in undisturbed soil) as per Title V (310 CMR 15.104(4), witnessed by the Board of Health or agent(s) of the Board of Health. 2. If the C2 layer percolates satisfactorily again in a second location, and the Board is satisfied that the C2 and C4 layers are essentially the same, or the Board of Health would have to be satisfied by the soil evaluator that the C4 layer is less restrictive than the C2 layer. 3. If# 1 and 2 above pass, you could proceed with an application for variance from the Town of Barnstable Marginal Lot Regulation as if the lot percolated satisfactorily: in other words, you would not need the sieve analysis variance you now have pending. For the Marginal Lot Variance, the Board requires submission of fully designed septic and site plans, designed by a professional engineer or registered sanitarian, which includes a strip out of the C3 layer. a 4. If the Board of Health grants you the Marginal Lot Variance requested, you can then proceed with an application for a disposal works construction permit for this property. If you wish to undertake this approach, you should have your soil evaluator and/or registered sanitarian contact me to acknowledge and make arrangements. In that event, you would not need to continue seeking the variance for sieve analysis. If you do not wish to take this approach, you could proceed with your sieve analysis variance request, but it appears from all our conversations with Brian Dudley that DEP would not approve such a variance which would make any Board approval moot. Very truly yours, s c ean, R.S., HO Director of Public Health tm/ejw gApaige,buttonwood\05.02.08 ltr to paige re septic system.doc I 4 � Town of Barnstable FTHE tp� Barnstable Board of Health AHAWtaCity sARNSTABLE. 200 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 9 MASS. 1639• �0 AtFD Mp'1 A 2007 Office: 508-862-4644 Wayne Miller,M.D. FAX: 508-790-6304 Paul Canniff;D.M.D. Junichi Sawayanagi BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, April 8, 2008 at 3:00 PM Town Hall, Hearing Room 367 Main Street, Hyannis, MA A regularly scheduled and duly posted meeting of the Barnstable Board of Health was held on April 8, 2008. The meeting was called to order at 3:00 pm by Chairman Wayne Miller, M.D. Also attending were Board Members Paul Canniff, D.M.D. and Junichi Sawayanagi. Thomas McKean, Director of Public Health and Sharon Crocker, Division Assistant, were also present. I. Hearing- Tobacco: Tobacco violations as reported by Bob Collette of Barnstable County Tobacco Control. A. Hearing: 1. CVS # 2322, 176 North Street, Hyannis — First Offense, tobacco products sold to a minor. Jennifer Drowski, General Manager and Store Manager Christine were present and acknowledged they were interested to have the hearing proceeding today without the presence of Mr. Collette. They stated that the employee was fired and they reviewed the requirements with employees and had them sign-the- regulation sheet again. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to issue a warning as the First Offense. (Unanimously voted in favor.) 2. Christy's #610, 317 Falmouth Road, Hyannis — First Offense (in six years), tobacco products sold to a minor. Jennifer Daritol, Manager of Operations, was present and acknowledged she was interested to have the hearing proceeding today without the presence of Mr. Collette. She noted the employee was suspended for a week without pay and reviewed the requirements with all employees again. They noted they have sold 24,000 cigarettes without a violation. Upon a motion duly made by Junichi Sawayanagi, seconded by Dr. Canniff, the Board voted to issue a warning as the First Offense. (Unanimously voted in favor.) Q:\MMUTEM2008 Minutes\04082008 Minutes.doc Page 1 Of 8 3. Sav-On, 590 lyannough Rd (Rte 132), Hyannis — First Offense, tobacco products sold to a minor and smoking inside building. Jay Imad was present and acknowledged he was interested to have the hearing proceeding today without the presence of Mr. Collette. Upon a motion duly made by Junichi Sawayanagi, seconded by Dr. Canniff, the Board voted to issue a warning as the First Offense. (Unanimously voted in favor.) Requested 4. Big Daddy's Pizza (formerly Cotuit Pantry), 4120 Falmouth Postpone to May 13 Road, Hyannis — Second Offense, tobacco products sold to a minor. 5. Hess Express, 149 North Street, Hyannis — Second Offense, tobacco products sold to a minor. Mr. Pat Dudley was present and acknowledged he was interested to.have the hearing proceeding today without the presence of Mr. Collette. His company policy required termination of the employee and she was terminated. Mr. Dudley spoke of their new incentive program. Employees are given the opportunity to answer the tobacco regulation questions daily and the first to answer correctly receives $20 which goes into a pool to be rewarded to the employee that has the most correct answers per month. *The Board also mentioned in general that businesses might consider not terminating people on their first error. They might have good success by adjusting the policy to possibly suspend an employee for a week without pay as seen above (Christy's), or something in that fashion. This would allow a business to keep a good employee and the employee would be careful to avoid the consequences again. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Junichi Sawayanagi, the Board voted to issue a $100 Fine as the Second Offense. (Unanimously voted in favor.) II. Hearing — Housing (Cont.): Can not Attend Deborah Packard, owner—226 Long Beach Road, Centerville, MA — Sent Status. housing violation(s). S. Crocker, Division Assistant, stated Deborah Packard stated she would not be able to attend (she is out of town). Ms. Packard faxed a statement saying that two bedrooms have been eliminated and the work is complete. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to Continue to the May Board of Health Meeting and have an inspection by the Health Division to verify the work is complete. (Unanimously voted in favor.) III. Septic Variances: Postponed until A. Whitney Wright, owner—4308 Main Street, Barnstable, 145,800 Q:\MINUTES\2008 Minutes\04082008 Minutes.doc Page 2 of 8 May 13 MTG square feet parcel, one variance (postponed from Feb 2008 meeting). B. Lisa Lyons representing James and Valerie Lane, owners — 86 Summerbell Avenue, Centerville, 0.11 acre parcel, 4 variances for septic repair. Lisa Lyons and James Lane were present. They presented their data. The original system was a 2 bedroom. Then in 1991, a septic permit 91-446 was issued for a remodel of dormers, etc. the permit was to add three infiltrators to the cesspool. The Board states that the system was never built for.four bedrooms as three Infiltrators would work for four bedrooms. At this time, the system is in failure and the number of bedrooms is four. The owner is firm on his belief that he had done everything appropriate to have the four bedrooms years ago, and they are not interested in eliminating a bedroom. If they can get an I/A system (which allows for a reduction in SAS field), then they may be able to have enough space to improve the situation. Bob Silva spoke for his technology, White Night Treatment System (which will be presented later in the meeting). His technology allows for a 50% reduction for SAS. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to 1) allow Thomas McKean to allow a septic permit to proceed with a plan that allows only setback variances without a reduction in SAS size, or 2) that allows the currently proposed reduction in size SAS system, or an I/A system with setback variances, or to put in a standard system for three bedrooms and adjust the fourth bedroom to eliminate it as a bedroom. (Unanimously voted in favor.) C. Peter McEntee, Engineering Works, representing Harold Gramse, Trustee — 98 Vanduzer Road, Barnstable, 22,280 square feet parcel, seven variances due to site constraints. Peter McEntee presented his plan which included a sieve analysis. They had dug down 36 feet and put in pipes to judge the elevations. The elevation maximum level was at 12.03 feet. The cellar floor is at 14.25 feet. There is only a couple feet difference. Currently the ground water is above the invert to the tank, however, it still flushes out the septic. He is interested in digging down to 12 feet and have four feet to Infiltrators. Peter McEntee said he has shown the plan to Brian Dudley, DEP, who also recommended some items, ie, pressure dosing. This is a failed system. There are six bedrooms. He interprets Title V to read that 'the two-compartment tank required with two kitchens applies only when there are 1) multi-users and 2) when more than 1000 gallons of water is used daily. His plan does not contain two-compartment, however, he did choose the tank size with this in mind and met the requirements of the top tank (1,500 gallon pump Q:\MINUTES\2008 Minutes\04082008 Minutes.doc Page 3 of 8 chamber) to handle 48 hrs of use (660 gal x 2 days= 1300), along with the second tank (1,000 gallon storage) to handle 24 hr (660 gallons) Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to Continue to the May 13, 2008 Board of Heatlh meeting to allow time for the Board to discuss the plan with Brian Dudley, DEP. (Unanimously voted in favor.) D. Peter McEntee, Engineering Works, representing Ernest and Dianna Bovi, owners — 14 Briarcliff Lane, Centerville, 11,000 square feet parcel, M/P 208-105, I/A system with five variances due to site constraints. Peter McEntee presented his plan and reviewed the sieve analysis on this high elevation. He had revised plans with minor variations. There is now a retaining wall where the shed is and the shed will be moved to another location. He proposes a timber wall around the outside of the mound. Susan Simon spoke for her aunt, an abutter. Ms. Simon spoke of concern of whether heavy equipment will drive over her septic as the lots are small. Mr. McEntee said the dog's chain link fence will be removed and they will access through there. Ms. Simon explained the only concern her aunt will have is the looks of the mound and appreciates vegetation being placed above the timber wall. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve the revised plan dated 4/08/08 with four variances: 1) variance for sieve analysis in lieu of percolation test, 2) a reduction to the requirement of a 12" separation between inlet and outlet pipes servicing the septic tank/pump chamber and high groundwater, and 3) a setback variance from the 100 feet to 66 feet from SAS to wetlands, and 4) a setback variance from 100 feet to 84 feet from septic tank to wetlands, with the following conditions: 1) a two-bedroom deed restriction will be recorded at the Registry of Deeds, 2) a proper copy will be submitted to the Health Division, and 3) vegetation will be planted along the top of the timber wall to high the mound which will be planted every three feet or according to the nursery instructions. (Unanimously voted in favor.) E. David Coughanowr, R.S., representing Elisabeth Margaret Ricci, owners — 8-10 Sunset Avenue, Centerville, 5,800 square feet parcel, four variances requested. ,David Coughanowr and Mr. Ricci presented the plans. David used a more restrictive determination of the groundwater. Mr. McKean would recommend a monitoring of the groundwater or the use of high tide as the tool for groundwater. This would reduce the size of the retaining was of 4.35 feet. A,two-compartment tank will be needed. Q:\MINUTES\2008 Minutes\04082008 Minutes.doc Page 4 of 8 Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve the plan pending the final Growth Management Determination based on a test well for the height of the foundation and wall., 2) a revised plan be submitted to show a two-compartment tank. (Unanimously voted in favor.) F. Patrick Page, Trustee - 21 Buttonwood Lane, West Barnstable, 41,300 square feet parcel, Map/Parcel 217-031, variance for percolation test. Patrick Page presented his plan. Dave Linsell spoke to the Board. He has been a state inspector and witnessed over 200 percolation tests. Dr. Miller said he will go to the DEP and review the case for Mr. Page and see what the DEP's opinion is before Mr. Page spends any more money. Mr. Munsell is someone Mr. Page would accept being involved with the processs. IV. Variance — Food (New): Withdrew A. Elizabeth Wurfbain representing Hyannis Farmers Market— change in Request location to Village Green next to the School Building, same schedule as prior years: weekly on Wednesdays in summer. B. John Cotellessa, owner, Original Gourmet Brunch at 517 Main Street, Hyannis, requesting grease trap variance and expansion in seating from 70 to 94. Also,a variance request from toilet facilities from 4 to 3 toilets. John Cotellessa presented the issue that the restaurant does not have any additional space which would be needed to put a grease recovery device as a supplement to the 1,000 gallon grease trap outside. Normally, it would be required for the additional seating. Mr. Cotellessa is proposing that the Board grant the variance with the condition that the restaurant pump,the outside grease trap more often to meet its needs. Mr. McKean read the regulations which states that prior approval by the DEP is required in this situation, whenever the person is not capable of expanding the grease trap. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted on the toilet facility variance. (Unanimously voted in favor.) The Board will continue the variance for a grease trap to allow the owner to speak with DEP. C. Peter Sullivan, Sullivan Engineering, representing Hyannis Harbor Tours (HyLine Cruises), 230 Ocean Street, Hyannis, requesting toilet facility variance. Q:\MINUTES\2008 Minutes\04082008 Minutes.doe Page 5 of 8 Peter Sullivan and Hy-Line owner presented the plan. A discussion took place regarding an additional double-compartment sink needed. This will be dealt with at a later time once the owner is able to review. The first floor has the kitchen preparation and the employees will be required to go upstairs for the toilet facility. They will be using touchless faucets. One unisex toilet will be used upstairs. All the toilets are handicap and an outside 1,000 gallon grease trap is in place. The second floor outside dining area must be separated by a partition and screening / air curtain from the raw bar food preparation area to prevent the entrance of insects and rodents from entering into the parent establishment. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve the plans with three toilet facilities with the condition that the raw bar and outside dining area must be separated by proper screening to prevent entrance of insects and rodents. (Unanimously voted in favor.) D. Hal Choubah, Choubah Engineering Group, representing Khalil Naoum of West Main Gas, 577 West Main Street, Hyannis, requesting toilet facility variance and grease trap variance. Hal Choubah represented the variance request. A 50 pound grease trap was installed. The food is all pre-packed except for the hot dogs (approximately 200 sold per year.) The main business is not the food. The store is 1,170 square feet. The regulation states that a business with less than 1,200 square feet E. Nancy Magnuson representing Paul Mazzeo of Kandy Korner Gifts, 474 Main Street, Hyannis, map and parcel 308-078, requests a grease trap variance. No grease trap or GRD required. Only an interceptor. V. Disposal Works Installer Applicants: A. James Zarella, Marshfield, MA Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve James Zarella as a Disposal Works Installer. (Unanimously voted in favor.) B. Christian D. Turner, Sagamore Beach, MA Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to approve Christin Turner as a Disposal Works Installer. (Unanimously voted in favor.) Meeting Room change: Q:\MINUTES\2008 Minutes\04082008 Minutes.doc Page 6 of 8 6:45pm The Board of Health announced that the Hearing Room is not available to continue the meeting. There were no objections to continue the meeting in the Selectmen's Room without the taping of the meeting. The clerk will record the minutes. VI. Subdivision # 817 - Definitive Plan: Michael Dunning, Attorney representing Peter Jenkins, Jr., Definitive Plan at 361 Parker Road, West Barnstable, Map and.Parcel 176-021, private wells, on-site sewerage disposal system, requesting a variance from the Board of Health's Decision of March 11, 2008 to individual I/A systems on each lot. Michael Dunning said he seeks reconsideration from 1650 Ruling and prefers individual I/A systems instead of a Shared I/A System for the development. Lot 5 has an existing house which will be required to change the septic to an I/A system only once the system has failed or if the owner wants to increase the flow. Mr. Dunning stated there are only four empty lots to be developed and they are not expected to be developed simultaneously, along with the fact that the number of bedrooms may vary. Mr. Dunning proposed the developer will put wording in the deeds and in the government of the group of properties and in the plan that each property desiring more than two bedrooms will require an I/A system. A quitclaim deed will be recorded with each lot to reflect this. Arlene Wilson spoke of her concern and asks that the Board of Health also require the system(s) be fully compliant to Title V and fully compliant to all town regulations as well to ensure it would require more setback to the wetlands. Ms. Wilson stated the Planning Board has not been given any percolation information and the plan designer has been asking for all waivers from everything pertaining to the percolations. The engineer spoke and said the above statements are not correct. All percolation information has been given and all waivers have been dropped. The question arose "How is the owner of the cranberry bog allowed to flood the bogs and impact Lot 1"? The Board explained there are long-existing agricultural farm rights that are granted more rights than ordinary land holders. Upon a motion duly made by Dr. Canniff, seconded by Mr. Sawayanagi, the Board voted to make the following recommendation to the Planning Board with the following conditions: • Prior to obtaining a disposal works construction permit, the applicant shall obtain a well construction permit for each lot. Each well shall be sampled and analyzed for pH, coli form bacteria, nitrate-nitrogen, VOC's, and all the other parameters required per Board of Health standards. • Each septic system shall be designed and constructed in compliance with Title 5, the State Environmental Code, and all local Health Regulations. Q:\MINUTES\2008 Minutes\04082008 Minutes.doc Page 7 of 8 • Innovative-alternative (I/A) nitrogen reduction technology, such as sand filter systems, shall be incorporated into the design and construction of the septic systems on Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4. However, I/A technology will not be required on any specified lot(s) which will contain two (2) bedrooms or less. • Wastewater effluent testing shall be conducted at each I/A testing port in accordance with the established standards of the Board of Health. • The existing septic system located on Lot #5 may be used and maintained as it currently exists. However, when/if this system fails and/or when/if an increase in flow is proposed at this particular lot, innovative/alternative (I/A) nitrogen reduction technology shall be incorporated into the design and construction of the new or upgraded septic system on this Lot. • A quitclaim deed shall be recorded for each lot individually identifying the fact that innovative/alternative technology was incorporated into the septic system construction, requiring proper operation and additional maintenance and testing. • Each lawn area created must be covered by at least four (4) inches of loam. • All tree stumps, brush and building debris removed when clearing lots or roads must be disposed of at a licensed solid waste disposal facility. Chipping brush and tree stumps is an acceptable alternative. Burial on site is prohibited. • The Board of Health recommends that all drainage be contained onsite at each lot. • The applicant must receive an Order of Conditions from the Conservation Commission, where applicable. (Unanimously, voted in favor.) The Board voted unanimously to adjourn. Adjourned at 7:30pm. QAMINUTES\2008 Minutes\04082008 Minutes.doc Page 8 of 8 'p OE IME tp DATE: � FEE: * BARNSrABLE. • < y MASS. 639� REC. BY - Town of Barnstable SCHED. DATE: 4 Q FWd Board of Health 200 Main Street, Hyannis MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4644 Wayne A.Miller,M.D. FAX: 508-790-6304 Paul J.Canniff,D.M.D. VARIANCE REQUEST FORM LOCATION Property Address: c�/ �U %�✓t�Jc�OQ' llil�. /11J�5/ t"�'► lf��� Assessor's Ma and Parcel Number: _p �% Size of Lot: 411, 33 5� Wetlands Within 300 Ft. Yes Business Name: _ No _ Subdivision Name: ' er0 IV e �7y APPLICANT'S NAME: Phone _5D �- ,��,;I Did the owner of the property authorize you to kpresent him or her? Yes No PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME CONTACT PERSON j Name:. :C jjgrx[A` YJ6�1 Name: 94 e— Address: `'� - Address: Phone: 2a, k—(, _ 4ep a Phone: ,j, 3L d9" 416>1 VARIANCE FROM REGULATION(List Reg.) REASON FOR VARIANCE(May attach if more space needed)`, l�Z:Y'r�(rm /.L. ;6il �/ /f a1* -//SI S ` �i- f b emle /5-1 ILI)q 6 T clue I Cz-,C''`6V-5 1a ro(5 f NATURE OF WORK: House Addition ❑❑❑❑❑❑ House Rend`vation ❑ Repof Failed Septic System El Checklist (to be completed by office staff-person receiving variance request application) Please submit copies in 4 separate completed sets. _ Four(4)copies of the completed variance request form - Four(4)copies of engineered plan submitted(e.g.septic system plans)_ _ Four(4)copies of labeled dimensional floor plans submitted(e.g.house plans or restaurant kitchen plans) Signed letter stating that the property owner authorized you to represent him/her for this request G? _ Applicant understands that the abutters must be notified by certified mail at least ten days prior to meeting date at`ap licant s expense (for Title V and/or local sewage regulation variances only) Full menu submitted(for grease trap variance requests only) Z- - — ra Variance request application fee collected(no fee for lifeguard modification renewals,grease trap variance renewa [same owner/leasee only], outside dining variance renewals[same owner/leasee only],and variances to repair failed sewage disposal systems [o ly if no`&pansiog to the building proposed]) Variance request submitted at least 15 days prior to meeting date VARIANCE APPROVED Wayne Miller,Chairman NOT APPROVED Paul J.Canniff,D.M.D. REASON FOR DISAPPROVAL Q:\Application Forms\VARIREQ.DOC i 1 G> � art` �� c�,,. S` -• ` MAIL IN REQUESTS -cam Cj-t S Please mail the completed variance application form to the address below. Also include four 1�J copies of engineering plans, house plans, authorization letter, etc (see check-list below). In addition, please include the required fee amount (see fees at bottom of this page). Make $85.00 check payable to: Town of Barnstable. Our mailing address is: Town of Barnstable Public Health Division 200 Main Street Hyannis, MA 02601 Checklist _ Four(4)copies of the completed variance request form _ Four(4)copies of engineered plan submitted(e.g.septic system plans) _ Four(4)copies of labeled dimensional floor plans submitted(e.g.house plans or restaurant kitchen plans) _ Signed letter stating that the property owner authorized you to represent him/her for this request _ Applicant understands that the abutters must be notified by certified mail at least ten days prior to meeting date at applicant's expense (for Title V and/or local sewage regulation variances only) _ Full menu submitted(for grease trap variance requests only) _ $85.00 variance request application fee (no fee for lifeguard modification renewals, grease trap variance renewals [same owner/leasee only], outside dining variance renewals[same owner/leasee only],and variances to repair failed sewage disposal systems[only if no expansion to the building proposed]) Variance request submitted at least 15 days prior to meeting date FOR FAXED REQUESTS Our fax number is (508) 790-6304. Please fax a completed application form. Also, you must mail the required $85.00 fee. Please make the check payable to: Town of Barnstable. The check must be mailed to the address listed above. In addition, please mail four copies of engineered plans, house plans, authorization letter, etc. (see check-list below): Checklist _ Four(4)copies of engineered plan submitted(e.g.septic system plans) _ Four(4)copies of labeled dimensional floor plans submitted(e.g.house plans or restaurant kitchen plans) _ Signed letter stating that the property owner authorized you to represent him/her for this request _ Applicant understands that the abutters must be notified by certified mail at least ten days prior to meeting date at applicant's expense (for Title V and/or local sewage regulation variances only) _ Full menu submitted(for grease trap variance requests only) _ $85.00 variance request application fee(no fee for lifeguard modification renewals, grease trap variance renewals [same owner/leasee only], outside dining variance renewals[same owner/leasee only],and variances to repair failed sewage disposal systems[only if no expansion to the building proposed]) Variance request submitted at least 15 days prior to meeting date For further assistance on any item above, call (508) 862-4644 Back to Main Public Health Division Page , - 1 Ry - � 10HETp � DATE: FEE: � J V , 0 BARNSrABLE, " 9 MASS. fb 1639, �0 REC. BY A'f059. Town of Barnstable Allew0p) SCHED. DATE: Board of Health 200 Main Street, Hyannis MA 02601 Office: 508-862-4644 Wayne A.Miller,M.D. FAX: 508-790-6304 Paul J.Canniff,D.M.D. VARIANCE REQUEST FORM LOCATION Property Address: Assessor's Ma and Parcel Number: �1 p / " -'-3 Size of Lot:�f/ 3. Wetlands Within 300 Ft. Yes 1-/ Business Name: _ No Subdivision Name: �i1` `��`' 0 if f APPLICANT'S NAME: I Phone 5&, f- -,5[,., -�/-o// Did the owner of the property authorize you to represent him or her? Yes No PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME CONTACT PERSON Tr- / ✓ Name: -�� `� �'G 7-rL; T Name: YI L-4 /-�t r� c Address 5' . <tt j 5 "�'G'-� Address: i iG• 7' r' l rt Phone: i', - T - [fr��/ Phone: 5-6 Y- 36 VARIANCE FROM REGULATION(List Res.) REASON FOR VARIANCE(May attach if more space needed) -- ,• �.� ice:Y"'¢G����'I �r SfC✓rim Lcii(.=�(i Si S /rl ,iL.'<c� mac{ , NATURE OF WORK: House Addition ❑❑❑❑❑❑ House Rendvation ❑ Repair of Failed Septic System ❑ Checklist (to be completed by office staff-person receiving variance request application) Please submit copies in 4 separate completed sets. Four(4)copies of the completed variance req,.test form _ Four(4)copies of engineered plan submitted(e.g.septic system plans) _ Four(4)copies of labeled dimensional floor plans submitted(e.g.house plans or restaurant kitchen plans) t - Signed letter stating that the property owner authorized you to represent him/her for this request `- _ :Applicant understands that the abutters must be notified by certified mail at least ten days prior to meeting date at applicant expense� r Tillet V and/or local sewage regulation variances only) _ Full menu submitted(for grease trap variance requests only) Variance request application fee collected(no fee for lifeguard modification renewals,grease trap Variance renewals[same owner/leasee only], outside dining variance renewals[same owner/leasee only],and variances to repair failed sewage disposal systems [only if' no expansion to the building proposed]) Variance request submitted at least 15 days prior to meeting date VARIANCE APPROVED Wayne Miller,Chairman NOT APPROVED Paul J.Canniff,D.M.D. REASON f-11$,n'If R V; �, 1-41 3;�.pp_:-cation Forms\`✓ARIDEQ.DOC 4 Patrick F. Page Trustee, JDS Realty Trust 1780 Main Street, Route 6A West Barnstable, MA 02668 March 24, 2008 Town of Barnstable Board of Health Town Office 200 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601 To the Members of the Board and Whom It May Concern: I, Patrick Page, Trustee of 21 Buttonwood Lane (Parcel ID 217-031 —Lot 10 —Corner lot Route 6A and Buttonwood Lane—west), would like to have a discussion of a project in.=�' progress at said site at the next Board of Health meeting. Attached please find 4 duplicate copies of a request concerning this project. Please note that some of the information therein is inconclusive due to the complexity of said project. I will be providing additional information before and/or during that meeting to help answer any questions that may arise during the discussion. I am looking forward to participating and hopeful of the outcome of the meeting. Thank you for the opportunity to come before the Board. Sincerely, Patrick Page BARNSTABL'E J. nniVersary LAND'TRUST/ P.O.Box 224,Cotuit, MA 02635.Office:407 North Street, Hyannis•508.771.2585 To: Town of Barnstable Board of Health 200 Main Street Hyannis MA 02601 — Date: April 2,2008 Re: Variance Request for 21 Buttonwood Map 217 - Parcel 031 Dear Members of the Barnstable Board of Health; The Barnstable Land Trust has received notification of the request for a variance from the requirements of the percolation test called for in regulation 310 CMR 15.104. Barnstable Land Trust (BLT) is the sole abutter to the property at 21 Buttonwood in West Barnstable. In that area BLT holds 16 acres of land that is dedicated to the protection of the local wildlife, ground water and surface.waters. The area in general is sensitive land, the development of which will impact the natural resources of the Barnstable Harbor Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC). Records indicate that this property was purchased by the current owner in 2002 for $15,000—a price that reflects that it was not considered a house lot. Like many parcels of land in and around the ACEC, the ability to develop the property at 21 Buttonwood is marginal. Special considerations by the Board of Health that fallow four a variance for new construction on this property may set a precedent and inadvertently encourage new development of other marginal properties. , So we simply ask that you adhere to the letter of the law when making your 6ecis ion. > { Sincerely, CD r Jaci Barton Executive Director FORM 11 - SOILEEVALUATOR FORM Page 1 of 3 No . Date: 10/1'5/07---� Commonwealth of Massachusetts F W. BARNSTABLE ,Massachusetts SOil Suitahilit-y Assessment for On Site S wage Disp sal Performed By: DANIEL B. JOHNSON Date : 10/9/07 Witnessed By: DONALD DESMARAIS Address : 21 BUTTONWOOD LANE Owner: PATRICK PAGE Lot jj : W. BARNSTABLE Address :1780 MAIN ST, W. BARNSTABLE Telephone # (508) 280-4011 NEW CONS�'RUCTION X REPAIR Office Reviev� Published Soil Survey Available: No Yes X Year Published 1981 Publication Scale 1" = 2083, Soil Map Unit PsB Drainage Class A Soil Limitations Surf_cial Geologic Report Available: No X Yes Year Published Publication Scale Geologic Material (Map Unit) Landform Flood insurance Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary No Yes `n'ithin00 year flood boundary No Yes Within 100 year flood boundary No Yes lational Wetland Inventory Map (map unit) Wet'.ands Conservancy Program Map (map unit) Current 'dater Resource Conditions (USGS) : Month Range : Above Normal Normal Below Normal Other References Reviewed: FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 2 of 3 Location Address or Lot No 21 BUTTONWOOD LANE, W. BARNSTABLE ON-SITE REVIEW Deep Hole Number: TP-7 Date: 10/9/07 Time: 10:00 Weather: PTLY SUNNY 60 F Location (identify on site plan) Land Use: LAWN Slope() : LEVEL - 2% Surface stones: NOT OBS Vegetation: MAPLE Landform: OUTWASH PLAIN Position on landscape (sketch on the back page) : - Distances from: Open Water Body: - feet Drainage Way: - feet Possible Wet Area: 100 feet Property Line: 10 fee* Drinking Water Well: - feet Other: DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Depth from Soil Horizon Soil texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface (inches) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure, Stones, Boulders, Consistency, a Gra%vI) 0" - 40" FILL (SAND) 40" - 53" Ab FINE SANDY 10YR4/3 FRIABLE, < 5% PEAT LOAM 53" - 66" C1 CLAY LOAM 2.5Y6/2 FIRM 66" - 92" C2 FINE-MED. GLEYED FRIABLE SAND 92" - 162" C3 PEAT W/FINE 10YR2/1 FRIABLE SAND 16211- 228" C4 FINE-MED. GLEYED FRIABLE SAND MINIMUM OF 2 HOLES REQUIRED AT EVERY PROPOSED DISPOSAL AREA Parent Material (geologic) GLACIAL OUTWASH Depth to Bedrock: NOT OBS Depth to Groundwater: Weeping from Pit Face: 9211 Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater: FORM 11 - SOIL EVALUATOR FORM Page 3 of 3 Locaticn Address or Lot No. 21 BUTTONWOOD LANE, W. BARNSTABLE Determination for Seasonal High Water Table Method h Used: Depth observed standing in observation hole inches Depth weeping from side of observation hole inches Depth to soil mottles 92 inches (TP-7) Jr;una water adjustment tee index Well Number SDW 252 Reading Date 9/07 Index well level Adjustment factor Adjusted ground water level 2 . 6' nebtn of Naturally Occurring Pervious Material Does at least four feet of naturally occurring perViouS material exist in all areas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? YES If not, what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? HALF OF C2 LAYER OF TP-6 HAS GREATER THAN 4 FEET OF PERMEABLE SOIL (36" - .44" OF C2 LAYER HAS A COMPACTED LAYER MIXED WITHIN PREVENTING 4 FEET OF PERMEABLE C2 LAYER ON THE - NORTHERN SIDE OF TP-6) Cer-ification I certify that on 11/95 (date) I have passed the soil eValuatcr examination approved ov the Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent w-47-n the required training, expertise and exp rience described in 310 CMR 15 . 017 . c 's1a� Signatu e Date FORM 12 - PERCOLATION TEST Location Address or Lot No. 21 BUTTONWOOD LANE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS W. BARNSTABLE Massac:iusetLs Percolation Test Date : 1.0/9/07 Time : 10 :00 observation Hole # PT-6 Depth of Perc 61" - 79" Start Pre-soak 10:05 End Pre-soak 10:20 Time at 12" 10:20 Time at 9 10:41 30 SEC. Time at 6" 11:08 Time ( 9" - 611 ) 26 MIN 30 SEC. Rate Min. /Inch 8 .8 MPI * Minimum of 1 percolation test must be performed i:: both primary area AND reserve area. Site Passed * Site Failed Performed By: DANIEL JOHNSON Witnessed By: DONALD DESMARAIS Comments : * C2 LAYER WAS NOT CONFIRMED TO COMPLY WITH 310 CMR 15 .104, PER BOARD OF HEALTH i �� - 66 Qj a i uZ 3 P' �r-b,A Ct.= 3�,6rift � G D i oEZKe? \ r� oN n of Barnstable �P,�\ 'T Regulatory Services ft � i �E3.ARY5I'ARLE.I MASS. �� Thomas F. Geiler, Director \DO ,639. ,4. AIEonsa� Conservation Division Robert NV. Gatemcood, Administrator 200 NIain Street. Hyannis, NIA 0260.1 E-m:ll,'. '..il`':'.1 I,1I ri' 11 11 Id Office: 506-802,1 9_; Fay:: ;(t :_,7 _24J MEN10 To: Conservation Commissioners From: Roh Gatewood Date: February ?4. N,)06 Re: Patrick Page request for reconsideration Deal- Commissioners. As most of you know by now. correspondence from me is unusual. In this case. I think it's warranted. After discussing with our Chairman. John asked me to put together a background brief on the Page RDA. Let me get to the important points: Y The Commission has long espoused a 'best science' approach to wetlands delineation. enabling consultants to use soil analysis along �xlth florlstics In delineating wetlands • The Commission has long practice of granting an applicant a courteSV reconsideration hearing. where requested following issuance of a DEP superseding order or determination • At the Page hearing of- 11108105. it was abundantly clear that the wetland in question was a difficult one to delineate. given the influence of road runoff and attendant sedimentation • Use of soil information was diSeLlsSed as potentially useful in this case. though not undertaken at the time (it would be used in the DEP appeal) • The fact that not every runoff Swale is regulated as wetland by the Commission was mentioned • The possibility of usin_ the DEP appeal decision as useful evidence in establishing the Article 27 wetland line was articulated • The tenor of the hearing was much more 'discovery' than 'dispute For all of these reasons. it was surprising to see the Commission not grant the request for reconsiceration. To have it hang on a 3-3 rote only made it worse. Consenting to the request would have in no way tied the Commission's hands in (or sealed its fate of) the eventual hCarin to be held. Rather. I think it would have been the fair and routine �\av to deal with it. The 3- vote begs it being re-requested later this -,prim; when the Board has all hands on deck. Gut I'm hoping we don't wait that Ion�,- �\ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 20 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, LAKEVILLE, MA 02347 508-946-2700 MITT ROMNEY STEPHEN R.PRITCHARD Governor Secretary KERRY HEALEY ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor L����. Commissioner 0 u l Patrick Page RE: BARNSTABLE—Wetlands 1780 Main Street Superseding Determination Route 6A of Applicability— 1780 Main St. West Barnstable, Massachusetts 02668 & 21 Buttonwood Lane Dear Mr. Page: Following an in depth review of the above referenced file and an on site inspection of the project location, and in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws,Chapter 131, Section 40,the Department of Environmental Protection is issuing the enclosed Superseding Determination of Applicability(SDA). The Request for Determination of Applicability was filed to confirm the delineation of the boundary of a bordering vegetated wetland (BVW) at the above referenced locations. After reviewing the information contained in the file, conducting an on-site inspection and evaluating the additional soils information submitted on January 25, 2006 by Norman Hayes of the BSC Group, the Department has determined that the delineation(WF#1 to WF #13) shown on the plan of record is accurate. In the opinion of the Department, the reasons given here are sufficient to justify this SDA. However, the Department reserves the right, should there be further proceedings in this matter, to raise additional issues and present further evidence as may be appropriate. If you have any questions regarding the Department's determination in this matter,please contact Daniel F. Gilmore at(508)946-2808. Very truly yours, Tena J. Davies Bureau of Resource Protection D/dfg Enclosure CERTIFIED MAIL# 7001 1940 0005 3102 8058 This information is available in alternate format.Call Donald ht.Comes,ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057.TDD Sen ice-1-800-298-2207. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.mass.gov/dep t�1 Printed on Recycled Paper 2 cc: Barnstable Conservation Commission Norman W. Hayes, PWS BSC Group 384 Washington Street Norwell, MA 02061 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ',. Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands � WPA Form 2 — Superseding Determination of Applicability r,'�, Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 L_ A. General Information From: Department of Environmental Protection Issuing Authority To: Applicant Property Owner(if different from applicant): Patrick Page JDS Realty Trust&J.D Saunders Name Name 1780 Main Street, Route 6A 1780 Main Street, Route 6A Mailing Address Mailing Address West Barnstable MA 02668 _ _ West Barnstable MA 02668 City/Town State Zip Code City/Town State Zip Code 1. Title and Date (or Revised Date if applicable)of Final Plans and Other Documents: Plan of Land to Accompany Request for Determination of Applicability (RDA) October 6, 2005, 21 Buttonwood Lane in West Barnstable, Massachusetts Revised 1/23/06 Title Date Title Date 2. Date Request Filed: October 14, 2005 B. Determination Pursuant to the authority of M.G.L. c. 131, §40, the Department considered your Request for Determination of Applicability,with its supporting documentation, and made the following Determination. Project Description (if applicable): Confirmation of bordering vegetated wetland boundary delineation. Project Location: 1780 Main Street& 21 Buttonwood Lane West Barnstable Street Address City/Town 217 Parcels 4 & 31 Assessors Map/Plat Number Parcel/Lot Number Page 1 of 6 wpaform2.doc•Appendix E Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection `°, Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 2 — Superseding Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B..Determination (cont.) The following Determinations) is/are applicable to the proposed site and/or project relative to the Wetlands Protection Act and regulations: Positive Determination Note: No work within the jurisdiction of the Wetlands Protection Act may proceed until a final Order of Conditions (issued following submittal of a Notice of Intent or Abbreviated Notice of Intent) has been received from the issuing authority(i.e., Conservation Commission or the Department of Environmental Protection). ® 1. The area described on the referenced plan(s)is an area subject to protection under the Act. . Removing,filling, dredging, or altering of the area requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. ® 2a. The boundary delineations of the following resource areas described on the referenced plan(s) are confirmed as accurate. Therefore, the resource area boundaries confirmed in this Determination are binding as to all decisions rendered pursuant to the Wetlands Protection Act and its regulations regarding such boundaries for as long as this Determination is valid. Bordering Vegetated Wetland -Wetland Flags WF#1 through WF#13 are confirmed. ❑ 2b. The boundaries of resource areas listed below are not confirmed by this Determination, regardless of whether such boundaries are contained on the plans attached to this Determination or to the Request for Determination. ❑ 3. The work described on referenced plan(s)and document(s) is within an area subject to protection under the Act and will remove, fill, dredge, or alter that area. Therefore, said work requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. ❑ 4. The work described on referenced plan(s) and document(s) is within the Buffer Zone and will alter an Area subject to protection under the Act. Therefore, said work requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. ❑ 5. The area and/or work described on referenced plan(s) and document(s) is subject to review and approval by: Name of Municipality Pursuant to the following municipal wetland ordinance or bylaw: Name Ordinance or Bylaw Citation ❑ 6.The following area and/or work, if any, is subject to a municipal ordinance or bylaw but not subject to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act: wpaform2.doc•Appendix E Page 2 of 6 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection LlBureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 2 — Superseding Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, 400 B. Determination (cont.) ❑ 7. If a Notice of Intent is filed for the work in the Riverfront Area described on referenced plan(s) and document(s), which includes all or part of the work described in the Request, the applicant must consider the following alternatives. (Refer to the wetland regulations at 10.58(4)c. for more information about the scope of alternatives requirements): ❑ Alternatives limited to the lot on which the project is located. ❑ Alternatives limited to the lot on which the project is located, the subdivided lots, and any adjacent lots formerly or presently owned by the same owner. ❑ Alternatives limited to the original parcel on which the project is located, the subdivided parcels, any adjacent parcels, and any other land which can reasonably be obtained within the municipality. ❑ Alternatives extend to any sites which can reasonably be obtained within the appropriate region of the state. Negative Determination Note: No further action under the Wetlands Protection Act is required by the applicant. Work may proceed at the owner's risk even if a request for an adjudicatory hearing has been made. Requirements for requests for adjudicatory hearings are listed at the end of this document. ❑ 1. The area described in the Request is not an area subject to protection under the Act or the Buffer Zone. ❑ 2. The work described in the Request is within an area subject to protection under the Act, but will not remove, fill, dredge, or alter that area. Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. ❑ '3. The work described in the Request is within the Buffer Zone, as defined in the regulations, but will not alter an Area subject to protection under the Act. Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent. ❑ 4.The work described in the Request is not within an Area subject to protection under the Act (including the Buffer Zone). Therefore, said work does not require the filing of a Notice of Intent, unless,arid until said work alters an Area subject to protection under the Act. 5. The area described in the Request is subject to protection under the Act. Since the work described therein meets the requirements for the following exemption, as specified in the Act and the regulations, no Notice of Intent is required: Exempt Activity(site applicable statuatory/regulatory provisions) 6. The area and/or work described in the Request is not subject to review and approval by: Name of Municipality Pursuant to a municipal wetlands ordinance or bylaw. Name Ordinance or Bylaw Citation wpaform2.doc•Appendix E A Page 3 of 6 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 2 — Superseding Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 C. Authorization This Determination is issued to the applicant and delivered as follows: ❑ by hand delivery on ® by certified mail, 7001 1940 0005 3102 8058 on 0 Q 2006 Date Date This Determination is valid for three years from the date of issuance (except Determinations for Vegetation Management Plans which are valid for the duration of the Plan). This Determination does not relieve the applicant from complying with all other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. Signature: Tena J. Davles ,p, reau of Resource Protection It�;.� Date Notary Acknowledgment Commonwealth of Massachusetts County of Plymouth On this h of Day Month Year before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared Tena J. Davies Name of Document Signer Proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was/were personally known to me Description of evidence of identification to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that he/she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. Signature of Notary Public(' Printed Name of Notary Public r -t\- BRENDA J. HARPER * 'lotary Public I cs�r �r, .=,alth of Massachusetts My Comm i xpires(Date}:,;:'' xpires 2011 wpaform2.doc•Appendix E Page 4 of 6 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 2 — Superseding Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 D. Appeals For Applications filed BEFORE March 1, 2005: The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Determination, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Determination, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to file a Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Appeal (Notice of Claim)pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30A, sec. 10. Complete adjudicatory appeal applications require the submittal of a Notice of Claim and an Adiudicatory Appeal Fee Transmittal Form. A completed Fee Transmittal Form (available at: http://www.mass.ciov/oaa/feetrans.htm) including an appeal fee payment of$100.00, must be mailed to the DEP Lockbox at: Department of Environmental Protection Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 The Notice of Claim (including a copy of the $100.00 appeal fee payment check and a copy of the Fee Transmittal Form)must be sent by certified mail or be hand delivered to the Department within ten business days after the date of issuance of this Superseding Order or Determination. The Notice of Claim must be addressed to: Case Administrator Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street—2nd Floor Boston, MA 02108 A copy of the Notice of Claim shall, at the same time, be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission, the applicant, and any other parties involved in the proceeding. The Notice of Claim shall clearly and concisely set forth the facts related to the proceeding, the reasons the Superseding Order or Superseding Determination is considered to be inconsistent with 310 CMR 10.00 and does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, §40, and the relief sought through the adjudicatory appeal, including the changes desired in the Superseding Order or Superseding Determination. The Notice of Claim must include a copy of the document subject to the appeal and set forth: the Department Wetlands File Number; the name of the applicant and address of the project; the complete name, address, telephone and telefax (if any) numbers of the party filing the request, and, if represented by counsel, the name, address, telephone and telefax (if any) numbers of the attorney; the names, addresses, telephone and telefax (if any) numbers of all other parties, if known; and a statement that a copy of the request has been sent to the applicant, the conservation commission and each other party or representative of such party, if known. In addition, any person filing a Notice of Claim must also set forth sufficient facts to demonstrate their status as a person aggrieved, an abutter, or a ten residents group. Failure to submit all necessary information may result in a dismissal by the Department of the Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Hearing. Any ten persons may intervene in an adjudicatory proceeding pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30A, s. 10A. wpa(orm2.doc•Appendix E Page 5 of 6 k Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection L Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 2 — Superseding Determination of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 For Applications filed AFTER March 1, 2005: The applicant or landowner, the conservation commission, any person aggrieved by this Superseding Order or Determination if previously a participant in the permit proceedings, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Superseding Order or Determination if previously a participant in the permit proceedings, or any ten residents of the city or town where the land is located, if any one resident was previously a participant in the permit proceedings, are hereby notified of their right to file a Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Appeal (Notice of Claim) pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30A, sec. 10. Previous participation in the Superseding Order or Determination permit proceedings means the submission of written information to the Conservation Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, filing a Request For A Superseding Order or Determination with the Department, or providing written information to the Department prior to issuance of a Superseding Order or Determination. The Notice of Claim (including a copy of the $100.00 appeal fee payment check and a copy of the Fee Transmittal Form) must be sent by certified mail or be hand delivered to the Department within ten business days after the date of issuance of this Superseding Order or Determination. The Notice of Claim must be addressed to: Case Administrator Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street—2nd Floor Boston, MA 02108 A copy of the Notice of Claim shall, at the same time, be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission, the applicant, and any other parties involved in the proceeding. The Notice of Claim shall clearly and concisely set forth the facts related to the proceeding, the reasons the Superseding Order or Superseding Determination is considered to be inconsistent with 310 CMR 10.00 and does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, §40, and the relief sought through the adjudicatory appeal, including the changes desired in the Superseding Order or Superseding Determination. The Notice of Claim must include a copy of the document subject to the appeal and set forth: the Department Wetlands File Number; the name of the applicant and address of the project; the complete name, address, telephone and telefax (if any) numbers of the party filing the request, and, if represented by counsel, the name, address, telephone and telefax (if any) numbers of the attorney; the names, addresses, telephone and telefax (if any) numbers of all other parties, if known; and a statement that a copy of the request has been sent to the applicant, the conservation commission and each other party or representative of such party, if known. In addition, any person filing a Notice of Claim must also set forth sufficient facts to demonstrate their status as a person aggrieved, an abutter, or a ten residents group, and provide documentation to demonstrate previous participation, where required. Failure to submit all necessary information may result in a dismissal by the Department of the Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Hearing. Any ten persons may intervene in an adjudicatory proceeding pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30A, s. 10A. •w aform2.doc Appendix E Page 6 of 6 P PP 9 Town of Barnstable P# Department of Regulatory Services Public Health Division Date i639. ♦ - 200 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 Date Scheduled 10)ij 10-7 Time Fee Pd. S it 'tability Assessment for Sewage Disposal B : Witnessed By: . Performed y . LOCATION& GENERAL INFORMATION Location Address . L) 6�7-�0v i 0 0 0 t.� Owner's Name �J�T-n.�4fC Address Assessor's Map/Pqrcel: � En ineer'sName � �eL NEW CONSTRut-r'ION REPAIR Telephone# a'Z e o Land Use Slopes(40) Surface Stones Distances from: Open Water Body ft Possible Wet.Area ®O ft Drinking Water Well ft Drainage Way ft Property Line ft Other ft SKETCH:(Street name,dimensions of lot,exact locations of test holes&pert tests,locate wetlands in proximity to holes) ti L- 31 i o o ' � pT6A 6Per_(_ rest oAt LV6 GA, L'•� �A'/N S 7' C/t•I' �vQ) Parent material(geologic) Depth to Bedrock Depth to Groundwater. Standing Water in Hole: Weeping from Pit Face Estimated Seasonal.High Groundwater DUTERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE Method Used: ln. g in. Depth tG 5011 mottl0s: Depth C)65erved standing in obs.hole: p Depth toweeping from side of obs.hole: in. Groundwater Adjustment fr Index Well# Reading Date Index Well level Adj.factor_ Adj.Grtlundwdter LeVOI.. PERCOLATION TEST Date/® 07 .TI., /�:®o Observation P r-6A ! Time at 9" -_- Hole# ' Depth of Perc -:20 'N Time at G" a..�-- r, a � Start Pre-soak Time:@ JL`0 0'S 'Time(9"-6") ...._ -�',f�PPGdD P�/LLTLST O�Lr 7� (r-t''� End Pre-soak /O-,`°Z3 �^t7—f�-FBKC� �Pv ' l=41 1,�j1 Rate Mn/Inch �Ft L(Z'�t i L++/�r��-!K(Y Site Suitability Assessment: Site Passed Site Failed: Additional Testing Needed(Y/N) Original: Public Hehlth Division Observation Hole Data To Be Completed on Bac -------- N � 1vz'k-e 7-1�^^ T° 4 Gt"4'4rrA._.jCTir &je" weiu. AWAITS)- ***If percolaf on test is to be conducted within 100'of wetland,you must first notify the Barnstable 6iiservation Division at least one(I)week prior to beginning. Q:4S EPTKAPERCF�RM.DOC 1 DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture .Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. onsisten ravel I DEEP OBSERVATION BOLE LOG. Hole# Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. Consistency,%Gravel i DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. Consistenc Gravel DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. Consistency, ra el Flood Insuranke Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary No.— Yes Within 500 year boundary No— Yes es Within 100 year flood boundary No Yes. . Depth of Natutall-v Occurring Pervious Material Does at least fo r feet of naturally occurring pervious mat ial exist in all areas observed throughout the 15S area proposed for the soil absorption system? J Ce <,� t u 723 a"l 1 o/j 910 ) If not,what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? ..� Certification I certify that on. !� .`�� (date)I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required tr i'm expe experience described in 310 CMR 15.017. Signature Date Qa.SEMC1PERCFORMMOC Town of Barnstable P# Z0_7 Department of Regulatory Services MOM: Public Health Division Date +639 e$ 200 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 �tED MA'ta ® �J • Date Scheduled % / Time Fee Pd. Foil' u' bility Assessment for S4, age Disposal Performed By: Witnessed By: L CATION &GENERAL INFORMATION Location Address .� L �n Owner's Name t08 Address 7' !78a rAf Assessor's Map/Pucel: a1 2 0 3 / Engineer's Name'' �I NEW CONSTRUfG`i'ION REPAIR Telephone# Land Use Slopes(go) Surface Stones Distances from: Open Water Body ft Possible Wet,Area 0o t ft 'Drinking Water Well _--fit Drainage Way ft. Property Line ft Other ft • „I CZ-1 SKETCH:(Street name,dimensions of lot,exact locations of test holes&pert tests,locate wetlands in proximity to holes) i �.--, .'r•. . ' ... ® 79 rL . 31 �mmE r C 41: Q O C V-6 E�- 31.6 ° F 6M C �ir l�Pa, InAlty Sr (-i?- -6 4) - Parent material(geologic) Depth to Bedrock /A Depth to Groundwater. Standing Water in Hole: Weeping from Pit Face Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater D ,TERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE Method Used: In, Depth CJbserved standing in obs.hole: _in. Depth t0 Soll trial@V _ Depth tomeeping from side of qhs.hole: in. Groundwater Adjustment fr. s _ A .factor _.Adj.Groundwater Level.fir 6 Index Well Reading Date O7 Index Well level -- d) j b ens c.�,l��PERCOI°ATI�N TEST Date fo 9 o>Time Observation' ,G Time at 9l' /D 4 Hole# P � Time at 6" . Depth of Perc � Start Pre-soak I ime.@ �o' -- End Pre-soak Rate Min./Inch /� Site Suitability Assessment: Site Passed �/ Site Failed; Additional Testing Needed(YM) - N�gO Av��Teca.�t.4G seit-G lT�^(��fi:L Soil —D�r-�4 orJ /0I 1tto�� Original: Public He$lth Division Observation Hole Data To Be Completed on Back-------- ***If percolation test is to be conducted within 100' of wetland,you must first notify the Barnstable C44servation Division at least one(1)week prior to beginning. Q:\SEPTICIPERCF�RM.DOC -DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole#6_ Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling. (Strue re,Stones,Boulders. Consistenc %Gravelh © ' A$" 4 6 C,e j o !014- � ag,-;9 v+ Fs 1 4 -6 8 xZjGe-Fi.4M TP /10 AS�6 �sL� DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG. Hole# 7 Depth.from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. Consistency,%Ora el s'3 6 6 y G) e,&4V L04-mot .sy 61A �Ce.va na"-; X6" C4 r/47 5�+t%tb dteyeD QtE DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. Consistency, Gravel ti DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. onsisten ra el O Flood Insuranke Rate Man: U Above 5JD0 year flood boundary No _ Yes Within 500 year boundary No— Yes Within 100 year flood boundary No Yes Depth of Natulaallv Occurring Pervious Material ' Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist in all areas observed throughout the area proposed fbr the soil absorption system? Y 7 If not,what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? Tf-• C Gz 4.+q3; 'r-A 00- Certification I certify that on. fl Y (date)I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of}environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by ride consistent with the required tra ms expertise a d experience described in 310 CMR 15.017. Signature Date /® 07 Q:1SE1'ncvERCFbRM.DOC Town of Barnstable P# of TME Department of Regulatory Services �*'�/,�16o Public Health Division Date KAM w$ 200 Main Street,Hyannis MA 02601 t6Jp. RFD IA►�F A_;Ao__7__ �Date Scheduled Time Fee Pd. Soil u' bility Assessment for S age Disposal Performed By: Witnessed By: L CATION & ENERAL INFORMATION Location Address / .� Owner's NameP t Address Addr 17 8 o v S ` Engineer's Name Q _�' ay` Assessor's Map/Parcel: L4/ 2 NEW CON Telephone# Land Use Slopes(96) Surface Stones Distances from: Open Water Body ft Possible Wet Area Od t ft Drinking Water Well ft Drainage Way ft. Property Line ft Other ft SKETCH:(street name,dimensions of lot,exact locations of test holes&perc tests,locate wetlands in proximity to holes) .4L — 3i f I 9 n Pr-6 3 rp ) b z 31.b f' g/y► EL = .i'S�7 3 -;Z3.9 f A Depth to Bedrock Parent material(geologic) Depth to Groundwger. Standing Water in Hole: Weeping from Pit Face Estimated Seasonal"igh Groundwater DitTERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE Method Used: Depth to Soil mottles: In. In. D Depth obperved standing in obs.hole: in, Oept I aler Adjustment Depth toiweeping from side of o .hole: Adj.factor....._.-.r Ail.draundwater Level,i�. Index Well A Reading Date: O! index Well level — PERCOLATION TEST' watt �° � cJxlctte %�:co Observation !0 4 1 1 o 0-4 r Time at 9' -- Hole# Depth of Perc h � Time at G• -- -- Tiime(9"-6'7 1�MW �oIr60 Start Pre-soak Time @ - End Pre-soak Rate Min./Inch V Failed: Additional Testing Needed(Y/N) �e Site SuitabilityAssessttient Site Passed Site rUN�4G � T7o7Ti�l� /�� Sfltt. 1t—p�4T-4 014 m Original: Public He$lth Division Observation Hole Data To Be Completed on Back ***If percolafiion test is to be conducted within 100' of wetland,you must first notify the Barnstable Cdgservation Division at least one (1)week prior to beginning. p:\sr..-nr.,PRRCF�RM.DOC DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# 6 Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Strut re,Stones,Boulders. 4 Consisto o -fit " F�cc- CS.4�ro ri A 6 fS1 -/�46cd ,ze°- 39. ;N Fs� �t, iti Slb j�Kr.tdtC b e y L -(CAM 1. 3 CL'-Fit M Logy 11"JAC 6e, -its G� /-ea, f a . r-x ii.2'- 06 G3 c4A-1 4a.4on .$ y 413 Frr< A, 1�6 ,z3.�r G o, /o yard tS F roc e DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG. Hole# 7 Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. 0-10 53 6 6 �- G[�1l Loaf-'^ A 51 617. ja Aj" y =vr�lL�-Lwaft£ Q2."-!61~ (,fj P��o w Ca,t yo lr�t..a.�� �itr.t�i..E • S,+^Ib &4eyL-o DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. Consistency.%D v 'DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Hole# Depth from Soil Horizon Soil Texture 'Soil Color Soil Other Surface(in.) (USDA) (Munsell) Mottling (Structure,Stones,Boulders. o . Flood Insurance Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary No_ Yes . Within 500 year boundary No— Yes Within 100year iloW- boundary No____ Yes Depth of Natutally Occurrin Pervious Material Does at least fo r feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist in all areas observed throughout the area proposed f6r the soil absorption system? If not,what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? TP" G rt) f = 'Certification I certify that on. I (date)I have passed the soil evaluator examination approved by the Department of Environmental Protection and that the above analysis was performed by me consistent with the required tra -ijW,expertise a d experience described in 310 CMR 15.017. Signature Date /� o 7 Q:1SEFnCVERCMRM.DOC i � I J G PAY (�/ � 4 JJ VI) Domestic Septic Design, Inc. Phone & Fax: 508 P.O. Box 831 Osterville, MA 02655 y.A Daniel B.]ohnson,R.S.,C.S.E. President Septic Designs Certified Title V Inspector Title V Inspections Registered Sanitarian Soil/Percolation Tests Certified Soil Evaluator Over 15 Years E erienc -- �. . �,•`� .ems-���, ,� rr� � � u Ca 00,n n't -- — �� 1 �n use_ JUN-14-2006 WED 10:33 AM BSC GROUP YARMOUTH FAX NO. 5087788966 P. 01 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET BSC TO: `%�►ow�s !���C�4 FAX: _roe-7yo - FROM: M*W e- Dr�e3 DATE: 6l16 TIME: 657 West in Street, Unit Is Ya9rmouth, MA 02673 # OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): TEL (608)778-891 9 FAX(508)778-8966 CONTENTS: Surveyors,Engineers %1 s V;'�n and Environmental Consultants MESSAGE: CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the entity to which it is addressed and may contain Information that is privileged,con to the Intfidentialended or e is not the intended exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this messag message recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying a communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received th of this is commun notify us immediately by telephone and return the original m cation in error,please essage to i at the address please above via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. JUN-14-2006 WED 10:34 AM BSC GROUP YARMOUTH FAX NO. 5087788966 P. 02 BSC GRoup / providing solutions that create value 657 Main Street Unit 6 Route 28 - West Yarmouth June 14, 2006 MA o2673 Town of Barnstable—Board of.Health Tel: 5o87778-8919 Attn: Thomas McKean 800-288-8123Fax:50&778-eg66 200 Main Street Hyannis,MA 02601 www.bscgroup.com RE: 21 Buttonwood Lane, West Barnstable, MA CANCELLATION of a De-Watered Percolation Second Notice Dear Members of the Board, The purpose of this letter is to notify the Board and Department that the dewatered percolation testing for the above referenced site has been put on hold and at this time we are not seeking to reschedule. The Mass. Highway department is currently doing some repair work on the drainage systems in the area and the continued wet weather has created adverse site conditions at the current time. Please give me a call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Mark D. Dibb,P.E. The BSC Group, Inc. Engineers Environmental Scientists GIS Consultants Landscape Architects Planners Surveyors c� COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 UV MITT ROMNEY STEPHEN R.PRITCHARD Governor Secretary KERRY HEALEY ROBERT W.GOLLEDGE,Jr. Lieutenant Governor Commissioner TITLE 5 ALTERNATIVE TO PERCOLATION TESTING GUIDANCE FOR SYSTEM UPGRADES Effective Date: May 3, 2006 Program Applicability: BRP/DWM/Watershed Permitting/Title 5 Program Supersedes Policy#: BRP/DWM/PeP-P00-1, dated January 7, 2000 Regulation Reference: 310 CMR 15.104/ 310 CMR 15.405(1)(i) Approved by Purpose: This document contains the Title 5 Program's guidance for reviewing applications for Local Upgrade Approvals which propose use of sieve analysis in substitution of the percolation testing requirements of Title 5 for the upgrade of on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems. Applicability: This guidance applies to applications for Local Upgrade Approval for system , upgrades where percolation testing in accordance with Title 5 cannot be performed. The alternative to percolation testing set forth in this guidance may be used, when percolation testing is not possible due to high groundwater and the applicant seeks to proceed with a system upgrade,rather than wait for groundwater to recede to perform percolation tests. The alternative outlined in this guidance may be used only for the repair or upgrade of an existing system when no increase in design flow is proposed. This alternative is an option for Board of Health consideration under Local Upgrade Approvals at 310 CMR 15.405. Title 5, 310 CMR 15.104, requires percolation testing as part of the site evaluation for a new system or a system upgrade. Since the standards for new construction are more stringent than those for system upgrades, the alternative described in this guidance does not apply to cases of new construction, or increases in existing design flow. This information is available in alternate format.Call Donald M.Gomes,ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057.TDD Service-1-800-298-2207. MassDEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.mass.gov/dep 1 ��a Printed on Recycled Paper Title 5 requires percolation testing to be performed in the most restrictive soil layer of the naturally occurring pervious material beneath a proposed soil absorption system (SAS). The Department recognizes that at certain times, however, high groundwater conditions preclude performance of standard percolation tests. During such times, the applicant may choose to perform dewatered percolation testing. Provided that an immediate upgrade is not being required by the local approving authority or DEP, or the upgrade timelines in 310 CMR 15.305, if applicable, would not be violated, the applicant also may wait until groundwater has receded and standard percolation testing can be performed. Alternatively, in accordance with this guidance, the applicant may proceed with a sieve analysis if the local Approving Authority determines a percolation test cannot be performed. Dewatered percolation testing involves lowering the groundwater table to a point where testing can be performed in accordance with Title 5. Since dewatered percolation testing frequently is difficult and, in many cases, infeasible, attempting dewatered percolation testing is not a prerequisite prior to applying for use of a sieve analysis under this guidance. Impervious & extremely low permeability soils In cases of impervious soils or soils with extremely low permeability, the alternatives set forth in this guidance are not appropriate as such soils simply cannot support an on-site system. Where the Soil Evaluator, the local approving authority, or DEP determines that the soils are impervious or of extremely low permeability, for example, due to the presence of ledge, greater than 40%clay, or highly compacted till, and there is no feasible alternative(e.g. a shared system), then a tight tank to eliminate a failed system, approved under 310 CMR 15.260,would be the only option. Requirements for obtaining local upgrade approval for sieve analysis use and relief from the percolation testing provisions When an applicant proposes to upgrade a system, percolation testing cannot be performed due to high groundwater and the soils are neither impervious nor of extremely low permeability, the Approving Authority may approve/allow a sieve analysis in substitute of the Title 5 percolation testing requirements. In addition to complying with the other requirements of Title 5, the sieve analysis and local upgrade approval application to the local approving authority must contain the following: 1. documentation of a demonstration that percolation testing cannot be performed; 2. the Soil Evaluator's determination, along with the written concurrence of the local approving authority, of whether the soils are uncompacted or compacted; 3. results of performance of a Particle Size Analysis by a soils laboratory; 4. the Soil Evaluator's determination of the soil type, which must be based on the Particle Size Analysis and the USDA Soil Textural Triangle in Title 5; and 5. the Soil Evaluator's determination of the soil class under 310 CMR 15.243,which must be based on the soil type; and 6. plans for a system upgrade designed in accordance with the criteria in this policy for the soil type, class and determination of soil compaction. 1) Demonstration that percolation testing cannot be performed Percolation testing must be attempted in the presence of the local approving authority, or its authorized representative, and determined not to be possible due to high groundwater. 2) Determination of compacted vs. uncompacted soils Without the benefit of percolation testing, more reliance is placed on the determination of soil compaction. Since compacted soils can be extremely firm in place, but friable when removed for a sample, the Soil Evaluator must make an in-situ determination of the soil structure and consistence. The Soil Evaluator, with the written concurrence of the local approving authority, must determine whether the soils in the area of the proposed SAS are compacted or uncompacted. The Soil Evaluator must use the techniques described in Appendix 1. For uncompacted soils, the Soil Evaluator can use the results of the particle size analysis to determine the soil type and class, and, subsequently, the effluent loading rate. In compacted soils, such as dense, compact till, the compacted nature of the material results in a significant . decrease in the amount of pore space necessary for groundwater flow and particle size analysis results alone are inadequate for determining an effluent loading rate. 3) Particle Size Analysis In the presence of the local approving authority or its authorized representative, the Soil Evaluator must obtain a soil sample from the most restrictive layer of the four feet of naturally occurring pervious material for the particle size analysis. Although for purposes of obtaining an effluent loading rate, the particle size analysis is considerably more useful in the case of uncompacted soils, the analysis still is useful to characterize compacted soils, particularly where the soils have a high percentage of clay. The particle size analysis, performed by a qualified soils laboratory, must be used to determine the percentages of sand, silt and clay in the soil sample. The analysis must be performed for both compacted and uncompacted soils. The particle size analysis must be performed in accordance with Appendix 2. 4) Determination of soil type Once the relative percentages of sand, silt and clay have been determined through particle size analysis, the Soil Evaluator must use the USDA Soil Textural Triangle in 310 CMR 15.243(2) to determine the soil type. 5) Determination of soil class Based on the soil type, the Soil Evaluator must classify the soil into one of the four soil textural classes described in 310 CMR 15.243 (1). 6) Design Criteria— uncompacted vs. compacted soils a) For uncompacted Class I and uncompacted Class II soils, the results of the particle size analysis, the soil type and the soil classification must be used to determine the effluent loading rate based on the effluent loading rate table,below. The system upgrade must be designed with that effluent loading rate and the requirements of Title 5. b) For compacted soils and all Class III and all Class IV soils the design criteria, set forth below, must be used to design the system upgrade. Where the soils are compacted or Class III or Class IV soils, extremely low permeability could limit the soils' ability to adequately accept a subsurface discharge. These systems, therefore, must have a conservative design, intended both to allow an on-site discharge and prevent breakout. In addition to meeting Title 5 requirements, the design criteria for a system upgrade in compacted soils and in Class III and Class IV soils are as follows: 1. in accordance with the Effluent Loading Rate table,below, the effluent loading rate is limited to 0.15 gallons per day(gpd)per square foot (sf); 2. pressure distribution is required; 3. a four foot vertical separation to high groundwater elevation, or a five separation in soils greater than 85% sand. Where the required separation to the high groundwater elevation will not be met, an Innovative/Alternative (I/A) treatment technology approved by DEP for Remedial Use is required and the local approving authority and DEP may approve a reduction down to a minimum of a two foot separation to high groundwater elevation, or a three foot separation in soils that are greater than 85% sand; 4. where feasible, four feet of naturally occurring pervious material. Where there are not four feet of naturally occurring pervious material, the applicant must satisfy the requirements of 310 CMR 15.415 for the siting of a system upgrade with less than four feet of naturally occurring pervious material and an I/A treatment technology approved by DEP for Remedial Use is required. In such cases, the local approving authority and DEP may approve a reduction to a minimum of two feet of naturally occurring pervious material; 5. where feasible, a fully sized SAS. Where a fully sized SAS is not feasible, then an I/A treatment technology approved by DEP for Remedial Use is required and the local approving authority and DEP may approve a reduction of up to 50%in the required SAS size; 6. a modified septic tank is required where there will be a reduction in the required four or five foot separation to high groundwater elevation, or a reduction in the required four feet of naturally occurring pervious material, or a reduction in the required SAS size. The modified septic tank shall have a valve located in the septic tank discharge pipe so that in the event of breakout or other hydraulic failure, the discharge pipe valve could be closed and sealed and the discharge pipe beyond the valve removed, converting the septic tank to a tight tank. If converted to a tight tank, the volume of the septic tank,together with that of the pump chamber, may be used to meet the requirements for tight tank size in 310 CMR 15.260(2)(a); 7. a condition that prohibits any increase in design flow and requires a notice, recorded with the deed, that both prohibits any increase in design flow and references the Approving Authority's approval letter of the Local Upgrade Approval. The local approving authority may approve an I/A system with one reduction criterion (# 3, #4 or 45, as described above), but not more than one. A system upgrade requiring more than one reduction would require local approving authority and then DEP approval under BRPWP64c - approval of an alternative system for remedial use. Such applications to DEP should be submitted to the appropriate DEP regional office. A system designed for compacted soils or Class III or Class IV soils,without the benefit of percolation testing, is a high risk option; it does not guarantee that sewage breakout or backup will not occur. Accordingly, any local upgrade approval letter issued under this guidance for such a system must provide that should the system fail,the system owner shall immediately notify the Board of Health and the Department, in writing, and then proceed with an appropriate upgrade. Additionally, approval letters for systems designed under this guidance an I/A treatment technology and a reduction in the required separation to high groundwater,the depth of naturally occurring pervious material or the SAS size, should contain a condition requiring the system owner to: a) by 45 days of a system failure, submit for approval a tight tank application in accordance with 310 CMR 15.260; b)by 14 days of issuance of the Department's tight tank approval,apply for a Disposal System Construction Permit from the local approving authority; and c)by 14 days of issuance of the permit, complete conversion of the system to or installation of the tight tank. Following any system failure,the Department and the local approving authority may require such r interim measures as they deem appropriate. E Effluent Loading Rates for systems designed and approved under this guidance Soil Type Uncompacted All compacted soils and Class I and Class I1 Soils' all Class III and all Class IV Soils Class I > 85% sand 0.74 gpd/sf 70— 85% sand 0.66 gpd/sf 0.15 gpd/sf Class I1 0.33 gpd/sf F 1 The system must be designed based on the applicable effluent loading rate in this table and the requirements of Title 5. 2 The system must be designed based on a 0.15 gpd/sf loading rate,the design criteria on page 4 of this guidance, and the requirements of Title 5. APPENDIX 1 On-site investigation techniques to determine if soils are compacted (compact till): • Note the ease or difficulty of excavation by the backhoe (does the excavator experience difficulty digging, does the bucket chatter across the surface of the material making shallow cuts with each pass—these soils may be compacted). • Pick at the side of a test hole with a knife or hand tool to feel for the ease or difficulty of penetration(difficulty would suggest compacted material). • Note the presence of angular shaped rock fragments (suggests compacted till). • Note the speed at which groundwater weeps into the pit ( groundwater weeping slowly into the pit would suggest dense, compacted material). • Note the consistency of undisturbed soil clod(squeeze the clod of soil between your thumb and index finger; initially compact till will resist crushing and then with increased pressure will rupture suddenly). The consistency of soil in compacted material will be firm, whereas in uncompacted material, the consistency will be loose or friable. • Note the soil saturation (compacted soils will appear moist, not saturated, due to the lack of pore space). Adapted from the DEP approved Title 5 Soil Evaluator Course Materials APPENDIX 2 The standard method for Particle Size Analysis is the method of Gee and Bauder(1986) in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Edition , published by the American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America. This method, or another method acceptable to the Department, must be used by the soils laboratory. The soils laboratory must: • determine the relative percentages of sand, silt and clay from the soil sample that passes through a#10 sieve, (which removes aggregate from the sample), • use.a#270 sieve to separate the sand fraction from the remaining combined silt and clay fraction, • establish the relative percentages of silt and clay in the sample by either pipet or hydrometer method. s ';;�.. �.... •+c :s� i r�' ,�.x, _ fly ;,,�;••; f - �+'1'_,,;s .+,..+yam. '� :� ,;� - •..' ". ' .^•. ,Y iM..0 t `x y. gbjj 4$ �" �a`N -WLo A, Q., [_..'(.:, M�•'i Y _ :--��+"^",�+a�C•.a('.. �.3 lye in, _' +kC-'awl ''�`�},��••�`"-w.•. � +� � � >: _�- y ,�.fyy�"R""bu•,..� r_ ' �`�''a""""+��'`.'k•s`�".=�'ti�C,; "�`-'C.-i.:4� .� `�ay`s,�r a,k.�Y ,.A' + _ #�;:,� �'' ':3- r a . "M,,���,� "ate,:.: � f .`c+"�� +AY�.°"..�.. C x' "f '• ��R� �y1 � ram,�` `^+" "� T ♦ d u e: m , •rp `�" ,,.` a sir � � .�,�,.ir r�" M � ,1 , s • `J •pLa"�" T- .:. a i 'fin �.. , �y���_3'",,,'w �' 'h� � ��at �� ��*."`..' r.9f y�. m�". ,.r �'� r _ }�y }�yP >�-,mot•^i'"" '�-V�t �.: 9 , r r q • k� 1 H 7 , pp + 4 u s+ - nr w q?r_fj ks- Al n f ,da...� ...' ,... ?� .� ,it. � �'a'.��g+'' .�Fa�M�� y4:�' '�F.f i,' f��,ati' � 4.t w4` .,,�rj,►. �-•r- '`" ��*.7 ,� ^a'.^. .;�r� .P►: �',�,,� � .�. � fir��'f s �t�..±t" {�.ry�J` s +ram .� �, �� � r•' .1` - ��'� ' '�` � ",� ao. 7 ` �?K >; � ,�,� .� � r.•R s .mow � w.. ` hs `� >�3'�`� r a ; Y # 'T _, � 1 � l �� .r � �� t `� ice. . rk �, a^��'• � + � -. - F x r r �M • F A,.. ..� .. 3 "'� _,."�.I'��.+' _ ��., 4 !,�,�� '` °ter✓'.�'i`y{ a ° ' j'. � . •a.r -1 r�ar. F vjp m I r 4r.. ew:.n T��•. 'y1 s`i. ��. y f?�y. F � �t{= �r4�4;:` , - .' diiTL... .. y� , .i pl •gym • Ll 46,1 •+.�'iF. ry[,1IN, Ct '� •��f y�. _ •�, � y .r AA 04 _ r 't �� M ���',p"R*e t '�`'� 1E s3... � ."'R�t S.� ��" r ,�. � �..a��1�:'�r� ,,` 'qK• t • pit,^ { • � .:.�,..• r�� .•r 'r. ^^ � • r- ,.- ♦ .k _j � � r�.. � � fir'- - {i ry ../I 4- ..,ti wqy ���V, ah,wv,/' •' :1a4. r y« tJ —XI 4, ,t f �• `/,. '. ,J ,rr, �' fi � � y ct • { � Y - 'r✓" ` �,r � �Ai�,y. w,r,.rrM4.�ii'i S � �r*F ,>rt'- .�(�d�' ,l�k � � J j �• ,r. f •; -f , ,�. "' si�"�'• � f �� � •; �•�+/�/'� ' i a ��iRA • ,RiY�,.. ea }' 1 . r '•� * } �." 241OfOF 40 " n q1.i"'t�•..�i ,r F•s+ 4 r } 4'4`.lY�• tea ` s 4 IV�44 kw , 1 Y. y J i rt� yy .. k • ;,M .A . ' r fir. .: _. ..• , C r .. •' TIA S`�' •'�"�e �, •. � X )j �+w�Y �� ��`fir- Y f CDC'J�/ � P a A r '�..,• �_"�y`1,�6 �#}`..' �P�t•!' �} 1 ,,..Ir' � '� 'z• 7��� M.�.:fc• � 1'i.✓ •I� •'ti L� ,L.S7v. ���' r Yr. u 1 � Hr Y• •�� J _+ ",� � �,` �£_ ,fin+ , �' � t «,� *°�"''�`' .�..;�� � r" ` ' `y-{ -r. J«1' •+fit - r '' s � ^ , '- ♦ •f :fly �' `dr•a �Y'�� - .."`'„�, e •'a. ? j AN�^ iap tit yy' i yy r t L7 ` 1 _ A "+e -1 �' �Li y w a ,'. *�Y� .u,�� .°'�[^ R K S���ri .� a'�`t'~ „�� + r..y: �7• tom.`.. .'� ::.,�' '�' �4�� I 1 _ :c d:• -. R -Sr17',+l,r, '1QI'; ,+ 1 VW t: 7L.�YYY,,,,,,Mv, w+�{.+#f'. .( ri1° ya 7�•'- LL, 14. r' �r ! �, :.'y�/�"�n,�F � `. +' ! 4 .- ...;P ti -..v .�a • r.M.�,.�F'}('ry � ,�r y L' � l..�F� y ay, '�_ � j �'' „�k"`'`a •� �♦ sue: � �. '� '�, ♦ .. j �Y , • 1. -u C iG' ra.��,a,• ��: � ti, jw•Y�.-M �., Z w r ' ,u a ,,n T`.�, W� tt,. V.'.'i�'�fi�,�itY'�r�Mi���t`i`µ'�^'4 '!.'f;��� �4 '��. •.v. �; � � • ;,fir +� o ��5 �y. -..��,$ ��y:': i4 " i,',r.�.;,. 4'� ���� _ *'� e a Inrc� ..�•F .'• j ., r, �Y N 1,`T_'TJ. eF s, r."" ._:.+.•tyy+.f� II y w ti n ) r y4e'. till ti i� �` fasV� t• lyy� 'r ., � « ' ! r'!F� .Ilk l�+. � ���� �a1CY' � �': L '►�,. Yp ' ' •t'.' • guy* yr{ `"Ti^. fry«� Ry ,�,y� � sJA ,,� �'�d` �y ,f. �I. A. TT "f 1 �;t�' ..,�.,� I r� •-� ��;r,�,,. `� � i ,`�� ., �.i`jam' '.�e `�+t 9 �p ,� f. ,.r+`t ,►` *"�,.+.r 4'},y'}c���„. �. � �. ,�j;. 7. �/ gyp � �+ � y• ,, • , • mt 1Q -i'" �' _ t .2.. a-y x • { T - �.�..:. .. L 9. ,. A4e. w ,i y "'*� • • "�« ''>t tom, � y� � ai, rr' � y•r $.. l ��•�„�4 r"' ! .� MIRE 'f. '�" ,�. �.A"� r f l„e .. r .�'mil. �Me �, . . a►I��!!.'�,T' 'r� ^'`1y,• (`• � Y �y �"•a'y f: c . 1� > 6-af 14'...J �.i"" .lily, .rvx' ,t',. a _ 'r„ '.s alw•.. M1 •,r;,_ :b .�� _�P ! y r - f!f�. I� `�•'s ✓ t..T�Its. '� +*•�� �S ?•'�� ,a rt� � T � r l -4 yip 4 y •:. , ?�i✓ w�• ! �.''!+V rt ^ ' h. ./ d "- -'t- �.is rT i • Ct'.. � t. • 'yr: t "-E.. �a"�.. Al. !r„ y J/' -w r'y . � s ,. n► ' �t'nei '' r� �, a '+ �-'!".�, i i- ,f. � sfy •Ik � w t �, _ - r c' Jr. `� •i + !r ^•rt,,. � � .�..'...�'�„�J, �"`.r+ �. - !- '•/.I_ .•C « � �f. ' � ,. � � y ' "�ISY' �'f yr .1 y ~ .w,;�,'�•.+ � �-., r w. �A M f, w r !} lam^ rwl'� �:,. ., '_<n �:%"'+1�, Y_ -s..t�. w:� '�y � �...+ t.ry�°,�+� • f�•�.G "� f ,,�� �t k'�` ��� ��.{ �G, ��0.0'$�' t ','+v •, '_*i► i!,�iw��' x.�. '",.fit i d► '1 i r z �• { �` rt , Y f} yyy '>, S +aW ::... , � m R f �i� ��!+�i/��� .i• .. ,•I� ,r, �` .n �"l- 'S„ gym' +� _ C,i• r , wt,Y .-sw '"i.. sr.n . t p!1�-^Yr- ,t•�Jr 4.., ,, i'^_ ,� .v"�� � °^'+0.- .G- ""�M�4r� +, 3�� n _ .. _i �.'•,TS•\`...4._e^. J � �-- ,a .�•�� L�'r°� °*"�a�� « ti a••. �•• �,,,�•�"�`w.'�'`.. i� ` it - :,.i:�v� �'?S /M1 - _ �-.- -.y'�,�rt- I'l+•. n i' i .. fi :.."` �rt«t'...+LutS'w.,,'�; �.`:�` ,r y �:•,� �, � t .iY4 i �.:C;����=;�� -L s''a�r`'E ,' .�', ^• +x 1 +k"y4 c r: ki 4 s�`t`"Qyr'ay ..`.f i *- ` AV fa, r JL ,Y e. w .• c � ,�:- '� 1., y, _ � xis +�� - ..P•• � ��,.. � _-h. �� �Y rr,,�� �� �� V��A c"• L' ate_ T +S.'� � Kr3•'y'F'k^ 3�„ ._. • s W H !! • M ', �-. a ..-.. •.5.. •! .q - W. �: 't•' y £, gam',�w.Ig. ..t `' - ,�,• f w�', ,,;. ,��tr��. x.r�' �� a ..rnr x �LT•^� �.r g t�. e iio I 4•� � r � �„ . .. vas Y 3"wlyr `�e�•• {��~�;iw�•:+'•f=+' �'> f� � _ n,J � 1� -,-`1 _ ' •�� 4.f�,K•.• '"'�!' ° ., ! - y40 ♦ •ram f't a , 7c' � a r (/j�).///�/ f 2/ � � • may - A 4r. r <.- `., �" •' n.`•� r .,�:is, .:' !,•' _. ✓'•• ..;• i('j ,IP `. z ..4 rA ray;:. �r .,.-.. N.t ... � �..�,,.7T'?,.� ,. ,v+ ~ � �'iPi""�•*r• �i*t �t � 'r1r��. C .,.,.ice +gT .+. .P.+.. ., �S r ��a• ` rwsri--,�" - ✓+s;: !!+„��,�. .• � .:,: .�G'`"�` .s- �' - �t • ►:-a`_Jii:'� �,.1 �+ � < '4°' .+L. �..-7^vs�'i � '�-',F�;�r +,.� �, } �- �' •. t 'i¢• �'.•�i,�. y7�,L�y L F Yd "�+a. � ��� �• w - T t � 1 ` � y�= -"* � '.'"Y';•+r =�`'�� � .ate Y i � � 1 ���"�� �� :�s��'' �r R ° + � 3, " X„f►"`rr-i- ,} ,ypl,f�..,,,,^a•"'3s `��""-. �q n s >gy , ems" WiR `� �T • ,f'"'K�t+� ' ., - •aw � '-"'�*rt� t / ( .'1 w g�-42. G+.. ,• . ." j �ly4�""•�r4'"`Y �' fa, .7i '� 0" to S•ti t k ' 5 i'•`."�r r-�1tv4;"e�7'+�iw„ i-� �� *�Y '�a"� 'YY t '•s`. fir. (� ,'f '✓`B •r Diu,.s-� «;-ry'� ����N' '"..-5._ - ,•+{.F - , { t+i l �j � .fit Y .•4p.��4Y } + .� ,P„�' _ ��. •tea. - ... {� • • r '�r+.� �[.'1 t dry :!� �� � •4*' � �-}'� ! '�{�. .� tr --5:�,"+ SM �.> a�`b''� ice.� r } � � �('• s '�41r b� e.a y, +v , ^p'3r x y -4� �•� ;•.s•u� � � "'� 1 � ry:L..,,t{ �+� 4� .•MJ sl � - � �! ��4?�r.x J, " X;,`�i '-, *Vl, "1.- ...ir_ ` �' � ..t * ��" era ,s:- �. � a- '•'��'' ;'. "'+_ .'� � � � ,1+.. .fit °-Iw� -J �_•.)�3 � if. ��y_ �� �•,+ 1'1. ") `k�"a����.� [ °r ?r.� �•, � ��� ram» � 11� K°t����fY� �� ,.`P�"� ♦-•- +r. .,� as`;'/r-SM „ { } .a ��'- {�� .T*��` J,'' � � F ,c A,,.,� `r,�"....r`,x,���•. "�' - 7 "" =•i...MSY°; e4. •^'" J`-��' � kt< 'r, . �Jr»,s�,'K '+J. .�: t `.:. $' lw. • `• ,�,-,^"`" }^�',, I oil, a - h. ;�`•�.�'I+r c � '�"' ..�•a�. `A' _ 1�'° r 2 3 i �.c�� � �� �-�? l _ y . , ..r s„ Y. r n 4. r a • a ��yet, •. �, sr"+°f. � � �' �R�I Sr a ^ �u .,. fir.• - ..- �, ek .. M. .yg•'� <y' !Y: '( �,.. .,} - ."-- +«� ,,. _• it � �-0 �� t• .., -s ,� ' Ra�,� _ is �"w!$r, ,..,,.. ;•,✓,•ir�' t A t n x C 9 �'. ,. N, ., k � ` 'r`� //J/f ,ae v e '. � .. y^ S:a.. pfL^ , r M� ✓1� �I`w y '� -�'T_'� :' '� At A'r Al. `foyr y - "'`.. ..'+.. ..Yr.:r� ..�. .....�`` � •;. ,..,:.k,�'` :zy K- :f sp 'yr:�� :Fc`✓�i .�+:.�'✓�"s • + r`4 k IV ..r F..{va �. �"�' �-.�'�.> �t 'b '' ,. •�:'..YfA _ � ��. _ ` ����f_I MR`• rw•�r-9����y�� 77"_v-..' "' Vt 4 r I y v Y ,cz � R Y,yc�.w `%+n'�` ''�', � �- # emu. =,'�'"'�e�� "_ �1�...:��rt„���`�'- -��'t.S ""y►P,� #. -- '�'= •, y r^� w T � y ,,�. ��� ` r.: '+".. �..,�#•� .Y "'4 ,-. � x� F_s ��"'*t k?+�i �'>s;rt � \rxs �i;,�„'{,,;.f�;��y r � r�4 T A •�.�i• J'w �fr'�.n-.�,,: ��t Z"'-+Y4 r• 4�.,��`�, y ••j Ali ' r '• v � ',!"a f' � ��r�-- � st 7 �1•,��var�c~ ,4�"� �,���w�e��ti '�+ •��'��� �'� _ • f M1 A - _}�,,�✓..r<9� ,y '�jR�i����'� y f a .Y., � � �� 'i '•C �•R_ .V Z '-��'�`�'1_ +5� 'Y`'�.�y-�'�� j'- i�''�! Y ..s- �^__ �i��' =y�jc��`'�i� `i."�• �`, `rti. t..,,�d,� �i='F`'�'�, '�f'• - � ,.-t. '��► +5..�"r yY=t 7 � �' s""`.'• zit �Tt(''1� ^t¢�� � j, n jK '� �. � ` c .x .,�,•,'� ,��,r,,,�: �~ �'VrRw ;pG.'r�f `� X. s�x��r .,�h'��4' .s ``is f.• ,rGG�f ' c�:.TeT�,S+�'» ���.•.""! .� -:. _.:' �,. -, "F�t �L�� tfi`�'';eoj�R� ♦'•i�1 �v';•� •�;ls.�.,��y{?A'�j "�fi1:. �,I•- ,��P _ `.s4 �, . � l c 4 d _ +a i _ y . yy , .�. s - ems• �, T'.,�» � _ n..�s.'sM y� ^`rJF� � �' ' ++c�.yy��r ��p�,�! 31' •'"'7��1?��'"'� �'�:.F `*.y-�� "'� ,. .t 4, a t r. ' ."q s« 1.'� �` •'. a i Y zv� 'mw-, Ar : "FIN AT r AP�►` � -+•Y - � I ?a�i'�-+ t } y �4 .'..b r y t +R" �S - way .. �� L ; i � s � i � fit.*. ;^L; �,y.r ,n _i it ""� ,�."y� �F\ .-} �•�, ,..� � JR` �' � � ,-^tip*k ��s ',�, E'� .�,`�---« `•�►�w ..�.•r v'v'.��,-:���i,�,M s•1 .�'. .!v ir ., � t �*.}+..0�r y its: r '..r I�W -.. t�. �'-"-.� � ' �♦'���l�..i���, 1°r' ..«�.-�'..+r�" 51't --Iefi hdo d+cl n,4 mee� W�1nPf1e� � �1 No ` nn ,� �� rip e✓' I , .® N �-V, `� i • �r mill I-- • ---- ---- I ail Mft --- - r P 1 � Fill all 4 a� lts I _ fl �� • Y V v ,� p o/'�' 6^ ��2 Sc endue - 1 i { I 1 � I 35 34 1,17-1 0 pac -1�'4 ti I ti ry _ ,; sna. S.i7a" tea. . {Z' ,t„ r - `��T/• �/� lII sp df 3 r � a y"� > rt l q 444 nn ' �`�s Opi HI Ac IAJ ol # e �4 s fb r 1 e 00� f. k. ve I .. i i • �ISTROUTI©N BOX DETAIL: NOT TO SCALE �T f�1T DATA: . XXX SEPTIC TANK ®EVIL. 1 ,50o GALLON LEACHING TI��.NC.hI ©EVIL. NOT TO SCALE SOIL �.� REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION NOT To SCALE NO. OF OUTLETS 5 TEST PIT -#,-- TEST PIT --#2 NOTES: 1. SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE STEEL 5. INLET AND OUTLET TEES TO BE CAST IRON, FINISHED GRADE 36" MAX .COVER REINFORCED CONCRETE. SCHED. 40 PVC OR CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE. GRD. EL. X GRD. EL. X TEES TO BE CENTERED UNDER MANHOLE COVER. REMOVABLE 2" WALLS - FINISHED GRADE EST. HIGH GW. X EST. HIGH GW. X 2. SEPTIC TANK TO WITHSTAND H-10 LOADING COVER I NOTES: UNLESS UNDER PAVEMENT, DRIVES OR 1 LOAM & SEED DISTURBED AREAS TRAVELED WAYS, WHEREIN H-20 LOADING "�''��'�+''��'��''�r �'i''+�'' L py� BARRIER 1• DIST. BOX TO WITHSTAND H-10 LOADING � � _ / SHALL APPLY: -- A� GENERAL NOTES: / X UNLESS UNDER PAVEMENT, DRIVES OR 4 CAP ENDS / xx i XX / HIGH GROUNDWATER COMPUTATION' 3. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS AND CONCRETE 4" PVC---lw; ' '-'-' "--•4 =F 4=C== 0= .�. , 2-24 DIA CONCRETE MANE-TOLES TRAVELED WAYS WHEREIN H-20 LOADINIG CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. o v a o u o o e o l o e a o o u o u 1. THIS PLAN IS FOR DESIGN AND / XX XX W/ METAL HANDLES BROUGHT ` 15" SHALL APPLY. a:1ta? 'b° �°ac+o� o 0 0 o a o e a e o / XX xx (BASED ON TP#X) 4. FILL ALL UNUSED KNOCKOUTS WITH TO 6 OF FINISH GRADE �` s' T �� �� �� nf �,° � o,��.�r4,ae�,�°44� �°• ro,, CONSTRUCTION OF THE SEWAGE xx es• EEcnvE DEPTH DISPOSAL FACILITY ONLY. MORTAR. . TEE TO BE UNDER 6" o a�beOa�eOa o ewe o a o v o a oea oe o v o v oeu o u oea o a o u o a o o �(2. PROVIDE INLET TEE OR BAFFLE WHERE ,'a�t°a� ate° �'Q�° 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND XX / XX •. 5,5" OUTLETS a. a a c � ,��- � � c � a� � a a � a a � a a XX XX DEPTH TO WATER(OR BOT. OF HOLE)_ XX 12" MIN. ' M.H. OPENING COVER SLOPE OF PIPE EXCEEDS 0.08 FT./FT OR XX INDEX WELL XX____ ,I..///\ // �" 'J"� �' ''� -�- LEVEL BOTTOM// " ou `¢% e e �oA a oe a oou ooa IN PUMPED SYSTEM. I- - I 25' D.E PRTITLE 5 AND LOCAL BOARD ASS. 3 ( 2 a gvq ���- ^Qom a a " OF HEALTH REGULATIONS. XX / XX EL = X WATER LEVEL RANGE ZONE _ XX__ � h '�aa `� `6o�`�i �=�,a-'� `�b `b L_ 2 3. FIRST TWO FEET OF PIPE OUT OF DIST. 4" BOTTOM ON LEVEL PROFILE 3. ALL PIPES LOCATED UNDER PAVEMENT / CURRENT DEPTH®INDEX WELL(12/00)_XX-_ RAISE M.H W�.- " j XX SEWER BRICK _ _ 6 MIN. 3 4 BOX TO BE LAID LEVEL. X WATER LEVEL ADJUSTMENT XX 10'-6" - d<_� <__ . . <- � STABLE BASE / TO - 1 1/2" CRUSHED OR TRAVELED WAY SHALL BE SCHEDULE / 10-0 <12" CROSS-SECTION STONE BASE 4. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS AND CONCRETE 40 OR EQUAL. XX DEPTH TO ADJUSTED HIGH WATER XX " & MORTAR NORMAL WATER LEVEL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. 36 MAX. - 12 MIN. COVER 4. THERE ARE NO KNOWN PRIVATE WELLS EL = X r 3" - 5. FILL ALL UNUSED KNOCKOUTS WITH MORTAR. 2% MIN. FINISH GRADE 4" MIN. LOAM & SEED LOCATED WITHIN 150 FT. OF THE XX i PRECAST SEPTIC TANK 10" 14" / / PROPOSED LEACHING FACILITY NOR INLET TEE - 5'-1" T30 1/2" - ANY KNOWN WELLS PROPOSED WITHIN X" XX _ := 311 MAXIMUM 150' OF ANY KNOWN LEACHING FACILITY. xx ID - ' " 5'-8" 1s' MIN---I - _ -! _ _ _ 5. WITHIN LIMIT OF EXCAVATION REMOVE 5-2 4'-6" 4'-0" MIN. so•BErm oN 15 1/2" ��'- `� 2" MIN. '� ALL TOPSOIL, SUBSOIL AND OTHER Z = LIQUID DEPTH OUTLET TEE ,y k �'��' \�� ��a OF 1 8 TO IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL. XX - - (cas CONTROL) BOX ,�`,, ,,s e )� 1/2 WASHED STONE XX 5'-8.. PRECAST DIST. 24• RES 24' " / XX iv •o- a< e a �/ 6. REPLACE ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL WITH INDICATES - / o ESTIMATED ' ' r-4 ' ' ' ° ``- ``< CLEAN GRANULAR SAND, FREE FROM ORGANIC EL = Xxx OUS SUBSTANCES. EL = Xxx - SEASONAL HIGH a BOTTOM ON LEVEL STABLE BASE �a 3" �- --�� _ 2' 2' 1 4' 1 3/4" TO TONE ( DOUBLE MIXTURES AND LAYERS MATERIAL AND RIOF DIFFERENT CLASSES GROUND WATER PLAN VIEW " " //^ // /\ '7 1/2' I (TYP) I (TYP) WASHED STONE (NO FINES) OF SOIL SHALL NOT BE USED. THE FILL SHALL 6 MIN. 3 4 TO ` /` 7/���/1� NOT CONTAIN ANY MATERIAL LARGER THAN . DATE: DATE: 1 IN. STONE CROSS-SECTION VIEW PLAN VIEW CROSS-SECTION TWO INCHES. A SIEVE ANALYSIS, USING A #4 x x INDICATES' Y: _�_ OBSERVED SIEVE, SHALL BE PERFORMED ON A TEST BY: TEST B GROUND WATER "VACANT LAND" REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF FILL. UP TO 45% THE BSC GROUP, INC. THE BSC GROUP, INC. LL '_ III RE WEIGHT OF THE FILL SAMPLE MAY BE DESIGN CRITERIA: RETAINED ON THE #4 SIEVE. SIEVE ANALYSES WITNESSED BY: WITNESSED BY: TOWN OF BARNSTABLE NEW REGULATIONS LOT 11 26.3 x L� III ALSO SHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE FRACTION INDICATES N/F 26.3 X CONCRE'J E III OF FILL SAMPLE_ PASSING THE #4 SIEVE, SUCH X X PERC. 11 DESIGN FLOW: ANALYSES MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT THE REQUIRE SOIL EVALUATOR TO INSPECT BARNSTABLE LAND TRUST BOUND III MATERIAL. MEETS EACH OF THE FOLLOWING TEST SPECIFICATIONS: PERC. RATE: PERC. RATE: BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION PRIOR TO ANY ASSESSORS MAP 217 /� 0q D III 4 BEDROOMS AT 110 G.P.B./D 440 G.P.D. 100 4 MUST PASS #4 SIEVE ( mm EFFECTIVE PARTICLE SIZE �-MIN./INCH 2 MIN./INCH INSTALLATION AND ALSO PRIOR TO FINAL PARCEL 42 22�.89 I ) SOIL EVALUATOR SOIL EVALUATOR INDICATES \ II' CRAIG FIELD CRAIG FIELD UNSUITABLE BACKFILLING. � REQUIRED SEPTIC TANK: - 10%100% MUST PASS #50 SIEVE (0.30 mm EFFECTIVE PARTICLE SIZE) 0%20% MUST PASS 100 SIEVE MATERIAL / / �� / I II I 440 X 200% - 880 GAL. (0.15 mm EFFECTIVE PARTICLE SIZE) SOIL CLASS: SOIL CLASS: 1L / / I II I SEPTIC TANK PROVIDED: = 1500 GAL. 0%-5% MUST PASS #200 SIEVE x X / / I ,/ f 11 I (0.075 mm EFFECTIVE PARTICLE SIZE) L.T.A.R. L.T.A.R. 141 �610 / 11 7. EXISTING UTILITIES WHERE SHOWN � / / f IN THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. 0.74 G.P.D./SQ.FT. 0.74 G.P.D./SQ.FT. _ f II I [SIZE OF LEACHING FACILITY REQUIRED: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON- / j fj II I DESIGN PERC. RATE: <2 MIN. INCH SIBLE FOR PROPERLY LOCATING AND . � POSED CON- PCK Lj / �. I 1� 00 II X 27.4 I / SOTRUCTION ACTIVITY WIORDINATING THE DTH DIG-SAFE DATUM: 26.6 g���o�Ne sE / � � '� I I �- � JI I LONG TERM APPL. RATE 0, /S.F. / G.P.D AND THE APPLICABLE UTILITY VERTICAL DATUM: TOWN OF BARNSTABLE GIS - MSLt / 1 �� _ CONCRETE / j I EXISTING UTILITY SYSTEM IN SERVICE. COMPANY AND MAINTAINING THE BOUND - i i / '` _ '' I �i D CATCH 440 GPD = 0,74 GPD/SF - 596 S.F. DIG-SAFE SHALL BE NOTIFIED PER BENCH MARK USED: CONCRETE BOUND ON EAST SIDE OF BUTTONWOOD LANE I BORDERING/VEGETATIVE WETLANDS f FOUND �7- -- / / I �f BASIN RIM 27,2 SIZE OF LEACHING FACILITY PROVIDED: THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS ELEVATION 35.78. / x LOT 10 1 t I fI BASIN I STATUTE CHAPTER 82, SECTION 409 T1-P1 / � N/F \, ` ~� `26-- _ f f I RVM 27.2 J AT TEL. 1-888-344-7233. THE / TRUST 25.8 - ( f I ENGINEER DOES NOT GUARANTEE w>F / \ \ ' `- I If I 4-2' WIDE, 2' DEEP, 25' LONG TRENCH THEIR ACCURACY OR THAT ALL o \ ASSESSORS MAP 2117 �- I J o PROFILE: NOT TO SCALE o, PARCEL 31 t; ''�` UTILITIES AND SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES WETLAND 20,529f S.F. \` �� I . f f l f '' 4X(2'+2'+2')X25' = 600 S.F. ARE SHOWN. LOCATIONS AND V4 f f I J \ ELEVATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES EL.=A FIRST PIPE LENGTH C3 1 UPLAND 20,806f S.F,, \ ~ .� IL j ; \ ❑F LEACHING AREA TAKEN FROM RECORD I / f \ 600 x 0.74 GPD / SF = 444 GPD CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SIZE TOP FOUNDATION TO BE SET LEVEL � ✓ / CONCRETE COVERS TO WITHIN FOR MIN: 2' 1 •�- --'"'� � WF#$ \ Tl`-P2 � f � f �.� O f PLANS. THE 25.3 X 2� LOCATION AND INVERTS OF UTILITIES EL.=X 6" OF FINISHED GRADE. X / ` \ \� I f / f l� \, PROVIDED AND STRUCTURES AS REQUIRED PRIOR EL.=xx U' 27.3 / " - o , \ 28J " ' "°"' 1i�` `�\ 112" METAL I j/ // / jCONCf \\ CATCH a TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 4 PVC (PERF) _ _ PIP I ETE r E. S WF 7 IZE OF RESERVE # ' wF#9 < / / INV 25.1 �I I �/C j/ BOUND 28'3 �\ RIM z28 s FACILITY PROVIDED: I g„ THIS SYSTEM IS NOT DESIGNED FOR 4" PV(// `� //_ .�/ 2..-1/8"-3/8 DOUBLE.WASHED STONE - SC 40 4" PVC SCH 4 a / ' .. 'Vk- .. � 1 \ _ _ THE U GAR /4"-,-1 1/2" DOUBLE WASHED STONE G I D %/ - 4-c' ,WIDE,` 2' DEEP, 25' LONG TRENCH .a GAR BAGEF GRINDERASENGOR N E ..,. R =B I=D �' RECOMMENDED DUE TO RECOG IZED • �' PROPOSED C j _ z TF ti\ / A/�1 4x(2'+2'+2')x25' = 600 S.F. FA�IUTY.I=E 5 OU I_GI=H . . \ o _ WELL �. WF#10 /TLET I=F o IRON `I, \ , - 8� / � i < DIST. BOX • . r 28.8 -. �-J w .__.._ _-_-. i � 27.4 X PIPE -r' '� I ® OF LEACHING AREA SEPTIC TANK in BOTTOM EL.=- \ ` = WF#11 �,// LANE 9. EXITING INVERTS ARE TO BE CH CKED BY N/F FOUND ,,' `29•� , ---- -� 1 /l -' �a�` 600 x 0.74 GPD / SF = 444 GPD THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CO STRUCTION. HIGH WATER EL. K f " -� '� - /f PR❑VIDED D S E ENGINEER IS. J. D. SAUN ER �. TO BE NOTIFI D OF i' , �. .- G' aF- j / ® - ANY F ASSESSORS MAP 217 .-' \ --. e Q � � / �,, �- FIELD CHANGES THAT MAY BE 'g. F " .a e WF CATCH REQUIRED. � �. 12 / T H 28.1 PARCEL 4 'V Ii! # WF#13 / --E3ASIV LOCUS INFORMATION INVERT ELEVATIONS: -- 29.3 -' ,_ a RIM 28.6 �'.,._ • �"'�F� // \ --�- . � T1-P4 -`- �-- � CURRENT OWNER: J.D.S. REALTY TRUST ` c 29.1 ,f 4t? o � ,� ` i f/ *� ,/ / TITLE REFERENCE: DEED 15016, PAGE 164 657 Main Street RT. 28 Unit 6 TOP OF FOUNDATION 37.1 A � \ . • �� ,O/T � ,, .- � �L� / I � � l ) " - BUILDING 35.50 B a, �' • .• y ( T2 P6 11 30. " �� � 1' �) ! WF A6 W. Yarmouth MassaChUsett 4 INVERT AT B �: # PLAN REFERENCE: PLAN BOOK 422, PAGE 59 � �� ! 29.5 X - \ ``., I -►// c� ! I 02673 4" INVERT AT SEPTIC TANK (IN) 35.10 C ° 29 4 �..� � } �•` 4 29 � � 52. // 1, 4" INVERT AT SEPTIC TANK (OUT) 34.85 D �f • •T2-P� �"` \ T1-P5 ' j Q / I WFeA5 0 ASSESSORS MAP: 217 508 778 �919 �, 50 su / / I I PARCEL: 31 4" INVERT AT DIST. BOX (IN) 34.77 E x 31.4 �'� �` ' ' "� TP5 w # 5 �'' i / pR TO 0 �--'� l �i l I ��` PROJECT TITLE: 4" INVERT AT DIST. BOX (OUT) 34.60 F . • , �► ZONING DISTRICT: FRONT 2 � f Rv �e I SETBACKS: FRONT 30' • � i � .•. I �// ' .�^ pl Nq y8q Sep OF`$;�-� - "�,,.�-- ' J- �l ,� � � WF -A4 W SIDE - . y ``• �,..�,,, WF 3 � 1 - .� fie$ � �.- I � � 1 # � REAR 15' DESIGN F . I� 930.7 y I I `� 3 - // ,> Z 29.7 WFL f 0,p x� / 1 INVERTS AT LEACHING FACILITY: \� __ If 1 �>r� ��-,,,,,,,,,���rrr��� `� T2-P4 �I I/ 3.6' a P#2 ^` --- _ '6, 31.3 / , 1- MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 87,120f S.F. SEWAGE GE DISP SAL 3V N PROPOSED / EXISTING LOT AREA: 41 335f S.F. . # X 30.4 BGC-4 GARAGE / / �, SYSTEM 4" INVERT AT BEGINNING WF 1 BCC�3- - -� I I I `" `►/ c, �` F#A3 1927 RECORD LOCATION OF STONE/- �(•- - \ 1 r -r32_ I t, _ z OVERLAY DISTRICT: AP i OF LEACHING TRENCH 34.50 G ` � 9 _ � LINED DITCH AS PER � T2-P3� '•,� . . � 3 .3, _ � I SLAB 34.1 �/ 1 t � " NORMAN HAYES 1 20 06 ` �� -- V- 1 to NITROGEN SENSITIVE 4 INVERT AT END / / `� -moo- 31.1 ,�' l �``�, 3R �� �~ -u�-. � f� I / ` ' s�>< ZONE: NOT A ZONE II-PRIVATE WELL OF LEACHING TRENCH 32.50 H 132.0 ;�, •\X\\`�30.8 \ • •• r `" `� /'', ��,0, z / - / m FEMA FLOOD I ELEVATION AT BOTTOM \ •• / , 0 2�.0, \ a G w ~// ' / 1 !'\ ZONE DISTRICT: "C" DATED 7/2/1992 BUTTONWOO LN I 32.00 J \ T -P2 \ n; f I >� WF A2 PANEL #250001 0003 D IL OF LEACHING TRENCH ` N / e - \I_ \ # N STATE HIGHWAY DR�+INAGE SWALE \ I - • .( i- PROPOSED 20 o / W. p p FILLED WITH STREET` SAND. WATER S i� ` ' • •� _ RELOCATED OF �i ,r`+ c �J p Y11. i�ARNSiT BLE ESTIMATED GROUNDWATER X K OVERFLOWING DURIN HIGH RAINS ` \o T1�P6' ` DWELLING , B,V_`� co ,� �\ , WF#A1 LOCUS PLAN . NO SCALE ELEVATION \ ` .z.o.F. 37.1 �o _ , la \ /q� /� \ \ -- •.'a,5. ' BRA w� �� 14 1 /l / \ \ \` C H U TTS \ \ 0 0 10 VARIANCES REQUESTED: pSO� 0 � ' \''� • '� v ,/ 0 � ,� RgWL - / �l _34,_ \ \ ' \ ROp ✓ / ylJ, V \ / T,y /Cl / ` f 4ts N F t, mi `_ moo , r T 3! 7~ f � � '! \ c� PREPARED FOR: -6/�� STATE OF MASSACHUSETTSIi , TITLE 5. _ _ _ wE ``�r 8 "� - • 4 \ \ 0 C 36.6 �C `h . . / �6.0'. 10 / 0 0 UP - _ TE Mr. PATRICK P GE N NONE 37.6 /36.6 � sv- 1_8" '1 AY• ��1: �., 14,E -:.,' // /ICONC8E34.7 f - \ \ N/ ate _ '��: _ // BOUNiJ j , \i "VACANT LAND" z z 1780 MAIN STREET, OUTE 6A CD TOWN OF BARNSTABLE 3�1 APRON NV6� - �\$ \ _ .i _ ! o BARNSTABLE - ARTICILLE Vil: MARGINAL LOTS. LOTS WITH LESS..THAN 4 -- * \ `� �2 ��a� ems,® _'__I w�/ FOUND / ,\ L❑CUS _ WEST BARNST BLE o -_�C 37.1 _ `� ,� `~ �;�: \ ;- - %i' -'r 11 ABOVE THE ADJUSTED HIGH GROUNDWATER AND THE BOTTOM f _ \ -`Y M _ �/ �,�__ _` �`� / m MA 02668 OF THE UNSUITABLE SOILS. 5 SEPERATION IS PROPOSED. _ � ® �" \ 6A W _rv, _�., �� // / " (508) 362-4 1 1 e BARNSTABLE - 397.2 PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY ON LOTS WITH LESS �'' y, \ ��o�\�p o .! = -� �� / t 132 DATE: APRIL 5, 2005 Ii ' _ ON �w 11 11 W THAN 40,000 S.F. OF BUILDABLE AREA. _ - 37� -- ��0 '� _ f BENCHMARK - - � ., 00 ` ,, \ Q,,' f j COMP. DESIGN: K. EALY PROPOSED WELL IS TO BE 152 FROM S.A.S. _� _ -� CONCRETE' -, TOP OF CONCRETE BOUND �:= \ ` BOUND EL 35.78 6 CHECK: M. DIBB I \ \ / DRAWN: P. HAGIST w CATCH �- -- PLAN VIEW T. Q A BASIN `` � -�~~'�•, -FOUND-' �`` --1��� -.. r7i ; '`��� //� �/ 1 FLOOR P LAN 1�!09, __ -- � � --� � . '��� ` � // � / � FIELD: D. GAZZOLO J. McCARTIN RIM 35.6 O/ / i / - / �,./ �� SCALE: 1 = 20 FEE T FILE NO. 8881-SEP.D G CATCH � /.,�. l�� BASIN 37.Q -�-'� `. - co SEE ATTACHED RIM 35.5 ® CATCH �� CONCRETE I 0 10 20 40 FT. DWG N0. 5664-03 HEET 1 OF 1 6�� BOUND a JOB NO. 4-8881.00 BASIN :Z . zk IL SEPTIC TANK DETAIL: 1 50o GALLON DISTRIBUTION BOX DETAIL: NOT TO SCALE _ ©IL TEST f�IT DATA. XXX LEACHING TRENCH DETAIL. NOT TO SCALE REVISIONS NOT To SCALE N0. OF OUTLETS 5 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION TEST PIT TEST PITS- NOTES: 1. SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE STEEL 5. INLET AND OUTLET TEES TO BE CAST IRON, FINISHED GRADE 36" MAX ,COVER X X REINFORCED CONCRETE. SCHED. 40 PVC OR CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE. GRD. EL. TEES TO BE CENTERED UNDER MANHOLE COVER. " GRD. EL. _ REMOVABLE 2 WALLS FINISHED GRAD 2. SEPTIC TANK TO WITHSTAND H 10 LOADING E NOTES. X X COVER I LOAM & SEED DISTURBED AREAS EST. HIGH G W. i EST. HIGH GW. UNLESS UNDER PAVEMENT, DRIVES OR / // / TRAVELED WAYS, WHEREIN H-20 LOADING +„i;;�+ r�;;y+ry;;�+ + i;;y+;, Z„ 1, DIST. BOX TO WITHSTAND H-10 LOADING �� / / x SHALL APPLY. PVC BARRIER - XX XX / COMPUTATION 3. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS AND CONCRETE TUNLESS UNDER PAVEMENT, DRIVES OR 4" PVC 4' 'ZEERF�I 4�VCO.OQ��' . / CAP ENDS GENERAL NOTES: / XX HIGH GROUNDWATER C " ' '=-' ' -' •' / 2-24 DIA CONCRETE MANHOLES � TRAVELED WAYS WHEREIN H-20 LOADING --� XX / / XX CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. e u a e u o e r o e o e o o u %� 1. THIS PLAN IS FOR DESIGN AND XX BASED ON TP X 4. FILL ALL UNUSED KNOCKOUTS WITH TO 6'EOF FHNISHLGRA FOUGHT ' ,, -�- 15" SHALL APPLY. �° e°��° s�° f�` q�°. �� p�,� �, a� gf���gofQ� qp�� e,� CONSTRUCTION OF THE SEWAGE /o M`r qf°a. fir°°• �°4�i` • o u o fl o u o o u o y o u o 4 o y o o u o u o K o n o d o r o o u + EFFECTIVE DEPTH DISPOSAL FACILITY ONLY. MORTAR. . TEE TO BE UNDER " 6 5 5" g' 8 2- PROVIDE INLET TEE OR BAFFLE WHERE // °�° �°° d d° ° d d d d d o 0 XX / XX / DEPTH TO WATER(OR BOT. OF HOLE)_ XX OUTLETS , , ate° d° 17_ MIN. /. � n �, aM° na°�°a� l / / M.H. OPENING �--• SLOPE OF � � � -� � � � 2. AL. PIPE EXCEEDS � � / L CONS EEDS 0.08 � CONSTRUCTION/ XX / XX EL = X XX INDEX WELL XX COVER a;,y +, -;; , FT./FT OR �� CTION METHODS AND +' MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO MASS. //�` � � e �/ � 3" -+�eQ�oQ�,,e e °�,e o a�oe e Q odua-.�oda -j- IN PUMPED SYSTEM. r _ t 25, LEVEL B[ITTOM / WATER LEVEL RANGE ZONE XX__ �- IN D.E.P TITLE 5 AND LOCAL BOARD CURRENT DEPTH®INDEX WELL(12/00)_XX--_ 4" - BOTTOM ON LEVEL / 2" 3. FIRST TWO FEET OF PIPE OUT OF DIST. OF HEALTH REGULATIONS. XX / RAISE M.H W,� 6" MIN. 3 " / XX WATER LEVEL: ADJUSTMENT - XX __ 10-6 SEWER BRICK -_�-' <_:, STABLE BASE " /4 TO BOX TO BE LAID LEVEL. PROFILE 3. ALL PIPES LOCATED UNDER PAVEMENT XX DEPTH TO ADJUSTED HIGH WATER _ XX - 10'-0" & MORTAR �: < < .< CROSS-SECTION 1 1/2 CRUSHED 4. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS AND CONCRETE 40 OROR AEQUAL.WAY SHALL BE SCHEDULE NORMAL WATER LEVEL 12" STONE BASE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. 36 MAX. - 12' MIN. COVER 4. THERE ARE NO KNOWN PRIVATE WELLS EL X 3" 5. FILL ALL UNUSED KNOCKOUTS WITH MORTAR.. 27 MIN. FINISH GRADE 4" MIN. LOAM & SEED LOCATED WITHIN 150 FT. OF THE XX I PRECAST SEPTIC TANK <, 10 14" PROPOSED LEACHING FACILITY NOR INLET TEE ;S 5'-1" 30 1/2" ANY KNOWN WELLS PROPOSED WITHIN X„ XX _ - _ 311 MAxIMUMk258 150' OF ANY KNOWN LEACHING FACILITY. 5'-2" " `, ' " _ _ \ 5. WITHIN LIMIT OF EXCAVATION REMOVE 4-6 4-0 MIN. so•AErm oN r 5-8 15 1 2" P Is MIN _ / / XX - Z (VALET NEE = `�; �- `�; " ALL TOPSOIL, SUBSOIL AND OTHER - LIQUID DEPTH (cas CONTROL) i•- '� � �� PRECAST DIST. 24• < RES 24' �i / IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL. XX 5'-8" dT- 2 MIN. OF 1 8 TO N BOX , �,p � & ,� , u 1/2" WASHED STONE 6. REPLACE ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL WITH XX .- � \ C INDICATES _ ,: _-,. ,. <, .//C,�'/,,G�� 7// //� LEAN GRANULAR SAND, FREE FROM ORGANIC _ MATERIAL AND DE �_ ESTIMATED4A a / / DOUBLE DELETERIOUS SUBSTANCES. XX - X X - e 4` d �. --2 2 4 - MIXTURES AND L - X � _ BOTTOM ON LEVEL STABLE BASE � a WASHED AVERS OF DIFFER a ` S ENT EL X EL �° TONE NO FINES CLASSES SEASONAL HIGH 3 I I °�`� I,�� � ' (TYP) ( ) OF SOIL SHALL NOT BE USED. THE FILL SHALL GROUND WATER PLAN VIEW " " Q ^////\�/� 7 1/2 DATE: DATE: 6 MIN. 3/4 TO ` //���///� NOT CONTAIN AIJY MATERIAL LARGER THAN CROSS-SECTION VIEW PLAN VIEW CROSS-SECTION TWO INCHES. A SIEVE ANALYSIS USING A 4 X X INDICATES 1 1/2" STONE SIEVE, SHALL BE PERFORMED ON A # TEST BY: TEST BY: �' OBSERVED „ GROUND WATER VACANT LAND � REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF FILL. UP TO 45� THE BSC GROUP, INC. THE BSC GROUP, INC. .- I( PLE MAY 13E RETAIBY NED ONGHT F THE E#4 SIEVE FILL . SIEVE ANALYSES ' DESIGN CRITERIA• WITNESSED BY: WITNESSED BY TOWN OF BARNSTABLE NEW REGULATIONS L07 11 26.3 x � II ALSO SHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE FRACTION OF FILL SAMPLE LE PASSING THE 4 SIEVE, SUCH X X PERC. REQUIRE SOIL EVALUATOR TO INSPECT NSF 26.3 X BOUND jj DESIGN FLOW: MANALYSES MUST ATERIAL MEETS EACH FRATE#THAT THE TEST BARNSTABLE LAND TRUST THE FOLLOWING PERC. RATE: PERC. RATE: F-OI�ND ` I I 4 BEDROOMS AT 110 G.P.B./D 440 G.P.D. SPECIFICATIONS: BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION PRIOR TO ANY AssEssoRs MAP 217 f � ' 100% MUST PASS #4 SIEVE PARCEL 42 69, / \ I I 4.75 mm EFFECTIVE PARTICLE SIZE ,MIN./INCH 2 MIN./INCH ICATESINSTALLATION AND ALSO PRIOR TO FINAL 22 I ( ) SOIL EVALUATOR SOIL EVALUATOR UNSUITABLE \ II I REQUIRED SEPTIC TANK: 10%-100� MUST PASS #50 SIEVE CRAIG FIELD CRAIG FIELD ® MATERIAL BACKFILLING. \ I II I (0.30 mm EFFECTIVE PARTICLE SIZE) j 501E CLASS: SOIL CLASS: i \ / I II I - 0%-20! MUST PASS #100 SIEVE 440 X 200% - 880 GAL. \ T (0.15 mm EFFECTIVE PARTICLE SIZE) j 1500 GAL. 07-5% MUST PASS #200 SIEVE X x � � � ,,� �JI � II I SEPTIC TANK PROVIDED: = i " I (0.075 mm EFFECTIVE PARTICLE SIZE) L.T.A.R. �7�26'10 ' /' 11 I 7. EXISTING UTILITIES WHERE SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. 0.74 R. ) II I SIZE OF LEACHING FACILITY REQUIRED: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON- SIBLE G.P.D./SQ.FT. 0.74 G.P.D./SQ.FT. CK y 11 I MIN./ INCH COORDINATING OTHE PROPOSED CONPERLY LOCATING - `gp, i I r w II X( 27.4 I DESIGN PERC. RATE: <2 DATUM: SE ! STRUCTION ACTIVITY WITH DIG-SAFE LONG TERM APPL. RATE 0,74 / AND THE APPLICABLE UTILITY 26.6 gU��o�N� i fir. r,i � I �,� Iri J I I G.P.D S.F. VERTICAL DATUM: TOWN OF BARNSTABLE GIS - MSL± CONCRETE f`� r 1 / I COMPANY AND MAINTAINING THE it -BENCH MARK USED: CONCRETE BOUND ON EAST SIDE OF BUTTONWOOD LANE BOUND - r� I ' '�` IJ / 0I BASINCATC 440 GPD - 0.74 GPD/SF = 596 S,F, EXISTING UTILITY SYSTEM IN SERVICE. FOUND I h � BORDERING/VEGETATIVE WETLANDS DIG-SAFE SHALL BE NOTIFIED PER �7-6- / r I CATCH RIM 27.2 SIZE OF LEACHING FACILITY PROVIDED: THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS ELEVATION 35.78. / L x LOT 10 t r �._ r l I1 BASIN I STATUTE CHAPTER 82, SECTION 409 Z / N/F ` T,-P1 - --2s --__ 1 _ _ /I RIM 27.2 1 AT TEL. 1-888-344-7233. THE / TRUST ` 25.8 -. , f /f I , , ENGINEER DOES NOT GUARANTEE / I I 4-2 WIDE, 2 DEEP, 25 LONG TRENCH THEIR ACCURACY OR THAT ALL w _/ ASSESSORS MAP 217 ? UTILITIES AND SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES I 'R®FILE. NOT TO SCALE o \ e I I o �Oy PARCEL 31 ,� <' I I / / r, I , , , , ARE SHOWN. LOCATIONS AND E EL.=A V4 \ WETLAND 20,529f S.F. � `� ` ` I I / I / �, \ 4x(2 +2 +2 )x25 = 600 S,F. ELEVATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FIRST PIPE LENGTH o UPLAND 20,806f S.F;� "N �. ,� I / \ OF LEACHING AREA TAKEN FROM RECORD PLANS. THE TOP FOUNDATION CONCRETE COVERS TO WITHIN TO BE SET LEVEL "� / I I EL.=X 6" OF FINISHED GRADE. FOR MIN. 2' \ 3*L --- L WF#8 T1`'-P2 ,atl� ate. / 25.3 X I / /) I r L"'`2 0\ /- 600 x 0,74 GPD / SF = -444 GPD CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SIZE, 6' X / - O I / Ir �� -- h ® PROVIDED LOCATION AND INVERTS OF UTILITIES • EL.=xx - 0 27.3� 28 / \, 12" METAL I / // llI \ CATCH 0 THE START OF ONSTRUAND STRUCTURES AS ICTION RED PRIOR 4" PVC (PERF) ` o ` \ I T t` WF#7 l / I CONCRETE PVC////�� \ \ / - - -�� 2"-1/s"-3/8" DOUBLE WASHED STUNS 'a / " `.` / PIPE , / 28•3 BASIN SIZE OF RESERVE FACILITY PROVIDED: SCH 40 4 PVC SCH 40 / WF cF-:. ` ITV 25.1 I r / BOUND e. ' # , - I• �" � ,. C / � RIM �8.s 8. THIS SYSTEM IS NOT DESIGNED FOR /4"-1, 1/2" DOUBLE' WASHED STONE / ` � / ` 4 �'- �- � I � � : � /� r, � - THE USE OF A GARBAGE GRINDER FiJ U I�I D r A GARBAGE GRINDER ,IS Nor 1=D '.• / \ ' 1 T'I-P3 C? / .. -. ! / Qj �'-� 4-2 WIDE, 2 DEEP, 25 LONG TRENCH RECOMMENDED DUE TO RECOG [ZED z �. _ I=E 1=G I=H `� r , _ PROPOSED ., / / _ ,,.� ,; _ ptp.!� \ ,� WELL -• �. WF 10 t� a .;x r,.*s-T^T +,,�cr«a.:rT, .T �� �c ' i i r FACILITY. V.g� wA ��� 4.x(2 +2 +2 )x25 600 S.F. � � I I=F v IRON � �' _ G A �L 5 OUTLET � I �,.n # � J / / � i DIST. Box 1 J 27.4 X PIPE `, ,,,-`- 28.8 �, --.� - *-- ,� / W // ® ❑F LEACHING AREA SEPTIC TANK to BOTTOM EL.=-• WF#11 i y// LANE 9. EXITING INVERTS ARE TO BE CH CKED BY N F FOUND ,�" '`2s� -- - - / l // .--- `,� 600 x 0,74 GPD / SF = 444 GPD THE (CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. HIGH WATER EL.=K / �`�� ''s�` `�� ` __ T 10. THE ENGINEER IS TO BE NOTIFI D OF J. D. SAUNDERS ,.f E �� - _ ,f �. _ PROVIDED ASSESSORS MAP 217 \ -^ ` cam DGE Qom`' / - l II �� ® _-- - ANY FIELD CHANGES THAT MAY BE j r �- e , 28.1 PARCEL 4 r ,� V,�, WF#12 CATCH LOCUS INFORMATION F REQUIRED. _ kF#6 / , , WF#13 / - -BASF O R M A TI O N INVI �T LE ELEVATIONS: 29.3 F ! ''� .-_ T1-P4 RIM 28.6 ;o- F,�1 r� • N •'�`rT ! X � \ / ��••..., � I / w /l � / l rV CURRENT OWNER: J.D.S. REALTY TRUST �\ • ��' / 29.1 - �� �� '���- o '.� '- / ;� -vw / I WF#A7 TITLE REFERENCE: DEED 15016, PAGE 164 657 Main Street,TOP OF FOUNDATION 37.1 A ,� • . �'''� •pr r W •#5 '� `/ I / (RT. 28) Unit 6 �o • • . �� ' -' 19 ` l fr W. Yarmouth Massachusett 4 INVERT AT BUILDING 35.50 B �� '�'y I 29.5 X T2 P6 \ 30• o " TANK IN 35.10 C �.," �°"-•.-•�' / yl/ I)� � WF#A6 PLAN REFERENCE: PLAN BOOK 422, PAGE 59 02673 4 INVERT AT SEPTIC A ( ) �-� 29.4 -'•;� J 4 f 29� \ A'-� 52 w 11 ! /# WFeA5 0 ' ASSESSORS MAP: 217 508 778 �919 4" INVERT AT SEPTIC TANK (OUT) 34.85 D F T1-P5 50' 11 I I z PARCEL: 31 11 .� PROJECT TITLE: 4 INVERT AT DIST. BOX (IN) 34.77 E X 31.4 `�'� �� 7 P5 w �r A R TO D l �'r� �� Il �� I I mo- W ZONING DISTRICT: RF SETBACKS: FRONT 30' • 4" INVERT AT DIST. BOX (OUT) 34.60 F � • ' . � I rr .... I ti ( ) _..- Z I \/ \ `_`.I Nq 1'8q SED C OF�;V,�h; r s� � '•-- _..I � \ ' WF -A4 W SIDE ' f• ^" WF 3 DES r 1 \ DE 15 930.7y \ -> ` r # r, REAR 15' DESIGN F R Z 29.7 • ' WF, 2 / f ``a� 30,p // X INVERTS AT LEACHING FACILITY: , I - I ti _ _ _� / \ _ /� p T2-P4 • o, - / 3.6' _ fiP 2 1 5' 31.3 I MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 87,120f S.F. SEWAGE DISK SAL 4" INVERT AT BEGINNING 2 39.7 BCC-3 ' '� ' � # / -`a1 w / I , > EXISTING LOT AREA: 41,335f S.F. . 1927 RECORD LOCATION OF STONE WF#1 -,_, I (BCC-4 N. PROPOSED - % / v } �� ` VF#A3 SYSTEM • X 30.4 OF LEACHING TRENCH 34.50 G LINED DITCH AS PER T2-P+3' �,� 0'9 SLAB 34.1o" ---- 2- _ �/ OVERLAY DISTRICT. AP N 4" INVERT AT END NORMAN HAVES 1/20/06 _ ` ( ; 3�3 -- - 30 �' _ -- 'r l/ I lI t NITROGEN SENSITIVE N OF LEACHING TRENCH 32.50 H 32 0 ,, ' . 30.8\ "--� 31.1 - _ ~•��� ' ' // I 1 y ` I a v.! ZONE: NOT A ZONE II-PRIVATE WELL \ 4.p zw /I I \ - m FEMA FLOOD ELEVATION AT BOTTOM 0 2�0' �' . r v c I/ I \ ZONE DISTRICT: "C" DATED 7/2/1992 N OF LEACHING TRENCH 32.00 J - T -P2 w ! �, /_ -_ / BUTTONWOO LN. 2 STATE HIGHWAY DRQ INAGE SWALE \ I • . \ PROPOSED 20 /o / , /� ^_ / �\ \\ WF#A2 PANEL #250001 0003 D BARNSTABLE ESTIMATED GROUNDWATER FILLED WITH \STREET SAND. WATER ' 'l T1-P6/ RELOCATED pF N ,� / G J` \ /� W. ELEVATION X K OVERFLOWING\ DURIN� HIGH RAINS ``�, \o -- �, DWELLING , B V• ca ,l / \ \ \ WF#A1 LOCUS PLAN : N❑ SCALE U - \ \ , a � R� *,T.o.F. 37.1 ono _ / \ \ \, ' , lii'I ASSACH U SETTS � I _ VAItil�N �l� REQUESTED: \ \ 14. �s0�I0 T2-pi � �`•�~�` �, 0�� F�" RgwL fir - 1 f (Il .�-34,- I 1 \ ' 1 \ pR /y l t I 11 \ N STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS, TITLE 5. wEC 8" � T 3 // - \ \ 1 PREPARED FOR: 15f) NONE 37.6 - - - C 36.6 C 4 6,p�. 10' l N /36.6 - 5, _11 " LAY' ;r1': � 14" •. r �/ //CONCgETE " \ \ N o Mr. PATRICK P GE _ / BIT APRON\ �. 'F?P -- ;� SQL e :% // BOUND 34.7 I 1 \ „ „ z w V TOWN OF BARNSTABLE _ �C 37.4 \ \ l e� / VACANT LAND z 1780 MAIN STREET, OUTS 6A o \ INV \ 12' s \ i I FOUND o c BARNSTABLE - ARTICILLE VII: MARGINAL LOTS. LOTS WITH LESS THAN 4 ` , / ,\ LOCUS g WEST BARNST BLE ABOVE THE ADJUSTED HIGH GROUNDWATER AND THE BOTTOM 371 �' \ \ �r I OF THE UNSUITABLE SOILS. 5 SEPERATION IS PROPOSED. ,� I 508 362 4 11 BARNSTABLE - 397.2 PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY ON LOTS WITH LESS '� 1j `' - Rg'I 11 1132 . y •o \ DATE. A I PR L 5 005 w THAN 40,000 S.F. OF BUILDABLE AREA. ___ 37:1 w �w \`\ \�0,` 11 �-, I BENCHMARK 2 PROPOSED WELL IS TO BE 152' FROM S.A.S. -__� � �' CONCRETE-- -• '� ~' �0 �`� .I • I TOP OF CONCIRETE COMP./DESIGN: K. EALY CHECK: M. DIBB W CATCH _ q BOUND -'` '/ /� / BOUND EL 35,.78 FLOOR P LAN S• �1 _ 0 BASIN `` � � -FeUIdD- ``� ���``� // -- � PLAN �� E VE DRAWN: P. HAGIST RIM 35.6 - \ © -,��\ ; �,\ / A - _ FIELD: D. GAZZOLO / J. McCARTIN 3 CATCH v ,_� �� SCALE: 1 20 FEET -o - <) �� FILE NO. 8881-SEP.D G BASIN r-�� / �- �,� co SEE ATTACHED RIM 35.5 ® CATCH `'' CONQRETE ,� I 0 10 2040 FT, DWG NO. 5664-03 HEFT 1 OF 1 BASIN -, BOUND JOB NO. 4-8881.00 I' O N O 3 . 11 o Z LOT 11 26 3 X I I 6A N/F 26.3 X ONCREY II BARNSTABLE LAND TRUST FOUND ND I II 132 ASSESSORS MAP 217 PARCEL 42 �.89• ; \ I II s s,,ow AL \ 1 ( II I LOCUS MAP: NOT TO SCALE OF N�4� / << A; AL �' II x 27.4 1 �l► i A 26.6 CONCRETE\ \ CATCH BOUND j i // , ! 1L �-� BASIN u�•�''FOUND ti� 7 BORDERING/VEGETATIVE WETLANDS / ( I �1 CATCH RIM 27.2 - X %X , / LOT 10 ( / ` - ' 11 II RIMAL X 1 N/F ( Tl-P1 -26- - - _ _ 1 ' y ,� TRUST �` ' 25.8 .9 \ ASSESSORS MAP 217 $ AL PARCEL 31 ?s / I /1 / l I PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR DATE / / '• \ WETLAND 20,529f S.F. J / UPLAND 20,806t S.F,, '�` ,� 1 / 4// X � AL WF#8\ T1"e2 AL 25.3 X / I -\28� Oh/` o PLAN w 27.3 \ i \ AL c� 28� 0000 "� a \ � \ \ ?�112" METAL I 11 // CONCRETE \ CATCH c / WF#Ti��e.-, \ PIPE. i i 1 28.3 )Z' BASIN OF i OiCN STONE / r' \ INV 25.1 ! / BOUND \ E \ WF#9 / RIM 28.6 DH/FND - EL DGE28.7 // ,� O �" ! j / FOU D LAND WELL CENTERLINE / \ T1-P3 _ z WATERGATE® - EL 28.1 � \ // WF#10 ST NE IRON �� - -� X 28.8 '� � - // LANE TO ACCOMPANY A BRIDGE 27.4 X PIPE ' ` WF 11 DH/FND • N/F FOUND \ 1 �'29� ` _ \ # - -- -- \ / I �t! /� - REQUEST FOR J. D. SAUNDERS €o�F -�� _ _ , 1 ; .\ o -- - - - -- DETERMINATION ASSESSORS MAP 217 /i \ -29-- OF WF#12 // CATCH 28.1 �\ • PARCEL 4 a WF#13 O i r -- BASIN (R. D.A. \ � /... , � // / 0 29.3 \ �,• F // k#6 _ �� "/ I O RIM 28.6 - / x J, // / , WF#A7 21 BUTTONWOOD LANE 29.1 IN 29.5 x \ xW/ I /00�F051 WEST BARNSTABLE 35.4 O,� 29.4 �.\ / .4 29�� \ \ / '� �/ O / I z �` MASSAC H U S ETTS Sp X 31.4 �J' �� •T2-P7 I 5 / T1 P5 t `&UrFC, r /� l ` i 37.2 ti ��i „ -P5 w �. o Eo �l l� ,� (BARNSTABLE COUNTY) FJ38.2 �' ' • \ / 1 OF �/ _�� `c� 1 F <� �,. •+�WF 3 z \ ` / �� / i WF#A4 EXISTING E30.7 Z 29.7 WF r /f .... / X I 'VI` DWELLING Ir l #1780 ��� T2-P4 o / 2 1 , �/ 31.3 / , I W x 9.7 BCC-3 \ / # / 3 W / \ \` ,�yF#A3 OCTOBER 6. 2005 ��_ _3, z 36.9 1927 RECORD LOCATION OF DITCH `- # _30.4 � 'BCOC9 4 1 STONE LINED AS PER ` T2- \ •• • ' \ f i _ �, //- - NORMAN HAYES 1/20/06 ( o AL 32.0 30.8\Q2,,, / I / � ,, 1 coy REVISIONS: \\ ••T -P2 • ► ` _ /� ' / \\ WF#A2 N0. DATE DESC. STATE HIGHWAY DRAINAGE SWALE ` \ I . • I \ %/ \ \ AL 1 . 1 1/8/05 ADD DRAINAGE DITCH FILLED WITH STREET SAND. WATER • '1 \ \ \ T1-P6 ,� G�� �• V•W r /, � �/ / '\ \\ WF#A1 2. 1/23/06 ADD TRANSECTS & OVERFLOWING DURING HIGH RAINS �/ WELL DITCH TP#1MHB FND _. \ \ UP y-- - -�C36.6 .3 �\ I M14„L � \ ,t // // 37.6 /36.6 \ s 1b LAY' I / CONCgEjF 7 / BBITT APRON `R(P /// \8�L \ BOUND / PREPARED FOR: _..X 37.4 ♦ INVQ. r\ „ i // FOUND \ y \ 12 L / 35 / LOCUS INFORMATION Mr. PATRICK PAGE _\X 37.1 _ ` ` _ = \ \\ � MM _ - , - _ _ � 1780 MAIN STREET, ROUTE 6A �w` '�' � ,�\`' • _ g / CURRENT OWNER: J.D.S. REALTY TRUST WEST BARNSTABLE R,� - R` �N 1/ l , MA 02668 TITLE REFERENCE: DEED 15016, PAGE 164 ON �ayw��o _ ��6• 11 � ' (508) 362-401 1 CATCH BASIN - - _ _ _ _ ` ' 0.0p ,� 0; f / BENCHMARK � \ � TOP OF CONCRETE PLAN REFERENCE: PLAN BOOK 422 PAGE 59 RIM=36.5 - ---�_ _ ONCRE:TE�- i / `36 o BOUND BOUND EL 35.78 ASSESSORS MAP: 217 CATCH `� \ FOUND `� ��\ f 3s-- _ ,�/ PARCEL: 31 BASIN � O W RIM 35.6 r _ ~ ~� �' / ZONING DISTRICT: RF CATCH �•' �i SETBACKS: FRONT 30' BASIN ` 37• - SIDE 15 657 Main Street, Unit 6 RIM 35.5 61 CATCH CONCRETE - 1 REAR 15' W. Yarmouth Massachusetts � BOUND BASIN FOUND O b MINIMUM LOT SIZE. 87,120t S.F. 02673 RIM 35.4 �4\6.0 X 36.9 36.8 EXISTING LOT AREA: 41,335t S.F. 508 778 8919 OVERLAY DISTRICT: AP C) 2005 The BSC Group, Inc. NITROGEN SENSITIVE O \ ZONE: NOT A ZONE II-PRIVATE WELL SCALE: 1" = 20' wMRs 37 FEMA FLOOD 0 2.5 5 10 O ZONE DISTRICT: "C" DATED 7/2/1992 0 10 20 40 FE� CATCH \ PANEL #250001 0003 D BASIN 6'5 O PROJ. MGR.: C. FIELD RIM 36.0 FIELD: D. GAZZOLO / J. McCARTIN E C CALC./DESIGN: K. HEALY DRAWN: K. HEALY O JAN 2 5 2006 CHECK: C. FIELD FILE: 8881 -SEP/RDA.DWG anrrN(STARI_E CONSERVATION DWG. NO: 5664-02 SHEET 1 OF 1 -- - JOB. N0: 4-8881 .00